UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
ROOMLINX, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
83-0401552
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
11101 W. 120
th
Avenue, Suite 200, Broomfield, CO 80021
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(303) 544-1111
(Registrant’s telephone number)
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
(i) Common Stock, $.001 par value per share; and (ii) Preferred Stock, $.20 par value per share.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES
o
NO
x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES
o
NO
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES
x
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES
x
NO
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | |
| Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) YES
o
NO
x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based upon the closing sale price of the common stock on June 30, 2012, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board, was approximately $15,941,319.
As of, April 10, 2013,
the registrant’s issued and outstanding shares were as follows: 6,429,413 shares common stock, 720,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock.
Documents incorporated by reference: None.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Some of the statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition or state other “forward-looking” information. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of Roomlinx, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) and our management team. Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to those risks and uncertainties set forth in Item 1A of this report. In light of the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this report, the inclusion of such statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
General
As used in this Annual Report, references to “the Company”, “we”, “our”, “ours”, and “us” refer to Roomlinx, Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.
We prepare our financials in United States dollars and in accordance with generally accepted principles as applied in the United States, referred to U.S. GAAP. In this Annual Report, references to “$” and “dollars” are to United States dollars and “CDN” are to Canadian dollars.
Background
Roomlinx, Inc.
Roomlinx, Inc. was formed in 1998, is incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada, and has its headquarters at
11101 W. 120
th
Avenue, Suite 200, Broomfield, CO 80021.
On October 1, 2010, Roomlinx, Inc. acquired 100% of the membership interests of Canadian Communications, LLC and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Cardinal Connect, LLC, a non-operating entity, Cardinal Broadband, LLC, and Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. The acquisition of Canadian Communications, LLC also included a 50% joint venture interest in Arista Communications, LLC; Roomlinx, Inc. has maintained this 50% joint venture interest. Cardinal Broadband operates as a division of Roomlinx.
Cardinal Broadband, a Division of Roomlinx, Inc.
Cardinal Broadband, LLC was formed in 2005 as a Colorado Limited Liability Company. Pursuant to the acquisition of Canadian Communications, LLC on October 1, 2010, Roomlinx, Inc. became the 100% member of Cardinal Broadband, LLC. Subsequent to the acquisition, Cardinal Broadband became a division of Roomlinx, Inc.
Cardinal Broadband offers residential and business customers telecommunication services including telephone, satellite television, and wired and wireless internet access. Cardinal Broadband is a Certified Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”), and as such has a tariff filed with the Colorado Public Utility Commission that allows it to provide traditional land line services throughout Colorado. Cardinal Broadband offers “bundled” service wherever possible, meaning that they can provide telephone, television, and internet service to the same customer, allowing a single point of contact for customer service and a single invoice for multiple services.
1
Arista Communications, LLC
Arista Communications, LLC is a joint venture between Cardinal Broadband and Wiens Real Estate Ventures, LLC, with each entity having a 50% membership interest.
Wiens is the developer of the Arista residential/retail/office development in Broomfield, Colorado. The joint venture was formed to provide telecommunication services to the Arista community. Arista Communications provides telephone, television, and internet connectivity to the residents and businesses of the Arista development, including the 1
st
Bank Center, an 8,000-seat music and sports venue. Roomlinx owns a 50% membership interest in Arista Communications through its Cardinal Broadband division. Cardinal Broadband manages the operations of Arista Communications. The financial statements of Arista Communications, LLC are consolidated with Roomlinx in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation.
Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd.
Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. (“CHL”) was formed in September of 2005, and is incorporated in British Columbia, Canada. Pursuant to the October 1, 2010 acquisition of Canadian Communications, LLC, Roomlinx, Inc. became the sole shareholder of Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. It remains a separate and wholly owned subsidiary of Roomlinx, Inc.
CHL supplies video-on-demand services to the hospitality industry. CHL operates systems throughout Canada. CHL was formed in 2006 with the acquisition of the proprietary Video-on-Demand (VOD) technology formerly offered through GalaVu Entertainment Networks. CHL also acquired the existing contracts of GalaVu. CHL offers a full selection of video-on-demand services and technology; including first non-theatrical release Hollywood motion pictures, adult, and specialty content.
CHL is based in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and is owned and managed by Roomlinx.
Business
The Company’s primary business is focused on providing in-room media, entertainment, and HD television programming solutions along with wired networking solutions and Wireless Fidelity networking solutions, also known as Wi-Fi, for high speed internet access to hotels, resorts, and time share properties. Subsequent to the acquisition of Canadian Communications, LLC on October 1, 2010, the Company also provides both wired and wireless internet access, HD satellite television service, and telephone service both Plain Old Telephone Service (“POTS”) and Voice over Internet Protocol (“VOIP”), to residential and business customers. In addition, the Company now provides VOD service to the hotel and timeshare industry throughout Canada, the United States, Mexico, and Aruba.
The Company measures its performance and recurring revenue trend based on the number of revenue generating units (“RGUs”) in service. Regarding the hospitality sector, a hotel room may have one or more RGUs. An RGU is defined as a product or service for which we invoice the hotel monthly, including interactive television, video on demand, free to guest programming, and high speed internet access. Residential properties may also have more than one RGU, which includes telephone, internet and television. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was servicing approximately 75,000 RGUs within the hospitality sector, and 16 residential communities and small businesses, representing an additional 3,600 RGUs.
Our Products and Services
In-room media and entertainment
Roomlinx provides a suite of in-room media and entertainment products and services for hotels, resorts, and time share properties. Products and services included within our in-room media and entertainment offering include our proprietary Interactive TV platform (“iTV”) and on-demand movies.
2
The Company develops proprietary software and integrates hardware to facilitate the distribution of its Interactive TV platform. With Roomlinx, iTV guests will have access to a robust feature set through the HDTV such as:
|
|
●
|
Internet Apps including Netflix, Pandora, Hulu, YouTube, Facebook, and many more
|
|
|
●
|
International and U.S. television programming on demand
|
|
|
●
|
Click and Go TV program guide or Interactive Program Guide (“IPG”)
|
|
|
●
|
Web Games
|
|
|
●
|
MP3 player and thumb drive access (edit and print documents)
|
|
|
●
|
Ability to send directions from the iTV system to a mobile device
|
Hotel guests can also easily order room service, interact with hotel associates, make restaurant reservations, edit and print documents as well as gain direct access to local dining, shopping, nightlife, cultural events or attractions all through a dynamic user interface on the TV. The Roomlinx-Interactive TV platform integrates the TV and Internet experience.
The Company provides proprietary software, a media console and a USB input jack for the hotel guest, a proprietary wireless keyboard with built-in mouse, and a proprietary remote control with a built in mouse. The Company installs and supports these components.
The Company also supplies video-on-demand services to the hospitality industry. Roomlinx offers a full selection of video-on-demand services and technology; including first non-theatrical release Hollywood motion pictures, adult, and specialty content.
Hotel customers sign long-term service agreements, where we provide the maintenance for the networks, as well as the right to provide value added services over the network.
The Company generates revenue through:
|
|
●
|
Ongoing connectivity service and support contracts
|
|
|
●
|
Network design and installation services
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of content and advertising
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of business and entertainment applications
|
|
|
●
|
E-commerce
|
|
|
●
|
The customization of its software
|
|
|
●
|
Software licensing
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of pay-per-view content
|
|
|
●
|
Sale of video-on-demand systems
|
3
The following are examples of three different custom user interfaces of the Roomlinx Interactive TV platform in use today:
4
Free-To-Guest Television Programming (“FTG”).
Our hotel satellite television programming services provide for delivery and viewing of high definition and standard definition television programming for hotels, resorts, and time share properties. The Company installs and provides services that address the entertainment and information needs of hotel guests and resort guests. We specialize in providing advanced high definition equipment for delivering digital television programming such as ESPN, HBO, Starz, and other specialty and local channels.
The Company generates revenue through:
|
|
●
|
The design and installation of FTG systems
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of television programming fees and/or commissions
|
Customers typically pay a one-time fee for the installation of the equipment and then pay monthly programming fees for delivery of a specific TV channel lineup.
Wired Networking Solutions and Wireless Fidelity Networking Solutions.
We provide wired networking solutions and wireless fidelity networking solutions, also known as Wi-Fi, for high speed internet access at hotels, resorts, and timeshare locations. The Company installs and creates services that address the productivity and communications needs of hotel, resort, and timeshare guests. We specialize in providing advanced Wi-Fi wireless services such as the wireless standards known as 802.11a/b/g/n/i.
Hotel customers sign long-term service agreements, where we provide the maintenance for the networks, as well as the right to provide value added services over the network.
The Company generates revenue through:
|
|
●
|
Ongoing connectivity service and support contracts
|
|
|
●
|
Network design and installation services
|
Customers typically pay a one-time fee for the installation of the network and then pay monthly maintenance fees for the upkeep and support of the network.
5
Residential Media and Communications
We
provide residential and business customers telecommunication services including telephone, satellite television, and wired and wireless internet access. Telephone service is provided through traditional, analog “twisted pair” lines, as well as digital “VoIP”. Analog phone service is typically provided via an interconnection agreement with CenturyLink, Inc. (formerly Qwest Communications), which allows the Company to resell CenturyLink service through their wholesale and retail accounts with CenturyLink. VoIP service is provided at properties where the Company maintains a broadband internet service to the end customer, allowing the Company to provide digital phone service (VoIP) over the same lines as their internet service.
Television service is typically provided via the Company’s agreements with DISH Network and DirecTV. Most television service is provided via a head-end distribution system, or an L-Band digital distribution system. Television service is offered in high definition whenever possible.
Internet service is provided via both wired and wireless network design. The Company provisions and manages broadband access to the residential customers through both wholesale and resale methods. Wholesale methods exist when the Company owns and controls the internet circuit and resale methods exist when the Company uses an affiliated third party to provide the internet circuit.
The Company generates revenue through:
|
|
●
|
Network design and installation services
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of telephone service (billed monthly)
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of Internet service (billed monthly)
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of television service (billed by the satellite provider with monthly commissions paid to the Company)
|
|
|
●
|
Management fees for the management of affiliated communication systems
|
Our Business Strategy
Our strategy is to focus our resources on delivering quality voice, video, data, media and entertainment, advertising, and E-commerce services to the hospitality industry and residential/business customers. We plan to aggressively penetrate the hotel, resort, and timeshare verticals through direct sales, channel sales agents, and, potentially, acquisitions or other strategic transactions. We plan to continually develop our Interactive TV platform to meet the needs of the ever changing habits of the hotel guest.
Our objective is to increase our recurring revenues and to generate profits through the installation of our Interactive TV platform, high speed internet products, high definition television, and our video-on-demand products. Roomlinx
’
goal is to be the sole source solution for in-room technology, redefining how hotel guests access content, communicate, and use business tools.
Our residential and business telecommunications division, Cardinal Broadband, will seek to continue to expand its customer base by continuing to market to its current residential properties with the aim to increase its penetration at those properties.
Our short term strategies include the following:
|
|
v
|
We are seeking to grow the number of rooms installed with our Interactive TV platform.
|
|
|
v
|
We are seeking to grow the number of RGUs under management.
|
6
|
|
v
|
We are seeking to attain preferred vendor status or become a brand standard with premier hotel brands. Our hotel customers include many of the country’s most highly regarded hotel chains.
|
|
|
v
|
We aspire to increase our advertising revenue by leveraging our portfolio of iTV installations.
|
|
|
v
|
We plan to forge strong business partnerships with Fortune 500 companies that create operational efficiencies and product enhancements.
|
|
|
v
|
We are seeking to leverage our core competencies by expanding the markets we serve beyond the United States, Canada, Mexico and Aruba into the Middle-East, Africa, Central America and the Caribbean.
|
|
|
v
|
We anticipate expanding the IP-based services and Interactive TV platform that we offer to include:
|
|
|
●
|
Integration with new and ever increasing consumer web applications
|
|
|
●
|
Continued custom integration with the Hotel’s back office applications
|
|
|
●
|
Expanded IP-based advertising through the LCD television and laptop
|
|
|
●
|
Expanded IP-based E-Commerce through the LCD television and laptop
|
|
|
●
|
Growth in our custom software development and professional services revenues
|
|
|
v
|
Through acquisition or organic growth we plan to:
|
|
|
■
|
Increase our media and entertainment base of customers
|
|
|
■
|
Increase our high speed Internet base of customers
|
|
|
■
|
Continue to focus on increasing revenues in our Canadian and other foreign segments
|
|
|
■
|
Offer additional synergistic technologies or services that allow us to sell more of our Interactive TV product
|
Our longer term strategies include the following:
|
|
v
|
Expansion into the European and Asian hotel markets.
|
|
|
v
|
Expansion into additional vertical markets, such as healthcare and high end retirement homes.
|
To recap we seek to deepen penetration within our installed customer base and expand the breadth of our overall customer base by distinguishing our current and future offerings with value-added solutions through increased marketing activities and continued custom, proprietary software development efforts that enhance the Interactive TV platform.
Ultimately, we plan to profile ourselves as our customers’ central communications, entertainment and media provider. However, we cannot assure our investors that we will be successful in attaining these goals or that we will not pursue other strategies when opportunities arise. Capital constraints and competition, among other factors, may preclude us from attaining our goals.
Sales and Marketing
Sales
As of April 10, 2013, our direct sales force consisted of 5 persons supplemented by strategic relationships with hardware, software, bandwidth and content providers.
These organizations, several of which are Fortune 200 companies, already have preferred access to customers, which may give us an advantage in the marketplace. These strategic partners stand to benefit by increasing sales of their products and services, or strengthening existing relationships, as a result of pairing their offerings with Roomlinx offerings. The size and scope of our strategic partners increases visibility and credibility at the corporate level of our brand targets allowing for simultaneous top down and bottom up sales strategies.
7
Marketing
We deploy a marketing mix consisting of:
|
|
●
|
Public Relations Programs. Communicate key initiatives, positive results, points of differentiation and promotions through press releases, industry events and key affiliations such as HTNG (Hotel Technology Next Generation) and AHLA (American Hotel and Lodging Association).
|
|
|
●
|
Direct Marketing Campaigns. Including digital, print and video delivery.
|
|
|
●
|
Product Development. Keeping a pulse on industry needs and wants through continual user research and development projects that result in differentiated products and services that provide financial and brand value to clients.
|
Operations
We have built a foundation on which to achieve quality customer service and scalability. We have achieved this by building the internal infrastructure, partnerships, and controls to scale quickly and offer quality services within the following areas: system design, system integration, system deployment, software development, project management, technical support, and on-going services.
For our high speed wired and wireless offering we act as a system designer, installer, and integrator that aggregates the products and services required to install wireless high-speed networks and deploys them through a delivery infrastructure that combines in-house technical and RF (radio frequency) experts with select system integrators in the customer’s area. After installation we seek to manage the network under a long-term contract.
For our proprietary Interactive TV platform and video-on-demand offering, we control the development of the product in-house, allowing us to have ultimate control of response time to customer requests for product customization and version updates. For installation and support we utilize both certified partners and in-house personnel. We use in-house personnel for project management and pro-active monitoring of our technical components in the field.
For our free-to-guest television programming, we design and deploy these projects using in-house personnel, as well as third party certified companies. We purchase satellite television programming then resell to our hotel customers as an integrated package with our aforementioned offerings. Ongoing service and support is provided using in-house resources and certified partners. We use in-house personnel for project management and pro-active monitoring of our technical components in the field.
For our residential telecommunications offerings, we design and deploy these projects using in-house personnel, as well as outsourcing installation labor as needed. Ongoing service and support is provided using in-house resources. Television content and bandwidth provisioning is secured through 3
rd
party providers.
Competition
Wired and Wireless High-Speed Internet Offering
The market for our high-speed internet (“HSIA”) services has leveled off. Our competitors may use the same products and services in competition with us. With time and capital, it would be possible for competitors to replicate our services and offer similar services at a lower price. We expect that we will compete primarily on the basis of the functionality, breadth, quality and price of our services. Our current and potential competitors include:
|
|
●
|
Other wireless high-speed internet access providers, such as iBahn, Guest-Tek, AT&T, and LodgeNet
|
8
Many of our existing and potential competitors may have greater financial, technical, marketing and distribution resources than we do. Additionally, many of these companies may have greater name recognition and more established relationships with our target customers. However, with our FTG and iTV products we are able to offer HSIA services as part of a larger bundle of value services.
Media and Entertainment
The competitors to our Interactive TV platform are in their infancy. However, due to our traction we believe companies may try to duplicate our offering. Because of the technical challenges, the cost to develop, and the inability to develop quickly, we do not believe the majority of our competitors will be able to duplicate our offering and bring to market quickly.
The market for free to guest services in the hospitality industry is strong, and we believe it will remain strong for the future due to the demand for HD content. We continue to win customers by being a single source for all of a hotel’s telecommunication needs and offering our value added iTV platform.
Current competition consists of players offering portions of our offering, such as video on demand, internet access, and free-to-guest programming. Competitors include:
|
|
●
|
NXTV/Quadriga, World Cinema, Lodgenet and Guest-Tek
|
Residential and Business Telecommunications
This market is served by multiple competitors, primarily the Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) (CenturyLink), the cable company (Comcast), and multiple small independent companies providing individual television, telephone, and internet services. We believe we will continue to gain customers by distinguishing ourselves from our competitors by superior service and competitive pricing. Sometimes we gain a competitive advantage because we are not
an ILEC or large cable company, as many customers prefer a company who is not so large and can give customized attention to their individual needs.
Many of our existing and potential competitors may have greater financial, technical, marketing and distribution resources than we do. Additionally, many of these companies may have greater name recognition and more established relationships with our target customers.
Product Development
We seek to continually enhance the features and performance of our existing products and services. In addition, we are continuing to evaluate new products to meet our customers’ expectations of ongoing innovation and enhancements.
Our ability to meet our customers’ expectations depends on a number of factors, including our ability to identify and respond to emerging technological trends in our target markets, develop and maintain competitive products, enhance our existing products by adding features and functionality that differentiate them from those of our competitors and offering products on a timely basis and at competitive prices. Consequently, we have made, and we intend to continue to make, investments in product development.
Patents and Trademarks
We own the registered trademarks of “SuiteSpeed®,” “SmartRoom®,” and “Roomlinx®”. We also have proprietary processes and other trade secrets that we utilize in our business.
9
Recent Financial Developments
On March 12, 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt Corporation entered into a Master Services and Equipment Purchase Agreement (the “MSA”) pursuant to which Roomlinx has agreed to provide in-room media and entertainment solutions, including its proprietary Interactive TV (or iTV) platform, high speed internet, free-to-guest, on-demand programming and related support services, to Hyatt-owned, managed or franchised hotels that are located in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. Roomlinx’s media and entertainment solutions may be provided in the “full option” (Interactive TV) or the “lite option” (Video on Demand).
Pursuant to the MSA, we have agreed to make financing available to hotels that exceed certain minimum credit criteria for the purchase of equipment necessary for the provision of the Services at annual interest rates of no greater than 11.5% per annum and subject to certain restrictions and limitations. The amount of financing that Roomlinx is required to provide will not exceed the lesser of (i) the amount of installation fees that are payable by Hyatt-owned hotels under Hotel Service Agreements that have not elected to receive equipment financing or (ii) $11 million. To date, no financing has been requested by Hyatt properties.
The MSA terminates on the later of (i) 60 days following the five year anniversary of the effective date or (ii) if any Hotel Services Agreement is in effect on such five year anniversary, then the MSA will continue to apply to such Hotel Services Agreement until it expires. The MSA may be terminated by Hyatt in the event (i) Roomlinx is in breach of certain obligations under the MSA, (ii) Roomlinx is subject to bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of its creditors, is in receivership or similar proceeding or (iii) in the event of a delegation, transfer, assignment, change of control or ownership by Roomlinx or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets.
In March 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt entered into the MSA which provided for, among other things, the obligation of Hyatt to order and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company's iTV product in a minimum number of rooms in Hyatt hotels within certain time frames measured from March 2012, subject to Roomlinx's satisfaction of certain other conditions of the MSA.
In December of 2012, Hyatt had met certain obligations to place orders with Roomlinx for its systems and services. In December 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt mutually agreed to suspend certain Hyatt obligations under the MSA that had not been met, including the suspension of the obligations of Hyatt to cause a certain number of rooms in both Hyatt owned and managed properties to place orders for Roomlinx’s iTV products within certain time frames measured from the original execution of the MSA. At the time of the December 2012 suspension of these Hyatt obligations, the Company had installed certain services and products in approximately 19,000 rooms (including approximately 9,000 installs of its iTV product) in Hyatt hotels and by the end of January, 2013, had executed Statements of Work with other Hyatt hotels to install its iTV product in approximately an additional 4,600 rooms, and in connection with such Statements of Work, had received deposits from such hotels in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2012, such deposits are recorded as customer deposits in the accompanying balance sheet in the amount of approximately $1,125,000.
Hyatt recently requested, in exchange for other considerations, that, among other things, Roomlinx (i) remove the obligations of Hyatt to cause its own hotels and use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company's iTV product into a certain number of rooms within a certain timeframe, (ii) restructure or release the obligation of Hyatt to install iTV in a portion or all of the additional 4,600 rooms covered by such Statements of Work but not yet installed, and (iii) obtain credits or refunds of any portion of the $1.3 million of deposits held by the Company pursuant to the Statements of Work referred to above but not applied towards installations of the Company’s iTV product. The Company and Hyatt have held discussions regarding a resolution of these items. Such resolution may include, among other things, that the Company agree to certain of Hyatt’s requests in consideration for the Company being authorized as a Hyatt approved provider of multiple products and services and favorable shifts in the advertising revenue sharing arrangement between the parties. However, there are no guarantees that the parties will reach a resolution of these items at all or on the terms summarized above or that the suspension of obligations referred to in the preceding paragraph will end. Hyatt Hotels continues to place orders for certain Roomlinx products and services.
See “Risk Factors” for a discussion of the potential effect on the Company of the Hyatt requests.
On May 4, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with certain investors (collectively, the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Investors purchased Units from the Company for a purchase price of $2.50 per Unit. Each Unit consisted of (x) one share of common stock of the Company and (y) a warrant to purchase one-half share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.75 per share, subject to adjustment as provided in the warrant. The Company sold and issued an aggregate of 1,200,000 shares of common stock to the Investors and issued warrants to the Investors for the purchase of an additional 600,000 shares of common stock. Subsequently on June 20, 2012, the Company sold and issued an additional 80,000 shares of common stock and 40,000 warrants to certain other investors pursuant to an amendment to the SPA. In the aggregate, the Company received net proceeds of $2,993,311 (gross proceeds of $3,200,000 less $206,689 of offering expenses) from these transactions. Proceeds from such transactions have been and will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes including deployment of the Company’s iTV applications under the MSA.
10
Employees
As of April 10, 2013 we had a total of 58 full-time personnel and one part-time employee. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Environmental Matters
We believe that we are in compliance with all current federal and state environmental laws and currently have no costs associated with compliance with environmental laws or regulations.
An investment in our company is very speculative and involves a very high degree of risk. An investment in our company is suitable only for the persons who can afford the loss of their entire investment. Accordingly, investors should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as other information set forth in this report, in making an investment decision with respect to our securities
.
We have sought to identify what we believe to be all material risks and uncertainties to our business and ownership of our common stock, but we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks or uncertainties may be realized nor can we guarantee that we have identified all possible risks and uncertainties that might arise. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not currently know about or that we currently believe are immaterial may also harm our business operations. If any of these risks or uncertainties occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Risks Relating to Our Business
We Have Only a Limited Operating History, Which Makes It Difficult to Evaluate an Investment in Our Common Stock.
We have only a limited operating history upon which our business, financial condition and operating results may be evaluated. We face a number of risks encountered by early stage technology companies that participate in new technology markets, including our ability to:
|
●
|
Maintain our engineering and support organizations, as well as our distribution channels;
|
|
|
●
|
Negotiate and maintain favorable rates with our vendors;
|
|
●
|
Retain and expand our customer base at profitable rates;
|
|
|
●
|
Recoup our expenses associated with the wireless devices we resell to subscribers;
|
|
●
|
Manage expanding operations, including our ability to expand our systems if our subscriber base grows substantially;
|
|
|
●
|
Attract and retain management and technical personnel;
|
|
|
●
|
Find adequate sources of financing; and
|
|
●
|
Anticipate and respond to market competition and changes in technologies as they develop and become available.
|
We may not be successful in addressing or mitigating these risks and uncertainties, and if we are not successful our business could be significantly and adversely affected.
Both our management and our independent registered public accounting firm have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to correct these weaknesses, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results or prevent fraud may be adversely affected, and investor confidence and the market price of our shares may be adversely impacted.
11
The Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, adopted rules requiring every public company to include a management report on such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report, which contains management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if in future years, we were to meet certain market capitalization and other benchmarks, our independent registered public accounting firm would also report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2012, our management concluded that our internal control over our financial reporting was not effective.
In connection with their audit of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, our management and our independent registered public accounting firm identified and communicated to us material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in the standards established by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board that there is reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls. The material weaknesses identified by our independent auditors include lack of adequate resources and experience within the accounting and finance department to ensure timely identification, resolution and recording of accounting matters.
Although we have adopted a remediation plan to improve our internal control over financial reporting, the plan may not be sufficient to overcome these material weaknesses. We will continue to implement measures to remedy these material weaknesses as well as other deficiencies identified by our independent auditors and us in order to meet the deadline and requirements imposed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we fail to timely achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent fraud. As a result, our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the market price of our shares.
Some of Our Supplies Are Provided By One Supplier Each
The remote control devices required to utilize our services are currently supplied by a single supplier. The content for our unlimited movie services is currently supplied by a single supplier. Therefore, in the event that the supply of any of these items from any of these suppliers was to be interrupted without sufficient notice, it would have a material adverse impact on us.
Substantial Dependence on Our Contract with Hyatt
In March 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt entered into the MSA which provided for, among other things, the obligation of Hyatt to order and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company's iTV product in a minimum number of rooms in Hyatt hotels within certain time frames measured from March 2012, subject to Roomlinx's satisfaction of certain other conditions of the MSA.
In December of 2012, Hyatt had met certain obligations to place orders with Roomlinx for its systems and services. In December 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt mutually agreed to suspend certain Hyatt obligations under the MSA that had not been met, including the suspension of the obligations of Hyatt to cause a certain number of rooms in both Hyatt owned and managed properties to place orders for Roomlinx’s iTV products within certain time frames measured from the original execution of the MSA. At the time of the December 2012 suspension of these Hyatt obligations, the Company had installed certain services and products in approximately 19,000 rooms (including approximately 9,000 installs of its iTV product) in Hyatt hotels and by the end of January, 2013, had executed Statements of Work with other Hyatt hotels to install its iTV product in approximately an additional 4,600 rooms, and in connection with such Statements of Work, had received deposits from such hotels in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2012, such deposits are recorded as customer deposits in the accompanying balance sheet in the amount of approximately $1,125,000.
Hyatt recently requested, in exchange for other considerations, that, among other things, Roomlinx (i) remove the obligations of Hyatt to cause its own hotels and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company's iTV product into a certain number of rooms within a certain timeframe, (ii) restructure or release the obligation of Hyatt to install iTV in a portion or all of the additional 4,600 rooms covered by such Statements of Work but not yet installed, and (iii) obtain credits or refunds of any portion of the $1.3 million of deposits held by the Company pursuant to the Statements of Work referred to above but not applied towards installations of the Company’s iTV product. The Company and Hyatt have held discussions regarding a resolution of these items. Such resolution may include, among other things, that the Company agree to certain of Hyatt’s requests in consideration for the Company being authorized as a Hyatt approved provider of multiple products and services and favorable shifts in the advertising revenue sharing arrangement between the parties. However, there are no guarantees that the parties will reach a resolution of these items at all or on the terms summarized above or that the suspension of obligations referred to in the preceding paragraph will end. Hyatt Hotels continues to place orders for certain Roomlinx products and services.
We realized 52% of our total revenue from Hyatt controlled properties and an additional 19% of our total revenue from other Hyatt properties in 2012 and the continued suspension of Hyatt’s obligations under the MSA or the permanent removal of Hyatt’s obligations from the MSA could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
12
In the Event of a Change In Control of Our Company, Hyatt Has Certain Rights
In the event of a delegation, transfer, assignment, change of control or ownership of our Company or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, Hyatt
has certain rights under the MSA to express disapproval of the proposed transactions and
would have the right to terminate the Master Services Agreement. This termination right held by Hyatt could potentially make it difficult to explore opportunities to sell the Company or its assets.
Dependence on Key Customers and Suppliers
As a result of having signed the MSA, Hyatt Corporation properties accounted for 71% of Roomlinx revenue in 2012. The remote control devices required to utilize our services are currently supplied by a single supplier and the content for our unlimited movie services is currently supplied by a single supplier. Therefore, in the event that the supply of any of these items from any of these suppliers was to be interrupted without sufficient notice, it may have a material adverse impact on us.
New Technologies May Make Our Products and Services Obsolete or Unneeded
New and emerging technological advances, such as mobile computing devices that allow consumers to view movies and obtain information may adversely impact or eliminate the demand for our products and services. The increasing availability of content on such devices, the improved video quality of the content on such devices and faster wireless delivery speeds may make hotel guests less likely to purchase our services. Our success can depend on new product development. The entertainment and communications industry is ever-changing as new technologies are introduced. Advances in technology, such as new video formats, downloading or alternative methods of product delivery and distribution channels, such as the Internet, or certain changes in consumer behavior driven by these or other technologies and methods of delivery, could have a negative effect on our business. These changes could lower cost barriers for our competitors desiring to enter into, or expand their presence in, the television-based interactive services business. Increased competition may adversely affect our business including the scale, source and volatility of our revenue streams, cost structures and cash flow, and may require us to significantly change our operations.
Our Business is Generally Impacted by Conditions Affecting the Hospitality Industry’s Performance
Our results are generally connected to the performance of the hospitality industry, where occupancy rates may fluctuate resulting from various factors. Reduction in hotel occupancy and consumer buy rates resulting from business, economic or other events, such as generally weak economic conditions, significant international crises, acts of terrorism, war or public health issues, adversely impacts our business, financial condition and results of operations. The general economic conditions over the last several years have adversely affected the hotel industry and our business and any recovery may not be sustained. The overall travel industry and consumer buying pattern can be, has been in the past and/or currently is, adversely affected by weaker general economic climates, consumer sentiment, geopolitical instability and concerns about public health.
13
To Generate Increased Revenue We Will Have to Increase Substantially the Number of Our Customers, Which May be Difficult to Accomplish.
Adding new customers will depend to a large extent on the success of our direct and indirect distribution channels and acquisition strategy, and there can be no assurance that these will be successful. Our customers’ experiences may be unsatisfactory to the extent that our service malfunctions or our customer care efforts, including our website and 800 number customer service efforts, do not meet or exceed subscriber expectations. In addition, factors beyond our control, such as technological limitations of the current generation of devices, which may cause our customers’ experiences with our service to not meet their expectations, can adversely affect our revenues.
We May Acquire or Make Investments in Companies or Technologies That Could Cause Loss of Value to Our Stockholders and Disruption of Our Business.
Subject to our capital constraints, we intend to continue to explore opportunities to acquire companies or technologies in the future. Entering into an acquisition entails many risks, any of which could adversely affect our business, including:
|
●
|
Failure to integrate the acquired assets and/or companies with our current business;
|
|
|
●
|
The price we pay may exceed the value we eventually realize;
|
|
●
|
Loss of share value to our existing stockholders as a result of issuing equity securities as part or all of the purchase price;
|
|
|
●
|
Potential loss of key employees from either our current business or the acquired business;
|
|
●
|
Entering into markets in which we have little or no prior experience;
|
|
|
●
|
Diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
|
|
●
|
Assumption of unanticipated liabilities related to the acquired assets; and
|
|
|
●
|
The business or technologies we acquire or in which we invest may have limited operating histories, may require substantial working capital, and may be subject to many of the same risks we are.
|
We Have Limited Resources and We May be Unable to Effectively Support Our Operations.
We must continue to develop and expand our systems and operations in order to remain competitive. We expect this thesis to place strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources. We may be unable to develop and expand our systems and operations for one or more of the following reasons:
|
●
|
We may not be able to retain at reasonable compensation rates qualified engineers and other employees necessary to expand our capacity on a timely basis;
|
|
|
●
|
We may not be able to dedicate the capital necessary to effectively develop and expand our systems and operations; and
|
|
●
|
We may not be able to expand our customer service, billing and other related support systems.
|
If we cannot manage our operations effectively, our business and operating results will suffer. Moreover, even if we are successful in obtaining new customers for our products and services, we may encounter difficulty in, or be unable to, obtaining adequate resources, including financial and human, to roll-out our products and services to such customers.
Our Business Could be Harmed if we are Unable to Protect our Proprietary Technology.
We rely primarily on a combination of trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws and confidentiality procedures to protect our technology. Despite these precautions, unauthorized third parties may infringe, copy, or reverse engineer portions of our technology. In the absence of significant patent protection, we may be vulnerable to competitors who attempt to copy our products, processes or technology, which could harm our business.
14
Our Business Prospects Depend in Part on Our Ability to Maintain and Improve Our Services as Well as to Develop New Services.
We believe that our business prospects depend in part on our ability to maintain and improve our current services and to develop new services. Our services will have to achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness and meet an expanding range of customer requirements. We may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction or marketing of new services and service enhancements. Additionally, our new services and service enhancements may not achieve market acceptance.
Our Management and Operational Systems Might Be Inadequate to Handle Our Potential Growth.
We may experience growth that could place a significant strain upon our management and operational systems and resources. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our ability to compete effectively and to manage future growth will require us to continue to improve our operational systems, organization and financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. We may fail to make these improvements effectively. Additionally, our efforts to make these improvements may divert the focus of our personnel. We must integrate our key executives into a cohesive management team to expand our business. If new hires perform poorly, or if we are unsuccessful in hiring, training and integrating these new employees, or if we are not successful in retaining our existing employees, our business may be harmed. To manage the growth we will need to increase our operational and financial systems, procedures and controls. Our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. We may not be able to effectively manage such growth, and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If We Do Not Respond Effectively and on A Timely Basis to Rapid Technological Change, Our Business Could Suffer.
Our industry is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, industry standards, customer needs and competition, as well as by frequent new product and service introductions. Our services are integrated with the computer systems of our customers. We must respond to technological changes affecting both our customers and suppliers. We may not be successful in developing and marketing, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new services that respond to technological changes, evolving industry standards or changing customer requirements. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to accomplish all of the following in a timely and cost-effective manner:
|
●
|
Effectively using and integrating new technologies;
|
|
|
●
|
Continuing to develop our technical expertise;
|
|
●
|
Enhancing our engineering and system design services;
|
|
|
|
●
|
Developing services that meet changing customer needs;
|
|
●
|
Advertising and marketing our services; and
|
|
●
|
Influencing and responding to emerging industry standards and other changes.
|
We Depend on Retaining Key Personnel. The Loss of Our Key Employees Could Materially Adversely Affect Our Business.
Due to the technical nature of our services and the dynamic market in which we compete, our performance depends in part on our retaining key employees. Competitors and others may attempt to recruit our employees. A major part of our compensation to our key employees is in the form of stock option grants. A prolonged depression in our stock price could make it difficult for us to retain our employees and recruit additional qualified personnel.
If Our Hotel Customers Become Dissatisfied With Our Service, They May Elect Not to Renew Certain Products or Services With Us or They May Elect to Terminate Service Agreements, Which Could Have an Adverse Effect on Our Ability to Maintain or Grow Our Revenue.
15
In the event our customers become dissatisfied with the scope or capability of our products or services, or the level of revenue from our services, they may elect not to renew certain products or services upon expiration or terminate their existing agreements with us. The loss of these products or services or a loss of any significant number of hotel customers could have a detrimental effect on our operations and financial condition.
Our Data Systems Could Fail or Their Security Could Be Compromised, and We Will Increasingly Be Handling Personal Data Requiring Our Compliance With a Variety of Regulations.
Our business operations depend on the reliability of sophisticated data systems. Any failure of these systems, or any breach of our systems’ security measures, could adversely affect our operations, at least until our data can be restored and/or the breaches remediated. We have, to a limited extent, begun to serve as a conduit for personal information to third-party credit processors, service partners and others, and it is likely we will do so more regularly. The handling of such personal information requires we comply with a variety of federal, state and industry requirements governing the use and protection of such information, including, but not limited to, FTC consumer protection regulations and Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) data security standards and, for the Healthcare division, the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) and regulations thereunder. While we believe we have taken the steps necessary to assure compliance with all applicable regulations and have made necessary changes to our data systems, any failure of these systems or any breach of the security of these systems could adversely affect our operations and expose us to increased cost, liability for lost personal information and increased regulatory obligations.
An Interruption in the Supply of Products and Services That We Obtain From Third Parties Could Cause a Decline in Sales of Our Services.
In designing, developing and supporting our services, we rely on many third party providers. These suppliers may experience difficulty in supplying us products or services sufficient to meet our needs or they may terminate or fail to renew contracts for supplying us these products or services on terms we find acceptable. If our liquidity deteriorates, our vendors may tighten our credit, making it more difficult for us to obtain suppliers on terms satisfactory to us. Any significant interruption in the supply of any of these products or services could cause a decline in sales of our services, unless and until we are able to replace the functionality provided by these products and services. We also depend on third parties to deliver and support reliable products, enhance their current products, develop new products on a timely and cost-effective basis and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes.
We Operate in a Very Competitive Industry, Which May Negatively Impact Our Prices for Our Services or Cause Us to Lose Business Opportunities.
The market for our services is becoming increasingly competitive. Our competitors may use the same products and services in competition with us. With time and capital, it would be possible for competitors to replicate our services and offer similar services at a lower price. We expect that we will compete primarily on the basis of the functionality, breadth, quality and price of our services. Our current and potential competitors include:
|
●
|
Other wireless high speed internet access providers, such as SDSN, Guest-Tek Wayport, Greentree, Core Communications and StayOnLine;
|
|
|
●
|
Other viable network carriers, such as SBC, Comcast, Sprint and COX Communications; and
|
|
●
|
Other internal information technology departments of large companies.
|
Many of our existing and potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing and distribution resources than we do. Additionally, many of these companies have greater name recognition and more established relationships with our target customers. Furthermore, these competitors may be able to adopt more aggressive pricing policies and offer customers more attractive terms than we can. In addition, we have established strategic relationships with many of our potential competitors. In the event such companies decide to compete directly with us, such relationships would likely be terminated, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and reduce our market share or force us to lower prices to unprofitable levels.
16
We May be Sued by Third Parties For Infringement of Their Proprietary Rights and We May Incur Substantial Defense Costs and Possibly Substantial Royalty Obligations or Lose The Right to Use Technology Important To Our Business.
Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming and expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management attention from administering our business. A third party asserting infringement claims against us or our customers with respect to our current or future products may materially adversely affect us by, for example, causing us to enter into costly royalty arrangements or forcing us to incur settlement or litigation costs.
Our Quarterly Operating Results are Subject to Significant Fluctuations and, As A Result, Period-To-Period Comparisons of Our Results of Operations are Not Necessarily Meaningful.
|
●
|
The success of our brand building and marketing campaigns;
|
|
|
●
|
Price competition from potential competitors;
|
|
●
|
The amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to establishing the Company’s business operations;
|
|
|
●
|
The demand for and market acceptance of our products and services;
|
|
●
|
Changes in the mix of services sold by our competitors;
|
|
|
●
|
Technical difficulties or network downtime affecting communications generally;
|
|
●
|
The ability to meet any increased technological demands of our customers; and
|
|
|
●
|
Economic conditions specific to our industry.
|
Therefore, our operating results for any particular quarter may differ materially from our expectations or those of security analysts and securities traders and may not be indicative of future operating results. The failure to meet expectations may cause the price of our common stock to decline. Since we are susceptible to these fluctuations, the market price of our common stock may be volatile, which can result in significant losses for investors who purchase our common stock prior to a significant decline in our stock price.
Covenants under our Credit Facility may restrict our future operations and adverse consequences could result in the event of non-compliance
Our current Credit Facility contains covenants which may restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities. Future borrowing instruments, such as credit facilities and indentures, if any, are also likely to contain restrictive covenants and may require us to pledge assets as security under those future arrangements. The terms of our current Credit Facility, include many restrictive financial and other covenants. Events beyond our control, including changes in general economic and business conditions, as well as our financial performance, may adversely affect our business. Such changes in general economic and business conditions, or our financial performance, may affect our ability to meet those covenants and to otherwise remain in compliance with the requirements of our Credit Facility and other material agreements. A breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under the applicable debt instrument or agreement. In that event, the amounts under the applicable agreement could be declared immediately due and payable, or require us to amend the Credit Facility, resulting in significantly higher annual interest expense, and such a default may cause a default under some of our material agreements. As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we are limited in how to conduct our business and we may be unable to compete effectively, to meet our customer demands for installations or service or take advantage of new business opportunities.
A Significant Amount of Our Common Stock is Held by a Few Stockholders
As of April 10, 2013, Matthew Hulsizer and Jennifer Just, directly and indirectly, together with certain of their affiliates, held 1,492,522 (or approximately 23.3%) of our outstanding shares of common stock and beneficially own approximately 31.8% (common stock, inclusive of warrants) and could, therefore, have a significant influence on us.
17
Many of our Key Functions Are Concentrated in a Single Location, and a Natural Disaster Could Seriously Impact Our Ability to Operate.
Our IT systems, production, inventory control systems, executive offices and finance/accounting functions, among others, are primarily centralized in our Broomfield, Colorado facility. A natural disaster, such as a tornado, could seriously disrupt our ability to continue or resume normal operations for some period of time. While we have certain business continuity plans in place, no assurances can be given as to how quickly we would be able to resume operations and how long it may take to return to normal operations. We may experience business interruptions and could incur substantial losses beyond what may be covered by applicable insurance policies, and may experience a loss of customers, vendors and employees during the recovery period.
Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, most of which are outside of our control, including: the demand for our products and services; seasonal trends in purchasing; the amount and timing of capital expenditures and other costs relating to the development of our products and services; price competition or pricing changes in the industry; technical difficulties or system downtime; general economic conditions, and economic conditions specific to the hospitality industry. Our quarterly results may also be significantly impacted by the impact of the accounting treatment of acquisitions, financing transactions or other matters. Due to the foregoing factors, among others, it is likely that our operating results will fall below our expectations or those of investors in some future quarter.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our officers and directors are required to exercise good faith and high integrity in the management of our affairs. Our Articles of Incorporation provides, however, that our officers and directors shall have no personal liability to us or our stockholders for damages for any breach of duty owed to us or our stockholders, unless they breached their duty of loyalty, did not act in good faith, knowingly violated a law, or received an improper personal benefit. Our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws also provide for the indemnification by us of our officers and directors against any losses or liabilities they may incur by reason of their serving in such capacitates, provided that they do not breach their duty of loyalty, act in good faith, do not knowingly violate a law, and do not received an improper personal benefit. Additionally, we have entered into individual Indemnification Agreements with each of our directors and officers to implement with more specificity the indemnification provisions provided by the Company’s By-Laws and provide, among other things, that to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Company will indemnify such director or officer against any and all losses, expenses and liabilities arising out of such director’s or officer’s service as a director or officer of the Company, as the case may be. The Indemnification Agreements also contain detailed provisions concerning expense advancement and reimbursement.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
and
Potential Inability to Make Required Public Filings;
Material Weakness in our Internal Controls
Given our limited personnel, we may be unable to maintain effective controls to ensure that we are able to make all required public filings in a timely manner. In fact, from December 27, 2005 until May 14, 2009, our Common Stock was removed from listing from the OTC Bulletin Board as a result of our failure to timely make all our required public filings. If we do not make all public filings in a timely manner, our shares of common stock may again be delisted from the OTC Bulletin Board and we could also be subject to regulatory action and/or lawsuits by stockholders.
Both our management and our independent registered public accounting firm have identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. If we are unable to correct this weakness, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results or prevent fraud may be adversely affected, and investor confidence and the market price of our shares may be adversely impacted.
18
The Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, adopted rules requiring every public company to include a management report on such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report, which contains management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if in future years, we were to meet certain market capitalization and other benchmarks, our independent registered public accounting firm would also report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2012, our management concluded that our internal control over our financial reporting is not effective.
In connection with their audit of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, our management and our independent registered public accounting firm identified and communicated to us a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting as defined in the standards established by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board that there is reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls. The material weakness identified by our independent auditors relates to a lack of adequate resources and experience within the accounting and finance department to ensure timely identification, resolution and recording of accounting matters.
Although we have adopted a remediation plan to improve our internal control over financial reporting, the plan may not be sufficient to overcome this material weakness. We will continue to implement measures to remedy this material weakness as well as other deficiencies identified by our independent auditors and us in order to meet the deadline and requirements imposed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we fail to timely achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent fraud. As a result, our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the market price of our shares.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Resale of Shares Could Adversely Affect the Market Price of Our Common Stock and Our Ability to Raise Additional Equity Capital
The sale or availability for sale, of common stock in the public market pursuant to filed or future prospectuses may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and may impair our ability to raise additional capital by selling equity or equity-linked securities. The resale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price for our common stock and make it more difficult for you to sell our shares at times and prices that you feel are appropriate.
Further Issuances of Equity Securities May Be Dilutive to Current Stockholders.
It is likely that we will be required to seek additional capital in the future. This capital funding could involve one or more types of equity securities, including convertible debt, common or convertible preferred stock and warrants to acquire common or preferred stock. Such equity securities could be issued at or below the then-prevailing market price for our common stock. Any issuance of additional shares of our common stock will be dilutive to existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
19
Articles of Incorporation Grants the Board of Directors the Power to Designate and Issue Additional Shares of Preferred Stock.
Our Articles of Incorporation grants our Board of Directors authority to, without any action by our stockholders, designate and issue, from our authorized capital, shares in such classes or series as it deems appropriate and establish the rights, preferences, and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting rights. The rights of holders of classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued could be superior to the rights of the common stock offered hereby. Our board of directors’ ability to designate and issue shares could impede or deter an unsolicited tender offer or takeover proposal. Further, the issuance of additional shares having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant to the shares of common stock offered hereby. Any such issuances will dilute the percentage of ownership interest of our stockholders and may dilute our book value.
Lack of Liquid
Trading Market for Common Stock
Although our stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) under the symbol “RMLX”, the market for our common stock is not liquid as there have been days when our stock did not trade even though it was quoted.
Limited Market Due To Penny Stock
Our stock differs from many stocks, in that it is considered a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted a number of rules to regulate penny stocks. These rules include, but are not limited to, Rules 3a5l-l, 15g-1, 15g-2, 15g-3, 15g-4, 15g-5, 15g-6 and 15g-7 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because our securities probably constitute penny stock within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to our securities and us. The rules may further affect the ability of owners of our stock to sell their securities in any market that may develop for them. There may be a limited market for penny stocks, due to the regulatory burdens on broker-dealers. The market among dealers may not be active. Investors in penny stock often are unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock. The mark-ups or commissions charged by the broker-dealers may be greater than any profit a seller may make. Because of large dealer spreads, investors may be unable to sell the stock immediately back to the dealer at the same price the dealer sold the stock to the investor. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investors may be unable to reap any profit from any sale of the stock, if they can sell it at all.
Stockholders should be aware that, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. These patterns include: control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; “boiler room” practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.
Furthermore, the penny stock designation may adversely affect the development of any public market for our shares of common stock or, if such a market develops, its continuation. Broker-dealers are required to personally determine whether an investment in penny stock is suitable for customers. Penny stocks are securities (i) with a price of less than five dollars per share; (ii) that are not traded on a “recognized” national exchange; (iii) whose prices are not quoted on the NASDAQ automated quotation system (NASDAQ-listed stocks must still meet requirement (i) above); and (iv) of an issuer with net tangible assets less than $2,000,000 (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years) or $5,000,000 (if in continuous operation for less than three years), or with average annual revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the last three years. Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15g-2 of the Commission require broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors in our common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares that are deemed to be penny stock. Rule 15g-9 of the Commission requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor.
20
This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult for the Company’s stockholders to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them.
The Trading Price of Our Common Stock May Fluctuate Significantly Due To Factors Beyond Our Control
The trading price of our common stock will be subject to significant fluctuations in response to numerous factors, including:
|
●
|
Variations in anticipated or actual results of operations;
|
|
|
●
|
Announcements of new products or technological innovations by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
●
|
Changes in earnings estimates of operational results by analysts;
|
|
|
●
|
Inability of market makers to combat short positions on the stock;
|
|
|
●
|
Inability of the market to absorb large blocks of stock sold into the market; and
|
|
|
●
|
Comments about us or our markets posted on the Internet.
|
Moreover, the stock market from time to time has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have particularly affected the market prices for emerging growth companies and which often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of their common stock in the public market, the price of our common stock could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity related securities in the future at a price we deem appropriate.
We Do Not Intend to Pay Dividends on Our Common Stock.
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock and intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares of common stock unless they sell them.
Sarbanes-Oxley and Federal Securities Laws Reporting Requirements Can Be Expensive
As a public reporting company, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and other federal securities laws. The costs of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC, and furnishing audited reports to stockholders, are significant and may increase in the future.
21
Not applicable.
We lease our principal offices, which are located at 11101 W. 120
th
Avenue, Suite 200, Broomfield, CO 80021, consisting of approximately 10,500 square feet.
The Company is in receipt of a District Court Civil Summons, dated May 29, 2012, in the matter of “CLC Networks, Inc. and Skada Capital, LLC v. Roomlinx, Inc.”, commenced in the District Court of Boulder County, Colorado (the “Action”). The plaintiffs in the Action claim that the Company owes them certain unpaid sales commissions, including with respect to Hyatt Corporation in connection with that certain Master Services and Equipment Purchase Agreement, as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2012. The Company believes the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit. The Action is currently pending.
Other than the foregoing, there are no material legal proceedings to which the Company (or any officer or director of the Company, or any affiliate or owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of the Common Stock, to management’s knowledge) is party to or to which the property of the Company is subject is pending, and no such material proceeding is known by management of the Company to be contemplated.
Not applicable.
22
Our common stock trades on the OTC-Bulletin Board under the symbol “RMLX”. Our Class A Preferred Stock trades on the OTC-Bulletin Board under the symbol “RMLXP”. For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and low bid quotations for our Common Stock and Class A Preferred Stock as reported by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. The quotations represent inter-dealer quotations without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
All common shares and share prices reflected in the financial statements and in the discussions below reflect the effect of the 1-for-100 reverse stock split approved on May 28, 2010 and affected on July 29, 2010.
|
SYMBOL
|
TIME PERIOD
|
LOW
|
HIGH
|
|||||||
|
RMLX
|
January 1, - March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.70 | $ | 3.00 | |||||
|
April 1, - June 30, 2011
|
$ | 1.75 | $ | 2.55 | ||||||
|
July 1, - September 30, 2011
|
$ | 2.07 | $ | 5.00 | ||||||
|
October 1, - December 31, 2011
|
$ | 2.55 | $ | 3.60 | ||||||
|
January 1, - March 31, 2012
|
$ | 2.25 | $ | 4.80 | ||||||
|
April 1, - June 30, 2012
|
$ | 2.15 | $ | 3.50 | ||||||
|
July 1, - September 30, 2012
|
$ | 2.30 | $ | 3.98 | ||||||
|
October 1, - December 31, 2012
|
$ | 1.80 | $ | 2.75 | ||||||
|
RMLXP
|
January 1, - March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 | |||||
|
April 1, - June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.11 | ||||||
|
July 1, - September 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||
|
October 1, - December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||
|
January 1, - March 31, 2012
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||
|
April 1, - June 30, 2012
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||
|
July 1, - September 30, 2012
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||
|
October 1, - December 31, 2012
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||
The closing bid for our Common Stock on the OTC-Bulletin Board on April 10, 2013 was $1.75. Stockholders are urged to obtain current market quotations for our common stock. As of April 10, 2013, 6,429,413 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding which were held of record by 150 persons. As of April 10, 2013, 720,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding which were held of record by 2 persons.
Dividends
The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its stock. Dividends may not be paid on the common stock while there are accrued but unpaid dividends on the Class A Preferred Stock, which bears a 9% cumulative dividend. As of December 31, 2012 accumulated but unpaid Class A Preferred Stock dividends aggregated $185,160. Payments must come from funds legally available for dividend payments. It is the current intention of the Company to retain any earnings in the foreseeable future to finance the growth and development of its business and not pay dividends on the common stock.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During 2012, the Company did not repurchase any shares of our common or preferred stock.
23
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total stockholder return on its common stock with (i) the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Market Index and (ii) the cumulative total return of all companies (the “Peer Group”) with the same four-digit standard industrial code (“SIC”) as the Company (SIC 4841 – Cable and Other Pay Television Services over the period and SIC 4899 – Communication Services, NEC) over the period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2012. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in each of the Company, the NASDAQ Market Index and the Peer Group and reinvestment of dividends. The Company did not declare or pay any dividends on its common stock in 2012. The graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
This graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act or under the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
|
Footnotes:
|
||||||||
|
$100 invested on 01/01/07 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends
|
||||||||
|
Fiscal years ended December 31
|
||||||||
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On December 27, 2012, the Board determined to grant options to certain employees to purchase an aggregate of 157,250 shares of Roomlinx Common Stock in connection with the Company’s 2012 employee bonus plan, including the grant of 60,000 options to Michael S, Wasik, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and 6,250 options to Anthony Dipaolo, the former Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company. The options were granted at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, representing the closing price of the Roomlinx Common Stock on December 27, 2012. The options will vest on the anniversary of the grant date ratably over a 3 year period and will expire at the end of the day on the 7
th
anniversary of the grant date.
24
Not required.
The following discussion and analysis should be read together with our consolidated financial statements, the accompanying notes to these financial statements, and the other financial information that appears elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our SEC filings.
GENERAL
Currently we offer the following services to our customers:
|
|
v
|
Site-specific determination of needs and requirements;
|
|
|
v
|
Design and installation of the wireless or wired network;
|
|
|
v
|
Customized development, design and installation of a media and entertainment system;
|
|
|
v
|
IP-based delivery of on-demand high-definition and standard-definition programming including Hollywood, Adult, and specialty content;
|
|
|
v
|
Delivery of free-to-guest (“FTG”) television programming via satellite;
|
|
|
v
|
Delivery of an interactive (“click and go”) programming guide;
|
|
|
v
|
Full maintenance and support of the network and Interactive TV product;
|
|
|
v
|
Technical support to assist guests, hotel staff, and residential and business customers, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year;
|
|
|
v
|
Delivery of an advertising and E-commerce platform through iTV.
|
Overview
Roomlinx, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“we,” “us” or the “Company”), provides four core products and services:
In-room media and entertainment
Roomlinx provides a suite of in-room media and entertainment products and services for hotels, resorts, and time share properties. Products and services included within our in-room media and entertainment offering include our proprietary Interactive TV platform (“iTV”) and on-demand movies.
The Company develops proprietary software and integrates hardware to facilitate the distribution of its Interactive TV platform. With Roomlinx, iTV guests will have access to a robust feature set through the HDTV such as:
|
|
●
|
Internet Apps including Netflix, Pandora, Hulu, YouTube, Facebook, and many more
|
|
|
●
|
International and U.S. television programming on demand
|
|
|
●
|
Click and Go TV program guide or Interactive Program Guide (“IPG”)
|
|
|
●
|
Web Games
|
|
|
●
|
MP3 player and thumb drive access
|
|
|
●
|
Ability to send directions from the iTV system to a mobile device
|
Hotel guests can also easily order room service, interact with hotel associates, make restaurant reservations, edit and print documents as well as gain direct access to local dining, shopping, nightlife, cultural events or attractions all through a dynamic user interface on the TV. The Interactive TV platform integrates the TV and Internet experience.
The Company provides proprietary software, a media console and an extended USB port for the hotel guest, a proprietary wireless keyboard with built-in mouse, and a proprietary remote control with a built in mouse. The Company installs and supports these components.
25
The Company also supplies video-on-demand services to the hospitality industry. Roomlinx offers a full selection of video-on-demand services and technology; including first non-theatrical release Hollywood motion pictures, adult, and specialty content.
Hotel customers sign long-term service agreements, where we provide the maintenance for the networks, as well as the right to provide value added services over the network.
The
Company generates
revenue through:
|
|
●
|
Ongoing connectivity service and support contracts
|
|
|
●
|
Network design and installation services
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of content and advertising
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of business and entertainment applications
|
|
|
●
|
E-commerce
|
|
|
●
|
The customization of its software
|
|
|
●
|
Software licensing
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of pay-per-view content
|
|
|
●
|
Sale of video-on-demand systems
|
Free-To-Guest Television Programming (“FTG”).
Our hotel
satellite television programming
services provide for delivery and viewing of high definition and standard definition television programming for hotels, resorts, and time share properties. The Company installs and provides services that address the entertainment and information needs of hotel guests and resort guests. We specialize in providing advanced high definition equipment for delivering digital television programming such as ESPN, HBO, Starz, and other specialty and local channels.
The Company
generates revenue through:
|
|
●
|
The design and installation of FTG systems
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of television programming fees and/or commissions
|
Customers typically pay a one-time fee for the installation of the equipment and then pay monthly programming fees for delivery of a specific TV channel lineup.
Wired Networking Solutions and Wireless Fidelity Networking Solutions.
We provide wired networking solutions and wireless fidelity networking solutions, also known as Wi-Fi, for high speed internet access at hotels, resorts, and timeshare locations. The Company installs and creates services that address the productivity and communications needs of hotel, resort, and timeshare guests. We specialize in providing advanced Wi-Fi wireless services such as the wireless standards known as 802.11a/b/g/n/i.
Hotel customers sign long-term service agreements, where we provide the maintenance for the networks, as well as the right to provide value added services over the network.
The Company generates revenue through:
|
|
●
|
Ongoing connectivity service and support contracts
|
|
|
●
|
Network design and installation services
|
26
Customers typically pay a one-time fee for the installation of the network and then pay monthly maintenance fees for the upkeep and support of the network.
Residential Media and Communications
We
provide residential and business customers telecommunication services including telephone, satellite television, and wired and wireless internet access. Telephone service is provided through traditional, analog “twisted pair” lines, as well as digital voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) Analog phone service is typically provided via an interconnection agreement with CenturyLink, Inc. (formerly Qwest Communications), which allows the Company to resell CenturyLink service through their wholesale and retail accounts with CenturyLink. VoIP service is provided at properties where the Company maintains a broadband internet service to the end customer, allowing the Company to provide digital phone service (VoIP) over the same lines as their internet service.
Television service is typically provided via the Company’s agreements with DISH Network and DirecTV. Most television service to customers is provided via a head-end distribution system, or an L-Band digital distribution system. Television service is offered in high definition whenever possible.
Internet service is provided via both wired and wireless network design. The Company provisions and manages broadband access to the residential customers through both wholesale and resale methods. Wholesale methods exist when the Company owns and controls the internet circuit and resale methods exist when the Company uses an affiliated third party to provide the internet circuit.
The Company generates revenue through:
|
|
●
|
Network design and installation services
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of telephone service (billed monthly)
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of Internet service (billed monthly)
|
|
|
●
|
Delivery of television service (billed by the satellite provider with monthly commissions paid to the Company)
|
|
|
●
|
Management fees for the management of affiliated communication systems
|
Highlights
The highlights and business developments for the year ended December 31, 2012 include the following:
|
|
v
|
Total revenues increased 116%.
|
|
|
v
|
Hospitality revenues increased 138%.
|
|
|
v
|
Room RGUs increased 72%.
|
|
|
v
|
Signed a master service agreement with Hyatt Hotels.
|
|
|
v
|
Signed a programming and marketing agreement with DISH Network Corporation.
|
|
|
v
|
Signed a marketing and promotional agreement with Starz Entertainment.
|
|
|
v
|
Hired and trained over 50 new employees.
|
|
|
v
|
Signed an OEM and marketing agreement with HP.
|
|
|
v
|
Developed and implemented SmartEvent programs allowing conference and social planners to purchase TV distribution of information.
|
Hyatt Master Services Agreement
On March 12, 2012, we entered into the MSA with Hyatt, pursuant to which we have agreed to provide in-room media and entertainment solutions, including our proprietary Interactive TV (or iTV) platform, high speed internet, free-to-guest, on-demand programming and related support services, to Hyatt-owned, managed or franchised hotels that are located in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. Our iTV system may be provided in the “full option” (Interactive TV), the “mid option” (SmartTV) or the “lite option” (Video on Demand).
27
Pursuant to the MSA, we have agreed to make financing available to hotels that exceed certain minimum credit criteria for the purchase of equipment necessary for the provision of the Services at annual interest rates of no greater than 11.5% per annum and subject to certain restrictions and limitations. The amount of financing that we required to provide will not exceed the lesser of (i) the amount of installation fees that are payable by Hyatt-owned hotels under Hotel Service Agreements that have not elected to receive equipment financing or (ii) $11 million. To date, no financing has been requested by Hyatt properties.
The MSA terminates on the later of (i) 60 days following the five year anniversary of the effective date or (ii) if any Hotel Services Agreement is in effect on such five year anniversary, then the MSA will continue to apply to such Hotel Services Agreement until it expires. The MSA may be terminated by Hyatt in the event (i) we are in breach of certain obligations under the MSA, (ii) we are subject to bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of its creditors, is in receivership or similar proceeding or (iii) in the event of a delegation, transfer, assignment, change of control or ownership by us or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets.
In March 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt entered into the MSA which provided for, among other things, the obligation of Hyatt to order and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company's iTV product in a minimum number of rooms in Hyatt hotels within certain time frames measured from March 2012, subject to Roomlinx's satisfaction of certain other conditions of the MSA.
In December of 2012, Hyatt had met certain obligations to place orders with Roomlinx for its systems and services. In December 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt mutually agreed to suspend certain Hyatt obligations under the MSA that had not been met, including the suspension of the obligations of Hyatt to cause a certain number of rooms in both Hyatt owned and managed properties to place orders for Roomlinx’s iTV products within certain time frames measured from the original execution of the MSA. At the time of the December 2012 suspension of these Hyatt obligations, the Company had installed certain services and products in approximately 19,000 rooms
(including approximately 9,000 installs of its iTV product)
in Hyatt hotels and by the end of January, 2013, had executed Statements of Work with other Hyatt hotels to install its iTV product in approximately an additional 4,600 rooms, and in connection with such Statements of Work, had received deposits from such hotels in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2012, such deposits are recorded as customer deposits in the accompanying balance sheet in the amount of approximately $1,125,000.
Hyatt has recently requested, in exchange for other considerations, that, among other things, Roomlinx (i) remove the obligations of Hyatt
to cause its own hotels and
to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company's iTV product into a certain number of rooms within a certain timeframe, (ii) restructure or release the obligation of Hyatt to install iTV in a portion or all of the additional 4,600 rooms covered by such Statements of Work but not yet installed, and (iii) obtain credits or refunds of any portion of the $1.3 million of deposits held by the Company pursuant to the Statements of Work referred to above but not applied towards installations of the Company’s iTV product. The Company and Hyatt have held discussions regarding a resolution of these items. Such resolution may include, among other things, that the Company agree to certain of Hyatt’s requests in consideration for the Company being authorized as a Hyatt approved provider of multiple products and services and favorable shifts in the advertising revenue sharing arrangement between the parties. However, there are no guarantees that the parties will reach a resolution of these items at all or on the terms summarized above or that the suspension of obligations referred to in the preceding paragraph will end. Hyatt Hotels continues to place orders for certain Roomlinx products and services.
See “Risk Factors” for a discussion of the potential effect on the Company of the Hyatt requests.
Trends and Business Outlook
Our goal is to be the leading provider of all facets of in-room entertainment, programming and internet connectivity. We believe that we are developing the scale, capacity, and reach to respond to customers’ needs quickly and that our product offerings differentiate us from other market participants in terms of usability, technical innovation and breadth of offerings. Over the past year, we have taken significant steps towards these goals and in the first quarter of 2012 we signed a master services agreement with Hyatt Corporation which we believe validates our technology and our market approach. We believe there has been a fundamental shift in the way people communicate and from where they get their content. This shift is affecting guest habits within the hotel room. Hotel guests are getting their content from the internet or alternative mobile sources, such as laptops and smartphones. Roomlinx developed the Interactive TV platform to embrace these changing habits and allow guests easy access to their content, work, and the internet via the in-room flat panel LCD. The majority of Roomlinx’ growth in 2012 can be attributed to sales of our Interactive TV product, high speed internet services and free-to-guest TV programming. We have seen strong usage of the Interactive TV platform at our current hotel installations and we believe there is even greater ability to monetize our Interactive TV platform as we increase hotel penetration and usage. We believe our Interactive TV platform creates a true differentiation for Roomlinx and we will continue to invest in product enhancements and Interactive TV sales and marketing efforts.
28
Although our current results demonstrate the initial success of our efforts, general economic conditions and market uncertainty may still negatively affect our financial results in future periods. We anticipate that the rate of installations will become more predictable however may vary from quarter to quarter. Consequently, if anticipated installations and shipments in any quarter do not occur when expected, expenses and inventory levels could be disproportionately high, and our operating results for that quarter and future quarters may be adversely affected. Further, given the lag between the incurrence of expenses in connection with hotel installations, we anticipate that, while we will see organic growth that positions us for future profitability, our costs of sales and other operating expenses may exceed our revenues in the near term. We have incurred operating losses since our inception.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is designed to provide the reader of the financial statements with a narrative discussion of our results of operations; financial position; liquidity and capital resources; critical accounting policies and significant estimates; and the impact of recently issued accounting standards. Our MD&A is presented in five sections:
|
|
●
|
Critical Accounting Policies
|
|
|
●
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
●
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
|
|
●
|
Financial Condition
|
|
|
●
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discuss our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and property and equipment valuation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
The Company enters into contractual arrangements to provide multiple deliverables which may include some or all of the following - systems installations and a variety of services related to high speed internet access, free-to-guest programming, video on demand,
and
iTV as well as residential phone, internet and television. Each of these elements must be identified and individually evaluated for separation. The term “element” is used interchangeably with the term “deliverable” and the Company considers the facts and circumstances as it relates to its performance obligations in the arrangement and includes product and service elements, a license or right to use an asset, and other obligations negotiated for and assumed in the agreement. Analyzing an arrangement to identify all of the elements requires the use of judgment, however, once the deliverables have been identified, the Relative Fair Value of each Element was determined under the concept of Relative Selling Price (RSP) for which the Company applied the hierarchy of selling price under ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”.
The effect of application of this standard may be to defer revenue recognition for installations across the service period of the contract and to re-allocate and/or defer revenue recognition across various service arrangements.
In order to promote the Interactive TV platform, Roomlinx has agreed to provide certain customers with direct sales-type lease financing to cover the cost of installation. These transactions result in the recognition of revenue and associated costs in full upon the customer’s acceptance of the installation project and give rise to a lease receivable and unearned income.
29
We estimate the collectability of our trade receivables. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the ultimate realization of these receivables, including analysis of historical collection rates and the current credit-worthiness of significant customers.
Inventory includes materials on-hand at our warehouses as well as the cost of hardware, software, and labor which has been incurred by us for installation at our customer’s property, but has not been accepted by the customer.
The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value.
Since inception, we have
accumulated substantial
net operating loss carry forwards for tax purposes. There are statutory limitations on our ability to realize any future benefit from these potential tax assets and we are uncertain as to whether we will ever utilize the tax loss carry forwards. Accordingly, we have recorded a valuation allowance to offset the deferred tax asset.
The Company provides
compensation
costs for our stock option plans determined in accordance with the fair value based method to estimate the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and provide for expense recognition over the service period, if any, of the stock option.
In connection with the sale of debt or equity instruments, we may sell options or warrants to purchase our common stock. In certain circumstances, these options or warrants may be classified as derivative liabilities, rather than as equity. Additionally, the debt or equity instruments may contain embedded derivative instruments, such as conversion options, which in certain circumstances may be required to be bifurcated from the associated host instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument liability.
In February 2013, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income.” This ASU will require entities to present, either in a note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line items effected by the reclassification. If a component is not required to be reclassified, to net income in its entirety, a company would instead cross reference to the related footnote for additional information. This guidance is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
RESULTS OF OPERAT
IONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
Our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $13,615,865 and $6,223,925 respectively, an increase of $7,391,940, or 119%, reflecting an increase in installation revenue of approximately $6,900,000 and an increase in recurring revenue of approximately $490,000. During the year ended December 31, 2012, monthly recurring revenue increased approximately $65,000 for annual revenue of $4,450,000 in 2012. Substantially all of the increased revenue was attributable to the Hyatt MSA.
30
Direct costs exclusive of operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $12,637,242 and $4,757,072 respectively, an increase of $7,880,170, or 166%. Installation direct costs increased approximately $6,900,000 and include the cost of equipment, warehousing and freight, 3
rd
party labor, transportation costs and direct payroll costs. Recurring direct costs increased approximately $700,000 and primarily include the costs of our 24x7 call center, free to guest programming, pay per view content and 3
rd
party labor. Substantially all of the increase in direct costs was attributable to the Hyatt MSA.
Hospitality
The hospitality segment includes hotel and meeting rooms in the following geographic segments: United States, Canada, and Other Foreign. As of December 31, 2012, Other Foreign included Mexico and Aruba. The products offered under our hospitality segment include the installation of, and the support and service of, high-speed internet access, interactive TV services, video-on-demand, free to guest programming, and, advertising and e-commerce products.
United States:
US hospitality revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $11,928,694 and $3,909,726 respectively, an increase of $8,018,968 or 205%. This increase consists of approximately $7,100,000 of installation revenue and an increase in recurring revenue of $910,000 or 46%. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had approximately 75,000 and 43,500 RGUs in service.
Substantially all of the increased revenue was attributable to the Hyatt MSA.
Canada:
Canadian hospitality revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $629,143 and $1,170,319 respectively, a decrease of $541,176 or 46%. This decrease consists of a decline in installation revenue of approximately $206,000 and $335,176 in recurring revenue. We believe the change in recurring revenue relates to a combination of variables including (i) a reduction in rooms being serviced, (ii) occupancy rates and (iii) alternative sources of video on demand (“VOD”), primarily available through the internet. These alternative sources have caused Roomlinx to evaluate on a case by case basis, hotels whose contracts come up for renewal.
Other Foreign:
Other foreign hospitality revenue for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $142,974 and $201,563 respectively, a decrease of $58,589 or 29%. We believe this decrease is recurring revenue relates to a combination of variables including (i) a reduction in rooms being serviced, (ii) occupancy rates and (iii) alternative sources of video on demand (“VOD”), primarily available through the internet.
These alternative sources have caused Roomlinx to evaluate on a case by case basis, hotels whose contracts come up for renewal.
Residential
Our residential segment includes multi-dwelling unit and business customers in the United States. The products offered include the installation of, and the support and service of, telephone, internet, and television services.
Residential revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $915,054 and $942,317 respectively, a decrease of $27,263 or 3%. We believe the decline in recurring revenue relates to customers switching to alternative service providers and management companies of multiple dwelling units obtaining a fixed rate for services which it now includes in their tenant’s lease terms.
Operational Expenses
Total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $8,236,679 and $4,180,141 respectively, an increase of $4,056,538 or 97%. This increase is primarily due to (i) a one-time charge recognizing a loss attributable to the impairment of assets in the amount of $1,112,470 (more fully described below), (ii) an increase in personnel and related costs plus contractual services of $2,068,627 to support the execution of the installation of our products and their subsequent support in accordance with the Hyatt MSA dated March 12, 2012 and (iii) approximately $849,000 of various selling, general and administrative expenses as described below.
31
Operations expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $2,128,651 and $925,293, respectively, an increase of $1,203,358 or 130%. This increase is primarily due to compensation and related costs plus contractual services in the amount of $1,112,808. Additionally, operations’ allocation for rent in 2012 was $58,309 greater than 2011.
Product development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,280,743 and $725,993, respectively, an increase of $554,750 or 76%. This increase is primarily due to compensation and related costs plus contractual services in the amount of $542,216. Product development costs are expected to continue to increase with expanded developmental efforts being led to enhance media and entertainment product offerings in order to accommodate growing customer demands. Additionally, product developments’ allocation for rent in 2012 was $17,973 greater than 2011.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $3,064,200 and $1,833,038, respectively, an increase of $1,231,162 or 67%. This increase is primarily due to an increase in (i) compensation and related costs plus contractual services totaling $413,603, (ii) professional services (including legal, accounting, SEC filings/XBRL and insurance) totaling $242,877, (iii) marketing and investor relations totaling $85,327, (iv) bad debt expense of $335,876 and (v) stock based compensation of $47,430. The remaining increase in 2012 costs of $106,049 was related to various operating costs.
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $650,615 and $695,817, respectively, a decrease of $45,202 or 6%.
During the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company recognized a $1,112,470 loss on the impairment of assets due to circumstances (See note 5) indicating the carrying value of Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. (“CHL”) assets would not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from their use and eventual disposition. This loss resulted in the write-down of approximately $920,000 of property and equipment, $146,000 of inventory and $46,000 of property receivables.
Our operating loss increased to $7,258,056 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $2,713,288 for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $4,544,768. This increase is due primarily to the recognition of a loss on impairment of assets and personnel costs as more fully described above.
Non-Operating
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s non-operating income was $468,047 and $398,965 respectively. The net increase of $69,082 is due to an increase in interest income on lease receivables and a gain on the forgiveness of debt of $34,058 and $35,024, respectively.
Non-operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $601,725 and $340,072 respectively, an increase of $261,653 due primarily to advances against the Cenfin line of credit (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements) consisting of an increase of $109,958 in interest expense attributable to advances made in Q4 of 2011 and Q1 of 2012 plus an increase of $156,776 of deferred debt discount attributable to the warrants issued to at the time of such line of credit advances.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company experienced net losses of $7,391,734 and $2,654,395 respectively, an increase of $4,737,339.
This increase is due primarily to recognition of a loss on impairment of assets and personnel costs as more fully described under the “Operating Expenses” section above.
32
Related Party Transactions
Since June 5, 2009 the Company has maintained a Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Cenfin LLC, an entity principally owned by significant shareholders of the Company (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements). The Credit Agreement permits us to borrow up to $25 million until June 5, 2017. Advances must be repaid at the earlier of 5 years from the date of borrowing or at the expiration of the Credit Agreement. The principal balance may be repaid at any time without penalty. Borrowings accrue interest, payable quarterly on the unpaid principal and interest at a rate equal to the Federal Funds Rate at July 15 of each year plus 5% (approximately 5.25% at December 31, 2012). The Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our assets, and requires we maintain a total outstanding indebtedness to total assets ratio of less than 3 to 1.
The Credit Agreement requires that, in conjunction with each advance, we issue Cenfin warrants to purchase shares of Roomlinx common stock equal to 50% of the principal amount funded divided by (i) $2.00 on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings on or after July 15, 2010 ($4,172,000 as of December 31, 2012) or (ii) thereafter the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of such draw for advances in excess of $5,000,000. The exercise price of the warrants is $2.00 for the warrants issued on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings made after July 15, 2010 and, thereafter, the average of the high and low market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The exercise period of these warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company made interest payments of $260,221 to Cenfin and Cenfin advanced the Company $1,000,000. Pursuant to these advances, the Company granted Cenfin 206,000 warrants with a strike price of $2.00 and 44,000 warrants with a strike price of $4.00.
Amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement was $5,176,000 at December 31, 2012.
Effective July 25, 2011, Roomlinx entered into a consulting arrangement for marketing services with TRG, Inc., an entity owned by Michael S. Wasik, the CEO and Chairman of Roomlinx. The marketing services were to be performed by Chris Wasik, the wife of Mr. Wasik. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, Roomlinx had paid TRG $94,950 and $14,535, respectively, for services performed in accordance with said arrangement. At the beginning of December 2012, Chris Wasik became an employee of Roomlinx as its Director of Marketing with a salary of $85,000 per annum, effectively severing the consulting arrangement with TRG.
The wife of Jason Andrew Baxter, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, provides certain contract and financial services to the Company through Baxter Facilities, LLC, a limited liability company co-owned by Mr. Baxter. The Company has paid Baxter Facilities, LLC $46,321 for its services since March of 2012.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of December 31, 2012 the Company had $3,211,182 in cash and cash equivalents. That amount, in addition to the credit facility provided by Cenfin, LLC, is sufficient to fund operating activities, new product installations, and to continue investing in our new media and entertainment product through 2013. Our ability to fully draw on the line of credit may be limited by the collateral and financial covenant requirements. Working capital at December 31, 2012 was $1,700,723, an increase of approximately $33,000 compared to December 31, 2011. The increase consists primarily of proceeds from the sale of equity of approximately $3,000,000 adjusted by the change in operating assets and liabilities, primarily accounts receivable, inventory, customer deposits, and accounts payable.
We minimize borrowings under the credit facility by requiring customers to pay a 50% deposit prior to commencement of installation activities. In addition we obtained trade credit from suppliers for a significant portion of installation materials presently held in inventory. Customer deposits and trade credit are significant sources of liquidity. Should the Company be unable to obtain sufficient amounts of trade credit to finance inventory or should delays in installations result in payments under trade lines occurring sooner than deployment of the underlying inventory, borrowings under the credit facility may increase.
Beginning in January 2013, the Company initiated a vendor review program of its significant partners to validate vendor product performance vs. specifications and the accuracy of its vendor
s' invoices. As a result of this effort, the Company expects to extinguish approximately $300,000 of liabilities related to the year ended December 31, 2012. This vendor review program will be applied to substantially all vendors in 2013 and maintained thereafter.
33
Operating Activities
Net cash used by operating activities was $1,778,945 and $972,937 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in cash used in operations of $806,008 was attributable to the increase in net loss of $4,737,339 less the increase in cash provided by operations of $3,931,331. Cash provided by operations included (i) an increase of $1,484,794 in non-cash expenses due to a $1,112,470 loss on asset impairment, an increase in the provision for uncollectable accounts of $291,946 and other recurring non-cash adjustments such as stock based compensation and the amortization of debt discount, and (ii) an increase of $2,446,537 from the fluctuation in changes in operating assets and liabilities. The change in operating assets and liabilities were primarily due to the increase in accounts payable reflecting favorable vendor terms less the increase in inventory and the increase in accounts receivable due to the increase in RGUs and therefore monthly recurring revenue.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $628,268 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $1,498,051 used in investing activities during the same period in 2011. The increase in cash provided by investing activities of $2,126,319 consists of (i) an increase in cash receipts against leases receivable of $249,645, and (ii) a savings of $1,903,477 resulting from a reduction in equipment installation lease financing provided to customers in 2012 versus 2011 less an increase in capital expenditures of $26,803.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $3,963,505 and $2,528,057 respectively. The increase in cash of $1,435,448 is primarily attributable to the sale of common stock as a result of the Company having entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) on May 4, 2012 with certain investors, pursuant to which the investors purchased Units from Roomlinx for a purchase price of $2.50 per Unit, defined as one share of common stock plus a warrant to purchase one-half share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.75, which resulted in proceeds of $2,993,311 to the Company after transactions costs. See Note 11 for further details. As a result of the SPA to fund operations, the Company was able to reduce its need to borrow against its line of credit in 2012.
Contractual Obligations
We have operating and capital lease commitments, note payable commitments, and a line of credit commitment. The following table summarizes these commitments at December 31, 2012:
| Year Ended | Line of | Notes | Lease Obligations | Minimum | ||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
Credit
|
Payable
|
Capital
|
Operating
|
Payments
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2013
|
$ | - | $ | 10,631 | $ | 13,739 | $ | 131,537 | $ | 155,907 | ||||||||||
|
2014
|
464,000 | 10,964 | 13,739 | 148,585 | 637,288 | |||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
1,232,000 | 12,233 | 2,290 | 114,064 | 1,360,587 | |||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
2,480,000 | 8,932 | - | - | 2,488,932 | |||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
1,000,000 | - | - | - | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 5,176,000 | $ | 42,760 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 394,186 | $ | 5,642,714 | |||||||||||
|
|
(1)
|
The Line of Credit, as shown on the Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012 is shown net of the debt discount of $1,168,823 or $4,007,177.
|
34
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains or incorporates forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that involve risks and uncertainties. Statements regarding future events, developments, the Company’s future performance, as well as management’s expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. We develop forward-looking statements by combining currently available information with our beliefs and assumptions. These statements relate to future events, including our future performance, and management’s expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans or projections relating to the future and some of these statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “seeks,” “future,” “continue,” “contemplate,” “would,” “will,” “may,” “should,” and the negative or other variations of those terms or comparable terminology or by discussion of strategy, plans, opportunities or intentions. As a result, actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements. These statements include, among others:
- statements concerning the benefits that we expect will result from our business activities and results of exploration that we contemplate or have completed, such as increased revenues; and
- statements of our expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated developments and other matters that are not historical facts.
Among the factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements are:
|
|
●
|
the continued suspension of certain obligations of the Company and Hyatt pursuant to the MSA or the removal of such obligations from the MSA and the restructure or release of the obligations of certain Hyatt hotels to install the Company’s iTV product; |
|
|
●
|
the Company’s successful implementation of new products and services (either generally or with specific key customers);
|
|
|
●
|
the Company’s ability to satisfy the contractual terms of key customer contracts;
|
|
|
●
|
the risk that we will not achieve the strategic benefits of the acquisition of Canadian Communications;
|
|
|
●
|
demand for the new products and services, the volume and timing of systems sales and installations, the length of sales cycles and the installation process and the possibility that our products will not achieve or sustain market acceptance;
|
|
|
●
|
unexpected changes in technologies and technological advances and ability to commercialize and manufacture products;
|
|
|
●
|
the timing, cost and success or failure of new product and service introductions, development and product upgrade releases;
|
|
|
●
|
the Company’s ability to successfully compete against competitors offering similar products and services;
|
|
|
●
|
the ability to obtain adequate financing in the future;
|
|
|
●
|
the Company’s ability to establish and maintain strategic relationships, including the risk that key customer contracts may be terminated before their full term;
|
|
|
●
|
general economic and business conditions;
|
|
|
●
|
errors or similar problems in our products, including product liabilities;
|
|
|
●
|
the outcome of any legal proceeding that has been or may be instituted against us and others and changes in, or failure to comply with, governmental regulations;
|
|
|
●
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
●
|
maintaining our intellectual property rights and litigation involving intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
●
|
legislative, regulatory and economic developments;
|
|
|
●
|
risks related to third-party suppliers and our ability to obtain, use or successfully integrate third-party licensed technology;
|
|
|
●
|
breach of our security by third parties; and
|
|
|
●
|
those factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
|
We make these statements under the protection afforded by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions and uncertainties, actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Stockholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date such statements are made. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, Roomlinx undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement, or to make any other forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
35
We are exposed to market risks, primarily changes in U.S. and LIBOR interest rates and risk from potential changes in the U.S./Canadian currency exchange rates as they relate to our services and purchases for our Canadian customers.
Foreign exchange gain / (loss)
Foreign transactions resulted in a loss of $11,662 and $13,593 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The amount of gain (loss) will vary based upon the volume of foreign currency denominated transactions and fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar vis-à-vis the US dollar. These losses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
.
Translation of Financial Results
Because we translate a portion of our financial results from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar directly effect on our reported consolidated results. We do not hedge against the possible impact of this risk. A ten percent adverse change in the foreign currency exchange rate would not have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
36
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Roomlinx, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolildated statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for the year ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2011, were audited by other auditors whose report dated March 30, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2012, and the results of its consolidated operations and cash flows for the year ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ GHP HORWATH, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
April 16, 2013
37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Roomlinx, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Roomlinx, Inc., as of December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion
.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Roomlinx, Inc., as of December 31, 2011, and the results of its consolidated operations, and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Denver, Colorado
March 30, 2012
38
Roomlinx, Inc.
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 3,211,182 | $ | 361,228 | ||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
1,761,503 | 889,657 | ||||||
|
Leases receivable, current portion
|
995,220 | 994,728 | ||||||
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
115,902 | 192,221 | ||||||
|
Inventory, net
|
3,308,792 | 1,244,072 | ||||||
|
Total current assets
|
9,392,599 | 3,681,906 | ||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
790,873 | 2,145,831 | ||||||
|
Leases receivable, non-current
|
1,672,245 | 2,697,696 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 11,855,717 | $ | 8,525,433 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$ | 5,079,204 | $ | 632,428 | ||||
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
668,012 | 462,296 | ||||||
| Customer deposits | 1,125,248 | - | ||||||
|
Notes payable and other obligations, current portion
|
21,884 | 63,182 | ||||||
|
Unearned income, current portion
|
187,540 | 245,058 | ||||||
|
Deferred revenue, current portion
|
609,988 | 611,572 | ||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
7,691,876 | 2,014,536 | ||||||
|
Deferred revenue, less current portion
|
294,963 | - | ||||||
|
Notes payable and other obligations, less current portion
|
47,691 | 1,582 | ||||||
|
Unearned income, less current portion
|
198,404 | 363,381 | ||||||
|
Line of credit, net of discount
|
4,007,177 | 3,025,223 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
12,240,111 | 5,404,722 | ||||||
|
Equity:
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock - $0.20 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized:
|
||||||||
|
Class A - 720,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $144,000 at December 31, 2012 and 2011)
|
144,000 | 144,000 | ||||||
|
Common stock - $0.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized: 6,405,413 and 5,118,877 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively
|
6,405 | 5,119 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
36,971,369 | 33,102,512 | ||||||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(37,571,896 | ) | (30,185,925 | ) | ||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
7,684 | (8,802 | ) | |||||
|
Total Roomlinx, Inc. shareholders’ (deficit) equity
|
(442,438 | ) | 3,056,904 | |||||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
58,044 | 63,807 | ||||||
|
Total (deficit) equity
|
(384,394 | ) | 3,120,711 | |||||
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$ | 11,855,717 | $ | 8,525,433 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
39
Roomlinx, Inc.
for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||
|
Hospitality
|
$ | 12,700,811 | $ | 5,281,608 | ||||
|
Residential
|
915,054 | 942,317 | ||||||
|
Total
|
13,615,865 | 6,223,925 | ||||||
|
Direct costs and operating expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Direct costs (exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation shown seperately below):
|
||||||||
|
Hospitality
|
11,992,587 | 4,119,520 | ||||||
|
Residential
|
644,655 | 637,552 | ||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Operations
|
2,128,651 | 925,293 | ||||||
|
Product development
|
1,280,743 | 725,993 | ||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
3,064,200 | 1,833,038 | ||||||
|
Depreciation
|
650,615 | 695,817 | ||||||
|
Loss on asset impairment
|
1,112,470 | - | ||||||
| 20,873,921 | 8,937,213 | |||||||
|
Operating loss
|
(7,258,056 | ) | (2,713,288 | ) | ||||
|
Non-operating income (expense):
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(601,725 | ) | (340,072 | ) | ||||
|
Interest income
|
288,213 | 254,155 | ||||||
|
Other income
|
179,834 | 144,810 | ||||||
| (133,678 | ) | 58,893 | ||||||
|
Net loss
|
(7,391,734 | ) | (2,654,395 | ) | ||||
|
Less: net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest
|
5,763 | 2,206 | ||||||
|
Net loss attributable to the Company
|
(7,385,971 | ) | (2,652,189 | ) | ||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||
|
Currency translation gain (loss)
|
16,486 | (2,017 | ) | |||||
|
Comprehensive loss
|
(7,369,485 | ) | (2,654,206 | ) | ||||
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling interest
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to the Company
|
$ | (7,369,485 | ) | $ | (2,654,206 | ) | ||
|
Net loss per common share:
|
||||||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
$ | (1.27 | ) | $ | (0.52 | ) | ||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
5,809,406 | 5,072,157 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
40
Roomlinx, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF C
ASH FLOW
for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (7,391,734 | ) | $ | (2,654,395 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
650,615 | 695,817 | ||||||
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
332,121 | 175,345 | ||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
526,665 | 479,234 | ||||||
|
Gain on settlement of royalty payable
|
(179,834 | ) | - | |||||
|
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
- | (144,810 | ) | |||||
|
Provision for uncollectable accounts and leases receivable
|
291,946 | 43,813 | ||||||
|
Loss on cancellation of contracts
|
60,211 | - | ||||||
|
Reserve for inventory obsolescence
|
30,000 | 90,000 | ||||||
|
Asset impairment
|
1,112,470 | - | ||||||
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(1,075,299 | ) | (80,470 | ) | ||||
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
76,319 | (56,799 | ) | |||||
|
Inventory
|
(2,240,883 | ) | (441,571 | ) | ||||
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
4,832,326 | 273,199 | ||||||
| Customer deposits | 1,125,248 | - | ||||||
|
Unearned income
|
(222,495 | ) | 172,658 | |||||
|
Deferred revenue
|
293,379 | 475,042 | ||||||
|
Total adjustments
|
5,612,789 | 1,681,458 | ||||||
|
Net cash used in operating activities:
|
(1,778,945 | ) | (972,937 | ) | ||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Lease financing provided to customers
|
(142,879 | ) | (2,046,356 | ) | ||||
|
Payments received on leases receivable
|
972,627 | 722,982 | ||||||
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(201,480 | ) | (174,677 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities:
|
628,268 | (1,498,051 | ) | |||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net
|
2,993,311 | 125,000 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from the line of credit
|
1,000,000 | 2,480,000 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
45,000 | - | ||||||
|
Payments on capital lease
|
(13,280 | ) | (10,361 | ) | ||||
|
Payments on notes payable
|
(61,526 | ) | (66,582 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
3,963,505 | 2,528,057 | ||||||
|
Effects of foreign currency translation
|
37,126 | (10,209 | ) | |||||
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents
|
2,849,954 | 46,860 | ||||||
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
|
361,228 | 314,368 | ||||||
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 3,211,182 | $ | 361,228 | ||||
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
||||||||
|
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 264,900 | $ | 152,237 | ||||
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Assets acquired under capital lease
|
$ | 34,617 | $ | - | ||||
|
Warrants issued in connection with line of credit
|
$ | 350,167 | $ | 826,060 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
41
Roomlinx, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
Roomlinx, Inc. Shareholders
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred Stock A
|
Common Stock
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
Other |
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of
Shares |
Par Value
$0.20 |
Number of
Shares |
Par Value
$0.001 |
Paid - in
Capital |
Comprehensive
Income |
Accumulated
(Deficit) |
Non-Contolling
Interest |
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, January 1, 2011
|
720,000 | $ | 144,000 | 4,958,913 | $ | 4,959 | $ | 31,672,378 | $ | - | $ | (27,533,736 | ) | $ | 66,013 | $ | 4,353,614 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Warrants issued in conjuction with draw on line of credit
|
826,060 | 826,060 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exercise of warrants at $2.00 per share
|
62,500 | 63 | 124,937 | 125,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued at $2.00 per share
|
30,000 | 30 | 59,970 | 60,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued at $1.80 per share
|
62,010 | 62 | 111,552 | 111,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued at $2.75 per share
|
5,454 | 5 | 14,995 | 15,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock based compensation
|
292,620 | 292,620 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
(2,652,189 | ) | (2,206 | ) | (2,654,395 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Translation gain (loss)
|
(8,802 | ) | (8,802 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, December 31, 2011
|
720,000 | 144,000 | 5,118,877 | 5,119 | 33,102,512 | (8,802 | ) | (30,185,925 | ) | 63,807 | 3,120,711 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warrants issued in conjuction with draw on line of credit
|
350,167 | 350,167 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued at $2.50 per share, net of costs
|
1,280,000 | 1,280 | 2,992,031 | 2,993,311 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cashless option exercises
|
6,536 | 6 | (6 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock based compensation
|
526,665 | 526,665 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
(7,385,971 | ) | (5,763 | ) | (7,391,734 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Translation gain (loss)
|
16,486 | 16,486 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances, December 31, 2012
|
720,000 | $ | 144,000 | 6,405,413 | $ | 6,405 | $ | 36,971,369 | $ | 7,684 | $ | (37,571,896 | ) | $ | 58,044 | $ | (384,394 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
42
Roomlinx, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business:
Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) is incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada. The Company sells, installs, and services
in-room media and entertainment solutions for hotels, resorts, and time share properties; including its proprietary Interactive TV platform, internet, and free to guest and video on demand programming. Roomlinx also sells, installs and services telephone, internet, and television services for residential consumers. The Company develops software and integrates hardware to facilitate the distribution of Hollywood, adult, and specialty content, business applications, national and local advertising, and concierge services. The Company also sells, installs and services
hardware for wired networking solutions and wireless fidelity networking solutions, also known as Wi-Fi, for high-speed internet access to hotels, resorts, and time share locations. The Company installs and creates services that address the productivity and communications needs of hotel, resort and time share guests, as well as residential consumers. The Company may utilize third party contractors to install such hardware and software.
Basis of Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include Roomlinx, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Canadian Communications LLC, Cardinal Connect, LLC, Cardinal Broadband, LLC, and Arista Communications, LLC, a 50% subsidiary, controlled by the Company. Canadian Communications and Cardinal Connect, LLC, are non-operating entities. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassification:
Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Management Plans:
The Company has experienced recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations. At December 31, 2012, the Company had approximate balances of cash and cash equivalents of $3,211,000, working capital of $1,701,000, total deficit of $384,000 and accumulated deficit of $37,572,000. To date the Company has in large part relied on debt and equity financing to fund its shortfall in cash generated from operations. Management is closely monitoring the cash balances, cash needs and expense levels. Management expects to draw on its line of credit, as necessary, to assist in funding operations through December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has available approximately $19,800,000 under its line of credit which could be limited by the covenant and financial covenant requirements.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value Measurement:
The Company discloses fair value information about financial instruments based on a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.
The respective carrying value of certain financial instruments approximate their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, leases receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, capital lease obligations, notes payable and the line of credit. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, leases receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short term nature. The carrying amount of capital lease obligations and notes payable approximates their fair values as the pricing and terms of these liabilities approximate market rates.
The fair value of the line of credit is not practicable to estimate because of the related party nature of the underlying transactions. The Company has no financial instruments with the exception of cash and cash equivalents (level 1) valued on a recurring basis.
Cash and cash equivalents
:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. From time to time, the Company’s cash account balances exceed the balances as covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance System. The Company has never suffered a loss due to such excess balances.
43
Accounts Receivable:
Accounts receivables are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to the customer. Accounts receivable in excess of 30 days old are considered delinquent. Outstanding customer invoices are periodically assessed for collectability. The assessment and related estimate are based on current credit-worthiness and payment history. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded an allowance in the amount of $229,000 and $72,000, respectively.
Inventory:
Inventory, principally large order quantity items which are required for the Company’s media and entertainment installations, is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) basis or market. The Company generally maintains only the inventory necessary for contemplated installations. Work in progress represents the cost of equipment and third party installation related to installations which were not yet completed.
The Company performs an analysis of slow-moving or obsolete inventory periodically and any necessary valuation reserves, which could potentially be significant, are included in the period in which the evaluations are completed. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the inventory obsolescence reserve was mainly related to raw materials and results in a new cost basis for accounting purposes.
Leases Receivable:
Leases receivable represent direct sales-type lease financing to cover the cost of installation. These transactions result in the recognition of revenue and associated costs in full upon the customer’s acceptance of the installation project and give rise to a lease receivable equal to the gross lease payments and unearned income representing the implicit interest in these lease payments. Unearned income is amortized over the life of the lease to interest income on a monthly basis. The carrying amount of leases receivable are reduced by a valuation allowance that reflects the Company’s best estimate of the amounts that may not be collected. This estimate is based on an assessment of current creditworthiness and payment history. As of December 31, 2012 an allowance was recorded in the amount of $135,000. No such allowance was recorded as of December 31, 2011.
Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally five years for leasehold improvements, hospitality and residential equipment, and three years for computer related assets.
Long-Lived Assets:
The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value.
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue is derived from the installation and ongoing services of in-room media, entertainment, and HD television programming solutions in addition to wired networking solutions and WiFi Fidelity networking solutions. Revenue is recognized when all applicable recognition criteria have been met, which generally include a) persuasive evidence of an existing arrangement; b) fixed or determinable price; c) delivery has occurring or service has been rendered; d) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured.
Installations and service arrangements are contractually predetermined and such contractual arrangements may provide for multiple deliverables, revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 650, Multiple Deliverable Revenue. The application of ASC Topic 650 may result in the deferral of revenue recognition for installations across the service period of the contract and the re-allocation and/or deferral of revenue recognition across various service arrangements. Below is a summary of such application of the revenue recognition policy as it relates to installation and service arrangements the Company has with its customers.
44
The Company enters into contractual arrangements to provide multiple deliverables which may include some or all of the following - systems installations and a variety of services related to high speed internet access, free-to-guest, video on demand and iTV systems as well as residential phone, internet and television. Each of these elements must be identified and individually evaluated for separation. The term “element” is used interchangeably with the term “deliverable” and the Company considers the facts and circumstances as it relates to its performance obligations in the arrangement and includes product and service elements, a license or right to use an asset, and other obligations negotiated for and assumed in the agreement. Analyzing an arrangement to identify all of the elements requires the use of judgment. In the determination of the elements included in Roomlinx agreements, embedded software and inconsequential or perfunctory activities were taken into consideration.
Once the Deliverables have been identified, we determine the Relative Fair Value of each Element under the concept of Relative Selling Price (RSP) for which the Company applied the hierarchy of selling price under ASC Topic 605 as follows:
VSOE -
Vendor specific objective evidence is still the most preferred criteria with which to establish fair value of a deliverable. VSOE is the price of a deliverable when a company sells it on an open market separately from a bundled transaction.
TPE -
Third party evidence is the second most preferred criteria with which to establish fair value of a deliverable. The measure for the pricing of this criterion is the price that a competitor or other third party sells a similar deliverable in a similar transaction or situation.
RSP -
Relative selling price is the price that management would use for a deliverable if the item were sold separately on a regular basis which is consistent with company selling practices. The clear distinction between RSP and VSOE is that under VSOE, management must sell or intend to sell the deliverable separately from the bundle, or has sold the deliverable separately from the bundle already. With RSP, a company may have no plan to sell the deliverable on a stand-alone basis.
Hospitality Installation Revenues
Hospitality installations include High Speed Internet Access (HSIA), Interactive Television (iTV), Free to Guest (FTG) and Video on Demand (VOD). Under the terms of these typical product sales and equipment installation contracts, a 50% deposit is due at the time of contract execution and is recorded as deferred revenue. Upon the completion of the installation process, deferred revenue is realized. However, in some cases related to VOD installations or upgrades, the Company extends credit to customers and records a receivable against the revenue recognized at the completion of the installation.
Additionally, the Company may provide the customer with a lease financing arrangement provided the customer has demonstrated its credit worthiness to the satisfaction of the Company. Under the terms and conditions of the lease arrangements, these leases have been classified and recorded as Sale-Type Leases under ASC Topic 840-30 and accordingly, revenue is recognized upon completion and customer acceptance of the installation which gives rise to a lease receivable and unearned income.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded $9,034,223 and $2,132,325 of product and installation revenue, respectively.
Hospitality Service, Content and Usage Revenues
The Company provides ongoing 24x7 support to both its hotel customers and their guests, content and maintenance as applicable to those products purchased, installed and serviced under contract. Generally, support is invoiced in arrears on a monthly basis with content and usage, which are dependent on guest take rates and buying habits.
Service maintenance and usage revenue also includes revenue from meeting room services, which are billed as the events occur.
Residential Revenues
Residential revenues consist of equipment sales and installation charges, support and maintenance of voice, internet, and television services, and content provider residuals, installation commissions, and management fees. Installations charges are added to the monthly service fee for voice, internet, and television, which is invoiced in advance creating deferred revenue to be realized in the appropriate period. The Company’s policy prohibits the issuance of customer credits during the month of cancelation. The Company earns residuals as a percent of monthly customer service charges and a flat rate for each new customer sign up. Residuals are recorded monthly. Commissions and management fees are variable and therefore revenue is recognized at the time of payment.
45
Concentrations
Credit Risk:
The Company’s operating cash balances are maintained in financial institutions and periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company believes that the financial strength of these institutions mitigates the underlying risk of loss. To date, these concentrations of credit risk have not had a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Accounts Receivable:
At December 31, 2012, Hyatt Corporation owned properties represent 49% and another customer represents 17% of the accounts receivable balance compared to one customer representing 35% of the accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2011.
Revenue:
During 2012, Hyatt Corporation owned properties contributed 52% of Roomlinx’s revenue compared to five customers contributing 69% of Roomlinx’s revenue in 2011.
Stock Based Compensation:
Roomlinx recognizes the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the financial statements and is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award. Stock option compensation expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (generally the vesting period). The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Segments:
We operate and prepare our financial reports based on two segments; Hospitality and Residential. We have determined these segments based on the location, design, and end users of our products.
Hospitality:
Our Hospitality segment includes hotels, resorts, and timeshare properties in the United States, Canada, and Other Foreign. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, Other Foreign included Mexico and Aruba. The products offered under our hospitality segment include the installation of, and the support and service of, high-speed internet access networks, proprietary Interactive TV platform, free to guest programming, and on-demand movie programming, as well as advertising and e-commerce products.
Residential:
Our residential segment includes multi-dwelling unit customers and business customers (non-hospitality) in the United States. The products offered include the installation of, and the support and service of, telephone, internet, and television services.
Advertising Costs:
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, advertising costs were $78,822 and $54,532, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation:
The US Dollar is the functional currency of the Company. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured into US Dollars and the resulting gains and losses are included in the consolidated statement of operations as a component of other income (expense).
Earnings Per Share:
The Company computes earnings per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of the Company’s stock options and warrants. Potentially dilutive securities, purchase stock options and warrants, are excluded from the calculation when their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, such as periods when a net loss is reported or when the exercise price of the instrument exceeds the fair market value. Accordingly, the weighted average shares outstanding have not been adjusted for dilutive shares. Outstanding stock options and warrants are not considered in the calculation as the impact of the potential common shares (totaling approximately 2,628,874 and 1,130,744 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively) would be to decrease the net loss per share.
46
Income Taxes:
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when the ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset is considered to be unlikely.
The Company uses a two-step process to evaluate a tax position. The first step is to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of any related appeals or litigation based on the technical merits of that position. The second step is to measure a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. A tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent period in which the threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not criteria should be de-recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which the threshold is no longer met. The Company reports tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.
Based on all known facts and circumstances and current tax law, the Company believes that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is not material to its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. The Company also believes that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, if recognized, would not have a material effect on its effective tax rate. The Company further believes that there are no tax positions for which it is reasonably possible, based on current tax law and policy that the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease over the next 12 months producing, individually or in the aggregate, a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing examinations by federal and state tax authorities. To date, there have been no reviews performed by federal or state tax authorities on any of the Company’s previously filed returns. The Company’s 2006 and later tax returns are still subject to examination.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards:
The Company evaluates the pronouncements of various authoritative accounting organizations, primarily the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC, and the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF ”), to determine the impact of new pronouncements on US GAAP and the impact on the Company. The following accounting standards updates were recently issued and have not yet been adopted by the Company. These standards are currently under review to determine their impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2013, the FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which is now codified under FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income.” This ASU will require entities to present, either in a note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line items effected by the reclassification. If a component is not required to be reclassified, to net income in its entirety, a company would instead cross reference to the related footnote for additional information. This guidance is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
47
2. Leases Receivable
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had leases receivable of $2,802,465, recorded net of an allowance for uncollectable leases receivable of $135,000, compared to $3,692,424 at December 31, 2011. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company received payments of $972,627 and $722,982 respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company entered into leases receivable totaling $142,879 and $2,046,356, respectively. These leases have initial terms of 60 months and an average interest rate of 9.5%. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded a loss of $60,211 related to the early termination of lease receivable contracts. This loss is net of the return of equipment to inventory and is included in direct costs in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Future minimum receipts on leases receivable are as follows:
|
Year Ended
December 31, |
Minimum Receipts
|
|||
|
2013
|
$ | 995,220 | ||
|
2014
|
854,402 | |||
|
2015
|
628,122 | |||
|
2016
|
305,671 | |||
|
2017
|
19,050 | |||
| $ | 2,802,465 | |||
3. Inventory
Inventory balances as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Raw materials
|
$ | 2,546,441 | $ | 671,991 | ||||
|
Work in process
|
882,351 | 662,081 | ||||||
| 3,428,792 | 1,334,072 | |||||||
|
Reserve for obsolescence
|
(120,000 | ) | (90,000 | ) | ||||
|
Inventory, net
|
$ | 3,308,792 | $ | 1,244,072 | ||||
4. Property and Equipment
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
$ | 17,195 | $ | 14,738 | ||||
|
Hospitality property equipment
|
745,117 | 3,011,871 | ||||||
|
Residential property equipment
|
351,727 | 351,727 | ||||||
|
Computers and office equipment
|
590,566 | 469,607 | ||||||
|
Software
|
141,807 | 61,969 | ||||||
| 1,846,412 | 3,909,912 | |||||||
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(1,055,539 | ) | (1,764,081 | ) | ||||
| $ | 790,873 | $ | 2,145,831 | |||||
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $650,615 and $695,817, respectively.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the total assets purchased under capital lease are $64,617 and $30,000 with accumulated amortization of $38,654 and $27,750, respectively. Depreciation of assets under capital lease for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $10,905 and $10,000, respectively.
48
5. Asset Impairment
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. (“CHL”) provides video-on-demand (“VOD”) services utilizing proprietary technology to approximately 130 hotel properties in Canada (“the CHL properties”). The CHL properties are primarily economy-class hotels.
During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company determined that it would no longer utilize its proprietary VOD system in future VOD service installations. Rather than invest in upgrading or refreshing its proprietary technology, the Company determined it would purchase a third-party platform for all future VOD installations. In addition, it concluded that its primary business strategy and technology development efforts will be focused on its proprietary interactive TV platform. Due to the economy class nature of the CHL properties, management determined that the interactive TV platform is not appropriate for deployment at those properties. Consequently, while services provided to the CHL properties will continue, no significant new business development will be pursued.
As a result of this strategic change we performed an evaluation as of September 30, 2012 of our long-lived assets associated with the CHL properties consisting primarily of property, plant, and equipment and property receivables. In assessing impairment for long-lived assets we followed the provisions of ASC 360. We performed our testing of the asset group at the individual property level, and our assessment included contractual terms and identifiable cash flows associated with providing on-going service.
In performing the test, we determined that the total of the expected future undiscounted cash flows directly related to services provided at the CHL properties was less than the carrying value of the asset group. Therefore, an impairment charge was required. An impairment charge of approximately $920,000 and $47,000 related to property, plant and equipment and property receivables, respectively, represented the difference between the fair values of the asset group and its carrying values and is reflected as loss on asset impairment in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2012. The impairment charges resulted from the excess of the carrying value of the asset group over the fair value (calculated based on the discounted expected future cash flows associated with VOD and free to guest services during the underlying contractual period).
In addition, we performed an analysis of the value of inventory held by CHL to determine the impact of the change in business strategy, as of September 30, 2012. We determined that a write off of approximately $146,000 was required to reflect the obsolete nature of the inventory associated with VOD service. The charge is included in the Loss on asset impairment in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2012.
6. Notes Payable
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had the following outstanding notes payable:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Note payable, assumed as part of the acquisition of Canadian Communications on October 1, 2010, monthly principal and interest payment of $537; interest at 11% per annum; and matured in March 2013.
|
$ | 1,583 | $ | 7,495 | ||||
|
Note payable to the FCC; monthly principal and interest payment of $1,188; interest at 11% per annum; and matures in August 2016.
|
41,178 | - | ||||||
|
Note payable, assumed as part of the acquisition of Canadian Communications on October 1, 2010, monthly principal and interest payment of $4,996; interest at 12% per annum; and matured in November 2012.
|
- | 51,790 | ||||||
| 42,761 | 59,285 | |||||||
|
Less: current portion
|
(10,631 | ) | (57,703 | ) | ||||
| $ | 32,130 | $ | 1,582 | |||||
49
Future minimum payments under notes payable are as follows:
|
Years Ended
|
Minimum
|
|||
|
December 31,
|
Payments
|
|||
|
2013
|
$ | 10,631 | ||
|
2014
|
10,964 | |||
|
2015
|
12,233 | |||
|
2016
|
8,933 | |||
| $ | 42,761 | |||
7. Settlement of Royalty Payable
In November 2011, the Company entered into a revised license agreement for studio films. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company was required to pay $105,000 in four equal quarterly payments to settle all previous amounts due to a studio. In August 2012, the Company made the final payment resulting in a gain on the settlement of royalty payable in the amount of $179,834, such amount representing the excess of the accrued liability less the agreed upon settlement of $105,000. The settlement of royalty payable is included in other income on the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2012.
8. Line of Credit
On June 5, 2009 we entered into a Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Cenfin LLC, an entity principally owned by significant shareholders of the Company. The Credit Agreement permits us to borrow up to $25 million until June 5, 2017. Advances must be repaid at the earlier of 5 years from the date of borrowing or at the expiration of the Credit Agreement. The principal balance may be repaid at any time without penalty. Borrowings accrue interest, payable quarterly on the unpaid principal and interest at a rate equal to the Federal Funds Rate at July 15 of each year plus 5% (approximately 5.25% at December 31, 2012). The Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our assets, and requires we maintain a total outstanding indebtedness to total assets ratio of less than 3 to 1.
Amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement were $5,176,000 and $4,176,000 at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These advances will be repaid at various dates between 2014 and 2017. A total of $19,824,000 is available for future borrowings. Interest expense, exclusive of accretion of the debt discount of $332,121 and $175,345, of $260,221 and $150,263 was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Credit Agreement requires that, in conjunction with each advance, we issue Cenfin warrants to purchase shares of Roomlinx common stock equal to 50% of the principal amount funded divided by (i) $2.00 on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings on or after July 15, 2010 ($4,712,000 as of December 31, 2012) or (ii) thereafter the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of such draw for advances in excess of $5,000,000. The exercise price of the warrants is $2.00 for the warrants issued on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings made after July 15, 2010 and, thereafter, the average of the high and low market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The exercise period of these warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.
50
Using the Black-Scholes pricing model adjusted for a blockage discount, warrants issued during the year ended December 31, 2012 were valued at approximately $350,000 (see Note 11). The fair value of warrants issued since inception of the Credit Agreement is approximately $2,760,000
which is being amortized to earnings as additional interest expense over the term of the related indebtedness, accordingly additional interest expense of $332,121 and $175,345 was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The unamortized balance of the debt discount was $1,168,823 and $1,150,777 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Borrowings outstanding are reported net of the debt discount associated with these borrowings.
Future minimum payments under the line of credit are as follows:
|
Years Ended
December 31, |
Minimum
Payments |
|||
|
2013
|
$ | - | ||
|
2014
|
464,000 | |||
|
2015
|
1,232,000 | |||
|
2016
|
2,480,000 | |||
|
2017
|
1,000,000 | |||
| $ | 5,176,000 | |||
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases:
On April 10, 2012 the Company executed a lease agreement for office space with an effective date of May 1, 2012. Terms of the lease established a base rent per square foot plus operating expenses throughout the term of the lease which expires September 30, 2015, and which includes the lessor waiving several months of base rent and pre-defined annual escalation of the base rent per square foot. The Company had a deferred rent liability of $55,025 included in other liabilities (current and non-current) as of December 31, 2012. The Company’s future minimum lease payments are as follows: for the years ended December 31, $119,741 in 2013, $136,349 in 2014 and $114,064 in 2015.
Capital Lease Obligations
: The Company has capital lease arrangements related to the acquisition of software. These arrangements are collateralized by the software and expire at varying dates through September 2015 with future minimum lease payments as follows: $13,210 for the year ended December 31, 2013; $13,210 for the year ended December 31, 2014; and $2,290 year ended December 31, 2015, less imputed interest of $2,954.
10. Income Taxes
At December 31, 2012, the Company has tax loss carry forwards approximating $12,196,000 that expire at various dates through 2031. The principal difference between the net loss for book purposes and the net loss for income tax purposes relates to expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes, including reorganization costs, impairment of goodwill, stock issued for services and amortization of debt discount.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2012, are presented below:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
|
Net operating loss carryforward - federal
|
$ | 4,147,000 | $ | 2,597,000 | ||||
|
Net operating loss carryforward - state
|
369,000 | 232,000 | ||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
387,000 | 89,000 | ||||||
|
Property and equipment
|
479,000 | 97,000 | ||||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
135,000 | - | ||||||
|
Other
|
93,000 | 60,000 | ||||||
| 5,610,000 | 3,075,000 | |||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(5,610,000 | ) | (3,075,000 | ) | ||||
| $ | - | $ | - | |||||
51
At this time, the Company is unable to determine if it will be able to benefit from its deferred tax asset. There are limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards, including a requirement that losses be offset against future taxable income, if any. In addition, IRC Section 382 may impose limitations in available NOL carryforwards related to certain transactions which are deemed to be ownership changes. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for the entire deferred tax asset. The increase in the valuation allowance was approximately $2,535,000 during 2012.
Income taxes at statutory rates are reconciled to the Company’s actual income taxes as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Federal income tax at statutory rate of 34%
|
$ | (2,514,000 | ) | $ | (592,000 | ) | ||
|
State tax net of federal tax effect
|
(222,000 | ) | - | |||||
|
Effect of permanent differences
|
224,000 | (61,500 | ) | |||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
- | 222,500 | ||||||
|
Other net
|
(23,000 | ) | 25,000 | |||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
2,535,000 | 406,000 | ||||||
| $ | - | $ | - | |||||
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing examinations by federal and state tax authorities. To date, there have been no reviews performed by federal or state tax authorities on any of the Company’s previously filed returns. The Company’s 2006 and later tax returns are still subject to examination.
11. Equity
Preferred Stock:
The Company has authorized 5,000,000 preferred shares with a $0.20 par value, of which 720,000 shares have been designated as Class A Preferred Stock. The Class A Preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $0.20 per share and is entitled to receive cumulative annual dividends at the rate of 9%, payable in either cash or additional shares of Class A Preferred Stock, at the option of the Company. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 720,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. Undeclared Class A dividends accumulated and unpaid as of December 31, 2012, were $185,160; these dividends are not included in accrued expenses.
Common Stock:
The Company has authorized 200,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. As December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 6,405,413 and 5,118,877 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
On May 4, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with certain investors (collectively, the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Investors purchased Units from the Company for a purchase price of $2.50 per Unit. Each Unit consisted of (x) one share of common stock of the Company and (y) a warrant to purchase one-half share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.75 per share, subject to adjustment as provided in the warrant. The Company sold and issued an aggregate of 1,200,000 shares of common stock to the Investors and issued warrants to the Investors for the purchase of an additional 600,000 shares of common stock. Subsequently on June 20, 2012, the Company sold and issued an additional 80,000 shares of common stock and 40,000 warrants to certain other investors pursuant to an amendment to the SPA. In the aggregate, the Company received net proceeds of $2,993,311 (gross proceeds of $3,200,000 less $206,689 of offering expenses) from these transactions. Proceeds from such transactions have been and will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes including deployment of the Company’s iTV applications under the Master Service Agreement with Hyatt Corporation.
52
Management reviewed the accounting treatment for the warrants issued under the SPA and determined the warrants met the applicable requirement under ASC 815-40-25 for equity classification. Accordingly, these warrants are classified within equity as of December 31, 2012. Under the terms of a Registration Rights Agreement (“RRA”) between the Company and the Investors in conjunction with the SPA, the Company filed a Form S-1 Registration Statement with the SEC on June 18, 2012, for the purpose of registering under the Securities Act the shares of common stock issued pursuant to the SPA and the shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of the warrants issued pursuant to the SPA. Such registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on August 30, 2012.
Subsequent to year end and
effective
January 1, 2013, the Company entered into Restricted Stock Agreements with its non-employee directors. Under the agreements, the Company issued 24,000 shares of restricted common stock. The shares vest in equal installments on August 27, 2013, August 27, 2014 and August 27, 2015, subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of a change in control with respect to the Company.
Warrants:
During the year ended December 31, 2012, 250,000 warrants were granted pursuant to the clauses in the Cenfin Credit Agreement. The warrants were issued at an exercise price of $2.00, vested immediately, and expire 3 years from the date of grant. In addition, 640,000 warrants were issued pursuant to clauses in the Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 4, 2012 at an exercise price of $3.75, vested immediately, and expire 3 years from the grant date.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, 620,000 warrants were granted pursuant to the Credit Agreement. The warrants were issued at an exercise price of $2.00, vested immediately, and expire at 3 years from the grant dates
as follows: 65,000 warrants issued on March 3, 2011; 50,000 warrants issued on April 22, 2011; 62,500 warrants issued on June 13, 2011; 30,000 warrants issued on July 28, 2011; 150,000 warrants issued on August 9, 2011; 112,500 warrants issued on September 13, 2011; and 150,000 warrants issued on October 31, 2011
. In addition, an aggregate of 62,500 warrants previously issued under the Credit Agreement were exercised. The warrants were exercised at a strike price of $2.00 resulting in cash receipts of $125,000.
The weighted average grant date fair value of such warrants was $2.02.
The following are assumptions utilized in estimation of the fair value of the warrants granted during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Term
|
3 years
|
3 years
|
||||||
|
Expected volatility
|
136% - 148 | % | 122% - 125 | % | ||||
|
Risk free interest rate
|
0.35% - 0.57 | % | 0.33% - 1.18 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield
|
0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
The following is a summary of such outstanding warrants for the year ended December 31, 2012:
|
Warrants
|
Shares
Underlying Warrants |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
Weighted
Remaining Contractual Life (in years) |
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value |
||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2012
|
726,550 | $ | 2.21 | |||||||||||||
|
Granted and Issued
|
890,000 | 3.26 | ||||||||||||||
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
(73,750 | ) | 3.15 | |||||||||||||
|
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2012
|
1,542,800 | $ | 2.84 | 1.97 | $ | 41,300 | ||||||||||
53
Options:
In 2004, the Company adopted a long term incentive stock option plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) which covers key employees, officers, directors and other individuals providing bona fide services to the Company. On December 27, 2012, subject to stockholder approval, the board of directors voted to amend the Stock Option Plan to (i) adjust the maximum allowable shares of common stock upon exercise of options which may be granted from 1,200,000 to 2,000,000 shares of common stock and (ii) remove the provision from the Stock Option Plan which provided that any shares that are surrendered to or withheld by the Company in connection with any award or that are otherwise forfeited after issuance shall not be available for purchase pursuant to incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of December 31, 2012, options to purchase 1,086,074 shares were outstanding. The options vest as determined by the Board of Directors and are exercisable for a period of no more than 10 years.
Pursuant to the execution of the Hyatt MSA, on March 14, 2012 the board of directors approved the grant of 500,000 stock options (“Hyatt options”) at a strike price of $4.00 vesting on a pro rata basis over three years or the acceleration of such vesting rights relative to installation performance metrics at the Hyatt properties as defined by the board of directors, whichever is greater, and expiring 7 years from the date of grant. On December 27, 2012, the board of directors approved re-pricing the Hyatt options from the exercise price of $4.00 per share to $2.10 per share ($0.10 above the closing price per the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin as of that date).
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the board of directors approved the grant of an aggregate of 516,247 Incentive Stock Options and 405,570 Non-Qualified Stock Options. Such options were issued at exercise prices between $2.00 and $2.90, vest at various times over three years, and expire 7 years from the grant date.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the board of directors approved
the grant of 10,000 and 30,000 Incentive Stock Options issued on July 7, 2011 at a weighted average exercise price of $3.75 and issued on September 11, 2011 at a weighted average exercise price of $3.30, respectively
.
These options vest on the anniversary date over a two year period and expire 7 years from the grant date.
The weighted average grant date fair value of such options was $2.97.
The following are the assumptions utilized in the estimation of stock-based compensation related to the stock option grants for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Expected term
|
7 years
|
7 years
|
||||||
|
Expected volatility
|
214% - 225 | % | 132 | % | ||||
|
Risk free interest rate
|
1.11% - 1.69 | % | 1.14% - 2.48 | % | ||||
|
Dividend yield
|
0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
A summary of stock option activity under the Stock Option Plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 is presented below:
|
Options
|
Number of
Shares |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
Remaining
Contractual Life (in years) |
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value |
||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2012
|
404,194 | $ | 2.78 | |||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
921,817 | 2.16 | ||||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(14,000 | ) | 1.33 | |||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(225,937 | ) | 3.64 | |||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
1,086,074 | $ | 3.12 | 5.77 | $ | 26,850 | ||||||||||
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2012
|
322,711 | $ | 2.74 | 3.60 | $ | 26,850 | ||||||||||
54
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $526,665 and $292,620 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The amounts are recorded in direct costs, operations, product development and selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss). The fair value of stock options that vested and became exercisable during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $31,897 and $162,080 respectively. At December 31, 2012, there was approximately $1,200,627 in unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options that will be recorded over a weighted average future period of approximately 3 years.
A summary of the activity of non-vested options under the Company’s plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 is presented below:
|
Non-vested
Shares Underlying Options |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value |
||||||||||
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2012
|
63,296 | $ | 3.68 | $ | 2.98 | |||||||
|
Granted
|
921,817 | 2.16 | 2.28 | |||||||||
|
Vested
|
(13,730 | ) | 3.58 | 2.22 | ||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(208,020 | ) | 3.76 | 2.94 | ||||||||
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2012
|
763,363 | $ | 2.16 | $ | 1.95 | |||||||
55
12. Segment Information
Financial information for our segment as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, is as follows:
|
Hospitality
|
Residential
|
Corporate
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 12,700,811 | $ | 915,054 | $ | - | $ | 13,615,865 | ||||||||
|
Operating loss
|
(5,375,019 | ) | (207,473 | ) | (1,675,564 | ) | (7,258,056 | ) | ||||||||
|
Depreciation expense
|
(509,753 | ) | (59,012 | ) | (81,850 | ) | (650,615 | ) | ||||||||
|
Stock based compensation
|
(184,581 | ) | (568 | ) | (341,516 | ) | (526,665 | ) | ||||||||
|
Loss on asset impairment
|
(1,112,470 | ) | - | - | (1,112,470 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Gain on settlement of royalty payable
|
179,834 | - | - | 179,834 | ||||||||||||
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
- | - | 201,480 | 201,480 | ||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (5,174,151 | ) | $ | (207,473 | ) | $ | (2,010,110 | ) | $ | (7,391,734 | ) | ||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 5,281,608 | $ | 942,317 | $ | - | $ | 6,223,925 | ||||||||
|
Operating loss
|
(1,729,305 | ) | (26,614 | ) | (957,369 | ) | (2,713,288 | ) | ||||||||
|
Depreciation expense
|
(597,873 | ) | (53,844 | ) | (44,100 | ) | (695,817 | ) | ||||||||
|
Stock based compensation
|
(208,349 | ) | - | (270,885 | ) | (479,234 | ) | |||||||||
|
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
144,810 | - | - | 144,810 | ||||||||||||
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
120,867 | 52,293 | 1,517 | 174,677 | ||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (1,511,574 | ) | $ | (26,614 | ) | $ | (1,116,207 | ) | $ | (2,654,395 | ) | ||||
|
As of December 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 11,363,514 | $ | 286,891 | $ | 205,312 | $ | 11,855,717 | ||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 8,065,489 | $ | 281,356 | $ | 178,588 | $ | 8,525,433 | ||||||||
Financial information of geographical data by segment as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, is as follows:
|
United States
|
Canada
|
Other Foreign
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Hospitality Revenue
|
$ | 11,928,694 | $ | 629,143 | $ | 142,974 | $ | 12,700,811 | ||||||||
|
Residential Revenue
|
915,054 | - | - | 915,054 | ||||||||||||
|
Totals
|
$ | 12,843,748 | $ | 629,143 | $ | 142,974 | $ | 13,615,865 | ||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Hospitality Revenue
|
$ | 3,909,726 | $ | 1,170,319 | $ | 201,563 | $ | 5,281,608 | ||||||||
|
Residential Revenue
|
942,317 | - | - | 942,317 | ||||||||||||
|
Totals
|
$ | 4,852,043 | $ | 1,170,319 | $ | 201,563 | $ | 6,223,925 | ||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 11,222,082 | $ | 527,920 | $ | 105,715 | $ | 11,855,717 | ||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 6,421,065 | $ | 681,082 | $ | 1,423,286 | $ | 8,525,433 | ||||||||
Roomlinx’s Canadian hospitality revenue is dependent on a significant customer. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, such customer accounted for 51% and 45%, respectively, of annual revenue.
56
13. Arista Communications, LLC.
Roomlinx, Inc. has a 50% joint venture ownership in, and manages the operations for Arista Communications, LLC (“Arista”). The other 50% of Arista is owned by Wiens Real Estate Ventures, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Weins”). Roomlinx acquired its 50% interest in Arista through its acquisition of Canadian Communications, LLC, on October 1, 2010.
Arista provides telephone, internet, and television services to residential and business customers located in the Arista community in Broomfield, Colorado. As the operations manager for Arista, in accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation, the Company determined that Arista is a variable interest entity that must be consolidated, Roomlinx reports 100% of Arista revenues and expenses in its statement of comprehensive income (loss) and 100% of Arista assets, liabilities, and equity transactions on its balance sheet. Roomlinx then records the non-controlling interest allocation.
Financial information for Arista Communications, LLC, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and the 2011 is as follows:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 92,374 | $ | 111,146 | ||||
|
Direct Costs
|
(66,378 | ) | (79,459 | ) | ||||
|
Operating expense
|
(37,523 | ) | (36,109 | ) | ||||
|
Non-operating income
|
(11,527 | ) | (4,422 | ) | ||||
|
Non-operating income
|
10 | |||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (11,527 | ) | $ | (4,412 | ) | ||
Weins’ share of the net loss is $5,763 and $2,206 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
14. Contingent Liabilities
The Company is in receipt of a District Court Civil Summons, dated May 29, 2012, in the matter of “CLC Networks, Inc. and Skada Capital, LLC v. Roomlinx, Inc.”, commenced in the District Court of Boulder County, Colorado (the “Action”). The plaintiffs in the Action claim that the Company owes them certain unpaid sales commissions, including with respect to Hyatt Corporation in connection with that certain Master Services and Equipment Purchase Agreement, as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2012. The Company believes the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit. The Action is currently pending.
Other than the foregoing, no material legal proceedings to which the Company (or any officer or director of the Company, or any affiliate or owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of the Common Stock, to management’s knowledge) is party to or to which the property of the Company is subject is pending, and no such material proceeding is known by management of the Company to be contemplated.
15. Related Party Transactions
Effective July 25, 2011, Roomlinx entered into a consulting arrangement for marketing services with TRG, Inc., an entity owned by Michael S. Wasik, the CEO and Chairman of Roomlinx. The marketing services were to be performed by Chris Wasik, the wife of Mr. Wasik. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, Roomlinx had paid TRG $94,950 and $14,535, respectively, for services performed in accordance with said arrangement. At the beginning of December 2012, Chris Wasik became an employee of Roomlinx as its Director of Marketing with a salary of $85,000 per annum, effectively severing the consulting arrangement with TRG.
57
The wife of Jason Andrew Baxter, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, provides certain contract and financial services to the Company through Baxter Facilities, LLC, a limited liability company co-owned by Mr. Baxter. The Company has paid Baxter Facilities, LLC $46,321 for its services since March of 2012.
16. Subsequent Event
In March 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt entered into the MSA which provided for, among other things, the obligation of Hyatt to order and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company’s iTV product in a minimum number of rooms in Hyatt hotels within certain time frames measured from March 2012, subject to Roomlinx’s satisfaction of certain other conditions of the MSA.
In December of 2012, Hyatt had met certain obligations to place orders with Roomlinx for its systems and services. In December 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt mutually agreed to suspend certain Hyatt obligations under the MSA that had not been met, including the suspension of the obligations of Hyatt to cause a certain number of rooms in both Hyatt owned and managed properties to place orders for Roomlinx’s iTV products within certain time frames measured from the original execution of the MSA. At the time of the December 2012 suspension of these Hyatt obligations, the Company had installed certain services and products in approximately 19,000 rooms
(including approximately 9,000 installs of its iTV product)
in Hyatt hotels and by the end of January, 2013, had executed Statements of Work with other Hyatt hotels to install its iTV product in approximately an additional 4,600 rooms, and in connection with such Statements of Work, had received deposits from such hotels in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2012, such deposits are recorded as customer deposits in the accompanying balance sheet in the amount of approximately $1,125,000.
Hyatt recently requested, in exchange for other considerations, that, among other things, Roomlinx (i) remove the obligations of Hyatt
to cause its own hotels and
to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company’s iTV product into a certain number of rooms within a certain timeframe, (ii) restructure or release the obligation of Hyatt to install iTV in a portion or all of the additional 4,600 rooms covered by such Statements of Work but not yet installed, and (iii) obtain credits or refunds of any portion of the $1.3 million of deposits held by the Company pursuant to the Statements of Work referred to above but not applied towards installations of the Company’s iTV product. The Company and Hyatt have held discussions regarding a resolution of these items. Such resolution may include, among other things, that the Company agree to certain of Hyatt’s requests in consideration for the Company being authorized as a Hyatt approved provider of multiple products and services and favorable shifts in the advertising revenue sharing arrangement between the parties. However, there are no guarantees that the parties will reach a resolution of these items at all or on the terms summarized above or that the suspension of obligations referred to in the preceding paragraph will end. Hyatt Hotels continues to place orders for certain Roomlinx products and services.
At December 31, 2012, the Company had approximately $1.7 million of inventory related to the installation of its iTV product, on which the Company performed an impairment analysis. This equipment was purchased in the second half of 2012 and has a useful life of 36 months during which time the equipment will be deployed for the installation of iTV and will be held for sale as spare parts. Accordingly, the Company does not believe an impairment of this inventory is appropriate as of December 31, 2012.
In addition, the Company assessed its cash flow through December 31, 2013 versus its borrowing capacity under the Cenfin Line of Credit Facility. While the Company’s installation backlog continues to grow, the Company assessed its cash flow exclusive of such installations, thereby assuming a very conservative approach to maximize the potential draw against the Company’s line of credit, and determined its line of credit is more than sufficient to fund operations, it necessary.
None.
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were inadequate as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over its financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In undertaking this assessment, management used the criteria established by the Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission contained in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework.
As of December 31, 2012, based on management
’
s assessment as described above, we have determined that the Company did not maintain effective controls over financial reporting. Specifically, due to the limited number of individuals within our accounting and finance department and department turn-over in the fourth quarter, we had a lack of adequate resources, including headcount, to ensure timely identification, resolution and recording of accounting matters. Since these controls have a pervasive effect across the organization, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. We have begun to implement and will continue to implement appropriate processes and measures to remediate this material weakness, which will include the installation of a permanent Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, and a restructuring of the organizational chart that clearly defines the CFO
’
s authority across the organization.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None
58
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the full Board of Directors met eight times, the Audit Committee met five times and the Compensation Committee met three times. During 2012, all directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees thereof on which they served. The Company encourages each member of the Board of Directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. All of the directors attended the Company’s 2012 annual meeting of stockholders.
Each member of the Audit and Compensation Committees has been determined to be independent as discussed below under Independence of Directors.
The following table sets forth the names, positions and ages of our executive officers and directors as of March 30, 2012; directors serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualify. Officers are elected by the board of directors and their terms of offices are, except to the extent governed by employment contracts, at the discretion of the board of directors. There is no family relationship between any director, executive officer or person nominated or chosen by the Company to become a director or executive officer.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Michael S. Wasik
|
43
|
CEO and Chairman
|
|
Alan Fine
|
59
|
Interim Principal Accounting Officer and interim CFO
|
|
Jason Andrew Baxter
|
35
|
COO
|
|
Jay Coppoletta
|
34
|
Director
|
|
Carl R. Vertuca, Jr.
|
65
|
Director
|
|
Erin L. Lydon
|
43
|
Director
|
Michael S. Wasik has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors since November 2, 2005. Mr.
Wasik joined the Roomlinx Executive Management team in August of 2005 after executing the merger of his company, SuiteSpeed, with Roomlinx. During Mr. Wasik’s first three years as CEO, he successfully restructured Roomlinx’ balance sheet, eliminating debt and raising just under ten million dollars in debt and equity financing. He also took Roomlinx from a non-reporting, pink sheet company to a fully reporting company with the SEC currently trading on the OTC exchange. Currently Mr. Wasik is responsible for leading Roomlinx, which includes the development and market penetration of Roomlinx’ newest product, Roomlinx Interactive
TV.
Prior to the Roomlinx merger, Wasik was the CEO/Founder of SuiteSpeed Inc. a wireless Internet provider within the hospitality market. Having launched SuiteSpeed in late 2002, Wasik was responsible for defining technology architecture, market direction, and the overall vision for this fast growing WiFi company. Wasik expanded the company’s geographical coverage from its Denver backyard to serving hotel chains and independents across the U.S. Under his direction, SuiteSpeed was on Mercury’s top 100 fastest growing companies list for 2003 and 2004.
Wasik is also the Founder and Chairman of the Board of TRG Inc., an IT consulting company. Having launched TRG in late 1997 with no outside funding, Mr. Wasik was responsible for the overall sales and marketing effort, and defined TRG’s overall vision. Under his leadership, the company achieved average growth of 300% per year, over the first four years with positive EBITDA. Mr. Wasik expanded the company’s billable resources from 6 consultants in 1997 to 60 consultants in 2000 serving Fortune 500 corporations across the U.S. Mr. Wasik has managed over 60 people in 4 offices throughout the United States.
59
Mr. Wasik was nominated for the 2005 Ernst and Young Entrepreneur of the Year award.
Alan Fine previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of Pearlstine Distributors, a privately held distributor of Anheuser Busch, Samuel Adams, Heineken, New Belgium and other craft beers to the Charleston, South Carolina market from 2008 through 2011. In addition to serving as the Chief Financial Officer, during his first year with Pearlstine Distributors, Mr. Fine served as the Director of Operations with respect to the re-engineering of warehouse operations and overseeing certain warehouse additions. Mr. Fine joined the Company in 2011, assuming the role of Vice President of Finance and in January 2013 was appointed as interim Chief Financial Officer and interim Principal Accounting Officer of the Company.
Jason Andrew Baxter previously served as a Finance Director of CH2M Hill Limited, an engineering construction company from 2004 through 2009. From 2009 through 2010, Mr. Baxter was employed as an Operations and Finance Director of Echostar Corporation, a telecommunications company. Mr. Baxter has also served as an Advisor for WestBridge Terminals, LLC since 2010 and as an Advisor for Cianbro Construction, LLC since 2011. Mr. Baxter was retained as a Vice President of the Company in May of 2012 and was appointed as an Executive Vice President of the Company in December of 2012. In January of 2013, Mr. Baxter was appointed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company.
Jay Coppoletta is the Chief Legal Officer of PEAK6 Investments, L.P., a position he has held since February 2010. PEAK6 Investments, L.P. is a Chicago based financial institution engaged in proprietary trading, asset management and retail brokerage services. Prior to joining PEAK6, Mr. Coppoletta was an associate in the Chicago office of Sidley Austin LLP for over six years. Sidley Austin LLP is an international law firm with over fifteen offices and 1,600 attorneys. Mr. Coppoletta’s practice while at Sidley Austin LLP focused on mergers and acquisitions and counseling boards of directors of public companies. Mr. Coppoletta is a member of the state bar of Illinois and graduated magna cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was a member of the Law Review, in 2003. Mr. Coppoletta received a Bachelor of Arts summa cum laude from Loyola University Chicago in 2000
.
Mr. Coppoletta provides the Roomlinx Board of Directors with experience in corporate governance matters and strategic transactions.
Carl R. Vertuca, Jr. previously served as the Executive Vice President of Finance, Administration and Corporate Development at the DII Group Inc. from March 1993 to April 2000. Mr. Vertuca was instrumental in sale of the DII Group to Flextronics Holdings USA, Inc. in April 2000 for more than $4 billion. Prior to the DII Group, Mr. Vertuca held various senior level management positions in manufacturing, engineering and finance at IBM Corporation and StorageTek Corporation. In addition, Mr. Vertuca has served on multiple company boards and served as the chairman of the audit committee at both public and private companies. Mr. Vertuca received his Associate of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering, Bachelor of Science Degree in Business and a Master of Business Administration Degree from the University of Kentucky.
Erin L. Lydon is a Director at Marbles: The Brain Store, a national retailer based in Chicago. Previously, she served as a Vice President at the JP Morgan Private Bank where she oversaw $400 million in assets. Prior to joining JP Morgan, she was the Director of Development at Northwestern Memorial Foundation where she led fundraising initiatives for 17 community organizations comprised of 525 board members, representing Chicago’s leading executives in legal, finance, medical and manufacturing professions. As the Foundation’s youngest appointed director, she consulted and negotiated with hospital senior management, physicians and board leadership on philanthropic priorities and strategies. Erin earned her Master of Business Administration Degree in Finance from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in 1999. She graduated cum laude from Bates College in 1992 with a Bachelor of Arts in English. She has served on several non-profit committees including the Bates College Alumni Council.
Independence of Directors
The Board of Directors has determined that Jay Coppoletta, Carl R. Vertuca, Jr. and Erin L. Lydon are “independent” as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200.
60
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
To our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has during the past ten years (i) been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (ii) had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time; (iii) been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; (iv) been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated; (v) been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or (vi) been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Company has an Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the current members of which are Carl R. Vertuca, Jr. and Erin L. Lydon. The Audit Committee has the following principal duties: (i) reviewing with the independent outside auditors the plans and results of the audit engagement; (ii) reviewing the adequacy of the internal accounting controls and procedures; (iii) monitoring and evaluating the financial statements and financial reporting process; (iv) reviewing the independence of the auditors; and (v) reviewing the auditors’ fees. As contemplated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission there under, the Audit Committee has assumed direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent auditors in accordance with the timetable established with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Carl R. Vertuca, Jr. is the Company’s Audit Committee Chairman and financial expert.
Audit Committee Report
Management is responsible for the Company’s internal control and financial reporting process, and for making an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. GHP Horwath, P.C. is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for overseeing the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices of the Company.
61
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s consolidated financial statements with management and with GHP Horwath, P.C., the Company’s independent registered public accountants. Management has represented to the Audit Committee that the consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Also the Audit Committee discussed with GHP Horwath, P.C. the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amend (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T. The Audit Committee has also received from GHP Horwath, P.C. the written communication and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding GHP Horwath, P.C.’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee has discussed with GHP Horwath, P.C. their independence,
the Committee took into consideration the amount and nature of the fees paid to this firm for non-audit services
.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the December 31, 2012 audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2012.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Carl R. Vertuca, Jr.
Erin Lydon
Dated March 30, 2013
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee is responsible for providing assistance to the Board in the discharge of its responsibilities relating to compensation and development of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews, adopts, terminates, amends or recommends to the Board the adoption, termination or amendment of equity-based employee plans, incentive compensation plans and employee benefit plans, as further described in the Compensation Committee Charter. The Compensation Committee may use a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of Chief Executive Officer or executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant and to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms. The members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Lydon and Mr. Coppoletta.
None of the members of the Board who served on the Compensation Committee in 2012 has interlocking relationships as defined by the SEC or had any relationships requiring disclosure by Roomlinx under the SEC’s rules requiring disclosure of certain relationships and related party transactions. In 2012, Mr. Wasik participated in all discussions regarding salaries and incentive compensation for all of our executive officers, except during discussions regarding his own salary and incentive compensation. Mr. Wasik made suggestions or recommendations during these discussions; however, all deliberations and determinations regarding the compensation of our executive officers were made solely by the Compensation Committee.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar functions. The Company shall provide to any person, without charge, upon request, a copy of such request. Any such request may be made by sending a written request for such code of ethics to:
Roomlinx, Inc., 11101 W 120
th
Avenue, Suite 200, Broomfield, CO 80021, Attn: Michael S. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer.
62
Communicating with the Board
Stockholders may communicate directly with the Board of Directors. All communications should be directed to the Company’s Secretary at
11101 W 120
th
Avenue, Suite 200, Broomfield, CO 80021
and should prominently indicate on the outside of the envelope that it is intended for the Board of Directors or for non-management directors. Each communication intended for the Board of Directors and received by the Secretary which is not otherwise commercial in nature will be forwarded to the specified party following its clearance through normal security procedures.
Review of Related Party Transactions
The Company does not employ specific procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related party transactions involving directors, nominees for directors, executive officers and their immediate family members, but considers such transactions on a case-by-case basis as they arise. However, the audit committee reviews any related party transaction in excess of $120,000.
Board Compensation
Employees of Roomlinx did not receive any additional compensation for serving as members of the Board or any of its committees in
2012. At the Board meeting held on December 27, 2012, the Board determined to compensate its non-employee directors beginning in 2013 by issuing restricted stock having a fair market value of $12,000 per annum. Members of the Audit Committee are to receive additional shares of restricted stock having a fair market value of $4,000 per annum and the chairman of the Audit Committee is to receive further compensation in the form of restricted stock having a fair market value of an additional $4,000 per annum.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. During and/or with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, (i) Michael S. Wasik, the CEO and Chairman of the Company, filed two Form 4s reporting a total of three transactions on a non-timely basis, (ii) Matthew Hulsizer, a beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the Company’s Common Stock, filed one Form 4 reporting a total of ten transactions on a non-timely basis, and (iii) Jennifer Just, a beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the Company’s Common Stock, filed one Form 4 reporting a total of ten transactions on a non-timely basis. Other than as disclosed in the previous sentence, to the Company’s knowledge, no director, officer or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of registered equity securities of the Company failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
63
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation for awarded to or earned by (i) each individual serving as our chief executive officer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and (ii) each other individual that served as an executive officer at the conclusion of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and who received in excess of $100,000 in the form of salary and bonus during such fiscal year (collectively, the “named executive officers”).
|
Name and Principle Position
|
Year
|
Salary ($)
|
Bonus ($)
|
Stock Awards
($) |
Stock Based
Compensation ($) (1) |
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation |
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings |
All Other
Compensation ($) |
Total ($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S. Wasik, CEO
|
2012
|
159,900 | - | - | 152,056 | - | - | - | 311,956 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S. Wasik, CEO
|
2011
|
159,900 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 159,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Steven Sakalski, COO
|
2012
|
104,097 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 104,097 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | The amounts in this column represent the aggregate stock based compensation expense recorded for each individual in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. |
Executive Employment Arrangements
On June 5, 2009, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Michael S. Wasik, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, replacing a prior employment agreement that had expired. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Wasik continues to serve as our Chief Executive Officer for a starting base salary of $150,000 per year. In addition, Mr. Wasik is eligible for payment of a bonus based on his performance, as, when and in an amount determined by the Compensation Committee and/or the Board of Directors. Assuming the achievement of all relevant performance criteria and established milestones, Mr. Wasik will have a target annual bonus of at least 100% of his base salary plus an incentive stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of our Common Stock.
The Employment Agreement may be terminated at any time by either the Company or Mr. Wasik; provided, however, that in the event Mr. Wasik terminates for “Good Reason” or the Company terminates without “Cause”, each as defined in the Employment Agreement, then Mr. Wasik shall, on the fulfillment of certain conditions, be entitled to severance compensation equal to twelve (12) months’ salary.
At a Board meeting held on December 27, 2012, the Board approved an increase in Mr. Wasik’s base compensation per his Employment Agreement from $150,000 to $200,000 effective on January 1, 2013. All other terms and conditions as defined in Employment Agreement dated June 5, 2009 remain in effect.
64
Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End (Fiscal Year-End December 31, 2012)
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incentive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity
|
Plan
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incentive
|
Awards:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity
|
Plan
|
Market or
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incentive
|
Awards:
|
Payout
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Plan
|
Number of
|
Value of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Awards:
|
Unearned
|
Unearned
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of
|
Number of
|
Number of
|
Market
|
Shares,
|
Shares,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities
|
Securities
|
Securities
|
Number of
|
Value of
|
Units or
|
Units or
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Underlying
|
Underlying
|
Underlying
|
Shares or
|
Shares or
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unexercised
|
Unexercised
|
Unexercised
|
Option
|
Units of
|
Units of
|
Rights
|
Rights
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Options
|
Options
|
Unearned
|
Exercise
|
Option
|
Stock That
|
Stock That
|
That Have
|
That Have
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (#) | (#) |
Options
|
Price
|
Expiration
|
Have Not
|
Have Not
|
Not Vested
|
Not Vested
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
(#) |
($)
|
Date
|
Vested (#)
|
Vested ($)
|
(#) |
($)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasik
|
100,000 | - | - | $ | 2.00 |
11/20/13
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasik
|
100,000 | - | - | $ | 3.30 |
06/05/16
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasik
|
3,378 | 1,126 | - | $ | 3.10 |
04/12/17
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edouard
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Garneau
|
40,000 | - | - | $ | 3.75 |
11/17/17
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasik
|
117,500 | 117,500 | - | $ | 2.10 |
03/13/19
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasik
|
23,600 | 23,600 | - | $ | 2.90 |
06/05/19
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasik
|
10,000 | 10,000 | - | $ | 2.10 |
12/17/19
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael S.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasik
|
60,000 | 60,000 | - | $ | 2.00 |
12/26/19
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anthony
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dipaolo
|
30,000 | 30,000 | - | $ | 2.10 |
07/22/19
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anthony
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dipaolo
|
6,250 | 6,250 | - | $ | 2.00 |
12/26/19
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
65
Director Compensation Table – Fiscal Year-End December 31, 2012
|
Fees
|
Nonqualified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Earned or
|
Non-Equity
|
Deferred
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paid in
|
Stock
|
Option
|
Incentive Plan
|
Compensation
|
All Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash
|
Awards
|
Awards
|
Compensation
|
Earnings
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael Wasik
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Judson Just
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jay Coppoletta
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Erin Lydon
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Carl R Vertuca, Jr.
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock and preferred stock as of April 10, 2013, by (i) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or preferred stock; (ii) each of our directors and executive officers; and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. In determining the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by each person, shares that may be acquired by such person under options or warrants exercisable within 60 days of April 10, 2013 are deemed beneficially owned by such person and are deemed outstanding for purposes of determining the total number of outstanding shares for such person and are not deemed outstanding for such purpose for all other stockholders.
COMMON AND CLASS A PREFERRED STOCK
|
Name and Address
|
Number of
Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
Percent of
Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
Number of
Shares of Class A Preferred Stock Beneficially Owned |
Percent of
Class A Preferred Stock Beneficially Owned |
|
Michael S. Wasik
(1)
|
539,160
|
8.1%
|
0
|
*
|
|
Jay Coppoletta
|
24,127
|
*
|
0
|
*
|
|
Carl R. Vertuca, Jr.
|
10,000
|
*
|
0
|
*
|
|
Erin L. Lydon
|
8,000
|
*
|
0
|
*
|
|
Matthew Hulsizer
(2)
|
2,315,581
|
31.8%
|
0
|
*
|
|
c/o Roomlinx, Inc.
|
||||
|
11101 W 120th Avenue
|
||||
|
Broomfield, CO 80021
|
||||
|
Jennifer Just
(3
)
|
2,317,081
|
31.8%
|
0
|
*
|
|
c/o Roomlinx, Inc.
|
||||
|
11101 W 120th Avenue
|
||||
|
Broomfield, CO 80021
|
||||
|
Verition Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd.
(4
)
|
694,793
|
10.7%
|
0
|
*
|
|
c/o Maples Corporate Services Limited
|
||||
|
PO Box 309, Ugland House
|
||||
|
Grand Cayman, KY1-1104
|
||||
|
Cayman Islands
|
||||
|
All executive officers and directors
|
583,539
|
8.8%
|
0
|
*
|
|
(6 persons)
|
* less than 1%
66
|
(1) Includes (i) 291,100 outstanding shares owned by Mr. Wasik, (ii) options to purchase 100,000 shares at $2.00 per share which expire on November 20, 2013, (iii) options to purchase 100,000 shares at $3.30 per share which expire on June 5, 2016, (iv) options to purchase 2,252 shares at $3.10 per share which expire on April 12, 2017, (v) options to purchase 39,167 shares $2.10 per share which expire on April 14, 2019 and (vi) options to purchase 7,867 shares at $2.90 per share which expire on June 6, 2019. Does not include (i) options to purchase 1,126 shares at $3.10 per share which vest on April 12, 2013 and expire on April 12, 2017, (ii) options to purchase 78,333 shares at $2.10 per share which vest equally on March 14, 2013, 2014 and 2015, subject to certain performance metrics determined by the Board of Directors relating to the rollout of Roomlinx’s iTV system in Hyatt hotel rooms, (iii)
options to purchase 15,733 shares at $2.89 per share which vest equally on June 6, 2013, 2014 and 2015, and expire on June 6, 2019, (iv) options to purchase 10,000 shares at $2.10 per share which vest equally on December 18, 2013, 2014 and 2015, and expire on December 18, 2019 and (v) options to purchase 60,000 shares at $2.00 per share which vest equally on December 27, 2013, 2014 and 2015, and expire on December 27, 2019. Mr. Wasik disclaims beneficial ownership of 9,000 options granted to his wife as follows: (i) options to purchase 5,000 shares at $2.10 which vest equally on December 18, 2013, 2014 and 2015, and expire on December 18, 2019 and (ii) options to purchase 4,000 shares at $2.00 which vest equally on December 27, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
|
|
(2) Includes (i) 976,140 shares of Common Stock jointly owned with Jennifer Just, (ii) 42,441 shares of Common Stock owned by the Hulsizer Descendant Trust, (iii) 424,000 shares of Common Stock owned by Cenfin LLC, an affiliate of Jennifer Just, (iv) warrants owned by Cenfin LLC expiring at various dates between March 16, 2015 and October 31, 2014 to purchase 870,000 shares of Common Stock at $2.00 per share, and (v) 3,000 shares held as Custodian for the benefit of his child.
|
|
(3) Includes (i) 976,140 shares of Common Stock jointly owned with Matthew Hulsizer (ii) 42,441 shares of Common Stock owned by the Just Descendant Trust, (iii) 424,000 shares of Common Stock owned by Cenfin LLC, an affiliate of Jennifer Just, (iv) warrants owned by Cenfin LLC expiring at various dates between March 16, 2015 and October 31, 2014 to purchase 870,000 shares of Common Stock at $2.00 per share, and (v) 4,500 shares held as Custodian for the benefit of her children.
|
|
(4) Includes (i) 410,518 shares owned by Verition Multi Strategy Master Fund Ltd. (the “Fund”), (ii)164,695 shares owned by Wilmot Advisors LLC, and (iii) 53,180 shares owned by Ricky Soloman, (iv) warrants owned by Verition expiring on May 3, 2015 to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $3.75 per share, and (v) warrants owned by Ricky Soloman expiring on May 3, 2015 to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at $3.75 per share. Verition serves as the investment manager to the Fund, and in such capacity may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the shares held for the Fund. Nicholas Maounis is the managing partner of Verition and Ricky Soloman is the managing partner of Wilmot.
|
67
Roomlinx or one of our subsidiaries may occasionally enter into transactions with certain “related persons.” Related persons include our executive officers, directors, nominees for directors, a beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common stock and immediate family members of these persons. We refer to transactions in which the amount involved exceeded or is expected to exceed the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of the Company’s total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years and in which the related person has a direct or indirect material interest as “related person transactions.” Each related person transaction must be approved or ratified in by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Company’s policy with regards to Related Person Transactions requires that where a transaction has been identified as a related person transaction, the Audit Committee (but only non-interested members) must approve or ratify it. Management must present to such non-interested members of the Audit Committee a description of, among other things, the material facts, the interests, direct and indirect, of the related persons, the benefits to the Company of the transaction and whether any alternative transactions were available. To identify Related Person Transactions, the Company relies on information supplied by its executive officers and Directors. In the event a Director has an interest in the proposed transaction, the Director must recuse himself or herself from the deliberations and approval. In determining whether to approve, ratify or reject a related person transaction, the non-interested members of the Audit Committee look at, in light of known circumstances, whether the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as determined by them in the good faith exercise of their discretion.
The Audit Committee considers all relevant factors when determining whether to approve a related person transaction including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
●
|
the size of the transaction and the amount payable to a related person;
|
|
|
●
|
the nature of the interest of the related person in the transaction;
|
|
|
●
|
whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest, risk or cost;
|
|
|
●
|
the terms of the transaction;
|
|
|
●
|
the impact on a Director’s independence in the event the related person is a director, immediate family member of a Director or an entity with which a Director is affiliated; and
|
|
|
●
|
whether the transaction is on terms that would be available in comparable transactions with unaffiliated third parties.
|
Executive officer or director compensation which has been approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is not considered a Related Party Transaction.
Since June 5, 2009 the Company has maintained a Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Cenfin LLC, an entity principally owned by significant shareholders of the Company (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements). The Credit Agreement permits us to borrow up to $25 million until June 5, 2017. Advances must be repaid at the earlier of 5 years from the date of borrowing or at the expiration of the Credit Agreement. The principal balance may be repaid at any time without penalty. Borrowings accrue interest, payable quarterly on the unpaid principal and interest at a rate equal to the Federal Funds Rate at July 15 of each year plus 5% (approximately 5.25%). The Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our assets, and requires we maintain a total outstanding indebtedness to total assets ratio of less than 3 to 1.
The Credit Agreement requires that, in conjunction with each advance, we issue Cenfin warrants to purchase shares of Roomlinx common stock equal to 50% of the principal amount funded divided by (i) $2.00 on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings on or after July 15, 2010 ($4,712,000 as of December 31, 2012) or (ii) thereafter the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of such draw for advances in excess of $5,000,000. The exercise price of the warrants is $2.00 for the warrants issued on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings made after July 15, 2010 and, thereafter, the average of the high and low market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The exercise period of these warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.
68
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company made interest payments of $260,221 to Cenfin and Cenfin advanced the Company $1,000,000. Pursuant to these advances, the Company granted Cenfin 206,000 warrants with a strike price of $2.00 and 44,000 warrants with a strike price of $4.00.
Effective July 25, 2011, Roomlinx entered into a consulting arrangement for marketing services with TRG, Inc., an entity owned by Michael S. Wasik, the CEO and Chairman of Roomlinx. The marketing services were to be performed by Chris Wasik, the wife of Mr. Wasik. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, Roomlinx had paid TRG $94,950 and $14,535, respectively, for services performed in accordance with said arrangement. At the beginning of December 2012, Chris Wasik became an employee of Roomlinx as its Director of Marketing with a salary of $85,000 per annum, effectively severing the consulting arrangement with TRG. Prior to entry into this arrangement, management briefed the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee determined that the amount expected to be paid was less than the cost of acquiring these services from another unaffiliated qualified individual.
The wife of Jason Andrew Baxter, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, provides certain contract and financial services to the Company through Baxter Facilities, LLC, a limited liability company co-owned by Mr. Baxter. The Company has paid Baxter Facilities, LLC $46,321 for its services since March of 2012.
Other than as set forth above, there were no related party transactions in 2012 and none are currently contemplated.
AUDIT AND RELATED FEES, TAX FEES AND ALL OTHER FEES
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred accounting fees for services as follows:
|
Audit
fees |
Audit
related fees |
2011 tax
return fees |
2010 tax
return fees |
Totals
|
||||||||||||||||
|
GHP Horwath
|
$ | 65,000 | $ | 35,865 | $ | 15,575 | $ | - | $ | 116,440 | ||||||||||
|
StarkSchenkein
|
5,000 | 6,000 | - | - | 11,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
Totals, 2012
|
$ | 70,000 | $ | 41,865 | $ | 15,575 | $ | - | $ | 127,440 | ||||||||||
|
StarkSchenkein
|
60,609 | 44,250 | - | 8,000 | 112,859 | |||||||||||||||
|
Totals, 2011
|
$ | 60,609 | $ | 44,250 | $ | - | $ | 8,000 | $ | 112,859 | ||||||||||
Audit related fees performed by GHP Horwath in 2012, include the review of the quarterly consolidated financial statements of Roomlinx, Inc. and Forms 10-Q related thereto, as well as the review of additional filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including Form S-1 and Form 8-K, as appropriate.
Audit related fees performed by StarkSchenkein in 2012, relate to their review of Forms 10-Q and Form S-1 pursuant to providing their consent and in 2011, their review of the quarterly consolidated financial statements of Roomlinx, Inc. and Forms 10-Q related thereto, as well as the review of additional filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including Form S-1 and Form 8-K, as appropriate.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADMINISTRATION OF THE ENGAGEMENT
Before GHP Horwath, P.C. was engaged by the Company for the 2012 audit, GHP Horwath, P.C.’s engagement and engagement letter were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.
69
(a) The following Exhibits are filed with this report or incorporated by reference:
|
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the registrant is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2010
.
|
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the registrant is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
4.1
|
Form of Convertible Debenture, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 14, 2007.
|
|
4.2
|
Form of Warrant issued to
Creative Hospitality Associates, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2008.
|
|
4.3
|
Form of Revolving Credit Note issued to Cenfin LLC, included as Exhibit A to the Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2009.
|
|
4.4
|
Form of Warrant issued to Cenfin LLC, included as Exhibit B to the Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2009.
|
|
4.5
|
Incentive Stock Option Agreement, dated June 5, 2009, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Michael S. Wasik, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2009.
|
|
10.1
|
Roomlinx, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Annex A to the definitive proxy statement filed by the registrant with the SEC on January 30, 2009.
|
|
10.2
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2007, by and among Roomlinx, Inc. and the Investors named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2007.
|
|
10.3
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 5, 2009, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Michael S. Wasik, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2009
.
|
|
10.4
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 11, 2007, by and among the registrant and the Investors named therein is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 14, 2007.
|
|
10.5
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 10, 2005 by and among the registrant, SS-R Acquisition Corp. and SuiteSpeed, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 16, 2005.
|
|
10.6
|
Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated June 5, 2009, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Cenfin LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2009
.
|
70
|
10.7
|
Debt Conversion Agreement, dated September 9, 2009, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Lewis Opportunity Fund, L.P.
, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2009
.
|
|
10.8
|
First Amendment to Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement
, dated March 10, 2010, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Cenfin LLC
, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2010
.
|
|
10.9
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated April 29, 2010, among Roomlinx, Inc., Verition Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd. and Wilmot Advisors LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2010.
|
|
10.10
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 29, 2010, among Roomlinx, Inc., Verition Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd. and Wilmot Advisors LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2010.
|
|
10.11
|
Second Amendment to Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Cenfin LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2010.
|
|
10.12
|
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, between Roomlinx, Inc. and each of its directors and officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2010.
|
|
10.13
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 18, 2010, among Roomlinx, Inc., Verition Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd., Wilmot Advisors LLC, Arceus Partnership, Ted Hagan and Josh Goldstein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2010
|
|
10.14
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 18, 2010, among Roomlinx, Inc., Verition Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd., Wilmot Advisors LLC, Arceus Partnership, Ted Hagan and Josh Goldstein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2010
|
|
10.15
|
Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2010, by and among Roomlinx, Inc., Canadian Communications, LLC, Peyton Communications, LLC, Garneau Alliance LLC, Peyton Holdings Corporation and Ed Garneau, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2010.
|
|
10.16
|
Third Amendment to Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated December 21, 2011, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Cenfin LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2011.
|
|
10.17
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 4, 2012, by and among Roomlinx, Inc. and certain Investors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2012.
|
|
10.18
|
Form of Warrant, by and between Roomlinx, Inc. and each of the Investors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2012.
|
|
10.19
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 4, 2012, by and among Roomlinx, Inc. and certain Investors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2012.
|
71
|
10.20
|
Master Services and Equipment Purchase Agreement, dated March 12, 2012, by and between Hyatt Corporation and Roomlinx, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on July 27, 2012.
|
|
10.21
|
First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 15, 2012, by and among the Company and certain Investors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2012.
|
|
10.22
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2013.
|
* 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
* 31.1 Certification of the chief executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
* 32.1 Certification of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
* Filed herewith
72
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on April 15, 2013.
|
Roomlinx, Inc.
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael S. Wasik
|
||
|
Michael S. Wasik
|
|||
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael S. Wasik
|
||
|
Michael S. Wasik
|
|||
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ Alan Fine
|
||
|
Alan Fine
|
|||
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
|||
|
and Interim Principal Accounting Officer
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ Jay Coppoletta
|
||
|
Jay Coppoletta
|
|||
|
Director
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ Carl R. Vertuca, Jr.
|
||
|
Carl R. Vertuca, Jr.
|
|||
|
Director
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ Erin L. Lydon
|
||
|
Erin L. Lydon
|
|||
|
Director
|
|||
|
Date:
|
April 15, 2013
|
||
73
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. Description Of BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertyItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchasers Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A . Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Coroporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules