NAV 10-Q Quarterly Report July 31, 2014 | Alphaminr
NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORP
ALPHAMINR

NAV 10-Q Quarter ended July 31, 2014

Balance Sheet
Cash Flow
Income Statement
Debt
NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORP
10-Qs and 10-Ks
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2021
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2021
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2020
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2020
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2020
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2020
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2019
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2019
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2019
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2019
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2018
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2018
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2018
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2018
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2017
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2017
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2017
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2017
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2016
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2016
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2016
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2016
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2015
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2015
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2015
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2015
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2014
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2014
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2014
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2014
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2013
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2013
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2013
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2013
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2012
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2012
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2012
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2012
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2011
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2011
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2011
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2011
10-K
 		Fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2010
10-Q
 		Quarter ended July 31, 2010
10-Q
 		Quarter ended April 30, 2010
10-Q
 		Quarter ended Jan. 31, 2010
PROXIES
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Jan. 6, 2020
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Dec. 19, 2018
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Dec. 20, 2017
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Dec. 21, 2016
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Dec. 22, 2015
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Dec. 29, 2014
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Jan. 24, 2014
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Jan. 18, 2013
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Jan. 20, 2012
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Jan. 14, 2011
DEF 14A
 		Filed on Jan. 12, 2010
10-Q 1 nav2014q3.htm 10-Q NAV 2014 Q3
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________________________
Form 10-Q
___________________________________________________
(Mark One)
þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2014

OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to
Commission file number 1-9618
___________________________________________________

NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________________________
Delaware
36-3359573
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2701 Navistar Drive, Lisle, Illinois
60532
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (331) 332-5000
___________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
þ
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes o No þ
As of August 31, 2014 , the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock was 81,369,994 , net of treasury shares.



NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I—Financial Information
Item 1.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II—Other Information
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.


2

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Information provided and statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements only speak as of the date of this report and Navistar International Corporation assumes no obligation to update the information included in this report.
Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:
•
estimates we have made in preparing our financial statements;
•
our development of new products and technologies;
•
anticipated sales, volume, demand, and markets for our products;
•
anticipated performance and benefits of our products and technologies, including our advanced clean engine solutions;
•
our business strategies relating to, and our ability to meet, federal and state regulatory heavy-duty diesel emissions standards applicable to certain of our engines, including the timing and costs of compliance and consequences of noncompliance with such standards, as well as our ability to meet other federal, state and foreign regulatory requirements;
•
our business strategies and long-term goals, and activities to accomplish such strategies and goals;
•
our expectations to achieve the objectives of our "Drive-to-Deliver" turnaround plan, including: (i) leading vehicle uptime, (ii) creating a lean enterprise, (iii) generating future financial growth, and (iv) improving market share profitably;
•
anticipated results from our Return-on-Invested-Capital ("ROIC") methodology and the benchmarking study to create a pathway to achieve profitability;
•
anticipated results from the realignment of our leadership and management structure;
•
anticipated benefits from acquisitions, strategic alliances, and joint ventures we complete;
•
our expectations relating to the dissolution of our Blue Diamond Truck joint venture with Ford Motor Company ("Ford") expected in February 2015;
•
our expectations and estimates relating to restructuring activities, including restructuring and integration charges and timing of cash payments related thereto, and operational flexibility, savings, and efficiencies from such restructurings;
•
our expectations relating to the possible effects of anticipated divestitures and closures of businesses;
•
our expectations relating to our cost-reduction actions, including our enterprise-wide reduction-in-force, and other actions to reduce discretionary spending;
•
our expectations relating to our ability to service our long-term debt;
•
our expectations relating to our retail finance receivables and retail finance revenues;
•
our anticipated costs relating to the implementation of our emissions compliance strategy and other product modifications that may be required to meet other federal, state, and foreign regulatory requirements;
•
liabilities resulting from environmental, health and safety laws and regulations;
•
our anticipated capital expenditures;
•
our expectations relating to payments of taxes;
•
our expectations relating to warranty costs;
•
our expectations relating to interest expense;
•
our expectations relating to impairment of goodwill and other assets;
•
our expectations relating to the outcome of our pending labor negotiations;
•
costs relating to litigation and similar matters;
•
estimates relating to pension plan contributions and unfunded pension and postretirement benefits;
•
trends relating to commodity prices; and
•
anticipated trends, expectations, and outlook relating to matters affecting our financial condition or results of operations.
These statements often include words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "estimate," or similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of performance or results and they involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are many factors that could affect our actual financial results or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to differences in our future financial results include those discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors , included within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013, which was filed on December 20, 2013, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this report. All future written and oral forward-looking statements by us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained herein or referred to above. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information as required by the federal securities laws, we do not

3

have any obligations or intention to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances in the future or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Available Information
We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Exchange Act and as a result, are obligated to file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the United States ("U.S.") Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") . We make these filings available free of charge on our website (http://www.navistar.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC. Information on our website does not constitute part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q . In addition, the SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains our annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy and information statements, and other information we electronically file with, or furnish to, the SEC. Any materials we file with, or furnish to, the SEC may also be read and/or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

4

PART I—Financial Information

Item 1.
Financial Statements
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions, except per share data)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Sales and revenues
Sales of manufactured products, net
$
2,806

$
2,820

$
7,683

$
7,905

Finance revenues
38

41

115

119

Sales and revenues, net
2,844

2,861

7,798

8,024

Costs and expenses
Costs of products sold
2,417

2,547

6,899

7,196

Restructuring charges
16

6

27

14

Asset impairment charges
4

17

173

17

Selling, general and administrative expenses
241

308

717

905

Engineering and product development costs
80

99

253

310

Interest expense
78

76

234

240

Other expense (income), net
(11
)
22

(5
)
(35
)
Total costs and expenses
2,825

3,075

8,298

8,647

Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates
2

3

5

6

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
21

(211
)
(495
)
(617
)
Income tax expense
(14
)
(16
)
(25
)
(53
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
7

(227
)
(520
)
(670
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
1

(10
)
3

(40
)
Net Income (loss)
8

(237
)
(517
)
(710
)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
10

10

30

34

Net loss attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(2
)
$
(247
)
$
(547
)
$
(744
)
Amounts attributable to Navistar International Corporation common shareholders:
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax
$
(3
)
$
(237
)
$
(550
)
$
(704
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
1

(10
)
3

(40
)
Net loss
$
(2
)
$
(247
)
$
(547
)
$
(744
)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic:
Continuing operations
$
(0.04
)
$
(2.94
)
$
(6.77
)
$
(8.76
)
Discontinued operations
0.02

(0.12
)
0.04

(0.49
)
$
(0.02
)
$
(3.06
)
$
(6.73
)
$
(9.25
)
Diluted:
Continuing operations
$
(0.04
)
$
(2.94
)
$
(6.77
)
$
(8.76
)
Discontinued operations
0.02

(0.12
)
0.04

(0.49
)
$
(0.02
)
$
(3.06
)
$
(6.73
)
$
(9.25
)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
81.4

80.6

81.3

80.4

Diluted
81.4

80.6

81.3

80.4



See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
(in millions)
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
2014
2013
2014
2013
Net loss attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(2
)
$
(247
)
$
(547
)
$
(744
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(3
)
(91
)
(17
)
(71
)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $(3), $1, $(4), and $2, respectively)
33

39

83

117

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
$
30

$
(52
)
$
66

$
46

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
28

$
(299
)
$
(481
)
$
(698
)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
July 31,
October 31,
(in millions, except per share data)
2014
2013
ASSETS
(Unaudited)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
547

$
755

Marketable securities
618

830

Trade and other receivables, net
568

737

Finance receivables, net
1,707

1,597

Inventories
1,462

1,210

Deferred taxes, net
39

72

Other current assets
202

258

Total current assets
5,143

5,459

Restricted cash
121

91

Trade and other receivables, net
26

29

Finance receivables, net
302

338

Investments in non-consolidated affiliates
72

77

Property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $2,533 and $2,440, respectively)
1,657

1,741

Goodwill
38

184

Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $106 and $97, respectively)
98

138

Deferred taxes, net
153

159

Other noncurrent assets
92

99

Total assets
$
7,702

$
8,315

LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt
$
1,020

$
1,163

Accounts payable
1,572

1,502

Other current liabilities
1,425

1,596

Total current liabilities
4,017

4,261

Long-term debt
4,184

3,922

Postretirement benefits liabilities
2,450

2,564

Deferred taxes, net
14

33

Other noncurrent liabilities
1,083

1,136

Total liabilities
11,748

11,916

Redeemable equity securities
2

4

Stockholders’ deficit
Series D convertible junior preference stock
3

3

Common stock (86.8 shares issued, $0.10 par value per share and 220 shares authorized, all at both dates)
9

9

Additional paid-in capital
2,499

2,477

Accumulated deficit
(4,610
)
(4,063
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1,758
)
(1,824
)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost (5.5 and 6.3 shares, respectively)
(225
)
(251
)
Total stockholders’ deficit attributable to Navistar International Corporation
(4,082
)
(3,649
)
Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interests
34

44

Total stockholders’ deficit
(4,048
)
(3,605
)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
$
7,702

$
8,315


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss
$
(517
)
$
(710
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
177

225

Depreciation of equipment leased to others
79

105

Deferred taxes, including change in valuation allowance
(4
)
19

Asset impairment charges
173

25

Gain on sales of investments and businesses, net
—

(13
)
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount
38

43

Stock-based compensation
12

19

Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries
12

16

Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates, net of dividends
4

5

Write-off of debt issuance cost and discount
1

6

Other non-cash operating activities
(27
)
(60
)
Changes in other assets and liabilities, exclusive of the effects of businesses disposed
(292
)
354

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(344
)
34

Cash flows from investing activities


Purchases of marketable securities
(1,210
)
(1,070
)
Sales of marketable securities
1,092

664

Maturities of marketable securities
330

164

Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents
(30
)
(9
)
Capital expenditures
(57
)
(136
)
Purchases of equipment leased to others
(157
)
(351
)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
40

22

Investments in non-consolidated affiliates
—

(25
)
Proceeds from sales of affiliates
6

50

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
14

(691
)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of securitized debt
105

279

Principal payments on securitized debt
(32
)
(501
)
Proceeds from issuance of non-securitized debt
603

390

Principal payments on non-securitized debt
(617
)
(438
)
Net increase in notes and debt outstanding under revolving credit facilities
87

87

Principal payments under financing arrangements and capital lease obligations
(20
)
(55
)
Debt issuance costs
(14
)
(16
)
Proceeds from financed lease obligations
44

276

Issuance of common stock
—

14

Proceeds from exercise of stock options
18

9

Dividends paid by subsidiaries to non-controlling interest
(40
)
(35
)
Other financing activities
—

4

Net cash provided by financing activities
134

14

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(12
)
(19
)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(208
)
(662
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
755

1,087

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
547

$
425


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
(Unaudited)
(in millions)
Series D
Convertible
Junior
Preference
Stock
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Common
Stock
Held in
Treasury,
at cost
Stockholders'
Equity
Attributable
to Non-controlling
Interests
Total
Balance as of October 31, 2013
$
3

$
9

$
2,477

$
(4,063
)
$
(1,824
)
$
(251
)
$
44

$
(3,605
)
Net income (loss)
(547
)
30

(517
)
Total other comprehensive income
66

66

Transfer from redeemable equity securities upon exercise or expiration of stock options
2

2

Stock-based compensation
7

7

Stock ownership programs
(9
)
26

17

Equity component of convertible debt instruments, net of tax expense of $16
27

27

Equity component of repurchased convertible debt instruments, net of tax benefit of $3
(5
)
(5
)
Cash dividends paid to non-controlling interest
(40
)
(40
)
Balance as of July 31, 2014
$
3

$
9

$
2,499

$
(4,610
)
$
(1,758
)
$
(225
)
$
34

$
(4,048
)
Balance as of October 31, 2012
$
3

$
9

$
2,440

$
(3,165
)
$
(2,325
)
$
(272
)
$
45

$
(3,265
)
Net income (loss)
(744
)
34

(710
)
Total other comprehensive income
46

46

Transfer from redeemable equity securities upon exercise or expiration of stock options
1

1

Stock-based compensation
14

14

Stock ownership programs
(9
)
17

8

Cash dividends paid to non-controlling interest
(35
)
(35
)
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance cost and fees
14

14

Deconsolidation of a non-controlling interest
(9
)
(9
)
Other
(1
)
(1
)
Balance as of July 31, 2013
$
3

$
9

$
2,459

$
(3,909
)
$
(2,279
)
$
(255
)
$
35

$
(3,937
)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
9

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Description of the Business
Navistar International Corporation ("NIC"), incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1993 , is a holding company whose principal operating entities are Navistar, Inc. and Navistar Financial Corporation ("NFC"). References herein to the "Company," "we," "our," or "us" refer collectively to NIC and its consolidated subsidiaries, including certain variable interest entities ("VIEs") of which we are the primary beneficiary.
Our fiscal year ends October 31. As such, all references to 2014 and 2013 contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate to our fiscal year, unless otherwise indicated.
We operate in four principal industry segments: North America Truck, North America Parts, Global Operations (collectively called "Manufacturing operations"), and Financial Services, which consists of NFC and our foreign finance operations (collectively called "Financial Services operations"). These segments are discussed in Note 13, Segment Reporting .
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of our Manufacturing operations, which include majority-owned dealers ("Dealcors"), and our Financial Services operations, including VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary. The effects of transactions among consolidated entities have been eliminated to arrive at the consolidated amounts.
Certain reclassifications were made to prior period amounts to conform to the 2014 presentation, which relate to the realignment of our reporting segments that became effective during the fourth quarter of 2013.
We prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States ("U.S.") generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial information and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for comprehensive annual financial statements.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013, which should be read in conjunction with the disclosures therein. In our opinion, these interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual operating results.
Variable Interest Entities
We have an interest in several VIEs, primarily joint ventures, established to manufacture or distribute products and enhance our operational capabilities. We have determined for certain of our VIEs that we are the primary beneficiary because we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and have the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Accordingly, we include in our consolidated financial statements the assets and liabilities and results of operations of those entities, even though we may not own a majority voting interest. The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not represent additional claims on our general assets; rather they represent claims against the specific assets of these VIEs. Assets of these entities are not readily available to satisfy claims against our general assets.
We are the primary beneficiary of our Blue Diamond Parts ("BDP") and Blue Diamond Truck ("BDT") joint ventures with Ford. As a result, our Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets of $279 million and $323 million and liabilities of $235 million and $188 million as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively, from BDP and BDT, including $48 million and $56 million of cash and cash equivalents, at the respective dates, which are not readily available to satisfy claims against our general assets. The creditors of BDP and BDT do not have recourse to our general credit. In December 2011, Ford notified the Company of its intention to dissolve the BDT joint venture effective December 2014. In September 2013, we agreed with Ford to extend the BDT joint venture through February 2015. We do not expect the dissolution of the BDT joint venture to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Our Financial Services segment consolidates several VIEs. As a result, our Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets of $1 billion and $989 million as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively, and liabilities of $828 million and $778 million as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively, all of which are involved in securitizations that are treated as asset-

10
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

backed debt. In addition, our Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets of $190 million and $61 million and corresponding liabilities of $69 million and $49 million as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively, which are related to other secured transactions that do not qualify for sale accounting treatment, and therefore, are treated as borrowings secured by operating and finance leases. Investors that hold securitization debt have a priority claim on the cash flows generated by their respective securitized assets to the extent that the related VIEs are required to make principal and interest payments. Investors in securitizations of these entities have no recourse to our general credit.
We also have an interest in other VIEs, which we do not consolidate because we are not the primary beneficiary. Our financial support and maximum loss exposure relating to these non-consolidated VIEs are not material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
We use the equity method to account for our investments in entities that we do not control under the voting interest or variable interest models, but where we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies. Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates includes our share of the net income of these entities.
Product Warranty Liability
The following table presents accrued product warranty and deferred warranty revenue activity:
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
Balance at beginning of period
$
1,349

$
1,118

Costs accrued and revenues deferred
235

342

Divestitures
—

(3
)
Currency translation adjustment
(2
)
(3
)
Adjustments to pre-existing warranties (A)(B)
65

252

Payments and revenues recognized
(391
)
(484
)
Balance at end of period
1,256

1,222

Less: Current portion
578

618

Noncurrent accrued product warranty and deferred warranty revenue
$
678

$
604

_________________________
(A)
Adjustments to pre-existing warranties reflect changes in our estimate of warranty costs for products sold in prior periods. Such adjustments typically occur when claims experience deviates from historic and expected trends. Our warranty liability is generally affected by component failure rates, repair costs, and the timing of failures. Future events and circumstances related to these factors could materially change our estimates and require adjustments to our liability. In addition, new product launches require a greater use of judgment in developing estimates until historical experience becomes available.
In the first quarter of 2014 , we recorded adjustments for changes in estimates of $52 million or $0.64 per diluted share. In the second quarter of 2014, we recorded adjustments for changes in estimates of $42 million , or $0.52 per diluted share. In the third quarter of 2014, we recognized a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $(29) million , or (0.36) per diluted share. The benefit is comprised of a benefit for changes in estimates of $(59) million , partially offset by a $30 million correction of prior-period errors, primarily related to pre-existing warranties. For more information on the errors identified, see Out-of-Period Warranty Adjustments below. The impact of income taxes on the 2014 adjustments is not material due to our deferred tax valuation allowances on our U.S. deferred tax assets.
In the first quarter of 2013 , we recorded adjustments for changes in estimates of $40 million or $0.50 per diluted share. In the second quarter of 2013, we recorded adjustments for changes in estimates of $164 million , or $2.04 per diluted share. In the third quarter of 2013, we recorded adjustments for changes in estimates of $48 million , or $0.60 per diluted share. The impact of income taxes on the 2013 adjustments is not material due to our deferred tax valuation allowances on our U.S. deferred tax assets.
(B)
In the first quarter of 2013, we recognized $13 million of charges for adjustments to pre-existing warranties for a specific warranty issue related to component parts from a supplier. Also during the first quarter of 2013, we reached an agreement for reimbursement from this supplier for this amount and other costs previously accrued. As a result of this agreement, we recognized a recovery of $27 million within Costs of products sold and recorded a receivable within Other current assets . In the second quarter of 2013, we recognized a warranty recovery of $13 million within Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax and recorded a receivable within Other current assets.

Out-of-Period Warranty Adjustments
Included in the adjustments to the product warranty liability for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 are out-of-period adjustments, which represent corrections of prior-period errors related to the accounting for product warranties. As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 and in Item 4, we concluded that a material weakness exists surrounding the validation of the completeness and accuracy of underlying data, specifically related to our warranty cost estimates. As part of our remediation efforts for our material weakness, we have performed substantive procedures to-date that identified incomplete data used in calculating our warranty accrual. The impact of the out-of-period

11
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

warranty adjustments resulted in a $30 million and a $24 million increase to the warranty liability, primarily impacting adjustments to pre-existing warranties in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2014, respectively.
Extended Warranty Programs
The amount of deferred revenue related to extended warranty programs was $437 million and $420 million at July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively. Revenue recognized under our extended warranty programs was $36 million and $96 million in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , respectively, and $23 million and $63 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but are not limited to, pension and other postretirement benefits, allowance for doubtful accounts, income tax contingency accruals and valuation allowances, product warranty accruals, asbestos and other product liability accruals, asset impairment charges, and litigation-related accruals. Actual results could differ from our estimates.
Concentration Risks
Our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows are subject to concentration risks related to concentrations of our union employees. As of July 31, 2014 , approximately 6,000 , or 68% , of our hourly workers and approximately 300 , or 5% , of our salaried workers are represented by labor unions and are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Our current master collective bargaining agreement with the UAW will expire in October 2014 and we are in negotiations with the UAW to enter into a new collective bargaining agreement. Our future operations may be affected by changes in governmental procurement policies, budget considerations, changing national defense requirements, and global, political, regulatory and economic developments in the U.S. and certain foreign countries (primarily Canada, Mexico, and Brazil).
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the amounts assigned to the net assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level on an annual basis or more frequently, if circumstances change or an event occurs that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
Qualitative factors may be assessed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment indicates that the carrying amount is more likely than not higher than the fair value, goodwill is tested for impairment based on a two-step test. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired, thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Significant judgment is applied when goodwill is assessed for impairment. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, incorporating general economic and market conditions, and selecting an appropriate control premium. The income approach is based on discounted cash flows which are derived from internal forecasts and economic expectations for each respective reporting unit.
An intangible asset determined to have an indefinite useful life is not amortized until its useful life is determined to no longer be indefinite. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Significant judgment is applied when evaluating if an intangible asset has a finite useful life. In addition, for indefinite-lived intangible assets, significant judgment is applied in testing for impairment. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, and incorporating general economic and market conditions.

12
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

During the second quarter of 2014, the economic downturn in Brazil resulted in the continued decline in actual and forecasted results for the Brazilian engine reporting unit with goodwill of $142 million and an indefinite-lived intangible asset, trademark, of $43 million . As a result, we performed an impairment analysis in the second quarter utilizing the income approach, based on discounted cash flows, which are derived from internal forecasts and economic expectations. It was determined that the carrying value of the Brazilian engine reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeded its fair value. As a result we compared the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. A decrease in the enterprise value of the reporting unit coupled with appreciation in the value of certain tangible assets, which are not recognized for accounting purposes, resulted in the determination that the entire $142 million of goodwill was impaired. In addition, we determined that the related trademark was impaired and recognized an impairment charge of $7 million . The non-cash impairment charges were included in Asset impairment charges in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Brazilian engine reporting unit is included in the Global Operations segment.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , the Company has not adopted any new accounting guidance that has had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.  This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. Our effective date is November 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact and method of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
2. Discontinued Operations and Other Divestitures
The Company is currently evaluating its portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit. To allow us to increase our focus on our North American core business, we are evaluating product lines, businesses, and engineering programs that fall outside of our core business. We are using Return on Invested Capital ("ROIC") methodology, combined with an assessment of the strategic fit to our core business, to identify areas that are under-performing. For those areas under-performing, we are evaluating whether to fix, divest, or close, and expect to realize incremental benefits from these actions in the near future.
Discontinued Operations
In the first quarter of 2013, the Company completed the idling of the Workhorse Custom Chassis ("WCC") operations, and in the second quarter of 2013, we completed the divestiture of the WCC business for an immaterial amount. The operating results of the WCC operations are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented.
Also in the first quarter of 2013, certain operations of the Monaco recreational vehicle ("RV") business ("Monaco") were determined to be held-for-sale. In May 2013, we divested substantially all of our interest in these operations of Monaco. The operating results of these operations of Monaco are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented. The cash consideration from the divestiture was $19 million . As a result of the divestiture, we impaired certain assets and recognized a loss totaling $24 million .
WCC and Monaco were not material to the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and have not been reclassified in the respective financial statements.

13
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the discontinued operations activity in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations :
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Sales and revenues, net
$
—

$
3

$
—

$
73

Income (loss) before income taxes
$
1

$
(10
)
$
3

$
(40
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
—

—

—

—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
$
1

$
(10
)
$
3

$
(40
)
We generally use a centralized approach to cash management, financing of our Manufacturing operations, and general corporate related functions, and, accordingly, do not allocate debt, interest expense, or corporate overhead to our discontinued businesses. Any debt and related interest expense of a specific entity within a business is recorded by the respective entity.
Other Divestitures
Mahindra Joint Ventures
In 2006 and 2008, we formed two joint ventures with Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. ("Mahindra") in India, which operated under the names of Mahindra Navistar Automotives Ltd. ("MNAL") and Mahindra-Navistar Engines Private Ltd. ("MNEPL") (collectively, the "Mahindra Joint Ventures"). In February 2013, the Company sold its stake in the Mahindra Joint Ventures to Mahindra for $33 million . As a result of the divestiture, the Global Operations segment recognized a gain of $26 million in 2013. As part of the transaction, the Company entered into licensing and service agreements with Mahindra.
E-Z Pack
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company sold the E-Z Pack business, which related to the production of truck refuse bodies. E-Z Pack was not material to the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Balance Sheets, or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and therefore, its operations have not been reclassified as discontinued operations in the respective financial statements.
Continental Mixer
In August 2014, the Company sold the Continental Mixer business, which produces concrete mixers. Continental was not material to the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Balance Sheets, or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and therefore, its operations have not been reclassified as discontinued operations in the respective financial statements.
3. Restructurings and Impairments
Restructuring charges are recorded on restructuring plans that have been committed to by management and are, in part, based upon management's best estimates of future events. Changes to the estimates may require future adjustments to the restructuring liabilities. In the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , the Company recognized Restructuring charges of $16 million and $27 million , respectively, compared to $6 million and $14 million , respectively, in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 .
In the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , the Company recognized Asset impairment charges of $4 million and $173 million , respectively, compared to $17 million in both the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 .
The following table reconciles our impairment charges in our Consolidated Statements of Operations :
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Goodwill impairment charge
$
—

$
—

$
142

$
—

Intangible asset impairment charge
—

—

7

—

Other asset impairment charges
4

17

24

17

Total asset impairment charges
$
4

$
17

$
173

$
17

In the second quarter of 2014, we recognized a non-cash charge of $149 million for the impairment of certain intangible assets

14
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

of our Brazilian engine reporting unit. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset of our Brazilian engine reporting unit for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that the entire $142 million balance of goodwill and $7 million of trademarks were impaired. For more information, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
In the first quarter of 2014, the Company concluded it had a triggering event related to potential sales of assets requiring assessment of impairment for certain intangible and long-lived assets in the North America Truck segment. As a result, certain amortizing intangible assets and long-lived assets were determined to be fully impaired, resulting in an impairment charge of $19 million that was recognized in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 in Asset impairment charges in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations .
Cost-Reductions and Other Strategic Initiatives
From time to time, we announce actions to control spending across the Company with targeted reductions of certain costs. We are focused on continued reductions in discretionary spending, including but not limited to reductions resulting from efficiencies, and prioritizing or eliminating certain programs or projects.
We continue to focus on improving our core North America Truck and North America Parts businesses. We continue to evaluate our portfolio of assets, with the purpose of closing or divesting non-core/non-strategic businesses, and identifying opportunities to restructure our business and rationalize our Manufacturing operations in an effort to optimize our cost structure. The Company is currently evaluating its portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit. To allow us to increase our focus on our North America core businesses, we are evaluating product lines, businesses, and engineering programs that fall outside of our core businesses. We are using a ROIC methodology, combined with an assessment of the strategic fit to our core businesses, to identify areas that are not performing to our expectations. For those areas, we are evaluating whether to fix, divest, or close. These actions could result in additional restructuring and other related charges in the future, including but not limited to: (i) impairments, (ii) costs for employee and contractor termination and other related benefits, and (iii) charges for pension and other postretirement contractual benefits and curtailments. These charges could be significant.
As a result of our ongoing evaluation of our portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit, which led to the discontinuation of certain engineering programs related to products that were determined to be outside of our core operations or not performing to our expectations, the North America Truck segment recognized certain charges, which included (i) accelerated depreciation of certain assets of $13 million in the first quarter of 2013, which impacted Cost of products sold in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations , and (ii) asset impairments of $17 million in the third quarter of 2013.
Voluntary separation program and reduction-in-force actions
In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company offered the majority of our U.S.-based non-represented salaried employees the opportunity to apply for a voluntary separation program ("VSP"). Along with the employees who chose to participate in the VSP, we used attrition and an involuntary reduction-in-force to eliminate additional positions in order to meet our targeted reductions goal. In addition to these actions in the U.S., our Brazilian operations utilized an involuntary reduction-in-force to eliminate positions.
In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company leveraged efficiencies identified through redesigning our organizational structure and began implementing new cost-reduction initiatives, including an enterprise-wide reduction-in-force. As a result of these actions, the Company recognized restructuring charges of $11 million in personnel costs for employee termination and related benefits, of which a portion was paid in 2013. The Company expects the remaining restructuring charges will be paid throughout 2014.
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company initiated new cost-reduction actions, including an enterprise-wide reduction-in-force. As a result of these actions, the Company recognized restructuring charges of $8 million in personnel costs for employee termination and related benefits, the majority of which is expected to be paid during the remainder of 2014. The Company expects the remaining restructuring charges will be paid throughout 2015.
Warrenville, Illinois Lease Vacancy
In the second quarter of 2012, the Company vacated the premises of its former world headquarters in Warrenville, Illinois. The cash payments associated with the lease vacancy obligation are expected to be completed in January 2016.
North American Manufacturing Restructuring Activities
The Company continues to evaluate opportunities to restructure and rationalize its Manufacturing operations in an effort to optimize our cost structure.

15
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Chatham restructuring activities
In the third quarter of 2011, the Company committed to close its Chatham, Ontario heavy truck plant, which had been idled since June 2009. Potential additional charges in future periods could range from $0 million to $60 million , primarily related to pension, postretirement costs and termination benefits, which are subject to employee negotiation, acceptance rates and the resolution of disputes related thereto. Based on a ruling received from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada, in the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized additional charges of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of its Chatham, Ontario plant. The Company has appealed this ruling. See Note 8, Postretirement benefits for further discussion.
Garland Facility closure
In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company committed to plans for the closure of its Garland, Texas truck manufacturing operations (the "Garland Facility"). Beginning in early 2013, the Company began transitioning production from the Garland Facility to other North America operations that produce similar models. In the second quarter of 2013, production at the Garland Facility ceased. In the first and second quarters of 2013, we recognized charges of $12 million and $8 million , respectively, for the acceleration of depreciation of certain assets related to the facility that impacted Cost of products sold in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations .
Huntsville Facility
In February 2014, the Company announced plans to consolidate its mid-range engine manufacturing footprint and relocate mid-range engine production from its Huntsville, Alabama, facility ("Huntsville Facility") to its Melrose Park, Illinois facility ("Melrose Park Facility"). As a result, in the first quarter of 2014, the North America Truck segment recognized restructuring charges of $1 million for personnel costs related to employee terminations and $2 million for inventory reserves related to the idled production equipment at the Huntsville Facility that impacted Cost of products sold in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Restructuring Liability
The following tables summarize the activity in the restructuring liability, which includes amounts related to discontinued operations and excludes pension and other postretirement contractual termination benefits:
(in millions)
Balance at October 31, 2013
Additions
Payments
Adjustments
Balance at July 31, 2014
Employee termination charges
$
15

$
12

$
(12
)
$
(2
)
$
13

Employee relocation costs
—

1

(1
)
—

—

Lease vacancy
18

1

(6
)
—

13

Other
1

—

(2
)
—

(1
)
Restructuring liability
$
34

$
14

$
(21
)
$
(2
)
$
25

(in millions)
Balance at
October 31, 2012
Additions
Payments
Adjustments
Balance at July 31, 2013
Employee termination charges
$
72

$
3

$
(54
)
$
(5
)
$
16

Employee relocation costs
—

3

(3
)
—

—

Lease vacancy
17

6

(6
)
2

19

Other
—

5

(4
)
—

1

Restructuring liability
$
89

$
17

$
(67
)
$
(3
)
$
36

4. Finance Receivables
Finance receivables are receivables of our Financial Services operations. Finance receivables generally consist of wholesale notes and accounts, as well as retail notes, finance leases and accounts. Total finance receivables reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Total assets of our Financial Services operations net of intercompany balances are $2.5 billion and $2.4 billion as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively. Included in total assets are finance receivables of $2.0 billion and $1.9 billion as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively. We have two portfolio segments of finance receivables based on the type of financing inherent to each portfolio. The retail portfolio segment represents loans or leases to end-users for the purchase or lease of vehicles. The wholesale portfolio segment represents loans to dealers to finance their inventory.

16
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Our Finance receivables, net consist of the following:
(in millions)
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
Retail portfolio
$
739

$
751

Wholesale portfolio
1,296

1,207

Total finance receivables
2,035

1,958

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
26

23

Total finance receivables, net
2,009

1,935

Less: Current portion, net (A)
1,707

1,597

Noncurrent portion, net
$
302

$
338

_________________________
(A)
The current portion of finance receivables is computed based on contractual maturities. Actual cash collections typically vary from the contractual cash flows because of prepayments, extensions, delinquencies, credit losses, and renewals.
Securitizations
Our Financial Services operations transfers wholesale notes, retail accounts receivable, retail notes, finance leases, and operating leases through special purpose entities ("SPEs"), which generally are only permitted to purchase these assets, issue asset-backed securities, and make payments on the securities. In addition to servicing receivables, our continued involvement in the SPEs may include an economic interest in the transferred receivables and, in some cases, managing exposure to interest rates using interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. There were no transfers of finance receivables that qualified for sale accounting treatment as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , and as a result, the transferred finance receivables are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related interest earned is included in Finance revenues .
We transfer eligible finance receivables into retail note owner trusts or wholesale note owner trusts in order to issue asset-backed securities. These trusts are VIEs of which we are determined to be the primary beneficiary and, therefore, the assets and liabilities of the trusts are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets . The outstanding balance of finance receivables transferred into these VIEs was $974 million and $948 million as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively. Other finance receivables related to secured transactions that do not qualify for sale accounting treatment were $107 million and $4 million as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively. For more information on assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and other securitizations accounted for as secured borrowings by our Financial Services segment, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
Finance Revenues
The following table presents the components of our Finance revenues :
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Retail notes and finance leases revenue
$
16

$
19

$
49

$
60

Wholesale notes interest
22

21

59

60

Operating lease revenue
15

13

44

37

Retail and wholesale accounts interest
7

8

20

21

Gross finance revenues
60

61

172

178

Less: Intercompany revenues
(22
)
(20
)
(57
)
(59
)
Finance revenues
$
38

$
41

$
115

$
119

5. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Our two portfolio segments, retail and wholesale, each consist of one class of receivable based on: (i) initial measurement attributes of the receivables, and (ii) the assessment and monitoring of risk and performance of the receivables. For more information, see Note 4, Finance Receivables .

17
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

The following tables present the activity related to our allowance for doubtful accounts for our retail portfolio segment, wholesale portfolio segment, and trade and other receivables:
Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
Three Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Trade and
Other
Receivables
Total
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Trade and
Other
Receivables
Total
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at beginning of period
$
22

$
2

$
38

$
62

$
22

$
2

$
34

$
58

Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries
3

—

—

3

2

—

3

5

Charge-off of accounts (A)
(2
)
—

(3
)
(5
)
(1
)
—

—

(1
)
Other (B)
1

—

(1
)
—

(1
)
—

(2
)
(3
)
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at end of period
$
24

$
2

$
34

$
60

$
22

$
2

$
35

$
59

Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Trade and
Other
Receivables
Total
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Trade and
Other
Receivables
Total
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at beginning of period
$
21

$
2

$
37

$
60

$
27

$
—

$
24

$
51

Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries
10

—

3

13

1

2

13

16

Charge-off of accounts (A)
(7
)
—

(5
)
(12
)
(7
)
—

—

(7
)
Other (B)
—

—

(1
)
(1
)
1

—

(2
)
(1
)
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at end of period
$
24

$
2

$
34

$
60

$
22

$
2

$
35

$
59

_________________________
(A)
We repossess sold and leased vehicles on defaulted finance receivables and leases, and place them into Inventories. Losses recognized at the time of repossession and charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts were less than $1 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 as well as for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 .
(B)
Amounts include currency translation.
The accrual of interest income is discontinued on certain impaired finance receivables. Impaired finance receivables include accounts with specific loss reserves and certain accounts that are on non-accrual status. In certain cases, we continue to collect payments on our impaired finance receivables.
The following table presents information regarding impaired finance receivables:
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
(in millions)
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Total
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Total
Impaired finance receivables with specific loss reserves
$
18

$
—

$
18

$
15

$
—

$
15

Impaired finance receivables without specific loss reserves
2

—

2

1

—

1

Specific loss reserves on impaired finance receivables
7

—

7

6

—

6

Finance receivables on non-accrual status
19

—

19

10

—

10

For the impaired finance receivables in the retail portfolio as of July 31, 2014 and 2013 , the average balances of those receivables were $15 million and $12 million during the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
The Company uses the aging of its receivables as well as other inputs when assessing credit quality. The following table presents the aging analysis for finance receivables:
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
(in millions)
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Total
Retail
Portfolio
Wholesale
Portfolio
Total
Current, and up to 30 days past due
$
649

$
1,290

$
1,939

$
699

$
1,204

$
1,903

30-90 days past due
72

2

74

44

2

46

Over 90 days past due
18

4

22

8

1

9

Total finance receivables
$
739

$
1,296

$
2,035

$
751

$
1,207

$
1,958


18
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

6. Inventories
The following table presents the components of Inventories :
(in millions)
July 31,
2014
October 31,
2013
Finished products
$
900

$
692

Work in process
80

58

Raw materials
482

460

Total inventories
$
1,462

$
1,210


7. Debt
(in millions)
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
Manufacturing operations
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2017, net of unamortized discount of $4 for both periods
$
693

$
693

8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, net of unamortized discount of $21 and $22, respectively
1,179

1,178

3.00% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2014, net of unamortized discount of $2 and $26, respectively
165

544

4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018, net of unamortized discount of $20 and $23, respectively
180

177

4.75% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2019, net of unamortized discount of $41
370

—

Debt of majority-owned dealerships
34

48

Financing arrangements and capital lease obligations
52

77

Loan Agreement related to 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040
225

225

Promissory Note
13

20

Financed lease obligations
195

218

Other
35

39

Total Manufacturing operations debt
3,141

3,219

Less: Current portion
254

658

Net long-term Manufacturing operations debt
$
2,887

$
2,561

(in millions)
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
Financial Services operations
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at fixed and variable rates, due serially through 2019
$
850

$
778

Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2014 through 2020
1,091

1,018

Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2015
75

21

Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2018
47

49

Total Financial Services operations debt
2,063

1,866

Less: Current portion
766

505

Net long-term Financial Services operations debt
$
1,297

$
1,361

Manufacturing Operations
4.75% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes
During the second quarter of 2014, we completed the private sale of $411 million of 4.75% senior subordinated convertible notes due April 2019 ("2019 Convertible Notes"), including a portion of the underwriter's over-allotment option. The Company received proceeds of $402 million , net of $9 million of issuance costs. Interest is payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year until the maturity date. The 2019 Convertible Notes are senior subordinated unsecured obligations of the Company.

19
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

In accounting for the issuance, the 2019 Convertible Notes were separated into a debt component and an equity component, resulting in the debt component being recorded at estimated fair value without consideration given to the conversion feature. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over the carrying amount is treated as debt discount and will be amortized to Interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the 2019 Convertible Notes. We estimated the fair value of the liability component at $367 million . The equity component of $44 million , is recorded in Additional paid in capital and will not be remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification. Issuance costs are also allocated between the debt and equity components resulting in $8 million of debt issue costs being recorded in Other noncurrent assets and $1 million recorded as a reduction in Additional paid in capital. The liability component of the debt issuance costs will be amortized to Interest expense over the term of the 2019 Convertible Notes.
The Company has the option to redeem the 2019 Convertible Notes for cash, in whole or in part, on any business day on or after April 20, 2017 if the last reported sale price of the Company's common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price then in effect for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive), during any 30 consecutive trading day period ending within 10 trading days immediately prior to the date of the redemption notice ("Optional Redemption"). The redemption price is equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Holders may convert the 2019 Convertible Notes into common stock of the Company at any time on or after October 15, 2018. Holders may also convert the 2019 Convertible Notes at their option prior to October 15, 2018, under the following circumstances: (i) during any fiscal quarter (and only during that fiscal quarter) commencing after April 30, 2014, if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price on each such trading day; (ii) during the 5 business day period after any 5 consecutive trading day period (the "Measurement Period") in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Convertible Notes for each trading day of that Measurement Period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the common stock and the applicable conversion rate on each such trading day; (iii) if the Company exercises its Optional Redemption, as described above, after October 15, 2018, holders of the 2019 Convertible Notes will have the right to convert their 2019 Convertible Notes at any time prior to the close of business on the business day preceding the redemption date, or; (iv) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events, as more fully described in the 2019 Convertible Notes indenture. The conversion rate will initially be 18.4946 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Convertible Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $54.07 per share of common stock). The conversion rate may be adjusted for anti-dilution provisions and the conversion price may be decreased by the Board of Directors to the extent permitted by law and listing requirements.
The 2019 Convertible Notes can be settled in common stock, cash, or a combination of common stock and cash. Upon conversion, the Company will satisfy its conversion obligations by delivering, at its election, shares of common stock (plus cash in lieu of fractional shares), cash ("Cash Settlement"), or any combination of cash and shares of common stock ("Combination Settlement"). If the Company elects a Cash Settlement or a Combination Settlement, the amounts due will be based on a daily conversion value calculated on a proportionate basis for each trading day in a 20 trading-day observation period. If a holder converts its 2019 Convertible Notes on or after October 15, 2018, and the Company elects physical settlement, the holder will not receive the shares of common stock into which the 2019 Convertible Notes are convertible until after the expiration of the observation period, even though the number of shares the holder will receive upon settlement will not change. It is our policy to settle the principal and accrued interest on the 2019 Convertible Notes with cash. Subject to certain exceptions, holders may require the Company to repurchase, for cash, all or part of the 2019 Convertible Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2019 Convertible Notes being repurchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
3.00% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes
In October 2009, we completed the sale of $570 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior subordinated convertible notes ("2014 Convertible Notes"), including over-allotment options. The 2014 Convertible Notes are senior subordinated unsecured obligations of the Company.
In connection with the sale of the 2014 Convertible Notes, the Company purchased call options for $125 million . The call options cover 11,337,870 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments, at an exercise price of $50.27 . The call options are intended to minimize share dilution associated with the 2014 Convertible Notes. In addition, in connection with the sale of the 2014 Convertible Notes, the Company also entered into separate warrant transactions whereby, the Company sold warrants for $87 million to sell in the aggregate 11,337,870 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments, at an exercise price of $60.14 per share of common stock.

20
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company used proceeds from the issuance of the 2019 Convertible Notes, as well as cash on-hand, to repurchase $404 million of notional amount of the 2014 Convertible Notes. The Company recorded a charge of $11 million related to the repurchase which was recognized in Other expense (income), net. In conjunction with the repurchases of the 2014 Convertible Notes, call options representing 8,026,456 shares expired or were unwound by the Company and warrants representing 6,523,319 shares were unwound by the Company.
Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility
In August 2012, Navistar, Inc. entered into an amended and restated asset-based credit agreement in an aggregate principal amount of $175 million (the "Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility"). The borrowing base of the facility was secured by a first priority security interest in Navistar, Inc.'s aftermarket parts inventory that is stored at certain parts distribution centers, storage facilities and third-party processor or logistics provider locations. In April 2013, the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was amended to include used truck inventory in the borrowing base.
Also in April 2013, the maturity date of the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility automatically extended to May 18, 2017, as a result of a modification to the maturity date of our Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2017 ("Term Loan Credit Facility"). The Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility contains customary provisions for financings of this type, including, without limitation, representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. All borrowings under the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility accrue interest at a rate equal to a base rate or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread. The spread, which will be based on an availability-based measure, ranges from 175 basis points to 225 basis points for Base Rate borrowings and 275 basis points to 325 basis points for LIBOR borrowings. The initial LIBOR spread is 275 basis points.
On July 3, 2014, the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was further amended to remove used truck inventory from the borrowing base. Additionally, the calculation of availability was revised to include cash collateral posted to support outstanding designated letters of credit, subject to a $40 million cap, and the cash management provisions were amended to reflect intercreditor arrangements with respect to a financing with Navistar Financial Corporation secured by a first priority lien on the used truck inventory. In connection with the removal of used truck inventory from the borrowing base, certain adjustments were made to the covenants to reflect that such assets were no longer included in the borrowing base. The amendment also provides for a 1.00% reduction in the amount of the participation fee with respect to designated letters of credit in the event that all outstanding letters of credit are in excess of $50 million , such reduction applying only to the portion of designated letters of credit in excess of $50 million for all outstanding letters of credit. The amendment had no impact on the aggregate commitment level under the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility Agreement, which remains at $175 million .
As of July 31, 2014 we had no borrowings under the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility.
Financial Services Operations

In July 2014, NFC paid a $30 million cash dividend to Navistar, Inc. Dividends and certain affiliate loans are subject to the restricted payment covenants set forth in NFC's bank credit facility.

In May 2014, Truck Retail Accounts Corporation ("TRAC"), our consolidated SPE, entered into a one-year revolving facility to fund up to $100 million . Borrowings under this facility are secured by eligible retail accounts receivable.

In March 2014, the maturity date of the $500 million variable funding notes was extended from September 2014 to March 2015.
In November 2013, Navistar Financial, S.A. de C.V., SOFOM, E.N.R, our Mexican financial services affiliate ("NFM"), expanded its facility of five-year notes secured by retail finance receivables by selling an additional P $800 million (the equivalent of approximately US $61 million at July 31, 2014 ).
In December 2013, International Truck Leasing Corporation, a special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiary of NFC, issued borrowings of $21 million , secured by operating and finance leases.
8. Postretirement Benefits
Defined Benefit Plans
We provide postretirement benefits to a substantial portion of our employees and retirees. Costs associated with postretirement

21
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

benefits include pension and postretirement health care expenses for employees, retirees, surviving spouses and dependents. Generally, the pension plans are non-contributory. Our policy is to fund the pension plans in accordance with applicable U.S. and Canadian government regulations and to make additional contributions from time to time. For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , we contributed $33 million and $98 million , respectively, and for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 we contributed $29 million and $86 million , respectively, to our pension plans to meet regulatory funding requirements. In August 2014, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014, including extension of pension funding interest rate relief, was signed into law. As a result, we lowered our funding expectations. We currently anticipate additional contributions of $66 million to our pension plans during the remainder of 2014.
We primarily fund other post-employment benefit ("OPEB") obligations, such as retiree medical, in accordance with a 1993 Settlement Agreement (the "1993 Settlement Agreement"), which requires us to fund a portion of the plans' annual service cost to a retiree benefit trust (the "Base Trust"). The 1993 Settlement Agreement resolved a class action lawsuit originally filed in 1992 regarding the restructuring of the Company's then applicable retiree health care and life insurance benefits. Contributions for the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, as well as anticipated contributions for the remainder of 2014 , are not material.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense (Income)
Net postretirement benefits expense included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is comprised of the following:
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
Pension Benefits
Health and Life
Insurance Benefits
Pension Benefits
Health and Life
Insurance Benefits
(in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
Service cost for benefits earned during the period
$
3

$
5

$
2

$
1

$
9

$
15

$
4

$
5

Interest on obligation
39

36

17

16

118

108

51

47

Amortization of cumulative loss
23

31

4

7

70

95

12

22

Amortization of prior service benefit
—

1

(1
)
(1
)
—

1

(3
)
(3
)
Contractual termination benefits
14

—

—

—

14

—

—

—

Premiums on pension insurance
—

—

—

—

—

1

—

—

Expected return on assets
(48
)
(48
)
(8
)
(8
)
(144
)
(142
)
(24
)
(25
)
Net postretirement benefits expense
$
31

$
25

$
14

$
15

$
67

$
78

$
40

$
46


Based on a ruling received from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada, in the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized contractual termination charges of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of its Chatham, Ontario plant. The Company has appealed this ruling. These charges were in addition to the previous curtailment and contractual termination charges recognized in the third quarter of 2011. There was also a remeasurement of the pension plan for hourly employees during the third quarter of 2014. The discount rate used to measure the pension benefit obligation was 3.8% at remeasurement, compared to 4.1% at October 31, 2013. As a result of the plan remeasurement, net actuarial gains of $10 million were recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the third quarter of 2014. The effects of the remeasurement will decrease net periodic postretirement cost by approximately $1 million for the remainder of 2014. See Note 3, Restructurings and Impairments for further discussion.
Defined Contribution Plans and Other Contractual Arrangements
Our defined contribution plans cover a substantial portion of domestic salaried employees and certain domestic represented employees. The defined contribution plans contain a 401(k) feature and provide most participants with a matching contribution from the Company. Effective February 1, 2013, the Company changed the timing for depositing the matching contributions to the end of the calendar year. Many participants covered by the plans receive annual Company contributions to their retirement accounts based on an age-weighted percentage of the participant's eligible compensation for the calendar year. Defined contribution expense pursuant to these plans was $6 million and $21 million in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , respectively, and $8 million and $23 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , respectively.
In accordance with the 1993 Settlement Agreement, an independent Retiree Supplemental Benefit Trust (the "Supplemental Trust") was established. The Supplemental Trust, and the benefits it provides to certain retirees pursuant to a certain Retiree Supplemental Benefit Program under the 1993 Settlement Agreement ("Supplemental Benefit Program"), is not part of the Company's consolidated financial statements. The assets of the Supplemental Trust arise from three sources: (i) the Company's 1993 contribution to the Supplemental Trust of 25.5 million shares of our Class B common stock, which were subsequently sold by the Supplemental Trust prior to 2000, (ii) contingent profit-sharing contributions made by the Company pursuant to a

22
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

certain Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan ("Supplemental Benefit Profit Sharing Plan"), and (iii) net investment gains on the Supplemental Trust's assets, if any.
The Company's contingent profit sharing obligations under the Supplemental Benefits Profit Sharing Plan will continue until certain funding targets defined by the 1993 Settlement Agreement are met ("Profit Sharing Cessation"). Upon Profit Sharing Cessation, the Company would assume responsibility for (i) establishing the investment policy for the Supplemental Trust, (ii) approving or disapproving of certain additional supplemental benefits to the extent such benefits would result in higher expenditures than those contemplated upon the Profit Sharing Cessation, and (iii) making additional contributions to the Supplemental Trust as necessary to make up for investment and/or actuarial losses. We have recorded no profit sharing accruals based on the operating performance of the entities that are included in the determination of qualifying profits. For more information, see Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies , for a discussion of pending litigation regarding the Supplemental Benefit Profit Sharing Plan.
9. Income Taxes
We compute on a quarterly basis an estimated annual effective tax rate considering ordinary income and related income tax expense. For all periods presented, U.S. and certain foreign results are excluded from ordinary income due to ordinary losses for which no benefit can be recognized. Ordinary income refers to income (loss) before income tax expense excluding significant unusual or infrequently occurring items. The tax effect of a significant unusual or infrequently occurring item is recorded in the interim period in which it occurs. Items included in income tax expense in the periods in which they occur include the tax effects of material restructurings, impairments, cumulative effect of changes in tax laws or rates, foreign exchange gains and losses, adjustments to uncertain tax positions, and adjustments to our valuation allowance due to changes in judgment regarding the ability to realize deferred tax assets in future years. In the second quarter of 2014, in accordance with the intraperiod tax allocation rules, the Company recorded a net benefit of $13 million in Income tax expense related to continuing operations, and an offsetting reduction in Additional paid in capital , which resulted from the issuance and repurchase of convertible notes. For more information, see Note 7, Debt.
We have evaluated the need to maintain a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets based on our assessment of whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax benefits will be realized through the generation of future taxable income. Appropriate consideration is given to all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. We continue to maintain a valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets, as well as certain foreign deferred tax assets, that we believe, on a more-likely-than-not basis, will not be realized. During the second quarter of 2014, our evaluation of the realizability of our Brazilian deferred tax assets resulted in a determination that a valuation allowance was required, due to a deterioration of operating performance in Brazil and an increase in net operating loss carryforwards. As a result, we recorded an income tax expense of $29 million , reflecting the establishment of the valuation allowance, and the tax impact of the impairment of certain intangible assets. For all remaining deferred tax assets, while we believe that it is more likely than not that they will be realized, we believe that it is reasonably possible that additional deferred tax asset valuation allowances could be required in the next 12 months.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of July 31, 2014 , the amount of liability for uncertain tax positions was $50 million . If the unrecognized tax benefits are recognized, all such benefits would impact our effective tax rate. However, to the extent we continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets, the effect may be in the form of an increase in the deferred tax asset related to our net operating loss carry forward, which would be offset by a full valuation allowance.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of Income tax expense . For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , total interest and penalties related to our uncertain tax positions resulted in an income tax expense of $0 million and income tax benefit of $2 million , respectively.
We have open tax years back to 2001 with various significant taxing jurisdictions including the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. In connection with the examination of tax returns, contingencies may arise that generally result from differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to the amount, timing, or inclusion of revenues or expenses in taxable income, or the sustainability of tax credits to reduce income taxes payable. We believe we have sufficient accruals for our contingent tax liabilities. Annual tax provisions include amounts considered sufficient to pay assessments that may result from examinations of prior year tax returns, although actual results may differ. While it is probable that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease during the next 12 months, we do not expect any such change would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

23
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

In the three months ended January 31, 2014, we reached a tax settlement with the State of Alabama, which resulted in the recording of a decrease to our uncertain tax positions of $8 million . In the first quarter of 2013, we accrued $12 million related to this matter, but later reduced our accrual by $4 million in the fourth quarter of 2013 in anticipation of the settlement.
10. Fair Value Measurements
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis, a three-level hierarchy of measurements based upon observable and unobservable inputs is used to arrive at fair value. Observable inputs are developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our assumptions about valuation based on the best information available in the circumstances. Depending on the inputs, we classify each fair value measurement as follows:
•
Level 1—based upon quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets,
•
Level 2—based upon quoted prices for similar instruments, prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or model-derived valuations, all of whose significant inputs are observable, and
•
Level 3—based upon one or more significant unobservable inputs.
The following section describes key inputs and assumptions in our valuation methodologies:
Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash Equivalents —We classify highly liquid investments, with an original maturity of 90 days or less, including U.S. Treasury bills, federal agency securities, and commercial paper, as cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these instruments.
Marketable Securities —Our marketable securities portfolios are classified as available-for-sale and primarily include investments in U.S. government securities and commercial paper with an original maturity greater than 90 days. We use quoted prices from active markets to determine fair value.
Derivative Assets and Liabilities —We measure the fair value of derivatives assuming that the unit of account is an individual derivative transaction and that each derivative could be sold or transferred on a stand-alone basis. We classify within Level 2 our derivatives that are traded over-the-counter and valued using internal models based on observable market inputs. In certain cases, market data is not available and we estimate inputs such as in situations where trading in a particular commodity is not active. Measurements based upon these unobservable inputs are classified within Level 3. For more information regarding derivatives, see Note 11, Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts .
Guarantees —We provide certain guarantees of payments and residual values to specific counterparties. Fair value of these guarantees is based upon internally developed models that utilize current market-based assumptions and historical data. We classify these liabilities within Level 3. For more information regarding guarantees, see Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies.
The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
(in millions)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets
Marketable securities:
U.S. Treasury bills
$
260

$
—

$
—

$
260

$
396

$
—

$
—

$
396

Other
358

—

—

358

434

—

—

434

Derivative financial instruments:
Foreign currency contracts
—

—

—

—

—

4

—

4

Interest rate caps
—

1

—

1

—

1

—

1

Total assets
$
618

$
1

$
—

$
619

$
830

$
5

$
—

$
835

Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments:
Foreign currency contracts
$
—

$
1

$
—

$
1

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

Guarantees
—

—

6

6

—

—

6

6

Total liabilities
$
—

$
1

$
6

$
7

$
—

$
—

$
6

$
6


24
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

The following table presents the changes for those financial instruments classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:
Three Months Ended July 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
Guarantees
Commodity contracts
Guarantees
Commodity contracts
Balance at May 1
$
(6
)
$
—

$
(7
)
$
—

Transfers out of Level 3
—

—

—

—

Issuances
—

—

—

—

Settlements
—

—

—

—

Balance at July 31
$
(6
)
$
—

$
(7
)
$
—

Change in unrealized gains on assets and liabilities still held
$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

Nine Months Ended July 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
Guarantees
Commodity contracts
Guarantees
Commodity contracts
Balance at November 1
$
(6
)
$
—

$
(7
)
$
—

Transfers out of Level 3
—

—

—

—

Issuances
—

—

—

—

Settlements
—

—

—

—

Balance at July 31
$
(6
)
$
—

$
(7
)
$
—

Change in unrealized gains on assets and liabilities still held
$
—

$
—

$
—

$
—

The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
(in millions)
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
Level 2 financial instruments
Carrying value of impaired finance receivables (A)
$
18

$
15

Specific loss reserve
(7
)
(6
)
Fair value
$
11

$
9

_________________________
(A)
Certain impaired finance receivables are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. An impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the receivables exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of remarketing costs. Fair values of the underlying collateral are determined by reference to dealer vehicle value publications adjusted for certain market factors.

In the second quarter of 2014, for the purpose of impairment evaluation the Company measured the implied fair value of the Company's Brazilian engine reporting unit's goodwill and the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset, trademark. The Company's Brazilian engine reporting unit's goodwill was determined to be fully impaired and resulted in a non-cash charge of $142 million . In addition, the related trademark, with a carrying value of $43 million was determined to be impaired and a non-cash charge of $7 million was recognized. The impairment charges were included in Asset impairment charges in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations . We utilized the income approach to determine the fair value of these Level 3 assets. For more information, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies .

In the first quarter of 2014, the Company concluded it had a triggering event related to potential sales of assets requiring assessment of impairment for certain intangible and long-lived assets in the North America Truck segment. As a result, certain amortizing intangible assets and long-lived assets with a carrying value of $18 million were determined to be fully impaired, resulting in an impairment charge of $18 million , which was included in Asset impairment charges in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations . We utilized the market approach to determine the fair values of these Level 2 assets.
During the third quarter of 2013, certain impaired property and equipment and intangible assets with a carrying amount of $21 million were written down to their fair value of $4 million resulting in an impairment charge of $17 million , which was included in Asset impairment charges . We utilized the market and cost approach to determine the fair value of these Level 3 assets.
In addition to the methods and assumptions we use for the financial instruments recorded at fair value as discussed above, we use the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value for our other financial instruments that are not marked to market on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts of Cash and cash equivalents , Restricted cash , and Accounts payable

25
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

approximate fair values because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these instruments. Finance receivables generally consist of retail and wholesale accounts and retail and wholesale notes. The carrying amounts of Trade and other receivables and retail and wholesale accounts approximate fair values as a result of the short-term nature of the receivables. The carrying amounts of wholesale notes approximate fair values as a result of the short-term nature of the wholesale notes and their variable interest rate terms. The fair values of these financial instruments are classified as Level 1. Due to the nature of the aforementioned financial instruments, they have been excluded from the fair value amounts presented in the table below.
The fair values of our retail notes are estimated by discounting expected cash flows at estimated current market rates. The fair values of our retail notes are classified as Level 3 financial instruments.
The fair values of our debt instruments classified as Level 1 were determined using quoted market prices. The 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds are traded, but the trading market is illiquid, and as a result, the Loan Agreement underlying the Tax Exempt Bonds is classified as Level 2. The fair values of our Level 3 debt instruments are generally determined using internally developed valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow modeling. Inputs such as discount rates and credit spreads reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument and may be unobservable.
The following tables present the carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments:
As of July 31, 2014
Estimated Fair Value
Carrying Value
(in millions)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets
Retail notes
$
—

$
—

$
299

$
299

$
296

Notes receivable
—

—

8

8

9

Liabilities
Debt:
Manufacturing operations
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2017
—

—

699

699

693

8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021
1,246

—

—

1,246

1,179

3.00% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2014 (A)
168

—

—

168

165

4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018 (A)
—

—

206

206

180

4.75% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2019 (A)
—

—

436

436

370

Debt of majority-owned dealerships
—

—

34

34

34

Financing arrangements
—

—

23

23

49

Loan Agreement related to 6.50% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040
—

236

—

236

225

Promissory Note
—

—

13

13

13

Financed lease obligations
—

—

195

195

195

Other
—

—

33

33

35

Financial Services operations
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at various rates, due serially through 2019
—

—

848

848

850

Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2014 through 2020
—

—

1,063

1,063

1,091

Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2015
75

—

—

75

75

Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2018
—

—

47

47

47



26
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

As of October 31, 2013
Estimated Fair Value
Carrying Value
(in millions)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets
Retail notes
$
—

$
—

$
390

$
390

$
390

Notes receivable
—

—

13

13

14

Liabilities
Debt:
Manufacturing operations
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2017
—

—

720

720

693

8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021
1,274

—

—

1,274

1,178

3.00% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2014 (A)
586

—

—

586

544

4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018 (A)
—

—

203

203

177

Debt of majority-owned dealerships
—

—

48

48

48

Financing arrangements
—

—

44

44

73

Loan Agreement related to 6.50% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040
—

229

—

229

225

Promissory Note
—

—

20

20

20

Financed lease obligations
—

—

218

218

218

Other
—

—

36

36

39

Financial Services operations
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at various rates, due serially through 2019
—

—

775

775

778

Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2014 through 2019
—

—

990

990

1,018

Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2015
21

—

—

21

21

Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2017
—

—

49

49

49

_________________________
(A)
The carrying value represents the consolidated financial statement amount of the debt which excludes the allocation of the conversion feature to equity, while the fair value is based on quoted market prices for Level 1 convertible notes which include the equity feature and internally developed valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow modeling for Level 3 convertible notes which include the equity feature.
11. Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts
Derivative Financial Instruments
We use derivative financial instruments as part of our overall interest rate, foreign currency, and commodity risk management strategies to reduce our interest rate exposure, reduce exchange rate risk for transactional exposures denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, and minimize the effect of commodity price volatility. From time to time, we use foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage the risk of exchange rate movements that would affect the value of our foreign currency cash flows. Foreign currency exchange rate movements create a degree of risk by affecting the value of sales made and costs incurred in currencies other than the functional currency. From time to time, we also use commodity forward contracts to manage our exposure to variability in certain commodity prices. In 2009, in connection with the sale of our 2014 Convertible Notes, we purchased call options and we entered into separate warrant transactions. The call options are intended to minimize share dilution associated with the 2014 Convertible Notes. As the call options and warrants are indexed to our common stock, we recognized them in permanent equity in Additional paid-in capital in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets , and will not recognize subsequent changes in fair value as long as the instruments remain classified as equity.
We generally do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes and did not during the three months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 . None of our derivatives qualified for hedge accounting treatment during the three months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 .
The majority of our derivative contracts are transacted under International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") master agreements. Each agreement permits the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of default or certain other termination events. For derivative financial instruments, we have elected not to offset derivative positions in the balance sheet with the same counterparty under the same agreement. Certain of our derivative contracts contain provisions that require us to provide collateral if certain thresholds are exceeded. No collateral was provided at July 31, 2014 and at October 31, 2013 . Collateral is generally not required to be provided by our counter-parties for derivative contracts. We manage exposure to counter-party

27
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

credit risk by entering into derivative financial instruments with various major financial institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such instruments. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any of the counter-parties. Our exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counter-parties is limited to those assets that have been recorded, but have not yet been received in cash. At July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , our exposure to the credit risk of others was $1 million and $5 million , respectively.
Our Financial Services operations may use interest rate swaps or interest rate caps from time to time to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by limiting the amount of fixed rate finance receivables that are funded with variable rate debt. The Mexican Financial Services operation uses cross currency swaps to limit exposure to fluctuations in the value of the peso, as required under Mexican bank credit facilities.
The fair values of all derivatives are recorded as assets or liabilities on a gross basis in our Consolidated Balance Sheets . The following table presents the fair values of our derivatives and their respective balance sheet locations:
July 31, 2014
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
(in millions)
Location in
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Fair Value
Location in
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Fair Value
Foreign currency contracts
Other current assets
$
—

Other current liabilities
$
1

Interest rate caps
Other current assets
1

Other noncurrent liabilities
—

Total fair value
$
1

$
1

October 31, 2013
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
(in millions)
Location in
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Fair Value
Location in
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Fair Value
Foreign currency contracts
Other current assets
$
4

Other current liabilities
$
—

Interest rate caps
Other noncurrent assets
1

Other current liabilities
—

Total fair value
$
5

$
—

The following table presents the location and amount of loss (gain) recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations related to derivatives:
Location in Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Foreign currency contracts
Other expense (income), net
$
1

$
(4
)
$
2

$
(6
)
Interest rate caps
Interest expense
1

—

2

—

Cross currency swaps
Other expense (income), net
1

(1
)
1

(1
)
Commodity forward contracts
Costs of products sold
(1
)
(1
)
(1
)
1

Total loss (gain)
$
2

$
(6
)
$
4

$
(6
)
Foreign Currency Contracts
During 2014 and 2013 , we entered into foreign exchange forward and option contracts as economic hedges of anticipated cash flows denominated in Canadian Dollars, Brazilian Reais and Euros. All contracts were entered into to protect against the risk that the eventual cash flows resulting from certain transactions would be affected by changes in exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and the respective foreign currency.

28
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

The following table presents the outstanding foreign currency contracts as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 :
(in millions)
Currency
Notional Amount
Maturity
As of July 31, 2014
Forward exchange contract
EUR
€
3

August 2014
Forward exchange contract
EUR
€
4

September 2014
Forward exchange contract
EUR
€
5

October 2014
Forward exchange contract
BRL
US$
20

October 2014
As of October 31, 2013
Option collar contracts
EUR
€
2

October 2013
Forward exchange contract
CAD
C$
90

October 2013
Option collar contract
CAD
C$
50

October 2013
Option collar contract
BRL
US$
25

October 2013
Commodity Forward Contracts
During 2014 and 2013 , we entered into commodity forward contracts as economic hedges of our exposure to variability in commodity prices for diesel fuel and steel. As of July 31, 2014 , we had outstanding diesel fuel contracts with aggregate notional values of $8 million and outstanding steel contracts with aggregate notional values of $13 million . The commodity forward contracts have maturity dates ranging from July 31, 2014 to October 31, 2015. As of October 31, 2013 , we had outstanding diesel fuel contracts with aggregate notional values of $2 million and outstanding steel contracts with aggregate notional values of $11 million . All of these contracts were entered into to protect against the risk that the eventual cash flows related to purchases of the commodities will be affected by changes in prices.
Interest-Rate Contracts
From time to time, we enter into various interest-rate contracts, interest rate caps, and cross currency swaps. As of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , the notional amount of our outstanding cross currency swaps was $40 million and $45 million , respectively. We are exposed to interest rate and exchange rate risk as a result of our borrowing activities. The objective of these contracts is to mitigate fluctuations in earnings, cash flows, and fair value of borrowings. Our Mexican financial services operation uses interest rate caps and cross currency swaps to protect against the potential of rising interest rates as required by the terms of its variable-rate asset-backed securities. As of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , the notional amount of our outstanding interest rate caps was $138 million and $78 million , respectively.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Guarantees
We occasionally provide guarantees that could obligate us to make future payments if the primary entity fails to perform under its contractual obligations. We have recognized liabilities for some of these guarantees in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as they meet the recognition and measurement provisions of U.S. GAAP. In addition to the liabilities that have been recognized, we are contingently liable for other potential losses under various guarantees. We do not believe that claims that may be made under such guarantees would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
In March 2010, we entered into an operating agreement, as amended, which contains automatic extensions and is subject to early termination provisions, with GE Capital Corporation and GE Capital Commercial, Inc. (collectively, "GE") (the "GE Operating Agreement"). Under the terms of the GE Operating Agreement, as amended, GE is our preferred source of retail customer financing for equipment offered by us and our dealers in the U.S. We provide GE with a loss sharing arrangement for certain credit losses. Under the loss sharing arrangement, as amended, we generally reimburse GE for credit losses in excess of the first 10% of the financed value of a contract; for certain leases we reimburse GE up to a maximum of the first 9.5% of the credit loss on those lease contracts. The Company’s exposure to loss is mitigated because contracts under the GE Operating Agreement are secured by the financed equipment. There were $1.4 billion of outstanding loan principal and operating lease payments receivable at both July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , financed through the GE Operating Agreement and subject to the loss sharing arrangement. The related financed values of these outstanding contracts were $2.2 billion and $2.0 billion at July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , respectively. Generally, we do not carry the contracts under the GE Operating Agreement on our Consolidated Balance Sheets . However, for certain GE financed contracts which we have accounted for as borrowings,

29
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

we have recognized equipment leased to others of $164 million and financed lease obligations of $195 million in our Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period ended July 31, 2014 .
Historically, our losses, representing the entire loss amount, on similar contracts, measured as a percentage of the average balance of the related contracts, ranged from 0.3% to 2.1% . Under limited circumstances NFC retains the right to originate retail customer financings. Based on our historic experience of losses on similar contracts and the nature of the loss sharing arrangement, we do not believe our share of losses related to balances currently outstanding will be material.
For certain independent dealers’ wholesale inventory financed by third-party banks or finance companies, we provide limited repurchase agreements to the respective financing institution. The amount of losses related to these arrangements has not been material to our Consolidated Statements of Operations or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the value of the guarantees and accruals recorded are not material to our Consolidated Balance Sheets .
We also have issued limited residual value guarantees in connection with various leases. The amounts of the guarantees are estimated and recorded. Our guarantees are contingent upon the fair value of the leased assets at the end of the lease term. The amount of losses related to these arrangements has not been material to our Consolidated Statements of Operations or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the value of the guarantees and accruals recorded are not material to our Consolidated Balance Sheets .
We obtain certain stand-by letters of credit and surety bonds from third-party financial institutions in the ordinary course of business when required under contracts or to satisfy insurance-related requirements. As of July 31, 2014 , the amount of stand-by letters of credit and surety bonds was $108 million .
We extend credit commitments to certain truck fleet customers, which allow them to purchase parts and services from participating dealers. The participating dealers receive accelerated payments from us with the result that we carry the receivables and absorb the credit risk related to these customers. As of July 31, 2014 , the total credit limit under this program was $13 million of which $9 million was unused.
In addition, as of July 31, 2014 , we have entered into various purchase commitments of $168 million and contracts that have cancellation fees of $36 million with various expiration dates through 2019.
In the ordinary course of business, we also provide routine indemnifications and other guarantees, the terms of which range in duration and often are not explicitly defined. We do not believe these will result in claims that would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Environmental Liabilities
We have been named a potentially responsible party ("PRP"), in conjunction with other parties, in a number of cases arising under an environmental protection law, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, popularly known as the "Superfund" law. These cases involve sites that allegedly received wastes from current or former Company locations. Based on information available to us which, in most cases, consists of data related to quantities and characteristics of material generated at current or former Company locations, material allegedly shipped by us to these disposal sites, as well as cost estimates from PRPs and/or federal or state regulatory agencies for the cleanup of these sites, a reasonable estimate is calculated of our share of the probable costs, if any, and accruals are recorded in our consolidated financial statements. These accruals are generally recognized no later than upon completion of the remedial feasibility study and are not discounted to their present value. We review all accruals on a regular basis and believe that, based on these calculations, our share of the potential additional costs for the cleanup of each site will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Two sites formerly owned by us: (i) Solar Turbines in San Diego, California, and (ii) the Canton Plant in Canton, Illinois; were identified as having soil and groundwater contamination. Two sites in Sao Paulo, Brazil, where we are currently operating, were identified as having soil and groundwater contamination. While investigations and cleanup activities continue at these and other sites, we believe that we have adequate accruals to cover costs to complete the cleanup of all sites.
We have accrued $22 million for these and other environmental matters, which are included within Other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities , as of July 31, 2014 . The majority of these accrued liabilities are expected to be paid subsequent to 2015 .
Along with other vehicle manufacturers, we have been subject to an increased number of asbestos-related claims in recent years. In general, these claims relate to illnesses alleged to have resulted from asbestos exposure from component parts found in older vehicles, although some cases relate to the alleged presence of asbestos in our facilities. In these claims, we are generally not the sole defendant, and the claims name as defendants numerous manufacturers and suppliers of a wide variety of products

30
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

allegedly containing asbestos. We have strongly disputed these claims, and it has been our policy to defend against them vigorously. Historically, the actual damages paid out to claimants have not been material in any year to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. It is possible that the number of these claims will continue to grow, and that the costs for resolving asbestos related claims could become significant in the future.
Legal Proceedings
Overview
We are subject to various claims arising in the ordinary course of business, and are party to various legal proceedings that constitute ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our business. The majority of these claims and proceedings relate to commercial, product liability, and warranty matters. In addition, from time to time we are subject to various claims and legal proceedings related to employee compensation, benefits, and benefits administration including, but not limited to, compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and Department of Labor requirements. In our opinion, apart from the actions set forth below, the disposition of these proceedings and claims, after taking into account recorded accruals and the availability and limits of our insurance coverage, will not have a material adverse effect on our business or our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Profit Sharing Disputes
Pursuant to the 1993 Settlement Agreement, the program administrator and named fiduciary of the Supplemental Benefit Program is the Supplemental Benefit Program committee (the "Committee"), comprised of non-Company individuals. In August 2013, the Committee filed a motion for leave to amend its February 2013 complaint (which sought injunctive relief for the Company to provide certain information to which it was allegedly entitled under the Supplemental Benefit Profit Sharing Plan) and a proposed amended complaint (the "Profit Sharing Complaint") in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (the "Court"). Leave to file the Profit Sharing Complaint was granted by the Court in October 2013. In its Profit Sharing Complaint, the Committee alleges the Company breached the 1993 Settlement Agreement and violated ERISA by failing to properly calculate profit sharing contributions due under the Supplemental Benefit Profit Sharing Plan. The Committee seeks damages in excess of $50 million , injunctive relief and reimbursement of attorneys' fees and costs. In October 2013, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the Profit Sharing Complaint and to compel the Committee to comply with the dispute resolution procedures set forth in the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan. In March 2014, the Court denied the Company's Motion to Dismiss and ruled, among other things, that the Company waived its right to compel the Committee to comply with the dispute resolution provisions set forth in the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan. In April 2014, the Company appealed the Court's refusal to compel the Committee to comply with the dispute resolution process to the Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and the briefs for the appeal were completed in June 2014. The Company also filed a motion in Court to stay all proceedings pending the appeal. In May 2014, the Court granted the motion to stay all proceedings, including discovery, pending the appeal.
In addition, various local bargaining units of the UAW have filed separate grievances pursuant to the profit sharing plans under various collective bargaining agreements in effect between the Company and the UAW that may have similar legal and factual issues as the Profit Sharing Complaint.
FATMA Notice
International Indústria de Motores da América do Sul Ltda. ("IIAA"), formerly known as Maxion International Motores S/A ("Maxion"), now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, received a notice in July 2010 from the State of Santa Catarina Environmental Protection Agency ("FATMA") in Brazil. The notice alleged that Maxion had sent wastes to a facility owned and operated by a company known as Natureza and that soil and groundwater contamination had occurred at the Natureza facility. The notice asserted liability against Maxion and assessed an initial penalty in the amount of R$2 million (the equivalent of approximately US $1 million at July 31, 2014 ), which is not due and final until all administrative appeals are exhausted. Maxion was one of numerous companies that received similar notices. IIAA filed an administrative defense in August 2010 and has not yet received a decision following that filing. IIAA disputes the allegations in the notice and intends to vigorously defend itself.

31
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Sao Paulo Groundwater Notice
In March 2014, IIAA, along with other nearby companies, received from the Sao Paulo District Attorney a notice and proposed Consent Agreement relating to alleged neighborhood-wide groundwater contamination at or around its Sao Paulo manufacturing facility. The proposed Consent Agreement seeks certain groundwater investigations and other technical relief and proposes sanctions in the amount of R $3 million (the equivalent of approximately US $1.3 million at July 31, 2014 ). IIAA disputes the allegations in the notice and proposed Consent Agreement and intends to vigorously defend itself.
Lis Franco de Toledo, et. al. vs. Syntex do Brasil and IIAA
In 1973, Syntex do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda. ("Syntex"), a predecessor of IIAA, our Brazilian engine manufacturing subsidiary, which was formerly known as MWM International Industria de Motores da America do Sul Ltda ("MWM"), filed a lawsuit in Brazilian court against Dr. Lis Franco de Toledo and others (collectively, "Lis Franco"). Syntex claimed Lis Franco had improperly terminated a contract which provided for the transfer from Lis Franco to Syntex of a patent for the production of a certain vaccine. Lis Franco filed a counterclaim alleging that he was entitled to royalties under the contract. In 1975, the Brazilian court ruled in favor of Lis Franco, a decision which was affirmed on appeal in 1976. In 1984, while the case was still pending, Syntex’ owner, Syntex Comercio e Participacoes Ltds ("Syntex Parent") sold the stock of Syntex to MWM, and in connection with that sale Syntex Parent agreed to indemnify and hold harmless MWM for any and all liabilities of Syntex, including its prior pharmaceutical operations (which had been previously spun-off to another subsidiary wholly-owned by the Syntex Parent) and any payments that might be payable under the Lis Franco lawsuit. In the mid to late 1990s, Syntex Parent was merged with an entity known as Wyeth Industria Farmaceutica LTDA ("Wyeth").
In 1999, Lis Franco amended its pleadings to add MWM to the lawsuit as a defendant. In 2000, Wyeth acknowledged to the Brazilian court its sole responsibility for amounts due in the Lis Franco lawsuit and MWM asked the court to be dismissed from that action. The judge denied that request. MWM appealed and lost.
In his pleadings, Lis Franco alleged that the royalties payable to him were approximately R$42 million . MWM believed the appropriate amount payable was approximately R$16 million . In December 2009, the court appointed expert responsible for the preparation of the royalty calculation filed a report with the court indicating royalty damages of approximately R$70 million . MWM challenged the expert’s calculation. In August 2010, the court asked the parties to consider the appointment of a new expert. MWM agreed with this request but Lis Franco objected and, in September 2010, the court accepted and ratified the expert’s calculation as of May 2010 in the amount of R$74 million and entered judgment against MWM.
In September 2010, MWM filed a motion for clarification of the decision which would suspend its enforcement. The Brazilian court denied this motion and MWM appealed the matter to the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Appeals (the "Court of Appeals"). In January 2011, the Court of Appeals granted the appeal and issued an injunction suspending the lower court’s decision and judgment in favor of Lis Franco. In January 2011, MWM merged into IIAA and is now known as IIAA. An expert appointed by the Court of Appeals submitted his calculation report on October 24, 2011, and determined the amount to be R$10.85 million . The parties submitted comments to such report in December 2011, the expert replied to these comments and ratified his previous report in May 2012, and the parties again submitted comments to the expert's reply. The expert reviewed these comments and submitted a complementary report in December 2012 which determined the amount to be R$22 million . The parties submitted comments to the complementary report in January 2013. In May 2013, the Court of Appeals determined the damages amount to be R$25 million . Wyeth, Lis Franco and MWM filed motions for clarification against such decision and in July 2013 the Court of Appeals denied all of these motions. MWM, Wyeth and Lis Franco filed a special appeal to the Brasilia Special Court of Appeals on August 20, 2013. Prior to the Brasilia Special Court of Appeals ruling on such appeal, in April 2014, the parties entered into a settlement agreement which was ratified by the Special Court of Appeals in April 2014 (the “Rio Settlement”). Pursuant to the Rio Settlement, Wyeth undertook to pay R $20 million (the equivalent of approximately US $9 million at July 31, 2014 ) to Lis Franco within 30 days from the ratification of the Rio Settlement, and Lis Franco undertook to release IIAA and Wyeth from any indemnification obligations as well as from any and all claims against IIAA regarding the subject of Lis Franco’s counterclaim. In addition, Wyeth agreed to pay the total amount of R $8.5 million (the equivalent of approximately US $3.8 million at July 31, 2014 ) to Lis Franco’s attorneys within 30 days from the ratification of the Rio Settlement, and Lis Franco undertook to release IIAA and Wyeth from any and all claims regarding such attorneys’ fees. The Rio Settlement became final and binding on May 27, 2014 and the matter was closed on the same date.
In parallel, in May 2010, MWM filed a lawsuit in Sao Paulo, Brazil, against Wyeth seeking recognition that Wyeth is liable for any and all liabilities, costs, expenses, and payments related to the Lis Franco lawsuit. In September 2012, the Sao Paulo court ruled in favor of MWM and ordered Wyeth to pay, directly to the Estate of Lis Franco de Toledo and others and jointly with MWM, the amounts of the condemnation, to be determined at the end of the liquidation proceeding. The Sao Paulo court also ordered Wyeth to reimburse MWM for all expenses, including court costs and attorney fees associated with the case. The

32
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

parties were notified of the decision in October 2012, to which MWM and Wyeth filed motions for clarification of certain issues, and in December 2012, the Sao Paulo court rejected both motions. In January 2013, Wyeth filed an appeal to the Sao Paulo court's December 2012 decision, and in April 2013, MWM filed an answer to the appeal. The appeal was rejected by the Court of Appeals on September 10, 2013. Wyeth filed a motion for clarification to the Court of Appeals. The motion was rejected by the Court of Appeals on November 5, 2013. Wyeth filed a special appeal, addressed to the Superior Court of Appeals, in December 2013. MWM filed an answer to the appeal in January 2014. Before the Superior Court of Appeals ruled on the appeal, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, the “Sao Paulo Settlement,” subject to the approval of the Rio Settlement. Pursuant to the Sao Paulo Settlement, Wyeth undertook to (i) comply with the terms of the Rio Settlement, including payment of the agreed-upon amounts to Lis Franco and his attorneys; (ii) withdraw the appeal filed against the award granted to MWM in Sao Paulo; and (iii) pay R$0.2 million in attorneys’ fees to MWM's counsels. Once the Rio Settlement became final and binding, the Sao Paulo Settlement was submitted for ratification in April 2014. At the same time, Wyeth withdrew its appeal and both parties waived the right to appeal the future ratification of the Sao Paulo Settlement. In May 2014, the Sao Paulo State Court of Appeals ratified Wyeth’s appeal withdrawal in a final and binding decision and the matter was closed on the same date.
MaxxForce Engine EGR Warranty Litigation
On June 24, 2014, N&C Transportation Ltd. filed a putative class action lawsuit against Navistar International Corporation, Navistar, Inc., Navistar Canada Inc., and Harbour International Trucks in Canada in the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the “N&C Action”).   The N&C Action seeks to certify a class of persons in British Columbia who purchased heavy duty Class 8 trucks equipped with Navistar EGR engines. N&C alleges that vehicles with engines using EGR technology had pervasive quality issues and defects, and that the defendants knew of such engine problems but failed to disclose them to consumers and failed to cure the defects. N&C asserts claims based on theories of breach of contract, misrepresentation, unfair competition, and negligence. For relief, the N&C Action seeks monetary damages and an order rescinding purchase agreements for the trucks in question. The N&C Action also seeks special and punitive damages, interest, and costs. The Company has not yet been served in the N&C Action.
On July 7, 2014, Par 4 Transport, LLC filed a putative class action lawsuit against Navistar, Inc. in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “Par 4 Action”). The Par 4 Action seeks to certify a class of persons or entities in the United States who purchased or leased a ProStar vehicle between 2010 and 2013 equipped with a MaxxForce 13-liter diesel engine.  Par 4 alleges that the MaxxForce Advanced EGR engines are defective and that Navistar, Inc. failed to disclose and correct the defect. Par 4 asserts claims against Navistar, Inc. based on theories of breach of warranty, consumer fraud, and declaratory relief. For relief, the Par 4 Action seeks monetary damages, declaratory relief, interest, fees, and costs.
After the Par 4 Action was filed, two additional putative class action lawsuits were filed in July in the same District Court. The proposed classes in the two additional lawsuits are somewhat broader in time and engine scope than the class proposed in the Par 4 Action, but the two additional lawsuits are otherwise substantially similar to the Par 4 Action.  First, on July 9, 2014, Denis Gray Trucking, Inc., Carmichael Leasing Co., Inc. d/b/a Carmichael Nationalease, and GTL Enterprises Inc. filed a putative class action against Navistar International Corporation seeking to certify a nationwide class as described above, and also seeking to certify state-wide subclasses in Illinois, California, and Washington. Second, on July 30, 2014, B&T Express, Inc., OMCO Enterprises, LLC, ALJEN Enterprises, LLC, A.T.T. Trucking, LLC, H.J. O'Malley Trucking, LLC, and Traficanti Trucking, LLC filed a putative class action against Navistar International Corporation seeking to certify a nationwide class as described above, and also seeking to certify a state-wide subclass in Ohio.
All three of these MaxxForce Engine putative class action lawsuits have been assigned to the same judge and are pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.  Navistar’s deadline to respond or otherwise plead to all three lawsuits is September 10, 2014.
Based on our assessment of the facts underlying the claims in the above actions, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of these claims may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Westbrook vs. Navistar. et. al.
In April 2011, a False Claims Act qui tam complaint against Navistar, Inc., Navistar Defense, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("Navistar Defense"), and unrelated third parties was unsealed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the "Court"). The complaint was initially filed under seal in August 2010 by a qui tam relator ("Westbrook") on behalf of the federal government. The complaint alleged violations of the False Claims Act based on

33
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

allegations that parts of vehicles delivered by Navistar Defense were not painted according to the contract specification, and improper activities in dealing with one of the vendors who painted certain of the vehicle parts. The complaint seeks monetary damages and civil penalties on behalf of the federal government, as well as costs and expenses. After the complaint was unsealed, the U.S. government notified the Court that it declined to intervene at that time. Navistar, Inc. was served with the complaint in July 2011, and a scheduling order and a revised scheduling order was entered by the Court. In December 2011, the Court granted a motion by Navistar, Inc. and Navistar Defense, along with the other named defendants to judicially estop Westbrook and his affiliated company from participating in any recovery from the action, and to substitute his bankruptcy trustee (the "Trustee") as the only person with standing to pursue Westbrook's claims. In March 2012, the Court granted motions by Navistar, Inc., Navistar Defense, and the other named defendants to dismiss the complaint. The dismissal was without prejudice and the Trustee filed an amended complaint in April 2012. In May 2012, Navistar, Inc., Navistar Defense, and the other named defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint. In addition, the parties jointly filed a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the motions to dismiss. In July 2012, the Court granted all of the defendants' motions to dismiss with prejudice, dismissing all of the claims except the claim against Navistar Defense for retaliation and the claim against Navistar, Inc. for retaliation, which was dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint including only the retaliation claims against Navistar Defense and Navistar, Inc. The Trustee did not file a retaliation claim against Navistar, Inc. and voluntarily dismissed without prejudice the retaliation claim against Navistar Defense. The Trustee also filed a motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of the False Claims Act claims against Navistar Defense which the Court denied. The Court issued final judgment dismissing the matter in July 2012. Westbrook filed a notice of appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ("Fifth Circuit") in August 2012 as to the final judgment and the motion for reconsideration as to Navistar Defense only. The Trustee filed a separate notice of appeal to the Fifth Circuit in August 2012 as to several district court orders, including the December 2011 order holding the Trustee, not Westbrook, to be the proper party in the case. In December 2012, Navistar Defense's motion to dismiss Westbrook's appeal was denied "without prejudice to reconsideration by the oral argument panel" by the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit heard oral arguments on both appeals in November 2013. On May 5, 2014, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the Court dismissing the original relator, Westbrook, for lack of standing, and the judgment of the Court dismissing the amended complaint for failure to state a claim. On June 11, 2014, the Fifth Circuit denied the Trustee’s petition for rehearing. On June 19, 2014, the Fifth Circuit issued its mandate affirming the judgment of the District Court.
EPA Notice of Violation
In February 2012, Navistar, Inc. received a Notice of Violation ("NOV") from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"). The NOV pertains to approximately 7,600 diesel engines which, according to the EPA, were produced by Navistar, Inc. in 2010 and, therefore, should have met the EPA's 2010 emissions standards. Navistar, Inc. previously provided information to the EPA showing that the engines were in fact produced in 2009. The NOV contains the EPA's conclusion that Navistar, Inc.'s alleged production of the engines in 2010 violated the Federal Clean Air Act. The NOV states that the EPA reserves the right to file an administrative complaint or to refer this matter to the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") with a recommendation that a civil complaint be filed in federal district court. In July 2014, the DOJ informed Navistar that the matter had been referred to the DOJ.
Based on our assessment of the facts underlying the NOV above, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of this matter may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
CARB Notice of Violation
In April 2013, Navistar, Inc. received a notice of violation and proposed settlement ("Notice") from the California Air Resources Board ("CARB"). The Notice alleges violations of the California regulations relating to verification of after-treatment devices and proposed civil penalties of approximately $2.5 million , among other proposed settlement terms. Beginning in June 2013, the Company has made settlement offers to CARB and remains in discussions regarding this matter.
Based on our assessment of the facts underlying the Notice from CARB, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of this matter may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

34
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Shareholder Litigation
In March 2013, a putative class action complaint, alleging securities fraud was filed against us by the Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund - Lake County and Vicinity, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated purchasers of our common stock between the period of November 3, 2010 and August 1, 2012. A second class action complaint was filed in April 2013 by the Norfolk County Retirement System, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated purchasers of our common stock between the period of June 9, 2010 and August 1, 2012. A third class action complaint was filed in April 2013 by Jane C. Purnell FBO Purnell Family Trust, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated purchasers of our common stock between the period of November 3, 2010 and August 1, 2012. Each complaint named us as well as Daniel C. Ustian, our former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Andrew J. Cederoth, our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as defendants. These complaints (collectively, the "10b-5 Cases") contain similar factual allegations which include, among other things, that we violated the federal securities laws by knowingly issuing materially false and misleading statements concerning our financial condition and future business prospects and that we misrepresented and omitted material facts concerning the timing and likelihood of EPA certification of our EGR technology to meet 2010 EPA emission standards. The plaintiffs in these matters seek compensatory damages and attorneys' fees, among other relief. In May 2013, an order was entered transferring and consolidating all cases before one judge and in July 2013, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff's counsel. The lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint in October 2013.  The consolidated amended complaint enlarged the proposed class period to June 9, 2009 through August 1, 2012, and named fourteen additional current and former directors and officers as defendants. The defendants filed Motions to Dismiss on December 17, 2013. On July 22, 2014, the Court granted the defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and gave the lead plaintiff leave to file a second consolidated amended complaint by August 22, 2014. On August 22, 2014, the plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint, which narrows the claims in two ways. First, the plaintiff abandoned its claims against the majority of the defendants. The plaintiff now brings claims against only Navistar, Dan Ustian, A.J. Cederoth, Jack Allen, and Eric Tech. The plaintiff also shortened the putative class period. In the prior complaint, the class period began on June 9, 2009. In the Second Amended Complaint, it begins on March 10, 2010. Defendants expect to file their Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on September 23, 2014.  The Court has ordered a briefing schedule and set a ruling date for February 17, 2015.
In March 2013, James Gould filed a derivative complaint on behalf of the Company against us and certain of our current and former directors and former officers. The complaint alleges, among other things, that certain of our current and former directors and former officers committed a breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and were unjustly enriched in relation to similar factual allegations made in the 10b-5 Cases. The plaintiff in this matter seeks compensatory damages, certain corporate governance reforms, certain injunctive relief, disgorgement of the proceeds of certain defendants' profits from the sale of Company stock, and attorneys' fees, among other relief. Pursuant to a court order in May 2013, this matter has been stayed until the outcome of any motion to dismiss in the 10b-5 Cases. On July 31, 2014, the parties filed a status report informing the court that defendants’ motion to dismiss the 10b-5 case had been granted and stating that a proposed scheduling order or further stay order would be filed on or before September 2, 2014. Pursuant to a court order on August 27, 2014, this matter has been stayed pending a ruling on the anticipated motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 cases.
Each of these matters is pending in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois.
In August 2013, Abbie Griffin filed a derivative complaint in the State of Delaware Court of Chancery, on behalf of the Company and all similarly situated stockholders, against the Company, as the nominal defendant, and certain of our current and former directors and former officers. The complaint alleges, among other things, that certain of our current and former directors and former officers committed a breach of fiduciary duty, in relation to similar factual allegations made in the 10b-5 Cases. The plaintiff in this matter seeks compensatory damages, certain corporate governance reforms, certain injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees, among other relief. Pursuant to a court order in August 2013, this matter has been stayed until the outcome of any motion to dismiss in the 10b-5 Cases. On August 5, 2014, the parties filed a status report with the court requesting that the August 2013 stay order remain in place pending a ruling on the anticipated motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 cases.
Based on our assessment of the facts underlying these matters described above, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of these matters may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
In April 2011, the Company filed a complaint against Deloitte and Touche LLP ("Deloitte"). In December 2012, the parties reached a settlement. As a result of this settlement in the first quarter of 2013, the Company received cash proceeds of $35

35
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

million , which were recorded as a gain to Other expense (income), net, in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations .
Other
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Inquiry
In June 2012, Navistar received an informal inquiry from the Chicago Office of the Enforcement Division of the SEC seeking a number of categories of documents for the periods dating back to November 1, 2010, relating to various accounting and disclosure issues. We received a formal order of private investigation in July 2012. We have received subsequent subpoenas from the SEC in connection with their inquiry, and we continue our full cooperation with the SEC in this matter. Based on our assessment of the facts underlying these matters described above, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of these matters may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Non-Conformance Penalties
In January 2012, the EPA promulgated the Interim Final Rule establishing non-conformance penalties ("NCPs") for heavy-duty diesel ("HDD") engines, and we began using NCPs for trucks using certain of our HDD engines in 2012. Also in January 2012, the EPA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for a final NCP rule (the "Final Rule"), which proposed to make NCPs available in model years 2012 and later for emissions of NOx above the 0.20g limit for both medium and heavy HDD engines. The EPA promulgated the Final Rule for heavy HDD engines in September 2012. The Final Rule did not include NCPs for medium HDD engines. Certain of the Company's competitors challenged in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals both the Final Rule and the certificates issued under the Final Rule. On December 11, 2013, the D.C. Circuit Court issued an opinion vacating the Final Rule. On February 10, 2014, the EPA filed a petition for panel rehearing asking the D.C. Circuit to reconsider that portion of its opinion vacating the Final Rule. In April 2014, EPA withdrew its request for rehearing of the Final Rule decision. The Petitioners simultaneously moved to dismiss their appeals of the 2013 NCP certificates. We expect that these developments will effectively conclude these legal matters. To the extent we are required to pay additional NCPs related to prior period model years, we do not expect them to be material. In the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , the North America Truck segment recorded charges totaling less than $1 million and $2 million , respectively, for NCPs for certain engine sales, compared to charges totaling $7 million and $29 million in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , respectively.

13. Segment Reporting
The following is a description of our four reporting segments:
•
Our North America Truck segment manufactures and distributes Class 4 through 8 trucks, buses, and military vehicles under the International and IC Bus ("IC") brands, along with production of engines under the MaxxForce brand name, in the North America markets that include sales in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. In an effort to strengthen and maintain our dealer network, this segment occasionally acquires and operates dealer locations for the purpose of transitioning ownership.
•
Our North America Parts segment provides customers with proprietary products needed to support the International commercial and military truck, IC Bus, MaxxForce engine lines, as well as our other product lines. Our North America Parts segment also provides a wide selection of other standard truck, trailer, and engine aftermarket parts. At July 31, 2014 , this segment operated eleven regional parts distribution centers that provide 24-hour availability and shipment. Also included in the North America Parts segment are the operating results of BDP, which manages the sourcing, merchandising, and distribution of certain service parts we sell to Ford in North America.
•
Our Global Operations segment includes businesses that derive their revenue from outside our core North America markets and primarily consists of the IIAA (formerly MWM) engine and truck operations in Brazil and our export truck and parts businesses. The IIAA engine operations produce diesel engines, primarily under contract manufacturing arrangements, as well as under the MWM brand, for sale to OEMs in South America.
•
Our Financial Services segment provides retail, wholesale, and lease financing of products sold by the North America Truck and North America Parts segments and their dealers within the U.S. and Mexico, as well as financing for wholesale accounts and selected retail accounts receivable.
Corporate contains those items that are not included in our four segments.

36
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Segment Profit (Loss)
We define segment profit (loss) as Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Navistar International Corporation excluding Income tax benefit (expense) . The following tables present selected financial information for our reporting segments:
(in millions)
North America Truck
North America Parts
Global Operations
Financial
Services (A)
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
External sales and revenues, net
$
1,801

$
610

$
395

$
38

$
—

$
2,844

Intersegment sales and revenues
113

11

12

22

(158
)
—

Total sales and revenues, net
$
1,914

$
621

$
407

$
60

$
(158
)
$
2,844

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax
$
(12
)
$
127

$
(2
)
$
24

$
(140
)
$
(3
)
Income tax expense
—

—

—

—

(14
)
(14
)
Segment profit (loss)
$
(12
)
$
127

$
(2
)
$
24

$
(126
)
$
11

Depreciation and amortization
$
41

$
4

$
8

$
12

$
6

$
71

Interest expense
—

—

—

18

60

78

Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates
1

1

—

—

—

2

Capital expenditures (B)
4

—

2

—

1

7

(in millions)
North America Truck
North America Parts
Global Operations
Financial
Services (A)
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Three Months Ended July 31, 2013
External sales and revenues, net
$
1,761

$
583

$
476

$
41

$
—

$
2,861

Intersegment sales and revenues
135

13

23

20

(191
)
—

Total sales and revenues, net
$
1,896

$
596

$
499

$
61

$
(191
)
$
2,861

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax
$
(143
)
$
98

$
(22
)
$
23

$
(193
)
$
(237
)
Income tax expense
—

—

—

—

(16
)
(16
)
Segment profit (loss)
$
(143
)
$
98

$
(22
)
$
23

$
(177
)
$
(221
)
Depreciation and amortization
$
59

$
5

$
9

$
10

$
5

$
88

Interest expense
—

—

—

17

59

76

Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates
2

1

—

—

—

3

Capital expenditures (B)
20

1

4

—

4

29

(in millions)
North America Truck
North America Parts
Global Operations
Financial
Services (A)
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
External sales and revenues, net
$
4,758

$
1,818

$
1,107

$
115

$
—

$
7,798

Intersegment sales and revenues
330

33

26

57

(446
)
—

Total sales and revenues, net
$
5,088

$
1,851

$
1,133

$
172

$
(446
)
$
7,798

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax
$
(353
)
$
357

$
(185
)
$
71

$
(440
)
$
(550
)
Income tax expense
—

—

—

—

(25
)
(25
)
Segment profit (loss)
$
(353
)
$
357

$
(185
)
$
71

$
(415
)
$
(525
)
Depreciation and amortization
$
168

$
12

$
24

$
33

$
19

$
256

Interest expense
—

—

—

52

182

234

Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates
3

3

(1
)
—

—

5

Capital expenditures (B)
42

5

6

1

3

57


37
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

(in millions)
North America Truck
North America Parts
Global Operations
Financial
Services (A)
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2013
External sales and revenues, net
$
4,694

$
1,873

$
1,338

$
119

$
—

$
8,024

Intersegment sales and revenues
382

45

60

59

(546
)
—

Total sales and revenues, net
$
5,076

$
1,918

$
1,398

$
178

$
(546
)
$
8,024

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax
$
(547
)
$
329

$
—

$
64

$
(550
)
$
(704
)
Income tax expense
—

—

—

—

(53
)
(53
)
Segment profit (loss)
$
(547
)
$
329

$
—

$
64

$
(497
)
$
(651
)
Depreciation and amortization
$
244

$
13

$
27

$
29

$
17

$
330

Interest expense
—

—

—

52

188

240

Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates
7

4

(5
)
—

—

6

Capital expenditures (B)
113

2

11

1

9

136

(in millions)
North America Truck
North America Parts
Global Operations
Financial
Services
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Segment assets, as of:
July 31, 2014
$
2,355

$
704

$
816

$
2,504

$
1,323

$
7,702

October 31, 2013
2,250

716

1,162

2,355

1,832

8,315

_________________________
(A)
Total sales and revenues in the Financial Services segment include interest revenues of $44 million and $126 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , respectively and $47 million and $140 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , respectively.
(B)
Exclusive of purchases of equipment leased to others.
14. Stockholders' Deficit
Stockholder Rights Plan
In June 2012, our Board of Directors adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan (the "Rights Plan") and initially declared a dividend of one right on each outstanding share of the Company's common stock held of record as of the close of business on June 29, 2012. In July 2013, the Rights Plan was amended to increase the level of beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock to less than 20% of outstanding common stock of the Company and to exclude persons who beneficially owned less than 20% of outstanding common stock at the time of announcement of entry into the Rights Plan. Pursuant to the Rights Plan, each share of common stock of the Company is now associated with one preferred stock purchase right. Each right entitles the holder to buy a unit representing one one-thousandth of a share of a new series of preferred stock of the Company for $140.00. Under certain circumstances, if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the Company's common stock, each right (other than rights held by the acquirer) will, unless the rights are redeemed by the Company, become exercisable, and upon payment of the exercise price of $140.00, the holder of the right will receive that number of shares of common stock of the Company having a market value of twice the exercise price of the right. The rights may be redeemed by the Company for $0.001 per right at any time until the tenth business day following the first public announcement of the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the Company's common stock. Additionally, the July 2013 amendment extended the expiration date of the Rights Plan to June 18, 2015. At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders in March 2014, a non-binding advisory vote to terminate the Rights Plan was proposed and approved. On June 17, 2014, the Rights Plan was further amended to have the plan expire on July 1, 2014.
On June 23, 2014, prior to expiration of the Rights Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the company’s Rights Plan that, in essence, turns the existing Stockholder Rights Plan into a Tax Asset Protection Plan. This Tax Asset Protection Plan was adopted to protect the long-term value of Navistar’s substantial tax assets and was set to expire on September 1, 2014. On August 29, 2014 the Tax Asset Protection Plan was further amended to extend the expiration date until November 3, 2014.


38
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

October 2012 Issuance of Common Stock
In October 2012, the Company completed a public offering of 10,666,666 shares of NIC common stock at a price of $18.75 per share and received proceeds, net of underwriting discounts, commissions, and offering expenses, of $192 million . In connection with the public offering, in November 2012, the underwriters elected to exercise a portion of an over-allotment option and purchased an additional 763,534 shares of NIC common stock at a price of $18.75 per share. The Company received proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, of $14 million in the three months ended January 31, 2013.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following tables display the changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax, by component for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 :
(in millions)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Defined Benefit Plan
Total
Balance as of April 30, 2014
$
(89
)
$
(1,699
)
$
(1,788
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(3
)
7

4

Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
—

26

26

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
(3
)
33

30

Balance as of July 31, 2014
$
(92
)
$
(1,666
)
$
(1,758
)
(in millions)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Defined Benefit Plan
Total
Balance as of October 31, 2013
$
(75
)
$
(1,749
)
$
(1,824
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(17
)
5

(12
)
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
—

78

78

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
(17
)
83

66

Balance as of July 31, 2014
$
(92
)
$
(1,666
)
$
(1,758
)
The following table displays the amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss and the affected line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations :
Location in Consolidated
Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
Defined benefit plans
Amortization of prior service costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
$
(1
)
$
(3
)
Amortization of actuarial loss
Selling, general and administrative expenses
28

82

Total before tax
27

79

Tax benefit
(1
)
(1
)
Net of tax
$
26

$
78

Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax
$
26

$
78


39
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

15. Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Navistar International Corporation
The following table presents the information used in the calculation of our basic and diluted income (loss) per share for continuing operations, discontinued operations, and net loss, all attributable to Navistar International Corporation:
Three Months Ended July 31,
Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions, except per share data)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Numerator:
Amounts attributable to Navistar International Corporation common stockholders:
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax
$
(3
)
$
(237
)
$
(550
)
$
(704
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
1

(10
)
3

(40
)
Net loss
$
(2
)
$
(247
)
$
(547
)
$
(744
)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
81.4

80.6

81.3

80.4

Effect of dilutive securities
—

—

—

—

Diluted
81.4

80.6

81.3

80.4

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Navistar International Corporation:
Basic:
Continuing operations
$
(0.04
)
$
(2.94
)
$
(6.77
)
$
(8.76
)
Discontinued operations
0.02

(0.12
)
0.04

(0.49
)
Net loss
$
(0.02
)
$
(3.06
)
$
(6.73
)
$
(9.25
)
Diluted:
Continuing operations
$
(0.04
)
$
(2.94
)
$
(6.77
)
$
(8.76
)
Discontinued operations
0.02

(0.12
)
0.04

(0.49
)
Net loss
$
(0.02
)
$
(3.06
)
$
(6.73
)
$
(9.25
)
The conversion rate on our 2014 Convertible Notes is 19.891 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2014 Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of $50.27 per share of common stock. In connection with the sale of the 2014 Convertible Notes, we sold warrants to various counterparties to purchase shares of our common stock from us at an exercise price of $60.14 per share. The 2014 Convertible Notes and warrants are anti-dilutive when calculating diluted earnings per share when our average stock price is less than $50.27 and $60.14 , respectively. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company unwound warrants representing 6.5 million shares associated with the repurchased 2014 Convertible Notes.
We also purchased call options in connection with the sale of the 2014 Convertible Notes, covering 11.3 million shares at an exercise price of $50.27 per share, which are intended to minimize share dilution associated with the 2014 Convertible Notes; however under accounting guidance, these call options cannot be utilized to offset the dilution of the 2014 Convertible Notes for determining diluted earnings per share as they are anti-dilutive. During the second quarter of 2014, call options representing 8.0 million shares expired or were unwound by the Company.
The conversion rate on our 4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018 (the "2018 Convertible Notes"), is 17.1233 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2018 Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $58.40 per share of common stock. The 2018 Convertible Notes are anti-dilutive when calculating diluted earnings per share when our average stock price is less than $58.40 .
The conversion rate on our 2019 Convertible Notes is 18.4946 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $54.07 per share of common stock. The 2019 Convertible Notes are anti-dilutive when calculating diluted earnings per share when our average stock price is less than $54.07 .
The computation of diluted earnings per share also excludes outstanding options and other common stock equivalents in periods where inclusion of such potential common stock instruments would be anti-dilutive.
For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 , no dilutive securities were included in the computation of diluted loss per share since they would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss attributable to Navistar International Corporation. Additionally, certain securities would have been excluded from the computation of earnings per share, as our average stock

40
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

price was less than their respective exercise prices. For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 the aggregate shares not included were 23.8 million and 26.2 million , respectively. For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , the aggregate shares not included were 29.5 million and 28.9 million , respectively.
For the three months ended July 31, 2014 , the aggregate shares not included in the computation of earnings per share were primarily comprised of 4.8 million shares related to warrants, 3.3 million shares related to the 2014 Convertible Notes, 3.4 million shares related to the 2018 Convertible Notes, and 7.6 million shares related to the 2019 Convertible Notes.
For the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , the aggregate shares not included in the computation of earnings per share were primarily comprised of 7.0 million shares related to the warrants, 6.0 million shares related to the 2014 Convertible Notes, 3.4 million shares related to the 2018 Convertible Notes, and 5.1 million shares related to the 2019 Convertible Notes.
For both the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , the aggregate shares not included in the computation of earnings per share were primarily comprised of 11.3 million shares related to the warrants and 11.3 million shares related to the 2014 Convertible Notes.
16. Condensed Consolidating Guarantor and Non-guarantor Financial Information
The following tables set forth condensed consolidating balance sheets as of July 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 , condensed consolidating statements of operations and condensed consolidating statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 , and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 .
The information is presented as a result of Navistar, Inc.’s guarantee, exclusive of its subsidiaries, of NIC’s indebtedness under our 8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, and obligations under our Loan Agreement related to the 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040. Navistar, Inc. is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of NIC. None of NIC’s other subsidiaries guarantee any of these notes or bonds. The guarantees are "full and unconditional", as those terms are used in Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, except that the guarantees will be automatically released in certain customary circumstances, such as when the subsidiary is sold or all of the assets of the subsidiary are sold, the capital stock is sold, when the subsidiary is designated as an "unrestricted subsidiary" for purposes of the respective indenture for each of the 8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, and the 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040, upon liquidation or dissolution of the subsidiary or upon legal or covenant defeasance, or satisfaction and discharge of the notes or bonds. Separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning Navistar, Inc. have not been presented because management believes that such information is not material to investors. Within this disclosure only, "NIC" includes the financial results of the parent company only, with all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method. Likewise, "Navistar, Inc.," for purposes of this disclosure only, includes the consolidated financial results of its wholly-owned subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method and its operating units accounted for on a consolidated basis. "Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries" includes the combined financial results of all other non-guarantor subsidiaries. "Eliminations and Other" includes all eliminations and reclassifications to reconcile to the consolidated financial statements. NIC files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return that includes Navistar, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries. Navistar, Inc. has a tax allocation agreement ("Tax Agreement") with NIC which requires Navistar, Inc. to compute its separate federal income tax liability and remit any resulting tax liability to NIC. Tax benefits that may arise from net operating losses of Navistar, Inc. are not refunded to Navistar, Inc. but may be used to offset future required tax payments under the Tax Agreement. The effect of the Tax Agreement is to allow NIC, the parent company, rather than Navistar, Inc., to utilize current U.S. taxable losses of Navistar, Inc. and all other direct or indirect subsidiaries of NIC.

41
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net
$
—

$
1,962

$
2,181

$
(1,299
)
$
2,844

Costs of products sold
—

1,761

1,938

(1,282
)
2,417

Restructuring charges
—

(1
)
17

—

16

Asset impairment charges
—

13

(11
)
2

4

All other operating expenses (income)
17

246

141

(16
)
388

Total costs and expenses
17

2,019

2,085

(1,296
)
2,825

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates
15

17

1

(31
)
2

Income (loss) before income taxes
(2
)
(40
)
97

(34
)
21

Income tax expense
—

(2
)
(12
)
—

(14
)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
(2
)
(42
)
85

(34
)
7

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
—

—

1

—

1

Net income (loss)
(2
)
(42
)
86

(34
)
8

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
—

—

10

—

10

Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(2
)
$
(42
)
$
76

$
(34
)
$
(2
)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(2
)
$
(42
)
$
76

$
(34
)
$
(2
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(3
)
—

(3
)
3

(3
)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of$(3),$0,$(3), $3, and, $(3), respectively)
33

23

10

(33
)
33

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
30

23

7

(30
)
30

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
28

$
(19
)
$
83

$
(64
)
$
28



42
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net
$
—

$
5,279

$
5,971

$
(3,452
)
$
7,798

Costs of products sold
—

4,983

5,331

(3,415
)
6,899

Restructuring charges
—

9

18

—

27

Asset impairment charges
—

13

160

—

173

All other operating expenses
94

760

389

(44
)
1,199

Total costs and expenses
94

5,765

5,898

(3,459
)
8,298

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates
(466
)
(135
)
2

604

5

Income (loss) before income taxes
(560
)
(621
)
75

611

(495
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
13

(3
)
(35
)
—

(25
)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
(547
)
(624
)
40

611

(520
)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
—

—

3

—

3

Net income (loss)
(547
)
(624
)
43

611

(517
)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
—

—

30

—

30

Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(547
)
$
(624
)
$
13

$
611

$
(547
)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(547
)
$
(624
)
$
13

$
611

$
(547
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(17
)
—

(17
)
17

(17
)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $(4), $0, $(4), $4, and, $(4), respectively)
83

73

10

(83
)
83

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
66

73

(7
)
(66
)
66

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(481
)
$
(551
)
$
6

$
545

$
(481
)



43
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2014
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
136

$
38

$
373

$
—

$
547

Marketable securities
266

—

352

—

618

Restricted cash
18

3

100

—

121

Finance and other receivables, net
3

125

2,490

(15
)
2,603

Inventories
—

815

659

(12
)
1,462

Investments in non-consolidated affiliates
(6,526
)
6,450

68

80

72

Property and equipment, net
—

871

783

3

1,657

Goodwill
—

—

38

—

38

Deferred taxes, net
1

13

178

—

192

Other
36

148

211

(3
)
392

Total assets
$
(6,066
)
$
8,463

$
5,252

$
53

$
7,702

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Debt
$
2,119

$
948

$
2,142

$
(5
)
$
5,204

Postretirement benefits liabilities
—

2,298

231

—

2,529

Amounts due to (from) affiliates
(7,472
)
11,620

(4,292
)
144

—

Other liabilities
3,367

478

248

(78
)
4,015

Total liabilities
(1,986
)
15,344

(1,671
)
61

11,748

Redeemable equity securities
2

—

—

—

2

Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interest
—

—

34

—

34

Stockholders’ equity (deficit) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
(4,082
)
(6,881
)
6,889

(8
)
(4,082
)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
$
(6,066
)
$
8,463

$
5,252

$
53

$
7,702

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operations
$
(528
)
$
(1,078
)
$
156

$
1,106

$
(344
)
Cash flows from investment activities
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents
6

—

(36
)
—

(30
)
Net sales of marketable securities
315

—

(103
)
—

212

Capital expenditures and purchase of equipment leased to others
—

(89
)
(125
)
—

(214
)
Other investing activities
—

22

24

—

46

Net cash provided by (used in) investment activities
321

(67
)
(240
)
—

14

Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (repayments) of debt
(11
)
1,067

192

(1,136
)
112

Other financing activities
18

44

(70
)
30

22

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
7

1,111

122

(1,106
)
134

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
—

—

(12
)
—

(12
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(200
)
(34
)
26

—

(208
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
336

72

347

—

755

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
136

$
38

$
373

$
—

$
547


44
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net
$
—

$
1,690

$
2,300

$
(1,129
)
$
2,861

Costs of products sold
—

1,669

1,996

(1,118
)
2,547

Restructuring charges
—

1

5

—

6

Asset impairment charges
—

14

3

—

17

All other operating expenses (income)
28

295

203

(21
)
505

Total costs and expenses
28

1,979

2,207

(1,139
)
3,075

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates
(219
)
13

3

206

3

Income (loss) before income taxes
(247
)
(276
)
96

216

(211
)
Income tax expense
—

(2
)
(14
)
—

(16
)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
(247
)
(278
)
82

216

(227
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
—

—

(10
)
—

(10
)
Net income (loss)
(247
)
(278
)
72

216

(237
)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
—

—

10

—

10

Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(247
)
$
(278
)
$
62

$
216

$
(247
)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(247
)
$
(278
)
$
62

$
216

$
(247
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(91
)
—

(91
)
91

(91
)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $1, $0, $1, $(1) and, $1, respectively)
39

35

4

(39
)
39

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
(52
)
35

(87
)
52

(52
)
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(299
)
$
(243
)
$
(25
)
$
268

$
(299
)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net
$
—

$
4,792

$
6,851

$
(3,619
)
$
8,024

Costs of products sold
—

4,886

5,892

(3,582
)
7,196

Restructuring charges
—

5

9

—

14

Asset impairment charges
—

14

3

—

17

All other operating expenses
1

875

520

24

1,420

Total costs and expenses
1

5,780

6,424

(3,558
)
8,647

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates
(743
)
117

2

630

6

Income (loss) before income taxes
(744
)
(871
)
429

569

(617
)
Income tax expense
—

(14
)
(39
)
—

(53
)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
(744
)
(885
)
390

569

(670
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
—

—

(40
)
—

(40
)
Net income (loss)
(744
)
(885
)
350

569

(710
)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
—

—

34

—

34

Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(744
)
$
(885
)
$
316

$
569

$
(744
)

45
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(744
)
$
(885
)
$
316

$
569

$
(744
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(71
)
—

(71
)
71

(71
)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $2, $0, $2, $(2), and, $2, respectively)
117

105

12

(117
)
117

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
46

105

(59
)
(46
)
46

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
$
(698
)
$
(780
)
$
257

$
523

$
(698
)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2013
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
336

$
72

$
347

$
—

$
755

Marketable securities
581

1

248

—

830

Restricted cash
23

3

65

—

91

Finance and other receivables, net
3

148

2,561

(11
)
2,701

Inventories
—

621

608

(19
)
1,210

Investments in non-consolidated affiliates
(6,123
)
6,600

73

(473
)
77

Property and equipment, net
—

937

807

(3
)
1,741

Goodwill
—

—

184

—

184

Deferred taxes, net
—

13

219

(1
)
231

Other
36

156

304

(1
)
495

Total assets
$
(5,144
)
$
8,551

$
5,416

$
(508
)
$
8,315

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Debt
$
2,125

$
1,002

$
1,960

$
(2
)
$
5,085

Postretirement benefits liabilities
—

2,407

245

—

2,652

Amounts due to (from) affiliates
(6,988
)
10,846

(3,932
)
74

—

Other liabilities
3,362

646

250

(79
)
4,179

Total liabilities
(1,501
)
14,901

(1,477
)
(7
)
11,916

Redeemable equity securities
4

—

—

—

4

Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interest
—

—

44

—

44

Stockholders’ equity (deficit) attributable to Navistar International Corporation
(3,647
)
(6,350
)
6,849

(501
)
(3,649
)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
$
(5,144
)
$
8,551

$
5,416

$
(508
)
$
8,315


46
Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operations
$
(771
)
$
(639
)
$
382

$
1,062

$
34

Cash flows from investment activities
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents
(1
)
2

(10
)
—

(9
)
Net purchases of marketable securities
(147
)
—

(95
)
—

(242
)
Capital expenditures and purchase of equipment leased to others
—

(347
)
(140
)
—

(487
)
Other investing activities
—

10

37

—

47

Net cash used in investment activities
(148
)
(335
)
(208
)
—

(691
)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (repayments) of debt
340

688

(220
)
(1,062
)
(254
)
Other financing activities
26

277

(35
)
—

268

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
366

965

(255
)
(1,062
)
14

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
—

—

(19
)
—

(19
)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(553
)
(9
)
(100
)
—

(662
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
702

55

330

—

1,087

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
149

$
46

$
230

$
—

$
425


47

Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation ("MD&A") is designed to provide information that is supplemental to, and should be read together with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013. Information in MD&A is intended to assist the reader in obtaining an understanding of (i) our consolidated financial statements, (ii) the changes in certain key items within those financial statements from year-to-year, (iii) the primary factors that contributed to those changes, (iv) any changes in known trends or uncertainties from items disclosed within the MD&A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 that we are aware of and that may have a material effect on our future performance, and (v) how certain accounting principles affect our consolidated financial statements. In addition, MD&A provides information about our business segments and how the results of those segments impact our results of operations and financial condition as a whole. Operating results for interim reporting periods are not necessarily indicative of annual operating results.
Executive Overview
Navistar is an international manufacturer of International ® brand commercial and military trucks, MaxxForce ® brand diesel engines, IC Bus™ ("IC") brand school and commercial buses, as well as a provider of service parts for trucks and diesel engines. Our core business is the North American truck and parts markets, where we principally participate in the U.S. and Canada School bus and Class 6 through 8 medium and heavy trucks (our "Traditional" markets). We also provide retail, wholesale, and lease financing services for our trucks and parts.
We operate in four reporting segments: North America Truck, North America Parts, Global Operations (collectively called "Manufacturing operations"), and Financial Services, which consists of Navistar Financial Corporation ("NFC") and our foreign finance operations (collectively called "Financial Services operations").
Third Quarter Summary
We continue to make progress on our "Drive-to-Deliver" turnaround plan. We believe we are taking the necessary actions to improve our future performance. Also, we continue to evaluate our portfolio of assets, with the purpose of closing or divesting non-core/non-strategic businesses, and identifying opportunities to restructure our business and rationalize our Manufacturing operations in an effort to optimize our cost structure.
The industry for our Traditional markets is improving. We now anticipate the truck industry retail deliveries for our Traditional markets to fall in the upper-end of our estimated 2014 range. In the third quarter of 2014, the truck industry retail deliveries for our Traditional markets were up 17% compared to the prior year quarter. While our market share recovery has been slower than expected, our production, backlog, and chargeouts continue to strengthen year over year. Our chargeouts of trucks in our Traditional markets were up 10% , reflecting a 24% increase in Class 8 Heavy trucks.
Financial Summary
•
Continuing Operating Results —In the third quarter of 2014, our consolidated net sales and revenues were $2.8 billion , down 1% compared to the prior year quarter. The 1% decrease reflects lower sales in our Global Operations segment, partially offset by increased sales in our North America Truck and North America Parts segments. In the first nine months of 2014 , our consolidated net sales and revenues were $7.8 billion , down 3% compared to the first nine months of 2013. The 3% decrease reflects lower sales from our Global Operations and North America Parts segments.
The improvement by the North America Truck segment reflects improved Traditional truck volumes. This increase was partially offset by lower military sales, reflecting lower demand for our military products and services. Also contributing to the relative increase in sales in the first nine months of 2014 in the North America Truck segment were out-of-period adjustments of $113 million recorded during the second quarter of 2013.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes was $21 million in the third quarter of 2014 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $211 million in the third quarter of 2013. Loss from continuing operations was $495 million in first nine months of 2014 compared to a loss of $617 million in the first nine months of 2013.
The improvement in our comparative results in the third quarter of 2014 was primarily driven by a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties, lower structural costs (include selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses and engineering and product development costs) and lower asset impairment charges. In the third quarter of 2014, we recorded a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $29 million , compared to a charge for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $48 million in the third quarter of 2013. In addition, structural costs were lower by $86 million , or 21% , reflecting the impact of our cost-reduction and other initiatives.

48

In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, we recognized income tax expense from continuing operations of $14 million and $25 million , respectively, compared to expense of $16 million and $53 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2013, respectively. The income tax expense in the first nine months of 2014 included charges of $29 million for the establishment of a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets related to our Brazilian operations, partially offset by a benefit of $13 million resulting from the application of the intraperiod tax allocation rules due to the issuance and repurchase of our convertible notes.
After income taxes, the loss from continuing operations attributable to Navistar International Corporation was $3 million and $550 million , or $0.04 and $6.77 , per diluted share, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, compared to a loss of $237 million and $704 million , or $2.94 and $8.76 per diluted share, respectively, in the respective prior year periods.
•
Liquidity —We ended the third quarter of 2014 with $1.17 billion of consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, compared to $1.59 billion as of October 31, 2013. The decrease in consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities was primarily attributable to spending related to warranty claims, debt servicing payments, contributions to our defined benefit pension plans, and capital expenditures.
During the second quarter of 2014, the Company completed the private sale of $411 million of the 2019 Convertible Notes, including certain over-allotment options exercised. The Company used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2019 Convertible Notes, as well as cash on-hand, to repurchase $404 million of notional amount of the 2014 Convertible Notes. In conjunction with the repurchases, the Company unwound a portion of the call options and warrants associated with the repurchased 2014 Convertible Notes.

49

Results of Continuing Operations
The following information summarizes our Consolidated Statements of Operations and illustrates the key financial indicators used to assess our consolidated financial results.
Results of Operations for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 as compared to the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013
Three Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
(in millions, except per share data and % change)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
Sales and revenues, net
$
2,844

$
2,861

$
(17
)
(1
)%
$
7,798

$
8,024

$
(226
)
(3
)%
Costs of products sold
2,417

2,547

(130
)
(5
)%
6,899

7,196

(297
)
(4
)%
Restructuring charges
16

6

10

167
%
27

14

13

93
%
Asset impairment charges
4

17

(13
)
(76
)%
173

17

156

918
%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
241

308

(67
)
(22
)%
717

905

(188
)
(21
)%
Engineering and product development costs
80

99

(19
)
(19
)%
253

310

(57
)
(18
)%
Interest expense
78

76

2

3
%
234

240

(6
)
(3
)%
Other expense (income), net
(11
)
22

(33
)
N.M.

(5
)
(35
)
30

(86
)%
Total costs and expenses
2,825

3,075

(250
)
(8
)%
8,298

8,647

(349
)
(4
)%
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates
2

3

(1
)
(33
)%
5

6

(1
)
(17
)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
21

(211
)
232

N.M.

(495
)
(617
)
122

(20
)%
Income tax expense
(14
)
(16
)
2

(13
)%
(25
)
(53
)
28

(53
)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations
7

(227
)
234

N.M.

(520
)
(670
)
150

(22
)%
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
10

10

—

—
%
30

34

(4
)
(12
)%
Loss from continuing operations (A)
(3
)
(237
)
234

(99
)%
(550
)
(704
)
154

(22
)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
1

(10
)
11

N.M.

3

(40
)
43

N.M.

Net loss (A)
$
(2
)
$
(247
)
$
245

(99
)%
$
(547
)
$
(744
)
$
197

(26
)%
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: (A)
Continuing operations
$
(0.04
)
$
(2.94
)
$
2.90

(99
)%
$
(6.77
)
$
(8.76
)
$
1.99

(23
)%
Discontinued operations
0.02

(0.12
)
0.14

N.M.

0.04

(0.49
)
0.53

N.M.

$
(0.02
)
$
(3.06
)
$
3.04

(99
)%
$
(6.73
)
$
(9.25
)
$
2.52

(27
)%
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
81.4

80.6

0.8

1
%
81.3

80.4

0.9

1
%
_________________________
N.M.
Not meaningful.
(A)
Amounts attributable to Navistar International Corporation.
Sales and revenues, net
Our sales and revenues, net, are principally generated via sales of products and services. Sales and revenues, net, by reporting segment were as follows:
Three Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
% Change
(in millions, except % change)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
North America Truck
$
1,914

$
1,896

$
18

1
%
$
5,088

$
5,076

$
12

—
%
North America Parts
621

596

25

4
%
1,851

1,918

(67
)
(3
)%
Global Operations
407

499

(92
)
(18
)%
1,133

1,398

(265
)
(19
)%
Financial Services
60

61

(1
)
(2
)%
172

178

(6
)
(3
)%
Corporate and Eliminations
(158
)
(191
)
33

(17
)%
(446
)
(546
)
100

(18
)%
Total
$
2,844

$
2,861

$
(17
)
(1
)%
$
7,798

$
8,024

$
(226
)
(3
)%

50

In the third quarter of 2014, the North America Truck segment net sales increase of $18 million , or 1% , was primarily due to improved Traditional truck volumes, partially offset by lower military sales. In the first nine months of 2014 , the North America Truck segment net sales were flat compared to the prior year period reflecting higher truck sales volumes in our Traditional market, offset by lower military sales.
Also impacting the comparative results in sales in the North America Truck segment for the nine-month period was an out-of-period adjustment identified and recorded during the second quarter of 2013. The adjustment was related to certain third-party equipment financings by GE, which we have accounted for as borrowings. The initial transactions do not qualify for revenue recognition as we retain substantial risks of ownership in the leased property. As a result, the proceeds from the transfer are recorded as an obligation and amortized to revenue over the term of the financing. Correcting the errors resulted in a decrease of $113 million to net sales in 2013 related to prior periods.
In the third quarter of 2014, the North America Parts segment net sales increase of $25 million was primarily due to improvements in our commercial markets, partially offset by lower military sales. In the first nine months of 2014, the North America Parts segment net sales decrease of $67 million was primarily due to lower military sales, partially offset by improvements in our commercial markets.
The Global Operations segment net sales decrease of $92 million and $265 million , or 18% and 19% , respectively, for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, was primarily due to lower engine volumes in our South American engine operations due to the economic downturn in Brazil. Also impacting the change in segment revenue in the first nine months of 2014 was the unfavorable impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, and lower chargeouts from our export truck sales.
The Financial Services segment net revenues were comparable to the prior year periods, as a decline in the average finance receivables balance was offset by higher revenues from operating leases.
Costs of products sold
In the third quarter of 2014 , cost of products sold decreased by $130 million , reflecting the impact of lower net sales in the Global Operations segment. In addition, the North America Truck segment was favorably impacted by the recognition of a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties, partially offset by a shift in our Traditional market to a greater mix of higher cost units that incorporate the SCR after-treatment system.
In the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $29 million . The benefit is comprised of a benefit for changes in estimate of $59 million , partially offset by a $30 million correction of prior-period errors, primarily related to pre-existing warranties. In the third quarter of 2013, the Company recorded charges for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $48 million , reflecting an unanticipated increase in warranty spend, primarily for certain 2010 emission standard engines.
In the first nine months of 2014 , cost of products sold decreased by $297 million , reflecting the impact of lower net sales in the Global Operations and North America Parts segments. In addition, the North America Truck segment was favorably impacted by certain out-of-period adjustments that lowered cost of products sold in the first nine months of 2013 and lower charges for adjustments related to pre-existing warranties in the first nine months of 2014, partially offset by a shift in our Traditional market to a greater mix of higher cost units that incorporate the SCR after-treatment system.
As described above, in the second quarter of 2013, certain out-of-period adjustments were identified and recorded to correct prior-period errors. As a result of correcting these errors, the cost of products sold of the North America Truck segment decreased by $113 million in the first nine months of 2013.
In the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized charges for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $65 million and $252 million , respectively. Included within the warranty charge in the first nine months of 2014 are out-of-period adjustments of $24 million which were identified and recorded to correct prior-period errors, primarily related to pre-existing warranties. Also in the first nine months of 2013, we recognized a warranty recovery of $27 million. The North America Truck segment recognized the majority of the adjustments to pre-existing warranties. For more information on warranty, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.



51

Restructuring charges
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, we incurred restructuring charges of $16 million and $27 million , respectively. In the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized charges of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of its Chatham, Ontario plant, based on a ruling received from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada. The Company has appealed this ruling. In addition, in the first nine months of 2014, the Company incurred restructuring charges related to cost reduction actions that included a reduction-in-force in the U.S. For more information, see Note 3, Restructurings and Impairments , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Asset impairment charges
We recognized asset impairment charges of $4 million and $173 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , respectively, compared to charges of $17 million in comparable prior year periods.
In the second quarter of 2014, we recognized a non-cash charge of $149 million for the impairment of certain intangible assets of our Brazilian engine reporting unit. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the goodwill of our Brazilian engine reporting unit and trademark for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that the entire $142 million balance of goodwill and $7 million of trademark were impaired. For more information, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In addition, in the first nine months of 2014, the North America Truck segment recorded asset impairment charges of $23 million , of which $19 million was the result of a triggering event related to potential sales of assets requiring assessment of impairment for certain intangible and long-lived assets, reflecting our ongoing evaluation of our portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit. For more information, see Note 3, Restructurings and Impairments , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In the third quarter of 2013, we recorded asset impairment charges of $17 million, in our North America Truck segment. These charges were a result of our ongoing evaluation of our portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit, which led to the discontinuation of certain engineering programs related to products that were determined to be outside of our core operations or not performing to our expectations. For more information, see Note 3, Restructurings and Impairments , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The SG&A expenses decrease of $67 million and $188 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , respectively, reflects the impact of our cost-reduction initiatives. In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company leveraged efficiencies identified through redesigning our organizational structure and began implementing new cost-reduction initiatives, including an enterprise-wide reduction-in-force. For more information, see Note 3, Restructurings and Impairments , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Engineering and product development costs
The Engineering and product development costs decrease of $19 million and $57 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , respectively, is primarily due to project rationalization of certain engineering programs and other savings from our cost-reduction initiatives, as well as a shift in spending from projects to integrate the SCR after-treatment systems with certain engine models to projects related to cost reduction and the rationalization of content in our MaxxForce 13L engine.
Interest expense
In the third quarter of 2014, the interest expense increase of $2 million was primarily due to an increase in our average outstanding debt balance compared to 2013. The change in our average outstanding debt balance was primarily the result of the private sale of the 4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018, in October 2013, the private sale of the 2019 Convertible Notes in April 2014, and an increase in debt utilized in financing of retail finance receivables balances, partially offset by the repurchase of a portion of the 2014 Convertible Notes in April 2014.
In the first nine months of 2014, the interest expense decrease of $6 million was primarily due to the impact of certain out-of-period adjustments recorded in the second quarter of 2013, as well as the purchase of certain manufacturing equipment that was previously accounted for as a financing arrangement, related to a sale and leaseback transaction. In the first nine months of 2013, certain out-of-period adjustments were identified and recorded to correct prior-period errors. As a result of correcting these errors, a charge of $8 million was recorded in interest expense in the first nine months of 2013.
Partially offsetting this decrease was the increase in our average outstanding debt balance during the first nine months of 2014 compared to the first nine months of 2013. The change in our average outstanding debt balance was primarily the result of the issuance of additional 8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, in March 2013, the private sale of the 4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018, in October 2013, and the private sale of the 2019 Convertible Notes in April 2014, partially offset

52

by the April 2013 principal payment of $300 million against our Term Loan Credit Facility in conjunction with the repricing of that facility that lowered the interest rate and the repurchase of a portion of the 2014 Convertible Notes in April 2014.
Other expense (income), net
In the third quarter of 2014, we recognized other income of $11 million compared to other expense of $22 million in the third quarter of 2013. The increase in other income in the third quarter of 2014 is primarily driven by lower foreign exchange losses compared to the third quarter of 2013. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company was unfavorably impacted by the fluctuations of foreign exchange rates, particularly due to the weakening of the Brazilian Real against the U.S. Dollar.
The decrease in other income of $30 million in the first nine months of 2014 is due to lower foreign exchange losses and the offsetting impact of certain gains in 2013. The first nine months of 2013 included gains of $35 million related to our legal settlement with Deloitte and Touche LLP and $26 million related to the sale of the Company's interests in the Mahindra Joint Ventures, partially offset by $13 million of charges related to the $300 million principal repayment of a portion of the Term Loan Credit Facility, which primarily consisted of the write-off of related discount and debt issuance costs and a prepayment premium fee, and the impact of the fluctuations of foreign exchange rates related to the Brazilian Real, as described above.
Income tax expense
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , we recognized an income tax expense from continuing operations of $14 million and $25 million , respectively, compared to $16 million and $53 million in the respective prior year periods. The difference between the income tax expense in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013 is due to geographical mix and certain discrete items. The income tax expense in the first nine months of 2014 included charges of $29 million for the establishment of a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets related to our Brazilian operations, partially offset by a benefit of $13 million resulting from the application of the intraperiod tax allocation rules due to the issuance and repurchase of our convertible notes. In addition, 2014 income tax expense included a tax benefit of $8 million resulting from an Alabama tax settlement. The income tax expense in 2013 included expense of approximately $20 million related to audit settlements and changes to our uncertain tax positions. In both periods, the impact of income taxes on U.S. operations was limited to current state income taxes, federal refundable credits, and other discrete items, due in part to the deferred tax valuation allowances on our U.S. and certain foreign deferred tax assets.
At October 31, 2013, we had $1.7 billion of U.S. federal net operating losses and $242 million of federal tax credit carryforwards. We expect our cash payments of U.S. taxes will be minimal for as long as we are able to offset our U.S. taxable income by these U.S. net operating losses and tax credits, which have carry forward periods of up to 20 years. We maintain valuation allowances on our U.S. and certain foreign deferred tax assets because it is more-likely-than-not those deferred tax assets will not be realized. It is reasonably possible within the next 12 months that an additional valuation allowance may be required on certain foreign deferred tax assets. For more information, see Note 9, Income Taxes , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests is the result of our consolidation of subsidiaries that we do not wholly own. Substantially all of our net income attributable to non-controlling interests in 2014 and 2013 relates to Ford's non-controlling interest in our Blue Diamond Parts ("BDP") subsidiary.
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, we recognized income from discontinued operations of $1 million and $3 million , respectively, compared to a loss of $10 million and $40 million in the respective prior year periods. The income from discontinued operations was comprised of the financial results from certain operations of the Monaco business and the WCC operations. In March 2013, we divested our interest in WCC, and in May 2013, we divested substantially all of our interest in the operations of Monaco.
In addition to the operating losses from the divested businesses, the loss incurred in the first nine months of 2013 included charges of $24 million, related to the divestiture of Monaco, partially offset by WCC recognizing a warranty recovery of $13 million from a supplier that was related to a product recall. For more information, see Note 2, Discontinued Operations and Other Divestitures , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Segment Results of Continuing Operations
We define segment profit (loss) as net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Navistar International Corporation excluding income tax benefit (expense). The following sections analyze operating results as they relate to our four segments and do not include intersegment eliminations. For additional information concerning our segments, see Note 13, Segment Reporting , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

53

North America Truck Segment
Three Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
(in millions, except % change)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
North America Truck segment sales, net
$
1,914

$
1,896

$
18

1
%
$
5,088

$
5,076

$
12

—
%
North America Truck segment loss
(12
)
(143
)
131

(92
)%
(353
)
(547
)
194

(35
)%
Segment sales
In the third quarter of 2014 , the North America Truck segment net sales increase of $18 million , or 1% , was primarily due to improved Traditional truck volumes. This increase was partially offset by lower military sales, reflecting lower demand for our military products and services. Truck chargeouts from our Traditional market were up 10% , reflecting a 24% increase of Class 8 Heavy trucks and a 6% increase in Class 6 and 7 Medium trucks, partially offset by an 18% decrease in Class 8 Severe Service trucks.
In the first nine months of 2014 , net sales were flat compared to the prior year period, reflecting higher truck sales volumes in our Traditional market and the impact of certain out-of-period adjustment recorded in the second quarter of 2013, offset by lower military sales. Truck chargeouts from our Traditional market were up 8% , reflecting a 24% increase of Class 8 Heavy trucks, partially offset by a 14% decrease in Class 8 Severe Service trucks.
As described above in the Results of Operations , in the second quarter of 2013, the segment identified and recorded out-of-period adjustments for the correction of prior-period errors, relating to certain third-party equipment financings by GE that we have accounted for as borrowings. Correcting the errors resulted in a decrease of $113 million to net sales in 2013 related to prior periods.
Segment loss
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , the North America Truck segment improved its segment loss by $131 million and $194 million , respectively, primarily driven by the recognition of a benefit related to pre-existing warranties. In the third quarter of 2014, the North America Truck segment recognized a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $32 million compared to a charge for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $47 million in the third quarter of 2013. The benefit in the third quarter of 2014 is comprised of a benefit for changes in estimate of $62 million , partially offset by a $30 million correction of prior-period errors, primarily related to pre-existing warranties.
In the first nine months of 2014, the North America Truck segment recorded charges for adjustments related to pre-existing warranties of $62 million compared to charges of $254 million in the first nine months of 2013. Included within the warranty charge in the first nine months of 2014 are out-of-period adjustments of $24 million which were identified and recorded to correct prior-period errors, primarily related to pre-existing warranties. Offsetting these charges for warranty was recognition of a warranty recovery of $27 million in the first nine months of 2013. In addition, in the first nine months of 2014, gross margin was impacted by the continued shift to a greater mix of units that incorporate SCR after-treatment systems.
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , SG&A expenses and Engineering and product development costs continued to decline. SG&A expenses and Engineering and product development costs decreased by $39 million and $112 million, respectively, compared to the comparable prior year periods. The lower SG&A expenses reflect the impact of our cost-reduction initiatives. The lower Engineering and product development costs were primarily due to project rationalization of certain engineering programs and other savings from cost-reduction initiatives, as well as a shift in spending from projects to integrate the SCR after-treatment systems with certain engine models to projects related to cost reduction and the rationalization of content in our MaxxForce 13L engine.
In the first nine months of 2014 , the segment recorded charges of $2 million , the majority of which were recognized in the first quarter of 2014, for non-conformance penalties, primarily for certain pre-engine model year 2014 13L engines sales, compared to $7 million and $29 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2013. For more information, see Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In addition, in the first nine months of 2014, the segment recorded certain one-time charges. The segment recorded asset impairment charges of $23 million , of which $19 million was the result of a triggering event related to potential sales of assets requiring assessment of impairment for certain intangible and long-lived assets, reflecting our ongoing evaluation of our portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit. In the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , the segment recognized charges of $ 17 million , resulting from the discontinuation of certain engineering programs related to products that were determined to be outside of our core operations or not performing to our expectations. Additionally, in the first nine months of 2013, the North America Truck segment recognized charges of $39 million for accelerated depreciation of certain assets, primarily related to the planned closure of our Garland Facility. For more information, see Note 3, Restructurings and Impairments , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

54

North America Parts Segment
Three Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
(in millions, except % change)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
North America Parts segment sales, net
$
621

$
596

$
25

4
%
$
1,851

$
1,918

$
(67
)
(3
)%
North America Parts segment profit
127

98

29

30
%
357

329

28

9
%
Segment sales
In the third quarter of 2014 , the North America Parts segment net sales increase of $25 million , or 4% , was primarily due to improvements in our commercial markets, partially offset by lower military sales. In the first nine months of 2014 , the North America Parts segment net sales decrease of $67 million , or 3% , was primarily due to lower military sales, partially offset by improvements in our commercial markets. The decline in military sales reflects lower sales of upgrade kits and sustainment parts, as well as the impact of the definitization of pricing on certain military contracts throughout 2013.
Segment profit
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , the North America Parts segment improved its segment profit by $29 million and $28 million , respectively, primarily driven by margin improvements in our commercial markets. The increase in the North America Parts segment profit was also due to lower intercompany "access fees" due to cost-reduction initiatives in the North America Truck segment. Access fees consist of certain engineering and product development costs, depreciation expense, and SG&A.
Global Operations Segment
Three Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
(in millions, except % change)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
Global Operations segment sales, net
$
407

$
499

$
(92
)
(18
)%
$
1,133

$
1,398

$
(265
)
(19
)%
Global Operations segment profit (loss)
(2
)
(22
)
20

(91
)%
(185
)
—

(185
)
N.M.

Segment sales
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , the Global Operations segment net sales decrease of $92 million and $265 million , or 18% and 19% , was primarily driven by a decrease of $91 million and $240 million, respectively, in our South America engine operations. The continued economic downturn in the Brazil economy has contributed to lower engine volumes of 29% and 23% in the respective comparative periods. Our South American engine operations were also impacted by the devaluation of the Brazilian Real to the U.S. Dollar of 4% and 10% for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, compared to the comparable prior year periods. Also contributing to the decrease in sales in the first nine months of 2014 is a decrease of $62 million of revenues from our export truck operations, which reflects an 18% decrease in chargeouts. The decrease in the first nine months of 2014 was partially offset by a $40 million increase in revenue from Brazil truck operations.
Segment profit (loss)
In the third quarter of 2014, the Global Operations segment loss improved by $20 million , primarily driven by improvements in our export truck operations geographic mix, lower foreign exchange losses, and lower SG&A expenses, resulting from our cost-reduction initiatives. The improvement in segment loss in the third quarter of 2014 was partially offset by a decline in South America engine volumes.
In the first nine months of 2014, the Global Operations segment loss of $185 million was primarily the result of $149 million of non-cash charges in the second quarter of 2014 for the impairment of the goodwill of our Brazilian engine reporting unit and the related trademark. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the goodwill of our Brazilian engine reporting unit and trademark for potential impairment during the second quarter of 2014. As a result, we determined that the entire $142 million balance of goodwill and $7 million of trademark were impaired. For more information, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In addition, the comparative segment loss in the first nine months of 2014 decreased by $26 million as the result of a gain recognized in 2013 related to the sale of the Company's interest in the Mahindra Joint Ventures to Mahindra in February 2013. For more information, see Note 2, Discontinued Operations and Other Divestitures , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

55

In the first nine months of 2014, the remaining decreases in segment profit of $10 million was primarily due to the decreased results in our South American engine operations reflecting lower volumes and to a lesser extent the impact of foreign currency. This decrease was partially offset by improvements in our export truck operations geographic mix, as well as lower SG&A expenses and engineering and product development costs of $9 million and $7 million, respectively, primarily due to cost-reduction initiatives and project rationalization of certain engineering programs.
Financial Services Segment
Three Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
%
Change
(in millions, except % change)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
Financial Services segment revenues, net
$
60

$
61

$
(1
)
(2
)%
$
172

$
178

$
(6
)
(3
)%
Financial Services segment profit
24

23

1

4
%
71

64

7

11
%
Segment revenues
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , the decrease of $1 million and $6 million , respectively, in the Financial Services segment net revenues was primarily driven by the continued decline in the average retail note receivables balance, partially offset by higher revenues from operating leases. The decline in the average retail note receivables balance reflects lower loan originations in the U.S., partially offset by higher loan originations in Mexico.
Segment profit
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 , the increase of $1 million and $7 million , respectively, in the Financial Services segment profit was primarily due to higher interest income from intercompany loans, partially offset by the lower net financial margin due to the decline in the average retail note receivables balance in the U.S., as well as an increase in the provision for loan losses in Mexico due to an increase in their finance receivables balance.
Supplemental Information
The following tables provide additional information on truck industry retail units, market share data, order units, backlog units, chargeout units, and engine shipments. These tables present key metrics and trends that provide quantitative measures on the performance of the North America Truck and Global Operations segments. We define our Traditional markets to include U.S. and Canada School bus and Class 6 through 8 medium and heavy trucks.
Truck Industry Retail Deliveries
The following table summarizes approximate industry retail deliveries, for our Traditional truck market, categorized by relevant class, according to Wards Communications and R.L. Polk & Co. ("Polk"):
Three Months Ended July 31,
% Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
% Change
(in units)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
Traditional Markets (U.S. and Canada)
School buses
4,800

4,000

800

20
%
13,900

12,800

1,100

9
%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks
17,900

16,300

1,600

10
%
53,100

47,500

5,600

12
%
Class 8 heavy trucks
48,900

41,700

7,200

17
%
134,100

120,500

13,600

11
%
Class 8 severe service trucks
15,300

12,200

3,100

25
%
39,500

33,700

5,800

17
%
Total Traditional markets
86,900

74,200

12,700

17
%
240,600

214,500

26,100

12
%
Combined Class 8 trucks
64,200

53,900

10,300

19
%
173,600

154,200

19,400

13
%
Navistar Traditional retail deliveries
14,100

12,600

1,500

12
%
40,700

37,700

3,000

8
%

56

Truck Retail Delivery Market Share
The following table summarizes our approximate retail delivery market share percentages for the Class 6 through 8 U.S. and Canada truck markets, based on market-wide information from Wards Communications and Polk:
Three Months Ended
July 31, 2014
April 30, 2014
January 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
July 31, 2013
Traditional Markets (U.S. and Canada)


Class 6 and 7 medium trucks
20
%
26
%
17
%
20
%
24
%
Class 8 heavy trucks
14
%
14
%
12
%
14
%
12
%
Class 8 severe service trucks
15
%
17
%
19
%
20
%
18
%
Combined Class 8 trucks
14
%
15
%
14
%
16
%
14
%
Truck Orders, net
We define orders as written commitments received from customers and dealers during the year to purchase trucks. Net orders represent new orders received during the year less cancellations of orders made during the same year. Orders do not represent guarantees of purchases by customers or dealers and are subject to cancellation. Orders may be either sold orders, which will be built for specific customers, or stock orders, which will generally be built for dealer inventory for eventual sale to customers. These orders may be placed at our assembly plants in the U.S. and Mexico for destinations anywhere in the world and include trucks, buses, and military vehicles. Historically, we have had an increase in net orders for stock inventory from our dealers at the end of the year due to a combination of demand and, from time to time, incentives to the dealers. Increases in stock orders typically translate to higher future chargeouts. The following table summarizes our approximate net orders for Traditional units:
Three Months Ended July 31,
% Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
% Change
(in units)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
Traditional Markets (U.S. and Canada)
School buses
2,100

2,300

(200
)
(9
)%
7,200

6,700

500

7
%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks
2,700

2,500

200

8
%
12,900

9,600

3,300

34
%
Class 8 heavy trucks
7,600

7,800

(200
)
(3
)%
22,400

17,900

4,500

25
%
Class 8 severe service trucks
2,000

2,600

(600
)
(23
)%
6,600

7,000

(400
)
(6
)%
Total Traditional markets
14,400

15,200

(800
)
(5
)%
49,100

41,200

7,900

19
%
Combined Class 8 trucks
9,600

10,400

(800
)
(8
)%
29,000

24,900

4,100

16
%
Truck Backlogs
We define order backlogs ("backlogs") as orders yet to be built as of the end of the period. Our backlogs do not represent guarantees of purchases by customers or dealers and are subject to cancellation. Although the backlog of unbuilt orders is one of many indicators of market demand, other factors such as changes in production rates, internal and supplier available capacity, new product introductions, and competitive pricing actions may affect point-in-time comparisons. Backlogs exclude units in inventory awaiting additional modifications or delivery to the end customer. The following table summarizes our approximate backlog for Traditional units:

57

As of July 31, 2014
(in units)
2014
2013
Change
% Change
Traditional Markets (U.S. and Canada)
School buses
2,300

1,800

500

28
%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks
5,300

1,700

3,600

212
%
Class 8 heavy trucks
12,800

8,700

4,100

47
%
Class 8 severe service trucks (A)
2,100

2,400

(300
)
(13
)%
Total Traditional markets
22,500

14,600

7,900

54
%
Combined Class 8 trucks
14,900

11,100

3,800

34
%
_____________________________
(A)
The units in 2013 have been recast to exclude militarized units.
Truck Chargeouts
We define chargeouts as trucks that have been invoiced to customers. The units held in dealer inventory represent the principal difference between retail deliveries and chargeouts. The following table summarizes our approximate worldwide chargeouts from our continuing operations:
Three Months Ended July 31,
% Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
% Change
(in units)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
Traditional Markets (U.S. and Canada)
School buses
3,100

2,700

400

15
%
7,700

7,200

500

7
%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks
3,600

3,400

200

6
%
12,200

12,000

200

2
%
Class 8 heavy trucks
7,300

5,900

1,400

24
%
18,600

15,000

3,600

24
%
Class 8 severe service trucks
2,300

2,800

(500
)
(18
)%
6,200

7,200

(1,000
)
(14
)%
Total Traditional markets
16,300

14,800

1,500

10
%
44,700

41,400

3,300

8
%
Military vehicles (A)
—

100

(100
)
(100
)%
100

800

(700
)
(88
)%
Expansion markets (B)
7,600

7,900

(300
)
(4
)%
19,800

20,500

(700
)
(3
)%
Total worldwide units (C)
23,900

22,800

1,100

5
%
64,600

62,700

1,900

3
%
Combined Class 8 trucks
9,600

8,700

900

10
%
24,800

22,200

2,600

12
%
_____________________________
(A)
All periods presented have been recast to include all militarized units.
(B)
Includes chargeouts related to Blue Diamond Truck ("BDT") of 3,100 units and 2,800 units during the three months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively, and 7,600 and 6,700 units during the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 .
(C)
Excludes: (i) RV towables of 1,500 units during the first nine months ended July 31, 2013 , respectively, which were related to the Bison Coach trailer business sold in October 2013, and (ii) 300 units and 800 units during the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 , respectively, related to Monaco and WCC, both of which have been classified as discontinued operations.
Engine Shipments
Three Months Ended July 31,
% Change
Nine Months Ended July 31,
% Change
(in units)
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
OEM sales-South America
21,400

31,000

(9,600
)
(31
)%
65,700

87,400

(21,700
)
(25
)%
Intercompany sales
9,800

14,900

(5,100
)
(34
)%
30,400

46,500

(16,100
)
(35
)%
Other OEM sales
2,900

2,600

300

12
%
8,500

6,800

1,700

25
%
Total sales
34,100

48,500

(14,400
)
(30
)%
104,600

140,700

(36,100
)
(26
)%

58

Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of
(in millions)
July 31, 2014
October 31, 2013
July 31, 2013
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents
$
547

$
755

$
425

Consolidated marketable securities
618

830

708

Consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
$
1,165

$
1,585

$
1,133

Cash Requirements
We generate cash flow from the sale of trucks, diesel engines, and parts, as well as from product financing provided to our dealers and retail customers by our Financial Services operations. It is our opinion that, in the absence of significant extraordinary cash demands, our: (i) level of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, and (ii) current and forecasted cash flow from our Manufacturing operations, Financial Services operations, and financing capacities, will provide sufficient funds to meet operating requirements, capital expenditures, equity investments, and financial obligations during the next twelve months. We also believe that collections on our outstanding receivables portfolios, as well as funds available from various funding sources, will permit our Financial Services operations to meet the financing requirements of our dealers.
Our Manufacturing operations are generally able to access sufficient sources of financing to support our business plan. In August 2012, NIC and Navistar, Inc. signed a definitive credit agreement relating to our Term Loan Credit Facility, and borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $1 billion under the Term Loan Credit Facility. In conjunction with the Term Loan Credit Facility transaction, we used a portion of the proceeds from the Term Loan Credit Facility to repay all of the borrowings under Navistar, Inc.'s existing Asset-Based Credit Facility and Navistar, Inc. entered into an Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility with a commitment amount of up to $175 million. During the second quarter of 2013, we amended our Term Loan Credit Facility whereby we lowered our interest rate and extended the maturity date to August 17, 2017. We also utilized proceeds from the March 2013 issuance of $300 million of additional 8.25% Senior Notes due 2021 to make a principal repayment of $300 million against our Term Loan Credit Facility. In July 2014, the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was amended to remove used truck inventory from the borrowing base. The amendment had no impact on the aggregate commitment level under the Asset-Based Credit Facility, which remains at $175 million. Additionally, the calculation of availability was revised to include cash collateral posted to support outstanding designated letters of credit, subject to a $40 million cap, and the cash management provisions were amended to reflect intercreditor arrangements with respect to a proposed financing with NFC secured by a first priority lien on used truck inventory (and certain related assets). During the third quarter of 2014, NFC made a secured intercompany loan to our Manufacturing operations under this arrangement for $90 million.
In October 2013, we completed the private sale of $200 million of 2018 Convertible Notes, from which the Company received proceeds of $196 million, net of issuance costs and issuance discount. Also in October 2013, our Financial Services operations made an intercompany loan of $270 million to our Manufacturing operations, utilizing existing credit facilities (the "Intercompany Loan"). The Company expects to use the proceeds from the 2018 Convertible Notes for general corporate purposes, which, together with the Intercompany Loan, may include the repayment of the balance of the 2014 Convertible Notes.
During the second quarter of 2014, the Company completed the private sale of $411 million of our 2019 Convertible Notes, including a portion of the underwriters over-allotment options. The Company used the net proceeds from our 2019 Convertible Notes, as well as cash on-hand, to repurchase $404 million of notional amount of our 2014 Convertible Notes. In conjunction with the repurchases, the Company unwound a portion of the call options and warrants associated with the repurchased 2014 Convertible Notes.
In October 2012, the Company completed a public offering of NIC common stock and received proceeds of $192 million , net of underwriting discounts, commissions, and offering expenses. In connection with the public offering, in November 2012, the underwriters elected to exercise a portion of an over-allotment option, through which the Company received additional net proceeds of $14 million in the first quarter of 2013.
Consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities was $1.17 billion at July 31, 2014 , which includes $48 million of cash and cash equivalents attributable to BDT and BDP, as well as an immaterial amount of cash and cash equivalents of certain VIEs that is generally not available to satisfy our obligations. For additional information on the consolidation of BDT and BDP, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

59

Cash Flow Overview
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions)
Manufacturing
Operations
Financial Services Operations and Adjustments
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Net cash used in operating activities
$
(264
)
$
(80
)
$
(344
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
132

(118
)
14

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(71
)
205

134

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(7
)
(5
)
(12
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(210
)
2

(208
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
727

28

755

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
517

$
30

$
547


Nine Months Ended July 31, 2013
(in millions)
Manufacturing
Operations

Financial Services Operations and Adjustments

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(248
)

$
282


$
34

Net cash used in investing activities
(585
)

(106
)

(691
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
208


(194
)

14

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(21
)

2


(19
)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(646
)

(16
)

(662
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
1,059


28


1,087

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
$
413


$
12


$
425

_____________________
Manufacturing operations cash flows and Financial Services operations cash flows are not in accordance with, or an alternative for, GAAP. This non-GAAP financial information should be considered supplemental to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, we believe that non-GAAP reporting, giving effect to the adjustments shown in the reconciliation above, provides meaningful information and therefore we use it to supplement our U.S. GAAP reporting by identifying items that may not be related to the core manufacturing business. Management often uses this information to assess and measure the performance and liquidity of our operating segments. Our Manufacturing operations, for this purpose, include our North America Truck segment, Global Operations segment, North America Parts segment, and Corporate items which include certain eliminations. The reconciling differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and our U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements in Item 1, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data , are our Financial Services operations and adjustments required to eliminate certain intercompany transactions between Manufacturing operations and Financial Services operations. Our Financial Services operations cash flows are presented consistent with their treatment in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and may not be consistent with how they would be treated on a stand-alone basis. We have chosen to provide this supplemental information to allow additional analysis of operating results, to illustrate the respective cash flows giving effect to the non-GAAP adjustments shown in the above reconciliation and to provide an additional measure of performance and liquidity.
Manufacturing Operations
Manufacturing Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $264 million and $248 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively. The net increase in cash used in the first nine months of 2014, versus the comparable period in 2013, was primarily attributable to changes in inventory, including increases in our used truck inventory and changes in other current liabilities partially offset by higher income, an increase in dividends received from our Financial Services operations, higher reversal of non-cash impairment charges, changes in noncurrent assets and changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable.
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, was $166 million and $165 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively.
Manufacturing Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities was $132 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , compared to cash used of $585 million in the same period of 2013. The net increase in cash provided in the first nine months of 2014 was primarily attributable to higher sales and maturities of marketable securities, lower capital expenditures and lower purchases of equipment leased to others partially offset by higher purchases of marketable securities.
As described above in the Results of Operations , certain prior-period errors were identified and recorded in the second quarter of 2013. As a result of correcting these errors, purchases of equipment leased to others increased in the second quarter of 2013. The adjustment was related to certain third-party equipment financings by GE, which we have accounted for as borrowings.

60

The initial transactions do not qualify for revenue recognition as we retain substantial risks of ownership in the leased property. As a result, the proceeds from the transfer are recorded as an obligation and amortized to revenue over the term of the financing. In the second quarter of 2013, the Company recorded out-of-period adjustments for the correction of prior-period errors, which included recognizing Purchases of equipment leased to others of $184 million related to periods prior to fiscal 2013.
During the nine months ended July 31, 2014, sales of marketable securities totaled $ 1,092 million and maturities of marketable securities totaled $ 330 million , compared with $ 664 million of sales and $ 164 million of maturities of marketable securities during the same period of 2013.
Manufacturing Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $71 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , compared with $208 million provided by financing activities in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 . The net decrease in cash flow from financing activities was primarily attributable to lower proceeds from finance lease obligations, higher principal payments on long-term debt and lower issuance of common stock partially offset by higher proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and lower principal payments under capital lease obligations.
Financial Services Operations
Financial Services and Adjustments Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $80 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $282 million in the same period of 2013 . The net decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to the decline in liquidations of U.S. retail notes receivable, an increase in the level of accounts receivable purchased from the manufacturing operations, and a secured intercompany loan to the manufacturing operations in 2014.

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, was $41 million in each of the nine month periods ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. A decrease in average finance receivables funding requirements was largely offset by the funding of the Intercompany Loan. Average interest rates remained constant.
Financial Services and Adjustments Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $118 million and $106 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 , respectively. Changes in restricted cash levels required under our secured borrowings were the primary uses of cash from investing activities in 2014 and 2013, along with investments in equipment leased to others. In 2014, additional restricted cash was used to secure new borrowings relating to our Mexican financial services operation and our retail accounts funding facility.
Financial Services and Adjustments Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $205 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , compared to cash used of $194 million in the same period of 2013 . New funding requirements have exceeded periodic payments on our funding facilities during 2014 as overall finance receivables levels increased. Also, there were funding requirements for a dividend and the secured intercompany loan to the manufacturing operations in 2014. In 2013, cash used in financing activities was due to periodic payments on our funding facilities exceeding new funding requirements.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company’s pension plans are funded by contributions made from Company assets in accordance with applicable U.S. and Canadian government regulations. The regulatory funding requirements are computed using an actuarially determined funded status, which is determined using assumptions that often differ from assumptions used to measure the funded status for U.S. GAAP. U.S. funding targets are determined by rules promulgated under the Pension Protection Act ("PPA"). The PPA additionally requires underfunded plans to achieve 100% funding over a period of time. From time to time, we have discussions with and receive requests for certain information from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC"). The PBGC was created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to encourage the continuation and maintenance of private-sector defined benefit pension plans, provide timely and uninterrupted payment of pension benefits, and keep pension insurance premiums at a minimum. In July 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act was signed into law, impacting the minimum funding requirements for pension plans, but does not otherwise impact our accounting for pension benefits. In August 2014, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014, including extension of pension funding interest rate relief, was signed into law. As a result, we lowered our funding expectations.
Generally, our pension plans are funded by contributions made by us. Our policy is to fund the pension plans in accordance with applicable U.S. and Canadian government regulations and to make additional contributions from time to time.

61

For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014 , we contributed $33 million and $98 million , respectively, and for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 we contributed $29 million and $86 million , respectively, to our U.S. and Canadian pension plans (the "Plans") to meet regulatory minimum funding requirements. We currently anticipate additional contributions of approximately $66 million during the remainder of 2014. Future contributions are dependent upon a number of factors, principally the changes in values of plan assets, changes in interest rates, the impact of any future funding relief, and the impact of funding resulting from the closure of our Chatham plant. We currently expect that from 2015 through 2017, the Company will be required to contribute at least $100 million per year to the plans, depending on asset performance and discount rates.
For more information, see Note 8, Postretirement Benefits , to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Other Information
Impact of Environmental Regulation
Government regulation related to climate change is under consideration at the U.S. federal and state levels. Because our products use fossil fuels, they may be impacted indirectly due to regulation, such as a cap and trade program, affecting the cost of fuels. The EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued final rules for greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy on September 15, 2011. These begin to apply in calendar year 2014 and will be fully implemented in model year 2017. The agencies' stated goals for these rules were to increase the use of currently existing technologies. The Company plans to comply with these rules through use of existing technologies and implementation of emerging technologies as they become available. Several of the Company's vehicles have been certified early for the 2013 model year with the remaining vehicles and all engines required to be certified in 2014. The next phase of federal greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy regulations, anticipated for 2020, is also under discussion among the relevant agencies, manufacturers, including the Company, and other stakeholders. Canada adopted its version of fuel economy and/or greenhouse gas emission regulations in February 2013. These regulations are substantially aligned with U.S. fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission regulations. California is also in the initial stages of considering greenhouse gas emission rules for heavy duty vehicles. We expect that heavy duty vehicle and engine fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions rules will be under consideration in other global jurisdictions in the future. These standards will impact development and production costs for vehicles and engines. There will also be administrative costs arising from the implementation of the rules.
Our facilities may be subject to regulation related to climate change and climate change itself may also have some impact on the Company's operations. However, these impacts are currently uncertain and the Company cannot predict the nature and scope of those impacts.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we use estimates and make judgments and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and the related disclosures. Our assumptions, estimates, and judgments are based on historical experience, current trends, and other factors we believe are relevant at the time we prepare our consolidated financial statements.
Our significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates are consistent with those discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , to the consolidated financial statements and the MD&A section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 . During the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , there were no significant changes in our application of our critical accounting policies.
To aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reporting results, we have identified the following accounting policies as our most critical because they require us to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments.
•
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
•
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
•
Income Taxes
•
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
•
Goodwill
•
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
•
Contingency Accruals

62

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , the Company has not adopted any new accounting guidance that has had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.  This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. Our effective date is November 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact and method of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk , of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013. During the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , there have been no significant changes in our exposure to market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As previously disclosed under “Item 9A-Controls and Procedures” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of October 31, 2013 based on two material weaknesses identified. In the second quarter ended April 30, 2014, management had sufficient evidence to conclude that remediation was complete for the income tax expense material weakness previously reported. Based on the one remaining material weakness that still exists, which we continue to work to remediate and view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the quarter ended July 31, 2014 , our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. In light of the weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, prior to filing our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, and prior to filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we completed substantive procedures, including, validating, and in certain cases correcting, the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used for warranty costs estimates and other significant accounting estimates and transactions. The substantive procedures have allowed us to conclude that, notwithstanding the material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting described below, the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP.
The material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which is described more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, that existed as of October 31, 2013 and continued to exist as of July 31, 2014 , is as follows:
•
We did not have sufficient controls designed to validate the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the determination of significant estimates and accounting transactions. Specifically, controls were not designed to identify errors in the underlying data which was used to calculate warranty cost estimates and other significant accounting estimates and the accounting effects of significant transactions.
Management’s Remediation Initiatives
We continue to make progress toward achieving the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Remediation generally requires making changes to how controls are designed and then adhering to those changes for a sufficient period of time such that the effectiveness of those changes is demonstrated with an appropriate amount of consistency. We have assigned owners, who are responsible for implementing and monitoring our short-term and long-term remediation plans, as well as

63

executive owners to oversee the necessary remedial changes to the overall design of our internal control environment and to address the root causes of the material weakness.
Our initiatives, summarized below, are intended to remediate our remaining material weakness and to continue to enhance our internal control over financial reporting.
•
We are designing, documenting, and testing controls that are intended to validate the completeness and accuracy of the data used for warranty costs estimates and other significant accounting estimates and transactions.
We have made significant progress in our remediation efforts including strengthening key management review controls, enhancing controls over system interfaces, and testing reports and underlying data used in significant accounting estimates and transactions. Although more time is needed to demonstrate effectiveness, the efforts summarized above continue to enhance our internal control over financial reporting.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
For the quarter ended April 30, 2014, we completed the remediation of our material weakness related to income tax expense as previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013. To remediate the material weakness, management strengthened an existing control to mitigate the risk of improper presentation of income tax expense in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, quarterly discussions with outside tax advisors now include a more comprehensive review of business developments that could affect the determination or presentation of income tax expense.
We are taking actions to remediate the remaining material weakness related to our internal controls over financial reporting, as described above. However, our remediation efforts were not complete as of July 31, 2014 . Other than the changes disclosed above, there were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended July 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


64

PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
During the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , there have been no material developments from the legal proceedings disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, except (i) those disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2014; (ii) those disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2014; and (iii) those disclosed below:

Lis Franco de Toledo, et. al. vs. Syntex do Brasil and IIAA

In April 2014, the parties entered into a settlement agreement which was ratified by the Special Court of Appeals on April 25, 2014, the “Rio Settlement.” Pursuant to the Rio Settlement, Wyeth undertook to pay R$20 million (the equivalent of approximately US$ 9 million at July 31, 2014) to Lis Franco within 30 days from the ratification of the Rio Settlement, and Lis Franco undertook to release IIAA and Wyeth from any indemnification obligations as well as from any and all claims against IIAA regarding the subject of Lis Franco’s counterclaim. In addition, Wyeth agreed to pay the total amount of R$8.5 million (the equivalent of approximately US$3.8 million at July 31, 2014) to Lis Franco’s attorneys within 30 days from the ratification of the Rio Settlement, and Lis Franco undertook to release IIAA and Wyeth from any and all claims regarding such attorneys’ fees. The Rio Settlement became final and binding on May 27, 2014 and the matter was closed on the same date.

Separately, Wyeth filed a special appeal, addressed to the Superior Court of Appeals in Sao Paulo, in December 2013. MWM filed an answer to the appeal in January 2014. Before the Superior Court of Appeals ruled on the appeal, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, the “Sao Paulo Settlement,” subject to the approval of the Rio Settlement. Pursuant to the Sao Paulo Settlement, Wyeth undertook to (i) comply with the terms of the Rio Settlement, including payment of the agreed-upon amounts to Lis Franco and his attorneys; (ii) withdraw the appeal filed against the award granted to MWM in Sao Paulo; and (iii) pay R$0.2 million in attorneys’ fees to MWM's counsels. Once the Rio Settlement became final and binding, the Sao Paulo Settlement was submitted for ratification on April 30, 2014. At the same time, Wyeth withdrew its appeal and both parties waived the right to appeal the future ratification of the Sao Paulo Settlement. In May 2014, the Sao Paulo State Court of Appeals ratified Wyeth’s appeal withdrawal in a final and binding decision and the matter was closed on the same date.

Westbrook vs. Navistar. et. al.

On June 11, 2014, the Fifth Circuit denied the Trustee's petition for rehearing. On June 19, 2014, the Fifth Circuit issued its mandate affirming the judgment of the District Court.

Shareholder Litigation

In the "10b-5 Cases” (as defined under Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, above), on July 22, 2014, the Court granted the defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, denied the lead plaintiff’s Motion to Strike as moot, and gave the lead plaintiff leave to file a second consolidated amended complaint by August 22, 2014. On August 22, 2014, the plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint, which narrows the claims in two ways. First, the plaintiff abandoned its claims against the majority of the defendants. The plaintiff now brings claims against only Navistar, Dan Ustian, A.J. Cederoth, Jack Allen, and Eric Tech. The plaintiff also shortened the putative class period. In the prior complaint, the class period began on June 9, 2009. In the Second Amended Complaint, it begins on March 10, 2010. Defendants expect to file their Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on September 23, 2014.  The Court has ordered a briefing schedule and set a ruling date for February 17, 2015.

In respect of the James Gould derivative complaint, on July 31, 2014, the parties filed a status report informing the court that defendants’ motion to dismiss the 10b-5 case had been granted and stating that a proposed scheduling order or further stay order would be filed on or before September 2, 2014. Pursuant to a court order on August 27, 2014, this matter has been stayed pending a ruling on the anticipated motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 cases.

In respect of the Abbie Griffin derivative complaint, on August 5, 2014, the parties filed a status report with the court requesting that the August 2013 stay order remain in place pending a ruling on the anticipated motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 cases.

MaxxForce Engine EGR Warranty Litigation

On June 24, 2014, N&C Transportation Ltd. filed a putative class action lawsuit against Navistar International Corporation, Navistar, Inc., Navistar Canada Inc., and Harbour International Trucks in Canada in the Supreme Court of British Columbia

65

(the “N&C Action”).   The N&C Action seeks to certify a class of persons in British Columbia who purchased heavy duty Class 8 trucks equipped with Navistar EGR engines. N&C alleges that vehicles with engines using EGR technology had pervasive quality issues and defects, and that the defendants knew of such engine problems but failed to disclose them to consumers and failed to cure the defects. N&C asserts claims based on theories of breach of contract, misrepresentation, unfair competition, and negligence. For relief, the N&C Action seeks monetary damages and an order rescinding purchase agreements for the trucks in question. The N&C Action also seeks special and punitive damages, interest, and costs. The Company has not yet been served in the N&C Action.

On July 7, 2014, Par 4 Transport, LLC filed a putative class action lawsuit against Navistar, Inc. in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “Par 4 Action”). The Par 4 Action seeks to certify a class of persons or entities in the United States who purchased or leased a ProStar vehicle between 2010 and 2013 equipped with a MaxxForce 13-liter diesel engine.  Par 4 alleges that the MaxxForce Advanced EGR engines are defective and that Navistar, Inc. failed to disclose and correct the defect. Par 4 asserts claims against Navistar, Inc. based on theories of breach of warranty, consumer fraud, and declaratory relief. For relief, the Par 4 Action seeks monetary damages, declaratory relief, interest, fees, and costs.

After the Par 4 Action was filed, two additional putative class action lawsuits were filed in July in the same District Court. The proposed classes in the two additional lawsuits are somewhat broader in time and engine scope than the class proposed in the Par 4 Action, but the two additional lawsuits are otherwise substantially similar to the Par 4 Action.  First, on July 9, 2014, Denis Gray Trucking, Inc., Carmichael Leasing Co., Inc. d/b/a Carmichael Nationalease, and GTL Enterprises Inc. filed a putative class action against Navistar International Corporation seeking to certify a nationwide class as described above, and also seeking to certify state-wide subclasses in Illinois, California, and Washington. Second, on July 30, 2014, B&T Express, Inc., OMCO Enterprises, LLC, ALJEN Enterprises, LLC, A.T.T. Trucking, LLC, H.J. O'Malley Trucking, LLC, and Traficanti Trucking, LLC filed a putative class action against Navistar International Corporation seeking to certify a nationwide class as described above, and also seeking to certify a state-wide subclass in Ohio.

All three of these MaxxForce Engine putative class action lawsuits have been assigned to the same judge and are pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.  Navistar’s deadline to respond or otherwise plead to all three lawsuits is September 10, 2014.

EPA Notice of Violation

In February 2012, Navistar, Inc. received a Notice of Violation ("NOV") from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"). The NOV states that the EPA reserves the right to file an administrative complaint or to refer this matter to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) with a recommendation that a civil complaint be filed in federal district court. In July 2014, the DOJ informed Navistar that the matter had been referred to DOJ.





66



67

Item 1A.
Risk Factors
During the nine months ended July 31, 2014 , except as set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our year ended October 31, 2013:

Our ability to use net operating loss (“NOL”) carryovers to reduce future tax payments could be negatively impacted if there is a change in our ownership or a failure to generate sufficient taxable income.

As of October 31, 2013 , we had $1.7 billion of NOL carryforwards with which to offset our future taxable income for U.S. federal income tax reporting purposes. Presently, there is no annual limitation on our ability to use U.S. federal NOLs to reduce future income taxes. However, we may be subject to substantial annual limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) if an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Code, occurs with respect to our capital stock. Generally, an ownership change occurs if certain persons or groups increase their aggregate ownership by more than 50 percentage points of our total capital stock in a three-year period. If an ownership change occurs, our ability to use domestic NOLs to reduce taxable income is generally limited to an annual amount based on 1) the fair market value of our stock immediately prior to the ownership change multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt interest rate plus 2) built-in gains on certain assets held prior to the ownership change. Although NOLs that exceed the Section 382 limitation in any year continue to be allowed as carry forwards for the remainder of the 20-year carry forward period and can be used to offset taxable income for years within the carryover period subject to the limitation in each year, the use of the remaining NOLs for the loss year will be prohibited if the carryover period for any loss year expires. If we should fail to generate a sufficient level of taxable income prior to the expiration of the NOL carry forward periods, then we will lose the ability to apply the NOLs as offsets to future taxable income.

Because we may use our NOL carryforwards to offset our future taxable income for federal income tax reporting purposes, we believe these NOL carryforwards are a substantial asset for us. Accordingly, on June 23, 2014, we and Computershare Inc. (the “Rights Agent”), entered into Amendment No. 7 to the Rights Agreement, dated June 19, 2012, as amended (the “Rights Agreement”) in an effort to protect our NOLs during the effective period of the Amendment, and on August 29, 2014, we and the Rights Agent entered into Amendment No. 8 to the Rights Agreement further extending the Rights Agreement, and its intended protection of our NOLs, through November 3, 2014. See Note 14, Stockholders’ Deficit. Although the Rights Agreement, as amended, is intended to reduce the likelihood of an ownership change that could adversely affect us, we cannot provide assurance that the restrictions on transferability in the Rights Agreement will prevent all transfers that could result in such an ownership change.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Item 3.
Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information
None.

68

Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit:
Description
Page
(4)
E-1
(10)
E-2
(31.1)
E-3
(31.2)
E-4
(32.1)
E-5
(32.2)
E-6
(99.1)
E-7
(101.INS)
XBRL Instance Document
N/A
(101.SCH)
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
N/A
(101.CAL)
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
N/A
(101.LAB)
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
N/A
(101.PRE)
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
N/A
(101.DEF)
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
N/A
All exhibits other than those indicated above are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the information called for is shown in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2014 .


SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)
/s/    S AMARA A. S TRYCKER
Samara A. Strycker
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
September 3, 2014


70
TABLE OF CONTENTS