LYB 10-Q Quarterly Report March 31, 2012 | Alphaminr
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.

LYB 10-Q Quarter ended March 31, 2012

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 d341663d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to

Commission file number: 001-34726

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

The Netherlands 98-0646235

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Stationsplein 45

3013 AK Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)

31 10 275 5500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No ¨

The registrant had 574,623,896 ordinary shares, €0.04 par value, outstanding at April 27, 2012 (excluding 3,678,709 treasury shares).


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Part I – Financial Information

1

Item 1. Financial Statements

1

Consolidated Statements of Income

1

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

2

Consolidated Balance Sheets

3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

5

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

6

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

7

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

37

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

53

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

53

Part II – Other Information

54

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

54

Item 1A. Risk Factors

54

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

54

Item 6. Exhibits

55

Signature

56


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars, except earnings per share

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues:

Trade

$ 11,592 $ 11,960

Related parties

287 292

11,879 12,252

Operating costs and expenses:

Cost of sales

10,670 10,943

Selling, general and administrative expenses

224 211

Research and development expenses

39 33

10,933 11,187

Operating income

946 1,065

Interest expense

(99 ) (163 )

Interest income

4 8

Other expense, net

(1 ) (43 )

Income before equity investments, reorganization items and income taxes

850 867

Income from equity investments

46 58

Reorganization items

5 (2 )

Income before income taxes

901 923

Provision for income taxes

302 263

Net income

599 660

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

1 3

Net income attributable to the Company

$ 600 $ 663

Earnings per share:

Net income—

Basic

$ 1.04 $ 1.16

Diluted

$ 1.04 $ 1.15

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

1


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Three months ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Net income

$ 599 $ 660

Other comprehensive income, net of tax –

Defined benefit pension plan:

Prior service cost arising during period

1 2

Amortization of prior service cost included in net income

6

Income taxes on defined benefit plans

(2 )

Defined benefit pension plan, net

5 2

Foreign currency translations adjustment:

Unrealized net change arising during the period

203 376

Income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments

1 1

Foreign currency translations, net of tax

204 377

Total other comprehensive income

209 379

Comprehensive income

808 1,039

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest

1 3

Comprehensive income attributable to the Company

$ 809 $ 1,042

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Millions, except shares and par value data

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011

ASSETS

Current Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 1,670 $ 1,065

Restricted cash

9 53

Accounts receivable:

Trade, net

3,973 3,582

Related parties

236 196

Inventories

5,208 5,499

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,002 1,040

Total current assets

12,098 11,435

Property, plant and equipment, net

7,426 7,333

Investments and long-term receivables:

Investment in PO joint ventures

415 412

Equity investments

1,605 1,559

Related party receivables

4 4

Other investments and long-term receivables

72 68

Goodwill

595 585

Intangible assets, net

1,149 1,177

Other assets

245 266

Total assets

$ 23,609 $ 22,839

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Millions, except shares and par value data

March 31,
2012
December 31,
2011

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Current maturities of long-term debt

$ $ 4

Short-term debt

42 48

Accounts payable:

Trade

2,638 2,562

Related parties

907 852

Accrued liabilities

1,049 1,242

Deferred income taxes

310 310

Total current liabilities

4,946 5,018

Long-term debt

3,984 3,980

Other liabilities

2,281 2,277

Deferred income taxes

1,035 917

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:

Ordinary shares, €0.04 par value, 1,275 million shares authorized, 574,467,256 and 573,390,514 shares outstanding, respectively

31 31

Additional paid-in capital

10,319 10,272

Retained earnings

1,298 841

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(218 ) (427 )

Treasury stock, at cost, 3,835,350 and 4,051,013 ordinary shares, respectively

(120 ) (124 )

Total Company share of stockholders’ equity

11,310 10,593

Non-controlling interests

53 54

Total equity

11,363 10,647

Total liabilities and equity

$ 23,609 $ 22,839

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$ 599 $ 660

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

Depreciation and amortization

237 215

Asset impairments

22 5

Amortization of debt-related costs

6 8

Equity investments—

Equity income

(46 ) (58 )

Distribution of earnings, net of tax

14 96

Deferred income taxes

153 81

Reorganization items

(5 ) 2

Gain on sale of assets

(4 )

Unrealized foreign currency exchange loss

10 3

Changes in assets and liabilities that provided (used) cash:

Accounts receivable

(374 ) (897 )

Inventories

346 (799 )

Accounts payable

80 1,264

Contributions to pension plans

(10 ) (155 )

Income tax refunds

244 2

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

(274 ) (86 )

Other, net

(77 ) (120 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

921 221

Cash flows from investing activities:

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment

(228 ) (221 )

Proceeds from disposal of assets

4 5

Restricted cash

44

Other

(5 )

Net cash used in investing activities

(185 ) (216 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Shares issued upon exercise of warrants

1 37

Dividends paid

(143 )

Proceeds from short-term debt

10

Repayments of short-term debt

(19 )

Repayments of long-term debt

(2 )

Other, net

5 (9 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(148 ) 28

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

17 128

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

605 161

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,065 4,222

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 1,670 $ 4,383

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other

Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Non-
Controlling
Interests
Ordinary Shares

Millions of dollars

Issued Treasury

Balance, January 1, 2012

$ 31 $ (124 ) $ 10,272 $ 841 $ (427 ) $ 10,593 $ 54

Net income (loss)

600 600 (1 )

Other comprehensive income

209 209

Warrants exercised

37 37

Shares purchased

(11 ) (11 )

Share-based compensation

15 10 25

Cash dividends ($0.25 per share)

(143 ) (143 )

Balance, March 31, 2012

$ 31 $ (120 ) $ 10,319 $ 1,298 $ (218 ) $ 11,310 $ 53

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

6


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. Basis of Presentation

8

2. Accounting and Reporting Changes

8

3. Accounts Receivable

9

4. Inventories

9

5. Property, Plant and Equipment, Goodwill, Intangibles and Other Assets

10

6. Investment in PO Joint Ventures

11

7. Equity Investments

11

8. Debt

12

9. Financial Instruments

13

10. Fair Value Measurement

18

11. Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits

22

12. Income Taxes

22

13. Commitments and Contingencies

23

14. Stockholders’ Equity and Non-Controlling Interests

25

15. Per Share Data

26

16. Segment and Related Information

28

17. Subsequent Events

30

18. Supplemental Guarantor Information

30

7


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

1. Basis of Presentation

LyondellBasell Industries N.V., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively “LyondellBasell N.V.”), is a worldwide manufacturer of chemicals and polymers, a refiner of crude oil, a significant producer of gasoline blending components and a developer and licensor of technologies for production of polymers and other chemicals. When we use the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar words, unless the context otherwise requires, we are referring to LyondellBasell N.V.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared from the books and records of LyondellBasell N.V. in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-1 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the LyondellBasell N.V. consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the LyondellBasell Industries N.V. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

2. Accounting and Reporting Changes

Recently Adopted Guidance

Comprehensive Income —In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, related to ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income . This standard eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Under ASC 220, an entity can elect to present either i) one continuous statement of comprehensive income or ii) in two separate but consecutive statements. Under the two-statement approach, the first statement would include components of net income, which is consistent with the income statement format used before, and the second statement would include components of other comprehensive income (OCI). The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in OCI. We have included the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in this interim report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Fair Value Measurement —In May, 2011 the FASB issued new guidance related to ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs . The new guidance results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and changes some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. This guidance aligns the fair value measurement of instruments classified within an entity’s shareholders’ equity with the guidance for liabilities. As a result, entities are required to measure the fair value of their own equity instruments from the perspective of a market participant that holds the equity instruments as assets. This guidance also enhances disclosure requirements for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements to include quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements. New disclosures on the use of a nonfinancial asset

8


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

measured or disclosed at fair value are required if its use differs from its highest and best use. In addition, entities must report the level in the fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value but where fair value is disclosed. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment in 2012 did not have a material effect on the presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Guidance Issued But Not Adopted as of March 31, 2012

Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities —On December 16, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities . The standard requires disclosures to provide information to help reconcile differences in the offsetting requirements under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The differences in the offsetting requirements account for a significant difference in the amounts presented in statements of financial position prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position (balance sheet), as well as instruments similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the presentation of our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

3. Accounts Receivable

Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, which is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a reduction of accounts receivable, totaled $20 million and $16 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

4. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following components:

March 31, December 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Finished goods

$ 3,306 $ 3,544

Work-in-process

271 267

Raw materials and supplies

1,631 1,688

Total inventories

$ 5,208 $ 5,499

9


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5. Property, Plant and Equipment, Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The components of property, plant and equipment, at cost, and the related accumulated depreciation were as follows:

March 31, December 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Land

$ 306 $ 301

Manufacturing facilities and equipment

7,624 7,358

Construction in progress

827 785

Total property, plant and equipment

8,757 8,444

Less accumulated depreciation

(1,331 ) (1,111 )

Property, plant and equipment, net

$ 7,426 $ 7,333

During the first quarter of 2012, we recognized impairments totaling $22 million, primarily related to damage to our LDPE plant in Wesseling, Germany resulting from an explosion in a reactor bay.

On January 4, 2012 we ceased operations at our Berre refinery. No impairment charge was taken during the period as the refinery was fully impaired in 2008 and all subsequent capital expenditures were impaired in the period in which they were incurred.

Depreciation and amortization expense is summarized as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Property, plant and equipment

$ 194 $ 167

Investment in PO joint ventures

7 7

Emission allowances

17 18

Various contracts

10 22

Technology, patent and license costs

5

Software costs

4 1

Total depreciation and amortization

$ 237 $ 215

Asset Retirement Obligations —The liabilities recognized for all asset retirement obligations were $120 million and $123 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Goodwill —Goodwill increased from $585 million at December 31, 2011 to $595 million at March 31, 2012. The $10 million change in goodwill is a result of foreign exchange translation.

10


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

6. Investment in PO Joint Ventures

Changes in our investment in the U.S. and European PO joint ventures for 2012 and 2011 are summarized below:

U.S. PO Joint European PO Total PO

Millions of dollars

Venture Joint Venture Joint Ventures

Investments in PO joint ventures—January 1, 2012

$ 274 $ 138 $ 412

Cash contributions

1 5 6

Depreciation and amortization

(5 ) (2 ) (7 )

Effect of exchange rate changes

4 4

Investments in PO joint ventures—March 31, 2012

$ 270 $ 145 $ 415

Investments in PO joint ventures—January 1, 2011

$ 291 $ 146 $ 437

Cash contributions

5 5

Depreciation and amortization

(5 ) (2 ) (7 )

Effect of exchange rate changes

9 9

Investments in PO joint ventures—March 31, 2011

$ 286 $ 158 $ 444

7. Equity Investments

The changes in equity investments were as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Beginning balance

$ 1,559 $ 1,587

Income from equity investments

46 58

Dividends received, gross

(14 ) (103 )

Currency exchange effects

18 44

Other

(4 )

Ending balance

$ 1,605 $ 1,586

11


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Summarized income statement information and our share for the periods for which the respective Equity investments were accounted for under the equity method is set forth below:

Three months ended
March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011
Company Company

Millions of dollars

100% Share 100% Share

Revenues

$ 2,457 $ 908 $ 3,587 $ 1,239

Cost of sales

(2,189 ) (821 ) (3,170 ) (1,109 )

Gross profit

268 87 417 130

Net operating expenses

(74 ) (21 ) (98 ) (32 )

Operating income

194 66 319 98

Interest expense

(57 ) (16 ) (58 ) (16 )

Foreign currency translation

5 4 (39 ) (10 )

Income from equity investments

7 2 10 3

Income before income taxes

149 56 232 75

Provision for income taxes

34 10 53 17

Net income

$ 115 $ 46 $ 179 $ 58

8. Debt

Long-term loans, notes and other long-term debt due to banks and other unrelated parties consisted of the following:

March 31, December 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Senior Notes due 2017, $2,250 million, 8.0%

$ 619 $ 619

Senior Notes due 2017, € 375 million, 8.0%

138 134

Senior Notes due 2018, $3,240 million, 11.0%

1,922 1,922

Senior Notes due 2021, $1,000 million, 6.0%

1,000 1,000

Guaranteed Notes, due 2027, $300 million, 8.1%

300 300

Other

5 9

Total

3,984 3,984

Less current maturities

(4 )

Long-term debt

$ 3,984 $ 3,980

12


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Short-term loans, notes and other short-term debt due to banks and other unrelated parties consisted of the following:

March 31, December 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

$2,000 million Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility

$ $

€450 million European Receivables Securitization Facility

Financial payables to equity investees

10 10

Other

32 38

Total short-term debt

$ 42 $ 48

On April 9, 2012, LyondellBasell N.V. issued $2,000 million aggregate principal amount of 5% senior notes due 2019 and $1,000 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% senior notes due 2024, each at an issue price of 100%. These notes were issued in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers and to certain non-U.S. persons in offshore transactions.

Pursuant to a cash tender offer, in April 2012 we repaid $2,606 million of debt, comprising $742 million, or approximately 98%, of our 8% senior notes outstanding and $1,864 million, or 97%, of our 11% senior notes outstanding. In connection with the tender offer, we paid premiums totaling $287 million. We also obtained consents from the note holders to eliminate substantially all of the covenants in the indentures governing the 8% and 11% notes.

Amortization of debt issuance costs in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 resulted in amortization expense of $6 million and $8 million, respectively, which is included in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

At March 31, 2012 and 2011, our weighted average interest rates on outstanding short-term debt were 2.9% and 3.8%, respectively.

9. Financial Instruments

Cash Concentration —Our cash equivalents are placed in high-quality commercial paper, money market funds and time deposits with major international banks and financial institutions.

Market Risks —We are exposed to market risks, such as changes in commodity pricing, currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage the volatility related to these exposures, we selectively enter into derivative transactions pursuant to our policies. Designation of the derivatives as fair-value or cash-flow hedges is performed on a specific exposure basis. Hedge accounting may or may not be elected with respect to certain short-term exposures. The changes in fair value of these hedging instruments are offset in part or in whole by corresponding changes in the fair value or cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged.

13


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Commodity Prices —We are exposed to commodity price volatility related to anticipated purchases of natural gas, crude oil and other raw materials and sales of our products. We selectively use commodity swap, option, and futures contracts with various terms to manage the volatility related to these risks. Such contracts are generally limited to durations of one year or less. Cash-flow hedge accounting may be elected for these derivative transactions. In cases, when the duration of a derivative is short, hedge accounting generally would not be elected. When hedge accounting is not elected, the changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in earnings. When hedge accounting is elected, gains and losses on these instruments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), to the extent that the hedge remains effective, until the underlying transaction is recognized in earnings.

The following table summarizes the pretax effect of settled commodity futures contracts charged directly to income:

Settled Commodity Contracts
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Millions of dollars

Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
Volumes
Settled
Volume Unit

Futures:

Gasoline

$ 12 55 million gallons

Heating oil

4 112 million gallons

Butane

(1 ) 12 million gallons

Crude oil

(6 ) 80 million gallons

$ 9

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
Volumes
Settled
Volume Unit

Futures:

Gasoline

$ 1 119 million gallons

Heating oil

5 157 million gallons

$ 6

14


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The estimated fair value and notional amounts of our open commodity futures contracts are shown in the table below:

Open Commodity Contracts
March 31, 2012
Notional Amounts

Millions of dollars

Fair Value Value Volumes Volume Unit Maturity Dates

Futures:

Gasoline

$ $ 85 28 million gallons

April 2012 and
October 2012 -
February 2013


Heating oil

37 12 million gallons April 2012

Butane

38 20 million gallons
October 2012 -
February 2013

$ $ 160

December 31, 2011
Notional Amounts
Fair Value Value Volumes Volume Unit Maturity Dates

Futures:

Gasoline

$ 12 $ 34 12 million gallons
January 2012 -
February 2012

Heating oil

1 54 19 million gallons January 2012

Butane

(1 ) 22 12 million gallons
January 2012 -
February 2012

$ 12 $ 110

Foreign Currency Rates —We have significant operations in several countries of which functional currencies are primarily the U.S. dollar for U.S. operations and the Euro for operations in Europe. We enter into transactions denominated in other than our functional currency and the functional currencies of our subsidiaries. As a result, we are exposed to foreign currency risk on receivables and payables. We maintain risk management control policies intended to monitor foreign currency risk attributable to both the outstanding foreign currency balances and future commitments. The risk management control policies involve the centralization of foreign currency exposure management, the offsetting of exposures and the estimating of expected impacts of changes in foreign currency rates on our earnings. We enter into foreign currency spot, forward and swap contracts to reduce the effects of our net currency exchange exposures. At March 31, 2012, foreign currency spot, forward and swap contracts in the notional amount of $692 million, maturing in April and May 2012, were outstanding. The fair values, based on quoted market exchange rates, resulted in a net receivable of $3 million at March 31, 2012 and a net payable of $12 million at December 31, 2011.

For forward contracts that economically hedge recognized monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, no hedge accounting is applied. Changes in the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and offset the currency exchange results recognized on the assets and liabilities.

Foreign Currency Gain (Loss) —Other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income reflected gains of $2 million and $10 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

15


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Warrants —As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had warrants outstanding to purchase 139,145 and 1,000,223 ordinary shares at an exercise price of $13.77 per ordinary share, respectively. The warrants have anti-dilution protection for in-kind stock dividends, stock splits, stock combinations and similar transactions and may be exercised at any time until the close of business on April 30, 2017. Upon an affiliate change of control, the holders of the warrants may put the warrants to LyondellBasell N.V. at a price equal to, as applicable, the in-the-money value of the warrants or the Black-Scholes value of the warrants.

We calculated the fair value of our warrants using the weighted average price of our stock for the last 20 trading days less the warrant exercise price. Accordingly, the warrants are classified as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy.

The fair values of the warrants were determined to be $4 million and $19 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Derivatives —The following table summarizes financial instruments outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

March 31, 2012 December 31, 2011

Millions of dollars

Balance Sheet
Classification

Notional
Amount
Fair
Value
Notional
Amount
Fair
Value

March 31, 2012:

Assets at fair value –

Derivatives:

Commodities

Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 95 $ $ 88 $ 13

Foreign currency

Prepaid expenses and other current assets 692 3

$ 787 $ 3 $ 88 $ 13

Liabilities at fair value –

Derivatives:

Commodities

Accrued liabilities $ 65 $ $ 22 $ 1

Warrants

Accrued liabilities 2 4 14 19

Foreign currency

Accrued liabilities $ 726 12

$ 67 $ 4 $ 762 $ 32

16


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes the pretax effect of derivative instruments charged directly to income:

Effect of Financial Instruments
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Millions of dollars

Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in AOCI
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
to Income
Additional
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
Income Statement
Classification

Derivatives not designated as hedges:

Warrants

$ $ $ (10 ) Other income
(expense), net

Commodities

9 Cost of sales

Foreign currency

23 Other income
(expense), net

$ $ $ 22

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Millions of dollars

Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in AOCI
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
to Income
Additional
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Income
Income Statement
Classification

Derivatives not designated as hedges:

Warrants

$ $ $ (59 ) Other income
(expense), net

Commodities

6 Cost of sales

Foreign currency

(2 ) Other income
(expense), net

$ $ $ (55 )

17


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

10. Fair Value Measurement

The following table summarizes the bases used to determine the fair value of financial instruments outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Quoted Prices
in Active Significant
Markets for Other Significant
Identical Observable Unobservable
Fair Assets Inputs Inputs

Millions of dollars

Value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)

March 31, 2012:

Assets at fair value –

Derivatives:

Commodities

$ $ $ $

Foreign currency

3 3

$ 3 $ $ 3 $

Liabilities at fair value –

Derivatives:

Commodities

$ $ $ $

Warrants

4 4

$ 4 $ $ 4 $

December 31, 2011:

Assets at fair value –

Derivatives:

Commodities

$ 13 $ $ 13 $

$ 13 $ $ 13 $

Liabilities at fair value –

Derivatives:

Commodities

$ 1 $ $ 1 $

Warrants

19 19

Foreign currency

12 12

$ 32 $ $ 32 $

18


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Fair Value

Fair Value

Measurement

Measurement Using
Using Quoted Significant
prices in active Other
markets for Observable
identical assets Inputs

Millions of dollars

(Level 1) (Level 2)

Balance at January 1, 2012

$ $ 19

Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements

(25 )

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)

10

Balance at March 31, 2012

$ $ 4

Balance at January 1, 2011

$ 215 $

Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements

(49 )

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)

59

Balance at March 31, 2011

$ 225 $

The fair value of all non-derivative financial instruments included in current assets, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and accounts receivable, and accounts payable, approximated the applicable carrying value due to the short maturity of those instruments.

There were no financial instruments measured on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

The carrying value and the estimated fair value of our non-derivative financial instruments are shown in the table below:

March 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair

Millions of dollars

Value Value Value Value

Short and long-term debt, including current maturities

$ 4,021 $ 4,392 $ 4,026 $ 4,294

19


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain liabilities at fair value which are recorded at historical cost or amortized cost in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

Fair Value Measurement
Quoted prices Significant
Carrying Fair in active other Significant
Value Value markets for observable unobservable
March 31, March 31, identical assets inputs inputs

Millions of dollars

2012 2012 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)

Short-term debt:

Financial payables to equity investees

$ 10 $ 10 $ $ $ 10

Other

32 32 11 21

Long-term debt:

Senior Notes due 2017, $2,250 million, 8.0%

619 693 693

Senior Notes due 2017, € 375 million, 8.0%

138 154 154

Senior Notes due 2018, $3,240 million, 11.0%

1,922 2,114 2,114

Senior Notes due 2021, $1,000 million, 6.0%

1,000 1,050 1,050

Guaranteed Notes, due 2027, $300 million, 8.1%

300 339 339

Short term and long-term debt, including current maturities

$ 4,021 $ 4,392 $ $ 4,361 $ 31

20


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Fair Value Measurement
Quoted prices Significant
Carrying in active other Significant
Value Fair Value markets for observable unobservable
December 31, December 31, identical assets inputs inputs

Millions of dollars

2011 2011 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)

Short-term debt:

Financial payables to equity investees

$ 10 $ 10 $ $ $ 10

Other

38 38 10 28

Long-term debt:

Senior Notes due 2017, $2,250 million, 8.0%

619 672 672

Senior Notes due 2017, € 375 million, 8.0%

134 143 143

Senior Notes due 2018, $3,240 million, 11.0%

1,922 2,066 2,066

Senior Notes due 2021, $1,000 million, 6.0%

1,000 1,035 1,035

Guaranteed Notes, due 2027, $300 million, 8.1%

300 327 327

Other

3 3 3

Short term and long-term debt, including current maturities

$ 4,026 $ 4,294 $ $ 4,253 $ 41

For assets and liabilities classified as Level 1, the fair value is measured using quoted prices in active markets. The total fair value is either the price of the most recent trade at the time of the market close or the official close price, as defined by the exchange on which the asset is most actively traded on the last trading day of the period, multiplied by the number of units held without consideration of transaction costs.

For assets and liabilities classified as Level 2, fair value is based on the price a market participant would pay for the security, adjusted for the terms specific to that asset and liability. Broker quotes were obtained from well established and recognized vendors of market data for debt and commodity valuations.

The fair values of Level 3 instruments are determined using pricing data similar to that used in Level 2 financial instruments described above, and reflect adjustments for less liquid markets or longer contractual terms. For these Level 3 financial instruments, pricing data obtained from third party pricing sources is adjusted for the liquidity of the underlying over the contractual terms to develop an estimated price that market participants would use. Our valuation of these instruments considers specific contractual terms, present value concepts and other internal assumptions related to (i) contract maturities that extend beyond the periods in which quoted market prices are available; (ii) the uniqueness of the contract terms; and (iii) our creditworthiness or that of our counterparties (adjusted for collateral related to our asset positions). Based on our calculations, we expect that a significant portion of other debts will react in a generally proportionate manner to changes in the benchmark interest rate. Accordingly, these financial instruments are fair valued at par and are classified as Level 3.

21


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

11. Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits

Net periodic pension benefits included the following cost components for the three months ended March 31:

2012 2011

Millions of dollars

U.S. Non-U.S. U.S. Non-U.S.

Service cost

$ 12 $ 11 $ 11 $ 9

Interest cost

20 12 23 12

Expected return on plan assets

(30 ) (6 ) (26 ) (7 )

Curtailments and settlements loss

2

Amortization

5 1

Net periodic pension benefit costs

$ 7 $ 18 $ 8 $ 16

Net periodic other post-retirement benefits included the following cost components for the three months ended March 31:

2012 2011

Millions of dollars

U.S. Non-U.S. U.S. Non-U.S.

Service cost

$ 1 $ 1 $ 4 $ 2

Interest cost

3 4

Amortization

1

Net periodic benefit costs

$ 5 $ 1 $ 8 $ 2

The Company contributed $10 million to its pension plans during the three months ended March 31, 2012, which consisted of $8 million and $2 million to its U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans, respectively.

12. Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate of 33.5% for the first quarter 2012 resulted in a tax provision of $302 million on pre-tax income of $901 million. Our effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2011 was 28.5% resulting in tax expense of $263 million on pre-tax income of $923 million. The first quarter 2012 effective income tax rate is higher than the first quarter 2011 effective income tax rate primarily due to an increase in earnings in higher tax jurisdictions and taxable foreign currency gains.

The first quarter 2012 effective income tax rate was lower than the U.S. statutory 35% rate primarily due to the effect of pre-tax income in countries with lower statutory tax rates and favorable permanent adjustments related to equity earnings, notional royalties, release of valuation allowance, and the U.S. domestic production activity deduction, which were partially offset by unfavorable permanent adjustments related to the increase in uncertain tax reserves. The first quarter 2011 effective income tax rate was lower than the statutory 35% rate primarily due to the effect of pre-tax income in countries with lower statutory tax rates and tax deductible foreign currency losses which were partially offset by the non-deductible accrual of expense related to stock warrants.

22


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

13. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments —We have various purchase commitments for materials, supplies and services related to the ordinary conduct of business, generally for quantities required for our businesses and at prevailing market prices. These commitments are designed to assure sources of supply and are not expected to be in excess of normal requirements. Our capital expenditure commitments at March 31, 2012 were in the normal course of business.

Financial Assurance Instruments —We have obtained letters of credit, performance and surety bonds and have issued financial and performance guarantees to support trade payables, potential liabilities and other obligations. Management does not expect that any claims against or draws on these instruments would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. We have not experienced any unmanageable difficulty in obtaining the required financial assurance instruments for our current operations.

Environmental Remediation —Our accrued liability for future environmental remediation costs at current and former plant sites and other remediation sites totaled $132 million and $120 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. At March 31, 2012, the accrued liabilities for individual sites range from less than $1 million to $23 million. The remediation expenditures are expected to occur over a number of years, and not to be concentrated in any single year. In our opinion, it is reasonably possible that losses in excess of the liabilities recorded may have been incurred. However, we cannot estimate any amount or range of such possible additional losses. New information about sites, new technology or future developments such as involvement in investigations by regulatory agencies, could require us to reassess our potential exposure related to environmental matters.

The following table summarizes the activity in our accrued environmental liability included in “Accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities”:

Three Months Ended

Millions of dollars

March 31, 2012 March 31, 2011

Balance at beginning of period

$ 120 $ 107

Additional provisions

12 4

Amounts paid

(3 ) (3 )

Foreign exchange effects

3 5

Balance at end of period

$ 132 $ 113

Litigation and Other Matters

Access Indemnity Demand —On December 20, 2010, one of our subsidiaries received demand letters from affiliates of Access Industries, (collectively, “Access”) a more than five percent shareholder of the Company. We conducted an initial investigation of the facts underlying the demand letters and engaged in discussions with Access. We requested that Access withdraw its demands with prejudice and, and on January 17, 2011, Access declined to withdraw the demands, with or without prejudice.

Specifically, Access affiliates Nell Limited (“Nell”) and BI S.á.r.l. (“BI”) have demanded that LyondellBasell Industries Holdings B.V. (“LBIH”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, indemnify them and their shareholders, members, affiliates, officers, directors, employees and other related parties for all losses, including attorney’s fees and expenses, arising out of a pending lawsuit styled Edward S. Weisfelner, as Litigation Trustee of the LB Litigation Trust v. Leonard Blavatnik, et al., Adversary Proceeding No. 09-1375 (REG), in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York.

23


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In the Weisfelner lawsuit, the plaintiffs seek to recover damages from numerous parties, including Nell, Access and their affiliates. The damages sought from Nell, Access and their affiliates include, among other things, the return of all amounts earned by them related to their acquisition of shares of Lyondell Chemical prior to its acquisition by Basell AF S.C.A. in December 2007, distributions by Basell AF S.C.A. to its shareholders before it acquired Lyondell Chemical, and management and transaction fees and expenses. The trial that was scheduled for October 2011 has been postponed.

Nell and BI have also demanded that LBIH pay $50 million in management fees for each of 2009 and 2010 and that LBIH pay other unspecified amounts relating to advice purportedly given, prior to the Predecessor company’s chapter 11 filing, in connection with financing and other strategic transactions.

Nell and BI assert that LBIH’s responsibility for indemnity and the claimed fees and expenses arise out of a management agreement entered into on December 11, 2007, between Nell and Basell AF S.C.A. They assert that LBIH, as a former subsidiary of Basell AF S.C.A., is jointly and severally liable for Basell AF S.C.A.’s obligations under the agreement, notwithstanding that LBIH was not a signatory to the agreement and the liabilities of Basell AF S.C.A., which was a signatory, were discharged in the LyondellBasell bankruptcy proceedings.

On June 26, 2009, Nell filed a proof of claim in Bankruptcy Court against LyondellBasell AF (successor to Basell AF S.C.A.) seeking “no less than” $723 thousand for amounts allegedly owed under the 2007 management agreement. On April 27, 2011, Lyondell Chemical filed an objection to Nell’s claim and, together with LyondellBasell N.V. (successor to LyondellBasell AF) and LBIH, brought a declaratory judgment action in the Bankruptcy Court for a determination that Nell and BI’s demands are not valid. By a Joint Stipulated Order dated June 13, 2011, the declaratory judgment action is stayed pending the outcome of the Weisfelner lawsuit.

We do not believe that the management agreement is in effect or that the Company, LBIH, or any other Company-affiliated entity owes any obligations under the management agreement. We intend to defend vigorously our position in any proceedings and against any claims or demands that may be asserted.

We cannot at this time estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that Nell, Access, or their affiliates may incur as a result of the lawsuit, and therefore we cannot at this time estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that Nell, Access, or their affiliates may seek from LBIH by way of indemnity.

Indemnification —We are parties to various indemnification arrangements, including arrangements entered into in connection with acquisitions, divestitures and the formation of joint ventures. Pursuant to these arrangements, we provide indemnification to and/or receive indemnification from other parties in connection with liabilities that may arise in connection with the transactions and in connection with activities prior to completion of the transactions. These indemnification arrangements typically include provisions pertaining to third party claims relating to environmental and tax matters and various types of litigation. As of March 31, 2012, we had not accrued any significant amounts for our indemnification obligations, and we are not aware of other circumstances that would likely lead to significant future indemnification obligations. We cannot determine with certainty the potential amount of future payments under the indemnification arrangements until events arise that would trigger a liability under the arrangements.

In addition, certain third parties entered into agreements with the Predecessor, LyondellBasell AF, to indemnify LyondellBasell AF for a significant portion of the potential obligations that could arise with respect to costs relating to contamination at various sites in Europe. These indemnity obligations are currently in dispute.

24


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As part of our technology licensing contracts, we give indemnifications to our licensees for liabilities arising from possible patent infringement claims with respect to proprietary licensed technology. Such indemnifications have a stated maximum amount and generally cover a period of five to ten years.

Other —We previously identified an agreement related to a former project in Kazakhstan under which a payment was made that raises compliance concerns under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). We have engaged outside counsel to investigate these activities, under the oversight of the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board, and to evaluate internal controls and compliance policies and procedures. In this respect, we may not have conducted business in compliance with the FCPA and may not have had policies and procedures in place adequate to ensure compliance. We made a voluntary disclosure of these matters to the U.S. Department of Justice and are cooperating fully with that agency. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters at this time since our investigations are ongoing. Therefore, we cannot reasonably estimate a range of liability for any potential penalty resulting from these matters. Violations of these laws could result in criminal and civil liabilities and other forms of relief that could be material to us.

General —In our opinion, the matters discussed in this note are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position or liquidity of LyondellBasell N.V. However, the adverse resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material impact on our results of operations for that period, which may be mitigated by contribution or indemnification obligations of others, or by any insurance coverage that may be available.

14. Stockholders’ Equity and Non-Controlling Interests

Dividend distribution —We may pay unlimited restricted payments, including dividend distributions, pursuant to certain terms in our 8% senior notes and 11% senior notes as well as our U.S. ABL Facility as long as specific leverage and liquidity ratios are maintained. Under the terms of the indentures governing the senior 8% and 11% notes, we can pay unlimited restricted payments if we maintain a two-to-one leverage ratio before any restricted payments may be made and after the effect of any such payments. Under the U.S. ABL Facility we can pay unlimited restricted payments if we maintain availability of at least thirty percent of the facility both before and after any restricted payments.

On April 4 , 2012, we executed amendments to indentures governing the 8% senior notes and 11% senior notes to eliminate essentially all restrictive covenants, including the limitations on restricted payments.

25


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Ordinary shares —The changes in the outstanding amounts of ordinary shares issued were as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31,
2012 2011

Ordinary shares outstanding:

Balance at beginning of period

573,390,514 565,676,222

Share-based compensation

478,719 10,508

Warrants exercised

598,023 2,327,326

Balance at end of period

574,467,256 568,014,056

Ordinary shares held as treasury shares:

Balance at beginning of period

4,051,013 1,122,651

Warrants exercised

263,056 20,453

Share-based compensation

(478,719 ) (9,963 )

Balance at end of period

3,835,350 1,133,141

Ordinary shares issued at end of period

578,302,606 569,147,197

Non-controlling Interests —Losses attributable to non-controlling interests consisted of the following components:

Three Months
Ended March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Non-controlling interests’ comprehensive income (loss):

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests

$ (1 ) $ 2

Fixed operating fees paid to Lyondell Chemical by the PO/SM II partners

(5 )

Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests

$ (1 ) $ (3 )

15. Per Share Data

Basic earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of certain stock option awards. We have unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units that are considered participating securities for earnings per share.

26


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Earnings per share data and dividends declared per share of common stock were as follows:

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Basic:

Net income

$ 599 $ 660

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

1 3

Net income attributable to the Company

600 663

Net income attributable to participating securities

(3 ) (4 )

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$ 597 $ 659

Diluted:

Net income

$ 599 $ 660

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

1 3

Net income attributable to the Company

600 663

Net income attributable to participating securities

(3 ) (4 )

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$ 597 $ 659

Millions of shares

Basic weighted average common stock outstanding

572 566

Effect of dilutive securities:

Stock options

3 3

Potential dilutive shares

575 569

Earnings per share:

Basic

$ 1.04 $ 1.16

Diluted

$ 1.04 $ 1.15

Millions of shares

Anti-dilutive warrants

9.2

Participating securities

3.7 3.6

Dividends declared per share of common stock

$ 0.25 $

27


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

16. Segment and Related Information

We operate in five segments:

Olefins and Polyolefins—Americas, primarily manufacturing and marketing of olefins, including ethylene and its co-products, primarily propylene, butadiene, and aromatics, which include benzene and toluene; polyolefins, including polyethylene, comprising high density polyethylene (“HDPE”), low density polyethylene (“LDPE”) and linear low density polyethylene (“LLDPE”), and polypropylene; and Catalloy process resins;

Olefins and Polyolefins—Europe, Asia, International (“O&P–EAI”), primarily manufacturing and marketing of olefins, including ethylene and its co-products, primarily propylene and butadiene; polyolefins, including polyethylene, comprising HDPE, LDPE, and polypropylene; polypropylene-based compounds, materials and alloys (“PP Compounds”), Catalloy process resins and polybutene-1 polymers;

Intermediates and Derivatives (“I&D”), primarily manufacturing and marketing of propylene oxide (“PO”); PO co-products, including styrene and the TBA intermediates tertiary butyl alcohol (“TBA”), isobutylene and tertiary butyl hydroperoxide; PO derivatives, including propylene glycol, propylene glycol ethers and butanediol; ethylene derivatives, including ethylene glycol, ethylene oxide (“EO”), and other EO derivatives; acetyls, including vinyl acetate monomer, acetic acid and methanol;

Refining and Oxyfuels, primarily manufacturing and marketing of refined petroleum products, including gasoline, ultra-low sulfur diesel, jet fuel, lubricants (“lube oils”), alkylate, and oxygenated fuels, or oxyfuels, such as methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) and ethyl tertiary butyl ether (“ETBE”); and

Technology, primarily licensing of polyolefin process technologies and supply of polyolefin catalysts and advanced catalysts.

28


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Summarized financial information concerning reportable segments is shown in the following table for the periods presented:

Millions of dollars

Olefins  and
Polyolefins—

Americas
Olefins and
Polyolefins—
Europe,
Asia &
International
Intermediates
& Derivatives
Refining
and
Oxyfuels
Technology Other Total

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Sales and other operating revenues:

Customers

$ 2,403 $ 3,748 $ 1,630 $ 4,001 $ 89 $ 8 $ 11,879

Intersegment

946 118 69 260 30 (1,423 )

3,349 3,866 1,699 4,261 119 (1,415 ) 11,879

Operating income

519 5 245 140 38 (1 ) 946

Income from equity investments

6 40 46

Millions of dollars

Olefins and
Polyolefins—
Americas
Olefins and
Polyolefins—
Europe,
Asia &
International
Intermediates
& Derivatives
Refining
and
Oxyfuels
Technology Other Total

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Sales and other operating revenues:

Customers

$ 2,435 $ 3,853 $ 1,671 $ 4,172 $ 109 $ 12 $ 12,252

Intersegment

1,137 91 21 548 30 (1,827 )

3,572 3,944 1,692 4,720 139 (1,815 ) 12,252

Operating income

421 179 234 164 66 1 1,065

Income from equity investments

3 51 4 58

Sales and other operating revenues and operating income (loss) in the “Other” column above include elimination of intersegment transactions.

29


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In the first quarter of 2012, operating results for the Refining and Oxyfuels segment include a $42 million benefit related to the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities associated with the Berre refinery. Inventory levels at the Berre refinery decreased during the first quarter 2012 following the suspension of operations on January 4, 2012. In addition, a $41 charge related to the interim liquidation of LIFO inventory, which is expected to be sustained through the end of the year, is included in the first quarter 2012 operating results of the O&P- Americas segment. Inventory levels, which were increased in the fourth quarter 2011 in preparation for a turnaround at our Channelview, Texas facility, decreased during the first quarter 2012 following the commencement of the turnaround. Also in the first quarter 2012, operating results for the O&P-EAI segment included a charge of $22 million for impairment of assets at our Wesseling, Germany site.

17. Subsequent Events

LyondellBasell N.V. has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. Subsequent events have been disclosed throughout the document.

18. Supplemental Guarantor Information

LyondellBasell N.V. and Lyondell Chemical have cross guaranteed the others’ publicly traded debt securities. Subject to certain exceptions, each of our existing and future wholly owned U.S. restricted subsidiaries other than any such subsidiary that is a subsidiary of a non-U.S. subsidiary (the “Subsidiary Guarantors” and, together with LyondellBasell N.V., the “Guarantors”) has also guaranteed the Senior Notes. Each Subsidiary Guarantor is 100% owned by LyondellBasell N.V. and the guarantees are all joint and several, full and unconditional.

There are no significant restrictions that would impede the Guarantors from obtaining funds by dividend or loan from their subsidiaries. Subsidiaries are generally prohibited from entering into arrangements that would limit their ability to make dividends to or enter into loans with the Guarantors.

As a result of these guarantee arrangements, we are required to present the following condensed consolidating financial information. In this note, LCC refers to Lyondell Chemical Company without its subsidiaries.

30


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

BALANCE SHEET

As of March 31, 2012

Consolidated
LyondellBasell Non- LyondellBasell

Millions of dollars

N.V. LCC Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations N.V.

Cash and cash equivalents

$ $ 938 $ 41 $ 691 $ $ 1,670

Restricted cash

1 8 9

Accounts receivable

358 1,354 2,497 4,209

Accounts receivable—affiliates

308 2,167 1,113 (3,588 )

Inventories

547 2,694 1,967 5,208

Notes receivable—affiliates, current

25 7 3,772 575 (4,379 )

Other current assets

184 256 687 (125 ) 1,002

Property, plant and equipment, net

361 3,190 3,875 7,426

Investments in subsidiaries

14,557 13,284 3,088 (30,929 )

Other investments and long-term receivables

2,096 2,096

Notes receivable—affiliates, non-current

1,000 667 535 2,099 (4,301 )

Other assets, net

17 638 1,054 726 (446 ) 1,989

Total assets

$ 15,599 $ 17,292 $ 18,152 $ 16,334 $ (43,768 ) $ 23,609

Current maturities of long-term debt

$ $ $ $ $ $

Short-term debt

12 30 42

Notes payable—affiliates, current

576 3,795 12 (4,383 )

Accounts payable

11 224 1,028 2,282 3,545

Accounts payable—affiliates

1 2,915 174 493 (3,583 )

Other current liabilities

65 193 612 732 (243 ) 1,359

Long-term debt

1,000 2,679 5 300 3,984

Notes payable—affiliates, non-current

2,635 2,781 9,616 (15,032 )

Other liabilities

500 604 1,177 2,281

Deferred income taxes

1 788 467 (221 ) 1,035

Company share of stockholders’ equity

11,310 4,205 5,313 10,788 (20,306 ) 11,310

Non-controlling interests

53 53

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 15,599 $ 17,292 $ 18,152 $ 16,334 $ (43,768 ) $ 23,609

31


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

BALANCE SHEET

As of December 31, 2011

Consolidated
LyondellBasell Non- LyondellBasell

Millions of dollars

N.V. LCC Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations N.V.

Cash and cash equivalents

$ $ 394 $ 50 $ 621 $ $ 1,065

Restricted cash

53 53

Accounts receivable

340 1,240 2,198 3,778

Accounts receivable—affiliates

13 736 2,297 1,028 (4,074 )

Inventories

597 2,862 2,040 5,499

Notes receivable—affiliates, current

86 2 3,640 509 (4,237 )

Other current assets

1 550 94 616 (221 ) 1,040

Property, plant and equipment, net

363 3,111 3,859 7,333

Investments in subsidiaries

13,643 12,558 3,065 (29,266 )

Other investments and long-term receivables

2,043 2,043

Notes receivable—affiliates, non-current

1,000 660 535 2,100 (4,295 )

Other assets, net

26 639 1,076 738 (451 ) 2,028

Total assets

$ 14,769 $ 16,839 $ 17,970 $ 15,805 $ (42,544 ) $ 22,839

Current maturities of long-term debt

$ $ $ $ 4 $ $ 4

Short-term debt

11 37 48

Notes payable—affiliates, current

510 3,653 83 (4,246 )

Accounts payable

1 214 1,095 2,104 3,414

Accounts payable—affiliates

3 3,071 595 395 (4,064 )

Other current liabilities

27 254 729 763 (221 ) 1,552

Long-term debt

1,000 2,675 5 300 3,980

Notes payable—affiliates, non-current

2,635 2,765 9,463 (14,863 )

Other liabilities

601 605 1,071 2,277

Deferred income taxes

764 486 (333 ) 917

Company share of stockholders’ equity

10,593 3,606 4,703 10,508 (18,817 ) 10,593

Non-controlling interests

54 54

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 14,769 $ 16,839 $ 17,970 $ 15,805 $ (42,544 ) $ 22,839

32


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF INCOME

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Consolidated
LyondellBasell Non- LyondellBasell

Millions of dollars

N.V. LCC Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations N.V.

Sales and other operating revenues

$ $ 1,247 $ 6,422 $ 5,114 $ (904 ) $ 11,879

Cost of sales

944 5,719 4,911 (904 ) 10,670

Selling, general and administrative expenses

4 84 17 119 224

Research and development expenses

5 7 27 39

Operating income (loss)

(4 ) 214 679 57 946

Interest income (expense), net

(23 ) (104 ) 16 15 1 (95 )

Other income (expense), net

(4 ) 1 8 (5 ) (1 ) (1 )

Income from equity investments

650 471 136 46 (1,257 ) 46

Reorganization items

5 5

Provision for income taxes

(19 ) (7 ) (257 ) (19 ) (302 )

Net income

600 575 587 94 (1,257 ) 599

Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

1 1

Net income attributable to the Company

$ 600 $ 575 $ 587 $ 95 $ (1,257 ) $ 600

Comprehensive income attributable to the Company

$ 809 $ 577 $ 589 $ 301 $ (1,467 ) $ 809

33


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF INCOME

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Consolidated
LyondellBasell Non- LyondellBasell

Millions of dollars

N.V. LCC Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations N.V.

Sales and other operating revenues

$ $ 1,208 $ 6,079 $ 5,972 $ (1,007 ) $ 12,252

Cost of sales

1,114 5,319 5,517 (1,007 ) 10,943

Selling, general and administrative expenses

3 77 18 113 211

Research and development expenses

7 26 33

Operating income (loss)

(3 ) 17 735 316 1,065

Interest income (expense), net

8 (157 ) (5 ) (1 ) (155 )

Other income (expense), net

(54 ) (16 ) (6 ) 33 (43 )

Income (loss) from equity investments

688 478 (80 ) 58 (1,086 ) 58

Reorganization items

(1 ) (1 ) (2 )

(Provision for) benefit from income taxes

24 57 (264 ) (80 ) (263 )

Net income

663 378 380 325 (1,086 ) 660

Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

3 3

Net income attributable to the Company

$ 663 $ 378 $ 380 $ 328 $ (1,086 ) $ 663

Comprehensive income attributable to the Company

$ 1,042 $ 378 $ 380 $ 707 $ (1,465 ) $ 1,042

34


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Consolidated
LyondellBasell Non- LyondellBasell

Millions of dollars

N.V. LCC Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations N.V.

Net cash provided by operating activities

$ 14 $ 411 $ 259 $ 237 $ $ 921

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment

(10 ) (148 ) (70 ) (228 )

Proceeds from disposal of assets

4 4

Restricted cash

(1 ) 45 44

Loans to affiliates

12 (126 ) (128 ) 242

Other

(5 ) (5 )

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

2 (271 ) (158 ) 242 (185 )

Proceeds from issuance of shares upon exercise of warrants

1 1

Dividends paid

(143 ) (143 )

Proceeds from short-term debt

10 10

Repayments of short-term debt

(19 ) (19 )

Repayments of long-term debt

(2 ) (2 )

Proceeds from (repayments of) notes payable to affiliates

128 129 (15 ) (242 )

Other, net

2 3 5

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(14 ) 131 3 (26 ) (242 ) (148 )

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

17 17

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

544 (9 ) 70 605

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

394 50 621 1,065

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ $ 938 $ 41 $ 691 $ $ 1,670

35


Table of Contents

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Consolidated
LyondellBasell Non- LyondellBasell

Millions of dollars

N.V. LCC Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations N.V.

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$ (37 ) $ (326 ) $ 385 $ 199 $ $ 221

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment

(2 ) (163 ) (56 ) (221 )

Proceeds from disposal of assets

5 5

Loans to affiliates

32 (176 ) 144

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

30 (339 ) (51 ) 144 (216 )

Proceeds from issuance of shares upon exercise of warrants

37 37

Proceeds from (repayments of) notes payable to affiliates

228 (63 ) (21 ) (144 )

Other, net

(9 ) (9 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

37 219 (63 ) (21 ) (144 ) 28

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

128 128

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(77 ) (17 ) 255 161

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

1,926 185 2,111 4,222

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ $ 1,849 $ 168 $ 2,366 $ $ 4,383

36


Table of Contents
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the information contained in our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes elsewhere in this report. When we use the terms “we,” “us,” “our” or similar words in this discussion, unless the context otherwise requires, we are referring to LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

In addition to comparisons of current operating results with the same period in the prior year, we have included trailing quarter comparisons of our first quarter 2012 operating results to our results in the fourth quarter 2011. Because many of our businesses are highly cyclical and also subject to some less significant seasonal effects, trailing quarter comparisons may offer important insight into current business direction.

References to industry benchmark prices or costs, including the weighted average cost of ethylene production, are generally to industry prices and costs reported by CMAI. However, references to industry benchmarks for refining and oxyfuels market margins are to industry prices reported by Platts, a reporting service of The McGraw-Hill Companies, and crude oil and natural gas benchmark price references are to Bloomberg.

OVERVIEW

Our performance is driven by global economic conditions generally and their impact on demand for our products. Additionally, raw material and energy prices significantly impact our operating results. Finally, industry-specific issues, such as our own production capacity and capacity within the chemicals and refining industries, can have material effects on our results of operations.

Our first quarter 2012 results of operations reflect the continued economic uncertainties caused by weakness in Europe and uncertainty surrounding the growth outlook for China. Notwithstanding these uncertainties, we saw improved conditions in the U.S. Our O&P-Americas and Refining & Oxyfuels segments continued to benefit from raw material cost advantages generated by the spread between global crude prices and the North American prices for natural gas and natural gas liquids. Our North American refining business began the first quarter 2012 with low margins that improved over the course of the quarter, which in part reflected our flexibility to purchase heavy crude oil at discounts to the price for Brent crude oil.

We ceased operations at the Berre refinery in early January 2012, exiting an under-performing business. In April 2012, we also refinanced nearly $3 billion of our debt with new debt issuances of unsecured senior notes, significantly improving our debt structure. In addition, we expect to refinance our $2 billion U.S. ABL Facility with an unsecured revolving credit facility during the second quarter of 2012.

37


Table of Contents

Results of operations for the periods discussed in these “Results of Operations” are presented in the table below.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues

$ 11,879 $ 12,252

Cost of sales

10,670 10,943

Selling, general and administrative expenses

224 211

Research and development expenses

39 33

Operating income

946 1,065

Interest expense

(99 ) (163 )

Interest income

4 8

Other income (expense), net

(1 ) (43 )

Income from equity investments

46 58

Reorganization items

5 (2 )

Provision for income taxes

302 263

Net income

$ 599 $ 660

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues —Revenues decreased by $373 million, or 3%, in the first quarter 2012 compared to the first quarter 2011. The suspension of operations at the Berre refinery on January 4, 2012 resulted in a revenue decrease of 8%. Excluding the Berre refinery revenues, higher sales volumes, mainly at the Houston refinery and in oxyfuels, were responsible for a revenue increase of 2% in the first quarter 2012, while higher average sales prices for most products were responsible for a revenue increase of 3%, compared to the same period in 2011. Sales prices averaged higher in the first quarter 2012 for most products except for those in our O&P-EAI segment, which averaged lower compared to first quarter 2011.

Cost of Sales —The $273 million decrease in cost of sales for the first quarter 2012 primarily reflects the suspension of operations at the Berre refinery in early January 2012 and lower raw material costs for North American olefins. The lower price of NGL-based liquid raw materials used in North American olefins in the first quarter 2012 more than offset the higher price of heavy liquids-based raw materials. The higher prices of crude oil contributed to higher raw material costs, particularly at the Houston refinery and in the O&P-EAI segment. These higher costs partially offset the decreases in raw material costs at the Berre refinery and for North American olefins. Cost of sales in the first quarter 2012 also included charges totaling $22 million for impairment of assets, primarily related to damage to our LDPE plant in Wesseling, Germany resulting from an explosion in a reactor bay in January 2012.

SG&A Expenses —Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the first quarter 2012 were higher by $13 million compared to the first quarter 2011. The increase reflects higher costs related to employee compensation and benefits.

Operating Income —The decrease in operating income in the first quarter 2012, compared to the first quarter 2011, reflects lower operating results for our O&P-EAI, Refining and Oxyfuels and Technology segments, partially offset by higher operating results for our O&P-Americas and I&D segments. Operating results for each of our business segments are reviewed further in the “Segment Analysis” section below.

Interest Expense —Interest expense was $64 million lower in the first quarter 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to the repayment of debt. Since the beginning of the second quarter 2011, we repaid $1,407 million and €234 million ($324 million) of our 8% senior notes due 2017, $1,319 million of our 11% senior notes due 2018 and the remaining $5 million outstanding under our Senior Term Loan Facility. The reduction in interest expense resulting from these repayments was partially offset by interest expense on our 6% senior notes due 2021 that were issued in November 2011.

38


Table of Contents

Other Expense, net— Other expense, net, in the first quarter 2012 included the negative effect of a $10 million charge related to the fair value adjustments of warrants to purchase our ordinary shares, partially offset by $7 million of income, related to the gain on sale of railcars and refunds on sales tax, and a $2 million gain on foreign exchange. In the first quarter 2011, Other expense, net, included the negative effect of $59 million for the fair value adjustment of the warrants, partially offset by $10 million of foreign exchange gains.

Income from Equity Investments— Income from equity investments decreased $12 million in the first quarter 2012, compared to the first quarter 2011, primarily due to lower operating results at two of our joint ventures in Saudi Arabia, SPC and Al Waha, our HMC Polymers joint venture in Thailand and our Polymirae joint venture in South Korea. These decreases were partially offset by higher operating results at our SEPC joint venture in Saudi Arabia. The lower operating results primarily reflected lower polypropylene margins resulting from increases in propane prices, planned maintenance turnaround activities at HMC and an unplanned outage at Al Waha resulting from a power failure. Higher first quarter 2012 operating results for our SEPC joint venture primarily reflected the effect of higher sales volumes compared to the first quarter 2011, which was negatively impacted by unplanned outages.

Income Tax— Our effective income tax rate of 33.5% for the first quarter of 2012 resulted in a tax provision of $302 million on pretax income of $901 million. Our effective income tax rate for the first quarter 2011 was 28.5% resulting in tax expense of $263 million on pre-tax income of $923 million. The first quarter 2012 effective income tax rate is higher than the first quarter 2011 effective tax rate primarily due to an increase in earnings in higher tax jurisdictions and taxable foreign currency gains.

The 2012 effective income tax rate was lower than the U.S. statutory 35% rate primarily due to the effect of pretax income in countries with lower statutory tax rates and favorable permanent adjustments related to equity earnings, notional royalties, release of valuation allowance, and the U.S. domestic production activity deduction, which were partially offset by unfavorable permanent adjustments related to the increase in uncertain tax reserves and taxable foreign currency gains. The 2011 effective income tax rate was lower than the statutory 35% rate primarily due to the effect of pretax income in countries with lower statutory tax rates and tax deductible foreign currency losses which were partially offset by the non-deductible accrual of expense related to stock warrants.

Net Income —The following table summarizes the major components contributing to net income:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Operating income

$ 946 $ 1,065

Interest expense, net

(95 ) (155 )

Other income (expense), net

(1 ) (43 )

Income from equity investments

46 58

Reorganization items

5 (2 )

Provision for income taxes

302 263

Net income

$ 599 $ 660

Comprehensive Income —Comprehensive income decreased by $233 million compared to the first quarter 2011 primarily as a result of currency translation adjustments arising from the financial statements of our non-U.S. subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The predominant local currency of our operations outside of the United States is the Euro. The decrease of the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro in the first quarter of 2012 was lower than that experienced in the first quarter 2011 resulting in a lower gain as reflected in the Statements of Comprehensive Income.

39


Table of Contents

First Quarter 2012 versus Fourth Quarter 2011 —We had net income of $599 million in the first quarter 2012 compared to a net loss of $218 million in the fourth quarter 2011. Net income in the first quarter included pretax charges totaling $32 million related to the impairment of assets and the fair value adjustment of our outstanding warrants. The fourth quarter net loss reflected pretax charges totaling $614 million related to the early repayment of debt, reorganization items, the anticipated cost of the social plan related to the suspension of operations at the Berre refinery, corporate restructurings, environmental charges and fair value adjustment of our outstanding warrants. These fourth quarter charges were partially offset by a $15 million pretax settlement related to the 2008 crane collapse at our Houston refinery.

Apart from these items, net income in the first quarter primarily reflected an overall improvement in the operating results of our business segments and lower interest expense, compared to the fourth quarter. Our first quarter operating results reflected higher margins for ethylene and ethylene co-products in our O&P—Americas segment, and in our Refining and Oxyfuels segment, higher refining margins at the Houston refinery and unseasonably strong oxyfuels margins. First quarter operating results for our I&D and O&P-EAI segments reflected higher sales volumes across most products. These volume improvements reflected the completion of planned maintenance activities by the I&D segment and for the O&P—EAI segment, an improvement from the fourth quarter economic slowdown that particularly affected Europe. Our first quarter interest expense was significantly lower than the fourth quarter, which included premiums and other fees related to the $2,802 prepayment of debt. The effect of the improvement in our pretax income was partially offset by a $302 million provision for income taxes in the first quarter compared to a $92 million tax benefit in the fourth quarter. The $394 million increase in tax expense was primarily attributable to higher actual earnings.

40


Table of Contents

Segment Analysis

Our operations are divided into five reportable segments: O&P—Americas; O&P—EAI; I&D; Refining and Oxyfuels; and Technology.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues:

O&P—Americas segment

$ 3,349 $ 3,572

O&P—EAI segment

3,866 3,944

I&D segment

1,699 1,692

Refining and Oxyfuels segment

4,261 4,720

Technology segment

119 139

Other, including intersegment eliminations

(1,415 ) (1,815 )

Total

$ 11,879 $ 12,252

Operating income (loss):

O&P—Americas segment

$ 519 $ 421

O&P—EAI segment

5 179

I&D segment

245 234

Refining and Oxyfuels segment

140 164

Technology segment

38 66

Other, including intersegment eliminations

(1 ) 1

Total

$ 946 $ 1,065

Income from equity investments:

O&P—Americas segment

$ 6 $ 3

O&P—EAI segment

40 51

I&D segment

4

Total

$ 46 $ 58

Olefins and Polyolefins—Americas Segment

Overview —The benefit experienced by the U.S. ethylene industry from processing natural gas liquids continued through the first quarter of 2012. Ethylene produced from natural gas liquids is currently lower in cost compared to that produced from crude oil-based liquids, which is the predominant feedstock used in the rest of the world. Slightly lower industry volumes for ethylene in the first quarter of 2012, compared to the same 2011 period, reflects scheduled maintenance turnaround activity at some ethylene crackers during the quarter.

Ethylene margins were stronger in the first quarter 2012, compared to the first quarter 2011, primarily due to higher average sales prices coupled with lower prices for ethane raw materials. In the first quarter 2012, market demand for polyethylene decreased compared to the first quarter 2011, while market demand for polypropylene increased.

Ethylene Raw Materials— Benchmark crude oil and natural gas prices generally have been indicators of the level and direction of the movement of raw material and energy costs for ethylene and its co-products in the O&P—Americas segment. Ethylene and its co-products are produced from two major raw material groups:

crude oil-based liquids (“liquids” or “heavy liquids”), including naphtha, condensates, and gas oils, the prices of which are generally related to crude oil prices; and

41


Table of Contents

natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), principally ethane and propane, the prices of which are generally affected by natural gas prices.

Although the prices of these raw materials are generally related to crude oil and natural gas prices, during specific periods the relationships among these materials and benchmarks may vary significantly.

In the U.S., we have significant capability to shift the ratio of raw materials used in the production of ethylene and its co-products to take advantage of the relative costs of heavy liquids and NGLs.

Production economics for the U.S. industry have continued to favor NGLs through the first quarter 2012. As a result, we maintained our focus on maximizing the use of NGLs at our U.S. plants. Approximately 82% and 70% of our ethylene production was from NGLs during the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively. The utilization of NGLs in the first quarter 2012 was affected by maintenance turnaround activity at our Channelview site, while the 2011 rate of utilization was affected by a temporary disruption of NGLs deliveries from one of our suppliers. Based on current trends and assuming the price of crude oil remains at a high level relative to natural gas, we would expect production economics in the U.S. to continue to favor NGLs for the near and mid-term.

The following table shows the average U.S. benchmark prices for crude oil and natural gas for the applicable periods, as well as benchmark U.S. sales prices for ethylene and propylene, which we produce and sell or consume internally, and certain polyethylene and polypropylene products. The benchmark weighted average cost of ethylene production, which is reduced by co-product revenues, is based on CMAI’s estimated ratio of heavy liquid raw materials and NGLs used in U.S. ethylene production.

Average Benchmark Price and Percent Change
Versus Prior Year Period Average
Three months ended
March 31,
2012 2011 Change

Crude oil (WTI)—dollars per barrel

103.03 94.60 9 %

Natural gas (Henry Hub)—dollars per million BTUs

2.65 4.19 (37 )%

United States—cents per pound:

Weighted average U.S. cost of ethylene production

28.5 32.6 (13 )%

Ethylene

54.9 49.3 11 %

Polyethylene (HD)

92.0 87.7 5 %

Propylene—polymer grade

67.2 71.7 (6 )%

Polypropylene

93.7 100.8 (7 )%

42


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the O&P—Americas segment’s sales and other operating revenues, operating income, income from equity investments and selected product sales volumes.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues

$ 3,349 $ 3,572

Operating income

519 421

Income from equity investments

6 3

Production Volumes, in millions of pounds

Ethylene

1,988 2,089

Propylene

533 769

Sales Volumes, in millions of pounds

Polyethylene

1,448 1,405

Polypropylene

650 585

Revenues —O&P—Americas revenues decreased by $223 million, or 6%, in the first quarter 2012, compared to the first quarter 2011. Lower olefin and olefin co-products sales volumes in the first quarter 2012 due to planned maintenance were primarily responsible for a revenue decrease of 10%. The decrease was only partially offset by higher average sales prices for most products, which increased revenues by 4%. First quarter 2012 revenues for polyethylene reflect sales volumes and average sales prices that were relatively unchanged from the first quarter 2011. For polypropylene, higher North American sales volumes in the 2012 period were substantially offset by lower average sales prices. Market demand in the first quarter 2011 reflected the negative effect of rising propylene prices on customer buying patterns.

Operating Income —Operating income for the O&P—Americas segment in the first quarter 2012 increased by $98 million compared to the first quarter 2011. Operating results in the first quarter 2012 reflected higher ethylene margins, partially offset by lower polyethylene margins. The increase in ethylene margins primarily reflects the effect of higher average sales prices for ethylene and fuel co-products coupled with lower raw material costs. In the first quarter 2012, price decreases for the NGL-based raw material, ethane, more than offset the price increases for crude-oil based liquids raw materials. The lower polyethylene margins reflected the higher price of ethylene, which more than offset the increase in higher average sales prices during the first quarter 2012. Polypropylene results in the first quarter 2012 were comparable to the first quarter 2011.

First Quarter 2012 versus Fourth Quarter 2011 —The O&P—Americas segment had operating income of $519 million in the first quarter 2012, compared to $328 million in the fourth quarter 2011. First quarter operating results include the impact of a major turnaround at our Channelview, Texas site, while fourth quarter operating results were negatively impacted by increases in raw material prices. The increase in operating results for the first quarter 2012 reflects higher product margins across most major products, particularly ethylene and ethylene co-products. The higher product margins primarily reflect higher average sales prices across most major products and the lower cost of ethylene production from ethane. Sales volumes in the first quarter 2012 were higher compared to the fourth quarter 2011.

Olefins and Polyolefins—Europe, Asia and International Segment

Overview —Market conditions improved during the first quarter 2012 compared to the latter part of 2011 which was challenged by a slowdown, particularly in Europe, amid uncertainty and poor economic conditions. European demand for ethylene and polyolefins improved in the first quarter 2012 to the levels seen in the third quarter 2011. Margins in the commodity ethylene chain continued to be challenged by higher raw material costs coupled with weak local economic conditions. Despite higher benchmark average sales prices for ethylene, industry margins decreased in the first quarter 2012 as the benchmark weighted average cost of ethylene production increased more than the benchmark average sales price primarily due to the higher cost of naphtha raw materials.

43


Table of Contents

Although first quarter 2012 operating results for the O&P-EAI segment reflected an improvement over results for the fourth quarter 2011, compared to the first quarter 2011, results were lower across most businesses. These lower results reflected lower product margins for olefins and commodity polyolefins and lower sales volumes, particularly for polypropylene. Results for PP compounds remained steady over the periods.

Ethylene Raw Materials— In Europe, heavy liquids are the primary raw materials for our ethylene production.

The following table shows the average West Europe benchmark prices for Brent crude oil for the applicable periods, as well as benchmark West Europe prices for ethylene and propylene, which we produce and consume internally or purchase from unrelated suppliers, and certain polyethylene and polypropylene products.

Average Benchmark Price and Percent Change
Versus Prior Year Period Average
Three months ended
March 31,
2012 2011 Change

Brent crude oil—dollars per barrel

118.31 105.65 12 %

Western Europe - €0.01 per pound

Weighted average cost of ethylene production

45.4 34.7 31 %

Ethylene

55.1 52.0 6 %

Polyethylene (high density)

65.1 62.1 5 %

Propylene

50.1 50.8 (1 )%

Polypropylene (homopolymer)

62.9 66.6 (6 )%

Average Exchange Rate—$US per €

1.31 1.37 (4 )%

The following table sets forth the O&P—EAI segment’s sales and other operating revenues, operating income, income from equity investments and selected product production and sales volumes.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues

$ 3,866 $ 3,944

Operating income

5 179

Income from equity investments

40 51

Production Volumes, in millions of pounds

Ethylene

947 997

Propylene

577 608

Sales Volumes, in millions of pounds

Polyethylene

1,316 1,305

Polypropylene

1,659 1,704

Revenues —Revenues decreased by $78 million, or 2%, in the first quarter 2012 compared to revenues in the first quarter 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales volumes and lower average product sales prices across all products other than PP compounds. Sales volumes were lower in the first quarter 2012 for all products except polyethylene and PP compounds, which were relatively unchanged from the 2011 period, when business conditions were stronger. Lower sales volumes and lower average sales prices were each responsible for revenue decreases of 1% in the first quarter 2012.

44


Table of Contents

Operating Income —Operating results for the O&P—EAI segment decreased by $174 million in the first quarter 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. First quarter 2012 operating results were lower across all businesses except for PP compounding and Catalloy, which were relatively unchanged from the first quarter 2011. Weak European olefins and polyolefins market conditions coupled with high crude oil prices resulted in lower margins in the first quarter 2012. These decreases were partially offset by higher product margins for PP compounds. Operating results also included a $22 million charge for impairment of assets related to damage to our LDPE plant in Wesseling, Germany resulting from an explosion in a reactor bay.

First Quarter 2012 versus Fourth Quarter 2011 —The O&P—EAI segment had operating income of $5 million in the first quarter 2012 and an operating loss of $55 million in the fourth quarter 2011, which was in the midst of an economic slowdown. Operating results improved in the first quarter primarily due to the effect of higher sales volumes and lower fixed and other costs. Sales volumes increased significantly over the depressed levels seen during the fourth quarter, returning to third quarter 2011 levels. Although operating results for European olefins and commodity polyolefins, polyethylene and polypropylene, improved compared to the fourth quarter, these businesses sustained losses during the first quarter as the benefit of price increases was reduced by higher raw material costs. Results for PP compounding and other specialty polyolefins remained steady during the 2012 period. First quarter operating results also included the $22 million asset impairment charge related to our Wesseling, Germany site.

Intermediates and Derivatives Segment

Overview— The Intermediates and Derivatives (“I&D”) segment results for the first quarter of 2012 were relatively unchanged compared to the first quarter 2011. Results for both the PO and derivatives and Intermediates businesses reflect continued steady performance over the periods.

The following table sets forth the I&D segment’s sales and other operating revenues, operating income, income from equity investments and selected product sales volumes.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues

$ 1,699 $ 1,692

Operating income

245 234

Income from equity investments

4

Sales Volumes, in millions of pounds

PO and derivatives

828 838

EO and derivatives

312 288

Styrene

704 852

Acetyls

489 439

TBA intermediates

462 485

Revenues —Revenues in the first quarter 2012 were comparable to those in the first quarter of 2011. Higher average sales prices resulted in a revenue increase of 1% in the first quarter 2012, which was offset by a comparable volume-based revenue decrease driven primarily by lower sale volumes for styrene and propylene glycol for deicing products. Planned maintenance at our Channelview, Texas plant negatively impacted both high purity isobutylene and styrene sales volumes in the U.S.

45


Table of Contents

Operating Income —Operating income for the I&D segment in the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 remained relatively unchanged. In the first quarter 2012, margins for BDO and TBA derivatives were higher largely as a result of stronger BDO demand and stronger fuels-based referenced pricing, respectively. The benefit from improved margins was substantially offset by a decrease in propylene glycol sales volumes used in deicing products and lower results for the EO/EG business. Results for the EO/EG business were negatively impacted by margin compression due to the increase in raw material costs.

First Quarter 2012 versus Fourth Quarter 2011 —The I&D segment had operating income of $245 million in the first quarter 2012 compared to $134 million in the fourth quarter 2011. Operating results for the first quarter 2012 reflected the effect of higher sales volumes across all businesses except for sales of propylene glycol into the aircraft deicing industry. The increase in volumes reflected additional production capability following the completion of turnarounds at two of our facilities in the fourth quarter. Demand for aircraft deicing products continued to be weak as unseasonably warm weather conditions persisted. Higher TBA and derivative margins also contributed to the increase in operating results as sales prices averaged higher as some product pricing is related to strong oxyfuels pricing and volumes benefited from the completion of the fourth quarter turnarounds. These benefits were partially offset by lower margins for styrene, which is primarily due to the higher cost of the raw material, benzene.

Refining and Oxyfuels Segment

Overview —Benchmark U.S. heavy crude refining margins were lower in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to a decrease in the differential between the cost of heavy and light crude oil. Unseasonably strong oxyfuels margins in the first quarter 2012 benefited from high global gasoline prices relative to natural gas based raw material costs compared to the first quarter of 2011. On January 4, 2012, operations were suspended at the Berre refinery in response to continuing poor market conditions in Europe, and the refinery was mothballed.

First quarter 2012 operating results primarily reflected the effect of lower crude oil refining margins and lower by-product spreads at the Houston refinery, partially offset by higher oxyfuels margins. Crude processing rates at the Houston refinery were comparable in the first quarters of 2012 and 2011. Segment results benefitted from the liquidation of product inventory following the suspension of operations at the Berre refinery in early January 2012.

The following table sets forth the Refining and Oxyfuels segment’s sales and other operating revenues, operating income and sales volumes for certain gasoline blending components for the applicable periods. In addition, the table shows market refining margins for the U.S. and Europe and MTBE margins in Northwest Europe (“NWE”). In the U.S., “LLS,” or Light Louisiana Sweet is a light crude oil, while “Maya” is a heavy crude oil.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues

$ 4,261 $ 4,720

Operating income

140 164

Sales Volumes, in millions

Gasoline blending components—MTBE/ETBE (gallons)

205 192

Crude processing rates (thousands of barrels per day)

Houston refining

259 258

Market margins—$ per barrel

Light crude oil—2-1-1

9.34 6.00

Light crude—Maya differential

10.81 17.87

Total Maya 2-1-1

20.15 23.87

Market margins—cents per gallon

MTBE—NWE

125.1 58.9

46


Table of Contents

Revenues —Revenues for the Refining and Oxyfuels segment decreased $459 million, or 10%, in the first quarter 2012 compared to the first quarter 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the suspension of operations at the Berre refinery on January 4, 2012, which was partially offset by higher revenues for the Houston refinery and oxyfuels business. The higher revenues at the Houston refinery were primarily due to higher average sales prices, while the higher oxyfuels revenues reflected both higher averages sales prices and higher sales volumes. The suspension of operations at the Berre refinery was responsible for a revenue decrease of 20%. For the remainder of the segment, revenue increases of 7% and 3% were the result of higher average sales prices and higher sales volumes, respectively.

Houston refinery crude processing rates were relatively unchanged in the first quarter 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. The crude processing rate for the Berre refinery, which ceased operations in early January 2012, was 101 thousand barrels per day in the first quarter 2011. Sales volumes for oxyfuels products were negatively impacted in the first quarter 2011 due to labor issues at a French manufacturing site.

Operating Income —Operating results for the first quarter 2012 decreased by $24 million compared to the first quarter 2011. The decrease in operating income primarily reflects lower refining margins at our Houston refinery as indicated by the decrease in the Maya 2-1-1 benchmark margin and a loss of upgrading value in the processing of certain products due to the turnaround at our Channelview, Texas site. Lower refining results were partially offset by higher first quarter 2012 operating results for our oxyfuels business. The higher oxyfuels results reflect the effect of tight supply due to competitor outages and higher margins primarily related to the price premium for MTBE and ETBE over gasoline coupled with an increased spread from gasoline for raw materials, methanol and ethanol. Operating results for the first quarter 2011 included a $34 million benefit related to an insurance recovery obtained due to the misconduct of a former employee. First quarter 2012 operating results reflect a $42 million benefit related to the liquidation of the Berre refinery’s product inventory following the suspension of operations.

First Quarter 2012 versus Fourth Quarter 2011 —The Refining and Oxyfuels segment had operating income of $140 million in the first quarter 2012 compared to an operating loss of $196 million in the fourth quarter 2011. Operating results for the fourth quarter 2011 included charges totaling $136 million primarily related to the suspension of operations at the Berre refinery, which were partially offset by a $15 million benefit from a settlement related to the 2008 crane collapse at the Houston refinery. Operating results for the first quarter 2012 include the $42 million benefit related to the liquidation of inventory at the Berre refinery. The improvement in the underlying operations of the refining and oxyfuels businesses during the first quarter 2012 reflects higher results for our oxyfuels business and higher refining margins at the Houston refinery. The improvement in oxyfuels results is primarily due to higher margins reflecting the price premium for MTBE and ETBE over the price of gasoline coupled with the lower price of ethanol. Refining margins at the Houston refinery reflect a significant improvement in the Maya 2-1-1 benchmark margins.

Crude processing rates at the Houston refinery were relatively unchanged in the first quarter 2012 compared to the fourth quarter 2011.

Technology Segment

Overview— Operating results for the Technology segment reflected lower licensing and services revenue, lower results for the catalyst business and higher research and development costs in the first quarter 2012 compared to the first quarter 2011.

The following table sets forth the Technology segment’s sales and other operating revenues and operating income.

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Sales and other operating revenues

$ 119 $ 139

Operating income

38 66

47


Table of Contents

Revenues —Revenues for the first quarter 2012 decreased by $20 million, or 14%, compared to the first quarter 2011. A decrease in the recognition of revenue on process licenses issued in prior periods was responsible for a revenue decrease of 11%. Higher catalyst sales volumes resulted in a revenue increase of 4%, offset by a 7% reduction in revenues due to lower prices which was mainly exchange-rate driven.

Operating Income —Operating income in the first quarter 2012 decreased by $28 million compared to the first quarter 2011. The decrease primarily reflected lower revenue recognized from process licenses issued in prior years.

First Quarter 2012 versus Fourth Quarter 2011— The Technology segment had operating income of $38 million in the first quarter 2012 compared to $11 million in the fourth quarter 2011. The increase in first quarter operating results was primarily due to improved results in our process technology licensing and catalyst businesses and lower R&D costs compared to the fourth quarter.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Operating, investing and financing activities of continuing operations, which are discussed below, are presented in the following table:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Source (use) of cash:

Operating activities

$ 921 $ 221

Investing activities

(185 ) (216 )

Financing activities

(148 ) 28

Operating Activities —Cash of $921 million provided in the first quarter 2012 primarily reflected an increase in earnings, $244 million of income tax refunds, and $52 million of cash provided by the main components of working capital – accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable, partially offset by certain payments related to sales rebates, employee bonuses and property taxes. The $221 million of cash provided in the first three months of 2011 primarily reflected an increase in earnings and higher distributions from our joint ventures, partially offset by an increase in cash used by the main components of working capital and company contributions to our pension plans.

The main components of working capital provided cash of $52 million in the first quarter of 2012 and used cash of $432 million in the first quarter of 2011. The increase in these working capital components during the first quarter of 2012 reflects an increase of $374 million in accounts receivable, which was more than offset by a $346 million decrease in inventories and an $80 million increase in accounts payable. The increase in accounts receivable primarily reflected higher first quarter 2012 sales volumes in our O&P-EAI and I&D segments. In late 2011, the level of sales volumes for the O&P-EAI and I&D segments was negatively affected by economic weakness and turnaround activities, respectively. The decrease in inventories reflects the liquidation of inventory at the Berre refinery following the suspension of operations in early January 2012 as well as a return to more normal inventory levels in the O&P-Americas segment following the build in inventory in late 2011 in preparation for a major first quarter 2012 turnaround. Rising naphtha and propylene prices in the O&P-EAI and I&D segments, respectively were the primary drivers of the increase in accounts payable.

The $432 million use of cash by the main components of working capital in the first quarter of 2011 was primarily attributable to a $799 million increase in inventory. The increase in inventory reflected the effects of higher average prices of crude oil in the first quarter 2011, compared to the fourth quarter 2010, a build in inventory as we prepared for maintenance activities and opportunistic purchases of discounted crude oil. A $1,264 million increase in accounts payable due to higher feedstock volumes and costs and the timing of payments more than offset an $897 million increase in accounts receivable that reflects the effect of higher average sales prices.

48


Table of Contents

Investing Activities —Cash used in investing activities of $185 million and $216 million in the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily reflects capital expenditures, partially offset in the first quarter 2012 by a $44 million decrease in restricted cash.

The following table summarizes capital expenditures for the periods presented:

Three Months Ended
March 31,

Millions of dollars

2012 2011

Capital expenditures by segment:

O&P—Americas

$ 102 $ 66

O&P—EAI

60 42

I&D

24 5

Refining and Oxyfuels

38 101

Technology

9 7

Other

1 1

Total capital expenditures by segment

234 222

Less:

Contributions to PO Joint Ventures

(6 ) (1 )

Consolidated capital expenditures of continuing operations

$ 228 $ 221

Financing Activities —Financing activities used cash of $148 million in the first quarter 2012 and provided $28 million in the first quarter 2011. In the first quarter 2012, we paid cash dividends of $143 million.

Proceeds of $37 million received upon conversion of warrants to ordinary shares in the first quarter 2011 were partially offset by $9 million related to bank overdraft activity.

Liquidity and Capital Resources —As of March 31, 2012, we had unrestricted cash of $1,670 million. In addition, we had total unused availability under our credit facilities of $2,431 million at March 31, 2012, which included the following:

$1,938 million under our $2,000 million U.S. ABL facility, which is subject to a borrowing base, net of outstanding borrowings and outstanding letters of credit provided under the facility. At March 31, 2012, we had $62 million of outstanding letters of credit and no outstanding borrowings under the facility.

€359 million and $19 million (totaling approximately $493 million) under our €450 million European receivables securitization facility. Availability under the European receivables securitization facility is subject to a borrowing base, net of outstanding borrowings. There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility at March 31, 2012.

On April 9, 2012, LyondellBasell Industries N.V. issued $2 billion aggregate principal amount of 5% senior notes due 2019 (the “2019 notes”) and $1 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.75% senior notes due 2024 (the “2024 notes” and, together with the 2019 notes, the “notes”), each at an issue price of 100%. The notes were issued in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers and to certain non-U.S. persons in offshore transactions. We paid fees totaling $38 million related to the issuance of these notes.

Net proceeds from the notes, together with cash on hand, were used to finance the repurchase of $742 million and $1,864 million, respectively, of Lyondell Chemical Company’s 8% senior notes due 2017 and 11% senior notes due 2018, pursuant to tender offers and to pay premiums and fees totaling $287 million related to the repurchase. We expect to repurchase the 8% senior notes due 2017 and 11% senior notes due 2018 that remain outstanding using cash on hand.

49


Table of Contents

On April 4, 2012, we entered into amendments to the indentures governing our remaining 8% senior notes and 11% senior notes to eliminate substantially all restrictive covenants.

We are also seeking to obtain a new unsecured revolving credit facility to refinance our existing $2,000 million U.S. ABL facility. We expect the new financing agreement to be finalized during the second quarter 2012.

We have receivables outstanding of €193 million ($258 million) related to value added tax (“VAT”) in Italy. In the first quarter 2010, Italy implemented a reverse change rule, under which non-domestic companies may not collect VAT on sales to domestic companies but must submit VAT on purchases from domestic companies. As a result, the balance of VAT receivables due from Italy has increased since that date. We fully expect to collect all amounts owed to us.

We recorded a charge of $136 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 primarily related to the then estimated cost of the social plan and as a result of inventory write-downs in connection with the suspension of operations at our Berre refinery in France. Final costs to be incurred are contingent on completion of the consultations. We expect to incur additional costs in connection with the cessation of operations but do not believe any such additional costs will be material to our results of operations.

In addition to the letters of credit issued under the U.S. ABL facility, we also have outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees totaling $100 million, including $9 million which are collateralized by cash. Such cash is included in the $9 million of Restricted cash reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012.

At March 31, 2012, we had total debt, including current maturities, of $4,026 million.

We may repay or redeem our debt, including purchases of our outstanding bonds in the open market, using cash on hand, cash from operating activities or proceeds from asset divestitures. We plan to finance our ongoing working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and other funding requirements with cash from operations, which could be affected by general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

We intend to declare and pay quarterly dividends, with the goal of increasing the dividend over time, after giving due consideration to our cash balances and expected results of operations. We believe that our cash, cash from operating activities and proceeds from our credit facilities provide us with sufficient financial resources to meet our anticipated capital requirements and obligations as they come due.

ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING CHANGES

For a discussion of the potential impact of new accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

50


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify our forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and similar expressions.

We based the forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates and projections about ourselves and the industries in which we operate in general. We caution you these statements are not guarantees of future performance as they involve assumptions that, while made in good faith, may prove to be incorrect, and involve risks and uncertainties we cannot predict. In addition, we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what we have expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements. Any differences could result from a variety of factors, including the following:

if we are unable to comply with the terms of our credit facilities and other financing arrangements, those obligations could be accelerated, which we may not be able to repay;

we may be unable to incur additional indebtedness or obtain financing on terms that we deem acceptable, including for refinancing of our current obligations; higher interest rates and costs of financing would increase our expenses;

our ability to implement business strategies may be negatively affected or restricted by, among other things, governmental regulations or policies;

the cost of raw materials represent a substantial portion of our operating expenses, and energy costs generally follow price trends of crude oil and natural gas; price volatility can significantly affect our results of operations and we may be unable to pass raw material and energy cost increases on to our customers;

industry production capacities and operating rates may lead to periods of oversupply and low profitability;

uncertainties associated with worldwide economies create increased counterparty risks, which could reduce liquidity or cause financial losses resulting from counterparty exposure;

the negative outcome of any legal, tax and environmental proceedings may increase our costs;

we may be required to reduce production or idle certain facilities because of the cyclical and volatile nature of the supply-demand balance in the chemical and refining industries, which would negatively affect our operating results;

we may face operating interruptions due to events beyond our control at any of our facilities, which would negatively impact our operating results, and because the Houston refinery is our only North American refining operation, we would not have the ability to increase production elsewhere to mitigate the impact of any outage at that facility;

regulations may negatively impact our business by, among other things, restricting our operations, increasing costs of operations or requiring significant capital expenditures;

we face significant competition due to the commodity nature of many of our products and may not be able to protect our market position or otherwise pass on cost increases to our customers;

we rely on continuing technological innovation, and an inability to protect our technology, or others’ technological developments could negatively impact our competitive position; and

51


Table of Contents

we are subject to the risks of doing business at a global level, including fluctuations in exchange rates, wars, terrorist activities, political and economic instability and disruptions and changes in governmental policies, which could cause increased expenses, decreased demand or prices for our products and/or disruptions in operations, all of which could reduce our operating results.

52


Table of Contents
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market and regulatory risks is described in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our exposure to such risks has not changed materially in the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of March 31, 2012, with the participation of our management, our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) carried out an evaluation, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively as of March 31, 2012.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act, in the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

53


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Environmental Matters

From time to time we and our joint ventures receive notices or inquiries from federal, state or local governmental entities regarding alleged violations of environmental laws and regulations pertaining to, among other things, the disposal, emission and storage of chemical and petroleum substances, including hazardous wastes. Item 103 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K requires disclosure of certain environmental matters when a governmental authority is a party to the proceedings and the proceedings involve potential monetary sanctions that we reasonably believe could exceed $100,000. In March 2012, the EPA notified our Houston refinery about allegedly invalid credits used by us in the renewable fuels program. In April 2012, the matter was resolved pursuant to a settlement with the EPA under which we will pay a penalty of $150,000.

Litigation and Other Matters

Information regarding our litigation and other legal proceedings can be found under the “Litigation and Other Matters” section of Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies , to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the quarter ended March 30, 2012, we issued 598,023 shares upon exercise of warrants. The warrants originally were issued on April 30, 2010, the date of our emergence from bankruptcy proceedings, with an original exercise price of $15.90 per share that was adjusted to $13.77 on November 25, 2011 pursuant to the terms of the warrant agreements as a result of our special dividend. Warrants for 552,824 shares were exercised pursuant to a “cashless exercise” procedure pursuant to which we withhold shares that would otherwise be issued in payment of the exercise price. As a result, we received no proceeds from these exercises. We received proceeds of approximately $622,000 for the exercises of the remaining 45,199 warrants, which was used for general corporate purposes.

The issuance of the warrants and the shares issued upon exercise of the warrants were exempt from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act and any other applicable laws pursuant to Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code, which generally exempts distributions of securities in connection with plans of reorganization.

None of the foregoing transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering.

54


Table of Contents
Item 6. EXHIBITS

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32 Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

55


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.
Date: April 30, 2012 /s/     Wendy M. Johnson
Wendy M. Johnson

Chief Accounting Officer and Controller

(Chief Accounting and Duly Authorized Officer)

56

TABLE OF CONTENTS