NWFL 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2012

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on April 22, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on March 18, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on April 23, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on March 15, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 25, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on March 24, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on April 26, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on March 25, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on March 26, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on March 22, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on March 23, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on March 24, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on March 23, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on March 27, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on March 21, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on March 22, 2013
DEF 14A	Filed on March 23, 2012
DEF 14A	Filed on March 21, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on March 22, 2010

10-Q 1 f10q_093012-0160.htm FORM 10-Q 9-30-12 NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP. f10q_093012-0160.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to ___________________

Commission file number 0-28366

Norwood Financial Corp.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania		23-2828306
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification no.)

717 Main Street, Honesdale, Pennsylvania		18431
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(570) 253-1455

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check (x) whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): [ ] Yes [X] No

Class		Outstanding as of November 1, 2012
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share		3,277,607

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

		Page Number
PART I -	CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	45
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	46
PART II -	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	46
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	46
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	47
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	47
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	47
Item 5.	Other Information	47
Item 6.	Exhibits	47

Signatures		49

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Balance Sheets ( unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	10,514		$	8,974
Interest bearing deposits with banks		24,825			12,449
Cash and cash equivalents		35,339			21,423

Securities available for sale, at fair value		147,639			150,263
Securities held to maturity, fair value 2012: $175, 2011: $177		172			171
Loans receivable, net of unearned income		479,501			457,907
Less: Allowance for loan losses		5,341			5,458
Net loans receivable		474,160			452,449
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at cost		2,932			3,593
Bank premises and equipment, net		7,453			7,479
Bank owned life insurance		12,234			11,887
Accrued interest receivable		2,589			2,468
Foreclosed real estate owned		659			2,910
Goodwill		9,715			9,715
Other intangibles		684			800
Other assets		5,121			5,656
TOTAL ASSETS	$	698,697		$	668,814

LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	$	89,218		$	71,959
Interest-bearing		452,372			453,808
Total deposits		541,590			525,767
Short-term borrowings		32,386			21,794
Other borrowings		27,533			27,670
Accrued interest payable		1,462			1,321
Other liabilities		3,775			4,201
TOTAL LIABILITIES		606,746			580,753

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $.10 par value per share, authorized 10,000,000; shares issued 2012: 3,371,849 shares, 2011: 3,371,866 shares		337			337
Surplus		24,728			24,660
Retained earnings		66,005			62,308
Treasury stock at cost: 2012: 94,242 shares, 2011: 87,370 shares		(2,739	)		(2,559	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,620			3,315
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		91,951			88,061
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	698,697		$	668,814

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011		2012		2011
INTEREST INCOME
Loans receivable, including fees	$	6,429		$	6,521	$	19,233	$	16,917
Securities		971			1,116		3,004		3,341
Other		9			18		20		42
Total interest income		7,409			7,655		22,257		20,300

INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		897			1,054		2,800		2,871
Short-term borrowings		14			24		38		75
Other borrowings		246			314		733		992
Total interest expense		1,157			1,392		3,571		3,938
NET INTEREST INCOME		6,252			6,263		18,686		16,362
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		900			425		1,650		1,075
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		5,352			5,838		17,036		15,287

OTHER INCOME
Service charges and fees		561			581		1,674		1,722
Income from fiduciary activities		96			106		274		324
Net realized gains on sales of securities		631			544		1,318		768
Gains on sale of loans and servicing rights		83			41		143		282
Other		220			234		679		611
Total other income		1,591			1,506		4,088		3,707

OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits		2,102			2,129		6,300		5,662
Occupancy, furniture & equipment		512			489		1,489		1,295
Data processing related		222			233		670		635
Taxes, other than income		150			142		451		414
Professional fees		157			171		583		296
Merger related expenses		-			16		18		771
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessment		94			102		290		317
Foreclosed real estate owned expense (income)		(23	)		372		184		408
Other		743			700		2,076		2,026
Total other expenses		3,957			4,354		12,061		11,824

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		2,986			2,990		9,063		7,170
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		786			775		2,419		1,811
NET INCOME	$	2,200		$	2,215	$	6,644	$	5,359

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	.67		$	.67	$	2.03	$	1.79

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	.67		$	.67	$	2.02	$	1.79

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2012			Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
Net income	$	2,200		$	2,215
Other Comprehensive Income:
Investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gains		1,331			2,021
Tax effect		(453	)		(688	)
Reclassification of gains recognized in net income		(631	)		(544	)
Tax effect		214			185
Other Comprehensive Income		461			974
Comprehensive Income	$	2,661		$	3,189

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Net income	$	6,644		$	5,359
Other Comprehensive Income:
Investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gains		1,775			3,648
Tax effect		(602	)		(1,241	)
Reclassification of gains recognized in net income		(1,318	)		(768	)
Tax effect		450			261
Other Comprehensive Income		305			1,900
Comprehensive Income	$	6,949		$	7,259

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Common Stock								Retained			Treasury Stock						Accumulated Other Comprehensive
	Shares			Amount		Surplus			Earnings			Shares			Amount			Income		Total
Balance December 31, 2011		3,371,866		$	337	$	24,660		$	62,308			87,370		$	(2,559	)	$	3,315	$	88,061
Net Income										6,644											6,644
Other comprehensive income																			305		305
Cash dividends declared $.90 per share										(2,947	)										(2,947	)
Acquisition of treasury stock													11,647			(320	)				(320	)
Compensation expense related to stock o ptions							98														98
Stock options exercised							(41	)					(4,775	)		140					99
Tax benefit on stock options							11														11
North Penn exchange adjustment	(17		)									_____			______			_____		___
Balance, September 30, 2012		3,371,849		$	337	$	24,728		$	66,005			94,242		$	(2,739	)	$	3,620	$	91,951

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)	Nine Months Ended Sptember 30,
	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income	$	6,644		$	5,359
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		1,650			1,075
Depreciation		420			369
Amortization of intangible assets		116			68
Deferred income taxes		(404	)		(31	)
Net amortization of securities premiums and discounts		888			564
Net realized gain on sales of securities		(1,318	)		(768	)
Net increase in value of life insurance		(395	)		(299	)
Loss (gain) on sale of foreclosed real estate		(24	)		54
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		(163	)		(282	)
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(4,343	)		(8,677	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans originated for sale		4,506			8,959
Compensation expense related to stock options		98			126
Decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets		1,434			2,049
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(281	)		675
Net cash provided by operating activities		8,828			9,241

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Securities available for sale:
Proceeds from sales		23,265			27,734
Proceeds from maturities and principal reductions on mortgage-backed securities		25,251			23,180
Purchases		(45,780	)		(35,043	)
Redemption of FHLB stock		661			527
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(24,261	)		15,975
Purchase of bank premises and equipment		(394	)		(135	)
Proceeds from sale of bank premises and equipment and foreclosed real estate		3,229			346
Acquisition, net of cash acquired		-			4,544
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(18,029	)		37,128

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		15,823			(2,786	)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		10,592			(1,333	)
Repayments of other borrowings		(137	)		(18,060	)
Stock options exercised		99			-
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		11			-
Acquisition of treasury stock		(320	)		(207	)
Cash dividends paid		(2,951	)		(2,559	)
Net cash provided by (used in)financing activities		23,117			(24,945	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		13,916			21,424

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		21,423			16,625
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	35,339		$	38,049

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(dollars in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash payments for:
Interest paid to depositors and borrowers	$	3,430		$	3,985
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	1,408		$	1,409
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing Activities
Investment purchases	$	(774	)	$	-
Transfers of loans to foreclosed real estate and repossession of other assets	$	954		$	3,051

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Norwood Financial Corp. (Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Wayne Bank (Bank) and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, WCB Realty Corp., Norwood Investment Corp., Norwood Settlement Services, LLC, and WTRO Properties. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the Company. The operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012 or any other future interim period.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes which are incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2011.

2. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the weighted average shares outstanding used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share:

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Basic EPS weighted average shares outstanding		3,278		3,292		3,279		3,001
Dilutive effect of stock options		8		1		5		1
Diluted EPS weighted average shares outstanding		3,286		3,293		3,284		3,002

Stock options which had no intrinsic value, because their effect would be anti-dilutive and therefore were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation were 60,000 and 165,150 as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, based upon the closing price of Norwood common stock of $30.20 and $24.02 per share on September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

3. Stock-Based Compensation

As of September 30, 2012, there was $33,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options granted in 2011 under the plan, which will be fully amortized by December 31, 2012.

A summary of stock options from all plans, adjusted for stock dividends declared, is shown below.

	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)

Outstanding at January 1, 2012	209,914		$	28.43	6.3	Yrs.	$	113
Granted	-			-		-		-
Exercised	(4,775	)		20.72	.8	Yrs.		31
Forfeited	(12,225	)		29.65	5.2	Yrs.		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2012	192,914			28.54	5.7	Yrs.		370

Exercisable at September 30, 2012	164,914			28.72	5.0	Yrs.		293

Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the market price of the stock on the measurement date exceeded the exercise price of the option. The stock price was $30.20 as of September 30, 2012 and $27.47 as of December 31, 2011.

4. Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments and Guarantees

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

A summary of the Bank’s financial instrument commitments is as follows:

(in thousands)	September 30,
	2012		2011
Unfunded availability under loan commitments	$	38,297	$	37,649
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit		37,081		31,183
Standby letters of credit		11,277		11,960

	$	86,655	$	80,792

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of

collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer and generally consists of real estate.

The Bank does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank, generally, holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of September 30, 2012 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.

5. Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities were as follows:

	September 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agencies	$	6,999	$	43	$	-		$	7,042
States and political subdivisions		55,445		3,249		(2	)		58,692
Corporate obligations		9,041		341		-			9,382
Mortgage -backed securities- government sponsored entities		70,292		1,869		(39	)		72,122
		141,777		5,502		(41	)		147,238
Equity securities-financial services		374		27		-			401
	$	142,151	$	5,529	$	(41	)	$	147,639
Held to Maturity:
States and political subdivisions	$	172	$	3	$	-		$	175

	December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agencies	$	13,268	$	130	$	-		$	13,398
States and political subdivisions		54,106		2,640		-			56,746
Corporate obligations		8,733		130		(54	)		8,809
Mortgage-backed securities-government sponsored entities		68,886		2,081		(2	)		70,965
		144,993		4,981		(56	)		149,918
Equity securities-financial services		239		109		(3	)		345
	$	145,232	$	5,090	$	(59	)	$	150,263
Held to Maturity:
States and political subdivisions	$	171	$	6	$	-		$	177

The following tables show the Company’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value aggregated by length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
States and political subdivisions	$	2,161	$	(2	)	$	-	$	-	$	2,161	$	(2	)
Mortgage-backed securities-government sponsored agencies		13,062		(39	)		-		-		13,062		(39	)
	$	15,223	$	(41	)	$	-	$	-	$	15,223	$	(41	)

	December 31, 2011
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Corporate obligations	$	4,152	$	(54	)	$	-	$	-		$	4,152	$	(54	)
Mortgage-backed securities-government sponsored agencies		2,495		(2	)		-		-			2,495		(2	)
Equity securities-financial services		34		(2	)		15		(1	)		49		(3	)
	$	6,681	$	(58	)	$	15	$	(1	)	$	6,696	$	(59	)

At September 30, 2012, the Company has 14 debt securities in an unrealized loss position in the less than twelve months category and no debt securities in the twelve months or more category. In Management’s opinion the unrealized losses less than twelve months principally reflect changes in interest rates subsequent to

the acquisition of specific securities. The Company holds a small amount of equity securities in other financial institutions. As of September 30, 2012, there were no unrealized losses on equity securities. Management believes that the unrealized loss represents temporary impairment of the securities as the Company does not have the intent to sell the security and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the securities before recovery of their cost basis.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities as of September 30, 2012 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)

Due in one year or less	$	7,586	$	7,676	$	-	$	-
Due after one year through five years		12,691		12,996		172		175
Due after five years through ten years		21,165		22,223		-		-
Due after ten years		30,043		32,221		-		-

Mortgage-backed securities-government sponsored agencies		70,292		72,122		-		-
	$	141,777	$	147,238	$	172	$	175

Gross realized gains and gross realized losses on sales of securities available for sale were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months					Nine Months
	Ended September 30,					Ended September 30,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
G ross realized gains	$	631	$	548		$	1,318	$	776
Gross realized losses	-			(4	)	-			(8	)
Net realized gain	$	631	$	544		$	1,318	$	768
Proceeds from sales of securities	$	15,549	$	17,390		$	23,265	$	27,734

6. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses

Set forth below is selected data relating to the composition of the loan portfolio at the dates indicated:

	Types of loans (dollars in thousands)


	September 30, 2012					December 31,

Real Estate-Residential	$	148,056		30.9	%		$	148,148		32.3	%
Commercial		274,081		57.1				262,476		57.3
Construction		14,819		3.1				11,087		2.4
Commercial, financial and agricultural		28,528		5.9				22,684		5.0
Consumer loans to individuals		14,515		3.0				13,934		3.0
Total loans		479,999		100.0	%			458,329		100.0	%

Deferred fees (net)		(498	)					(422	)

Allowance for loan losses		(5,341	)					(5,458	)
Net loans receivable	$	474,160					$	452,449

Changes in the accretable yield for purchased credit-impaired loans were as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 (in thousands):

Balance at beginning of period	$	171
Accretion		(71	)
Reclassification and other		-
Balance at end of period	$	100

The following table presents additional information regarding loans acquired and accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30 (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	Acquired Loans with Specific Evidence of Deterioration in Credit Quality	Acquired Loans with Specific Evidence of Deterioration in Credit Quality
Outstanding Balance	$1,328	$ 1,412
Carrying Amount	1,228	1,246

There were no material increases or decreases in the expected cash flows of these loans between May 31, 2011 (the “acquisition date”) and September 30, 2012.

The Company maintains a loan review system, which provides for a periodic review of our loan portfolio and the early identification of potential impaired loans. Such system takes into consideration, among other things, delinquency status, size of loans, type and market value of collateral and financial condition of the borrowers. Specific loan loss allowances are established for identified losses based on a review of such information. A loan evaluated for impairment is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of

the loan agreement. All loans identified as impaired are evaluated independently. We do not aggregate such loans for evaluation purposes. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential mortgage loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are part of a larger relationship that is impaired, or are classified as a troubled debt restructuring.

The following table shows the amount of loans in each category that were individually and collectively evaluated for impairment at the dates indicated:

	Real Estate
	Residential		Commercial		Construction		Commercial Loans		Consumer Loans		Total
September 30, 2012	(In thousands)

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	11,157	$	-	$	237	$	-	$	11,394
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		271		957		-		-		-		1,228
Collectively evaluated for impairment		147,785		261,967		14,819		28,291		14,515		467,377

Total loans	$	148,056	$	274,081	$	14,819	$	28,528	$	14,515	$	479,999

	Rreal Estate
	Residential		Commercial		Construction		Commercial Loans		Consumer Loans		Total
December 31, 2011	(In thousands)

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	11,786	$	-	$	598	$	-	$	12,384
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		343		903		-		-		-		1,246
Collectively evaluated for impairment		147,805		249,787		11,087		22,086		13,934		444,699
Total Loans	$	148,148	$	262,476	$	11,087	$	22,684	$	13,934	$	458,329

The following table includes the recorded investment and unpaid principal balances for impaired loans with the associated allowance amount, if applicable.

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Associated Allowance
September 30, 2012 With no related allowance recorded:	(In thousands)
Real Estate Loans
Residential	$	271	$	291	$	-
Commercial		5,585		5,665		-
Commercial Loans		237		237		-
Total		6,093		6,193		-
With an allowance recorded:
Real Estate Loans
Commercial		6,529		6,529		89
Total		6,529		6,529		89
Total:
Real Estate loans
Residential		271		291		-
Commercial		12,114		12,194		89
Commercial Loans		237		237		-
Total Impaired Loans	$	12,622	$	12,722	$	89

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Associated Allowance
December 31, 2011 With no related allowance recorded:	(In thousands)
Real Estate Loans
Residential	$	343	$	385	$	-
Commercial		5,866		5,995		-
Commercial Loans		598		598		-
Total		6,807		6,978		-
With an allowance recorded:
Real Estate Loans
Commercial		6,823		6,823		1,231
Total		6,823		6,823		1,231
Total:
Real Estate loans
Residential		343		385		-
Commercial		12,689		12,818		1,231
Commercial Loans		598		598		-
Total Impaired Loans	$	13,630	$	13,801	$	1,231

The following information for impaired loans is presented for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Average Recorded Investment				Interest Income Recognized
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Total:	(In thousands)
Real Estate loans
Residential	$	284		-	$	4	$	-
Commercial		12,937	$	15,454		206		320
Commercial Loans		401		395		-		60
Total Loans	$	13,622	$	15,849	$	210	$	380

The following information for impaired loans is presented for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Average Recorded Investment				Interest Income Recognized
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Total:	(In thousands)
Real Estate loans
Residential	$	272		-	$	2	$	-
Commercial		12,783	$	15,426		60		145
Commercial Loans		311		392		-		10
Total Loans	$	13,366	$	15,818	$	62	$	155

Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of financial difficulties experienced by the borrower, who could not obtain comparable terms from alternate financing sources. As of September 30, 2012, troubled debt restructured loans totaled $6.1 million and resulted in specific reserves of $78,000. During the quarter ending September 30, 2012, one loan with a balance of $6.5 million was written down by $1.0 million to $5.5 million as a result of the borrower’s inability to make the modified payments. The write-down was based on the estimated realizable value of the real estate collateral. During 2012 and 2011, there were no new loans identified as troubled debt restructurings. As of December 31, 2011, troubled debt restructured loans totaled $7.2 million and resulted in specific reserves of $1.2 million.

Management uses a seven point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first three categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due are considered Substandard. Any portion of a loan that has been charged off is placed in the Loss category.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Bank has a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as non performance, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. The Bank’s Loan Review Department is responsible for the timely and accurate risk rating of the loans on an ongoing basis. Every credit which must be approved by Loan Committee or the Board of Directors is assigned a risk rating at time of consideration. Loan Review also annually reviews relationships of $500,000 and over to assign or re-affirm risk ratings. Loans in the Substandard categories that are collectively evaluated for impairment are given separate consideration in the determination of the allowance.

The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate Pass and the criticized categories of Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss within the internal risk rating system as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
September 30, 2012
Commercial real estate loans	$	247,475	$	13,376	$	13,230	$	-	$	274,081
Commercial loans		27,930		320		278		-		28,528
Total	$	275,405	$	13,696	$	13,508	$	-	$	302,609

	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
December 31, 2011
Commercial real estate loans	$	237,407	$	11,009	$	14,060	$	-	$	262,476
Commercial loans		21,598		427		659		-		22,684
Total	$	259,005	$	11,436	$	14,719	$	-	$	285,160

For residential real estate loans, construction loans and consumer loans, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the performance of the individual credits. Nonperforming loans include loans on nonaccrual status and accruing loans which are past due over ninety days. The following table presents the recorded investment in the loan classes based on payment activity as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

September 30, 2012	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
Residential real estate loans	$	145,683	$	2,373	$	148,056
Construction		14,819		-		14,819
Consumer loans		14,515		-		14,515
Total	$	175,017	$	2,373	$	177,390

December 31, 2011	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
Residential real estate loans	$	145,061	$	3,087	$	148,148
Construction		11,087		-		11,087
Consumer loans		13,934		-		13,934
Total	$	170,082	$	3,087	$	173,169

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Current		31-60 Days Past Due		61-90 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due and still accruing		Non- Accrual		Total Past Due and Non- Accrual		Total Loans
September 30, 2012
Real Estate loans
Residential	$	144,724	$	831	$	128	$	-	$	2,373	$	3,332	$	148,056
Commercial		260,555		1,364		991		67		11,104		13,526		274,081
Construction		14,799		20		-		-		-		20		14,819
Commercial loans		28,278		13		-		-		237		250		28,528
Consumer loans		14,457		53		5		-		-		58		14,515
Total	$	462,813	$	2,281	$	1,124	$	67	$	13,714	$	17,186	$	479,999

	Current		31-60 Days Past Due		61-90 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due and still accruing		Non- Accrual		Total Past Due and Non- Accrual		Total Loans
December 31, 2011
Real Estate loans
Residential	$	143,550	$	160	$	1,351	$	-	$	3,087	$	4,598	$	148,148
Commercial		255,613		1,015		1,524		-		4,324		6,863		262,476
Construction		10,532		-		555		-		-		555		11,087
Commercial loans		22,086		194		-		-		404		598		22,684
Consumer loans		13,835		89		10		-		-		99		13,934
Total	$	445,616	$	1,458	$	3,440	$	-	$	7,815	$	12,713	$	458,329

The following table presents the allowance for loan losses by the classes of the loan portfolio:

(In thousands)	Residential Real Estate			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
Beginning balance, December 31, 2011	$	1,257		$	3,838		$	72		$	147		$	144		$	5,458
Charge Offs		(402	)		(1,316	)		(7	)		(23	)		(46	)		(1,794	)
Recoveries		6			1			-			-			20			27
Provision Expense		836			594			10			158			52			1,650
Ending balance, September 30, 2012	$	1,697		$	3,117		$	75		$	282		$	170		$	5,341
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	-		$	89			-			-			-		$	89
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,697		$	3,028		$	75		$	282		$	170		$	5,252

(In thousands)	Residential Real Estate			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
Beginning balance, June 30, 2012	$	1,559		$	3,691		$	87		$	263		$	175		$	5,775
Charge Offs		(94	)		(1,220	)		-			(23	)		(13	)		(1,350	) )
Recoveries		5			1			-			-			10			16
Provision Expense		227			645			(12	)		42			(2	)		900
Ending balance, September 30, 2012	$	1,697		$	3,117		$	75		$	282		$	170		$	5,341

(In thousands)	Residential Real Estate			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
Beginning balance, December 31, 2010	$	1,167		$	3,976		$	110		$	171		$	192		$	5,616
Charge Offs		(372	)		(963	)		-			(2	)		(80	)		(1,417	)
Recoveries		25			-			-			5			41			71
Provision Expense		333			782			(29	)		(20	)		9			1,075
Ending balance, September 30, 2011	$	1,153		$	3,795		$	81		$	154		$	162		$	5,345
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	-		$	1,322			-			-			-		$	1,322
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,153		$	2,473		$	81		$	154		$	162		$	4,023

(In thousands)	Residential Real Estate			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
Beginning balance, June 30, 2011	$	1,096		$	3,675		$	91		$	258		$	147		$	5,267
Charge Offs		(146	)		(199	)		-			-			(39	)		(384	)
Recoveries		18			-			-			-			19			37
Provision Expense		185			319			(10	)		(104	)		35			425
Ending balance, September 30, 2011	$	1,153		$	3,795		$	81		$	154		$	162		$	5,345

The Company’s primary business activity is with customers located in northeastern Pennsylvania. Accordingly, the Company has extended credit primarily to commercial entities and individuals in this area whose ability to honor their contracts is influenced by the region’s economy.

As of September 30, 2012, the Company considered its concentration of credit risk to be acceptable. The highest concentrations are in the hospitality lodging industry and property owners associations with loans outstanding of $46.4 million, or 51.6% of capital, to the hospitality lodging industry and $10.3 million, or 15.6% of capital, to property owners associations. There were no losses recognized on loans to the hospitality industry or to property owners associations during the current period.

Gross realized gains and gross realized losses on sales of residential mortgage loans were $163,000 and $0 respectively, in the first nine months of 2012 compared to $240,000 and $21,000, respectively, in the same period in 2011. The proceeds from the sales of residential mortgage loans totaled $4.5 million and $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, gross realized gains and gross realized losses on sales of residential mortgage loans were $88,000 and $0 respectively, compared to $81,000 and $21,000, respectively in the same three month period of 2011. The proceeds from the sales of residential mortgage loans totaled $2.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

7. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value estimates are based on quoted market prices, if available, quoted market prices of similar assets or liabilities, or the present value of expected future cash flows and other valuation techniques. These valuations are significantly affected by discount rates, cash flow assumptions and risk assumptions used. Therefore, fair value estimates may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not intended to reflect the proceeds that may be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instruments.

Fair value is determined at one point in time and is not representative of future value. These amounts do not reflect the total value of a going concern organization. Management does not have the intention to dispose of a significant portion of its assets and liabilities and therefore, the unrealized gains or losses should not be interpreted as a forecast of future earnings and cash flows.

The following is a discussion of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and valuation techniques applied:

Securities:

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level 2). Internal cash flow models using a present value formula that includes assumptions market participants would use along with indicative exit pricing obtained from broker/dealers (where available) are used to support fair values of certain (Level 3) investments, if applicable.

We may be required from time to time to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Impaired loans (carried at fair value):

The Company measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

Foreclosed real estate owned (carried at fair value):

Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of loan foreclosure are to be sold and are carried at fair value less estimated cost to sell. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised value of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. These assets are included in Level 3 fair value based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	Fair Value Measurement Using
Description	Total			(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

September 30, 2012	(In thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agencies		$	7,042	$	-	$	7,042	$	-
States and political subdivisions			58,692		-		58,692		-
Corporate obligations			9,382		-		9,382		-
Mortgage-backed securities-government sponsored agencies			72,122		-		72,122		-
Equity securities-financial services			401		401		-	-
Total		$	147,639	$	401	$	147,238	$	-

December 31, 2011
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agencies		$	13,398	$	-	$	13,398	$	-
States and political subdivisions			56,746		-		56,746		-
Corporate obligations			8,809		-		8,809		-
Mortgage-backed securities-government sponsored agencies			70,965		-		70,965		-
Equity securities-financial services			345		345	-		-
Total		$	150,263	$	345	$	149,918	$	-

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

			Fair Value Measurement using

(In thousands)


Description	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
September 30, 2012
Impaired Loans	$	12,533	$	-	$	-	$	12,533
Foreclosed Real Estate Owned		659		-		-		659
	$	13,192	$	-	$	-	$	13,192

December 31, 2011
Impaired Loans	$	12,399	$	-	$	-	$	12,399
Foreclosed Real Estate Owned		2,910		-		-		2,910
	$	15,309	$	-	$	-	$	15,309

There were no assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value at September 30, 2012.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Norwood has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
(In thousands)	Fair Value Estimate	Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range(Weighted Average)
September 30, 2012
Impaired loans	$12,533	Appraisal of collateral(1)	Appraisal adjustments(2)	10-30% (24.05%)
Foreclosed real estate owned	$659	Appraisal of collateral(1)(3)	Liquidation expenses(2)	20%

(1)	Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various level 3 inputs which are not identifiable, less any associated allowance.
(2)	Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.
(3)	Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses.

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Cash and cash equivalents (carried at cost):

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

Loans receivable (carried at cost):

The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of impaired loans are generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral.

Mortgage servicing rights (generally carried at cost)

The Company utilizes a third party provider to estimate the fair value of certain loan servicing rights. Fair value for the purpose of this measurement is defined as the amount at which the asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation.

Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock (carried at cost):

The Company as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. This restricted stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost.

Bank owned life insurance (carried at cost):

The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the Bank-owned life insurance.

Accrued interest receivable and payable (carried at cost):

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Deposit liabilities (carried at cost):

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g. interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Short-term borrowings (carried at cost):

The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.

Other borrowings (carried at cost ):

Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments (disclosed at cost):

Fair values for the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments were as follows at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. (In thousands)

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2012
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold	$	35,339	$	35,339	$	35,339	$	-	$	-
Securities		147,811		147,814		401		147,413		-
Loans receivable, net		474,160		485,255		-		-		485, 255
Mortgage servicing rights		283		283		-		-		283
Investment in FHLB stock		2,932		2,932		2,932		-		-
Bank owned life insurance		12,234		12,234		12,234		-		-
Accrued interest receivable		2,589		2,589		2,589		-		-

Financial liabilities:
Deposits		541,590		543,356		330,734		-		212,622
Short-term borrowings		32,386		32,386		32,386		-		-
Other borrowings		27,533		30,780		-		-		30,780
Accrued interest payable		1,462		1,462		1,462		-		-

Off-balance sheet financial instruments: Commitments to extend credit and outstanding letters of credit		-		-		-		-		-

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks, interest- bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold	$	21,423	$	21,423
Securities		150,434		150,440
Loans receivable, net		452,449		463,118
Mortgage servicing rights		302		308
Investment in FHLB stock		3,593		3,593
Bank owned life insurance		11,887		11,887
Accrued interest receivable		2,468		2,468

Financial liabilities:
Deposits		525,767		527,707
Short-term borrowings		21,794		21,794
Other borrowings		27,670		30,002
Accrued interest payable		1,321		1,321

Off-balance sheet financial instruments: Commitments to extend credit and outstanding letters of credit		-		-

8. New and Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification. The amendments in this Update affect entities that cease to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary's nonrecourse debt. Under the amendments in this Update, when a parent (reporting entity) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary's nonrecourse debt, the reporting entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 360-20 to determine whether it should derecognize the in substance real estate. Generally, a reporting entity would not satisfy the requirements to derecognize the in substance real estate before the legal transfer of the real estate to the lender and the extinguishment of the related nonrecourse indebtedness. That is, even if the reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest under Subtopic 810-10, the reporting entity would continue to include the real estate, debt, and the results of the subsidiary's operations in its consolidated financial statements until legal title to the real estate is transferred to legally satisfy the debt. The amendments in this Update should be applied on a prospective basis to deconsolidation events occurring after the effective date. Prior periods should not be adjusted even if the reporting entity has continuing involvement with previously derecognized in substance real estate entities. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities . The amendments in this Update affect all entities that have financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The requirements amend the disclosure requirements on offsetting in Section 210-20-50. This information will enable users of an entity's financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity's financial position, including the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with certain financial instruments and derivative instruments in the scope of this Update. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains safe harbor provisions regarding forward-looking statements. When used in this discussion, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “contemplates,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Those risks and uncertainties are as follows:

	•	our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from our acquisition of North Penn Bancorp, Inc.
	•	our ability to effectively manage future growth
	•	loan losses in excess of our allowance
	•	risks inherent in commercial lending
	•	real estate collateral which is subject to declines in value
	•	potential other-than-temporary impairments
	•	higher deposit insurance premiums
	•	soundness of other financial institutions
	•	increased compliance burden under new financial reform legislation
	•	risk of failure to stabilize the financial system
	•	current market volatility
	•	potential liquidity risk
	•	availability of capital
	•	regional economic factors
	•	loss of senior officers
	•	comparatively low legal lending limits
	•	limited market for the Company’s stock
	•	restrictions on ability to pay dividends
	•	common stock may lose value
	•	competitive environment
	•	issuing additional shares may dilute ownership
	•	extensive and complex governmental regulation and associated cost
	•	interest rate risks

Norwood Financial Corp. undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to those forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Policies

Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 (incorporated by reference in Item 8 of the Form 10-K) lists significant accounting policies used in the development and presentation of its financial statements. This discussion and analysis, the significant accounting policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other qualitative and quantitative factors that are necessary for an understanding and evaluation of the Company and its results of operations.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, potential impairment of restricted stock, accounting for stock options, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the fair value of financial instruments, valuation of impaired loans, and the determination of other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities. Please refer to the discussion of the allowance for loan losses calculation under “Allowance for Loan Losses and Non-performing Assets” in the “Changes in Financial Condition” section.

The Company uses the modified prospective transition method to account for stock based compensation. Under this method companies are required to record compensation expense, based on the fair value of options over the vesting period.

Deferred income taxes reflect temporary differences in the recognition of the revenue and expenses for tax reporting and financial statement purposes, principally because certain items are recognized in different periods for financial reporting and tax return purposes. Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that all deferred tax assets will be realized.

Bonds, notes and debentures for which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at cost, adjusted for premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the term of the security.

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each Consolidated Balance Sheet date.

Declines in the fair value of held to maturity and available for sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent of the Company to not sell the securities and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the securities before recovery of their cost basis.

The Company, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. This restricted stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost.

The FHLB incurred losses in both 2009 and 2010 and had suspended the payment of dividends. However, the FHLB has shown positive results during 2011 and 2012 which includes stock redemptions and resumed dividend payments. The losses were primarily attributable to impairment of investment securities associated with the extreme economic conditions in place during the previous several years. Management evaluated the stock and concluded that the stock was not impaired for the periods presented herein. More consideration was given to the long-term prospects for the FHLB as opposed to the recent stress caused by the extreme economic conditions the world is facing. Management also considered that the FHLB’s regulatory

capital ratios have increased from the prior year, liquidity appears adequate, and the new shares of FHLB stock continue to change hands at the $100 par value.

Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment. Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary decline in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB. Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the restricted stock as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities, the Company considers 1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, 2) the financial condition of the issuer, and 3) the intent and ability of the Company to hold the security to allow for a recovery to fair value. The Company believes that the unrealized loss on all other securities at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 represents temporary impairment of the securities, related to changes in interest rates.

In connection with the acquisition of North Penn, we recorded goodwill in the amount of $9.7 million, representing the excess of amounts paid over the fair value of net assets of the institutions acquired in purchase transactions, at its fair value at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is tested and deemed impaired when the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company performed an assessment of key factors as of May 31, 2012 and determined that impairment of goodwill was not likely. The value of the goodwill can change in the future. We expect the value of the goodwill to decrease if there is a significant decrease in the franchise value of the Bank. If an impairment loss is determined in the future, we will reflect the loss as an expense for the period in which the impairment is determined, leading to a reduction of our net income for that period by the amount of the impairment loss.

Changes in Financial Condition

General

Total assets as of September 30, 2012 were $698.7 million compared to $668.8 million as of December 31, 2011, an increase of $29.9 million. The increase includes $21.6 million of loan growth which was funded with an $15.8 million increase in deposits and a $10.6 million increase in short-term borrowings in the form of repurchase agreements.

Securities

The fair value of securities available for sale as of September 30, 2012 was $147.6 million compared to $150.3 million as of December 31, 2011. The Company purchased $45.8 million of securities principally using the proceeds from $48.5 million of securities sold, called, maturities and principal reductions.

The carrying value of the Company’s securities portfolio (Available-for Sale and Held-to Maturity) consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2012					December 31, 2011
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of portfolio			Amount		% of portfolio

U.S. Government agencies	$	7,042		4.8	%	$	13,398		8.9	%
States and political subdivisions		58,864		39.8			56,917		37.8
Corporate obligations		9,382		6.3			8,809		5.9
Mortgage-backed securities- government sponsored entities		72,122		48.8			70,965		47.2
Equity securities-financial services		401		0.3			345		0.2
Total	$	147,811		100.0	%	$	150,434		100.0	%

The Company has securities in an unrealized loss position. In management’s opinion, the unrealized losses reflect changes in interest rates subsequent to the acquisition of specific securities. Management believes that the unrealized losses represent temporary impairment of the securities, as the Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until maturity or market price recovery.

Loans

Loans receivable totaled $479.5 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $457.9 million as of December 31, 2011. The majority of the growth recorded in 2012 was centered in commercial loans. Commercial real estate loans increased $11.6 million during the period while other commercial loans increased $5.8 million.

The allowance for loan losses totaled $5,341,000 as of September 30, 2012 and represented 1.11% of total loans, compared to $5,458,000 at December 31, 2011, and $5,345,000 as of September 30, 2011. The Company had net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 of $1,767,000 compared to $1,346,000 in the comparable period in 2011. The Company’s loan review process assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. The process includes an analysis of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio. It includes an analysis of impaired loans and a historical review of credit losses by loan type. Other factors considered include: concentration of credit in specific industries; economic and industry conditions; trends in delinquencies and loan classifications, large dollar exposures and loan growth. Management considers the allowance adequate at September 30, 2012 based on the Company’s criteria. However, there can be no assurance that the allowance for loan losses will be adequate to cover significant losses, if any, that might be incurred in the future.

As of September 30, 2012, non-performing loans totaled $13.8 million, which is 2.87% of total loans compared to $7,815,000, or 1.71% of total loans at December 31, 2011. During the three month period ended September 30, 2012, one large commercial relationship in the amount of $6.5 million was transferred to nonaccrual status based on the borrower’s inability to make scheduled payments. Subsequent to the transfer, a $1.0 million write-down was processed based on the estimated realizable value of the collateral.

The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate at the dates indicated:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis:
Commercial and all other	$	237		$	404
Real Estate		13,477			7,411
Total		13,714			7,815

Accruing loans which are contractually
past due 90 days or more		67			-
Total non-performing loans		13,781			7,815
Foreclosed real estate		659			2,910
Total non-performing assets	$	14,440		$	10,725
Allowance for loans losses	$	5,341		$	5,458
Coverage of non-performing loans		.39	x		.70	x
Non-performing loans to total loans		2.87	%		1.71	%
Non-performing loans to total assets		1.97	%		1.17	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		2.07	%		1.60	%

Deposits

During the nine month period ending September 30, 2012, total deposits increased $15.8 million which includes growth of $17.3 million in non-interest bearing demand deposits and a $14.2 million increase in money market accounts. Certificates of deposit decreased $10.9 million due primarily to the seasonality of municipal deposits while NOW account balances decreased due to fluctuations in municipal accounts.

The following table sets forth deposit balances as of the dates indicated:

(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011

Non-interest bearing demand	$	89,218	$	71,959
Interest bearing demand		46,627		51,161
Money market deposit accounts		128,183		114,007
Savings		66,706		66,866
Time deposits <$100,000		143,493		141,220
Time deposits >$100,000		67,363		80,554

Total	$	541,590	$	525,767

Borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which totaled $32.4 million on September 30, 2012 and $21.8 million on December 31, 2011. The increase of $10.6 million reflects the seasonality of the accounts.

Other borrowings consisted of the following:

(dollars in thousands)
	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Notes with the FHLB:
Convertible note due October 2012 at 4.37%	$	5,000	$	5,000
Convertible note due May 2013 at 3.015%		5,000		5,000
Fixed rate note due July 2015 at 4.34%		7,533		7,670
Convertible note due January 2017 at 4.71%		10,000		10,000
	$	27,533	$	27,670

The convertible notes contain an option which allows the FHLB, at quarterly intervals to change the note to an adjustable-rate advance at three month LIBOR plus 11 to 19 basis points. If the notes are converted, the option allows the Bank to put the funds back to the FHLB at no charge. The fixed rate borrowing due July 2015 includes a $533,000 fair value adjustment net of amortization, which was recorded at the time of the North Penn acquisition.

Stockholders’ Equity and Capital Ratios

As of September 30, 2012, stockholders’ equity totaled $92.0 million, compared to $88.1 million as of December 31, 2011. The net change in stockholders’ equity included $6.6 million of net income, that was partially offset by $2.9 million of dividends declared. In addition, accumulated other comprehensive income increased $305,000 due to an increase in fair value of securities in the available for sale portfolio, net of tax. This increase in fair value is the result of a change in interest rates and spreads, which may impact the value of the securities. Because of interest rate volatility, the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income could materially fluctuate for each interim and year-end period.

A comparison of the Company’s regulatory capital ratios is as follows:

September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011

Tier 1 Capital

(To average assets) 11.61% 11.29%

Tier 1 Capital

(To risk-weighted assets) 15.88% 15.86%

Total Capital

(To risk-weighted assets) 16.97% 17.04%

The minimum capital requirements imposed by the FDIC on the Bank for leverage, Tier 1 and Total Capital are 4%, 4% and 8%, respectively. The Company has similar capital requirements imposed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). The Bank is also subject to more stringent Pennsylvania Department of Banking (PDB) guidelines. The Bank’s capital ratios do not differ significantly from the Company’s ratios. Although not adopted in regulation form, the PDB utilizes capital standards requiring a minimum of 6.5% leverage capital and 10% total capital. The Company and the Bank were in compliance with applicable FRB, FDIC and PDB capital requirements as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Liquidity

As of September 30, 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $35.3 million in the form of cash, due from banks and short-term deposits with other institutions. In addition, the Company had total securities available for sale of $147.6 million which could be used for liquidity needs. This totals $182.9 million and represents 26.2% of total assets compared to $171.7 million and 25.7% of total assets as of December 31, 2011. The Company also monitors other liquidity measures, all of which were within the Company’s policy guidelines as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Based upon these measures, the Company believes its liquidity is adequate.

Capital Resources

The Company has a line of credit commitment available from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Pittsburgh for borrowings of up to $20,000,000 which expires in December 2016. There were no borrowings under this line at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The Company has a line of credit commitment from Atlantic Central Bankers Bank for $7,000,000 which expires June 30, 2013. There were no borrowings under this line as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The Company has a line of credit commitment available which has no stated expiration date from PNC Bank for $16,000,000. There were no borrowings as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The Bank’s maximum borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank was approximately $260,000,000 as of September 30, 2012, of which $27,000,000 was outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are secured by qualifying assets of the Bank.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This report contains or references fully taxable-equivalent (fte) interest income and net interest income, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Interest income (fte) and net interest income (fte) are derived from GAAP interest income and net interest income using an assumed tax rate of 34%. We believe the presentation of interest income (fte) and net interest income (fte) ensures comparability of interest income and net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practice. Net interest income (fte) is reconciled to GAAP net interest income on page 37 and 41. Although the Company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors’ understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP measures.

Results of Operations

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Average Balance Sheets with Resultant Interest and Rates

(Tax-Equivalent Basis, dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012									2011
	Average Balance (2)			Interest (1)			Average Rate (3)			Average Balance (2)			Interest (1)			Average Rate (3)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold	$	-		$	-			0.00	%	$	1,416		$	-			0.04	%
Interest bearing deposits with banks		15,212			9			0.24			26,627			18			0.27
Securities held-to-maturity		172			2			4.65			170			3			7.06
Securities available for sale:
Taxable		93,289			479			2.05			94,973			626			2.64
Tax-exempt (1)		54,664			742			5.43			52,824			740			5.60
Total securities available for sale (1)		147,953			1,221			3.30			147,797			1,366			3.70
Loans receivable (1) (4) (5)		481,841			6,485			5.38			460,450			6,578			5.71
Total interest earning assets		645,178			7,717			4.78			636,460			7,965			5.01
Non-interest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		9,765									10,120
Allowance for loan losses		(5,917	)								(5,358	)
Other assets		37,849									46,985
Total non-interest earning assets		41,697									51,747
Total Assets	$	686,875								$	688,207
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand and money market	$	170,573			125			0.29		$	160,344			165			0.41
Savings		67,668			16			0.09			84,062			61			0.29
Time		212,590			756			1.42			209,106			828			1.58
Total interest bearing deposits		450,831			897			0.79			453,512			1,054			0.93
Short-term borrowings		27,565			14			0.20			28,956			24			0.33
Other borrowings		27,557			246			3.57			38,285			314			3.28
Total interest bearing liabilities		505,953			1,157			0.91			520,753			1,392			1.07
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		85,194									75,831
Other liabilities		3,947									5,204
Total non-interest bearing liabilities		89,141									81,035
Stockholders' equity		91,781									86,419
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	686,875								$	688,207

Net interest income (tax equivalent basis)					6,560			3.87	%					6,573			3.94	%
Tax-equivalent basis adjustment					(308	)								(310	)
Net interest income				$	6,252								$	6,263
Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis)								4.07	%								4.13	%

(1) Interest and yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a marginal tax rate of 34%.

(2) Average balances have been calculated based on daily balances.

(3) Annualized

(4) Loan balances include non-accrual loans and are net of unearned income.

(5) Loan yields include the effect of amortization of deferred fees, net of costs.

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table shows the fully taxable equivalent effect of changes in volumes and rates on interest income and interest expense.

	Increase/(Decrease) Three months ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Three months ended September 30, 2011 Variance due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Interest bearing deposits with banks	$	(7	)	$	(2	)	$	(9	)
Securities held to maturity		-			(1	)		(1	)
Securities available for sale:
Taxable		(11	)		(136	)		(147	)
Tax-exempt securities		98			(96	)		2
Total securities		87			(232	)		(145	)
Loans receivable		1,315			(1,408	)		(93	)
Total interest earning assets		1,395			(1,643	)		(248	)

Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand and money market		62			(103	)		(41	)
Savings		(10	)		(35	)		(45	)
Time		85			(157	)		(72	)
Total interest bearing deposits		137			(295	)		(158	)
Short-term borrowings		(1	)		(9	)		(10	)
Other borrowings		(221	)		153			(68	)
Total interest bearing liabilities		(85	)		(151	)		(236	)
Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis)	$	1,480		$	(1,492	)	$	(12	)

Changes in net interest income that could not be specifically identified as either a rate or volume change were allocated proportionately to changes in volume and changes in rate.

Comparison of Operating Results for The Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2011

General

For the three months ended September 30, 2012, net income totaled $2,200,000 compared to $2,215,000 earned in the similar period in 2011. The slight decrease was the result of additional loan loss provisions in the amount of $475,000 which offset improvements of $85,000 in non-interest income and $397,000 in non-interest expenses. Earnings per share for the current period were $.67 for basic and fully diluted which equaled the $.67 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The resulting annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average equity for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were 1.27% and 9.54%, respectively, compared to 1.28% and 10.17%, respectively, for the similar period in 2011.

The following table sets forth changes in net income:

(dollars in thousands)	Three months ended September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2011
Net income three months ended September 30, 2011	$	2,215
Change due to:
Net interest income		(11	)
Provision for loan losses		(475	)
Gain on sales of loans and securities		129
Other income		(44	)
Salaries and employee benefits		27
Occupancy, furniture and equipment		(23	)
Merger related expenses		16
Foreclosed real estate expense		395
All other expenses		(18	)
Income tax expense		(11	)

Net income three months ended September 30, 2012	$	2,200

Net Interest Income

Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis (fte) for the three months ended September 30, 2012 totaled $6,560,000, a decrease of $13,000 from the similar period in 2011. The decrease in net interest income largely reflects the reduced earnings on loans and securities due to growth and reinvestment at current market rates. The fte net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.87% and 4.07%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to 3.94% and 4.13%, respectively, for the similar period in 2011.

Interest income (fte) totaled $7,717,000 with a yield on average earning assets of 4.78% compared to $7,965,000 and 5.01% for the 2011 period. Average loans increased $21.4 million over the comparable period of last year but interest income was reduced by $248,000 due to a 59 basis point reduction in the yield earned on taxable securities and a 33 basis point decrease in the yield on loans. Average earning assets totaled $645.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $8.7 million over the average for the similar period in 2011. This increase in average earning assets helped offset the decline in asset yields.

Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 totaled $1,157,000 at an average cost of .91% compared to $1,392,000 and 1.07% for the similar period in 2011. As a result of the continued low interest rate environment, the Company further reduced rates paid on its money market and savings accounts, and cash management products, which are included in short-term borrowings. The cost of time deposits, which is the most significant component of funding, declined to 1.42% from 1.58% for the similar period in the prior year. As time deposits matured, they repriced at the current lower rates resulting in the decrease.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $900,000 compared to $425,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The Company makes provisions for loan losses in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an acceptable level. Net charge-offs were $1,334,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 compared to $347,000 for the similar period in 2011. The increase in the current period includes a $1.0 million write-down on a loan which had previously been modified as a Troubled Debt Restructuring and had been classified as substandard.

Other Income

Other income totaled $1,591,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $1,506,000 for the similar period in 2011. The current period includes a $631,000 gain on the sale of investment securities compared to a $544,000 gain in the third quarter of 2011. Gains on the sale of residential mortgage loans increased $42,000 compared to the same quarter of last year. All other service charges and fees decreased $44,000 compared to the third quarter of last year.

Other Expense

Other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 totaled $3,957,000, or a decrease of $397,000 from $4,354,000 for the similar period in 2011. Foreclosed real estate costs decreased $395,000 due primarily to costs incurred on one property in 2011 that was subsequently disposed of.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense totaled $786,000 for an effective tax rate of 26.3% for the period ending September 30, 2012 compared to $775,000 for an effective tax rate of 25.6% for the similar period in 2011.

Results of Operations

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Average Balance Sheets with Resultant Interest and Rates

(Tax-Equivalent Basis, dollars in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012									2011
	Average Balance (2)			Interest (1)			Average Rate (3)			Average Balance (2)			Interest (1)			Average Rate (3)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold	$	-		$	-			0.00	%	$	737		$	-			0.07	%
Interest bearing deposits with banks		10,747			20			0.25			20,834			42			0.27
Securities held-to-maturity		172			7			5.43			170			10			7.84
Securities available for sale:
Taxable		95,511			1,539			2.15			98,131			1,971			2.68
Tax-exempt (1)		53,536			2,209			5.50			48,790			2,066			5.65
Total securities available for sale (1)		149,047			3,748			3.35			146,921			4,037			3.66
Loans receivable (1) (4) (5)		477,782			19,426			5.42			400,650			17,065			5.68
Total interest earning assets		637,748			23,201			4.85			569,312			21,154			4.95
Non-interest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		9,049									8,132
Allowance for loan losses		(5,746	)								(5,616	)
Other assets		39,018									33,978
Total non-interest earning assets		42,321									36,494
Total Assets	$	680,069								$	605,806
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand and money market	$	168,500			399			0.31		$	131,968			405			0.41
Savings		68,174			66			0.13			68,124			139			0.27
Time		220,536			2,335			1.41			189,301			2,327			1.64
Total interest bearing deposits		457,210			2,800			0.82			389,393			2,871			0.98
Short-term borrowings		21,811			38			0.23			29,140			75			0.34
Other borrowings		27,604			733			3.54			37,160			992			3.56
Total interest bearing liabilities		506,625			3,571			0.94			455,693			3,938			1.15
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		78,906									68,588
Other liabilities		3,995									4,902
Total non-interest bearing liabilities		82,901									73,490
Stockholders' equity		90,543									76,623
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	680,069								$	605,806

Net interest income (tax equivalent basis)					19,630			3.91	%					17,216			3.80	%
Tax-equivalent basis adjustment					(944	)								(854	)
Net interest income				$	18,686								$	16,362
Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis)								4.10	%								4.03	%

(1) Interest and yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a marginal tax rate of 34%.

(2) Average balances have been calculated based on daily balances.

(3) Annualized

(4) Loan balances include non-accrual loans and are net of unearned income.

(5) Loan yields include the effect of amortization of deferred fees, net of costs.

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table shows the fully taxable equivalent effect of changes in volumes and rates on interest income and interest expense. Changes in net interest income that could not be specifically identified as either a rate or volume change were allocated proportionately to changes in volume and changes in rate.

	Increase/(Decrease) Nine months ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2011 Variance due to
	Volume			Rate			Net
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Interest bearing deposits with banks…………..	$	(19	)	$	(3	)	$	(22	)
Securities held to maturity............................		-			(3	)		(3	)
Securities available for sale:
Taxable...................................................		(51	)		(381	)		(432	)
Tax-exempt securities..................................		225			(82	)		143
Total securities..........................................		174			(463	)		(289	)
Loans receivable........................................		3,583			(1,222	)		2,361
Total interest earning assets...........................		3,738			(1,691	)		2,047

Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand and money market….		132			(139	)		(7	)
Savings................................................		-			(73	)		(73	)
Time...................................................		472			(464	)		8
Total interest bearing deposits.......................		604			(676	)		(72	)
Short-term borrowings................................		(16	)		(21	)		(37	)
Other borrowings......................................		(254	)		(5	)		(259	)
Total interest bearing liabilities.....................		334			(702	)		(368	)
Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis).........	$	3,404		$	(989	)	$	2,415

Changes in net interest income that could not be specifically identified as either a rate or volume change were allocated proportionately to changes in volume and changes in rate.

Comparison of Operating Results for The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2011

General

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net income totaled $6,644,000 compared to $5,359,000 earned in the similar period in 2011. Earnings per share for the current period were $2.03

for basic and $2.02 fully diluted compared to $1.79 per share for both basic and diluted for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The resulting annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 1.30% and 9.80%, respectively, compared to 1.18% and 9.35%, respectively, for the similar period in 2011.

The following table sets forth changes in net income:

(dollars in thousands)	Nine months ended September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2011
Net income nine months ended September 30, 2011	$	5,359
Change due to:
Net interest income		2,324
Provision for loan losses		(575	)
Gain on sales of loans and securities		411
Other income		(30	)
Salaries and employee benefits		(638	)
Occupancy, furniture and equipment		(194	)
Merger related expenses		753
Foreclosed real estate expense		224
All other expenses		(382	)
Income tax expense		(608	)

Net income nine months ended September 30, 2012	$	6,644

Net Interest Income

Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis (fte) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 totaled $19,630,000, an increase of $2,414,000 or 14.0% from the similar period in 2011. The increase in net interest income largely reflects the increase in interest-earning assets from the North Penn acquisition, as well as loan growth recorded during the period. The fte net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.91% and 4.10%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to 3.80% and 4.03%, respectively, for the similar period in 2011.

Interest income (fte) totaled $23,201,000 with a yield on average earning assets of 4.85% compared to $21,154,000 and 4.95% for the 2011 period. Residential mortgage rates have continued to decline causing a portion of the portfolio to refinance at lower rates, while much of the new growth was also recorded at rates lower than historic levels. As a result, the fte yield on average loans in the current period was 5.42%, a decrease from 5.68% in the 2011 period. The yield on investment securities also declined 31 basis points reflecting the reinvestment of cash flow, maturities and calls at the current lower rates. Average earning assets totaled $637.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 an increase of $68.4 million over the similar period in 2011. The growth in average earning assets helped offset the decline in loan and securities yields.

Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 totaled $3,571,000 at an average cost of .94% compared to $3,938,000 and 1.15% for the 2011 period. The Company reduced rates paid on its deposits by 16 basis points and short-term borrowings by 11 basis points. The cost of time deposits, which is the largest component of interest expense, was 1.41% for the 2012 period decreasing from 1.64% in 2011. This reflects time deposits maturing and repricing at the current lower rates.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $1,650,000 compared to $1,075,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The Company makes provisions for loan losses in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an acceptable level. The increase in the provision was necessary to maintain the reserve at an adequate level after accounting for loan growth and charge-offs for the period ended September 30, 2012. Net charge-offs were $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $1.3 million for the similar period in 2011. In 2012, the total charge-offs included a $1.0 million write-down on a loan that had previously been modified as a Troubled Debt Restructuring and was classified as substandard. During the 2011 period the charge-off total was due primarily to one credit which had been carried in nonaccrual status.

Other Income

Other income totaled $4,088,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $3,707,000 for the similar period in 2011. The current period includes $143,000 in gains on the sale of $4.3 million of residential mortgage loans compared to $282,000 in similar gains on the sales of $8.7 million of mortgage loans in the 2011 period. Gains on the sale investment securities totaled $1,318,000 on sales of $23.3 million for the 2012 period compared to $768,000 of gains on sales of $27.7 million in the similar 2011 period. The proceeds from investment securities sales were reinvested to improve credit quality in the Company’s bond portfolio as well as to fund new securities purchases and loan growth.

Other Expense

Other expenses totaled $12,061,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 an increase of $237,000 compared to $11,824,000 for the similar period in 2011. The increase was due to costs related to the operation of five offices acquired from North Penn in 2011. Salary and benefit costs increased $638,000 due to the added staff while occupancy and equipment expenses rose $194,000. The majority of these increases were offset by a $753,000 decrease in merger related costs and a $224,000 decrease in foreclosed real estate expenses. The efficiency ratio for the 2012 period was 50.8% compared to 56.5% in the 2011 period due to the acquisition costs recorded in 2011.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense totaled $2,419,000 for an effective tax rate of 26.7% in the 2012 period compared to $1,811,000 and 25.3% in 2011. The increase in the effective tax rate reflects a 34% tax rate on $1,893,000 of additional pre-tax income.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market Risk

Interest rate sensitivity and the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities are managed by the Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The principal objective of ALCO is to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of risk, which are established by policy. Interest rate risk is monitored and managed by using financial modeling techniques to measure the impact of changes in interest rates.

Net interest income, which is the primary source of the Company’s earnings, is impacted by changes in interest rates and the relationship of different interest rates. To manage the impact of the rate changes, the balance sheet must be structured so that repricing opportunities exist for both assets and liabilities at approximately the same time intervals. The Company uses net interest simulation to assist in interest rate risk management. The process includes simulating various interest rate environments and their impact on net interest income. As of September 30, 2012, the level of net interest income at risk in a 200 basis point change in interest rates was within the Company’s policy limits. The Company’s policy allows for a decline of no more than 8% of net interest income for a ± 200 basis point shift in interest rates.

Imbalance in repricing opportunities at a given point in time reflects interest-sensitivity gaps measured as the difference between rate-sensitive assets (RSA) and rate-sensitive liabilities (RSL). These are static gap measurements that do not take into account any future activity, and as such are principally used as early indications of potential interest rate exposures over specific intervals.

As of September 30, 2012, the Company had a positive 90 day interest sensitivity gap of $80.2 million or 11.5% of total assets, compared to the $76.7 million or 11.5% of total assets as of December 31, 2011. Rate sensitive assets repricing within 90 days increased $22.2 million due to a $12.4 million increase in interest bearing deposits, a $5.9 million increase in loans repricing within the period and a $3.9 million increase in securities repricing. Time deposits repricing within 90 days increased $9.1 million, while non-maturity interest bearing balances and other borrowings increased $9.6 million. A positive gap means that rate-sensitive assets are greater than rate-sensitive liabilities at the time interval. This would indicate that in a rising rate environment, the yield on interest-earning assets could increase faster than the cost of interest-bearing liabilities in the 90 day time frame. The repricing intervals are managed by ALCO strategies, including adjusting the average life of the investment portfolio, pricing of deposit liabilities to attract longer term time deposits, loan pricing to encourage variable rate products and evaluation of loan sales of long-term fixed rate mortgages.

September 30, 2012

Rate Sensitivity Table

(dollars in thousands)

	3 Months			3-12 Months			1 to 3 Years			Over 3 Years			Total
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits	$	24,825		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	24,825
Securities		14,591			29,220			56,305			47,695			147,811
Loans Receivable		127,308			100,581			135,252			116,360			479,501
Total RSA		166,724			129,801			191,557			164,055			652,137

Non-maturity interest-bearing deposits		39,285			44,102			117,523			40,606			241,516
Time Deposits		34,726			70,311			77,397			28,422			210,856
Other		12,476			16,065			21,378			10,000			59,919
Total RSL		86,487			130,478			216,298			79,028			512,291


Interest Sensitivity Gap	$	80,237		$	(677	)	$	(24,741	)	$	85,027		$	139,846
Cumulative Gap		80,237			79,560			54,819			139,846
RSA/RSL-cumulative		192.8	%		136.7	%		112.6	%		127.3	%

December 31, 2011

Interest Sensitivity Gap	$	76,745		$	(21,350	)	$	(6,566	)	$	68,689		$	117,518
Cumulative Gap		76,745			55,395			48,829			117,518
RSA/RSL-cumulative		213.2	%		125.2	%		111.8	%		125.3	%

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Not applicable

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors affecting the Company that were identified in Item 1A of Part 1 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Sales and Use of Proceeds

Set forth below is information on the Registrant’s stock repurchases during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.

	Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
	Total number of shares purchased		Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs(1)	Maximum number of shares (or approximate dollar value) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

July 1 – July 31, 2012		-	$	-	0	123,000
August 1 – August 31, 2012		-	$	-	0	123,000
September 1 – September 30, 2012		-	$	-	0	123,000
		-		-	0	123,000

(1)	On March 19, 2008, the Registrant announced its intention to repurchase up to 5% of its outstanding common stock (approximately 137,000 shares) in the open market.

On November 10, 2011, the Registrant announced that the Company had increased the number of shares which may be repurchased under its open-market program to 5% of its currently outstanding shares, or approximately 164,000 shares.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclsoures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

No.	Description

3(i)	Articles of Incorporation of Norwood Financial Corp. (1)
3(ii)	Bylaws of Norwood Financial Corp. (2)
4.0	Specimen Stock Certificate of Norwood Financial Corp. (1)
10.1	Employment Agreement with Lewis J. Critelli (2)
10.2	Change in Control Severance Agreement with William S. Lance (2)

10.3	Norwood Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan (3)
10.4	Salary Continuation Agreement between the Bank and William W. Davis, Jr. (4)
10.5	Salary Continuation Agreement between the Bank and Lewis J. Critelli (4)
10.7	1999 Directors Stock Compensation Plan (3)
10.8	Salary Continuation Agreement between the Bank and Joseph A. Kneller (5)
10.9	Salary Continuation Agreement between the Bank and John H. Sanders (5)
10.10	2006 Stock Option Plan (6)
10.11	First and Second Amendments to Salary Continuation Agreement with William W. Davis, Jr. (7)
10.12	First and Second Amendments to Salary Continuation Agreement with Lewis J. Critelli (7)
10.14	First and Second Amendments to Salary Continuation Agreement with Joseph A. Kneller (7)
10.15	First and Second Amendments to Salary Continuation Agreement with John H. Sanders (7)
31	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO and CFO
32	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
101	Interactive Data Files *

______________________

* Submitted as Exhibits 101 to this Form 10-Q are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

(1)	Incorporated herein by reference into this document from the Exhibits to Form 10, Registration Statement initially filed with the Commission on April 29, 1996, Registration No. 0-28364

(2)	Incorporated by reference into this document from the identically numbered exhibits to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 15, 2010.

(3)	Incorporated herein by reference to the identically numbered exhibits of the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 23, 2000.

(4)	Incorporated by reference into this document from the Exhibits to Form S-8 filed with the Commission on August 14, 1998, File No. 333-61487.

(5)	Incorporated herein by reference to the identically numbered exhibit to the Registrant’s F orm 10-K filed with the Commission on March 22, 2004.

(6)	Incorporated by reference to this document from Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-134831) filed with the Commission on June 8, 2006.

(7)	Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2006.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP.

Date:	November 9, 2012	By:	/s/ Lewis J. Critelli
			Lewis J. Critelli
			President and Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:	November 9, 2012	By:	/s/ William S. Lance
			William S. Lance
			Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements Item 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4. Controls and Procedures Part II. Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Sales and Use Of Proceeds Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities Item 4. Mine Safety Disclsoures Item 5. Other Information Item 6. Exhibits

NWFL 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012