NUTX 10-K Annual Report Dec. 31, 2014 | Alphaminr

NUTX 10-K Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014

NUTEX HEALTH, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-K 1 igambitform10k4102015draft.htm IGAMBIT 10-K DEC 2014 Converted by EDGARwiz

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

þ

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-53862

IGAMBIT INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

11-3363609

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

1050 W. Jericho Turnpike, Suite A

Smithtown, New York 11787

(Address of principal executive offices)

(631) 670-6777

(Registrant’s telephone number)

(Registrant’s former telephone number)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of Each Class: NONE

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the

Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section

15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period

that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for

the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate

website, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of

Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of the chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period

that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o




Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not

contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or

information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this

Form 10-K. o

Indicate  by check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  large  accelerated  filer,  an accelerated  filer, a  non-

accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”

“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated

Accelerated

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller

filer o

filer o

reporting

company þ

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the act):

Yes o No þ

There is not currently a market for the Registrant’s common stock.

As of April 15, 2015 there were 26,583,990 shares of the Registrant’s $0.001 par value common stock

outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None




iGambit Inc.

FORM 10-K — FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

PART I

Item 1

Business

1

Item 1A

Risk Factors

9

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

9

Item 2

Properties

9

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

9

Item 4

(Removed and Reserved)

10

PART II

Item 5

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters

and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

11

Item 6

Selected Financial Data

12

Item 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

13

Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

19

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

19

Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and

Financial Disclosure

20

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures

20

Item 9B

Other Information

21

PART III

Item 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

21

Item 11

Executive Compensation

26

Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

and Related Stockholder Matters

28

Item 13

Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director

Independence

29

Item 14

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

29

PART IV

Item 15

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

30

EX-31.1

EX-31.2

EX-32.1

EX-32.2

i




This annual report on Form 10-K is for the year ended December 31, 2014. The

Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) allows us to “incorporate by reference”

information  that  we  file  with  the  SEC, which  means  that  we  can  disclose  important

information   to   you by   referring   you directly   to   those   documents.   Information

incorporated  by reference  is  considered to  be  part  of  this annual  report. In  addition,

information that we file with the SEC  in the future will automatically  update and

supersede information contained in this annual report. In this annual report, “Company,”

“we,” “us” and “our” refer to iGambit Inc. and its subsidiaries.

ii




PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the

meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company has based these forward-

looking statements on the Company’s current expectations and projections about future

events. These forward-looking statements are subject to  known and unknown  risks,

uncertainties and assumptions about us and the Company’s subsidiaries that may cause

the  Company’s  actual  results,  levels  of  activity,  performance  or  achievements  to  be

materially   different   from   any   future   results,   levels   of   activity,   performance   or

achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In many cases,

you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “anticipate,”

“estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,”

“predict,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,”

“guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and other similar words. However, the

absence  of  these  words  does  not  mean  that  the  statements  are  not  forward-looking.

Factors  that  might  cause  or contribute  to  a  material  difference  include,  but  are  not

limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, including the section entitled

“Risk Factors” and the risks discussed in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange

Commission filings. The  following discussion should be  read in conjunction with the

Company’s   audited   Consolidated   Financial   Statements   and   related   Notes   thereto

included elsewhere in this report.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

HISTORY

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware under the name BigVault.com Inc.

on April 13, 2000. On April 18, 2000, we merged with BigVault.com, Inc., a New York

corporation with which we were affiliated. We survived the merger, and on December 19,

2000 changed our name to bigVAULT Storage Technologies, Inc. At that time we were

in the business of providing remote, internet-based storage vaulting services and related

ancillary services to end users and resellers (the “Vault Business”).

On February 28, 2006 we sold all of our assets to Digi-Data Corporation

(“DDC”), an unrelated third party, pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement

dated December 21, 2005 (the “APA”), a copy of which is filed herewith as an exhibit.

As consideration for our transfer of assets under the  APA, DDC paid certain of our

liabilities and agreed to make certain quarterly and annual revenue sharing payments to

us, as is further described below. Mr. Salerno and Ms. Luqman accepted employment

with DDC in senior management positions post closing, and continued to work for DDC

until February 2009. As of March 1, 2009 Mr. Salerno and Ms. Luqman returned to their

full time management roles with the Company.

On April 5, 2006, we changed our name to iGambit Inc.

1




On October 1, 2009, we acquired the assets of Jekyll Island Ventures, Inc., a New

York  corporation  doing  business  as  Gotham  Photo  Company  (“Jekyll”)  through  our

wholly owned subsidiary Gotham Innovation Lab, Inc., a New York corporation

(“Gotham”).

On December 28, 2012, we entered into an Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement

(the “Purchase Agreement”) to acquire substantially all of the assets of IGX Global Inc. a

Connecticut corporation (“IGXUS”), and all of the issued and outstanding shares of IGX

Global  UK  Limited  a  UK Private  Limited  company (“IGXUK”)  through  our  wholly

owned subsidiary IGXGLOBAL CORP., a Delaware corporation (“IGXGLOBAL”), and

thereby acquired the business operated by IGSUS and IGSUK (the “Acquired Business”).

Thomas Duffy is the sole shareholder of both IGXUK and IGXUS (the “Shareholder”).

The Purchase Agreement was disclosed on the Company’s current report on Form 8-K

filed on January 7, 2013.

On April 8, 2013, iGambit Inc. (“iGambit”) and its’ wholly owned subsidiary,

IGXGLOBAL,  CORP.    (“IGXGLOBAL”,  and  collectively,  the  "Company"),  entered

into,  and  became  obligated  under,  a  transaction  to  rescind  the  Company’s  Purchase

Agreement dated December 28, 2012   with   IGX Global Inc. (“IGXUS”), IGX Global

UK Limited (“IGXUK”, and collectively, “IGXNJ”) and Tomas Duffy (“Duffy”) the sole

shareholder of both IGXUK and IGXUS (the “Shareholder”).  The Rescission Agreement

was disclosed on the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2013.

Under the terms of the Rescission Agreement, the Company, IGXNJ and

Shareholder (collectively  “IGX”), agreed to unwind the Purchase Agreement in its

entirety  and  to  fully  restore  each  to  the  positions  they  were  respectively in  prior  to

entering  the  Purchase  Agreement,  in every respect  other  than  as  otherwise  expressly

contemplated by the Rescission Agreement; and key terms as follows:

(i)  IGX to payback or arrange acceptable payoff of the Keltic Financing;

(ii) Cancellation of any future consideration to IGX;

(iii) IGX to pay to iGambit $625,000 in consideration for its expenses and

inconvenience; and

(v) IGX to assume and pay  certain  expenses related  to the contemplated

Purchase Agreement.

On  April  25,  2013  the  conditions  to  closing  the  Rescission  Agreement  were

completed.

OUR COMPANY

Introduction

We are a company focused on the technology markets. Presently we have one

operating subsidiary, Gotham Innovation Lab Inc. (“Gotham”). Gotham is in the business

of providing media technology services to the real estate industry. Revenues consist

entirely of revenues from the operation of our Gotham subsidiary ($1,068,617 during

2




year ended December 31, 2014).   In addition to Gotham’s operations, we earned other

income, net of other expenses, of $78,493 and income from discontinued operations of

$17,531.

Our primary focus is the acquisition of additional technology companies. We

believe that the background of our management and of our Board of Directors in the

technology markets is a valuable resource that makes us a desirable business partner to

the companies that we are seeking to acquire. When we acquire a company, we work to

assume an active role in the development and growth of the company, providing both

strategic guidance and operational support. We provide strategic guidance to our partner

companies relating  to, among  other things, market positioning, business model and

product development, strategic capital expenditures, mergers and acquisitions and exit

opportunities. Additionally, we provide operational support to help our partner companies

manage day-to-day business and operational issues and implement best practices in the

areas of finance, sales and marketing, business development, human resources and legal

services. Once a company joins our partner company network, our collective expertise is

leveraged   to   help   position   that   company to   produce   high-margin,   recurring   and

predictable earnings and generate long-term value for our stockholders.

Our  current  intention  is  to  fund  the  purchase  price  of  acquisitions  through  a

combination of the issuance of our common stock at closing and the issuance of common

stock purchase or common-stock warrants that would become exercisable only in the

event certain earn-out conditions are satisfied by the acquired company. In addition to

acquiring  entire  companies,  we  would  also  consider  entering  into  joint  ventures  and

acquiring less than 100 percent of a target company.

Our Strategy to Grow the Company

General

We have an overall corporate business plan as a holding company to seek out and

acquire operating companies. Phase one of our strategy is complete. We established new

corporate headquarters and a website, expanded our board to include 3 outside

independent directors, set up periodic board meetings, engaged a sophisticated full

service law firm, engaged a new PCAOB registered auditing firm, engaged an investment

banking firm as advisors to assist in the analysis of target acquisitions, and become an

SEC  reporting  company.    In  addition, we  are  working on  a  daily basis  towards  our

strategy, identifying further acquisitions that will expand and or complement our existing

subsidiary.

Sources of Target Businesses

We anticipate that target business candidates will be brought to our attention from

various sources, including our management  team, investment  bankers, venture capital

funds,   private   equity funds,   leveraged   buyout   funds,   management   buyout   funds,

consulting firms and other members of the financial community who will become aware

that we are seeking business partners via public relations and marketing efforts, direct

3




contact by management or other similar efforts, who may present solicited or unsolicited

proposals. Any finder or broker  would only be  paid a  fee  upon the  completion of a

business combination. While  we  do not presently anticipate  engaging the  services of

professional firms that specialize in acquisitions on any formal basis, we may decide to

engage such firms in the future or we may be approached on an unsolicited basis. Our

officers and directors, as well as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention target

business candidates that they become aware of through their business contacts. While our

officers and directors make no commitment as to the amount of time they will spend

trying to identify or investigate potential target businesses, they believe that the various

relationships they have developed over their careers together with their direct inquiry,

will   generate   a   number   of   potential   target   businesses   that   will   warrant   further

investigation.  In no event  will  we  pay any of our existing officers, directors, special

advisors or stockholders or any entity with which they are affiliated any finder’s fee or

other compensation for services rendered to us prior to or in connection with the

completion of a business combination. In addition, none of our officers, directors, special

advisors or existing stockholders will receive any finder’s fee, consulting fees or any

similar  fees  from  any person  or  entity  in  connection  with  any business  combination

involving us other than any compensation or fees that may be received for any services

provided following such business combination.

Selecting Acquisition Targets

Our management has virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying prospective

target business and diligently reviews all of the proposals we receive.

The criteria we look for in a potential acquisition include, but are not limited to,

the following:

Company Characteristics

§ Established Company with proven track record

o Company with history of strong operating and financial performance, or

o Company undergoing a turnaround that demonstrates strong prospects for

future growth

§ Strong Cash Flow Characteristics.

o Cash flow neutral or positive,

o Predictable recurring revenue stream,

o High gross margins and

o Low working capital and capital expenditure needs

§ Strong Competitive Industry Position

o Leading or niche market position, and/or

o Strong channel relationships that promote barriers to entry

§ Strong Management Team

o Experienced,  proven  track  record  in  delivering    revenue  and  ability to

execute, or

4




o A management team that can be complemented with our contacts and

team

§ Diversified Customer and Supplier base

§ Proprietary products or marketing position

Industry Characteristics

§ Non-cyclical

§ Services Consumer or niche market

§ Fragmented with potential for consolidation or growth

§ Emerging markets

Industries of Interest

§ Real Estate Services

§ Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP)

§ IT Solutions Providers specializing in security and network technology

products, services, and support

§ Internet

o Cloud Computing

o Security focused applications

Investment Criteria

§ Sales Volumes: $500 thousand to $30 million

§ Cash Flow: Neutral or positive

§ Structure: Controlled ownership. Closely held private company

§ Geography: North America  Investment size: $1 million to $5 Million

§ Involvement: Board oversight

§ Controlling Interest: Acquire 100% of controlling interest in target

§ Marketing:

o Target captures a particular segment of the market

o Target has a focused strategic marketing plan.

These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the

merits of a particular business combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the

above factors as well as other considerations deemed relevant by our management in

effecting a business combination consistent with our business objective.

Diligence Process

Upon receipt of a business plan, the procedure is for management to review the

business plan and determine if it satisfies the Company’s acquisition criteria, and whether

the business plan should be rejected or pursued further. If the plan satisfies the

requirements, then Management meets with the target’s management to determine if there

5




is a synergy that can work and to explore the business plan in greater detail. Generally

this occurs over several meetings and can take some time. Depending on the nature of the

business, management may enlist certain technical or industry consultants to meet with

the target and provide feedback and analysis. Management will also review the target’s

financials.  If the analysis suggests the target should be explored further Management will

present the opportunity to the BOD for approval to pursue the opportunity further. One or

two outside directors may meet with the target to make an independent assessment. If the

opportunity is approved for further exploration management will discuss potential

purchase structure with target’s management to be sure that a meeting of the minds exists

for a potential deal.    At this point management will request that our investment banking

advisors give their opinion of the industry, the market and potential financing options of

the deal. Often, the  investment bankers will meet with target’s management. The

investment banker’s feedback is presented to the board  and, if positive, the  Board

analyzes the proposed financing  structure, discusses effects of a  transaction on the

Company as they relate to taxes, capitalization, stock value etc., engaging the necessary

outside consultants. If all appears positive a letter of intent is negotiated and executed,

additional diligence is conducted, and definitive transaction documents are negotiated

and executed.

Evaluation of the Target’s Management

We would condition any acquisition on the commitment of management of the

target business to remain in place post-closing. Following a business combination, we

may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the

target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional

managers, or that any such additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge

or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management. Although we intend to

closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when evaluating the

desirability of effecting a business combination, we cannot assure   you that our

assessment of the target business’s management will prove to be correct.

Competition

In  identifying,  evaluating  and  selecting  a  target  business,  we  may  encounter

intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours. Many

of  these  entities  are  well  established  and  have  extensive  experience  identifying  and

effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Many of these competitors

possess greater technical, human and other resources than us and our financial resources

will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors, which

may limit our ability to compete in acquiring certain target businesses. This inherent

competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target

business.

6




Companies Currently Under Review

We are constantly in the process of reviewing potential target companies.

Currently, we are not under contract to acquire any companies.

Our Partner Company

Gotham Innovation Lab Inc.

Products and Services

Gotham’s business is directed at providing media technology services to the real

estate  community.  The  range  of  media  services  includes  Real  Estate  Sales  location

Photography,

the   exclusive   Gotham   EXPO   Full   Screen   Experience;   Floorplan

Measurements,  and Redraws and  E-Brochures, Virtual Staging, Headshots, and HD

Video.

In 2012, Gotham launched its new offering ScreenPLAY. Gotham's ScreenPLAY

is a low cost tool that gets real estate agents listings on YouTube, Wellcomemat, and

other popular video platforms with enhanced visibility on Google quickly.   Gotham has

also seen success in its Headshot events for real estate agents, Headshot events offer

professional headshots photo sessions on an individual or company wide basis. Gotham

also provides website development services, sales office technology and data interchange

services for many of the real estate firms in New York City.

When it comes to selling real estate every broker or seller listing has to have

pictures. Utilizing the latest technology Gotham’s service offerings provide a full listing

experience for real estate agents’ clients. Gotham service offerings allow brokers and

sellers to present their listings in the best possible light while giving the viewer control of

the show. Gotham’s services integrate images, photos, floor plans, video, virtual staging,

agent and key listing details in an engaging format that immerses the viewer.

All  systems  are  built  on  accessible  web  platforms  that  integrate  quickly  and

seamlessly into the agent’s workflow.

In  addition  to  natural  expansion  into  the  areas  surrounding  NYC,  Gotham  is

actively working to expand other geographic locations on the East Coast. Gotham has

already established a presence in Florida, covering the Miami to West Palm Beach area.

Competitive Comparison

Gotham  competes with others in the industry by focusing on user interaction,

technology and delivery. Gotham maintains strict standards of photography and a roster

of accomplished photographers who we engage in between their premium assignments

such as fashion shoots, architectural projects, etc.

7




In   addition   to   superior   media,   in   the   opinion   of   management,   Gotham’s

technology  tools  set  us  apart  from  our  competition.  For  example,  our  expo  product

offering utilizes the pre-generation of a multitude of media sets to deliver images sized

perfectly for the users screen, wasting no bandwidth or file size, thereby enabling us to

maintain the speed and efficiency of the product at an optimal level. In the opinion of

management, a majority of our competitors either don’t seem to employ similar measures

in their full screen product offerings or do so, on a more limited basis.

Future Products and Services

Future offerings will include enhanced  products that focus on social  media

interaction, mobile applications and tools for realtors, as well as multi touch augmented

reality technologies for presentations, etc.  Gotham  will  continue  to expand its media

offerings, integrating with and adopting technologies as they become available.

Customers

Gotham currently  has  approximately  400 client accounts, including  accounts

ranging from single agent accounts to large “master accounts” with large firms such as

Douglas Elliman and Halstead. Taking these and other master accounts into

consideration, Gotham does business with over 3,000 New York City real estate agents.

The following five customers constituted approximately 75% of the Company’s sales in

2014:  Douglas Elliman Real Estate, LLC approximately 70% of sales; Richard Caplan

Photography approximately 2% of sales; EGR International, Inc. approximately 1%

of sales; Brooklyn Ridge Realty approximately 1% of sales; and Halstead Property

Development Marketing LLC approximately  1% of sales. The loss of Douglas

Elliman Real Estate could have a material adverse affect on the Company’s financial

condition.

Expansion Summary

Gotham’s objective is to be a market leader in offering EXPO, Virtual Tours, and

Video, type services to the real estate industry. Gotham is currently providing services to

a number of realtors and brokers in the New York Metropolitan area including, but not

limited  to,  Douglas  Elliman  (“DE”),  Corcoran,  Trump  among  others.   In  addition  to

natural expansion into the areas surrounding NYC such as Long Island, Gotham has

recently expanded into Florida, and is actively working to expand by further providing

services to large accounts that exist in both Manhattan and targeted secondary markets,

and through the selective hiring of one-off service providers who are currently operating

in other markets

Employees

We presently have 9 total employees all of which are full-time.

8




OUR CORPORATE INFORMATION

Our principal offices are located at 1050 W. Jericho Turnpike, Suite A,

Smithtown, New York, 11787. Our telephone  number is (631) 670-6777 and our fax

number  is  (631) 670-6780.  We  currently  operate  two  corporate  websites  that  can  be

found at www.igambit.com, and www.gothamphotocompany.com (the information on

the foregoing websites does not form a part of this report).

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not Required.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our corporate executive office is located in Smithtown, New York, where we

lease approximately  1000 square feet  of office space. Monthly  lease payments are

approximately $1,590. The lease is for a term of five (5) years commencing on March 1,

2012 and ending on February 28, 2017. The lease contains annual escalations of 2% of

the annual rent.

Our Gotham operations are located in New York, New York, where we license

office suites with furniture and equipment in a shared global office building. Monthly

license payments are approximately $4,025 and the fees are paid on a month to month

basis.

Our leased and licensed properties are suitable for their respective uses and are, in

general, adequate for our present needs. Our properties are subject to various federal,

state, and local statutes and ordinances regulating their operations. Management does not

believe  that  compliance  with  such  statutes  and  ordinances  will  materially affect  our

business, financial condition, or results of operations.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Digi-Data Corporation

On October 1, 2012, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the

District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, asserting claims against DigiData Corp.

("Defendant") for  monetary damages arising from  the  Defendant's  breach of contract

regarding that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 26, 2006 among the

parties, and to enforce payment of outstanding contingency payments due to the

Company pursuant to said agreement.

9




On December 13, 2013 the  Court Granted Summary Judgment in iGambit’s favor

against Digi-Data in the amount of $570,590, plus interest at the Maryland legal rate of

6% per annum from August 31, 2012, and post judgment interest at the Federal statutory

Rate.   Furthermore, Digi-Data’s Counterclaim was dismissed.

On February 24, 2014 we entered into a Forbearance Agreement with Digi-Data

pursuant to which Digi-Data shall pay to iGambit Six Hundred Forty-Six Thousand, Six

Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars and Sixty-Seven Cents ($646,668.67) (the “Settlement

Amount”) in full satisfaction of the Judgment based upon certain terms, which included

the following:

Digi-Data  Sale:    In  the  event  of  a  Digi-Data  Sale,  iGambit  shall  be  paid  the

Remaining Balance at closing of any such Digi-Data Sale as provided in

paragraph 2, below. iGambit acknowledges that, if the Digi-Data Sale is a sale or

sales  of  the  Digi-Data  Assets,  there  may  be  insufficient  proceeds  to  pay  the

Remaining Balance in full. If the Digi-Data Sale is a sale or sales of the stock of

Digi-Data and there are insufficient proceeds at closing to pay the Remaining

Balance in full, iGambit shall continue to receive the Subsequent Monthly

Payment until the full Remaining Balance is paid.

On May 12, 2014, Digi-Data paid the full balance due on the judgment plus all accrued

interest upon the sale of Digi-Data.

Financial Advisor Contract

Brooks, Houghton & Company, Inc. (BHC)

We entered into a contract with BHC in which BHC would provide financial advisory

services in connection with the Company’s proposed business combinations and related

fund raising transactions. As part of that agreement BHC would be entitled to a “Business

Combination Fee” equal to three percent of the amount of the company’s total proceeds

and other consideration paid or to be paid for the assets acquired, inclusive of equity or

any debt issued; however the fee was to be no less than $300,000. As a result of the IGX

transaction, BHC initially felt entitled to $300,000. We have taken a position that since

the transaction has been rescinded, that the fee is has not been earned and thus not to be

paid. While the ultimate outcome of this matter is not presently determinable, it is the

opinion  of management  that  the  resolution of any outstanding claim  will  not  have  a

material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 4. ( REMOVED AND RESERVED)

10




PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED

STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY

SECURITIES

MARKET INFORMATION

Effective March 19, 2011 the Company’s common stock is quoted on the Over

the Counter Bulletin Board, a service maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory

Authority, under the ticker symbol “IGMB”.

HOLDERS

As of April 15, 2015, there are 26,583,990 shares of our common stock

outstanding, held of record by 181 persons.   We have 275,000 common stock warrants

outstanding and 1,518,900 common stock options outstanding.

As of April 15, 2015, approximately all 26,583,990 shares of our common stock are

eligible to be sold under Rule 144.

DIVIDENDS

We have never declared  or paid  any  dividends on our common stock. Any

determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of

Directors  and  will  be  dependent  upon  our  results  of  operations,  financial  condition,

capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by the

Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is not expected to declare dividends or make

any other distributions in the foreseeable future, but instead intends to retain earnings, if

any, for use in business operations.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

We currently do not have an equity compensation plan.    In 2006, the Company

adopted the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2006 Plan").    The Plan expired on

December 31, 2009. The 2006 Plan provided for the granting of options to purchase up

to 10,000,000 shares of common stock.  8,146,900 options have been issued under the

plan  to  date  of  which  7,157,038  have  been  exercised  and  692,962  have  expired  to

date.  There were 296,900 options outstanding under the 2006 Plan on its expiration date

of  December 31, 2009.      All  options issued subsequent  to this date  were  not  issued

pursuant to any plan.

In addition to the 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, we have issued and

outstanding compensatory warrants to two consultants entitling the holders to purchase a

total of 275,000 shares of our common stock at an average exercise price of $0.94 per

share. Warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock vest upon 6 months after the

Company engages in an IPO, have an exercise price of $3.00 per share, and expire 2

years after the Company engages in an IPO. Warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of

common stock vest 100,000 shares on issuance (June 1, 2009), and 50,000 shares on each

of the following three anniversaries of the date of issuance, have exercise prices ranging

11




from $0.50 per share to $1.15 per share, and expire on June 1, 2019. The issuance of the

compensatory warrants was not submitted to our shareholders for their approval.

The following table describes our equity compensation plans as of December 31,

2014:

Number of Securities

Remaining Available

for Future Issuance

Number of

Securities

under Equity

to be Issued Upon     Weighted Average      Compensation Plans

Exercise of

Exercise Price of

(excluding securities

Outstanding

Options,

Outstanding Options,

referenced in

Warrants and

Rights

Warrants and Rights

column (a))

Plan Category

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity

compensation

plans approved by

our stockholders

(1)

296,900  $

0.06

0

Equity

compensation

plans not approved

by our

stockholders

1,222,000  $

0.06

0

(1) Equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders consist of our 2006

Long Term Incentive Plan.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

During 2014 we did not sell securities in transactions not registered under the

Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not Required

12




ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results

of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in

accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of

America. The preparation of financial statements may require us to make estimates and

assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related

disclosures at the date of the financial statements. We do not currently have any estimates

or assumptions where the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the

levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or

the susceptibility of such matters to change or the impact of the estimates and

assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material, except as

described below.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,

accounts  receivable,  accounts  payable,  and  amounts  due  to/from  related  parties,  the

carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Additionally, there

are no assets or liabilities for which fair value is remeasured on a recurring basis.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenues from continuing operations consist of revenues derived primarily

from sales of products and services rendered to real estate brokers. We recognize

revenues when the services or products have been provided or delivered, the fees we

charge are fixed or determinable, we and our customers understand the specific nature

and terms of the agreed upon transactions, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Contingency  payment  income  was  recognized  quarterly from  a  percentage  of

Digi-Data’s vaulting service revenue, and is included in discontinued operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include checking

and money market accounts and any highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a

maturity of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable

We analyze the collectability of accounts receivable from continuing operations

each accounting period and adjust our allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly. A

considerable  amount  of  judgment  is  required  in assessing the  realization  of accounts

receivables,  including  the    creditworthiness  of  each  customer,  current  and  historical

13




collection  history  and  the  related  aging  of  past  due  balances.  We  evaluate  specific

accounts when we become aware of information indicating that a customer may not be

able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial condition, lower

credit ratings, bankruptcy or other factors affecting the ability to render payment.

Allowance for doubtful accounts was $17,865 at December 31, 2014 and 2013,

respectively. Bad debt expense of $4,295 and $0 was charged to operations for the years

ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Property and equipment and depreciation

Property and equipment are stated at cost.     Depreciation for both financial

reporting and income tax purposes is computed using combinations of the straight line

and accelerated methods over the estimated lives of the respective assets.    Computer

equipment is depreciated over 5 years and furniture and fixtures are depreciated over 7

years.   Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. When property

and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated

depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gain or loss is credited or

charged to income.

Depreciation expense of $4,766 and $6,694 was charged to operations for the years ended

December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for our stock-based awards granted under our employee

compensation plan in accordance  with ASC Topic  No. 718-20, Awards Classified as

Equity, which requires the measurement of compensation expense  for all  share-based

compensation granted to employees and non-employee directors at fair value on the date

of grant and recognition of compensation expense over the related service period for

awards expected to vest.  We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate

the fair value of our stock options and warrants. The Black-Scholes option valuation

model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock

price  volatility  of  the  Company’s  common  stock.  Changes  in  these  subjective  input

assumptions can materially  affect the fair value estimate of our stock options and

warrants.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance

with ASC Topic No. 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and

liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases

of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are

expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

We  apply  the  provisions  of ASC  Topic  No.  740  for  the  financial  statement

recognition,  measurement  and  disclosure  of  uncertain  tax  positions  recognized  in  the

14




Company’s financial statements . In accordance with this provision, tax positions must

meet  a  more-likely-than-not  recognition  threshold  and  measurement  attribute  for  the

financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position.

Convertible Note

On September 16, 2013, the Company issued an 8% convertible note in the aggregate

principal amount of $103,500, convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Note, including accrued interest was due June 18, 2014 and was convertible any time

after 180 days at the option of the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at

55% of the average stock price of the lowest 3 closing bid prices during the 10 trading

day  period  ending  on  the  latest  complete  trading  day  prior  to  the  conversion date.

Interest  expense  on  the  convertible  note  of  $3,242  was  recorded  for  the  year  ended

December 31, 2014.

Initially the Company had anticipated repaying the obligation prior to the effective date

of the holder electing to convert. Since the effective date of the election to convert has

passed the Company recorded a debt discount related to identified embedded derivatives

relating to conversion features and a reset provisions (see Note 7) based fair values as of

the inception date of the Note. The calculated debt discount equaled the face of the note

and was amortized over the term of the note. During the year ended December 31, 2014,

the noteholder converted $49,000 of the principal balance to 1,539,934 shares of common

stock,  and  the  Company  repaid  the  remaining  note  balance  of  $54,500  and  accrued

interest of $5,646 on June 18, 2014.

Derivative Liability

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued a convertible note.

The note is convertible into common stock, at the holders’ option, at a discount to the

market price of the Company’s common stock. The Company has identified embedded

derivatives included in these notes as a result of certain anti-dilutive (reset) provisions,

related to certain conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial

instruments requires that the Company record the fair value of the derivatives as of the

inception date of the convertible note and debt discount amortization to fair value as of

each subsequent reporting date. This resulted in a fair value of derivative liability of

$152,076 in which to the extent of the face value of convertible note was treated as debt

discount with the remainder treated as interest expense.

The fair value of the embedded derivatives at  December 31, 2013, in the amount of

$152,076, was determined using the Binomial Option Pricing Model based on the

following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 243.00%, (3)

weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.09%, (4) expected lives of 0.72 to 0.75 years,

and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.51 per share. The

Company recorded interest expense from the excess of the derivative liability over the

convertible  note  of  $48,576  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013.  A  gain  on

15




derivative liability of $152,076 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2014

for the satisfaction of the convertible note.

Based upon ASC 840-15-25 (EITF Issue 00-19, paragraph 11) the Company has adopted

a sequencing  approach regarding  the application of ASC 815-40 to its outstanding

convertible note. Pursuant to the sequencing approach, the Company evaluates its

contracts based upon earliest issuance date.

Stock Transactions

On September 25, 2014, the Board unanimously approved an amendment to the

Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of Common Stock

which  the  Company is authorized to issue  from  seventy five  million  (75,000,000)  to

Three Hundred Million (300,000,000) shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per

share, and to create a new class of stock entitled “preferred stock” (together, the

“Capitalization Amendments”). The Capitalization Amendments create provisions in the

Company’s  Articles  of  Incorporation,  which  allows  the  voting  powers,  designations,

preferences and other special  rights, and qualifications, limitations and restrictions of

each series of preferred stock to be established from time to time by the Board without

approval of the stockholders. No dividend, voting, conversion, liquidation or redemptions

rights as well as redemption or sinking fund provisions are yet established with respect to

the Company’s preferred stock. On October 3, 2014, the Majority Stockholders executed

and   delivered   to   the   Company   a   written   consent   approving   the   Capitalization

Amendments.

Common Stock Issued

In connection with the convertible note payable the note holder converted $49,000 of the

principal balance to 1,539,934 shares of common stock during the year ended December

31, 2014.  The stock issued was determined based on the terms of the convertible note.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Introduction

iGambit is a company focused on the technology markets. Our sole operating

subsidiary,   Gotham Innovation   Lab,   Inc., is in the business of providing media

technology services to the real estate industry. We are focused on expanding the

operations of Gotham by marketing the company to existing and potential new clients.

Year Ended December 31, 2014 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Assets. At December 31, 2014, we had $260,217 in current assets and $280,786

in total assets, compared to $1,050,746 in current assets and $1,071,342 in total assets as

of December 31, 2013.   The decrease in total assets was primarily due to a decrease in

16




accounts receivable and a decrease in assets from discontinued operations as a result of

iGambit collecting all of its receivables in 2014.

Liabilities. At December 31, 2014, we had total liabilities of $285,277 compared

to $515,155 at December 31, 2013. Our total liabilities at December 31, 2014 consisted

of  accounts  payable  of  $285,277,  whereas  our  total  liabilities at  December  31, 2013

consisted of accounts payable  of  $316,566,  a  convertible  note  payable  of $40,250,  a

derivative liability for certain provisions of the convertible note of $152,076 and a note to

a related party of $6,263, The decrease in liabilities was primarily due to a repayment of a

convertible note payable and repayment of a note payable to unrelated parties. We do not

have any long term liabilities.

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency). Our Stockholders’ Deficiency was $(4,491) at

December  31,  2014  compared  to  Stockholders’  Equity  of  $556,187  at  December 31,

2013. This decrease was due to an increase in accumulated deficit from $(2,197,857) at

December 31, 2013 to $(2,882,199) at December 31, 2014 resulting from net loss of

$(684,342) for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to net income of $250,489

for the year ended December 31, 2013

Revenue and Net Income. We had revenue of $1,068,617 for the year ended

December 31, 2014, compared to revenue of $1,461,183 for the year ended December 31,

2013. The decrease in revenue was due primarily to a decrease in revenue generated by

our Gotham subsidiary as result of closing down the Team5 division. We also earned

other income of $78,493 for the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to the gain

on derivative liability, compared to $660,245 in other income from the IGX Rescission

Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2013. In addition to Gotham’s operations,

we had income from discontinued operations of $17,531 and $317,625 for the year ended

December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.   The decrease in our cost of

sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 was due to a decrease in the cost of the

outsourced photography vendors utilized by Gotham.

General  and  Administrative  Expenses . General  and  Administrative  Expenses

decreased to $1,383,646 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $1,692,556 for the

year ended December 31, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2014 our General and

Administrative  Expenses  consisted  of corporate  administrative  expenses  of  $292,096,

legal  and  accounting  fees  of  $111,477,  payroll  expenses  of  $731,606,  Directors  and

Officers Insurance of $43,754, employee benefits expenses of $74,975 (medical, dental,

retirement plan, and life insurance), $74,664 in stock based compensation expense, and

a bad debt write off of $55,074. For the year ended December 31, 2013 our General and

Administrative  Expenses  consisted  of corporate  administrative  expenses  of  $269,596,

legal and accounting fees of $153,113, payroll expenses of $1,082,212, Directors and

Officers Insurance of $40,381, employee benefits expenses of $117,079 (medical, dental,

retirement plan, and life insurance), and business advisory fees, commissions and

expenses primarily  associated with the  IGX purchase and rescission transaction, of

$30,175. Therefore the decreases from the year ended December 31, 2013 to the year

ended December 31, 2014 relate primarily to a decrease in payroll and employee benefits

17




expenses.  In  the  event  the  company effectuates  an  acquisition in  2015  we  anticipate

additional professional fees associated with the acquisition.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

General

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, at December

31, 2014, we had $133,436 of cash and stockholders’ deficit of $(4,491). At December

31, 2013, we had $26,870 of cash and stockholders’ equity of $556,187.

Our primary capital requirements in 2015 are likely to arise from the expansion of

our  Gotham  operations,  and,  in  the  event  we  effectuate  an  acquisition,  from:  (i) the

amount of the purchase price payable in cash at closing, if any; (ii) professional fees

associated with the negotiation, structuring, and closing of the transaction; and (iii) post

closing costs. It is not possible to quantify those costs at this point in time, in that they

depend on Gotham’s business opportunities, the state of the overall economy, the relative

size of any target company we identify and the complexity of the related acquisition

transaction(s). We  anticipate  raising capital in the  private markets to cover any such

costs, though there can be no guaranty we will be able to do so on terms we deem to be

acceptable. We do not have any plans at this point in time to obtain a line of credit or

other loan facility from a commercial bank.

While  we  believe  in  the  viability of  our  strategy to  improve  Gotham’s  sales

volume and to acquire companies, and in our ability to raise additional funds, there can

be no assurances that we will be able to fully effectuate our business plan.

We believe we will continue to increase our cash position and liquidity for the

foreseeable future. We believe we have enough capital to fund our present operations.

Cash Flow Activity

Net cash provided by  operating activities was $165,805 for the year ended

December 31, 2014, compared to net cash used by operating activities of $183,151 for

the year ended December 31, 2013. Net cash used by continuing operating activities was

$489,941 for the  year ended December 31, 2014, compared to net  cash provided by

continuing operating activities of $134,474 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Our

primary source of operating cash flows from continuing operating activities for the year

ended December 31, 2014 was from our Gotham subsidiary’s revenues of $1,068,617 and

$1,461,183 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Additional contributing factors to the

change were from a decrease in accounts receivable of $53,621, an increase in prepaid

expenses of $34,520, a decrease in accounts payable of $37,552 and a decrease in the

receivable due from the IGX rescission agreement of $239,779.   Net cash provided by

discontinued operating activities was $655,746 for the year ended December 31, 2014

and  cash  used  in  discontinued  operating  activities  was  $317,625  for  the  year  ended

December 31, 2013. Cash provided by discontinued operations for the year ended

December 31, 2014 consisted of $655,746 in cash payments received from DDC against

accounts receivable included in the Assets from Discontinued Operations.

18




Cash used by investing activities was $4,739 for the year ended December 31, 2014

and cash provided by investing activities was $1,800 for the year ended December 31,

2013. For the year ended December 31, 2014 the primary use of cash from investing

activities was from purchases of property and equipment of $2,026 and an increase in

deposits of $2,713. For the year ended December 31, 2013 the primary source of cash

provided by investing activities was from a decrease in deposits.

Cash used by financing activities was $(54,500) for the year ended December 31,

2014 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $103,500 for the year ended

December  31,  2013.  The  cash  flows  used  by financing activities  for  the  year  ended

December 31, 2014 was primarily from repayment of the convertible note payable. The

cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was

from the issuance of a Convertible note payable to at an unrelated party.

Supplemental Cash Flow Activity

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014  the  company  paid  interest  of  $10,033

compared to interest of $3,524 in the year ended December 31, 2013.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no off balance-sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT

MARKET RISK

Not Required.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Financial Statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Report beginning

on page F-1, as follows:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

F-3

Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and

F-4

2013

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the years ended      F-5

December 31, 2014 and 2013

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014

F-6

and 2013

Notes to Financial Statements

F-7

19




ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, as required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 and

15d-15  of  the  Exchange  Act  under the  supervision and  with the  participation of our

management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the

effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and

15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2014. Based upon that evaluation,

our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure

controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2014.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

We  are  responsible  for  establishing and  maintaining adequate  internal  control

over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-

15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by,

or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer)

and Chief Financial Officer (our principal accounting and financial officer), and effected

by  our board of directors, management  and other personnel, to provide reasonable

assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial

statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and

procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately

and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary

to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are

being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management

and our directors; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of

unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a

material effect on the financial statements.

Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our

management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of

published financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over

financial reporting may not prevent or  detect misstatements. Also, projections of any

evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may

become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance

with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

20




Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control

over   financial   reporting   as   of   December 31,   2014.   In   making   this   assessment,

management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control Integrated Framework

issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission

(COSO). Based on management’s assessment, we concluded that, as of December 31,

2014, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Change in Internal Controls

During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, there were no changes in our

internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely

to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS , EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE

GOVERNANCE

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our board of directors manages our business and affairs. Under our Articles of

Incorporation and Bylaws, the Board will consist of not less than one, nor more than

seven directors. Currently, our Board consists of five directors.

The  names,  ages,  positions  and  dates  appointed  of  our  current  directors  and

executive officers are set forth below.

Name

Age

Position

Appointed

John Salerno

76     Chief Executive Officer, President, March 2009

Chairman of the Board, and

(appointed Chairman

Director

and Director in

April 2000)

Elisa Luqman

50     Chief Financial Officer, Executive March 2009

Vice President, General Counsel,

(appointed Director

and Director

in August 2009)

James J. Charles

72     Director

March 2006

George G. Dempster

75     Director

January 2001

John Keefe

72     Director

July 2013

John Salerno, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board,

and  Director. Mr.  Salerno  is  a  seasoned  hands-on  executive  with  over  40 years  of

experience with public and private computer software and service companies.

21




Mr. Salerno built a multi-million dollar business from a start up, servicing the real estate

industry. The business was sold in 1984 and Mr. Salerno provided consulting services to

a wide range of clients through 1995. In 1996, along with his daughter and a small group

of private accredited investors, he co-founded the Company. Mr. Salerno was President

and  CEO of the Company from  April 1, 2000 until  February 28, 2006.  After signing

contracts with Verizon and Cablevision, the Company sold its assets in 2006 to Digi-Data

Corporation. From March 1, 2006 thru February 2009 Mr. Salerno served as President of

the Vault Services Division of Digi-Data Corporation. Upon the expiration of his 3 year

contract the Vault Services Division was at a revenue run rate of $12 million annually. As

of March 1, 2009, Mr. Salerno returned to his full time management roll at the Company.

Mr. Salerno is an ex — US Marine Corps, Crypto/ Communications Officer and has a BS

in Mathematics from Fordham University. Mr. Salerno is Elisa Luqman’s father.

Mr. Salerno was nominated as a Director because if his intimate knowledge of the

Company and its history as a founder. Additionally, Mr. Salerno’s mathematical and

technical background as a data center manager early in his professional career and later as

a software developer offers the board hand’s on technical experience in both operations

and software analysis.     Mr. Salerno utilized his experience and contacts to secure the

major customers driving the sales that generate the Company’s payment stream from

DDC.   Moreover, Mr. Salerno adds value to Gotham through his 40 plus years serving

the New York Real Estate industry. He is thoroughly familiar with the unique workings

of the New York real estate industry and has many contacts within that community that

are a benefit to Gotham.

Elisa Luqman,  Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,  General

Counsel, and Director. Ms. Luqman is a computer literate attorney with over 18 years

experience with intellectual property and computer software. Prior to co-founding the

Company,   Ms. Luqman   was   president   of   University   Software   Corp.,   a   software

development company focused on a wide range of student educational and intellectual

applications. Ms. Luqman was Chief Operating Officer of the Company, from April 1,

2000   until   February 28,   2006. From   March 1,   2006   through February 28,   2009

Ms. Luqman was employed as Chief Operating Officer of the Vault Services Division of

Digi-Data Corporation, the company that acquired the Company’s assets in 2006, and

subsequently  during  her  tenure  with  Digi-Data  Corporation  she  became  the  in-house

general  counsel  for  the  entire  corporation.  In  that  capacity  she  was  responsible  for

acquisitions, mergers, patents, and employee contracts, and worked very closely with

Digi-Data’s outside counsel firms, DLA-Piper, the Law Offices of Sandra T. Carr and the

patent firm of Jordan and Hamburg.  As of March 1, 2009, Ms.  Luqman rejoined the

Company in her current capacities. Ms Luqman received a BA degree in Marketing, a JD

in  Law,  and  a  MBA  Degree  in  Finance  from  Hofstra  University.  Ms. Luqman  is  a

member of the bar in New York and New Jersey. Ms. Luqman is John Salerno’s

daughter.

Ms. Luqman was nominated as a Director because of her intimate knowledge of

the Company and its history as a founder.   Additionally, as an attorney, Ms. Luqman’s

legal  background enables her to provide  counsel  to the  Company.  Her experience  as

general counsel to the Company provides her with a unique insight into the Company’s

22




contracts with customers and vendors, intellectual property assets and issues, financing

transactions and shareholder transactions. Moreover, having been through the merger

and acquisition process on both sides of the table, Ms. Luqman offers the Company in-

house guidance throughout the acquisition process. That combined with Ms. Luqman’s

MBA in Finance aids in providing the Board with more efficient analysis of input from

outside auditors and legal advisors.

James J. Charles, Director. Mr. Charles is a high profile financial executive

with a broad base of experience with firms ranging in size from $24MM to $180MM in

annual revenue. He worked closely with management and Boards of Directors on matters

ranging from mergers and acquisitions to stock restructurings and spin-offs. Mr. Charles

has been a self employed Certified Public Accountant from 1999 to present. From 1994

to 1999 Mr. Charles was the chief financial officer of Interpharm Holdings, Inc.

Interpharm Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiary, Interpharm, Inc., engaged in the

development, manufacture, and marketing of generic prescription strength and over-the-

counter  pharmaceuticals  in  the  United  States.  It  also  focused  on  the  development  of

products in the areas of female hormone, scheduled narcotic, soft gelatin capsule, oral

liquid, products coming off patent, and other products. From 1966 to 1994 Mr. Charles

was a Senior Managing Partner with Ernst & Young. Mr. Charles’ education includes

studies   and   management   programs   at   Harvard   University and   Williams   College.

Mr. Charles received his BBA in Accounting at Manhattan College.

Mr. Charles was nominated as a Director because of his financial expertise. He

has been involved in the practice of public accounting for over forty years.   During his

tenure  as  a  Senior  Managing  Partner  at  Ernst  &  Young  he  spent  considerable  years

analyzing potential acquisition targets for corporate clients and has particular experience

and skills on matter such as mergers and acquisitions, stock restructuring and spin-offs.

He has also been a Chief Financial Officer of a public company.

George G. Dempster, Director. Mr. Dempster was Commissioner of Commerce

for the State of New York from 1979 to 1983. He served as the Chairman of the Finance

Committee for Hofstra University for 25 years from 1976 through 2001, and is currently

Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Dempster has been the Chairman of

Tran-Leisure Corp. since 1983, and was its CEO from 1983-2002. Tran -Leisure Corp is

a diversified holding company with interests ranging from helicopter services to

manufacturing. From 1969 to 1973 Mr. Dempster served as the CEO of Cybernetics, a

major computer software developer. Mr. Dempster served as a marketing manager for

IBM from 1961 to 1968. Mr. Dempster has a BA in business administration from Hofstra

University.

Mr. Dempster was nominated as a Director because of his strong administrative,

financial and economic background. Having served as Commissioner of Commerce for

the State of New York for 4 years and on the Board of Hofstra University for over 25

years, Mr. Dempster provides the Company with extensive experience in commerce and

administration in both the private and public sectors.     Moreover, during his tenure at

Hofstra   University   Mr.   Dempster   was   intimately   involved   in   several   financing

transactions to maintain the University in a solvent and profitable manner. Additionally,

23




having been CEO of a diversified holding company, Mr. Dempster is thoroughly familiar

with the merger and acquisition process. He offers years of experience analyzing

business, their models and economics, and identifying the appropriate financing vehicles.

John Keefe, Director. Mr. Keefe is an investment banker, venture capitalist, founder

of three businesses, and a turnaround consultant to businesses in trouble. Since 2011 to

Present, Mr. Keefe is the Founder and Chief Development Officer of Security Capital

Advisors  LLC, located in Jersey City,  NJ. Security Capital Advisors  LLC is  a  firm

providing indirect financing to local governments in the US. From 2007 to 2011 Mr.

Keefe was Managing Director of Nachman Hays Brownstein, located in New York, NY.

Nachman   Hays   Brownstein   is   a   national   turnaround   management   firm,   assisting

underperforming and troubled companies, maximizing value for owners, investors,

creditors and employees. Mr. Keefe was also a founding General Partner of a venture

capital firm, a founder and CFO of a computer software company, a Senior Vice

President of an investment banking firm, and emergency CFO and Chief Restructuring

Officer of several distressed businesses. He is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard

Business School.

Mr. Keefe’ was nominated as a Director because of his financial expertise

combined  with  his  strong  technical  background.  He  started  his career as  a  computer

software  engineer  and  designer  for  IBM,  General  Electric,  and  Litton  Industries.  He

evolved into the financial arena serving many years a corporate Chief Financial Officer.

He   is now involved in the practice of venture capital and investment banking   He has

particular skills acting as a turnaround consultant to businesses in trouble being a

‘Certified  Turnaround  Professional’  by  the  Turnaround  Management  Association.  He

offers  years  of  experience  analyzing  business,  their  revenue  models,  and  identifying

appropriate financing vehicles.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board has established an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee.

The Board does not currently have a Nominating Committee. The work typically

conducted by a Nominating Committee is conducted by the full Board.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee presently   consists of Messrs. Charles, Keefe and

Dempster, with Mr. Charles serving as chairman. Our Board has determined that

Mr. Charles  qualifies  as  an  “audit  committee  financial  expert”  as  defined  under  the

federal securities laws. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing

our financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, they

recommend the selection of the independent auditors and consult with management and

our independent auditors prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders

and the filing of our forms 10-Q and 10-K. The Audit Committee has adopted a charter

and it is posted on our web site at www.igambit.com.

24




Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee presently consists of Messrs. Charles, Keefe and

Dempster, with Mr. Keefe serving as chairman. The Compensation Committee is

responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board the compensation and over-all

benefits of our executive officers, including administering the Company’s 2006  Long

Term Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee may, but is not required to, consult

with  outside  compensation  consultants.  The  Compensation  Committee  has  adopted  a

charter and the charter is posted on our web site at www.igambit.com.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished

to the Company under Rule 16a-3(e) under the Exchange Act during its most recent fiscal

year and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to its

most recent fiscal year, and any written representation to the Company from the reporting

person that no Form 5 is required, no person who, at any time during the fiscal year, was

a director, officer, beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the Company’s Common

Stock, or any other person known to the Company to be subject to section 16 of the

Exchange Act with respect to the Company, failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed

in the above Forms, reports required by section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the

most recent fiscal year or prior fiscal years, except as described below:

Name

No. of Late Reports

No. of transactions

Failure to file a

that were not

required Form

reported on a timely

basis

John Salerno

2

2

0

Elisa Luqman

2

1

0

CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its principal executive

officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons

performing similar functions.    A copy of the Code of Ethics is attached as an exhibit to

this report. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website at

www.igambit.com. Any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics will be

disclosed on the Company’s website at www.igambit.com.

25




ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation received by our executive

officers, for their service, during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Current

Nonqualified

Officers

Non-equity

Deferred

Name &

Option

Incentive Plan      Compensation

All Other

Principal

Salary      Bonus     Stock     Awards      Compensation

Earnings

Compensation

Total

Position

Year

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

John

Salerno

2014     131,250

0

0

0

0

0

13,206(1)

144,456

CEO,

President

2013     200,000

0

0

0

0

0

10,237(2)

210,237

Chairman

& Director     2012     200,000

0

0

0

0

0

10,237(3)

235,237

Elisa

Luqman

2014     143,746

0

0

0

0

0

36,514(4)

180,260

Acting

CFO,

2013     200,000

0

0

0

0

0

30,125(5)

230,125

EVP,  GC

and

2012     200,000

0

0

0

0

0

27,7957(6)

227,795

Director

(1)    Includes $6,264 in health insurance premiums and $6,942 in life insurance

premiums.

(2)    Includes $6,168 in health insurance premiums and $4,069 in life insurance

premiums.

(3)    Includes $6,168 in health insurance premiums and $4,069 in life insurance

premiums.

(4)    Includes $36,514 in health and dental insurance premiums.

(5)    Includes $30,125 in health and dental insurance premiums.

(6)    Includes $27,795 in health and dental insurance premiums.

Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

The Company does not currently have  any employment agreements with it executive

officers.

26




Compensation of the Board of Directors

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDS

Equity

Equity

Incentive

Incentive

Plan

Market

Plan

Awards:

Value      Awards:     Market or

Equity

of

Number

Payout

Incentive

Number    Shares

of

Value of

Plan

of

or

Unearned    Unearned

Awards:

Shares

Units

Shares,

Shares,

Number of

Number of

Number of

or Units

of

Units or

Units or

Securities

Securities

Securities

of Stock Stock

Other

Other

Underlying

Underlying

Underlying

That

That

Rights

Rights

Unexercised Unexercised     Unexercised Option

Have

Have

That

That

Options

Options

Unearned Exercise

Option

Not

Not

Have Not    Have Not

(#)

(#)

Options

Price

Expiration

Vested     Vested      Vested

Vested

Exercisable    Unexercisable

(#)

($)

Date

(#)

($)

(#)

(#)

Name (a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

James Charles

59,000

0

0

$0.03

06/09/2024

0

0

0

0

James Charles

100,000

0

0

$0.03

06/09/2024

0

0

0

0

George

Dempster

113,000

0

0

$0.03   06/09/202424

0

0

0

0

George

Dempster

100,000

0

0

$0.03

06/09/2024

0

0

0

0

John Keefe

600,000

0

0

$0.03

06/09/2024

0

0

0

0

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  compensation  received  by  our  directors,  for  their

service as directors, during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Nonqualified

Fees

Non-equity

deferred

earned or

Stock

Option

incentive plan

compensation

All other

paid in

awards

awards

compensation

earnings

compensation

Total

Name

cash ($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

John Salerno (1)

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

Elisa Luqman (1)

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

James J. Charles

$4,000

-

-

-

-

$4,000

George G. Dempster

$4,000

-

-

-

-

$4,000

John Keefe

$4,000

-

-

-

-

$4,000

27




(1) These individuals serve as executive officers of the Company, and do  not

receive any compensation for the services they provide as directors of the

Company.

Members of our Board receive $1,000 per quarter for their service to the Company.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information known to us, as of April 15, 2015,

relating to the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock by: (i) each person who is

known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding

common stock; (ii) each director; (iii) each executive officer; and (iv) all executive

officers and directors as a group. Under securities laws, a person is considered to be the

beneficial  owner of securities owned by him  (or certain persons whose  ownership is

attributed to him) or securities that can be acquired by him within 60 days, including

upon the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities. The Company determines

a beneficial owner’s percentage ownership by  assuming that options, warrants and

convertible securities that are held by the beneficial owner and which are exercisable

within 60 days, have been exercised or converted. The Company believes that all persons

named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of

common stock shown as being owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address

of each beneficial owner in the table set forth below is care of iGambit Inc., 1050 W.

Jericho Turnpike, New York, 11787. The percentages in the following table are based

upon 25,044,056 shares outstanding as of April 15, 2015.

Amount and Nature

of Beneficial

Name of Beneficial Owner

Ownership

Percent of Class

John Salerno, C.E.O., President, Chairman

of the Board, and Director

5,146,900(1)

%

Elisa Luqman, C.F.O., Executive Vice

President, General Counsel and Director

5,685,000,(2)

%

James J. Charles, Director

600,000(3)

%

George G. Dempster, Director

605,000(4)

%

Mehul Mehta

2,450,000

%

Executive Officers and Directors as a

Group:

12,539,900 (4)

%

1.    Includes: options to purchase 46,900 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share held by John L.

Salerno, Mr. Salerno’s son; and options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per

share held by Dean T. Salerno, Mr. Salerno’s son.

2.    Includes 685,000 shares of common stock held by Muhammad Luqman, Ms. Luqman’s husband.

3.    Includes options to purchase 159,000 shares of the common stock at $0.03 per share.

4.    Includes options to purchase 213,000 shares of the common stock at $0.03 per share.

5.    Includes the disclosures in footnotes 1 through 4 above.

28




ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

None.

BOARD INDEPENDENCE

The Company has elected to use the independence standards of the NYSE AMEX

Equities Exchange in its determination of whether the members of its Board are

independent. Based on the foregoing, the Company has concluded that Mr. Charles and

Mr. Dempster are independent. The Board has established an Audit Committee and a

Compensation Committee. The Board does not currently have a Nominating Committee.

The  work  typically  conducted  by a  Nominating  Committee  is  conducted  by the  full

Board.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table shows what Michael F. Albanese, CPA and Fiondella, Milone

& LaSaracina, LLP billed for the audit and other services for the year ended December

31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 respectively.

Year Ended  Year Ended

12/31/ 2014    12/31/2013

Audit Fees

$

39,725  $

45,000

Audit-Related Fees

-

---

All Tax Fees

---

Other Fees

---

Total

$

39,725  $

45,000

Audit Fees — This category includes the audit of the Company’s annual financial

statements, review of financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-Q

Quarterly Reports and services that are normally provided by the independent auditors in

connection with engagements for those years.

Audit-Related Fees This category includes assurance and related services by

the independent auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or

review of the Company’s financial statements and that are not reported under the caption

“Audit Fees.”

Tax Fees — This category includes services rendered by the independent auditor

for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

29




All Other Fees This category includes products and services provided by the

independent auditor other than the services reported under the captions “Audit Fees,”

“Audit-Related Fees,” and “Tax Fees.”

Overview The Company’s Audit Committee, reviews, and in its sole

discretion pre-approves, our independent auditors’ annual engagement letter including

proposed fees and all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors.

Accordingly,  all  services  described  under  “Audit  Fees,”  “Audit-Related  Fees,”  “Tax

Fees,” and “All Other Fees” were pre-approved by our Company’s Audit Committee. The

Audit  Committee  may not  engage  the  independent  auditors  to perform  the  non-audit

services proscribed by law or regulation. The Company’s Audit Committee may delegate

pre-approval authority to a member of the Board of Directors, and authority delegated in

such manner must be reported at the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

F-3

Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and

F-4

2013

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the years

F-5

ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014

F-6

and 2013

Notes to Financial Statements

F-7

(b) Exhibits

Exhibit No. Description

3.1(i)     Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on

April 13, 2000 (1)

3.1(ii)

Certificate of Merger, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on

April 18, 2000 (1)

3.1(iii)

Certificate of Amendment Changing Name, filed with the Delaware

Secretary of State on December 19, 2000 (1)

3.1(iv)

Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on

February 17, 2006 (1)

3.1(v) Certificate of Amendment Changing Name filed with the Delaware

Secretary of State on April 5, 2006 (1)

3.1(vi)

Certificate of Amendment Increasing Authorized Common Stock to 75

Million Shares, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 2,

2009 (1)

3.2

Bylaws (1)

30




4.1

Form of Stock Certificate (2)

4.2

Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Roetzel & Andress (3)

10.1

iGambit Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, Amended 12/31/2006 (1)

10.2

Employment Agreement between Digi-Data Corporation and Mr. Salerno

(2)

10.3

Employment Agreement between Digi-Data Corporation and Mrs. Luqman

(2)

14

Code of Ethics (5)

21

Subsidiaries (1)

31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for

the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as

amended or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this

exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing

under the Security Act of 1933, as amended, or by the Security Exchange

Act of 1934, as amended.)

32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for

the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as

amended or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this

exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing

under the Security Act of 1933, as amended, or by the Security Exchange

Act of 1934, as amended.)

(1) Incorporated by reference to Form 10 filed on December 31, 2009.

(2) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Form 10 filed on June 11, 2010.

(3) Filed with initial Form 10-K on June 15, 2010.

(4) We hereby agree to furnish the SEC with any omitted schedule or exhibit upon

request.

(5) Filed with Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) on September 13, 2010.

31




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the

registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by

the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Hauppauge, New York, on

April 15, 2015.

iGambit Inc.

April 15, 2015

By:  /s/ John Salerno

John Salerno, Chief Executive

Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this

Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons in the capacities

indicated:

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ John Salerno

Chief Executive Officer and

Director

April 15, 2015

John Salerno

/s/ Elisa Luqman

Chief Financial Officer, Executive

April 15, 2015

Vice President, General Counsel,

Elisa Luqman

Principal Accounting Officer and

Director

/s/ James J. Charles

Director

April 15, 2015

James J. Charles

/s/ George G. Dempster

Director

April 15, 2015

George G. Dempster

/s/ John Keefe

Director

April 15, 2015

John Keefe

32




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of iGambit Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of iGambit Inc. as of December

31, 2014, and the related consolidated statement of operations, consolidated statement of

changes in stockholders’ equity (deficiency), and consolidated statement of cash flows for the

year ended December 31, 2014. iGambit Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial

statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on

our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting

Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to

obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material

misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of

its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control

over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the

circumstances,  but  not for  the  purpose  of expressing  an  opinion  on  the  effectiveness of  the

company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An

audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures

in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates

made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We

believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,

the financial position of iGambit Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and the results of its operations

and  its  cash  flows  for  the  year  in  the  period  ended  December  31,  2014,  in  conformity  with

accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Michael F. Albanese

Michael F. Albanese, CPA

Parsippany, New Jersey

April 15, 2015

F-1




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

iGambit, Inc.

Smithtown, New York

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of iGambit, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Fiondella, Milone & LaSaracina, LLP

Glastonbury, Connecticut

March 31, 2014

F-2




IGAMBIT INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31,

2014

2013

ASSETS

Current assets

Cash

$

133,436

$

26,870

Accounts receivable, net

81,671

135,292

Prepaid expenses

45,110

10,590

Due from rescission agreement

--

239,779

Assets from discontinued operations, net

--

638,215

Total current assets

260,217

1,050,746

Property and equipment, net

8,436

11,176

Other assets

Deposits

12,133

9,420

$

280,786

$

1,071,342

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

Current liabilities

Accounts payable

$

285,277

$

316,566

Convertible note payable

--

40,250

Derivative liability

--

152,076

Note payable - related party

--

6,263

Total current liabilities

285,277

515,155

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity (deficiency)

Preferred stock, $.001 par value; authorized - 100,000,000 shares;

issued and outstanding - 0 shares in 2014 and 2013, respectively

--

--

Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized - 200,000,000 shares;

issued and outstanding - 26,583,990 shares in 2014 and

25,044,056 shares in 2013

26,584

25,044

Additional paid-in capital

2,851,124

2,729,000

Accumulated deficit

(2,882,199)

(2,197,857)

Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)

(4,491)

556,187

$

280,786

$

1,071,342

F-3




IGAMBIT INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

2014

2013

Sales

$

1,068,617

$

1,461,183

Cost of sales

465,337

496,008

Gross profit

603,280

965,175

Operating expenses

General and administrative expenses

1,383,646

1,692,556

Loss from operations

(780,366)

(727,381)

Other income (expenses)

Gain on derivative liability

152,076

--

Interest expense

(10,333)

(54,505)

Amortization of debt discount

(63,250)

(40,250)

Income from rescission agreement

--

755,000

Total other income (expenses)

78,493

660,245

Loss from continuing operations

(701,873)

(67,136)

Income from discontinued operations

17,531

317,625

Net income (loss)

$

(684,342)

$

250,489

Basic and fully diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

Continuing operations

$

(.03)

$

.00

Discontinued operations

$

.00

$

.01

Net earnings per common share

$

(.03)

$

.01

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic

25,947,791

25,044,056

Weighted average common shares outstanding - fully diluted

27,373,471

25,987,956

F-4




IGAMBIT INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013

Additional

Common stock

Paid-in

Accumulated

Shares

Amount

Capital

Deficit

Totals

Balances, December 31, 2012

25,044,056

$     25,044

$     2,729,000

$ (2,448,346)

$ 305,698

Net income

250,489

250,489

Balances, December 31, 2013

25,044,056

25,044

2,729,000

(2,197,857)

556,187

Note payable converted to common

stock

1,539,934

1,540

47,460

--

49,000

Compensation for vested stock

options

--

--

74,664

--

74,664

Net loss

(684,342)

(684,342)

Balances, December 31, 2014

26,583,990

$     26,584

$     2,851,124

$ (2,882,199)

$      (4,491)

F-5




IGAMBIT INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

2014

2013

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income (loss)

$    (684,342)

$

250,489

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net

cash provided (used) by operating activities

Income from discontinued operations

(17,531)

(317,625)

Depreciation

4,766

6,694

Debt discount interest expense

--

48,576

Debt discount amortization

63,250

40,250

Stock-based compensation expense

74,664

--

Gain on derivative liability

(152,076)

--

Increase (Decrease) in cash flows as a result of

changes in asset and liability account balances:

Accounts receivable

53,621

23,149

Prepaid expenses

(34,520)

122,487

Due from rescission agreement

239,779

(239,779)

Accounts payable

(37,552)

(117,392)

Net cash (used) provided by continuing operating activities

(489,941)

134,474

Net cash provided (used) by discontinued operating activities

655,746

(317,625)

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

165,805

(183,151)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Purchases of property and equipment

(2,026)

--

(Increase) decrease in deposits

(2,713)

1,800

Repayments of notes receivable

--

--

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

(4,739)

1,800

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Proceeds from stockholder's loan

3,600

--

Repayments of stockholder's loan

(3,600)

--

Proceeds from convertible note payable

--

103,500

Repayments of convertible note payable

(54,500)

--

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

(54,500)

103,500

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH

106,566

(77,851)

CASH - BEGINNING OF YEAR

26,870

104,721

CASH - END OF YEAR

$

133,436

$

26,870

F-6




IGAMBIT INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation

The   consolidated   financial   statements   presented   are   those   of   iGambit   Inc.,   (the

“Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gotham Innovation Lab Inc. (“Gotham”).

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 13,

2000. The Company was originally incorporated as Compusations Inc. under the laws of

the State of New York on October 2, 1996. The Company  changed its name to

BigVault.com Inc. upon changing its state of domicile on April 13, 2000. The Company

changed its name again to bigVault Storage Technologies Inc. on December 21, 2000

before changing to iGambit Inc. on April 5, 2006.   Gotham was incorporated under the

laws of  the state  of New York on September 23, 2009. The  Company is a  holding

company which seeks out acquisitions of operating companies in technology markets.

Gotham is in the business of providing media technology services to real estate agents

and brokers in the New York metropolitan area.

Note 2 –Discontinued Operations

Sale of Business

On February 28, 2006, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Digi-

Data Corporation (“Digi-Data”), whereby Digi-Data acquired the Company’s assets and

its online digital vaulting business operations in exchange for $1,500,000, which was

deposited into an escrow account for payment of the Company’s outstanding liabilities.

In addition, as part of the sales agreement, the Company received payments from Digi-

Data based on 10% of the net vaulting revenue payable quarterly over five years.   The

Company was also entitled to an additional 5% of the increase in net vaulting revenue

over the prior year’s revenue. These adjustments to the sales price were included in the

discontinued operations line of the statements of operations for the year ended December

31, 2011, the last year of payments.

The assets of the discontinued operations are presented in the balance sheets under the

captions “Assets from discontinued operations”. The underlying assets of the

discontinued operations consist of accounts receivable of $0 and $570,590 as of

December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and of accrued interest receivable of $0 and

$67,625 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Accounts Receivable

Assets from discontinued operations, net includes accounts receivable which represents

50% of contingency payments earned for the previous quarters. The reserve for bad debts

of $250,000 charged to operations in 2010 was reversed in connection with the Summary

Judgment and Forbearance Agreement described in Note 11.   Also included is accrued

interest receivable of $85,156 recorded for interest granted on the balance due from Digi-

F-7




data through May 2014. The entire balance including accrued interest totaling $655,746

was repaid to the Company by Digi-data in the year ended December 31, 2014

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  the  Company  and  its

wholly-owned subsidiary, Gotham Innovation Lab, Inc.  All intercompany accounts and

transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting

principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the

reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and

liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of

revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,

accounts receivable, accounts payable, and amounts due to related parties, the carrying

amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Additionally, there are no

assets or liabilities for which fair value is remeasured on a recurring basis.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from the sale of products and services

rendered to real estate brokers. The Company recognizes revenues when the services or

products have been provided or delivered, the fees charged are fixed or determinable, the

Company and its customers understand the specific nature and terms of the agreed upon

transactions, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs for the years

ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $3,543 and $5,786, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include checking and

money market accounts and any highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity

of three months or less.

F-8




Accounts Receivable

The Company analyzes the collectability of accounts receivable from continuing

operations each accounting period and adjusts its allowance for doubtful accounts

accordingly. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the realization

of  accounts receivables, including the creditworthiness of each  customer, current  and

historical collection history and the related aging of past due balances. The Company

evaluates  specific  accounts  when  it  becomes  aware  of  information  indicating  that  a

customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its

financial condition, lower credit ratings, bankruptcy or other factors affecting the ability

to render payment. Allowance for doubtful accounts was $17,865 at December 31, 2014

and 2013, respectively. Bad debt expense of $4,295 and $0 was charged to operations for

the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Property and equipment and depreciation

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation for both financial reporting and

income tax purposes is computed using combinations of the straight line and accelerated

methods over the estimated lives of the respective assets. Computer equipment is

depreciated over 5 years and furniture and fixtures are depreciated over 7 years.

Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. When property and

equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated

depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gain or loss is credited or

charged to income.

Depreciation expense of $4,766 and $6,694was charged to operations for the years ended

December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The   Company   accounts   for   its   stock-based   awards   granted   under   its   employee

compensation plan in accordance  with ASC Topic  No. 718-20, Awards Classified as

Equity, which requires the measurement of compensation expense  for all  share-based

compensation granted to employees and non-employee directors at fair value on the date

of grant and recognition of compensation expense over the related service period for

awards expected to vest.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to

estimate  the  fair  value  of  its  stock  options  and  warrants.  The  Black-Scholes  option

pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected

stock price volatility of the Company’s common stock, the risk free interest rate at the

date of grant, the expected vesting term of the grant, expected dividends, and an

assumption related to forfeitures of such grants.  Changes in these subjective input

assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate of the Company’s stock options

and warrants.

F-9




Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in

accordance with ASC Topic No. 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax

assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and

tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws

that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic No. 740 for the financial statement

recognition,  measurement  and  disclosure  of  uncertain  tax  positions  recognized  in  the

Company’s financial statements . In accordance with this provision, tax positions must

meet  a  more-likely-than-not  recognition  threshold  and  measurement  attribute  for  the

financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

FASB ASC 606 ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from contracts with customers:

In May 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance on contracts with customers to transfer

goods or services or contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those

contracts  are  within  the  scope  of  other  standards  (e.g.,  insurance  contracts  or  lease

contracts). The guidance requires an entity  to recognize revenue on contracts with

customers to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount

that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for

those goods or services. The guidance requires that an entity depict the consideration by

applying the following steps:

Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 3: Determine the transaction price.

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after

December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early

application is not permitted. This amendment is to be either retrospectively adopted to

each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of

initially applying this ASU recognized at the date of initial application. Adoption of this

guidance  is  not  expected  to  have  a  material  impact  on  the  Company's  consolidated

financial statements.

FASB ASC 718 ASU 2014-12 – Compensation – Stock Compensation:

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Compensation – Stock Compensation

(Topic 718):  Accounting  for Share-Based Payments When the  Terms of  an  Award

Provide that a Performance Target Could be Achieved after the Requisite Service

Period," ("ASU      2014-12").      The   amendments   in   ASU   2014-12   require that a

F-10




performance  target  that  affects vesting and that  could be  achieved  after the  requisite

service period be treated as a performance condition.   A reporting entity   should apply

existing guidance in ASC Topic No. 718, "Compensation -Stock Compensation" as it

relates to awards with   performance   conditions that affect   vesting to account for such

awards. The amendments in ASU 2014-12 are effective for annual periods and interim

periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption

is   permitted.      Entities   may apply the   amendments   in   ASU   2014-12   either: (a)

prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date; or (b)

retrospectively to  all  awards  with  performance  targets  that  are  outstanding as  of  the

beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all

new or modified awards thereafter. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of

ASU 2014-12 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 – Earnings Per Common Share

The Company calculates net earnings (loss) per common share in accordance with ASC

260 Earnings Per Share” (“ASC 260”). Basic and diluted net  earnings (loss) per

common share was determined by dividing net earnings (loss) applicable to common

stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the

period. The Company’s potentially dilutive shares, which include outstanding common

stock options and common stock warrants, have not been included in the computation of

diluted net earnings (loss) per share for all periods as the result would be anti-dilutive.

Years Ended

December 31,

2014

2013

Stock options

1,518,900

--

Stock warrants

275,000

--

Total shares excluded from calculation

1,793,900

--

Note 5–Stock Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based award programs, including grants

of  stock options and warrants, is recorded in accordance  with " Compensation—Stock

Compensation ", Topic 718 of the FASB ASC. Stock-based compensation expense, which

is calculated net of estimated forfeitures, is computed using the grant date fair-value and

amortized over the requisite service period for all stock awards that are expected to vest.

The grant date fair value for stock options and warrants is calculated using the Black-

Scholes option pricing model. Determining the fair value of options at the grant date

requires  judgment,  including  estimating the  expected  term  that  stock  options will  be

outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility of the Company’s common stock,

expected dividends, and a risk-free interest rate. Stock-based compensation expense is

reported under general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated

statements of operations.

F-11




Options

In 2006, the Company adopted the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2006 Plan").

Awards granted under the 2006 Plan have a ten-year term and may be incentive stock

options, non-qualified stock options or warrants. The awards are granted at an exercise

price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant and generally vest over a three or

four year period. The Plan expired on December 31, 2009, therefore as of December 31,

2014, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based

compensation arrangements granted under the 2006 plan.

The 2006 Plan provided for the granting of options to purchase up to 10,000,000 shares

of common stock.  8,146,900 options have been issued under the plan to date of which

7,157,038 have been exercised and 692,962 have expired to date.  There were 296,900

options outstanding under the 2006 Plan on its expiration date of December 31, 2009. All

options issued subsequent to this date were not issued pursuant to any plan.

Stock option activity during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 follows:

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Remaining

Weighted

Average

Average

Contractual

Options

Grant-Date

Life

Outstanding

Exercise Price

Fair Value

(Years)

Options outstanding at

December 31, 2012

1,268,900

$

0.08

$

0.10

6.16

Expired

(600,000)

0.10

0.06

Options outstanding at

December 31, 2013

668,900

0.06

0.10

4.69

Options granted

850,000

0.04

0.10

Options outstanding at

December 31, 2014

1,518,900

$

0.03

$

0.10

4.76

Options outstanding at December 31, 2014 consist of:

Date

Number

Number

Exercise

Expiration

Issued

Outstanding

Exercisable

Price

Date

May 1, 2006

100,000

100,000

$0.01

May 1, 2016

May 1, 2006

100,000

100,000

$0.01

May 1, 2016

May 1, 2006

50,000

50,000

$0.01

May 1, 2016

May 1, 2006

46.900

46,900

$0.01

May 1, 2016

June 9, 2014

213,000

213,000

$0.03

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2014

159,000

159,000

$0.03

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2014

600,000

600,000

$0.03

June 9, 2024

June 6, 2014

250,000

250,000

$0.05

June 6, 2019

Total

1,518,900

1,518,900

F-12




Warrants

In  addition  to  the Company's  2006 Long  Term  Incentive  Plan,  the Company has issued  an  outstanding compensatory warrants to two  consultants entitling the holders to purchase a total of

275,000 shares of our common stock at an average exercise price of $0.94 per share.

Warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock vest upon six  months after the

Company engages in an IPO, have an exercise price of $3.00 per share, and expire two

years after the Company engages in an IPO. Warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of

common stock vest 100,000 shares on issuance (June 1, 2009), and 50,000 shares on each

of the following three anniversaries of the date of issuance, have exercise prices ranging

from $0.50 per share to $1.15 per share, and expire on June 1, 2019. The issuance of the

compensatory warrants was not submitted to the Company's shareholders for their approval.

Warrant activity during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 follows:

Weighted

(1)Weighted

Weighted

Average Grant-

Average

Date

Remaining

Warrants

Average

Contractual

Outstanding

Exercise Price

Fair Value

Life (Years)

Warrants outstanding

at December 31, 2012

275,000

$

0.94

$

0.10

6.42

No warrant activity

--

--

--

Warrants outstanding

at December 31, 2013

275,000

$

0.94

$

0.10

5.42

No warrant activity

--

--

--

Warrants outstanding

at December 31, 2014

275,000

$

0.94

$

0.10

4.42

(1) Exclusive of 25,000 warrants expiring two years after initial IPO.

Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2014 consist of:

Date

Number

Number

Exercise

Expiration

Issued

Outstanding

Exercisable

Price

Date

April 1, 2000

25,000

25,000

$3.00

2 years after IPO

June 1, 2009

100,000

100,000

$0.50

June 1, 2019

June 1, 2009

50,000

50,000

$0.65

June 1, 2019

June 1, 2009

50,000

50,000

$0.85

June 1, 2019

June 1, 2009

50,000

50,000

$1.15

June 1, 2019

Total

275,000

275,000

F-13




Note 6 – Convertible Note Payable

On September 16, 2013, the Company issued an 8% convertible note in the aggregate

principal amount of $103,500, convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Note, including accrued interest was due June 18, 2014 and was convertible any time

after 180 days at the option of the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at

55% of the average stock price of the lowest three closing bid prices during the 10 trading

day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date.  Interest

expense on the convertible note of $3,242 was recorded for the year ended December 31,

2014.

Initially the Company had anticipated repaying the obligation prior to the effective date

of the holder electing to convert. Since the effective date of the election to convert has

passed the Company recorded a debt discount related to identified embedded derivatives

relating to conversion features and a reset provisions (see Note 7) based fair values as of

the inception date of the Note. The calculated debt discount equaled the face of the note

and was amortized over the term of the note. During the year ended December 31, 2014,

the Company amortized $63,250 of debt discount. During the year ended December 31,

2014, the note holder converted $49,000 of the principal balance to 1,539,934 shares of

common  stock,  and  the  Company repaid  the  remaining note  balance  of  $54,500  and

accrued interest of $5,646 on June 18, 2014.

Note 7 - Derivative Liability

Convertible Note

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued a convertible note (see

Note 6 above).

The note is convertible into common stock, at the holders’ option, at a discount to the

market price of the Company’s common stock. The Company has identified embedded

derivatives included in these notes as a result of certain anti-dilutive (reset) provisions,

related to certain conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial

instruments requires that the Company record the fair value of the derivatives as of the

inception date of the convertible note and debt discount amortization to fair value as of

each subsequent reporting date. This resulted in a fair value of derivative liability of

$152,076 in which to the extent of the face value of convertible note was treated as debt

discount with the remainder treated as interest expense.

The fair value of the embedded derivatives at  December 31, 2013, in the amount of

$152,076, was determined using the Binomial Option Pricing Model based on the

following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 243.00%, (3)

weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.09%, (4) expected lives of 0.72 to 0.75 years,

and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.51 per share. The

Company recorded interest expense from the excess of the derivative liability over the

convertible  note  of  $48,576  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013.    A  gain  on

F-14




derivative liability of $152,076 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2014

for the satisfaction of the convertible note.

Based upon ASC 840-15-25 (EITF Issue 00-19, paragraph 11) the Company has adopted

a sequencing  approach regarding  the application of ASC 815-40 to its outstanding

convertible note. Pursuant to the sequencing approach, the Company evaluates its

contracts based upon earliest issuance date.

Note 8–Stock Transactions

On September 25, 2014, the Board unanimously approved an amendment to the

Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of Common Stock

which  the  Company is authorized to issue  from  seventy five  million  (75,000,000) to

Three Hundred Million (300,000,000) shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per

share, and to create a new class of stock entitled “preferred stock” (together, the

“Capitalization Amendments”). Pursuant to t he Capitalization Amendments the total number of shares of stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is three hundred million (300,000,000) shares consisting of two hundred million (200,000,000) shares of Common Stock with a par value of one tenth of one cent ($.001) per share, and one hundred million (100,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock par value of one tenth of one cent ($.001) per share. The Capitalization Amendments create provisions in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, which allows the voting powers, designations, preferences and other special rights, and qualifications, limitations and restrictions of each series of preferred stock to be established from time to time by the Board without approval of the stockholders. No dividend, voting, conversion, liquidation or redemptions rights as well as redemption or sinking fund provisions are yet established with respect to the Company’s preferred stock.  On October 3, 2014, the Majority Stockholders executed and delivered to the Company a written consent approving this action.

Common Stock Issued

In  connection  with  the  convertible  note  payable  (see  Note  6  above)  the  note  holder

converted $49,000 of the principal balance to 1,539,934 shares of common stock during

the year ended December 31, 2014. The stock issued was determined based on the terms

of the convertible note.

Note 9 - Income Taxes

The Company follows Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 740, Income Taxes

(“ASC 740”) which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the

expected  future  tax  consequences  of  events  that  have  been  included  in  the  financial

statements  or  tax  returns.  Under  such  method,  deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are

recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the

financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective

tax  bases  using  enacted tax  rates  in  effect  for  the  year  in  which  the  differences  are

expected to reverse. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on

the classification of the assets and liabilities to which they relate.

F-15




The difference between income tax expense computed by applying the federal statutory

corporate tax rate and actual income tax expense is as follows:

Years Ended

December 31,

2014

2013

Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate

34.0%

34.0%

State income taxes, net of

federal income tax benefit

0.1%

0.0%

Tax effect of expenses that are not

deductible for income tax purposes

(0.8)%

1.0%

Return to Provision Items

0.0%

11.0%

Other

0.0%

0.6%

Change in Valuation Allowance

(33.3)%

(46.6)%

Effective tax rate

(0.0)%

(0.0)%

At December 31, the significant components of the deferred tax assets (liabilities) are

summarized below:

2014

2013

Deferred Tax Assets:

Net Operating Losses

$874,716

$612,173

Other

36,744

3,258

Total deferred tax assets

911,460

615,431

Deferred Tax Liabilities:

--

--

Total deferred tax liabilities

--

--

Valuation Allowance

(911,460)

(615,431)

Net deferred tax assets

$

--

$

--

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had federal and state net operating loss

carryforwards of approximately $2.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively, which expire

at various dates from 2023 through 2034. These net operating loss carry forwards may be

used to offset future taxable income and thereby reduce the Company’s U.S. federal and

state income taxes.

In accordance with ASC 740, a valuation allowance must be established if it is more

likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment is based

upon consideration of available positive and negative evidence, which includes, among

other things, the Company’s most recent results of operations and expected future

profitability. Based on the Company’s cumulative losses in recent years, a full valuation

allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012 has been

established as Management believes that the Company will not realize the benefit of

those deferred tax assets.

F-16




The Company complies with the provisions of ASC 740-10 in accounting for its

uncertain tax positions. ASC 740-10 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits

claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial

statements. Under ASC 740-10, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an

uncertain  tax  position  only if  it  is  more  likely that  not  that  the  tax  position will  be

sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the

position. Management has determined that the Company has no significant uncertain tax

positions requiring recognition under ASC 740-10.

The Company is subject to income tax in the U.S., and certain state jurisdictions. The

Company has not been audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or any states in

connection with income  taxes. The Company’s tax years generally  remain open to

examination  for  all  federal  and  state  income  tax  matters  until  its  net  operating  loss

carryforwards are  utilized and the  applicable  statutes of limitation have  expired. The

federal and state tax authorities can generally reduce a net operating loss (but not create

taxable income) for a period outside the statute of limitations in order to determine the

correct amount of net operating loss which may be allowed as a deduction against income

for a period within the statute of limitations.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, if

incurred, as a component of income tax expense.

Note 10-Retirement Plan

Gotham has adopted the Gotham Innovation Lab, Inc. SIMPLE IRA Plan, which covers

substantially all employees. Participating employees may elect to contribute, on a tax-

deferred basis, a portion of their compensation in accordance with Section 408 (a) of the

Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches up to 3% of employee contributions. The

Company's contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

were $6,630 and $14,572, respectively.

Note 11 – Concentrations and Credit Risk

Sales and Accounts Receivable

Gotham had sales to one customer which accounted for approximately 70%of Gotham’s

total  sales  for  the year  ended  December  31,  2014.The  one  customer  accounted  for

approximately 60%of accounts receivable at December 31, 2014.

Gotham had sales to two customers which accounted for approximately 45% and 24%,

respectively  of Gotham’s total sales for the year ended December 31,  2013. One

customer  accounted  for  approximately  53%  of  accounts  receivable  at  December  31,

2013.

F-17




Cash

Cash  is  maintained  at  a  major  financial  institution.  Accounts  held  at  U.S.  financial

institutions are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000. Cash balances could exceed insured

amounts at any given time, however, the Company has not experienced any such losses.

The  Company did not  have  any interest-bearing accounts at  December 31, 2014 and

2013, respectively.

Note 12 - Fair Value Measurement

The  Company adopted  the  provisions  of  Accounting Standards  Codification  subtopic

825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”) on January 1, 2008. ASC 825-10 defines

fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a

liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

When  determining  the  fair  value  measurements  for  assets  and  liabilities  required  or

permitted  to  be  recorded at  fair  value,  the  Company considers  the  principal  or  most

advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market

participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer

restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy

that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of

unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 establishes three levels of

inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar

assets  or  liabilities;  quoted  prices  in  markets  with  insufficient  volume  or  infrequent

transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant

inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable

market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the

measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

All items required to be recorded or measured on a recurring basis consist of derivative

liabilities and are based upon level 3 inputs.

To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or

unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In

certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the

fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level is the fair value

hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed and is determined based

on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Upon adoption of ASC 825-10, there was no cumulative effect adjustment to beginning

retained earnings and no impact on the financial statements.

F-18




The carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,

accounts payable, short-term borrowings (including convertible note payable), and other

current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term maturity.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have any items that would be

classified as level 1 or 2 disclosures.

The Company recognizes its derivative liabilities as level 3 and values its derivatives

using the methods discussed in Note 7. While the Company believes that its valuation

methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, it recognizes that

the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain

financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting

date. The primary assumptions that would significantly affect the fair values using the

methods discussed in Note 7 are that of volatility and market price of the underlying

common stock of the Company.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have any derivative

instruments that were designated as hedges.

The derivative liability as of December 31, 2013, in the amount of $152,076 has a level 3

classification. Further, there were no changes in fair value of the Company’s level 3

financial liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Fluctuations in the Company’s stock price are a primary driver for the changes in the

derivative valuations during each reporting period. As the stock price decreases for each

of the related derivative instruments, the value to the holder of the instrument generally

decreases, therefore decreasing the liability on the Company’s balance sheet.

Additionally, stock price volatility is one of the significant unobservable inputs used in

the fair value measurement of each of the Company’s derivative instruments. The

simulated fair value of these liabilities is sensitive to changes in the Company’s expected

volatility.  A 10% change in pricing inputs and changes in  volatilities and correlation

factors would currently not result in a material change in value for the level 3 financial

liability.

Note 13 - Related Party Transactions

Note Payable – Related Party

Gotham was provided a loan which was due on December 31, 2013 from an entity that

was previously  a related party. The balance of $6,263 has not been paid and is

accordingly included in accounts payable at December 31, 2014.

Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitment

F-19




On February 1, 2012, iGambit entered into a 5 year lease for new executive office space

in Smithtown, New York commencing on March 1, 2012 at a monthly rent of $1,500

with 2% annual increases.

Gotham has a month to month license agreement for office space that commenced on

August  2, 2012  at  a  monthly license  fee  of $4,025.    The  license  agreement  may be

terminated upon 30 days notice.

Total future minimum annual lease payments under the lease for the years ending

December 31 are as follows:

2015

$ 19,080

2016

19,440

2017

3,240

$ 41,760

Rent expense of $68,564 and $74,988 was charged to operations for the years ended

December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Contingencies

The  Company provides accruals for costs associated  with the estimated  resolution  of

contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability has been

incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated.

Litigation

Digi-Data Corporation

In connection with the asset purchase agreement discussed in Note 2, the Company filed

a  complaint  against  Digi-Data  on  October  1,  2012  for  unpaid  contingency payments

owed to the Company totaling $570,590 at December 31, 2013, exclusive of an

allowance for bad debts of $250,000. On or about December 3, 2012, Digi-Data filed its

Answer,    Affirmative    Defenses    and    Counterclaim    against    the    Company.    The

Counterclaim seeks damages against the Company for breach of the Agreement for the

alleged failure to indemnify Digi-Data for expenses related to pending litigation between

Verizon  Communications,  Inc.  (one  of Digi-Data's  customers)  and  an  unrelated  third

party, Titanide Ventures, LLC, concerning alleged patent violations (hereinafter "Verizon

Patent Litigation"). The Verizon Patent Litigation is a result of a "patent troll" whereby

Titanide seeks to extract settlement funds from alleged patent infringers without seeking

actual adjudication of its purported patent rights. The Company has advised Digi-Data of

what it believes is "prior act" related to the subject intellectual property that is at-issue in

the Verizon Patent Litigation, a possible defense to the claims by Titanide. A pre-trial

order  was  issued  by the  Court  with  detailed  deadlines  regarding among other  items,

discovery  cut-off  and  status  report deadline  date  of  April  29,  2013  and  dispositive

motions deadline date of May 28, 2013. The Company propounded its initial discovery

upon Digi-Data, responses to which were due on or about March 8, 2013. On April 4,

2013, Digi-Data provided discovery to the Company. No depositions have been

F-20




scheduled as of the date of this report, nor has the Company received any information

from Digi-data regarding any specific quantified “damages” directly resulting from this

Order or the settlement agreement between Verizon and the Plaintiff. On April 4, 2013,

an Order of Dismissal in the Verizon Patent Litigation was filed. The Dismissal is with

prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and fees.  On May 24, 2013, the Company

filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with the Court asking the Court to move in its

favor against DDC for the entire outstanding balance due along with attorney’s fees and

post and pre-judgment interest as applicable under Maryland Law. On June 11, 2013,

Digi-Data filed its Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment and, for the first time,

purported to liquidate certain alleged damages for which Digi-Data seeks a set-off against

the  amounts  admittedly  owed  by  Digi-Data  to  iGambit  and  alludes  the  existence  of

additional although not yet quantified damages.   The Response relies entirely upon the

Affidavit of a Vice President of Digi-Data for its evidentiary support. Notwithstanding,

Digi-Data failed to produce documentary support for its alleged damages and to explain

why it failed to disclose such information during the discovery period or thereafter.

On July 9, 2013, the Company filed its Reply to Digi-Data’s Response and, thereby,

advised the Court of Digi-Data’s apparent litigation-by-ambush tactic such as

withholding allegations of damages until the end of discovery and attempting to use such

previously withheld information to defeat summary judgment, and the legal inadequacy

of  same. Pursuant  to  the  Maryland  District  Court’s Local  Rules,  Digi-Data  is  not

authorized to file a Surreply without Court order.

On  December  13,  2013  the    Court  Granted  Summary  Judgment  in  the Company's  favor

against Digi-Data in the amount of $570,590, plus interest at the Maryland legal rate of

6% per annum from August 31, 2012, and post judgment interest at the Federal statutory

Rate.   Furthermore, Digi-Data’s Counterclaim was dismissed.

On February 24, 2014 the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with Digi-

Data pursuant to which     Digi-Data shall pay to the Company Six Hundred Forty-Six

Thousand, Six Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars and Sixty-Seven Cents ($646,668.67) (the

“Settlement Amount”) in full satisfaction of the Judgment.

Initial Payment: Digi-Data shall pay the Settlement Amount by delivering Twenty-Five

Thousand  Dollars and  No  Cents  ($25,000.00)  to the Company  upon the  execution  of  this

Agreement (“Initial Payment”), and delivering the remaining Six Hundred Twenty-One

Thousand, Six Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars and Sixty-Seven Cents ($621,668.67), plus

interest at a rate of 6% per annum (calculated at Actual/360) (the “Remaining Balance”)

to the Company.

Monthly Payments: Commencing thirty (30) calendar days after the Effective Date, and

continuing for the three following months, Digi-Data shall make monthly payments of

Twelve Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($12,500.00) to the Company (each, an

“Initial Monthly Payment”).   Thirty (30) calendar days after the fourth Initial Monthly

Payment is made, Digi-Data shall commence making a monthly payment of Twenty-Five

Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000.00) to the Company until the Remaining Balance is

paid in full (each, a “Subsequent Monthly Payment”).   Such Initial Monthly Payments

F-21




and Subsequent Monthly Payments shall be credited to payment of the Settlement

Amount  and Remaining Balance, with payment  being first  applied  to accrued and/or

outstanding interests, then to principal.

Line  of  Credit  Payments :    In  the  event  that  Digi-Data  obtains  a  new  line  of  credit

subsequent to the Effective Date under terms acceptable to Digi-Data in the amount of

Three Million Dollars and No Cents ($3,000,000.00) or greater it shall, within fifteen

(15)  calendar  days  upon  obtaining  such  funding,  pay the  full  Remaining  Balance  to

the Company (the “LOC Payment”). In the event that Digi-Data obtains a new line of credit

subsequent to the Effective Date under terms acceptable to Digi-Data for any amount less

than Three Million Dollars and No Cents ($3,000,000.00) that is secured by its

receivables  it  shall,  within  fifteen (15) calendar  days  of  obtaining such  funding,  pay

Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000.00) to the Company (the “Receivables

Payment”).   Such Receivables Payment shall be credited to payment of the Settlement

Amount  and Remaining Balance, with payment  being first  applied  to accrued and/or

outstanding interests, then to principal.

Digi-Data Sale : In the event of a Digi-Data Sale, iGambit shall be paid the Remaining

Balance  at  closing  of  any  such  Digi-Data  Sale  as  provided  in  paragraph  2,  below.

the Company acknowledges that, if the  Digi-Data  Sale  is a  sale  or sales of the  Digi-Data

Assets, there may be insufficient proceeds to pay the Remaining Balance in full. If the

Digi-Data Sale is a sale or sales of the stock of Digi-Data and there are insufficient

proceeds at  closing  to  pay the  Remaining  Balance  in  full, iGambit  shall  continue  to

receive the Subsequent Monthly Payment until the full Remaining Balance is paid. On

May 12,  2014, Digi-Data paid  the  full  balance  due on the  judgment  plus  all  accrued

interest upon the sale of Digi-Data.

As of December 31, 2014 the balance has been paid in full .

Financial Advisor Contract

Brooks, Houghton & Company, Inc. (BHC)

The  Company  had  entered  into  a  contract  with  BHC  in  which  BHC  would  provide

financial advisory services in connection with the Company’s proposed business

combinations and related fund raising transactions. As part of that agreement BHC would

be entitled to a “Business Combination Fee” equal to three percent of the amount of the

company’s  total  proceeds    and  other  consideration  paid  or  to  be  paid  for  the  assets

acquired, inclusive of equity or any debt issued; however the fee was to be no less than

$300,000. As a result of the IGX transaction, as described in Note 15, BHC initially felt

entitled to $300,000. The Company has taken a position that since the transaction has

been  rescinded, that  the  fee  has not  been earned and thus not to be  paid.  While  the

ultimate outcome of this matter is not presently  determinable, it is the opinion of

management that the resolution of any outstanding claim will not have a material adverse

effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

F-22




Note 15 – Rescission of Purchase Agreement for Acquisition of IGX Global Inc. and

IGX Global UK Limited

On April 8, 2013, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, IGXGLOBAL, CORP.

entered into, and became obligated under, a transaction to rescind the Company’s

purchase agreement dated December 28, 2012 (the “Purchase Agreement”) with IGX

Global Inc. (“IGXUS”), IGX Global UK Limited (“IGXUK”) and Thomas Duffy

(“DUFFY”) the sole shareholder of both IGXUK and IGXUS.

Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company intended to purchase, as of December 31,

2012, substantially all of the assets of IGXUS and all of the issued and outstanding shares

of  IGXUK  and  thereby  the  acquired  business  operated  by  IGXUS  and  IGXUK  (the

“Acquired Business”). The original agreement called for a $500,000 payment at closing,

a  $1,000,000  Promissory Note,  assumption  of  certain liabilities  of the  IGXUS  up  to

$2,500,000 and 3.75 million shares of iGambit stock to be earned over a three year period

based upon certain revenue and earnings targets. The Company had arranged financing at

the  original  effective  date  of  the  purchase  to  pay the  $500,000  payment  and  payoff

certain liabilities of IGXUS.

On April 8, 2013, under the terms of a Rescission Agreement, the Company, IGXUS,

IGXUK and Duffy (IGX), agreed to unwind the Purchase Agreement in its entirety and to

fully  restore  each  to  the  positions  they  were  respectively  prior  to  entering  into  the

Purchase Agreement. This included IGX obtaining financing to payoff the entire balance

of  the  financing the  Company had obtained to fund the upfront  payment  and certain

liabilities at the original closing date; IGX also assumed and paid certain expenses related

to the purchase. Also as consideration for iGambit’s expenses and inconvenience, the

Company received $130,000 prior to the effective date of the rescission from IGX, and

upon the effective date of the rescission, an additional payment of $275,000, and will

receive an additional $350,000 payable in equal monthly installments over 18 months.

The consideration from IGX totaling  $755,000 is reported as Other Income in the

Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. The balance due from

IGX of $225,779 was settled for $175,000, which was received on June 16, 2014. The

uncollectible balance of $50,779 was charged to operations.

F-23



TABLE OF CONTENTS