LEN 10-Q Quarterly Report Feb. 28, 2011 | Alphaminr

LEN 10-Q Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2011

LENNAR CORP /NEW/
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2025
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2024
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2024
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2023
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2023
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2022
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2022
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2021
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2021
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2020
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2020
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2019
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2019
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2018
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2018
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2017
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2017
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2016
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2016
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2015
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2015
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2014
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2014
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2013
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2013
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2012
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 29, 2012
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2011
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2011
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Aug. 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended May 31, 2010
10-Q
Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2010
10-K
Fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2009
PROXIES
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 28, 2025
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 29, 2024
DEF 14A
Filed on March 1, 2023
DEF 14A
Filed on March 1, 2022
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 25, 2021
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 26, 2020
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 28, 2019
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 28, 2018
DEF 14A
Filed on March 7, 2017
DEF 14A
Filed on March 2, 2016
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 24, 2015
DEF 14A
Filed on Feb. 27, 2014
DEF 14A
Filed on March 1, 2013
DEF 14A
Filed on March 2, 2012
DEF 14A
Filed on March 3, 2011
DEF 14A
Filed on March 4, 2010
10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011

Commission File Number: 1-11749

Lennar Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 95-4337490

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

700 Northwest 107th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(305) 559-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES ¨ NO x

Common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2011:

Class A  155,630,004

Class B    31,303,197


Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

February 28,
2011 (1)
November 30,
2010 (1)

ASSETS

Lennar Homebuilding:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 1,014,000 1,207,247

Restricted cash

7,448 8,195

Receivables, net

61,258 82,202

Inventories:

Finished homes and construction in progress

1,629,764 1,491,292

Land and land under development

2,230,240 2,223,300

Consolidated inventory not owned

436,768 455,016

Total inventories

4,296,772 4,169,608

Investments in unconsolidated entities

642,874 626,185

Other assets

316,406 307,810
6,338,758 6,401,247

Rialto Investments:

Cash and cash equivalents

82,961 76,412

Defeasance cash to retire notes payable

125,559 101,309

Loans receivable

1,025,826 1,219,314

Real estate owned, net

446,245 258,104

Investments in unconsolidated entities

100,220 84,526

Other assets

37,859 37,949
1,818,670 1,777,614

Lennar Financial Services

423,056 608,990

Total assets

$ 8,580,484 8,787,851

(1) Under certain provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, Consolidations , (“ASC 810”) the Company is required to separately disclose on its condensed consolidated balance sheets the assets of consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) that are owned by the consolidated VIEs and non-recourse liabilities of consolidated VIEs.

As of February 28, 2011, total assets include $2,297.4 million related to consolidated VIEs of which $36.1 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents, $0.2 million in Lennar Homebuilding restricted cash, $5.3 million in Lennar Homebuilding receivables, net, $232.9 million in Lennar Homebuilding finished homes and construction in progress, $372.7 million in Lennar Homebuilding land and land under development, $82.4 million in Lennar Homebuilding consolidated inventory not owned, $39.5 million in Lennar Homebuilding investments in unconsolidated entities, $155.3 million in Lennar Homebuilding other assets, $75.1 million in Rialto Investments cash and cash equivalents, $125.6 million in Rialto Investments defeasance cash to retire notes payable, $796.1 million in Rialto Investments loans receivable, $362.2 million in Rialto Investments real estate owned, net and $14.0 million in Rialto Investments other assets.

As of November 30, 2010, total assets include $2,300.2 million related to consolidated VIEs of which $34.1 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents, $0.2 million in Lennar Homebuilding restricted cash, $6.6 million in Lennar Homebuilding receivables, net, $221.7 million in Lennar Homebuilding finished homes and construction in progress, $400.7 million in Lennar Homebuilding land and land under development, $87.4 million in Lennar Homebuilding consolidated inventory not owned, $38.8 million in Lennar Homebuilding investments in unconsolidated entities, $159.5 million in Lennar Homebuilding other assets, $72.4 million in Rialto Investments cash and cash equivalents, $101.3 million in Rialto Investments defeasance cash to retire notes payable, $974.4 million in Rialto Investments loans receivable, $188.5 million in Rialto Investments real estate owned, net and $14.6 million in Rialto Investments other assets.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — (Continued)

(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

February 28,
2011 (2)
November 30,
2010 (2)

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Lennar Homebuilding:

Accounts payable

$ 147,046 168,006

Liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned

367,086 384,233

Senior notes and other debts payable

3,129,065 3,128,154

Other liabilities

645,541 694,142
4,288,738 4,374,535

Rialto Investments:

Notes payable and other liabilities

769,490 770,714

Lennar Financial Services

289,270 448,219

Total liabilities

5,347,498 5,593,468

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

Class A common stock of $0.10 par value per share; Authorized: February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010 – 300,000,000 shares; Issued: February 28, 2011 – 167,295,873 and November 30, 2010 – 167,009,774 shares

16,730 16,701

Class B common stock of $0.10 par value per share; Authorized: February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010 – 90,000,000 shares; Issued: February 28, 2011 – 32,982,817 and November 30, 2010 – 32,970,914 shares

3,298 3,297

Additional paid-in capital

2,321,800 2,310,339

Retained earnings

914,045 894,108

Treasury stock, at cost; February 28, 2011 – 11,665,494 Class A common shares and 1,679,620 Class B common shares; November 30, 2010 – 11,664,744 Class A common shares and 1,679,620 Class B common shares

(615,496 ) (615,496 )

Total stockholders’ equity

2,640,377 2,608,949

Noncontrolling interests

592,609 585,434

Total equity

3,232,986 3,194,383

Total liabilities and equity

$ 8,580,484 8,787,851

(2) As of February 28, 2011, total liabilities include $925.4 million related to consolidated VIEs as to which there was no recourse against the Company, of which $13.8 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding accounts payable, $54.3 million in Lennar Homebuilding liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned, $188.0 million in Lennar Homebuilding senior notes and other debts payable, $35.1 million in Lennar Homebuilding other liabilities and $634.2 million in Rialto Investments notes payable and other liabilities.

As of November 30, 2010, total liabilities include $963.3 million related to consolidated VIEs as to which there was no recourse against the Company, of which $32.4 million is included in Lennar Homebuilding accounts payable, $60.6 million in Lennar Homebuilding liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned, $185.4 million in Lennar Homebuilding senior notes and other debts payable, $53.1 million in Lennar Homebuilding other liabilities and $631.8 million in Rialto Investments notes payable and other liabilities.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended
February 28,
2011 2010

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 466,709 520,776

Lennar Financial Services

57,713 53,365

Rialto Investments

33,623 301

Total revenues

558,045 574,442

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding

447,763 501,965

Lennar Financial Services

56,530 54,266

Rialto Investments

28,349 1,403

Corporate general and administrative

23,352 22,640

Total costs and expenses

555,994 580,274

Lennar Homebuilding equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities

8,661 (8,894 )

Lennar Homebuilding other income, net (1)

29,960 14,203

Other interest expense

(22,079 ) (18,665 )

Rialto Investments equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities

4,525 143

Rialto Investments other income, net

13,203

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

36,321 (19,045 )

Benefit for income taxes

2,405 11,572

Net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests)

$ 38,726 (7,473 )

Less: Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (2)

11,320 (950 )

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar

$ 27,406 (6,523 )

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.15 (0.04 )

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.14 (0.04 )

Cash dividends per each Class A and Class B common share

$ 0.04 0.04

(1) Lennar Homebuilding other income, net for the three months ended February 28, 2011 includes $8.3 million of valuation adjustments to the Company’s investments in Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities.
(2) Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three months ended February 28, 2011 includes $12.0 million of earnings related to the FDIC’s interest in the portfolio of real estate loans that the Company acquired in partnership with the FDIC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

Three months ended
February 28,
2011 2010

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests)

$ 38,726 (7,473 )

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) (including net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests) to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

3,767 2,904

Amortization of discount/premium on debt, net

4,061 382

Lennar Homebuilding equity in (earnings) loss from unconsolidated entities

(8,661 ) 8,894

Distributions of earnings from Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

1,322

Rialto Investments equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities

(4,525 ) (143 )

Distributions of earnings from Rialto Investments unconsolidated entities

1,503 96

Share-based compensation expense

6,730 6,298

Excess tax benefits from share-based awards

(258 )

Gain on retirement of Lennar Homebuilding senior notes and other debt

(8,904 )

Gains on Rialto Investments real estate owned

(17,375 )

Gains on Rialto Investments commercial mortgage-backed securities

(276 )

Valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs, other receivables and other assets

18,014 8,921

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

3,214 (1,875 )

Decrease in receivables

43,694 185,643

Increase in inventories, excluding valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs

(81,071 ) (91,553 )

(Increase) decrease in other assets

(13,851 ) 16,800

Decrease in Lennar Financial Services loans held-for-sale

110,412 41,783

Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities

(95,751 ) (72,357 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

9,675 89,416

Cash flows from investing activities:

Increase in restricted cash related to cash collateralized letters of credit

(164,150 )

Net (additions) disposals of operating properties and equipment

8 (1,920 )

Investments in and contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

(25,177 ) (15,816 )

Distributions of capital from Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

7,630 9,542

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments unconsolidated entities

(10,575 ) (41,315 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments consolidated entities (net of $54.0 million cash and cash equivalents consolidated at February 28, 2010)

(211,059 )

Increase in Rialto Investments defeasance cash to retire notes payable

(24,250 )

Receipts of principal payments on Rialto Investments loans receivable

49,954

Proceeds from sales of Rialto Investments real estate owned

7,792

Improvements in Rialto Investments real estate owned

(2,718 )

Decrease in Lennar Financial Services loans held-for-investment, net

197 611

Purchases of Lennar Financial Services investment securities

(5,126 ) (202 )

Proceeds from sales and maturities of Lennar Financial Services investment securities

129 200

Net cash used in investing activities

(2,136 ) (424,109 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net repayments under Lennar Financial Services debt

(149,339 ) (105,172 )

Partial redemption of senior notes

(38,275 )

Proceeds from other borrowings

75 1,163

Principal payments on other borrowings

(27,838 ) (45,118 )

Exercise of land option contracts from an unconsolidated land investment venture

(10,855 ) (16,070 )

Receipts related to noncontrolling interests

115 5,127

Payments related to noncontrolling interests

(4,789 ) (3,127 )

Excess tax benefits from share-based awards

258

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — (Continued)

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

Three months ended
February 28,
2011 2010

Common stock:

Issuances

4,754 890

Repurchases

(1,573 )

Dividends

(7,469 ) (7,386 )

Net cash used in financing activities

(195,088 ) (209,541 )

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

$ (187,549 ) (544,234 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,394,135 1,457,438

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 1,206,586 913,204

Summary of cash and cash equivalents:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 1,014,000 732,386

Lennar Financial Services

109,625 126,818

Rialto Investments

82,961 54,000
$ 1,206,586 913,204

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:

Non-cash contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

$ 14,098 2,023

Non-cash distributions from Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

$ 11,006

Purchases of inventories financed by sellers

$ 10,476 3,590

Rialto Investments real estate owned acquired in satisfaction of loans receivable

$ 175,875

Consolidations of newly formed or previously unconsolidated entities, net:

Loans receivable

$ 1,217,294

Inventories

$ 18,621 8,517

Investments in Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities

$ (525 )

Investments in Rialto Investments consolidated entities

$ (211,059 )

Other assets

$ 18,268

Debts payable

$ (14,703 ) (635,147 )

Other liabilities

$ (2,864 ) (285 )

Noncontrolling interests

$ (529 ) (397,588 )

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

Basis of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lennar Corporation and all subsidiaries, partnerships and other entities in which Lennar Corporation has a controlling interest and VIEs (see Note 15) in which Lennar Corporation is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (the “Company”). The Company’s investments in both unconsolidated entities in which a significant, but less than controlling, interest is held and in VIEs in which the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, are accounted for by the equity method. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been made.

The Company has historically experienced, and expects to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. The condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2011 is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2011 presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(2) Operating and Reporting Segments

The Company’s operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments, based primarily upon similar economic characteristics, geography and product type. The Company’s reportable segments consist of:

(1) Homebuilding East

(2) Homebuilding Central

(3) Homebuilding West

(4) Homebuilding Houston

(5) Lennar Financial Services

(6) Rialto Investments

Information about homebuilding activities in states which are not economically similar to other states in the same geographic area is grouped under “Homebuilding Other,” which is not considered a reportable segment.

7


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Evaluation of segment performance is based primarily on operating earnings (loss) before income taxes. Operations of the Company’s homebuilding segments primarily include the construction and sale of single-family attached and detached homes, as well as the purchase, development and sale of residential land directly and through the Company’s unconsolidated entities. Operating earnings (loss) for the homebuilding segments consist of revenues generated from the sales of homes and land, equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities and other income (expense), net, less the cost of homes sold and land sold, selling, general and administrative expenses and other interest expense of the segment. The Company’s reportable homebuilding segments and all other homebuilding operations not required to be reported separately have operations located in:

East: Florida, Maryland, New Jersey and Virginia

Central: Arizona, Colorado and Texas (1)

West: California and Nevada

Houston: Houston, Texas

Other: Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina and South Carolina

(1) Texas in the Central reportable segment excludes Houston, Texas, which is its own reportable segment.

Operations of the Lennar Financial Services segment include primarily mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services for both buyers of the Company’s homes and others. Substantially all of the loans the Lennar Financial Services segment originates are sold within a short period in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis. After the loans are sold, the Company retains potential liability for possible claims by purchasers that it breached certain limited industry-standard representations and warranties in the loan sale agreements. Lennar Financial Services’ operating earnings consist of revenues generated primarily from mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services, less the cost of such services and certain selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by the segment. The Lennar Financial Services segment operates generally in the same states as the Company’s homebuilding operations, as well as in other states.

Operations of the Rialto Investments (“Rialto”) segment include sourcing, underwriting, pricing, managing and ultimately monetizing real estate and real estate related assets, as well as providing similar services to others in markets across the country. Rialto’s operating earnings (loss) consists of revenues generated primarily from accretable interest income associated with portfolios of real estate loans acquired in partnership with the FDIC and other portfolios of real estate loans and assets acquired, fees for sub-advisory services, other income, net, consisting primarily of gains upon foreclosure of real estate owned (“REO”) and gains on sale of REO, and equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities, less the costs incurred by the segment for managing portfolios, providing advisory services, underwriting expenses related to both completed and abandoned transactions, and other general administrative expenses.

Each reportable segment follows the same accounting policies described in Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operational results of each segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented.

8


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Financial information relating to the Company’s operations was as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets:

Homebuilding East

$ 1,550,463 1,524,095

Homebuilding Central

702,335 716,595

Homebuilding West

2,139,678 2,051,888

Homebuilding Houston

239,915 226,749

Homebuilding Other

736,337 737,486

Rialto Investments (1)

1,818,670 1,777,614

Lennar Financial Services

423,056 608,990

Corporate and unallocated

970,030 1,144,434

Total assets

$ 8,580,484 8,787,851

(1) Consists primarily of assets of consolidated VIEs (see Note 8).

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues:

Homebuilding East

$ 188,464 142,060

Homebuilding Central

67,006 66,083

Homebuilding West

96,382 164,317

Homebuilding Houston

52,953 75,794

Homebuilding Other

61,904 72,522

Lennar Financial Services

57,713 53,365

Rialto Investments

33,623 301

Total revenues (1)

$ 558,045 574,442

Operating earnings (loss):

Homebuilding East

$ 11,020 20,523

Homebuilding Central

(15,124 ) (7,247 )

Homebuilding West (2)

49,345 (7,892 )

Homebuilding Houston

(41 ) 5,454

Homebuilding Other

(9,712 ) (5,383 )

Lennar Financial Services

1,183 (901 )

Rialto Investments

23,002 (959 )

Total operating earnings

59,673 3,595

Corporate and unallocated

(23,352 ) (22,640 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

$ 36,321 (19,045 )

(1) Total revenues are net of sales incentives of $62.9 million ($33,100 per home delivered) for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to $73.7 million ($37,100 per home delivered) for the three months ended February 28, 2010.
(2) For the three months ended February 28, 2011, operating earnings include $37.5 million related to the receipt of a litigation settlement, as well as $15.4 million related to the Company’s share of a gain on debt extinguishment and the recognition of $10.0 million of previously deferred management fee income related to a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity.

9


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Valuation adjustments and write-offs relating to the Company’s homebuilding operations were as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Valuation adjustments to finished homes, CIP and land on which the Company intends to build homes:

East

$ 731 297

Central

3,876 1,099

West

14 689

Houston

49 60

Other

142 3,924

Total

4,812 6,069

Valuation adjustments to land the Company intends to sell or has sold to third parties:

East

20

Central

23 1,334

Houston

10

Total

53 1,334

Write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs:

Houston

81

Total

81

Company’s share of valuation adjustments related to assets of unconsolidated entities:

Central

371

West

1,660 1,216

Other

2,495

Total

4,526 1,216

Valuation adjustments to investments in unconsolidated entities:

East

8,262

Total

8,262

Write-offs of other receivables and other assets:

Other

4,806 1,518

Total

4,806 1,518

Total valuation adjustments and write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs, other receivables and other assets

$ 22,540 10,137

The Company recorded higher valuation adjustments during the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010, as a result of changes in strategy and other developments regarding certain of the Company’s joint ventures. Demand trends in many communities in which the Company is selling homes has remained depressed and/or decreased despite improved affordability resulting from lower home prices and historically low interest rates. If these trends continue and there is further deterioration in the housing market, it may cause additional pricing pressures and slower absorption. This may potentially lead to additional valuation adjustments in the future. In addition, market conditions may cause the Company to re-evaluate its strategy regarding certain assets that could result in further valuation adjustments and/or additional write-offs of option deposits and pre-acquisition costs due to abandonment of those options contracts.

10


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(3) Lennar Homebuilding Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method was as follows:

Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues

$ 67,063 56,755

Costs and expenses

88,580 79,180

Other income

123,007

Net earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities

$ 101,490 (22,425 )

The Company’s share of net earnings (loss) recognized (1)

$ 8,661 (8,894 )

(1) For the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Company’s share of net earnings recognized includes a $15.4 million gain related to the Company’s share of a $123.0 million gain on debt extinguishment at a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity, partially offset by $4.5 million of valuation adjustments related to assets of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities.

Balance Sheets

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 75,768 82,573

Inventories

3,286,866 3,371,435

Other assets

315,280 307,244
$ 3,677,914 3,761,252

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 275,652 327,824

Debt

1,142,480 1,284,818

Equity

2,259,782 2,148,610
$ 3,677,914 3,761,252

In 2007, the Company sold a portfolio of land to a strategic land investment venture with Morgan Stanley Estate Fund II, L.P., an affiliate of Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., in which the Company has a 20% ownership interest and 50% voting rights. Due to the Company’s continuing involvement, the transaction did not qualify as a sale by the Company under GAAP; thus, the inventory has remained on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet in consolidated inventory not owned. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the portfolio of land (including land development costs) of $407.0 million and $424.5 million, respectively, is also reflected as inventory in the summarized condensed financial information related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities.

The Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which the Company has investments usually finance their activities with a combination of partner equity and debt financing. In some instances, the Company and its partners have guaranteed debt of certain unconsolidated entities.

11


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

The summary of the Company’s net recourse exposure related to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which the Company has investments was as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Several recourse debt – repayment

$ 70,432 33,399

Several recourse debt – maintenance

16,399 29,454

Joint and several recourse debt – repayment

48,365 48,406

Joint and several recourse debt – maintenance

43,466 61,591

The Company’s maximum recourse exposure

178,662 172,850

Less: joint and several reimbursement agreements with the Company’s partners

(57,167 ) (58,878 )

The Company’s net recourse exposure

$ 121,495 113,972

During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Company’s maximum recourse exposure related to indebtedness of Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities increased by $5.8 million, which includes a $36.3 million increase for consideration given in the form of a several guarantee in connection with the favorable debt maturity extension and principal reduction at Heritage Fields El Toro, one of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities as discussed in the table below. This increase was partially offset by reductions in the Company’s maximum recourse exposure with regard to other unconsolidated entities, of which $2.3 million was paid by the Company primarily through capital contributions to unconsolidated entities and $28.2 million primarily related to the consolidation of a joint venture, the restructuring of a guarantee and the joint ventures selling inventory.

As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the Company had $6.9 million and $10.2 million, respectively, of obligation guarantees accrued as a liability on its condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the liability was reduced by $2.6 million related to a change in estimate of a previously accrued obligation guarantee and by a $0.7 million cash payment related to another obligation guarantee previously recorded. The obligation guarantees are estimated based on current facts and circumstances and any unexpected changes may lead the Company to incur additional obligation guarantees in the future.

The recourse debt exposure in the previous table represents the Company’s maximum recourse exposure to loss from guarantees and does not take into account the underlying value of the collateral or the other assets of the borrowers that are available to repay the debt or to reimburse the Company for any payments on its guarantees. The Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities that have recourse debt have a significant amount of assets and equity. The summarized balance sheets of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities with recourse debt were as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets (1)

$ 2,269,922 990,028

Liabilities (1)

954,906 487,606

Equity (1)

1,315,016 502,422

(1) In the three months ended February 28, 2011, Heritage Fields El Toro, one of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities, extended the maturity of its $573.5 million debt without recourse to Lennar until 2018. In exchange for the extension and partial debt extinguishment, which reduced the outstanding debt balance to $481.0 million as of February 28, 2011, all the partners agreed to provide a limited several repayment guarantee on the outstanding debt, which resulted in a $36.3 million increase to the Company’s maximum recourse exposure and a subsequent increase to assets, liabilities and equity of Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities that have recourse debt. In addition, the Company recognized a $15.4 million gain for its share of the $123.0 million gain on debt extinguishment.

12


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

In addition, in most instances in which the Company has guaranteed debt of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity, the Company’s partners have also guaranteed that debt and are required to contribute their share of the guarantee payments. Some of the Company’s guarantees are repayment guarantees and some are maintenance guarantees. In a repayment guarantee, the Company and its venture partners guarantee repayment of a portion or all of the debt in the event of default before the lender would have to exercise its rights against the collateral. In the event of default, if the Company’s venture partner does not have adequate financial resources to meet its obligations under the reimbursement agreement, the Company may be liable for more than its proportionate share, up to its maximum recourse exposure, which is the full amount covered by the joint and several guarantee. The maintenance guarantees only apply if the value of the collateral (generally land and improvements) is less than a specified percentage of the loan balance. If the Company is required to make a payment under a maintenance guarantee to bring the value of the collateral above the specified percentage of the loan balance, the payment would constitute a capital contribution or loan to the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity and increase the Company’s investment in the unconsolidated entity and its share of any funds the unconsolidated entity distributes.

In connection with many of the loans to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, the Company and its joint venture partners (or entities related to them) have been required to give guarantees of completion to the lenders. Those completion guarantees may require that the guarantors complete the construction of the improvements for which the financing was obtained. If the construction is to be done in phases, the guarantee generally is limited to completing only the phases as to which construction has already commenced and for which loan proceeds were used.

During the three months ended February 28, 2011, there were: (1) payments of $1.7 million under the Company’s maintenance guarantees and (2) other loan paydowns of $0.6 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under the Company’s repayment guarantees. During the three months ended February 28, 2010, there were: (1) no payments under maintenance guarantees and (2) other loan paydowns of $5.9 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under the Company’s repayment guarantees. During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, there were no payments under completion guarantees.

As of February 28, 2011, the fair values of the maintenance guarantees, repayment guarantees and completion guarantees were not material. The Company believes that as of February 28, 2011, in the event it becomes legally obligated to perform under a guarantee of the obligation of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity due to a triggering event under a guarantee, most of the time the collateral should be sufficient to repay at least a significant portion of the obligation or the Company and its partners would contribute additional capital into the venture. In certain instances, the Company has placed performance letters of credit and surety bonds with municipalities for its joint ventures (see Note 11).

The total debt of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which the Company has investments was as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

The Company’s net recourse exposure

$ 121,495 113,972

Reimbursement agreements from partners

57,167 58,878

The Company’s maximum recourse exposure

$ 178,662 172,850

Non-recourse bank debt and other debt (partner’s share of several recourse)

$ 176,229 79,921

Non-recourse land seller debt or other debt

60,620 58,604

Non-recourse debt with completion guarantees

505,069 600,297

Non-recourse debt without completion guarantees

221,900 373,146

Non-recourse debt to the Company

963,818 1,111,968

Total debt

$ 1,142,480 1,284,818

The Company’s maximum recourse exposure as a % of total JV debt

16 % 13 %

13


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(4) Equity and Comprehensive Earnings (Loss)

The following table reflects the changes in equity attributable to both Lennar Corporation and the noncontrolling interests of its consolidated subsidiaries in which it has less than a 100% ownership interest for both the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010:

Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands) Total
Equity
Class A
Common Stock
Class B
Common Stock
Additional Paid
in Capital
Treasury
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Noncontrolling
Interests

Balance at November 30, 2010

$ 3,194,383 16,701 3,297 2,310,339 (615,496 ) 894,108 585,434

Net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests)

38,726 27,406 11,320

Employee stock and directors plans

6,123 29 1 6,093

Amortization of restricted stock

5,368 5,368

Cash dividends

(7,469 ) (7,469 )

Receipts related to noncontrolling interests

115 115

Payments related to noncontrolling interests

(4,789 ) (4,789 )

Lennar Homebuilding non-cash consolidations

529 529

Balance at February 28, 2011

$ 3,232,986 16,730 3,298 2,321,800 (615,496 ) 914,045 592,609

Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands) Total
Equity
Class A
Common Stock
Class B
Common Stock
Additional Paid
in Capital
Treasury
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Noncontrolling
Interests

Balance at November 30, 2009

$ 2,588,014 16,515 3,296 2,208,934 (613,690 ) 828,424 144,535

Net loss (including net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests)

(7,473 ) (6,523 ) (950 )

Employee stock and directors plans

1,305 8 1 2,869 (1,573 )

Amortization of restricted stock

4,316 4,316

Cash dividends

(7,386 ) (7,386 )

Receipts related to noncontrolling interests

5,127 5,127

Payments related to noncontrolling interests

(3,127 ) (3,127 )

Rialto Investments non-cash consolidations

397,588 397,588

Balance at February 28, 2010

$ 2,978,364 16,523 3,297 2,216,119 (615,263 ) 814,515 543,173

Comprehensive earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar for both the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 was the same as net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar. Comprehensive earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests for both the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 was the same as net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests.

The Company has a stock repurchase program which permits the purchase of up to 20 million shares of its outstanding common stock. During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, there were no repurchases of common stock under the stock repurchase program. As of February 28, 2011, 6.2 million shares of common stock can be repurchased in the future under the program.

During the three months ended February 28, 2011, treasury stock increased by an immaterial amount of common shares.

14


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(5) Income Taxes

A reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance is required, if based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed periodically based on the more-likely-than-not realization threshold criterion. In the assessment for a valuation allowance, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, the Company’s experience with loss carryforwards not expiring unused and tax planning alternatives.

Based upon all available evidence, during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company recorded a reversal of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $8.5 million primarily due to the net earnings generated during the period. At February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $601.0 million and $609.5 million, respectively. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion or all of the Company’s deferred tax assets will be realized.

At February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the Company had $49.3 million and $46.0 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits. If the Company were to recognize its gross unrecognized tax benefits as of February 28, 2011, $29.8 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.

The Company expects the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by $25.0 million within twelve months as a result of settlements with various taxing authorities and the expiration of certain statutes of limitations.

At February 28, 2011, the Company had $26.7 million accrued for interest and penalties, of which $3.7 million was recorded during the three months ended February 28, 2011. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the accrual for interest and penalties was reduced by $5.2 million as a result of the settlement of state tax nexus issues. At November 30, 2010, the Company had $28.2 million accrued for interest and penalties.

During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits increased by $12.6 million related to a settlement for certain losses carried back to prior years as well as retroactive changes in certain state tax laws. There was also a decrease to the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits of $9.3 million as a result of the settlement of certain state tax nexus issues. This resulted in a net increase of gross unrecognized tax benefits of $3.3 million and an increase in the Company’s effective tax rate from (22.58%) to (9.62%).

The IRS is currently examining the Company’s federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2005 through 2010, and certain state taxing authorities are examining various fiscal years. The final outcome of these examinations is not yet determinable. The statute of limitations for the Company’s major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for fiscal year 2003 and subsequent years.

15


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(6) Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.

Under certain provisions of ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share , all outstanding nonvested shares that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents that participate in undistributed earnings with common stock are considered participating securities and are included in computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s restricted common stock (“nonvested shares”) are considered participating securities. For the three months ended February 28, 2010, the nonvested shares were excluded from the calculation of the denominator for diluted loss per share because including them would be anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss during the period.

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share were calculated as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 2011 2010

Numerator:

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar

$ 27,406 (6,523 )

Less: distributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares

101 87

Less: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares

269

Numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share

27,036 (6,610 )

Plus: interest on 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

871

Plus: undistributed earnings allocated to convertible shares

269

Less: undistributed earnings reallocated to convertible shares

265

Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per share

$ 27,911 (6,610 )

Denominator:

Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share – weighted average common shares outstanding

184,155 182,660

Effect of dilutive securities:

Shared based payments

699

2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

10,005

Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share – weighted average common shares outstanding

194,859 182,660

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.15 (0.04 )

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$ 0.14 (0.04 )

Options to purchase 1.2 million and 5.9 million shares, respectively, in total of Class A and Class B common stock were outstanding and anti-dilutive for the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010.

16


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(7) Lennar Financial Services Segment

The assets and liabilities related to the Lennar Financial Services segment were as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets :

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 109,625 110,476

Restricted cash

18,743 21,210

Receivables, net (1)

60,675 136,672

Loans held-for-sale (2)

134,758 245,404

Loans held-for-investment, net

21,633 21,768

Investments held-to-maturity

8,162 3,165

Goodwill

34,046 34,046

Other (3)

35,414 36,249
$ 423,056 608,990

Liabilities :

Notes and other debts payable

$ 122,339 271,678

Other (4)

166,931 176,541
$ 289,270 448,219

(1) Receivables, net primarily relate to loans sold to investors for which the Company had not yet been paid as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively.
(2) Loans held-for-sale relate to unsold loans carried at fair value.
(3) Other assets include mortgage loan commitments carried at fair value of $4.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively, as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Other assets also include forward contracts carried at fair value of $2.9 million as of November 30, 2010.
(4) Other liabilities include forward contracts carried at fair value of $1.8 million as of February 28, 2011.

At February 28, 2011, the Lennar Financial Services segment had a warehouse repurchase facility with a maximum aggregate commitment of $150 million and an additional uncommitted amount of $50 million that matures in February 2012, and another warehouse repurchase facility with a maximum aggregate commitment of $175 million that matures in July 2011. The maximum aggregate commitment under these facilities totaled $325 million as of February 28, 2011.

The Lennar Financial Services segment uses these facilities to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold to investors and expects the facilities to be renewed or replaced with other facilities when they mature. Borrowings under the facilities were $122.3 million and $271.6 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, and were collateralized by mortgage loans and receivables on loans sold to investors but not yet paid for with outstanding principal balances of $128.8 million and $286.0 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. If the facilities are not renewed, the borrowings under the lines of credit will be paid off by selling the mortgage loans held-for-sale to investors and by collecting on receivables on loans sold but not yet paid. Without the facilities, the Lennar Financial Services segment would have to use cash from operations and other funding sources to finance its lending activities.

Substantially all of the loans the Lennar Financial Services segment originates are sold within a short period in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis. After the loans are sold, the Company retains potential liability for possible claims by purchasers that it breached certain limited industry-standard representations and warranties in the loan sale agreement. There has been an increased industry-wide effort by purchasers to defray their losses in an unfavorable economic environment by purporting to have found inaccuracies related to sellers’ representations and warranties in particular loan sale agreements. The Company’s mortgage operations have established liabilities for anticipated losses associated with mortgage loans previously originated and sold to investors. The Company establishes liabilities for such anticipated losses based upon, among other things, an analysis of repurchase requests received, an estimate of potential repurchase claims not yet received, its actual past repurchases and losses through the disposition of affected loans. While the Company believes that it has adequately reserved for known losses and projected repurchase requests, given the volatility in the mortgage industry and the uncertainty regarding the

17


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

ultimate resolution of these claims, if either actual repurchases or the losses incurred resolving those repurchases exceed the Company’s expectations, additional recourse expense may be incurred. Loan origination liabilities are included in Lennar Financial Services’ liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The activity in the Company’s loan origination liabilities was as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Loan origination liabilities, beginning of the year

$ 9,872 9,518

Provision for losses during the period

70 69

Adjustments to pre-existing provision for losses from changes in estimates

(70 ) (69 )

Payments/settlements

(2,625 )

Loan origination liabilities, end of period

$ 9,872 6,893

For Lennar Financial Services loans held-for-investment, net, a loan is deemed impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Interest income is not accrued or recognized on impaired loans unless payment is received. Impaired loans are written-off if and when the loan is no longer secured by collateral. The total unpaid principal balance of the impaired loans as of February 28, 2011 was $9.3 million. At February 28, 2011, the recorded investment in both the impaired loans and impaired loans with a valuation allowance was $4.0 million, including an allowance of $5.3 million. The average recorded investment in impaired loans totaled approximately $4 million for the three months ended February 28, 2011.

(8) Rialto Investments Segment

The assets and liabilities related to the Rialto segment were as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets :

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 82,961 76,412

Defeasance cash to retire notes payable

125,559 101,309

Loans receivable

1,025,826 1,219,314

Real estate owned, net

446,245 258,104

Investments in unconsolidated entities

100,220 84,526

Investments held-to-maturity

19,813 19,537

Other

18,046 18,412
$ 1,818,670 1,777,614

Liabilities :

Notes payable

$ 752,302 752,302

Other

17,188 18,412
$ 769,490 770,714

Rialto’s operating earnings (loss) for the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues

$ 33,623 301

Costs and expenses

28,349 1,403

Rialto Investments equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities

4,525 143

Rialto Investments other income, net

13,203

Operating earnings (loss) (1)

$ 23,002 (959 )

(1) Operating earnings (loss) for the three months ended February 28, 2011 includes $12.0 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

18


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Loans Receivable

In February 2010, the Rialto segment acquired indirectly 40% managing member equity interests in two limited liability companies (“LLCs”), in partnership with the FDIC. The LLCs hold performing and non-performing loans formerly owned by 22 failed financial institutions and when the Rialto segment acquired its interests in the LLCs, the two portfolios consisted of approximately 5,500 distressed residential and commercial real estate loans (“FDIC Portfolios”). The FDIC retained 60% equity interests in the LLCs and provided $626.9 million of financing with 0% interest, which is non-recourse to the Company and the LLCs. As of February 28, 2011, the notes payable balance was $626.9 million; however, $125.6 million of cash collections on loans in excess of expenses has been deposited in a defeasance account, established for the repayment of the notes payable, under the agreement with the FDIC. The funds in the defeasance account will be used to retire the notes payable upon their maturity.

The LLCs met the accounting definition of VIEs and since the Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidated the LLCs. At February 28, 2011, these consolidated LLCs had total combined assets and liabilities of $1.4 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively.

In September 2010, the Rialto segment acquired approximately 400 distressed residential and commercial real estate loans (“Bank Portfolios”) and over 300 real estate owned (“REO”) properties from three financial institutions. The Company paid $310 million for the distressed real estate and real estate related assets of which $125 million was financed through a 5-year senior unsecured note provided by one of the selling institutions.

The following table displays the loans receivable by aggregate collateral type:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Land

$ 488,057 565,861

Single family homes

254,519 318,783

Commercial properties

212,828 239,182

Multi-family homes

54,857 59,951

Other

15,565 35,537

Loans receivable

$ 1,025,826 1,219,314

In accordance with loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality , (“ASC 310-30”), the Rialto segment estimated the cash flows, at acquisition, it expected to collect on the FDIC Portfolios and Bank Portfolios. In accordance with GAAP, the difference between the contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. This difference is neither accreted into income nor recorded on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loans using the effective yield method.

Subsequent to acquisition of the FDIC Portfolios and Bank Portfolios, the Rialto segment evaluates periodically its estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. These evaluations require the continued use of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Subsequent changes in the estimated cash flows expected to be collected may result in changes in the accretable yield and nonaccretable difference or reclassifications from nonaccretable yield to accretable yield. Increases in the cash flows expected to be collected will generally result in an increase in interest income over the remaining life of the loan or pool of loans. Decreases in expected cash flows due to further credit deterioration will generally result in an impairment charge recognized as a provision for loan losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses.

19


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

The following table displays the outstanding balance and carrying value of loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Outstanding balance

$ 2,281,953 2,558,709

Carrying value

$ 832,015 966,098

The activity in the accretable yield for the FDIC Portfolios and Bank Portfolios for the three months ended February 28, 2011 was as follows:

(In thousands) Accretable Yield

Balance at November 30, 2010

$ 396,311

Additions

11,443

Deletions

(35,065 )

Accretions

(32,343 )

Balance at February 28, 2011

$ 340,346

Disposal of loans which may include sales of loans, receipts of payments in full by the borrower or foreclosure, result in removal of the loans from the accretable yield portfolios.

At February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, there were loans receivable with a carrying value of approximately $194 million and $253 million, respectively, for which interest income was not being recognized as they were classified as nonaccrual. When forecasted principal and interest cannot be reasonably estimated at the loan acquisition date, management classifies the loan as nonaccrual and accounts for these assets in accordance with ASC 310-10, Receivables , (“ASC 310-10”). When a loan is classified as nonaccrual, any subsequent cash receipt is accounted for using either the cost recovery or cash basis method. In accordance with ASC 310-10, a loan is considered impaired when based on current information and events it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. Although these loans meet the definition of ASC 310-10, these loans are not considered impaired relative to the Company’s recorded investment since they were acquired at a substantial discount to their unpaid principal balance and there currently is no allowance on any of these loans. A provision for loan losses is recognized when the recorded investment in the loan is in excess of its fair value. The fair value of the loan is determined by using either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loans obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell. At both February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the Company did not have an allowance for loan losses against the nonaccrual loans as the fair value of the underlying collateral was at least equal to the nonaccrual loans’ carrying value.

The following table represents nonaccrual loans accounted for under ASC 310-10 aggregate by collateral type as of February 28, 2011:

Recorded Investment

(In thousands)

Collateral Type

Unpaid
Principal  Balance
With
Allowance
Without
Allowance
Total Recorded
Investment

Land

$ 222,017 81,140 81,140

Single family homes

92,828 44,810 44,810

Commercial properties

96,602 52,565 52,565

Multi-family homes

29,072 11,450 11,450

Other

11,180 3,846 3,846

Total

$ 451,699 193,811 193,811

The average recorded investment in these loans totaled approximately $224 million for the three months ended February 28, 2011.

20


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

The loans receivable portfolios consist of loans acquired at a discount. Based on the nature of these loans, the portfolios are managed by assesing the risks related to the likelihood of collection of payments from borrowers and guarantors, as well as monitoring the value of the underlying collateral. The following are the risk categories for the loans receivable portfolios:

Accrual —Loans in which forecasted cash flows under the loan agreement, as it might be modified from time to time, can be reasonably estimated at the date of acquisition. The risk associated with loans in this category relates to the possible default by the borrower with respect to principal and interest payments and thus a decline in the forecasted cash flows used to determine accretable yield income and the recognition of an impairment through an allowance for loan losses.

Nonaccrual —Loans in which forecasted principal and interest could not be reasonably estimated at the date of acquisition. Although the Company believes the recorded investment balance will ultimately be realized, the risk of nonaccrual loans relates to a decline in the value of the collateral securing the outstanding obligation and the recognition of an impairment through an allowance for loan losses if the recorded investment in the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral. As of February 28, 2011, the Company had no recorded allowance on these loans.

Risk categories as of February 28, 2011 were as follows:

(In thousands)

Collateral Type

Accrual Nonaccrual Total

Land

$ 406,917 81,140 488,057

Single family homes

209,709 44,810 254,519

Commercial properties

160,263 52,565 212,828

Multi-family homes

43,407 11,450 54,857

Other

11,719 3,846 15,565

Total

$ 832,015 193,811 1,025,826

In order to assess the risk associated with each risk category, the Rialto segment evaluates the forecasted cash flows and the value of the underlying collateral securing loans receivable on a quarterly basis or when an event occurs that suggests a decline in the assets’ fair value.

21


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Real Estate Owned

The acquisition of properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are reported within the condensed consolidated balance sheets as real estate owned. When a property is determined to be held-and-used, the asset is recorded at fair value and depreciated over its useful life using the straight line method. When certain criteria set forth in ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment , are met; the property is classified as held-for-sale. When a real estate asset is classified as held-for-sale, the property is carried at the lower of its cost basis or fair value less estimated costs to sell. The Rialto segment had no valuation allowances and recorded no impairments during the three months ended February 28, 2011. Valuation allowances on REO held-for-sale are based on updated appraisals of the underlying properties or management’s best estimate of fair value. The following table presents the changes in REO (both held-for-sale and held-and-used) for the three months ended February 28, 2011:

(In thousands) Real Estate
Owned

Balance at November 30, 2010 (1)

$ 258,104

Additions

192,984

Improvements

2,718

Sales

(7,526 )

Depreciation

(35 )

Balance at February 28, 2011 (1)

$ 446,245

(1) At February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, REO includes $15.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively, of REO held-and-used.

For the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Company recorded approximately $17.4 million of gains primarily from acquisitions of real estate through foreclosure. The gains associated with real estate owned are recorded in Rialto Investments other income, net.

Investments

In addition to the acquisition and management of the FDIC Portfolios and Bank Portfolios, an affiliate in the Rialto segment is a sub-advisor to the AllianceBernstein L.P. (“AB”) fund formed under the Federal government’s Public-Private Investment Program (“PPIP”) and receives management fees for sub-advisory services. The Company also made a commitment of $75 million in the AB PPIP fund of which the remaining outstanding commitment as of February 28, 2011 was $11.2 million. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the AB PPIP fund was $80.4 million and $77.3 million, respectively.

In November 2010, the Rialto segment completed its first closing of a real estate investment fund (the “Fund”) with initial equity commitments of approximately $300 million (including $75 million committed by the Company). During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Company contributed $10.6 million to the Fund. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Fund invested $41.5 million for the acquisition of two distressed real estate asset portfolios. The combined portfolios include approximately 80 real estate loans with a total aggregate unpaid principal balance of approximately $125 million. As of February 28, 2011, the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the Fund was $10.6 million.

In November 2010, the Rialto segment invested in approximately $43 million of non-investment grade commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) for $19.4 million, representing a 55% discount to par value. The CMBS have a stated and assumed final distribution date of November 2020 and a stated maturity date of October 2057. In accordance with GAAP, the Rialto segment reviews changes in estimated cash flows periodically, to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred on its investment securities. Based on the Rialto segment’s assessment, no impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended February 28, 2011. The carrying value of the investment securities at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, was $19.8 million and $19.5 million, respectively.

Additionally, another subsidiary in the Rialto segment also has approximately a 5% investment in a service and infrastructure provider to the residential home loan market (the “Servicer Provider”), which provides services to the consolidated LLCs. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the Servicer Provider was $9.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively.

22


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Rialto’s investments in unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method was as follows:

Balance Sheets

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 56,537 42,793

Investment securities

4,617,758 4,341,226

Other assets

171,838 181,600
$ 4,846,133 4,565,619

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 250,231 110,921

Partner loans

137,820 137,820

Debt due to the U.S. Treasury

1,955,000 1,955,000

Equity

2,503,082 2,361,878
$ 4,846,133 4,565,619
Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues

$ 116,888 84,187

Costs and expenses

51,471 89,450

Other income, net

86,788

Net earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities

$ 152,205 (5,263 )

Rialto Investments’ share of net earnings recognized

$ 4,525 143

(9) Lennar Homebuilding Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010 included $11.7 million and $19.2 million, respectively, of cash held in escrow for approximately three days.

(10) Lennar Homebuilding Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of customer deposits on home sales held in restricted accounts until title transfers to the homebuyer, as required by the state and local governments in which the homes were sold.

(11) Lennar Homebuilding Senior Notes and Other Debts Payable

(Dollars in thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

5.95% senior notes due 2011

$ 113,207 113,189

5.95% senior notes due 2013

266,319 266,319

5.50% senior notes due 2014

248,657 248,657

5.60% senior notes due 2015

501,109 501,216

6.50% senior notes due 2016

249,803 249,788

12.25% senior notes due 2017

393,356 393,031

6.95% senior notes due 2018

247,450 247,323

2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020

276,500 276,500

2.75% convertible senior notes due 2020

378,993 375,875

Mortgage notes on land and other debt

453,671 456,256
$ 3,129,065 3,128,154

23


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

The Company has a $150 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement (“LC Agreement”) with certain financial institutions. The LC Agreement may be increased to $200 million, although there are currently no commitments for the additional $50 million. The Company believes it was in compliance with its debt covenants at February 28, 2011.

The Company’s performance letters of credit outstanding were $74.8 million and $78.9 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. The Company’s financial letters of credit outstanding were $201.9 million and $195.0 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Performance letters of credit are generally posted with regulatory bodies to guarantee the Company’s performance of certain development and construction activities, and financial letters of credit are generally posted in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts, for insurance risks, credit enhancements and as other collateral. Additionally, at February 28, 2011, the Company had outstanding performance and surety bonds related to site improvements at various projects (including certain projects of the Company’s joint ventures) of $710.0 million. Although significant development and construction activities have been completed related to these site improvements, these bonds are generally not released until all development and construction activities are completed. As of February 28, 2011, there were approximately $331.4 million, or 47%, of costs to complete related to these site improvements. The Company does not presently anticipate any draws upon these bonds, but if any such draws occur, the Company does not believe they would have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2010, the Company issued $446.0 million of 2.75% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2.75% Convertible Senior Notes”) at a price of 100% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after payment of expenses, were $436.4 million. The net proceeds were or will be used for general corporate purposes, including repayments or repurchases of existing senior notes or other indebtedness. The 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes are convertible into cash, shares of Class A common stock or a combination of both, at the Company’s election. However, it is the Company’s intent to settle the face value of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes in cash. Holders may convert the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes at the initial conversion rate of 45.1794 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount or 20,150,012 Class A common shares if all the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes are converted, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $22.13 per share of Class A common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. The shares are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share primarily because it is the Company’s intent to settle the face value of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes in cash and the Company’s stock price does not exceed the conversion price.

Holders of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes will have the right to convert them, during any fiscal quarter commencing after the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2010 (and only during such fiscal quarter), if the last reported sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day. Holders of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase them for cash equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest, on December 15, 2015. The Company will have the right to redeem the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes at any time on or after December 20, 2015 for 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest. Interest on the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes is due semi-annually beginning June 15, 2011. The 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated, but are currently guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s significant wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiaries.

For its 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes, the Company will be required to pay contingent interest with regard to any interest period beginning with the interest period commencing December 20, 2015 and ending June 14, 2016, and for each subsequent six-month period commencing on an interest payment date to, but excluding, the next interest payment date, if the average trading price of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes during the five consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately preceding the first day of the applicable interest period exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes. The amount of contingent interest payable per $1,000 principal amount of notes during the applicable interest period will equal 0.75% per year of the average trading price of such $1,000 principal amount of 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes during the five trading day reference period.

24


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Certain provisions under ASC Topic 470, Debt , require the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash on conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. The Company has applied these provisions to its 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes. At February 28, 2011, the principal amount of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes was $446.0 million, the unamortized discount included in stockholders’ equity was $67.0 million and the net carrying amount of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes was $379.0 million. The carrying amount of the equity component of the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes was $71.2 million at February 28, 2011.

In May 2010, the Company also issued $276.5 million of 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2.00% Convertible Senior Notes”) at a price of 100% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after payment of expenses, were $271.2 million. The net proceeds were or will be used for general corporate purposes, including repayments or repurchases of existing senior notes or other indebtedness. The 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes are convertible into shares of Class A common stock at any time prior to maturity or redemption at the initial conversion rate of 36.1827 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes or 10,004,517 Class A common shares if all the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes are converted, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $27.64 per share of Class A common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. The shares are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Holders of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase them for cash equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest, on each of December 1, 2013 and December 1, 2015. The Company will have the right to redeem the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes at any time on or after December 1, 2013 for 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued but unpaid interest. Interest on the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes is due semi-annually beginning December 1, 2010. The 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated, but are currently guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s significant wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiaries. At both February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the carrying amount of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes was $276.5 million.

For its 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes, the Company will be required to pay contingent interest with regard to any interest period commencing with the six-month interest period beginning December 1, 2013, if the average trading price of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes during the five consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately preceding the first day of the applicable six-month interest period equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes. The amount of contingent interest payable per $1,000 principal amount of notes during the applicable six-month interest period will equal 0.50% per year of the average trading price of such $1,000 principal amount of 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes during the five trading-day reference period.

25


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(12) Product Warranty

Warranty and similar reserves for homes are established at an amount estimated to be adequate to cover potential costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims expected to be incurred subsequent to the delivery of a home. Reserves are determined based on historical data and trends with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. The Company regularly monitors the warranty reserve and makes adjustments to its pre-existing warranties in order to reflect changes in trends and historical data as information becomes available. Warranty reserves are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The activity in the Company’s warranty reserve was as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Warranty reserve, beginning of period

$ 109,179 157,896

Warranties issued during the period

4,739 5,139

Adjustments to pre-existing warranties from changes in estimates

(2,727 ) (902 )

Payments

(7,215 ) (20,308 )

Warranty reserve, end of period

$ 103,976 141,825

As of February 28, 2011, the Company has identified approximately 950 homes delivered in Florida primarily during its 2006 and 2007 fiscal years that are confirmed to have defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage. This represents a small percentage of homes the Company delivered nationally (1.1%) during those fiscal years. Defective Chinese drywall is an industry-wide issue as other homebuilders have publicly disclosed that they have experienced similar issues with defective Chinese drywall.

Based on its efforts to date, the Company has not identified defective Chinese drywall in homes delivered by the Company outside of Florida. The Company is continuing its investigation of homes delivered during the relevant time period in order to determine whether there are additional homes, not yet inspected, with defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage. If the outcome of the Company’s inspections identifies more homes than the Company has estimated to have defective Chinese drywall, it might require an increase in the Company’s warranty reserve in the future. The Company has replaced defective Chinese drywall when it has been found in homes the Company has built.

Through February 28, 2011, the Company has accrued $82.2 million of warranty reserves related to homes confirmed as having defective Chinese drywall, as well as an estimate for homes not yet inspected that may contain Chinese drywall. No additional amount was accrued during the three months ended February 28, 2011. As of February 28, 2011, the warranty reserve, net of payments, was $17.8 million. The Company has received, and continues to seek, reimbursement from its subcontractors, insurers and others for costs the Company has incurred or expects to incur to investigate and repair defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Company received payments of $1.3 million through third party recoveries relative to the costs it has incurred and expects to incur remedying the homes confirmed and estimated to have defective Chinese drywall and resulting damage.

26


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(13) Share-Based Payment

During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, compensation expense related to the Company’s share-based payment awards was as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Stock options

$ 1,362 1,982

Nonvested shares

5,368 4,316

Total compensation expense for share-based awards

$ 6,730 6,298

During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not grant any stock options or nonvested shares.

(14) Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments held by the Company at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, using available market information and what the Company believes to be appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies might have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The table excludes cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, defeasance cash to retire notes payable, receivables, net and accounts payable, which had fair values approximating their carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments.

February 28, 2011 November 30, 2010
(In thousands) Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value

ASSETS

Rialto Investments:

Loans receivable

$ 1,025,826 1,109,944 1,219,314 1,411,731

Investments held-to-maturity

$ 19,813 19,679 19,537 19,537

Lennar Financial Services:

Loans held-for-investment, net

$ 21,633 22,323 21,768 23,083

Investments held-to-maturity

$ 8,162 8,171 3,165 3,177

LIABILITIES

Lennar Homebuilding:

Senior notes and other debts payable

$ 3,129,065 3,325,101 3,128,154 3,153,106

Rialto Investments:

Notes payable

$ 752,302 709,632 752,302 719,703

Lennar Financial Services:

Notes and other debts payable

$ 122,339 122,339 271,678 271,678

The following methods and assumptions are used by the Company in estimating fair values:

Lennar Homebuilding —For senior notes and other debts payable, the fair value of fixed-rate borrowings is based on quoted market prices. The Company’s variable-rate borrowings are tied to market indices and approximate fair value due to the short maturities associated with the majority of the instruments.

Rialto Investments —The fair values for loans receivable is based on discounted cash flows as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, or the fair value of the collateral. The fair value for investments held-to-maturity is based on discounted cash flows as of February 28, 2011. The fair value for investments held-to-maturity as of November 30, 2010 approximated the carrying value as the investments were acquired just prior to November 30, 2010. For notes payable, the fair value of the zero percent notes guaranteed by the FDIC was calculated based on a 5-year treasury yield as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively, and the fair value of other notes payable was calculated based on discounted cash flows using the Company’s weighted average borrowing rate.

27


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Lennar Financial Services —The fair values above are based on quoted market prices, if available. The fair values for instruments that do not have quoted market prices are estimated by the Company on the basis of discounted cash flows or other financial information.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP provides a framework for measuring fair value, expands disclosures about fair value measurements and establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value summarized as follows:

Level 1 Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2 Fair value determined using significant other observable inputs.

Level 3 Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs.

The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are all within the Lennar Financial Services segment and are summarized below:

Financial Instruments

Fair Value
Hierarchy
Fair Value at
February 28, 2011
Fair Value at
November 30, 2010
(In thousands)

Loans held-for-sale (1)

Level 2 $ 134,758 245,404

Mortgage loan commitments

Level 2 $ 3,966 1,449

Forward contracts

Level 2 $ (1,761 ) 2,905

(1) The aggregate fair value of loans held-for-sale of $134.8 million at February 28, 2011 exceeds their aggregate principal balance of $130.3 million by $4.5 million. The aggregate fair value of loans held-for-sale of $245.4 million at November 30, 2010, exceeds their aggregate principal balance of $240.8 million by $4.6 million.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments have been determined by using available market information and what the Company believes to be appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies might have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The following methods and assumptions are used by the Company in estimating fair values:

Loans held-for-sale —Fair value is based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices for other mortgage whole loans with similar characteristics. Management believes carrying loans held-for-sale at fair value improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring the fair value of the loans and the derivatives instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. In addition, the Company recognizes the fair value of its rights to service a mortgage loan as revenue upon entering into an interest rate lock loan commitment with a borrower, in accordance with ASC Topic 815-10-S99. The fair value of these servicing rights is included in Lennar Financial Services’ loans held-for-sale as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Fair value of the servicing rights is determined based on value in the servicing sales contracts.

Mortgage loan commitments —Fair value of commitments to originate loans is based upon the difference between the current value of similar loans and the price at which the Lennar Financial Services segment has committed to originate the loans. The fair value of commitments to sell loan contracts is the estimated amount that the Lennar Financial Services segment would receive or pay to terminate the commitments at the reporting date based on market prices for similar financial instruments.

28


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Forward contracts —Fair value is based on quoted market prices for similar financial instruments.

The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are its investments in unconsolidated entities for which the Company has recorded valuation adjustments during the three months ended February 28, 2011 and Rialto Investments real estate owned assets. The assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:

Non-financial assets

Fair Value
Hierarchy
Fair Value Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
(In thousands)

Lennar Homebuilding:

Investments in unconsolidated entities (2)

Level 3 $ 529 (8,262 )

Rialto Investments:

Real estate owned (3)

Level 3 $ 192,984 17,109

(1) Represents total losses due to valuation adjustments and total gains from acquisitions of real estate through foreclosure recorded during the three months ended February 28, 2011.
(2) Lennar Homebuilding investments in unconsolidated entities with an aggregate carrying value of $8.8 million were written down to their fair value of $0.5 million. The valuation adjustments were included in Lennar Homebuilding other income, net in the Company’s statement of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2011.
(3) Real estate owned assets are initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the time of acquisition through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure. Upon acquisition, the real estate owned assets had a carrying value of $175.9 million and a fair value of $193.0 million. The fair value of the real estate owned assets is based upon the appraised value at the time of foreclosure or management’s best estimate. The gains upon acquisition of REO were $17.1 million and are included within Rialto Investments other income, net in the Company’s statement of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2011.

The Company evaluates its investments in unconsolidated entities for indicators of impairment during each reporting period. A series of operating losses of an investee or other factors may indicate that a decrease in value of the Company’s investment in the unconsolidated entity has occurred which is other-than-temporary. The amount of impairment recognized is the excess of the investment’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value.

The evaluation of the Company’s investment in unconsolidated entities includes certain critical assumptions made by management: (1) projected future distributions from the unconsolidated entities, (2) discount rates applied to the future distributions and (3) various other factors.

The Company’s assumptions on the projected future distributions from the unconsolidated entities are dependent on market conditions. Specifically, distributions are dependent on cash to be generated from the sale of inventory by the unconsolidated entities. Such inventory is also reviewed for potential impairment by the unconsolidated entities. The unconsolidated entities generally use a discount rate of approximately 20% in their reviews for impairment, subject to the perceived risks associated with the community’s cash flow streams relative to its inventory. If a valuation adjustment is recorded by an unconsolidated entity related to its assets, the Company’s proportionate share is reflected in the Company’s homebuilding equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities with a corresponding decrease to its investment in unconsolidated entities. In certain instances, the Company may be required to record additional losses relating to its investment in unconsolidated entities, if the Company’s investment in the unconsolidated entity, or a portion thereof, is deemed to be other than temporarily impaired. These losses are included in Lennar Homebuilding other income, net.

Additionally, the Company considers various qualitative factors to determine if a decrease in the value of the investment is other-than-temporary. These factors include age of the venture, intent and ability for the Company to recover its investment in the entity, financial condition and long-term prospects of the entity, short-term liquidity needs of the unconsolidated entity, trends in the general economic environment of the land, entitlement status of the land held by the unconsolidated entity, overall projected returns on investment, defaults under contracts with third parties (including bank debt), recoverability of the investment through future cash flows and relationships with the other partners and banks. If the Company believes that the decline in the fair value of the investment is temporary, then no impairment is recorded.

29


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

REO represents real estate which the Rialto segment has taken control or has effective control of in partial or full satisfaction of loans receivable. At the time of acquisition through foreclosure of a loan, REO is recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell if classified as held-for-sale and at fair value if classified as held-and-used, which becomes the property’s new basis. The fair values of these assets are determined in part by placing reliance on third party appraisals of the properties and/or internally prepared analysis of recent offers or prices on comparable properties in the proximate vicinity. The third party appraisals and internally developed analysis are significantly impacted by the local market economy, market supply and demand, competitive conditions and prices on comparable properties, adjusted for date of sale, location, property size, etc. Each REO is unique and is analyzed in the context of the particular market where the property is located. In order to establish the significant assumptions for a particular REO, the Company analyzes historical trends, including trends achieved by the Company’s local homebuilding operations, if applicable, and current trends in the market and economy impacting the REO. Using available trend information, the Company then calculates its best estimate of fair value, which can include projected cash flows discounted at a rate the Company believes a market participant would determine to be commensurate with the inherent risks associated with the assets and related estimated cash flow streams.

Changes in economic factors, consumer demand and market conditions, among other things, could materially impact estimates used in the third party appraisals and/or internally prepared analysis of recent offers or prices on comparable properties. Thus, estimates can differ significantly from the amounts ultimately realized by the Rialto segment from disposition of these assets. The amount by which the recorded investment in the loan is less than the REO’s fair value (net of estimated cost to sell if held-for-sale), is recorded as a gain on foreclosure within Rialto Investments’ other income, net, in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations. The amount by which the recorded investment in the loan is greater than the REO’s fair value (net of estimated cost to sell if held-for-sale), is initially recorded as a loan impairment within Rialto Investments’ costs and expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations and upon foreclosure the amount of the impairment is charged off against the related reserve.

(15) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

GAAP requires the consolidation of VIEs in which an enterprise has a controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest will have both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The Company’s variable interest in VIEs may be in the form of (1) equity ownership, (2) contracts to purchase assets, (3) management and development agreements between the Company and a VIE, (4) loans provided by the Company to a VIE or other partner and/or (5) guarantees provided by members to banks and other third parties. The Company examines specific criteria and uses its judgment when determining if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions, representation on a VIE’s executive committee, existence of unilateral kick-out rights or voting rights, level of economic disproportionality between the Company and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.

Generally, all major decision making in the Company’s joint ventures is shared between all partners. In particular, business plans and budgets are generally required to be unanimously approved by all partners. Usually, management and other fees earned by the Company are nominal and believed to be at market and there is no significant economic disproportionality between the Company and other partners. Generally, the Company purchases less than a majority of the joint venture’s assets and the purchase prices under the Company’s option contracts are believed to be at market.

30


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Generally, Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities become VIEs and consolidate when the other partner(s) lack the intent and financial wherewithal to remain in the entity. As a result, the Company continues to fund operations and debt paydowns through partner loans or substituted capital contributions.

The Company evaluated all joint venture agreements as of February 28, 2011. Based on the Company’s evaluation, it consolidated entities within its Lennar Homebuilding segment that at February 28, 2011 had total combined assets and liabilities of $18.6 million and $17.6 million, respectively. In addition, during the three months ended February 28, 2011, there were no VIEs that were deconsolidated.

At February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the Company’s recorded investments in Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities were $642.9 million and $626.2 million, respectively, and the Rialto segment’s investments in unconsolidated entities as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010 were $100.2 million and $84.5 million, respectively.

Consolidated VIEs

As of February 28, 2011, the carrying amounts of the VIEs’ assets and non-recourse liabilities that consolidated were $2,297.4 million and $925.4 million, respectively. Those assets are owned by, and those liabilities are obligations of, the VIEs, not the Company.

A VIE’s assets can only be used to settle obligations of that VIE. The VIEs are not guarantors of Company’s senior notes and other debts payable. In addition, the assets held by a VIE usually are collateral for that VIE’s debt. The Company and other partners do not generally have an obligation to make capital contributions to a VIE unless the Company and/or the other partner(s) have entered into debt guarantees with a VIE’s banks. Other than debt guarantee agreements with a VIE’s banks, there are no liquidity arrangements or agreements to fund capital or purchase assets that could require the Company to provide financial support to a VIE. While the Company has option contracts to purchase land from certain of its VIEs, the Company is not required to purchase the assets and could walk away from the contract.

Unconsolidated VIEs

At February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the Company’s recorded investment in VIEs that are unconsolidated and its estimated maximum exposure to loss were as follows:

As of February 28, 2011
(In thousands) Investments in
Unconsolidated
VIEs
Lennar’s
Maximum
Exposure to Loss

Lennar Homebuilding (1)

$ 63,531 93,649

Rialto Investments (2)

109,458 120,762

Total

$ 172,989 214,411

As of November 30, 2010
(In thousands) Investments in
Unconsolidated
VIEs
Lennar’s
Maximum
Exposure to Loss

Lennar Homebuilding (1)

$ 144,809 174,967

Rialto Investments (2)

104,063 117,631

Total

$ 248,872 292,598

(1) At both February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the maximum exposure to loss of Lennar Homebuilding’s investments in unconsolidated VIEs is limited to its investment in the unconsolidated VIEs in addition to $30.0 million of recourse debt of one of the unconsolidated VIEs.
(2)

For Rialto’s investment in unconsolidated VIEs, the Company made a $75 million commitment to fund capital in the AB PPIP fund. As of both February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the

31


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

Company had contributed $63.8 million of the $75 million commitment and it cannot walk away from its remaining commitment to fund capital. Therefore, as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the maximum exposure to loss for Rialto’s unconsolidated VIEs was higher than the carrying amount of its investments. In addition, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, investments in unconsolidated VIEs and Lennar’s maximum exposure to loss include $19.8 million and $19.5 million, respectively, related to Rialto’s investments held-to-maturity.

While these entities are VIEs, the Company has determined that the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance is generally shared. While the Company generally manages the day-to-day operations of the VIEs, each of the VIEs has an executive committee made up of representatives from each partner. The members of the executive committee have equal votes and major decisions require unanimous consent and approval from all members. The Company does not have the unilateral ability to exercise participating voting rights without partner consent. Furthermore, the Company’s economic interest is not significantly disproportionate to the point where it would indicate that the Company has the power to direct these activities.

The Company and other partners do not generally have an obligation to make capital contributions to the VIEs, except for the Company’s $11.2 million remaining commitment to the AB PPIP fund and $30.0 million of recourse debt of one of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated VIEs. The Company and the other partners did not guarantee any debt of these unconsolidated VIEs. There are no liquidity arrangements or agreements to fund capital or purchase assets that could require the Company to provide financial support to the VIEs. While the Company has option contracts to purchase land from certain of its unconsolidated VIEs, the Company is not required to purchase the assets and could walk away from the contract.

Option Contracts

The Company has access to land through option contracts, which generally enables it to control portions of properties owned by third parties (including land funds) and unconsolidated entities until the Company has determined whether to exercise the option.

A majority of the Company’s option contracts require a non-refundable cash deposit or irrevocable letter of credit based on a percentage of the purchase price of the land. The Company’s option contracts sometimes include price adjustment provisions, which adjust the purchase price of the land to its approximate fair value at the time of acquisition or are based on the fair value at the time of takedown.

The Company’s investments in option contracts are recorded at cost unless those investments are determined to be impaired, in which case the Company’s investments are written down to fair value. The Company reviews option contracts for indicators of impairment during each reporting period. The most significant indicator of impairment is a decline in the fair value of the optioned property such that the purchase and development of the optioned property would no longer meet the Company’s targeted return on investment with appropriate consideration given to the length of time available to exercise the option. Such declines could be caused by a variety of factors including increased competition, decreases in demand or changes in local regulations that adversely impact the cost of development. Changes in any of these factors would cause the Company to re-evaluate the likelihood of exercising its land options.

Some option contracts contain a predetermined take-down schedule for the optioned land parcels. However, in almost all instances, the Company is not required to purchase land in accordance with those take-down schedules. In substantially all instances, the Company has the right and ability to not exercise its option and forfeit its deposit without further penalty, other than termination of the option and loss of any unapplied portion of its deposit and pre-acquisition costs. Therefore, in substantially all instances, the Company does not consider the take-down price to be a firm contractual obligation.

When the Company does not intend to exercise an option, it writes off any unapplied deposit and pre-acquisition costs associated with the option contract.

32


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

The Company evaluates all option contracts for land to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Although the Company does not have legal title to the optioned land, if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, it is required to consolidate the land under option at the purchase price of the optioned land. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the effect of consolidation of these option contracts was a net increase of $5.3 million to consolidated inventory not owned with a corresponding increase to liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2011. To reflect the purchase price of the inventory consolidated, the Company reclassified the related option deposits from land under development to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2011. The liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned primarily represent the difference between the option exercise prices for the optioned land and the Company’s cash deposits. The increase to consolidated inventory not owned was offset by the Company exercising its options to acquire land under certain contracts previously consolidated resulting in a net decrease in consolidated inventory not owned of $18.2 million for the three months ended February 28, 2011.

The Company’s exposure to loss related to its option contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities consisted of its non-refundable option deposits and pre-acquisition costs totaling $154.7 million and $157.4 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Additionally, the Company had posted $48.8 million and $48.9 million, respectively, of letters of credit in lieu of cash deposits under certain option contracts as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010.

(16) New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements , (“ASU 2010-06”), which requires additional disclosures about transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 for its second quarter ended May 31, 2010, except for the Level 3 activity disclosures which will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning December 1, 2011. ASU 2010-06 has not and is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures About the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses , (“ASU 2010-20”). ASU 2010-20 enhances current disclosure requirements to assist users of financial statements in assessing an entity’s credit risk exposure and evaluating the adequacy of an entity’s allowance for credit losses. ASU 2010-20 requires entities to disclose the nature of credit risk inherent in their finance receivables, the procedure for analyzing and assessing credit risk, and the changes in both the receivables and the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment and class. ASU 2010-20 was effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning December 1, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring , (“ASU 2011-02”). ASU 2011-02 clarifies when a loan modification or restructuring is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). In determining whether a loan modification represents a TDR, an entity should consider whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulty and the lender has granted a concession to the borrower. This guidance is to be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted. ASU 2011-02 is effective for loan modifications that occur on or after September 1, 2011. The Company is evaluating the effect the ASU will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

33


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information

The indentures governing the principal amounts of the Company’s 5.95% senior notes due 2011, 5.95% senior notes due 2013, 5.50% senior notes due 2014, 5.60% senior notes due 2015, 6.50% senior notes due 2016, 12.25% senior notes due 2017, 6.95% senior notes due 2018, 2.00% convertible senior notes due 2020 and 2.75% convertible senior notes due 2020 require that, if any of the Company’s subsidiaries directly or indirectly guarantee at least $75 million principal amount of debt of Lennar Corporation, those subsidiaries must also guarantee Lennar Corporation’s obligations with regard to its senior notes. Until February 2010, the Company had a Credit Facility that required substantially all of the Company’s homebuilding subsidiaries guarantee Lennar Corporation’s obligations under the Credit Facility, and therefore, those subsidiaries also guaranteed the Company’s obligations with regard to its senior notes. The Company terminated the Credit Facility in February 2010, and because of that, there was a period when there were no guarantors of Lennar’s obligations with regard to its senior notes. However, subsequently, the Company entered into the LC Agreement that is guaranteed by all the Company’s significant homebuilding subsidiaries, but is not guaranteed by the Company’s finance company subsidiaries or by the Rialto segment subsidiaries. The entities referred to as “guarantors” in the following tables are subsidiaries that were guaranteeing the LC Agreement at February 28, 2011. Supplemental information for the guarantors is as follows:

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

February 28, 2011

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

ASSETS

Lennar Homebuilding:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and receivables, net

$ 909,420 131,678 41,608 1,082,706

Inventories

3,691,134 605,638 4,296,772

Investments in unconsolidated entities

603,411 39,463 642,874

Other assets

43,548 117,576 155,282 316,406

Investments in subsidiaries

3,351,636 572,656 (3,924,292 )
4,304,604 5,116,455 841,991 (3,924,292 ) 6,338,758

Rialto Investments

1,818,670 1,818,670

Lennar Financial Services

147,890 275,166 423,056

Total assets

$ 4,304,604 5,264,345 2,935,827 (3,924,292 ) 8,580,484

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Lennar Homebuilding:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 260,635 484,119 47,833 792,587

Liabilities related to consolidated inventory

not owned

367,086 367,086

Senior notes and other debts payable

2,675,394 199,929 253,742 3,129,065

Intercompany

(1,271,802 ) 811,720 460,082
1,664,227 1,862,854 761,657 4,288,738

Rialto Investments

769,490 769,490

Lennar Financial Services

49,855 239,415 289,270

Total liabilities

1,664,227 1,912,709 1,770,562 5,347,498

Stockholders’ equity

2,640,377 3,351,636 572,656 (3,924,292 ) 2,640,377

Noncontrolling interests

592,609 592,609

Total equity

2,640,377 3,351,636 1,165,265 (3,924,292 ) 3,232,986

Total liabilities and equity

$ 4,304,604 5,264,345 2,935,827 (3,924,292 ) 8,580,484

34


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

November 30, 2010

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

ASSETS

Lennar Homebuilding:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and receivables, net

$ 1,079,107 177,674 40,863 1,297,644

Inventories

3,547,152 622,456 4,169,608

Investments in unconsolidated entities

587,385 38,800 626,185

Other assets

48,776 99,486 159,548 307,810

Investments in subsidiaries

3,333,769 811,317 (4,145,086 )
4,461,652 5,223,014 861,667 (4,145,086 ) 6,401,247

Rialto Investments

91,270 335,148 1,351,196 1,777,614

Lennar Financial Services

149,413 459,577 608,990

Total assets

$ 4,552,922 5,707,575 2,672,440 (4,145,086 ) 8,787,851

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Lennar Homebuilding:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 298,985 479,617 83,546 862,148

Liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned

384,233 384,233

Senior notes and other debts payable

2,671,898 201,248 255,008 3,128,154

Intercompany

(1,037,694 ) 1,128,731 (91,037 )
1,933,189 2,193,829 247,517 4,374,535

Rialto Investments

10,784 128,136 631,794 770,714

Lennar Financial Services

51,841 396,378 448,219

Total liabilities

1,943,973 2,373,806 1,275,689 5,593,468

Stockholders’ equity

2,608,949 3,333,769 811,317 (4,145,086 ) 2,608,949

Noncontrolling interests

585,434 585,434

Total equity

2,608,949 3,333,769 1,396,751 (4,145,086 ) 3,194,383

Total liabilities and equity

$ 4,552,922 5,707,575 2,672,440 (4,145,086 ) 8,787,851

35


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended February 28, 2011

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 458,957 7,752 466,709

Lennar Financial Services

33,994 38,365 (14,646 ) 57,713

Rialto Investments

33,623 33,623

Total revenues

492,951 79,740 (14,646 ) 558,045

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding

434,220 15,635 (2,092 ) 447,763

Lennar Financial Services

35,770 32,337 (11,577 ) 56,530

Rialto Investments

28,349 28,349

Corporate general and administrative

22,231 1,121 23,352

Total costs and expenses

22,231 469,990 76,321 (12,548 ) 555,994

Lennar Homebuilding equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities

8,683 (22 ) 8,661

Lennar Homebuilding other income, net

9,676 29,951 (9,667 ) 29,960

Other interest expense

(11,765 ) (22,079 ) 11,765 (22,079 )

Rialto Investments equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities

4,525 4,525

Rialto Investments other income, net

13,203 13,203

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

(24,320 ) 39,516 21,125 36,321

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

13,109 (9,801 ) (903 ) 2,405

Equity in earnings from subsidiaries

38,617 8,902 (47,519 )

Net earnings (including net earnings
attributable to noncontrolling interests)

27,406 38,617 20,222 (47,519 ) 38,726

Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

11,320 11,320

Net earnings attributable to Lennar

$ 27,406 38,617 8,902 (47,519 ) 27,406

36


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended February 28, 2010

(In thousands) Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Revenues:

Lennar Homebuilding

$ 507,747 13,029 520,776

Lennar Financial Services

32,062 35,761 (14,458 ) 53,365

Rialto Investments

301 301

Total revenues

301 539,809 48,790 (14,458 ) 574,442

Costs and expenses:

Lennar Homebuilding

484,058 19,893 (1,986 ) 501,965

Lennar Financial Services

35,200 30,215 (11,149 ) 54,266

Rialto Investments

1,403 1,403

Corporate general and administrative

21,431 1,209 22,640

Total costs and expenses

22,834 519,258 50,108 (11,926 ) 580,274

Lennar Homebuilding equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(8,875 ) (19 ) (8,894 )

Other income, net

9,242 14,194 (9,233 ) 14,203

Other interest expense

(11,765 ) (18,665 ) 11,765 (18,665 )

Rialto Investments equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities

143 143

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

(24,913 ) 7,205 (1,337 ) (19,045 )

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

15,873 (4,608 ) 307 11,572

Equity in earnings (loss) from subsidiaries

2,517 (80 ) (2,437 )

Net earnings (loss) (including net loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests)

(6,523 ) 2,517 (1,030 ) (2,437 ) (7,473 )

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

(950 ) (950 )

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Lennar

$ (6,523 ) 2,517 (80 ) (2,437 ) (6,523 )

37


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Three Months Ended February 28, 2011

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests)

$ 27,406 38,617 20,222 (47,519 ) 38,726

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (including net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

(15,550 ) (187,700 ) 126,680 47,519 (29,051 )

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

11,856 (149,083 ) 146,902 9,675

Cash flows from investing activities:

Investments in and contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, net

(16,752 ) (795 ) (17,547 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments consolidated and unconsolidated entities, net

(10,575 ) (10,575 )

Increase in Rialto Investments defeasance cash to retire notes payable

(24,250 ) (24,250 )

Receipts of principal payments on Rialto Investments loans receivable

49,954 49,954

Other

(4,560 ) 4,842 282

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

(21,312 ) 19,176 (2,136 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net repayments under Lennar Financial Services debt

(5 ) (149,334 ) (149,339 )

Net repayments on other borrowings

(12,510 ) (15,253 ) (27,763 )

Exercise of land option contracts from

an unconsolidated land investment venture

(10,855 ) (10,855 )

Net payments related to noncontrolling interests

(4,674 ) (4,674 )

Excess tax benefits from share-based awards

258 258

Common stock:

Issuances

4,754 4,754

Repurchases

Dividends

(7,469 ) (7,469 )

Intercompany

(182,844 ) 162,765 20,079

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(185,301 ) 139,395 (149,182 ) (195,088 )

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(173,445 ) (31,000 ) 16,896 (187,549 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,071,542 179,215 143,378 1,394,135

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 898,097 148,215 160,274 1,206,586

38


Lennar Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(17) Supplemental Financial Information – (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Three Months Ended February 28, 2010

(In thousands)

Lennar
Corporation
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Total

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net earnings (loss) (including net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests)

$ (6,523 ) 2,517 (1,030 ) (2,437 ) (7,473 )

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) (including net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

69,607 (85,644 ) 110,489 2,437 96,889

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

63,084 (83,127 ) 109,459 89,416

Cash flows from investing activities:

Increase in restricted cash related to cash collateralized letters of credit

(164,150 ) (164,150 )

Increase in investments in Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, net

(6,010 ) (264 ) (6,274 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments unconsolidated entities

(41,315 ) (41,315 )

Investments in and contributions to Rialto Investments consolidated entities (net of $54,000 cash and cash equivalents consolidated)

(265,059 ) 54,000 (211,059 )

Other

(594 ) (566 ) (151 ) (1,311 )

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(471,118 ) (6,576 ) 53,585 (424,109 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net repayments under Lennar Financial Services debt

(11 ) (105,161 ) (105,172 )

Partial redemption of 5.125% senior notes due 2010

(38,275 ) (38,275 )

Net repayments on other borrowings

(25,191 ) (18,764 ) (43,955 )

Exercise of land option contracts from an unconsolidated land investment venture

(16,070 ) (16,070 )

Net receipts related to noncontrolling interests

2,000 2,000

Common stock:

Issuances

890 890

Repurchases

(1,573 ) (1,573 )

Dividends

(7,386 ) (7,386 )

Intercompany

(154,039 ) 117,584 36,455

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(200,383 ) 76,312 (85,470 ) (209,541 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(608,417 ) (13,391 ) 77,574 (544,234 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,223,169 154,313 79,956 1,457,438

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 614,752 140,922 157,530 913,204

39


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included under Item 1 of this Report and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2010.

Some of the statements in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies and prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those described under the caption “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by Federal securities laws.

Outlook

During the first quarter of 2011, despite operating in a challenging housing market, we reported diluted earnings per share of $0.14, making this our fourth consecutive quarter of profitability. As evidenced by a 12% year-over-year decline in new orders, we believe that the timing of the recovery and the degree of improvement in the housing market remain uncertain.

We remain focused on improving our core business. Our principal focus in our homebuilding operations continues to be maintaining and improving our gross profit margin on the homes we sell rather than increasing sales volume. We have taken steps over the past several years to reduce costs and right-size our overhead structure. Although selling, general and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of revenues from home sales in the first quarter, they continued to decline in absolute dollars. We continue to make carefully underwritten strategic acquisitions in well-positioned markets that will support our homebuilding operations going forward.

Along with our intense focus on our homebuilding operations, our Rialto Investments segment has continued to contribute earnings to our operating results in the first quarter of 2011, generating $23.0 million of pre-tax earnings (which included $12.0 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests). We continue to invest in new opportunities using conservative underwriting standards to generate high returns. We expect this segment to continue to be a growing component of our operating earnings in the future as we continue to evaluate and execute on potential opportunities.

Our strong balance sheet and significant liquidity puts us in an excellent position to purchase new strategic high margin land deals for our homebuilding operations and distressed opportunities for our Rialto operations. While it is unclear whether the spring selling season will gain momentum or continue its sluggish recovery, we believe that our Company is well positioned for a profitable year in fiscal 2011.

40


(1) Results of Operations

Overview

We historically have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. Our results of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Our net earnings attributable to Lennar were $27.4 million, or $0.15 per basic share and $0.14 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2011, compared to a net loss attributable to Lennar of $6.5 million, or $0.04 per basic and diluted share, in the first quarter of 2010. Our gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year, primarily due to reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales.

Financial information relating to our operations was as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Lennar Homebuilding revenues:

Sales of homes

$ 457,869 513,348

Sales of land

8,840 7,428

Total Lennar Homebuilding revenues

466,709 520,776

Lennar Homebuilding costs and expenses:

Cost of homes sold

366,199 414,972

Cost of land sold

6,389 6,075

Selling, general and administrative

75,175 80,918

Total Lennar Homebuilding costs and expenses

447,763 501,965

Lennar Homebuilding operating margins

18,946 18,811

Lennar Homebuilding equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities

8,661 (8,894 )

Lennar Homebuilding other income, net

29,960 14,203

Other interest expense

(22,079 ) (18,665 )

Lennar Homebuilding operating earnings

$ 35,488 5,455

Lennar Financial Services revenues

$ 57,713 53,365

Lennar Financial Services costs and expenses

56,530 54,266

Lennar Financial Services operating earnings (loss)

$ 1,183 (901 )

Rialto Investments revenues

$ 33,623 301

Rialto Investments costs and expenses

28,349 1,403

Rialto Investments equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities

4,525 143

Rialto Investments other income, net

13,203

Rialto Investments operating earnings (loss)

$ 23,002 (959 )

Total operating earnings

$ 59,673 3,595

Corporate general and administrative expenses

(23,352 ) (22,640 )

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

$ 36,321 (19,045 )

Revenues from home sales decreased 11% in the first quarter of 2011 to $457.9 million from $513.3 million in 2010. Revenues were lower primarily due to a 7% decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered and a 4% decrease in the number of home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities. New home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities, decreased to 1,903 homes in the first quarter of 2011 from 1,988 homes last year. Due to the decreased demand for new homes primarily driven by the absence of the federal tax credit in the current period, there was a decrease in home deliveries in Homebuilding Other

41


and in all of our Homebuilding segments except for our Homebuilding East segment. The increase in home deliveries in our Homebuilding East segment was primarily a result of a 39% increase in the segment’s active community count. The average sales price of homes delivered decreased to $240,000 in the first quarter of 2011, primarily in our Homebuilding West segment due to a shift to smaller square footage homes generating a lower average sales price. The average sales price of homes delivered was $258,000 in the first quarter of 2010. Sales incentives offered to homebuyers were $33,100 per home delivered in the first quarter of 2011, or 12.1% as a percentage of home sales revenue, compared to $37,100 per home delivered in the same period last year, or 12.5% as a percentage of home sales revenue.

Gross margins on home sales were $91.7 million, or 20.0%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared to $98.4 million, or 19.2%, in the first quarter of 2010. Gross margin percentage on home sales improved compared to last year, primarily due to reduced sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales. Gross profits on land sales totaled $2.5 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared to $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2010.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $5.7 million, or 7%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared to the same period last year. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2011 included $8.0 million related to the receipt of a settlement discussed below, offset by $6.6 million related to expenses associated with remedying pre-existing liabilities of a previously acquired company. As a percentage of revenues from home sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 16.4% in the first quarter of 2011, from 15.8% in the first quarter of 2010, due to lower revenues.

Lennar Homebuilding equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities was $8.7 million in the first quarter of 2011, which included our share of a gain on debt extinguishment at one of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities totaling $15.4 million, partially offset by $4.5 million of valuation adjustments related to assets of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities. In the first quarter of 2010, Lennar Homebuilding equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities was ($8.9) million.

Lennar Homebuilding other income, net, totaled $30.0 million in the first quarter of 2011, which included $29.5 million related to the receipt of a settlement. The parties to certain litigation in which we were the plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement in which they agreed we may make the following statement: “Lennar recently settled litigation against a third party in connection with Lennar’s ongoing dispute with Nicolas Marsch, III and his affiliates. As a result of the settlement, the third party paid Lennar total cash consideration of $37.5 million and that the terms are confidential.” Lennar Homebuilding other income, net, in the first quarter of 2011 also included the recognition of $10.0 million of previously deferred management fee income related to one of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities. However, Lennar Homebuilding other income, net, was reduced by $8.3 million of valuation adjustments to our investments in Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities and $4.8 million of write-offs of other assets. In the first quarter of 2010, Lennar Homebuilding other income, net, was $14.2 million.

Homebuilding interest expense was $35.8 million in the first quarter of 2011 ($13.5 million was included in cost of homes sold, $0.2 million in cost of land sold and $22.1 million in other interest expense), compared to $33.2 million in the first quarter of 2010 ($14.3 million was included in cost of homes sold, $0.2 million in cost of land sold and $18.7 million in other interest expense). Interest expense increased due to an increase in the Company’s outstanding debt compared to the same period last year.

Sales of land, Lennar Homebuilding equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities, Lennar Homebuilding other income, net and net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests may vary significantly from period to period depending on the timing of land sales and other transactions entered into by the Company and unconsolidated entities in which it has investments.

Operating earnings for the Lennar Financial Services segment were $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared to an operating loss of ($0.9) million in the first quarter of 2010. The increase in profitability was primarily due to higher profits per loan in the segment’s mortgage operations and reduced costs in the segment’s title operations.

42


In the first quarter of 2011, operating earnings for the Rialto Investments segment were $23.0 million (which included $12.0 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests), compared to an operating loss of ($1.0) million in the same period last year. In the first quarter of 2011, revenues in this segment were $33.6 million, which consisted primarily of accretable interest income associated with the segment’s portfolio of real estate loans, compared to revenues of $0.3 million in the same period last year. In the first quarter of 2011, Rialto Investments other income, net, was $13.2 million, which consisted primarily of gains from acquisition of real estate owned through foreclosure. The segment also had equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities of $4.5 million during the first quarter of 2011, consisting primarily of interest income and unrealized gains related to the Company’s investment in the AllianceBernstein L.P. (“AB”) fund formed under the Federal government’s Public-Private Investment Program (“PPIP”), compared to equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities of $0.1 million in the same period last year. In the first quarter of 2011, expenses in this segment were $28.3 million, which consisted primarily of costs related to its portfolio operations, underwriting expenses related to both completed and abandoned transactions, and other general and administrative expenses, compared to expenses of $1.4 million in the same period last year.

Corporate general and administrative expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 3%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared to the first quarter of 2010. As a percentage of total revenues, corporate general and administrative expenses increased to 4.2% in the first quarter of 2011, from 3.9% in the first quarter of 2010.

Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests were $11.3 million and ($1.0) million, respectively, in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010. Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests during the first quarter of 2011 were primarily related to the FDIC’s interest in the portfolios of real estate loans that we acquired in partnership with the FDIC.

A reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance is required if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Based upon an evaluation of all available evidence, during the three months ended February 28, 2011, we recorded a reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $8.5 million, primarily due to the net earnings generated during the period. At February 28, 2011, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $601.0 million.

Our overall effective income tax rates were (9.62%) and 63.95%, respectively, for the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010. The change in the effective tax rate, compared with the same period during 2010, resulted primarily from the reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to the net earnings generated during the three months ended February 28, 2011.

Homebuilding Segments

We have grouped our homebuilding activities into four reportable segments, which we refer to as Homebuilding East, Homebuilding Central, Homebuilding West and Homebuilding Houston, based primarily upon similar economic characteristics, geography and product type. Information about homebuilding activities in states that do not have economic characteristics that are similar to those in other states in the same geographic area is grouped under “Homebuilding Other,” which is not a reportable segment. References in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to homebuilding segments are to those reportable segments.

At February 28, 2011, our reportable homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other consisted of homebuilding divisions located in:

East: Florida, Maryland, New Jersey and Virginia

Central: Arizona, Colorado and Texas (1)

West: California and Nevada

Houston : Houston, Texas

Other: Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina and South Carolina

(1) Texas in the Central reportable segment excludes Houston, Texas, which is its own reportable segment.

43


The following tables set forth selected financial and operational information related to our homebuilding operations for the periods indicated:

Selected Financial and Operational Data

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues:

East:

Sales of homes

$ 186,309 138,693

Sales of land

2,155 3,367

Total East

188,464 142,060

Central:

Sales of homes

66,064 65,775

Sales of land

942 308

Total Central

67,006 66,083

West:

Sales of homes

96,382 162,531

Sales of land

1,786

Total West

96,382 164,317

Houston:

Sales of homes

48,664 73,827

Sales of land

4,289 1,967

Total Houston

52,953 75,794

Other:

Sales of homes

60,450 72,522

Sales of land

1,454

Total Other

61,904 72,522

Total homebuilding revenues

$ 466,709 520,776

44


Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Operating earnings (loss):

East:

Sales of homes

$ 23,525 15,483

Sales of land

220 1,234

Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(377 ) (819 )

Other income (expense), net

(5,681 ) 10,583

Other interest expense

(6,667 ) (5,958 )

Total East

11,020 20,523

Central:

Sales of homes (1)

(11,717 ) (2,342 )

Sales of land

736 (1,069 )

Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(402 ) (428 )

Other income (expense), net

121 (866 )

Other interest expense

(3,862 ) (2,542 )

Total Central

(15,124 ) (7,247 )

West:

Sales of homes (1)

4,007 735

Sales of land

13 609

Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated entities (2)

12,059 (7,488 )

Other income, net (3)

41,006 5,250

Other interest expense

(7,740 ) (6,998 )

Total West

49,345 (7,892 )

Houston:

Sales of homes

48 5,313

Sales of land

780 579

Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(10 ) (19 )

Other income, net

167 368

Other interest expense

(1,026 ) (787 )

Total Houston

(41 ) 5,454

Other:

Sales of homes

632 (1,731 )

Sales of land

702

Equity in loss from unconsolidated entities

(2,609 ) (140 )

Other expense, net

(5,653 ) (1,132 )

Other interest expense

(2,784 ) (2,380 )

Total Other

(9,712 ) (5,383 )

Total homebuilding operating earnings

$ 35,488 5,455

(1) Operating earnings on the sales of homes in Homebuilding Central for the three months ended February 28, 2011 was impacted by $6.6 million of expenses associated with remedying pre-existing liabilities of a previously acquired company. Operating earnings on the sales of homes in Homebuilding West include $8.0 million related to the receipt of a litigation settlement discussed previously in the Overview section.
(2) Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended February 28, 2011 include our $15.4 million share of a gain on debt extinguishment at one of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities.
(3) Other income, net, for the three months ended February 28, 2011 includes $29.5 million related to the receipt of a litigation settlement discussed previously in the Overview section and the recognition of $10.0 million of previously deferred management fee income related to one of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities.

45


Summary of Homebuilding Data

Deliveries:

Three Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010

East

823 609 $ 186,309 138,693 $ 226,000 228,000

Central

312 317 66,064 65,775 212,000 207,000

West

341 448 110,992 175,330 325,000 391,000

Houston

219 346 48,664 73,827 222,000 213,000

Other

228 284 60,450 72,522 265,000 255,000

Total

1,923 2,004 $ 472,479 526,147 $ 246,000 263,000

Of the total homes delivered listed above, 20 homes with a dollar value of $14.6 million and an average sales price of $731,000 represent home deliveries from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to 16 home deliveries with a dollar value of $12.8 million and an average sales price of $800,000 for the three months ended February 28, 2010.

Sales Incentives (1):

Three Months Ended
Sales Incentives
(In thousands)
Average Sales Incentives Per Home
Delivered
Sales Incentives
as a % of Revenue
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010

East

$ 26,371 23,104 $ 32,000 37,900 12.5 % 14.2 %

Central

9,728 11,119 31,200 35,100 12.9 % 14.4 %

West

9,395 16,298 29,300 37,700 8.9 % 9.1 %

Houston

8,921 13,228 40,700 38,200 15.5 % 15.2 %

Other

8,529 9,972 37,400 35,100 12.4 % 12.1 %

Total

$ 62,944 73,721 $ 33,100 37,100 12.1 % 12.5 %

(1)    Sales incentives relate to home deliveries during the period, excluding deliveries by unconsolidated entities.

New Orders (2):

Three Months Ended
Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010

East

982 970 $ 220,611 211,363 $ 225,000 218,000

Central

341 416 71,120 84,979 209,000 204,000

West

388 454 127,979 163,357 330,000 360,000

Houston

266 388 59,653 82,552 224,000 213,000

Other

290 349 82,177 86,357 283,000 247,000

Total

2,267 2,577 $ 561,540 628,608 $ 248,000 244,000

(2) New orders represent the number of new sales contracts executed with homebuyers, net of cancellations, during the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010.

Of the total new orders listed above, 21 homes with a dollar value of $16.9 million and an average sales price of $806,000 represent new orders from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to 9 new orders with a dollar value of $8.0 million and an average sales price of $894,000 for the three months ended February 28, 2010.

46


Backlog:

Homes Dollar Value (In thousands) Average Sales Price
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010
February 28,
2011
February 28,
2010

East

916 1,043 $ 225,287 251,205 $ 246,000 241,000

Central

283 266 58,348 55,141 206,000 207,000

West

226 342 74,825 132,341 331,000 387,000

Houston

292 291 69,900 69,560 239,000 239,000

Other

231 262 69,102 73,291 299,000 280,000

Total

1,948 2,204 $ 497,462 581,538 $ 255,000 264,000

Of the total homes in backlog listed above, 4 homes with a backlog dollar value of $4.5 million and an average sales price of $1,115,000 represent the backlog from unconsolidated entities at February 28, 2011, compared with backlog from unconsolidated entities of 2 homes with a backlog dollar value of $2.5 million and an average sales price of $1,238,000 at February 28, 2010.

Backlog represents the number of homes under sales contracts. Homes are sold using sales contracts, which are generally accompanied by sales deposits. In some instances, purchasers are permitted to cancel sales if they fail to qualify for financing or under certain other circumstances. The cancellation rates for the three months ended February 28, 2010 were lower than recent historical and current cancellation rates due to the temporary availability of the federal tax credit in that period. We experienced cancellation rates in our homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other as follows:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
2011 2010

East

16% 11%

Central

21% 15%

West

14% 11%

Houston

23% 14%

Other

14% 16%

Total

17% 13%

Homebuilding East: Homebuilding revenues increased for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to the three months ended February 28, 2010, primarily due to an increase in the number of home deliveries in Florida as a result of approximately a 60% increase in active community count. Gross margins on home sales were $44.6 million, or 23.9%, in 2011, compared to gross margins on home sales of $34.8 million, or 25.1%, in 2010. Although gross margin percentage on homes sales in this segment remain above average compared to the rest of our homebuilding operations, they decreased compared to last year primarily due to the close-out of a community in the prior year which had higher gross margins than the active communities in the current period. Sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales were 12.5% in 2011, compared to 14.2% in 2010.

Homebuilding Central: Homebuilding revenues remained consistent for the three months ended February 28, 2011 compared to the three months ended February 28, 2010. Gross margins on home sales were $5.8 million, or 8.7%, in 2011, compared to gross margins on home sales of $8.9 million, or 13.6%, in 2010. Gross margin percentage on homes sales decreased compared to last year primarily due to an increase in valuation adjustments. Sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales were 12.9% in 2011, compared to 14.4% in 2010.

Homebuilding West: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to the three months ended February 28, 2010, primarily due to a decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered in the segment and a decrease in the number of home deliveries in California. The decrease in the average sales price of homes delivered in the segment was due to a shift to smaller square footage homes generating a lower average sales price during the first quarter of 2011 because of a change in demand for homes in many of our communities compared to the same period last year. The decrease in the number of home deliveries in California resulted from a decreased demand for new homes primarily driven by the absence of the federal tax credit in the current period. Gross margins on home sales were $21.4 million, or 22.2%, in 2011, compared to gross margins on home sales of $30.8 million, or 19.0%, in 2010. Gross margin percentage on homes sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a combination of home deliveries from new communities with higher gross margins and the continued focus on reducing and controlling costs.

47


Homebuilding Houston: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to the three months ended February 28, 2010, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries resulting from a decreased demand for new homes primarily driven by the absence of the federal tax credit in the current period. Gross margins on home sales were $8.4 million, or 17.2%, in 2010, compared to gross margins on home sales of $14.4 million, or 19.5%, in 2009. Gross margin percentage on homes sales decreased compared to last year primarily due to reduced pricing in some lower price point communities to move inventory.

Homebuilding Other: Homebuilding revenues decreased for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to the three months ended February 28, 2010, primarily due to a decrease in the number of home deliveries in Minnesota, North and South Carolina, partially offset by an increase in deliveries in Georgia due to the creation of a new division last year. The decrease in deliveries in Minnesota, North and South Carolina was due to a decreased demand for new homes primarily driven by the absence of the federal tax credit in the current period. Gross margins on home sales were $11.6 million, or 19.1%, in 2011, compared to gross margins on home sales of $9.4 million, or 12.9%, in 2010. Gross margin percentage on homes sales improved compared to last year primarily due to a reduction of valuation adjustments. Sales incentives offered to homebuyers as a percentage of revenues from home sales were 12.4% in 2011, compared to 12.1% in 2010.

At February 28, 2011 and 2010, we owned 91,007 homesites and 82,605 homesites, respectively, and had access to an additional 17,432 homesites and 21,569 homesites, respectively, through either option contracts with third parties or agreements with unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At November 30, 2010, we owned 84,482 homesites and had access to an additional 19,974 homesites through either option contracts with third parties or agreements with unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At February 28, 2011, 2% of the homesites we owned were subject to home purchase contracts. At February 28, 2011 and 2010, our backlog of sales contracts was 1,948 homes ($497.5 million) and 2,204 homes ($581.5 million), respectively. The decrease in backlog was primarily attributable to a decrease in new orders in the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to the three months ended February 28, 2010.

Lennar Financial Services Segment

The following table presents selected financial data related to our Lennar Financial Services segment for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(Dollars in thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues

$ 57,713 53,365

Costs and expenses

56,530 54,266

Operating earnings (loss)

$ 1,183 (901 )

Dollar value of mortgages originated

$ 557,000 551,000

Number of mortgages originated

2,700 2,500

Mortgage capture rate of Lennar homebuyers

77 % 85 %

Number of title and closings service transactions

22,800 23,300

Number of title policies issued

32,600 24,800

48


Rialto Investments Segment

Rialto’s objective is to generate superior, risk-adjusted returns by focusing on commercial and residential real estate opportunities arising from dislocations in the United States real estate markets and the eventual restructure and recapitalization of those markets. Rialto believes it will be able to deliver these returns through its abilities to source, underwrite, price, manage and ultimately monetize real estate assets, as well as providing similar services to others in markets across the country.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Rialto segment for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues

$ 33,623 301

Costs and expenses

28,349 1,403

Rialto Investments equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities

4,525 143

Rialto Investments other income, net

13,203

Operating earnings (loss) (1)

$ 23,002 (959 )

(1) Operating earnings for the three months ended February 28, 2011 include $12.0 million of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Distressed Asset Portfolios

In February 2010, the Rialto segment acquired indirectly 40% managing member equity interests in two limited liability companies (“LLCs”), in partnership with the FDIC. The LLCs hold performing and non-performing loans formerly owned by 22 failed financial institutions and when the Rialto segment acquired its interests in the LLCs, the two portfolios consisted of approximately 5,500 distressed residential and commercial real estate loans. The FDIC retained 60% equity interests in the LLCs and provided $626.9 million of financing with 0% interest, which is non-recourse to us and the LLCs. As of February 28, 2011, the notes payable balance was $626.9 million; however, $125.6 million of cash collections on loans in excess of expenses has been deposited in a defeasance account, established for the repayment of the notes payable, under the agreement with the FDIC. The funds in the defeasance account will be used to retire the notes payable upon their maturity.

The LLCs met the accounting definition of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and since we were determined to be the primary beneficiary, we consolidated the LLCs. At February 28, 2011, these consolidated LLCs had total combined assets and liabilities of $1.4 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively.

In September 2010, the Rialto segment acquired approximately 400 distressed residential and commercial real estate loans and over 300 real estate owned (“REO”) properties from three financial institutions. We paid $310 million for the distressed real estate and real estate related assets of which, $125 million was financed through a 5-year senior unsecured note provided by one of the selling institutions.

Investments

An affiliate in the Rialto segment is a sub-advisor to the AB PPIP fund and receives management fees for sub-advisory services. We also made a commitment of $75 million in the AB PPIP fund of which the remaining outstanding commitment as of February 28, 2011 was $11.2 million. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the carrying value of our investment in the AB PPIP fund was $80.4 million and $77.3 million, respectively.

In November 2010, the Rialto segment completed its first closing of a real estate investment fund (the “Fund”) with initial equity commitments of approximately $300 million (including $75 million committed by the Company). During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Company contributed $10.6 million to the Fund. In addition, during the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Fund invested $41.5 million

49


for the acquisition of two distressed real estate asset portfolios. The combined portfolios include approximately 80 real estate loans with a total aggregate unpaid principal balance of approximately $125 million. As of February 28, 2011, the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the Fund was $10.6 million.

Additionally, another subsidiary in the Rialto segment also has approximately a 5% investment in a service and infrastructure provider to the residential home loan market (the “Servicer Provider”), which provides services to the consolidated LLCs. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the carrying value of our investment in the Servicer Provider was $9.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively.

(2) Financial Condition and Capital Resources

At February 28, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents related to our homebuilding, financial services and Rialto operations of $1,206.6 million, compared to $913.2 million at February 28, 2010.

We finance our land acquisition and development activities, construction activities, financial services activities, Rialto activities and general operating needs primarily with cash generated from our operations, debt issuances and equity offerings, as well as cash borrowed under our warehouse lines of credit.

Operating Cash Flow Activities

During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, cash provided by operating activities amounted to $9.7 million and $89.4 million, respectively. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, cash provided by operating activities were positively impacted by our net earnings, a decrease in Financial Services loans held-for-sale and a decrease in receivables. This was partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities and an increase in inventories due to strategic land purchases. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities from the three months ended February 28, 2010 to the three months ended February 28, 2011 is primarily due to the $93.8 million tax refund received in the first quarter of 2010, which positively impacted cash provided by operating activities during that period.

Investing Cash Flow Activities

During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, cash used in investing activities totaled $2.1 million and $424.1 million, respectively. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, we received $50.0 million of principal payments on Rialto Investments loans receivable, $7.6 million of distributions of capital from Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities and $7.8 million of proceeds from the sale of REO. This was partially offset by $25.2 million of cash contributions to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities primarily for working capital, $10.6 million of cash contributions to the Fund, which is a Rialto Investments unconsolidated entity, and a $24.3 million increase in Rialto Investments defeasance cash.

During the three months ended February 28, 2010, our Rialto segment contributed $265.1 million of cash (including a $22 million working capital reserve) to acquire indirectly 40% managing member interests in two LLCs in partnership with the FDIC. Upon the consolidation of the LLCs that hold the two portfolios of real estate loans acquired in the FDIC transaction, the Company consolidated $54.0 million of cash, resulting in net contributions to consolidated entities by the Rialto segment of $211.1 million during the three months ended February 28, 2010. The Rialto segment also contributed $41.3 million of cash to unconsolidated entities (the AB PPIP fund).

We are always evaluating the possibility of acquiring homebuilders and other companies. However, at February 28, 2011, we had no agreements or understandings regarding any significant transactions.

Financing Cash Flow Activities

During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, our cash used in financing activities was primarily attributed to principal payments on other borrowings, partial redemption of senior notes in the prior year and net repayments under our Lennar Financial Services’ warehouse repurchase facilities.

50


Debt to total capital ratios are financial measures commonly used in the homebuilding industry and are presented to assist in understanding the leverage of our Lennar Homebuilding operations. Management believes providing a measure of leverage of our Lennar Homebuilding operations enables management and readers of our financial statements to better understand our financial position and performance. Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital and net Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital are calculated as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010
February 28,
2010

Lennar Homebuilding debt

$ 3,129,065 3,128,154 2,682,928

Stockholders’ equity

2,640,377 2,608,949 2,435,191

Total capital

$ 5,769,442 5,737,103 5,118,119

Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital

54.2 % 54.5 % 52.4 %

Lennar Homebuilding debt

$ 3,129,065 3,128,154 2,682,928

Less: Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents

1,014,000 1,207,247 732,386

Net Lennar Homebuilding debt

$ 2,115,065 1,920,907 1,950,542

Net Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital (1)

44.5 % 42.4 % 44.5 %

(1) Net Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital consists of net Lennar Homebuilding debt (Lennar Homebuilding debt less Lennar Homebuilding cash and cash equivalents) divided by total capital (net Lennar Homebuilding debt plus stockholders’ equity).

At February 28, 2011, Lennar Homebuilding debt to total capital was higher compared to February 28, 2010, due to the increase in Lennar Homebuilding debt as a result of an increase in senior notes, partially offset by an increase in stockholder’s equity primarily related to our net earnings.

Our Lennar Homebuilding average debt outstanding was $3.1 billion for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to $2.7 billion for the three months ended February 28, 2010. The average rate for interest incurred was 5.7% for the three months ended February 28, 2011, compared to 6.3% for the three months ended February 28, 2010. Interest incurred related to homebuilding debt for the three months ended February 28, 2011 was $49.9 million, compared to $45.9 million in the same period last year. The majority of our short-term financing needs, including financings for land acquisition and development activities and general operating needs, are met with cash generated from operations and proceeds of debt issuances.

We have a $150 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement (“LC Agreement”) with certain financial institutions. The LC Agreement may be increased to $200 million, although there are currently no commitments for the additional $50 million. We believe we were in compliance with our debt covenants at February 28, 2011.

Our performance letters of credit outstanding were $74.8 million and $78.9 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Our financial letters of credit outstanding were $201.9 million and $195.0 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Performance letters of credit are generally posted with regulatory bodies to guarantee our performance of certain development and construction activities, and financial letters of credit are generally posted in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts, for insurance risks, credit enhancements and as other collateral.

At February 28, 2011, our Lennar Financial Services segment has a warehouse repurchase facility with a maximum aggregate commitment of $150 million and an additional uncommitted amount of $50 million that matures in February 2012, and another warehouse repurchase facility with a maximum aggregate commitment of $175 million that matures in July 2011. The maximum aggregate commitment under these facilities totaled $325 million as of February 28, 2011.

51


Our Lennar Financial Services segment uses these facilities to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold to investors and expects the facilities to be renewed or replaced with other facilities when they mature. Borrowings under the facilities were $122.3 million and $271.6 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, and were collateralized by mortgage loans and receivables on loans sold to investors but not yet paid for with outstanding principal balances of $128.8 million and $286.0 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010.

Since our Lennar Financial Services segment’s borrowings under the warehouse repurchase facilities are generally repaid with the proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans and receivables on loans that secure those borrowings, the facilities are not likely to be a call on our current cash or future cash resources. If the facilities are not renewed, the borrowings under the lines of credit will be paid off by selling mortgage loans held-for-sale and by collecting on receivables on loans sold to investors but not yet paid. Without the facilities, our Lennar Financial Services segment would have to use cash from operations and other funding sources to finance its lending activities.

Changes in Capital Structure

We have a stock repurchase program which permits the purchase of up to 20 million shares of our outstanding common stock. During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, there were no repurchases of common stock under the stock repurchase program. As of February 28, 2011, 6.2 million shares of common stock can be repurchased in the future under the program.

During the three months ended February 28, 2011, treasury stock increased by an immaterial amount of common shares.

On February 8, 2011, we paid cash dividends of $0.04 per share for both our Class A and Class B common stock to holders of record at the close of business on January 25, 2011, as declared by our Board of Directors on January 12, 2011.

Based on our current financial condition and credit relationships, we believe that our operations and borrowing resources will provide for our current and long-term capital requirements at our anticipated levels of activity.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Lennar Homebuilding: Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

At February 28, 2011, we had equity investments in 38 unconsolidated entities (of which 14 had recourse debt, 9 non-recourse debt and 15 had no debt), compared to 42 unconsolidated entities at November 30, 2010. Historically, we invested in unconsolidated entities that acquire and develop land (1) for our homebuilding operations or for sale to third parties or (2) for the construction of homes for sale to third-party homebuyers. Through these entities, we primarily sought to reduce and share our risk by limiting the amount of our capital invested in land, while obtaining access to potential future homesites and allowing us to participate in strategic ventures. The use of these entities also, in some instances, enabled us to acquire land to which we could not otherwise obtain access, or could not obtain access on as favorable terms, without the participation of a strategic partner. Participants in these joint ventures are land owners/developers, other homebuilders and financial or strategic partners. Joint ventures with land owners/developers have given us access to homesites owned or controlled by our partner. Joint ventures with other homebuilders have provided us with the ability to bid jointly with our partner for large land parcels. Joint ventures with financial partners have allowed us to combine our homebuilding expertise with access to our partners’ capital. Joint ventures with strategic partners have allowed us to combine our homebuilding expertise with the specific expertise (e.g., commercial or infill experience) of our partner. Each joint venture is governed by an executive committee consisting of members from the partners.

52


Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method was as follows:

Statements of Operations and Selected Information

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(Dollars in thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues

$ 67,063 56,755

Costs and expenses

88,580 79,180

Other income

123,007

Net earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities

$ 101,490 (22,425 )

Our share of net earnings (loss)

$ 23,000 (8,156 )

Our share of net earnings (loss) – recognized (1)

$ 8,661 (8,894 )

Our cumulative share of net earnings – deferred at February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively

$ 8,419 11,064

Our investments in unconsolidated entities

$ 642,874 599,649

Equity of the unconsolidated entities

$ 2,259,782 2,230,553

Our investment % in the unconsolidated entities

28 % 27 %

(1) For the three months ended February 28, 2011, our share of net earnings recognized includes a $15.4 million gain related to our share of a $123.0 million gain on debt extinguishment at a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity, partially offset by $4.5 million of valuation adjustments related to assets of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities.

Balance Sheets

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 75,768 82,573

Inventories

3,286,866 3,371,435

Other assets

315,280 307,244
$ 3,677,914 3,761,252

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$ 275,652 327,824

Debt

1,142,480 1,284,818

Equity

2,259,782 2,148,610
$ 3,677,914 3,761,252

In fiscal 2007, we sold a portfolio of land to a strategic land investment venture with Morgan Stanley Estate Fund II, L.P., an affiliate of Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., in which we have a 20% ownership interest and 50% voting rights. Due to our continuing involvement, the transaction did not qualify as a sale by us under GAAP; thus, the inventory has remained on our condensed consolidated balance sheets in consolidated inventory not owned. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the portfolio of land (including land development costs) of $407.0 million and $424.5 million, respectively, is also reflected as inventory in the summarized condensed financial information related to Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

Debt to total capital of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which we have investments was calculated as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Debt

$ 1,142,480 1,284,818

Equity

2,259,782 2,148,610

Total capital

$ 3,402,262 3,433,428

Debt to total capital of our unconsolidated entities

33.6 % 37.4 %

53


Our investments in Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities by type of venture were as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Land development

$ 553,666 530,004

Homebuilding

89,208 96,181

Total investments

$ 642,874 626,185

The summary of our net recourse exposure related to the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which we have investments was as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Several recourse debt – repayment

$ 70,432 33,399

Several recourse debt – maintenance

16,399 29,454

Joint and several recourse debt – repayment

48,365 48,406

Joint and several recourse debt – maintenance

43,466 61,591

Lennar’s maximum recourse exposure

178,662 172,850

Less: joint and several reimbursement agreements with our partners

(57,167 ) (58,878 )

Lennar’s net recourse exposure

$ 121,495 113,972

During the three months ended February 28, 2011, our maximum recourse exposure related to indebtedness of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities increased by $5.8 million, which includes $36.3 million increase for consideration given in the form of a several guarantee in connection with the favorable debt maturity extension and principal reduction at Heritage Fields El Toro, one of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities as discussed in the following table. This increase was partially offset by reductions in our maximum recourse exposure with regard to other unconsolidated entities, of which $2.3 million was paid by us primarily through capital contributions to unconsolidated entities and $28.2 million related to the consolidation of a joint venture, the restructuring of a guarantee and the joint ventures selling inventory.

As of February 28, 2011, we had $6.9 million of obligation guarantees accrued as a liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, compared to $10.2 million as of November 30, 2010. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the liability was reduced by $2.6 million related to a change in estimate of a previously accrued obligation guarantee and by a $0.7 million cash payment related to another obligation guarantee previously recorded. The obligation guarantees are estimated based on current facts and circumstances and any unexpected changes may lead us to incur additional obligation guarantees in the future.

Indebtedness of an unconsolidated entity is secured by its own assets. Some unconsolidated entities own multiple properties and other assets. There is no cross collateralization of debt to different unconsolidated entities. We also do not use our investment in one unconsolidated entity as collateral for the debt in another unconsolidated entity or commingle funds among our unconsolidated entities.

In connection with a loan to an unconsolidated entity, we and our partners often guarantee to a lender either jointly and severally or on a several basis, any, or all of the following: (i) the completion of the development, in whole or in part, (ii) indemnification of the lender from environmental issues, (iii) indemnification of the lender from “bad boy acts” of the unconsolidated entity (or full recourse liability in the event of unauthorized transfer or bankruptcy) and (iv) that the loan to value and/or loan to cost will not exceed a certain percentage (maintenance or remargining guarantee) or that a percentage of the outstanding loan will be repaid (repayment guarantee).

In connection with loans to an unconsolidated entity where there is a joint and several guarantee, we generally have a reimbursement agreement with our partner. The reimbursement agreement provides that neither party is responsible for more than its proportionate share of the guarantee. However, if our joint

54


venture partner does not have adequate financial resources to meet its obligations under the reimbursement agreement, we may be liable for more than our proportionate share, up to our maximum exposure, which is the full amount covered by the joint and several guarantee.

The recourse debt exposure in the previous table represents our maximum exposure to loss from guarantees and does not take into account the underlying value of the collateral or the other assets of the borrowers that are available to repay the debt or to reimburse us for any payments on our guarantees. Our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities that have recourse debt have a significant amount of assets and equity. The summarized balance sheets of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities with recourse debt were as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets (1)

$ 2,269,922 990,028

Liabilities (1)

954,906 487,606

Equity (1)

1,315,016 502,422

(1) In the three months ended February 28, 2011, Heritage Fields El Toro, one of Lennar Homebuilding’s unconsolidated entities, extended the maturity of its $573.5 million debt without recourse to Lennar until 2018. In exchange for the extension and partial debt extinguishment, which reduced the outstanding debt balance to $481.0 million as of February 28, 2011, all the partners agreed to provide a limited several repayment guarantee on the outstanding debt, which resulted in a $36.3 million increase to our maximum recourse exposure and a subsequent increase to assets, liabilities and equity of Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities that have recourse debt. In addition, we recognized a $15.4 million gain for our share of the $123.0 million gain on debt extinguishment.

In addition, in most instances in which we have guaranteed debt of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity, our partners have also guaranteed that debt and are required to contribute their share of the guarantee payment. Some of our guarantees are repayment guarantees and some are maintenance guarantees. In a repayment guarantee, we and our venture partners guarantee repayment of a portion or all of the debt in the event of a default before the lender would have to exercise its rights against the collateral. In the event of default, if our venture partner does not have adequate financial resources to meet its obligation under our reimbursement agreement, we may be liable for more than our proportionate share, up to our maximum recourse exposure, which is the full amount covered by the joint and several guarantee. The maintenance guarantees only apply if the value of the collateral (generally land and improvements) is less than a specified percentage of the loan balance. If we are required to make a payment under a maintenance guarantee to bring the value of the collateral above the specified percentage of the loan balance, the payment would generally constitute a capital contribution or loan to the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity and increase our share of any funds the unconsolidated entity distributes.

In connection with many of the loans to Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities, we and our joint venture partners (or entities related to them) have been required to give guarantees of completion to the lenders. Those completion guarantees may require that the guarantors complete the construction of the improvements for which the financing was obtained. If the construction is to be done in phases, the guarantee generally is limited to completing only the phases as to which construction has already commenced and for which loan proceeds were used.

During the three months ended February 28, 2011, there were: (1) payments of $1.7 million under our maintenance guarantees and (2) other loan paydowns of $0.6 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under our repayment guarantees. During the three months ended February 28, 2010, there were: (1) no payments under maintenance guarantees and (2) other loan paydowns of $5.9 million, a portion of which related to amounts paid under our repayment guarantees. During the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, there were no payments under completion guarantees.

55


As of February 28, 2011, the fair values of the maintenance guarantees, completion guarantees and repayment guarantees were not material. We believe that as of February 28, 2011, in the event we become legally obligated to perform under a guarantee of the obligation of a Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entity due to a triggering event under a guarantee, most of the time the collateral should be sufficient to repay at least a significant portion of the obligation or we and our partners would contribute additional capital into the venture.

The total debt of Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities in which we have investments was as follows:

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Lennar’s net recourse exposure

$ 121,495 113,972

Reimbursement agreements from partners

57,167 58,878

Lennar’s maximum recourse exposure

$ 178,662 172,850

Non-recourse bank debt and other debt (partner’s share of several recourse)

$ 176,229 79,921

Non-recourse land seller debt and other debt

60,620 58,604

Non-recourse debt with completion guarantees

505,069 600,297

Non-recourse debt without completion guarantees

221,900 373,146

Non-recourse debt to Lennar

963,818 1,111,968

Total debt

$ 1,142,480 1,284,818

Lennar’s maximum recourse exposure as a % of total JV debt

16 % 13 %

In view of current credit market conditions, it is not uncommon for lenders to real estate developers, including joint ventures in which we have interests, to assert non-monetary defaults (such as failure to meet construction completion deadlines or declines in the market value of collateral below required amounts) or technical monetary defaults against the real estate developers. In most instances, those asserted defaults are resolved by modifications of the loan terms, additional equity investments or other concessions by the borrowers. In addition, in some instances, real estate developers, including joint ventures in which we have interests, are forced to request temporary waivers of covenants in loan documents or modifications of loan terms, which are often, but not always obtained. However, in some instances developers, including joint ventures in which we have interests, are not able to meet their monetary obligations to lenders, and are thus declared in default. Because we sometimes guarantee all or portions of the obligations to lenders of joint ventures in which we have interests, when these joint ventures default on their obligations, lenders may or may not have claims against us. Normally, we do not make payments with regard to guarantees of joint venture obligations while the joint ventures are contesting assertions regarding sums due to their lenders. When it is determined that a joint venture is obligated to make a payment that we have guaranteed and the joint venture will not be able to make that payment, we accrue the amounts probable to be paid by us as a liability. Although we generally fulfill our guarantee obligations within a reasonable time after we determine that we are obligated with regard to them, at any point in time it is likely that we will have some balance of unpaid guarantee liability. At February 28, 2011, the liability for unpaid guarantees of joint venture indebtedness on our consolidated balance sheet totaled $6.9 million.

56


The following table summarizes the principal maturities of our Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated entities (“JVs”) debt as per current debt arrangements as of February 28, 2011 and does not represent estimates of future cash payments that will be made to reduce debt balances. Many JV loans have extension options in the loan agreements that would allow the loans to be extended into future years.

Principal Maturities of Unconsolidated JVs by Period
(In thousands) Total JV
Assets (1)
Total JV
Debt
2011 2012 2013 Thereafter Other
Debt (2)

Net recourse debt to Lennar

$ 121,495 38,893 23,230 13,547 45,825

Reimbursement agreements

57,167 21,733 8,434 27,000

Maximum recourse debt exposure to Lennar

$ 2,269,922 178,662 38,893 44,963 21,981 72,825

Debt without recourse to Lennar

1,120,607 963,818 207,368 58,074 44,493 591,342 62,541

Total

$ 3,390,529 1,142,480 246,261 103,037 66,474 664,167 62,541

(1) Excludes unconsolidated joint venture assets where the joint venture has no debt.
(2) Represents land seller debt and other debt.

The following table is a breakdown of the assets, debt and equity of the Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated joint ventures by partner type as of February 28, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands) Total JV
Assets
Maximum
Recourse
Debt
Exposure
to Lennar
Reimbursement
Agreements
Net
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
Total Debt
Without
Recourse
to Lennar
Total JV
Debt
Total JV
Equity
JV Debt
to Total
Capital
Ratio
Remaining
Homes/
Homesites
in JV

Partner Type:

Financial

$ 2,459,549 66,250 27,000 39,250 669,106 735,356 1,465,732 33 % 41,823

Land Owners/Developers

480,496 35,763 35,763 117,773 153,536 272,394 36 % 17,111

Strategic

383,755 55,051 21,733 33,318 31,111 86,162 286,836 23 % 6,702

Other Builders

354,114 21,598 8,434 13,164 83,287 104,885 234,820 31 % 6,087

Total

$ 3,677,914 178,662 57,167 121,495 901,277 1,079,939 2,259,782 32 % 71,723

Land seller debt and other debt

$ 62,541 62,541

Total JV debt

$ 178,662 57,167 121,495 963,818 1,142,480

57


The table below indicates the assets, debt and equity of our 10 largest Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated joint venture investments as of February 28, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands) Lennar’s
Investment
Total JV
Assets
Maximum
Recourse
Debt
Exposure
to Lennar
Reimbursement
Agreements
Net
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
Total Debt
Without
Recourse to
Lennar
Total JV
Debt
Total JV
Equity
JV Debt
to Total
Capital
Ratio

Top Ten JVs (1) :

Heritage Fields El Toro

$ 124,909 1,323,850 36,250 36,250 444,751 481,001 823,029 37 %

Platinum Triangle Partners

108,861 269,773 43,466 21,733 21,733 43,466 216,165 17 %

Central Park West Holdings

63,531 190,600 30,000 27,000 3,000 112,873 142,873 46,204 76 %

Newhall Land Development

45,313 448,995 261,373

Runkle Canyon

37,068 75,567 74,137

Ballpark Village

36,430 125,754 52,910 52,910 72,419 42 %

LS College Park

34,958 68,664 68,412

MS Rialto Residential Holdings

29,240 415,093 94,646 94,646 307,323 24 %

Treasure Island
Community Development

22,547 46,422 45,125

Rocking Horse Partners

18,677 46,786 8,308 8,308 37,342 18 %

10 largest JV investments

521,534 3,011,504 109,716 48,733 60,983 713,488 823,204 1,951,529 30 %

Other JVs

121,340 666,410 68,946 8,434 60,512 187,789 256,735 308,253 45 %

Total

$ 642,874 3,677,914 178,662 57,167 121,495 901,277 1,079,939 2,259,782 32 %

Land seller debt and other debt

$ 62,541 62,541

Total JV debt

$ 178,662 57,167 121,495 963,818 1,142,480

(1) All of the joint ventures presented in the table above operate in our Homebuilding West segment except for Rocking Horse Partners, which operates in our Homebuilding Central segment, and MS Rialto Residential Holdings, which operates in all of our homebuilding segments and Homebuilding Other.

The table below indicates the percentage of assets, debt and equity of our 10 largest Lennar Homebuilding unconsolidated joint venture investments, as of February 28, 2011:

% of
Total JV
Assets
% of Maximum
Recourse Debt
Exposure to
Lennar
% of Net
Recourse
Debt to
Lennar
% of Total
Debt Without
Recourse to
Lennar
% of
Total JV
Equity

10 largest JVs

82 % 61 % 50 % 79 % 86 %

Other

18 % 39 % 50 % 21 % 14 %

Total

100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Rialto Investments: Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

An affiliate in the Rialto segment is a sub-advisor to the AB PPIP fund and receives management fees for sub-advisory services. As of February 28, 2011, 85% of committed capital has been called including $63.8 million of the $75 million we committed to invest. As of February 28, 2011, the AB PPIP fund has invested approximately $4.1 billion to purchase $6.5 billion in face amount of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities and this investment is included in the investment securities reflected in the summarized condensed balance sheets of Rialto’s unconsolidated entities. The gross yield of the fund since its inception has totaled approximately 51%. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the carrying value of our investment in the AB PPIP fund was $80.4 million and $77.3 million, respectively.

During 2010, we committed to invest $75 million in the Rialto segment’s Fund. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, we contributed $10.6 million to the Fund. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the Fund invested $41.5 million for the acquisition of two distressed real estate asset portfolios. The combined portfolios include approximately 80 real estate loans with a total aggregate unpaid principal balance of approximately $125 million. As of February 28, 2011, the carrying value of our investment in the Fund was $10.6 million.

58


Additionally, another subsidiary in the Rialto segment also has approximately a 5% investment in the Servicer Provider, which provides services to the consolidated LLCs. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, the carrying value of our investment in the Servicer Provider was $9.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively.

Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis related to Rialto’s investment in unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method was as follows:

Balance Sheets

(In thousands) February 28,
2011
November 30,
2010

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$      56,537 42,793

Investment securities

4,617,758 4,341,226

Other assets

171,838 181,600
$4,846,133 4,565,619

Liabilities and equity:

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$250,231 110,921

Partner loans

137,820 137,820

Debt

1,955,000 1,955,000

Equity

2,503,082 2,361,878
$4,846,133 4,565,619

Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended
February 28,
(In thousands) 2011 2010

Revenues

$ 116,888 84,187

Costs and expenses

51,471 89,450

Other income, net

86,788

Net earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities

$ 152,205 (5,263 )

Rialto Investments’ share of net earnings recognized

$ 4,525 143

59


Option Contracts

We have access to land through option contracts, which generally enables us to control portions of properties owned by third parties (including land funds) and unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise the option.

The table below indicates the number of homesites owned and homesites to which we had access through option contracts with third parties (“optioned”) or unconsolidated joint ventures (“JVs”) (i.e., controlled homesites) at February 28, 2011 and 2010:

Controlled Homesites

February 28, 2011

Optioned JVs Total Owned
Homesites
Total
Homesites

East

4,126 1,578 5,704 26,786 32,490

Central

1,072 1,589 2,661 16,179 18,840

West

258 6,454 6,712 28,521 35,233

Houston

1,117 298 1,415 10,409 11,824

Other

866 74 940 9,112 10,052

Total homesites

7,439 9,993 17,432 91,007 108,439
Controlled Homesites

February 28, 2010

Optioned JVs Total Owned
Homesites
Total
Homesites

East

5,230 1,776 7,006 28,361 35,367

Central

1,307 2,610 3,917 15,363 19,280

West

20 7,236 7,256 25,083 32,339

Houston

798 2,067 2,865 6,636 9,501

Other

451 74 525 7,162 7,687

Total homesites

7,806 13,763 21,569 82,605 104,174

We evaluate all option contracts for land to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, we are required to consolidate the land under option at the purchase price of the optioned land. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, the effect of consolidation of these option contracts was a net increase of $5.3 million to consolidated inventory not owned with a corresponding increase to liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2011. To reflect the purchase price of the inventory consolidated, we reclassified the related option deposits from land under development to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2011. The liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned primarily represent the difference between the option exercise prices for the optioned land and our cash deposits. The increase to consolidated inventory not owned was offset by our exercise of options to acquire land under certain contracts previously consolidated, resulting in a net decrease in consolidated inventory not owned of $18.2 million for the three months ended February 28, 2011.

Our exposure to loss related to our option contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities consisted of our non-refundable option deposits and pre-acquisitions costs totaling $154.7 million and $157.4 million, respectively, at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Additionally, we had posted $48.8 million and $48.9 million, respectively, of letters of credit in lieu of cash deposits under certain option contracts as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010.

60


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments have not changed materially from those reported in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010.

We are subject to the usual obligations associated with entering into contracts (including option contracts) for the purchase, development and sale of real estate in the routine conduct of our business. Option contracts for the purchase of land generally enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties and unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise our option. This reduces our financial risk associated with land holdings. At February 28, 2011, we had access to 17,432 homesites through option contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At February 28, 2011, we had $154.7 million of non-refundable option deposits and pre-acquisition costs related to certain of these homesites and $48.8 million of letters of credit posted in lieu of cash deposits under certain option contracts.

At February 28, 2011, we had letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $276.7 million (which included the $48.8 million of letters of credit discussed above). These letters of credit are generally posted either with regulatory bodies to guarantee our performance of certain development and construction activities, or in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts, for insurance risks, credit enhancements and as other collateral. Additionally, at February 28, 2011, we had outstanding performance and surety bonds related to site improvements at various projects (including certain projects in our joint ventures) of $710.0 million. Although significant development and construction activities have been completed related to these site improvements, these bonds are generally not released until all of the development and construction activities are completed. As of February 28, 2011, there were approximately $331.4 million, or 47%, of costs to complete related to these site improvements. We do not presently anticipate any draws upon these bonds, but if any such draws occur, we do not believe they would have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Our Lennar Financial Services segment had a pipeline of loan applications in process of $491.5 million at February 28, 2011. Loans in process for which interest rates were committed to the borrowers and builder commitments for loan programs totaled approximately $165.0 million as of February 28, 2011. Substantially all of these commitments were for periods of 60 days or less. Since a portion of these commitments is expected to expire without being exercised by the borrowers or because borrowers may not meet certain criteria at the time of closing, the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Our Lennar Financial Services segment uses mandatory mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) forward commitments, option contracts and investor commitments to hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk associated with MBS forward commitments, option contracts and loan sales transactions is managed by limiting our counterparties to investment banks, federally regulated bank affiliates and other investors meeting our credit standards. Our risk, in the event of default by the purchaser, is the difference between the contract price and fair value of the MBS forward commitments and option contracts. At February 28, 2011, we had open commitments amounting to $217.0 million to sell MBS with varying settlement dates through May 2011.

(3) New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 16 of our condensed consolidated financial statements included under Item 1 of this Report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to our Company.

61


(4) Critical Accounting Policies

We believe that there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during the three months ended February 28, 2011, as compared to those we disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010. Even though our critical accounting policies have not changed in any significant way during the three months ended February 28, 2011, the following provides additional disclosures about our process to estimate the fair value for the real estate owned (“REO”) acquired through foreclosure of a loan receivable.

Real Estate Owned

REO represents real estate that our Rialto segment has taken control or has effective control of in partial or full satisfaction of loans receivable. At the time of acquisition through foreclosure of a loan, REO is recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell if classified as held-for-sale and at fair value if classified as held-and-used, which becomes the property’s new basis. The fair values of these assets are determined in part by placing reliance on third party appraisals of the properties and/or internally prepared analysis of recent offers or prices on comparable properties in the proximate vicinity. The third party appraisals and internally developed analysis are significantly impacted by the local market economy, market supply and demand, competitive conditions and prices on comparable properties, adjusted for date of sale, location, property size and other factors. Each REO is unique and is analyzed in the context of the particular market where the property is located. In order to establish the significant assumptions for a particular REO, we analyze historical trends, including trends achieved by our local homebuilding operations, if applicable, and current trends in the market and economy impacting the REO. Using available trend information, we then calculate our best estimate of fair value, which can include projected cash flows discounted at a rate we believe a market participant would determine to be commensurate with the inherent risks associated with the assets and related estimated cash flow streams.

Changes in economic factors, consumer demand and market conditions, among other things, could materially impact estimates used in the third party appraisals and/or internally prepared analysis of recent offers or prices on comparable properties. Thus, estimates can differ significantly from the amounts ultimately realized by our Rialto segment from disposition of these assets. The amount by which the recorded investment in the loan is less than the REO’s fair value (net of estimated cost to sell if held-for-sale), is recorded as a gain on foreclosure within Rialto Investments’ other income, net, in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. The amount by which the recorded investment in the loan is greater than the REO’s fair value (net of estimated cost to sell if held-for-sale) is initially recorded as a loan impairment within Rialto Investments’ costs and expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations and upon foreclosure the amount of the impairment is charged off against the related reserve.

Additionally, REO includes real estate which Rialto has purchased directly from financial institutions. These REOs are recorded at cost or allocated cost if purchased in a bulk transaction.

Subsequent to obtaining REO via foreclosure or directly from a financial institution, management periodically performs valuations using the methodologies described above such that the real estate is carried at the lower of its new cost basis or fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. Any subsequent valuation adjustments, operating expenses or income, and gains and losses on disposition of such properties are also recognized in Rialto Investments other income, net.

We believe that the accounting for REO is a critical accounting policy because of the significant judgment required in the third party appraisals and/or internally prepared analysis of recent offers or prices on comparable properties in the proximate vicinity used to estimate the fair value of the REOs.

62


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our investments, debt obligations, loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment. We utilize forward commitments and option contracts to mitigate the risks associated with our mortgage loan portfolio.

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010 contains information about market risk under “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” There has been no material changes in our exposure to market risks during the three months ended February 28, 2011.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer participated in an evaluation by our management of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our fiscal quarter that ended on February 28, 2011. Based on their participation in that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 28, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or furnished under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Our CEO and CFO also participated in an evaluation by our management of any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended February 28, 2011. That evaluation did not identify any changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1 - 5. Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

31.1. Rule 13a-14(a) certification by Stuart A. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer.

31.2. Rule 13a-14(a) certification by Bruce E. Gross, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

32. Section 1350 certifications by Stuart A. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Bruce E. Gross, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

63


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Lennar Corporation
(Registrant)
Date: April 11, 2011

/s/ Bruce E. Gross

Bruce E. Gross

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 11, 2011

/s/ David M. Collins

David M. Collins
Controller

64


Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.

Description

31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) certification by Stuart A. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer.
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) certification by Bruce E. Gross, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
32 Section 1350 certifications by Stuart A. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Bruce E. Gross, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

65

TABLE OF CONTENTS