MMTRS 10-K Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended DECEMBER 31, 2012

Commission file number 000-02123

MILLS MUSIC TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 212- 525-1349

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b – 2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes x No

The aggregate market value of voting Trust Units held by non-affiliates as of the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $10,830,768.

Total Trust Units outstanding as of March 15, 2013 was 277,712.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

–1–

Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

NONE

–2–

Table of Contents

Organization and Background

Mills Music Trust (the “Trust”) was created by a Declaration of Trust dated December 3, 1964 (the “Declaration of Trust”), for the purpose of acquiring from Mills Music, Inc. (“Old Mills”), the rights to receive payment of a deferred contingent purchase price obligation (the “Contingent Portion”) payable to Old Mills. The obligation to pay the Contingent Portion arose as the result of the sale by Old Mills of its music and lyric copyright catalogue (the “Catalogue”) to a newly formed company pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated December 5, 1964 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). The amounts are currently payable by EMI Music Publishing (“EMI”), the current owner and administrative entity for the copyrighted materials. Payment of the Contingent Portion to the Trust continues until the end of the year in which the last copyright in the Catalogue expires and cannot be renewed.

HSBC BANK USA, N.A. (“HSBC”) acts as the Corporate Trustee for the Trust.

Proceeds from Contingent Portion Payments

The Trust receives quarterly payments of the Contingent Portion from EMI and distributes the amounts it receives to the owners (the “Unit Holders”) of the units of beneficial interest in the Trust (the “Trust Units”) after payment of expenses and liabilities of the Trust. The Declaration of Trust provides that these are the Trust’s sole responsibilities and that the Trust is prohibited from engaging in any business activities.

Payments of the Contingent Portion made to the Trust by EMI are based on royalty income generated by the Catalogue and collected by EMI. The Trust does not own the Catalogue or any copyrights or other intellectual property rights and is not responsible for collecting royalties in connection with the Catalogue. As the current owner and administrator of the Catalogue, EMI is obligated under the Asset Purchase Agreement to use its “best efforts” to collect all royalties, domestic and foreign, in connection with the Catalogue and to remit a portion of its royalty income to the Trust as its Contingent Portion payment obligation in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Calculation of the Contingent Portion

The amount of each payment of the Contingent Portion is based on a formula set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement. For information regarding how the Contingent Portion is calculated and a current disagreement between EMI and the Trust regarding the calculation method see “Calculation of Contingent Portion” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

–3–

Table of Contents

Cash Distributions to Unit Holders

The Declaration of Trust requires the distribution of all funds received by the Trust to Unit Holders after payment of expenses on a quarterly basis. See the table headed “Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements” under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for information regarding cash disbursements made to Unit Holders for the two years ended December 31, 2012.

The Copyright Catalogue

The Catalogue is estimated to be composed of over 25,000 music titles (the “Copyrighted Songs”), of which approximately 1,600 produced royalty income in recent years. Based on information provided to the Trust by EMI, most of the royalty income generated by the Catalogue during recent years has been produced by a relatively small number of copyrights established prior to 1964.

EMI has provided the Trust with a listing (the “2012 Listing”) of the top 50 earning songs in the Catalogue during the 2012 calendar year (the “Top 50 Songs”), together with the Contingent Portion payments made to the Trust during the 2012 calendar year, with respect to each of the Top 50 Songs. The 2012 Listing also contains the following information for each song title: the writer(s), the original copyright and copyright renewal date and the date on which each copyright enters the public domain in the United States.

EMI has authorized the Trust to disclose the 2012 Listing and it is set forth below in the form provided to the Trust by EMI.

There can be no assurance that the 2012 Listing is indicative of the future performance of the Copyrighted Songs or that EMI will be able to retain its rights to the Copyrighted Songs during their full term of copyright protection. As of the date of this report, no audit has been completed by the Trust to confirm the accuracy of the information contained in the 2012 Listing and there can be no assurance that the information provided by EMI in the 2012 Listing is accurate.

2012

Mills Music Trust Top 50 Songs

Status of US Copyright protection may vary.

Material Contracts and Agreements

In August 2011 the Trust engaged Prager Metis International LLC (formerly Prager & Fenton LLP) (“Prager”), an accounting firm specializing in auditing royalty income, to determine if payments of the Contingent Portion by EMI to the Trust have been properly made in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement. The Prager Report cost the Trust $50,000 in total, all of which has been paid to date.

–4–

Table of Contents

For information regarding the audit results see “Audit of Royalty Income” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

Accounting Policies

Payments from EMI to the Trust of the Contingent Portion are typically made in March, June, September and December for the prior calendar quarter. The payments received are accounted for on a cash basis, as are expenses. The Declaration of Trust requires the distribution of all funds received by the Trust to the Unit Holders after expenses are paid.

The Trust’s financial statements reflect only cash transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in financial statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting, as contemplated by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Trust does not prepare a balance sheet or a statement of cash flows.

Not Applicable

None

The Trust does not own any property. The administrative office of the Trust is located at HSBC Bank, USA, National Association, Corporate Trust Issuer Services, 452 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10018. No expense is being charged or paid by the Trust for the office space and office equipment that is being utilized for the Trust.

None

Not applicable

–5–

Table of Contents

Market Information

The Trust Units are traded on the over-the-counter market and quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “MMTRS”.

Price Range of Trust Units

The following table sets forth the high and low bid amounts for the Trust Units (as reported by Thomson One (Reuters)) during each quarter of the two most recent calendar years. Quotations represent inter-dealers prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Unit Holders

As of December 31, 2012, there were 135 Trust Unit holders of record. Because many of the Trust Units are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of Unit Holders, the Trust is unable to estimate the total number of Unit Holders.

Dividends

The Declaration of Trust requires the distribution of all funds received by the Trust to Unit Holders after payment of expenses on a quarterly basis. See the table under the section headed Item 6, “Selected Financial Data” for information about cash disbursements made to Unit Holders.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None

–6–

Table of Contents

The information set forth below for the five years ended December 31, 2012, is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and related notes thereto included in Item 8 of this report to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below.

Contingent Portion Payments

The Trust distributes the amounts it receives in Contingent Portion payments from EMI to the Unit Holders, after payment of expenses and liabilities of the Trust. The Declaration of Trust provides that these are the Trust’s sole responsibilities and that the Trust is prohibited from engaging in any business activities.

The Trust does not own the Catalogue or any copyrights or other intellectual property rights and is not responsible for collecting royalties in connection with the Catalogue. As the current owner and administrator of the Catalogue, EMI is obligated under the Asset Purchase Agreement to use its “best efforts” to collect all royalties, domestic and foreign, in connection with the Catalogue and to remit a portion of its royalty income to the Trust as its Contingent Portion payment obligation in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement.

–7–

Table of Contents

Payments of the Contingent Portion are ordinarily distributed to the Trust by EMI approximately two to three months after a quarter ends. The Trust’s annual income from payments of the Contingent Portion over the 2010, 2011 and 2012 calendar years has averaged $984,220 per year.

Calculation of the Contingent Portion

The amount of each payment of the Contingent Portion is based on a formula provided in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Quarterly Periods Prior to the First Quarter of 2010

Prior to the first quarter of 2010, the Contingent Portion was calculated as an amount ranging from 65% to 75% of gross royalty income from EMI’s exploitation of the Catalogue for each quarterly period, less royalty expenses (the “Old Calculation Method”).

In addition, the Trust is of the view that prior to the first quarter of 2010, the Contingent Portion was guaranteed to be at least a minimum of $167,500 per quarter (the “Minimum Payment Obligation”). Prior to the first quarter of 2010, EMI made Contingent Portion payments in compliance with the Minimum Payment Obligation, but has recently questioned the rationale for such compliance.

Quarterly Periods Beginning with the First Quarter of 2010

Beginning with the first quarter of 2010, the Asset Purchase Agreement provides for certain changes with respect to the calculation of the Contingent Portion. Both EMI and the Trust agree that one such change is that the Minimum Payment Obligation is no longer in effect.

The Trust is also of the view that the Contingent Portion payable to the Trust changed to a fixed 75% of gross royalty income from EMI’s exploitation of the Catalogue for each quarterly period, less royalty related expenses (the “New Calculation Method”).

EMI made Contingent Portion payments to the Trust for the first two quarters of 2010 in accordance with the Old Calculation Method. The Trust informed EMI that the use of the Old Calculation Method instead of the New Calculation Method during these quarterly periods resulted in an underpayment of the Contingent Portion to the Trust. After being notified of the Trust’s position, EMI made additional payments to the Trust to correct the underpayment.

Until the quarter ended March 31, 2012, EMI continued to make Contingent Portion payments to the Trust in accordance with the New Calculation Method. However, starting with the quarter ended June 30, 2012, EMI reverted back to calculating the Contingent Portion using the Old Calculation Method and EMI’s legal counsel subsequently advised the Trust that EMI now takes the position that the Old Calculation Method is in effect for all quarterly periods before and after the first quarter of 2010.

EMI also indicated to the Trust that (a) it plans to continue using the Old Calculation Method, (b) the Old Calculation Method should have been used during all prior periods and (c) certain overpayments were made to the Trust as a result of its use of the New Calculation Method during prior periods.

–8–

Table of Contents

The Trust has notified EMI that (a) it does not agree with EMI’s continued use of the Old Calculation Method, (b) the New Calculation Method should be used for all periods since the first quarter of 2010 and (c) that it does not agree that overpayments were made to the Trust in prior periods.

As a result of EMI’s use of the Old Calculation Method instead of the New Calculation Method, EMI’s payments of the Contingent Portion for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012 were deficient, in the Trust’s view, by $77,096 and $13,398 respectively.

The Trust is currently in discussions with EMI to attempt to resolve this matter. In furtherance of these discussions EMI and the Trust executed a tolling agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012 (the “2012 Tolling Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties agreed to suspend recognition of the passage of time for purposes of any relevant statute of limitations defenses the parties could claim in connection with the parties’ disagreement regarding the proper calculation method and not to commence litigation without complying with notice provisions contained in the 2012 Tolling Agreement. The 2012 Tolling Agreement expires on June 15, 2013.

The 2012 Tolling Agreement also covers potential claims that the Trust may have against EMI concerning underpayments of the Contingent Portion. See “Audit of Royalty Income” under this Item below.

The Trust can offer no assurance that it will be able to recover any additional amounts in connection with the disagreement discussed above, that EMI will ultimately agree with the Trust’s position on the calculation of the Contingent Portion, or that EMI will not seek to recover any amounts that it claims as overpayments.

The Copyright Catalogue

The Catalogue is estimated to be composed of over 25,000 music titles, of which approximately 1,600 produced royalty income in recent years. Most of the royalty income generated by the Catalogue during recent years has been produced by a relatively small number of copyrights established prior to 1964 and is produced by sources in the United States, but the Catalogue also generates royalty income in Canada and other foreign countries in which copyright is claimed.

See the table headed “Mills Music Trust Top 50 Songs 2012” under Item 1, “Business” for the 2012 Listing provided by EMI to the Trust.

The Trust’s receipts from EMI are derived principally from copyrights established prior to 1964 and fluctuate based on consumer interest in the “nostalgia” appeal of older songs and the overall popularity of the songs contained in the Catalogue.

A number of factors create uncertainties with respect to the Catalogue’s ability to continue to generate the same level of royalty income on a continuing, long-term basis. These factors include: (i) the effect that foreign and domestic copyright laws and any changes therein have or will have on renewal rights (e.g., vesting of renewal term rights), (ii) the length of the term of copyright protection under foreign

–9–

Table of Contents

and domestic copyright laws, (iii) reversionary rights that may effect whether EMI is able to retain its rights to the Copyrighted Songs during certain renewal terms (e.g., statutory termination of transfers or “copyright recapture”), and (iv) a disagreement between EMI and the Trust regarding the calculation method of the Contingent Portion. See “Calculation of the Contingent Portion” under this Item above.

The Trust’s income is dependent, in part, on EMI’s ability to maintain its rights in the copyrighted songs contained in the Catalogue (the “Copyrighted Songs”) through copyright protection. As the copyrights for the Copyrighted Songs expire, less royalty income will be generated and the size of each payment of the Contingent Portion will be reduced accordingly.

Based on the 2012 Listing, the Top 50 Songs obtained copyright registration under the United States Copyright Act of 1909 (the “1909 Act”) between 1920 and 1960. For copyrighted works subject to the 1909 Act, copyright law generally provides for a possible 95 years of copyright protection, subject to certain factors, including the initial registration date of each copyright and compliance with certain statutory provisions including notice and renewal. The Copyright expiration dates for the Top 50 Songs range between 1995 and 2055, as set forth in the 2012 Listing.

The Copyrighted Songs are subject to statutory rights of termination of transfers, which may impact whether EMI is able to retain its ownership of the Copyrighted Songs during their term of copyright protection. For copyrights governed by the 1909 Act, this termination right vests at the end of two different renewal terms, which vary for each Copyrighted Song.

As the owner of the Catalogue, EMI, and not the Trust, is responsible for administrating the Catalogue and seeking renewals of the Copyrighted Songs. EMI does not provide detailed information to the Trust with respect to the status of renewals. However, the Asset Purchase Agreement provides that EMI is obligated to use its “best efforts” to secure renewals.

The 2007 Tolling Agreement

In 2007 a dispute arose between EMI and the Trust regarding $259,500 in deductions taken by EMI against its payments to the Trust of the Contingent Portion (the “Dispute”). EMI claimed the deductions were made in connection with certain expenses it incurred in years prior to 2007. As of the date of this report, the Dispute has not been settled. However, on October 4, 2007, EMI and the Trust executed a tolling agreement (the “2007 Tolling Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties agreed to suspend recognition of the passage of time for purposes of any relevant statute of limitations defenses the parties could claim and not to commence litigation without complying with notice provisions contained in the 2007 Tolling Agreement. The 2007 Tolling Agreement, which was initially scheduled to expire on April 1, 2008, has been extended by mutual written consent through June 15, 2013.

Audit of Royalty Income

In August 2011 the Trust engaged Prager, an accounting firm specializing in auditing royalty income, to determine if payments of the Contingent Portion by EMI to the Trust have been properly made in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement. Prager’s final audit report (the “Prager Report”), which

–10–

Table of Contents

covers the period from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2011 (the “Audit Period”), was delivered to the Trust on September 25, 2012. The Prager Report cost the Trust $50,000 in total, all of which has been paid to date.

The Prager Report identified multiple underpayments of the Contingent Portion during the Audit Period. The Trust is currently discussing the results of the audit with EMI and is attempting to seek recovery of the underpayments. In furtherance of these discussions EMI and the Trust agreed that the 2012 Tolling Agreement would cover any claims that had not already expired relating to Contingent Portion payments made during the Audit Period, in addition to claims relating to the calculation method disagreement discussed in this Item above. The Trust can offer no assurance that it will be able to recover any additional amounts from EMI related to the underpayments identified by the Prager Report.

Inflation

The Trust does not believe that its activities have been materially affected by inflation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Declaration of Trust requires the distribution of all funds received by the Trust to the Unit Holders after payment of expenses on a quarterly basis. See the table under the section headed Item 6, “Selected Financial Data” for information about cash disbursements made to Unit Holders.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Trust’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations or liquidity that is material to investors.

Not applicable

Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm and financial statements begin on page 12 of this report.

–11–

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Trustees and Unit Owners

Mills Music Trust

We have audited the accompanying statements of cash receipts and disbursements of Mills Music Trust for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 1 to the financial statements, these financial statements were prepared on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the cash receipts and disbursements of Mills Music Trust for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.

Attention is directed to Notes 1 and 4 to the financial statements for information concerning disputes with respect to certain amounts believed to be owed to Mills Music Trust.

New York, New York

April 1, 2013

–12–

Table of Contents

MILLS MUSIC TRUST

STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

See accompanying Notes to Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements

The Trust does not prepare a balance sheet or a statement of cash flows.

–13–

Table of Contents

MILLS MUSIC TRUST

NOTES TO STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Organization and Background

Mills Music Trust (the “Trust”) was created by a Declaration of Trust dated December 3, 1964 (the “Declaration of Trust”), for the purpose of acquiring from Mills Music, Inc. (“Old Mills”), the rights to receive payment of a deferred contingent purchase price obligation (the “Contingent Portion”) payable to Old Mills. The obligation to pay the Contingent Portion arose as the result of the sale by Old Mills of its music and lyric copyright catalogue (the “Catalogue”) to a newly formed company pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated December 5, 1964 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). The amounts are currently payable by EMI Music Publishing (“EMI”), the current owner and administrative entity for the copyrighted materials. Payment of the Contingent Portion to the Trust continues until the end of the year in which the last copyright in the Catalogue expires and cannot be renewed.

HSBC BANK USA, N.A. (“HSBC”) acts as the Corporate Trustee for the Trust.

Proceeds from Contingent Portion Payments

The Trust receives quarterly payments of the Contingent Portion from EMI and distributes the amounts it receives to the owners (the “Unit Holders”) of the units of beneficial interest in the Trust (the “Trust Units”) after payment of expenses and liabilities of the Trust. The Declaration of Trust provides that these are the Trust’s sole responsibilities and that the Trust is prohibited from engaging in any business activities.

Payments of the Contingent Portion made to the Trust by EMI are based on royalty income generated by the Catalogue and collected by EMI. The Trust does not own the Catalogue or any copyrights or other intellectual property rights and is not responsible for collecting royalties in connection with the Catalogue. As the current owner and administrator of the Catalogue, EMI is obligated under the Asset Purchase Agreement to use its “best efforts” to collect all royalties, domestic and foreign, in connection with the Catalogue and to remit a portion of its royalty income to the Trust as its Contingent Portion payment obligation in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Calculation of the Contingent Portion

The amount of each payment of the Contingent Portion is based on a formula provided in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Quarterly Periods Prior to the First Quarter of 2010

Prior to the first quarter of 2010, the Contingent Portion was calculated as an amount ranging from 65% to 75% of gross royalty income from EMI’s exploitation of the Catalogue for each quarterly period, less royalty expenses (the “Old Calculation Method”).

–14–

Table of Contents

In addition, the Trust is of the view that prior to the first quarter of 2010, the Contingent Portion was guaranteed to be at least a minimum of $167,500 per quarter (the “Minimum Payment Obligation”). Prior to the first quarter of 2010, EMI made Contingent Portion payments in compliance with the Minimum Payment Obligation, but has recently questioned the rationale for such compliance.

Quarterly Periods Beginning with the First Quarter of 2010

Beginning with the first quarter of 2010, the Asset Purchase Agreement provides for certain changes with respect to the calculation of the Contingent Portion. Both EMI and the Trust agree that one such change is that the Minimum Payment Obligation is no longer in effect.

The Trust is also of the view that the Contingent Portion payable to the Trust changed to a fixed 75% of gross royalty income from EMI’s exploitation of the Catalogue for each quarterly period, less royalty related expenses (the “New Calculation Method”).

EMI made Contingent Portion payments to the Trust for the first two quarters of 2010 in accordance with the Old Calculation Method. The Trust informed EMI that the use of the Old Calculation Method instead of the New Calculation Method during these quarterly periods resulted in an underpayment of the Contingent Portion to the Trust. After being notified of the Trust’s position, EMI made additional payments to the Trust to correct the underpayment.

Until the quarter ended March 31, 2012, EMI continued to make Contingent Portion payments to the Trust in accordance with the New Calculation Method. However, starting with the quarter ended June 30, 2012, EMI reverted back to calculating the Contingent Portion using the Old Calculation Method and EMI’s legal counsel subsequently advised the Trust that EMI now takes the position that the Old Calculation Method is in effect for all quarterly periods before and after the first quarter of 2010.

EMI also indicated to the Trust that (a) it plans to continue using the Old Calculation Method, (b) the Old Calculation Method should have been used during all prior periods and (c) certain overpayments were made to the Trust as a result of its use of the New Calculation Method during prior periods.

The Trust has notified EMI that (a) it does not agree with EMI’s continued use of the Old Calculation Method, (b) the New Calculation Method should be used for all periods since the first quarter of 2010 and (c) that it does not agree that overpayments were made to the Trust in prior periods.

As a result of EMI’s use of the Old Calculation Method instead of the New Calculation Method, EMI’s payments of the Contingent Portion for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and September 31, 2012 were deficient, in the Trust’s view, by $77,096 and $13,398 respectively.

The Trust is currently in discussions with EMI to attempt to resolve this matter. In furtherance of these discussions EMI and the Trust executed a tolling agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012 (the “2012 Tolling Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties agreed to suspend recognition of the passage of time for purposes of any relevant statute of limitations defenses the parties could claim in connection with the

–15–

Table of Contents

parties’ disagreement regarding the proper calculation method and not to commence litigation without complying with notice provisions contained in the 2012 Tolling Agreement. The 2012 Tolling Agreement expires on June 15, 2013.

The 2012 Tolling Agreement also covers potential claims that the Trust may have against EMI concerning underpayments of the Contingent Portion. See “Audit of Royalty Income” under this Item below.

The Trust can offer no assurance that it will be able to recover any additional amounts in connection with the disagreement discussed above, that EMI will ultimately agree with the Trust’s position on the calculation of the Contingent Portion, or that EMI will not seek to recover any amounts that it claims as overpayments.

Accounting Policies

Payments from EMI to the Trust of the Contingent Portion are typically made in March, June, September and December for the prior calendar quarter. The payments received are accounted for on a cash basis, as are expenses. The Declaration of Trust requires the distribution of all funds received by the Trust to the Unit Holders after expenses are paid.

The Trust’s financial statements reflect only cash transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in financial statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting, as contemplated by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Trust does not prepare a balance sheet or a statement of cash flows.

Unpaid Expenses

As of December 31, 2012 there was approximately $73,556 of unpaid expenses for services rendered to the Trust to be paid from undistributed proceeds on hand and the proceeds of subsequent receipts of Contingent Portion payments from EMI.

No provision for income taxes has been made since the liability therefore is that of the Unit Holders and not the Trust.

The Declaration of Trust provides that each trustee shall receive annual compensation of $2,500 per year for its services, provided that such aggregate compensation to the trustees as a group may not exceed 3% of the monies received by the Trust in any year.

The Declaration of Trust also provides for the reimbursement of expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of a trustee’s duties to the Trust, including clerical and administrative services.

–16–

Table of Contents

Accordingly, HSBC receives annual compensation and reimbursement for services it performs to the Trust as the Registrar and Transfer Agent of the certificates representing the Trust Units. The Declaration of Trust also provides that if a trustee performs unusual or extraordinary services, reasonable compensation for such services shall be paid, subject to certain limitations and to prior confirmation by Unit Holders holding a majority interest in the Trust.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Declaration of Trust, disbursements were made as follows for the two years ended December 31:

See the Section headed Item 2, “Properties” for further information about the administrative office for the Trust, which is provided by HSBC.

The Copyright Catalogue

The Trust’s income is dependent, in part, on EMI’s ability to maintain its rights in the copyrighted songs contained in the Catalogue (the “Copyrighted Songs”) through copyright protection. As the copyrights for the Copyrighted Songs expire, less royalty income will be generated and the size of each payment of the Contingent Portion will be reduced accordingly.

Based on the 2012 Listing, the Top 50 Songs obtained copyright registration under the United States Copyright Act of 1909 (the “1909 Act”) between 1920 and 1960. For copyrighted works subject to the 1909 Act, copyright law generally provides for a possible 95 years of copyright protection, subject to certain factors, including the initial registration date of each copyright and compliance with certain statutory provisions including notice and renewal. The Copyright expiration dates for the Top 50 Songs range between 1995 and 2055, as set forth in the 2012 Listing.

The Copyrighted Songs are subject to statutory rights of termination of transfers, which may impact whether EMI is able to retain its ownership of the Copyrighted Songs during their term of copyright protection. For copyrights governed by the 1909 Act, this termination right vests at the end of two different renewal terms, which vary for each Copyrighted Song.

–17–

Table of Contents

As the owner of the Catalogue, EMI, and not the Trust, is responsible for administrating the Catalogue and seeking renewals of the Copyrighted Songs. EMI does not provide detailed information to the Trust with respect to the status of renewals. However, the Asset Purchase Agreement provides that EMI is obligated to use its “best efforts” to secure renewals.

The 2007 Tolling Agreement

In 2007 a dispute arose between EMI and the Trust regarding $259,500 in deductions taken by EMI against its payments to the Trust of the Contingent Portion (the “Dispute”). EMI claimed the deductions were made in connection with certain expenses it incurred in years prior to 2007. As of the date of this report, the Dispute has not been settled. However, on October 4, 2007, EMI and the Trust executed a tolling agreement (the “2007 Tolling Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties agreed to suspend recognition of the passage of time for purposes of any relevant statute of limitations defenses the parties could claim and not to commence litigation without complying with notice provisions contained in the 2007 Tolling Agreement. The 2007 Tolling Agreement, which was initially scheduled to expire on April 1, 2008, has been extended by mutual written consent through June 15, 2013.

Audit of Royalty Income

In August 2011 the Trust engaged Prager, an accounting firm specializing in auditing royalty income, to determine if payments of the Contingent Portion by EMI to the Trust have been properly made in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement. Prager’s final audit report (the “Prager Report”), which covers the period from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2011 (the “Audit Period”), was delivered to the Trust on September 25, 2012. The Prager Report cost the Trust $50,000 in total, all of which has been paid to date.

The Prager Report identified multiple underpayments of the Contingent Portion during the Audit Period. The Trust is currently discussing the results of the audit with EMI and is attempting to seek recovery of the underpayments. In furtherance of these discussions EMI and the Trust agreed that the 2012 Tolling Agreement would cover any claims that had not already expired relating to Contingent Portion payments made during the Audit Period, in addition to claims relating to the calculation method disagreement discussed in this Item above. The Trust can offer no assurance that it will be able to recover any additional amounts from EMI related to the underpayments identified by the Prager Report.

None

–18–

Table of Contents

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Trust maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in this report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Trust’s management, which is comprised of the Trust Officer of the Corporate Trustee and the Chief Financial Individual providing accounting services to the Trust, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. The Trust’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Trust’s management concluded that the design and operation of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures provided reasonable assurance that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to accomplish their objectives.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Trust is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Trust as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Trust’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements and the reliability of financial reporting.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on management’s assessment, the Trust believes that, as of December 31, 2012, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Trust’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Trust’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Trust to provide only management’s report in this annual report on Form 10-K.

–19–

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

None

–20–

Table of Contents

The Trust does not have, nor does the Declaration of Trust provide for, officers or a board of directors. HSBC is the Corporate Trustee of the Trust. Pursuant to the Declaration of Trust, trustees serve until their removal, resignation, incapacity, or in the case of individual trustees, their death.

HSBC (or its predecessor, Marine Midland Bank) has been the Corporate Trustee since February 1965 and is a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States.

The Trust has not adopted its own code of ethics (as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as the Trust is managed by the Corporate Trustee and thus relies on the employees of the Corporate Trustee to abide by the codes of ethics established by the Corporate Trustee or its affiliates.

The Trust’s activities are limited to receipt of the Contingent Portion payments and the distribution of the amounts it receives to the Unit Holders, after payment of expenses and liabilities to the Trust.

The Trust is not a corporate entity and thus does not have an Audit Committee. The Corporate Trustee has established a pre-approval policy with regard to audit, audit-related and certain non-audit engagements by the Trust of its independent auditors. Under this policy, the Corporate Trustee annually pre-approves certain limited, specified recurring services which may be provided by the Trust’s independent auditors, subject to maximum dollar limitations. All other engagements for services to be performed by the Trust’s independent auditors must be separately pre-approved by the Corporate Trustee.

The Trust does not have, nor does the Declaration of Trust provide for, officers, a board of directors or any employees. The compensation paid to the Trustee is governed by the Declaration of Trust. The Declaration of Trust does not provide for any stock awards, option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, change in pension value or nonqualified deferred compensation earnings. The Trust does not have severance agreements nor does it provide post-retirement benefits to the Corporate Trustee. See the Section headed Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” of this report for a description of annual compensation and reimbursements paid by the Trust.

–21–

Table of Contents

To the best knowledge of the Corporate Trustee as of December 31, 2012, the only persons who beneficially owned more than 5% of the Trust Units are as follows:

The Trust has no directors. There were no Trust Units owned or pledged by HSBC as of December 31, 2012. The Trust does not have any compensation plans under which the Trust Units are authorized for issuance.

The Declaration of Trust provides that each trustee shall receive annual compensation of $2,500 per year for its services, provided that such aggregate compensation to the trustees as a group may not exceed 3% of the monies received by the Trust in any year.

The Declaration of Trust also provides for the reimbursement of expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of a trustee’s duties to the Trust, including clerical and administrative services.

Accordingly, HSBC receives annual compensation and reimbursement for services it performs to the Trust as the Registrar and Transfer Agent of the certificates representing the Trust Units.

The Declaration of Trust also provides that if a trustee performs unusual or extraordinary services, reasonable compensation for such services shall be paid, subject to certain limitations and to prior confirmation by Unit Holders holding a majority interest in the Trust.

–22–

Table of Contents

Audit Fees

Fees paid to Cornick, Garber & Sandler, LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of the Trust’s annual statement of cash receipts and disbursements and the review of its interim quarterly financial statements included in its quarterly reports on Forms 10Q aggregated $14,200 in 2012 and $19,450 in 2011.

Audit-Related Fees

$13,000

Tax Fees

None

All Other Fees – For Quarterly Reviews of Form 10Q

$1,200

Audit Committee

The Trust is not a corporate entity and thus does not have an audit committee. The Corporate Trustee has established a pre-approval policy with regard to audit, audit-related and certain non-audit engagements by the Trust of its independent auditors. Under this policy, the Trustee annually pre-approves certain limited, specified recurring services which may be provided by the Trust’s independent auditors, subject to maximum dollar limitations. All other engagements for services to be performed by the Trust’s independent auditors must be separately pre-approved by the Trustee.

–23–

Table of Contents

–24–

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

–25–