LOEWS CORP
10-Qs and 10-Ks
PROXIES
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2020
OR
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period From ____________ to _____________
Commission File Number
1-06541
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
☒
(
212
)
521-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
|
|
|
No
☐
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
|
Yes
☐
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|
|
No
☐
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
|
|
|
No
☐
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
☒
|
Accelerated filer
☐
|
Non-accelerated filer
☐
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
☐
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
|
☒
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
Yes
|
|
No
☒
|
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $
8,143,000,000
.
As of February 5, 2021, there were
267,046,558
shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders intended to be filed by the registrant with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
|
Item
|
Page
|
|||
|
No.
|
No.
|
|||
|
1
|
||||
|
5
|
||||
|
9
|
||||
|
13
|
||||
|
14
|
||||
|
14
|
||||
|
15
|
||||
|
15
|
||||
|
1
|
A
|
16
|
||
|
1
|
B
|
42
|
||
|
2
|
42
|
|||
|
3
|
42
|
|||
|
4
|
42
|
|||
|
5
|
43
|
|||
|
6
|
45
|
|||
|
7
|
46
|
|||
|
7
|
A
|
77
|
||
|
8
|
81
|
|||
|
9
|
162
|
|||
|
9
|
A
|
162
|
||
|
9
|
B
|
162
|
||
|
10
|
163
|
|||
|
11
|
163
|
|||
|
12
|
163
|
|||
|
13
|
163
|
|||
|
14
|
163
|
|||
|
15
|
164
|
|||
|
16
|
167
|
|||
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Investors are cautioned that certain statements contained in this Report as well as in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and periodic press releases made by us and our subsidiaries and certain oral statements made by us and our subsidiaries and our and their officers during presentations may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Forward-looking statements include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements may project, indicate or imply future results, events, performance or achievements, and such statements may contain the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. In addition, any statement concerning future financial performance (including future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible actions taken by us or our subsidiaries are also forward-looking statements as defined by the Act. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events and are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our or our subsidiaries’ control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or projected.
Developments in any of the risks or uncertainties facing us or our subsidiaries, including those summarized under the heading “Risk Factors Summary” below and described more fully under Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Report and in our other filings with the SEC, could cause our results to differ materially from results that have been or may be anticipated or projected. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update these statements to reflect any change in our expectations or beliefs or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “Company” as used herein means Loews Corporation including its subsidiaries, the terms “Parent Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or like terms as used herein mean Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries and the term “subsidiaries” means our consolidated subsidiaries.
RISK FACTORS SUMMARY
Our business and the businesses of our subsidiaries face many risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could lead to events or circumstances that have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or equity and/or the business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or equity of one or more of our subsidiaries. You should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors described under Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Report, before investing in any security issued by us. Principal risks facing us and our subsidiaries include those relating to:
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, CNA Financial Corporation (“CNA”)
|
•
|
the impact of the coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) on CNA;
|
|
•
|
CNA may need to increase its insurance reserves if it determines that its recorded reserves are insufficient;
|
|
•
|
CNA’s actual experience could vary from the key assumptions used to determine active life reserves for its long term care policies;
|
|
•
|
CNA’s vulnerability to material losses from natural and man-made disasters or other catastrophes;
|
|
•
|
CNA’s exposure related to asbestos and environmental pollution (“A&EP”) claims;
|
|
•
|
CNA’s exposure to mass tort product liability claims, changes to the social and legal environment, issues related to altered interpretation of coverage and other new and emerging claim theories;
|
|
•
|
CNA’s ability to obtain sufficient reinsurance at a cost or on terms and conditions it deems acceptable;
|
|
•
|
intense competition in CNA’s industry; the cyclical nature of the property and casualty business and the evolving landscape of its distribution network;
|
|
•
|
technological changes or disruptions in the insurance marketplace;
|
|
•
|
potential significant realized and unrealized investment losses and volatility in net investment income;
|
|
•
|
CNA’s use of analytical models in key areas such as pricing, reserving and capital modeling;
|
|
•
|
CNA’s potential inability to detect and prevent significant employee or service provider misconduct, inadvertent errors and omissions, or exposure relating to functions performed on CNA’s behalf;
|
|
•
|
capital adequacy requirements that CNA is subject to;
|
|
•
|
regulatory limitations on CNA’s insurance subsidiaries ability to pay dividends to CNA;
|
|
•
|
potential downgrades of CNA’s ratings by rating agencies; and
|
|
•
|
extensive state, local, federal and foreign governmental regulations to which CNA is subject.
|
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (“Boardwalk Pipelines”)
|
•
|
extensive regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) of natural gas transportation and storage operations;
|
|
•
|
legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to pipeline safety;
|
|
•
|
actual results from its construction and growth projects not meeting its forecasts;
|
|
•
|
legislative and regulatory initiatives related to climate change;
|
|
•
|
the impact of COVID-19 on Boardwalk Pipelines;
|
|
•
|
changes in energy commodity prices and their impact on the supply of and demand for those commodities;
|
|
•
|
the price differentials between natural gas supplies and market demand and the resulting reduction in the transportation rates that Boardwalk Pipelines can charge on certain of its pipelines;
|
|
•
|
Boardwalk Pipelines’ exposure to credit risk relating to default or bankruptcy by its customers;
|
|
•
|
operating and financial covenants in Boardwalk Pipelines’ revolving credit facility;
|
|
•
|
Boardwalk Pipelines’ substantial indebtedness;
|
|
•
|
potential access to the debt markets and increases in interest rates;
|
|
•
|
Boardwalk Pipelines does not own all of the land on which its pipelines and facilities are located;
|
|
•
|
rising sea levels, subsidence and erosion, particularly along coastal waters and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico;
|
|
•
|
Boardwalk Pipelines’ may be unsuccessful in executing its strategy to grow and diversify its business;
|
|
•
|
the impact of market conditions on Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to replace expiring storage contracts at attractive rates or on a long-term basis and to sell short-term services at attractive rates or at all; and
|
|
•
|
Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations are subject to catastrophic losses, operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions for which it may not be adequately insured.
|
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Loews Hotels Holding Corporation (“Loews Hotels & Co”)
|
•
|
the impact of COVID-19 on Loews Hotels & Co;
|
|
•
|
operating risks common to the hospitality industry, including excess supply and dependence on travel and tourism;
|
|
•
|
Loews Hotels & Co’s exposure to risks resulting from significant investments in owned and leased real estate;
|
|
•
|
seasonal and cyclical volatility in the hospitality industry;
|
|
•
|
the high level of competition in the hospitality industry, both for customers and for acquisitions and developments of new properties;
|
|
•
|
the risk of deterioration in the quality or reputation of Loews Hotels & Co’s brands;
|
|
•
|
the potential for delays or increased costs in connection with developing and renovating properties;
|
|
•
|
co-investments in properties, which could decrease Loews Hotels & Co’s ability to manage risk;
|
|
•
|
the geographic concentration of Loews Hotels & Co’s properties;
|
|
•
|
the growth and use of alternative reservation channels;
|
|
•
|
the adequacy of Loews Hotels & Co’s insurance coverage;
|
|
•
|
potential labor shortages; and
|
|
•
|
portions of Loews Hotels & Co’s labor force are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
|
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Altium Packaging LLC (“Altium Packaging”)
|
•
|
the impact of COVID-19 on Altium Packaging;
|
|
•
|
Altium Packaging’s exposure to changes in consumer preferences;
|
|
•
|
Altium Packaging’s substantial indebtedness;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in raw material prices and raw material availability; and
|
|
•
|
self-manufacturing by Altium Packaging’s customers.
|
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiaries Generally
|
•
|
the impact of COVID-19 on the way we and our subsidiaries operate;
|
|
•
|
acts of terrorism;
|
|
•
|
compliance with environmental laws;
|
|
•
|
failures or interruptions in or breaches to our or our subsidiaries’ computer systems;
|
|
•
|
potential loss of key vendor relationships or issues relating to the transitioning of vendor relationships;
|
|
•
|
impairment charges related to the carrying value of long-lived assets and goodwill of our subsidiaries;
|
|
•
|
we are a holding company and derive substantially all of our income and cash flow from our subsidiaries;
|
|
•
|
competition for senior executives and qualified specialized talent; and
|
|
•
|
litigation to which we and our subsidiaries may be subject from time to time.
|
Loews Corporation was incorporated in 1969 and is a holding company. Our subsidiaries are engaged in the following lines of business:
|
•
|
commercial property and casualty insurance (CNA Financial Corporation, an 89.6% owned subsidiary);
|
|
•
|
transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids (Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, a wholly owned subsidiary);
|
|
•
|
operation of a chain of hotels (Loews Hotels Holding Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary); and
|
|
•
|
manufacture of rigid plastic packaging solutions (Altium Packaging LLC, a 99% owned subsidiary).
|
We have five reportable segments comprised of three individual consolidated operating subsidiaries, CNA Financial Corporation, Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP and Loews Hotels Holding Corporation; the Corporate segment; and Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc (“Diamond Offshore”). The Corporate segment is primarily comprised of Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries and the operations of Altium Packaging LLC. Diamond Offshore was deconsolidated during the second quarter of 2020. Each of our operating subsidiaries and Diamond Offshore are headed by a chief executive officer who is responsible for the operation of its business and has the duties and authority commensurate with that position. Additional financial information on each of our segments and the deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore is included under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”).
CNA Financial Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, “CNA”) is an insurance holding company. CNA’s property and casualty and remaining life and group insurance operations are primarily conducted by Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”), The Continental Insurance Company, Western Surety Company, CNA Insurance Company Limited, Hardy Underwriting Bermuda Limited and its subsidiaries (“Hardy”) and CNA Insurance Company (Europe) S.A. CNA accounted for 86.0%, 72.3% and 72.0% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
CNA’s insurance products primarily include commercial property and casualty coverages, including surety. CNA’s services include warranty, risk management, information services and claims administration. CNA’s products and services are primarily marketed through independent agents, brokers and managing general underwriters to a wide variety of customers, including small, medium and large businesses, insurance companies, associations, professionals and other groups. The property and casualty insurance industry is highly competitive, both as it relates to rate and service. CNA competes with a large number of stock and mutual insurance companies, as well as other entities, for both distributors and customers.
Property & Casualty Operations
CNA’s commercial property and casualty insurance operations (“Property & Casualty Operations”) includes its Specialty, Commercial and International lines of business.
Specialty
Specialty provides management and professional liability and other coverages through property and casualty products and services using a network of brokers, independent agencies and managing general underwriters. Specialty includes the following business groups:
Management & Professional Liability
: Management & Professional Liability consists of the following coverages and products:
|
•
|
professional liability coverages and risk management services to various professional firms, including architects, real estate agents, accounting firms and law firms;
|
|
•
|
directors and officers (“D&O”), employment practices, fiduciary and fidelity coverages. Specific areas of focus include small and mid-size firms, public as well as privately held firms and not-for-profit organizations;
|
|
•
|
insurance products to serve the health care industry, including professional and general liability as well as associated standard property and casualty coverages. Key customer groups include aging services, allied medical facilities, dentists, physicians, hospitals, nurses and other medical practitioners.
|
Surety
: Surety offers small, medium and large contract and commercial surety bonds. Surety provides surety and fidelity bonds in all 50 states.
Warranty and Alternative Risks
:
Warranty and Alternative Risks provides extended service contracts and insurance products that provide protection from the financial burden associated with mechanical breakdown and other related losses, primarily for vehicles, portable electronic communication devices and other consumer goods. Service contracts are generally distributed by commission-based independent representatives and sold by auto dealerships and retailers in North America to customers in conjunction with the purchase of a new or used vehicle or new consumer goods. Additionally, CNA’s insurance companies may issue contractual liability insurance policies or guaranteed asset protection reimbursement insurance policies to cover the liabilities of these service contracts issued by affiliated entities or third parties.
Commercial
Commercial works with a network of brokers and independent agents to market a broad range of property and casualty insurance products to all types of insureds, targeting small business, construction, middle markets and other commercial customers. Property products include standard and excess property, marine and boiler and machinery coverages. Casualty products include standard casualty insurance products such as workers’ compensation, general and product liability, commercial auto and umbrella coverages. Most insurance programs are provided on a guaranteed cost basis; however, CNA also offers specialized loss-sensitive insurance programs and total risk management services relating to claim and information services to the large commercial insurance marketplace.
International
International underwrites property and casualty coverages on a global basis through a branch operation in Canada, a European business consisting of two insurance companies based in the United Kingdom and Luxembourg and Hardy, CNA’s Lloyd’s of London (“Lloyd’s”) syndicate.
Property & Casualty Structure
CNA’s commercial property & casualty underwriting operations presence in the United States of America (“U.S.”) consists of field underwriting locations and centralized processing operations which handle policy processing, billing and collection activities and also act as call centers to optimize service. CNA’s claim operations presence in the U.S. consists of primary locations where it handles multiple claim types and key business functions, as well as regional claim offices which are aligned with CNA’s underwriting field structure. CNA has property & casualty underwriting operations in Canada, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Continental Europe, as well as access to business placed at Lloyd’s through Syndicate 382.
Other Insurance Operations
Other Insurance Operations include CNA’s run-off long term care business as well as structured settlement obligations not funded by annuities related to certain property and casualty claimants, certain corporate expenses, including interest on CNA corporate debt, and certain property and casualty businesses in run-off, including CNA Re and A&EP.
Regulation
Current Regulation:
The insurance industry is subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation and supervision. Regulatory oversight by applicable agencies is exercised through review of submitted filings and information, examinations (both financial and market conduct), direct inquiries and interviews. Each domestic and foreign jurisdiction has established supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relative to licensing insurers and agents, approving policy forms, establishing reserve requirements, prescribing the form and content of statutory financial reports and regulating capital adequacy and the type, quality and amount of investments permitted. Such regulatory powers also extend to premium rate regulations requiring rates not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. In addition to regulation of dividends by insurance subsidiaries, intercompany transfers of assets or payments may be subject to prior notice or approval by insurance regulators, depending on the size of such transfers and payments in relation to the financial position of the insurance subsidiaries making the transfers or payments.
As CNA’s insurance operations are conducted in both domestic and foreign jurisdictions, CNA is subject to a number of regulatory agency requirements applicable to a portion, or all, of CNA’s operations. These include but are not limited to, the State of Illinois Department of Insurance (which is CNA’s global group-wide supervisor), the U.K. Prudential Regulatory Authority and Financial Conduct Authority, the Office of Superintendent of Financial Institutions in Canada, the Luxembourg insurance regulator Commissariat aux Assurances and the Bermuda Monetary Authority.
The U.S. and foreign regulatory environment in which CNA operates is evolving on an ongoing basis and impacts aspects of corporate governance, risk management practices, public disclosures and cyber security. CNA continues to invest in the security of its systems and network on an enterprise-wide basis.
Domestic insurers are also required by state insurance regulators to provide coverage to certain insureds who would not otherwise be considered eligible by the insurers. Each state dictates the types of insurance and the level of coverage that must be provided to such involuntary risks. CNA’s share of these involuntary risks is mandatory and generally a function of its respective share of the voluntary market by line of insurance in each state.
Further, domestic insurance companies are subject to state guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments. Guaranty funds are governed by state insurance guaranty associations which levy assessments to meet the funding needs of insolvent insurer estates. Other insurance-related assessments are generally levied by state agencies to fund various organizations including disaster relief funds, rating bureaus, insurance departments, and workers’ compensation second injury funds, and by industry organizations that assist in the statistical analysis and ratemaking process and CNA has the ability to recoup certain of these assessments from policyholders.
Although the U.S. federal government does not currently directly regulate the business of insurance, federal legislative and regulatory initiatives can affect the insurance industry. These initiatives and legislation include proposals relating to terrorism and natural catastrophe exposures, cybersecurity risk management, federal financial services reforms and certain tax reforms.
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019 (“TRIPRA”) provides for a federal government backstop for insured terrorism risks through the end of 2027. The mitigating effect of such law is part of the analysis of CNA’s overall risk posture for terrorism and, accordingly, CNA’s risk positioning may change if such law was modified.
Hardy, a specialized Lloyd’s underwriter, is also supervised by the Council of Lloyd’s, which is the franchisor for all Lloyd’s operations. The Council of Lloyd’s has wide discretionary powers to regulate Lloyd’s underwriting, such as establishing the capital requirements for syndicate participation. In addition, the annual business plan of each syndicate is subject to the review and approval of the Lloyd’s Franchise Board, which is responsible for business planning and monitoring for all syndicates.
The transition period for the U.K’s exit from the European Union (“E.U.”), commonly referred to as “Brexit,” ended on December 31, 2020. To ensure its ability to operate effectively throughout the E.U. following the departure of the U.K. from the trading bloc, effective January 1, 2019, CNA’s E.U. business is no longer written by the U.K.-domiciled subsidiary Hardy, but through a European subsidiary established in Luxembourg. As a result, the complexity and cost of regulatory compliance of CNA’s European business has increased and will likely continue to result in elevated expenses.
Capital adequacy and risk management regulations, referred to as Solvency II, apply to CNA’s European operations and are enacted by the European Commission, the executive body of the E.U. Additionally, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (“IAIS”) continues to develop capital requirements as more fully discussed below.
Regulation Outlook:
The IAIS has adopted a Common Framework (“ComFrame”) for the Supervision of Internationally Active Insurance Groups (“IAIGs”) which is focused on the effective group-wide supervision of internationally active insurance groups, such as CNA. As part of ComFrame, the IAIS is developing a global insurance capital standard for insurance groups. While the general parameters of ComFrame have been finalized, many critical areas of the global insurance capital standard are still under consideration. Certain jurisdictional regulatory regimes are subject to revision in response to these global developments.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) has developed an approach to group capital regulation and solvency-monitoring activities using the Group Capital Calculation (“GCC”). While the current U.S. regulatory regime is based on legal entity regulation, the GCC will quantify risk across the insurance group and also provide additional financial information to regulators to assess the financial condition of non-insurance entities. The GCC was recently adopted by the NAIC along with model legislative language designed to enable the framework once implemented by state legislatures. Alongside the GCC, the NAIC is also working with other interested jurisdictions, both domestic and international, to develop an Aggregation Method (“AM”) approach to assessing group capital. The AM is influenced by the GCC and calculated in a similar manner. By 2024, the IAIS will be assessing whether the AM provides comparable outcomes to the consolidated group insurance capital standard (“ICS”) being developed for use with IAIGs.
There have also been definitive developments with respect to prudential insurance supervision unrelated to the IAIS activities. On September 22, 2017, the U.S. Treasury Department, the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) and the E.U. announced they had formally signed a covered agreement on Prudential Measures Regarding Insurance and Reinsurance (“U.S.-E.U. Covered Agreement”). The U.S.-E.U. Covered Agreement requires U.S. states to prospectively eliminate the requirement that domestic insurance companies must obtain collateral from E.U. reinsurance companies that are not licensed in their state (alien reinsurers) in order to obtain reserve credit under statutory accounting. In exchange, the E.U. will not impose local presence requirements on U.S. firms operating in the E.U., and effectively must defer to U.S. group capital regulation for these firms. On December 18, 2018, the U.S. Treasury Department, the USTR, and the U.K. announced they formally signed the Bilateral Agreement on Prudential Measures Regarding Insurance and Reinsurance (“U.S.-U.K. Covered Agreement”). This Agreement has similar terms as the U.S.-E.U. Covered Agreement.
Because these covered agreements are not self-executing, U.S. state laws will need to be revised to change reinsurance collateral requirements to conform to the provisions within each of the agreements. Both the reinsurance collateral requirement change and adoption of group capital regulation must be effected by the states within five years from the signing of the covered agreements, or states risk federal preemption. CNA will monitor the modification of state laws and regulations in order to comply with the provisions of the covered agreements and assess potential effects on its operations and prospects.
Properties:
CNA’s
principal executive offices are based in Chicago, Illinois. CNA’s subsidiaries maintain office space in various cities throughout the United States and various countries. CNA leases all of its office space.
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (together with its subsidiaries, “Boardwalk Pipelines”) is engaged in the business of natural gas and natural gas liquids and hydrocarbons (herein referred to together as “NGLs”) transportation and storage. Boardwalk Pipelines accounted for 10.3%, 8.7% and 8.7% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
A wholly owned subsidiary of ours, Boardwalk Pipelines Holding Corp. (“BPHC”) owns, directly and indirectly, 100% of the general partner and limited partnership interests of Boardwalk Pipelines.
Boardwalk Pipelines owns and operates approximately 13,650 miles of interconnected natural gas pipelines directly serving customers in 13 states and indirectly serving customers throughout the northeastern and southeastern U.S. through numerous interconnections with unaffiliated pipelines. Boardwalk Pipelines also owns and operates approximately 445 miles of NGL pipelines in Louisiana and Texas. In 2020, its pipeline systems transported approximately 3.2 trillion cubic feet (“Tcf”) of natural gas and approximately 80.6 million barrels (“MMBbls”) of NGLs. Average daily throughput on Boardwalk Pipelines’ natural gas pipeline systems during 2020 was approximately 8.6 billion cubic feet (“Bcf”). Boardwalk Pipelines’ natural gas storage facilities are comprised of fourteen underground storage fields located in four states with aggregate working gas capacity of approximately 213.0 Bcf and Boardwalk Pipelines’ NGL storage facilities consist of 11 salt dome caverns located in Louisiana with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 32.1 MMBbls. Boardwalk Pipelines also owns seven salt dome caverns and related brine infrastructure for use in providing brine supply services and to support the NGL storage operations.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipeline and storage systems are described below:
The Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC (“Gulf South”), effective January 1, 2020, converted from a limited partnership to a limited liability company. Immediately subsequent to the conversion, Boardwalk Pipelines’ Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC, operating subsidiary was merged into Gulf South. The merged pipeline system runs approximately 7,415 miles along the Gulf Coast in the states of Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. The pipeline system has a peak-day delivery capacity of 10.9 Bcf per day and average daily throughput for the year ended December 31, 2020 was 5.6 Bcf per day. Gulf South has ten natural gas storage facilities. The two natural gas storage facilities located in Louisiana and Mississippi have approximately 91.5 Bcf of working gas storage capacity and the eight salt dome natural gas storage caverns in Mississippi have approximately 46.0 Bcf of total storage capacity, of which approximately 29.6 Bcf is working gas capacity. Gulf South also owns undeveloped land which is suitable for up to five additional storage caverns.
The Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (“Texas Gas”) pipeline system, a bi-directional pipeline, runs approximately 5,970 miles and is located in Louisiana, East Texas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio with smaller diameter lines extending into Illinois. The pipeline system has a peak-day delivery capacity of 5.9 Bcf per day and average daily throughput for the year ended December 31, 2020 was 3.0 Bcf per day. Texas Gas owns nine natural gas storage fields with 84.3 Bcf of working gas storage capacity.
Boardwalk Louisiana Midstream, LLC and Boardwalk Petrochemical Pipeline, LLC (collectively “Louisiana Midstream”) provide transportation and storage services for natural gas, NGLs and ethylene, fractionation services for NGLs and brine supply services. These assets provide approximately 48.8 MMBbls of salt dome storage capacity, including approximately 7.6 Bcf of working natural gas storage capacity, significant brine supply infrastructure, and approximately 285 miles of pipeline assets. Louisiana Midstream owns and operates the Evangeline Pipeline
(“Evangeline”), which is an approximately 175 mile interstate ethylene pipeline that is capable of transporting approximately 4.2 billion pounds of ethylene per year between Texas and Louisiana, with interconnections with its ethylene distribution system. Throughput for Louisiana Midstream was 80.6 MMBbls for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Boardwalk Texas Intrastate, LLC (“Texas Intrastate”) provides intrastate natural gas transportation services on approximately 250 miles of pipeline located in South Texas. Texas Intrastate is situated to provide access to industrial and power generation markets as well as liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) export markets and third-party pipelines for exports to Mexico.
In 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines placed into service approximately $335 million of growth projects which represents approximately 1.5 Bcf per day of firm natural gas transportation capacity and additional NGL infrastructure as well as expanding natural gas storage capacity at facilities in Mississippi. Collectively, these projects were completed on-time and within budget. Boardwalk Pipelines expects to spend approximately $380 million on its growth projects currently under construction through 2024. Those projects are expected to serve increased natural gas demand from a power generation plant and liquids demand from petrochemical facilities. All of Boardwalk Pipelines’ growth projects are secured by long-term firm contracts.
Customers:
Boardwalk Pipelines serves a broad mix of customers, including end-use customers, such as local distribution companies, electric power generators, exporters of LNG and industrial users, producers and marketers of natural gas, and interstate and intrastate pipelines, who, in turn, provide transportation and storage services for end-users. These customers are located throughout the Gulf Coast, Midwest and Northeast regions of the U.S. Boardwalk Pipelines’ delivery market has diversified over time, with increased deliveries to end-use customers, whereas, historically its delivery markets were primarily to other pipelines who then delivered to end-use customers.
Governmental Regulation:
The FERC regulates Boardwalk Pipelines’ interstate natural gas transmission operating subsidiaries under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (“NGA”) and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (“NGPA”). The FERC regulates, among other things, the rates and charges for the transportation and storage of natural gas in interstate commerce and the construction, extension, enlargement or abandonment of facilities under its jurisdiction. Where required, Boardwalk Pipelines’ natural gas pipeline subsidiaries hold certificates of public convenience and necessity issued by the FERC covering certain of their facilities, activities and services. The maximum rates that Boardwalk Pipelines’ FERC-regulated subsidiaries may charge for all aspects of the natural gas transportation services they provide, are established through the FERC’s cost-based rate-making process. Key determinants in the FERC’s cost-based rate-making process are the costs of providing service, the volumes of gas being transported, the rate design, the allocation of costs between services, the capital structure and the rate of return a pipeline is permitted to earn. The maximum rates that may be charged by Boardwalk Pipelines for storage services on Texas Gas, except for services associated with a portion of the working gas capacity on that system, are also established through the FERC’s cost-based rate-making process. The FERC has authorized Boardwalk Pipelines to charge market-based rates for its firm and interruptible storage services for the majority of its other natural gas storage facilities. None of Boardwalk Pipelines’ FERC-regulated entities currently have an obligation to file a new rate case and Gulf South is prohibited from filing a rate case until May 1, 2023, subject to certain exceptions. Boardwalk Texas Intrastate transports natural gas in intrastate commerce under the rules and regulations established by the Texas Railroad Commission and in interstate commerce that is subject to FERC jurisdiction under Section 311 of the NGPA. The maximum rates for services are established under Section 311 of the NGPA and are generally subject to review every five years by the FERC.
The Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) regulates the rates Boardwalk Pipelines charges for interstate service on its ethylene pipelines. The Louisiana Public Service Commission (“LPSC”) regulates the rates Boardwalk Pipelines charges for intrastate service within the state of Louisiana on its petrochemical and NGL pipelines. The STB and LPSC require that Boardwalk Pipelines’ transportation rates are reasonable and that its practices cannot unreasonably discriminate among its shippers.
Boardwalk Pipelines is also regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”) through the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended (“NGPSA”) and the Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Safety Act of 1979, as amended (“HLPSA”). The NGPSA and HLPSA govern the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of interstate
natural gas and NGL pipeline facilities. Boardwalk Pipelines has authority from PHMSA to operate certain natural gas pipeline assets under issued permits with specific conditions that allow it to operate those pipeline assets at higher than normal operating pressures of up to 0.80 of the pipeline’s Specified Minimum Yield Strength (“SMYS”). Operating at these pressures allows these pipelines to transport all the existing natural gas volumes Boardwalk Pipelines has contracted for on those facilities with its customers. PHMSA retains discretion whether to grant or maintain authority for Boardwalk Pipelines to operate its natural gas pipeline assets at higher pressures and, in the event that PHSMA should elect not to allow Boardwalk Pipelines to operate at these higher pressures, it could affect its ability to transport all of its contracted quantities of natural gas on these pipeline assets, and Boardwalk Pipelines could incur significant additional costs to reinstate this authority or to develop alternate ways to meet its contractual obligations. PHMSA’s regulations also require transportation pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs to comprehensively evaluate certain high risk areas, known as high consequence areas (“HCAs”), high population areas (also known as moderate consequence areas (“MCAs”)), and Class 3 and Class 4 areas, which are determined by specific population densities near Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines, as well as certain drinking water sources and unusually sensitive ecological areas, along Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines and take additional safety measures to protect people and property in these areas.
Legislation in the past decade has resulted in more stringent mandates for pipeline safety and has charged PHMSA with developing and adopting regulations that impose increased pipeline safety requirements on pipeline operators. In particular, the NGPSA and HLPSA were amended by the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (“2011 Act”) and the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 (“2016 Act”). The 2011 Act increased the penalties for safety violations, established additional safety requirements for newly constructed pipelines and required studies of safety issues that could result in the adoption of new regulatory requirements by PHMSA for existing pipelines. The 2016 Act, among other things, required PHMSA to complete its outstanding mandates under the 2011 Act and develop new safety standards for natural gas storage facilities. Pursuant to the 2016 Act, PHMSA published a final rule in February of 2020 that amended the minimum safety issues related to natural gas storage facilities, including wells, wellbore tubing and casing, which final rule was amended to add applicable reporting requirements and was published in July of 2020. Also, in October of 2019, PHMSA published the first of three expected regulations relating to new or more stringent requirements for certain natural gas pipelines, that had originally been proposed in 2016 as part of PHMSA’s “gas Mega Rule,” which first final rule became effective on July 1, 2020. This regulation imposed numerous requirements, including maximum allowable operating pressure (“MAOP”) reconfirmation through re-verification of all historical records for pipelines in service, which re-certification process may require natural gas pipelines installed before 1970 (previously excluded from certain pressure testing obligations) to be pressure tested, the periodic assessment of additional pipeline mileage outside of HCAs (in MCAs as well as Class 3 and Class 4 areas), the reporting of exceedances of MAOP and the consideration of seismicity as a risk factor in integrity management. Additional amendments to this October 2019 final rule relating to recordkeeping for gas transmission lines were published by PHMSA in July of 2020. Boardwalk Pipelines is currently evaluating the operational and financial impact related to this final rule. The remaining rulemakings comprising the gas Mega Rule have not yet been published, and Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict when they will be finalized; however, they are expected to include revised pipeline repair criteria as well as more stringent corrosion control requirements.
Also, in the Fiscal Year 2021 Omnibus Appropriations Bill passed by Congress and made effective December 27, 2020, the Congress reauthorized PHMSA through fiscal year 2023 and directed the agency to move forward with several regulatory actions, including the “Pipeline Safety: Class Location Change Requirements” and the “Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Transmission and Gathering Pipelines” proposed rulemakings. Congress has also instructed PHMSA to issue final regulations that will require operators of non-rural gas gathering lines and new and existing transmission and distribution pipeline facilities to conduct certain leak detection and repair programs and to require facility inspection and maintenance plans to align with those regulations. New regulations adopted by PHMSA may impose more stringent requirements applicable to integrity management programs and other pipeline safety aspects of Boardwalk Pipelines operations, which could cause it to incur increased capital and operating costs and operational delays.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations are also subject to extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment and occupational health and safety. Such laws and regulations impose, among other things, restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the generation, handling, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of various substances including hazardous substances and waste and in connection with spills,
releases, discharges and emissions of various substances into the environment. Environmental regulations also require that Boardwalk Pipelines’ facilities, sites and other properties be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities. Occupational health and safety regulations establish standards protective of workers, both generally and within the pipeline industry.
Many states where Boardwalk Pipelines operates also have, or are developing, similar environmental or occupational health and safety legal requirements governing many of the same types of activities, and those requirements can be more stringent than those adopted under federal laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these federal, state and local laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of corrective or remedial obligations, the incurrence of capital expenditures, the occurrence of delays, denials or cancellations in permitting or the development or expansion of projects and the issuance of orders enjoining performance of some or all of Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations in the affected areas.
President Biden has indicated that he intends to pursue additional environmental regulations, whether by new legislation, executive actions or regulatory initiatives, which may impact Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations. For example, in recent years, there have been conflicting interpretations of what waterways are subject to jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, with competing rulemakings being developed, and subsequently challenged in courts, by different presidential administrations. The incoming Biden Administration may propose another interpretation of the extent of this jurisdiction, though we cannot predict the likelihood or effects of any such proposal at this time. Similarly, President Biden has announced plans to take action with regards to climate change and signed executive orders to this effect on January 20, 2021 as described under Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Report
.
Historically, Boardwalk Pipelines’ environmental compliance costs have not had a material adverse effect on its business, but there can be no assurance that future compliance with existing requirements will not materially affect Boardwalk Pipelines, or that the current regulatory standards will not become more onerous in the future, resulting in more significant costs to maintain compliance or increased exposure to significant liabilities.
Properties:
Boardwalk Pipelines is headquartered in leased office space located in Houston, Texas. Boardwalk Pipelines also leases office space in Owensboro, Kentucky. Boardwalk Pipelines’ operating subsidiaries own their respective pipeline systems in fee. However, substantial portions of these systems are constructed and maintained on property owned by others pursuant to rights-of-way, easements, permits, licenses or consents.
Loews Hotels Holding Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, “Loews Hotels & Co”) operates a chain of 27 hotels. Eleven of these hotels are owned by Loews Hotels & Co, twelve are owned by joint ventures in which Loews Hotels & Co has non-controlling equity interests and four are managed for unaffiliated owners. Loews Hotels & Co’s earnings are derived from the operation of its owned hotels, its share of earnings in joint venture hotels and hotel management fees earned from both joint venture and managed hotels. Loews Hotels & Co accounted for 2.2%, 4.6% and 5.4% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The hotels are described below.
|
|
Number of
|
|
Name and Location
|
Rooms
|
|
Owned:
|
|
|
Loews Chicago Hotel, Chicago, Illinois
|
400
|
|
Loews Chicago O’Hare Hotel, Chicago, Illinois
|
556
|
|
Loews Coronado Bay Resort,
San Diego, California
|
439
|
|
Loews Hotel 1000, Seattle, Washington
|
120
|
|
Loews Kansas City Hotel, Kansas City, Missouri*
|
800
|
|
Loews Miami Beach Hotel, Miami Beach, Florida
|
790
|
|
Loews Minneapolis Hotel, Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
251
|
|
Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
581
|
|
Loews Regency New York Hotel, New York, New York
|
379
|
|
Loews Vanderbilt Hotel, Nashville, Tennessee
|
340
|
|
Loews Ventana Canyon Resort, Tucson, Arizona
|
398
|
|
Joint Venture:
|
|
|
Hard Rock Hotel, at Universal Orlando, Orlando, Florida
|
650
|
|
Live! by Loews, Arlington, Texas
|
300
|
|
Live! By Loews, St. Louis, Missouri
|
216
|
|
Loews Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, Georgia
|
414
|
|
Loews Hollywood Hotel, Hollywood, California
|
628
|
|
Loews Portofino Bay Hotel, at Universal Orlando,
Orlando, Florida
|
750
|
|
Loews Royal Pacific Resort,
at Universal Orlando, Orlando, Florida
|
1,000
|
|
Loews Sapphire Falls Resort, at Universal Orlando, Orlando, Florida
|
1,000
|
|
Universal’s Aventura Hotel, Orlando, Florida
|
600
|
|
Universal’s Cabana Bay Beach Resort, Orlando, Florida
|
2,200
|
|
Universal’s Endless Summer Resort – Dockside Inn and Suites, Orlando, Florida
|
2,050
|
|
Universal’s Endless Summer Resort – Surfside Inn and Suites, Orlando, Florida
|
750
|
|
Management Contract:
|
|
|
Bisha Hotel and Residences, Toronto, Canada
|
96
|
|
Loews Boston Hotel, Boston, Massachusetts
|
225
|
|
Loews New Orleans Hotel, New Orleans, Louisiana
|
285
|
|
Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel, Santa Monica, California
|
347
|
| * |
Loews Hotels & Co has a controlling majority equity interest in this property.
|
| Note: |
Two owned hotels and many of the joint venture hotels are subject to land leases.
|
Recent Developments and Growth Projects:
|
•
|
In December 2020, Universal’s Endless Summer Resort – Dockside Inn and Suites at Universal Orlando opened with 2,050 guestrooms. As with Loews Hotels & Co’s other properties at Universal Orlando, Loews Hotels & Co operates the hotel and has a joint venture interest in the property;
|
|
•
|
In June 2020, Loews Kansas City Hotel in Kansas City, Missouri, an 800 guestroom hotel with extensive meeting space, opened. Loews Hotels & Co operates the hotel and has a controlling majority equity interest in the property;
|
|
•
|
In February 2020, Live! by Loews in St. Louis, Missouri, a 216 guestroom hotel, opened. Loews Hotels & Co operates the hotel and has a joint venture interest in the property;
|
|
•
|
In 2020, the sale of the Hotel Vogue in Montreal, Canada and an office building in Nashville, Tennessee were completed; and
|
|
•
|
In 2022, Loews Coral Gables Hotel in Coral Gables, Florida, an approximately 242 guestroom hotel in which Loews Hotels & Co will serve as manager and will have a joint venture interest upon completion, is expected to be completed.
|
Altium Packaging is a packaging solutions provider and manufacturer in North America. The business specializes in customized mid- and short-run packaging solutions, serving a diverse customer base in the pharmaceutical, dairy, household chemicals, food/nutraceuticals, industrial/specialty chemicals, water and beverage/juice segments. Altium Packaging develops, manufactures and markets a wide range of extrusion blow-molded and injection molded plastic containers for target markets. In addition, Altium Packaging manufactures commodity and differentiated plastic resins from recycled plastic materials for a variety of end markets. Altium Packaging accounted for 8.1%, 6.2% and 6.2% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Customers
: Altium Packaging sells its products to approximately 9,600 customers throughout North America. Altium Packaging’s largest customers for rigid packaging include a diverse customer base of many nationally recognized branded food, beverage, consumer products and pharmaceutical companies. The recycled resins customer base is primarily domestic with customers in several end markets such as packaging, automotive, industrial and consumer goods.
Properties
: Altium Packaging leases its corporate offices in Atlanta, Georgia and Omaha, Nebraska. It operates 60 manufacturing facilities located throughout the United States and seven facilities located in Canada, of which 59 are leased and eight are owned. In addition, Altium Packaging utilizes fourteen warehouse facilities, of which twelve are leased and two are owned.
Including our subsidiaries, we employed approximately 12,200 persons at December 31, 2020. CNA employed approximately 5,800 persons. Boardwalk Pipelines employed approximately 1,240 persons, approximately 100 of whom were covered under collective bargaining agreements. Loews Hotels & Co employed approximately 1,700 persons, approximately 280 of whom were covered under collective bargaining agreements. Altium Packaging employed approximately 3,300 persons, approximately 300 of whom were covered under collective bargaining agreements. We and our subsidiaries have satisfactory labor relations. Separately, unconsolidated entities employ approximately 2,000 persons at properties managed by Loews Hotels & Co.
We and our subsidiaries understand that hiring the right people is critical to our businesses’ long-term strategic success. Each of us has programs in place to help employees build their knowledge, skills and experience, as well as to guide their career development. Across the Loews enterprise, a cornerstone of our human capital strategy is our commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment, where all people are respected and encouraged to contribute their ideas. We believe that by employing individuals with different backgrounds and experiences, we can better meet the diverse needs of all our stakeholders.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Loews and CNA pivoted to a remote working environment in March of 2020. In the third and fourth quarters Loews and CNA began voluntary re-opening some offices to accommodate employees seeking this flexibility, while carefully monitoring the conditions in those areas and implementing health and safety protocols to protect employees.
Boardwalk Pipelines is part of a critical infrastructure industry whose customers and communities depend upon it to provide safe and reliable service. Boardwalk Pipelines’ employees are essential to ensuring it continues to meet these objectives, and they consider safety in their day-to-day activities to be their primary core value. Boardwalk Pipelines’ emphasis on safety extends to their approach to managing the risk of operational disruptions due to COVID-19, and they have maintained full, continuous operations throughout the pandemic.
The economic effects of COVID-19 have significantly impacted Loews Hotels & Co. In an environment with significantly reduced travel, Loews Hotels & Co had to move aggressively to reduce costs. These cost-reduction measures involved furloughing a substantial portion of its workforce. To help its affected team members, Loews Hotels & Co set up a relief fund and continued to provide medical insurance for several months. When hotels resumed operations, Loews Hotels & Co put into place significant new and enhanced safety and well-being standards and protocols for both team members and guests.
Altium Packaging was deemed an essential business and therefore has continued to operate as a link in the food and household goods supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Altium Packaging is committed to its employees’ safety and has implemented health and safety protocols to help protect its employees.
|
|
First
|
||
|
Became
|
|||
|
Name
|
Position and Offices Held
|
Age
|
Officer
|
|
Marc A. Alpert
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
58
|
2016
|
|
David B. Edelson
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
61
|
2005
|
|
Richard W. Scott
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
|
67
|
2009
|
|
Kenneth I. Siegel
|
Senior Vice President
|
63
|
2009
|
|
Andrew H. Tisch
|
Office of the President, Co-Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee
|
71
|
1985
|
|
James S. Tisch
|
Office of the President, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
68
|
1981
|
|
Jonathan M. Tisch
|
Office of the President and Co-Chairman of the Board
|
67
|
1987
|
Andrew H. Tisch and James S. Tisch are brothers and are cousins of Jonathan M. Tisch. None of our other executive officers or directors is related to any other.
All of our executive officers, except for Marc A. Alpert, have served in their current roles at Loews Corporation for at least the past five years. Prior to assuming his current role at Loews Corporation in July of 2016, Mr. Alpert served as a partner and head of the Public Companies Practice Group at the law firm of Chadbourne & Parke LLP.
Officers are elected annually and hold office until their successors are elected and qualified, and are subject to removal by the Board of Directors.
Our website address is www.loews.com. We make available, free of charge, through the website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Audit Committee charter, Compensation
Committee charter and Nominating and Governance Committee charter are also available on our website. Information on or accessible through our website is not incorporated by reference into this Report. This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other SEC filings made by Loews Corporation are also accessible through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Our business and the businesses of our subsidiaries face many risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could lead to events or circumstances that have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or equity and/or the business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, or equity of one or more of our subsidiaries. We have described below the material risks facing us and our subsidiaries. There may be additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we do not currently perceive to be material that may also impact our business or the businesses of our subsidiaries.
You should carefully consider and evaluate all of the information included in this Report and any subsequent reports we may file with the SEC and the information we make available to the public before investing in any securities issued by us. Our subsidiaries, CNA Financial Corporation and Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, also file reports with the SEC. You are also cautioned to carefully review and consider the information contained in the reports filed by those subsidiaries with the SEC and the information they make available to the public before investing in any of their securities.
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, CNA
The COVID-19 pandemic and measures to mitigate the spread of the virus have resulted in significant risk across CNA’s enterprise, which have had, and may continue to have, material adverse impacts on its business, results of operations and financial condition, the extent of which cannot be determined with any certainty at this time.
The COVID-19 outbreak, and actions seeking to mitigate the spread of the virus, accelerated in both breadth and scope through early 2020, with the World Health Organization declaring it a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The situation has continued to evolve exponentially with implicated exposures increasing given sustained uncertainties across the global marketplace. Both the extensiveness of the pandemic itself, as well as the measures taken to mitigate the virus spread globally, are unprecedented and their effects continue to be pervasive. While vaccination efforts have begun in many geographic locations, the virus continues to spread. Accordingly, it remains the case that nearly a year past the initial identification of the threat, all of the direct and indirect consequences and implications of COVID-19 and measures to mitigate its spread are not yet known and may not emerge for some time.
Risks presented by the ongoing effects of COVID-19 that are known at this time include the following:
Broad economic impact
The economic effect of the pandemic has been broad in nature and has significantly impacted business operations across all industries, including CNA. Depressed economic conditions have led to, and may continue to lead to, decreased insured exposures causing CNA to experience declines in premium volume, especially for lines of business that are sensitive to rates of economic growth and those that are impacted by audit premium adjustments. Significant decreases in premium volume directly and adversely impacts CNA’s underwriting expense ratio. CNA recorded a decrease in its estimated audit premiums during the second quarter of 2020 impacting its net earned premium and if general economic conditions do not improve, CNA’s net written premiums and net earned premiums may be depressed, which may have a material impact on its business, results of operations and financial condition, the extent of which cannot be determined with any certainty at this time.
While CNA’s losses incurred during 2020 related to COVID-19 and measures to mitigate its spread represent CNA’s best estimate of its ultimate insurance losses resulting from events occurring during 2020 due to the pandemic and the consequent economic crisis given the unprecedented nature of this event, a high level of uncertainty exists as to the potential impact on insurance losses from these events or other events that might occur in the future. The scope, duration and magnitude of the direct and indirect effects could continue to evolve, and could materially impact CNA’s ultimate loss estimate, including in lines of business where losses have already been incurred, as well as the potential for impacts in other lines unknown at this time. Continued spread of the virus, as well as new or extended shelter in
place restrictions and full or partial business closures, could cause CNA to experience additional COVID-19 related catastrophe losses in future quarters, which could be material. For further discussion of risks associated with catastrophe losses, see the Risk Factor, “
CNA is vulnerable to material losses from natural and man-made disasters.
”
Financial markets and investments
The COVID-19 pandemic has also significantly impacted financial markets. As investors have embarked on a flight to quality, risk free rates have decreased. In addition, liquidity concerns and overall economic uncertainties drove increased volatility in credit spreads and equity markets. While government actions to date have provided some stability to financial markets, economic prospects in the short term continue to be depressed and CNA remains in a historically low interest rate environment. The continued spread of the virus and the extension of efforts to mitigate the spread in numerous geographic areas will continue to cause substantial uncertainty on the timing and strength of any economic recovery and could continue to impact CNA’s investment portfolio results and valuations, and may result in additional volatility or losses in its investment portfolio, which could be material.
These significant financial market disruptions may have a material impact on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition, the extent of which cannot be determined with any certainty at this time. For further discussion of risks associated with CNA’s investments, see the Risk Factor, “
CNA may incur significant realized and unrealized investment losses and volatility in net investment income arising from changes in the financial markets.
”
Claims and related litigation
CNA has experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, increased claim submissions and litigation related to denial of claims based on policy coverage, in certain lines of business that are implicated by the pandemic and mitigating actions taken by its customers and governmental authorities in response to its spread. These lines include primarily healthcare professional liability, workers’ compensation, commercial property-related business interruption coverage, management liability (directors and officers, employment practices, and professional liability lines) and trade credit. CNA has recorded significant losses in these areas during 2020 and may experience continued losses, which could be material. In addition, CNA’s surety lines may experience increased losses, particularly in construction surety, where there is significant risk that contractors will be adversely and materially impacted by a prolonged decline in economic conditions.
Increased frequency or severity in any or all of the foregoing lines, or others where the exposure has yet to emerge, may have a material impact on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition, the extent of which cannot be determined with any certainty at this time.
CNA has also incurred and may continue to incur substantial expenses related to litigation activity in connection with COVID-related legal claims. These actions primarily relate to denial of claims submitted as a result of the pandemic and the mitigating actions under commercial property policies for business interruption coverage, including lockdowns and closing of certain businesses. The significance of such litigation, both in substance and volume, and the resultant activities CNA has initiated, including external counsel engagement, and the costs related thereto, may have a material impact on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition, the extent of which cannot be determined with any certainty at this time.
Regulatory impact
The regulatory environment is rapidly evolving in direct response to the pandemic and the related mitigating actions. Numerous regulatory authorities to which CNA’s business is subject, have implemented or are contemplating broad and significant regulations restricting and governing insurance company operations during the pandemic crisis. Such actions include, but are not limited to, premium moratoriums, premium refunds and reductions, restrictions on policy cancellations and potential legislation-driven expansion of policy terms. To date, certain state authorities have ordered premium refunds and certain regulatory and legislative bodies have proposed requiring insurers to cover business interruption under policies that were not written to provide for such coverage under the current circumstances. In addition, certain states have directed expansion of workers’ compensation coverage through presumption of compensability of claims for a broad category of workers. This highly fluid and challenging regulatory environment, and the new regulations CNA is now, and may be, subject to may have a material impact on its business, results of operations and financial condition, the extent of which cannot be determined with any certainty at this time. For further
discussion of risks associated with CNA’s regulatory environment, see the Risk Factor, “
CNA is subject to extensive existing state, local, federal and foreign governmental regulations that restrict its ability to do business and generate revenues; additional regulation or significant modification to existing regulations or failure to comply with regulatory requirements may have a materially adverse effect on CNA’s business, operations and financial condition.
”
If CNA determines that its recorded insurance reserves are insufficient to cover its estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claim and claim adjustment expenses, CNA may need to increase its insurance reserves which would result in a charge to CNA’s earnings.
CNA maintains insurance reserves to cover its estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claim and claim adjustment expenses, including the estimated cost of the claims adjudication process, for reported and unreported claims. Insurance reserves are not an exact calculation of liability but instead are complex management estimates developed utilizing a variety of actuarial reserve estimation techniques as of a given reporting date. The reserve estimation process involves a high degree of judgment and variability and is subject to a number of factors which are highly uncertain. These variables can be affected by both changes in internal processes and external events. Key variables include frequency of claims, claim severity, mortality, morbidity, discount rates, inflation, claim handling policies and procedures, case reserving approach, underwriting and pricing policies, changes in the legal and regulatory environment and the lag time between the occurrence of an insured event and the time of its ultimate settlement. Mortality is the relative incidence of death. Morbidity is the frequency and severity of injury, illness, sickness and diseases contracted.
There is generally a higher degree of variability in estimating required reserves for long-tail coverages, such as workers’ compensation, general liability and professional liability, as they require a relatively longer period of time for claims to be reported and settled. The impact of changes in inflation and medical costs are also more pronounced for long-tail coverages due to the longer settlement period. Certain risks and uncertainties associated with CNA’s insurance reserves are outlined in the Insurance Reserves and Critical Accounting Estimates sections of MD&A in Item 7.
CNA is subject to the uncertain effects of emerging or potential claims and coverage issues that arise as industry practices and legal, judicial, social, economic and other environmental conditions change. These issues have had, and may continue to have, a negative effect on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition by either extending coverage beyond the original underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims, resulting in further increases in CNA’s reserves. The effects of unforeseen emerging claim and coverage issues are extremely difficult to predict and may be material.
In light of the many uncertainties associated with establishing the estimates and making the judgments necessary to establish reserve levels, CNA continually reviews and changes its reserve estimates in a regular and ongoing process as experience develops from the actual reporting and settlement of claims and as the legal, regulatory and economic environment evolves. If CNA’s recorded reserves are insufficient for any reason, the required increase in reserves would be recorded as a charge against its earnings in the period in which reserves are determined to be insufficient. These charges could be substantial.
CNA’s actual experience could vary from the key assumptions used to determine active life reserves for long term care policies.
CNA’s active life reserves for long term care policies are based on CNA’s best estimate assumptions as of September 30, 2020, due to a reserve unlocking at that date. Key assumptions include morbidity, persistency (the percentage of policies remaining in force), discount rate and future premium rate increases.
Estimating future experience for long term care policies is highly uncertain, because the adequacy of the reserves is contingent upon actual experience and CNA’s future expectations related to these key assumptions. If actual or expected future experience differs from these assumptions, the reserves may not be adequate, requiring CNA to add reserves. The required increase in reserves would be recorded as a charge against its earnings in the period in which reserves are determined to be insufficient. These charges could be substantial. See the Life & Group Policyholder Reserves portion of the Insurance Reserves section of MD&A in Item 7 for more information.
Morbidity and persistency experience, inclusive of mortality, can be volatile and may be negatively affected by many factors including, but not limited to, policyholder behavior, judicial decisions regarding policy terms, socioeconomic factors, cost of care inflation, changes in health trends and advances in medical care.
A prolonged period during which investment returns remain at levels lower than those anticipated in CNA’s reserving would result in shortfalls in investment income on assets supporting CNA’s obligations under long term care policies, which may require changes to its reserves. This risk is more significant for CNA’s long term care products because the long potential duration of the policy obligations exceeds the duration of the supporting investment assets. Further, changes to the Internal Revenue Code may also affect the rate at which CNA discounts its reserves. In addition, CNA may not receive regulatory approval for the level of premium rate increases it requests. Any adverse deviation between the level of future premium rate increases approved and the level included in CNA’s reserving assumptions may require an increase to its reserves.
CNA is vulnerable to material losses from natural and man-made disasters.
Catastrophe losses are an inevitable part of CNA’s business. Various events can cause catastrophe losses. These events can be natural or man-made, and may include hurricanes, windstorms, earthquakes, hail, severe winter weather, fires, floods, riots, strikes, civil unrest, cyber attacks, pandemics and acts of terrorism. The frequency and severity of these catastrophe events are inherently unpredictable. In addition, longer-term natural catastrophe trends may be changing and new types of catastrophe losses may be developing due to climate change, a phenomenon that has been associated with extreme weather events linked to rising temperatures, and includes effects on global weather patterns, greenhouse gases, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain, hail and snow.
The extent of CNA’s losses from catastrophes is a function of the total amount of its insured exposures in the affected areas, the frequency and severity of the events themselves, the level of reinsurance coverage, reinsurance reinstatement premiums and state residual market assessments, if any. It can take a long time for the ultimate cost of any catastrophe losses to CNA to be finally determined, as a multitude of factors contribute to such costs, including evaluation of general liability and pollution exposures, infrastructure disruption, business interruption and reinsurance collectibility. Further, significant catastrophic events or a series of catastrophic events have the potential to impose financial stress on the reinsurance industry, which could impact CNA’s ability to collect amounts owed to CNA by reinsurers, thereby resulting in higher net incurred losses.
Reinsurance coverage for terrorism events is provided only in limited circumstances, especially in regard to “unconventional” terrorism acts, such as nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks. CNA’s principal reinsurance protection against these large-scale terrorist attacks is the coverage currently provided through TRIPRA through December 31, 2027. However, such coverage is subject to a mandatory deductible and other limitations. It is also possible that future legislation could change or eliminate the program, which could adversely affect CNA’s business by increasing its exposure to terrorism losses, or by lowering its business volume through efforts to avoid that exposure. For a further discussion of TRIPRA, see Part II, Item 7, MD&A - Catastrophes and Related Reinsurance.
As a result of the items discussed above, catastrophe losses are particularly difficult to estimate, could cause CNA to exhaust its available reinsurance limits and could adversely affect the cost and availability of reinsurance. Accordingly, catastrophic events could have a material adverse effect on CNA’s business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
CNA has exposure related to A&EP claims, which could result in material losses.
CNA’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries have exposures related to A&EP claims. CNA’s experience has been that establishing claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for casualty coverages relating to A&EP claims is subject to uncertainties that are greater than those presented by other claims. Additionally, traditional actuarial methods and techniques employed to estimate the ultimate cost of claims for more traditional property and casualty exposures are less precise in estimating claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for A&EP. As a result, estimating the ultimate cost of both reported and unreported A&EP claims is subject to a higher degree of variability.
On August 31, 2010, CNA completed a retroactive reinsurance transaction under which substantially all of its legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., subject to an aggregate limit of $4.0 billion (“loss portfolio transfer” or “LPT”). The cumulative amount ceded under the loss portfolio transfer as of December 31, 2020 is $3.3 billion. If the other parties to the loss portfolio transfer do not fully perform their obligations, net losses incurred on A&EP claims covered by the loss portfolio transfer exceed the aggregate limit of $4.0 billion or CNA determines it has exposures to A&EP claims not covered by the loss portfolio transfer, CNA may need to increase its recorded net reserves which would result in a charge against earnings. These charges could be substantial. Additionally, if the A&EP claims exceed the limit of the loss portfolio transfer, CNA will need to assess whether to purchase additional limit or to reassume claim handling responsibility for A&EP claims from an affiliate of NICO. Any additional reinsurance premium or future claim handling costs would also reduce CNA’s earnings.
CNA is exposed to, and may face adverse developments related to, mass tort claims that could arise from its insureds’ sale or use of potentially harmful products or substances, changes to the social and legal environment, issues related to altered interpretation of coverage and other new and emerging claim theories.
CNA faces potential exposure to various types of new and emerging mass tort claims including, those related to exposure to potentially harmful products or substances such as glyphosate, lead paint and opioids; claims arising from changes that expand the right to sue, remove limitations on recovery, extend the statutes of limitations or otherwise repeal or weaken tort reforms, such as those related to abuse reviver statutes, including New York reviver statutes; and claims related to new and emerging theories of liability, such as those related to global warming and climate change. Evolving judicial interpretations and new legislation regarding the application of various tort theories and defenses, including application of various theories of joint and several liability, as well as the application of insurance coverage to these claims, give rise to new claimant activity. Emerging mass tort claim activity, including activity based on such changing judicial interpretations and recent and proposed legislation could have a material adverse effect on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
CNA may not be able to obtain sufficient reinsurance at a cost or on terms and conditions it deems acceptable, which could result in increased exposure to risk or a decrease in CNA’s underwriting commitments.
A primary reason CNA purchases reinsurance is to manage its exposure to risk. Under CNA’s ceded reinsurance arrangements, another insurer assumes a specified portion of CNA’s exposure in exchange for a specified portion of policy premiums. Market conditions determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance protection CNA purchases, which affects the level of its business and profitability, as well as the level and types of risk CNA retains. If CNA is unable to obtain sufficient reinsurance at a cost or on terms and conditions it deems acceptable, CNA may have increased exposure to risk, which could be material. Alternatively, CNA may be unwilling to bear the increased risk, which would reduce the level of its underwriting commitments.
CNA faces intense competition in its industry; it may be adversely affected by the cyclical nature of the property and casualty business and the evolving landscape of its distribution network.
All aspects of the insurance industry are highly competitive and CNA must continuously allocate resources to refine and improve its insurance products and services to remain competitive. CNA competes with a large number of stock and mutual insurance companies and other entities, some of which may be larger or have greater financial or other resources than CNA does, for both distributors and customers. This includes agents, brokers and managing general underwriters who may increasingly compete with CNA to the extent that they continue to have direct access to providers of capital seeking exposure to insurance risk. Insurers compete on the basis of many factors, including products, price, services, ratings and financial strength. The competitor landscape has evolved substantially in recent years, with significant consolidation and new market entrants, such as insuretech firms, resulting in increased pressures on CNA’s ability to remain competitive, particularly in obtaining pricing that is both attractive to CNA’s customer base and risk appropriate to CNA.
In addition, the property and casualty market is cyclical and has experienced periods characterized by relatively high levels of price competition, resulting in less restrictive underwriting standards and relatively low premium rates, followed by periods of relatively lower levels of competition, more selective underwriting standards and relatively high premium rates. During periods in which price competition is high, CNA may lose business to competitors offering competitive insurance products at lower prices. As a result, CNA’s premium levels and expense ratio could be materially adversely impacted.
CNA markets its insurance products worldwide primarily through independent insurance agents, insurance brokers and managing general underwriters who also promote and distribute the products of CNA’s competitors. Any change in CNA’s relationships with its distribution network agents, brokers or managing general underwriters, including as a result of consolidation and their increased promotion and distribution of CNA’s competitors’ products, could adversely affect CNA’s ability to sell its products. As a result, CNA’s business volume and results of operations could be materially adversely impacted.
CNA may be adversely affected by technological changes or disruptions in the insurance marketplace.
Technological changes in the way insurance transactions are completed in the marketplace, and CNA’s ability to react effectively to such change, may present significant competitive risks. For example, more insurers are utilizing “big data” analytics to make underwriting and other decisions that impact product design and pricing. If such utilization is more effective than how CNA uses similar data and information, CNA will be at a competitive disadvantage. There can be no assurance that CNA will continue to compete effectively with its industry peers due to technological changes; accordingly this may have a material adverse effect on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, agents and brokers, technology companies or other third parties may create alternate distribution channels for commercial business that may adversely impact product differentiation and pricing. For example, they may create a digitally enabled distribution channel that may adversely impact CNA’s competitive position. CNA’s efforts or the efforts of agents and brokers with respect to new products or alternate distribution channels, as well as changes in the way agents and brokers utilize greater levels of data and technology, could adversely impact CNA’s business relationships with independent agents and brokers who currently market its products, resulting in a lower volume and/or profitability of business generated from these sources.
CNA may incur significant realized and unrealized investment losses and volatility in net investment income arising from changes in the financial markets.
CNA’s investment portfolio is exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, credit spread, issuer default, equity prices and foreign currency, which are unpredictable. Financial markets are highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions, monetary policies, tax policies, domestic and international geopolitical issues and many other factors. Changes in financial markets including fluctuations in interest rates, credit, equity prices and foreign currency prices, and many other factors beyond CNA’s control can adversely affect the value of its investments, the realization of investment income and the rate at which it discounts certain liabilities. CNA’s investment portfolio is also subject to increased valuation uncertainties when investment markets are illiquid. The valuation of investments is more subjective when markets are illiquid, thereby increasing the risk that the estimated fair value (i.e., the carrying amount) of the portion of CNA’s investment portfolio that is carried at fair value in the financial statements is not reflective of prices at which actual transactions could occur.
CNA has significant holdings in fixed maturity investments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. A decline in interest rates may reduce the returns earned on new fixed maturity investments, thereby reducing CNA’s net investment income, while an increase in interest rates may reduce the value of its existing fixed maturity investments, which could reduce CNA’s net unrealized gains included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”). The value of CNA’s fixed maturity investments is also subject to risk that certain investments may default or become impaired due to deterioration in the financial condition of issuers of the investments CNA holds or in the underlying collateral of the security.
In addition, CNA invests a portion of its assets in limited partnerships and common stock which are subject to greater market volatility than its fixed maturity investments. Limited partnership investments generally provide a lower level of liquidity than fixed maturity or equity investments, which may also limit CNA’s ability to withdraw funds from these investments. The timing and amount of income or losses on such investments is inherently variable and can contribute to volatility in reported earnings.
Further, CNA holds a portfolio of commercial mortgage loans. CNA is subject to risk related to the recoverability of loan balances, which is influenced by declines in the estimated cash flows from underlying property leases, fair value of collateral, refinancing risk and the creditworthiness of tenants of the underlying properties, where lease payments directly service the loan. Any changes in actual or expected collections would result in a charge to earnings.
As a result of these factors, CNA may not earn an adequate return on its investments, may be required to write down the value of its investments and may incur losses on the disposition of its investments, all of which could materially adversely affect CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
CNA uses analytical models to assist its decision making in key areas such as pricing, reserving and capital modeling and may be adversely affected if actual results differ materially from the model outputs and related analyses.
CNA uses various modeling techniques and data analytics (e.g., scenarios, predictive, stochastic and/or forecasting) to analyze and estimate exposures, loss trends and other risks associated with its assets and liabilities. This includes both proprietary and third party modeled outputs and related analyses to assist CNA in decision-making related to underwriting, pricing, capital allocation, reserving, investing, reinsurance and catastrophe risk, among other things. CNA incorporates numerous assumptions and forecasts about the future level and variability of policyholder behavior, loss frequency and severity, interest rates, equity markets, inflation, capital requirements, and currency exchange rates, among others. The modeled outputs and related analyses from both proprietary models and third parties are subject to various assumptions, uncertainties, model design errors and the inherent limitations of any statistical analysis. Further, climate change may make modeled outcomes less certain or produce new, non-modeled risks.
In addition, the effectiveness of any model can be degraded by operational risks, including the improper use of the model, input errors, data errors and human error. As a result, actual results may differ materially from CNA’s modeled results. The profitability and financial condition of CNA substantially depends on the extent to which its actual experience is consistent with the assumptions CNA uses in its models and ultimate model outputs. If, based upon these models or other factors, CNA misprices its products or fails to appropriately estimate the risks it is exposed to, its business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Inability to detect and prevent significant employee or third party service provider misconduct, inadvertent errors and omissions, or exposure relating to functions performed on CNA’s behalf could result in a material adverse effect on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
CNA may incur losses which arise from employees or third party service providers engaging in intentional, negligent or inadvertent misconduct, fraud, errors and omissions, failure to comply with internal guidelines, including with respect to underwriting authority, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements. CNA’s or its third party service providers’ controls may not be able to detect all possible circumstances of such non-compliant activity and the internal structures in place to prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. Any losses relating to such non-compliant activity could adversely affect CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
Portions of CNA’s insurance business is underwritten and serviced by third parties. With respect to underwriting, CNA’s contractual arrangements with third parties will typically grant them limited rights to write new and renewal policies, subject to contractual restrictions and obligations, including requiring them to underwrite within the terms of CNA’s licenses. Should these third parties issue policies that exceed these contractual restrictions, CNA could be deemed liable for such policies and subject to regulatory fines and penalties for any breach of licensing requirements. It is possible that in such circumstance CNA might not be fully indemnified for such third parties’ contractual breaches.
Additionally, CNA relies on certain third-party claims administrators, including the administrators of its long term care claims, to perform significant claim administration and claim adjudication functions. Any failure by such administrator to properly perform service functions may result in losses as a result of over-payment of claims, legal claims against CNA and adverse regulatory enforcement exposure.
CNA has also licensed certain systems from third parties. CNA cannot be certain that it will have access to these systems or that its information technology or application systems will continue to operate as intended.
These risks could adversely impact CNA’s reputation and client relationships and have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.
CNA is subject to capital adequacy requirements and, if it is unable to maintain or raise sufficient capital to meet these requirements, regulatory agencies may restrict or prohibit CNA from operating its business.
Insurance companies such as CNA are subject to capital adequacy standards set by regulators to help identify companies that merit further regulatory attention. In the U.S., these standards apply specified risk factors to various asset, premium and reserve components of CNA’s legal entity statutory basis of accounting financial statements. Current rules, including those promulgated by insurance regulators and specialized markets such as Lloyd’s, require companies to maintain statutory capital and surplus at a specified minimum level determined using the applicable jurisdiction’s regulatory capital adequacy formula. If CNA does not meet these minimum requirements, CNA may be restricted or prohibited from operating its business in the applicable jurisdictions and specialized markets. If CNA is required to record a material charge against earnings in connection with a change in estimated insurance reserves or the occurrence of a catastrophic event or if it incurs significant losses related to its investment portfolio, which severely deteriorates its capital position, CNA may violate these minimum capital adequacy requirements unless it is able to raise sufficient additional capital. CNA may be limited in its ability to raise significant amounts of capital on favorable terms or at all.
The IAIS has adopted a common framework for the supervision of internationally active insurance groups and continues to develop a group basis Insurance Capital Standard (“ICS”). The NAIC is also developing a group capital standard that is intended to be comparable to the ICS. The development and adoption of these capital standards could increase CNA’s prescribed capital requirement, the level at which regulatory scrutiny intensifies, as well as significantly increase its cost of regulatory compliance.
CNA’s insurance subsidiaries, upon whom CNA depends for dividends in order to fund its corporate obligations, are limited by insurance regulators in their ability to pay dividends.
CNA is a holding company and is dependent upon dividends, loans and other sources of cash from its subsidiaries in order to meet its obligations. Ordinary dividend payments or dividends that do not require prior approval by the insurance subsidiaries’ domiciliary insurance regulator are generally limited to amounts determined by formulas that vary by jurisdiction. If CNA is restricted from paying or receiving intercompany dividends, by regulatory rule or otherwise, CNA may not be able to fund its corporate obligations and debt service requirements or pay stockholder dividends from available cash. As a result, CNA would need to pursue other sources of capital which may be more expensive or may not be available at all.
Rating agencies may downgrade their ratings of CNA, adversely affecting its ability to write insurance at competitive rates or at all and increasing its cost of capital.
Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. CNA’s insurance company subsidiaries, as well as CNA’s public debt, are rated by rating agencies, including, A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) and Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”). Ratings reflect the rating agency’s opinions of an insurance company’s or insurance holding company’s financial strength, capital adequacy, enterprise risk management practices, operating performance, strategic position and ability to meet its obligations to policyholders and debt holders.
The rating agencies may take action to lower CNA’s ratings in the future as a result of any significant financial loss or changes in the methodology or criteria applied by the rating agencies. The severity of the impact on CNA’s business is dependent on the level of downgrade and, for certain products, which rating agency takes the rating action. Among
the adverse effects in the event of such downgrades would be the inability to obtain a material volume of business from certain major insurance brokers, the inability to sell a material volume of CNA’s insurance products to certain markets and the required collateralization of certain future payment obligations or reserves. Further, if one or more of CNA’s corporate debt ratings were downgraded, CNA may find it more difficult to access the capital markets and may incur higher borrowing costs.
In addition, it is possible that a significant lowering of our corporate debt ratings by certain of the rating agencies could result in an adverse effect on CNA’s ratings, independent of any change in CNA’s circumstances. For further discussion of CNA’s ratings, see the Subsidiaries portion of the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of MD&A in Item 7.
CNA is subject to extensive existing state, local, federal and foreign governmental regulations that restrict its ability to do business and generate revenues; additional regulation or significant modification to existing regulations or failure to comply with regulatory requirements may have a materially adverse effect on CNA’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
The insurance industry is subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation and supervision. Most insurance regulations are designed to protect the interests of CNA’s policyholders and third-party claimants rather than its investors. Each jurisdiction in which CNA does business has established supervisory agencies that regulate the manner in which CNA conducts its business. Any changes in regulation could impose significant burdens on CNA. In addition, the Lloyd’s marketplace sets rules under which its members, including CNA’s Hardy syndicate, operate.
These rules and regulations relate to, among other things, the standards of solvency (including risk-based capital measures), government-supported backstops for certain catastrophic events (including terrorism), investment restrictions, accounting and reporting methodology, establishment of reserves and potential assessments of funds to settle covered claims against impaired, insolvent or failed private or quasi-governmental insurers.
Regulatory powers also extend to premium rate regulations which require that rates not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. State jurisdictions ensure compliance with such regulations through market conduct exams, which may result in losses to the extent non-compliance is ascertained, either as a result of failure to document transactions properly or failure to comply with internal guidelines, or otherwise. CNA may also be required by the jurisdictions in which it does business to provide coverage to persons who would not otherwise be considered eligible or restrict CNA from withdrawing from unprofitable lines of business or unprofitable market areas. Each jurisdiction dictates the types of insurance and the level of coverage that must be provided to such involuntary risks. CNA’s share of these involuntary risks is mandatory and generally a function of its respective share of the voluntary market by line of insurance in each jurisdiction.
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Boardwalk Pipelines
Boardwalk Pipelines’ natural gas transportation and storage operations are subject to extensive regulation by the FERC, including rules and regulations related to the rates it can charge for its services and its ability to construct or abandon facilities. Boardwalk Pipelines may not be able to recover the full cost of operating its pipelines, including earning a reasonable return.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ natural gas transportation and storage
operations are subject to extensive regulation by the FERC, including the types, rates and terms of services Boardwalk Pipelines may offer to its customers, construction of new facilities, creation, modification or abandonment of services or facilities and recordkeeping and relationships with affiliated companies. An adverse FERC action in any of these areas could affect Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to compete for business, construct new facilities, offer new services or recover the full cost of operating its pipelines. This regulatory oversight can result in longer lead times to develop and complete any future project than competitors that are not subject to the FERC’s regulations. The FERC can also deny Boardwalk Pipelines the right to abandon certain facilities from service.
The FERC also regulates the rates Boardwalk Pipelines can charge for its natural gas transportation and storage operations. For cost-based services, the FERC establishes both the maximum and minimum rates Boardwalk Pipelines can charge. The basic elements that the FERC considers are the costs of providing service, the volumes of gas being transported, the rate design, the allocation of costs between services, the capital structure and the rate of return a pipeline is permitted to earn. Boardwalk Pipelines may not be able to recover its costs, including certain costs associated with pipeline integrity, through existing or future rates.
The FERC and/or Boardwalk Pipelines’ customers could challenge the maximum applicable rates that any of its regulated pipelines are allowed to charge in accordance with Section 5 of the NGA. Potential legislation that would amend Section 5 of the NGA to add refund provisions could increase the likelihood of such a challenge. If such a challenge is successful for any of Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines, the revenues associated with transportation and storage services the pipeline provides pursuant to cost-of-service rates could materially decrease in the future, which would adversely affect the revenues on that pipeline going forward.
Legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to pipeline safety that require the use of new or more prescriptive compliance activities, substantial changes to existing integrity management programs or withdrawal of regulatory waivers could subject Boardwalk Pipelines to increased capital and operating costs and operational delays.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ interstate pipelines are subject to regulation by PHMSA, which is part of the DOT. PHMSA regulates the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, and maintenance of existing interstate natural gas and NGLs pipeline facilities. PHMSA regulation currently requires pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs, including frequent inspections, correction of certain identified anomalies and other measures to promote pipeline safety in HCAs, MCAs, Class 3 and Class 4 areas, as well as in areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage and commercially navigable waterways. States have jurisdiction over certain of Boardwalk Pipelines’ intrastate pipelines and have adopted regulations similar to existing PHMSA regulations. State regulations may impose more stringent requirements than found under federal law that affect Boardwalk Pipelines’ intrastate operations. Compliance with these rules over time generally has resulted in an overall increase in maintenance costs. The imposition of new or more stringent pipeline safety rules applicable to natural gas or NGL pipelines, or any issuance or reinterpretation of guidance from PHMSA or any state agencies with respect thereto could cause Boardwalk Pipelines to install new or modified safety controls, pursue additional capital projects or conduct maintenance programs on an accelerated basis, any or all of which tasks could result in Boardwalk Pipelines incurring increased capital and operating costs, experiencing operational delays and suffering potential adverse impacts to its operations or ability to reliably serve its customers. Requirements that are imposed under the 2011 Act or the more recent 2016 Act may also increase Boardwalk Pipelines’ capital and operating costs or impact the operation of its pipelines. In the Fiscal Year 2021 Omnibus Appropriations Bill, Congress reauthorized PHMSA through fiscal year 2023 and directed the agency to move forward with several regulatory actions. Any new pipeline safety legislation or implementing regulations could impose more stringent or costly compliance obligations on Boardwalk Pipelines and could require it to pursue additional capital projects or conduct integrity or maintenance programs on an accelerated basis, any or all of which tasks could result in Boardwalk Pipelines incurring increased operating costs that could have a material adverse effect on its costs of providing transportation services.
Boardwalk Pipelines has entered into certain firm transportation contracts with shippers on certain of its expansion projects that utilize the design capacity of certain of its pipeline assets, based upon the authority Boardwalk Pipelines received from PHMSA to operate those pipelines at higher than normal operating pressures of up to 0.80 of the pipeline’s SMYS under issued permits with specific conditions. PHMSA retains discretion to withdraw or modify this authority. If PHMSA were to withdraw or materially modify such authority, it could affect Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to transport all of its contracted quantities of natural gas on these pipeline assets and it could incur significant additional costs to reinstate this authority or to develop alternate ways to meet its contractual obligations.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ actual construction and development costs could exceed its forecasts, its anticipated cash flow from construction and development projects will not be immediate and its construction and development projects may not be completed on time or at all.
Boardwalk Pipelines has been and is currently engaged in several construction projects involving its existing assets and the construction of new facilities for which it has expended or will expend significant capital. Boardwalk Pipelines expects to continue to engage in the construction of additional growth projects and modifications of its system. When Boardwalk Pipelines builds a new pipeline or expands or modifies an existing facility, the design, construction and
development occurs over an extended period of time, and it will not receive any revenue or cash flow from that project until after it is placed into commercial service. On Boardwalk Pipelines’ interstate pipelines there are several years between when the project is announced and when customers begin using the new facilities. During this period, Boardwalk Pipelines spends capital and incurs costs without receiving any of the financial benefits associated with the projects. The construction of new assets involves regulatory (federal, state and local), landowner opposition, environmental, activist, legal, political, materials and labor costs, as well as operational and other risks that are difficult to predict and some are beyond Boardwalk Pipelines’ control. A project may not be completed on time or at all due to a variety of factors, may be impacted by significant cost overruns or may be materially changed prior to completion as a result of developments or circumstances that Boardwalk Pipelines is not aware of when it commits to the project. Any of these events could result in material unexpected costs or have a material adverse effect on Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its growth projects.
Legislative and regulatory initiatives related to climate change make Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations as well as the operations of its fossil fuel producer customers subject to a series of regulatory, political, litigation and financial risks associated with the production and processing of fossil fuels and emission of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”).
The threat of climate change continues to attract considerable attention in the U.S. and in foreign countries. Numerous proposals have been made and could continue to be made at the international, national, regional and state levels of government to monitor and limit existing emissions of GHGs as well as to restrict or eliminate such future emissions, which makes Boardwalk Pipelines operations as well as the operations of its fossil fuel producer customers subject to a series of regulatory, political, litigation and financial risks associated with the production and processing of fossil fuels and emission of GHGs.
In the U.S., no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal level. With the U.S. Supreme Court finding that GHG emissions constitute a pollutant under the CAA, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has adopted several rules that, among other things, establish construction and operating permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources, require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain natural gas system sources in the U.S., implement New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) directing the reduction of methane from certain new, modified or reconstructed facilities in the natural gas sector, and together with the DOT, implement GHG emissions limits on vehicles manufactured for operation in the U.S. In recent years, there has been considerable uncertainty surrounding regulation of methane emissions, as the EPA under the Obama Administration published final regulations under the CAA establishing new performance standards for methane in 2016, but since that time the EPA under the Trump Administration has undertaken several measures, including publishing in September of 2020 final rule policy and technical amendments to the NSPS, for stationary sources of air emissions. The policy amendments, effective September 14, 2020, notably removed the transmission and storage sector from the regulated source category and rescinded methane and volatile organic compound (“VOC”) requirements for the remaining sources that were established by former President Obama’s Administration; whereas the technical amendments, effective November 16, 2020, included changes to fugitive emissions monitoring and repair schedules for gathering and boosting compressor stations and low-production wells, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Various states and industry and environmental groups are separately challenging both the original 2016 standards and the EPA's September 2020 final rules, and on January 20, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order, that directed the EPA to reconsider the technical amendments and issue a proposed rule suspending, revising or rescinding those amendments by no later than September of 2021. A reconsideration of the September 2020 policy amendments is expected to follow. The January 20, 2021, executive order also directed the establishment of new methane and VOC standards applicable to existing oil and gas operations, including the production, transmission, processing and storage segments. Various states and groups of states have adopted or are considering adopting legislation, regulations or other regulatory initiatives that are focused on such areas as GHG cap and trade programs, carbon taxes, reporting and tracking programs and restriction of emissions. At the international level, the non-binding Paris Agreement requests that nations limit their GHG emissions through individually-determined reduction goals every five years after 2020. Although the U.S. had withdrawn from the Paris Agreement, President Biden has issued executive orders recommitting the U.S. to the Paris Agreement and calling for the federal government to begin formulating the U.S.’ nationally determined emissions reduction goal under the agreement. With the U.S. recommitting to the Paris Agreement, additional executive orders may be issued or federal legislation or regulatory initiatives may be adopted to achieve the Paris Agreement’s goals.
Governmental, scientific and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in increasing political risks in the U.S. On January 27, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order that commits to substantial action on climate change, calling for, among other things, suspending the issuance of new leases for oil and gas development on federal lands, pending completion of a review of leasing and permitting practices and expanding on the Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior's January 20, 2020 order, effective immediately, that suspends new oil and gas leases and drilling permits on federal lands and waters for a period of 60 days. The executive order also called for the increased use of zero-emissions vehicles by the federal government, the elimination of subsidies provided to the fossil fuel industry, and an increased emphasis on climate-related risks across government agencies and economic sectors. Legal challenges to these suspensions are expected, with at least one industry group filing a lawsuit on January 27, 2021, in Wyoming federal district court and seeking to have the moratorium declared invalid. The new presidential administration could also pursue the imposition of more restrictive requirements for the establishment of pipeline infrastructure or the permitting of LNG export facilities, as well as more restrictive GHG emissions limitations for oil and gas facilities. Litigation risks are also increasing, as a number of cities and other local governments have sought to bring suit against fossil fuel producer companies in state or federal court, alleging that such companies created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to global warming effects, such as rising sea levels, and are responsible for roadway and infrastructure damages as a result, or alleging that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change for some time but defrauded their investors or customers by failing to adequately disclose those impacts.
There are also increasing financial risks for fossil fuel energy companies as investors in fossil fuel energy companies become increasingly concerned about the potential effects of climate change and may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-energy related sectors. Institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil fuel energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel energy companies. Additionally, there is the possibility that financial institutions will be required to adopt policies that limit funding for fossil fuel energy companies. Recently, the Federal Reserve announced that it has joined the Network for Greening the Financial System, a consortium of financial regulators focused on addressing climate-related risks in the financial sector. This could make it more difficult for Boardwalk Pipelines to secure funding for exploration and production or midstream energy business activities.
The adoption and implementation of new or more stringent international, federal or state legislation, regulations or other regulatory initiatives that impose more stringent standards for GHG emissions from the oil and gas sector or otherwise restrict the areas in which this sector may produce fossil fuels or generate GHG emissions could result in increased costs of compliance or costs of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for fossil fuels, which could reduce demand for Boardwalk Pipelines’ transportation and storage services. Political, litigation and financial risks may result in its fossil fuel producer customers restricting or canceling production activities, incurring liability for infrastructure damages as a result of climatic changes or impairing their ability to continue to operate in an economic manner, which also could reduce demand for Boardwalk Pipelines’ services. Moreover, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels) could reduce demand for hydrocarbons, and for Boardwalk Pipelines’ services. Finally, increasing concentrations of GHG in the earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods, rising sea levels and other climatic events.
The outbreak of COVID-19 and the measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 could materially adversely affect Boardwalk Pipelines’ business, financial condition and results of operations and those of its customers, suppliers and other business partners.
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has materially negatively impacted worldwide economic and commercial activity and financial markets and has impacted global demand for oil and petrochemical products. COVID-19 has also resulted in significant business and operational disruptions, including business closures, supply chain disruptions, travel restrictions, stay-at-home orders and limitations on the availability of workforces. If significant portions of Boardwalk Pipelines’ workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, facility closures or other restrictions in connection with COVID-19, its business could be materially adversely affected. Boardwalk Pipelines may also be unable to perform fully on its contracts, and its costs may increase as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. These cost increases may not be fully recoverable. It is possible that the continued spread of COVID-19 could also further cause disruption in Boardwalk Pipelines’ customers’ business; cause delay, or limit the ability of its customers to perform, including in making timely payments to it; and cause other
unpredictable events. The impact of COVID-19 has impacted capital markets, which may impact Boardwalk Pipelines’ customers’ financial position, and recoverability of its receivables from its customers may be at risk. The full impact of COVID-19 is unknown and continues to evolve. The extent to which COVID-19 negatively impacts Boardwalk Pipelines’ business and operations will depend on the severity, location and duration of the effects and spread of COVID-19, the continued actions undertaken by national, regional and local governments and health officials to contain the virus or treat its effects, and how quickly and to what extent economic conditions improve and normal business and operating conditions resume. It might also have the effect of increasing several of the other risk factors contained herein.
Changes in energy prices, including natural gas, oil and NGLs, impact the supply of and demand for those commodities, which impact Boardwalk Pipelines’ business.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ customers, especially producers and certain plant operators, are directly impacted by changes in commodity prices. The prices of natural gas, oil and NGLs fluctuate in response to changes in both domestic and worldwide supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors, including for natural gas the realization of potential LNG exports and demand growth within the power generation market. The recent volatility in the pricing levels of natural gas, oil and NGLs has adversely affected the businesses of certain of Boardwalk Pipelines’ producer customers and could result in defaults or the non-renewal of Boardwalk Pipelines’ contracted capacity when existing contracts expire. The current erosion in commodity prices could affect the operations of certain of Boardwalk Pipelines’ industrial customers, including the temporary closure or reduction of plant operations, resulting in decreased deliveries to those customers. Future increases in the price of natural gas and NGLs could make alternative energy and feedstock sources more competitive and decrease demand for natural gas and NGLs. A reduced level of demand for natural gas and NGLs could diminish the utilization of capacity on Boardwalk Pipelines’ systems and reduce the demand of its services.
The price differentials between natural gas supplies and market demand for natural gas have reduced the transportation rates that Boardwalk Pipelines can charge on certain portions of its pipeline systems.
Each year a portion of Boardwalk Pipelines firm natural gas transportation contracts expire and need to be replaced or renewed. Over the past several years, as a result of market conditions, Boardwalk Pipelines has renewed some expiring contracts at lower rates or for shorter terms than in the past. The transportation rates Boardwalk Pipelines is able to charge customers are heavily influenced by market trends (both short and longer term), including the available supply, geographical location of natural gas production, the competition between producing basins, competition with other pipelines for supply and markets, the demand for gas by end-users such as power plants, petrochemical facilities and LNG export facilities and the price differentials between the gas supplies and the market demand for the gas (basis differentials). Market conditions have resulted in a sustained narrowing of basis differentials on certain portions of Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipeline system, which has reduced transportation rates that can be charged in the affected areas and adversely affected the contract terms Boardwalk Pipelines can secure from its customers for available transportation capacity and for contracts being renewed or replaced. Boardwalk Pipelines expects these market conditions to continue.
Boardwalk Pipelines is exposed to credit risk relating to default or bankruptcy by its customers.
Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from the default by a customer of its contractual obligations or the customer filing bankruptcy. Boardwalk Pipelines has credit risk with both its existing customers and those supporting its growth projects. Credit risk exists in relation to Boardwalk Pipelines’ growth projects, both because expansion customers make long term firm capacity commitments to Boardwalk Pipelines for such projects and certain of those expansion customers agree to provide credit support as construction for such projects progresses. If a customer fails to post the required credit support or defaults during the growth project process, overall returns on the project may be reduced to the extent an adjustment to the scope of the project occurs or Boardwalk Pipelines is unable to replace the defaulting customer with a customer willing to pay similar rates. In 2020 and 2019, two expansion customers declared bankruptcy for which Boardwalk Pipelines was able to use the credit support obtained during the growth project process to cover a portion of the customer’s remaining long term commitment.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ credit exposure also includes receivables for services provided, future performance under firm agreements and volumes of gas owed by customers for imbalances or gas loaned by Boardwalk Pipelines to them under certain NNS and parking and lending (“PAL”) services.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ revolving credit facility contains operating and financial covenants that restrict its business and financing activities.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ revolving credit facility contains operating and financial covenants that may restrict its ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to expand or pursue business activities. Its credit agreement limits its ability to make loans or investments, make material changes to the nature of its business, merge, consolidate or engage in asset sales, or grant liens or make negative pledges. This agreement also requires it to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) of not more than 5.0 to 1.0, or up to 5.5 to 1.0 for the three quarters following a qualified acquisition or series of acquisitions, where the purchase price exceeds $100.0 million over a rolling 12-month period, which limits the amount of additional indebtedness Boardwalk Pipelines can incur to grow its business, and could require it to reduce indebtedness if its earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) decreases to a level that would cause it to breach this covenant. Future financing agreements Boardwalk Pipelines may enter into could contain similar or more restrictive covenants or may not be as favorable as those under its existing indebtedness.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in its credit agreement may be affected by events beyond its control, including economic, financial and market conditions. If market, economic conditions or its financial performance deteriorate, its ability to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If Boardwalk Pipelines is not able to incur additional indebtedness, it may be required to seek other sources of funding that may be on less favorable terms. If it defaults under its credit agreement or another financing agreement, significant additional restrictions may become applicable. In addition, a default could result in a significant portion of its indebtedness becoming immediately due and payable, and its lenders could terminate their commitment to make further loans to it. If such event occurs, Boardwalk Pipelines would not have, and may not be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ substantial indebtedness could affect its ability to meet its obligations and may otherwise restrict its activities.
As of December 31, 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines had $3.5 billion in principal amount of long-term debt outstanding, including amounts borrowed under its revolving credit facility. This level of debt requires significant interest payments. Boardwalk Pipelines’ inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, or to refinance its obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have a material adverse effect on its business. Boardwalk Pipelines’ substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:
|
•
|
limit Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to borrow money for its working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other general business activities;
|
|
•
|
impact the ratings received from credit rating agencies;
|
|
•
|
increase Boardwalk Pipelines’ vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and
|
|
•
|
limit Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to respond to business opportunities, including growing its business through acquisitions.
|
Boardwalk Pipelines is permitted, under its revolving credit facility and the indentures governing its notes, to incur additional debt, subject to certain limitations under its revolving credit facility and, in the case of unsecured debt, under the indentures governing the notes. If Boardwalk Pipelines incurs additional debt, its increased leverage could also result in the consequences described above.
Limited access to the debt markets and increases in interest rates could adversely affect Boardwalk Pipelines’ business.
Boardwalk Pipelines anticipates funding its capital spending requirements through its available financing options, including cash generated from operations and borrowings under its revolving credit facility. Changes in the debt markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and an increase in interest rates, may increase the cost of financing as well as the risks of refinancing maturing debt. This may affect its ability to raise needed funding and reduce the amount of cash available to fund its operations or growth projects. If the debt markets were not available, it is not certain if other adequate financing options would be available to Boardwalk Pipelines on terms and conditions that it would find acceptable.
Any disruption in the debt markets could require Boardwalk Pipelines to take additional measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until it can arrange alternative credit arrangements or other funding for its business needs. Such measures could include reducing or delaying business activities, reducing its operations to lower expenses and reducing other discretionary uses of cash. Boardwalk Pipelines may be unable to execute its growth strategy or take advantage of certain business opportunities.
Boardwalk Pipelines does not own all of the land on which its pipelines and facilities are located, which could result in disruptions to its operations.
Substantial portions of Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines, storage and other facilities are constructed and maintained on property owned by others pursuant to rights-of-way, easements, permits, licenses or consents, and Boardwalk Pipelines is subject to the possibility of more onerous terms and/or increased costs to retain necessary land use rights if it does not have valid land use rights or if such land use rights lapse or terminate. Some of the rights to construct and operate Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines storage or other facilities on land owned by third parties and governmental agencies that it obtains are for specific periods of time. Boardwalk Pipelines cannot guarantee that it will always be able to renew, when necessary, existing land use rights or obtain new land use rights without experiencing significant costs or experiencing landowner opposition. Any loss of these land use rights with respect to the operation of Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines, storage and other facilities, through its inability to renew right-of-way or easement contracts or permits, licenses, consents or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on its operations.
Rising sea levels, subsidence and erosion could damage Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines and the facilities that serve its customers, particularly along coastal waters and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipeline operations along coastal waters and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico could be impacted by rising sea levels, subsidence and erosion. Subsidence issues are also a concern for Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipelines at major river crossings. Rising sea levels, subsidence and erosion could cause serious damage to its pipelines, which could affect its ability to provide transportation services or result in leakage, migration, releases or spills from its operations to surface or subsurface soils, surface water, groundwater or offshore waters, which could result in liability, remedial obligations and/or otherwise have a negative impact on continued operations. Such rising sea levels, subsidence and erosion processes could impact Boardwalk Pipelines’ customers who operate along coastal waters or offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, and they may be unable to utilize Boardwalk Pipelines services. Rising sea levels, subsidence and erosion could also expose Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations to increased risks associated with severe weather conditions and other adverse events and conditions, such as hurricanes and flooding. As a result, Boardwalk Pipelines may incur significant costs to repair and preserve its pipeline infrastructure. In recent years, local governments and landowners have filed lawsuits in Louisiana against energy companies, alleging that their operations contributed to increased coastal rising seas and erosion and seeking substantial damages.
Boardwalk Pipelines may not be successful in executing its strategy to grow and diversify its business.
Boardwalk Pipelines relies primarily on the revenues generated from its natural gas transportation and storage services. Negative developments in these services have significantly greater impact on Boardwalk Pipelines’ financial condition and results of operations than if it maintained more diverse assets. Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to grow, diversify and increase cash flows will depend, in part, on its ability to expand its existing business lines and to close and execute on accretive acquisitions. Boardwalk Pipelines may not be successful in acquiring or developing such assets or may do so on terms that ultimately are not profitable. Any such transactions involve potential risks that may include, among other things:
|
•
|
the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention from other business concerns;
|
|
•
|
inaccurate assumptions about volume, revenues and project costs, including potential synergies;
|
|
•
|
a decrease in Boardwalk Pipelines’ liquidity as a result of using available cash or borrowing capacity to finance the acquisition or project;
|
|
•
|
a significant increase in interest expense or financial leverage if it incurs additional debt to finance the acquisition or project or if Boardwalk Pipelines makes inaccurate assumptions about the overall costs of debt;
|
|
•
|
an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage and operate the acquired business and assets or the developed assets;
|
|
•
|
unforeseen difficulties operating in new product areas or new geographic areas; and
|
|
•
|
changes in regulatory requirements or delays of regulatory approvals.
|
Additionally, acquisitions also contain the following risks:
|
•
|
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses Boardwalk Pipelines acquires;
|
|
•
|
the assumption of unknown liabilities for which it is not indemnified, for which its indemnity is inadequate or for which its insurance policies may exclude from coverage;
|
|
•
|
limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller; and
|
|
•
|
customer or key employee losses of an acquired business.
|
Boardwalk Pipelines’ ability to replace expiring gas storage contracts at attractive rates or on a long-term basis and to sell short-term services at attractive rates or at all are subject to market conditions.
Boardwalk Pipelines owns and operates substantial natural gas storage facilities. The market for the storage and PAL services that it offers is impacted by the factors and market conditions discussed above for Boardwalk Pipelines’ transportation services, and is also impacted by natural gas price differentials between time periods, such as winter to summer (time period price spreads), and the volatility in time period price spreads. When market conditions cause a narrowing of time period price spreads and a decline in the price volatility of natural gas, these factors adversely impact the rates Boardwalk Pipelines can charge for its storage and PAL services.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations are subject to catastrophic losses, operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions for which it may not be adequately insured.
There are a variety of operating risks inherent in transporting and storing natural gas, ethylene and NGLs, such as leaks and other forms of releases, explosions, fires, cyber-attacks and mechanical problems, which could have catastrophic consequences. Additionally, the nature and location of Boardwalk Pipelines’ business may make it susceptible to catastrophic losses from hurricanes or other named storms, particularly with regard to its assets in the Gulf Coast region, windstorms, earthquakes, hail, and other severe weather. Any of these or other similar occurrences could result in the disruption of Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations, substantial repair costs, personal injury or loss of life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of its operations and substantial financial losses. The location of pipelines in HCAs, which includes populated areas, residential areas, commercial business centers and industrial sites, could significantly increase the level of damages resulting from some of these risks.
Boardwalk Pipelines currently possesses property, business interruption, cyber threat and general liability insurance, but proceeds from such insurance coverage may not be adequate for all liabilities or expenses incurred or revenues lost. Moreover, such insurance may not be available in the future at commercially reasonable costs and terms. The insurance coverage Boardwalk Pipelines does obtain may contain large deductibles or fail to cover certain events, hazards or all potential losses.
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Loews Hotels & Co
The COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to mitigate the spread of the virus have had, and are expected to continue to have, material adverse impacts on Loews Hotels & Co’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows
.
In response to the spread of COVID-19, governments across the globe implemented measures to mitigate the spread of the virus, such as through city, regional or national lockdowns or stay-at-home orders, narrowly defined and widespread business closures, restrictions on travel, limitations on large group gatherings and quarantines, among others. Beyond the existence of governmental restrictions, the perception of health risks associated with COVID-19 has limited, and continues to further limit, business and leisure travel. Furthermore, theme parks in Orlando, Florida, which temporarily closed, now operate at reduced capacity levels. In addition, certain coastal beaches repeatedly have been ordered closed and professional sports leagues have suspended or modified their seasons with no or limited spectators permitted in attendance. The spread of the coronavirus and the containment efforts have had, and continue to have, macro-economic implications, including increased unemployment levels, declines in economic growth rates and possibly a global recession, the effects of which could be felt well beyond the time the spread of the virus is mitigated or contained. These developments have caused unprecedented disruptions to the global economy and normal business operations across sectors, including the hospitality industry that depends on active levels of business and leisure travel, very little of which is occurring in the current environment.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to mitigate the spread of the virus, beginning in March of 2020, Loews Hotels & Co temporarily suspended operations at the majority of its owned and/or operated hotels. Since then, most hotels have resumed operations, but occupancy rates remain considerably lower than those from the prior year, or even occupancy rates prior to March of 2020. As such, revenues have been substantially lower and may be insufficient to offset certain fixed costs, such as insurance and property taxes. As of February 5, 2021, five hotels have suspended operations. These five hotels continue to be evaluated to determine when it will be prudent to resume operations. The potential for the suspension or resuspension of operations at operating hotels varies by hotel property and will depend on numerous factors, many of which are outside Loews Hotels & Co’s control. In addition, as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, Loews Hotels & Co has had to implement a number of new measures for the health and safety of its guests and employees. These new measures, which may need to remain in place for the foreseeable future, have resulted and will continue to result in increased costs.
Given that Loews Hotels & Co owns and leases, relative to some of its competitors, a higher proportion of its hotel properties, compared to the number of properties that it manages for third-party owners, it may as a result of COVID-19 and mitigation measures face increased risks associated with mortgage debt, including the possibility of default, cash trap periods, the inability to draw further loan disbursements and reduced availability of replacement financing at reasonable terms or at all; difficulty reducing costs; declines in real estate values and potential additional impairments in the value of Loews Hotels & Co’s assets; and a limited ability to respond to market conditions. In addition, uncertain or fluctuating real estate valuations and the inability for third-party purchasers to obtain capital may prevent Loews Hotels & Co from selling properties on acceptable terms.
The full extent and duration of the impacts caused by the COVID-19 outbreak on Loews Hotels & Co’s business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows remains largely uncertain and dependent on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time, such as the continued severity, duration (including the extent of any resurgences in the future), transmission rate and geographic spread of COVID-19 in the United States, Canada and elsewhere, the extent and effectiveness of the containment measures taken, the timing of and manner in which containment efforts are reduced or lifted, the timing and ability of vaccinations and other treatments to combat COVID-19, and the response of the overall economy, financial markets and the population, particularly in areas in which Loews Hotels & Co operates, once the current containment measures are reduced or lifted. Accordingly, COVID-19 presents continuing material uncertainty and risk with respect to Loews Hotels & Co’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Even following containment of COVID-19, continuing uncertainty exists around when and if Loews Hotels & Co
will be able to resume normal, pre-COVID-19 level operations for business or leisure travel. O
nce the COVID-19 outbreak is mitigated or contained, whenever that may be, historical travel patterns, both domestic and international, may continue to be disrupted either on a temporary basis or with longer term effects. For example, certain travel is
dependent on commercial airlines restoring capacity, and their inability to restore full capacity could impact demand for Loews Hotels & Co’s services. Additionally, businesses now forced to rely on remote working and videoconferences may reduce the level of business travel both to save costs and to reduce the risk of exposure for their employees, and they may also seek alternatives to large public gatherings such as conferences and conventions. Leisure travelers may also be less inclined to travel or gather in large groups out of ongoing safety concerns, regardless of the lifting of mandated or recommended restrictions. In addition, with the expected adverse impact on jobs and the economy more broadly, at least in the short term, leisure travel will likely be further impacted due to economic reasons.
Further, the demand for lodging, and consumer confidence in travel generally, may not recover as quickly as other industries.
Any of these trends could have continuing material adverse effects on Loews Hotels & Co’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
As part of cost containment efforts, Loews Hotels & Co put a substantial number of its employees on unpaid leaves of absence or have severed them from the organization. When conditions warrant the resumption of operations that necessitate increased staffing levels, it may not be able to find or attract sufficient talent to fill the roles that have been furloughed or eliminated. Additionally, many of its service providers and suppliers have also put their employees on leaves of absence or have severed employees. Should they be unable to find or attract sufficient talent to fill the roles that they have furloughed or eliminated, Loews Hotels & Co may not have the requisite services or supplies available to resume operations at the time or in the manner of its choosing.
Loews Hotels & Co continues to evaluate spending and manage operating expenses, including eliminating non-essential spending, reducing costs related to its management company, marketing, sales, and technology and deferring planned renovations, all of which could impair its ability to compete effectively and harm its business. Loews Hotels & Co has received and may receive additional demands or requests from labor unions that represent its employees, whether in the course of its periodic renegotiation of collective bargaining agreements or otherwise, for additional compensation, healthcare benefits, operational protocols or other terms that could increase costs, and could experience labor disputes or disruptions as it continues to implement mitigation or re-opening plans. Some actions Loews Hotels & Co has taken, or may take in the future, to reduce costs for it or its third-party owners may negatively impact guest loyalty, owner preference, and its ability to attract and retain employees, and its reputation and market share may suffer as a result. Further, once the effects of the pandemic subside, the recovery period could be extensive and certain operational changes, particularly with respect to enhanced health and safety measures, may continue to be necessary and could increase ongoing costs.
Hotels are buildings designed to remain open every hour of every day. As Loews Hotels & Co has not previously suspended the operations of its hotels (other than in connection with planned renovations) for an extended period of time, there may be mechanical systems that require material repair and maintenance to restart for hotels that remain under a suspension of operations, or for facilities and outlets within operational hotels that continue to not be utilized.
Loews Hotels & Co’s construction projects could be delayed as a result of COVID-19 and related containment efforts, including delays applicable to or affecting contractors, suppliers and inspectors required to review projects.
As a manager of hotels owned by joint ventures that Loews Hotels & Co invests in and by third parties, Loews Hotels & Co earns fees based on the revenues that those managed hotels generate. As a result of reduced revenues described above due to COVID-19 and mitigating measures, Loews Hotels & Co’s fee-based revenues are also materially reduced. Certain of these properties also have contracts that require payments by Loews Hotels & Co to preserve its management of the hotel if the hotel’s operating results do not achieve certain performance levels. These payments may be uneconomical for Loews Hotels & Co and lead to Loews Hotels & Co no longer managing one or more of those properties.
In properties in which Loews Hotels & Co has an ownership interest, Loews Hotels & Co leases space to third-party tenants and earns both fixed and variable amounts of rent, depending on each underlying lease arrangement. Some of these tenants informed Loews Hotels & Co that their operations are similarly impacted by COVID-19 business restrictions causing rent abatement periods in certain circumstances. In addition, variable rent, which is generally tied to the tenant’s sales, has been, and will continue to be, materially adversely affected by the effects of the pandemic.
Loews Hotels & Co’s business may be materially adversely affected by various operating risks common to the hospitality industry, including competition, excess supply and dependence on business travel and tourism.
Loews Hotels & Co owns and operates hotels that have different economic characteristics than many other real estate assets. A typical office property, for example, has long-term leases with third-party tenants, which provide a relatively stable long-term stream of revenue. Hotels, on the other hand, generate revenue from guests that typically stay at the hotel for only a few nights, which causes the room rate and occupancy levels at each hotel to change every day, and results in earnings that can be highly volatile.
In addition, Loews Hotels & Co’s properties are subject to various operating risks common to the hospitality industry, many of which are beyond Loews Hotels & Co’s control, including:
|
•
|
changes in general economic conditions, including the severity and duration of any downturn in the U.S. or global economy and financial markets, as well as more localized changes in the economy of each hotel’s geographic location;
|
|
•
|
war, political conditions or civil unrest, terrorist activities or threats and heightened travel security measures instituted in response to these events;
|
|
•
|
outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, such as the recent coronavirus;
|
|
•
|
federal, state or local government-mandated travel restrictions and/or shut-down orders of hotels or other drivers that reduce demand for hotel businesses;
|
|
•
|
natural or man-made disasters or other catastrophes;
|
|
•
|
material reductions or prolonged interruptions of public utilities and services;
|
|
•
|
decreased corporate or government travel-related budgets and spending and cancellations, deferrals or renegotiations of group business due to self-imposed and/or government-mandated travel restrictions, adverse economic conditions or otherwise;
|
|
•
|
decreased need for business-related travel due to innovations in business-related technology;
|
|
•
|
competition from other hotels and alternative accommodations, such as Airbnb, in the markets in which Loews Hotels & Co operates;
|
|
•
|
requirements for periodic capital reinvestment to maintain and upgrade hotels;
|
|
•
|
increases in operating costs, including labor (such as from minimum wage increases), workers’ compensation, benefits, insurance, food and beverage, commodity costs, energy and unanticipated costs resulting from force majeure events, due to inflation, new or different federal, state or local governmental regulations, including tariffs, constrained supply, and other factors that may not be offset by increased revenues;
|
|
•
|
the costs and administrative burdens associated with compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
|
|
•
|
organized labor activities, which could cause a diversion of business from hotels involved in labor negotiations and loss of business for Loews Hotels & Co’s properties generally as a result of certain labor tactics;
|
|
•
|
changes in the desirability of particular locations or travel patterns of customers, including with respect to the underlying attractions supporting Loews Hotels & Co’s immersive destination properties, such as the Universal theme park for its Orlando, Florida properties, and stadiums, arenas and convention centers for properties in other markets;
|
|
•
|
geographic concentration of operations and customers;
|
|
•
|
shortages of desirable locations for development; and
|
|
•
|
relationships with third-party property owners, developers and joint venture partners, including the risk that third-party property owners, developers and/or partners may encounter financial difficulties, may not fulfill material obligations and/or may terminate lease, management, joint venture or other agreements.
|
In addition to materially affecting the business of Loews Hotels & Co generally, these factors, and the reputational repercussions of these factors, could materially adversely affect, and from time to time have materially adversely affected, individual hotels and hotels in particular regions.
Loews Hotels & Co
is exposed to the risks resulting from significant investments in owned and leased real estate, which could increase its costs, reduce its profits, limit its ability to respond to market conditions or restrict its growth strategy.
Loews Hotels & Co’s proportion of owned and leased properties, compared to the number of properties that it manages for third-party owners, is larger than that of some of its competitors. Real estate ownership and leasing is subject to risks not applicable to managed or franchised properties, including:
|
•
|
real estate, insurance, zoning, tax, environmental and eminent domain laws;
|
|
•
|
the ongoing need for owner-funded capital improvements and expenditures to maintain or upgrade properties;
|
|
•
|
risks associated with mortgage debt, including the possibility of default, fluctuating interest rate levels and the availability of replacement financing;
|
|
•
|
risks associated with the possibility that cost increases will outpace revenue increases and that, in the event of an economic slowdown, a high proportion of fixed costs will make it difficult to reduce costs to the extent required to offset declining revenues;
|
|
•
|
risks associated with real estate leases, including the possibility of rent increases and the inability to renew or extend upon favorable terms;
|
|
•
|
risks associated with real estate condominiums, including the possibility of special assessments by condominiums that Loews Hotels & Co does not control;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in real estate values and potential impairments in the value of Loews Hotels & Co’s assets; and
|
|
•
|
the relative illiquidity of real estate compared to some other assets.
|
The hospitality industry is subject to seasonal and cyclical volatility.
The hospitality industry is seasonal in nature. The periods during which Loews Hotels & Co’s properties experience higher revenues vary from property to property, depending principally upon location and the consumer base served. Historically, Loews Hotels & Co generally has experienced revenues and earnings that are lower in the third quarter of each year than in each of the other quarters. In addition, the hospitality industry is cyclical and demand generally follows the general economy on a lagged basis. The seasonality and cyclicality of its industry may contribute to fluctuation in Loews Hotels & Co’s results of operations and financial condition.
Loews Hotels & Co operates in a highly competitive industry, both for customers and for acquisitions and developments of new properties.
The hospitality industry is highly competitive. Loews Hotels & Co’s properties compete with other hotels and alternative accommodations based on a number of factors, including room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels and amenities, location, brand affiliation, reputation and reservation systems. New hotels may be constructed and these additions to supply create new competitors, in some cases without corresponding increases in demand for hotel rooms. Some of its competitors also have greater financial and marketing resources than Loews Hotels & Co. In addition, travelers can book stays on websites that facilitate the short-term rental of homes and apartments from owners, thereby providing an alternative to hotel rooms.
Loews Hotels & Co also competes for hotel acquisitions and development projects with entities that have similar investment objectives as it does. This competition could limit the number of suitable investment opportunities. It may also increase the bargaining power of Loews Hotels & Co’s counterparties, making it more difficult for Loews Hotels & Co to acquire or develop new properties on attractive terms or on the terms contemplated in its business plan.
Any deterioration in the quality or reputation of Loews Hotels & Co’s brands could have a material adverse effect on its reputation and business.
Loews Hotels & Co’s brands and reputation are among its most important assets. Its ability to attract and retain guests depends, in part, on the public recognition of its brands and their associated reputation. If its brands become obsolete or consumers view them as unfashionable or lacking in consistency and quality, or its brands or reputation are otherwise harmed, Loews Hotels & Co may be unable to attract guests to its properties, and may further be unable to attract or retain joint venture partners or hotel owners. Loews Hotels & Co’s reputation may also suffer as a result of negative publicity regarding its hotels, including as a result of social media reports, regardless of the accuracy of such publicity. The continued expansion of media and social media formats has compounded the potential scope of negative publicity and has made it more difficult to control and effectively manage negative publicity.
Loews Hotels & Co’s efforts to develop new properties and renovate existing properties could be delayed or become more expensive.
Loews Hotels & Co from time to time needs to renovate its properties and is currently expanding its portfolio through the ground-up construction of a new property in Coral Gables, Florida. Further it may in the future similarly develop additional new properties. Often these projects are undertaken with joint venture partners who may also serve as developer. These renovation and construction efforts are subject to a number of risks, including:
|
•
|
construction delays, changes to plans and specifications and cost overruns (including labor and materials or unforeseeable site conditions) that may increase project costs; cause new development projects to not be completed by lender imposed required completion dates or subject Loews Hotels & Co to cancellation penalties for reservations accepted;
|
|
•
|
obtaining zoning, occupancy and other required permits or authorizations;
|
|
•
|
changes in economic conditions that may result in weakened or lack of demand or negative project returns;
|
|
•
|
governmental restrictions on the size or kind of development;
|
|
•
|
projects financed with construction debt are subject to interest rate risk as uncertain timing and amount of draws make effective hedging difficult to obtain;
|
|
•
|
weather delays and force majeure events, including earthquakes, tornados, hurricanes or floods; and
|
|
•
|
design defects that could increase costs.
|
Additionally, developing new properties typically involves lengthy development periods during which significant amounts of capital must be funded before the properties begin to operate and generate revenue. If the cost of funding new development exceeds budgeted amounts, and/or the time period for development is longer than initially anticipated, Loews Hotels & Co’s operating results could be reduced. Further, due to the lengthy development cycle, intervening adverse economic conditions in general and as they apply to Loews Hotels & Co and its development partners may alter or impede the development plans, thereby resulting in incremental costs or potential impairment charges. In addition, using multiple sources of capital to develop new properties reduces or eliminates the ability of Loews Hotels & Co to cease commenced projects if the overall economic environment conditions change. Moreover, during the early stages of operations, charges related to interest expense and depreciation may substantially detract from, or even outweigh, the profitability of certain new property investments.
Co-investing in hotel properties decreases Loews Hotels & Co’s ability to manage risk
.
Loews Hotels & Co has from time to time invested, and expects to continue to invest, in hotel properties or businesses as a co-investor. Co-investors often have shared control over the operation of the property or business. Therefore, the operation of such properties or businesses is subject to inherent risk due to the shared nature of the enterprise and the need to reach agreements on material matters. In addition, investments with other investors may involve risks such as the possibility that the co-investor might become bankrupt or not have the financial resources to meet its obligations, or have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with Loews Hotels & Co’s business interests or goals. Further, Loews Hotels & Co may be unable to take action without the approval of its co-investors, or its co-investors could take actions binding on the property without the consent of Loews Hotels & Co. Additionally, should a co-investor become bankrupt, Loews Hotels & Co could become liable for its share of liabilities.
Loews Hotels & Co’s properties are geographically concentrated, which exposes its business to the effects of regional events and occurrences.
Loews Hotels & Co has a concentration of hotels in Florida. Specifically, as of December 31, 2020, eight hotels, representing 54% of rooms in its system, were located at Universal Orlando in Orlando, Florida and nine hotels, representing approximately 59% of rooms in its system, were located in Florida. The concentration of hotels in one region or a limited number of markets may expose Loews Hotels & Co to risks of adverse economic and other developments that are greater than if its portfolio were more geographically diverse. These developments include regional economic downturns, a decline in the popularity of or access to area tourist attractions, such as theme parks, significant increases in the number of Loews Hotels & Co’s competitors’ hotels in these markets and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes, property insurance costs or other expenses in the geographic markets in which it is concentrated. In addition, Loews Hotels & Co’s properties in Florida are subject to the effects of adverse acts of nature, such as hurricanes, strong winds and flooding, which have in the past caused damage to its hotels in Florida, and which may in the future be intensified as a result of climate change, as well as outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases. Loews Hotels & Co’s business may be significantly affected by other risks common to the Florida tourism industry. For example, the cost and availability of air services and the impact of any events that disrupt or reduce air travel to and from Florida for any reason can adversely affect its business.
The growth and use of alternative reservation channels adversely affects Loews Hotels & Co’s business.
A significant percentage of hotel rooms for guests at Loews Hotels & Co’s properties is booked through internet travel and other intermediaries. In most cases, Loews Hotels & Co has agreements with such intermediaries and pays them commissions and/or fees for sales of its rooms through their systems. If such bookings increase, these intermediaries may be able to obtain higher commissions or fees, reduced room rates or other significant concessions from Loews Hotels & Co. There can be no assurance that Loews Hotels & Co will be able to negotiate such agreements in the future with terms as favorable as those that exist today. Moreover, these intermediaries generally employ aggressive marketing strategies, including expending significant resources for online and television advertising campaigns to drive consumers to their websites and other outlets. As a result, consumers may develop brand loyalties to the intermediaries’ offered brands, websites and reservations systems rather than to Loews Hotels & Co’s brands.
Loews Hotels & Co’s insurance coverage may not cover all possible losses, and it may not be able to renew its insurance policies on favorable terms, or at all.
Although Loews Hotels & Co maintains various property, casualty and other insurance policies, proceeds from such insurance coverage may not be adequate for all liabilities or expenses incurred or revenues lost. Additionally, insurance policies that it maintains may not be available in the future at commercially reasonable costs and terms. The insurance coverage Loews Hotels & Co maintains may contain large deductibles or may not cover all risks to which its properties are potentially subject.
Labor shortages could restrict Loews Hotels & Co’s ability to operate its properties or grow its business or result in increased labor costs that could reduce its results of operations.
Loews Hotels & Co’s properties are staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week by thousands of employees. If it is unable to attract, retain, train and engage skilled employees, its ability to manage and staff its properties adequately could be impaired, which could reduce customer satisfaction. Staffing shortages could also hinder its ability to grow and expand its business. Because payroll costs are a major component of the operating expenses at its properties, a shortage of skilled labor could also require higher wages that would increase its labor costs.
A portion of Loews Hotels & Co’s labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements.
Work stoppages and other labor problems could negatively affect Loews Hotels & Co’s business and results of operations. A prolonged dispute with covered employees or any labor unrest, strikes or other business interruptions in connection with labor negotiations or otherwise could have an adverse impact on Loews Hotels & Co’s operations. Adverse publicity in the marketplace related to union messaging could further harm its reputation and reduce customer demand for its services. Also, wage and/or benefit increases resulting from new labor agreements may be significant and could have an adverse impact on its results of operations. To the extent that Loews Hotels & Co’s non-union employees join unions, Loews Hotels & Co would have greater exposure to risks associated with such labor problems. Furthermore, Loews Hotels & Co may have, or acquire in the future, multi-employer plans that are classified as “endangered,” “seriously endangered,” or “critical” status and a withdrawal in the future could result in the incurrence of a contingent liability that would be payable in an amount and at such time (or over a period of time) that would vary based on a number of factors at the time of (and after) withdrawal. Any such events or additional costs may have materially adverse effects.
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Altium Packaging
The COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse impact on Altium Packaging.
Altium Packaging manufactures packaging that is used with products in critical sectors, such as the pharmaceutical, household and industrial cleaning and food and beverage markets, and is thus an essential business as contemplated by state and local orders. It therefore has operated, and continues to operate, nearly all of its manufacturing facilities at full capacity to support those sectors. However, certain of Altium Packaging’s end markets, such as its commercial food services, institutional food and automotive customers, have been negatively impacted and its sales to those customers have been adversely affected. In addition, if widespread infections were to affect any of its facilities or workers, including those supporting critical sectors, it may be required to temporarily shut down or otherwise modify the working conditions at such facilities to address the infections. Any such changes could cause Altium Packaging to be unable to meet demand from its customers if it cannot provide support from other facilities in its network.
Altium Packaging’s substantial indebtedness could affect its ability to meet its obligations and may otherwise restrict its activities.
Altium Packaging has a significant amount of indebtedness, which requires significant interest payments. Its inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, or to refinance its obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have a material adverse effect on its business. Altium Packaging’s substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:
|
•
|
limit its ability to borrow money for its working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other corporate purposes;
|
|
•
|
increase its vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and
|
|
•
|
limit its ability to respond to business opportunities, including growing its business through acquisitions.
|
In addition, the credit agreements governing its current indebtedness contain, and any future debt instruments would likely contain, financial and other restrictive covenants, which impose operating and financial restrictions on it. As a result of these covenants, Altium Packaging could be limited in the manner in which it conducts its business and may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs. Furthermore, a failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on Altium Packaging.
Altium Packaging is exposed to changes in consumer preferences.
Sales of Altium Packaging’s plastic containers depend heavily on the volume of sales made by its customers to consumers. Consequently, changes in consumer preferences for products in the industries that it serves or the packaging formats in which such products are delivered, whether as a result of changes in cost, convenience or health, environmental and social concerns or perceptions regarding plastics, may result in a decline in the demand for Altium Packaging’s plastic container products.
Fluctuations in raw material prices and raw material availability may materially affect Altium Packaging’s results of operations.
To produce its products, Altium Packaging uses large quantities of plastic resins and recycled plastic materials. It faces the risk that its access to these raw materials may be interrupted or that it may not be able to purchase these raw materials at prices that are acceptable to it. In general, Altium Packaging does not have long-term supply contracts with its suppliers, and its purchases of raw materials are subject to market price volatility. Although Altium Packaging generally is able to pass changes in the prices of raw materials through to its customers over a period of time, it may not always be able to do so or there may be a lag between when its costs increase and when it passes those costs through to its customers. It may not be able to pass through all future raw material price increases in a timely manner or at all due to competitive pressures. In addition, a sustained increase in resin and recycled plastic prices, relative to alternative packaging materials, would make plastic containers less economical for its customers and could result in reductions in the use of plastic containers. Any limitation on its ability to procure its primary raw materials or to pass through price increases in such materials on a timely basis could materially negatively affect Altium Packaging.
Altium Packaging’s customers may increase their self-manufacturing.
Increased self-manufacturing by Altium Packaging’s customers may have a material adverse impact on its sales volume and financial results. Altium Packaging believes that its customers may engage in self-manufacturing over time at locations where transportation costs are high, and where low complexity and available space to install blow molding equipment exist.
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiaries Generally
In addition to the specific risks and uncertainties faced by our subsidiaries, as discussed above, we and all of our subsidiaries face additional risks and uncertainties described below.
The COVID-19 pandemic is having widespread impacts on the way we and our subsidiaries operate.
The spread of COVID-19 and mitigating measures has had, and continues to have, macroeconomic implications, including increased unemployment levels, declines in economic growth rates and possibly a global recession, the effects of which could be felt well beyond the time during which the spread of the virus is mitigated or contained. These developments have caused unprecedented disruptions to the global economy and normal business operations across sectors and countries, including the sectors and countries in which we and our subsidiaries operate. Because of the size and breadth of the pandemic, all of the direct and indirect consequences of COVID-19 are not yet known and may not emerge for some time.
As a result of workplace restrictions, both voluntary and those imposed by governmental authorities, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, large portions of our and our subsidiaries’ employees are working from home, which, among other things, may disrupt their productivity. Similar workplace restrictions are in place at many of our and our subsidiaries’ critical vendors, which may result in interruptions in service delivery or failure by vendors to properly perform required services. In addition, having shifted to remote working arrangements and being more dependent on internet and telecommunications access and capabilities, we and our subsidiaries also face a heightened risk of cybersecurity attacks or data security incidents. We and our subsidiaries also self-insure our health benefits and therefore may experience increased medical claims as a result of the pandemic.
Acts of terrorism could harm us and our subsidiaries.
Terrorist attacks and the continued threat of terrorism in the United States or abroad, the continuation or escalation of existing armed hostilities or the outbreak of additional hostilities, including military and other action by the United States and its allies, could have a significant impact on us and the assets and businesses of our subsidiaries. CNA issues coverages that are exposed to risk of loss from an act of terrorism. Terrorist acts or the threat of terrorism could also result in increased political, economic and financial market instability, a decline in energy consumption and volatility in the price of oil and gas, which could affect the market for Boardwalk Pipelines’ transportation and storage services. In addition, future terrorist attacks could lead to reductions in business travel and tourism which could harm Loews Hotels & Co. While our subsidiaries take steps that they believe are appropriate to secure their assets, there is no assurance that they can completely secure them against a terrorist attack or obtain adequate insurance coverage for terrorist acts at reasonable rates.
Our subsidiaries face significant risks related to compliance with environmental laws.
Our subsidiaries have extensive obligations and financial exposure related to compliance with federal, state, local, foreign and international environmental laws, including those relating to the discharge of substances into the environment, the disposal, removal or clean up of hazardous wastes and other activities relating to the protection of the environment. Many of such laws have become increasingly stringent in recent years and may in some cases impose strict liability, which could be substantial, rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault on the part of that person. For example, Boardwalk Pipelines is subject to environmental laws and regulations, including requiring the acquisition of permits or other approvals to conduct regulated activities, restricting the manner in which it disposes of waste, requiring remedial action to remove or mitigate contamination resulting from a spill or other release and requiring capital expenditures to comply with pollution control requirements. In addition, Altium Packaging may be adversely affected by laws or regulations concerning environmental matters that increase the cost of producing, or otherwise adversely affect the demand for, plastic products. Further, existing environmental laws or the interpretation or enforcement thereof may be amended and new laws may be adopted in the future.
Failures or interruptions in or breaches to our or our subsidiaries’ computer systems could materially and adversely affect our or our subsidiaries’ operations.
We and our subsidiaries are dependent upon information technologies, computer systems and networks, including those maintained by us and our subsidiaries and those maintained and provided to us and our subsidiaries by third parties (for example, “software-as-a-service” and cloud solutions), to conduct operations and are reliant on technology to help increase efficiency in our and their businesses. We and our subsidiaries are dependent upon operational and
financial computer systems to process the data necessary to conduct almost all aspects of our and their businesses. Any failure of our or our subsidiaries’ computer systems, or those of our or their customers, vendors or others with whom we and they do business, could materially disrupt business operations. Computer, telecommunications and other business facilities and systems could become unavailable or impaired from a variety of causes, including storms and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, fires, utility outages, theft, design defects, human error or complications encountered as existing systems are replaced or upgraded. In addition, it has been reported that unknown entities or groups have mounted so-called “cyber attacks” on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. In particular, the U.S. government has issued public warnings that indicate energy assets may be specific targets of cyber attacks, which can have catastrophic consequences and hotel chains, among other consumer-facing businesses, have been subject to various cyber attacks targeting payment card and other sensitive consumer information. Breaches of our and our subsidiaries’ computer security infrastructure can result from actions by our employees, vendors, third party administrators or by unknown third parties, and may disrupt our or their operations, cause significant damage to our or their assets and surrounding areas, cause loss of life or serious bodily injury and impact our or their data framework or cause a failure to protect personal information of customers or employees.
The foregoing risks relating to disruption of service, interruption of operations and data loss could impact our and our subsidiaries’ ability to timely perform critical business functions, resulting in disruption or deterioration in our and our subsidiaries’ operations and business and expose us and our subsidiaries to monetary and reputational damages. In addition, potential exposures include substantially increased compliance costs and required computer system upgrades and security related investments. The breach of confidential information also could give rise to legal liability and regulatory action under data protection and privacy laws and regulations, both in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions.
Loss of key vendor relationships or issues relating to the transitioning of vendor relationships could result in a materially adverse effect on our and our subsidiaries’ operations.
We and our subsidiaries rely on products, equipment and services provided by many third-party suppliers, manufacturers and service providers in the United States and abroad, which exposes us and them to volatility in the quality, price and availability of such items. These include, for example, vendors of computer hardware, software and services, as well as other critical materials and services (including, in the case of CNA, claims administrators performing significant claims administration and adjudication functions). Certain products, equipment and services may be available from a limited number of sources. If one or more key vendors becomes unable to continue to provide products, equipment or services at the requisite level for any reason, or fails to protect our proprietary information, including in some cases personal information of employees, customers or hotel guests, we and our subsidiaries may experience a material adverse effect on our or their business, operations and reputation.
We could incur impairment charges related to the carrying value of the long-lived assets and goodwill of our subsidiaries.
Our subsidiaries regularly evaluate their long-lived assets and goodwill for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. Most notably, we could incur impairment charges related to the carrying value of pipeline and storage assets at Boardwalk Pipelines and hotel investments owned by Loews Hotels & Co.
We also test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. Asset impairment evaluations by us and our subsidiaries with respect to both long-lived assets and goodwill are, by nature, highly subjective. The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in materially different carrying values of our assets which could impact the need to record an impairment charge and the amount of any charge taken.
We are a holding company and derive substantially all of our income and cash flow from our subsidiaries.
We rely upon our invested cash balances and distributions from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our obligations and to declare and pay any dividends to holders of our common stock. Our subsidiaries are separate and independent legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to make funds available to us, whether in the form of loans, dividends or otherwise. The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends is subject to,
among other things, the availability of sufficient earnings and funds in such subsidiaries, applicable state laws, including in the case of the insurance subsidiaries of CNA, laws and rules governing the payment of dividends by regulated insurance companies, and their compliance with covenants in their respective loan agreements. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries will generally have priority as to the assets of such subsidiaries over our claims and those of our creditors and shareholders.
We and our subsidiaries face competition for senior executives and qualified specialized talent.
We and our subsidiaries depend on the services of our key personnel, who possess skills critical to the operation of our and their businesses. Our and our subsidiaries’ executive management teams are highly experienced and possess extensive skills in their relevant industries. The ability to retain senior executives and to attract and retain highly skilled professionals and personnel with specialized industry and technical experience is important to our and our subsidiaries’ success and future growth. Competition for this talent can be intense, and we and our subsidiaries may not be successful in our efforts. The unexpected loss of the services of these individuals could have a detrimental effect on us and our subsidiaries and could hinder our and their ability to effectively compete in the various industries in which we and they operate.
From time to time we and our subsidiaries are subject to litigation, for which we and they may be unable to accurately assess the level of exposure and which if adversely determined, may have a significant adverse effect on our or their financial condition or results of operations.
We and our subsidiaries are or may become parties to legal proceedings and disputes. These matters may include, among others, contract disputes, claims disputes, reinsurance disputes, personal injury claims, environmental claims or proceedings, asbestos and other toxic tort claims, intellectual property disputes, disputes related to employment and tax matters and other litigation incidental to our or their businesses. It is difficult to predict the outcome or effect of any litigation matters and the outcome of any pending or future litigation could have a significant impact on our or our subsidiaries’ financial condition or results of operations.
None.
Our corporate headquarters is located in leased office space in two buildings in New York City. Information relating to our subsidiaries’ properties is contained under Item 1.
Information on our legal proceedings is included in Notes 18 and 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included under Item 8. In addition, information regarding the bankruptcy of Diamond Offshore is included in the Overview section of MD&A in Item 7 and Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included under Item 8.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “L”.
The following graph compares annual total return of our Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index (“S&P 500 Index”), our new peer group set forth below (“Loews New Peer Group”) and our old peer group set forth below (“Loews Old Peer Group”) for the five years ended December 31, 2020. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index, the Loews New Peer Group and the Loews Old Peer Group was $100 on December 31, 2015 and that all dividends were reinvested. We seek to construct our peer group based on comparable products and services, revenue composition and size. In reevaluating our peer group this year, we have removed three peers due to the deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore in the second quarter of 2020. In addition, we added seven peers to better reflect the current composition of our operating subsidiaries. We believe these changes to the peer group provide a more meaningful comparison in terms of comparable products and services, revenue composition and size.
|
|
||||||
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
|
|
Loews Common Stock
|
100.0
|
122.71
|
131.78
|
120.51
|
139.66
|
120.54
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
100.0
|
111.96
|
136.40
|
130.42
|
171.49
|
203.04
|
|
Loews New Peer Group
(a)
|
100.0
|
125.12
|
130.52
|
116.53
|
146.51
|
126.42
|
|
Loews Old Peer Group
(b)
|
100.0
|
116.08
|
119.57
|
112.18
|
137.91
|
132.60
|
| (a) |
The Loews New Peer Group consists of the following companies that are industry peers of our principal operating subsidiaries: Berry Global, Inc., Chubb Limited (name change from ACE Limited after it acquired The Chubb Corporation on January 15, 2016), Diamond Rock Hospitality Company, Enbridge Inc., Energy Transfer LP, Kinder Morgan, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., Silgan Holdings Inc., Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., The Travelers Companies, Inc., W.R. Berkley Corporation and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
| (b) |
The Loews Old Peer Group consists of the following companies that are industry peers of our principal operating subsidiaries: Chubb Limited (name change from ACE Limited after it acquired The Chubb Corporation on January 15, 2016), W.R. Berkley Corporation, The Chubb Corporation (included through January 15, 2016 when it was acquired by ACE Limited), Energy Transfer Partners L.P. (included through October 18, 2018 when it merged with Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.), Valaris plc (name change from ENSCO plc), The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Noble Corporation plc, Spectra Energy Corp (included through February 24, 2017 when it was acquired by Enbridge Inc.), Transocean Ltd. and The Travelers Companies, Inc.
|
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2020 with respect to our equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.
|
|
Number of
|
||
|
securities remaining
|
|||
|
Number of
|
available for future
|
||
|
securities to be
|
issuance under
|
||
|
issued upon exercise
|
Weighted average
|
equity compensation
|
|
|
of outstanding
|
exercise price of
|
plans (excluding
|
|
|
options, warrants
|
outstanding options,
|
securities reflected
|
|
|
Plan category
|
and rights
|
warrants and rights
|
in the first column)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
(a)
|
2,632,375
|
$41.65
|
5,487,192
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
(b)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
| (a) |
Reflects 2,062,256 outstanding stock appreciation rights awarded under the Loews Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, 516,403 outstanding unvested time-based and performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and 53,716 deferred vested time-based RSUs awarded under the Loews Corporation 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan. The weighted average exercise price does not take into account RSUs as they do not have an exercise price.
|
| (b) |
We do not have equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our shareholders.
|
Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders
As of February 1, 2020, we had approximately 670 holders of record of our common stock.
Our Board of Directors has authorized our management, as it deems appropriate, to purchase, in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, our outstanding common stock.
During the fourth quarter of 2020, we purchased shares of our common stock as follows:
|
Period
|
(a) Total number
of shares
purchased
|
(b) Average
price paid per
share
|
(c) Total number of shares purchased as
part of publicly announced plans or programs
|
(d) Maximum number of shares (or approximate dollar value)
of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (in millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020
|
667,071
|
$
|
34.45
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||
|
November 1, 2020 - November 30, 2020
|
1,242,559
|
39.64
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||||||||
|
December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020
|
3,930,645
|
43.73
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||||||||
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table presents selected financial data. The table should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
2017
(a)
|
2016
(a)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Results of Operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
12,583
|
$
|
14,931
|
$
|
14,066
|
$
|
13,735
|
$
|
13,105
|
||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
$
|
(1,464
|
)
|
$
|
1,119
|
$
|
834
|
$
|
1,582
|
$
|
936
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(1,291
|
)
|
$
|
871
|
$
|
706
|
$
|
1,412
|
$
|
716
|
|||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
360
|
61
|
(70
|
)
|
(248
|
)
|
(62
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
(931
|
)
|
$
|
932
|
$
|
636
|
$
|
1,164
|
$
|
654
|
|||||||||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
(3.32
|
)
|
$
|
3.07
|
$
|
1.99
|
$
|
3.45
|
$
|
1.93
|
|||||||||
|
Financial Position:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investments
|
$
|
53,844
|
$
|
51,250
|
$
|
48,186
|
$
|
52,226
|
$
|
50,711
|
||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
80,236
|
82,243
|
78,316
|
79,586
|
76,594
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Debt
|
10,109
|
11,533
|
11,376
|
11,533
|
10,778
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
17,860
|
19,119
|
18,518
|
19,204
|
18,163
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cash dividends per share
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Book value per share
|
66.34
|
65.71
|
59.34
|
57.83
|
53.96
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Shares outstanding
|
269.21
|
290.97
|
312.07
|
332.09
|
336.62
|
|||||||||||||||
| (a) |
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10); Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” Prior period revenues were not adjusted for the adoption of either of these standards.
|
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is comprised of the following sections:
|
|
Page
|
|
No.
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
77
|
Loews Corporation is a holding company and has five reportable segments comprised of three individual consolidated operating subsidiaries, CNA Financial Corporation (“CNA”), Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (“Boardwalk Pipelines”) and Loews Hotels Holding Corporation (“Loews Hotels & Co”); the Corporate segment and Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. (“Diamond Offshore”). The Corporate segment is primarily comprised of Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries and the operations of Altium Packaging LLC (“Altium Packaging”). Diamond Offshore was deconsolidated during the second quarter of 2020. Each of the operating subsidiaries and Diamond Offshore are headed by a chief executive officer who is responsible for the operation of its business and has the duties and authority commensurate with that position.
On April 26, 2020 (the “Filing Date”), Diamond Offshore and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Chapter 11 Filing”). As a result of the Chapter 11 Filing and applicable U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, Loews Corporation no longer controls Diamond Offshore for accounting purposes. Therefore, Diamond Offshore was deconsolidated from the Company’s consolidated financial statements, effective as of the Filing Date, resulting in the recognition of a loss of $1.2 billion ($957 million after tax) during the year ended December 31, 2020. Results of operations for Diamond Offshore through the Filing Date included an aggregate asset impairment charge of $774 million ($408 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) recognized in the first quarter of 2020. For further information see the Diamond Offshore section of this MD&A.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “Company” as used herein means Loews Corporation including its subsidiaries, the terms “Parent Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or like terms as used herein mean Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries, the term “Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation” as used herein means Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation shareholders and the term “subsidiaries” means the Loews Corporation’s consolidated subsidiaries.
We rely upon our invested cash balances and distributions from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our obligations and to declare and pay any dividends to our shareholders. The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends is subject to, among other things, the availability of sufficient earnings and funds in such subsidiaries, applicable state laws, including in the case of the insurance subsidiaries of CNA, laws and rules governing the payment of dividends by regulated insurance companies (see Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8) and compliance with covenants in their respective loan agreements. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries will generally have priority as to the assets of such subsidiaries over our claims and those of our creditors and shareholders.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 1A, Risk Factors, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K. For a discussion of changes in results of operations comparing the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 for Loews Corporation and its subsidiaries see
Part II, Item 7,
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019
, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020.
The following table summarizes net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation by segment and net income (loss) per share attributable to Loews Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||
|
CNA Financial
|
$
|
618
|
$
|
894
|
||||
|
Boardwalk Pipelines
|
206
|
209
|
||||||
|
Loews Hotels & Co
|
(212
|
)
|
(31
|
)
|
||||
|
Corporate
(a)
|
(1,067
|
)
|
35
|
|||||
|
Diamond Offshore
(b)
|
(476
|
)
|
(175
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
(931
|
)
|
$
|
932
|
|||
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
(3.32
|
)
|
$
|
3.08
|
|||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
(3.32
|
)
|
$
|
3.07
|
|||
| (a) |
Includes a net investment loss of $1.2 billion ($957 million after tax) caused by the write down of the carrying value of our interest in Diamond Offshore.
|
| (b) |
Amounts presented for Diamond Offshore reflect the periods prior to deconsolidation. See Notes 2 and 20 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
|
2020 Compared with 2019
Net loss attributable to Loews Corporation for 2020 was $931 million, or $3.32 per share, compared to net income attributable to Loews Corporation of $932 million, or $3.07 per share, in 2019.
The net loss for 2020 was driven by six main factors: (i) an investment loss of $1.2 billion ($957 million after tax) caused by the write down of the carrying value of our interest in Diamond Offshore as a result of its deconsolidation upon its bankruptcy filing on April 26, 2020; (ii) drilling rig impairment charges at Diamond Offshore during the first quarter of 2020 when it was a consolidated subsidiary; (iii) operating losses in 2020 as compared to operating income in 2019 at Loews Hotels; (iv) a reduction in CNA’s and the parent company’s net investment income; (v) net investment losses at CNA in 2020 as compared to net investment gains in 2019; and (vi) lower property and casualty underwriting income at CNA caused mainly by higher catastrophe losses.
The economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and measures to mitigate the spread of the virus have significantly affected Loews’s results in 2020. The full impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s financial results will depend on the duration of mandated and voluntary containment efforts, related economic policies, the success of vaccination efforts in mitigating the pandemic, and other societal responses to the pandemic.
The following table summarizes the results of operations for CNA for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 as presented in Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8. For further discussion of Net investment income and Investment gains (losses), see the Investments section of this MD&A.
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||
|
Insurance premiums
|
$
|
7,649
|
$
|
7,428
|
||||
|
Net investment income
|
1,935
|
2,118
|
||||||
|
Investment gains (losses)
|
(35
|
)
|
49
|
|||||
|
Non-insurance warranty revenue
|
1,252
|
1,161
|
||||||
|
Other revenues
|
26
|
32
|
||||||
|
Total
|
10,827
|
10,788
|
||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits
|
6,170
|
5,806
|
||||||
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs
|
1,410
|
1,383
|
||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty expense
|
1,159
|
1,082
|
||||||
|
Other operating expenses
|
1,125
|
1,141
|
||||||
|
Interest
|
142
|
152
|
||||||
|
Total
|
10,006
|
9,564
|
||||||
|
Income before income tax
|
821
|
1,224
|
||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(131
|
)
|
(224
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income
|
690
|
1,000
|
||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(72
|
)
|
(106
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
618
|
$
|
894
|
||||
2020 Compared with 2019
Net income attributable to Loews Corporation decreased $276 million for 2020 as compared with 2019. The decrease was primarily due to net catastrophe losses of $550 million ($388 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) for 2020 as compared to $179 million ($126 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2019, lower net investment income and investment losses in 2020 as compared with investment gains in 2019. Net catastrophe losses for 2020 include $294 million primarily related to severe weather-related events, $195 million related to COVID-19 and $61 million related to civil unrest. The decrease in net investment income was driven by lower yields in the fixed income portfolio and lower limited partnership and common stock returns. Investment losses were driven by higher impairment losses and the unfavorable change in fair value of non-redeemable preferred stock, partially offset by higher gains on sales of fixed maturity securities. These decreases were partially offset by improved non-catastrophe current accident year underwriting results and a $74 million charge ($52 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) in the third quarter of 2020 as compared to a $216 million charge ($151 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) in the third quarter of 2019 related to recognition of a premium deficiency as a result of the gross premium valuation (“GPV”) review
.
COVID-19 related conditions had a significant impact across CNA during 2020. During the first quarter of 2020, CNA experienced significant declines in the value of its investment portfolio. While financial markets broadly recovered by the end of 2020, CNA’s Net investment income and Investment gains (losses) are lower for 2020 as compared with 2019. CNA also recorded significant catastrophe losses during 2020 related to COVID-19 and recorded a reduction in its estimated audit premiums due to lower exposure. The Company’s 2020 consolidated financial statements reflect its best estimate of the impacts related to COVID-19.
CNA’s Property & Casualty and Other Insurance Operations
CNA’s
commercial property and casualty insurance operations (“
Property & Casualty Operations”) include its Specialty, Commercial and International lines of business. CNA’s Other Insurance Operations outside of Property & Casualty Operations include its long term care business that is in run-off, certain corporate expenses, including interest on CNA’s corporate debt, and certain property and casualty businesses in run-off, including CNA Re and asbestos and environmental pollution (“A&EP”). CNA’s products and services are primarily marketed through independent agents, brokers and managing general underwriters to a wide variety of customers, including small, medium and large businesses, insurance companies, associations, professionals and other groups. We believe the presentation of CNA as one reportable segment is appropriate in accordance with applicable accounting standards on segment reporting. However, for purposes of this discussion and analysis of the results of operations, we provide greater detail with respect to CNA’s Property & Casualty Operations and Other Insurance Operations to enhance the reader’s understanding and to provide further transparency into key drivers of CNA’s financial results.
On December 30, 2020, CNA entered into an agreement with Cavello Bay Reinsurance Limited (“Cavello”), a subsidiary of Enstar Group Limited, under which Cavello reinsured a legacy portfolio of excess workers’ compensation policies. The transaction closed on February 5, 2021 and is based on reserves in place as of January 1, 2020 and adjusted for any subsequent claim activity. This business will be reclassified from the Commercial business to Other Insurance Operations, better reflecting the manner in which CNA is organized for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing performance. The new classifications will be presented in the period ending March 31, 2021, and prior periods presented will conform to the new presentation. Further information on CNA’s retroactive reinsurance agreement is provided in Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
In assessing its insurance operations, CNA utilizes the core income (loss) financial measure. Core income (loss) is calculated by excluding from net income (loss), investment gains or losses and any cumulative effects of changes in accounting guidance. In addition, core income (loss) excludes the effects of noncontrolling interests. The calculation of core income (loss) excludes investment gains or losses because investment gains or losses are generally driven by economic factors that are not necessarily reflective of CNA’s primary insurance operations. Core income (loss) is deemed to be a non-GAAP financial measure and management believes this measure is useful for investors to evaluate its insurance operations.
Property & Casualty Operations
In evaluating the results of Property & Casualty Operations, CNA utilizes the loss ratio, the loss ratio excluding catastrophes and development, the expense ratio, the dividend ratio, the combined ratio and the combined ratio excluding catastrophes and development. These ratios are calculated using GAAP financial results. The loss ratio is the percentage of net incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The loss ratio excluding catastrophes and development excludes net catastrophes losses and changes in estimates of claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, net of reinsurance, for prior years from the loss ratio. The expense ratio is the percentage of insurance underwriting and acquisition expenses, including the amortization of deferred acquisition costs, to net earned premiums. The dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholders’ dividends incurred to net earned premiums. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss, expense and dividend ratios. The combined ratio excluding catastrophes and development is the sum of the loss ratio excluding catastrophes and development, the expense ratio and the dividend ratio. In addition, renewal premium change, rate, retention and new business are also utilized in evaluating operating trends. Renewal premium change represents the estimated change in average premium on policies that renew, including rate and exposure changes. Rate represents the average change in price on policies that renew excluding exposure change. For certain products within Small Business, where quantifiable, rate includes the influence of new business as well. Exposure represents the measure of risk used in the pricing of the insurance product. Retention represents the percentage of premium dollars renewed in comparison to the expiring premium dollars from policies available to renew. Renewal premium change, rate and retention presented for the prior year are updated to reflect subsequent activity on policies written in the period. New business represents premiums from policies written with new customers and additional policies written with existing customers. Gross written premiums, excluding third party captives, excludes business which is ceded to third party captives, including business related to large warranty programs.
The following tables summarize the results of CNA’s Property & Casualty Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
|
Year Ended December 31, 2020
|
Specialty
|
Commercial
|
International
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except %)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Gross written premiums
|
$
|
7,180
|
$
|
4,086
|
$
|
1,133
|
$
|
12,399
|
||||||||
|
Gross written premiums excluding third
|
||||||||||||||||
|
party captives
|
3,296
|
3,993
|
1,133
|
8,422
|
||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
3,040
|
3,565
|
961
|
7,566
|
||||||||||||
|
Net earned premiums
|
2,883
|
3,323
|
940
|
7,146
|
||||||||||||
|
Net investment income
|
449
|
565
|
58
|
1,072
|
||||||||||||
|
Core income
|
535
|
261
|
38
|
834
|
||||||||||||
|
Other performance metrics:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Loss ratio excluding catastrophes
|
||||||||||||||||
|
and development
|
59.9
|
%
|
60.6
|
%
|
60.1
|
%
|
60.2
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Effect of catastrophe impacts
|
4.3
|
10.7
|
7.1
|
7.7
|
||||||||||||
|
Effect of development-related items
|
(2.1
|
)
|
2.1
|
(0.3
|
)
|
0.1
|
||||||||||
|
Loss ratio
|
62.1
|
%
|
73.4
|
%
|
66.9
|
%
|
68.0
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Expense ratio
|
31.3
|
33.0
|
35.5
|
32.6
|
||||||||||||
|
Dividend ratio
|
0.
|
l
|
0.5
|
0.3
|
||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio
|
93.5
|
%
|
106.9
|
%
|
102.4
|
%
|
100.9
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Combined ratio excluding catastrophes
|
||||||||||||||||
|
and development
|
91.3
|
%
|
94.1
|
%
|
95.6
|
%
|
93.1
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Rate
|
12
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
14
|
%
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Renewal premium change
|
11
|
8
|
12
|
10
|
||||||||||||
|
Retention
|
86
|
84
|
73
|
83
|
||||||||||||
|
New business
|
$
|
389
|
$
|
761
|
$
|
245
|
$
|
1,395
|
||||||||
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
Specialty
|
Commercial
|
International
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except %)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Gross written premiums
|
$
|
6,900
|
$
|
3,693
|
$
|
1,111
|
$
|
11,704
|
||||||||
|
Gross written premiums excluding third
|
||||||||||||||||
|
p
arty captives
|
3,015
|
3,609
|
1,111
|
7,735
|
||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
2,848
|
3,315
|
971
|
7,134
|
||||||||||||
|
Net earned premiums
|
2,773
|
3,162
|
974
|
6,909
|
||||||||||||
|
Net investment income
|
556
|
654
|
63
|
1,273
|
||||||||||||
|
Core income
|
671
|
489
|
30
|
1,190
|
||||||||||||
|
Other performance metrics:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Loss ratio excluding catastrophes
|
||||||||||||||||
|
and development
|
60.3
|
%
|
61.7
|
%
|
60.9
|
%
|
61.0
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Effect of catastrophe impacts
|
0.5
|
4.9
|
1.1
|
2.6
|
||||||||||||
|
Effect of development-related items
|
(3.3
|
)
|
0.7
|
2.1
|
(0.7
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Loss ratio
|
57.5
|
%
|
67.3
|
%
|
64.1
|
%
|
62.9
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Expense ratio
|
32.5
|
32.9
|
37.7
|
33.5
|
||||||||||||
|
Dividend ratio
|
0.2
|
0.6
|
0.3
|
|||||||||||||
|
Combined ratio
|
90.2
|
%
|
100.8
|
%
|
101.8
|
%
|
96.7
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Combined ratio excluding catastrophes
|
||||||||||||||||
|
and development
|
93.0
|
%
|
95.2
|
%
|
98.6
|
%
|
94.8
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Rate
|
5
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Renewal premium change
|
8
|
6
|
7
|
6
|
||||||||||||
|
Retention
|
88
|
86
|
71
|
84
|
||||||||||||
|
New business
|
$
|
367
|
$
|
682
|
$
|
273
|
$
|
1,322
|
||||||||
2020 Compared with 2019
Total gross written premiums increased $695 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. Total net written premiums increased $432 million in 2020 as compared with 2019.
Gross written premiums, excluding third party captives, for Specialty increased $281 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 driven by strong rate and higher new business. Net written premiums for Specialty increased $192 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. The increase in net earned premiums in 2020 was consistent with the trend in net written premiums for Specialty.
Gross written premiums for Commercial increased $393 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 driven by strong rate and higher new business. Net written premiums for Commercial increased $250 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. The increase in net earned premiums in 2020 for Commercial was consistent with the trend in net written premiums partially offset by a reduction in estimated audit premiums as a result of the economic slowdown arising from COVID-19 and premium rate adjustments impacting certain general liability policies. For further information on the general liability premium rate adjustments see Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Gross written premiums for International increased $22 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 driven by growth in Europe and Canada partially offset by the impact of the strategic exit from certain Lloyd’s business classes. Net written premiums decreased $10 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. The decrease in net earned premiums in 2020 was consistent with the trend in net written premiums for International.
Core income decreased $356 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 primarily due to higher net catastrophe losses and lower net investment income. These results were partially offset by improved non-catastrophe current accident year underwriting results.
Net catastrophe losses were $550 million in 2020 as compared with $179 million in 2019. Net catastrophe losses in 2020 include $294 million primarily related to severe weather-related events, $195 million related to COVID-19 and $61 million related to civil unrest. Specialty net catastrophe losses of $125 million in 2020 included $109 million related to the COVID-19 pandemic and $16 million primarily related to severe weather-related events. Specialty net catastrophe losses were $15 million in 2019. Commercial net catastrophe losses of $358 million in 2020 included $252 million primarily related to severe weather-related events, $58 million related to civil unrest and $48 million related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Commercial net catastrophe losses were $154 million in 2019. International net catastrophe losses of $67 million in 2020 included $38 million related to the COVID-19 pandemic, $26 million primarily related to severe weather-related events and $3 million related to civil unrest. International net catastrophe losses were $10 million in 2019.
The COVID-19 catastrophe losses represent CNA’s best estimate of ultimate insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses, including defense costs, resulting from the pandemic, mitigating actions and the consequent economic crisis. The losses were substantially driven by healthcare professional liability with additional impacts from workers’ compensation, management liability, commercial property, trade credit and surety. Due to the timing and fluidity of the events related to COVID-19, emergence pattern of claims and long tail nature of certain exposures the losses are substantially classified as incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves. The COVID-19 catastrophe losses do not include the benefits of lower current accident year losses associated with lower loss frequency in certain lines of business as a result of shelter in place restrictions. Those benefits are modest and are partially offset by the impact of a reduction in the estimated audit premiums and an increase in the credit allowance for premium receivables resulting from depressed economic conditions.
Favorable net prior year loss reserve development of $20 million and $73 million was recorded in 2020 and 2019. In 2020 and 2019, Specialty recorded favorable net prior year loss reserve development of $61 million and $92 million, Commercial recorded unfavorable net prior year loss reserve development of $43 million as compared with favorable net prior year loss reserve development of $2 million and International recorded favorable net prior year loss reserve development of $2 million as compared with unfavorable net prior year loss reserve development of $21 million. Further information on net prior year loss reserve development is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Specialty’s combined ratio increased 3.3 points in 2020 as compared with 2019 primarily due to a 4.6 point increase in the loss ratio partially offset by a 1.2 point improvement in the expense ratio. The increase in the loss ratio was primarily due to higher net catastrophe losses, which were 4.3 points of the loss ratio in 2020, as compared with 0.5 points of the loss ratio in 2019. The improvement in the expense ratio was driven by lower underwriting expenses and higher net earned premiums.
Commercial’s combined ratio increased 6.1 points in 2020 as compared with 2019 due to an increase in the loss ratio. The increase in the loss ratio was driven by higher net catastrophe losses, which were 10.7 points of the loss ratio in 2020, as compared with 4.9 point of the loss ratio in 2019, and unfavorable net prior year loss reserve development in 2020. The expense ratio in 2020 was consistent with 2019 as higher acquisition expenses were offset by higher net earned premiums and lower underwriting expenses.
International’s combined ratio increased 0.6 points in 2020 as compared with 2019 due to a 2.8 point increase in the loss ratio, partially offset by a 2.2 point improvement in the expense ratio. The increase in the loss ratio was driven by higher net catastrophe losses, which were 7.1 points of the loss ratio in 2020, as compared with 1.1 points of the loss ratio in 2019, partially offset by favorable net prior year loss reserve development in the current year. The improvement in the expense ratio was driven by lower acquisition and underwriting expenses.
Other Insurance Operations
The following table summarizes the results of CNA’s Other Insurance Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
|
Years Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Net earned premiums
|
$
|
504
|
$
|
520
|
||||
|
Net investment income
|
863
|
845
|
||||||
|
Core loss
|
(99
|
)
|
(211
|
)
|
||||
2020 Compared with 2019
Core loss improved $112 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. Core loss in 2020 included a $59 million charge related to the recognition of an active life reserve premium deficiency for long term care policies primarily driven by actions taken on discount rate assumptions. The normative risk free rate (the projection of the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate in the long term) was lowered by 100 basis points to 2.75% and the time period to grade up to the normative rate was extended from 6 years to 10 years. Core loss in 2020 also included a $36 million charge related to an increase in the structured settlement claim reserves and a $30 million benefit related to a reduction in long term care claim reserves, both resulting from the annual claim reserve reviews in the third quarter of 2020. Core loss in 2019 included a $170 million charge related to the recognition of an active life reserve premium deficiency and a $44 million benefit related to a reduction in long term care claim reserves resulting from the annual claim reserve reviews in the third quarter of 2019. Excluding the impacts of the GPV and claim reserve reviews, core results in 2020 were favorable, driven by better than expected morbidity in the long term care business and higher net investment income. The increase in net investment income was driven by the allocation of a portion of limited partnership income to Other Insurance Operations beginning in the fourth quarter of 2020. Further, during 2020, relative to expectations, CNA experienced lower new claim frequency, higher claim terminations and more favorable claim severity amid the effects of COVID-19. Given the uncertainty of these trends, CNA increased its IBNR reserves in anticipation of increased claim activity as the COVID-19 pandemic abates.
Non-GAAP Reconciliation of Core Income to Net Income
The following table reconciles core income to net income attributable to Loews Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Core income (loss):
|
||||||||
|
Property & Casualty Operations
|
$
|
834
|
$
|
1,190
|
||||
|
Other Insurance Operations
|
(99
|
)
|
(211
|
)
|
||||
|
Total core income
|
735
|
979
|
||||||
|
Investment gains (losses)
|
(30
|
)
|
37
|
|||||
|
Consolidating adjustments including noncontrolling interests
|
(87
|
)
|
(122
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
618
|
$
|
894
|
||||
Overview
Boardwalk Pipelines operates in the midstream portion of the natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) industry, providing transportation and storage for those commodities. Boardwalk Pipelines is not in the business of buying and selling natural gas and NGLs other than for system management purposes, but changes in natural gas and NGLs prices may impact the volumes of natural gas or NGLs transported and stored by customers on its systems. Due to the capital-intensive nature of its business, Boardwalk Pipelines’ operating costs and expenses typically do not vary significantly based upon the amount of products transported, with the exception of fuel consumed at its compressor stations and not included in a fuel tracker.
Current Events
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 significantly impacted the world and the United States. An excess supply of energy products also led to disruptions in the energy sector and volatility in energy prices early in 2020, with a partial recovery of prices and demand occurring in the latter half of 2020. Boardwalk Pipelines’ operations are considered essential critical infrastructure under current Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency guidelines, which allowed Boardwalk Pipelines to remain open during the pandemic. As a result, the impacts from COVID-19 and the volatile energy prices have not been significant to Boardwalk Pipelines’ business, though some of its customers have been and continue to be directly impacted by COVID-19 and the volatility in commodity prices. In 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines transported approximately 3.2 Tcf of natural gas, or an 8% increase from 2019.
Firm Agreements
A substantial portion of Boardwalk Pipelines’ transportation and storage capacity is contracted for under firm agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately 90% of Boardwalk Pipelines’ revenues were derived from capacity reservation fees under firm contracts. The table below shows a rollforward of operating revenues under committed firm agreements in place as of December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020, including agreements for transportation, storage and other services, over the remaining term of those agreements:
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||
|
Total projected operating revenues under committed firm agreements as of December 31, 2019
|
$
|
9,329
|
||
|
Adjustments for:
|
||||
|
Actual revenues recognized from firm agreements in 2020
(a)
|
(1,155
|
)
|
||
|
Firm agreements entered into in 2020
|
1,276
|
|||
|
Total projected operating revenues under committed firm agreements as of December 31, 2020
|
$
|
9,450
|
||
| (a) |
Reflects an increase of $91 million in Boardwalk Pipelines’ actual 2020 revenues recognized from fixed fees under firm agreements as compared with its expected 2020 revenues from fixed fees under firm agreements, including agreements for transportation, storage and other services as of December 31, 2019, primarily due to an increase from contract renewals that occurred in 2020.
|
During 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines entered into approximately $1.3 billion of new firm agreements, of which approximately 55% were from new growth projects executed in 2020, but will not be placed into commercial service until 2024 or later years. As of December 31, 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines’ top ten customers holding firm capacity under firm agreements comprised approximately 40% of its total projected operating revenues. Additionally, the credit profile associated with Boardwalk Pipelines’ customers comprising the total projected operating revenues under firm agreements as of December 31, 2020 was 75% rated as investment grade, 4% rated as non-investment grade and 21% not rated.
Contract Renewals
Each year a portion of Boardwalk Pipelines’ firm transportation and storage agreements expire. The rates Boardwalk Pipelines is able to charge customers are heavily influenced by market trends (both short and longer term), including the available supply, geographical location of natural gas production, the competition between producing basins, competition with other pipelines for supply and markets, the demand for gas by end-users such as power plants, petrochemical facilities and LNG export facilities and the price differentials between the gas supplies and the market demand for the gas (basis differentials). Boardwalk Pipelines’ storage rates are additionally impacted by natural gas price differentials between time periods, such as winter to summer (time period price spreads), and the volatility in time period price spreads. Demand for firm service is primarily based on market conditions which can vary across Boardwalk Pipelines’ pipeline systems. While Boardwalk Pipelines has not seen a decrease in the demand for its transportation services as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic or the volatility in energy prices during 2020, if these conditions were to remain for an extended period of time or worsen, Boardwalk Pipelines could see a decline in the demand for its services. Boardwalk Pipelines focuses its marketing efforts on enhancing the value of the capacity that is up for renewal and works with customers to match gas supplies from various basins to new and existing customers and markets, including aggregating supplies at key locations along its pipelines to provide end-use customers with attractive and diverse supply options. If the market perceives the value of Boardwalk Pipelines’ available capacity to be lower than its long term view of the capacity, Boardwalk Pipelines may seek to shorten contract terms until market perception improves.
Over the past several years, as a result of market conditions, Boardwalk Pipelines has renewed some expiring contracts at lower rates or for shorter terms than in the past. In addition to normal contract expirations, in the 2018 to 2020 timeframe, transportation agreements associated with its significant pipeline expansion projects that were placed into service in the 2007-2009 timeframe, have expired. A substantial portion of the capacity associated with the pipeline expansion projects was recontracted, usually at lower rates or lower volumes, which has negatively impacted Boardwalk Pipelines’ operating revenues. The last of the contract expirations associated with the 2007-2009 pipeline expansion projects have occurred and the associated impacts on operating revenues have been and will continue to be realized. Historically, Boardwalk Pipelines had delivered the majority of production volumes from these pipeline expansion projects to other pipelines. Over the past several years, Boardwalk Pipelines has focused on diversifying its deliveries to end-use markets through utilizing available capacity from contract expirations and the capacity created from its growth projects. Boardwalk Pipelines has diversified deliveries such that almost 75% of Boardwalk Pipelines’ projected future firm reservation revenues, from firm agreements in place as of December 31, 2020, are for deliveries to end-use customers.
Pipeline System Maintenance
Boardwalk Pipelines incurs substantial costs for ongoing maintenance of its pipeline systems and related facilities, including those incurred for pipeline integrity management activities, equipment overhauls, general upkeep and repairs. These costs are not dependent on the amount of revenues earned from its transportation services. PHMSA has developed regulations that require transportation pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs to comprehensively evaluate certain areas along pipelines and take additional measures to protect pipeline segments located in highly populated areas. These regulations have resulted in an overall increase in Boardwalk Pipelines’ ongoing maintenance costs, including maintenance capital and maintenance expense. In 2019, PHMSA issued the first part of its gas Mega Rule, which became effective on July 1, 2020. This regulation imposed numerous requirements, including MAOP reconfirmation through re-verification of all historical records for pipelines in service, which re-certification process may require natural gas pipelines installed before 1970 (previously excluded from certain pressure testing obligations) to be pressure tested, the periodic assessment of additional pipeline mileage outside of HCAs (in MCAs as well as Class 3 and Class 4 areas), the reporting of exceedances of MAOP and the consideration of seismicity as a risk factor in integrity management. The remaining rulemakings comprising the gas Mega Rule have not been published yet and Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict when they will be finalized, however, they are expected to include revised pipeline repair criteria as well as more stringent corrosion control requirements. It is expected that these new rules will cause Boardwalk Pipelines to incur increased capital and operating costs, experience operational delays and result in potential adverse impacts to its ability to reliably serve its customers as described under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Report.
Maintenance costs may be capitalized or expensed, depending on the nature of the activities. For any given reporting period, the mix of projects that Boardwalk Pipelines undertakes will affect the amounts we record as property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets or recognize as expenses, which impacts earnings. In 2021, Boardwalk Pipelines expects to spend approximately $370 million to maintain its pipeline systems, of which approximately $150 million is expected to be maintenance capital. In 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines spent $361 million to maintain its pipeline systems, of which $149 million was recorded as maintenance capital.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes the results of operations for Boardwalk Pipelines for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 as presented in Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||
|
Operating revenues and other
|
$
|
1,302
|
$
|
1,300
|
||||
|
Total
|
1,302
|
1,300
|
||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Operating and other
|
855
|
840
|
||||||
|
Interest
|
170
|
179
|
||||||
|
Total
|
1,025
|
1,019
|
||||||
|
Income before income tax
|
277
|
281
|
||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(71
|
)
|
(72
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
206
|
$
|
209
|
||||
2020 Compared with 2019
Total revenues increased $2 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. Including the effect of items in fuel and transportation expense and excluding net proceeds of approximately $34 million in 2020 and $26 million in 2019 as a result of drawing on letters of credit due to customer bankruptcies in 2020 and 2019, operating revenues decreased $11 million driven by contract expirations that were recontracted at overall lower average rates, partially offset by revenues from recently completed growth projects and higher storage and parking and lending revenues due to favorable market conditions.
Operating expenses increased $15 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. Excluding items offset with operating revenues, operating expenses increased $11 million, primarily due to an increased asset base from recently completed growth projects and the expiration of property tax abatements, partially offset by lower maintenance project spending and employee-related costs. Interest expense decreased $9 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 primarily due to lower average interest rates.
The following table summarizes the results of operations for Loews Hotels & Co for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 as presented in Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||
|
Operating revenue
|
$
|
167
|
$
|
578
|
||||
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
37
|
|||||||
|
Revenues related to reimbursable expenses
|
74
|
114
|
||||||
|
Total
|
278
|
692
|
||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Operating and other:
|
||||||||
|
Operating
|
273
|
493
|
||||||
|
Asset impairments
|
36
|
99
|
||||||
|
Reimbursable expenses
|
74
|
114
|
||||||
|
Depreciation
|
63
|
61
|
||||||
|
Equity (income) loss from joint ventures
|
73
|
(69
|
)
|
|||||
|
Interest
|
33
|
22
|
||||||
|
Total
|
552
|
720
|
||||||
|
Loss before income tax
|
(274
|
)
|
(28
|
)
|
||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
62
|
(3
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net loss attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
(212
|
)
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
||
2020 Compared with 2019
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to mitigate the spread of the virus, beginning in March of 2020, Loews Hotels & Co temporarily suspended operations at the majority of its owned and/or operated hotels. Since then, most hotels have resumed operations, but occupancy rates remain considerably lower than those from the prior year, or even occupancy rates prior to March of 2020. As such, Loews Hotels & Co has actively managed the operations of its hotel portfolio, in partnership with each hotel’s stakeholders, to minimize the financial loss at each property and accommodate available demand. Although Loews Hotels & Co has enacted significant measures to adjust the operating cost structure of each hotel during suspensions of operations, deferred most capital expenditures and reduced the operating costs of its management company, these measures could not offset the impact of significant lost revenues. Loews Hotels & Co has therefore incurred significant operating losses since the start of the pandemic.
The resumption of operations for the hotels that currently have suspended operations, the potential for hotels that are operational to suspend operations, as well as occupancy levels for hotels that are operational will depend on numerous factors, many of which are outside Loews Hotels & Co’s control including government capacity restrictions, travel restrictions and the duration and scope of the COVID-19 pandemic. While the duration and period to period severity of the COVID-19 outbreak and related financial impact cannot be estimated at this time, Loews Hotels & Co’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows were materially adversely affected during 2020, and will continue to be materially adversely impacted into 2021. In addition, once the COVID-19 outbreak is mitigated or contained, whenever that may be, historical travel patterns, both domestic and international, may continue to be disrupted either on a temporary basis or with longer term effects. These factors have contributed to impairment charges in 2020, and may lead to additional impairment charges in future periods.
Reduced occupancy and average daily rates caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting mitigation efforts and operating cost reduction measures are the primary reasons for the decrease in operating revenues of $411 million and operating expenses of $220 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. Equity losses from joint ventures was $73 million in 2020 as compared to equity income of $69 million in 2019, also driven primarily by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Loews Hotels & Co considers events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount of its assets may not be recoverable. In 2020, Loews Hotels & Co recorded impairment charges of $36 million to reduce the carrying value of certain assets to their estimated fair value compared to impairment charges of $99 million in 2019.
Gain on sale of assets of $37 million in 2020 related to an owned hotel and an office building.
Interest expense for 2020 increased $11 million as compared with 2019 primarily due to the increase in aggregate debt balances and less capitalized interest related to hotel development projects.
Corporate operations consist primarily of investment income at the Parent Company, operating results of Altium Packaging, Parent Company interest expense and other Parent Company administrative costs. Investment income includes earnings on cash and short term investments held at the Parent Company to meet current and future liquidity needs, as well as results of limited partnership investments and the trading portfolio held at the Parent Company.
The following table summarizes the results of operations for Corporate for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 as presented in Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||
|
Net investment income
|
$
|
59
|
$
|
230
|
||||
|
Investment loss
|
(1,211
|
)
|
||||||
|
Operating revenues and other
|
1,023
|
933
|
||||||
|
Total
|
(129
|
)
|
1,163
|
|||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Operating and other
|
1,098
|
1,004
|
||||||
|
Interest
|
127
|
115
|
||||||
|
Total
|
1,225
|
1,119
|
||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
(1,354
|
)
|
44
|
|||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
287
|
(9
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
(1,067
|
)
|
$
|
35
|
|||
2020 Compared with 2019
Net investment income for the Parent Company decreased $171 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 as a result of the significant decline in the performance of equity based and short term investments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related containment measures.
Investment loss of $1.2 billion ($957 million after tax) for the year ended December 31, 2020 was due to the loss recognized upon deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore as a result of its Chapter 11 Filing.
Operating revenues and other include Altium Packaging revenues of $1,022 million and $932 million for 2020 and 2019. The increase of $90 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 reflects an increase of $63 million related to the full year impact of acquisitions in 2019, an acquisition in November of 2020, higher volumes and higher year-over-year resin prices. Altium Packaging’s contracts with its customers provide for price adjustments for changes in resin prices on a prospective basis. Due to fluctuations in resin prices, over time resin raw material costs are generally offset by the change in revenues, so that Altium Packaging’s gross margins return to the same level as prior to the change in prices.
Operating and other expenses include Altium Packaging operating expenses of $992 million and $913 million for 2020 and 2019, which include depreciation and amortization expense. The increase in operating expenses of $79 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 is primarily due to $56 million for the full year impact of acquisitions in 2019 and an acquisition in November of 2020, higher depreciation and amortization expenses and the increase in resin prices.
Corporate Operating and other expenses were $106 million and $91 million for 2020 and 2019. The increases of $15 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 are primarily due to legal and other corporate overhead expenses.
Interest expenses increased $12 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 due to the issuance in May of 2020 of the Parent Company’s $500 million aggregate principal amount of 3.2% senior notes due May 15, 2030 and incremental borrowings by Altium Packaging to fund its 2019 acquisitions.
Contract drilling revenues were $287 million and $935 million for 2020 and 2019. Contract drilling expenses were $254 million and $793 million for 2020 and 2019. Results for 2020 included in our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect only the period through the April 26, 2020 deconsolidation. Operating and other expenses for 2020 include an aggregate asset impairment charge of $774 million ($408 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) recognized in the first quarter of 2020.
Parent Company cash and investments, net of receivables and payables, totaled $3.5 billion at December 31, 2020 as compared to $3.3 billion at December 31, 2019. In 2020, we received $947 million in dividends from our subsidiaries, including a special dividend from CNA of $485 million. Cash outflows included the payment of $923 million to fund treasury stock purchases, $70 million of cash dividends to our shareholders, $151 million of cash contributions to Loews Hotels & Co and $19 million to purchase common shares of CNA. On February 3, 2021, we received a $199 million dividend from Altium Packaging. In March of 2021, we will receive dividends of $275 million from CNA. As a holding company we depend on dividends from our subsidiaries and returns on our investment portfolio to fund our obligations. We also have an effective Registration Statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) registering the future sale of an unlimited amount of our debt and equity securities from time to time. We are not responsible for the liabilities and obligations of our subsidiaries and there are no Parent Company guarantees.
In May of 2020, we completed a public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of 3.2% senior notes due May 15, 2030. The proceeds of this offering are available for general corporate purposes.
Depending on market and other conditions, we may purchase our shares and shares of our subsidiaries outstanding common stock in the open market or otherwise. In 2020, we purchased 22.0 million shares of Loews Corporation common stock and 564,430 shares of CNA common stock. As of February 5, 2021, we had purchased an additional 2.2 million shares of Loews Corporation common stock in 2021 at an aggregate cost of $100 million. As of February 5, 2021, there were 267,046,558 shares of Loews Corporation common stock outstanding.
Loews Corporation has a corporate credit and senior debt rating of A with a stable outlook from S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”), a senior debt rating of A3 with a stable outlook from Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and a senior debt rating of A with a stable outlook from Fitch Ratings Inc. (“Fitch”).
Future uses of our cash may include investing in our subsidiaries, new acquisitions, dividends and/or repurchases of our and our subsidiaries’ outstanding common stock. The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many factors, including our earnings, financial condition and business needs.
CNA’s cash provided by operating activities was $1.8 billion in 2020 and $1.1 billion in 2019. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by an increase in premiums collected, lower net claim payments and lower income taxes paid, partially offset by a lower level of distributions from limited partnerships.
CNA paid dividends of $3.48 per share on its common stock, including a special dividend of $2.00 per share in 2020. On February 5, 2021, CNA’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share and a special dividend of $0.75 per share payable March 11, 2021 to shareholders of record on February 22, 2021. CNA’s declaration and payment of future dividends is at the discretion of its Board of Directors and will depend on many factors, including CNA’s earnings, financial condition, business needs and regulatory constraints. The payment of dividends by CNA’s insurance subsidiaries without prior approval of the insurance department of each subsidiary’s domiciliary jurisdiction is limited by formula. Dividends in excess of these amounts are subject to prior approval by the respective state insurance departments.
In August of 2020, CNA completed a public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.1% senior notes due August 15, 2030 and used the net proceeds to redeem the entire $400 million outstanding aggregate principal balance of its 5.8% senior notes due August 15, 2021 and for general corporate purposes. CNA has an effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC under which it may publicly issue debt, equity or hybrid securities from time to time.
On February 5, 2021, in connection with the closing of the retroactive reinsurance transaction with Cavello, CNA transferred approximately $630 million of cash into a collateral trust account as security for Cavello’s obligations under the terms of the agreement. See Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for further information on the retroactive reinsurance transaction with Cavello.
Dividends from Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”), a subsidiary of CNA, are subject to the insurance holding company laws of the State of Illinois, the domiciliary state of CCC. Under these laws, ordinary dividends, or dividends that do not require prior approval by the Illinois Department of Insurance (the “Department”), are determined based on the greater of the prior year’s statutory net income or 10% of statutory surplus as of the end of the prior year, as well as the timing and amount of dividends paid in the preceding 12 months. Additionally, ordinary dividends may only be paid from earned surplus, which is calculated by removing unrealized gains from unassigned surplus. As of December 31, 2020, CCC was in a positive earned surplus position. The maximum allowable dividend CCC could pay during 2021 that would not be subject to the Department’s prior approval is $1,070 million, less dividends paid during the preceding twelve months measured at that point in time. CCC paid dividends of $975 million in 2020. The actual level of dividends paid in any year is determined after an assessment of available dividend capacity, holding company liquidity and cash needs as well as the impact the dividends will have on the statutory surplus of the applicable insurance company.
CNA has a financial strength rating of A and senior debt rating of bbb+ from A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”), a financial strength rating of A2 and senior debt rating of Baa2 from Moody’s, a financial strength rating of A+ and senior debt rating of A- from S&P and financial strength rating of A+ and senior debt rating of BBB+ from Fitch. A.M. Best, Moody’s, S&P and Fitch maintain stable outlooks across CNA’s financial strength and senior debt credit ratings.
Boardwalk Pipelines’ cash provided by operating activities decreased $21 million in 2020 compared to 2019, primarily due to the change in net income and the timing of receivables.
For 2020 and 2019, Boardwalk Pipelines’ capital expenditures were $438 million and $429 million, consisting primarily of a combination of growth and maintenance capital. Boardwalk Pipelines expects total capital expenditures to be approximately $340 million in 2021, including approximately $150 million for maintenance capital and $190 million related to growth projects.
Boardwalk Pipelines anticipates that its existing capital resources, including its revolving credit facility and cash flows from operating activities, will be adequate to fund its operations and capital expenditures for 2021. Boardwalk Pipelines may seek to access the debt markets to fund some or all capital expenditures for growth projects, acquisitions or for general corporate purposes. During 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines utilized the remaining capacity under its effective shelf registration statement, and it plans to file with the SEC and expects to have declared effective in the first quarter of 2021 a $1.0 billion shelf registration statement under which it may publicly issue debt securities, warrants or rights from time to time.
In November of 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines paid a distribution of $102 million to the Company.
Boardwalk Pipelines has a senior debt rating of BBB- with a stable outlook from S&P, a senior debt rating of Baa3 with a stable outlook from Moody’s and a senior debt rating of BBB- with a positive outlook from Fitch.
Certain of the hotels wholly or partially owned by Loews Hotels & Co are financed by debt facilities, with a number of different lenders. Each of the loan agreements underlying these facilities contain a variety of financial and operational covenants. As a result of the impacts of COVID-19, Loews Hotels & Co has proactively requested certain lenders, where applicable, to (1) temporarily waive certain covenants to avoid an event of default and/or further restriction of the hotel’s cash balances through the establishment of lockboxes and other measures; (2) temporarily allow funds previously restricted directly or indirectly under the hotel’s underlying loan agreement for the renewal, replacement and addition of building improvements, furniture and fixtures to be used instead for hotel operations and maintenance; and/or (3) defer certain interest and/or principal payments while the hotels operations are temporarily suspended or significantly impacted by a decline in occupancy. Loews Hotels & Co also continues to work with lenders on loans that are being reviewed for extension. These discussions with lenders are ongoing and may require Loews Hotels & Co to make principal paydowns or provide guaranties of a subsidiary’s debt to otherwise avoid an event of default. Through the date of this Report, Loews Hotels & Co is not in default on any of its loans.
Additionally, due to temporary suspension of operations and lost revenues in certain joint venture entities, Loews Hotels & Co has received capital call notices in accordance with the underlying joint venture agreements to support the properties’ operations. Through December 31, 2020, Loews Hotels & Co funded approximately $51 million to these joint ventures in 2020.
In 2020 Loews Hotels & Co received capital contributions of $151 million from Loews Corporation to fund working capital and growth projects. Due to the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to the travel and hospitality industry, Loews Hotels & Co will require additional funding from Loews Corporation during 2021. The amount needed will depend on numerous factors, including how quickly properties are able to return to sustainable operating levels.
On February 3, 2021, Altium Packaging issued a $1.05 billion seven-year secured term loan. The term loan is a variable rate facility which bears interest at a floating rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin of 2.75%, subject to a 0.5% LIBOR floor. The proceeds were used to pay the outstanding principal balances of its variable rate term loans and lending facility and pay a dividend of $200 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2020 and 2019, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries had any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Our contractual payment obligations are as follows:
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Less than
|
More than
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Total
|
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Debt (a)
|
$
|
13,053
|
$
|
458
|
$
|
2,512
|
$
|
2,614
|
$
|
7,469
|
||||||||||
|
Operating leases
|
666
|
89
|
152
|
108
|
317
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Claim and claim adjustment expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
reserves (b)
|
23,709
|
5,983
|
6,205
|
3,096
|
8,425
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Future policy benefit reserves (c)
|
25,394
|
(329
|
)
|
111
|
865
|
24,747
|
||||||||||||||
|
Purchase and other obligations
|
215
|
206
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
63,037
|
$
|
6,407
|
$
|
8,984
|
$
|
6,685
|
$
|
40,961
|
||||||||||
| (a) |
Includes estimated future interest payments.
|
| (b) |
The claim and claim adjustment expense reserves reflected above are not discounted and represent CNA’s estimate of the amount and timing of the ultimate settlement and administration of gross claims based on its assessment of facts and circumstances known as of December 31, 2020. See the Insurance Reserves section of this MD&A for further information.
|
| (c) |
The future policy benefit reserves reflected above are not discounted and represent CNA’s estimate of the ultimate amount and timing of the settlement of benefits net of expected premiums, and are based on its assessment of facts and circumstances known as of December 31, 2020. Additional information on future policy benefit reserves is included in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
|
Further information on our commitments, contingencies and guarantees is provided in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Investment activities of our non-insurance subsidiaries primarily consist of investments in fixed income securities, including short term investments. The Parent Company portfolio also includes equity securities, including short sales and derivative instruments, and investments in limited partnerships. These types of investments generally have greater volatility, less liquidity and greater risk than fixed income investments and are included within Results of Operations – Corporate.
The Parent Company enters into short sales and invests in certain derivative instruments that are used for asset and liability management activities, income enhancements to its portfolio management strategy and to benefit from anticipated future movements in the underlying markets. If such movements do not occur as anticipated, then significant losses may occur. Monitoring procedures include senior management review of daily reports of existing positions and valuation fluctuations to seek to ensure that open positions are consistent with the portfolio strategy.
Credit exposure associated with non-performance by counterparties to derivative instruments is generally limited to the uncollateralized change in fair value of the derivative instruments recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We mitigate the risk of non-performance by monitoring the creditworthiness of counterparties and diversifying derivatives by using multiple counterparties. We occasionally require collateral from derivative investment counterparties depending on the amount of the exposure and the credit rating of the counterparty.
Insurance
CNA maintains a large portfolio of fixed maturity and equity securities, including large amounts of corporate and government issued debt securities, residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities and investments in limited partnerships which pursue a variety of long and short investment strategies across a broad array of asset classes. CNA’s investment portfolio supports its obligation to pay future insurance claims and provides investment returns which are an important part of CNA’s overall profitability.
Net Investment Income
The significant components of CNA’s net investment income are presented in the following table. Fixed income securities, as presented, include both fixed maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock.
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Fixed income securities:
|
||||||||
|
Taxable fixed income securities
|
$
|
1,451
|
$
|
1,538
|
||||
|
Tax-exempt fixed income securities
|
319
|
318
|
||||||
|
Total fixed income securities
|
1,770
|
1,856
|
||||||
|
Limited partnership investments
|
121
|
180
|
||||||
|
Common stock
|
23
|
46
|
||||||
|
Other, net of investment expense
|
21
|
36
|
||||||
|
Net investment income
|
$
|
1,935
|
$
|
2,118
|
||||
|
Effective income yield for the fixed income securities
|
||||||||
|
portfolio
|
4.5
|
%
|
4.8
|
%
|
||||
|
Limited partnership and common stock return
|
8.3
|
%
|
11.7
|
%
|
||||
CNA’s net investment income decreased $183 million in 2020 as compared with 2019 driven by lower yields in the fixed income portfolio and lower limited partnership and common stock returns.
Investment Gains (Losses)
The components of CNA’s investment gains (losses) are presented in the following table:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Investment gains (losses):
|
||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
40
|
13
|
||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
31
|
(11
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total fixed maturity securities
|
-
|
(6
|
)
|
|||||
|
Non-redeemable preferred stock
|
(3
|
)
|
66
|
|||||
|
Short term and other
|
(32
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
||||
|
Total investment gains (losses)
|
(35
|
)
|
49
|
|||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
5
|
(12
|
)
|
|||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
3
|
(4
|
)
|
|||||
|
Investment gains (losses)
attributable to
Loews Corporation
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
$
|
33
|
|||
CNA’s investment gains (losses) decreased $84 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. The decrease was driven by higher impairment losses and the unfavorable change in fair value of non-redeemable preferred stock partially offset by higher net realized investment gains on sales of fixed maturity securities.
Further information on CNA’s investment gains and losses is set forth in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Portfolio Quality
The following table presents the estimated fair value and net unrealized gains (losses) of CNA’s fixed maturity securities by rating distribution:
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Estimated
|
Gains
|
Estimated
|
Gains
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fair Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair Value
|
(Losses)
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Government, Government agencies and
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
$
|
3,672
|
$
|
117
|
$
|
4,136
|
$
|
95
|
||||||||
|
AAA
|
3,627
|
454
|
3,254
|
349
|
||||||||||||
|
AA
|
7,159
|
1,012
|
6,663
|
801
|
||||||||||||
|
A
|
9,543
|
1,390
|
9,062
|
1,051
|
||||||||||||
|
BBB
|
18,007
|
2,596
|
16,839
|
1,684
|
||||||||||||
|
Non-investment grade
|
2,623
|
149
|
2,253
|
101
|
||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
44,631
|
$
|
5,718
|
$
|
42,207
|
$
|
4,081
|
||||||||
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, 1% of CNA’s fixed maturity portfolio was rated internally. AAA rated securities included $1.8 billion and $1.5 billion of pre-funded municipal bonds as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The following table presents CNA’s available-for-sale fixed maturity securities in a gross unrealized loss position by ratings distribution:
|
|
Gross
|
|||||||
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
U.S. Government, Government agencies and
|
||||||||
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
$
|
115
|
$
|
3
|
||||
|
AAA
|
36
|
1
|
||||||
|
AA
|
163
|
7
|
||||||
|
A
|
561
|
14
|
||||||
|
BBB
|
520
|
28
|
||||||
|
Non-investment grade
|
335
|
24
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,730
|
$
|
77
|
||||
The following table presents the maturity profile for these available-for-sale fixed maturity securities. Securities not due to mature on a single date are allocated based on weighted average life:
|
|
Gross
|
|||||||
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Due in one year or less
|
$
|
161
|
$
|
9
|
||||
|
Due after one year through five years
|
676
|
24
|
||||||
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
653
|
36
|
||||||
|
Due after ten years
|
240
|
8
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,730
|
$
|
77
|
||||
Duration
A primary objective in the management of CNA’s investment portfolio is to optimize return relative to the corresponding liabilities and respective liquidity needs. CNA’s views on the current interest rate environment, tax regulations, asset class valuations, specific security issuer and broader industry segment conditions as well as domestic and global economic conditions, are some of the factors that enter into an investment decision. CNA also continually monitors exposure to issuers of securities held and broader industry sector exposures and may from time to time adjust such exposures based on its views of a specific issuer or industry sector.
A further consideration in the management of CNA’s investment portfolio is the characteristics of the corresponding liabilities and the ability to align the duration of the portfolio to those liabilities and to meet future liquidity needs, minimize interest rate risk and maintain a level of income sufficient to support the underlying insurance liabilities. For portfolios where future liability cash flows are determinable and typically long term in nature, CNA segregates investments for asset/liability management purposes. The segregated investments support the long term care and structured settlement liabilities in Other Insurance Operations.
The effective durations of CNA’s fixed income securities and short term investments are presented in the following table. Amounts presented are net of payable and receivable amounts for securities purchased and sold, but not yet settled.
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
December 31, 2019
|
|||||||
|
Effective
|
Effective
|
||||||||
|
Estimated
|
Duration
|
Estimated
|
Duration
|
||||||
|
Fair Value
|
(Years)
|
Fair Value
|
(Years)
|
||||||
|
(In millions of dollars)
|
|||||||||
|
Investments supporting Other Insurance
|
|||||||||
|
Operations
|
$
|
18,518
|
9.2
|
$
|
18,015
|
8.9
|
|||
|
Other investments
|
28,839
|
4.5
|
26,813
|
4.1
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
47,357
|
6.3
|
$
|
44,828
|
6.0
|
|||
CNA’s investment portfolio is periodically analyzed for changes in duration and related price risk. Certain securities have duration characteristics that are variable based on market interest rates, credit spreads and other factors that may drive variability in the amount and timing of cash flows. Additionally, CNA periodically reviews the sensitivity of the portfolio to the level of foreign exchange rates and other factors that contribute to market price changes. A summary of these risks and specific analysis on changes is included in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk included under Item 7A.
Short Term Investments
The carrying value of the components of CNA’s Short term investments are presented in the following table:
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Short term investments:
|
||||||||
|
Commercial paper
|
$
|
1,181
|
||||||
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
$
|
1,702
|
364
|
|||||
|
Other
|
205
|
316
|
||||||
|
Total short term investments
|
$
|
1,907
|
$
|
1,861
|
||||
During 2020, CNA shifted its commercial paper holdings to U.S. Treasury securities.
In addition to short term investments, CNA held $419 million and $242 million of cash as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The level of claim reserves CNA maintains represents its best estimate, as of a particular point in time, of what the ultimate settlement and administration of claims will cost based on CNA’s assessment of facts and circumstances known at that time. Reserves are not an exact calculation of liability but instead are complex estimates that CNA derives, generally utilizing a variety of actuarial reserve estimation techniques, from numerous assumptions and expectations about future events, both internal and external, many of which are highly uncertain. As noted below, CNA reviews its reserves for each segment of its business periodically, and any such review could result in the need to increase reserves in amounts which could be material and could adversely affect our results of operations and equity and CNA’s financial condition, business and insurer financial strength and corporate debt ratings. Further information on reserves is provided in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Property and Casualty Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
CNA maintains loss reserves to cover its estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claim and claim adjustment expenses, including the estimated cost of the claims adjudication process, for claims that have been reported but not yet settled (case reserves) and claims that have been incurred but not reported (“IBNR”). IBNR includes a provision for development on known cases as well as a provision for late reported incurred claims. Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are reflected as liabilities and are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the heading “Insurance Reserves.” Adjustments to prior year reserve estimates, if necessary, are reflected in results of operations in the period that the need for such adjustments is determined. The carried case and IBNR reserves as of each balance sheet date are provided in the discussion that follows and in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
There is a risk that CNA’s recorded reserves are insufficient to cover its estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claims and claim adjustment expenses. Given the unprecedented nature of the event, a particularly high level of uncertainty exists as to the potential impact on insurance losses related to the COVID-19 pandemic, mitigating actions and consequent economic crisis. Unforeseen emerging or potential claims and coverage issues are also difficult to predict and could materially adversely affect the adequacy of CNA’s claim and claim adjustment expense reserves and could lead to future reserve additions.
In addition, CNA’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries also have actual and potential exposures related to A&EP claims, which could result in material losses. To mitigate the risks posed by CNA’s exposure to A&EP claims and claim adjustment expenses, CNA completed a transaction with National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), under which substantially all of CNA’s legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO effective January 1, 2010. See Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for further discussion about the transaction with NICO, its impact on CNA’s results of operations, the deferred retroactive reinsurance gain and the amount of remaining reinsurance limit.
Establishing Property & Casualty Reserve Estimates
In developing claim and claim adjustment expense (“loss” or “losses”) reserve estimates, CNA’s actuaries perform detailed reserve analyses that are staggered throughout the year. The data is organized at a reserve group level. A reserve group can be a line of business covering a subset of insureds such as commercial automobile liability for small or middle market customers, or it can be a particular type of claim such as construction defect. Every reserve group is reviewed at least once during the year, but most are reviewed more frequently. The analyses generally review losses gross of ceded reinsurance and apply the ceded reinsurance terms to the gross estimates to establish estimates net of reinsurance. In addition to the detailed analyses, CNA reviews actual loss emergence for all products each quarter.
Most of CNA’s business can be characterized as long-tail. For long-tail business, it will generally be several years between the time the business is written and the time when all claims are settled. CNA’s long-tail exposures include commercial automobile liability, workers’ compensation, general liability, medical professional liability, other professional liability and management liability coverages, assumed reinsurance run-off and products liability. Short-tail exposures include property, commercial automobile physical damage, marine, surety and warranty. Property & Casualty Operations contain both long-tail and short-tail exposures. Other Insurance Operations contain long-tail exposures.
Various methods are used to project ultimate losses for both long-tail and short-tail exposures.
The paid development method estimates ultimate losses by reviewing paid loss patterns and applying them to accident or policy years with further expected changes in paid losses. Selection of the paid loss pattern may require consideration of several factors including the impact of inflation on claim costs, the rate at which claims professionals make claim payments and close claims, the impact of judicial decisions and legislative changes, the impact of underwriting changes, the impact of large claim payments and other factors. Claim cost inflation itself may require evaluation of changes in the cost of repairing or replacing property, changes in the cost of medical care, changes in the cost of wage replacement and the impact of judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors. Because this method assumes that losses are paid at a consistent rate, changes in any of these factors can affect the results. Since the method does not rely on case reserves, it is not directly influenced by changes in their adequacy.
For many reserve groups, paid loss data for recent periods may be too immature or erratic for accurate predictions. This situation often exists for long-tail exposures. In addition, changes in the factors described above may result in inconsistent payment patterns. Finally, estimating the paid loss pattern subsequent to the most mature point available in the data analyzed often involves considerable uncertainty for long-tail products such as workers’ compensation.
The incurred development method is similar to the paid development method, but it uses case incurred losses instead of paid losses. Since the method uses more data (case reserves in addition to paid losses) than the paid development method, the incurred development patterns may be less variable than paid patterns. However, selection of the incurred loss pattern typically requires analysis of all of the same factors described above. In addition, the inclusion of case reserves can lead to distortions if changes in case reserving practices have taken place, and the use of case incurred losses may not eliminate the issues associated with estimating the incurred loss pattern subsequent to the most mature point available.
The loss ratio method multiplies earned premiums by an expected loss ratio to produce ultimate loss estimates for each accident or policy year. This method may be useful for immature accident or policy periods or if loss development patterns are inconsistent, losses emerge very slowly or there is relatively little loss history from which to estimate future losses. The selection of the expected loss ratio typically requires analysis of loss ratios from earlier accident or policy years or pricing studies and analysis of inflationary trends, frequency trends, rate changes, underwriting changes and other applicable factors.
The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method using paid loss is a combination of the paid development method and the loss ratio method. This method normally determines expected loss ratios similar to the approach used to estimate the expected loss ratio for the loss ratio method and typically requires analysis of the same factors described above. This method assumes that future losses will develop at the expected loss ratio level. The percent of paid loss to ultimate loss implied from the paid development method is used to determine what percentage of ultimate loss is yet to be paid. The use of the pattern from the paid development method typically requires consideration of the same factors listed in the description of the paid development method. The estimate of losses yet to be paid is added to current paid losses to estimate the ultimate loss for each year. For long-tail lines, this method will react very slowly if actual ultimate loss ratios are different from expectations due to changes not accounted for by the expected loss ratio calculation.
The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method using incurred loss is similar to the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method using paid loss except that it uses case incurred losses. The use of case incurred losses instead of paid losses can result in development patterns that are less variable than paid patterns. However, the inclusion of case reserves can lead to distortions if changes in case reserving have taken place, and the method typically requires analysis of the same factors that need to be reviewed for the loss ratio and incurred development methods.
The frequency times severity method multiplies a projected number of ultimate claims by an estimated ultimate average loss for each accident or policy year to produce ultimate loss estimates. Since projections of the ultimate number of claims are often less variable than projections of ultimate loss, this method can provide more reliable results for reserve groups where loss development patterns are inconsistent or too variable to be relied on exclusively. In addition, this method can more directly account for changes in coverage that affect the number and size of claims. However, this method can be difficult to apply to situations where very large claims or a substantial number of unusual claims result in volatile average claim sizes. Projecting the ultimate number of claims may require analysis of several factors, including the rate at which policyholders report claims to CNA, the impact of judicial decisions, the impact of underwriting changes and other factors. Estimating the ultimate average loss may require analysis of the impact of large losses and claim cost trends based on changes in the cost of repairing or replacing property, changes in the cost of medical care, changes in the cost of wage replacement, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors.
Stochastic modeling produces a range of possible outcomes based on varying assumptions related to the particular reserve group being modeled. For some reserve groups, CNA uses models which rely on historical development patterns at an aggregate level, while other reserve groups are modeled using individual claim variability assumptions supplied by the claims department. In either case, multiple simulations using varying assumptions are run and the results are analyzed to produce a range of potential outcomes. The results will typically include a mean and percentiles of the possible reserve distribution which aid in the selection of a point estimate.
For many exposures, especially those that are considered long-tail, a particular accident or policy year may not have a sufficient volume of paid losses to produce a statistically reliable estimate of ultimate losses. In such a case, CNA’s actuaries typically assign more weight to the incurred development method than to the paid development method. As claims continue to settle and the volume of paid loss increases, the actuaries may assign additional weight to the paid development method. For most of CNA’s products, even the incurred losses for accident or policy years that are early in the claim settlement process will not be of sufficient volume to produce a reliable estimate of ultimate losses. In these cases, CNA may not assign much, if any, weight to the paid and incurred development methods. CNA may use the loss ratio, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and/or frequency times severity methods. For short-tail exposures, the paid and incurred development methods can often be relied on sooner primarily because CNA’s history includes a sufficient number of years to cover the entire period over which paid and incurred losses are expected to change. However, CNA may also use the loss ratio, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and/or frequency times severity methods for short-tail exposures.
For other more complex reserve groups where the above methods may not produce reliable indications, CNA uses additional methods tailored to the characteristics of the specific situation.
Periodic Reserve Reviews
The reserve analyses performed by CNA’s actuaries result in point estimates. Each quarter, the results of the detailed reserve reviews are summarized and discussed with CNA’s senior management to determine management’s best estimate of reserves. CNA’s senior management considers many factors in making this decision. CNA’s recorded reserves reflect its best estimate as of a particular point in time based upon known facts and circumstances, consideration of the factors cited above and its judgment. The carried reserves differ from the actuarial point estimate as discussed further below.
Currently, CNA’s recorded reserves are modestly higher than the actuarial point estimate. For Property & Casualty Operations, the difference between CNA’s reserves and the actuarial point estimate is primarily driven by uncertainty with respect to immature accident years, claim cost inflation, changes in claims handling, changes to the tort environment which may adversely affect claim costs and the effects from the economy. For CNA’s legacy A&EP liabilities, the difference between CNA’s reserves and the actuarial point estimate is primarily driven by the potential tail volatility of run-off exposures.
The key assumptions fundamental to the reserving process are often different for various reserve groups and accident or policy years. Some of these assumptions are explicit assumptions that are required of a particular method, but most of the assumptions are implicit and cannot be precisely quantified. An example of an explicit assumption is the pattern employed in the paid development method. However, the assumed pattern is itself based on several implicit assumptions such as the impact of inflation on medical costs and the rate at which claim professionals close claims. As a result, the effect on reserve estimates of a particular change in assumptions typically cannot be specifically quantified, and changes in these assumptions cannot be tracked over time.
CNA’s recorded reserves are management’s best estimate. In order to provide an indication of the variability associated with CNA’s net reserves, the following discussion provides a sensitivity analysis that shows the approximate estimated impact of variations in significant factors affecting CNA’s reserve estimates for particular types of business. These significant factors are the ones that CNA believes could most likely materially affect the reserves. This discussion covers the major types of business for which CNA believes a material deviation to its reserves is reasonably possible. There can be no assurance that actual experience will be consistent with the current assumptions or with the variation indicated by the discussion. In addition, there can be no assurance that other factors and assumptions will not have a material impact on CNA’s reserves.
The three areas for which CNA believes a significant deviation to its net reserves is reasonably possible are (i) professional liability, management liability and surety products (ii) workers’ compensation and (iii) general liability.
Professional liability, management liability and surety products include U.S. professional liability coverages provided to various professional firms, including architects, real estate agents, small and mid-sized accounting firms, law firms and other professional firms. They also include D&O, employment practices, fiduciary, fidelity and surety coverages and medical liability. The most significant factor affecting reserve estimates for these liability coverages is
claim severity. Claim severity is driven by the cost of medical care, the cost of wage replacement, legal fees, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors. Underwriting and claim handling decisions such as the classes of business written and individual claim settlement decisions can also affect claim severity. If the estimated claim severity increases by 9%, CNA estimates that net reserves would increase by approximately $400 million. If the estimated claim severity decreases by 3%, CNA estimates that net reserves would decrease by approximately $150 million. CNA’s net reserves for these products were approximately $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2020.
For workers’ compensation, since many years will pass from the time the business is written until all claim payments have been made, the most significant factor affecting workers’ compensation reserve estimate is claim cost inflation on claim payments. Workers’ compensation claim cost inflation is driven by the cost of medical care, the cost of wage replacement, expected claimant lifetimes, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors. If estimated workers’ compensation claim cost inflation increases by 100 basis points for the entire period over which claim payments will be made, CNA estimates that its net reserves would increase by approximately $350 million. If estimated workers’ compensation claim cost inflation decreases by 100 basis points for the entire period over which claim payments will be made, CNA estimates that its net reserves would decrease by approximately $350 million. Net reserves for workers’ compensation were approximately $3.9 billion as of December 31, 2020.
For general liability, the most significant factor affecting reserve estimates is claim severity. Claim severity is driven by changes in the cost of repairing or replacing property, the cost of medical care, the cost of wage replacement, judicial decisions, legislation and other factors. If the estimated claim severity for general liability increases by 6%, CNA estimates that its net reserves would increase by approximately $200 million. If the estimated claim severity for general liability decreases by 3%, CNA estimates that its net reserves would decrease by approximately $100 million. Net reserves for general liability were approximately $3.5 billion as of December 31, 2020.
Given the factors described above, it is not possible to quantify precisely the ultimate exposure represented by claims and related litigation. As a result, CNA regularly reviews the adequacy of its reserves and reassesses its reserve estimates as historical loss experience develops, additional claims are reported and settled and additional information becomes available in subsequent periods. In reviewing CNA’s reserve estimates, CNA makes adjustments in the period that the need for such adjustments is determined. These reviews have resulted in CNA’s identification of information and trends that have caused CNA to change its reserves in prior periods and could lead to CNA’s identification of a need for additional material increases or decreases in claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, which could materially affect our results of operations and equity and CNA’s financial condition, business and insurer financial strength and corporate debt ratings positively or negatively. See Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for additional information about reserve development.
The following table summarizes gross and net carried reserves for CNA’s Property & Casualty Operations:
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Gross Case Reserves
|
$
|
6,183
|
$
|
6,276
|
||||
|
Gross IBNR Reserves
|
10,697
|
9,494
|
||||||
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
16,880
|
$
|
15,770
|
||||
|
Net Case Reserves
|
$
|
5,544
|
$
|
5,645
|
||||
|
Net IBNR Reserves
|
9,380
|
8,508
|
||||||
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
14,924
|
$
|
14,153
|
||||
The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves for other insurance businesses in run-off, including CNA Re and A&EP:
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Gross Case Reserves
|
$
|
1,105
|
$
|
1,137
|
||||
|
Gross IBNR Reserves
|
978
|
1,097
|
||||||
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
2,083
|
$
|
2,234
|
||||
|
Net Case Reserves
|
$
|
88
|
$
|
92
|
||||
|
Net IBNR Reserves
|
74
|
83
|
||||||
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
162
|
$
|
175
|
||||
Life & Group Policyholder Reserves
CNA’s Life & Group business includes its run-off long term care business as well as structured settlement obligations not funded by annuities related to certain property and casualty claimants. Long term care policies provide benefits for nursing homes, assisted living facilities and home health care subject to various daily and lifetime caps. Generally, policyholders must continue to make periodic premium payments to keep the policy in force and CNA has the ability to increase policy premiums, subject to state regulatory approval.
CNA maintains both claim and claim adjustment expense reserves as well as future policy benefit reserves for policyholder benefits for its Life & Group business.
Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves consist of estimated reserves for long term care policyholders that are currently receiving benefits, including claims that have been incurred but are not yet reported. In developing the claim and claim adjustment expense reserve estimates for CNA’s long term care policies, its actuaries perform a detailed claim reserve review on an annual basis. The review analyzes the sufficiency of existing reserves for policyholders currently on claim and includes an evaluation of expected benefit utilization and claim duration. In addition, claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are also maintained for the structured settlement obligations. In developing the claim and claim adjustment expense reserve estimates for CNA’s structured settlement obligations, CNA’s actuaries monitor mortality experience on an annual basis. CNA’s recorded claim and claim adjustment expense reserves reflect CNA’s best estimate after incorporating the results of the most recent reviews. Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for long term care policies and structured settlement obligations are discounted as discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Future policy benefit reserves consist of the active life reserves related to CNA’s long term care policies for policyholders that are not currently receiving benefits and represent the present value of expected future benefit payments and expenses less expected future premium.
The determination of these reserves requires management to make estimates and assumptions about expected investment and policyholder experience over the life of the contract. Since many of these contracts may be in force for several decades, these assumptions are subject to significant estimation risk.
The actuarial assumptions that management believes are subject to the most variability are morbidity, persistency, discount rates and anticipated future premium rate increases. Morbidity is the frequency and severity of injury, illness, sickness and diseases contracted. Persistency is the percentage of policies remaining in force and can be affected by policy lapses, benefit reductions and death. Discount rates are influenced by the investment yield on assets supporting long term care reserves which is subject to interest rate and market volatility and may also be affected by changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Future premium rate increases are generally subject to regulatory approval, and therefore the exact timing and size of the approved rate increases are unknown. As a result of this variability, CNA’s long term care reserves may be subject to material increases if actual experience develops adversely to its expectations.
Annually, in the third quarter, CNA assesses the adequacy of its long term care future policy benefit reserves by performing a gross premium valuation (“GPV”) to determine if there is a premium deficiency. Under the GPV, management estimates required reserves using best estimate assumptions as of the date of the assessment without provisions for adverse deviation. The GPV required reserves are then compared to the existing recorded reserves. If the GPV required reserves are greater than the existing recorded reserves, the assumptions are unlocked and future
policy benefit reserves are increased to the greater amount. Any such increase is reflected in CNA’s results of operations in the period in which the need for such adjustment is determined. If the GPV required reserves are less than the existing recorded reserves, the assumptions remain locked in and no adjustment is required.
Periodically, CNA engages independent third parties to assess the appropriateness of its best estimate assumptions. The most recent third party assessment, performed in 2019, validated the assumption setting process and confirmed the best estimate assumptions appropriately reflected the experience data at that time.
The September 30, 2020 GPV indicated a premium deficiency of $74 million and future policy benefit reserves were increased accordingly. As a result, the long term care active life reserves carried as of September 30, 2020 represent CNA’s best estimate assumptions at that date with no margin for adverse deviation. A summary of the changes as a result of the 2020 GPV is presented in the table below:
|
(In millions)
|
||||
|
Long term care active life reserve - change in estimated reserve margin
|
||||
|
September 30, 2019 estimated margin
|
$
|
-
|
||
|
Changes in underlying discount rate assumptions
|
(609
|
)
|
||
|
Changes in underlying morbidity assumptions
|
51
|
|||
|
Changes in underlying persistency assumptions
|
152
|
|||
|
Changes in underlying premium rate action assumptions
|
318
|
|||
|
Changes in underlying expense and other assumptions
|
14
|
|||
|
September 30, 2020 Premium Deficiency
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
The premium deficiency was primarily driven by changes in discount rate assumptions due to lower expected reinvestment rates, contemplating both near-term market indications and long-term normative assumptions. This unfavorable driver was significantly offset by higher than previously estimated rate increases on active rate increase programs, new planned rate increase filings and favorable changes to the underlying persistency and morbidity assumptions.
CNA’s projections do not indicate a pattern of expected profits in earlier future years followed by expected losses in later future years. As such, CNA is not establishing additional future policy benefit reserves for profits followed by losses in periods where the long term care business generates core income. The need for these additional future policy benefit reserves will be re-evaluated in connection with the next GPV, which is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2021.
The table below summarizes the estimated pretax impact on CNA’s results of operations from various hypothetical revisions to its active life reserve assumptions. The annual GPV process involves updating all assumptions to management’s then current best estimate, and historically all significant assumptions have been revised each year. In the hypothetical revisions table below, CNA has assumed that revisions to such assumptions would occur in each policy type, age and duration within each policy group and would occur absent any changes, mitigating or otherwise, in the other assumptions. Although such hypothetical revisions are not currently required or anticipated, CNA believes they could occur based on past variances in experience and its expectations of the ranges of future experience that could reasonably occur. Any actual adjustment would be dependent on the specific policies affected and, therefore, may differ from the estimates summarized below.
|
|
Estimated Reduction
|
|||
|
2020 GPV
|
to Pretax Income
|
|||
|
(In millions)
|
||||
|
Hypothetical revisions
|
||||
|
Morbidity:
|
||||
|
2.5% increase in morbidity
|
$
|
339
|
||
|
5% increase in morbidity
|
677
|
|||
|
Persistency:
|
||||
|
5% decrease in active life mortality and lapse
|
$
|
254
|
||
|
10% decrease in active life mortality and lapse
|
469
|
|||
|
Discount rates:
|
||||
|
25 basis point decline in new money interest rates
|
$
|
175
|
||
|
50 basis point decline in new money interest rates
|
356
|
|||
|
Premium rate actions:
|
||||
|
25% decrease in anticipated future premium rate increases
|
$
|
66
|
||
|
50% decrease in anticipated future premium rate increases
|
132
|
|||
The following tables summarize policyholder reserves for CNA’s long term care operations:
|
|
Claim and claim
|
|||||||||||
|
adjustment
|
Future
|
|||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
expenses
|
policy benefits
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Long term care
|
$
|
2,844
|
$
|
9,762
|
$
|
12,606
|
||||||
|
Structured settlement annuities
|
543
|
543
|
||||||||||
|
Other
|
10
|
10
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
3,397
|
9,762
|
13,159
|
|||||||||
|
Shadow adjustments
(a)
|
218
|
3,293
|
3,511
|
|||||||||
|
Ceded reserves
(b)
|
128
|
263
|
391
|
|||||||||
|
Total gross reserves
|
$
|
3,743
|
$
|
13,318
|
$
|
17,061
|
||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||
|
Long term care
|
$
|
2,863
|
$
|
9,470
|
$
|
12,333
|
||||||
|
Structured settlement annuities
|
515
|
515
|
||||||||||
|
Other
|
12
|
12
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
3,390
|
9,470
|
12,860
|
|||||||||
|
Shadow adjustments
(a)
|
167
|
2,615
|
2,782
|
|||||||||
|
Ceded reserves
(b)
|
159
|
226
|
385
|
|||||||||
|
Total gross reserves
|
$
|
3,716
|
$
|
12,311
|
$
|
16,027
|
||||||
| (a) |
To the extent that unrealized gains on fixed income securities supporting long term care products and annuity contracts would result in a premium deficiency if those gains were realized, an increase in Insurance reserves is recorded, after tax and noncontrolling interests, as a reduction of net unrealized gains through Other comprehensive income (loss) (“Shadow Adjustments”).
|
| (b) |
Ceded reserves relate to claim or policy reserves fully reinsured in connection with a sale or exit from the underlying business.
|
CATASTROPHES AND RELATED REINSURANCE
Various events can cause catastrophe losses. These events can be natural or man-made, including hurricanes, windstorms, earthquakes, hail, severe winter weather, fires, floods, riots, strikes, civil unrest, cyber attacks, pandemics and acts of terrorism that produce unusually large aggregate losses. In most, but not all cases, CNA’s catastrophe losses from these events in the U.S. are defined consistent with the definition of the Property Claims Service (“PCS”). PCS defines a catastrophe as an event that causes damage of $25 million or more in direct insured losses to property and affects a significant number of policyholders and insurers. For events outside of the U.S., CNA defines a catastrophe as an industry recognized event that generates an accumulation of claims amounting to more than $1 million for the International line of business.
Catastrophes are an inherent risk of the property and casualty insurance business and have contributed to material period-to-period fluctuations in CNA’s results of operations and/or equity. CNA reported catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, of $550 million and $179 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Net catastrophe losses for the year ended December 31, 2020 included $294 million related primarily to severe weather related events, $195 million related to the COVID-19 pandemic and $61 million related to civil unrest. Net catastrophe losses for the year ended December 31, 2019 related primarily to U.S. weather related events.
CNA generally seeks to manage its exposure to catastrophes through the purchase of catastrophe reinsurance and has catastrophe reinsurance treaties that cover property and workers’ compensation losses. CNA conducts an ongoing review of its risk and catastrophe coverages and from time to time makes changes as it deems appropriate. The following discussion summarizes CNA’s most significant catastrophe reinsurance coverage at January 1, 2021.
Group North American Property Treaty
CNA purchased corporate catastrophe excess-of-loss treaty reinsurance covering its U.S. states and territories and Canadian property exposures underwritten in its North American and European companies. Exposures underwritten through Hardy are excluded. The treaty has a term of May 1, 2020 to May 1, 2021 and provides coverage for the accumulation of covered losses from catastrophe occurrences above CNA’s per occurrence retention of $250 million up to $1.2 billion. Losses stemming from terrorism events are covered unless they are due to a nuclear, biological or chemical attack. All layers of the treaty provide for one full reinstatement.
Group Workers’ Compensation Treaty
CNA also purchased corporate Workers’ Compensation catastrophe excess-of-loss treaty reinsurance for the period January 1, 2021 to January 1, 2022 providing $275 million of coverage for the accumulation of covered losses related to natural catastrophes above CNA’s per occurrence retention of $25 million. The treaty provides $475 million of coverage for the accumulation of covered losses related to terrorism events above CNA’s retention of $25 million. Of the $475 million in terrorism coverage, $200 million is provided for nuclear, biological, chemical and radiation events. One full reinstatement is available for the first $275 million above the retention, regardless of the covered peril. CNA also purchased a targeted facultative facility to address exposure accumulations in specific peak terrorism zones.
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019 (“TRIPRA”)
CNA’s principal reinsurance protection against large-scale terrorist attacks, including nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks, is the coverage currently provided through TRIPRA which runs through the end of 2027. TRIPRA provides a U.S. government backstop for insurance-related losses resulting from any “act of terrorism”, which is certified by the Secretary of Treasury in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security for losses that exceed a threshold of $200 million industry-wide for the calendar year 2021. Under the current provisions of the program, in 2021 the federal government will reimburse 80% of CNA’s covered losses in excess of its applicable
deductible up to a total industry program cap of $100 billion. CNA’s deductible is based on eligible commercial property and casualty earned premiums for the preceding calendar year. Based on 2020 earned premiums, CNA’s estimated deductible under the program is $820 million for 2021. If an act of terrorism or acts of terrorism result in covered losses exceeding the $100 billion annual industry aggregate limit, Congress would be responsible for determining how additional losses in excess of $100 billion will be paid.
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, applied on a consistent basis. We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates used to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements. In general, our estimates are based on historical experience, evaluation of current trends, information from third party professionals and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the known facts and circumstances.
We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our Consolidated Financial Statements as their application places the most significant demands on our judgment. Due to the inherent uncertainties involved with these types of judgments, actual results could differ significantly from estimates and may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, equity, business and CNA’s insurer financial strength and corporate debt ratings.
Insurance Reserves
Insurance reserves are established for both short and long-duration insurance contracts. Short-duration contracts are primarily related to property and casualty insurance policies where the reserving process is based on actuarial estimates of the amount of loss, including amounts for known and unknown claims. Long-duration contracts are primarily related to long term care policies and are estimated using actuarial estimates about morbidity and persistency as well as assumptions about expected investment returns and future premium rate increases. The reserve for unearned premiums represents the portion of premiums written related to the unexpired terms of coverage. The reserving process is discussed in further detail in the Insurance Reserves section of this MD&A.
Long Term Care Reserves
Future policy benefit reserves for CNA’s long term care policies are based on certain assumptions including morbidity, persistency, inclusive of mortality, discount rates and future premium rate increases. The adequacy of the reserves is contingent upon actual experience and CNA’s future expectations related to these key assumptions. If actual or CNA’s expected future experience differs from these assumptions, the reserves may not be adequate, requiring CNA to add to reserves.
A prolonged period during which investment returns remain at levels lower than those anticipated in CNA’s reserving discount rate assumption could result in shortfalls in investment income on assets supporting CNA’s obligations under long term care policies, which may also require an increase to CNA’s reserves. In addition, CNA may not receive regulatory approval for the level of premium rate increases it requests.
These changes to CNA’s reserves could materially adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and equity. The reserving process is discussed in further detail in the Insurance Reserves section of this MD&A.
Reinsurance and Other Receivables
Exposure exists with respect to the collectibility of ceded property and casualty and life reinsurance to the extent that any reinsurer is unable to meet its obligations or disputes the liabilities CNA has ceded under reinsurance agreements. An allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables is recorded on the basis of periodic evaluations of balances due from reinsurers, reinsurer financial strength rating and solvency, industry experience and current and forecast economic conditions. Further information on CNA’s reinsurance receivables is included in Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Additionally, exposure exists with respect to the collectibility of amounts due from customers on other receivables. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded on the basis of periodic evaluations of balances due, currently as well as in the future, historical reinsurer default data, management’s experience and current and forecast economic conditions.
If actual experience differs from the estimates made by management in determining the allowances for doubtful accounts on reinsurance and other receivables, net receivables as reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets may not be collected. Therefore, our results of operations, financial condition and/or equity could be materially adversely affected. Further information on CNA’s process for determining the allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance and insurance receivables is in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Valuation of Investments and Impairment of Securities
Fixed maturity and equity securities are carried at fair value on the balance sheet. Fair value represents the price that would be received in a sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date, the determination of which may require us to make a significant number of assumptions and judgments. Securities with the greatest level of subjectivity around valuation are those that rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value and that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. These unobservable inputs are based on assumptions consistent with what we believe other market participants would use to price such securities. Further information on fair value measurements is included in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
CNA’s fixed maturity securities are subject to market declines below amortized cost that may result in the recognition of impairment losses in earnings. Factors considered in the determination of whether or not an impairment loss is recognized in earnings include a current intention or need to sell the security or an indication that a credit loss exists. Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether a credit loss has occurred for a security. CNA considers all available evidence when determining whether a security requires a credit allowance to be recorded, including the financial condition and expected near-term and long term prospects of the issuer, whether the issuer is current with interest and principal payments, credit ratings on the security or changes in ratings over time, general market conditions, industry, sector or other specific factors and whether CNA expects to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security.
CNA’s mortgage loan portfolio is subject to the expected credit loss model, which requires immediate recognition of estimated credit losses over the life of the asset and the presentation of the asset at the net amount expected to be collected. Significant judgment is required in the determination of estimated credit losses and any changes in CNA’s expectation of the net amount to be collected are recognized in earnings.
Further information on CNA’s process for evaluating impairments and expected credit losses is included in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We use a probability-weighted cash flow analysis to test property and equipment for impairment based on relevant market data. If an asset is determined to be impaired, a loss is recognized to reduce the carrying amount to the fair value of the asset. Management’s cash flow assumptions are an inherent part of our asset impairment evaluation and the use of different assumptions could produce results that differ from the reported amounts.
For a discussion of accounting standards updates that have been adopted or will be adopted in the future, please read Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.
We are a large diversified holding company. As such, we and our subsidiaries have significant amounts of financial instruments that involve market risk. Our measure of market risk exposure represents an estimate of the change in fair value of our financial instruments. Changes in the trading portfolio are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Market risk exposure is presented for each class of financial instrument held by us and our subsidiaries at December 31, assuming immediate adverse market movements of the magnitude described below. We believe that the various rates of adverse market movements represent a measure of exposure to loss under hypothetically assumed adverse conditions. The estimated market risk exposure represents the hypothetical loss to future earnings and does not represent the maximum possible loss nor any expected actual loss, even under adverse conditions, because actual adverse fluctuations would likely differ. In addition, since our and our subsidiaries investment portfolios are subject to change based on portfolio management strategy as well as in response to changes in the market, these estimates are not necessarily indicative of the actual results which may occur.
Exposure to market risk is managed and monitored by senior management of the parent company and its subsidiaries. Senior management approves the overall investment strategy and has responsibility to ensure that the investment positions are consistent with that strategy with an acceptable level of risk. Management of risk may include buying or selling instruments or entering into offsetting positions.
Interest Rate Risk – We and our subsidiaries have exposure to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level or volatility of interest rates. We and our subsidiaries attempt to mitigate our exposure to interest rate risk by utilizing instruments such as interest rate swaps, commitments to purchase securities, options, futures and forwards. We and our subsidiaries monitor our sensitivity to interest rate changes by revaluing financial assets and liabilities using a variety of different interest rates. Duration and convexity at the security level are used to estimate the change in fair value that would result from a change in each security’s yield. Duration measures the price sensitivity of an asset to changes in yield. Convexity measures how the duration of the asset changes with interest rates. The duration and convexity analysis takes into account the unique characteristics (e.g., call and put options and prepayment expectations) of each security, in determining the hypothetical change in fair value. The analysis is performed at the security level and is aggregated up to the asset category level.
The evaluation is performed by applying an instantaneous change in the yield rates by varying magnitudes on a static balance sheet to determine the effect such a change in rates would have on the recorded market value of our investments and the resulting effect on shareholders’ equity. The analysis presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market rates and prices which we believe are reasonably possible over a one year period.
The sensitivity analysis estimates the change in the fair value of interest sensitive assets and liabilities that were held on December 31, 2020 and 2019 due to an instantaneous change in the yield of the security at the end of the period of 100 basis points, with all other variables held constant.
The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Accordingly, the analysis may not be indicative of, is not intended to provide, and does not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes of market interest rates on our earnings or shareholders’ equity. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions that could be undertaken in response to changes in interest rates.
Our and our subsidiaries’ debt is primarily denominated in U.S. dollars and has been primarily issued at fixed rates, therefore, interest expense would not be impacted by interest rate shifts. The impact of a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on fixed rate debt would result in a decrease in market value of $636 million and $554 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019. The impact of a 100 basis point decrease would result in an increase in market value of $742 million and $602 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Altium Packaging has entered into interest rate swaps for a notional amount of $675 million to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in LIBOR on a portion of its variable rate debt. These swaps effectively fix the interest rate on the hedged portion of the term loan at a weighted-average rate of approximately 2.0% plus an applicable margin. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the impact of a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on variable rate debt, net of the effects of the swaps, would increase interest expense by approximately $3 million and $5 million on an annual basis.
Equity Price Risk – We and our subsidiaries have exposure to equity price risk as a result of investments in equity securities and equity derivatives. Equity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of equity prices which affect the value of equity securities or instruments that derive their value from such securities or indexes. Equity price risk was measured assuming an instantaneous 25% decrease in the underlying reference price or index from its level at December 31, 2020 and 2019, with all other variables held constant. A model was developed to analyze the observed changes in the value of limited partnerships held by the Company and its subsidiaries over a multiple year period along with the corresponding changes in various equity indices. The result of the model allowed us to estimate the change in value of limited partnerships when equity markets decline by 25%.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk – Foreign exchange rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in foreign currency exchange rates will impact the value of financial instruments. We and our subsidiaries have foreign exchange rate exposure when we buy or sell foreign currencies or financial instruments denominated in a foreign currency, which is reduced through the use of forward contracts. The sensitivity analysis assumes an instantaneous 20% decrease in the foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar from their levels at December 31, 2020 and 2019, with all other variables held constant.
Commodity Price Risk – We and our subsidiaries have exposure to price risk as a result of our investments in commodities. Commodity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of commodity prices that impact instruments which derive their value from such commodities. Commodity price risk was measured assuming an instantaneous decrease of 20% from their levels at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
We have exposure to price risk as a result of Altium Packaging’s purchases of certain raw materials, such as high-density polyethylene, polycarbonate, polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate resins in connection with the production of its products. The purchase prices of these raw materials are determined based on prevailing market conditions. Altium Packaging’s contracts with its customers provide for price adjustments for changes in resin prices on a prospective basis. Due to fluctuations in resin prices, over time resin raw material costs are generally offset by the change in revenues, so that Altium Packaging’s gross margins return to the same level as prior to the change in prices.
Credit Risk – We and our subsidiaries are exposed to credit risk relating to the risk of loss resulting from the nonperformance by a customer of its contractual obligations. Although nearly all customers pay for their services on a timely basis, the Company and its subsidiaries actively monitors the credit exposure to its customers. Certain of our subsidiaries may perform credit reviews of customers and may require customers to provide cash collateral, post a letter of credit, prepay for services or provide other credit enhancements.
The following tables present the estimated effects on the fair value of our and our subsidiaries’ financial instruments as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 due to an increase in yield rates of 100 basis points, a 20% decline in foreign currency exchange rates and a 25% decline in the S&P 500, with all other variables held constant, on the basis of those entered into for trading purposes and other than trading purposes.
Trading portfolio:
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|||||||||||
|
Fair Value Asset
|
Interest Rate
|
Equity Price
|
||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
(Liability)
|
Risk
|
Risk
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities – long
|
$
|
42
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
Equity securities – long
|
566
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
||||||||
|
– short
|
(14
|
)
|
4
|
|||||||||
|
Options – purchased
|
3
|
6
|
||||||||||
|
Other invested assets
|
21
|
|||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
2,680
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
||||||||
Other than trading portfolio:
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fair Value Asset
|
Interest Rate
|
Foreign Currency
|
Equity Price
|
|||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
(Liability)
|
Risk
|
Risk
|
Risk
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities
(a)
|
$
|
44,604
|
$
|
(2,963
|
)
|
$
|
(513
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
992
|
(30
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Limited partnership investments
|
1,798
|
(207
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other invested assets
|
76
|
(12
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Mortgage loans
|
1,151
|
(51
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
1,994
|
(2
|
)
|
(26
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
(b)
|
(29
|
)
|
2
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other derivatives
|
(19
|
)
|
20
|
|||||||||||||
| (a) |
From a financial reporting perspective, Shadow Adjustments related to life and group reserves would reduce the impact of the decrease in fixed maturity securities.
|
| (b) |
The market risk at December 31, 2020 will generally be offset by recognition of the underlying hedged transaction.
|
Trading portfolio:
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|||||||||||
|
Fair Value Asset
|
Interest Rate
|
Equity Price
|
||||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
(Liability)
|
Risk
|
Risk
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities – long
|
$
|
53
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
Equity securities – long
|
440
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
||||||||
|
– short
|
(17
|
)
|
4
|
|||||||||
|
Options – purchased
|
1
|
3
|
||||||||||
|
– written
|
(1
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Other invested assets
|
7
|
|||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
2,521
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
||||||||
Other than trading portfolio:
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fair Value Asset
|
Interest Rate
|
Foreign Currency
|
Equity Price
|
|||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
(Liability)
|
Risk
|
Risk
|
Risk
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities
(a)
|
$
|
42,187
|
$
|
(2,669
|
)
|
$
|
(458
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
865
|
(28
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Limited partnership investments
|
2,004
|
(238
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other invested assets
|
65
|
(11
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Mortgage loans
|
1,025
|
(45
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
2,107
|
(1
|
)
|
(27
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
(b)
|
(8
|
)
|
11
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other derivatives
|
(7
|
)
|
16
|
|||||||||||||
| (a) |
From a financial reporting perspective, Shadow Adjustments related to life and group reserves would reduce the impact of the decrease in fixed maturity securities.
|
| (b) |
The market risk at December 31, 2019 will generally be offset by recognition of the underlying hedged transaction.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data are comprised of the following sections:
|
|
Page
|
||
|
No.
|
|||
|
82
|
|||
|
83
|
|||
|
89
|
|||
|
91
|
|||
|
92
|
|||
|
93
|
|||
|
95
|
|||
|
97
|
|||
|
1.
|
97
|
||
|
2.
|
107
|
||
|
3.
|
109
|
||
|
4.
|
115
|
||
|
5.
|
121
|
||
|
6.
|
121
|
||
|
7.
|
122
|
||
|
8.
|
123
|
||
|
9.
|
138
|
||
|
10.
|
139
|
||
|
11.
|
142
|
||
|
12.
|
145
|
||
|
13.
|
146
|
||
|
14.
|
147
|
||
|
15.
|
148
|
||
|
16.
|
154
|
||
|
17.
|
155
|
||
|
18.
|
156
|
||
|
19.
|
157
|
||
|
20.
|
157
|
||
|
21.
|
161
|
||
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for us. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any control system, however well designed, including the possibility of human error and the possible circumvention or overriding of controls. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Management must make judgments with respect to the relative cost and expected benefits of any specific control measure. The design of a control system also is based in part upon assumptions and judgments made by management about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that a control will be effective under all potential future conditions. As a result, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting can provide no more than reasonable assurance with respect to the fair presentation of financial statements and the processes under which they were prepared.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
. Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The report of Deloitte & Touche LLP follows this Report.
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Loews Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Loews Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, of the Company and our report dated February 9, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's change in its method of accounting for measurement of credit losses on financial instruments in 2020.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, NY
February 9, 2021
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Loews Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Loews Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (a) 2 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 9, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for measurement of credit losses on financial instruments in 2020.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves – Property & Casualty — Refer to Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The estimation of property and casualty claim and claim adjustment expense reserves (“P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves”), including those claims that are incurred but not reported, requires significant judgment. Estimating P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves is subject to a high degree of variability as it involves complex estimates that are generally derived using a variety of actuarial estimation techniques and numerous assumptions and expectations about future events, many of which are highly uncertain. Modest changes in judgments and assumptions can materially impact the valuation of these liabilities, particularly for claims with longer-tailed exposures such as workers’ compensation, general liability and professional liability claims.
Given the significant judgments made by management in estimating P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, auditing P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the involvement of our actuarial specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves included the following, among others:
• We tested the effectiveness of controls related to the determination of P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including those controls related to the estimation of and management’s review of P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves.
• We tested the underlying data, including historical claims, that served as the basis for the actuarial analyses, to test that the inputs to the actuarial estimates were accurate and complete.
• With the assistance of our actuarial specialists:
o We developed a range of independent estimates of P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves and compared our estimates to the recorded reserves.
o We compared our prior year estimates of expected incurred losses to actual experience during the most recent year to identify potential bias in the Company’s determination of P&C claim and claim adjustment expense reserves.
Future policy benefit reserves – Long Term Care — Refer to Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The estimation of long term care future policy benefit reserves (“LTC future policy benefit reserves”) requires significant judgment in the selection of key assumptions, including morbidity, persistency (inclusive of mortality), discount rate and future premium rate increases.
A gross premium valuation (“GPV”) is performed annually to assess the adequacy of the LTC future policy benefit reserves. The actuarial assumptions underlying the recorded LTC future policy benefit reserves are “locked-in” absent an indicated premium deficiency. If the GPV indicates the recorded LTC future policy benefit reserves are not adequate (i.e. a premium deficiency exists), the assumptions are “unlocked” and the LTC future policy benefit reserves are increased to eliminate the premium deficiency.
Estimating future experience for long term care policies is subject to significant estimation risk as the required projection period spans several decades. Morbidity and persistency experience can be volatile while discount rates and premium rate increases can be difficult to predict. Modest changes in each of these assumptions can materially impact the valuation of these liabilities.
Given the significant judgments made by management in estimating LTC future policy benefit reserves, auditing LTC future policy benefit reserves required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the involvement of our actuarial specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to LTC future policy benefit reserves included the following, among others:
• We tested the effectiveness of controls related to the determination of LTC future policy benefit reserves, including those controls related to the estimation of and management’s review of LTC future policy benefit reserves.
• We tested the underlying data, including demographic and historical claims data, that served as the basis for the actuarial analyses, to test that the inputs to the actuarial estimates were accurate and complete.
• With the assistance of our actuarial specialists:
o We independently recalculated a sample of LTC future policy benefit reserves and compared our estimates to the recorded reserves.
o We evaluated the key assumptions applied in the GPV analysis, including comparing those assumptions to the Company’s historical experience, underlying portfolio yield and market data.
o We assessed the Company’s projection of future cash flows to evaluate the reasonableness of the 2020 charge related to unlocking LTC future policy benefit reserves to recognize a premium deficiency as a result of the most recently completed GPV.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets– Refer to Notes 1 and 6 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The evaluation of offshore drilling equipment, specifically drilling rigs, for impairment occurs whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
When the Company determines that the carrying value of a drilling rig may not be recoverable, an undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis is prepared to determine if there is a potential impairment. If the carrying value of a drilling rig is not recoverable, the carrying value is reduced to its fair value determined using a discounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis. These analyses utilize certain assumptions for each drilling rig under evaluation and consider multiple probability-weighted utilization and dayrate scenarios. The Company’s development of the dayrate assumption involves significant judgment relative to the current and expected market for the drilling rigs and expectations of future oil and gas prices.
Given the significant judgments made by management to identify indicators of impairment and to prepare probability-weighted cash flow analyses to determine if potential impairments exist and to measure fair value, auditing these impairment analyses required a high degree of auditor judgment, including the involvement of fair value specialists, and increased extent of effort related to evaluating indicators of impairment, including the utilization and dayrate assumptions used in the probability-weighted cash flow analyses.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to (i) the identification of indicators of impairment and (ii) the evaluation of the Company’s probability-weighted cash flow analyses for those drilling rigs with factors that indicated potential impairment included the following, among others:
• We evaluated the Company’s identification of impairment indicators by:
o Corroborating information used to identify impairment indicators through independent inquiries of offshore drilling marketing and operations personnel and by performing an independent assessment of potential indicators of impairment utilizing the individual drilling rig history, asset class history for dayrates, backlog and potential drilling rig opportunities.
o Considering industry and analysts reports and the impact of macroeconomic factors, such as future oil and gas prices, on the Company’s process for identifying indicators of impairment.
o Comparing the timing of impairments recorded by the Company with the timing of impairments recorded by the Company’s peers.
• With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the Company’s probability-weighted cash flow analyses for those drilling rigs with factors that had indicators of potential impairment by:
o Evaluating the reasonableness of the utilization and dayrate assumptions utilized in the Company’s probability-weighted cash flow analyses by evaluating potential drilling rig opportunities and considering industry reports and data.
o Comparing the assumptions used in the Company’s previous probability-weighted cash flow analyses to the assumptions used in the current probability-weighted cash flow analyses to assess for management bias.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, NY
February 9, 2021
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1969.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
Assets:
|
||||||||
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||
|
Investments:
|
||||||||
|
Fixed maturities, amortized cost of $
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Equity securities, cost of $
|
|
|
||||||
|
Limited partnership investments
|
|
|
||||||
|
Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans, less allowance for credit loss of $
|
|
|
||||||
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total investments
|
|
|
||||||
|
Cash
|
|
|
||||||
|
Receivables
|
|
|
||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
||||||
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred non-insurance warranty acquisition expenses
|
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred acquisition costs of insurance subsidiaries
|
|
|
||||||
|
Other assets
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
Liabilities and Equity:
|
||||||||
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||
|
Insurance reserves:
|
||||||||
|
Claim and claim adjustment expense
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Future policy benefits
|
|
|
||||||
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total insurance reserves
|
|
|
||||||
|
Payable to brokers
|
|
|
||||||
|
Short term debt
|
|
|
||||||
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred non-insurance warranty revenue
|
|
|
||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
||||||
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities
|
|
|
||||||
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock, $
|
||||||||
|
Authorized –
|
|
|
||||||
|
Common stock, $
|
||||||||
|
Authorized –
|
||||||||
|
Issued –
|
|
|
||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Less treasury stock, at cost (
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
||||||
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total equity
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
|
Insurance premiums
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Investment gains (losses) (Note 2)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty revenue
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating revenues and other
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty expense
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating expenses and other
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), after tax
|
||||||||||||
|
Changes in:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments with an allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other investments
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total unrealized gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||
|
Pension and postretirement benefits
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
|
|
Loews Corporation Shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated
|
Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
|
Other
|
Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Held in
|
Noncontrolling
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income (Loss)
|
Treasury
|
Interests
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 1, 2018, as reported
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Cumulative effect adjustments from changes in accounting standards
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 1, 2018, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid ($
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of Boardwalk Pipelines common units
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of Loews Corporation treasury stock
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid ($
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of subsidiary stock from noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of Loews Corporation treasury stock
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2019
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Loews Corporation Shareholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated
|
Common
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
|
Other
|
Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Held in
|
Noncontrolling
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income (Loss)
|
Treasury
|
Interests
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2019, as reported
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in accounting standards (Note 1)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 1, 2020, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid ($
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of subsidiary stock from noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of Loews Corporation treasury stock
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2020
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Investment (gains) losses
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||
|
Equity method investees
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Amortization of investments
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:
|
||||||||||||
|
Receivables
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Insurance reserves
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Trading securities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Purchases of fixed maturities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturities
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Proceeds from maturities of fixed maturities
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Purchases of equity securities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of equity securities
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Purchases of limited partnership investments
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of limited partnership investments
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Acquisitions
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Change in short term investments
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other, net
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net cash flow used by investing activities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||
Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Purchase of Boardwalk Pipeline common units
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Purchases of Loews Corporation treasury stock
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Purchases of subsidiary stock from noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Principal payments on debt
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other, net
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||
|
Net cash flow used by financing activities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net change in cash
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Cash, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash, end of year
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation
−
Loews Corporation is a holding company. Its consolidated subsidiaries are engaged in the following lines of business: commercial property and casualty insurance (CNA Financial Corporation (“CNA”), an
89.6
% owned subsidiary); transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids (Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (“Boardwalk Pipelines”), a wholly owned subsidiary); the operation of a chain of hotels (Loews Hotels Holding Corporation (“Loews Hotels & Co”), a wholly owned subsidiary); and the manufacture of rigid plastic packaging solutions (Altium Packaging LLC (“Altium Packaging”), a
99
% owned subsidiary). Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “Company” as used herein means Loews Corporation including its consolidated subsidiaries, the term “Net income (loss)
attributable to
Loews Corporation” as used herein means Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation shareholders and the term “subsidiaries” means Loews Corporation’s consolidated subsidiaries.
In the second quarter of 2020, Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (“Diamond Offshore”) was deconsolidated from the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Note 2 for further discussion.
Principles of consolidation
– The
Consolidated Financial Statements
include all subsidiaries and intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The equity method of accounting is used for investments in associated companies in which the Company generally has an interest of
20
%
to
50
%
.
Accounting estimates
– The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Investments
–
The Company classifies its fixed maturity securities as either available-for-sale or trading, and as such, they are carried at fair value. Short term investments are carried at fair value. Changes in fair value of trading securities are reported within Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in fair value related to available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of Other comprehensive income.
The cost of fixed maturity securities classified as available-for-sale is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, which are included in Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amortization of premium and accretion of discount for fixed maturity securities takes into consideration call and maturity dates that produce the lowest yield.
For asset-backed securities included in fixed maturity securities, the Company recognizes income using an effective yield based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When estimates of prepayments change, the effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date and anticipated future payments predominantly using the retrospective method.
To the extent that unrealized gains on fixed maturity securities supporting long term care products and structured settlements not funded by annuities would result in a premium deficiency if those gains were realized, a related increase in Insurance reserves is recorded, net of tax and noncontrolling interests, as a reduction of net unrealized gains through Other comprehensive income (“Shadow Adjustments”). Shadow Adjustments increased $
515
million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) and $
1.0
billion (after tax and noncontrolling interests) for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, net unrealized gains on investments included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) were correspondingly reduced by Shadow Adjustments of $
2.5
billion (after tax and noncontrolling interests) and $
2.0
billion (after tax and noncontrolling interests).
Equity securities are carried at fair value. CNA’s non-redeemable preferred stock investments contain characteristics of debt securities, are priced similarly to bonds and are held primarily for income generation through periodic dividends. While recognition of gains and losses on these securities is not discretionary, CNA does not consider the changes in fair value of non-redeemable preferred stock to be reflective of its primary operations. As such, the changes in the fair value of these securities are recorded through Investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company owns certain common stock with the intention of holding the securities primarily for market appreciation and as such, the changes in the fair value of these securities are recorded through Net investment income (loss).
The Company’s carrying value of investments in limited partnerships is its share of the net asset value of each partnership, as determined by the general partner. Certain partnerships for which results are not available on a timely basis are reported on a lag, primarily three months or less. These investments are accounted for under the equity method and changes in net asset values are recorded within Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Mortgage loans are commercial in nature, are carried at unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized fees and an allowance for expected credit losses, and are recorded once funded. The allowance for expected credit losses on mortgage loans is developed by assessing the credit quality of pools of mortgage loans in good standing using debt service coverage ratios (“DSCR”) and loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios. The DSCR compares a property’s net operating income to its debt service payments, including principal and interest. The LTV ratio compares the current unpaid principal balance of the loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan. The pools developed to measure the credit loss allowance use increments of DSCR and LTV to draw distinctions between risk levels. CNA applies expected credit loss rates by pool to the outstanding receivable balances. Changes in the allowance for mortgage loans are presented as a component of Investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Mortgage loans are included in Other invested assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Prior to 2020, mortgage loans were evaluated on an individual loan basis considering the collection experience of each loan and other credit quality indicators such as DSCR and the credit-worthiness of the borrower or tenants of credit tenant loan properties. Mortgage loans were considered to be impaired and a loss incurred when it was probable that contractual principal and interest payments would not be collected and any impairment losses were recognized as a direct write-down of amortized cost. Interest income from mortgage loans is recognized on an accrual basis using the effective yield method.
Investments in derivative securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported as a component of Investment gains (losses), Net investment income or Other comprehensive income (loss), depending on their hedge designation. A derivative is typically defined as an instrument whose value is “derived” from an underlying instrument, index or rate, has a notional amount, requires little or no initial investment and can be net settled. Derivatives include the following types of investments: interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, put and call options, warrants, futures, forwards, commitments to purchase securities, credit default swaps and combinations of the foregoing. Derivatives embedded within non-derivative instruments (such as call options embedded in convertible bonds) must be split from the host instrument when the embedded derivative is not clearly and closely related to the host instrument.
An available-for-sale security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost adjusted for accretion, amortization and allowance for credit losses. When a security is impaired, it is evaluated to determine whether CNA intends to sell the security before recovery of amortized cost or whether a credit loss exists. Losses on securities that CNA intends to sell are recognized as impairment losses within Investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. If a credit loss exists, an allowance is established and the corresponding amount is recognized as an impairment loss within Investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The allowance for credit losses related to available-for-sale fixed maturity securities is the difference between the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. In subsequent periods, the allowance is reviewed, with any changes in the allowance presented as a component of Investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in the difference between the amortized cost basis, net of the allowance, and the fair value, are recognized in Other comprehensive income.
Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an impairment loss has occurred for a security. CNA follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording an impairment loss, including the evaluation of securities in an unrealized loss position and securities with an allowance for credit losses on at least a quarterly basis.
CNA’s assessment of whether an impairment loss has occurred incorporates both quantitative and qualitative information. A credit loss exists if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis. Significant assumptions enter into these cash flow projections including delinquency rates, probable risk of default, loss severity upon a default, over collateralization and interest coverage triggers and credit support from lower level tranches. CNA considers all available evidence when determining whether an investment requires a credit loss write-down or allowance to be recorded. Examples of such evidence may include the financial condition and near-term and long-term prospects of the issuer, whether the issuer is current with interest and principal payments, credit ratings on the security or changes in ratings over time, general market conditions and industry, sector or other specific factors and whether it is likely that CNA will recover its amortized cost through the collection of cash flows.
Prior to 2020, CNA’s assessment of whether an impairment loss occurred also incorporated both quantitative and qualitative information. Fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position that CNA intended to sell, or it more likely than not would be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, were considered to be impaired and the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value of the security was recognized as an impairment loss in earnings as a direct write-down of amortized cost. The remaining fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position were evaluated to determine if a credit loss existed. If a credit loss was determined to exist, the credit loss was recognized in earnings as a direct write-down of amortized cost.
Credit losses -
The allowances for credit losses on fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans, reinsurance receivables, insurance receivables and trade receivables are valuation accounts that are reported as a reduction of a financial asset’s cost basis and are measured on a pool basis when similar risk characteristics exist. The allowance is estimated using relevant available information from both internal and external sources. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses and adjustments may be made to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for additional factors that come to the Company’s attention. This could include significant shifts in counterparty financial strength ratings, aging of past due receivables, amounts sent to collection agencies, or other underlying portfolio changes. Current and forecast economic conditions are considered, using a variety of economic metrics and forecast indices. The sensitivity of expected credit losses relative to changes to the forecast of economic conditions can vary by financial asset class. A reasonable and supportable forecast period is up to 24 months from the balance sheet date. After the forecast period, the Company reverts to historical credit experience. Collateral arrangements such as letters of credit and amounts held in beneficiary trusts to mitigate credit risk are considered in the estimate of the net amount expected to be collected. Amounts are written off against the allowance when determined to be uncollectible. Prior to 2020, the allowance for doubtful accounts for reinsurance, insurance and trade receivables was measured using an incurred loss methodology.
A policy election has been made to present accrued interest balances separately from the amortized cost basis of assets, and a practical expedient has been elected to exclude the accrued interest from the tabular disclosures for mortgage loans and available-for-sale securities. An election has been made not to estimate an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivables. The accrual of interest income is discontinued and the asset is placed on nonaccrual status within
90
days of the interest becoming delinquent. Interest accrued but not received for assets on nonaccrual status is reversed through Net investment income. Interest received for assets that are on nonaccrual status is recognized as payment is received. The asset is returned to accrual status when the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current, and future payments are expected. Interest receivables are presented in Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Joint venture investments
–Loews Hotels & Co
has interests in operating joint ventures related to hotel properties over which it exercises significant influence, but does not have control over them. Loews Hotels & Co uses the equity method of accounting for these investments. Loews Hotels & Co’s investment in these entities was $
299
million and $
356
million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and is reported in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Equity income (loss) for these investments was $
(
73
)
million, $
69
million and $
73
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and is reported in Operating expenses and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These equity method investments are reviewed for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable.
Hedging
– The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedging transactions. The Company also formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. When it is determined that a derivative for which hedge accounting has been designated is not (or ceases to be) highly effective, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. See Note 3 for additional information on the Company’s use of derivatives.
Securities lending activities
– The Company lends securities for the purpose of enhancing income or to finance positions to unrelated parties who have been designated as primary dealers by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Borrowers of these securities must deposit and maintain collateral with the Company of no less than
100
% of the fair value of the securities loaned. United States of America (“U.S.”) Government securities and cash are accepted as collateral. The Company maintains effective control over loaned securities and, therefore, continues to report such securities as investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Securities lending is typically done on a matched-book basis where the collateral is invested to substantially match the term of the loan. This matching of terms tends to limit risk. In accordance with the Company’s lending agreements, securities on loan are returned immediately to the Company upon notice. Collateral is not reflected as an asset of the Company. There was
no
collateral held at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Revenue recognition
– Premiums on property and casualty insurance contracts are recognized in proportion to the underlying risk insured and are principally earned ratably over the term of the policies. Premiums on long term care contracts are earned ratably over the policy year in which they are due. The reserve for unearned premiums represents the portion of premiums written relating to the unexpired terms of coverage.
Property and casualty contracts that are retrospectively rated or subject to audit premiums contain provisions that result in an adjustment to the initial policy premium depending on the contract provisions. These provisions stipulate the adjustment due to loss experience of the insured during the coverage period, or changes in the level of exposure to insurance risk. For such contracts, CNA estimates the amount of ultimate premiums that it may earn upon completion of the coverage period and recognizes either an asset or a liability for the difference between the initial policy premium and the estimated ultimate premium. CNA either adjusts such estimated ultimate premium amounts during the course of the coverage period based on actual results to date or by conducting premium audits after the policy has expired to determine the final exposure to insured risks. The resulting adjustment is recorded as either a reduction of or an increase to the earned premiums for the period.
Insurance receivables include balances due currently or in the future, including amounts due from insureds related to paid losses under high deductible policies, and are presented at unpaid balances, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. As of December 31, 2020, an allowance for doubtful accounts of $
33
million for insurance receivables has been established using a loss rate methodology to determine expected credit losses for insurance receivables. This methodology uses CNA’s historical annual credit losses relative to gross premium written to develop a range of credit loss rates for each dollar of gross written premium underwritten. The expected credit loss for amounts due from insureds under high deductible and retrospectively rated policies is calculated on a pool basis, informed by historical default rate data obtained from major rating agencies. Changes in the allowance are presented as a component of Other operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amounts are considered past due based on policy payment terms. Insurance receivables and any related allowance are written off after collection efforts are exhausted or a negotiated settlement is reached.
CNA’s non-insurance warranty revenues are primarily generated from separately-priced service contracts that provide mechanical breakdown and other coverages to vehicle or consumer goods owners, which generally provide coverage from
one month
to
ten years
. For warranty products where CNA acts as the principal in the transaction, Non-insurance warranty revenue is reported on a gross basis, with amounts paid by customers reported as Non-insurance warranty revenue and commissions paid to agents reported as Non-insurance warranty expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, CNA provides warranty administration services for dealer and manufacturer warranty products. Non-insurance revenues are recognized when obligations under the terms of the contract with CNA’s customers are satisfied, which is generally over time as obligations are fulfilled. CNA recognizes non-insurance warranty revenue over the service period in proportion to the actuarially determined expected claims emergence pattern. Customers pay in full at the inception of the warranty contract. The liability for unearned warranty revenue, reported as Deferred non-insurance warranty revenue on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, represents the unearned portion of revenue in advance of CNA’s performance, including amounts which are refundable upon cancellation.
Contract costs to obtain or fulfill non-insurance warranty contracts with customers are deferred and recorded as
Deferred non-insurance warranty acquisition expenses
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These costs are expected to be recoverable over the term of the contract and are amortized in the same manner the related revenue is recognized. CNA evaluates deferred costs for recoverability including consideration of anticipated investment income. Adjustments to deferred costs, if necessary, are recorded in the current period results of operations.
Diamond Offshore’s contract drilling revenues primarily result from providing a drilling rig and the crew and supplies necessary to operate the rig, mobilizing and demobilizing the rig to and from the drill site and performing rig preparation activities and/or modifications required for the contract. Consideration received for performing these activities may consist of dayrate drilling revenue, mobilization and demobilization revenue, contract preparation revenue and reimbursement revenue for the purchase of supplies, equipment, personnel services and other services requested by the customer. Diamond Offshore accounts for these integrated services provided within its drilling contracts as a single performance obligation satisfied over time and comprised of a series of distinct time increments in which drilling services are provided. The total transaction price is determined for each individual contract by estimating both fixed and variable consideration expected to be earned over the term of the contract. The standard contract term ranges from
to
60 months
.
Boardwalk Pipelines primarily earns revenues by providing transportation and storage services for natural gas and natural gas liquids and hydrocarbons (referred to together as “NGLs”) on a firm and interruptible basis and provides interruptible natural gas parking and lending services. The majority of Boardwalk Pipelines’ operating subsidiaries are subject to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) regulations and certain revenues collected, under certain circumstances, may be subject to possible refunds to its customers. An estimated refund liability is recorded considering regulatory proceedings, advice of counsel and estimated total exposure. The majority of Boardwalk Pipelines’ revenues are from firm service contracts which are accounted for as a single promise to stand ready each month of the contract term to provide the committed capacity for either transportation or storage services. The transaction price is comprised of a fixed fee based on the capacity reserved plus a usage fee paid on the volume of commodity transported or injected and withdrawn from storage. Both the fixed and the usage fees are allocated to the single performance obligation of providing transportation or storage service and recognized over time as control is passed to the customer. These service contracts can range in term from
to
20 years
and are invoiced monthly.
Loews Hotels & Co provides lodging and related goods and services as well as management and marketing services. Lodging and related revenues are recognized as the guest takes possession of the goods or receives the services. Management and marketing services revenues are recognized as the services are provided and billed on a monthly basis. In addition, Loews Hotels & Co recognizes revenue for the reimbursement of payroll and other expenses as they are incurred on behalf of the owners of joint venture and managed hotel properties.
Altium Packaging is a packaging solutions provider and manufacturer in North America, serving a diverse customer base in the pharmaceutical, dairy, household chemicals, food/nutraceuticals, industrial/specialty chemicals, water and beverage/juice segments. Altium Packaging recognizes revenue when obligations under the terms of a contract with a customer have been satisfied. This occurs at the time control is transferred to the customer, which generally occurs upon delivery or completion of the manufacturing process.
Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves
– Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, except reserves for structured settlements not associated with asbestos and environmental pollution (“A&EP”), workers’ compensation lifetime claims and long term care claims, are not discounted and are based on (i) case basis estimates for losses reported on direct business, adjusted in the aggregate for ultimate loss expectations; (ii) estimates of incurred but not reported losses; (iii) estimates of losses on assumed reinsurance; (iv) estimates of future expenses to be incurred in the settlement of claims; (v) estimates of salvage and subrogation recoveries and (vi) estimates of amounts due from insureds related to losses under high deductible policies. Management considers current conditions and trends as well as past CNA and industry experience in establishing these estimates. The effects of inflation, which can be significant, are implicitly considered in the reserving process and are part of the recorded reserve balance. Ceded claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are reported as a component of Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are presented net of anticipated amounts due from insureds related to losses under deductible policies of $
1.2
billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. A significant portion of these amounts are supported by collateral. CNA also has an allowance for uncollectible deductible amounts, which is presented as a component of the allowance for doubtful accounts included in Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Structured settlements have been negotiated for certain property and casualty insurance claims. Structured settlements are agreements to provide fixed periodic payments to claimants. CNA’s obligations for structured settlements not funded by annuities are included in claim and claim adjustment expense reserves and are discounted at a weighted average interest rate of
6.5
% and
7.1
% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the discounted reserves for unfunded structured settlements were $
520
million and $
497
million, net of discount of $
657
million and $
724
million. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the amount of interest recognized on the discounted reserves of unfunded structured settlements was $
35
million, $
36
million and $
40
million. This interest accretion is presented as a component of Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Operations but is excluded from the disclosure of prior year loss reserve development.
Workers’ compensation lifetime claim reserves are calculated using mortality assumptions determined through statutory regulation and economic factors. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, workers’ compensation lifetime claim reserves are discounted at a
3.5
% interest rate. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the discounted reserves for workers’ compensation lifetime claim reserves were $
258
million and $
293
million, net of discount of $
113
million and $
135
million. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the amount of interest accretion recognized on the discounted reserves of workers’ compensation lifetime claim reserves was $
15
million, $
21
million and $
16
million. This interest accretion is presented as a component of Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, but is excluded from the Company’s disclosure of prior year loss reserve development.
Long term care claim reserves for policyholders that are currently receiving benefits are calculated using mortality and morbidity assumptions based on CNA and industry experience. These long term care claim reserves are discounted at a weighted average interest rate of
5.8
% and
5.9
% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, such discounted reserves totaled $
2.7
billion, net of discounts of $
439
million and $
462
million.
Future policy benefit reserves
– Future policy benefit reserves represent the active life reserves related to CNA’s long term care policies for policyholders that are not currently receiving benefits and are computed using the net level premium method, which incorporates actuarial assumptions as to morbidity, persistency, inclusive of mortality, discount rate, future premium rate adjustments and expenses. Expense assumptions primarily relate to claim adjudication. These assumptions are locked in over the life of the policy; however if a premium deficiency emerges, the assumptions are unlocked, and the future policy benefit reserves are increased. The September 30, 2020 gross premium valuation (“GPV”) indicated a premium deficiency of $
74
million and future policy benefit reserves at that date were increased accordingly. As a result, the long term care active life reserves carried as of September 30, 2020 represent management’s best estimate assumptions at that date with no margin for adverse deviation. Long term care active life reserves are discounted at a weighted average interest rate of
5.4
% and
5.7
% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
I
n circumstances where the cash flow projections supporting future policy benefit reserves are expected to result in profits being recognized in early future years followed by losses in later future years, the future policy benefit reserves are increased in the future profitable years by an amount necessary to offset losses that are projected to be recognized in later future years. The amount of the additional future policy benefit reserves recorded in each period is determined by applying the ratio of the present value of future losses divided by the present value of future profits from the most recently completed GPV to long term care core income in that period.
Insurance-related assessments
– Liabilities for insurance-related assessments are accrued when an assessment is probable, when it can be reasonably estimated and when the event obligating the entity to pay an imposed or probable assessment has occurred. Liabilities for insurance-related assessments are not discounted and are included as part of Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the liability balances were $
82
million and $
84
million.
Reinsurance
– Reinsurance accounting allows for contractual cash flows to be reflected as premiums and losses. To qualify for reinsurance accounting, reinsurance agreements must include risk transfer. To meet risk transfer requirements, a reinsurance contract must include both insurance risk, consisting of underwriting and timing risk, and a reasonable possibility of a significant loss for the assuming entity.
Reinsurance receivables related to paid losses are presented at unpaid balances. Reinsurance receivables related to unpaid losses are estimated in a manner consistent with claim and claim adjustment expense reserves or future policy benefit reserves. Reinsurance receivables are reported net of an allowance for doubtful accounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cost of reinsurance is primarily accounted for over the life of the underlying reinsured policies using assumptions consistent with those used to account for the underlying policies or over the reinsurance contract period. The ceding of insurance does not discharge the primary liability of CNA.
As of December 31, 2020, an allowance for doubtful accounts of $
21
million for reinsurance receivables has been established which relates to both amounts already billed on ceded paid losses as well as ceded reserves that will be billed when losses are paid in the future. For assessing expected credit losses, CNA separates reinsurance receivables into two pools: voluntary reinsurance receivables and involuntary receivables related to mandatory pools. CNA has not recorded an allowance for involuntary pools as there is no perceived credit risk. The principal credit quality indicator used in the valuation of the allowance on voluntary reinsurance receivables is the financial strength rating of the reinsurer sourced from major rating agencies. If the reinsurer is unrated, an internal financial strength rating is assigned based on CNA’s historical loss experience and the assessment of reinsurance counterparty risk profile, which generally corresponds with a B rating. Reinsurer financial strength ratings are updated and reviewed on an annual basis or sooner if CNA becomes aware of significant changes related to a reinsurer. The allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables is estimated on the basis of periodic evaluations of balances due from reinsurers, reinsurer financial strength rating and solvency, industry experience and current and forecast economic conditions. Because billed receivables generally approximate
5
% or less of total reinsurance receivables, the age of the reinsurance receivables related to paid losses is not a significant input into the allowance analysis. Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables are presented as a component of Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Amounts are considered past due based on the reinsurance contract terms. Reinsurance receivables related to paid losses and any related allowance are written off after collection efforts have been exhausted or a negotiated settlement is reached with the reinsurer. Reinsurance receivables from insolvent insurers related to paid losses are written off when the settlement due from the estate can be reasonably estimated. At the time reinsurance receivables related to paid losses are written off, any required adjustment to reinsurance receivables related to unpaid losses is recorded as a component of Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
A loss portfolio transfer is a retroactive reinsurance contract. If the cumulative claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses ceded under a loss portfolio transfer exceed the consideration paid, the resulting gain from such excess is deferred and amortized into earnings in future periods in proportion to actual recoveries under the loss portfolio transfer. In any period in which there is a revised estimate of claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses and the loss portfolio transfer is in a gain position, the deferred gain is recalculated as if the revised estimate was available at the inception date of the loss portfolio transfer and the change in the deferred gain is recognized in earnings.
Deferred acquisition costs
– Deferrable acquisition costs include commissions, premium taxes and certain underwriting and policy issuance costs which are incremental direct costs of successful contract acquisitions. Acquisition costs related to property and casualty business are deferred and amortized ratably over the period the related premiums are earned. Deferred acquisition costs are presented net of ceding commissions and other ceded acquisition costs.
CNA evaluates deferred acquisition costs for recoverability. Anticipated investment income is considered in the determination of the recoverability of deferred acquisition costs. Adjustments, if necessary, are recorded in current period results of operations.
Policyholder dividends
–
Policyholder dividends are paid to participating policyholders within the workers’ compensation and surety lines of business. Net written premiums for participating dividend policies were approximately
1
% of total net written premiums for each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. Dividends to policyholders are accrued according to CNA’s best estimate of the amount to be paid in accordance with contractual provisions and applicable state laws. Dividends to policyholders are presented as a component of Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
– Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets of acquired entities. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or when certain triggering events require additional tests. Subsequent reversal of a goodwill impairment charge is not permitted.
Other intangible assets are reported within Other assets. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Indefinite-lived other intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or when certain triggering events require such tests. See Note 7 for additional information on the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets.
Property, plant and equipment
– Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of properties. Leaseholds and leasehold improvements are depreciated or amortized over the terms of the related leases (including optional renewal periods, where appropriate) or the estimated lives of improvements, if less than the lease term.
The principal service lives used in computing provisions for depreciation are as follows:
|
|
Years
|
|
Pipeline equipment
|
|
|
Offshore drilling equipment
|
|
|
Hotel properties and other
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
–Long-lived and finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets and intangibles with finite lives, under certain circumstances, are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any future service potential to the Company are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Income taxes
−
The Company and its eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated tax return. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial statement and tax return bases of assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax rates and other provisions of the tax law. The effect of a change in tax laws or rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period in which such change is enacted. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not, and a valuation allowance is established for any portion of a deferred tax asset that management believes may not be realized.
The Company recognizes uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take on a tax return. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. See Note 10 for additional information on the provision for income taxes.
Pension and postretirement benefits
– The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit plans in Other assets or Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in funded status related to prior service costs and credits and actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the year in which the changes occur through Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company measures its benefit plan assets and obligations at December 31. Annual service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service costs and credits and amortization of actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock-based compensation
– Loews Corporation records compensation expense upon issuance, modification or cancellation of all share-based payment awards granted, primarily on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, generally
to
four years
. Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive. These assumptions include the term that the awards are expected to be outstanding, an estimate of the volatility of the underlying stock price, applicable risk-free interest rates and the dividend yield of Loews Corporation’s stock. Restricted Stock Units are valued using the grant-date fair value of Loews Corporation’s stock.
Net income per share
– Basic net income per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stock by the weighted average number of Loews Corporation common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue Loews Corporation common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately
0.1
million potential shares attributable to issuances and exercises under the Loews Corporation 2016 Incentive Compensation plan and the prior plan were excluded in the calculation of diluted net income per share because the effect would have been antidilutive due to the net loss position of the Company. In addition, there were
0.2
million shares attributable to employee stock-based compensation awards excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share because the effect would have been antidilutive. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
0.7
million and
0.9
million potential shares attributable to issuances and exercises under the Loews Corporation 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan and the prior plan were included in the calculation of diluted net income per share. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were
no
shares attributable to employee stock-based compensation awards excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share because the effect would have been antidilutive.
Foreign currency
– Foreign currency translation gains and losses are reflected in Shareholders’ equity as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company’s foreign subsidiaries’ balance sheet accounts are translated at the exchange rates in effect at each reporting date and income statement accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the reporting period. There were foreign currency transaction gains (losses) of $
12
million, $(
3
) million and $
0
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Regulatory accounting
– The majority of Boardwalk Pipelines’ operating subsidiaries are regulated by FERC. Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (“Texas Gas”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Boardwalk Pipelines, applies regulatory accounting to certain assets for GAAP purposes, which records certain assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effect of the manner in which independent third party regulators establish rates. Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC (“Gulf South”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Boardwalk Pipelines, has implemented fuel trackers, for which regulatory accounting is applied. Accordingly, the value of fuel received from customers paying the maximum tariff rate and the related value of fuel used in transportation are recorded to a regulatory asset or liability depending on whether Gulf South uses more fuel than it collects from customers or collects more fuel than it uses. Other than as described for Texas Gas and the fuel trackers for Gulf South, regulatory accounting is not applicable to Boardwalk Pipelines’ other FERC regulated entities or operations.
Supplementary cash flow information
– Cash payments made for interest on long term debt, net of capitalized interest, amounted to $
463
million, $
560
million and $
558
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. Cash payments for federal, foreign, state and local income taxes amounted to $
20
million, $
190
million and $
101
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. Investing activities include $
63
million of previously accrued capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2020 and exclude $
17
million and $
15
million of accrued capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Accounting changes
– In June of 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The updated accounting guidance requires changes to the recognition of credit losses on financial instruments not accounted for at fair value through net income. For financial assets measured at cost, the expected credit loss model requires immediate recognition of estimated credit losses over the life of the asset and presentation of the asset at the net amount expected to be collected. This new guidance applies to mortgage loan investments, reinsurance and insurance receivables and other financing and trade receivables. For available-for-sale fixed maturity securities carried at fair value, estimated credit losses will continue to be measured at the present value of expected cash flows, however, the other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) concept has been eliminated. Under the previous guidance, estimated credit impairments resulted in a write down of amortized cost. Under the new guidance, estimated credit losses are recognized through an allowance and reversals of the allowance are permitted if the estimate of credit losses declines. For available-for-sale fixed maturity securities where there is an intent to sell, impairment will continue to result in a write down of amortized cost.
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted the updated guidance using a modified retrospective method with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to beginning Retained earnings. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the previous accounting guidance. A prospective transition approach is required for available-for-sale fixed maturity securities that were purchased with credit deterioration (“PCD assets”) or have recognized an OTTI write down prior to the effective date. The cumulative effect of the accounting change resulted in a $
5
million decrease in Retained earnings, after tax and noncontrolling interests.
The allowance for doubtful accounts for reinsurance, insurance and trade receivables was unchanged as a result of adopting the new guidance. At adoption, an allowance for credit losses of $
6
million was established for available-for-sale fixed maturity securities that were PCD assets, with a corresponding increase to amortized cost, resulting in no adjustment to the carrying value of the securities.
See the accounting policy discussion within this note as well as Notes 3 and 16 for additional information on credit losses.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). The updated guidance required lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for most operating leases. The Company has elected to apply an exemption for short term leases whereby leases with initial lease terms of one year or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. At adoption, the cumulative effect adjustment increased Other assets and Other liabilities by $
642
million reflecting operating lease right of use assets, lease liabilities and the derecognition of deferred rent related primarily to lease agreements for office space and machinery and equipment. See Note 9 for additional information on leases.
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). The core principle of the accounting guidance is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard excluded from its scope the accounting for insurance contracts, financial instruments and certain other agreements that are subject to other guidance in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which limited the impact of this change in accounting for the Company. The Company adopted the updated accounting guidance using the modified retrospective method, with a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance sheet. At adoption, the cumulative effect adjustment decreased beginning Retained earnings by $
62
million (after tax and noncontrolling interests), resulted in a deferred tax asset of $
23
million and increased Deferred non-insurance warranty acquisition expenses by approximately $
1.9
billion and Deferred non-insurance warranty revenue by approximately $
2.0
billion.
On January 1, 2018 the Company adopted ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments
–
Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”). The guidance primarily changed the model for equity securities by requiring changes in the fair value of equity securities to be recognized through the income statement. Prior period amounts were not adjusted and continued to be reported in accordance with the previous accounting guidance. Upon adoption of the updated accounting guidance the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of $
25
million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) as an increase to beginning Retained earnings.
On January 1, 2018 the Company adopted ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” The updated guidance
amended the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The Company adopted this updated guidance using the modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment of $
9
million (after noncontrolling interests) as a decrease to beginning Retained earnings with an offset to a deferred income tax liability.
On January 1, 2018 the Company early adopted ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2018-02”). The updated accounting guidance allowed a reclassification from AOCI to Retained earnings for certain tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The impact of the change resulted in a $
3
million (after noncontrolling interests) increase in Retained earnings and a corresponding decrease in AOCI. The decrease in AOCI is comprised of a $
130
million (after noncontrolling interests) decrease in pension liability and a $
127
million (after noncontrolling interests) increase in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.
Recently issued ASUs
– In August of 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-12, “Financial Services – Insurance (Topic 944): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts.” The updated accounting guidance requires changes to the measurement and disclosure of long-duration contracts. The guidance requires entities to update annually cash flow assumptions, including morbidity and persistency, and update quarterly discount rate assumptions using an upper-medium grade fixed-income instrument yield. The effect of changes in cash flow assumptions will be recorded in Net income and the effect of changes in discount rate assumptions will be recorded in Other comprehensive income (“OCI”). This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2022. Early adoption is permitted. The Company may elect to apply the guidance using either a modified retrospective transition method or a full retrospective transition method. The guidance requires restatement of prior periods presented. The Company plans to use the modified retrospective transition method at adoption and is currently evaluating the effect the updated guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, including increased disclosure requirements. The annual updating of cash flow assumptions is expected to increase income statement volatility. While the requirements of the new guidance represent a material change from existing accounting guidance, the underlying economics of the business and related cash flows will be unchanged.
Note 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures and Deconsolidation
Diamond Offshore
On April 26, 2020 (the “Filing Date”), Diamond Offshore and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Chapter 11 Filing”). As a result of Diamond Offshore’s Chapter 11 Filing and applicable U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, effective as of the Filing Date, Loews Corporation no longer controlled Diamond Offshore for accounting purposes. Therefore, Diamond Offshore was deconsolidated from its consolidated financial statements effective as of the Filing Date. See Note 20 for Diamond Offshore’s revenues and expenses through the Filing Date.
Through the Filing Date, Diamond Offshore’s results were included in Loews Corporation’s consolidated financial statements and Loews Corporation recognized in its earnings its proportionate share of Diamond Offshore’s losses through such date. The deconsolidation resulted in the recognition of a loss of $
1.2
billion ($
957
million after tax) during the year ended December 31, 2020, which is reported within Investment gains (losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. This loss represents the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value, which was immaterial, of Loews Corporation’s investment in equity securities of Diamond Offshore as of the Filing Date.
Boardwalk Pipelines
On June 29, 2018, Boardwalk GP, LP (“General Partner”), the general partner of Boardwalk Pipelines and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Loews Corporation, elected to exercise its right to purchase all of the issued and outstanding common units representing limited partnership interests in Boardwalk Pipelines not already owned by the General Partner or its affiliates pursuant to Section 15.1(b) of Boardwalk Pipelines’ Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (“Limited Partnership Agreement”)
for a cash purchase price, determined in accordance with the Limited Partnership Agreement, of $
12.06
per unit, or approximately $
1.5
billion, in the aggregate.
The purchase price of the common units was lower than the carrying value of the noncontrolling interests for Boardwalk Pipelines, resulting in an increase to Additional paid-in capital of $
658
million, an increase to deferred income tax liabilities of $
213
million and a decrease to AOCI of $
29
million
.
Following completion of the transaction on July 18, 2018, Boardwalk Pipelines Holding Corp. (“BPHC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Loews Corporation, holds, directly or indirectly, all of the limited partnership interests of Boardwalk Pipelines.
Loews Hotels & Co
In 2020, Loews Hotels & Co received aggregate proceeds of $
57
million for the sale of an owned hotel and an office building. In 2019, Loews Hotels & Co received proceeds of $
118
million for the sale of an owned hotel. In 2018, Loews Hotels & Co received proceeds of $
40
million for the sale of an owned hotel.
Altium Packaging
In 2020, Altium Packaging paid approximately $
60
million for the acquisition of a packaging manufacturer. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price for the acquisition resulted in the recognition of approximately $
17
million of goodwill and approximately $
35
million of intangible assets, primarily related to customer relationships, and is subject to change within the measurement period. The acquisition was funded with available cash and debt financing at Altium Packaging.
In 2019, Altium Packaging paid approximately $
260
million for
three
acquisitions of plastic packaging manufacturers located in the U.S. and Canada, including the acquisition in June of 2019 of Altium Healthcare Inc. (formerly known as Tri State Distribution, Inc.), a retail pharmaceutical packaging solutions provider. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, revenues for the
three
acquisitions since acquisition were $
135
million and $
76
million and net results were not significant. The allocation of the purchase prices for the
three
acquisitions resulted in the recognition of approximately $
99
million of goodwill and approximately $
87
million of intangible assets, primarily related to customer relationships. The acquisitions were funded with approximately $
250
million of debt financing at Altium Packaging and available cash.
In 2018, Altium Packaging paid approximately $
40
million for
three
acquisitions of plastic packaging manufacturers located in the U.S. and Canada, resulting in recognition of approximately $
10
million of goodwill and approximately $
15
million of intangible assets, primarily customer relationships.
Note 3. Investments
Net investment income is as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Limited partnership investments
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income (loss) from trading portfolio (a)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Investment expenses
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net investment income
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
| (a) |
|
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019,
no
investments in a single issuer exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity, other than investments in securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises.
Investment gains (losses) are as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
|||||||
|
Equity securities
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Derivative instruments
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||
|
Short term investments and other
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||
|
Deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore (see Note 2)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Investment gains (losses) (a)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
| (a) |
|
The following table presents the activity related to the allowance on available-for-sale securities with credit impairments and PCD assets. Accrued interest receivables on available-for-sale fixed maturity securities totaled $
371
million and is excluded from the estimate of expected credit losses and the amortized cost basis in the tables within this Note.
|
Year ended December 31, 2020
|
Corporate and Other Bonds
|
Asset-backed
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
Allowance for credit losses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2019
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Additions to the allowance for credit losses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Impact of adopting ASC 326
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Securities for which credit losses were not previously recorded
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities accounted for as PCD assets
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Reductions to the allowance for credit losses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Securities sold during the period (realized)
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Additional increases or (decrease) to the allowance for credit losses on securities that had an allowance recorded in a previous period
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total allowance for credit losses
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
The components of available-for-sale impairment losses recognized in earnings by asset type are presented in the following table. The table includes losses on securities with an intention to sell and changes in the allowance for credit losses on securities since acquisition date:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:
|
||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Impairment losses recognized in earnings
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
The Company also recognized $
21
million of losses in 2020 related to mortgage loans primarily due to changes in expected credit losses.
The net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments, which consists solely of the change in unrealized gains on fixed maturity securities, was $
1.6
billion, $
2.6
billion and $(
1.8
) billion for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
The amortized cost and fair values of fixed maturity securities are as follows:
|
|
Cost or
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Allowance
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
for Credit
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Losses (a)
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities trading
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Cost or
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Unrealized
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
OTTI Losses
|
||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
(Gains) (a)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities trading
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||
| (a) |
|
The available-for-sale securities in a gross unrealized loss position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded are as follows:
|
|
Less than
|
12 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12 Months
|
or Longer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Other asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Other asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
Based on current facts and circumstances, the Company believes the unrealized losses presented in the December 31, 2020 securities in a gross unrealized loss position table above are not indicative of the ultimate collectability of the current amortized cost of the securities, but rather are attributable to changes in interest rates, credit spreads and other factors. The Company has no current intent to sell securities with unrealized losses, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost; accordingly, the Company has determined that there are
no
additional impairment losses to be recorded at December 31, 2020.
Contractual Maturity
The following table presents available-for-sale fixed maturity securities by contractual maturity.
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||||||||||
|
Cost or
|
Estimated
|
Cost or
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Value
|
Cost
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Due in one year or less
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain securities may be called or prepaid. Securities not due at a single date are allocated based on weighted average life.
Limited Partnerships
The carrying value of limited partnerships as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was approximately $
1.8
billion and $
2.0
billion, which includes net undistributed earnings of $
252
million and $
297
million. Limited partnerships comprising
54
% of the total carrying value are reported on a current basis through December 31, 2020 with no reporting lag,
9
% of the total carrying value are reported on a one month lag and the remainder are reported on more than a one month lag. The number of limited partnerships held and the strategies employed provide diversification to the limited partnership portfolio and the overall invested asset portfolio.
Limited partnerships comprising
56
% and
66
% of the carrying value as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 employ hedge fund strategies. Limited partnerships comprising
36
% and
29
% of the carrying value at December 31, 2020 and 2019 were invested in private debt and equity and the remainder were primarily invested in real estate strategies. Hedge fund strategies include both long and short positions in fixed income, equity and derivative instruments. These hedge fund strategies may seek to generate gains from mispriced or undervalued securities, price differentials between securities, distressed investments, sector rotation or various arbitrage disciplines. Within hedge fund strategies, approximately
46
% were equity related,
36
% pursued a multi-strategy approach,
11
% were focused on distressed investments and
7
% were fixed income related as of December 31, 2020.
The
ten
largest limited partnership positions held totaled $
914
million and $
1.1
billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. Based on the most recent information available regarding the Company’s percentage ownership of the individual limited partnerships, the carrying value reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets represents approximately
2
% of the aggregate partnership equity at December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related income reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations represents approximately
2
%,
2
% and
3
% of the changes in aggregate partnership equity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
There are risks inherent in limited partnership investments which may result in losses due to short-selling, derivatives or other speculative investment practices. The use of leverage increases volatility generated by the underlying investment strategies.
The Company’s hedge fund limited partnership investments contain withdrawal provisions that generally limit liquidity for a period of
thirty days
up to
one year
or longer. Private equity and other non-hedge funds generally do not permit voluntary withdrawals. Typically, hedge fund withdrawals require advance written notice of up to
90
days.
Mortgage Loans
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of mortgage loans for each credit quality indicator by year of origination:
|
|
Mortgage Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year (a)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Prior
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DSCR ≥1.6x
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV less than 55%
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
LTV 55% to 65%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV greater than 65%
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DSCR 1.2x - 1.6x
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV less than 55%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV 55% to 65%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV greater than 65%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DSCR ≤1.2x
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV less than 55%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV 55% to 65%
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTV greater than 65%
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company may use derivatives in the normal course of business, primarily in an attempt to reduce exposure to market risk (principally interest rate risk, credit risk, equity price risk, commodity price risk and foreign currency risk) stemming from various assets and liabilities. The principal objective under such strategies is to achieve the desired reduction in economic risk, even if the position does not receive hedge accounting treatment.
The Company may enter into interest rate swaps, futures and forward commitments to purchase securities to manage interest rate risk. Credit derivatives such as credit default swaps may be entered into to modify the credit risk inherent in certain investments. Forward contracts, futures, swaps and options may be used to manage foreign currency and commodity price risk.
In addition to the derivatives used for risk management purposes described above, the Company may also use derivatives for purposes of income enhancement. Income enhancement transactions include interest rate swaps, call options, put options, credit default swaps, index futures and foreign currency forwards. See Note 4 for information regarding the fair value of derivative instruments.
The following tables present the aggregate contractual or notional amount and estimated fair value related to derivative financial instruments.
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contractual/
|
Contractual/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notional
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
Notional
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Asset
|
(Liability)
|
Amount
|
Asset
|
(Liability)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
With hedge designation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Without hedge designation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Options – purchased
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
– written
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Embedded derivative on funds
withheld liability
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investment Commitments
As part of the overall investment strategy, investments are made in various assets which require future purchase, sale or funding commitments. These investments are recorded once funded, and the related commitments may include future capital calls from various third-party limited partnerships, signed and accepted mortgage loan applications and obligations related to private placement securities. As of December 31, 2020, commitments to purchase or fund were approximately $
1.2
billion and to sell were approximately $
85
million under the terms of these investments.
Investments on Deposit
Securities with carrying values of approximately $
3.0
billion and $
2.7
billion were deposited by CNA’s insurance subsidiaries under requirements of regulatory authorities and others as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Cash and securities with carrying values of approximately $
1.1
billion were deposited with financial institutions in trust accounts or as collateral for letters of credit to secure obligations with various third parties as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Note 4. Fair Value
Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable:
|
•
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are not observable.
|
Prices may fall within Level 1, 2 or 3 depending upon the methodology and inputs used to estimate fair value for each specific security. In general, securities are priced using third party pricing services. Securities not priced by pricing services are submitted to independent brokers for valuation and, if those are not available, internally developed pricing models are used to value assets using a methodology and inputs that market participants presumably would use to value the assets. Prices obtained from third-party pricing services or brokers are not adjusted.
Control procedures are performed over information obtained from pricing services and brokers to ensure prices received represent a reasonable estimate of fair value and to confirm representations regarding whether inputs are observable or unobservable. Procedures may include: (i) the review of pricing service methodologies or broker pricing qualifications, (ii) back-testing, where past fair value estimates are compared to actual transactions executed in the market on similar dates, (iii) exception reporting, where period-over-period changes in price are reviewed and challenged with the pricing service or broker based on exception criteria and (iv) detailed analysis, where an independent analysis is performed of the inputs and assumptions used to price individual securities.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the following tables. Corporate bonds and other includes obligations of the U.S. Treasury, government-sponsored enterprises, foreign governments and redeemable preferred stock.
|
December 31, 2020
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds and other
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities trading
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Short term and other
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Payable to brokers
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds and other
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities trading
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Short term and other
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Receivables
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Payable to brokers
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
The following tables present reconciliations for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
|
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gains
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized
|
(Losses)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gains
|
Recognized in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Losses)
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recognized in
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Realized Investment
|
Net Income
|
Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gains (Losses) and Net
|
(Loss) on Level
|
on Level 3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in Unrealized
|
3 Assets and
|
Assets and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment Gains (Losses)
|
Transfers
|
Transfers
|
Liabilities
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
|
Included in
|
Included in
|
into
|
out of
|
Balance,
|
Held at
|
Held at
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
January 1
|
Net Income
|
OCI
|
Purchases
|
Sales
|
Settlements
|
Level 3
|
Level 3
|
December 31
|
December 31
|
December 31
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds and other
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities trading
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gains
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized
|
(Losses)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gains
|
Recognized in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Losses)
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recognized in
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Realized Investment
|
Net Income
|
Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gains (Losses) and Net
|
(Loss) on Level
|
on Level 3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in Unrealized
|
3 Assets and
|
Assets and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment Gains (Losses)
|
Transfers
|
Transfers
|
Liabilities
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance,
|
Included in
|
Included in
|
into
|
out of
|
Balance,
|
Held at
|
Held at
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
January 1
|
Net Income
|
OCI
|
Purchases
|
Sales
|
Settlements
|
Level 3
|
Level 3
|
December 31
|
December 31
|
December 31
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate bonds and other
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturities trading
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment gains and losses are reported in Net income as follows:
|
Major Category of Assets and Liabilities
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Line Items
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale
|
Investment gains (losses)
|
|
Fixed maturity securities trading
|
Net investment income
|
|
Equity securities
|
Investment gains (losses) and Net investment income
|
|
Other invested assets
|
Investment gains (losses) and Net investment income
|
|
Derivative financial instruments held in a trading portfolio
|
Net investment income
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, other
|
Investment gains (losses) and Operating revenues and other
|
Securities may be transferred in or out of levels within the fair value hierarchy based on the availability of observable market information and quoted prices used to determine the fair value of the security. The availability of observable market information and quoted prices varies based on market conditions and trading volume.
Valuation Methodologies and Inputs
The following section describes the valuation methodologies and relevant inputs used to measure different financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the instruments are generally classified.
Fixed Maturity Securities
Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities and exchange traded bonds valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 securities include most other fixed maturity securities as the significant inputs are observable in the marketplace. All classes of Level 2 fixed maturity securities are valued using a methodology based on information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, a discounted cash flow methodology or a combination of both when necessary. Common inputs for all classes of fixed maturity securities include prices from recently executed transactions of similar securities, marketplace quotes, benchmark yields, spreads off benchmark yields, interest rates and U.S. Treasury or swap curves. Specifically for asset-backed securities, key inputs include prepayment and default projections based on past performance of the underlying collateral and current market data. Fixed maturity securities are primarily assigned to Level 3 in cases where broker/dealer quotes are significant inputs to the valuation, and there is a lack of transparency as to whether these quotes are based on information that is observable in the marketplace. Level 3 securities also include private placement debt securities whose fair value is determined using internal models with some inputs that are not market observable.
Equity Securities
Level 1 securities include publicly traded securities valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 securities are primarily valued using pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions and other pricing models utilizing market observable inputs. Level 3 securities are primarily priced using broker/dealer quotes and internal models with some inputs that are not market observable.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Equity options are valued using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Over-the-counter derivatives, principally interest rate swaps, currency forwards, total return swaps, commodity swaps, equity warrants and options, are valued using inputs including broker/dealer quotes and are classified within Level 2 or Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, depending on the amount of transparency as to whether these quotes are based on information that is observable in the marketplace.
Short Term and Other Invested Assets
Securities that are actively traded or have quoted prices are classified as Level 1. These securities include money market funds, treasury bills and exchange traded open-end funds valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 primarily includes commercial paper, for which all inputs are market observable. Fixed maturity securities purchased within one year of maturity are classified consistent with fixed maturity securities discussed above. Short term investments as presented in the tables above differ from the amounts presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets because certain short term investments, such as time deposits, are not measured at fair value.
Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs utilized in the fair value measurement of Level 3 assets. Valuations for assets and liabilities not presented in the tables below are primarily based on broker/dealer quotes for which there is a lack of transparency as to inputs used to develop the valuations. The quantitative detail of unobservable inputs from these broker quotes is neither provided nor reasonably available. The weighted average rate is calculated based on fair value.
|
|
Range
|
|||||||||
|
Estimated
|
Valuation
|
Unobservable
|
(Weighted
|
|||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Fair Value
|
Techniques
|
Inputs
|
Average)
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
%)
|
||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
%)
|
||||
For fixed maturity securities, an increase to the credit spread assumptions would result in a lower fair value measurement.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value
The carrying amount, estimated fair value and the level of the fair value hierarchy of the financial assets and liabilities which are not measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are presented in the following tables. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of short term debt and long term debt exclude finance lease obligations. The carrying amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and short term investments not carried at fair value and certain other assets and liabilities approximate fair value due to the short term nature of these items.
|
|
Carrying
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Amount
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short term debt
|
|
-
|
$
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
The fair values of debt were based on observable market prices when available. When observable market prices were not available, the fair values of debt were based on observable market prices of comparable instruments adjusted for differences between the observed instruments and the instruments being valued or is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Note 5. Receivables
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Reinsurance (Note 16)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Insurance
|
|
|
||||||
|
Receivable from brokers
|
|
|
||||||
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
||||||
|
Federal income taxes
|
|
|
||||||
|
Other, primarily customer accounts
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
||||||
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables
|
|
|
||||||
|
allowance for other doubtful accounts
|
|
|
||||||
|
Receivables
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
Note 6. Property, Plant and Equipment
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Pipeline equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Hotel properties (net of accumulated depreciation of $
|
|
|
||||||
|
Offshore drilling equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $
|
|
|||||||
|
Other (net of accumulated depreciation of $
|
|
|
||||||
|
Construction in process
|
|
|
||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
Depreciation expense and capital expenditures are as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Depre-
|
Capital
|
Depre-
|
Capital
|
Depre-
|
Capital
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
ciation
|
Expend.
|
ciation
|
Expend.
|
ciation
|
Expend.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CNA Financial
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Boardwalk Pipelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Loews Hotels & Co
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Diamond Offshore (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
Capitalized interest related to the construction and upgrade of qualifying assets amounted to approximately $
14
million, $
18
million and $
27
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Asset Impairments
During the first quarter of 2020,
five
drilling rigs that had indicators of impairment were evaluated. Based on the assumptions and analysis at that time, it was determined that the carrying values of
four
of these rigs were impaired. The fair values of these rigs were estimated using multiple probability-weighted cash flow analyses, whereby the fair value of each rig was estimated based on a calculation of the rig’s future net cash flows. These calculations utilized significant unobservable inputs, including utilization and dayrate scenarios, as well as management’s assumptions related to future oil and gas prices. These fair value estimates were representative of Level 3 fair value measurements due to the significant level of estimation involved and the lack of transparency as to the inputs used. An aggregate asset impairment charge of $
774
million ($
408
million after tax and noncontrolling interests) was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020 and is reported within Operating expenses and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During 2018, Diamond Offshore recorded an asset impairment charge of $
27
million ($
12
million after tax and noncontrolling interests) to recognize a reduction in fair value of the
Ocean Scepter
. Diamond Offshore estimated the fair value of the impaired rig using a market approach based on a signed agreement to sell the rig, less estimated costs to sell. This valuation approach is considered to be a Level 3 fair value measurement due to the level of estimation involved as the sale had not yet been completed at the time of the analysis.
Loews Hotels & Co evaluates properties with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. It was determined that the carrying values of
one
property and capitalized costs related to a potential development project in 2020,
four
properties in 2019 and
two
properties in 2018 were impaired. Loews Hotels & Co recorded aggregate impairment charges of $
30
million ($
22
million after tax), $
99
million ($
77
million after tax) and $
22
million ($
15
million after tax) for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and are reported within Operating expenses and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These impairments reduced Property, plant and equipment by $
30
million and $
62
million in 2020 and 2019 and Other assets by $
37
million in 2019.
Loews Hotels & Co utilizes an undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis in testing the recoverability of its long-lived assets for potential impairment. Assumptions and estimates underlying this analysis include, among other things, (i) room revenue based on occupancy and average room rates, (ii) other revenue generated by the property, including food and beverage sales and ancillary services, as well as property specific revenue sources, (iii) operating expenses, including management and marketing fees and (iv) expenditures for repairs and refurbishments to maintain the asset’s value. When necessary, scenarios are developed using multiple assumptions of expected future events which Loews Hotels & Co assigns a probability of occurrence based on management’s expectations. This initial analysis results in a projected probability-weighted cash flow of the property, which is compared to the carrying value of the asset to assess recoverability. If the long-lived asset’s carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, Loews Hotels & Co compares the long-lived asset’s carrying value to fair value, estimating the fair value of the asset by discounting future cash flows using market participant assumptions or third-party indicators of fair value such as a recent independent appraisal. These calculations, at times, utilize significant unobservable inputs, including estimating the growth in the asset’s revenue and cost structure and are therefore considered Level 3 fair value measurements.
Note 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A summary of the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill is as follows:
|
|
CNA
|
Boardwalk
|
||||||||||||||
|
Financial
|
Pipelines
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2020
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
The increases as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 reflect the acquisitions made by Altium Packaging in 2020 and 2019. See Note 2 for further discussion on these acquisitions.
A summary of the net carrying amount of other intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
Amortization
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Finite-lived intangible assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Customer relationships
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total other intangible assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
The balance as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 includes assets from acquisitions made by Altium Packaging.
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 of $
61
million, $
45
million and $
32
million
is reported in Operating expenses and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
At December 31, 2020, estimated amortization expense in each of the next five years is approximately $
41
million in 2021, $
41
million in 2022, $
40
million in 2023, $
38
million in 2024 and $
36
million in 2025.
Note 8. Claim, Claim Adjustment Expense and Future Policy Benefit Reserves
Property and casualty insurance claim and claim adjustment expense reserves represent the estimated amounts necessary to resolve all outstanding claims, including incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) claims as of the reporting date. Reserve projections are based primarily on detailed analysis of the facts in each case, experience with similar cases and various historical development patterns. Consideration is given to historical patterns such as claim reserving trends and settlement practices, loss payments, pending levels of unpaid claims and product mix, as well as court decisions and economic conditions including inflation and public attitudes. All of these factors can affect the estimation of claim and claim adjustment expense reserves.
Establishing claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for catastrophic events that have occurred, is an estimation process. Many factors can ultimately affect the final settlement of a claim and, therefore, the necessary reserve. Changes in the law, results of litigation, medical costs, the cost of repair materials and labor rates can affect ultimate claim costs. In addition, time can be a critical part of reserving determinations since the longer the span between the incidence of a loss and the payment or settlement of the claim, the more variable the ultimate settlement amount can be. Accordingly, short-tail claims, such as property damage claims, tend to be more reasonably estimable than long-tail claims, such as workers’ compensation, general liability and professional liability claims. Adjustments to prior year reserve estimates, if necessary, are reflected in the results of operations in the period that the need for such adjustments is determined. There can be no assurance that the ultimate cost for insurance losses will not exceed current estimates.
CNA’s commercial property and casualty insurance operations (“Property & Casualty Operations”) include its Specialty, Commercial and International lines of business. CNA’s Other Insurance Operations outside of Property & Casualty Operations include its long term care business that is in run-off, certain corporate expenses, including interest on CNA’s corporate debt, and certain property and casualty businesses in run-off, including CNA Re and A&EP.
Liability for Unpaid Claim and Claim Adjustment Expenses
The table below reconciles the net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses to the amount presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
December 31
|
2020
|
|||
|
(In millions)
|
||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses:
|
||||
|
Property & Casualty Operations
|
$
|
|
||
|
Other Insurance Operations (a)
|
|
|||
|
Total net claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
|
|||
|
Reinsurance receivables: (b)
|
||||
|
Property & Casualty Operations
|
|
|||
|
Other Insurance Operations (c)
|
|
|||
|
Total reinsurance receivables
|
|
|||
|
Total gross liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
||
| (a) |
|
| (b) |
|
| (c) |
|
The following table presents a reconciliation between beginning and ending claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including claim and claim adjustment expense reserves of Other Insurance Operations.
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Reserves, beginning of year:
|
||||||||||||
|
Gross
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Ceded
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net reserves, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Provision for insured events of current year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Decrease in provision for insured events of prior years
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Amortization of discount
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total net incurred
(a)
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net payments attributable to:
|
||||||||||||
|
Current year events
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Prior year events
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total net payments
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net reserves, end of year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Ceded reserves, end of year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Gross reserves, end of year
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
| (a) |
|
Reserving Methodology
In developing claim and claim adjustment expense (“loss” or “losses”) reserve estimates, CNA’s actuaries perform detailed reserve analyses that are staggered throughout the year. Every reserve group is reviewed at least once during the year, but most are reviewed more frequently. The analyses generally review losses gross of ceded reinsurance and apply the ceded reinsurance terms to the gross estimates to establish estimates net of reinsurance. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, the historical pattern and volatility of the actuarial indications, the sensitivity of the actuarial indications to changes in paid and incurred loss patterns, the consistency of claims handling processes, the consistency of case reserving practices, changes in CNA’s pricing and underwriting, pricing and underwriting trends in the insurance market and legal, judicial, social and economic trends. In addition to the detailed analyses, CNA reviews actual loss emergence for all products each quarter.
In developing the loss reserve estimates for property and casualty contracts, CNA generally projects ultimate losses using several common actuarial methods as listed below. CNA reviews the various indications from the various methods and applies judgment to select an actuarial point estimate. The carried reserve may differ from the actuarial point estimate as a result of CNA’s consideration of the factors noted above as well as the potential volatility of the projections associated with the specific product being analyzed and other factors affecting claims costs that may not be quantifiable through traditional actuarial analysis. The indicated required reserve is the difference between the selected ultimate loss and the inception-to-date paid losses. The difference between the selected ultimate loss and the case incurred or reported loss is IBNR. IBNR includes a provision for development on known cases as well as a provision for late reported incurred claims. The most frequently utilized methods to project ultimate losses include the following:
|
•
|
Paid development
: The paid development method estimates ultimate losses by reviewing paid loss patterns and applying them to accident years with further expected changes in paid losses.
|
|
•
|
Incurred development
: The incurred development method is similar to the paid development method, but it uses case incurred losses instead of paid losses.
|
|
•
|
Loss ratio
: The loss ratio method multiplies premiums by an expected loss ratio to produce ultimate loss estimates for each accident year.
|
|
•
|
Bornhuetter-Ferguson using premiums and paid loss
: The Bornhuetter-Ferguson using premiums and paid loss method is a combination of the paid development approach and the loss ratio approach. This method normally determines expected loss ratios similar to the approach used to estimate the expected loss ratio for the loss ratio method.
|
|
•
|
Bornhuetter-Ferguson using premiums and incurred loss
: The Bornhuetter-Ferguson using premiums and incurred loss method is similar to the Bornhuetter-Ferguson using premiums and paid loss method except that it uses case incurred losses.
|
|
•
|
Frequency times severity
: The frequency times severity method multiplies a projected number of ultimate claims by an estimated ultimate average loss for each accident year to produce ultimate loss estimates.
|
|
•
|
Stochastic modeling
: The stochastic modeling produces a range of possible outcomes based on varying assumptions related to the particular product being modeled.
|
For many exposures, especially those that are considered long-tail, a particular accident or policy year may not have a sufficient volume of paid losses to produce a statistically reliable estimate of ultimate losses. In such a case, CNA’s actuaries typically assign more weight to the incurred development method than to the paid development method. As claims continue to settle and the volume of paid loss increases, the actuaries may assign additional weight to the paid development method. For most of CNA’s products, even the incurred losses for accident or policy years that are early in the claim settlement process will not be of sufficient volume to produce a reliable estimate of ultimate losses. In these cases, CNA may not assign any weight to the paid and incurred development methods. CNA may use the loss ratio, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and frequency times severity methods. For short-tail exposures, the paid and incurred
development methods can often be relied on sooner, primarily because CNA’s history includes a sufficient number of years to cover the entire period over which paid and incurred losses are expected to change. However, CNA may also use the loss ratio, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and frequency times severity methods for short-tail exposures. For other more complex reserve groups where the above methods may not produce reliable indications, CNA uses additional methods tailored to the characteristics of the specific situation
.
CNA’s reserving methodologies for mass tort and A&EP are similar as both are based on detailed reviews of large accounts with estimates of ultimate payments based on the facts in each case and CNA’s view of applicable law and coverage litigation.
Gross and Net Carried Reserves
The following tables present the gross and net carried reserves:
|
|
Property
|
Other
|
||||||||||
|
and Casualty
|
Insurance
|
|||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Operations
|
Operations
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Gross Case Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Gross IBNR Reserves
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Net Case Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Net IBNR Reserves
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||
|
Gross Case Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Gross IBNR Reserves
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Net Case Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Net IBNR Reserves
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
Net Prior Year Development
Changes in estimates of claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, net of reinsurance, for prior years are defined as net prior year loss reserve development. These changes can be favorable or unfavorable.
The following table and discussion present details of the net prior year loss reserve development in Property & Casualty Operations:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Medical professional liability
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Other professional liability and management liability
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Surety
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Commercial auto
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||
|
General liability
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Workers’ compensation
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Property and other
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total pretax favorable development
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||
Development Tables
For CNA’s Property & Casualty Operations, the following tables present further detail and commentary on the development reflected in the financial statements for each of the periods presented. Also presented are loss reserve development tables that illustrate the change over time of reserves established for claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses arising from short-duration insurance contracts for certain lines of business within CNA’s Property & Casualty Operations. Not all lines of business are presented based on their context to CNA’s overall loss reserves, calendar year reserve development, or calendar year net earned premiums. Insurance contracts are considered to be short-duration contracts when the contracts are not expected to remain in force for an extended period of time.
The Cumulative Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses tables, reading across, show the cumulative net incurred claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses relating to each accident year at the end of the stated calendar year. Changes in the cumulative amount across time are the result of CNA’s expanded awareness of additional facts and circumstances that pertain to the unsettled claims. The Cumulative Net Paid Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses tables, reading across, show the cumulative amount paid for claims in each accident year as of the end of the stated calendar year. The Net Strengthening or (Releases) of Prior Accident Year Reserves tables, reading across, show the net increase or decrease in the cumulative net incurred accident year claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses during each stated calendar year and indicates whether the reserves for that accident year were strengthened or released.
The information in the tables is reported on a net basis after reinsurance and does not include the effects of discounting. The information contained in calendar years 2019 and prior is unaudited. To the extent CNA enters into a commutation, the transaction is reported on a prospective basis. To the extent that CNA enters into a disposition, the effects of the disposition are reported on a retrospective basis by removing the balances associated with it.
The amounts reported for the cumulative number of reported claims include direct and assumed open and closed claims by accident year at the claimant level. The number excludes claim counts for claims within a policy deductible where the insured is responsible for payment of losses in the deductible layer. Claim count data for certain assumed reinsurance contracts is unavailable.
In the loss reserve development tables, IBNR includes reserves for incurred but not reported losses and expected development on case reserves. CNA does not establish case reserves for allocated loss adjusted expenses (ALAE), therefore ALAE reserves are also included in the estimate of IBNR.
2020
Unfavorable development in medical professional liability was primarily due to higher than expected frequency of large losses in recent accident years and unfavorable outcomes on specific claims in older accident years.
Favorable development in other professional liability and management liability was primarily due to lower than expected loss emergence in accident year 2017 and accident years prior to 2010.
Favorable development in surety was due to lower than expected frequency and lack of systemic loss activity for accident years 2019 and prior.
Unfavorable development in commercial auto was due to higher than expected claim severity in CNA’s middle market and construction business in recent accident years.
Unfavorable development in general liability was driven by higher than expected emergence in mass tort exposures, primarily due to New York reviver statute-related claims from accident years prior to 2010, increased bodily injury severities in accident years 2012 through 2016 and higher than expected frequency and severity in CNA’s umbrella business in accident years 2015 through 2019.
Favorable development in workers’ compensation was due to favorable medical trends driving lower than expected severity in multiple accident years.
Unfavorable development in property and other was primarily due to higher than expected large loss activity in accident year 2019 in CNA’s middle market, national accounts and marine business units.
2019
Unfavorable development in medical professional liability was primarily due to higher than expected severity in accident years 2016 through 2018 in CNA’s aging services business, higher than expected severity in accident year 2013 in the allied healthcare business, unfavorable outcomes on individual claims and higher than expected severity in accident year 2017 in the dentists business.
Favorable development in other professional liability and management liability was primarily due to lower than expected claim frequency and favorable outcomes on individual claims in accident years 2017 and prior related to financial institutions, lower than expected large claim losses in recent accident years in CNA’s public company directors and officers liability business and lower than expected loss adjustment expenses across accident years 2010 through 2018.
Favorable development in surety was due to lower than expected frequency for accident years 2018 and prior.
Favorable development in commercial auto was primarily due to continued lower than expected severity across accident years 2015 and prior and a decline in bodily injury frequency in accident year 2018.
Unfavorable development in general liability was primarily due to higher than expected emergence in mass tort exposures, primarily from accident years 2016, 2015 and prior to 2010.
Favorable development in other coverages was due to lower than expected paid loss emergence on vehicle products in warranty, favorable medical trends driving lower than expected severity in accident years 2012 through 2018 in workers’ compensation, lower than expected claim severity related to catastrophe events in accident years 2017 and 2018 in property and other in Commercial and lower than expected large losses and claim severity in accident years 2018 and prior in Hardy, Europe and Canada in casualty. This was mostly offset by unfavorable development driven by higher than expected claims in Hardy on 2018 accident year Asian catastrophe events in property in International and potential design and construct exposures in professional indemnity within Europe financial lines in accident years 2017 and 2018.
2018
Unfavorable development in medical professional liability was primarily due to higher than expected severity in accident years 2014 and 2017 in CNA’s hospitals business. In addition, there was higher than expected frequency and severity in aging services in accident years 2014 through 2017 combined, partially offset by lower than expected frequency in accident year 2015.
Favorable development in other professional liability and management liability was primarily due to lower than expected claim frequency in recent accident years related to financial institutions and professional liability errors and omissions (“E&O”), favorable severity in accident years 2015 and prior related to professional liability E&O and favorable outcomes on individual claims in financial institutions in accident years 2013 and prior.
Favorable development in surety was due to lower than expected loss emergence for accident years 2017 and prior.
Unfavorable development in general liability was driven by higher than expected claim severity in unsupported umbrella in accident years 2013 through 2016.
Favorable development in workers’ compensation was driven by lower frequency and severity experience and favorable impacts from California reforms.
Favorable development in other coverages was driven by lower than expected claim severity in catastrophes in accident year 2017 for property in Commercial, better than expected frequency in the liability portion of the package business in Canada and general liability in Europe in casualty, and for accident years 2015 and prior in Europe in healthcare and technology for International. This was partially offset by unfavorable development primarily driven by increased loss severity in the accident year 2017 in Europe professional indemnity in specialty for International.
Property & Casualty Operations – Line of Business Composition
The table below presents the net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses, by line of business for Property & Casualty Operations:
|
December 31
|
2020
|
|||
|
(In millions)
|
||||
|
Medical professional liability
|
$
|
|
||
|
Other professional liability and management liability
|
|
|||
|
Surety
|
|
|||
|
Commercial auto
|
|
|||
|
General liability
|
|
|||
|
Workers’ compensation
|
|
|||
|
Property and other
|
|
|||
|
Total net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
||
Medical Professional Liability
Cumulative Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
2011 (a)
|
2012 (a)
|
2013 (a)
|
2014 (a)
|
2015 (a)
|
2016 (a)
|
2017 (a)
|
2018 (a)
|
2019 (a)
|
2020
|
IBNR
|
Number of Claims
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except reported claims data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Net Paid Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
__
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses for the accident years presented
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liability for unallocated claim adjustment expenses for accident years presented
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Strengthening (Releases) of Prior Accident Year Reserves
|
Years Ended
|
_
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
-
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for the accident years presented above
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total unallocated claim adjustment expense development
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
Other Professional Liability and Management Liability
Cumulative Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
2011 (a)
|
2012 (a)
|
2013 (a)
|
2014 (a)
|
2015 (a)
|
2016 (a)
|
2017 (a)
|
2018 (a)
|
2019 (a)
|
2020
|
IBNR
|
Number of Claims
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except reported claims data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Net Paid Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
__
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses for the accident years presented
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liability for unallocated claim adjustment expenses for accident years presented
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Strengthening (Releases) of Prior Accident Year Reserves
|
Years Ended
|
_
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
-
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for the accident years presented above
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for accident years prior to 2011
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total unallocated claim adjustment expense development
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
Surety
Cumulative Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
2011 (a)
|
2012 (a)
|
2013 (a)
|
2014 (a)
|
2015 (a)
|
2016 (a)
|
2017 (a)
|
2018 (a)
|
2019 (a)
|
2020
|
IBNR
|
Number of Claims
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except reported claims data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Net Paid Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
__
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses for the accident years presented
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liability for unallocated claim adjustment expenses for accident years presented
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expense
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Strengthening (Releases) of Prior Accident Year Reserves
|
Years Ended
|
_
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
-
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for the accident years presented above
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for accident years prior to 2011
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total unallocated claim adjustment expense development
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
Commercial Auto
Cumulative Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
2011 (a)
|
2012 (a)
|
2013 (a)
|
2014 (a)
|
2015 (a)
|
2016 (a)
|
2017 (a)
|
2018 (a)
|
2019 (a)
|
2020
|
IBNR
|
Number of Claims
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except reported claims data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Net Paid Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
__
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses for the accident years presented
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liability for unallocated claim adjustment expenses for accident years presented
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Strengthening (Releases) of Prior Accident Year Reserves
|
Years Ended
|
_
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
-
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for the accident years presented above
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total unallocated claim adjustment expense development
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
General Liability
Cumulative Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
2011 (a)
|
2012 (a)
|
2013 (a)
|
2014 (a)
|
2015 (a)
|
2016 (a)
|
2017 (a)
|
2018 (a)
|
2019 (a)
|
2020
|
IBNR
|
Number of Claims
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except reported claims data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Net Paid Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
__
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses for the accident years presented
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liability for unallocated claim adjustment expenses for accident years presented
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Strengthening (Releases) of Prior Accident Year Reserves
|
Years Ended
|
_
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
-
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for the accident years presented above
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total unallocated claim adjustment expense development
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
Workers’ Compensation
Cumulative Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
2011 (a)
|
2012 (a)
|
2013 (a)
|
2014 (a)
|
2015 (a)
|
2016 (a)
|
2017 (a)
|
2018 (a)
|
2019 (a)
|
2020
|
IBNR
|
Number of Claims
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except reported claims data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Net Paid Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
__
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses for the accident years presented
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other (b)
|
(
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liability for unallocated claim adjustment expenses for accident years presented
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Strengthening (Releases) of Prior Accident Year Reserves
|
Years Ended
|
_
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident Year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
-
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2018
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2019
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for the accident years presented above
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment for development on a discounted basis
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net development for accident years prior to 2011
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total unallocated claim adjustment expense development
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
| (b) |
|
The table below presents information about average historical claims duration as of December 31, 2020 and is presented as required supplementary information, which is unaudited.
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Ultimate Net Incurred Claim and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses in Year:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Medical professional liability
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other professional liability and management liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Surety (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Workers’ compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) |
|
A&EP Reserves
In 2010, Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”) together with several insurance subsidiaries completed a transaction with National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., under which substantially all of their legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO through a loss portfolio transfer (“loss portfolio transfer” or “LPT”). At the effective date of the transaction, approximately $
1.6
billion of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves were ceded to NICO under a retroactive reinsurance agreement with an aggregate limit of $
4.0
billion. The $
1.6
billion of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves ceded to NICO was net of $
1.2
billion of ceded claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves under existing third party reinsurance contracts. The NICO LPT aggregate reinsurance limit also covers credit risk on the existing third party reinsurance related to these liabilities. NICO was paid a reinsurance premium of $
2.0
billion and billed third party reinsurance receivables related to A&EP claims with a net book value of $
215
million were transferred to NICO, resulting in total consideration of $
2.2
billion.
In years subsequent to the effective date of the LPT, adverse prior year development on A&EP reserves was recognized resulting in additional amounts ceded under the LPT. As a result, the cumulative amounts ceded under the LPT have exceeded the $
2.2
billion consideration paid, resulting in the NICO LPT moving into a gain position, requiring retroactive reinsurance accounting. Under retroactive reinsurance accounting, this gain is deferred and only recognized in earnings in proportion to actual paid recoveries under the LPT. Over the life of the contract, there is no economic impact as long as any additional losses incurred are within the limit of the LPT. In a period in which a change in the estimate of A&EP reserves is recognized that increases or decreases the amounts ceded under the LPT, the proportion of actual paid recoveries to total ceded losses is affected and the change in the deferred gain is recognized in earnings as if the revised estimate of ceded losses was available at the effective date of the LPT. The effect of the deferred retroactive reinsurance benefit is recorded in Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table presents the impact of the loss portfolio transfer on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Additional amounts ceded under LPT:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net A&EP adverse development before consideration of LPT
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Provision for uncollectible third-party reinsurance on A&EP
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total additional amounts ceded under LPT
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Retroactive reinsurance benefit recognized
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Pretax impact of deferred retroactive reinsurance
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
Net unfavorable prior year development of $
125
million, $
150
million and $
178
million was recognized before consideration of cessions to the LPT for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
The unfavorable development in 2020 and 2019 was driven by higher than anticipated defense and indemnity costs on known direct asbestos and environmental accounts and a reduction in estimated reinsurance recoverable. The unfavorable development in 2018 was driven by higher than anticipated defense and indemnity costs on known direct asbestos and environmental accounts and by paid losses on assumed reinsurance exposures. Additionally, in 2020, 2019 and 2018, $
25
million, $
25
million and $
16
million of the provision for uncollectible third-party reinsurance was released.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the cumulative amounts ceded under the LPT were $
3.3
billion and $
3.2
billion. The unrecognized deferred retroactive reinsurance benefit was $
398
million and $
392
million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and is included within Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NICO established a collateral trust account as security for its obligations under the LPT. The fair value of the collateral trust account was $
4.2
billion and $
3.7
billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. In addition, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. guaranteed the payment obligations of NICO up to the aggregate reinsurance limit as well as certain of NICO’s performance obligations under the trust agreement. NICO is responsible for claims handling and billing and collection from third-party reinsurers related to A&EP claims.
Life & Group Policyholder Reserves
CNA’s Life & Group business includes its run-off long term care business as well as structured settlement obligations not funded by annuities related to certain property and casualty claimants. Long term care policies provide benefits for nursing homes, assisted living facilities and home health care subject to various daily and lifetime caps. Generally, policyholders must continue to make periodic premium payments to keep the policy in force and CNA has the ability to increase policy premiums, subject to state regulatory approval.
CNA maintains both claim and claim adjustment expense reserves as well as future policy benefit reserves for policyholder benefits for its Life & Group business. Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves consist of estimated reserves for long term care policyholders that are currently receiving benefits, including claims that have been incurred but are not yet reported. In developing the claim and claim adjustment expense reserve estimates for long term care policies, CNA’s actuaries perform a detailed claim reserve review on an annual basis. The review analyzes the sufficiency of existing reserves for policyholders currently on claim and includes an evaluation of expected benefit utilization and claim duration. In addition, claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are also maintained for the structured settlement obligations. In developing the claim and claim adjustment expense reserve estimates for structured settlement obligations, CNA’s actuaries monitor mortality experience on an annual basis. CNA’s recorded claim and claim adjustment expense reserves reflect management's best estimate after incorporating the results of the most recent reviews. Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for long term care policies and structured settlement obligations are discounted as discussed in Note 1.
CNA completed its annual claim reserve reviews in the third quarters of 2020, 2019 and 2018. CNA’s 2020 claim reserve reviews resulted in a $
46
million pretax increase in claim and claim adjustment expense reserve estimates for structured settlement obligations primarily due to lower discount rate assumptions and mortality assumption changes and a $
37
million pretax reduction in claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for long term care policies primarily due to lower claim severity than anticipated in the reserve estimates. CNA’s 2019 and 2018 claim reserve reviews resulted in $
56
million and $
31
million pretax reductions in claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for long term care policies primarily due to lower claim severity than anticipated in the reserve estimates.
Future policy benefit reserves consist of the active life reserves related to CNA’s long term care policies for policyholders that are not currently receiving benefits and represent the present value of expected future benefit payments and expenses less expected future premium. The determination of these reserves requires management to make estimates and assumptions about expected investment and policyholder experience over the life of the contract. Since many of these contracts may be in force for several decades, these assumptions are subject to significant estimation risk.
The actuarial assumptions that management believes are subject to the most variability are morbidity, persistency, discount rates and anticipated future premium rate increases. Morbidity is the frequency and severity of injury, illness, sickness and diseases contracted. Persistency is the percentage of policies remaining in force and can be affected by
policy lapses, benefit reductions and death. Discount rates are influenced by the investment yield on assets supporting long term care reserves which is subject to interest rate and market volatility and may also be affected by changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Future premium rate increases are generally subject to regulatory approval, and therefore the exact timing and size of the approved rate increases are unknown. As a result of this variability, CNA’s long term care reserves may be subject to material increases if actual experience develops adversely to CNA’s expectations.
Annually, in the third quarter, management assesses the adequacy of its long term care future policy benefit reserves by performing a GPV to determine if there is a premium deficiency. Under the GPV, management estimates required reserves using best estimate assumptions as of the date of the assessment without provisions for adverse deviation. The GPV required reserves are then compared to the existing recorded reserves. If the GPV required reserves are greater than the existing recorded reserves, the existing assumptions are unlocked and future policy benefit reserves are increased to the greater amount. Any such increase is reflected in the Company’s results of operations in the period in which the need for such adjustment is determined. If the GPV required reserves are less than the existing recorded reserves, assumptions remain locked in and no adjustment is required.
Periodically, management engages independent third parties to assess the appropriateness of its best estimate assumptions. The most recent third party assessment, performed in 2019, validated the assumption setting process and confirmed the best estimate assumptions appropriately reflected the experience data at that time.
The GPV for the long term care future policy benefit reserves performed in the third quarters of 2020 and 2019 indicated a premium deficiency primarily driven by lower discount rate assumptions. Recognition of the premium deficiencies resulted in $
74
million and $
216
million pretax increases in policyholders’ benefits reflected in the Company’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. CNA’s 2018 GPV for the long term care future policy benefit reserves indicated the reserves were not deficient and no adjustment was required.
Note 9. Leases
Lease agreements primarily cover office facilities and machinery and equipment and expire at various dates. The Company’s leases are predominantly operating leases, which are included in
and
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain significant residual value guarantees, restrictions or covenants.
Operating lease right of use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The discount rate used to determine the commencement date present value of lease payments is typically the Company’s secured borrowing rate, as most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate. The Company’s operating lease right of use asset was $
370
million and $
573
million and the Company’s operating lease liability was $
501
million and $
694
million at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Total lease expense was $
110
million and $
146
million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, which includes operating lease expense of $
84
million and $
121
million, variable lease expense of $
22
million and $
19
million and short term lease expense of $
4
million and $
6
million. Prior to the adoption of the new lease standard, lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $
120
million. Cash paid for amounts included in operating lease liabilities was $
86
million and $
117
million for year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Operating lease right of use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations was $
40
million and $
54
million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The table below presents the maturities of lease liabilities:
|
|
Operating
|
|||
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
Leases
|
|||
|
(In millions)
|
||||
|
2021
|
$
|
|
||
|
2022
|
|
|||
|
2023
|
|
|||
|
2024
|
|
|||
|
2025
|
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
|
|||
|
Less: discount
|
|
|||
|
Total lease liabilities
|
$
|
|
||
The table below presents the weighted average remaining lease term for operating leases and weighted average discount rate used in calculating the operating lease asset and liability.
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining lease term
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
Note 10. Income Taxes
Loews Corporation and its eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Loews Corporation has entered into a separate tax allocation agreement with CNA, a majority-owned subsidiary in which its ownership exceeds
80
%.
The agreement provides that Loews Corporation will: (i) pay to CNA the amount, if any, by which Loews Corporation’s consolidated federal income tax is reduced by virtue of inclusion of CNA in Loews Corporation’s return or (ii) be paid by CNA an amount, if any, equal to the federal income tax that would have been payable by CNA if it had filed a separate consolidated return.
The agreement may be canceled by either of the parties upon
thirty days
written notice.
For 2018 through 2020, the Company participates in the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Compliance Assurance Process (“CAP”), which is a voluntary program for large corporations. Under CAP, the IRS conducted a real-time audit and worked contemporaneously with the Company to resolve any issues prior to the filing of the 2018 and 2019 tax returns. The 2018 and 2019 examinations are completed. For 2020, the Company was selected to participate in the phase of CAP reserved for taxpayers whose risk of noncompliance does not support use of IRS resources. The Company believes this approach should reduce tax-related uncertainties, if any. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company believes that any adjustments resulting from audits will not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The Company and/or its subsidiaries also file income tax returns in various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. These returns, with few exceptions, are no longer subject to examination by the various taxing authorities before 2016.
The current and deferred components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit):
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal:
|
||||||||||||
|
Current
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
State and city:
|
||||||||||||
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
The components of U.S. and foreign income before income tax and a reconciliation between the federal income tax expense at statutory rates and the actual income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax:
|
||||||||||||
|
U.S.
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Foreign
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit) at statutory rate
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Increase (decrease) in income tax expense (benefit) resulting from:
|
||||||||||||
|
Effect of the 2017 tax act
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Exempt investment income
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Foreign related tax differential
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||
|
Taxes related to domestic affiliate
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Partnership earnings not subject to taxes
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Unrecognized tax positions, settlements and adjustments relating to prior years
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
State taxes
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
As of December 31, 2020,
no
deferred taxes are required on the undistributed earnings of subsidiaries subject to tax.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding tax carryforwards and interest and penalties, is as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at January 1
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Additions for tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Additions for tax positions related to a prior year
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Reductions for tax positions related to a prior year
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Reduction due to deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
As of December 31, 2020, $
2
million of unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. The amount of related accrued interest and penalties was insignificant.
The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and tax refund claims in Income tax expense (benefit) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company recognizes penalties in Income tax expense (benefit) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Interest expense (benefit) amounts recorded by the Company were insignificant for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. Penalty amounts recorded by the Company were insignificant for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
The following table summarizes deferred tax assets and liabilities:
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
|
Insurance reserves:
|
||||||||
|
Property and casualty claim and claim adjustment expense reserves
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Unearned premium reserves
|
|
|
||||||
|
Receivables
|
|
|
||||||
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred retroactive reinsurance benefit
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
||||||
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
||||||
|
Basis differential in investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
||||||
|
Disallowed interest deduction
|
|
|||||||
|
Other
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Net unrealized gains
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Basis differential in investment in subsidiary
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Other liabilities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||
|
Net deferred tax liabilities (a)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||
| (a) |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards in foreign tax jurisdictions of $
2
million expire between
and
, and $
11
million has no expiration. Foreign tax credit carryforwards of $
8
million will expire between
and
, and $
3
million has no expiration.
Although realization of deferred tax assets is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the recognized deferred tax assets will be realized through recoupment of ordinary and capital taxes paid in prior carryback years and through future earnings, reversal of existing temporary differences and available tax planning strategies. Due to the mix of state tax jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate, as of December 31, 2020, a valuation allowance of $
13
million was recorded related primarily to state net operating losses.
Note 11. Debt
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Loews Corporation (Parent Company):
|
||||||||
|
Senior:
|
||||||||
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
CNA Financial:
|
||||||||
|
Senior:
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Boardwalk Pipelines:
|
||||||||
|
Senior:
|
||||||||
|
Variable rate revolving credit facility due
(effective interest rate of
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Finance lease obligation
|
|
|
||||||
|
Loews Hotels & Co:
|
||||||||
|
Senior debt, principally mortgages (effective interest rates approximate
|
|
|
||||||
|
Altium Packaging:
|
||||||||
|
Senior:
|
||||||||
|
Variable rate asset based lending facility due
(effective interest rate of
|
|
|||||||
|
Variable rate term loan due
(effective interest rate of
|
|
|
||||||
|
Variable rate term loan due
(effective interest rate of
|
|
|
||||||
|
Finance lease obligation
|
|
|
||||||
|
Diamond Offshore (a):
|
||||||||
|
Senior:
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Less unamortized discount and issuance costs
|
|
|
||||||
|
Debt
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
| (a) |
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Discount and
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance
|
Short Term
|
Long Term
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
Principal
|
Costs
|
Net
|
Debt
|
Debt
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loews Corporation
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
CNA Financial
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Boardwalk Pipelines
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Loews Hotels & Co
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Altium Packaging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
At December 31, 2020, the aggregate long term debt maturing in each of the next five years is approximately as follows: $
37
million in 2021, $
650
million in 2022, $
1.1
billion in 2023, $
2.0
billion in 2024, $
7
million in 2025 and $
6.4
billion thereafter. Long term debt is generally redeemable in whole or in part at the greater of the principal amount or the net present value of remaining scheduled payments discounted at the specified treasury rate plus a margin.
In May of 2020, Loews Corporation completed a public offering of $
500
million aggregate principal amount of
3.2
% senior notes due
May 15, 2030
. The proceeds of this offering are available for general corporate purposes.
CNA is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (“FHLBC”). FHLBC membership provides participants with access to additional sources of liquidity through various programs and services. As a requirement of membership in the FHLBC, CNA held $
5
million of FHLBC stock as of December 31, 2020, giving it access to approximately $
111
million of additional liquidity. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, CNA had
no
outstanding borrowings from the FHLBC.
In August of 2020, CNA completed a public offering of $
500
million aggregate principal amount of its
2.1
% senior notes due
August 15, 2030
and used the net proceeds to redeem the entire $
400
million outstanding aggregate principal balance of its
5.8
% senior notes due
August 15, 2021
and for general corporate purposes.
In 2019, CNA amended and restated its existing credit agreement with a syndicate of banks. The agreement provides a
five-year
$
250
million senior unsecured revolving credit facility which is intended to be used for general corporate purposes. At CNA’s election, the commitments under the amended and restated credit agreement may be increased from time to time up to an additional aggregate amount of $
100
million, and
two
one-year
extensions are available prior to any anniversary of the closing date, each subject to applicable consents. As of December 31, 2020, CNA had
no
outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement and was in compliance with all covenants.
In August of 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines completed a public offering of $
500
million aggregate principal amount of its
3.4
% senior notes due
February 15, 2031
. Boardwalk Pipelines used the proceeds to retire the outstanding $
440
million aggregate principal amount of its
4.5
% senior notes due 2021 in November of 2020, to fund growth capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes. Initially, the proceeds were used to reduce outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility.
Boardwalk Pipelines has a revolving credit facility having aggregate lending commitments of $
1,475
million maturing
May 26, 2022
. As of December 31, 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines had $
130
million of outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and had available $
1,345
million of available borrowing capacity. As of February 8, 2021, Boardwalk Pipelines had $
170
million of outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and had $
1,305
million of available borrowing capacity. As of December 31, 2020, Boardwalk Pipelines was in compliance with all covenants.
Certain of the hotels wholly or partially owned by Loews Hotels & Co are financed by debt facilities, with a number of different lenders. Each of the loan agreements underlying these facilities contain a variety of financial and operational covenants. As of December 31, 2020, Loews Hotels & Co was in compliance with these covenants.
On February 3, 2021, Altium Packaging issued a $
1.05
billion
seven-year
secured term loan. The term loan is a variable rate facility which bears interest at a floating rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin of
2.75
%, subject to a
0.5
% LIBOR floor. The proceeds were used to pay the outstanding principal balances of its variable rate term loans and lending facility and pay a dividend of $
200
million.
Note 12. Shareholders’ Equity
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
The tables below present the changes in AOCI by component for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020:
|
|
Net Unrealized
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gains (Losses)
|
Net Other
|
Unrealized
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
on Investments
|
Unrealized
|
Gains (Losses)
|
Pension and
|
Foreign
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
with OTTI
|
Gains (Losses)
|
on Cash Flow
|
Postretirement
|
Currency
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Losses
|
on Investments
|
Hedges
|
Benefits
|
Translation
|
Income (Loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 1, 2018, as reported
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Cumulative effect adjustment from changes in accounting standards, after tax of $
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, January 1, 2018, as adjusted
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, after tax of $
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Reclassification of (gains) losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss, after tax of $
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of Boardwalk Pipelines common units
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, after tax of $
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Reclassification of (gains) losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss, after tax of $(
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2019
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Balance, January 1, 2020 (a)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, after tax of $
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Reclassification of (gains) losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss, after tax of $(
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2020
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
| (a) |
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI shown above are reported in Net income as follows:
|
Major Category of AOCI
|
Affected Line Item
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments with an allowance for credit losses, Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments with OTTI losses and Net unrealized gains (losses) on other investments
|
Investment gains (losses)
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
|
Operating revenues and other, Interest expense and Operating expenses and other
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefits
|
Operating expenses and other
|
Common Stock Dividends
Loews Corporation declared and paid dividends of $
0.25
per share in the aggregate on its common stock in 2020, 2019 and 2018.
There are no restrictions on Loews Corporation’s retained earnings or net income with regard to payment of dividends. However, as a holding company, Loews Corporation relies upon invested cash balances and distributions from its subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to declare and pay any dividends to holders of its common stock. The ability of Loews Corporation’s subsidiaries to pay dividends is subject to, among other things, the availability of sufficient earnings and funds in such subsidiaries, compliance with covenants in their respective credit agreements and applicable state laws, including in the case of the insurance subsidiaries of CNA, laws and rules governing the payment of dividends by regulated insurance companies. See Note 14 for a discussion of the regulatory restrictions on CNA’s availability to pay dividends.
Treasury Stock
Loews Corporation repurchased
22.0
million,
21.5
million and
20.3
million shares of its common stock at aggregate costs of $
0.9
billion, $
1.1
billion and $
1.0
billion during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. As of December 31, 2020,
22.0
million shares were retired. The remaining shares will be retired in 2021. Upon retirement, treasury stock was eliminated through a reduction to common stock, APIC and retained earnings.
Note 13. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Disaggregation of revenues
–
Revenue from contracts with customers, other than insurance premiums, is reported as Non-insurance warranty revenue and within Operating revenues and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table presents revenues from contracts with customers disaggregated by revenue type along with the reportable segment and a reconciliation to Operating revenues and other as reported in Note 20:
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty – CNA Financial
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Transportation and storage of natural gas and NGLs and other services – Boardwalk Pipelines
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Lodging and related services – Loews Hotels & Co
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Rigid plastic packaging and recycled resin – Corporate
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Contract drilling – Diamond Offshore
(a)
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total revenues from contracts with customers
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating revenues and other
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
| (a) |
|
Receivables from contracts with customers
–
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, receivables from contracts with customers were approximately $
246
million and $
458
million and are included within Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Deferred revenue
–
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, deferred revenue resulting from contracts with customers was approximately $
4.1
billion and $
3.9
billion and is reported as Deferred non-insurance warranty revenue and within Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Approximately $
1.1
billion and $
1.0
billion of revenues recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were included in deferred revenue as of January 1, 2020 and 2019.
Contract costs
–
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had approximately $
3.1
billion and $
2.9
billion of costs to obtain contracts with customers, primarily related to CNA for amounts paid to dealers and other agents to obtain non-insurance warranty contracts, which are reported as Deferred non-insurance warranty acquisition expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, amortization expense totaled $
907
million and $
912
million is included in Non-insurance warranty expense and Operating expenses and other in the Consolidated Statement of Income. There were
no
adjustments to deferred costs recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Performance obligations
–
As of December 31, 2020, approximately $
13.4
billion of estimated operating revenues is expected to be recognized in the future related to outstanding performance obligations. The balance relates primarily to revenues for transportation and storage of natural gas and NGLs at Boardwalk Pipelines and non-insurance warranty services at CNA. Approximately $
2.4
billion will be recognized during
, $
2.0
billion in
and the remainder in following years. The actual timing of recognition may vary due to factors outside of the Company’s control.
Note 14. Statutory Accounting Practices
CNA’s insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in various jurisdictions. These subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the respective jurisdictions’ insurance regulators. Domestic prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in a variety of publications of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) as well as state laws, regulations and general administrative rules. These statutory accounting principles vary in certain respects from GAAP. In converting from statutory accounting principles to GAAP, the more significant adjustments include deferral of policy acquisition costs and the inclusion of net unrealized holding gains or losses in shareholders’ equity relating to certain fixed maturity securities.
CNA has a prescribed practice as it relates to the accounting under Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles No. 62R (“SSAP No. 62R”),
Property and Casualty Reinsurance
, paragraphs 88 and 89 in conjunction with the 2010 loss portfolio transfer with NICO which is further discussed in Note 8. The prescribed practice allows CNA to aggregate all third party A&EP reinsurance balances administered by NICO in Schedule F and to utilize the LPT as collateral for the underlying third-party reinsurance balances for purposes of calculating the statutory reinsurance penalty. This prescribed practice increased statutory capital and surplus by $
91
million at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The payment of dividends by CNA’s insurance subsidiaries without prior approval of the insurance department of each subsidiary’s domiciliary jurisdiction is generally limited by formula. Dividends in excess of these amounts are subject to prior approval by the respective insurance regulator.
Dividends from CCC are subject to the insurance holding company laws of the State of Illinois, the domiciliary state of CCC. Under these laws, ordinary dividends, or dividends that do not require prior approval by the Illinois Department of Insurance (the “Department”) are determined based on the greater of the prior year’s statutory net income or 10% of statutory surplus as of the end of the prior year, as well as the timing and amount of dividends paid in the preceding 12 months. Additionally, ordinary dividends may only be paid from earned surplus, which is calculated by removing unrealized gains from unassigned surplus. As of December 31, 2020, CCC was in a positive earned surplus position. The maximum allowable dividend CCC could pay during 2021 that would not be subject to the Department’s prior approval is $
1,070
million, less dividends paid during the preceding 12 months measured at that point in time. CCC paid dividends of $
975
million in 2020. The actual level of dividends paid in any year is determined after an assessment of available dividend capacity, holding company liquidity and cash needs as well as the impact the dividends will have on the statutory surplus of the applicable insurance company.
Combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income for the Combined Continental Casualty Companies are presented in the table below, determined in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance and/or other regulatory authorities.
|
|
Statutory Capital and Surplus
|
Statutory Net Income
|
|||
|
December 31
|
Year Ended December 31
|
||||
|
2020(a)
|
2019
|
2020(a)
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|||||
|
Combined Continental Casualty Companies
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
| (a) |
Information derived from the statutory-basis financial statements to be filed with insurance regulators.
|
CNA’s domestic insurance subsidiaries are subject to risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements. RBC is a method developed by the NAIC to determine the minimum amount of statutory capital appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations in consideration of its size and risk profile. The formula for determining the amount of RBC specifies various factors, weighted based on the perceived degree of risk, which are applied to certain financial balances and financial activity. The adequacy of a company’s actual capital is evaluated by a comparison to the RBC results, as determined by the formula. Companies below minimum RBC requirements are classified within certain levels, each of which requires specified corrective action.
The statutory capital and surplus presented above for CCC was approximately
266
% and
291
% of company action level RBC at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Company action level RBC is the level of RBC which triggers a heightened level of regulatory supervision. The statutory capital and surplus of CNA’s foreign insurance subsidiaries, which is not significant to the overall statutory capital and surplus, also met or exceeded their respective regulatory and other capital requirements.
Note 15. Benefit Plans
Pension Plans – The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit plans for eligible employees. Benefits for certain plans are determined annually based on a specified percentage of annual earnings (based on the participant’s age or years of service) and a specified interest rate (which is established annually for all participants) applied to accrued balances. The benefits for another plan which covers salaried employees are based on formulas which include, among others, years of service and average pay. The Company’s funding policy is to make contributions in accordance with applicable governmental regulatory requirements.
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans – The Company has several postretirement benefit plans covering eligible employees and retirees. Participants generally become eligible after reaching age
55
with required years of service. Actual requirements for coverage vary by plan. Benefits for retirees who were covered by bargaining agreements vary by each unit and contract. Benefits for certain retirees are in the form of a Company health care account.
Benefits for retirees reaching age
65
are generally integrated with Medicare. Other retirees, based on plan provisions, must use Medicare as their primary coverage, with the Company reimbursing a portion of the unpaid amount; or are reimbursed for the Medicare Part B premium or have no Company coverage. The benefits provided by the Company are basically health and, for certain retirees, life insurance type benefits.
The Company funds certain of these benefit plans and accrues postretirement benefits during the active service of those employees who would become eligible for such benefits when they retire. The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date for their plans.
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
||
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Interest crediting rate
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest crediting rate
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
|
|||
In determining the discount rate assumption, current market and liability information is utilized, including a discounted cash flow analysis of the pension and postretirement obligations. In particular, the basis for the discount rate selection was the yield on indices of highly rated fixed income debt securities with durations comparable to that of our plan liabilities. The yield curve was applied to expected future retirement plan payments to adjust the discount rate to reflect the cash flow characteristics of the plans. The yield curves and indices evaluated in the selection of the discount rate are comprised of high quality corporate bonds that are rated AA by an accepted rating agency.
The expected long term rate of return for plan assets is determined based on widely-accepted capital market principles, long term return analysis for global fixed income and equity markets as well as the active total return oriented portfolio management style. Long term trends are evaluated relative to market factors such as inflation, interest rates and fiscal and monetary policies, in order to assess the capital market assumptions as applied to the plan. Consideration of diversification needs and rebalancing is maintained.
Assumed health care cost trend rates:
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net periodic (benefit) cost components:
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service benefit
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Settlements and curtailments
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net periodic (benefit) cost
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations and plan assets:
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
2019
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation at January 1
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Service cost
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Plan participants’ contributions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amendments
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Benefits paid from plan assets
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Settlements and curtailments
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in plan assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at January 1
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Plan participants’ contributions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Benefits paid from plan assets
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Settlements
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Funded status
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
2020
|
2019
|
2020
|
2019
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Other assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net amount recognized
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), not yet recognized in net periodic (benefit) cost:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Prior service credit
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net actuarial loss
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net amount recognized
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Information for plans with projected and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
The benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $
3.2
billion and $
3.1
billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Changes for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include actuarial losses of $
236
million and $
300
million primarily driven by changes in the discount rate used to determine the benefit obligations.
A total return approach is employed whereby a mix of equity, limited partnerships and fixed maturity securities are used to maximize the long term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk and to manage cash flows according to plan requirements. The target allocation of plan assets is
40
% to
60
% invested in equity securities and limited partnerships, with the remainder primarily invested in fixed maturity securities. The intent of this strategy is to minimize expenses by generating investment returns that exceed the growth of the plan liabilities over the long run. Risk tolerance is established after careful consideration of the plan liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial conditions. The investment portfolios contain a diversified blend of fixed maturity, equity and short term securities. Alternative investments, including limited partnerships, are used to enhance risk adjusted long term returns while improving portfolio diversification. At December 31, 2020, $
192
million is committed to fund future capital calls from various third party limited partnership investments in exchange for an ownership interest in the related partnerships. Investment risk is monitored through annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies and quarterly investment portfolio reviews.
The table below presents the estimated future minimum benefit payments at December 31, 2020.
|
|
Other
|
|||||||
|
Pension
|
Postretirement
|
|||||||
|
Expected future benefit payments
|
Benefits
|
Benefits
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
2021
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
2022
|
|
|
||||||
|
2023
|
|
|
||||||
|
2024
|
|
|
||||||
|
2025
|
|
|
||||||
|
2026
–
2030
|
|
|
||||||
In 2021, it is expected that contributions of approximately $
20
million will be made to pension plans and $
2
million to postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans.
Pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.
|
December 31, 2020
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Plan assets at fair value:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed income mutual funds
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other assets
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total plan assets at fair value
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Plan assets at net asset value: (a)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Limited partnerships
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total plan assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Plan assets at fair value:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed income mutual funds
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total plan assets at fair value
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Plan assets at net asset value: (a)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Limited partnerships
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total plan assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
| (a) |
|
The limited partnership investments held within the plans are recorded at fair value, which represents the plans’ shares of the net asset value of each partnership, as determined by the general partner. Limited partnerships comprising
75
% and
80
% of the carrying value as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 employ hedge fund strategies that generate returns through investing in marketable securities in the public fixed income and equity markets and the remainder were primarily invested in private debt and equity. Within hedge fund strategies, approximately
69
% were equity related,
27
% pursued a multi-strategy approach and
4
% were focused on distressed investments at December 31, 2020.
For a discussion of the valuation methodologies used to measure fixed maturity securities, equities and short term investments, see Note 4.
Other postretirement benefits plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.
|
December 31, 2020
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fixed income mutual funds
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate and other bonds
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total fixed maturities
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fixed income mutual funds
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
There were no Level 3 assets at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Savings Plans – The Company has several contributory savings plans which allow employees to make regular contributions based upon a percentage of their salaries. Matching contributions are made up to specified percentages of employees’ contributions. Employer contributions to these plans amounted to $
90
million, $
102
million and $
100
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Stock-based Compensation – In 2016, shareholders approved the Loews Corporation 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2016 Loews Plan”) which replaced a previously existing plan. The aggregate number of shares of Loews Corporation common stock authorized under the 2016 Loews Plan is
6,000,000
shares, plus up to
3,000,000
shares that may be forfeited under the prior plan. The maximum number of shares of Loews Corporation common stock with respect to which awards may be granted to any individual in any calendar year is
500,000
shares. In accordance with the 2016 Loews Plan and the prior equity plan, Loews Corporation stock-based compensation consists of the following:
SARs:
SARs were granted under the prior equity plan. The exercise price per share may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Generally, SARs vest ratably over a
four-year
period and expire in
ten years
.
Time-based Restricted Stock Units:
Time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are granted under the 2016 Loews Plan and represent the right to receive
one
share of Loews Corporation common stock for each vested RSU. Generally, RSUs vest
50
% on the second anniversary of the grant date and
50
% on the third anniversary of the grant date.
Performance-based Restricted Stock Units:
Performance-based RSUs (“PSUs”) are granted under the 2016 Loews Plan and represent the right to receive
one
share of Loews Corporation common stock for each vested PSU, subject to the achievement of specified performance goals by the Company. Generally, performance-based RSUs vest, if performance goals are satisfied,
50
% on the second anniversary of the grant date and
50
% on the third anniversary of the grant date.
In 2020, Loews Corporation granted an aggregate of
219,571
RSUs and PSUs at a weighted average grant-date fair value of $
49.99
per unit.
No
RSUs were forfeited during the year.
2,062,256
SARs were outstanding at December 31, 2020 with a weighted average exercise price of $
41.65
.
The Company recognized compensation expense that decreased net income by $
37
million, $
37
million and $
35
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. Several of Loews Corporation’s subsidiaries also maintain their own stock-based compensation plans. Such amounts include Loews Corporation’s share of expense related to these plans.
Note 16. Reinsurance
CNA cedes insurance to reinsurers to limit its maximum loss, provide greater diversification of risk, minimize exposures on larger risks and to exit certain lines of business. The ceding of insurance does not discharge the primary liability of CNA. A credit exposure exists with respect to reinsurance ceded to the extent that any reinsurer is unable to meet its obligations. A collectability exposure also exists to the extent that the reinsurer disputes the liabilities assumed under reinsurance agreements. Property and casualty reinsurance coverages are tailored to the specific risk characteristics of each product line and CNA’s retained amount varies by type of coverage. Reinsurance contracts are purchased to protect specific lines of business such as property and workers’ compensation. Corporate catastrophe reinsurance is also purchased for property and workers’ compensation exposure. CNA also utilizes facultative reinsurance in certain lines. In addition, CNA assumes reinsurance, primarily through Hardy and as a member of various reinsurance pools and associations.
The following table presents the amounts receivable from reinsurers:
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Reinsurance receivables related to insurance reserves:
|
||||||||
|
Ceded claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Ceded future policy benefits
|
|
|
||||||
|
Reinsurance receivables related to paid losses
|
|
|
||||||
|
Reinsurance receivables
|
|
|
||||||
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
||||||
|
Reinsurance receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
CNA has established an allowance for doubtful accounts on voluntary reinsurance receivables which relates to both amounts already billed on ceded paid losses as well as ceded reserves that will be billed when losses are paid in the future.
The following table summarizes the outstanding amount of voluntary reinsurance receivables, gross of any collateral arrangements, by financial strength rating:
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||
|
A- to A++
|
$
|
|
||
|
B- to B++
|
|
|||
|
Insolvent
|
|
|||
|
Total voluntary reinsurance outstanding balance (a)
|
$
|
|
||
| (a) |
|
CNA attempts to mitigate its credit risk related to reinsurance by entering into reinsurance arrangements with reinsurers that have credit ratings above certain levels and by obtaining collateral. On a limited basis, CNA may enter into reinsurance agreements with reinsurers that are not rated, primarily captive reinsurers. Receivables from captive reinsurers are backed by collateral arrangements and comprise the majority of the voluntary reinsurance receivables within the B- to B++ rating distribution in the table above. The primary methods of obtaining collateral are through reinsurance trusts, letters of credit and funds withheld balances. Such collateral, limited by the balance of open recoverables, was approximately $
3.3
billion and $
3.2
billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
CNA’s largest recoverables from a single reinsurer, including ceded unearned premium reserves as of December 31, 2020 were approximately $
1.9
billion from subsidiaries of the Berkshire Hathaway Insurance Group, $
377
million from the Gateway Rivers Insurance Company and $
314
million from the Palo Verde Insurance Company. These amounts are substantially collateralized or otherwise secured. The recoverable from subsidiaries of the Berkshire Hathaway Insurance Group includes amounts related to third party reinsurance for which NICO has assumed the credit risk under the terms of the loss portfolio transfer as discussed in Note 8.
The effects of reinsurance on earned premiums are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed/
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net %
|
|
|||||
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Year Ended December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Property and casualty
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Long term care
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and casualty
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Long term care
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and casualty
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Long term care
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Included in the direct and ceded earned premiums for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are $
3.5
billion, $
3.6
billion and $
3.7
billion related to property business that is
100
% reinsured under a significant third party captive program. The third party captives that participate in this program are affiliated with the non-insurance company policyholders, therefore this program provides a means for the policyholders to self-insure this property risk. CNA receives and retains a ceding commission.
Long term care premiums are from long-duration contracts; property and casualty premiums are from short-duration contracts.
Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations are net of estimated reinsurance recoveries of $
3.2
billion, $
2.7
billion and $
2.8
billion for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, including $
2.4
billion, $
2.1
billion and $
1.9
billion related to the significant third party captive program discussed above.
Note 17. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
2020 Quarter Ended
|
Dec. 31
|
Sept. 30
|
June 30
|
March 31
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
(a) (b) (c)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Per share-basic and diluted
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
2019 Quarter Ended
|
Dec. 31
|
Sept. 30
|
June 30
|
March 31
|
||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income
(d) (e)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Per share-basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
The sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal per share amounts reported for year-to-date periods. This is due to changes in the number of weighted average shares outstanding and the effects of rounding for each period.
| (a) |
|
| (b) |
|
| (c) |
|
| (d) |
|
| (e) |
|
Note 18. Legal Proceedings
On May 25, 2018, plaintiffs Tsemach Mishal and Paul Berger (on behalf of themselves and the purported class, “Plaintiffs”) initiated a purported class action in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) against the following defendants: Boardwalk Pipelines, Boardwalk GP, LP (“General Partner”), Boardwalk GP, LLC and Boardwalk Pipelines Holding Corp. (“BPHC”) (together, “Defendants”), regarding the potential exercise by the General Partner of its right to purchase all of the issued and outstanding common units representing limited partnership interests in Boardwalk Pipelines not already owned by the General Partner or its affiliates.
On June 25, 2018, Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise and Settlement, subject to the approval of the Court (the “Proposed Settlement”). Under the terms of the Proposed Settlement, the lawsuit would be dismissed, and related claims against the Defendants would be released by the Plaintiffs, if BPHC, the sole member of the General Partner, elected to cause the General Partner to exercise its right to purchase the issued and outstanding common units of Boardwalk Pipelines pursuant to Boardwalk Pipelines’ Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (“Limited Partnership Agreement”), within a period specified by the Proposed Settlement. On June 29, 2018, the General Partner elected to exercise its right to purchase all of the issued and outstanding common units representing limited partnership interests in Boardwalk Pipelines not already owned by the General Partner or its affiliates pursuant to the Limited Partnership Agreement within the period specified by the Proposed Settlement. The transaction was completed on July 18, 2018.
On September 28, 2018, the Court denied approval of the Proposed Settlement. On February 11, 2019, a substitute verified class action complaint was filed in this proceeding. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which was heard by the Court in July of 2019. In October of 2019, the Court ruled on the motion and granted a partial dismissal, with certain aspects of the case proceeding to trial. The case is set for trial in February of 2021.
The Company and its subsidiaries also are from time to time parties to other litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While it is difficult to predict the outcome or effect of any litigation, management does not believe that the outcome of any pending litigation, including the Boardwalk Pipelines matter described above, will materially affect the Company’s results of operations or equity.
Note 19. Commitments and Contingencies
CNA Financial
CNA has provided guarantees, if the primary obligor fails to perform, to holders of structured settlement annuities issued by a previously owned subsidiary. As of December 31, 2020, the potential amount of future payments CNA could be required to pay under these guarantees was approximately $
1.7
billion, which will be paid over the lifetime of the annuitants. CNA does not believe any payment is likely under these guarantees, as CNA is the beneficiary of a trust that must be maintained at a level that approximates the discounted reserves for these annuities.
CNA recently became aware of discrepancies in the experience rating calculation of certain general liability policies. These calculation discrepancies resulted in certain policyholders being undercharged while others were overcharged. CNA has made corrections to its systems and processes to address the issue. CNA recorded a charge which reduced earned premium by $
14
million in anticipation of voluntarily issuing premium refunds in connection with policies written from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 which were overcharged. CNA has contacted regulators in states with a significant anticipated volume of premium refunds. Fines or penalties related to the foregoing are reasonably possible, but the amount of such fines, if any, cannot be estimated at this time.
Note 20. Segments
Loews Corporation has
five
reportable segments comprised of
three
individual consolidated operating subsidiaries, CNA, Boardwalk Pipelines and Loews Hotels & Co; the Corporate segment and Diamond Offshore. The Corporate segment is primarily comprised of Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries and the operations of Altium Packaging. Diamond Offshore was deconsolidated during the second quarter of 2020. See Note 2 for further information on the deconsolidation of Diamond Offshore. Each of the operating subsidiaries and Diamond Offshore are headed by a chief executive officer who is responsible for the operation of its business and has the duties and authority commensurate with that position.
CNA’s business is the sale of property and casualty insurance coverage primarily through a network of independent agents, brokers and managing general underwriters. CNA’s operations also include its long term care business that is in run-off, certain corporate expenses, including interest on CNA’s corporate debt, and certain property and casualty businesses in run-off, including CNA Re and A&EP.
Boardwalk Pipelines is engaged in the interstate transportation and storage of natural gas and NGLs. This segment consists of interstate natural gas pipeline systems located in the Gulf Coast region, Oklahoma, Arkansas and the midwestern states of Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio, natural gas storage facilities in
four
states and NGL pipelines and storage facilities in Louisiana and Texas, with approximately
14,095
miles of pipeline.
Loews Hotels & Co operates a chain of
27
hotels,
26
of which are in the United States and
one
of which is in Canada.
The Corporate segment consists of investment income from the Parent Company’s cash and investments, Parent Company interest expense, other unallocated Parent Company expenses and the results of Altium Packaging. Purchase accounting adjustments have been pushed down to the appropriate subsidiary.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1.
In the following tables certain financial measures are presented to provide information used by management to monitor the Company’s operating performance. These schedules present the reportable segments of the Company and their contribution to the consolidated financial statements. Amounts presented will not necessarily be the same as those in the individual financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries due to adjustments for purchase accounting, income taxes and noncontrolling interests.
Statements of Operations and Total assets by segment are presented in the following tables.
|
|
CNA
|
Boardwalk
|
Loews
|
Diamond
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended December 31, 2020
|
Financial
|
Pipelines
|
Hotels & Co
|
Corporate
|
Offshore (a)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance premiums
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment losses
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty revenue
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating revenues and other
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty expense
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
December 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
CNA
|
Boardwalk
|
Loews
|
Diamond
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
Financial
|
Pipelines
|
Hotels & Co
|
Corporate
|
Offshore (a)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance premiums
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Investment gains
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty revenue
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating revenues and other
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty expense
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
|
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
CNA
|
Boardwalk
|
Loews
|
Diamond
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
Financial
|
Pipelines
|
Hotels & Co
|
Corporate
|
Offshore (a)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance premiums
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Investment losses
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty revenue
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating revenues and other
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-insurance warranty expense
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
||||||||||
| (a) |
|
Note 21. Subsequent Event
On December 30, 2020, CNA entered into an agreement with Cavello Bay Reinsurance Limited (“Cavello”), a subsidiary of Enstar Group Limited, under which Cavello reinsured a legacy portfolio of excess workers’ compensation policies. The transaction closed on February 5, 2021. Under the terms of the transaction, based on reserves in place as of January 1, 2020, and adjusted for any subsequent claim activity, CNA ceded to Cavello approximately $
690
million of net excess workers’ compensation liabilities relating to business written in 2007 and prior under a retroactive reinsurance agreement with an aggregate limit of $
1
billion. A loss of approximately $
11
million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) will be recognized in the first quarter of 2021.
None.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), which is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, including this Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer (“CEO”) and principal financial officer (“CFO”) conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2020.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the implementing rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company included a report of management’s assessment of the design and effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. The independent registered public accounting firm of the Company also reported on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. Management’s report and the independent registered public accounting firm’s report are included under Item 8 of this Report under the captions entitled “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected or that are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
None.
Information about our executive officers is reported under the caption “Information about our Executive Officers” in Part I of this Report.
We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. This Code can be found on our website at www.loews.com and is available in print to any shareholder who requests a copy by writing to our Corporate Secretary at Loews Corporation, 667 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10065-8087. We intend to post any changes to or waivers of this Code for our directors and executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions, on our website. Any amendment to this Code and any waiver applicable to our executive officers or senior financial officers will be posted on our website within the time period required by the SEC and New York Stock Exchange.
Additional information required by this Item can be found in our Proxy Statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2020 (the “2021 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this item can be found in our 2021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Information about securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans can be found under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” under Item 5 of this Report.
Additional information required by this item can be found in our 2021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this Item can be found in our 2021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this Item can be found in our 2021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
(a) 1. Financial Statements:
The financial statements appear under Item 8. The following additional financial data should be read in conjunction with those financial statements. Schedules not included with these additional financial data have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Page
|
|
Number
|
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules:
|
|
|
Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries:
|
|
|
Schedule I–Condensed financial information of Registrant as of December 31, 2020 and 2019
and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
|
170
|
|
Schedule V–Supplemental information concerning property and casualty insurance operations as of
December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
|
172
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Description
|
Number
|
|
|
3. Exhibits:
|
||
|
(3)
|
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
|
|
|
3.01
|
||
|
3.02
|
||
|
(4)
|
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
|
|
|
4.01
|
||
|
Registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request copies of instruments with respect to long term debt, pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K
|
4.02
|
|
|
(10)
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
10.01
+
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
||
|
Description
|
Number
|
||
|
10.02
+
|
|||
|
10.03
+
|
|||
|
10.04
+
|
|||
|
10.05
+
|
|||
|
10.06
+
|
|||
|
10.07
+
|
|||
|
10.08+
|
|||
|
10.09
+
|
|||
|
10.10
+
|
|||
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Description
|
Number
|
|
|
10.11
+
|
||
|
10.12+
|
||
|
10.13+
|
||
|
10.14+
|
||
|
10.15
+
|
||
|
10.16
+
|
||
|
10.17+
|
||
|
10.18
+
|
||
|
10.19
+
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Description
|
Number
|
|
|
(21)
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
21.01*
|
||
|
(23)
|
Consent of Experts and Counsel
|
|
|
23.01*
|
||
|
(24)
|
24.01*
|
|
|
(31)
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
|
|
|
31.01*
|
||
|
31.02*
|
||
|
(32)
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
32.01*
|
||
|
32.02*
|
||
|
(101)
|
XBRL Related Documents
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
|
101.INS*
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
101.SCH*
|
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
101.CAL*
|
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
101.DEF*
|
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase
|
101.LAB*
|
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
101.PRE*
|
|
|
(104)
|
(Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
|
104*
|
|
*
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
+
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
Not included.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
LOEWS CORPORATION
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
/s/ David B. Edelson
|
|
(David B. Edelson, Senior Vice President and
|
|||
|
Chief Financial Officer)
|
|||
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(James S. Tisch, President,
|
|||
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(David B. Edelson, Senior Vice President and
|
|||
|
Chief Financial Officer)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Mark S. Schwartz, Vice President,
|
|||
|
Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Ann E. Berman, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Joseph L. Bower, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Charles D. Davidson, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Charles M. Diker, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Paul J. Fribourg, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Walter L. Harris, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Philip A. Laskawy, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Susan P. Peters, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Andrew H. Tisch, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Jonathan M. Tisch, Director)
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
February 9, 2021
|
By
|
*
|
|
(Anthony Welters, Director)
|
|||
|
*By:
|
/s/ Marc A. Alpert
|
||
|
(Marc A. Alpert, Senior Vice President, General
|
|||
|
Counsel and Secretary)
|
|||
|
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|||
SCHEDULE I
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
LOEWS CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Current assets, principally investment in short term instruments
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Investments in securities
|
|
|
||||||
|
Investments in capital stocks of subsidiaries, at equity
|
|
|
||||||
|
Other assets
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred income tax and other
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
||||||
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries
(a)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Net investment income (loss), interest and other
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Investment loss
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Administrative
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Equity in other comprehensive income (loss) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
||||
SCHEDULE I
(Continued)
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
LOEWS CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(
|
)
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Equity method investees
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Loss on deconsolidation
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
(
|
)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:
|
||||||||||||
|
Receivables
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||
|
Trading securities
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|
|||||||
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries
|
(
|
)
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Change in investments, primarily short term
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Purchase of Boardwalk Pipelines common units
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Other
|
(
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Dividends paid
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Purchases of treasury shares
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Issuance of debt
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net change in cash
|
|
(
|
)
|
|
||||||||
|
Cash, beginning of year
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Cash, end of year
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
| (a) |
|
SCHEDULE V
LOEWS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Supplemental Information Concerning Property and Casualty Insurance Operations
|
Consolidated Property and Casualty Operations
|
||||||||
|
December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||
|
Reserves for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
|
|
||||||
|
Discount deducted from claim and claim adjustment expense reserves above (based on interest rates ranging from
|
|
|
||||||
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
||||||
|
Year Ended December 31
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net written premiums
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
||||||
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses related to current year
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses related to prior years
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
(
|
)
|
||||||
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Paid claim and claim adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
172
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IprintItem 1. BusinessprintItem 1A. Risk FactorsprintItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsprintItem 2. PropertiesprintItem 3. Legal ProceedingsprintItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresprintPart IIprintItem 5. Market For The Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesprintItem 6. Selected Financial DataprintItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsprintItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskprintItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataprintNote 1. Summary Of Significant Accounting PoliciesprintNote 2. Acquisitions, Divestitures and DeconsolidationprintNote 3. InvestmentsprintNote 4. Fair ValueprintNote 5. ReceivablesprintNote 6. Property, Plant and EquipmentprintNote 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsprintNote 8. Claim, Claim Adjustment Expense and Future Policy Benefit ReservesprintNote 9. LeasesprintNote 10. Income TaxesprintNote 11. DebtprintNote 12. Shareholders EquityprintNote 13. Revenue From Contracts with CustomersprintNote 14. Statutory Accounting PracticesprintNote 15. Benefit PlansprintNote 16. ReinsuranceprintNote 17. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)printNote 18. Legal ProceedingsprintNote 19. Commitments and ContingenciesprintNote 20. SegmentsprintNote 21. Subsequent EventprintItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureprintItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresprintItem 9B. Other InformationprintPart IIIprintItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceprintItem 11. Executive CompensationprintItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersprintItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceprintItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesprintPart IVprintItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesprintItem 16. Form 10-k Summaryprint