NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
[ x ]
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
|
|
Commission File Number 001-10822
National Health Investors, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Maryland
|
62-1470956
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
222 Robert Rose Drive, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
|
37129
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
(615) 890-9100
|
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each Class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ x ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [ x ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ x ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes [ x ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§292.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [ x ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer [ x ]
|
Accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
|
Smaller reporting company [ ]
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ x ]
The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates on
June 30, 2016
(based on the closing price of these shares on the New York Stock Exchange) was approximately
$2,819,841,000
. There were
39,847,860
shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of
February 14, 2017
.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2017 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of this Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
|
Page
|
|
2
Forward Looking Statements
References throughout this document to NHI or the Company include National Health Investors, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries. In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “Plain English” guidelines, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been written in the first person. In this document, the words “we”, “our”, “ours” and “us” refer only to National Health Investors, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and not any other person. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references herein to “the Company” include all of our consolidated subsidiaries.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other materials we have filed or may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as information included in oral statements made, or to be made, by our senior management contain certain “forward-looking” statements as that term is defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements regarding our expected future financial position, results of operations, cash flows, funds from operations, continued performance improvements, ability to service and refinance our debt obligations, ability to finance growth opportunities, and similar statements including, without limitation, those containing words such as “may”, “will”, “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “estimates”, “plans”, and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from those projected or contemplated in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among other things, the following risks described in more detail under the heading “Risk Factors” under Item 1A:
|
*
|
We depend on the operating success of our tenants and borrowers for collection of our lease and note payments;
|
|
*
|
We depend on the success of property development and construction activities, which may fail to achieve the operating results we expect;
|
|
*
|
We are exposed to the risk that our tenants and borrowers may become subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings;
|
|
*
|
We are exposed to risks related to governmental regulations and payors, principally Medicare and Medicaid, and the effect that lower reimbursement rates would have on our tenants’ and borrowers’ business;
|
|
*
|
We are exposed to the risk that the cash flows of our tenants and borrowers would be adversely affected by increased liability claims and liability insurance costs;
|
|
*
|
We are exposed to risks related to environmental laws and the costs associated with liabilities related to hazardous substances;
|
|
*
|
We are exposed to the risk that we may not be fully indemnified by our lessees and borrowers against future litigation;
|
|
*
|
We depend on the success of our future acquisitions and investments;
|
|
*
|
We depend on our ability to reinvest cash in real estate investments in a timely manner and on acceptable terms;
|
|
*
|
We may need to refinance existing debt or incur additional debt in the future, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us;
|
|
*
|
We have covenants related to our indebtedness which impose certain operational limitations and a breach of those covenants could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations;
|
|
*
|
We are exposed to the risk that the illiquidity of real estate investments could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties;
|
|
*
|
Certain tenants in our portfolio account for a significant percentage of the rent we expect to generate from our portfolio, and the failure of any of these tenants to meet their obligations to us could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
|
|
*
|
We depend on revenues derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets, while a portion of our debt capital used to finance those investments bear interest at variable rates. This circumstance creates interest rate risk to the Company;
|
3
|
*
|
We are exposed to the risk that our assets may be subject to impairment charges;
|
|
*
|
We depend on the ability to continue to qualify for taxation as a real estate investment trust;
|
|
*
|
We have ownership limits in our charter with respect to our common stock and other classes of capital stock which may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders;
|
|
*
|
We are subject to certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and bylaws that could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control transaction, even if the transaction involves a premium price for our common stock or our stockholders believe such transaction to be otherwise in their best interests.
|
See the notes to the annual audited consolidated financial statements, and “Business” and “Risk Factors” under Item 1 and Item 1A therein for a further discussion of these and of various governmental regulations and other operating factors relating to the healthcare industry and the risk factors inherent in them. You should carefully consider these risks before making any investment decisions in the Company. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones we face. There may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently deem immaterial. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our shares of stock could decline and you may lose part or all of your investment. Given these risks and uncertainties, we can give no assurance that these forward-looking statements will, in fact, occur and, therefore, caution investors not to place undue reliance on them.
General
National Health Investors, Inc., established in 1991 as a Maryland corporation, is a self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in sale-leaseback, joint-venture, mortgage and mezzanine financing of need-driven and discretionary senior housing and medical investments. Our portfolio consists of lease, mortgage and other note investments in independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities, senior living campuses, skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and medical office buildings. Other investments have included marketable securities and a joint venture structured to comply with the provisions of the REIT Investment Diversification Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”) through which we invested in facility operations managed by an independent third-party. We fund our real estate investments primarily through: (1) operating cash flow, (2) debt offerings, including bank lines of credit and term debt, both unsecured and secured, and (3) the sale of equity securities.
At
December 31, 2016
, we had investments in real estate, mortgage and other notes receivable involving
205
facilities located in
32
states. These investments involve
129
senior housing properties,
71
skilled nursing facilities,
3
hospitals,
2
medical office buildings and other notes receivable. These investments (excluding our corporate office of
$1,175,000
) consisted of properties with an original cost of
$2,471,679,000
, rented under triple-net leases to
27
lessees, and
$133,493,000
aggregate carrying value of mortgage and other notes receivable due from
11
borrowers.
Our investments in real estate and mortgage loans are secured by real estate located within the United States. We are managed as one reporting unit, rather than multiple reporting units, for internal reporting purposes and for internal decision making. Therefore, we have concluded that we operate as a single segment. Information about revenues from our tenants and borrowers, our net income, cash flows and balance sheet can be found in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Classification of Properties in our Portfolio
Senior Housing
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
125
senior housing properties (“SHO”) leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by
4
SHOs. The SHOs in our portfolio are either need-driven or discretionary for end users and consist of independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities and senior living campuses which are more fully described below.
Need-Driven Senior Housing
Assisted Living Facilities.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
76
assisted living facilities (“ALF”) leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by
3
ALFs. ALFs are free-standing facilities that provide basic room and board functions for elderly residents. As residents typically receive assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, grooming, administering medication and memory care services, we consider these facilities to be need-driven senior
4
housing. On-site staff personnel are available to assist in minor medical needs on an as-needed basis. Operators of ALFs are typically paid from private sources without assistance from government. ALFs may be licensed and regulated in some states, but do not always require the issuance of a Certificate of Need (“CON”) as required for skilled nursing facilities.
Senior Living Campuses.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
10
senior living campuses (“SLC”) leased to operators. SLCs contain one or more buildings that include skilled nursing beds combined with an independent or assisted living facility that provides basic room and board functions for elderly residents. They may also provide assistance to residents with activities of daily living such as bathing, grooming and administering medication. On-site staff personnel are available to assist in minor medical needs on an as-needed basis. As the decision to transition to a senior living campus is typically more than a lifestyle choice and is usually driven by the need to receive some moderate level of care, we consider this facility type to be need-driven. Operators of SLCs are typically paid from private sources and from government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid for skilled nursing residents.
Discretionary Senior Housing
Independent Living Facilities.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
29
independent living facilities (“ILF”) leased to operators. ILFs offer specially designed residential units for active senior adults and provide various ancillary services for their residents including restaurants, activity rooms and social areas. Services provided by ILF operators are generally paid from private sources without assistance from government payors. ILFs may be licensed and regulated in some states, but do not require the issuance of a CON as required for skilled nursing facilities. As ILFs typically do not provide assistance with activities of daily living, we consider the decision to transition to an ILF facility to be discretionary.
Entrance-Fee Communities.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
10
entrance-fee communities (“EFC”) leased to operators and a mortgage loan secured by 1 EFC. Entrance-fee communities, frequently referred to as continuing care retirement communities, or CCRCs, typically include a combination of detached cottages, an independent living facility, an assisted living facility and a skilled nursing facility on one campus. These communities appeal to residents because there is no need to relocate when health and medical needs change. EFCs are classified as either Type A, B, or C depending upon the amount of healthcare benefits included in the entrance fee. “Type A” EFCs, or “Lifecare” communities, include substantially all future healthcare costs. Communities providing a modified healthcare contract offering access to skilled nursing care but only paying for a maximum number of days are referred to as “Type B” EFCs. Finally, “Type C” EFCs, the type in our portfolio, are fee-for-service communities which do not provide any healthcare benefits and correspondingly have the lowest entrance fees. However, monthly fees may be higher to reflect the current healthcare components delivered to each resident. EFC licensure is state-specific, but generally the skilled nursing beds included in our EFC portfolio are subject to state licensure and regulation. As the decision to transition to an EFC is typically made as a lifestyle choice and not as the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider the decision to transition to an EFC to be discretionary. Similarly, the predominant source of revenue for operators of EFCs is from private payor sources.
Medical
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
72
medical facilities leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by
4
medical facilities. The medical facilities within our portfolio consist of skilled nursing facilities, hospitals and medical office buildings, which are more fully described below.
Skilled Nursing Facilities.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
67
skilled nursing facilities (“SNF”) leased to operators and mortgage loans secured by
4
SNFs. SNFs provide some combination of skilled and intermediate nursing and rehabilitative care, including speech, physical and occupational therapy. As the decision to utilize the services of a SNF is typically made as the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider this to be a need driven medical facility. The operators of the SNFs receive payment from a combination of private pay sources and government payors such as Medicaid and Medicare. SNFs are required to obtain state licenses and are highly regulated at the federal, state and local level. Most SNFs must obtain a CON from the state before opening or expanding such facilities. Some SNFs also include assisted living beds.
Hospitals.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
3
hospitals (“HOSP”) leased to operators. Hospitals provide a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services, including acute psychiatric and rehabilitation services, and are subject to extensive federal, state and local legislation and regulation. Hospitals undergo periodic inspections regarding standards of medical care, equipment and hygiene as a condition of licensure. Services provided by hospitals are generally paid for by a combination of private pay sources and government payors. As the decision to utilize the services of a hospital is typically made as the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider this to be a need driven medical facility.
5
Medical Office Buildings.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our portfolio included
2
medical office buildings (“MOB”) leased to operators. MOBs are specifically configured office buildings whose tenants are primarily physicians and other medical practitioners. As the decision to utilize the services of an MOB is typically made as a the result of a pressing medical concern, we consider this to be a need driven medical facility. MOBs differ from conventional office buildings due to the special requirements of the tenants. Each of our MOBs is leased to one lessee, and is either physically attached to or located on an acute care hospital campus. The lessee sub-leases individual office space to the physicians or other medical practitioners. The lessee is responsible to us for the lease obligations of the entire building, regardless of their ability to sub-lease the individual office space.
Nature of Investments
Our investments are typically structured as acquisitions of properties through purchase-leaseback transactions, acquisitions of properties from other real estate investors, loans or in operations through structures allowed by RIDEA. We have provided construction loans for facilities for which we were already committed to provide long-term financing or for which the operator agreed to enter into a purchase option and lease with us upon completion of construction or after the facility is stabilized. The annual lease rates on our leases and the annual interest rates on our mortgage, construction and mezzanine loans ranged between 6.75% and 10% during
2016
. We believe our lease and loan terms are competitive within our peer group. Typical characteristics of these transactions are as follows:
Leases.
Our leases generally have an initial leasehold term of 10 to 15 years with one or more 5-year tenant renewal options. The leases are “triple net leases” under which the tenant is responsible for the payment of all taxes, utilities, insurance premium costs, repairs and other charges relating to the operation of the properties, including required levels of capital expenditures each year. The tenant is obligated at its expense to keep all improvements, fixtures and other components of the properties covered by “all risk” insurance in an amount equal to at least the full replacement cost thereof, and to maintain specified minimal personal injury and property damage insurance, protecting us as well as the tenant. The leases also require the tenant to indemnify and hold us harmless from all claims resulting from the use, occupancy and related activities of each property by the tenant, and to indemnify us against all costs related to any release, discovery, clean-up and removal of hazardous substances or materials, or other environmental responsibility with respect to each facility.
Most of our existing leases contain annual escalators in rent payments. For financial statement purposes, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease where the lease contains fixed escalators. Certain of our operators hold purchase options allowing them to acquire properties they currently lease from NHI. When present, tenant purchase options generally give the lessee an option to purchase the underlying property for consideration determined by i) a sliding base dependent upon the extent of appreciation in the property plus a specified proportion of any appreciation; ii) our acquisition costs plus a specified proportion of any appreciation; iii) an agreed capitalization rate applied to the current rental; or iv) our acquisition costs plus a profit floor plus a specified proportion of any appreciation. Where stipulated above, appreciation is to be established by independent appraisal.
Some of the obligations under the leases are guaranteed by the parent corporation of the lessee, if any, or affiliates or individual principals of the lessee. In some leases, the third party operator will also guarantee some portion of the lease obligations. Some obligations are backed further by other collateral such as security deposits, machinery, equipment, furnishings and other personal property.
We monitor our triple-net lessee tenant credit quality and identify any material changes by performing the following activities:
|
•
|
Obtaining financial statements on a monthly, quarterly and/or annual basis to assess the operational trends of our tenants and the financial position and capability of those tenants
|
|
•
|
Calculating the operating cash flow for each of our tenants
|
|
•
|
Calculating the lease service coverage ratio and other ratios pertinent to our tenants
|
|
•
|
Obtaining property-level occupancy rates for our tenants
|
|
•
|
Verifying the payment of taxes by our tenants
|
|
•
|
Obtaining certificates of insurance for each tenant
|
|
•
|
Obtaining financial statements of our lessee guarantors on an annual basis
|
|
•
|
Conducting a periodic inspection of our properties to ascertain proper maintenance, repair and upkeep
|
|
•
|
Monitoring those tenants with indications of continuing and material deteriorating credit quality through discussions with our executive management and Board of Directors
|
RIDEA Transactions.
Our arrangement with an affiliate of Bickford Senior Living (“Bickford”) was structured to be compliant with the provisions of RIDEA which permitted NHI to receive rent payments through a triple-net lease between a property company
6
and an operating company and gave NHI the opportunity to capture additional value on the improving performance of the operating company through distributions to a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”). Accordingly, the TRS held our 85% equity interest in an unconsolidated operating company, which we did not control, and provided an organizational structure that allowed the TRS to engage in a broad range of activities and share in revenues that would otherwise be non-qualifying income under the REIT gross income tests. The TRS is subject to state and federal income taxes. Our RIDEA arrangement was terminated on September 30, 2016.
Mortgage loans.
We have first mortgage loans with maturities of at least 5 years from inception with varying amortization schedules from interest only to fully amortizing. Most of the loans are at a fixed interest rate; however, some interest rates increase based on a fixed schedule. In most cases, the owner of the facility is committed to make minimum annual capital expenditures for the purpose of maintaining or upgrading their respective facility. Additionally, most of our loans are collateralized by first mortgage liens and corporate or personal guarantees. Currently, our first mortgage loans carry interest rates which range from 6.75% to 8.25%.
We have made mortgage loans to borrowers secured by a second deed-of-trust where there is a process in place for the borrower to obtain long-term financing, primarily with a U.S. government agency, and where the historical financial performance of the underlying facility meets our loan underwriting criteria.
Mezzanine loans.
Frequently in situations calling for temporary financing or when our borrowers’ in-place lending arrangements prohibit the extension of first mortgage security, we typically accept a second mortgage position or extend credit based on corporate and/or personal guarantees. These mezzanine loans often combine with an NHI purchase option covering the subject property. Our mezzanine loans carry interest rates which range from 8.25% to 10.00%.
Construction loans.
From time to time, we also provide construction loans that convert to mortgage loans upon the completion of the construction of the facility. We may also obtain a purchase option to acquire the facility at a future date and lease the facility back to the operator. During the term of the construction loan, funds are usually advanced pursuant to draw requests made by the borrower in accordance with the terms and conditions of the loan. Interest is typically assessed on these loans at rates equivalent to the eventual mortgage rate upon conversion. In addition to the security of the lien against the property, we will generally require additional security and collateral in the form of either payment and performance completion bonds or completion guarantees by the borrower’s parent, affiliates of the borrower or one or more of the individuals who control the borrower. We currently have 3 construction loans with interest rates which range from 8% to 10%.
Other notes receivable.
We have provided a revolving credit facility to a borrower whose business is to provide bridge loans to owner-operators who are qualifying for long-term HUD financing secured by real estate. Our interest rate on the credit facility is 10.0%. We have provided loans to borrowers involved in the skilled nursing and senior housing industries who have pledged personal and business guarantees as security for the loans. The interest rates on these loans currently range from 8% to10.0%.
Investment in marketable securities.
We have invested a portion of our funds in various marketable securities with quoted market prices, including the common shares of other publicly-held REITs. We classify these highly-liquid securities as available-for-sale and carry the investments at their then quoted fair market value at the balance sheet date. We may choose to liquidate these investments to invest the proceeds into real estate assets. We currently have investments in marketable securities with a fair market value of
$11,745,000
.
7
Competition and Market Conditions
We compete with other REITs, private equity funds, banks and insurance companies in the acquisition, leasing and financing of health care real estate.
Operators of our facilities compete on a local and regional basis with operators of facilities that provide comparable services. Operators compete for residents and/or patients and staff based on quality of care, reputation, physical appearance of facilities, services offered, family preference, physicians, staff and price. Competition is with other operators as well as companies managing multiple facilities, some of which are substantially larger and have greater resources than the operators of our facilities. Some of these facilities are operated for profit while others are owned by governmental agencies or tax exempt not-for-profit entities.
The SNFs which either secure our mortgage loans or we lease to operators receive the majority of their revenues from Medicare, Medicaid and other government payors. From time to time, these facilities have experienced revenue reductions brought about by the enactment of legislation to reduce government costs. In particular, the establishment of a Medicare Prospective Payment System (“PPS”) for SNF services to replace the cost-based reimbursement system significantly reduced Medicare reimbursement to SNF providers. While Congress subsequently took steps to mitigate the impact of PPS on SNFs, other federal legislative policies have been adopted and continue to be proposed that would reduce the growth rate of Medicare and/or Medicaid payments to SNFs. State Medicaid funding is not expected to keep pace with inflation according to industry studies. Any changes in government reimbursement methodology that reduce reimbursement to levels that are insufficient to cover the operating costs of our lessees and borrowers could indirectly adversely impact us.
Our senior housing properties generally rely on private-pay residents who may be negatively impacted in an economic downturn. For example, a resident may intend to sell their home to afford the cost of living in an ILF or ALF. In addition, the success of these facilities is often impacted by the existence of comparable, competing facilities in a local market.
Operator Diversification
For the year ended
December 31, 2016
, approximately
19%
of our portfolio revenue was from publicly-owned operators,
55%
was from regional operators,
19%
from national chains which are privately owned and
7%
was from smaller operators. We consider the creditworthiness of the operator to be an important factor in underwriting the lease or loan investment, and we generally have the right to approve any changes in operators.
For the year ended
December 31, 2016
, tenants which provided more than 3% of our total revenues were (in alphabetical order): Bickford Senior Living; East Lake Capital Management; The Ensign Group; Holiday Retirement; National HealthCare Corporation; and Senior Living Communities.
Major Customers
We have four operators, an affiliate of Holiday Retirement (“Holiday”), Senior Living Communities, LLC (“Senior Living”), National HealthCare Corporation (“NHC”) and an affiliate of Bickford Senior Living (“Bickford”), from whom we individually derive at least 10% of our income.
Holiday
As of
December 31, 2016
, we leased
25
independent living facilities to an affiliate of Holiday Retirement (“Holiday”). The master lease term of
17
years began in December 2013 and provides for an escalator of
4.5%
in 2017 and a minimum of
3.5%
each year thereafter.
Of our total revenues,
$43,817,000
(
18%
),
$43,817,000
(
19%
) and
$43,817,000
(
25%
) were derived from Holiday for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, including
$8,965,000
,
$10,466,000
and
$11,902,000
in straight-line rent, respectively. Our tenant operates the facilities pursuant to a management agreement with a Holiday-affiliated manager.
Senior Living Communities
In December 2014 we acquired a portfolio of eight retirement communities totaling 1,671 units from Health Care REIT, Inc. and certain of its affiliates for a cash purchase price of $476,000,000. We leased the portfolio under a triple-net master lease to an affiliate of Senior Living, the current tenant of the facilities. The Senior Living portfolio initially included seven entrance-fee communities and one senior living campus. In November 2016 we expanded the portfolio under lease to Senior Living with the acquisition, for $74,000,000, of Evergreen Woods, a 299-unit entrance fee community in Connecticut. As currently configured,
8
the 15-year master lease contains two 5-year renewal options and provides for 2017 cash rent of $38,740,000, subject to a 4% annual escalator in 2018 and 3% annual escalators through lease expiration in 2029 and any renewal periods.
In connection with the 2014 acquisition, we provided a $15,000,000 revolving line of credit to Senior Living, the maturity of which mirrors the term of the master lease. Borrowings are used primarily to finance construction projects within the Senior Living Portfolio, including building additional units. Amounts outstanding under the facility,
$4,743,000
at
December 31, 2016
, bear interest at an annual rate equal to the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate,
2.45%
at
December 31, 2016
, plus
6%
.
Of our total revenues,
$40,332,000
(
16%
),
$39,422,000
(
17%
) and
$1,533,000
(
1%
) were derived from Senior Living for the years ending
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, including
$7,369,000
,
$8,422,000
and
$328,000
, respectively, in straight-line rent.
NHC
NHC is a publicly-held company and the lessee of our legacy properties. We lease
42
facilities to NHC comprised of
3
independent living facilities and
39
skilled nursing facilities (4 of which are subleased to other parties for whom the lease payments are guaranteed to us by NHC). These facilities are leased to NHC under the terms of an amended Master Lease Agreement dated October 17, 1991 (“the 1991 lease”) which includes our 35 remaining legacy properties and a Master Lease Agreement dated August 30, 2013 (“the 2013 lease”) which includes 7 skilled nursing facilities acquired from a third party. Under the terms of the 1991 lease, base annual rental of $30,750,000 escalates by 4% of the increase, if any, in each facility’s revenue over a 2007 base year. Similarly, the 2013 lease provides for base annual rental of $3,450,000 plus percentage rent equal to 4% of the increase, if any, in each facility’s annual revenue over a 2014 base year. The NHC escalator is contingent upon future facility revenue increases and therefore does not give rise to straight-line revenues.
Of our total revenues,
$37,626,000
(
15%
),
$36,625,000
(
16%
) and
$36,453,000
(
21%
) in
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively, were derived from the two lease agreements with NHC.
NHC owned
1,630,462
shares of our common stock at
December 31, 2016
. The chairman of our board of directors is also a director on NHC’s board.
Bickford
As of
December 31, 2016
, our Bickford portfolio (leased to Sycamore Street, LLC, an affiliate of Bickford) consists of
42
facilities of which
two
are under construction and expected to open in mid-2017. NHI has an exclusive right to future Bickford acquisitions, development projects and refinancing transactions. Of our total revenues, $
30,732,000
, (
12%
),
$24,121,000
(
11%
) and
$21,421,000
(
12%
) were recognized as rental income from Bickford for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively, including
$858,000
,
$267,000
and
$476,000
, respectively, in straight-line rent.
Commitments and Contingencies
The following tables summarize information as of
December 31, 2016
related to our outstanding commitments and contingencies which are more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, included herein.
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Loan Commitments:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Life Care Services Note A
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
$
|
60,000,000
|
|
$
|
(42,944,000
|
)
|
$
|
17,056,000
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
14,000,000
|
|
(2,413,000
|
)
|
11,587,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
SHO
|
Revolving Credit
|
29,000,000
|
|
(15,639,000
|
)
|
13,361,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Senior Living Management
|
SHO
|
Mezzanine
|
24,500,000
|
|
(12,556,000
|
)
|
11,944,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
127,500,000
|
|
$
|
(73,552,000
|
)
|
$
|
53,948,000
|
|
|||||||
9
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Development Commitments:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Legend/The Ensign Group
|
SNF
|
Purchase
|
$
|
56,000,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
56,000,000
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
55,000,000
|
|
(49,097,000
|
)
|
5,903,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Chancellor Health Care
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
650,000
|
|
(52,000
|
)
|
598,000
|
|
|||||||
|
East Lake/Watermark Retirement
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
10,000,000
|
|
(3,450,000
|
)
|
6,550,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Santé Partners
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
3,500,000
|
|
(2,621,000
|
)
|
879,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
2,400,000
|
|
—
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|||||||
|
East Lake Capital Management
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
400,000
|
|
—
|
|
400,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Woodland Village
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
350,000
|
|
(227,000
|
)
|
123,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
128,300,000
|
|
$
|
(55,447,000
|
)
|
$
|
72,853,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Contingencies:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
East Lake Capital Management
|
SHO
|
Lease Inducement
|
$
|
8,000,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
8,000,000
|
|
||||
|
Sycamore Street (Bickford affiliate)
|
SHO
|
Letter-of-credit
|
3,930,000
|
|
—
|
|
3,930,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction Loan
|
2,000,000
|
|
—
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
13,930,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
13,930,000
|
|
|||||||
Sources of Revenues
General.
Our revenues are derived primarily from rental income, mortgage and other note interest income and income from our other investments, substantially all of which are in marketable securities, including the common stock of other healthcare REITs. During
2016
, rental income was
$232,393,000
(
93%
), interest income from mortgages and other notes was
$13,805,000
(
6%
) and income from our other investments was
$2,302,000
(
1%
) of total revenue of
$248,500,000
. Our revenues depend on the operating success of our tenants and borrowers whose source and amount of revenues are determined by (i) the licensed beds or other capacity of the facility, (ii) their occupancy rate, (iii) the extent to which the services provided at each facility are utilized by the residents and patients, (iv) the mix of private pay, Medicare and Medicaid patients, and (v) the rates paid by private payors and by the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Government Regulation
Medicare and Medicaid.
A significant portion of the revenue of our SNF lessees and borrowers is derived from government funded reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Reimbursement under these programs is subject to periodic payment review and other audits by federal and state authorities. Medicare is uniform nationwide and reimburses skilled nursing facilities under PPS which is based on a predetermined, fixed amount. PPS is an acuity based classification system that uses nursing and therapy indexes adjusted by geographical wage indexes to calculate per diem rates for each Medicare patient. Payment rates are updated annually and are generally adjusted each October when the federal fiscal year begins. The current acuity classification system is named Resource Utilization Groups IV (“RUGs IV”) and was effective October 1, 2010. Federal legislative policies have been adopted and continue to be proposed that would provide small increases in annual Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities. For example, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) announced the Skilled Nursing Facilities – PPS final rule for fiscal year 2017 which increased Medicare payments to SNF operators by only 1.6% beginning October 1, 2016. The fiscal year 2016 increase was 1.2%, the fiscal year 2015 increase was 2.0% and the fiscal year 2014 increase was 1.4%. In the future, any failure of Congress to agree on spending reductions to meet long-term mandated deficit reduction goals would trigger automatic spending cuts of 2% to Medicare.
RUGs IV incorporated changes to PPS that significantly altered how SNFs are paid for rendering care. Some examples are as follows:
|
•
|
A shift to 66 payment categories from 53 payment categories;
|
|
•
|
Changes related to assessment reference dates and qualifiers that will significantly reduce utilization of rehabilitation and extensive service categories;
|
|
•
|
Modification to therapy services related to estimating treatments and utilization of concurrent therapy that will likely result in RUG classifications at much lower levels of therapy than previous results; and
|
10
|
•
|
Adjustments related to assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and an increased emphasis on ADL scores in the nursing case mix indices and related RUG payment rates.
|
Medicaid is a joint federal and state program designed to provide medical assistance to “eligible needy persons.” Medicaid programs are operated by state agencies that adopt their own medical reimbursement methodology and standards. Payment rates and covered services vary from state to state. In many instances, revenues from Medicaid programs are insufficient to cover the actual costs incurred in providing care to those patients. With regard to Medicaid payment increases to skilled nursing operators, changes in federal funding coupled with state budget problems have produced uncertainty. States will more than likely be unable to keep pace with SNF inflation. States are under pressure to pursue other alternatives to long term care such as community and home-based services. Furthermore, several of the states in which we have investments have actively sought to reduce or slow the increase of Medicaid spending for SNF care.
Medicare and Medicaid programs are highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. Moreover, as health care facilities have experienced increasing pressure from private payors attempting to control health care costs, reimbursement from private payors has in many cases effectively been reduced to levels approaching those of government payors. Healthcare reimbursement will likely continue to be of significant importance to federal and state programs. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or the effect that any future legislative reforms may have on our lessees’ and borrowers’ costs of doing business and on the amount of reimbursement by government and other third-party payors. There can be no assurance that future payment rates for either government or private payors will be sufficient to cover cost increases in providing services to patients. Any changes in government or private payor reimbursement policies which reduce payments to levels that are insufficient to cover the cost of providing patient care could adversely affect the operating revenues of tenants and borrowers in our properties that rely on such payments, and thereby adversely affect their ability to make their lease or debt payments to us. Failure of our tenants and borrowers to make their scheduled lease and loan payments to us would have a direct and material adverse impact on us.
Licensure and Certification.
The health care industry is highly regulated by federal, state and local law and is directly affected by state and local licensing requirements, facility inspections, state and federal reimbursement policies, regulations concerning capital and other expenditures, certification requirements and other such laws, regulations and rules. Sanctions for failure to comply with these regulations and laws include (but are not limited to) loss of licensure, fines and loss of certification to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, as well as potential criminal penalties. The failure of any tenant or borrower to comply with such laws, requirements and regulations could affect their ability to operate the facility or facilities and could adversely affect such tenant’s or borrower’s ability to make lease or debt payments to us.
In the past several years, due to rising health care costs, there has been an increased emphasis on detecting and eliminating fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Payment of any consideration in exchange for referral of Medicare and Medicaid patients is generally prohibited by federal statute, which subjects violators to severe penalties, including exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, fines and even prison sentences. In recent years, both federal and state governments have significantly increased investigation and enforcement activity to detect and punish wrongdoers. In addition, legislation has been adopted at both state and federal levels which severely restrict the ability of physicians to refer patients to entities in which they have a financial interest.
It is anticipated that the trend toward increased investigation and enforcement activity in the area of fraud and abuse, as well as self-referral, will continue in future years. Certain of our investments are with lessees or borrowers which are partially or wholly owned by physicians. In the event that any lessee or borrower were to be found in violation of laws regarding fraud and abuse or self-referral, that lessee’s or borrower’s ability to operate the facility could be jeopardized, which could adversely affect the lessee’s or borrower’s ability to make lease or debt payments to us and could thereby adversely affect us.
Certificates Of Need.
The SNFs and hospitals in which we invest are also generally subject to state statutes which may require regulatory approval in the form of a CON prior to the construction or expansion of facilities to accommodate new beds (or addition of new beds to existing facilities), the addition of services or certain capital expenditures. CON requirements are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change. We cannot predict the impact of regulatory changes with respect to CONs on the operations of our lessees and borrowers; however, in our primary market areas, a significant reduction in new construction of long-term care beds has occurred.
Investment Policies
Our investment objectives are (i) to provide consistent and growing current income for distribution to our stockholders through investments primarily in health care related facilities or in the operations thereof through independent third-party management, (ii) to provide the opportunity to realize capital growth resulting from appreciation, if any, in the residual value of our portfolio properties, and (iii) to preserve and protect stockholders’ capital through a balance of diversity, flexibility and liquidity. There can
11
be no assurance that these objectives will be realized. Our investment policies include making investments in real estate, mortgage and other notes receivable, marketable securities, including the common stock of other REITs, and joint ventures structured to comply with the provisions of RIDEA.
As described in Item 7 and in Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, included herein, we have funded or made commitments to fund new investments in real estate and loans since January 1,
2016
totaling
$447,663,000
, and we anticipate making additional investments in
2017
that meet our underwriting criteria. In making new investments, we consider such factors as (i) the geographic area and type of property, (ii) the location, construction quality, condition and design of the property, (iii) the current and anticipated cash flow and its adequacy to meet operational needs, and lease or mortgage obligations to provide a competitive income return to our investors, (iv) the growth, tax and regulatory environments of the communities in which the properties are located, (v) occupancy and demand for similar facilities in the same or nearby communities, (vi) the quality, experience and creditworthiness of the management operating the facilities located on the property and (vii) the mix of private and government-sponsored residents. There can be no assurances that investments meeting our standards regarding these attributes will be found or closed.
We will not, without the approval of a majority of the Board of Directors and review of a committee comprised of independent directors, enter into any joint venture relationships with or acquire from or sell to any director, officer or employee of NHI, or any affiliate thereof, as the case may be, any of our assets or other property.
The Board of Directors, without the approval of the stockholders, may alter our investment policies if it determines that such a change is in our best interests and our stockholders’ best interests. The methods of implementing our investment policies may vary as new investment and financing techniques are developed or for other reasons. Management may recommend changes in investment criteria from time to time.
Future investments in health care related facilities may utilize borrowed funds or issuance of equity when it is advisable in the opinion of the Board of Directors. We may negotiate lines of credit or arrange for other short or long-term borrowings from lenders. We may arrange for long-term borrowings from institutional investors or through public offerings. We have previously invested and may in the future invest in properties subject to existing loans or secured by mortgages, deeds of trust or similar liens with favorable terms or in mortgage investment pools.
Executive Officers of the Company
The table below sets forth the name, position and age of each of our executive officers. Each executive officer is appointed by the Board of Directors, serves at its pleasure and holds office for a term of one year. There is no “family relationship” among any of the named executive officers or with any director. All information is given as of February 15, 2017:
|
Name
|
Position
|
Age
|
|
Eric Mendelsohn
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
55
|
|
Roger R. Hopkins
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
55
|
|
Kristin S. Gaines
|
Chief Credit Officer
|
45
|
|
Kevin Pascoe
|
Executive Vice President Investments
|
36
|
|
John Spaid
|
Executive Vice President Finance
|
57
|
Eric Mendelsohn joined NHI in January 2015. He has over 15 years of healthcare real estate and financing experience. Previously, Mr. Mendelsohn was with Emeritus Senior Living for 9 years, most recently as a Senior Vice President of Corporate Development where he was responsible for the financing and acquisition of assisted living properties, home health care companies, administration of joint venture relationships and executing corporate finance strategies. Prior to Emeritus, he was with the University of Washington as a Transaction Officer where he worked on the development, acquisition and financing of research, clinical and medical properties and has been a practicing transaction attorney, representing lenders and landlords. Mr. Mendelsohn holds a Bachelor of Science from American University in International Relations, a Law Degree from Pepperdine University, and a Masters (LLM) in Banking and Finance from Boston University. Mr. Mendelsohn is a member of the Florida and Washington State Bar Associations.
Roger R. Hopkins joined the former management advisor of NHI in July 2006 and was named Chief Accounting Officer for NHI in December 2006. With nearly 35 years of combined financial experience in public accounting and the real estate industry, he positioned companies to access public and private capital markets for equity and debt. Mr. Hopkins is responsible for the development of financial and tax strategies, reporting metrics, supplemental data reports and NHI’s internal control system. He has accounted for significant acquisitions and financings by NHI, including the successful executions of convertible debt and follow-on equity offerings, private debt placements and bank financing arrangements. Mr. Hopkins was an Audit Partner in the
12
Nashville office of Rodefer Moss & Co, a regional accounting firm with seven offices in Tennessee, Indiana and Kentucky, where he brought extensive experience in Securities and Exchange Commission filing requirements and compliance issues. He was previously a Senior Manager in the Nashville office of Deloitte. Mr. Hopkins received his Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Tennessee Technological University in 1982 and is a CPA licensed in Tennessee.
Kristin S. Gaines was appointed NHI’s Chief Credit Officer in February 2010. She joined NHI in 1998 as a Credit Analyst. During her tenure with NHI, Ms. Gaines has had a progressive career in the areas of finance and operations. Her experience has resulted in a breadth of expertise in underwriting, portfolio oversight and real estate finance. Ms. Gaines holds an MBA and a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from Middle Tennessee State University.
Kevin Pascoe joined NHI in June 2010. Mr. Pascoe oversees NHI’s portfolio of assets, relationship management with existing tenants and conducts operational due diligence on NHI’s existing investments and new investment opportunities. He has over 10 years of health care real estate background including his experience with General Electric - Healthcare Financial Services (“GE HFS”) (2006 – 2010) where he most recently served as a Vice President. With GE HFS, he moved up through the organization while working on various assignments including relationship management, deal restructuring, and special assets. He also was awarded an assignment in the GE Capital Global Risk Rotation Program. Mr. Pascoe holds an MBA and a Bachelor of Business Administration in Economics from Middle Tennessee State University.
John Spaid joined NHI in March 2016. He oversees the Company’s banking relationships and financial transactions. Mr. Spaid has nearly 30 years of experience in real estate, finance and senior housing. Previously, he was with Emeritus Senior Living as a Senior Vice President whose responsibilities included budget and forecasting, debt and lease obligation underwriting, merger and acquisition processes, financial modeling, due diligence, board and investor presentations, employee development and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. Mr. Spaid has been an independent financial consultant and has also served as the CFO of a regional assisted living and memory care provider in Redmond, Washington. Mr. Spaid holds an MBA from the University of Michigan and a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of Texas.
We have a staff of 15, all serving in our corporate office in Murfreesboro, TN. Essential services such as internal audit, tax compliance, information technology and legal services are outsourced to third-party professional firms.
Investor Information
We publish our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, quarterly Supplemental Information, current reports on Form 8-K, and press releases to our website at www.nhireit.com. We have a policy of publishing these on the website within two (2) business days after public release or filing with the SEC.
We also maintain the following documents on our web site:
|
▪
|
The NHI Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. This has been adopted for all employees, officers and directors of the Company.
|
|
▪
|
Information on our “NHI Valuesline” which allows all interested parties to communicate with NHI executive officers and directors. The toll free number is 877-880-2974 and the communications may be made anonymously, if desired.
|
|
▪
|
The NHI Restated Audit Committee Charter.
|
|
▪
|
The NHI Revised Compensation Committee Charter.
|
|
▪
|
The NHI Revised Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.
|
|
▪
|
The NHI Corporate Governance Guidelines.
|
We will furnish, free of charge, a copy of any of the above documents to any interested investor upon receipt of a written request.
Our transfer agent is Computershare. Computershare will assist registered owners with the NHI Dividend Reinvestment plan, change of address, transfer of ownership, payment of dividends, replacement of lost checks or stock certificates. Computershare’s contact information is: Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078. The toll free number is 800-942-5909 and the website is www.computershare.com.
The Annual Stockholders’ meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. local time on
Monday, May 8, 2017
at Embassy Suites, 1200 Conference Center Boulevard, Murfreesboro, TN.
13
We depend on the operating success of our tenants and borrowers for collection of our lease and note payments.
Revenues to operators of our properties are primarily driven by occupancy, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and private pay rates. Revenues from government reimbursement have, and may continue to, come under pressure due to reimbursement cuts and from widely-publicized federal and state budget shortfalls and constraints. Periods of weak economic growth in the U.S. which affect housing sales, investment returns and personal incomes may adversely affect senior housing occupancy rates. Expenses for the facilities are driven by the costs of labor, food, utilities, taxes, insurance and rent or debt service. Liability insurance and staffing costs continue to increase for our operators. To the extent any decrease in revenues and/or any increase in operating expenses results in a property not generating enough cash to make scheduled payments to us, our revenues, net income and funds from operations would be adversely affected. Such events and circumstances would cause us to evaluate whether there was an impairment of the real estate or mortgage loan that should be charged to earnings. Such impairment would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeded its fair value. Consequently, we might be unable to maintain or increase our current dividend and the market price of our stock may decline.
We depend on the success of property development and construction activities, which may fail to achieve the operating results we expect.
When we decide to invest in the renovation of an existing property or in the development of a new property, we make assumptions about the future potential cash flows of that property. We estimate our return based on expected occupancy, rental rates and future capital costs. If our projections prove to be inaccurate due to increased capital costs, lower occupancy or other factors, our investment in that property may not generate the cash flow we expected. Recently developed properties may take longer than expected to achieve stabilized operating levels, if at all. To the extent such facilities fail to reach stabilized operating levels or achieve stabilization later than expected, it could materially adversely affect our tenants’ abilities to make payments to us under their leases and thus adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are exposed to the risk that our tenants and borrowers may become subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings for other reasons.
Although our operating lease agreements provide us the right to evict an operator, demand immediate payment of rent and exercise other remedies, and our mortgage loans provide us the right to terminate any funding obligations, demand immediate repayment of principal and unpaid interest, foreclose on the collateral and exercise other remedies, the bankruptcy laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. A tenant or borrower in bankruptcy may be able to limit or delay our ability to collect unpaid rent in the case of a lease or to receive unpaid principal and/or interest in the case of a mortgage loan and to exercise other rights and remedies. We may be required to fund certain expenses (e.g. real estate taxes, maintenance and capital improvements) to preserve the value of a property, avoid the imposition of liens on a property and/or transition a property to a new tenant or borrower. In some instances, we have terminated our lease with a tenant and leased the facility to another tenant. In some of those situations, we provided working capital loans to, and limited indemnification of, the new tenant. If we cannot transition a leased facility to a new tenant, we may take possession of that property, which may expose us to certain successor liabilities. Should such events occur, our revenue and operating cash flow may be adversely affected.
We are exposed to risks related to governmental regulations and payors, principally Medicare and Medicaid, and the effect that lower reimbursement rates would have on our tenants’ and borrowers’ business.
Our tenants’ and borrowers’ businesses are affected by government reimbursement and the rates paid by private pay sources. To the extent that any of our facilities receive a significant portion of their revenues from governmental payors, primarily Medicare and Medicaid, such revenues may be subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive rate adjustments, recovery of program overpayments or set-offs, administrative rulings, policy interpretations, payment or other delays by fiscal intermediaries, government funding restrictions (at a program level or with respect to specific facilities) and interruption or delays in payments due to any ongoing governmental investigations and audits at such facilities. In recent years, governmental payors have frozen or reduced payments to health care providers due to budgetary pressures. Such reductions in Medicare reimbursement will have an adverse effect on the financial operations of our borrowers and lessees who operate SNFs. Changes in health care reimbursement will likely continue to be of paramount importance to federal and state programs. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or effect any future legislative reforms may have on the financial condition of the health care industry. There can be no assurance that adequate reimbursement levels will continue to be available for services provided by any facility operator, whether the facility receives reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid or private pay sources. Significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees could have a material adverse effect on an operator’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, which could adversely affect the ability of an operator to meet its obligations to us. In addition, the
14
replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the facility or the replacement of the operator licensed to manage the facility.
We are exposed to the risk that the cash flows of our tenants and borrowers would be adversely affected by increased liability claims and liability insurance costs.
ALF and SNF operators have experienced substantial increases in both the number and size of patient care liability claims in recent years, particularly in the states of Texas and Florida. As a result, general and professional liability costs have increased and may continue to increase. Nationwide, long-term care liability insurance rates are increasing because of large jury awards in states like Texas and Florida. Both Texas and Florida have now adopted SNF liability laws that modify or limit tort damages. Despite some of these reforms, the long-term care industry overall continues to experience very high general and professional liability costs. Insurance companies have responded to this claims crisis by severely restricting their capacity to write long-term care general and professional liability policies. No assurance can be given that the climate for long-term care general and professional liability insurance will improve in any of the foregoing states or any other states where the facility operators conduct business. Insurance companies may continue to reduce or stop writing general and professional liability policies for ALFs and SNFs. Thus, general and professional liability insurance coverage may be restricted, very costly or not available, which may adversely affect the facility operators’ future operations, cash flows and financial condition and may have a material adverse effect on the facility operators’ ability to meet their obligations to us.
We are exposed to risks related to environmental laws and the costs associated with liabilities related to hazardous substances.
Under various federal and state laws, owners or operators of real property may be required to respond to the release of hazardous substances on the property and may be held liable for property damage, personal injuries or penalties that result from environmental contamination. These laws also expose us to the possibility that we may become liable to reimburse the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Generally, such liability attaches to a person based on the person’s relationship to the property. Our tenants or borrowers are primarily responsible for the condition of the property and since we are a passive landlord, we do not “participate in the management” of any property in which we have an interest. Moreover, we review environmental site assessment of the properties that we purchase or encumber prior to taking an interest in them. Those assessments are designed to meet the “all appropriate inquiry” standard, which qualifies us for the innocent purchaser defense if environmental liabilities arise. Based upon such assessments, we do not believe that any of our properties are subject to material environmental contamination. However, environmental liabilities, including mold, may be present in our properties and we may incur costs to remediate contamination, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
We are exposed to the risk that we may not be fully indemnified by our lessees and borrowers against future litigation.
Our leases require that the lessee name us as an additional insured party on the tenant’s insurance policy in regard to claims made for professional liability or personal injury. The leases also require the tenant to indemnify and hold us harmless for all claims resulting from the occupancy and use of each facility. We cannot give any assurance that these protective measures will completely eliminate any risk to us related to future litigation, the costs of which could have a material adverse impact on us.
We depend on the success of our future acquisitions and investments.
We are exposed to the risk that our future acquisitions may not prove to be successful. We could encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities, and newly acquired properties might require significant management attention that would otherwise be devoted to our existing business. If we agree to provide construction funding to a borrower and the project is not completed, we may need to take steps to ensure completion of the project or we could lose the property. Moreover, if we issue equity securities or incur additional debt, or both, to finance future acquisitions, it may reduce our per share financial results. These costs may negatively affect our results of operations.
We depend on our ability to reinvest cash in real estate investments in a timely manner and on acceptable terms.
From time to time, we will have cash available from (1) the proceeds of sales of our securities, (2) principal payments on our notes receivable and (3) the sale of properties, including tenant purchase option exercises, under the terms of master leases or similar financial support arrangements. We must reinvest these proceeds, on a timely basis, in health care investments or in qualified short-term investments. We compete for real estate investments with a broad variety of potential investors. This competition for attractive investments may negatively affect our ability to make timely investments on terms acceptable to us. Delays in acquiring properties may negatively impact revenues and the amount of distributions to stockholders.
15
We may need to refinance existing debt or incur additional debt in the future, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us.
We operate with a policy of incurring debt when, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, it is advisable. Currently, we believe that our current liquidity, availability under our unsecured credit facility, and our capacity to service additional debt will enable us to meet our obligations, including dividends, and continue to make investments in healthcare real estate. While we currently have a very low debt ratio, in the future, we may increase our borrowings. We may incur additional debt by borrowing under our unsecured credit facility, mortgaging properties we own and/or issuing debt securities in a public offering or in a private transaction. We believe we will be able to raise additional debt and equity capital at reasonable costs to refinance our existing indebtedness at or prior to its maturity. Our ability to raise reasonably priced capital is not guaranteed; we may be unable to raise reasonably priced capital because of reasons related to our business or for reasons beyond our control, such as market conditions. If our access to capital becomes limited, it could have an impact on our ability to refinance our debt obligations, fund dividend payments, acquire properties and fund acquisition activities.
We have covenants related to our indebtedness which impose certain operational limitations and a breach of those covenants could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The terms of our current indebtedness as well as debt instruments that the Company may enter into in the future are subject to customary financial and operational covenants. Among other things, these provisions require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. Our continued ability to incur debt and operate our business is subject to compliance with these covenants, which limit operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in a default under applicable debt instruments, even if payment obligations are satisfied. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from a breach of any of these covenants in our debt instruments, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to the risk that the illiquidity of real estate investments could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, our ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our properties in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be limited. All of our properties are "special purpose" properties that cannot be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use. Facilities that participate in Medicare or Medicaid must meet extensive program requirements, including physical plant and operational requirements, which are revised from time to time. Transfers of operations of facilities are subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations and other types of real estate. Thus, if the operation of any of our properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of improvements or other factors such that our lessee or borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the lease or mortgage loan, the liquidation value of the property may be less than the net book value or the amount owed on any related mortgage loan, because the property may not be readily adaptable to other uses. The sale of the property or the replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could also be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the property or the replacement of the operator with a new operator licensed to manage the facility. No assurances can be given that we will recognize full value for any property that we are required to sell for liquidity reasons. Should such events occur, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Certain tenants/operators in our portfolio account for a significant percentage of the rent we expect to generate from our portfolio, and the failure of any of these tenants/operators to meet their obligations to us could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
The successful performance of our real estate investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants/operators. As of December 31, 2016, approximately
61%
of our total revenue is generated by Holiday (
18%
), Senior Living (
16%
), NHC (
15%
), and Bickford (
12%
). Lease or interest payment defaults by these or other tenants/operators or declines in their operating performance could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. Further, we cannot assure you that we will be able to re-lease the property for the rent previously received, or at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the property at a loss. The result of any of the foregoing risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
We depend on revenues derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets, while a portion of our debt used to finance those investments bear interest at variable rates. This circumstance creates interest rate risk to the Company.
16
Our business model assumes that we can earn a spread between the returns earned from our investments in real estate as compared to our cost of capital, including debt and/or equity. Current interest rates on our debt are at historically low levels, and, as a result, the spread and our profitability on our investments have been at high levels. We are exposed to interest rate risk in the potential for a narrowing of our spread and profitability if interest rates increase in the future. Certain of our debt obligations are floating rate obligations with interest rates that vary with the movement of LIBOR or other indexes. Our revenues are derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets. Although our leases generally contain escalating rent clauses that provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, our interest costs for our existing floating rate debt and any new debt we incur would also increase. This increasing cost of debt could reduce our profitability by increasing the cost of financing our existing portfolio and our investment activity. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturity or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing. We manage a portion of our exposure to interest rate risk by accessing debt with staggered maturities and through the use of derivative instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements with major financial institutions. Increased interest rates may also negatively affect the market price of our common stock and increase the cost of new equity capital.
We are exposed to the risk that our assets may be subject to impairment charges.
Each quarter we evaluate our real estate investments and other assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions, operator performance and legal structure. If we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to make an adjustment to the net carrying value of the asset, which could have a material adverse effect on our reported results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge occurs.
We depend on the ability to continue to qualify for taxation as a Real Estate Investment Trust.
We intend to operate as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”) and believe we have and will continue to operate in such a manner. Since REIT qualification requires us to meet a number of complex requirements, it is possible that we may fail to fulfill them, and if we do, our earnings will be reduced by the amount of federal taxes owed. A reduction in our earnings would affect the amount we could distribute to our stockholders and the market price of our common stock.
We have ownership limits in our charter with respect to our common stock and other classes of capital stock which may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our common stock and preferred stock that are intended to assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT. Our charter provides that any transfer that would cause NHI to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons or would cause NHI to be “closely held” under the Internal Revenue Code would be void, which, subject to certain exceptions, results in no person or entity being allowed to own, actually or constructively, more than 9.9% of the outstanding shares of our stock. Our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a proposed transferee from the ownership limit and such an exemption has been granted through Excepted Holder Agreements to members of the Carl E. Adams family. Based on the Excepted Holder Agreements currently outstanding, the individual ownership limit for all other stockholders is approximately 7.5%. Our charter gives our Board of Directors broad powers to prohibit and rescind any attempted transfer in violation of the ownership limits. These ownership limits may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
We are subject to certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and bylaws that could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control transaction, even if the transaction involves a premium price for our common stock or our stockholders believe such transaction to be otherwise in their best interests.
The Maryland Business Combination Act provides that, unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of 10% or more of its assets, issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions with an “interested stockholder” or an affiliate of an interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, and thereafter, unless specified criteria are met. An interested stockholder is generally a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding stock of a Maryland corporation. Unless our Board of Directors takes action to exempt us, generally or with respect to certain transactions, from this statute in the future, the Maryland Business Combination Act will be applicable to business combinations between us and other persons. The Company’s charter and bylaws also contain certain provisions that could have the effect of
17
making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of the Company. Such provisions could limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for the common stock. These provisions include a staggered board of directors, blank check preferred stock, and the application of Maryland corporate law provisions on business combinations and control shares. The foregoing matters may, together or separately, have the effect of discouraging or making more difficult an acquisition or change of control of the Company.
Other risks.
See the notes to the consolidated financial statements, “Business” under Item 1 and “Legal Proceedings” under Item 3 herein for a discussion of various governmental regulations and operating factors relating to the health care industry and other factors and the risks inherent in them. You should carefully consider each of the foregoing risks before making any investment decisions in the Company. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing us. There may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently deem immaterial. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our shares of stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Given these risks and uncertainties, we can give no assurance that any forward-looking statements will, in fact, occur and, therefore, caution investors not to place undue reliance on them.
None.
18
|
PROPERTIES OWNED
|
||||||||||
|
Location
|
SHO
|
SNF
|
HOSP & MOB
|
Investment
|
||||||
|
Alabama
|
1
|
2
|
—
|
$
|
17,260,000
|
|
||||
|
Arkansas
|
2
|
—
|
—
|
49,789,000
|
|
|||||
|
Arizona
|
4
|
1
|
—
|
22,835,000
|
|
|||||
|
California
|
9
|
—
|
1
|
183,723,000
|
|
|||||
|
Connecticut
|
3
|
—
|
—
|
125,568,000
|
|
|||||
|
Florida
|
7
|
10
|
1
|
211,505,000
|
|
|||||
|
Georgia
|
5
|
—
|
—
|
112,103,000
|
|
|||||
|
Iowa
|
10
|
—
|
—
|
63,593,000
|
|
|||||
|
Idaho
|
4
|
—
|
—
|
29,373,000
|
|
|||||
|
Illinois
|
11
|
—
|
—
|
157,576,000
|
|
|||||
|
Indiana
|
8
|
—
|
—
|
74,583,000
|
|
|||||
|
Kansas
|
2
|
—
|
—
|
42,072,000
|
|
|||||
|
Kentucky
|
—
|
1
|
1
|
20,746,000
|
|
|||||
|
Louisiana
|
5
|
—
|
—
|
39,569,000
|
|
|||||
|
Massachusetts
|
—
|
4
|
—
|
13,730,000
|
|
|||||
|
Maryland
|
1
|
—
|
—
|
9,472,000
|
|
|||||
|
Michigan
|
5
|
—
|
—
|
30,060,000
|
|
|||||
|
Minnesota
|
4
|
—
|
—
|
21,400,000
|
|
|||||
|
Missouri
|
1
|
5
|
—
|
27,757,000
|
|
|||||
|
North Carolina
|
3
|
—
|
—
|
110,046,000
|
|
|||||
|
Nebraska
|
4
|
—
|
—
|
32,602,000
|
|
|||||
|
New Hampshire
|
—
|
3
|
—
|
23,687,000
|
|
|||||
|
New Jersey
|
1
|
—
|
—
|
24,380,000
|
|
|||||
|
Ohio
|
4
|
—
|
—
|
76,586,000
|
|
|||||
|
Oklahoma
|
1
|
—
|
—
|
21,137,000
|
|
|||||
|
Oregon
|
7
|
3
|
—
|
108,359,000
|
|
|||||
|
South Carolina
|
7
|
4
|
—
|
336,923,000
|
|
|||||
|
Tennessee
|
6
|
16
|
1
|
95,358,000
|
|
|||||
|
Texas
|
—
|
17
|
1
|
243,747,000
|
|
|||||
|
Virginia
|
3
|
1
|
—
|
29,066,000
|
|
|||||
|
Washington
|
6
|
—
|
—
|
96,715,000
|
|
|||||
|
Wisconsin
|
1
|
—
|
—
|
20,359,000
|
|
|||||
|
125
|
67
|
5
|
$
|
2,471,679,000
|
|
|||||
|
Corporate Office
|
1,175,000
|
|
||||||||
|
$
|
2,472,854,000
|
|
||||||||
|
ASSOCIATED WITH MORTGAGE LOAN INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
|
Location
|
SHO
|
SNF
|
Investment
|
|||||
|
Florida
|
1
|
—
|
$
|
10,000,000
|
|
|||
|
Illinois
|
1
|
—
|
2,413,000
|
|
||||
|
Minnesota
|
1
|
—
|
3,525,000
|
|
||||
|
Virginia
|
—
|
4
|
8,129,000
|
|
||||
|
Washington
|
1
|
—
|
75,112,000
|
|
||||
|
4
|
4
|
$
|
99,179,000
|
|
||||
19
10-YEAR LEASE EXPIRATIONS
The following table provides additional information on our leases which are scheduled to expire based on the maturity date contained in the most recent lease agreement or extension. We expect that, prior to maturity, we will negotiate new terms of a lease to either the current tenant or another qualified operator.
|
Annualized
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
||||||||||
|
Leases
|
Rentable
|
Number
|
Gross Rent**
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|||||||
|
Year
|
Expiring
|
Square Feet*
|
of Units/Beds
|
(
in thousands
)
|
|
Gross Rent
|
|
||||||
|
2017
|
9
|
—
|
1,191
|
$
|
10,644
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|||||
|
2018
|
16
|
61,500
|
731
|
11,446
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
2019
|
10
|
—
|
470
|
8,732
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
2020
|
6
|
27,017
|
224
|
2,871
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
2021
|
2
|
—
|
344
|
1,914
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
2022
|
17
|
—
|
648
|
10,846
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
2023
|
2
|
—
|
254
|
2,682
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
2024
|
8
|
—
|
379
|
3,984
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
2025
|
9
|
—
|
647
|
9,245
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
2026
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
||||||
|
Thereafter
|
118
|
—
|
14,567
|
159,195
|
|
71.8
|
%
|
||||||
*Rentable Square Feet represents total square footage in two MOB investments.
**Annualized Gross Rent refers to the amount of lease revenue that our portfolio would generate if all leases were in effect for the twelve-month calendar year, regardless of the commencement date, maturity date, or renewals.
Our facilities are subject to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. Our lessees and borrowers have indemnified, and are obligated to continue to indemnify us, against all liabilities arising from the operation of the facilities, and are further obligated to indemnify us against environmental or title problems affecting the real estate underlying such facilities. While there may be lawsuits pending against certain of the owners and/or lessees of the facilities, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending proceedings will have no material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Not Applicable
20
The Company’s charter contains certain provisions which are designed to ensure that the Company’s status as a REIT is protected for federal income tax purposes. One of these provisions provides that any transfer that would cause NHI to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons or would cause NHI to be “closely held” under the IRS Code would be void, which, subject to certain exceptions, results in no stockholder being allowed to own, either directly or indirectly pursuant to certain tax attribution rules, more than 9.9% of the Company’s stock. In 1991, the Board created an exception to this ownership limitation for Dr. Carl E. Adams, his spouse, Jennie Mae Adams, and their lineal descendants. Effective May 12, 2008, we entered into Excepted Holder Agreements with W. Andrew Adams and certain members of his family. These written agreements are intended to restate and replace the parties’ prior verbal agreement. Based on the Excepted Holder Agreements currently outstanding, the individual ownership limit for all other stockholders is approximately 7.5%. Our charter gives our Board of Directors broad powers to prohibit and rescind any attempted transfer in violation of the ownership limits. These agreements were entered into in connection with the Company’s announcement in 2008 of a stock purchase program pursuant to which the Company subsequently purchased 194,100 shares of its common stock in the public market from its stockholders.
A separate agreement was entered into with each of the spouse and children of Dr. Carl E. Adams and others within Mr. W. Andrew Adams’ family. We needed to enter into such an agreement with each family member because of the complicated ownership attribution rules under the Internal Revenue Code. The agreement permits the Excepted Holders to own stock in excess of 9.9% up to the limit specifically provided in the individual agreement and not lose rights with respect to such shares. However, if the stockholder’s stock ownership exceeds the limit, then such shares in excess of the limit become “Excess Stock” and lose voting rights and entitlement to receive dividends. The Excess Stock classification remains in place until the stockholder no longer exceeds the threshold limit specified in the Agreement. The purpose of these agreements is to ensure that the Company does not violate the prohibition against a REIT being closely held.
W. Andrew Adams’ Excess Holder Agreement also provides that he will not own shares of stock in any tenant of the Company if such ownership would cause the Company to constructively own more than a 9.9% interest in such tenant. Again, this prohibition is designed to protect the Company’s status as a REIT for tax purposes.
In order to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment accorded to a REIT, we must make distributions to holders of our common stock equal on an annual basis to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gains), as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Cash available for distribution to our stockholders is primarily derived from interest payments received on our notes and from rental payments received under our leases. All distributions will be made by us at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our cash flow and earnings, our financial condition, bank covenants contained in our financing documents and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. Our REIT taxable income is calculated without reference to our cash flow. Therefore, under certain circumstances, we may not have received cash sufficient to pay our required distributions.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NHI”. As of
February 14, 2017
, there were approximately 758 holders of record of shares and approximately 28,311 beneficial owners of shares.
High and low stock prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange and dividends declared for the last two years were:
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||||||
|
Sales Price
|
Cash Dividends Declared
|
Sales Price
|
Cash Dividends Declared
|
|||||||||
|
Quarter Ended
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||||
|
March 31
|
$67.26
|
$54.51
|
$.90
|
$76.98
|
$66.90
|
$.85
|
||||||
|
June 30
|
$75.11
|
$65.04
|
$.90
|
$72.77
|
$61.64
|
$.85
|
||||||
|
September 30
|
$82.53
|
$74.85
|
$.90
|
$66.28
|
$53.64
|
$.85
|
||||||
|
December 31
|
$79.09
|
$66.31
|
$.90
|
$62.40
|
$55.56
|
$.85
|
||||||
The closing price of our stock on
February 14, 2017
was
$73.00
.
21
We currently maintain two equity compensation plans: the 2005 Stock Option, Restricted Stock and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (“the 2005 Plan”) and the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 2012 Plan”). These plans, as amended, have been approved by our stockholders. The following table provides information as of
December 31, 2016
about our common stock that may be issued upon grants of restricted stock and the exercise of options under our existing equity compensation plans.
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)
|
||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved
|
||||||
|
by security holders
|
541,679
|
$63.73
|
1,446,668
1
|
|||
The following graph demonstrates the performance of the cumulative total return to the stockholders of our common stock during the previous five years in comparison to the cumulative total return on the MSCI US REIT Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index. The MSCI US REIT Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is comprised of Equity REIT securities. The MSCI US REIT Index includes securities with exposure to core real estate (e.g.residential and retail properties) as well as securities with exposure to other types of real estate (e.g.casinos, theaters).
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
|
|
NHI
|
$100.00
|
$134.31
|
$177.48
|
$184.95
|
$169.37
|
$214.30
|
|
MSCI
|
$100.00
|
$117.77
|
$139.08
|
$157.34
|
$161.30
|
$175.17
|
|
S&P 500
|
$100.00
|
$114.23
|
$164.86
|
$171.93
|
$174.31
|
$195.16
|
22
The following table represents our financial information for the five years ended
December 31, 2016
. This financial information has been derived from our historical financial statements including those for the most recent three years included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with those consolidated financial statements, accompanying footnotes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7.
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
248,500
|
|
$
|
228,988
|
|
$
|
177,509
|
|
$
|
117,828
|
|
$
|
93,317
|
|
||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
152,716
|
|
150,314
|
|
103,052
|
|
79,498
|
|
72,834
|
|
|||||||||
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Income from operations - discontinued
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,426
|
|
6,098
|
|
|||||||||
|
Gain on sales of real estate
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
22,258
|
|
11,966
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income
|
152,716
|
|
150,314
|
|
103,052
|
|
107,182
|
|
90,898
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(1,176
|
)
|
(1,452
|
)
|
(1,443
|
)
|
(999
|
)
|
(167
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
151,540
|
|
$
|
148,862
|
|
$
|
101,609
|
|
$
|
106,183
|
|
$
|
90,731
|
|
||||
|
PER SHARE DATA:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
$
|
2.77
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
||||
|
Discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
.97
|
|
.65
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
||||
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
$
|
3.95
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
$
|
2.77
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
||||
|
Discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
.97
|
|
.65
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
$
|
3.95
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
||||
|
OTHER DATA:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common shares outstanding, end of year
|
39,847,860
|
|
38,396,727
|
|
37,485,902
|
|
33,051,176
|
|
27,857,217
|
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
39,013,412
|
|
37,604,594
|
|
33,375,966
|
|
28,362,398
|
|
27,811,813
|
|
|||||||||
|
Diluted
|
39,155,380
|
|
37,644,171
|
|
33,416,014
|
|
28,397,702
|
|
27,838,720
|
|
|||||||||
|
Regular dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
$
|
3.08
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
||||
|
Special dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
.22
|
|
||||
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
(at year end)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate properties, net
|
$
|
2,159,774
|
|
$
|
1,836,807
|
|
$
|
1,776,549
|
|
$
|
1,247,740
|
|
$
|
535,390
|
|
||||
|
Mortgages and other notes receivable, net
|
$
|
133,493
|
|
$
|
133,714
|
|
$
|
63,630
|
|
$
|
60,639
|
|
$
|
84,250
|
|
||||
|
Investments in preferred stock and marketable securities
|
$
|
11,745
|
|
$
|
72,744
|
|
$
|
53,635
|
|
$
|
50,782
|
|
$
|
51,016
|
|
||||
|
Assets held for sale, net
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,346
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,611
|
|
||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
2,403,633
|
|
$
|
2,133,218
|
|
$
|
1,982,960
|
|
$
|
1,455,820
|
|
$
|
705,981
|
|
||||
|
Debt
|
$
|
1,115,981
|
|
$
|
914,443
|
|
$
|
862,726
|
|
$
|
617,080
|
|
$
|
203,250
|
|
||||
|
Total equity
|
$
|
1,209,590
|
|
$
|
1,142,460
|
|
$
|
1,049,933
|
|
$
|
777,160
|
|
$
|
468,047
|
|
||||
23
The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of National Health Investors, Inc. for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other important factors are identified in “Item 1. Business” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
Executive Overview
National Health Investors, Inc., established in 1991 as a Maryland corporation, is a self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in sale-leaseback, joint-venture, mortgage and mezzanine financing of need-driven and discretionary senior housing and medical investments. Our portfolio consists of lease, mortgage and other note investments in independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities, senior living campuses, skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and medical office buildings. Other investments have included marketable securities and a joint venture structured to comply with the provisions of the REIT Investment Diversification Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”) through which we invested in facility operations managed by an independent third-party. We fund our real estate investments primarily through: (1) operating cash flow, (2) debt offerings, including bank lines of credit and term debt, both unsecured and secured, and (3) the sale of equity securities.
Portfolio
At
December 31, 2016
, we had investments in real estate, mortgage and other notes receivable involving
205
facilities located in
32
states. These investments involve
129
senior housing properties,
71
skilled nursing facilities,
3
hospitals,
2
medical office buildings and other notes receivable. These investments (excluding our corporate office of
$1,175,000
) consisted of properties with an original cost of
$2,471,679,000
, rented under triple-net leases to
27
lessees, and
$133,493,000
aggregate carrying value of mortgage and other notes receivable due from
11
borrowers.
We classify the properties in our portfolio as either senior housing or medical properties. We further classify our senior housing properties as either need-driven (assisted living facilities and senior living campuses) or discretionary (independent living facilities and entrance-fee communities). Medical properties within our portfolio include skilled nursing facilities, medical office buildings and specialty hospitals.
24
The following tables summarize our investments in real estate and mortgage and other notes receivable as of
December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
Real Estate Properties
|
Properties
|
|
Beds/Sq. Ft.*
|
|
Revenue
|
%
|
Investment
|
|||||||||||
|
Senior Housing - Need-Driven
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Assisted Living
|
76
|
|
3,689
|
|
$
|
52,669
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
$
|
633,631
|
|
||||||
|
Senior Living Campus
|
10
|
|
1,323
|
|
14,325
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
162,007
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Senior Housing - Need-Driven
|
86
|
|
5,012
|
|
66,994
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
795,638
|
|
||||||||
|
Senior Housing - Discretionary
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Independent Living
|
29
|
|
3,212
|
|
45,949
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
512,302
|
|
||||||||
|
Entrance-Fee Communities
|
10
|
|
2,363
|
|
42,529
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
592,729
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Senior Housing - Discretionary
|
39
|
|
5,575
|
|
88,478
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
1,105,031
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Senior Housing
|
125
|
|
10,587
|
|
155,472
|
|
63.6
|
%
|
1,900,669
|
|
||||||||
|
Medical Facilities
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Skilled Nursing Facilities
|
67
|
|
8,687
|
|
67,080
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
509,393
|
|
||||||||
|
Hospitals
|
3
|
|
181
|
|
7,692
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
51,131
|
|
||||||||
|
Medical Office Buildings
|
2
|
|
88,517
|
|
*
|
1,001
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
10,486
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Medical Facilities
|
72
|
|
75,773
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
571,010
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total Real Estate Properties
|
197
|
|
$
|
231,245
|
|
94.7
|
%
|
$
|
2,471,679
|
|
||||||||
|
Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Senior Housing - Need-Driven
|
3
|
|
222
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
$
|
15,938
|
|
||||||
|
Senior Housing - Discretionary
|
1
|
|
400
|
|
7,976
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
75,112
|
|
||||||||
|
Medical Facilities
|
4
|
|
270
|
|
742
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
8,129
|
|
||||||||
|
Other Notes Receivable
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,313
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
34,314
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
|
8
|
|
892
|
|
12,827
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
133,493
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Portfolio
|
205
|
|
$
|
244,072
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
2,605,172
|
|
||||||||
|
Portfolio Summary
|
Properties
|
|
Beds/Sq. Ft.*
|
|
Revenue
|
%
|
Investment
|
|||||||||||
|
Real Estate Properties
|
197
|
|
$
|
231,245
|
|
94.7
|
%
|
$
|
2,471,679
|
|
||||||||
|
Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
|
8
|
|
12,827
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
133,493
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total Portfolio
|
205
|
|
$
|
244,072
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
2,605,172
|
|
||||||||
|
Summary of Facilities by Type
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Senior Housing - Need-Driven
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Assisted Living
|
79
|
|
3,911
|
|
$
|
53,465
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
$
|
649,569
|
|
||||||
|
Senior Living Campus
|
10
|
|
1,323
|
|
14,325
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
162,007
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Senior Housing - Need-Driven
|
89
|
|
5,234
|
|
67,790
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
811,576
|
|
||||||||
|
Senior Housing - Discretionary
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Entrance-Fee Communities
|
11
|
|
2,763
|
|
50,505
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
667,840
|
|
||||||||
|
Independent Living
|
29
|
|
3,212
|
|
45,949
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
512,302
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Senior Housing - Discretionary
|
40
|
|
5,975
|
|
96,454
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
1,180,142
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Senior Housing
|
129
|
|
11,209
|
|
164,244
|
|
67.2
|
%
|
1,991,718
|
|
||||||||
|
Medical Facilities
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Skilled Nursing Facilities
|
71
|
|
8,511
|
|
67,822
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
517,522
|
|
||||||||
|
Hospitals
|
3
|
|
181
|
|
7,692
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
51,131
|
|
||||||||
|
Medical Office Buildings
|
2
|
|
88,517
|
|
*
|
1,001
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
10,487
|
|
|||||||
|
Total Medical
|
76
|
|
76,515
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
579,140
|
|
||||||||||
|
Other Notes Receivable
|
—
|
|
3,313
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
34,314
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total Portfolio
|
205
|
|
$
|
244,072
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
2,605,172
|
|
||||||||
|
Portfolio by Operator Type
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Public
|
53
|
|
$
|
47,027
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
$
|
235,748
|
|
||||||||
|
National Chain (Privately-Owned)
|
27
|
|
46,618
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
521,139
|
|
||||||||||
|
Regional
|
112
|
|
134,325
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
1,660,367
|
|
||||||||||
|
Small
|
13
|
|
16,102
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
187,918
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total Portfolio
|
205
|
|
$
|
244,072
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
2,605,172
|
|
||||||||
25
For the year ended
December 31, 2016
, our tenants who provided more than 3% of our total revenues were (parent company, in alphabetical order): Bickford Senior Living; East Lake Capital Management; The Ensign Group; Holiday Retirement; National HealthCare Corporation; and Senior Living Communities.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our average effective annualized rental income was
$8,141
per bed for SNFs,
$15,364
per unit for ALFs,
$14,328
per unit for ILFs,
$20,810
per unit for EFCs,
$42,499
per bed for hospitals, and
$11
per square foot for MOBs.
We currently invest a portion of our funds in highly liquid marketable securities, including the common shares of other publicly held healthcare REITs. At
December 31, 2016
, such investments had a carrying value of
$11,745,000
.
Areas of Focus
We are evaluating and will potentially make additional investments during the remainder of 2017 while we continue to monitor and improve our existing properties. We seek tenants who will become mission-oriented partners in relationships where our business goals are aligned. This approach fuels steady, and thus, enduring growth for those partners and for NHI. Within the context of our growth model, we rely on a cost-effective access to debt and equity capital to finance acquisitions that will drive our earnings. There is significant competition for healthcare assets from other REITs, both public and private, and from private equity sources. Large-scale portfolios continue to command premium pricing, due to the continued abundance of private and foreign buyers seeking to invest in healthcare real estate. This combination of circumstances places a premium on our ability to execute acquisitions and negotiate leases that will generate meaningful earnings growth for our shareholders. We emphasize growth with our existing tenants and borrowers as a way to insulate us from other competition.
With lower capitalization rates for existing healthcare facilities, there has been increased interest in constructing new facilities in hopes of generating better returns on invested capital. Using our relationship-driven model, we continue to look for opportunities to support new and existing tenants and borrowers with the capital needed to expand existing facilities and to initiate ground-up development of new facilities. We concentrate our efforts in those markets where there is both a demonstrated demand for a particular product type and where we perceive we have a competitive advantage. The projects we agree to finance have attractive upside potential and are expected to provide above-average returns to our shareholders to mitigate the risks inherent with property development and construction.
On December 16, 2015, the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve announced an increase in its benchmark federal funds rate by 25 basis points. The anticipation of this second increase in the federal funds rate in the past year has been a primary source of much volatility in REIT equity markets. The Committee also guided expectations for three rate hikes in 2017.
As a result, there will be pressure on the spread between our cost of capital and the returns we earn. We expect that pressure to be partially mitigated by market forces that would tend to result in higher capitalization rates for healthcare assets and higher lease rates indicative of historical levels. Our cost of capital has increased over the past year as we transition some of our short term revolving borrowings into debt instruments with longer maturities and fixed interest rates. Managing long-term risk involves trade-offs with the competing alternative goal of maximizing short-term profitability. Our intention is to strike an appropriate balance between these competing interests within the context of our investor profile. Due to more favorable pricing, we presently prefer private placement debt over a public offering of bond debt. As interest rates rise, our share price may decline as investors adjust prices to reflect a dividend yield that is sufficiently in excess of a risk free rate.
For the
year ended
December 31, 2016
, approximately
27%
of our revenue was derived from operators of our skilled nursing facilities that receive a significant portion of their revenue from governmental payors, primarily Medicare and Medicaid. Such revenues are subject annually to statutory and regulatory changes and in recent years have been reduced due to federal and state budgetary pressures. Over the past five years, we have selectively diversified our portfolio by directing a significant portion of our investments into properties which do not rely primarily on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, but rather on private pay sources (assisted living and memory care facilities, senior living campuses, independent living facilities and entrance-fee communities). We will occasionally acquire skilled nursing facilities in good physical condition with a proven operator and strong local market fundamentals, because diversification implies a periodic rebalancing, but our recent investment focus has been on acquiring need-driven and discretionary senior housing assets.
Considering individual tenant lease revenue as a percentage of total revenue, Bickford Senior Living is our largest assisted living tenant, an affiliate of Holiday Retirement is our largest independent living tenant, National HealthCare Corporation is our largest skilled nursing tenant and Senior Living Communities is our largest entrance-fee community tenant. Our shift toward private payor facilities, as well as our expansion into the discretionary senior housing market, has further resulted in a portfolio whose current composition is relatively balanced between medical facilities, need-driven and discretionary senior housing.
26
We manage our business with a goal of increasing the regular annual dividends paid to shareholders. Our Board of Directors approves a regular quarterly dividend which is reflective of expected taxable income on a recurring basis. Our transactions that are infrequent and non-recurring that generate additional taxable income have been distributed to shareholders in the form of special dividends. Taxable income is determined in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and differs from net income for financial statements purposes determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our goal of increasing annual dividends requires a careful balance between identification of high-quality lease and mortgage assets in which to invest and the cost of our capital with which to fund such investments. We consider the competing interests of short and long-term debt (interest rates, maturities and other terms) versus the higher cost of new equity. We accept some level of risk associated with leveraging our investments. We intend to continue to make new investments that meet our underwriting criteria and where the spreads over our cost of capital will generate sufficient returns to our shareholders.
Our dividends for the current year and the last two years are as follows:
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||||
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
$
|
3.08
|
|
||
Our investments in healthcare real estate have been partially accomplished by our ability to effectively leverage our balance sheet. However, we continue to maintain a relatively low-leverage balance sheet compared with many in our peer group. We believe that our fixed charge coverage ratio, which is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations, excluding real estate asset impairments and gains on dispositions) to fixed charges (interest expense at contractual rates net of capitalized interest and principal payments on debt), and the ratio of consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA are meaningful measures of our ability to service our debt. We use these two measures as a useful basis to compare the strength of our balance sheet with those in our peer group. We also believe this gives us a competitive advantage when accessing debt markets.
We calculate our fixed charge coverage ratio as approximately
5.8x
for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
(see our discussion of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation to our net income on page 47). Giving effect to our acquisitions and financings on an annualized basis, our consolidated net debt-to Adjusted EBITDA ratio is approximately
4.4x
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
(in thousands)
:
|
Consolidated Total Debt
|
$
|
1,115,981
|
|
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents
|
(4,832
|
)
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Debt
|
$
|
1,111,149
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
237,049
|
|
|
Annualized impact of recent investments
|
17,057
|
|
|
|
$
|
254,106
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA
|
4.4
|
x
|
|
According to current projections by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the number of Americans 65 and older is expected to grow 36% between 2010 and 2020, compared to a 9% growth rate for the general population. As Transgenerationalaging.org notes: “The fastest growing segment of the total population is the oldest old - those 80 and over. Their growth rate is twice that of those 65 and over and almost 4 times that for the total population. In the United States, this group now represents 10% of the older population and will more than triple from 5.7 million in 2010 to over 19 million by 2050.”
While affordability issues will play a limiting role in the movement of this oldest age demographic into active participation in the senior care market, the swelling in the ranks of the very old is expected to increase demand for senior housing properties of all types in the coming decades. There is increasing demand for private-pay senior housing properties in countries outside the U.S. as well. We therefore consider real estate and note investments with U.S. entities who seek to expand their senior housing operations into countries where local-market demand is sufficiently demonstrated.
Strong demographic trends provide the context for continued growth in
2017
and the years ahead. We plan to fund any new real estate and mortgage investments during
2017
using our liquid assets and debt financing. Should the weight of additional debt as a result of new acquisitions suggest the need to rebalance our capital structure, we would then expect to access the capital
27
markets through an ATM or other equity offerings. Our disciplined investment strategy implemented through measured increments of debt and equity sets the stage for annual dividend growth, continued low leverage, a portfolio of diversified, high-quality assets, and business relationships with experienced operators who we make our priority, continue to be the key drivers of our business plan.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and cause our reported net income to vary significantly from period to period. If actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.
We consider an accounting estimate or assumption critical if:
|
1.
|
the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and
|
|
2.
|
the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.
|
Our significant accounting policies and the associated estimates, judgments and the issues which impact these estimates are as follows:
Valuations and Impairments
Our tenants and borrowers who operate SNFs derive their revenues primarily from Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs. Amounts paid under these government programs are subject to legislative and government budget constraints. From time to time, there may be material changes in government reimbursement. In the past, SNFs have experienced material reductions in government reimbursement.
The long-term health care industry has experienced significant professional liability claims which has resulted in an increase in the cost of insurance to cover potential claims. In previous years, these factors have combined to cause a number of bankruptcy filings, bankruptcy court rulings and court judgments affecting our lessees and borrowers. In prior years, we have determined that impairment of certain of our investments had occurred as a result of these events.
We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying values of our properties on a property-by-property basis. On a quarterly basis, we review our properties for recoverability when events or circumstances, including significant physical changes in the property, significant adverse changes in general economic conditions and significant deteriorations of the underlying cash flows of the property, indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable. The need to recognize an impairment charge is based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property compared to the carrying value of that property. If recognition of an impairment charge is necessary, it is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the fair value of the property.
For our mortgage and other notes receivable, we evaluate the estimated collectibility of contractual loan payments and general economic conditions on an instrument-by-instrument basis. On a quarterly basis, we review our notes receivable for ability to realize on such notes when events or circumstances, including the non-receipt of contractual principal and interest payments, significant deteriorations of the financial condition of the borrower and significant adverse changes in general economic conditions, indicate that the carrying amount of the note receivable may not be recoverable. If necessary, impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value as measured by the discounted cash flows expected to be received under the note receivable or, if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the note receivable.
We evaluate our marketable securities for other-than-temporary impairments. An impairment of a marketable security would be considered “other-than-temporary” unless we have the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient for a forecasted market price recovery up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment and evidence indicates the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time.
The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities is based on the amount paid to purchase the interest or the estimated fair value of the assets prior to our acquisition of interests in the entity. An aggregate basis difference between the cost
28
of our equity method investee and the amount of underlying equity in its net assets is primarily attributable to goodwill, which is not amortized. We evaluate for impairment our equity method investments and related goodwill based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the investments to their carrying value. When we determine a decline in the estimated fair value of such an investment below its carrying value is other than temporary, an impairment is recorded. No impairments to the carrying value of our equity method investee have been recorded for any period presented.
The determination of the fair value and whether a shortfall in operating revenues or the existence of operating losses is indicative of a loss in value that is other than temporary involves significant judgment. Our estimates consider all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at market rates, general economic conditions and trends, the duration of the fair value deficiency, and any other relevant factors. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.
While we believe that the carrying amounts of our properties are recoverable and our notes receivable, marketable securities and other investments are realizable, it is possible that future events could require us to make significant adjustments or revisions to these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We collect rent and interest from our tenants and borrowers. Generally, our policy is to recognize revenues on an accrual basis as earned. However, when we determine, based on insufficient historical collections and the lack of expected future collections, that rent or interest is not probable of collection until received, our policy is to recognize rental or interest income when assured, which we consider to be the period the amounts are collected. We identify investments as nonperforming if a required payment is not received within 30 days of the date it is due. This policy could cause our revenues to vary significantly from period to period. As of December 31, 2016, we have one lease, a 126-unit portfolio, for which we recognize rent income when received. The tenant was current on its lease obligations at December 31, 2016, but we continue to classify as non-performing per policy. Revenue from minimum lease payments under our leases is recognized on a straight-line basis to the extent that future lease payments are considered collectible. Lease payments that depend on a factor directly related to future use of the property, such as an increase in annual revenues over base year revenues, are considered to be contingent rentals, are included in rental income when they are determinable and earned.
REIT Qualification
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to evaluate our compliance with REIT requirements. Our determinations are based on interpretation of tax laws, and our conclusions may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. We believe that we have operated our business so as to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will be able to so qualify at all times. We record income tax expense or benefit with respect to our subsidiary which is taxed as a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) under provisions similar to those applicable to regular corporations. Aside from such income taxes that may be applicable to the taxable income in our TRS, we will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT and make distributions to stockholders equal to or in excess of our taxable income. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (at the corporate and stockholder levels) that typically applies to corporate dividends. Our failure to continue to qualify under the applicable REIT qualification rules and regulations would cause us to owe state and federal income taxes and would have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and the accounts of joint ventures in which we own a majority voting interest with the ability to control operations and where no substantive participating rights or substantive kick-out rights have been granted to the noncontrolling interests. In addition, we consolidate a legal entity deemed to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”) when we determine that we are the VIE’s primary beneficiary. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance for our arrangements with VIEs which requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected
29
residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We may change our assessment of a VIE due to events such as modifications of contractual arrangements that affect the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposal of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.
Real Estate Properties
Real property we develop is recorded at cost, including the capitalization of interest during construction. The cost of real property investments we acquire is allocated to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their relative fair values. We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land, equipment, buildings and other improvements, and intangible assets, if any. Our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term.
Significant Operators
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, we have four lessees (including their affiliated entities, which are the legal tenants) from whom we individually derive at least 10% of our rental income as follows (
dollars in thousands
):
|
Original
|
Rental Income
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Investment
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Lease
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Asset Class
|
Amount
|
2016
|
2015
|
Renewal
|
|||||||||||||
|
Holiday Retirement
|
ILF
|
$
|
493,378
|
|
$
|
43,817
|
|
19%
|
$
|
43,817
|
|
20%
|
2031
|
||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
EFC
|
546,292
|
|
40,332
|
|
17%
|
39,422
|
|
18%
|
2029
|
|||||||
|
National HealthCare Corporation
|
SNF
|
171,297
|
|
37,626
|
|
16%
|
36,625
|
|
17%
|
2026
|
|||||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
ALF
|
403,771
|
|
30,732
|
|
13%
|
24,121
|
|
11%
|
Various
|
|||||||
|
All others
|
Various
|
856,941
|
|
79,886
|
|
35%
|
70,462
|
|
34%
|
Various
|
|||||||
|
$
|
2,471,679
|
|
$
|
232,393
|
|
|
$
|
214,447
|
|
|
|||||||
Due to a combination of longer initial lease terms and generous escalators, straight line rent constituted a significant component of rental income recognized from the Holiday and Senior Living leases, whose communities we acquired in December 2013 and 2014, respectively. Straight-line rent of
$8,965,000
and
$10,466,000
was recognized from the Holiday lease for the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. Straight-line rent of
$7,369,000
and
$8,422,000
was recognized from the Senior Living lease for the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. Straight-line rent of
$858,000
and
$267,000
was recognized from the Bickford leases for the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. For NHC, rent escalations are based on a percentage increase in revenue over a base year and do not give rise to non-cash, straight-line rental income.
RIDEA
On September 30, 2016, NHI and Sycamore Street, LLC (“Sycamore”), an affiliate of Bickford Senior Living (“Bickford”) entered into a definitive agreement terminating our joint venture consisting of the ownership and operation of
35
properties and converting Bickford’s participation to a triple-net tenancy with assumption of existing leases and terms. Through September 30, 2016, NHI owned an
85%
equity interest and Sycamore owned a
15%
equity interest in our consolidated subsidiary (“PropCo”) which owned
35
assisted living/memory care facilities, three new facilities and two facilities in development. The facilities have been leased to an operating company (“OpCo”), in which NHI previously held a non-controlling 85% ownership interest. The facilities are managed by Bickford. The joint venture was structured to comply with the provisions of RIDEA.
The September 30, 2016 agreement provided for NHI’s redemption of Bickford’s
15%
interest in the real estate underlying the joint venture (PropCo) for a distribution to Bickford of
$25,100,000
, before the offset by Bickford of
$8,100,000
payable to NHI in acquisition of our non-controlling 85% interest in senior housing operations (OpCo), which NHI had carried on its balance sheet as an equity-method investment through September 30, 2016. The remaining distribution of
$10,546,000
related to the transaction was settled, along with the final operational accounting, in November 2016.
30
NHI’s gain of
$1,657,000
from the sale of OpCo was calculated on the difference between the proceeds of
$8,100,000
and the carrying amount of our equity-method investment of $6,443,000. No gain or loss was recognized on our acquisition of Bickford’s
15%
interest in PropCo, which had previously been consolidated. Rather, Bickford’s non-controlling interest was de-recognized, and the difference between the fair value of NHI’s cost allocated to the redemption and the carrying amount for Bickford’s non-controlling interest was recorded as an adjustment to equity through capital in excess of par. See Investment Highlights below for a discussion of new investments with Bickford during 2016.
Provisions governing details of the unwinding reach to our various arrangements with Bickford and include but are not limited to the following:
|
•
|
For the
32
stabilized facilities previously owned by the joint venture, forward annual contractual rent is unchanged at
$26,454,000
plus annual escalators of
3%
|
|
•
|
For the five additional facilities under development owned by NHI, of which one opened in July 2016, two opened in October 2016, and two are planned to open in the first half of 2017, funded amounts will be added to the lease basis during construction and up to the first six months after opening; thereafter, base rent will be charged to Bickford at a
9%
annual rate. Once the facilities are stabilized, as defined in the lease agreement, rent will be reset to fair market value.
|
|
•
|
Future development projects between the parties will be funded through a construction loan at
9%
annual interest. NHI has a purchase option at stabilization, whereby rent will be set based on our total investment with a floor of
9.55%
on NHI’s total investment.
|
|
•
|
On current and future development projects, Bickford as the operator will be entitled to incentive payments based on the achievement of predetermined operational milestones, the funding of which will increase the investment base for determining the lease payment to NHI.
|
The income statements for OpCo include the operating results of 32 same-store properties and 5 properties under development or lease-up. For accounting purposes, we are required to expense the pre-opening expenses and operating losses of newly-developed properties.
Unaudited summarized income statements for OpCo are presented below (
in thousands
):
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
63,943
|
|
$
|
77,349
|
|
$
|
65,704
|
|
||
|
Operating expenses, including management fees
|
45,415
|
|
54,132
|
|
43,389
|
|
|||||
|
Lease expense, including straight-line rent
|
19,332
|
|
24,596
|
|
21,859
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
619
|
|
699
|
|
539
|
|
|||||
|
Net Loss
|
$
|
(1,423
|
)
|
$
|
(2,078
|
)
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
||
The net loss in OpCo for 2016 is primarily attributable to
$619,000
in depreciation expense and
$645,000
in excess expenses over revenues from the pre-opening and lease-up of three newly-constructed facilities opened during 2016.
31
Investment Highlights
Since January 1,
2016
, we have made or announced the following real estate and note investments
($ in thousands)
:
|
Properties
|
Asset Class
|
Amount
|
||||||
|
Lease Investments
|
||||||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
1
|
SHO
|
$
|
74,000
|
|
|||
|
Chancellor Health Care
|
2
|
SHO
|
36,650
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
5
|
SHO
|
89,900
|
|
||||
|
Watermark Retirement / East Lake Capital Mgmt.
|
2
|
SHO
|
66,300
|
|
||||
|
The Ensign Group
|
8
|
SNF
|
118,500
|
|
||||
|
Marathon/Village Concepts
|
1
|
SHO
|
9,813
|
|
||||
|
Note Investments
|
||||||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
1
|
SHO
|
14,000
|
|
||||
|
Senior Living Management
|
5
|
SHO
|
24,500
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
1
|
SHO
|
14,000
|
|
||||
|
$
|
447,663
|
|
||||||
Senior Living Communities
On November 8, 2016, we acquired Evergreen Woods, a 299-unit entrance-fee community in Connecticut, for $74,000,000 in cash, inclusive of a $3,708,000 regulatory deposit. The facility was added to our existing master lease with Senior Living at the existing lease rate of 6.77%, subject to 4% escalation in January 2017 and 2018 and 3% annually thereafter with an initial term of 13 years, plus renewal options. Because Evergreen Woods was previously owner-operated, we accounted for our purchase of the property as an asset acquisition. As part of this transaction, we allocated
$7,724,000
of the purchase price to the relative fair value of the land and
$62,568,000
to the relative fair value of building and improvements.
In March 2016, we extended mezzanine loans of $12,000,000 and $2,000,000 to affiliates of Senior Living to partially fund construction of a 186-unit senior living campus on Daniel Island in North Carolina. The loans, which are payable monthly, bear interest at 10% per annum and mature in March 2021. The loans, having a total balance of
$10,778,000
at
December 31, 2016
, are in addition to the $15,000,000 revolving line of credit we provided Senior Living in connection with our 2014 lease of 8 retirement communities.
Chancellor
On August 31, 2016, we acquired two facilities consisting of a senior living campus and a memory-care facility in McMinnville, Oregon, for $36,650,000 in cash inclusive of closing costs of $150,000. We leased the facilities to Chancellor Health Care for an initial lease term of 15 years, with renewal options, at an initial annual lease rate of 7.5% plus annual escalators. Because the facilities were owner-occupied, the acquisition was accounted for as an asset purchase.
Senior Living Management
On August 3, 2016, we entered into an agreement to furnish through its corporate entity and affiliates our current tenant, Senior Living Management (“SLM”), Inc., with loans of up to $24,500,000 to facilitate SLM’s acquisition of five senior housing facilities that it currently operates. The loans consist of two notes under a master credit agreement, include both a mortgage and a corporate loan, and bear interest at 8.25% with terms of five years, plus optional one and two-year extensions. NHI has a right of first refusal if SLM elects to sell one or more of the facilities. A total of
$12,556,000
had been drawn on the two loans as of December 31, 2016. On January 17, 2017, the remaining amount under the loans was drawn.
Bickford
On July 15, 2016, NHI extended a $14,000,000 construction loan facility to Bickford for the purpose of developing and operating an assisted living/memory care community in Illinois. The total amount funded as of
December 31, 2016
was
$2,413,000
, interest is to accrue at 9%, and the loan is to mature on July 15, 2021. The promissory note is secured by a first mortgage lien on substantially all real and personal property as well as a pledge of any and all leases or agreements which may grant a right of use to the subject property. Usual and customary covenants extend to the agreement, including the borrower’s obligation for payment of insurance and taxes. The loan and subject property were not included in the joint venture between the parties.
32
On June 1, 2016, in an asset acquisition, we acquired
five
assisted living and memory care facilities owned and operated by Bickford for
$87,500,000
, including
$77,747,000
in cash and cancellation of notes and accrued interest receivable totaling
$9,753,000
. Additionally, we have committed
$2,400,000
for capital improvements and expansion of the existing facilities, the funding of which will be added to the lease base. The lease provides for an initial rate of
7.25%
and term of
15
years plus
two
five
-year renewal options. The annual lease escalator is
3%
. NHI’s purchase option on an additional Bickford facility was relinquished. The facilities, consisting of
277
total units, are located in Iowa (
2
), Missouri, Illinois, and Nebraska. The facilities were not included in the RIDEA joint venture between the parties.
Watermark Retirement / East Lake Capital
On June 1, 2016, NHI acquired two entrance fee continuing care retirement communities (“CCRCs”) from funds managed by certain affiliates of East Lake Capital Management (“East Lake”) for
$56,300,000
in cash, inclusive of a
$4,500,000
regulatory deposit, and entered into a lease transaction with affiliates of East Lake. NHI has committed up to an additional
$10,000,000
for capital improvements and potential expansion of the communities over the next two years, of which
$3,450,000
was drawn at
December 31, 2016
. The CCRCs consist of 460 units and are located in Bridgeport and Southbury, Connecticut. The communities are sub-leased to affiliates of Watermark Retirement Communities (“Watermark”), the current manager. The lease has a term of 15 years, with an initial lease rate to East Lake of 7% on our total investment with escalators of 3.5% in years two through four, and 3% annually thereafter.
In conjunction with the lease, East Lake acquired a purchase option on the properties as a whole, exercisable beginning in year
six
of the lease. The option will be based on our initial acquisition cost, our funding of capital improvements and expansions, other additional funding that may then be in place, or further rent escalations during the remaining duration of the option window.
Ensign Group
On April 1, 2016, we purchased
eight
skilled nursing facilities totaling
931
beds in Texas for
$118,500,000
in cash. The facilities were owned and operated by NHI’s existing tenant, Legend Healthcare (“Legend”), and we accounted for the purchase as an asset acquisition. Concurrent with the acquisition, we amended in-place leases covering the
nine
other skilled nursing facilities we leased to Legend, extending their provisions to the new facilities. The amendment also replaced purchase options that provided for equal sharing of any appreciation in value, within a specified range, with purchase options having a price determined at fair value, exercisable at the end of the lease term. Based on our analysis of the in-place rights, benefits and obligations, approximately $6,400,000 of the consideration in the acquisition from Legend was allocated to canceled provisions related to the in-place leases.
Legend elected to transition its skilled nursing operations to a new operator on May 1, 2016, and NHI entered into a new
15
-year master lease with affiliates of The Ensign Group, Inc. (“Ensign” NASDAQ: ENSG) on
15
of the former Legend facilities for an initial annual amount of
$17,750,000
, plus an annual escalator based on inflation. NHI’s total original investment in the
15
facilities leased to Ensign is approximately
$211,000,000
. The lease has
two
5
-year renewal options. Upon entering the new lease, NHI agreed to sell
two
existing skilled nursing facilities previously under lease to Legend in Texas totaling
245
beds to Ensign for
$24,600,000
. The Ensign lease, secured in part by the operator’s corporate guaranty, replaces the amended Legend lease, and, accordingly, the rights, benefits and obligations held by Legend have terminated.
As part of this transaction, NHI is committed to purchase, from a developer,
four
new skilled nursing facilities in Texas for
$56,000,000
which are leased to Legend and subleased to Ensign. The purchase window for the first facility is open through February 2017. The other three facilities are under construction by the developer.
Marathon/Village Concepts
On January 15, 2016, we acquired a
98
-unit independent living community in Chehalis, Washington, for
$9,463,000
in cash inclusive of closing costs of
$213,000
plus an additional commitment to fund
$350,000
in specified capital improvements. We leased the facility to a partnership between Marathon Development and Village Concepts Retirement Communities for an initial lease term of
15 years
. The lease provides for an initial annual lease rate of
7.25%
plus annual escalators. Because the facility was owner-occupied, the acquisition was accounted for as an asset purchase.
Real Estate and Mortgage Write-downs
Our borrowers and tenants experience periods of significant financial pressures and difficulties similar to other health care providers. Governments at both the federal and state levels have enacted legislation to lower, or at least slow, the growth in payments to health care providers. Furthermore, the cost of professional liability insurance has increased significantly during this same period. Since inception, a number of our facility operators and mortgage loan borrowers have undergone bankruptcy. Others have
33
been forced to surrender properties to us in lieu of foreclosure or, for certain periods, have failed to make timely payments on their obligations to us.
We believe that the carrying amounts of our real estate properties are recoverable and that mortgage notes receivable are realizable and supported by the value of the underlying collateral. However, it is possible that future events could require us to make significant adjustments to these carrying amounts. In recording the transition of our leases from Legend to Ensign in May 2016, we wrote off the $6,400,000 fair value assigned to the former Legend leases and $8,326,000 of accumulated straight-line rent receivable. Another $1,131,000 of accumulated straight-line receivables were written off in the preparation for transition to a new tenant in in the 126-unit portfolio mentioned under “Other Portfolio Activity” below.
The above write-offs have been classified among operating expenses as “Loan and realty losses (recoveries)” in our accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The losses are non-cash, transactional in nature, and relate to accounting conventions governing the recording of leases when a new lessee replaces a former lessee. Because these items may create some difficulty in comparing the current period to similar prior periods, we have adjusted their effect in our presentation of normalized non-GAAP financial measures.
Potential Effects of Medicare Reimbursement
Our tenants who operate SNFs receive a significant portion of their revenues from governmental payors, primarily Medicare (federal) and Medicaid (states). Changes in reimbursement rates and limits on the scope of services reimbursed to skilled nursing facilities could have a material impact on the operators’ liquidity and financial condition. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) released a rule outlining a 1.6% increase in their Medicare reimbursement for fiscal year 2017 beginning on October 1, 2016. We currently estimate that our borrowers and lessees will be able to withstand this nominal Medicare increase due to their credit quality, profitability and their debt or lease coverage ratios, although no assurances can be given as to what the ultimate effect that similar Medicare increases on an annual basis would have on each of our borrowers and lessees. According to industry studies, state Medicaid funding is not expected to keep pace with inflation. Federal legislative policies have been adopted and continue to be proposed that would reduce Medicare and/or Medicaid payments to SNFs. Any near-term acquisitions of skilled nursing facilities are planned on a selective basis, with emphasis on operator quality and newer construction.
Other Portfolio Activity
Our leases are typically structured as “triple net leases” on single-tenant properties having an initial leasehold term of 10 to 15 years with one or more 5-year renewal options. As such, there may be reporting periods in which we experience few, if any, lease renewals or expirations. During the
year ended
December 31, 2016
, we did not have any renewing or expiring leases.
In October 2016, as a result of material noncompliance with lease terms, we began exploratory measures to effect either transitioning the lease of a
126
-unit assisted living portfolio from the current tenant or the marketing of the underlying properties. Either of these courses of action result in recording a reserve, for accounting purposes, at
December 31, 2016
, of
$1,131,000
related to straight-line rent receivables and cessation of straight-line rent recognition. While straight-line receivables represent the effects of recognizing past and future escalations under terms of the lease using the straight-line method, we anticipate full recovery of all amounts billed to date under the lease. We have made no provision for any legal or other costs associated with the transition, as these amounts are neither estimable nor, in the opinion of management, material to our financial position or results of operations. Of our total revenues,
$2,411,000
,
$2,497,000
and
$2,604,000
were recognized as rental income from the portfolio for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively.
In January 2016 we received full payment from an affiliate of our current lessee, Discovery Senior Living, on a $2,500,000 second mortgage loan we originally provided in October 2013 for the construction of a senior housing community in Naples, Florida. In November 2016 two mortgage loans on SNF properties in Virginia, carrying a total balance of $4,685,000, were paid in full.
Most of our existing leases contain annual escalators in rent payments. For financial statement purposes, rental income with fixed contractual escalations is ordinarily recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Certain of our operators hold purchase options allowing them to acquire properties they currently lease from NHI. For options open or coming open in 2017, we are engaged in preliminary negotiations to continue as lessor or in some other capacity. A summary of these tenant options to purchase senior housing communities, hospitals, medical office buildings and skilled nursing facilities is presented below:
34
|
Asset
|
Number of
|
Lease
|
1st Option
|
Current
|
||
|
Type
|
Facilities
|
Expiration
|
Open Year
|
Cash Rent
|
||
|
MOB
|
1
|
February 2018
|
Open
|
$
|
704,000
|
|
|
HOSP
|
1
|
September 2027
|
2018
|
$
|
2,248,000
|
|
|
SHO
|
8
|
December 2024
|
2020
|
$
|
3,984,000
|
|
|
HOSP
|
1
|
March 2025
|
2020
|
$
|
1,778,000
|
|
|
SHO
|
3
|
June 2025
|
2020
|
$
|
4,775,000
|
|
|
SHO
|
2
|
May 2031
|
2021
|
$
|
4,004,000
|
|
|
HOSP
|
1
|
June 2022
|
2022
|
$
|
3,358,000
|
|
|
Various
|
8
|
—
|
Thereafter
|
$
|
4,016,000
|
|
When present, tenant purchase options generally give the lessee an option to purchase the underlying property for consideration determined by i) a sliding base dependent upon the extent of appreciation in the property plus a specified proportion of any appreciation; ii) our acquisition costs plus a specified proportion of any appreciation; iii) an agreed capitalization rate applied to the current rental; or iv) our acquisition costs plus a profit floor plus a specified proportion of any appreciation.
Timber Ridge
In February 2015, we entered into an agreement to lend up to
$154,500,000
to LCS-Westminster Partnership III LLP (“LCS-WP”), an affiliate of Life Care Services (“LCS”) . The loan agreement conveys a mortgage interest and will facilitate the construction of Phase II of Timber Ridge at Talus (“Timber Ridge”), a Type-A Continuing Care Retirement Community in Issaquah, WA managed by LCS.
The loan takes the form of
two
notes under a master credit agreement. The senior note (“Note A”) totals
$60,000,000
at a
6.75%
interest rate with
10
basis-point escalators after year
three
, and has a term of
10
years. We have funded
$42,944,000
of Note A as of
December 31, 2016
. Note A is interest-only and is locked to prepayment for
three
years. After year three, the prepayment penalty starts at
5%
and declines
1%
per year. The second note (“Note B”) is a construction loan for up to
$94,500,000
at an annual interest rate of
8%
and a
five
-year maturity and was fully funded as of
December 31, 2016
. We expect substantial repayment with new resident entrance fees from the opening of Phase II in October, 2016. Repayment of Note B amounted to
$61,289,000
as of December 31, 2016, plus an additional
$7,304,000
through February 15, 2017.
NHI has a purchase option on the entire Timber Ridge property for the greater of fair market value or
$115,000,000
during a purchase option window of
120 days
that will contingently open in year
five
or upon earlier stabilization of the development, as defined. The current basis of our investment in Timber Ridge loans, net of unamortized commitment fees, is
$75,112,000
, but we are obligated to complete the funding of Note A up to
$60,000,000
.
35
Results of Operations
The significant items affecting revenues and expenses are described below (
in thousands
):
|
Years ended December 31,
|
Period Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
$
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Rental income
|
||||||||||||||
|
15 SNFs leased to Ensign Group transitioned from Legend
|
15,660
|
|
9,394
|
|
6,266
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
ALFs leased to Bickford
|
29,874
|
|
23,853
|
|
6,021
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
1 ALF and 2 SLCs leased to East Lake Capital Management
|
7,110
|
|
2,342
|
|
4,768
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
8 EFCs and 1 SLC leased to Senior Living Communities
|
32,964
|
|
31,000
|
|
1,964
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
ALFs leased to Chancellor Health Care
|
5,558
|
|
3,738
|
|
1,820
|
|
48.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
ILFs leased to an affiliate of Holiday Retirement
|
34,852
|
|
33,351
|
|
1,501
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
SNFs leased to Fundamental Long Term Care
1
|
2,682
|
|
5,416
|
|
(2,734
|
)
|
(50.5
|
)%
|
||||||
|
2 SNFs leased to Legend
2
|
993
|
|
3,127
|
|
(2,134
|
)
|
(68.2
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Other new and existing leases
|
80,502
|
|
77,603
|
|
2,899
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
210,195
|
|
189,824
|
|
20,371
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Straight-line rent adjustments, new and existing leases
|
22,198
|
|
24,623
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
(9.8
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total Rental Income
|
232,393
|
|
214,447
|
|
17,946
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest income from mortgage and other notes
|
||||||||||||||
|
Timber Ridge
|
7,976
|
|
3,569
|
|
4,407
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
976
|
|
411
|
|
565
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Mortgage and other notes paid off during the period
|
556
|
|
2,189
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
(74.6
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Other new and existing mortgages
|
4,297
|
|
4,037
|
|
260
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total Interest Income from Mortgage and Other Notes
|
13,805
|
|
10,206
|
|
3,599
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Investment income and other
|
2,302
|
|
4,335
|
|
(2,033
|
)
|
(46.9
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total Revenue
|
248,500
|
|
228,988
|
|
19,512
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
||||||||||||||
|
1 ALF, 2 SLCs and 2 EFCs leased to East Lake Capital
|
2,495
|
|
889
|
|
1,606
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
15 SNFs leased to Ensign Group transitioned from Legend
|
4,487
|
|
2,102
|
|
2,385
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
ALFs operated by Bickford Senior Living
|
9,783
|
|
7,669
|
|
2,114
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
ALFs leased to Chancellor Health Care
|
1,767
|
|
1,104
|
|
663
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other new and existing assets
|
41,033
|
|
41,399
|
|
(366
|
)
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total Depreciation
|
59,565
|
|
53,163
|
|
6,402
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts
|
43,108
|
|
37,629
|
|
5,479
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Payroll and related compensation expenses
|
4,272
|
|
4,375
|
|
(103
|
)
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Compliance, consulting and professional fees
|
3,048
|
|
3,292
|
|
(244
|
)
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Non-cash share-based compensation expense
|
1,732
|
|
2,134
|
|
(402
|
)
|
(18.8
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Loan and realty losses (recoveries)
|
15,856
|
|
(491
|
)
|
16,347
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Other expenses
|
2,152
|
|
2,167
|
|
(15
|
)
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
||||||
|
129,733
|
|
102,269
|
|
27,464
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Income before equity-method investee, income tax benefit (expense),
|
||||||||||||||
|
investment and other gains and noncontrolling interest
|
118,767
|
|
126,719
|
|
(7,952
|
)
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Loss from equity-method investee
|
(1,214
|
)
|
(1,767
|
)
|
553
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
(749
|
)
|
707
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Investment and other gains
|
35,912
|
|
24,655
|
|
11,257
|
|
45.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
152,716
|
|
150,314
|
|
2,402
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(1,176
|
)
|
(1,452
|
)
|
276
|
|
(19.0
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
151,540
|
|
$
|
148,862
|
|
$
|
2,678
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|||
|
NM - not meaningful
|
||||||||||||||
|
1
2015 includes two Texas SNFs disposed April 2016
|
||||||||||||||
|
2
Disposed May 2016
|
||||||||||||||
36
Financial highlights of the year ended
December 31, 2016
, compared to
2015
were as follows:
|
•
|
Rental income increased
$17,946,000
, or
8.4%
, primarily as a result of new investments funded in 2015 and 2016. The increase in rental income included a
$2,425,000
decrease in straight-line rent adjustments. Generally accepted accounting principles require rental income to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease to give effect to scheduled rent escalators that are determinable at lease inception. Generally, future increases in rental income depend on our ability to make new investments which meet our underwriting criteria.
|
|
•
|
Interest income from mortgage and other notes increased
$3,599,000
primarily due to advances made on our mortgage and construction loan commitment to the Timber Ridge entrance fee community as described in Investment Highlights, partially offset by lower interest income from notes paid off during 2016. We expect total interest income from our loan portfolio to decrease as repayments of our $94,500,000 construction loan to Timber Ridge began in October 2016 and we expect the loan to be substantially repaid during 2017. Repayments amounted to
$61,289,000
as of December 31, 2016, plus an additional
$7,304,000
through February 15, 2017.
|
|
•
|
Interest income from our loan portfolio is also subject to decrease due to normal maturities, scheduled principal amortization and early payoffs of individual loans.
|
|
•
|
Investment income decreased primarily due to our decision to sell 1,043,800 shares of LTC, Inc. common stock.
|
|
•
|
Depreciation expense increased
$6,402,000
primarily due to new real estate investments completed during 2015 and 2016.
|
|
•
|
Interest expense, including amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts, increased
$5,479,000
primarily as a result of the timing and amount of new borrowings and our strategic focus to refinance short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility at variable interest rates with long-term debt at fixed rates. This strategy helps to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates and locks in the investment spread between our lease revenue and our cost of debt capital.
|
|
•
|
Loan and realty losses of
$15,856,000
relate to non-cash transactional write-offs involving the acquisition of eight skilled nursing facilities from Legend and transition of a total of 15 SNF leases to Ensign in the second quarter of 2016, and the non-cash write-off of straight-line rent receivable during the third quarter of 2016 resulting from a tenant’s material non-compliance with our lease terms and our planned transition to another tenant or to market the properties.
|
|
•
|
The loss from equity method investee of
$1,214,000
reflects our pro rata portion of the investee’s net loss for 2016 as described earlier in our discussion of our joint venture with a Bickford affiliate which was terminated on September 30, 2016.
|
|
•
|
Investment and other gains includes
$29,673,000
from the sale of marketable securities,
$2,805,000
from the sale of two Texas skilled nursing facilities in May 2016,
$1,654,000
from the sale of an Idaho skilled nursing facility in March 2016,
$123,000
from the sale of a vacant land parcel in Alabama and
$1,657,000
recorded as a gain on the sale of our 85% non-controlling interest in OpCo.
|
37
The significant items affecting revenues and expenses are described below (
in thousands
):
|
Years ended December 31,
|
Period Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
$
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Rental income
|
||||||||||||||
|
7 EFCs and 1 SLC leased to Senior Living Communities
|
$
|
31,000
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
$
|
29,794
|
|
NM
|
|
|||
|
ALFs leased to RIDEA joint venture with Bickford
|
23,853
|
|
20,946
|
|
2,907
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
1 ALF and 2 SLCs leased to East Lake Capital Management
|
2,342
|
|
—
|
|
2,342
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
ILFs leased to an affiliate of Holiday Retirement
|
33,351
|
|
31,915
|
|
1,436
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
ALFs leased to Chancellor Health Care
|
3,738
|
|
2,489
|
|
1,249
|
|
50.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
3 SNFs and 1 ALF leased to Prestige Senior Living
|
3,581
|
|
2,544
|
|
1,037
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
ALFs leased to Brookdale Senior Living
|
5,059
|
|
4,912
|
|
147
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other new and existing leases
|
86,900
|
|
85,803
|
|
1,097
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
189,824
|
|
149,815
|
|
40,009
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Straight-line rent adjustments, new and existing leases
|
24,623
|
|
16,464
|
|
8,159
|
|
49.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total Rental Income
|
214,447
|
|
166,279
|
|
48,168
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest income from mortgage and other notes
|
||||||||||||||
|
Timber Ridge
|
3,569
|
|
—
|
|
3,569
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Senior Living Communities construction loan
|
411
|
|
7
|
|
404
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Sycamore Street (Bickford affiliate)
|
1,161
|
|
1,137
|
|
24
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Sante Mesa
|
574
|
|
1,203
|
|
(629
|
)
|
(52.3
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Other new and existing mortgages
|
4,263
|
|
4,666
|
|
(403
|
)
|
(8.6
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total Interest Income from Mortgage and Other Notes
|
9,978
|
|
7,013
|
|
2,965
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Investment income and other
|
4,563
|
|
4,217
|
|
346
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total Revenue
|
228,988
|
|
177,509
|
|
51,479
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
||||||
|
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
||||||||||||||
|
7 EFCs and 1 SLC leased to Senior Living Communities
|
12,530
|
|
—
|
|
12,530
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
ALFs leased to RIDEA joint venture with Bickford
|
7,669
|
|
6,680
|
|
989
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
1 ALF and 2 SLCs leased to East Lake Capital Management
|
889
|
|
—
|
|
889
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
3 SNFs and 1 ALF leased to Prestige Senior Living
|
1,244
|
|
892
|
|
352
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
ALFs leased to Chancellor Health Care
|
1,104
|
|
739
|
|
365
|
|
49.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other new and existing assets
|
29,727
|
|
29,767
|
|
(40
|
)
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total Depreciation
|
53,163
|
|
38,078
|
|
15,085
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
37,629
|
|
24,227
|
|
13,402
|
|
55.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Debt issuance costs expensed due to credit facility modifications
|
—
|
|
2,145
|
|
(2,145
|
)
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Legal
|
464
|
|
209
|
|
255
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Franchise, excise and other taxes
|
985
|
|
620
|
|
365
|
|
58.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Payroll and related compensation expenses
|
4,375
|
|
4,546
|
|
(171
|
)
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Dues, marketing and professional fees
|
3,292
|
|
1,812
|
|
1,480
|
|
81.7
|
%
|
||||||
|
Non-cash compensation expense
|
2,134
|
|
2,020
|
|
114
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Loan recoveries, net
|
(491
|
)
|
—
|
|
(491
|
)
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Other expenses
|
718
|
|
729
|
|
(11
|
)
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
||||||
|
102,269
|
|
74,386
|
|
27,883
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Income before equity-method investee, income tax benefit (expense),
|
||||||||||||||
|
investment and other gains and noncontrolling interest
|
126,719
|
|
103,123
|
|
23,596
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Income (loss) from equity-method investee
|
(1,767
|
)
|
(71
|
)
|
(1,696
|
)
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Income tax benefit of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
707
|
|
—
|
|
707
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Investment and other gains
|
24,655
|
|
—
|
|
24,655
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
150,314
|
|
103,052
|
|
47,262
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(1,452
|
)
|
(1,443
|
)
|
(9
|
)
|
NM
|
|
||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
148,862
|
|
$
|
101,609
|
|
$
|
47,253
|
|
46.5
|
%
|
|||
|
NM - not meaningful
|
||||||||||||||
38
Financial highlights of the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to 2014 were as follows:
|
•
|
Rental income increased $48,168,000 due primarily to our SLC acquisition in December 2014 and other real estate investments completed during 2014 and 2015. During 2015 we completed $155,575,000 of new real estate investments. During 2014, we completed $555,453,000 of new real estate investments. The increase in rental income included an $8,159,000 increase in straight-line rent adjustments. Generally accepted accounting principles require rental income to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease to give effect to scheduled rent escalators. Future increases in rental income depend on our ability to make new investments which meet our underwriting criteria.
|
|
•
|
Interest income from mortgage and other notes increased $2,965,000 primarily due to borrowings of $83,411,000 on our new loan commitment to the Timber Ridge entrance fee community as described in Investment Highlights. We expect total interest income from our loan portfolio to increase as we continue to fund these loans to Timber Ridge on a monthly basis throughout 2016. Repayment of our construction loan of $94,500,000 to Timber Ridge began during October 2016. Interest income from our loan portfolio is subject to decrease due to normal maturities, scheduled principal amortization and early payoffs of individual loans.
|
|
•
|
Depreciation expense increased $15,085,000 compared to the prior year primarily due to new real estate investments completed during 2014 and 2015.
|
|
•
|
Interest expense, including amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts, increased $13,402,000 primarily as a result of the timing and amount of new borrowings and our strategic focus to refinance short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility at variable interest rates with long-term debt at fixed rates. This strategy helps to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates and locks in the investment spread between our lease revenue and our cost of debt capital.
|
|
•
|
Dues, marketing and professional fees have increased as a result of (a) marketing and promotional expenses incurred as NHI continues to participate actively in industry groups and in expanding its awareness among owners and operators in the asset classes in which it makes investments and (b) the professional fees associated with the volume of new investments and new financing arrangements during 2015.
|
|
•
|
We received $491,000 as a secured creditor in the final settlement of a bankruptcy proceeding involving one of our former borrowers. The loan had previously been written off. We recorded the receipt as a loan recovery.
|
|
•
|
The loss from equity method investee of $1,767,000 reflects our pro rata portion of the investee’s net loss for 2015 as described earlier in our discussion of our joint venture with Sycamore Street.
|
|
•
|
Investment and other gains for 2015 represent gains of $23,529,000 on the sales of marketable securities and a gain of $1,126,000 on the sale of two properties to our tenant Fundamental.
|
39
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Funds
Our primary sources of cash include rent payments, principal and interest payments on mortgage and other notes receivable, interest and dividends received on our marketable securities, proceeds from the sales of real property, net proceeds from offerings of equity securities and borrowings from our term loans and revolving credit facility. Our primary uses of cash include debt service payments (both principal and interest), new investments in real estate and notes, dividend distributions to our shareholders and general corporate overhead.
These sources and uses of cash are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as summarized below
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
Year Ended
|
One Year Change
|
Year Ended
|
One Year Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
12/31/2016
|
12/31/2015
|
$
|
%
|
12/31/14
|
$
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$
|
13,286
|
|
$
|
3,287
|
|
$
|
9,999
|
|
NM
|
|
11,312
|
|
$
|
(8,025
|
)
|
(70.9
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
177,219
|
|
164,425
|
|
12,794
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
126,143
|
|
38,282
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(329,838
|
)
|
(136,326
|
)
|
(193,512
|
)
|
NM
|
|
(540,316
|
)
|
403,990
|
|
(74.8
|
)%
|
||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
144,165
|
|
(18,100
|
)
|
162,265
|
|
NM
|
|
406,148
|
|
(424,248
|
)
|
(104.5
|
)%
|
||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
4,832
|
|
$
|
13,286
|
|
$
|
(8,454
|
)
|
(63.6
|
)%
|
3,287
|
|
$
|
9,999
|
|
NM
|
|
||||||
Operating Activities –
Net cash provided by operating activities for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
increased primarily as a result of the collection of lease and interest payments on new real estate investments completed during 2015 and 2016.
Investing Activities –
Net cash flows used in investing activities for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
increased primarily due to
$486,788,000
of investments in real estate and notes which were partially offset by collection of notes receivable, sales of marketable securities and certain real estate assets.
Financing Activities –
The change in net cash related to financing activities for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
compared to the same period in 2015 is primarily the result of borrowings on our revolving credit facility,
$75,000,000
in unsecured debt from a private placement lender and
$104,190,000
in proceeds from stock issuances. These capital sources were partially offset by dividends paid to stockholders which increased
$13,646,000
over the same period in 2015 due to a
5.9%
increase in our per share dividend and the issuance of additional common shares during 2016.
Liquidity
At
December 31, 2016
, our liquidity was strong, with
$396,832,000
available in cash and borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facility.
Our ATM program, discussed below, and our investment in marketable securities, carried at fair value of approximately
$11,745,000
at
December 31, 2016
, represent additional sources of liquidity. Traditionally, debt financing and cash resulting from operating and financing activities, which are derived from proceeds of lease and mortgage collections, loan payoffs and the recovery of previous write-downs, have been used to satisfy our operational and investing needs and to provide a return to our shareholders. Those operational and investing needs reflect the resources necessary to maintain and cultivate our funding sources and have generally fallen into three categories: debt service, REIT operating expenses, and new real estate investments.
In June 2015, we entered into an amended $800,000,000 senior unsecured credit facility with a group of banks. The facility can be expanded, subject to certain conditions, up to an additional
$250,000,000
. The amended credit facility provides for: (1) a $550,000,000 revolving credit facility that matures in June 2020 (inclusive of an embedded 1-year extension option) with interest at 150 basis points over 30-day LIBOR (
77
bps at
December 31, 2016
); (2) an existing $130,000,000 term loan that matures in June 2020 with interest at 175 basis points over LIBOR of which interest of 3.91% is fixed with an interest rate swap agreement; and (3) two existing term loans which also remain in place totaling $120,000,000, maturing in June 2020 and bearing interest at 175 basis points over LIBOR,with a notional amount of $40,000,000 being fixed at 3.29% until 2019 and $80,000,000 being fixed at 3.86% until 2020.
At
December 31, 2016
, we had
$392,000,000
available to draw on the revolving portion of the credit facility. The unused commitment fee is 40 basis points per annum. The unsecured credit facility requires that we maintain certain financial ratios within limits set by our creditors. To date, these ratios, which are calculated quarterly, have been within the limits required by the credit facility agreements.
40
We began liquidating our position in LTC Properties, Inc. (“LTC”) common stock in the fourth quarter of 2015. In 2016, we sold 1,043,800 shares in a further reduction of our LTC holdings, realizing net proceeds of $49,022,000 from these sales. In addition, we realized $17,048,000 in proceeds from sales of marketable debt securities held at amortized cost. A taxable gain of approximately
$29,673,000
resulting therefrom is expected to be adequately offset by depreciation and other deductions in the calculation of our REIT taxable income, making all of the proceeds available for deployment. We held 250,000 shares of LTC common shares as of December 31, 2016.
In June 2016, we completed an at-the market (“ATM”) equity offering. With a weighted average price for shares sold of $71.30, we issued 714,666 common shares resulting in net proceeds of $50,189,000, which we used to pay down our revolving credit facility. We sold additional shares under our ATM program beginning in August 2016 to provide ratable equity funding for our third quarter investments and in anticipation of our Evergreen acquisition announced November 3, 2016. We obtained an weighted average price for shares sold of $80.51, in issuing 680,976 common shares, resulting in net proceeds of $54,001,000.
The use of funds from our ATM and the sales of LTC common stock effected a rebalancing of our leverage in response to our year-to-date acquisitions and keeps our options flexible for further expansion. We continue to explore various other funding sources including bank term loans, convertible debt, traditional equity placement, unsecured bonds and senior notes, debt private placement and secured government agency financing. We view our ATM program as an effective way to match-fund our smaller acquisitions by exercising control over the timing and size of transactions and achieving a more favorable cost of capital as compared to larger follow-on offerings.
We expect that borrowings on our revolving credit facility, borrowings on term loans, liquidation of our marketable securities and our ATM program will allow us to continue to make real estate investments during 2017.
We intend to use the net proceeds from the ATM program for general corporate purposes, which may include future acquisitions and repayment of indebtedness, including borrowings under our credit facility. The ATM offerings have been made pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated February 17, 2015 and a related prospectus dated March 18, 2014, which constitute a part of NHI’s effective shelf registration statement that was previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We expect to file a new registration statement and commence a new ATM program in first quarter 2017.
To mitigate our exposure to interest rate risk, we have entered into the following interest rate swap contracts on three of our term loans as of
December 31, 2016
(
dollars in thousands
):
|
Date Entered
|
Maturity Date
|
Fixed Rate
|
Rate Index
|
Notional Amount
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||
|
May 2012
|
April 2019
|
3.29%
|
1-month LIBOR
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
$
|
(187
|
)
|
|||||
|
June 2013
|
June 2020
|
3.86%
|
1-month LIBOR
|
$
|
80,000
|
|
$
|
(1,479
|
)
|
|||||
|
March 2014
|
June 2020
|
3.91%
|
1-month LIBOR
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
$
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|||||
For instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), and reclassified into earnings in the same period, or periods, during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings. Hedge ineffectiveness related to our cash flow hedges, which is reported in current period earnings as interest expense, was not significant for the three years ended December 31, 2016.
We periodically refinance the borrowings on our revolving credit facility through the ATM and longer-term debt instruments. We consider secured debt from U.S. Govt. agencies, including HUD, private placements of unsecured debt, and public offerings of debt and equity. We anticipate that our historically low cost of debt capital will rise in the near to mid-term, as the federal government continues its upward transitioning of the Federal funds rate.
If we modify or replace existing debt, we would incur debt issuance costs. These fees would be subject to amortization over the term of the new debt instrument and may result in the write-off of fees associated with debt which has been replaced or modified. Sustaining long-term dividend growth will require that we consider all forms of capital mentioned above, with the goal of maintaining a low-leverage balance sheet as mitigation against potential adverse changes in the business of our tenants and borrowers.
We intend to comply with REIT dividend requirements that we distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income for the year ending
December 31, 2016
and thereafter. Dividends declared for the fourth quarter of each fiscal year are paid by the end of the following January and are, with some exceptions, treated for tax purposes as having been paid in the fiscal year just ended
41
as provided in IRS Code Sec. 857(b)(8). We declare special dividends when we compute our REIT taxable income in an amount that exceeds our regular dividends for the fiscal year.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently have no outstanding guarantees. For additional information on our letter of credit with Sycamore, an affiliate of Bickford, see our discussion in this section under Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities below. Our loans to LCS-WP and our lease with East Lake represent variable interests in those enterprises. However, because we do not control these entities, nor do we have any role in their day-to-day management, we are not their primary beneficiary. Except as discussed below under Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities, we have no further material obligations arising from our transactions with these entities, and we believe our maximum exposure to loss at
December 31, 2016
, due to this involvement would be limited to our contractual commitments and contingent liabilities and the amount of our current investments with them, as detailed further in Notes 4 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements.
In March 2014 we issued $200,000,000 of convertible bonds, the conversion feature being intended to broaden the Company’s credit profile and as a means to obtain a more favorable coupon rate. For this feature we calculate the dilutive effect using market prices prevailing over the reporting period. Because the dilution calculation is market-driven, and per share guidance we provide is based on diluted amounts, the theoretical effects of the conversion feature result in per share unpredictability.
Additional disclosure requirements also give widely ranging results depending on market price variability. The bonds will be freely convertible in the last six months of their contractual life, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2020; however, generally accepted accounting principles require us to periodically report the amount by which the bonds’ convertible value exceeds their principal amount, without regard to the current availability of the conversion feature. Further, the mechanics of the calculation require the use of an end-of-period stock price, so that using that amount at December 31, 2016, delivers an excess of $9,137,000, whereas the use of another price point would give a different result.
The conversion feature is generally available to the bondholders entering the last six months of the bonds’ term but may also become actionable if the market price of NHI’s common stock should, for 20 of 30 consecutive trading days within a calendar quarter, sustain a level in excess of 130% of the adjusted
conversion price. The bonds are “optional net-share settlement” instruments, meaning that NHI has the ability and intent to settle the principal amount of the indebtedness in cash, with possible dilutive share issuances for any excess, at NHI’s option. While retaining the option to settle the excess of the bond conversion value over their face amount in cash, management believes that, for a company with a market cap of approximately $3 billion, the potential issuance of approximately $9 million of additional shares (measured as of December 31, 2016) is minimally dilutive.
Contractual Obligations
As of
December 31, 2016
, our contractual payment obligations were as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
Total
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Debt, including interest
1
|
$
|
1,440,669
|
|
$
|
43,340
|
|
$
|
129,989
|
|
$
|
689,431
|
|
$
|
577,909
|
|
||||
|
Real estate purchase liabilities
|
56,000
|
|
14,000
|
|
42,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Construction commitments
|
16,853
|
|
16,853
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Loan commitments
|
53,948
|
|
53,948
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
$
|
1,567,470
|
|
$
|
128,141
|
|
$
|
171,989
|
|
$
|
689,431
|
|
$
|
577,909
|
|
|||||
1
Interest is calculated based on the weighted average interest rate of outstanding debt balances as of
December 31, 2016
. The calculation also includes an unused commitment fee of
.40%
.
Commitments and Contingencies
The following tables summarize information as of
December 31, 2016
related to our outstanding commitments and contingencies which are more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
42
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Loan Commitments:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Life Care Services Note A
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
$
|
60,000,000
|
|
$
|
(42,944,000
|
)
|
$
|
17,056,000
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
14,000,000
|
|
(2,413,000
|
)
|
11,587,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
SHO
|
Revolving Credit
|
29,000,000
|
|
(15,639,000
|
)
|
13,361,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Senior Living Management
|
SHO
|
Mezzanine
|
24,500,000
|
|
(12,556,000
|
)
|
11,944,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
127,500,000
|
|
$
|
(73,552,000
|
)
|
$
|
53,948,000
|
|
|||||||
In addition to smaller ongoing renovation commitments which will be included in the lease base when funded, in 2014 we provided a
$15,000,000
revolving line of credit to Senior Living, the maturity of which mirrors the 15-year term of the master lease also dating from 2014. While borrowings are used within the Senior Living portfolio to finance construction projects, including building additional units, up to
$5,000,000
of the facility may be used to meet general working-capital needs. In March 2016, we extended two additional mezzanine loans totaling
$14,000,000
to affiliates of Senior Living, to partially fund construction of a 186-unit senior living campus on Daniel Island in South Carolina.
See Note 4 for full details of our loan commitments. As provided above, loans funded do not include the effects of discounts or commitment fees. We expect to fully fund the Life Care Services Note A during 2017. Funding of the construction note commitment to Bickford is expected to transpire monthly throughout 2017. Our remaining loan commitment to Senior Living Management was funded in January 2017.
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Development Commitments:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Legend/The Ensign Group
|
SNF
|
Purchase
|
$
|
56,000,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
56,000,000
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
55,000,000
|
|
(49,097,000
|
)
|
5,903,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Chancellor Health Care
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
650,000
|
|
(52,000
|
)
|
598,000
|
|
|||||||
|
East Lake/Watermark Retirement
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
10,000,000
|
|
(3,450,000
|
)
|
6,550,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Santé Partners
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
3,500,000
|
|
(2,621,000
|
)
|
879,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
2,400,000
|
|
—
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|||||||
|
East Lake Capital Management
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
400,000
|
|
—
|
|
400,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Woodland Village
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
350,000
|
|
(227,000
|
)
|
123,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
128,300,000
|
|
$
|
(55,447,000
|
)
|
$
|
72,853,000
|
|
|||||||
Our development commitments are more fully described in Note 2.
We are obligated to purchase, from a developer, four new skilled nursing facilities in Texas for
$56,000,000
which will be leased to Legend and subleased to Ensign. The purchase window for the first facility is open through February 2017. The other
three
facilities are under construction by the developer.
We have committed
$55,000,000
to the development of
five
senior housing facilities in Illinois and Virginia to be managed by Bickford, each consisting of
60
private-pay assisted living and memory care units. Total costs funded includes land and development costs incurred on the project as of December 31, 2016.
One
facility opened in July 2016,
two
opened in October 2016, and
two
are planned to open in the first half of 2017.
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Contingencies:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
East Lake Capital Management
|
SHO
|
Lease Inducement
|
$
|
8,000,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
8,000,000
|
|
||||
|
Sycamore Street (Bickford affiliate)
|
SHO
|
Letter-of-credit
|
3,930,000
|
|
—
|
|
3,930,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction Loan
|
2,000,000
|
|
—
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
13,930,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
13,930,000
|
|
|||||||
In connection with our July 2015 lease to East Lake of three senior housing properties, NHI has committed to certain lease inducement payments of
$8,000,000
contingent on reaching and maintaining certain metrics, which have been assessed as not probable of payment and which we have not recorded on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. We are unaware of
43
circumstances that would change our initial assessment as to the contingent lease incentives. Not included in the above table is a seller earnout of
$750,000
, which was recorded on our balance sheet at acquisition in 2014.
In February 2014, we entered into a commitment on a letter of credit for the benefit of Sycamore, an affiliate of Bickford, which previously held a minority interest in PropCo. At
December 31, 2016
, our commitment on the letter of credit totaled
$3,930,000
. In connection with our funding commitment for the Illinois project discussed among loan commitments above, Bickford may also borrow an additional
$2,000,000
upon achieving certain operating performance metrics.
Litigation
Our facilities are subject to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. Our lessees and borrowers have indemnified, and are obligated to continue to indemnify us, against all liabilities arising from the operation of the facilities, and are further obligated to indemnify us against environmental or title problems affecting the real estate underlying such facilities. While there may be lawsuits pending against certain of the owners and/or lessees of the facilities, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending proceedings will have no material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
44
FFO, AFFO & FAD
These supplemental operating performance measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other REITs. Consequently, our Funds From Operations (“FFO”), Normalized FFO, Normalized Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”) and Normalized Funds Available for Distribution (“FAD”) may not provide a meaningful measure of our performance as compared to that of other REITs. Since other REITs may not use our definition of these operating performance measures, caution should be exercised when comparing our Company’s FFO, Normalized FFO, Normalized AFFO and Normalized FAD to that of other REITs. These financial performance measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) (these measures do not include changes in operating assets and liabilities) and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net earnings as an indication of operating performance, or to net cash flow from operating activities as determined by GAAP as a measure of liquidity, and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
Funds From Operations - FFO
Our FFO per diluted common share for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
decreased
$(0.06)
(
1%
) over the same period in
2015
. Our normalized FFO for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
increased
$0.20
(
4%
) over the same period in
2015
, primarily as the result of our new real estate investments in
2015
and
2016
. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) and applied by us, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate property, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and impairment, if applicable, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, if any. The Company’s computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or have a different interpretation of the current NAREIT definition from that of the Company; therefore, caution should be exercised when comparing our Company’s FFO to that of other REITs. Diluted FFO assumes the exercise of stock options and other potentially dilutive securities. Normalized FFO excludes from FFO certain items which may create some difficulty in comparing FFO for the current period to similar prior periods, and may include, but are not limited to, impairment of non-real estate assets, gains and losses attributable to the acquisition and disposition of assets and liabilities, recoveries of previous write-downs and the write off of debt issuance costs due to credit facility modifications.
FFO and normalized FFO are important supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen and fallen with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that uses historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative, and should be supplemented with a measure such as FFO. The term FFO was designed by the REIT industry to address this issue.
Adjusted Funds From Operations - AFFO
Our normalized AFFO per diluted common share for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
increased
$0.29
(
7.1%
) over the same period in
2015
due primarily to the impact of real estate investments completed during
2015
and
2016
. In addition to the adjustments included in the calculation of normalized FFO, normalized AFFO excludes the impact of any straight-line rent revenue, amortization of the original issue discount on our convertible senior notes and amortization of debt issuance costs.
Normalized AFFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for a REIT. GAAP requires a lessor to recognize contractual lease payments into income on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the lease. This straight-line adjustment has the effect of reporting lease income that is significantly more or less than the contractual cash flows received pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement. GAAP also requires the original issue discount of our convertible senior notes and debt issuance costs to be amortized as non-cash adjustments to earnings. Normalized AFFO is useful to our investors as it reflects the growth inherent in the contractual lease payments of our real estate portfolio.
Funds Available for Distribution - FAD
Our normalized FAD for the
year ended
December 31, 2016
increased
$17,077,000
(
10.9%
) over the same period in
2015
due primarily to the impact of real estate investments completed during
2015
and
2016
. In addition to the adjustments included in the calculation of normalized AFFO, normalized FAD excludes the impact of non-cash stock based compensation. Normalized FAD is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for a REIT as a useful indicator of the ability to distribute dividends to shareholders. Additionally, normalized FAD improves the understanding of our operating results among investors and makes comparisons with: (i) expected results, (ii) results of previous periods and (iii) results among REITs, more meaningful. Because FAD may function as a liquidity measure, we do not present FAD on a per-share basis.
45
The following table reconciles net income attributable to common stockholders, the most directly comparable GAAP metric, to FFO, Normalized FFO, Normalized AFFO and Normalized FAD and is presented for both basic and diluted weighted average common shares
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
:
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
151,540
|
|
$
|
148,862
|
|
$
|
101,609
|
|
||
|
Elimination of certain non-cash items in net income:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
59,565
|
|
53,163
|
|
38,078
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation related to noncontrolling interest
|
(927
|
)
|
(1,150
|
)
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net gain on sales of real estate
|
(4,582
|
)
|
(1,126
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
205,596
|
|
$
|
199,749
|
|
$
|
138,685
|
|
||
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
(29,673
|
)
|
(23,529
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of equity-method investee
|
(1,657
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of deferred tax asset
|
1,192
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Debt issuance costs expensed due to credit facility modifications
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,145
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of unamortized debt premium
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|||||
|
Non-cash write-off of straight-line rent receivable
|
9,456
|
|
—
|
|
932
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of lease intangible
|
6,400
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Revenue recognized due to early lease termination
|
(303
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition costs under business combination accounting
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
89
|
|
|||||
|
Recognition of unamortized mortgage note discount
|
(288
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Recovery of previous write-down
|
—
|
|
(491
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
190,723
|
|
$
|
175,729
|
|
$
|
140,196
|
|
||
|
Straight-line lease revenue, net
|
(22,198
|
)
|
(24,623
|
)
|
(16,463
|
)
|
|||||
|
Non-cash write-off of straight-line rent receivable
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|||||
|
Straight-line lease revenue, net, related to noncontrolling interest
|
(4
|
)
|
40
|
|
71
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of original issue discount
|
1,145
|
|
1,101
|
|
798
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
2,368
|
|
2,311
|
|
1,782
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs related to noncontrolling interest
|
(27
|
)
|
(30
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
|||||
|
Normalized AFFO
|
$
|
172,007
|
|
$
|
154,528
|
|
$
|
125,441
|
|
||
|
Non-cash stock based compensation
|
1,732
|
|
2,134
|
|
2,020
|
|
|||||
|
Normalized FAD
|
$
|
173,739
|
|
$
|
156,662
|
|
$
|
127,461
|
|
||
|
BASIC
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
39,013,412
|
|
37,604,594
|
|
33,375,966
|
|
|||||
|
FFO per common share
|
$
|
5.27
|
|
$
|
5.31
|
|
$
|
4.16
|
|
||
|
Normalized FFO per common share
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
$
|
4.20
|
|
||
|
Normalized AFFO per common share
|
$
|
4.41
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
$
|
3.76
|
|
||
|
DILUTED
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
39,155,380
|
|
37,644,171
|
|
33,416,014
|
|
|||||
|
FFO per common share
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
$
|
5.31
|
|
$
|
4.15
|
|
||
|
Normalized FFO per common share
|
$
|
4.87
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
$
|
4.20
|
|
||
|
Normalized AFFO per common share
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
$
|
4.10
|
|
$
|
3.75
|
|
||
46
Adjusted EBITDA
We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be an important supplemental measure because it provides information which we use to evaluate our performance and serves as an indication of our ability to service debt. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations, excluding real estate asset impairments and gains on dispositions and certain items which may create some difficulty in comparing Adjusted EBITDA for the current period to similar prior periods, and may include, but are not limited to, impairment of non-real estate assets, gains and losses attributable to the acquisition and disposition of assets and liabilities, and recoveries of previous write-downs. Since others may not use our definition of Adjusted EBITDA, caution should be exercised when comparing our Adjusted EBITDA to that of other companies.
The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable GAAP metric, to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
152,716
|
|
$
|
150,314
|
|
$
|
103,052
|
|
||
|
Interest expense at contractual rates
|
40,143
|
|
34,573
|
|
23,878
|
|
|||||
|
Franchise, excise and other taxes
|
1,009
|
|
985
|
|
605
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax benefit (expense) of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
749
|
|
(707
|
)
|
15
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation in continuing and discontinued operations
|
59,565
|
|
53,163
|
|
38,078
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and bond discount
|
3,514
|
|
3,413
|
|
2,580
|
|
|||||
|
Net gain on sales of real estate
|
(4,582
|
)
|
(1,126
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
(29,673
|
)
|
(23,529
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of equity-method investee
|
(1,657
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Debt issuance costs expensed due to credit facility modifications
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,145
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of unamortized debt premium
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|||||
|
Non-cash write-off of straight-line rent receivable
|
9,456
|
|
—
|
|
932
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of lease intangible
|
6,400
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Revenue recognized due to early lease termination
|
(303
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition costs under business combination accounting
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
89
|
|
|||||
|
Recognition of unamortized mortgage note discount
|
(288
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Recovery of previous write-down
|
—
|
|
(491
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
237,049
|
|
$
|
216,595
|
|
$
|
169,719
|
|
||
47
Interest Rate Risk
At
December 31, 2016
, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on approximately
$158,000,000
of variable-rate indebtedness (excluding
$250,000,000
of variable-rate debt that has been hedged through interest-rate swap contracts) and on our mortgage and other notes receivable. The unused portion (
$392,000,000
at
December 31, 2016
) of our credit facility, should it be drawn upon, is subject to variable rates.
Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt and loans receivable unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. Conversely, changes in interest rates on variable rate debt and investments would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. Assuming a 50 basis point increase or decrease in the interest rate related to variable-rate debt, and assuming no change in the outstanding balance as of
December 31, 2016
, net interest expense would increase or decrease annually by approximately
$790,000
or
$.02
per common share on a diluted basis.
We use derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to mitigate interest rate risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Derivatives are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value. We may engage in hedging strategies to manage our exposure to market risks in the future, depending on an analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our debt
(dollar amounts in thousands)
:
|
December 31, 2016
|
December 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance
1
|
% of total
|
Rate
5
|
Balance
1
|
% of total
|
Rate
5
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fixed rate:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Convertible senior notes
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
3.25
|
%
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
3.25
|
%
|
|||||
|
Unsecured term loans
2
|
650,000
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
4.01
|
%
|
575,000
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
4.03
|
%
|
|||||||
|
HUD mortgage loans
3
|
45,841
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
4.04
|
%
|
46,608
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
4.04
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Fannie Mae mortgage loans
4
|
78,084
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
3.79
|
%
|
78,084
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
3.79
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Variable rate:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility
|
158,000
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
2.27
|
%
|
34,000
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
1.93
|
%
|
|||||||
|
$
|
1,131,925
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
3.62
|
%
|
$
|
933,692
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
3.77
|
%
|
||||||
|
1
Differs from carrying amount due to unamortized discount.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2
Includes eight term loans in 2016 and seven term loans in 2015; rate is a weighted average
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
3
Includes 10 HUD mortgages; rate is a weighted average inclusive of a mortgage insurance premium
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
4
Includes 13 Fannie Mae mortgages
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
5
Total is weighted average rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The unsecured term loans in the table above give effect to $40,000,000, $80,000,000, and $130,000,000 notional amount interest rate swaps with maturities of April 2019, June 2020 and June 2020, respectively, that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. These loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread, currently 175 basis points, based on our Consolidated Coverage Ratio, as defined.
48
To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed-rate loans to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects on fair value (“FV”) assuming a parallel shift of 50 basis points (“bps”) in market interest rates for a contract with similar maturities as of
December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)
:
|
Balance
|
Fair Value
1
|
FV reflecting change in interest rates
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed rate:
|
-50 bps
|
+50 bps
|
|||||||||||||
|
Private placement term loans - unsecured
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
390,209
|
|
$
|
403,536
|
|
$
|
377,109
|
|
|||
|
Convertible senior notes
|
200,000
|
|
195,687
|
|
199,777
|
|
191,685
|
|
|||||||
|
Fannie Mae mortgage loans
|
78,084
|
|
75,322
|
|
78,029
|
|
72,720
|
|
|||||||
|
HUD mortgage loans
|
45,841
|
|
45,114
|
|
48,393
|
|
42,162
|
|
|||||||
|
1
The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt was due primarily to the overall change in interest rates.
|
|||||||||||||||
At
December 31, 2016
, the fair value of our mortgage and other notes receivable, discounted for estimated changes in the risk-free rate, was approximately
$133,229,000
. A 50 basis point increase in market rates would decrease the estimated fair value of our mortgage loans by approximately
$2,932,000
, while a 50 basis point decrease in such rates would increase their estimated fair value by approximately
$3,030,000
.
Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk, which is the potential change in fair value due to a change in quoted market prices. We account for our investments in marketable securities, with a fair value of
$11,745,000
at
December 31, 2016
, as available-for-sale securities. Increases and decreases in the fair market value of our investments in other marketable securities are unrealized gains and losses that are presented as a component of other comprehensive income. The investments in marketable securities are recorded at their fair value based on quoted market prices. Thus, there is exposure to equity price risk. We monitor our investments in marketable securities to consider evidence of whether any portion of our original investment is likely not to be recoverable, at which time we would record an impairment charge to operations. A hypothetical 10% change in quoted market prices would result in a related
$1,175,000
change in the fair value of our investments in marketable securities.
49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
National Health Investors, Inc.
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Health Investors, Inc. as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2016
. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Health Investors, Inc. at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2016
, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Health Investors, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016
, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated
February 16, 2017
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Nashville, Tennessee
February 16, 2017
50
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
Assets:
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||
|
Real estate properties:
|
|||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
172,003
|
|
$
|
137,532
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
2,285,122
|
|
1,945,323
|
|
|||
|
Construction in progress
|
15,729
|
|
13,011
|
|
|||
|
2,472,854
|
|
2,095,866
|
|
||||
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(313,080
|
)
|
(259,059
|
)
|
|||
|
Real estate properties, net
|
2,159,774
|
|
1,836,807
|
|
|||
|
Mortgage and other notes receivable, net
|
133,493
|
|
133,714
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
4,832
|
|
13,286
|
|
|||
|
Marketable securities
|
11,745
|
|
72,744
|
|
|||
|
Straight-line rent receivable
|
72,518
|
|
59,777
|
|
|||
|
Equity-method investment and other assets
|
21,271
|
|
15,544
|
|
|||
|
Assets held for sale, net
|
—
|
|
1,346
|
|
|||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
2,403,633
|
|
$
|
2,133,218
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity:
|
|||||||
|
Debt
|
$
|
1,115,981
|
|
$
|
914,443
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
20,003
|
|
20,147
|
|
|||
|
Dividends payable
|
35,863
|
|
32,637
|
|
|||
|
Lease deposit liabilities
|
21,325
|
|
21,275
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income
|
871
|
|
2,256
|
|
|||
|
Total Liabilities
|
1,194,043
|
|
990,758
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|||||
|
National Health Investors Stockholders' Equity:
|
|||||||
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|||||||
|
39,847,860 and 38,396,727 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
398
|
|
384
|
|
|||
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
1,173,588
|
|
1,085,136
|
|
|||
|
Cumulative net income in excess of dividends
|
29,873
|
|
19,862
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
5,731
|
|
27,910
|
|
|||
|
Total National Health Investors Stockholders' Equity
|
1,209,590
|
|
1,133,292
|
|
|||
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
—
|
|
9,168
|
|
|||
|
Total Equity
|
1,209,590
|
|
1,142,460
|
|
|||
|
Total Liabilities and Equity
|
$
|
2,403,633
|
|
$
|
2,133,218
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
51
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||
|
Rental income
|
$
|
232,393
|
|
$
|
214,447
|
|
$
|
166,279
|
|
||
|
Interest income from mortgage and other notes
|
13,805
|
|
10,206
|
|
7,013
|
|
|||||
|
Investment income and other
|
2,302
|
|
4,335
|
|
4,217
|
|
|||||
|
248,500
|
|
228,988
|
|
177,509
|
|
||||||
|
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
59,565
|
|
53,163
|
|
38,078
|
|
|||||
|
Interest
|
43,108
|
|
37,629
|
|
26,372
|
|
|||||
|
Legal
|
422
|
|
464
|
|
209
|
|
|||||
|
Franchise, excise and other taxes
|
1,009
|
|
985
|
|
605
|
|
|||||
|
General and administrative
|
9,773
|
|
10,519
|
|
9,107
|
|
|||||
|
Loan and realty losses (recoveries), net
|
15,856
|
|
(491
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
129,733
|
|
102,269
|
|
74,371
|
|
||||||
|
Income before equity-method investee, income tax benefit (expense),
|
|||||||||||
|
investment and other gains and noncontrolling interest
|
118,767
|
|
126,719
|
|
103,138
|
|
|||||
|
Loss from equity-method investee
|
(1,214
|
)
|
(1,767
|
)
|
(71
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit of taxable REIT subsidiary
|
(749
|
)
|
707
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|||||
|
Investment and other gains
|
35,912
|
|
24,655
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
152,716
|
|
150,314
|
|
103,052
|
|
|||||
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(1,176
|
)
|
(1,452
|
)
|
(1,443
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
151,540
|
|
$
|
148,862
|
|
$
|
101,609
|
|
||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||
|
Basic
|
39,013,412
|
|
37,604,594
|
|
33,375,966
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted
|
39,155,380
|
|
37,644,171
|
|
33,416,014
|
|
|||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders - basic
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
||
|
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders - diluted
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
$
|
3.95
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
52
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
152,716
|
|
$
|
150,314
|
|
$
|
103,052
|
|
||
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||
|
Change in unrealized gains on securities
|
5,072
|
|
46,780
|
|
2,853
|
|
|||||
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains in net income
|
(29,673
|
)
|
(23,529
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net change in unrealized gains on securities
|
(24,601
|
)
|
23,251
|
|
2,853
|
|
|||||
|
Increase (decrease) in fair value of cash flow hedge
|
(1,506
|
)
|
(6,062
|
)
|
(10,304
|
)
|
|||||
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for amounts recognized in net income
|
3,928
|
|
4,498
|
|
4,136
|
|
|||||
|
Net change in cash flow hedge liability
|
2,422
|
|
(1,564
|
)
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(22,179
|
)
|
21,687
|
|
(3,315
|
)
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive income
|
130,537
|
|
172,001
|
|
99,737
|
|
|||||
|
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(1,176
|
)
|
(1,452
|
)
|
(1,443
|
)
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
129,361
|
|
$
|
170,549
|
|
$
|
98,294
|
|
||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
53
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
152,716
|
|
$
|
150,314
|
|
$
|
103,052
|
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
|
|||||||||||
|
operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
59,565
|
|
53,163
|
|
38,078
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization
|
3,563
|
|
3,472
|
|
2,611
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of commitment fees and note receivable discounts
|
(693
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Straight-line rental income
|
(22,198
|
)
|
(24,623
|
)
|
(16,463
|
)
|
|||||
|
Non-cash interest income on construction loan
|
(1,021
|
)
|
(411
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Unamortized debt premium written off
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|||||
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,145
|
|
|||||
|
Loan and realty losses (recoveries), net
|
15,856
|
|
(491
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of real estate
|
(4,582
|
)
|
(1,126
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of equity-method investee
|
(1,657
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net realized gains on sales of marketable securities
|
(29,673
|
)
|
(23,529
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
1,732
|
|
2,134
|
|
2,020
|
|
|||||
|
Loss from equity-method investee
|
1,214
|
|
1,767
|
|
71
|
|
|||||
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Equity-method investment and other assets
|
1,018
|
|
216
|
|
(2,334
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
2,764
|
|
1,038
|
|
1,448
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred income
|
(1,385
|
)
|
2,501
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
177,219
|
|
164,425
|
|
126,143
|
|
|||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Investment in mortgage and other notes receivable
|
(92,051
|
)
|
(92,249
|
)
|
(4,447
|
)
|
|||||
|
Collection of mortgage and other notes receivable
|
84,228
|
|
21,495
|
|
1,456
|
|
|||||
|
Investment in real estate
|
(359,257
|
)
|
(106,315
|
)
|
(520,505
|
)
|
|||||
|
Investment in real estate development
|
(32,102
|
)
|
(14,641
|
)
|
(8,455
|
)
|
|||||
|
Investment in renovations of existing real estate
|
(3,378
|
)
|
(3,157
|
)
|
(4,211
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payments into facility repair escrows
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment of real estate purchase liability
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2,600
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment allocated to cancellation of lease purchase option
|
(6,400
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term escrow deposit
|
(8,208
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from disposition of real estate properties
|
27,723
|
|
9,593
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
—
|
|
(8,458
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
59,607
|
|
57,406
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(329,838
|
)
|
(136,326
|
)
|
(540,316
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities
|
124,000
|
|
(340,000
|
)
|
207,000
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from convertible senior notes
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
200,000
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of secured debt
|
—
|
|
78,084
|
|
38,007
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from borrowings on term loans
|
75,000
|
|
325,000
|
|
130,000
|
|
|||||
|
Payments of term loans
|
(767
|
)
|
(742
|
)
|
(328,515
|
)
|
|||||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
(258
|
)
|
(2,608
|
)
|
(8,443
|
)
|
|||||
|
Taxes remitted in relation to employee stock options exercised
|
(1,133
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from equity offering, net
|
104,190
|
|
49,114
|
|
270,798
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
(1,565
|
)
|
(2,292
|
)
|
(2,049
|
)
|
|||||
|
Distribution to acquire non-controlling interest
|
(17,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends paid to stockholders
|
(138,303
|
)
|
(124,657
|
)
|
(100,650
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
144,165
|
|
(18,100
|
)
|
406,148
|
|
|||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(8,454
|
)
|
9,999
|
|
(8,025
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
13,286
|
|
3,287
|
|
11,312
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
4,832
|
|
$
|
13,286
|
|
$
|
3,287
|
|
||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
54
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||||
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized
|
$
|
39,539
|
|
$
|
31,289
|
|
$
|
22,172
|
|
||
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Tax deferred exchange funds applied to investment in real estate
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
23,813
|
|
||
|
Settlement of contingent asset acquisition liability
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(3,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Conditional consideration in asset acquisition
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
||
|
Change in accounts payable related to investments in real estate
|
$
|
(430
|
)
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
$
|
2,091
|
|
||
|
Accounts payable increase due to escrow deposits
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,062
|
|
||
|
Reclass of note balance into real estate investment upon acquisition
|
$
|
9,753
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Assumption of debt in real estate acquisition (at fair value)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
7,858
|
|
||
|
Unsettled marketable securities sales transactions
|
$
|
6,464
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Non-cash sale of equity-method investment
|
$
|
8,100
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Change in escrow deposit related to investment in real estate
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Increase (decrease) in fair value of cash flow hedge
|
$
|
(1,506
|
)
|
$
|
(6,062
|
)
|
$
|
(10,304
|
)
|
||
|
Conversion of preferred stock to common
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
38,132
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
55
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
Common Stock
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
Cumulative Net Income in Excess (Deficit) of Dividends
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
Total National Health Investors Stockholders’ Equity
|
Noncontrolling Interest
|
Total Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balances at December 31, 2013
|
33,051,176
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
$
|
753,635
|
|
$
|
3,043
|
|
$
|
9,538
|
|
$
|
766,546
|
|
$
|
10,614
|
|
$
|
777,160
|
|
|||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
101,609
|
|
(3,315
|
)
|
98,294
|
|
1,443
|
|
99,737
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2,049
|
)
|
(2,049
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
4,427,500
|
|
44
|
|
270,754
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
270,798
|
|
—
|
|
270,798
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued on stock options exercised
|
7,226
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,020
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,020
|
|
—
|
|
2,020
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Equity component of convertible debt
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,487
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,487
|
|
—
|
|
7,487
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Dividends declared, $3.08 per common share
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(105,221
|
)
|
—
|
|
(105,221
|
)
|
—
|
|
(105,221
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balances at December 31, 2014
|
37,485,902
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
$
|
1,033,896
|
|
$
|
(569
|
)
|
$
|
6,223
|
|
$
|
1,039,925
|
|
$
|
10,008
|
|
$
|
1,049,933
|
|
|||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
148,862
|
|
21,687
|
|
170,549
|
|
1,452
|
|
172,001
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2,292
|
)
|
(2,292
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
830,506
|
|
8
|
|
49,381
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
49,389
|
|
—
|
|
49,389
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Equity offerring costs
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(275
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(275
|
)
|
—
|
|
(275
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued on stock options exercised
|
80,319
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,134
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,134
|
|
—
|
|
2,134
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Dividends declared, $3.40 per common share
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(128,431
|
)
|
—
|
|
(128,431
|
)
|
—
|
|
(128,431
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balances at December 31, 2015
|
38,396,727
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
$
|
1,085,136
|
|
$
|
19,862
|
|
$
|
27,910
|
|
$
|
1,133,292
|
|
$
|
9,168
|
|
$
|
1,142,460
|
|
|||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
151,540
|
|
(22,179
|
)
|
129,361
|
|
1,176
|
|
130,537
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
(1,565
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of non-controlling interest
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,321
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,321
|
)
|
(8,779
|
)
|
(25,100
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
1,395,642
|
|
14
|
|
104,176
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
104,190
|
|
—
|
|
104,190
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Taxes paid on employee stock awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,133
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,133
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,133
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Shares issued on stock options exercised
|
55,491
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,732
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,732
|
|
—
|
|
1,732
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Dividends declared, $3.60 per common share
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(141,529
|
)
|
—
|
|
(141,529
|
)
|
—
|
|
(141,529
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balances at December 31, 2016
|
39,847,860
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
$
|
1,173,588
|
|
$
|
29,873
|
|
$
|
5,731
|
|
$
|
1,209,590
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,209,590
|
|
|||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
56
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
The Company
- National Health Investors, Inc., established in 1991 as a Maryland corporation, is a self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in sale-leaseback, joint-venture, mortgage and mezzanine financing of need-driven and discretionary senior housing and medical investments. Our portfolio consists of lease, mortgage and other note investments in independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities, senior living campuses, skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and medical office buildings. Other investments have included marketable securities and a joint venture structured to comply with the provisions of the REIT Investment Diversification Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”) through which we invested in facility operations managed by independent third-parties. We fund our real estate investments primarily through: (1) operating cash flow, (2) debt offerings, including bank lines of credit and term debt, both unsecured and secured, and (3) the sale of equity securities. Units, beds and square footage disclosures in this annual report on Form 10-K are unaudited.
Principles of Consolidation
- The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, partnerships and consolidated variable interest entities (“VIE”) where NHI is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, if any. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Net income is reduced by the portion of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.
A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance for our arrangements with VIEs which requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In accordance with FASB guidance, management must evaluate each of the Company’s contractual relationships which creates a variable interest in other entities. If the Company has a variable interest and the entity is a VIE, then management must determine whether or not the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If it is determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary, NHI consolidates the VIE. We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.
At
December 31, 2016
, we held an interest in
seven
unconsolidated VIEs and, because we generally lack either directly or through related parties any material input in the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance, we have concluded that NHI is not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, we account for our transactions with these entities and their subsidiaries at amortized cost.
Our VIEs are summarized below by date of initial involvement. For further discussion of the nature of the relationships, including the sources of our exposure to these VIEs, see the notes to our consolidated financial statements cross-referenced below.
|
Date
|
Name
|
Classification
|
Carrying Amount
|
Maximum Exposure to Loss
|
Sources of Exposure
|
||||
|
2012
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
Notes and straight-line receivable
|
$
|
6,384,000
|
|
$
|
17,971,000
|
|
Notes 2, 4
|
|
2012
|
Sycamore Street
|
N/A
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,930,000
|
|
Note 4
|
|
2014
|
Senior Living Communities
|
Notes and straight-line receivable
|
$
|
31,638,000
|
|
$
|
45,118,000
|
|
Notes 4, 12
|
|
2014
|
Life Care Services affiliate
|
Notes receivable
|
$
|
75,112,000
|
|
$
|
93,211,000
|
|
Note 4
|
|
2015
|
East Lake Capital Mgmt.
|
Straight-line receivable
|
$
|
1,640,000
|
|
$
|
1,640,000
|
|
Note 2
|
|
2016
|
The Ensign Group developer
|
N/A
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Note 2
|
|
2016
|
Senior Living Management
|
Notes and straight-line receivable
|
$
|
13,749,000
|
|
$
|
25,750,000
|
|
Note 4
|
57
We are not obligated to provide support beyond our stated commitments to these tenants and borrowers whom we classify as VIEs, and accordingly our maximum exposure to loss as a result of these relationships is limited to the amount of our commitments, as shown above and discussed in the notes. When the above relationships involve leases, some additional exposure to economic loss is present and unquantifiable beyond that tabulated above, where we quantify potential accounting loss for those assets in which NHI has some basis. Generally, additional economic loss on a lease, if any, would be limited to that resulting from a short period of arrearage and non-payment of monthly rent before we are able to take effective remedial action, as well as costs incurred in transitioning the lease. The potential extent of such loss will be dependent upon individual facts and circumstances, cannot be quantified, and is therefore not included in the tabulation above. Typically, the only carrying amounts involving our leases are accumulated straight-line receivables.
We apply FASB guidance related to investments in joint ventures based on the type of controlling rights held by the members’ interests in limited liability companies that may preclude consolidation by the majority equity owner in certain circumstances in which the majority equity owner would otherwise consolidate the joint venture.
We have structured our joint ventures to be compliant with the provisions of the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 ("RIDEA") which permits NHI to receive rent payments through a triple-net lease between a property company and an operating company and allows NHI the opportunity to capture additional value on the improving performance of the operating company through distributions to a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). Accordingly, prior to the termination of our joint venture on September 30, 2016, our TRS held NHI’s equity interest in an unconsolidated operating company, which we did not control, thus providing an organizational structure that allowed the TRS to engage in a broad range of activities and share in revenues that were otherwise non-qualifying income under the REIT gross income tests.
Equity-Method Investment
- We have reported our TRS’ investment in an unconsolidated entity, over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence but not control, under the equity method of accounting. Under this accounting method, our pro rata share of the entity’s earnings or losses through September 30, 2016, is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Our joint venture arrangement was terminated on September 30, 2016. Additionally, we adjusted our investment carrying amount to reflect our share of changes in the equity-method investee’s capital resulting from its capital transactions.
Noncontrolling Interest -
We have presented the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we controlled (and thus consolidated) as noncontrolling interest and classified such interest as a component of consolidated equity separate from total NHI stockholders’ equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016. In addition, we excluded net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest from net income attributable to common shareholders in our Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, we do not hold any non-controlling interests.
Use of Estimates -
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Earnings Per Share
- The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period is used to calculate basic earnings per common share. Diluted earnings per common share assume the exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method, to the extent dilutive. Diluted earnings per share also incorporate the potential dilutive impact of our 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2021. We apply the treasury stock method to our convertible debt instruments, the effect of which is that conversion will not be assumed for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share unless the average share price of our common stock for the period exceeds the conversion price per share.
Fair Value Measurements
- Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level fair value hierarchy is required to prioritize the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
58
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
If the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. When an event or circumstance alters our assessment of the observability and thus the appropriate classification of an input to a fair value measurement which we deem to be significant to the fair value measurement as a whole, we will transfer that fair value measurement to the appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy.
Real Estate Properties -
Real estate properties are recorded at cost or, if acquired through business combination, at fair value, including the fair value of contingent consideration, if any. Cost or fair value at the time of acquisition is allocated among land, buildings, tenant improvements, lease and other intangibles, and personal property. For properties acquired in transactions accounted for as asset purchases, the purchase price allocation is based on the relative fair values of the assets acquired. Cost includes the amount of contingent consideration, if any, deemed to be probable at the acquisition date. Cost also includes capitalized interest during construction periods. We use the straight-line method of depreciation for buildings over their estimated useful lives of
40
years, and improvements over their estimated useful lives ranging from
3
to
25
years. For contingent consideration arising from business combinations, the liability is adjusted to estimated fair value at each reporting date through earnings.
We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of our real estate properties on a property-by-property basis. On a quarterly basis, we review our properties for recoverability when events or circumstances, including significant physical changes in the property, significant adverse changes in general economic conditions and significant deteriorations of the underlying cash flows of the property, indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable. The need to recognize an impairment charge is based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property compared to the carrying value of that property. If recognition of an impairment charge is necessary, it is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the fair value of the property.
Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable -
Each quarter, we evaluate the carrying values of our notes receivable on an instrument-by-instrument basis for recoverability when events or circumstances, including the non-receipt of contractual principal and interest payments, significant deteriorations of the financial condition of the borrower and significant adverse changes in general economic conditions, indicate that the carrying amount of the note receivable may not be recoverable. If a note receivable becomes more than 30 days delinquent as to contractual principal or interest payments, the loan is classified as non-performing, and thereafter we recognize all amounts due when received. If necessary, an impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the discounted cash flows expected to be received under the note receivable or, if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the note receivable.
Cash Equivalents
- Cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
Concentration of Credit Risks
- Our credit risks primarily relate to cash and cash equivalents and investments in mortgage and other notes receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in bank accounts and overnight investments. We maintain our bank deposit accounts with large financial institutions in amounts that often exceed federally-insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts. Our mortgages and other notes receivable consist primarily of secured loans on facilities.
Our financial instruments, principally our investments in marketable securities and notes receivable, are subject to the possibility of loss of the carrying values as a result of either the failure of other parties to perform according to their contractual obligations or changes in market prices which may make the instruments less valuable. We obtain collateral in the form of mortgage liens and other protective rights for notes receivable and continually monitor these rights in order to reduce such possibilities of loss. We evaluate the need to provide for reserves for potential losses on our financial instruments based on management’s periodic review of our portfolio on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
Marketable Securities
- Investments in marketable debt and equity securities must be categorized as trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Our investments in marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale securities. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in other comprehensive income. We evaluate our securities for other-than-temporary impairments on at least a quarterly basis. Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined on a specific-identification basis.
A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale or held-to-maturity security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in an impairment to reduce the carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new
59
cost basis for the security is established. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, we consider whether we have the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and consider whether evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary. Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in value subsequent to year-end and forecasted performance of the investment.
Deferred Loan Costs
- Costs incurred to acquire debt are amortized by the effective interest method over the term of the related debt.
Deferred Income
- Deferred income primarily includes non-refundable lease commitment fees received by us, which are amortized into income over the expected period of the related loan or lease. In the event that our financing commitment to a potential borrower or lessee expires, the related commitment fees are recognized into income immediately. Commitment fees may be charged based on the terms of the lease agreements and the creditworthiness of the parties.
Rental Income
- Base rental income is recognized using the straight-line method over the term of the lease to the extent that lease payments are considered collectible. Under certain leases, we receive additional contingent rent, which is calculated on the increase in revenues of the lessee over a base year or base quarter. We recognize contingent rent annually or quarterly based on the actual revenues of the lessee once the target threshold has been achieved. Lease payments that depend on a factor directly related to future use of the property, such as an increase in annual revenues over a base year, are considered to be contingent rentals and are excluded from the schedule of minimum lease payments.
If rental income calculated on a straight-line basis exceeds the cash rent due under a lease, the difference is recorded as an increase to straight-line rent receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and an increase in rental income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. If rental income on a straight-line basis is calculated to be less than cash received, there is a decrease in the same accounts.
We identify a lease as non-performing if a required payment is not received within 30 days of the date it is due. Our policy related to rental income on non-performing leased real estate properties is to recognize rental income in the period when the related cash is received. We have identified
one
lease, a
126
-unit senior housing portfolio, as non-performing though as of
December 31, 2016
the tenant became current with its obligations.
Mortgage Interest Income
- Mortgage interest income is recognized based on the interest rates and principal amounts outstanding on the mortgage notes receivable. Under certain mortgages, we receive additional contingent interest, which is calculated on the increase in the current year revenues of a borrower over a base year. We identify a mortgage loan as non-performing if a required payment is not received within 30 days of the date it is due. Our policy related to mortgage interest income on non-performing mortgage loans is to recognize mortgage interest income in the period when the cash is received. As of
December 31, 2016
, we had not identified any of our mortgages as non-performing.
Investment Income and Other
- Investment income and other includes dividends when declared and interest when earned from our investments in marketable securities, and interest on cash and cash equivalents when earned. Realized gains and losses on sales of marketable securities using the specific-identification method are included as a separate component of continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income as investment and other gains.
Derivatives
- In the normal course of business, we are subject to risk from adverse fluctuations in interest rates. We have chosen to manage this risk through the use of derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate swaps. Counterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Our objective in managing exposure to market risk is to limit the impact on cash flows.
To qualify for hedge accounting, our interest rate swaps must effectively reduce the risk exposure that they are designed to hedge. In addition, at inception of a qualifying cash flow hedging relationship, the underlying transaction or transactions must be, and be expected to remain, probable of occurring in accordance with our related assertions. All of our hedges are cash flow hedges.
We recognize all derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives required to be bifurcated, as assets or liabilities at their fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or that do not meet the criteria of hedge accounting are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, the change in fair value of the effective portion of the derivatives is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), whereas the change in fair value of the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings. Gains
60
and losses are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings once the underlying hedged transaction is recognized in earnings.
Federal Income Taxes
- We intend at all times to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We record income tax expense or benefit with respect to one of our subsidiaries which is taxed as a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) under provisions similar to those applicable to regular corporations. Aside from such income taxes which may be applicable to the taxable income in the TRS, we will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT and make distributions to stockholders at least equal to or in excess of 90% our taxable income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been made in the consolidated financial statements, except for the provision on the taxable income of the TRS, which is included in our consolidated statements of income under the caption, “Income tax benefit (expense) of taxable REIT subsidiary.” Our failure to continue to qualify under the applicable REIT qualification rules and regulations would have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to stockholders, differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due primarily to differences in the basis of assets, estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation expense, gains on sales of real estate, non-cash compensation expense and recognition of commitment fees.
Our tax returns filed for years beginning in 2013 are subject to examination by taxing authorities. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in our consolidated financial statements as a component of income tax expense.
Segment Disclosures
- We are in the business of owning and financing health care properties. We are managed as one segment, rather than multiple segments, for internal purposes and for internal decision making.
Reclassifications
- We have reclassified, for all periods presented, certain loan commitment fees paid by our borrowers, which were previously accounted for as deferred revenues on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2015. The fees are included in our consolidated balance sheets as a reduction of the related loan receivable balance. The effect has been to reduce total assets and total liabilities by
$1,317,000
on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015. See Note 15 for a description of recent accounting pronouncements which require reclassification of items previously presented. Within comprehensive income we have reclassified certain balances without impacting total other comprehensive income or comprehensive income. Where necessary to conform the presentation of prior periods to the current period, we have reclassified certain additional balances.
New Accounting Pronouncements
- For a review of recent accounting pronouncements pertinent to our operations and management’s judgment as to the impact that the eventual adoption of these pronouncements will have on our financial position and results of operation, see Note 15.
As of
December 31, 2016
, we owned
197
health care real estate properties located in
32
states and consisting of
125
senior housing communities,
67
skilled nursing facilities,
3
hospitals and
2
medical office buildings. Our senior housing properties include assisted living facilities, senior living campuses, independent living facilities, and entrance-fee communities. These investments (excluding our corporate office of
$1,175,000
) consisted of properties with an original cost of approximately
$2,471,679,000
, rented under triple-net leases to
27
lessees.
Acquisitions and New Leases of Real Estate
During the
year ended
December 31, 2016
, we announced the following real estate investments and commitments as described below
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
Operator
|
Properties
|
Asset Class
|
Amount
|
|||||
|
The Ensign Group
|
8
|
SNF
|
$
|
118,500
|
|
|||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
5
|
SHO
|
89,900
|
|
||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
1
|
SHO
|
74,000
|
|
||||
|
Watermark Retirement / East Lake
|
2
|
SHO
|
66,300
|
|
||||
|
Chancellor Health Care
|
2
|
SHO
|
36,650
|
|
||||
|
Marathon/Village Concepts
|
1
|
SHO
|
9,813
|
|
||||
|
$
|
395,163
|
|
||||||
61
The Ensign Group
On April 1, 2016, we purchased
eight
skilled nursing facilities in Texas totaling
931
beds for
$118,500,000
in cash. The facilities were owned and operated by NHI’s existing tenant, Legend Healthcare (“Legend”), and we accounted for the purchase as an asset acquisition. Concurrent with the acquisition, we amended in-place leases covering the
nine
existing skilled nursing facilities we leased to Legend, extending their provisions to the new facilities. The amendment also replaced purchase options that provided for equal sharing of any appreciation in value, within a specified range, with purchase options having a price determined at fair value, exercisable at the end of the lease term. Based on our analysis of the in-place rights, benefits and obligations,
$6,400,000
of the consideration in the acquisition was allocated to the canceled provisions related to the in-place leases.
On May 1, 2016, Legend and NHI agreed to transition Legend’s skilled nursing operations under its lease with NHI to a new operator, and NHI entered into a new
15
-year master lease with affiliates of The Ensign Group, Inc. (“Ensign”) on
15
of the former Legend facilities for an initial annual amount of
$17,750,000
, plus an annual escalator based on inflation. NHI’s total original investment in the
15
facilities leased to Ensign is approximately
$211,000,000
. The Ensign lease has
two
5
-year renewal options. Upon entering the new lease, NHI sold to Ensign for
$24,600,000
two
remaining skilled nursing facilities in Texas totaling
245
beds previously under lease to Legend. The Ensign lease, secured in part by the operator’s corporate guaranty, replaces the amended Legend lease, and, accordingly, the rights, benefits and obligations held by Legend have terminated. In recording the transition of our leases to Ensign, we wrote off the fair value assigned to the former Legend leases and
$8,326,000
of accumulated straight-line rent receivable, leaving an allocation of
$6,252,000
to land and
$105,848,000
to depreciable assets.
As part of this transaction, NHI is committed to purchase, from a developer,
four
new skilled nursing facilities in Texas for
$56,000,000
which are leased to Legend and subleased to Ensign. The purchase window for the first facility is open. The other
three
facilities are under construction by the developer. The fixed-price nature of the commitment creates a variable interest for NHI in the developer, whom NHI considers to lack sufficient equity to finance its operations without recourse to additional subordinated debt. The presence of these conditions causes the developer to be considered a VIE.
Watermark Retirement / East Lake
On June 1, 2016, NHI acquired
two
entrance fee continuing care retirement communities (“CCRCs”) from funds managed by certain affiliates of East Lake Capital Management (“East Lake”) for
$56,300,000
in cash, inclusive of a
$4,500,000
regulatory deposit, and entered into a lease transaction with affiliates of East Lake. Because the facilities had no history as rental operations, we accounted for the purchase as an asset acquisition. NHI has committed up to an additional
$10,000,000
for capital improvements and potential expansion of the communities over the next
two
years, of which
$3,450,000
was drawn at
December 31, 2016
. The CCRCs consist of
460
units and are located in Bridgeport and Southbury, Connecticut. The communities are sub-leased to affiliates of Watermark Retirement Communities (“Watermark”), the current manager. The lease has a term of
15
years, with an initial lease rate to East Lake of
7%
with escalators of
3.5%
in years
two
through
four
, and
3%
annually thereafter.
In conjunction with the lease, East Lake acquired a purchase option on the properties as a whole, exercisable beginning in year
six
of the lease. The option price will be based on our initial acquisition cost, our funding of capital improvements and expansions, other additional funding that may then be in place, or further rent escalations during the remaining duration of the option window.
East Lake’s June 2016 lease represents an expansion of its relationship with NHI, which began in July 2015, with our acquisition and lease to East Lake of
two
senior living campuses and
one
assisted living/memory care facility. East Lake’s relationship to NHI consists of its leasehold interests and purchase options and is considered a variable interest, analogous to a financing arrangement. East Lake is structured to limit liability for potential damage claims, is capitalized for that purpose and is considered a VIE.
Chancellor
On August 31, 2016, we acquired
two
facilities consisting of a senior living campus and a memory-care facility in McMinnville, Oregon, for
$36,650,000
in cash inclusive of closing costs of
$150,000
. We leased the facilities to Chancellor Health Care (“Chancellor”) for an initial lease term of
15 years
, plus renewal options, at an initial annual lease rate of
7.5%
plus annual escalators. Because the facility was owner-occupied, the purchase was accounted for as an asset acquisition.
62
Marathon/Village Concepts
On January 15, 2016, we acquired a
98
-unit independent living community, Woodland Village, in Chehalis, Washington, for
$9,463,000
in cash inclusive of closing costs of
$213,000
plus an additional commitment to fund
$350,000
in specified capital improvements, of which
$227,000
has been funded at
December 31, 2016
. We leased the facility to a partnership between Marathon Development and Village Concepts Retirement Communities for an initial lease term of
15 years
. The lease provides for an initial annual lease rate of
7.25%
plus annual escalators. Because the facility was owner-occupied, the purchase was accounted for as an asset acquisition.
Major Customers
Bickford
On June 1, 2016, in an asset acquisition, we acquired
five
assisted living and memory care facilities owned by Sycamore Street, LLC (“Sycamore”) and operated by Bickford Senior Living (“Bickford”) for
$87,500,000
, including
$77,747,000
in cash and cancellation of notes and accrued interest receivable totaling
$9,753,000
(Note 4). Additionally, we have committed
$2,400,000
for capital expenditures and expansion of the existing facilities, the funding of which will be added to the lease base. The lease provides for an initial rate of
7.25%
and term of
15
years plus
two
five
-year renewal options. The annual lease escalator is
3%
. NHI’s purchase option on an additional Bickford facility was relinquished. The facilities, consisting of
277
total units, are located in Iowa (
2
), Missouri, Illinois, and Nebraska. The facilities were not included in the RIDEA joint venture in place at the time between the parties.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our Bickford portfolio consists of
42
facilities,
two
of which are under construction and expected to open in 2017. NHI has a right to future Bickford acquisitions, development projects and refinancing transactions. Of our total revenues, $
30,732,000
, (
12%
),
$24,121,000
(
11%
) and
$21,421,000
(
12%
) were recognized as rental income from Bickford for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Of these facilities,
35
, were held in a RIDEA structure,
32
of which are stabilized, and operated as a joint venture until September 30, 2016, when NHI and Sycamore, an affiliate of Bickford Senior Living (“Bickford”), entered into a definitive agreement terminating the joint venture and converting Bickford’s participation to a triple-net tenancy with assumption of existing leases and terms. Through September 30, 2016, NHI owned an
85%
equity interest and Sycamore owned a
15%
equity interest in our consolidated subsidiary (“PropCo”). The facilities were leased to an operating company (“OpCo”), in which NHI previously held a non-controlling
85%
ownership interest. The facilities are managed by Bickford. Our joint venture was structured to comply with the provisions of RIDEA.
According to provisions of the unwinding, NHI agreed to redeem Bickford’s
15%
interest in the real estate underlying the joint venture (PropCo) for a distribution to Bickford of
$25,100,000
, before the offset by Bickford of
$8,100,000
payable to NHI in acquisition of our non-controlling
85%
interest in senior housing operations (OpCo), which NHI had carried on its balance sheet as an equity-method investment through September 30, 2016. The remaining balance due of
$10,546,000
related to the unwinding transaction was settled in November 2016. See Note 3 for discussion of the disposition of our equity-method investment in OpCo in conjunction with the unwinding.
No gain or loss was recognized on our acquisition of Bickford’s
15%
interest in PropCo, which had previously been consolidated. Bickford’s non-controlling interest was de-recognized, and the difference between the fair value of NHI’s cost allocated to the redemption and the carrying amount of the 15% non-controlling interest was recorded as an adjustment to equity through additional-paid-in capital.
Provisions governing details of the unwinding reach to our various arrangements with Bickford and include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
•
|
For the
32
stabilized facilities previously owned by the joint venture, forward annual contractual rent is unchanged at
$26,454,000
plus annual escalators of
3%
.
|
|
•
|
For the
five
additional facilities under development owned by NHI, of which
one
opened in July 2016,
two
opened in October 2016, and
two
are planned to open in the first half of 2017, funded amounts will be added to the lease basis during construction and up to the first six months after opening; thereafter, base rent will be charged to Bickford at a
9%
annual rate. Once the facilities are stabilized, rent will be reset to fair market value.
|
63
|
•
|
Future development projects between the parties will be funded through a construction loan at
9%
annual interest. NHI has a purchase option at stabilization, whereby rent will be set based on our total investment with a floor of
9.55%
on NHI’s total investment.
|
|
•
|
On current and future development projects, Bickford as the operator will be entitled to incentive payments based on the achievement of predetermined operational milestones, the funding of which will increase the investment base for determining the NHI lease payment.
|
Senior Living Communities
On November 8, 2016, we acquired Evergreen Woods, a
299
-unit entrance-fee community in Connecticut, for
$74,000,000
in cash, inclusive of a
$3,708,000
regulatory deposit. The facility will be added to our existing master lease with Senior Living Communities, LLC (“Senior Living”) at the current lease rate of
6.77%
, subject to
4%
escalation in January 2017 and 2018 and
3%
annually thereafter. Our master lease with Senior Living has an initial term of
13 years
, plus renewal options. Because Evergreen Woods was previously owner-operated, we accounted for our purchase of the property as an asset acquisition. We attributed
$7,724,000
of the purchase price to fair value of the land, and
$62,568,000
to the fair value of building and improvements.
As of
December 31, 2016
, we leased
nine
retirement communities with
1,970
units to Senior Living. The
15
-year master lease contains
two
5
-year renewal options and provides for annual escalators of
4%
in 2017 and 2018 and
3%
thereafter.
Of our total revenues,
$40,332,000
(
16%
),
$39,422,000
(
17%
) and
$1,533,000
(
1%
) were recognized as rental income from Senior Living for the years ending
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, including
$7,369,000
,
$8,422,000
and
$328,000
, respectively, in straight-line rent.
Holiday
As of
December 31, 2016
, we leased
25
independent living facilities to an affiliate of Holiday Retirement (“Holiday”). The master lease term of
17
years began in December 2013 and provides for an escalator of
4.5%
in 2017 and a minimum of
3.5%
each year thereafter.
Of our total revenues,
$43,817,000
(
18%
),
$43,817,000
(
19%
) and
$43,817,000
(
25%
) were derived from Holiday for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, including
$8,965,000
,
$10,466,000
and
$11,902,000
in straight-line rent, respectively. Our tenant operates the facilities pursuant to a management agreement with a Holiday-affiliated manager.
NHC
As of
December 31, 2016
, we leased
42
facilities under
two
master leases to National HealthCare Corporation (“NHC”), a publicly-held company and the lessee of our legacy properties. The facilities leased to NHC consist of
3
independent living facilities and
39
skilled nursing facilities (
4
of which are subleased to other parties for whom the lease payments are guaranteed to us by NHC). These facilities are leased to NHC under the terms of an amended master lease agreement originally dated October 17, 1991 (“the 1991 lease”) which includes our
35
remaining legacy properties and a master lease agreement dated August 30, 2013 (“the 2013 lease”) which includes
7
skilled nursing facilities acquired from a third party.
The 1991 lease has been amended to extend the lease expiration to December 31, 2026. There are
two
additional
5
-year renewal options, each at fair rental value of such leased property as negotiated between the parties and determined without including the value attributable to any improvements to the leased property voluntarily made by NHC at its expense. Under the terms of the lease, the base annual rental is
$30,750,000
and rent escalates by
4%
of the increase, if any, in each facility’s revenue over a 2007 base year. The 2013 lease provides for a base annual rental of
$3,450,000
and has a lease expiration of August 2028. Under the terms of the 2013 lease, rent escalates
4%
of the increase, if any, in each facility’s revenue over a 2014 base year. For both the 1991 lease and the 2013 lease, we refer to this additional rent component as “percentage rent.” During the last three years of the 2013 lease, NHC will have the option to purchase the facilities for
$49,000,000
.
64
The following table summarizes the percentage rent income from NHC (
in thousands
):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Current year
|
$
|
2,932
|
|
$
|
2,385
|
|
$
|
2,292
|
|
||
|
Prior year final certification
1
|
547
|
|
94
|
|
15
|
|
|||||
|
Total percentage rent
|
$
|
3,479
|
|
$
|
2,479
|
|
$
|
2,307
|
|
||
1
For purposes of the percentage rent calculation described in the Master Lease Agreement, NHC’s annual revenue by facility for a given year is certified to NHI by March 31st of the following year.
Of our total revenue,
$37,626,000
(
15%
),
$36,625,000
(
16%
) and
$36,453,000
(
21%
) in
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively, were derived from NHC.
The chairman of our board of directors is also a director on NHC’s board of directors. As of December 31, 2016, NHC owned
1,630,462
shares of our common stock.
Other Lease Activity
As a result of material noncompliance with lease terms, we began exploratory measures to effect either transitioning the lease of a
126
-unit assisted living portfolio from the current tenant or the marketing of the underlying properties. Either of these courses of action result in recording a reserve, for accounting purposes, at
December 31, 2016
of
$1,131,000
related to straight-line rent receivables. While straight-line receivables represent the effects of recognizing past and future escalations under terms of the lease using the straight-line method, we anticipate full recovery of all amounts billed to date under the lease. We have made no provision for any legal or other costs associated with the transition, as these amounts are neither estimable nor, in the opinion of management, material to our financial position or results of operations. Of our total revenues,
$2,411,000
,
$2,497,000
and
$2,604,000
were recognized as rental income from the portfolio for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Disposition of Assets
On March 22, 2016, we sold a skilled nursing facility in Idaho for cash consideration of
$3,000,000
. The carrying value of the facility was
$1,346,000
, and we recorded a gain of
$1,654,000
. As discussed above in connection with The Ensign Group, we sold
two
skilled nursing facilities in May 2016 for total consideration of
$24,600,000
and realized a gain of
$2,805,000
on the disposal. In June 2016, we recognized a gain of
$123,000
on the sale of a vacant land parcel.
Future Minimum Lease Payments
At
December 31, 2016
, the future minimum lease payments (excluding percentage rent) to be received by us under our operating leases with our tenants are as follows (
in thousands
):
|
2017
|
$
|
220,416
|
|
|
|
2018
|
213,157
|
|
||
|
2019
|
209,711
|
|
||
|
2020
|
206,856
|
|
||
|
2021
|
207,718
|
|
||
|
Thereafter
|
1,585,696
|
|
||
|
$
|
2,643,554
|
|
||
65
Our equity-method investment in OpCo and other assets consist of the following (
in thousands
):
|
As of December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||
|
Equity-method investment in OpCo
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
7,657
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
9,017
|
|
3,260
|
|
|||
|
Regulatory deposits
|
8,208
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Replacement reserve and tax escrows
|
4,046
|
|
4,627
|
|
|||
|
$
|
21,271
|
|
$
|
15,544
|
|
||
As discussed in Note 2, we disposed of our equity method investment in OpCo on September 30, 2016. From the inception of our equity-method investment in September 2012, no distributions of net income from OpCo were made to NHI, and, accordingly, adjustments to our carrying cost reflect only our pro-rata share of earnings and losses in the entity and allocations of any additional cost. NHI’s gain of
$1,657,000
from the sale of OpCo was calculated on the difference between the proceeds of
$8,100,000
and the carrying amount of our equity-method investment of
$6,443,000
. Tax effects related to the transaction include the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards and the write-off of residual deferred tax assets totaling
$1,192,000
.
Reserves for replacement and tax escrows include amounts required to be held on deposit in accordance with regulatory agreements governing our Fannie Mae and HUD mortgages.
With the adoption of ASU 2015-03,
Interest-Imputation of Interest
, in the first quarter of 2016, the balance in Other Assets was reduced to reflect the reclassification of our unamortized loan costs which are now being offset against the loan balances as shown in Note 6.
At
December 31, 2016
, we had investments in mortgage notes receivable with a carrying value of
$99,179,000
secured by real estate and UCC liens on the personal property of
8
facilities and other notes receivable with a carrying value of
$34,314,000
guaranteed by significant parties to the notes or by cross-collateralization of properties with the same owner. At
December 31, 2015
, we had investments in mortgage notes receivable with a carrying value of
$101,124,000
and other notes receivable with a carrying value of
$32,590,000
.
No
allowance for doubtful accounts was considered necessary at
December 31, 2016
or
2015
.
Timber Ridge
In February 2015, we entered into an agreement to lend up to
$154,500,000
to LCS-Westminster Partnership III LLP (“LCS-WP”), an affiliate of Life Care Services (“LCS”) . The loan agreement conveys a mortgage interest and will facilitate the construction of Phase II of Timber Ridge at Talus (“Timber Ridge”), a Type-A Continuing Care Retirement Community in Issaquah, WA managed by LCS. Our loan to LCS-WP represents a variable interest. As an affiliate of a larger company, LCS-WP is structured to limit liability for potential damage claims, is capitalized to achieve that purpose and is considered a VIE.
The loan takes the form of
two
notes under a master credit agreement. The senior note (“Note A”) totals
$60,000,000
at a
6.75%
interest rate with
10
basis-point escalators after year
three
, and has a term of
10
years. We have funded
$42,944,000
of Note A as of
December 31, 2016
. Note A is interest-only and is locked to prepayment for
three
years. After year three, the prepayment penalty starts at
5%
and declines
1%
per year. The second note (“Note B”) is a construction loan for up to
$94,500,000
at an annual interest rate of
8%
and a
five
-year maturity and was fully drawn in
2016
. We began receiving repayment with new resident entrance fees upon the opening of Phase II during the fourth quarter of 2016. Repayment of Note B amounted to
$61,289,000
as of December 31, 2016, plus an additional
$7,304,000
through February 15, 2017.
NHI has a purchase option on the entire Timber Ridge property for the greater of fair market value or
$115,000,000
during a purchase option window of
120 days
that will contingently open in year
five
or upon earlier stabilization of the development, as defined.
66
Senior Living Communities
In connection with the acquisition in December 2014 of the properties leased to Senior Living, we provided a
$15,000,000
revolving line of credit, the maturity of which mirrors the
15
-year term of the master lease. Borrowings are used to finance construction projects within the Senior Living portfolio, including building additional units. Up to
$5,000,000
of the facility may be used to meet general working capital needs. Amounts outstanding under the facility,
$4,743,000
at
December 31, 2016
, bear interest at an annual rate equal to the prevailing
10
-year U.S. Treasury rate,
2.45%
at
December 31, 2016
, plus
6%
.
In March 2016, we extended
two
mezzanine loans of up to
$12,000,000
and
$2,000,000
, respectively, to affiliates of Senior Living, to partially fund construction of a
186
-unit senior living campus on Daniel Island in South Carolina. The loans bear interest payable monthly at a
10%
annual rate and mature in March 2021. The loans have a total balance of
$10,778,000
at
December 31, 2016
, and provide NHI with a purchase option on the development upon its meeting certain operational metrics. The option is to remain open during the term of the loans, plus any extensions.
Our loans to Senior Living and its subsidiaries represent a variable interest as does our lease, which is considered to be analogous to a financing arrangement. Senior Living is structured to limit liability for potential claims for damages, is appropriately capitalized for that purpose and is considered a VIE.
Senior Living Management
On August 3, 2016, we entered into an agreement to furnish to our current tenant, Senior Living Management, Inc. (“SLM”), through its affiliates, loans of up to
$24,500,000
to facilitate SLM’s acquisition of
five
senior housing facilities that it currently operates. The loans consist of
two
notes under a master credit agreement, include both a mortgage and a corporate loan, and bear interest at
8.25%
with terms of
five
years, plus optional
one
and
two
-year extensions. NHI has a right of first refusal if SLM elects to sell the facilities. The total amount funded was
$12,556,000
as of
December 31, 2016
, with the remainder of the loan funded in January 2017.
Our loans to SLM represent a variable interest as do our leases, which are analogous to financing arrangements. SLM is structured to limit liability for potential damage claims, is capitalized for that purpose and is considered a VIE.
Bickford
On July 15, 2016, NHI extended a construction loan facility of up to
$14,000,000
to Bickford for the purpose of developing and operating an assisted living/memory care community in Illinois. The total amount funded as of
December 31, 2016
was
$2,413,000
, interest is to accrue at
9%
, and the loan is to mature on July 15, 2021. The promissory note is secured by a first mortgage lien on substantially all real and personal property as well as a pledge of any and all leases or agreements which may grant a right of use to the subject property. Usual and customary covenants extend to the agreement, including the borrower’s obligation for payment of insurance and taxes.
Our loan to Bickford represents a variable interest as do our leases, which are considered to be analogous to financing arrangements. Bickford is structured to limit liability for potential claims for damages, is capitalized to achieve that purpose and is considered a VIE.
Sycamore
As discussed in Note 2, on June 1, 2016,
two
notes receivable from Sycamore, an affiliate of Bickford, having an aggregate principal and accrued interest balance of
$9,753,000
were retired as part of an asset acquisition. As of
December 31, 2016
, our direct support of Sycamore is limited to our guarantee on a
$3,930,000
letter of credit established for their benefit. Sycamore, as an affiliate company of Bickford, is structured to limit liability for potential claims for damages, is capitalized to achieve that purpose and is considered a VIE.
Repayments
In January 2016 we received full payment from an affiliate of our current lessee, Discovery Senior Living, on a
$2,500,000
second mortgage loan we originally provided in October 2013 for the construction of a senior housing community in Naples, Florida. In November 2016 affiliates of American Healthcare Corporation paid off undiscounted balances of
$4,685,000
on
two
mortgage notes outstanding. As of
December 31, 2016
, receivable balances on the
four
remaining notes from affiliates of American Health Care Corp. totaled
$8,129,000
, net of related discounts of
$541,000
.
67
Writedowns and Recoveries
In June 2015 we received
$491,000
as a secured creditor in the final settlement of a bankruptcy proceeding and recorded a recovery of a previous write-down.
As of
December 31, 2016
, our investments in marketable securities include available-for-sale equity securities which are reported at fair value. As of
December 31, 2015
our investments also included marketable debt securities, classified as available-for-sale, consisting of U.S. government agency debt and long-term certificates of deposit. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are presented as components of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses from securities sales are determined based upon specific identification of the securities.
Marketable securities consist of the following (
in thousands
):
|
December 31, 2016
|
December 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
||||||||
|
Common stock of other healthcare REITs
|
$
|
1,680
|
|
$
|
11,745
|
|
$
|
21,040
|
|
$
|
55,815
|
|
|||
|
Debt securities
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
17,037
|
|
$
|
16,929
|
|
|||
Net unrealized gains related to available-for-sale securities were
$10,065,000
at
December 31, 2016
and
$34,667,000
at
December 31, 2015
. During the
year ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, we recognized gains on sales of marketable securities of
$29,673,000
and
$23,529,000
, respectively, which were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and are included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as Investment and other gains. We sold no securities in 2014.
During
2016
,
2015
and
2014
we recognized
$1,697,000
,
$1,330,000
, and
$716,000
, respectively, of dividend and interest income from our marketable securities and have included these amounts in investment income and other in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Debt consists of the following (
in thousands
):
|
As of December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||
|
Revolving credit facility - unsecured
|
158,000
|
|
34,000
|
|
|||
|
Bank term loans - unsecured
|
250,000
|
|
250,000
|
|
|||
|
Private placement term loans - unsecured
|
400,000
|
|
325,000
|
|
|||
|
Convertible senior notes - unsecured (net of discount of $4,717 and $5,862)
|
195,283
|
|
194,138
|
|
|||
|
HUD mortgage loans (net of discount of $1,487 and $1,573)
|
44,354
|
|
45,035
|
|
|||
|
Fannie Mae term loans - secured
|
78,084
|
|
78,084
|
|
|||
|
Unamortized loan costs
|
(9,740
|
)
|
(11,814
|
)
|
|||
|
$
|
1,115,981
|
|
$
|
914,443
|
|
||
68
Aggregate principal maturities of debt as of
December 31, 2016
for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows (
in thousands
):
|
Twelve months ended December 31
|
|||
|
2017
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
2018
|
821
|
|
|
|
2019
|
849
|
|
|
|
2020
|
408,878
|
|
|
|
2021
|
200,908
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
519,675
|
|
|
|
1,131,925
|
|
||
|
Less: discount
|
(6,204
|
)
|
|
|
Less: unamortized loan costs
|
(9,740
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,115,981
|
|
|
As amended in June 2015, our
$800,000,000
senior unsecured credit facility with a group of banks provides for: (1) revolving credit of
$550,000,000
maturing in June 2020 (inclusive of an embedded
1
-year extension option) with interest at
150
basis points over LIBOR (
77
bps at
December 31, 2016
); (2) an existing
$130,000,000
term loan that matures in June 2020 with interest at
175
basis points over LIBOR; and (3)
two
existing term loans which remain in place totaling
$120,000,000
, maturing in June 2020 and bearing interest at
175
basis points over LIBOR. The employment of interest rate swaps for our fixed term debt leaves only our revolving credit facility exposed to variable rate risk. Our swaps and the financial instruments to which they relate are described in the table below, under the caption “Interest Rate Swap Agreements.”
At
December 31, 2016
we had
$392,000,000
available to draw on the revolving portion of the credit facility. The unused commitment fee is
40
basis points per annum. The unsecured credit facility requires that we maintain certain financial ratios within limits set by our creditors. To date, these ratios, which are calculated quarterly, have been within the limits required by the credit facility agreements.
Pinnacle Bank is a participating member of our banking group. A member of NHI’s board of directors and chairman of our audit committee is also the chairman of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., the holding company for Pinnacle Bank. NHI's local banking transactions are conducted primarily through Pinnacle Bank.
Our unsecured private placement term loans are summarized below:
|
Amount
|
Maturity
|
Rate
|
||||
|
$
|
125,000,000
|
|
January 2023
|
3.99%
|
||
|
50,000,000
|
|
November 2023
|
3.99%
|
|||
|
75,000,000
|
|
September 2024
|
3.93%
|
|||
|
50,000,000
|
|
November 2025
|
4.33%
|
|||
|
100,000,000
|
|
January 2027
|
4.51%
|
|||
|
$
|
400,000,000
|
|
||||
Terms and conditions of above term loans are similar to those under our bank credit facility with the exception of provisions regarding prepayment premiums.
In March 2015 we obtained
$78,084,000
in Fannie Mae financing. The term debt financing consists of interest-only payments at an annual rate of
3.79%
and a
10
-year maturity. The mortgages are non-recourse and secured by
thirteen
properties leased to Bickford. Proceeds were used to reduce borrowings on NHI’s unsecured bank credit facility. The notes are secured by facilities having a net book value of
$111,091,000
at
December 31, 2016
, that were previously pledged as security on Fannie Mae term debt retired in December 2014.
In March 2014 we issued
$200,000,000
of
3.25%
senior unsecured convertible notes due April 2021 (the “Notes”). Interest is payable April 1st and October 1st of each year. As adjusted for terms of the indenture, the Notes are convertible at a conversion rate of
14.10
shares of common stock per
$1,000
principal amount, representing a conversion price of approximately
$70.93
per share for a total of approximately
2,819,785
underlying shares. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence
69
of certain events, as defined in the indenture governing the Notes, but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest except in limited circumstances. The conversion option is considered an “optional net-share settlement conversion feature,” meaning that upon conversion, NHI’s conversion obligation may be satisfied, at our option, in cash, shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock. Because we have the ability and intent to settle the convertible securities in cash upon exercise, we use the treasury stock method to account for potential dilution. For
2016
, dilution resulting from the conversion option within our convertible debt is determined by computing an average of incremental shares included in each quarterly diluted EPS computation, resulting in a dilutive effect for the conversion feature of
89,471
shares for the year ended
December 31, 2016
. If NHI’s current share price increases above the adjusted
$70.93
conversion price, further dilution will be attributable to the conversion feature. On December 31, 2016, the value of the convertible debt, computed as if the debt were immediately eligible for conversion, exceeded its face amount by
$9,137,000
.
The embedded conversion options (1) do not require net cash settlement, (2) are not conventionally convertible but can be classified in stockholders’ equity under ASC 815-40, and (3) are considered indexed to NHI’s own stock. Therefore, the conversion feature satisfies the conditions to qualify for an exception to the derivative liability rules, and the Notes are split into debt and equity components. The value of the debt component is based upon the estimated fair value of a similar debt instrument without the conversion feature at the time of issuance and was estimated to be approximately
$192,238,000
. The
$7,762,000
difference between the contractual principal on the debt and the value allocated to the debt was recorded as the equity component and represents the estimated value of the conversion feature of the instrument. The excess of the contractual principal amount of the debt over its estimated fair value, the original issue discount, is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the estimated term of the Notes. The effective interest rate used to amortize the debt discount and the liability component of the debt issue costs was approximately
3.9%
based on our estimated non-convertible borrowing rate at the date the Notes were issued.
The total cost of issuing the Notes was
$6,063,000
,
$275,000
of which was allocated to the equity component and
$5,788,000
of which was allocated to the debt component and subject to amortization over the estimated term of the notes. The remaining unamortized balance at
December 31, 2016
, was
$3,234,000
.
Our HUD mortgage loans are secured by
ten
properties leased to Bickford and having a net book value of
$54,317,000
at December 31, 2016.
Nine
mortgage notes require monthly payments of principal and interest from
4.3%
to
4.4%
(inclusive of mortgage insurance premium) and mature in August and October 2049.
One
additional HUD mortgage loan assumed in 2014 requires monthly payments of principal and interest of
2.9%
(inclusive of mortgage insurance premium) and matures in October 2047. The loan has an outstanding principal balance of
$9,113,000
and a net book value of
$7,573,000
, which approximates fair value.
The following table summarizes interest expense (
in thousands
):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Interest paid at contractual rates
|
$
|
40,143
|
|
$
|
34,573
|
|
$
|
23,878
|
|
||
|
Capitalized interest
|
(549
|
)
|
(357
|
)
|
(576
|
)
|
|||||
|
Amortization of debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs
|
3,514
|
|
3,413
|
|
2,580
|
|
|||||
|
Unamortized debt premium written off as a result of debt payoff
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|||||
|
Debt issuance costs expensed due to credit facility modifications
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,145
|
|
|||||
|
Total interest expense
|
$
|
43,108
|
|
$
|
37,629
|
|
$
|
26,372
|
|
||
Amounts residual in other comprehensive income totaling
$3,928,000
,
$4,498,000
and
$4,136,000
at the beginning of the years presented above were reclassified into interest expense during
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements to fix the interest rates on our bank term loans. For instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), and reclassified into earnings in the same period, or periods, during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings. Hedge ineffectiveness related to our cash flow hedges, which is reported in current period earnings as interest expense, was not significant for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
or
2014
. Approximately
$2,680,000
of losses, which are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, are projected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months.
70
Below is a summary of our swap agreements at
December 31, 2016
(
dollars in thousands
):
|
Date Entered
|
Maturity Date
|
Fixed Rate
|
Rate Index
|
Notional Amount
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||
|
May 2012
|
April 2019
|
3.29%
|
1-month LIBOR
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
$
|
(187
|
)
|
|||||
|
June 2013
|
June 2020
|
3.86%
|
1-month LIBOR
|
$
|
80,000
|
|
$
|
(1,479
|
)
|
|||||
|
March 2014
|
June 2020
|
3.91%
|
1-month LIBOR
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
$
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|||||
If the fair value of the hedge is an asset, we include it in our Consolidated Balance Sheets among other assets, and, if a liability, as a component of accrued expenses. See Note 14 for fair value disclosures about our interest rate swap agreements. Liability balances for our hedges included as components of consolidated other comprehensive income on December 31, 2015 and 2014 were
$6,730,000
and
$5,193,000
, respectively.
In the normal course of business, we enter into a variety of commitments, typical of which are those for the funding of revolving credit arrangements, construction and mezzanine loans to our operators to conduct expansions and acquisitions for their own account, and commitments for the funding of construction for expansion or renovation to our existing properties under lease. In our leasing operations we offer to our tenants and to sellers of newly-acquired properties a variety of inducements which originate contractually as contingencies but which may become commitments upon the satisfaction of the contingent event. Contingent payments earned will be included in the respective lease bases when funded. The tables below summarize our existing, known commitments and contingencies according to the nature of their impact on our leasehold or loan portfolios.
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Loan Commitments:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Life Care Services Note A
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
$
|
60,000,000
|
|
$
|
(42,944,000
|
)
|
$
|
17,056,000
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
14,000,000
|
|
(2,413,000
|
)
|
11,587,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Senior Living Communities
|
SHO
|
Revolving Credit
|
29,000,000
|
|
(15,639,000
|
)
|
13,361,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Senior Living Management
|
SHO
|
Mezzanine
|
24,500,000
|
|
(12,556,000
|
)
|
11,944,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
127,500,000
|
|
$
|
(73,552,000
|
)
|
$
|
53,948,000
|
|
|||||||
See Note 4 for full details of our loan commitments. As provided above, loans funded do not include the effects of discounts or commitment fees. We expect to fully fund the Life Care Services Note A during 2017. Funding of the promissory note commitment to Bickford is expected to transpire monthly throughout 2017. Our remaining loan commitment to Senior Living Management was funded in January 2017.
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Development Commitments:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Legend/The Ensign Group
|
SNF
|
Purchase
|
$
|
56,000,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
56,000,000
|
|
||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
55,000,000
|
|
(49,097,000
|
)
|
5,903,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Chancellor Health Care
|
SHO
|
Construction
|
650,000
|
|
(52,000
|
)
|
598,000
|
|
|||||||
|
East Lake/Watermark Retirement
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
10,000,000
|
|
(3,450,000
|
)
|
6,550,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Santé Partners
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
3,500,000
|
|
(2,621,000
|
)
|
879,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
2,400,000
|
|
—
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
|||||||
|
East Lake Capital Management
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
400,000
|
|
—
|
|
400,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Woodland Village
|
SHO
|
Renovation
|
350,000
|
|
(227,000
|
)
|
123,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
128,300,000
|
|
$
|
(55,447,000
|
)
|
$
|
72,853,000
|
|
|||||||
Our development commitments are more fully described in Note 2.
We are obligated to purchase, from a developer, four new skilled nursing facilities in Texas for
$56,000,000
which are leased to Legend and subleased to Ensign. The purchase window for the first facility is open through February 2017. The other
three
facilities are under construction by the developer.
We have committed to the development of
five
senior housing facilities in Illinois and Virginia to be managed by Bickford, each consisting of
60
private-pay assisted living and memory care units. Total costs funded includes land and development costs
71
incurred on the project as of December 31, 2016.
One
facility opened in July 2016,
two
opened in October 2016, and
two
are planned to open in the first half of 2017.
In addition to smaller ongoing renovation commitments, which will be included in the lease base when funded, in 2014 we provided a
$15,000,000
revolving line of credit to Senior Living, the maturity of which mirrors the
15
-year term of the master lease also dating from 2014. While borrowings are used within the Senior Living portfolio to finance construction projects, including building additional units, up to
$5,000,000
of the facility may be used to meet general working-capital needs. In March 2016, we extended two additional mezzanine loans totaling
$14,000,000
to affiliates of Senior Living, to partially fund construction of a 186-unit senior living campus on Daniel Island in South Carolina.
|
Asset Class
|
Type
|
Total
|
Funded
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
|
Contingencies:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
East Lake Capital Management
|
SHO
|
Lease Inducement
|
$
|
8,000,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
8,000,000
|
|
||||
|
Sycamore Street (Bickford affiliate)
|
SHO
|
Letter-of-credit
|
3,930,000
|
|
—
|
|
3,930,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bickford Senior Living
|
SHO
|
Construction Loan
|
2,000,000
|
|
—
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|||||||
|
$
|
13,930,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
13,930,000
|
|
|||||||
In connection with our July 2015 lease to East Lake of three senior housing properties, NHI has committed to certain lease inducement payments of
$8,000,000
contingent on reaching and maintaining certain metrics, which have been assessed as not probable of payment and which we have not recorded on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. We are unaware of circumstances that would change our initial assessment as to the contingent lease incentives. Not included in the above table is a seller earnout of
$750,000
, which is recorded on our balance sheet within accounts payable and accrued expenses.
In February 2014 we entered into a commitment on a letter of credit for the benefit of Sycamore, an affiliate of Bickford, which previously held a minority interest in PropCo. At
December 31, 2016
, our commitment on the letter of credit totaled
$3,930,000
. In connection with our funding commitment for the Illinois project discussed among loan commitments above, Bickford may also borrow an additional
$2,000,000
upon achieving certain operating performance metrics.
Litigation
Our facilities are subject to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. Our lessees and borrowers have indemnified, and are obligated to continue to indemnify us, against all liabilities arising from the operation of the facilities, and are further obligated to indemnify us against environmental or title problems affecting the real estate underlying such facilities. While there may be lawsuits pending against certain of the owners and/or lessees of the facilities, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending proceedings will have no material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The following table summarizes our investment and other gains
(in thousands)
:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Gains on sales of marketable securities
|
29,673
|
|
23,529
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of real estate
|
4,582
|
|
1,126
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other gains
|
1,657
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
$
|
35,912
|
|
$
|
24,655
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
We recognize share-based compensation for all stock options granted over the requisite service period using the fair value of these grants as estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model, and all restricted stock granted over the requisite service period using the market value of our publicly-traded common stock on the date of grant.
72
Share-Based Compensation Plans
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“the Committee”) has the authority to select the participants to be granted options; to designate whether the option granted is an incentive stock option (“ISO”), a non-qualified option, or a stock appreciation right; to establish the number of shares of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of the option; to establish the vesting provision for any award; and to establish the term any award may be outstanding. The exercise price of any ISO’s granted will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date granted and the term of an ISO may not be more than ten years. The exercise price of any non-qualified options granted will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date granted unless so determined by the Committee.
In May 2012, our stockholders approved the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 2012 Plan”) pursuant to which
1,500,000
shares of our common stock were made available to grant as share-based payments to employees, officers, directors or consultants. Through a vote of our shareholders in May 2015, we increased the maximum number of shares under the plan from
1,500,000
shares to
3,000,000
shares; increased the automatic annual grant to non-employee directors from
15,000
shares to
20,000
shares; and limited the Company’s ability to re-issue shares under the Plan. As of
December 31, 2016
, there were
1,446,668
shares available for future grants under the 2012 Plan. The individual restricted stock and option grant awards vest over periods up to
five
years. The term of the options under the 2012 Plan is up to
ten
years from the date of grant.
In May 2005, our stockholders approved the NHI 2005 Stock Option Plan (“the 2005 Plan”) pursuant to which
1,500,000
shares of our common stock were made available to grant as share-based payments to employees, officers, directors or consultants. As of December 31, 2015, the 2005 Plan has expired and
no
additional shares may be granted under the 2005 Plan. The individual restricted stock and option grant awards vest over periods up to
ten
years. The term of the options outstanding under the 2005 Plan is up to
ten
years from the date of grant.
Compensation expense is recognized only for the awards that ultimately vest. Accordingly, forfeitures that were not expected may result in the reversal of previously recorded compensation expense. We consider the historical employee turnover rate in our estimate of the number of stock option forfeitures. Our compensation expense reported for the
years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
was
$1,732,000
,
$2,134,000
and
$2,020,000
, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Determining Fair Value of Option Awards
The fair value of each option award was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the weighted average assumptions indicated in the following table. Each grant is valued as a single award with an expected term based upon expected employee and termination behavior. Compensation cost is recognized on the graded vesting method over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards. The expected volatility is derived using daily historical data for periods preceding the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is the approximate yield on the United States Treasury Strips having a life equal to the expected option life on the date of grant. The expected life is an estimate of the number of years an option will be held before it is exercised.
Stock Options
The weighted average fair value per share of options granted was
$3.65
,
$4.74
and
$4.93
for
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively.
The fair value of each grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||
|
Dividend yield
|
6.2%
|
4.7%
|
5.0%
|
||
|
Expected volatility
|
19.1%
|
17.8%
|
21.5%
|
||
|
Expected lives
|
2.9 years
|
2.8 years
|
2.8 years
|
||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.91%
|
0.98%
|
0.63%
|
||
73
Stock Option Activity
The following tables summarize our outstanding stock options:
|
Weighted Average
|
||||||||||
|
Number
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|
|||||
|
of Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
Contractual Life (Years)
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|||||
|
Outstanding December 31, 2013
|
516,674
|
|
$59.20
|
|||||||
|
Options granted under 2012 Plan
|
400,000
|
|
$61.31
|
|||||||
|
Options exercised under 2005 Plan
|
(26,670
|
)
|
$47.52
|
|||||||
|
Options exercised under 2012 Plan
|
(3,333
|
)
|
$61.31
|
|||||||
|
Options forfeited under 2005 Plan
|
(15,000
|
)
|
$64.49
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding December 31, 2014
|
871,671
|
|
$60.43
|
|||||||
|
Options granted under 2005 Plan
|
20,000
|
|
$72.11
|
|||||||
|
Options granted under 2012 Plan
|
450,000
|
|
$72.11
|
|||||||
|
Options exercised under 2005 Plan
|
(66,670
|
)
|
$46.87
|
|||||||
|
Options exercised under 2012 Plan
|
(421,657
|
)
|
$63.03
|
|||||||
|
Options canceled under 2012 Plan
|
(111,668
|
)
|
$71.95
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding December 31, 2015
|
741,676
|
|
$65.84
|
|||||||
|
Options granted under 2012 Plan
|
470,000
|
|
$60.78
|
|||||||
|
Options exercised under 2005 Plan
|
(61,666
|
)
|
$52.36
|
|||||||
|
Options exercised under 2012 Plan
|
(608,331
|
)
|
$65.18
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding December 31, 2016
|
541,679
|
|
$63.73
|
3.44
|
$
|
5,657,000
|
|
|||
|
Exercisable December 31, 2016
|
188,331
|
|
$63.56
|
2.61
|
$
|
1,998,000
|
|
|||
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||
|
Grant
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Contractual
|
||||
|
Date
|
of Shares
|
|
Price
|
|
Life in Years
|
||||
|
2/21/2012
|
15,000
|
|
$
|
47.52
|
|
0.14
|
|||
|
2/25/2013
|
15,000
|
|
$
|
64.49
|
|
1.15
|
|||
|
2/25/2014
|
65,000
|
|
$
|
61.31
|
|
2.15
|
|||
|
2/20/2015
|
150,007
|
|
$
|
72.11
|
|
3.14
|
|||
|
2/22/2016
|
270,005
|
|
$
|
60.52
|
|
4.15
|
|||
|
3/8/2016
|
26,667
|
|
$
|
63.63
|
|
4.19
|
|||
|
Outstanding December 31, 2016
|
541,679
|
|
|||||||
The weighted average remaining contractual life of all options outstanding at
December 31, 2016
is
3.4 years
. Including outstanding stock options, our stockholders have authorized an additional
1,988,347
shares of common stock that may be issued under the share-based payments plans.
74
The following table summarizes our outstanding non-vested stock options:
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
||
|
Non-vested December 31, 2015
|
265,013
|
|
$4.98
|
|
|
Options granted under 2012 Plan
|
470,000
|
|
$3.65
|
|
|
Options vested under 2012 Plan
|
(374,999
|
)
|
$4.48
|
|
|
Options vested under 2005 Plan
|
(6,666
|
)
|
$4.91
|
|
|
Non-vested December 31, 2016
|
353,348
|
|
$3.99
|
|
At
December 31, 2016
, we had
$399,000
of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, net of expected forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over the following periods:
2017
-
$360,000
and
2018
-
$39,000
. Stock-based compensation is included in general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The intrinsic value of the total options exercised for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
was
$4,730,000
or
$7.06
per share;
$5,551,000
or
$12.69
per share, and
$465,000
or
$15.51
per share, respectively.
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period is used to calculate basic earnings per common share. Diluted earnings per common share assume the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted shares using the treasury stock method, to the extent dilutive. Dilution resulting from the conversion option within our convertible debt is determined by computing an average of incremental shares included in each quarterly diluted EPS computation. If NHI’s current share price increases above the adjusted conversion price, further dilution will be attributable to the conversion feature.
The following table summarizes the average number of common shares and the net income used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
151,540
|
|
$
|
148,862
|
|
$
|
101,609
|
|
||
|
BASIC:
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
39,013,412
|
|
37,604,594
|
|
33,375,966
|
|
|||||
|
DILUTED:
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
39,013,412
|
|
37,604,594
|
|
33,375,966
|
|
|||||
|
Stock options and restricted shares
|
52,497
|
|
34,842
|
|
40,048
|
|
|||||
|
Convertible senior notes - unsecured
|
89,471
|
|
4,735
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Average dilutive common shares outstanding
|
39,155,380
|
|
37,644,171
|
|
33,416,014
|
|
|||||
|
Net income per common share - basic
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
||
|
Net income per common share - diluted
|
$
|
3.87
|
|
$
|
3.95
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
||
|
Net share effect of anti-dilutive stock options
|
6,366
|
|
51,603
|
|
13,831
|
|
|||||
|
Regular dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
$
|
3.08
|
|
||
Beginning with our inception in 1991, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). We have elected that our subsidiary established on September 30, 2012 in connection with the Bickford arrangement (which previously held our ownership interest in an operating company) be taxed as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) under provisions of the Code. The TRS is subject to federal and state income taxes like those applicable to regular corporations. As discussed in
75
Note 2, we terminated our participation in the joint venture resident in our TRS on September 30, 2016. Aside from such income taxes which have been applicable to any taxable income in the TRS, we will not be subject to federal income tax provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT and make distributions to stockholders equal to or in excess of 90% of our taxable income.
Per share dividend payments to common stockholders for the last three years are characterized for tax purposes as follows:
|
(Unaudited)
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||||
|
Ordinary income
|
$
|
2.67863
|
|
$
|
2.62808
|
|
$
|
2.5355
|
|
||
|
Capital gain
|
0.92137
|
|
0.69110
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Return of capital
|
—
|
|
0.08082
|
|
0.54452
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends paid per common share
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
$
|
3.08
|
|
||
Our consolidated provision for state and federal income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended
2016
,
2015
, and
2014
was
$854,000
,
$(583,000)
, and
$118,000
, respectively. For the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, we had
no
material deferred state or federal income tax. For
2016
, we recognized
$707,000
of deferred federal and state taxes and
$42,000
of current tax expense. Of the deferred tax expense recognized,
$462,000
related to a full valuation allowance applied to remaining unused federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards on our Taxable REIT Subsidiary.
All of our income tax expense for
2015
and
2014
relates to a franchise tax levied by the state of Texas that has attributes of an income tax. For 2015, we recorded a Federal income tax benefit of
$(707,000)
related to losses in our operating subsidiary, offset primarily by Texas Franchise taxes of
$124,000
resulting in the net income tax benefit disclosed above of
$(583,000)
. Our state income taxes described above are combined in franchise, excise and other taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Income taxes related to the equity interest in the unconsolidated operating company whose interest is owned by our TRS are included in our Consolidated Statements of Income under the caption Income tax benefit (expense) of taxable REIT subsidiary.
We made state income tax payments of
$30,000
,
$122,000
,and
$139,000
for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively.
Our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value (based on the hierarchy of the three levels of inputs described in Note 1) on a recurring basis include marketable securities, derivative financial instruments and certain contingent consideration arrangements. Marketable securities consist of common stock of other healthcare REITs. Derivative financial instruments include our interest rate swap agreements. Contingent consideration arrangements relate to certain provisions of recent real estate purchase agreements involving business combinations.
Marketable securities.
We utilize quoted prices in active markets to measure debt and equity securities; these items are classified as Level 1 in the hierarchy and include the common stock of other healthcare REITs.
Derivative financial instruments
. Derivative financial instruments are valued in the market using discounted cash flow techniques. These techniques incorporate primarily Level 2 inputs. The market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument’s term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk. Significant inputs to the derivative valuation model for interest rate swaps are observable in active markets and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy.
Contingent consideration.
Contingent consideration arrangements are classified as Level 3 and are valued using unobservable inputs about the nature of the contingent arrangement and the counter-party to the arrangement, as well as our assumptions about the probability of full settlement of the contingency.
76
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
Fair Value Measurement
|
|||||||||
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
December 31,
2016 |
December 31,
2015 |
|||||||
|
Level 1
|
|||||||||
|
Common stock of other healthcare REITs
|
Marketable securities
|
$
|
11,745
|
|
$
|
55,815
|
|
||
|
Debt securities
|
Marketable securities
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
16,929
|
|
||
|
Level 2
|
|||||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability
|
Accrued expenses
|
$
|
4,279
|
|
$
|
6,730
|
|
||
Carrying values and fair values of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows (
in thousands
):
|
Carrying Amount
|
Fair Value Measurement
|
||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||||||
|
Level 2
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Variable rate debt
|
$
|
404,828
|
|
$
|
279,745
|
|
$
|
408,000
|
|
$
|
284,000
|
|
|||
|
Fixed rate debt
|
$
|
711,153
|
|
$
|
634,698
|
|
$
|
706,332
|
|
$
|
641,066
|
|
|||
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage and other notes receivable
|
$
|
133,493
|
|
$
|
133,714
|
|
$
|
133,229
|
|
$
|
141,408
|
|
|||
The fair value of mortgage and other notes receivable is based on credit risk and discount rates that are not observable in the marketplace and therefore represents a Level 3 measurement.
Fixed rate debt is classified as Level 2 and its value is based on quoted prices for similar instruments or calculated utilizing model derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable in active markets.
Carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of our borrowings under our credit facility are reasonably estimated at their carrying value at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, due to the predominance of floating interest rates, which generally reflect market conditions.
The Company’s charter contains certain provisions which are designed to ensure that the Company’s status as a REIT is protected for federal income tax purposes. One of these provisions ensures that any transfer which would cause NHI to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons or would cause NHI to be “closely held” under the Internal Revenue Code would be void which, subject to certain exceptions, results in no stockholder being allowed to own, either directly or indirectly pursuant to certain tax attribution rules, more than
9.9%
of the Company’s common stock. In 1991, the Board created an exception to this ownership limitation for Dr. Carl E. Adams, his spouse, Jennie Mae Adams, and their lineal descendants. Effective May 12, 2008, we entered into Excepted Holder Agreements with W. Andrew Adams and certain members of his family. These written agreements are intended to restate and replace the parties’ prior verbal agreement. Based on the Excepted Holder Agreements currently outstanding, the ownership limit for all other stockholders is approximately
7.5%
. Our charter gives our Board of Directors broad powers to prohibit and rescind any attempted transfer in violation of the ownership limits. These agreements were entered into in connection with the Company’s stock purchase program pursuant to which the Company announced that it would purchase up to
1,000,000
shares of its common stock in the public market from its stockholders.
A separate agreement was entered into with each of the spouse and children of Dr. Carl E. Adams and others within Mr. W. Andrew Adams’ family. We needed to enter into such an agreement with each family member because of the complicated ownership attribution rules under Internal Revenue Code. The Agreement permits the Excepted Holders to own common stock in excess of
9.9%
up to the limit specifically provided in the individual agreement and not lose rights with respect to such shares. However, if the stockholder’s stock ownership exceeds the limit then such shares in excess of the limit become “Excess Stock” and lose voting rights and entitlement to receive dividends. The Excess Stock classification remains in place until the stockholder no longer exceeds the threshold limit specified in the Agreement. The purpose of these agreements is to ensure that the Company does not violate the prohibition against a REIT being closely held. W. Andrew Adams’ Excess Holder Agreement also provides that he will
77
not own shares of stock in any tenant of the Company if such ownership would cause the Company to constructively own more than a
9.9%
interest in such tenant. This prohibition is designed to protect the Company’s status as a REIT for tax purposes.
The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data for the two most recent fiscal years (
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
.
|
2016
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
59,018
|
|
$
|
61,204
|
|
$
|
63,251
|
|
$
|
65,027
|
|
|||
|
Investment and other gains
|
1,665
|
|
26,415
|
|
1,657
|
|
6,175
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
32,725
|
|
$
|
44,595
|
|
$
|
33,032
|
|
$
|
41,188
|
|
|||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
38,401,647
|
|
38,520,221
|
|
39,283,919
|
|
39,847,860
|
|
|||||||
|
Diluted
|
38,414,791
|
|
38,561,384
|
|
39,651,900
|
|
39,993,445
|
|
|||||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic
|
$
|
.85
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
$
|
.84
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders - diluted
|
$
|
.85
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|||
|
2015
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
55,751
|
|
$
|
56,313
|
|
$
|
58,282
|
|
$
|
58,642
|
|
|||
|
Investment and other gains
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,126
|
|
23,529
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
29,683
|
|
$
|
31,182
|
|
$
|
33,600
|
|
$
|
54,397
|
|
|||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
37,558,067
|
|
37,566,221
|
|
37,566,221
|
|
37,727,868
|
|
|||||||
|
Diluted
|
37,645,265
|
|
37,607,117
|
|
37,583,141
|
|
37,741,162
|
|
|||||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic
|
$
|
.79
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
$
|
.89
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders - diluted
|
$
|
.79
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
$
|
.89
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|||
78
In May 2014 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
. ASU 2014-09 provides a principles-based approach for a broad range of revenue generating transactions, including the sale of real estate, which will generally require more estimates and more judgment and more disclosures than under current guidance. Because this ASU specifically excludes lease contracts from its scope, its application is not expected to impact our recognition of rental income on a straight-line basis. In August 2015 the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
ASU 2014-09 is now effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company plans on adopting this standard using the full retrospective adoption method on January 1, 2018. The Company’s revenue-producing contracts are primarily leases that are not within the scope of this standard. As a result, the Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on the Company’s rental income. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact on other revenue sources.
In February 2015 the FASB issued ASU 2015-02,
Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
, which is generally effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. ASU 2015-02 changed the consolidation analysis for all reporting entities. The changes primarily affect the consolidation of limited partnerships and their equivalents (e.g., limited liability corporations), the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, as well as structured vehicles such as collateralized debt obligations. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-02 in the first quarter of 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015 the FASB issued ASU 2015-03,
Interest-Imputation of Interest
, whose primary effect as subsequently modified is to mandate that, except for revolving credit facilities (which may carry a zero balance), debt issuance costs be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the face amount of the related liability. Debt issuance costs have previously been presented among assets on the balance sheet. The standard does not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In adopting ASU 2015-03 in the first quarter of 2016, we have chosen to deduct debt issuance costs from amounts owing under our line of credit arrangements, and we have restated prior periods for the effect of these reclassifications. The adoption had the effect of reducing total assets and total liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2015, by the amount of unamortized loan costs of
$11,814,000
.
In September 2015 the FASB issued ASU 2015-16
Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments,
whose principal provisions require that in a business combination an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments in ASU 2015-16 require that the acquirer record, in the same period's financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Previously, GAAP required that during the measurement period, the acquirer retrospectively adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, the amendments in ASU 2015-16 eliminate the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. For public business entities, the amendments in ASU 2015-16 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-16 in the first quarter of 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-16 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.
Public companies will be required to apply 2016-01 for all accounting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. For public companies, the primary effects of 2016-01 are to:
|
•
|
Require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer.
|
|
•
|
Simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value.
|
79
|
•
|
Eliminate the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet.
|
|
•
|
Require the use of the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes.
|
|
•
|
Require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments.
|
|
•
|
Require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
|
|
•
|
Clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets.
|
Because we have recently disposed of our only equity-method investment, because as a REIT we are generally exempt from federal taxation under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and because other provisions of the ASU 2016-01 primarily concern matters of disclosure, only, we expect the most significant effect on NHI of adopting ASU 2016-01 to be the mandate that marketable equity investments be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The effect of our eventual adoption of ASU 2016-01 in 2018 will be dependent on levels of investment in other publicly traded REITs that NHI continues to have at that time. Currently we hold investments in equity securities of
$11,745,000
with unrealized fair value subject to reclassification from other comprehensive income of
$10,065,000
.
In February 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases.
Public companies will be required to apply ASU 2016-02 for all accounting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 - for REITs this means application will be required beginning January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. All leases with lease terms greater than one year are subject to ASU 2016-02 , including leases in place as of the adoption date. Management expects that, because of the ASU 2016-02’s emphasis on lessee accounting, ASU 2016-02 will not have a material impact on our accounting for leases. Consistent with present standards, NHI will continue to account for lease revenue on a straight-line basis for most leases. Also consistent with NHI’s current practice, under ASU 2016-02 only initial direct costs that are incremental to the lessor will be capitalized.
In March 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
, as part of its simplification initiative. ASU 2016-09
is effective for public companies starting in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.
The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including related income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification of equity awards within the statement of cash flows. Because NHI is designed as a pass-through entity for purposes of Federal taxation, many of the provisions of ASU 2016-09 which deal with taxation will not have a material effect on our financial statements. Among the provisions with broader reach are simplifications as to treatment of forfeitures, which under current GAAP are based on the number of awards that are expected to vest. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-09, an entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest, as in current GAAP, or account for forfeitures when they occur. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 clarifies that cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity. Our adoption of the provisions of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2016 had no material effect on our consolidated financial statements
.
In March 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-06,
Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments
, which clarifies how to assess whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. This assessment is necessary to determine if the options must be separately accounted for as derivatives. The ASU clarifies that an entity is required to assess the embedded options solely in accordance with a specific four-step decision sequence and is not also required to assess whether the contingency for exercising the options is indexed to interest rates or credit risk. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-06 in the first quarter of 2016. The adoption of ASU 2016-06 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
. ASU 2016-13 will require more timely recognition of credit losses associated with financial assets. While
current
GAAP includes multiple credit impairment objectives for instruments, the previous objectives generally delayed recognition of the full amount of credit losses until the loss was probable of occurring. The amendments in ASU 2016-13, whose scope is asset-based and not restricted to financial institutions, are an
80
improvement to existing standards in eliminating the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, reflect an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. Previously, when credit losses were measured under GAAP we generally only considered past events and current conditions in measuring the incurred loss. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 broaden the information that we must consider in developing our expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The use of forecasted information incorporates more timely information in the estimate of expected credit loss that will be more useful to users of the financial statements. ASU 2016-13 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Because we are likely to continue to invest in loans, adoption of ASU 2016-13 in 2020 will have some effect on our accounting for these investments, though the nature of those effects will depend on the composition of our loan portfolio at that time; accordingly, we are evaluating the extent of the effects, if any, that adopting the provisions of ASU 2016-13 in 2020 will have on NHI.
In January 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Clarifying the Definition of a Business
. ASU 2017-01 will narrow the definition of a business in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the current implementation guidance in Topic 805, there are three elements of a business-inputs, processes, and outputs. Currently the definition of outputs contributes to broad interpretations of the definition of a business. Additionally, the Standard provides that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. For purposes of this test, land and buildings can be combined along with the intangible assets for any in-place leases. For most of NHI’s acquisitions of investment property, this screen would be met and, therefore, not meet the definition of a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods. Early application of this standard is generally allowed for acquisitions acquired after the standard was issued but before the acquisition has been reflected in financial statements. We will adopt the provisions of ASU 2017-01 in the first quarter of 2017 and anticipate no material effect on our consolidated financial statements from its adoption.
In January 2017, we finalized and began funding a new loan commitment to Bickford. Initial funding on January 17, 2017, was
$1,800,000
toward a maximum of
$14,000,000
for the project. The agreement conveys a mortgage interest and will facilitate construction of an assisted living facility in Shelby, Michigan. The construction loan bears interest at
9%
and conveys a purchase option to NHI, exercisable upon stabilization, as defined. Upon exercise of the purchase option, rent will be reset based on NHI's total investment, with a floor of
9.55%
.
None.
Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures.
As of
December 31, 2016
, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of management’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) to ensure information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and our CAO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving desired control objectives, and management is necessarily required to apply its judgment when evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of potential controls and procedures. Based upon the evaluation, the CEO and CAO concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
December 31, 2016
.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation during the three months ended
December 31, 2016
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
81
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of National Health Investors, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016
using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013)
. Based on that assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2016
. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, BDO USA, LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting included herein.
82
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
National Health Investors, Inc.
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
We have audited National Health Investors, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016
, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). National Health Investors, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Item 9A, Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, National Health Investors, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016
, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Health Investors, Inc. as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2016
and our report dated
February 16, 2017
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Nashville, Tennessee
February 16, 2017
83
None.
84
We have filed with the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) the Annual CEO Certification regarding the Company’s compliance with the NYSE’s Corporate Governance listing standards as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Additionally, we have filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, the applicable certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer as required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the
2017
annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the
2017
annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the
2017
annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the
2017
annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
Incorporated by reference from the information in our definitive proxy statement for the
2017
annual meeting of stockholders, which we will file within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Item 8 and are filed as part of this report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The Financial Statement Schedules and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedules are listed in Exhibit 99.1.
(3) Exhibits
Exhibits required as part of this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.
85
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
|
|
|
BY:
/s/ D. Eric Mendelsohn
|
|
|
D. Eric Mendelsohn
|
|
|
Date: February 16, 2017
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
/s/ D. Eric Mendelsohn
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
|
D. Eric Mendelsohn
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
|
/s/ Roger R. Hopkins
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
|
Roger R. Hopkins
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
||
|
/s/ W. Andrew Adams
|
Chairman of the Board
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
|
W. Andrew Adams
|
|||
|
/s/ James R. Jobe
|
Director
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
|
James R. Jobe
|
|||
|
/s/ Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
Director
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
|
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
|||
|
/s/ Robert T. Webb
|
Director
|
February 16, 2017
|
|
|
Robert T. Webb
|
|||
86
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Page No. or Location
|
|
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Form S-11 Registration Statement No.
33-41863
|
|
3.2
|
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated as of May 1,
2009
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed March 23, 2009
|
|
3.3
|
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation approved by shareholders on May 2, 2014
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to
Form 10-Q dated August 4, 2014
|
|
3.4
|
Restated Bylaws as amended November 5, 2012
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to
Form 10-K filed February 15, 2013
|
|
3.5
|
Amendment No. 1 to Restated Bylaws dated February 14,
2014
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to
Form 10-K filed February 14, 2014
|
|
4.1
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 39 to
Form S-11 Registration Statement No.
33-41863
|
|
4.2
|
Indenture, dated as of March 25, 2014, between National
Health Investors, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 8-K dated March 31, 2014
|
|
4.3
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 25, 2014, to the Indenture, dated as of March 25, 2014, between National Health Investors, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Form 8-K dated March 31, 2014
|
|
10.1
|
Material Contracts
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 thru 10.9 to Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 33-41863
|
|
10.2
|
Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s Master Agreement to
Lease with NHC
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-K dated March 10, 2006
|
|
10.3
|
Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Master Agreement to
Lease with NHC
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q dated November 4, 2013
|
|
10.4
|
Amended and Restated Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s
Master Agreement to Lease with NHC.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-K filed February 14, 2014
|
|
*10.5
|
2005 Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed August 4, 2005
|
|
*10.6
|
2012 Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the
Company’s Proxy Statement filed March 23,
2012
|
|
*10.7
|
First Amendment to the 2005 Stock Option, Restricted Stock & Stock Appreciation Rights Plan
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed March
17, 2006
|
|
*10.8
|
Second Amendment to the 2005 Stock Option, Restricted
Stock & Stock Appreciation Rights Plan
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to the
Company’s Proxy Statement filed March 23,
2009
|
|
10.9
|
Excepted Holder Agreement - W. Andrew Adams
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
Form 10-K dated February 24, 2009
|
|
10.10
|
Excepted Holder Agreement between the Company and Andrea Adams Brown with Schedule A identifying substantially identical agreements and setting forth the material details in which such agreements differ from this agreement.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q dated November 3, 2010
|
|
10.11
|
Agreement with Care Foundation of America, Inc.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
Form 10-K dated February 22, 2010
|
87
|
10.12
|
Contract to Acquire Properties dated October 31, 2011 by and between National Health Investors, Inc. and Firehole River Real Estate Holdings - Greenville, Ltd., Firehole River Real Estate Holdings - West Houston, Ltd., Legend Oaks - Ennis, LLC, Legend Greenville Healthcare, LLC, Legend Oaks - West Houston, LLC and Legend Oaks - North Houston, LLC
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q dated November 7, 2011
|
|
10.13
|
Extension of Master Agreement to Lease dated December 28,
2012.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Form 10-K dated February 15, 2013
|
|
10.14
|
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated as of June 24,
3013 among Care Investment Trust Inc., Care YBE Subsidiary
LLC and NHI-Bickford RE, LLC
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q dated August 5, 2013
|
|
10.15
|
Master Lease dated as of December 23, 2013 between NHI- REIT of Next House, LLC, Myrtle Beach Retirement Residence LLC and Voorhees Retirement Residence LLC, individually and collectively as Landlord, and NH Master Tenant LLC, as Tenant.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 8-K dated December 23, 2013
|
|
10.16
|
Guarantee of Lease Agreement dated as of December 23, 2013 between NHI-REIT of Next House, LLC, Myrtle Beach Retirement Residence LLC and Voorhees Retirement Residence LLC, individually and collectively as Landlord, and Holiday AL Holdings, LP as Guarantor.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Form 8-K dated December 23, 2013
|
|
10.17
|
Purchase Agreement dated as of November 18, 2013 between the Registrant and certain subsidiaries of Holiday Acquisition Holdings LLC.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to
Form 10-K filed February 14, 2014
|
|
10.18
|
Amendment No. 7 to Master Agreement to Lease with NHC
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to
Form 10-K filed February 14, 2014
|
|
10.19
|
Third Amended And Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 27, 2014, by and among National Health Investors, Inc., each Lender From time to time party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, a national banking association, as Administrative Agent, the Swing Line Lender and the Issuing Bank.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed March 31, 2014
|
|
*10.20
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of February 14, 2014 by and between National Health Investors, Inc. and Justin Hutchens.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q dated May 5, 2014
|
|
10.21
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 1, 2014 with Senior Living Communities, LLC and certain of its affiliates, relating to the acquisition of a portfolio of eight retirement communities.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to
Form 10-K filed February 17, 2015
|
|
10.22
|
$225 million Note Purchase Agreement dated January 13, 2015 with Prudential Capital Group and certain of its affiliates.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to
Form 10-K filed February 17, 2015
|
|
*10.23
|
First amendment to 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to
Proxy Statement filed March 20, 2015.
|
|
10.24
|
Master Credit Agreement dated February 10, 2015 between the
Company and LCS-Westminster Partnership
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q dated May 7, 2015
|
|
10.25
|
Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement for Urbandale Bickford Cottage by and between Care YBE Subsidiary LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and KeyBank National Association, a national banking association with Appendix 1 identifying substantially identical agreements and setting forth the material details in which such agreements differ from this agreement.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Form 10-Q dated May 7, 2015
|
|
10.26
|
Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement for Omaha II Bickford Cottage by and between Care YBE Subsidiary LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and KeyBank National Association, a national banking association
with Appendix 1 identifying substantially identical agreements and setting forth the material details in which
such agreements differ from this agreement
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-Q dated May 7, 2015
|
88
|
10.27
|
First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Incremental Facility Agreement dated as of January 13, 2015 by and among National Health Investors, Inc., the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
|
Filed herewith
|
|
10.28
|
Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Incremental Facility Agreement dated as of March 20, 2015 by and among National Health Investors, Inc., the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
|
Filed herewith
|
|
10.29
|
Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Incremental Facility Agreement dated as of June 30, 2015 by and among National Health Investors, Inc., the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q dated August 5, 2015
|
|
10.30
|
Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 30,
2015 among the Corporation, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and the other Purchasers named therein
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q dated August 5, 2015
|
|
*10.31
|
Employment Agreement dated as of October 5, 2015 by and between National Health Investors, Inc. and D. Eric Mendelsohn
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q dated November 4, 2015
|
|
10.32
|
$50,000,000 of 8-year notes with a coupon of 3.99% and
$50,000,000 of 10-year notes with a coupon of 4.33% to a
private placement lender.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to Form 10-K filed February 18, 2016
|
|
10.33
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2016, between Texas NHI Investors, LLC and Gladewater Real Estate, LP, Firehole River Real Estate Holdings - Granite Mesa, Ltd, Firehole River Real Estate Holdings - Sonterra, Ltd, Firehole River Real Estate Holdings - West San Antonio, Ltd, RGV Real Estate Holdings, Ltd, Firehole River Real Estate Holdings - Euless, LP, and Firehole River Real Estate Holdings - Katy, LLC, and Legend Healthcare, LLC
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed May 6, 2016
|
|
10.34
|
NHI PropCo, LLC Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed November 7, 2016
|
|
10.35
|
$75,000,000 of 8-year notes with a coupon of 3.93% issued to a private placement lender
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed November 7, 2016
|
|
10.36
|
Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Incremental Facility Agreement dated as of November 3, 2015 by and among National Health Investors, Inc., the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
|
Filed herewith
|
|
10.37
|
Fifth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Incremental Facility Agreement dated as of August 12, 2016 by and among National Health Investors, Inc., the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
|
Filed herewith
|
|
12.1
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
|
Filed herewith
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
|
Filed herewith
|
|
23.1
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
Filed herewith
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed Herewith
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed Herewith
|
|
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
Filed Herewith
|
89
|
99.1
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
Filed herewith
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
90
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. Properties Owned Or Associated with Mortgage Loan Investments As Of December 31, 2016Item 2. Properties Owned Or Associated with Mortgage Loan Investments As OfItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataNote 1. Significant Accounting PoliciesNote 2. Real EstateNote 3. Equity-method Investment and Other AssetsNote 4. Mortgage and Other Notes ReceivableNote 5. Investments in Marketable SecuritiesNote 6. DebtNote 7. Commitments and ContingenciesNote 8. Investment and Other GainsNote 9. Share-based CompensationNote 10. Earnings and Dividends Per Common ShareNote 11. Income TaxesNote 12. Fair Value Of Financial InstrumentsNote 13. Limits on Common Stock OwnershipNote 14. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)Note 14. Selected Quarterly Financial DataNote 15. Recent Accounting PronouncementsNote 16. Subsequent EventItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules