NNN 10-K Annual Report Dec. 31, 2009 | Alphaminr
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

NNN 10-K Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-K 1 d10k.htm FORM 10-K Form 10-K
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number 001-11290

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland 56-1431377

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

450 South Orange Avenue, Suite 900

Orlando, Florida 32801

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 265-7348

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class: Name of exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
7.375% Series C Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 was $1,371,916,984.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 16, 2010 was 82,916,942.


Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Registrant incorporates by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of National Retail Properties, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Regulation 14A. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
REFERENCE
Part I

Item 1.

Business

2

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

9

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

18

Item 2.

Properties

18

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

18

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

18
Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

19

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

21

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

23

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

44

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

45

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

86

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

86

Item 9B.

Other Information

88
Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

88

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

88

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

88

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

88

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

88
Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

89

Signatures

94


Table of Contents

PART I

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms “registrant” or “NNN” or the “Company” refer to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including the documents that are incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Also, when NNN uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, NNN is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, NNN’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those NNN anticipates or projects are described in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated herein by reference. NNN undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1.  Business

The Company

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments), and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). The Inventory Assets are operated in the TRS.

Real Estate Assets

NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). Inventory Assets typically consist of two types of properties, property for development (“Development Properties or Development Portfolio”) and improved properties (“Exchange Properties” or “Exchange Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties, with an aggregate leasable area of 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 96 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio were leased or operated at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 19 Inventory Properties.

Competition

NNN generally competes with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors, including but not limited to, insurance companies, pension funds and financial institutions, that own, manage, finance or develop retail and net leased properties.

2


Table of Contents

Employees

As of January 31, 2010, NNN employed 57 full-time associates including executive and administrative personnel.

Other Information

NNN’s executive offices are located at 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900, Orlando, Florida 32801, and its telephone number is (407) 265-7348. NNN has an Internet website at www.nnnreit.com where NNN’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) can be downloaded free of charge.

The common shares of National Retail Properties, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), under the ticker symbol “NNN.” The depositary shares, each representing 1/100 th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series C Preferred Stock”), of NNN are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “NNNPRC.”

Business Strategies and Policies

The following is a discussion of NNN’s operating strategy and certain of its investment, financing and other policies. These strategies and policies have been set by management and/or the Board of Directors and, in general, may be amended or revised from time to time by management and/or the Board of Directors without a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Operating Strategies

NNN’s strategy is to invest primarily in retail real estate that is typically located along high-traffic commercial corridors near areas of commercial and residential density. Management believes that these types of properties, generally pursuant to triple-net leases, provide attractive opportunities for a stable current return and the potential for increased returns and capital appreciation. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay property operating expenses such as real estate taxes, assessments and other government charges, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance and capital expenditures. Initial lease terms are generally 15 to 20 years.

In some cases, NNN’s investment in real estate is in the form of mortgages, structured finance investments or other loans which may be secured by real estate, a borrower’s pledge of ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These investments may be subordinated to senior loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans.

NNN holds investment real estate assets until it determines that the sale of such a property is advantageous in view of NNN’s investment objectives. In deciding whether to sell a real estate investment asset, NNN may consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, net cash flow, tenant credit quality, market lease rates, potential use of sale proceeds and federal income tax considerations.

NNN acquires and/or develops inventory real estate assets primarily for the purpose of resale.

NNN’s management team considers certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN may include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio (including but not limited to tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios, profitability measures, industry trends and performance of competitors compared to that of NNN.

The operating strategies employed by NNN have allowed it to increase the annual dividend (paid quarterly) per common share for 20 consecutive years.

3


Table of Contents

Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate

NNN’s management believes that single tenant, freestanding net lease retail properties will continue to be attractive investment opportunities and that NNN is well suited to take advantage of these opportunities because of its experience in accessing capital markets, ability to underwrite and acquire properties, and because of management’s experience in seeking out, identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions.

In evaluating a particular acquisition, management may consider a variety of factors, including:

the location, visibility and accessibility of the property,

the geographic area and demographic characteristics of the community, as well as the local real estate market, including potential for growth, market rents, and existing or potential competing properties or retailers,

the size of the property,

the purchase price,

the non-financial terms of the proposed acquisition,

the availability of funds or other consideration for the proposed acquisition and the cost thereof,

the compatibility of the property with NNN’s existing portfolio,

the potential for, and current extent of, any environmental problems,

the quality of construction and design and the current physical condition of the property,

the financial and other characteristics of the existing tenant,

the tenant’s business plan, operating history and management team,

the tenant’s industry,

the terms of any existing leases, and

the rent to be paid by the tenant.

NNN intends to engage in future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of its status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and that will not make NNN an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Equity investments in acquired properties may be subject to existing mortgage financings and other indebtedness or to new indebtedness which may be incurred in connection with acquiring or refinancing these investments.

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages, Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, and Securities of or Interests in Persons Engaged in Real Estate Activities

While NNN’s primary business objectives and Investment Properties emphasize retail properties, NNN may invest in (i) a wide variety of property types and tenant types, (ii) leases, mortgages, commercial mortgage residual interests and other types of real estate interests, (iii) loans secured by personal property, (iv) loans secured by membership interests, or (v) securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities. For example, NNN from time to time has made investments in mortgage loans or held mortgages on properties that NNN has sold and has made structured finance investments and other loans related to properties acquired or sold.

4


Table of Contents

Financing Strategy

NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategies while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to its stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional retail properties with cash from its $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 37 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately one percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 36 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances.

NNN anticipates it will be able to obtain additional financing for short-term and long-term liquidity requirements as further described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity.” However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy at any time. NNN has not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and does not intend to do so.

Strategies and Policy Changes

Any of NNN’s strategies or policies described above may be changed at any time by NNN without notice to or a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Investment Properties

As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 96 percent of the Investment Properties were leased at December 31, 2009.

The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Properties as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

Size (1) Acquisition Cost (2)
High Low Average High Low Average

Land

2,223 7 109 $ 8,882 $ 25 $ 1,086

Building

135 1 11 17,049 44 1,520

(1) Approximate square feet.

(2) Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

In connection with the development of two Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $14,651,000. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had funded $12,261,000 of this commitment, with $2,390,000 remaining to be funded.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental income.

5


Table of Contents

Leases

Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases, the following is a summary of the general structure of NNN’s leases. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide for initial terms of 15 to 20 years. As of December 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 12 years. The Investment Properties are generally leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant typically will bear responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. In addition, the majority of NNN’s leases provide that the tenant is responsible for roof and structural repairs. The leases of the Investment Properties provide for annual base rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $8,000 to $1,876,000 (average of $213,000). Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume.

Generally, the Investment Property leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease. Some of the leases also provide that in the event NNN wishes to sell the Investment Property subject to that lease, NNN first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the Investment Property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which NNN intends to accept for the sale of the Investment Property.

Certain Investment Properties have leases that provide the tenant with a purchase option to acquire the Investment Property from NNN. The purchase price calculations are generally stated in the lease agreement or are based on the current market value at the time of exercise.

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2009:

% of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
% of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area (2)

2010

2.3 % 36 408,000 2016 1.7 % 13 240,000

2011

2.1 % 21 389,000 2017 4.3 % 27 676,000

2012

3.3 % 34 484,000 2018 2.9 % 24 345,000

2013

4.7 % 39 849,000 2019 4.3 % 42 632,000

2014

5.0 % 44 622,000 Thereafter 66.3 % 676 5,324,000

2015

3.1 % 22 539,000

(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

(2) Approximate square feet.

6


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the diversification of trade of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

% of Annual Base Rent (1)

Top 10 Lines of Trade

2009 2008 2007

1.

Convenience Stores 26.7% 25.7% 23.9%

2.

Restaurants – Full Service 9.2% 8.7% 10.3%

3.

Automotive Parts 6.8% 5.1% 4.9%

4.

Theaters 6.3% 6.1% 4.2%

5.

Automotive Service 5.7% 8.9% 5.2%

6.

Books 4.1% 4.0% 4.4%

7.

Drug Stores 4.1% 4.0% 5.0%

8.

Restaurants – Limited Service 3.5% 3.3% 3.7%

9.

Sporting Goods 3.2% 3.3% 3.9%

10.

Grocery 2.9% 2.6% 2.9%
Other 27.5% 28.3% 31.6%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located as of December 31, 2009:

State

# of
Properties
% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)

1.

Texas 210 20.1%

2.

Florida 85 10.0%

3.

Illinois 39 7.0%

4.

North Carolina 62 6.3%

5.

Georgia 57 5.5%

6.

Indiana 37 4.4%

7.

Pennsylvania 87 4.3%

8.

Ohio 31 3.8%

9.

Tennessee 30 3.1%

10.

Arizona 30 2.8%
Other 347 32.7%
1,015 100.0%

(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

Mortgages and Notes Receivable

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate.

Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008

Mortgages and notes receivable

$ 41,707 $ 55,495

Structured finance investments

- 4,514

Accrued interest receivables

269 387

Unamortized premium

- 84
41,976 60,480

Less loan origination fees, net

- (8 )
$ 41,976 $ 60,472

7


Table of Contents

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests

Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”), a majority owned and consolidated subsidiary of NNN, holds the residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven commercial real estate loan securitizations. Each of the Residuals is reported at fair value based upon an independent valuation; unrealized gains or losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The Residuals had an estimated fair value of $20,153,000 and $22,000,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Inventory Assets

The Inventory Portfolio, which is owned by the TRS, is comprised of two components: the Development Portfolio and the Exchange Portfolio. NNN’s Inventory Portfolio is held with the intent to sell the properties to purchasers who are looking for replacement like-kind Exchange Property or to other purchasers with different investment objectives. As of December 31, 2009, the Inventory Portfolio consisted of 18 Development Properties (12 completed and six land parcels) and one Exchange Property.

The following table summarizes the 12 completed Development Properties and one Exchange Property as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

Size (1) Acquisition Cost (2)
High Low Average High Low Average

Land

527 15 114 $ 8,959 $ 108 $ 1,526

Building

224 2 27 28,717 352 3,668

(1) Approximate square feet.

(2) Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

Governmental Regulations Affecting Properties

Property Environmental Considerations. Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

As of February 19, 2010, NNN has 68 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The Investment and Inventory Properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”). Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with the ADA. The tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but NNN may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of February 19, 2010, NNN has not been notified by any governmental authority of, nor is NNN’s management aware of, any non-compliance with the ADA that NNN’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations.

8


Table of Contents

Other Regulations. State and local fire, life-safety and similar requirements regulate the use of NNN’s Investment and Inventory Properties. The leases generally require that each tenant will have primary responsibility for complying with regulations, but failure to comply could result in fines by governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. If any of the events or developments described below were actually to occur, NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Current financial and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on NNN, its tenants, and commercial real estate in general.

Current financial and economic conditions continue to be challenging and the continuation or worsening of such conditions, including any disruption in the capital markets, could adversely affect NNN’s business and results of operations and the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or the institutions that hold NNN’s cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose NNN to increased risks of default by these parties.

There can be no assurance that actions of the United States Government, Federal Reserve or other government and regulatory bodies intended to stabilize the economy or financial markets will achieve their intended effect. Additionally, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, retailers, consumers or NNN’s financial condition, results of operations or the trading price of NNN’s shares.

Potential consequences of the current financial and economic conditions include:

the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, which operate in the retail industry may be adversely affected, which may result in tenant defaults under the leases due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failures or for other reasons;

the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that NNN finds acceptable, or at all, may be limited, which could reduce NNN’s ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce NNN’s returns from acquisition and development activities and increase NNN’s future interest expense;

reduced values of NNN’s properties may limit NNN’s ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and may reduce the availability of buyer financing;

the value and liquidity of NNN’s short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold NNN’s cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which NNN has made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for NNN’s short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investments or other factors; and

one or more lenders under the Credit Facility could fail and NNN may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain debt or equity capital on favorable terms, if at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to further its business objectives or meet its existing obligations. Debt and equity capital availability in the real estate market is severely strained. Nearly all of NNN’s debt, including the Credit Facility, is subject to balloon principal payments due at maturity. These maturities range between 2010 and 2017. The ability of NNN to make these scheduled

9


Table of Contents

principal payments may be adversely impacted by NNN’s inability to extend or refinance the Credit Facility, the inability to dispose of assets at an attractive price or the inability to obtain additional debt or equity capital. Capital that may be available may be materially more expensive or available under terms that are materially more restrictive than NNN’s existing capital which would have an adverse impact on NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Loss of revenues from tenants would reduce NNN’s cash flow.

NNN’s five largest tenants accounted for an aggregate of approximately 32 percent of NNN’s annual base rent as of December 31, 2009. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of NNN’s tenants could cause substantial vacancies among NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Vacancies reduce NNN’s revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the ultimate sale value of each such vacant property. Upon the expiration of the leases that are currently in place, the tenant may choose not to renew the lease or, NNN may not be able to re-lease the vacant property at a comparable lease rate or without incurring additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.

A significant portion of the source of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is heavily concentrated in specific industry classifications, tenants and in specific geographic locations.

As of December 31, 2009, approximately,

55 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five retail lines of trade, including convenience stores (27 percent) and full-service restaurants (9 percent),

32 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five tenants, including Pantry (9 percent) and Susser (9 percent),

49 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five states, including Texas (20 percent) and Florida (10 percent).

Any financial hardship and/or changes in these lines of trade, tenants or states could have an adverse effect on NNN’s results of operations.

Owning real estate and indirect interests in real estate carries inherent risks.

NNN’s economic performance and the value of its real estate assets are subject to the risk that if NNN’s properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet its operating expenses, including debt service, NNN’s cash flow and ability to pay distributions to its shareholders will be adversely affected. As a real estate company, NNN is susceptible to the following real estate industry risks, which are beyond its control:

changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and outlook,

decreases in consumer spending and retail sales,

economic downturns in the areas where NNN’s properties are located,

adverse changes in local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply, reduction in demand or intense competition for tenants,

changes in tenant preferences that reduce the attractiveness of NNN’s properties to tenants,

zoning, regulatory restrictions, or change in taxes, and

changes in interest rates or availability of financing.

All of these factors could result in decreases in market rental rates and increases in vacancy rates, which could adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

10


Table of Contents

NNN’s real estate investments are illiquid.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, NNN’s ability to adjust the portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. Certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including: (i) debt service (if any), (ii) real estate taxes, and (iii) operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings and could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

NNN may be subject to known or unknown environmental liabilities.

Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

As of February 19, 2010, NNN has 68 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties. In the event of a bankruptcy or other inability on the part of these parties to cover these costs, NNN may have to cover the costs of remediation, fines or other environmental liabilities at these and other properties and may have liability to third parties. NNN may also own properties where required remediation has not begun or adverse environmental conditions have not yet been detected. This may require remediation or otherwise subject NNN to liability including liability to third parties. NNN cannot assure that (i) it will not be required to undertake or pay for removal or remediation of any contamination of the properties currently or previously owned by NNN, (ii) NNN will not be subject to fines by governmental authorities or litigation, (iii) NNN will not be subject to litigation by and liability to third parties, or (iv) the costs of such removal, remediation fines, third party liability, or litigation would not be material.

NNN may not be able to successfully execute its acquisition or development strategies.

NNN cannot assure that it will be able to implement its investment strategies successfully. Additionally, NNN cannot assure that its property portfolio will expand at all, or if it will expand at any specified rate or to any specified size. In addition, investment in additional real estate assets is subject to a number of risks. Because NNN expects to invest in markets other than the ones in which its current properties are located or properties which may be leased to tenants other than those to which NNN has historically leased properties, NNN will also be subject to the risks associated with investment in new markets or with new tenants that may be relatively unfamiliar to NNN’s management team.

NNN’s development activities are subject to, without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks from factors beyond NNN’s control, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages), the risk of finding tenants for the properties and the ability to obtain both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken or provide a tenant the opportunity to terminate a lease. Any of these situations may delay or eliminate proceeds or cash flows NNN expects from these projects, which could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

11


Table of Contents

NNN may not be able to dispose of properties consistent with its operating strategy.

NNN may be unable to sell properties targeted for disposition (including its Inventory Properties) due to adverse market conditions. This may adversely affect, among other things, NNN’s ability to sell under favorable terms, execute its operating strategy, achieve target earnings or returns, retire or repay debt or pay dividends.

A change in the assumptions used to determine the value of commercial mortgage residual interests could adversely affect NNN’s financial position.

As of December 31, 2009, the Residuals had a carrying value of $20,153,000. The value of these Residuals is based on assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. These assumptions include discount rate, loan loss, prepayment speed and interest rate assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. If actual experience differs materially from these assumptions, the actual future cash flow could be less than expected and the value of the Residuals, as well as NNN’s earnings, could decline.

NNN may suffer a loss in the event of a default or bankruptcy of a borrower.

If a borrower defaults on a mortgage, structured finance loan or other loan made by NNN, and does not have sufficient assets to satisfy the loan, NNN may suffer a loss of principal and interest. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN may not be able to recover against all or any of the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy the balance due on the loan. In addition, certain of NNN’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of a borrower. These investments are typically loans secured by a borrower’s pledge of its ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These agreements are typically subordinated to senior loans secured by other loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans. As of December 31, 2009, mortgages and notes receivables had an outstanding principal balance of $41,707,000. If a borrower defaults on the debt senior to NNN’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN’s loan will be satisfied only after the borrower’s senior creditors’ claims are satisfied. Where debt senior to NNN’s loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit NNN’s ability to amend loan documents, assign the loans, accept prepayments, exercise remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy proceedings and litigation can significantly increase the time needed for NNN to acquire underlying collateral, if any, in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.

Certain provisions of NNN’s leases or loan agreements may be unenforceable.

NNN’s rights and obligations with respect to its leases, structured finance loans, mortgage loans or other loans are governed by written agreements. A court could determine that one or more provisions of such an agreement are unenforceable, such as a particular remedy, a loan prepayment provision or a provision governing NNN’s security interest in the underlying collateral of a borrower or lessee. NNN could be adversely impacted if this were to happen with respect to an asset or group of assets.

Property ownership through joint ventures and partnerships could limit NNN’s control of those investments.

Joint ventures or partnerships involve risks not otherwise present for direct investments by NNN. It is possible that NNN’s co-venturers or partners may have different interests or goals than NNN at any time and they may take actions contrary to NNN’s requests, policies or objectives, including NNN’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture or partnership investments include impasses on decisions because in some instances no single co-venturer or partner has full control over the joint venture or partnership, respectively, or the co-venturer or partner may become

12


Table of Contents

insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise unable to contribute to the joint venture or partnership, respectively. Further, disputes may develop with a co-venturer or partner over decisions affecting the property, joint venture or partnership that may result in litigation, arbitration or some other form of dispute resolution.

Competition with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors may impede NNN’s ability to grow.

NNN may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to complete suitable property acquisitions or developments on advantageous terms due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment activities. NNN’s inability to successfully acquire or develop new properties may affect NNN’s ability to achieve anticipated return on investment or realize its investment strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.

Operating losses from retail operations on 12 Investment Properties may adversely impact NNN’s results of operations.

In June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. A third party manages and staffs these operations on behalf of NNN. The results of business operations from these properties are subject to the typical execution risks inherent with many retail operations including: merchandising, pricing, customer service, competition, consumer preferences and behavior, safety, compliance with various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, environmental contamination, unfavorable weather conditions, or other trends in the markets they serve. These factors could negatively impact NNN’s results of operations from these 12 Investment Properties.

Uninsured losses may adversely affect NNN’s ability to pay outstanding indebtedness.

NNN’s properties are generally covered by comprehensive liability, fire, flood, and extended insurance coverage. NNN believes that the insurance carried on its properties is adequate in accordance with industry standards. There are, however, types of losses (such as from hurricanes, wars or earthquakes) which may be uninsurable, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, NNN could lose both its invested capital and anticipated revenues from the property, thereby reducing NNN’s cash flow.

Acts of violence, terrorist attacks or war may affect the markets in which NNN operates and NNN’s results of operations.

Terrorist attacks or other acts of violence may negatively affect NNN’s operations. There can be no assurance that there will not be terrorist attacks against businesses within the United States. These attacks may directly impact NNN’s physical facilities or the businesses or the financial condition of its tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or financial institutions with which NNN has a relationship. The United States is engaged in armed conflict, which could have an impact on these parties. The consequences of armed conflict are unpredictable, and NNN may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on its business.

More generally, any of these events or threats of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economies. They also could result in, or cause a deepening of, economic recession in the United States or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition or results of operations.

Vacant properties or bankrupt tenants could adversely affect NNN’s business or financial condition.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties, including two vacant land parcels, which accounted for approximately four percent of total Investment Properties. NNN is actively marketing these properties for sale or lease but may not be able to sell or lease these properties on

13


Table of Contents

favorable terms or at all. The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from the rejection by any bankrupt tenant of any of their respective leases with NNN could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations of NNN if NNN is unable to re-lease the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31, 2009, approximately one percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased to two tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have the right to reject or affirm their lease with NNN. NNN anticipates the number of vacancies and bankrupt tenants will increase.

The amount of debt NNN has and the restrictions imposed by that debt could adversely affect NNN’s business and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN had total mortgage debt outstanding of approximately $25,290,000, total unsecured notes payable of $962,056,000 and no balance outstanding on the Credit Facility. NNN’s organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that it may incur. If NNN incurs additional indebtedness and permits a higher degree of leverage, debt service requirements would increase and could adversely affect NNN’s financial condition and results of operations, as well as NNN’s ability to pay principal and interest on the outstanding indebtedness or cash dividends to its stockholders. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk that NNN may default on its debt obligations. The Credit Facility contains financial covenants that could limit the amount of distributions to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders.

The amount of debt outstanding at any time could have important consequences to NNN’s stockholders. For example, it could:

require NNN to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, real estate investments and other appropriate business opportunities that may arise in the future,

increase NNN’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions,

limit NNN’s ability to obtain any additional financing it may need in the future for working capital, debt refinancing, capital expenditures, real estate investments, development or other general corporate purposes,

make it difficult to satisfy NNN’s debt service requirements,

limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends in cash on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

limit NNN’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the factors that affect the profitability of its business, and

limit NNN’s flexibility in conducting its business, which may place NNN at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.

NNN’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on its debt, or to retire or refinance such debt will depend primarily on its future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to the creditworthiness of its tenants, competition, and economic, financial, and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that NNN’s business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt or meet its other cash needs. If NNN is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from its business, it may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets or obtain additional financing to meet its debt obligations and other cash needs.

NNN cannot assure stockholders that any such refinancing, sale of assets or additional financing would be possible or, if possible, on terms and conditions, including but not limited to the interest rate, which NNN would find acceptable or would not result in a material decline in earnings.

14


Table of Contents

NNN is obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in its debt that could restrict its operating activities, and the failure to comply with such covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt.

NNN’s unsecured debt contains various restrictive covenants which include, among others, provisions restricting NNN’s ability to:

incur or guarantee additional debt,

make certain distributions, investments and other restricted payments, including dividend payments on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

limit the ability of restricted subsidiaries to make payments to NNN,

enter into transactions with certain affiliates,

create certain liens,

consolidate, merge or sell NNN’s assets, and

pre-pay debt.

NNN’s secured debt generally contains customary covenants, including, among others, provisions:

relating to the maintenance of the property securing the debt,

restricting its ability to sell, assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt,

restricting its ability to incur additional debt,

restricting its ability to amend or modify existing leases, and

relating to certain prepayment restrictions.

NNN’s ability to meet some of its debt covenants, including covenants related to the condition of the property or payment of real estate taxes, may be dependent on the performance by NNN’s tenants under their leases.

In addition, certain covenants in NNN’s debt, including its Credit Facility, require NNN, among other things, to:

limit certain leverage ratios,

maintain certain minimum interest and debt service coverage ratios,

limit dividends declared and paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders, and

limit investments in certain types of assets.

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

Costs of complying with changes in governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

NNN cannot predict what other environmental laws or regulations will be enacted in the future, how future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or how future laws or regulations will affect NNN’s properties. Compliance with new laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws,

15


Table of Contents

may require NNN, its retail tenants, or consumers to incur significant expenditures or impose significant environmental liability and could cause a material adverse effect on NNN’s results of operation.

The market value of NNN’s equity and debt securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility.

As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of NNN’s equity and debt securities depends on various factors, which may change from time-to-time and/or may be unrelated to NNN’s financial condition, operating performance or prospects that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility in such prices. These factors, among others, include:

general economic and financial market conditions including the current global economic downturn,

level and trend of interest rates,

NNN’s ability to access the capital markets to raise additional capital,

the issuance of additional equity or debt securities,

changes in NNN’s funds from operations or earnings estimates,

changes in NNN’s debt ratings or analyst ratings,

NNN’s financial condition and performance,

market perception of NNN compared to other REITs, and

market perception of REITs compared to other investment sectors.

NNN’s failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes could result in significant tax liability.

NNN intends to operate in a manner that will allow NNN to continue to qualify as a REIT. NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. However, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could successfully assert that NNN is not qualified as such. In addition, NNN may not remain qualified as a REIT in the future. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within NNN’s control. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for NNN to qualify as a REIT or avoid significant tax liability.

If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT, it would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and would become subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In this event, NNN could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities and penalties. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, NNN would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost.

Even if NNN remains qualified as a REIT, NNN may face other tax liabilities that reduce operating results and cash flow.

Even if NNN remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, NNN may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease earnings and cash available

16


Table of Contents

for distribution to stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, NNN holds some of its assets through the TRS.

Adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes could reduce NNN’s earnings, cash flow and market price of NNN’s common stock.

At any time, the federal and state income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may change. Any such changes may have retroactive effect, and could adversely affect NNN or its stockholders. For example, legislation enacted in 2003 and extended in 2006 generally reduced the federal income tax rate on most dividends paid by corporations to individual investors to a maximum of 15 percent (through 2010). REIT dividends, with limited exceptions, will not benefit from the rate reduction, because a REIT’s income generally is not subject to corporate level tax. As such, this legislation could cause shares in non-REIT corporations to be a more attractive investment to individual investors than shares in REITs, and could have an adverse effect on the value of NNN’s common stock.

Compliance with REIT requirements, including distribution requirements, may limit NNN’s flexibility and negatively affect NNN’s operating decisions.

To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, NNN must meet certain requirements on an on-going basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts NNN distributes to its stockholders and the ownership of its shares. NNN may also be required to make distributions to its stockholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when NNN’s funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures or to fund debt service requirements. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact NNN’s reported financial performance.

Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how NNN records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Commission, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of NNN’s financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on NNN’s reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, NNN could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements.

NNN’s failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. If NNN fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, NNN may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for NNN to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain its qualification as a REIT and are important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If NNN cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, and the trading price of NNN’s shares could drop significantly.

17


Table of Contents

NNN’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to many factors.

NNN’s ability to pay dividends may be impaired if any of the risks described in this section were to occur. In addition, payment of NNN’s dividends depends upon NNN’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of NNN’s REIT status and other factors as NNN’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Please refer to Item 1. “Business.”

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various legal actions that management believes is routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

18


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The common stock of NNN currently is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NNN.” Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) for the five year period commencing December 31, 2004 and ending December 31, 2009. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2004.

LOGO

19


Table of Contents

For each calendar quarter indicated, the following table reflects respective high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as quoted by the NYSE and the dividends paid per share in each such period.

2009

First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Year

High

$ 17.52 $ 19.48 $ 22.80 $ 21.59 $ 22.80

Low

12.26 14.95 15.85 18.87 12.26

Close

15.84 17.35 21.47 21.22 21.22

Dividends paid per share

0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 1.500

2008

High

$ 23.66 $ 24.00 $ 24.57 $ 23.66 $ 24.57

Low

19.63 20.75 19.60 10.53 10.53

Close

22.05 20.90 23.95 17.19 17.19

Dividends paid per share

0.355 0.375 0.375 0.375 1.480

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

2009 2008

Ordinary dividends

$ 1.495182 99.6788 % $ 1.480000 100.0000 %

Capital gain

0.003051 0.2034 % - -

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

0.001767 0.1178 % - -
$ 1.500000 100.000 % $ 1.480000 100.0000 %

NNN intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders, although all future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, NNN’s financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

In February 2010, NNN paid dividends to its stockholders of $31,026,000 or $0.375 per share of common stock.

On January 29, 2010, there were 1,857 stockholders of record of common stock.

20


Table of Contents

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

Historical Financial Highlights

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005

Gross revenues (1)

$ 243,932 $ 247,352 $ 208,629 $ 180,877 $ 151,831

Earnings from continuing operations

57,690 98,582 77,232 59,232 46,395

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

56,399 119,971 155,742 184,422 95,559

Net earnings attributable to NNN

54,810 117,153 154,599 181,800 89,400

Total assets

2,590,962 2,649,471 2,539,673 1,917,516 1,736,588

Total debt

987,346 1,027,391 1,049,154 890,127 861,045

Total stockholders’ equity

1,564,240 1,566,860 1,417,647 1,109,479 828,087

Cash dividends declared to:

Common stockholders

120,256 110,107 92,989 76,035 69,018

Series A preferred stockholders

- - - 4,376 4,008

Series B convertible preferred stockholders

- - - 419 1,675

Series C preferred stockholders

6,785 6,785 6,785 923 -

Weighted average common shares:

Basic

79,846,258 74,249,137 66,152,437 57,428,063 52,984,821

Diluted

79,953,499 74,344,231 66,263,980 57,965,508 54,418,806

Per share information:

Earnings from continuing operations:

Basic

$ 0.62 $ 1.23 $ 1.06 $ 0.89 $ 0.76

Diluted

0.61 1.23 1.06 0.89 0.77

Net earnings:

Basic

0.60 1.48 2.23 3.05 1.57

Diluted

0.60 1.48 2.22 3.03 1.56

Cash dividends declared to:

Common stockholders

1.50 1.48 1.40 1.32 1.30

Series A preferred stockholders

- - - 2.45625 2.25

Series B convertible preferred stockholders

- - - 41.875 167.50

Series C preferred depositary stockholders

1.84375 1.84375 1.84375 0.250955 -

Other data:

Cash flows provided by (used in):

Operating activities

$ 149,502 $ 237,459 $ 130,147 $ 1,676 $ 19,226

Investing activities

(28,063 ) (256,304 ) (536,717 ) (90,099 ) (230,783 )

Financing activities

(108,840 ) (6,028 ) 432,394 81,864 217,844

Funds from operations – diluted (2)

90,087 142,355 121,602 96,416 81,803

(1) Gross revenues include revenues from NNN’s continuing and discontinued operations. In accordance with FASB guidance on Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, NNN has classified the revenues related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interest which expired, (ii) all Inventory Properties which generated revenues prior to disposition, and (iii) all Investment and Inventory Properties which generated revenue and were held for sale at December 31, 2009, as discontinued operations.

(2) The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of performance of a REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). FFO is defined by NAREIT and is used by NNN as follows: net earnings (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus depreciation and amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry, excluding gains (or including losses) on the disposition of Investment Assets and NNN’s share of these items from NNN’s unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO is generally considered by industry analysts to be the most appropriate measure of operating performance of real estate companies. FFO does not necessarily represent cash provided by operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of NNN’s operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Management considers FFO an appropriate measure of operating performance of an equity REIT because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the

21


Table of Contents

real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as an operating performance measure. NNN’s computation of FFO may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore, may not be comparable to such other REITs.

NNN has earnings from discontinued operations in each of its segments, investment assets and inventory assets. All property dispositions from NNN’s investment segment are classified as discontinued operations. In addition, certain properties in NNN’s inventory segment that have generated revenues before disposition are classified as discontinued operations. These inventory properties have not historically been classified as discontinued operations, therefore, prior period comparable consolidated financial statements have been restated to include these properties in its earnings from discontinued operations. These adjustments resulted in an increase in NNN’s reported total revenues and total and per share earnings from continuing operations and a decrease in NNN’s earnings from discontinued operations. However, NNN’s total and per share net earnings available to common stockholders is not affected.

The following table reconciles FFO to their most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings for the years ended December 31:

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005

Reconciliation of funds from operations:

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

$ 54,810 $ 117,153 $ 154,599 $ 181,800 $ 89,400

Real estate depreciation and amortization:

Continuing operations

43,067 40,850 28,864 19,171 13,355

Discontinued operations

1,209 940 1,518 3,248 7,052

Partnership/joint venture real estate depreciation

178 177 31 463 606

Partnership gain on sale of asset

- - - (262 ) -

Gain on disposition of equity investment

- - - (11,373 ) -

Gain on disposition of investment assets

(2,392 ) (9,980 ) (56,625 ) (91,332 ) (9,816 )

Extraordinary gain

- - - - (14,786 )

FFO

96,872 149,140 128,387 101,715 85,811

Series A preferred stock dividends (1)

- - - (4,376 ) (4,008 )

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends (1)

- - - (419 ) (1,675 )

Series C preferred stock dividends

(6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 ) (923 ) -

FFO available to common stockholders – basic

90,087 142,355 121,602 95,997 80,128

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends, if dilutive

- - - 419 1,675

FFO available to common stockholders – diluted

$ 90,087 $ 142,355 $ 121,602 $ 96,416 $ 81,803

(1)

The Series A and Series B preferred stock issuances are no longer outstanding.

For a discussion of material events affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the selected financial data, refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

22


Table of Contents

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the forward-looking disclaimer language in italics before Item 1. “Business.”

The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Overview

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments), and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). Inventory Assets typically consist of two types of properties, property for development (“Development Properties or Development Portfolio”) and improved properties (“Exchange Properties” or “Exchange Portfolio”).

As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties (including 12 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 96 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased or operated at December 31, 2009. In addition, as of December 31, 2009, NNN had $41,976,000 in mortgages and notes receivable (including accrued interest receivable and structured finance investments) and $20,153,000 of commercial mortgage residual interests. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 19 Inventory Properties, of which 18 were Development Properties (12 completed Inventory and six land parcels) and one was an Exchange Property.

NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009.

NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio and structured finance investments (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to that of NNN.

NNN continues to maintain its diversification by tenant, geography and line of trade. NNN’s highest lines of trade concentrations are the convenience store and restaurant (including full and limited service) sectors. These sectors represent a large part of the freestanding retail property marketplace which NNN believes represents an area of attractive investment opportunity. NNN also has some geographic concentration in the south and southeast which NNN believes are historically areas of above-average population growth. Given these concentrations, any financial hardship within these sectors or geographic locations, respectively, could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and operating performance of NNN.

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, Investment Properties have remained at least 96 percent leased. The Investment Portfolio’s average remaining lease term of 12 years has remained

23


Table of Contents

fairly constant over the past three years which, coupled with its net lease structure, provides enhanced probability of maintaining occupancy and operating earnings.

The poor current economic environment has made it more difficult and more expensive to obtain debt and equity capital, which will likely reduce the pace of investments in new acquisitions or developments as well as the volume of dispositions. Additionally, the poor economic and retail environment will result in more retailers filing for bankruptcy and will make it more difficult to lease properties, which may have an adverse impact on NNN’s occupancy.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments on assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as other disclosures in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, which in turn could have a material impact on NNN’s financial statements. A summary of NNN’s accounting policies and procedures are included in Note 1 of NNN’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio. NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease .  In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases, and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method –  Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight- line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method –  Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate  –  Inventory Portfolio .  The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties

24


Table of Contents

that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS also includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.

Impairment  –  Real Estate. Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interest at Fair Value. Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of 78.9 percent equity interest of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.

Revenue Recognition .  Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance on accounting for leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards with change in Accounting Principles .  Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The new guidance requires the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. The debt component is to be recorded based upon the estimated fair value of non-convertible debt with similar terms. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the period during which the debt is outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. The new guidance has been applied retrospectively.

Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities which also required retrospective application. The adoption of the new guidance on convertible debt and share-based payments resulted in non-cash adjustments to the amounts and per share amounts.

Use of Estimates. Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the recoverability of the income tax benefit, the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income and capitalized overhead relating to development projects. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

25


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio

General. The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Portfolio as of December 31:

2009 2008 2007

Investment Properties Owned:

Number

1,015 1,005 908

Total gross leasable area (square feet)

11,373,000 11,251,000 10,610,000

Investment Properties:

Leased

966 972 892

Operated

12 - -

Percent of Investment Properties – leased and operated

96% 97% 98%

Weighted average remaining lease term (years)

12 13 13

Total gross leasable area (square feet) – leased and operated

10,508,000 10,728,000 10,355,000

NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009.

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2009:

% of

Annual
Base Rent
(1)

# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
%
of Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)

2010

2.3% 36 408,000 2016 1.7% 13 240,000

2011

2.1% 21 389,000 2017 4.3% 27 676,000

2012

3.3% 34 484,000 2018 2.9% 24 345,000

2013

4.7% 39 849,000 2019 4.3% 42 632,000

2014

5.0% 44 622,000 Thereafter 66.3% 676 5,324,000

2015

3.1% 22 539,000

(1) Based on the annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

(2) Approximate square feet.

The following table summarizes the diversification of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

Lines of Trade

2009 2008 2007
1. Convenience Stores 26.7% 25.7% 23.9%
2. Restaurants – Full Service 9.2% 8.7% 10.3%
3. Automotive Parts 6.8% 5.1% 4.9%
4. Theaters 6.3% 6.1% 4.2%
5. Automotive Service 5.7% 8.9% 5.2%
6. Books 4.1% 4.0% 4.4%
7. Drug Stores 4.1% 4.0% 5.0%
8. Restaurants – Limited Service 3.5% 3.3% 3.7%
9. Sporting Goods 3.2% 3.3% 3.9%
10. Grocery 2.9% 2.6% 2.9%
Other 27.5% 28.3% 31.6%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

26


Table of Contents

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located in as of December 31, 2009:

State

# of
Properties
%
of Annual
Base Rent
(1)

1.

Texas 210 20.1%

2.

Florida 85 10.0%

3.

Illinois 39 7.0%

4.

North Carolina 62 6.3%

5.

Georgia 57 5.5%

6.

Indiana 37 4.4%

7.

Pennsylvania 87 4.3%

8.

Ohio 31 3.8%

9.

Tennessee 30 3.1%

10.

Arizona 30 2.8%
Other 347 32.7%
1,015 100.0%

(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

Property Acquisitions. The following table summarizes the Investment Property acquisitions for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Acquisitions:

Number of Investment Properties

8 109 235

Gross leasable area (square feet)

290,000 868,000 2,205,000

Total dollars invested (1)

$ 36,335 $ 355,107 $ 696,682

(1) Includes dollars invested on projects under construction for each respective year.

Property Dispositions. The following table summarizes the Investment Properties sold by NNN for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Number of properties

9 19 37

Gross leasable area (square feet)

234,000 290,000 997,000

Net sales proceeds

$ 15,621 $ 59,796 $ 146,041

Net gain

$ 2,392 $ 9,980 $ 56,625

NNN typically uses the proceeds from property sales either to pay down the outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) or reinvest in real estate.

27


Table of Contents

Property Analysis – Inventory Portfolio

General. The following table summarizes the number of properties held for sale in NNN’s Inventory Portfolio as of December 31:

2009 2008 2007

Development Portfolio:

Completed Inventory Properties

12 11 8

Properties under construction

- 1 9

Land parcels

6 7 6
18 19 23

Exchange Portfolio:

Inventory Properties

1 13 33

Total Inventory Properties

19 32 56

Property Acquisitions. The following table summarizes the property acquisitions and dollars invested in the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Development Portfolio:

Number of properties acquired

2 3 3

Dollars invested (1)

$ 2,633 $ 9,545 $ 64,694

Exchange Portfolio:

Number of properties acquired

- 4 23

Dollars invested

$ - $ 19,994 $ 105,152

Total dollars invested

$ 2,633 $ 29,539 $ 169,846

(1) Includes dollars invested in projects under construction or tenant improvements for each respective year.

Property Dispositions. The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized from the disposition of real estate held for sale included in earnings from continuing and discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007
# of
Properties
Gain # of
Properties
Gain # of
Properties
Gain

Development (1)

3 $ 569 6 $ 4,751 13 $ 5,125

Exchange

1 12 19 4,607 58 5,888
4 $ 581 25 $ 9,358 71 $ 11,013

(1) Net of noncontrolling interests.

28


Table of Contents

Revenue from Continuing Operations Analysis

General. During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN’s rental income increased primarily due to the acquisition of Investment Properties (See “Results of Operations – Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio – Property Acquisitions”). NNN anticipates any significant increase in rental income will continue to come primarily from additional property acquisitions.

The following summarizes NNN’s revenues from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

Percent of Total 2009
Versus
2008
Percent

Increase
(Decrease)
2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007

Rental Income (1)

$ 214,625 $ 210,684 $ 163,669 92.6% 92.4% 91.2% 1.9% 28.7%

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

8,387 7,012 5,591 3.6% 3.1% 3.1% 19.6% 25.4%

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

4,535 5,804 5,268 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% (21.9)% 10.2%

Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests

4,252 4,636 4,882 1.8% 2.0% 2.7% (8.3)% (5.0)%

Total revenues from continuing operations

$ 231,799 $ 228,136 $ 179,410 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1.6% 27.2%

(1) Includes rental income from operating leases, earned income from direct financing leases and percentage rent from continuing operations (“Rental Income”).

Revenue from Operations by Source of Income. NNN has identified two primary operating segments, and thus, sources of revenue: (i) earnings from NNN’s Investment Assets, and (ii) earnings from NNN’s Inventory Assets. NNN revenues from continuing operations come primarily from Investment Assets. The following table summarizes the revenues from continuing operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Percent of Total 2009
Versus
2008
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007

Investment Assets

$ 231,623 $ 228,009 $ 179,079 99.9% 99.9% 99.8% 1.6% 27.3%

Inventory Assets

176 127 331 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 38.6% (61.6)%

Total revenues

$ 231,799 $ 228,136 $ 179,410 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1.6% 27.2%

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

Rental Income. Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, due to a full year of Rental Income from the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet which were acquired during 2008. Additionally, eight Investment Properties were acquired in 2009 with an aggregate gross leasable area of 290,000 square feet. In addition, NNN recorded $5,072,000 as compared to $2,671,000 in lease termination fees and rent settlement fees during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

29


Table of Contents

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants. Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008. The increase is attributable to the reimbursements from certain properties acquired in 2008 as well as reimbursements resulting from the re-leasing of existing vacancies.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions. Interest and other income from real estate transactions decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily due to a lower weighted average principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments during the year ended December 31, 2009. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments was $38,968,000 and $57,475,000, respectively.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests .  Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to December 31, 2008 but remained stable as a percent of total revenue from continuing operations. The decrease in interest income on Residuals is primarily the result of the increase in the loan delinquencies and asset amortization, which is partially offset by a decrease in loan prepayments.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2008 to Year Ended December 31, 2007 .

Rental Income. Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, primarily from the addition of 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet. In addition, the increase in Rental Income is also attributable to a full year of Rental Income from the 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet which were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants. Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants remained consistent as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007, was attributable to a full year of reimbursements from certain tenants acquired in 2007 and the reimbursements from newly acquired properties in 2008.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions. Interest and other income from real estate transactions increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable balance. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable was $57,475,000 and $47,705,000, respectively. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest income earned on the structured finance investments. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s structured finance investments was $8,614,000 and $16,795,000, respectively.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests .  Interest income on the Residuals for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to December 31, 2007, decreased slightly as a result of lower outstanding loan balances. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest income due to the increase in the discount rate from 17% to 25% during the third quarter of 2007.

Gain from Disposition of Real Estate, Inventory Portfolio. Inventory Properties typically are operating properties and are classified as discontinued operations. However, the gains on the sale of Inventory Properties which are sold prior to rent commencement are reported in continuing operations. The slight decrease in the gain from the disposition of real estate is solely dependent on respective sales price and cost basis of the Inventory Properties sold.

30


Table of Contents

Analysis of Expenses from Continuing Operations

General. During 2009, operating expenses from continuing operations increased primarily due to the impairments recorded on real estate. The following summarizes NNN’s expenses from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

General and administrative

$ 21,776 $ 24,878 $ 23,565

Real estate

13,684 10,007 7,805

Depreciation and amortization

46,769 44,181 31,340

Impairment – real estate

28,114 1,234 416

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

498 758 638

Restructuring costs

731 - -

Total operating expenses

$ 111,572 $ 81,058 $ 63,764

Interest and other income

$ (1,375 ) $ (3,748 ) $ (4,751 )

Interest expense

62,151 63,964 51,846

Loss on interest rate hedge

- 804 -

Total other expenses (revenues)

$ 60,776 $ 61,020 $ 47,095

Percentage of Total
Operating Expenses
Percentage of
Revenues from
Continuing Operations
2009
Versus
2008
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007

General and administrative

19.5% 30.7% 37.0% 9.4% 10.9% 13.1% (12.5)% 5.6%

Real estate

12.3% 12.4% 12.2% 5.9% 4.4% 4.4% 36.7% 28.2%

Depreciation and amortization

41.9% 54.5% 49.1% 20.2% 19.4% 17.5% 5.9% 41.0%

Impairment – real estate

25.2% 1.5% 0.7% 12.1% 0.5% 0.2% 2,178.3% 196.6%

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

0.4% 0.9% 1.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% (34.3)% 18.8%

Restructuring costs

0.7% - - 0.3% - - N/C (1) -

Total operating expenses

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 48.1% 35.5% 35.6% 37.6% 27.1%

Interest and other income

(2.3)% (6.1)% (10.1)% (0.6)% (1.7)% (2.7)% (63.3)% (21.1)%

Interest expense

102.3% 104.8% 110.1% 26.8% 28.0% 28.9% (2.8)% 23.4%

Loss on interest rate hedge

- 1.3% - - 0.4% - (100.0)% N/C (1)

Total other expenses (revenues)

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 26.2% 26.7% 26.2% (0.4)% 29.6%

(1) Not calculable (“N/C”)

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation of personnel and a decrease in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate. Real estate expenses remained fairly stable as a percentage of total operating expenses, but increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses from 2008 acquisitions as well as an increase in expenses related to un-leased properties.

31


Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The dollar increase is primarily a result of depreciation recognized on the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet acquired in 2008. This increase is partially offset by the additional amortization in connection with the termination of certain leases during 2008.

Impairment  –  Real Estate. Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long-lived assets for impairments, for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, NNN recorded real estate impairments totaling $28,114,000 and $1,234,000, respectively.

Impairment  –  Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation. In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $498,000 and $758,000 respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Restructuring Costs. During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000 in connection with a workforce reduction. No such costs were incurred during 2008.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, and decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to a decrease of $99,907,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

(i) repurchase of $2,500,000 and $8,500,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in May 2009 and February 2009, respectively,

(ii) repurchase of $3,800,000, $5,000,000 and $25,000,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in March 2009, January 2009 and November 2008, respectively,

(iii) issuance of $234,035,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028, with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in March 2008,

(iv) payoff of the $100,000,000 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,

(v) payoff of the $12,000,000 10.00% secured note payable in February 2008,

(vi) the decrease of $78,860,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, and

(vii) the decrease in weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facility from 3.83% during the year ended December 31, 2008, to 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2008 to Year Ended December 31, 2007.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in the

32


Table of Contents

amount of general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, is primarily related to an increase in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate. Real estate expenses remained stable as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations, but increased slightly as a percentage of total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, is primarily attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses related to newly acquired Investment Properties as well as an increase in expenses related to vacant properties.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is primarily a result of the depreciation recognized on (i) the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet, acquired in 2008, and (ii) a full year of depreciation and amortization on the 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet which were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Impairment – Real Estate. NNN reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, $1,234,000 and $416,000 of real estate impairments were recorded, respectively.

Impairment – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation. In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $758,000 and $638,000, respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, but decreased as a percentage of total operating expense and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in interest expenses is primarily attributable to an increase of $233,201,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by an overall decrease in weighted average interest rate for 2008 as compared to 2007.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

(i) repurchase of $25,000,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in November 2008,

(ii) issuance of $234,035,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028, with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in March 2008,

(iii) payoff of the $100,000,000 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,

(iv) payoff of the $12,000,000 10.00% secured note payable in February 2008,

(v) payoff of $26,041,000 10-year financing lease obligation with interest rate of 5.00% in November 2007,

(vi) payoff of the $10,500,000 10.00% secured note in December 2007,

(vii) payoff of the $20,800,000 variable rate term note in October 2007,

33


Table of Contents

(viii) repayment of mortgage in September 2007, with balance of $7,305,000 at December 31, 2006, and an interest rate of 7.37%,
(ix) issuance of $250,000,000 of notes payable due October 2017, with an effective interest rate of 6.92% in September 2007,

(x) decrease of $5,403,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the revolving Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, and

(xi) decrease in weighted average interest rate on the revolving Credit Facility from 6.24% for the period ended December 31, 2007, to 3.83% for the period ended December 31, 2008.

Discontinued Operations

Earnings (Loss)

NNN classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to its Investment Properties that were sold, its leasehold interests that expired or were terminated and any Investment Properties that were held for sale at December 31, 2009. NNN also classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses of its Inventory Properties that generated rental revenues. NNN records discontinued operations by NNN’s identified segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following table summarizes the earnings from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007
# of Sold
Properties
Gain Earnings/
(Loss)
# of Sold
Properties
Gain Earnings/
(Loss)
# of Sold
Properties
Gain Earnings/
(Loss)

Investment Assets

9 2,392 260 19 $ 9,980 $ 12,112 37 $ 56,625 $ 68,976

Inventory Assets

2 558 (1,551 ) 24 9,347 9,277 69 10,681 9,534

Noncontrolling interests

- - (47 ) - - (2,927 ) - - (1,299 )
11 2,950 (1,338 ) 43 $ 19,327 $ 18,462 106 $ 67,306 $ 77,211

NNN periodically sells Investment Properties and may reinvest the sales proceeds to purchase additional properties. NNN evaluates its ability to pay dividends to stockholders by considering the combined effect of income from continuing and discontinued operations.

Impairment—Real Estate. NNN periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive price. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, NNN recognized real estate impairments on discontinued operations of $6,400,000, $4,426,000, and $1,554,000, respectively.

Impact of Inflation

NNN’s leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on NNN’s results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

34


Table of Contents

The Investment Properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which typically require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses of a property, thus, NNN’s exposure to inflation is reduced. Inflation may have an adverse impact on NNN’s tenants.

Liquidity

General .  NNN’s demand for funds has been and will continue to be primarily for (i) payment of operating expenses and cash dividends; (ii) property acquisitions and development; (iii) origination of mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments); (iv) capital expenditures; (v) payment of principal and interest on its outstanding indebtedness; and (vi) other investments.

NNN expects to meet these requirements (other than amounts required for additional property investments, mortgages and notes receivables, including structured finance investments) through cash provided from operations and NNN’s Credit Facility. NNN utilizes the Credit Facility to meet its short-term working capital requirements. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000. NNN anticipates that any additional investments in properties, mortgages and notes receivables and structured finance investments during the next 12 months will be funded by the Credit Facility, cash provided from operations, the issuance of long-term debt or the issuance of common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The table below summarizes NNN’s cash flows for each of the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Cash and cash equivalents:

Provided by operating activities

$ 149,502 $ 237,459 $ 130,147

Used in investing activities

(28,063 ) (256,304 ) (536,717 )

Provided by (used in) financing activities

(108,840 ) (6,028 ) 432,394

Increase (decrease)

12,599 (24,873 ) 25,824

Net cash at beginning of period

2,626 27,499 1,675

Net cash at end of period

$ 15,225 $ 2,626 $ 27,499

Cash provided by operating activities represents cash received primarily from rental income from tenants, proceeds from the disposition of Inventory Properties and interest income less cash used for general and administrative expenses, interest expense and acquisition and disposition of its Inventory Properties. NNN’s cash flow from operating activities, net of cash used in and provided by the acquisition and disposition of its Inventory Properties, has been sufficient to pay the distributions for each period presented. NNN uses proceeds from its Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of its Inventory Properties. The change in cash provided by operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, is primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations.” Cash generated from operations is expected to fluctuate in the future.

Changes in cash for investing activities are primarily attributable to the acquisitions and dispositions of Investment Properties.

NNN’s financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, included the following significant transactions:

$8,588,000 in net payments on the repurchase of $11,000,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192%,

$6,994,000 in net payments on the repurchase of $8,800,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.84%,

35


Table of Contents

$120,256,000 in dividends paid to common stockholders,

$6,785,000 in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series C Preferred Stock,

$67,354,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 3,766,452 shares of common stock in connection with the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”), and

$26,500,000 in net payments on NNN’s Credit Facility.

Financing Strategy. NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategy while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to NNN’s stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional Investment Properties with cash from its Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 37 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately one percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 36 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances. The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments .  The information in the following table summarizes NNN’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2009. There was no outstanding balance on the Credit Facility at December 31, 2009. The table presents principal cash flows by year-end of the expected maturity for debt obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

Expected Maturity Date (dollars in thousands)
Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Thereafter

Long-term debt (1)

$ 1,007,025 $ 21,022 $ 139,798 $ 69,290 $ 223,898 $ 150,881 $ 402,136

Operating lease

4,557 891 917 945 973 831 -

Total contractual cash obligations (2)

$ 1,011,582 $ 21,913 $ 140,715 $ 70,235 $ 224,871 $ 151,712 $ 402,136

(1) Includes amounts outstanding under the mortgages payable, convertible notes payable and notes payable and excludes unamortized note discounts.

(2) Excludes $7,471 of accrued interest payable.

In addition to the contractual obligations outlined above, in connection with the development of two Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $14,651,000. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had funded $12,261,000 of this commitment, with $2,390,000 remaining to be funded. As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any funding commitments relating to the development of Inventory Properties.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN had outstanding letters of credit totaling $653,000 under its Credit Facility.

36


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any other material contractual cash obligations, such as purchase obligations, financing lease obligations or other long-term liabilities other than those reflected in the table. In addition to items reflected in the table, NNN has issued preferred stock with cumulative preferential cash distributions, as described below under “Dividends.”

Management anticipates satisfying these obligations with a combination of NNN’s cash provided from operations, current capital resources on hand, its Credit Facility, debt or equity financings and asset dispositions.

Many of the Investment Properties are recently constructed and are generally net leased. Therefore, management anticipates that capital demands to meet obligations with respect to these Investment Properties will be modest for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses associated with the Investment Property. Management anticipates the costs associated with NNN’s vacant Investment Properties or those Investment Properties that become vacant will also be met with funds from operations and working capital. NNN may be required to borrow under its Credit Facility or use other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.

The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from vacant properties or uncollectibility of lease revenues could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations if NNN is unable to release the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties (including two vacant land parcels) which accounted for approximately four percent of total Investment Properties held in NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Additionally, as of January 31, 2010, one Investment Property is leased to a tenant that filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, this tenant has the right to reject or affirm its leases with NNN.

In May 2008, one of NNN’s tenants, Uni-Mart, Inc. (“Uni-Mart”), which leased 77 properties, filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. During the year ended December 31, 2008, Uni-Mart elected to reject the leases of 16 properties owned by NNN. NNN had re-leased 15 of the 16 properties as of December 31, 2009. On April 1, 2009, Uni-Mart rejected the leases of 36 additional properties. All of the 36 properties were subject to subleases with convenience store operators and all of the subleases with the operators were assigned from Uni-Mart to NNN effective April 1, 2009. On April 30, 2009, Uni-Mart assumed all of the remaining leases for 24 properties between Uni-Mart and NNN. In January 2010, these leases were assigned from Uni-Mart to other operators, and NNN no longer has any leases with Uni-Mart as of January 8, 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, NNN recorded $3,371,000 and $2,421,000, respectively, of income in connection with the Uni-Mart bankruptcy rent settlement.

On April 20, 2009, one of NNN’s tenants, Titlemax Holdings, LLC and its affiliated companies (collectively, “Titlemax”), which leased 30 Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On February 3, 2010, Titlemax assumed all of its leases with NNN.

Dividends. NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and related regulations and intends to continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Such an event could materially adversely affect NNN’s income and ability to pay dividends.

37


Table of Contents

One of NNN’s primary objectives, consistent with its policy of retaining sufficient cash for reserves and working capital purposes and maintaining its status as a REIT, is to distribute a substantial portion of its funds available from operations to its stockholders in the form of dividends. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common stockholders of $120,256,000, $110,107,000, and $92,989,000, respectively, or $1.50, $1.48 and $1.40 per share, respectively, of common stock.

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

2009 2008 2007

Ordinary dividends

$ 1.495182 99.6788% $ 1.480000 100.000% $ 1.397402 99.8144%

Qualified dividends

- - - - 0.000414 0.0296%

Capital gain

0.003051 0.2034% - - 0.002184 0.1560%

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

0.001767 0.1178% - - - -
$ 1.500000 100.000% $ 1.480000 100.000% $ 1.400000 100.0000%

In February 2010, NNN paid dividends to its common stockholders of $31,026,000, or $0.375 per share of common stock.

Holders of NNN’s preferred stock issuance are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions based on the stated rate and liquidation preference per annum. The following table outlines the issuance of NNN’s preferred stock:

Non Voting
Preferred Stock
Issuance

Shares
Outstanding
At December 31,
2009
Liquidation
Preference Per
Share
Fixed Annual
Cash
Distribution
(per share)

7.375% Series C (1)

3,680,000 25.00 1.84375

(1)

In October 2006, NNN issued 3,680,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. See Capital Resources – Debt and Equity Securities .”

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

Capital Resources

Generally, cash needs for property acquisitions, mortgages and notes receivable investments, debt payments, dividends, structured finance investments, capital expenditures, development and other investments have been funded by equity and debt offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties and, to a lesser extent, by internally generated funds. Cash needs for other items have been met from operations. If available, future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of NNN’s debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations.

38


Table of Contents

Debt

The following is a summary of NNN’s total outstanding debt as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 Percentage of
Total
2008 Percentage of
Total

Line of credit payable

$ - - $ 26,500 2.6%

Mortgages payable

25,290 2.6% 26,290 2.6%

Notes payable – convertible

343,380 34.8% 356,122 34.6%

Notes payable

618,676 62.6% 618,479 60.2%

Total outstanding debt

$ 987,346 100.0% $ 1,027,391 100.0%

Indebtedness. NNN expects to use indebtedness primarily for property acquisitions and development of single-tenant retail properties, either directly or through investment interests, and mortgages and notes receivable.

Line of Credit Payable. NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving Credit Facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $10,824,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009. In November 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 credit facility, replacing the former revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding, and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage, and (iv) investment limitations. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of these restrictive financial covenants, it could cause the indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be accelerated and may impair NNN’s access to the debt and equity markets and limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends to its common and preferred stockholders, each of which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operation.

Mortgages Payable. The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

Entered

Balance Interest
Rate
Maturity (3) Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(1)
Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
2009 2008

December 1999 (4)

$ 350 8.50 % December 2009 $ - $ - $ 49

December 2001 (2)

623 9.00 % April 2014 820 267 315

December 2001 (2)

698 9.00 % April 2019 1,247 392 418

December 2001 (2)

485 9.00 % April 2019 1,215 201 214

June 2002

21,000 6.90 % July 2012 24,505 19,170 19,477

February 2004 (2)

6,952 6.90 % January 2017 11,764 4,554 5,036

March 2005 (2)

1,015 8.14 % September 2016 1,341 706 781
$ 40,892 $ 25,290 $ 26,290

(1)

Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2009.

(2)

Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

(3)

Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

(4)

In December 2009, upon maturity NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance and the property was released from the mortgage lien. This was a self-amortizing mortgage.

39


Table of Contents

Notes Payable – Convertible .  Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Terms

2026
Notes (1)(2)(4)
2028
Notes (2)(5)(6)

Issue Date

September 2006 March 2008

Net Proceeds

$ 168,650 $ 228,576

Stated Interest Rate (8)

3.950% 5.125%

Debt Issuance Costs

$ 3,850 (3) $ 5,459 (7)

Earliest Conversion Date

September 2025 June 2027

Earliest Put Option Date

September 2011 June 2013

Maturity Date

September 2026 June 2028

Original Principal

$ 172,500 $ 234,035

Repurchases

(33,800 ) (11,000 )

Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2009

$ 138,700 $ 223,035

(1)

NNN repurchased $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 in March 2009, January 2009 and November 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $3,100, $3,894 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $607, $958 and $4,961, respectively.

(2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

(3)

Includes $48, $66 and $349 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 of the 2026 Notes, respectively.

(4)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.6750 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.9952 per share of common stock.

(5)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3459 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4156 per share of common stock.

(6)

NNN repurchased $2,500 and $8,500 in May 2009 and February 2009, respectively, for a purchase price of $2,049 and $6,539, respectively, resulting in a gain of $342 and $1,525, respectively.

(7)

Includes $48 and $171 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $2,500 and $8,500 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

(8)

With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

Notes Payable. Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Notes

Issue Date Principal Discount (3) Net Price Stated
Rate
Effective
Rate
(4)
Maturity
Date

2010 (1)

September 2000 $ 20,000 $ 126 $ 19,874 8.500% 8.595% September 2010

2012 (1)

June 2002 50,000 287 49,713 7.750% 7.833% June 2012

2014 (1)(2)(5)

June 2004 150,000 440 149,560 6.250% 5.910% June 2014

2015 (1)

November 2005 150,000 390 149,610 6.150% 6.185% December 2015

2017 (1)(6)

September 2007 250,000 877 249,123 6.875% 6.924% October 2017

(1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

(2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

(3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

(4)

Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

(5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

(6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

40


Table of Contents

Each series of notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. The notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the note and convertible note offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,459,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indentures, pursuant to which NNN’s notes and convertible notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios, and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

In March 2008, NNN repaid the 7.125% $100,000,000 notes that were due in March 2008.

Debt and Equity Securities

NNN has used, and expects to use in the future, issuances of debt and equity securities primarily to pay down its outstanding indebtedness and to finance investment acquisitions. NNN has maintained investment grade debt ratings from Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings on its senior, unsecured debt since 1998. In June 2008, NNN’s debt rating was upgraded by Moody’s Investor Service. In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) which was automatically effective and permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.

A description of NNN’s outstanding series of publicly held notes is found under “Debt – Notes Payable – Convertible” and “Debt – Notes Payable” above.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock . In October 2006, NNN issued 3,200,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $80,000,000. In addition, NNN issued an additional 480,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received gross proceeds of $12,000,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

41


Table of Contents

In January 2007, NNN used $44,540,000 of the net proceeds from the offering to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock; and the remainder of the net proceeds were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Common Stock Issuances. In March 2007, NNN issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $24.70 per share and received net proceeds of $118,020,000. Subsequently, in April 2007, NNN issued an additional 750,000 shares of common stock in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received net proceeds of $17,730,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $6,217,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In October 2007, NNN issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.94 per share and received net proceeds of $99,150,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $4,874,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. In October 2007, NNN used a portion of the net proceeds to repay the outstanding principal balance on its term note.

In October 2008, NNN issued 3,450,000 shares of common stock in a registered, underwritten public offering at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. NNN used the net proceeds to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility and to acquire Investment Properties.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement which was automatically effective, with the Commission for its DRIP, which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. NNN’s DRIP provides an economical and convenient way for current stockholders and other interested new investors to invest in NNN’s common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN’s DRIP for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Shares of common stock

3,766,452 2,146,640 2,645,257

Net proceeds

$ 67,354 $ 47,372 $ 62,980

The proceeds from the issuances were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness under NNN’s Credit Facility.

Mortgages and Notes Receivable .

Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008

Mortgages and notes receivable

$ 41,707 $ 55,495

Structured finance investments

- 4,514

Accrued interest receivable

269 387

Unamortized premium

- 84
41,976 60,480

Less loan origination fees, net

- (8 )
$ 41,976 $ 60,472

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate.

42


Table of Contents

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests .

In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, NNN adjusted carrying value of the Residuals to reflect such fair value at December 31, 2009. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation changed several valuation assumptions. The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

2009 2008

Discount rate

25% 25%

Average life equivalent CPR speeds range

14.5% to 20.7% CPR 31.7% to 39.4% CPR

Foreclosures:

Frequency curve default model

6% average rate 1.1% maximum rate

Loss severity of loans in foreclosure

20% 10%

Yield:

LIBOR

Forward 3-month curve Forward 3-month curve

Prime

Forward curve Forward curve

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Unrealized gains

$ - $ 2,009 $ -

Unrealized losses

1,640 - 326

Other than temporary valuation impairment

498 758 638

Business Combination .

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of its tenants, in June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000.

43


Table of Contents

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

NNN is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its variable rate Credit Facility and its fixed rate debt which is used to finance NNN’s development and acquisition activities, as well as for general corporate purposes. NNN’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, NNN borrows at both fixed and variable rates on its long-term debt. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had no outstanding derivatives.

The information in the table below summarizes NNN’s market risks associated with its debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The table presents principal payments and related interest rates by year for debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2009. NNN has a variable interest rate risk on its Credit Facility which had no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2009. The weighted average rate for the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 1.19%. The fair value of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $0 and $26,500,000, respectively. The table incorporates only those debt obligations that existed as of December 31, 2009; it does not consider those debt obligations or positions which could arise after this date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table below, the information presented therein has limited predictive value. As a result, NNN’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, NNN’s hedging strategies at that time and interest rates. If interest rates on NNN’s variable rate debt increased by one percent, NNN’s interest expense would have increased by one percent for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Fixed Rate Debt Obligations (dollars in thousands)

Mortgages Unsecured Debt (1)
Debt
Obligation
Weighted
Average

Interest Rate
Debt
Obligation
Effective
Interest Rate

2010

$ 1,022 7.19% $ 19,987 8.60%

2011

1,098 7.20% 134,421 5.84%

2012

19,290 6.92% 49,909 7.83%

2013

863 7.35% 208,960 7.19%

2014

880 7.27% 149,771 5.91%

Thereafter

2,137 7.36% 399,008 6.65%

Total

$ 25,290 7.01% $ 962,056 6.64%

Fair Value:

December 31, 2009

$ 25,290 $ 987,275

December 31, 2008

$ 26,290 $ 709,944

(1)

Includes NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, each net of unamortized discounts. NNN uses Bloomberg software to determine the fair value.

NNN is also exposed to market risks related to NNN’s Residuals. Factors that may impact the market value of the Residuals include delinquencies, loan losses, prepayment speeds and interest rates. The Residuals, which are reported at market value based upon an independent valuation, had a carrying value of $20,153,000 and $22,000,000 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Losses are considered other than temporary and reported as a valuation impairment in earnings from operations if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows that leads to a loss in value.

44


Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Miami, Florida

February 25, 2010

45


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Retail Property Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Miami, Florida

February 25, 2010

46


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

ASSETS

December 31,
2009
December 31,
2008

Real estate, Investment Portfolio:

Accounted for using the operating method, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

$ 2,329,827 $ 2,373,878

Accounted for using the direct financing method

31,317 31,240

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, held for sale

72,423 85,122

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

4,703 4,927

Mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable, net of allowance

41,976 60,472

Commercial mortgage residual interests

20,153 22,000

Cash and cash equivalents

15,225 2,626

Receivables, net of allowance of $583 and $4,003, respectively

1,946 3,612

Accrued rental income, net of allowance of $2,875 and $4,144, respectively

25,745 23,972

Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $10,008 and $12,852, respectively

13,884 11,342

Other assets

33,763 30,280

Total assets

$ 2,590,962 $ 2,649,471

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Line of credit payable

$ - $ 26,500

Mortgages payable

25,290 26,290

Notes payable – convertible, net of unamortized discount of $18,355 and $25,413, respectively

343,380 356,122

Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $1,324 and $1,521, respectively

618,676 618,479

Accrued interest payable

7,471 7,608

Other liabilities

29,283 45,526

Total liabilities

1,024,100 1,080,525

Commitments and contingencies (Note 26)

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 15,000,000 shares

Series C, 3,680,000 depositary shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $25 per share

92,000 92,000

Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 190,000,000 shares; 82,427,560 and 78,340,428 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

825 784

Excess stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 205,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

- -

Capital in excess of par value

1,408,491 1,337,018

Retained earnings

62,413 134,644

Accumulated other comprehensive income

511 2,414

Total stockholders’ equity of National Retail Properties, Inc.

1,564,240 1,566,860

Noncontrolling interests

2,622 2,086

Total equity

1,566,862 1,568,946

Total liabilities and equity

$ 2,590,962 $ 2,649,471

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

47


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007

Revenues:

Rental income from operating leases

$ 210,215 $ 206,477 $ 159,065

Earned income from direct financing leases

3,070 3,103 3,221

Percentage rent

1,340 1,104 1,383

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

8,387 7,012 5,591

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

4,535 5,804 5,268

Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests

4,252 4,636 4,882
231,799 228,136 179,410

Disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio:

Gross proceeds

953 4,900 1,750

Costs

(916 ) (4,879 ) (1,418 )

Gain

37 21 332

Retail operations:

Revenues

15,595 - -

Operating expenses

(15,176 ) - -

Net

419 - -

Operating expenses:

General and administrative

21,776 24,878 23,565

Real estate

13,684 10,007 7,805

Depreciation and amortization

46,769 44,181 31,340

Impairment – real estate

28,114 1,234 416

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

498 758 638

Restructuring costs

731 - -
111,572 81,058 63,764

Earnings from operations

120,683 147,099 115,978

Other expenses (revenues):

Interest and other income

(1,375 ) (3,748 ) (4,751 )

Interest expense

62,151 63,964 51,846

Loss on interest rate hedge

- 804 -
60,776 61,020 47,095

Earnings from continuing operations before income tax benefit, equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate, loss on note receivable foreclosure and gain on extinguishment of debt

59,907 86,079 68,883

Income tax benefit

1,126 7,178 8,300

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate

421 364 49

Loss on note receivable foreclosure

(7,196 ) - -

Gain on extinguishment of debt

3,432 4,961 -

Earnings from continuing operations

57,690 98,582 77,232

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 18):

Real estate, Investment Portfolio

260 12,112 68,976

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, net of income tax expense

(1,551 ) 9,277 9,534
(1,291 ) 21,389 78,510

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

48


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

$ 56,399 $ 119,971 $ 155,742

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests:

Continuing operations

(1,542 ) 109 156

Discontinued operations

(47 ) (2,927 ) (1,299 )
(1,589 ) (2,818 ) (1,143 )

Net earnings attributable to National Retail Properties, Inc.

54,810 117,153 154,599

Other comprehensive income

(1,903 ) 1,688 (3,622 )

Total comprehensive income

$ 52,907 $ 118,841 $ 150,977

Net earnings attributable to National Retail Properties, Inc.

$ 54,810 $ 117,153 $ 154,599

Series C preferred stock dividends

(6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 )

Net earnings attributable to common stockholders

$ 48,025 $ 110,368 $ 147,814

Net earnings per share of common stock:

Basic:

Continuing operations

$ 0.62 $ 1.23 $ 1.06

Discontinued operations

(0.02 ) 0.25 1.17

Net earnings

$ 0.60 $ 1.48 $ 2.23

Diluted:

Continuing operations

$ 0.61 $ 1.23 $ 1.06

Discontinued operations

(0.01 ) 0.25 1.16

Net earnings

$ 0.60 $ 1.48 $ 2.22

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

Basic

79,846,258 74,249,137 66,152,437

Diluted

79,953,499 74,344,231 66,263,980

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

49


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Series A
Preferred
Stock
Series C
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity

Balances at December 31, 2006

$ 44,540 $ 92,000 $ 598 $ 888,085 $ 79,558 $ 4,698 $ 1,109,479 $ 1,619 $ 1,111,098

Net earnings

- - - - 154,599 - 154,599 1,143 155,742

Dividends declared and paid:

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

- - - - (6,785 ) - (6,785 ) - (6,785 )

$1.40 per share of common stock

- - 6 13,947 (92,989 ) - (79,036 ) - (79,036 )

Redemption of 1,781,589 shares of Series A preferred stock

(44,540 ) - - - - - (44,540 ) - (44,540 )

Issuance of common stock:

9,861,323 shares

- - 98 247,643 - - 247,741 - 247,741

2,054,805 shares – discounted stock purchase program

- - 21 49,006 - - 49,027 - 49,027

Issuance of 198,119 shares of restricted common stock

- - 2 (2 ) - - - - -

Stock issuance costs

- - - (11,206 ) - - (11,206 ) - (11,206 )

Amortization of deferred compensation

- - - 2,091 - - 2,091 - 2,091

Interest rate hedge termination

- - - - - (3,119 ) (3,119 ) - (3,119 )

Amortization of interest rate hedges

- - - - - (309 ) (309 ) - (309 )

Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests

- - - - - (427 ) (427 ) 101 (326 )

Stock value adjustment

- - - - - 132 132 - 132

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

- - - - - - - 155 155

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

- - - - - - - (62 ) (62 )

Balances at December 31, 2007

$ - $ 92,000 $ 725 $ 1,189,564 $ 134,383 $ 975 $ 1,417,647 $ 2,956 $ 1,420,603

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

50


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Series A
Preferred
Stock
Series C
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity

Balances at December 31, 2007

$ - $ 92,000 $ 725 $ 1,189,564 $ 134,383 $ 975 $ 1,417,647 $ 2,956 $ 1,420,603

Net earnings

- - - - 117,153 - 117,153 2,818 119,971

Dividends declared and paid:

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

- - - - (6,785 ) - (6,785 ) - (6,785 )

$1.48 per share of common stock

- - 4 8,472 (110,107 ) - (101,631 ) - (101,631 )

Issuance of common stock:

3,523,285 shares

- - 35 80,633 - - 80,668 - 80,668

1,753,201 shares – discounted stock purchase program

- - 18 38,878 - - 38,896 - 38,896

Issuance of 217,397 shares of restricted common stock

- - 2 (2 ) - - - - -

Stock issuance costs

- - - (3,582 ) - - (3,582 ) - (3,582 )

Equity component of convertible debt

- - - 20,467 - - 20,467 - 20,467

Amortization of deferred compensation

- - - 2,588 - - 2,588 - 2,588

Interest rate hedge termination

- - - - - (162 ) (162 ) - (162 )

Amortization of interest rate hedges

- - - - - (109 ) (109 ) - (109 )

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

- - - - - 1,760 1,760 249 2,009

Stock value adjustment

- - - - - (50 ) (50 ) - (50 )

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

- - - - - - - 41 41

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

- - - - - - (5,483 ) (5,483 )

Other

- - - - - - - 1,505 1,505

Balances at December 31, 2008

$ - $ 92,000 $ 784 $ 1,337,018 $ 134,644 $ 2,414 $ 1,566,860 $ 2,086 $ 1,568,946

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

51


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Series A
Preferred
Stock
Series C
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity

Balances at December 31, 2008

$ - $ 92,000 $ 784 $ 1,337,018 $ 134,644 $ 2,414 $ 1,566,860 $ 2,086 $ 1,568,946

Net earnings

- - - - 54,810 - 54,810 1,589 56,399

Dividends declared and paid:

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

- - - - (6,785 ) - (6,785 ) - (6,785 )

$1.50 per share of common stock

- - 1 1,797 (120,256 ) - (118,458 ) - (118,458 )

Issuance of common stock:

99,738 shares

- - 1 1,435 - - 1,436 - 1,436

3,664,182 shares – discounted stock purchase program

- - 36 65,519 - - 65,555 - 65,555

Issuance of 262,546 shares of restricted common stock

- - 3 (3 ) - - - - -

Stock issuance costs

- - - (113 ) - - (113 ) - (113 )

Equity component of extinguishment of convertible debt

- - - (795 ) - - (795 ) - (795 )

Amortization of deferred compensation

- - - 3,443 - - 3,443 - 3,443

Amortization of interest rate hedges

- - - - - (159 ) (159 ) - (159 )

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

- - - - - (1,744 ) (1,744 ) 104 (1,640 )

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

- - - - - - - 152 152

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

- - - - - - - (552 ) (552 )

Other

- - - 190 - - 190 (757 ) (567 )

Balances at December 31, 2009

$ - $ 92,000 $ 825 $ 1,408,491 $ 62,413 $ 511 $ 1,564,240 $ 2,622 $ 1,566,862

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

52


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007

Cash flows from operating activities:

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

$ 56,399 $ 119,971 $ 155,742

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

Stock compensation expense

4,172 3,299 2,604

Stock options expense – tax effect

190 - -

Depreciation and amortization

48,485 45,347 32,927

Impairment – real estate

34,514 5,660 1,970

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

498 758 638

Amortization of notes payable discount

6,006 5,670 2,724

Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges

(159 ) (162 ) (309 )

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

(421 ) (364 ) (49 )

Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates

607 439 30

Gain on disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

(2,392 ) (9,980 ) (56,625 )

Gain on extinguishment of debt

(3,432 ) (4,961 ) -

Loss on note receivable foreclosure

7,196 - -

Gain on disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

(595 ) (12,665 ) (12,133 )

Deferred income taxes

(16,649 ) (5,593 ) (4,590 )

Income tax valuation allowance

14,900 - -

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations:

Additions to real estate, Inventory Portfolio

(2,457 ) (33,745 ) (165,160 )

Proceeds from disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

6,276 128,785 160,173

Decrease in real estate leased to others using the direct financing method

1,378 1,195 2,130

Decrease (increase) in work in process

(786 ) 47 (4,217 )

Increase in mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable

(10 ) (217 ) (301 )

Decrease in receivables

941 243 3,924

Increase in commercial mortgage residual interests

(291 ) - -

Increase in accrued rental income

(2,061 ) (978 ) (2,631 )

Decrease (increase) in other assets

(172 ) 951 3,615

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable

(137 ) (3,635 ) 5,254

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

(2,930 ) (1,463 ) 4,510

Increase (decrease) in current tax liability

432 (1,143 ) (79 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

149,502 237,459 130,147

Cash flows from investing activities:

Proceeds from the disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

14,588 60,027 136,295

Additions to real estate, Investment Portfolio:

Accounted for using the operating method

(44,433 ) (352,618 ) (677,101 )

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

- (901 ) (4,156 )

Increase in mortgages and notes receivable

(959 ) (29,934 ) (44,888 )

Principal payments on mortgages and notes receivable

4,009 64,589 19,862

Cash received from commercial mortgage residual interests

- 3,591 6,208

Restricted cash

- - 36,587

Payment of lease costs

(451 ) (922 ) (2,912 )

Other

(817 ) (136 ) (6,612 )

Net cash used in investing activities

(28,063 ) (256,304 ) (536,717 )

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

53


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from line of credit payable

$ 132,400 $ 516,000 $ 662,300

Repayment of line of credit payable

(158,900 ) (619,300 ) (560,500 )

Repayment of mortgages payable

(1,000 ) (1,190 ) (8,412 )

Proceeds from notes payable – convertible

- 234,035 -

Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – debt component

(14,785 ) (18,420 ) -

Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – equity component

(795 ) (768 ) -

Repayment of notes payable – secured

- (12,000 ) (33,300 )

Proceeds from notes payable

- - 249,122

Repayment of notes payable

- (100,000 ) -

Payment of interest rate hedge

- - (3,228 )

Payment of debt costs

(6,275 ) (5,813 ) (2,453 )

Repayment of financing lease obligation

- - (26,007 )

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

68,060 127,328 310,208

Redemption of 1,781,589 shares of Series A preferred stock

- - (44,540 )

Payment of Series C preferred stock dividends

(6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 )

Payment of common stock dividends

(120,256 ) (110,107 ) (92,989 )

Noncontrolling interest distributions

(552 ) (5,483 ) (62 )

Noncontrolling interest contributions

152 41 155

Stock issuance costs

(104 ) (3,566 ) (11,115 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(108,840 ) (6,028 ) 432,394

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

12,599 (24,873 ) 25,824

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

2,626 27,499 1,675

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$ 15,225 $ 2,626 $ 27,499

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

54


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
2009 2008 2007

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Interest paid, net of amount capitalized

$ 61,475 $ 69,395 $ 51,824

Taxes paid (received)

$ (63 ) $ 3,441 $ 1,375

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

Issued 262,546, 225,517 and 211,118 shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

$ 4,290 $ 3,796 $ 4,323

Issued 6,594, 12,766 and 7,750 shares of common stock in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, to directors pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

$ 118 $ 262 $ 182

Issued 41,604, 26,879 and 16,346 shares of common stock in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s Deferred Director Fee Plan

$ 611 $ 449 $ 331

Surrender of 2,520 and 8,600 shares of restricted common stock in 2008 and 2007, respectively

$ - $ 58 $ 182

Change in other comprehensive income

$ (1,903 ) $ 1,439 $ (3,723 )

Change in lease classification (direct financing lease to operating lease)

$ - $ 300 $ -

Transfer of real estate from Inventory Portfolio to Investment Portfolio

$ 16,058 $ 29,948 $ 14,845

Note and mortgage receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions

$ 1,550 $ 24,245 $ 9,747

Interest rate hedge

$ - $ - $ 109

Real estate acquired in connection with note receivable foreclosure

$ 4,240 $ 2,497 $ -

Assets received in note receivable foreclosure

$ 5,527 $ - $ -

Note receivable foreclosures

$ (17,013 ) $ - $ -

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

55


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Organization and Nature of Business – National Retail Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries. These taxable subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments) on the consolidated balance sheets and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties (including 12 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate gross leasable area of 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. In addition, as of December 31, 2009, NNN’s Investment Assets included $41,976,000 in mortgages, notes and interest receivable (including structured finance investments) and $20,153,000 in commercial mortgage residual interests. The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). Inventory Assets typically consist of two types of properties, property for development and improved properties. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 19 Inventory Properties.

Principles of Consolidation – NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of each of the respective majority owned and controlled affiliates, including transactions whereby NNN has been determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance included in Consolidation. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated. NNN applies the equity method of accounting to investments in partnerships and joint ventures that are not subject to control by NNN due to the significance of rights held by other parties.

The TRS develops real estate through various joint venture development affiliate agreements. NNN consolidates the joint venture development entities listed in the table below based upon either NNN being the primary beneficiary of the respective variable interest entity or NNN having a controlling interest over the respective entity. NNN eliminates significant intercompany

56


Table of Contents

balances and transactions and records a noncontrolling interest for its other partners’ ownership percentage. The following table summarizes each of the investments as of December 31, 2009:

Date of Agreement

Entity Name

TRS’
Ownership %

November 2002

WG Grand Prairie TX, LLC 60%

February 2003

Gator Pearson, LLC 50%

February 2006

CNLRS BEP, L.P. 50%

February 2006

CNLRS Rockwall, L.P. 50%

September 2006

NNN Harrison Crossing, L.P. 50%

September 2006

CNLRS RGI Bonita Springs, LLC 50%

In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”) with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, LP.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease – In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of the relative fair values of these assets. The as-if-vacant fair value of a property is provided to management by a qualified appraiser.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off.

The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.

57


Table of Contents

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method – Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rentals vary during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method – Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate , the TRS classifies its real estate held for sale as discontinued operations for each property in which rental revenues are generated.

Impairment – Real Estate – Based upon events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market condition, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive price. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Real Estate Dispositions – When real estate is disposed of, the related cost, accumulated depreciation or amortization and any accrued rental income for operating leases and the net investment for direct financing leases are removed from the accounts and gains and losses from the dispositions are reflected in income. Gains from the disposition of real estate are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate Sales , provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and any subsequent involvement by NNN with the real estate sold are met. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are cancelled and NNN no longer has a continuing obligation to provide services to the former tenants.

58


Table of Contents

Valuation of Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest – The allowance related to the mortgages, notes and accrued interest is NNN’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. The allowance is determined on an individual note basis in reviewing any payment past due for over 90 days. Any outstanding amounts are written off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted.

Investment in an Unconsolidated Affiliate – NNN accounts for its investment in an unconsolidated affiliate under the equity method of accounting.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value – Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of 78.9 percent equity interest of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – NNN considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

Cash accounts maintained on behalf of NNN in demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds may exceed federally insured levels; however, NNN has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Valuation of Receivables – NNN estimates of the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. NNN analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.

Goodwill – Goodwill arises from business combinations and represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net fair value amounts that were assigned to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Goodwill , NNN performs impairment testing on goodwill annually. The impairment test compares the fair value of goodwill to its carrying amount.

Debt Costs – Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s $400,000,000 line of credit and mortgages payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Debt costs incurred in connection with the issuance of NNN’s notes payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective debt obligation using the effective interest method.

Revenue Recognition – Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction

59


Table of Contents

commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Earnings Per Share – Earnings per share have been computed pursuant to the FASB guidance included in Earnings Per Share . Effective January 1, 2009, the guidance requires classification of the Company’s unvested restricted share units which contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, as participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Basic and Diluted Earnings:

Net earnings attributable to NNN

$ 54,810 $ 117,153 $ 154,599

Less: Series C preferred stock dividends

(6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 )

Net earnings available to NNN’s common stockholders

48,025 110,368 147,814

Less: Earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares

(290 ) (485 ) (622 )

Net earnings used in basic earnings per share

47,735 109,883 147,192

Reallocated undistributed income (loss)

(1 ) - 1

Net earnings used in diluted earnings per share

$ 47,734 $ 109,883 $ 147,193

Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

Weighted average number of shares outstanding

80,486,215 74,732,844 66,519,519

Less: Unvested restricted stock

(639,957 ) (483,707 ) (367,082 )

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share

79,846,258 74,249,137 66,152,437

Effects of dilutive securities:

Common stock options

9,037 35,900 69,040

Directors’ deferred fee plan

98,204 59,194 42,503

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share

79,953,499 74,344,231 66,263,980

The potential dilutive shares related to convertible notes payable were not included in computing earnings per common share because their effects would be antidilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation – On January 1, 2006, NNN adopted the FASB guidance included in Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees , under the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted after the adoption of this standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that are outstanding as of that date. In accordance with the FASB guidance, NNN estimates the fair value of restricted stock and stock option grants at the date of grant and amortizes those amounts into expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the appropriate vesting period.

Income Taxes – NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

60


Table of Contents

NNN and its taxable REIT subsidiaries have made timely TRS elections pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A taxable REIT subsidiary is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of NNN which occur within its TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 17). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and to OAMI’s built-in-gain tax liability.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as required by the FASB guidance included in Income Taxes . Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences based on estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Fair Value Measurement – NNN’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

New Accounting Pronouncements – In January 2009, FASB issued new guidance on impairments included in Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. The new guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2008. Retroactive application was not permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance for the accounting of noncontrolling interests. The new guidance requires noncontrolling interests, previously called minority interest, to be presented as a component of equity. In addition, the guidance requires disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of earnings of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interests. The guidance was applied prospectively with the exception of presentation and disclosure requirements, which were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

61


Table of Contents

In April 2009, FASB issued additional application guidance and enhancements to disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The new guidance enhances consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. The guidance also provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent. The guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2009, FASB issued revised guidance on the recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or result of operations.

In May 2009, FASB issued new guidance for accounting for subsequent events. The guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The guidance provides, among other things, that companies should recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. The new guidance was effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or result of operations.

In June 2009, FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the “Codification”). The Codification reorganized existing U.S. accounting and reporting standards issued by the FASB and other related private sector standard setters into a single source of authoritative accounting principles arranged by topic. The Codification supersedes all existing U.S. accounting standards; all other accounting literature not included in the Codification (other than the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) guidance for publicly-traded companies) is considered non-authoritative. The Codification was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification changed the Company’s references to accounting standards under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) but did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, FASB issued guidance on the accounting for the transfers of financial assets. The new guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. The new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim and annual periods thereafter. The adoption of the standard will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities. The revised guidance reflects the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity. The guidance also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach that is primarily qualitative. The new guidance requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity as well as additional disclosures. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the standard will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

62


Table of Contents

In August 2009, FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for the fair value measurement of liabilities. The new guidance provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the approved techniques. The new guidance clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption will have on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards with change in Accounting Principles – Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The new guidance requires the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) was separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. The debt component was recorded based upon the estimated fair value of non-convertible debt with similar terms. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the period during which the debt is outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. This guidance required retrospective application, the effects of adopting such, has been reflected in all periods presented.

Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities, which also required retrospective application. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Use of Estimates – Management of NNN has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant estimates include provision for impairment and allowances for certain assets, accruals, useful lives of assets and capitalization of costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassification – Certain items in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009. These reclassifications had no effect on stockholders’ equity or net earnings.

Note 2 – Real Estate – Investment Portfolio:

Leases – As of December 31, 2009, 984 of the Investment Property leases had been classified as operating leases, and 23 leases had been classified as direct financing leases. For the Investment Property leases classified as direct financing leases, the building portions of the property leases are accounted for as direct financing leases while the land portions of seven of these leases are accounted for as operating leases. Substantially all leases have initial terms of 10 to 20 years (expiring between 2010 and 2029) and provide for minimum rentals. In addition, the leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. Generally, the tenant is also required to pay all property taxes and assessments, substantially maintain the interior and exterior of the building and carry property and liability insurance coverage. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses of the property. As of December 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 12 years. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide the

63


Table of Contents

tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method – Real estate subject to operating leases consisted of the following as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008

Land and improvements

$ 1,054,888 $ 1,063,419

Buildings and improvements

1,451,608 1,413,438

Leasehold interests

1,290 2,532
2,507,786 2,479,389

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

(183,956 ) (146,296 )
2,323,830 2,333,093

Work in progress

5,997 40,785
$ 2,329,827 $ 2,373,878

Some leases provide for scheduled rent increases throughout the lease term. Such amounts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN recognized collectively in continuing and discontinued operations, $2,102,000, $1,020,000, and $2,672,000, respectively, of such income. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the balance of accrued rental income, net of allowances of $2,875,000 and $4,144,000, respectively, was $25,745,000 and $23,972,000, respectively.

In connection with the development of two Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $14,651,000. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had funded $12,261,000 of this commitment, with $2,390,000 remaining to be funded.

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancellable operating leases at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

2010

$ 202,038

2011

198,594

2012

193,894

2013

185,630

2014

176,374

Thereafter

1,574,516
$ 2,531,046

Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the CPI or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Direct Financing Method – The following lists the components of net investment in direct financing leases at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008

Minimum lease payments to be received

$ 42,244 $ 43,275

Estimated unguaranteed residual values

12,297 11,755

Less unearned income

(23,224 ) (23,790 )

Net investment in direct financing leases

$ 31,317 $ 31,240

64


Table of Contents

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on direct financing leases held for investment at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

2010

$ 4,545

2011

4,531

2012

4,558

2013

4,508

2014

3,750

Thereafter

20,352
$ 42,244

The above table does not include future minimum lease payments for renewal periods, potential variable CPI rent increases or contingent rental payments that may become due in future periods (See Real Estate – Accounted for Using the Operating Method).

Note 3 – Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio:

As of December 31, 2009, the TRS owned 19 Inventory Properties: 13 completed inventory and six land parcels. As of December 31, 2008, the TRS owned 32 Inventory Properties: 24 completed inventory, one under construction and seven land parcels. The real estate Inventory Portfolio consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008

Inventory:

Land

$ 19,732 $ 20,238

Building

47,684 47,925
67,416 68,163

Construction projects:

Land

17,719 19,031

Work in process

(363 ) 1,469
17,356 20,500

Less impairment

(12,349 ) (3,541 )
$ 72,423 $ 85,122

The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized on the disposition of Inventory Properties included in continuing and discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007
# of
Properties
Gain # of
Properties
Gain # of
Properties
Gain

Continuing operations

2 $ 37 1 $ 21 2 $ 332

Noncontrolling interest

(14 ) (10 ) -

Total continuing operations attributable to NNN

23 11 332

Discontinued operations

2 527 24 12,315 69 10,957

Intersegment eliminations

31 329 844

Noncontrolling interest

- (3,297 ) (1,120 )

Total discontinued operations attributable to NNN

558 9,347 10,681
4 $ 581 25 $ 9,358 71 $ 11,013

65


Table of Contents

Note 4 – Impairments – Real Estate:

Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive price. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, NNN recognized the following real estate impairments for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Continuing operations

$ 28,114 $ 1,234 $ 416

Discontinued operations

6,400 4,426 1,554
$ 34,514 $ 5,660 $ 1,970

The valuation of impaired assets is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis, income capitalization, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. NNN may consider a single valuation technique or multiple valuation techniques, as appropriate, when measuring the fair value of its real estate.

The following table presents information about NNN’s impaired assets that were measured at fair value. The table indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by NNN to determine the fair vale on a nonrecurring basis of such assets (dollars in thousands):

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Total
Losses

Investment Portfolio

$ - $ 8,203 $ 18,610 $ 26,813 $ 25,706

Inventory Portfolio

- 45,369 - 45,369 8,808
$ - $ 53,572 $ 18,610 $ 72,182 $ 34,514

The Investment Portfolio is substantially comprised of assets held for use. NNN recorded an impairment charge related to 18 Investment Properties totaling $25,706,000, during the year ended December 31, 2009. The Inventory Portfolio is reported at lower of cost or fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded an impairment charge related to seven Inventory Properties totaling $8,808,000.

Note 5 – Business Combinations:

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of NNN’s tenants, in June of 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000.

66


Table of Contents

Note 6 – Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable:

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008

Mortgages and notes receivable

$ 41,707 $ 55,495

Structured finance investments

- 4,514

Accrued interest receivables

269 387

Unamortized premium

- 84
41,976 60,480

Less loan origination fees, net

- (8 )
$ 41,976 $ 60,472

Note 7 – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests:

OAMI holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven securitizations. The following table summarizes the investment interests in each of the transactions:

Investment Interest

Securitization

Company (1) OAMI (2) 3 rd Party

BYL 99-1

- 59.0% 41.0%

CCMH I, LLC

42.7% 57.3% -

CCMH II, LLC

44.0% 56.0% -

CCMH III, LLC

36.7% 63.3% -

CCMH IV, LLC

38.3% 61.7% -

CCMH V, LLC

38.4% 61.6% -

CCMH VI, LLC

- 100.0% -

(1) NNN owned these investment interests prior to its acquisition of the equity interest in OAMI.

(2) NNN owns 78.9 percent of OAMI’s investment interest.

Each of the Residuals is recorded at fair value based upon an independent valuation. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation changed several valuation assumptions during the year: prepayment speeds, default curves and loss severity.

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Unrealized gains

$ - $ 2,009 $ -

Unrealized losses

1,640 - 326

Other than temporary valuation impairment

498 758 638

67


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

2009 2008

Discount rate

25% 25%

Average life equivalent CPR speeds range

14.5% to 20.7% CPR 31.7% to 39.4% CPR

Foreclosures:

Frequency curve default model

6% average rate 1.1% maximum rate

Loss severity of loans in foreclosure

20% 10%

Yield:

LIBOR

Forward 3-month curve Forward 3-month curve

Prime

Forward curve Forward curve

The following table shows the effects on the key assumptions affecting the fair value of the Residuals at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

Residuals

Carrying amount of retained interests

$ 20,153

Discount rate assumption:

Fair value at 27% discount rate

$ 19,474

Fair value at 30% discount rate

$ 18,523

Prepayment speed assumption:

Fair value of 1% increases above the CPR Index

$ 20,079

Fair value of 2% increases above the CPR Index

$ 20,065

Expected credit losses:

Fair value 2% adverse change

$ 19,748

Fair value 3% adverse change

$ 19,576

Yield Assumptions:

Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 25 basis points

$ 19,828

Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 50 basis points

$ 20,993

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation of a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Note 8 – Line of Credit Payable:

NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving credit facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $10,824,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009. On November 3, 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 revolving credit facility, replacing the existing revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding, and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

68


Table of Contents

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) maximum leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage and (iv) investment and dividend limitations. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

Note 9 – Mortgages Payable:

The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

Entered

Balance Interest
Rate
Maturity (3) Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(1)
Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
2009 2008

December 1999 (4)

$ 350 8.50% December 2009 $ - $ - $ 49

December 2001 (2)

623 9.00% April 2014 820 267 315

December 2001 (2)

698 9.00% April 2019 1,247 392 418

December 2001 (2)

485 9.00% April 2019 1,215 201 214

June 2002

21,000 6.90% July 2012 24,505 19,170 19,477

February 2004 (2)

6,952 6.90% January 2017 11,764 4,554 5,036

March 2005 (2)

1,015 8.14% September 2016 1,341 706 781
$ 40,892 $ 25,290 $ 26,290

(1)

Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2009.

(2)

Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

(3)

Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

(4)

In December 2009, upon maturity NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance and the property was released from the mortgage lien. This was a self-amortizing mortgage.

The following is a schedule of the annual maturities of NNN’s mortgages payable at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

2010

$ 1,022

2011

1,098

2012

19,290

2013

863

2014

880

Thereafter

2,137
$ 25,290

69


Table of Contents

Note 10 – Notes Payable – Convertible :

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Terms

2026
Notes (1)(2)(4)
2028
Notes (2)(5)(6)

Issue Date

September 2006 March 2008

Net Proceeds

$ 168,650 $ 228,576

Stated Interest Rate (8)

3.950% 5.125%

Debt Issuance Costs

$ 3,850 (3) $ 5,457

Earliest Conversion Date

September 2025 June 2027

Earliest Put Option Date

September 2011 June 2013

Maturity Date

September 2026 June 2028

Original Principal

$ 172,500 $ 234,035

Repurchases

(33,800 ) (11,000 )

Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2009

$ 138,700 $ 223,035

(1)

NNN repurchased $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 in March 2009, January 2009 and November 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $3,100, $3,894 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $607, $958 and $4,961, respectively.

(2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

(3)

Includes $48, $66 and $349 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 of the 2026 Notes, respectively.

(4)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.6750 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.9952 per share of common stock.

(5)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3459 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4156 per share of common stock.

(6)

NNN repurchased $2,500 and $8,500 in May 2009 and February 2009, respectively, for a purchase price of $2,049 and $6,539, respectively, resulting in a gain of $342 and $1,525, respectively.

(7)

Includes $48 and $171 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $2,500 and $8,500 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

(8)

With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date and (ii) the make whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

70


Table of Contents

Note 11 – Notes Payable :

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands).

Notes

Issue Date

Principal Discount (3) Net
Price
Stated
Rate
Effective
Rate
(4)

Maturity

Date

2010 (1)

September 2000 $ 20,000 $ 126 $ 19,874 8.500% 8.595% September 2010

2012 (1)

June 2002 50,000 287 49,713 7.750% 7.833% June 2012

2014 (1)(2)(5)

June 2004 150,000 440 149,560 6.250% 5.910% June 2014

2015 (1)

November 2005 150,000 390 149,610 6.150% 6.185% December 2015

2017 (1)(6)

September 2007 250,000 877 249,123 6.875% 6.924% October 2017

(1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

(2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

(3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

(4)

Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

(5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

(6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of the notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. Each of the notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the debt offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,459,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

Note 12 – Preferred Stock :

The following table outlines each issuance of NNN’s preferred stock (dollars in thousands):

Non-Voting Preferred Stock Issuance

Shares
Outstanding
At
December 31,
2009
Liquidation
Preference
(per share)
Fixed Annual
Cash
Distribution
(per share)

9% Series A

- $ 25.00 $ 2.25000

7.375% Series C Redeemable Depositary Shares

3,680,000 25.00 1.84375

9% Non-Voting Series A Preferred Stock. In December 2001, NNN issued 1,999,974 shares of 9% Non-Voting Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”). Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the board of directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions at a rate of nine percent of the $25.00 liquidation

71


Table of Contents

preference per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $2.25 per share). The Series A Preferred Stock ranked senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN.

In January 2007, NNN redeemed all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions through the redemption date of $0.20625 per share.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. In October 2006, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,200,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $80,000,000. In addition, NNN issued an additional 480,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received gross proceeds of $12,000,000. In connection with this offering NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

Note 13 – Common Stock :

In March 2007, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $24.70 per share and received net proceeds of $118,020,000. Subsequently, in April 2007, NNN issued an additional 750,000 shares of common stock in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received net proceeds of $17,730,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $6,217,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.

In October 2007, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.94 per share and received net proceeds of $99,150,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $4,874,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In October 2008, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,450,000 shares (including 450,000 shares in connection with the underwriters’ over allotment) of common stock at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

72


Table of Contents

In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Shares of common stock

3,766,452 2,146,640 2,645,257

Net proceeds

$ 67,354 $ 47,372 $ 62,980

Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plan :

Effective January 1, 1998, NNN adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering substantially all of the employees of NNN. The Retirement Plan permits participants to defer up to a maximum of 60 percent of their compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan, subject to limits established by the Code. NNN matches 60 percent of the participants’ contributions up to a maximum of eight percent of a participant’s annual compensation. NNN’s contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 totaled $302,000, $385,000, and $428,000, respectively.

Note 15 – Dividends :

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of common stock dividends paid to stockholders for the years ended December 31:

2009 2008 2007

Ordinary dividends

$ 1.495182 $ 1.480000 $ 1.397402

Qualified dividends

- - 0.000414

Capital gain

0.003051 - 0.002184

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

0.001767 - -
$ 1.500000 $ 1.480000 $ 1.400000

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common shareholders of $120,256,000, $110,107,000 and $92,989,000, respectively, or $1.50, $1.48 and $1.40, respectively per share, respectively, of common stock.

On January 15, 2010, NNN declared a dividend of $0.375 per share, which is payable February 15, 2010 to its common stockholders of record as of January 29, 2010.

73


Table of Contents

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of preferred stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the year ended December 31:

Total Ordinary
Dividends
Qualified
Dividends
Capital Gain Unrecaptured
Section 1250
Gains

2009:

Series C

$ 1.843750 $ 1.837828 $ - $ 0.00375 $ 0.002172

2008:

Series C

1.843750 1.843750 - - -

2007:

Series A (1)

0.206250 0.205867 0.000061 0.000322 -

Series C

1.843750 1.840328 0.000546 0.002876 -

(1)

Shares of Series A are no longer outstanding.

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

Note 16 – Restructuring Costs :

During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000, related to the reduction of its workforce in January 2009.

Note 17 – Income Taxes :

In June 2006, the FASB issued guidance, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with FASB guidance included in Income Taxes . The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

NNN is subject to the provisions of the FASB guidance as of January 1, 2007, and has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. NNN believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. Additionally, NNN believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to the FASB guidance. In addition, NNN did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of the FASB guidance.

NNN has had no increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits for current or prior years since the date of adoption. Further, no interest or penalties have been included since no reserves were recorded and no significant increases or decreases are expected to occur within the next 12 months. When applicable, such interest and penalties will be recorded in non-operating expenses. The periods that remain open under federal statute are 2006 through 2009. NNN also files in many states with varying open years under statute.

NNN incurred a new deferred income tax item as a result of NNN taking over the operations of the 12 auto service businesses. See Note 5 – Business Combinations. The new deferred tax item is goodwill. The amount of the tax deductible goodwill is approximately $11,216,000. It is amortized for tax purposes using a straight-line method, over 15 years, beginning with the month incurred.

74


Table of Contents

For income tax purposes, NNN has taxable REIT subsidiaries in which certain real estate activities are conducted. Additionally, in May 2005, NNN acquired a 78.9 percent equity interest in OAMI, and has consolidated OAMI in its financial statements. OAMI, upon making its REIT election, has remaining tax liabilities relating to the built-in gain of its assets.

NNN treats some depreciation expense and certain other items differently for tax than for financial reporting purposes. The principal differences between NNN’s effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the statutory rates relate to state taxes and nondeductible expenses such as meals and entertainment expenses.

The components of the net income tax asset consist of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008

Temporary differences:

Built-in gain

$ (4,731 ) $ (5,195 )

Depreciation

(385 ) (723 )

Other

1,992 (332 )

Reserves

10,892 1,894

Goodwill

2,801 -

Excess interest expense carryforward

5,678 5,721

Net operating loss carryforward

4,484 2,717

Net deferred income tax asset

$ 20,731 $ 4,082

Current income tax asset

551 982

Subtotal: Income tax asset

21,282 5,064

Valuation allowance

(14,900 ) -

Income tax asset

$ 6,382 $ 5,064

In assessing the ability to realize a deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carryforwards were generated by NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2027. Based upon the level of historical taxable income, projections for future taxable income, and tax strategies available to NNN over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes, with the exception of certain impairments and losses, it is more likely than not that NNN will realize all of the benefits of these deductible differences that existed as of December 31, 2009. NNN believes it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain impairment charges and losses will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, NNN has provided a valuation allowance of $14,900,000 on the deferred tax assets relating to the impairments and losses. The income tax benefit consists of the following components for the years ended December 31 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Net earnings before income taxes

$ 53,930 $ 113,859 $ 151,338

Provision for income tax benefit (expense):

Current:

Federal

(419 ) (1,936 ) (1,120 )

State and local

(79 ) (364 ) (209 )

Deferred:

Federal

1,110 4,539 3,570

State and local

268 1,055 1,020

Total benefit for income taxes

880 3,294 3,261

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

$ 54,810 $ 117,153 $ 154,599

75


Table of Contents

Note 18 – Earnings from Discontinued Operations :

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN classified the revenues and expenses related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interests which expired, and (ii) all Investment Properties that were held for sale as of December 31, 2009, as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Investment Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Revenues:

Rental income from operating leases

$ 3,826 $ 4,513 $ 11,492

Earned income from direct financing leases

- 100 2,695

Percentage rent

- 25 189

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

182 176 479

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

121 434 437
4,129 5,248 15,292

Operating expenses:

General and administrative

4 (74 ) (42 )

Real estate

742 520 755

Depreciation and amortization

1,209 940 1,518

Impairments – real estate

4,306 1,730 710
6,261 3,116 2,941

Earnings (loss) before gain on disposition of real estate

(2,132 ) 2,132 12,351

Gain on disposition of real estate

2,392 9,980 56,625

Earnings from discontinued operations attributable to NNN

$ 260 $ 12,112 $ 68,976

76


Table of Contents

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – NNN has classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to (i) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues prior to disposition, and (ii) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues and were held for sale as of December 31, 2009. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2009 2008 2007

Revenues:

Rental income from operating leases

$ 4,975 $ 8,646 $ 7,971

Percentage rent

- 139 -

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

1,513 867 976

Interest and other from real estate transactions

141 561 224
6,629 10,213 9,171

Disposition of real estate:

Gross proceeds

5,402 151,713 164,338

Costs

(4,844 ) (139,069 ) (152,537 )

Gain

558 12,644 11,801

Operating expenses:

General and administrative

116 22 53

Real estate

2,169 1,468 1,511

Depreciation and amortization

323 226 68

Impairments – real estate

2,094 2,696 844
4,702 4,412 2,476

Other expenses (revenues):

Interest and other income

- (8 ) (5 )

Interest expense

3,790 5,291 3,928
3,790 5,283 3,923

Earnings (loss) before income tax expense

(1,305 ) 13,162 14,573

Income tax expense

246 3,885 5,039

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations including noncontrolling interests

(1,551 ) 9,277 9,534

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

(47 ) (2,927 ) (1,299 )

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to NNN

$ (1,598 ) $ 6,350 $ 8,235

Note 19 – Derivatives :

In accordance with the guidance on derivatives and hedging, NNN records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

NNN’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, NNN primarily uses treasury locks and interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges lock in the yield or price of a treasury security. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount. To date, such derivatives have been used to hedge the variable cash

77


Table of Contents

flows associated with floating rate debt and forecasted interest payments of a forecasted issuance of debt.

For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.

NNN discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is re-designated as a hedging instrument or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, NNN continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings or may choose to cash settle the derivative at that time.

In February 2008, NNN terminated its interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedge when terminated was a liability of $804,000, which NNN recorded as a loss on interest rate hedge.

In September 2007, NNN terminated two interest rate hedges with a combined notional amount of $100,000,000 that were hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedges when terminated was a liability of $3,260,000, of which $3,228,000 was deferred in other comprehensive income.

In June 2004, NNN terminated its forward-starting interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $94,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swaps when terminated was an asset of $4,148,000, which was deferred in other comprehensive income.

As of December 31, 2009, $549,000 remains in other comprehensive income related to the fair value of the interest rate hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN reclassed $159,000, $162,000 and $309,000, respectively, out of other comprehensive income as a reduction to interest expense. During 2010, NNN estimates that an additional $165,000 will be reclassified in interest expense. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on NNN’s long-term debt.

NNN does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes or currently have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges. NNN had no derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2009.

78


Table of Contents

Note 20 – Performance Incentive Plan :

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaces NNN’s previous Performance Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan allows NNN to award or grant to key employees, directors and persons performing consulting or advisory services for NNN or its affiliates, stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, Phantom Stock Awards, Performance Awards and Leveraged Stock Purchase Awards, each as defined in the 2007 Plan.

The following summarizes NNN’s stock-based compensation activity for each of the years ended December 31:

Number of Shares
2009 2008 2007

Outstanding, January 1

77,004 118,804 236,371

Options granted

- - -

Options exercised

(51,500 ) (28,000 ) (82,767 )

Options surrendered

(13,350 ) (13,800 ) (34,800 )

Outstanding, December 31

12,154 77,004 118,804

Exercisable, December 31

12,154 77,004 118,804

The following represents the weighted average option exercise price information for each of the years ended December 31:

2009 2008 2007

Outstanding, January 1

$ 14.00 $ 13.64 $ 14.92

Granted during the year

- - -

Exercised during the year

13.72 11.17 16.12

Outstanding, December 31

13.72 14.00 13.64

Exercisable, December 31

13.72 14.00 13.64

The following summarizes the outstanding options and the exercisable options at December 31, 2009:

Total

Outstanding options:

Number of shares

12,154

Weighted-average exercise price

$ 13.72

Weighted-average remaining contractual life in years

2.4

Exercisable options:

Number of shares

12,154

Weighted-average exercise price

$ 13.72

One-third of the option grant to each individual becomes exercisable at the end of each of the first three years of service following the date of the grant and the options’ maximum term is 10 years. At December 31, 2009, the intrinsic value of options outstanding was $117,000. All options outstanding at December 31, 2009, were exercisable. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN received proceeds totaling $707,000, $313,000 and $1,334,000, respectively, in connection with the exercise of options. NNN issued new common stock to satisfy share option exercises. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, was $240,000, $327,000 and $664,000, respectively.

79


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, NNN has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers, directors and key associates of NNN. The following summarizes the activity for the year ended December 31, 2009, of such grants.

Number
of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Share Price

Non-vested restricted shares, January 1

508,840 $ 18.24

Restricted shares granted

262,546 16.34

Restricted shares vested

(103,376 ) 21.77

Restricted shares forfeited

-

Non-vested restricted shares, December 31

668,010 $ 16.95

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN cancelled 2,520 and 8,600 forfeited shares, respectively, of restricted stock. No shares were cancelled in 2009.

Compensation expense for the restricted stock which is not tied to performance goals is determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant, assuming a 1.3% forfeiture rate, and is recognized as the greater of the amount amortized over a straight lined basis or the amount vested over the vesting periods. Vesting periods for officers and key associates of NNN range from four to seven years and generally vest yearly on a straight line basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, NNN granted 79,000 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $12.94 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon the fair value of the grant calculated by a third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate of 4.80%, (ii) a dividend rate of 5.30%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) volatility of 17.50%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The term is assumed to be the vesting date for each tranche. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2012.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN granted 81,330 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $8.00 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon fair market value of the grant calculated by a third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free rate of 3.48%, (ii) a dividend rate of 6.50%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) a volatility of 19.89%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2013.

The following summarizes other grants made during the year ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to the 2007 Plan.

Shares Weighted
Average
Share Price

Other share grants under the 2007 Plan:

Directors’ fees

6,594 $ 17.89

Deferred Directors’ fees

41,604 17.95
48,198 $ 17.94

Shares available under the 2007 Plan for grant, end of period

5,272,513

The total compensation cost for share-based payments for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, totaled $4,172,000, $3,341,000 and $2,583,000, respectively, of such

80


Table of Contents

compensation expense. At December 31, 2009, NNN had $7,149,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the 2007 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years.

Note 21 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments :

NNN believes the carrying value of its Credit Facility approximates fair value based upon its nature, terms and variable interest rate. NNN believes that the carrying value of its cash and cash equivalents, mortgages, notes and other receivables, mortgages payable and other liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximate fair value based upon current market prices of similar issues. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying value and fair value of NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, collectively, was $987,275,000 and $709,944,000, respectively, based upon the quoted market price.

Note 22 – Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) :

The following table outlines NNN’s quarterly financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

2009

First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter

Revenues as originally reported

$ 57,963 $ 58,681 $ 57,035 $ 57,750

Reclassified to discontinued operations

367 (297 ) 301 -

Adjusted revenue

$ 58,330 $ 58,384 $ 57,336 $ 57,750

Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN’s stockholders

$ 26,804 $ 26,954 $ 22,443 $ (21,391 )

Net earnings (loss) per share (1) :

Basic

$ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ 0.26 $ (0.28 )

Diluted

0.32 0.32 0.26 (0.28 )

2008

Revenues as originally reported

$ 55,200 $ 57,026 $ 58,573 $ 57,244

Reclassified to discontinued operations

(878 ) (81 ) 841 210

Adjusted revenue

$ 54,322 $ 56,945 $ 59,414 $ 57,454

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

$ 32,239 $ 29,266 $ 28,766 $ 26,882

Net earnings per share (1) :

Basic

$ 0.42 $ 0.38 $ 0.37 $ 0.32

Diluted

0.42 0.38 0.37 0.32

(1)    Calculated independently for each period and consequently, the sum of the quarters may differ from the annual amount.

81


Table of Contents

Note 23 – Segment Information:

NNN has identified two primary financial segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following tables represent the segment data and reconciliation to NNN’s consolidated totals for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

2009

Investment
Assets
Inventory
Assets
Eliminations
(Intercompany)
Consolidated
Totals

External revenues

$ 224,083 $ 193 $ - $ 224,276

Intersegment revenues

3,035 1,042 (4,077 ) -

Interest revenue

4,615 31 - 4,646

Interest revenue on Residuals

4,252 - - 4,252

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

- 5 32 37

Retail operations, net

419 - - 419

Interest expense

66,018 188 (4,055 ) 62,151

Depreciation and amortization

46,759 10 - 46,769

Operating expenses

30,382 5,078 - 35,460

Impairments – real estate

21,401 6,713 - 28,114

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

498 - - 498

Restructuring costs

731 - - 731

Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliate

(12,280 ) - 12,701 421

Loss on note receivable foreclosure

(7,196 ) - - (7,196 )

Gain on extinguishment of debt

3,432 - - 3,432

Income tax benefit

495 631 - 1,126

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

55,066 (10,087 ) 12,711 57,690

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

260 (1,551 ) - (1,291 )

Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests

55,326 (11,638 ) 12,711 56,399

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

(516 ) (1,026 ) - (1,542 )

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

- (47 ) - (47 )

Net earnings attributable to NNN

$ 54,810 $ (12,711 ) $ 12,711 $ 54,810

Assets

$ 2,588,408 $ 237,715 $ (235,161 ) $ 2,590,962

Additions to long-lived assets:

Real estate

$ 44,433 $ 2,457 $ - $ 46,890

82


Table of Contents

2008

Investment
Assets
Inventory
Assets
Eliminations
(Intercompany)
Consolidated
Totals

External revenues

$ 218,692 $ 176 $ - $ 218,868

Intersegment revenues

12,727 606 (13,333 ) -

Interest revenue

8,351 28 - 8,379

Interest revenue Residuals

4,636 - - 4,636

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

- (308 ) 329 21

Interest expense

69,763 7,442 (13,241 ) 63,964

Depreciation and amortization

44,139 42 - 44,181

Operating expenses

25,347 9,538 - 34,885

Impairments – real estate

1,234 - - 1,234

Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

758 - - 758

Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates

(2,785 ) - 3,149 364

Loss on derivative instrument

(804 ) - - (804 )

Gain on extinguishment of debt

4,961 - - 4,961

Income tax benefit

1,331 5,848 - 7,179

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

105,868 (10,672 ) 3,386 98,582

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

12,112 9,277 - 21,389

Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests

117,980 (1,395 ) 3,386 119,971

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

(827 ) 936 - 109

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

- (2,927 ) - (2,927 )

Net earnings attributable to NNN

$ 117,153 $ (3,386 ) $ 3,386 $ 117,153

Assets

$ 2,650,040 $ 128,916 $ (129,485 ) $ 2,649,471

Additions to long-lived assets:

Real estate

$ 352,618 $ 33,745 $ - $ 386,363

83


Table of Contents

2007

Investment
Assets
Inventory
Assets
Eliminations
(Intercompany)
Consolidated
Totals

External revenues

$ 170,054 $ 327 $ - $ 170,381

Intersegment revenues

15,851 - (15,851 ) -

Interest revenue

8,858 40 - 8,898

Interest revenue on Residuals

4,882 - - 4,882

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

- (512 ) 844 332

Interest expense

58,193 8,502 (14,849 ) 51,846

Depreciation and amortization

31,232 108 - 31,340

Operating expenses

23,733 7,637 - 31,370

Impairments – real estate

288 128 - 416

Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

638 - - 638

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

(1,700 ) - 1,749 49

Income tax benefit

2,451 5,849 - 8,300

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

86,312 (10,671 ) 1,591 77,232

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

68,976 9,534 - 78,510

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

155,288 (1,137 ) 1,591 155,742

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

(689 ) 845 - 156

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

- (1,299 ) - (1,299 )

Net earnings attributable to NNN

$ 154,599 $ (1,591 ) $ 1,591 $ 154,599

Assets

$ 2,519,428 $ 263,368 $ (243,124 ) $ 2,539,672

Additions to long-lived assets:

Real estate

$ 677,101 $ 165,160 $ - $ 842,261

Note 24 – Fair Value Measurements:

NNN currently values its Residuals based upon an independent valuation which provides a discounted cash flow analysis based upon prepayment speeds, expected loan losses and yield curves. These valuation inputs are generally considered unobservable; therefore, the Residuals are considered Level 3 financial assets. The table below presents a reconciliation of the Residuals during the year ended December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

Balance at beginning of period

$ 22,000

Total gains (losses) – realized/unrealized:

Included in earnings

(498 )

Included in other comprehensive income

(1,640 )

Interest income on Residuals

4,252

Cash received from Residuals

(3,961 )

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

-

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

-

Balance at end of period

$ 20,153

Changes in gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to a change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the end of period

$ 9

84


Table of Contents

Note 25 – Major Tenants:

As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental and earned income.

Note 26 – Commitments and Contingencies:

As of December 31, 2009, NNN had letters of credit totaling $653,000 outstanding under its Credit Facility.

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various other legal actions which management believes is routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Note 27 – Subsequent Events:

NNN reviewed all subsequent events and transactions that have occurred after December 31, 2009, the date of the consolidated balance sheet, through February 25, 2010, the date of filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than included herein, there were no subsequent events or transactions.

85


Table of Contents

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Process for Assessment and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financing Reporting.

NNN carried out an assessment as of December 31, 2009, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) require NNN to present the conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer about the effectiveness of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the conclusions of NNN’s management about the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

CEO and CFO Certifications. Included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forms of “Certification” of NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The forms of Certification are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K that stockholders are currently reading is the information concerning the assessment referred to in the Section 302 certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in NNN’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to NNN’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and affected by NNN’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of NNN’s assets;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that NNN’s receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management or the Board of Directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NNN’s assets that could have a material adverse effect on NNN’s financial statements.

86


Table of Contents

Scope of the Assessments. The assessment by NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the assessment by NNN’s management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting included a review of procedures and discussions with NNN’s management and others at NNN. In the course of the assessments, NNN sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken.

NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is also assessed on an ongoing basis by personnel in NNN’s Accounting department and by NNN’s internal auditors in connection with their internal audit activities. The overall goals of these various assessment activities are to monitor NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting and to make modifications as necessary. NNN’s intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures and the internal control over financial reporting will be maintained and updated (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant. Management also sought to deal with other control matters in the assessment, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction was necessary to be made in accordance with NNN’s on-going procedures. The assessments of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning effectiveness of those controls can be reported in NNN’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Assessment of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for NNN. Management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Ernst & Young LLP, NNN’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued an attestation report on NNN’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the three months ended December 31, 2009, there were no changes in NNN’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NNN’s internal control for financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures or NNN’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of

87


Table of Contents

controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within NNN have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Nominees,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Executive Officers,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Code of Business Conduct” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information,” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and the information in such section is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal II: Proposal to Ratify Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

88


Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report.

(1) FinancialStatements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 45
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 47
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 48
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 50
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 56
(2)

FinancialStatement Schedules

Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and Notes as of December 31, 2009
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Notes as of December 31, 2009

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.

3. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1 First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2 Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3

Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to

89


Table of Contents

the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4. Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1 Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

4.2 Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.3 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4 Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6 Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.8 Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

90


Table of Contents

4.9 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.10 Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.11 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.12 Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.13 Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.14 Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.15 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.16 Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.17 Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

91


Table of Contents

4.18 Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10. Material Contracts

10.1 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.6 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.8 Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.9 Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated December 13, 2005, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

92


Table of Contents

10.10 First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated February 20, 2007, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.11 Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

12. Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

23. Consent of Independent Accountants

23.1 Ernst & Young LLP dated February 25, 2010 (filed herewith).

24. Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

31. Section 302 Certifications

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32. Section 906 Certifications

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

99. Additional Exhibits

99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

93


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 25 th day of February, 2010.

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

By:

/s/ Craig Macnab
Craig Macnab
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of Craig Macnab and Kevin B. Habicht as his attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Craig Macnab

Craig Macnab

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) February 25, 2010

/s/ Ted B. Lanier

Ted B. Lanier

Lead Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Don DeFosset

Don DeFosset

Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Dennis E. Gershenson

Dennis E. Gershenson

Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Richard B. Jennings

Richard B. Jennings

Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Robert C. Legler

Robert C. Legler

Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Robert Martinez

Robert Martinez

Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Kevin B. Habicht

Kevin B. Habicht

Director, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), Executive Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer February 25, 2010

94


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

3. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1 First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2 Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3 Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4. Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1 Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

4.2 Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.3 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4 Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

95


Table of Contents
4.6 Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.8 Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.9 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.10 Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.11 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.12 Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.13 Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.14 Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

96


Table of Contents

4.15 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.16 Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.17 Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.18 Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10. Material Contracts

10.1 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

97


Table of Contents
10.6 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.8 Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.9 Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated December 13, 2005, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.10 First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated February 20, 2007, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.11 Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

12. Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

23. Consent of Independent Accountants

23.1 Ernst & Young LLP dated February 25, 2010 (filed herewith).

24. Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

31. Section 302 Certifications

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

98


Table of Contents
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32. Section 906 Certifications

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

99. Additional Exhibits

99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

99


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:

7-Eleven:

Land O’ Lakes, FL

1,077 817 1,077 817 1,894 224 1999 10/98 (g) 40 years

Tampa, FL

1,081 917 1,081 917 1,998 248 1999 12/98 (g) 40 years

A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.:

Dover, NJ

1,138 3,238 1,138 3,238 4,376 901 1995 11/98 40 years

Academy:

Pasadena, TX

900 2,181 900 2,181 3,081 588 1994 03/99 40 years

Beaumont, TX

1,424 2,449 1,424 2,449 3,873 661 1992 03/99 40 years

Houston, TX

2,311 1,628 2,311 1,628 3,939 439 1976 03/99 40 years

Franklin, TN

1,807 2,108 1,807 2,108 3,915 319 1999 06/05 30 years

Ace Hardware and Lighting:

Bourbonnais, IL

298 1,329 298 1,329 1,627 300 1997 11/98 37 years

Advance Auto Parts:

Miami, FL

867 1,035 867 1,035 1,902 118 2005 12/04 (g) 40 years

American Payday Loans:

Des Moines, IA

108 379 108 379 487 43 1979 06/05 40 years

AmerUs Group Warehouse:

Des Moines, IA

28 85 28 85 113 39 1949 06/05 10 years

Amoco:

Miami, FL

969 969 (i ) 969 (i ) (i ) 05/03 (i )

Sunrise, FL

949 949 (i ) 949 (i ) (i ) 06/03 (i )

Amscot:

Tampa, FL

1,160 352 1,160 352 1,512 37 1981 10/05 40 years

Orlando, FL

764 866 764 866 1,630 78 2006 12/05 40 years

Orlando, FL

664 1,011 664 1,011 1,675 81 2006 12/05 40 years

Orlando, FL

358 922 358 922 1,280 80 2006 02/06 (g) 40 years

Orlando, FL

546 938 546 938 1,484 79 2006 02/06 (g) 40 years

Clearwater, FL

456 332 456 332 788 27 1967 09/06 (g) 40 years

Applebee’s:

Ballwin, MO

1,496 1,404 1,496 1,404 2,900 282 1995 12/01 40 years

Arby’s:

Whitmore Lake, MI

171 469 171 469 640 94 1993 12/01 40 years

Washington Courthouse,

OH

157 546 157 546 703 110 1998 12/01 40 years

Colorado Springs,

CO

206 534 206 534 740 107 1998 12/01 40 years

Thomson, GA

268 504 268 504 772 101 1997 12/01 40 years

Arizona Oil:

Peoria, AZ

860 1,117 860 1,117 1,977 60 1987 05/08 30 years

Tucson, AZ

1,105 1,336 1,105 1,336 2,441 62 1992 05/08 35 years

Prescott, AZ

1,266 1,261 1,266 1,261 2,527 59 1997 05/08 35 years

Sedona, AZ

1,281 1,324 1,281 1,324 2,605 54 2000 05/08 40 years

Gilbert, AZ

1,317 1,304 1,317 1,304 2,621 61 1996 05/08 35 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 1


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Tucson, AZ

1,083 1,599 1,083 1,599 2,682 74 1992 05/08 35 years

Mesa, AZ

1,332 1,367 1,332 1,367 2,699 74 1986 05/08 30 years

Scottsdale, AZ

1,529 1,373 1,529 1,373 2,902 64 1999 05/08 35 years

Miami, AZ

762 2,148 762 2,148 2,910 100 1998 05/08 35 years

Tucson, AZ

1,457 1,619 1,457 1,619 3,076 75 1995 05/08 35 years

Tucson, AZ

1,223 1,911 1,223 1,911 3,134 89 1996 05/08 35 years

Glendale, AZ

1,817 2,415 1,817 2,415 4,232 98 2001 05/08 40 years

Casa Grande, AZ

2,340 1,894 2,340 1,894 4,234 88 1993 05/08 35 years

Mesa, AZ

2,219 2,140 2,219 2,140 4,359 87 2000 05/08 40 years

Ashley Furniture:

Altamonte Springs,

FL

2,906 4,877 315 2,906 5,192 8,098 1,564 1997 09/97 40 years

Louisville, KY

1,667 4,989 1,667 4,989 6,656 598 2005 03/05 40 years

Babies “R” Us:

Arlington, TX

831 2,612 831 2,612 3,443 882 1996 06/96 40 years

Independence, MO

1,679 2,302 115 1,679 2,417 4,096 472 1996 12/01 40 years

Barnes & Noble:

Brandon, FL

1,476 1,527 1,476 1,527 3,003 572 1995 08/94 (f) 40 years

Glendale, CO

3,245 2,722 3,245 2,722 5,967 1,038 1994 09/94 40 years

Houston, TX

3,308 2,396 3,308 2,396 5,704 854 1995 10/94 (f) 40 years

Plantation, FL

4,677 (p) 3,616 3,616 (c ) 3,616 (c ) 1996 05/95 (f) (c )

Freehold, NJ (n)

2,917 2,261 2,917 2,261 5,178 787 1995 01/96 40 years

Dayton, OH

1,413 3,325 1,413 3,325 4,738 1,026 1996 05/97 40 years

Redding, CA

497 1,626 497 1,626 2,123 510 1997 06/97 40 years

Memphis, TN

1,574 2,242 1,574 2,242 3,816 332 1997 09/97 40 years

Marlton, NJ

2,831 4,319 2,709 4,319 7,028 1,201 1995 11/98 40 years

Bassett Furniture:

Fairview Heights, IL

1,258 2,623 1,258 2,623 3,881 276 1980 10/05 40 years

Bealls:

Sarasota, FL

1,078 1,795 1,078 1,795 2,873 278 1996 09/97 40 years

Beautiful America Dry Cleaners:

Orlando, FL

52 (o) 40 111 40 111 151 16 2001 02/04 40 years

Bed Bath & Beyond:

Richmond, VA

2,680 (p) 1,184 2,843 1,184 2,843 4,027 539 1997 06/98 40 years

Glendale, AZ

1,082 2,758 1,082 2,758 3,840 721 1999 12/98 (g) 40 years

Midland, MI

231 2,702 231 2,702 2,933 212 2006 07/03 40 years

Best Buy:

Brandon, FL

2,985 2,772 2,985 2,772 5,757 892 1996 02/97 40 years

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

3,709 2,359 3,709 2,359 6,068 740 1970 06/97 40 years

Rockville, MD

6,233 3,419 6,233 3,419 9,652 1,065 1995 07/97 40 years

Fairfax, VA

3,052 3,218 3,052 3,218 6,270 996 1995 08/97 40 years

St. Petersburg, FL

4,277 (p) 4,032 2,611 4,032 2,611 6,643 566 1997 09/97 35 years

Pittsburg, PA

2,331 2,293 2,331 2,293 4,624 662 1997 06/98 40 years

Denver, CO

8,882 4,373 8,882 4,373 13,255 934 1991 06/01 40 years

Best Smoke & Gas:

Abbottstown, PA

55 200 55 200 255 20 2000 01/06 40 years

Billy Bob’s:

Gresham, OR

817 108 817 108 925 22 1993 12/01 40 years

BJ’s Wholesale Club:

Orlando, FL

4,246 (o) 3,271 8,627 367 3,271 8,993 12,264 1,296 2001 02/04 40 years

Black Fox Beauty Supply:

Corpus Christi, TX

116 137 11 116 148 264 59 1967 11/93 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 2


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Blockbuster Video:

Conyers, GA

320 556 320 556 876 174 1997 06/97 40 years

Mobile, AL

843 562 843 562 1,405 113 1997 12/01 40 years

Glasgow, KY

303 561 303 561 864 113 1997 12/01 40 years

Alice, TX

318 578 318 578 896 116 1995 12/01 40 years

Gainesville, GA

295 612 295 612 907 123 1997 12/01 40 years

Kingsville, TX

499 458 30 499 487 986 94 1995 12/01 40 years

Mobile, AL

491 498 491 498 989 100 1997 12/01 40 years

BMW:

Duluth, GA

4,434 4,080 6,559 4,504 10,639 15,143 1,169 1984 12/01 40 years

Borders:

Wilmington, DE

3,031 6,062 2,994 6,062 9,056 2,277 1994 12/94 40 years

Richmond, VA

2,177 2,600 2,177 2,600 4,777 946 1995 06/95 40 years

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

4,505 (p) 3,165 3,319 3,165 3,319 6,484 763 1995 02/96 33 years

Bangor, ME

1,547 2,487 1,547 2,487 4,034 841 1996 06/96 40 years

Altamonte Springs,

FL

1,947 1,947 (c ) 1,947 (c ) 1997 09/97 (c )

Borough of Abbottstown:

Abbottstown, PA

55 200 55 200 255 20 2000 01/06 40 years

Boston Market:

Warren, OH

562 468 562 468 1,030 94 1997 12/01 40 years

Novi, MI

836 651 836 298 1,134 65 1995 12/01 40 years

Burton, MI

620 707 620 707 1,327 142 1997 12/01 40 years

Geneva, IL

1,125 1,037 1,125 893 2,018 182 1996 12/01 40 years

Orland Park, IL

562 556 562 377 939 78 1995 12/01 40 years

N. Olmsted, OH

602 461 602 389 991 79 1996 12/01 40 years

Buck’s:

St. Louis, MO

776 3,822 776 3,822 4,598 68 2009 12/07 (m) 40 years

Buffalo Wild Wings:

Michigan City, IN

163 492 163 492 655 99 1996 12/01 40 years

Bugaboo Creek:

Lithonia, GA

923 1,276 923 1,276 2,199 81 2002 06/07 40 years

Rochester, NY

792 1,535 792 1,535 2,327 98 1995 06/07 40 years

Burger King:

Colonial Heights,

VA

662 610 662 610 1,272 123 1997 12/01 40 years

Carl’s Jr.:

Spokane, WA

471 530 471 530 1,001 107 1996 12/01 40 years

Tucson, AZ

681 536 103 681 639 1,320 277 1988 06/05 10 years

Chandler, AZ

729 644 729 644 1,373 146 1984 06/05 20 years

Carvers:

Centerville, OH

851 1,059 851 1,059 1,910 213 1986 12/01 40 years

Cash Advance:

Mesa, AZ

43 113 251 43 363 406 45 1997 12/01 40 years

Certified Auto Sales:

Albuquerque, NM

1,113 1,419 1,113 1,419 2,532 158 2005 04/04 (f) 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 3


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Champps:

Irving, TX

1,760 1,724 1,760 1,724 3,484 347 2000 12/01 40 years

Alpharetta, GA

3,033 1,642 3,033 1,642 4,675 330 1999 12/01 40 years

Char-Hut:

Sunrise, FL

287 424 287 424 711 59 1979 05/04 40 years

Checkers:

Orlando, FL

257 257 (c ) 257 (c ) 1988 07/92 (c )

Chili’s:

Milledgeville, GA

516 1,997 516 1,997 2,513 214 2005 09/05 40 years

Camden, SC

627 1,888 627 1,888 2,515 203 2005 09/05 40 years

Sumter, SC

800 1,717 800 1,717 2,517 174 2004 12/05 40 years

Hinesville, GA

921 1,898 921 1,898 2,819 136 2006 02/07 40 years

Albany, GA

615 1,984 615 1,984 2,599 110 2007 06/07 (m) 40 years

Statesboro, GA

703 1,888 703 1,888 2,591 100 2007 06/07 (m) 40 years

Florence, SC

889 1,715 889 1,715 2,604 109 2007 06/07 40 years

Valdosta, GA

716 1,871 716 1,871 2,587 95 2007 07/07 (m) 40 years

Tifton, GA

454 1,550 454 1,550 2,004 47 2008 06/08 (m) 40 years

Evans, GA

700 1,511 700 1,511 2,211 33 2009 10/08 (m) 40 years

Wichita, KS

420 623 420 623 1,043 1 1995 12/09 30 years

Jefferson City, MO

305 898 305 898 1,203 1 2003 12/09 35 years

Merriam, KS

853 981 853 981 1,834 1 1998 12/09 30 years

China 1:

Cohoes, NY

16 87 1 16 88 104 12 1994 09/04 40 years

China Wok:

Carlisle, PA

90 107 90 107 197 11 1988 01/06 40 years

Claim Jumper:

Roseville, CA

1,557 2,014 1,557 2,014 3,571 405 2000 12/01 40 years

Tempe, AZ

2,531 2,921 2,531 2,921 5,452 587 2000 12/01 40 years

Continental Rental:

Lapeer, MI

88 633 88 633 721 38 2007 10/05 40 years

CORA Rehabilitation

Clinics:

Orlando, FL

104 (o) 80 221 80 221 301 32 2001 02/04 40 years

Corpus Christi Flea Market:

Corpus Christi, TX

224 2,159 224 2,159 2,383 582 1983 03/99 40 years

CVS:

San Antonio, TX

441 441 (c ) 441 (c ) 1993 12/93 (c )

Lafayette, LA

968 968 (c ) 968 (c ) 1995 01/96 (c )

Midwest City, OK

673 1,103 673 1,103 1,776 381 1996 03/96 40 years

Pantego, TX

1,016 1,449 1,016 1,449 2,465 454 1997 06/97 40 years

Flower Mound,

TX

932 881 932 881 1,813 130 1996 09/97 40 years

Leavenworth, KS

726 1,331 726 1,331 2,057 384 1998 11/97 (g) 40 years

Arlington, TX

2,079 1,397 2,079 1,397 3,476 397 1998 11/97 (g) 40 years

Lewisville, TX

789 1,335 789 1,335 2,124 377 1998 04/98 (g) 40 years

Forest Hill, TX

692 1,175 692 1,175 1,867 334 1998 04/98 (g) 40 years

Garland, TX

1,477 1,400 1,477 1,400 2,877 389 1998 06/98 (g) 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 4


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Oklahoma City, OK

1,581 1,471 1,581 1,471 3,052 403 1999 08/98 (g) 40 years

Dallas, TX

2,618 2,571 2,618 2,571 5,189 399 2003 06/99 40 years

Gladstone, MO

1,851 1,740 1,851 1,740 3,591 408 2000 12/99 (g) 40 years

Dave & Buster’s:

Hilliard, OH

934 4,689 934 4,689 5,623 366 1998 11/06 40 years

Tulsa, OK

1,862 2,105 1,862 2,105 3,967 50 2009 04/08 40 years

Wauwatosa, WI

5,694 5,694 (e ) 5,694 (e ) (e ) 12/08 (e )

Denny’s:

Columbus, TX (n)

428 817 428 817 1,245 164 1997 12/01 40 years

N. Miami, FL

855 151 855 151 1,006 25 1977 09/06 20 years

Wethersfield, CT

884 176 884 176 1,060 29 1978 09/06 20 years

Nampa, ID

357 729 357 729 1,086 120 1979 09/06 20 years

Indianapolis, IN

358 767 358 767 1,125 126 1978 09/06 20 years

Merriville, IN

368 813 368 813 1,181 134 1976 09/06 20 years

Lafayette, IN

424 773 416 773 1,189 127 1978 09/06 20 years

Tucson, AZ

922 290 922 290 1,212 48 1979 09/06 20 years

Amarillo, TX

590 632 590 632 1,222 104 1982 09/06 20 years

Carson, CA

1,246 157 1,246 157 1,403 26 1975 09/06 20 years

Corpus Christi,

TX

345 776 300 345 1,076 1,421 136 1980 09/06 20 years

Fairfax, VA

768 683 768 683 1,451 112 1979 09/06 20 years

Raleigh, NC

1,094 482 1,094 482 1,576 79 1984 09/06 20 years

Hialeah, FL

432 175 432 175 607 29 1978 09/06 20 years

North Richland

Hills, TX

500 130 500 130 630 21 1970 09/06 20 years

Dallas, TX

497 150 497 150 647 25 1979 09/06 20 years

Sugarland, TX

315 334 315 334 649 55 1997 09/06 20 years

Florissant, MO

443 238 443 238 681 39 1977 09/06 20 years

Arlington Heights,

IL

470 228 470 228 698 37 1977 09/06 20 years

Colorado Springs, CO

321 377 321 377 698 62 1984 09/06 20 years

Campbell, CA

460 238 460 238 698 39 1976 09/06 20 years

Chehalis, WA

415 287 415 287 702 47 1977 09/06 20 years

Indianapolis, IN

223 483 223 483 706 79 1979 09/06 20 years

Ft. Worth, TX

392 314 392 314 706 52 1974 09/06 20 years

Southfield, MI

401 330 401 330 731 54 1980 09/06 20 years

Provo, UT

519 216 519 216 735 36 1978 09/06 20 years

Federal Way, WA

543 193 543 193 736 32 1977 09/06 20 years

Chubbuck, ID

350 394 344 394 738 65 1983 09/06 20 years

Hermitage, PA

321 420 321 420 741 69 1980 09/06 20 years

Indianapolis, IN

231 511 231 511 742 84 1974 09/06 20 years

Little Rock, AR

672 77 672 77 749 13 1979 09/06 20 years

Boardman Township,

OH

497 258 497 258 755 42 1977 09/06 20 years

Middleburg Heights,

OH

497 260 497 260 757 43 1976 09/06 20 years

Pueblo, CO

475 302 475 302 777 50 1980 09/06 20 years

W. Palm Beach, FL

619 161 619 161 780 26 1984 09/06 20 years

Tacoma, WA

580 201 580 201 781 33 1984 09/06 20 years

St. Louis, MO

520 266 520 266 786 44 1973 09/06 20 years

Alexandria, VA

604 196 604 196 800 32 1981 09/06 20 years

Omaha, NE

496 314 496 314 810 52 1994 09/06 20 years

Pompano Beach, FL

436 394 436 394 830 65 1976 09/06 20 years

Indianapolis, IN

326 511 326 511 837 84 1978 09/06 20 years

Novi, MI

545 305 545 305 850 50 1979 09/06 20 years

Houston, TX

504 348 504 348 852 57 1976 09/06 20 years

Austintown, OH

466 397 466 397 863 65 1980 09/06 20 years

Clackamas, OR

468 407 468 407 875 67 1993 09/06 20 years

Worcester, MA

383 493 383 493 876 81 1978 09/06 20 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 5


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Little Rock, AR

703 180 703 180 883 30 1979 09/06 20 years

Indianapolis, IN

310 590 310 590 900 97 1981 09/06 20 years

Maplewood, MN

630 271 630 271 901 45 1983 09/06 20 years

Laurel, MD

528 379 528 379 907 62 1976 09/06 20 years

Enfield, CT

684 229 684 229 913 38 1976 09/06 20 years

Portland, OR

764 161 764 161 925 27 1977 09/06 20 years

Collinsville, IL

676 283 676 283 959 47 1979 09/06 20 years

Kernersville, NC

407 557 407 557 964 92 2000 09/06 20 years

Colorado Springs, CO

585 390 585 390 975 64 1978 09/06 20 years

Boise, ID

514 477 514 477 991 73 1983 12/06 20 years

Virginia Gardens, FL

793 133 793 133 926 20 1977 01/07 20 years

St. Louis, MO

635 303 635 303 938 45 1980 01/07 20 years

Dick’s Sporting Goods:

Taylor, MI

1,920 3,527 1,920 3,527 5,447 1,172 1996 08/96 40 years

White Marsh, MD

2,681 3,917 2,681 3,917 6,598 1,302 1996 08/96 40 years

Dollar General:

Memphis, TN

266 1,136 266 1,136 1,402 299 1998 12/97 40 years

Dollar Tree:

Garland, TX

239 626 239 626 865 133 1994 02/94 40 years

Copperas Cove, TX

242 512 194 242 706 948 181 1972 11/98 40 years

Donato’s:

Medina, OH

405 464 405 464 869 93 1996 12/01 40 years

Dr. Clean Dry Cleaners:

Monticello, NY

20 72 20 72 92 9 1996 03/05 40 years

Easyhome:

Cohoes, NY

59 319 222 59 541 600 51 1994 09/04 40 years

El Tapatio Grill:

Hammond, LA

248 814 62 248 627 875 140 1997 12/01 40 years

Enterprise Rent-A-Car:

Wilmington, NC

218 327 33 218 360 578 67 1981 12/01 40 years

Express Oil Change:

Birmingham, AL

470 695 470 695 1,165 31 2008 02/08 (f) 40 years

Opelika, AL

547 680 547 680 1,227 32 2006 02/08 40 years

Florence, AL

110 381 110 381 491 24 1987 02/08 30 years

Muscle Shoals, AL

168 624 168 624 792 39 1985 02/08 30 years

Helena, AL

363 628 363 628 991 29 1998 02/08 40 years

Memphis, TN

402 721 402 721 1,123 19 2001 12/08 40 years

Cordova, TN

639 785 639 785 1,424 20 2000 12/08 40 years

Lakeland, TN

186 489 186 489 675 13 2000 12/08 40 years

Horn Lake, MS

326 611 326 611 937 18 1998 12/08 35 years

Fallas Paredes:

Arlington, TX

318 1,680 242 318 1,923 2,241 572 1996 06/96 38 years

Family Dollar:

Hudson Falls, NY

51 380 51 380 431 50 1993 09/04 40 years

Cohoes, NY

96 507 5 96 512 608 67 1994 09/04 40 years

Monticello, NY

96 352 96 352 448 42 1996 03/05 40 years

Famous Footwear:

Lapeer, MI

163 835 163 835 998 48 2007 10/05 40 years

Fantastic Sams:

Eden Prairie, MN

65 181 81 65 261 326 50 1997 12/01 40 years

Fazoli’s:

Bay City, MI

647 634 647 634 1,281 127 1997 12/01 40 years

Ferguson:

Destin, FL

554 1,012 253 554 1,265 1,819 80 2006 03/07 40 years

Flash Markets:

Lebanon, TN

582 2,063 582 2,063 2,645 97 2007 03/07 (m) 40 years

Food 4 Less:

Chula Vista, CA

3,569 3,569 (c ) 3,569 (c ) 1995 11/98 (c )

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 6


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Food Fast:

Kemp, TX

581 505 581 505 1,086 51 1986 06/07 25 years

Forney, TX

473 654 473 654 1,127 55 1990 06/07 30 years

Forney, TX

545 707 545 707 1,252 60 1989 06/07 30 years

Tyler, TX

742 546 742 546 1,288 56 1985 06/07 25 years

Jacksonville, TX

660 632 660 632 1,292 107 1976 06/07 15 years

Tyler, TX

488 831 488 831 1,319 106 1980 06/07 20 years

Bossier City, LA

883 658 883 658 1,541 111 1975 06/07 15 years

Longview, TX

178 236 178 236 414 30 1977 06/07 20 years

Tyler, TX

188 329 188 329 517 33 1984 06/07 25 years

Longview, TX

252 304 252 304 556 31 1983 06/07 25 years

Tyler, TX

323 283 323 283 606 36 1978 06/07 20 years

Shreveport, LA

361 250 361 250 611 42 1969 06/07 15 years

Gun Barrel City, TX

270 386 270 386 656 39 1986 06/07 25 years

Tyler, TX

258 419 258 419 677 53 1978 06/07 20 years

Flint, TX

272 411 272 411 683 42 1985 06/07 25 years

Longview, TX

271 431 271 431 702 36 1990 06/07 30 years

Gun Barrel City, TX

242 467 242 467 709 48 1988 06/07 25 years

Brownsboro, TX

328 385 328 385 713 33 1990 06/07 30 years

Mabank, TX

229 494 229 494 723 50 1986 06/07 25 years

Tyler, TX

302 455 302 455 757 58 1981 06/07 20 years

Tyler, TX

256 542 256 542 798 69 1980 06/07 20 years

Longview, TX

426 382 426 382 808 39 1984 06/07 25 years

Tyler, TX

316 545 316 545 861 46 1989 06/07 30 years

Tyler, TX

542 403 481 403 884 41 1984 06/07 25 years

Longview, TX

360 535 360 535 895 54 1983 06/07 25 years

Mt. Vernon, TX

292 666 292 666 958 68 1990 06/07 25 years

Longview, TX

403 572 403 572 975 58 1985 06/07 25 years

Fresh Market:

Gainesville, FL

317 1,248 656 317 1,904 2,221 240 1982 03/99 40 years

Fuel-On:

Johnsonburg, PA

781 504 781 504 1,285 110 1978 08/05 20 years

White Haven, PA

486 867 486 867 1,353 190 1990 08/05 20 years

Dallas, PA

677 1,091 677 1,091 1,768 239 1995 08/05 20 years

Yeagertown, PA

142 180 142 180 322 39 1977 08/05 20 years

Hazleton, PA

2,529 728 2,529 728 3,257 159 2001 08/05 20 years

Kane, PA

478 592 356 356 1984 08/05 20 years

St. Mary’s, PA

274 261 274 261 535 57 1979 08/05 20 years

Luzerne, PA

171 415 171 415 586 91 1989 08/05 20 years

Bloomsburg, PA

541 146 541 146 687 32 1967 08/05 20 years

Emporium, PA

380 569 380 569 949 124 1996 08/05 20 years

Minersville, PA

680 582 680 582 1,262 58 1974 01/06 40 years

Houtzdale, PA

541 500 356 356 1977 01/06 15 years

Summerville, PA

93 272 93 272 365 27 1988 01/06 40 years

Carlisle, PA

170 202 170 202 372 20 1988 01/06 40 years

Danville, PA

180 359 180 359 539 36 1988 01/06 40 years

Zelienople, PA

160 437 160 437 597 43 1988 01/06 40 years

Furniture Xpress:

Buford, GA

1,925 5,035 1,925 5,035 6,960 687 2003 07/04 40 years

Furr’s Family Dining:

Las Cruces, NM

947 2,182 947 2,182 3,129 180 2006 01/06 (m) 40 years

Tucson, AZ

1,156 1,156 (e ) 1,156 (e ) (e ) 07/06 (e )

Moore, OK

939 2,429 939 2,429 3,368 134 2007 03/07 (m) 40 years

Gander Mountain:

Amarillo, TX

1,514 5,781 1,514 5,781 7,295 741 2004 11/04 40 years

Gate Petroleum:

Rocky Mount, NC

259 1,164 259 1,164 1,423 132 2000 06/05 40 years

Concord, NC

852 1,201 852 1,201 2,053 136 2001 06/05 40 years

Gen-X Clothing:

Federal Way, WA

2,037 1,662 257 2,037 1,919 3,956 519 1994 06/98 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 7


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Golden Corral:

Lake Placid, FL

115 305 44 115 349 464 235 1985 05/85 35 years

Dallas, TX

1,138 1,025 1,138 1,025 2,163 206 1994 12/01 40 years

Brandon, FL

1,188 1,339 1,188 1,339 2,527 269 1998 12/01 40 years

Temple Terrace, FL

1,330 1,391 1,330 1,391 2,721 280 1997 12/01 40 years

Goodyear Truck & Tire:

Park City, KS

214 687 214 687 901 156 1989 06/05 20 years

Anthony, TX

(l ) 1,242 (l ) 1,242 1,242 76 2007 02/07 40 years

Great Clips:

Lapeer, MI

27 194 27 194 221 11 2007 10/05 40 years

Green Light Convenience:

Moosic, PA

323 309 323 309 632 68 1980 08/05 20 years

Guitar Center:

Roseville, MN

1,599 1,419 1,599 1,419 3,018 143 1994 08/06 40 years

GymKix:

Copperas Cove, TX

204 432 171 204 603 807 155 1972 11/98 40 years

H&R Block:

Swansea, IL

46 132 69 46 201 247 39 1997 12/01 40 years

Hastings:

Nacogdoches, TX

397 1,257 397 1,257 1,654 350 1997 11/98 40 years

Havertys Furniture:

Orlando, FL

820 2,441 6 820 2,448 3,268 936 1992 05/93 40 years

Clearwater, FL

1,184 2,526 44 1,184 2,570 3,754 1,060 1992 05/93 40 years

Pensacola, FL

633 1,595 603 1,595 2,198 539 1994 06/96 40 years

Bowie, MD

1,966 4,221 1,966 4,221 6,187 1,147 1997 12/97 39 years

Healthy Pet:

Suwanee, GA

175 1,038 175 1,038 1,213 79 1997 12/06 40 years

Colonial Heights, VA

160 746 160 746 906 55 1996 01/07 40 years

Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:

Baltimore, MD

470 813 470 813 1,283 226 1968 11/98 40 years

Glen Burnie, MD

632 932 632 932 1,564 259 1968 11/98 40 years

Hog Pit:

Tucson, AZ

827 305 18 845 305 1,150 70 1974 12/01 40 years

Hollywood Video:

Cincinnati, OH

282 521 279 543 539 1,082 106 1998 12/01 40 years

Clifton, CO

245 732 245 732 977 147 1998 12/01 40 years

Home Decor:

Memphis, TN

549 540 364 549 904 1,453 224 1998 12/97 40 years

Home Depot:

Sunrise, FL

5,149 5,149 (i ) 5,149 (i ) (i ) 05/03 (i )

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 8


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

HomeGoods:

Fairfax, VA

978 1,414 937 978 2,352 3,330 482 1995 12/95 40 years

Hooters:

Tampa, FL

784 505 784 505 1,289 101 1993 12/01 40 years

Humana:

Sunrise, FL

800 253 800 253 1,053 35 1984 05/04 40 years

Hy-Vee:

St. Joseph, MO

1,580 2,849 1,580 2,849 4,429 519 1991 09/02 40 years

Int’l House of Pancakes:

Midwest City, OK

407 407 407 (i ) (i ) 11/00 (i )

Ankeny, IA

693 515 693 515 1,208 78 2002 06/05 30 years

J & J Insurance:

Hollywood, FL

193 44 18 116 116 1960 12/05 15 years

Jack in the Box:

Plano, TX

1,055 1,237 1,055 1,237 2,292 140 2001 06/05 40 years

Jacobson Industrial:

Des Moines, IA

61 112 61 112 173 26 1973 06/05 20 years

Jared Jewelers:

Richmond, VA

955 1,336 955 1,336 2,291 269 1998 12/01 40 years

Brandon, FL

1,197 1,182 1,197 1,182 2,379 226 2001 05/02 40 years

Lithonia, GA

1,271 1,216 1,271 1,216 2,487 232 2001 05/02 40 years

Houston, TX

1,676 1,440 1,676 1,440 3,116 253 1999 12/02 40 years

Jazzercise Fitness Center:

Orlando, FL

48 (o) 37 101 37 101 138 15 2001 02/04 40 years

Jin’s Asian Cafe:

Sealy, TX

67 74 67 74 141 20 1982 03/99 40 years

Jo-Ann etc:

Corpus Christi,

TX

818 896 12 818 909 1,727 366 1967 11/93 40 years

St. Peters, MO

1,741 5,406 1,741 5,406 7,147 603 2005 06/05 (g) 40 years

Johnny Carino’s:

S. Beaumont, TX

439 1,363 439 1,363 1,802 274 2000 12/01 40 years

Lubbock, TX

1,007 1,206 1,007 1,206 2,213 242 1995 12/01 40 years

Lewisville, TX

1,370 1,019 1,370 1,019 2,389 205 1994 12/01 40 years

Joyful Noize Cafe:

Montgomery, AL

1,418 1,140 1,418 1,044 2,462 218 1999 12/01 40 years

Kangaroo Express:

Siler City, NC

586 645 586 645 1,231 54 1998 08/06 40 years

Sanford, NC

666 661 666 661 1,327 56 2000 08/06 40 years

Sanford, NC

1,638 1,371 1,638 1,371 3,009 116 2003 08/06 40 years

Carthage, NC

485 354 485 354 839 30 1989 08/06 40 years

West End, NC

426 516 426 516 942 44 1999 08/06 40 years

Belleview, FL

471 1,451 471 1,451 1,922 122 2006 08/06 40 years

Jacksonville, FL

683 1,362 683 1,362 2,045 115 1969 08/06 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 9


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Jacksonville, FL

807 1,239 807 1,239 2,046 105 1975 08/06 40 years

Destin, FL

1,366 1,192 1,366 1,192 2,558 98 2000 09/06 40 years

Niceville, FL

1,434 1,124 1,434 1,124 2,558 93 2000 09/06 40 years

Kill Devil Hills, NC

490 741 490 741 1,231 59 1995 10/06 40 years

Kill Devil Hills, NC

679 552 679 552 1,231 44 1990 10/06 40 years

Interlachen, FL

519 1,500 519 1,500 2,019 67 2007 10/06 40 years

Clarksville, TN

521 710 521 710 1,231 54 1999 12/06 40 years

Clarksville, TN

276 955 276 955 1,231 73 1999 12/06 40 years

Gallatin, TN

474 757 474 757 1,231 57 1999 12/06 40 years

Midland City, AL

729 2,538 729 2,538 3,267 193 2006 12/06 40 years

Naples, FL

3,195 1,403 3,195 1,403 4,598 107 2001 12/06 40 years

Oxford, MS

440 1,097 440 1,097 1,537 83 1998 12/06 40 years

Columbiana, AL

771 989 771 989 1,760 73 1982 01/07 40 years

Naples, FL

3,162 1,597 3,162 1,597 4,759 115 1995 02/07 40 years

Longs, SC

745 758 745 758 1,503 53 2001 03/07 40 years

Kentwood, LA

985 891 985 891 1,876 62 2001 03/07 40 years

Dothan, AL

774 1,886 774 1,886 2,660 132 2007 03/07 40 years

Naples, FL

2,412 1,589 2,412 1,589 4,001 104 2000 05/07 40 years

Montgomery, AL

666 1,185 666 1,185 1,851 75 1998 06/07 40 years

Cary, NC

1,314 2,125 1,314 2,125 3,439 126 2007 08/07 40 years

Kash n’ Karry:

Brandon, FL

3,031 (p) 322 1,222 322 1,222 1,544 190 1983 03/99 40 years

Keg Steakhouse:

Tacoma, WA

527 795 527 795 1,322 160 1981 12/01 40 years

Lynnwood, WA

1,256 649 1,256 649 1,905 131 1992 12/01 40 years

Bellingham, WA

397 456 397 456 853 92 1981 12/01 40 years

Kerasotes Theatre:

Michigan City, IN

1,996 8,422 1,996 8,422 10,418 482 2005 09/07 40 years

Machesney Park, IL

3,018 8,770 3,018 8,770 11,788 502 2005 09/07 40 years

New Lenox, IL

6,778 10,980 6,778 10,980 17,758 629 2004 09/07 40 years

Naperville, IL

6,141 11,624 6,141 11,624 17,765 666 2006 09/07 40 years

Galesburg, IL

1,205 2,441 1,205 2,441 3,646 140 2003 09/07 40 years

Evansville, IN

1,300 4,269 1,300 4,269 5,569 280 1999 09/07 35 years

Bolingbrook, IL

2,937 3,032 2,937 3,032 5,969 232 1994 09/07 30 years

Bloomington, IN

2,338 4,000 2,338 4,000 6,338 367 1987 09/07 25 years

Brighton, CO

1,070 5,491 1,070 5,491 6,561 315 2005 09/07 40 years

Muncie, IN

1,243 5,512 1,243 5,512 6,755 316 2005 09/07 40 years

Castle Rock, CO

2,905 5,002 2,905 5,002 7,907 287 2005 09/07 40 years

Lake Delton, WI

2,063 8,366 2,063 8,366 10,429 468 1999 01/08 35 years

Chicago, IL

7,257 10,955 7,257 10,955 18,212 536 2007 01/08 40 years

Schererville, IN

6,619 14,225 6,619 14,225 20,844 929 1996 01/08 30 years

Quincy, IL

1,297 2,850 1,297 2,850 4,147 159 1982 01/08 35 years

Johnson Creek, WI

1,433 3,932 1,433 3,932 5,365 220 1997 01/08 35 years

KFC:

Fenton, MO

307 496 307 496 803 264 1985 07/92 33 years

Erie, PA

517 496 517 496 1,013 100 1996 12/01 40 years

Marysville, WA

647 546 647 546 1,193 110 1996 12/01 40 years

Evansville, IN

370 767 370 767 1,137 69 2004 05/06 40 years

Kohl’s:

Florence, AL

818 1,047 818 1,047 1,865 85 2006 06/04 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 10


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Kum & Go:

Omaha, NE

393 214 393 214 607 49 1979 06/05 20 years

LA Fitness:

Centerville, OH

2,700 8,572 2,700 8,572 11,272 116 2009 06/08 (m) 40 years

Warren, MI

2,360 6,674 2,360 6,674 9,034 132 2009 07/08 (m) 40 years

Cincinnati, OH

5,145 9,011 5,145 9,011 14,156 122 2009 08/08 (m) 40 years

Las Margaritas:

Indianapolis, IN

640 1,107 640 1,107 1,747 211 1996 12/01 40 years

Lil’ Champ:

Gainesville, FL

900 1,800 900 1,800 2,700 126 2006 07/05 (m) 40 years

Jacksonville, FL

2,225 3,265 2,225 3,265 5,490 130 2006 08/05 40 years

Ocala, FL

846 1,564 846 1,564 2,410 99 2006 02/06 (m) 40 years

Logan’s Roadhouse:

San Marcos, TX

837 1,453 837 1,453 2,290 114 2000 11/06 40 years

Warner Robins, GA

905 1,534 905 1,534 2,439 120 2004 11/06 40 years

Opelika, AL

1,028 1,753 1,028 1,753 2,781 137 2005 11/06 40 years

Fort Wayne, IN

1,274 2,110 1,172 2,110 3,282 165 2003 11/06 40 years

Smyrna, TN

1,335 2,047 1,335 2,047 3,382 160 2002 11/06 40 years

Sanford, FL

1,678 1,730 1,678 1,730 3,408 135 1999 11/06 40 years

Jackson, TN

1,200 2,246 1,200 2,246 3,446 175 1994 11/06 40 years

Greenwood, IN

1,341 2,105 1,341 2,105 3,446 164 2000 11/06 40 years

Lake Charles, LA

1,285 2,202 1,285 2,202 3,487 172 1998 11/06 40 years

Cookeville, TN

1,262 2,271 1,262 2,271 3,533 177 1997 11/06 40 years

Hurst, TX

1,858 1,916 1,858 1,916 3,774 150 1999 11/06 40 years

McAllen, TX

1,608 2,178 1,608 2,178 3,786 170 2005 11/06 40 years

Beckley, WV

1,396 2,405 1,396 2,405 3,801 188 2006 11/06 40 years

Roanoke, VA

2,302 1,947 2,302 1,947 4,249 152 1998 11/06 40 years

Alexandria, LA

1,218 3,049 1,218 3,049 4,267 238 1998 11/06 40 years

Southhaven, MS

1,298 1,338 1,298 1,338 2,636 102 2005 12/06 40 years

Franklin, TN

2,519 1,705 2,519 1,705 4,224 130 1995 12/06 40 years

Lowe’s:

Memphis, TN

3,215 9,170 3,215 9,170 12,385 1,731 2001 06/02 40 years

M & T Bank:

Carlisle, PA

87 103 87 103 190 10 1988 01/06 40 years

Magic China Café:

Orlando, FL

52 (o) 40 111 40 111 151 16 2001 02/04 40 years

Majestic Liquors:

Hudson Oaks, TX

361 1,029 361 1,029 1,390 125 1993 02/05 40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

611 1,609 611 1,609 2,220 196 1974 02/05 40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

988 2,368 988 2,368 3,356 289 1997 02/05 40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

1,652 2,018 1,652 2,018 3,670 246 2000 02/05 40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

2,505 2,138 2,505 2,138 4,643 261 1988 02/05 40 years

Coffee City, TX

1,330 3,858 1,330 3,858 5,188 470 1996 02/05 40 years

Granbury, TX

786 1,234 786 1,234 2,020 117 2006 05/05 (g) 40 years

Dallas, TX

1,554 1,229 1,554 1,229 2,783 140 1982 06/05 40 years

Dallas, TX

2,407 2,299 2,407 2,299 4,706 255 1971 06/05 40 years

Azle, TX

648 859 648 859 1,507 55 1970 06/07 40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

575 933 575 933 1,508 59 1982 06/07 40 years

Lubbock, TX

1,293 1,211 1,293 1,211 2,504 74 1983 07/07 40 years

Lubbock, TX

2,606 2,898 2,606 2,898 5,504 178 1983 07/07 40 years

Mattress Firm:

Baton Rouge, LA

609 914 609 914 1,523 320 1995 12/95 40 years

MC Sports:

Lapeer, MI

408 2,086 408 2,086 2,494 120 2007 10/05 40 years

Merchant’s Tires:

Washington, DC

624 578 624 578 1,202 69 1983 03/05 40 years

Rockville, MD

1,030 306 1,030 306 1,336 37 1974 03/05 40 years

Newport News, VA

234 259 234 259 493 31 1986 03/05 40 years

Hampton, VA

180 427 180 427 607 51 1986 03/05 40 years

Norfolk, VA

398 508 398 508 906 61 1986 03/05 40 years

Mi Pueblo Foods:

Palo Alto, CA

2,272 3,405 2,272 3,405 5,677 919 1998 12/98 (f) 40 years

Michaels:

Fairfax, VA

986 2,133 986 2,133 3,119 463 1995 12/95 40 years

Grapevine, TX (n)

1,018 2,067 1,018 2,067 3,085 596 1998 06/98 40 years

Plymouth Meeting, PA

2,911 2,595 2,911 2,595 5,506 629 1999 10/98 (g) 40 years

Michael’s Family Restaurant:

Sherman, TX

233 126 24 233 150 383 21 1969 09/06 20 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 11


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Mister Car Wash:

Plymouth, MN

827 182 827 182 1,009 49 1955 04/07 10 years

West St Paul, MN

836 236 836 236 1,072 32 1972 04/07 20 years

Cedar Rapids, IA

391 816 391 816 1,207 88 1989 04/07 25 years

Brooklyn Park, MN

438 778 438 778 1,216 84 1985 04/07 25 years

Roseville, MN

861 564 861 564 1,425 76 1963 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

796 678 796 678 1,474 73 1986 04/07 25 years

Edina, MN

894 687 894 687 1,581 93 1985 04/07 20 years

Eden Prairie, MN

865 751 865 751 1,616 102 1984 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

624 1,108 624 1,108 1,732 100 1988 04/07 30 years

Clive, IA

1,141 935 1,141 935 2,076 127 1983 04/07 20 years

Spokane, WA

1,253 1,146 1,253 1,146 2,399 89 1997 04/07 35 years

Humble, TX

1,204 1,517 1,204 1,517 2,721 117 1993 04/07 35 years

Houston, TX

1,347 1,702 1,347 1,702 3,049 154 1984 04/07 30 years

Houston, TX

1,960 1,145 1,960 1,145 3,105 124 1983 04/07 25 years

Houston, TX

1,846 1,592 1,846 1,592 3,438 173 1983 04/07 25 years

Houston, TX

2,260 1,806 2,260 1,806 4,066 196 1975 04/07 25 years

Anoka, MN

212 214 212 214 426 39 1968 04/07 15 years

Houston, TX

3,193 1,305 3,193 1,305 4,498 101 1995 04/07 35 years

Stillwater, MN

289 214 289 214 503 39 1971 04/07 15 years

Sugarland, TX

3,789 1,972 3,789 1,972 5,761 153 1995 04/07 35 years

St. Cloud, MN

243 391 243 391 634 53 1986 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

5,126 1,267 5,126 1,267 6,393 98 1995 04/07 35 years

Des Moines, IA

213 476 213 476 689 64 1964 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

288 466 288 466 754 84 1970 04/07 15 years

Cottage Grove, MN

274 485 274 485 759 52 1992 04/07 25 years

Spokane, WA

214 580 214 580 794 52 1990 04/07 30 years

Des Moines, IA

249 596 249 596 845 54 1990 04/07 30 years

Rochester, MN

1,055 2,327 1,055 2,327 3,382 128 2003 10/07 40 years

Rochester, MN

319 451 319 451 770 25 1994 10/07 40 years

Clearwater, FL

825 765 825 765 1,590 65 1969 11/07 25 years

Vestavia Hills, AL

1,009 956 1,009 956 1,965 81 1967 11/07 25 years

Seminole, FL

2,166 1,496 2,166 1,496 3,662 106 1985 11/07 30 years

Mesquite, TX

1,596 2,201 1,596 2,201 3,797 187 1987 11/07 25 years

Birmingham, AL

2,378 2,145 2,378 2,145 4,523 152 1985 11/07 30 years

Tampa, FL

2,993 1,669 2,993 1,669 4,662 142 1969 11/07 25 years

El Paso, TX

664 824 664 824 1,488 42 1991 12/07 40 years

El Paso, TX

988 1,046 988 1,046 2,034 54 1998 12/07 40 years

El Paso, TX

1,424 1,306 1,424 1,306 2,730 89 1986 12/07 30 years

El Paso, TX

1,399 1,468 1,399 1,468 2,867 75 1991 12/07 40 years

El Paso, TX

1,807 2,287 1,807 2,287 4,094 118 1983 12/07 40 years

Mr. E’s Music Supercenter:

Arlington, TX

435 2,300 334 435 2,634 3,069 775 1996 06/96 38 years

Muchas Gracias Mexican Restaurant:

Salem, OR

556 736 556 736 1,292 148 1996 12/01 40 years

New Covenant Church:

Augusta, GA

177 674 177 674 851 136 1998 12/01 40 years

Nitlantika:

Hollywood, FL

386 88 37 238 238 1960 12/05 15 years

Office Depot:

Arlington, TX

596 1,411 596 1,411 2,007 562 1994 01/94 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 12


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Richmond, VA

889 1,948 889 1,948 2,837 662 1996 05/96 40 years

Hartsdale, NY

4,509 2,454 4,509 2,454 6,963 346 1996 09/97 40 years

OfficeMax:

Cincinnati, OH

543 1,575 543 1,575 2,118 609 1994 07/94 40 years

Evanston, IL

1,868 1,758 1,868 1,758 3,626 640 1995 06/95 40 years

Altamonte Springs, FL

1,690 3,050 1,690 3,050 4,740 1,058 1995 01/96 40 years

Cutler Ridge, FL

989 1,479 989 1,479 2,468 500 1995 06/96 40 years

Sacramento, CA

1,144 2,961 1,144 2,961 4,105 963 1996 12/96 40 years

Salinas, CA

1,353 1,829 1,353 1,829 3,182 589 1995 02/97 40 years

Redding, CA

667 2,182 667 2,182 2,849 684 1997 06/97 40 years

Kelso, WA

868 1,806 868 1,806 2,674 540 1998 09/97 (g) 40 years

Lynchburg, VA

562 1,851 562 1,851 2,413 523 1998 02/98 40 years

Leesburg, FL

640 1,929 640 1,929 2,569 532 1998 08/98 40 years

Tigard, OR

1,540 2,247 1,540 2,247 3,787 625 1995 11/98 40 years

Griffin, GA

685 1,802 685 1,802 2,487 482 1999 11/98 (g) 40 years

Orlando Metro Gymnastics:

Orlando, FL

428 1,345 428 1,345 1,773 167 2003 01/05 40 years

Palais Royale:

Sealy, TX

457 504 1,634 462 2,134 2,596 206 1982 03/99 40 years

Patriot Fuels:

Vinita, OK

72 368 72 368 440 5 1972 07/09 20 years

Pennstar Bank:

Dallas, PA

214 345 214 345 559 75 1995 08/05 20 years

Pep Boys:

Jacksonville, FL

810 2,331 810 2,331 3,141 142 1989 11/07 35 years

Roswell, GA

931 2,732 931 2,732 3,663 194 2007 11/07 30 years

Guayama, PR

1,729 2,732 1,729 2,131 3,860 5 1998 11/07 33 years

Reading, PA

1,189 3,367 1,189 2,819 4,008 9 1989 11/07 28 years

Lansing, IL

869 3,440 869 3,440 4,309 209 1993 11/07 35 years

Quakertown, PA

1,129 3,252 1,129 3,252 4,381 197 1995 11/07 35 years

Las Vegas, NV

1,917 2,530 1,917 2,530 4,447 154 1989 11/07 35 years

Turnersville, NJ

990 3,494 990 3,494 4,484 247 1986 11/07 30 years

Chicago, IL

1,077 3,756 1,077 3,756 4,833 228 1993 11/07 35 years

Marietta, GA

1,311 3,556 1,311 3,556 4,867 252 1987 11/07 30 years

Cicero, IL

1,341 3,760 1,341 3,760 5,101 228 1993 11/07 35 years

Philadelphia, PA

1,300 3,830 1,300 3,830 5,130 233 1995 11/07 35 years

Cornwell Heights, PA

2,058 3,102 2,058 3,102 5,160 264 1972 11/07 25 years

Joliet, IL

1,506 3,727 1,506 3,727 5,233 226 1993 11/07 35 years

Marlton, NJ

1,608 4,142 1,608 4,142 5,750 293 1983 11/07 30 years

East Brunswick, NJ

2,449 5,026 2,449 5,026 7,475 356 1987 11/07 30 years

Perkins Restaurant:

Des Moines, IA

256 136 256 136 392 62 1976 06/05 10 years

Des Moines, IA

226 203 226 203 429 92 1976 06/05 10 years

Des Moines, IA

270 218 270 218 488 99 1977 06/05 10 years

Newton, IA

354 402 354 402 756 182 1979 06/05 10 years

Urbandale, IA

377 581 377 581 958 132 1979 06/05 20 years

Pet Paradise:

Houston, TX

417 2,306 417 2,306 2,723 103 2008 03/08 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 13


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Bunnell, FL

316 881 316 881 1,197 38 1997 04/08 40 years

Houston, TX

535 3,426 535 3,426 3,961 61 2009 09/08 (m) 40 years

Charlotte, NC

825 3,231 825 3,231 4,056 37 2009 11/08 (m) 40 years

Davie, FL

1,138 1,069 1,138 1,069 2,207 32 2003 12/08 35 years

Petco:

Grand Forks, ND

307 910 307 910 1,217 274 1996 12/97 40 years

Petro Express:

Charlotte, NC

1,025 1,605 1,025 1,605 2,630 145 1986 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

507 698 507 698 1,205 95 1967 04/07 20 years

Lincolnton, NC

723 532 723 532 1,255 48 1989 04/07 30 years

Mineral Springs, NC

678 577 678 577 1,255 39 2002 04/07 40 years

Monroe, NC

421 834 421 834 1,255 65 1997 04/07 35 years

Waxhaw, NC

508 747 508 747 1,255 51 2002 04/07 40 years

Rock Hill, SC

778 727 778 727 1,505 66 1990 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

629 876 629 876 1,505 79 1986 04/07 30 years

Gastonia, NC

745 760 745 760 1,505 51 2003 04/07 40 years

Monroe, NC

709 796 709 796 1,505 62 1999 04/07 35 years

Monroe, NC

857 1,023 857 1,023 1,880 69 2004 04/07 40 years

Conover, NC

917 1,275 917 1,275 2,192 99 1999 04/07 35 years

Gastonia, NC

965 1,228 965 1,228 2,193 95 2001 04/07 35 years

Kings Mountain, NC

1,210 982 1,210 982 2,192 76 1988 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,323 870 1,323 870 2,193 79 1982 04/07 30 years

Gastonia, NC

1,070 1,185 1,070 1,185 2,255 92 1990 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,037 1,468 1,037 1,468 2,505 114 1997 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,030 1,725 1,030 1,725 2,755 156 1983 04/07 30 years

Thomasville, NC

994 1,761 994 1,761 2,755 136 2000 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,258 1,560 1,258 1,560 2,818 106 2004 04/07 40 years

Matthews, NC

1,197 1,746 1,197 1,746 2,943 158 1987 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

1,340 1,790 1,340 1,790 3,130 139 1998 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,293 1,837 1,293 1,837 3,130 166 1987 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

1,291 1,839 1,291 1,839 3,130 166 1988 04/07 30 years

Belmont, NC

1,508 1,622 1,508 1,622 3,130 126 2001 04/07 35 years

Lake Wylie, SC

1,972 1,283 1,972 1,283 3,255 99 2003 04/07 35 years

Fort Mill, SC

1,883 1,559 1,883 1,559 3,442 141 1988 04/07 30 years

Lake Wylie, SC

1,381 2,061 1,381 2,061 3,442 160 1998 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,458 2,047 1,458 2,047 3,505 185 1987 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

1,532 1,973 1,532 1,973 3,505 153 1998 04/07 35 years

Hickory, NC

1,975 1,530 1,975 1,530 3,505 118 2002 04/07 35 years

Concord, NC

1,828 1,677 1,828 1,677 3,505 130 2002 04/07 35 years

York, SC

2,306 1,449 2,306 1,449 3,755 112 1999 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,778 1,977 1,778 1,977 3,755 178 1992 04/07 30 years

Rock Hill, SC

2,119 1,886 2,119 1,886 4,005 146 1998 04/07 35 years

Statesville, NC

1,886 2,182 1,886 2,182 4,068 169 1999 04/07 35 years

Denver, NC

2,317 1,750 2,317 1,750 4,067 135 1999 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,697 2,419 1,697 2,419 4,116 164 2005 04/07 40 years

Charlotte, NC

2,165 1,965 2,165 1,965 4,130 152 1997 04/07 35 years

Concord, NC

2,144 1,986 2,144 1,986 4,130 154 2000 04/07 35 years

Lincolnton, NC

2,359 1,771 2,359 1,771 4,130 137 2000 04/07 35 years

Cornelius, NC

1,653 2,664 1,653 2,664 4,317 206 2000 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

1,810 2,570 1,810 2,570 4,380 174 2004 04/07 40 years

Charlotte, NC

2,316 2,064 2,316 2,064 4,380 160 1996 04/07 35 years

Rock Hill, SC

3,095 1,910 3,095 1,910 5,005 148 1999 04/07 35 years

Fort Mill, SC

3,825 2,554 3,825 2,554 6,379 198 1998 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

2,784 3,720 2,784 3,720 6,504 288 1998 04/07 35 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 14


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Charlotte, NC

429 425 429 425 854 38 1983 04/07 30 years

Gastonia, NC

335 545 335 545 880 37 2000 04/07 40 years

Charlotte, NC

1,231 1,214 1,231 1,214 2,445 80 1997 05/07 40 years

Charlotte, NC

1,849 2,280 1,849 2,280 4,129 150 2005 05/07 40 years

Rock Hill, SC

3,108 2,146 3,108 2,146 5,254 141 1999 05/07 40 years

PetSmart:

Chicago, IL

2,724 3,566 2,724 3,566 6,290 1,007 1998 09/98 40 years

Pier I Imports:

Anchorage, AK

928 1,663 928 1,663 2,591 575 1995 02/96 40 years

Memphis, TN

713 822 713 822 1,535 258 1997 09/96 (f) 40 years

Sanford, FL

738 803 738 803 1,541 237 1998 06/97 (f) 40 years

Harlingen, TX

317 756 317 756 1,073 193 1999 11/98 (f) 40 years

Valdosta, GA

391 806 391 806 1,197 204 1999 01/99 (f) 40 years

Pizza Hut:

Monroeville, AL

547 44 547 44 591 9 1976 12/01 40 years

Popeye’s:

Snellville, GA

642 437 642 437 1,079 88 1995 12/01 40 years

Pueblo Viejo Restaurant:

Chandler, AZ

655 791 655 791 1,446 162 1997 12/01 40 years

Pull-A-Part:

Augusta, GA

1,414 1,451 1,414 1,451 2,865 92 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years

Norcross, GA

1,831 1,040 1,831 1,040 2,871 88 1998 08/06 40 years

Conley, GA

1,686 1,387 1,686 1,387 3,073 117 1999 08/06 40 years

Birmingham, AL

1,165 2,090 1,165 2,090 3,255 176 1964 08/06 40 years

Knoxville, TN

961 2,384 961 2,384 3,345 147 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years

Nashville, TN

2,164 1,414 2,164 1,414 3,578 119 2006 08/06 40 years

Charlotte, NC

2,913 1,724 2,913 1,724 4,637 145 2006 08/06 40 years

Louisville, KY

3,206 1,532 3,206 1,532 4,738 129 2006 08/06 40 years

Harvey, LA

1,887 4,326 1,887 4,326 6,213 158 2008 08/06 (m) 40 years

Lafayette, LA

1,036 2,226 1,036 2,226 3,262 114 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years

Cleveland, OH

4,556 2,096 4,556 2,096 6,652 111 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years

Montgomery, AL

934 2,013 934 2,013 2,947 107 2007 11/06 (m) 40 years

Jackson, MS

1,315 2,471 1,315 2,471 3,786 100 2008 12/06 (m) 40 years

Baton Rouge, LA

893 3,256 893 3,256 4,149 64 2009 01/07 (m) 40 years

Memphis, TN

1,779 2,964 1,779 2,964 4,743 120 2008 05/07 (m) 40 years

Mobile, AL

550 2,772 550 2,772 3,322 66 2009 06/07 (m) 40 years

Winston-Salem, NC

846 2,449 846 2,449 3,295 64 2009 08/07 (m) 40 years

Lithonia, GA

2,410 2,345 2,410 2,345 4,755 56 2009 08/07 (m) 40 years

Columbia, SC

935 2,178 935 2,178 3,113 52 2009 09/07 (m) 40 years

Akron, OH

1,065 1,869 1,065 1,869 2,934 6 2009 10/08 (m) 40 years

QuikTrip:

Des Moines, IA

259 792 259 792 1,051 120 1996 06/05 30 years

Urbandale, IA

340 764 340 764 1,104 87 1993 06/05 40 years

Norcross, GA

844 297 839 297 1,136 45 1994 06/05 30 years

Norcross, GA

966 202 966 202 1,168 31 1993 06/05 30 years

Clive, IA

623 557 623 557 1,180 84 1994 06/05 30 years

Norcross, GA

948 294 948 294 1,242 44 1989 06/05 30 years

Gainesville, GA

592 913 592 913 1,505 138 1989 06/05 30 years

Woodstock, GA

488 1,042 488 1,042 1,530 118 1997 06/05 40 years

Lee’s Summit, MO

374 1,224 374 1,224 1,598 139 1999 06/05 40 years

Alpharetta, GA

1,048 607 1,048 607 1,655 69 1996 06/05 40 years

Tulsa, OK

1,225 650 1,225 650 1,875 98 1990 06/05 30 years

Olathe, KS

793 1,392 793 1,392 2,185 158 1999 06/05 40 years

Herculaneum, MO

856 1,613 856 1,613 2,469 244 1991 06/05 30 years

Wichita, KS

118 454 113 454 567 69 1989 06/05 30 years

Wichita, KS

127 543 127 543 670 82 1990 06/05 30 years

Johnston, IA

394 385 394 385 779 58 1991 06/05 30 years

Des Moines, IA

379 455 379 455 834 69 1990 06/05 30 years

Quizno’s:

Lapeer, MI

29 211 29 211 240 13 2007 10/05 40 years

Qwest Corporation Service Center:

Decorah, IA

72 272 72 272 344 123 1974 06/05 10 years

Cedar Rapids, IA

184 629 184 629 813 143 1976 06/05 20 years

Rallys:

Toledo, OH

126 320 126 320 446 144 1989 07/92 39 years

REB Oil:

Deerfield Beach, FL

770 274 770 274 1,044 28 1980 12/05 40 years

Lake Placid, FL

2,532 1,157 491 2,532 1,648 4,180 136 1990 12/05 40 years

Reliable Life Insurance:

St. Louis, MO

2,078 13,762 2,076 13,762 15,838 1,881 1975 05/04 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 15


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Retail Operations: (h)

Ventura, CA

5,590 4,431 5,590 4,431 10,021 200 2001 03/08 40 years

Ventura, CA

6,253 4,560 6,253 4,560 10,813 235 1994 03/08 35 years

Bakersfield, CA

2,099 2,011 1,759 1,759 93 1990 03/08 35 years

Bakersfield, CA

3,303 3,845 1,978 1,978 268 1975 03/08 25 years

Bakersfield, CA

2,798 5,260 2,044 2,044 263 1997 03/08 35 years

Bakersfield, CA

2,043 3,520 2,043 680 2,723 195 1988 03/08 30 years

Bakersfield, CA

1,643 1,959 530 530 137 1975 03/08 25 years

Bakersfield, CA

3,363 3,288 3,363 3,288 6,651 147 2002 03/08 40 years

Bakersfield, CA

2,564 4,465 2,564 4,465 7,029 264 1988 03/08 30 years

Bakersfield, CA

3,664 3,709 3,664 3,709 7,373 190 1994 03/08 35 years

San Fernando, CA

6,630 2,706 6,630 2,706 9,336 167 1988 03/08 30 years

Bakersfield, CA

3,346 6,016 3,346 6,016 9,362 305 1998 03/08 35 years

Rite Aid:

Douglasville, GA

413 995 413 995 1,408 346 1996 01/96 40 years

Conyers, GA

575 999 575 999 1,574 313 1997 06/97 40 years

Augusta, GA

569 1,327 502 1,327 1,829 399 1997 12/97 40 years

Riverdale, GA

1,089 1,707 1,089 1,707 2,796 514 1997 12/97 40 years

Warner Robins, GA

707 1,227 707 1,227 1,934 336 1999 03/98 (g) 40 years

Mobile, AL

1,137 1,694 1,137 1,694 2,831 341 2000 12/01 40 years

Orange Beach, AL

1,410 1,996 1,410 1,996 3,406 401 2000 12/01 40 years

West Mifflin, PA

1,402 2,044 1,402 2,044 3,446 402 1999 02/02 40 years

Norfolk, VA

2,742 1,797 2,742 1,797 4,539 354 2001 02/02 40 years

Thorndale, PA

2,261 2,472 2,261 2,472 4,733 487 2001 02/02 40 years

Saratoga Springs, NY

762 591 762 591 1,353 78 1993 09/04 40 years

Albany, NY (n)

34 824 34 824 858 109 1992 09/04 40 years

Hudson Falls, NY

57 780 39 57 819 876 106 1990 09/04 40 years

Albany, NY

25 867 25 867 892 115 1994 09/04 40 years

Monticello, NY

706 664 769 664 769 1,433 92 1996 03/05 40 years

Rite Rug:

Columbus, OH

1,596 934 13 1,605 939 2,544 120 1970 11/04 40 years

Road Ranger:

Springfield, IL

705 1,500 705 1,500 2,205 133 1997 06/06 40 years

Rockford, IL

623 1,331 623 1,331 1,954 118 2000 06/06 40 years

Belvidere, IL

748 1,256 748 1,256 2,004 111 1997 06/06 40 years

Decatur, IL

815 1,314 815 1,314 2,129 116 2002 06/06 40 years

Mendota, IL

959 1,296 959 1,296 2,255 115 1996 06/06 40 years

Dekalb, IL

747 1,658 747 1,658 2,405 147 2000 06/06 40 years

Rockford, IL

1,094 1,662 1,094 1,662 2,756 147 1996 06/06 40 years

Brazil, IN

2,199 907 2,199 907 3,106 80 1990 06/06 40 years

Cherry Valley, IL

1,409 1,897 1,409 1,897 3,306 168 1991 06/06 40 years

Oakdale, WI

1,844 1,663 1,844 1,663 3,507 147 1998 06/06 40 years

Springfield, IL

1,795 1,863 1,795 1,863 3,658 165 1978 06/06 40 years

Cottage Grove, WI

2,175 1,733 2,175 1,733 3,908 153 1990 06/06 40 years

Elk Run Heights, IA

1,538 2,470 1,538 2,470 4,008 219 1989 06/06 40 years

Lake Station, IN

3,172 1,112 3,172 1,112 4,284 98 1987 06/06 40 years

DeKalb, IL

505 1,503 505 1,503 2,008 108 2004 02/07 40 years

Princeton, IL

1,141 3,066 1,141 3,066 4,207 220 2003 02/07 40 years

Hampshire, IL

1,307 1,501 1,629 1,307 3,130 4,437 193 1988 02/07 (f) 40 years

Fenton, MO

2,584 2,622 2,584 2,622 5,206 188 2007 02/07 40 years

Champaign, IL

3,241 2,008 3,241 2,008 5,249 144 2006 02/07 40 years

South Beloit, IL

3,824 2,309 3,824 2,309 6,133 166 2002 02/07 40 years

Marion, IA

737 1,071 737 1,071 1,808 75 1974 03/07 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 16


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Cedar Rapids, IA

1,025 984 1,025 984 2,009 69 1990 03/07 40 years

Okawville, IL

930 1,147 930 1,147 2,077 68 1997 08/07 40 years

Dubuque, IA

561 1,941 561 1,941 2,502 111 2000 09/07 40 years

Belvidere, IL

521 1,053 521 1,053 1,574 56 2008 09/07 (f) 40 years

South Beloit, IL

1,182 1,324 1,182 1,324 2,506 70 2008 09/07 (f) 40 years

Florence, KY

615 1,242 615 1,242 1,857 61 1990 04/08 35 years

Covington, KY

486 1,420 486 1,420 1,906 69 1996 04/08 35 years

Alexandria, KY

624 1,306 624 1,306 1,930 64 1993 04/08 35 years

Florence, KY

741 1,272 741 1,272 2,013 62 1994 04/08 35 years

Florence, KY

884 1,557 884 1,557 2,441 76 1995 04/08 35 years

Dry Ridge, KY

892 1,946 892 1,946 2,838 111 1973 04/08 30 years

Wilder, KY

954 1,902 954 1,902 2,856 93 1994 04/08 35 years

Hebron, KY

1,522 2,984 1,522 2,984 4,506 146 1996 04/08 35 years

Robb & Stucky:

Ft. Myers, FL

2,188 6,225 2,188 6,225 8,413 1,895 1997 12/97 40 years

Roger & Marv’s:

Kenosha, WI

1,918 3,431 1,918 3,431 5,349 1,100 1992 02/97 40 years

Roni Deutch Tax Services:

Hollywood, FL

202 46 19 123 123 1960 12/05 15 years

Ross Dress for Less:

Coral Gables, FL

1,782 1,661 1,782 1,661 3,443 513 1994 06/96 38 years

Lodi, CA

614 1,415 614 1,415 2,029 220 1984 03/99 40 years

Rue 21:

Lapeer, MI

126 645 126 645 771 37 2007 10/05 40 years

Sally Beauty Supply:

Lapeer, MI

33 167 33 167 200 10 2007 10/05 40 years

Schlotzsky’s Deli:

Phoenix, AZ

706 315 706 315 1,021 63 1995 12/01 40 years

Scottsdale, AZ

717 311 717 311 1,028 62 1995 12/01 40 years

Season’s 52:

Schaumburg, IL

2,065 1,311 2,065 1,311 3,376 264 1998 12/01 40 years

Shek’s Chinese Express:

Eden Prairie, MN

65 261 65 261 326 50 1997 12/01 40 years

Shoes on a Shoestring:

Albuquerque, NM

1,442 2,335 1,442 2,335 3,777 732 1997 06/97 40 years

Shop ‘n Save:

Homestead, PA

1,139 2,158 (j) 1,139 2,158 3,297 305 1994 02/97 31 years

Shop-a-Snak:

Chelsea, AL

391 628 391 628 1,019 57 1981 05/06 40 years

Jasper, AL

551 747 551 747 1,298 68 1998 05/06 40 years

Bessemer, AL

564 742 564 742 1,306 67 2002 05/06 40 years

Birmingham, AL

361 744 361 744 1,105 67 1989 05/06 40 years

Hoover, AL

446 672 446 672 1,118 61 1989 05/06 40 years

Tuscaloosa, AL

386 733 386 733 1,119 66 1991 05/06 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 17


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Homewood, AL

468 657 468 657 1,125 60 1990 05/06 40 years

Birmingham, AL

439 704 439 704 1,143 64 1989 05/06 40 years

Birmingham, AL

490 769 490 769 1,259 70 1992 05/06 40 years

Hoover, AL

713 865 713 865 1,578 78 1998 05/06 40 years

Hoover, AL

764 1,157 663 1,157 1,820 105 2005 05/06 40 years

Trussville, AL

272 542 272 542 814 49 1992 05/06 40 years

Tuscaloosa, AL

525 463 525 463 988 42 1991 05/06 40 years

Tuscaloosa, AL

432 559 432 559 991 51 1991 05/06 40 years

SOAKS Express Wash:

Ankeny, IA

662 662 (e ) 662 (e ) (e ) 06/05 (e )

Sonic Automotive:

Charlotte, NC

3,619 4,854 3,619 4,854 8,473 319 1996 05/07 40 years

Spec’s Liquor and Fine Foods:

Corpus Christi, TX

777 918 542 777 1,460 2,237 366 1967 11/93 40 years

Spencer’s Air Conditioning & Appliance:

Glendale, AZ

342 982 342 982 1,324 256 1999 12/98 (g) 40 years

Sports Authority:

Tampa, FL

2,128 1,522 2,128 1,522 3,650 514 1994 06/96 40 years

Sarasota, FL

1,428 1,703 1,428 1,703 3,131 252 1996 09/97 40 years

Memphis, TN (n)

820 2,573 820 2,573 3,393 721 1998 12/97 (g) 40 years

Little Rock, AR

3,113 2,660 3,113 2,660 5,773 751 1997 09/98 40 years

Iselin, NJ

3,750 5,983 3,750 5,983 9,733 1,041 1994 01/03 40 years

Stone Mountain Chevrolet:

Lilburn, GA

3,027 4,685 3,027 4,685 7,712 630 2004 08/04 40 years

Stop N Go:

Kennedale, TX

400 692 391 692 1,083 139 1985 12/01 40 years

Grand Prairie, TX

421 685 421 685 1,106 138 1986 12/01 40 years

Stripes:

Laredo, TX

841 739 841 739 1,580 75 2001 12/05 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

440 751 440 751 1,191 76 1984 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

675 533 675 533 1,208 54 1993 12/05 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

484 828 484 828 1,312 84 1983 12/05 40 years

Harlingen, TX

755 601 755 601 1,356 61 1987 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

736 670 736 670 1,406 68 1984 12/05 40 years

Portland, TX

656 915 656 915 1,571 92 1983 12/05 40 years

Pharr, TX

784 805 784 805 1,589 81 2000 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

933 699 933 699 1,632 71 1999 12/05 40 years

Lawton, OK

697 964 697 964 1,661 97 1984 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

703 1,037 703 1,037 1,740 105 1986 12/05 40 years

Harlingen, TX

906 953 906 953 1,859 96 1991 12/05 40 years

McAllen, TX

987 893 987 893 1,880 90 1999 12/05 40 years

Harlingen, TX

754 1,152 754 1,152 1,906 116 1999 12/05 40 years

George West, TX

1,243 695 1,243 695 1,938 70 1996 12/05 40 years

Mission, TX

880 1,101 880 1,101 1,981 111 1999 12/05 40 years

McAllen, TX

975 1,030 975 1,030 2,005 104 2003 12/05 40 years

Donna, TX

1,004 1,127 1,004 1,127 2,131 114 1995 12/05 40 years

Pharr, TX

982 1,178 982 1,178 2,160 119 1988 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

1,039 1,145 1,039 1,145 2,184 116 2004 12/05 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 18


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

La Feria, TX

900 1,347 900 1,347 2,247 136 1988 12/05 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

905 1,351 905 1,351 2,256 136 2000 12/05 40 years

Edinburg, TX

970 1,286 970 1,286 2,256 130 2003 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

853 1,416 853 1,416 2,269 143 2005 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

1,182 1,105 1,182 1,105 2,287 112 2000 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

1,279 1,015 1,279 1,015 2,294 103 1990 12/05 40 years

San Juan, TX

1,124 1,172 1,124 1,172 2,296 118 1996 12/05 40 years

Freer, TX

1,151 1,158 1,151 1,158 2,309 117 1984 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

1,015 1,308 1,015 1,308 2,323 132 2003 12/05 40 years

Mission, TX

1,125 1,213 1,125 1,213 2,338 123 2003 12/05 40 years

San Benito, TX

791 1,857 791 1,857 2,648 188 1994 12/05 40 years

San Benito, TX

1,103 1,586 1,103 1,586 2,689 160 2005 12/05 40 years

South Padre Island, TX

1,367 1,389 1,367 1,389 2,756 140 1988 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

1,385 1,419 1,385 1,419 2,804 143 1982 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

1,392 1,444 1,392 1,444 2,836 146 2005 12/05 40 years

Los Indios, TX

1,387 1,457 1,387 1,457 2,844 147 2005 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

1,495 1,400 1,495 1,400 2,895 142 1993 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

1,400 1,531 1,400 1,531 2,931 155 1984 12/05 40 years

Edinburg, TX

1,317 1,624 1,317 1,624 2,941 164 1999 12/05 40 years

San Juan, TX

1,424 1,546 1,424 1,546 2,970 156 2004 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

1,843 1,419 1,843 1,419 3,262 143 2000 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

2,033 1,288 2,033 1,288 3,321 130 1995 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

1,553 1,775 1,553 1,775 3,328 179 2000 12/05 40 years

Port Isabel, TX

2,062 1,299 2,062 1,299 3,361 131 1994 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

1,308 2,151 1,308 2,151 3,459 217 1995 12/05 40 years

Progreso, TX

1,769 1,811 1,769 1,811 3,580 183 1999 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

2,530 1,125 2,530 1,125 3,655 114 1990 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

2,417 1,828 2,417 1,828 4,245 185 2000 12/05 40 years

Pharr, TX

2,426 1,881 2,426 1,881 4,307 190 2003 12/05 40 years

Riviera, TX

2,351 2,158 2,351 2,158 4,509 218 2005 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

2,915 1,800 2,915 1,800 4,715 182 2000 12/05 40 years

Olmito, TX

3,688 2,880 3,688 2,880 6,568 291 2002 12/05 40 years

Falfurias, TX

4,244 4,458 4,213 4,458 8,671 450 2002 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

459 460 459 460 919 46 1983 12/05 40 years

Palmview, TX

835 1,372 835 1,372 2,207 110 2005 10/06 40 years

San Juan, TX

816 1,434 816 1,434 2,250 109 2006 12/06 40 years

Harlingen, TX

638 1,807 638 1,807 2,445 137 2006 12/06 40 years

Zapata, TX

1,333 1,773 1,333 1,773 3,106 135 2006 12/06 40 years

Rio Grande City, TX

1,871 1,612 1,871 1,612 3,483 123 2006 12/06 40 years

Orange Grove, TX

1,767 1,838 1,767 1,838 3,605 124 2007 04/07 40 years

Laredo, TX

448 734 448 734 1,182 52 1981 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

468 728 468 728 1,196 52 1973 11/07 30 years

Harlingen, TX

408 826 408 826 1,234 58 1982 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

348 1,168 348 1,168 1,516 83 1983 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

584 958 584 958 1,542 68 1981 11/07 30 years

San Benito, TX

420 1,135 420 1,135 1,555 80 1985 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

698 1,169 698 1,169 1,867 83 1981 11/07 30 years

Kerrville, TX

640 1,616 640 1,616 2,256 86 1996 11/07 40 years

Del Rio, TX

1,565 758 1,565 758 2,323 40 1996 11/07 40 years

Monahans, TX

2,628 2,973 2,628 2,973 5,601 158 1996 11/07 40 years

Odessa, TX

2,633 3,199 2,633 3,199 5,832 170 2006 11/07 40 years

San Angelo, TX

194 471 194 471 665 25 1998 11/07 40 years

Pharr, TX

573 1,229 573 1,229 1,802 63 2000 12/07 40 years

Harlingen, TX

277 808 277 808 1,085 53 1983 01/08 30 years

Laredo, TX

325 816 325 816 1,141 53 1983 01/08 30 years

Port Isabel, TX

299 855 299 855 1,154 56 1983 01/08 30 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 19


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Harlingen, TX

329 935 329 935 1,264 61 1980 01/08 30 years

McAllen, TX

643 1,776 643 1,776 2,419 116 1980 01/08 30 years

Brownsville, TX

843 1,429 843 1,429 2,272 58 2007 05/08 40 years

Laredo, TX

879 1,593 879 1,593 2,472 65 2007 05/08 40 years

Edinburg, TX

834 1,787 834 1,787 2,621 73 2007 05/08 40 years

La Villa, TX

710 2,166 710 2,166 2,876 88 2007 05/08 40 years

Laredo, TX

1,183 1,934 1,183 1,934 3,117 79 2007 05/08 40 years

McAllen, TX

1,270 2,383 1,270 2,383 3,653 129 1986 05/08 30 years

Houston, TX

696 1,458 696 1,458 2,154 38 2008 12/08 40 years

Lubbock, TX

671 1,612 671 1,612 2,283 42 2007 12/08 40 years

Subway:

Eden Prairie, MN

54 150 67 54 218 272 41 1997 12/01 40 years

Cohoes, NY

22 116 1 22 117 139 15 1994 09/04 40 years

Albany, NY

3 67 3 67 70 9 1992 09/04 40 years

Sunshine Energy:

Kansas City, MO

517 720 532 720 1,252 13 1993 07/09 25 years

Neosho, MO

352 352 (c ) 352 (c ) 1992 07/09 (c )

Supervalu:

Huntington, WV

1,254 761 1,254 761 2,015 245 1971 02/97 40 years

Maple Heights, OH

1,035 2,874 1,035 2,874 3,909 925 1985 02/97 40 years

Susser:

Corpus Christi, TX

630 3,131 630 3,131 3,761 845 1983 03/99 40 years

Swansea Quick Cash:

Swansea, IL

46 132 46 132 178 27 1997 12/01 40 years

Taco Bell:

Ocala, FL

275 755 275 755 1,030 152 2001 12/01 40 years

Ormond Beach, FL

632 526 632 526 1,158 106 2001 12/01 40 years

Phoenix, AZ

594 283 594 283 877 57 1995 12/01 40 years

Evansville, IN

221 828 221 828 1,049 75 2003 05/06 40 years

Indianapolis, IN

547 703 547 703 1,250 64 2004 05/06 40 years

Vincennes, IN

502 880 502 880 1,382 80 2004 05/06 40 years

Fishers, IN

990 486 990 486 1,476 44 1998 05/06 40 years

Evansville, IN

308 1,301 308 1,301 1,609 118 2000 05/06 40 years

Greensburg, IN

648 1,079 648 1,079 1,727 98 1998 05/06 40 years

Bedford, IN

797 937 797 937 1,734 85 1989 05/06 40 years

Speedway, IN

408 1,426 408 1,426 1,834 129 2003 05/06 40 years

Madisonville, KY

682 1,193 682 1,193 1,875 108 1999 05/06 40 years

Columbus, IN

690 1,213 690 1,213 1,903 110 2005 05/06 40 years

Ownesboro, KY

639 1,326 639 1,326 1,965 120 2005 05/06 40 years

Evansville, IN

524 1,815 524 1,815 2,339 164 2005 05/06 40 years

Shelbyville, IN

670 1,756 670 1,756 2,426 159 1998 05/06 40 years

Indianapolis, IN

1,032 1,650 1,032 1,650 2,682 150 2004 05/06 40 years

Terre Haute, IN

1,037 1,656 1,037 1,656 2,693 150 2003 05/06 40 years

Columbus, IN

1,257 2,055 1,257 2,055 3,312 186 1990 05/06 40 years

Terre Haute, IN

1,314 2,249 1,314 2,249 3,563 204 2003 05/06 40 years

Taverna Greek Grill:

Farmington, NM

2,757 730 2,757 730 3,487 30 2003 12/07 (m) 40 years

Texas Roadhouse:

Grand Junction, CO

584 920 584 920 1,504 185 1997 12/01 40 years

Thornton, CO

599 1,019 599 1,019 1,618 205 1998 12/01 40 years

TGI Friday’s:

Corpus Christi, TX

1,210 1,532 1,210 1,532 2,742 308 1995 12/01 40 years

Third Federal Savings:

Parma, OH

370 238 1,100 370 1,338 1,708 58 1977 09/06 20 years

Thomasville:

Buford, GA

1,267 2,406 1,267 2,406 3,673 328 2004 07/04 40 years

Three Monkeys:

Columbus, OH

1,032 1,107 1,032 1,107 2,139 223 1998 12/01 40 years

TitleMax:

Aiken, SC

442 646 442 646 1,088 30 1989 08/08 30 years

Riverdale, GA

877 400 877 400 1,277 22 1978 08/08 25 years

Hueytown, AL

135 93 135 93 228 13 1948 08/08 10 years

Sylacauga, AL

94 191 94 191 285 9 1986 08/08 30 years

Fairfield, AL

133 178 133 178 311 10 1974 08/08 25 years

Darlington, SC

47 267 47 267 314 15 1973 08/08 25 years

Montgomery, AL

96 233 96 233 329 13 1970 08/08 25 years

Memphis, TN

111 237 111 237 348 11 1981 08/08 30 years

Springfield, MO

125 230 125 230 355 13 1979 08/08 25 years

Lewisburg, TN

70 298 70 298 368 12 1998 08/08 35 years

Macon, GA

103 290 103 290 393 20 1967 08/08 20 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 20


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Cheraw, SC

88 330 88 330 418 18 1976 08/08 25 years

Pulaski, TN

109 361 109 361 470 17 1986 08/08 30 years

Berkeley, MO

237 282 237 282 519 19 1961 08/08 20 years

Dalton, GA

178 347 178 347 525 19 1972 08/08 25 years

Columbia, SC

212 319 212 319 531 15 1987 08/08 30 years

St. Louis, MO

134 398 134 398 532 16 1993 08/08 35 years

St. Louis, MO

244 288 244 288 532 16 1971 08/08 25 years

Nashville, TN

268 276 268 276 544 15 1978 08/08 25 years

Nashville, TN

256 301 256 301 557 14 1982 08/08 30 years

Marietta, GA

285 278 285 278 563 19 1967 08/08 20 years

Anniston, AL

160 453 160 453 613 16 2008 08/08 40 years

Springfield, MO

220 400 220 400 620 22 1979 08/08 25 years

Gadsden, AL

250 389 250 389 639 13 2007 08/08 40 years

Memphis, TN

226 444 226 444 670 20 1986 08/08 30 years

Taylors, SC

299 372 299 372 671 15 1999 08/08 35 years

Lawrenceville, GA

370 332 370 332 702 15 1986 08/08 30 years

Norcross, GA

599 350 599 350 949 19 1975 08/08 25 years

Snellville, GA

565 396 565 396 961 22 1977 08/08 25 years

Jonesboro, GA

675 292 675 292 967 16 1970 08/08 25 years

Top’s:

Lacey, WA

2,777 7,082 2,777 7,082 9,859 2,280 1992 02/97 40 years

Tractor Supply Co.:

Aransas Pass, TX

101 1,399 200 100 1,599 1,699 388 1983 03/99 40 years

Tully’s:

Cheektowaga, NY

689 386 689 386 1,075 78 1994 12/01 40 years

Ultra Car Wash:

Mobile, AL

1,071 1,086 1,071 1,086 2,157 64 2005 08/07 40 years

Lilburn, GA

1,396 1,119 1,396 1,119 2,515 45 2004 05/08 40 years

Uni-Mart:

Williamsport, PA

909 122 909 122 1,031 27 1950 08/05 20 years

Hazleton, PA

670 377 670 377 1,047 83 1974 08/05 20 years

Chambersburg, PA

76 197 76 197 273 43 1990 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA

876 1,957 876 1,957 2,833 428 1998 08/05 20 years

Bear Creek, PA

191 230 191 230 421 50 1980 08/05 20 years

Shippensburg, PA

204 330 204 330 534 72 1989 08/05 20 years

Larksville, PA

246 334 246 334 580 73 1990 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA

171 422 171 422 593 92 1999 08/05 20 years

Ridgway, PA

382 259 382 259 641 57 1975 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA

178 471 178 471 649 103 1989 08/05 20 years

St Clair, PA

212 475 212 475 687 104 1984 08/05 20 years

Taylor, PA

181 527 181 527 708 115 1973 08/05 20 years

Bloomsburg, PA

206 501 206 501 707 110 1981 08/05 20 years

Avis, PA

392 326 392 326 718 71 1976 08/05 20 years

Punxsutawney, PA

253 542 253 542 795 119 1983 08/05 20 years

Coraopolis, PA (n)

476 347 476 347 823 76 1983 08/05 20 years

Shamokin, PA

324 506 324 506 830 111 1956 08/05 20 years

East Brady, PA

269 583 269 583 852 128 1987 08/05 20 years

Pleasant Gap, PA

332 593 332 593 925 130 1996 08/05 20 years

Port Vue, PA

824 118 824 118 942 26 1953 08/05 20 years

Bradford, PA

184 762 184 762 946 167 1983 08/05 20 years

Mountaintop, PA

423 616 423 616 1,039 132 1987 09/05 20 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 21


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Ashland, PA

355 545 355 545 900 117 1977 09/05 20 years

Bear Creek, PA (n)

689 275 689 275 964 59 1980 09/05 20 years

Midway, PA

311 708 311 708 1,019 93 1990 01/06 30 years

Beech Creek, PA

477 613 477 613 1,090 61 1988 01/06 40 years

Newstead, NY

255 835 255 835 1,090 83 1990 01/06 40 years

New Florence, PA

298 812 298 812 1,110 80 1989 01/06 40 years

Mercersburg, PA

672 746 672 746 1,418 74 1988 01/06 40 years

Pittsburgh, PA

905 1,346 905 1,346 2,251 133 1967 01/06 40 years

Nuangola, PA

1,062 1,203 1,062 1,203 2,265 119 2000 01/06 40 years

Effort, PA

1,297 1,202 1,297 1,202 2,499 119 2000 01/06 40 years

Export, PA

222 215 222 215 437 21 1988 01/06 40 years

Reynoldsville, PA

113 328 113 328 441 32 1983 01/06 40 years

McSherrystown, PA

135 365 135 365 500 36 1988 01/06 40 years

Milesburg, PA

134 373 134 373 507 37 1987 01/06 40 years

Howard, PA

136 375 136 375 511 37 1987 01/06 40 years

Plains, PA

204 401 204 401 605 40 1994 01/06 40 years

Plainfield, PA

244 383 244 383 627 38 1988 01/06 40 years

Canisteo, NY

142 485 142 485 627 48 1983 01/06 40 years

Hastings, PA

199 455 199 455 654 45 1989 01/06 40 years

Nanticoke, PA

175 482 175 482 657 48 1988 01/06 40 years

Williamsport, PA

295 379 295 379 674 37 1988 01/06 40 years

Philipsburg, PA

428 269 428 269 697 27 1978 01/06 40 years

Ellwood City, PA

196 526 196 526 722 52 1987 01/06 40 years

Curwensville, PA

226 608 226 608 834 60 1983 01/06 40 years

Hughesville, PA

290 566 290 566 856 56 1977 01/06 40 years

Jersey Shore, PA

515 381 515 381 896 38 1960 01/06 40 years

Clairton, PA

215 701 215 701 916 111 1986 01/06 25 years

Leeper, PA

286 644 286 644 930 64 1987 01/06 40 years

Punxsutawney, PA

294 650 294 650 944 64 1983 01/06 40 years

Lewisberry, PA

412 534 412 534 946 53 1988 01/06 40 years

Burnham, PA

265 510 340 435 775 75 1978 07/06 20 years

Port Royal, PA

238 635 238 635 873 110 1989 07/06 20 years

United Rentals:

Carrollton, TX

478 535 478 535 1,013 67 1981 12/04 40 years

Cedar Park, TX

535 829 535 829 1,364 105 1990 12/04 40 years

Irving, TX

708 911 708 911 1,619 115 1984 12/04 40 years

Perrysburg, OH

642 1,119 642 1,119 1,761 141 1979 12/04 40 years

Oklahoma City, OK

744 1,265 744 1,265 2,009 159 1997 12/04 40 years

Plano, TX

1,030 1,148 1,030 1,148 2,178 145 1996 12/04 40 years

Temple, TX

1,160 1,360 1,160 1,360 2,520 171 1998 12/04 40 years

Clearwater, FL

1,173 1,811 1,173 1,811 2,984 228 2001 12/04 40 years

Fort Collins, CO

2,057 978 2,057 978 3,035 123 1975 12/04 40 years

La Porte, TX

1,115 2,125 1,115 2,125 3,240 268 2000 12/04 40 years

Littleton, CO

1,743 1,944 1,743 1,944 3,687 245 2002 12/04 40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

1,428 1,428 1,428 (i ) (i ) 01/05 (i )

Ft. Worth, TX

510 1,128 510 1,128 1,638 140 1997 01/05 40 years

Melbourne, FL

747 607 747 607 1,354 70 1970 05/05 40 years

United Trust Bank:

Bridgeview, IL

673 744 673 744 1,417 150 1997 12/01 40 years

Vacant Land:

Florence, AL

1,034 748 (e ) 748 (e ) (e ) 06/04 (e )

Longwood, FL

585 585 (e ) 585 (e ) (e ) 03/06 (e )

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 22


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Vacant Property:

Foothill Ranch, CA

1,456 2,505 1,456 2,505 3,961 814 1995 12/96 40 years

Sarasota, FL

1,168 1,904 219 1,168 2,122 3,290 319 1996 09/97 40 years

Knoxville, TN

467 735 467 735 1,202 201 1999 01/98 (f) 40 years

Mason, OH

594 885 594 885 1,479 233 1999 06/98 (f) 40 years

Everett, PA

226 1,160 8 226 657 883 190 1998 11/98 37 years

Aransas Pass, TX

90 1,241 89 1,241 1,330 335 1983 03/99 40 years

Sealy, TX

820 905 820 905 1,725 244 1982 03/99 40 years

Sarasota, FL

471 1,344 471 1,344 1,815 209 1983 03/99 40 years

Winfield, AL

420 1,685 420 1,685 2,105 454 1983 03/99 40 years

Southfield, MI

405 644 405 644 1,049 149 1976 12/01 40 years

Swansea, IL

92 265 92 265 357 53 1997 12/01 40 years

Eden Prairie, MN

76 211 94 76 305 381 58 1997 12/01 40 years

Mesa, AZ

153 400 113 153 513 666 81 1997 12/01 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

819 1,107 696 696 220 1982 12/01 40 years

Jacksonville, FL

987 856 794 794 170 1996 12/01 40 years

Florissant, MO

2,490 2,937 2,490 2,937 5,427 493 1996 04/03 40 years

Woodstock, GA

1,937 1,285 1,891 1,016 2,907 210 1997 05/03 40 years

Orlando, FL

52 (o) 40 111 40 111 151 16 2001 02/04 40 years

Cohoes, NY

27 145 1 27 146 173 19 1994 09/04 40 years

Cohoes, NY

48 275 3 48 278 326 37 1994 09/04 40 years

Ticonderoga, NY

89 689 89 689 778 91 1993 09/04 40 years

Gastonia, NC

2,548 3,880 2,548 3,880 6,428 489 2004 12/04 40 years

Olean, NY

40 259 40 259 299 57 1990 08/05 20 years

Lapeer, MI

100 721 100 721 821 43 2007 10/05 40 years

Lafayette, LA

603 1,149 603 1,149 1,752 116 1999 12/05 40 years

Hollywood, FL

417 184 417 103 520 1 1961 12/05 10 years

Warriors Mark, PA

148 405 148 405 553 40 1995 01/06 40 years

Ridgeland, MS

779 933 779 933 1,712 94 1997 08/06 40 years

Montgomery, AL

593 1,187 593 1,187 1,780 120 1998 08/06 40 years

Houston, TX

422 1,915 422 1,915 2,337 193 1995 08/06 40 years

Houston, TX

112 509 112 509 621 52 1995 08/06 40 years

Tulsa, OK

325 314 325 314 639 52 1978 09/06 20 years

Hillman, MI

167 823 167 363 530 64 1952 10/06 40 years

Tucson, AZ

996 2,742 996 2,742 3,738 157 2007 12/06 (m) 40 years

Aurora, CO

5,076 13,874 38 5,076 13,912 18,988 940 1986 04/07 40 years

Independence, MO

1,838 1,534 1,838 1,534 3,372 101 1988 05/07 40 years

Wichita, KS

1,551 965 1,551 965 2,516 63 1987 05/07 40 years

Wichita, KS

3,275 1,631 3,275 1,631 4,906 107 1988 05/07 40 years

Columbus, OH

2,076 1,906 2,076 1,906 3,982 121 1990 06/07 40 years

Columbus, OH

5,380 2,693 5,380 2,693 8,073 171 1990 06/07 40 years

Bellingham, WA

1,237 1,260 1,237 408 1,645 61 1994 06/08 30 years

Plano, TX

5,705 17,049 5,705 17,049 22,754 710 1982 07/08 35 years

Value City Furniture:

White Marsh, MD

3,762 3,006 3,762 3,006 6,768 886 1998 10/97 (g) 40 years

Walgreens:

Sunrise, FL

1,958 1,401 1,958 1,401 3,359 232 1994 05/03 40 years

Tulsa, OK

1,193 3,056 1,193 3,056 4,249 347 2003 06/05 40 years

Washington Bike Center:

Fairfax, VA

193 279 84 193 363 556 76 1995 12/95 40 years

Wendy’s:

Sacramento, CA

586 586 (i ) 586 (i ) (i ) 02/98 (i )

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 23


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

New Kensington,

PA

501 333 501 333 834 67 1980 12/01 40 years

Whataburger:

Albuquerque, NM

624 419 624 419 1,043 84 1995 12/01 40 years

Brunswick, GA

291 910 291 910 1,201 62 2007 12/06 (m) 40 years

Starke, FL

476 982 476 982 1,458 73 2006 01/07 40 years

Jacksonville, FL

824 934 824 934 1,758 69 2006 01/07 40 years

Yulee, FL

894 1,014 894 1,014 1,908 75 2006 01/07 40 years

Wherehouse Music:

Homewood, AL

1,032 697 1,032 697 1,729 140 1997 12/01 40 years

Independence, MO

503 1,209 503 1,209 1,712 122 1994 12/05 40 years

Wingfoot:

Dandrige, TN

(l ) 1,030 (l ) 1,030 1,030 77 1989 05/07 35 years

Brunswick, GA

(l ) 1,450 (l ) 1,450 1,450 95 2003 05/07 40 years

Valdosta, GA

(l ) 1,477 (l ) 1,477 1,477 97 2004 05/07 40 years

Gary, IN

(l ) 1,486 (l ) 1,486 1,486 98 2004 05/07 40 years

Beaverdam, OH

(l ) 1,521 (l ) 1,521 1,521 100 2004 05/07 40 years

Dalton, GA

(l ) 1,541 (l ) 1,541 1,541 101 2004 05/07 40 years

Benton, AR

(l ) 309 (l ) 309 309 19 2001 05/07 40 years

Port Wentworth,

GA

(l ) 552 (l ) 552 552 41 1998 05/07 35 years

Mebane, NC

(l ) 561 (l ) 561 561 42 1998 05/07 35 years

Franklin, OH

(l ) 563 (l ) 563 563 42 1998 05/07 35 years

Piedmont, SC

(l ) 567 (l ) 567 567 42 1999 05/07 35 years

Georgetown, KY

(l ) 679 (l ) 679 679 59 1997 05/07 30 years

Bowman, SC

(l ) 969 (l ) 969 969 73 1998 05/07 35 years

Temple, GA

(l ) 1,065 (l ) 1,065 1,065 57 2007 06/07 40 years

Whiteland, IN

(l ) 1,471 (l ) 1,471 1,471 90 2004 07/07 40 years

Evansville, IN

(l ) 576 (l ) 576 576 35 2002 07/07 40 years

Des Moines, IA

(l ) 816 (l ) 816 816 50 1987 07/07 40 years

Robinson, TX

(l ) 1,183 (l ) 1,183 1,183 63 2007 07/07 40 years

Kearney, MO

(l ) 1,269 (l ) 1,269 1,269 78 2003 07/07 40 years

Oklahoma City, OK

(l ) 1,247 (l ) 1,247 1,247 58 2008 08/07 40 years

Amarillo, TX

(l ) 1,158 (l ) 1,158 1,158 45 2008 02/08 40 years

Jackson, MS

(l ) 1,281 (l ) 1,281 1,281 47 2008 03/08 40 years

Glendale, KY

(l ) 1,066 (l ) 1,066 1,066 32 2008 07/08 40 years

Lebanon, TN

(l ) 1,331 (l ) 1,331 1,331 35 2008 08/08 40 years

Laredo, TX

(l ) 1,238 (l ) 1,238 1,238 25 2009 11/08 40 years

Winn-Dixie:

Columbus, GA

1,023 1,875 1,023 1,875 2,898 303 1984 07/03 40 years

Your Choice:

Montoursville, PA

158 415 13 158 428 586 41 1988 01/06 40 years

Ziebart:

Middleburg Heights,

OH

199 148 199 148 347 18 1961 02/05 40 years

Maplewood, MN

308 311 308 311 619 38 1990 02/05 40 years

Zio’s Italian Kitchen:

Aurora, CO

1,168 1,105 1,168 1,105 2,273 153 2000 06/05 30 years

Leasehold Interests:

Lima, OH

1,290 1,290 (e ) 1,290 943 (e ) 08/01 (e )

SUBTOTAL

24,430 1,061,112 1,340,082 134,270 1,056,186 1,450,349 2,506,535 183,956

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 24


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Direct Financing Leases:

Barnes & Noble:

Plantation, FL

3,498 (c ) (c ) (c ) 1996 05/95 (f) (c )

Borders:

Altamonte Springs,

FL

3,267 (c ) (c ) (c ) 1997 09/97 (c )

Checkers:

Orlando, FL

287 (c ) (c ) (c ) 1988 07/92 (c )

CVS:

San
Antonio,

TX

784 (c ) (c ) (c ) 1993 12/93 (c )

Amarillo, TX

159 855 (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1994 12/94 (d )

Lafayette, LA

949 (c ) (c ) (c ) 1995 01/96 (c )

Oklahoma City, OK

(l ) 1,365 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1997 06/97 (c )

Oklahoma City, OK

(l ) 1,419 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1997 06/97 (c )

Denny’s:

Stockton, CA

940 509 (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1982 09/06 (d )

Food 4 Less:

Chula Vista, CA

4,266 (c ) (c ) (c ) 1995 11/98 (c )

Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:

York, PA

279 1,110 (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1997 11/98 (d )

Marlow Heights,

MD

416 1,397 (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1968 11/98 (d )

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 25


Table of Contents
Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements Carrying
Costs
Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total

Jared Jewelers:

Phoenix, AZ

267 (k) (l ) 1,242 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )

Toledo, OH

(l ) 1,458 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )

Oviedo, FL

392 (k) (l ) 1,500 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )

Lewisville, TX

201 (k) (l ) 1,503 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )

Glendale, AZ

(l ) 1,599 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )

Kash n’ Karry:

Valrico, FL

1,235 3,255 (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1997 06/02 (d )

Rite Aid:

Kennett Square,

PA

(l ) 1,984 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 2000 12/00 (c )

Arlington, VA

(l ) 3,201 (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 2000 02/02 (c )

Sunshine Energy:

Altamont, KS

124 142 (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1979 07/09 (d )

Chouteau, OK

113 301 (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1988 07/09 (d )

Neosho, MO

775 (c ) (c ) (c ) 1992 07/09 (c )

SUBTOTAL

860 3,266 34,682 1,984

Real Estate Held for Sale the Company has Invested in:

Our Place:

North Richland

Hills, TX

584 180 185 596 352 948 1989 02/06

Power Center:

Midland, MI

1,085 1,635 1,085 1,635 2,720 2006 05/05 (g)

Big Flats, NY

2,248 7,159 2,248 5,291 7,539 2006 08/05 (g)

Topsham, ME

1,885 1,735 1,885 62 1,947 2007 02/06 (g)

Irving, TX

951 1,090 951 1,090 2,041 1987 02/06

Waxahachie, TX

1,249 1,097 1,249 1,097 2,346 1995 02/06

Rockwall, TX

8,959 28,717 8,959 26,717 35,676 2007 02/06 (g)

Harlingen, TX

247 807 247 807 1,054 2008 09/06 (g)

Harlingen, TX

749 1,238 749 1,238 1,987 2008 09/06 (g)

Woodstock, GA

261 701 261 606 867 1997 07/08

Starbucks:

Harlingen, TX

286 369 286 369 655 2008 09/06

Tutor Time:

Elk Grove, CA

1,216 2,786 1,216 2,786 4,002 2009 09/08

Vacant Land:

Grand
Prairie,

TX

387 108 (e ) 108 (e ) (e ) 12/02

Topsham, ME

1,034 293 (e ) 293 (e ) (e ) 02/06

Rockwall, TX

9,153 4,950 (e ) 4,950 (e ) (e ) 02/06

Fairfield Township,

OH

3,201 1,719 (e ) 1,719 (e ) (e ) 08/06

Bonita Springs,

FL

112 25 (e ) 25 (e ) (e ) 09/06

Lancaster, OH

2,135 1,339 (e ) 1,339 (e ) (e ) 01/08

Hadley, MA

2,570 2,570 (e ) 2,570 (e ) (e ) 02/08

SUBTOTAL

38,312 47,514 185 30,736 42,050 72,786

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 26


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2009

(dollars in thousands)

(a) Transactions in real estate and accumulated depreciation during 2009, 2008, and 2007 are summarized as follows:

2009 2008 2007

Land, buildings, and leasehold interests:

Balance at the beginning of year

$ 2,605,296 $ 2,415,544 $ 1,756,514

Acquisitions, completed construction and tenant improvements

37,175 410,787 864,116

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

(21,751 ) (215,542 ) (203,403 )

Provision for loss on impairment of real estate

(34,514 ) (5,493 ) (1,683 )

Balance at the close of year

$ 2,586,206 $ 2,605,296 $ 2,415,544

Accumulated depreciation and amortization:

Balance at the beginning of year

$ 146,296 $ 111,087 $ 87,359

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

(3,143 ) (2,591 ) (3,667 )

Depreciation and amortization expense

40,803 37,800 27,395

Balance at the close of year

$ 183,956 $ 146,296 $ 111,087

As of December 31, 2009, the detailed real estate schedule excludes equipment and work in progress of $1,259 and $5,634, respectively, which is included in the above reconciliation.

(b) As of December 31, 2009, the leases are treated as either operating or financing leases for federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate cost of the properties owned by NNN that are under operating leases were $2,450,070 and financing leases were $5,894.
(c) For financial reporting purposes, the portion of the lease relating to the building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(d) For financial reporting purposes, the lease for the land and building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(e) NNN owns only the land for this property.
(f) Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN purchased the buildings from the tenants upon completion of construction, generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
(g) Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. NNN developed the buildings, generally completing construction within 12 months from the acquisition date of the land.
(h) In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of NNN’s tenants, in June of 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties.
(i) NNN owns only the land for this property, which is subject to a ground lease between NNN and the tenant. The tenant funded the improvements on the property.
(j) In 2005, there was a lease amendment to this property, resulting in a reclassification from a direct financing lease to an operating lease.
(k) NNN owns only the building for this property, which is encumbered by a fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.
(l) NNN owns only the building for this property. The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party.
(m) Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
(n) The tenant of this property has subleased the property. The tenant continues to be responsible for complying with all the terms of the lease agreement and is continuing to pay rent on this property to NNN.
(o) Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $6,952 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.
(p) Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $21,000 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 27


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

December 31, 2009

(dollars in thousands)

Description

Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Periodic
Payment
Terms
Prior
Liens
Face Amount
of Mortgages
Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages (e)
Principal Amount
of Loans Subject

to Delinquent
Principal or
Interest

First mortgages on properties:

Paramus, NJ

9.000 % 2022 (b ) 6,000 $ 5,218

Des Moines, IA

8.000 % 2010 (d ) 400 320

Terre Haute, IN

7.000 % 2011 (c ) 1,582 1,452

Houston, TX

9.932 % 2010 (c ) 3,998 3,998

Lubbock, TX

10.000 % 2010 (c ) 14,000 9,025

Cleveland, OH

10.000 % 2028 (c ) 6,644 6,644

Keystone Heights, FL

9.000 % 2010 (c ) 1,650 1,650

Chattanooga, TN

9.000 % 2010 (c ) 1,600 1,600

Lynchburg, VA

9.000 % 2010 (c ) 1,600 1,600

Martinsburg, WV

9.000 % 2010 (c ) 1,650 1,650

Milford, CT

7.000 % 2013 (c ) 1,550 1,550
$ 40,674 $ 34,707 (a) $

(a) The following shows the changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans during the years:

2009 2008 2007

Balance at beginning of year

$ 35,993 $ 49,336 $ 13,627

New mortgage loans

2,259 (f) 17,028 (f) 39,088 (f)

Deductions during the year:

Collections of principal

(3,545 ) (27,874 ) (3,379 )

Foreclosures

(2,497 )

Balance at the close of year

$ 34,707 $ 35,993 $ 49,336

(b) Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan.

(c) Interest only payments are due monthly. Principal is due at maturity.

(d) Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan with a principal balloon payment at maturity.

(e) Mortgages held by NNN and its subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $34,707, $35,993, and $49,336, respectively.

(f) Mortgages totaling $2,259, $17,028, and $39,088, were accepted in connection with real estate transactions for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security HoldersPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataNote 1 Organization and Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies:Note 2 Real Estate Investment Portfolio:Note 3 Real Estate Inventory Portfolio:Note 4 Impairments Real Estate:Note 5 Business Combinations:Note 6 Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable:Note 7 Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests:Note 8 Line Of Credit Payable:Note 9 Mortgages Payable:Note 10 Notes Payable Convertible :Note 10 Notes Payable ConvertibleNote 11 Notes Payable :Note 11 Notes PayableNote 12 Preferred Stock :Note 12 Preferred StockNote 13 Common Stock :Note 13 Common StockNote 14 Employee Benefit Plan :Note 14 Employee Benefit PlanNote 15 Dividends :Note 15 DividendsNote 16 Restructuring Costs :Note 16 Restructuring CostsNote 17 Income Taxes :Note 17 Income TaxesNote 18 Earnings From Discontinued Operations :Note 18 Earnings From Discontinued OperationsNote 19 Derivatives :Note 19 DerivativesNote 20 Performance Incentive Plan :Note 20 Performance Incentive PlanNote 21 Fair Value Of Financial Instruments :Note 21 Fair Value Of Financial InstrumentsNote 22 Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) :Note 22 Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)Note 23 Segment Information:Note 24 Fair Value Measurements:Note 25 Major Tenants:Note 26 Commitments and Contingencies:Note 27 Subsequent Events:Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules