LEVI STRAUSS & CO
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
_____________________________
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
or
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
November 24, 2013
Commission file number: 002-90139
_____________________________
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
DELAWARE
|
|
94-0905160
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1155 Battery Street, San Francisco, California 94111
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(415) 501-6000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
_____________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
_____________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
¨
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “Large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer
¨
|
|
Accelerated filer
¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company
¨
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
¨
No
þ
The Company is privately held. Nearly all of its common equity is owned by descendants of the family of the Company’s founder, Levi Strauss, and their relatives. There is no trading in the common equity and therefore an aggregate market value based on sales or bid and asked prices is not determinable.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock $.01 par value —
37,446,988
shares outstanding on
February 6, 2014
Documents incorporated by reference: None
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED
NOVEMBER 24, 2013
|
|
|
Page
Number
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|||
|
Item 1A.
|
|||
|
Item 1B.
|
|||
|
Item 2.
|
|||
|
Item 3.
|
|||
|
Item 4.
|
|||
|
Item 5.
|
|||
|
Item 6.
|
|||
|
Item 7.
|
|||
|
Item 7A.
|
|||
|
Item 8.
|
|||
|
Item 9.
|
|||
|
Item 9A.
|
|||
|
Item 9B.
|
|||
|
Item 10.
|
|||
|
Item 11.
|
|||
|
Item 12.
|
|||
|
Item 13.
|
|||
|
Item 14.
|
|||
|
Item 15.
|
|||
|
Item 1.
|
BUSINESS
|
Overview
From our California Gold Rush beginnings, we have grown into one of the world's largest brand-name apparel companies. A history of responsible business practices, rooted in our core values, has helped us build our brands and engender consumer trust around the world. Under our Levi's
®
, Dockers
®
, Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ and Denizen
®
brands, we design, market and sell – directly or through third parties and licensees – products that include jeans, casual and dress pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear, and related accessories for men, women and children around the world.
An Authentic American Icon
Our Levi's
®
brand has become one of the most widely recognized brands in the history of the apparel industry. Its broad distribution reflects the brand's appeal across consumers of all ages and lifestyles. Its merchandising and marketing reflect the brand's core attributes: authentic, courageous, confident, effortless, connected and purposeful.
Our Dockers
®
brand was at the forefront of the business casual trend in the United States, offering an alternative to suit dressing and casual wear that led to the American staple – the khaki pant. The brand quickly planted its stake in the marketplace and today, the Dockers
®
brand has evolved around the world as a market leader in the casual pant category.
Our Global Reach
Our products are sold in more than
110
countries, grouped into three geographic regions: Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. We support our brands throughout these regions through a global infrastructure, developing, sourcing and marketing our products around the world. Although our brands are recognized as authentically “American,” we derive approximately half of our net revenues from outside the United States. A summary of financial information for each geographical region, which comprise our three reporting segments, is found in Note
19
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Our products are sold in approximately
50,000
retail locations worldwide, including approximately
2,800
retail stores, both franchised and company-operated, and shop-in-shops dedicated to our brands. We distribute our Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
products primarily through chain retailers and department stores in the United States and primarily through department stores, specialty retailers, franchised or other brand-dedicated stores and shop-in-shops outside of the United States. Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
products are also sold through our brand-dedicated company-operated stores and through the e-commerce sites we operate, as well as the e-commerce sites operated by certain of our key wholesale customers and other third parties. We distribute Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ and Denizen
®
brand products primarily through mass channel retailers in the Americas.
Levi Strauss & Co. was founded in San Francisco, California, in 1853 and incorporated in Delaware in 1971. We conduct our operations outside the United States through foreign subsidiaries owned directly or indirectly by Levi Strauss & Co. We have headquarter offices in San Francisco, Brussels and Singapore. Our corporate offices are located at Levi's Plaza, 1155 Battery Street, San Francisco, California 94111, and our main telephone number is (415) 501-6000.
Our common stock is primarily owned by descendants of the family of Levi Strauss and their relatives.
Our website –
www.levistrauss.com
– contains additional and detailed information about our history, our products and our commitments. Financial news and reports and related information about our company can be found at
http://levistrauss.com/investors/financial-news
. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1
Our Business Strategies
Our goal is to generate and sustain profitable growth over the long term in order to significantly improve the value of the enterprise. The management team is focused on four key strategies to achieve this goal:
|
•
|
Drive the profitable core business
. Our core businesses create the most value on a brand, geographic, customer or business-segment basis. These include our men's bottoms business for the Levi's
®
brand globally and the Dockers
®
brand in the United States, including our iconic 501
®
jean and Dockers
®
khaki pant. We also consider our key international markets of Mexico, Germany, France and the United Kingdom, as well as key wholesale accounts globally to be vital elements of our long-term growth strategies. Accordingly, we are focused on managing collaborative relationships with these accounts to focus on inventory levels, customer support and marketing planning, in order to achieve mutual commercial success.
|
|
•
|
Expand the reach of our brands and build a more balanced portfolio.
We believe we have opportunities to grow our two largest brands through new or expanded product categories, consumer segments and geographic markets. We are building upon our iconic brands, our innovative design and marketing expertise to deepen our connection with consumers and expand the reach and appeal of our brands globally. For example, we believe we can better serve the female consumer, and that there are significant opportunities in tops, outerwear and accessories. We also believe opportunities remain to expand in emerging and underpenetrated geographic markets, including India, China, Russia and Brazil.
|
|
•
|
Become a world-class omni-channel retailer
. We will continue to expand our consumer reach through brand-dedicated stores globally, including company-operated stores, dedicated e-commerce sites, franchisee and other dedicated store models. We believe these brand-dedicated stores represent an attractive opportunity to establish incremental distribution and sales as well as to showcase the full breadth of our product offerings and deliver a consistent brand experience to the consumer.
|
|
•
|
Leverage our global scale to develop a competitive cost structure
. We are focused on executional excellence: improving productivity, reducing our controllable cost structure and driving efficiencies through our global supply chain. We will balance our pursuit of improved organizational agility and marketplace responsiveness with our cost management efforts.
|
Our Brands and Products
We offer a broad range of products, including jeans, casual and dress pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear and related accessories. Across all of our brands, pants – including jeans, casual pants and dress pants – represented approximately
85%
, 86% and 83% of our total units sold in each of fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively. Men's products generated approximately
78%
, 75% and 72% of our total net sales in each of fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively.
Levi's
®
Brand
The Levi's
®
brand epitomizes classic American style and effortless cool and is positioned as the authentic, original and definitive jeans brand. Since their inception in 1873, Levi's
®
jeans have become one of the most recognizable garments in the world – reflecting the aspirations and earning the loyalty of people for generations. Consumers around the world instantly recognize the distinctive traits of Levi's
®
jeans – the double arc of stitching, known as the Arcuate Stitching Design, and the Red Tab Device, a fabric tab stitched into the back right pocket. Today, the Levi's
®
brand continues to evolve, driven by its distinctive pioneering and innovative spirit. Our range of leading jeanswear and accessories for men, women and children is available in more than
110
countries, allowing individuals around the world to express their personal style.
The Levi's
®
brand encompasses a range of products. Levi's
®
Red Tab™ products are the foundation of the brand, consisting of a wide spectrum of jeans and jeanswear offered in a variety of fits, fabrics, finishes, styles and price points intended to appeal to a broad spectrum of consumers. The line includes the iconic 501
®
jean, the original and best-selling five-pocket jean of all-time. The line also incorporates a full range of jeanswear fits and styles designed specifically for women. Sales of Red Tab™ products represented the majority of our Levi's
®
brand net sales in all three of our regions in fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
. We also offer premium products around the world including a range of premium pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear, and related accessories.
Our Levi's
®
brand products accounted for approximately
84%
, 84% and 83% of our total net sales in fiscal
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively, approximately half of which were generated in our Americas region.
2
Dockers
®
Brand
The Dockers
®
brand has embodied the spirit of khakis for more than 25 years. Since its introduction in 1986, the brand has been perfecting the khaki and the essential goods to go with them. The brand focuses on men, celebrating the re-emergence of khakis as the go-to versatile pant.
Our Dockers
®
brand products accounted for approximately 12% of our total net sales in each of fiscal
2013
,
2012
and
2011
. Although the substantial majority of these net sales were in the Americas region, Dockers
®
brand products are sold in more than 50 countries.
Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ Brand and Denizen
®
Brand
In addition to our Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
brands, we offer two brands focused on consumers who seek high-quality, affordable and fashionable jeanswear from a company they trust. We offer denim jeans, casual pants, tops and jackets in a variety of fits, fabrics and finishes for men, women and kids under the Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ brand through the mass retail channel in the United States and Canada. The Denizen
®
brand was introduced in Target stores in the United States starting in 2011, and includes a variety of jeans, tops and accessories to complement active lifestyles and to empower consumers to express their aspirations, individuality and attitudes at an affordable price point.
Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™
brand and Denizen
®
brand products accounted for approximately 4%, 4% and 5% of our total net sales in fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively.
Licensing
The appeal of our brands across consumer groups and our global reach enable us to license our Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
trademarks for a variety of product categories in multiple markets in each of our regions, including footwear, belts, wallets and bags, outerwear, sweaters, dress shirts, kidswear, sleepwear and hosiery. We also license our Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ and our Denizen
®
trademarks in various markets for certain product categories.
In addition to product category licenses, we enter into regional license agreements with third parties to produce, market and distribute our products in several countries around the world, including various Latin American, Middle Eastern and Asia Pacific countries. Licensing accounted for approximately 2% of our total net revenues in each of fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
.
We enter into licensing agreements with our licensees covering royalty payments, product design and manufacturing standards, marketing and sale of licensed products, and protection of our trademarks. We require our licensees to comply with our code of conduct for contract manufacturing and engage independent monitors to perform regular on-site inspections and assessments of production facilities.
Sales, Distribution and Customers
We distribute our products through a wide variety of retail formats around the world, including chain and department stores, franchise stores dedicated to our brands, our own company-operated retail network, multi-brand specialty stores, mass channel retailers, and both company-operated and retailer e-commerce sites.
Multi-brand Retailers
We seek to make our products available where consumers shop, including offering products and related assortments that are appropriately tailored for our wholesale customers and their retail consumers. Our products are also sold through authorized third-party e-commerce sites. Sales to our top ten wholesale customers accounted for approximately
31%
,
32%
and
30%
of our total net revenues in fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively. No customer represented 10% or more of net revenues in any of these years. The loss of any major wholesale customer could have a material adverse effect on one or more of our segments or on the company as a whole.
Dedicated Stores
We believe retail stores dedicated to our brands are important for the growth, visibility, availability and commercial success of our brands, and they are an increasingly important part of our strategy for expanding distribution of our products. Our brand-dedicated stores are either operated by us or by independent third parties such as franchisees. In addition to the dedicated stores, we maintain brand-dedicated e-commerce sites that sell products directly to retail consumers.
3
Company-operated retail stores
.
Our company-operated online and retail stores, including both mainline and outlet stores, generated approximately
22%
,
21%
and 18% of our net revenues in fiscal
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively. As of
November 24, 2013
, we had
529
company-operated stores, predominantly Levi's
®
stores, located in
33
countries across our three regions. We had
208
stores in the Americas,
201
stores in Europe and
120
stores in Asia Pacific. During
2013
, we added
49
company-operated stores and closed
31
stores.
Franchised and other stores
.
Franchised, licensed, or other forms of brand-dedicated stores operated by independent third parties sell Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
products in markets outside the United States. There were approximately
1,400
of these stores as of
November 24, 2013
, and they are a key element of our international distribution. In addition to these stores, we consider our network of dedicated shop-in-shops located within department stores, which may be either operated directly by us or third parties, to be an important component of our retail distribution in international markets. Outside of the United States, approximately
400
dedicated shop-in-shops were operated directly by us and approximately
500
were operated by third parties as of
November 24, 2013
.
Seasonality of Sales
We typically achieve our largest quarterly revenues in the fourth quarter, reflecting the “holiday” season. In both
2013
and in
2012
, our net revenues in the first, second, third and fourth quarters represented 25%, 23%, 24% and 28%, respectively, of our total net revenues for the year.
Our fiscal year ends on the last Sunday of November in each year, although the fiscal years of certain foreign subsidiaries end on November 30. Each quarter of fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
consisted of 13 weeks.
Marketing and Promotion
We root our marketing in globally consistent brand messages that reflect the unique attributes of our brands, including the Levi's
®
brand as the authentic, original and definitive jeans brand and the Dockers
®
brand as world's best and most loved khaki. We support our brands with a diverse mix of marketing initiatives to drive consumer demand.
We also market through social media and digital and mobile outlets, event and music sponsorships, product placement in leading fashion magazines and with celebrities, personal sponsorships and endorsements, on-the-ground efforts such as street-level events and similar targeted “viral” marketing activities.
We also use our websites,
www.levi.com
,
www.dockers.com
,
www.levistrausssignature.com
, and
www.denizen.com
, in relevant markets to enhance consumer understanding of our brands and help consumers find and buy our products.
Sourcing and Logistics
Organization
.
Our global sourcing and logistics organizations are responsible for taking a product from the design concept stage through production to delivery to our customers. Our objective is to leverage our global scale to achieve product development and sourcing efficiencies and reduce total product and distribution costs while maintaining our focus on local service levels and working capital management.
Product procurement
.
We source nearly all of our products through independent contract manufacturers. The remainder are sourced from our company-operated manufacturing and finishing plants. See “Item 2 – Properties” for more information about those manufacturing facilities.
Sources and availability of raw materials
.
The principal fabrics used in our business are cotton, blends, synthetics and wools. The prices we pay our suppliers for our products are dependent in part on the market price for raw materials used to produce them, primarily cotton. The price and availability of cotton may fluctuate substantially, depending on a variety of factors. The price fluctuations impact the cost of our products in future seasons given the lead time of our product development cycle. Fluctuations in product costs can cause a decrease in our profitability if product pricing actions taken in response were to be insufficient or if those actions were to cause our wholesale customers or retail consumers to reduce the volumes they purchase.
Sourcing locations
.
We use numerous independent contract manufacturers located throughout the world for the production and finishing of our garments. We conduct assessments of political, social, economic, trade, labor and intellectual property protection conditions in the countries in which we source our products before placing production in those countries and on an ongoing basis.
In
2013
, we sourced products from contractors located in more than 30 countries around the world. We sourced products in North and South Asia, South and Central America (including Mexico and the Caribbean), Europe and Africa. No single country accounted for more than 20% of our sourcing in
2013
.
4
Sourcing practices
.
Our sourcing practices include these elements:
|
•
|
We require all third-party contractors and subcontractors who manufacture or finish products for us to comply with our code of conduct relating to supplier working conditions as well as environmental, employment and sourcing practices. We also require our licensees to ensure that their manufacturers comply with our requirements.
|
|
•
|
Our code of conduct covers employment practices such as wages and benefits, working hours, health and safety, working age and discriminatory practices, environmental matters such as wastewater treatment and solid waste disposal, and ethical and legal conduct.
|
|
•
|
We regularly assess manufacturing and finishing facilities through periodic on-site facility inspections and improvement activities, including use of independent monitors to supplement our internal staff. We integrate review and performance results into our sourcing decisions.
|
We disclose the names and locations of our contract manufacturers to encourage collaboration among apparel companies in factory monitoring and improvement. We regularly evaluate and refine our code of conduct processes.
Logistics
.
We operate dedicated distribution centers in a number of countries. For more information, see “Item 2 – Properties.” Distribution center activities include receiving finished goods from our contractors and plants, inspecting those products, preparing them for retail presentation, and shipping them to our customers and to our own stores. Our distribution centers maintain a combination of replenishment and seasonal inventory from which we ship to our stores and wholesale customers. In certain locations around the globe we have consolidated our distribution centers to service multiple countries. In addition, we outsource some of our logistics activities to third-party logistics providers.
Competition
The global apparel industry is highly competitive and fragmented. It is characterized by low barriers to entry, brands targeted at specific consumer segments, many regional and local competitors, and an increasing number of global competitors. Principal competitive factors include:
|
•
|
developing products with relevant fits, finishes, fabrics, style and performance features;
|
|
•
|
maintaining favorable brand recognition and appeal through strong and effective marketing in diverse market segments;
|
|
•
|
anticipating and responding to changing consumer demands and apparel trends in a timely manner;
|
|
•
|
securing desirable retail locations and presenting products effectively at company-operated retail and franchised and other brand-dedicated stores;
|
|
•
|
ensuring product availability at wholesale and e-commerce channels, and at company-operated retail, franchised and other brand-dedicated stores;
|
|
•
|
optimizing supply chain cost efficiencies and product development cycle lead times;
|
|
•
|
delivering compelling value for the price in diverse market segments; and
|
|
•
|
generating competitive economics for wholesale customers, including retailers, franchisees, and distributors.
|
We face competition from a broad range of competitors at the global, regional and local levels in diverse channels across a wide range of retail price points. Globally, a few of our primary competitors include vertically integrated specialty stores operated by such companies such as The Gap, Inc. and The Inditex Group; jeanswear brands such as those marketed by VF Corporation, a competitor in multiple channels and product lines including through their Wrangler, Lee and Seven for All Mankind brands; khakiwear brands such as Haggar; and athletic wear companies such as adidas Group, NIKE, Inc. and lululemon athletica inc. In addition, each region faces local or regional competition; and in the Americas, retailers' private or exclusive labels such as those from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Faded Glory brand), Target Corporation (Mossimo and Merona brands) and JC Penney (Arizona brand). Many of our regional competitors are also seeking to expand globally through an expanded store footprint and the e-commerce channel. For more information on the factors affecting our competitive position, see “Item 1A – Risk Factors.”
Trademarks
We have more than 5,000 trademark registrations and pending applications in approximately 180 jurisdictions worldwide, and we acquire rights in new trademarks according to business needs. Substantially all of our global trademarks are owned by Levi Strauss & Co., the parent and U.S. operating company. We regard our trademarks as our most valuable assets and believe they have substantial value in the marketing of our products. The Levi's
®
, Dockers
®
and 501
®
trademarks, the Arcuate Stitching Design, the Tab Device, the Two Horse
®
Design, the Housemark and the Wings and Anchor Design
are among our core trademarks.
5
We protect these trademarks by registering them with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and with governmental agencies in other countries, particularly where our products are manufactured or sold. We work vigorously to enforce and protect our trademark rights by engaging in regular market reviews, helping local law enforcement authorities detect and prosecute counterfeiters, issuing cease-and-desist letters against third parties infringing or denigrating our trademarks, opposing registration of infringing trademarks, and initiating litigation as necessary. We currently are pursuing approximately 400 infringement matters around the world. We also work with trade groups and industry participants seeking to strengthen laws relating to the protection of intellectual property rights in markets around the world.
Employees
As of
November 24, 2013
, we employed approximately 16,000 people, approximately 9,000 of whom were located in the Americas, 4,600 in Europe, and 2,400 in Asia Pacific. Approximately 4,200 of our employees were associated with the manufacturing and procurement of our products, 7,200 worked in retail, including seasonal employees, 1,600 worked in distribution and 3,000 were other non-production employees.
History and Corporate Citizenship
Our history and longevity are unique in the apparel industry. Our commitment to quality, innovation and corporate citizenship began with our founder, Levi Strauss, who infused the business with the principle of responsible commercial success that has been embedded in our business practices throughout our more than 150-year history. This mixture of history, quality, innovation and corporate citizenship contributes to the iconic reputations of our brands.
In 1853, during the California Gold Rush, Mr. Strauss opened a wholesale dry goods business in San Francisco that became known as “Levi Strauss & Co.” Seeing a need for work pants that could hold up under rough conditions, he and Jacob Davis, a tailor, created the first jean. In 1873, they received a U.S. patent for “waist overalls” with metal rivets at points of strain. The first product line designated by the lot number “501” was created in 1890.
In the 19
th
and early 20
th
centuries, our work pants were worn primarily by cowboys, miners and other working men in the western United States. Then, in 1934, we introduced our first jeans for women, and after World War II, our jeans began to appeal to a wider market. By the 1960s, they had become a symbol of American culture, representing a unique blend of history and youth. We opened our export and international businesses in the 1950s and 1960s. In 1986, we introduced the Dockers
®
brand of casual apparel which revolutionized the concept of business casual.
Throughout this long history, we upheld our strong belief that we can help shape society through civic engagement and community involvement, responsible labor and workplace practices, philanthropy, ethical conduct, environmental stewardship and transparency. We have engaged in a “profits through principles” business approach from the earliest years of the business. Among our milestone initiatives over the years, we integrated our factories two decades prior to the U.S. civil rights movement and federally mandated desegregation, we developed a comprehensive supplier code of conduct requiring safe and healthy working conditions among our suppliers (a first of its kind for a multinational apparel company), and we offered full medical benefits to domestic partners of employees prior to other companies of our size, a practice that is widely accepted today.
|
Item 1A.
|
RISK FACTORS
|
Risks Relating to the Industry in Which We Compete
Our revenues are influenced by economic conditions that impact consumer spending.
Apparel is a cyclical industry that is dependent upon the overall level of consumer spending. Our wholesale customers anticipate and respond to adverse changes in economic conditions and uncertainty by reducing inventories and canceling orders. Our brand-dedicated stores are also affected by these conditions which may lead to a decline in consumer traffic to, and spending in, these stores. As a result, factors that diminish consumer spending and confidence in any of the markets in which we compete, particularly deterioration in general economic conditions, volatility in investment returns, fear of unemployment, increases in energy costs or interest rates, housing market downturns, fear about and impact of pandemic illness, and other factors such as acts of war, acts of nature or terrorist or political events that impact consumer confidence, could reduce our sales and adversely affect our business and financial condition through their impact on our wholesale customers as well as its direct impact on us. These outcomes and behaviors have, and may continue to, adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Intense competition in the global apparel industry could lead to reduced sales and
prices.
We face a variety of competitive challenges in the global apparel industry from a variety of jeanswear and casual apparel marketers, and competition has increased over the years due to factors such as the international expansion and increased presence
6
of vertically integrated specialty stores; expansion into e-commerce by existing and new competitors; the proliferation of private labels or exclusive labels offered by department stores, chain stores and mass channel retailers; the introduction of jeans and casual apparel by well-known and successful athletic wear marketers; and the movement of apparel companies who traditionally relied on wholesale distribution channels into their own retail distribution network. Some of these competitors have greater financial and marketing resources than we do and may be able to adapt to changes in consumer preferences or retail requirements more quickly, devote greater resources to the building and sustaining of their brand equity and the marketing and sale of their products. In addition, some of these competitors may not respond to changing sourcing conditions in the same manner we do, and may be able to achieve lower product costs or adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. As a result, we may not be able to compete as effectively with them and may not be able to maintain or grow the demand for our products. These evolving competitive factors could reduce our sales and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
The success of our business depends upon our ability to offer innovative and updated
products at attractive price points.
The global apparel industry is characterized by constant product innovation due to changing fashion trends and consumer preferences and by the rapid replication of new products by competitors. As a result, our success depends in large part on our ability to develop, market and deliver innovative and stylish products at a pace, intensity, and price competitive with other brands in the markets in which we sell our products. In addition, we must create products at a range of price points that appeal to the consumers of both our wholesale customers and our dedicated retail stores situated in each of our diverse geographic regions. Our development and production cycles take place prior to full visibility into all of these factors for the coming seasons. Failure on our part to forecast consumer demand and market conditions and to regularly and rapidly develop innovative and stylish products and update core products could limit sales growth, adversely affect retail and consumer acceptance of our products, negatively impact the consumer traffic in our dedicated retail stores, leave us with a substantial amount of unsold inventory which we may be forced to sell at discounted prices, all of which may adversely affect our gross margin, and impair the image of our brands on a local, regional and global level. Moreover, our newer products may not produce as high a gross margin as our traditional products and thus may have an adverse effect on our overall margins and profitability.
The global apparel industry is subject to ongoing pricing pressure.
The apparel market is characterized by low barriers to entry for both suppliers and marketers, global sourcing through suppliers located throughout the world, trade liberalization, continuing movement of product sourcing to lower cost countries, and the ongoing emergence of new competitors with widely varying strategies and resources. These factors have contributed, and may continue to contribute, to ongoing pricing pressure and uncertainty throughout the supply chain. Pricing pressure has been exacerbated by the variability of raw material and energy costs in recent years. This pressure could have the following effects:
|
•
|
require us to raise wholesale prices on existing products resulting in decreased sales volume;
|
|
•
|
result in reduced gross margins across our product lines;
|
|
•
|
increase retailer demands for allowances, incentives and other forms of economic support; and
|
|
•
|
increase pressure on us to reduce our production costs and our operating expenses.
|
Any of these factors could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Increases in the price of raw materials could increase
our cost of goods and negatively impact our financial results.
The principal materials used in our business are cotton, blends, synthetics and wools. The prices we pay our suppliers for our products are dependent in part on the market price for raw materials used to produce them, primarily cotton. The price and availability of cotton may fluctuate substantially, depending on a variety of factors, including demand, acreage devoted to cotton crops and crop yields, weather, supply conditions, transportation costs, energy prices, work stoppages, government regulation and government policy, economic climates, market speculation and other unpredictable factors. Any and all of these factors may be exacerbated by global climate change. Cotton prices suffered from unprecedented variability and uncertainty in the past several years and may fluctuate significantly again in the future. Increases in raw material costs, unless sufficiently offset with our pricing actions, may cause a decrease in our profitability and impact our sales volume. These factors may also have an adverse impact on our cash and working capital needs as well as those of our suppliers.
Our business is subject to risks associated with sourcing and manufacturing overseas.
We import both raw materials and finished garments into all of our operating regions. Our ability to import products in a timely and cost-effective manner may be affected by conditions at ports or issues that otherwise affect transportation and warehousing providers, such as port and shipping capacity, labor disputes and work stoppages, political unrest, severe weather, or security requirements in the United States and other countries. These issues could delay importation of products or require us to
7
locate alternative ports or warehousing providers to avoid disruption to our customers. These alternatives may not be available on short notice or could result in higher transportation costs, which could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition, specifically our gross margin and overall profitability.
Substantially all of our import operations are subject to customs and tax requirements as well as trade regulations, such as tariffs and quotas set by governments through mutual agreements or bilateral actions. In addition, the countries in which our products are manufactured or imported may from time to time impose additional quotas, duties, tariffs or other restrictions on our imports or adversely modify existing restrictions. Adverse changes in these import costs and restrictions, or our suppliers' failure to comply with customs regulations or similar laws, could harm our business.
Our operations are also subject to the effects of international trade agreements and regulations such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Dominican-Republic Central America Free Trade Agreement, the Egypt Qualified Industrial Zone program, and the activities and regulations of the World Trade Organization. Although generally these trade agreements have positive effects on trade liberalization, sourcing flexibility and cost of goods by reducing or eliminating the duties and/or quotas assessed on products manufactured in a particular country, trade agreements can also impose requirements that adversely affect our business, such as setting quotas on products that may be imported from a particular country into our key markets such as the United States or the European Union.
Risks Relating to Our Business
We depend on a group of key wholesale customers for a significant portion of our revenues. A
significant adverse change in a customer relationship or in a customer's performance
or financial position could harm our business and financial condition.
Sales to our top ten wholesale customers accounted for approximately
31%
,
32%
and
30%
of our total net revenues in fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively. No customer represented 10% or more of net revenues in any of these years. While we have long-standing relationships with our wholesale customers, we do not have long-term contracts with them. As a result, purchases generally occur on an order-by-order basis, and the relationship, as well as particular orders, can generally be terminated by either party at any time. If any major wholesale customer decreases or ceases its purchases from us, reduces the floor space, assortments, fixtures or advertising for our products or changes its manner of doing business with us for any reason, such actions could adversely affect our business and financial condition. In addition, a wholesale customer may revise its strategy to one that shifts its focus away from our typical consumer or that otherwise results in a reduction of its sales of our products generally, negatively impacting our sales through that channel. Also, a decline in the performance or financial condition of a major wholesale customer – including bankruptcy – may cause us to alter our business terms or to cease doing business with that customer, which could in turn adversely affect our own business and financial condition.
The retail industry in the United States has experienced substantial consolidation over the last decade, and further consolidation may occur. Consolidation in the retail industry typically results in store closures, centralized purchasing decisions, increased customer leverage over suppliers, greater exposure for suppliers to credit risk and an increased emphasis by retailers on inventory management and productivity, any of which can, and have, adversely impacted our net revenues, margins and ability to operate efficiently.
We may be unable to maintain or increase our sales through our primary distribution channels.
In the United States, chain stores and department stores are the primary distribution channels for our Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
products. Outside the United States, department stores and independent jeanswear retailers have traditionally been our primary distribution channels.
We may be unable to maintain or increase sales of our products through these distribution channels for several reasons, including the following:
|
•
|
The retailers in these channels maintain – and seek to grow – substantial private-label and exclusive offerings as they strive to differentiate the brands and products they offer from those of their competitors.
|
|
•
|
These retailers may also change their apparel strategies and reduce fixture spaces and purchases of brands misaligned with their strategic requirements.
|
|
•
|
Other channels, including vertically integrated specialty stores, account for a substantial portion of jeanswear and casual wear sales. In some of our mature markets, these stores have already placed competitive pressure on our primary distribution channels, and many of these stores are now looking to our developing markets to grow their business.
|
|
•
|
Shrinking points of distribution, inclusive of fewer doors at our customer locations.
|
8
Further success by retailer private-labels and vertically integrated specialty stores may continue to adversely affect the sales of our products across all channels, as well as the profitability of our brand-dedicated stores. Additionally, our ability to secure or maintain retail floor space, market share and sales in these channels depends on our ability to offer differentiated products and to increase retailer profitability on our products, which could have an adverse impact on our margins.
If we encounter problems with our distribution channels, our ability to deliver our products to market could be adversely affected.
We rely on company-owned and independently-operated distribution facilities to warehouse and ship products to our wholesale customers and e-commerce consumers. Our distribution system includes computer-controlled and automated equipment, which may be subject to a number of risks related to security or computer viruses, the proper operation of software and hardware, power interruptions or other system failures. While these risks cannot be completely eliminated, we have implemented various maintenance programs and contingency plans and also work with our suppliers to mitigate these risks at both our company-owned and independently operated distribution facilities.
We are focused on executional excellence, including improving productivity, reducing our controllable cost structure and driving efficiencies through our global supply chain. As part of the pursuit for improved organizational agility and marketplace responsiveness, we may consolidate the number of distribution facilities we rely upon. As a potential consequence of such consolidation, our operations could also be interrupted by work stoppages, labor disputes, earthquakes, floods, fires or other natural disasters affecting our distribution centers. In addition, our distribution capacity is dependent on the timely performance of services by third parties, including the transportation of product to and from its distribution facilities. If we encounter problems with our distribution system, our ability to meet wholesale customer and e-commerce consumer expectations, manage inventory, complete sales and achieve operating efficiencies could be adversely affected.
The loss of members of the Company’s executive management and other key employees could harm our business.
Our future success depends in part on the continued service of our executive management team and other key employees. The unexpected loss of the services of any key individual could harm our business. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate our employees sufficiently, both to maintain our current business and to execute our strategic initiatives. Competition for experienced and well-qualified employees in our industry is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
If we are unable to effectively execute our e-commerce business our reputation and operating results may be harmed.
While still comprising a small portion of our net revenues, e-commerce has been our fastest growing business over the last several years. The success of our e-commerce business depends, in part, on third parties and factors over which we have limited control, including changing consumer confidence, preferences and buying trends relating to e-commerce usage, both domestically and abroad, as well as promotional or other advertising initiatives employed by our wholesale customers or other third parties on their e-commerce sites.
We are also vulnerable to certain additional risks and uncertainties associated with our e-commerce sites, including: changes in required technology interfaces; website downtime and other technical failures; costs and technical issues as we upgrade our website software; computer viruses; and changes in applicable federal and state regulations. In addition, we must keep up to date with competitive technology trends, including the use of new or improved technology, creative user interfaces and other e-commerce marketing tools such as paid search and mobile applications, among others, which may increase our costs and which may not succeed in increasing sales or attracting consumers. Our competitors, some of whom have greater resources than us, may also be able to benefit from changes in e-commerce technologies, which could harm our competitive position. Our failure to successfully respond to these risks and uncertainties might adversely affect the sales in our e-commerce business, as well as damage our reputation and brands.
Additionally, the success of our e-commerce business and the satisfaction of our consumers depends on their timely receipt of our products. The efficient flow of our products requires that our company-operated and third-party operated distribution facilities have adequate capacity to support the current level of e-commerce operations, and any anticipated increased levels that may follow from the growth of our e-commerce business. If we encounter difficulties with our distribution facilities or in our relationships with the third parties who operate the facilities, or if any facilities were to shut down for any reason, including as a result of fire or other natural disaster, we could face shortages of inventory, resulting in "out of stock" conditions in the e-commerce sites we operate, those operated by our wholesale customers or other third parties, incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to our consumers and experience dissatisfaction from our consumers. Any of these issues could have a material adverse effect on our business and harm our reputation.
9
Any major disruption or failure of our information technology
systems could adversely affect our business and operations.
We rely on
various information technology systems to manage our operations. Over the last several years, we have been and continue to implement modifications and upgrades to our systems, including making changes to legacy systems, replacing legacy systems with successor systems with new functionality and acquiring new systems with new functionality. These types of activities subject us to inherent costs and risks associated with replacing and changing these systems, including impairment of our ability to fulfill customer orders, potential disruption of our internal control structure, substantial capital expenditures, additional administration and operating expenses, retention of sufficiently skilled personnel to implement and operate the new systems, demands on management time, and other risks and costs of delays or difficulties in transitioning to new systems or of integrating new systems into our current systems. Our system implementations may not result in productivity improvements at a level that outweighs the costs of implementation, or at all. In addition, the difficulties with implementing new technology systems may cause disruptions in our business operations and have an adverse effect on our business and operations, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated.
We face cybersecurity risks and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks.
We utilize systems and websites that allow for the secure storage and transmission of proprietary or confidential information regarding our customers, employees, and others, including credit card information and personal identification information. A security breach may expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation, and potential liability. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly-evolving types of cyber attacks. Attacks may be targeted at us, our customers, or others who have entrusted us with information. Actual or anticipated attacks may cause us to incur costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees, and engage third-party experts and consultants. Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries, or other developments may result in the technology used by us to protect transaction or other data being breached or compromised. In addition, data and security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including breach by us or by persons with whom we have commercial relationships that result in the unauthorized release of personal or confidential information. Any compromise or breach of our security could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and our reputation.
We currently rely on contract manufacturing of our products. Our inability to secure
production sources meeting our quality, cost, working conditions and other
requirements, or failures by our contractors to perform, could harm our sales,
service levels and reputation.
We source approximately 95% of our products from independent contract manufacturers who purchase fabric and make our products and may also provide us with design and development services. As a result, we must locate and secure production capacity. We depend on independent manufacturers to maintain adequate financial resources, including access to sufficient credit, secure a sufficient supply of raw materials, and maintain sufficient development and manufacturing capacity in an environment characterized by continuing cost pressure and demands for product innovation and speed-to-market. In addition, we currently do not have any material long-term contracts with any of our independent manufacturers. Under our current arrangements with our independent manufacturers, these manufacturers generally may unilaterally terminate their relationship with us at any time. Finally, while we have historically worked with numerous manufacturers, in the past several years we have begun consolidating the number of independent manufacturers from which we source our products. Reliance on fewer numbers of independent manufacturers involves risk and any difficulties or failures to perform by our independent contract manufacturers could cause delays in product shipments or otherwise negatively affect our results of operations.
Our suppliers are subject to the fluctuations in general economic cycles, and the global economic conditions may impact their ability to operate their business. They may also be impacted by the increasing costs of raw materials, labor and distribution, resulting in demands for less attractive contract terms or an inability for them to meet our requirements or conduct their own businesses. The performance and financial condition of a supplier may cause us to alter our business terms or to cease doing business with a particular supplier, or change our sourcing practices generally, which could in turn adversely affect our own business and financial condition.
Our dependence on contract manufacturing could subject us to difficulty in obtaining timely delivery of products of acceptable quality. A contractor's failure to ship products to us in a timely manner or to meet our quality standards, or interference with our ability to receive shipments due to factors such as port or transportation conditions, could cause us to miss the delivery date requirements of our customers. Failing to make timely deliveries may cause our customers to cancel orders, refuse to accept deliveries, impose non-compliance charges, demand reduced prices, or reduce future orders, any of which could harm our sales and margins.
We require contractors to meet our standards in terms of working conditions, environmental protection, raw materials, security and other matters before we are willing to place business with them. As such, we may not be able to obtain the lowest-cost
10
production. In addition, the labor and business practices of apparel manufacturers have received increased attention from the media, non-governmental organizations, consumers and governmental agencies in recent years. Any failure by our independent manufacturers to adhere to labor or other laws or appropriate labor or business practices, and the potential litigation, negative publicity and political pressure relating to any of these events, could harm our business and reputation.
Regulatory developments such as the use of “conflict” minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries could affect the sourcing and availability of raw materials used by our suppliers in the manufacture of certain of our products. We may be subject to costs associated with new regulations, including for the diligence pertaining to the presence of any conflict minerals used in our products and the cost of remediation and other changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. The impact of the regulations may result in a limited pool of suppliers who provide conflict free metals, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain products in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Also, because our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational challenges with our consumers and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all metals used in the products that we sell.
We are a global company with significant revenues and earnings generated internationally, which exposes us to political and economic risks as well as the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
In addition to our significant international revenues and earnings, a substantial amount of our products come from sources outside of the country of distribution. As a result, we are subject to the risks of doing business outside of the United States, including:
|
•
|
currency fluctuations, which have impacted our results of operations significantly in recent years;
|
|
•
|
political, economic and social instability;
|
|
•
|
changes in tariffs and taxes;
|
|
•
|
regulatory restrictions on repatriating foreign funds back to the United States; and
|
|
•
|
less protective foreign laws relating to intellectual property.
|
The functional currency for most of our foreign operations is the applicable local currency. As a result, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect the results of our operations and the value of our foreign assets and liabilities, including debt, which in turn may benefit or adversely affect results of operations and cash flows and the comparability of period-to-period results of operations. In addition, we engage in hedging activities to manage our foreign currency exposures resulting from certain product sourcing activities, some intercompany sales, foreign subsidiaries' royalty payments, earnings repatriations, net investment in foreign operations and funding activities. However, our earnings may be subject to volatility since we do not fully hedge our foreign currency exposures and we are required to record in income the changes in the market values of our exposure management instruments that we do not designate or that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Changes in the value of the relevant currencies may affect the cost of certain items required in our operations as the majority of our sourcing activities are conducted in U.S. Dollars. Changes in currency exchange rates may also affect the relative prices at which we and foreign competitors sell products in the same market. Foreign policies and actions regarding currency valuation could result in actions by the
United States and other countries
to
offset the effects of such fluctuations. Given the unpredictability and volatility of foreign currency exchange rates, ongoing or unusual volatility may adversely impact our business and financial conditions.
Furthermore, due to our global operations, we are subject to numerous domestic and foreign laws and regulations affecting our business, such as those related to labor, employment, worker health and safety, antitrust and competition, environmental protection, consumer protection, import/export, and anti-corruption, including but not limited to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act which prohibits giving anything of value intended to influence the awarding of government contracts.
Although we have put into place
policies and procedures aimed at ensuring legal and regulatory compliance, our
employees, subcontractors and agents could take actions that violate these
requirements. Violations of these regulations could subject us to criminal or
civil enforcement actions, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
As a global company, we are exposed to risks of doing business in foreign jurisdictions and risks relating to U.S. policy with respect to companies doing business in foreign jurisdictions. Legislation or other changes in the U.S. tax laws could increase our U.S. income tax liability and adversely affect our after-tax profitability.
If one or more of our counterparty financial institutions default on their obligations to us, we may incur significant losses.
As part of our hedging activities, we enter into transactions involving derivative financial instruments, which may include forward contracts, commodity futures contracts, option contracts, collars and swaps, with various financial institutions. In addition, we have significant amounts of cash, cash equivalents and other investments on deposit or in accounts with banks or other financial institutions in the United States and abroad. As a result, we are exposed to the risk of default by or failure of counterparty financial institutions. The risk of counterparty default or failure may be heightened during economic downturns and periods of uncertainty
11
in the financial markets. If one of our counterparties were to become insolvent or file for bankruptcy, our ability to recover losses incurred as a result of default or our assets that are deposited or held in accounts with such counterparty may be limited by the counterparty’s liquidity or the applicable laws governing the insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings. In the event of default or failure of one or more of our counterparties, we could incur significant losses, which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Most of the employees in our production and distribution facilities are covered by collective
bargaining agreements, and any material job actions could negatively affect our
results of operations.
In North America, most of our distribution employees are covered by various collective bargaining agreements, and outside North America, most of our production and distribution employees are covered by either industry-sponsored and/or state-sponsored collective bargaining mechanisms. Any work stoppages or other job actions by these employees could harm our business and reputation.
Our licensees may not comply
with our product quality, manufacturing standards, marketing and other requirements which could negatively affect our reputation and business.
We license our trademarks to third parties for manufacturing, marketing and distribution of various products. While we enter into comprehensive agreements with our licensees covering product design, product quality, sourcing, manufacturing, marketing and other requirements, our licensees may not comply fully with those agreements. Non-compliance could include marketing products under our brand names that do not meet our quality and other requirements or engaging in manufacturing practices that do not meet our supplier code of conduct. These activities could harm our brand equity, our reputation and our business.
Our success depends on the continued protection of our trademarks and other
proprietary intellectual property rights.
Our trademarks and other intellectual property rights are important to our success and competitive position, and the loss of or inability to enforce trademark and other proprietary intellectual property rights could harm our business. We devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our trademark and other proprietary intellectual property rights on a global basis. Our efforts to establish and protect our trademark and other proprietary intellectual property rights may not be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products. Unauthorized copying of our products or unauthorized use of our trademarks or other proprietary rights may not only erode sales of our products but may also cause significant damage to our brand names and our ability to effectively represent ourselves to our customers, contractors, suppliers and/or licensees. Moreover, others may seek to assert rights in, or ownership of, our trademarks and other proprietary intellectual property, and we may not be able to successfully resolve those claims. In addition, the laws and enforcement mechanisms of some foreign countries may not allow us to protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as we are able to in the United States and other countries.
We have substantial liabilities and cash requirements associated with postretirement benefits, pension and our deferred compensation plans.
Our postretirement benefits, pension, and our deferred compensation plans result in substantial liabilities on our balance sheet. These plans and activities have and will generate substantial cash requirements for us, and these requirements may increase beyond our expectations in future years based on changing market conditions. The difference between plan obligations and assets, or the funded status of the plans, is a significant factor in determining the net periodic benefit costs of our pension plans and the ongoing funding requirements of those plans. Many variables, such as changes in interest rates, mortality rates, health care costs, investment returns, and/or the market value of plan assets can affect the funded status of our defined benefit pension, other postretirement, and postemployment benefit plans and cause volatility in the net periodic benefit cost and future funding requirements of the plans. Plan liabilities may impair our liquidity, have an unfavorable impact on our ability to obtain financing and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to some of our competitors who do not have such liabilities and cash requirements.
Earthquakes or other events outside of our control may damage our facilities or the
facilities of third parties on which we depend.
Our global headquarters and the headquarters of our Americas region are both located in California near major geologic faults that have experienced earthquakes in the past. An earthquake or other natural disaster or the loss of power caused by power shortages could disrupt operations or impair critical systems. Any of these disruptions or other events outside of our control could affect our business negatively, harming our operating results. In addition, if any of our other facilities, including our manufacturing, finishing or distribution facilities or our company-operated or franchised stores, or the facilities of our suppliers or customers, is affected by earthquakes, tsunamis, power shortages, floods, monsoons, terrorism, epidemics, political instability or conflict or
12
other events outside of our control, our business could suffer.
The Company has plans in place to mitigate the impact of these types of events on its own facilities including the geographic diversity of our IT infrastructure, the duplication of headquarter locations, training and education of employees for such circumstances, and the capacity for many employees to work remotely. Oversight to these preparedness strategies is provided by several committees comprised of key functions representing the regions in which the company does business. However, we cannot assure that these mitigation plans will offset the impact of such events, and we cannot control the impact of such events on the operations of our suppliers or customers.
Risks Relating to Our Debt
We have debt and interest payment requirements at a level that may restrict our
future operations.
As of
November 24, 2013
, we had approximately
$1.5 billion
of unsecured debt, and we had
$635.3 million
of additional borrowing capacity under our senior secured revolving credit facility. Our debt requires us to dedicate a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the payment of interest and principal due under our debt, which will reduce funds available for other business purposes, and result in us having lower net income than we would otherwise have had. This dedicated use of cash could impact our ability to successfully compete by, for example:
|
•
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
|
•
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and industry;
|
|
•
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to some of our competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
•
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing required to fund working capital and capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.
|
In addition, borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility bears interest at variable rates. As a result, increases in market interest rates would require a greater portion of our cash flow to be used to pay interest, which could further hinder our operations. Increase in market interest rates may also affect the trading price of our debt securities that bear interest at a fixed rate. Our ability to satisfy our obligations and to reduce our total debt depends on our future operating performance and on economic, financial, competitive and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Volatility in the capital markets could affect our ability to access capital or could increase our costs of capital.
A downturn or disruption in the credit markets may reduce sources of liquidity available to us or increase our costs of capital, which could impact our ability to maintain or grow our business, which in turn may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Restrictions in our notes, indentures and senior
secured revolving credit facility may limit our activities, including dividend
payments, share repurchases and acquisitions.
The indentures relating to our senior unsecured notes, our Euro notes, our Yen-denominated Eurobonds and our senior secured revolving credit facility contain restrictions, including covenants limiting our ability to incur additional debt, grant liens, make acquisitions and other investments, prepay specified debt, consolidate, merge or acquire other businesses, sell assets, pay dividends and other distributions, repurchase stock, and enter into transactions with affiliates. These restrictions, in combination with our leveraged condition, may make it more difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy, grow our business or compete with companies not similarly restricted.
If our foreign subsidiaries are unable to distribute cash to us when needed, we may
be unable to satisfy our obligations under our debt securities, which could force us
to sell assets or use cash that we were planning to use elsewhere in our
business.
We conduct our international operations through foreign subsidiaries, and therefore we depend upon funds from our foreign subsidiaries for a portion of the funds necessary to meet our debt service obligations. We only receive the cash that remains after our foreign subsidiaries satisfy their obligations. Any agreements our foreign subsidiaries enter into with other parties, as well as applicable laws and regulations limiting the right and ability of non-U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates to pay dividends and remit cash to affiliated companies, may restrict the ability of our foreign subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. If those subsidiaries are unable to pass on the amount of cash that we need, we will be unable to make payments on our debt obligations, which could force us to sell assets or use cash that we were planning on using elsewhere in our business, which could hinder our operations and affect the trading price of our debt securities.
13
|
Item 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
|
Item 2.
|
PROPERTIES
|
We conduct manufacturing, distribution and administrative activities in owned and leased facilities. We operate four manufacturing-related facilities abroad and eight distribution centers around the world. We have renewal rights for most of our property leases. We anticipate that we will be able to extend these leases on terms satisfactory to us or, if necessary, locate substitute facilities on acceptable terms. We believe our facilities and equipment are in good condition and are suitable for our needs. Information about our key operating properties in use as of
November 24, 2013
, is summarized in the following table
:
|
Location
|
Primary Use
|
Leased/Owned
|
||||
|
Americas
|
|
|
||||
|
San Francisco, CA
|
Design and Product Development
|
Leased
|
||||
|
Hebron, KY
|
Distribution
|
Owned
|
||||
|
Canton, MS
|
Distribution
|
Owned
|
||||
|
Henderson, NV
|
Distribution
|
Owned
|
||||
|
Westlake, TX
|
Data Center
|
Leased
|
||||
|
Etobicoke, Canada
|
Distribution
|
Owned
|
||||
|
Cuautitlan, Mexico
|
Distribution
|
Leased
|
||||
|
Europe
|
|
|
||||
|
Plock, Poland
|
Manufacturing and Finishing
|
Leased
(1)
|
||||
|
Northhampton, U.K.
|
Distribution
|
Owned
|
||||
|
Sabadell, Spain
|
Distribution
|
Leased
|
||||
|
Corlu, Turkey
|
Finishing and Distribution
|
Owned
|
||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
||||
|
Adelaide, Australia
|
Distribution
|
Leased
|
||||
|
Cape Town, South Africa
|
Manufacturing, Finishing and Distribution
|
Leased
|
||||
|
Ninh Binh, Vietnam
|
Finishing
|
Leased
|
||||
______________
|
(1)
|
Building and improvements are owned but subject to a ground lease.
|
Our global headquarters and the headquarters of our Americas region are both located in leased premises in San Francisco, California. Our Europe and Asia Pacific headquarters are located in leased premises in Brussels, Belgium and Singapore, respectively. In addition to the above, we operate finance shared service centers in Eugene, Oregon and Singapore. As of
November 24, 2013
, we also leased or owned 105 administrative and sales offices in 42 countries, as well as leased 18 warehouses in nine countries.
In addition, as of
November 24, 2013
, we had
529
company-operated retail and outlet stores in leased premises in
33
countries. We had
208
stores in the Americas region,
201
stores in the Europe region and
120
stores in the Asia Pacific region.
|
Item 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
In the ordinary course of business, we have various pending cases involving contractual matters, facility and employee-related matters, distribution matters, product liability claims, trademark infringement and other matters. We do not believe any of these pending legal proceedings will have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
|
Item 4.
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
None.
14
|
Item 5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Our common stock is primarily owned by descendants of the family of Levi Strauss and their relatives. Shares of our common stock are not publicly held or traded. All shares are subject to a stockholders' agreement. The agreement, which expires in April 2016, limits the transfer of shares to other holders, family members, specified charities and foundations and back to the Company. The agreement does not provide for registration rights or other contractual devices for forcing a public sale of shares or certificates, or other access to liquidity.
As of
February 6, 2014
, there were
281
record holders of our common stock. Our shares are not registered on any national securities exchange, there is no established public trading market for our shares and none of our shares are convertible into shares of any other class of stock or other securities.
We paid a cash dividend of
$25.1 million
on our common stock in the first quarter of
2013
, and cash dividends of
$20.0 million
in the first half of each of
2012
and
2011
. Subsequent to the fiscal year-end, on February 5, 2014, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $30.0 million. Please see Note
14
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report for more information. The Company does not have an established annual dividend policy. The Company will continue to review its ability to pay cash dividends at least annually, and dividends may be declared at the discretion of our board of directors depending upon, among other factors, the income tax impact to the dividend recipients, our financial condition and compliance with the terms of our debt agreements. Our debt arrangements limit our ability to pay dividends. For more detailed information about these limitations, see Note
6
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
We repurchased a total of 8,018 shares of our common stock during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended
November 24, 2013
, in connection with the exercise of call rights under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. For more detailed information, see Note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
15
|
Item 6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial data which are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for
2013
,
2012
,
2011
,
2010
and
2009
. The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, “Item 7 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our audited consolidated financial statements for
2013
,
2012
and
2011
and the related notes to those audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report.
|
Year Ended November 24, 2013
|
Year Ended November 25, 2012
|
Year Ended November 27, 2011
|
Year Ended November 28, 2010
|
Year Ended November 29, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Statements of Income Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
4,681,691
|
|
$
|
4,610,193
|
|
$
|
4,761,566
|
|
$
|
4,410,649
|
|
$
|
4,105,766
|
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
2,331,219
|
|
2,410,862
|
|
2,469,327
|
|
2,187,726
|
|
2,132,361
|
|
|||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
2,350,472
|
|
2,199,331
|
|
2,292,239
|
|
2,222,923
|
|
1,973,405
|
|
|||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
1,884,965
|
|
1,865,352
|
|
1,955,846
|
|
1,841,562
|
|
1,595,317
|
|
|||||||||
|
Operating income
|
465,507
|
|
333,979
|
|
336,393
|
|
381,361
|
|
378,088
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(129,024
|
)
|
(134,694
|
)
|
(132,043
|
)
|
(135,823
|
)
|
(148,718
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(689
|
)
|
(8,206
|
)
|
(248
|
)
|
(16,587
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
(13,181
|
)
|
4,802
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
6,647
|
|
(39,445
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Income before taxes
|
322,613
|
|
195,881
|
|
202,827
|
|
235,598
|
|
189,925
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
94,477
|
|
54,922
|
|
67,715
|
|
86,152
|
|
39,213
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income
|
228,136
|
|
140,959
|
|
135,112
|
|
149,446
|
|
150,712
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
1,057
|
|
2,891
|
|
2,841
|
|
7,057
|
|
1,163
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to Levi Strauss & Co.
|
$
|
229,193
|
|
$
|
143,850
|
|
$
|
137,953
|
|
$
|
156,503
|
|
$
|
151,875
|
|
||||
|
Statements of Cash Flow Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net cash flow provided by (used for):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating activities
|
$
|
411,268
|
|
$
|
530,976
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
$
|
146,274
|
|
$
|
388,783
|
|
||||
|
Investing activities
|
(92,798
|
)
|
(75,198
|
)
|
(140,957
|
)
|
(181,781
|
)
|
(233,029
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Financing activities
|
(230,509
|
)
|
(250,939
|
)
|
77,707
|
|
32,313
|
|
(97,155
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
489,258
|
|
$
|
406,134
|
|
$
|
204,542
|
|
$
|
269,726
|
|
$
|
270,804
|
|
||||
|
Working capital
|
1,054,236
|
|
881,493
|
|
870,960
|
|
891,607
|
|
778,888
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total assets
|
3,127,418
|
|
3,170,077
|
|
3,279,555
|
|
3,135,249
|
|
2,989,381
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total debt, excluding capital leases
|
1,545,877
|
|
1,729,211
|
|
1,972,372
|
|
1,863,146
|
|
1,852,900
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total capital leases
|
10,833
|
|
2,022
|
|
3,713
|
|
5,355
|
|
7,365
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Levi Strauss & Co. stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
171,666
|
|
(106,921
|
)
|
(165,592
|
)
|
(219,609
|
)
|
(333,119
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
115,720
|
|
$
|
122,608
|
|
$
|
117,793
|
|
$
|
104,896
|
|
$
|
84,603
|
|
||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
91,771
|
|
83,855
|
|
130,580
|
|
154,632
|
|
82,938
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cash dividends paid
|
25,076
|
|
20,036
|
|
20,023
|
|
20,013
|
|
20,001
|
|
|||||||||
16
|
Item 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Overview
Our Company
We design, market and sell – directly or through third parties and licensees – products that include jeans, casual and dress pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear and related accessories for men, women and children around the world under our Levi’s
®
, Dockers
®
, Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ (“Signature”) and Denizen
®
brands.
Our business is operated through three geographic regions: Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. Our products are sold in approximately
50,000
retail locations in more than
110
countries. We support our brands through a global infrastructure, developing, sourcing and marketing our products around the world. We distribute our Levi’s
®
and Dockers
®
products primarily through chain retailers and department stores in the United States and primarily through department stores, specialty retailers and approximately
2,300
franchised or other brand-dedicated stores and shop-in-shops outside of the United States. We also distribute our Levi’s
®
and Dockers
®
products through
529
company-operated stores located in
33
countries, including the United States, and through the online stores we operate. Our company-operated and online stores generated approximately
22%
of our net revenues in
2013
, as compared to
21%
in the same period in
2012
, with our online stores representing approximately
11%
of this revenue. In addition, we distribute our Levi’s
®
and Dockers
®
products through online stores operated by certain of our key wholesale customers and other third parties. We distribute products under our Signature and Denizen
®
brands primarily through mass channel retailers in the Americas.
Our Europe and Asia Pacific businesses, collectively, contributed approximately
39%
of our net revenues and
36%
of our regional operating income in
2013
. Sales of Levi’s
®
brand products represented approximately
84%
of our total net sales in
2013
. Pants represented approximately
85%
of our total units sold in
2013
, and men's products generated approximately
78%
of our total net sales.
Our Objectives
Our key long-term objectives are to strengthen our brands globally in order to deliver sustainable profitable growth, generate strong cash flow and reduce our debt. Critical strategies to achieve these objectives include driving our profitable core business; expanding the reach of our brands and building a more balanced product portfolio; elevating the performance of our retail channel, including e-commerce; and leveraging our global scale to develop a competitive cost structure.
For 2014, our objective is to grow full-year revenues as compared to 2013. Full-year gross margin in 2014 is projected to be approximately
50%. With respect to our cost structure, we are identifying opportunities to globally streamline processes, eliminate redundant work, take advantage of lower-cost service delivery options and overhaul our procurement practices. This initiative will be implemented in phases as we move through 2014 and will result in up-front charges.
Trends Affecting Our Business
We believe the key business and marketplace factors that we are managing include the following:
|
•
|
Factors that impact consumer discretionary spending, which continues to be weak in certain markets around the world, have created a challenging retail environment for us and our customers, characterized by inconsistent traffic patterns and consequently in part leading to a more promotional environment. Such factors include continuing pressures in the U.S. and international economies related to the lingering high unemployment rates, slow real wage increase, muted growth in emerging markets, a shift in spending to non-apparel categories such as housing and other interest-rate sensitive durables, and other similar macroeconomic elements.
|
|
•
|
Wholesaler/retailer dynamics and wholesale channels remain challenged by slowed growth prospects due to consolidation in the industry, increased competition from vertically-integrated specialty stores, fast-fashion retail, and e-commerce shopping, and pricing transparency enabled by proliferation of online technologies. As a result, many of our customers desire increased returns on their investment with us through increased margins and inventory turns, and they continue to build competitive exclusive or private-label offerings. Many apparel wholesalers, including us, seek to strengthen relationships with customers as a result of these changes in the marketplace through efforts such as investment in new products, marketing programs, fixtures and collaborative planning systems.
|
|
•
|
Many apparel companies that have traditionally relied on wholesale distribution channels have invested in expanding their own retail store and e-commerce distribution and consumer-facing technologies, which has raised competitiveness in the retail market.
|
17
|
•
|
More competitors are seeking growth globally, thereby raising the competitiveness of international markets. Some of these competitors are entering into markets where we already have a mature business such as the United States, Western Europe and Japan, and those new brands may provide consumers discretionary purchase alternatives or lower-priced apparel offerings.
|
|
•
|
Competition for, and price volatility of, resources throughout the supply chain have increased, causing us and other apparel manufacturers to continue to seek alternative sourcing channels and create new efficiencies in our global supply chain. Trends affecting the supply chain include the proliferation of lower-cost sourcing alternatives, resulting in reduced barriers to entry for new competitors, and the impact of fluctuating prices of labor and raw materials. Trends such as these can bring additional pressure on us and other wholesalers and retailers to shorten lead-times, reduce costs and raise product prices.
|
These factors contribute to a global market environment of intense competition, constant product innovation and continuing cost pressure, and combine with the continuing global economic conditions to create a challenging commercial and economic environment. We evaluate these factors as we develop and execute our strategies.
Our
2013
Results
Our
2013
results reflect net revenues and net income growth despite the ongoing challenging conditions in Europe and Asia.
|
•
|
Net revenues.
On both reported and constant-currency bases, consolidated net revenues increased by
2%
compared to
2012
. The increase primarily reflected higher sales in the Americas, both at our company-operated retail network and to certain wholesale customers.
|
|
•
|
Operating income
. Compared to
2012
, operating margin rose to nearly
10%
, primarily due to a higher gross margin, reflecting the benefit from the lower cost of cotton. Consolidated operating income increased by
39%
compared to
2012
, primarily due to charges that we took in the second half of 2012 related to strategic choices in our Asia Pacific region. The increase in operating income was partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") in 2013.
|
|
•
|
Cash flows.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $83 million to
$489 million
while long-term debt decreased $165 million to
$1.5 billion
. Cash flows provided by operating activities were
$411 million
for
2013
as compared to
$531 million
for
2012
, primarily reflecting our higher inventory levels and higher payments to vendors.
|
Financial Information Presentation
Fiscal year
.
Our fiscal year ends on the last Sunday of November in each year, although the fiscal years of certain foreign subsidiaries end on November 30. Each quarter of fiscal years
2013
and
2012
consisted of 13 weeks.
Segments
.
We manage our business according to three regional segments: the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific.
Classification
.
Our classification of certain significant revenues and expenses reflects the following:
|
•
|
Net revenues is primarily comprised of sales of products to wholesale customers, including franchised stores, and direct sales to consumers at our company-operated and online stores and at our company-operated shop-in-shops located within department stores. It includes discounts, allowances for estimated returns and incentives. Net revenues also includes royalties earned from the use of our trademarks by third-party licensees in connection with the manufacturing, advertising and distribution of trademarked products.
|
|
•
|
Cost of goods sold is primarily comprised of product costs, labor and related overhead, inbound freight, internal transfers, and the cost of operating our remaining manufacturing facilities, including the related depreciation expense.
|
|
•
|
Selling costs include, among other things, all occupancy costs and depreciation associated with our company-operated stores and commissions associated with our company-operated shop-in-shops.
|
|
•
|
We reflect substantially all distribution costs in SG&A, including costs related to receiving and inspection at distribution centers, warehousing, shipping to our customers, handling, and certain other activities associated with our distribution network.
|
Gross margins may not be comparable to those of other companies in our industry since some companies may include costs related to their distribution network and occupancy costs associated with company-operated stores in cost of goods sold.
Constant currency
.
Constant-currency comparisons are based on translating local currency amounts in both periods at the foreign exchange rates used in the Company’s internal planning process for the current year. We routinely evaluate our financial
18
performance on a constant-currency basis in order to facilitate period-to-period comparisons without regard to the impact of changing foreign currency exchange rates.
Results of Operations
2013
compared to
2012
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, our consolidated statements of income, the changes in these items from period to period and these items expressed as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
|||||||||||
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
4,681.7
|
|
$
|
4,610.2
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
2,331.2
|
|
2,410.9
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
49.8
|
%
|
52.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
2,350.5
|
|
2,199.3
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
50.2
|
%
|
47.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
1,885.0
|
|
1,865.3
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
40.3
|
%
|
40.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
465.5
|
|
334.0
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
9.9
|
%
|
7.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(129.0
|
)
|
(134.7
|
)
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(0.7
|
)
|
(8.2
|
)
|
(91.6
|
)%
|
—
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
(13.2
|
)
|
4.8
|
|
(374.5
|
)%
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
0.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
322.6
|
|
195.9
|
|
64.7
|
%
|
6.9
|
%
|
4.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
94.5
|
|
54.9
|
|
72.0
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
1.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
228.1
|
|
141.0
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
4.9
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
1.1
|
|
2.9
|
|
(63.4
|
)%
|
—
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to Levi Strauss & Co.
|
$
|
229.2
|
|
$
|
143.9
|
|
59.3
|
%
|
4.9
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
||||
19
Net revenues
The following table presents net revenues by reporting segment for the periods indicated and the changes in net revenues by reporting segment on both reported and constant-currency bases from period to period:
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
% Increase
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
As
Reported
|
Constant
Currency
|
|||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
$
|
2,851.0
|
|
$
|
2,749.3
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
3.7
|
%
|
|||||
|
Europe
|
1,103.5
|
|
1,103.2
|
|
—
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|||||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
727.2
|
|
757.7
|
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
0.4
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
4,681.7
|
|
$
|
4,610.2
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
1.8
|
%
|
|||||
As compared to the same period in the prior year, total net revenues were affected unfavorably by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Americas
.
Net revenues in our Americas region increased on both reported and constant-currency bases.
Net revenues increased in our retail channel at our outlet and online stores primarily due to improved performance. Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
brand wholesale revenues increased due to strong sales to certain key customers. Partially offsetting the higher wholesale revenues was our decision in the third quarter of 2012 to license the Levi's
®
brand boys business, whereby we now recognize a royalty rate on the licensee's sales of these products, in lieu of recognizing the full wholesale revenues and related costs. During the fourth quarter, increased sales of Levi's
®
men's products through all channels offset declines in sales of women's products at wholesale.
Europe
. Net revenues in Europe were flat on a reported basis but decreased on a constant-currency basis, with currency affecting net revenues favorably by approximately
$23 million
.
Net revenues decreased in our traditional wholesale channels throughout the region, most notably during the fourth quarter, and to our franchisees in Southern Europe. This decline was partially offset by net revenue growth from the performance and expansion of our company-operated retail network, particularly at our outlet stores and in Russia.
Asia Pacific
.
Net revenues in Asia Pacific decreased on a reported basis but increased slightly on a constant-currency basis, with currency affecting net revenues unfavorably by approximately
$33 million
.
The increase in constant-currency net revenues reflects our decision to phase out the Denizen
®
brand in the third quarter of 2012. Revenues were negatively impacted in the second half of 2012 due to support we provided to our customers in conjunction with exiting the brand.
Excluding the Denizen
®
impact, net revenues decreased in 2013 reflecting lower Levi's
®
brand sales at our wholesale and retail channels due to ongoing challenging conditions in most markets in the region, which also led to declining franchisee performance and selective closure of unproductive stores. Partially offsetting these declines was a slight improvement in our performance in Levi's
®
brand sales in India.
20
Gross profit
The following table shows consolidated gross profit and gross margin for the periods indicated and the changes in these items from period to period:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
4,681.7
|
|
$
|
4,610.2
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
2,331.2
|
|
2,410.9
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
2,350.5
|
|
$
|
2,199.3
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
50.2
|
%
|
47.7
|
%
|
||||||||
Currency affected gross profit favorably by approximately
$25 million
. Gross margin improved primarily due to the benefit of the lower cost of cotton in the products we sold in the first half of 2013. Gross margin also improved due to the unfavorable impact in 2012 of the $32 million in customer support and markdown charges taken to exit the Denizen
®
brand in Asia Pacific. This was partially offset by a decline in margin in the fourth quarter reflecting higher discounts and inventory markdown, particularly in the women’s business.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The following table shows our SG&A for the periods indicated, the changes in these items from period to period and these items expressed as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
|||||||||||||
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Selling
|
$
|
719.2
|
|
$
|
717.0
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
15.4
|
%
|
15.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Advertising and promotion
|
274.0
|
|
260.4
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
5.9
|
%
|
5.6
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Administration
|
399.8
|
|
376.2
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
8.5
|
%
|
8.2
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Other
|
492.0
|
|
511.7
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
10.5
|
%
|
11.1
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total SG&A
|
$
|
1,885.0
|
|
$
|
1,865.3
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
40.3
|
%
|
40.5
|
%
|
||||||
Currency affected SG&A favorably by approximately
$6 million
as compared to the prior year.
Selling
.
We had
18
more company-operated stores at the end of
2013
than we did at the end of
2012
. Higher expenses associated with the performance and expansion of our company-operated store network were offset by savings in our wholesale sales organization.
Advertising and promotion
.
The increase as a percentage of net revenues reflected increased advertising campaigns in our fourth quarter as compared to the prior-year period.
Administration
.
Incentive compensation expense increased more than $30 million, reflecting improved achievement against our internally-set objectives in
2013
as compared to
2012
; additionally, postretirement benefit plan costs increased, as the favorable impact of past plan amendments had been substantially recognized by the end of fiscal 2012. These increases were partially offset by lower severance expenses in 2013.
Other
.
Other SG&A includes distribution, information resources, and marketing organization costs. Lower costs primarily reflected a third-quarter 2012 impairment charge of
$19 million
recorded in conjunction with our decision to outsource distribution in Japan to a third-party and close our owned distribution center in that country.
21
Operating income
The following table shows operating income by reporting segment and corporate expenses for the periods indicated, the changes in these items from period to period and these items expressed as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Operating income:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
$
|
510.5
|
|
$
|
431.6
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
17.9
|
%
|
15.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Europe
|
167.6
|
|
178.3
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
15.2
|
%
|
16.2
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
123.7
|
|
66.8
|
|
85.1
|
%
|
17.0
|
%
|
8.8
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total regional operating income
|
801.8
|
|
676.7
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
17.1
|
%
|
*
|
14.7
|
%
|
*
|
||||||
|
Corporate expenses
|
336.3
|
|
342.7
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
7.2
|
%
|
*
|
7.4
|
%
|
*
|
||||||
|
Total operating income
|
$
|
465.5
|
|
$
|
334.0
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
9.9
|
%
|
*
|
7.2
|
%
|
*
|
||||
|
Operating margin
|
9.9
|
%
|
7.2
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
______________
* Percentage of consolidated net revenues
Currency favorably affected total operating income by approximately
$31 million
.
Regional operating income
.
|
•
|
Americas.
The increase in operating income and operating margin primarily reflected the region's improved gross margin.
|
|
•
|
Europe.
The decrease in operating income reflected the region's lower net revenues and higher expenses related to our company-operated stores as well as advertising.
|
|
•
|
Asia Pacific.
The increase in operating income and operating margin reflected the charges recorded in 2012 in connection with our decision to phase out the Denizen
®
brand in the region, as well as the region's improved gross margin.
|
Corporate
.
Corporate expenses are SG&A that are not attributed to any of our regional operating segments. As compared to the prior year, corporate expenses in 2013 included lower severance expenses and lower distribution expenses, reflecting the third-quarter 2012 impairment charge of $19 million recorded for our distribution center in Japan. These declines were partially offset by higher incentive compensation expense and higher postretirement benefit plan costs.
Interest expense
Interest expense was
$129.0 million
for the
year ended
November 24, 2013
, as compared to
$134.7 million
in the prior year. The decrease in
2013
was due to lower debt balances, which resulted from our debt refinancing activities during the second quarters of 2012 and 2013, partially offset by higher interest expense on our deferred compensation plans.
The weighted-average interest rate on average borrowings outstanding for the
2013
was
7.52%
, as compared to
7.05%
for
2012
.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
For
the
year ended
November 24, 2013
, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt as a result of our debt refinancing activities during the second quarter of 2013. The loss was comprised of the write-off of the remaining unamortized discount and unamortized debt issuance costs.
22
For the
year ended
November 25, 2012
, we recorded an
$8.2 million
net loss on early extinguishment of debt as a result of our debt refinancing activities during the second quarter of
2012
. The loss was primarily comprised of a tender premium of
$11.4 million
and the write-off of
$4.0 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs, partially offset by a gain of
$7.6 million
related to the partial repurchase of Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016 at a discount to their par value. For more information, see Note
6
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net, primarily consists of foreign exchange management activities and transactions. For the
year ended
November 24, 2013
, we recorded expense of
$13.2 million
as compared to income of
$4.8 million
for the prior year. The expense in
2013
primarily reflected losses on our foreign currency denominated balances. The income in
2012
primarily reflected gains on our foreign currency denominated balances.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was
$94.5 million
for the
year ended
November 24, 2013
, compared to
$54.9 million
for the prior year. Our effective income tax rate was
29.3%
for the
year ended
November 24, 2013
, compared to
28.0%
for the prior year.
The increase in income tax expense in 2013 as compared to 2012 is primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income. The effective tax rate in 2013 reflects a $15.2 million discrete tax benefit attributable to the finalization in July 2013 of the U.S. federal tax audit of tax years 2003 – 2008, and a beneficial change in the impact of foreign operations as compared to 2012. The effective tax rate in
2012
reflected a net tax benefit of
$27.0 million
recognized in
2012
, resulting from a definitive agreement with the State of California on state tax refund claims involving tax years 1986 – 2004.
2012
compared to
2011
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, our consolidated statements of income, the changes in these items from period to period and these items expressed as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
|||||||||||
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
4,610.2
|
|
$
|
4,761.6
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
2,410.9
|
|
2,469.4
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
52.3
|
%
|
51.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
2,199.3
|
|
2,292.2
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
47.7
|
%
|
48.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
1,865.3
|
|
1,955.8
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
40.5
|
%
|
41.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Operating income
|
334.0
|
|
336.4
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
7.2
|
%
|
7.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(134.7
|
)
|
(132.0
|
)
|
2.0
|
%
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(8.2
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
3,208.9
|
%
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
4.8
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
(476.6
|
)%
|
0.1
|
%
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
195.9
|
|
202.8
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
4.2
|
%
|
4.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
54.9
|
|
67.7
|
|
(18.9
|
)%
|
1.2
|
%
|
1.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
141.0
|
|
135.1
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
2.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
2.9
|
|
2.9
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
0.1
|
%
|
0.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to Levi Strauss & Co.
|
$
|
143.9
|
|
$
|
138.0
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
2.9
|
%
|
||||
23
Net revenues
The following table presents net revenues by reporting segment for the periods indicated and the changes in net revenues by reporting segment on both reported and constant-currency bases from period to period:
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
% Increase
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||||
|
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
As
Reported
|
Constant
Currency
|
|||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
$
|
2,749.3
|
|
$
|
2,715.9
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
1.9
|
%
|
|||||
|
Europe
|
1,103.2
|
|
1,174.2
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
1.9
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
757.7
|
|
871.5
|
|
(13.1
|
)%
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
|||||||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
4,610.2
|
|
$
|
4,761.6
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|||||
As compared to the same periods in the prior year, net revenues were affected unfavorably by changes in foreign currency exchange rates across all regions.
Americas
.
On both reported and constant-currency bases, net revenues in our Americas region increased, with currency affecting net revenues unfavorably by approximately $18 million.
Net revenues increased in our retail stores in the region, primarily in the outlet channel, due to the price increases we have implemented and the mix of higher-priced products sold as compared to prior year. At wholesale, net revenues declined in the region, primarily reflecting a decline in Levi's
®
and Dockers
®
brand sales to lower-margin channels, although Levi's
®
brand net revenues benefited from the price increases we have implemented. The decline in wholesale net revenues also reflected our strategic decision to license the Levi's
®
brand boys business beginning in our third quarter, whereby we now recognize a royalty rate on the licensee's sales of these products, in lieu of recognizing the full wholesale revenues and related costs. Sales of our Signature and Denizen
®
brand products increased, reflecting the expansion of product lines at existing customers during the second half of the prior year.
Europe
. Net revenues in Europe declined on a reported basis but increased on a constant-currency basis, with currency affecting net revenues unfavorably by approximately $93 million.
Net revenues of our company-operated retail network grew, reflecting the expansion and improved performance of our stores. Sales in our traditional wholesale channels declined, reflecting the ongoing depressed retail environment, most notably in southern Europe. Higher constant-currency revenues in 2012 also reflected the temporary issues we experienced during the third quarter of 2011 in fulfilling customer orders during the implementation and stabilization of our enterprise resource planning system.
Asia Pacific
.
Net revenues in Asia Pacific declined on both reported and constant-currency bases, with currency affecting net revenues unfavorably by approximately $20 million.
The net revenues decline primarily reflected a drop in wholesale revenues, including franchisees, due to the economic slowdown faced by most markets in the region during the second half of the year, particularly India. Additionally, our decision to phase out the Denizen
®
brand in the region negatively impacted revenues due to support we are providing to our customers.
24
Gross profit
The following table shows consolidated gross profit and gross margin for the periods indicated and the changes in these items from period to period:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||
|
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
4,610.2
|
|
$
|
4,761.6
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
2,410.9
|
|
2,469.4
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
2,199.3
|
|
$
|
2,292.2
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
||||
|
Gross margin
|
47.7
|
%
|
48.1
|
%
|
||||||||
As compared to prior year, the gross profit decline primarily resulted from unfavorable currency effects of approximately $97 million, and, due to our decision to phase out the Denizen
®
brand in Asia Pacific, an unfavorable impact of approximately $32 million inclusive of customer support and the markdown of our remaining inventory in that region. Excluding these factors, gross margin improved due to the increased revenue contribution from our company-operated retail network, the decline in sales to lower-margin channels and the benefit of the lower cost of cotton. Additionally, gross margin benefited from our decision to license the Levi’s
®
brand boys business in our Americas region, as that business generally had a lower gross margin than our other businesses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The following table shows our SG&A for the periods indicated, the changes in these items from period to period and these items expressed as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
|||||||||||||
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Selling
|
$
|
717.0
|
|
$
|
711.1
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
15.6
|
%
|
14.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Advertising and promotion
|
260.4
|
|
313.8
|
|
(17.0
|
)%
|
5.6
|
%
|
6.6
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Administration
|
376.2
|
|
402.3
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
8.2
|
%
|
8.5
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Other
|
511.7
|
|
528.6
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
11.1
|
%
|
11.1
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total SG&A
|
$
|
1,865.3
|
|
$
|
1,955.8
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
40.5
|
%
|
41.1
|
%
|
||||||
Currency contributed approximately $50 million of the decline in SG&A as compared to the prior year.
Selling
.
Currency favorably impacted selling expenses by approximately $22 million as compared to prior year. We had 13 more company-operated stores at the end of 2012 than we did at the end of 2011. Higher selling expenses also reflect severance costs for headcount reductions in our commercial sales organization.
Advertising and promotion
.
The decline in advertising and promotion expenses primarily reflected a reduction of our advertising activities in some markets, and constituted the primary driver of our overall decline in SG&A in 2012. For the fourth quarter of 2012, the increase in advertising and promotion expenses as a percentage of net revenues reflected a difference in the timing of our campaigns as compared to the prior year.
Administration
.
Currency favorably impacted administration expenses by approximately $9 million as compared to prior year. The remaining decline in administration expenses was primarily due to higher separation benefits in 2011 related to the departure of executives.
Other
.
Other SG&A includes distribution, information resources, and marketing organization costs, all of which declined during the year. Currency favorably impacted other SG&A by approximately $10 million. Offsetting these declines was a
$19 million
impairment charge we recorded related to a decision we took in the third quarter to outsource distribution in Japan to a third-party and close our owned distribution center in that country.
25
Operating income
The following table shows operating income by reporting segment and corporate expenses for the periods indicated, the changes in these items from period to period and these items expressed as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
% of Net
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Operating income:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
$
|
431.6
|
|
$
|
393.9
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
15.7
|
%
|
14.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Europe
|
178.3
|
|
182.3
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
16.2
|
%
|
15.5
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
66.8
|
|
108.1
|
|
(38.1
|
)%
|
8.8
|
%
|
12.4
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total regional operating income
|
676.7
|
|
684.3
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
14.7
|
%
|
*
|
14.4
|
%
|
*
|
||||||
|
Corporate expenses
|
342.7
|
|
347.9
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
7.4
|
%
|
*
|
7.3
|
%
|
*
|
||||||
|
Total operating income
|
$
|
334.0
|
|
$
|
336.4
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
7.2
|
%
|
*
|
7.1
|
%
|
*
|
||||
|
Operating margin
|
7.2
|
%
|
7.1
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
______________
* Percentage of consolidated net revenues
Currency unfavorably affected total operating income by approximately $47 million.
Regional operating income
.
|
•
|
Americas.
The increase in operating income and operating margin reflected the region's improved gross margin.
|
|
•
|
Europe.
Excluding unfavorable currency effects, operating income increased, reflecting the region's lower advertising and promotion expenses.
|
|
•
|
Asia Pacific.
The decline in operating income and operating margin primarily reflected our decision to phase out the Denizen
®
brand in the region, as well as the region's lower net revenues.
|
Corporate
.
Corporate expenses are selling, general and administrative expenses that are not attributed to any of our regional operating segments. Corporate expenses in 2012 reflect the $19 million impairment charge recorded for our distribution center in Japan and include severance charges for headcount reductions across the organization primarily during the second half of the year; corporate expenses in 2011 included higher separation benefits related to the departure of executives.
Corporate expenses in 2012 and 2011 include amortization of prior service benefit of $16.4 million and $28.9 million, respectively, related to postretirement benefit plan amendments in 2004 and 2003. For more information, see Note 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Interest expense
Interest expense was $134.7 million for the year ended
November 25, 2012
, as compared to $132.0 million in the prior year. The increase in 2012 was due to higher interest expense on our deferred compensation plans, partially offset by a decline in interest expense resulting from our second quarter 2012 debt refinancing activity.
The weighted-average interest rate on average borrowings outstanding for the 2012 was 7.05%, as compared to 6.90% for 2011.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
For the year ended
November 25, 2012
, we recorded an $8.2 million net loss on early extinguishment of debt as a result of our debt refinancing activities during the second quarter of 2012. The loss was primarily comprised of a tender premium of $11.4 million and the write-off of $4.0 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, partially offset by a gain of $7.6 million related to the partial repurchase of Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016 at a discount to their par value. For more information, see Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
26
Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net, primarily consists of foreign exchange management activities and transactions. For the year ended
November 25, 2012
, we recorded income of $4.8 million as compared to expense of $1.3 million for the prior year. The income in 2012 primarily reflected gains on our foreign currency denominated balances. The net expense in 2011 primarily reflected losses on our foreign currency denominated balances.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was $54.9 million for the year ended
November 25, 2012
, compared to $67.7 million for the prior year. Our effective income tax rate was 28.0% for the year ended
November 25, 2012
, compared to 33.4% for the prior year.
The reduction in our income tax expense and effective income tax rate in 2012 was primarily due to a net tax benefit of $27.0 million recognized in 2012, resulting from a definitive agreement with the State of California on state tax refund claims involving tax years 1986 – 2004, partially offset by a $9.1 million write-off of domestic deferred tax assets and an unfavorable shift in the mix of foreign earnings to jurisdictions with higher effective tax rates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity outlook
We believe we will have adequate liquidity over the next twelve months to operate our business and to meet our cash requirements.
Cash sources
We are a privately-held corporation. We have historically relied primarily on cash flows from operations, borrowings under credit facilities, issuances of notes and other forms of debt financing. We regularly explore financing and debt reduction alternatives, including new credit agreements, unsecured and secured note issuances, equity financing, equipment and real estate financing, securitizations and asset sales. Key sources of cash include earnings from operations and borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility.
We are borrowers under a senior secured revolving credit facility. The facility is an asset-based facility, in which the borrowing availability is primarily based on the value of our U.S. Levi’s
®
trademarks and the levels of accounts receivable and inventory in the United States and Canada. The maximum availability under the facility is $850 million, of which $800 million is available to us for revolving loans in U.S. Dollars and $50 million is available to us for revolving loans either in U.S. Dollars or Canadian Dollars.
As of
November 24, 2013
, we had no borrowings under the facility, and unused availability under the facility was
$635.3 million
, as our total availability of
$701.5 million
, based on collateral levels as defined by the agreement, was reduced by
$66.2 million
of other credit-related instruments.
As of
November 24, 2013
, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately
$489.3 million
, resulting in a total liquidity position (unused availability and cash and cash equivalents) of
$1.1 billion
.
Cash uses
Our principal cash requirements include working capital, capital expenditures, payments of principal and interest on our debt, payments of taxes, contributions to our pension plans and payments for postretirement health benefit plans, settlement of shares issued under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“EIP”) and, if market conditions warrant, occasional investments in, or acquisitions of, business ventures in our line of business. In addition, we regularly evaluate our ability to pay dividends or repurchase stock, all consistent with the terms of our debt agreements.
27
The following table presents selected cash uses in
2013
and the related projected cash uses for these items in
2014
as of
November 24, 2013
:
|
Cash Used in
|
Projected
Cash Uses in
|
|||||||||
|
2013
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
||||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
(1)
|
$
|
92
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
||||
|
Interest
|
122
|
|
114
|
|
||||||
|
Federal, foreign and state taxes (net of refunds)
|
47
|
|
67
|
|
||||||
|
Pension plans
(2)
|
36
|
|
19
|
|
||||||
|
Postretirement health benefit plans
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
||||||
|
Dividend
(3)
|
25
|
|
30
|
|
||||||
|
Total selected cash requirements
|
$
|
337
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
||||
______________
|
(1)
|
Capital expenditures consist primarily of costs associated with information technology systems and investment in company-operated retail stores.
|
|
(2)
|
The
2014
pension contribution amounts will be recalculated at the end of the plans' fiscal years, which for our U.S. pension plan is at the beginning of the Company's third fiscal quarter. Accordingly, actual contributions may differ materially from those presented here, based on factors such as changes in discount rates and the valuation of pension assets.
|
|
(3)
|
Subsequent to the fiscal year-end, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of approximately $30 million.
|
28
The following table provides information about our significant cash contractual obligations and commitments as of
November 24, 2013
:
|
Payments due or projected by period
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Thereafter
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contractual and Long-term Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term and long-term debt obligations
|
$
|
1,546
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
||||||
|
Interest
(1)
|
720
|
|
114
|
|
112
|
|
111
|
|
106
|
|
91
|
|
186
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
39
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
19
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Operating leases
(2)
|
649
|
|
155
|
|
123
|
|
97
|
|
77
|
|
60
|
|
137
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Purchase obligations
(3)
|
832
|
|
561
|
|
48
|
|
19
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
184
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Postretirement obligations
(4)
|
135
|
|
16
|
|
15
|
|
15
|
|
14
|
|
14
|
|
61
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Pension obligations
(5)
|
330
|
|
19
|
|
38
|
|
41
|
|
46
|
|
48
|
|
138
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Long-term employee related benefits
(6)
|
87
|
|
15
|
|
10
|
|
14
|
|
8
|
|
7
|
|
33
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
4,338
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
$
|
1,818
|
|
||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
Interest obligations are computed using constant interest rates until maturity.
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts reflect contractual obligations relating to our existing leased facilities as of
November 24, 2013
, and therefore do not reflect our planned future openings of company-operated retail stores. For more information, see “Item 2 – Properties.”
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts reflect estimated commitments of
$501 million
for inventory purchases,
$101 million
for human resources, advertising, information technology and other professional services. In May 2013, we entered into an agreement for sponsorship, naming rights and related benefits with respect to the Levi's
®
Stadium in Santa Clara, California, future home of the San Francisco 49ers. The term of the agreement is 20 years, over which we will make payments on a semi-annual basis.
|
|
(4)
|
The amounts presented in the table represent an estimate for the next ten years of our projected payments, based on information provided by our plans' actuaries, and have not been reduced by estimated Medicare subsidy receipts, the amounts of which are not material. Our policy is to fund postretirement benefits as claims and premiums are paid. For more information, see Note
8
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
|
|
(5)
|
The amounts presented in the table represent an estimate of our projected contributions to the plans for the next ten years based on information provided by our plans' actuaries. For U.S. qualified plans, these estimates comply with minimum funded status and minimum required contributions under the Pension Protection Act. The
2014
contribution amounts will be recalculated at the end of the plans' fiscal years, which for our U.S. pension plan is at the beginning of the Company's third fiscal quarter. Accordingly, actual contributions may differ materially from those presented here, based on factors such as changes in discount rates and the valuation of pension assets. For more information, see Note
8
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
|
|
(6)
|
Long-term employee-related benefits relate to the current and non-current portion of deferred compensation arrangements and workers' compensation. We estimated these payments based on prior experience and forecasted activity for these items. For more information, see Note
12
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
|
This table does not include amounts related to our uncertain tax positions of
$37.8 million
. We do not anticipate a material effect on our liquidity as a result of payments in future periods of liabilities for uncertain tax positions. The table also does not include amounts related to potential cash settlement of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) put to the Company under the terms of our EIP. Such payments may range up to $35 million in 2014 and $45 million thereafter, based on the number of shares exercisable and shares expected to vest, respectively, and the fair value of the Company's stock price as of November 24, 2013.
Information in the two preceding tables reflects our estimates of future cash payments. These estimates and projections are based upon assumptions that are inherently subject to significant economic, competitive, legislative and other uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, our actual expenditures and liabilities may be materially higher or lower than the estimates and projections reflected in these tables. The inclusion of these projections and estimates should not be regarded as a representation by us that the estimates will prove to be correct.
29
Cash flows
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
411.3
|
|
$
|
531.0
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
||||
|
Cash used for investing activities
|
(92.8
|
)
|
(75.2
|
)
|
(141.0
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Cash (used for) provided by financing activities
|
(230.5
|
)
|
(250.9
|
)
|
77.7
|
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
489.3
|
|
406.1
|
|
204.5
|
|
|||||||
2013
as compared to
2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities was
$411.3 million
for
2013
, as compared to
$531.0 million
for
2012
. Cash provided by operating activities decreased compared to the prior year due to an increase in cash used for inventory, reflecting our higher inventory build, and higher payments to vendors, reflecting our higher SG&A.
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash used for investing activities was
$92.8 million
for
2013
, as compared to
$75.2 million
for
2012
. The increase in cash used for investing activities as compared to the prior year primarily reflects higher spend on facilities improvements and our company-operated retail stores, partially offset by lower cash used toward information technology projects.
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash used for financing activities was
$230.5 million
for
2013
, as compared to
$250.9 million
for
2012
. Cash used in both periods primarily related to our refinancing activities and debt reduction in each year.
2012
as compared to
2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $531.0 million for
2012
, as compared to $1.8 million for
2011
. Cash provided by operating activities increased compared to the prior year due to less cash used for inventory, reflecting the lower cost of cotton and a reduction in our inventory levels, and a decline in payments to vendors, reflecting our lower SG&A. Also, cash received from customers increased, reflecting our higher beginning accounts receivable balance.
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash used for investing activities was $75.2 million for
2012
, as compared to $141.0 million for
2011
. The reduction in cash used for investing activities as compared to the prior year primarily reflects the higher information technology costs in 2011 associated with the installation of our global enterprise resource planning system.
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash used by financing activities was $250.9 million for
2012
, as compared to cash provided of $77.7 million for
2011
. Net cash used in 2012 and net cash provided in 2011 primarily related to net repayments and proceeds, respectively, of our senior revolving credit facility. Cash used in both years include dividend payments to stockholders of $20.0 million.
Indebtedness
The borrower of substantially all of our debt is Levi Strauss & Co., the parent and U.S. operating company. Substantially all of our debt as of
November 24, 2013
, was fixed-rate. As of
November 24, 2013
, our required aggregate debt principal payments on our unsecured long-term debt were
$39.5 million
in 2016,
$404.4 million
in 2018 and the remaining
$1.1 billion
in years after 2018. Short-term borrowings of
$41.9 million
at various foreign subsidiaries were expected to be either paid over the next twelve months or refinanced at the end of their applicable terms.
Our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants restricting our activities as well as those of our subsidiaries. As of
November 24, 2013
, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.
30
Effects of Inflation
We believe that inflation in the regions where most of our sales occur has not had a significant effect on our net revenues or profitability.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Guarantees and Other Contingent Obligations
Off-balance sheet arrangements and other
.
We have contractual commitments for non-cancelable operating leases; for more information, see Note
13
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report. We participate in a multiemployer pension plan; however, our exposure to risks arising from participation in the plan and the extent to which we can be liable to the plan for other participating employers' obligations are not material. We have no other material non-cancelable guarantees or commitments, and no material special-purpose entities or other off-balance sheet debt obligations.
Indemnification agreements
.
In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into agreements containing indemnification provisions under which we agree to indemnify the other party for specified claims and losses. For example, our trademark license agreements, real estate leases, consulting agreements, logistics outsourcing agreements, securities purchase agreements and credit agreements typically contain these provisions. This type of indemnification provision obligates us to pay certain amounts associated with claims brought against the other party as the result of trademark infringement, negligence or willful misconduct of our employees, breach of contract by us including inaccuracy of representations and warranties, specified lawsuits in which we and the other party are co-defendants, product claims and other matters. These amounts are generally not readily quantifiable: the maximum possible liability or amount of potential payments that could arise out of an indemnification claim depends entirely on the specific facts and circumstances associated with the claim. We have insurance coverage that minimizes the potential exposure to certain of these claims. We also believe that the likelihood of substantial payment obligations under these agreements to third parties is low and that any such amounts would be immaterial.
Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management's most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Changes in such estimates, based on newly available information, or different assumptions or conditions, may affect amounts reported in future periods.
We summarize our critical accounting policies below.
Revenue recognition
.
Net sales is primarily comprised of sales of products to wholesale customers, including franchised stores, and direct sales to consumers at our company-operated and online stores and at our company-operated shop-in-shops located within department stores. We recognize revenue on sale of product when the goods are shipped or delivered and title to the goods passes to the customer provided that: there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recorded net of an allowance for estimated returns, discounts and retailer promotions and other similar incentives. Licensing revenues from the use of our trademarks in connection with the manufacturing, advertising, and distribution of trademarked products by third-party licensees are earned and recognized as products are sold by licensees based on royalty rates as set forth in the licensing agreements.
We recognize allowances for estimated returns in the period in which the related sale is recorded. We recognize allowances for estimated discounts, retailer promotions and other similar incentives at the later of the period in which the related sale is recorded or the period in which the sales incentive is offered to the customer. We estimate non-volume based allowances based on historical rates as well as customer and product-specific circumstances. Actual allowances may differ from estimates due to changes in sales volume based on retailer or consumer demand and changes in customer and product-specific circumstances. Sales and value-added taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Inventory valuation
.
We value inventories at the lower of cost or market value. Inventory cost is generally determined using the first-in first-out method. We include product costs, labor and related overhead, sourcing costs, inbound freight, internal transfers, and the cost of operating our remaining manufacturing facilities, including the related depreciation expense, in the cost of inventories. We estimate quantities of slow-moving and obsolete inventory by reviewing on-hand quantities, outstanding purchase obligations and forecasted sales. In determining inventory market values, substantial consideration is given to the expected product selling price. We estimate expected selling prices based on our historical recovery rates for sale of slow-moving and obsolete inventory and other factors, such as market conditions, expected channel of disposition, and current consumer preferences. Estimates
31
may differ from actual results due to changes in resale or market value, avenues of disposition, consumer and retailer preferences and economic conditions.
Impairment
.
We review our goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, or more frequently as warranted by events or changes in circumstances which indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We qualitatively assess goodwill impairment for certain reporting units and impairment for other non-amortized intangible assets to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or other non-amortized intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. The reporting units and non-amortized intangibles selected for the qualitative assessment approach have fair values that are significantly higher than their carrying values and remote risk of impairment. For goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets not qualitatively assessed, a two-step quantitative approach is utilized. In the first step, we compare the carrying value of the reporting unit or applicable asset to its fair value, which we estimate using a discounted cash flow analysis or by comparison to the market values of similar assets. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit or asset exceeds its estimated fair value, we perform the second step, and determine the impairment loss, if any, as the excess of the carrying value of the goodwill or intangible asset over its fair value. The assumptions used in such valuations are subject to volatility and may differ from actual results; however, based on the carrying value of our goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets as of
November 24, 2013
, relative to their estimated fair values, we do not anticipate any material impairment charges in the near-term.
We review our other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of an other long-lived asset exceeds the expected future undiscounted cash flows, we measure and record an impairment loss for the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.
To determine the fair value of impaired assets, we utilize the valuation technique or techniques deemed most appropriate based on the nature of the impaired asset and the data available, which may include the use of quoted market prices, prices for similar assets or other valuation techniques such as discounted future cash flows or earnings.
Income tax assets and liabilities
.
The future effective tax rate will ultimately depend on the mix of earnings between domestic and foreign operations, management assertion on whether certain foreign earnings will be indefinitely reinvested, changes in tax laws and regulations and potential resolutions on tax examinations, refund claims and litigation. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise from examinations in various jurisdictions and assumptions and estimates used in evaluating the need for valuation allowance.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We compute our provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income for the years in which those tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. Significant judgments are required in order to determine the realizability of these deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we evaluate all significant available positive and negative evidence, including historical operating results, estimates of future taxable income and the existence of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Changes in the expectations regarding the realization of deferred tax assets could materially impact income tax expense in future periods.
We continuously review issues raised in connection with all ongoing examinations and open tax years to evaluate the adequacy of our tax liabilities. We evaluate uncertain tax positions under a two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the uncertain tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination based on its technical merits. The second step is, for those positions that meet the recognition criteria, to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than fifty percent likely of being realized. We believe our recorded tax liabilities are adequate to cover all open tax years based on our assessment. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions and involves significant judgments about future events. To the extent that our view as to the outcome of these matters changes, we will adjust income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. We classify interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense.
Employee benefits and incentive compensation
Pension and postretirement benefits.
We have several non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans covering eligible employees. We also provide certain health care benefits for U.S. employees who meet age, participation and length of service requirements at retirement. In addition, we sponsor other retirement or post-employment plans for our foreign employees in accordance with local government programs and requirements. We retain the right to amend, curtail or discontinue any aspect of the plans, subject to local regulations. Any of these actions, either individually or in combination, could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and on our future financial performance.
32
We recognize either an asset or liability for any plan's funded status in our consolidated balance sheets. We measure changes in funded status using actuarial models which utilize an attribution approach that generally spreads individual events either over the estimated service lives of the remaining employees in the plan, or, for plans where participants will not earn additional benefits by rendering future service, over the plan participants' estimated remaining lives. The attribution approach assumes that employees render service over their service lives on a relatively smooth basis and as such, presumes that the income statement effects of pension or postretirement benefit plans should follow the same pattern. Our policy is to fund our pension plans based upon actuarial recommendations and in accordance with applicable laws, income tax regulations and credit agreements.
Net pension and postretirement benefit income or expense is generally determined using assumptions which include expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, compensation rate increases and medical trend rates. We use a mix of actual historical rates, expected rates and external data to determine the assumptions used in the actuarial models. For example, we utilized a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high-quality corporate bonds with various maturities to determine the appropriate discount rate to use for our U.S. benefit plans. Under this model, each year's expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate. We utilized country-specific third-party bond indices to determine appropriate discount rates to use for benefit plans of our foreign subsidiaries. Changes in actuarial assumptions and estimates, either individually or in combination, could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and on our future financial performance. For example, as of
November 24, 2013
, a twenty-five basis-point change in the discount rate would yield an approximately three-percent change in the projected benefit obligation and annual service cost of our pension and postretirement benefit plans.
Employee incentive compensation.
We maintain short-term and long-term employee incentive compensation plans. For our short-term plans, the amount of the cash bonus earned depends upon business unit and corporate financial results as measured against pre-established targets, and also depends upon the performance and job level of the individual. Our long-term plans are intended to reward certain levels of management for its long-term impact on our total earnings performance. Performance is measured at the end of a three-year period based on our performance over the period measured against certain pre-established targets such as the compound annual growth rates over the periods for net revenues and average margin of net earnings adjusted for certain items such as interest and taxes. We accrue the related compensation expense over the period of the plan, and changes in our projected future financial performance could have a material impact on our accruals.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report for recently issued accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and expected impact to our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters discussed in this report, including (without limitation) statements under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contain forward-looking statements. Although we believe that, in making any such statements, our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such statement may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected.
These forward-looking statements include statements relating to our anticipated financial performance and business prospects and/or statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”, “expect”, “project”, “could”, “plans”, “seeks” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date stated and we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, even if experience or future events make it clear that any expected results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements will not be realized. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these expectations may not prove to be correct or we may not achieve the financial results, savings or other benefits anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of our senior management and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which may be beyond our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements and include, without limitation:
|
•
|
changes in general economic and financial conditions, and the resulting impact on the level of consumer spending for apparel and pricing trend fluctuations, and our ability to plan for and respond to the impact of those changes;
|
|
•
|
consequences of impacts to the businesses of our wholesale customers caused by factors such as decreased consumer spending, pricing fluctuations, general economic and financial conditions and changing consumer preferences;
|
|
•
|
our and our wholesale customers’ decisions to modify strategies and adjust product mix and pricing, and our ability to manage any resulting product transition costs;
|
33
|
•
|
our effectiveness in increasing productivity and efficiency in our operations and our ability to implement organizational and distribution changes intended to optimize operations without business disruption or mitigation to such disruptions;
|
|
•
|
availability of quality raw materials and our ability to mitigate the variability of costs related to manufacturing, sourcing, and raw materials supply and to manage consumer response to such mitigating actions;
|
|
•
|
our ability to gauge and adapt to changing U.S. and international retail environments and fashion trends and changing consumer preferences in product, price-points, as well as in-store and online shopping experiences;
|
|
•
|
our ability to respond to price, innovation and other competitive pressures in the apparel industry, on and from our key customers and in our key markets;
|
|
•
|
our ability to increase the number of dedicated stores for our products, including through opening and profitably operating company-operated stores;
|
|
•
|
consequences of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
•
|
the impact of the variables that affect the net periodic benefit cost and future funding requirements of our postretirement benefits and pension plans;
|
|
•
|
our dependence on key distribution channels, customers and suppliers;
|
|
•
|
our ability to utilize our tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards;
|
|
•
|
ongoing or future litigation matters and disputes and regulatory developments;
|
|
•
|
changes in or application of trade and tax laws; and
|
|
•
|
political, social and economic instability in countries where we and our customers do business.
|
Our actual results might differ materially from historical performance or current expectations. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
34
|
Item 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Investment and Credit Availability Risk
We manage cash and cash equivalents in various institutions at levels beyond FDIC coverage limits, and we purchase investments not guaranteed by the FDIC. Accordingly, there may be a risk that we will not recover the full principal of our investments or that their liquidity may be diminished. To mitigate this risk, our investment policy emphasizes preservation of principal and liquidity.
Multiple financial institutions are committed to provide loans and other credit instruments under our secured revolving credit facility. There may be a risk that some of these institutions cannot deliver against these obligations in a timely manner, or at all.
Foreign Exchange Risk
The global scope of our business operations exposes us to the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency markets. This exposure is the result of certain product sourcing activities, some intercompany sales, foreign subsidiaries' royalty payments, interest payments, earnings repatriations, net investment in foreign operations and funding activities. Our foreign currency management objective is to minimize the effect of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on nonfunctional currency cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries and selected assets or liabilities of the Company and its subsidiaries without exposing the Company to additional risk associated with transactions that could be regarded as speculative.
We use a centralized currency management operation to take advantage of potential opportunities to naturally offset exposures against each other. For any residual exposures under management, we may enter into various financial instruments including forward exchange contracts to hedge certain forecasted transactions as well as certain firm commitments, including third-party and intercompany transactions.
Our foreign exchange risk management activities are governed by a foreign exchange risk management policy approved by our Treasury committee. Members of our Treasury committee, comprised of a group of our senior financial executives, review our foreign exchange activities to monitor compliance with our policies. The operating policies and guidelines outlined in the foreign exchange risk management policy provide a framework that allows for a managed approach to the management of currency exposures while ensuring the activities are conducted within established parameters. Our policy includes guidelines for the organizational structure of our treasury risk management function and for internal controls over foreign exchange risk management activities, including various measurements for monitoring compliance. We monitor foreign exchange risk and related derivatives using different techniques including a review of market value, sensitivity analysis and a value-at-risk model. We use the market approach to estimate the fair value of our foreign exchange derivative contracts.
We use derivative instruments to manage certain but not all exposures to foreign currencies. Our approach to managing foreign currency exposures is consistent with that applied in previous years. As of
November 24, 2013
, we had forward foreign exchange contracts to buy
$519.5 million
and to sell
$233.9 million
against various foreign currencies. These contracts are at various exchange rates and expire at various dates through
January 2015
.
As of
November 25, 2012
, we had forward foreign exchange contracts to buy $795.1 million and to sell $422.3 million against various foreign currencies. These contracts were at various exchange rates and expired at various dates through January 2014.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to market risk primarily related to foreign currencies. We manage foreign currency risks with the objective to minimize the effect of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on nonfunctional currency cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries and selected assets or liabilities of the Company and its subsidiaries without exposing the Company to additional risk associated with transactions that could be regarded as speculative.
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the over-the-counter forward foreign exchange contracts. However, we believe that our exposures are appropriately diversified across counterparties and that these counterparties are creditworthy financial institutions. We monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties in accordance with our foreign exchange and investment policies. In addition, we have International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) master agreements in place with our counterparties to mitigate the credit risk related to the outstanding derivatives. These agreements provide the legal basis for over-the-counter transactions in many of the world's commodity and financial markets.
35
The following table presents the currency, average forward exchange rate, notional amount and fair values for our outstanding forward contracts as of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
. The average forward exchange rate is the weighted average of the forward rates of the contracts for the indicated currency. The notional amount represents the U.S. Dollar equivalent amount of the foreign currency at the inception of the contracts, and is the net sum of all buy and sell transactions for the indicated currency. A net positive notional amount represents a position to buy the U.S. Dollar versus the exposure currency, while a net negative notional amount represents a position to sell the U.S. Dollar versus the exposure currency. All transactions will mature before the end of
January 2015
.
|
As of November 24, 2013
|
As of November 25, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average Forward Exchange Rate
|
Notional Amount
|
Fair Value
|
Average Forward Exchange Rate
|
Notional Amount
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currency
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Australian Dollar
|
0.95
|
|
$
|
23,954
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
1.02
|
|
$
|
41,316
|
|
$
|
(558
|
)
|
|||||
|
Brazilian Real
|
2.53
|
|
7,526
|
|
(417
|
)
|
2.08
|
|
16,339
|
|
746
|
|
|||||||||
|
Canadian Dollar
|
1.04
|
|
22,506
|
|
449
|
|
1.01
|
|
21,376
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Swiss Franc
|
0.89
|
|
973
|
|
18
|
|
0.94
|
|
3,218
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Czech Koruna
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
19.26
|
|
2,786
|
|
43
|
|
|||||||||
|
Danish Krone
|
5.41
|
|
(555
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
5.75
|
|
(565
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Euro
|
1.36
|
|
77,318
|
|
445
|
|
1.29
|
|
70,697
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
British Pound Sterling
|
1.61
|
|
(31,148
|
)
|
45
|
|
1.60
|
|
(10,106
|
)
|
(45
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Hong Kong Dollar
|
7.75
|
|
878
|
|
(1
|
)
|
7.75
|
|
(2,707
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Hungarian Forint
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
223.06
|
|
(7,150
|
)
|
135
|
|
|||||||||
|
Indonesian Rupiah
|
11,769.10
|
|
12,689
|
|
261
|
|
9,838.63
|
|
11,919
|
|
1
|
|
|||||||||
|
Indian Rupee
|
69.40
|
|
5,905
|
|
(348
|
)
|
56.30
|
|
15,985
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Japanese Yen
|
94.48
|
|
35,668
|
|
2,356
|
|
79.08
|
|
30,894
|
|
1,229
|
|
|||||||||
|
South Korean Won
|
1,102.82
|
|
21,329
|
|
(968
|
)
|
1,129.48
|
|
26,464
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Mexican Peso
|
13.20
|
|
54,199
|
|
11
|
|
13.54
|
|
81,269
|
|
(2,020
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Malaysian Ringgit
|
3.24
|
|
18,231
|
|
(18
|
)
|
3.11
|
|
14,730
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Norwegian Krone
|
6.03
|
|
1,827
|
|
(7
|
)
|
5.76
|
|
(161
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
New Zealand Dollar
|
0.82
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
(25
|
)
|
0.82
|
|
(11,702
|
)
|
(33
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Philippine Peso
|
43.47
|
|
10,321
|
|
53
|
|
42.08
|
|
6,986
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Polish Zloty
|
3.08
|
|
(3,325
|
)
|
(198
|
)
|
3.25
|
|
1,475
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Russian Ruble
|
32.41
|
|
3,165
|
|
119
|
|
31.26
|
|
6,719
|
|
56
|
|
|||||||||
|
Swedish Krona
|
6.54
|
|
1,647
|
|
2
|
|
6.70
|
|
(152
|
)
|
392
|
|
|||||||||
|
Singapore Dollar
|
1.24
|
|
256
|
|
2
|
|
1.22
|
|
396
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Turkish Lira
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1.82
|
|
12,293
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
New Taiwan Dollar
|
29.63
|
|
7,708
|
|
(9
|
)
|
29.28
|
|
16,730
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
South African Rand
|
10.44
|
|
17,200
|
|
(58
|
)
|
8.80
|
|
23,780
|
|
1,091
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
285,637
|
|
$
|
2,746
|
|
$
|
372,829
|
|
$
|
(2,176
|
)
|
|||||||||
36
Interest rate risk
The following table provides information about our financial instruments that may be sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal (face amount) outstanding balances of our debt instruments and the related weighted-average interest rates for the years indicated based on expected maturity dates. All amounts are stated in U.S. Dollar equivalents.
|
As of November 24, 2013
|
As of November 25, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expected Maturity Date
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Debt Instruments
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed Rate (US$)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
$
|
910,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Average Interest Rate
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
7.25
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed Rate (Yen 4.0 billion)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
39,545
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
39,545
|
|
48,508
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Average Interest Rate
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed Rate (Euro 300 million)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
404,430
|
|
—
|
|
404,430
|
|
386,520
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Average Interest Rate
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
—
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Variable Rate (US$)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
325,000
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Average Interest Rate
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Total Principal (face amount) of our debt instruments
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
39,545
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
404,430
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
$
|
1,493,975
|
|
$
|
1,670,028
|
|
|||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
Amounts presented in this table exclude our other short-term borrowings of
$41.9 million
as of
November 24, 2013
, consisting of term loans and revolving credit facilities at various foreign subsidiaries which we expect to either pay over the next twelve months or refinance at the end of their applicable terms. All of the
$41.9 million
was fixed-rate debt.
|
37
|
Item 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Levi Strauss & Co.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity (deficit), and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Levi Strauss & Co. and its subsidiaries at
November 24, 2013
and
November 25, 2012
, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
November 24, 2013
, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Francisco, CA
February 11, 2014
38
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
|||||||
|
Current Assets:
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
489,258
|
|
$
|
406,134
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $18,264 and $20,738
|
446,671
|
|
500,672
|
|
|||
|
Inventories:
|
|||||||
|
Raw materials
|
3,361
|
|
5,312
|
|
|||
|
Work-in-process
|
6,597
|
|
9,558
|
|
|||
|
Finished goods
|
593,909
|
|
503,990
|
|
|||
|
Total inventories
|
603,867
|
|
518,860
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
187,836
|
|
116,224
|
|
|||
|
Other current assets
|
112,082
|
|
136,483
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
1,839,714
|
|
1,678,373
|
|
|||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $775,933 and $782,766
|
439,861
|
|
458,807
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
241,228
|
|
239,971
|
|
|||
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
49,149
|
|
59,909
|
|
|||
|
Non-current deferred tax assets, net
|
448,839
|
|
612,916
|
|
|||
|
Other non-current assets
|
108,627
|
|
120,101
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,127,418
|
|
$
|
3,170,077
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|||||||
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Short-term debt
|
$
|
41,861
|
|
$
|
59,759
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of capital leases
|
590
|
|
1,760
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
254,516
|
|
225,726
|
|
|||
|
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits
|
209,966
|
|
223,850
|
|
|||
|
Accrued interest payable
|
5,346
|
|
5,471
|
|
|||
|
Accrued income taxes
|
11,301
|
|
16,739
|
|
|||
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
261,898
|
|
263,575
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
785,478
|
|
796,880
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt
|
1,504,016
|
|
1,669,452
|
|
|||
|
Long-term capital leases
|
10,243
|
|
262
|
|
|||
|
Postretirement medical benefits
|
122,248
|
|
140,958
|
|
|||
|
Pension liability
|
326,767
|
|
492,396
|
|
|||
|
Long-term employee related benefits
|
73,386
|
|
62,529
|
|
|||
|
Long-term income tax liabilities
|
30,683
|
|
40,356
|
|
|||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
61,097
|
|
60,869
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities
|
2,913,918
|
|
3,263,702
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Temporary equity
|
38,524
|
|
7,883
|
|
|||
|
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit):
|
|||||||
|
Levi Strauss & Co. stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|||||||
|
Common stock — $.01 par value; 270,000,000 shares authorized; 37,446,087 shares and 37,392,343 shares issued and outstanding
|
374
|
|
374
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
7,361
|
|
33,365
|
|
|||
|
Retained earnings
|
475,960
|
|
273,975
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(312,029
|
)
|
(414,635
|
)
|
|||
|
Total Levi Strauss & Co. stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
171,666
|
|
(106,921
|
)
|
|||
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
3,310
|
|
5,413
|
|
|||
|
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
174,976
|
|
(101,508
|
)
|
|||
|
Total liabilities, temporary equity and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$
|
3,127,418
|
|
$
|
3,170,077
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
39
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
4,681,691
|
|
$
|
4,610,193
|
|
$
|
4,761,566
|
|
||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
2,331,219
|
|
2,410,862
|
|
2,469,327
|
|
|||||
|
Gross profit
|
2,350,472
|
|
2,199,331
|
|
2,292,239
|
|
|||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
1,884,965
|
|
1,865,352
|
|
1,955,846
|
|
|||||
|
Operating income
|
465,507
|
|
333,979
|
|
336,393
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
(129,024
|
)
|
(134,694
|
)
|
(132,043
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(689
|
)
|
(8,206
|
)
|
(248
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
(13,181
|
)
|
4,802
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
322,613
|
|
195,881
|
|
202,827
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense
|
94,477
|
|
54,922
|
|
67,715
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
228,136
|
|
140,959
|
|
135,112
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
1,057
|
|
2,891
|
|
2,841
|
|
|||||
|
Net income attributable to Levi Strauss & Co.
|
$
|
229,193
|
|
$
|
143,850
|
|
$
|
137,953
|
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
40
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
228,136
|
|
$
|
140,959
|
|
$
|
135,112
|
|
||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of related income taxes:
|
|||||||||||
|
Pension and postretirement benefits
|
104,189
|
|
(75,277
|
)
|
(56,877
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net investment hedge (losses) gains
|
(7,846
|
)
|
9,840
|
|
(2,304
|
)
|
|||||
|
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)
|
4,965
|
|
(5,214
|
)
|
(13,155
|
)
|
|||||
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
|
252
|
|
1,561
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
101,560
|
|
(69,090
|
)
|
(73,040
|
)
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
329,696
|
|
71,869
|
|
62,072
|
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(2,103
|
)
|
(3,348
|
)
|
(2,047
|
)
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Levi Strauss & Co.
|
$
|
331,799
|
|
$
|
75,217
|
|
$
|
64,119
|
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
41
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
Levi Strauss & Co. Stockholders
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
Accumulated Earnings
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
Noncontrolling Interest
|
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at November 28, 2010
|
$
|
373
|
|
$
|
18,840
|
|
$
|
33,346
|
|
$
|
(272,168
|
)
|
$
|
10,808
|
|
$
|
(208,801
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
137,953
|
|
—
|
|
(2,841
|
)
|
135,112
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income (net of tax)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(73,834
|
)
|
794
|
|
(73,040
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation and dividends, net
|
1
|
|
10,436
|
|
(27
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,410
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
—
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(479
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash dividends paid
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(20,023
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(20,023
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Balance at November 27, 2011
|
374
|
|
29,266
|
|
150,770
|
|
(346,002
|
)
|
8,761
|
|
(156,831
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
143,850
|
|
—
|
|
(2,891
|
)
|
140,959
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss (net of tax)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(68,633
|
)
|
(457
|
)
|
(69,090
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation and dividends, net
|
—
|
|
4,118
|
|
(25
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,093
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
—
|
|
(19
|
)
|
(584
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash dividends paid
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(20,036
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(20,036
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Balance at November 25, 2012
|
374
|
|
33,365
|
|
273,975
|
|
(414,635
|
)
|
5,413
|
|
(101,508
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
229,193
|
|
—
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
228,136
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
102,606
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
101,560
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation and dividends, net
|
—
|
|
8,272
|
|
(23
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
8,249
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Reclassification to temporary equity
|
—
|
|
(30,641
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(30,641
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
—
|
|
(3,635
|
)
|
(2,109
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(5,744
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash dividends paid
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(25,076
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(25,076
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Balance at November 24, 2013
|
$
|
374
|
|
$
|
7,361
|
|
$
|
475,960
|
|
$
|
(312,029
|
)
|
$
|
3,310
|
|
$
|
174,976
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
42
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
228,136
|
|
$
|
140,959
|
|
$
|
135,112
|
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
115,720
|
|
122,608
|
|
117,793
|
|
|||||
|
Asset impairments
|
8,330
|
|
27,031
|
|
5,777
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
(2,112
|
)
|
(351
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|||||
|
Unrealized foreign exchange losses (gains)
|
4,573
|
|
(3,146
|
)
|
(5,932
|
)
|
|||||
|
Realized loss (gain) on settlement of forward foreign exchange contracts not designated for hedge accounting
|
2,904
|
|
(8,508
|
)
|
9,548
|
|
|||||
|
Employee benefit plans’ amortization from accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
22,686
|
|
1,412
|
|
(8,627
|
)
|
|||||
|
Employee benefit plans’ curtailment (gain) loss, net
|
(564
|
)
|
(2,391
|
)
|
129
|
|
|||||
|
Noncash loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net of write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
|
689
|
|
(3,643
|
)
|
226
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
4,331
|
|
4,323
|
|
4,345
|
|
|||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
8,249
|
|
5,965
|
|
8,439
|
|
|||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
1,158
|
|
5,024
|
|
4,634
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
37,520
|
|
19,853
|
|
16,153
|
|
|||||
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Trade receivables
|
65,955
|
|
145,717
|
|
(116,003
|
)
|
|||||
|
Inventories
|
(63,920
|
)
|
87,547
|
|
(6,848
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other current assets
|
32,808
|
|
34,384
|
|
(39,231
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other non-current assets
|
10,081
|
|
1,019
|
|
4,780
|
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
3,107
|
|
46,578
|
|
(55,300
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income tax liabilities
|
(24,042
|
)
|
(27,811
|
)
|
(15,242
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits and long-term employee related benefits
|
(51,974
|
)
|
(74,140
|
)
|
(55,846
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
8,618
|
|
7,995
|
|
(2,358
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other, net
|
(985
|
)
|
551
|
|
301
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
411,268
|
|
530,976
|
|
1,848
|
|
|||||
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(91,771
|
)
|
(83,855
|
)
|
(130,580
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
2,277
|
|
640
|
|
171
|
|
|||||
|
(Payments) proceeds on settlement of forward foreign exchange contracts not designated for hedge accounting
|
(2,904
|
)
|
8,508
|
|
(9,548
|
)
|
|||||
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
(400
|
)
|
(491
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(92,798
|
)
|
(75,198
|
)
|
(140,957
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
140,000
|
|
385,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Repayments of long-term debt and capital leases
|
(327,281
|
)
|
(407,963
|
)
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from senior revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
50,000
|
|
305,000
|
|
|||||
|
Repayments of senior revolving credit facility
|
—
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
(213,250
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from short-term credit facilities
|
46,187
|
|
121,200
|
|
78,137
|
|
|||||
|
Repayments of short-term credit facilities
|
(53,726
|
)
|
(124,517
|
)
|
(67,402
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other short-term borrowings, net
|
(3,711
|
)
|
2,623
|
|
8,692
|
|
|||||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
(2,557
|
)
|
(7,376
|
)
|
(7,307
|
)
|
|||||
|
Restricted cash
|
(139
|
)
|
565
|
|
(3,803
|
)
|
|||||
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
(5,744
|
)
|
(603
|
)
|
(489
|
)
|
|||||
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
1,538
|
|
168
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Dividend to stockholders
|
(25,076
|
)
|
(20,036
|
)
|
(20,023
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
|
(230,509
|
)
|
(250,939
|
)
|
77,707
|
|
|||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(4,837
|
)
|
(3,247
|
)
|
(3,782
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
83,124
|
|
201,592
|
|
(65,184
|
)
|
|||||
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents
|
406,134
|
|
204,542
|
|
269,726
|
|
|||||
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
489,258
|
|
$
|
406,134
|
|
204,542
|
|
|||
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest
|
$
|
121,827
|
|
$
|
128,718
|
|
$
|
129,079
|
|
||
|
Income taxes
|
47,350
|
|
49,346
|
|
56,229
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
43
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
NOVEMBER 24, 2013
,
NOVEMBER 25, 2012
, AND
NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
1
: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Levi Strauss & Co. (the “Company”) is one of the world’s leading branded apparel companies. The Company designs and markets jeans, casual and dress pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear and related accessories, for men, women and children around the world under the Levi’s
®
, Dockers
®
, Signature by Levi Strauss & Co.™ and Denizen
®
brands. The Company operates its business through
three
geographic regions: Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned foreign and domestic subsidiaries are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Company is privately held primarily by descendants of the family of its founder, Levi Strauss, and their relatives.
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Sunday of November in each year, although the fiscal years of certain foreign subsidiaries end on November 30. Each quarter of fiscal years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
consists of
13
weeks. All references to years relate to fiscal years rather than calendar years.
Subsequent events have been evaluated through the issuance date of these financial statements.
The financing section of the Company's consolidated statements of cash flows has been corrected to present the proceeds and repayments of short-term credit facility borrowings with terms greater than three months on a gross basis. Amounts were previously presented on a net basis. There was no change to the total financing cash flows and the change was immaterial to the financial statements taken as a whole.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements. Estimates are based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of the Company’s management. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to assist in its evaluations. Changes in such estimates, based on more accurate future information, or different assumptions or conditions, may affect amounts reported in future periods.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily relates to required cash deposits for customs and rental guarantees to support the Company's international operations. As restricted cash is not material in any period presented, it is included in “Other current assets” and “Other non-current assets” on the consolidated balance sheets.
Accounts Receivable, Net
The Company extends credit to its customers that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria. Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable at the date of the consolidated financial statements, assessments of collectability based on historic trends, customer-specific circumstances, and an evaluation of economic conditions. Actual write-off of receivables may differ from estimates due to changes in customer and economic circumstances.
44
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Inventory Valuation
The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market value. Inventory cost is determined using the first-in first-out method. The Company includes product costs, labor and related overhead, inbound freight, internal transfers, and the cost of operating its remaining manufacturing facilities, including the related depreciation expense, in the cost of inventories. The Company estimates quantities of slow-moving and obsolete inventory, by reviewing on-hand quantities, outstanding purchase obligations and forecasted sales. The Company determines inventory market values by estimating expected selling prices based on the Company's historical recovery rates for slow-moving and obsolete inventory and other factors, such as market conditions, expected channel of distribution and current consumer preferences.
Income Tax Assets and Liabilities
The Company is subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The Company computes its provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income for the years in which those tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. Significant judgments are required in order to determine the realizability of these deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company's management evaluates all significant available positive and negative evidence, including historical operating results, estimates of future taxable income and the existence of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
The Company continuously reviews issues raised in connection with all ongoing examinations and open tax years to evaluate the adequacy of its tax liabilities. The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions under a two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the uncertain tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination based on its technical merits. The second step, for those positions that meet the recognition criteria, is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than fifty percent likely to be realized. The Company believes that its recorded tax liabilities are adequate to cover all open tax years based on its assessment. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions and involves significant judgments about future events. To the extent that the Company's view as to the outcome of these matters change, the Company will adjust income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. The Company classifies interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The cost is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Costs relating to internal-use software development are capitalized when incurred during the application development phase. Buildings are depreciated over
20
to
40
years, and leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the life of the improvement or the initial lease term. Machinery and equipment includes furniture and fixtures, automobiles and trucks, and networking communication equipment, and is depreciated over a range from
three
to
20
years. Capitalized internal-use software is depreciated over periods ranging from
three
to
seven
years.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill resulted primarily from a 1985 acquisition of the Company by Levi Strauss Associates Inc., a former parent company that was subsequently merged into the Company in 1996, and the Company's 2009 acquisitions. Goodwill is not amortized. Intangible assets are comprised of owned trademarks with indefinite useful lives which are not being amortized as well as acquired contractual rights and customers lists with finite lives which are being amortized over periods ranging from
four
to
eight
years. The amortization of these intangible assets is included in "Selling, general, and administrative expenses" in the Company's consolidated statements of income.
45
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Impairment
The Company reviews its goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year, or more frequently as warranted by events or changes in circumstances which indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company qualitatively assesses goodwill impairment for certain reporting units and impairment for other non-amortized intangible assets to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or other non-amortized intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. For goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets not assessed qualitatively, a two-step quantitative approach is utilized. In the first step, the Company compares the carrying value of the reporting unit or applicable asset to its fair value, which the Company estimates using a discounted cash flow analysis or by comparison with the market values of similar assets. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit or asset exceeds its estimated fair value, the Company performs the second step, and determines the impairment loss, if any, as the excess of the carrying value of the goodwill or intangible asset over its fair value.
The Company reviews its other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the expected future undiscounted cash flows, the Company measures and records an impairment loss for the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.
To determine the fair value of impaired assets, the Company utilizes the valuation technique or techniques deemed most appropriate based on the nature of the impaired asset and the data available, which may include the use of quoted market prices, prices for similar assets or other valuation techniques such as discounted future cash flows or earnings.
Debt Issuance Costs
The Company capitalizes debt issuance costs, which are included in “Other non-current assets” in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Bond issuance costs are generally amortized utilizing the effective interest method whereas revolving credit facility issuance costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method. Amortization of debt issuance costs is included in “Interest expense” in the consolidated statements of income.
Deferred Rent
The Company is obligated under operating leases of property for manufacturing, finishing and distribution facilities, office space, retail stores and equipment. Rental expense relating to operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term after consideration of lease incentives and scheduled rent escalations beginning as of the date the Company takes physical possession or control of the property. Differences between rental expense and actual rental payments are recorded as deferred rent liabilities included in “Other accrued liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values of the Company's financial instruments reflect the amounts that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The fair value estimates presented in this report are based on information available to the Company as of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
.
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and short-term borrowings approximate fair value. The Company has estimated the fair value of its other financial instruments using the market and income approaches. Rabbi trust assets and forward foreign exchange contracts are carried at their fair values. The Company's debt instruments are carried at historical cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums or discounts, foreign currency fluctuations and principal payments.
46
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans covering eligible employees. The Company also provides certain health care benefits for U.S. employees who meet age, participation and length of service requirements at retirement. In addition, the Company sponsors other retirement or post-employment plans for its foreign employees in accordance with local government programs and requirements. The Company retains the right to amend, curtail or discontinue any aspect of the plans, subject to local regulations.
The Company recognizes either an asset or a liability for any plan's funded status in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company measures changes in funded status using actuarial models which utilize an attribution approach that generally spreads individual events over the estimated service lives of the remaining employees in the plan. For plans where participants will not earn additional benefits by rendering future service, which includes the Company's U.S. plans, individual events are spread over the plan participants' estimated remaining lives. The Company's policy is to fund its retirement plans based upon actuarial recommendations and in accordance with applicable laws, income tax regulations and credit agreements. Net pension and postretirement benefit income or expense is generally determined using assumptions which include expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, compensation rate increases and medical and mortality trend rates. The Company considers several factors including historical rates, expected rates and external data to determine the assumptions used in the actuarial models.
Employee Incentive Compensation
The Company maintains short-term and long-term employee incentive compensation plans. Provisions for employee incentive compensation are recorded in “Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits” and “Long-term employee related benefits” in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The Company accrues the related compensation expense over the period of the plan and changes in the liabilities for these incentive plans generally correlate with the Company's financial results and projected future financial performance.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has stock-based incentive plans which reward certain employees and directors with cash or equity. Compensation cost for these awards is estimated based on the number of awards that are expected to vest. Compensation cost for equity awards is measured based on the fair value at the grant date, while liability award expense is measured and adjusted based on the fair value at the end of each quarter. No compensation cost is ultimately recognized for certain equity awards which are unvested and forfeited at an employees' termination date or for liability awards which are out-of-the-money at the award expiration date. Compensation cost for performance awards with a market condition is recognized regardless of whether the performance or market condition is met, as long as the employee has not terminated prior to the vesting date. Compensation cost is recognized over the period that an employee provides service for that award, which generally is the vesting period.
The Company's common stock is not listed on any established stock exchange. Accordingly, the stock's fair value is approved by the Company's board of directors (the "Board") and determined based upon a valuation performed by an independent third-party, Evercore Group LLC (“Evercore”). Determining the fair value of the Company's stock requires complex judgments. The valuation process includes comparison of the Company's historical and estimated future financial results with selected publicly-traded companies and application of an appropriate discount for the illiquidity of the stock to derive the fair value of the stock. The Company uses this valuation for, among other things, making determinations under its stock-based compensation plans, such as the grant date fair value of awards.
The fair value of equity awards granted to employees is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including volatility. Due to the fact that the Company's common stock is not publicly traded, the computation of expected volatility is based on the average of the historical and implied volatilities, over the expected life of the awards, of comparable companies from a representative peer group of publicly-traded entities, selected based on industry and financial attributes. Other assumptions include expected life, risk-free rate of interest and dividend yield. Beginning in 2012, for equity awards with a service condition, the expected life is derived based on historical experience and expected future post-vesting termination and exercise patterns. Expected life for equity awards with a performance condition and awards with a service condition granted prior to 2012 is computed using the simplified method until historical experience is available. The risk-free interest rate is based on zero coupon U.S. Treasury bond rates corresponding to the expected life of the awards. Dividend assumptions are based on historical experience.
47
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The fair value of equity awards granted to directors is based on the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant. The fair value of liability awards granted prior to 2013 is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is calculated using the common stock value and assumptions at each quarter end. The fair value of liability awards granted in 2013 is calculated using the common stock fair value at each quarter end.
Due to the job function of the award recipients, the Company has included stock-based compensation cost in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of income.
Self-Insurance
Up to certain limits, the Company self-insures various loss exposures primarily relating to workers' compensation risk and employee and eligible retiree medical health benefits. The Company carries insurance policies covering claim exposures which exceed predefined amounts, per occurrence and/or in the aggregate.
Accruals for losses are made based on the Company's claims experience and actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry, including provisions for incurred but not reported losses.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company recognizes all derivatives as assets and liabilities at their fair values, which are included in "Other current assets", "Other non-current assets" or "Other accrued liabilities" on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The Company uses derivatives to manage exposures that are sensitive to changes in market conditions, such as foreign currency risk. Additionally, some of the Company's contracts contain provisions that are accounted for as embedded derivative instruments. The Company does not designate its derivative instruments for hedge accounting; changes in the fair values of these instruments are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the Company's consolidated statements of income. The non-derivative instruments the Company designates and that qualify for hedge accounting treatment hedge the Company's net investment position in certain of its foreign subsidiaries. For these instruments, the Company documents the hedge designation by identifying the hedging instrument, the nature of the risk being hedged and the approach for measuring hedge effectiveness. The ineffective portions of these hedges are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the Company's consolidated statements of income. The effective portions of these hedges are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the Company's consolidated balance sheets and are not reclassified to earnings until the related net investment position has been liquidated.
Foreign Currency
The functional currency for most of the Company's foreign operations is the applicable local currency. For those operations, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars using period-end exchange rates, income and expenses are translated at average monthly exchange rates, and equity accounts are translated at historical rates. Net changes resulting from such translations are recorded as a component of translation adjustments in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in a currency other than the entity's functional currency. At each balance sheet date, each entity remeasures the recorded balances related to foreign-currency transactions using the period-end exchange rate. Gains or losses arising from the remeasurement of these balances are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the Company's consolidated statements of income. In addition, at the settlement date of foreign currency transactions, foreign currency gains and losses are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the Company's consolidated statements of income to reflect the difference between the rate effective at the settlement date and the historical rate at which the transaction was originally recorded.
Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest includes a
16.4%
minority interest of third parties in Levi Strauss Japan K.K., the Company's Japanese subsidiary.
48
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Revenue Recognition
Net sales is primarily comprised of sales of products to wholesale customers, including franchised stores, and direct sales to consumers at the Company's company-operated and online stores and at the Company's company-operated shop-in-shops located within department stores. The Company recognizes revenue on sale of product when the goods are shipped or delivered and title to the goods passes to the customer provided that: there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. The revenue is recorded net of an allowance for estimated returns, discounts and retailer promotions and other similar incentives. Licensing revenues from the use of the Company's trademarks in connection with the manufacturing, advertising, and distribution of trademarked products by third-party licensees are earned and recognized as products are sold by licensees based on royalty rates set forth in the licensing agreements.
The Company recognizes allowances for estimated returns in the period in which the related sale is recorded. The Company recognizes allowances for estimated discounts, retailer promotions and other similar incentives at the later of the period in which the related sale is recorded or the period in which the sales incentive is offered to the customer. The Company estimates non-volume based allowances based on historical rates as well as customer and product-specific circumstances. Sales and value-added taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis in the consolidated statements of income.
Net sales to the Company's
ten
largest customers totaled approximately
31%
,
32%
and
30%
of net revenues for
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively. No customer represented 10% or more of net revenues in any of these years.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold includes the expenses incurred to acquire and produce inventory for sale, including product costs, labor and related overhead, inbound freight, internal transfers, and the cost of operating the Company's remaining manufacturing facilities, including the related depreciation expense.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") are primarily comprised of costs relating to advertising, marketing, selling, distribution, information technology and other corporate functions. Costs relating to the Company's licensing activities are also included in SG&A. Selling costs include, among other things, all occupancy costs associated with company-operated stores and with the Company's company-operated shop-in-shops located within department stores. The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. For
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, total advertising expense was
$274.0 million
,
$260.4 million
and
$313.8 million
, respectively. Distribution costs include costs related to receiving and inspection at distribution centers, warehousing, shipping to the Company's customers, handling and certain other activities associated with the Company's distribution network. These expenses totaled
$171.7 million
,
$186.7 million
and
$183.9 million
for
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
The following recently issued accounting standard will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2015:
|
•
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11,
"Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists,"
("ASU 2013-11"). ASU 2013-11 requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward when settlement in this manner is available under the tax law. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
|
49
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
2
: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The components of property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) were as follows:
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
21,240
|
|
$
|
21,319
|
|
|||
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
408,486
|
|
404,438
|
|
|||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
439,627
|
|
473,014
|
|
|||||
|
Capitalized internal-use software
|
324,818
|
|
285,960
|
|
|||||
|
Construction in progress
|
21,623
|
|
56,842
|
|
|||||
|
Subtotal
|
1,215,794
|
|
1,241,573
|
|
|
||||
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(775,933
|
)
|
(782,766
|
)
|
|||||
|
PP&E, net
|
$
|
439,861
|
|
$
|
458,807
|
|
|
||
Depreciation expense for the years ended
November 24, 2013
,
November 25, 2012
, and
November 27, 2011
, was
$104.6 million
,
$110.5 million
and
$104.8 million
, respectively.
50
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
3
: GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business segment for the years ended
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, were as follows:
|
Americas
|
Europe
|
Asia Pacific
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, November 27, 2011
|
$
|
207,418
|
|
$
|
31,523
|
|
$
|
2,029
|
|
$
|
240,970
|
|
|||||
|
Foreign currency fluctuation
|
5
|
|
(896
|
)
|
(108
|
)
|
(999
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Balance, November 25, 2012
|
207,423
|
|
30,627
|
|
1,921
|
|
239,971
|
|
|||||||||
|
Additions
|
—
|
|
156
|
|
—
|
|
156
|
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign currency fluctuation
|
—
|
|
1,327
|
|
(226
|
)
|
1,101
|
|
|||||||||
|
Balance, November 24, 2013
|
$
|
207,423
|
|
$
|
32,110
|
|
$
|
1,695
|
|
$
|
241,228
|
|
|||||
Other intangible assets, net, were as follows:
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross Carrying Value
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Total
|
Gross Carrying Value
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-amortized intangible assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trademarks
|
$
|
42,743
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
42,743
|
|
$
|
42,743
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
42,743
|
|
|||||
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Acquired contractual rights
|
7,882
|
|
(6,134
|
)
|
1,748
|
|
42,220
|
|
(32,163
|
)
|
10,057
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Customer lists
|
20,221
|
|
(15,563
|
)
|
4,658
|
|
19,326
|
|
(12,217
|
)
|
7,109
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
70,846
|
|
$
|
(21,697
|
)
|
$
|
49,149
|
|
$
|
104,289
|
|
$
|
(44,380
|
)
|
$
|
59,909
|
|
|||||
For the years ended
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, amortization of these intangible assets were
$10.5 million
and
$11.4 million
, respectively. The amortization of these intangible assets in the succeeding fiscal years is immaterial.
As of
November 24, 2013
, there was
no
impairment to the carrying value of the Company's goodwill or non-amortized intangible assets.
51
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
4
: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments that are carried at fair value:
|
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Fair Value Estimated
Using
|
|
Fair Value Estimated
Using
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value
|
Level 1 Inputs
(1)
|
Level 2 Inputs
(2)
|
Fair Value
|
Level 1 Inputs
(1)
|
Level 2 Inputs
(2)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial assets carried at fair value
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rabbi trust assets
|
$
|
23,752
|
|
$
|
23,752
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
20,322
|
|
$
|
20,322
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts, net
(3)
|
7,145
|
|
—
|
|
7,145
|
|
5,792
|
|
—
|
|
5,792
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
30,897
|
|
$
|
23,752
|
|
$
|
7,145
|
|
$
|
26,114
|
|
$
|
20,322
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|||||
|
Financial liabilities carried at fair value
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts, net
(3)
|
$
|
2,335
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,335
|
|
$
|
3,018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,018
|
|
|||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Fair values estimated using Level 1 inputs are inputs which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Rabbi trust assets consist of a diversified portfolio of equity, fixed income and other securities. See Note
12
for more information on rabbi trust assets.
|
|
(2)
|
Fair values estimated using Level 2 inputs are inputs, other than quoted prices, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly and include among other things, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active or inactive as well as inputs other than quoted prices that are observable. For forward foreign exchange contracts, inputs include foreign currency exchange and interest rates and, where applicable, credit default swap prices.
|
|
(3)
|
The Company’s over-the-counter forward foreign exchange contracts are subject to International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. master agreements. These agreements permit the net-settlement of these contracts on a per-institution basis.
|
The following table presents the carrying value – including related accrued interest – and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments that are carried at adjusted historical cost:
|
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
Estimated Fair Value
(1)
|
Carrying
Value
|
Estimated Fair Value
(1)
|
|||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Financial liabilities carried at adjusted historical cost
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Senior term loan due 2014
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
324,890
|
|
$
|
324,484
|
|
|||
|
4.25% Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016
|
39,659
|
|
38,523
|
|
48,656
|
|
47,201
|
|
|||||||
|
7.75% Euro senior notes due 2018
|
405,304
|
|
432,098
|
|
387,433
|
|
416,422
|
|
|||||||
|
7.625% senior notes due 2020
|
526,112
|
|
577,956
|
|
526,223
|
|
572,161
|
|
|||||||
|
6.875% senior notes due 2022
|
537,447
|
|
588,275
|
|
386,838
|
|
404,163
|
|
|||||||
|
Short-term borrowings
|
41,976
|
|
41,976
|
|
59,861
|
|
59,861
|
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,550,498
|
|
$
|
1,678,828
|
|
$
|
1,733,901
|
|
$
|
1,824,292
|
|
|||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Fair value estimate incorporates mid-market price quotes.
|
52
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
5
: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company's foreign currency management objective is to minimize the effect of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on nonfunctional currency cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries and selected assets or liabilities of the Company and its subsidiaries without exposing the Company to additional risk associated with transactions that could be regarded as speculative. Forward exchange contracts on various currencies are entered into to manage foreign currency exposures associated with certain product sourcing activities, some intercompany sales, foreign subsidiaries' royalty payments, interest payments, earnings repatriations, net investment in foreign operations and funding activities. The Company manages certain forecasted foreign currency exposures and uses a centralized currency management operation to take advantage of potential opportunities to naturally offset foreign currency exposures against each other. The Company designates its outstanding Euro senior notes and a portion of its outstanding Yen-denominated Eurobonds as net investment hedges to manage foreign currency exposures in its foreign operations. The Company does not apply hedge accounting to its derivative transactions. As of
November 24, 2013
, the Company had forward foreign exchange contracts to buy
$519.5 million
and to sell
$233.9 million
against various foreign currencies. These contracts are at various exchange rates and expire at various dates through
January 2015
.
The table below provides data about the carrying values of derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments:
|
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Assets
|
(Liabilities)
|
Derivative Net Carrying Value
|
Assets
|
(Liabilities)
|
Derivative Net Carrying Value
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
11,145
|
|
$
|
(4,000
|
)
|
$
|
7,145
|
|
$
|
7,131
|
|
$
|
(1,339
|
)
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|||||
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
880
|
|
(3,215
|
)
|
(2,335
|
)
|
5,183
|
|
(8,201
|
)
|
(3,018
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
12,025
|
|
$
|
(7,215
|
)
|
$
|
12,314
|
|
$
|
(9,540
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Non-derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.25% Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(20,564
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(28,135
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
7.75% Euro senior notes due 2018
|
—
|
|
(404,430
|
)
|
—
|
|
(386,520
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(424,994
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(414,655
|
)
|
|||||||||||
The table below provides data about the amount of gains and losses related to derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments designated as net investment hedges:
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in AOCI
(Effective Portion)
|
Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Other
Income (Expense), net (Ineffective
Portion and Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
As of
|
As of
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
4,637
|
|
$
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
4.25% Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016
|
(21,161
|
)
|
(26,285
|
)
|
$
|
3,839
|
|
$
|
3,474
|
|
$
|
(5,033
|
)
|
||||||
|
7.75% Euro senior notes due 2018
|
(27,361
|
)
|
(9,451
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cumulative income taxes
|
17,186
|
|
12,246
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(26,699
|
)
|
$
|
(18,853
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
53
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The table below provides data about the amount of gains and losses related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments included in “Other income (expense), net” in the Company’s consolidated statements of income:
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
||||||||||
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts:
|
|||||||||||
|
Realized
|
$
|
(2,904
|
)
|
$
|
8,508
|
|
$
|
(9,548
|
)
|
||
|
Unrealized
|
2,365
|
|
(17,952
|
)
|
24,858
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
(539
|
)
|
$
|
(9,444
|
)
|
$
|
15,310
|
|
||
NOTE
6
: DEBT
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
|||||||||
|
Unsecured:
|
|||||||||
|
Senior term loan due 2014
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
324,424
|
|
|||
|
4.25% Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016
|
39,545
|
|
48,508
|
|
|||||
|
7.75% Euro senior notes due 2018
|
404,430
|
|
386,520
|
|
|||||
|
7.625% senior notes due 2020
|
525,000
|
|
525,000
|
|
|||||
|
6.875% senior notes due 2022
|
535,041
|
|
385,000
|
|
|||||
|
Total unsecured
|
1,504,016
|
|
1,669,452
|
|
|||||
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
1,504,016
|
|
$
|
1,669,452
|
|
|||
|
Short-term debt
|
|||||||||
|
Short-term borrowings
|
41,861
|
|
59,759
|
|
|||||
|
Total short-term debt
|
$
|
41,861
|
|
$
|
59,759
|
|
|||
|
Total long-term and short-term debt
|
$
|
1,545,877
|
|
$
|
1,729,211
|
|
|||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility
The Company is a party to a credit agreement for a senior secured revolving credit facility. The credit agreement provides for an asset-based facility, in which the borrowing availability is primarily based on the value of the U.S. Levi's
®
trademarks and the levels of accounts receivable and inventory in the United States and Canada, as further described below.
Availability, interest and maturity.
The maximum availability under the credit facility is
$850.0 million
, of which
$800.0 million
is available to the Company for revolving loans in U.S. Dollars and
$50.0 million
is available to the Company for revolving loans either in U.S. Dollars or Canadian Dollars. Subject to the level of this borrowing base, the Company may make and repay borrowings from time to time until the maturity of the credit facility. The Company may make voluntary prepayments of borrowings at any time and must make mandatory prepayments if certain events occur. Borrowings under the credit agreement will bear an interest rate of LIBOR plus
150
to
275
basis points, depending on borrowing base availability, and undrawn availability bears a rate of
37.5
to
50
basis points. The credit facility has a maturity date of September 30, 2016. Upon the maturity date, all of the obligations outstanding under the credit agreement become due.
54
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The Company’s unused availability under its senior secured revolving credit facility was
$635.3 million
at
November 24, 2013
, as the Company’s total availability of
$701.5 million
, based on the collateral levels discussed above, was reduced by
$66.2 million
of letters of credit and other credit usage allocated under the facility. The
$66.2 million
was comprised of
$13.3 million
of other credit usage and
$52.9 million
of stand-by letters of credit with various international banks which serve as guarantees to cover U.S. workers' compensation claims and the working capital requirements for certain subsidiaries, primarily India.
Guarantees and security.
The Company's obligations under the credit agreement are guaranteed by its domestic subsidiaries. The obligations under the agreement are secured by, among other domestic assets, certain U.S. trademarks associated with the Levi's
®
brand and accounts receivable, goods and inventory in the United States. Additionally, the obligations of Levi Strauss & Co. (Canada) Inc. under the credit agreement are secured by Canadian accounts receivable, goods, inventory and other Canadian assets. The lien on the U.S. Levi's
®
trademarks and related intellectual property may be released at the Company's discretion so long as it meets certain conditions; such release would reduce the borrowing base.
Covenants.
The credit agreement contains customary covenants restricting the Company's activities as well as those of the Company's subsidiaries, including limitations on the ability to sell assets; engage in mergers; enter into transactions involving related parties or derivatives; incur or prepay indebtedness or grant liens or negative pledges on the Company's assets; make loans or other investments; pay dividends or repurchase stock or other securities; guaranty third-party obligations; and make changes in the Company's corporate structure. There are exceptions to these covenants, and some are only applicable when unused availability falls below specified thresholds. In addition, the credit agreement includes, as a financial covenant, a springing fixed charge coverage ratio of
1.0
:1.0, which arises when availability falls below a specified threshold.
Events of default.
The credit agreement contains customary events of default, including payment failures; failure to comply with covenants; failure to satisfy other obligations under the credit agreements or related documents; defaults in respect of other indebtedness; bankruptcy, insolvency and inability to pay debts when due; material judgments; pension plan terminations or specified underfunding; substantial stock ownership changes; and specified changes in the composition of the Board . The cross-default provisions in the agreement apply if a default occurs on other indebtedness in excess of
$50.0 million
and the applicable grace period in respect of the indebtedness has expired, such that the lenders of or trustee for the defaulted indebtedness have the right to accelerate. If an event of default occurs under the credit agreement, the lenders may terminate their commitments, declare immediately payable all borrowings under the agreement and foreclose on the collateral.
Senior Term Loan due 2014
The Company was a party to a senior unsecured term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan, entered into in 2007, consisted of a single borrowing of
$325.0 million
, net of a
0.75%
discount to the lenders. The Term Loan bore interest at
2.25%
over
LIBOR
or
1.25%
over the base rate. During the
year ended
November 24, 2013
, the Company repaid in full the remaining balance of its Senior Term Loan due 2014 with the proceeds of the notes issued on March 14, 2013, and cash on hand. See “Issuance of Additional Senior Notes due 2022” below.
Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016
In 1996, the Company issued
¥20 billion
principal amount Eurobonds (equivalent to approximately
$180.0 million
at the time of issuance) due in November 2016, with interest payable at
4.25%
per annum. The bond is redeemable at the option of the Company at a make-whole redemption price. The Company repurchased a portion of the Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016 in May 2010, and again in May 2012, as described below.
The agreement governing these bonds contains customary events of default and restricts the Company's ability and the ability of its subsidiaries and future subsidiaries to incur liens; engage in sale and leaseback transactions and engage in mergers and sales of assets. The agreement contains a cross-acceleration event of default that applies if any of the Company's debt in excess of
$25.0 million
is accelerated and the debt is not discharged or acceleration rescinded within 30 days after the Company's receipt of a notice of default from the fiscal agent or from the holders of at least
25%
of the principal amount of the bond.
Euro Notes due 2018 and Senior Notes due 2020
Principal, interest and maturity
. On May 6, 2010, the Company issued
€300.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of
7.75%
Euro senior notes due 2018 (the “Euro Notes due 2018”) and
$525.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of
7.625%
senior notes due 2020 (the “Senior Notes due 2020”) to qualified institutional buyers. The notes are unsecured obligations that
55
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
rank equally with all of the Company's other existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The Euro Notes due 2018 mature on May 15, 2018, and the Senior Notes due 2020 mature on May 15, 2020. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15, commencing on November 15, 2010. The Company may redeem some or all of the Euro Notes due 2018 prior to May 15, 2014, and some or all of the Senior Notes due 2020 prior to May 15, 2015, each at a price equal to
100%
of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and a “make-whole” premium; after these dates, the Company may redeem all or any portion of the notes, at once or over time, at redemption prices specified in the indenture governing the notes, after giving the required notice under the indenture. Costs representing underwriting fees and other expenses of
$17.5 million
are amortized over the term of the notes to interest expense.
Covenants
. The indenture governing both notes contains covenants that limit, among other things, the Company's and certain of the Company's subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt; make certain restricted payments; consummate specified asset sales; enter into transactions with affiliates; incur liens; impose restrictions on the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends or make payments to the Company and its restricted subsidiaries; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; merge or consolidate with another person; and dispose of all or substantially all of the Company's assets. The indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the trustee under the indenture or holders of at least
25%
in principal amount of the then outstanding notes may declare all notes to be due and payable immediately. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the indenture), each holder of notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the notes in cash at a price equal to
101%
of the principal amount of notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of purchase.
Use of Proceeds
. The proceeds from the issuance of the Euro Notes due 2018 and the Senior Notes due 2020 were used to repurchase and repay all of the Company's then-existing Euro Notes due 2013 and Senior Notes due 2015. The proceeds were also used to repurchase
¥10,883,500,000
in principal amount tendered of the Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016 for total consideration of
$100.0 million
including accrued interest.
Senior Notes due 2022
Principal, interest and maturity
. On May 8, 2012, the Company issued
$385.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of
6.875%
senior notes due 2022 (the “Senior Notes due 2022”) to qualified institutional buyers and to purchasers outside the United States in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The notes are unsecured obligations that rank equally with all of the Company's other existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The Senior Notes due 2022 mature on May 1, 2022. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, commencing on November 1, 2012. The Company may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes due 2022 prior to May 1, 2017, at a price equal to
100%
of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and a “make-whole” premium; on or after this date, the Company may redeem all or any portion of the notes, at once or over time, at redemption prices specified in the indenture governing the notes, after giving the required notice under the indenture. In addition, at any time prior to May 1, 2015, the Company may redeem up to a maximum of
35%
of the original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes due 2022 with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of
106.875%
of the principal amount of the Senior Notes due 2022, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. Costs of approximately
$7.4 million
associated with the issuance of the notes, representing underwriting fees and other expenses, are amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes.
Covenants
. The indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, the Company's and certain of the Company's subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt, make certain restricted payments, consummate specified asset sales, enter into transactions with affiliates, incur liens, impose restrictions on the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends or make payments to the Company and its restricted subsidiaries, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, merge or consolidate with another person, and dispose of all or substantially all of the Company's assets. The indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the trustee under the indenture or holders of at least
25%
in principal amount of the then outstanding notes may declare all the notes to be due and payable immediately. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the indenture), each holder of notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the notes in cash at a
56
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
price equal to
101%
of the principal amount of notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of purchase.
Use of Proceeds
. The proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes due 2022 were used to repurchase and repay all of the Company's then-existing Senior Notes due 2016. The proceeds were also used to repurchase
¥5,116,500,000
in aggregate principal amount tendered of the Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016 for total consideration of
$56.4 million
including interest.
Issuance of Additional Senior Notes due 2022
Additional Senior Notes due 2022
. On March 14, 2013, the Company issued an additional
$140.0 million
in
6.875%
senior notes due 2022 (the “Additional Senior Notes due 2022”) to qualified institutional buyers in compliance with the Securities Act. The Additional Senior Notes due 2022 have the same terms and are part of the same series as the existing Senior Notes due 2022 the Company issued in May 2012. The Additional Senior Notes due 2022 were offered at a premium of
$11.2 million
, which will be amortized as a reduction to interest expense over the term of the notes. Costs of approximately
$2.6 million
associated with the issuance of the notes, representing underwriting fees and other expenses, will also be amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes.
Covenants.
The Additional Senior Notes due 2022 and the existing Senior Notes due 2022 are treated as a single class for all purposes under the indenture governing the Company's Senior Notes due 2022, including without limitation, the covenants, events of default, asset sale, change of control, covenant suspension and other terms.
Use of Proceeds
. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering, together with cash on hand, to prepay in full its Senior Term Loan due 2014.
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings consist of term loans and revolving credit facilities at various foreign subsidiaries which the Company expects to either pay over the next twelve months or refinance at the end of their applicable terms. Certain of these borrowings are guaranteed by stand-by letters of credit allocated under the Company's senior secured revolving credit facility.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
During the
year ended
November 24, 2013
, the Company repaid in full the remaining balance of its Senior Term Loan due 2014 and recorded a loss on the early extinguishment of debt, which was comprised of the write-off of the remaining unamortized discount and unamortized debt issuance costs.
During the
year ended
November 25, 2012
, the Company repurchased and repaid in full its then-existing Senior Notes due 2016 and partially repurchased a portion of its Yen-denominated Eurobonds due 2016. The Company recorded a net loss of
$8.2 million
on early extinguishment of debt, primarily comprised of a tender premium of
$11.4 million
and the write-off of
$4.0 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs, partially offset by a gain of
$7.6 million
related to the partial repurchase of Yen-denominated Eurobonds at a discount to their par value.
57
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The table below sets forth, as of
November 24, 2013
, the Company's required aggregate short-term and long-term debt principal payments (inclusive of premium and discount) for the next five fiscal years and thereafter.
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||
|
2014
|
$
|
41,861
|
|
||
|
2015
|
—
|
|
|||
|
2016
|
39,545
|
|
|||
|
2017
|
—
|
|
|||
|
2018
|
404,430
|
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
1,060,041
|
|
|||
|
Total future debt principal payments
|
$
|
1,545,877
|
|
||
Interest Rates on Borrowings
The Company’s weighted-average interest rate on average borrowings outstanding during
2013
,
2012
and
2011
was
7.52%
,
7.05%
and
6.90%
, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on average borrowings outstanding includes the amortization of capitalized bank fees and underwriting fees, and excludes interest on obligations to participants under deferred compensation plans.
Dividends and Restrictions
The terms of certain of the indentures relating to the Company's unsecured notes and its senior secured revolving credit facility agreement contain covenants that restrict the Company's ability to pay dividends to its stockholders. For information about the Company's dividend payments, see Note
14
. As of
November 24, 2013
, and at the time the dividends were paid, the Company met the requirements of its debt instruments. Subsidiaries of the Company that are not wholly-owned subsidiaries are permitted under the indentures to pay dividends to all stockholders either on a pro rata basis or on a basis that results in the receipt by the Company of dividends or distributions of greater value than it would receive on a pro rata basis. The Company has not entered into any arrangements that would restrict the transfer of the assets of the Company's subsidiaries to the Company in the form of loans, advances or cash dividends.
58
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
7
: GUARANTEES
Indemnification agreements.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into agreements containing indemnification provisions under which the Company agrees to indemnify the other party for specified claims and losses. For example, the Company's trademark license agreements, real estate leases, consulting agreements, logistics outsourcing agreements, securities purchase agreements and credit agreements typically contain such provisions. This type of indemnification provision obligates the Company to pay certain amounts associated with claims brought against the other party as the result of trademark infringement, negligence or willful misconduct of Company employees, breach of contract by the Company including inaccuracy of representations and warranties, specified lawsuits in which the Company and the other party are co-defendants, product claims and other matters. These amounts generally are not readily quantifiable; the maximum possible liability or amount of potential payments that could arise out of an indemnification claim depends entirely on the specific facts and circumstances associated with the claim. The Company has insurance coverage that minimizes the potential exposure to certain of such claims. The Company also believes that the likelihood of material payment obligations under these agreements to third parties is low.
Covenants.
The Company's long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants restricting its activities as well as those of its subsidiaries, including limitations on its, and its subsidiaries', ability to sell assets; engage in mergers; enter into capital leases or certain leases not in the ordinary course of business; enter into transactions involving related parties or derivatives; incur or prepay indebtedness or grant liens or negative pledges on its assets; make loans or other investments; pay dividends or repurchase stock or other securities; guaranty third-party obligations; make capital expenditures; and make changes in its corporate structure. For additional information see Note
6
. As of
November 24, 2013
, the Company was in compliance with all of these covenants.
NOTE
8
: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Pension plans.
The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans covering eligible employees. Plan assets are invested in a diversified portfolio of securities including stocks, bonds, real estate investment funds, cash equivalents, and alternative investments. Benefits payable under the plans are based on years of service, final average compensation, or both. The Company retains the right to amend, curtail or discontinue any aspect of the plans, subject to local regulations.
Postretirement plans.
The Company maintains plans that provide postretirement benefits to eligible employees, principally health care, to substantially all U.S. retirees and their qualified dependents. These plans were established with the intention that they would continue indefinitely. However, the Company retains the right to amend, curtail or discontinue any aspect of the plans at any time. The plans are contributory and contain certain cost-sharing features, such as deductibles and coinsurance. The Company's policy is to fund postretirement benefits as claims and premiums are paid.
59
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The following tables summarize activity of the Company's defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$
|
1,388,650
|
|
$
|
1,203,677
|
|
$
|
155,864
|
|
$
|
156,060
|
|
|||
|
Service cost
|
8,707
|
|
8,952
|
|
376
|
|
397
|
|
|||||||
|
Interest cost
|
51,984
|
|
57,635
|
|
4,957
|
|
6,634
|
|
|||||||
|
Plan participants' contribution
|
771
|
|
884
|
|
5,242
|
|
5,531
|
|
|||||||
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
(1)
|
(114,441
|
)
|
184,183
|
|
(10,626
|
)
|
10,408
|
|
|||||||
|
Net curtailment gain
|
(341
|
)
|
(2,379
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Impact of foreign currency changes
|
1,219
|
|
1,103
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Plan settlements
|
(7,909
|
)
|
(867
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Special termination benefits
|
74
|
|
159
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Net benefits paid
(2)
|
(94,915
|
)
|
(64,697
|
)
|
(20,218
|
)
|
(23,166
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
$
|
1,233,799
|
|
$
|
1,388,650
|
|
$
|
135,595
|
|
$
|
155,864
|
|
|||
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
894,362
|
|
771,914
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Actual return on plan assets
(3)
|
75,683
|
|
125,430
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Employer contribution
|
35,064
|
|
60,096
|
|
14,976
|
|
17,635
|
|
|||||||
|
Plan participants' contributions
|
771
|
|
884
|
|
5,242
|
|
5,531
|
|
|||||||
|
Plan settlements
|
(7,909
|
)
|
(867
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Impact of foreign currency changes
|
(23
|
)
|
1,602
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(94,915
|
)
|
(64,697
|
)
|
(20,218
|
)
|
(23,166
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
903,033
|
|
894,362
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Unfunded status at end of year
|
$
|
(330,766
|
)
|
$
|
(494,288
|
)
|
$
|
(135,595
|
)
|
$
|
(155,864
|
)
|
|||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Actuarial gains in 2013 and losses in 2012 in the Company's pension benefit plans resulted from changes in discount rate assumptions, primarily for the Company's U.S. plans. Changes in financial markets during 2013 and
2012
, including an increase and decrease, respectively, in corporate bond yield indices, resulted in a decrease and increase in benefit obligations, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
The increase in pension benefits paid in 2013 was primarily due the voluntary cash out program offered to vested, terminated U.S. pension plan participants in the first half of 2013. Pension plan assets were utilized to settle pension obligations for deferred participants that elected to participate in the program.
|
|
(3)
|
The decrease in return on plan assets in 2013 was primarily due to the increase in interest rates which resulted in lower returns on fixed income securities.
|
60
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, consist of the following:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Prepaid benefit cost
|
$
|
1,331
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Accrued benefit liability – current portion
|
(8,622
|
)
|
(8,217
|
)
|
(13,347
|
)
|
(14,906
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Accrued benefit liability – long-term portion
|
(323,475
|
)
|
(486,071
|
)
|
(122,248
|
)
|
(140,958
|
)
|
|||||||
|
$
|
(330,766
|
)
|
$
|
(494,288
|
)
|
$
|
(135,595
|
)
|
$
|
(155,864
|
)
|
||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net actuarial loss
|
$
|
(343,148
|
)
|
$
|
(493,487
|
)
|
$
|
(34,248
|
)
|
$
|
(51,644
|
)
|
|||
|
Net prior service benefit
|
666
|
|
708
|
|
—
|
|
493
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
(342,482
|
)
|
$
|
(492,779
|
)
|
$
|
(34,248
|
)
|
$
|
(51,151
|
)
|
||||
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit plans was
$1.2 billion
and
$1.4 billion
at
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, respectively. Information for the Company's defined benefit plans with an accumulated or projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is as follows:
|
Pension Benefits
|
|||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
|
|||||||
|
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation
|
$
|
1,147,938
|
|
$
|
1,335,827
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
827,764
|
|
859,373
|
|
|||
|
Projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
|
|||||||
|
Aggregate projected benefit obligation
|
$
|
1,195,923
|
|
$
|
1,388,650
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
863,826
|
|
894,362
|
|
|||
61
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The components of the Company's net periodic benefit cost (income) were as follows:
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$
|
8,707
|
|
$
|
8,952
|
|
$
|
10,241
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|||||
|
Interest cost
|
51,984
|
|
57,635
|
|
60,314
|
|
4,957
|
|
6,634
|
|
7,629
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(56,183
|
)
|
(52,029
|
)
|
(52,959
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Amortization of prior service (benefit) cost
(1)
|
(80
|
)
|
(78
|
)
|
47
|
|
(488
|
)
|
(16,356
|
)
|
(28,945
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
16,311
|
|
12,612
|
|
14,908
|
|
6,765
|
|
5,157
|
|
5,025
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Curtailment (gain) loss
|
(564
|
)
|
(2,391
|
)
|
129
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Special termination benefit
|
98
|
|
159
|
|
120
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Net settlement loss
|
517
|
|
383
|
|
714
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income)
|
20,790
|
|
25,243
|
|
33,514
|
|
11,610
|
|
(4,168
|
)
|
(15,813
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
(134,378
|
)
|
110,262
|
|
(10,626
|
)
|
10,408
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of prior service benefit
(1)
|
80
|
|
78
|
|
488
|
|
16,356
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
(16,311
|
)
|
(12,612
|
)
|
(6,765
|
)
|
(5,157
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Curtailment gain
|
498
|
|
192
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net settlement loss
|
(178
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(150,289
|
)
|
97,843
|
|
(16,903
|
)
|
21,607
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost (income) and accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(129,499
|
)
|
$
|
123,086
|
|
$
|
(5,293
|
)
|
$
|
17,439
|
|
|||||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Postretirement benefits amortization of prior service benefit recognized during each of years 2012 and 2011 relates primarily to the favorable impact of the February 2004 and August 2003 plan amendments, which concluded amortization in 2012.
|
The amounts that will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” into net periodic benefit cost in
2014
for the Company's defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans are expected to be
$10.8 million
and
$4.0 million
, respectively.
62
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Assumptions used in accounting for the Company's benefit plans were as follows:
|
Pension Benefits
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
|
|||||||
|
Discount rate
|
3.8%
|
4.9%
|
3.3%
|
4.5%
|
|||
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
6.4%
|
6.7%
|
|||||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.5%
|
3.6%
|
|||||
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:
|
|||||||
|
Discount rate
|
4.6%
|
3.8%
|
4.2%
|
3.3%
|
|||
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
3.7%
|
3.5%
|
|||||
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates were as follows:
|
|||||||
|
Health care trend rate assumed for next year
|
7.2%
|
7.4%
|
|||||
|
Rate trend to which the cost trend is assumed to decline
|
4.5%
|
4.5%
|
|||||
|
Year that rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
2028
|
2028
|
|||||
For the Company's U.S. benefit plans, the discount rate used to determine the present value of the future pension and postretirement plan obligations was based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate bonds with various maturities. Each year's expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate. The Company utilized a variety of country-specific third-party bond indices to determine the appropriate discount rates to use for the benefit plans of its foreign subsidiaries.
The Company bases the overall expected long-term rate of return on assets on anticipated long-term returns of individual asset classes and each pension plans' target asset allocation strategy based on current economic conditions. For the U.S. pension plan, the expected long-term returns for each asset class are determined through a mean-variance model to estimate
20
-year returns for the plan.
Health care cost trend rate assumptions are a significant input in the calculation of the amounts reported for the Company's postretirement benefits plans. A one percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have no significant effect on the total service and interest cost components or on the postretirement benefit obligation.
Consolidated pension plan assets relate primarily to the U.S. pension plan. The Company utilizes the services of independent third-party investment managers to oversee the management of U.S. pension plan assets. The Company's investment strategy is to invest plan assets in a diversified portfolio of domestic and international equity securities, fixed income securities and real estate and other alternative investments with the objective of generating long-term growth in plan assets at a reasonable level of risk. Prohibited investments for the U.S. pension plan include certain privately placed or other non-marketable debt instruments, letter stock, commodities or commodity contracts and derivatives of mortgage-backed securities, such as interest-only, principal-only or inverse floaters. The current target allocation percentages for the Company's U.S. pension plan assets are
34-38%
for equity securities,
54-58%
for fixed income securities and
6-10%
for other alternative investments, including real estate.
63
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The fair value of the Company's pension plan assets by asset class are as follows:
|
Year Ended November 24, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Asset Class
|
Total
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Equity securities
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
U.S. large cap
|
175,181
|
|
—
|
|
175,181
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
U.S. small cap
|
31,163
|
|
—
|
|
31,163
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
International
|
133,339
|
|
—
|
|
133,339
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Fixed income securities
(2)
|
490,701
|
|
—
|
|
490,701
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Other alternative investments
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Real estate
(3)
|
55,082
|
|
—
|
|
55,082
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Private equity
(4)
|
3,041
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,041
|
|
|||||||
|
Hedge fund
(5)
|
7,090
|
|
—
|
|
7,090
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Other
(6)
|
6,304
|
|
—
|
|
6,304
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Total investments at fair value
|
$
|
903,033
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
$
|
898,860
|
|
$
|
3,041
|
|
|||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Primarily comprised of equity index funds that track various market indices.
|
|
(2)
|
Predominantly includes bond index funds that invest in long-term U.S. government and investment grade corporate bonds.
|
|
(3)
|
Primarily comprised of investments in U.S. Real Estate Investment Trusts.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents holdings in a diversified portfolio of private equity funds and direct investments in companies located primarily in North America. Fair values are determined by investment fund managers using primarily unobservable market data.
|
|
(5)
|
Primarily invested in a diversified portfolio of equities, bonds, alternatives and cash with a low tolerance for capital loss.
|
|
(6)
|
Primarily relates to accounts held and managed by a third-party insurance company for employee-participants in Belgium. Fair values are based on accumulated plan contributions plus a contractually-guaranteed return plus a share of any incremental investment fund profits.
|
The fair value of plan assets are composed of U.S. plan assets of
$756.5 million
and non-U.S. plan assets of
$146.5 million
. The fair values of the substantial majority of the equity, fixed income and real estate investments are based on the net asset value of comingled trust funds that passively track various market indices.
The Company's estimated future benefit payments to participants, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate are anticipated to be paid as follows:
|
Fiscal year
|
Pension Benefits
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
|
2014
|
$
|
62,050
|
|
$
|
15,998
|
|
$
|
78,048
|
|
||||
|
2015
|
62,690
|
|
15,498
|
|
78,188
|
|
|||||||
|
2016
|
62,839
|
|
14,917
|
|
77,756
|
|
|||||||
|
2017
|
64,806
|
|
14,229
|
|
79,035
|
|
|||||||
|
2018
|
66,155
|
|
13,604
|
|
79,759
|
|
|||||||
|
2019-2023
|
361,014
|
|
61,270
|
|
422,284
|
|
|||||||
At
November 24, 2013
, the Company's contributions to its pension plans in
2014
were estimated to be approximately
$18.4 million
.
64
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
9
: EMPLOYEE INVESTMENT PLANS
The Company's Employee Savings and Investment Plan (“ESIP”) is a qualified plan that covers eligible home office employees. The Company matches
125%
of ESIP participant's contributions to all funds maintained under the qualified plan up to the first
6.0%
of eligible compensation. Total amounts charged to expense for the Company's employee investment plans for the years ended
November 24, 2013
,
November 25, 2012
, and
November 27, 2011
, were
$12.2 million
,
$11.0 million
and
$10.3 million
, respectively.
NOTE
10
: EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS
Annual Incentive Plan
The Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) provides a cash bonus that is earned based upon the Company's business unit and consolidated financial results as measured against pre-established internal targets and upon the performance and job level of the individual. Total amounts charged to expense for this plan for the years ended
November 24, 2013
,
November 25, 2012
, and
November 27, 2011
, were
$76.6 million
,
$54.6 million
and
$54.0 million
, respectively. As of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, the Company had accrued
$79.6 million
and
$57.2 million
, respectively, for the AIP.
Long-Term Incentive Plans
2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“EIP”).
In July 2006, the Board adopted, and the stockholders approved, the EIP. For more information on this plan, see Note
11
.
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”).
The Company established a long-term cash incentive plan effective at the beginning of 2005. Executive officers are not participants in this plan. Performance will be measured at the end of a
three
-year period based on the Company's performance over the period measured against the following pre-established targets: (i) the target compound annual growth rate in the Company's net revenues over the
three
-year period; and (ii) the target compound annual growth rate of the Company's net earnings adjusted for certain items such as interest and taxes for the
three
-year period. Beginning in 2013, the net earnings target measurement component will be determined at the end of a
three
-year period based on the Company's average margin of net earnings over the period adjusted for certain items such as interest and taxes. Individual target amounts are set for each participant based on job level. Awards will be paid out in the quarter following the end of the
three
-year period based on Company performance against objectives.
The Company recorded expense for the LTIP of
$2.8 million
for the year ended
November 24, 2013
, and a net reversal of expense for the LTIP of
$3.6 million
and
$2.5 million
for the years ended
November 25, 2012
, and
November 27, 2011
, respectively. As of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, the Company had accrued a total of
$2.9 million
and
$0.1 million
, respectively, for the LTIP.
NOTE
11
: STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of
$18.6 million
,
$5.1 million
and
$6.6 million
, and related income tax benefits of
$5.6 million
,
$2.0 million
and
$2.7 million
, respectively, for the years ended
November 24, 2013
,
November 25, 2012
and
November 27, 2011
, respectively. As of
November 24, 2013
, there was
$31.4 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested equity and liability awards, which cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.23
years.
No
stock-based compensation cost has been capitalized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
2006 Equity Incentive Plan
Under the Company's EIP, a variety of stock awards, including stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) may be granted. The EIP also provides for the grant of performance awards in the form of cash or equity. The aggregate number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the EIP is
700,000
shares. At
November 24, 2013
,
532,151
shares remained available for issuance.
65
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Under the EIP, stock awards have a maximum contractual term of
ten years
and generally must have an exercise price at least equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date the award is granted. The Company's common stock is not listed on any stock exchange. Accordingly, as provided by the EIP, the stock's fair market value is determined by the Board based upon a stock valuation performed by Evercore. Awards vest according to terms determined at the time of grant. Unvested stock awards are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment prior to vesting, but are subject in some cases to early vesting upon specified events, including certain corporate transactions as defined in the EIP or as otherwise determined by the Board in its discretion. Some stock awards are payable in either shares of the Company's common stock or cash at the discretion of the Board as determined at the time of grant.
Upon the exercise of a SAR, the participant will receive shares of common stock. The number of shares of common stock issued per SAR unit exercised is equal to (i) the excess of the per-share fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the SAR, divided by (ii) the per-share fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of exercise.
Only non-employee members of the Board have received RSUs. Each recipient's initial grant of RSUs is converted to a share of common stock
six months
after discontinuation of service with the Company for each fully vested RSU held at that date. Subsequent grants of RSUs provide recipients with the opportunity to make deferral elections regarding when the shares of the Company's common stock are to be delivered in settlement of vested RSUs. If the recipient does not elect to defer the receipt of common stock, then the RSUs are immediately converted to common stock upon vesting. The RSUs additionally have “dividend equivalent rights,” of which dividends paid by the Company on its common stock are credited by the equivalent addition of RSUs.
Shares of common stock will be issued from the Company's authorized but unissued shares and are subject to the Stockholders Agreement that governs all shares.
Put rights.
Prior to an initial public offering (“IPO”) of the Company's common stock, a participant (or estate or other beneficiary of a deceased participant) may require the Company to repurchase shares of the common stock held by the participant at then-current fair market value (a “put right”). Put rights may be exercised only with respect to shares of the Company's common stock that have been held by a participant for at least
six months
following their issuance date, thus exposing the holder to the risk and rewards of ownership for a reasonable period of time. Accordingly, the SARs and RSUs are classified as equity awards, and are reported in “Stockholders' equity (deficit)” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Call rights.
Prior to an IPO, the Company also has the right to repurchase shares of its common stock held by a participant (or estate or other beneficiary of a deceased participant, or other permitted transferee) at then-current fair market value (a “call right”). Call rights apply to an award as well as any shares of common stock acquired pursuant to the award. If the award or common stock is transferred to another person, that person is subject to the call right. As with the put rights, call rights may be exercised only with respect to shares of common stock that have been held by a participant for at least
six months
following their issuance date.
Temporary equity.
Equity-classified stock-based awards that may be settled in cash at the option of the holder are presented on the balance sheet outside permanent equity. Accordingly, “Temporary equity” on the face of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets includes the portion of the intrinsic value of these awards generally relating to the elapsed service period since the grant date as well as the fair value of common stock issued pursuant to the EIP. The increase in temporary equity from the year ended
November 25, 2012
, to
November 24, 2013
, was primarily due to an increase in the fair value of the Company's common stock.
66
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Equity Awards
SARs.
The Company grants SARs, which include service or performance conditions, to a small group of the Company's senior executives. Beginning in 2013, the Company issued cliff vesting performance awards ("performance-based SARs") to align with the achievement of
three
-year financial performance goals. SARs activity during the years ended
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, was as follows:
|
Service SARs
|
Performance-based SARs
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Units
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
|
Units
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Units in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at November 27, 2011
|
2,021
|
|
$
|
40.52
|
|
3.9
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
1,438
|
|
32.09
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(271
|
)
|
24.93
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(387
|
)
|
35.78
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Expired
|
(264
|
)
|
43.49
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at November 25, 2012
|
2,537
|
|
$
|
37.82
|
|
4.5
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
672
|
|
40.21
|
|
672
|
|
$
|
40.21
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(380
|
)
|
35.91
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(79
|
)
|
35.07
|
|
(28
|
)
|
37.75
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Expired
|
(737
|
)
|
47.59
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at November 24, 2013
|
2,013
|
|
$
|
35.51
|
|
5.5
|
644
|
|
|
$
|
40.32
|
|
6.3
|
||||||||
|
Vested and expected to vest at November 24, 2013
|
1,893
|
|
$
|
35.36
|
|
5.4
|
478
|
|
$
|
40.32
|
|
6.3
|
|||||||||
|
Exercisable at November 24, 2013
|
718
|
|
$
|
34.02
|
|
4.9
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||
SARs with service conditions ("service SARs") vest from two-and-a-half to four years, and have maximum contractual lives ranging from six-and-a-half to ten years. The performance-based SARs vest at varying unit amounts based on the attainment of certain
three
-year cumulative performance goals and have maximum contractual lives of
seven
years. In addition, approximately one-third of the performance-based SARs granted and outstanding also require the attainment of a specified common stock value as of the end of the
three
-year performance period in order to vest. The total intrinsic value of service SARs exercised during the year ended
November 24, 2013
, was
$7.7 million
. The total fair value of service SARs vested as of
November 24, 2013
, was
$20.8 million
. Unrecognized future compensation costs as of
November 24, 2013
, of
$12.2 million
for service SARs and
$4.4 million
for performance-based SARs are expected to be recognized over weighted-average periods of
2.61
years and
2.17
years, respectively. The Company believes it is probable that the performance-based SARs will vest.
67
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The weighted-average grant date fair value of SARs was estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The weighted-average grant date fair values and corresponding weighted-average assumptions used in the model were as follows:
|
Service SARs Granted
|
Performance-based SARs Granted
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2013
|
||||||||||||||
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value
|
$
|
12.21
|
|
$
|
10.96
|
|
$
|
16.08
|
|
$
|
12.54
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Expected life (in years)
|
4.6
|
|
4.5
|
|
4.6
|
|
5.0
|
|
|||||||||
|
Expected volatility
|
43.2
|
%
|
47.1
|
%
|
46.9
|
%
|
42.6
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.8
|
%
|
0.6
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Expected dividend
|
1.7
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
1.2
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
|||||||||
RSUs
. The Company grants RSUs to certain members of its Board. RSU activity during the years ended
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, was as follows:
|
Units
|
Weighted-Average Fair Value
|
|||||||||
|
(Units in thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
Outstanding at November 27, 2011
|
60
|
|
$
|
38.61
|
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
34
|
|
32.90
|
|
||||||
|
Converted
|
(22
|
)
|
31.13
|
|
||||||
|
Outstanding at November 25, 2012
|
72
|
|
$
|
38.11
|
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
26
|
|
56.79
|
|
||||||
|
Converted
|
(23
|
)
|
37.37
|
|
||||||
|
Outstanding, vested and expected to vest at November 24, 2013
|
75
|
|
$
|
44.66
|
|
|||||
The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs was estimated using the Evercore stock valuation. The total fair value of RSUs outstanding, vested and expected to vest as of
November 24, 2013
, was
$4.7 million
.
RSUs vest in a series of three equal installments at thirteen months, twenty-four months and thirty-six months following the date of grant. However, if the recipient's continuous service terminates for a reason other than cause after the first vesting installment, but prior to full vesting, then the remaining unvested portion of the award becomes fully vested as of the date of such termination.
68
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Liability Awards
Cash settled liability awards provide long-term incentive compensation for select levels of the Company’s management. The common stock values used in the determination of the cash settled awards and payouts are approved by the Board based on the Evercore stock valuation. Unvested awards are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment, but are subject in some cases to early vesting upon specified events, as defined in the agreement. From 2008 through 2012, the Company's Total Shareholder Return Plan (“TSRP”) provided grants of units that vest over a three-year performance period. Upon vesting of a TSRP unit, the participant will receive a cash payout in an amount equal to the excess of the per share value of the Company's common stock at the end of the
three
-year performance period over the per-share value at the date of grant. In 2013, the Company replaced the TSRP with the Phantom Restricted Stock Unit Plan (“PRSU”). The PRSU provides for grants of units, with actual number of units vesting subject to a minimum and maximum, based on the fair value of the common stock at the end of a three-year performance period. Upon vesting of a PSRU unit, the participant will receive a cash payout in an amount equal to the vested units multiplied by the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the end of the
three
-year performance period. Unrecognized future compensation cost as of
November 24, 2013
of
$2.0 million
for TSRPs and
$12.8 million
for PRSUs are expected to be recognized over weighted-average periods of
one
year and
2.08
years, respectively. The Company believes it is probable that the liability awards will vest.
Liability award activity during the years ended
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, was as follows:
|
TSRPs
|
PRSUs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Units
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average Fair Value At Period End
|
Units
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average Fair Value At Period End
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Units in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at November 27, 2011
|
1,169
|
|
$
|
34.09
|
|
$
|
6.59
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
389
|
|
32.09
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(437
|
)
|
24.84
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(289
|
)
|
37.46
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at November 25, 2012
|
832
|
|
$
|
36.83
|
|
$
|
4.22
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
398
|
|
$
|
38.19
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(252
|
)
|
36.36
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performance Adjustment of PRSU
|
66
|
|
37.75
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(164
|
)
|
37.23
|
|
(60
|
)
|
37.75
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at November 24, 2013
|
416
|
|
$
|
36.96
|
|
$
|
25.42
|
|
404
|
|
$
|
38.19
|
|
$
|
62.75
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Vested and expected to vest at November 24, 2013
|
373
|
|
$
|
37.52
|
|
$
|
24.90
|
|
267
|
|
$
|
38.19
|
|
$
|
62.75
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Exercisable at November 24, 2013
|
191
|
|
$
|
42.70
|
|
$
|
19.98
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
69
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The total intrinsic value of TSRPs exercised during the year ended
November 25, 2012
, was
$3.1 million
. The total fair value of TSRPs vested as of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 27, 2011
, was
$3.8 million
and
$3.7 million
, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of TSRPs at
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, was estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The weighted-average fair value of PRSUs at the grant date was estimated using the Evercore stock valuation while the PRSUs fair value at
November 24, 2013
is estimated using an internal calculation consistent with Evercore’s calculation. The weighted-average assumptions used in the TSRPs Black-Scholes model were as follows:
|
TSRPs Outstanding at
|
|||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
||||||||||
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
|
|||||||||||
|
Expected life (in years)
|
0.6
|
|
1.2
|
|
|||||||
|
Expected volatility
|
30.8
|
%
|
38.3
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.1
|
%
|
0.2
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Expected dividend
|
1.1
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
|||||||
NOTE
12
: LONG-TERM EMPLOYEE RELATED BENEFITS
Long-term employee-related benefit liabilities primarily consist of the Company's liabilities for its deferred compensation plans.
Deferred compensation plan for executives and outside directors, established
January 1, 2003.
The Company has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for executives and outside directors that was established on January 1, 2003 and amended thereafter. The deferred compensation plan obligations are payable in cash upon retirement, termination of employment and/or certain other times in a lump-sum distribution or in installments, as elected by the participant in accordance with the plan. As of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, these plan liabilities totaled
$22.2 million
and
$18.7 million
, respectively, of which
$1.4 million
and
$1.1 million
was included in “Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits” as of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, respectively. The Company held funds of approximately
$23.8 million
and
$20.3 million
in an irrevocable grantor's rabbi trust as of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, respectively, related to this plan. Rabbi trust assets are included in “Other current assets” or “Other non-current assets” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Deferred compensation plan for executives, prior to January 1, 2003.
The Company also maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain management employees relating to compensation deferrals for the period prior to January 1, 2003. The rabbi trust is not a feature of this plan. As of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, liabilities for this plan totaled
$41.1 million
and
$41.6 million
, respectively, of which
$6.0 million
and
$5.5 million
, respectively, was included in “Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Interest earned by the participants in deferred compensation plans was
$8.7 million
,
$6.8 million
and
$0.7 million
for the years ended
November 24, 2013
,
November 25, 2012
, and
November 27, 2011
, respectively. The charges were included in “Interest expense” in the Company's consolidated statements of income.
70
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
13
: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Lease Commitments
The Company is obligated under operating leases for manufacturing, finishing and distribution facilities, office space, retail stores and equipment. At
November 24, 2013
, obligations for future minimum payments under operating leases were as follows:
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||
|
2014
|
$
|
154,476
|
|
||||
|
2015
|
123,417
|
|
|||||
|
2016
|
96,947
|
|
|||||
|
2017
|
77,408
|
|
|||||
|
2018
|
59,687
|
|
|||||
|
Thereafter
|
137,162
|
|
|||||
|
Total future minimum lease payments
|
$
|
649,097
|
|
||||
In general, leases relating to real estate include renewal options of up to approximately
14 years
, except for the San Francisco headquarters office lease, which contains multiple renewal options of up to
57 years
. Some leases contain escalation clauses relating to increases in operating costs. Rental expense for the years ended
November 24, 2013
,
November 25, 2012
, and
November 27, 2011
, was
$194.5 million
,
$186.1 million
and
$174.6 million
, respectively.
Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts
The Company uses over-the-counter derivative instruments to manage its exposure to foreign currencies. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the forward foreign exchange contracts. However, the Company believes that its exposures are appropriately diversified across counterparties and that these counterparties are creditworthy financial institutions. Please see Note
5
for additional information.
Other Contingencies
Litigation.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has various pending cases involving contractual matters, facility and employee-related matters, distribution matters, product liability claims, trademark infringement and other matters. The Company does not believe any of these pending legal proceedings will have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE
14
: DIVIDEND PAYMENT
The Company paid a cash dividend of
$25.1 million
on our common stock in the first quarter of
2013
, and cash dividends of
$20.0 million
in the first half of each of
2012
and
2011
. Subsequent to the Company's year-end, the Company's Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of
$30.0 million
.
The Company does not have an established annual dividend policy. The Company will continue to review its ability to pay cash dividends at least annually, and dividends may be declared at the discretion of the Board depending upon, among other factors, the income tax impact to the dividend recipients, the Company's financial condition and compliance with the terms of the Company's debt agreements.
71
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
15
: ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is summarized below:
|
Levi Strauss & Co.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
|
Translation Adjustments
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Investment Hedges
|
Foreign Currency Translation
|
Total
|
Noncontrolling Interest
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at November 28, 2010
|
$
|
(198,807
|
)
|
$
|
(26,389
|
)
|
$
|
(47,129
|
)
|
$
|
157
|
|
$
|
(272,168
|
)
|
$
|
10,075
|
|
$
|
(262,093
|
)
|
||||||
|
Gross changes
|
(92,480
|
)
|
(3,758
|
)
|
(10,881
|
)
|
(1,149
|
)
|
(108,268
|
)
|
794
|
|
(107,474
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax
|
35,603
|
|
1,454
|
|
(3,068
|
)
|
445
|
|
34,434
|
|
—
|
|
34,434
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
(56,877
|
)
|
(2,304
|
)
|
(13,949
|
)
|
(704
|
)
|
(73,834
|
)
|
794
|
|
(73,040
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at November 27, 2011
|
(255,684
|
)
|
(28,693
|
)
|
(61,078
|
)
|
(547
|
)
|
(346,002
|
)
|
10,869
|
|
(335,133
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Gross changes
|
(119,450
|
)
|
16,070
|
|
(4,755
|
)
|
2,549
|
|
(105,586
|
)
|
(457
|
)
|
(106,043
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax
|
44,173
|
|
(6,230
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(988
|
)
|
36,953
|
|
—
|
|
36,953
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
(75,277
|
)
|
9,840
|
|
(4,757
|
)
|
1,561
|
|
(68,633
|
)
|
(457
|
)
|
(69,090
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at November 25, 2012
|
(330,961
|
)
|
(18,853
|
)
|
(65,835
|
)
|
1,014
|
|
(414,635
|
)
|
10,412
|
|
(404,223
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Gross changes
|
167,192
|
|
(12,786
|
)
|
4,797
|
|
411
|
|
159,614
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
158,568
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Tax
|
(63,003
|
)
|
4,940
|
|
1,214
|
|
(159
|
)
|
(57,008
|
)
|
—
|
|
(57,008
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
104,189
|
|
(7,846
|
)
|
6,011
|
|
252
|
|
102,606
|
|
(1,046
|
)
|
101,560
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at November 24, 2013
|
$
|
(226,772
|
)
|
$
|
(26,699
|
)
|
$
|
(59,824
|
)
|
$
|
1,266
|
|
$
|
(312,029
|
)
|
$
|
9,366
|
|
$
|
(302,663
|
)
|
||||||
No amounts were reclassified out of "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" into net income other than those that pertain to the Company's pension and postretirement benefit plans. Please see Note
8
for additional information. These amounts are included in "Selling, general and administrative expenses" in the consolidated statements of income.
72
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
16
: OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
The following table summarizes significant components of “Other income (expense), net”:
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange management (losses) gains
(1)
|
$
|
(539
|
)
|
$
|
(9,444
|
)
|
$
|
15,310
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains
(2)
|
(21,697
|
)
|
8,512
|
|
(20,251
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Interest income
|
1,600
|
|
1,514
|
|
1,618
|
|
|||||||
|
Investment Income
|
3,019
|
|
525
|
|
863
|
|
|||||||
|
Other
|
4,436
|
|
3,695
|
|
1,185
|
|
|||||||
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
$
|
(13,181
|
)
|
$
|
4,802
|
|
$
|
(1,275
|
)
|
||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Gains and losses on forward foreign exchange contracts primarily result from currency fluctuations relative to negotiated contract rates. Losses in
2013
were primarily due to unfavorable currency fluctuations against the U.S. Dollar relative to negotiated contract rates. Losses in
2012
primarily resulted from unfavorable currency fluctuations relative to negotiated contract rates on positions to sell the Mexican Peso.
|
|
(2)
|
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses reflect the impact of foreign currency fluctuation on the Company's foreign currency denominated balances. Losses in
2013
were primarily due to the weakening of various currencies against the U.S. Dollar. Gains in
2012
were primarily due to a significant increase in Euro denominated intercompany receivables and the appreciation of the U.S. Dollar against the Japanese Yen.
|
NOTE
17
: INCOME TAXES
The Company's income tax expense was
$94.5 million
,
$54.9 million
and
$67.7 million
for the years
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively. The Company's effective income tax rate was
29.3%
,
28.0%
, and
33.4%
for
2013
,
2012
and
2011
, respectively.
The increase in income tax expense in
2013
as compared to
2012
is primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income. The effective tax rate in 2013 reflects a
$15.2 million
discrete tax benefit attributable to the finalization in July 2013 of the U.S. federal tax audit of tax years 2003 – 2008, and a beneficial change in the impact of foreign operations as compared to 2012.
The decrease in income tax expense and effective tax rate in 2012 as compared to 2011 is primarily due to a net tax benefit of
$27.0 million
recognized in 2012, resulting from a definitive agreement with the State of California on state tax refund claims involving tax years 1986 – 2004.
The Company's income tax expense differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of
35%
to income before income taxes as follows:
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
November 27, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Income tax expense at U.S. federal statutory rate
|
$
|
112,914
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
$
|
68,558
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
$
|
70,990
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
||
|
State income taxes, net of U.S. federal impact
|
3,994
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
892
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
1,535
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|||||
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
5,169
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
(1,329
|
)
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
(2,421
|
)
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Impact of foreign operations
|
(17,160
|
)
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
7,313
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
(2,148
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Reassessment of tax liabilities
|
(15,215
|
)
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
(29,500
|
)
|
(15.1
|
)%
|
(51
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of deferred tax assets
|
4,289
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
9,061
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other, including non-deductible expenses
|
486
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
(73
|
)
|
—
|
|
(190
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
94,477
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
$
|
54,922
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
$
|
67,715
|
|
33.4
|
%
|
||
73
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Impact of foreign operations.
The
$17.2 million
benefit in 2013 is primarily due to an increase in the proportion of 2013 earnings in foreign jurisdictions where the Company is subject to lower tax rates, as well as a reduction, as a percentage of pre-tax profits, in the proportion of losses in jurisdictions where the Company cannot record a tax benefit.
Reassessment of tax liabilities.
In 2013, the
$15.2 million
tax benefit primarily relates to the finalization of the U.S. federal tax audit for tax years 2003 – 2008. In 2012, the
$29.5 million
tax benefit was primarily attributable to the net tax benefit recognized in 2012 resulting from a definitive agreement with the State of California on the state tax refund claims involving tax years 1986 – 2004.
The U.S. and foreign components of income before income taxes were as follows:
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
November 27, 2011
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Domestic
|
$
|
86,167
|
|
$
|
82,764
|
|
$
|
114,236
|
|
||||
|
Foreign
|
236,446
|
|
113,117
|
|
88,591
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Income before Income Taxes
|
$
|
322,613
|
|
$
|
195,881
|
|
$
|
202,827
|
|
||||
Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following:
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
November 27, 2011
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
|
U.S. Federal
|
|||||||||||||
|
Current
|
$
|
11,294
|
|
$
|
15,334
|
|
$
|
19,992
|
|
||||
|
Deferred
|
20,597
|
|
29,537
|
|
40,435
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
31,891
|
|
$
|
44,871
|
|
$
|
60,427
|
|
|||||
|
U.S. State
|
|||||||||||||
|
Current
|
$
|
3,732
|
|
$
|
(34,603
|
)
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
||||
|
Deferred
|
3,607
|
|
(2,956
|
)
|
(617
|
)
|
|||||||
|
$
|
7,339
|
|
$
|
(37,559
|
)
|
$
|
(627
|
)
|
|||||
|
Foreign
|
|||||||||||||
|
Current
|
$
|
41,931
|
|
$
|
54,338
|
|
$
|
31,580
|
|
||||
|
Deferred
|
13,316
|
|
(6,728
|
)
|
(23,665
|
)
|
|||||||
|
$
|
55,247
|
|
$
|
47,610
|
|
$
|
7,915
|
|
|||||
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
|
Current
|
$
|
56,957
|
|
$
|
35,069
|
|
$
|
51,562
|
|
||||
|
Deferred
|
37,520
|
|
19,853
|
|
16,153
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Income Tax Expense
|
$
|
94,477
|
|
$
|
54,922
|
|
$
|
67,715
|
|
||||
74
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
The Company's deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
|
$
|
176,222
|
|
$
|
180,890
|
|
|||
|
State net operating loss carryforwards
|
15,587
|
|
13,030
|
|
|||||
|
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards
|
95,542
|
|
82,748
|
|
|||||
|
Employee compensation and benefit plans
|
240,198
|
|
300,796
|
|
|||||
|
Advance royalties
|
55,581
|
|
82,799
|
|
|||||
|
Restructuring and special charges
|
21,474
|
|
29,031
|
|
|||||
|
Sales returns and allowances
|
31,706
|
|
33,372
|
|
|||||
|
Inventory
|
16,469
|
|
14,261
|
|
|||||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
21,426
|
|
18,504
|
|
|||||
|
Unrealized gains/losses on investments
|
7,971
|
|
9,720
|
|
|||||
|
Other
|
51,645
|
|
38,445
|
|
|||||
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
733,821
|
|
803,596
|
|
|||||
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
(96,026
|
)
|
(74,456
|
)
|
|||||
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
637,795
|
|
729,140
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|||||||||
|
Unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries
|
(3,690
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(3,690
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Total net deferred tax assets
|
$
|
634,105
|
|
$
|
729,140
|
|
|||
|
Current
|
|||||||||
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
$
|
196,581
|
|
$
|
125,804
|
|
|||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(9,503
|
)
|
(9,580
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total current net deferred tax assets
|
$
|
187,078
|
|
$
|
116,224
|
|
|||
|
Long-term
|
|||||||||
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
$
|
533,550
|
|
$
|
677,792
|
|
|||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(86,523
|
)
|
(64,876
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total long-term net deferred tax assets
|
$
|
447,027
|
|
$
|
612,916
|
|
|||
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
. The foreign tax credit carryforwards at November 24, 2013, are subject to expiration through 2023 if not utilized, including
$11.8 million
in 2014.
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards.
As of
November 24, 2013
, the Company had a deferred tax asset of
$95.5 million
for foreign net operating loss carryforwards of
$327.1 million
. Approximately
$141.9 million
of these operating losses are subject to expiration through 2032 if not utilized, including
$2.8 million
in 2014. The remaining
$185.2 million
are available as indefinite carryforwards under applicable tax law.
75
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
Valuation Allowance.
The following table details the changes in valuation allowance during the year ended
November 24, 2013
:
|
Valuation Allowance at November 25, 2012
|
Changes in Related Gross Deferred Tax Asset
|
Charge
|
Valuation Allowance at November 24, 2013
|
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,824
|
|
$
|
3,824
|
|
||||
|
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards and other foreign deferred tax assets
|
74,456
|
|
16,401
|
|
1,345
|
|
92,202
|
|
||||||||
|
$
|
74,456
|
|
$
|
16,401
|
|
$
|
5,169
|
|
$
|
96,026
|
|
|||||
At
November 24, 2013
, the Company's valuation allowance primarily related to its gross deferred tax assets for state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards, to reduce the assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized.
Unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries.
As of November 24, 2013, the Company had a
$3.7 million
deferred tax liability for foreign earnings which the Company does not currently intend to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States.
Uncertain Income Tax Positions
As of
November 24, 2013
, the Company’s total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was
$37.8 million
, of which
$19.2 million
could impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, as compared to
November 25, 2012
, when the Company’s total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was
$63.6 million
, of which
$38.5 million
could have impacted the effective tax rate, if recognized. The reduction in gross unrecognized tax benefits was primarily due the finalization of the U.S. federal tax audit of tax years 2003 – 2008 and the lapse of statute of limitations of various foreign jurisdictions. The following table reflects the changes to the Company's unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
:
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits beginning balance
|
$
|
63,626
|
|
$
|
143,397
|
|
||||
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
2,839
|
|
5,216
|
|
||||||
|
Increases related to tax positions from prior years
|
1,650
|
|
3,018
|
|
||||||
|
Decreases related to tax positions from prior years
|
—
|
|
(97
|
)
|
||||||
|
Settlement with tax authorities
|
(23,380
|
)
|
(83,852
|
)
|
||||||
|
Lapses of statutes of limitation
|
(7,026
|
)
|
(3,126
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other, including foreign currency translation
|
127
|
|
(930
|
)
|
||||||
|
Unrecognized tax benefits ending balance
|
$
|
37,836
|
|
$
|
63,626
|
|
||||
The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could decrease within the next twelve months by as much as
$3.9 million
due to anticipated settlement of audits in various jurisdictions.
As of
November 24, 2013
, and
November 25, 2012
, accrued interest and penalties primarily relating to non-U.S. jurisdictions were
$11.8 million
and
$15.6 million
, respectively.
76
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
The Company's income tax returns are subject to examination in the U.S. federal and state jurisdictions and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The following table summarizes the tax years that are either currently under audit or remain open and subject to examination by the tax authorities in the major jurisdictions in which the Company operates:
|
Jurisdiction
|
Open Tax Years
|
||
|
U.S. federal
|
2007 – 2013
|
||
|
California
|
2003 – 2013
|
||
|
Belgium
|
2010 – 2013
|
||
|
United Kingdom
|
2008 – 2013
|
||
|
Spain
|
2008 – 2013
|
||
|
Mexico
|
2007 – 2013
|
||
|
Canada
|
2004 – 2013
|
||
|
Hong Kong
|
2007 – 2013
|
||
|
Italy
|
2008 – 2013
|
||
|
France
|
2010 – 2012
|
||
|
Turkey
|
2008 – 2013
|
||
NOTE
18
: RELATED PARTIES
Robert D. Haas, a director and Chairman Emeritus of the Company, is the President of the Levi Strauss Foundation, which is not a consolidated entity of the Company. During
2013
,
2012
, and
2011
, the Company donated
$4.2 million
,
$2.8 million
and
$1.6 million
, respectively, to the Levi Strauss Foundation.
Peter E. Haas Jr., a director of the Company, is the President of the Red Tab Foundation, which is not a consolidated entity of the Company. During
2013
and
2012
, the Company donated
$0.1 million
in both periods to the Red Tab Foundation.
77
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
19
: BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company manages its business according to
three
regional segments: the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. The Company considers its chief executive officer to be the Company’s chief operating decision maker. The Company’s management, including the chief operating decision maker, manages business operations, evaluates performance and allocates resources based on the regional segments’ net revenues and operating income. The Company reports net trade receivables and inventories by segment as that information is used by the chief operating decision maker in assessing segment performance. The Company does not report its other assets by segment as that information is not used by the chief operating decision maker in assessing segment performance.
Business segment information for the Company is as follows:
|
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
|
November 24,
2013 |
November 25,
2012 |
November 27,
2011 |
||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
$
|
2,851,037
|
|
$
|
2,749,327
|
|
$
|
2,715,925
|
|
||||
|
Europe
|
1,103,487
|
|
1,103,212
|
|
1,174,138
|
|
|||||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
727,167
|
|
757,654
|
|
871,503
|
|
|||||||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
4,681,691
|
|
$
|
4,610,193
|
|
$
|
4,761,566
|
|
||||
|
Operating income:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
$
|
510,496
|
|
$
|
431,552
|
|
$
|
393,906
|
|
||||
|
Europe
|
167,605
|
|
178,313
|
|
182,306
|
|
|||||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
123,723
|
|
66,839
|
|
108,065
|
|
|||||||
|
Regional operating income
|
801,824
|
|
676,704
|
|
684,277
|
|
|||||||
|
Corporate expenses
(1)
|
336,317
|
|
342,725
|
|
347,884
|
|
|||||||
|
Total operating income
|
465,507
|
|
333,979
|
|
336,393
|
|
|||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(129,024
|
)
|
(134,694
|
)
|
(132,043
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(689
|
)
|
(8,206
|
)
|
(248
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
(13,181
|
)
|
4,802
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
322,613
|
|
$
|
195,881
|
|
$
|
202,827
|
|
||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Included in corporate expenses for the year ended November 25, 2012, is an
$18.8 million
impairment charge related to the Company's decision in the third quarter of 2012 to outsource distribution in Japan to a third-party and close its owned distribution center in that country.
|
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
November 27, 2011
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization expense:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
$
|
37,520
|
|
$
|
43,368
|
|
$
|
53,804
|
|
||||
|
Europe
|
20,597
|
|
21,891
|
|
23,803
|
|
|||||||
|
Asia Pacific
|
9,422
|
|
12,887
|
|
12,878
|
|
|||||||
|
Corporate
|
48,181
|
|
44,462
|
|
27,308
|
|
|||||||
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense
|
$
|
115,720
|
|
$
|
122,608
|
|
$
|
117,793
|
|
||||
78
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
|
November 24, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
Europe
|
Asia Pacific
|
Unallocated
|
Consolidated Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trade receivables, net
|
$
|
288,360
|
|
$
|
101,010
|
|
$
|
40,520
|
|
$
|
16,781
|
|
$
|
446,671
|
|
||||||
|
Inventories
|
338,849
|
|
117,442
|
|
113,212
|
|
34,364
|
|
603,867
|
|
|||||||||||
|
All other assets
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,076,880
|
|
2,076,880
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,127,418
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
November 25, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Americas
|
Europe
|
Asia Pacific
|
Unallocated
|
Consolidated Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trade receivables, net
|
$
|
327,308
|
|
$
|
113,405
|
|
$
|
40,996
|
|
$
|
18,963
|
|
$
|
500,672
|
|
||||||
|
Inventories
|
270,019
|
|
126,018
|
|
96,969
|
|
25,854
|
|
518,860
|
|
|||||||||||
|
All other assets
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,150,545
|
|
2,150,545
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,170,077
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Geographic information for the Company was as follows:
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
November 27, 2011
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
2,497,756
|
|
$
|
2,412,647
|
|
$
|
2,380,096
|
|
||||
|
Foreign countries
|
2,183,935
|
|
2,197,546
|
|
2,381,470
|
|
|||||||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
4,681,691
|
|
$
|
4,610,193
|
|
$
|
4,761,566
|
|
||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
567,984
|
|
$
|
647,767
|
|
$
|
643,767
|
|
||||
|
Foreign countries
|
66,121
|
|
81,373
|
|
68,938
|
|
|||||||
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
$
|
634,105
|
|
$
|
729,140
|
|
$
|
712,705
|
|
||||
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|||||||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
346,533
|
|
$
|
353,567
|
|
$
|
365,907
|
|
||||
|
Foreign countries
|
110,387
|
|
123,977
|
|
152,874
|
|
|||||||
|
Total long-lived assets
|
$
|
456,920
|
|
$
|
477,544
|
|
$
|
518,781
|
|
||||
79
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2013, NOVEMBER 25, 2012, AND NOVEMBER 27, 2011
NOTE
20
: QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Set forth below are the consolidated statements of operations for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of
2013
and
2012
.
|
Year Ended November 24, 2013
|
First
Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
1,146,678
|
|
$
|
1,098,898
|
|
$
|
1,141,284
|
|
$
|
1,294,831
|
|
|||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
554,800
|
|
550,187
|
|
568,448
|
|
657,784
|
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit
|
591,878
|
|
548,711
|
|
572,836
|
|
637,047
|
|
|||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
410,423
|
|
449,074
|
|
454,750
|
|
570,718
|
|
|||||||
|
Operating income
|
181,455
|
|
99,637
|
|
118,086
|
|
66,329
|
|
|||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(32,157
|
)
|
(32,883
|
)
|
(30,903
|
)
|
(33,081
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
(114
|
)
|
(575
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
6,066
|
|
(830
|
)
|
(10,661
|
)
|
(7,756
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Income before taxes
|
155,250
|
|
65,349
|
|
76,522
|
|
25,492
|
|
|||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
48,375
|
|
17,140
|
|
20,077
|
|
8,885
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
106,875
|
|
48,209
|
|
56,445
|
|
16,607
|
|
|||||||
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
145
|
|
(60
|
)
|
630
|
|
342
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income attributable to Levi Strauss & Co.
|
$
|
107,020
|
|
$
|
48,149
|
|
$
|
57,075
|
|
$
|
16,949
|
|
|||
|
Year Ended November 25, 2012
|
First
Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
1,164,961
|
|
$
|
1,047,157
|
|
$
|
1,100,856
|
|
$
|
1,297,219
|
|
|||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
616,167
|
|
566,471
|
|
580,108
|
|
648,116
|
|
|||||||
|
Gross profit
|
548,794
|
|
480,686
|
|
520,748
|
|
649,103
|
|
|||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
438,583
|
|
435,056
|
|
433,961
|
|
557,752
|
|
|||||||
|
Operating income
|
110,211
|
|
45,630
|
|
86,787
|
|
91,351
|
|
|||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(38,573
|
)
|
(32,411
|
)
|
(32,160
|
)
|
(31,550
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
(8,206
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Other income (expense), net
|
1,172
|
|
10,697
|
|
(5,747
|
)
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Income before taxes
|
72,810
|
|
15,710
|
|
48,880
|
|
58,481
|
|
|||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
23,513
|
|
2,467
|
|
23,802
|
|
5,140
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
49,297
|
|
13,243
|
|
25,078
|
|
53,341
|
|
|||||||
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(79
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
3,273
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net income attributable to Levi Strauss & Co.
|
$
|
49,218
|
|
$
|
13,233
|
|
$
|
28,351
|
|
$
|
53,048
|
|
|||
80
|
Item 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
Item 9A.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit to the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
November 24, 2013
. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that as of
November 24, 2013
, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting
We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that our books and records accurately reflect our transactions and that our established policies and procedures are followed. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
November 24, 2013
. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework
.
Changes in internal controls
We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that our books and records accurately reflect our transactions and that our established policies and procedures are followed. There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
Item 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
Election of Class II Director
On February 5, 2014, our Board of Directors ("Board") elected Miriam L. Haas as a member of the Board, effective as of April 4, 2014. Mrs. Haas will serve as a Class II director and has been appointed to serve as a member of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship and Finance Committees of the Board. Mrs. Haas will receive compensation as a non-employee director in accordance with our non-employee director compensation practices described under the heading “Director Compensation” in Item 11 herein.
There is no understanding or arrangement between Mrs. Haas and any other person or persons with respect to her election as director. Mrs. Haas is the stepmother of Peter E. Haas Jr., who is a current member of the Board. There are no other family relationships between Mrs. Haas and any other director, aside from Peter E. Haas, Jr., or executive officer or person nominated or chosen by the Company to become a director or executive officer. Mrs. Haas will be a party to our standard form Director Indemnification Agreement. There have been no transactions, nor are there any currently proposed transactions, to which the Company was or is to be a party in which Mrs. Haas or any member of her immediate family had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest.
81
Approval of Omnibus Annual Incentive Plan and 2014 Annual Incentives to Named Executive Officers
On February 5, 2014, our Board adopted the Levi Strauss & Co. Annual Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus AIP”). The Omnibus AIP provides for annual incentives to our employees, including our named executive officers. The Human Resources Committee (the "HR Committee") administers the Omnibus AIP, determines which employees are eligible to participate under the plan and may delegate its authority under the plan. Awards under the plan are paid based on achievement of Company performance goals and/or the participant’s individual performance goals established by the HR Committee. These goals may directly determine the amount of a participant’s payout or the Company performance goals may establish an incentive pool for the Company or the participant’s business or similar unit to be allocated to the participant based on individual performance, the performance of the participant’s business or similar unit and/or other factors, each in accordance with rules established by the HR Committee. The maximum amount that can be paid under the plan to any participant with respect to any fiscal year is $10,000,000. Except as otherwise determined by the HR Committee, a participant must be in active employment on the date the participant’s award is paid in order to be entitled to receive payment. The HR Committee may utilize one or more of the following Company performance goals under the plan: (a) comparable store sales growth; (b) earnings; (c) earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT"); (d) earnings per share; (e) return on equity; (f) return on net assets; (g) return on invested capital; (h) gross sales; (i) net sales; (j) net earnings; (k) free cash flow; (l) total shareholder return; (m) stock price; (n) gross margin; (o) operating margin; (p) market share; (q) inventory levels or inventory turn; (r) cost reduction or containment; (s) customer satisfaction; (t) employee turnover or satisfaction; (u) sales per square foot or sales per employee; (v) working capital; (w) revenue or net revenue; and (x) any combination of the above, which may (a) differ from participant to participant; (b) be based on the performance of the Company as a whole or the performance of a specific participant or a subsidiary, division, department, region, store, function or business unit of the Company; and (c) be measured on an absolute basis or in relation to the Company’s peers or an index.
On February 4, 2014, the HR Committee approved annual incentives for our named executive officers under the Omnibus AIP for our 2014 fiscal year, subject to approval of the Omnibus AIP by our Board. The amount of money that will be made available in the pool at the end of the year to pay bonuses to our named executive officers will be determined based on the executive participation rates set forth below and our financial performance against earnings before interest and taxes, free cash flow and net revenue metrics established by the HR Committee:
|
•
|
Charles V. Bergh: 150% of base salary;
|
|
•
|
Harmit Singh: 80% of base salary;
|
|
•
|
Anne Rohosy: 80% of base salary;
|
|
•
|
James Curleigh: 80% of base salary; and
|
|
•
|
Roy Bagattini: 70% of base salary.
|
Actual bonus payments will be determined based 75% on our financial performance (based on earnings before interest and taxes, free cash flow, and net revenues) and 25% on individual performance.
Stock Appreciation Rights Awards to Named Executive Officers
On February 5, 2014, our Board granted Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) to the following named executive officers:
|
•
|
Charles V. Bergh received two grants, one service-vested award in the amount of 193,154 SARs and one performance-based award at target performance in the amount of 128,770 SARs;
|
|
•
|
Harmit Singh received two grants, one service-vested award in the amount of 44,052 SARs and one performance-based award at target performance in the amount of 29,369 SARs;
|
|
•
|
Anne Rohosy received two grants, one service-vested award in the amount of 37,275 SARs and one performance-based award at target performance in the amount of 24,850 SARs;
|
|
•
|
James Curleigh received two grants, one service-vested award in the amount of 33,886 SARs and one performance-based award at target performance in the amount of 22,592 SARs.
|
|
•
|
Roy Bagattini received two grants, one service-vested award in the amount of 22,873 SARs and one performance-based award at target performance in the amount of 15,249 SARs; and
|
SARs are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock, as determined under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, on the date of grant. The SARs were granted in two groups and are identical except as follows: (a) service-vested SARs, were granted with the following vesting schedule: 25% percent of the SAR grant vests on the day prior to the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, with the remaining 75% balance vesting monthly over 36 months commencing on such anniversary, at a rate of 2.08% per month, (b) 50% of the performance-based SARs will vest to the extent that the Company has
82
achieved certain goals based on the Company's (i) average earnings before interest and taxes margin percentage and (ii) the compound annual growth rate of the Company's net revenues, each over fiscal years 2014, 2015 and 2016, and (c) the remaining 50% of the performance-based SARs will vest based on the Company’s performance against a three-year market-related relative total shareholder return goal. Our Board will determine the extent to which the goals under the performance-based SARs have been satisfied on or before March, 1, 2017.
2014 Dividend
On February 5, 2014, our Board declared a one-time cash dividend of $30.0 million. The dividend is payable to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 18, 2014.
The declaration of cash dividends in the future is subject to determination by our Board based on a number of factors, including our financial condition and compliance with the terms of our debt agreements. For these reasons, as well as others, there can be no assurance that our Board will declare additional cash dividends in the future.
83
|
Item 10.
|
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
The following provides information about our directors and executive officers as of
February 6, 2014
.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
|
Stephen C. Neal
|
64
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
||
|
Robert D. Haas
(1)(2)(4)
|
71
|
Director, Chairman Emeritus
|
||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
56
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
Fernando Aguirre
(2)(3)(4)
|
56
|
Director
|
||
|
Troy Alstead
(2)(3)
|
50
|
Director
|
||
|
Jill Beraud
(3)
|
53
|
Director
|
||
|
Vanessa J. Castagna
(1)(3)
|
64
|
Director
|
||
|
Robert A. Eckert
(1)(4)
|
59
|
Director
|
||
|
Spencer C. Fleischer
(2)(3)
|
60
|
Director
|
||
|
Peter E. Haas Jr.
(1)(4)
|
66
|
Director
|
||
|
Patricia Salas Pineda
(1)(4)
|
62
|
Director
|
||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
50
|
Executive Vice President and President, Asia, Middle East and Africa
|
||
|
Varun Bhatia
|
49
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
|
||
|
Lisa Collier
|
48
|
Executive Vice President and President, Global Dockers
®
Brand
|
||
|
James Curleigh
|
48
|
Executive Vice President and President, Global Levi's
®
Brand
|
||
|
Seth Ellison
|
55
|
Executive Vice President and President, Europe
|
||
|
Seth R. Jaffe
|
56
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
|
||
|
David Love
|
51
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer
|
||
|
Kelly McGinnis
|
45
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Chief Communications Officer
|
||
|
Craig Nomura
|
50
|
Executive Vice President and President, Global Retail
|
||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
55
|
Executive Vice President and President, Americas
|
||
|
Harmit Singh
|
50
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Member, Human Resources Committee.
|
|
(2)
|
Member, Finance Committee.
|
|
(3)
|
Member, Audit Committee.
|
|
(4)
|
Member, Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee.
|
Members of the Haas family are descendants of the family of our founder, Levi Strauss. Peter E. Haas Jr. is a cousin of Robert D. Haas.
Directors
Stephen C. Neal
,
a director since 2007, became our Chairman of the Board in September 2011. He is also the Chairman of the law firm Cooley LLP, where he was also Chief Executive Officer from 2001 until January 1, 2008. In addition to his extensive experience as a trial lawyer on a broad range of corporate issues, Mr. Neal has represented and advised numerous boards of directors, special committees of boards and individual directors on corporate governance and other legal matters. Prior to joining Cooley in 1995, Mr. Neal was a partner of the law firm Kirkland & Ellis.
Mr. Neal brings to the board deep knowledge and broad experience in corporate governance as well as his perspectives drawn from advising many companies throughout his career.
Robert D. Haas
,
a director since 1980, is our longest-serving director. He served as Chairman from 1989 to February 2008 when he was named Chairman Emeritus. Mr. Haas joined the Company in 1973 and served in a variety of marketing, planning and operating positions including Chief Executive Officer from 1984 to 1999. In 1985, Mr. Haas led the effort to take the Company private through a leveraged buyout. As Chief Executive Officer he oversaw a business turnaround that resulted in more than a decade of substantial growth, paced by international expansion and the launch of the Dockers
®
brand. Under Mr. Haas' leadership,
84
the Company pioneered a number of practices and policies that have been adopted by corporations and institutions worldwide. These include HIV/AIDS awareness, education and prevention programs, a comprehensive code of supplier conduct to promote safe and healthy working conditions, and full medical benefits for the domestic partners of our employees. Mr. Haas' deep experience in all aspects of the business as well as his familial connection to the Company's founder, prior leaders and shareholders, provide him with a unique perspective on matters discussed by the directors.
Charles V. Bergh,
a director since he joined the Company in September 2011, is our President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bergh was Group President, Global Male Grooming, for The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”), a manufacturer and distributor of consumer products. He held a progression of leadership roles during his 28-year career at P&G. Mr. Bergh previously served on the Board of Directors for VF Corporation and on the Economic Development Board, Singapore, and was a member of the US-AESAN Business Council, Singapore. Mr. Bergh's position as our Chief Executive Officer and his past experience as a leader of large, global consumer brands makes him well-suited to be a member of our board of directors.
Fernando Aguirre
, a director since October 2010, is formerly Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chiquita Brands International, Inc., a position he held from 2004 until October 2012. From 1980 to 2004, Mr. Aguirre served The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) in various capacities, including as Vice President of P&G's Global Snacks and U.S. Food Products business, President of Global Feminine Care and President of Special Projects. Mr. Aguirre brings to the board his experiences as a leader of large, global consumer brands, and his skills in translating consumer insights into strategies that drive growth across cultures. Mr. Aguirre is also currently a director of Aetna, Inc. and Barry Callebaut and was a director of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. until 2010.
Troy Alstead
,
a director since April 2012, is Chief Operating Officer for Starbucks Corporation, a role he assumed as of February 3, 2014. Mr. Alstead was most recently Group President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2013 until his promotion to his current role. From November 2008 to September 2013, Mr. Alstead was Chief Financial officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Starbucks. He joined Starbucks in 1992, previously serving as Chief Operating Officer, Starbucks Greater China from April 2008 to October 2008, Senior Vice President, Global Finance and Business Operations from August 2007 to April 2008, and Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance from September 2004 to August 2007. Mr. Alstead served in a number of other senior positions with Starbucks prior to 2004. Mr. Alstead brings to the board his broad financial and business perspective developed over many years in the global consumer goods industry.
Jill Beraud
, a director since February 2013, is Chief Executive Officer of Living Proof, Inc., a privately-held company that uses advanced medical and materials technologies to create hair care and skin care products for women, a position she has held since December 2011. Prior to that, Ms. Beraud served as President, Starbucks/Lipton Joint Ventures and Chief Marketing Officer of PepsiCo Americas Beverages from July 2009 to June 2011, and PepsiCo’s Global Chief Marketing Officer from December 2008 to July 2009. Before PepsiCo, Ms. Beraud spent 13 years at Limited Brands in various roles, including Chief Marketing Officer of Victoria’s Secret and Executive Vice President of Marketing for its broader portfolio of specialty brands, including Bath & Body Works, C.O. Bigelow, Express, Henri Bendel, and Limited Stores. Ms. Beraud was selected to join the board due to her extensive marketing, social media and consumer branding experience, as well as her extensive managerial and operational knowledge in the apparel and other consumer goods industries. Ms. Beraud is currently a director of New York & Company, Inc.
Vanessa J. Castagna
,
a director since 2007, led Mervyns LLC department stores as its Executive Chairwoman of the Board from 2005 until early 2007. Prior to Mervyns LLC, Ms. Castagna served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of JC Penney Stores, Catalog and Internet from 2002 through 2004. She joined JC Penney in 1999 as Chief Operating Officer, and was both President and Chief Operating Officer of JC Penney Stores, Catalog and Internet in 2001. Ms. Castagna was selected to serve on the board due to her extensive retail leadership experience. She brings to the board a valuable perspective on the retail and wholesale business. In March 2013, Ms. Castagna was appointed to the Board of Trustees of Purdue University. Ms. Castagna is currently a director of Carter's Inc. and was a director of SpeedFC until 2012.
Robert A. Eckert
, a director since May 2010, served as Chairman of the Board of Mattel, Inc. from May 2000 until December 2012, and was Chief Executive Officer from May 2000 until December 2011. He previously worked for Kraft Foods, Inc. for 23 years, most recently as President and Chief Executive Officer from October 1997 until May 2000. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Eckert was Group Vice President of Kraft Foods, and from 1993 to 1995, Mr. Eckert was President of the Oscar Mayer foods division of Kraft Foods. Mr. Eckert was selected to join the board due to his experience as a senior executive engaged with the dynamics of building global consumer brands through high performance expectations, integrity, and decisiveness in driving businesses to successful results. Mr. Eckert is currently a director of McDonald's Corporation, Amgen, Inc. and Smart & Final Inc.
85
Spencer C. Fleischer,
a director since July 2013, is Co-Founder and President of Friedman Fleischer & Lowe LLC (“FFL”). Before co-founding FFL in 1997, Mr. Fleischer spent 19 years at Morgan Stanley & Company as an investment banker and senior leader. During his time there, he led business units across the globe, including serving as Head of Investment Banking in Asia, Head of Corporate Finance for Europe and Head of Corporate Finance in San Francisco. Mr. Fleischer was selected to join the board due to his broad financial and international business perspective developed over many years in the investment banking industry. Mr. Fleischer currently serves as a director of AmericanWest Bank, Strategic Investment Group and Wilton Re Holdings Limited.
Peter E. Haas Jr.
, a director since 1985, is a director or trustee of each of the Levi Strauss Foundation, Red Tab Foundation, Joanne and Peter Haas Jr. Fund, Walter and Elise Haas Fund and the Novato Youth Center Honorary Board, a Trustee Emeritus of the San Francisco Foundation, and he is Vice President of the Peter E. Haas Jr. Fund. Mr. Haas was one of our managers from 1972 to 1989. He was Director of Product Integrity of The Jeans Company, one of our former operating units, from 1984 to 1989. He served as Director of Materials Management for Levi Strauss USA in 1982 and Vice President and General Manager in the Menswear Division in 1980. Mr. Haas' background in numerous operational roles specific to the Company and his familial connection to the Company's founder enable him to engage in board deliberations with valuable insight and experience.
Patricia Salas Pineda
, a director since 1991, is currently Group Vice President, Hispanic Business Strategy for Toyota Motor North America, Inc., an affiliate of one of the world's largest automotive firms, a position she has held since May 2013. Ms. Pineda served Toyota Motor North America in various capacities, including Group Vice President, National Philanthropy and the Toyota USA Foundation from 2008 until her appointment to her current role and before that, as General Counsel and Group Vice President, Administration and Philanthropy from 2006 to 2008. Ms. Pineda joined Toyota Motor North America in 2004 as Group Vice President of Corporate Communications and General Counsel. Prior to that, Ms. Pineda was Vice President of Legal, Human Resources and Government Relations and Corporate Secretary of New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. with which she had been associated since 1984. Ms. Pineda was selected as a member of the board to bring her expertise in government relations and regulatory oversight, corporate governance and human resources matters. Her long tenure on the board also provides valuable historical perspective. She is currently a member of the corporate advisory board of the National Council of La Raza, a member of the board of advisors of Catalyst and interim board member of the Latino Corporate Directors Association and the New York Restoration Project.
Executive Officers
Charles V. Bergh's biography is set forth under the heading "Directors" above.
Roy Bagattini,
joined the Company as our Executive Vice President and President of the Asia Pacific region in June 2013. At the end of November 2013, Mr. Bagattini’s role was expanded to include the Middle East and Africa. Mr. Bagattini was Senior Vice President for Asia and Africa at Carlsberg Group, a leading brewing and beverage company, from 2009 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Bagattini served in a variety of executive and leadership roles in Russia, China, India and the United States for SABMiller plc, one of the world’s largest brewing companies, from 1991 to 2009.
Varun Bhatia
joined the Company as our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer in July 2012. Mr. Bhatia was previously Vice President of Human Resources of the Asia Pacific division at Kraft Foods from April 2008 to July 2012. Prior to that, he held various human resources executive roles with consumer goods companies including Kraft Foods, Gillette and Procter & Gamble.
Lisa Collier
is currently serving as our Executive Vice President and President of Global Dockers
®
Brand, a position she has held since July 2013. From July 2012 until her appointment to her current role, Ms. Collier served as Senior Vice President of Product Development and Innovation across all of our brands. Before that, Ms. Collier held various leadership roles in the Company, at times serving in dual roles, including Senior Vice President of Dockers
®
Merchandising, Licensing & Supply Chain from April 2010 to November 2012, Managing Director and General Manager of Levi Strauss Australia and New Zealand from December 2007 to April 2011, and Vice President of U.S. Retail from May 2006 to November 2007. Ms. Collier joined the Company in October 2003 as Vice President of Product Management for the U.S. Levi’s
®
Brand, a position she held until May 2006. Ms. Collier has more than 25 years of professional experience in the apparel industry. Before joining the Company, she served as Vice President of Product Development, Planning and Sourcing at Tarrant Apparel Group and held various positions at The Limited in merchandising and buying.
86
James Curleigh
joined the Company as our Executive Vice President and President of the Global Levi's
®
Brand in July 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Curleigh served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Keen Footwear, Inc., a footwear and accessory company, from March 2008 to May 2012. Before Keen, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Salomon Sports North America, an innovative performance sports company, from 2001 to 2007. He also established and led TaylorMade adidas golf division in Europe and held various leadership positions in the London office of M&M Mars, a global consumer goods company.
Seth Ellison
is currently serving as our Executive Vice President and President of our Europe region. Mr. Ellison joined the Company in September 2012 as Executive Vice President and President of the Global Dockers
®
Brand before assuming his current role in July 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ellison was Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Alternative Apparel from February 2009 to July 2012. Before Alternative Apparel, Mr. Ellison was President of the Swimwear Group at Perry Ellis from 2005 to 2009, and held various leadership positions at NIKE, Inc. from 1996 to 2005.
Seth Jaffe
joined the Company as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel in September 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jaffe served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. from January 2002 to August 2011. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Jaffe served as Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel of CareThere, Inc.
Mr. Jaffe also held various legal roles at the Company from 1984 to 1999 with increasing responsibilities in the United States and Europe during that time.
David Love
is our Senior Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer, a position he has held since 2004. Mr. Love is responsible for development, sourcing and delivery of our products worldwide. Prior to assuming this role, Mr. Love was Vice President of our U.S. Supply Chain organization from 2001 to 2004 and Senior Director of Product Services for the U.S. Levi's
®
brand from 1999 to 2001. From 1981, when he joined the Company, to 2001, Mr. Love held various managerial positions.
Craig Nomura
joined the Company as our Executive Vice President and President of Global Retail in February 2014. Mr. Nomura served as Senior Vice President of Global Development for Williams Sonoma, Inc. from May 2011 until he joined the Company. From January 2005 to April 2011, Mr. Nomura was Representative Director and Managing Director for The Gap, Inc. based in Japan. Mr. Nomura has more than 20 years of professional experience in the apparel industry working at companies that include The Gap, Inc., The Gymboree Corporation, Guess? Inc. and Foot Locker, Inc.
Kelly McGinnis
joined the Company in August 2013 as our Senior Vice President of Corporate Affairs and Chief Communications Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. McGinnis served as Vice President of Global Communications at Dell Inc. from March 2010 to 2013. Before Dell, from March 2008 to 2010, she was President of Axicom U.S., a global technology public relations company. From 2001 to 2008, Ms. McGinnis was a senior partner at Fleishman-Hillard and served as general manager of the firm’s San Francisco office.
Anne Rohosy
is our Executive Vice President and President of the Americas region, a position she has held since July 2013. From February 2012 until her appointment to her current role, Ms. Rohosy served as President of Commercial Operations for the Americas and Europe regions while continuing her role as Executive Vice President and President of the Global Dockers
®
Brand, a position she held from May 2011 until September 2012. From October 2009, when she joined the Company, until May 2011, she served as Senior Vice President, Levi's
®
North America Commercial Operations, and then served as Senior Vice President, Levi's
®
Wholesale, Americas. Ms. Rohosy's professional experience in the apparel industry spans more than 30 years with such global brands as Swatch, Liz Claiborne and NIKE, Inc., where she held various leadership roles from 1990 to 2005 and led the company's commercial strategy development and apparel sales in the United States and Europe.
Harmit Singh
joined the Company as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2013, and as a part of his responsibilities, oversees our technology initiatives. Previously, Mr. Singh, was
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Hyatt Hotels Corporation from August 2008 to December 2012. Prior to that, he spent 14 years at Yum! Brands, Inc. in a variety of roles including Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Yum Restaurants International from 2005 to 2008. Before joining Yum!, Mr. Singh worked in various financial capacities for American Express India & Area Countries, a worldwide travel, financial and network services company. Mr. Singh served on the board of directors and was also the Audit Committee Chair of Avendra, LLC through August 2012. Mr. Singh is a Chartered Accountant from India.
Our Board of Directors
Our board of directors currently has eleven members. Our board is divided into three classes with directors elected for overlapping three-year terms. The term for directors in Class I (Mr. Aguirre, Ms. Beraud, Mr. Fleischer and Mr. R.D. Haas) will end at our annual stockholders' meeting in 2014. As previously announced, Mr. R.D. Haas will retire from the Board on his 72
nd
birthday in April 2014, in accordance with the Company’s director retirement policy. The term for directors in Class II (Ms.
87
Castagna, Mr. P. E. Haas Jr. and Mr. Neal) will end at our annual stockholders' meeting in 2015. The term for directors in Class III (Mr. Alstead, Mr. Bergh, Mr. Eckert and Ms. Pineda) will end at our annual stockholders' meeting in 2016.
Committees
.
Our board of directors has four standing committees.
|
•
|
Audit.
Our Audit Committee provides assistance to the board in the board's oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, financial reporting processes, internal controls systems and compliance with legal requirements. The committee meets with our management regularly to discuss our critical accounting policies, internal controls and financial reporting process and our financial reports to the public. The committee also meets with our independent registered public accounting firm and with our financial personnel and internal auditors regarding these matters. The committee also examines the independence and performance of our internal auditors and our independent registered public accounting firm. The committee has sole and direct authority to engage, appoint, evaluate and replace our independent auditor. Both our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal auditors regularly meet privately with this committee and have unrestricted access to the committee. The Audit Committee held seven meetings during
2013
.
|
– Members: Mr. Alstead (Chair), Mr. Aguirre, Ms. Beraud, Ms. Castagna and Mr. Fleischer.
Each of Messrs. Alstead and Fleischer have been determined to be our Audit Committee financial experts as currently defined under SEC rules. We believe that the composition of our Audit Committee meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our Audit Committee complies with the applicable requirements of, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC rules and regulations.
|
•
|
Finance.
Our Finance Committee provides assistance to the board in the board's oversight of our financial condition and management, financing strategies and execution and relationships with stockholders, creditors and other members of the financial community. The Finance Committee held three meetings in
2013
and otherwise acted by unanimous written consent.
|
– Members: Mr. Aguirre (Chair), Mr. Alstead, Mr. Fleischer and Mr. R.D. Haas.
|
•
|
Human Resources.
Our Human Resources Committee provides assistance to the board in the board's oversight of our compensation, benefits and human resources programs and of senior management performance, composition and compensation. The committee reviews our compensation objectives and performance against those objectives, reviews market conditions and practices and our strategy and processes for making compensation decisions and approves (or, in the case of our chief executive officer, recommends to the Board) the annual and long term compensation for our executive officers, including our long term incentive compensation plans. The committee also reviews our succession planning, diversity and benefit plans. The Human Resources Committee held three meetings in
2013
.
|
– Members: Mr. Eckert (Chair), Ms. Castagna, Mr. P.E. Haas Jr., Mr. R.D. Haas and Ms. Pineda.
|
•
|
Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship.
Our Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee is responsible for identifying qualified candidates for our board of directors and making recommendations regarding the size and composition of the board. In addition, the committee is responsible for overseeing our corporate governance matters, reporting and making recommendations to the board concerning corporate governance matters, reviewing the performance of our chairman and chief executive officer and determining director compensation. The committee also assists the board with oversight and review of corporate citizenship and sustainability matters which may have a significant impact on the Company. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee held six meetings in
2013
.
|
– Members: Mr. Aguirre (Chair), Mr. Eckert, Mr. R.D. Haas, Mr. P.E. Haas Jr. and Ms. Pineda.
Board Composition and Risk Management Practices
Board Leadership
While our by-laws do not require separation of the offices of chairman and chief executive officer, these positions are held by different individuals. The Board believes that the separation of the roles of chairman and chief executive officer is a matter to be addressed as part of the succession planning process for those roles and that it is in the best interests of the Company for the board, upon the review and advice of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee, to make such a determination when it elects a new chairman or chief executive officer or otherwise as the circumstances may require.
88
Board Selection Criteria
According to the board's written membership policy, the board seeks directors who are committed to the values of the Company and are, by reason of their character, judgment, knowledge and experience, capable of contributing to the effective governance of the Company. Additionally, the board is committed to maintaining a diverse and engaged board of directors composed of both stockholders and non-stockholders. Upon any vacancy on the board, it seeks to fill that vacancy with any specific skills, experiences or attributes that will enhance the overall perspective or functioning of the board.
Board's Role in Risk Management
Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks facing the Company, while the board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. Management engages the board in discussions concerning risk periodically and as needed, and addresses the topic as part of the annual planning discussions where the board and management review key risks to the Company's plans and strategies and the mitigation plans for those risks. In addition, the Audit Committee of the board has the responsibility to review the Company's major financial risk exposures
and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, with management, the senior internal auditing executive and the independent registered public accounting firm.
Worldwide Code of Business Conduct
We have a Worldwide Code of Business Conduct which applies to all of our directors and employees, including the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the controller and our other senior financial officers. The Worldwide Code of Business Conduct covers a number of topics including:
|
•
|
accounting practices and financial communications;
|
|
•
|
conflicts of interest;
|
|
•
|
confidentiality;
|
|
•
|
corporate opportunities;
|
|
•
|
insider trading; and
|
|
•
|
compliance with laws.
|
A copy of the Worldwide Code of Business Conduct is an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
Item 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ("EXECUTIVES")
Our compensation policies and programs are designed to support the achievement of our strategic business plans by attracting, retaining and motivating exceptional talent. Our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace depends on the knowledge, capabilities and integrity of our leaders. Our compensation programs help create a high-performance, outcome-driven and principled culture by holding leaders accountable for delivering results, developing our employees and exemplifying our core values. In addition, we believe that our compensation policies and programs for leaders and employees do not promote risk-taking to any degree that would have a material adverse effect on the company.
The Human Resources Committee (the “HR Committee”) of our Board of Directors (the "Board") is responsible for overseeing our executive compensation practices. Each year, the HR Committee conducts a review of our compensation and benefits programs to assess whether the programs are aligned with our business strategies, the competitive practices of our peer companies and our stockholders' interests.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation philosophy focuses on the following key goals:
|
•
|
Attract, motivate and retain high performing talent in an extremely competitive marketplace
|
|
◦
|
Our ability to achieve our strategic business plans and compete effectively in the marketplace is based on our ability to attract, motivate and retain exceptional leadership talent in a highly competitive talent market.
|
|
•
|
Deliver competitive compensation for achievement of annual and long-term results
|
89
|
◦
|
We provide competitive total compensation opportunities that are intended to attract, motivate and retain a highly capable and results-driven executive team, with the majority of compensation based on the achievements of long-term performance results.
|
|
•
|
Align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders
|
|
◦
|
Our programs offer compensation incentives that are intended to motivate executives to enhance total stockholder return. These programs align certain elements of compensation with our achievement of corporate growth objectives (including defined financial targets and increases in stockholder value) as well as individual performance.
|
Policies and Practices for Establishing Compensation Packages
Establishing the elements of compensation
The HR Committee establishes the elements of compensation for our executives after an extensive review of market data on the executives from the peer group described below. The HR Committee reviews each element of compensation independently and in the aggregate to determine the right mix of elements, and associated amounts, for each executive that it believes best helps us further our goals of motivating and retaining our executives, achieving our strategic business plans, and enhancing total stockholder return.
A consistent approach is used for all executives when establishing each compensation element. However, the HR Committee, and the Board for the CEO, maintains flexibility to exercise its independent judgment in how it applies the standard approach to each executive, taking into account unique considerations existing at an executive's time of hire, promotion or annual performance review, and the current and future estimated value of previously granted long-term incentives, both performance and time-vesting.
Competitive peer group
In determining the design and the amount of each element of compensation, the HR Committee conducts a thorough annual review of competitive market information. The HR Committee reviews data provided by Aon Hewitt concerning peer companies in the consumer products, apparel and retail industry segments. The peer group is comprised of companies with median revenue and other industry related characteristics (such as apparel, retail and select consumer products companies with premium branded products) that are comparable to us and, more importantly, that we compete with for executive talent. The 2013 peer group used in establishing our executives' 2013 compensation packages is presented below. The following companies were removed from the 2013 peer group: The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., Colgate-Palmolive Company, General Mills, Inc., Kellogg Company, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Kohl’s Corporation, Retail Ventures, Revlon, Inc., Whirlpool Corporation, and Yum! Brands, Inc. as they are less comparable due to significantly larger or smaller revenue size and/or market capitalization and there has been little recent competition for executive talent with these companies. In addition, due to structural changes (e.g. acquisitions), the following companies are no longer included in our peer group; Alberto Culver Company, Charming Shoppes, Eddie Bauer LLC, The Timberland Company, and Sara Lee Corporation.
|
Company Name
|
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
|
Hanesbrand Inc.
|
|
Aéropostale, Inc.
|
Hasbro, Inc.
|
|
American Eagle Outfitters
|
J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
|
|
ANN INC.
|
The Jones Group, Inc.
|
|
Avon Products, Inc.
|
Limited Brands, Inc.
|
|
Burberry Group PLC
|
Mattel, Inc.
|
|
The Clorox Company
|
NIKE, Inc.
|
|
Coach, Inc.
|
Nordstrom, Inc.
|
|
Dillard's, Inc.
|
PVH Corp.
|
|
Estée Lauder Companies, Inc.
|
Ralph Lauren Corporation
|
|
Foot Locker, Inc.
|
Tiffany & Co.
|
|
The Gap, Inc.
|
VF Corporation
|
|
Guess? Inc.
|
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
|
90
Establishing compensation for executives other than the CEO
While the HR Committee uses peer group market data percentiles as reference points in setting executive compensation, the HR Committee does not target specific benchmark percentiles for any element of compensation or total direct compensation for the executive officers (including the CEO). Instead, the HR Committee uses a number of factors in determining compensation for our executives in a manner that it believes best helps us further our goals of motivating and retaining our executives, achieving our strategic business plans, and enhancing total stockholder return. The factors considered in establishing compensation for our executives include, among others, our performance, the individual's performance in the prior year, the scope of each individual's responsibilities, internal and external pay equity, the guidelines used for setting annual cash, long-term and total compensation for the executives described below, succession planning strategies, and data regarding pay practices and trends.
The CEO conducts an annual performance review of each executive and makes recommendations to the HR Committee about the structure of the executive compensation program and individual arrangements.
The CEO is generally present at HR Committee meetings when compensation, other than his own, is considered and approved.
The HR Committee carefully considers the CEO's recommendation and consults with its consultant, Exequity, an independent board advisor firm, which informs the HR Committee of market trends and conditions, comments on market data relative to each executive’s current compensation, and provides perspective on other company executive compensation practices. The HR committee approves all compensation decisions affecting the executives, other than that of the CEO which is approved by the full Board. The HR Committee then reports on its decisions to the full Board.
Kevin Wilson served as the Company's Interim Chief Financial Officer while continuing to serve as Vice President, Finance, Americas Commercial Operations, until Harmit Singh joined the Company in January 2013 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As such, the compensation guidelines and procedures established for our executives as described here did not apply to him during the interim period. His compensation continues to be managed in a manner consistent with the guidelines for all other vice president level employees.
Establishing the CEO compensation package
At the completion of each year, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee (the “NG&CC Committee”) assesses the CEO's performance against annual objectives that were established jointly by the CEO and the NG&CC Committee at the beginning of that year, and submits its performance assessment to the HR Committee. The HR Committee then reviews the performance assessment and peer group compensation data in its deliberations. During this decision-making process, the HR Committee consults with its consultant, Exequity, which informs the HR Committee of market trends and conditions, comments on market data relative to the CEO's current compensation, and provides perspective on other companies' CEO compensation practices. Based on all of these inputs, the company's performance, and the guidelines used for setting annual cash, long-term and total compensation for the other executives, described below, the HR Committee prepares a recommendation to the full Board on all aspects of the CEO's compensation. The full Board then considers the HR Committee's recommendation and approves the final compensation package for the CEO.
Role of the Compensation Consultant in compensation decisions
The HR Committee has also engaged Exequity to provide the HR Committee with periodic advice on the compensation program structure and individual compensation arrangements for all executives. The consultant was selected by the HR Committee in its sole discretion and does not provide any other services to the Company. The consultant attends HR Committee meetings from time to time, presents an annual briefing on general and retail-industry compensation trends and developments, and is also available to the HR Committee outside of meetings as necessary. The consultant reports directly to the HR Committee, although the consultant meets with management from time to time to obtain information necessary to advise the HR Committee.
In addition, the HR Committee periodically reviews its relationship with its independent compensation consultant. The HR Committee believes that the consultant it retains is able to provide it with independent advice.
Elements of Compensation
The primary elements of compensation for our executives are:
|
•
|
Base Salary;
|
|
•
|
Annual Incentive Plan Awards; and
|
|
•
|
Long-Term Incentive Awards
|
91
Base Salary
The objective of base salary is to reward each executive for their current contributions to the Company, reflect the scope of the executives’ roles and responsibilities and compensate each executive for their expected day-to-day performance, as well as provide fixed compensation that reflects what the market pays to individuals in similar roles with comparable experience. The peer group data serves as a general guideline only. The HR Committee, and for the CEO, the Board, retains the authority to exercise its independent judgment in establishing the base salary levels for each executive. The HR Committee reviews base salaries for executives on an annual basis in the first fiscal quarter considering the factors described above under “Establishing compensation for executives other than the CEO,” and as needed in connection with promotions or other changes in responsibilities. The table below summarizes base salaries during fiscal 2013, and changes that occurred during the year.
|
Name
|
Base Salary as of November 24, 2013
|
Base Salary as of November 25, 2012
|
||||||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
||||
|
Harmit Singh
(1)
|
675,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
||||||
|
Kevin Wilson (Interim CFO)
(2)
|
312,000
|
|
300,000
|
|
||||||
|
Anne Rohosy
(2)
|
700,000
|
|
675,000
|
|
||||||
|
James Curleigh
(2)
|
600,000
|
|
550,000
|
|
||||||
|
Roy Bagattini
(3)
|
660,410
|
|
N/A
|
|
||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
Mr. Singh joined the Company in January 2013 as the Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
(2)
|
The base salary for each of Messrs. Bergh, Wilson and Curleigh, and Ms. Rohosy were increased in February 2013 as part of the annual review, and with the exception of Mr. Wilson, to position each appropriately relative to the other executives.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. Bagattini joined the Company in June 2013 as the Executive Vice President and President of the Asia Pacific region. At the end of November 2013, Mr. Bagattini's role was expanded to include the Middle East and Africa. Mr. Bagattini was paid in Singapore Dollars (SGD). For purposes of the table, his base salary of SGD 821,405 was converted into U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 0.8040, which is the average exchange rate for November 2013.
|
Annual Incentive Plan
Our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) provides the executives, and other eligible employees, an opportunity to share in any success that they help create by aligning annual incentive compensation with annual performance. The AIP encourages the achievement of our internal annual business goals and rewards Company, business unit and individual performance against those annual objectives. The alignment of AIP with our internal annual business goals is intended to motivate all participants to achieve and exceed our annual performance objectives.
The AIP funding for
2013
, or the amount of money made available in the AIP pool at the end of the year to pay bonuses to executives, was determined based on the executive participation rates set forth below and our financial performance against the earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”), days in working capital and net revenues metrics described below.
Actual AIP bonus payments allocated to executives from the AIP pool were based on the executive’s participation rate and the following two components:
|
•
|
Financial performance of the Company (70% based on earnings before interest and taxes and days in working capital and 30% on net revenues). Performance measures are described in more detail below under “Performance measures”.
|
|
•
|
Individual objectives, to recognize achievement of other organizational goals.
|
The AIP bonus allocated to executives from the AIP Pool was based 25% on financial performance of the Company and 75% on individual performance. Financial performance above threshold is required before any bonus payout is made to executives.
92
The table below describes the target AIP participation rate and potential AIP payout range for each executive. Mr. Bergh’s AIP target percentage of base salary was higher to ensure competitiveness and to recognize the impact of his role relative to other executives
.
|
Name
|
2013 AIP Participation Rate as a Percentage of Base Salary
|
Potential AIP Payout Range as a Percentage of Base Salary
|
||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
140%
|
0 – 280%
|
||||
|
Harmit Singh
|
80%
|
0 – 160%
|
||||
|
Kevin Wilson
(1)
|
41%
|
0 – 82%
|
||||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
80%
|
0 – 160%
|
||||
|
James Curleigh
|
80%
|
0 – 160%
|
||||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
70%
|
0 – 140%
|
||||
______________
|
(1)
|
Mr. Wilson served as interim CFO until January 16, 2013. His AIP target participation rate includes the cash bonuses paid to him in recognition of serving as the interim CFO.
|
Performance measures
Our priorities for
2013
were to drive business growth and create stockholder value. Our
2013
AIP funding goals were aligned with these key priorities through the use of three performance measures:
|
•
|
EBIT,
a non-GAAP measure that is determined by deducting from operating income, as determined under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), the following: restructuring expense, net curtailment gains and losses from our post retirement medical plan in the United States and pension plans worldwide, and certain management-defined unusual, non-recurring selling, general and administrative expense/income items,
|
|
•
|
Days in working capital
, a non-GAAP measure defined as the average days in net trade receivables, plus the average days in inventories, minus the average days in accounts payable, where averages are calculated based on ending balances over the past thirteen months, and
|
|
•
|
Net revenues
as determined under GAAP.
|
We used these measures because we believe they are key drivers in increasing stockholder value and because every AIP participant can impact them in some way. EBIT and days in working capital are used as indicators of our earnings and operating cash flow performance, and net revenues is used as an indicator of our growth. These measures may change from time to time based on business priorities. The HR Committee approves the goals for each measure and the respective funding scale each year. The reward for meeting the AIP goals is set by the HR Committee. If goal levels are not met, but performance reaches minimum thresholds, participants may receive partial payouts to recognize their efforts that contributed to Company performance.
93
The AIP funding, or the amount of money made available in the AIP pool at the end of the year, is dependent on how actual performance compares to the goals. Actual performance is measured after eliminating any variance introduced by foreign currency movements and other adjustments determined to be appropriate by management based on business circumstances. In
2013
, EBIT, days in working capital and net revenues worked together as follows to determine the AIP funding level percentage:
|
( EBIT Funding
|
x
|
Working Capital Funding Modifier )
|
+
|
Net Revenues Funding
|
=
|
2013 AIP Funding
|
||||||||
|
% of EBIT Goals
|
Initial EBIT AIP
Funding %
|
% of Working Capital Goals
|
Working Capital
Funding Modifier
|
% of Net Revenues Goal*
|
Net Revenues AIP
Funding % **
|
Performance
|
Total AIP
Funding Level %
|
|||||||
|
≥ 125%
|
175%
|
≥ 110%
|
1.20
|
≥ 110%
|
175%
|
Max
|
175%
|
|||||||
|
100%
|
100%
|
x
|
100%
|
1.00
|
+
|
100%
|
100%
|
=
|
Plan
|
100%
|
||||
|
< 85%
|
0%
|
≤ 80%
|
0.30
|
<95%
|
0%
|
Min
|
0%
|
|||||||
|
Note: EBIT-Working Capital Funding is capped at 175%
|
* Total Company Goal
|
|||||||||||||
|
** 100% achievement of EBIT goals required for Net Rev funding above 100%
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Incentive Pool Funding Weight:
|
70%
|
+
|
30%
|
=
|
100%
|
|||||||||
|
•
|
Actual EBIT performance compared to our EBIT goals determines initial EBIT AIP funding.
|
|
•
|
Actual days in working capital performance compared to our days in working capital goals results in a working capital modifier, which increases or decreases the initial EBIT AIP funding.
|
|
•
|
Actual net revenues performance compared to our net revenues goals determines net revenues AIP funding. To ensure that any incremental net revenues meets profitability goals, actual EBIT must meet or exceed our target EBIT goals (i.e., at greater than or equal to 100%) in order for net revenues funding to be in excess of 100%.
|
|
•
|
EBIT funding and net revenues funding are multiplied by the respective incentive pool funding weight and are totaled to determine the AIP funding.
|
The table below shows the
2013
goals at target for each of our three performance measures and the actual
2013
funding level percentage reflecting the total Company performance. For our executives, EBIT, days in working capital, and net revenues were based on total Company performance as they provide leadership to and hold accountability for the total Company:
|
EBIT Goal
|
Days in Working Capital Goal
|
Net Revenues Goal
|
Actual AIP Funding Level%*
|
||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|||||||||
|
Total Company
|
$423
|
89
|
$4,693
|
120%
|
|||||
_____________
* The funding results exclude the impacts of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on our business results.
At the close of the fiscal year, the HR Committee reviews and approves the final AIP funding levels based on the level of attainment of the designated financial measures at the local, regional and total Company levels. The Committee's review includes an analysis of the fundamentals of the underlying business performance and adjustments for items that are not indicative of ongoing results. Such adjustments may include external factors or internal business decisions that may have impacted financial results during the year. For example, EBIT and net revenues are expressed in constant currencies (
i.e.,
excluding the effects of foreign currency translation), since we believe that period-to-period changes in foreign exchange rates can cause our reported results to appear more or less favorable than business fundamentals indicate. AIP funding can range from 0% to a maximum of 175% of the target AIP pool based on the level of attainment of the designated financial measures. The target AIP pool was determined based on the executives’ AIP participation rates. For each executive, the actual 2013 AIP payout was determined within the limits of the AIP funding for 2013 based on this AIP funding level percentage, the executive’s AIP participation rate and individual performance as described below.
94
Individual performance measures
75% of the final AIP funding level percentage as described above under “Performance measures” was allocated based on individual performance. The individual performance payout can range from 0% to a maximum of 160% of the 75% allocated under the AIP pool. For executives other than the CEO, individual performance is based on the CEO’s assessment of the executive's performance against his or her annual objectives and performance relative to his or her peers. The CEO’s individual performance is based on the HR Committee’s assessment of Mr. Bergh’s performance against his annual objectives including the HR Committees assessment of his leadership in 2013. During this decision-making process, the HR Committee consults with its consultant Exequity. Based on all of these inputs, the HR Committee prepares a recommendation to the full Board on the CEO’s individual performance. The full Board then considers the HR Committee's recommendation and approves the final individual performance payout percentage for the CEO. Individual annual objectives include non-financial goals which are not stated in quantitative terms, and a particular weighting is not assigned to any one of these individual goals. The non-financial objectives are not established in terms of how difficult or easy they are to attain; rather, they are taken into account in assessing the overall quality of the individual's performance. For fiscal 2013, these objectives consisted of initiatives that focused on five key behaviors: (1) understanding the Company’s business in the context of the market, (2) owning and delivering on commitments, (3) placing Company success over individual or group success, (4) collaboration, and (5) leading by positive example.
Actual AIP awards
For fiscal
2013
, financial metrics were exceeded, and the AIP pool was funded above target amounts. The table below describes the calculation of the actual bonus for fiscal 2013 for each eligible executive.
|
Name
|
Base Salary
|
x
|
AIP Target
|
x
|
(
|
Actual AIP Funding Level %
|
x
|
Weight
|
+
|
Actual AIP Funding Level %
|
x
|
Individual Performance Payout
|
x
|
Weight
|
)
|
=
|
Actual Bonus
|
|||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
|
x
|
140%
|
x
|
(
|
120%
|
x
|
25%
|
+
|
120%
|
x
|
110%
|
x
|
75%
|
)
|
=
|
$
|
2,257,500
|
|
|
|
Harmit Singh
(1)
|
562,500
|
|
x
|
80%
|
x
|
(
|
120%
|
x
|
25%
|
+
|
120%
|
x
|
110%
|
x
|
75%
|
)
|
=
|
580,500
|
|
|||
|
Kevin Wilson
(2)
|
357,000
|
|
x
|
41%
|
x
|
(
|
120%
|
x
|
25%
|
+
|
120%
|
x
|
120%
|
x
|
75%
|
)
|
=
|
203,274
|
|
|||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
700,000
|
|
x
|
80%
|
x
|
(
|
120%
|
x
|
25%
|
+
|
120%
|
x
|
110%
|
x
|
75%
|
)
|
=
|
722,400
|
|
|||
|
James Curleigh
|
600,000
|
|
x
|
80%
|
x
|
(
|
120%
|
x
|
25%
|
+
|
120%
|
x
|
75%
|
x
|
75%
|
)
|
=
|
468,000
|
|
|||
|
Roy Bagattini
(3)
|
660,410
|
|
x
|
70%
|
x
|
(
|
120%
|
x
|
25%
|
+
|
120%
|
x
|
90%
|
x
|
75%
|
)
|
=
|
513,139
|
|
|||
______________
|
(1)
|
Mr. Singh’s salary is prorated based on his start date. He joined the Company in January 2013.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Wilson served as interim CFO until January 16, 2013. For the purposes of calculating his AIP target, his base salary includes the cash bonuses paid to him in recognition of serving as the interim CFO.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. Bagattini’s salary is paid in Singapore Dollars (SGD) and his AIP target assumes full-year employment, based on the terms of his employment arrangement. For purposes of the table, these amounts were converted into U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 0.8040, which is the average exchange rate for November 2013.
|
Long-Term Incentives
The HR Committee believes a large part of an executive's compensation should be linked to long-term stockholder value creation as an incentive for sustained, profitable growth. Therefore, our long-term incentives for our executives are in the form of equity awards, both performance and time-vested, and provide reward opportunities competitive with those offered by companies in the peer group for similar jobs. Consistent with the other elements of compensation, the HR Committee does not target specific benchmark percentiles for long-term incentive awards for our executives and uses a number of factors in establishing the long-term incentive award levels for each individual including a review of each individual’s accumulated vested and unvested awards, the current and potential realizable value over time using stock appreciation assumptions, vesting schedules, comparison of individual awards between executives and in relation to other compensation elements, market data, shareholder dilution and accounting expense. Should we deliver against our long-term goals, the long-term equity incentive awards become a significant portion of the total compensation of each executive. For more information on the
2013
long-term equity grants, see the
2013
Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. Stock-based awards are granted under our omnibus 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“EIP”) that enables our HR Committee to select from a variety of stock awards, including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, and time-vested as well as performance based stock appreciation rights (“SARs”).
95
Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock settled SARs are the primary form of equity granted to our executives under the EIP with the exception of Mr. Wilson. SARs are typically granted annually (or, in the case of new executives, at the HR Committee meeting held in February or July following the date they join the Company or first become an executive) with four-year vesting periods and exercise periods of up to seven years. (See the table entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at
2013
Fiscal Year-End” for details concerning the SARs' vesting schedule, including any individual variations from the typical four-year vesting period.) The HR Committee chose to grant SARs to align the interests of executives to our stockholders. SARs provide value to the executive only if the price of our stock increases. The terms of the SAR grants made to our executives to-date provide for stock settlement only. When a SAR is exercised and settled in stock, the shares issued are subject to the terms of the Stockholders' Agreement, including restrictions on transfer. After the participant has held the shares issued under the EIP for six months, he or she may require the Company to repurchase, or the Company may require the participant to sell to the Company, those shares of common stock. The Company's obligations under the EIP are subject to certain restrictive covenants in our various debt agreements (See Note
6
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report for more details).
Performance-based SARs
During fiscal year 2012, the HR Committee reviewed the long-term incentive structure for executives with the objective of driving greater accountability for the achievement of the strategic plan of the Company and long-term value creation for stockholders. After considering the factors described under “Policies and Practices for Establishing Compensation Packages” above and the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives, the HR Committee introduced performance-based SARs, which accounted for 40% of each executives’ total 2013 annual SAR grant value. The key features of performance-based SARs are described below:
|
•
|
Each executive is eligible to receive an annual performance-based SAR award. Performance-based SARs give the executive the right (subject to HR Committee discretion to reduce but not increase awards) to vest in a number of SARs based on achievement against performance goals over a three year performance period. Actual shares that will vest, if any, will vary based on achievement of the performance goals at the end of the three years. The three-year performance period was designed to discourage short-term risk taking and reinforce the link between the interests of our stockholders and our executives over the long-term.
|
|
•
|
The number of actual SARs that vest at the end of three years is based on two performance metrics: 1) the Company's average margin of net earnings over the three-year period adjusted for certain items such as interest and taxes, and 2) the target compound annual growth rate in the Company's net revenues over the three-year period. The potential payout range as a percentage of the target award is 0% to 150%. However, in order to vest above 100% of the SARs, our stock must have a fair market value of not less than $50 per share (based on the Evercore valuation process) at the time of the performance determination.
|
|
•
|
If earned at target, 100% of the SARs vest at the end of the three-year performance period.
|
Similar to our SARs that are not performance-based, performance-based SARs that vest will only provide value to the extent that the price of our stock increases.
Interim CFO long-term incentives
Mr. Wilson served as an executive on an interim basis during a portion of the fiscal year. Because of his interim status, he was ineligible to receive SAR grants. However, Mr. Wilson does participate in the following cash-based long-term incentive plans that are in place for all vice president level employees. The Restricted Stock Unit Plan (“RSU”) under our EIP is a full-value, phantom stock plan that is settled in cash. The Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) is based on performance against the Company's three-year internal goals. Awards under both plans vest automatically at the end of their respective three-year performance periods and payments are made in cash.
Long-term incentive grant practices
The Company does not have any program, plan, or practice to time equity grants to take advantage of the release of material, non-public information. The Company's common stock is not listed on any stock exchange. Accordingly, the price of a share of our common stock for all purposes, including setting the grant price of SARs, is established by the Board based on an independent third-party valuation conducted by Evercore Group LLC (“Evercore”). The valuation process is typically conducted two times a year, with interim valuations occurring from time to time based on stockholder and Company needs. Equity grants are made in connection with compensation decisions made by the HR Committee and the timing of the Evercore valuation process, and are made under the terms of the EIP. Please see “Stock-Based Compensation” under Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report for more information about the valuation process.
96
Benefits and Perquisites
Executives generally are eligible for the same health and welfare insurance plans offered to all employees such as medical, dental, supplemental life, long-term disability and business travel insurance. In addition, although not a significant part of total compensation, the Company provides limited perquisites to executives. The primary perquisite provided to the executives is a flexible allowance to cover expenses such as auto-related expenses, financial and tax planning, legal assistance and excess medical costs. Like many of the companies in the peer group, the Company also offers a non-qualified supplement to the 401(k) plan, which is not subject to the IRS and ERISA limitations, through the Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors. The Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors is a U.S. non-qualified, unfunded tax deferred savings plan provided to senior level executives including the named executive officers, and the outside directors.
We entered into an employment arrangement with Mr. Bagattini, who is based in Singapore, in connection with his becoming the Executive Vice President & President, of our Asia Pacific region, to provide him certain benefits under our global assignment program, including a housing allowance to cover the cost of his rent and utilities. In addition, as an Italian citizen, he does not participate in the local retirement plan offered in Singapore. Mr. Bagattini participates in an international supplemental retirement savings plan designed for globally mobile employees. The Company contributes 14% of Mr. Bagattini’s annual base salary on his behalf to such plan. Mr. Bagattini may voluntarily contribute funds to this plan above and beyond what the Company contributes on his behalf. The Company’s contribution is grossed up to provide a tax-advantaged contribution. As a participant under this plan, Mr. Bagattini may direct investments similar to a 401(k) plan. Mr. Bagattini is allowed to make partial withdrawals from the plan two times per calendar year.
The value of the benefits and perquisites received by our executives are described in more detail in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
We have structured our compensation program in a manner intended to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Because our common stock is not registered on any exchange, we are not subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Severance and Change in Control Benefits
The terms of Mr. Bergh’s severance and change in control benefits were determined through negotiations of his employment agreement in 2011 at the time he was hired. As part of these negotiations, the HR Committee determined that the benefits and structure of these benefits were within normal competitive practice, reasonable and appropriate for the circumstances, and necessary to attract Mr. Bergh to the Company. Enhanced termination benefits in the case of a change in control of the Company were included in his employment agreement for the same reasons and to help ensure retention of Mr. Bergh in the case of a potential or actual change in control.
For executives other than Mr. Bergh, we maintain an Executive Severance Plan that is meant to provide a reasonable and competitive level of financial transitional support to executives who are involuntarily terminated. If an executive's employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company due to reduction in force, layoff or position elimination, the executive is eligible for severance payments and benefits. Severance benefits are not payable upon a change in control if the executive is still employed by or offered a comparable position with the surviving entity.
While compensation decisions affect potential payouts under these severance arrangements, these arrangements generally did not affect such decisions as these severance provisions are conditional and may never come into effect.
More information about the severance benefits payable to our named executive officers under the Executive Severance Plan and to Mr. Bergh under his employment agreement is set forth in the sections entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change In Control” and “Employment Contracts.”
Under the 2006 EIP, in the event of a change in control in which the surviving corporation does not assume or continue the outstanding SARs program or substitute similar awards for such outstanding SARs, the vesting schedule of all SARs held by executives that are still employed upon the change in control will be accelerated in full as of a date prior to the effective date of the transaction as the Board determines. This accelerated vesting structure is designed to encourage the executives to remain employed with the Company through the date of the change in control and to ensure that the equity incentives awarded to the executives are not eliminated by the surviving company.
Compensation Committee Report
The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on the review and discussion, the Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
November 24, 2013
.
97
The Human Resources Committee
Robert Eckert (Chair)
Vanessa J. Castagna
Peter E. Haas Jr.
Robert D. Haas
Patricia Salas Pineda
98
SUMMARY COMPENSATION DATA
The following table provides compensation information for (i) our chief executive officer, (ii) our chief financial officer, (iii) our interim chief financial officer, and (iv) three other executive officers who were our most highly compensated executive officers and who were serving as executive officers as of the last day of the fiscal year ended
November 24, 2013
. The table also shows compensation information for fiscal
2012
and fiscal
2011
, which ended
November 25, 2012
, and
November 27, 2011
, respectively, for those current named executive officers who also were named executive officers in either of those years.
|
Name and Principal Position
(1)
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
(2)
|
Option Awards
(3)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
(4)
|
Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
(5)
|
All Other Compensation
(6)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
2013
|
$
|
1,239,615
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
5,824,736
|
|
$
|
2,257,500
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
248,406
|
|
$
|
9,570,257
|
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
1,200,000
|
|
—
|
|
10,159,786
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
—
|
|
141,842
|
|
13,001,628
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
263,077
|
|
1,850,000
|
|
—
|
|
390,575
|
|
—
|
|
192,592
|
|
2,696,244
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Harmit Singh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
2013
|
578,942
|
|
250,000
|
|
1,328,443
|
|
580,500
|
|
—
|
|
187,709
|
|
2,925,594
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Kevin Wilson
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Former Interim Chief Financial Officer and VP, Finance, Americas Commercial Operations
|
2013
|
354,508
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
267,399
|
|
—
|
|
56,170
|
|
678,077
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
328,928
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
181,754
|
|
—
|
|
38,179
|
|
548,861
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Vice President and President, Americas
|
2013
|
694,808
|
|
—
|
|
1,021,884
|
|
848,150
|
|
—
|
|
110,570
|
|
2,675,412
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
626,538
|
|
—
|
|
824,250
|
|
510,300
|
|
—
|
|
162,791
|
|
2,123,879
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
431,731
|
|
—
|
|
424,800
|
|
300,000
|
|
—
|
|
148,729
|
|
1,305,260
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
James Curleigh
|
2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Vice President and President, Global Levi's
|
589,615
|
|
—
|
|
1,021,884
|
|
468,000
|
|
—
|
|
153,629
|
|
2,233,128
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Vice President and President, Asia, Middle East and Africa
|
2013
|
328,465
|
|
254,000
|
|
740,390
|
|
513,139
|
|
—
|
|
275,722
|
|
2,111,716
|
|
|||||||||||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
In September 2011, Mr. Bergh was named the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
|
In August 2012, Mr. Wilson was named the interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Wilson served as the interim Chief Financial Officer until Mr. Singh was appointed as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company on January 16, 2013.
In June 2013, Mr. Bagattini joined the Company as Executive Vice President and President of the Asia Pacific region. At the end of November 2013, Mr. Bagattini's role was expanded to include the Middle East and Africa. Mr. Bagattini’s cash compensation is paid in Singapore Dollars (SGD). For presentation purposes, his compensation was converted into U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 0.8040, which is the average exchange rate for the last month of the Company’s 2013 fiscal year.
|
(2)
|
Mr. Bergh received a new hire sign-on bonus of $1,850,000 in September 2011.
|
Mr. Singh received a new hire sign-on bonus of $250,000 in January 2013.
Mr. Bagattini received the first 50% (SGD 315,925) of a new hire sign-on bonus of $500,000 in June 2013. For presentation purposes, this amount was converted into U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 0.8040, which is the average exchange rate for the last month of the Company’s 2013 fiscal year.
|
(3)
|
These amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of SARs, including performance-based SARs, granted to the recipient under the Company's 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, computed in accordance with the Company's accounting policy for stock-based compensation. These amounts reflect the grant date fair value, and do not represent the actual value that may be realized by the executives. For 2013, this column includes the grant date fair value of the target number of performance-based SARs that may be earned for the three-year performance period beginning with fiscal 2013. For a description of the assumptions used to determine the compensation cost of our awards, see Notes 1 and 11 of the audited consolidated financial statements. Please refer to the Grants of
|
99
Plan-Based Awards table in this report and in our 2012 and 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for information on awards actually granted in fiscal 2012 and 2011.
|
(4)
|
The amounts in this column reflect the non-equity amounts earned by the executives under the Company’s annual incentive plan (“AIP”).
|
For Mr. Wilson, this amount includes a payment of $2,500 under our Long-term Incentive Plan and $61,625 under our Total Shareholder Return Plan. Please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers” for more details.
For Ms. Rohosy, this amount includes a payment of $2,500 under our Long-term Incentive Plan and $123,250 under our Total Shareholder Return Plan in connection with her role prior to becoming a named executive officer.
|
(5)
|
No above-market or preferential interest rate options are available under our deferred compensation programs. Please refer to the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table for additional information on deferred compensation earnings.
|
|
(6)
|
The amounts shown in the All Other Compensation column for fiscal 2013 are detailed in the table below:
|
|
Name
|
Executive Perquisites
(a)
|
Relocation
(b)
|
401(k) Plan Match
(c)
|
Deferred Compensation Match
(d)
|
Tax Payments
(e)
|
Charitable Match
(f)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
$
|
35,098
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
18,750
|
|
$
|
187,058
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
$
|
248,406
|
|
|||||||||
|
Harmit Singh
|
18,749
|
|
123,807
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
45,153
|
|
—
|
|
187,709
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Kevin Wilson
|
10,948
|
|
—
|
|
15,916
|
|
29,306
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
56,170
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
18,948
|
|
7,200
|
|
16,875
|
|
65,547
|
|
—
|
|
2,000
|
|
110,570
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
James Curleigh
|
18,948
|
|
40,677
|
|
18,750
|
|
54,346
|
|
20,908
|
|
—
|
|
153,629
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
80,999
|
|
140,572
|
|
45,126
|
|
—
|
|
9,025
|
|
—
|
|
275,722
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers” for more details on the items in the table above.
|
(a)
|
For Mr. Bergh, this amount reflects a payment for home security services, parking, an allowance of $15,000 intended to cover legal, financial and/or other incidental business related expenses, and a car allowance of $14,890.
|
For Mr. Singh, Mr. Curleigh and Ms. Rohosy, this amount reflects parking and an allowance of $15,000 intended to cover legal, financial and/or or other incidental business related expenses. For Mr. Singh, this also includes a de minimis fringe benefit.
For Mr. Bagattini, this amount reflects parking and a car allowance of $30,480 and $20,646 for a club membership, a typical benefit provided to executives in Singapore and $29,077 for tuition costs for his children, a benefit he received in connection with his international assignment. For presentation purposes, his payments in this table were converted into U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 0.8040, which is the average exchange rate for the last month of the Company’s 2013 fiscal year.
For Mr. Wilson, this amount reflects parking and an allowance of $7,000 intended to cover legal, financial and/or other incidental business related expenses.
|
(b)
|
For Mr. Singh, Mr. Curleigh, and Ms. Rohosy, these amounts reflect costs in connection with relocation assistance. For Mr. Bagattini, this amount reflects $60,755 for costs in connection with relocation assistance and $79,817 for housing and utilities assistance in connection with his international assignment.
|
|
(c)
|
These amounts reflect Company matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) Plan. For Mr. Bagattini, this amount reflects the Company’s contribution to an international supplemental retirement savings plan. For additional information about Mr. Bagattini’s supplemental retirement savings plan, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers.”
|
|
(d)
|
These amounts reflect Company matching contributions under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
(e)
|
For Mr. Singh and Mr. Curleigh, these amounts reflect tax reimbursements in connection with relocation expenses. For Mr. Bagattini this amount reflects tax reimbursements on his contributions to the international supplemental retirement savings plan.
|
|
(f)
|
These amounts reflect Company matching under the Company’s Matching Gift Program, available to all employees.
|
Other Matters
Employment Contracts
Mr. Bergh
. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Bergh effective September 1, 2011. The agreement initially provided for an annual base salary of $1,200,000 and an AIP target participation rate of 135%, which have since been adjusted, and may be further adjusted, pursuant to annual review. For 2013, his base salary and target participation rate under the AIP were
$1,250,000
and
140%
of base salary, respectively.
Mr. Bergh also participates in our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. His employment agreement provides that in fiscal 2013, he was eligible to receive SAR awards with an aggregate grant date value of not less than the median aggregate grant date value of annual long-term incentive awards made to the Chief Executive Officers of the Company's peer group of companies.
His employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Bergh is terminated from employment either by the Company or constructively within four years of his effective date of employment or in connection with a change in control of the Company under certain circumstances, he will be entitled to receive, among other standard benefits, (1) an aggregate amount equal to two times the sum of his then-effective base salary plus his then-effective target AIP amount, (2) a prorated AIP award in respect of the performance period at the time, and (3) company-paid continuation coverage for certain benefits for 18 months. In addition,
100
upon his termination from the Company at any time under certain circumstances, the unvested portion of his SAR awards that would have vested during the 24 months following the date of such termination will immediately vest, and all vested SAR awards shall be exercisable for 18 months following such termination. Upon his termination in connection with a change in control of the Company under certain circumstances, 100% of his SAR awards will immediately vest, and all vested SAR awards shall be exercisable for 18 months following such event. If he resigns from the Company after the fifth anniversary of his effective date of employment, 100% of his SAR awards that have remained outstanding for at least 12 months will immediately vest, and all vested SAR awards shall be exercisable for 18 months following such resignation.
Mr. Bergh's right to any severance or vesting acceleration is subject to his execution of an effective release of claims in favor of the Company and compliance with certain restrictive covenants.
Mr. Bergh is eligible to receive standard healthcare, life insurance and long-term savings program benefits, as well as relocation program benefits. He also receives benefits under the Company's various executive perquisite programs consistent with that provided to his predecessor.
Mr. Bergh's employment is at-will and may be terminated by the Company or by him at any time. Mr. Bergh does not receive any separate compensation for his services as a member of our Board.
Mr. Singh.
We have an employment arrangement with Mr. Singh effective January 16, 2013.
It provides for his annual base salary and participation in our AIP, which are subject to annual review and adjustment, and his participation in our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These elements of Mr. Singh's compensation for 2013 are reflected and discussed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers." Under this arrangement, he also received a one-time signing bonus of $250,000 which is subject to prorated repayment if his employment with the Company does not exceed twenty-four months under certain conditions.
Mr. Singh also receives standard healthcare, life insurance and long-term savings program benefits, as well as benefits under our various executive perquisite programs.
Mr. Singh’s employment is at-will and may be terminated by the Company or by Mr. Singh at any time.
Mr. Wilson
.
We have an employment arrangement with Mr. Wilson effective June 19, 2006. It initially provided for an annualized base salary of $190,000 and an AIP participation rate of 30%, both of which have since been adjusted, and may be further adjusted, pursuant to annual review. These and other elements of Mr. Wilson's compensation for 2013 are reflected and discussed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers."
Mr. Wilson also receives standard healthcare, life insurance and long-term savings program benefits, as well as benefits under our various executive perquisite programs.
Mr. Wilson's employment is at-will and may be terminated by us or by Mr. Wilson at any time.
Ms. Rohosy
. We have an employment arrangement with Ms. Rohosy effective May 9, 2011. It initially provided for an annualized base salary of $350,000 and an AIP participation rate of 40%, both of which have since been adjusted, and may be further adjusted, pursuant to annual review. The arrangement also provides for her participation in our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These elements of Ms. Rohosy's compensation for 2013 are reflected and discussed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers."
Ms. Rohosy also receives standard healthcare, life insurance and long-term savings program benefits, as well as benefits under our various executive perquisite programs.
Ms. Rohosy's employment is at-will and may be terminated by us or by Ms. Rohosy at any time.
Mr. Curleigh
. We have an employment arrangement with Mr. Curleigh effective July 5, 2011. The arrangement initially provided for an annual base salary of $550,000 and an AIP participation rate of 70%, both of which have since been adjusted, and may be further adjusted, pursuant to annual review. The arrangement also provides for his participation in our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These elements of Mr. Curleigh's compensation for 2013 are reflected and discussed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers." Under this arrangement, Mr. Curleigh received a one-time sign-on bonus that is subject to prorated repayment if his employment with the Company does not exceed 24 months under certain conditions.
Mr. Curleigh also receives standard healthcare, life insurance and long-term savings program benefits, as well as benefits under our various executive perquisite programs.
Mr. Curleigh’s employment is at-will and may be terminated by us or by Mr. Curleigh at any time.
Mr. Bagattini.
We have an employment arrangement with Mr. Bagattini effective June 3, 2013. He is on assignment in Singapore. His arrangement provides for his annual base salary and participation in our AIP, which are subject to annual review
101
and adjustment, and his participation in our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These elements of Mr. Bagattini's compensation for 2013 are reflected and discussed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers." Under this arrangement, he received a signing bonus of $500,000 to be paid in two installments. The first installment of $250,000 has already been paid. The second installment of $250,000 will be made following the end of the 12
th
month from his start date. This payment is subject to a prorated repayment if his employment with the Company does not exceed 24 months under certain conditions.
He is eligible to receive benefits under our global assignment program, including, education association fees and a housing allowance of up to approximately $18,000 per month to cover the cost of his rental and utilities.
Mr. Bagattini also receives standard healthcare, life insurance, and long-term savings program benefits, as well as benefits under our various executive perquisite programs.
Mr. Bagattini’s employment is at-will and may be terminated by us or by Mr. Bagattini upon 3 months' notice or pay in lieu of notice.
2013
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information on all plan-based awards granted to each of our named executive officers during the year ended
November 24, 2013
. The awards and the unvested portion of stock appreciation rights ("SARs") identified below are also reported in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table.
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) |
All Other Option Awards
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Threshold
($)
|
Target
($)
|
Maximum
($)
|
Threshold
(#)
|
Target
(#)
|
Maximum
(#)
|
Number of Securities Underlying Options
(3)
(#)
|
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
(4)
($)
|
Full Grant Date Fair Value
(5)
($)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
N/A
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,750,000
|
|
$
|
3,500,000
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
95,959
|
|
191,919
|
|
287,878
|
|
$
|
37.75
|
|
$
|
2,352,927
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
287,878
|
|
37.75
|
|
3,471,809
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Harmit Singh
|
N/A
|
—
|
|
450,000
|
|
900,000
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
21,885
|
|
43,771
|
|
65,656
|
|
37.75
|
|
536,632
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
65,656
|
|
37.75
|
|
791,811
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kevin Wilson
|
N/A
|
—
|
|
147,300
|
|
294,600
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
N/A
|
—
|
|
560,000
|
|
1,120,000
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
16,835
|
|
33,670
|
|
50,505
|
|
37.75
|
|
412,794
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
50,505
|
|
37.75
|
|
609,090
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
James Curleigh
|
N/A
|
—
|
|
480,000
|
|
960,000
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
—
|
|
16,835
|
|
33,670
|
|
50,505
|
|
37.75
|
|
412,794
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/6/2013
|
50,505
|
|
37.75
|
|
609,090
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
N/A
|
—
|
|
462,280
|
|
924,559
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7/11/2013
|
10,733
|
|
21,467
|
|
32,200
|
|
59.25
|
|
314,062
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7/11/2013
|
32,200
|
|
59.25
|
|
426,328
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
The amounts shown in these columns reflect the estimated potential payment levels for the fiscal 2013 performance period under the Company’s annual incentive plan (the “AIP”), further described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers.” The potential payouts were performance-based and, therefore, were completely at risk. The potential target and maximum payment amounts assume achievement of 100% and 160%, respectively, of the individual objectives of the AIP. There were no threshold payment amounts for fiscal 2013 under the AIP. Each named executive officer received a bonus under the AIP, which is reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the column entitled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation."
|
|
(2)
|
For each named executive officer, the amounts shown in these columns reflect, in shares, the threshold, target and maximum amounts for performance-based SARs subject to a three-year performance period beginning in fiscal 2013 that is further described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers.” The potential awards are performance-based and, therefore, completely at risk.
|
|
(3)
|
Reflects SARs granted in 2013 under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
(4)
|
The exercise price is based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock as of the grant date established by the Evercore valuation process.
|
102
|
(5)
|
The value of an option award is based on the fair value as of the grant date of such award determined in accordance with the Company's accounting policy for stock-based compensation for awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plan. Please refer to Notes 1 and 11 of the audited consolidated financial statements for the relevant assumptions used to determine the valuation of our option awards. Values for future payouts of performance-based SARs reflect the aggregate grant date fair value based on target award achievement. If maximum performance conditions are achieved over the entire three-year period, the grant date fair values would be $3,529,384 for Mr. Bergh, $804,943 for Mr. Singh, $619,191 for Ms. Rohosy, $619,191 for Mr. Curleigh, and $471,086 for Mr. Bagattini.
|
Mr. Wilson received a 2012 grant under the Phantom Restricted Stock Unit Plan ("PRSU"), the Company's cash-settled equity-based phantom stock plan, as detailed below. The plan has a three-year vesting period and a mandatory cash-out at the end of the period, based on full-value shares at the end of the three-year performance period. Like the SARs, the share price is also determined by the Board based on the Evercore valuation process.
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Number of PRSUs
|
Grant Value
(1)
|
Payment Date
|
|||||||||
|
Kevin Wilson
|
2/6/2013
|
1,986
|
|
$
|
74,971
|
|
Feb. 2016
|
||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
The grant value is based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock as of the grant date established by the Evercore valuation process.
|
Mr. Wilson also received a grant under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Company's cash-settled long-term bonus plan, as detailed below. The plan has a three-year vesting period and a mandatory cash-out at the end of the period, based on the three-year performance goals established by the Board on the grant date.
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Target Amount
|
Payment Date
|
|||||||
|
Kevin Wilson
|
2/6/2013
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Feb. 2016
|
|||||
103
Outstanding Equity Awards at
2013
Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by each of our named executive officers as of
November 24, 2013
. The vesting schedule for each grant is shown following this table.
|
SAR Awards
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised SARs Exercisable
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised SARs Unexercisable
(2)
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
(3)
|
SAR Exercise Price
(4)
|
SAR Expiration Date
|
|||||||||||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
245,655
|
|
191,065
|
|
(a)
|
$
|
32.00
|
|
2/2/2019
|
|
||||||||
|
228,646
|
|
270,218
|
|
(b)
|
32.00
|
|
2/2/2019
|
|
||||||||||
|
—
|
|
287,878
|
|
(c)
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
||||||||||
|
—
|
|
191,919
|
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Harmit Singh
|
—
|
|
65,656
|
|
(c)
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
|||||||||
|
—
|
|
43,771
|
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Kevin Wilson
(1)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
1,875
|
|
11,875
|
|
(d)
|
39.50
|
|
7/14/2018
|
|
|||||||||
|
4,688
|
|
40,625
|
|
(b)
|
32.00
|
|
2/2/2019
|
|
||||||||||
|
—
|
|
50,505
|
|
(c)
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
||||||||||
|
—
|
|
33,670
|
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
|||||||||||
|
James Curleigh
|
18,346
|
|
33,455
|
|
(e)
|
33.00
|
|
7/12/2019
|
|
|||||||||
|
—
|
|
50,505
|
|
(c)
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
||||||||||
|
—
|
|
33,670
|
|
37.75
|
|
2/5/2020
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
—
|
|
32,200
|
|
(f)
|
59.25
|
|
7/11/2020
|
|
|||||||||
|
—
|
|
21,467
|
|
59.25
|
|
7/11/2020
|
|
|||||||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
Mr. Wilson was not eligible for SAR awards.
|
|
(2)
|
The following sets forth the vesting schedule for the outstanding SAR awards and generally depends upon continued employment:
|
|
(a)
|
SARs vest 25% on 9/1/2012 and then monthly over the remaining 36 months.
|
|
(b)
|
SARs vest 25% on 2/1/2013 and then monthly over the remaining 36 months.
|
|
(c)
|
SARs vest 25% on 2/5/14 and then monthly over the remaining 36 months.
|
|
(d)
|
SARs vest 25% on 7/13/12 and then monthly over the remaining 36 months.
|
|
(e)
|
SARs vest 25% on 7/11/13 and then monthly over the remaining 36 months.
|
|
(f)
|
SARs vest 25% on 7/10/14 and then monthly over the remaining 36 months.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the target number of SARs that may be earned under the performance-based SAR award program (see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers" for more details) that vest at the end of the three-year performance period. The total number of SARs that could vest if the maximum performance is achieved over the three-year performance period for each named executive is as follows: Mr. Bergh (287,878), Mr. Singh (65,656), Ms. Rohosy (50,505), Mr. Curleigh (50,505) and Mr. Bagattini (32,200).
|
|
(4)
|
The SAR exercise prices reflect the fair market value of the Company's common stock as of the grant date as established by the Evercore valuation process.
|
104
Option Exercises
The following table shows all SARs exercised and the value realized upon exercise by each of our named executive officers for the year ended
November 24, 2013
.
|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
Value Realized on Exercise
($)
|
||||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Harmit Singh
|
—
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Kevin Wilson
|
—
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
45,937
|
1,129,908
|
|
|||||
|
James Curleigh
|
—
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
—
|
—
|
|
|||||
Executive Retirement Plans
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
The Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors (“Deferred Compensation Plan”) is a U.S. non-qualified, unfunded deferred tax effective savings plan provided to the executives, among other executives and the directors, as part of competitive compensation.
Participants may elect to defer all or a portion of their base salary and AIP payment and may elect an in-service and/or retirement distribution. Executive officers who defer salary or bonus under this plan are credited with market-based returns depending upon the investment choices made by the executive applicable to each deferral. The investment options under the plan, which closely mirror the options provided under our qualified 401(k) plan, include a number of mutual funds with varying risk and return profiles. Participants may change their investment choices as frequently as they desire, consistent with our 401(k) plan.
In addition, under the Deferred Compensation Plan, the Company provides a match on all deferrals, up to 10% of eligible compensation that cannot be provided under the qualified 401(k) plan due to IRS qualified plan compensation limits. The amounts in the table below reflect non-qualified contributions over the 401(k) limit by the executive officers and the resulting Company match.
The table below provides information on the non-qualified deferred compensation activity for each of our named executive officers for the year ended
November 24, 2013
.
|
Year Ended November 24, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Company Contributions
(1)
|
Executive Contributions
|
Aggregate Earnings
|
Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions
|
Aggregate Balance at November 24, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
$
|
187,058
|
|
$
|
149,646
|
|
$
|
8,468
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
602,175
|
|
|||||||
|
Harmit Singh
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Kevin Wilson
|
29,306
|
|
82,452
|
|
4,322
|
|
—
|
|
404,997
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
65,547
|
|
969,919
|
|
39,185
|
|
—
|
|
2,396,687
|
|
||||||||||||
|
James Curleigh
|
54,346
|
|
43,477
|
|
784
|
|
—
|
|
104,533
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Roy Bagattini
(2)
|
54,151
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
54,151
|
|
||||||||||||
______________
|
(1)
|
For Messrs. Bergh, Wilson, Curleigh, and Ms. Rohosy, these amounts reflect the deferred compensation plan match contributions made by the Company and are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Bagattini participates in an international supplemental retirement savings plan designed for globally mobile employees. The Company contributes 14% of Mr. Bagattini's annual base salary on his behalf to such plan. The Company’s contribution is grossed up to provide a tax-advantaged contribution. For additional detail, please refer to the section entitled Benefits and Perquisites in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Named Executive Officers.”
|
105
Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change In Control
On June 9, 2011, the Company and Charles V. Bergh, our President and CEO, executed an employment agreement in connection with Mr. Bergh joining the Company. The employment agreement provides that if Mr. Bergh is involuntarily terminated without Cause, or Mr. Bergh terminates his employment for Good Reason, other than in connection with a Change in Control of the Company (each as defined in the Employment Agreement) within four years of his effective date of employment, he will be entitled to receive, among other standard benefits, (1) an aggregate amount equal to two times the sum of his then-effective base salary plus his then-effective target AIP amount, (2) a prorated AIP award in respect of the performance period at the time, and (3) company-paid continuation coverage for certain benefits for 18 months. In addition, the unvested portion of his SAR awards that would have vested during the 24 months following the date of such termination will immediately vest, and all vested SAR awards will be exercisable for 18 months following such termination.
Mr. Bergh's right to any severance or vesting acceleration is subject to his execution of an effective release of claims in favor of the Company and compliance with certain restrictive covenants.
Following the expiration of such four-year anniversary, in lieu of the payments and benefits described above, Mr. Bergh will participate in any severance policy applicable to the other senior executives of the Company in effect at such time in accordance with the terms of such policy.
The named executive officers, other than the CEO, are eligible to receive certain benefits and payments upon their separation from the Company under certain circumstances under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan for U.S. executives and the Equity Incentive Plan.
In
2013
, our U.S. severance arrangements under our Executive Severance Plan offered the named executive officers, except Mr. Bergh, Mr. Bagattini and Mr. Wilson, basic severance of two weeks of base salary and, subject to execution of a General Release Agreement, enhanced severance of 78 weeks of base salary plus the beneficiaries' AIP target amount, if their employment ceases due to a reduction in force, layoff or position elimination. Mr. Bagattini, under local Singapore law, is eligible for three months annual base salary plus a month of base salary for every year of service, which for 2013 is prorated to one half month based on his start date. Mr. Wilson was eligible for basic severance of two weeks of base salary, enhanced severance of 26 weeks of base salary plus his AIP target amount, plus two additional weeks of base salary plus his AIP target for each year of service in excess of five years of service up to an additional 52 weeks. We also cover the cost of the COBRA health coverage premium for the duration of the executive's severance payment period, up to a maximum of 18 months. The COBRA premium coverage is shared between the individual and the Company at the same shared percentage that was effective during the executive's employment. We also provide life insurance, career counseling and transition services. These severance benefits would not be payable upon a change in control if the executive is still employed or offered a comparable position with the surviving entity.
Under the Equity Incentive Plan, in the event of a change in control in which the surviving corporation does not assume or continue the outstanding SARs or substitute similar awards for the outstanding SARs, the vesting schedule of all SARs held by executives that are still employed will be accelerated in full to a date prior to the effective time of the transaction as determined by the Board. If the SARs are not exercised at or prior to the effective time of the transaction, all rights to exercise them will terminate, and any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by the Company with respect to such SARs shall lapse.
The information in the tables below reflects the estimated value of the compensation to be paid by us to each of the named executive officers in the event of termination or a change in control. The amounts shown below assume that each named individual was employed and that a termination or change in control was effective as of
November 24, 2013
. The actual amounts that would be paid can only be determined at the time of an actual termination event. The amounts also assume a share price of $64.50 for the SAR grants, which is based on the Evercore share valuation dated as of December 31,
2013
.
106
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination
|
Voluntary Termination
|
Retirement
|
Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
|
For Cause
Termination
|
Change of Control
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Compensation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Severance
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
7,750,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
7,750,000
|
|
|||||
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
35,185,608
|
|
—
|
|
43,241,050
|
|
||||||||||
|
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COBRA & Life Insurance
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,649
|
|
—
|
|
5,649
|
|
||||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on Mr. Bergh's annual salary of $1,250,000, his AIP target of 140% of his base salary and the termination provisions in his employment contract.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects 18 months of a COBRA subsidy and life insurance premiums at the same Company/employee percentage sharing as during employment. Mr. Bergh is also eligible for a COBRA subsidy should termination occur due to a change in control, based on his employment contract.
|
|
Harmit Singh
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination
|
Voluntary Termination
|
Retirement
|
Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
|
For Cause
Termination
|
Change of Control
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Compensation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Severance
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,848,462
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,927,172
|
|
||||||||||
|
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COBRA & Life Insurance
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,649
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on Mr. Singh's annual base salary of
$675,000
and his AIP target of
80%
of his base salary.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects 18 months of a COBRA subsidy and life insurance premiums at the same Company/employee percentage sharing as during employment.
|
|
Kevin Wilson
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination
|
Voluntary Termination
|
Retirement
|
Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
|
For Cause
Termination
|
Change of Control
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Compensation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Severance
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
264,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COBRA & Life Insurance
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,649
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on Mr. Wilson's annual base salary of
$312,000
and his AIP target of 40% of his base salary.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects 18 months of a COBRA subsidy and life insurance premiums at the same Company/employee percentage sharing as during employment.
|
107
|
Anne Rohosy
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination
|
Voluntary Termination
|
Retirement
|
Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
|
For Cause
Termination
|
Change of Control
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Compensation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Severance
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,916,923
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,068,104
|
|
||||||||||
|
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COBRA & Life Insurance
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,649
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on Ms. Rohosy's annual base salary of
$700,000
and her AIP target of
80%
of her base salary.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects 18 months of a COBRA subsidy and life insurance premiums at the same Company/employee percentage sharing as during employment.
|
|
James Curleigh
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination
|
Voluntary Termination
|
Retirement
|
Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
|
For Cause
Termination
|
Change of Control
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Compensation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Severance
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,643,077
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,883,413
|
|
||||||||||
|
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COBRA & Life Insurance
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,649
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on Mr. Curleigh’s annual base salary of $600,000 and his AIP target of 80% of his base salary.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects 18 months of a COBRA subsidy and life insurance premiums at the same Company/employee percentage sharing as during employment.
|
|
Roy Bagattini
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination
|
Voluntary Termination
|
Retirement
|
Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
|
For Cause
Termination
|
Change of Control
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Compensation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Severance
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
192,620
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
281,752
|
|
||||||||||
|
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COBRA & Life Insurance
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Based on three months of Mr. Bagattini’s annual base salary expressed in U.S. Dollars of
$660,410
as notice pay and one-half month of salary based on years of service, in accordance with local Singapore provisions.
|
108
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table provides compensation information for our directors who were not employees in fiscal
2013
:
|
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
|
Stock Awards
(1)
|
All Other Compensation
(2)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
Stephen C. Neal
(3)
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
$
|
224,972
|
|
$
|
8,745
|
|
$
|
433,717
|
|
||||||
|
Robert D. Haas
(4)
|
100,000
|
|
124,958
|
|
210,043
|
|
435,001
|
|
||||||||||
|
Fernando Aguirre
(5)
|
119,168
|
|
124,958
|
|
11,889
|
|
256,015
|
|
||||||||||
|
Troy Alstead
|
118,333
|
|
124,958
|
|
2,376
|
|
245,667
|
|
||||||||||
|
Jill Beraud
(6)
|
75,000
|
|
166,634
|
|
—
|
|
241,634
|
|
||||||||||
|
Vanessa J. Castagna
|
100,000
|
|
124,958
|
|
4,950
|
|
229,908
|
|
||||||||||
|
Robert A. Eckert
(7)
|
115,000
|
|
124,958
|
|
6,039
|
|
245,997
|
|
||||||||||
|
Spencer Fleischer
(8)
|
41,667
|
|
124,958
|
|
—
|
|
166,625
|
|
||||||||||
|
Peter E. Haas, Jr.
|
100,000
|
|
124,958
|
|
4,950
|
|
229,908
|
|
||||||||||
|
Leon J. Level
(9)
|
10,000
|
|
—
|
|
4,950
|
|
14,950
|
|
||||||||||
|
Patricia Salas Pineda
(10)
|
110,000
|
|
124,958
|
|
14,298
|
|
249,256
|
|
||||||||||
___________
|
(1)
|
These amounts, from RSUs granted under the Equity Incentive Plan in
2013
, reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with the Company's accounting policy for stock-based compensation. The following table shows the aggregate number of RSUs outstanding but unexercised at fiscal year-end for those who were directors at fiscal year-end, including RSUs that were vested but deferred and RSUs that were not vested:
|
|
Name
|
Aggregate Outstanding RSUs
|
||
|
Stephen C. Neal
|
12,275
|
||
|
Robert D. Haas
|
7,555
|
||
|
Fernando Aguirre
|
6,844
|
||
|
Troy Alstead
|
5,716
|
||
|
Jill Beraud
|
3,213
|
||
|
Vanessa J. Castagna
|
6,725
|
||
|
Robert A. Eckert
|
11,311
|
||
|
Spencer Fleischer
|
2,109
|
||
|
Peter E. Haas, Jr.
|
6,694
|
||
|
Leon J. Level
|
—
|
||
|
Patricia Salas Pineda
|
12,462
|
||
|
(2)
|
This column includes the aggregate grant date fair value of dividend equivalents provided to each director in fiscal
2013
in the following amounts:
|
|
Name
|
Fair Value of Dividend Equivalent RSUs Granted
|
||||
|
Stephen C. Neal
|
$
|
8,745
|
|
||
|
Robert D. Haas
|
5,511
|
|
|||
|
Fernando Aguirre
|
4,389
|
|
|||
|
Troy Alstead
|
2,376
|
|
|||
|
Jill Beraud
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Vanessa J. Castagna
|
4,950
|
|
|||
|
Robert A. Eckert
|
6,039
|
|
|||
|
Spencer Fleischer
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Peter E. Haas, Jr.
|
4,950
|
|
|||
|
Leon J. Level
|
4,950
|
|
|||
|
Patricia Salas Pineda
|
6,798
|
|
|||
|
(3)
|
Mr. Neal is the Chairman of the Board. Mr. Neal elected to defer 100% of his director's fees under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes charitable matches of $10,000 and administrative support services valued at $165,315, provision of a car at a value of $10,710, use of an office at a value of $16,503, and home security services for his services as Chairman Emeritus.
|
109
|
(5)
|
Mr. Aguirre's 2013 amount includes charitable matches of $7,500.
|
|
(6)
|
On February 6, 2013, the Board elected Ms. Beraud to the Board effective as of that date. On April 11, 2013, Ms. Beraud received a prorated grant of 1,104 RSUs with a grant date value of $37.75 per share for a total value of $41,676. On July 11, 2013, Ms. Beraud received a grant of 2,109 RSUs with a grant date value of $59.25 per share for a total value of $124,958.
|
|
(7)
|
Mr. Eckert elected to defer 100% of his director's fees under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
(8)
|
On July 11, 2013, the Board elected Mr. Fleischer to the Board effective as of that date.
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Level retired from the Board on December 30, 2012.
|
|
(10)
|
Ms. Pineda's
2013
amount includes charitable matches of $7,500.
|
Board compensation is reviewed by the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee and approved by the Board. In fiscal 2013, director compensation consisted of an annual retainer paid in cash and equity compensation in the form of RSUs. Committee chairpersons also received an additional cash retainer, as described below.
Annual Cash Retainer
In fiscal 2013, each non-employee director received compensation consisting of an annual cash retainer fee of $100,000 and was eligible to participate in the provisions of the Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors that apply to directors. In
2013
, Mr. Eckert and Mr. Neal participated in this Deferred Compensation Plan.
Equity Compensation
In fiscal 2013, each non-employee director also received an annual equity award in the form of RSUs which are granted under the Equity Incentive Plan. In July 2013, the Board approved an increase to the annual equity award value in the form of RSUs granted under the Equity Incentive Plan from $100,000 to $125,000. RSU recipients have target stock ownership guidelines of $300,000 worth of equity ownership within five years of participation in the program. The value of the RSUs is tracked against the Company's share prices, established by the Evercore valuation process.
RSUs are units, representing beneficial ownership interests, corresponding in number and value to a specified number of underlying shares of stock. The RSUs vest in three equal installments after thirteen, twenty-four and thirty-six months following the grant date. After the recipient of the RSU has held the shares for six months, he or she may require the Company to repurchase, or the Company may require the participant to sell to the Company, those shares of common stock. If the director's service terminates for reason other than cause after the first, but prior to full, vesting period then any unvested portion of the award will fully vest as of the date of such termination. In addition, each director's initial RSU grant includes a deferral delivery feature, under which the director will not receive the vested awards until six months following the cessation of service on the Board.
Under the terms of the Equity Incentive Plan, recipients of RSUs receive additional grants as a dividend equivalent when the Board declares a dividend to all stockholders. Therefore, all directors who held RSUs as of December 17, 2012, received additional RSUs as a dividend equivalent. Dividend equivalents are subject to all the terms and conditions of the underlying Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement to which they relate.
Compensation of Committee Chairpersons
In addition to the compensation described above, committee chairpersons receive an additional retainer fee in the amount of $20,000 for the Audit Committee and the Human Resources Committee. Effective July 2013, the Board approved an increase in the annual retainer for the chairpersons of the Finance Committee and the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee from $10,000 to $15,000.
Mr. Neal is the Chairman of the Board. As the Chairman of the Board, he is entitled to receive an additional annual retainer in the amount of $200,000, 50% of which is paid in cash and 50% of which is paid in the form of RSUs. The Chairman may also receive the additional retainers attributable to committee chairmanship if applicable.
Robert D. Haas is Chairman Emeritus of the Board, and in that role receives support in form of an office, related administrative support, a leased car with driver and home security services.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Human Resources Committee serves as the compensation committee of our Board. Its members are Mr. Eckert (Chair), Ms. Castagna, Mr. P.E. Haas Jr., Mr. R.D. Haas, and Ms. Pineda. In
2013
, no member of the Human Resources Committee was a current officer or employee of ours. Mr. R.D. Haas served as our Chief Executive Officer from 1984 to 1999. There are no compensation committee interlocks between us and other entities involving our executive officers and our Board members who serve as executive officers of those other entities.
110
|
Item 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Our common stock is primarily owned by descendants of the family of Levi Strauss and their relatives. Shares of our common stock are not publicly held or traded. All shares are subject to a stockholders' agreement. The agreement, which expires in April 2016, limits the transfer of shares and certificates to other holders, family members, specified charities and foundations and back to the Company.
The following table contains information about the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of
February 6, 2014
, by:
|
•
|
Each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock;
|
|
•
|
Each of our directors and each of our named executive officers; and
|
|
•
|
All of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which that person has no economic interest. Except as described in the footnotes to the table below, the individuals named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.
As of
February 6, 2014
, there were
281
record holders of common stock. The percentage of beneficial ownership shown in the table is based on
37,446,988
shares of common stock outstanding as of
February 6, 2014
. The business address of all persons listed is 1155 Battery Street, San Francisco, California 94111.
|
Name
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Percentage of Shares Outstanding
|
|||||
|
Miriam L. Haas
|
6,547,314
|
|
17.48
|
%
|
|||
|
Peter E. Haas Jr.
|
6,025,458
|
|
(1)
|
16.09
|
%
|
||
|
Margaret E. Haas
|
4,354,330
|
|
(2)
|
11.63
|
%
|
||
|
Robert D. Haas
|
3,953,424
|
|
(3)
|
10.56
|
%
|
||
|
Peter E. Haas Jr. Family Fund
|
2,911,770
|
|
(4)
|
7.78
|
%
|
||
|
Fernando Aguirre
|
2,765
|
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Troy Alstead
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Jill Beraud
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Vanessa J. Castagna
|
12,122
|
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Robert A. Eckert
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Spencer Fleischer
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Stephen C. Neal
|
14,954
|
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Patricia Salas Pineda
|
6,461
|
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
325,404
|
|
(5)
|
*
|
|
||
|
Harmit Singh
(6)
|
8,509
|
|
(6)
|
*
|
|
||
|
Kevin Wilson
(7)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Anne Rohosy
|
24,448
|
|
(8)
|
*
|
|
||
|
James Curleigh
|
17,613
|
|
(9)
|
*
|
|
||
|
Roy Bagattini
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons)
|
10,492,470
|
|
(10)
|
28.02
|
%
|
||
|
* Less than 1%.
|
|||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Includes 2,911,770 shares held by the Peter E. Haas Jr. Family Fund, of which Mr. Haas is Vice President, for the benefit of charitable entities. Includes an aggregate of 1,086,140 shares held by the spouse of Mr. Haas and by trusts, of which Mr. Haas is trustee, for the benefit of his children, grandchildren and stepdaughters. Mr. Haas disclaims beneficial ownership of all the foregoing shares.
|
111
|
(2)
|
Includes 1,017,966 shares held in trusts and a limited liability company, of which Ms. Haas is trustee and managing member, respectively, for the benefit of Ms. Haas' son. Includes 886,122 shares held by the Margaret E. Haas Fund and 84,468 shares held by the Lynx Foundation, of which Ms. Haas is a board member, for the benefit of charitable entities. Ms. Haas disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the foregoing shares.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes an aggregate of 328,651 shares owned by the spouse of Mr. Haas and by trusts, of which Mr. Haas is trustee, for the benefit of their daughter. Mr. Haas disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the foregoing shares.
|
|
(4)
|
Peter E. Haas Jr. is a Vice President of this fund. The shares are also included in Mr. Haas' ownership amounts as referenced above.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 325,404 shares that Mr. Bergh has the right to acquire pursuant to outstanding SARs that may be exercised within 60 days of
February 6, 2014
.
|
|
(6)
|
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer effective
January 16, 2013
. Includes 8,509 shares that Mr. Singh has the right to acquire pursuant to outstanding SARs that may be exercised within 60 days of
February 6, 2014
.
|
|
(7)
|
Served as interim Chief Financial Officer until the appointment of Harmit Singh as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer effective
January 16, 2013
.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes 14,540 shares that Ms. Rohosy has the right to acquire pursuant to outstanding SARs that may be exercised within 60 days of
February 6, 2014
.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes 17,613 shares that Mr. Curleigh has the right to acquire pursuant to outstanding SARs that may be exercised within 60 days of
February 6, 2014
.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes 467,378 shares that our executive officers have the right to acquire pursuant to outstanding SARs that may be exercised within 60 days of
February 6, 2014
.
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain information, as of
November 24, 2013
, with respect to the EIP, our only equity compensation plan. This plan was approved by our stockholders. See Note
11
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report for more information about the EIP.
|
Number of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(1)
|
Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(2)
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(1)
|
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
(3)
|
|||||
|
2,626,932
|
1,147,571
|
$36.32
|
—
|
|||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Includes only dilutive SARs.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the number of shares of common stock the dilutive SARs would convert to if exercised
November 24, 2013
, calculated based on the conversion formula as defined in the plan and the fair market value of our common stock on that date as determined by an independent third-party.
|
|
(3)
|
Calculated based on the number of stock awards authorized upon the adoption of the EIP, less the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding dilutive SARs, less shares issued in connection with converted RSUs; does not reflect
75,000
securities expected to be issued in the future upon conversion of outstanding RSUs. The EIP permits the issuance of up to 700,000 shares. The
1,147,571
shares in the table above reflects the potential number of shares which could be issued pursuant to outstanding awards. However, only 167,849 shares have actually been issued pursuant to the EIP as of
November 24, 2013
. Note that the following shares may return to the EIP and be available for issuance in connection with a future award: (i) shares covered by an award that expires or otherwise terminates without having been exercised in full; (ii) shares that are forfeited or repurchased by us prior to becoming fully vested; (iii) shares covered by an award that is settled in cash; (iv) shares withheld to cover payment of an exercise price or cover applicable tax withholding obligations; (v) shares tendered to cover payment of an exercise price; and (vi) shares that are cancelled pursuant to an exchange or repricing program.
|
Stockholders' Agreement
Our common stock is primarily owned by descendants of the family of Levi Strauss and their relatives and are not publicly held or traded. All shares are subject to a stockholders' agreement. The agreement, which expires in April 2016, limits the transfer of shares and certificates to other holders, family members, specified charities and foundations and to the Company. The agreement does not provide for registration rights or other contractual devices for forcing a public sale of shares or certificates, or other access to liquidity.
|
Item 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
Robert D. Haas, a director and Chairman Emeritus of our board of directors, is the President of the Levi Strauss Foundation, which is not a consolidated entity of the Company. During
2013
, we donated
$4.2 million
to the Levi Strauss Foundation.
Peter E. Haas Jr., a director of the Company, is the President of the Red Tab Foundation, which is not a consolidated entity of the Company. During
2013
, the Company donated
$0.1 million
to the Red Tab Foundation.
Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions
We have a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of director and officer questionnaires and a review of any payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Any
112
business transactions or commercial relationships between the Company and any director, stockholder, or any of their immediate family members, are reviewed by the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee of the board and must be approved by at least a majority of the disinterested members of the board. Business transactions or commercial relationships between the Company and named executive officers who are not directors or any of their immediate family members requires approval of the chief executive officer with reporting to the Audit Committee.
Director Independence Policy
Although our shares are not registered on a national securities exchange, we review and take into consideration the director independence criteria required by both the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ Stock Market in determining the independence of our directors on an annual basis. In addition, the charters of our board committees prohibit members from having any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of their independence from management and the Company. The fact that a director may own stock in the Company is not, by itself, considered an "interference" with independence under the committee charters. Family stockholders or other family member directors are not eligible for membership on the Audit Committee. These independence standards are disclosed on our website at
http://www.levistrauss.com/investors/corporate-governance
. Except as described below, all of our directors are independent under the independence criteria required by the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ Stock Market.
Charles V. Bergh, who serves as our full-time President and Chief Executive Officer, is not considered independent due to his employment with the Company. Robert A. Eckert will not serve as a member of the Audit Committee while he has a family member through marriage who is employed by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Board does not have a lead director.
|
Item 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm.
The audit committee is responsible for approving every engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to perform audit or non-audit services for us before being engaged to provide those services. The audit committee's pre-approval policy provides as follows:
|
•
|
First, once a year when the base audit engagement is reviewed and approved, management will identify all other services (including fee ranges) for which management knows or believes it will engage our independent registered public accounting firm for the next 12 months. Those services typically include quarterly reviews, statutory audits, specified tax matters, certifications to the lenders as required by financing documents, and consultation on new accounting and disclosure standards.
|
|
•
|
Second, if any new proposed engagement comes up during the year that was not pre-approved by the audit committee as discussed above, the engagement will require: (i) specific approval of the chief financial officer and corporate controller (including confirming with counsel permissibility under applicable laws and evaluating potential impact on independence) and, if approved by management, (ii) approval of the audit committee.
|
|
•
|
Third, the chair of the audit committee will have the authority to give such approval, but may seek full audit committee input and approval in specific cases as he or she may determine.
|
113
Auditor fees.
The following table shows fees billed to or incurred by us for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm during
2013
and
2012
:
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
November 25, 2012
|
||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||
|
Services provided:
|
|||||||
|
Audit fees
(1)
|
$
|
4,931
|
|
$
|
4,824
|
|
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Tax fees
|
703
|
|
598
|
|
|||
|
All other fees
(2)
|
1,805
|
|
90
|
|
|||
|
Total fees
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
$
|
5,512
|
|
|
_____________
|
(1)
|
Includes fees for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of interim consolidated financial statements and statutory audits.
|
|
(2)
|
Consist of fees for other permissible services other than the services reported above, primarily consulting services associated with the Company's operational planning processes.
|
114
|
Item 15.
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
List the following documents filed as a part of the report:
1. Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are included in Item 8:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
|
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on April 6, 2001.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 16, 2012.
|
|
|
4.1
|
Fiscal Agency Agreement, dated November 21, 1996, between the Registrant and Citibank, N.A., relating to ¥20 billion 4.25% bonds due 2016. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Commission on May 4, 2000.
|
|
|
4.2
|
Indenture, relating to the Euro denominated Senior Notes due 2018 and the U.S. Dollar denominated Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of May 6, 2010, between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 7, 2010.
|
|
|
4.3
|
Indenture relating to the 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of May 8, 2012, between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 11, 2012.
|
|
|
4.4
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2013, between the Registrant and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Incorporate by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Report Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013.
|
|
|
4.5
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2013, between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 15, 2013.
|
|
|
10.1
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated April 15, 1996, among LSAI Holding Corp. (predecessor of the Registrant) and the stockholders. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Commission on May 4, 2000.
|
|
115
|
10.2
|
Excess Benefit Restoration Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.3
|
Supplemental Benefit Restoration Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.4
|
First Amendment to Supplemental Benefit Restoration Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.5
|
Executive Severance Plan effective November 29, 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.6
|
Annual Incentive Plan, effective November 25, 2013. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.7
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors, Amended and Restated, effective January 1, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.8
|
First Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors, dated August 26, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.9
|
2006 Equity Incentive Plan, amended as of December 8, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.10
|
Rabbi Trust Agreement, effective January 1, 2003, between the Registrant and Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.65 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 12, 2003.*
|
|
|
10.11
|
Form of stock appreciation right award agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 19, 2006.*
|
|
|
10.12
|
Director Indemnification Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 10, 2008.
|
|
|
10.13
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated November 12, 2009, by and among the Registrant, Blue Jeans Equities West, a California general partnership, Innsbruck LP, a California limited partnership, and Plaza GB LP, a California limited partnership. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 25, 2009.
|
|
|
10.14
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Charles V. Bergh, dated June 9, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 16, 2011.*
|
|
|
10.15
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2011, by and among the Registrant, Levi Strauss & Co. (Canada) Inc., the other Loan Parties party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Multicurrency Administrative Agent, the other financial institutions, agents and arrangers party thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
10.16
|
U.S. Security Agreement, dated September 30, 2011, by the registrant and certain subsidiaries of the Registrant in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
10.17
|
Employment Offer Letter between Harmit Singh and the Registrant, dated December 10, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 13, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.18
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of May 8, 2012, between the Registrant and Charles V. Bergh. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 11, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.19
|
Employment Offer Letter between Roy Bagattini and the Registrant, dated February 20, 2013, as amended by that certain addendum by and between Mr. Bagattini and the Registrant dated December 18, 2013. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.20
|
Employment Offer Letter between Anne Rohosy and the Registrant, dated September 29, 2009. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.21
|
Employment Offer Letter between James Curleigh and the Registrant, dated May 14, 2012. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.22
|
Forms of stock appreciation rights award agreements. Filed herewith.*
|
|
116
|
12
|
Statements re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. Filed herewith.
|
|
|
14.1
|
Worldwide Code of Business Conduct of Registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.
|
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Filed herewith.
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
* Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
||
117
|
SCHEDULE II
|
|||||||||||||||
|
LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||||
|
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
Additions Charged to Expenses
|
Deductions
(1)
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
$
|
20,738
|
|
$
|
1,158
|
|
$
|
3,632
|
|
$
|
18,264
|
|
|||
|
November 25, 2012
|
$
|
22,684
|
|
$
|
5,024
|
|
$
|
6,970
|
|
$
|
20,738
|
|
|||
|
November 27, 2011
|
$
|
24,617
|
|
$
|
4,634
|
|
$
|
6,567
|
|
$
|
22,684
|
|
|||
|
Sales Returns
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
Additions Charged to Net Sales
|
Deductions
(1)
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
$
|
40,575
|
|
$
|
137,613
|
|
$
|
145,513
|
|
$
|
32,675
|
|
|||
|
November 25, 2012
|
$
|
51,023
|
|
$
|
161,620
|
|
$
|
172,068
|
|
$
|
40,575
|
|
|||
|
November 27, 2011
|
$
|
47,691
|
|
$
|
139,068
|
|
$
|
135,736
|
|
$
|
51,023
|
|
|||
|
Sales Discounts and Incentives
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
Additions Charged to Net Sales
|
Deductions
(1)
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
$
|
102,361
|
|
$
|
331,937
|
|
$
|
323,726
|
|
$
|
110,572
|
|
|||
|
November 25, 2012
|
$
|
102,359
|
|
$
|
254,556
|
|
$
|
254,554
|
|
$
|
102,361
|
|
|||
|
November 27, 2011
|
$
|
90,560
|
|
$
|
277,016
|
|
$
|
265,217
|
|
$
|
102,359
|
|
|||
|
Valuation Allowance Against Deferred Tax Assets
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
Charges/(Releases) to Tax Expense
|
(Additions) / Deductions
(1)
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
November 24, 2013
|
$
|
74,456
|
|
$
|
5,169
|
|
$
|
(16,401
|
)
|
$
|
96,026
|
|
|||
|
November 25, 2012
|
$
|
98,736
|
|
$
|
(1,329
|
)
|
$
|
22,951
|
|
$
|
74,456
|
|
|||
|
November 27, 2011
|
$
|
97,026
|
|
$
|
(2,421
|
)
|
$
|
(4,131
|
)
|
$
|
98,736
|
|
|||
_____________
|
(1)
|
The charges to the accounts are for the purposes for which the allowances were created.
|
118
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
LEVI STRAUSS & Co.
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ H
ARMIT
S
INGH
|
||
|
Harmit Singh
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
Title
|
||
|
/s/ S
TEPHEN
C. N
EAL
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Stephen C. Neal
|
|||
|
/s/ C
HARLES
V. B
ERGH
|
Director, President and
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Charles V. Bergh
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
/s/ R
OBERT
D. H
AAS
|
Director, Chairman Emeritus
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Robert D. Haas
|
|||
|
/s/ F
ERNANDO
A
GUIRRE
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Fernando Aguirre
|
|||
|
/s/ T
ROY
A
LSTEAD
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Troy Alstead
|
|||
|
/s/ J
ILL
B
ERAUD
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Jill Beraud
|
|||
|
/s/ V
ANESSA
J. C
ASTAGNA
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Vanessa J. Castagna
|
|||
|
/s/ R
OBERT
A. E
CKERT
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Robert A. Eckert
|
|||
|
/s/ S
PENCER
C. F
LEISCHER
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Spencer C. Fleischer
|
|||
|
/s/ P
ETER
E. H
AAS
JR.
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Peter E. Haas Jr.
|
|||
|
/s/ P
ATRICIA
S
ALAS
P
INEDA
|
Director
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Patricia Salas Pineda
|
|||
|
/s/ H
EIDI
L. M
ANES
|
Vice President and Controller
|
Date:
|
February 11, 2014
|
|
Heidi L. Manes
|
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
||
119
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
We will furnish our
2013
annual report and proxy statement to our stockholders after the filing of this Form 10-K and will furnish copies of such material to the SEC at such time.
120
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on April 6, 2001.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 16, 2012.
|
|
|
4.1
|
Fiscal Agency Agreement, dated November 21, 1996, between the Registrant and Citibank, N.A., relating to ¥20 billion 4.25% bonds due 2016. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Commission on May 4, 2000.
|
|
|
4.2
|
Indenture, relating to the Euro denominated Senior Notes due 2018 and the U.S. Dollar denominated Senior Notes due 2020, dated as of May 6, 2010, between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 7, 2010.
|
|
|
4.3
|
Indenture relating to the 6.875% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of May 8, 2012, between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 11, 2012.
|
|
|
4.4
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2013, between the Registrant and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Incorporate by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Report Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013.
|
|
|
4.5
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2013, between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 15, 2013.
|
|
|
10.1
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated April 15, 1996, among LSAI Holding Corp. (predecessor of the Registrant) and the stockholders. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Commission on May 4, 2000.
|
|
|
10.2
|
Excess Benefit Restoration Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.3
|
Supplemental Benefit Restoration Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.4
|
First Amendment to Supplemental Benefit Restoration Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.5
|
Executive Severance Plan effective November 29, 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.6
|
Annual Incentive Plan, effective November 25, 2013. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.7
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors, Amended and Restated, effective January 1, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.8
|
First Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Outside Directors, dated August 26, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.9
|
2006 Equity Incentive Plan, amended as of December 8, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.10
|
Rabbi Trust Agreement, effective January 1, 2003, between the Registrant and Boston Safe Deposit and Trust Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.65 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 12, 2003.*
|
|
|
10.11
|
Form of stock appreciation right award agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 19, 2006.*
|
|
|
10.12
|
Director Indemnification Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 10, 2008.
|
|
121
|
10.13
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated November 12, 2009, by and among the Registrant, Blue Jeans Equities West, a California general partnership, Innsbruck LP, a California limited partnership, and Plaza GB LP, a California limited partnership. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 25, 2009.
|
|
|
10.14
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Charles V. Bergh, dated June 9, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 16, 2011.*
|
|
|
10.15
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2011, by and among the Registrant, Levi Strauss & Co. (Canada) Inc., the other Loan Parties party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Multicurrency Administrative Agent, the other financial institutions, agents and arrangers party thereto. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
10.16
|
U.S. Security Agreement, dated September 30, 2011, by the registrant and certain subsidiaries of the Registrant in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
10.17
|
Employment Offer Letter between Harmit Singh and the Registrant, dated December 10, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 13, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.18
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of May 8, 2012, between the Registrant and Charles V. Bergh. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 11, 2012.*
|
|
|
10.19
|
Employment Offer Letter between Roy Bagattini and the Registrant, dated February 20, 2013, as amended by that certain addendum by and between Mr. Bagattini and the Registrant dated December 18, 2013. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.20
|
Employment Offer Letter between Anne Rohosy and the Registrant, dated September 29, 2009. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.21
|
Employment Offer Letter between James Curleigh and the Registrant, dated May 14, 2012. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
10.22
|
Forms of stock appreciation rights award agreements. Filed herewith.*
|
|
|
12
|
Statements re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. Filed herewith.
|
|
|
14.1
|
Worldwide Code of Business Conduct of Registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 7, 2012.
|
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Filed herewith.
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. Filed herewith.
|
|
* Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
||
122
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataNote 1: Significant Accounting PoliciesNote 2: Property, Plant and EquipmentNote 3: Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsNote 4: Fair Value Of Financial InstrumentsNote 5: Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesNote 6: DebtNote 7: GuaranteesNote 8: Employee Benefit PlansNote 9: Employee Investment PlansNote 10: Employee Incentive Compensation PlansNote 11: Stock-based Incentive Compensation PlansNote 12: Long-term Employee Related BenefitsNote 13: Commitments and ContingenciesNote 14: Dividend PaymentNote 15: Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossNote 16: Other Income (expense), NetNote 17: Income TaxesNote 18: Related PartiesNote 19: Business Segment InformationNote 20: Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors and Executive OfficersItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules