MDC 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2011 | Alphaminr

MDC 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2011

MDC HOLDINGS INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 1-8951

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 84-0622967

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

4350 South Monaco Street, Suite 500

Denver, Colorado

80237

(Zip code)

(Address of principal executive offices)

(303) 773-1100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer

x

Accelerated Filer

¨

Non-Accelerated Filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller Reporting Company

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ¨ No x

As of June 30, 2011, 47,530,000 shares of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. common stock were outstanding.


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

INDEX

Page
No.
Part I. Financial Information:
Item 1. Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 1
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 3
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements 4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 26
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 51
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 51
Part II. Other Information:
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 52
Item 1A. Risk Factors 53
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 54
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 54
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved) 54
Item 5. Other Information 55
Item 6. Exhibits 55
Signatures 56


Table of Contents
ITEM 1. Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

June 30,
2011
December 31,
2010

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 755,835 $ 572,225

Marketable securities

646,895 968,729

Restricted cash

604 420

Receivables

Home sales receivables

7,797 8,530

Income taxes receivable

- 2,048

Other receivables

8,661 9,432

Mortgage loans held-for-sale, net

39,200 65,114

Inventories, net

Housing completed or under construction

336,514 372,422

Land and land under development

524,234 415,237

Property and equipment, net

38,769 40,826

Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance of $252,209 and $231,379at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively

- -

Related party assets

7,393 7,393

Prepaid expenses and other assets, net

54,402 85,393

Total Assets

$ 2,420,304 $ 2,547,769

Liabilities

Accounts payable

$ 29,108 $ 35,018

Accrued liabilities

204,890 260,729

Income taxes payable

734 -

Related party liabilities

117 90

Mortgage repurchase facility

8,988 25,434

Senior notes, net

1,243,273 1,242,815

Total Liabilities

1,487,110 1,564,086

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding

- -

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 47,530,000 and 47,474,000 issued and outstanding, respectively, at June 30, 2011 and 47,198,000 and 47,142,000 issued and outstanding, respectively,at December 31, 2010

475 472

Additional paid-in-capital

839,964 820,237

Retained earnings

87,198 158,749

Accumulated other comprehensive income

6,216 4,884

Treasury stock, at cost; 56,000 shares at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

(659 ) (659 )

Total Stockholders’ Equity

933,194 983,683

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

$ 2,420,304 $ 2,547,769

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 1 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Revenue

Home sales revenue

$ 206,163 $ 311,276 $ 369,546 $ 452,219

Land sales revenue

2,565 5,699 2,769 5,714

Other revenue

6,957 9,355 13,117 15,475

Total Revenue

215,685 326,330 385,432 473,408

Costs and expenses

Home cost of sales

179,097 255,062 320,078 364,452

Land cost of sales

1,741 4,974 1,758 5,165

Asset impairments

9,119 - 9,398 -

Marketing expenses

9,897 11,475 19,730 18,535

Commission expenses

7,456 11,611 13,223 16,740

General and administrative expenses

36,237 44,588 72,989 84,791

Other operating expenses

2,447 529 897 1,020

Related party expenses

28 - 32 9

Total operating costs and expenses

246,022 328,239 438,105 490,712

Loss from operations

(30,337 ) (1,909 ) (52,673 ) (17,304 )

Other income (expense)

Interest income

7,872 7,541 15,198 11,969

Interest expense

(7,394 ) (9,436 ) (16,124 ) (19,810 )

Other

56 105 92 204

Loss before income taxes

(29,803 ) (3,699 ) (53,507 ) (24,941 )

Benefit from income taxes, net

1,823 15 5,648 384

Net loss

$ (27,980 ) $ (3,684 ) $ (47,859 ) $ (24,557 )

Loss per share

Basic

$ (0.60 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (1.03 ) $ (0.53 )

Diluted

$ (0.60 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (1.03 ) $ (0.53 )

Dividends declared per share

$ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.50 $ 0.50

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 2 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30,
2011 2010

Operating Activities

Net loss

$ (47,859 ) $ (24,557 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities

Asset impairments

9,398 -

Stock-based compensation expense

6,680 8,202

Amortization of deferred marketing costs

4,850 5,528

Depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets

3,217 2,573

Write-offs of land option deposits and pre-acquisition costs

2,907 873

Other non-cash (income) expenses

359 322

Net changes in assets and liabilities:

Restricted cash

(184 ) (237 )

Home sales and other receivables

1,504 (35,608 )

Income taxes receivable

17,431 144,503

Mortgage loans held-for-sale

25,914 (49,750 )

Housing completed or under construction

51,411 (122,647 )

Land and land under development

(107,890 ) (105,669 )

Prepaid expenses and other assets

(6,226 ) (14,629 )

Accounts payable

(5,910 ) 15,801

Accrued liabilities and related party liabilities

(24,859 ) (3,639 )

Net cash used in operating activities

(69,257 ) (178,934 )

Investing Activities

Purchase of marketable securities

(404,472 ) (722,159 )

Maturity of marketable securities

451,000 88,287

Sales of marketable securities

275,726 20,797

Purchase of property and equipment and other

(29,295 ) (5,072 )

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

292,959 (618,147 )

Financing Activities

Payment on mortgage repurchase facility

(47,115 ) (45,470 )

Advances on mortgage repurchase facility

30,669 81,660

Dividend payments

(23,692 ) (23,570 )

Proceeds from issuance of senior notes

- 242,288

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

46 53

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(40,092 ) 254,961

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

183,610 (542,120 )

Cash and cash equivalents

Beginning of period

572,225 1,234,252

End of period

$ 755,835 $ 692,132

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 3 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1.

Basis of Presentation

The Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. (“MDC” or the “Company,” which refers to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries) have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of MDC at June 30, 2011 and for all periods presented. These statements should be read in conjunction with MDC’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in MDC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 11, 2011.

The Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Refer to the economic conditions described under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and “Risk Factors Relating to our Business” in Item 1A of the Company’s December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents . For cash and cash equivalents, the fair value approximates carrying value.

Marketable Securities . The Company’s marketable securities consist of fixed rate and floating rate interest earning securities, primarily: (1) debt securities, which may include, among others, United States government and government agency debt and corporate debt; (2) holdings in mutual fund equity securities and (3) deposit securities, which may include, among others, certificates of deposit and time deposits. As of June 30, 2011 all of the Company’s marketable securities are treated as available-for-sale investments and, as such, the Company has recorded all of its marketable securities at fair value with changes in fair value being recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. As of December 31, 2010, the Company classified certain marketable securities as held-to-maturity as it had the intent and ability to hold its held-to-maturity investments to maturity at the time of their purchase. In July 2011, the Company sold $100 million of held-to-maturity marketable securities prior to their maturity and, as a result, the Company has re-classified debt securities which were previously accounted for as held-to-maturity as available-for-sale as of June 30, 2011.

The following table sets forth the Company’s amortized cost and fair values of marketable securities, all of which were re-classified from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale (in thousands). The fair values of the Company’s marketable securities are based upon Level 1 and Level 2 fair value inputs.

June 30, 2011 December 31, 2010
Amortized Cost Estimated Fair
Value
Amortized Cost Estimated Fair
Value

Debt securities - maturity less than 1 year

$ 67,755 $ 68,303 $ 469,318 $ 469,956

Debt securities - maturity 1 to 5 years

120,164 121,556 120,078 121,406

Total

$ 187,919 $ 189,859 $ 589,396 $ 591,362

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company’s other available-for-sale marketable securities (in thousands).

- 4 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30, 2011 December 31, 2010
Amortized Cost Estimated Fair
Value
Amortized Cost Estimated Fair
Value

Equity security

$ 165,064 $ 166,084 $ 103,189 $ 105,304

Debt securities

287,696 290,952 271,260 274,029

Total

$ 452,760 $ 457,036 $ 374,449 $ 379,333

Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale, Net. As of June 30, 2011, the primary components of the Company’s mortgage loans held-for-sale that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are: (1) mortgage loans held-for-sale under commitments to sell; and (2) mortgage loans held-for-sale not under commitments to sell. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $30.3 million and $56.9 million, respectively, of mortgage loans held-for-sale under commitments to sell for which fair value was based upon a Level 2 input being the quoted market prices for those mortgage loans. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $8.9 million and $8.2 million, respectively, of mortgage loans held-for-sale that were not under commitments to sell and, as such, their fair value was based upon Level 2 fair value inputs, primarily estimated market price received from an outside party.

Inventories. The Company records its homebuilding inventory (housing completed or under construction and land and land under development) at fair value only when the undiscounted future cash flow of a subdivision is less than its carrying value. The Company determines the estimated fair value of each subdivision either by: (1) calculating the present value of the estimated future cash flows at discount rates that are commensurate with the risk of the subdivision under evaluation; or (2) assessing what the market value of the land is in its current condition by considering the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than in a forced liquidation), and recent land purchase transactions that the Company believes are indicators of fair value. These estimates are dependent on specific market or sub-market conditions for each subdivision. Local market-specific conditions that may impact these estimates for a subdivision include, among other things: (1) forecasted base selling prices and home sales incentives; (2) estimated land development costs and home cost of construction; (3) the current sales pace for active subdivisions; (4) changes by management in the sales strategy of a given subdivision; and (5) the level of competition within a market or sub-market, including publicly available home sales prices and home sales incentives offered by our competitors. The estimated fair values of impaired subdivisions are based upon Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the Company’s inventory that was impaired at June 30, 2011 is as follows (in thousands).

Land and Land
Under Development
(Held-for-

Housing Completed

or Under
Construction (Held-

Total Fair Value of
Development) for-Development) Impaired Inventory

West

$ 8,084 $ 6,796 14,880

Mountain

1,202 3,702 4,904

East

- - -

Other Homebuilding

201 587 788

Consolidated

$ 9,487 $ 11,085 $ 20,572

Related Party Assets. The Company’s related party assets are debt security bonds that it acquired from a quasi-municipal corporation in the state of Colorado. The Company has estimated the fair value of the related party assets based upon discounted cash flows as the Company does not believe there is a readily available market for such assets. The estimated cash flows from the bonds are ultimately based upon the Company’s estimated cash flows associated with the building, selling and closing of homes in one of its Colorado subdivisions. The estimated fair values of these assets are based upon Level 3 cash flow inputs. Based upon this evaluation, the estimated fair value of the related party assets approximates its carrying value.

Mortgage Repurchase Facility. The Company’s Mortgage Repurchase Facility (as defined below) is at floating rates or at fixed rates that approximate current market rates and have relatively short-term maturities. The fair value approximates carrying value.

- 5 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Senior Notes. The following table states the estimated fair values of the Company’s senior notes (in thousands).

June 30, 2011 December 31, 2010
Recorded Amount Estimated Fair
Value
Recorded Amount Estimated Fair
Value

7% Senior Notes due 2012

$ 149,705 $ 162,000 $ 149,650 $ 160,493

5 1 / 2 % Senior Notes due 2013

349,810 374,500 349,748 362,198

5 3 / 8 % Medium Term Senior Notes due 2014

249,351 265,700 249,266 255,683

5 3 / 8 % Medium Term Senior Notes due 2015

249,839 259,050 249,821 251,450

5 3 / 8 % Senior Notes due 2020

244,568 244,525 244,330 244,400

Total

$ 1,243,273 $ 1,305,775 $ 1,242,815 $ 1,274,224

As further described in Note 16, in July 2011 the Company extinguished a combined $237.0 million of its senior notes due in 2012 and 2013. The estimated fair value of the 7% Senior Notes due 2012 and 5 1 / 2 % Senior Notes due 2013 is based upon Level 1 fair value inputs determined using the price the Company paid to acquire the senior notes. The estimated fair value of the remaining senior notes is based on Level 2 fair value inputs, including market prices of bonds in the homebuilding sector.

3.

Inventory Impairments

The Company’s held-for-development inventory is included as a component of housing completed or under construction and land and land under development in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company evaluates its held-for-development inventory for impairment at each quarter end. The Company did not have any impairments of its homebuilding inventory during the three and six months ended June 20, 2010. The following table sets forth, by reportable segment, the asset impairments recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2011

Land and Land Under Development (Held-for-Development)

West

$ 5,919 $ 5,919

Mountain

1,236 1,236

East

285 285

Other Homebuilding

- -

Subtotal

7,440 7,440

Housing Completed or Under Construction (Held-for-Development)

West

954 954

Mountain

239 239

East

- -

Other Homebuilding

- -

Subtotal

1,193 1,193

Other Assets

486 765

Consolidated Asset Impairments

$ 9,119 $ 9,398

The Company recorded $9.1 million and $9.4 million of asset impairments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 resulting from a decline in the market value of land and homes primarily in our California, Nevada and Utah markets.

- 6 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

4.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company utilizes certain derivative instruments in the normal course of business, which primarily include commitments to originate mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments or locked pipeline) and forward sales of mortgage-backed securities commitments, both of which typically are short-term in nature. Forward sales securities commitments and private investor sales commitments are utilized to hedge changes in fair value of mortgage loan inventory and commitments to originate mortgage loans. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $130.0 million in interest rate lock commitments and $94.5 million in forward sales of mortgage-backed securities.

The Company records its mortgage loans held-for-sale at fair value to achieve matching of the changes in the fair value of its derivative instruments with the changes in fair values of the loans it is hedging, without having to designate its derivatives as hedging instruments. For forward sales commitments, as well as commitments to originate mortgage loans that are still outstanding at the end of a reporting period, the Company records the fair value of the derivatives in other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with an offset to either prepaid and other assets or accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the nature of the change. The changes in fair value of the Company’s derivatives were not material during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

5.

Balance Sheet Components

The following table sets for information relating to prepaid expenses and other assets, net (in thousands).

June 30,
2011
December 31,
2010

Deferred marketing costs

$ 23,135 $ 22,736

Land option deposits

11,432 11,606

Goodwill

5,958 -

Deferred debt issue costs, net

4,552 5,021

Prepaid expenses

3,331 5,935

IRS deposit (See Note 13)

- 35,562

Other

5,994 4,533

Total

$ 54,402 $ 85,393

The following table sets forth information relating to accrued liabilities (in thousands).

June 30, December 31,
2011 2010

Accrued liabilities

Insurance reserves (see Note 9)

$ 52,310 $ 52,901

Warranty reserves (see Note 8)

31,200 34,704

Accrued executive deferred compensation

22,467 20,956

Accrued interest payable

17,807 17,822

Accrued compensation and related expenses

15,609 22,659

Legal accruals (see Note 11)

13,213 14,230

Liability for unrecognized tax benefits (see Note 13)

11,808 55,850

Land development and home construction accruals

11,043 12,450

Customer and escrow deposits

6,631 4,523

Mortgage loan loss reserves (see Note 11)

4,100 6,881

Other accrued liabilities

18,702 17,753

Total accrued liabilities

$ 204,890 $ 260,729

- 7 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

6.

Loss Per Share

A company that has participating security holders (for example, unvested restricted stock that has nonforfeitable dividend rights) is required to utilize the two-class method for purposes of calculating earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”). The two-class method is an allocation of earnings/(loss) between the holders of common stock and a company’s participating security holders. Under the two-class method, earnings/(loss) for the reporting period are allocated between common shareholders and other security holders, based on their respective rights to receive distributed earnings (i.e. dividends) and undistributed earnings (i.e. net income or loss). Currently, the Company has one class of security and has participating security holders consisting of shareholders of unvested restricted stock. The basic and diluted EPS calculations are shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts).

Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share

Net loss

$ (27,980 ) $ (3,684 ) $ (47,859 ) $ (24,557 )

Less: distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

(206 ) (135 ) (365 ) (259 )

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$ (28,186 ) $ (3,819 ) $ (48,224 ) $ (24,816 )

Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

46,719 46,617 46,717 46,615

Basic Loss Per Common Share

$ (0.60 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (1.03 ) $ (0.53 )

Dilutive Loss Per Common Share

$ (0.60 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (1.03 ) $ (0.53 )

Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents and is computed using the weighted-average number of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the reporting period. Common stock equivalents include stock options and unvested restricted stock. Diluted EPS for the three and six months ending June 30, 2011 and 2010 excluded common stock equivalents because the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, or would decrease the reported loss per share. Using the treasury stock method, the weighted-average common stock equivalents excluded from diluted EPS were 0.4 million shares during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

7.

Interest Activity

The Company capitalizes interest on its senior notes associated with its qualifying assets, which includes land and land under development that is actively being developed and homes under construction through the completion of construction. When construction of a home is complete, such home is no longer considered to be a qualifying asset and interest is no longer capitalized on that home. The Company expensed $7.4 million and $9.4 million of interest primarily associated with interest incurred on its senior notes during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $16.1 million and $19.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, that could not be capitalized.

Interest activity is shown below (in thousands).

- 8 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Total Interest Incurred

Corporate

$ 18,084 $ 18,158 $ 36,270 $ 35,089

Financial Services and Other

60 127 123 206

Total interest incurred

$ 18,144 $ 18,285 $ 36,393 $ 35,295

Total Interest Capitalized

Interest capitalized, beginning of period

$ 43,762 $ 31,773 $ 38,446 $ 28,339

Interest capitalized

10,750 8,849 20,269 15,485

Previously capitalized interest included in home cost of sales

(5,454 ) (8,202 ) (9,657 ) (11,404 )

Interest capitalized, end of period

$ 49,058 $ 32,420 $ 49,058 $ 32,420

8.

Warranty Reserves

The Company records expenses and warranty reserves for general and structural warranty claims, as well as reserves for known, unusual warranty-related expenditures. The establishment of warranty reserves is primarily based on an actuarial study that includes known facts and interpretations of circumstances, including, among other things, the Company’s trends in historical warranty payment levels and warranty payments for claims not considered to be normal and recurring. Warranty payments incurred for an individual house may differ from the related reserve established for the home at the time it was closed. The actual disbursements for warranty claims are evaluated in the aggregate to determine if an adjustment to the historical warranty reserve should be recorded.

The following table summarizes the warranty reserve activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Balance at beginning of period

$ 33,615 $ 54,054 $ 34,704 $ 59,022

Expense provisions

1,034 2,220 1,875 3,210

Cash payments

(1,617 ) (2,611 ) (3,116 ) (4,640 )

Adjustments

(1,832 ) (1,677 ) (2,263 ) (5,606 )

Balance at end of period

$ 31,200 $ 51,986 $ 31,200 $ 51,986

The favorable warranty adjustments that were recorded as a reduction to home cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were primarily the result of a continued favorable trend in the amount of warranty payments incurred on previously closed homes.

9.

Insurance Reserves

The Company records expenses and liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses for claims associated with: (1) insurance policies and re-insurance agreements issued by StarAmerican Insurance Ltd. (“StarAmerican”) and Allegiant Insurance Company, Inc., A Risk Retention Group (“Allegiant”); (2) self-insurance, including workers compensation; and (3) deductible amounts under the Company’s insurance policies. The establishment of the provisions for outstanding losses and loss adjustment expenses is based on actuarial studies that include known facts and interpretations of circumstances, including the Company’s experience with similar cases and historical trends involving claim payment patterns, pending levels of unpaid claims, product mix or concentration, claim severity, frequency patterns such as those caused by natural disasters, fires, or accidents, depending on the business conducted, and changing regulatory and legal environments.

- 9 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table summarizes the insurance reserve activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Balance at beginning of period

$ 52,031 $ 51,390 $ 52,901 $ 51,606

Expense provisions

587 1,231 1,067 1,814

Cash payments

(656 ) (4,309 ) (2,006 ) (5,108 )

Adjustments

348 - 348 -

Balance at end of period

$ 52,310 $ 48,312 $ 52,310 $ 48,312

10.

Information on Business Segments

The Company’s operating segments are defined as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and is reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. The Company has identified its chief operating decision-makers (“CODMs”) as two key executives—the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer.

The Company has identified each homebuilding subdivision as an operating segment as each homebuilding subdivision engages in business activities from which it earns revenue, primarily from the sale of single-family detached homes, generally to first-time and first-time move-up homebuyers. Subdivisions in the reportable segments noted below have been aggregated because they are similar in the following regards: (1) economic characteristics; (2) housing products; (3) class of homebuyer; (4) regulatory environments; and (5) methods used to construct and sell homes. The Company’s homebuilding reportable segments are as follows:

(1)

West (Arizona, California, Nevada and Washington)

(2)

Mountain (Colorado and Utah)

(3)

East (Delaware Valley, Maryland and Virginia)

(4)

Other Homebuilding (Florida and Illinois)

The Company’s Financial Services and Other reportable segment consists of the operations of the following operating segments: (1) HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation (“HomeAmerican”); (2) Allegiant; (3) StarAmerican; (4) American Home Insurance Agency, Inc.; and (5) American Home Title and Escrow Company. These operating segments have been aggregated into one reportable segment because they do not individually exceed 10 percent of: (1) consolidated revenue; (2) the greater of (A) the combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss or (B) the positive value of the combined reported loss of all operating segments that reported losses; or (3) consolidated assets. The Company’s Corporate reportable segment incurs general and administrative expenses that are not identifiable specifically to another operating segment, earns interest income on its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, and incurs interest expense on its senior notes.

The following table summarizes revenue for each of the Company’s six reportable segments (in thousands). Inter-company adjustments noted in the revenue table below relate to mortgage loan origination fees paid by the Company’s homebuilding subsidiaries to HomeAmerican on behalf of homebuyers.

- 10 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Homebuilding

West

$ 69,401 $ 123,193 $ 111,884 $ 180,330

Mountain

78,702 110,112 149,826 156,794

East

51,076 72,657 94,168 104,162

Other Homebuilding

10,949 16,757 20,808 25,793

Total Homebuilding

210,128 322,719 376,686 467,079

Financial Services and Other

6,731 9,143 12,434 14,764

Corporate

- - - -

Intercompany adjustments

(1,174 ) (5,532 ) (3,688 ) (8,435 )

Consolidated

$ 215,685 $ 326,330 $ 385,432 $ 473,408

The following table summarizes (loss) income before income taxes for each of the Company’s six reportable segments (in thousands). Inter-company supervisory fees (“Supervisory Fees”), which are included in (loss) income before income taxes for each reportable segment in the table below, are charged by the Company’s Corporate segment to the homebuilding segments and the Financial Services and Other segment. Supervisory Fees represent costs incurred by the Company’s Corporate segment associated with certain resources that support the Company’s other reportable segments. Transfers, if any, between operating segments are recorded at cost.

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Homebuilding

West

$ (11,837 ) $ 6,357 $ (16,397 ) $ 8,711

Mountain

(1,204 ) 4,962 (2,436 ) 6,132

East

(2,345 ) 1,455 (4,301 ) (64 )

Other Homebuilding

(916 ) 295 (1,692 ) (224 )

Total Homebuilding

(16,302 ) 13,069 (24,826 ) 14,555

Financial Services and Other

3,089 4,089 4,869 5,935

Corporate

(16,590 ) (20,857 ) (33,550 ) (45,431 )

Consolidated

$ (29,803 ) $ (3,699 ) $ (53,507 ) $ (24,941 )

The following table summarizes total assets for each of the Company’s six reportable segments (in thousands). Inter-company adjustments noted in the table below relate to loans from the Company’s Financial Services and Other segment to its Corporate segment. The assets in the Company’s Corporate segment primarily include cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.

- 11 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30,
2011
December 31,
2010

Homebuilding

West

$ 360,939 $ 300,652

Mountain

308,805 311,833

East

214,246 188,693

Other Homebuilding

37,146 40,554

Total Homebuilding

921,136 841,732

Financial Services and Other

112,113 135,286

Corporate

1,390,811 1,573,408

Intercompany adjustments

(3,756 ) (2,657 )

Consolidated

$ 2,420,304 $ 2,547,769

The following table summarizes depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets and amortization of deferred marketing costs for each of the Company’s six reportable segments (in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Homebuilding

West

$ 1,241 $ 2,211 $ 2,121 $ 3,285

Mountain

928 1,091 1,761 1,554

East

602 639 1,046 951

Other Homebuilding

189 237 399 398

Total Homebuilding

2,960 4,178 5,327 6,188

Financial Services and Other

157 170 330 339

Corporate

1,221 821 2,410 1,574

Consolidated

$ 4,338 $ 5,169 $ 8,067 $ 8,101

11.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company often is required to obtain bonds and letters of credit in support of its obligations for land development and subdivision improvements, homeowner association dues and start-up expenses, warranty work, contractor license fees and earnest money deposits. At June 30, 2011 the Company had issued and outstanding performance bonds and letters of credit totaling $74.4 million and $22.9 million, respectively, including $9.1 million in letters of credit issued by HomeAmerican. In the event any such bonds or letters of credit issued by third parties are called, MDC could be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the bond or letter of credit.

Mortgage Loan Loss Reserves. In the normal course of business, the Company establishes reserves for potential losses associated with HomeAmerican’s sale of mortgage loans to third-parties. These reserves are created to address repurchase and indemnity claims by third-party purchasers of the mortgage loans, which claims arise primarily out of allegations of homebuyer fraud at the time of origination of the loan. These reserves are based upon, among other matters: (1) pending claims received from third-party purchasers associated with previously sold mortgage loans; (2) a current assessment of the potential exposure associated with future claims of homebuyer fraud in mortgage loans originated in prior periods; and (3) historical loss experience. During 2011, HomeAmerican reached settlements associated with claims and potential claims to repurchase certain previously sold mortgage loans. Primarily as a result of these settlements, the Company increased its estimated mortgage loan loss reserve by $1.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company’s mortgage loan reserves are reflected as a component of accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the associated expenses are included as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

- 12 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table summarizes the mortgage loan loss reserve activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands).

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Balance at beginning of period

$ 7,636 $ 8,241 $ 6,881 $ 9,641

Expense provisions

- - - -

Cash payments

(3,871 ) (172 ) (4,078 ) (1,572 )

Adjustments

335 - 1,297 -

Balance at end of period

$ 4,100 $ 8,069 $ 4,100 $ 8,069

Legal Accruals. Litigation has been filed by homeowners in West Virginia against MDC, its subsidiary Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc. (“RAH West Virginia”) and various subcontractors alleging a failure to install functional passive radon mitigation systems in their homes. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages and medical monitoring costs for alleged negligent construction, failure to warn, breach of warranty or contract, breach of implied warranty of habitability, fraud, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress based upon alleged exposure to radon gas. The litigation includes the following actions:

Joy, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 08-C-204, Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Joy ”). This action was filed on May 16, 2008, by sixty-six plaintiffs from sixteen households. The Company and RAH West Virginia have answered and asserted cross-claims against the subcontractors for contractual and implied indemnity and contribution.

Bauer, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 08-C-431, Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Bauer ”). This action was filed on October 24, 2008, by eighty-six plaintiffs from twenty-one households. This action has been consolidated for discovery and pre-trial proceedings with the Joy action.

Saliba, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 08-C-447, Circuit Court, Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Saliba ”). This action was filed on November 7, 2008, by thirty-five plaintiffs from nine households. This action has been consolidated for discovery and pre-trial proceedings with the Joy action.

By orders dated November 4 and 18, 2009, the trial court struck the answers filed by the Company and RAH West Virginia and entered judgment by default in favor of the plaintiffs on liability, with damages to be determined in a subsequent jury trial. On December 7, 2009, the Company and RAH West Virginia filed with the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals a motion seeking to stay the proceedings and a petition for writ of prohibition to vacate the default judgment. On June 16, 2010, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals granted the Company and RAH West Virginia a writ of prohibition and vacated the trial court’s sanctions orders.

On July 29, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a renewed motion for sanctions based on substantially the same alleged misconduct. On January 14, 2011 the trial court again entered an order striking the answers filed by the Company and RAH West Virginia and imposing judgment by default upon them on the claims asserted in plaintiffs’ complaints (exclusive of the claim for punitive damages). As stated in the January 14, 2011 order, the cross-claims made by the Company and RAH West Virginia remain in effect.

On March 31, 2011 the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals declined to enter a writ of prohibition with respect to the trial court’s re-entry of its judgment of default stating that the issues presented are more properly presented on appeal after full development of the record in the lower court.

- 13 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Separately, additional claims have been filed by homeowners in West Virginia against the Company, RAH West Virginia and individual superintendants who had worked for RAH West Virginia. The new litigation consists of the following:

Thorin, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 10-C-154, Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Thorin ”). This litigation was filed on May 12, 2010, by forty plaintiffs from eleven households in Jefferson and Berkeley Counties. To date, this action has not been consolidated for any purposes with the prior three actions. The claims asserted and the relief sought in the Thorin case are substantially similar to the Joy, Bauer and Saliba cases.

MDC and RAH West Virginia believe that they have meritorious defenses to each of the lawsuits and intend to vigorously defend the actions.

Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Company is a defendant in claims primarily relating to construction defects, product liability and personal injury claims. These claims seek relief from the Company under various theories, including breach of implied and express warranty, negligence, strict liability, misrepresentation and violation of consumer protection statutes.

The Company has accrued for losses that may be incurred with respect to legal claims based upon information provided to it by its legal counsel, including counsels’ on-going evaluation of the merits of the claims and defenses. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, actual results could vary from those accruals. The Company had legal accruals of $13.2 million and $14.2 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

12.

Line of Credit and Total Debt Obligations

Mortgage Lending . HomeAmerican has a Master Repurchase Agreement (the “Mortgage Repurchase Facility”) with U.S. Bank National Association (“USBNA”), which may include other banks that become parties to the Mortgage Repurchase Facility (collectively with USBNA, the “Buyers”). The Mortgage Repurchase Facility has a maximum aggregate commitment of $70 million and includes an accordion feature that permits the maximum aggregate commitment to be increased to $150 million, subject to the availability of additional commitments. The Mortgage Repurchase Facility is accounted for as a debt financing arrangement. Accordingly, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, amounts advanced under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility, which were used to finance mortgage loan originations, have been reported as a liability in Mortgage Repurchase Facility in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $9.0 million and $25.4 million, respectively, of mortgage loans that it was obligated to repurchase under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility.

The Company’s senior notes are not secured and, while the senior note indentures contain some restrictions on secured debt and other transactions, they do not contain financial covenants. The Company’s senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis, jointly and severally, by most of its homebuilding segment subsidiaries.

The Company’s debt obligations at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

June 30,
2011
December 31,
2010

7% Senior Notes due 2012

$ 149,705 $ 149,650

5 1 / 2 % Senior Notes due 2013

349,810 349,748

5 3 / 8 % Medium-Term Senior Notes due 2014

249,351 249,266

5 3 / 8 % Medium-Term Senior Notes due 2015

249,839 249,821

5 3 / 8 % Senior Notes due 2020

244,568 244,330

Total Senior Notes, net

1,243,273 1,242,815

Mortgage repurchase facility

8,988 25,434

Total Debt

$ 1,252,261 $ 1,268,249

As further described in Note 16, in July 2011 the Company extinguished a combined $237.0 million of the senior notes due in 2012 and 2013.

- 14 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

13.

Income Taxes

The Company is required, at the end of each interim period, to estimate its annual effective tax rate for the fiscal year and use that rate to provide for income taxes for the current year-to-date reporting period. Due to the effects of the deferred tax valuation allowance and changes in unrecognized tax benefits, the Company’s effective tax rates in 2011 and 2010 are not meaningful as the income tax benefit is not directly correlated to the amount of pretax loss. The income tax benefits of $1.8 million and $5.6 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, resulted primarily from the Company’s 2011 second quarter settlement of various state income tax matters and the Company’s 2011 first quarter settlement with the IRS on the audit of its 2004 and 2005 federal income tax returns. The Company’s income tax benefits during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were not material to the Company’s results of operations.

The Company is required to recognize the financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more likely than not (defined as a likelihood of more than 50%), based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. Any difference between the income tax return position and the benefit recognized in the financial statements results in a liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $11.8 million and $55.9 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. This decrease resulted primarily from the Company’s settlement with the IRS on the audit of its 2004 and 2005 federal income tax returns and settlement of various state income tax matters.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The increase in the Company’s total deferred tax asset at June 30, 2011 (per the table below) resulted primarily from an increase in the Company’s net operating loss carry forwards.

A valuation allowance is recorded against a deferred tax asset if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had a full valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax assets. The Company’s future realization of its deferred tax assets ultimately depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income in the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax laws. The Company will continue analyzing, in subsequent reporting periods, the positive and negative evidence in determining the expected realization of its deferred tax assets.

The tax effects of significant temporary differences that give rise to the net deferred tax asset are as follows (in thousands).

- 15 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

June 30,
2011
December 31,
2010

Deferred tax assets

Federal net operating loss carryforward

$ 98,854 $ 73,189

State net operating loss carryforward

49,485 47,041

Asset impairment charges

38,307 46,118

Warranty, litigation and other reserves

24,641 27,635

Stock-based compensation expense

25,124 22,777

Alternative minimum tax and other tax credit carryforwards

10,296 10,296

Accrued liabilities

10,529 9,789

Inventory, additional costs capitalized for tax purposes

5,368 5,368

Property, equipment and other assets, net

1,761 1,773

Charitable contribution on carryforward

946 938

Deferred revenue

293 326

Total deferred tax assets

265,604 245,250

Valuation allowance

(252,209 ) (231,379 )

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

13,395 13,871

Deferred tax liabilities

Deferred revenue

5,731 6,401

Unrealized gain

2,393 1,880

Inventory, additional costs capitalized for financial statement purposes

580 604

Accrued liabilities

383 713

Other, net

4,308 4,273

Total deferred tax liabilities

13,395 13,871

Net deferred tax asset

$ - $ -

14.

Variable Interest Entities

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into lot option purchase contracts (“Option Contracts”), generally through a deposit of cash or letter of credit, for the right to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with predetermined terms. The use of such land option and other contracts generally allows the Company to reduce the risks associated with direct land ownership and development, reduces the Company’s capital and financial commitments, including interest and other carrying costs, and minimizes the amount of the Company’s land inventories on its consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s obligation with respect to Option Contracts generally is limited to forfeiture of the related cash deposits and/or letters of credit. At June 30, 2011, the Company had cash deposits and letters of credit of $10.5 million and $6.7 million, respectively, at risk associated with 2,957 lots under Option Contracts.

- 16 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

15.

Other Comprehensive Loss

Total other comprehensive loss includes net loss and unrealized holding gains or losses on the Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities. The following table sets forth the Company’s other comprehensive loss during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30,
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Net loss

$ (27,980 ) $ (3,684 ) $ (47,859 ) $ (24,557 )

Unrealized holding (loss) gain

(1,971 ) (2,448 ) 1,332 (1,294 )

Total other comprehensive loss

$ (29,951 ) $ (6,132 ) $ (46,527 ) $ (25,851 )

16.

Subsequent Events

In July 2011, the Company completed a debt tender offer purchasing $63.7 million of its 7% Senior Notes due 2012 and $173.3 million of its 5 1 / 2 % Senior Notes due 2013. The Company paid $256.7 million, including interest and fees, for the acquired notes and, as a result of the tender, the Company will record an $18.6 million charge associated with the extinguishment of debt during the 2011 third quarter.

In July 2011, the Company sold $100 million of marketable securities, which it previously accounted for as held-to-maturity securities, at a gain of $1.2 million.

17.

Supplemental Guarantor Information

The Company’s senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis, jointly and severally, by the following subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”), which are 100%-owned subsidiaries of the Company.

M.D.C. Land Corporation

RAH of Florida, Inc.

Richmond American Construction, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Arizona, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Colorado, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Delaware, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Florida, LP

Richmond American Homes of Illinois, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Nevada, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of New Jersey, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Utah, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Virginia, Inc.

Subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Company’s senior notes (collectively, the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”) primarily include:

American Home Insurance

American Home Title

HomeAmerican

StarAmerican

Allegiant

Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc.

Richmond American Homes of Washington, Inc.

The Company has determined that separate, full financial statements of the Guarantor Subsidiaries would not be material to investors and, accordingly, supplemental financial information for the Guarantor Subsidiaries is presented.

- 17 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Balance Sheet

June 30, 2011

(In thousands)

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 718,010 $ 3,022 $ 34,803 $ - $ 755,835

Marketable securities

615,892 - 31,003 - 646,895

Restricted cash

- 604 - - 604

Receivables

8,572 5,666 4,877 (2,657 ) 16,458

Mortgage loans held-for-sale, net

- - 39,200 - 39,200

Inventories, net

Housing completed or under construction

- 319,951 16,563 - 336,514

Land and land underdevelopment

- 514,634 9,600 - 524,234

Investment in subsidiaries

122,483 - - (122,483 ) -

Other assets, net

48,334 42,106 11,223 (1,099 ) 100,564

Total Assets

$ 1,513,291 $ 885,983 $ 147,269 $ (126,239 ) $ 2,420,304

Liabilities

Accounts payable and related party liabilities

$ 2,768 $ 26,106 $ 3,008 $ (2,657 ) $ 29,225

Accrued liabilities

85,099 56,992 64,632 (1,099 ) 205,624

Advances and notes payable to parent and subsidiaries

(751,043 ) 744,688 6,355 - -

Mortgage repurchase facility

- - 8,988 - 8,988

Senior notes, net

1,243,273 - - - 1,243,273

Total Liabilities

580,097 827,786 82,983 (3,756 ) 1,487,110

Stockholders’ Equity

933,194 58,197 64,286 (122,483 ) 933,194

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

$ 1,513,291 $ 885,983 $ 147,269 $ (126,239 ) $ 2,420,304

- 18 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Balance Sheet

December 31, 2010

(In thousands)

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 535,035 $ 4,287 $ 32,903 $ - $ 572,225

Marketable securities

938,471 - 30,258 - 968,729

Restricted cash

- 420 - - 420

Receivables

14,402 8,071 194 (2,657 ) 20,010

Mortgage loans held-for-sale, net

- - 65,114 - 65,114

Inventories, net

Housing completed or under construction

- 372,422 - - 372,422

Land and land underdevelopment

- 415,237 - - 415,237

Investment in subsidiaries

110,065 - - (110,065 ) -

Other assets, net

88,267 42,288 3,057 - 133,612

Total Assets

$ 1,686,240 $ 842,725 $ 131,526 $ (112,722 ) $ 2,547,769

Liabilities

Accounts payable and related party liabilities

$ 2,747 $ 34,553 $ 465 $ (2,657 ) $ 35,108

Accrued liabilities

130,960 65,622 64,147 - 260,729

Advances and notes payable to parent and subsidiaries

(673,965 ) 671,190 2,775 - -

Mortgage repurchase facility

- - 25,434 - 25,434

Senior notes, net

1,242,815 - - - 1,242,815

Total Liabilities

702,557 771,365 92,821 (2,657 ) 1,564,086

Stockholders’ Equity

983,683 71,360 38,705 (110,065 ) 983,683

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

$ 1,686,240 $ 842,725 $ 131,526 $ (112,722 ) $ 2,547,769

- 19 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

(In thousands)

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Revenue

Home sales revenue

$ - $ 193,554 $ 13,783 $ (1,174 ) $ 206,163

Land sales and other revenue

- 2,730 6,792 - 9,522

Equity in (loss) income of subsidiaries

(13,221 ) - - 13,221 -

Total revenue

(13,221 ) 196,284 20,575 12,047 215,685

Costs and Expenses

Home cost of sales

- 168,000 12,271 (1,174 ) 179,097

Asset impairments

- 9,119 - - 9,119

Marketing and commission expenses

- 16,487 866 - 17,353

General and administrative and other expenses

16,251 18,672 5,530 - 40,453

Total operating costs and expenses

16,251 212,278 18,667 (1,174 ) 246,022

(Loss) income from operations

(29,472 ) (15,994 ) 1,908 13,221 (30,337 )

Other (expense) income

(337 ) 41 830 - 534

(Loss) income before income taxes

(29,809 ) (15,953 ) 2,738 13,221 (29,803 )

Benefit from (provision for) income taxes

1,829 1,208 (1,214 ) - 1,823

Net (loss) income

$ (27,980 ) $ (14,745 ) $ 1,524 $ 13,221 $ (27,980 )

- 20 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

(In thousands)

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Revenue

Home sales revenue

$ - $ 316,809 $ - $ (5,533 ) $ 311,276

Land sales and other revenue

- 5,910 9,144 - 15,054

Equity in (loss) income of subsidiaries

15,307 - - (15,307 ) -

Total revenue

15,307 322,719 9,144 (20,840 ) 326,330

Costs and Expenses

Home cost of sales

- 260,614 (19 ) (5,533 ) 255,062

Asset impairments

- - - - -

Marketing and commission expenses

- 23,086 - - 23,086

General and administrative and other expenses

18,607 25,828 5,656 - 50,091

Total operating costs and expenses

18,607 309,528 5,637 (5,533 ) 328,239

(Loss) income from operations

(3,300 ) 13,191 3,507 (15,307 ) (1,909 )

Other (expense) income

(2,422 ) 28 604 - (1,790 )

(Loss) income before income taxes

(5,722 ) 13,219 4,111 (15,307 ) (3,699 )

Benefit from (provision for) income taxes

2,038 (245 ) (1,778 ) - 15

Net (loss) income

$ (3,684 ) $ 12,974 $ 2,333 $ (15,307 ) $ (3,684 )

- 21 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Statements of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

(In thousands)

Revenue

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Home sales revenue

$ - $ 359,451 $ 13,783 $ (3,688 ) $ 369,546

Land sales and other revenue

- 3,391 12,495 - 15,886

Equity in (loss) income of subsidiaries

(19,273 ) - - 19,273 -

Total revenue

(19,273 ) 362,842 26,278 15,585 385,432

Costs and Expenses

Home cost of sales

- 311,495 12,271 (3,688 ) 320,078

Asset impairments

- 9,398 - - 9,398

Marketing and commission expenses

- 32,087 866 - 32,953

General and administrative and other expenses

31,019 34,429 10,228 - 75,676

Total operating costs and expenses

31,019 387,409 23,365 (3,688 ) 438,105

(Loss) income from operations

(50,292 ) (24,567 ) 2,913 19,273 (52,673 )

Other (expense) income

(2,528 ) 83 1,611 - (834 )

(Loss) income before income taxes

(52,820 ) (24,484 ) 4,524 19,273 (53,507 )

Benefit from (provision for) income taxes

4,961 2,584 (1,897 ) - 5,648

Net (loss) income

$ (47,859 ) $ (21,900 ) $ 2,627 $ 19,273 $ (47,859 )

- 22 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Statements of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

(In thousands)

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Revenue

Home sales revenue

$ - $ 460,655 $ - $ (8,436 ) $ 452,219

Land sales and other revenue

- 6,424 14,765 - 21,189

Equity in (loss) income of subsidiaries

17,661 - - (17,661 ) -

Total revenue

17,661 467,079 14,765 (26,097 ) 473,408

Costs and Expenses

Home cost of sales

- 372,925 (37 ) (8,436 ) 364,452

Asset impairments

- - - - -

Marketing and commission expenses

- 35,275 - - 35,275

General and administrative and other expenses

36,789 44,451 9,745 - 90,985

Total operating costs and expenses

36,789 452,651 9,708 (8,436 ) 490,712

(Loss) income from operations

(19,128 ) 14,428 5,057 (17,661 ) (17,304 )

Other (expense) income

(8,630 ) 76 917 - (7,637 )

(Loss) income before income taxes

(27,758 ) 14,504 5,974 (17,661 ) (24,941 )

Benefit from (provision for) income taxes

3,201 (223 ) (2,594 ) - 384

Net (loss) income

$ (24,557 ) $ 14,281 $ 3,380 $ (17,661 ) $ (24,557 )

- 23 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

(In thousands)

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

$ (25,813 ) $ (83,489 ) $ 20,772 $ 19,273 $ (69,257 )

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

321,930 (11 ) (28,960 ) - 292,959

Financing activities

(Advances to) payments from subsidiaries

(89,496 ) 82,235 26,534 (19,273 ) -

Mortgage repurchase facility

- - (16,446 ) - (16,446 )

Dividend payments

(23,692 ) - - - (23,692 )

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

46 - - - 46

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(113,142 ) 82,235 10,088 (19,273 ) (40,092 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

182,975 (1,265 ) 1,900 - 183,610

Cash and cash equivalents

Beginning of period

535,035 4,287 32,903 - 572,225

End of period

$ 718,010 $ 3,022 $ 34,803 $ - $ 755,835

- 24 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Supplemental Condensed Combining Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

(In thousands)

MDC Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminating
Entries
Consolidated
MDC

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$ 71,574 $ (225,398 ) $ (7,449 ) $ (17,661 ) $ (178,934 )

Net cash used in investing activities

(588,283 ) (454 ) (29,410 ) - (618,147 )

Financing activities

(Advances to) payments from subsidiaries

(256,944 ) 228,079 11,204 17,661 -

Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net

242,288 - - - 242,288

Mortgage repurchase facility

- - 36,190 - 36,190

Dividend payments

(23,570 ) - - - (23,570 )

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

53 - - - 53

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(38,173 ) 228,079 47,394 17,661 254,961

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(554,882 ) 2,227 10,535 - (542,120 )

Cash and cash equivalents

Beginning of period

1,210,123 3,258 20,871 - 1,234,252

End of period

$ 655,241 $ 5,485 $ 31,406 $ - $ 692,132

- 25 -


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This item contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Item 1A: Risk Factors Relating to our Business” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

INTRODUCTION

M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware corporation. We refer to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. as the “Company,” “MDC,” “we” or “our” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and these designations include our subsidiaries unless we state otherwise. We have two primary operations, homebuilding and financial services. Our homebuilding operations consist of wholly-owned subsidiary companies that generally purchase finished lots for the construction and sale of single-family detached homes to first-time and first-time move-up homebuyers under the name “Richmond American Homes.” Our homebuilding operations are comprised of many homebuilding subdivisions that we consider to be our operating segments. Homebuilding subdivisions in a given market are aggregated into reportable segments as follows: (1) West (Arizona, California, Nevada and Washington); (2) Mountain (Colorado and Utah); (3) East (Maryland, which includes Maryland, Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey, and Virginia, which includes Virginia and West Virginia); and (4) Other Homebuilding (Florida and Illinois).

Our Financial Services and Other segment consists of HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation (“HomeAmerican”), which originates mortgage loans, primarily for our homebuyers, American Home Insurance Agency, Inc. (“American Home Insurance”), which offers third-party insurance products to our homebuyers, and American Home Title and Escrow Company (“American Home Title”), which provides title agency services to the Company and our homebuyers in Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada and Virginia. This segment also includes Allegiant Insurance Company, Inc., A Risk Retention Group (“Allegiant”), which provides insurance coverage primarily to our homebuilding subsidiaries and certain subcontractors for homes sold by our homebuilding subsidiaries and for work performed in completed subdivisions, and StarAmerican Insurance Ltd. (“StarAmerican”), a Hawaii corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of MDC which is a re-insurer of Allegiant claims.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

During the first six months of 2011, we continued to be faced with challenges in the homebuilding industry including: (1) high levels of existing home inventories; (2) significant competition for new home orders and acquisition of finished lots; (3) low consumer confidence; and (4) high unemployment levels. These conditions reflect a further extension of the housing market downturn and it is difficult to predict when and at what rate these negative conditions will improve, or when the homebuilding industry will experience a sustainable recovery. As a result of these difficult market conditions and without the benefit of a federal homebuyer tax credit (which required the sale of homes to be completed by April 30, 2010), we experienced a 9% reduction in net home orders during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the same period during 2010. However, despite the challenging 2011 homebuilding environment, we did experience a 5% increase in sold homes during the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared with the same period in 2010, primarily attributable to increased subdivisions and results from a sales promotion that took place during the 2011 second quarter. The difficulties in the homebuilding market during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 also contributed to a sharp reduction in our Home Gross Margins (as defined below) and $9.4 million of asset impairments during the first six months of 2011, which contributed to our reported loss before income taxes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 of $28.0 million and $47.9 million, respectively, compared with $3.7 million and $24.6 million during the same periods in 2010.

Our Home Gross Margins decreased to 13.1% and 13.4% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, from 18.1% and 19.4% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Contributing to the declines in Home Gross Margins was the impact of very competitive pricing for new home orders designed to generate sales velocity. During the first six months of 2010, we had increased our supply of unsold inventory under construction at the frame and foundation stage in anticipation of increased demand from the federal homebuyer tax credit. However, following expiration of the federal homebuyer tax credit, sales of new homes significantly deteriorated. Accordingly, and coupled with an increase in the Cancellation Rate (as defined

- 26 -


Table of Contents

below) during the 2010 fourth quarter, we ended the 2010 year with a significant number of unsold homes under construction. Therefore, during the first six months of 2011, we focused on selling and closing unsold homes under construction, which decreased to 496 units at June 30, 2011 from 944 units at December 31, 2010. Our Home Gross Margins were also negatively impacted by an increase in our land costs, as the market for acquiring finished residential lots remained very competitive despite the continuing overall weakness in the market for new homes.

On the expense side of our business, we incurred asset impairments of $9.4 million during the first six months of 2011, with $9.1 million coming during the 2011 second quarter. These asset impairments resulted from a decline in the market value of land and homes primarily in our California, Nevada and Utah markets. We saw a decrease of $5.7 million and $2.3 million in marketing and commission expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared with the same periods in 2010, generally attributable to closing fewer homes during the 2011 periods. Additionally, we experienced an $8.4 million and $11.8 million decrease in our general and administrative expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared with the same periods in 2010, primarily due to lower costs associated with legal-related matters and employee compensation related costs. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had net interest income of $0.5 million compared to net interest expense of $1.9 million during the same period in 2010. We had net interest expense of $0.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $7.8 million during the same period in 2010. The improvement during the 2011 periods primarily related to obtaining better returns on our marketable securities and capitalizing interest incurred to our inventory during the first six months of 2011 compared with the same period in 2010.

During the first six months of 2011 we focused on: (1) decreasing expenses, including general and administrative costs and interest costs; (2) market share expansion; and (3) new market entry. We added to our 2010 fourth quarter efforts to reduce general and administrative expenses by reducing our headcount by approximately 10% during the 2011 second quarter. On July 7, 2011, we completed a debt tender offer extinguishing $237.0 million of our senior notes. Also, we took steps designed to increase market share in existing markets through additional investments in our homebuilding operations. On April 28, 2011, we entered the Seattle/Tacoma market through the purchase of substantially all of the homebuilding assets of SDC Homes and certain affiliated entities. Assets acquired included approximately 280 owned lots in various stages of construction, in 11 communities. Based on our acquisition activity in 2011 we increased our active subdivision (as defined below) count to 176 at June 30, 2011, a 19% increase from December 31, 2010. We also have an additional 45 subdivisions that we expect will be active in the near term, partially offset by 30 currently active subdivisions that we expect to be inactive in the near term.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management evaluates such estimates and judgments on an on-going basis and makes adjustments as deemed necessary. Actual results could differ from these estimates if conditions are significantly different in the future. Additionally, using different estimates or assumptions in our critical accounting estimates and policies could have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. See “ Forward-Looking Statements ” below.

Our critical accounting estimates and policies have not changed from those reported in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Results of Operations

The following discussion compares results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 with the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

- 27 -


Table of Contents

Home Sales Revenue. Home sales revenue from a home closing includes the base sales price and any purchased options and upgrades and is reduced for any Sales Price Incentives (defined as discounts on the sales price of a home) or Mortgage Loan Origination Fees (defined as mortgage loan origination fees paid by Richmond American Homes to HomeAmerican) and interest rate buydowns by HomeAmerican in mortgage loan financing offered to our homebuyers. The combination of base sales price and any purchased options and upgrades, less any of the foregoing incentives, for each closed home constitutes the selling price of our closed homes.

Our home sales revenue can be impacted by changes in our home closing levels and changes in the average selling prices of closed homes. The combination of home sales incentives offered to prospective homebuyers may vary from subdivision-to-subdivision and from home-to-home, and may be revised during the home closing process based upon homebuyer preferences or upon changes in market conditions, such as changes in our competitors’ pricing.

The table below summarizes home sales revenue by reportable segment (dollars in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

West

$ 66,951 $ 117,752 $ (50,801 ) -43 %

Mountain

78,415 110,072 (31,657 ) -29 %

East

51,049 72,622 (21,573 ) -30 %

Other Homebuilding

10,922 16,362 (5,440 ) -33 %

Total Homebuilding

207,337 316,808 (109,471 ) -35 %

Intercompany

(1,174 ) (5,532 ) 4,358 79 %

Consolidated

$ 206,163 $ 311,276 $ (105,113 ) -34 %

Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

West

$ 109,344 $ 174,479 $ (65,135 ) -37 %

Mountain

149,163 156,671 (7,508 ) -5 %

East

93,959 104,108 (10,149 ) -10 %

Other Homebuilding

20,768 25,396 (4,628 ) -18 %

Total Homebuilding

373,234 460,654 (87,420 ) -19 %

Intercompany

(3,688 ) (8,435 ) 4,747 56 %

Consolidated

$ 369,546 $ 452,219 $ (82,673 ) -18 %

The decline in home sales revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2011 for our West segment was primarily driven by closing 291 fewer homes in the Arizona, California and Nevada markets of this segment as this resulted in home sales revenue decreasing by $56.5 million and $8.1 million associated with the decrease in the average selling prices of homes in the markets of this segment, primarily California. This was partially offset by the impact of closing 51 homes in our new Washington market, which generated $13.8 million of home sales revenue during the 2011 second quarter. In our Mountain segment, the impact of closing 129 fewer homes resulted in a $36.8 million reduction in home sales revenue. This was partially offset by a $29,000 increase in the average selling price of closed homes in the Colorado market.

The decline in home sales revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2011 for our East segment was primarily driven by closing 38 fewer homes in the Maryland market of this segment as this resulted in home sales revenue decreasing by $17.6 million and $5.9 million associated with the decrease in the average selling prices of homes in the markets of this segment. In our Other Homebuilding segment, the impact of closing 23 fewer homes resulted in a $5.5 million reduction in home sales revenue.

- 28 -


Table of Contents

The decline in home sales revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011 for our West segment was primarily driven by closing 352 fewer homes in the Arizona, California and Nevada markets of this segment as this resulted in home sales revenue decreasing by $68.2 million and $10.7 million associated with the decrease in the average selling prices of homes, primarily from the California market. This was partially offset by the impact of closing 51 homes in our new Washington market, which generated $13.8 million of home sales revenue. In our Mountain segment, the impact of closing 69 fewer homes resulted in an $18.7 million reduction in home sales revenue. This was partially offset by a $32,300 increase in the average selling price of closed homes in the Colorado market.

The decline in home sales revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011 for our East segment was primarily driven primarily by an $8.5 million decrease associated with the declines in the average selling prices of homes in the markets of this segment. In our Other Homebuilding segment, the impact of closing 21 fewer homes resulted in a $4.9 million reduction in home sales revenue.

Home Gross Margins. We define “Home Gross Margins” to mean home sales revenue less home cost of sales as a percent of home sales revenue.

The following table sets forth our Home Gross Margins by reportable segment.

Three Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 Change

Homebuilding

West

15.5 % 20.0 % -4.5 %

Mountain

12.9 % 15.6 % -2.7 %

East

10.4 % 16.9 % -6.5 %

Other Homebuilding

11.4 % 19.9 % -8.5 %

Consolidated

13.1 % 18.1 % -5.0 %

Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 Change

Homebuilding

West

16.7 % 22.1 % -5.4 %

Mountain

12.4 % 16.5 % -4.1 %

East

10.6 % 17.2 % -6.6 %

Other Homebuilding

13.5 % 21.4 % -7.9 %

Consolidated

13.4 % 19.4 % -6.0 %

Home Gross Margins can be impacted positively or negatively in a reporting period by adjustments to our warranty reserves. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we continued to experience lower warranty payments on previously closed homes. As a result of favorable warranty payment experience relative to our estimates at the time of home closing, we recorded adjustments to reduce our warranty reserve of $1.8 million and $2.3 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $1.7 million and $5.6 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.

The following table sets forth our Home Gross Margins excluding warranty adjustments and interest in home cost of sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

- 29 -


Table of Contents
Three Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 Change

West

16.7 % 21.8 % -5.1 %

Mountain

14.2 % 17.9 % -3.7 %

East

13.9 % 19.2 % -5.3 %

Other

11.7 % 20.8 % -9.1 %

Consolidated

14.9 % 20.2 % -5.3 %

Six Months
Ended June 30,
2011 2010 Change

West

18.3 % 22.6 % -4.3 %

Mountain

14.2 % 18.4 % -4.2 %

East

13.6 % 19.3 % -5.7 %

Other

14.2 % 21.1 % -6.9 %

Consolidated

15.4 % 20.7 % -5.3 %

Home Gross Margins, excluding warranty and interest, decreased on a consolidated basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to: (1) accepting new home orders with lower Home Gross Margins designed to generate sales velocity in order to reduce our excess supply of unsold homes under construction; and (2) an increase in our land costs as the demand for finished residential lots has been very competitive despite the continuing overall weakness in the market for new homes. During the first quarter of 2010, we had increased our supply of unsold inventory under construction at the frame and foundation stage in anticipation of increased demand from the federal homebuyer tax credit. However, following expiration of the federal homebuyer tax credit, sales of new homes significantly deteriorated. Accordingly, and coupled with an increase in the Cancellation Rate (as defined below) during the 2010 fourth quarter, we ended the 2010 year with a significant number of unsold homes under construction. As a result of our effort to reduce the number of unsold homes under construction, a higher percentage of our 2011 homes closed were homes under construction, compared with the same periods in 2010. Generally homes sold as a dirt start yield a higher Home Gross Margin than homes under construction.

Future Home Gross Margins may be impacted negatively by, among other things: (1) a weaker economic environment as well as homebuyers’ reluctance to purchase new homes based on concerns about employment conditions; (2) increases in the costs of finished lots; (3) continued and/or increases in home foreclosure levels; (4) on-going tightening of mortgage loan origination requirements; (5) increased competition and increases in the level of home order cancellations, which could affect our ability to maintain existing home prices and/or home sales incentive levels; (6) deterioration in the demand for new homes in our markets; (7) fluctuating energy costs, including oil and gasoline; (8) increases in the costs of subcontracted labor, finished lots, building materials, and other resources, to the extent that market conditions prevent the recovery of increased costs through higher selling prices; (9) increases in interest expense included in home cost of sales; (10) changes in our warranty payment experiences and/or increases in warranty expenses or litigation expenses associated with construction defect claims; and (11) other general risk factors. See “Forward-Looking Statements” above.

The following table sets forth by reportable segment a reconciliation of our home cost of sales, as reported, to home cost of sales excluding warranty adjustments and interest in home cost of sales, which is used in the calculation of Home Gross Margins, excluding warranty adjustments and interest in home cost of sales (dollars in thousands).

- 30 -


Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Home Sales
Revenue - As
reported
Home Cost of
Sales - As
reported
Warranty
Adjustments
Interest in
Cost of Sales
Home Cost of
Sales - Excluding
Warranty
Adjustments and
Interest
Home Gross
Margins -
Excluding
Warranty
Adjustments and
Interest

West

$ 66,951 $ 56,592 $ (1,015 ) $ 1,830 $ 55,777 16.7 %

Mountain

78,415 68,276 (919 ) 1,913 67,282 14.2 %

East

51,049 45,725 260 1,520 43,945 13.9 %

Other

10,922 9,678 (158 ) 191 9,645 11.7 %

Intercompany

(1,174 ) (1,174 ) (1,174 ) N/A

Consolidated

$ 206,163 $ 179,097 $ (1,832 ) $ 5,454 $ 175,475 14.9 %

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

West

$ 117,752 $ 94,218 $ (1,255 ) $ 3,387 $ 92,086 21.8 %

Mountain

110,072 92,926 119 2,492 90,315 17.9 %

East

72,622 60,339 (374 ) 2,004 58,709 19.2 %

Other

16,362 13,111 (167 ) 319 12,959 20.8 %

Intercompany

(5,532 ) (5,532 ) (5,532 ) N/A

Consolidated

$ 311,276 $ 255,062 $ (1,677 ) $ 8,202 $ 248,537 20.2 %

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Home Sales
Revenue - As
reported
Home Cost of
Sales - As
reported
Warranty
Adjustments
Interest in
Cost of Sales
Home Cost of
Sales -Excluding
Warranty
Adjustments and
Interest
Home Gross
Margins -
Excluding
Warranty
Adjustments and
Interest

West

$ 109,344 $ 91,113 $ (1,218 ) $ 3,000 $ 89,331 18.3 %

Mountain

149,163 130,652 (1,099 ) 3,726 128,025 14.2 %

East

93,959 84,036 243 2,590 81,203 13.6 %

Other

20,768 17,965 (189 ) 341 17,813 14.2 %

Intercompany

(3,688 ) (3,688 ) (3,688 ) N/A

Consolidated

$ 369,546 $ 320,078 $ (2,263 ) $ 9,657 $ 312,684 15.4 %

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

West

$ 174,479 $ 135,963 $ (3,827 ) $ 4,715 $ 135,075 22.6 %

Mountain

156,671 130,805 (681 ) 3,566 127,920 18.4 %

East

104,108 86,156 (570 ) 2,661 84,065 19.3 %

Other

25,396 19,963 (528 ) 462 20,029 21.1 %

Intercompany

(8,435 ) (8,435 ) (8,435 ) N/A

Consolidated

$ 452,219 $ 364,452 $ (5,606 ) $ 11,404 $ 358,654 20.7 %

Home Gross Margins excluding the impact of warranty adjustments and interest in home cost of sales is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that warranty adjustments and interest have on our Home Gross Margins.

- 31 -


Table of Contents

Land Sales Revenue. Land sales revenue was not material during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Land sales revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $5.7 million and related to the sale of 106 lots, primarily in our West segment.

Other Revenue . Gains on the sale of mortgage loans primarily represent revenue earned by HomeAmerican from the sale of HomeAmerican’s originated mortgage loans to third-parties. Insurance revenue primarily represents premiums collected by StarAmerican and Allegiant from our homebuilding subcontractors in connection with the construction of homes. Title and other revenue primarily consist of forfeitures of homebuyer deposits on home sales contracts and revenue associated with our American Home Title operations.

The table below sets forth the components of other revenue (dollars in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Gains on sales of mortgage loans

$ 4,292 $ 6,593 $ (2,301 ) -35 %

Insurance revenue

1,992 1,888 104 6 %

Title and other revenue

673 874 (201 ) -23 %

Total other revenue

$ 6,957 $ 9,355 $ (2,398 ) -26 %

Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Gains on sales of mortgage loans

$ 8,615 $ 10,603 $ (1,988 ) -19 %

Insurance revenue

2,980 3,177 (197 ) -6 %

Title and other revenue

1,522 1,695 (173 ) -10 %

Total other revenue

$ 13,117 $ 15,475 $ (2,358 ) -15 %

Gains on sales of mortgage loans decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to closing 426 and 395 fewer homes, respectively.

Home Cost of Sales. Home cost of sales primarily includes land acquisition, land development and related costs (both incurred and estimated to be incurred), specific construction costs of each home, warranty costs and finance and closing costs, including Closing Cost Incentives (defined as homebuyer closing costs assistance paid by Richmond American Homes to a third-party).

Our home cost of sales can be impacted primarily from changes in our home closing levels and changes in the cost of land acquisition, development, construction cost of homes and changes in our estimated costs for warranty repairs.

The table below sets forth the home cost of sales by reportable segment (dollars in thousands).

- 32 -


Table of Contents
Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 56,592 $ 94,218 $ (37,626 ) -40 %

Mountain

68,276 92,926 (24,650 ) -27 %

East

45,725 60,339 (14,614 ) -24 %

Other Homebuilding

9,678 13,111 (3,433 ) -26 %

Total Homebuilding

180,271 260,594 (80,323 ) -31 %

Intercompany adjustments

(1,174 ) (5,532 ) 4,358 79 %

Consolidated

$ 179,097 $ 255,062 $ (75,965 ) -30 %

Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 91,113 $ 135,963 $ (44,850 ) -33 %

Mountain

130,652 130,805 (153 ) 0 %

East

84,036 86,156 (2,120 ) -2 %

Other Homebuilding

17,965 19,963 (1,998 ) -10 %

Total Homebuilding

323,766 372,887 (49,121 ) -13 %

Intercompany adjustments

(3,688 ) (8,435 ) 4,747 56 %

Consolidated

$ 320,078 $ 364,452 $ (44,374 ) -12 %

Home cost of sales in the West segment decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily resulting from closing 240 and 301 fewer homes, respectively. The decrease associated with the decline in closings was partially offset by an increase to home cost of sales in our new Washington market of this segment.

In the Mountain segment home cost of sales decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to closing 129 fewer homes. This was partially offset by an increase in the cost per closed home within this segment associated with a change in the mix of closed homes. Home cost of sales during the six months ended June 30, 2011 remained relatively flat as the decrease associated with closing 69 fewer homes during the first six months of 2011 was offset by increases in the cost per closed home.

In our East and Other Homebuilding segments, home cost of sales decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily resulting from closing fewer homes during the 2011 periods.

Land Cost of Sales . Land cost of sales was not material during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Land cost of sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $5.0 million and $5.2 million, respectively, and related to the sale of 106 lots, primarily in our West segment.

Asset Impairments. We recorded $9.1 million and $9.4 million of asset impairments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 resulting from a decline in the market value of land and homes primarily in our California, Nevada and Utah markets.

Marketing Expenses. Marketing expenses primarily include advertising, amortization of deferred marketing costs, model home expenses, compensation related expenses and other selling costs. The following table summarizes our marketing expenses by reportable segment (in thousands).

- 33 -


Table of Contents
Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 4,345 $ 5,179 $ (834 ) -16 %

Mountain

3,094 3,467 (373 ) -11 %

East

1,859 2,030 (171 ) -8 %

Other Homebuilding

599 799 (200 ) -25 %

Consolidated

$ 9,897 $ 11,475 $ (1,578 ) -14 %

Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 8,525 $ 8,248 $ 277 3 %

Mountain

6,290 5,646 644 11 %

East

3,449 3,294 155 5 %

Other Homebuilding

1,466 1,347 119 9 %

Consolidated

$ 19,730 $ 18,535 $ 1,195 6 %

Marketing expenses decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2011 in each of our homebuilding segments primarily resulting from a reduction of $1.2 million in amortization of deferred marketing costs associated with closing fewer homes in each segment and a $0.5 million decrease in product advertising expenses.

Marketing expenses increased for each of our homebuilding segments during the six months ended June 30, 2011 despite a 9% decline in net orders for homes during the period. Contributing to these increased costs was the impact of an increase in total subdivisions. As a result of this increase in marketing activity, we experienced increases of $0.8 million in sales office/showroom expense, $0.7 million in product advertising and $0.3 million in employee compensation and other employee-related benefit costs. These items were partially offset by a decrease of $0.7 million in amortization of deferred marketing costs primarily resulting from closing 395 fewer homes.

Commission Expenses . Commission expenses include direct incremental commissions paid for closed homes. The following table summarizes our commission expenses by reportable segment (in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 2,463 $ 4,526 $ (2,063 ) -46 %

Mountain

2,702 3,901 (1,199 ) -31 %

East

1,793 2,420 (627 ) -26 %

Other Homebuilding

498 764 (266 ) -35 %

Consolidated

$ 7,456 $ 11,611 $ (4,155 ) -36 %

- 34 -


Table of Contents
Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 3,947 $ 6,665 $ (2,718 ) -41 %

Mountain

5,175 5,473 (298 ) -5 %

East

3,147 3,525 (378 ) -11 %

Other Homebuilding

954 1,077 (123 ) -11 %

Consolidated

$ 13,223 $ 16,740 $ (3,517 ) -21 %

Commission expense decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 for each of our homebuilding segments due to closing 426 and 395 fewer homes, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses. The following table summarizes our general and administrative expenses by reportable segment (in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 7,702 $ 7,980 $ (278 ) -3 %

Mountain

3,762 4,748 (986 ) -21 %

East

3,386 6,402 (3,016 ) -47 %

Other Homebuilding

972 1,359 (387 ) -28 %

Total Homebuilding

15,822 20,489 (4,667 ) -23 %

Financial Services and Other

4,432 5,658 (1,226 ) -22 %

Corporate

15,983 18,441 (2,458 ) -13 %

Consolidated

$ 36,237 $ 44,588 $ (8,351 ) -19 %

Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ 13,820 $ 15,320 $ (1,500 ) -10 %

Mountain

8,008 8,472 (464 ) -5 %

East

6,988 11,238 (4,250 ) -38 %

Other Homebuilding

1,965 3,185 (1,220 ) -38 %

Total Homebuilding

30,781 38,215 (7,434 ) -19 %

Financial Services and Other

9,131 9,746 (615 ) -6 %

Corporate

33,077 36,830 (3,753 ) -10 %

Consolidated

$ 72,989 $ 84,791 $ (11,802 ) -14 %

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

Our consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased $8.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our salary related costs decreased by $5.0 million driven in part by the headcount reductions during the 2011 second quarter and 2010 fourth quarter and stock-based compensation expense as certain stock options became fully vested during the 2010 fourth quarter.

- 35 -


Table of Contents

Also contributing to this decline was the impact of expenses incurred on legal related matters during the 2011 second quarter, which were $1.6 million lower than during the 2010 second quarter. We experienced a $1.2 million decline in expenses associated with homeowner association dues as well during the 2011 second quarter. Insurance expenses declined by $0.6 million driven in part by a 38% reduction in homes closed during the 2011 second quarter. Additionally, office-related expenses decreased by $0.6 million driven in part by lower rent expense and efforts to limit general office expenses. These declines in general and administrative expenses were slightly offset by $1.2 million in severance expense incurred as a result of headcount reductions during the quarter.

In our West segment, general and administrative expenses decreased by $0.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily related to the reduction in homeowner association dues. In our Mountain segment, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 driven primarily by homeowner association dues and employee compensation related costs.

In our East segment, general and administrative expenses were $3.0 million lower during the three months ended June 30, 2011 due to lower fees incurred associated with legal-related matters.

In our Financial Services and Other segment, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily relating to declines of $0.7 million in salary related costs and $0.6 million in insurance expenses. In our Corporate segment, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily driven by our salary related costs partially offset by an increase in severance expense.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Our consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased by $11.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our salary related costs decreased by $6.8 million driven in part from the headcount reductions during 2011 second quarter and 2010 fourth quarter and stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options, which became fully vested during the 2010 fourth quarter. Also contributing to this decline was the impact of expenses incurred on legal related matters during 2011, which were $4.2 million lower than during 2010. We had a $1.7 million decline in expenses associated with homeowner association dues as well during 2011. Insurance expenses declined by $0.8 million driven in part by a 24% reduction in homes closed during 2011. Additionally, office-related expenses decreased by $1.1 million driven in part by lower rent expense and efforts to limit general office expenses. These declines in general and administrative expenses were slightly offset by a $1.3 million increase in mortgage loan loss reserves and a $1.4 million increase in severance expense incurred as a result of headcount reductions during the first six months of 2011.

In our West and Mountain segments, general and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to a decline in homeowner association dues and salary-related costs. The decline in our East segment was primarily due to lower legal-related expenses. In our Other Homebuilding segment the decline in general and administrative expenses were primarily driven by a decline in consulting expenses.

In our Financial Services and Other segment, general and administrative expenses were down primarily due to a $0.8 million reduction in employee compensation and other employee-related benefit costs and a $0.7 million decrease in insurance expense associated with closing fewer homes. These items partially were offset by a $1.3 million increase in our mortgage loan loss reserve. During the six months ending June 30, 2011 general and administrative expenses in our Corporate segment decreased by $3.8 million, primarily resulting from a $3.3 million decline in employee compensation and other employee-related benefit costs and a $0.6 million decrease in office-related expenses.

Other Operating Expense . Other operating expenses increased by $1.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to $2.1 million in write-offs of land option deposits and pre-acquisition costs associated with lot option contracts that we elected not to exercise. Other operating expenses decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as we incurred $2.9 million write-offs of land option deposits and pre-acquisition costs and $0.6 million in due diligence costs associated with our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of SDC and related entities partially offset by the release of a $2.7 million employment tax contingency reserve as a result of the finalization of an IRS examination.

- 36 -


Table of Contents

Other Income (Expense) . Other income (expense) primarily includes interest and dividend income on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, interest expense primarily on our senior notes, and gain or loss on the sale of other assets. Interest income was $7.9 million and $15.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared with $7.5 million and $12.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. These increases are attributable to an increase in our available-for-sale marketable securities during the 2011 periods compared with the 2010 periods. Our available-for-sale marketable securities include certain debt securities, primarily corporate debt and holdings in equity securities mutual funds. We increased our holdings of these marketable securities during 2011, primarily due to our efforts to achieve an appropriate rate of return.

Interest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $2.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively. We capitalize interest on our senior notes associated with our qualifying assets. We have determined that inventory is a qualifying asset during the period of active development of our land and through the completion of construction of a home. When construction of a home is complete, the home is no longer considered to be a qualifying asset and interest is no longer capitalized on that home. As a result of the increase in our inventory levels from the first six months of 2010, we capitalized $10.8 million and $20.3 million of interest incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, an increase of $1.9 million and $4.8 million from the same periods during 2010, respectively.

(Loss)/Income Before Income Taxes . The table below summarizes our (loss)/income before income taxes by reportable segment (dollars in thousands).

Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ (11,837 ) $ 6,357 $ (18,194 ) 286 %

Mountain

(1,204 ) 4,962 (6,166 ) 124 %

East

(2,345 ) 1,455 (3,800 ) 261 %

Other Homebuilding

(916 ) 295 (1,211 ) 411 %

Total Homebuilding

(16,302 ) 13,069 (29,371 ) 225 %

Financial Services and Other

3,089 4,089 (1,000 ) -24 %

Corporate

(16,590 ) (20,857 ) 4,267 20 %

Consolidated

$ (29,803 ) $ (3,699 ) $ (26,104 ) -706 %

Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Homebuilding

West

$ (16,397 ) $ 8,711 $ (25,108 ) 288 %

Mountain

(2,436 ) 6,132 (8,568 ) 140 %

East

(4,301 ) (64 ) (4,237 ) -6620 %

Other Homebuilding

(1,692 ) (224 ) (1,468 ) -655 %

Total Homebuilding

(24,826 ) 14,555 (39,381 ) 271 %

Financial Services and Other

4,869 5,935 (1,066 ) -18 %

Corporate

(33,550 ) (45,431 ) 11,881 26 %

Consolidated

$ (53,507 ) $ (24,941 ) $ (28,566 ) -115 %

- 37 -


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

In our West segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $11.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with income before income taxes of $6.4 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from $6.9 million of inventory impairments, a 450 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins and closing 291 fewer homes in the Arizona, California and Nevada markets of this segment. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $3.2 million in marketing, commission and general and administrative expenses. In our Mountain segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $1.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with income before income taxes of $5.0 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from $1.5 million of inventory impairments, a 270 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins and closing 129 fewer homes in this segment. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $2.6 million in marketing, commission and general and administrative expenses.

In our East segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $2.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with income before income taxes of $1.5 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from a 650 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins, closing 34 fewer homes in this segment and $0.3 million of inventory impairments. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $3.8 million in marketing, commission and general and administrative expenses. In our Other Homebuilding segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $0.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with income before income taxes of $0.3 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from an 850 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins and closing 23 fewer homes in this segment. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $0.9 million in marketing, commission and general and administrative expenses.

In our Financial Services and Other segment, income before income taxes decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to a $2.3 million decline in gain on sale of mortgage loans, partially offset by a $1.2 million reduction in general and administrative expenses. In our Corporate segment, loss before income taxes came down from $20.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $16.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011. This improvement primarily resulted from a $2.5 million decline in general and administrative expenses and a decrease of $2.0 million in interest expense.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

In our West segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $16.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with income before income taxes of $8.7 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from $6.9 million of inventory impairments, a 540 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins and closing 352 fewer homes in the Arizona, California and Nevada markets of this segment. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $4.2 million in commission and general and administrative expenses. In our Mountain segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $2.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with income before income taxes of $6.1 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from $1.5 million of inventory impairments, a 410 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins and closing 69 fewer homes in this segment and a $0.6 million increase in marketing expenses. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $0.8 million in commission and general and administrative expenses.

In our East segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $4.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with $0.1 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from a 660 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins and $0.3 million of inventory impairments. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $4.6 million in commission and general and administrative expenses. In our Other Homebuilding segment, we had a loss before income taxes of $1.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with $0.2 million during the same period in 2010. This decline primarily resulted from an 790 basis point decline in Home Gross Margins and closing 21 fewer homes in this segment. These items were partially offset by a combined decrease of $1.3 million in commission and general and administrative expenses.

In our Financial Services and Other segment, income before income taxes decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to a $2.0 million decline in gain on sale of mortgage loans, partially offset by a $0.6 million reduction in general and administrative expenses and a $0.6 million increase in interest income. In our Corporate segment, loss before income taxes came down from $45.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $33.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. This improvement primarily resulted from a $3.8 million decline in general and administrative expenses and a decrease of $3.6 million in interest expense partially offset by a $2.5 million decrease in interest income.

- 38 -


Table of Contents

Income Taxes . We are required, at the end of each interim period, to estimate our annual effective tax rate for the fiscal year and use that rate to provide for income taxes for the current year-to-date reporting period. Due to the effects of the deferred tax valuation allowance and changes in unrecognized tax benefits, our effective tax rates in 2011 and 2010 are not meaningful as the income tax benefit is not directly correlated to the amount of pretax loss. The income tax benefits of $1.8 million and $5.6 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, resulted primarily from our 2011 second quarter settlement of various state income tax matters and our 2011 first quarter settlement with the IRS on its audit of the 2004 and 2005 federal income tax returns. Our income tax benefits during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were not material to our results of operations.

Homebuilding Operating Activities

Orders for Homes, net . The table below sets forth information relating to orders for homes (dollars in thousands).

Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Change Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount % 2011 2010 Amount %

Orders For Homes, net (units)

Arizona

164 184 (20 ) -11 % 286 352 (66 ) -19 %

California

117 109 8 7 % 194 135 59 44 %

Nevada

154 195 (41 ) -21 % 242 365 (123 ) -34 %

Washington

26 26 N/M 26 26 N/M

West

461 488 (27 ) -6 % 748 852 (104 ) -12 %

Colorado

232 232 0 % 413 502 (89 ) -18 %

Utah

109 110 (1 ) -1 % 176 235 (59 ) -25 %

Mountain

341 342 (1 ) 0 % 589 737 (148 ) -20 %

Maryland

74 62 12 19 % 120 109 11 10 %

Virginia

95 76 19 25 % 163 142 21 15 %

East

169 138 31 22 % 283 251 32 13 %

Florida

91 47 44 94 % 142 106 36 34 %

Illinois

2 2 N/M 7 7 N/M

Other Homebuilding

93 47 46 98 % 149 106 43 41 %

Total

1,064 1,015 49 5 % 1,769 1,946 (177 ) -9 %

Estimated Value of Orders for Homes, net

$ 302,000 $ 281,000 $ 21,000 7 % $ 507,000 $ 539,000 $ (32,000 ) -6 %

Estimated Average Selling Price of Orders for Homes, net

$ 283.8 $ 276.8 $ 7.0 3 % $ 286.6 $ 277.0 $ 9.6 3 %

N/M – Not meaningful

Contributing to the increase in our net orders for homes during the three months ended June 30, 2011 were: (1) a 31% increase in our active subdivisions at June 30, 2011 compared with June 30, 2010; (2) the impact from a Company-wide sales promotion which took place during the 2011 second quarter; and (3) 26 homes being sold in our new Washington market. These items partially were offset as our net orders for homes in the 2011 second quarter, compared with the 2010 second quarter, were negatively impacted through the expiration of the federal homebuyer tax credit, which required the sale of a home to be completed by April 30, 2010.

- 39 -


Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our net orders for homes decreased, which was driven by a 148 unit decline in the markets of our Mountain segment and 189 unit decline in the Arizona and Nevada markets of our West segment. The decline in these markets was driven primarily from the impact of the expiration of the federal homebuyer tax credit. In certain markets, we did see some increases in net orders for homes, which were primarily the result of higher active subdivision counts.

Homes Closed. The following table sets forth homes closed for each market within our homebuilding segments (in units).

Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Change Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount % 2011 2010 Amount %

Arizona

98 242 (144 ) -60 % 175 350 (175 ) -50 %

California

62 68 (6 ) -9 % 110 114 (4 ) -4 %

Nevada

80 221 (141 ) -64 % 146 319 (173 ) -54 %

Washington

51 51 N/M 51 51 N/M

West

291 531 (240 ) -45 % 482 783 (301 ) -38 %

Colorado

182 230 (48 ) -21 % 348 338 10 3 %

Utah

66 147 (81 ) -55 % 120 199 (79 ) -40 %

Mountain

248 377 (129 ) -34 % 468 537 (69 ) -13 %

Maryland

49 87 (38 ) -44 % 106 117 (11 ) -9 %

Virginia

72 68 4 6 % 115 108 7 6 %

East

121 155 (34 ) -22 % 221 225 (4 ) -2 %

Florida

48 72 (24 ) -33 % 91 113 (22 ) -19 %

Illinois

1 1 0 % 1 1 0 %

Other Homebuilding

49 72 (23 ) -32 % 92 113 (21 ) -19 %

Total

709 1,135 (426 ) -38 % 1,263 1,658 (395 ) -24 %

Homes closed during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were down in each of our homebuilding segments. Contributing to the decline in home closings was the negative impact from the federal homebuyer tax credit, which expired during 2010.

Backlog . The following table below sets forth information relating to Backlog for each market within our homebuilding segments (dollars in thousands).

- 40 -


Table of Contents
June 30, December 31, June 30,
Backlog (units) 2011 2010 2010

Arizona

195 84 105

California

163 79 97

Nevada

172 76 134

Washington

51

West

581 239 336

Colorado

338 273 371

Utah

125 69 130

Mountain

463 342 501

Maryland

140 126 118

Virginia

118 70 107

East

258 196 225

Florida

115 64 52

Illinois

7 1

Other Homebuilding

122 65 52

Total

1,424 842 1,114

Backlog Estimated Sales Value

$ 433,000 $ 269,000 $ 351,000

Estimated Average Selling Price of Homes in Backlog

$ 304.1 $ 319.5 $ 315.1

We define “Backlog” as homes under contract but not yet delivered. Our Backlog at June 30, 2011 compared with June 30, 2010 has increased primarily resulting from the 5% increase in home sales during the 2011 second quarter and the impact of more of the homes sold during the first six months of 2010 being closed prior to June 30, 2010.

Cancellation Rate. We define our home order “Cancellation Rate” as the approximate number of cancelled home order contracts during a reporting period as a percentage of total home order contracts received during such reporting period. The following tables set forth our Cancellation Rate by segment.

Three Months
Ended June 30, Increase
2011 2010 (Decrease)

Homebuilding

West

29 % 20 % 9 %

Mountain

31 % 31 % 0 %

East

29 % 25 % 4 %

Other Homebuilding

27 % 31 % -4 %

Consolidated

29 % 25 % 4 %

- 41 -


Table of Contents
Six Months
Ended June 30, Increase
2011 2010 (Decrease)

Homebuilding

West

29 % 20 % 9 %

Mountain

34 % 26 % 8 %

East

30 % 26 % 4 %

Other Homebuilding

28 % 32 % -4 %

Consolidated

31 % 24 % 7 %

Our consolidated Cancellation Rates during the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased mostly associated with the change in our West segment. Our consolidated Cancellation Rates during the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased mostly from our West and Mountain segments. Contributing to these foregoing increases were the following: (1) our prospective homebuyers having difficulty selling their existing homes; (2) low consumer confidence in the housing market; and (3) difficulties associated with qualifying for mortgage loans.

Active Subdivisions. The following table displays the number of our active subdivisions for each market within our homebuilding segments.

June 30, December 31, June 30,
2011 2010 2010

Arizona

30 26 26

California

16 13 6

Nevada

17 18 15

Washington

9

West

72 57 47

Colorado

40 39 41

Utah

21 19 18

Mountain

61 58 59

Maryland

13 14 10

Virginia

12 8 9

East

25 22 19

Florida

17 11 9

Illinois

1

Other Homebuilding

18 11 9

Total

176 148 134

Our active subdivisions at June 30, 2011 have increased in each of our homebuilding segments compared with both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010. These increases are the result of our on-going efforts to expand operations and generate more home closings in existing markets. However, as a result of continued uncertainty regarding the homebuilding industry, we have slowed our pace of new asset purchases and opening of new subdivisions during the 2011 second quarter, compared with recent quarters. As of June 30, 2011, we currently have more than 45 subdivisions we expect to become active in the near term and, assuming similar sales paces, we have nearly 30 subdivisions that we expect to become inactive in the near term.

Average Selling Prices Per Home Closed . The average selling price for our closed homes includes the base sales price, any purchased options and upgrades, reduced by any Sales Price Incentives (defined as discounts on the sales price of a home) or Mortgage Loan Origination Fees (defined as mortgage loan origination fees paid by Richmond American Homes to HomeAmerican). The following tables set forth our average selling prices per home closed, by market (dollars in thousands).

- 42 -


Table of Contents
Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Arizona

$ 188.1 $ 190.7 $ (2.6 ) -1 %

California

320.4 444.7 (124.3 ) -28 %

Colorado

332.0 303.0 29.0 10 %

Florida

221.4 227.3 (5.9 ) -3 %

Illinois

293.0 N/A N/M N/M

Maryland

414.9 462.5 (47.6 ) -10 %

Nevada

185.8 187.2 (1.4 ) -1 %

Utah

272.5 274.7 (2.2 ) -1 %

Virginia

426.7 476.2 (49.5 ) -10 %

Washington

270.3 N/A N/M N/M

Average

$ 290.8 $ 274.3 $ 16.5 6 %
Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Arizona

$ 184.6 $ 194.7 $ (10.1 ) -5 %

California

319.0 407.3 (88.3 ) -22 %

Colorado

334.3 302.0 32.3 11 %

Florida

225.0 224.8 0.2 0 %

Illinois

293.0 N/A N/M N/M

Maryland

422.1 449.7 (27.6 ) -6 %

Nevada

192.9 187.8 5.1 3 %

Utah

273.6 274.4 (0.8 ) 0 %

Virginia

427.9 476.8 (48.9 ) -10 %

Washington

270.3 N/A N/M N/M

Average

$ 292.6 $ 272.7 $ 19.9 7 %

N/M – Not Meaningful

The average selling price of closed homes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by 6% and 7%, respectively, primarily due to a shift in mix where we closed a higher percentage of our homes in the higher priced markets of Colorado and Virginia and closing fewer homes in our lower priced markets of Arizona and Nevada. We did experience declines in the average selling price of closed homes in our California market during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily resulting from closing homes in subdivisions with lower price points and declines in the market value of homes in certain subdivisions of this market. The declines in the average selling prices of closed homes in our Maryland and Virginia market during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily resulted from mix. In our Colorado market, the average selling price of closed homes increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily driven from closing homes in higher priced subdivisions.

Inventory . Our inventory consists of housing completed or under construction and land and land under development. Housing completed or under construction in our Consolidated Balance Sheets primarily includes: (1) land costs transferred from land and land under development; (2) hard costs associated with the construction of a house; (3) overhead costs, which include real property taxes, engineering and permit fees; (4) capitalized interest; and (5) certain indirect fees. Land and land under development on our Consolidated Balance Sheets primarily includes land acquisition costs, land development costs associated with subdivisions for which we have the intent to construct and sell homes and capitalized interest.

- 43 -


Table of Contents

The following table shows the carrying value of housing completed or under construction for each market within our homebuilding segments (dollars in thousands).

June 30, December 31, June 30,
2011 2010 2010

Arizona

$ 29,326 $ 31,923 $ 41,374

California

46,802 49,516 39,411

Nevada

26,264 33,377 32,495

Washington

16,563

West

118,955 114,816 113,280

Colorado

93,200 111,397 121,558

Utah

21,234 26,372 31,826

Mountain

114,434 137,769 153,384

Maryland

46,000 48,740 47,808

Virginia

36,896 45,836 45,127

East

82,896 94,576 92,935

Florida

18,175 24,262 23,372

Illinois

2,054 999

Other Homebuilding

20,229 25,261 23,372

Total

$ 336,514 $ 372,422 $ 382,971

The table below shows the stage of construction for our homes completed or under construction, number of sold homes under construction and model homes (in units).

June 30, December 31, June 30,
2011 2010 2010

Unsold Homes Under Construction - Final

42 119 47

Unsold Homes Under Construction - Frame

353 722 720

Unsold Homes Under Construction - Foundation

101 103 124

Total Unsold Homes Under Construction

496 944 891

Sold Homes Under Construction

843 609 865

Model Homes

231 242 226

Homes Completed or Under Construction

1,570 1,795 1,982

Our housing completed and under construction decreased by $35.9 million, as we decreased the total unsold homes under construction to 496 at June 30, 2011 from 944 at December 31, 2010. This decrease primarily resulted from our efforts to sell and close our spec inventory that had increased during 2010 primarily because of an increase in active subdivisions and the anticipation of selling homes prior to the expiration of the federal homebuyer tax credit, which required the sale of a home to be completed by April 30, 2010 with a closing date by June 30, 2010. (The Homebuyer Assistance and Improvement Act, signed into law July 2, 2010, extended the closing date requirement to September 30, 2010.) However our total unsold homes under construction remained high at December 31, 2010 as a result of the continued low levels of net orders for homes during the year ended December 31, 2010.

The following table shows the carrying value of land and land under development for each market within our homebuilding segments (dollars in thousands).

- 44 -


Table of Contents
June 30, December 31, June 30,
2011 2010 2010

Arizona

$ 39,099 $ 41,892 $ 48,957

California

115,541 93,194 87,374

Nevada

50,729 32,605 20,393

Washington

9,600

West

214,969 167,691 156,724

Colorado

147,643 128,727 120,748

Utah

30,026 30,457 30,298

Mountain

177,669 159,184 151,046

Maryland

45,510 31,782 15,780

Virginia

71,640 44,083 36,071

East

117,150 75,865 51,851

Florida

11,627 9,274 7,580

Illinois

2,819 3,223 3,151

Other Homebuilding

14,446 12,497 10,731

Total

$ 524,234 $ 415,237 $ 370,352

The tables below show the total number of lots owned (excluding homes completed or under construction) and lots controlled under option agreements for each market within our homebuilding segments (in units).

- 45 -


Table of Contents
June 30, December 31, June 30,
2011 2010 2010

Lots Owned

Arizona

1,064 1,257 1,165

California

1,376 1,201 1,130

Nevada

1,184 991 681

Washington

232

West

3,856 3,449 2,976

Colorado

3,240 2,919 2,893

Utah

579 594 569

Mountain

3,819 3,513 3,462

Maryland

380 319 199

Virginia

589 414 371

East

969 733 570

Florida

269 210 184

Illinois

123 130 134

Other Homebuilding

392 340 318

Total

9,036 8,035 7,326

Lots Controlled Under Option

Arizona

108 408 499

California

222 152

Nevada

398 838 570

Washington

42

West

548 1,468 1,221

Colorado

602 688 644

Utah

298 393 156

Mountain

900 1,081 800

Maryland

795 745 655

Virginia

234 132 272

East

1,029 877 927

Florida

480 733 658

Illinois

Other Homebuilding

480 733 658

Total

2,957 4,159 3,606

Total Lots Owned and Controlled

11,993 12,194 10,932

The table below shows the amount of at risk option deposits (in thousands).

June 30, December 31, June 30,
2011 2010 2010

Cash

$ 10,534 $ 9,019 $ 7,933

Letters of Credit

6,716 4,467 2,727

Total At Risk Option Deposits

$ 17,250 $ 13,486 $ 10,660

- 46 -


Table of Contents

Our total lots owned (excluding homes completed or under construction) increased by 1,001 units from December 31, 2010 primarily resulting from the purchase of lots that we controlled under option contracts as of December 31, 2010. Also contributing to the increase in lots owned was the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of SDC and related entities in April 2011 where we have 232 owned lots as of June 30, 2011. The decline in total lots under option primarily resulted from purchasing lots during the quarter and electing not to purchase lots which were under option. As a result of not purchasing lots that were under option, we recorded $2.1 million and $2.9 million of expenses of project write-off costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. We did, however, see an increase in the amount of option deposits at risk primarily attributable to new lot option contracts in the markets of our East segment, where greater option deposits were required by land sellers.

HomeAmerican Operating Activities

The following table sets forth information relating to mortgage loans originated by our HomeAmerican operations, mortgage loans brokered and our Capture Rate (dollars in thousands). The “Capture Rate” is defined as the number of mortgage loans originated by HomeAmerican for our homebuyers as a percent of total Company home closings.

Three Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Principal amount of mortgage loans originated

$ 146,275 $ 240,693 $ (94,418 ) -39 %

Principal amount of mortgage loans brokered

$ 2,177 $ 2,660 $ (483 ) -18 %

Capture Rate

75 % 83 % -8 %

Including brokered loans

76 % 84 % -8 %

Mortgage products (% of mortgage loans originated)

Fixed rate

96 % 97 % -1 %

Adjustable rate - other

4 % 3 % 1 %

Prime loans (1)

27 % 26 % 1 %

Government loans (2)

73 % 74 % -1 %
Six Months
Ended June 30, Change
2011 2010 Amount %

Principal amount of mortgage loans originated

$ 261,655 $ 348,783 $ (87,128 ) -25 %

Principal amount of mortgage loans brokered

$ 2,896 $ 5,516 $ (2,620 ) -47 %

Capture Rate

75 % 82 % -7 %

Including brokered loans

76 % 83 % -7 %

Mortgage products (% of mortgage loans originated)

Fixed rate

96 % 96 % 0 %

Adjustable rate - other

4 % 4 % 0 %

Prime loans (1)

29 % 25 % 4 %

Government loans (2)

71 % 75 % -4 %

(1)

Prime loans are defined as loans with Fair, Isaac & Company (“FICO”) scores greater than 620 and which comply with the documentation standards of the government sponsored enterprise guidelines.

(2)

Government loans are loans either insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.

- 47 -


Table of Contents

The principal amount of mortgage loans originated decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the Company closing 426 and 395 fewer homes, respectively, and declines in the Capture Rates during the 2011 periods. HomeAmerican’s Capture Rate declined during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily resulting from having an increase in the number of homebuyers who paid cash for their homes.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We use our liquidity and capital resources to (1) support our operations, including the purchase of land, land development and construction of homes; (2) provide working capital; and (3) provide mortgage loans for our homebuyers. Our liquidity includes our balances of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and capital resources, our senior notes and Mortgage Repurchase Facility (as defined below). Additionally, we have an existing effective shelf registration statement that allows us to issue equity, debt or hybrid securities up to $750 million.

On July 7, 2011, the Company completed a debt tender offer extinguishing $63.7 million of its 7% Senior Notes due 2012 and $173.3 million of its 5 1 / 2 % Senior Notes due 2013. The Company paid $256.7 million, including interest and fees, for the acquired notes and, as a result of the tender, the Company will record an $18.6 million charge associated with the extinguishment of debt during the 2011 third quarter.

The Company’s marketable securities consist of fixed rate and floating rate interest earning securities, primarily: (1) debt securities, which may include, among others, United States government and government agency debt and corporate debt; (2) holdings in mutual fund equity securities and (3) deposit securities, which may include, among others, certificates of deposit and time deposits.

Capital Resources

Our capital structure is primarily a combination of (1) permanent financing, represented by stockholders’ equity; (2) long-term financing, represented by our publicly traded 7% senior notes due 2012, 5 1 / 2 % senior notes due 2013, 5 3 / 8 % medium-term senior notes due 2014 and 2015 and 5 5 / 8 % senior notes due 2020; and (3) our Mortgage Repurchase Facility. Because of our current balance of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and available capacity under our Mortgage Repurchase Facility, we believe that our capital resources are adequate to satisfy our short and long-term capital requirements, including meeting future payments on our senior notes as they become due . See “Forward-Looking Statements” above.

Senior Notes and Mortgage Repurchase Facility

Senior Notes . Our senior notes are not secured and, while the senior note indentures contain some restrictions on secured debt and other transactions, they do not contain financial covenants. Our senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis, jointly and severally, by most of our homebuilding segment subsidiaries.

Mortgage Lending. HomeAmerican has a Master Repurchase Agreement, which expires September 16, 2011 (the “Mortgage Repurchase Facility”), with U.S. Bank National Association (“USBNA”) and can include other banks that become parties to the Mortgage Repurchase Facility (collectively with USBNA, the “Buyers”). As of June 30, 2011, USBNA was the only Buyer under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility. The Mortgage Repurchase Facility provides liquidity to HomeAmerican by providing for the sale of eligible mortgage loans to USBNA (as agent for the Buyers) with an agreement by HomeAmerican to repurchase the mortgage loans at a future date. Until such mortgage loans are transferred back to HomeAmerican, the documents relating to such loans are held by USBNA, as agent for the Buyers and as custodian, pursuant to the Custody Agreement (“Custody Agreement”), dated as of November 12, 2008, by and between HomeAmerican and USBNA. The Mortgage Repurchase Facility has a maximum aggregate commitment of $70 million and includes an accordion feature that permits the maximum aggregate commitment to be increased to $150 million, subject to the availability of additional commitments. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $9.0 million and $25.4 million, respectively, of mortgage loans that we are obligated to repurchase under our Mortgage Repurchase Facility. Mortgage loans that we are obligated to repurchase under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility are accounted for as a debt financing arrangement and are reported as mortgage repurchase facility on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Advances under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility carry a Pricing Rate equal to the greater of (i) the LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Mortgage Repurchase Facility) plus 2.5%, or (ii) 3.75%. At HomeAmerican’s option the Balance Funded Rate (equal to 3.75%) may be applied to advances under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility provided the applicable Buyer is holding sufficient Qualifying Balances. The foregoing terms are defined in the Mortgage Repurchase Facility.

- 48 -


Table of Contents

The Mortgage Repurchase Facility contains various representations, warranties and affirmative and negative covenants customary for agreements of this type. The negative covenants include, among others, (i) an Adjusted Tangible Net Worth requirement, (ii) a minimum Adjusted Tangible Net Worth Ratio, (iii) an Adjusted Net Income requirement, (iv) a minimum Liquidity requirement; and (v) a requirement that HomeAmerican’s HUD Compare Ratio may be no more than 1.50 to 1.00. Adjusted Tangible Net Worth means the sum of (a) all assets of HomeAmerican less (b) the sum of (i) all Debt and all Contingent Indebtedness of HomeAmerican, (ii) all assets of HomeAmerican that would be classified as intangible assets under generally accepted accounting principles, and (iii) receivables from Affiliates. HomeAmerican’s Adjusted Tangible Net Worth Ratio is the ratio of HomeAmerican’s total liabilities (excluding Permitted Letters of Credit) to the Adjusted Tangible Net Worth. HomeAmerican’s Adjusted Net Income is a rolling twelve consecutive months of net income for HomeAmerican. HomeAmerican’s Liquidity is defined as its unencumbered and unrestricted cash and Cash Equivalents plus the amount by which the aggregate Purchase Value of all Purchased Loans at such time exceeds the aggregate Purchase Price outstanding for all Open Transactions at such time. HomeAmerican’s HUD Compare Ratio is the ratio of (a) the percentage of HomeAmerican’s FHA Mortgage Loan originations that were seriously delinquent or claim terminated in the first two years to (b) the percentage of all such Mortgage Loan originations. The foregoing terms are defined in the Mortgage Repurchase Facility.

Failure to meet the foregoing negative covenants would constitute an event of default. In the event of default, USBNA may, at its option, declare the Repurchase Date for any or all Transactions to be deemed immediately to occur. Upon such event of default, and if USBNA exercises its right to terminate any Transactions, then (a) HomeAmerican’s obligation to repurchase all Purchased Loans in such Transactions will become immediately due and payable; (b) the Repurchase Price for each such Transaction shall be increased by the aggregate amount obtained by daily multiplication of (i) the greater of the Pricing Rate for such Transaction and the Default Pricing Rate by (ii) the Purchase Price for the Transaction as of the Repurchase Date, (c) all Income paid after the event of default will be payable to and retained by USBNA and applied to the aggregate unpaid Repurchase Prices owed by HomeAmerican and (d) HomeAmerican shall deliver any documents relating to Purchased Loans subject to such Transactions to USBNA. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, USBNA may (a) sell any or all Purchased Loans subject to such Transactions on a servicing released or servicing retained basis and apply the proceeds to the unpaid amounts owed by HomeAmerican, (b) give HomeAmerican credit for such Purchased Loans in an amount equal to the Market Value and apply such credit to the unpaid amounts owed by HomeAmerican, (c) replace HomeAmerican as Servicer, (d) exercise its right under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility with respect to the Income Account and Escrow Account, and (e) with notice to HomeAmerican, declare the Termination Date to have occurred. The foregoing terms are defined in the Mortgage Repurchase Facility.

The table below sets forth the actual results of the covenant calculations and covenant requirements under the Mortgage Repurchase Facility at June 30, 2011.

Covenant Test Covenant Results

Adjusted Tangible Net Worth (minimum)

$ 18,000,000 $ 26,199,000

Adjusted Tangible Net Worth Ratio (maximum)

8.0 : 1.0 0.7: 1.0

Adjusted Net Income (minimum)

$ 1 $ 5,374,000

Liquidity Test (minimum)

$ 8,000,000 $ 29,166,000

We believe we are in compliance with the representations, warranties and covenants included in the Mortgage Repurchase Facility and we are not aware of any covenant violations.

MDC Common Stock Repurchase Program

At June 30, 2011, we were authorized to repurchase up to 4,000,000 shares of our common stock. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the three or six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

- 49 -


Table of Contents

Consolidated Cash Flow

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we used $69.3 million of cash in operating activities, primarily due to using $107.9 million to increase in our land inventory levels through the purchase of lots during the first six months of 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 we increased our land units by 769, excluding the impact of the 232 lots in our Washington division. This use of cash was partially offset by generating $51.4 million in cash associated with the decrease in our housing completed or under construction as we closed 1,263 homes during the first six months of 2011 and reduced our total units of homes completed or under construction by 13% from December 31, 2010.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we used $178.9 million of cash from operating activities, primarily due to the increase of our homebuilding inventory, which resulted in the use of $228.3 million of cash during the first six months of 2010 as we purchased more than 3,300 lots and increased the total sold and unsold homes under construction from 1,109 at December 31, 2009 to 1,756 at June 30, 2010. Additionally, we used $85.4 million as a result of an increase in our home sales and other receivable and mortgage loans held-for-sale. These items partially were offset by the reduction of $144.5 million in our income tax receivable.

We generated $293.0 million in cash from investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily attributable to the maturity and sale of marketable securities that increased our cash by $726.7 million, partially offset by the purchase of $404.5 million of marketable securities. We used $29.3 million in cash for the purchase of property, equipment and other.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we invested $722.2 million into marketable securities and spent $5.1 million for property and equipment relating to our new enterprise resource planning system. These items partially were offset by the $109.1 million of marketable securities that matured or were sold during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we used $40.1 million in cash for financing activities primarily attributable to $23.7 million associated with cash dividends that were paid during the first six months of 2011 and net payments on our mortgage repurchase facility, which resulted in use of $16.4 million of cash during the period. During the first six months of 2010, we generated $255.0 million in cash from financing activities, primarily due to the issuance of senior notes that raised $242.3 million. The proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes were used for general corporate purposes. Additionally, we had a net borrowing under our Mortgage Repurchase Facility of $36.2 million. Partially offsetting these items was $23.6 million in dividend payments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into lot option purchase contracts in order to procure lots for the construction of homes. Lot option contracts enable us to control lot positions with a minimal capital investment, which substantially reduces the risks associated with land ownership and development. At June 30, 2011, we had deposits of $10.5 million in the form of cash and $6.7 million in the form of letters of credit that were at risk to secure option contracts to purchase lots.

At June 30, 2011, we had outstanding performance bonds and letters of credit totaling approximately $74.4 million and $22.9 million, respectively, including $9.1 million in letters of credit issued by HomeAmerican, with the remaining bonds and letters of credit issued by third-parties, to secure our performance under various contracts. We expect that the obligations secured by these performance bonds and letters of credit generally will be performed in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with the applicable contractual terms. To the extent that the obligations are performed, the related performance bonds and letters of credit should be released and we should not have any continuing obligations. However, in the event any such performance bonds or letters of credit are called, our indemnity obligations could require us to reimburse the issuer of the performance bond or letter of credit.

We have made no material guarantees with respect to third-party obligations.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations have not changed materially from those reported in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

- 50 -


Table of Contents

IMPACT OF INFLATION, CHANGING PRICES AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

The impact of inflation and changing prices have not changed materially from the disclosure in our December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

OTHER

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as statements made by us in periodic press releases, oral statements made by our officials in the course of presentations about the Company and conference calls in connection with quarterly earnings releases, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operation, cash flows, strategies and prospects. These forward-looking statements may be identified by terminology such as “likely,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Report are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any further disclosures made on related subjects in subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K should be consulted. Additionally, information about issues that could lead to material changes in performance and risk factors that have the potential to affect us is contained under the caption “Risk Factors Relating to our Business” in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes from the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K related to the Company’s exposure to market risk from interest rates.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Conclusion regarding the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures - An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures was performed under the supervision, and with the participation, of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at June 30, 2011.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting - In our Florida homebuilding division, we began operating under our new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system during the 2011 second quarter. As a result, our financial and operating transactions in this division is now utilizing the functionality provided by the new ERP system with oversight as to the completeness and accuracy of the information being performed through the ERP system. The full implementation of the ERP system in the other homebuilding divisions not currently operating under our new ERP system is scheduled to take place over the course of the next several quarters. There was no other change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the 2011 second quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

- 51 -


Table of Contents

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Because of the nature of the homebuilding business, we and certain of our subsidiaries and affiliates have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, including product liability claims and claims associated with the sale and financing of our homes. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Additionally, litigation has been filed by homeowners in West Virginia against MDC, its subsidiary Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc. (“RAH West Virginia”) and various subcontractors alleging a failure to install functional passive radon mitigation systems in their homes. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages and medical monitoring costs for alleged negligent construction, failure to warn, breach of warranty or contract, breach of implied warranty of habitability, fraud, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress based upon alleged exposure to radon gas. The litigation includes the following actions:

Joy, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 08-C-204, Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Joy ”). This action was filed on May 16, 2008, by sixty-six plaintiffs from sixteen households. The Company and RAH West Virginia have answered and asserted cross-claims against the subcontractors for contractual and implied indemnity and contribution.

Bauer, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 08-C-431, Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Bauer ”). This action was filed on October 24, 2008, by eighty-six plaintiffs from twenty-one households. This action has been consolidated for discovery and pre-trial proceedings with the Joy action.

Saliba, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 08-C-447, Circuit Court, Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Saliba ”). This action was filed on November 7, 2008, by thirty-five plaintiffs from nine households. This action has been consolidated for discovery and pre-trial proceedings with the Joy action.

By orders dated November 4 and 18, 2009, the trial court struck the answers filed by the Company and RAH West Virginia and entered judgment by default in favor of the plaintiffs on liability, with damages to be determined in a subsequent jury trial. On December 7, 2009, the Company and RAH West Virginia filed with the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals a motion seeking to stay the proceedings and a petition for writ of prohibition to vacate the default judgment. On June 16, 2010, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals granted the Company and RAH West Virginia a writ of prohibition and vacated the trial court’s sanctions orders.

On July 29, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a renewed motion for sanctions based on substantially the same alleged misconduct. On January 14, 2011, the trial court again entered an order striking the answers filed by the Company and RAH West Virginia and imposing judgment by default upon them on the claims asserted in plaintiffs’ complaints (exclusive of the claim for punitive damages). As stated in the January 14, 2011 order, the cross-claims made by the Company and RAH West Virginia remain in effect.

On March 31, 2011 the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals declined to enter a writ of prohibition with respect to the trial court’s re-entry of its judgment of default stating that the issues presented are more properly presented on appeal after full development of the record in the lower court.

Separately, additional claims have been filed by homeowners in West Virginia against the Company, RAH West Virginia and individual superintendants who had worked for RAH West Virginia. The new litigation consists of the following:

- 52 -


Table of Contents

Thorin, et al. v. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc., et al. , No. 10-C-154, Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia (“ Thorin ”). This litigation was filed on May 12, 2010, by forty plaintiffs from eleven households in Jefferson and Berkeley Counties. To date, this action has not been consolidated for any purposes with the prior three actions. The claims asserted and the relief sought in the Thorin case are substantially similar to the Joy, Bauer and Saliba cases.

MDC and RAH West Virginia believe that they have meritorious defenses to each of the lawsuits and intend to vigorously defend the actions.

We can give no assurance as to the final outcomes of these cases, or whether they would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no significant changes in the risk factors previously identified as being attendant to our business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. For a more complete discussion of other risk factors that affect our business, see “Risk Factors Relating to our Business” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which include the following:

The homebuilding industry is undergoing a significant downturn, and its duration and ultimate severity are uncertain. A continuation or further deterioration in industry conditions or in the broader economic conditions could have additional adverse effects on our business and financial results.

Increased competition levels in the homebuilding and mortgage lending industries could result in lower net home orders, closings and decreases in the average selling prices of sold and closed homes, which would have a negative impact on our home sales revenue and results of operations.

Further decline in the market value of our homes or carrying value of our land would have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Our strategies in responding to the adverse conditions in the homebuilding industry and in the U.S. economy have had limited success, and the continued implementation of these and other strategies may not be successful.

Increases in our Cancellation Rate could have a negative impact on our Home Gross Margins and home sales revenue.

If land is not available at reasonable prices, our homes sales revenue and results of operations could be negatively impacted and/or we could be required to scale back our operations in a given market.

If mortgage interest rates rise or if mortgage financing otherwise becomes less affordable, it could adversely affect our sales and business, and the duration and ultimate severity of the effects are uncertain.

We have financial needs that we meet through the capital markets, including the debt and secondary mortgage markets, and continued disruptions in these markets could have an adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position and/or cash flows.

In the ordinary course of business, we are required to obtain performance bonds, the unavailability of which could adversely affect our results of operations and/or cash flows.

Further uncertainty in the mortgage lending industry, including repurchase requirements associated with HomeAmerican’s sale of mortgage loans, could negatively impact our results of operations.

Decreases in the market value of our investments in marketable securities could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

- 53 -


Table of Contents

We are utilizing a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system in four of our homebuilding divisions, our Corporate office and our non-homebuilding subsidiaries and, if we encounter significant problems with this implementation or implementation throughout our remaining homebuilding divisions, it could have an adverse impact on our operating activities and/or financial reporting capabilities.

Our financial services operations have concentration risks that could impact our results of operations.

Our business is subject to numerous federal, local and state laws and regulations concerning land development, construction of homes, sales, mortgage lending, environmental and other aspects of our business. These laws and regulations could give rise to additional liabilities or expenditures, or restrictions on our business.

Product liability litigation and warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of business may be costly.

Our income tax provision or benefit and other tax liabilities may be insufficient if taxing authorities are successful in asserting tax positions that are contrary to our position.

The homebuilding industry is cyclical and affected by changes in general economic, real estate or other business conditions that could adversely affect our business or financial results.

Because of the seasonal nature of our business, our quarterly operating results can fluctuate.

Supply shortages and other risks related to the demand for skilled labor and building materials could increase costs and delay deliveries.

Natural disasters could cause an increase in home construction costs, as well as delays, and could negatively impact our results of operations.

We are dependent on the services of key employees, and the loss of their services could hurt our business.

The interests of certain controlling shareholders may be adverse to investors.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company did not repurchase any shares during the second quarter of 2011. In conjunction with the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of SDC Homes, LLC and certain affiliated entities as of April 28, 2011, the Company issued 176,716 shares of its common stock, valued at $5 million, to Robert Trent, the principal owner of the seller entities. The shares issued to Mr. Trent were unregistered, having been issued in a private placement under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and are subject to the terms of a restricted stock agreement. The agreement provides for 25%, 25% and 10% of the shares, respectively, to vest after each of the first three anniversaries of the effective date of the agreement, conditioned on Mr. Trent remaining employed. The final 40% of the stock will vest on December 31, 2015, conditioned on Mr. Trent remaining employed. The Company may use any unvested shares to apply against guaranty obligations that Mr. Trent has undertaken.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

None.

- 54 -


Table of Contents
Item 5. Other Information

On July 26, 2011, MDC’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of twenty five cents ($0.25) per share. The dividend will be paid on August 24 2011 to shareowners of record on August 10, 2011.

Item 6. Exhibits

10.1 Second Amendment to the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Amended Executive Officer Performance-Based Compensation Plan, dated as of June 1, 2011.
10.2 Form of 2011 Stock Option Agreement (2011 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors).
10.3 Form of 2011 Stock Option Agreement (2011 Equity Incentive Plan).
10.4 Form of 2011 Restricted Stock Agreement (2011 Equity Incentive Plan).
12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Schedule.
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 The following financial statements, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (iv) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. The information in Exhibit 101 is “furnished” and not “filed,” as provided in Rule 402 of Regulation S-T.

- 55 -


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 4, 2011 M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
By:

/s/ Vilia Valentine

Vilia Valentine,
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

- 56 -


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

10.1 Second Amendment to the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Amended Executive Officer Performance-Based Compensation Plan, dated as of June 1, 2011.
10.2 Form of 2011 Stock Option Agreement (2011 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors).
10.3 Form of 2011 Stock Option Agreement (2011 Equity Incentive Plan).
10.4 Form of 2011 Restricted Stock Agreement (2011 Equity Incentive Plan).
12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Schedule.
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 The following financial statements, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (iv) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. The information in Exhibit 101 is “furnished” and not “filed,” as provided in Rule 402 of Regulation S-T.

- 57 -

TABLE OF CONTENTS