PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
|
||
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
||
|
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
||
|
FORM 10-K
|
||
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
|
||
|
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
||
|
For the fiscal year ended:
December 31, 2010
|
||
|
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
|
|
|
(
Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
|
000-27205
|
56-2132396
|
|
(Commission File No.)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
518 West C Street, Newton, North Carolina
|
28658
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
(828) 464-5620
|
|
|
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
|
|
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
|
|
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock, no par value
|
|
|
(title of class)
|
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
|
Yes
|
o |
No
|
x |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
|
Yes
|
o |
No
|
x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
Yes
|
x |
No
|
o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
|
Yes
|
o |
No
|
x |
|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
|
Large Accelerate Filer
|
o |
Accelerated Filer
|
o |
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
o |
Smaller Reporting Company
|
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
Yes
|
o | No |
x
|
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $21,022,031 based on the closing price of such common stock on June 30, 2010, which was $4.80 per share.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
5,541,413 shares of common stock, outstanding at February 28, 2011.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”), which will be included as Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, are incorporated by reference into Part I and Part II and included as Exhibit 13 to the Form 10-K.
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. to be held on May 5, 2011 (the “Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference into Part III.
2
|
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC
|
||
|
FORM 10-K CROSS REFERENCE INDEX
|
||
|
2010 Form
1
0-K
|
Notice of 2011
Annual Meeting,
Proxy Statement
and Annual Report
|
|
|
Page
|
Page
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
Item 1 - Business
|
4 - 13
|
N/A
|
|
Item 1A - Risk Factors
|
13 - 23
|
N/A
|
|
Item 1B - Unresolved Staff Comments
|
23
|
N/A
|
|
Item 2 - Properties
|
24
|
N/A
|
|
Item 3 - Legal Proceedings
|
24
|
N/A
|
|
Item 4 - [Removed and Reserved}
|
24
|
N/A
|
|
PART II
|
||
|
Item 5 - Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder
|
||
|
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
25 - 27
|
N/A
|
|
Item 6 - Selected Financial Data
|
27
|
A-3
|
|
Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
||
|
Results of Operations
|
27
|
A-4 - A-28
|
|
Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
27
|
A-27 - A-28
|
|
Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
28
|
A-29 - A-63
|
|
Item 9 - Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
|
||
|
and Financial Disclosure
|
28
|
N/A
|
|
Item 9A(T) - Controls and Procedures
|
29
|
N/A
|
|
Item 9B - Other Information
|
29
|
N/A
|
|
PART III
|
||
|
Item 10 - Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
30
|
A-64
|
|
Item 11 - Executive Compensation
|
30
|
18 - 30
|
|
Item 12 - Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
||
|
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
30 - 31
|
6 - 9
|
|
Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
||
|
and Director Independence
|
31
|
29 - 30
|
|
Item 14 - Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
31
|
31
|
|
PART IV
|
||
|
Item 15 - Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
32 - 35
|
N/A
|
|
Signatures
|
36
|
N/A
|
3
General
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. (the “Company”), was formed in 1999 to serve as the holding company for Peoples Bank (the “Bank”). The Company is a bank holding company registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”). The Company’s principal source of income is any dividends which are declared and paid by the Bank on its capital stock. The Company has no operations and conducts no business of its own other than owning the Bank. Accordingly, the discussion of the business which follows concerns the business conducted by the Bank, unless otherwise indicated.
The Bank, founded in 1912, is a state-chartered commercial bank serving the citizens and business interests of the Catawba Valley and surrounding communities through 22 banking offices located in Lincolnton, Newton, Denver, Catawba, Conover, Maiden, Claremont, Hiddenite, Hickory, Charlotte, Monroe, Cornelius, Mooresville and Raleigh North Carolina. The Bank also operates a loan production office in Denver, North Carolina. At December 31, 2010, the Company had total assets of $1.1 billion, net loans of $710.7 million, deposits of $838.7 million, total securities of $278.2 million, and shareholders’ equity of $96.9 million.
The Bank operates four offices focused on the Latino population under the name Banco de la Gente (“Banco”). These offices are operated as a division of the Bank. Banco offers normal and customary banking services as are offered in the Bank’s other branches such as the taking of deposits and the making of loans and therefore is not considered a reportable segment of the Company.
The Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, with no foreign loans and few agricultural loans. Real estate loans are predominately variable rate commercial property loans, which include residential development loans to commercial customers. Commercial loans are spread throughout a variety of industries with no one particular industry or group of related industries accounting for a significant portion of the commercial loan portfolio. The majority of the Bank's deposit and loan customers are individuals and small to medium-sized businesses located in the Bank's market area. The Bank’s loan portfolio also includes Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) mortgage loans generated thorough the Bank’s Banco offices. Additional discussion of the Bank’s loan portfolio and sources of funds for loans can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on pages
A-4 through A-28
of the Annual Report, which is included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit 13.
The operations of the Bank and depository institutions in general are significantly influenced by general economic conditions and by related monetary and fiscal policies of depository institution regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks (the "Commissioner").
At December 31, 2010, the Company employed 244 full-time employees and 44 part-time employees, which equated to 273 full-time equivalent employees.
Subsidiaries
The Bank is a subsidiary of the Company. The Bank has two subsidiaries, Peoples Investment Services, Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc.
Through a relationship with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., Peoples Investment Services, Inc. provides the Bank's customers access to investment counseling and non-deposit investment products such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, tax deferred annuities, and related brokerage services. Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. provides real estate appraisal and real estate brokerage services.
In June 2006, the Company formed a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust, PEBK Capital Trust II (“PEBK Trust II”), which issued $20.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust II are owned by the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the trust preferred securities were used by PEBK Trust II to purchase $20.6 million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of the junior subordinated debentures were
4
used in December 2006 to repay the trust preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust in December 2001 and for general purposes. The debentures represent the sole asset of PEBK Trust II. PEBK Trust II is not included in the consolidated financial statements.
The trust preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust II accrue and pay quarterly at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The Company has guaranteed distributions and other payments due on the trust preferred securities to the extent PEBK Trust II does not have funds with which to make the distributions and other payments. The net combined effect of the trust preferred securities transaction is that the Company is obligated to make the distributions and other payments required on the trust preferred securities.
These trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the debentures on June 28, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures purchased by PEBK Trust II, in whole or in part, on or after June 28, 2011. As specified in the indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid interest.
The Company established a new subsidiary, Community Bank Real Estate Solutions, LLC (“CBRES”), in 2009. CBRES serves as a “clearing-house” for appraisal services for community banks. Other banks are able to contract with CBRES to find and engage appropriate appraisal companies in the area where the property is located. This type of service ensures that the appraisal process remains independent from the financing process within the bank.
Market Area
The Bank's primary market consists of the communities in an approximately 50-mile radius around its headquarters office in Newton, North Carolina. This area includes Catawba County, Alexander County, Lincoln County, Iredell County and portions of northeast Gaston County. The Bank is located only 40 miles north of Charlotte, North Carolina and the Bank's primary market area is and will continue to be significantly affected by its close proximity to this major metropolitan area. The Bank has two Banco offices in Mecklenburg County, one Banco office in Union County and one Banco office in Wake County specifically designed to serve the growing Latino market.
Employment in the Bank's primary market area is diversified among manufacturing, retail and wholesale trade, technology, services and utilities. Catawba County’s largest employers include Catawba County Schools, Frye Regional Medical Center, Catawba Valley Medical Center, Merchant Distributors, Inc (wholesale food distributor), Catawba County, CommScope, Inc. (manufacturer of fiber optic cable and accessories), Corning Cable Systems (manufacturer of fiber optic cable and accessories), Ethan Allen (furniture manufacturer), CV Industries (furniture manufacturer) and Hickory Public Schools.
Competition
The Bank has operated in the Catawba Valley region for nearly 100 years and is the only financial institution headquartered in Newton. Nevertheless, the Bank faces strong competition both in attracting deposits and making loans. Its most direct competition for deposits has historically come from other commercial banks, credit unions and brokerage firms located in its primary market area, including large financial institutions. One national money center commercial bank is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. Based upon June 30, 2010 comparative data, the Bank had 23.45% of the deposits in Catawba County, placing it second in deposit size among a total of 14 banks with branch offices in Catawba County; 14.17% of the deposits in Lincoln County, placing it third in deposit size among a total of ten banks with branch offices in Lincoln County and 13.00% of the deposits in Alexander County, placing it fifth in deposit size among a total of seven banks with branch offices in Alexander County.
The Bank also faces additional significant competition for investors' funds from short-term money market securities and other corporate and government securities. The Bank's deposit base has grown principally due to economic growth in the Bank's market area coupled with the implementation of new and competitive deposit products. The ability of the Bank to attract and retain deposits depends on its ability to generally provide a rate of return, liquidity and risk comparable to that offered by competing investment opportunities.
The Bank experiences strong competition for loans from commercial banks and mortgage banking companies. The Bank competes for loans primarily through the interest rates and loan fees it charges and the efficiency and quality of services it provides borrowers. Competition is increasing as a result of the continuing reduction of restrictions on the interstate operations of financial institutions.
5
Supervision and Regulation
Bank holding companies and commercial banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. The following is a brief summary of all material statutes and rules and regulations that affect or will affect the Company, the Bank and any subsidiaries. Supervision, regulation and examination of the Company and the Bank by the regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors rather than shareholders of the Company. Statutes and regulations which contain wide-ranging proposals for altering the structures, regulations and competitive relationship of financial institutions are introduced regularly. The Company cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed statute or regulation will be adopted or the extent to which the business of the Company and the Bank may be affected by such statute or regulation.
General
.
There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries by law and regulatory policy that are designed to minimize potential loss to the depositors of such depository institutions and the FDIC insurance funds in the event the depository institution becomes in danger of default or in default. For example, to avoid receivership of an insured depository institution subsidiary, a bank holding company is required to guarantee the compliance of any insured depository institution subsidiary that may become “undercapitalized” with the terms of the capital restoration plan filed by such subsidiary with its appropriate federal banking agency up to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5% of the bank's total assets at the time the bank became undercapitalized or (ii) the amount which is necessary (or would have been necessary) to bring the bank into compliance with all acceptable capital standards as of the time the bank fails to comply with such capital restoration plan. The Company, as a registered bank holding company, is subject to the regulation of the Federal Reserve. Under a policy of the Federal Reserve with respect to bank holding company operations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent such policy. The Federal Reserve under the BHCA also has the authority to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or to relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary (other than a nonbank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserve's determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness and stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.
In addition, insured depository institutions under common control are required to reimburse the FDIC for any loss suffered by its deposit insurance funds as a result of the default of a commonly controlled insured depository institution or for any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled insured depository institution in danger of default. The FDIC may decline to enforce the cross-guarantee provisions if it determines that a waiver is in the best interest of the deposit insurance funds. The FDIC's claim for damages is superior to claims of stockholders of the insured depository institution or its holding company but is subordinate to claims of depositors, secured creditors and holders of subordinated debt (other than affiliates) of the commonly controlled insured depository institutions.
As a result of the Company's ownership of the Bank, the Company is also registered under the bank holding company laws of North Carolina. Accordingly, the Company is also subject to regulation and supervision by the Commissioner.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) gave the UST authority to take certain actions to restore liquidity and stability to the U.S. banking markets. Based upon its authority in the EESA, a number of programs to implement EESA have been announced. The first program implemented by the UST is the Capital Purchase Program CPP. Pursuant to this program, the UST, on behalf of the US government, is authorized to purchase preferred stock, along with warrants to purchase common stock, from certain financial institutions, including bank holding companies, savings and loan holding companies and banks or savings associations not controlled by a holding company. The investment will have a dividend rate of 5% per year, until the fifth anniversary of the UST’s investment and a dividend of 9% thereafter. During the time the UST holds securities issued pursuant to this program, participating financial institutions will be required to comply with certain provisions regarding executive compensation and corporate governance. Participation in this program also imposes certain restrictions upon an institution’s dividends to common shareholders and stock repurchase activities. As described further herein, we elected to participate in the CPP and received $25.1 million pursuant to the program.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposes certain new executive compensation and corporate governance obligations on all current and future CPP recipients, including the Company, until the institution has redeemed the preferred stock, which CPP recipients are now permitted to do under ARRA without regard to the three year holding period and without the need to raise new capital, subject to approval of its primary federal regulator.
6
Additionally, ARRA amends Section 111 of EESA to require the Treasury to adopt additional standards with respect to executive compensation and corporate governance for CPP recipients, which are set forth in the TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance: Interim Final Rule (“Interim Final Rule”), adopted by the Treasury on June 15, 2009. Among the executive compensation and corporate governance provisions included in ARRA and the Interim Final Rule are the following:
|
·
|
an incentive compensation “clawback” provision to cover “senior executive officers” (defined in this instance and below to mean the “named executive officers” for whom compensation disclosure is provided in the company’s proxy statement) and the next 20 most highly compensated employees;
|
|
·
|
a prohibition on certain golden parachute payments to cover any payment related to a departure for any reason (with limited exceptions) made to any senior executive officer (as defined above) and the next five most highly compensated employees;
|
|
·
|
a limitation on incentive compensation paid or accrued to the five most highly compensated employees of the financial institution, subject to limited exceptions for pre-existing arrangements set forth in written employment contracts executed on or prior to February 11, 2009, and certain awards of restricted stock which may not exceed one-third of annual compensation, are subject to a two-year holding period and cannot be transferred until the UST’s preferred stock is redeemed in full;
|
|
·
|
a requirement that a company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer provide in annual securities filings, a written certification of compliance with the executive compensation and corporate governance provisions of the Interim Final Rule;
|
|
·
|
an obligation for the compensation committee of the board of directors to evaluate with a company’s chief risk officer certain compensation plans to ensure that such plans do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risks or the manipulation of reported earnings;
|
|
·
|
a requirement that companies adopt a company-wide policy regarding excessive or luxury expenditures;
|
|
·
|
a requirement that companies permit a separate, non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of executives; and
|
|
·
|
a provision that allows the Treasury to review compensation paid prior to enactment of ARRA to senior executive officers and the next 20 most highly-compensated employees to determine whether any payments were inconsistent with the executive compensation restrictions of EESA, CPP or otherwise contrary to the public interest.
|
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ( the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Dodd-Frank Act will have a broad impact on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance changes including, among other things, (i) enhanced resolution authority of troubled and failing banks and their holding companies; (ii) increased capital and liquidity requirements; (iii) increased regulatory examination fees; (iv) changes to assessments to be paid to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance; and (v) numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and strengthening safety and soundness for, the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act establishes a new framework for systemic risk oversight within the financial system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies, including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC. A summary of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act is set forth below.
|
·
|
Increased Capital Standards and Enhanced Supervision.
The federal banking agencies are required to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements for banks and bank holding companies. These new standards will be no lower than current regulatory capital and leverage standards applicable to insured depository institutions and may, in fact, be higher when established by the agencies. The Dodd-Frank Act also increases regulatory oversight, supervision and examination of banks, bank holding companies and their respective subsidiaries by the appropriate regulatory agency.
|
7
|
·
|
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”).
The Dodd-Frank Act creates the Bureau within the Federal Reserve. The Bureau is tasked with establishing and implementing rules and regulations under certain federal consumer protection laws with respect to the conduct of providers of certain consumer financial products and services. The Bureau has rulemaking authority over many of the statutes governing products and services offered to bank customers. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and regulations that are more stringent than those regulations promulgated by the Bureau and state attorneys general are permitted to enforce consumer protection rules adopted by the Bureau against state- chartered institutions.
|
|
·
|
Deposit Insurance.
The Dodd-Frank Act makes permanent the $250,000 deposit insurance limit for insured deposits. Amendments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act also revise the assessment base against which an insured depository institution’s deposit insurance premiums paid to the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) will be calculated. Under the amendments, the assessment base will no longer be the institution’s deposit base, but rather its average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity during the assessment period. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act makes changes to the minimum designated reserve ratio of the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15 percent to 1.35 percent of the estimated amount of total insured deposits and eliminating the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds. In December 2010, the FDIC increased the reserve ratio to 2.0 percent. The Dodd- Frank Act also provides that, effective one year after the date of enactment, depository institutions may pay interest on demand deposits.
|
|
·
|
Transactions with Affiliates.
The Dodd-Frank Act enhances the requirements for certain transactions with affiliates under Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, including an expansion of the definition of “covered transactions” and increasing the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered transactions must be maintained.
|
|
·
|
Transactions with Insiders.
Insider transaction limitations are expanded through the strengthening of loan restrictions to insiders and the expansion of the types of transactions subject to the various limits, including derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending or borrowing transactions. Restrictions are also placed on certain asset sales to and from an insider to an institution, including requirements that such sales be on market terms and, in certain circumstances, approved by the institution’s board of directors.
|
|
·
|
Enhanced Lending Limits.
The Dodd-Frank Act strengthens the existing limits on a depository institution’s credit exposure to one borrower. Current banking law limits a depository institution’s ability to extend credit to one person (or group of related persons) in an amount exceeding certain thresholds. The Dodd-Frank Act expands the scope of these restrictions to include credit exposure arising from derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, and securities lending and borrowing transactions.
|
|
·
|
Compensation Practices.
The Dodd-Frank Act provides that the appropriate federal regulators must establish standards prohibiting as an unsafe and unsound practice any compensation plan of a bank holding company or other “covered financial institution” that provides an insider or other employee with “excessive compensation” or could lead to a material financial loss to such firm. In June 2010, prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, the bank regulatory agencies promulgated the Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, which requires that financial institutions establish metrics for measuring the impact of activities to achieve incentive compensation with the related risk to the financial institution of such behavior. Together, the Dodd-Frank Act and the recent guidance on compensation may impact the current compensation policies at the Company.
|
|
·
|
Holding Company Capital Levels.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires bank regulators to establish minimum capital levels for holding companies that are at least of the same nature as those applicable to financial institutions. All trust preferred securities, or TRUPs, issued by bank or thrift holding companies after May 19, 2010 will be counted as Tier II Capital (with an exception for certain small bank holding companies). Bank holding companies with at least $15 billion in assets as of December 31, 2009 will have five years to comply with this provision, and starting on January 1, 2013, these holding companies will phase in the requirement by deducting one-third of TRUPs per year for the following three years from Tier 1 capital. TRUPs issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank holding companies with less than $15 billion in assets as of December 31, 2009 are exempt from these capital deductions entirely.
|
8
We expect that many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented over time, and most will be subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the impact such requirements will have on financial institutions’ operations is unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.
Capital Adequacy Guidelines for Holding Companies
.
The Federal Reserve has adopted capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies and banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System and have consolidated assets of $150 million or more. Bank holding companies subject to the Federal Reserve’s capital adequacy guidelines are required to comply with the Federal Reserve's risk-based capital guidelines. Under these regulations, the minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is 8%. At least half of the total capital is required to be “Tier I capital,” principally consisting of common stockholders' equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, and a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, less certain goodwill items. The remainder (“Tier II capital”) may consist of a limited amount of subordinated debt, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt securities, perpetual preferred stock, and a limited amount of the general loan loss allowance. In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the Federal Reserve has adopted a minimum Tier I capital (leverage) ratio, under which a bank holding company must maintain a minimum level of Tier I capital to average total consolidated assets of at least 3% in the case of a bank holding company which has the highest regulatory examination rating and is not contemplating significant growth or expansion. All other bank holding companies are expected to maintain a Tier I capital (leverage) ratio of at least 1% to 2% above the stated minimum.
Capital Requirements for the Bank.
The Bank, as a North Carolina commercial bank, is required to maintain a surplus account equal to 50% or more of its paid-in capital stock. As a North Carolina chartered, FDIC-insured commercial bank which is not a member of the Federal Reserve System, the Bank is also subject to capital requirements imposed by the FDIC. Under the FDIC's regulations, state nonmember banks that (a) receive the highest rating during the examination process and (b) are not anticipating or experiencing any significant growth, are required to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 3% of total consolidated assets; all other banks are required to maintain a minimum ratio of 1% or 2% above the stated minimum, with a minimum leverage ratio of not less than 4%. The Bank exceeded all applicable capital requirements as of December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the Company’s Tier I risk-based capital and total risk-based capital were 14.24% and 15.51%, respectively.
Dividend and Repurchase Limitations
.
The Company must obtain Federal Reserve approval prior to repurchasing its Common Stock in excess of 10% of its net worth during any twelve-month period unless the Company (i) both before and after the redemption satisfies capital requirements for "well capitalized" state member banks; (ii) received a one or two rating in its last examination; and (iii) is not the subject of any unresolved supervisory issues. Due to the Company's participation in the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) , United States Treasury (“UST”) approval is required for the Company to repurchase shares of outstanding common stock.
Although the payment of dividends and repurchase of stock by the Company are subject to certain requirements and limitations of North Carolina corporate law, except as set forth in this paragraph, neither the Commissioner nor the FDIC have promulgated any regulations specifically limiting the right of the Company to pay dividends and repurchase shares. However, the ability of the Company to pay dividends or repurchase shares may be dependent upon the Company's receipt of dividends from the Bank.
North Carolina commercial banks, such as the Bank, are subject to legal limitations on the amounts of dividends they are permitted to pay. Dividends may be paid by the Bank from undivided profits, which are determined by deducting and charging certain items against actual profits, including any contributions to surplus required by North Carolina law. Also, an insured depository institution, such as the Bank, is prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become "undercapitalized" (as such term is defined in the applicable law and regulations).
9
Under the terms of the CPP, the UST has a preferential right to the payment of cumulative dividends on the CPP Series A preferred stock. No dividends are permitted to be paid to common shareholders unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods on the CPP preferred stock were fully paid. Any increase in dividends to common shareholders above the amount last declared prior to December 23, 2008 ($0.12 per share quarterly in the case of the Company) is subject to the consent of the UST for the first three years of the CPP preferred stock investment.
Deposit Insurance
.
The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC. The Bank’s deposits, therefore, are subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessment.
On February 27, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule modifying the risk-based assessment system and setting initial base assessment rates beginning April 1, 2009, at 12 to 45 basis points; and due to extraordinary circumstances, extended the time within which the reserve ratio must be returned to 1.15 percent from five to seven years. The Bank‘s base assessment averaged 12.94 basis points in 2009. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis point special assessment on each insured depository institution's assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The Bank incurred an expense of $453,000 in 2009 as a result of the special assessment.
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC amended its regulations requiring certain insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. The Company’s prepaid assessment for these periods amounting to $5.0 million was collected on December 30, 2009, along with each institution's regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessment for the third quarter of 2009. The prepayment has been treated as a prepaid expense on the books of the Company, and will be recognized as expense in the period for which the assessments are effective.
The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increases the maximum deposit insurance amount for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, and extends unlimited deposit insurance to non-interest bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012. The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for FDIC insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the FDIC to increase the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits by 2020 and eliminates the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to insured depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds. Effective one year from the date of enactment, the Dodd-Frank Act eliminates the federal statutory prohibition against the payment of interest on business checking accounts.
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.
On October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced its Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”), which is comprised of the Debt Guarantee Program (“DGP”) and the Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAGP”).
The TAGP provided unlimited deposit insurance coverage through December 31, 2009, for non-interest bearing transaction accounts and certain interest-bearing accounts (negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) accounts with interest rates of 0.50% or less and lawyers trust accounts) at FDIC-insured depository institutions. Depository institutions participating in the TAGP are assessed, on a quarterly basis, an annualized 10 basis points fee on the balance of each covered account in excess of the existing FDIC deposit insurance limit of $250,000 that was established on a temporary basis, through December 31, 2009. The $250,000 deposit insurance coverage limit was scheduled to return to $100,000 on January 1, 2010, but was extended by congressional action until December 31, 2013. The TLGP was extended to cover debt of FDIC-insured institutions issued through December 31, 2010, and the TAGP was extended through December 31, 2010. The Company has participated in the TAGP since its beginning, and elected to continue its participation during the extension period.
The DGP provides an FDIC guarantee of certain senior unsecured debt of FDIC-insured institutions and their holding companies. The unsecured debt must be issued on or after October 14, 2008 and not later than October 31, 2009, and the guarantee is effective through the earlier of the maturity date or June 30, 2012. The DGP coverage limit is generally 125% of the eligible entity’s eligible debt outstanding on September 30, 2008 and scheduled to mature on or before June 30, 2009 or, for certain insured institutions, 2% of their liabilities as of September 30, 2008. The proceeds of debt guaranteed under the DGP may not be used to prepay debt that is not guaranteed by the FDIC. Depending on the term of the debt maturity, the nonrefundable DGP fee ranges from 50 to 100 basis points (annualized) for covered debt outstanding until the earlier of maturity or June 30, 2012. The Company is eligible to participate in the DGP although the it has not chosen to issue any debt under the program at this time.
10
FDIC Liquidation Authority under the Dodd-Frank Act
.
In January 2011, the FDIC issued an interim final rule on depositor preference which clarifies how the FDIC will treat certain creditors’ claims under the FDIC’s new liquidation authority under the Dodd-Frank Act, whereby the FDIC may be appointed as receiver for a financial company if the failure of such company and its liquidation under the Bankruptcy Code or other insolvency proceeding would pose significant risks to U.S. financial stability. Pursuant to the interim final rule, the FDIC will allow additional payments to a creditor in rare circumstances after the FDIC’s board of directors has determined that such payments meet certain statutory standards. The payments would be subject to recoupment; however, if the ultimate recoveries are insufficient to repay any temporary government-provided liquidity support. The interim final rule also (1) provides the FDIC with authority to continue a company’s operations by paying for services provided by employees and others; (2) clarifies how damages will be calculated for creditors’ contingent claims; and (3) describes the application of proceeds from the liquidation of subsidiaries.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
.
The FHLB system provides a central credit facility for member institutions. As a member of the FHLB of Atlanta, the Bank is required to own capital stock in the FHLB of Atlanta in an amount at least equal to 0.20% (or 20 basis points) of the Bank’s total assets at the end of each calendar year, plus 4.5% of its outstanding advances (borrowings) from the FHLB of Atlanta under the new activity-based stock ownership requirement. On December 31, 2010, the Bank was in compliance with this requirement.
Community Reinvestment.
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as implemented by regulations of the FDIC, an insured institution has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions, nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop, consistent with the CRA, the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA requires the federal banking regulators, in connection with their examinations of insured institutions, to assess the institutions’ records of meeting the credit needs of their communities, using the ratings of “outstanding,” “satisfactory,” “needs to improve,” or “substantial noncompliance,” and to take that record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by those institutions. All institutions are required to make public disclosure of their CRA performance ratings.
The Bank received a “satisfactory” rating in its last CRA examination, which was conducted during 2010.
Prompt Corrective Action.
The FDIC has broad powers to take corrective action to resolve the problems of insured depository institutions. The extent of these powers will depend upon whether the institution in question is "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized," or "critically undercapitalized." Under the regulations, an institution is considered: (A) "well capitalized" if it has (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, (ii) a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater, (iii) a leverage ratio of 5% or greater and (iv) is not subject to any order or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure; (B) "adequately capitalized" if it has (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, (ii) a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 4% or greater and (iii) a leverage ratio of 4% or greater (or 3% or greater in the case of an institution with the highest examination rating); (C)"undercapitalized" if it has (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%, (ii) a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of less than 4% or (iii) a leverage ratio of less than 4% (or 3% in the case of an institution with the highest examination rating); (D) "significantly undercapitalized" if it has (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, or (ii) a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of less than 3% or (iii) a leverage ratio of less than 3%; and (E) "critically undercapitalized" if the institution has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets equal to or less than 2%.
Changes in Control.
The BHCA prohibits the Company from acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock or substantially all of the assets of any bank or savings bank or merging or consolidating with another bank holding company or savings bank holding company without prior approval of the Federal Reserve. Similarly, Federal Reserve approval (or, in certain cases, non-disapproval) must be obtained prior to any person acquiring control of the Company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if, among other things, a person acquires more than 25% of any class of voting stock of the Company or controls in any manner the election of a majority of the directors of the Company. Control is presumed to exist if a person acquires more than 10% of any class of voting stock and the stock is registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the acquiror will be the largest shareholder after the acquisition.
Federal Securities Law
.
The Company has registered its Common Stock with the SEC pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result of such registration, the proxy and tender offer rules, insider trading reporting requirements, annual and periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act are applicable to the Company.
11
Transactions with Affiliates.
Under current federal law, depository institutions are subject to the restrictions contained in Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act with respect to loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders. Under Section 22(h), loans to directors, executive officers and shareholders who own more than 10% of a depository institution (18% in the case of institutions located in an area with less than 30,000 in population), and certain affiliated entities of any of the foregoing, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and affiliated entities, the institution's loans-to-one-borrower limit (as discussed below). Section 22(h) also prohibits loans above amounts prescribed by the appropriate federal banking agency to directors, executive officers and shareholders who own more than 10% of an institution, and their respective affiliates, unless such loans are approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the institution. Any "interested" director may not participate in the voting. The FDIC has prescribed the loan amount (which includes all other outstanding loans to such person), as to which such prior board of director approval is required, as being the greater of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus (up to $500,000). Further, pursuant to Section 22(h), the Federal Reserve requires that loans to directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions with non-executive employees of the Bank. The FDIC has imposed additional limits on the amount a bank can loan to an executive officer. The Dodd-Frank Act also enhances requirements relating to transactions with affiliates. See “The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010” included herein.
Loans to One Borrower.
The Bank is subject to the Commissioner's loans to one borrower limits which are substantially the same as those applicable to national banks. Under these limits, no loans and extensions of credit to any borrower outstanding at one time and not fully secured by readily marketable collateral shall exceed 15% of the unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus of the bank. Loans and extensions of credit fully secured by readily marketable collateral may comprise an additional 10% of unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. The Dodd-Frank Act also expands the scope of these restrictions. See “The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010” included herein.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
The federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLB Act”) dramatically changed various federal laws governing the banking, securities and insurance industries. The GLB Act has expanded opportunities for banks and bank holding companies to provide services and engage in other revenue-generating activities that previously were prohibited to them. However, this expanded authority also may present us with new challenges as our larger competitors are able to expand their services and products into areas that are not feasible for smaller, community oriented financial institutions. The GLB Act likely will have a significant economic impact on the banking industry and on competitive conditions in the financial services industry generally.
USA Patriot Act of 2001
.
The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (the “Patriot Act”). The Patriot Act is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law enforcement and the intelligence community to work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The potential impact of the Patriot Act on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. The Patriot Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and contains various regulations, including standards for verifying customer identification at account opening, and rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering.
Interstate Banking and Branching.
The Bank Holding Company Act was amended by the Interstate Banking Act. The Interstate Banking Act provides that adequately capitalized and managed financial and bank holding companies are permitted to acquire banks in any state.
State law prohibiting interstate banking or discriminating against out-of-state banks are preempted. States are not permitted to enact laws opting out of this provision; however, states are allowed to adopt a minimum age restriction requiring that target banks located within the state be in existence for a period of years, up to a maximum of five years, before a bank may be subject to the Interstate Banking Act. The Interstate Banking Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, establishes deposit caps which prohibit acquisitions that result in the acquiring company controlling 30% or more of the deposits of insured banks and thrift institutions held in the state in which the target maintains a breach or 10% or more of the deposits nationwide. States have the authority to waive the 30% deposit cap. State-level deposit caps are not preempted as long as they do not discriminate against out-of-state companies, and the federal deposit caps apply only to initial entry acquisitions.
12
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, national banks and state banks are able to establish branches in any state if that state would permit the establishment of the branch by a state bank chartered in that state. North Carolina law permits a state bank to establish a branch of the bank anywhere in the state. Accordingly, under the Dodd-Frank Act, a bank with its headquarters outside the State of North Carolina may establish branches anywhere within North Carolina.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is federal legislation issued to address accounting, corporate governance and disclosure issues. The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was wide-ranging as it applied to all public companies and imposed significant new requirements for public company governance and disclosure requirements.
In general, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandated important corporate governance and financial reporting requirements intended to enhance the accuracy and transparency of public companies’ reported financial results. It established new responsibilities for corporate chief executive officers, chief financial officers and audit committees in the financial reporting process and created a new regulatory body to oversee auditors of public companies. It backed these requirements with SEC enforcement tools, increased criminal penalties for federal mail, wire and securities fraud, and created new criminal penalties for document and record destruction in connection with federal investigations. It also increased the opportunity for more private litigation by lengthening the statute of limitations for securities fraud claims and provided federal corporate whistleblower protection.
The economic and operational effects of this legislation on public companies, including us, have been significant in terms of the time, resources and costs associated with complying with the law. Because the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, for the most part, applies equally to larger and smaller public companies, we are presented with additional challenges as a smaller, community-oriented financial institution seeking to compete with larger financial institutions in our market.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires the Company to include in its Annual Report, a report stating management’s responsibility to establish and maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting and management’s conclusion on the effectiveness of the internal controls at year end. Because the Company is a smaller reporting company, we are not required to obtain from our independent registered public accounting firm an attestation to and report on management’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting.
Government Monetary Policies and Economic Controls.
Our earnings and growth, as well as the earnings and growth of the banking industry, are affected by the credit policies of monetary authorities, including the Federal Reserve. An important function of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the national supply of bank credit in order to combat recession and curb inflationary pressures. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits, and changes in the Federal Reserve discount rate. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits, and may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve authorities have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to have such an effect in the future.
In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in money markets, as well as the effect of credit policies by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, no prediction can be made as to possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, and loan demand, or their effect on our business and earnings or on the financial condition of our various customers.
Other.
Additional regulations require annual examinations of all insured depository institutions by the appropriate federal banking agency, with some exceptions for small, well-capitalized institutions and state chartered institutions examined by state regulators. Additional regulations also establish operational and managerial, asset quality, earnings and stock valuation standards for insured depository institutions, as well as compensation standards.
The Bank is subject to examination by the FDIC and the Commissioner. In addition, the Bank is subject to various other state and federal laws and regulations, including state usury laws, laws relating to fiduciaries, consumer credit and equal credit, fair credit reporting laws and laws relating to branch banking. The Bank, as an insured North Carolina commercial bank, is prohibited from engaging as a principal in activities that are not permitted for national banks, unless (i) the FDIC determines that the activity would pose no significant risk to the appropriate deposit insurance fund and (ii) the Bank is, and continues to be, in compliance with all applicable capital standards.
Under Chapter 53 of the North Carolina General Statutes, if the capital stock of a North Carolina commercial bank is impaired by losses or otherwise, the Commissioner is authorized to require payment of the deficiency by assessment upon the bank's shareholders, pro rata, and to the extent necessary, if any such assessment is not paid by any shareholder, upon 30 days notice, to sell as much as is necessary of the stock of such shareholder to make good the deficiency.
13
The following are potential risks that management considers material and that could affect the future operating results and financial condition of the Bank and the Company. The risks are not listed in any particular order of importance, and there is the potential that there are other risks that have either not been identified or that management believed to be immaterial but which could in fact adversely affect the Bank’s operating results and financial condition.
Risks Related to Recent Economic Conditions and Governmental Response:
Recent and future legislation and regulatory initiatives to address current market and economic conditions may not achieve their intended objectives, including stabilizing the U.S. banking system or reviving the overall economy
.
Recent and future legislative and regulatory initiatives to address current market and economic conditions, such as the EESA and the ARRA, may not achieve their intended objectives, including stabilizing the U.S. banking system or reviving the overall economy. EESA was enacted in October 2008 to restore confidence and stabilize the volatility in the U.S. banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase their lending to customers and to each other. The UST and banking regulators have implemented, and likely will continue to implement, various other programs under this legislation to address capital and liquidity issues in the banking system, including the TARP, the CPP, President Obama’s Financial Stability Plan announced in February 2009, the ARRA and the FDIC’s TLGP. There can be no assurance as to the actual impact that any of the recent, or future, legislative and regulatory initiatives will have on the financial markets and the overall economy. Any failure of these initiatives to help stabilize or improve the financial markets and the economy, and a continuation or worsening of current financial market and economic conditions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to credit or the trading price of our common stock.
Additional requirements under our regulatory framework, especially those imposed under ARRA, EESA or other legislation intended to strengthen the U.S. financial system, could adversely affect us.
Recent government efforts to strengthen the U.S. financial system, including the implementation of ARRA, EESA, the TLGP and special assessments imposed by the FDIC, subject participants to additional regulatory fees and requirements, including corporate governance requirements, executive compensation restrictions, restrictions on declaring or paying dividends, restrictions on share repurchases, limits on executive compensation tax deductions and prohibitions against golden parachute payments. These requirements, and any other requirements that may be subsequently imposed, may have a material and adverse affect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The limitations on incentive compensation contained in the ARRA may adversely affect our ability to retain our highest performing employees
.
In the case of a company such as Peoples Bancorp that received CPP funds, the ARRA, and subsequent regulations issued by UST, contain restrictions on bonus and other incentive compensation payable to the Company’s senior executive officers. As a consequence, we may be unable to create a compensation structure that permits us to retain our highest performing employees and attract new employees of a high caliber. If this were to occur, our businesses and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us
.
Since mid-2007, the financial services industry as a whole, as well as the securities markets generally, have been materially and adversely affected by significant declines in the values of nearly all asset classes and by a serious lack of liquidity. Financial institutions in particular have been subject to increased volatility and an overall loss in investor confidence.
Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services companies are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, and other institutional clients.
14
From time to time, we utilize derivative financial instruments, primarily to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates, but also to hedge cash flow. By entering into these transactions and derivative instrument contracts, we expose ourselves to counterparty credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. When the fair value of a derivative contract is in an asset position, the counterparty has a liability to us, which creates credit risk for us. We attempt to minimize this risk by selecting counterparties with investment grade credit ratings, limiting our exposure to any single counterparty and regularly monitoring our market position with each counterparty. Nonetheless, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services companies, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan due us. Any such losses may not materially and adversely affect our businesses, financial condition or results of operations.
We may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments in the future.
Recent insured depository institution failures, as well as deterioration in banking and economic conditions, have significantly increased the loss provisions of the FDIC, resulting in a decline in the designated reserve ratio of the DIF to historical lows. The FDIC recently increased the designated reserve ratio from 1.25 to 2.00. In addition, the deposit insurance limit on FDIC deposit insurance coverage generally has increased to $250,000, which may result in even larger losses to the DIF. These developments have caused an increase to our assessments, and the FDIC may be required to make additional increases to the assessment rates and levy additional special assessments on us. Higher assessments increase our non-interest expense.
Since fourth quarter 2008, our annual assessment rates, which also include our assessment for participating in the FDIC’s TAGP increased from 7.04 to 15.66 basis points. Additionally, on May 22, 2009, the FDIC announced a final rule imposing a special 5.00 basis points emergency assessment as of June 30, 2009, payable September 30, 2009, based on assets minus Tier 1 Capital at June 30, 2009, but the amount of the assessment was capped at 10.00 basis points of domestic deposits. Finally, on November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a new rule requiring insured institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. We prepaid an assessment of $5.0 million, which incorporated a uniform 3.00 basis point increase effective January 1, 2011.
These higher FDIC assessment rates and special assessments have had and will continue to have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Our FDIC insurance related cost was $1.4 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, compared to $547,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. We are unable to predict the impact in future periods, including whether and when additional special assessments will occur.
Higher insurance premiums and assessments increase our costs and may limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities. We also may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased level, because financial institution failures resulting from the depressed market conditions have depleted and may continue to deplete the deposit insurance fund and reduce its ratio of reserves to insured deposits.
The full impact of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act is currently unknown given that much of the details and substance of the new laws will be implemented through agency rulemakings.
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act represents a comprehensive overhaul of the financial services industry within the United States and requires federal agencies to adopt nearly 250 new rules and conduct more than 60 studies over the course of the next few years, ensuring that the federal regulations and implementing policies in these areas will continue to develop for the foreseeable future.
Significantly, the Dodd-Frank Act includes the following provisions which affect the Company or the Bank:
(1) it establishes the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (“BCFP”) which will directly regulate and supervise the Bank for compliance with the BCFP’s regulations and policies. The creation of the BCFP will directly impact the scope and cost of products and services offered to consumers by the Bank and may have a significant effect on its financial performance.
(2) it revises the FDIC’s insurance assessment methodology so that premiums will be assessed based upon the average consolidated total assets of the Bank less tangible equity capital.
15
(3) it permanently increases deposit insurance coverage to $250,000; in addition, for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts, such accounts will receive unlimited FDIC deposit insurance through January 1, 2013.
(4) it authorizes the Federal Reserve to set debit interchange fees in an amount that is “reasonable and proportional” to the costs incurred by processors and card issuers. Notably, a proposed Federal Reserve rule that would limit this interchange fee to 12 cents per transaction has been announced but has not yet been finalized.
(5) it imposes proprietary trading restrictions on insured depository institutions and their holding companies that prohibit them from engaging in proprietary trading except in limited circumstances, and prevents them from owning equity interests in excess of three percent (3%) of a bank’s Tier 1 capital in private equity and hedge funds.
(6) it requires a phased-in exclusion of trust preferred securities as a component of Tier 1 capital for certain bank holding companies. Notably, preferred stock issued to the UST under the CPP is excluded from this calculation.
(7) it requires federal regulators to establish new minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements for large banks, bank holding companies and systemically important non-banks. The federal banking agencies issued a proposal to implement this authority whereby the capital requirements applied to other insured depository institutions would not apply to the largest insured depository institutions, which had previously been permitted to use their own models to determine their individual risk-based capital requirements. Finally, the Dodd-Frank Act requires depository institution holding companies to act as a “source of strength” for their depository institution subsidiaries (previously, this had been a regulatory policy but was not codified into law).
Based on the text of the Dodd-Frank Act and the anticipated implementing regulations, including the Durbin amendment, it is anticipated that the costs to banks and their holding companies may increase or fee income may decrease significantly which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. Moreover, compliance obligations will expose us to additional noncompliance risk and could divert management’s focus from the business of banking.
The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection may reshape the consumer financial laws through rulemaking and enforcement of the prohibitions against unfair, deceptive and abusive business practices, which may directly impact the business operations of depository institutions offering consumer financial products or services, including the Bank.
The BCFP has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer to consumers covered financial products and services. The BCFP has also been directed to write rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. The concept of what may be considered to be an “abusive” practice is new under the law. The full scope of the impact of this authority has not yet been determined as the implementing rules of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to the BCFP have not yet been released. Moreover, the Bank will be supervised and examined by the BCFP for compliance with the BCFP’s regulations and policies. The costs and limitations related to this additional regulatory reporting regimen have yet to be fully determined, although they may be material and the limitations and restrictions that will be placed upon the Bank with respect to its consumer product offering and services will also likely produce significant, material effects on the Bank’s (and the Company’s) profitability.
Risks Related to Our Business:
Loss of key personnel could adversely impact results.
The success of the Bank has been and will continue to be greatly influenced by the ability to retain the services of existing senior management. The Bank has benefited from consistency within its senior management team, with its top five executives averaging over 17 years of service with the Bank. The Company has entered into employment contracts with each of these top management officials. Nevertheless, the unexpected loss of the services of any of the key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse impact on the business and financial results of the Bank.
A significant amount of the Bank’s business is concentrated in lending which is secured by property located in the Catawba Valley and surrounding areas.
In addition to the financial strength and cash flow characteristics of the borrower in each case, the Bank often secures its loans with real estate collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. If the Bank is required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan during a period of reduced real estate values, as is currently the case, to satisfy the debt, the Bank’s earnings and capital could be adversely affected.
16
Additionally, with most of the Bank’s loans concentrated in the Catawba Valley and surrounding areas, a decline in local economic conditions could adversely affect the values of the Bank’s real estate collateral. Consequently, a decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on the Bank’s earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of larger financial institutions whose real estate loan portfolios are geographically diverse.
An inadequate allowance for loan losses would reduce our earnings.
The risk of credit losses on loans varies with, among other things, general economic conditions, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan and, in the case of a collateralized loan, the value and marketability of the collateral for the loan. Management maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon, among other things, historical experience, an evaluation of economic conditions and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality. Considering such factors, management makes various assumptions and judgments about the ultimate collectability of the loan portfolio and provides an allowance for loan losses based upon a percentage of the outstanding balances within assigned risk grades and for specific loans when their ultimate collectability is considered questionable. If management’s assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect and the allowance for loan losses is inadequate to absorb future losses, or if the bank regulatory authorities require the Bank to increase the allowance for loan losses as a part of their examination process, the Bank’s earnings and capital could be significantly and adversely affected. For further discussion related to our process for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, see “Allowance for Loan Losses” within “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results and Operation” of this Annual Report, which is included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit 13.
Changes in interest rates affect profitability and assets.
Changes in prevailing interest rates may hurt the Bank’s business. The Bank derives its income primarily from the difference or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. In general, the larger the spread, the more the Bank earns. When market rates of interest change, the interest the Bank receives on its assets and the interest the Bank pays on its liabilities will fluctuate. This can cause decreases in the “spread” and can adversely affect the Bank’s income. Changes in market interest rates could reduce the value of the Bank’s financial assets. Fixed-rate investments, mortgage-backed and related securities and mortgage loans generally decrease in value as interest rates rise. In addition, interest rates affect how much money the Bank lends. For example, when interest rates rise, the cost of borrowing increases and the loan originations tend to decrease. If the Bank is unsuccessful in managing the effects of changes in interest rates, the financial condition and results of operations could suffer.
We measure interest rate risk under various rate scenarios using specific criteria and assumptions. A summary of this process, along with the results of our net interest income simulations is presented within “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of this Annual Report which is included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit 13.
The Company’s business may be adversely affected by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions.
Since December 2007, business activity across a wide range of industries and regions has been greatly reduced and local governments and many businesses are in serious difficulty due to the lack of consumer spending and the lack of liquidity in the credit markets. Unemployment has increased significantly since that time.
During these challenging economic conditions, the financial services industry and the securities markets generally were materially and adversely affected by significant declines in the values of nearly all asset classes and by a serious lack of liquidity. This was initially triggered by declines in home prices and the values of subprime mortgages, but spread to all mortgage and real estate asset classes, to leveraged bank loans and to nearly all asset classes, including equities. The global markets have been characterized by substantially increased volatility and short-selling and an overall loss of investor confidence, initially in financial institutions, but more recently in companies in a number of other industries and in the broader markets.
Market conditions have also led to the failure or merger of a number of prominent financial institutions. Financial institution failures or near-failures have resulted in further losses as a consequence of defaults on securities issued by them and defaults under contracts entered into with such entities as counterparties. Furthermore, declining asset values, defaults on mortgages and consumer loans, and the lack of market and investor confidence, as well as other factors, have all combined to increase credit default swap spreads, to cause rating agencies to lower credit ratings, and to otherwise increase the cost and decrease the availability of liquidity, despite very significant declines in Federal Reserve
17
borrowing rates and other government actions. Some banks and other lenders have suffered significant losses and have become reluctant to lend, even on a secured basis, due to the increased risk of default and the impact of declining asset values on the value of collateral. The foregoing has significantly weakened the strength and liquidity of some financial institutions worldwide. In 2008, the U.S. government, the Federal Reserve and other regulators took numerous steps to increase liquidity and to restore investor confidence, including investing approximately $200 billion in the equity of other banking organizations, but asset values continue to decline and access to liquidity continues to be limited.
The Company’s financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, is highly dependent upon on the business environment in the markets where the Company operates, in the State of North Carolina and in the United States as a whole. A favorable business environment is generally characterized by, among other factors, economic growth, efficient capital markets, low inflation, high business and investor confidence, and strong business earnings. Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can be caused by: declines in economic growth, business activity or investor or business confidence; limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital; increases in inflation or interest rates; natural disasters; or a combination of these or other factors.
Overall, during 2009 and 2010, the business environment has been adverse for many households and businesses in the United States and worldwide. It is expected that the business environment in the State of North Carolina will continue to have an adverse impact on many households and businesses for the foreseeable future. Such conditions could adversely affect the credit quality of the Company’s loans, results of operations and financial condition.
The Bank faces strong competition from other banks and financial institutions which can hurt its business.
The financial services industry is highly competitive. The Bank competes against commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banks, brokerage firms, investment advisory firms, insurance companies and other financial institutions. Many of these entities are larger organizations with significantly greater financial, management and other resources than the Bank has. Moreover, one national money center commercial bank is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, only 40 miles from the Bank's primary market area.
While management believes it can and does successfully compete with other financial institutions in our market, we may face a competitive disadvantage as a result of our smaller size and lack of geographic diversification.
Changes in technology may impact the Bank’s business.
The Bank uses various technologies in its business and the banking industry is undergoing rapid technological changes. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. The Bank’s future success will depend in part on its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as create additional efficiencies in the Bank’s operations. The Bank’s competitors may have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements.
We may be subject to examinations by taxing authorities which could adversely affect our results of operations.
In the normal course of business, we may be subject to examinations from federal and state taxing authorities regarding the amount of taxes due in connection with investments we have made and the businesses in which we are engaged. Recently, federal and state taxing authorities have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by financial institutions. The challenges made by taxing authorities may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. If any such challenges are made and are not resolved in our favor, they could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards could materially affect how we report our financial results and condition.
Our accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our financial results and condition. Some of these policies require use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Some of our accounting policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions.
From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards or the interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of our external financial statements. These changes are beyond our control, can be hard to predict and could materially impact how we report our results of operations and financial condition. We could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in our restating prior period financial statements in material amounts.
18
Our internal controls may be ineffective.
Management regularly reviews and updates our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Impairment of investment securities or deferred tax assets could require charges to earnings, which could result in a negative impact on our results of operations.
In assessing the impairment of investment securities, management considers the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issues, and the intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value in the near term. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The impact of each of these impairment matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business infrastructure.
Third party vendors provide key components of our business infrastructure such as internet connections, network access and core application processing. While we have selected these third party vendors carefully, we do not control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including as a result of their not providing us their services for any reason or their performing their services poorly, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our customers and otherwise to conduct our business. Replacing these third party vendors could also entail significant delay and expense.
Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure, interruption, or breach in security or operational integrity of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan, and other systems. We have policies and procedures designed with the intention to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption, or security breach of our information systems.. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Liquidity is essential to our businesses.
Our liquidity could be impaired by an inability to access the capital markets or unforeseen outflows of cash. This situation may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as a general market disruption or an operational problem that affects third parties or us. Our credit ratings are important to our liquidity. A reduction in our credit ratings could adversely affect our liquidity and competitive position, increase our borrowing costs, limit our access to the capital markets or trigger unfavorable contractual obligations.
Negative publicity could damage our reputation
Reputation risk, or the risk to our earnings and capital from negative public opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative public opinion could adversely affect our ability to keep and attract customers and expose us to adverse legal and regulatory consequences. Negative public opinion could result from our actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions, and disclosure, sharing or inadequate protection of customer information, and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to that conduct.
Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, we may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports, and other financial information. We may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties, or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, financial advisors and consultants, credit reports, or other financial information could cause us to enter into unfavorable transactions, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
19
If our non-performing assets increase, our earnings will suffer.
At December 31, 2010, our non-performing assets (which consist of non-accruing loans, loans 90+ days delinquent, and foreclosed real estate assets) totaled $46.9 million, or 4.40 % of total assets, which is an increase of $18.2 million or 63% over non-performing assets at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, our non-performing assets were $14.2 million, or 1.47% of total assets. Our non-performing assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or real estate owned. We must reserve for probable losses, which is established through a current period charge to the provision for loan losses as well as from time to time, as appropriate, the write down the value of properties in our other real estate owned portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs such as taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our other real estate owned. Further, the resolution of non-performing assets requires the active involvement of management, which can distract them from more profitable activity. Finally, if our estimate for the recorded allowance for loan losses proves to be incorrect and our allowance is inadequate, we will have to increase the allowance accordingly.
Our loan portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss.
We originate commercial real estate loans, acquisition, development and construction (“AD&C”) loans, and residential mortgage loans primarily within our market area. Commercial real estate, commercial, and AD&C loans tend to involve larger loan balances to a single borrower or groups of related borrowers and are most susceptible to a risk of loss during a downturn in the business cycle. These loans also have historically had greater credit risk than other loans for the following reasons:
|
·
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans.
Repayment is dependent on income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service. These loans also involve greater risk because they are generally not fully amortizing over a loan period, but rather have a balloon payment due at maturity. A borrower’s ability to make a balloon payment typically will depend on being able to either refinance the loan or timely sell the underlying property. As of December 31, 2010, commercial real estate loans, including multi-family loans, comprised approximately 29% of our total loan portfolio.
|
|
·
|
Commercial Loans.
Repayment is generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business. In addition, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, be difficult to appraise, be illiquid, or fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. As of December 31, 2010, commercial loans comprised approximately 8% of our total loan portfolio.
|
|
·
|
AD&C Loans.
The risk of loss is largely dependent on our initial estimate of whether the property’s value at completion equals or exceeds the cost of property construction and the availability of take-out financing. During the construction phase, a number of factors can result in delays or cost overruns. If our estimate is inaccurate or if actual construction costs exceed estimates, the value of the property securing our loan may be insufficient to ensure full repayment when completed through a permanent loan, sale of the property, or by seizure of collateral. As of December 31, 2010, AD&C loans comprised approximately 17% of our total loan portfolio.
|
|
·
|
Consumer Loans.
Consumer loans (such as personal lines of credit) are collateralized, if at all, with assets that may not provide an adequate source of payment of the loan due to depreciation, damage, or loss. As of December 31, 2010, consumer loans comprised approximately 5% of our total loan portfolio.
|
Because we engage in lending secured by real estate and may be forced to foreclose on the collateral property and own the underlying real estate, we may be subject to the increased costs associated with the ownership of real property, which could result in reduced net income.
Since we originate loans secured by real estate, we may have to foreclose on the collateral property to protect our investment and may thereafter own and operate such property, in which case we are exposed to the risks inherent in the ownership of real estate.
20
The amount that we, as a mortgagee, may realize after a default is dependent upon factors outside of our control, including, but not limited to:
|
·
|
general or local economic conditions;
|
|
·
|
environmental cleanup liability;
|
|
·
|
neighborhood values;
|
|
·
|
interest rates;
|
|
·
|
real estate tax rates;
|
|
·
|
operating expenses of the mortgaged properties;
|
|
·
|
supply of and demand for rental units or properties;
|
|
·
|
ability to obtain and maintain adequate occupancy of the properties;
|
|
·
|
zoning laws;
|
|
·
|
governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies; and
|
|
·
|
acts of God.
|
Certain expenditures associated with the ownership of real estate, principally real estate taxes and maintenance costs, may adversely affect the income from the real estate. Therefore, the cost of operating real property may exceed the rental income earned from such property, and we may have to advance funds in order to protect our investment or we may be required to dispose of the real property at a loss.
Our allowance for loan losses may be insufficient
.
All borrowers carry the potential to default and our remedies to recover (seizure and/or sale of collateral, legal actions, guarantees, etc.) may not fully satisfy money previously lent. We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of probable credit losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance for loan losses reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; present economic, political, and regulatory conditions; and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of additional loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. An increase in the allowance for loan losses results in a decrease in net income, and possibly risk-based capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock:
The trading volume in our common stock is less than that of larger public companies which can cause price volatility.
The trading history of our common stock has been characterized by relatively low trading volume. The value of a shareholder’s investment may be subject to sudden decreases due to the volatility of the price of our common stock, which trades on the NASDAQ Global Market.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and subject to fluctuations in response to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the factors discussed in other risk factors and the following:
|
·
|
actual or anticipated fluctuation in our operating results;
|
|
·
|
changes in interest rates;
|
|
·
|
changes in the legal or regulatory environment in which we operate;
|
|
·
|
press releases, announcements or publicity relating to us or our competitors or relating to trends in our industry;
|
|
·
|
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts and investors;
|
|
·
|
future sales of our common stock;
|
|
·
|
changes in economic conditions in our market, general conditions in the U.S. economy, financial markets or the banking industry; and
|
|
·
|
other developments affecting our competitors or us.
|
These factors may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance, and could prevent a shareholder from selling common stock at or above the current market price.
21
We may not be able to pay dividends in the future in accordance with past practice.
We have in the past paid a quarterly dividend to shareholders. However, we are dependent primarily upon the Bank for our earnings and funds to pay dividends on our common stock. The payment of dividends also is subject to legal and regulatory restrictions. Any payment of dividends in the future will depend, in large part, on the Bank’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by our Board of Directors.
Under the terms of the CPP, the UST has a preferential right to the payment of cumulative dividends on the CPP Series A preferred stock. No dividends are permitted to be paid to common shareholders unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods on the CPP preferred stock were fully paid. Any increase in dividends to common shareholders above the amount last declared prior to December 23, 2008 ($0.12 per share quarterly in the case of the Company) is subject to the consent of the UST for the first three years of the CPP preferred stock investment.
Our stock price can be volatile
.
Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. Our stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
|
·
|
actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations;
|
|
·
|
recommendations by securities analysts;
|
|
·
|
operating results and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
|
|
·
|
news reports relating to trends, concerns, and other issues in the financial services industry;
|
|
·
|
perceptions in the marketplace regarding us and/or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
new technology used or services offered by competitors;
|
|
·
|
significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments by or involving us or our competitors; and
|
|
·
|
changes in government regulations.
|
The Company’s trading volume has been low compared with larger national and regional banks
.
The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market. However, the trading volume of the Company’s common stock is relatively low when compared with more seasoned companies listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market, NASDAQ Global Select Market, or other consolidated reporting systems or stock exchanges. Thus, the market in the Company’s common stock may be limited in scope relative to other larger companies. In addition, the Company cannot say with any certainty that a more active and liquid trading market for its common stock will develop.
Our common stock is not FDIC insured.
The Company’s common stock is not a savings or deposit account or other obligation of any bank and is not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency and is subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this report and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, holders of our common stock may lose some or all of their investment.
Our participation in the CPP imposes restrictions and obligations on us that limit our ability to increase dividends, repurchase shares of our common stock and access the equity capital markets
.
On December 23, 2008, we issued and sold (i) 25,054 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and (ii) a warrant to purchase 357,234 shares of our common stock (“Warrant”) to the UST as part of its CPP. Prior to December 23, 2011, unless we have redeemed all of the Series A Preferred Stock or the UST has transferred all of the Series A Preferred Stock to a third party, the Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which such securities were sold, among other things, limits the payment of dividends on our common stock to a maximum quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share without prior regulatory approval, limits our ability to repurchase shares of our common stock (with certain exceptions, including the repurchase of our common stock to offset share dilution from equity-based compensation awards), and grants the holders of such securities certain registration rights which, in certain circumstances, impose lock-up periods during which we would be unable to issue equity securities. In addition, unless we are able to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock during the first five years, the dividends on this capital will increase substantially at that point, from 5% to 9%. Depending on market conditions at the time, this increase in dividends could significantly impact our liquidity.
22
We may reduce or eliminate dividends on our common stock.
Although we have historically paid a quarterly cash dividend to the holders of our common stock, holders of our common stock are not entitled to receive dividends. Downturns in the domestic and global economies could cause our board of directors to consider, among other things, reducing or eliminating of dividends paid on our common stock. This could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Because of our agreements with the UST as part of the CPP under the TARP, prior to December 23, 2011, or the date on which the UST’s senior preferred stock investment has been fully redeemed or transferred, if earlier, we may not pay quarterly dividends on our common stock greater than $0.12 per share without the UST’s consent. In addition, we may not pay dividends on our common stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods are fully paid on our outstanding preferred stock issued to the UST. Furthermore, as a bank holding company, our ability to pay dividends is subject to the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends before declaring or paying any dividends. Dividends also may be limited as a result of safety and soundness considerations.
Our articles of incorporation, as amended, amended and restated bylaws, and certain banking laws may have an anti-takeover effect.
Provisions of our articles of incorporation, as amended, amended and restated bylaws, and federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial to our shareholders. The combination of these provisions may prohibit a non-negotiated merger or other business combination, which, in turn, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Not applicable.
23
At December 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank conducted their business from the headquarters office in Newton, North Carolina, its Banco administrative office and its 22 other branch offices in Lincolnton, Hickory, Newton, Catawba, Conover, Claremont, Maiden, Denver, Triangle, Hiddenite, Charlotte, Monroe, Cornelius, Mooresville and Raleigh, North Carolina. The Bank also operates a loan production office in Denver, North Carolina. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank's properties at December 31, 2010.
|
Owned
Corporate Office
518 West C Street
Newton, North Carolina 28658
420 West A Street
Newton, North Carolina 28658
2619 North Main Avenue
Newton, North Carolina 28658
213 1st Street, West
Conover, North Carolina 28613
3261 East Main Street
Claremont, North Carolina 28610
6125 Highway 16 South
Denver, North Carolina 28037
5153 N.C. Highway 90E
Hiddenite, North Carolina 28636
200 Island Ford Road
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
3310 Springs Road NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
142 South Highway 16
Denver, North Carolina 28037
106 North Main Street
Catawba, North Carolina 28609
2050 Catawba Valley Boulevard
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
800 E. Arrowood Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
1074 River Highway
Mooresville, NC, 28117
|
Leased
1333 2nd Street NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
1910 East Main Street
Lincolnton, North Carolina 28092
760 Highway 27 West
Lincolnton, North Carolina 28092
102 Leonard Avenue
Newton, North Carolina 28658
6300 South Boulevard
Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
4451 Central Avenue
Suite A
Charlotte, North Carolina 28205
3752/3754 Highway 16 North
Denver, North Carolina 28037
501 West Roosevelt Boulevard
Monroe, NC 28110
9624-I Bailey Road
Cornelius, North Carolina 28031
4011 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
125-E Trade Court
Mooresville, NC 28117
|
In the opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any material pending legal proceedings other than routine proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business.
24
EQUITY SECURITIES
Peoples Bancorp common stock is traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) market and quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market, under the symbol “PEBK.” Market makers for the Company’s shares include Scott and Stringfellow, Inc. and Sterne Agee & Leach.
Although the payment of dividends by the Company is subject to certain requirements and limitations of North Carolina corporate law, neither the Commissioner nor the FDIC have promulgated any regulations specifically limiting the right of the Company to pay dividends and repurchase shares. However, the ability of the Company to pay dividends and repurchase shares may be dependent upon the Company’s receipt of dividends from the Bank. The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is limited. North Carolina commercial banks, such as the Bank, are subject to legal limitations on the amounts of dividends they are permitted to pay. Dividends may be paid by the Bank from undivided profits, which are determined by deducting and charging certain items against actual profits, including any contributions to surplus required by North Carolina law. Also, an insured depository institution, such as the Bank, is prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become “undercapitalized” (as such term is defined in the applicable law and regulations). Based on its current financial condition, the Bank does not expect that this provision will have any impact on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends. Due to the Company’s participation in the CPP, the full dividend for the latest completed CPP dividend period must be declared and paid in full before dividends may be paid to common shareholders and UST approval is required for any increase in common dividends per share. See Supervision and Regulation under Item 1 Business.
As of March 17, 2011, the Company had 719 shareholders of record, not including the number of persons or entities
whose stock is held in nominee or street name through various brokerage firms or banks. The market price for the Company’s common stock was
$6.99
on March 17, 2011.
The following table presents certain market and dividend information for the last two fiscal years. Over-the-counter quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
|
Market and Dividend Data
|
||||||
|
Cash Dividend
|
||||||
|
2010
|
Low Bid
|
High Bid
|
Per Common Share
|
|||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 4.51 | 6.26 | 0.02 | ||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 4.80 | 7.84 | 0.02 | ||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 4.48 | 5.50 | 0.02 | ||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 4.46 | 6.12 | 0.02 | ||
|
Cash Dividend
|
||||||
|
2009
|
Low Bid
|
High Bid
|
Per Common Share
|
|||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 4.81 | 10.00 | 0.10 | ||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 5.00 | 7.46 | 0.07 | ||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 5.93 | 7.00 | 0.07 | ||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 3.95 | 6.84 | 0.02 | ||
25
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the Company’s cumulative shareholder return on its Common Stock with a NASDAQ index and with a southeastern bank index. The graph was prepared by SNL Securities, L.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, using data as of December 31, 2010.
COMPARISON OF SIX-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURNS
Performance Report for
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
26
The information required by Item 201(d) concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is set forth in Item 12 hereof
.
|
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total | |||||||||||||||
| Number of | |||||||||||||||
| Shares | |||||||||||||||
| Purchased as | |||||||||||||||
|
|
Maximum Number | ||||||||||||||
| Total | Publicly | of Shares that May | |||||||||||||
| Number of | Average | Announced | Yet Be Purchased | ||||||||||||
| Shares | Price Paid | Plans or | Under the Plans or | ||||||||||||
| Period | Purchased | per Share | Programs | Programs | |||||||||||
|
January 1 - 31, 2010
|
- | $ | - | - | - | ||||||||||
|
February 1 - 28, 2010
|
2,000 | 5.27 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
March 1 - 31, 2010
|
1,310 | 5.43 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
April 1 - 30, 2010
|
2,460 | 7.27 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
May 1 - 31, 2010
|
2,060 | 6.41 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
June 1 - 30, 2010
|
- | - | - | - | |||||||||||
|
July 1 - 31, 2010
|
- | - | - | - | |||||||||||
|
August 1 - 31, 2010
|
2,590 | 5.01 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
September 1 - 30, 2010
|
5,285 | 5.11 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
October 1 - 31, 2010
|
- | - | - | - | |||||||||||
|
November 1 - 30, 2010
|
2,450 | 5.11 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
December 1 - 31, 2010
|
1,340 | 5.13 | - | - | |||||||||||
|
Total
|
19,495 |
(1)
|
$ | 5.55 | - | ||||||||||
|
(1) The Company purchased 19,945 shares on the open market in 2010 for its deferred compensation plan. All purchases were funded by participant contributions to the plan. The Securities Purchase Agreement with UST under the CPP program allow the Company to purchase its common stock on the open market pursuant to benefit plans.
|
|||||||||||||||
The information required by this Item is set forth in the table captioned "Selected Financial Data" on page A-3 of the Annual Report, which table is included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit (13).
The information required by this Item is set forth in the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on pages
A-4 through A-28
of the Annual Report, which section is included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit (13).
The information required by this Item is set forth in the section captioned “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” on
page A-27
of the Annual Report, which section is included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit (13).
27
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and supplementary data set forth on pages
A-29 through A-63
of the Annual Report, which is included in this Form 10-K as Exhibit (13).
Not applicable.
28
The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has concluded, based on their evaluation
as of the end of the period covered by this Report,
that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13A-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.
|
/s/ Tony W. Wolfe
|
/s/ A. Joseph Lampron, Jr.
|
||
|
Tony W. Wolfe
|
A. Joseph Lampron, Jr.
|
||
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
March 25, 2011
|
March 25
,
2011
|
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
None
29
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The information required by this Item regarding directors and executive officers of the Company is set forth under the sections captioned “Nominees”, “Our Board of Directors and Its Committees”; “Executive Committee”, “Governance Committee”, “Audit and Risk Management Committee”, “Compensation Committee”, “Board Leadership and Structure and Risk Oversight” contained in the Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set forth under the section captioned “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” contained in the Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item regarding identification of members of the Company’s Audit Committee is set forth under the section captioned “Audit and Risk Management Committee” contained in the Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s employees, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer. The Company has also adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is reviewed annually, and amended as needed, by the Committee. These documents are available on the Bank’s website (www.peoplesbanknc.com) under “Investor Relations.”
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this Item is set forth under the sections captioned “Executive Compensation and Benefits” contained in the Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
For the information required by the Item see the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” contained in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table presents the number of shares of Company common stock to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights; the weighted-average price of the outstanding options, warrants and rights and the number of options, warrants and rights remaining that may be issued under the Company’s Omnibus Plan described under the section captioned “Omnibus Stock Option and Long Term Incentive Plan” contained in the Proxy Statement .
30
|
Plan Category
|
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding option,
warrants and rights (1),
(2)
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(3)
|
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
column (a)) (4)
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
153,821
|
$8.25
|
360,000
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total
|
153,821
|
$8.25
|
360,000
|
|
(1) Includes 150,071 stock options issued under the 1999 Omnibus Plan, which are fully vested as of December 31, 2010. Of the outstanding stock options, options to purchase a total of 63,544 options were granted on October 30, 2001; 7,510 options were granted on December 18, 2001; 72,966 options were granted on December 17, 2002; 3,630 options were granted on May 6, 2004; and 2,421 options were granted on December 16, 2004.
|
|||
|
(2) Includes 1,750 shares of restricted stock granted on March 20, 2008 and 2,000 shares of restricted stock granted on November 20, 2008 under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. These restricted stock grants cliff vest three years after issuance.
|
|||
|
(3) The exercise prices for the grants of stock options under the 1999 Omnibus Plan on October 30, 2001; December 18, 2001; December 17, 2002; May 6, 2004 and December 16, 2004 are: $8.78; $8.10; $7.77; $10.31; and $10.57, respectively. All prices and shares have been adjusted for the 10% stock dividends paid March 16, 2005 and June 16, 2006 and the three-for-two stock split paid June 15, 2007. The exercise price used for the grants of restricted stock is $5.25, the closing price for the Company’s stock on December 31, 2010.
|
|||
|
(4) Reflects shares authorized under the February 19, 2009 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan. No shares have been issued under this plan as of December 31, 2010.
|
|||
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
See the section captioned “Indebtedness of and Transactions with Management and Directors” contained in the Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
See the section captioned “Proposal 3 - Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditor” contained in the Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
31
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
||
|
15(a)1.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements (contained in the Annual Report attached hereto as Exhibit (13)
|
||
|
and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
|
(a)
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | ||
|
(b)
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 | ||
|
(c)
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
||
|
(d)
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended
|
||
| December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 | |||
|
(e)
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31,
|
||
| 2010, 2009 and 2008 | |||
|
(f)
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009
|
||
| and 2008 | |||
|
(g)
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | ||
|
15(a)2.
|
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
|
||
|
All schedules have been omitted, as the required information is either inapplicable or included in
|
|||
|
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|||
|
15(a)3.
|
Exhibits
|
||
|
Exhibit (3)(1)
|
Articles of Amendment dated December 19, 2008, regarding the Series A Preferred
|
|
|
Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(1) to the Form 8-K filed with the
|
||
|
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (3)(2)
|
Articles of Amendment
dated February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to
|
|
|
Exhibit (3)(2) to the Form 10
-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on March 25, 2010
|
||
|
Exhibit (3)(i)
|
Articles of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc., incorporated
|
|
|
by reference to Exhibit (3)(i) to the Form 8-A filed with the Securities and
|
||
|
Exchange Commission on September 2, 1999
|
||
|
Exhibit (3)(ii)
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
|
|
|
incorporated by reference to
Exhibit
(3)(ii) to
the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
|
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2010
|
||
|
Exhibit (4)
|
Specimen Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) to the Form
|
|
|
8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 1999
|
||
|
Exhibit (4)(1)
|
Form of Certificate for the Series A Preferred Stock, incorporated by
|
|
|
reference to Exhibit (4)(1) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
|
||
|
Exchange Commission on December 29, 2008
|
32
| Exhibit (4)(2) | Warrant dated December 23, 2008, for the purchase of shares of Common Stock, | |
| incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(2) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities | ||
| and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2008 | ||
|
Exhibit (10)(1)
|
Letter Agreement dated December 23, 2008 between the Registrant and the United
|
|
|
States Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(1) to
|
||
|
the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
|
||
|
2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(a)(i)
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated December 23, 2008 between Peoples Bancorp
|
|
|
of North Carolina, Inc. and Tony W. Wolfe, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
|
||
|
(10)(a)(i) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
|
||
|
December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(a)(ii)
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Peoples Bank and Tony W. Wolfe
|
|
|
dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(a)(ii) to the
|
||
|
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
|
||
|
2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(a)(iii)
|
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
|
|
|
Bank and Tony W. Wolfe dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by reference to
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(a)(iii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(b)(i)
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated December 23, 2008 between Peoples Bancorp
|
|
|
of North Carolina, Inc. and Joseph F. Beaman, Jr., incorporated by reference to
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(b)(i) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(b)(ii)
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Peoples Bank and Joseph F.
|
|
|
Beaman, Jr. dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
|
||
|
(10)(b)(ii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
|
||
|
December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(b)(iii)
|
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
|
|
|
Bank and Joseph F. Beaman, Jr. dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by
|
||
|
reference to Exhibit (10)(b)(iii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
|
||
|
Exchange Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(c)(i)
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated December 23, 2008 between Peoples Bancorp
|
|
|
of North Carolina, Inc. and William D. Cable, Sr., incorporated by reference to
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(c)(i) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(c)(ii)
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Peoples Bank and William D.
|
|
|
Cable, Sr. dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
|
||
|
(10)(c)(ii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
|
||
|
December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(c)(iii)
|
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
|
|
|
Bank and William D. Cable, Sr. dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by
|
||
|
reference to Exhibit (10)(c)(iii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
|
||
|
Exchange Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10
)(d)(i
)
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated December 23, 2008 between Peoples Bancorp
|
|
|
of North Carolina, Inc. and Lance A. Sellers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
|
||
|
(10)(d)(i) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
|
||
|
December 29, 2008
|
33
| Exhibit (10)(d)(ii) | Amendment to Employment Agreement between Peoples Bank and Lance A. | |
| Sellers dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(d)(ii) to | ||
| the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, | ||
| 2008 | ||
|
Exhibit (10)(d)(iii)
|
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
|
|
|
Bank and Lance A. Sellers dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by reference to
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(d)(iii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(e)
|
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term
|
|
|
Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f) to the Form 10-K filed
|
||
|
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(e)(i)
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock
|
|
|
Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit
|
||
|
(10)(e)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
|
||
|
March 15, 2007
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(f)(i)
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated December 23, 2008 between Peoples Bancorp
|
|
|
of North Carolina, Inc. and A. Joseph Lampron, Jr., incorporated by reference to
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(f)(i) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(f)(ii)
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Peoples Bank and A. Joseph
|
|
|
Lampron, Jr. dated March 18, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f)(ii)
|
||
|
to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
|
||
|
25, 2010
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(f)(iii)
|
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
|
|
|
Bank and A. Joseph Lampron, Jr. dated December 18, 2008, incorporated by reference
|
||
|
to Exhibit (10)(f)(iii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(g)
|
Peoples Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral Plan, incorporated by reference to
|
|
|
Exhibit (10)(h) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(h)
|
Rabbi Trust for the Peoples Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral Plan,
|
|
|
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
|
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(i)
|
Description of Service Recognition Program maintained by Peoples Bank,
|
|
|
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
|
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(j)
|
Capital Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006, by and among
|
|
|
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc., PEBK Capital Trust II and Bear, Sterns
|
||
|
Securities Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(j) to the Form 10-Q filed
|
||
|
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2006
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(k)
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of PEBK Capital Trust II, dated as of June
|
|
|
28, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(k) to the Form 10-Q filed with
|
||
|
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2006
|
34
| Exhibit (10)(l) | Guarantee Agreement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. dated as of June | |
| 28, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(1) to the Form 10-Q filed with | ||
| the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2006 | ||
|
Exhibit (10)(m)
|
Indenture, dated as of June 28, 2006, by and between Peoples Bancorp of North
|
|
|
Carolina, Inc. and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to Junior
|
||
|
Subordinated Debt Securities Due September 15, 2036, incorporated by reference to
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(m) to the Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
|
||
|
Commission on November 13, 2006
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(n)
|
Form of Amended and Restated Director Supplemental Retirement Agreement
|
|
|
between Peoples Bank and Directors Robert C. Abernethy, James S. Abernethy,
|
||
|
Douglas S. Howard, John W. Lineberger, Jr., Gary E. Matthews, Dr. Billy L. Price,
|
||
|
Jr., Larry E. Robinson, W. Gregory Terry, Dan Ray Timmerman, Sr. and Benjamin
|
||
|
I. Zachary, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(n) to the Form 8-K filed with
|
||
|
the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (10)(o)
|
2009 Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long
|
|
|
Term Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(o) to the Form 10-K
|
||
|
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2009
|
||
|
Exhibit (11)
|
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings
|
|
|
Exhibit (12)
|
Statement regarding computation of ratios
|
|
|
Exhibit (13)
|
2010 Annual Report of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
|
|
|
Exhibit (14)
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.,
|
|
|
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (14) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
|
||
|
and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005
|
||
|
Exhibit (21)
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
Exhibit (23)
|
Consent of Porter Keadle Moore, LLP
|
|
|
Exhibit (31)(a)
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-
|
|
|
Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
|
Exhibit (31)(b)
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-
|
|
|
Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
|
Exhibit (32)
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
|
|
|
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
|
Exhibit (99)(a)
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 111 of the
|
|
|
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
|
||
|
Exhibit (99)(b)
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 111 of the
|
|
|
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
|
35
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
|
||
|
(Registrant)
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ Tony W. Wolfe
|
|
|
Tony W. Wolfe
|
||
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
Date: March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
||||
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
|
/s/ Tony W. Wolfe
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Tony W. Wolfe
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|||
|
/s/ James S. Abernethy
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
James S. Abernethy
|
||||
|
/s/ Robert C. Abernethy
|
Chairman of the Board and Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Robert C. Abernethy
|
||||
|
/s/ Douglas S. Howard
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Douglas S. Howard
|
||||
|
/s/ A. Joseph Lampron, Jr.
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
A. Joseph Lampron, Jr.
|
Financial Officer (Principal Financial
|
|||
|
and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
||||
|
/s/ John W. Lineberger, Jr.
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
John W. Lineberger, Jr.
|
|
|||
|
/s/ Gary E. Matthews
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Gary E. Matthews
|
||||
|
/s/ Billy L. Price, Jr., M.D.
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Billy L. Price, Jr., M.D.
|
||||
|
/s/ Larry E. Robinson
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Larry E. Robinson
|
||||
|
/s/ William Gregory Terry
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
William Gregory Terry
|
||||
|
/s/ Dan Ray Timmerman, Sr.
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Dan Ray Timmerman, Sr.
|
||||
|
/s/ Benjamin I. Zachary
|
Director
|
March 25, 2011
|
||
|
Benjamin I. Zachary
|
||||
36
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. [removed and Reserved]Part IIItem 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases OfPart OfItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9a(t). Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules