NIKE, INC.
10-Qs and 10-Ks
PROXIES
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
|
FORM 10-Q
|
(Mark One)
☑
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended
February 28, 2017
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-10635
|
NIKE, Inc.
|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
OREGON
|
|
93-0584541
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
One Bowerman Drive,
Beaverton, Oregon
|
|
97005-6453
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (503) 671-6453
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
☑
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
☑
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer
|
☑
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
☐
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller Reporting Company
|
☐
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
☐
No
☑
Shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
March 31, 2017
were:
|
Class A
|
329,245,752
|
|
|
Class B
|
1,321,520,800
|
|
|
1,650,766,552
|
|
|
NIKE, INC.
FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents
|
Page
|
||
|
ITEM 1.
|
||
|
ITEM 2.
|
||
|
ITEM 3.
|
||
|
ITEM 4.
|
||
|
ITEM 1.
|
||
|
ITEM 1A.
|
||
|
ITEM 2.
|
||
|
ITEM 6.
|
||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
|
NIKE, Inc. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
February 28,
|
May 31,
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||
|
ASSETS
|
|
|||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|
|||||||
|
Cash and equivalents
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
$
|
3,138
|
|
||
|
Short-term investments
|
2,139
|
|
2,319
|
|
||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
3,752
|
|
3,241
|
|
||||
|
Inventories
|
4,932
|
|
4,838
|
|
||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
1,361
|
|
1,489
|
|
||||
|
Total current assets
|
16,205
|
|
15,025
|
|
||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
3,793
|
|
3,520
|
|
||||
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net
|
283
|
|
281
|
|
||||
|
Goodwill
|
139
|
|
131
|
|
||||
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
2,732
|
|
2,422
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$
|
23,152
|
|
$
|
21,379
|
|
||
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|||||||
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
||
|
Notes payable
|
23
|
|
1
|
|
||||
|
Accounts payable
|
1,938
|
|
2,191
|
|
||||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
3,228
|
|
3,037
|
|
||||
|
Income taxes payable
|
76
|
|
85
|
|
||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
5,271
|
|
5,358
|
|
||||
|
Long-term debt
|
3,472
|
|
1,993
|
|
||||
|
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities
|
1,687
|
|
1,770
|
|
||||
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
|
Common stock at stated value:
|
||||||||
|
Class A convertible — 329 and 353 shares outstanding
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Class B — 1,323 and 1,329 shares outstanding
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
||||
|
Capital in excess of stated value
|
8,395
|
|
7,786
|
|
||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
229
|
|
318
|
|
||||
|
Retained earnings
|
4,095
|
|
4,151
|
|
||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
12,722
|
|
12,258
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
23,152
|
|
$
|
21,379
|
|
||
The accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
3
|
NIKE, Inc. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
8,432
|
|
$
|
8,032
|
|
$
|
25,673
|
|
$
|
24,132
|
|
||||
|
Cost of sales
|
4,682
|
|
4,343
|
|
14,184
|
|
12,947
|
|
||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
3,750
|
|
3,689
|
|
11,489
|
|
11,185
|
|
||||||||
|
Demand creation expense
|
749
|
|
804
|
|
2,552
|
|
2,405
|
|
||||||||
|
Operating overhead expense
|
1,747
|
|
1,762
|
|
5,346
|
|
5,298
|
|
||||||||
|
Total selling and administrative expense
|
2,496
|
|
2,566
|
|
7,898
|
|
7,703
|
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
19
|
|
5
|
|
41
|
|
14
|
|
||||||||
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
(88
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
(168
|
)
|
(82
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
1,323
|
|
1,135
|
|
3,718
|
|
3,550
|
|
||||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
182
|
|
185
|
|
486
|
|
636
|
|
||||||||
|
NET INCOME
|
$
|
1,141
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
$
|
2,914
|
|
||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
||||
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
||||
The accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
4
|
NIKE, Inc. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
||||
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
1,141
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
$
|
2,914
|
|
||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Change in net foreign currency translation adjustment
|
12
|
|
(111
|
)
|
1
|
|
(221
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Change in net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
|
(175
|
)
|
(350
|
)
|
(92
|
)
|
(389
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Change in net gains (losses) on other
|
(7
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
2
|
|
9
|
|
||||||||
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
(170
|
)
|
(462
|
)
|
(89
|
)
|
(601
|
)
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
$
|
971
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
$
|
3,143
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
||||
The accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
5
|
NIKE, Inc. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
|
(In millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||
|
Cash provided by operations:
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
$
|
2,914
|
|
||
|
Income charges (credits) not affecting cash:
|
|
|||||||
|
Depreciation
|
521
|
|
481
|
|
||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(199
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
162
|
|
176
|
|
||||
|
Amortization and other
|
7
|
|
18
|
|
||||
|
Net foreign currency adjustments
|
(90
|
)
|
192
|
|
||||
|
Changes in certain working capital components and other assets and liabilities:
|
|
|||||||
|
(Increase) in accounts receivable
|
(546
|
)
|
(124
|
)
|
||||
|
(Increase) in inventories
|
(157
|
)
|
(359
|
)
|
||||
|
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(152
|
)
|
(149
|
)
|
||||
|
(Decrease) in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and income taxes payable
|
(27
|
)
|
(1,231
|
)
|
||||
|
Cash provided by operations
|
2,751
|
|
1,912
|
|
||||
|
Cash used by investing activities:
|
|
|||||||
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
(4,029
|
)
|
(3,759
|
)
|
||||
|
Maturities of short-term investments
|
2,433
|
|
2,021
|
|
||||
|
Sales of short-term investments
|
1,905
|
|
1,939
|
|
||||
|
Investments in reverse repurchase agreements
|
—
|
|
150
|
|
||||
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
(776
|
)
|
(901
|
)
|
||||
|
Disposals of property, plant and equipment
|
13
|
|
9
|
|
||||
|
Other investing activities
|
(34
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
|
Cash used by investing activities
|
(488
|
)
|
(544
|
)
|
||||
|
Cash used by financing activities:
|
|
|||||||
|
Net proceeds from long-term debt issuance
|
1,482
|
|
981
|
|
||||
|
Long-term debt payments, including current portion
|
(43
|
)
|
(104
|
)
|
||||
|
Increase (decrease) in notes payable
|
24
|
|
(68
|
)
|
||||
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
(14
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other stock issuances
|
339
|
|
370
|
|
||||
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
|
125
|
|
231
|
|
||||
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
(2,429
|
)
|
(2,698
|
)
|
||||
|
Dividends — common and preferred
|
(834
|
)
|
(752
|
)
|
||||
|
Cash used by financing activities
|
(1,350
|
)
|
(2,045
|
)
|
||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents
|
(30
|
)
|
(131
|
)
|
||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents
|
883
|
|
(808
|
)
|
||||
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period
|
3,138
|
|
3,852
|
|
||||
|
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
$
|
3,044
|
|
||
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|||||||
|
Non-cash additions to property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
248
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
||
|
Dividends declared and not paid
|
303
|
|
270
|
|
||||
The accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
6
|
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Note 1
|
||
|
Note 2
|
||
|
Note 3
|
||
|
Note 4
|
||
|
Note 5
|
||
|
Note 6
|
||
|
Note 7
|
||
|
Note 8
|
||
|
Note 9
|
||
|
Note 10
|
||
|
Note 11
|
||
|
Note 12
|
||
7
|
Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
B
asis of Presentation
The Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of NIKE, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) and reflect all normal adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim period. The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of
May 31, 2016
was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The interim financial information and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
fiscal 2017
presentation.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In April 2015, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-03,
Interest — Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.
The updated guidance requires debt issuance costs to be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the corresponding debt liability on the balance sheet. The Company adopted the standard on a retrospective basis in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of this standard reduced both
Deferred income taxes and other assets
and
Long-term debt
by
$17 million
on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
May 31, 2016
.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16,
Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
. The updated guidance requires companies to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Income tax effects of intra-entity transfers of inventory will continue to be deferred until the inventory has been sold to a third party. The ASU is effective for the Company beginning June 1, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect recognized through retained earnings at the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which interim or annual financial statements have not been issued. The Company is evaluating the impact this update will have on its existing accounting policies and the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company anticipates the updated guidance could have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements at adoption through the recognition of a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of previously deferred charges.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,
Compensation
—
Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
, which changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees. The updated guidance requires excess tax benefits and deficiencies from share-based payment awards to be recorded in income tax expense in the income statement. Currently, excess tax benefits and deficiencies are recognized in shareholders’ equity on the balance sheet. This change is required to be applied prospectively. In addition, the updated guidance also changes the accounting for statutory tax withholding requirements, classification in the statement of cash flows and provides an option to continue to estimate forfeitures or account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company will adopt the standard on June 1, 2017 and will elect to continue to estimate forfeitures. The Company continues to evaluate the impact this update will have on its existing accounting policies and the Consolidated Financial Statements. The ASU is expected to result in increased volatility to the Company’s income tax expense in future periods dependent upon, among other variables, the price of its common stock and the timing and volume of share-based payment award activity, such as employee exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
, that replaces existing lease accounting guidance. The new standard is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The new guidance will require the Company to continue to classify leases as either operating or financing, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The Company will adopt the standard on June 1, 2019. The ASU is required to be applied using a modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the earliest period presented, with optional practical expedients. The Company is in the preliminary stages of the assessment of the effect the guidance will have on its existing accounting policies and the Consolidated Financial Statements, but expects there will be an increase in assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at adoption due to the recording of right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities, which may be material. Refer to Note 15
—
Commitments and Contingencies of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 for information about the Company’s lease obligations.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,
Financial Instruments
—
Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
. The updated guidance enhances the reporting model for financial instruments, which includes amendments to address aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. The update to the standard is effective for the Company beginning June 1, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
,
that replaces existing revenue recognition guidance. The updated guidance requires companies to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new standard requires that reporting companies disclose the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company will adopt the standard on June 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach with the cumulative effective of initially applying the new standard recognized in retained earnings at the date of initial application. The Company is in the process of evaluating the new standard against its existing accounting policies, including the timing of revenue recognition, and its contracts with customers, to determine the effect the guidance will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
Note 2 — Inventories
|
Inventory balances of
$4,932 million
and
$4,838 million
at
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
, respectively, were substantially all finished goods.
8
|
Note 3 — Accrued Liabilities
|
Accrued liabilities
included the following:
|
|
As of February 28,
|
As of May 31,
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||
|
Compensation and benefits, excluding taxes
|
$
|
831
|
|
$
|
943
|
|
||
|
Endorsement compensation
|
338
|
|
393
|
|
||||
|
Dividends payable
|
303
|
|
271
|
|
||||
|
Collateral received from counterparties to hedging instruments
|
293
|
|
105
|
|
||||
|
Import and logistics costs
|
257
|
|
198
|
|
||||
|
Taxes other than income taxes
|
189
|
|
159
|
|
||||
|
Advertising and marketing
|
137
|
|
119
|
|
||||
|
Fair value of derivatives
|
118
|
|
162
|
|
||||
|
Other
(1)
|
762
|
|
687
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL ACCRUED LIABILITIES
|
$
|
3,228
|
|
$
|
3,037
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Other consists of various accrued expenses with no individual item accounting for more than
5%
of the total Accrued liabilities balance at
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
.
|
|
Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements
|
The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including derivatives and available-for-sale securities. Fair value is the price the Company would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with a market participant at the measurement date. The Company uses the three-level hierarchy established by the FASB that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach).
The levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
|
•
|
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
|
|
•
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data available, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the most conservative level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Pricing vendors are utilized for certain Level 1 and Level 2 investments. These vendors either provide a quoted market price in an active market or use observable inputs without applying significant adjustments in their pricing. Observable inputs include broker quotes, interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities and credit risks. The fair value of derivative contracts is determined using observable market inputs such as the daily market foreign currency rates, forward pricing curves, currency volatilities, currency correlations and interest rates, and considers nonperformance risk of the Company and that of its counterparties.
The Company’s fair value processes include controls that are designed to ensure appropriate fair values are recorded. These controls include a comparison of fair values to another independent pricing vendor.
9
The following tables present information about the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
, and indicate the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the Company classifies the fair value measurement.
|
As of February 28, 2017
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Assets at Fair Value
|
Cash and Equivalents
|
Short-term Investments
|
Other Long-term Assets
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash
|
$
|
610
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Level 1:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
1,195
|
|
150
|
|
1,045
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Level 2:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Time deposits
|
839
|
|
812
|
|
27
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
U.S. Agency securities
|
633
|
|
260
|
|
373
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Commercial paper and bonds
|
854
|
|
160
|
|
694
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
2,029
|
|
2,029
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Level 2:
|
4,355
|
|
3,261
|
|
1,094
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Level 3:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Non-marketable preferred stock
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL
|
$
|
6,170
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
$
|
2,139
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
||||
|
As of May 31, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Assets at Fair Value
|
Cash and Equivalents
|
Short-term Investments
|
Other Long-term Assets
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Level 1:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
1,265
|
|
100
|
|
1,165
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Level 2:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Time deposits
|
831
|
|
827
|
|
4
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
U.S. Agency securities
|
679
|
|
—
|
|
679
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Commercial paper and bonds
|
733
|
|
262
|
|
471
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Money market funds
|
1,175
|
|
1,175
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Total Level 2:
|
3,418
|
|
2,264
|
|
1,154
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Level 3:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Non-marketable preferred stock
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10
|
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL
|
$
|
5,467
|
|
$
|
3,138
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
||||
The Company elects to record the gross assets and liabilities of its derivative financial instruments on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting arrangements that allow for the offset of assets and liabilities in the event of default or early termination of the contract. Any amounts of cash collateral received related to these instruments associated with the Company's credit-related contingent features are recorded in
Cash and equivalents
and
Accrued liabilities
, the latter of which would further offset against the Company’s derivative asset balance (refer to
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
). Any amounts of cash collateral posted related to these instruments associated with the Company's credit-related contingent features are recorded in
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
, which would further offset against the Company’s derivative liability balance (refer to
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
). Cash collateral received or posted related to the Company's credit-related contingent features is presented in the
Cash provided by operations
component of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Any amounts of non-cash collateral received, such as securities, are not recorded on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets pursuant to U.S. GAAP.
10
The following tables present information about the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
, and indicate the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the Company classifies the fair value measurement.
|
As of February 28, 2017
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivative Assets
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Assets at Fair Value
|
Other Current Assets
|
Other Long-term Assets
|
Liabilities at Fair Value
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
Other Long-term Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Level 2:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
(1)
|
$
|
607
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
||||||
|
Embedded derivatives
|
9
|
|
1
|
|
8
|
|
10
|
|
4
|
|
6
|
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL
|
$
|
616
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
If the foreign exchange derivative instruments had been netted on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, the asset and liability positions each would have been reduced by
$114 million
as of
February 28, 2017
. As of that date, the Company had received
$293 million
of cash collateral from various counterparties related to these foreign exchange derivative instruments.
No
amount of collateral was posted on the Company's derivative liability balance as of
February 28, 2017
.
|
|
As of May 31, 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivative Assets
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Assets at Fair Value
|
Other Current Assets
|
Other Long-term Assets
|
Liabilities at Fair Value
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
Other Long-term Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Level 2:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
(1)
|
$
|
603
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
||||||
|
Embedded derivatives
|
7
|
|
2
|
|
5
|
|
9
|
|
2
|
|
7
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
(2)
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
—
|
|
45
|
|
45
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL
|
$
|
617
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
If the foreign exchange derivative instruments had been netted on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, the asset and liability positions each would have been reduced by
$136 million
as of
May 31, 2016
. As of that date, the Company had received
$105 million
of cash collateral from various counterparties related to these foreign exchange derivative instruments.
No
amount of collateral was posted on the Company’s derivative liability balance as
of
May 31, 2016
.
|
|
(2)
|
As
of
May 31, 2016
,
no
amount
of cash collateral had been received or posted on the derivative asset or liability balance related to the Company's interest rate swaps.
|
Available-for-sale securities comprise investments in U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, time deposits, money market funds, corporate commercial paper and bonds. These securities are valued using market prices in both active markets (Level 1) and less active markets (Level 2). As of
February 28, 2017
, the Company held
$1,915 million
of available-for-sale securities with maturity dates within one year and
$224 million
with maturity dates over one year and less than five years within
Short-term investments
on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
. The gross realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities were immaterial for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
were immaterial as of
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
. The Company regularly reviews its available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary impairment. For the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, the Company did not consider any of its securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired and, accordingly, did not recognize any impairment losses.
Included in
Interest expense (income), net
for the
three months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
was interest income related to the Company's available-for-sale securities of
$8 million
and
$4 million
, respectively, and
$17 million
and
$8 million
for the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, respectively.
The Company’s Level 3 assets comprise investments in certain non-marketable preferred stock. These Level 3 investments are an immaterial portion of the Company's portfolio. Changes in Level 3 investment assets were immaterial during the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
.
No
transfers among levels within the fair value hierarchy occurred during the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
.
Derivative financial instruments include foreign exchange forwards and options, embedded derivatives and interest rate swaps. Refer to
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
for additional detail.
As of
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
, assets or liabilities that were required to be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were
immaterial
.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value
For fair value information regarding
Long-term debt
, refer to
Note 5 — Long-Term Debt
.
The carrying amounts reflected on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for
Notes payable
approximate fair value.
11
|
Note 5 — Long-Term Debt
|
Long-term debt
, net of unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, comprises the following
:
|
|
Original
Principal
|
Interest
Rate
|
Interest
Payments
|
Book Value Outstanding as of
|
|||||||||||||
|
Scheduled Maturity (Dollars and Yen in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
May 31, 2016
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Bond Payables:
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
May 1, 2023
(2)
|
$
|
500
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Semi-Annually
|
$
|
497
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|||||
|
November 1, 2026
(3)
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
Semi-Annually
|
993
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
May 1, 2043
(2)
|
$
|
500
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
Semi-Annually
|
495
|
|
494
|
|
|||||||
|
November 1, 2045
(4)
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
Semi-Annually
|
981
|
|
981
|
|
|||||||
|
November 1, 2046
(3)
|
$
|
500
|
|
3.38
|
%
|
Semi-Annually
|
490
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Promissory Notes:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
April 1, 2017
(5)
|
$
|
40
|
|
6.20
|
%
|
Monthly
|
—
|
|
38
|
|
|||||||
|
Japanese Yen Notes:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
August 20, 2001 through November 20, 2020
(6)
|
¥
|
9,000
|
|
2.60
|
%
|
Quarterly
|
15
|
|
18
|
|
|||||||
|
August 20, 2001 through November 20, 2020
(6)
|
¥
|
4,000
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
Quarterly
|
7
|
|
9
|
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
2,037
|
|
||||||||||
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
44
|
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,472
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
|
||||||||
|
(1)
|
These senior unsecured obligations rank equally with the Company's other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.
|
|
(2)
|
The bonds are redeemable at the Company's option prior to February 1, 2023 and November 1, 2042, respectively, at a price equal to the greater of (i)
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest. Subsequent to February 1, 2023 and November 1, 2042, respectively, the bonds also feature a par call provision, which allows for the bonds to be redeemed at a price equal to
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
(3)
|
The bonds are redeemable at the Company's option prior to August 1, 2026 and May 1, 2046, respectively, at a price equal to the greater of (i)
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest. Subsequent to August 1, 2026 and May 1, 2046, respectively, the bonds also feature a par call provision, which allows for the bonds to be redeemed at a price equal to
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
(4)
|
The bonds are redeemable at the Company's option prior to May 1, 2045, at a price equal to the greater of (i)
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest. Subsequent to May 1, 2045, the bonds also feature a par call provision, which allows for the bonds to be redeemed at a price equal to
100%
of the aggregate principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
(5)
|
During the three months ended
February 28, 2017
, the Company repaid the notes due April 1, 2017 pursuant to the terms of the debt agreement.
|
|
(6)
|
NIKE Logistics YK assumed a total of
¥13 billion
in loans as part of its agreement to purchase a distribution center in Japan, which serves as collateral for the loans. These loans mature in equal quarterly installments during the period August 20, 2001 through November 20, 2020.
|
The scheduled maturity of
Long-term debt
in each of th
e twelve month periods ending February 28, 2018 thro
ugh 2022 are
$6 million
,
$6 million
,
$6 million
,
$4 million
and
$0 million
, respectively, at face value.
The Company’s
Long-term debt
is recorded at adjusted cost, net of unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs. The fair value of
Long-term debt
is estimated based upon quoted prices for similar instruments or quoted prices for identical instruments in inactive markets (Level 2). The fair value of the Company’s
Long-term debt
, including the current portion, was approximately
$3,355 million
at
February 28, 2017
and
$2,125 million
at
May 31, 2016
.
|
Note 6 — Income Taxes
|
The effective tax rate was
13.1%
and
17.9%
for the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, respectively. The decrease in the Company's effective tax rate was primarily due to a discrete benefit related to the resolution of a foreign tax credit matter with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The Company also benefited from a reduction in tax reserves related to foreign operations.
As of
February 28, 2017
, total gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest and penalties, were
$421 million
,
$183 million
of which would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized in future periods. As of
May 31, 2016
, total gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest and penalties, were
$506 million
. The liability for payment of interest and penalties decreased $
36 million
during the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
. As of
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
, accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were
$173 million
and
$209 million
, respectively (excluding federal benefit).
The Company incurs tax liabilities primarily in the United States, China and the Netherlands, as well as various state and other foreign jurisdictions. The Company is currently under audit by the IRS for fiscal years 2013 through 2016. As previously disclosed, the Company received statutory notices of deficiency for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012 proposing a total increase in tax of
$254 million
,
subject to interest, related to a foreign tax credit matter. The Company contested these deficiencies by filing petitions with the U.S. Tax Court. During the three months ended August 31, 2016, the Company reached a resolution with the IRS on this matter. Decisions were subsequently filed in U.S. District Tax Court stating there is no deficiency in income tax due from the Company. The Company has now resolved all U.S. federal income tax matters through fiscal 2012.
12
T
he Company’s major foreign jurisdictions, China and the Netherlands, have concluded substantially all income tax matters through calendar 2006 and fiscal 2010, respectively. Although the timing of resolution of audits is not certain, the Company evaluates all domestic and foreign audit issues in the aggregate, along with the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations, and estimates that it is reasonably possible the total gross unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by up to
$168 million
within the next 12 months.
|
Note 7 — Common Stock and Stock-Based Compensation
|
The authorized number of shares of Class A Common Stock,
no
par value, and Class B Common Stock,
no
par value, are
400 million
and
2,400 million
, respectively.
Each share of Class A Common Stock is convertible into one share of Class B Common Stock.
Voting rights of Class B Common Stock are limited in certain circumstances with respect to the election of directors. There are no differences in the dividend and liquidation preferences or participation rights of the holders of Class A and Class B Common Stock.
The NIKE, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) provides for the issuance of up to
718 million
previously unissued shares of Class B Common Stock in connection with stock options and other awards granted under the Stock Incentive Plan. The Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the grant of non-statutory stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards. The exercise price for stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. A committee of the Board of Directors administers the Stock Incentive Plan. The committee has the authority to determine the employees to whom awards will be made, the amount of the awards and the other terms and conditions of the awards. Substantially all stock option grants outstanding under the Stock Incentive Plan are granted in the first quarter of each fiscal year, vest ratably over
four
years and expire
ten
years from the date of grant.
In addition to the Stock Incentive Plan, the Company gives employees the right to purchase shares at a discount to the market price under employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs). Subject to the annual statutory limit, employees are eligible to participate through payroll deductions of up to
10%
of their compensation. At the end of each
six
month offering period, shares are purchased by the participants at
85%
of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning or the end of the offering period.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation by estimating the fair value of options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan and employees’ purchase rights under the ESPPs using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company recognizes this fair value as
Operating overhead expense
over the vesting period using the straight-line method.
The following table summarizes the Company’s total stock-based compensation expense recognized in
Operating overhead expense
:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
Stock options
(1)
|
$
|
35
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
||||
|
ESPPs
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
27
|
|
22
|
|
||||||||
|
Restricted stock
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
25
|
|
26
|
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
|
$
|
51
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Expense for stock options includes the expense associated with stock appreciation rights. Accelerated stock option expense is recorded for employees eligible for accelerated stock option vesting upon retirement. Accelerated stock option expense was
$3 million
and
$8 million
for the
three months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, respectively, and
$11 million
and
$22 million
for the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, respectively.
|
As of
February 28, 2017
, the Company had
$236 million
of unrecognized compensation costs from stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, to be recognized in
Operating overhead expense
over a weighted average remaining period of
2.2
years.
The weighted average fair value per share of the options granted during the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, computed as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model, was
$9.38
and
$12.67
, respectively. The weighted average assumptions used to estimate these fair values were as follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||
|
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||
|
Dividend yield
|
1.1
|
%
|
1.0
|
%
|
||
|
Expected volatility
|
17.4
|
%
|
23.6
|
%
|
||
|
Weighted average expected life (in years)
|
6.0
|
|
5.8
|
|
||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.3
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
||
The Company estimates the expected volatility based on the implied volatility in market traded options on the Company’s common stock with a term greater than
one
year, along with other factors. The weighted average expected life of options is based on an analysis of historical and expected future exercise patterns. The interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury (constant maturity) risk-free rate in effect at the date of grant for periods corresponding with the expected term of the options.
13
|
Note 8 — Earnings Per Share
|
The following is a reconciliation from basic earnings per common share to diluted earnings per common share. The computations of diluted earnings per common share excluded options, including shares under employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), to purchase an additional
31.1 million
and
20.1 million
shares of common stock outstanding for the
three months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, respectively, and
31.0 million
and
1.1 million
shares of common stock outstanding for the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, respectively, because the options were anti-dilutive.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
Determination of shares:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
1,653.1
|
|
1,693.8
|
|
1,661.5
|
|
1,703.2
|
|
||||||||
|
Assumed conversion of dilutive stock options and awards
|
33.2
|
|
43.5
|
|
34.9
|
|
45.3
|
|
||||||||
|
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
1,686.3
|
|
1,737.3
|
|
1,696.4
|
|
1,748.5
|
|
||||||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
||||
|
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
|
The Company is exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, and uses derivatives to manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
The Company may elect to designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments under U.S. GAAP. The Company formally documents all relationships between designated hedging instruments and hedged items as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as hedges to either recognized assets or liabilities or forecasted transactions.
The majority of derivatives outstanding as of
February 28, 2017
are designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, primarily for Euro/U.S. Dollar, Japanese Yen/U.S. Dollar and British Pound/Euro currency pairs. All derivatives are recognized on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and classified based on the instrument’s maturity date.
14
The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included within the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
February 28, 2017
and
May 31, 2016
:
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Balance Sheet
Location
|
February 28,
2017 |
May 31,
2016 |
Balance Sheet
Location
|
February 28,
2017 |
May 31,
2016 |
||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives formally designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
$
|
366
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
$
|
35
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
—
|
|
7
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
—
|
|
45
|
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
100
|
|
90
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities
|
2
|
|
12
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total derivatives formally designated as hedging instruments
|
|
466
|
|
544
|
|
|
37
|
|
95
|
|
||||||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
127
|
|
40
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
79
|
|
76
|
|
||||||||||
|
Embedded derivatives
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
4
|
|
2
|
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
14
|
|
26
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities
|
—
|
|
19
|
|
||||||||||
|
Embedded derivatives
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
8
|
|
5
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities
|
6
|
|
7
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
150
|
|
73
|
|
|
89
|
|
104
|
|
||||||||||
|
TOTAL DERIVATIVES
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
||||||
The following tables present the amounts affecting the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
:
|
(In millions)
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives
(1)
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
(1)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
|
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
(5
|
)
|
(142
|
)
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
87
|
|
153
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
(3
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
Total selling and administrative expense
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
4
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
67
|
|
73
|
|
||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
—
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Total designated cash flow hedges
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
For the
three months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, the amounts recorded in
Other (income) expense, net
as a result of hedge ineffectiveness and the discontinuance of cash flow hedges because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring were immaterial.
|
15
|
(In millions) |
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives
(1)
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
(1)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
$
|
45
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
Revenues
|
$
|
96
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
244
|
|
63
|
|
Cost of sales
|
260
|
|
451
|
|
||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
Total selling and administrative expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
149
|
|
31
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
141
|
|
173
|
|
||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
(54
|
)
|
(99
|
)
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Total designated cash flow hedges
|
$
|
383
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
For the
nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, the amounts recorded in
Other (income) expense, net
as a result of hedge ineffectiveness and the discontinuance of cash flow hedges because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring were immaterial.
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on Derivatives
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||||
|
Derivatives designated as fair value hedges:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
(66
|
)
|
(30
|
)
|
101
|
|
4
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|||||||||
|
Embedded derivatives
|
(1
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|||||||||
|
(1)
|
All interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges meet the shortcut method requirements under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, changes in the fair values of the interest rate swaps are considered to exactly offset changes in the fair value of the underlying long-term debt. Refer to “Fair Value Hedges” in this note for additional detail.
|
Refer to
Note 3 — Accrued Liabilities
for derivative instruments recorded in
Accrued liabilities
,
Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements
for a description of how the above financial instruments are valued and
Note 10 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
for additional information on changes in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
.
Cash Flow Hedges
The purpose of the Company's foreign exchange risk management program is to lessen both the positive and negative effects of currency fluctuations on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Foreign currency exposures that the Company may elect to hedge in this manner include product cost exposures, non-functional currency denominated external and intercompany revenues, selling and administrative expenses, investments in U.S. Dollar-denominated available-for-sale debt securities and certain other intercompany transactions.
Product cost exposures are primarily generated through non-functional currency denominated product purchases and the foreign currency adjustment program described below. NIKE entities primarily purchase product in two ways: (1) Certain NIKE entities purchase product from the NIKE Trading Company (NTC), a wholly-owned sourcing hub that buys NIKE branded product from third-party factories, predominantly in U.S. Dollars. The NTC, whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar, then sells the product to NIKE entities in their respective functional currencies. When the NTC sells to a NIKE entity with a different functional currency, the result is a foreign currency exposure for the NTC. (2) Other NIKE entities purchase product directly from third-party factories in U.S. Dollars. These purchases generate a foreign currency exposure for those NIKE entities with a functional currency other than the U.S. Dollar.
The Company operates a foreign currency adjustment program with certain factories. The program is designed to more effectively manage foreign currency risk by assuming certain of the factories’ foreign currency exposures, some of which are natural offsets to the Company's existing foreign currency exposures. Under this program, the Company’s payments to these factories are adjusted for rate fluctuations in the basket of currencies (“factory currency exposure index”) in which the labor, materials and overhead costs incurred by the factories in the production of NIKE branded products (“factory input costs”) are denominated. For the portion of the indices denominated in the local or functional currency of the factory, the Company may elect to enter into derivative contracts formally designated as cash flow hedges. For all currencies within the indices, excluding the U.S. Dollar and the local or functional currency of the factory, an embedded derivative contract is created upon the factory’s acceptance of NIKE’s purchase order. Embedded derivative contracts are separated from the related purchase order, as further described within the Embedded Derivatives section below.
The Company’s policy permits the utilization of derivatives to reduce its foreign currency exposures where internal netting or other strategies cannot be effectively employed. Typically, the Company may enter into hedge contracts starting up to
12
to
24
months in advance of the forecasted transaction and may place incremental hedges up to
100%
of the exposure by the time the forecasted transaction occurs. The total notional amount of outstanding foreign currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges was
$10.5 billion
as of
February 28, 2017
.
16
During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company terminated all forward-starting interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of
$1.5 billion
in connection with the October 21, 2016 debt issuance (refer to
Note 5 — Long-Term Debt
). Upon termination of these forward-starting swaps, the Company made cash payments to the related counterparties of
$92 million
, which was recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
and will be released through
Interest expense (income), net
as interest expense is incurred over the term of the issued debt.
All changes in fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, excluding any ineffective portion, are recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
until
Net income
is affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction. In most cases, amounts recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
will be released to
Net income
in periods following the maturity of the related derivative, rather than at maturity. Effective hedge results are classified within the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in the same manner as the underlying exposure. The results of hedges of non-functional currency denominated revenues and product cost exposures, excluding embedded derivatives, are recorded in
Revenues
or
Cost of sales
when the
underlying hedged transaction affects consolidated
Net income.
Results of hedges of selling and administrative expense are recorded together with those costs when the related expense is recorded. Amounts recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
related to forward-starting interest rate swaps will be released through
Interest expense (income), net
as interest expense is incurred over the term of the issued debt. Results of hedges of anticipated purchases of U.S. Dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities are recorded in
Other (income) expense, net
when the securities are sold. Results of hedges of certain anticipated intercompany transactions are recorded in
Other (income) expense, net
when the transaction occurs. The Company classifies the cash flows at settlement from these designated cash flow hedge derivatives in the same category as the cash flows from the related hedged items, primarily within the
Cash provided by operations
component of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Premiums paid or received on options are initially recorded as deferred charges or deferred credits, respectively. The Company assesses the effectiveness of options based on the total cash flows method and records total changes in the options’ fair value to
Accumulated other comprehensive income
to the degree they are effective.
The Company formally assesses, both at a hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in the hedging transaction have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. Effectiveness for cash flow hedges is assessed based on changes in forward rates. Ineffectiveness was
immaterial
for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
.
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (1) it determines that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item (including hedged items such as firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (3) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; or (4) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.
When the Company discontinues hedge accounting because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period, but is expected to occur within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
and is reclassified to
Net income
when the forecasted transaction affects consolidated
Net income
. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gains and losses that were in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
will be recognized immediately in
Other (income) expense, net
. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, the Company will carry the derivative at its fair value on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, recognizing future changes in the fair value in
Other (income) expense, net
. For the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
, the amounts recorded in
Other (income) expense, net
as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedging because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring were
immaterial
.
As of
February 28, 2017
,
$312 million
of deferred net gains (net of tax) on both outstanding and matured derivatives in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
were expected to be reclassified to
Net income
during the next 12 months concurrent with the underlying hedged transactions also being recorded in
Net income
. Actual amounts ultimately reclassified to
Net income
are dependent on the exchange rates in effect when derivative contracts that are currently outstanding mature. As of
February 28, 2017
, the maximum term over which the Company was hedging exposures to the variability of cash flows for its forecasted transactions was
27
months.
Fair Value Hedges
The Company has, in the past, been exposed to the risk of changes in the fair value of certain fixed-rate debt attributable to changes in interest rates. Derivatives used by the Company to hedge this risk are receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps. All interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges of the related long-term debt meet the shortcut method requirements under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, changes in the fair values of the interest rate swaps are considered to exactly offset changes in the fair value of the underlying long-term debt. The cash flows associated with the Company’s fair value hedges are periodic interest payments while the swaps are outstanding, which are reflected within the
Cash provided by operations
component of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company recorded
no
ineffectiveness from its interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
or
February 29, 2016
. On October 15, 2015, the Company repaid the long-term debt which had previously been hedged with these interest rate swaps. Accordingly, as of
February 28, 2017
, the Company had
no
interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges.
Net Investment Hedges
The Company has, in the past, hedged and may, in the future, hedge the risk of variability in foreign-currency-denominated net investments in wholly-owned international operations. All changes in fair value of the derivatives designated as net investment hedges, except ineffective portions, are reported in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
along with the foreign currency translation adjustments on those investments. The Company classifies the cash flows at settlement of its net investment hedges within the
Cash used by investing activities
component of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company assesses hedge effectiveness based on changes in forward rates. The Company recorded
no
ineffectiveness from its net investment hedges for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
or
February 29, 2016
. The Company had
no
outstanding net investment hedges as of
February 28, 2017
.
17
Undesignated Derivative Instruments
The Company may elect to enter into foreign exchange forwards to mitigate the change in fair value of specific assets and liabilities on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and/or embedded derivative contracts. These forwards are not designated as hedging instruments under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, these undesignated instruments are recorded at fair value as a derivative asset or liability on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with their corresponding change in fair value recognized in
Other (income) expense, net
, together with the re-measurement gain or loss from the hedged balance sheet position or embedded derivative contract. The Company classifies the cash flows at settlement from undesignated instruments in the same category as the cash flows from the related hedged items, generally within the
Cash provided by operations
component of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The total notional amount of outstanding undesignated derivative instruments was
$6.6 billion
as of
February 28, 2017
.
Embedded Derivatives
As part of the foreign currency adjustment program described above, an embedded derivative contract is created upon the factory’s acceptance of NIKE’s purchase order for currencies within the factory currency exposure indices that are neither the U.S. Dollar nor the local or functional currency of the factory. Embedded derivative contracts are treated as foreign currency forward contracts that are bifurcated from the related purchase order and recorded at fair value as a derivative asset or liability on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with their corresponding change in fair value recognized in
Other (income) expense, net
from the date a purchase order is accepted by a factory through the date the purchase price is no longer subject to foreign currency fluctuations.
In addition, the Company has entered into certain other contractual agreements which have payments that are indexed to currencies that are not the functional currency of either substantial party to the contracts. These payment terms expose NIKE to variability in foreign exchange rates and create embedded derivative contracts that must be bifurcated from the related contract and recorded at fair value as derivative assets or liabilities on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with their corresponding changes in fair value recognized in
Other (income) expense, net
until each payment is settled.
At
February 28, 2017
, the total notional amount of embedded derivatives outstanding was approximately
$283 million
.
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to hedging instruments. The counterparties to all derivative transactions are major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings. However, this does not eliminate the Company’s exposure to credit risk with these institutions. This credit risk is limited to the unrealized gains in such contracts should any of these counterparties fail to perform as contracted. To manage this risk, the Company has established strict counterparty credit guidelines that are continually monitored.
The Company’s derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features designed to protect against significant deterioration in counterparties’ creditworthiness and their ultimate ability to settle outstanding derivative contracts in the normal course of business. The Company’s bilateral credit-related contingent features generally require the owing entity, either the Company or the derivative counterparty, to post collateral for the portion of the fair value in excess of
$50 million
should the fair value of outstanding derivatives per counterparty be greater than
$50 million
. Additionally, a certain level of decline in credit rating of either the Company or the counterparty could also trigger collateral requirements. As of
February 28, 2017
, the Company was in compliance with all credit risk-related contingent features and had derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features in a net liability position of
$2 million
. Accordingly, the Company was not required to post any collateral as a result of these contingent features. Further, as of February 28, 2017, the Company had received
$293 million
of cash collateral from various counterparties to its derivative contracts (refer to
Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements
). The Company considers the impact of the risk of counterparty default to be
immaterial
.
|
Note 10 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
The changes in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
, net of tax, for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
were as follows:
|
(In millions)
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
(1)
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
Net Investment Hedges
(1)
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance at November 30, 2016
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
$
|
546
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
$
|
399
|
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive gains (losses) before reclassifications
(2)
|
13
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
15
|
|
||||||||||
|
Reclassifications to net income of previously deferred (gains) losses
(3)
|
(1
|
)
|
(177
|
)
|
—
|
|
(7
|
)
|
(185
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
12
|
|
(175
|
)
|
—
|
|
(7
|
)
|
(170
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at February 28, 2017
|
$
|
(206
|
)
|
$
|
371
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
$
|
229
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
The accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment and net investment hedge gains/losses related to an investment in a foreign subsidiary are reclassified to
Net income
upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the respective entity.
|
|
(2)
|
Net of tax benefit (expense) of
$0 million
,
$1 million
,
$0 million
,
$(1) million
and
$0 million
, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
Net of tax (benefit) expense of
$0 million
,
$(1) million
,
$0 million
,
$2 million
and
$1 million
, respectively.
|
18
|
(In millions)
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
(1)
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
Net Investment Hedges
(1)
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2016
|
$
|
(207
|
)
|
$
|
463
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
$
|
318
|
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive gains (losses) before reclassifications
(2)
|
2
|
|
406
|
|
—
|
|
18
|
|
426
|
|
||||||||||
|
Reclassifications to net income of previously deferred (gains) losses
(3)
|
(1
|
)
|
(498
|
)
|
—
|
|
(16
|
)
|
(515
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
1
|
|
(92
|
)
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
(89
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at February 28, 2017
|
$
|
(206
|
)
|
$
|
371
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
$
|
229
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
The accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment and net investment hedge gains/losses related to an investment in a foreign subsidiary are reclassified to
Net income
upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the respective entity.
|
|
(2)
|
Net of tax benefit (expense) of
$0 million
,
$23 million
,
$0 million
,
$0 million
and
$23 million
, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
Net of tax (benefit) expense of
$0 million
,
$(3) million
,
$0 million
,
$1 million
and
$(2) million
, respectively.
|
The changes in
Accumulated other comprehensive income
, net of tax, for the
three and nine months ended February 29, 2016
were as follows:
|
(In millions)
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
(1)
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
Net Investment Hedges
(1)
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance at November 30, 2015
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
$
|
1,181
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
$
|
1,107
|
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive gains (losses) before reclassifications
(2)
|
(113
|
)
|
(151
|
)
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
(261
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Reclassifications to net income of previously deferred (gains) losses
(3)
|
2
|
|
(199
|
)
|
—
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(201
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(111
|
)
|
(350
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(462
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at February 29, 2016
|
$
|
(252
|
)
|
$
|
831
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
$
|
645
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
The accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment and net investment hedge gains/losses related to an investment in a foreign subsidiary are reclassified to
Net income
upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the respective entity.
|
|
(2)
|
Net of tax benefit (expense) of $
0 million
, $
24 million
, $
0 million
, $
(1) million
and $
23 million
, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
Net of tax (benefit) expense of $
0 million
, $
3 million
, $
0 million
, $
0 million
and $
3 million
, respectively.
|
|
(In millions)
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
(1)
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
Net Investment Hedges
(1)
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance at May 31, 2015
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
$
|
1,246
|
|
|||||
|
Other comprehensive gains (losses) before reclassifications
(2)
|
(223
|
)
|
132
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
|
(77
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Reclassifications to net income of previously deferred (gains) losses
(3)
|
2
|
|
(521
|
)
|
—
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(524
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(221
|
)
|
(389
|
)
|
—
|
|
9
|
|
(601
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Balance at February 29, 2016
|
$
|
(252
|
)
|
$
|
831
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
$
|
645
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
The accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment and net investment hedge gains/losses related to an investment in a foreign subsidiary are reclassified to
Net income
upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the respective entity.
|
|
(2)
|
Net of tax benefit (expense) of
$0 million
,
$40 million
,
$0 million
,
$(3) million
and
$37 million
, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
Net of tax (benefit) expense of
$0 million
,
$4 million
,
$0 million
,
$0 million
and
$4 million
, respectively.
|
19
The following table summarizes the reclassifications from
Accumulated other comprehensive income
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||||
|
Gains (losses) on foreign currency translation adjustment
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|||||
|
Total before tax
|
1
|
|
(2
|
)
|
1
|
|
(2
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Gain (loss) net of tax
|
1
|
|
(2
|
)
|
1
|
|
(2
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
$
|
96
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
Revenues
|
|||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
87
|
|
153
|
|
260
|
|
451
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Total selling and administrative expense
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign exchange forwards and options
|
67
|
|
73
|
|
141
|
|
173
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|||||||||
|
Total before tax
|
176
|
|
202
|
|
495
|
|
525
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
1
|
|
(3
|
)
|
3
|
|
(4
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Gain (loss) net of tax
|
177
|
|
199
|
|
498
|
|
521
|
|
||||||||||
|
Gains (losses) on other
|
9
|
|
4
|
|
17
|
|
5
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|||||||||
|
Total before tax
|
9
|
|
4
|
|
17
|
|
5
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Gain (loss) net of tax
|
7
|
|
4
|
|
16
|
|
5
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total net gain (loss) reclassified for the period
|
$
|
185
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
||||||
|
Note 11 — Operating Segments
|
The Company’s operating segments are evidence of the structure of the Company's internal organization. The NIKE Brand segments are defined by geographic regions for operations participating in NIKE Brand sales activity.
Each NIKE Brand geographic segment operates predominantly in one industry: the design, development, marketing and selling of athletic footwear, apparel and equipment. The Company’s reportable operating segments for the NIKE Brand are: North America, Western Europe, Central & Eastern Europe, Greater China, Japan and Emerging Markets, and include results for the NIKE, Jordan and Hurley brands. The Company’s NIKE Brand Direct to Consumer (DTC) operations are managed within each geographic operating segment. Converse is also a reportable segment for the Company, and operates in one industry: the design, marketing, licensing and selling of casual sneakers, apparel and accessories.
Global Brand Divisions is included within the NIKE Brand for presentation purposes to align with the way management views the Company. Global Brand Divisions primarily represents NIKE Brand licensing businesses that are not part of a geographic operating segment, and demand creation, operating overhead and product creation and design expenses that are centrally managed for the NIKE Brand.
Corporate consists largely of unallocated general and administrative expenses, including expenses associated with centrally managed departments; depreciation and amortization related to the Company’s headquarters; unallocated insurance, benefit and compensation programs, including stock-based compensation; and certain foreign currency gains and losses, including certain hedge gains and losses.
The primary financial measure used by the Company to evaluate performance of individual operating segments is earnings before interest and taxes (commonly referred to as “EBIT”), which represents
Net income
before
Interest expense (income), net
and
Income tax expense
in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
As part of the Company's centrally managed foreign exchange risk management program, standard foreign currency rates are assigned twice per year to each NIKE Brand entity in the Company's geographic operating segments and to Converse. These rates are set approximately nine and twelve months in advance of the future selling seasons to which they relate (specifically, for each currency, one standard rate applies to the fall and holiday selling seasons and one standard rate applies to the spring and summer selling seasons) based on average market spot rates in the calendar month preceding the date they are established.
Inventories
and
Cost of sales
for geographic operating segments and Converse reflect the use of these standard rates to record non-functional currency product purchases in the entity’s functional currency. Differences between assigned standard foreign currency rates and actual market rates are included in Corporate, together with foreign currency hedge gains and losses generated from the Company's centrally managed foreign exchange risk management program and other conversion gains and losses.
Accounts receivable, net
,
Inventories
and
Property, plant and equipment, net
for operating segments are regularly reviewed by management and are therefore provided below.
20
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
REVENUES
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
3,782
|
|
$
|
3,683
|
|
$
|
11,463
|
|
$
|
11,029
|
|
||||
|
Western Europe
|
1,499
|
|
1,442
|
|
4,647
|
|
4,382
|
|
||||||||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
362
|
|
359
|
|
1,130
|
|
1,086
|
|
||||||||
|
Greater China
|
1,075
|
|
982
|
|
3,150
|
|
2,806
|
|
||||||||
|
Japan
|
236
|
|
205
|
|
719
|
|
589
|
|
||||||||
|
Emerging Markets
|
950
|
|
879
|
|
2,942
|
|
2,829
|
|
||||||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
55
|
|
61
|
|
||||||||
|
Total NIKE Brand
|
7,923
|
|
7,567
|
|
24,106
|
|
22,782
|
|
||||||||
|
Converse
|
498
|
|
489
|
|
1,488
|
|
1,442
|
|
||||||||
|
Corporate
|
11
|
|
(24
|
)
|
79
|
|
(92
|
)
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL NIKE, INC. REVENUES
|
$
|
8,432
|
|
$
|
8,032
|
|
$
|
25,673
|
|
$
|
24,132
|
|
||||
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
980
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
$
|
2,896
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
||||
|
Western Europe
|
290
|
|
334
|
|
918
|
|
1,126
|
|
||||||||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
57
|
|
69
|
|
196
|
|
243
|
|
||||||||
|
Greater China
|
381
|
|
358
|
|
1,127
|
|
1,015
|
|
||||||||
|
Japan
|
49
|
|
36
|
|
147
|
|
119
|
|
||||||||
|
Emerging Markets
|
193
|
|
202
|
|
601
|
|
701
|
|
||||||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
|
(598
|
)
|
(625
|
)
|
(1,988
|
)
|
(1,874
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total NIKE Brand
|
1,352
|
|
1,277
|
|
3,897
|
|
4,157
|
|
||||||||
|
Converse
|
109
|
|
127
|
|
340
|
|
359
|
|
||||||||
|
Corporate
|
(119
|
)
|
(264
|
)
|
(478
|
)
|
(952
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Total NIKE, Inc. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
|
1,342
|
|
1,140
|
|
3,759
|
|
3,564
|
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
19
|
|
5
|
|
41
|
|
14
|
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL NIKE, INC. INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
$
|
1,135
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
||||
21
|
|
As of February 28,
|
As of May 31,
|
||||||
|
(In millions)
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||
|
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
|
|
|||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
1,860
|
|
$
|
1,689
|
|
||
|
Western Europe
|
416
|
|
378
|
|
||||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
273
|
|
194
|
|
||||
|
Greater China
|
101
|
|
74
|
|
||||
|
Japan
|
106
|
|
129
|
|
||||
|
Emerging Markets
|
604
|
|
409
|
|
||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
|
92
|
|
76
|
|
||||
|
Total NIKE Brand
|
3,452
|
|
2,949
|
|
||||
|
Converse
|
283
|
|
270
|
|
||||
|
Corporate
|
17
|
|
22
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
|
$
|
3,752
|
|
$
|
3,241
|
|
||
|
INVENTORIES
|
||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
2,127
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
||
|
Western Europe
|
992
|
|
929
|
|
||||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
213
|
|
210
|
|
||||
|
Greater China
|
431
|
|
375
|
|
||||
|
Japan
|
166
|
|
146
|
|
||||
|
Emerging Markets
|
616
|
|
478
|
|
||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
|
68
|
|
35
|
|
||||
|
Total NIKE Brand
|
4,613
|
|
4,536
|
|
||||
|
Converse
|
309
|
|
306
|
|
||||
|
Corporate
|
10
|
|
(4
|
)
|
||||
|
TOTAL INVENTORIES
|
$
|
4,932
|
|
$
|
4,838
|
|
||
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
784
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
||
|
Western Europe
|
617
|
|
589
|
|
||||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
46
|
|
50
|
|
||||
|
Greater China
|
210
|
|
234
|
|
||||
|
Japan
|
213
|
|
223
|
|
||||
|
Emerging Markets
|
122
|
|
109
|
|
||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
|
513
|
|
511
|
|
||||
|
Total NIKE Brand
|
2,505
|
|
2,458
|
|
||||
|
Converse
|
121
|
|
125
|
|
||||
|
Corporate
|
1,167
|
|
937
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
$
|
3,520
|
|
||
|
Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies
|
At
February 28, 2017
, the Company had letters of credit outstanding totaling
$152 million
. These letters of credit were issued primarily for the purchase of inventory and guarantees of the Company’s performance under certain self-insurance and other programs.
There have been no other significant subsequent developments relating to the commitments and contingencies reported on the Company's latest Annual Report on Form 10-K.
22
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
NIKE, Inc.
Revenues
for the
third quarter
of
fiscal 2017
increased 5% to $8.4 billion compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2016. On a currency-neutral basis,
Revenues
increased 7%.
Net income
for the third quarter of
fiscal 2017
was $1,141 million and diluted earnings per common share was $0.68, 20% and 24% higher, respectively, than the third quarter of fiscal 2016.
Income before income taxes
increased 17% compared to the
third quarter
of fiscal 2016 as revenue growth, lower selling and administrative expense and higher other income were partially offset by lower gross margin. The NIKE Brand, which represents over 90% of NIKE, Inc.
Revenues
, delivered 5% revenue growth. On a currency-neutral basis, NIKE Brand revenues grew 7%, driven by higher revenues across all geographies, footwear and apparel, and our Sportswear and Jordan Brand categories. Revenues for Converse increased 2% and 3% on a reported and currency-neutral basis, respectively, primarily due to revenue growth in direct distribution markets, most notably the United States.
Our effective tax rate was 13.8% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to 16.3% for the third quarter of fiscal 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in tax reserves related to foreign operations and an increase in the proportion of earnings from operations outside of the United States, which are generally subject to a lower tax rate.
The 24% increase in diluted earnings per common share compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2016 reflects a 3% decline in the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding, driven by our share repurchase program.
|
Results of Operations
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
8,432
|
|
$
|
8,032
|
|
5
|
%
|
$
|
25,673
|
|
$
|
24,132
|
|
6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
4,682
|
|
4,343
|
|
8
|
%
|
14,184
|
|
12,947
|
|
10
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
3,750
|
|
3,689
|
|
2
|
%
|
11,489
|
|
11,185
|
|
3
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Gross margin %
|
44.5
|
%
|
45.9
|
%
|
44.8
|
%
|
46.3
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
|
Demand creation expense
|
749
|
|
804
|
|
-7
|
%
|
2,552
|
|
2,405
|
|
6
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Operating overhead expense
|
1,747
|
|
1,762
|
|
-1
|
%
|
5,346
|
|
5,298
|
|
1
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Total selling and administrative expense
|
2,496
|
|
2,566
|
|
-3
|
%
|
7,898
|
|
7,703
|
|
3
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
% of Revenues
|
29.6
|
%
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
19
|
|
5
|
|
—
|
|
41
|
|
14
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
(88
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
—
|
|
(168
|
)
|
(82
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
1,323
|
|
1,135
|
|
17
|
%
|
3,718
|
|
3,550
|
|
5
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
182
|
|
185
|
|
-2
|
%
|
486
|
|
636
|
|
-24
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Effective tax rate
|
13.8
|
%
|
16.3
|
%
|
13.1
|
%
|
17.9
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
|
NET INCOME
|
$
|
1,141
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
20
|
%
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
$
|
2,914
|
|
11
|
%
|
||||||
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
24
|
%
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
14
|
%
|
||||||
23
|
Consolidated Operating Results
|
Revenues
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency
Changes
(1)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency
Changes
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
NIKE, Inc. Revenues:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIKE Brand Revenues by:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Footwear
|
$
|
5,314
|
|
$
|
5,074
|
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
$
|
15,608
|
|
$
|
14,789
|
|
6
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Apparel
|
2,269
|
|
2,124
|
|
7
|
%
|
9
|
%
|
7,353
|
|
6,827
|
|
8
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Equipment
|
321
|
|
352
|
|
-9
|
%
|
-7
|
%
|
1,090
|
|
1,105
|
|
-1
|
%
|
1
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
(2)
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
12
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
55
|
|
61
|
|
-10
|
%
|
-10
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Total NIKE Brand Revenues
|
7,923
|
|
7,567
|
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
24,106
|
|
22,782
|
|
6
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Converse
|
498
|
|
489
|
|
2
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
1,488
|
|
1,442
|
|
3
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Corporate
(3)
|
11
|
|
(24
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
79
|
|
(92
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||
|
TOTAL NIKE, INC. REVENUES
|
$
|
8,432
|
|
$
|
8,032
|
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
$
|
25,673
|
|
$
|
24,132
|
|
6
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Supplemental NIKE Brand Revenues Details:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIKE Brand Revenues by:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales to Wholesale Customers
|
$
|
5,618
|
|
$
|
5,493
|
|
2
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
$
|
17,316
|
|
$
|
16,991
|
|
2
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Sales Direct to Consumer
|
2,286
|
|
2,057
|
|
11
|
%
|
13
|
%
|
6,735
|
|
5,730
|
|
18
|
%
|
20
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
(2)
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
12
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
55
|
|
61
|
|
-10
|
%
|
-10
|
%
|
|||||||||||
|
TOTAL NIKE BRAND REVENUES
|
$
|
7,923
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
$
|
24,106
|
|
$
|
22,782
|
|
6
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
|||||||
|
(1)
|
The percentage change has been calculated using actual exchange rates in use during the comparative prior year period to enhance the visibility of the underlying business trends by excluding the impact of translation arising from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which is considered a non-GAAP financial measure.
|
|
(2)
|
Global Brand Divisions revenues are primarily attributable to NIKE Brand licensing businesses that are not part of a geographic operating segment.
|
|
(3)
|
Corporate revenues primarily consist of foreign currency hedge gains and losses related to revenues generated by entities within the NIKE Brand geographic operating segments and Converse, but managed through our central foreign exchange risk management program.
|
On a currency-neutral basis, NIKE, Inc.
Revenues
grew 7% and 8% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, primarily driven by higher revenues for the NIKE Brand. All NIKE Brand geographies delivered higher revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 as our category offense continued to deliver innovative products, deep brand connections and compelling retail experiences to consumers online and at NIKE-owned and retail partner stores, driving demand for NIKE Brand products. For both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, revenue growth was broad based as Greater China, Western Europe and Emerging Markets each contributed approximately 2 percentage points of the increase in NIKE, Inc.
Revenues.
North America contributed approximately 1 percentage point for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 and approximately 2 percentage points for the fiscal year-to-date period.
For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, currency-neutral NIKE Brand footwear revenues increased as growth in our Sportswear, Jordan Brand and Running categories more than offset declines in other categories. For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of footwear increased approximately 6% and 5%, respectively, with higher average selling price (ASP) per pair contributing approximately 1 and 3 percentage points of footwear revenue growth for the respective periods. The increase in ASP per pair for the third quarter was due to higher off-price ASP, which was partially offset by lower ASP in our Direct to Consumer (DTC) business. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, higher ASP per pair was primarily driven by higher full-price ASP.
The constant currency growth in NIKE Brand apparel revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 was primarily attributable to growth in Sportswear, while the higher revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 were driven by growth in several key categories, most notably Sportswear, Football (Soccer), Men's Training and Running. For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of apparel increased approximately 6% and 7%, respectively. Higher ASP per unit contributed approximately 3 percentage points of apparel revenue growth for both periods, primarily due to higher full-price ASP.
24
While wholesale revenues remain the largest component of overall NIKE Brand revenues, we continue to expand our NIKE Brand DTC operations in each of our geographies. Our NIKE Brand DTC operations include NIKE-owned in-line and factory stores, as well as NIKE-owned digital commerce. For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, DTC revenues represented approximately 29% and 28%, respectively, of our total NIKE Brand revenues compared to 27% and 25% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2016, respectively. On a currency-neutral basis, DTC revenues grew 13% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017, due to digital commerce sales growth, the addition of new stores and comparable store sales growth of 6%.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, constant currency DTC revenues grew 20% driven by strong digital commerce sales growth, the addition of new stores and comparable store sales growth of 9%.
Comparable store sales include revenues from NIKE-owned in-line and factory stores for which all three of the following requirements have been met: (1) the store has been open at least one year, (2) square footage has not changed by more than 15% within the past year and (3) the store has not been permanently repositioned within the past year. Digital commerce sales, which are not included in comparable store sales, grew 18% and 35% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively. Digital commerce sales represented approximately 28% and 25% of our total NIKE Brand DTC revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, compared to 27% and 22% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2016, respectively.
Futures Orders
Futures orders for NIKE Brand footwear and apparel scheduled for delivery from March 2017 through July 2017 totaled $
12.3 billion
, 4% lower than the prior year period. NIKE Brand reported futures orders include (1) orders from external wholesale customers and (2) internal orders from our DTC in-line stores and digital commerce operations, which are reflected at prices that are comparable to prices charged to external wholesale customers. The U.S. Dollar futures orders amount is calculated based upon our internal forecast of the currency exchange rates under which our revenues will be translated during this period.
By geography, futures orders growth was as follows:
|
Reported Futures
Orders
|
Futures Orders
Excluding Currency Changes
(1)
|
|||||
|
North America
|
-9
|
%
|
-9
|
%
|
||
|
Western Europe
|
-5
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
-6
|
%
|
-2
|
%
|
||
|
Greater China
|
-2
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
||
|
Japan
|
-3
|
%
|
2
|
%
|
||
|
Emerging Markets
|
12
|
%
|
14
|
%
|
||
|
TOTAL NIKE BRAND FUTURES ORDERS
|
-4
|
%
|
-1
|
%
|
||
|
(1)
|
Futures orders growth has been calculated using prior year exchange rates for the comparative period to enhance the visibility of the underlying business trends, excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
|
Reported futures orders are not necessarily indicative of our expectation of revenue growth during this period. This is due to year-over-year changes in shipment timing, changes in the mix of orders between futures and at-once orders, and because the fulfillment of certain orders may fall outside of the schedule noted above. In addition, exchange rate fluctuations as well as differing levels of order cancellations, discounts and returns can cause differences in the comparisons between futures orders and actual revenues. Moreover, a portion of our revenue is not derived from futures orders, including sales of at-once and closeout NIKE Brand footwear and apparel, all sales of NIKE Brand equipment, the difference between retail sales and internal orders from our DTC in-line stores and digital commerce operations, and sales from Converse, NIKE Golf and Hurley.
25
Gross Margin
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
$
|
3,689
|
|
2
|
%
|
$
|
11,489
|
|
$
|
11,185
|
|
3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Gross margin %
|
44.5
|
%
|
45.9
|
%
|
(140) bps
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
46.3
|
%
|
(150) bps
|
|
||||||||||
For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, our consolidated gross margin was 140 and 150 basis points lower than the respective prior year periods, primarily driven by the following factors:
|
•
|
Higher NIKE Brand full-price ASP, net of discounts (increasing gross margin approximately 80 basis points for the third quarter and 70 basis points for the first nine months) aligned with our strategy to deliver innovative, premium products to the consumer;
|
|
•
|
Higher NIKE Brand product costs (decreasing gross margin approximately 190 basis points for the third quarter and 100 basis points for the first nine months) as an increase in the mix of higher cost products and labor input cost inflation more than offset lower material input costs;
|
|
•
|
Unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates, net of hedges (decreasing gross margin approximately 80 basis points for the third quarter and 60 basis points for the first nine months);
|
|
•
|
Lower NIKE Brand DTC margins (decreasing gross margin approximately 50 basis points for the third quarter and 30 basis points for the first nine months) reflecting the impact of higher off-price sales; and
|
|
•
|
Lower other costs (increasing gross margin approximately 80 basis points for the third quarter and having an insignificant impact on gross margin for the first nine months) in part due to lower inventory obsolescence costs.
|
Total Selling and Administrative Expense
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Demand creation expense
(1)
|
$
|
749
|
|
$
|
804
|
|
-7
|
%
|
$
|
2,552
|
|
$
|
2,405
|
|
6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Operating overhead expense
|
1,747
|
|
1,762
|
|
-1
|
%
|
5,346
|
|
5,298
|
|
1
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Total selling and administrative expense
|
$
|
2,496
|
|
$
|
2,566
|
|
-3
|
%
|
$
|
7,898
|
|
$
|
7,703
|
|
3
|
%
|
||||||
|
% of Revenues
|
29.6
|
%
|
31.9
|
%
|
(230) bps
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
31.9
|
%
|
(110) bps
|
|
||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Demand creation expense consists of advertising and promotion costs, including costs of endorsement contracts, television, digital and print advertising, brand events and retail brand presentation.
|
Demand creation expense
decreased 7% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to
lower marketing, advertising and retail brand presentation costs. These decreases were partially offset by higher sports marketing costs.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2017,
Demand creation expense
increased 6% driven by higher sports marketing costs, as well as
higher marketing and advertising costs, primarily to support key sporting events including the Rio Olympics and European Football Championship in the first quarter. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced
Demand creation expense
by approximately 1 percentage point for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017.
Operating overhead expense
declined 1% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 as continued investments in our growing DTC business were more than offset by efficiencies in administrative costs, as well as lower bad debt expense, primarily in North America. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017,
O
perating overhead expense
increased 1% as investments in our DTC business were largely offset by efficiencies in administrative costs and lower variable compensation.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced
Operating overhead expense
by approximately 1 percentage point for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
$
|
(168
|
)
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
||||
Other (income) expense, net
comprises foreign currency conversion gains and losses from the re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies and the impact of certain foreign currency derivative instruments, as well as unusual or non-operating transactions that are outside the normal course of business.
For the third quarter of fiscal 2017,
Other (income) expense, net
increased to $88 million of other income from $17 million of other income in the prior year, primarily due to a $55 million net beneficial change in foreign currency conversion gains and losses, as well as other non-operating items.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2017,
Other (income) expense, net
increased to $168 million of other income from $82 million of other income in the prior year, primarily due to a $77 million net beneficial change in foreign currency conversion gains and losses
.
26
We estimate the combination of the translation of foreign currency-denominated profits from our international businesses and the year-over-year change in foreign currency related gains and losses included in
Other (income) expense, net
had a favorable impact of approximately $24 million and an unfavorable impact of approximately $2 million on our
Income before income taxes
for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively.
Income Taxes
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Effective tax rate
|
13.8
|
%
|
16.3
|
%
|
(250) bps
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
17.9
|
%
|
(480) bps
|
|
||||||
Our effective tax rate for the
third quarter
of fiscal 2017 was 13.8% compared to 16.3% for the
third quarter
of fiscal 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in tax reserves related to foreign operations and an increase in the proportion of earnings from operations outside of the United States, which are generally subject to a lower tax rate.
Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 was
13.1%
compared to
17.9%
for the first
nine months of fiscal 2016. The decline was primarily due to a one-time benefit related to the resolution with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of a foreign tax credit matter as well as a reduction in tax reserves related to foreign operations.
We expect our fourth quarter fiscal 2017 effective tax rate will be approximately
22.0%.
27
|
Operating Segments
|
Our operating segments are evidence of the structure of the Company's internal organization. The NIKE Brand segments are defined by geographic regions for operations participating in NIKE Brand sales activity.
Each NIKE Brand geographic segment operates predominantly in one industry: the design, development, marketing and selling of athletic footwear, apparel and equipment. The Company’s reportable operating segments for the NIKE Brand are: North America, Western Europe, Central & Eastern Europe, Greater China, Japan and Emerging Markets, and include results for the NIKE, Jordan and Hurley brands. The Company’s NIKE Brand DTC operations are managed within each geographic operating segment. Converse is also a reportable segment for the Company and operates in one industry: the design, marketing, licensing and selling of casual sneakers, apparel and accessories.
As part of our centrally managed foreign exchange risk management program, standard foreign currency rates are assigned twice per year to each NIKE Brand entity in our geographic operating segments and Converse. These rates are set approximately nine and twelve months in advance of the future selling seasons to which they relate (specifically, for each currency, one standard rate applies to the fall and holiday selling seasons and one standard rate applies to the spring and summer selling seasons) based on average market spot rates in the calendar month preceding the date they are established.
Inventories
and
Cost of sales
for geographic operating segments and Converse reflect the use of these standard rates to record non-functional currency product purchases into the entity’s functional currency. Differences between assigned standard foreign currency rates and actual market rates are included in Corporate, together with foreign currency hedge gains and losses generated from our centrally managed foreign exchange risk management program and other conversion gains and losses.
28
The breakdown of revenues is as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
(1)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
3,782
|
|
$
|
3,683
|
|
3
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
11,463
|
|
$
|
11,029
|
|
4
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Western Europe
|
1,499
|
|
1,442
|
|
4
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
4,647
|
|
4,382
|
|
6
|
%
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
362
|
|
359
|
|
1
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
1,130
|
|
1,086
|
|
4
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Greater China
|
1,075
|
|
982
|
|
9
|
%
|
15
|
%
|
3,150
|
|
2,806
|
|
12
|
%
|
18
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Japan
|
236
|
|
205
|
|
15
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
719
|
|
589
|
|
22
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Emerging Markets
|
950
|
|
879
|
|
8
|
%
|
13
|
%
|
2,942
|
|
2,829
|
|
4
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
(2)
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
12
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
55
|
|
61
|
|
-10
|
%
|
-10
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Total NIKE Brand
|
7,923
|
|
7,567
|
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
24,106
|
|
22,782
|
|
6
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Converse
|
498
|
|
489
|
|
2
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
1,488
|
|
1,442
|
|
3
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Corporate
(3)
|
11
|
|
(24
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
79
|
|
(92
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL NIKE, INC. REVENUES
|
$
|
8,432
|
|
$
|
8,032
|
|
5
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
$
|
25,673
|
|
$
|
24,132
|
|
6
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||
|
(1)
|
The percentage change has been calculated using actual exchange rates in use during the comparative prior year period to enhance the visibility of the underlying business trends by excluding the impact of translation arising from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which is considered a non-GAAP financial measure.
|
|
(2)
|
Global Brand Divisions revenues are primarily attributable to NIKE Brand licensing businesses that are not part of a geographic operating segment.
|
|
(3)
|
Corporate revenues primarily consist of foreign currency hedge gains and losses related to revenues generated by entities within the NIKE Brand geographic operating segments and Converse, but managed through our central foreign exchange risk management program.
|
The primary financial measure used by the Company to evaluate performance of individual operating segments is earnings before interest and taxes (commonly referred to as “EBIT”), which represents
Net income
before
Interest expense (income), net
and
Income tax expense
in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, and is considered a non-GAAP financial measure. As discussed in
Note 11 — Operating Segments
in the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, certain corporate costs are not included in EBIT of our operating segments.
The breakdown of earnings before interest and taxes is as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
980
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
9
|
%
|
$
|
2,896
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Western Europe
|
290
|
|
334
|
|
-13
|
%
|
918
|
|
1,126
|
|
-18
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Central & Eastern Europe
|
57
|
|
69
|
|
-17
|
%
|
196
|
|
243
|
|
-19
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Greater China
|
381
|
|
358
|
|
6
|
%
|
1,127
|
|
1,015
|
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Japan
|
49
|
|
36
|
|
36
|
%
|
147
|
|
119
|
|
24
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Emerging Markets
|
193
|
|
202
|
|
-4
|
%
|
601
|
|
701
|
|
-14
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Global Brand Divisions
|
(598
|
)
|
(625
|
)
|
4
|
%
|
(1,988
|
)
|
(1,874
|
)
|
-6
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Total NIKE Brand
|
1,352
|
|
1,277
|
|
6
|
%
|
3,897
|
|
4,157
|
|
-6
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Converse
|
109
|
|
127
|
|
-14
|
%
|
340
|
|
359
|
|
-5
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Corporate
|
(119
|
)
|
(264
|
)
|
55
|
%
|
(478
|
)
|
(952
|
)
|
50
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
TOTAL NIKE, INC. EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
1,342
|
|
1,140
|
|
18
|
%
|
3,759
|
|
3,564
|
|
5
|
%
|
||||||||||
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
19
|
|
5
|
|
—
|
|
41
|
|
14
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
TOTAL NIKE, INC. INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
$
|
1,135
|
|
17
|
%
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
5
|
%
|
||||||
29
North America
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Footwear
|
$
|
2,490
|
|
$
|
2,404
|
|
4
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
7,227
|
|
$
|
6,932
|
|
4
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Apparel
|
1,154
|
|
1,115
|
|
3
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
3,744
|
|
3,583
|
|
4
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Equipment
|
138
|
|
164
|
|
-16
|
%
|
-16
|
%
|
492
|
|
514
|
|
-4
|
%
|
-4
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
3,782
|
|
$
|
3,683
|
|
3
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
11,463
|
|
$
|
11,029
|
|
4
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales to Wholesale Customers
|
$
|
2,650
|
|
$
|
2,597
|
|
2
|
%
|
2
|
%
|
$
|
8,111
|
|
$
|
8,024
|
|
1
|
%
|
1
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Sales Direct to Consumer
|
1,132
|
|
1,086
|
|
4
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
3,352
|
|
3,005
|
|
12
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
3,782
|
|
$
|
3,683
|
|
3
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
11,463
|
|
$
|
11,029
|
|
4
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
$
|
980
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
9
|
%
|
$
|
2,896
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
2
|
%
|
||||||||||||
On a currency-neutral basis, North America revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased 3% and 4%, respectively, driven by growth in our Sportswear and Jordan Brand categories, partially offset by declines in other categories, including Running for the third quarter and NIKE Basketball for the first nine months of fiscal 2017. For the third quarter of fiscal 2017, DTC revenues increased 4% due to the addition of new stores, digital commerce sales growth and comparable store sales growth of 1%. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, DTC revenues grew 12% driven by digital commerce sales growth, comparable store sales growth of 5% and the addition of new stores. T
he broader retail marketplace in North America is also being impacted by several significant trends, including shifting consumer traffic patterns across digital and physical channels, retail consolidation and an increasingly promotional environment.
The currency-neutral footwear revenue growth for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was attributable to growth in our Sportswear and Jordan Brand categories, partially offset by declines in other categories. Unit sales of footwear for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 increased approximately 4%, while lower ASP per pair reduced footwear revenue growth by approximately 1 percentage point primarily due to lower ASP in our DTC business resulting from higher off-price sales. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of footwear increased approximately 4%, while ASP per pair was flat as higher off-price ASP was offset by unfavorable off-price mix.
The increase in constant currency apparel revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was due to growth concentrated in our Sportswear category, partially offset by declines in other categories. Third quarter unit sales of apparel increased approximately 1%, while higher ASP per unit contributed approximately 2 percentage points of apparel revenue growth primarily due to higher DTC and full-price ASPs, which were partially offset by lower off-price ASP. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of apparel increased approximately 4%, while ASP per unit was flat as higher full-price ASP was offset by lower off-price ASP and unfavorable off-price mix.
EBIT increased 9% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 driven by revenue growth, gross margin expansion and lower selling and administrative expense. Gross margin increased 40 basis points as higher full-price ASP and lower other costs, including inventory obsolescence, were only partially offset by higher product costs and the impact of increased off-price sales through our DTC business. Selling and administrative expense declined as lower demand creation expense more than offset higher operating overhead. Demand creation expense decreased primarily due to lower marketing expense for brand events, while operating overhead increased as continued investments in our growing DTC business more than offset lower bad debt expense compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2016.
EBIT grew 2% for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 as higher revenues were largely offset by gross margin contraction and higher selling and administrative expense.
Gross margin decreased 30 basis points as higher full-price ASP was more than offset by increased off-price mix as a result of clearing excess inventories through off-price channels, including through our DTC business. S
elling and administrative expense grew due to higher operating overhead as continued investments in our growing DTC business more than offset a reduction in administrative costs and lower bad debt expense. Demand creation also increased as higher sports marketing and retail brand presentation costs were only partially offset by lower advertising costs.
30
Western Europe
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Footwear
|
$
|
990
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
1
|
%
|
6
|
%
|
$
|
3,002
|
|
$
|
2,958
|
|
1
|
%
|
6
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Apparel
|
445
|
|
392
|
|
14
|
%
|
21
|
%
|
1,430
|
|
1,217
|
|
18
|
%
|
23
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Equipment
|
64
|
|
65
|
|
-2
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
215
|
|
207
|
|
4
|
%
|
9
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
4
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
$
|
4,647
|
|
$
|
4,382
|
|
6
|
%
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales to Wholesale Customers
|
$
|
1,062
|
|
$
|
1,078
|
|
-1
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
$
|
3,344
|
|
$
|
3,335
|
|
0
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Sales Direct to Consumer
|
437
|
|
364
|
|
20
|
%
|
28
|
%
|
1,303
|
|
1,047
|
|
24
|
%
|
30
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
4
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
$
|
4,647
|
|
$
|
4,382
|
|
6
|
%
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
$
|
290
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
-13
|
%
|
$
|
918
|
|
$
|
1,126
|
|
-18
|
%
|
||||||||||||
On a currency-neutral basis, Western Europe revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 grew 10% and 11%, respectively, due to higher revenues in every territory. Revenue growth for the third quarter was led by Western Europe's largest territory, the UK & Ireland, which grew 7%, and by France, which grew 13%. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, growth was broad-based across all territories, led by the UK & Ireland, which grew 8%. On a category basis, revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased in nearly all key categories led by Sportswear, Running and Football (Soccer), with the Jordan Brand also contributing to year-to-date growth.
DTC revenues increased 28% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 driven by strong digital commerce sales growth, comparable store sales growth of 17% and the addition of new stores. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, DTC revenues increased 30% fueled by comparable store sales growth of 17%, significant digital commerce sales growth and the addition of new stores.
Currency-neutral footwear revenue growth for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was led by Sportswear and Running, partially offset by declines concentrated in Football (Soccer) for the year-to-date period. For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of footwear increased approximately 5% and 2%, respectively, while higher ASP per pair contributed approximately 1 and 4 percentage points of footwear revenue growth for the respective periods. Higher ASP per pair for the third quarter was due to the favorable impact of growth in our DTC business. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, higher ASP per pair was primarily driven by the favorable impact of growth in our DTC business and higher full-price ASP, partially offset by higher off-price mix.
The increase in constant currency apparel revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was due to growth in nearly every category, most notably Sportswear and Football (Soccer). Unit sales of apparel increased 16% for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, while higher ASP per unit contributed approximately 5 and 7 percentage points of apparel revenue growth for the respective periods. The increase in ASP per unit for both periods was primarily attributable to higher full-price ASP and the favorable impact of growth in our DTC business.
On a reported basis, EBIT decreased 13% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017, in part reflecting the negative impact of weakening foreign currency exchange rates. Reported revenue growth and selling and administrative expense leverage were more than offset by significantly lower gross margin. Gross margin declined 440 basis points primarily driven by the effects of unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates and higher product costs. S
elling and administrative expense increased due to higher operating overhead resulting from increased investments in our growing DTC business, which more than offset a decline in variable compensation, administrative cost efficiencies and lower bad debt expense. Demand creation expense also increased, primarily due to higher sports marketing and advertising costs, which were partially offset by lower marketing and retail brand presentation costs.
In part reflecting the negative impact of translation, reported EBIT declined 18% for the first nine months of fiscal 2017.
H
igher reported revenues and selling and administrative expense leverage were more than offset by significant gross margin contraction.
Gross margin declined 590 basis points primarily driven by the effects of unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates.
Selling and administrative expense increased due to higher demand creation expense primarily resulting from an increase in sports marketing costs and advertising expense. Operating overhead also increased due to continued investments in our growing DTC business, partially offset by lower administrative and variable compensation costs.
31
Central & Eastern Europe
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Footwear
|
$
|
232
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
-2
|
%
|
1
|
%
|
$
|
694
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
5
|
%
|
9
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Apparel
|
110
|
|
102
|
|
8
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
368
|
|
361
|
|
2
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Equipment
|
20
|
|
20
|
|
0
|
%
|
0
|
%
|
68
|
|
67
|
|
1
|
%
|
6
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
362
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
1
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
1,130
|
|
$
|
1,086
|
|
4
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales to Wholesale Customers
|
$
|
313
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
1
|
%
|
2
|
%
|
$
|
957
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
2
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Sales Direct to Consumer
|
49
|
|
48
|
|
2
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
173
|
|
148
|
|
17
|
%
|
22
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
362
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
1
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
1,130
|
|
$
|
1,086
|
|
4
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
||||||||
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
$
|
57
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
-17
|
%
|
$
|
196
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
-19
|
%
|
||||||||||||
On a currency-neutral basis, Central & Eastern Europe revenues increased 3% and 7% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, with strong growth in nearly every territory. For the third quarter of fiscal 2017, territory revenue growth was led by Poland, which grew 13%. Revenue growth for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 was led by Russia, Greece and Turkey, which grew 18%, 23% and 9%, respectively, while revenues for our distributors business decreased 8%. On a category basis, revenue growth for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was fueled by growth primarily in Sportswear, which more than offset declines in other categories. For the third quarter of fiscal 2017, DTC revenues increased 7% due to digital commerce sales growth, the addition of new stores and comparable store sales growth of 1%. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, DTC revenues grew 22% fueled by comparable store sales growth of 12%, the addition of new stores and digital commerce sales growth.
Constant currency footwear revenue growth for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was primarily attributable to growth in Sportswear, partially offset by declines concentrated in Football (Soccer). Third quarter unit sales of footwear increased approximately 2%, while lower ASP per pair reduced footwear revenue growth approximately 1 percentage point primarily due to lower full-price ASP, largely reflecting higher discounts. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of footwear increased approximately 7%, while higher ASP per pair contributed approximately 2 percentage points of footwear revenue growth. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, higher ASP per pair was driven by higher off-price and DTC ASPs, partially offset by lower full-price ASP resulting from higher discounts.
The constant currency increase in apparel revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 was due to revenue growth in several key categories, most notably Sportswear. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, apparel revenue growth was driven by increases in our Sportswear, Men's Training and Football (Soccer) categories. Unit sales of apparel for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased approximately 8% and 4%, respectively, while ASP per unit was flat and contributed approximately 1 percentage point of apparel revenue growth for the respective periods. For the third quarter, ASP per unit was flat as higher DTC ASP and, to a lesser extent, lower off-price mix offset lower full-price ASP resulting from higher discounts. ASP per unit was higher for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 as lower full-price ASP resulting from higher discounts was more than offset by higher DTC ASP and, to a lesser extent, lower off-price mix.
Reported EBIT for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 decreased 17% as modest revenue growth was more than offset by gross margin contraction and higher selling and administrative expense. Gross margin declined 380 basis points as lower product costs were more than offset by unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates and lower full-price ASP, largely reflecting higher discounts. For the third quarter of fiscal 2017, selling and administrative expense increased due to higher demand creation expense primarily attributable to higher advertising and sports marketing costs. Operating overhead expense decreased as ongoing investments in our growing DTC business were more than offset by a reduction in variable compensation and lower operational infrastructure costs.
On a reported basis, EBIT for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 decreased 19% as revenue growth and selling and administrative expense leverage were more than offset by lower gross margin. Gross margin declined 640 basis points primarily due to significant unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates. Selling and administrative expense decreased as a percent of revenues, despite higher demand creation expense driven by higher advertising and sports marketing costs, partially offset by lower retail brand presentation costs. Operating overhead expense decreased due to lower administrative and variable compensation costs, partially offset by continued investments in our DTC business.
32
Greater China
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Footwear
|
$
|
776
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
8
|
%
|
14
|
%
|
$
|
2,155
|
|
$
|
1,918
|
|
12
|
%
|
18
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Apparel
|
271
|
|
235
|
|
15
|
%
|
22
|
%
|
895
|
|
787
|
|
14
|
%
|
19
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Equipment
|
28
|
|
28
|
|
0
|
%
|
7
|
%
|
100
|
|
101
|
|
-1
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
9
|
%
|
15
|
%
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
$
|
2,806
|
|
12
|
%
|
18
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales to Wholesale Customers
|
$
|
703
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
5
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
6
|
%
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Sales Direct to Consumer
|
372
|
|
310
|
|
20
|
%
|
27
|
%
|
1,079
|
|
843
|
|
28
|
%
|
35
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
9
|
%
|
15
|
%
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
$
|
2,806
|
|
12
|
%
|
18
|
%
|
||||||||
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
$
|
381
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
6
|
%
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||||||
On a currency-neutral basis, Greater China revenues grew 15% and 18% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively. Nearly all key categories grew, led by Sportswear, Running and the Jordan Brand. DTC revenues increased 27% and 35% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, fueled by strong digital commerce sales growth, the addition of new stores and increases in comparable store sales of 7% and 8%, respectively.
The constant currency growth in footwear revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was attributable to increases in nearly all key categories, most notably Running, Sportswear and the Jordan Brand. Third quarter unit sales of footwear increased approximately 14%, while ASP per pair was flat as lower DTC ASP and unfavorable off-price mix offset higher off-price and full-price ASPs. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of footwear increased approximately 19%, while ASP per pair reduced footwear revenue growth by approximately 1 percentage point as higher full-price and off-price ASPs were more than offset by unfavorable off-price mix and lower DTC ASP.
Constant currency apparel revenue growth for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was due to higher revenues in nearly all key categories, led by Sportswear and Running. Unit sales of apparel for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased approximately 19% and 18%, respectively, while higher ASP per unit increased apparel revenue growth by approximately 3 and 1 percentage points for the respective periods. The increase in ASP for both periods was attributable to higher full-price ASP partially offset by lower ASP in our DTC business.
On a reported basis, EBIT for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 increased 6% despite the negative impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. EBIT growth was driven by reported revenue growth and selling and administrative expense leverage, partially offset by lower gross margin.
Gross margin declined 210 basis points as higher full-price ASP was more than offset by unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates, higher product costs and lower DTC margin. Selling and administrative expense increased as higher operating overhead, primarily to support our growing DTC business, more than offset slightly lower demand creation. The decrease in demand creation expense was attributable to lower retail brand presentation costs, which more than offset higher advertising and marketing costs.
Despite the negative impact of translation, reported EBIT increased 11% for the first nine months of fiscal 2017, driven by higher revenues and selling and administrative expense leverage, partially offset by lower gross margin.
Gross margin contracted 200 basis points primarily due to unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates and higher product costs.
Selling and administrative expense increased due to higher operating overhead to support DTC growth. Demand creation expense also increased as higher marketing costs more than offset lower retail brand presentation expenses.
33
Japan
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Footwear
|
$
|
153
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
15
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
$
|
470
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
23
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Apparel
|
67
|
|
52
|
|
29
|
%
|
21
|
%
|
197
|
|
158
|
|
25
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Equipment
|
16
|
|
20
|
|
-20
|
%
|
-24
|
%
|
52
|
|
48
|
|
8
|
%
|
-4
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
236
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
15
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
$
|
719
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
22
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales to Wholesale Customers
|
$
|
147
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
11
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
$
|
468
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
20
|
%
|
6
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Sales Direct to Consumer
|
89
|
|
72
|
|
24
|
%
|
15
|
%
|
251
|
|
198
|
|
27
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
236
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
15
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
$
|
719
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
22
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
$
|
49
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
36
|
%
|
$
|
147
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
24
|
%
|
||||||||||||
On a constant currency basis, revenues for Japan increased 8% for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017. Most key categories grew, led by Sportswear and Running, partially offset by declines in Golf. DTC revenues grew 15% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 due to comparable store sales growth of 18% and the addition of new stores. DTC revenue growth of 12% for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 was driven by comparable store sales growth of 10%, digital commerce sales growth and the addition of new stores.
Reported EBIT for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 increased 36%, in part reflecting the impact of the stronger Yen, driven by higher reported revenues, gross margin expansion and selling and administrative expense leverage. Gross margin expanded 140 basis points as lower product costs and lower other costs, including inventory obsolescence, more than offset unfavorable off-price margin and lower margin in our DTC business. S
elling and administrative expense increased due to higher demand creation expense, primarily driven by higher marketing support for brand events, as well as other demand creation costs. Operating overhead also increased as reduced investments in operational infrastructure and administrative cost efficiencies were more than offset by increased investments in our growing DTC business and the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, reported EBIT increased 24%, also reflecting the impact of the stronger Yen. Reported revenue growth and selling and administrative expense leverage were only partially offset by lower gross margin.
Gross margin declined 190 basis points as lower product costs were more than offset by the impact of unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates, unfavorable off-price margin and lower DTC margin. S
elling and administrative expense grew due to higher operating overhead and demand creation expense. Operating overhead increased as lower administrative and operational infrastructure costs were more than offset by increased investments in our growing DTC business and the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Demand creation expense increased due to higher marketing, retail brand presentation and other demand creation costs.
Emerging Markets
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Footwear
|
$
|
673
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
13
|
%
|
17
|
%
|
$
|
2,060
|
|
$
|
1,940
|
|
6
|
%
|
15
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Apparel
|
222
|
|
228
|
|
-3
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
719
|
|
721
|
|
0
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
Equipment
|
55
|
|
55
|
|
0
|
%
|
2
|
%
|
163
|
|
168
|
|
-3
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
950
|
|
$
|
879
|
|
8
|
%
|
13
|
%
|
$
|
2,942
|
|
$
|
2,829
|
|
4
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Revenues by:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales to Wholesale Customers
|
$
|
743
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
6
|
%
|
11
|
%
|
$
|
2,365
|
|
$
|
2,340
|
|
1
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Sales Direct to Consumer
|
207
|
|
177
|
|
17
|
%
|
19
|
%
|
577
|
|
489
|
|
18
|
%
|
25
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
$
|
950
|
|
$
|
879
|
|
8
|
%
|
13
|
%
|
$
|
2,942
|
|
$
|
2,829
|
|
4
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
||||||||
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES
|
$
|
193
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
-4
|
%
|
$
|
601
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
-14
|
%
|
||||||||||||
On a currency-neutral basis, Emerging Markets revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased 13% and 12%, respectively, driven by higher revenues in most territories. Revenues for three of Emerging Market's largest territories, SOCO (which includes Argentina, Uruguay and Chile), Mexico and Korea, grew 28%, 26% and 14%, respectively, for the third quarter of fiscal 2017, and 40%, 16% and 12%, respectively, for the first nine months of fiscal 2017. On a category basis, revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased in most key categories, led by Sportswear and Running. DTC revenues increased 19% and 25% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, fueled by the addition of new stores, comparable store sales growth of 11% and 10%, respectively, and higher digital commerce sales.
34
Constant currency footwear revenue growth for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was driven by higher revenues in most key categories, led by Sportswear and Running. Unit sales of footwear increased approximately 11% and 3% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, while higher ASP per pair contributed approximately 6 and 12 percentage points of footwear revenue growth for the respective periods. Higher ASP per pair for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was primarily attributable to higher full-price ASP, in part reflecting inflationary conditions in certain territories.
The constant currency apparel revenue growth for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was fueled by increases in most key categories, led by Sportswear, with Running contributing to the year-to-date period. For the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, unit sales of apparel decreased approximately 2% and 3%, respectively, while higher ASP per unit contributed approximately 5 and 11 percentage points of apparel revenue growth for the respective periods. The increase in ASP per unit for both periods was primarily driven by higher full-price ASP, in part reflecting inflationary conditions in certain territories.
On a reported basis, EBIT decreased 4% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017, reflecting the negative impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the Argentine Peso and Mexican Peso.
Reported revenue growth and lower selling and administrative expense were more than offset by lower gross margin.
Gross margin declined 530 basis points as higher product costs and unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates were only partially offset by higher full-price ASP. Selling and administrative expense decreased as lower demand creation expense more than offset higher operating overhead expense. The decrease in demand creation expense was attributable to lower advertising and marketing expense, while operating overhead increased primarily as a result of continued investments in our growing DTC business, partially offset by lower variable compensation and administrative cost efficiencies.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, reported EBIT decreased 14%, in part reflecting the negative impact of translation.
Reported revenue growth was more than offset by gross margin contraction and higher selling and administrative expense
.
Gross margin decreased 400 basis points as unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates and higher product costs were only partially offset by higher full-price ASP.
Selling and administrative expense increased as a percent of revenues due to
higher operating overhead costs primarily resulting from ongoing investments in our growing DTC business. Demand creation expense also increased as lower advertising costs were more than offset by increased marketing support for the Rio Olympics in the first quarter, as well as higher sports marketing costs.
Global Brand Divisions
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
19
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
12
|
%
|
12
|
%
|
$
|
55
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
-10
|
%
|
-10
|
%
|
||||||||
|
(Loss) Before Interest and Taxes
|
$
|
(598
|
)
|
$
|
(625
|
)
|
-4
|
%
|
$
|
(1,988
|
)
|
$
|
(1,874
|
)
|
6
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Global Brand Divisions primarily represent demand creation, operating overhead and product creation and design expenses that are centrally managed for the NIKE Brand. Revenues for Global Brand Divisions are primarily attributable to NIKE Brand licensing businesses that are not part of a geographic operating segment.
Global Brand Divisions’ loss before interest and taxes decreased 4% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 as a result of lower demand creation expense, while operating overhead expense was flat. Demand creation expense declined due to lower advertising and retail brand presentation costs. Operating overhead expense was flat as costs remained largely unchanged compared to the prior year.
Global Brand Divisions’ loss before interest and taxes increased 6% for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher demand creation expense, partially offset by lower operating overhead expense. The increase in demand creation expense was due to higher marketing and advertising expenses for key brand and sporting events, including the Rio Olympics and the European Football Championship in the first quarter. Operating overhead expense decreased as continued investments in operational infrastructure were more than offset by administrative cost efficiencies and lower variable compensation.
Converse
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
% Change Excluding Currency Changes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
498
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
2
|
%
|
3
|
%
|
$
|
1,488
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
3
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
|
$
|
109
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
-14
|
%
|
$
|
340
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
-5
|
%
|
||||||||||||
In territories we define as “direct distribution markets,” Converse designs, markets and sells products directly to distributors and wholesale customers, and to consumers through DTC operations. The largest direct distribution markets are the United States, the United Kingdom and China. We do not own the Converse trademarks in Japan and accordingly do not earn revenues in Japan. Territories other than direct distribution markets and Japan are serviced by third-party licensees who pay royalty revenues to Converse for the use of its registered trademarks and other intellectual property rights.
35
On a currency-neutral basis, revenues for Converse increased 3% and 4% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively. Comparable direct distribution markets (i.e., markets served under a direct distribution model for comparable periods in the current and prior fiscal years) grew 2% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017, contributing approximately 2 percentage points of total Converse revenue growth. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, comparable direct distribution markets grew 4%, contributing approximately 4 percentage points of total Converse revenue growth. Comparable direct distribution market unit sales decreased approximately 1% for the third quarter and increased 2% for the first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, while higher ASP per unit contributed approximately 3 and 2 percentage points, respectively, of direct distribution markets revenue growth. On a territory basis, the increase in comparable direct distribution markets revenues for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017 was primarily attributable to growth in the United States, partially offset by lower revenues in Europe. Conversion of markets from licensed to direct distribution increased total Converse revenues by approximately 2 and 1 percentage points for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively. Revenues from comparable licensed markets decreased 11% and 7% for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, reducing total Converse revenue growth by approximately 1 percentage point for both periods. The decrease in comparable licensed markets revenues for the third quarter is primarily due to lower revenues in Latin America.
Reported EBIT for Converse decreased 14% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 as higher revenues were more than offset by lower gross margin and higher selling and administrative expense. Gross margin declined 400 basis points as higher product costs more than offset higher full-price ASP, primarily due to a shift in mix to lower margin products. Gross margin was also negatively impacted by the unfavorable impact of lower licensing revenues, primarily due to market transitions, higher off-price sales and unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates. Selling and administrative expense increased as a percent of revenues due to higher operating overhead expense as lower administrative costs were more than offset by investments in operational infrastructure. Demand creation expense also increased as
lower retail brand presentation costs were more than offset by higher advertising and marketing expenses.
On a reported basis, Converse EBIT declined 5% for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 as revenue growth and lower selling and administrative expense were more than offset by gross margin contraction. Gross margin decreased 410 basis points as higher product costs more than offset higher full-price ASP, primarily due to a shift in mix to lower margin products. Gross margin also contracted due to unfavorable standard foreign currency exchange rates and the unfavorable impact of lower licensing revenues, primarily due to market transitions. Selling and administrative expense decreased due to lower demand creation expense, primarily as a result of lower retail brand presentation costs. Operating overhead also declined as investments in operational infrastructure were more than offset by lower administrative and variable compensation costs.
Corporate
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
February 28, 2017
|
February 29, 2016
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
—
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
(Loss) Before Interest and Taxes
|
$
|
(119
|
)
|
$
|
(264
|
)
|
-55
|
%
|
$
|
(478
|
)
|
$
|
(952
|
)
|
-50
|
%
|
||||||
Corporate revenues primarily consist of foreign currency hedge gains and losses related to revenues generated by entities within the NIKE Brand geographic operating segments and Converse, but managed through our central foreign exchange risk management program.
The Corporate loss before interest and taxes consists largely of unallocated general and administrative expenses, including expenses associated with centrally managed departments; depreciation and amortization related to our corporate headquarters; unallocated insurance, benefit and compensation programs, including stock-based compensation; and certain foreign currency gains and losses.
In addition to the foreign currency gains and losses recognized in Corporate revenues, foreign currency results in Corporate include gains and losses resulting from the difference between actual foreign currency rates and standard rates used to record non-functional currency denominated product purchases within the NIKE Brand geographic operating segments and Converse; related foreign currency hedge results; conversion gains and losses arising from re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities in non-functional currencies; and certain other foreign currency derivative instruments.
Corporate's loss before interest and taxes decreased $145 million and $474 million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively. The decreases were due to the following:
|
•
|
a beneficial change of $54 million and $317 million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, related to the difference between actual foreign currency exchange rates and standard foreign currency exchange rates assigned to the NIKE Brand geographic operating segments and Converse, net of hedge gains and losses; these results are reported as a component of consolidated gross margin;
|
|
•
|
an increase in net foreign currency gains of $47 million and $74 million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, related to the re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies and the impact of certain foreign currency derivative instruments
,
reported as a component of consolidated
Other (income) expense, net
; and
|
|
•
|
a beneficial change of $44 million and $83 million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2017, respectively, primarily driven by the impact of lower variable compensation on operating overhead expense.
|
36
|
Foreign Currency Exposures and Hedging Practices
|
Overview
As a global company with significant operations outside the United States, in the normal course of business we are exposed to risk arising from changes in currency exchange rates. Our primary foreign currency exposures arise from the recording of transactions denominated in non-functional currencies and the translation of foreign currency denominated results of operations, financial position and cash flows into U.S. Dollars.
Our foreign exchange risk management program is intended to lessen both the positive and negative effects of currency fluctuations on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows. We manage global foreign exchange risk centrally on a portfolio basis to address those risks that are material to NIKE, Inc. We manage these exposures by taking advantage of natural offsets and currency correlations that exist within the portfolio and, where practical and material, by hedging a portion of the remaining exposures using derivative instruments such as forward contracts and options. As described below, the implementation of the NIKE Trading Company (NTC) and our foreign currency adjustment program enhanced our ability to manage our foreign exchange risk by increasing the natural offsets and currency correlation benefits that exist within our portfolio of foreign exchange exposures. Our hedging policy is designed to partially or entirely offset the impact of exchange rate changes on the underlying net exposures being hedged. Where exposures are hedged, our program has the effect of delaying the impact of exchange rate movements on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements; the length of the delay is dependent upon hedge horizons. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Transactional Exposures
We conduct business in various currencies and have transactions which subject us to foreign currency risk. Our most significant transactional foreign currency exposures are:
|
•
|
Product Costs — NIKE’s product costs are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies in the following ways:
|
|
1.
|
Product purchases denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the transacting entity:
|
|
a.
|
Certain NIKE entities purchase product from the NTC, a wholly-owned sourcing hub that buys NIKE branded products from third-party factories, predominantly in U.S. Dollars. The NTC, whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar, then sells the products to NIKE entities in their respective functional currencies. When the NTC sells to a NIKE entity with a different functional currency, the result is a foreign currency exposure for the NTC.
|
|
b.
|
Other NIKE entities purchase product directly from third-party factories in U.S. Dollars. These purchases generate a foreign currency exposure for those NIKE entities with a functional currency other than the U.S. Dollar.
|
In both purchasing scenarios, a weaker U.S. Dollar reduces the inventory cost incurred by NIKE whereas a stronger U.S. Dollar increases its cost.
|
2.
|
Factory input costs: NIKE operates a foreign currency adjustment program with certain factories. The program is designed to more effectively manage foreign currency risk by assuming certain of the factories’ foreign currency exposures, some of which are natural offsets to our existing foreign currency exposures. Under this program, our payments to these factories are adjusted for rate fluctuations in the basket of currencies (“factory currency exposure index”) in which the labor, materials and overhead costs incurred by the factories in the production of NIKE branded products (“factory input costs”) are denominated.
|
For the currency within the factory currency exposure indices that is the local or functional currency of the factory, the currency rate fluctuation affecting the product cost is recorded within
Inventories
and is recognized in
Cost of sales
when the related product is sold to a third-party. All currencies within the indices, excluding the U.S. Dollar and the local or functional currency of the factory, are recognized as embedded derivative contracts and are recorded at fair value through
Other (income) expense, net
. Refer to
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
in the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.
As an offset to the impacts of the fluctuating U.S. Dollar on our non-functional currency denominated product purchases described above, a strengthening U.S. Dollar against the foreign currencies within the factory currency exposure indices decreases NIKE’s U.S. Dollar inventory cost. Conversely, a weakening U.S. Dollar against the indexed foreign currencies increases our inventory cost.
|
•
|
Non-Functional Currency Denominated External Sales — A portion of our Western Europe and Central & Eastern Europe geography revenues, as well as a portion of our Converse European operations revenues, are earned in currencies other than the Euro (e.g. the British Pound) but are recognized at a subsidiary that uses the Euro as its functional currency. These sales generate a foreign currency exposure.
|
|
•
|
Other Costs — Non-functional currency denominated costs, such as endorsement contracts, also generate foreign currency risk, though to a lesser extent. In certain cases, the Company has also entered into other contractual agreements which have payments that are indexed to foreign currencies and create embedded derivative contracts that are recorded at fair value through
Other (income) expense, net
.
Refer to
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
in the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.
|
|
•
|
Non-Functional Currency Denominated Monetary Assets and Liabilities — Our global subsidiaries have various assets and liabilities, primarily receivables and payables, including intercompany receivables and payables, denominated in currencies other than their functional currencies. These balance sheet items are subject to re-measurement which may create fluctuations in
Other (income) expense, net
within our consolidated results of operations.
|
37
Managing Transactional Exposures
Transactional exposures are managed on a portfolio basis within our foreign currency risk management program. We manage these exposures by taking advantage of natural offsets and currency correlations that exist within the portfolio and may also elect to use currency forward and option contracts to hedge the remaining effect of exchange rate fluctuations on probable forecasted future cash flows, including certain product cost exposures, non-functional currency denominated external sales and other costs described above. Generally, these are accounted for as cash flow hedges in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except for hedges of the embedded derivative components of the product cost exposures and other contractual agreements as discussed above.
Certain currency forward contracts used to manage the foreign exchange exposure of non-functional currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities subject to re-measurement and embedded derivative contracts are not formally designated as hedging instruments under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, changes in fair value of these instruments are immediately recognized in
Other (income) expense, net
and are intended to offset the foreign currency impact of the re-measurement of the related non-functional currency denominated asset or liability or the embedded derivative contract being hedged.
Refer to
Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements
and
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
in the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional description of how the above financial instruments are valued and recorded, as well as the fair value of outstanding derivatives at each reported period end.
Translational Exposures
Many of our foreign subsidiaries operate in functional currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates create volatility in our reported results as we are required to translate the balance sheets, operational results and cash flows of these subsidiaries into U.S. Dollars for consolidated reporting. The translation of foreign subsidiaries’ non-U.S. Dollar denominated balance sheets into U.S. Dollars for consolidated reporting results in a cumulative translation adjustment to
Accumulated other comprehensive income
within
Shareholders’ equity
. In the translation of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, a weaker U.S. Dollar in relation to foreign functional currencies benefits our consolidated earnings whereas a stronger U.S. Dollar reduces our consolidated earnings. The impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our consolidated
Revenues
was a detriment of approximately $132 million and $493 million for the three months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, respectively. The impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our
Income before income taxes
was a detriment of approximately $31 million and $104 million for the three months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, respectively. The impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our consolidated
Revenues
was a detriment of approximately $412 million and $1,780 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, respectively. The impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our
Income before income taxes
was a detriment of approximately $79 million and $407 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, respectively.
Managing Translational Exposures
To minimize the impact of translating foreign currency denominated revenues and expenses into U.S. Dollars for consolidated reporting, certain foreign subsidiaries use excess cash to purchase U.S. Dollar denominated available-for-sale investments. The variable future cash flows associated with the purchase and subsequent sale of these U.S. Dollar denominated investments at non-U.S. Dollar functional currency subsidiaries creates a foreign currency exposure that qualifies for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. We utilize forward contracts and/or options to mitigate the variability of the forecasted future purchases and sales of these U.S. Dollar investments. The combination of the purchase and sale of the U.S. Dollar investment and the hedging instrument has the effect of partially offsetting the year-over-year foreign currency translation impact on net earnings in the period the investments are sold. Hedges of the purchase of U.S. Dollar denominated available-for-sale investments are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
Refer to
Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements
and
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
in the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional description of how the above financial instruments are valued and recorded as well as the fair value of outstanding derivatives at each reported period end.
We estimate the combination of translation of foreign currency-denominated profits from our international businesses and the year-over-year change in foreign currency related gains and losses included in
Other (income) expense, net
had a favorable impact of approximately $24 million and an unfavorable impact of approximately $2 million on our
Income before income taxes
for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
, respectively.
Net Investments in Foreign Subsidiaries
We are also exposed to the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on our investments in wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries denominated in a currency other than the U.S. Dollar, which could adversely impact the U.S. Dollar value of these investments, and therefore the value of future repatriated earnings. We have, in the past, hedged and may, in the future, hedge net investment positions in certain foreign subsidiaries to mitigate the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations on these net investments. These hedges are accounted for in accordance with U.S. GAAP. There were no outstanding net investment hedges as of
February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
. There were no cash flows from net investment hedge settlements for the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2017
and
February 29, 2016
.
38
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
Cash Flow Activity
Cash provided by operations
was
$2,751 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 compared to
$1,912 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Our primary source of operating cash flows for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 was
Net income
of
$3,232 million
compared to
$2,914 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Operating cash flows also increased due to changes in working capital, which resulted in a cash outflow of
$882 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 compared to an outflow of
$1,863 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2016. The change in working capital was primarily due to an $818 million net change in the amount of posted cash collateral with derivative counterparties as a result of hedging activities. For the first nine months of fiscal 2017, cash collateral received from counterparties increased $188 million as compared to a decrease of $630 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Refer to the Credit Risk section of
Note 9 — Risk Management and Derivatives
in the accompanying
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional detail.
Cash used by investing activities
was
$488 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 compared to
$544 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2016. The primary driver of the change in
Cash used by investing activities
was a reduction in cash used for property, plant and equipment additions from
$901 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2016 to
$776 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2017.
Cash used by investing activities
also decreased as a result of an increase in net sales/maturities of short-term investments (including sales, maturities and purchases) of
$201 million
in the first nine months of fiscal 2016 compared to
$309 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2017. These declines in cash used by investing activities were partly offset by the maturity of reverse repurchase agreements of
$150 million
in the first nine months of fiscal 2016 which did not recur in the first nine months of fiscal 2017.
Cash used by financing activities
was
$1,350 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 compared to
$2,045 million
for the first nine months of fiscal 2016, primarily driven by increased proceeds from the issuance of debt and lower share repurchases, partially offset by higher dividends.
During the first nine months of fiscal 2017, we purchased
44.8 million
shares of NIKE's Class B Common Stock for
$2,429 million
(an average price of
$54.23
per share) under the four-year, $12 billion share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors in November 2015. As of
February 28, 2017
, we had repurchased
64.9 million
shares at a cost of approximately
$3,617 million
(an average price of
$55.78
per share) under this program. We continue to expect funding of share repurchases will come from operating cash flows, excess cash and/or proceeds from debt. The timing and the amount of shares purchased will be dictated by our capital needs and stock market conditions.
Capital Resources
On July 21, 2016, we filed a shelf registration statement (the “Shelf”) with the SEC which permits us to issue an unlimited amount of debt securities. The Shelf expires on July 21, 2019. On October 21, 2016, we issued $1.5 billion of senior notes with tranches maturing in 2026 and 2046. The 2026 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion at a 2.375% fixed, annual interest rate and will mature on November 1, 2026. The 2046 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $500 million at a 3.375% fixed, annual interest rate and will mature on November 1, 2046. Interest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The issuance resulted in proceeds before expenses of $1,493 million. Refer to
Note 5 — Long-Term Debt
in the accompanying Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional detail on
Long-term debt
.
On August 28, 2015, we entered into a committed credit facility agreement with a syndicate of banks, which provides for up to $2 billion of borrowings. The facility matures August 28, 2020, with a one year extension option prior to any anniversary of the closing date, provided that in no event shall it extend beyond August 28, 2022. As of and for the
nine month period ended
February 28, 2017
, we had no amounts outstanding under the committed credit facility.
We currently have long-term debt ratings of AA- and A1 from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Moody's Investor Services, respectively. If our long-term debt rating were to decline, the facility fee and interest rate under our committed credit facility would increase. Conversely, if our long-term debt rating were to improve, the facility fee and interest rate would decrease. Changes in our long-term debt rating would not trigger acceleration of maturity of any then-outstanding borrowings or any future borrowings under the committed credit facility. Under this committed revolving credit facility, we have agreed to various covenants. These covenants include limits on our disposal of fixed assets and the amount of debt secured by liens we may incur, as well as limits on the indebtedness we can incur relative to our net worth. In the event we were to have any borrowings outstanding under this facility and failed to meet any covenant, and were unable to obtain a waiver from a majority of the banks in the syndicate, any borrowings would become immediately due and payable. As of
February 28, 2017
, we were in full compliance with each of these covenants and believe it is unlikely we will fail to meet any of these covenants in the foreseeable future.
Liquidity is also provided by our $2 billion commercial paper program.
During the nine months ended
February 28, 2017
, the maximum amount of commercial paper borrowings outstanding at any point was $919 million. As of
February 28, 2017
, there were no outstanding borrowings under this program. We may continue to issue commercial paper or other debt securities during
fiscal 2017
depending on general corporate needs.
We currently have short-term debt ratings of A1+ and P1 from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Moody's Investor Services, respectively.
As of
February 28, 2017
, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling
$6.2 billion
, of which $5.2 billion was held by our foreign subsidiaries. Cash equivalents and short-term investments consist primarily of deposits held at major banks, money market funds, commercial paper, corporate notes, U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. government sponsored enterprise obligations and other investment grade fixed-income securities. Our fixed-income investments are exposed to both credit and interest rate risk. All of our investments are investment grade to minimize our credit risk. While individual securities have varying durations, as of
February 28, 2017
, the average duration of our cash equivalents and short-term investments portfolio was 61 days.
To date we have not experienced difficulty accessing the credit markets or incurred higher interest costs. Future volatility in the capital markets, however, may increase costs associated with issuing commercial paper or other debt instruments or affect our ability to access those markets. We believe that existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and cash generated by operations, together with access to external sources of funds as described above, will be sufficient to meet our domestic and foreign capital needs in the foreseeable future.
39
We utilize a variety of tax planning and financing strategies to manage our worldwide cash and deploy funds to locations where they are needed. We routinely repatriate a portion of our foreign earnings for which U.S. taxes have previously been provided. We also indefinitely reinvest a significant portion of our foreign earnings, and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate these earnings. Should we require additional capital in the United States, we may elect to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds or raise capital in the United States through debt. If we were to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds, we would be required to accrue and pay additional U.S. taxes less applicable foreign tax credits. If we elect to raise capital in the United States through debt, we would incur additional interest expense
.
Contractual Obligations
As a result of our October 2016 debt issuance, cash payments due on long-term debt have increased from what was reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
.
Long-term debt obligations as of
February 28, 2017
are as follows:
|
Description of Commitment
|
Cash Payments Due During the Year Ending May 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In millions)
|
Remainder of 2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-Term Debt
(1)
|
$
|
55
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
$
|
5,944
|
|
|||||||
|
(1)
|
The cash payments due for long-term debt include estimated interest payments. Estimates of interest payments are based on outstanding principal amounts, applicable fixed interest rates or currently effective interest rates as of
February 28, 2017
(if variable), timing of scheduled payments and the term of the debt obligations.
|
Other than the changes reported above, there have been no significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
February 28, 2017
, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
|
New Accounting Pronouncements
|
Refer to
Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
in the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for recently adopted and recently issued accounting standards.
|
Critical Accounting Policies
|
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Actual results could differ from the estimates we use in applying our critical accounting policies. We are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially different amounts being reported.
40
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Other than the items noted below, as well as the termination of our forward-starting interest rate swaps, there have been no material changes from the information previously reported under Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
.
Changes regarding interest rate risk from the information previously reported under Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
are as follows:
|
|
Expected Maturity Date
Year Ending May 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Remainder of 2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term U.S. Dollar debt — Fixed rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Principal payments
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
$
|
3,332
|
|
||||||||
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.0
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”) reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We carry out a variety of ongoing procedures under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of
February 28, 2017
.
We have continued several transformation initiatives to centralize and simplify our business processes and systems. These are long-term initiatives, which we believe will enhance our internal control over financial reporting due to increased automation and further integration of related processes. We will continue to monitor our internal control over financial reporting for effectiveness throughout the transformation.
There have not been any other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
41
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Analyst Reports
Certain written and oral statements, other than purely historic information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to NIKE’s business plans, objectives and expected operating results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, made or incorporated by reference from time to time by NIKE or its representatives in this report, other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases, conferences or otherwise, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. Certain factors, including various risks and uncertainties, may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties are detailed from time to time in reports filed by NIKE with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including reports filed on Forms 8-K, 10-Q and 10-K, and include, among others, the following: international, national and local general economic and market conditions; the size and growth of the overall athletic footwear, apparel and equipment markets; intense competition among designers, marketers, distributors and sellers of athletic footwear, apparel and equipment for consumers and endorsers; demographic changes; changes in consumer preferences; popularity of particular designs, categories of products and sports; seasonal and geographic demand for NIKE products; difficulties in anticipating or forecasting changes in consumer preferences, consumer demand for NIKE products and the various market factors described above; difficulties in implementing, operating and maintaining NIKE’s increasingly complex information systems and controls, including, without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply planning and inventory control; interruptions in data and information technology systems; consumer data security; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results, including, without limitation, the fact that advance futures orders may not be indicative of future revenues due to changes in shipment timing, the changing mix of futures and at-once orders and discounts, order cancellations and returns; the ability of NIKE to sustain, manage or forecast its growth and inventories; the size, timing and mix of purchases of NIKE’s products; increases in the cost of materials, labor and energy used to manufacture products, new product development and introduction; the ability of NIKE to secure and protect trademarks, patents and other intellectual property; product performance and quality; customer service; adverse publicity; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; dependence on distributors and licensees; business disruptions; increased costs of freight and transportation to meet delivery deadlines; increases in borrowing costs due to any decline in NIKE’s debt ratings; changes in business strategy or development plans; general risks associated with doing business outside the United States, including, without limitation, exchange rate fluctuations, import duties, tariffs, quotas, political and economic instability and terrorism; changes in government regulations; the impact of, including business and legal developments relating to, climate change; natural disasters; liability and other claims asserted against NIKE; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the effects of NIKE's decision to invest in or divest of businesses; and other factors referenced or incorporated by reference in this report and other reports.
The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors which could adversely affect NIKE’s business and financial performance. Moreover, NIKE operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risks, nor can it assess the impact of all such risks on NIKE’s business or the extent to which any risk, or combination of risks, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
Investors should also be aware that while NIKE does, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against NIKE’s policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, shareholders should not assume that NIKE agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report. Furthermore, NIKE has a policy against issuing or confirming financial forecasts or projections issued by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not the responsibility of NIKE and may not reflect NIKE's current views.
42
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
There have been no material developments with respect to the information previously reported under Part I, Item 3 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2016
.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In November 2015, the Board of Directors approved a four-year, $12 billion share repurchase program. As of
February 28, 2017
, the Company had repurchased
64.9 million
shares at an average price of
$55.78
per share for a total approximate cost of
$3.6 billion
under this program. We intend to use excess cash, future cash from operations and/or proceeds from debt to fund repurchases.
The following table presents a summary of share repurchases made by NIKE under this program during the quarter ended
February 28, 2017
:
|
Period
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average Price Paid per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
(In millions)
|
||||||||||
|
December 1 — December 31, 2016
|
2,100,000
|
|
$
|
51.43
|
|
2,100,000
|
|
$
|
8,749
|
|
||||
|
January 1 — January 31, 2017
|
2,000,000
|
|
$
|
52.84
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
$
|
8,644
|
|
||||
|
February 1 — February 28, 2017
|
4,754,546
|
|
$
|
54.87
|
|
4,754,546
|
|
$
|
8,383
|
|
||||
|
|
8,854,546
|
|
$
|
53.60
|
|
8,854,546
|
|
|
||||||
43
ITEM 6. Exhibits
(a) EXHIBITS:
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2015).
|
|
3.2
|
|
Third Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 21, 2013).
|
|
4.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (see Exhibit 3.1).
|
|
4.2
|
|
Third Restated Bylaws, as amended (see Exhibit 3.2).
|
|
4.3
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2016, by and between NIKE, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, including the form of 2.375% Notes due 2026 and form of 3.375% Notes due 2046 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed October 21, 2016).
|
|
|
31.1†
|
|
Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
31.2†
|
|
Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32.1†
|
|
Section 1350 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
32.2†
|
|
Section 1350 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
†
|
Furnished herewith
|
44
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
NIKE, Inc.
an Oregon Corporation
|
|
|
/S/ ANDREW CAMPION
|
|
|
Andrew Campion
Chief Financial Officer and Authorized Officer
|
|
DATED:
April 4, 2017
45
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2015).
|
|
3.2
|
|
Third Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 21, 2013).
|
|
4.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (see Exhibit 3.1).
|
|
4.2
|
|
Third Restated Bylaws, as amended (see Exhibit 3.2).
|
|
4.3
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2016, by and between NIKE, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, including the form of 2.375% Notes due 2026 and form of 3.375% Notes due 2046 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed October 21, 2016).
|
|
|
31.1†
|
|
Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
31.2†
|
|
Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32.1†
|
|
Section 1350 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
32.2†
|
|
Section 1350 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
†
|
Furnished herewith
|
46
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I - Financial InformationprintItem 1. Financial StatementsprintNote 1 Summary Of Significant Accounting PoliciesprintNote 2 InventoriesprintNote 3 Accrued LiabilitiesprintNote 4 Fair Value MeasurementsprintNote 9 Risk Management and DerivativesprintNote 5 Long-term DebtprintNote 6 Income TaxesprintNote 7 Common Stock and Stock-based CompensationprintNote 8 Earnings Per ShareprintNote 10 Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeprintNote 11 Operating SegmentsprintNote 12 Commitments and ContingenciesprintItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsprintItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskprintItem 4. Controls and ProceduresprintPart II - Other InformationprintItem 1. Legal ProceedingsprintItem 1A. Risk FactorsprintItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsprintItem 6. Exhibitsprint