OCUPHIRE PHARMA, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a−101)
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed by the Registrant
|
☑
|
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
|
☐
|
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
| ☐ |
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a−6(e)(2))
|
| ☑ |
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
| ☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials
|
| ☐ |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a−12
|
Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| ☑ |
No fee required.
|
| ☐ |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a−6(i)(1) and 0−11.
|
| (1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
| (2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
| (3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0−11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
| (4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
| (5) |
Total fee paid:
|
| ☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
| ☐ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0−11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
| (1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
| (2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
| (3) |
Filing Party:
|
| (4) |
Date Filed:
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held June 14, 2018
To Our Shareholders:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on June 14, 2018, at 8:00 a.m. (local time), at the Radisson Hotel, 3 Research Court, Rockville, Maryland 20850. The Annual Meeting is called for the following purposes:
| 1. |
to elect as directors the five nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement to a term of one year each, or until their successors have been elected and qualified;
|
| 2. |
to ratify the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2018;
|
| 3. |
to approve an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000;
|
| 4. |
to approve the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve Proposal 3; and
|
| 5. |
to consider and take action upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
|
The Board of Directors has fixed April 18, 2018 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend, you are respectfully requested by the Board of Directors to promptly either
sign
, date and return the enclosed proxy card or vote
via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided on the proxy card
. A return envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States, is enclosed for your convenience.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Brandt
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
April 23, 2018
|
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on June 14, 2018:
Copies of our
Proxy Materials, consisting of the Notice of Annual Meeting, the Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report are available at
http://www.viewproxy.com/rexahn/2018
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455
Rockville, Maryland 20850
(240) 268-5300
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held June 14, 2018
This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“we”, “us”, or the “Company”) for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at
the Radisson Hotel, located at
3 Research Court, Rockville, Maryland 20850
,
on June 14, 2018, at 8:00 a.m. (local time) and for any postponement or adjournment thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
We are providing our Proxy Materials to record shareholders by sending a printed copy of the full set of our proxy materials (the “Proxy Materials”), consisting of the Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and a proxy card (the “Proxy Card”), and our 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders by mail. As permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, we are also providing access to the Proxy Materials on the Internet.
The Proxy Statement and accompanying form of proxy are first being mailed to stockholders on or about April 27, 2018.
1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL MEETING
| Q: |
Why are these materials being made available to me?
|
| A: |
The Proxy Materials are being provided to you in connection with the Annual Meeting and include this Proxy Statement and the related Proxy Card that are being used in connection with the Board of Directors’ solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. The information included in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process and certain other required information.
|
| Q: |
How do I access the Company’s Proxy Materials online?
|
| A: |
The Proxy Card provides instructions for accessing the Proxy Materials over the Internet, and includes the Internet address where those materials are available. The Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting and the Company’s 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders can also be viewed on the Company’s website at
www.rexahn.com
.
|
| Q: |
What shares owned by me can be voted?
|
| A: |
All shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”) owned by you as of the close of business on the Record Date may be voted by you. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote. These shares include those (1) held directly in your name as the shareholder of record
(“Shareholder of Record”)
, and (2) held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank or other nominee.
|
| Q: |
What is the Record Date?
|
| A: |
The Record Date is April 18, 2018. Only Shareholders of Record as of the close of business on this date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
|
| Q: |
How many shares are outstanding?
|
| A: |
As of the Record Date, the Company had 31,744,439 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
|
| Q: |
What is the difference between holding shares as a Shareholder of Record and as a beneficial owner?
|
| A: |
As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
|
Shareholder of Record
If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the Shareholder of Record. As the Shareholder of Record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the Company or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
2
Beneficial Owner
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and your broker, bank or other nominee is considered, with respect to those shares, the Shareholder of Record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, because you are not the Shareholder of Record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you receive a proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee. Your broker, bank or other nominee has provided voting instructions for you to use. If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, please contact your broker, bank or other nominee so that you can receive a legal proxy to present at the Annual Meeting.
| Q: |
What am I voting on?
|
| A: |
You are being asked to vote on (1) the election as directors of the five nominees named in this Proxy Statement to a term of one year each, or until their successors have been elected and qualified, (2) the ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP (“Baker Tilly”) as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2018, (3) the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000, and (4) the approval of the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve Proposal 3.
|
The Company is not currently aware of any matters that will be brought before the Annual Meeting (other than procedural matters) that are not referred to in the enclosed Proxy Card. If any other business should properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof, the persons named in the proxy will vote on such matters according to their best judgment. Discretionary authority to vote on such matters is conferred by such proxies upon the persons voting them.
| Q: |
How do I vote?
|
| A: |
Shareholders of Record may vote by completing and signing the enclosed Proxy Card and returning it promptly in the enclosed postage prepaid, addressed envelope, or at the Annual Meeting in person. We will pass out written ballots to anyone who is eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting. We also will request persons, firms, and corporations holding shares of the Company’s Common Stock in their names or in the name of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to send proxy material to and obtain proxies from the beneficial owners and will reimburse the holders for their reasonable expenses in so doing. Proxy Cards properly executed and delivered by shareholders (by mail or via the Internet) and timely received by the Company will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein. If you authorize a proxy to vote your shares over the Internet or by telephone, you should not return a Proxy Card by mail, unless you are revoking your proxy. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, and are therefore not a Shareholder of Record, you must request a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee in order to vote at the Annual Meeting.
|
If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote via the Internet by going to
www.proxyvote.com
, while Shareholders of Record may go to
www.aalvote.com/rnn
to vote via the Internet. All shareholders must have their control number in order to vote via the Internet.
3
| Q: |
How many votes do you need to hold the Annual Meeting?
|
| A: |
Forty percent of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date must be present at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy, in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum.
|
| Q: |
How many votes must the director nominees have to be elected?
|
| A: |
In order for a director to be elected, he must receive the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares voted. There is no cumulative voting for the Company’s directors or otherwise.
|
| Q: |
What are the voting requirements to approve the other proposals?
|
| A: |
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter is required to ratify the Company’s independent auditors and to approve an adjournment of the Annual Meeting The affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares is required to approve the authorized share increase.
|
| Q: |
Who will count the votes?
|
| A: |
Votes at the Annual Meeting will be counted by an inspector of election, who will be appointed by the Board of Directors or the chairman of the Annual Meeting.
|
| Q: |
What is the effect of not voting?
|
| A: |
If you are a beneficial owner of shares in street name and do not provide the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares with specific voting instructions then, under applicable rules, the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares can generally vote on “routine” matters, but cannot vote on “non‑routine” matters. In the case of a non-routine item, your shares will be considered “broker non-votes” on that proposal.
|
Proposal 2 (ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm), Proposal 3 (approval of the authorized share increase) and Proposal 4 (approval of the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve Proposal 3) are matters we believe will be considered “routine.” Proposal 1 (election of directors), we believe will be considered “non-routine.”
If you are a Shareholder of Record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting. If you are a Shareholder of Record and you properly sign and return your Proxy Card, your shares will be voted as you direct. If no instructions are indicated on such Proxy Card and you are a Shareholder of Record, shares represented by the proxy will be voted in the manner recommended by the Board of Directors on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement, namely “FOR” all the director nominees, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018, “FOR” the approval of the authorized share increase, and “FOR” the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary.
4
| Q: |
How are broker non-votes and abstentions treated?
|
| A: |
Broker non-votes and abstentions with respect to a proposal are counted as present or represented by proxy for purposes of establishing a quorum. If a quorum is present, broker-non votes and votes to withhold will have no effect on the outcome of the votes on Proposal 1 (election of directors), but abstentions will count as votes against Proposal 2 (ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm) and Proposal 4 (approval of the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve Proposal 3), and broker non-votes and abstentions will have the same effect as votes against Proposal 3 (approval of the authorized share increase).
|
| Q: |
Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote after I have voted?
|
| A: |
You may revoke your proxy and change your vote by voting again via the Internet or telephone, by completing, signing, dating and returning a new Proxy Card or voting instruction form with a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Only your latest dated Proxy Card received at or prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking your proxy unless you forward written notice to the Secretary of the Company at the above stated address or you vote by ballot at the Annual Meeting.
|
| Q: |
What does it mean if I receive more than one Proxy Card?
|
| A: |
It means that you have multiple accounts at the transfer agent and/or with brokers, banks or other nominees. To ensure that all of your shares in each account are voted, please sign and return all Proxy Cards, vote with respect to all accounts via the internet or by telephone, or, if you plan to vote at the Annual Meeting, contact each broker, bank or other nominee so that you can receive all necessary legal proxies to present at the Annual Meeting.
|
| Q: |
What are the costs of soliciting these proxies and who will pay?
|
| A: |
We will bear the costs of preparing, printing, assembling, and mailing the Proxy Materials and of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitations by mail, the Company and its directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies by telephone and email. We will request brokers, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting material to the owners of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that they hold in their names. We will reimburse banks and brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the distribution of the Company’s proxy materials.
|
| Q: |
Do I have appraisal or similar dissenter’s rights?
|
| A: |
Appraisal rights and similar rights of dissenters are not available to shareholders in connection with proposals brought before the Annual Meeting.
|
5
| Q: |
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
|
| A: |
The Board of Directors will announce the voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will also publish the results in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the date of the Annual Meeting. We will file that report with the SEC, and you can get a copy:
|
| · |
by contacting the Company’s corporate offices via phone at (240) 268-5300 or by e-mail at ir@rexahn.com; or
|
| · |
through the SEC’s EDGAR system at
www.sec.gov
.
|
6
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN SECURITY HOLDERS
The table below sets forth the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of April 18, 2018 by the following individuals or entities:
| · |
each director and nominee;
|
| · |
each named executive officer identified in the Summary Compensation Table; and
|
| · |
all current directors and executive officers as a group.
|
As of April 18, 2018, no person or group of affiliated persons is known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding Common Stock.
As of April 18, 2018, 31,744,439 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding. All persons named in the table below have sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of Common Stock that could be acquired by the exercise of stock options within 60 days of April 18, 2018 are deemed outstanding, while such shares are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing percentage ownership of any other person. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, the address for each person named below is c/o Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
|
Shares of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
|
||||||||
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares
|
Percentage
|
||||||
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
|
||||||||
|
Peter Suzdak
|
477,948
|
(1)
|
1.5
|
%
|
||||
|
Charles Beever
|
65,500
|
(2)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Kwang Soo Cheong
|
64,800
|
(3)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Peter Brandt
|
75,500
|
(4)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Mark Carthy
|
50,500
|
(5)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Richard J. Rodgers
|
45,500
|
(6)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Tae Heum Jeong
|
171,125
|
(7)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Ely Benaim
|
158,393
|
(8)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Lisa Nolan
|
70,281
|
(9)
|
*
|
|||||
|
Douglas J. Swirsky
|
-
|
*
|
||||||
|
All current executive officers and directors as a group (9 persons)
|
1,008,422
|
(10)
|
3.2
|
%
|
||||
| * |
Represents less than 1% of the issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (1) |
Includes Dr. Suzdak’s options to purchase 455,698 shares of Common Stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (2) |
Includes Mr. Beever’s options to purchase 64,500 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
7
| (3) |
Includes Dr. Cheong’s options to purchase 64,500 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (4) |
Includes Mr. Brandt’s options to purchase 60,500 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (5) |
Includes Mr. Carthy’s options to purchase 50,500 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (6) |
Includes Mr. Rodgers’ options to purchase 45,500 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (7) |
Includes Dr. Jeong’s options to purchase 119,050 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (8) |
Includes Dr. Benaim’s options to purchase 156,018 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (9) |
Includes Dr. Nolan’s options to purchase 68,656 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
| (10) |
Includes options to purchase 965,872 shares of
Common Stock
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
April 18
, 2018
.
|
8
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Five director nominees have been nominated for election at the Annual Meeting to serve a one-year term until the next Annual Meeting in 2019. All of the nominees currently serve on the Board of Directors. All nominees have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. Mark Carthy, who currently serves as a director, is not standing for reelection.
The Board of Directors recommends that the nominees listed below be elected as directors. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will not be a candidate or will be unable to serve. However, in the event that any of the nominees should become unable or unwilling to serve as a director, the persons named in the proxy have advised that they will vote (unless authority has been withdrawn) for the election of such person or persons as shall be designated by management.
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our nominees for directors. All of the director nominees are currently members of the Board of Directors.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Peter Brandt
|
61
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
Peter Suzdak
|
59
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
Charles Beever
|
65
|
Director
|
|
Kwang Soo Cheong
|
57
|
Director
|
|
Richard J. Rodgers
|
51
|
Director
|
Peter Brandt
. Mr. Brandt has served as our Chairman since June 2015 and as director since September 2010. From February 2011 to early 2013, Mr. Brandt served on the Board of Directors and, in December 2012, became Chairman of the Board of Directors of ePocrates, Inc., a point of care medical applications company, which was acquired by athenahealth, Inc. Also, from November 2011 until March 2012, Mr. Brandt served as interim Chief Executive Officer and President of ePocrates, Inc. Mr. Brandt served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and as a member of the Board of Directors of Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company, from early 2008 until Noven’s acquisition by Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. in August 2009. Prior to leading Noven, Mr. Brandt spent 28 years at Pfizer, the world’s largest pharmaceutical company. He served as Pfizer’s President – U.S. Pharmaceuticals Operations, where he helped deliver revenue and earnings growth while engineering major change within Pfizer’s U.S. pharmaceuticals organization. Prior to running U.S. operations, he led Pfizer’s Latin American pharmaceuticals operations, as well as the following Pfizer Worldwide Pharmaceuticals functions: finance, information technology, planning and business development. He also oversaw the operations of Pfizer’s care management subsidiary, Pfizer Healthcare Solutions. Mr. Brandt served as a director of Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Auxilium”) from December 2010 to January 2015, at which time Auxilium was acquired by Endo International PLC. Mr. Brandt holds a B.A. from the University of Connecticut and an M.B.A. from the Columbia School of Business. Mr. Brandt contributes his broad operational management experience in the life sciences industry and experience serving on numerous boards of directors of life sciences companies to the Board of Directors.
9
Peter Suzdak
. Dr. Suzdak joined us as Chief Executive Officer in February 2013, and has served as a director since June 2013. Dr. Suzdak has over 25 years of diverse experience, including several management positions, in the pharmaceutical industry. Most recently, Dr. Suzdak was Chief Scientific Officer of Corridor Pharmaceuticals, a company developing small molecule compounds to treat pulmonary and vascular disorders, from 2010 to 2013. Prior to Corridor Pharmaceuticals, he was co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer of Cardioxyl Pharmaceuticals, a company focused on therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, from 2006 to 2009. Prior to Cardioxyl Pharmaceuticals, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Artesian Therapeutics, a company engaged in the development of small molecule therapeutics for cardiovascular diseases, from 2002 to 2005. Dr. Suzdak’s experience also includes his position as Senior Vice President of Research and Development of Guilford Pharmaceuticals, a company that developed therapeutics and diagnostics for neurological diseases and cancer, from 1995 to 2002, and as Director of Neurobiology for Novo Nordisk from 1988 to 1995. Dr. Suzdak holds a Ph.D. in pharmacology and toxicology from the University of Connecticut. Dr. Suzdak contributes his extensive pharmacology, clinical development, business development, and pharmaceutical management experience, including his day-to-day leadership of the Company, to the Board of Directors.
Charles Beever
. Mr. Beever has served as a director since May 2006. From 1993 to June 2015, he was a Vice President of PwC Strategy&, a global strategy consulting firm, formerly Booz & Company and Booz Allen Hamilton (“Booz Allen”), Prior to being elected Vice President of Booz Allen in 1993, he served as staff member and Engagement Manager at Booz Allen from January 1984 to October 1993. Prior to joining Booz Allen, Mr. Beever served in various management roles at McGraw-Edison Company. Mr. Beever holds a B.A. in Economics from Haverford College, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Beever contributes extensive managerial and business experience to the Board of Directors.
Kwang Soo Cheong
. Dr. Cheong has served as a director since May 2006. He is a faculty member at the Department of Finance of the Johns Hopkins University Carey Business School, where he was an Assistant Professor from 2001 to 2005 and has been an Associate Professor from 2006 to date. Dr. Cheong was an Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Hawaii from 1994 to 2001, and a lecturer at the Department of Economics of Stanford University from 1993 to 1994. During the summer of 1995, Dr. Cheong was a Visiting Fellow in the Taxation and Welfare Division at the Korea Development Institute in Korea. Dr. Cheong holds a B.A. in Economics and an M.A. in Economics from Seoul National University, and a Ph.D. in Economics from Stanford University. Dr. Cheong’s distinguished academic career focused on finance and economics contributes to the Board of Directors’ perspective.
Richard J. Rodgers
. Mr. Rodgers has served as a director since December 2014.
In addition to his board seat with the Company, Mr. Rodgers currently serves on the Board of Directors of Ardelyx, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, and 3-V Biosciences, Inc., a clinical stage pharmaceutical company. Mr. Rodgers was previously Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of TESARO, Inc., an oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company that he co-founded, from March 2010 until August 2013. He served as the Chief Financial Officer from June 2009 to February 2010 of Abraxis BioScience, which was subsequently acquired by Celgene. Prior to that, Mr. Rodgers served as Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of MGI PHARMA, from 2004 until its acquisition by Eisai in January 2008. He has held finance and accounting positions at several private and public companies, including Arthur Anderson. Mr. Rodgers received a B.S. in Financial Accounting from St. Cloud State University and his MBA in Finance from the University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Business. Mr. Rodgers’ contributes extensive financial and industry experience to the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the director nominees.
10
Executive Officers
In addition to Peter Suzdak, whose information is included above, set forth below are our executive officers:
Douglas J. Swirsky
.
Mr. Swirsky, 48, has served as President, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Secretary since January 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Swirsky was most recently President, CEO and a director of GenVec, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnology company, a position he held from 2013 through the sale of the company in 2017. He joined GenVec in 2006 as Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining GenVec, Mr. Swirsky was a Managing Director and the Head of Life Sciences Investment Banking at Stifel Nicolaus from 2005 to 2006 and held investment banking positions at Legg Mason from 2002 until Stifel Financial’s acquisition of the Legg Mason Capital Markets business in 2005. He has also previously held investment banking positions at UBS, PaineWebber and Morgan Stanley. Mr. Swirsky is on the board of directors of Fibrocell Science, Inc., Cellectar Biosciences, Inc., and Pernix Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. Mr. Swirsky is a certified public accountant and a CFA® charter holder. He received his B.S. in Business Administration from Boston University and his M.B.A. from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University
.
Ely Benaim
. Dr. Benaim, 57, has served as Chief Medical Officer since February 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Benaim was Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs & Chief Medical Officer of BERG, LLC, a biopharmaceutical company, from June 2013 to January 2015. Prior to joining BERG, LLC, from March 2011 to June 2013, Dr. Benaim was Global Clinical Development Leader at Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., where he oversaw global clinical development of the Aurora A kinase inhibitor program. Prior to joining Millennium, Dr. Benaim served as Vice President of Clinical Affairs for Sangamo BioSciences, where he lead the development of zinc-fingers transcription factors cellular therapies in the areas of Cancer, Diabetes, Neurology, Cardiovascular and HIV. Before Sangamo, Dr. Benaim served at Amgen as Global Clinical Lead for clinical development across several drug development programs. Prior to Amgen he was a Senior Director, Oncology Clinical Development at Salmedix, Inc., where he led the development of TREANDA® to a Phase 3 pivotal trial for lymphoma. Dr. Benaim received his M.D. from the Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas and completed his pediatric residency training at the University of South Florida. He completed fellowships in pediatric oncology and bone marrow transplantation at St. Jude's Children's Research Hospital, in Memphis, Tennessee. From 1997 to 2004, he was Assistant Professor in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Tennessee and an Assistant Member to the Department of Hematology/Oncology.
Lisa Nolan
.
Dr. Nolan, 55, has served as Chief Business Officer since June 2016. Prior to this, she served as Chief Business Officer of Relmada Therapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company, from April 2015 to June 2016. From March 2010 through June 2016. Dr. Nolan served as Managing Director of Nolex Advisors, LLC, a business development and management consultancy firm, where she led successful competitive processes for out-licensing of early and late-stage pharmaceutical products. Over the course of her career, Dr. Nolan has held various leadership roles at biopharmaceutical companies including Chief Business Officer at Topigen Pharmaceuticals, where she led the acquisition of Topigen by Pharmaxis. Additionally, she served as Vice President, Global Business Development and Strategic Marketing for SkyePharma Inc., where she completed over a dozen out-licensing deals in the U.S. and Europe with deal values ranging in excess of $500 million. Dr. Nolan holds a Ph.D. in clinical pharmacology and a M.Sc., and B.Sc., in pharmacy from Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland.
11
Director Independence
Our Common Stock is listed on NYSE American. We use the NYSE American definition of “Independent Director” in determining whether a director is independent in his capacity as a director and in his capacity as a member of a board committee. For the Audit Committee, we additionally use Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Each director serving on the Audit Committee must also comply with the following additional NYSE American requirements:
(a)
the director must not have participated in the preparation of our financial statements or any current subsidiary at any time during the past three years; and
(b)
the director must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including our balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.
We currently have a total of six directors, five of whom are Independent Directors. Our Independent Directors are Messrs. Brandt, Beever, Carthy and Rodgers and Dr. Cheong. As Mr. Carthy is not standing for re-election, there will be a total of four independent directors should all of our director nominees be elected.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board of Directors does not have a policy on whether the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be separate or combined. However, at the present time, these roles are separate. The Board of Directors believes that utilizing separate individuals as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will provide for additional leadership and management perspective as we progress in the development of our drug candidates. Four of our five director nominees are independent and each of our standing committees (Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation) is comprised solely of independent directors. We believe this structure provides adequate oversight of Company operations by our independent directors in conjunction with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
The Audit Committee has primary responsibility for oversight of risk management on behalf of the
Board of Directors
. Management reports to the Audit Committee on matters relating to risk management and the Audit Committee and management communicate directly with the full Board of Directors on these matters.
Board of Directors and Board of Directors Meetings
The Board of Directors held seven meetings during the year ended December 31, 2017. Each current director attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of which they were members during the period in which he or she served as a director during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Any shareholder who wishes to send any communications to the Board of Directors or to individual directors should deliver such communications to our executive offices, 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Attention: Corporate Secretary (secretary@rexahn.com). Any such communication should indicate whether the communication is intended to be directed to the entire Board of Directors or to a particular director(s), and must indicate the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the shareholder. The Secretary will forward appropriate communications to the Board of Directors and/or the appropriate director(s), but will not forward inappropriate communications. Inappropriate communications include correspondence that does not relate to our business or affairs or the functioning of the Board of Directors or its committees, advertisements or other commercial solicitations or communications, and communications that are frivolous, threatening, illegal or otherwise not appropriate for delivery to directors.
12
Members of the Board of Directors are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting if they are available. All members of the Board of Directors in office at the time attended the Annual Meeting held in 2017.
Board of Directors Committees
The Board of Directors has three standing committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which is composed of three members. Each of these committees has a charter that is available on our website at
www.rexahn.com
.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee Charter provides that such committee, among other things:
| · |
appoints or replaces and oversees our independent auditors and approves all audit engagement fees and terms;
|
| · |
preapproves all audit (including audit-related) services, internal control-related services and permitted non-audit services (including fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by our independent auditors;
|
| · |
reviews and discusses with our management and independent auditors significant issues regarding accounting and auditing principles and practices and financial statement presentations;
|
| · |
reviews and approves our procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters; and
|
| · |
reviews and oversees our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
|
Mr. Rodgers, Dr. Cheong, and Mr. Beever serve as members of the Audit Committee. Mr. Rodgers serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that both Mr. Rodgers and Dr. Cheong are qualified audit committee financial experts within the meaning of applicable SEC regulations. Each of the current members meets the criteria for independence required by NYSE American and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Audit Committee met five times.
13
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter provides that such committee, among other things:
| · |
reviews, evaluates and seeks out candidates qualified to become Board of Directors members;
|
| · |
reviews committee structure and recommends directors for appointment to committees;
|
| · |
develops, reevaluates (not less frequently than every three years) and recommends the selection criteria for Board of Directors and committee membership;
|
| · |
establishes procedures to oversee evaluation of the Board of Directors, its committees, individual directors and management; and
|
| · |
develops and recommends guidelines on corporate governance.
|
Mr. Brandt, Mr. Beever, and Dr. Cheong currently serve as members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Brandt serves as Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s members meets the criteria for independence required by NYSE American.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews, evaluates and seeks out candidates qualified to become Board of Directors members. The Board of Directors currently includes individuals with a diversity of experience, including scientific, business, financial and academic backgrounds. However, while diversity relating to background, skill, experience and perspective is one factor considered in the nomination process, we do not have a formal policy relating to diversity. Nominations may be submitted by directors, officers, employees, shareholders and others for recommendation to the Board of Directors. In fulfilling this responsibility, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also consults with the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer concerning director candidates. While we do not have in place formal procedures by which shareholders may recommend director candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, shareholders may communicate with the members of the Board of Directors, including the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, by writing to the Secretary of the Board of Directors at our headquarters address. Candidates submitted by directors and management, as well as candidates recommended by stockholders, are evaluated in the same manner as other candidates identified to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, our Amended and Restated Bylaws establish a procedure with regard to shareholder proposals for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors. Because shareholders have an adequate opportunity to recommend nominees for directors, we believe that formal procedures are not necessary. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met once.
14
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee Charter provides that such committee, among other things:
| · |
fixes salaries of executive officers and reviews salary plans for other executives in senior management positions;
|
| · |
reviews and makes recommendations with respect to the compensation and benefits for non-employee directors, including through equity-based plans;
|
| · |
evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives and assists the Board of Directors in developing and evaluating potential candidates for executive positions; and
|
| · |
administers the incentive compensation, deferred compensation and equity-based plans pursuant to the terms of the respective plans.
|
The Compensation Committee may delegate this authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more of its members.
Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding our business goals and the performance of executives in achieving those goals, and recommends other executives’ compensation levels to the Compensation Committee based on such performance. The Compensation Committee considers these recommendations and then makes an independent decision regarding officer compensation levels and awards.
As part of determining compensation for our executive officers, the Compensation Committee has engaged Radford, an AON Hewitt Consulting company, as its independent compensation consultant. Radford provides analysis and recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding:
| · |
trends and emerging topics with respect to executive compensation;
|
| · |
peer group selection for executive compensation benchmarking;
|
| · |
compensation practices for our peer group;
|
| · |
compensation programs for executives; and
|
| · |
stock utilization and related metrics.
|
When requested, Radford consultants attend meetings of the Compensation Committee. Radford reports to the Compensation Committee and not to management, although Radford confers with management for purposes of gathering information for its analyses and recommendations.
In determining to engage Radford, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of Radford, and determined that Radford and the individual compensation advisors employed by Radford are independent.
Mr. Beever, Mr. Rodgers and Mr. Brandt currently serve as members of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Beever serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Each of the members meets the criteria for independence required by NYSE American. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee met four times.
15
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Compensation Discussion & Analysis
This Compensation Discussion & Analysis addresses the principles underlying our policies and decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers who are named in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, or our “named executive officers,” and material factors relevant to these policies and decisions. It should be read together with the related tables and disclosures that follow. Our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2017 were:
| · |
Peter Suzdak, our Chief Executive Officer
|
| · |
Tae Heum Jeong, our former Chief Financial Officer
|
| · |
Ely Benaim, our Chief Medical Officer
|
| · |
Lisa Nolan, our Chief Business Officer
|
During 2017, the above individuals were the only individuals who served as executive officers.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our primary objectives with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers are to attract top executive talent, and to retain and motivate our existing executives because we believe they have experience and competencies that are critical to achievement of our business goals. We seek to achieve these objectives by:
| · |
Establishing the components of our compensation packages at competitive levels.
This means using comparative market data to target overall compensation levels, with a focus on cash conservation that results in cash compensation at or below the 50
th
percentile.
|
| · |
Using an annual variable incentive compensation that is tied to specific corporate goals.
Our annual incentive program is focused on motivating our executives to achieve Company-wide goals that are tied to our strategic plan.
|
| · |
Using equity awards that vest over time and deliver greater value as our stock price increases
. We use equity awards in order to align our named executive officers’ interests with the interest of our shareholders in increasing long-term shareholder value.
|
Strong Compensation Practices
Our compensation program features a number of practices designed to align further the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders.
Practices we employ:
| · |
We pay for performance
. Compensation tied to Company performance
comprises a significant part of an executive’s total compensation
. Performance is used for determining the size of both short-term and long-term awards.
|
| · |
We target pay competitively.
We seek to target pay to verifiable market data in order to ensure that we are both paying fairly and not overpaying our executives.
|
| · |
We use an independent compensation consultant
. The Compensation Committee uses Radford to help verify market and best practices.
|
| · |
We have meaningful vesting periods.
Beginning with awards made in 2015, equity awards used for our long-term incentive program typically vest over four years.
|
16
Practices we do not employ:
| · |
We do not provide for excessive perquisites
. We do not provide any perquisites to our named executive officers, except for de minimis amounts of additional life insurance for Dr. Jeong and Dr. Nolan.
|
| · |
We do not offer guaranteed bonuses
. We do not pay annual bonuses without achievement of performance goals, regardless of the reason for the failure to achieve performance goals, and we retain the flexibility to take into account overall Company performance in determining whether to pay bonuses.
|
| · |
We do not permit hedging
. We prohibit profiting from short-term speculative swings in the value of our stock through “short sales”, “put” and “call” options, and hedging transactions.
|
Compensation Setting Process
Determination of Compensation
.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors makes compensation decisions regarding our named executive officers. Our compensation program and the compensation arrangements and packages we have for our named executive officers have been influenced over the last several years by our change from a company led by our founder to a company led by a new chief executive officer and other new executive officers. As those changes occurred, the Compensation Committee determined that it would be appropriate to have a more structured and competitive compensation program. As a result of that decision, in mid-2014 the Compensation Committee engaged Radford as an independent compensation consultant to provide advice on the overall compensation program, as well as information regarding market and best practices. We used the information provided by Radford in 2014 for setting 2015 and 2016 compensation. At the end of 2016 the Committee received a report from Radford, which we used to help set 2017 compensation.
When making decisions about compensation for the named executive officers other than Dr. Suzdak, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of Dr. Suzdak regarding their performance and the Committee’s compensation consultant, as well as its industry experience and business judgment. Dr. Suzdak does not make recommendations with respect to his own compensation.
The Compensation Committee also intends to consider the outcome of say on pay votes when making executive compensation decisions in the future. In the last shareholder vote, approximately 86% of the votes cast on the “say on pay” proposal were voted in favor of that proposal. The Compensation Committee believes that this overwhelming majority of votes cast, which was an increase over the prior year, affirms shareholders’ support for the judgment of the Compensation Committee in setting executive compensation and, as a result, did not set or change 2017 executive compensation as a direct result of the prior shareholder vote.
17
Independent Compensation Consultant
.
Radford, as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, provides analysis and recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding:
| · |
trends and emerging topics with respect to executive compensation;
|
| · |
peer group selection for executive compensation benchmarking;
|
| · |
compensation practices for our peer group;
|
| · |
compensation programs for executives; and
|
| · |
stock utilization and related metrics.
|
When requested, Radford consultants attend meetings of the Compensation Committee. Radford reports to the Compensation Committee and not to management, although Radford confers with management for purposes of gathering information for its analyses and recommendations.
Comparative Framework
.
As discussed above, as part of its consideration of executive officer compensation for 2017, the Compensation Committee used a comparative framework provided by Radford that was consistent with the framework initially developed with the assistance of Radford in 2014. This framework blends equally information from the proxy statements of a peer group of companies and from survey data assembled by Radford in order to come up with a competitive market composite against which compensation can be measured. The survey data used for the competitive market composite in advance of setting compensation for 2017 was based on public biopharmaceutical companies having fewer than 100 employees and a market capitalization of between $14 million and $230 million and was taken from the Radford 2016 Global Life Sciences Survey.
To develop the peer group of companies, the Compensation Committee, with assistance from Radford, considered the stage of product development, market capitalization and other key business metrics of biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies. The selected peer group consisted of the following companies:
|
Actinium Pharmaceuticals
|
GlycoMimetics, Inc.
|
Ocera Therapeutics
|
|
ArQule
|
GTx
|
Soligenix
|
|
AVEO Pharmaceuticals
|
Heat Biologics
|
Stemline Therapeutics
|
|
Cerulean Pharmaceuticals
|
Kura Oncology
|
Tokai Pharmaceuticals
|
|
CytRx
|
MEI Pharma
|
TRACON Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Endocyte
|
Mirati Therapeutics
|
Verastem
|
|
Fate Therapeutics
|
Neuralstem
|
In 2016, when this peer group was confirmed by the Compensation Committee for use in setting 2017 compensation, none of these companies had active product candidates more advanced than Phase 3 and our market capitalization was at approximately the 24
th
percentile of the group.
Components of our Compensation Program
The compensation program for our named executive officers consists of base salary, annual variable incentives under our short-term incentive (“STI”) program and long-term incentives, for which we currently use stock option awards. Our named executive officers are also entitled to certain compensation upon termination of their employment. We believe these different forms of compensation provide appropriate incentives to achieve our business goals within the context of our overall philosophy for compensation.
It is the objective of the Compensation Committee to generally establish compensation for our named executive officers so that base salary and short-term incentive target opportunities are at or below the 50
th
percentile of the competitive market composite, with long-term incentive opportunities between the 50
th
and the 75
h
percentile of the competitive market composite, subject to downward adjustment to reflect prior performance. The Compensation Committee believes these targets are consistent with our philosophy discussed above of establishing compensation at competitive levels in order to attract and retain high performing executives, while focusing on opportunities to align our named executive officers’ interests with the interest of our shareholders in increasing long-term shareholder value.
18
Base Salary.
The base salary payable to each named executive officer is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting the executive’s skill set, experience, roles and responsibilities.
For 2017, each of the named executive officers received increases in salary consistent with benchmarking recommendations from the 2016 report delivered to the Committee by Radford. Dr. Suzdak and Dr. Jeong’s salaries previously had been increased in mid-2014 and set at the 25
th
percentile of the competitive market composite at the time. When we hired Dr. Benaim in 2015 and Dr. Nolan in 2016, their base salaries were set at amounts resulting from the negotiations necessary to attract them and reflected approximately the 50
th
percentile of the competitive market composite data being used by the Company at the time as part of its executive compensation program.
The named executive officers’ 2017 salaries generally fell in line with the percentage benchmarks previously used for the applicable named executive officer.
Short-term Incentive Program
.
General.
Our STI program is intended to provide a cash incentive to our named executive officers for achieving Company-wide goals approved at the beginning of each year by the Compensation Committee. We believe that having an annual STI program provides an important and customary retention tool and motivates our executives to achieve the specific goals that are a part of the program. The Compensation Committee establishes a set bonus target expressed as a percentage of salary for each named executive officer and established goals for the STI program. After the conclusion of the year, the Compensation Committee determines at what level the goals were achieved.
Target Payout.
The STI program is structured so that achievement of the Company-wide goals at a level of 100% would result in the named executive officer receiving an STI target payment
in an amount equal to
a specified percentage of his or her base salary. The target percentages were equal to 50%, 35%, 40% and 35% for Dr. Suzdak, Dr. Jeong, Dr. Benaim and Dr. Nolan, respectively.
These percentages were consistent with the 50
th
percentile of the competitive market composite provided by Radford in 2016.
Accordingly, because these percentages are expressed as a percentage of base salaries, the STI payment opportunities for Dr. Suzdak and Dr. Jeong are lower than the 50
th
percentile of the competitive market composite.
Company-wide Goals.
For 2017, the Compensation Committee established three categories of Company-wide goals. This approach of using Company-wide goals reflects our belief that if the primary focus of our named executive officers is the achievement of Company-wide goals that are shared across the organization, then we will increase the likelihood of achieving our strategic plan. However, in order to take into account individual performance, the Compensation Committee established different weighting for each named executive officer based on their areas of responsibility. For 2017, the Compensation Committee selected the following goals:
| 1. |
Clinical and Scientific Goals, the purpose of which was to advance the clinical status of compounds in the portfolio (weighted 40% for Dr. Suzdak, 50% for Dr. Benaim, 30% for Dr. Jeong and 40% for Dr. Nolan):
|
19
| · |
Complete Stage 2 of RX-3117 Phase 1b/2a clinical proof-of-concept trial in pancreatic cancer
|
| · |
Determine maximum tolerated dose of RX-3117 in combination with Abraxane®
|
| · |
Complete Stage 1 of RX-3117 Phase 2a clinical trial in bladder cancer
|
| · |
Complete enrollment of RX-5902 (Supinoxin) Phase 2a clinical trial in triple negative breast cancer
|
| · |
Complete RX-0201 (Archexin) Phase 2a clinical trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
|
| · |
Complete filing of RX-5902 solubility enhancing derivative patent application and synthesize/characterize related drug conjugate
|
| 2. |
Financial and Strategic Goals, the purpose of which was to end the year with a longer cash ‘runway’ than at the beginning of the year (weighted 40% for Dr. Suzdak, 30% for Dr. Benaim 50% for Dr. Jeong, and
40
% for Dr. Nolan):
|
| · |
Complete a corporate partnership for specified product candidates
|
| · |
Complete additional financings
|
| · |
Target greater than 12 months of cash on hand at year end
|
| 3. |
Operational goals, the purpose of which was to have effective operations (weighted 20% for each named executive officer):
|
| · |
Meet or exceed expense and cash management targets based on 2017 budget, including introducing practices to improve overall productivity
|
| · |
Build a stronger organization
|
Achievement of Company-wide Goals and Payout.
In early 2017, the Compensation Committee assessed our progress on the Company-wide goals and determined the amounts earned under the STI program. The Committee determined that progress had been made on the clinical goals, but the goals related to the RX-3117 clinical trial with Abraxane and the RX-0201 Phase 2a clinical trial had not been completed by the end of the year. The Committee determined for the financial and strategic goals that while we had completed two financings in 2017 and met targets for cash on hand, a corporate partnership had not been completed.
The Committee determined that the operational goals were fully met based on continued strong improvements to the organization and our achievement of our budget expectations. The Committee’s assessment of the goal completion, as well as its overall assessment of the performance of the named executive officers, resulted in an STI payout for Dr. Suzdak of 70% of his target (or 35% of his base salary), 70% for Dr. Jeong (or 24.5% of his base salary), 85% for Dr. Benaim (or 34% of his base salary), and 70% for Dr. Nolan (or 24.5% of her base salary).
20
The table below shows each executive officer’s target STI award and the amount earned under the STI plan.
The STI awards were paid in cash.
|
Name
|
Target STI Payout
|
Earned STI
Award
Percentage
|
Earned STI Award
Value
|
|||||||||
|
Peter Suzdak
|
$
|
225,000
|
70
|
%
|
$
|
157,500
|
||||||
|
Tae Heum Jeong
|
$
|
105,000
|
70
|
%
|
$
|
73,500
|
||||||
|
Ely Benaim
|
$
|
160,000
|
85
|
%
|
$
|
136,000
|
||||||
|
Lisa Nolan
|
$
|
113,750
|
70
|
%
|
$
|
79,625
|
||||||
Long-term Incentive Program.
Our use of equity awards is intended to align our named executive officers’ interests with the interest of our shareholders by providing an incentive to our named executive officers to increase long-term shareholder value. Furthermore, we believe that in the biopharmaceutical industry, equity awards are a primary motivator to retain executives. For 2017, we used a mix of stock options and restricted stock units for equity awards. We determine the size, mix and frequency of the awards based on numerous factors, including the executive’s skills and experience, the executive’s responsibilities, performance in the prior year and the approach to setting compensation described under “—Determination of Compensation” above.
In January 2017, the Compensation Committee granted a mix of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to Dr. Suzdak, Dr. Jeong, Dr. Benaim and Dr. Nolan. RSUs were awarded in 2017 for the first time in order to provide named executive officers with awards that have immediate in-the-money value, to encourage retention, and increase the direct alignment with stockholder interests. The Compensation Committee granted these awards 75% as stock options and 25% as RSUs by value, which reflects the Committee’s view of the balance of providing incentives to our executives to achieve future stock price appreciation with the benefits of RSUs. In determining the size of the awards, the Committee considered market composite data and generally adjusted awards downward to reflect each executive’s 2016 performance with respect to the goals under the 2016 short-term incentive plan, balanced by a view of the executive’s future potential.
All of the stock options and RSUs issued to the named executive officers vest over a four year-period, with the first installment vesting on the first anniversary of the award in the case of stock options and on the last business day of the month following the first anniversary of the award in the case of RSUs.
Employment Agreements.
At the time each of our named executive officers joined the Company, we entered into employment agreements with them. Dr. Jeong’s agreement was subsequently amended in 2010 to reflect developments in our business. These agreements were designed to be a part of a competitive compensation package for a publicly traded company and to keep our named executive officers focused on our business goals and objectives. The agreements are described in detail in the narrative disclosure following the Summary Compensation Table below. On December 11, 2017, Dr. Jeong informed us of his resignation from the Company effective March 15, 2018, and entered into an agreement with us to formalize the terms of his resignation and to provide for an arrangement pursuant to which Dr. Jeong has agreed to provide transition and advisory services through March 15, 2019.
Payments on Termination.
Pursuant to their employment agreements, each of our named executive officers is entitled to specified benefits in the event of the termination of their employment under specified circumstances, including termination following a change of control of the Company. The terms of these arrangements are more fully described below under “Employment Agreements” and “Potential Payments Upon a Termination or Change in Control.” We believe these protections are appropriate for the senior executives of a biopharmaceutical company such as the Company, including because of the level of acquisition activity in this industry. We believe that providing benefits in the event of a change of control of the Company allows our named executive officers to focus their attention on building our business rather than on the personal implications of a transaction.
21
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE SOLICITING MATERIAL AND SHOULD NOT BE DEEMED FILED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY OTHER FILING BY US UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT WE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATE THIS REPORT.
The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors
of the Company has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (including through incorporation by reference to this Proxy Statement).
|
By the Compensation Committee:
|
|
|
Charles Beever (Chairman)
|
|
|
Richard J. Rodgers
|
|
|
Peter Brandt
|
22
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the annual and long-term compensation, from all sources, for our named executive officers for services rendered in all capacities to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, except as noted below. Our named executive officers include our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer during 2017 and the two other executive officers that served as executive officers during 2017. The compensation described in this table does not include medical or other benefits which are available generally to all of our salaried employees.
|
Name and Principal Position(s)
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)
|
Option
Awards
($
)
(1)(2)
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
($)
(2)(3)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peter D. Suzdak
Chief Executive Officer
|
2017
|
450,000
|
--
|
46,000
|
135,743
|
157,500
|
16,489
|
805,732
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
430,000
|
--
|
-
|
229,581
|
150,500
|
14,010
|
824,091
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
430,000
|
--
|
-
|
629,484
|
-
|
12,947
|
1,072,431
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tae Heum Jeong
Former Chief Financial Officer
|
2017
|
300,000
|
-
|
11,592
|
34,658
|
73,500
|
15,557
|
435,307
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
295,000
|
-
|
-
|
22,958
|
61,950
|
13,736
|
393,644
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
295,000
|
-
|
-
|
185,342
|
-
|
12,947
|
493,289
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ely Benaim
(4)
Chief Medical Officer
|
2017
|
400,000
|
--
|
17,480
|
51,987
|
136,000
|
16,300
|
621,767
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
375,000
|
100,000
|
-
|
114,791
|
120,000
|
13,983
|
723,774
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
343,750
|
50,000
|
-
|
606,590
|
61,875
|
96,586
|
1,158,801
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lisa Nolan
(5)
Chief Business Officer
|
2017
|
325,000
|
-
|
11,960
|
36,391
|
79,625
|
16,027
|
469,003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
156,513
|
-
|
-
|
192,870
|
38,220
|
12,024
|
399,627
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
Reflects grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
|
| (2) |
The actual value realized by each officer with respect to option awards will depend on the difference between the market value of our Common Stock on the date the option is exercised and the exercise price. For 2015, option awards reflect options awarded as an equity grant as a long-term incentive in addition to amounts paid in respect of the portion of 2015 short-term incentive awards that was delivered in equity.
|
| (3) |
For 2015, non-equity incentive awards for Dr. Suzdak and Dr. Jeong, and a portion of the award for Dr. Benaim, were paid by delivery of additional stock options. See the discussion in footnote 2 above.
|
| (4) |
Dr. Benaim joined us in February 2015. His 2015 salary represents salary for the portion of 2015 during which he was our employee.
|
| (5) |
Dr. Nolan joined us in July 2016. Her 2016 salary represents salary for the portion of 2016 during which she was our employee.
|
23
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
This table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to each of our named executive officers during 2017:
|
Name
|
Award Type
|
Grant
Date
|
Estimated Future
Payouts
Under
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards (Target)
($)
|
All
Other
Stock Awards: Number
of Units
of Stock
(#)
|
All Option Awards:
Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
|
Exercise
or Base
Price of Option Awards ($/Share)
(1)
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value of Stock
and
Option Awards
($)
(2)
|
|||||||
|
Peter Suzdak
|
STI Award
|
|
225,000
|
|||||||||||
|
RSUs
|
1/20/2017
|
25,000
|
46,000
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock Options
|
1/20/2017
|
117,500
|
1.84
|
135,743
|
||||||||||
|
Tae Heum
Jeong
|
STI Award
|
|
105,000
|
|||||||||||
|
RSUs
|
1/20/2017
|
6,300
|
11,592
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock Options
|
1/20/2017
|
30,000
|
1.84
|
34,658
|
||||||||||
|
Ely Benaim
|
STI Award
|
|
160,000
|
|||||||||||
|
RSUs
|
1/20/2017
|
9,500
|
17,480
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock Options
|
1/20/2017
|
45,000
|
1.84
|
51,987
|
||||||||||
|
Lisa Nolan
|
STI Award
|
|
113,750
|
|||||||||||
|
RSUs
|
1/20/2017
|
6,500
|
11,960
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock Options
|
1/20/2017
|
31,500
|
1.84
|
36,391
|
| (1) |
Amounts represent the closing price of our Common Stock as reported on NYSE American on the grant date.
|
| (2) |
Reflects the grant date fair value of each award computed in accordance with ASC 718. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers.
|
Narrative Disclosure Relating to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
For an explanation of the amount of salary, bonus, stock and option awards and other compensation paid to our named executive officers, please see “–Compensation Discussion & Analysis–Components of Our Compensation Program” above
and “–Employment Agreements” below, as well as the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.
Employment Agreements
We have employment agreements with each of our named executive officers.
24
Effective as of February 4, 2013, we entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Suzdak to serve as our Chief Executive Officer for a term of two years with the option to renew the employment agreement for additional one-year periods thereafter until terminated. Pursuant to the employment agreement, we agreed to pay Dr. Suzdak an initial annual base salary of $330,000, with the option of a discretionary annual cash bonus of up to 40% of his base salary, as determined by performance against objectives and milestones set by the Board of Directors. The employment agreement also provided for an initial grant of 120,000 options to purchase shares of our Common Stock, and that the Board of Directors may award him additional options each year. In the event Dr. Suzdak’s employment is terminated by reason of disability or for “cause,” as defined in the employment agreement, we will pay Dr. Suzdak his base salary owed up to the termination date, including payment for any unused vacation days. If we terminate Dr. Suzdak’s employment without cause or Dr. Suzdak terminates his employment with “Good Reason,” as defined below, then Dr. Suzdak’s stock options will be subject to accelerated vesting to the extent to which they would have vested within the 12 months following termination and we shall pay Dr. Suzdak a lump sum equal to his then-current annual base salary, an amount equal to the pro-rata portion of the bonus that he otherwise would have been entitled to, and COBRA premiums for 12 months, if he makes a timely election and is eligible for coverage. In the event we terminate Dr. Suzdak’s employment without cause or Dr. Suzdak terminates his employment with Good Reason within the one-year period following a “Change of Control,” as defined in the 2013 Plan, we shall pay Dr. Suzdak a lump sum equal to 200% of his current annual base salary, a cash payment to offset any incremental additional state or federal income tax payable as a result of this salary increase, the pro rata portion of his bonus and COBRA premiums for 18 months if he makes a timely election. Dr. Suzdak’s equity awards would also vest and become exercisable in connection with the Change of Control. A resignation by Dr. Suzdak is deemed a resignation for “Good Reason” if he provides written notice to the Company of the specific circumstances alleged to constitute Good Reason within 90 days after any one or more of the following events and such Good Reason is not cured within 30 days of our receipt of such notice:
| · |
a material diminution in his duties or authority inconsistent with his position;
|
| · |
a change in his reporting from solely and directly to the Board of Directors;
|
| · |
a material reduction of his salary or bonus eligibility;
|
| · |
requiring him to be based at any office that is more than 40 miles from our office at the time of the signing of the agreement; or
|
| · |
any material breach by the Company of the terms and provisions of the agreement.
|
The employment agreement also contains a provision prohibiting Dr. Suzdak from soliciting our executives, employees, customers or clients for a period of 12 months following his termination.
On September 9, 2010, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Dr. Jeong to serve as our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. Dr. Jeong’s agreement provided for an initial annual base salary of $200,000. The agreement provided for an initial term of three years, with an automatic one year renewal upon the expiration of the initial term and every year thereafter unless the officer’s employment was terminated earlier by the Company or the officer. The agreement provided that Dr. Jeong would receive an annual cash bonus and an annual option grant in such amounts, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Any such cash bonus was required to be paid to Dr. Jeong within 60 days after the date the Compensation Committee determined to award such bonus. In order to receive any such cash bonus, Dr. Jeong must have been actively employed by the Company on the date on which such bonus was scheduled to be paid. The agreement also provided that upon the occurrence of any of the following events, the Compensation Committee would meet and determine in its discretion whether Dr. Jeong should be entitled to receive an additional bonus in consideration of his role in bringing about such events:
25
| · |
our completion of a successful end-of-Phase 2 meeting with the Food and Drug Administration for any drug candidate;
|
| · |
our completion of pivotal trials of any drug candidate;
|
| · |
our filing of a New Drug Application with the Food and Drug Administration with respect to any drug candidate;
|
| · |
the approval by the Food and Drug Administration of a New Drug Application filed therewith by the Company with respect to any drug candidate;
|
| · |
our receipt of additional equity or debt financing; or
|
| · |
our execution of an agreement that may lead to the payment to the Company of up-front or milestone payments.
|
The agreement entitled Dr. Jeong to receive customary benefits applicable to our other executive level employees, and in addition to receive term life insurance coverage in an amount equal to four times base salary, for which Dr. Jeong may designate the beneficiary.
On December 11, 2017, Dr. Jeong informed us of his resignation from the Company effective March 15, 2018, and we entered into an agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) to formalize the terms of Dr. Jeong’s resignation and to provide for an arrangement pursuant to which Dr. Jeong has agreed to provide transition and advisory services through March 15, 2019, including assistance with financial reporting, financial matters, strategic planning, investor relations and business development activities. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Dr. Jeong’s resignation was treated under his employment agreement as a termination as a result of his death, disability, for cause by us, or without “Good Reason” by Dr. Jeong. As a result, he was entitled to receive the base salary to which he is otherwise entitled for the period ending on the termination date and for any accrued but unused vacation days as of the termination date. In addition, pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Dr. Jeong will receive total cash compensation of $100,000, payable in four equal installments, as consideration for the transition and advisory services thereunder, and all outstanding equity awards granted to Dr. Jeong by the Company will continue to vest in accordance with their terms until March 15, 2019 or such earlier date on which the Separation Agreement is terminated.
If Dr. Jeong’s employment had been terminated for any other reason by us or with Good Reason by Dr. Jeong, but not following a change of control, then he would have been entitled to receive the base salary to which he was otherwise entitled for the period ending on the termination date and for any accrued but unused vacation days as of the termination date and an amount equal to his then-current base salary for the period beginning on the termination date ending upon the last day of the employment term.
A resignation by Dr. Jeong would have been deemed a resignation for “Good Reason” if he had provided written notice to us of the specific circumstances alleged to constitute Good Reason within 90 days after any one or more of the following events and such Good Reason was not cured within 30 days of our receipt of such notice:
| · |
a material diminution in his duties, responsibilities or authority inconsistent with his position, authority, duties or responsibilities;
|
26
| · |
a change in his reporting from solely and directly to our Chief Executive Officer;
|
| · |
a material reduction of his salary;
|
| · |
requiring him to be based at any office that is more than 40 miles from our office at the time of the signing of the agreement; or
|
| · |
any material breach by the Company of the terms and provisions of the agreement.
|
If Dr. Jeong’s employment would have been terminated by the Company without cause (and not as a result of death or a disability) and such termination date fell within the one-year period immediately following a “Change of Control,” as defined in our 2013 Stock Option Plan
, as amended and restated
(the “2013 Plan”), then he would have been entitled to receive the following amounts: (i) the base salary to which he was otherwise entitled for the period ending on the termination date and for any accrued but unused vacation days as of the termination date; (ii) an amount equal to the greater of (x) twice his then-current base salary and (y) his then-current base salary for the period beginning on the termination date and ending upon the last day of the employment term; (iii) an amount equal to a pro-rata portion of the bonus to which he otherwise might have been entitled, assuming for such purposes that he would have received a bonus for that year equal to half of his then-current base salary; (iv) a one-time cash payment, subject to applicable withholding requirements under applicable state and federal law, in an amount equal to his increased income tax costs as a result of payments made to him by the Company under this change of control provision of the amended and restated employment agreement; and (v) COBRA premiums for 18 months, if he made a timely election and was eligible for coverage. Following a change in control termination, Dr. Jeong was required in good faith to seek other employment in a position comparable to his former position with the Company. Our payment obligations would have been reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the amount of any payments and the value of any benefits received by Dr. Jeong for services rendered to any other party during the one-year period following the date of the change in control. Immediately prior to a change in control, all options, restricted stock and other equity-based awards granted to Dr. Jeong by the Company would have become immediately and fully vested and, in the case of stock options, would have remained exercisable for their respective original terms.
Effective as of February 2, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Benaim to serve as our Chief Medical Officer. Pursuant to the employment agreement, we agreed to pay Dr. Benaim an initial annual base salary of $375,000, a signing bonus of $50,000, and a discretionary annual cash bonus of up to 40% of his base salary, based on a program and criteria established by the Compensation Committee. The employment agreement also provided for an initial grant of 120,000 options to purchase shares of our Common Stock. In the event Dr. Benaim’s employment is terminated by reason of disability or for “cause,” as defined in the employment agreement, we will pay Dr. Benaim his base salary owed up to the termination date, including payment for any unused vacation days. If we terminate Dr. Benaim’s employment without cause or Dr. Benaim terminates his employment with good reason, then Dr. Benaim’s stock options will be subject to accelerated vesting to the extent to which they would have vested within the 12 months following termination and we shall pay Dr. Benaim a lump sum equal to his then-current annual base salary, an amount equal to the pro-rata portion of the bonus that he otherwise might have been entitled to, and COBRA premiums for 12 months, if he makes a timely election. A resignation by Dr. Benaim is deemed a resignation for “Good Reason” if he provides written notice to the Company of the specific circumstances alleged to constitute Good Reason within 90 days after any one or more of the following events and such Good Reason is not cured within 30 days of our receipt of such notice:
27
| · |
a material diminution in his duties, responsibilities or authority inconsistent with his position, authority, duties or responsibilities;
|
| · |
a material reduction in his annual base salary or target bonus percentage; or
|
| · |
any material breach by the Company of the terms and provisions of the agreement.
|
In the event we terminate Dr. Benaim’s employment without cause or Dr. Benaim terminates his employment with Good Reason within the one-year period following a “Change of Control,” as defined in the 2013 Plan, we shall pay Dr. Benaim a lump sum equal to his then-current annual base salary, the pro rata portion of his bonus, and COBRA premiums for 18 months if he makes a timely election. Dr. Benaim’s equity awards would also vest and become exercisable in connection with the Change of Control. The employment agreement also contains a provision prohibiting Dr. Benaim from soliciting our executives, employees, customers or clients for a period of 12 months following his termination.
Effective as of July 6, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Nolan to serve as our Chief Business Officer. Pursuant to the employment agreement, we agreed to pay Dr. Nolan an initial annual base salary of $320,000 and a discretionary annual cash bonus of up to 35% of her base salary, based on a program and criteria established by the Compensation Committee. The employment agreement also provided for an initial grant of 120,000 options to purchase shares of our Common Stock. In the event Dr. Nolan’s employment is terminated by reason of disability or for “cause,” as defined in the employment agreement, we will pay Dr. Nolan her base salary owed up to the termination date, including payment for any unused vacation days. If we terminate Dr. Nolan’s employment without cause or Dr. Nolan terminates her employment with good reason, then Dr. Nolan’s stock options will be subject to accelerated vesting to the extent to which they would have vested within the nine months following termination and we shall pay Dr. Nolan a lump sum equal to her then-current annual base salary, an amount equal to the pro-rata portion of the bonus that she otherwise might have been entitled to, and COBRA premiums for nine months, if she makes a timely election. A resignation by Dr. Nolan is deemed a resignation for “Good Reason” if she provides written notice to the Company of the specific circumstances alleged to constitute Good Reason within 90 days after any one or more of the following events and such Good Reason is not cured within 30 days of our receipt of such notice:
| · |
a material diminution in her duties, responsibilities or authority inconsistent with his position, authority, duties or responsibilities;
|
| · |
a material reduction in her annual base salary or target bonus percentage; or
|
| · |
any material breach by the Company of the terms and provisions of the agreement.
|
In the event we terminate Dr. Nolan’s employment without cause or Dr. Nolan terminates her employment with Good Reason within the one-year period following a “Change of Control,” as defined in the 2013 Plan, we shall pay Dr. Nolan a lump sum equal to her then-current annual base salary, the pro rata portion of her bonus, and COBRA premiums for 18 months if she makes a timely election. Dr. Nolan’s equity awards would also vest and become exercisable in connection with the Change of Control. The employment agreement also contains a provision prohibiting Dr. Nolan from soliciting our executives, employees, customers or clients for a period of 12 months following her termination.
28
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows the certain information regarding outstanding equity awards the named executive officers and which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number of Units of Stock
that Have Not Vested
(7)
|
Market Value of Units of
Stock that Have Not
Vested ($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peter Suzdak
|
120,000
|
-
|
3.70
|
2/4/2023
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
35,000
|
-
|
11.40
|
1/12/2024
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
75,000
|
25,000
|
(1)
|
8.30
|
9/4/2024
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
55,000
|
55,000
|
(2)
|
7.10
|
1/23/2025
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
41,168
|
-
|
3.50
|
1/28/2026
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
47,916
|
52,084
|
(3)
|
3.50
|
1/28/2026
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
117,500
|
(4)
|
1.84
|
1/20/2027
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
25,000
|
50,500
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Tae Heum Jeong
|
25,000
|
-
|
7.80
|
12/11/2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
25,000
|
-
|
3.10
|
3/1/2023
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
17,500
|
-
|
11.40
|
1/12/2024
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
16,666
|
16,667
|
(2)
|
7.10
|
1/23/2025
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
9,885
|
-
|
3.50
|
1/28/2026
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
4,791
|
5,209
|
(3)
|
3.50
|
1/28/2026
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
30,000
|
(4)
|
1.84
|
1/20/2027
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,300
|
12,726
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Ely Benaim
|
85,000
|
35,000
|
(5)
|
7.10
|
2/2/2025
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
9,873
|
-
|
3.50
|
1/28/2026
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
23,958
|
26,042
|
(3)
|
3.50
|
1/28/2026
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
45,000
|
(4)
|
1.84
|
1/20/2027
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,500
|
19,190
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Lisa Nolan
|
42,500
|
77,500
|
(6)
|
2.60
|
7/6/2026
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
31,500
|
(4)
|
1.84
|
1/20/2027
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,500
|
13,130
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
Represents option awards granted under the 2013 Plan on September 4, 2014, which vested 25% on September 4, 2015, 2016 and 2017, and will vest 25% on September 4, 2018.
|
| (2) |
Represents option awards granted under the 2013 Plan on January 23, 2015, which vested 25% on January 23, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and will vest 25% on January 23, 2019.
|
| (3) |
Represents option awards granted under the 2013 Plan on January 28, 2016, which vested 25% on January 28, 2017, and one forty-eighth of which vested or will vest on the first business day of each month beginning February 2017 and ending January 2020.
|
| (4) |
Represents option awards granted under the 2013 Plan on January 20, 2017, which vested 25% on January 20, 2018, and one forty-eighth of which vested or will vest on the first business day of each month beginning February 2018 and ending January 2021.
|
| (5) |
Represents option awards granted under the 2013 Plan on February 2, 2015, which will vest 25% on February 2, 2016, and one forty-eighth of which will vested or will vest on the first business day of each month beginning March 2016 and ending February 2019.
|
| (6) |
Represents option awards granted under the 2013 Plan on July 6, 2016, which will vest 25% on July 6, 2017, and one forty-eighth of which will vested or will vest on the first business day of each month beginning August 2017 and ending July 2020.
|
| (7) |
Represents restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2013 Plan on January 20, 2017, which vested 25% on February 28, 2018 and the remainder of which will vest in three equal annual installments on the last business day in February, beginning February 28, 2019.
|
29
Potential Payments upon a Termination or Change in Control
As discussed under the caption “Employment Agreements” above, we have agreements with our named executive officers pursuant to which they will receive severance payments upon certain termination events. The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that would have been available under our existing plans and arrangements if (i) the named executive officer were terminated as of December 31, 2017 or (ii) if a “Change of Control,” as defined herein, had occurred on December 31, 2017 and the named executive officer had been subsequently terminated on that date.
Termination by Death, Disability or for Cause; Resignation without Good Reason
In the event that we terminated a named executive officer’s employment as of December 31, 2017 for any reason other than for cause, death, or disability, or if the named executive officer resigned without Good Reason as of December 31, 2017, such officer would have been entitled to his accrued base salary to which he is otherwise entitled for the period ending on the termination date and his base salary for any accrued but unused vacation days as of the termination date. Dr. Jeong’s resignation effective March 15, 2018 was treated as a termination other than for cause, death, or disability or a resignation without Good Reason.
Termination Other than for Cause, Death or Disability; Resignation with Good Reason
Assuming a December 31, 2017 termination event, the aggregate value of the payment and benefits to which each named executive officer would have been entitled in the event that the named executive officer’s employment was terminated by the Company for any reason other than for cause, death, or disability, or if the named executive officer had resigned for Good Reason, would have been as follows:
|
Name
|
Cash
Severance
|
Bonus
($) (2)
|
Benefits and
Health
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||
|
Peter Suzdak
|
450,000
|
225,000
|
22,300
|
697,300
|
||||||||||||
|
Tae Heum Jeong
|
206,819
|
-
|
11,538
|
218,357
|
||||||||||||
|
Ely Benaim
|
400,000
|
160,000
|
28,760
|
588,760
|
||||||||||||
|
Lisa Nolan
|
325,000
|
113,750
|
-
|
438,750
|
||||||||||||
| (1) |
For Drs. Suzdak, Benaim and Nolan, this amount represents 100% of the executive’s then-current annual base salary. For Dr. Jeong, this amount represents the amount of his then-current base salary for the period beginning on the termination date and ending on September 9, 2018, the last day of his then-current term.
|
| (2) |
This amount represents the target bonus of Drs. Suzdak, Dr. Benaim and Dr. Nolan of 50%, 40% and 35%, respectively, of then-current annual base salary.
|
| (3) |
This amount represents COBRA premiums for 12 months after the termination date for Drs. Suzdak and Benaim, assuming timely COBRA elections are made by the executive. For Dr. Jeong, the amount represents the salary which he was entitled to for any accrued but unused vacation days.
|
30
Termination Following a “Change of Control”
Assuming a December 31, 2017 Change of Control and termination event on that date for any reason other than cause, death or disability, or if the named executive officer resigned for Good Reason as of that date, the aggregate value of the payment and benefits to which each named executive officer would have been entitled would have been as follows:
|
Name
|
Cash
Severance
($) (1)
|
Bonus
($) (2)
|
Benefits and
Health
Programs
($) (3)
|
Tax
Gross-Up
($) (4)
|
Value of All
Accelerated
Equity
($) (5)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Peter Suzdak
|
900,000
|
225,000
|
33,450
|
-
|
71,650
|
1,230,100
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Tae Heum Jeong
|
600,000
|
150,000
|
34,249
|
71,000
|
18,126
|
873,375
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Ely Benaim
|
400,000
|
160,000
|
43,140
|
-
|
27,290
|
630,430
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Lisa Nolan
|
487,500
|
113,750
|
-
|
-
|
18,800
|
620,050
|
||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
This amount represents 200% of the then-current annual base salary for Drs. Suzdak and Jeong, 100% of the then-current annual base salary for Dr. Benaim, and 150% of the then current base salary for Dr. Nolan.
|
| (2) |
This amount represents the target bonus for Drs. Suzdak, Benaim and Nolan of 50%, 40% and 35%, respectively, of then-current annual base salary, and an assumed bonus for Dr. Jeong equal to 50% of his then-current annual base salary.
|
| (3) |
This amount represents COBRA premiums for 18 months after the termination date, assuming timely elections are made. For Dr. Jeong, this amount also includes an amount equal to the salary to which he was entitled for any accrued but unused vacation days.
|
| (4) |
For Dr. Jeong, this amount represents an amount equal to increased income tax as a result of other payments made to each by the Company in connection with the termination under his employment agreement.
|
| (5) |
Assuming a December 31, 2017 Change of Control, the value of all equity awards that would vest and become exercisable for each named executive officer would be as follows:
|
|
Name
|
Value of
Stock
Options
($) (1)
|
Value of
Restricted
Stock Units
($)(2)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||
|
Peter Suzdak
|
21,150
|
50,500
|
71,650
|
|||||||||
|
Tae Heum Jeong
|
5,400
|
12,726
|
18,126
|
|||||||||
|
Ely Benaim
|
8,100
|
19,190
|
27,290
|
|||||||||
|
Lisa Nolan
|
5,670
|
13,130
|
18,800
|
|||||||||
| (1) |
The value of stock options upon vesting acceleration is calculated based on the closing price as of December 31, 2017 of $2.02 per share with respect to unvested stock options subject to acceleration, less the exercise price of these unvested options. The actual value will vary depending on the date the options are exercised.
|
| (2) |
The value of restricted stock options upon vesting acceleration is calculated based on the closing price as of December 31, 2017 of $2.02 per share with respect to unvested restricted stock units subject to acceleration.
|
31
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are presenting the ratio of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation to our median employee’s annual total compensation.
In order to identify our median employee for purposes of calculating the ratio, based on our internal records, we calculated a reasonable estimate of the annual compensation for each employee other than our CEO using a compensation measure that included the following elements: annual cash compensation for the 12-month period ended on December 31, 2017, including base salary and our annual incentive program, and the fair value of equity-based awards granted for that period. Our employee population as of December 31, 2017, which was the group used for purposes of identifying our median employee, consisted of 16 full-time employees, excluding our CEO.
As set forth in the Summary Compensation Table appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement,
the 2017 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for our Chief Executive Officer was $805,732. The 2017 annual total compensation for our median employee was $184,871. The ratio of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation to our median employee’s total compensation for 2017 is 4.36 to 1. This ratio was determined using reasonable estimates as permitted by the SEC’s rules and should not be used as a comparison with pay ratios disclosed by other companies.
Director Compensation
The table below sets forth information concerning the compensation of our directors for the year ended December 31, 2017, except for Dr. Suzdak, whose compensation is disclosed above.
|
Name
|
Fees Earned Or
Paid In Cash ($)
|
Equity
Awards ($)
(1)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total ($)
|
||||||||||||
|
Chang H. Ahn
(2)(3)
|
-
|
51,004
|
254,242
|
305,246
|
||||||||||||
|
Peter Brandt
|
67,500
|
45,006
|
-
|
112,506
|
||||||||||||
|
Charles Beever
|
52,500
|
45,006
|
-
|
97,506
|
||||||||||||
|
Mark Carthy
|
43,750
|
45,006
|
-
|
88,756
|
||||||||||||
|
Kwang Soo Cheong
|
46,250
|
45,006
|
-
|
91,256
|
||||||||||||
|
Richard J. Rodgers
|
55,000
|
45,006
|
-
|
100,006
|
||||||||||||
| (1) |
Grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The actual value realized with respect to option awards will depend on the difference between the market value of our Common Stock on the date the option is exercised and the exercise price. As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Beever and Dr. Cheong each had 64,500 option awards outstanding; Mr. Brandt had 60,500 option awards outstanding; Mr. Carthy had 50,500 option awards outstanding; and Mr. Rodgers had 45,500 option awards outstanding.
|
| (2) |
As our employee during the period in which Dr. Ahn served on the Board of Directors in 2017, Dr. Ahn earned no compensation for his work on the Board of Directors. The amounts specified under the “All Other Compensation” column for Dr. Ahn reflect a salary of $241,411, $9,656 in retirement plan contributions and other compensation totaling $3,175 as a Company employee.
|
| (3) |
Dr. Ahn resigned from the Board of Directors on August 31, 2017.
|
32
Elements of Non-Employee Director Compensation
Our director compensation program is designed to attract and retain qualified, independent directors to represent shareholders on the Board and act in their best interest. The Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, has primary responsibility for setting our director compensation program. Radford assists the Compensation Committee in evaluating our director compensation program.
Based on its review of an assessment by Radford regarding director compensation, in 2015, the Board approved a new director compensation policy in order to position the applicable elements of compensation closer to the competitive median of the peer group used for the purposes of director compensation. In addition, certain compensation practices, including payment of additional compensation to the Chairman of the Board, additional equity grants for new directors, and payment in retainer fees rather than meeting-based fees were instituted to align better with prevailing market practices. The non-employee director compensation structure is as follows:
|
Position
|
Compensation
*
|
|
Director
|
$35,000 per annum, plus an additional $25,000 for the Chairman of the Board
|
|
Audit Committee (Chairman)
|
$15,000 per annum
|
|
Audit Committee (Member)
|
$7,500 per annum
|
|
Compensation Committee (Chairman)
|
$10,000 per annum
|
|
Compensation Committee (Member)
|
$5,000 per annum
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chairman)
|
$7,500 per annum
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Member)
|
$3,750 per annum
|
| * |
Paid semi-annually.
|
As part of the director compensation structure, each incumbent non-employee director currently receives an annual equity grant based on the equity value of the grant with a target of approximately $42,000, based on the Black-Scholes valuation of our Common Stock, as previously recommended by Radford in connection with its 2015 assessment. In addition, aggregate annual director compensation payable in equity is currently limited for each director to no more than $250,000.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Such executive officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports filed by such reporting persons. We believe that during 2017, all such reports were filed with the SEC on a timely basis.
33
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, in accordance with applicable federal securities laws and as required by NYSE American. The Code of Ethics is available on our corporate website at
www.rexahn.com
.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Audit Committee charter requires that the Audit Committee review and approve all proposed transactions between the Company and any director, officer or other employee of the Company, and any holder of five percent or more of our voting capital stock, in order to ensure that any such transaction is on an arm’s length basis and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations and the requirements of any exchange on which our securities may be listed from time to time. Based on our review of our transactions, there have been no transactions or proposed transactions considered to be related person transactions since January 1, 2017.
34
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Board of Directors of the Company has appointed an Audit Committee composed of three directors, each of whom meets the independence, qualification and experience requirements under the listing standards of NYSE American, Section 10A(m)(3) of the Exchange Act and applicable rules of the SEC. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. A copy of the Charter is available on the Company’s website at
www.rexahn.com
.
The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to provide assistance and guidance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities to the Company’s shareholders with respect to (1) the Company’s corporate accounting and reporting practices, (2) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence (4) the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements and reports, (5) reviewing and approving all audit engagement fees and terms, as well as all non-audit engagements with the independent auditors, and (6) producing this report. The Audit Committee members are not professional accountants or auditors and these functions are not intended to replace or duplicate the activities of management or the independent auditors. Management has primary responsibility for preparing the financial statements and designing and assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management is responsible for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and internal controls and procedures that provide for compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Baker Tilly
Virchow Krause, LLP (“Baker Tilly”)
, the Company’s independent auditing firm, is responsible for planning and carrying out an audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”)
, expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, reviewing the Company’s quarterly financial statements prior to the filing of each quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and other procedures.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with both management and with the Company’s independent registered auditors for 2017.
The Audit Committee has discussed with
Baker Tilly
the matters required under PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and letter from
Baker Tilly
required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding
Baker Tilly
’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with
Baker Tilly
its independence.
Both the Company’s management and auditors responded appropriately to issues raised by the Audit Committee. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee determined that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for filing with the SEC.
|
By the Audit Committee:
|
|
|
Richard J. Rodgers (Chairman)
|
|
|
Charles Beever
|
|
|
Kwang Soo Cheong
|
35
PROPOSAL 2
:
RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for the ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP (“Baker Tilly”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. Baker Tilly has no direct or indirect financial interest in the Company. A representative of Baker Tilly is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
If the shareholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee may consider other independent public accountants or continue the appointment of Baker Tilly.
Fees
The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for the audits of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||
|
Audit Fees
1
|
$
|
219,960
|
$
|
189,735
|
||||
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
|
Tax Fees
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
|
All Other Fees
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
(1) Audit Fees relate to the audit of our financial statements, reviews of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters requested for our financing, and the auditor consents to registration statements.
All audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent accountant must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate to one of its members or a subcommittee of the Audit Committee the authority to grant pre-approvals with respect to non-audit services. For audit services, each year the independent accountant provides the Audit Committee with an engagement letter outlining the scope of proposed audit services to be performed during the year. This letter must be formally accepted by the Audit Committee before the audit commences. The independent accountant also submits an audit services fee proposal, which also must be approved by the Audit Committee before the audit commences.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.
36
PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FROM 50,000,000 TO 100,000,000
The Board of Directors has unanimously approved, and recommended that our shareholders approve, an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, in substantially the form attached hereto as
Annex A
(the “Certificate of Amendment”) (in the event it is deemed by the Board to be advisable), to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000. If the shareholders approve the authorized share amendment, the authorized share increase will become effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
As of April 18, 2018, there were 31,744,439 shares of our Common Stock outstanding. In addition, as of the same date, 3,724,425 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance under our equity compensation plans, and 7,099,609 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of our warrants to purchase Common Stock. Accordingly, there are 7,431,527 shares of Common Stock available for general corporate purposes, prior to the addition of the shares for which we are seeking approval pursuant to this proposal.
Although at present the Board of Directors has no specific plans to issue shares of Common Stock in excess of the number currently authorized, the Board believes the availability of additional authorized but unissued shares will provide us with greater flexibility to issue Common Stock for a variety of corporate purposes, without the delay and expense associated with convening a special meeting of shareholders. The additional shares may be used for various purposes, including, without limitation, raising capital and expanding our business or research and development programs through the acquisition of other businesses or products.
If the shareholders approve the proposed amendment, the Board may cause the issuance of the additional shares of Common Stock without further approval, except as may be required by law, regulatory authorities, or the rules of NYSE American or any other stock exchange on which our shares may be listed. The issuance of additional shares of Common Stock could have the effect of diluting existing stockholder earnings per share, book value per share and voting power. Our stockholders do not have any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any part of any new or additional issuance of our securities.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of the Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date will be required to approve the authorized share increase. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes (to the extent a broker does not exercise its authority to vote) will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Shares represented by valid proxies and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions given. If no voting instructions are given, such shares will be voted “FOR” this proposal.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase the Authorized Shares of Common Stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000.
37
PROPOSAL 4: THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE ANNUAL MEETING
Our shareholders are being asked to consider and vote upon an adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes in favor of approval of a proposed amendment to our restated certificate of incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock as described in Proposal 3.
Approval of the adjournment of the Annual Meeting requires an affirmative vote of a majority in interest of the shareholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will count against the proposal.
The Board of Directors Recommends that you vote FOR the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to approve Proposal
3.
38
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Shareholder Proposals Pursuant to Rule 14a-8
Shareholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting may do so by submitting the proposal in writing to our executive offices, 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy statement, shareholder proposals must be received no later than December 24, 2018, which is 120 days prior to the anniversary date of this Proxy Statement. The submission of a shareholder proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in the proxy statement.
Nominations and Shareholder Proposals Under our Bylaws
Our Amended and Restated Bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure with regard to nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors and shareholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting. No shareholder proposal or nomination may be brought before the Annual Meeting unless, among other things, the submission contained certain information concerning the proposal or the nominee, as the case may be, and other information specified in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, and the submission was received by us no earlier than the close of business on February 14, 2018, and no later than March 16, 2018. Proposals or nominations not meeting these requirements will not be entertained at the Annual Meeting. No notice that a shareholder intends to present a proposal or nomination for the Annual Meeting has been received.
No shareholder proposals or nomination may not be brought before the 2019 Annual Meeting unless, among other things, the submission contains certain information concerning the proposal or the nominee, as the case may be, and other information specified in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, and the submission is received by us no earlier than the close of business on February 14, 2019, and no later than March 16, 2019. Proposals or nominations not meeting these requirements will not be entertained at the 2019 Annual Meeting.
Shareholders recommending candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must provide the candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications. Any such recommendation should be accompanied by a written statement from the individual of his or her consent to be named as a candidate and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director. These requirements are separate from, and in addition to, the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in the proxy statement. A copy of the full text of these bylaw provisions may be obtained from our website at
www.rexahn.com
.
AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K
We are providing to each shareholder as of the Record Date a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 concurrently with this Proxy Statement, except the exhibits to the Form 10-K. We will provide copies of these exhibits upon request by eligible shareholders, and we may impose a reasonable fee for providing such exhibits.
Requests for copies of such exhibits or the amount of the fee payable should be requested from our Secretary, Douglas J. Swirsky at 240-268-5300, by mail at 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455, Rockville, Maryland 20850 or by email at ir@rexahn.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our other filings with the SEC, including the exhibits, are also available for free on the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov
.
39
HOUSEHOLDING
If you are a beneficial owner, but not the record holder, of shares of our Common Stock, your broker, bank or other nominee may only deliver one (1) copy of this Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report to multiple shareholders at the same address, unless that nominee has received contrary instructions from one (1) or more of the shareholders. We will deliver, upon request, a separate copy of this Proxy Statement to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A shareholder desiring to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report, now or in the future, should call our Secretary, Douglas J. Swirsky, at 240-268-5300, or submit a request by writing to 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 455, Rockville, Maryland 20850 or by emailing us at ir@rexahn.com. Also, beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and annual reports and who wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all shareholders at the same address in the future.
April 23, 2018
40
Annex A
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify as follows:
1.
The name of the Corporation is Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.
Article 4 of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended to date, is hereby amended by replacing the first paragraph thereof with the following:
The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 110,000,000 shares of the par value of $.0001 each, of which 10,000,000 are to be of a class designated Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) and 100,000,000 shares of the par value of $.0001 each are to be of a class designated Common Stock (the “Common Stock”).
3.
This Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted by the Board of Directors and stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
4.
This Certificate of Amendment shall become effective at ____________ ___.m. Eastern _____________Time on ___________, 201_.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Certificate of Amendment on this __________ day of _________, _________.
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
Title:
|
REXAHN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 14, 2018
The undersigned hereby appoints Peter Suzdak and Douglas J. Swirsky, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with full power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided below, all the shares of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. common stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to be held on June 14, 2018, at 8:00 a.m. (local time), at the Radisson Hotel, 3 Research Court, Rockville, Maryland 20850, or any adjournment thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting.
This proxy is revocable and will be voted as directed, but if no instructions are specified, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the nominees for director named in Proposal 1 and “FOR” Proposals 2, 3, and Proposal 4. If any other business is presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, this proxy will be voted by those named in this proxy in their best judgment.
At the present time, the Board of Directors knows of no other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Please mark, date, sign, and mail your proxy promptly in the envelope provided
IMPORTANT: SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON THE OTHER SIDE
p
PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
p
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held June 14, 2018.
The Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at:
http://www.viewproxy.com/rexahn/2018
Please mark your votes like this THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES IDENTIFIED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4. Proposal 1. Election of Directors FOR WITHHOLD 01 Charles Beever 02 Peter Brandt 03 Kwang Soo Cheong 04 Richard J. Rodgers 05 Peter Suzdak Proposal 2. Ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Proposal 3. Approval of an amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Proposal 4. Approval of the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve Proposal 3. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN I/We plan to attend the meeting: YES NO DO NOT PRINT IN THIS AREA (Shareholder Name & Address Data) NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. CONTROL NUMBER Signature Signature (if held jointly) Date: , 2018 PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. CONTROL NUMBER PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS Please have your 11 digit control number ready when voting by Internet or Telephone INTERNET Vote Your Proxy on the Internet: Go to www.AALvote.com/RNN Have your proxy card available when you access the above website. Follow the prompts to vote your shares. TELEPHONE Vote Your Proxy by Phone: Call 1 (866) 804-9616 Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card available when you call. Follow the voting instructions to vote your shares. MAIL Vote Your Proxy by Mail: Mark, sign, and date your proxy card, then detach it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.
TABLE OF CONTENTS