These terms and conditions govern your use of the website alphaminr.com and its related services.
These Terms and Conditions (“Terms”) are a binding contract between you and Alphaminr, (“Alphaminr”, “we”, “us” and “service”). You must agree to and accept the Terms. These Terms include the provisions in this document as well as those in the Privacy Policy. These terms may be modified at any time.
Your subscription will be on a month to month basis and automatically renew every month. You may terminate your subscription at any time through your account.
We will provide you with advance notice of any change in fees.
You represent that you are of legal age to form a binding contract. You are responsible for any
activity associated with your account. The account can be logged in at only one computer at a
time.
The Services are intended for your own individual use. You shall only use the Services in a
manner that complies with all laws. You may not use any automated software, spider or system to
scrape data from Alphaminr.
Alphaminr is not a financial advisor and does not provide financial advice of any kind. The service is provided “As is”. The materials and information accessible through the Service are solely for informational purposes. While we strive to provide good information and data, we make no guarantee or warranty as to its accuracy.
TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL ALPHAMINR BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR INVESTMENT LOSSES, LOSS OF DATA, OR ACCURACY OF DATA, OR FOR ANY AMOUNT, IN THE AGGREGATE, IN EXCESS OF THE GREATER OF (1) FIFTY DOLLARS OR (2) THE AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU TO ALPHAMINR IN THE SIX MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THIS APPLICABLE CLAIM. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL OR CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES, SO THE ABOVE LIMITATION AND EXCLUSIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
If any provision of these Terms is found to be invalid under any applicable law, such provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions herein.
This privacy policy describes how we (“Alphaminr”) collect, use, share and protect your personal information when we provide our service (“Service”). This Privacy Policy explains how information is collected about you either directly or indirectly. By using our service, you acknowledge the terms of this Privacy Notice. If you do not agree to the terms of this Privacy Policy, please do not use our Service. You should contact us if you have questions about it. We may modify this Privacy Policy periodically.
When you register for our Service, we collect information from you such as your name, email address and credit card information.
Like many other websites we use “cookies”, which are small text files that are stored on your computer or other device that record your preferences and actions, including how you use the website. You can set your browser or device to refuse all cookies or to alert you when a cookie is being sent. If you delete your cookies, if you opt-out from cookies, some Services may not function properly. We collect information when you use our Service. This includes which pages you visit.
We use Google Analytics and we use Stripe for payment processing. We will not share the information we collect with third parties for promotional purposes. We may share personal information with law enforcement as required or permitted by law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Confidential, for Use of Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
|
|
|
☒
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐
|
|
Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
|
|
☒
|
|
No fee required.
|
||
|
☐
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
||
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
☐
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
||
|
☐
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
||
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Elect the six nominees named in this proxy statement to serve on our Board of Directors until the next annual meeting of shareholders, each until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;
|
|
2.
|
Approve the reincorporation of the Company from the State of Texas to the State of Delaware;
|
|
3.
|
Approve, on an advisory basis, Named Executive Officer compensation;
|
|
4.
|
Ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2021;
|
|
5.
|
Approve the grant of discretionary authority to the chairman of the Annual Meeting to adjourn the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Annual Meeting to approve any of Proposals 1-4; and
|
|
6.
|
Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JULY 27, 2020.
The Notice of Virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting and our
Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020 are available at
www.viewproxy.com/MitchamIndustries/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Proposal 1 (Election of Directors)
: To be elected, each nominee for election as a director must receive the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by holders of shares of common stock entitled to vote on the proposal. This means that director nominees with the most votes are elected. Votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from the election of each nominee. Votes that are withheld from a director’s election will be counted toward a quorum but will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of a director. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the election of a director.
|
|
•
|
Proposal 2 (Approval of Reincorporation of the Company from the State of Texas to the State of Delaware):
Approval of reincorporation of the Company from the State of Texas to the State of Delaware, including an increase in (i) the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.01, from 20,000,000 to 40,000,000 and (ii) the number of authorized shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00, from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 requires the affirmative vote of at least (1) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of our common stock and (2) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, voting separately. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against the proposal.
|
|
•
|
Proposal 3 (Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation)
: Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote on this proposal at the Annual Meeting; provided that, for purposes of this sentence, broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast, and, accordingly, will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against this proposal. You may vote for, against or expressly abstain with respect to this proposal. While this vote is required by law, it will neither be binding on the Company or our Board, nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary duty on, the Company or our Board. However, the views of our shareholders are important to us, and our Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
|
|
•
|
Proposal 4 (Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm)
: Ratification of the selection of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2021 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote on, and voted for or against, or expressly abstained with respect to, this proposal at the Annual Meeting. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote on this proposal, your broker will be permitted to vote your shares in its discretion on this proposal. As a result, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with this proposal. Abstentions will have the same practical effect as a vote against this proposal.
|
|
•
|
Proposal 5 (Approval to Grant Discretionary Authority to the Chairman of the Annual Meeting to Adjourn Annual Meeting)
: Approval to grant the chairman of the Annual Meeting discretionary authority to adjourn the Annual Meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote on this proposal, your broker will be permitted to vote your shares in its discretion on this proposal. As a result, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with this proposal. Abstentions will have the same practical effect as a vote against this proposal.
|
|
•
|
conflicts of interest;
|
|
•
|
insider trading;
|
|
•
|
record keeping and questionable accounting or auditing matters;
|
|
•
|
corporate opportunities;
|
|
•
|
confidentiality;
|
|
•
|
competition and fair dealing;
|
|
•
|
compliance with laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and similar laws in other countries in which we operate;
|
|
•
|
protection and proper use of the Company assets; and
|
|
•
|
reporting of any illegal or unethical behavior.
|
|
•
|
overseeing the quality and integrity of our financial statements and other financial information we provide to any governmental body or the public;
|
|
•
|
overseeing our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
|
|
•
|
overseeing the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;
|
|
•
|
overseeing our systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting and legal compliance that our management and our Board have established;
|
|
•
|
facilitating an open avenue of communication among the registered independent accountants, financial and senior management, and our Board, with the registered independent accountants being accountable to the Audit Committee; and
|
|
•
|
performing such other duties as directed by our Board.
|
|
•
|
review, evaluate and approve the agreements, plans, policies and programs to compensate our officers and directors;
|
|
•
|
review and discuss with our management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the proxy statement for our annual meeting of shareholders, if applicable, and to determine whether to recommend to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, if any, be included in the proxy statement, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations;
|
|
•
|
produce the Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in the proxy statement, in accordance with, and once required by, applicable rules and regulations;
|
|
•
|
otherwise discharge our Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of our officers and directors; and
|
|
•
|
perform such other functions as our Board may assign to the committee from time to time.
|
|
•
|
preparing materials in advance of Compensation Committee meetings for review by the Compensation Committee members;
|
|
•
|
evaluating employee performance;
|
|
•
|
establishing our business goals; and
|
|
•
|
recommending the compensation arrangements and components for our employees.
|
|
•
|
providing background information regarding our business goals;
|
|
•
|
annually reviewing performance of each of our executive officers (other than themselves); and
|
|
•
|
recommending compensation arrangements and components for our executive officers (other than themselves).
|
|
•
|
identifying individuals qualified to become Board members;
|
|
•
|
recommending to our Board the persons to be nominated by our Board for election as directors at the annual meeting of shareholders; and
|
|
•
|
performing such other functions as our Board may assign to the committee from time to time.
|
|
•
|
the Audit Committee approves or ratifies the transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy and if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party;
|
|
•
|
the transaction is approved by the disinterested members of our Board; or
|
|
•
|
the transaction involves compensation approved by the Compensation Committee.
|
|
•
|
a senior officer (which includes, at a minimum, each executive vice president and Section 16 officer) or director;
|
|
•
|
a shareholder owning more than 5% of the Company (or its controlled affiliates);
|
|
•
|
a person who is an immediate family member of a senior officer or director; or
|
|
•
|
an entity which is owned or controlled by someone listed above, or an entity in which someone listed above has a substantial ownership interest or control of that entity.
|
|
•
|
transactions available to all employees generally; and
|
|
•
|
transactions involving less than $5,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions.
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
|
Preferred Stock Beneficially Owned
|
||||||||
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
(1)
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percent of Class
(2)
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percent of Class
(3)
|
||||
|
Ariel Investments, LLC
|
|
2,872,310
(4)
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
200 E. Randolph Drive
Suite 2900
Chicago, IL 60601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Wasatch Advisors, Inc.
|
|
1,070,281
(5)
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
505 Wakara Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
|
|
910,584
(6)
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
174,046
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
6-1, 6-Chome,
Hikoshima-Enoura-Cho Shimonoseki 750-8505 Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
(1)
|
“Beneficial ownership” is a term broadly defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act and includes more than the typical forms of stock ownership, that is, stock held in the person’s name. The term also includes what is referred to as “indirect ownership,” meaning ownership of shares as to which a person has or shares investment or voting power. For the purpose of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares as of May 27, 2020 if that person or group has the right to acquire shares within 60 days after such date.
|
|
(2)
|
Based on total shares outstanding of 12,182,233 at May 27, 2020 unless otherwise indicated.
|
|
(3)
|
Based on total shares outstanding of 994,046 at May 27, 2020 unless otherwise indicated.
|
|
(4)
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G as of December 31, 2019 and filed on February 14, 2020 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the Schedule 13G, Ariel Investments, LLC had sole voting power over 2,710,358 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power over 2,872,310 shares of our common stock.
|
|
(5)
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G as of December 31, 2019 and filed on February 10, 2020 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the Schedule 13G, Wasatch Advisors, Inc. had shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 1,070,281 shares of our common stock.
|
|
(6)
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G as of December 31, 2019 and filed on February 12, 2020 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the Schedule 13G, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP had sole voting power over 874,511 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power over 910,584 shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
||||
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
(1)
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percent of Class
(2)
|
||
|
Peter H. Blum
|
|
628,528
(3)
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
William H. Hilarides
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert J. Albers
|
|
122,467
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Thomas S. Glanville
|
|
113,500
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Marcus Rowland
|
|
103,500
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert P. Capps
|
|
301,929
(7)
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Guy Malden
|
|
287,580
(8)
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
Mark A. Cox
|
|
43,333
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
|
|
1,606,338
(10)
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
Less than 1%
|
|
(1)
|
“Beneficial ownership” is a term broadly defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act and includes more than the typical forms of stock ownership, that is, stock held in the person’s name. The term also includes what is referred to as “indirect ownership,” meaning ownership of shares as to which a person has or shares investment or voting power. For the purpose of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares as of May 27, 2020 if that person or group has the right to acquire shares within 60 days after such date.
|
|
(2)
|
Based on total shares outstanding of 12,182,233 at May 27, 2020 and shares which such individual has the right to acquire within 60 days of May 27, 2020.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes 101,000 shares underlying exercisable options.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 107,667 shares underlying exercisable options
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 93,000 shares underlying exercisable options.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 93,000 shares underlying exercisable options.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes 259,999 shares underlying exercisable options.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes 259,999 shares underlying exercisable options.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes 43,333 shares underlying exercisable options.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes 954,998 shares underlying exercisable options.
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions Held
|
|
Director Since
|
|
Peter H. Blum
|
|
63
|
|
Non-Executive Chairman
|
|
2000
|
|
Robert P. Capps
|
|
66
|
|
Director, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2004
|
|
William H. Hilarides
|
|
61
|
|
Director
|
|
2019
|
|
Robert J. Albers
|
|
79
|
|
Director
|
|
2008
|
|
Thomas S. Glanville
|
|
61
|
|
Director
|
|
2015
|
|
Marcus Rowland
|
|
68
|
|
Director
|
|
2015
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions Held
|
|
Robert P. Capps
|
|
66
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Guy Malden
|
|
68
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of Marine Systems
|
|
Mark A. Cox
|
|
60
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President Finance and Accounting
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Robert P. Capps
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Guy Malden
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of Marine Systems
|
|
Mark A. Cox
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President Finance and Accounting
|
|
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
January 31
|
|
Salary
|
|
Option
Awards
(1)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
(2)
|
|
Total
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
||||
|
Robert P. Capps
|
|
2020
|
|
281,325
|
|
|
93,702
|
|
|
13,257
|
|
|
388,284
|
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
262,650
|
|
|
92,752
|
|
|
12,516
|
|
|
367,918
|
|
|
Guy Malden
|
|
2020
|
|
271,948
|
|
|
93,702
|
|
|
15,013
|
|
|
380,663
|
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President Marine Systems
|
|
2019
|
|
253,895
|
|
|
92,752
|
|
|
15,980
|
|
|
362,627
|
|
|
Mark A. Cox
|
|
2020
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
37,481
|
|
|
10,164
|
|
|
251,645
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President Finance and Accounting
|
|
2019
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
37,101
|
|
|
10,010
|
|
|
247,111
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
This column includes the grant date fair value of the option awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2019 and 2020, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and determined without regard to estimated forfeitures. These amounts reflect our accounting valuation of these awards, and do not correspond to any actual value that may be recognized by our Named Executive Officers. The assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are discussed in Note 17 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020. The fiscal 2020 option awards were granted on July 23, 2019 to Messrs. Capps, Malden and Cox. The fiscal 2019 option awards were granted on July 12, 2018 to Messrs. Capps, Malden and Cox. See “Executive Compensation--Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table--Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives” for a description of the material features of the option awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2019 and 2020.
|
|
(2)
|
The amounts reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020 consist of the following:
|
|
Name
|
|
Life
Insurance
Premiums
|
|
Automobile
Costs
(a)
|
|
401(k)
Matching
Contributions
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Robert P. Capps
|
|
2,004
|
|
—
|
|
11,253
|
|
13,257
|
|
Guy Malden
|
|
2,004
|
|
2,131
|
|
10,878
|
|
15,013
|
|
Mark A. Cox
|
|
2,004
|
|
—
|
|
8,160
|
|
10,164
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Automobile costs reflect the aggregate incremental cost to us of Mr. Malden's personal use of a company-owned automobile during fiscal 2020
|
|
•
|
the responsibilities of the officer;
|
|
•
|
the period over which the officer has performed these responsibilities;
|
|
•
|
the scope, level of expertise and experience required for the officer’s position;
|
|
•
|
the strategic impact of the officer’s position;
|
|
•
|
the potential future contribution and demonstrated individual performance of the officer; and
|
|
•
|
the general economic environment in which we are currently operating.
|
|
•
|
we are not the surviving entity in any merger, consolidation or other reorganization with (or we survive only as a subsidiary of) an entity other than a previously wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company;
|
|
•
|
we sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of our assets to a third party;
|
|
•
|
we dissolve or liquidate the Company;
|
|
•
|
any person or entity acquires ownership of our securities which represent 35% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding securities entitled to vote in the election of directors; or
|
|
•
|
a change in the composition of our Board where less than the majority of the directors are “incumbent directors.” An “incumbent director” is any director as of the date the Plan was adopted or, generally, any director who is elected to our Board after such time by the vote of at least a majority of the directors in place at the time of the Plan’s adoption.
|
|
•
|
Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.
Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in our medical, dental, vision, disability insurance and life insurance programs to meet their health and welfare needs. This is a fixed component of compensation, and the same benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to all of our employees in the U.S. In addition, our Named Executive Officers participate in our 401(k) retirement plan, which is available to all of our employees in the U.S. These benefits are provided to assure that we are able to maintain a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining officers and other employees.
|
|
•
|
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits.
We believe that the total mix of compensation and benefits provided to our Named Executive Officers is competitive, and perquisites should generally not play a large role in such officers’ total compensation. As a result, the perquisites and other personal benefits we provide to our Named Executive Officers are limited. We provide certain Named Executive Officers who are required as part of their job duties to drive considerable distances in order to visit existing and potential customers with the use of a company-owned automobile.
|
|
•
|
“cause” is deemed to exist if an executive: (1) engages in fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, theft or embezzlement against the Company or its affiliates, (2) willfully refuses to perform his duties, (3) materially breaches the confidentiality, non-competition or non-solicitation obligations under his employment agreement, (4) is convicted of, or pleads guilty to, a felony or crime involving moral turpitude, (5) engages in willful misconduct or gross negligence in the performance of his duties that could have a material adverse effect on the Company or, (6) materially breaches and violates the Companies policies pertaining to sexual harassment, discrimination or insider trading.
|
|
•
|
“good reason” is defined as: (1) a material reduction in the executive’s position, responsibilities or duties, (2) relocation of the geographic location of the executive’s place of employment by more than 50 miles, or (3) a material breach by the Company of any provision of the employment agreement; and
|
|
•
|
A “disability” will exist if the applicable executive is entitled to receive long-term disability benefits under the Company's disability plan.
|
|
•
|
Increased the base salaries of Messrs Capps and Malden by restoring a 15% base salary reduction that had been enacted in June 1, 2015.
|
|
•
|
Established minimum performance criteria for any cash bonuses related to fiscal 2020, which were not attained and resulted in no cash bonuses being paid for fiscal 2020.
|
|
•
|
Did not grant “full value” stock awards to Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2020.
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|||||||||
|
Name
|
|
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options Exercisable (#)
|
|
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options Unexercisable (#)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|||
|
Robert P. Capps
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
|
5/27/2020
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
5/27/2025
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
1/12/2026
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
30,000
(1)
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
|
2/15/2027
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
33,334
(3)
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
7/12/2028
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50,000
(4)
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
7/23/2029
|
|
Guy Malden
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
|
5/27/2020
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
5/27/2025
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
1/12/2026
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
30,000
(1)
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
|
2/15/2027
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
33,334
(3)
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
7/12/2028
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50,000
(4)
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
7/23/2029
|
|
Mark A. Cox
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
10,000
(2)
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
2/22/2027
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
|
|
13,334
(3)
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
7/12/2028
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,000
(4)
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
7/23/2029
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The remaining unexercisable stock options granted on February 15, 2017 became exercisable as of February 15, 2020.
|
|
(2)
|
The remaining unexercisable stock options granted on February 22, 2017 became exercisable as of February 22, 2020.
|
|
(3)
|
The unexercisable stock options granted on July 12, 2018 will become exercisable as follows so long as the applicable executive remains employed through the applicable vesting date: one-half on July 12, 2020; and one-half on July 12, 2021.
|
|
(4)
|
The unexercisable stock options granted on July 23, 2019 will become exercisable as follows so long as the applicable executive remains employed through the applicable vesting date: one-third on July 23, 2020; one-third on July 23, 2021; and one-third on July 23, 2022.
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash
|
|
Stock Awards
(1)
|
|
Option Awards
(2)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Peter H. Blum, Non-Executive Chairman
|
|
125,000
|
|
59,700
|
|
89,149
|
|
273,849
|
|
Robert J. Albers
|
|
93,500
|
|
21,890
|
|
35,660
|
|
151,050
|
|
Thomas S. Glanville
|
|
71,000
|
|
21,890
|
|
35,660
|
|
128,550
|
|
Marcus Rowland
|
|
53,500
|
|
21,890
|
|
35,660
|
|
111,050
|
|
William H. Hilarides
|
|
60,000
|
|
21,725
|
|
70,381
|
|
152,106
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
This column includes the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to our non-employee directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and determined without regard to estimated forfeitures. These amounts reflect our accounting valuation of these awards. The assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are discussed in Note 17 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020. The 2020 stock awards were granted on July 29, 2019 to Messrs. Blum, Albers, Glanville and Rowland, and on August 21, 2019 to Mr. Hilarides.
|
|
(2)
|
This column includes the grant date fair value of the option awards to our non-employee directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and determined without regard to estimated forfeitures. These amounts reflect our accounting valuation of these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by our non-employee directors. The assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are discussed in Note 17 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020. The 2020 option awards were granted on July 29, 2019 to Messrs. Blum, Albers, Glanville and Rowland, and on August 21, 2019 to Mr. Hilarides. As of January 31, 2020, Messrs. Blum, Hilarides, Albers, Glanville and Rowland held a total of 153,000, 40,000, 121,000, 113,000 and 113,000 unexercised stock options, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2020
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Annual retainers:
|
|
|
|
Non-executive chairman
|
|
50,000
|
|
Member of Audit Committee
|
|
7,500
|
|
Chairman of Audit Committee
|
|
8,500
|
|
Member of Compensation Committee
|
|
5,000
|
|
Chairman of Compensation Committee
|
|
6,000
|
|
Member of Nominating Committee
|
|
4,000
|
|
Chairman of Nominating Committee
|
|
4,000
|
|
Member of Strategic Planning Committee
|
|
10,000
|
|
Chairman of Strategic Planning Committee
|
|
30,000
|
|
Each Board meeting attended
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
(1)
|
The affairs of the Company will cease to be governed by Texas corporation laws and will become subject to Delaware corporation laws. See “Comparison of Shareholder Rights Before and After the Reincorporation” below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The legal existence of the Company as a separate Texas corporation will cease and MIND Technology will continue with all of the rights, titles and interests of the Company, will continue with the same officers and directors of the Company, the rights of creditors of the Company will continue to exist as creditors of MIND Technology, and the shareholders of the Company will be the stockholders of MIND Technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Each outstanding share of our Common Stock will automatically be converted into one share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of MIND Technology (“MIND Technology Common Stock”).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Each outstanding option to purchase our common stock will automatically be converted into an option to purchase an identical number of shares of MIND Technology Common Stock at the same option price per share and upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions set forth in the applicable plan and related award agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
MIND Technology Common Stock will become issuable upon the vesting of the Company’s existing restricted shares and awards of restricted stock units upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions set forth in the applicable plan and related award agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Each outstanding share of our preferred stock will automatically be converted into one share of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, of MIND Technology (“MIND Technology Preferred Stock”).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Our ticker symbols “MIND” and “MINDP” will remain unchanged as a result of the Reincorporation, and the MIND Technology Common Stock and MIND Technology Preferred Stock will trade under those respective symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
All of the Company’s employee benefit and incentive plans and arrangements will be assumed by MIND Technology upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions set forth in such plans and arrangements as before the Reincorporation.
|
|
•
|
the ability to raise capital by issuing capital stock under the type of transactions described above, or other financing transactions; and
|
|
•
|
the availability of shares to pursue business expansion opportunities, if any.
|
|
•
|
The issuance of authorized but unissued stock could be used to deter a potential takeover of our Company that may otherwise be beneficial to shareholders by diluting the shares held by a potential suitor or issuing shares to a shareholder that will vote in accordance with our Board’s desires. A takeover may be beneficial to independent shareholders because, among other reasons, a potential suitor may offer such shareholders a premium for their shares of stock compared to the then-existing market price.
|
|
•
|
Shareholders do not have any preemptive or similar rights to subscribe for or purchase any additional shares of common stock or preferred stock that may be issued in the future, and therefore, future issuances of common stock or preferred
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Business Combinations Statute
|
|
Unless its original certificate of incorporation provides that Section 203 does not apply to the corporation, DGCL Section 203 prohibits certain business combinations between a Delaware corporation and an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the time the interested stockholder acquired its stock.
“Interested stockholder” is broadly defined as a person (including the affiliates and associates of such person) that is directly or indirectly a beneficial owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation.
Business combinations include: (i) certain mergers and consolidations, (ii) sales, leases, exchanges, mortgages, pledges, transfers or other dispositions of assets having an aggregate market value of 10% or more of either the consolidated assets or the outstanding stock of a company, and (iii) certain transactions that would result in the issuance or transfer of stock of a company, increase the interested stockholder’s proportionate share of ownership in a company, or grant the interested stockholder disproportionate financial benefits.
The DGCL provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the business combination or the transaction in which the stockholder became an interested stockholder is approved by that company’s board of directors prior to the time the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, (ii) the interested stockholder acquired at least 85% of the voting stock of that company in the transaction in which it became an interested stockholder, or (iii) the business combination is approved by a majority of the board of directors and the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by disinterested stockholders at an annual or annual meeting (and not by written consent).
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation does not opt out of Section 203 opt out of Section 203.
|
|
Unless its articles of incorporation provide otherwise, the TBOC prohibits Texas public corporations from entering into certain (i) mergers, share exchanges and conversions, (ii) sales of assets, reclassifications and other transactions sales or other dispositions of assets having an aggregate market value of 10% or more of (a) the aggregate market value of the consolidated assets of a company, (b) the aggregate market value of the outstanding stock of a company or (c) the earning power or net income of a company on a consolidated basis, (iii) transactions that would result in the issuance or transfer of shares of a company to an affiliated shareholder, increase the affiliated shareholder’s proportionate share of ownership in a company or grant the affiliated shareholder disproportionate financial benefits, and (iv) liquidation proposals with an “affiliated shareholder” for a period of three years after the date the shareholder obtained “affiliated shareholder” status.
“Affiliated shareholder” is defined as a person who beneficially owns (or has owned within the preceding three-year period) 20% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a Texas public corporation.
The TBOC provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the board of directors of the corporation approves the transaction or the acquisition of shares by the affiliated shareholder prior to the affiliated shareholder becoming an affiliated shareholder, or (ii) the board of directors and two-thirds (or higher if specified in the articles of incorporation) of the unaffiliated shareholders approve the transaction at a meeting held no earlier than six months after the shareholder acquires such ownership.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws do not address this issue.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Sales, Leases, Exchanges or Other Dispositions
|
|
A Delaware corporation may sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of its property and assets when and as authorized by the board of directors and by a majority in voting power of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon, but the certificate of incorporation may provide for a greater vote.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for a greater vote.
|
|
Generally, the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, of the property and assets of a Texas corporation requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the corporation entitled to vote. No such approval is required, however, if the transaction is made in the usual and regular course of the corporation’s business. Under Texas law, the transfer of substantially all of a corporation’s assets in such a manner that the corporation continues directly or indirectly to engage in one or more businesses is deemed to be in the usual and regular course of its business.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws do not address this issue.
|
|
Approval of Mergers
|
|
Subject to certain exceptions, under Delaware law, mergers must be approved by the stockholders. When stockholder approval is required, the vote required is a majority in voting power of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon, but the certificate of incorporation may provide for a greater vote of the corporation’s stockholders.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for a greater vote.
|
|
Under Texas law, any merger with a third party requires approval by two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Texas corporation unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the articles of incorporation.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws do not set forth a different approval standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Appraisal Rights
|
|
Under Delaware law, subject to exceptions for certain mergers and consolidations, stockholders who do not vote in favor of a merger or consolidation and otherwise comply with applicable statutory provisions are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with such merger or consolidation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, appraisal rights are not available in the event of a merger or consolidation of the corporation if the stock of the Delaware corporation is listed on a national securities exchange (the Company currently meets this condition by virtue of its listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market) or if such stock is held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders. Even if appraisal rights would not otherwise be available under Delaware law in the cases described above, stockholders would still have appraisal rights if they are required by the terms of the agreement of merger and consolidation to accept for their stock anything other than:
(1) shares of stock of the surviving corporation or resulting corporation or depository receipts in respect thereof;
(2) shares of stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, of any other corporation which shares (or depository receipts) at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders;
(3) cash in lieu of fractional shares or depository receipts; or
(4) a combination of such shares or depository receipts and such cash in lieu of fractional shares or depository receipts.
Under Delaware law, any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights will also be available as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation, or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation.
|
|
Except for the limited classes of mergers, consolidations, sales and asset dispositions for which no shareholder approval is required under Texas law, shareholders of Texas corporations with voting rights have dissenters’ rights in the event of a merger, consolidation, conversion, sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, the property and assets of the corporation. However, a shareholder of a Texas corporation has no dissenters’ rights with respect to any plan or merger or conversion in which there is a single surviving or new domestic or foreign corporation, or with respect to any plan of exchange if:
(1) the ownership interest, or a depository receipt in respect of the ownership interest, held by the owner is part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are, on the record date set for purposes of determining which owners are entitled to vote on the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate:
(A) listed on a national securities exchange (the Company currently meets this condition by virtue of its listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market); or
(B) held of record by at least 2,000 owners;
(2) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration that is different from the consideration to be provided to any other holder of an ownership interest of the same class or series as the ownership interest held by the owner, other than cash instead of fractional shares or interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; and
(3) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration other than:
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation does not include such a provision.
|
|
(A) ownership interest, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, of another entity of the same general organizational type that, immediately after the effective date of the merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, will be part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect ownership interests, that are: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or authorized for listing on the exchange on official notice of issuance; (ii) held of record by at least 2,000 owners; (B) cash instead of fractional ownership interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; or (C) any combination of the ownership interests and cash above.
|
|
Shareholder Consent to Action Without a Meeting
|
|
Under Delaware law, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, any action that can be taken at a meeting of the stockholders can be taken without such meeting if written consent thereto is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having the minimum number of votes necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were presented and voted.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation does not prohibit action by written consent. The Proposed Delaware Bylaws require stockholders acting by written consent to give the company advance notice that they intend to do so.
|
|
Under Texas law, any action that may be taken at a meeting of the shareholders may be taken without a meeting if written consent thereto is signed by all the holders of shares entitled to vote on that action. The articles of incorporation of a Texas corporation may provide that action by written consent in lieu of a meeting may be taken by the holders of that number of votes which would be required to take the action which is the subject of the consent at a meeting at which each of the shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation allow action by one or more written consents if such consent or consents, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holder or holders of shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at which the holders of all shares entitled to vote on the action were presented and voted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Procedures for Filling Vacant Directorships
|
|
Under Delaware law, unless the certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware Bylaws provide that a vacancy may be filled by (a) the vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon or (ii) the vote of a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum of the board of directors. This is consistent with the existing Texas Articles of Incorporation.
|
|
Under Texas law, any vacancy occurring in the board of directors may, unless otherwise authorized by a corporation’s articles of incorporation, fill a vacancy or a newly created vacancy in a director position only: (i) by the affirmative vote of the majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, (ii) by the sole remaining director, or (iii) by the affirmative vote of the shareholders.
A directorship to be filled because of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by the shareholders or by the board of directors for a term of office continuing only until the next election of one or more directors by the shareholders. The board of directors may not fill more than two such directorships during the period between any two successive annual meetings of shareholders.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation provide that a vacancy may be filled by (a) the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon at an annual or special meeting of shareholders called for that purpose, or (b) a majority of the remaining directors though less than a quorum of the board of directors.
|
|
Right to Call Meetings
|
|
Delaware law provides that meetings, including annual meetings, of the stockholders may be called by the board of directors or such other persons as are authorized in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation and the Delaware Bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, special meetings of the stockholders may be called by a majority of the board of directors at any time, and are required to be called upon the written request of the holders of 10% of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding stock, consistent with the Texas law requirement.
|
|
Unless otherwise specified in the corporation’s articles of incorporation holders of not less than 10% of all of the shares entitled to vote at the proposed meeting have the right to call a special shareholders’ meeting. The articles of incorporation may allow for annual meetings to be called by a number of shares greater than or less than 10%, but it may not set the required number of shares above 50%. The president, board of directors, or any other person authorized to call annual meetings by the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation may also call special shareholders’ meetings.
The existing Texas Bylaws provide that special meetings of shareholders may be called by the president or the board of directors any time, and are required to be called upon the request of the holder(s) of not less than 10% of the outstanding shares of the Company entitled to vote at the meeting.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Voting by Proxy
|
|
Under Delaware law, a stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder by proxy. A proxy shall not be voted or acted upon after three years from its date, unless the proxy provides for a longer period.
|
|
Under Texas law, a shareholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such shareholder by proxy. A proxy is only valid for eleven months from its date unless otherwise provided in the proxy.
|
|
Charter Amendments
|
|
Delaware law provides that amendments to the certificate of incorporation must be approved by the board of directors and thereafter by holders of a majority in voting power of the corporation’s stock entitled to vote thereon, and a majority in voting power of each class entitled to a separate class vote, unless the certificate of incorporation provides for a greater vote. A separate class vote is provided for amendments to the certificate of incorporation changing the number of authorized shares of a class of stock (unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise), changing the par value of a class of stock, or adversely affecting the rights, powers and preferences of the class of stock.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation does not alter the approval requirement for amendments under Delaware law.
|
|
Under Texas law, an amendment to the articles of incorporation requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the corporation, unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the articles of incorporation.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation do not alter the approval requirement for amendments under Texas law.
|
|
Bylaw Amendments
|
|
Under Delaware law, stockholders of a corporation entitled to vote have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws. If the corporation’s certificate of incorporation so provides, the corporation’s board of directors may also have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws.
The proposed Delaware Bylaws provide that the bylaws may be amended, repealed, altered or adopted (i) by stockholder action with the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all the shares entitled to vote thereon or (ii) by the board of directors.
|
|
Generally, under Texas law, the board of directors may amend, repeal or adopt a corporation’s bylaws. However, a corporation’s articles of incorporation may reserve this power exclusively to a majority of the shareholders. Similarly, the shareholders, in amending, repealing or adopting a particular bylaw, may expressly provide that the board of directors may not amend, readopt or repeal that bylaw. Texas case law permits the corporation to increase the required threshold of shareholders necessary to amend the bylaws.
The existing Texas Bylaws allow for amendments of the Texas Bylaws by the Board, subject to amendment, repeal or adoption of new bylaws by action of the shareholders and unless the shareholders in amending, repealing or adopting a particular bylaw expressly provide that the board of directors may not amend or repeal such bylaw.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
Under Delaware law, subject to the exceptions discussed below, a holders of a majority in voting power of the corporation’s capital stock entitled to vote at an election of directors may remove a director with or without cause.
If the board of directors of a Delaware corporation is classified (i.e., elected for staggered terms), a director may only be removed for cause, unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.
If a corporation uses cumulative voting and less than the entire board is to be removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes cast against his or her removal would be sufficient to elect him or her if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of directors. Where a corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides that separate classes or series of stockholders are entitled, as such a class or series, to elect separate directors, in calculating the sufficiency of votes for removal of such a director, only the votes of the holders of such a class or series are considered.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation allow the removal of directors with or without cause and with the approval of at least majority of the voting power of all the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote thereon.
|
|
Under Texas law, subject to the exceptions discussed below or as otherwise provided by the articles of incorporation or bylaws of a corporation, the shareholders may remove a director, with or without cause, by a vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at an election of the directors.
If the corporation’s directors serve staggered terms, a director may not be removed except for cause unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise.
If the articles of incorporation permit cumulative voting and less than the entire board is to be removed, a director may not be removed if the votes cast against the removal would be sufficient to elect him or her if cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of directors. Where a corporation’s articles of incorporation provides that separate classes or series of shareholders are entitled, as such a class or series, to elect separate directors, in calculating the sufficiency of votes for removal of such a director, only the votes of the holders of such a class or series are considered.
The existing Texas Bylaws provide that directors may be removed at a meeting of shareholders duly called for the purpose of removal by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors or by unanimous written consent of the shareholders without a meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Directors
|
|
Delaware law provides that the number of directors will be fixed by, or in the manner provided in, the bylaws, unless the certificate of incorporation fixes the number of directors, in which case the number of directors may be changed only by amendment of the certificate of incorporation.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation and the Delaware Bylaws provide that
the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time exclusively pursuant to a resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board.
|
|
Texas law provides that, after specifying the initial number of directors in the articles of incorporation, the number of directors will be set by or in the manner provided in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws.
The existing Texas Bylaws provide that the size of the board will be determined by the board of directors.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Inspection of Books and Records
|
|
Under Delaware law, any stockholder may inspect the corporation’s books and records upon written demand under oath stating the purpose of the inspection. If the corporation refuses to permit inspection or does not reply to the demand within five business days after the demand has been made, the stockholder may apply to the Court of Chancery for an order to compel such inspection.
|
|
Under Texas law, a shareholder may, upon written demand stating a proper purpose, inspect the books and records of a corporation if such shareholder holds at least 5% of the outstanding shares of stock of the corporation or has been a holder of shares for at least six months prior to such demand.
|
|
Distributions and Dividends
|
|
Under Delaware law, a corporation may, subject to any restrictions contained in its certificate of incorporation, pay dividends out of surplus and, if there is not surplus, out of net profits for the current and/or the preceding fiscal year, unless the capital of the corporation is less than the capital represented by issued and outstanding stock having preferences on asset distributions.
The proposed Delaware Bylaws provide that dividends may be declared as provided by law.
|
|
Under Texas law, a distribution is defined as a transfer of cash or other property (except a corporation’s own shares or rights to acquire its shares), or an issuance of debt, by a corporation to its shareholders in the form of: (i) a dividend on any class or series of the corporation’s outstanding shares, (ii) a purchase or redemption, directly or indirectly, of its shares, or (iii) a payment in liquidation of all or a portion of its assets.
Under Texas law, a corporation may not make a distribution if such distribution violates its articles of incorporation or, unless the corporation is in receivership, if it either renders the corporation unable to pay its debts as they become due in the course of its business or affairs, or exceeds, depending on the type of distribution, either the net assets or the surplus of the corporation.
The existing Texas Bylaws provide that distributions may be made as provided by law.
|
|
Stock Redemption and Repurchase
|
|
Under Delaware law, a corporation may purchase or redeem shares of any class except when its capital is impaired or would be impaired by such purchase or redemption. A corporation may, however, purchase or redeem out of capital, shares that are entitled upon any distribution of its assets to a preference over another class or series of its stock, or, if no shares entitled to such a preference are outstanding, any of its own shares, if such shares are to be retired and the capital reduced.
|
|
As noted above, under Texas law, the purchase or redemption by a corporation of its shares constitutes a distribution. Accordingly, any such purchase or redemption is subject to the restrictions on distributions discussed above.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
|
|
The DGCL permits a corporation to indemnify present or former directors, officers, employees and agents and persons serving at the request of the corporation as officers, directors, employees or agents of another entity or employee benefit plan against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, excise taxes and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with an action, suit or proceeding, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, to which such indemnifiable person may be a party, provided such indemnifiable person shall have acted in good faith and in a manner such person shall have reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and in the case of a criminal proceeding, such person had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful. The termination of an action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or plea of nolo contendere does not, of itself, create a presumption that the applicable standard of conduct has not been met.
In connection with an action by or in the right of the corporation against an indemnifiable person, the corporation has the power to indemnify such person for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such suit (a) if such person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, but (b) if such person is found liable to the corporation, only if ordered by a court of law. The DGCL does not authorize indemnification of judgments, fines, excise taxes or amounts paid in settlement in derivative actions.
The DGCL provides that such section is not exclusive of any other indemnification rights, which may be granted by a corporation to its indemnifiable persons, but under Delaware law such person’s conduct must generally meet the standard of conduct required by the DGCL.
The DGCL also permits a corporation to pay in advance the expenses incurrence by directors and officers in defending a proceeding brought against them in their capacities as such.
The proposed Delaware Bylaws provide for indemnification of directors and officers (including advancement of expenses) to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
|
|
Texas law permits a corporation to indemnify a director or former director, against judgments and expenses reasonably and actually incurred by the person in connection with a proceeding if the person: (i) acted in good faith, (ii) reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in the person’s official capacity, that the person’s conduct was in the corporation’s best interests, and otherwise, that the person’s conduct was not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, and (iii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, did not have a reasonable cause to believe the person’s conduct was unlawful.
If, however, the person is found liable to the corporation, or is found liable on the basis he received an improper personal benefit, then indemnification under Texas law is limited to the reimbursement of reasonable expenses actually incurred and no indemnification will be available if the person is found liable for: (i) willful or intentional misconduct in the performance of the person’s duty to the corporation, (ii) breach of the person’s duty of loyalty owed to the corporation, or (iii) an act or omission not committed in good faith that constitutes a breach of a duty owed by the person to the corporation.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation provide for indemnification of directors (including advancement of expenses) to the extent permitted by applicable law.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Procedure for Indemnification
|
|
Delaware law provides that a determination that indemnification of a director or officer is appropriate must be made: (i) by a majority vote of directors who are not party to the proceeding, even though less than a quorum, (ii) by a committee of such directors designated by majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum, (iii) if there are no such directors or if such directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (iv) by stockholder vote.
The proposed Delaware Bylaws do not address this issue.
|
|
Texas law provides that a determination that indemnification is appropriate must be made: (i) by a majority vote of the directors who, at the time of the vote, are disinterested and independent, regardless of whether such directors constitute a quorum, (ii) by a majority vote of a special committee of the board of directors if the committee is designated by a majority vote of the directors who at the time of the vote are disinterested and independent and is composed solely of one or more directors who are disinterested and independent, (iii) by special legal counsel selected by majority vote under (i) or (ii) above, (iv) by the shareholders in a vote that excludes those shares held by directors who, at the time of the vote, are not disinterested and independent, or (v) by a unanimous vote of the shareholders of the corporation.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation and Texas Bylaws do not address this issue.
|
|
Mandatory Indemnification
|
|
Delaware law requires indemnification for expenses actually and reasonably incurred with respect to any claim, issue or matter on which the director is successful on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding.
|
|
Under Texas law, indemnification by the corporation for reasonable expenses actually incurred is mandatory only if the director is wholly successful on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding.
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Delaware law allows a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in such a capacity or arising out of his status as such a person. This is so, regardless of whether the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against that liability.
Under Delaware law, a corporation may also establish and maintain arrangements, other than insurance, to protect such persons, including a trust fund or surety arrangement.
|
|
Texas law is substantially the same as Delaware law for this issue.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Persons Covered
|
|
Delaware law permits the same indemnification rights to officers, employees and agents that it provides for directors.
|
|
Texas law expressly and separately addresses the indemnification of officers, employees and agents. The corporation may indemnify and advance expenses to an officer, employee or agent as provided by the corporation’s governing documents, general or specific action of the board of directors, resolution of the shareholders, contract, or common law. The corporation must indemnify an officer to the same extent as a director. The procedure for indemnification under Texas law summarized above need not be followed for officers, employees or agents.
|
|
Limited Liability of Directors
|
|
Delaware law permits the adoption of a provision in the certificate of incorporation limiting or eliminating the monetary liability of a director to a corporation or its stockholders by reason of a director’s breach of the fiduciary duty of care.
Delaware law does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director for: (i) breaching the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) failing to act in good faith, (iii) engaging in intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iv) obtaining an improper personal benefit from the corporation, or (v) declaring an illegal dividend or approving an illegal stock purchase or redemption.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation eliminates the monetary liability of a director to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
|
|
Texas law permits a corporation to eliminate in its articles of formation all monetary liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for conduct in the performance of such director’s duties.
Texas law does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director for: (i) a breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders, (ii) an act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of the person to the corporation or involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) a transaction from which the director obtains an improper benefit, or (iv) a violation of applicable statutes which expressly provide for the liability of a director.
The existing Texas Articles of Incorporation eliminate the monetary liability of a director to the extent permitted by applicable law.
|
|
Fiduciary Duties of Directors
|
|
Delaware imposes duties of care and loyalty on directors of Delaware corporations. If not rebutted, the business judgment rule provides a presumption that a director acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the corporation. Delaware imposes liability upon directors who willfully or recklessly disregard their duties as directors so as to constitute an utter failure to carry out their fiduciary duties.
Directors of a Delaware corporation owe fiduciary duties both to the stockholders and the corporation.
|
|
Texas imposes duties of loyalty, care and obedience on directors of Texas corporations, but will generally not, absent fraud, impose liability upon a non-interested director unless the action challenged is outside of the expressed purpose of the corporation or inconsistent with an express limitation on authority.
Directors of a Texas corporation owe fiduciary duties only to the corporation.
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Texas
|
|
Shareholder Rights Plans
|
|
Delaware courts have generally allowed the use of shareholder rights plans by a corporation if their adoption is reasonable in response to a reasonably identified threat posed.
|
|
Texas statutorily approves shareholder rights plans.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Considerations of Directors
|
|
Delaware does not have a statute stating what constituencies the board may consider when making decisions.
|
|
Texas corporate law includes statutory approval of directors considering both the long-term and short-term interests of the corporation and the shareholders.
|
|
Shareholder Actions
|
|
Under Delaware law, stockholders can bring both derivate actions on behalf of the corporation and direct claims on their own behalf or on behalf of a class of stockholders directly injured by the board’s actions. With respect to derivative actions, stockholders must either make a demand on the board to bring the action itself or alleging demand futility. Generally, lawsuits alleging breaches of fiduciary duties brought in Delaware state court are tried in the Court of Chancery without a jury.
|
|
Texas generally requires that lawsuits against directors be brought derivatively by the corporation only after making demand on the corporation’s board setting out the contours of the demand. Texas law may, in certain circumstances, such as in a proceeding determining liability of directors, allow for a jury trial.
|
|
Forum Selection
|
|
Delaware law permits corporations to include in their certificates of incorporation or bylaws a provision that confers exclusive jurisdiction on the courts of Delaware as to any internal corporate claims, which include derivative claims that are based upon breach of duties of a director or stockholder in such capacity and other matters for which the DGCL confers jurisdiction upon the Delaware courts.
The proposed Delaware Certificate of Incorporation makes this election regarding the Chancery Court’s exclusive jurisdiction to the maximum extent allowable.
|
|
Texas law does not have an authorizing statutory provision similar to the forum selection provision in the DGCL.
The existing Texas Bylaws do not address forum selection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective
|
|
How Our Executive Compensation
Program Achieves This Objective
|
|
Providing a competitive compensation package that attracts, motivates and retains qualified and highly-skilled officers that are key to our long-term success
|
|
We analyze compensation packages provided to the officers of other companies in our industry and with whom we compete for executive talent. Based on this analysis, we attempt to provide a base compensation package that is competitive with those companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rewarding individual performance while ensuring a meaningful link between our operational performance and the total compensation received by our officers
|
|
We consider our overall financial performance and the performance of each individual when determining cash incentive awards, and did not pay annual cash bonus awards for fiscal 2020. A meaningful portion of incentive compensation consists of long-term equity awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoiding policies and practices that create risks that might have a material adverse effect on us
|
|
We do not award multi-year guaranteed bonuses or disproportionate equity grants that provide unlimited upside with no downside. We do not utilize specific performance metrics in determining compensation, other than setting a minimum EBITDA performance goal for payout of our fiscal 2020 cash bonuses, which was not attained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoiding the creation of an environment that might cause undue pressure to meet specific financial goals
|
|
We do not use specific prospective financial targets in determining compensation awards, other than setting a minimum EBITDA performance goal for payout of our fiscal 2020 cash bonuses, which was not attained.
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
||||
|
Audit fees
(1)
|
|
$
|
395,078
|
|
|
$
|
408,377
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
395,078
|
|
|
$
|
408,377
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and the review of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
|
|
•
|
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements contained in Mitcham Industries, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020 with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, Moss Adams LLP;
|
|
•
|
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required under the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission;
|
|
•
|
received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and discussed the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence with the firm; and
|
|
•
|
considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence.
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JULY 27, 2020.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020 are available at
www.viewproxy.com/MitchamIndustries/2020
|
|
|
|
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
|
|
|
|
(a Delaware corporation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
(a Texas corporation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
1.
|
The name of the Corporation is MIND Technology, Inc.
|
|
2.
|
The Corporation was originally incorporated under the same name and the original certificate of incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on [●], 2020 (the “
Original Certificate
”).
|
|
3.
|
This Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “
Certificate of Incorporation
”), which restates and integrates and also further amends the provisions of the Original Certificate was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and by the written consent of its sole stockholder in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
|
|
4.
|
The Original Certificate is hereby integrated, amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
|
|
|
|
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
2002 TIMBERLOCH PLACE, SUITE 400
THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380
|
VOTE BY INTERNET -
www.viewproxy.com/MitchamIndustries/2020
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During the meeting, go to
www.viewproxy.com/MitchamIndustries/2020
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-866-804-9616
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
|
||||||||||||
|
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
|
|||||||||||||
|
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
For
All
|
Withhold
All
|
For All
Except
|
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
1.
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.
Nominees:
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01) Peter H. Blum
02) Robert P. Capps
03) William H. Hilarides
04) Robert J. Albers
05) Thomas S. Glanville
06) Marcus Rowland
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
2.
|
APPROVAL OF REINCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY FROM THE STATE OF TEXAS TO THE STATE OF DELAWARE.
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
3.
|
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
4.
|
RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF MOSS ADAMS LLP AS MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JANUARY 31, 2021.
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
5
|
APPROVAL TO GRANT DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD TO ADJOURN THE ANNUAL MEETING IF NECESSARY TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES.
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
Date
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
Date
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JULY 27, 2020.
The Notice of Virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020 are available at
www.viewproxy.com/MitchamIndustries/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, JULY 27, 2020 AT 9:00 AM LOCAL TIME
The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert P. Capps and Peter H. Blum, and each of them, the attorneys and proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution to appear and to vote all of the shares of the common stock of Mitcham Industries, Inc. held of record by the undersigned on May 27, 2020 as if personally present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Monday, July 27, 2020, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, as designated on the reverse.
Each signatory to this proxy acknowledges receipt from Mitcham Industries, Inc. prior to execution of this proxy, of a notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and a proxy statement dated June 10, 2020.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. This proxy also delegates discretionary authority to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please see the accompanying proxy statement for additional details.
YOU ARE URGED TO DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO BE REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING. THIS PROXY MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAIL IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED OR ELECTRONICALLY VIA THE INTERNET AT
WWW.VIEWPROXY.COM/MITCHAMINDUSTRIES/2020 OR BY PHONE AT 1-866-804-9616.
(Continued and to be signed on reverse side)
|
|
No information found
* THE VALUE IS THE MARKET VALUE AS OF THE LAST DAY OF THE QUARTER FOR WHICH THE 13F WAS FILED.
| FUND | NUMBER OF SHARES | VALUE ($) | PUT OR CALL |
|---|
| DIRECTORS | AGE | BIO | OTHER DIRECTOR MEMBERSHIPS |
|---|
No information found
No Customers Found
No Suppliers Found
Price
Yield
| Owner | Position | Direct Shares | Indirect Shares |
|---|