LEN 10-Q Quarterly Report May 31, 2010 | Alphaminr

LEN 10-Q Quarter ended May 31, 2010

LENNAR CORP /NEW/
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2025
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2024
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2023
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2022
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2021
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2020
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2019
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2018
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2017
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2016
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2015
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2014
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2013
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2012
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2011
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2010
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2009
PROXIES
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 28, 2025
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 29, 2024
DEF 14A
Filed on March 1, 2023
DEF 14A
Filed on March 1, 2022
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 25, 2021
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 26, 2020
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 28, 2019
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 28, 2018
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2017
DEF 14A
Filed on March 2, 2016
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 24, 2015
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 27, 2014
DEF 14A
Filed on March 1, 2013
DEF 14A
Filed on March 2, 2012
DEF 14A
Filed on March 3, 2011
DEF 14A
Filed on March 4, 2010
10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010

Commission File Number: 1-11749

Lennar Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 95-4337490

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

700 Northwest 107th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(305) 559-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES ¨ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES ¨ NO x

Common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2010:

Class A

153,650,497

Class B

31,291,294


Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

May 31,
2010 (1)
November 30,
2009 (1)

ASSETS

Lennar Homebuilding:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 1,087,698 1,330,603

Restricted cash

134,929 9,225

Income tax receivables

11,769 334,428

Receivables, net

62,178 122,053

Inventories:

Finished homes and construction in progress

1,604,258 1,503,346

Land under development

2,082,505 1,990,430

Consolidated inventory not owned

475,371 594,213

Total inventories

4,162,134 4,087,989

Investments in unconsolidated entities

609,653 599,266

Other assets

299,726 263,803
6,368,087 6,747,367

Rialto Investments:

Cash and cash equivalents

62,932

Defeasance cash to retire notes payable

33,723

Loans receivable

1,192,002

Investments in unconsolidated entities

65,176 9,874

Other assets

22,581
1,376,414 9,874

Lennar Financial Services

504,379 557,550

Total assets

$ 8,248,880 7,314,791

(1) As a result of the adoption of certain provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, Consolidations , (“ASC 810”) the Company is required to separately disclose on its condensed consolidated balance sheets the assets of consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) that are owned by the consolidated VIEs and non-recourse liabilities of consolidated VIEs.

As of May 31, 2010, total assets include $2,137.7 million related to consolidated VIEs of which $61.8 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents, $0.1 million in Lennar Homebuilding restricted cash, $6.4 million in Lennar Homebuilding receivables, net, $236.6 million in Lennar Homebuilding finished homes and construction in progress, $334.2 million in Lennar Homebuilding land under development, $36.9 million in Lennar Homebuilding investments in unconsolidated entities, $154.3 million in Lennar Homebuilding other assets, $61.5 million in Rialto Investments cash and cash equivalents, $33.7 million in Rialto Investments defeasance cash to retire notes payable, $1,192.0 million in Rialto Investments loans receivable and $20.2 million in Rialto Investments other assets.

As of November 30, 2009, total assets include $819.3 million related to consolidated VIEs of which $25.9 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents, $1.5 million in Lennar Homebuilding restricted cash, $5.5 million in Lennar Homebuilding receivables, net, $253.2 million in Lennar Homebuilding finished homes and construction in progress, $341.0 million in Lennar Homebuilding land under development, $35.3 million in Lennar Homebuilding investments in unconsolidated entities and $156.9 million in Lennar Homebuilding other assets.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — (Continued)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

May 31,
2010 (2)
November 30,
2009 (2)

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Lennar Homebuilding:

Accounts payable

$ 173,509 169,596

Liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned

404,563 518,359

Senior notes and other debts payable

2,890,212 2,761,352

Other liabilities

781,556 862,584
4,249,840 4,311,891

Rialto Investments:

Notes payable and other liabilities

628,596

Lennar Financial Services

341,511 414,886

Total liabilities

5,219,947 4,726,777

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

Class A common stock of $0.10 par value per share; Authorized: May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009 – 300,000 shares; Issued: May 31, 2010 – 165,312 shares and November 30, 2009 – 165,155 shares

16,531 16,515

Class B common stock of $0.10 par value per share; Authorized: May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009 – 90,000 shares; Issued: May 31, 2010 – 32,971 shares and November 30, 2009 – 32,964 shares

3,297 3,296

Additional paid-in capital

2,222,715 2,208,934

Retained earnings

846,833 828,424

Treasury stock, at cost; May 31, 2010 – 11,662 Class A common shares and 1,680 Class B common shares; November 30, 2009 – 11,543 Class A common shares and 1,680 Class B common shares

(615,483 ) (613,690 )

Total stockholders’ equity

2,473,893 2,443,479

Noncontrolling interests

555,040 144,535

Total equity

3,028,933 2,588,014

Total liabilities and equity

$ 8,248,880 7,314,791

(2) As of May 31, 2010, total liabilities include $874.8 million related to consolidated VIEs of which $13.0 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding accounts payable, $186.8 million in Lennar Homebuilding senior notes and other debts payable, $47.4 million in Lennar Homebuilding other liabilities and $627.6 million in Rialto Investments notes payable and other liabilities.

As of November 30, 2009, total liabilities include $274.5 million related to consolidated VIEs of which $27.2 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding accounts payable, $187.2 million in Lennar Homebuilding senior notes and other debts payable and $60.1 million in Lennar Homebuilding other liabilities.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 705,328 805,229 1,226,104 1,334,263

Lennar Financial Services

74,536 86,624 127,901 150,653

Rialto Investments

34,617 34,918

Total revenues

814,481 891,853 1,388,923 1,484,916

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding (1)

656,689 839,275 1,158,654 1,445,834

Lennar Financial Services

60,883 70,085 115,149 133,622

Rialto Investments

19,514 465 20,917 1,021

Corporate general and administrative

22,234 29,774 44,874 57,249

Total costs and expenses

759,320 939,599 1,339,594 1,637,726

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities (2)

(1,402 ) (59,890 ) (10,296 ) (62,807 )

Other income (expense), net (3)

(253 ) (8,029 ) 13,950 (43,834 )

Other interest expense

(17,516 ) (14,493 ) (36,181 ) (26,522 )

Rialto Investments equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(436 ) (293 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

35,554 (130,158 ) 16,509 (285,973 )

Benefit (provision) for income taxes (4)

11,030 (1,547 ) 22,602 (3,395 )

Net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests)

46,584 (131,705 ) 39,111 (289,368 )

Less: Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

6,865 (6,520 ) 5,915 (8,254 )

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar

$ 39,719 (125,185 ) 33,196 (281,114 )

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.21 (0.76 ) 0.18 (1.74 )

Cash dividends per each Class A and Class B common share

$ 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.08

(1) Lennar Homebuilding costs and expenses include $5.6 million and $13.1 million, respectively, of valuation adjustments for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010; and $42.0 million and $93.2 million, respectively, of valuation adjustments for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009.
(2) Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities includes $50.1 million of valuation adjustments related to assets of unconsolidated entities in which the Company has investments, for both the three and six months ended May 31, 2009.
(3) Other income (expense), net includes $7.0 million and $44.2 million, respectively, of valuation adjustments to investments in unconsolidated entities for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009.
(4) Benefit (provision) for income taxes includes a valuation allowance of $2.0 million and $4.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010; and $44.4 million and $102.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

Six Months Ended
May 31,
2010 2009

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests)

$ 39,111 (289,368 )

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests) to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

6,350 10,163

Amortization of discount/premium on debt, net

1,179 994

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities, including $50.1 million of the Company’s share of valuation adjustments related to assets of unconsolidated entities for the six months ended May 31, 2009

10,296 62,807

Distributions of earnings from Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

772 1,739

Rialto Investments equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

293

Distributions of earnings from Rialto Investments unconsolidated entities

717

Share-based compensation expense

11,639 15,592

Gain on retirement of Lennar Homebuilding other debt

(13,617 )

Loss on retirement of Lennar Homebuilding senior notes

11,714

Valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs

14,971 137,471

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

30 (16,162 )

Decrease in receivables

389,042 235,110

(Increase) decrease in inventories, excluding valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs

(131,262 ) 225,014

Decrease in other assets

18,106 17,740

Decrease (increase) in Lennar Financial Services loans held-for-sale

12,218 (38,629 )

Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities

(96,885 ) (109,742 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

274,674 252,729

Cash flows from investing activities:

Increase in restricted cash related to cash collateralized letters of credit

(125,895 )

Net additions to operating properties and equipment

(942 ) (649 )

Investments in and contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

(58,151 ) (108,438 )

Distributions of capital from Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

12,771 3,707

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments unconsolidated entities

(56,315 ) (9,874 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments consolidated entities (net of $87.8 million cash and cash equivalents consolidated)

(177,225 )

Increase in Rialto Investments defeasance cash to retire notes payable

(33,723 )

Decrease in Lennar Financial Services loans held-for-investment

1,393 2,843

Purchases of investment securities

(5,726 ) (84 )

Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities

619 14,579

Net cash used in investing activities

(443,194 ) (97,916 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net borrowings (repayments) under Lennar Financial Services debt

(56,500 ) 50,924

Proceeds from 6.95% senior notes due 2018

247,323

Debt issuance costs of 6.95% senior notes due 2018

(3,438 )

Proceeds from 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

276,500

Debt issuance costs of 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

(5,347 )

Partial redemption of 5.125% senior notes due 2010

(152,710 )

Partial redemption of 5.95% senior notes due 2011

(137,973 )

4


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — (Continued)

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

Six Months Ended
May 31,
2010 2009

Partial redemption of 5.95% senior notes due 2013

$ (84,738 )

Proceeds from 12.25% senior notes due 2017

392,392

Debt issuance costs of 12.25% senior notes due 2017

(5,500 )

Redemption of 7 5 / 8 % senior notes due 2009

(281,477 )

Proceeds from other borrowings

3,926 15,788

Principal payments on other borrowings

(83,446 ) (52,597 )

Exercise of land option contracts from an unconsolidated land investment venture

(27,625 ) (8,075 )

Receipts related to noncontrolling interests

10,130 3,558

Payments related to noncontrolling interests

(3,128 ) (3,366 )

Common stock:

Issuances

1,753 123,780

Repurchases

(1,793 ) (1,075 )

Dividends

(14,787 ) (13,256 )

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(31,853 ) 221,096

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(200,373 ) 375,909

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,457,438 1,203,422

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 1,257,065 1,579,331

Summary of cash and cash equivalents:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 1,087,698 1,447,011

Lennar Financial Services

106,435 132,320

Rialto Investments

62,932
$ 1,257,065 1,579,331

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:

Non-cash contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

$ 3,322 239

Purchases of inventories financed by sellers

$ 9,714 90,080

Rialto Investments real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure

$ 2,847

Consolidations of newly formed or previously unconsolidated entities, net:

Receivables

$ 521

Loans receivable

$ 1,183,460

Inventories

$ 27,538 85,430

Investments in unconsolidated entities

$ (16,882 ) (25,585 )

Investments in consolidated entities

$ (177,225 )

Other assets

$ 64,377 4,325

Debts payable and other liabilities

$ (683,680 ) (64,744 )

Noncontrolling interests

$ (397,588 ) 53

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

Basis of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lennar Corporation and all subsidiaries, partnerships and other entities in which Lennar Corporation has a controlling interest and VIEs (see Note 15) in which Lennar Corporation is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (the “Company”). The Company’s investments in both unconsolidated entities in which a significant, but less than controlling, interest is held and in VIEs in which the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, are accounted for by the equity method. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2009 filed on Form 8-K dated April 26, 2010. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been made.

The Company has historically experienced, and expects to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. The condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

On December 1, 2009, the Company adopted certain provisions of ASC 810. As required by these provisions, the presentation of noncontrolling interests, previously referred to as minority interests, has been changed on the condensed consolidated balance sheets to be reflected as a component of total equity and on the condensed consolidated statements of operations to separately disclose the amount of net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar and the noncontrolling interests. In addition, the Company has also presented the changes in equity attributable to both Lennar Corporation and the noncontrolling interests of its subsidiaries (see Note 4).

In addition, on December 1, 2009, the Company also adopted other provisions of ASC 810 that amended the consolidation guidance applicable to VIEs and the definition of a VIE, and require enhanced disclosures to provide more information about an enterprise’s involvement in a VIE. ASC 810 also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The adoption of these provisions resulted in certain additional disclosures and in the deconsolidation of certain option contracts totaling $75.5 million, previously included in the Company’s consolidated inventory not owned in its condensed consolidated balance sheets (see Note 15).

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2010 presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the Company’s results of operations. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, the Company included other interest expense as a component of other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. In 2010, the Company separately disclosed other interest expense in its condensed consolidated statements of operations and reclassified prior year amounts to conform with the 2010 presentation. In addition, as a result of the Company’s new reportable segment, Rialto Investments, the Company reclassified certain prior year amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements to conform with the 2010 presentation.

6


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(2) Operating and Reporting Segments

The Company’s operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments, based primarily upon similar economic characteristics, geography and product type. The Company’s reportable segments consist of:

(1) Homebuilding East

(2) Homebuilding Central

(3) Homebuilding West

(4) Homebuilding Houston

(5) Lennar Financial Services

(6) Rialto Investments

Information about homebuilding activities in states which are not economically similar to other states in the same geographic area is grouped under “Homebuilding Other,” which is not considered a reportable segment.

The Rialto Investments (“Rialto”) segment is a new reportable segment that met the reportable segment criteria set forth in GAAP beginning in the first quarter of 2010. All prior year segment information has been restated to conform with the 2010 presentation. The change had no effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, except for certain reclassifications (see Note 1). Rialto focuses on commercial and residential real estate opportunities arising from dislocations in the United States real estate markets and the eventual restructure and recapitalization of those markets.

Evaluation of segment performance is based primarily on operating earnings (loss) before income taxes. Operations of the Company’s homebuilding segments primarily include the construction and sale of single-family attached and detached homes, and to a lesser extent, multi-level residential buildings, as well as the purchase, development and sale of residential land directly and through the Company’s unconsolidated entities. Operating earnings (loss) for the homebuilding segments consist of revenues generated from the sales of homes and land, equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities and other income (expense), net, less the cost of homes and land sold, selling, general and administrative expenses and other interest expense of the segment. The Company’s reportable homebuilding segments, and all other homebuilding operations not required to be reported separately, have divisions located in:

East: Florida, Maryland, New Jersey and Virginia

Central: Arizona, Colorado and Texas (1)

West: California and Nevada

Houston: Houston, Texas

Other: Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina and South Carolina

(1) Texas in the Central reportable segment excludes Houston, Texas, which is its own reportable segment.

Operations of the Lennar Financial Services segment include primarily mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services for both buyers of the Company’s homes and others. Substantially all of the loans the Lennar Financial Services segment originates are sold in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis; although, the Company remains liable for certain limited representations and warranties related to loan sales. Lennar Financial Services operating earnings consist of revenues generated primarily from mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services, less the cost

7


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

-of such services and certain selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by the segment. The Lennar Financial Services segment operates primarily in the same states as the Company’s homebuilding operations, as well as in other states.

Operations of the Rialto segment include sourcing, underwriting, pricing, managing, turning around and ultimately monetizing real estate assets, as well as providing similar services to others in markets across the country. Rialto Investments operating earnings (loss) consists of revenues generated primarily from accretable interest income associated with the portfolios of real estate loans acquired in partnership with the FDIC, fees for sub-advisory services and equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities, less the costs incurred by the segment for managing the portfolios and providing advisory services.

Each reportable segment follows the same accounting principles described in Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2009 filed on Form 8-K dated April 26, 2010. In addition, the Rialto Investments reportable segment also follows the accounting policies identified in Section 4 of Item 2 of this Form 10-Q, “Critical Accounting Policies.” Operational results of each segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the segment been an independent stand alone entity during the periods presented.

Financial information relating to the Company’s operations was as follows:

(In thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Assets:

Homebuilding East

$ 1,520,175 1,469,671

Homebuilding Central

717,251 703,669

Homebuilding West

1,998,977 1,986,558

Homebuilding Houston

228,398 214,706

Homebuilding Other

750,221 756,068

Rialto Investments (1)

1,376,414 9,874

Lennar Financial Services

504,379 557,550

Corporate and unallocated

1,153,065 1,616,695

Total assets

$ 8,248,880 7,314,791

(1) Consists primarily of assets of consolidated VIEs (see Note 8).

8


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues:

Homebuilding East

$ 223,887 229,047 365,947 409,745

Homebuilding Central

101,871 92,589 167,954 155,298

Homebuilding West

179,267 277,717 343,584 418,943

Homebuilding Houston

103,286 116,876 179,080 197,904

Homebuilding Other

97,017 89,000 169,539 152,373

Lennar Financial Services

74,536 86,624 127,901 150,653

Rialto Investments

34,617 34,918

Total revenues (1)

$ 814,481 891,853 1,388,923 1,484,916

Operating earnings (loss):

Homebuilding East

$ 15,735 (1,204 ) 36,258 (33,496 )

Homebuilding Central

(456 ) (18,577 ) (7,703 ) (45,223 )

Homebuilding West

1,664 (90,551 ) (6,228 ) (149,881 )

Homebuilding Houston

9,187 6,217 14,641 6,432

Homebuilding Other

3,338 (12,343 ) (2,045 ) (22,566 )

Lennar Financial Services

13,653 16,539 12,752 17,031

Rialto Investments

14,667 (465 ) 13,708 (1,021 )

Total operating earnings (loss)

57,788 (100,384 ) 61,383 (228,724 )

Corporate and unallocated

(22,234 ) (29,774 ) (44,874 ) (57,249 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

$ 35,554 (130,158 ) 16,509 (285,973 )

(1) Total revenues are net of sales incentives of $90.4 million ($31,100 per home delivered) and $164.1 million ($33,600 per home delivered), respectively, for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to $165.2 million ($52,600 per home delivered) and $273.1 million ($51,800 per home delivered), respectively, for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009.

9


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Valuation adjustments and write-offs relating to the Company’s operations were as follows:

(In thousands) Three Months Ended
May  31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009

Valuation adjustments to finished homes, CIP and land on which the Company intends to build homes:

East

$ 2,467 8,793 2,764 22,271

Central

191 2,173 1,290 10,254

West

1,924 15,626 2,613 34,024

Houston

40 97 100 243

Other

420 7,869 4,344 8,546

Total

5,042 34,558 11,111 75,338

Valuation adjustments to land the Company intends to sell or has sold to third parties:

East

45 1,978 45 2,117

Central

446 1,100 1,780 1,178

West

116 2,528 116 2,528

Total

607 5,606 1,941 5,823

Write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs:

East

5,780

Central

82

West

1,188 1,703

Houston

721

Other

653 3,786

Total

1,841 12,072

Company’s share of valuation adjustments related to assets of unconsolidated entities:

East

251 251

Central

854 854

West

48,945 1,216 48,945

Total

50,050 1,216 50,050

Valuation adjustments to investments in unconsolidated entities:

East

401 401 2,566

Central

4,537 12,155

West

2,476 28,026

Other

1,491

Total

401 7,013 401 44,238

Write-offs of other receivables:

Other

1,518

Total

1,518

Total valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs and other receivables

$ 6,050 99,068 16,187 187,521

The Company recorded significantly lower valuation adjustments during the three and six months ended May 31, 2010. Up until the expiration of the Federal homebuyer tax credit at the end of April, demand trends in the communities in which the Company is selling homes indicated that the market may be stabilizing and that homebuyers are more confident and are taking advantage of increased affordability resulting from lower home prices, historically low interest rates and government stimulus programs despite a high unemployment rate, foreclosures and tight credit standards. If these trends do not continue and there is further deterioration in the homebuilding market, it may cause additional pricing pressures and slower absorption.

10


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

This may potentially lead to additional valuation adjustments in the future. In addition, market conditions may cause the Company to re-evaluate its strategy regarding certain assets that could result in further valuation adjustments and/or additional write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs due to abandonment of those options contracts.

(3) Lennar Homebuilding Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method was as follows:

Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues

$ 42,768 53,460 99,523 119,243

Costs and expenses

68,820 580,167 148,000 695,365

Net loss of unconsolidated entities (1)

$ (26,052 ) (526,707 ) (48,477 ) (576,122 )

The Company’s share of net loss recognized

$ (1,402 ) (59,890 ) (10,296 ) (62,807 )

(1) The net loss of unconsolidated entities for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 was primarily related to valuation adjustments recorded by the unconsolidated entities. The Company’s exposure to such losses was significantly lower as a result of its small ownership interest in the respective unconsolidated entities or its previous valuation adjustments to its investments in unconsolidated entities.

Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands)

May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 118,942 171,946

Inventories

3,581,140 3,628,491

Other assets

300,914 403,383
$ 4,000,996 4,203,820

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 325,064 366,141

Debt

1,438,161 1,588,390

Equity of:

The Company

609,653 599,266

Others

1,628,118 1,650,023

Total equity of unconsolidated entities

2,237,771 2,249,289
$ 4,000,996 4,203,820

The Company’s equity in its unconsolidated entities

27 % 27 %

In fiscal 2007, the Company sold a portfolio of land to a strategic land investment venture with Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., an affiliate of Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., in which the Company has a 20% ownership interest and 50% voting rights. Due to the Company’s continuing involvement, the transaction did not qualify as a sale by the Company under GAAP; thus, the inventory has remained on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet in consolidated inventory not owned. As of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, the portfolio of land (including land development costs) of $452.1 million and $477.9 million, respectively, is reflected as inventory in the summarized condensed financial information related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities.

The Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which the Company has investments usually finance their activities with a combination of partner equity and debt financing. In some instances, the Company and its partners have guaranteed debt of certain unconsolidated entities.

11


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

The summary of the Company’s net recourse exposure related to the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which the Company has investments was as follows:

(In thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Several recourse debt – repayment

$ 37,316 42,691

Several recourse debt – maintenance

49,769 75,238

Joint and several recourse debt – repayment

75,017 85,799

Joint and several recourse debt – maintenance

71,592 81,592

Land seller debt and other debt recourse exposure

2,420

The Company’s maximum recourse exposure

233,694 287,740

Less: joint and several reimbursement agreements with the Company’s partners

(87,757 ) (93,185 )

The Company’s net recourse exposure

$ 145,937 194,555

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company reduced its maximum recourse exposure related to indebtedness of Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities by $54.0 million, of which $32.0 million was paid by the Company and $22.0 million related to the reduction of joint ventures, the reduction of joint and several recourse debt and the joint ventures selling inventory. As of May 31, 2010, the Company had $13.1 million of obligation guarantees recorded as a liability on its condensed consolidated balance sheet. The obligation guarantees are estimated based on current facts and circumstances and any unexpected changes may lead the Company to incur additional liabilities under its obligation guarantees in the future.

The recourse debt exposure in the previous table represents the Company’s maximum recourse exposure to loss from guarantees and does not take into account the underlying value of the collateral or the other assets of the borrowers that are available to repay the debt or to reimburse the Company for any payments on its guarantees. The Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities that have recourse debt have a significant amount of assets and equity. The summarized balance sheets of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities with recourse debt were as follows:

(In thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Assets

$ 1,095,862 1,324,993

Liabilities

638,937 777,836

Equity

456,925 547,157

In addition, in most instances in which the Company has guaranteed debt of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity, the Company’s partners have also guaranteed that debt and are required to contribute their share of the guarantee payment. Some of the Company’s guarantees are repayment guarantees and some are maintenance guarantees. In a repayment guarantee, the Company and its venture partners guarantee repayment of a portion or all of the debt in the event of a default before the lender would have to exercise its rights against the collateral. In the event of default, if the Company’s venture partner does not have adequate financial resources to meet its obligations under the reimbursement agreement, the Company may be liable for more than its proportionate share, up to its maximum recourse exposure, which is the full amount covered by the joint and several guarantee. The maintenance guarantees only apply if the value of the collateral (generally land and improvements) is less than a specified percentage of the loan balance. If the Company is required to make a payment under a maintenance guarantee to bring the value of the collateral above the specified percentage of the loan balance, the payment would constitute a capital contribution or loan to the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity and increase the Company’s share of any funds the unconsolidated entity distributes.

In many of the loans to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, the Company and its joint venture partners (or entities related to them) have been required to give guarantees of completion to the lenders. Those completion guarantees may require that the guarantors complete the construction of the improvements for which the financing was obtained. If the construction is to be done in phases, very often the guarantee is to complete only the phases as to which construction has already commenced and for

12


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

which loan proceeds were used.

During the three months ended May 31, 2010, there were payments of $5.0 million under the Company’s maintenance guarantees and there were other loan paydowns of $21.1 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under the Company’s repayment guarantees. During the three months ended May 31, 2009, there were payments of $18.0 million under the Company’s maintenance guarantees and there were other loan repayments of $19.7 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under the Company’s repayment guarantees. During the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no payments under completion guarantees.

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, there were payments of $5.0 million under the Company’s maintenance guarantees and there were other loan paydowns of $27.0 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under the Company’s repayment guarantees. During the six months ended May 31, 2009, there were payments of $18.0 million under the Company’s maintenance guarantees and there were other loan repayments of $38.5 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under the Company’s repayment guarantees. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, there were no payments under completion guarantees. During the six months ended May 31, 2009, there was a payment of $5.6 million under a completion guarantee related to one joint venture. Payments made under guarantees are recorded primarily as contributions to the Company’s Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities.

As of May 31, 2010, the fair values of the maintenance guarantees, completion guarantees and repayment guarantees were not material. The Company believes that as of May 31, 2010, in the event it becomes legally obligated to perform under a guarantee of the obligation of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity due to a triggering event under a guarantee, most of the time the collateral should be sufficient to repay at least a significant portion of the obligation or the Company and its partners would contribute additional capital into the venture.

In certain instances, the Company has placed performance letters of credit and surety bonds with municipalities for its joint ventures (see Note 11).

The total debt of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which the Company has investments was as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

The Company’s net recourse exposure

$ 145,937 194,555

Reimbursement agreements from partners

87,757 93,185

The Company’s maximum recourse exposure

$ 233,694 287,740

Non-recourse bank debt and other debt (partners’ share of several recourse)

$ 104,482 140,078

Non-recourse land seller debt or other debt

46,604 47,478

Non-recourse bank debt with completion guarantees

607,876 608,397

Non-recourse bank debt without completion guarantees

445,505 504,697

Non-recourse debt to the Company

1,204,467 1,300,650

Total debt

$ 1,438,161 1,588,390

The Company’s maximum recourse exposure as a % of total JV debt

16 % 18 %

13


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(unaudited)

(4) Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table reflects the changes in equity attributable to both Lennar Corporation and the noncontrolling interests of its consolidated subsidiaries in which it has less than a 100% ownership interest for both the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009:

Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands) Total
Equity
Class A
Common Stock
Class B
Common Stock
Additional Paid
in Capital
Treasury
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Noncontrolling
Interests

Balance at November 30, 2009

$ 2,588,014 16,515 3,296 2,208,934 (613,690 ) 828,424 144,535

Net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests)

39,111 33,196 5,915

Employee stock and directors plans

3,878 16 1 5,654 (1,793 )

Amortization of restricted stock

8,127 8,127

Cash dividends

(14,787 ) (14,787 )

Receipts related to noncontrolling interests

10,130 10,130

Payments related to noncontrolling interests

(3,128 ) (3,128 )

Rialto Investments non-cash consolidations

397,588 397,588

Balance at May 31, 2010

$ 3,028,933 16,531 3,297 2,222,715 (615,483 ) 846,833 555,040
Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands) Total
Equity
Class A
Common Stock
Class B
Common Stock
Additional Paid
in Capital
Treasury
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Noncontrolling
Interests

Balance at November 30, 2008

$ 2,788,753 14,050 3,296 1,944,626 (612,124 ) 1,273,159 165,746

Net loss (including net loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests)

(289,368 ) (281,114 ) (8,254 )

Issuance of Class A common shares

123,778 1,281 122,497

Employee stock and directors plans

19,977 207 20,845 (1,075 )

Amortization of restricted stock

9,614 9,614

Cash dividends

(13,256 ) (13,256 )

Receipts related to noncontrolling interests

3,558 3,558

Payments related to noncontrolling interests

(3,366 ) (3,366 )

Non-cash activity related to noncontrolling
interests

815 815

Balance at May 31, 2009

$ 2,640,505 15,538 3,296 2,097,582 (613,199 ) 978,789 158,499

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Lennar was the same as its net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar for both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests was the same as the net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests for both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009.

The Company has a stock repurchase program which permits the purchase of up to 20 million shares of its outstanding common stock. There were no share repurchases during both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 under the stock repurchase program. As of May 31, 2010, 6.2 million shares of common stock can be repurchased in the future under the program.

During the three months ended May 31, 2010, treasury stock increased by an immaterial amount of common shares. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, treasury stock increased by 0.1 million common shares, in connection with activity related to the Company’s equity compensation plan and forfeitures of restricted stock.

14


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(5) Income Taxes

A reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance is required, if based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed periodically based on the more-likely-than-not realization threshold criterion. In the assessment for a valuation allowance, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, the Company’s experience with loss carryforwards not expiring unused and tax planning alternatives.

Based upon an evaluation of all available evidence, during the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company recorded an additional valuation allowance of $2.0 million and $4.8 million, respectively, against the entire amount of deferred tax assets generated during the periods. At May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, the Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $652.2 million and $647.4 million, respectively. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion or all of the Company’s deferred tax assets will be realized.

At May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, the Company had $46.0 million and $77.2 million, respectively, of gross unrecognized tax benefits. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, total unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $31.2 million primarily as a result of the withdrawal of an issue by the IRS and settlements with state taxing authorities. If the Company were to recognize these tax benefits, $24.9 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.

The Company expects the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by $14.4 million within twelve months as a result of the settlement of certain tax accounting items with the IRS with respect to the prior examination cycle that carried over to the current years under examination, and as a result of the conclusion of examinations with a number of state taxing authorities. The majority of these items were previously recorded as deferred tax liabilities and the settlement will not affect the Company’s tax rate.

At May 31, 2010, the Company had $26.8 million accrued for interest and penalties, of which $1.3 million was recorded during the six months ended May 31, 2010. The accrual for interest was reduced by $8.1 million during the six months ended May 31, 2010 as a result of settlements with state taxing authorities and the withdrawal of an issue by the IRS. At November 30, 2009, the Company had $33.6 million accrued for interest and penalties.

The IRS is currently examining the Company’s federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2005 through 2009, and certain state taxing authorities are examining various fiscal years. The final outcome of these examinations is not yet determinable. The statute of limitations for the Company’s major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for fiscal years 2003 and subsequent years.

(6) Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.

Effective December 1, 2009, the Company adopted certain provisions under ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share . Under these provisions, all outstanding nonvested shares that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents that participate in undistributed earnings with common stock are considered participating securities and, therefore, are included in computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per

15


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s restricted common stock (“nonvested shares”) are considered participating securities. For the three and six months ended May 31, 2009, the nonvested shares were excluded from the calculation of the denominator for diluted loss per share because including them would be anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss during those periods. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material impact to the Company’s basic and diluted loss per share.

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share were calculated as follows:

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Numerator:

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar

$ 39,719 (125,185 ) 33,196 (281,114 )

Less: distributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares

75 50 162 113

Less: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares

336 203

Numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share

39,308 (125,235 ) 32,831 (281,227 )

Plus: interest on 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020, net of tax

252 252

Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per share

$ 39,560 (125,235 ) 33,083 (281,227 )

Denominator:

Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share – weighted average common shares outstanding

183,012 164,582 182,836 161,601

Effect of dilutive securities:

Share-based payment

443 243

2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

2,936 1,468

Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share – weighted average common shares outstanding

186,391 164,582 184,547 161,601

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.21 (0.76 ) 0.18 (1.74 )

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.21 (0.76 ) 0.18 (1.74 )

Options to purchase 1.9 million and 7.3 million shares, respectively, of common stock were outstanding and anti-dilutive for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. Options to purchase 2.2 million and 8.0 million shares, respectively, of common stock were outstanding and anti-dilutive for the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009.

16


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(7) Lennar Financial Services Segment

The assets and liabilities related to the Lennar Financial Services segment were as follows:

(In thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 106,435 126,835

Restricted cash

25,807 25,646

Receivables, net (1)

100,566 123,967

Loans held-for-sale (2)

170,201 182,706

Loans held-for-investment, net

22,466 25,131

Investments held-to-maturity

7,619 2,512

Goodwill

34,046 34,046

Other (3)

37,239 36,707
$ 504,379 557,550

Liabilities :

Notes and other debts payable

$ 161,057 217,557

Other (4)

180,454 197,329
$ 341,511 414,886

(1) Receivables, net primarily relate to loans sold to investors for which the Company had not yet been paid as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively.
(2) Loans held-for-sale relate to unsold loans carried at fair value.
(3) Other assets include mortgage loan commitments carried at fair value of $6.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively, as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.
(4) Other liabilities include forward contracts carried at fair value of $4.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.

At May 31, 2010, the Lennar Financial Services segment had a warehouse repurchase facility that matures in July 2010 with a maximum aggregate commitment of $125 million and a warehouse repurchase facility that matured in June 2010 with a maximum aggregate commitment of $200 million. In addition, at May 31, 2010, the Lennar Financial Services segment had a warehouse repurchase facility that was renewed in May 2010 and matures in April 2011 with a maximum aggregate commitment of $100 million and an additional uncommitted amount of $100 million. At May 31, 2010, the maximum aggregate commitment under these facilities totaled $425 million.

In June 2010, the Lennar Financial Services segment amended its warehouse repurchase facility that matured in June 2010 by extending its maturity to August 2010 and reducing the maximum aggregate commitment to $100 million.

The Lennar Financial Services segment uses these facilities to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold to investors and expects the facilities to be renewed or replaced with other facilities when they mature. Borrowings under the facilities were $161.0 million and $217.5 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, and were collateralized by mortgage loans and receivables on loans sold to investors but not yet paid for with outstanding principal balances of $170.9 million and $266.9 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. If the facilities are not renewed, the borrowings under the lines of credit will be paid off by selling the mortgage loans held-for-sale to investors and by collecting on receivables on loans sold but not yet paid. Without the facilities, the Lennar Financial Services segment would have to use cash from operations and other funding sources to finance its lending activities.

17


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(8) Rialto Investments Segment

The assets and liabilities related to the Rialto segment were as follows:

(In thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 62,932

Defeasance cash to retire notes payable

33,723

Loans receivable

1,192,002

Investments in unconsolidated entities

65,176 9,874

Other

22,581
$ 1,376,414 9,874

Liabilities:

Notes payable and other liabilities

$ 628,596

Rialto’s operating earnings (loss) for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues

$ 34,617 34,918

Costs and expenses

19,514 465 20,917 1,021

Rialto Investments equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(436 ) (293 )

Operating earnings (loss) (1)

$ 14,667 (465 ) 13,708 (1,021 )

(1) Operating earnings for both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 include $9.6 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

In February 2010, the Rialto segment acquired indirectly 40% managing member equity interests in two limited liability companies (“LLCs”), in partnership with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), for approximately $243 million (net of transaction costs and a $22 million working capital reserve). The LLCs hold performing and non-performing loans formerly owned by 22 failed financial institutions. The two portfolios consist of more than 5,500 distressed residential and commercial real estate loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of approximately $3 billion and had an initial fair value of approximately $1.2 billion. The FDIC retained a 60% equity interest in the LLCs and provided $626.9 million of notes with 0% interest, which are non-recourse to the Company. In accordance with GAAP, interest has not been imputed because the notes are with, and guaranteed by, a governmental agency. The notes are secured by the loans held by the LLCs. Additionally, if the LLCs exceed expectations and meet certain internal rate of return and distribution thresholds, the Company’s equity interest in the LLCs could be reduced from 40% down to 30%, with a corresponding increase to the FDIC’s equity interest from 60% up to 70%. Although the Company’s equity interest could decrease, the Company would most likely yield a higher return on its investment. As of May 31, 2010, the notes payable balance was $626.9 million; however, during the three months ended May 31, 2010, $33.7 million of cash collections on loans in excess of expenses was deposited in a defeasance account, established solely for the repayment of the notes payable, per the agreement with the FDIC. The funds in the defeasance account will be used to retire the notes payable upon their maturity.

The LLCs met the accounting definition of VIEs and since the Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidated the LLCs. The LLCs are considered VIEs due to the FDIC’s guarantee on the $626.9 million notes payable, as well as the Company’s $10 million guarantee of servicer performance. The Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities of the LLCs that most significantly impact the LLCs’ performance through its management agreement. At May 31, 2010, these consolidated LLCs had total combined assets and liabilities of $1.3 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively.

18


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

As of May 31, 2010, all of the acquired loans for which (1) there was evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and (2) for which it was deemed probable that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required principal and interest payments were accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality , (“ASC 310-30”). For loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, management determined the value of the loan portfolio based on extensive due diligence on the loans, the underlying properties and the borrowers, as well as through various valuation methodologies. Factors considered in the valuation were projected cash flows for the loans, type of loan and related collateral, classification status and current discount rates.

Under ASC 310-30, loans were pooled together according to common risk characteristics. The excess of the cash flows expected to be collected from the loans receivable at acquisition over the initial investment for those loans receivable is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the expected life of the pools primarily using the constant effective yield method. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. Changes in the expected cash flows of loans receivable from the date of acquisition will either impact the accretable yield or result in a charge to the provision for loan losses in the period in which the changes become probable. Prepayments are treated as a reduction of cash flows expected to be collected and a reduction of contractually required payments such that the nonaccretable difference is not affected. Subsequent material decreases to the expected cash flows related to loan impairment will generally result in a charge to the provision for loan losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses, and a reclassification from accretable yield to nonaccretable difference. Subsequent increases in cash flows will result in a recovery of any previously recorded allowance for loan losses, to the extent applicable, and a reclassification from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield. Certain amounts related to the ASC 310-30 loans are estimates and may change as the Company obtains additional information related to the respective loans.

The second quarter of 2010 was the first quarter that the Company recorded accretable interest income on its loan portfolios. The accretion of interest income is based on various estimates regarding loan performance. As the Company continues to obtain additional information related to the respective loans, these estimates may change from quarter-to-quarter. Therefore, the amounts of accretable interest income recorded for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The estimate of the total contractually required payments of the loans receivable at acquisition was $3.7 billion, the cash flows expected to be collected on loans receivable being accounted for under ASC 310-30 were $1.6 billion, and the carrying amount of those loans receivable was $1.2 billion. The accretable yield related to the loans receivable at both February 9, 2010 and May 31, 2010 was $0.3 billion. During the three months ended May 31, 2010, the Rialto segment recognized $32.8 million of accretable interest income related to the loans receivable. At May 31, 2010, there were loans receivable with a carrying value of approximately $100 million for which interest income was not being recognized.

In addition to the acquisition and management of the FDIC portfolios, an affiliate in the Rialto segment is a sub-advisor to the AllianceBernstein L.P. (“AB”) fund formed under the Federal government’s Public-Private Investment Program (“PPIP”) to purchase real estate related securities from banks and other financial institutions. The sub-advisor receives management fees for sub-advisory services. The Company committed to invest $75 million of the total equity commitments of approximately $1.2 billion made by private investors in this fund, and the U.S. Treasury has committed to a matching amount of approximately $1.2 billion of equity in the fund, as well as agreed to extend up to approximately $2.3 billion of financing. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company invested $15.0 million and $56.3 million, respectively, in the AB PPIP fund. As of May 31, 2010, the Company’s investment in the AB PPIP fund was $57.8 million.

Additionally, another subsidiary in the Rialto segment also has a $7.4 million, or approximately 5%, investment in a service and infrastructure provider to the residential home loan market (the “Servicer”), which provides services to the consolidated LLCs.

19


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Rialto’s investments in unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method as of May 31, 2010 was as follows:

Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009 (1)

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 35,535 2,229

Investments

3,556,824

Other assets

193,294 179,985
$ 3,785,653 182,214

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 164,841 58,209

Partner loans

137,820 135,570

Debt

1,725,000

Equity of:

Rialto Investments

65,176 9,874

Others

1,692,816 (21,439 )

Total equity of unconsolidated entities

1,757,992 (11,565 )
$ 3,785,653 182,214

(1) Amounts included as of November 30, 2009 relate only to the Servicer because the Company did not invest in the AB PPIP fund until December 2009.

Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues

$ 87,995 16,442 119,327 21,236

Costs and expenses

65,225 26,976 74,024 35,432

Net earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities

22,770 (10,534 ) 45,303 (14,196 )

Rialto Investments’ share of net loss recognized

$ (436 ) (293 )

(9) Lennar Homebuilding Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009 included $1.8 million and $5.8 million, respectively, of cash held in escrow for approximately three days.

(10) Lennar Homebuilding Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of $125.9 million of cash used to collateralize letters of credit. Restricted cash also includes customer deposits on home sales held in restricted accounts until title transfers to the homebuyer, as required by the state and local governments in the locations in which the homes were sold.

20


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(11) Lennar Homebuilding Senior Notes and Other Debts Payable

(Dollars in thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

5.125% senior notes due 2010

$ 99,229 249,955

5.95% senior notes due 2011

113,140 244,727

5.95% senior notes due 2013

266,035 347,471

5.50% senior notes due 2014

248,509 248,365

5.60% senior notes due 2015

501,321 501,424

6.50% senior notes due 2016

249,774 249,760

12.25% senior notes due 2017

392,726 392,392

6.95% senior notes due 2018

247,323

2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

276,500

Mortgage notes on land and other debt

495,655 527,258
$ 2,890,212 2,761,352

In February 2010, the Company terminated its $1.1 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). The Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility as it was only being used to issue letters of credit. The Company entered into cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements with two banks with a capacity totaling $225 million. As of May 31, 2010, the Company had $124.6 million of cash-collateralized letters of credit.

The Company’s performance letters of credit outstanding were $78.1 million and $97.7 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. The Company’s financial letters of credit outstanding were $195.5 million and $205.4 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. Performance letters of credit are generally posted with regulatory bodies to guarantee the Company’s performance of certain development and construction activities, and financial letters of credit are generally posted in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts and for insurance risks, credit enhancements and as other collateral. Additionally, at May 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding performance and surety bonds related to site improvements at various projects (including certain projects of the Company’s joint ventures) of $777.6 million. Although significant development and construction activities have been completed related to these site improvements, these bonds are generally not released until all development and construction activities are completed. As of May 31, 2010, there were approximately $324.7 million, or 42%, of costs to complete related to these site improvements. The Company does not presently anticipate any draws upon these bonds, but if such draws occur, the Company does not believe they would have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2010, the Company issued $250 million of 6.95% senior notes due 2018 (the “6.95% Senior Notes”) at a price of 98.929% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after payment of initial purchaser’s discount and expenses, were $243.9 million. The Company used the net proceeds of the sale of the 6.95% Senior Notes to fund purchases pursuant to its tender offer for its 5.125% senior notes due October 2010, its 5.95% senior notes due 2011 and its 5.95% senior notes due 2013. Interest on the 6.95% Senior Notes is due semi-annually beginning December 1, 2010. The 6.95% Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated, and may at some time be guaranteed by some or substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries. At May 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the 6.95% Senior Notes was $247.3 million.

In May 2010, the Company issued $276.5 million of 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2.00% Convertible Senior Notes”) at a price of 100% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after payment of expenses, were $271.2 million. The net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, including repayments or repurchases of existing senior notes or other indebtedness. The 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes are convertible into shares of the Lennar Class A common stock at the initial conversion rate of 36.1827 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $27.64 per share of Class A common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. Holders of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase them for cash equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest, on each of December 1, 2013 and December 1, 2015. The

21


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Company will have the right to redeem the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes at any time on or after December 1, 2013 for 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest. Interest on the 2.00% Senior Notes is due semi-annually beginning December 1, 2010. Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing December 1, 2013, under certain circumstances based on the average trading price of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes, the Company may be required to pay contingent interest. The 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated, and may at some time be guaranteed by some or substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries. At May 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes was $276.5 million.

In May 2010, the Company repurchased $289.4 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes due 2010, 2011 and 2013 through a tender offer that ran from April 27, 2010 through May 25, 2010, resulting in a pre-tax loss of $10.8 million. Through the tender offer, the Company repurchased $76.4 million principal amount of its 5.125% senior notes due October 2010, $130.8 million of its 5.95% senior notes due 2011 and $82.3 million of its 5.95% senior notes due 2013.

In addition to the tender offer, during the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company repurchased $74.4 million principal amount of its 5.125% senior notes due October 2010 and $1.0 million principal amount of its 5.95% senior notes due 2011, resulting in a net pre-tax loss of $0.9 million. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company also retired $98.3 million of mortgage notes on land and other debt, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $13.6 million.

(12) Product Warranty

Warranty and similar reserves for homes are established at an amount estimated to be adequate to cover potential costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims expected to be incurred subsequent to the delivery of a home. Reserves are determined based on historical data and trends with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. The Company regularly monitors the warranty reserve and makes adjustments to its pre-existing warranties in order to reflect changes in trends and historical data as information becomes available. Warranty reserves are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The activity in the Company’s warranty reserve was as follows:

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Warranty reserve, beginning of period

$ 141,825 139,696 157,896 129,449

Warranties issued during the period

6,731 7,888 11,870 13,281

Adjustments to pre-existing warranties from changes in estimates

163 9,704 (739 ) 28,780

Payments

(22,255 ) (15,114 ) (42,563 ) (29,336 )

Warranty reserve, end of period

$ 126,464 142,174 126,464 142,174

As of May 31, 2010, the Company identified approximately 810 homes delivered in Florida primarily during its 2006 and 2007 fiscal years that are confirmed to have defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage. This represents a small percentage of homes the Company delivered in Florida (4.0%) and nationally (1.0%) during those fiscal years in the aggregate. Defective Chinese drywall appears to be an industry-wide issue as other homebuilders have publicly disclosed that they are experiencing similar issues with defective Chinese drywall.

Based on its efforts to date, the Company has not identified defective Chinese drywall in homes delivered by the Company outside of Florida. The Company is continuing its investigation of homes delivered during the relevant time period in order to determine whether there are additional homes, not yet inspected, with defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage. If the outcome of the Company’s inspections identifies more homes than the Company has estimated to have defective Chinese drywall, it might require an increase to the Company’s warranty reserve in the future.

22


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Through May 31, 2010, the Company has accrued $80.7 million of warranty reserves related to homes confirmed as having defective Chinese drywall, as well as an estimate for homes not yet inspected that may contain Chinese drywall. No additional amount was accrued during the three and six months ended May 31, 2010. As of May 31, 2010, the warranty reserve, net of payments, was $37.3 million. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Company received payments of $40 million related to its receivable for covered damages under its insurance coverage relative to the costs it has incurred and expects to incur remedying the homes confirmed and estimated to have defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage. As of May 31, 2010, the Company’s insurance receivable for covered damages under its insurance coverage was $1.6 million. The Company is also seeking reimbursement from its subcontractors, insurers and others for costs the Company has incurred or expects to incur to investigate and repair defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage.

(13) Share-Based Payment

During the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, compensation expense related to the Company’s share-based payment awards was as follows:

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Stock options

$ 1,530 2,989 3,512 5,978

Nonvested shares

3,811 4,883 8,127 9,614

Total compensation expense for share-based awards

$ 5,341 7,872 11,639 15,592

During both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted an immaterial amount of stock options and did not issue any nonvested shares.

(14) Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments held by the Company at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, using available market information and what the Company believes to be appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies might have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The table excludes cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, defeasance cash to retire notes payable, receivables, net, income tax receivables and accounts payable, which had fair values approximating their carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments.

May 31, 2010 November 30, 2009
(In thousands) Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value

ASSETS

Rialto Investments:

Loans receivable

$ 1,192,002 1,192,002

Lennar Financial Services:

Loans held-for-investment, net

$ 22,466 23,566 25,131 26,818

Investments held-to-maturity

$ 7,619 7,630 2,512 2,529

LIABILITIES

Lennar Homebuilding:

Senior notes and other debts payable

$ 2,890,212 2,869,713 2,761,352 2,754,737

Rialto Investments:

Notes payable

$ 626,906 589,095

Lennar Financial Services:

Notes and other debts payable

$ 161,057 161,057 217,557 217,557

23


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

The following methods and assumptions are used by the Company in estimating fair values:

Lennar Homebuilding —For senior notes and other debts payable, the fair value of fixed-rate borrowings is based on quoted market prices. The Company’s variable-rate borrowings are tied to market indices and approximate fair value due to the short maturities associated with the majority of the instruments.

Rialto Investments —The fair value for loans receivable is based on discounted cash flows as of May 31, 2010. For notes payable, the fair value of the zero percent notes provided by the FDIC was calculated based on a 5-year treasury yield as of May 31, 2010.

Lennar Financial Services —The fair values are based on quoted market prices, if available. The fair values for instruments that do not have quoted market prices are estimated by management on the basis of discounted cash flows or other financial information.

GAAP provides a framework for measuring fair value, expands disclosures about fair value measurements and establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value summarized as follows:

Level 1: Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2: Fair value determined using significant other observable inputs.

Level 3: Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs.

The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value at May 31, 2010 on a recurring basis are all within the Lennar Financial Services segment and are summarized below:

Financial Instruments

Fair Value
Hierarchy
Fair Value at
May 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)

Loans held-for-sale (1)

Level 2 $ 170,201

Mortgage loan commitments

Level 2 $ 6,012

Forward contracts

Level 2 $ (4,094 )

(1) The aggregate fair value of loans held-for-sale of $170.2 million exceeds its aggregate principal balance of $163.9 million by $6.3 million.

The estimated fair values of the Lennar Financial Services segment financial instruments have been determined by using available market information and what the Company believes to be appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies might have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Loans held-for-sale— Fair value is based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices for other mortgage whole loans with similar characteristics.

Mortgage loan commitments— Fair value of commitments to originate loans is based upon the difference between the current value of similar loans and the price at which the Lennar Financial Services segment has committed to originate the loans. The fair value of commitments to sell loan contracts is the estimated amount that the Lennar Financial Services segment would receive or pay to terminate the commitments at the reporting date based on market prices for similar financial instruments.

Forward contracts— Fair value is based on quoted market prices for similar financial instruments.

24


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(15) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

GAAP requires the consolidation of VIEs in which an enterprise has a controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest will have both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The Company’s variable interest in VIEs may be in the form of (1) equity ownership, (2) contracts to purchase assets, (3) management and development agreements between the Company and a VIE, (4) loans provided by the Company to a VIE or other partner and/or (5) guarantees provided by members to banks and other third parties. The Company examines specific criteria and uses its judgment when determining if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions, representation on a VIE’s executive committee, existence of unilateral kick-out rights or voting rights, level of economic disproportionality between the Company and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.

Generally, all major decision making in the Company’s joint ventures is shared between all partners. In particular, business plans and budgets are generally required to be unanimously approved by all partners. Usually, management and other fees earned by the Company are nominal and believed to be at market and there is no significant economic disproportionality between the Company and other partners. Generally, the Company purchases less than a majority of the joint venture’s assets and the purchase prices under the Company’s option contracts are believed to be at market.

Generally, Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities become VIEs and consolidate when the other partner(s) lack the intent and financial wherewithal to remain in the entity. As a result, the Company continues to fund operations and debt paydowns through partner loans or substituted capital contributions.

The Company evaluated all joint venture agreements as of May 31, 2010. Based on the Company’s evaluation, there were no material entities that consolidated during the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, except for the FDIC LLCs. These LLCs are considered VIEs due to FDIC’s guarantee on the $626.9 million notes payable, as well as the Company’s $10 million guarantee of servicer performance. In addition, the Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary because it has the power to direct the activities of the LLCs that most significantly impact the LLCs’ performance through its management and servicer contracts. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, there were no VIEs that deconsolidated.

At May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, the Company’s recorded investments in Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities were $609.7 million and $599.3 million, respectively, and the Rialto Investments segment’s investments in unconsolidated entities as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009 were $65.2 million and $9.9 million, respectively.

Consolidated VIEs

As of May 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the VIEs’ assets and non-recourse liabilities that consolidated were $2,137.7 million and $874.8 million, respectively. Those assets are owned by, and those liabilities are obligations of, the VIEs, not the Company.

A VIE’s assets can only be used to settle obligations of a VIE. The VIEs are not guarantors of Company’s senior notes and other debts payable. In addition, the assets held by a VIE usually are collateral for that VIE’s debt. The Company and other partners do not generally have an obligation to make capital contributions to a VIE unless the Company and/or the other partner(s) have entered into debt guarantees with a VIE’s banks. Other than debt guarantee agreements with a VIE’s banks, there are no liquidity arrangements or agreements to fund capital or purchase assets that could require the Company to provide financial support to a VIE. While the Company has option contracts to purchase land from certain of its VIEs, the Company is not required to purchase the asset and could walk away from the contract.

25


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Unconsolidated VIEs

At May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, the Company’s recorded investments in VIEs that are unconsolidated and its estimated maximum exposure to loss were as follows:

As of May 31, 2010

(In thousands) Investments in
Unconsolidated
VIEs
Lennar’s
Maximum
Exposure to Loss

Lennar Homebuilding (1)

$ 84,934 141,975

Rialto Investments (2)

65,176 85,564

Total

$ 150,110 227,539

As of November 30, 2009

(In thousands) Investments in
Unconsolidated
VIEs
Lennar’s
Maximum
Exposure to Loss

Lennar Homebuilding (1)

$ 84,352 84,352

Rialto Investments (2)

9,874 9,874

Total

$ 94,226 94,226

(1) At May 31, 2010, the maximum exposure to loss of Lennar Homebuilding’s investments in unconsolidated VIEs is limited to its investments in the unconsolidated VIEs in addition to $56.5 million of recourse debt of one of the unconsolidated VIEs. At November 30, 2009, the maximum exposure to loss of Lennar Homebuilding’s investments in unconsolidated VIEs is limited to its investments in the unconsolidated VIEs.
(2) For Rialto’s investment in unconsolidated VIEs, the Company made a $75 million commitment to fund capital in the AB PPIP fund. As of May 31, 2010, the Company had contributed $56.3 million of the $75 million commitment and it cannot walk away from its commitment to fund capital. Therefore, as of May 31, 2010, the maximum exposure to loss for Rialto’s unconsolidated VIEs was higher than the carrying amount of its investment. At November 30, 2009, the maximum recourse exposure to loss of Rialto’s investment in unconsolidated VIEs was limited to its investments in the unconsolidated entities.

While these entities are VIEs, the Company has determined that the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance is shared. While the Company generally manages the day-to-day operations of the VIEs, the VIEs have an executive committee made up of representatives from each partner. The members of the executive committee have equal vote and major decisions require unanimous consent and approval from all members. The Company does not have the unilateral ability to exercise participating voting rights without partner consent. Furthermore, the Company’s economic interest is not significantly disproportionate to the point where it would indicate that the Company has the power to direct these activities.

The Company and other partners do not generally have an obligation to make capital contributions to the VIEs, except for the Company’s $18.7 million remaining commitment to the AB PPIP fund and $56.5 million of recourse debt of one of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated VIEs. There are no liquidity arrangements or agreements to fund capital or purchase assets that could require the Company to provide financial support to the VIEs. While the Company has option contracts to purchase land from certain of its unconsolidated VIEs, the Company is not required to purchase the asset and could walk away from the contract.

26


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Option Contracts

The Company has access to land through option contracts, which generally enables it to control portions of properties owned by third parties (including land funds) and unconsolidated entities until the Company has determined whether to exercise the option.

A majority of the Company’s option contracts require a non-refundable cash deposit or irrevocable letter of credit based on a percentage of the purchase price of the land. The Company’s option contracts sometimes include price adjustment provisions, which adjust the purchase price of the land to its approximate fair value at the time of acquisition or are based on the fair value at the time of takedown.

The Company’s investments in option contracts are recorded at cost unless those investments are determined to be impaired, in which case the Company’s investments are written down to fair value. The Company reviews option contracts for indicators of impairment during each reporting period . The most significant indicator of impairment is a decline in the fair value of the optioned property such that the purchase and development of the optioned property would no longer meet the Company’s targeted return on investment with appropriate consideration given to the length of time available to exercise the option. Such declines could be caused by a variety of factors including increased competition, decreases in demand or changes in local regulations that adversely impact the cost of development. Changes in any of these factors would cause the Company to re-evaluate the likelihood of exercising its land options.

Some option contracts contain a predetermined take-down schedule for the optioned land parcels. However, in almost all instances, the Company is not required to purchase land in accordance with those take-down schedules. In substantially all instances, the Company has the right and ability to not exercise its option and forfeit its deposit without further penalty, other than termination of the option and loss of any unapplied portion of its deposit and pre-acquisition costs. Therefore, in substantially all instances, the Company does not consider the take-down price to be a firm contractual obligation.

When the Company does not intend to exercise an option, it writes off any unapplied deposit and pre-acquisition costs associated with the option contract.

The Company evaluates all option contracts for land to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Although the Company does not have legal title to the optioned land, if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, it is required to consolidate the land under option at the purchase price of the optioned land. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the effect of consolidation of these option contracts was a net increase of $5.5 million to consolidated inventory not owned with a corresponding increase to liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010. In addition, consolidated inventory not owned decreased due (1) to the Company exercising its options to acquire land under certain contracts previously consolidated and (2) the deconsolidation of certain option contracts totaling $75.5 million related to the adoption of certain new provisions under ASC 810, resulting in a decrease in consolidated inventory not owned of $118.8 million for the six months ended May 31, 2010. To reflect the purchase price of the inventory consolidated, the Company reclassified the related option deposits from land under development to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010. The liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned primarily represent the difference between the option exercise prices for the optioned land and the Company’s cash deposits.

The Company’s exposure to loss related to its option contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities consisted of its non-refundable option deposits and pre-acquisition costs totaling $141.3 million and $127.4 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. Additionally, the Company had posted $48.8 million and $58.2 million, respectively, of letters of credit in lieu of cash deposits under certain option contracts as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.

27


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(16) New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB updated certain provisions of ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations , (“ASC 805”). These provisions broaden the guidance of ASC 805, extending its applicability to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. It broadens the fair value measurement and recognition requirement of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and interests transferred as a result of business combinations. ASC 805 expands on required disclosures to improve the financial statement users’ abilities to evaluate the nature and financial effects of business combinations. ASC 805 was effective for business combinations that close on or after December 1, 2009. The adoption of these new provisions did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset , (“ASU 2010-18”). Under ASU 2010-18, modification of loans accounted for within a pool under provisions for loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality does not result in removal of such loans from the pool even if the modification would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity must continue to consider whether the pool of assets in which the modified loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. ASU 2010-18 does not affect the accounting for loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality that are not accounted for within a pool. Loans accounted for individually that were acquired with deteriorated credit quality continue to be subject to the accounting provisions for troubled debt restructuring by creditors. The amended guidance is to be applied prospectively, with early application permitted. ASU 2010-18 is effective for modifications of loans accounted for within a pool that occur on or after September 1, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

28


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information

The indentures governing the principal amounts of the Company’s 5.125% senior notes due 2010, 5.95% senior notes due 2011, 5.95% senior notes due 2013, 5.50% senior notes due 2014, 5.60% senior notes due 2015, 6.50% senior notes due 2016, 12.25% senior notes due 2017, 6.95% senior notes due 2018 and 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020 require that, if any of the Company’s subsidiaries directly or indirectly guarantee at least $75 million principal amount of debt of Lennar Corporation, those subsidiaries must also guarantee Lennar Corporation’s obligations with regard to its senior notes. Until recently, the Company had a Credit Facility that required that substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries guarantee Lennar Corporation’s obligations under the Credit Facility, and therefore, those subsidiaries also guaranteed the Company’s obligations with regard to its senior notes. The Company recently terminated the Credit Facility and therefore there are no guarantors of Lennar Corporation’s obligations with regard to its senior notes. The entities referred to as “guarantors” in the following tables are subsidiaries that would have been guarantors if the Credit Facility were still in effect. Supplemental financial information for the guarantors is presented as follows:

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

May 31, 2010

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

ASSETS

Lennar Homebuilding:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, net and income tax receivables

$ 1,088,556 139,742 68,276 1,296,574

Inventories

3,591,381 570,753 4,162,134

Investments in unconsolidated entities

572,740 36,913 609,653

Other assets

47,146 98,283 154,297 299,726

Investments in subsidiaries

3,422,300 839,849 (4,262,149 )
4,558,002 5,241,995 830,239 (4,262,149 ) 6,368,087

Rialto Investments

68,971 1,307,443 1,376,414

Lennar Financial Services

150,097 354,282 504,379

Total assets

$ 4,626,973 5,392,092 2,491,964 (4,262,149 ) 8,248,880

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Lennar Homebuilding:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 238,603 658,095 58,367 955,065

Liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned

404,563 404,563

Senior notes and other debts payable

2,394,557 210,050 285,605 2,890,212

Intercompany

(481,081 ) 645,109 (164,028 )
2,152,079 1,917,817 179,944 4,249,840

Rialto Investments

1,001 627,595 628,596

Lennar Financial Services

51,975 289,536 341,511

Total liabilities

2,153,080 1,969,792 1,097,075 5,219,947

Stockholders’ equity

2,473,893 3,422,300 839,849 (4,262,149 ) 2,473,893

Noncontrolling interests

555,040 555,040

Total equity

2,473,893 3,422,300 1,394,889 (4,262,149 ) 3,028,933

Total liabilities and equity

$ 4,626,973 5,392,092 2,491,964 (4,262,149 ) 8,248,880

29


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

November 30, 2009

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

ASSETS

Lennar Homebuilding:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, net and income tax receivables

$ 1,564,529 198,524 33,256 1,796,309

Inventories

3,493,784 594,205 4,087,989

Investments in unconsolidated entities

563,984 35,282 599,266

Other assets

44,232 63,040 156,531 263,803

Investments in subsidiaries

3,389,625 522,148 (3,911,773 )
4,998,386 4,841,480 819,274 (3,911,773 ) 6,747,367

Rialto Investments

9,874 9,874

Lennar Financial Services

153,545 404,005 557,550

Total assets

$ 5,008,260 4,995,025 1,223,279 (3,911,773 ) 7,314,791

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Lennar Homebuilding:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 246,501 702,091 83,588 1,032,180

Liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned

518,359 518,359

Senior notes and other debts payable

2,234,093 223,545 303,714 2,761,352

Intercompany

84,187 102,454 (186,641 )
2,564,781 1,546,449 200,661 4,311,891

Rialto Investments

Lennar Financial Services

58,951 355,935 414,886

Total liabilities

2,564,781 1,605,400 556,596 4,726,777

Stockholders’ equity

2,443,479 3,389,625 522,148 (3,911,773 ) 2,443,479

Noncontrolling interests

144,535 144,535

Total equity

2,443,479 3,389,625 666,683 (3,911,773 ) 2,588,014

Total liabilities and equity

$ 5,008,260 4,995,025 1,223,279 (3,911,773 ) 7,314,791

30


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended May 31, 2010

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 690,449 14,879 705,328

Lennar Financial Services

43,027 46,458 (14,949 ) 74,536

Rialto Investments

1,823 32,794 34,617

Total revenues

1,823 733,476 94,131 (14,949 ) 814,481

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding

633,727 23,915 (953 ) 656,689

Lennar Financial Services

38,158 35,415 (12,690 ) 60,883

Rialto Investments

5,363 14,151 19,514

Corporate general and administrative

21,000 1,234 22,234

Total costs and expenses

26,363 671,885 73,481 (12,409 ) 759,320

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from
unconsolidated entities

(1,382 ) (20 ) (1,402 )

Other income (expense), net

9,496 (262 ) (9,487 ) (253 )

Other interest expense

(12,027 ) (17,516 ) 12,027 (17,516 )

Rialto Investments equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(436 ) (436 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

(27,507 ) 42,431 20,630 35,554

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

18,392 (6,536 ) (826 ) 11,030

Equity in earnings from subsidiaries

48,834 12,939 (61,773 )

Net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests)

39,719 48,834 19,804 (61,773 ) 46,584

Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

6,865 6,865

Net earnings attributable to Lennar

$ 39,719 48,834 12,939 (61,773 ) 39,719

31


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended May 31, 2009

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 791,525 13,704 805,229

Lennar Financial Services

45,405 52,334 (11,115 ) 86,624

Rialto Investments

Total revenues

836,930 66,038 (11,115 ) 891,853

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding

817,415 23,810 (1,950 ) 839,275

Lennar Financial Services

41,663 35,988 (7,566 ) 70,085

Rialto Investments

465 465

Corporate general and administrative

28,140 1,634 29,774

Total costs and expenses

28,605 859,078 59,798 (7,882 ) 939,599

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from
unconsolidated entities

(59,744 ) (146 ) (59,890 )

Other income (expense), net

8,658 (7,893 ) (8,794 ) (8,029 )

Other interest expense

(12,027 ) (14,493 ) 12,027 (14,493 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

(31,974 ) (104,278 ) 6,094 (130,158 )

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

4,278 (1,299 ) (4,526 ) (1,547 )

Equity in earnings (loss) from subsidiaries

(97,489 ) 8,088 89,401

Net earnings (loss) (including net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests)

(125,185 ) (97,489 ) 1,568 89,401 (131,705 )

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

(6,520 ) (6,520 )

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar

$ (125,185 ) (97,489 ) 8,088 89,401 (125,185 )

32


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended May 31, 2010

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 1,198,196 27,908 1,226,104

Lennar Financial Services

75,089 82,219 (29,407 ) 127,901

Rialto Investments

2,124 32,794 34,918

Total revenues

2,124 1,273,285 142,921 (29,407 ) 1,388,923

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding

1,117,785 43,808 (2,939 ) 1,158,654

Lennar Financial Services

73,358 65,630 (23,839 ) 115,149

Rialto Investments

6,766 14,151 20,917

Corporate general and administrative

42,431 2,443 44,874

Total costs and expenses

49,197 1,191,143 123,589 (24,335 ) 1,339,594

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(10,257 ) (39 ) (10,296 )

Other income, net

18,738 13,932 (18,720 ) 13,950

Other interest expense

(23,792 ) (36,181 ) 23,792 (36,181 )

Rialto Investments equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(293 ) (293 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

(52,420 ) 49,636 19,293 16,509

Benefit for income taxes

34,265 (11,144 ) (519 ) 22,602

Equity in earnings from subsidiaries

51,351 12,859 (64,210 )

Net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests)

33,196 51,351 18,774 (64,210 ) 39,111

Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

5,915 5,915

Net earnings attributable to Lennar

$ 33,196 51,351 12,859 (64,210 ) 33,196

33


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended May 31, 2009

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 1,310,148 24,115 1,334,263

Lennar Financial Services

80,191 97,106 (26,644 ) 150,653

Rialto Investments

Total revenues

1,390,339 121,221 (26,644 ) 1,484,916

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding

1,422,617 38,290 (15,073 ) 1,445,834

Lennar Financial Services

73,086 69,107 (8,571 ) 133,622

Rialto Investments

1,021 1,021

Corporate general and administrative

53,867 3,382 57,249

Total costs and expenses

54,888 1,495,703 107,397 (20,262 ) 1,637,726

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(62,661 ) (146 ) (62,807 )

Other income (expense), net

17,438 (43,862 ) (17,410 ) (43,834 )

Other interest expense

(23,792 ) (26,522 ) 23,792 (26,522 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

(61,242 ) (238,409 ) 13,678 (285,973 )

(Provision) benefit for income taxes

7,418 (2,909 ) (7,904 ) (3,395 )

Equity in earnings (loss) from subsidiaries

(227,290 ) 14,028 213,262

Net earnings (loss) (including net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests)

(281,114 ) (227,290 ) 5,774 213,262 (289,368 )

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

(8,254 ) (8,254 )

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar

$ (281,114 ) (227,290 ) 14,028 213,262 (281,114 )

34


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended May 31, 2010

(Dollars in thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests)

$ 33,196 51,351 18,774 (64,210 ) 39,111

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

334,167 (181,405 ) 18,591 64,210 235,563

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

367,363 (130,054 ) 37,365 274,674

Cash flows from investing activities:

Increase in restricted cash related to cash collateralized letters of credit

(125,895 ) (125,895 )

Investments in and contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, net

(43,411 ) (1,969 ) (45,380 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments unconsolidated entities

(56,315 ) (56,315 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments consolidated entities (net of $87.8 million cash and cash equivalents consolidated)

(265,059 ) 87,834 (177,225 )

Increase in Rialto Investments defeasance cash to retire notes payable

(33,723 ) (33,723 )

Other

(769 ) (3,787 ) (100 ) (4,656 )

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(448,038 ) (47,198 ) 52,042 (443,194 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net repayments under Lennar Financial Services debt

(16 ) (56,484 ) (56,500 )

Proceeds from 6.95% senior notes due 2018

247,323 247,323

Debt issuance costs of 6.95% senior notes due 2018

(3,438 ) (3,438 )

Proceeds from 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

276,500 276,500

Debt issuance costs of 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

(5,347 ) (5,347 )

Partial redemption of 5.125% senior notes due 2010

(152,710 ) (152,710 )

Partial redemption of 5.95% senior notes due 2011

(137,973 ) (137,973 )

Partial redemption of 5.95% senior notes due 2013

(84,738 ) (84,738 )

Net repayments on other borrowings

(55,253 ) (24,267 ) (79,520 )

Exercise of land option contracts from an unconsolidated land investment venture

(27,625 ) (27,625 )

Net receipts related to noncontrolling interests

7,002 7,002

Common stock:

Issuances

1,753 1,753

Repurchases

(1,793 ) (1,793 )

Dividends

(14,787 ) (14,787 )

Intercompany

(321,980 ) 256,148 65,832

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(197,190 ) 173,254 (7,917 ) (31,853 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(277,865 ) (3,998 ) 81,490 (200,373 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,223,169 154,313 79,956 1,457,438

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 945,304 150,315 161,446 1,257,065

35


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended May 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests)

$ (281,114 ) (227,290 ) 5,774 213,262 (289,368 )

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

183,978 712,298 (140,917 ) (213,262 ) 542,097

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

(97,136 ) 485,008 (135,143 ) 252,729

Cash flows from investing activities:

Investments in and contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, net

(102,193 ) (2,538 ) (104,731 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments unconsolidated entities

(9,874 ) (9,874 )

Other

(34 ) 14,107 2,616 16,689

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(9,908 ) (88,086 ) 78 (97,916 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net borrowings (repayments) under financial services debt

(47 ) 50,971 50,924

Net proceeds from 12.25% senior notes due 2017

386,892 386,892

Redemption of 7 5 / 8 % senior notes due 2009

(281,477 ) (281,477 )

Net repayments on other borrowings

(649 ) (36,160 ) (36,809 )

Exercise of land option contracts from an unconsolidated land investment venture

(8,075 ) (8,075 )

Net receipts related to noncontrolling interests

192 192

Common stock:

Issuances

123,780 123,780

Repurchases

(1,075 ) (1,075 )

Dividends

(13,256 ) (13,256 )

Intercompany

228,673 (344,633 ) 115,960

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

443,537 (353,404 ) 130,963 221,096

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

336,493 43,518 (4,102 ) 375,909

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,007,594 125,437 70,391 1,203,422

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 1,344,087 168,955 66,289 1,579,331

36


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included under Item 1 of this Report and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2009 filed on Form 8-K dated April 26, 2010.

Some of the statements in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies and prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those described under the caption “ Risk Factors ” included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2009. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by Federal securities laws.

Outlook

During the first half of fiscal 2010, we continued to see a housing market that was trying to stabilize. This stabilization process was impacted by the expiration of the Federal homebuyer tax credit at the end of April. As a result, our new sales orders for the quarter were down 10% from the prior year, with the entire decline coming in the month of May. The tax credit expiration accelerated sales activity to the pre-May period and it may take a couple of months for demand to rebuild. While we experienced a slow down in new orders in May, we believe that this will be temporary and that the market will improve in the second half of 2010.

We have remained focused on improving our core business and returning our company to profitability in 2010. Over the past several years, we have made great strides in lowering our construction costs and repositioning our product offering to target first-time and value-focused homebuyers. As a result of implementing these strategies, our operating margins have improved. In addition, we have made significant progress on right-sizing our business and have aggressively reduced our overhead structure. We narrowed our focus to concentrate on generating strong operating margins and became less focused on driving volume.

Along with the improvement in our core business, our recently formed Rialto Investments segment has already started to contribute to our bottom line results. During the second quarter, our Rialto Investments segment generated $5 million of operating earnings primarily from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) loan portfolios acquired in the first quarter. We expect this segment to be a growing component of our operating earnings in the future.

With our strong, liquid balance sheet, we are well positioned to capitalize on future high-return investment opportunities. We have achieved year-to-date profitability through our second quarter and although challenges still remain in the housing market, we believe that our core businesses are on the right track to achieving sustainable profitability.

37


(1) Results of Operations

Overview

We historically have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. Our results of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The net earnings attributable to Lennar were $39.7 million, or $0.21 per basic and diluted share, in the second quarter of 2010, compared to net loss attributable to Lennar of $125.2 million, or $0.76 per basic and diluted share, in the second quarter of 2009. Net earnings attributable to Lennar was $33.2 million, or $0.18 per basic and diluted share, in the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to net loss attributable to Lennar of $281.1 million, or $1.74 per basic and diluted share, in the six months ended May 31, 2009. The improvement in operating results year over year were a result of lower valuation adjustments, reduced sales incentives and cost reduction initiatives implemented during the downturn such as, lowering our construction costs, repositioning our product offering to target first-time value-focused homebuyers and reducing our overhead structure. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved for the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to a reduction in valuation adjustments, which were not material in the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales.

38


Financial information relating to our operations was as follows:

(In thousands) Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009

Lennar Homebuilding revenues:

Sales of homes

$ 694,758 788,600 1,208,106 1,311,358

Sales of land

10,570 16,629 17,998 22,905

Total homebuilding revenues

705,328 805,229 1,226,104 1,334,263

Lennar Homebuilding costs and expenses:

Cost of homes sold

551,347 712,508 966,319 1,201,084

Cost of land sold

8,563 14,241 14,638 31,047

Selling, general and administrative

96,779 112,526 177,697 213,703

Total homebuilding costs and expenses

656,689 839,275 1,158,654 1,445,834

Lennar Homebuilding operating margins

48,639 (34,046 ) 67,450 (111,571 )

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(1,402 ) (59,890 ) (10,296 ) (62,807 )

Other income (expense), net

(253 ) (8,029 ) 13,950 (43,834 )

Other interest expense

(17,516 ) (14,493 ) (36,181 ) (26,522 )

Lennar Homebuilding operating earnings (loss)

$ 29,468 (116,458 ) 34,923 (244,734 )

Lennar Financial Services revenues

$ 74,536 86,624 127,901 150,653

Lennar Financial Services costs and expenses

60,883 70,085 115,149 133,622

Lennar Financial Services operating earnings

$ 13,653 16,539 12,752 17,031

Rialto Investments revenues

$ 34,617 34,918

Rialto Investments costs and expenses

19,514 465 20,917 1,021

Rialto Investments equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(436 ) (293 )

Rialto Investments operating earnings (loss) (1)

$ 14,667 (465 ) 13,708 (1,021 )

Total operating earnings (loss)

$ 57,788 (100,384 ) 61,383 (228,724 )

Corporate general and administrative expenses

(22,234 ) (29,774 ) (44,874 ) (57,249 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

$ 35,554 (130,158 ) 16,509 (285,973 )

(1) Rialto Investments operating earnings for both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 include $9.6 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Three Months Ended May 31, 2010 versus Three Months Ended May 31, 2009

Revenues from home sales decreased 12% in the second quarter of 2010 to $694.8 million from $788.6 million in 2009. Revenues were lower primarily due to an 8% decrease in the number of home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities, and a 5% decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered. New home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities, decreased to 2,902 homes in the second quarter of 2010 from 3,138 homes last year. The average sales price of homes delivered decreased to $240,000 in the second quarter of 2010 from $251,000 in the same period last year, primarily due to product mix as fewer deliveries occurred in our Homebuilding West segment. Sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of home sales revenue improved to 11.5% in the second quarter of 2010, from 17.3% in the second quarter of 2009 and 12.5% in the first quarter of 2010.

Gross margins on home sales were $143.4 million, or 20.6%, in the second quarter of 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $76.1 million, or 9.6%, in the second quarter of 2009, which included $34.6 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to the reduction in valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales.

39


Selling, general and administrative expenses were reduced by $15.7 million, or 14%, in the second quarter of 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to reductions in legal and occupancy expenses. As a percentage of revenues from home sales, selling, general and administrative expenses improved to 13.9% in the second quarter of 2010, from 14.3% in 2009.

Gross profits on land sales totaled $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to gross profits on land sales of $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2009, net of $5.6 million of valuation adjustments and $1.8 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs.

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities was $1.4 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities of $59.9 million in the second quarter of 2009, which included $50.1 million of valuation adjustments related to assets of unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

Other expense, net, totaled $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2010, which included a pre-tax loss of $10.8 million related to the repurchase of senior notes through a tender offer, offset by other income and a $4.3 million pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of other debt. This is compared to other expense, net, of $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2009, which included $7.0 million of valuation adjustments to our investments in unconsolidated entities.

Homebuilding interest expense was $37.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 ($19.3 million was included in cost of homes sold, $0.3 million in cost of land sold and $17.5 million in other interest expense), compared to $41.9 million in the second quarter of 2009 ($22.9 million was included in cost of homes sold, $4.4 million in cost of land sold and $14.5 million in other interest expense). Despite an increase in debt, interest expense decreased primarily due to an increase in qualifying assets eligible for interest capitalization and savings resulting from the termination of our senior unsecured revolving credit facility during the first quarter of 2010.

Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests were $6.9 million and ($6.5) million, respectively, in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009.

Sales of land, Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities, other expense, net and net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests may vary significantly from period to period depending on the timing of land sales and other transactions entered into by us and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

Operating earnings for the Lennar Financial Services segment was $13.7 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to operating earnings of $16.5 million in the same period last year. The decrease in profitability was due primarily to decreased volume in the segment’s mortgage and title operations, partially offset by $5.1 million of proceeds received from the previous sale of a cable system.

In the second quarter of 2010, operating earnings for the Rialto Investments segment were $14.7 million (which includes $9.6 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests), compared to an operating loss of $0.5 million in the same period last year. In the second quarter of 2010, revenues in this segment were $34.6 million, which consisted primarily of accretable interest income associated with portfolios of real estate loans acquired in partnership with the FDIC. In the second quarter of 2010, expenses in this segment were $19.5 million, which consisted primarily of carrying costs related to those portfolios of real estate loans, underwriting expenses and general and administrative expenses.

Corporate general and administrative expenses were reduced by $7.5 million, or 25%, in the second quarter of 2010, compared to the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to our cost reduction initiatives implemented during the downturn. Corporate general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 2.7% in the second quarter of 2010, from 3.3% in the second quarter of 2009.

During the three months ended May 31, 2010, we generated deferred tax assets of $2.0 million and recorded a non-cash valuation allowance against the entire amount of deferred tax assets generated. A reduction of the carrying amount of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance is required, if based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

40


Our overall effective income tax rates were (38.45%) and (1.25%), respectively, for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. The change in the effective tax rate, compared to same period during 2009, resulted primarily from the reversal of gross unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the withdrawal of an issue by the IRS.

Six Months Ended May 31, 2010 versus Six Months Ended May 31, 2009

Revenues from home sales decreased 8% in the six months ended May 31, 2010 to $1,208.1 million from $1,311.4 million in 2009. Revenues were lower primarily due to a 7% decrease in the number of home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities. New home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities, decreased to 4,890 homes in the six months ended May 31, 2010 from 5,274 homes last year. The average sales price of homes delivered for the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 was $247,000 and $248,000, respectively. Sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of home sales revenue improved to 11.9% in the six months ended May 31, 2010, from 17.2% in the six months ended May 31, 2009.

Gross margins on home sales were $241.8 million, or 20.0%, in the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $110.3 million, or 8.4%, in the six months ended May 31, 2009, which included $75.3 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to the reduction in valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were reduced by $36.0 million, or 17%, in the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to reductions in legal and occupancy expenses. As a percentage of revenues from home sales, selling, general and administrative expenses improved to 14.7% in the six months ended May 31, 2010, from 16.3% in 2009.

Gross profits on land sales totaled $3.4 million in the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to losses on land sales of $8.1 million in the six months ended May 31, 2009, which included $5.8 million of valuation adjustments and $12.1 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs.

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities was $10.3 million in the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities of $62.8 million in the six months ended May 31, 2009, which included $50.1 million of valuation adjustments related to assets of unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

Other income (expense), net, totaled $14.0 million in the six months ended May 31, 2010, which included a pre-tax loss of $10.8 million related to the repurchase of senior notes through a tender offer, offset by other income and a $13.6 million pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of other debt. This is compared to other income (expense), net, of ($43.8) million in the six months ended May 31, 2009, which included $44.2 million of valuation adjustments to our investments in unconsolidated entities.

Homebuilding interest expense was $70.3 million in the six months ended May 31, 2010 ($33.7 million was included in cost of homes sold, $0.4 million in cost of land sold and $36.2 million in other interest expense), compared to $58.8 million in the six months ended May 31, 2009 ($27.7 million was included in cost of homes sold, $4.6 million in cost of land sold and $26.5 million in other interest expense). Interest expense increased primarily due to the interest related to the $400 million 12.25% of senior notes due 2017 issued during the second quarter of 2009.

Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests were $5.9 million and ($8.3) million, respectively, in the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009.

Sales of land, Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities, other income (expense), net and net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests may vary significantly from period to period depending on the timing of land sales and other transactions entered into by us and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

41


Operating earnings for the Lennar Financial Services segment were $12.8 million in the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to operating earnings of $17.0 million in the same period last year. The decrease in profitability was due primarily to decreased volume in the segment’s mortgage and title operations, partially offset by $5.1 million of proceeds received from the previous sale of a cable system.

In the six months ended May 31, 2010, operating earnings for the Rialto Investments segment were $13.7 million (which includes $9.6 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests), compared to an operating loss of $1.0 million in the same period last year. In the six months ended May 31, 2010, revenues in this segment were $34.9 million, which consisted primarily of accretable interest income associated with the portfolios of real estate loans acquired in partnership with the FDIC. In the six months ended May 31, 2010, expenses in this segment were $20.9 million, which consisted primarily of carrying costs related to those portfolios of real estate loans, underwriting expenses and general and administrative expenses.

Corporate general and administrative expenses were reduced by $12.4 million, or 22%, for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year primarily due to our cost reduction initiatives implemented during the downturn. As a percentage of total revenues, corporate general and administrative expenses decreased to 3.2% in the six months ended May 31, 2010, from 3.9% in the same period last year.

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, we generated deferred tax assets of $4.8 million and recorded a non-cash valuation allowance against the entire amount of deferred tax assets generated. A reduction of the carrying amount of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance is required, if based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

Our overall effective income tax rates were (213.36%) and (1.22%), respectively, for the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. The change in the effective tax rate, compared to the same period in 2009, resulted primarily from the reversal of gross unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the withdrawal of an issue by the IRS and settlements with state taxing authorities.

Homebuilding Segments

We have grouped our homebuilding activities into four reportable segments, which we refer to as Homebuilding East, Homebuilding Central, Homebuilding West and Homebuilding Houston, based primarily upon similar economic characteristics, geography and product type. Information about homebuilding activities in states that do not have economic characteristics that are similar to those in other states in the same geographic area is grouped under “Homebuilding Other.” References in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to homebuilding segments are to those reportable segments.

At May 31, 2010, our reportable homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other consisted of homebuilding divisions located in:

East: Florida, Maryland, New Jersey and Virginia

Central: Arizona, Colorado and Texas (1)

West: California and Nevada

Houston : Houston, Texas

Other: Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina and South Carolina

(1) Texas in the Central reportable segment excludes Houston, Texas, which is its own reportable segment.

42


The following tables set forth selected financial and operational information related to our homebuilding operations for the periods indicated:

Selected Financial and Operational Data

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
May 31, May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues:

East:

Sales of homes

$ 219,101 214,937 357,794 393,309

Sales of land

4,786 14,110 8,153 16,436

Total East

223,887 229,047 365,947 409,745

Central :

Sales of homes

100,085 91,624 165,860 153,526

Sales of land

1,786 965 2,094 1,772

Total Central

101,871 92,589 167,954 155,298

West:

Sales of homes

177,612 276,506 340,143 416,996

Sales of land

1,655 1,211 3,441 1,947

Total West

179,267 277,717 343,584 418,943

Houston:

Sales of homes

100,943 116,533 174,770 195,154

Sales of land

2,343 343 4,310 2,750

Total Houston

103,286 116,876 179,080 197,904

Other:

Sales of homes

97,017 89,000 169,539 152,373

Total Other

97,017 89,000 169,539 152,373

Total homebuilding revenues

$ 705,328 805,229 1,226,104 1,334,263

43


Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
May 31, May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Operating earnings (loss):

East:

Sales of homes

$ 23,216 (2,947 ) 38,699 (18,784 )

Sales of land

1,070 5,179 2,304 (303 )

Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities

266 (938 ) (553 ) (2,636 )

Other income (expense), net

(2,524 ) 2,714 8,059 (2,974 )

Other interest expense

(6,293 ) (5,212 ) (12,251 ) (8,799 )

Total East

15,735 (1,204 ) 36,258 (33,496 )

Central:

Sales of homes

2,482 (9,081 ) 140 (26,072 )

Sales of land

223 (446 ) (846 ) (328 )

Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(370 ) (1,181 ) (798 ) (1,823 )

Other expense, net

(545 ) (5,667 ) (1,411 ) (13,124 )

Other interest expense

(2,246 ) (2,202 ) (4,788 ) (3,876 )

Total Central

(456 ) (18,577 ) (7,703 ) (45,223 )

West:

Sales of homes

6,289 (22,864 ) 7,024 (54,818 )

Sales of land

157 (1,593 ) 766 (2,709 )

Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(1,992 ) (57,273 ) (9,480 ) (57,029 )

Other income (expense), net

3,367 (4,615 ) 8,617 (26,936 )

Other interest expense

(6,157 ) (4,206 ) (13,155 ) (8,389 )

Total West

1,664 (90,551 ) (6,228 ) (149,881 )

Houston:

Sales of homes

8,708 7,081 14,021 9,464

Sales of land

557 (99 ) 1,136 (1,016 )

Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities

284 (334 ) 265 (1,149 )

Other income, net

340 205 708 331

Other interest expense

(702 ) (636 ) (1,489 ) (1,198 )

Total Houston

9,187 6,217 14,641 6,432

Other:

Sales of homes

5,937 (8,623 ) 4,206 (13,219 )

Sales of land

(653 ) (3,786 )

Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities

410 (164 ) 270 (170 )

Other expense, net

(891 ) (666 ) (2,023 ) (1,131 )

Other interest expense

(2,118 ) (2,237 ) (4,498 ) (4,260 )

Total Other

3,338 (12,343 ) (2,045 ) (22,566 )

Total homebuilding operating earnings (loss)

$ 29,468 (116,458 ) 34,923 (244,734 )

44


Summary of Homebuilding Data

Deliveries:

Three Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

991 975 $ 219,101 214,937 $ 221,000 220,000

Central

504 466 100,085 91,624 199,000 197,000

West

568 798 185,891 284,101 327,000 356,000

Houston

465 580 100,943 116,534 217,000 201,000

Other

384 330 97,017 89,550 253,000 271,000

Total

2,912 3,149 $ 703,037 796,746 $ 241,000 253,000

Of the total homes delivered listed above, 10 homes with a dollar value of $8.3 million and an average sales price of $828,000 represent deliveries from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to 11 home deliveries with a dollar value of $8.1 million and an average sales price of $741,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2009.

Six Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

1,600 1,769 $ 357,794 393,309 $ 224,000 222,000

Central

821 781 165,860 153,526 202,000 197,000

West

1,016 1,207 361,221 432,217 356,000 358,000

Houston

811 985 174,770 195,154 215,000 198,000

Other

668 549 169,539 152,923 254,000 279,000

Total

4,916 5,291 $ 1,229,184 1,327,129 $ 250,000 251,000

Of the total homes delivered listed above, 26 homes with a dollar value of $21.1 million and an average sales price of $811,000 represent deliveries from unconsolidated entities for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to 17 home deliveries with a dollar value of $15.8 million and an average sales price of $928,000 for the six months ended May 31, 2009.

Sales Incentives (1):

Three Months Ended
Sales Incentives
(In thousands)
Average Sales Incentives Per Home
Delivered
Sales Incentives
as a % of Revenue
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

$ 29,537 53,844 $ 29,800 55,200 11.8% 20.0%

Central

15,641 17,962 31,000 38,500 13.5% 16.4%

West

17,413 53,888 31,200 68,300 8.9% 16.3%

Houston

16,360 20,701 35,200 35,700 14.0% 15.1%

Other

11,416 18,799 29,700 57,300 10.5% 17.4%

Total

$ 90,367 165,194 $ 31,100 52,600 11.5% 17.3%
Six Months Ended
Sales Incentives
(In thousands)
Average Sales Incentives Per Home
Delivered
Sales Incentives
as a % of Revenue
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

$ 52,641 96,101 $ 32,900 54,300 12.8% 19.6%

Central

26,760 31,695 32,600 40,600 13.9% 17.2%

West

33,711 82,947 34,100 69,600 9.0% 16.6%

Houston

29,588 33,321 36,500 33,800 14.5% 14.6%

Other

21,388 29,041 32,000 53,100 11.2% 16.0%

Total

$ 164,088 273,105 $ 33,600 51,800 11.9% 17.2%

(1) Sales incentives relate to home deliveries during the period, excluding deliveries by unconsolidated entities.

45


New Orders (2):

Three Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

1,253 1,107 $ 276,098 242,867 $ 220,000 219,000

Central

487 563 101,839 113,091 209,000 201,000

West

598 890 192,871 314,402 323,000 353,000

Houston

484 649 107,393 132,313 222,000 204,000

Other

385 355 99,859 89,745 259,000 253,000

Total

3,207 3,564 $ 778,060 892,418 $ 243,000 250,000

Of the total new orders listed above, 37 homes with a dollar value of $22.5 million and an average sales price of $609,000 represent new orders from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to 23 new orders with a dollar value of $15.3 million and an average sales price of $664,000 for the three months ended May 31, 2009.

Six Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

2,223 1,823 $ 487,461 398,148 $ 219,000 218,000

Central

903 929 186,818 185,937 207,000 200,000

West

1,052 1,381 356,228 476,078 339,000 345,000

Houston

872 1,044 189,945 206,382 218,000 198,000

Other

734 577 186,216 149,209 254,000 259,000

Total

5,784 5,754 $ 1,406,668 1,415,754 $ 243,000 246,000

Of the total new orders listed above, 46 homes with a dollar value of $30.6 million and an average sales price of $665,000 represent new orders from unconsolidated entities for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to 31 new orders with a dollar value of $20.2 million and an average sales price of $650,000 for the six months ended May 31, 2009.

(2) New orders represent the number of new sales contracts executed with homebuyers, net of cancellations, during the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009.

Backlog:

Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

1,305 843 $ 307,000 208,733 $ 235,000 248,000

Central

249 271 57,175 56,726 230,000 209,000

West

372 421 139,517 152,619 375,000 363,000

Houston

310 328 76,118 68,915 246,000 210,000

Other

263 199 76,133 58,742 289,000 295,000

Total

2,499 2,062 $ 655,943 545,735 $ 262,000 265,000

Of the total homes in backlog listed above, 29 homes with a backlog dollar value of $16.7 million and an average sales price of $577,000 represent the backlog from unconsolidated entities at May 31, 2010, compared with backlog from unconsolidated entities of 21 homes with a backlog dollar value of $16.5 million and an average sales price of $784,000 at May 31, 2009.

46


Backlog represents the number of homes under sales contracts. Homes are sold using sales contracts, which are generally accompanied by sales deposits. In some instances, purchasers are permitted to cancel sales contracts if they fail to qualify for financing or under certain other circumstances. We experienced cancellation rates in our homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other as follows:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009
May 31,
2010
May 31,
2009

East

14 % 18 % 13 % 20 %

Central

19 % 15 % 17 % 16 %

West

23 % 12 % 18 % 14 %

Houston

18 % 17 % 16 % 19 %

Other

16 % 15 % 16 % 17 %

Total

17 % 15 % 15 % 18 %

Three Months Ended May 31, 2010 versus Three Months Ended May 31, 2009

Homebuilding East: Homebuilding revenues for the three months ended May 31, 2010 were down slightly, compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. Gross margins on home sales were $50.8 million, or 23.2%, for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $19.2 million, or 9.0%, for the three months ended May 31, 2009, including $8.8 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (11.8% in 2010, compared to 20.0% in 2009).

Gross profits on land sales were $1.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross profits on land sales of $5.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 (net of $2.0 million of valuation adjustments).

Homebuilding Central: Homebuilding revenues increased for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in the number of home deliveries and average sales price in Texas, excluding Houston. Gross margins on home sales were $15.6 million, or 15.6%, for three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $8.8 million, or 9.6%, for three months ended May 31, 2009, including $2.2 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (13.5% in 2010 and 16.4% in 2009).

Gross profits on land sales were $0.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 (net of $0.4 million of valuation adjustments), compared to losses on land sales of $0.4 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 (including $1.1 million of valuation adjustments).

Homebuilding West: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries and average sales price of homes delivered in all of the states in this segment. Gross margins on home sales were $38.5 million, or 21.7%, for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $23.2 million, or 8.4%, for the three months ended May 31, 2009, including $15.6 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (8.9% in 2010, compared to 16.3% in 2009).

Gross profits on land sales were $0.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 (net of $0.1 million of valuation adjustments), compared to losses on land sales of $1.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 (including $1.2 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs and $2.5 million of valuation adjustments).

47


Homebuilding Houston: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries in this segment, partially offset by an increase in the average sales price of homes delivered. Gross margins on home sales were $20.0 million, or 19.8%, for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $21.4 million, or 18.4%, for the three months ended May 31, 2009, including valuation adjustments of $0.1 million . Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (14.0% in 2010, compared to 15.1% in 2009) and an increase in average sales price.

Gross profits on land sales were $0.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to losses on land sales of $0.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009.

Homebuilding Other: Homebuilding revenues increased for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in the number of home deliveries in all states in Homebuilding Other, except in Illinois. Gross margins on home sales were $18.6 million, or 19.2%, for the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $3.5 million, or 3.9%, for the three months ended May 31, 2009, including $7.9 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (10.5% in 2010, compared to 17.4% in 2009).

There were no land sales in Homebuilding Other for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Losses on land sales for the three months ended May 31, 2009 of $0.7 million due to write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs.

Six Months Ended May 31, 2010 versus Six Months Ended May 31, 2009

Homebuilding East: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the six months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries in Florida. Gross margins on home sales were $85.6 million, or 23.9%, in 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $30.1 million, or 7.6%, for the six months ended May 31, 2009, including $22.3 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (12.8% in 2010, compared to 19.6% in 2009).

Gross profits on land sales were $2.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to losses on land sales of $0.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2009 (including $5.8 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs and $2.1 million of valuation adjustments).

Homebuilding Central: Homebuilding revenues increased for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the six months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in the number of home deliveries in Texas, excluding Houston and an increase in the average sales price of homes delivered in Colorado and Texas, excluding Houston. Gross margins on home sales were $24.5 million, or 14.8%, for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on homes sales of $7.0 million, or 4.6%, for the six months ended May 31, 2009, including $10.3 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (13.9% in 2010, compared to 17.2% in 2009).

Losses on land sales were $0.8 million for the six months ended May 31, 2010 (including $1.8 million of valuation adjustments), compared to losses on land sales of $0.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2009 (including $0.1 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs and $1.2 million of valuation adjustments).

48


Homebuilding West: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the six months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries in all of the states in this segment. Gross margins on home sales were $69.3 million, or 20.4%, for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $30.1 million, or 7.2%, for the six months ended May 31, 2009, including $34.0 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (9.0% in 2010, compared to 16.6% in 2009).

Gross profits on land sales were $0.8 million for the six months ended May 31, 2010 (net of $0.1 million of valuation adjustments), compared to losses on land sales of $2.7 million for the six months ended May 31, 2009 (including $1.7 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs and $2.5 million of valuation adjustments).

Homebuilding Houston: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the six months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries in this segment, partially offset by an increase in the average sales price of homes delivered. Gross margins on home sales were $34.4 million, or 19.7%, for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $33.7 million, or 17.3%, for the six months ended May 31, 2009, including $0.2 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to an increase in average sales price of homes delivered.

Gross profits on land sales were $1.1 million for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to losses on land sales of $1.0 million for the six months ended May 31, 2009 (including $0.7 million of write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs).

Homebuilding Other: Homebuilding revenues increased for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to the six months ended May 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in the number of home deliveries in all states in Homebuilding Other, except in Illinois. Gross margins on home sales were $28.0 million, or 16.5%, for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $9.4 million, or 6.2%, for the six months ended May 31, 2009, including $8.5 million of valuation adjustments. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments and reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales (11.2% in 2010, compared to 16.0% in 2009).

There were no land sales in Homebuilding Other for the six months ended May 31, 2010. Losses on land sales for the six months ended May 31, 2009 of $3.8 million were due to write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs.

At May 31, 2010 and 2009, we owned 82,455 homesites and 76,064 homesites, respectively, and had access to an additional 21,806 homesites and 32,596 homesites, respectively, through either option contracts with third parties or agreements with unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At November 30, 2009, we owned 82,703 homesites and had access to an additional 21,173 homesites through either option contracts with third parties or agreements with unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At May 31, 2010, 3% of the homesites we owned were subject to home purchase contracts. At May 31, 2010 and 2009, our backlog of sales contracts was 2,499 homes ($655.9 million) and 2,062 homes ($545.7 million), respectively. The increase in backlog was primarily attributable to having more new orders than new home deliveries over the last 12 months.

49


Lennar Financial Services Segment

The following table presents selected financial data related to our Lennar Financial Services segment for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues

$ 74,536 86,624 127,901 150,653

Costs and expenses

60,883 70,085 115,149 133,622

Operating earnings

$ 13,653 16,539 12,752 17,031

Dollar value of mortgages originated

$ 781,000 1,267,000 1,331,000 2,236,000

Number of mortgages originated

3,800 5,600 6,200 9,800

Mortgage capture rate of Lennar homebuyers

85 % 89 % 85 % 88 %

Number of title and closing service transactions

24,400 34,700 47,700 61,800

Number of title policies issued

28,200 21,500 52,900 36,500

Rialto Investments Segment

Our Rialto Investments (“Rialto”) segment is a new reportable segment that met the reportable segment criteria set forth in GAAP beginning in the first quarter of 2010. All prior year segment information has been restated to conform with the 2010 presentation. The change had no effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, except for certain reclassifications. Rialto’s objective is to generate superior, risk-adjusted returns by focusing on commercial and residential real estate opportunities arising from dislocations in the United States real estate markets and the eventual restructure and recapitalization of those markets. Rialto intends to deliver these returns through its abilities to source, underwrite, price, manage, turnaround and ultimately monetize real estate assets, as well as providing similar services to others in markets across the country.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Rialto segment for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues

$ 34,617 34,918

Costs and expenses

19,514 465 20,917 1,021

Rialto Investments equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(436 ) (293 )

Operating earnings (loss) (1)

$ 14,667 (465 ) 13,708 (1,021 )

(1) Operating earnings for both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 include $9.6 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

In February 2010, the Rialto segment acquired indirectly 40% managing member equity interests in two limited liability companies (“LLCs”), in partnership with the FDIC, for approximately $243 million (net of transactions costs and a $22 million working capital reserve). The LLCs hold performing and non-performing loans formerly owned by 22 failed financial institutions. The two portfolios consist of more than 5,500 distressed residential and commercial real estate loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of approximately $3 billion and had an initial fair value of approximately $1.2 billion. The FDIC retained a 60% equity interest in the LLCs and provided $626.9 million of notes with 0% interest, which are non-recourse to us. In accordance with GAAP, interest has not been imputed because the notes are with, and guaranteed by, a governmental agency. The notes are secured by the loans held by the LLCs. Additionally, if the LLCs exceed expectations and

50


meet certain internal rate of return and distribution thresholds, our equity interest in the LLCs could be reduced from 40% down to 30%, with a corresponding increase to the FDIC’s equity interest from 60% up to 70%. Although our equity interest could decrease, we would most likely yield a higher return on our investment. As of May 31, 2010, the notes payable balance was $626.9 million; however, during the three months ended May 31, 2010, $33.7 million of cash collections on loans in excess of expenses was deposited in a defeasance account, established solely for the repayment of the notes payable, per the agreement with the FDIC. The funds in the defeasance account will be used to retire the notes payable upon their maturity.

The LLCs met the accounting definition of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and since we were determined to be the primary beneficiary, we consolidated the LLCs. The LLCs are considered VIEs due to the FDIC’s guarantee on the $626.9 million notes payable, as well as our $10 million guarantee of servicer performance. We determined that we were the primary beneficiary because we have the power to direct the activities of the LLCs that most significantly impact the LLCs’ performance through our management agreement. At May 31, 2010, these consolidated LLCs had total combined assets and liabilities of $1.3 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively.

In addition to the acquisition and management of the FDIC portfolios, an affiliate in the Rialto segment is a sub-advisor to the AllianceBernstein L.P. (“AB”) fund formed under the Federal government’s Public-Private Investment Program (“PPIP”) and receives management fees for sub-advisory services. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, we invested $15.0 million and $56.3 million, respectively, in the AB PPIP fund. As of May 31, 2010, our investment in the AB PPIP fund was $57.8 million.

We have grouped these investments in our Rialto segment, along with our $7.4 million, or approximately 5%, investment in a service and infrastructure provider to the residential home loan market (the “Servicer”), which provides services to the LLCs.

(2) Financial Condition and Capital Resources

At May 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents related to our homebuilding, financial services and Rialto operations of $1.3 billion, compared to $1.6 billion at May 31, 2009.

We finance our land acquisition and development activities, construction activities, financial services activities, Rialto activities and general operating needs primarily with cash generated from our operations, debt issuances and equity offerings, as well as cash borrowed under warehouse lines of credit.

Operating Cash Flow Activities

In the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, cash provided by operating activities amounted to $274.7 million and $252.7 million, respectively. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, cash provided by operating activities was positively impacted by the receipt of a tax refund of $323.7 million generated primarily from losses incurred prior to fiscal 2010. This was partially offset by an increase in inventories of $131.3 million, primarily due to land purchases during the six months ended May 31, 2010.

Investing Cash Flow Activities

During the six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, cash used in investing activities totaled $443.2 million and $97.9 million, respectively. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, our Rialto segment contributed $243 million of cash (net of $22 million working capital reserve) to acquire indirectly 40% managing member interests in two LLCs in partnership with the FDIC. Upon the consolidation of the LLCs that hold the two portfolios of real estate loans acquired in the FDIC transaction, the Company consolidated $87.8 million of cash, resulting in net contributions to consolidated entities by the Rialto segment of $177.2 million during the six months ended May 31, 2010. The Rialto segment also contributed $56.3 million of cash to unconsolidated entities (the AB PPIP fund). In the six months ended May 31, 2010, we also contributed $58.2 million of cash to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, compared to $108.4 million during the six months ended May 31, 2009. In addition, there was an increase in cash used in investing activities related to an increase of $125.9 million in restricted cash used to collateralize letters of credit.

51


We are always looking at the possibility of acquiring homebuilders and other companies. However, at May 31, 2010, we had no agreements or understandings regarding any significant transactions.

Financing Cash Flow Activities

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, our cash used in financing activities was primarily attributed to the redemption of senior notes, principal payments on other borrowings and net repayments under our Lennar Financial Services’ warehouse repurchase facilities, offset primarily by the issuance of new debt.

Debt to total capital ratios are financial measures commonly used in the homebuilding industry and are presented to assist in understanding the leverage of our Lennar Homebuilding operations. Management believes providing a measure of leverage of our Lennar Homebuilding operations enables management and readers of our financial statements to better understand our financial position and performance. Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital and net Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital are calculated as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009
May 31,
2009

Lennar Homebuilding debt

$ 2,890,212 2,761,352 2,664,853

Stockholders’ equity

2,473,893 2,443,479 2,482,006

Total capital

$ 5,364,105 5,204,831 5,146,859

Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital

53.9 % 53.1 % 51.8 %

Lennar Homebuilding debt

$ 2,890,212 2,761,352 2,664,853

Less: Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents

1,087,698 1,330,603 1,447,011

Net Lennar Homebuilding debt

$ 1,802,514 1,430,749 1,217,842

Net Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital (1)

42.2 % 36.9 % 32.9 %

(1) Net Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital consists of net Lennar Homebuilding debt (Lennar Homebuilding debt less Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents) divided by total capital (net Lennar Homebuilding debt plus stockholders’ equity).

At May 31, 2010, Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital and net Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital were higher compared to May 31, 2009, due to the increase in Lennar Homebuilding debt as a result of an increase in senior notes and a decrease in Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents.

Our Lennar Homebuilding average debt outstanding was $2.7 billion for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to $2.6 billion in the same period last year. The average rate for interest incurred was 6.3% for the six months ended May 31, 2010, compared to 5.9% for the six months ended May 31, 2009. Interest incurred related to Lennar Homebuilding debt for the six months ended May 31, 2010 was $90.6 million, compared to $77.5 million in the same period last year. The majority of our short-term financing needs, including financings for land acquisition and development activities and general operating needs, are met with cash generated from operations and debt issuances.

In February 2010, we terminated our $1.1 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). We had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility as it was only being used to issue letters of credit. We entered into cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements with two banks with a capacity totaling $225 million. As of May 31, 2010, we had $124.6 million of cash-collateralized letters of credit. We expect to save over $8 million annually as a result of terminating the Credit Facility and entering into more cost effective cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements.

52


Our performance letters of credit outstanding were $78.1 million and $97.7 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. Our financial letters of credit outstanding were $195.5 million and $205.4 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. Performance letters of credit are generally posted with regulatory bodies to guarantee our performance of certain development and construction activities, and financial letters of credit are generally posted in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts and for insurance risks, credit enhancements and as other collateral.

In May 2010, we issued $250 million of 6.95% senior notes due 2018 (the “6.95% Senior Notes”) at a price of 98.929% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after payment of initial purchaser’s discount and expenses, were $243.9 million. We used the net proceeds of the sale of the 6.95% Senior Notes to fund purchases pursuant to our tender offer for our 5.125% senior notes due October 2010, our 5.95% senior notes due 2011 and our 5.95% senior notes due 2013. Interest on the 6.95% Senior Notes is due semi-annually beginning December 1, 2010. The 6.95% Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated, and may at some time be guaranteed by some or substantially all of our subsidiaries. At May 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the 6.95% Senior Notes was $247.3 million.

In May 2010, we issued $276.5 million of 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2.00% Convertible Senior Notes”) at a price of 100% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after payment of expenses, were $271.2 million. The net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, including repayments or repurchases of existing senior notes or other indebtedness. The 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes are convertible into shares of the Lennar Class A common stock at the initial conversion rate of 36.1827 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $27.64 per share of Class A common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. Holders of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase them for cash equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest, on each of December 1, 2013 and December 1, 2015. We will have the right to redeem the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes at any time on or after December 1, 2013 for 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest. Interest on the 2.00% Senior Notes is due semi-annually beginning December 1, 2010. Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing December 1, 2013, under certain circumstances based on the average trading price of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes, we may be required to pay contingent interest. The 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated, and may at some time be guaranteed by some or substantially all of our subsidiaries. At May 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes was $276.5 million.

In May 2010, we repurchased $289.4 million aggregate principal amount, or 38%, of our senior notes due 2010, 2011 and 2013 through a tender offer that ran from April 27, 2010 through May 25, 2010, resulting in a pre-tax loss of $10.8 million. Through the tender offer, we repurchased $76.4 million principal amount of our 5.125% senior notes due October 2010, $130.8 million principal amount of our 5.95% senior notes due 2011 and $82.3 million of our 5.95% senior notes due 2013.

In addition to the tender offer, during the six months ended May 31, 2010, we repurchased $74.4 million principal amount of our 5.125% senior notes due October 2010 and $1.0 million principal amount of our 5.95% senior notes due 2011, resulting in a pre-tax loss of $0.9 million. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, we also retired $98.3 million of mortgage notes on land and other debt, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $13.6 million.

At May 31, 2010, our Lennar Financial Services segment had a warehouse repurchase facility that matures in July 2010 with a maximum aggregate commitment of $125 million and a warehouse repurchase facility that matured in June 2010 with a maximum aggregate commitment of $200 million. In addition, at May 31, 2010, our Lennar Financial Services segment had a warehouse repurchase facility that was renewed in May 2010 and matures in April 2011 with a maximum aggregate commitment of $100 million and an additional uncommitted amount of $100 million. At May 31, 2010, the maximum aggregate commitment under these facilities totaled $425 million.

In June 2010, our Lennar Financial Services segment amended its warehouse repurchase facility that matured in June 2010 by extending its maturity to August 2010 and reducing the maximum aggregate commitment to $100 million.

53


Our Lennar Financial Services segment uses these facilities to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold to investors and expects the facilities to be renewed or replaced with other facilities when they mature. Borrowings under the facilities were $161.0 million and $217.5 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, and were collateralized by mortgage loans and receivables on loans sold to investors but not yet paid for with outstanding principal balances of $170.9 million and $266.9 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.

Since our Lennar Financial Services segment’s borrowings under the lines of credit are generally repaid with the proceeds from the sales of mortgage loans and receivables on loans that secure those borrowings, the facilities are not likely to be a call on our current or future cash resources. If the facilities are not renewed, the borrowings under the lines of credit will be paid off by selling the mortgage loans held-for-sale to investors and by collecting on receivables on loans sold to investors but not yet paid. Without the facilities, our Lennar Financial Services segment would have to use cash from operations and other funding sources to finance its lending activities.

Changes in Capital

We have a stock repurchase program which permits the purchase of up to 20 million shares of our outstanding common stock. During both the three and six months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no share repurchases under the stock repurchase program. As of May 31, 2010, 6.2 million shares of common stock can be repurchased in the future under the program.

During the three months ended May 31, 2010, treasury stock increased by an immaterial amount of common shares. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, treasury stock increased by 0.1 million common shares, in connection with activity related to our equity compensation plan and forfeitures of restricted stock.

On May 20, 2010, we paid cash dividends of $0.04 per share for both our Class A and Class B common stock to holders of record at the close of business on May 5, 2010, as declared by our Board of Directors on April 14, 2010. On June 23, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share on both our Class A and Class B common stock payable on August 5, 2010 to holders of record at the close of business on July 21, 2010.

Based on our current financial condition and credit relationships, we believe that our operations and borrowing resources will provide for our current and long-term capital requirements at our anticipated levels of activity.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Lennar Homebuilding—Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

At May 31, 2010, we had equity investments in 53 unconsolidated entities (of which 16 had recourse debt, 14 had non-recourse debt and 23 had no debt), compared to 58 and 61 unconsolidated entities at February 28, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively. Historically, we invested in unconsolidated entities that acquired and developed land (1) for our homebuilding operations or for sale to third parties or (2) for the construction of homes for sale to third-party homebuyers. Through these entities, we primarily sought to reduce and share our risk by limiting the amount of our capital invested in land, while obtaining access to potential future homesites and allowing us to participate in strategic ventures. The use of these entities also, in some instances, enabled us to acquire land to which we could not otherwise obtain access, or could not obtain access on as favorable terms, without the participation of a strategic partner. Participants in these joint ventures are land owners/developers, other homebuilders and financial or strategic partners. Joint ventures with land owners/developers give us access to homesites owned or controlled by our partner. Joint ventures with other homebuilders provide us with the ability to bid jointly with our partner for large land parcels. Joint ventures with financial partners allow us to combine our homebuilding expertise with access to our partners’ capital. Joint ventures with strategic partners allow us to combine our homebuilding expertise with the specific expertise (e.g., commercial or infill experience) of our partner. Each joint venture is governed by an executive committee consisting of members from the partners.

54


Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method was as follows:

Statements of Operations and Selected Information

Three Months Ended
May 31,
At or for the
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues

$ 42,768 53,460 99,523 119,243

Costs and expenses

68,820 580,167 148,000 695,365

Net loss of unconsolidated entities (1)

$ (26,052 ) (526,707 ) (48,477 ) (576,122 )

Our share of net loss

$ (1,376 ) (58,950 ) (9,532 ) (63,250 )

Our share of net loss – recognized

$ (1,402 ) (59,890 ) (10,296 ) (62,807 )

Our cumulative share of net earnings – deferred at May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively

$ 9,986 16,141

Our investments in unconsolidated entities

$ 609,653 646,406

Equity of the unconsolidated entities

$ 2,237,771 2,092,145

Our investment % in the unconsolidated entities

27 % 31 %

(1) The net loss of unconsolidated entities for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 was primarily related to valuation adjustments recorded by the unconsolidated entities. Our exposure to such losses was significantly lower as a result of our small ownership interest in the respective unconsolidated entities or our previous valuation adjustments to our investments in unconsolidated entities.

Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 118,942 171,946

Inventories

3,581,140 3,628,491

Other assets

300,914 403,383
$ 4,000,996 4,203,820

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 325,064 366,141

Debt

1,438,161 1,588,390

Equity of:

Lennar

609,653 599,266

Others

1,628,118 1,650,023

Total equity of unconsolidated entities

2,237,771 2,249,289
$ 4,000,996 4,203,820

Our equity in the unconsolidated entities

27 % 27 %

In fiscal 2007, we sold a portfolio of land to a strategic land investment venture with Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., an affiliate of Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., in which we have a 20% ownership interest and 50% voting rights. Due to our continuing involvement, the transaction did not qualify as a sale by us under GAAP; thus, the inventory has remained on our consolidated balance sheet in consolidated inventory not owned. As of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, the portfolio of land (including land development costs) of $452.1 million and $477.9 million, respectively, is reflected as inventory in the summarized condensed financial information related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities.

55


Debt to total capital of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which we have investments was calculated as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Debt

$ 1,438,161 1,588,390

Equity

2,237,771 2,249,289

Total capital

$ 3,675,932 3,837,679

Debt to total capital of our unconsolidated entities

39.1 % 41.4 %

Our investments in Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities by type of venture were as follows:

(In thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Land development

$ 576,001 555,799

Homebuilding

33,652 43,467

Total investments

$ 609,653 599,266

The summary of our net recourse exposure related to our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which we have investments was as follows:

May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009
(In thousands)

Several recourse debt – repayment

$ 37,316 42,691

Several recourse debt – maintenance

49,769 75,238

Joint and several recourse debt – repayment

75,017 85,799

Joint and several recourse debt – maintenance

71,592 81,592

Land seller debt and other debt recourse exposure

2,420

Lennar’s maximum recourse exposure

233,694 287,740

Less: joint and several reimbursement agreements with our partners

(87,757 ) (93,185 )

Our net recourse exposure

$ 145,937 194,555

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, we reduced our maximum recourse exposure related to indebtedness of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities by $54.0 million, of which $32.0 million was paid by us and $22.0 million related to the reduction of joint ventures, the reduction of joint and several recourse debt and the joint ventures selling inventory. As of May 31, 2010, we had $13.1 million of obligation guarantees recorded as a liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. The obligation guarantees are estimated based on current facts and circumstances and any unexpected changes may lead us to incur additional liabilities under our obligation guarantees in the future.

Indebtedness of an unconsolidated entity is secured by its own assets. Some unconsolidated entities own multiple properties and other assets. There is no cross collateralization of debt to different unconsolidated entities. We also do not use our investment in one unconsolidated entity as collateral for the debt in another unconsolidated entity or commingle funds among our unconsolidated entities.

In connection with a loan to an unconsolidated entity, we and our partners often guarantee to a lender either jointly and severally or on a several basis, any, or all of the following: (i) the completion of the development, in whole or in part, (ii) indemnification of the lender from environmental issues, (iii) indemnification of the lender from “bad boy acts” of the unconsolidated entity (or full recourse liability in the event of unauthorized transfer or bankruptcy) and (iv) that the loan to value and/or loan to cost will not exceed a certain percentage (maintenance or remargining guarantee) or that a percentage of the outstanding loan will be repaid (repayment guarantee).

56


In connection with loans to an unconsolidated entity where there is a joint and several guarantee, we generally have a reimbursement agreement with our partner. The reimbursement agreement provides that neither party is responsible for more than its proportionate share of the guarantee. However, if our joint venture partner does not have adequate financial resources to meet its obligations under the reimbursement agreement, we may be liable for more than our proportionate share, up to our maximum exposure, which is the full amount covered by the joint and several guarantee.

The recourse debt exposure in the previous table represents our maximum exposure to loss from guarantees and does not take into account the underlying value of the collateral or the other assets of the borrowers that are available to repay the debt or to reimburse us for any payments on our guarantees. Our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities that have recourse debt have a significant amount of assets and equity. The summarized balance sheets of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities with recourse debt were as follows:

(In thousands) May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009

Assets

$ 1,095,862 1,324,993

Liabilities

638,937 777,836

Equity

456,925 547,157

In addition, in most instances in which we have guaranteed debt of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity, our partners have also guaranteed that debt and are required to contribute their share of the guarantee payment. Some of our guarantees are repayment guarantees and some are maintenance guarantees. In a repayment guarantee, we and our venture partners guarantee repayment of a portion or all of the debt in the event of a default before the lender would have to exercise its rights against the collateral. In the event of default, if our venture partner does not have adequate financial resources to meet its obligation under the reimbursement agreement, we may be liable for more than our proportionate share, up to our maximum recourse exposure, which is the full amount covered by the joint and several guarantee. The maintenance guarantees only apply if the value of the collateral (generally land and improvements) is less than a specified percentage of the loan balance. If we are required to make a payment under a maintenance guarantee to bring the value of the collateral above the specified percentage of the loan balance, the payment would constitute a capital contribution or loan to the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity and increase our share of any funds the unconsolidated entity distributes.

In many of the loans to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, we and our joint venture partners (or entities related to them) have been required to give guarantees of completion to the lenders. Those completion guarantees may require that the guarantors complete the construction of the improvements for which the financing was obtained. If the construction is to be done in phases, very often the guarantee generally is limited to completing only the phases as to which construction has already commenced and for which loan proceeds were used.

During the three months ended May 31, 2010, there were payments of $5.0 million under our maintenance guarantees and there were other loan paydowns of $21.1 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under our repayment guarantees. During the three months ended May 31, 2009, there were payments of $18.0 million under our maintenance guarantees and there were other loan repayments of $19.7 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under our repayment guarantees. During the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no payments under completion guarantees.

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, there were payments of $5.0 million under our maintenance guarantees and there were other loan paydowns of $27.0 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under our repayment guarantees. During the six months ended May 31, 2009, there were payments of $18.0 million under our maintenance guarantees and there were other loan repayments of

57


$38.5 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under our repayment guarantees. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, there were no payments under completion guarantees. During the six months ended May 31, 2009, there was a payment of $5.6 million under a completion guarantee related to one joint venture. Payments made under guarantees are recorded primarily as contributions to our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities.

As of May 31, 2010, the fair values of the maintenance guarantees, completion guarantees and repayment guarantees were not material. We believe that as of May 31, 2010, in the event we become legally obligated to perform under a guarantee of the obligation of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity due to a triggering event under a guarantee, most of the time the collateral should be sufficient to repay at least a significant portion of the obligation or we and our partners would contribute additional capital into the venture.

The total debt of Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which we have investments was as follows:

May 31,
2010
November 30,
2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Lennar’s net recourse exposure

$ 145,937 194,555

Reimbursement agreements from partners

87,757 93,185

Lennar’s maximum recourse exposure

$ 233,694 287,740

Non-recourse bank debt and other debt (partners’ share of several recourse)

$ 104,482 140,078

Non-recourse land seller debt and other debt

46,604 47,478

Non-recourse bank debt with completion guarantees

607,876 608,397

Non-recourse bank debt without completion guarantees

445,505 504,697

Non-recourse debt to Lennar

1,204,467 1,300,650

Total debt

$ 1,438,161 1,588,390

Lennar’s maximum recourse exposure as a % of total JV debt

16 % 18 %

In view of current credit market conditions, it is not uncommon for lenders to real estate developers, including joint ventures in which we have interests, to assert non-monetary defaults (such as failure to meet construction completion deadlines or declines in the market value of collateral below required amounts) or technical monetary defaults against the real estate developers. In most instances, those asserted defaults are resolved by modifications of the loan terms, additional equity investments or other concessions by the borrowers. In addition, in some instances, real estate developers, including joint ventures in which we have interests, are forced to request temporary waivers of covenants in loan documents or modifications of loan terms, which are often, but not always obtained. However, in some instances, developers, including joint ventures in which we have interests, are not able to meet their monetary obligations to lenders, and are thus declared in default. Because we sometimes guarantee all or portions of the obligations to lenders of joint ventures in which we have interests, when these joint ventures default on their obligations, lenders may or may not have claims against us. Normally, we do not make payments with regard to guarantees of joint venture obligations while the joint ventures are contesting assertions regarding sums due to their lenders. When it is determined that a joint venture is obligated to make a payment that we have guaranteed and the joint venture will not be able to make that payment, we accrue the amounts probable to be paid by us as a liability. Although we generally fulfill our guarantee obligations within reasonable time after we determine that we are obligated with regard to them, at any point in time it is likely that we will have some balance of unpaid guarantee liability. At May 31, 2010, the liability for unpaid guarantees of joint venture indebtedness on our consolidated balance sheet totaled $13.1 million.

58


The following table summarizes the principal maturities of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities (“JVs”) debt as per current debt arrangements as of May 31, 2010 and does not represent estimates of future cash payments that will be made to reduce JV debt balances. Many JV loans have extension options in the loan agreements that would allow the loans to be extended into future years.

Principal Maturities of Unconsolidated JVs by Period
(In thousands) Total JV
Assets (1)
Total JV
Debt
2010 2011 2012 Thereafter Other
Debt (2)

Net recourse debt to Lennar

$ 145,937 67,046 33,651 30,063 15,177

Reimbursement agreements

87,757 50,878 28,445 8,434

Gross recourse debt to Lennar

$ 1,095,862 233,694 67,046 84,529 58,508 23,611

Debt without recourse to Lennar

2,532,412 1,204,467 67,664 977,945 62,098 48,235 48,525

Total

$ 3,628,274 1,438,161 134,710 1,062,474 120,606 71,846 48,525

(1) Excludes unconsolidated joint venture assets where the joint venture has no debt.
(2) Represents land seller debt and other debt.

The following table is a breakdown of the assets, debt and equity of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated joint ventures by partner type as of May 31, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands) Total JV
Assets
Gross
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
Reimbursement
Agreements
Net
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
Total Debt
Without
Recourse to
Lennar
Total JV
Debt
Total JV
Equity
JV Debt
to Total
Capital
Ratio
Remaining
Homes/
Homesites
in JV

Partner Type:

Financial

$ 2,485,794 56,530 50,878 5,652 876,843 933,373 1,287,265 42 % 42,366

Land Owners/Developers

642,281 52,927 52,927 134,096 187,023 387,250 33 % 25,105

Other Builders

477,900 50,128 8,434 41,694 102,217 152,345 294,847 34 % 6,939

Strategic

395,021 74,109 28,445 45,664 42,786 116,895 268,409 30 % 6,740

Total

$ 4,000,996 233,694 87,757 145,937 1,155,942 1,389,636 2,237,771 38 % 81,150

Land seller debt and other debt

$ 48,525 48,525

Total JV debt

$ 233,694 87,757 145,937 1,204,467 1,438,161

59


The table below indicates the assets, debt and equity of our 10 largest Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated joint venture investments as of May 31, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands) Lennar’s
Investment
Total JV
Assets
Gross
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
Reimbursement
Agreements
Net
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
Total Debt
Without
Recourse
to Lennar
Total JV
Debt
Total JV
Equity
JV Debt
to Total
Capital
Ratio

Land development JVs (1) :

Platinum Triangle Partners

$ 103,413 270,555 56,889 28,445 28,444 56,889 204,938 22 %

Heritage Fields El Toro

83,689 1,270,970 565,044 565,044 669,663 46 %

56th & Lone Mountain

54,468 109,733 108,937

Newhall Land Development

49,159 454,113 282,976

Runkle Canyon

36,633 74,458 73,267

Ballpark Village

32,819 122,460 56,910 56,910 65,173 47 %

MS Rialto Residential Holdings

32,273 460,993 103,992 103,992 336,837 24 %

Rocking Horse Partners

19,400 48,793 9,138 9,138 38,799 19 %

Treasure Island Community Development

18,322 37,505 36,675

Krome Groves Land Trust

17,754 88,306 13,353 13,353 26,697 40,050 44,576 47 %

10 largest JV investments

447,930 2,937,886 70,242 28,445 41,797 761,781 832,023 1,861,841 31 %

Other JVs

161,723 1,063,110 163,452 59,312 104,140 394,161 557,613 375,930 60 %

Total

$ 609,653 4,000,996 233,694 87,757 145,937 1,155,942 1,389,636 2,237,771 38 %

Land seller debt and other debt

$ 48,525 48,525

Total JV debt

$ 233,694 87,757 145,937 1,204,467 1,438,161

(1) All of the joint ventures presented in this table operate in our Homebuilding West segment except for 56th & Lone Mountain and Rocking Horse Partners, which operate in our Homebuilding Central segment, Krome Groves Land Trust, which operates in our Homebuilding East segment and MS Rialto Residential Holdings, which operates in all of our homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other.

The table below indicates the percentage of assets, debt and equity of our 10 largest Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated joint venture investments as of May 31, 2010:

% of
Total JV
Assets
% of Gross
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
% of Net
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
% of Total
Debt Without
Recourse to
Lennar
% of
Total JV
Equity

10 largest JVs

73 % 30 % 29 % 66 % 83 %

Other

27 % 70 % 71 % 34 % 17 %

Total

100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Rialto Investments—Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

In March 2009, the Legacy Securities program was announced by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) under the Federal government’s PPIP. The PPIP matches private capital with public capital and financing provided by the U.S. Treasury, which provides an opportunity for private investors to invest in certain non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued prior to 2009 that were originally rated AAA, or an equivalent rating, by two or more nationally recognized statistical organizations without ratings enhancements. These securities are backed directly by actual mortgage loans and not by other securities.

During 2009, we committed to invest $75 million in the Federal government’s PPIP fund managed by AB. An affiliate of Rialto is a sub-advisor to the AB PPIP fund and receives management fees for sub-advisory services. Total equity commitments of approximately $1.2 billion were made by private investors in this fund, and the U.S. Treasury has committed to a matching amount of approximately $1.2 billion of equity in the fund, as well as agreeing to extend up to approximately $2.3 billion of financing. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2010, we invested $15.0 million and $56.3 million, respectively, in the AB PPIP fund. As of May 31, 2010, our investment in the AB PPIP fund was $57.8 million.

60


As of May 31, 2010, the portfolio of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities owned by the AB PPIP fund was $3.6 billion and it is reflected in investments in the summarized condensed balance sheets of Rialto’s unconsolidated entities.

As of May 31, 2010, a subsidiary in our Rialto segment also has a $7.4 million, or approximately 5%, investment in the Servicer, which provides services to the consolidated LLCs.

Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Rialto’s investment in unconsolidated entities in which Rialto has investments that are accounted for by the equity method as of May 31, 2010 was as follows:

Balance Sheets

May 31, November 30,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 (1)

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 35,535 2,229

Investments

3,556,824

Other assets

193,294 179,985
$ 3,785,653 182,214

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 164,841 58,209

Partner loans

137,820 135,570

Debt

1,725,000

Equity of:

Rialto Investments

65,176 9,874

Others

1,692,816 (21,439 )

Total equity of unconsolidated entities

1,757,992 (11,565 )
$ 3,785,653 182,214

(1) Amounts included as of November 30, 2009 relate only to the Servicer because we did not invest in the AB PPIP fund until December 2009.

Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended
May 31,
Six Months Ended
May 31,
(In thousands) 2010 2009 2010 2009

Revenues

$ 87,995 16,442 119,327 21,236

Costs and expenses

65,225 26,976 74,024 35,432

Net earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities

22,770 (10,534 ) 45,303 (14,196 )

Rialto Investments’ share of net loss recognized

$ (436 ) (293 )

61


Option Contracts

We have access to land through option contracts, which generally enables us to control portions of properties owned by third parties (including land funds) and unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise the option.

The table below indicates the number of homesites owned and homesites to which we had access through option contracts with third parties (“optioned”) or unconsolidated joint ventures (“JV”s) (i.e., controlled homesites) at May 31, 2010 and 2009:

Controlled Homesites

May 31, 2010

Optioned JVs Total Owned
Homesites
Total
Homesites

East

5,320 1,723 7,043 27,718 34,761

Central

1,209 2,131 3,340 15,559 18,899

West

210 7,186 7,396 25,589 32,985

Houston

1,363 1,693 3,056 6,463 9,519

Other

897 74 971 7,126 8,097

Total homesites

8,999 12,807 21,806 82,455 104,261
Controlled Homesites

May 31, 2009

Optioned JVs Total Owned
Homesites
Total
Homesites

East

7,884 2,985 10,869 25,664 36,533

Central

1,422 3,971 5,393 16,502 21,895

West

29 11,743 11,772 19,148 30,920

Houston

1,125 2,254 3,379 6,693 10,072

Other

506 677 1,183 8,057 9,240

Total homesites

10,966 21,630 32,596 76,064 108,660

We evaluate all option contracts for land to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, we are required to consolidate the land under option at the purchase price of the optioned land. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the effect of consolidation of these option contracts was a net increase of $5.5 million to consolidated inventory not owned with a corresponding increase to liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010. In addition, consolidated inventory not owned decreased due to (1) our exercise of options to acquire land under certain contracts previously consolidated and (2) the deconsolidation of certain option contracts totaling $75.5 million related to the adoption of certain new provisions under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation , resulting in a decrease in consolidated inventory not owned of $118.8 million for the six months ended May 31, 2010. To reflect the purchase price of the inventory consolidated, we reclassified the related option deposits from land under development to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010. The liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned primarily represent the difference between the option exercise prices for the optioned land and our cash deposits.

Our exposure to loss related to our option contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities consisted of our non-refundable option deposits and pre-acquisition costs totaling $141.3 million and $127.4 million, respectively, at May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009. Additionally, we had posted $48.8 million and $58.2 million, respectively, of letters of credit in lieu of cash deposits under certain option contracts as of May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.

62


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, our contractual obligations with regards to debt related to our operations changed. In February 2010, our Rialto segment acquired indirectly 40% managing member equity interests in two LLCs in partnership with the FDIC. The LLCs are considered variable interest entities and we were determined to be the primary beneficiary and therefore we consolidated the LLCs. Under the terms of the transaction, the FDIC provided $626.9 million of notes guaranteed by the FDIC with 0% interest, which are non-recourse to us. In April 2010, we issued $250 million of 6.95% senior notes due 2018 and $276.5 million of 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020. In May 2010, we repurchased $289.4 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2010, 2011 and 2013 through a tender offer. The following summarizes our contractual debt obligations as of May 31, 2010:

Payments Due by Period
(In thousands) Total Six months
ending
November 30,
2010
December 1,
2010 through
November 30,
2011
December 1,
2011 through
November 30,
2013
December 1,
2013 through
November 30,
2015
Thereafter

Lennar Homebuilding - Senior notes and other
debts payable

$ 2,890,212 270,638 164,054 500,849 785,972 1,168,699

Lennar Financial Services - Notes and other
debts payable

161,057 160,982 20 42 13

Interest commitments under interest-bearing debt (1)

916,667 86,548 163,185 290,594 227,367 148,973

Rialto Investments - Notes payable (2)

626,906 470,906 156,000

Other contractual obligation (3)

18,685 18,685

Total contractual obligations (4)

$ 4,613,527 536,853 327,259 1,262,391 1,169,352 1,317,672

(1) Interest commitments on variable interest-bearing debt are determined based on the interest rate as of May 31, 2010.
(2) Amount represents debt that consolidated as part of the LLC consolidation related to the FDIC transaction and is non-recourse to Lennar; however, $33.7 million of cash collections on loans in excess of expenses was deposited in a defeasance account established solely for the repayment of the notes payable.
(3) Commitment to fund an equity investment.
(4) Total contractual obligations exclude our gross unrecognized tax benefits of $46.0 million as of May 31, 2010, because we are unable to make reasonable estimates as to the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities.

We are subject to the usual obligations associated with entering into contracts (including option contracts) for the purchase, development and sale of real estate in the routine conduct of our business. Option contracts for the purchase of land generally enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties and unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise our option. This reduces our financial risk associated with land holdings. At May 31, 2010, we had access to 21,806 homesites through option contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At May 31, 2010, we had $48.8 million of letters of credit posted in lieu of cash deposits under certain option contracts.

At May 31, 2010, we had letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $273.6 million (which included the $48.8 million of letters of credit discussed above). These letters of credit are generally posted either with regulatory bodies to guarantee our performance of certain development and construction activities or in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts. Additionally, at May 31, 2010, we had outstanding performance and surety bonds related to site improvements at various projects (including certain projects of our joint ventures) of $777.6 million. Although significant development and construction activities have been completed related to these site improvements, these bonds are generally not released until all of the development and construction activities are completed. As of May 31, 2010, there were approximately $324.7 million, or 42%, of costs to complete related to these site improvements. We do not presently anticipate any draws upon these bonds, but if any such draws occur, we do not believe they would have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

63


Our Lennar Financial Services segment had a pipeline of loan applications in process of $630.2 million at May 31, 2010. Loans in process for which interest rates were committed to the borrowers and builder commitments for loan programs totaled approximately $286.2 million as of May 31, 2010. Substantially all of these commitments were for periods of 60 days or less. Since a portion of these commitments is expected to expire without being exercised by the borrowers or because borrowers may not meet certain criteria at the time of closing, the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Our Lennar Financial Services segment uses mandatory mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) forward commitments, option contracts and investor commitments to hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk associated with MBS forward commitments, option contracts and loan sales transactions is managed by limiting our counterparties to investment banks, federally regulated bank affiliates and other investors meeting our credit standards. Our risk, in the event of default by the purchaser, is the difference between the contract price and fair value of the MBS forward commitments and option contracts. At May 31, 2010, we had open commitments amounting to $372.1 million to sell MBS with varying settlement dates through August 2010.

(3) New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 16 of our condensed consolidated financial statements included under Item 1 of this Report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to our Company.

(4) Critical Accounting Policies

We believe that there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during the six months ended May 31, 2010, as compared to those we disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009, except for the following accounting policies that were updated as a result of the implementation of certain new provisions of ASC 810 and as a result of the operations of our new reportable segment, Rialto Investments.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

GAAP requires the consolidation of VIEs in which an enterprise has a controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest will have both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Our variable interest in VIEs may be in the form of (1) equity ownership, (2) contracts to purchase assets, (3) management services and development agreements between us and a VIE, (4) loans provided by us to a VIE or other partner and/or (5) guarantees provided by members to banks and other third parties. We examine specific criteria and use our judgment when determining if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions, representation on a VIE’s executive committee, existence of unilateral kick-out rights or voting rights, level of economic disproportionality between us and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.

Generally, all major decision making in our joint ventures is shared between all partners. In particular, business plans and budgets are generally required to be unanimously approved by all partners. Usually, management and other fees earned by us are nominal and believed to be at market and there is no significant economic disproportionality between us and other partners. Generally, we purchase less than a majority of the JV’s assets and the purchase prices under our option contracts are believed to be at market.

64


Generally, Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities become VIEs and consolidate when the other partner(s) lack the intent and financial wherewithal to remain in the entity. As a result, we continue to fund operations and debt paydowns through partner loans or substituted capital contributions.

Rialto Investments - Loans Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality

ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality , (“ASC 310-30”) applies to a loan with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. For loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, such as the FDIC portfolio of loans, management determined the value based on extensive due diligence on the loans, the underlying properties and the borrowers, as well as through various valuation methodologies. Factors considered in the valuation were projected cash flows for the loans, type of loan and related collateral, classification status and current discount rates. While the estimates are based on projections, all estimates are subjective and can change due to unexpected changes in economic conditions and loan performance.

Rialto Investments - Accretable Yield

Under ASC 310-30, loans were pooled together according to common risk characteristics. The excess of the cash flows expected to be collected from the loans receivable at acquisition over the initial investment for those loans receivable is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the expected life of the pools primarily using the constant effective yield method. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. Changes in the expected cash flows of loans receivable from the date of acquisition will either impact the accretable yield or result in a charge to the provision for loan losses in the period in which the changes become probable. Prepayments are treated as a reduction of cash flows expected to be collected and a reduction of contractually required payments such that the nonaccretable difference is not affected. Subsequent material decreases to the expected cash flows related to loan impairment will generally result in a charge to the provision for loan losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses, and a reclassification from accretable yield to nonaccretable difference. Subsequent increases in cash flows will result in a recovery of any previously recorded allowance for loan losses, to the extent applicable, and a reclassification from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield. Certain amounts related to the ASC 310-30 loans are estimates and may change as the Company obtains additional information related to the respective loans. While the cash flows are based on projections, they are subjective and can change due to unexpected changes in economic conditions and loan performance.

65


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our investments, debt obligations, loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment. We utilize forward commitments and option contracts to mitigate the risks associated with our mortgage loan portfolio.

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, our market risks with regard to debt related to our operations changed. In February 2010, our Rialto Investments segment acquired indirectly 40% managing member equity interests in two limited liability companies (“LLCs”) in partnership with the FDIC. The LLCs are considered variable interest entities and we were determined to be the primary beneficiary and therefore we consolidated the LLCs. Under the terms of the transaction the FDIC provided $626.9 million of notes guaranteed by the FDIC with 0% interest, which are non-recourse to us. In April 2010, we issued $250 million of 6.95% senior notes due 2018 and $276.5 million of 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020. In May 2010, we repurchased $289.4 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2010, 2011 and 2013 through a tender offer.

The following table provides principal cash flows and related weighted average effective interest rates by expected maturity dates and estimated fair values at May 31, 2010 for our Lennar Homebuilding senior notes and other debts payable, Lennar Financial Services notes and other debts payable and Rialto Investments notes payable. Weighted average variable interest rates are based on the variable interest rates at May 31, 2010.

Information Regarding Interest Rate Sensitivity

Principal (Notional) Amount by

Expected Maturity and Average Interest Rate

May 31, 2010

Six Months
Ending
November 30,
Years Ending November 30, Fair Value at
May  31,

2010
(Dollars in millions) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Thereafter Total

LIABILITIES:

Lennar Homebuilding:

Senior notes and other
debts payable:

Fixed rate

$ 108.6 129.4 4.7 266.5 270.1 505.5 1,167.7 2,452.5 2,432.0

Average interest rate

5.0 % 5.7 % 4.9 % 5.9 % 5.7 % 5.6 % 7.5 % 6.5 %

Variable rate

$ 162.0 34.7 178.3 51.3 10.4 1.0 437.7 437.7

Average interest rate

2.3 % 2.6 % 4.1 % 3.8 % 5.5 % 3.5 % 3.3 %

Lennar Financial Services:

Notes and other
debts payable:

Fixed rate

$ 0.1 0.1 0.1

Average interest rate

8.0 % 8.0 %

Variable rate

$ 161.0 161.0 161.0

Average interest rate

4.0 % 4.0 %

Rialto Investments:

Notes payable:

Fixed rate

$ 156.9 314.0 156.0 626.9 589.1

Average interest rate

0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %

66


Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer participated in an evaluation by our management of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our fiscal quarter that ended on May 31, 2010. Based on their participation in that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of May 31, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or furnished under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Our CEO and CFO also participated in an evaluation by our management of any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended May 31, 2010. That evaluation did not identify any changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Not applicable.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There were no material changes to our risk factors from those previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009.

Items 2 - 5. Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

31.1. Rule 13a-14(a) certification by Stuart A. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer.
31.2. Rule 13a-14(a) certification by Bruce E. Gross, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
32. Section 1350 certifications by Stuart A. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Bruce E. Gross, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

67


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Lennar Corporation
(Registrant)
Date: July 9, 2010 /s/ Bruce E. Gross
Bruce E. Gross
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 9, 2010 /s/ David M. Collins
David M. Collins
Controller
TABLE OF CONTENTS