PLPC 10-Q Quarter ended March 31, 2015

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

Commission file number: 0-31164

Preformed Line Products Company

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(440) 461-5200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x

The number of common shares outstanding as of May 1, 2015: 5,393,371.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

3

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

(UNAUDITED)

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

4

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

5

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

(UNAUDITED)

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

6

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except share and per share data, unless specifically noted)

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Preformed Line Products Company and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “PLPC”) have been prepared in accordance with United States of America (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. In the opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements contain all estimates and adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, required to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2015.

The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2015 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

NOTE B – OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION

Inventories – net

Cost of inventories for certain material is determined using the last-in-first-out (LIFO) method and totaled approximately $26.5 million at March 31, 2015 and $27 million at December 31, 2014. An actual valuation of inventories under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of the year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these estimates are subject to change and may be different than the actual inventory levels and costs at the end of the year, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the net change in LIFO inventories resulted in a $.1 million charge to Income before income taxes. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the net change in LIFO inventories resulted in a $.1 million benefit to Income before income taxes.

Noncurrent inventory is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

7

Table of Contents

Property, plant and equipment - net

Major classes of Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and were as follows:

Legal proceedings

From time to time, the Company may be subject to litigation incidental to its business. The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that the Company believes would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

NOTE C – PENSION PLANS

The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the Preformed Line Products Company Employees’ Retirement Plan (the “Plan”). Net periodic benefit cost for this plan included the following components:

No contributions were made to the Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Company does not anticipate contributing to the Plan in 2015.

8

Table of Contents

NOTE D – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (“AOCI”)

The following tables set forth the total changes in AOCI by component, net of tax:

NOTE E – COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share were computed by dividing Net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings per share were calculated by dividing Net income (loss) by the weighted-average of all potentially dilutive common stock that was outstanding during the periods presented.

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, 59,750 and 17,000 stock options, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, 12,775 and 55,312 restricted share units, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the effect of the settlement in common shares would have been anti-dilutive.

9

Table of Contents

NOTE F – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

The Company’s finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of the following:

The aggregate amortization expense for other intangibles with finite lives for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $.4 million for each period. Amortization expense is estimated to be $.8 million for the remaining period of 2015, $1.1 million for 2016, $1 million for 2017, $1 million for 2018 and $1 million for 2019. The weighted-average remaining amortization period is approximately 21.2 years. The weighted-average remaining amortization period by intangible asset class is as follows: patents, 10.8 years; land use rights, 59.9 years; trademark, 10.4 years; technology, 16.6 years; and customer relationships, 14.8 years.

The Company’s measurement date for its annual impairment test for goodwill is October 1st of each year. There were no indications of impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Company performs its annual impairment test for goodwill utilizing a combination of discounted cash flow methodology, market comparables and an overall market capitalization reasonableness test in computing fair value by reporting unit. The Company then compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value to assess if goodwill has been impaired. Based on the assumptions as to growth, discount rates and the weighting used for each respective valuation methodology, results of the valuations could be significantly different. The Company believes that the methodologies and weightings used are reasonable and result in appropriate fair values of the reporting units.

The Company’s only intangible asset with an indefinite life is goodwill. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, are as follows:

10

Table of Contents

NOTE G – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The 1999 Stock Option Plan

Activity in the Company’s 1999 Stock Option Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was as follows:

There were no stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded no compensation expense related to stock options for either period as all options are fully vested.

Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008

Under the Preformed Line Products Company Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008 (the “LTIP”), certain employees, officers, and directors are eligible to receive awards of options, restricted shares and restricted share units. The purpose of this LTIP is to give the Company a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining, and motivating officers, employees and directors and to provide an incentive to those individuals to increase shareholder value through long-term incentives directly linked to the Company’s performance. The total number of Company common shares reserved for awards under the LTIP is 900,000. Of the 900,000 common shares, 800,000 common shares have been reserved for restricted share units and 100,000 common shares have been reserved for stock options. The LTIP expires on April 17, 2018.

Restricted Share Units

For all of the participants except the CEO, a portion of the restricted share units (RSUs) is subject to time-based cliff vesting and a portion is subject to vesting based upon the Company’s performance over a three-year period. All of the CEO’s RSUs are subject to vesting based upon the Company’s performance over a three-year period.

The RSUs are offered at no cost to the employees; however, the participant must remain employed with the Company until the restrictions on the RSUs lapse. The fair value of RSUs is based on the market price of a common share on the grant date. The Company currently estimates that no RSUs will be forfeited. Dividends declared are accrued in cash.

A summary of the RSUs for the three months ended March 31, 2015 is as follows:

For time-based RSUs, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award in General and administrative expense in the accompanying Statements of Consolidated Income. Compensation expense related to the time-based RSUs for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $.1 million for each period. As of March 31,

11

Table of Contents

2015, there was $.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to time-based RSUs that is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining period of approximately 2 years.

For the performance-based RSUs, the number of RSUs in which the participants will vest depends on the Company’s level of performance measured by growth in pretax income and sales growth over a requisite performance period. Depending on the extent to which the performance criterions are probable of being satisfied under the LTIP, the participants are eligible to earn common shares over the vesting period. Performance-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $.4 million and $.6 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, a $.4 million increase in performance-based compensation expense was recorded related to the 2013 performance-based RSU grant, due to changes in estimates for growth in sales. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, a $.4 million reduction in performance-based compensation expense was recorded related to the 2014 performance-based RSU grant, due to changes in estimates for growth in sales and pretax income. As of March 31, 2015, the remaining performance-based RSUs compensation expense of $3.6 million is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately 2.3 years.

The excess tax benefits from service and performance-based RSUs for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was less than $.1 million and $.2 million, respectively, as reported on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in financing activities, and represents the reduction in income taxes otherwise payable during the period, attributable to the actual gross tax benefits in excess of the expected tax benefits for RSUs vested in the current period.

In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the LTIP), vesting of the RSUs will be accelerated and all restrictions will lapse. Unvested performance-based awards are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares awarded at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout level depending on achievement of performance-based award objectives.

To satisfy the vesting of its RSU awards, the Company has reserved new shares from its authorized but unissued shares. Any additional granted awards will also be issued from the Company’s authorized but unissued shares. Under the LTIP, there are 327,398 common shares currently available for additional RSU grants.

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company maintains a trust, commonly referred to as a rabbi trust, in connection with the Company’s deferred compensation plan. This plan allows for two deferrals. First, Directors make elective deferrals of Director fees payable and held in the rabbi trust. The deferred compensation plan allows the Directors to elect to receive Director fees in common shares of the Company at a later date instead of fees paid each quarter in cash. Second, this plan allows certain Company employees to defer LTIP restricted shares or RSUs for future distribution in the form of common shares. Assets of the rabbi trust are consolidated, and the value of the Company’s stock held in the rabbi trust is classified in Shareholders’ equity and generally accounted for in a manner similar to treasury stock. The Company recognizes the original amount of the deferred compensation (fair value of the deferred stock award at the date of grant) as the basis for recognition in common shares issued to the rabbi trust. Changes in the fair value of amounts owed to certain employees or Directors are not recognized as the Company’s deferred compensation plan does not permit diversification and must be settled by the delivery of a fixed number of the Company’s common shares. As of March 31, 2015, 289,942 shares have been deferred and are being held by the rabbi trust.

Share Option Awards

The LTIP plan permits the grant of 100,000 options to buy common shares of the Company to certain employees at not less than fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. At March 31, 2015 there were 21,500 shares remaining available for issuance under the LTIP. Options issued to date under the Plan vest 50% after one year following the date of the grant, 75% after two years, and 100% after three years and expire from five to ten years from the date of grant. Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises will be funded with the issuance of new shares.

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating fair values of options. The Black-Scholes model requires assumptions regarding the volatility of the Company’s stock, the expected life of the stock award and the Company’s dividend yield. The Company utilizes historical data in determining these assumptions. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. zero coupon Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. Forfeitures have been estimated to be zero.

12

Table of Contents

There were 0 and 17,000 options granted for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The fair value for the stock options granted in 2014 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Activity in the Company’s LTIP plan for three months ended March 31, 2015 was as follows:

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2014 was $25.79. There were 0 and 1,250 stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was zero and less than $.1 million. Cash received for the exercise of stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was zero and $.1 million.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded compensation expense related to the stock options currently vesting of $.1 million and $.1 million, respectively. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized at March 31, 2015 is expected to be a combined total of $.4 million over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.2 years.

NOTE H – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The carrying value of the Company’s current financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, and short-term debt, approximates its fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. At March 31, 2015, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated using discounted cash flows analysis, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of

13

Table of Contents

borrowing arrangements which are considered to be Level 2 inputs. There have been no transfers in or out of Level 2 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Based on the analysis performed, the fair value and the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt are as follows:

NOTE I – RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity,” or ASU 2014-08. ASU 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting a discontinued operation. Under the new pronouncement, a disposal of a part of an organization that has a major effect on its operations and financial results is a discontinued operation. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2014-08 prospectively for all disposals or components of the business classified as held for sale during the fiscal period beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2015 and it did not have an effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

NOTE J – NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS TO BE ADOPTED

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-01, “Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. A material event or transaction that an entity considers to be of an unusual nature or of a type that indicates infrequency of occurrence or both shall be reported as a separate component of income from continuing operations. The nature and financial effects of each event or transaction shall be presented as a separate component of income from continuing operations or, alternatively, disclosed in notes to financial statements. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, its adoption will have to the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” ASU 2014-15 provides guidance in GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2014-15 prospectively for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, its adoption will have to the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” or ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue in a matter that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, the amendment provides five steps that an entity should apply when recognizing revenue. The amendment also specifies the accounting of some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands the disclosure requirements around contracts with customers. An entity can either adopt this amendment retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with cumulative effect of initially applying the update recognized at the date of initial application. The amendment is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, its adoption will have to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

14

Table of Contents

NOTE K – SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following tables present a summary of the Company’s reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Financial results for the PLP-USA segment include the elimination of all segments’ intercompany profit in inventory.

NOTE L – INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate was -334% and 34% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The income tax expense for this period was determined based on an estimated annual effective tax rate of 31% for the twelve months ending December 31, 2015. The effective tax rate for three months ended March 31, 2015 differs from the estimated annual 2015 effective tax rate primarily due to losses of $.9 million in certain jurisdictions where no tax benefit is recognized coupled with a low level of pre-tax loss for the period. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to losses of $.9 million in certain jurisdictions where no tax benefit is recognized coupled with lower earnings in jurisdictions with

15

Table of Contents

lower tax rates than the U.S. federal statutory rate where such earnings are permanently reinvested. The lower effective tax rate for the three months ending March 31, 2015 compared with the same period for 2014 was primarily due to losses of $.9 million in certain jurisdictions where no tax benefit is recognized, decreased earnings in jurisdictions with lower tax rates than the U.S. federal statutory rate where such earnings are permanently reinvested and overall lower earnings before taxes.

The Company provides valuation allowances against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. No significant changes to the valuation allowance were reflected for the period ended March 31, 2015.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $.8 million with no significant changes during the period ended March 31, 2015. The Company may decrease its unrecognized tax benefits by $.6 million within the next nine months.

NOTE M – PRODUCT WARRANTY RESERVE

The Company records an accrual for estimated warranty costs to Costs of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income. These amounts are recorded in Accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company records and accounts for its warranty reserve based on specific claim incidents. Should the Company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and reasonably estimable, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are made quarterly to the accruals as claim information changes.

The following is a rollforward of the product warranty reserve:

NOTE N – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On January 31, 2014, the Company acquired Helix Uniformed Limited (Helix), located in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. From an accounting perspective, the acquisition is not considered material. The acquisition of Helix will diversify the Company’s business in Canada, expand its manufacturing footprint and enhance its engineering capabilities. The results of Helix are included in The Americas reportable segment.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to help the readers of our financial statements better understand our results of operations, financial condition and present business environment. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

The MD&A is organized as follows:

16

Table of Contents

OVERVIEW

Preformed Line Products Company (the “Company”, “PLPC”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) was incorporated in Ohio in 1947. We are an international designer and manufacturer of products and systems employed in the construction and maintenance of overhead and underground networks for the energy, telecommunication, cable operators, information (data communication), and other similar industries. Our primary products support, protect, connect, terminate, and secure cables and wires. We also provide solar hardware systems and mounting hardware for a variety of solar power applications. Our goal is to continue to achieve profitable growth as a leader in the research, innovation, development, manufacture, and marketing of technically advanced products and services related to energy, communications and cable systems and to take advantage of this leadership position to sell additional quality products in familiar markets. We have 29 sales and manufacturing operations in 17 different countries.

We report our segments in four geographic regions: PLP-USA (including corporate), The Americas (includes operations in North and South America without PLP-USA), EMEA (Europe, Middle East & Africa) and Asia-Pacific in accordance with accounting standards codified in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280, Segment Reporting. Each segment distributes a full range of our primary products. Our PLP-USA segment is comprised of our U.S. operations manufacturing our traditional products primarily supporting our domestic energy and telecommunications products. Our other three segments, The Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific, support our energy, telecommunications, data communication and solar products in each respective geographical region.

The segment managers responsible for each region report directly to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who is the chief operating decision maker, and are accountable for the financial results and performance of their entire segment for which they are responsible. The business components within each segment are managed to maximize the results of the entire operating segment and company rather than the results of any individual business component of the segment.

We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on several factors primarily based on sales and net income.

PREFACE

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Our discussions of the financial results include non-GAAP measures (e.g., foreign currency impact) to provide additional information concerning our financial results and provide information that we believe is useful to the readers of our financial statements in the assessment of our performance and operating trends.

Our financial statements are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. As foreign currencies weaken against the U.S. dollar, our revenues and costs decrease as the foreign currency-denominated financial statements translate into fewer U.S. dollars. On average, foreign currencies weakened against the U.S. dollar in the first quarter of 2015. The most significant currencies that contributed to this movement were the Australian dollar, the Brazilian real, the Canadian dollar and the South African rand. The fluctuations of foreign currencies during the three months ended March 31, 2015 had an unfavorable impact on net sales of $6.5 million

17

Table of Contents

compared to the same period in 2014. On a reportable segment basis, the favorable (unfavorable) impact of foreign currency on net sales and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2015, was as follows:

The following operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are compared to the same period in 2014. Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2015 of $85.8 million decreased $4.1 million, or 5%, compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net sales increased 3%. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased to 28.9% of net sales from 30.5% of net sales in 2014. Gross profit of $24.8 million decreased $2.7 million compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of currency translation, gross profit decreased $1.0 million, or 4%, compared to 2014. Costs and expenses of $24.8 million increased $1.6 million compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of translation, costs and expenses increased $3.3 million compared to 2014. Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was a loss of $.1 million, a decrease of $4.3 million compared to 2014. Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 of $.3 million was a decrease of $3.0 million compared to the net income in 2014. The effect of currency translation of the preceding factors was negligible on both operating loss and net loss compared to 2014; however, there was an incremental $4.0 million in losses on foreign currency transactions that negatively impacted the operating results as summarized in the following table:

Despite the current global economy, we believe our business fundamentals are sound and strategically well-positioned as we remain focused on managing costs, increasing sales volumes and delivering value to our customers. We have continued to invest in the business to improve efficiency, develop new products, increase our capacity and become an even stronger supplier to our customers. We currently have a bank debt to equity ratio of 14.0% and can borrow needed funds at an attractive interest rate under our credit facility.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014

The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s Statement of Consolidated Income and the percentage of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company’s past operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.

18

Table of Contents

NM- Not meaningful.

Net sales. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, net sales were $85.8 million, a decrease of $4.1 million, or 5%, from the three months ended March 31, 2014. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net sales increased $2.3 million, or 3% as summarized in the following table:

The increase in PLP-USA net sales of $1.3 million, or 4%, was primarily due to an increase in export sales along with growth in domestic telecommunications volume. International net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were unfavorably affected by $6.5 million when local currencies were converted to U.S. dollars. The following discussion of net sales excludes the effect of currency translation. The Americas net sales of $16.1 million declined $4.7 million, or 20%, with a decrease primarily in solar and transmission sales. EMEA net sales of $14.2 million increased $2.0 million, or 14%, primarily due to an increase in telecommunications and transmission projects in the region. In Asia-Pacific, net sales of $23.5 million increased $3.8 million, or 17%, compared to 2014. The increase in net sales was primarily due to an increase in solar and transmission sales in the region even though governments deferred the construction of transmission lines in a few locations in the region.

19

Table of Contents

Gross profit. Gross profit of $24.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 decreased $2.7 million, or 10%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014. Excluding the effect of currency translation, gross profit decreased $1.0 million, or 4% as summarized in the following table:

PLP-USA gross profit of $11.0 million increased $.6 million compared to the same period in 2014. PLP-USA’s increase was generated through an increase in sales volume and the mix of sales led to a higher gross profit rate for 2015 compared to 2014. International gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was unfavorably impacted by $1.7 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars. The following discussion of gross profit excludes the effects of currency translation. The Americas gross profit decrease of $1.9 million was primarily the result of the $4.7 million sales decline coupled with some gross profit degradation due to foreign currency exchange losses for certain raw material acquisitions. The EMEA gross profit increased $1.2 million as a result of a $2.0 million sales increase coupled with improved gross profit due to a shift in sales mix. Asia-Pacific gross profit decreased $.9 million as a result of a shift in sales mix towards lower gross profit sales in a few of the locations.

Costs and expenses. Costs and expenses of $24.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased $1.6 million, or 7%, compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of currency translation, costs and expenses increased $3.3 million, or 14% as summarized in the following table:

PLP-USA costs and expenses increased $3.2 million primarily due to higher net foreign currency exchange losses of $2.9 million and reduced royalty income partially offset by a reduction of personnel costs. The foreign currency exchange losses are primarily related to translating into U.S. dollars our foreign currency denominated loans, trade receivables and royalty receivables from foreign subsidiaries at the quarter-end exchange rates. International costs and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were favorably impacted by $1.7 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars. The following discussion of costs and expenses excludes the effect of currency translation. The Americas costs and expenses of $4.7 million increased $.9 million primarily due to net foreign currency exchange losses. EMEA costs and expenses of $3.1 million decreased $.1 million due primarily to lower commission expense in the region. Asia-Pacific costs and expenses of $5.4 million decreased $.7 million primarily due to savings in personnel costs from staffing modifications implemented in 2014 along with overall tighter expense management.

Other income. Other income (expense) for the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased $.1 million compared to 2014.

20

Table of Contents

Income taxes . Income taxes for the three months ending March 31, 2015 and 2014 were $.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, based on pretax loss of $.1 million and pretax income of $4.1 million, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ending March 31, 2015 and 2014 was -334% and 34%, respectively, compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%. Our tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income we earn in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and local income taxes, the following items had the most significant impact on the difference between our statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% and our effective tax rate:

2015

2014

The income tax expense for this period was determined based on an estimated annual effective tax rate of 31% for the twelve months ending December 31, 2015. The effective tax rate was 39.9% for the twelve months ending December 31, 2014. The 2015 estimated annual effective tax rate is lower than the actual effective tax rate for 2014 primarily due to the Company providing a valuation allowance in 2014 against deferred tax assets attributable to operating losses and other deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions.

Net income. As a result of the preceding items, the net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $.3 million, compared to net income of $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net income decreased $3.0 million as summarized in the following table: