UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
_______________________________________________________________________________
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
|
☐
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
☐
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
x
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
☐
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
☐
|
Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
|
_______________________________________________________________________________
Sunnova Energy International Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_______________________________________________________________________________
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
x
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
☐
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was previously paid. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
|
SUNNOVA ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC.
20 East Greenway Plaza, Suite 475
Houston, Texas 77046
April 9, 2020
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to join us for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 9:00 A.M., Houston Time, at the principal executive office of Sunnova Energy International Inc., 20 East Greenway Plaza, Conference Room 1, First Floor, Houston, Texas 77046.
We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring the public health and travel concerns of our stockholders and employees in light of COVID-19 (Coronavirus), as well as the related protocols that federal, state and local governments may impose. As part of our precautions, we are considering the possibility of changing the location of the Annual Meeting and/or holding a virtual meeting by means of remote communication. We will announce any alternative arrangements for the annual meeting as promptly as practicable. Further details on such alternative arrangements and how to participate will be issued by press release, posted on our website at https://investors.sunnova.com under "Latest News" (and also on our annual meeting website at www.proxydocs.com/NOVA) and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as additional proxy material. Please monitor these websites and filings with the SEC for updated information. In the event we hold a virtual meeting, in order to attend you will be required to register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/NOVA prior to the deadline of May 15, 2020 at 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the meeting. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting.
Please note you will only be able to participate in the meeting using remote communications if we decide to hold a virtual meeting by means of remote communication, instead of holding an in-person Annual Meeting
.
We are pleased to take advantage of the rules of the SEC that allow issuers to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders on the Internet. We believe these rules allow us to provide you with information you need while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. We are mailing to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, rather than a paper copy of the proxy statement, proxy and 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders. The notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials, vote and obtain, if you so desire, a paper copy of the proxy materials.
The proxy statement describes the items of business to be conducted at the meeting, which includes the election of three Class I members of our Board of Directors to serve three-year terms, an advisory non-binding resolution regarding the frequency for the advisory executive compensation vote, the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for the 2020 fiscal year, and to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof. At the Annual Meeting, we will also report on industry matters of current interest to our stockholders, and you will have an opportunity to ask questions following the completion of business.
It is important that your shares be represented. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the meeting in person, please take a moment now to vote your proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or, if printed proxy materials are mailed to you, by completing and signing the form of proxy and promptly returning it in the envelope provided. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders on the following page includes instructions on how to vote your shares.
The officers and directors of Sunnova Energy International Inc. appreciate and encourage stockholder participation. We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.
Sincerely,
/s/ William J. Berger
William J. Berger
President and Chief Executive Officer
2
SUNNOVA ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC.
20 East Greenway Plaza, Suite 475
Houston, Texas 77046
NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
|
DATE……………………...
|
Wednesday, May 20, 2020
|
|
TIME………………………
|
9:00 A.M., Houston Time
|
|
PLACE …………………...
|
20 East Greenway Plaza, Conference Room 1, First Floor
Houston, Texas 77046*
|
|
*In the event we decide to use a virtual meeting format by means of remote communication, further details on such alternative arrangements and how to participate will be issued by press release, posted on our website at https://investors.sunnova.com under "Latest News" (and also on our annual meeting website at www.proxydocs.com/NOVA) and filed with the SEC as additional proxy material. Please monitor these websites and our filings with the SEC for updated information. In the event we hold a Virtual Annual Meeting, in order to attend you will be required to register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/NOVA prior to the deadline of May 15, 2020 at 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the meeting. Beneficial owners of shares held in street name will need to follow the instructions provided by the broker, bank or other nominee that holds their shares. We would encourage stockholders to log in to this website and access the webcast before the Virtual Annual Meeting’s start time. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting. We will announce any alternative arrangements for the annual meeting as promptly as practicable.
Please note you will only be able to participate in the meeting using remote communications if we decide to hold a virtual meeting by means of remote communication, instead of holding an in-person Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
ITEMS OF BUSINESS ...
|
1. To elect the three Class I members of our Board of Directors specified in the accompanying proxy statement to serve three-year terms.
2. To establish, by a stockholder non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of submission to stockholders of an advisory vote regarding executive compensation.
3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2020.
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
|
|
RECORD DATE ………..
|
You may vote, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting if you were a holder of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 23, 2020.
|
|
VOTING BY PROXY …..
|
In order to avoid additional soliciting expense to us, please vote your proxy as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the meeting. Stockholders of record can vote by one of the following methods:
1. Call 1-866-390-5419 to vote by telephone;
2. Go to www.proxypush.com/NOVA to vote over the Internet; or
3. If you received a paper copy of your proxy materials, please MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN your proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you are voting by telephone or the Internet, please do not mail your proxy card.
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDERS MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2020.
A COPY OF THE PROXY STATEMENT, A FORM OF PROXY, AND THE SUNNOVA ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.PROXYDOCS.COM/NOVA
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Walter A. Baker
Walter A. Baker
Secretary
April 9, 2020
2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
SUNNOVA ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC.
_______________
PROXY STATEMENT
______________
This proxy statement relates to the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Sunnova Energy International Inc. for use at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 20, 2020 at 9:00 A.M., Houston Time, at 20 East Greenway Plaza, Conference Room 1, First Floor, Houston, Texas 77046 and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy statement contains information about the items being voted on at the Annual Meeting. Please read it carefully.
In the event we decide to use a virtual meeting format by means of remote communication, further details on such alternative arrangements and how to participate will be issued by press release, posted on our website at https://investors.sunnova.com under "Latest News" (and also on our annual meeting website at www.proxydocs.com/NOVA) and filed with the SEC as additional proxy material. Please monitor these websites and our filings with the SEC for updated information. In the event we hold a virtual meeting, in order to attend you will be required to register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/NOVA prior to the deadline of May 15, 2020 at 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique link that will allow you access to the meeting.
Beneficial owners of shares held in street name will need to follow the instructions provided by the broker, bank or other nominee that holds their shares. We would encourage stockholders to log in to this website and access the webcast before the Virtual Annual Meeting’s start time. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting. We will announce any alternative arrangements for the annual meeting as promptly as practicable.
Please note you will only be able to participate in the meeting using remote communications if we decide to hold a virtual meeting by means of remote communication, instead of holding an in-person Annual Meeting.
This proxy statement, a form of proxy and voting instructions are expected to be mailed on or about April 9, 2020. Our 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders, including consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, is expected to be mailed at the same time. The Annual Report is not to be considered as a part of the proxy solicitation material or as having been incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Our principal executive office is located at 20 East Greenway Plaza, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77046, our telephone number is (281) 985-9904 and our website address is
www.sunnova.com.
Information contained on our website, including information referred to in this proxy statement, is not to be considered as part of the proxy solicitation material and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING
Who is entitled to vote?
Only holders of record of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, on March 23, 2020 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of the record date, there were 84,026,062 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters. No other class of securities will be entitled to vote at the meeting.
1
A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open to the examination of any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting for a period of 10 days prior to the meeting at the Company’s principal executive offices set forth above during usual business hours. Such list shall also be open to the examination of any stockholder present at the meeting.
Who is soliciting my proxy to vote my shares?
Our Board is soliciting your proxy, or your authorization for our representatives to vote your shares. Your proxy will be effective for the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
What are our Board's voting recommendations regarding the election of directors and proposals?
Our Board recommends that you vote as follows:
|
Proposal to be Voted Upon
|
Recommendation
|
|
|
Proposal No. 1
|
Election of three Class I nominees to the Board of Directors
|
“FOR”
Each Nominee
|
|
Proposal No. 2
|
Advisory vote on the frequency of submission to stockholders of an advisory vote regarding executive compensation
|
“One Year”
|
|
Proposal No. 3
|
Ratification of the Company’s independent auditors
|
“FOR”
|
What constitutes a quorum?
For
business to be conducted at the meeting, a quorum constituting a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote must be in attendance or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes (defined below) will be considered as present for quorum purposes.
How do I vote?
Stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting may vote in person or by proxy. Proxies may be submitted over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Proxies submitted over the Internet or by telephone must be received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 19, 2020. Submitting a proxy authorizes the persons appointed as proxies to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner that you have indicated. The persons named in the form of proxy (Robert L. Lane and Walter A. Baker) have advised that they will vote all shares represented by proxy unless authority to so vote is withheld by the stockholder granting the proxy. If your proxy does not indicate your vote, the persons named in the proxy will vote your shares
“FOR”
our Board’s director nominees,
“ONE YEAR”
as the frequency for the advisory executive compensation vote, and
“FOR”
the ratification of the appointment of our independent auditors. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the persons named in the proxy.
Can I change my vote?
A proxy may be revoked by a stockholder at any time before it is voted by giving notice of the revocation in writing to the Company’s Secretary at 20 East Greenway Plaza, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77046, by submitting another valid proxy by mail, telephone or over the Internet that is later dated and, if mailed, is properly signed, or by voting in person at the meeting.
2
What are the requirements to elect the directors and approve each of the proposals?
The election of directors and the ratification of the appointment of independent auditors each require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy who are entitled to vote, and who voted for or against the proposal, at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of these proposals.
The advisory vote on the frequency of the Company’s executive compensation advisory vote requires the vote of holders of a plurality of votes cast by the shares represented in person or by proxy at a meeting at which a quorum is present, in that the option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast will be deemed to be the frequency selected by the stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the election outcome.
If my shares are held in a “street name” by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?
Brokers holding shares must vote according to specific instructions they receive from the beneficial owners of those shares. If brokers do not receive specific instructions, brokers may in some cases vote the shares in their discretion. Under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, the approval of the proposal to ratify the appointment of independent auditors is considered a “discretionary” item. This means that brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on this matter on behalf of clients who have not furnished voting instructions at least 10 days before the date of the meeting. In contrast, the election of directors and the advisory vote on the frequency of the Company’s advisory vote on executive compensation are “non-discretionary” items. This means brokerage firms that have not received voting instructions from their clients on these proposals may not vote on them. These so-called “broker non-votes” will be considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum.
What happens if I am a registered holder?
If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are the holder of record of such shares. As the holder of record, you have the right to give your proxy directly to us, to give your voting instructions by telephone or over the Internet or to vote in person by ballot at the meeting.
What happens if I abstain or withhold my vote on any proposal?
Abstentions are counted as present in determining whether the quorum requirement is satisfied. With respect to the director elections, the advisory vote on the frequency of the Company’s advisory vote on executive compensation and the ratification of the appointment of independent auditors, abstentions will have no effect on the outcome.
Does Sunnova offer electronic delivery of proxy materials?
Yes. We are making this proxy statement, the form of proxy and our 2019 Annual Report available to stockholders electronically via the Internet on www.proxydocs.com/NOVA
.
On or about April 9, 2020, we began mailing to our stockholders proxy materials and a Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our Annual Report and how to vote by telephone or online. The notice is not a form for voting.
What is “householding”?
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules allow us to deliver a single copy of our Annual Report and proxy statement to any household not participating in electronic proxy material delivery
3
at which two or more stockholders reside, if we believe the stockholders are members of the same family. This role benefits both you and the Company. We believe it eliminates duplicate mailings to stockholders living at the same address and reduces our printing and mailing costs. This rule applies to any Annual Report or proxy statement. Each stockholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card or voting instruction card.
Your household may have received a single set of proxy materials this year. If you prefer to receive your own copy, or if you have received multiple copies and prefer a single set, please make your request by calling 1-866-648-8133, using the website www.investorelections.com/NOVA
,
via email at paper@investorelections.com, or in writing by regular mail to Sunnova Energy International Inc., c/o Computershare, P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, Kentucky 40233-5000 or by overnight delivery to 462 South 4
th
Street, Suite 1600 Louisville, Kentucky 40202. We will promptly send separate proxy materials to a stockholder at a shared address on request.
If a broker or other nominee holds your shares, you may continue to receive some duplicate mailings. Certain brokers will eliminate duplicate account mailings by allowing stockholders to consent to such elimination or through implied consent if a stockholder does not request continuation of duplicate mailings. Since not all brokers and nominees may offer stockholders the opportunity this year to eliminate duplicate mailings, you may need to contact your broker or nominee directly to discontinue duplicate mailings to your household.
What if I plan to attend the Annual Meeting?
Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to stockholders as of the record date, March 23, 2020. Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Stockholders holding common stock in brokerage accounts or by a bank or other nominee will be required to show a brokerage statement or account statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date. Cameras, recording devices and certain other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting.
How are proxies being solicited?
We are soliciting the proxies and will bear the entire cost of this solicitation. It is expected that the solicitation will be primarily by mail, telephone and facsimile. Proxies may also be solicited personally by our directors, officers and other employees in the ordinary course of business. No additional compensation for soliciting proxies will be paid to our directors, officers or other regular employees for their proxy solicitation efforts. We will also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their out-of-pocket expenses in sending these materials to you.
What do I do if I receive more than one notice or proxy card?
If you hold your shares in more than one account, you will receive a notice or proxy card for each account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, please sign, date and return all proxy cards or use each proxy card or notice to vote by telephone or Internet. Please be sure to vote all of your shares.
Will there be any other business conducted at the Annual Meeting?
Our Board is not aware of any other matters that are to be presented for action at the meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the appointed proxies.
4
Who is the Transfer Agent?
Our Transfer Agent is Computershare. All communications concerning stockholders of record accounts, including address changes, name changes, common stock transfer requirements and similar issues can be handled by contacting Computershare by phone at 1-800-736-3001, via email at
www.us.computershare.com/investor
in writing by regular mail at Computershare P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, Kentucky 40233-5000 or by overnight delivery to 462 South 4
th
Street, Suite 1600 Louisville, Kentucky 40202.
Could emerging developments regarding the coronavirus affect our ability to hold an in-person Annual Meeting?
We are monitoring the coronavirus situation closely and if we determine that holding an in-person annual meeting could pose a risk to the health and safety of our shareholders, employees, and directors, the Company may decide to instead change the location of the Annual Meeting and/or hold a virtual meeting by means of remote communication. If we decide to use a virtual meeting format, we will make a public announcement as soon as practicable prior to the meeting.
5
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board of Directors
At our Annual Meeting, three Class I directors are to be elected for terms of three years each. The nominees have agreed to be named in this proxy statement and have indicated a readiness to continue to serve if elected. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board has determined that each of the nominees qualifies for election under its criteria for the evaluation of directors and has recommended that each of the candidates be nominated for election. If any nominee becomes unable to serve before the Annual Meeting, shares represented by proxy may be voted for a substitute designated by our Board, unless a contrary instruction is indicated on the proxy. Our Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will become unavailable. As detailed under “Corporate Governance - General” below, our Board has affirmatively determined that each of the nominees, other than Mr. Berger qualifies as “independent” as that term is defined under the rules of the NYSE and the SEC.
The following provides certain information regarding our Board as of February 28, 2020:
|
Name
|
Present Position with the Company
|
Served as a Director
Continuously Since |
Age
|
|||
|
Anne S. Andrew
|
Director
|
October 2019
|
64
|
|||
|
William J. Berger*
|
Director and Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
April 2019
|
46
|
|||
|
Rahman D'Argenio*
|
Director
|
June 2019
|
41
|
|||
|
Matthew DeNichilo
|
Director
|
June 2019
|
35
|
|||
|
Doug Kimmelman
|
Director
|
June 2019
|
59
|
|||
|
Mark Longstreth
|
Director
|
June 2019
|
37
|
|||
|
Michael C. Morgan*
|
Director
|
June 2019
|
51
|
|||
|
C. Park Shaper
|
Director
|
June 2019
|
51
|
|||
|
Scott D. Steimer
|
Director
|
June 2019
|
30
|
|||
*Nominee for Class I director
Anne Slaughter Andrew
was appointed to our Board on October 16, 2019. Ms. Andrew is an accomplished executive, lawyer, entrepreneur and diplomat whose career has centered on developing strategies and advancing solutions for a thriving economy and sustainable environment. Since August 2018, Ms. Andrew has served as a principal of WindRun Alliances LLC, a consulting company. Since 2014, Ms. Andrew was an investor, member of the board of directors, and chair of the audit committee of Ad Astra Rocket Company, a spaceflight technology company with a subsidiary developing an integrated "turn-key" solution of distributed renewable energy systems, and an investor and member of the board of directors of Metalub Soluciones Verdes MSV S.A., a sustainable lubricant oil company whose mission is to reduce its customers’ carbon footprint. Ms. Andrew also serves as a director and chair of the nominating and governance committees of two non-profit organizations, The NewDEAL and Natural Resources Defense Council. Ms. Andrew was U.S. Ambassador to Costa Rica from December 2009 until June 2013. Ms. Andrew holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Georgetown University and graduated cum laude from Indiana University McKinney School of Law with a Juris Doctor.
6
William J. (John) Berger
has served on our Board since April 1, 2019. Mr. Berger founded Sunnova Energy Corporation in 2012 and has since then served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board. With more than two decades of experience in the electric power industry, Mr. Berger is an energy entrepreneur who has always supported free market competition, consumer choice and the advancement of energy technology to power energy independence. Before Sunnova, Mr. Berger served as Founder and Chief Executive Officer at SunCap Financial, a residential solar service provider. He also founded Standard Renewable Energy, a provider and installer of renewable energy and energy-efficient products and services. Mr. Berger received his Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School and graduated cum laude from Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in civil engineering.
Rahman D'Argenio
was appointed to the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation in March 2016 and was appointed to our Board on June 20, 2019. Mr. D’Argenio was appointed in connection with his affiliation with Energy Capital Partners ("ECP"), where he is a Partner and a member of the Investment Committee. Mr. D’Argenio joined Energy Capital Partners in 2010. He is involved in all areas of the firm’s investment activities, with particular emphasis on fossil and renewable power generation and energy related services. Mr. D’Argenio also currently serves on the boards of directors of Nesco Holdings, Inc., Nesco Holdings, LP, Reflectance Energy GP, LLC, Triton Power Partners LP, PLH Group, Inc. and Transit Energy Group, LLC. Prior to realization, Mr. D’Argenio served on the boards of directors of Brayton Point Power, LLC, EquiPower Resources Corp., Odessa Power Holdings, LLC and Red Oak Power Holdings, LLC. Mr. D'Argenio received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Mathematics and Economics from the University of Pennsylvania in 2000.
Matthew DeNichilo
was appointed to the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation in March 2016 and was appointed to our Board on June 20, 2019. Mr. DeNichilo was appointed in connection with his affiliation with ECP, where he is a Partner. Mr. DeNichilo has been with ECP since 2008. Mr. DeNichilo serves as a co-head of ECP’s credit platform, and he is a member of the Credit Investment Committee and Credit Operating Committee. Mr. DeNichilo also currently serves on the board of directors of Terra-Gen Power Holdings II, LLC. Previously, Mr. DeNichilo served on the boards of directors of PLH Group, Inc., Broad River Holdings, LLC, Empire Gen Holdings, Inc., Brayton Point Power, LLC and EquiPower Resources Corp. Prior to joining ECP, Mr. DeNichilo worked at JP Morgan in the Energy Investment Banking Group. While at JP Morgan, he focused on leveraged finance and mergers and acquisitions transactions among independent power producers. Mr. DeNichilo received his Bachelor of Science in Engineering degree in Operations, Research and Financial Engineering from Princeton University.
Doug Kimmelman
was appointed to the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation in March 2016 and was appointed to our Board on June 20, 2019. Mr. Kimmelman was appointed in connection with his affiliation with ECP, which he established in April 2005 and where he serves as its Senior Partner. Mr. Kimmelman also currently serves on the boards of directors of Calpine Corporation, US Development Group, LLC, USD Partners GP, LLC, USD Partners, LP, Nesco Holdings LP, and Nesco Holdings, Inc (NYSE:NSCO). He previously served on the boards of directors of CE2 Carbon Capital, LLC and PLH Group, Inc. He is a member of ECP’s Management Committee and Investment Committee. Prior to founding ECP, Mr. Kimmelman spent 22 years with Goldman Sachs, starting in 1983 in the firm’s Pipeline and Utilities Department within the Investment Banking Division. He was named a General Partner of Goldman Sachs in 1996 and remained exclusively focused on the energy and utility sectors in the Investment Banking Division until 2002 when he transferred to Goldman Sach’s J. Aron commodity group to help form a new business for the firm in being an intermediary in electricity trading markets. Mr. Kimmelman was instrumental in developing the Constellation Power Source concept as the initial entry point for Goldman Sachs as a principal into electricity markets. Mr. Kimmelman also played a leadership role at Goldman Sachs in building a principal investing business in power generation and related energy assets. Mr. Kimmelman received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Stanford
7
University and his Master of Business Administration from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Mark Longstreth
was appointed to the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation in March 2018 and was appointed to our Board on June 20, 2019. Mr. Longstreth was appointed in connection with his affiliation with Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd. Mr. Longstreth is a Partner at Newlight Partners LP, focusing on the power and energy sectors. Prior to joining Newlight Partners LP upon its founding in 2018, he was a Managing Director in the Strategic Investment Group at Soros Fund Management LLC, also focusing on power and energy. Mr. Longstreth joined Soros Fund Management in 2007. Mr. Longstreth also currently serves on the boards of Bioenergy Development Group HoldCo, LLC; BTS Biogas S.r.l./Gmbh; Leyline Renewable Capital, LLC; VPI Holding Limited and GRL Holdings Pty Ltd. Prior to that, Mr. Longstreth was an Analyst in Investment Banking at Bear Stearns & Co. Mr. Longstreth received his Bachelor of Science degree in Foreign Service in International Economics from Georgetown University in 2004.
Michael C. Morgan
was appointed to the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation in October 2015 and was appointed to our Board on June 20, 2019. Mr. Morgan was appointed in connection with his affiliation with Triangle Peak Partners, LP. Mr. Morgan has served as a director of Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its predecessors since 2007. He served in various management roles for the Kinder Morgan companies from 1997 to 2004, including as President of Kinder Morgan, Inc., Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc. and Kinder Morgan Management, LLC from 2001 until 2004. He has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Triangle Peak Partners, LP, a registered investment adviser and fund manager, since 2008. He also has been President of Portcullis Partners, L.P., a private investment partnership, since 2004. Mr. Morgan was a director of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company and Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc. from 2007 until 2008. Mr. Morgan received his Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School and his Bachelor of Arts degree and his Master of Arts from Stanford University.
C. Park Shaper
was appointed to the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation in October 2015 and was appointed to our Board on June 20, 2019. Since 2013, Mr. Shaper has been CEO of Seis Holdings, LLC, a private investment holding company. Mr. Shaper served in various management roles at Kinder Morgan, Inc. and at certain of its affiliates beginning in 2000 until March 2013, when he retired as President of Kinder Morgan, Inc., Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Management, LLC and the general partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Mr. Shaper was a director of Kinder Morgan Management, LLC and Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc. from 2003 until March 2013, President of Kinder Morgan, Inc., Kinder Morgan Management, LLC and Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc. from 2005 until March 2013, and a director and President of the general partner of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. from May 2012 until March 2013. Mr. Shaper was CFO of the Kinder Morgan entities from 2000 until 2005. Mr. Shaper remains a director of Kinder Morgan, Inc., a position which he has held (including with its predecessor) since May 2008. Mr. Shaper is also a trust manager of Weingarten Realty Investors and serves as the chairman of its compensation committee and a member of its audit committee. Mr. Shaper received his Master of Business Administration from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and his Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Quantitative Economics from Stanford University.
Scott Steimer
was appointed to the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation in December 2018 and was appointed to our Board on June 20, 2019. Mr. Steimer was appointed in connection with his affiliation with ECP, where he is a Vice President. He is involved in all areas of ECP’s investment activities, with particular emphasis on fossil and renewable power generation. Mr. Steimer also serves on the board of directors of Heartland Generation, LLC. Prior to joining ECP in 2015, Mr. Steimer worked in the Power & Utilities Investment Banking Group at Bank of America Merrill Lynch
8
from April 2013 to March 2015. Mr. Steimer received his Bachelor of Science degree in Finance and Accounting from Ithaca College.
Recommendation of our Board
Our Board recommends a vote “FOR” election as directors of the persons nominated herein.
9
Specific Experience, Qualifications and Skills of the Members of Our Board of Directors
Our Board is comprised of highly qualified individuals with unique and special skills that assist in effective management of the Company for the benefit of our stockholders. Each of our directors possesses certain experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, as further described below, that led to our conclusion that he or she should serve as a member of our Board. In addition to the foregoing biographical information with respect to each of our directors, the following table evidences additional experience and qualifications of our individual directors:
|
Directors
|
Specific Qualifications and Skills
|
|
|
Anne Slaughter Andrew
|
•
Over 25 years of executive experience
•
Service on other boards of directors, including on audit and nominating and governance committees
•
Executive, legal, entrepreneurial and diplomatic experience
|
|
|
Rahman D’Argenio
|
•
Over 20 years in the energy industry
•
Service on other boards of directors, including on investment committees
•
Finance and investment experience
|
|
|
William J. Berger
|
•
Serves as our President and Executive Officer
•
Founder of the Company
•
Over 20 years in the electric power industry
•
Entrepreneurial experience and knowledge
|
|
|
Matthew DeNichilo
|
•
Partner of private equity firm
•
Service on other boards, including Credit Investment and Credit Operating Committees
•
Extensive experience in investment, finance, mergers and acquisitions
|
|
|
Doug Kimmelman
|
•
Over 30 years of executive experience
•
Founder and senior partner of a private equity firm
•
Recognized for building a principal investing business in power generation and related energy assets
•
Service on other boards of directors, including on investment committees
|
|
|
Mark Longstreth
|
•
Partner of a private equity firm focusing on the power and energy sectors
•
Service on other companies’ boards of directors
•
Investment experience and knowledge
|
|
|
Michael C. Morgan
|
•
Over 20 years of executive experience
•
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a registered investment adviser and fund manager
•
Service on other boards of directors, including director of a publicly traded pipeline transportation and energy storage company
|
|
|
C. Park Shaper
|
•
Chief Executive Officer of a private investment holding company
•
Over ten years of executive experience with a publicly traded pipeline transportation and energy storage company
•
Service on other publicly traded companies' boards of directors, including on the compensation and audit committees
|
|
|
Scott Steimer
|
•
Vice President of a private equity firm
•
Investment knowledge in the energy sector
|
|
10
Corporate Governance
General
Our Board has established corporate governance practices to assist in the exercise of its responsibilities under applicable law and the listing standards of the NYSE and to govern the employees of the Company. These governance practices are contained in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and Code of Conduct. We have instituted mandatory sign-off and training for employees on our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and other relevant compliance topics, including our Anti-Bribery Compliance Program, our Gifts and Entertainment Policy, and our Discrimination and Harassment Policy.
The non-management directors of our Board meet regularly in executive session immediately following each regularly scheduled Board meeting without management participation. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that non-management directors will meet in executive session at least once a year. Currently, the director who presides at these meetings is Mr. D’Argenio. During any period in which the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are combined the Board of Directors shall appoint a lead independent director (the “Lead Director”). The Lead Director will be chosen on an annual basis by our Board at the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Currently, the Lead Director is Mr. D’Argenio.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board evaluates the Company’s and our Board's governance practices and formally reviews all committee charters and our Corporate Governance Guidelines along with recommendations from the various committees of our Board at least annually. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board also receives updates as necessary regarding new developments in the corporate governance arena. In addition, our committee charters require, among other things, that the committees and our Board annually evaluate their own performance. Our current Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters, and Code of Conduct may be found on our website at
www.sunnova.com
under "Investors - Governance." Information contained on our website, including information referred to in this proxy statement, is not to be considered as part of this proxy statement and is not incorporated into this proxy statement. We will continue to monitor our governance practices in order to maintain our high standards.
Board of Directors Leadership
Our Board has chosen to combine the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and currently, Mr. Berger serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors. As founder of the Company, Mr. Berger has specialized knowledge regarding the strategic challenges and opportunities facing the Company as well as knowledge valuable to executing the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors including insight into the regulation of and risks inherent to the business. Mr. D’Argenio, as Lead Director, acts as the principal liaison between the independent directors and Mr. Berger.
Code of Ethics
Included with our Corporate Governance Guidelines detailed on our website,
www.sunnova.com
, and available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy, are our Code of Conduct and our Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any changes in these codes of ethics we have adopted and/or any waiver therefrom by posting such information on our website or by filing a Form 8-K for such events.
11
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Our Board has adopted a policy whereby all transactions with related parties must be made in compliance with our Board's policy on related party transactions. Such transactions must be recommended by management and must be on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from unrelated third parties. To identify related party transactions, each year we distribute and require our directors and officers to complete a questionnaire identifying transactions with the Company in which the director or officer or their immediate family members have an interest. In addition, our Code of Conduct requires directors and officers to report any actual or potential conflicts of interests. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions.
In July 2019, in connection with our IPO, our Board determined that a relationship does not interfere with a director exercising independent judgment in carrying out such director’s responsibilities if it:
|
(a)
|
is a type of relationship addressed in:
|
|
•
|
Item 404 of Regulation S-K, as amended, of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
|
|
•
|
Section 303A.02, as amended, of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “NYSE Rules”),
|
but under those rules neither requires disclosure nor precludes a determination of independence; or
(b) consists of charitable contributions by the Company to an organization where a director is an executive officer and does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the organization’s gross revenue in any of the last three years. Our Board reviewed the relevant provisions of the NYSE Rules with regard to the independence of directors and after full discussion determined that the following directors serving at the time of the IPO had no material relationship with the Company that may interfere with the exercise of independence from management and the Company and therefore are independent directors of the Company: Rahman D’Argenio, Matthew DeNichilo, Doug Kimmelman, Mark Longstreth, Michael C. Morgan, C. Park Shaper, and Scott Steimer.
On January 15, 2019, pursuant to a separation agreement between Sunnova Energy Corporation and Jordan Kozar, the former Chief Financial Officer, we repurchased 31,460 shares of our Series A convertible preferred stock from Mr. Kozar at a purchase price of $5.80 a share for an aggregate purchase price of $0.2 million.
In June 2019, we issued a subordinated convertible note for $15.0 million (the “2021 subordinated convertible note”) to certain of our existing investors. In connection with the completion of our initial public offering, the 2021 subordinated convertible note plus any accrued and unpaid interest converted into approximately 2,613,818 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, which in turn converted into approximately 1,120,360 shares of common stock in the preferred stock conversions.
In March 2018, we entered into a Bonus Agreement with Mr. Berger (the “Bonus Agreement”) providing that each year beginning January 1, 2019, one-fourth of the outstanding loan balance (and related accrued and unpaid interest) under the promissory notes executed by Mr. Berger and Jackson Leigh Ventures, LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Berger, in favor of Sunnova Energy Corporation, in combined aggregate principal amounts totaling $1,702,523 (the “JLV Notes”), is to be forgiven provided that Mr. Berger remains employed through the applicable forgiveness date, such that the full amount of the JLV Notes will be forgiven as of January 1, 2022. In connection with the Bonus Agreement, Mr. Berger’s NEO Employment Agreement was amended to increase his bonus potential to 175% of base salary (from 125% of base salary). In the event that Mr. Berger’s employment is terminated due his death
12
or permanent disability, the Bonus Agreement provides that the full amount of the then outstanding balance of the Notes (and related accrued interest) would be forgiven. In January 2019, one-fourth of the balance of the Notes was forgiven pursuant to the Bonus Agreement. On June 20, 2019, as additional bonus compensation, the remaining principal and interest in the amount of $1,374,896 associated with the JLV Notes was forgiven, and Sunnova Energy Corporation agreed to pay Mr. Berger a bonus to reimburse him for the expected tax liability associated with such forgiveness of $892,039.
Risk Management
Our Board has oversight responsibility of the processes established to report and monitor material risks applicable to us. Our Audit Committee assists our Board in oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the review of our internal and independent auditors. Certain risks associated with the performance of our executive management fall within the authority of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is responsible for evaluating potential conflicts of interest and independence of directors and Board of Directors candidates, monitoring and developing corporate governance principles and overseeing the process by which our Board, our Chief Executive Officer and our executive management are evaluated. Risks associated with retaining executive management fall within the scope of the authority of our Compensation Committee, which assists our Board in reviewing and administering compensation, benefits, incentive and equity−based compensation plans. To assist in satisfying these responsibilities, the Compensation Committee has retained its own independent compensation consultant and meets regularly with management to understand the financial, human resources and stockholder implications of compensation decisions being made. Responsibility for risk oversight that does not fall within the scope of authority of the three standing committees of our Board rests with our entire Board. Our Board also has the responsibility for monitoring and assessing any potential material risks identified by its committees, or otherwise ensuring management is monitoring and assessing, and, to the extent appropriate, mitigating such risks. Risks falling within this area include, but are not limited to, general business and industry risks, operating risks, financial risks and compliance risks.
Our Board plans to delegate to management the responsibility to manage risk and bring to the attention of our Board the most material risks to our Company. We will not assign the responsibility for all risk management to a single risk management officer within our executive management. Rather, we will rely on executive management to administer an enterprise risk management program (the “ERM program") that is designed to ensure that all significant risks to the Company, on a consolidated basis, are being managed and monitored appropriately. Our Internal Audit Department oversees an annual enterprise risk assessment (the “ERA”). The ERA is designed to identify the portfolio of the Company’s business risks, to individually evaluate their likelihood of occurrence, and to identify existing and potential future mitigation strategies. The ERM program will assess the potential magnitude of the most significant risks identified in the ERA, identify other operational, commercial, macroeconomic and geopolitical risks facing the Company, monitor key indicators to assess the effectiveness of the Company's risk management activities, and manage risks to be within the Company’s desired risk profile. Meetings will be held at least quarterly to discuss risk mitigation efforts to manage identified risks. The management team present in the risk management meetings will include our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, and the other members of our management team charged with evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls. Meetings will be facilitated by our Internal Audit Department head. Our Board will monitor the ERM program and other risk management information provided to it to assess the Company’s risk management practices and systems in light of the risk philosophy and risk tolerance of our Board. The ERM program results will be reported to our Board each quarter to assist in its oversight of risk management.
13
Hedging and Pledging Policy
Company insiders, which include our directors, executive officers and employees designated as insiders as a result of their positions or responsibilities, are not permitted to (i) trade in Company options, puts, calls or similar derivative instruments; (ii) sell Company securities short or to enter into any hedging arrangement in Company securities; or (iii) hold Company securities in margin accounts or pledge Company securities.
Process for Communication by Interested Parties with the Board of Directors
Our Board has established a process whereby interested parties may communicate with our Board and/or with any individual director. Interested parties, including stockholders, may send communications in writing, addressed to the Board of Directors or an individual director, c/o the Secretary, Sunnova Energy International Inc., 20 East Greenway Plaza, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77046. Our Secretary will forward these communications as appropriate to the addressee depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. Our Board has directed our Secretary not to forward certain items such as spam, junk mailings, product inquiries, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys and business solicitations. Additionally, our Board has advised the Secretary not to forward material that is illegal or threatening, but to make our Board aware of such material which it may request be forwarded, retained or destroyed at our Board's discretion. The interested party may alternatively submit such communications through our Employee Hotline system. The Employee Hotline system can be contacted via telephone at 1-855-375-6718 or on the internet at
https://sunnova.ethicspoint.com
.
Director Independence
Our Board has determined that all eight of the current non-management directors of the Company (Ms. Andrew and Messrs. D’Argenio, DeNichilo, Kimmelman, Longstreth, Morgan, Shaper and Steimer) qualify as “independent” under the corporate governance rules of the NYSE, that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as “independent” under Rule 10A-3 of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and that each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as “independent” under Rule 10C-1 of the Exchange Act. Our Board has not established separate independence requirements beyond those of the NYSE, the Exchange Act or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code").
In addition, we have made no contributions to any tax-exempt organization in which any independent director serves as an executive officer.
Committees of Our Board of Directors and Meetings
Our Board held four meetings in 2019, of which three were telephonic meetings. Each director attended 75% or more of the total meetings of our Board and the committees on which such director served. Additionally, the non-management members of our Board met in executive session four times, and each non-management director attended 75% or more of the executive sessions in person. The Company does not have a policy with regard to our Board's attendance at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
14
Our Board currently has, and appoints members to, three standing Committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance. The following chart shows the current committee membership and positions of each director:
|
Director
|
Audit
Committee
|
Compensation
Committee
|
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Committee
|
|||
|
Anne S. Andrew
|
X
|
|||||
|
William J. Berger
|
||||||
|
Rahman D’ Argenio
|
X (Chair)
|
X (Chair)
|
||||
|
Matthew DeNichilo
|
X
|
|||||
|
Doug Kimmelman
|
||||||
|
Mark Longstreth
|
X
|
X
|
||||
|
Michael Morgan
|
X
|
X
|
||||
|
C. Park Shaper+
|
X (Chair)
|
X
|
||||
|
Scott Steimer
|
||||||
_____________
+ Audit Committee Financial Expert
Audit Committee
. Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Longstreth, Morgan, and Shaper (Chair). Our Board has determined that Mr. Shaper serves as the audit committee financial expert as that term is defined under the applicable federal securities laws and regulations. Our Audit Committee reviews our accounting policies and audit procedures, and supervises internal accounting controls. Our Audit Committee held three meetings during 2019, of which two were telephonic. Our Board has adopted a written charter for our Audit Committee, a copy of which is available in print to any stockholder upon request.
Compensation Committee.
Our Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. D’Argenio (Chair), Longstreth and Morgan and is responsible for administration of our stock incentive plans and for the review and recommendation to our full Board of all compensation for our directors, officers and employees. During 2019, our Compensation Committee held one meeting, which was telephonic. Our Board has adopted a written charter for our Compensation Committee which is available in print to any stockholder upon request. Pursuant to the charter, our Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or subcommittees, provided that the subcommittee is composed entirely of independent directors and has a published charter.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Ms. Andrew and Messrs. D’Argenio (Chair), DeNichilo and Shaper and is responsible for assisting our Board in determining the appropriate size and composition of our Board, as well as in monitoring and making recommendations regarding our Board's’ performance. During 2019, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting. In addition, prior to our initial public offering ("IPO") the board of directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation reviewed and approved a number of corporate governance policies that were subsequently adopted by our Board in connection with the IPO. Our Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee which is available in print to any stockholder upon request.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, the selection and recommendation to our Board of nominees for election of directors. Working closely with our full Board, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee develops criteria for open Board positions, taking into account such factors as it deems appropriate, which may include the current composition of our Board, the range of talents and skills already represented on our Board, and the need
15
for other particular expertise. Applying these criteria, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members as well as management and stockholders. From time to time, the Committee may retain third-party executive search firms to identify and review candidates. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all director nominees recommended to it, including those recommended by third parties, and stockholders. Such nominations should be directed to any member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, see "Process for Communication by Interested Parties with the Board of Directors". Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee thoughtfully considers the unique qualifications and skills of any candidate or nominee for our Board. Our Board strives to maintain independence of thought and diverse professional experience among its membership. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate all nominees, for the following:
|
▪
|
personal qualities such as leadership, statesmanship and responsiveness;
|
|
▪
|
general management qualities such as a global perspective on our business, strategic thinking and planning, knowledge of our business and preparedness;
|
|
▪
|
financial expertise such as value creation, capital planning, and communications with the financial investment communities; and
|
|
▪
|
qualities relating to the use of human resources such as developing management talent and creating an effective organization.
|
Director Compensation
Effective July 2019, our Compensation Committee recommended, and our Board of Directors approved, the following compensation for our non-employee directors.
Each of our non-employee directors receives an annual cash retainer of $60,000, paid quarterly. Pursuant to the 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan, each of our non-employee directors is also awarded annual equity-based compensation in the form of restricted stock units valued at $115,000 on the date of grant to vest one year from date of grant; such awards are granted at the Board meeting following the Annual Stockholders meeting. In addition, upon first being elected to our Board, outside directors receive a grant of restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $115,000. Each of our non-employee directors, with the exception of Ms. Andrew, has elected to waive the receipt of compensation pursuant to our non-employee director compensation program. The following table sets forth the compensation received by Ms. Andrew during the fiscal year 2019.
|
Name
|
Fees earned or paid in Cash
(1)
|
Stock Awards(2)
|
Total
|
|||
|
Anne S. Andrew
|
$15,000
|
$115,000
|
$130,000
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Reflects pro-rated independent director cash compensation based on Ms. Andrew’s appointment on October 16, 2019 and 11,241 restricted stock units that vest one year from the date of grant.
|
|
(2)
|
The amount disclosed in this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the 11,241 restricted unit awards granted to Ms. Andrew. Such restricted stock units vest one year from the date of grant. The grant date fair values of restricted stock units granted for fiscal year 2019 were determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718 and are based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Under SEC rules, the grant date fair values exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
|
Five Percent Owners
The following table reflects certain information known to us concerning persons beneficially owning more than 5% of our outstanding common stock based on the most recent information filed with the SEC by the persons listed. The security ownership percentage is calculated based on our shares of common stock outstanding as of the close of business on
February 28, 2020
. Unless otherwise noted, each stockholder listed below has sole voting and disposition power with respect to the shares listed.
16
|
Name and Address
|
Number of
Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent
of Class |
||||
|
Energy Capital Partners III, LLC(1)
51 John F. Kennedy Parkway, Suite 200 Short Hills, NJ 07078 |
38,352,957
|
|
45.7
|
%
|
||
|
Newlight Partners LP(2)
390 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022-4608 |
9,635,161
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
||
|
Entities Affiliated with Elk Mountain Ltd.(3)
100 Waugh Drive #400 Houston, TX 77007 |
4,455,660
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
||
|
(1)
|
The information set forth above was obtained from a Schedule 13G dated February 10, 2020, filed with the SEC jointly by ECP ControlCo, LLC (“ControlCo”), Energy Capital Partners III, LLC (“Energy Capital Partners”), Energy Capital Partners GP III, LP (“ECP GP”), Energy Capital Partners III, LP (“ECP III”), Energy Capital Partners III-A, LP (“ECP-A”), Energy Capital Partners III-B, LP (”ECP-B”), Energy Capital Partners III-C, LP (“ECP-C”), Energy Capital Partners III-D, LP (“ECP-D”), Energy Capital Partners GP III Co-Investment (Sunnova), LLC (“ECP Co-Invest GP”) and Energy Capital Partners III (Sunnova Co-Invest), LP (“ECP Co-Invest” and, collectively with ECP III, ECP-A, ECP-B, ECP-C and ECP-D, the “ECP Holders”). ECP III directly holds 528,150 shares of our common stock, ECP-A directly holds 17,779,378 shares of our common stock, ECP-B directly holds 2,147,150 shares of our common stock, ECP-C directly holds 7,350,272 shares of our common stock, ECP-D directly holds 9,071,496 shares of our common stock and ECP Co-Invest directly holds 1,476,511 shares of our common stock. The shares were issued to the ECP Holders in our initial public offering in exchange for preferred shares of our predecessor entity held by the ECP Holders prior to the initial public offering. Each of ECP, ECP-A, ECP-B, ECP-C and ECP-D is controlled by its general partner, ECP GP. ECP GP is controlled by its general partner, Energy Capital Partners. ECP Co-Invest is managed by its general partner, ECP Co-Invest GP, which is managed by its sole member, Energy Capital Partners. Energy Capital Partners is wholly owned and controlled by ControlCo. Douglas W. Kimmelman, Peter Labbat, Tyler Reeder, Andrew D. Singer and Rahman D’Argenio are the managing members ControlCo and share the power to direct the voting and disposition of the shares beneficially owned by Energy Capital Partners. Each such individual disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
|
|
(2)
|
The information set forth above concerning shares of common stock beneficially owned by Newlight Partners LP (“Newlight”) was obtained from a Schedule 13G dated February 12, 2020, filed with the SEC jointly by Newlight, Newlight GP, LLC, Ravi Yadav and David Wassong. QSIP LP directly holds
9,635,161
shares of our common stock. The shares were issued to QSIP LP in our initial public offering in exchange for preferred shares of our predecessor entity held by QSIP LP or one of its affiliates prior to the initial public offering. Pursuant to an investment management agreement, QSIP LP and certain of its affiliates have delegated sole voting and dispositive power over the shares to Newlight Partners LP. The general partner of Newlight Partners LP is Newlight GP LLC. The sole members of Newlight GP LLC are Ravi Yadav and David Wassong.
|
|
(3)
|
Consists of
3,954,579
shares of common stock held by Elk Mountain Ltd. and
501,081
shares of common stock held by Minion Trail Ltd. Elk Mountain Ltd. and Minion Trail Ltd. are collectively controlled by Russell Gordy, a former director of Sunnova Energy Corporation.
|
Director and Executive Officer Shareholdings
The following table sets forth the amount of common stock beneficially owned as of the close of business on
February 28, 2020
, by each of our directors and by each of the executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table below (named executive officers), and by all of our directors and executive officers as a group. For our directors and executive officers, the information includes shares
17
that they could acquire through April 28, 2020 by the exercise of stock options. As of
February 28, 2020
, none of the shares shown below were pledged. Unless otherwise indicated below, each of the named persons and members of the group has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.
|
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Number of
Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent
of Class |
||||
|
Anne S. Andrew (2)
|
15,000
|
|
*
|
|
||
|
Walter A. Baker (3)
|
150,019
|
|
*
|
|
||
|
William J. Berger (4)
|
1,991,230
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
||
|
Rahman D'Argenio (5)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Matthew DeNichilo
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand (6)
|
263,860
|
|
*
|
|
||
|
Doug Kimmelman (5)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Robert L. Lane (7)
|
15,000
|
|
*
|
|
||
|
Mark Longstreth (8)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Michael C. Morgan (9)
|
1,971,875
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
||
|
John T. Santo Salvo (10)
|
190,551
|
|
*
|
|
||
|
C. Park Shaper (11)
|
1,753,199
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
||
|
Scott D. Steimer
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (15 Persons) (12)
|
6,692,548
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
||
___________
* Represents beneficial ownership or voting power of less than 1%.
|
(1)
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each listed stockholder is: c/o Sunnova Energy international Inc., 20 East Greenway Plaza, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77046.
|
|
(2)
|
Consists of
15,000
shares of common stock purchased in the open market.
|
|
(3)
|
Consists of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
|
(4)
|
Consists (i)
31,564
owned by Mr. Berger, (ii)
176,653
owned by Jackson Leigh Ventures LLC for which Mr. Berger serves as managing member, (iii)
7,471
held in the executive’s IRA, and (iv)
1,775,542
shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. D’Argenio and Mr. Kimmelman are each a Managing Member of ControlCo, LLC and may be deemed to beneficially own shares owned by ControlCo and certain of its sponsored funds (the “ECP Funds”), which collectively own
38,352,957
shares of common stock. Mr. Kimmelman and Mr. D’Argenio disclaim beneficial ownership of any common stock beneficially owned by the ECP Funds.
|
|
(6)
|
Consists of (i)
1,000
shares of common stock purchased in the open market and (ii)
262,860
shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
|
(7)
|
Consists of
15,000
shares of common stock purchased in the open market.
|
|
(8)
|
Mr. Longstreth is a Partner at Newlight Partners LP (“Newlight Partners”) and may be deemed to beneficially own shares owned by QSIP LP. Mr. Longstreth disclaims beneficial ownership of any common stock beneficially owned by QSIP or Newlight Partners.
|
|
(9)
|
Consists of (i)
1,852,757
shares held by Triangle Peak Partners II, LP and TPP II Annex Fund, LP, for which Mr. Morgan serves as Chairman and CEO of the managing entity of such funds, (ii)
94,118
shares held by Portcullis Partners, LP, for which Mr. Morgan serves as President and (iii)
25,000
shares held Porticullis Investments, LP, for which Mr. Morgan serves as Manager of the general partner.
|
|
(10)
|
Consists of (i)
1,000
shares of common stock purchased in the open market, (ii)
6
shares of
|
18
common stock held indirect and (iii)
189,545
shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
|
(11)
|
Consists of
1,753,199
shares held by SEIS Holdings LLC for which Mr. Shaper serves as CEO. Mr. Shaper may be deemed to beneficially own securities beneficially owned by SEIS Holdings LLC.
|
|
(12)
|
Consists of (i)
3,972,768
shares of common stock beneficially owned by our named executive officers and (ii)
2,719,780
shares of common stock issuable from the exercise of stock options pursuant to the prior options plans.
|
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth our executive officers, the office held by such officer, the date of first election to that office and the age of each officer as of the close of business on
February 28, 2020
.
|
Name
|
Position
|
Date of First
Appointment |
Age
|
|||
|
William J. Berger
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
November 2012
|
46
|
|||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
May 2019
|
48
|
|||
|
Stuart D. Allen
|
Executive Vice President, Human Resources
|
May 2018
|
56
|
|||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
January 2018
|
58
|
|||
|
Michael P. Grasso
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
|
April 2018
|
49
|
|||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
Executive Vice President of Technology and Service Operations
|
October 2017
|
56
|
|||
|
Meghan Nutting
|
Executive Vice President, Policy and Communications
|
April 2018
|
39
|
|||
|
John T. Santo Salvo
|
Executive Vice President of Channel Operations and Chief Procurement Officer
|
April 2018
|
54
|
|||
No family relationship exists between any of our executive officers or directors. All of our executive officers serve at the pleasure of our Board and may be removed at any time with or without cause.
William J. (John) Berger
founded Sunnova Energy Corporation in 2012 and has since then served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board. On April 1, 2019, he was elected as Sunnova Energy International Inc.’s President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board. With more than two decades of experience in the electric power industry, Mr. Berger is an energy entrepreneur who has always supported free market competition, consumer choice and the advancement of energy technology to power energy independence. Before Sunnova, Mr. Berger served as Founder and Chief Executive Officer at SunCap Financial, a residential solar service provider. He also founded Standard Renewable Energy, a provider and installer of renewable energy and energy-efficient products and services. Mr. Berger received his Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School and graduated cum laude from Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in civil engineering.
Robert L. Lane
joined Sunnova Energy Corporation in May 2019 as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and was elected as one of Sunnova Energy International Inc.'s executive officers on July 10, 2019. Prior to joining Sunnova, Mr. Lane served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spark Energy, Inc., a publicly traded retail energy services company, from June 2016 to April 2019. Mr. Lane previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of Emerge Energy Services GP, LLC, the
19
general partner of Emerge Energy Services LP, from November 2012 to June 2015. From December 2011 to November 2012, Mr. Lane was a Managing Director at Global Hunter Securities LLC, where he was responsible for the origination and execution of capital markets and M&A transactions in the midstream industry. Mr. Lane previously served in various roles, most recently as Managing Director, of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. and its affiliates from November 2004 to December 2011, where he led equity research and then investment banking coverage of midstream energy companies, particularly master limited partnerships. Mr. Lane is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Financial Analyst. Mr. Lane received his Master of Business Administration from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and his Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University. He also received a Certificate in the Accountancy Program from the B.T. Bauer School of Business at the University of Houston.
Stuart D. Allen
joined Sunnova Energy Corporation in June 2018 as Executive Vice President, Human Resources and was elected as one of Sunnova Energy International Inc.’s executive officers on July 10, 2019. Mr. Allen previously served as Vice President, Human Resources and Administrative Services of Atwood Oceanics, Inc., a publicly traded offshore drilling company (“Atwood”), from April 2014 to October 2017. Mr. Allen also served as Director, Human Resources of Atwood from July 2013 to April 2014. He joined Atwood in 2008 as the Area Manager-HR Services based in Perth, Australia. Mr. Allen has also held various operations, management and human resources roles at Katanga Mining Ltd. from 2007 to 2008 and at Alcoa World Alumina LLC from 1994 to 2007. Mr. Allen has over three decades of experience in various industries including minerals extraction and offshore drilling. He has held senior positions in operations and general management, human resources, organizational development, labor relations, training and administrative roles. Mr. Allen holds a Master’s Degree in Industrial Relations, a Post Graduate Degree in Education, and a Bachelor’s Degree in Physiology and Industrial Relations from the University of Western Australia.
Walter A. Baker
joined Sunnova Energy Corporation in January 2018, as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and was elected as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Sunnova on April 19, 2018, and was elected as one of Sunnova Energy International Inc.'s executive officers on July 10, 2019. Mr. Baker previously served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Atwood from January 2015 to October 2017 and as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Atwood from February 2011 to January 2015. Mr. Baker brings over 25 years of legal experience to Sunnova, having served as the general counsel or in other executive legal roles in both public and private companies. Mr. Baker received his Juris Doctor from the University of Texas at Austin and graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree from Vanderbilt University.
Michael Grasso
joined Sunnova Energy Corporation in January 2018, as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. He has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer since April 2018, and was elected as one of Sunnova Energy International Inc.’s executive officers on July 10, 2019. Mr. Grasso previously served as Chief Marketing Officer of Sunrun Inc., a publicly traded provider of residential solar electricity, from 2014 to 2017 and as Chief Marketing Officer of TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, a provider of residential, commercial, and industrial electricity (“TXU”), from 2009 to 2014. Mr. Grasso held various executive and brand management roles at the United Services Automobile Association from 2007 to 2008 and at AT&T Inc. from 1992 to 2007. Mr. Grasso brings to Sunnova more than two decades of marketing experience with companies in the energy, financial services, internet, video and telecommunications industries. Mr. Grasso received his Master of Science degree in Telecommunications Management from Washington University and his Bachelor of Arts degree in Computer Science and Applied Statistics from St. Mary’s University.
Kris Hillstrand
joined Sunnova Energy Corporation in December 2015, as Senior Vice President, Information Technology and Customer Operations. He has served as Executive Vice President of Technology and Service Operations of Sunnova Energy Corporation since April 2018, and was elected
20
as one of Sunnova Energy International Inc.’s executive officers on July 10, 2019. Mr. Hillstrand previously served in various partner and officer roles at professional service and technology firms, including Accenture plc, Deloitte LLP, Science Applications International Corporation and HCL Technologies Limited, as Senior Vice President-Operations of TXU from 2006 to 2009, and as Chief Information Officer of TXU from 2005 to 2009. Mr. Hillstrand brings to Sunnova over 28 years of experience leading firms in technology, power generation and energy services. Mr. Hillstrand received both Masters of Business Administration degrees in Finance and graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from the University of Connecticut.
Meghan Nutting
joined Sunnova Energy Corporation in May 2015, as Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs. She has served as Executive Vice President, Policy and Communications since April 2018 and was elected as one of Sunnova Energy International Inc.’s executive officers on July 10, 2019. Since 2014, Ms. Nutting has also served as the Founder and President of Altitude Strategies Consulting, a consulting agency for both for-profit companies and non-profit organizations on energy-related policy issues. Ms. Nutting previously served as the Director of Policy and Electric Markets at SolarCity Corporation, a publicly traded provider of solar energy services, from 2009 to 2014. Ms. Nutting has also served in various legislative, policy and management positions in both the public and private sectors. Ms. Nutting received her Master of Public Affairs degree from Princeton University and her Bachelor of Arts degree in Biology from Cornell University.
John Santo Salvo
joined Sunnova Energy Corporation in February 2016 as Vice President, Asset Management and was elected as Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations on July 20, 2017. He has served as Executive Vice President of Channel Operations and Chief Procurement Officer since April 2018, and was elected as one of Sunnova Energy International Inc.’s executive officers on July 10, 2019. Mr. Santo Salvo previously served as the Head of Logistics of Dresser-Rand, an engineering and manufacturing company owned by German conglomerate Siemens (“Dresser-Rand”), beginning in 2013 and as Dresser-Rand’s Director, Global Technical Services from 2008 to 2013. Mr. Santo Salvo also served in various operations, logistics, and management positions in the United States Navy from 1988 to 2008, from which he retired with the rank of Commander. Mr. Santo Salvo received his Masters of Business Administration degree from the University of Kansas and is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy.
21
PROPOSAL NO. 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Section 14A of the Exchange Act provides that stockholders must be given the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as an advisory vote on executive compensation. By voting with respect to this Proposal No. 2, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation once every one, two, or three years. Stockholders also may, if they wish, abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.
Our Board has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our stockholders to provide timely, direct input on the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. Our Board believes that an annual vote is therefore consistent with the Company’s efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue with our stockholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters.
The Company recognizes that our stockholders may have different views as to the best approach for the Company, and therefore we look forward to hearing from our stockholders as to their preferences on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation.
This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board in any way. Our Board and Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote, however, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, our Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our stockholders.
The proxy card provides stockholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the vote every one, two or three years, or abstaining) and, therefore, stockholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of our Board.
Recommendation of our Board
Our Board recommends that you vote for the option of “ONE YEAR” as the preferred frequency for advisory votes on executive compensation.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with “Executive Compensation” included elsewhere in this proxy statement. In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, “named executive officers or NEOs” refers to our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below.
Executive Summary
Our executive compensation program reflects our commitment to best practices in compensation governance, and alignment of pay with Company performance, all while allowing us to attract and retain highly qualified executives. Our program is designed to motivate our executives to achieve important
22
business objectives and to reward them for creating long-term value for our stockholders by delivering superior operational and financial performance.
We believe our executive compensation program includes features that effectively align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and excludes features that may result in misalignment. Important features of our executive compensation programs and practices are provided in the following table:
|
What We Do
|
What We Don’t Do
|
|
|
We do
conduct an annual review of our compensation strategy, including a risk assessment of our executive compensation practices
We do
maintain a compensation philosophy that targets total direct compensation for our NEOs within a competitive market range of the market 50
th
percentile
We do
maintain clawback provisions in our long-term incentive awards that allow for the forfeiture or recovery of stock or amounts paid or payable in the event the Company or the Committee determines an NEO has taken unlawful action detrimental to the Company or violated Company policy
We do
base short-term incentive awards primarily on quantitative metrics
We do
maintain compensation plans designed to align our executive compensation program with long-term stockholder interests
We do
retain an independent compensation consultant that does not perform any services for management (retained by and reporting to our Compensation Committee)
|
We don’t
allow our executives to hedge, sell short or hold derivative instruments tied to our shares (other than options issued by us)
We don’t
allow our executives or directors to pledge Company shares
We don’t
maintain change-of-control tax gross-ups in our change of control agreements
We don’t
provide for liberal share counting in our Long-Term Incentive Plan
We don’t
allow repricing of underwater stock options without stockholder approval
We don’t
provide employment agreements to our NEOs
|
|
Overview of Fiscal Year
2019
Our results during the fiscal year ended 2019 reinforce our confidence in the strategies we are implementing to grow the business and deliver value to our stockholders. In particular, we had the following notable achievements in 2019:
|
•
|
Closed our IPO of Company common stock in July 2019;
|
|
•
|
Met or exceeded all of our 2019 guidance targets;
|
|
•
|
Added more than 18,000 new customers in 2019 to increase our total to 78,600, a 30% increase year-over-year;
|
|
•
|
Finished the year with a battery attachment rate on origination of 24% for fourth quarter 2019;
|
|
•
|
Expanded product offerings and increased market footprint;
|
|
•
|
Successfully executed our safe harbor strategy; and
|
|
•
|
Closed a number of financing transactions, including
|
|
◦
|
$190 million of tax equity
|
|
◦
|
$133 million private placement
|
|
◦
|
$168 million loan securitization
|
|
◦
|
$450 million in new and expanded secured credit agreements
|
|
◦
|
$138 million safe harbor facility
|
|
◦
|
$55 million convertible senior debt
|
23
The Role of Our Compensation Committee
Our executive compensation program is administered by our Compensation Committee. All of the members of our Compensation Committee are independent as required by the NYSE, and are "non-employee directors" as defined by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our Compensation Committee currently consists of three members: Rahman D’ Argenio (Chair), Mark Longstreth and Michael Morgan. Our Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things, the following:
|
•
|
determining and approving (i) compensation of executive officers, including our named executive officers (other than the President and Chief Executive Officer), and (ii) both long-term and short-term incentive compensation and equity-based plans for all of our employees;
|
|
•
|
recommending to our Board the compensation of our non-employee directors;
|
|
•
|
reviewing and approving Company goals and objectives relevant to our President and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluating our President and Chief Executive Officer's performance in light of those goals and objectives, and making recommendations to the independent directors regarding our President and Chief Executive Officer's compensation level based on this evaluation;
|
|
•
|
reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s compensation policies and practices in order to produce our Compensation Committee report included in this proxy statement;
|
|
•
|
reviewing the Company’s incentive compensation arrangements to determine whether they encourage excessive risk-taking; and
|
|
•
|
performing such general oversight and investigation functions related to Company compensation inherent to the responsibilities designated in our Compensation Committee’s charter or set forth in resolutions of our Board.
|
Our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as it deems appropriate, in its sole discretion. For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2019
, following a review of an independence report prepared by Longnecker & Associates (“L&A”), our Compensation Committee engaged L&A as its professional consultant to provide information and advice with respect to competitive practices relevant to our compensation programs and policies. The primary role of L&A is to provide our Compensation Committee with compensation market data and information regarding compensation trends in our industry and to make recommendations regarding the design of our program. Our Compensation Committee believes it is important and beneficial to have independent third-party analysis, and L&A has extensive experience in providing executive compensation advice. Our Compensation Committee considered the discussions with and guidance from L&A, as well as the compensation studies created and assembled by L&A, in making competitive compensation decisions. L&A does not provide to our Compensation Committee any services or advice on matters unrelated to compensation and reports directly to and takes direction from the Chair of our Compensation Committee. In accordance with the Corporate Governance Standards of the NYSE, our Compensation Committee has determined that L&A is independent from management and that the advice provided by L&A with regard to executive compensation is free from any relationships that could impair the professional advice or compromise the integrity of the information and data provided to our Compensation Committee. Management does not direct or oversee the retention or activities of L&A with respect to our executive compensation program and did not engage L&A in any other capacity for fiscal year 2019.
24
Our Compensation Committee may delegate its responsibilities to one or more individual Compensation Committee members to the extent permitted by law, the listing standards of the NYSE and our Compensation Committee’s charter.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our Compensation Committee believes the quality and competency of our employees is a key factor that will drive our out-performance of our compensation peer group (discussed below). As a result, a fundamental element of our competitive position is the ability to attract and retain individuals who can successfully lead the organization and drive the execution of our operational and commercial objectives. The compensation programs adopted by our Compensation Committee are intended to provide compensation and incentive opportunities to our executive officers, including named executive officers, and other employees that are competitive and provide the motivation to deliver superior effort and performance in order to increase value for our stockholders. The primary objectives of our compensation program are to provide competitive pay opportunities that are commensurate with the Company’s performance, recognize individual contributions and achievements, and retain and attract qualified employees and executive officers, including our named executive officers, who are focused on our near-term goals and long-term success. For our executive officers, a percentage of compensation is dependent on individual and company performance.
Specifically, the executive compensation program is designed to:
|
•
|
ensure that the compensation program supports the achievement of our short-term and long-term strategic plans by retaining and attracting executive officers critical to our long-term success;
|
|
•
|
reward each of our executive officers for long-term strategic management and for their individual contributions to enhance stockholder value;
|
|
•
|
offer incentives to motivate performance with respect to individual and company-wide goals and metrics, as well as our performance relative to our competitors; and
|
|
•
|
focus the commitment of our executive officers on the long-term interests of our stockholders through equity awards.
|
Periodically, our Compensation Committee reviews the objectives and components of our executive compensation program to ensure they are appropriate and achieve their intended purpose, while allowing us to keep compensation costs manageable. To establish compensation parameters for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, our Compensation Committee evaluated the information provided by L&A relative to a compensation peer group (discussed below), including each element of compensation separately and the total direct compensation (the combined value of annual base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentive grants) for each executive officer. It is our belief that while the market 50th percentile represents a desirable benchmark for each of the components of our compensation program, an individual component as well as the combined value represented by total direct compensation can exceed the market 50th percentile, provided that certain factors are met, most notably, superior Company performance as compared to our compensation peer group. From the data and analysis provided by L&A, our Compensation Committee concluded that, for fiscal year 2019, overall base salaries, target annual incentives, and the value of long-term incentives (excluding a special one time grant to Mr. Berger in connection with our IPO) for our named executive officers are aligned between the market 50th percentile and market 75
th
percentile of our compensation peer group. Moreover, our Compensation Committee determined that our process for determining executive compensation is aligned with stockholder interests with a percentage of executive pay being at risk and contingent on Company performance.
25
Considerations
In making compensation determinations relative to our executive officers, our Compensation Committee takes into account the following important considerations:
Company Results
We believe that the compensation provided to our executive officers should be closely related to the Company’s overall results as measured against goals approved by our Board each year. Our Compensation Committee evaluates each individual executive officer’s overall contribution to the Company’s ongoing and long-term performance and approves performance targets, which include commercial and financial measures, and also establishes incentive compensation targets for each individual executive officer, expressed as a percentage of annual base salary. Compensation targets are correlated with competitive market data and provide for differentiation in job responsibilities.
Individual Performance
At the beginning of fiscal year 2019, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Berger, made recommendations to our Compensation Committee for the individual performance objectives for each executive officer, other than himself, based upon the responsibilities assigned to each executive. These objectives included both objective factors such as the executive’s role in achieving the goals and metrics considered in the formula-based portion of the bonus discussed below, as well as subjective factors such as overall corporate results, customer count, service and operational excellence, creating a culture of problem solving and employee retention.
Competitive Benchmarking
Our Compensation Committee considers competitive industry data in making executive pay determinations and utilizes an executive compensation benchmarking peer group of companies (“compensation peer group”) which our Compensation Committee believes is the most appropriate benchmarking peer group. The compensation peer group was developed with the input of L&A and includes some of the larger solar and renewable energy companies with which we compete for business and talent as well as other relevant companies with levels of revenues and assets similar to ours. The Compensation Committee will review and refine the compensation peer group periodically, as appropriate, based on, among other things, the recommendations made by L&A.
The six companies include:
|
•
|
Clearway Energy, Inc.;
|
|
•
|
Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.;
|
|
•
|
Pattern Energy Group Inc.;
|
|
•
|
SunPower Corporation;
|
|
•
|
Sunrun Inc.; and
|
|
•
|
Vivint Solar, Inc.
|
Components of Our Executive Compensation Program
In order to achieve the objectives of our executive compensation program, we have developed a balanced compensation package consisting of base salary, annual cash incentive bonus and long-term stock incentive awards. Our Compensation Committee may vary, from time to time, the composition and structure of the compensation program, the allocation among components and the criteria associated with each component. The incorporation of cash and equity elements is intended to balance the reward associated with short-term performance with the potential for achieving longer term results, as well as
26
with effective retention. The mix of pay elements is relevant to the compensation determinations made by our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee utilized information provided by L&A in the analysis of each component and the mix of these components as compared to our compensation peer group. In addition, each of our named executive officers are provided with change-in-control agreements, perquisites and benefits. Each one of these elements of compensation serves a particular purpose, as discussed below.
For 2019, our executive compensation program consisted of five components:
|
•
|
base salaries;
|
|
•
|
annual cash incentive bonuses;
|
|
•
|
long-term stock-based incentive compensation;
|
|
•
|
change-in-control arrangements; and
|
|
•
|
perquisites and benefits.
|
Base Salaries
Base salaries, which are tied to the fiscal year, compensate our executive officers for services rendered and are set in proportion to the job responsibilities of each individual. At the discretion of our Compensation Committee, the salaries of our executive officers are generally reviewed following the end of each fiscal year in recognition of individual performance and to reflect our desired position in the competitive market. We seek to compensate for market movement of salaries in our compensation peer group, utilizing data provided by L&A relative to competitive trends and other relevant information to determine individual salary adjustments as warranted. For positions in which compensation peer group proxy data is available, L&A’s data is weighted 50% on compensation peer group proxy data and 50% on published survey data. For positions in which compensation peer group proxy data is unavailable, 100% published survey data is used. Individual circumstances can allow for certain positions to be above or below the market 50th percentile of our compensation peer group, with our Compensation Committee also considering years in the applicable position, level of expertise and responsibilities, ordinal rank of pay level for each executive, our overall financial condition and industry conditions, as well as a subjective assessment of individual performance. Mr. Berger’s salary is determined by our Compensation Committee and is approved by the Company’s independent directors acting as a group, whereas the salaries of other executive officers are determined and approved by our Compensation Committee with input and recommendations from Mr. Berger. The following are the base salaries for named executive officers for the 2019 calendar year.
|
Name
|
2019
Base Salary (1) |
|||
|
William J. Berger
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Lane
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
Walter A. Baker
|
$
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
John Santo Salvo
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Mr. Berger’s base salary increase was effective on July 29, 2019 in connection with the closing of the IPO. Mr. Lane’s base salary was effective upon his hiring on May 22, 2019. Mr. Baker’s base salary increase was effective on April 1, 2019. Messrs. Hillstrand and Santo Salvo’s salaries were not adjusted during fiscal year 2019. Prior to the effective dates, Mr. Berger’s salary was $425,000, and Mr. Baker’s salary was $300,000.
|
27
Changes for 2020.
Our Compensation Committee elected not to make any changes in base salary for fiscal year 2020.
Annual Incentive Bonuses
We provide incentive compensation to our executive officers in the form of an annual cash incentive bonus relating to financial, operational and individual achievements during the prior fiscal year for the purpose of rewarding and recognizing their contributions toward approved Company goals and metrics, encouraging further individual contributions to stockholder value. The graphic below illustrates how the bonus is calculated including the weighing of the corporate metrics.
Fiscal Year 2019 Design
|
Base
($)
|
x
|
Target
Annual
Incentive
Opportunity
(%)
|
(
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
plus P&I
|
+
|
Adjusted
Operating
Cash
Flows
|
+
|
Increase in
adjusted GCV
as compared
to 12/31/18
|
+
|
Originated
customer
count as of
12/31/19
|
)
|
x
|
Individual
performance
factor
|
|
(weighted 35%)
|
(weighted 25%)
|
(weighted 20%)
|
(weighted 20%)
|
||||||||||
The fiscal year 2019 target annual incentive opportunities were determined by our Compensation Committee as a percentage of annual base salary in the range of competitive bonus amounts of our compensation peer group as furnished by L&A. Target annual incentive opportunities are subject to review based on market movement as well as to pro-rata adjustment due to promotions occurring during the fiscal year or other relevant changes in job responsibilities. The following target annual incentive opportunities represented as a percentage of annual base salaries for the 2019 fiscal year were effective April 1, 2019 for each of the named executive officers, other than Mr. Berger’s and Mr. Hillstrand’s adjustments which were effective in connection with the closing of the IPO, and Mr. Lane’s which was effective upon his hiring on May 22, 2019.
|
Name
|
% Base
Salary(1) |
||
|
William J. Berger
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
Robert L. Lane
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
Walter A. Baker
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
John Santo Salvo
|
75
|
%
|
|
__________
|
(1)
|
Prior to the closing of the IPO, Mr. Berger’s target annual incentive opportunity as a percentage of base salary was 175% and Mr. Hillstrand’s was 100%.
|
Our Compensation Committee structured the annual incentive bonus to be formulaic and directly linked to the achievement of Company-wide goals and metrics and individual objectives approved by our Board. The final determinations of the annual incentive bonus are based upon the extent to which results for the fiscal year met, failed to meet or exceeded our established goals and metrics. The goals and metrics for the Company include results related to financial performance, and operational performance, as well as approved individual goals and objectives for each executive officer.
Our Compensation Committee believes that the individual performance measure ensures that our executive officers focus on a broader, more strategic set of financial, operational and other factors which are focused on stockholder value creation and our long-term success. The Committee’s
28
assessment of this measure enables closer alignment of executive officer pay levels with stockholder value creation and talent attraction, motivation and retention in a challenging competitive environment. Our Compensation Committee seeks input from Mr. Berger on executive officer performance and internal equity for executive officers other than himself. In determining the individual bonus amounts paid to our executive officers, following review of fiscal year 2019 results and individual performance, our Compensation Committee also reviewed information provided by L&A with regard to compensation practices, trends, and target levels of compensation within our compensation peer group.
Company Goals and Metrics
Prior to our IPO, recommendations for the Company's goals and metrics were made by Mr. Berger to the Board of Directors of Sunnova Energy Corporation, and these recommendations were subsequently reviewed as appropriate and endorsed by our Compensation Committee in connection with the IPO. In determining the goals and metrics for fiscal year 2019, the Committee linked the metrics to the Company’s budget as approved by our Board. For each performance measure, our Compensation Committee established appropriate metrics and specific targets as shown below. Each metric was associated with a threshold, target and a stretch level of possible achievement. Each performance measure also was assigned a weighting factor to reflect the Company’s goals and priorities as interpreted by our Compensation Committee. In consultation with L&A, our Compensation Committee put in place payment guidelines for the level of achievement for each metric, threshold (50%), target (100%) and stretch (150%). This represents the minimum and maximum payout opportunity for each metric and aligns with best practice. In the event a metric does not meet the threshold performance level, none of the bonus is earned for that metric. Similarly, achieving the stretch performance level earns the maximum percentage for a metric. In the event that a metric was achieved at a level between defined achievement levels, our Compensation Committee makes a linear interpolation to determine the bonus earned for that metric.
|
Metric
|
Weight
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Stretch
|
||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I
|
35%
|
$69M
|
$78M
|
$87M
|
||||
|
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow
|
25%
|
($9.80M)
|
($800k)
|
$8.2M
|
||||
|
Increase in Adjusted GCCV Compared to 12/31/18
|
20%
|
$350M
|
$425M
|
$500M
|
||||
|
Number of Customers as of 12/31/19
|
20%
|
74.3k
|
79.3k
|
84.3k
|
||||
Adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I
. Adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I is equal to Adjusted EBITDA plus interest income from customer notes receivable and principal proceeds from customer notes receivable net of related revenue. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus net interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense, income tax expense, financing deal costs, disaster losses and related charges, net, amortization of payments to dealers for exclusivity and other bonus arrangements, legal settlements and excluding the effect of certain non-recurring items we do not consider to be indicative of our ongoing operating performance such as, but not limited to, costs of our IPO, losses on unenforceable contracts, losses on extinguishment of long-term debt, realized and unrealized gains and losses on fair value option instruments and other non-cash items such as asset retirement obligation ("ARO") accretion expense and non-cash compensation expense.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure we use as a performance measure. We believe investors and securities analysts also use Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating our operating performance. Our Compensation Committee has chosen this measure as a bonus metric in order to further align the interests of the stockholders and executive management. This measurement is not recognized in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance. The GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA is net income (loss). The presentation of Adjusted
29
EBITDA should not be construed to suggest our future results will be unaffected by non-cash or non-recurring items. In addition, our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to Adjusted EBITDA as calculated by other companies.
We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to management, investors and analysts in providing a measure of core financial performance adjusted to allow for comparisons of results of operations across reporting periods on a consistent basis. These adjustments are intended to exclude items that are not indicative of the ongoing operating performance of the business. Adjusted EBITDA is also used by our management for internal planning purposes, including our consolidated operating budget, and by our Board of Directors in setting performance-based compensation targets. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to but viewed in conjunction with GAAP results, as we believe it provides a more complete understanding of ongoing business performance and trends than GAAP measures alone. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.
Under our loan agreements, the customer obtains financing for the purchase of a solar energy system from us and we agree to operate and maintain the solar energy system throughout the duration of the agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement, the customer makes scheduled principal and interest payments to us and has the option to prepay principal at any time in part or in full. Whereas we typically recognize payments from customers under our leases and power purchase agreements (“PPAs”) as revenue, we recognize payments received from customers under our loan agreements (a) as interest income, to the extent attributable to earned interest on the contract that financed the customer's purchase of the solar energy system; (b) as a reduction of a note receivable on the balance sheet, to the extent attributable to a return of principal (whether scheduled or prepaid) on the contract that financed the customer's purchase of the solar energy system; and (c) as revenue, to the extent attributable to payments for operations and maintenance services provided by us.
While Adjusted EBITDA effectively captures the operating performance of our leases and PPAs, it only reflects the service portion of the operating performance under our loan agreements. We do not consider our types of solar service agreements differently when evaluating our operating performance. In order to present a measure of operating performance that provides comparability without regard to the different accounting treatment among our three types of solar service agreements, we consider interest income from customer notes receivable and principal proceeds from customer notes receivable, net of related revenue, as key performance metrics. We believe these two metrics provide a more meaningful and uniform method of analyzing our operating performance when viewed in light of our other key performance metrics across the three primary types of solar service agreements.
For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), please refer to page 61 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, for interest income from customer notes receivable and principal proceeds from customer notes receivable, net of related revenue, please refer to page 62 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Adjusted Operating Cash Flows
We define Adjusted Operating Cash Flow as net cash used in operating activities plus principal proceeds from customer notes receivable and distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests less payments to dealers for exclusivity and other bonus arrangements, inventory and prepaid inventory purchases and payments of non-capitalized costs related to our IPO. Adjusted Operating Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure we use as a liquidity measure. This measurement is not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of liquidity. The GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted Operating Cash Flow is net cash used in operating activities. We believe Adjusted Operating Cash Flow is a supplemental financial measure useful to
30
management, analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies as an indicator of our ability to internally fund origination activities, service or incur additional debt and service our contractual obligations. We believe investors and analysts will use Adjusted Operating Cash Flow to evaluate our liquidity and ability to service our contractual obligations. However, Adjusted Operating Cash Flow has limitations as an analytical tool because it does not account for all future expenditures and financial obligations of the business or reflect unforeseen circumstances that may impact our future cash flows, all of which could have a material effect on our financial condition and results from operations. In addition, our calculations of Adjusted Operating Cash Flow are not necessarily comparable to liquidity measures presented by other companies. Investors should not rely on these measures as a substitute for any GAAP measure, including net cash used in operating activities. For a reconciliation of Adjusted Operating Cash Flow to net cash used in operating activities see page 62 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Increase in Adjusted Gross Contracted Customer Value Compared to December 31, 2018
Our Compensation Committee believes this metric is important as a performance measure because it illustrates whether we are growing at a sustainable rate. This metric equals the year-end Gross Contracted Customer Value ("GCCV") minus the prior year-end Gross Contracted Customer Value, plus the Realized Gross Contracted Customer Value over the course of the year.
Estimated Gross Contracted Customer Value represents the sum of the present value of the remaining estimated future net cash flows we expect to receive from existing customers during the initial contract term of our leases and PPAs, which are typically 25 years in length, plus the present value of future net cash flows we expect to receive from the sale of related solar renewable energy certificates, either under existing contracts or in future sales, plus the carrying value of outstanding customer loans on our balance sheet. From these aggregate estimated initial cash flows, we subtract the present value of estimated net cash distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests and estimated operating, maintenance and administrative expenses associated with the solar service agreements. These estimated future cash flows reflect the projected monthly customer payments over the life of our solar service agreements and depend on various factors including but not limited to solar service agreement type, contracted rates, expected sun hours and the projected production capacity of the solar equipment installed. For the purpose of calculating this metric, we discount all future cash flows at 6%. The anticipated operating, maintenance and administrative expenses included in the calculation of estimated gross contracted customer value include, among other things, expenses related to accounting, reporting, audit, insurance, maintenance and repairs. In the aggregate, we estimate these expenses are $20 per kilowatt per year initially, with 2% annual increases for inflation. We do not include maintenance and repair costs for inverters and similar equipment as those are largely covered by the applicable product and dealer warranties for the life of the product, but we do include additional cost for energy storage systems, which are only covered by a 10-year warranty.
Realized Gross Contracted Customer Value is equal to revenue plus interest income from customer notes receivable and principal proceeds from customer notes receivable, minus the straight-line revenue adjustment on lease revenue, the lease performance guaranty obligation adjustment, loan performance guarantee obligation, and the EZ PPA adjustment; minus distributions to tax equity investors and operating, maintenance and administrative expenses associated with the solar service agreements, plus impairments. We believe that Realized Gross Contracted Customer Value represents the portion of the Gross Customer Contracted Value that we realize or deplete over the course of the year as we receive net cash flows from existing customers during the initial contract term of our leases and PPAs, from the sale of related solar renewable energy certificates and from payments under our customer loans.
For a reconciliation of Adjusted Gross Contracted Customer Value to revenue, please refer to Appendix A.
31
Number of Customers as of December 31, 2019
Number of customers as of December 31, 2019 reflects the number of customers of our business. The Compensation Committee chose this as a performance measure as it is the primary indicator of Company growth.
We define number of customers to include each customer that is party to an in-service solar service agreement. For our leases, PPAs and loan agreements, in-service means the related solar energy system and, if applicable, energy storage system, must have met all the requirements to begin operation and be interconnected to the electrical grid. For our Sunnova Protect services, in-service means the customer’s system must have met the requirements to have the service activated. We do not include in our number of customers any customer under a lease, PPA or loan agreement for whom we have terminated the contract and removed the solar energy system. We also do not include in our number of customers any customer of our Sunnova Protect services that has been in default under his or her solar service agreement in excess of six months. We track the total number of customers as an indicator of our historical growth and our rate of growth from period to period.
Evaluation of Performance Results
For fiscal year 2019, our Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s overall results against approved corporate performance targets as follows:
Adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I.
For fiscal year
2019
, our Compensation Committee set the target for Adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I at $78 million. We concluded the fiscal year with an adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I of $79.9M which was between our target and stretch goals. As Adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I was between the approved target and the stretch amounts, our Compensation Committee approved a level of payment of the portion of the annual bonus attributable to this metric for each named executive officer as shown below in the table under “Corporate Performance Portion of the Annual Incentive Bonus.”
Adjusted Operating Cash Flows.
Our Compensation Committee set the Adjusted Operating Cash Flows target for fiscal year
2019
at ($800,000). We achieved adjusted operating cash flows of $8.3 million, which was between the approved target and the stretch amounts, our Compensation Committee approved a level of payment of the portion of the annual bonus attributable to this metric for each named executive officer as shown below in the table under “Corporate Performance Portion of the Annual Incentive Bonus”.
Increase in Adjusted Gross Contracted Customer Value.
Our Compensation Committee set the increase in Adjusted Gross Contracted Customer Value target for fiscal 2019 at $425 million. We attained $543 million of Adjusted Gross Contracted Customer Value. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the achievement of this performance measure at the stretch level and authorized the level of payment of the bonus amount attributable to this metric for each named executive officer as shown below in the table under “Corporate Performance Portion of the Annual Incentive Bonus.”
Number of Customers as of
December 31, 2019
.
Our Compensation Committee set the fiscal 2019 target for number of customers as of
December 31, 2019
at 79,300. Actual number of customers as of
December 31, 2019
was 78,600, which was between the approved threshold and the target amounts. Our Compensation Committee approved a level of payment of the portion of the annual bonus attributable to this metric for each named executive officer as shown below in the table under “Corporate Performance Portion of the Annual Incentive Bonus.”
32
Corporate Performance Portion of the Annual Incentive Bonus
At the end of fiscal year
2019
, our Compensation Committee completed the evaluation of our results and the weighing of metrics discussed above to ensure that the corporate performance portion of the incentive bonus determinations was appropriate and commensurate with the accomplishments posted. The corporate performance multiplier for fiscal year 2019 for named executive officers was as follows:
|
Corporate Goals and Metrics
|
Metric Performance Scale
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Metric
|
Weight
|
Threshold
50% |
Target
100% |
Stretch
150% |
Final
Results |
Performance
Level Achieved |
Performance
Level Payout |
Weighted
Payout |
|||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA, plus P&I
|
35%
|
$69M
|
$78M
|
$87M
|
$79.90M
|
Between
Target and Stretch |
111%
|
38.69
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow
|
25%
|
($9.80M)
|
($800k)
|
$8.2M
|
$8.3M
|
Stretch
|
150%
|
37.5
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Increase in Adjusted GCCV Compared to 12/31/18
|
20%
|
$350M
|
$425M
|
$500M
|
$543M
|
Stretch
|
150%
|
30
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Number of Customers as of 12/31/19
|
20%
|
74.3k
|
79.3k
|
84.3k
|
78.6k
|
Between
Threshold and Target |
93%
|
18.6
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
100%
|
124.79
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
Individual Performance Portion of Annual Incentive Bonus
For each of the executive officers, other than Mr. Berger, our Compensation Committee determined the individual performance portion of the annual incentive bonus by assessing the officer’s performance and contributions both against individual goals and objectives established for each officer at the beginning of the year (or in the case of Mr. Lane, when joining the Company) and against other relevant factors not covered directly by the individual goals and objectives, including, but not limited to, each officer’s performance and contributions to: overall corporate results; execution of our initial public offering; closing of various financing transactions; increase in customers, dealers and sub-dealers; the expansion of product offerings and territory; increase in customer satisfaction results; decrease in field service backlog and other factors as they related to both individual performance and overall Company performance in fiscal year 2019. The competitive compensation data provided by L&A for the position held by each officer was also considered, as appropriate. The executive officers are were ranked 1-5, which results in an individual performance payout multiple range of 0.2 - 1.2. A ranking of 1 results in no bonus award.
For fiscal year 2019, our Compensation Committee recognized the Company’s noteworthy performance as evidenced by its achievements, including the Company’s initial public offering, increase in year over year financial results, closing of financing transactions, and the continued execution of our growth strategy, among other factors. The Committee also considered the Company’s fiscal year 2019 financial results as compared to fiscal year 2018 financial results. The Compensation Committee also assessed the strategic steps taken by management to position the Company for continued success, to enhance stockholder value and to ensure continued financial performance. In recognition of the Company’s excellent performance on all metrics other than the customer count metric, the notable achievements discussed above, each officer’s contributions to the Company’s performance and the
33
Company’s strategic positioning, our Compensation Committee determined to award the individual performance portion of the annual incentive bonus as set forth in the table below.
The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Berger an amount for the individual performance portion of the annual incentive bonus, primarily based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of his personal contributions, his leadership, and the performance of the Company in key functional areas as well as the factors set forth above.
Final Bonus Determination
Our Compensation Committee completed the evaluation of our results and the weighing of metrics discussed above to ensure the incentive bonus determinations, which are intended to reward the performance and contributions of our executive officers, were appropriate and commensurate with the accomplished Company metrics and individual performance. In addition, our Compensation Committee reviewed the market survey information provided by L&A to ensure that the incentive bonus amounts resulting from this evaluation fully support our compensation philosophy and are closely aligned with stockholder interests. Our Compensation Committee made the final bonus determinations for our named executive officers as follows:
|
Mr.
Berger (1) |
Mr.
Lane (2) |
Mr.
Hillstrand (3) |
Mr.
Baker |
Mr.
Santo Salvo |
|||||||||||||||
|
Annual Base Salary
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
$
|
320,000
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
||||
|
Approved Target Annual Incentive Opportunity as % of Annual Salary
|
150
|
%
|
75
|
%
|
75
|
%
|
75
|
%
|
75
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Bonus Target Amount; Target x Annual Base Salary
|
$
|
714,366
|
|
$
|
161,096
|
|
$
|
290,942
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
||||
|
Corporate Performance Multiplier
|
125
|
%
|
125
|
%
|
125
|
%
|
125
|
%
|
125
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Individual Performance Multiplier
|
120
|
%
|
120
|
%
|
120
|
%
|
120
|
%
|
120
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Total Bonus Amount
|
$
|
1,071,550
|
|
$
|
241,644
|
|
$
|
436,413
|
|
$
|
360,000
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
||||
|
Total Bonus Amount as % of Salary
|
238
|
%
|
69
|
%
|
134
|
%
|
113
|
%
|
113
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Total Bonus Amount as % of Target Annual Incentive Opportunity
|
159
|
%
|
92
|
%
|
179
|
%
|
150
|
%
|
150
|
%
|
|||||||||
__________
|
(1)
|
Bonus Target Amount is pro-rated considering a base salary of $425,000 and bonus target of 175% through July 28, 2019 then a base salary of $450,000 and bonus target of 150% as of July 29, 2019.
|
|
(2)
|
Bonus Target Amount is pro-rated based on a hire date of May 22, 2019.
|
|
(3)
|
Bonus Target Amount is pro-rated considering a target of 100% through July 31, 2019 then 75% as of August 1, 2019.
|
Our Compensation Committee’s incentive bonus recommendations were endorsed by L&A based upon its review of relevant competitive information, including analysis of incentive and performance-related bonus amounts paid by our compensation peer group for comparable jobs and of the proportion represented by bonus amounts in the total direct compensation for each benchmarked job. The bonus amounts recommended by our Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2019 range from the market 50th percentile to the market 75th percentile level in recognition of superior Company
34
results in fiscal year 2019 and those items discussed above under Company performance portion of the annual incentive bonus, as well as each officer’s contribution to Company performance and are reflective of our pay for performance compensation philosophy. The proportion represented by the bonus amounts as a percentage of the total direct compensation remains within the overall competitive range. Our Compensation Committee believes that the recommended fiscal year 2019 incentive bonus awards support the objectives of our compensation program.
In order to preserve cash and manage liquidity, our Compensation Committee determined to split the payment of the award 64% in cash and 36% in the form of non-contingent restricted stock units that vest one year from the date of grant. In addition, Mr. Santo Salvo was awarded a special restricted stock units bonus award with a value of $100,000 that will be settled on the same terms in recognition of his superior performance in 2019 in increasing the customer count for 2019.
Long-Term Stock Incentive Awards
Our Compensation Committee considers stock ownership by management through stock-based compensation arrangements beneficial in aligning management’s and stockholders’ interests. Under the provisions of our stockholder-approved Sunnova Energy International Inc. 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”), our Compensation Committee has the ability to grant stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), and performance units to eligible employees and to grant nonqualified stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, SARs and performance units to eligible directors.
Our Compensation Committee grants long-term incentive awards to our executive officers, including our named executive officers, in line with competitive market norms based upon each officer’s performance in a fiscal year. These awards are primarily designed to tie a substantial portion of each executive officer’s compensation to longer-term future performance of the Company and to support the philosophy adopted by our Compensation Committee. The grant determinations are made by our Compensation Committee using, as a reference, the relevant competitive market information and recommendations provided to our Compensation Committee by L&A, in order to provide an appropriate level of total direct compensation compared to compensation of executive officers in our compensation peer group. Our Compensation Committee sets the individual grant values to reflect (a) the level of responsibility of each executive officer and his potential impact on the long-term success of the business, (b) the intent to encourage distinctive levels of long-term performance and contributions, (c) talent retention considerations as appropriate, and (d) tenure with the Company. We do not time the release of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
Predecessor Stock Options
Historically, our executives and key employees, including the NEOs, were granted options to purchase Series B nonvoting common stock of Sunnova Energy Corporation pursuant to the Stock Option Plan of Sunnova Energy Corporation and the 2013 Stock Option Plan of Sunnova Energy Corporation (collectively referred to as the “prior option plans”). The stock options granted pursuant to the prior option plans are referred to herein as the “prior stock options”. In connection with our initial public offering, 50% of the prior stock options that were unexercisable at the time of the initial public offering became exercisable as of the closing of the offering and the remaining 50% of the prior stock options will become exercisable on the first anniversary of the closing of such initial public offering, subject to the holder’s continued employment as of such date and to any other provision of the prior stock option providing for earlier exercisability.
35
In connection with the IPO, the prior options were converted into options to purchase our common stock on the same terms and conditions as were in effect under the prior option plans. Following the IPO, no additional awards will be granted pursuant to the prior option plans.
Determination of Awards
For fiscal year 2019, our Compensation Committee awarded annual grants of restricted stock units to our named executive officers. Our Compensation Committee reviewed information and recommendations provided to our Compensation Committee by L&A, as well as relevant information provided by the Company’s outside legal and tax counsel. We do not time the release of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
To determine long-term incentive awards granted in a year, our Compensation Committee first approves a target aggregate grant date fair value to be awarded to each named executive officer. The target aggregate grant date fair value is then allocated among the types of awards granted for such year. For fiscal year 2019, our Compensation Committee determined to allocate the target aggregate grant date fair value to time-vested restricted stock units.
Restricted Stock Units
Time-vested restricted stock units granted to named executive officers under the 2019 Plan vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant (or, in the case of Mr. Berger, one-seventh increments on each of the first seven anniversaries of the date of grant) provided that the recipient remains employed through the anniversary date, and will be settled in common stock no later than 15 days after the units vest. All outstanding and unvested restricted stock units will vest on the date of a change in control (as defined in the 2019 Plan) or in the event that the officer’s employment is terminated due to death or disability.
Fiscal Year
2019
Long-Term Incentive Award Grants
In May 2019, our Compensation Committee approved granting long-term incentive awards for fiscal year 2019 to our named executive officers as follows:
|
Name
|
Target
Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value |
Restricted(1)
Stock Units |
|||||
|
William J. Berger
|
$
|
10,000,000
|
|
833,333
|
|
||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
62,500
|
|
||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
54,166
|
|
||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
54,166
|
|
||
|
John Santo Salvo
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
37,500
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
These awards were contingent on the closing of the Company’s IPO. For fiscal year 2019, the number of restricted stock units awarded was determined by dividing the target aggregate grant date fair value by the grant date fair value of a restricted stock unit on the date of grant. The grant date fair values of restricted stock units granted for fiscal year 2019 were determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718 and are based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Under SEC rules, the grant date fair values exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
|
36
Fiscal Year
2020
Long-Term Incentive Award Grants
In February 2020, our Compensation Committee recommended granting long-term incentive awards for fiscal year 2020 to our named executive officers as follows:
|
Name
|
Target
Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value(1) |
Restricted
Stock Units(1) |
|||||
|
William J. Berger
(2)
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
$
|
962,500
|
|
83,695
|
|
||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
$
|
893,750
|
|
77,717
|
|
||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
$
|
880,000
|
|
76,521
|
|
||
|
John Santo Salvo
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
52,173
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
For fiscal year 2020, the number of restricted stock units awarded were determined by dividing the target aggregate grant date fair value by the grant date fair value of a restricted stock unit on the date of grant ($11.50). The grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted for fiscal year 2020 were determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718 and were based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Under SEC rules, the grant date fair values exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
|
|
(2)
|
A target aggregate grant date fair value of $2,000,000 was approved for Mr. Berger in May 2019, however due to his restricted stock unit award grant in connection with the IPO in 2019, he is not eligible for consideration of an award grant until the 2022 award cycle.
|
In addition, our Compensation Committee also determined to develop performance awards as part of the long-term incentive award grant for 2021 and to adopt stock ownership guidelines.
Severance Agreements
We believe that the competitive marketplace for executive level talent and our desire to minimize turnover and retain our executive officers, including our named executive officers, requires us to provide certain severance benefits. We also believe the provision of these benefits serves the interests of our stockholders by encouraging certain valued employees to remain employed with the Company in the event of a change of control. The Company has entered into Change of Control Agreements with each named executive officer, including Mr. Berger, in replacement of any prior employment or other severance agreement entered into between the Company and the executive. The agreements standardize change of control benefits for our executive officers and provide benefits that are competitive to those provided by our compensation peer group. Each agreement contains requirements for payments relating to termination of employment other than for cause following a change of control. For more information regarding change of control arrangements, see “Executive Compensation-Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”
Our Compensation Committee believes the provision of such change of control benefits is competitive and appropriate in light of our compensation peer group. In reaching such determination, our Compensation Committee considered L&A’s change of control analysis, surveys, and reviewed the amounts payable by the compensation peer group to similarly situated executives in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change of control.
Benefits relating to termination of employment in a post change of control employment period payable to Mr. Berger and the other named executive officers were considered as part of their overall compensation packages.
37
Perquisites and Benefits
Named executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s benefit plans on the same terms as other employees. The Company’s 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) is a safe harbor qualified defined contribution plan which allows employees, including named executive officers, to save for retirement through a tax-advantaged combination of employee and Company contributions. For safe harbor matching contributions, employee contributions are matched by the Company up to 100% of the first 3% of salary contributed by the employee plus 50% of salary contributed between 3% and 5% of salary contributed. Safe harbor matching contributions are 100% vested. Each year the Company may also make a discretionary profit-sharing contribution to the Retirement Plan, which to date the Company has not made. Profit sharing contributions vest as follows:
|
Years of Service
|
Percentage
|
|
|
› 2
|
0%
|
|
|
2
|
20%
|
|
|
3
|
40%
|
|
|
4
|
60%
|
|
|
5
|
80%
|
|
|
6
|
100%
|
|
The Company also provides named executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that the Company and our Compensation Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program. Such perquisites are detailed in All Other Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
Assessment of Risk and Recovery of Compensation
Our Audit Committee and Board of Directors employ a risk management process conducted periodically to ensure that potential risks that might arise from any of our executive compensation practices and policies do not result in potential adverse impact on the Company, financially or otherwise. Our Compensation Committee has reviewed the policies and guidelines underlying our executive compensation determinations and concluded that the following factors promote the creation of long-term value and thereby discourage behavior that leads to excessive or unnecessary risk:
|
•
|
individual cash incentives are made within the boundaries of approved fixed maximum awards as applicable to each named executive officer;
|
|
•
|
the short-term performance metrics considered in annual bonus determinations are supplemented with diverse performance measures;
|
|
•
|
the members of our Compensation Committee who approve final bonus recommendations are independent; and
|
|
•
|
named executive officers receive the majority of their total direct compensation in the form of long-term incentives with multi-year vesting to align the interests of the named executive officers with long term value creation for our stockholders.
|
Based on our review, we have determined our compensation programs and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, in the event the Company or the Committee determines an NEO has taken unlawful action detrimental to the Company or violated Company policy, we maintain clawback provisions in our long-term incentive awards that allow for the forfeiture or recovery of stock or amounts paid or payable to the NEO.
38
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility of compensation paid to each of our named executive officers to $1 million annually for federal income tax purposes subject to transition relief for compensation arrangements entered into prior to our IPO. In designing compensation plans and making compensation decisions, our Compensation Committee considers the potential deductibility of the proposed compensation. However, our Compensation Committee may elect to approve compensation that exceeds the limit in order to ensure competitive levels of compensation for our executive officers and if it believes that such compensation is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. As a result, certain compensation paid to our named executive officers may not be deductible by the Company for tax purposes. Although the deductibility of compensation is a consideration evaluated by our Compensation Committee, our Compensation Committee believes that the lost deduction on compensation payable in excess of the $1 million limitation is not material relative to the benefit of being able to attract and retain talented management. We have also awarded compensation that might not be fully tax deductible when such grants were nonetheless in the best interest of us and our stockholders. Accordingly, our Compensation Committee will continue to retain the discretion to pay compensation that is subject to the $1 million deductibility limit.
Compensation Committee Report
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with Company management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Amendment. Based on that review and discussion, our Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Amendment.
Compensation Committee:
|
•
|
Rahman D'Argenio - Chair
|
|
•
|
Mark Longstreth
|
|
•
|
Michael C. Morgan
|
39
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
Name and
Principal Position |
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
(2) |
Stock
Awards (3) |
Option
Awards (4) |
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation (5) |
All Other
Compensation (6) |
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
William J. Berger
(President and Chief Executive Officer) |
2019
|
$
|
434,664
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
10,385,758
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,378,358
|
|
$
|
49,031
|
|
$
|
14,247,811
|
|
||||||||
|
2018
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
$
|
37,188
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,085,370
|
|
$
|
632,188
|
|
$
|
4,250
|
|
$
|
2,183,996
|
|
|||||||||
|
2017
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
478,125
|
|
$
|
10,800
|
|
$
|
913,925
|
|
|||||||||
|
Robert L. Lane (1)
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) |
2019
|
$
|
203,045
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
836,992
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
154,652
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
$
|
1,196,001
|
|
||||||||
|
Kris Hillstrand
(Executive Vice President of Technology and Service Operations) |
2019
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
807,109
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
279,304
|
|
$
|
156,921
|
|
$
|
1,568,334
|
|
||||||||
|
2018
|
$
|
317,708
|
|
$
|
16,250
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
164,450
|
|
$
|
276,250
|
|
$
|
67,264
|
|
$
|
841,922
|
|
|||||||||
|
2017
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
$
|
22,500
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
202,500
|
|
$
|
54,650
|
|
$
|
579,650
|
|
|||||||||
|
Walter A. Baker
(Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary) |
2019
|
$
|
314,167
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
779,600
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
230,400
|
|
$
|
11,281
|
|
$
|
1,335,448
|
|
||||||||
|
2018
|
$
|
287,500
|
|
$
|
10,695
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
542,217
|
|
$
|
191,250
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
$
|
1,040,662
|
|
|||||||||
|
John Santo Salvo
(Executive Vice President of Channel Operations and Chief of Procurement) |
2019
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
671,500
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
216,000
|
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
$
|
1,198,700
|
|
||||||||
|
2018
|
$
|
294,167
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
189,750
|
|
$
|
172,125
|
|
$
|
11,000
|
|
$
|
667,042
|
|
|||||||||
|
2017
|
$
|
266,875
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
126,000
|
|
$
|
10,800
|
|
$
|
417,675
|
|
|||||||||
_____________
|
(1)
|
Mr. Lane joined the Company on May 22, 2019, and his compensation reflects pro-ration for his partial year of service.
|
|
(2)
|
The amounts disclosed in this column reflect the non-formulaic cash bonus awards earned for performance in the designated fiscal year but which are paid in March of the following fiscal year.
|
40
|
(3)
|
The amounts disclosed in this column include the grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards granted to each named executive officer. Under SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant ($11.50). For additional information, see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our
2019
Form 10-K. For 2019, the amounts also include the grant date fair value of the restricted stock award granted as part of the Short-Term Incentive Plan compensation as follows:
|
|
Name
|
Grant Date Fair Value of
Short-Term Incentive Award |
Restricted
Stock Units |
|||||
|
William J. Berger
|
$
|
385,758
|
|
33,544
|
|
||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
$
|
86,992
|
|
7,564
|
|
||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
$
|
157,109
|
|
13,661
|
|
||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
$
|
129,600
|
|
11,269
|
|
||
|
John Santo Salvo
(a)
|
$
|
221,500
|
|
19,260
|
|
||
(a)
Includes the grant date fair value of the special bonus award granted to Mr. Santo Salvo.
|
(4)
|
The amounts disclosed in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of non-qualified stock options granted to each named executive officer. Under SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. For additional information, see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our
2019
Form 10-K.
|
|
(5)
|
The amounts disclosed in this column reflect the formulaic cash bonus awards earned for performance in the designated fiscal year but which are paid in March of the following fiscal year. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis Components of Our Executive Compensation Program Annual Incentive Bonuses.” In March 2018, we entered into a Bonus Agreement with Mr. Berger (the “Bonus Agreement”) which provided that each year beginning January 1, 2019, one-fourth of the outstanding loan balance (and related accrued and unpaid interest) under the promissory notes executed by Mr. Berger and Jackson Leigh Ventures, LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Berger, in favor of Sunnova Energy Corporation, in combined aggregate principal amounts totaling $1,702,523 (the “JLV Notes”), was to be forgiven provided that Mr. Berger remained employed through each applicable forgiveness date, such that the full amount of the JLV Notes would be forgiven as of January 1, 2022. In connection with the Bonus Agreement, Mr. Berger’s historical employment agreement was amended to increase his bonus potential to 175% of base salary (from 125% of base salary). In the event that Mr. Berger’s employment was terminated due to his death or permanent disability, the Bonus Agreement provided that the full amount of the then outstanding balance of the JLV Notes (and related accrued interest) would be forgiven. In January 2019, one-fourth of the balance of the JLV Notes was forgiven pursuant to the Bonus Agreement. On June 20, 2019, as additional bonus compensation, the remaining principal and interest in the amount of $1,374,896 associated with the JLV Notes was forgiven, and Sunnova Energy Corporation agreed to pay Mr. Berger a bonus to reimburse him for the expected tax liability associated with such forgiveness of $892,039. Amounts in this column for Mr. Berger for 2018 include a payment of $166,695 made in January 2019 as an advance payment of a portion of Mr. Berger’s bonus otherwise payable in March 2019, and was designed to cover the tax withholding required in connection with loan forgiveness provided under the terms of Mr. Berger’s Bonus Agreement. For 2019, the amount includes, as additional bonus compensation, $1,800,527 associated with the forgiveness of the remaining JLV Notes, and the payment of a bonus as a reimbursement for the expected tax liability associated with such forgiveness of $892,039.
|
41
|
(6)
|
All other compensation for
2019
includes the following amounts:
|
|
Name
|
401(k)
Match (a) |
Dual
Living (b) |
Travel
Reimbursement |
Spousal
Travel (c) |
Prizes -
Gift Cards |
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
William J. Berger
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
37,831
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
49,031
|
|
||||||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
||||||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
$
|
84,946
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
156,921
|
|
||||||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
$
|
11,281
|
|
||||||
|
John Santo Salvo
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
||||||
(a)
Amounts reflect matching contributions made for fiscal year 2019 on behalf of each named executive officer to the Company’s 401(k) plan.
(b)
Amounts reflect payment of Mr. Hillstrand’s living expenses in Houston, TX. Amounts reflect actual cost to the Company and taxes paid by the company associated with the taxable amounts imputed to Mr. Hillstrand.
(c)
Amounts include payment for spousal travel associated with the Company’s IPO. Amounts reflect actual cost to the Company and taxes paid by the Company associated with the taxable amounts imputed to the named executive officer.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS DURING FISCAL YEAR
2019
The following table presents information regarding grants of equity-based awards made to our named executive officers during
2019
.
|
Name
|
Grant
Date |
All Other
Stock Awards: Number of Shares (a) |
Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock Awards (b) |
||||||
|
William J. Berger
|
7/29/2019
|
833,333
|
|
$
|
10,000,000
|
|
|||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
7/29/2019
|
62,500
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
7/29/2019
|
54,166
|
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
|||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
7/29/2019
|
54,166
|
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
|||
|
John Santo Salvo
|
7/29/2019
|
37,500
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|||
|
(a)
|
These restricted stock unit awards were made pursuant to our 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan and vest one third per year over three years except for the award to William J. Berger which vests one seventh per year over seven years.
|
|
(b)
|
The amounts disclosed in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit awards granted to each named executive officer. Under SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and assumes the achievement of target level of performance conditions for the awards. For additional information, see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2019 Form 10-K.
|
42
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Number of
Securities underlying unexercised options exercisable |
Number of
securities underlying unexercised options unexercisable (1) |
Option
exercise price |
Option
expiration date |
Number of
shares or units of stock that have not vested (2) |
Market value
of share or units that have not vested (3) |
|||||||||||||
|
William J. Berger
|
423,469
|
|
47,052
|
|
$
|
24.87
|
|
4/7/2026
|
|||||||||||
|
1,058,673
|
|
117,630
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
4/7/2026
|
||||||||||||
|
24,432
|
|
16,288
|
|
$
|
27.16
|
|
4/2/2028
|
||||||||||||
|
85,897
|
|
57,266
|
|
$
|
13.58
|
|
4/2/2028
|
||||||||||||
|
833,333
|
|
$
|
9,299,996
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
1,592,471
|
|
238,236
|
|
833,333
|
|
$
|
9,299,996
|
|
||||||||||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
62,500
|
|
$
|
697,500
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
62,500
|
|
$
|
697,500
|
|
||||||||||
|
Kris W. Hillstrand
|
62,578
|
|
6,953
|
|
$
|
24.87
|
|
4/7/2026
|
|||||||||||
|
156,446
|
|
17,382
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
4/7/2026
|
||||||||||||
|
3,857
|
|
2,572
|
|
$
|
27.16
|
|
4/2/2028
|
||||||||||||
|
12,858
|
|
8,573
|
|
$
|
13.58
|
|
4/2/2028
|
||||||||||||
|
54,166
|
|
$
|
604,493
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
235,739
|
|
35,480
|
|
54,166
|
|
$
|
604,493
|
|
||||||||||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
38,576
|
|
25,718
|
|
$
|
24.87
|
|
1/2/2028
|
|||||||||||
|
90,012
|
|
60,009
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
1/2/2028
|
||||||||||||
|
54,166
|
|
$
|
604,493
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
128,588
|
|
85,727
|
|
54,166
|
|
$
|
604,493
|
|
||||||||||
|
John Santo Salvo
|
7,530
|
|
1,882
|
|
$
|
24.87
|
|
4/7/2026
|
|||||||||||
|
18,825
|
|
4,707
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
4/7/2026
|
||||||||||||
|
588
|
|
253
|
|
$
|
24.87
|
|
4/15/2027
|
||||||||||||
|
11,412
|
|
4,891
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
4/15/2027
|
||||||||||||
|
48,672
|
|
20,859
|
|
$
|
24.87
|
|
5/15/2027
|
||||||||||||
|
75,010
|
|
32,148
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
5/15/2027
|
||||||||||||
|
3,857
|
|
2,572
|
|
$
|
27.16
|
|
4/2/2028
|
||||||||||||
|
15,430
|
|
10,287
|
|
$
|
13.58
|
|
4/2/2028
|
||||||||||||
|
37,500
|
|
$
|
418,500
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
181,324
|
|
77,599
|
|
37,500
|
|
$
|
418,500
|
|
||||||||||
(1) These non-qualified stock options were granted pursuant to our Stock Option Plan of Sunnova Energy Corporation ("Plan") with a term of 10 years, subject to earlier termination in certain events related to termination of employment. Each option entitles the option holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the
43
date of grant. These options were originally granted under the Plan and are scheduled to become exercisable in 20% annual increments over the first five anniversaries of the date of grant. In connection with the closing of the IPO, the Company assumed the Plan and the existing options became Options to purchase Common Stock. Upon the closing of the IPO, 50% of the unvested options became exercisable and the remaining 50% of the unvested options will become exercisable one year from the closing of the IPO.
(2) These restricted stock unit awards were made pursuant to our 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2019 Plan") and vest one-third per year over three years except for Mr. Berger whose award vests one-seventh per year over seven years. All awards are subject to acceleration of vesting upon the occurrence of certain events related to termination of employment or change of control of the Company.
(3) With respect to restricted stock units, the amounts set forth in this column include the number of shares subject to such awards multiplied by $11.16, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2019.
Equity Compensation Plans
The table below provides information relating to our equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2019
, all of which have been approved by our stockholders:
|
Number of shares of
common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (1) |
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (2) |
Number of shares of common
stock available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options) (3) |
||
|
5,730,448
|
$15.86
|
3,803,179
|
||
|
(1)
|
This column reflects all shares of common stock subject to outstanding options and RSUs granted under the following plans as of December 31, 2019: the 2013 Stock Option Plan of Sunnova Energy Corporation, the Stock Option Plan of Sunnova Energy Corporation and the 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”).
|
|
(2)
|
The weighted average exercise price relates solely to outstanding stock options since shares subject to the RSUs have no exercise price.
|
|
(3)
|
The number of shares for issuance under the LTIP will be increased on the first day of each fiscal year beginning with the 2020 fiscal year, in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the Company’s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or (ii) such number of shares determined by our Board.
|
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
A form of Executive Change of Control Severance Agreement (the “Executive Severance Agreement”) was adopted by our Board and entered into by each current executive officer of the Company in July 2019 in replacement of any employment, executive or other change of control agreement in effect at such time.
Under the terms of the Executive Severance Agreements, upon a termination of employment by us without “cause” prior to a “change in control” (as those terms are defined in the applicable Executive Severance Agreement), our executive officers, including the NEOs will be eligible to receive (i) 50% of the NEO’s then-current annual base salary, payable in installments over the six-month period beginning with the date of termination, (ii) a prorated target annual bonus (as defined below), payable in installments over the six-month period beginning with the date of termination and (iii) reimbursement of the excess
44
cost of COBRA continuation medical coverage over the cost of medical coverage for our active employees for six months. These severance payments are contingent upon the NEO’s execution of a waiver and release of claims and compliance with non-competition and non-solicitation obligations for a six-month period beginning on the date of termination of the NEO. Upon a termination of employment by us without cause or by the NEO for good reason within 24 months following a change in control (as defined in the Executive Severance Agreement), our NEOs will be entitled to (i) 2.0 times the NEO’s then current annual base salary plus 1.0 times (or 1.5 times, in the case of Mr. Berger) the NEO’s target annual bonus (as defined below), payable in lump sum 60 days after the date of termination, (ii) a prorated target annual bonus, payable in lump sum 60 days after the date of termination and (iii) continued coverage at no cost under the group health plans in which the NEO and dependents participated in immediately prior to the date of termination for the 18 month period following termination. The target annual bonus is the greater of (1) the NEO’s target annual cash bonus opportunity, determined by our board of directors for the year in which the NEO’s termination occurs or, if no target annual bonus has been established for the year in which the NEO’s termination occurs, the target annual bonus for the preceding year or (2) the NEO’s target annual cash bonus for the year in which the change in control of the Company occurs.
Potential Payments Table
The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that would become payable under existing plans and arrangements if the executive’s employment had terminated on December 31, 2019, given the executive’s compensation as of such date and, if applicable, based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2019. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be different than the estimates presented in the table. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing of any such event and our stock price.
45
|
Executive
|
Benefit
|
Change of
Control without Termination |
Change of
Control with Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason |
Termination
by Executive |
Retirement
|
Death or
Disability(1) |
Termination
Without Cause or prior to Change of Control |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
William J. Berger
|
Salary
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bonus
|
—
|
|
1,687,500
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
675,000
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Benefit Continuation
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
7,461
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Stock Awards (2)
|
9,299,996
|
|
9,299,996
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,299,996
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Option Awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
9,299,996
|
|
$
|
11,917,146
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
9,329,646
|
|
$
|
907,461
|
|
||||||||
|
Robert L. Lane
|
Salary
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bonus
|
—
|
|
525,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
262,500
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Benefit Continuation
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,461
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Awards (2)
|
697,500
|
|
697,500
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
697,500
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Option Awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
697,500
|
|
$
|
1,952,150
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
697,500
|
|
$
|
444,961
|
|
||||||||
|
Kris Hillstrand
|
Salary
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
162,500
|
|
|||||||
|
Bonus
|
—
|
|
487,500
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
243,750
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Benefit Continuation
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
7,461
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Stock Awards (2)
|
604,493
|
|
604,493
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
604,493
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Option Awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
604,493
|
|
$
|
1,771,643
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
634,143
|
|
$
|
413,711
|
|
||||||||
|
Walter A. Baker
|
Salary
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
640,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
160,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bonus
|
—
|
|
480,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
240,000
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Benefit Continuation
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
7,461
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Stock Awards (2)
|
604,493
|
|
604,493
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
604,493
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Option Awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
604,493
|
|
$
|
1,754,143
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
634,143
|
|
$
|
407,461
|
|
||||||||
|
John Santo Salvo
|
Salary
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|||||||
|
Bonus
|
—
|
|
450,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
225,000
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Benefit Continuation
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29,650
|
|
7,461
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Stock Awards (2)
|
418,500
|
|
418,500
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
418,500
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Option Awards
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
418,500
|
|
$
|
1,498,150
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
448,150
|
|
$
|
382,461
|
|
||||||||
|
(1)
|
Benefit continuation for death or disability only occurs following a change in control.
|
|
(2)
|
Amount determined by the product of $11.16, the closing price of our stock as of
December 31, 2019
, and the number of shares that have not vested.
|
Compensation and Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During
2019
, Messrs. D’Argenio (Chair), Longstreth and Morgan served on our Compensation Committee. No member of our Compensation Committee is or was an officer or employee of the Company. During
2019
, no executive officer of the Company served as (i) a member of the compensation
46
committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee, (ii) a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee, or (iii) a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as our director.
47
PROPOSAL NO. 3
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
General
The Audit Committee of our Board has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2020. Although it is not required to do so, our Board wishes to submit the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for ratification by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting as a matter of good corporate governance. Even if this selection is ratified by stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee may in its discretion change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our stockholders. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection.
During the fiscal
years ended
December 31, 2019
and
2018
, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was our independent registered public accounting firm and it provided services in the following categories and amounts:
|
Year Ended
December 31, |
|||||||
|
2019
|
2018
|
||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
|
Audit fees(1)
|
$
|
1,270,425
|
|
$
|
1,022,380
|
|
|
|
Audit-related fees(2)
|
1,260,100
|
|
220,000
|
|
|||
|
Tax fees (3)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
All other fees (4)
|
900
|
|
900
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
2,531,425
|
|
$
|
1,243,280
|
|
|
|
1)
|
Audit fees include financial statement audits and reviews under statutory or regulatory requirements and services that generally only the auditor reasonably can provide, including consents for debt and equity issuances and other attest services required by statute or regulation.
|
|
2)
|
Audit related fees consist of assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the auditor such as comfort letter work in connection with registration statements, including the initial public offering, accounting assistance and due diligence in connection with proposed acquisitions or sales, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and audits of stand-alone financial statements or other assurance services not required by statute or regulation.
|
|
3)
|
No tax services were provided in either of the reported periods.
|
|
4)
|
All other fees primarily reflect accounting research software license costs.
|
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our Audit Committee has established a policy governing our use of the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. Under this policy, our Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all audit and non‑audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure the provision of such services does not impair the public accountants' independence. All fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for our fiscal
years ended
December 31, 2019
and
2018
were pre-approved by our Audit Committee.
Vote Required
Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy who are entitled to vote, and who voted for or against the proposal, at a meeting
48
at which a quorum is present. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect the outcome of the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors.
Recommendation of our Board
Our Board recommends a vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors.
49
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Management is primarily responsible for the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an independent integrated audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and for issuing a report on those statements and the Company’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As the Audit Committee, we:
|
•
|
set the “tone at the top” and promote the importance of a culture that supports the integrity of the financial reporting process within the Company;
|
|
•
|
oversee the processes for monitoring auditor independence;
|
|
•
|
oversee the financial reporting process and internal control system on behalf of the Board of Directors;
|
|
•
|
oversee the implementation of new accounting standards;
|
|
•
|
oversee and participate in the resolution of internal control issues, where identified;
|
|
•
|
communicate with the outside auditor on matters related to the conduct of the audit and on critical audit matters expected to be described in the auditor’s report; and
|
|
•
|
review and understand non-GAAP financial measures, and related company policies and disclosure controls.
|
The Audit Committee met in person once, with an additional two conference call meetings, during 2019 for a total of three meetings. At various times during the 2019 fiscal year, the Audit Committee met with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the internal auditors, with and without management present.
In the course of fulfilling our oversight responsibilities, we reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
This review included a discussion of, among others:
|
•
|
all critical accounting policies followed by the Company;
|
|
•
|
the reasonableness of significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, including the quality of the Company’s accounting principles;
|
|
•
|
the integrity and effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls;
|
|
•
|
the clarity and completeness of financial disclosures;
|
|
•
|
the adequacy of internal controls that could significantly affect the Company’s financial statements;
|
|
•
|
items that could be accounted for using alternative treatments within GAAP;
|
|
•
|
any significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting raised by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during its audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting; and
|
|
•
|
the potential effects of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as any off balance sheet structures, on the Company’s financial statements.
|
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s 2019 Form 10-K.
50
We have discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by AS 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and approved by the SEC.
We have received and reviewed audit and non-audit fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 2019, including those pre-approved pursuant to the Company’s policy and in compliance with PCAOB Rule 3524. We reviewed and approved the Company’s policies regarding the provision of non-audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the Company and the hiring of employees of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP by the Company.
We reviewed the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from the Company and its management. This review included receipt and review of independence communications from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by the PCAOB’s Rule 3526.
As the Audit Committee, we approved the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In connection with that approval, we
|
•
|
reviewed the scope of an overall plan for the annual audit for 2020;
|
|
•
|
approved an estimate of audit related fees to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; and
|
|
•
|
considered PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s description of their quality control procedures.
|
Additionally, we
|
•
|
reviewed the scope of the internal audit plan for 2020;
|
|
•
|
reviewed the adequacy of certain financial policies;
|
|
•
|
reviewed and discussed the results of meetings of the Company’s Disclosure Committee;
|
|
•
|
on a quarterly basis, reviewed the Company’s financial results prior to their public issuance;
|
|
•
|
reviewed the Company’s compliance with certain legal and regulatory requirements;
|
|
•
|
reviewed the performance of the internal audit function;
|
|
•
|
reviewed significant legal developments as described by management of the Company; and
|
|
•
|
reviewed all complaints in accordance with the Company’s Whistleblower Policy.
|
Audit Committee:
Mark Longstreth
Michael Morgan
C. Park Shaper - Chair
April 9, 2020
51
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Delinquent Section 16 (a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports or forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms we have received, and written representations from certain reporting persons that no reports on Form 5 were required for those persons, we believe that, during the period from July 25, 2019 through
December 31, 2019
, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and stockholders owning greater than 10% of our outstanding common stock were complied with.
Annual Report to Stockholders
Our 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes a copy of the 2019 Form 10-K containing our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, has been furnished to all stockholders, primarily via the Internet and alternatively by mail if requested. The Annual Report is not part of the proxy solicitation material.
Stockholder Proposals
Stockholder Proposals in the Proxy Statement
. Proposals from our stockholders intended to be included in our proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received at our principal executive offices (directed to our Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement) no later than February 19, 2021 and must comply with the requirements of the proxy rules promulgated by the SEC in order to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy related to that meeting.
Director Nominations for Inclusion in our 2021 Proxy Materials
. For the 2021 annual meeting, notice of a director nomination must be received at our principal executive offices (directed to our Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement) during the period beginning January 20, 2021, and ending February 19, 2021.
Other Proposals or Nominations to be Brought before our 2021 Annual Meeting.
Proposals of business and/or nominations of Director candidates from our stockholders that are not intended to be included in our proxy materials for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received at our principal executive officer (directed to our Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement) during the period beginning January 20, 2021, and ending February 19, 2021.
Other Matters
Management does not intend to bring any other matters before the meeting and has not been informed that any matters are to be presented by others. In the event any other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the proxies under discretionary authority therein in accordance with their judgment on such matters.
Your vote is very important.
It is important that your shares be represented. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the meeting in person, please take a moment now to vote your proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or by completing and signing the form of proxy and promptly returning it in the envelope provided.
We will provide, without charge, upon written request of any stockholder, a copy of our 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders, including consolidated financial statements
52
and financial statement schedules. Please direct such request to the Secretary, Sunnova Energy International Inc., 20 East Greenway Plaza, Suite 475, Houston, Texas 77046, 281-417-0960.
/s/ Walter A. Baker
Walter A. Baker
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
Houston, Texas
April 9, 2020
53
APPENDIX A
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
The following is a reconciliation of our revenue to Realized Gross Contracted Customer Value for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019
.
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2019 |
||||
|
(in millions)
|
||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
131.6
|
|
|
|
Principal proceeds from customer notes receivable, net of related revenue
|
20.0
|
|
||
|
Interest income from customer notes receivable
|
11.6
|
|
||
|
Straight-line revenue adjustment on lease revenue
|
(8.2
|
)
|
||
|
Lease performance guaranty obligation adjustment
|
(2.5
|
)
|
||
|
Loan performance guaranty obligation adjustment
|
(0.6
|
)
|
||
|
EZ PPA adjustment
|
3.3
|
|
||
|
Distributions to tax equity investors
|
(7.6
|
)
|
||
|
Operating, maintenance and administrative expenses associated with our solar service agreements
|
(9.4
|
)
|
||
|
Impairments
|
1.8
|
|
||
|
Realized Gross Contracted Customer Value
|
$
|
140.0
|
|
|
54
PROXY
SUNNOVA ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
MAY 20, 2020, 9:00 A.M.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Robert L. Lane and Walter A. Baker, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint a substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated below, all the shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Sunnova Energy International Inc., held of record by the undersigned as of the close of business on March 23, 2020, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 20, 2020 or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
VOTING
Internet
- go to www.proxypush.com/NOVA; cast your vote online; view Meeting Documents; or
Telephone
- 866-390-5419; use any touch-tone telephone; have your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form ready; follow the simple recorded instructions; or
Mail
-
mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form, detach your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form; return your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in the postage-paid envelope provided.
|
1.
|
To elect the following Class I director nominees:
|
WILLIAM J. BERGER
|
☐
FOR
|
☐
WITHHOLD
|
|
RAHMAN D’ARGENIO
|
☐
FOR
|
☐
WITHHOLD
|
|
MICHAEL MORGAN
|
☐
FOR
|
☐
WITHHOLD
|
|
|
2.
|
To establish, by a stockholder non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of submission to stockholders of advisory vote regarding executive compensation.
|
|
☐
ONE YEAR
|
☐
TWO YEARS
|
☐
THREE YEARS
|
||
|
3.
|
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2020:
|
|
☐
FOR
|
☐
AGAINST
|
☐
ABSTAIN
|
||
|
4.
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
|
The Board of Directors of the Company recommends a vote FOR all nominees for director, 1 YEAR for proposal 2 and FOR proposal 3.
(see reverse side)
55
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all nominees for director, 1 YEAR for proposal 2 and FOR proposal 3. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card.
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2020.
A COPY OF THE PROXY STATEMENT, THIS FORM OF PROXY, AND THE SUNNOVA ENERGY INTERNATIONAL INC. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.PROXYDOCS.COM/NOVA.
|
If no direction is made, the Proxy will be voted in accordance with our Board of Directors’ recommendations.
Please sign exactly as name appears hereon.
SIGNATURE (Please sign within box) DATE
SIGNATURE (Joint Owners) DATE
NOTE: When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
56
TABLE OF CONTENTS