LNN 10-Q Quarter ended Feb. 28, 2014

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2014

OR

Commission File Number 1-13419

Lindsay Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

402-829-6800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x

As of March 25, 2014, 12,856,249 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation

INDEX FORM 10-Q

- 2

Table of Contents

ITEM 1 – Financial Statements

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 3

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 4

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 5

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 6

Table of Contents

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and do not include all of the disclosures normally required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) as contained in Lindsay Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected by the Company for a full year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using U.S. GAAP. These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications were not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, Amendments to Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities and in January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities . The objective of ASU No. 2011-11 and ASU No. 2013-01 is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of an entity’s financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on its financial position. Derivative instruments accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowing, and securities lending transactions are subject to ASU No. 2011-11 disclosure requirements. ASU No. 2011-11 and ASU No. 2013-01 became effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The objective of ASU No. 2013-02 is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). Entities are required to disclose changes in AOCI balances by component and significant items reclassified out of AOCI. ASU No. 2013-02 became effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Standards Issued but not yet adopted

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity . The objective of ASU No. 2013-05 is to clarify the applicable guidance for the release of the cumulative translation adjustment under U.S. GAAP. The effective date for ASU No. 2013-05 will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to impact its condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 7

Table of Contents

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013:

Certain stock options and restricted stock units are excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect is anti-dilutive. Performance stock units are excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares until the threshold performance conditions have been satisfied. Items excluded from the calculation were not significant for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

It is the Company’s policy to report income tax expense for interim periods using an estimated annual effective income tax rate. However, the tax effects of significant or unusual items are not considered in the estimated annual effective income tax rate. The tax effects of such discrete events are recognized in the interim period in which the events occur. The Company recorded no material discrete items for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.3 million and $12.9 million for the three and six months ended February 28, respectively. The Company recorded income tax expense of $10.1 million and $17.8 million for the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 35.3 percent and 34.3 percent for the year-to-date periods ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate from February 2013 to February 2014 primarily relates to incremental increases in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

Inventories consisted of the following as of February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 and August 31, 2013:

- 8

Table of Contents

The Company has no outstanding long-term debt and was in compliance with all loan covenants as of February 28, 2014. The Company’s credit arrangements consisted of the following:

Revolving Credit Agreement

The Company has an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which was amended on January 22, 2014 to revise letter of credit expiry dates and cash collateralization procedures (“the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). The borrowings from the Revolving Credit Agreement may primarily be used for working capital purposes and funding acquisitions. At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Agreement. The amount of borrowings available at any time under the Revolving Credit Agreement is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit then outstanding. At February 28, 2014, the Company had the ability to borrow $24.5 million under this facility, after consideration of standby letters of credit of $5.5 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 90 basis points (1.06 percent as of February 28, 2014), subject to adjustment as set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement. Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Agreement. Any unpaid principal and interest is due by February 13, 2016.

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains certain covenants relating to the Company’s financial condition. These include maintaining a funded debt to EBITDA ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio, a current ratio and a tangible net worth requirement at specified levels. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants, including a change in control of the Company, all amounts due thereunder may be declared to be immediately due and payable.

Euro Line of Credit

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, had an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it could borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros (the “Euro Line of Credit”). The Euro Line of Credit expired on January 31, 2014.

The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company manages market and credit risks associated with its derivative instruments by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken, and by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties. As of February 28, 2014, the Company’s derivative counterparty had investment grade credit ratings. Financial derivatives consist of the following:

Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) included realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $1.1 million, $1.8 million and $2.0 million at February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, respectively, related to derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments.

- 9

Table of Contents

For the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, which were included in OCI as part of a currency translation adjustment. For the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of $0.9 million and $1.2 million, which were included in OCI as part of a currency translation adjustment.

There were no amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations related to ineffectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts related to net investment hedges for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013. Accumulated currency translation adjustments from net investment hedges in AOCI at February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013 reflected realized and unrealized after-tax gains of $1.1 million, $1.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contracts to sell 28.9 million Euro, 29.5 million Euro and 29.2 million Euro, respectively, at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had an outstanding South African Rand foreign currency forward contract to sell 43.0 million South African Rand at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts qualify as hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, respectively.

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current portion), which represented fair value, was zero, $2.1 million and zero as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, respectively. Fair value of long-term debt (including current portion) is estimated (using level 2 inputs) by discounting the future estimated cash flows of each instrument at current market interest rates for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities and credit quality.

The Company also measures the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring basis, generally quarterly, annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These assets include fixed assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets. There were no required fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

- 10

Table of Contents

In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company is involved, from time to time, in commercial litigation, employment disputes, administrative proceedings and other legal proceedings. The Company has established accruals for certain proceedings based on an assessment of probability of loss. The Company believes that any potential loss in excess of the amounts accrued would not have a material effect on the business or its condensed consolidated financial statements. Such proceedings are exclusive of environmental remediation matters which are discussed separately below.

Environmental Remediation

In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered in 1982 through 1990 at and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”). The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989. Between 1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company. Since 1998, the primary remaining contamination at the site has been the presence of volatile organic chemicals in the soil and groundwater. To date, the remediation process has consisted primarily of drilling wells into the aquifer and pumping water to the surface to allow these contaminants to be removed by aeration.

In fiscal 2012, the Company undertook an investigation to assess further potential site remediation and containment actions. In connection with the receipt of preliminary results of this investigation and other evaluations, the Company estimated that it would incur $7.2 million in remediation of source area contamination and operating costs and accrued that undiscounted amount as an operating expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The EPA has not approved the Company’s remediation plan.

In addition to the source area noted above, the Company has determined that volatile organic chemicals also exist under one of the manufacturing buildings on the site. Due to the location, the Company has not yet determined the extent of these chemicals or whether they are contributing, if at all, to groundwater contamination. Due to the current stage of discussions with the EPA and the uncertainty of the remediation actions that may be required with respect to this affected area, the Company believes that meaningful estimates of costs or range of costs cannot currently be made and accordingly have not been accrued.

In fiscal 2013, the Company and the EPA conducted a periodic five-year review of the status of the remediation of the contamination site. This review resulted in no findings that affected the Company’s environmental liability accrual. The EPA has agreed with the Company’s plan to complete investigation of the soil and groundwater on the site, including the area under the building, during fiscal 2014 and early 2015. The Company expects that once this additional testing is complete, it will come to an agreement with the EPA on how to proceed. During the first six months of fiscal 2014, the Company did not accrue any additional incremental costs related to environmental remediation liabilities.

The Company accrues the anticipated cost of investigation and remediation when the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Although the Company has accrued all reasonably estimable costs associated with the site, it anticipates there could be revisions to the current remediation plan as well as additional testing and environmental monitoring as part of the Company’s ongoing discussions with the EPA regarding the development and implementation of the remedial action plans. Any revisions could be material to the operating results of any fiscal quarter or fiscal year. The Company does not expect such additional expenses would have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial condition.

The following table summarizes the undiscounted environmental remediation liability classifications included in the balance sheet as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013:

- 11

Table of Contents

The following table provides the changes in the Company’s product warranties:

The Company’s current share-based compensation plans, approved by the stockholders of the Company, provides for awards of stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance stock units (“PSUs”) to employees and non-employee directors of the Company. The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. Share-based compensation expense was $1.0 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Share-based compensation expense was $2.2 million and $2.4 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company awarded its annual grant of RSUs to independent members of the Board of Directors at a grant date fair value of $83.17 per share, which resulted in a total of 5,831 RSUs being granted. These RSUs are scheduled to become fully vested on November 1, 2014 and were issued from the Company’s 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Irrigation— This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems as well as various water pumping stations, controls, and filtration solutions. The irrigation reporting segment consists of thirteen operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.

Infrastructure— This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of Road Zipper Systems ^TM , moveable barriers, specialty barriers and crash cushions; providing outsource manufacturing services and the manufacturing and selling of large diameter steel tubing and railroad signals and structures. The infrastructure reporting segment consists of two operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.

The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on segment sales, gross profit, and operating income, with operating income for segment purposes excluding unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses, interest income, interest expense, other income and expenses, and income taxes. Operating income for segment purposes does include general and administrative expenses, selling expenses, engineering and research expenses, environmental remediation expenses and other overhead charges directly attributable to the segment.

The Company had no single major customer who represented 10 percent or more of its total revenues during the three and six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013.

- 12

Table of Contents

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following tables:

On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors replaced its existing share repurchase authorization with an increased authorization to repurchase up to $150.0 million of common stock with an authorization effective through January 2, 2016. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2014, the Company repurchased 78,520 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $6.6 million. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, the Company did not repurchase shares of common stock. The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $143.4 million as of February 28, 2014.

- 13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations for future Company conditions or performance. In addition, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on the Company’s worldwide web site, or otherwise, in the future by or on behalf of the Company. When used by or on behalf of the Company, the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “will,” “plan,” “project,” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The entire section entitled “Market Conditions and Outlook” should be considered forward-looking statements. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2013. Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results or conditions, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results or conditions could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013, as well as other risks and uncertainties not now anticipated. The risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company and its businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company’s financial results, may emerge from time to time. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

Accounting Policies

In preparing the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s historical experience.

The Company’s accounting policies that are most important to the presentation of its results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as its critical accounting policies. See discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013. Management periodically re-evaluates and adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change. There were no changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies during the three and six months ended February 28, 2014.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

- 14

Table of Contents

Executive Overview

Net earnings for the three months ended February 28, 2014 were $13.5 million or $1.04 per diluted share compared with $19.4 million or $1.50 per diluted share in the prior year. The decrease in earnings was primarily attributable to a 13 percent decline in operating revenues to $152.8 million from $175.5 million in the prior year period. Gross margin declined to 27.9 percent of sales from 28.7 percent in the prior year due to a shift in sales mix and deleverage of fixed costs on lower sales. In addition, operating expenses increased by $0.8 million, including an incremental $2.2 million of expenses associated with the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business. Excluding the LAKOS ^® acquisition, operating expenses declined $1.4 million.

The primary driver to consolidated results in the quarter was the irrigation segment, where sales decreased by 16 percent to $135.9 million from $162.7 million in the prior year and operating margins declined to 18.1 percent of sales from 21.7 percent last year. The lower sales were primarily attributable to a $23.4 million sales decline in U.S. irrigation markets as a result of lower crop prices and a decreasing impact of drought conditions in the U.S. Corn Belt, while the lower operating margins are due to the deleveraging of fixed expenses on lower revenue.

Infrastructure segment results improved in the quarter as revenues increased 32 percent to $16.9 million and operating profit improved to break-even as compared to an operating loss of $2.1 million in the prior year. Sales and profit improvements are due to a more aggressive approach to sales growth in the infrastructure product lines while improving gross margins and reducing SG&A expenses.

During the second quarter, the Company began to execute the capital allocation plan that it had announced in January 2014, doubling its quarterly cash dividend to $0.26 per common share and repurchasing 78,520 shares of common stock for $6.6 million.

Market Conditions and Outlook

The Company’s irrigation revenues are highly dependent upon the need for irrigated agricultural crop production, which, in turn, depends upon many factors, including the primary drivers of agricultural commodity prices, net farm income, weather conditions and governmental policies regarding the agricultural sector. The degree to which each of these factors impact the irrigation equipment purchase decisions of the Company’s customers is difficult to predict.

Farm commodity prices have declined during the past year on indications of strong yields and a decreasing impact of drought conditions in the U.S. Corn Belt. As of February 2014, corn prices have decreased 35 percent and soybeans have decreased 3 percent compared to the same time last year. As of February 2014, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimated U.S. 2014 net farm income to be $95.8 billion, down 27 percent from USDA’s estimate of U.S. 2013 net farm income of $130.5 billion. The U.S. 2014 net farm income forecast would be the lowest since 2010, but would remain 9% above the 10-year average.

A number of recent and potential regulatory actions could further impact the Company’s business.

At this point, the Company anticipates lower irrigation segment revenues for the remainder of fiscal 2014 primarily due to the significant decrease in agricultural commodity prices. The U.S. irrigation market has slowed significantly as compared to the past several years of record crop prices and the significant drought. The potential for an increase in international irrigation revenues will be challenging for the remainder of fiscal 2014 since prior year irrigation revenues included $33.4 million from the equipment purchases in Iraq. The current political environment regarding Russia and Ukraine may further limit international irrigation equipment growth.

- 15

Table of Contents

While the Company anticipates a decline from peak irrigation revenues during the near-term, drivers for the Company’s markets of population growth, expanded food production and efficient water use, support the Company’s expectation for long-term growth. The Company believes the most significant opportunities for growth over the next several years are in international markets, where irrigation use is significantly less developed and demand is driven primarily by food security, water scarcity and population growth. The Company’s capital expenditure plan includes investments in a manufacturing operation in Turkey, which is planned to be operational early in fiscal 2015 and should accommodate long-term growth plans for several international markets.

Infrastructure demand has increased in recent quarters as the Company has aggressively pursued market expansion. However, the infrastructure business remains dependent on government spending on highway and other infrastructure projects. In addition, the current U.S. highway bill is scheduled to expire in the fall of 2014. While the infrastructure segment continues to experience revenue and profit volatility due to the project nature of the Road Zipper Systems ^TM and the fixed nature of some operating expenses, the Company believes it has sizeable market penetration opportunities for road safety products and Road Zipper Systems ^TM worldwide. Demand for the Company’s transportation safety products continues to be driven by population growth and the need for improved road safety.

As of February 28, 2014, the Company had an order backlog of $89.3 million compared with $159.3 million at February 28, 2013 and $66.5 million at August 31, 2013. Order backlog at February 28, 2014 declined from the same time in 2013 in U.S. and international irrigation markets, and infrastructure segment backlog increased over the same time last year. The current year infrastructure backlog includes a $12.8 million Road Zipper System ^TM order for the Golden Gate Bridge which will be recognized in revenue in fiscal 2015. The prior year irrigation backlog included a $39.1 million equipment and installation contract in Iraq, of which $3.0 million remained in backlog at February 28, 2014. The Company’s backlog can fluctuate from period to period due to the seasonality, cyclicality, timing and execution of contracts. Typically, the Company’s backlog at any point in time represents only a portion of the revenue it expects to realize during the following three-month period. However, the timing related to certain project oriented contracts may extend longer than three months.

For the business overall, the global, long-term drivers of water conservation, population growth, increasing importance of biofuels, and the need for safer, more efficient transportation solutions remain positive. The Company is committed to increasing shareholder value through investments in organic growth, dividend increases, synergistic water related acquisitions, and share repurchases, as outlined in the Company’s capital allocation plan announced in January 2014.

- 16

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

For the Three Months ended February 28, 2014 compared to the Three Months ended February 28, 2013

The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:

- 17

Table of Contents

Revenues

Operating revenues for the three months ended February 28, 2014 declined 13 percent to $152.8 million from $175.5 million for the three months ended February 28, 2013 as irrigation revenues decreased $26.8 million partially offset by the $4.1 million increase of infrastructure revenues. The irrigation segment provided 89 percent of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended February 28, 2014 as compared to 93 percent of the same prior year period.

U.S. irrigation revenues for the three months ended February 28, 2014 of $92.8 million decreased 21 percent compared to the three months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in U.S. irrigation revenues is primarily due to a 35 percent decrease in the number of irrigation systems sold and a 10 percent decrease in irrigation parts volume compared to the second fiscal quarter of the prior year, with the largest decreases in the Corn Belt where the drought conditions in 2012 led to high demand in fiscal 2013. Lower commodity prices, with corn decreasing 35 percent and soybeans decreasing 3 percent over the same period last year, contributed to lower demand for U.S. irrigation equipment. The revenues generated from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 partially offset the volume decreases in irrigation systems and parts.

International irrigation revenues for the three months ended February 28, 2014 of $43.1 million decreased 5 percent from $45.5 million in the three months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in international irrigation revenues is primarily due to volume decreases in the number of irrigation systems sold compared to the prior year. Operating revenues decreased most significantly in the Middle East and Russia/Ukraine partially offset by increases in Australia, Africa, and water filtration system sales from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business.

Infrastructure segment revenues were $16.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 increasing 32 percent from $12.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2013 primarily due to sales increases across all product lines and most significantly in road safety products and railroad signals and structures.

Gross Margin

Gross profit for the three months ended February 28, 2014 of $42.7 million decreased from $50.4 million for three months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to the decline in sales and a decrease in gross margin to 27.9 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2014 from 28.7 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2013. Gross margins in irrigation declined by approximately one percentage point due to fixed cost deleverage on lower sales and a higher percentage of sales being made in international markets that typically have lower margins than U.S. sales. Infrastructure gross margins improved by approximately seven percentage points primarily due to a combination of mix shift to higher margin products and fixed cost leverage on higher sales volume.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s operating expenses of $21.8 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 increased by $0.8 million over operating expenses incurred during the three months ended February 28, 2013. The newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 increased operating expenses by $2.2 million. Excluding the LAKOS ^® acquisition, operating expenses declined $1.4 million primarily due to reductions of $0.9 million in incentive compensation and $0.5 million in advertising expenses. Operating expenses were 14.2 percent of sales for the three months ended February 28, 2014 compared to 11.9 percent of sales for the three months ended February 28, 2013.

The combination of lower gross margins and higher operating expenses resulted in a reduction in operating margin for the three months ended February 28, 2014 to 13.7 percent as compared to 16.8 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2013.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.3 million and $10.1 million for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 35.3 percent and 34.4 percent for the three months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate primarily relates to an incremental increase in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

- 18

Table of Contents

For the Six Months ended February 28, 2014 compared to the Six Months ended February 28, 2013

The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:

- 19

Table of Contents

Revenues

Operating revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 decreased 7 percent to $300.5 million from $322.9 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease is attributable to a $31.8 million decrease in irrigation revenues offset in part by a $9.4 million increase in infrastructure revenues. The irrigation segment provided 88 percent of Company revenue for the six months ended February 28, 2014 as compared to 92 percent of the same prior year period.

U.S. irrigation revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $172.6 million decreased 19 percent compared to the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in U.S. irrigation revenues is primarily due to a 33 percent decrease in the number of irrigation systems sold and an 11 percent decrease in irrigation parts volume compared to the first half of the prior year, with the largest decreases in the Corn Belt where the drought conditions in 2012 led to high demand in fiscal 2013. Lower agricultural commodity prices contributed to lower demand for U.S. irrigation equipment. The revenues generated from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 partially offset the volume decreases in irrigation systems and parts.

International irrigation revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $92.4 million increased 11 percent from $83.3 million in the six months ended February 28, 2013. The increase in international irrigation revenues is primarily due to volume increases in the number of irrigation systems sold and water filtration system sales from the newly acquired LAKOS ^® business. Operating revenues increased most significantly in Australia and South America partially offset by decreases in the Middle East.

Infrastructure segment revenues were $35.4 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 increasing 36 percent from $26.0 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013 primarily due to sales increases in nearly all product lines and most significantly in road safety products and railroad signals and structures.

Gross Margin

Gross profit for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $82.8 million decreased from $93.2 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to the decline in sales and a decrease in gross margin to 27.6 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared from 28.9 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2013. Gross margins in irrigation declined by approximately two percentage points due to a $2.3 million charge related to a product warranty matter, fixed cost deleverage on lower volume, and a higher percentage of irrigation sales being made in international markets that typically have lower margins than U.S. sales. Infrastructure gross margins improved by approximately six percentage points primarily due to a combination of mix shift to higher margin products and fixed cost leverage on higher sales volume.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s operating expenses of $45.9 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 increased by $4.4 million over operating expenses incurred during the six months ended February 28, 2013. The newly acquired LAKOS ^® business in August 2013 increased operating expenses by $4.3 million. Operating expenses were 15.3 percent of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to 12.9 percent of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2013.

The combination of lower gross margins and higher operating expenses resulted in a reduction in operating margin for the six months ended February 28, 2014 to 12.3 percent as compared to 16.0 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2013.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $12.9 million and $17.8 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 35.3 percent and 34.3 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate from February 2013 to February 2014 primarily relates to an incremental increase in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

- 20

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $165.5 million at February 28, 2014 compared with $159.6 million at February 28, 2013 and $151.9 million at August 31, 2013. The Company requires cash for financing its receivables and inventories, paying operating expenses and capital expenditures, and for dividends and share repurchases. The Company meets its liquidity needs and finances its capital expenditures from its available cash and funds provided by operations along with borrowings under its revolving credit arrangement described below. The Company believes its current cash resources, projected operating cash flow, and remaining capacity under its continuing bank lines of credit are sufficient to cover all of its expected working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, dividends, and other cash requirements, excluding potential acquisitions.

The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries was approximately $28.6 million and $13.4 million as of February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company does not intend to repatriate the funds, and does not expect these funds to have a significant impact on the Company’s overall liquidity. The Company considers its earnings in foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested and would need to accrue and pay taxes if these funds were repatriated.

Net working capital was $281.7 million at February 28, 2014, as compared with $255.7 million at February 28, 2013. The increase in net working capital primarily resulted from increased cash generated by earnings and receivables driven by the timing of collections on large international sales projects.

Cash flows provided by operations totaled $32.4 million during the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to $26.2 million provided by operations during the same prior year period. Cash provided by operations decreased by $6.3 million compared to the prior year period primarily as a result of decreased earnings ($10.4 million) and negative cash flow changes in payables ($20.6 million) offset in part by increases due to positive cash flow changes in receivables ($31.9 million) and inventories ($12.6 million).

Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $6.9 million during the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to $7.2 million used in investing activities during the same prior year period. Capital spending of $5.4 million in fiscal 2014 increased compared to the prior year capital spending of $5.3 million. The capital spending increase was offset by $0.4 million increase from net settlements of net investment hedges.

Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $12.6 million during the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $3.3 million during the same prior year period. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily related to share repurchases of $6.6 million and dividend increases of $2.1 million. The Company’s total interest-bearing debt decreased from $2.3 million at February 28, 2013 to none at February 28, 2014.

Capital Allocation Plan

The Company’s capital allocation plan articulates the Company’s plans to continue to invest in attaining revenue and earnings growth, combined with a defined process for enhancing returns to shareholders. Under the Company’s announced capital allocation plan in January 2014, the priorities for uses of cash include:

Capital Expenditures and Expansion of International Markets

Capital expenditures for fiscal 2014 are estimated to be approximately $15.0 million to $20.0 million largely focused on manufacturing capacity expansion and productivity improvements. The Company’s capital expenditure plan includes investments in a manufacturing operation in Turkey, which is planned to be operational early in fiscal 2015 and should accommodate long-term growth plans for several international markets. The Company’s management does maintain flexibility to modify the amount and timing of some of the planned expenditures in response to economic conditions.

Dividends

In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company doubled its quarterly cash dividend to $0.26 per common share. The Company expects to continue paying quarterly dividends and provide annual dividend increases to shareholders, subject to declaration by the Board of Directors.

- 21

Table of Contents

Share Repurchases

On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors terminated its existing share repurchase authorization to purchase up to a maximum of 881,139 shares of its common stock, effective as of January 2, 2014, and replaced it with an increased authorization to repurchase up to $150.0 million of common stock through January 2, 2016. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2014, the Company repurchased 78,520 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $6.6 million. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, the Company did not repurchase shares of common stock. The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $143.4 million as of February 28, 2014.

Credit Arrangements

The Company has an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which was amended on January 22, 2014 to revise letter of credit expiry dates and cash collateralization procedures (“the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). The borrowings from the Revolving Credit Agreement may primarily be used for working capital purposes and funding acquisitions. At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Agreement. The amount of borrowings available at any time under the Revolving Credit Agreement is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit then outstanding. At February 28, 2014, the Company had the ability to borrow $24.5 million under this facility, after consideration of standby letters of credit of $5.5 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 90 basis points (1.06 percent as of February 28, 2014), subject to adjustment as set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement. Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Agreement. Any unpaid principal and interest is due by February 13, 2016.

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains certain covenants relating to the Company’s financial condition. These include maintaining a funded debt to EBITDA ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio, a current ratio and a tangible net worth requirement at specified levels. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants, including a change in control of the Company, all amounts due thereunder may be declared to be immediately due and payable. At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all loan covenants.

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, had an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it could borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros. This line of credit expired on January 31, 2014. The Company intends to put a new credit arrangement in place during the second half of fiscal 2014.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

There have been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes from the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. See discussion of the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk under Part II, Item 7A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 28, 2014.

Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there has not been any change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 22

Table of Contents

ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings

See the disclosure in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which disclosure is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A – Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. See the discussion of the Company’s risk factors under Part I, Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table below sets forth information with respect to purchases of the Company’s common stock made by or on behalf of the Company during the three months ended February 28, 2014:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

- 23

Table of Contents

ITEM 6 – Exhibits