MMS 10-Q Quarterly Report Dec. 31, 2010 | Alphaminr

MMS 10-Q Quarter ended Dec. 31, 2010

MAXIMUS, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 a11-1674_110q.htm 10-Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010

Commission File Number: 1-12997

MAXIMUS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia

54-1000588

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

11419 Sunset Hills Road

Reston, Virginia

20190

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(703) 251-8500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of January 31, 2011, there were 17,169,621 shares of the registrant’s common stock (no par value) outstanding.



Table of Contents

MAXIM US, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2010.

3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)

4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)

5

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

13

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

20

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

21

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

22

Item 2

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

22

Item 6.

Exhibits.

22

Signature.

23

Exhibit Index.

24

Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the terms “Company”, “we,” “us,” “our” and “MAXIMUS” refer to MAXIMUS, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

2



Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.

MAXIMUS, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

December 31,
2010

September 30,
2010

(unaudited)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

177,004

$

155,321

Restricted cash

4,966

4,182

Accounts receivable — billed, net of reserves of $2,088 and $1,845

114,586

136,260

Accounts receivable — unbilled

18,797

17,245

Income taxes receivable

8,559

4,149

Deferred income taxes

14,848

13,290

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

24,682

25,702

Total current assets

363,442

356,149

Property and equipment, at cost

119,423

115,740

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

(70,918

)

(66,867

)

Property and equipment, net

48,505

48,873

Capitalized software

38,537

35,648

Less accumulated amortization

(12,191

)

(10,933

)

Capitalized software, net

26,346

24,715

Deferred contract costs, net

7,320

6,708

Goodwill

72,189

71,251

Intangible assets, net

7,389

7,778

Deferred income taxes

425

1,844

Deferred compensation plan assets

8,878

8,317

Other assets, net

2,250

2,106

Total assets

$

536,744

$

527,741

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

53,638

$

49,200

Accrued compensation and benefits

29,626

40,807

Deferred revenue

53,286

58,070

Acquisition-related contingent consideration

1,000

923

Income taxes payable

8,260

7,120

Other accrued liabilities

7,038

7,934

Liabilities of discontinued operations

634

Total current liabilities

152,848

164,688

Deferred revenue, less current portion

3,761

4,083

Long-term debt

1,452

1,411

Acquisition-related contingent consideration, less current portion

2,300

2,138

Income taxes payable, less current portion

1,823

1,793

Deferred income tax liability

5,924

4,946

Deferred compensation plan liabilities

11,459

9,893

Total liabilities

179,567

188,952

Shareholders’ equity:

Common stock, no par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 27,612,647 and 27,487,725 shares issued and 17,164,447 and 17,174,141 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, at stated amount, respectively

360,198

352,696

Treasury stock, at cost;10,448,200 and 10,313,584 shares at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively

(367,733

)

(359,366

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

18,459

14,530

Retained earnings

346,253

330,929

Total shareholders’ equity

357,177

338,789

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$

536,744

$

527,741

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3



Table of Contents

MAXIMUS, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

Three Months
Ended December 31,

2010

2009

Revenue

$

214,114

$

203,320

Cost of revenue

158,155

151,145

Gross profit

55,959

52,175

Selling, general and administrative expenses

28,667

27,429

Legal and settlement expense

686

Operating income from continuing operations

27,292

24,060

Interest and other income, net

491

99

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

27,783

24,159

Provision for income taxes

10,196

9,559

Income from continuing operations

17,587

14,600

Discontinued operations, net of income taxes:

Loss from discontinued operations

(1,972

)

Loss on disposal

(105

)

Loss from discontinued operations

(105

)

(1,972

)

Net income

$

17,482

$

12,628

Basic earnings (loss) per share (Note 7):

Income from continuing operations

$

1.02

$

0.83

Loss from discontinued operations

(0.11

)

Basic earnings per share

$

1.02

$

0.72

Diluted earnings (loss) per share (Note 7):

Income from continuing operations

$

0.99

$

0.81

Loss from discontinued operations

(0.11

)

Diluted earnings per share

$

0.99

$

0.70

Dividends paid per share

$

0.12

$

0.12

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic

17,180

17,595

Diluted

17,710

18,039

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4



Table of Contents

MAXIMUS, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

Three Months
Ended December 31,

2010

2009

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$

17,482

$

12,628

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Loss from discontinued operations

105

1,972

Depreciation and amortization

5,232

4,540

Deferred income taxes

990

(8,492

)

Deferred interest income on note receivable

61

Non-cash equity based compensation

2,057

1,865

Change in assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable — billed

22,145

9,349

Accounts receivable — unbilled

(1,554

)

(2,327

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,041

1,042

Deferred contract costs

(580

)

479

Other assets

(1,284

)

(34

)

Accounts payable

3,948

587

Accrued compensation and benefits

(11,553

)

(2,035

)

Deferred revenue

(5,270

)

13,134

Income taxes

(3,470

)

14,867

Other liabilities

1,092

1,251

Cash provided by operating activities — continuing operations

30,381

48,887

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities — discontinued operations

(739

)

6,134

Cash provided by operating activities

29,642

55,021

Cash flows from investing activities:

Proceeds from note receivable

217

Purchases of property and equipment

(2,407

)

(3,938

)

Capitalized software costs

(2,298

)

(2,641

)

Cash used in investing activities — continuing operations

(4,705

)

(6,362

)

Cash used in investing activities — discontinued operations

Cash used in investing activities

(4,705

)

(6,362

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Employee stock transactions

4,329

1,004

Repurchases of common stock

(8,370

)

(8,661

)

Tax benefit due to option exercises and restricted stock units vesting

1,031

135

Cash dividends paid

(2,067

)

(2,118

)

Cash used in financing activities — continuing operations

(5,077

)

(9,640

)

Cash used in financing activities — discontinued operations

Cash used in financing activities

(5,077

)

(9,640

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

1,823

106

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

21,683

39,125

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

155,321

87,815

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$

177,004

$

126,940

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5



Table of Contents

MAXIMUS, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

In these Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, the terms the “Company”, “MAXIMUS”, “us”, “we”, or “our” refer to MAXIMUS, Inc. and its subsidiaries .

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

General

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. The balance sheet at September 30, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and the notes thereto at September 30, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years ended September 30, 2010, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19, 2010.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for accounting for contracts that contain more than one contract element. The revised guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of each contract element. The guidance also expands the required disclosures. The Company adopted this guidance for all multiple-element arrangements entered into or significantly modified after October 1, 2010. The effect of this new guidance was not significant.

6



Table of Contents

3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in goodwill for the three months ended December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

Health Services

Human Services

Total

Balance as of September 30, 2010

$

43,270

$

27,981

$

71,251

Foreign currency translation

221

717

938

Balance as of December 31, 2010

$

43,491

$

28,698

$

72,189

The following table sets forth the components of intangible assets (in thousands):

As of December 31, 2010

As of September 30, 2010

Cost

Accumulated
Amortization

Intangible
Assets, net

Cost

Accumulated
Amortization

Intangible
Assets, net

Technology-based intangible assets

$

7,270

$

3,777

$

3,493

$

7,160

$

3,654

$

3,506

Customer contracts and relationships

9,260

6,141

3,119

8,989

5,504

3,485

Non-compete arrangements

250

55

195

243

39

204

Trademark

640

58

582

622

39

583

Total

$

17,420

$

10,031

$

7,389

$

17,014

$

9,236

$

7,778

The intangible assets include $3.4 million of fully-amortized technology-based assets still in use by the Company. Excluding these assets, the Company’s intangible assets have a weighted average remaining life of 6.4 years, comprising 7.6 years for technology-based intangible assets, 4.7 years for customer contracts and relationships, 3.1 years for non-compete arrangements and 9.1 years for the trademark. Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $0.6 million. Future amortization expense is estimated as follows (in thousands):

Nine months ended September 30, 2011

$

1,572

Year ended September 30, 2012

1,164

Year ended September 30, 2013

1,085

Year ended September 30, 2014

720

Year ended September 30, 2015

697

Thereafter

2,151

Total

$

7,389

4. Fair Value Measurements

The Company is required to disclose the fair value of all assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement and the nature of the valuation techniques, including their classification within the fair value hierarchy, utilized by the Company in performing these measurements.

The FASB provides a fair value framework which requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (or inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1:

Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2:

Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

The Company’s financial assets subject to fair value measurements and the necessary disclosures are as follows (in thousands):

7



Table of Contents

Fair Value as of
December 31,

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2010 Using Fair
Value Hierarchy

Description

2010

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Current portion of acquisition-related contingent consideration

$

(1,000

)

$

$

$

(1,000

)

Acquisition-related contingent consideration, less current portion

(2,300

)

(2,300

)

Deferred compensation plan liabilities

(11,459

)

(11,459

)

The Company’s deferred compensation plan liabilities are valued using a market approach, utilizing the value of the underlying investments to identify the fair value. Changes in deferred compensation plan liabilities are recorded in the income statement within “Interest and other income, net”.

The Company’s only acquisition-related contingent consideration liability was incurred with the acquisition of DeltaWare Systems, Inc. in February 2010. The fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration liability was based on a probability-weighted approach derived from management’s own estimates of profitability and sales targets. During the current period, management’s estimates of DeltaWare’s future profitability have been revised, with the result that an additional charge was recognized in the period. Foreign currency translation adjustments were recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

The effect on the financial statements is summarized below (in thousands):

Acquisition-related contingent consideration

Current portion

Long-term portion

Total

Balance as of September 30, 2010

$

923

$

2,138

$

3,061

Additional estimated consideration

50

100

150

Foreign currency translation

27

62

89

Balance as of December 31, 2010

$

1,000

$

2,300

$

3,300

5. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including contract and employment claims, in the ordinary course of its business. The matters reported on below involve significant pending or potential claims against us.

In March 2009, a state Medicaid agency asserted a claim against MAXIMUS, related to a discontinued business line, in the amount of $2.3 million in connection with a contract MAXIMUS had through February 1, 2009 to provide Medicaid administrative claiming services to school districts in the state. MAXIMUS entered into separate agreements with the school districts under which MAXIMUS helped the districts prepare and submit claims to the state Medicaid agency which, in turn, submitted claims for reimbursement to the federal government. No legal action has been initiated. The state has asserted that its agreement with MAXIMUS requires the Company to reimburse the state for the amounts owed to the federal government. However, the Company’s agreements with the school districts require them to reimburse MAXIMUS for such payments and therefore MAXIMUS believes the school districts are responsible for any amounts disallowed by the state Medicaid agency or the federal government. Accordingly, the Company believes its exposure in this matter is limited to its fees associated with this work and that the school districts will be responsible for the remainder. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, MAXIMUS recorded a $0.7 million reduction of revenue reflecting the fees it earned under the contract. MAXIMUS has exited the federal healthcare claiming business and no longer provides the services at issue in this matter.

In August 2010, the Company received a draft audit report prepared on behalf of one of its former SchoolMAX customers. The SchoolMAX business line was sold as part of the divestiture of the MAXIMUS Education Systems division in 2008. The draft audit report recommends a refund of approximately $11.6  million primarily arising out of the alleged failure of MAXIMUS and the buyer of the division to observe the most favored customer pricing term of the contract. MAXIMUS believes the audit report is incorrect and that no amounts are owed as a refund. In February 2011, the client sent a letter to MAXIMUS and the buyer of the business initiating the dispute resolution process under the contract.  The client reiterated some of the audit issues previously identified and also raised a number of issues pertaining to services and products delivered under the contract.  The client alleges total damages in excess of $30 million.  MAXIMUS and the buyer plan to contest all of the client's claims.  The Company also believes that it is entitled to indemnification from the buyer of the business for claims pertaining to services and deliverables.

8



Table of Contents

Credit Facilities and Performance Bonds

The Company’s Revolving Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility, with SunTrust Bank as administrative agent, issuing bank and swingline lender, and a syndicate of other lenders (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility provides for a $35.0 million revolving line of credit commitment, which may be used (i) for revolving loans, (ii) for swingline loans, subject to a sublimit of $5.0 million, and (iii) to request the issuance of letters of credit on the Company’s behalf, subject to a sublimit of $25.0 million. The Company may request an increase in the commitment under the Credit Facility, such that the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility shall at no time exceed $75.0 million. The credit available under the Credit Facility may be used, among other purposes, to refinance the Company’s current indebtedness, to repurchase shares of the Company’s capital stock and to finance the ongoing working capital, capital expenditure, and general corporate needs of the Company. The Credit Facility matures on January 25, 2013, at which time all outstanding borrowings must be repaid and all outstanding letters of credit must have been terminated or cash collateralized. At December 31, 2010, letters of credit totaling $11.3 million were outstanding under the Credit Facility.

Subject to applicable conditions, the Company may elect interest rates on its revolving borrowings calculated by reference to (i) the prime lending rate as announced by SunTrust Bank (or, if higher, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% or the one-month adjusted LIBOR) (a Base Rate Borrowing ), or (ii) the reserve adjusted rate per annum equal to the offered rate for deposits in U.S. dollars for a one (1), two (2), three (3) or six (6) month period in the London Inter-Bank Market (a LIBOR Borrowing ), and, in each case, plus an applicable margin that is determined by reference to the Company’s then-current leverage ratio. For swingline borrowings, the Company will pay interest at the rate of interest for a one (1) month LIBOR Borrowing, plus the applicable margin, or at a rate to be separately agreed upon by the Company and the administrative agent.

The Credit Facility provides for the payment of specified fees and expenses, including commitment and letter of credit fees, and contains customary financial and other covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with all covenants in the amended Credit Facility as of December 31, 2010. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”) and are secured by substantially all of MAXIMUS’ and the Guarantors’ present and future tangible and intangible assets, including the capital stock of subsidiaries and other investment property.

The Company also has a loan agreement with the Atlantic Innovation Fund of Canada. This provides for a loan of up to 1.7 million Canadian Dollars, which must be used for specific technology-based research and development. The loan has no interest charge and is repayable in installments between 2012 and 2022. At December 31, 2010, $1.5 million (1.5 million Canadian Dollars) was outstanding under this agreement.

Certain contracts require us to provide a surety bond as a guarantee of performance. At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the Company had performance bond commitments totaling $31.3 million and $33.5 million, respectively. These bonds are typically renewed annually and remain in place until the contractual obligations have been satisfied. Although the triggering events vary from contract to contract, in general, we would only be liable for the amount of these guarantees in the event of default in our performance of our obligations under each contract, the probability of which we believe is remote.

Loss contract

During the period, the Company recorded a charge of $3.2 million on a fixed price contract. The Company has recorded a liability of $2.9 million related to the anticipated loss to be recorded on this contract. The revenue and profitability on this contract are based upon estimated costs to complete the project, which are inherently subject to risk. The contract is expected to be completed during the 2012 fiscal year.

9



Table of Contents

6. Legal and Settlement Expense

Legal and Settlement Expense consists of costs related to significant legal settlements, including future legal costs estimated to be incurred in connection with those matters.

Legal expenses of $686,000 for the three month period ended December 31, 2009 relate predominantly to costs incurred in resolving a dispute with one of the Company’s subcontractors. There were no comparative costs in the three month period ended December 31, 2010.

7. Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the components of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):

Three Months
Ended December 31,

2010

2009

Numerator:

Income from continuing operations

$

17,587

$

14,600

Loss from discontinued operations

(105

)

(1,972

)

Net income

$

17,482

$

12,628

Denominator:

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

17,180

17,595

Effect of dilutive securities:

Employee stock options and unvested restricted stock units

530

444

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

17,710

18,039

The calculation of dilutive securities did not exclude any of the Company’s vesting or exercisable stock options in either period shown.

8. Stock Repurchase Programs

Under resolutions adopted in July 2008 and September 2010, the Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, at management’s discretion, of up to an aggregate of $175.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The resolutions also authorize the use of option exercise proceeds for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. During the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company repurchased 136,153 and 186,801 common shares at a cost of $8.4 million and $8.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010, $118.6 million remained available for future stock repurchases.

10



Table of Contents

9. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income comprises net income plus changes in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments. The components of comprehensive income for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
December 31,

2010

2009

Net income

$

17,482

$

12,628

Foreign currency translation adjustments

3,929

1,083

Comprehensive income

$

21,411

$

13,711

10. Segment Information

The following table provides certain financial information for each of the Company’s business segments (in thousands):

Three Months Ended December 31,

2010

% (1)

2009

% (1)

Revenue:

Health Services

$

130,011

100

%

$

130,640

100

%

Human Services

84,103

100

%

72,680

100

%

Total

214,114

100

%

203,320

100

%

Gross profit:

Health Services

34,277

26.4

%

32,910

25.2

%

Human Services

21,682

25.8

%

19,265

26.5

%

Total

55,959

26.1

%

52,175

25.7

%

Selling, general, and administrative expense:

Health Services

15,454

11.9

%

15,402

11.8

%

Human Services

13,179

15.7

%

11,886

16.4

%

Corporate/other

34

NM

141

NM

Total

28,667

13.4

%

27,429

13.5

%

Operating income from continuing operations:

Health Services

18,823

14.5

%

17,508

13.4

%

Human Services

8,503

10.1

%

7,379

10.2

%

Corporate/other

(34

)

NM

(141

)

NM

Subtotal: Segment operating income

27,292

12.7

%

24,746

12.2

%

Legal and settlement expense

NM

(686

)

NM

Total

$

27,292

12.7

%

$

24,060

11.8

%


(1)

% of respective segment revenue.  Changes not considered meaningful are marked “NM”.

11



Table of Contents

11. Discontinued Operations

On September 30, 2010, the Company sold its ERP business for cash proceeds of $5.6 million, net of transaction costs of $0.7 million, and recognized a pre-tax loss on sale of less than $0.1 million. The Company had previously recognized a loss on sale of $1.3 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. During the current period, the Company identified additional liabilities which related to the ERP business. Accordingly, an additional pre-tax loss on sale of $0.2 million was recorded.

The Company’s losses during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 include an after-tax charge of $2.2 million related to the transfer of a single project back to the client.

The following table summarizes the operating results of the discontinued operations included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
December 31,

2010

2009

Revenue

$

$

6,971

Loss from operations before income taxes

$

$

(3,337

)

Benefit from income taxes

(1,365

)

Loss from discontinued operations

$

$

(1,972

)

Loss on disposal before income taxes

$

(168

)

$

Benefit from income taxes

(63

)

Loss on disposal

$

(105

)

$

Loss from discontinued operations

$

(105

)

$

(1,972

)

The following table summarizes the carrying values of the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010 (in thousands):

As of
September 30,
2010

Accounts payable

$

95

Accrued compensation and benefits

539

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

$

634

No assets or liabilities related to discontinued operations were included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010.

12. Subsequent Events

Dividend

On January 7, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 for each share of the Company’s common stock outstanding. The dividend is payable on February 28, 2011, to shareholders of record on February 15, 2011.

12



Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included both herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19, 2010.

Forward Looking Statements

From time to time, we may make forward-looking statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our confidence and strategies and our expectations about revenue, results of operations, profitability, current and future contracts, market opportunities, market demand or acceptance of our products and services. Any statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. The words “could,” “estimate,” “future,” “intend,” “may,” “opportunity,” “potential,” “project,” “will,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements may involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These risks are detailed in Exhibit 99.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

Business Overview

We provide business process outsourcing services to government health and human services agencies under our mission of Helping Government Serve the People. ® Our business is focused almost exclusively on administering government-sponsored programs such as Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), health care reform, welfare-to-work, Medicare, child support enforcement and other government programs. Founded in 1975, we are one of the largest pure-play health and human services administrative providers to governments in the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. We use our expertise, experience and advanced technological solutions to help government agencies run efficient, cost-effective programs and to improve program accountability, while enhancing the quality of services provided to program beneficiaries.

The Company is managed through two segments, Health Services and Human Services. The Health Services segment provides a variety of business process outsourcing and administrative support services, as well as consulting services for state, provincial and federal programs, such as Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare, and the British Columbia Health Insurance Program. The Human Services segment includes a variety of business process outsourcing, case management, job training, and support services for programs such as welfare-to-work programs, child support enforcement, K-12 special education, and other specialized consulting services.

13



Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Consolidated

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected statements of operations data:

Three Months Ended
December 31,

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2010

2009

Revenue

$

214,114

$

203,320

Gross profit

$

55,959

$

52,175

Selling, general and administrative expense

$

28,667

$

27,429

Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue

13.4

%

13.5

%

Legal and Settlement Expense

686

Operating income from continuing operations

$

27,292

$

24,060

Operating margin from continuing operations percentage

12.7

%

11.8

%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

$

27,783

$

24,159

Provision for income taxes

10,196

9,559

Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes

17,587

14,600

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

(105

)

(1,972

)

Net income

$

17,482

$

12,628

Basic earnings (loss) per share:

Income from continuing operations

$

1.02

$

0.83

Loss from discontinued operations

(0.11

)

Basic earnings per share

$

1.02

$

0.72

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:

Income from continuing operations

$

0.99

$

0.81

Loss from discontinued operations

(0.11

)

Diluted earnings per share

$

0.99

$

0.70

We discuss constant currency revenue information to provide a framework for assessing how our business performed excluding the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations. To provide this information, revenue from foreign operations is converted into United States Dollars using average exchange rates from the previous fiscal period.

We also discuss organic growth revenue information to provide a framework for assessing how the business performed excluding the effect of business combinations. To provide this information, revenue from recently acquired entities is removed.

Both constant currency and organic growth revenue information are non-GAAP numbers. We believe that these numbers provide a useful basis for assessing the Company’s performance. The presentation of these non-GAAP numbers is not meant to be considered in isolation, or as an alternative to revenue growth as a measure of performance.

Revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 increased 5.3% to $214.1 million. On a constant currency basis, the growth would have been 3.6%. Organic revenue growth was 4.1%. The principal driver of revenue growth was our international employment services business, which is reported within our Human Services segment.

14



Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A) consists of costs related to general management, marketing and administration. These costs include salaries, benefits, bid and proposal efforts, travel, recruiting, continuing education, employee training, non-chargeable labor costs, facilities costs, printing, reproduction, communications, equipment depreciation, intangible amortization, and legal expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business. SG&A as a percentage of revenue was 13.4% in the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with 13.5% in the same period in fiscal year 2010.

Operating income from continuing operations increased 13.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared to the comparative period in the prior year to $27.3 million. Excluding legal and settlement expense, operating income increased 10.3% compared to the same period last year. This was driven by growth in the international operations within the Human Services segment, profit margin expansion in the Health Services segment and the benefits of favorable exchange rates on foreign-sourced income.

Legal and settlement expense consists of costs, net of reimbursed insurance claims, related to significant legal settlements and non-routine legal matters, including future probable legal costs estimated to be incurred in connection with those matters. Legal expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business are included in selling, general and administrative expense. The charge for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 relates to costs incurred in resolving a dispute with one of the Company’s subcontractors. There were no comparable costs in the current quarter.

The provision for income taxes in the quarter ended December 31, 2010 was $10.2 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 36.7%. The comparative charge in the quarter ended December 31, 2009 was $9.6 million, an effective rate of 39.6%. The decline in taxation rates year-over-year has reflected the increase in business and profitability in jurisdictions outside the United States which currently have lower tax rates.

Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes, was $17.6 million, or $0.99 per diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2010, compared with $14.6 million, or $0.81 per diluted share, for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The increase is caused by the growth of the business, particularly in jurisdictions with lower tax rates than the United States, and the absence of legal and settlement charges in the current period.

Health Services

Three Months Ended
December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

2010

2009

Revenue

$

130,011

$

130,640

Gross profit

34,277

32,910

Operating income

18,823

17,508

Operating margin percentage

14.5

%

13.4

%

Revenue decreased by 0.5%, for the three months ended December 31, 2010, compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010. Operating margin within the Health Services segment has improved from 13.4% in fiscal year 2010 to 14.5% in fiscal year 2011. The improvement in the current period was driven by the favorable timing of contracts and transaction-based revenue during the current quarter. The operating margin within the Health Services segment is susceptible to fluctuations as a result of changes in volumes, contract start-ups and program timing.

15



Table of Contents

Human Services

Three Months Ended
December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

2010

2009

Revenue

$

84,103

$

72,680

Gross profit

21,682

19,265

Operating income

8,503

7,379

Operating margin percentage

10.1

%

10.2

%

Revenues increased 15.7% for the three months ended December 31, 2010, compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010. On a constant currency basis, growth would have been 11.5%. Revenue growth was driven by international employment services businesses in Australia and the United Kingdom. These projects commenced around the beginning of fiscal year 2010 and were operating at full capacity during the quarter ended December 31, 2010.  These favorable results were partially tempered by cost growth of $3.2 million on a fixed price contract. The revenue and profitability on this contract are based upon estimated costs to complete the project, which are inherently subject to risk.

Operating margin in the three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was consistent at 10.1% and 10.2% respectively.

Discontinued Operations

On September 30, 2010, the Company sold its ERP business for cash proceeds of $5.6 million, net of transaction costs of $0.7 million, and recognized a pre-tax loss on sale of less than $0.1 million. The Company had previously recognized a loss on sale of $1.3 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. During the current period, the Company identified additional liabilities which related to the ERP business. Accordingly, an additional pre-tax loss on sale of $0.2 million was recorded.

The Company’s losses during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 include an after-tax charge of $2.2 million related to the transfer of a single project back to the client.

The following table summarizes the operating results of the discontinued operations included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
December 31,

2010

2009

Revenue

$

$

6,971

Loss from operations before income taxes

$

$

(3,337

)

Benefit from income taxes

(1,365

)

Loss from discontinued operations

$

$

(1,972

)

Loss on disposal before income taxes

(168

)

$

Benefit from income taxes

(63

)

Loss on disposal

(105

)

$

Loss from discontinued operations

$

(105

)

$

(1,972

)

At December 31, 2010, there are no assets or liabilities within the Company’s financial statements which are classified as discontinued operations. In completing the sale of the ERP business, the Company expects to receive payment from the acquirer following completion of certain due diligence (expected in the second quarter of the current fiscal year) and upon collection of certain customer receivables (expected prior to the fourth quarter of the current fiscal year). These balances currently total $3.9 million and are subject to confirmation from the acquirer.

16



Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Current Economic Environment

Within the United States, the current economic environment facing state and local governments continues to be challenging. Over the past few years, states have faced declining tax revenues, with increasing demand for critical services from the most vulnerable members of society. At the same time, states are generally required to balance their budgets each year. Certain states may delay payments to vendors as a result of budgetary constraints. In prior periods, the Company has faced short-term payment delays from state customers, all of which were ultimately recovered. The Company believes its liquidity and capital positions are adequate to weather short-term payment delays. In the event of more protracted delays, the Company may be required to seek additional capital sources, amend payment terms or take other actions. Extended payment delays could adversely affect the Company’s cash flows, operations and profitability.

The Company believes that demand for its services in its core areas of health and human services will remain strong, driven by the need for governments to fulfill Federal mandates and “do more with less”.

The situation for international governments is also challenging, with each of the areas in which MAXIMUS operates experiencing unique local issues in addition to general global economic factors. The United Kingdom has had recent changes in government leadership and is implementing austerity measures to deal with significant debt and other commitments. These measures may provide opportunities for service providers such as MAXIMUS.

Cash Flows

Three Months Ended
December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

2010

2009

Net cash provided by (used in):

Operating activities — continuing operations

$

30,381

$

48,887

Operating activities — discontinued operations

(739

)

6,134

Investing activities — continuing operations

(4,705

)

(6,362

)

Financing activities — continuing operations

(5,077

)

(9,640

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

1,823

106

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

$

21,683

$

39,125

Cash flows provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 was $30.4 million, compared with $48.9 million in the comparative quarter in fiscal year 2010. The decline was caused by: (1) $18.4 million in deferred revenue, primarily declines in advanced cash payments received from customers, principally in Australia and the United Kingdom; (2) $9.5 million of additional accrued compensation and benefits, the principal driver of which relates to the timing of annual bonus payments; and (3) $8.9 million of additional tax payments caused by the timing of payments to the federal and U.S. state governments. These cash outflows were offset by other significant cash inflows including: (1) $13.6 million of additional benefit from the receipt of funds for customers, which had been delayed at the fiscal year-end owing to budgetary constraints, and; (2) an increase in the profitability of the Company of $3.0 million.

Cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $0.7 million, compared to cash provided of $6.1 million for the same period in fiscal year 2010. In fiscal year 2010, the ERP division had made a number of accounting receivable collections. During the current quarter, the principal cash outflow related to the settlement of accounts payable and payroll liabilities which had not been transferred to the acquirer on the sale of the business.

Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $4.7 million, compared to $6.4 million for the same period in fiscal year 2010. The prior year cash outflow was principally driven by property and equipment purchases in Australia and the United Kingdom as part of the contract expansion in those locations.

17



Table of Contents

Cash used in financing activities from continuing operations for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $5.1 million, compared to $9.6 million for the same period in fiscal year 2010. This includes $8.4 million and $8.7 million of acquisitions of the Company’s own shares in the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and dividend payments of $2.1 million in both periods.  These cash outflows were offset by cash inflows related to the exercise of stock options in the period. Stock option exercises were significantly higher in the quarter ended December 31, 2010 than in the comparative quarter in fiscal year 2010, resulting in $3.3 million of additional cash inflows from the exercise of stock options and $0.9 million of related income tax benefits.

The Company’s cash balance was increased by $1.8 million in the current period owing to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. The principal driver of this change was the strengthening of the Australian Dollar against the United States Dollar.

To supplement our statements of cash flows presented on a GAAP basis, we use the non-GAAP measure of free cash flows from continuing operations to analyze the funds generated from operations. We believe free cash flow from continuing operations is a useful basis for comparing our performance with our competitors. The presentation of non-GAAP free cash flows from continuing operations is not meant to be considered in isolation, or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. We calculate free cash flow from continuing operations as follows:

Three Months Ended
December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

2010

2009

Cash provided by operating activities — continuing operations

$

30,381

$

48,887

Purchases of property and equipment

(2,407

)

(3,938

)

Capitalized software costs

(2,298

)

(2,641

)

Free cash flow from continuing operations

$

25,676

$

42,308

Repurchases of the Company’s common stock

Under resolutions adopted in July 2008 and September 2010, the Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, at management’s discretion, of up to an aggregate of $175.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The resolutions also authorize the use of option exercise proceeds for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. During the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company repurchased 136,153 and 186,801 common shares at a cost of $8.4 million and $8.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010, $118.6 million remained available for future stock repurchases.

Credit arrangements

The Company’s Revolving Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility, with SunTrust Bank as administrative agent, issuing bank and swingline lender, and a syndicate of other lenders (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility provides for a $35.0 million revolving line of credit commitment, which may be used (i) for revolving loans, (ii) for swingline loans, subject to a sublimit of $5.0 million, and (iii) to request the issuance of letters of credit on the Company’s behalf, subject to a sublimit of $25.0 million. The Company may request an increase in the commitment under the Credit Facility, such that the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility shall at no time exceed $75.0 million. The credit available under the Credit Facility may be used, among other purposes, to refinance the Company’s current indebtedness, to repurchase shares of the Company’s capital stock and to finance the ongoing working capital, capital expenditure, and general corporate needs of the Company. The Credit Facility matures on January 25, 2013, at which time all outstanding borrowings must be repaid and all outstanding letters of credit must have been terminated or cash collateralized. At December 31, 2010, letters of credit totaling $11.3 million were outstanding under the Credit Facility.

Subject to applicable conditions, the Company may elect interest rates on its revolving borrowings calculated by reference to (i) the prime lending rate as announced by SunTrust Bank (or, if higher, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% or the one-month adjusted LIBOR) (a Base Rate Borrowing ), or (ii) the reserve adjusted rate per annum equal to the offered rate for deposits in U.S. dollars for a one (1), two (2), three (3) or six (6) month period in the London Inter-Bank Market (a LIBOR Borrowing ), and, in each case, plus an applicable margin that is determined by reference to the Company’s then-current leverage ratio. For swingline borrowings, the Company will pay interest at the rate of interest for a one (1) month LIBOR Borrowing, plus the applicable margin, or at a rate to be separately agreed upon by the Company and the administrative agent.

18



Table of Contents

The Credit Facility provides for the payment of specified fees and expenses, including commitment and letter of credit fees, and contains customary financial and other covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. As we have limited obligations under the current Credit Facility and are currently recording annual net income that exceeds these obligations, the Company significantly exceeds all ratio requirements. The Company was in compliance with these and all other covenants as of December 31, 2010. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”) and are secured by substantially all of MAXIMUS’ and the Guarantors’ present and future tangible and intangible assets, including the capital stock of subsidiaries and other investment property.

The Company also has a loan agreement with the Atlantic Innovation Fund of Canada. This provides for a loan of up to 1.7 million Canadian Dollars, which must be used for specific technology-based research and development. The loan has no interest charge and is repayable in installments between 2012 and 2022. At December 31, 2010, $1.5 million (1.5 million Canadian Dollars) was outstanding under this agreement

Certain contracts require us to provide a surety bond as a guarantee of performance. At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the Company had performance bond commitments totaling $31.3 million and $33.5 million, respectively. These bonds are typically renewed annually and remain in place until the contractual obligations have been satisfied. Although the triggering events vary from contract to contract, in general, we would only be liable for the amount of these guarantees in the event of default in our performance of our obligations under each contract, the probability of which we believe is remote.

Other

Our working capital at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, calculated as the difference between current assets and current liabilities, was $210.6 million and $191.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $177.0 million and debt of $1.5 million. Management believes this liquidity and financial position, along with the revolving credit facility discussed above, provides sufficient liquidity to continue any contemplated stock repurchase program (depending on the price of the Company’s common stock), to pursue selective acquisitions, and to consider the continuation of dividends on a quarterly basis. Restricted cash represents amounts collected on behalf of certain customers and its use is restricted to the purposes specified under our contracts with these customers.

Under the provisions of certain long-term contracts, we may incur certain reimbursable transition period costs. During the transition period, these expenditures result in the use of our cash and in our entering into lease financing arrangements for a portion of the costs. Reimbursement of these costs may occur in the set-up phase or over the contract operating period. Related revenue may also be deferred during the set-up phase. As of December 31, 2010, $7.3 million in net costs had been incurred and reported as deferred contract costs on our consolidated balance sheet.

On January 7, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 for each share of the Company’s common stock outstanding. The dividend is payable on February 28, 2011, to shareholders of record on February 15, 2011.

We believe that we will have sufficient resources to meet our currently anticipated capital expenditure and working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.

19



Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates including those related to revenue recognition and cost estimation on certain contracts, the realizability of goodwill, and amounts related to income taxes, certain accrued liabilities and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We believe that we do not have material off-balance-sheet risk or exposure to liabilities that are not recorded or disclosed in our financial statements. While we have significant operating lease commitments for office space, those commitments are generally tied to the period of performance under related contracts. Additionally, although on certain contracts we are bound by performance bond commitments and standby letters of credit, we have not had any defaults resulting in draws on performance bonds. Also, we do not speculate in derivative transactions.

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, there were no significant changes to the critical accounting policies we disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for accounting for contracts that contain more than one contract element. The revised guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of each contract element. The guidance also expands the required disclosures. The Company adopted this guidance for all multiple-element arrangements entered into or significantly modified after October 1, 2010. The effect of this new guidance was not significant.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We believe that our exposure to market risk related to the effect of changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and other market risks with regard to instruments entered into for trading or for other purposes is immaterial.

There have been no material changes in the information presented in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010.

20



Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a)           Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time periods.

(b)           Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation of our internal control that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including contract and employment claims, in the ordinary course of its business. The matters reported on below involve significant pending or potential claims against us.

In March 2009, a state Medicaid agency asserted a claim against MAXIMUS, related to discontinued business line, in the amount of $2.3 million in connection with a contract MAXIMUS had through February 1, 2009 to provide Medicaid administrative claiming services to school districts in the state. MAXIMUS entered into separate agreements with the school districts under which MAXIMUS helped the districts prepare and submit claims to the state Medicaid agency which, in turn, submitted claims for reimbursement to the federal government. No legal action has been initiated. The state has asserted that its agreement with MAXIMUS requires the Company to reimburse the state for the amounts owed to the federal government. However, the Company’s agreements with the school districts require them to reimburse MAXIMUS for such payments and therefore MAXIMUS believes the school districts are responsible for any amounts disallowed by the state Medicaid agency or the federal government. Accordingly, the Company believes its exposure in this matter is limited to its fees associated with this work and that the school districts will be responsible for the remainder. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, MAXIMUS recorded a $0.7 million reduction of revenue reflecting the fees it earned under the contract. MAXIMUS has exited the federal healthcare claiming business and no longer provides the services at issue in this matter.

In August 2010, the Company received a draft audit report prepared on behalf of one of its former SchoolMAX customers. The SchoolMAX business line was sold as part of the divestiture of the MAXIMUS Education Systems division in 2008. The draft audit report recommends a refund of approximately $11.6  million primarily arising out of the alleged failure of MAXIMUS and the buyer of the division to observe the most favored customer pricing term of the contract. MAXIMUS believes the audit report is incorrect and that no amounts are owed as a refund. In February 2011, the client sent a letter to MAXIMUS and the buyer of the business initiating the dispute resolution process under the contract.  The client reiterated some of the audit issues previously identified and also raised a number of issues pertaining to services and products delivered under the contract.  The client alleges total damages in excess of $30 million.  MAXIMUS and the buyer plan to contest all of the client's claims.  The Company also believes that it is entitled to indemnification from the buyer of the business for claims pertaining to services and deliverables.

21



Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In connection with information set forth in this Form 10-Q, the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 should be considered. The risks included in the Form 10-K could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. There have been no material changes to the factors discussed in our Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(c) The following table sets forth the information required regarding repurchases of common stock that we made during the three months ended December 31, 2010:

Period

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

Average
Price Paid
per Share

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans (1)

Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Plan
(in thousands)

Oct. 1, 2010 — Oct. 31, 2010

$

$

123,926

Nov. 1, 2010 — Nov. 30, 2010

109,716

60.49

109,716

$

117,808

Dec. 1, 2010 — Dec. 31, 2010

26,437

65.56

26,437

$

118,623

Total

136,153

$

61.45

136,153


(1) Under resolutions adopted in July 2008 and September 2010, the Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, at management’s discretion, of up to an aggregate of $175.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The resolution also authorized the use of option exercise proceeds for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock.

Item 6. Exhibits.

The Exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed on the Exhibit Index immediately following the Signatures. The Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

22



Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

MAXIMUS, INC.

Date: February 8, 2011

By:

/s/ David N. Walker

David N. Walker

Chief Financial Officer

(On behalf of the registrant and as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

23



Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Section 906 Principal Executive Officer Certification.

32.2

Section 906 Principal Financial Officer Certification.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

24


TABLE OF CONTENTS