PROS HOLDINGS, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
______________________________________________________
|
ý
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2013
OR
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
.
Commission File Number: 001-33554
______________________________________________________
PROS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________________________
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0168604
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
3100 Main Street, Suite 900 Houston TX
|
77002
|
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
|
(713) 335-5151
|
|||
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
|
|||
____________________________________________________
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large Accelerated Filer
|
o
|
Accelerated Filer
|
x
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
o
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller Reporting Company
|
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, was
27,918,133
as of
April 30, 2013
.
PROS Holdings, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended
March 31, 2013
Table of Contents
|
|
Page
|
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. These forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections, and the beliefs and assumptions of our management including, without limitation, our expectations regarding the following: the sales of our software products and services; the impact of our revenue recognition policies; our belief that our current assets, including cash, cash equivalents, and expected cash flows from operating activities, will be sufficient to fund our operations; our anticipated additions to property, plant and equipment; our belief that our facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current operating needs; and our belief that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates
.
Words such as “we expect,” “anticipate,” “target,” “project,” “believe,” “goals,” “estimate,” “potential,” “predict,” “may,” “might,” “could,” “intend,” and variations of these types of words and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements.
PROS Holdings, Inc.
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
March 31, 2013
|
December 31, 2012
|
||||||
|
Assets:
|
|||||||
|
Current assets:
|
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
82,462
|
|
$
|
83,558
|
|
|
|
Accounts and unbilled receivables, net of allowance of $700 and $760, respectively
|
42,742
|
|
38,801
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
6,199
|
|
5,067
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
131,403
|
|
127,426
|
|
|||
|
Restricted cash
|
329
|
|
329
|
|
|||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
14,709
|
|
12,788
|
|
|||
|
Other long term assets, net
|
5,955
|
|
5,936
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
152,396
|
|
$
|
146,479
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
$
|
3,775
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
4,418
|
|
3,258
|
|
|||
|
Accrued payroll and other employee benefits
|
3,123
|
|
7,669
|
|
|||
|
Deferred revenue
|
42,097
|
|
39,774
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
55,381
|
|
54,476
|
|
|||
|
Long-term deferred revenue
|
2,432
|
|
2,007
|
|
|||
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
1,327
|
|
1,327
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities
|
59,140
|
|
57,810
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
|
|||||||
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|||||||
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized none issued
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized; 32,332,136 and 31,966,432 shares issued, respectively; 27,914,551 and 27,548,847 shares outstanding, respectively
|
32
|
|
32
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
90,544
|
|
87,693
|
|
|||
|
Treasury stock, 4,417,585 common shares, at cost
|
(13,938
|
)
|
(13,938
|
)
|
|||
|
Retained earnings
|
16,618
|
|
14,882
|
|
|||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
93,256
|
|
88,669
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
152,396
|
|
$
|
146,479
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PROS Holdings, Inc.
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Revenue:
|
|||||||
|
License and implementation
|
$
|
22,592
|
|
$
|
17,796
|
|
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
11,034
|
|
9,225
|
|
|||
|
Total revenue
|
33,626
|
|
27,021
|
|
|||
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|||||||
|
License and implementation
|
8,471
|
|
6,003
|
|
|||
|
Maintenance and support
|
2,082
|
|
1,935
|
|
|||
|
Total cost of revenue
|
10,553
|
|
7,938
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
23,073
|
|
19,083
|
|
|||
|
Operating expenses:
|
|||||||
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative
|
14,288
|
|
10,256
|
|
|||
|
Research and development
|
8,096
|
|
6,697
|
|
|||
|
Income from operations
|
689
|
|
2,130
|
|
|||
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
(103
|
)
|
22
|
|
|||
|
Income before income tax provision
|
586
|
|
2,152
|
|
|||
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
(1,148
|
)
|
961
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
27,757,397
|
|
27,166,973
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
29,365,342
|
|
28,284,044
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PROS Holdings, Inc.
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Operating activities:
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
967
|
|
427
|
|
|||
|
Share-based compensation
|
3,420
|
|
2,032
|
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
(1,395
|
)
|
|||
|
Tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
(10
|
)
|
1,358
|
|
|||
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
(60
|
)
|
(220
|
)
|
|||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Accounts and unbilled receivables
|
(3,877
|
)
|
6,219
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(1,162
|
)
|
(318
|
)
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
1,070
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
980
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|||
|
Accrued payroll and other employee benefits
|
(4,549
|
)
|
(3,059
|
)
|
|||
|
Deferred revenue
|
2,748
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
1,261
|
|
3,424
|
|
|||
|
Investing activities:
|
|||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(948
|
)
|
(684
|
)
|
|||
|
Capitalized internal-use software development costs
|
(796
|
)
|
(347
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(1,744
|
)
|
(1,031
|
)
|
|||
|
Financing activities:
|
|||||||
|
Exercise of stock options
|
1,409
|
|
488
|
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
1,395
|
|
|||
|
Tax withholding related to net share settlement of restricted stock units
|
(2,022
|
)
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(613
|
)
|
63
|
|
|||
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,096
|
)
|
2,456
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|||||||
|
Beginning of period
|
83,558
|
|
68,457
|
|
|||
|
End of period
|
$
|
82,462
|
|
$
|
70,913
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PROS Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Nature of Operations
PROS Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, through its operating subsidiaries (the “Company”), provides big data software applications designed to help companies outperform in their markets by using big data to sell more effectively. The Company applies data science to unlock buying patterns and preferences within transaction data to reveal which opportunities are most likely to close, which offers are most likely to sell and which prices are most likely to win. The Company offers big data software applications to analyze, execute, and optimize sales, pricing, quoting, rebates and revenue management. The Company also provides professional services to implement its software applications as well as business consulting. In addition, the Company provides product maintenance and support to its customers to receive unspecified upgrades, maintenance releases and bug fixes during the term of the support period on a when-and-if-available basis. The Company provides its big data software applications to enterprises across a range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, services and travel.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the application of significant accounting policies as described below and elsewhere in these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and applicable quarterly reporting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In management’s opinion, the accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position of the Company as of
March 31, 2013
, the results of operations for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2013
.
Certain information and disclosures normally included in the notes to the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted from these interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012
(“Annual Report”) filed with the SEC. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2012
was derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.
Basis of consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Dollar amounts
The dollar amounts presented in the tabular data within these footnote disclosures are stated in thousands of dollars, except per unit amounts, or as noted within the context of each footnote disclosure.
Use of estimates
The Company’s management prepares the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The Company makes estimates and assumptions in the preparation of its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and its estimates and assumptions may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The complexity and judgment required in the Company’s estimation process and issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent in the application of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting affect the amounts of revenue, expenses, unbilled receivables and deferred revenue. Estimates are also used for, but not limited to, receivables, allowance for doubtful accounts, useful lives of assets, depreciation, income taxes and deferred tax asset valuation, valuation of stock options, other current liabilities and accrued liabilities. Numerous internal and external factors can affect estimates. The critical accounting policies related to the estimates and judgments are discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012
under
management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies as described in the Company’s Annual Report.
Revenue recognition
The Company derives its revenue from the licensing and implementation of software solutions and associated software maintenance and support. To a lesser extent, the Company's revenue includes nonsoftware related hosting services. The Company's arrangements with customers typically include: (a) license fees paid for the use of our solutions either in perpetuity or over a specified term and implementation fees for configuration, implementation and training services and (b) maintenance and support fees related to technical support and software updates. If there is significant uncertainty about contract completion or collectability is not reasonably assured, revenue is deferred until the uncertainty is sufficiently resolved or collectability is reasonably assured. In addition, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and fees are fixed or determinable. For certain arrangements, we engage independent contractors to assist in the implementation of our software solutions. These arrangements are analyzed based on numerous factors to determine the amount of revenue to be recognized.
In determining whether implementation services revenue should be accounted for separately from license revenue, the Company evaluates whether the professional services are considered essential to the functionality of the software using factors such as: the nature of its software products; whether they are ready for use by the customer upon receipt; the nature of its implementation services; the availability of services from other vendors; whether the timing of payments for license revenue is coincident with performance of services; and whether milestones or acceptance criteria exist that affect the realizability of the software license fee.
The Company's software license arrangements typically include implementation services that can be considered essential to the customer's usability of the licensed software solutions and accordingly do not qualify for separate accounting treatment. The license and implementation services revenues and software license revenues are generally recognized together with the implementation services using the percentage-of-completion method or completed contract method. The completed contract method is used for contracts where there is a risk over final acceptance by the customer or for contracts that are short term in nature.
The percentage-of-completion computation is measured by the percentage of man-days incurred during the reporting period as compared to the estimated total man-days necessary for each contract for implementation of the software solutions. The Company measures performance under the percentage-of-completion method using total man-day method based on current estimates of man-days to complete the project. The Company believes that for each such project, man-days expended in proportion to total estimated man-days at completion represents the most reliable and meaningful measure for determining a project's progress toward completion. Under our fixed-fee arrangements, should a loss be anticipated on a contract, the full amount is recorded when the loss is determinable.
The Company also licenses software solutions under term license agreements that typically include maintenance during the license term. When maintenance is included for the entire term of the license, there is no renewal rate and the Company has not established vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value for the maintenance on term licenses. For term license agreements, revenue and the associated costs are deferred until the delivery of the solution and recognized ratably over the remaining license term.
For arrangements that include hosting services we allocate the arrangement consideration between the hosting service and other elements and recognize the hosting fee ratably beginning on the date the customer commences use of our services and continuing through the end of the customer term.
The Company's customer arrangements typically contain multiple elements that include software license, implementation services and post-implementation maintenance and support. In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, (amendments to FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition), which amended the accounting standards for certain multiple deliverable revenue arrangements that contain nonsoftware related elements to:
|
•
|
provide updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and how the consideration should be allocated;
|
|
•
|
require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using best estimated selling price, (“BESP”) of deliverables if a vendor does not have VSOE of selling price; and
|
|
•
|
eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method.
|
For multiple element arrangements containing our nonsoftware services, the Company must (1) determine whether and when each element has been delivered; (2) determine fair value of each element using the selling price hierarchy of VSOE of fair value, third party evidence (“TPE”), or BESP, as applicable, and (3) allocate the total price among the various elements based on the relative selling price method.
For multiple-element arrangements that contain software and nonsoftware elements such as the Company's hosting service offerings, we allocate revenue between the software and software related elements as a group and any nonsoftware elements based on a relative fair value allocation. We determine fair value for each deliverable using this hierarchy and utilize VSOE of fair value if it exists.
In certain instances, the Company may not be able to establish VSOE for all deliverables in an arrangement with multiple elements. This may be due to infrequently selling each element separately, not pricing solutions or services within a narrow range, or only having a limited sales history. In addition, TPE may not be available. When the Company is unable to establish selling prices using VSOE or TPE, it uses BESP in the allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis. For transactions that only include software and software-related elements, the Company continues to account for such arrangements under the software revenue recognition standards which require it to establish VSOE of fair value to allocate arrangement consideration to multiple deliverables.
Maintenance and support revenue includes post-implementation customer support and the right to unspecified software updates and enhancements on a when and if available basis. The Company generally invoices for maintenance and support services on a monthly, quarterly or on an annual basis through the maintenance and support period. The Company recognizes revenue from maintenance arrangements ratably over the period in which the services are provided.
Software license and implementation revenue that has been recognized, but for which the Company has not invoiced the customer, is recorded as unbilled receivables. Invoices that have been issued before software license, implementation and maintenance and support revenue has been recognized are recorded as deferred revenue in the accompanying
unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Internal-use software
Costs incurred to develop internal-use software during the application development stage are capitalized, stated at cost, and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Application development stage costs generally include salaries and personnel costs and third party contractor expenses associated with internal-use software configuration, coding, installation and testing. During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
, the Company capitalized internal-use software development costs of
$0.9 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively, related to its cloud-based offerings. Capitalized software for internal use is included in property and equipment, net in the
unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Noncash share-based compensation
The Company measures all share-based payments to its employees based on the grant date fair value of the awards and recognizes expense in the Company’s unaudited consolidated statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the period during which the recipient is required to perform service (generally over the vesting period of the awards). To date, the Company has granted Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”), Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and Market Stock Units (“MSUs”). The MSUs are performance-based awards that vest based upon the Company’s relative shareholder return.
The following table presents the number of shares or units outstanding for each award type as of
March 31, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, respectively.
|
Award type
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
||
|
Stock options
|
1,343,710
|
|
1,474,828
|
|
||
|
Restricted stock units
|
1,662,751
|
|
1,182,726
|
|
||
|
Stock appreciation rights
|
746,225
|
|
789,637
|
|
||
|
Market share units
|
456,000
|
|
205,000
|
|
||
Stock options, SARs and RSUs vest ratably between
three
and
four
years. The actual number of MSUs that will be eligible to vest is based on the total shareholder return of the Company relative to the total shareholder return of the Russell 2000 Index (“Index”) over the Performance Period, as defined by each awards plan documents.
The fair value of the RSUs is based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.
The Company estimates the fair value of MSUs on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The determination of fair value of the MSUs is affected by the Company’s stock price and a number of assumptions including the expected volatilities of the Company’s stock and the Index, its risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. The Company’s expected volatility at the date of grant was based on the historical volatilities of the Company and the Index over the Performance Period. The Company did not estimate a forfeiture rate for the MSUs due to the limited size, the vesting period, nature of the grantee population and the lack of history of granting this type of award.
The assumptions used to value the MSUs granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2013
were as follows:
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2013
|
|
|
Volatility
|
57%
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.35%
|
|
|
Expected option life in years
|
2.84
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
—
|
|
Earnings per share
The Company computes basic earnings per share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares then outstanding. Potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and SARs or the vesting of share-based awards. Diluted earnings per share reflect the assumed conversion of all dilutive share-based awards using the treasury stock method.
Fair value measurement
The Company’s financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of
$58.0 million
invested in treasury money market funds at both
March 31, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, respectively. The fair value of these accounts is determined based on quoted market prices, which represents level 1 in the fair value hierarchy as defined by ASC 820, “
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure
.”
Deferred revenue and unbilled receivables
Software license and implementation services that have been performed, but for which the Company has not invoiced the customer, are recorded as unbilled receivables, and invoices that have been issued before the software license and implementation services have been performed are recorded as deferred revenue in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company generally invoices for maintenance and support services on a monthly, a quarterly or an annual basis through the maintenance and support period.
Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2013,
$0.2 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the revolving credit facility ("Revolver") is included in other long term assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three months ended March 31, 2013,
$13,000
of debt issuance cost amortization is included in interest expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
As of
March 31, 2013
, the Company had
no
outstanding borrowings under the Revolver.
Income taxes
At the end of each interim reporting period, the Company estimates its annual effective tax rate to calculate its income tax provision. The estimated effective tax rate includes U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes and is based on the application of an estimated annual income tax rate applied to the current quarter’s year-to-date pre-tax income. This estimated effective tax rate is used in providing for income taxes on a year-to-date basis and may change in subsequent interim reporting periods.
The effective tax rate (benefit) for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
was
(196)%
and
45%
, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate of
34%
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
was due primarily to a
$1.4 million
discrete benefit attributed to the 2012 Research and Experimentations ("R&E") tax credit that was retroactively reinstated in the first quarter of 2013, partially offset by a rate increase attributable to nondeductible share-based compensation expense.
3. Earnings per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
:
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Numerator:
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|||||||
|
Weighted average shares (basic)
|
27,757
|
|
27,167
|
|
|||
|
Dilutive effect of potential common shares
|
1,608
|
|
1,117
|
|
|||
|
Weighted average shares (diluted)
|
29,365
|
|
28,284
|
|
|||
|
Basic earnings per share
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, settlement of SARs, vesting of RSUs and MSUs. Potential common shares determined to be antidilutive and excluded from diluted weighted average shares outstanding were approximately
10,000
and
413,000
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
.
4. Noncash Share-based Compensation
During the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, the Company granted
779,850
shares of RSUs with a weighted average grant-date fair value of
$19.60
per share. The Company granted
251,000
MSUs with a weighted average grant-date fair value of
$40.58
to certain executive officers and non-executive employees during the three months ended
March 31, 2013
. These MSU's vest on January 1, 2016 and the actual number of MSUs that will be eligible to vest is based on the total shareholder return of the Company relative to the total shareholder return of the Index over the Performance Period, as defined by each award's plan documents. The Company did not grant any stock options or SARs during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
.
Share-based compensation expense is allocated to expense categories on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
:
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation:
|
|||||||
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|||||||
|
License and implementation
|
$
|
462
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
|
Total included in cost of revenue
|
462
|
|
329
|
|
|||
|
Operating expenses:
|
|||||||
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative
|
2,222
|
|
1,268
|
|
|||
|
Research and development
|
736
|
|
435
|
|
|||
|
Total included in operating expenses
|
2,958
|
|
1,703
|
|
|||
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
$
|
3,420
|
|
$
|
2,032
|
|
|
In February 2013, the Company increased the number of shares available for issuance by
900,000
to
7,268,000
under an evergreen provision in our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan ("2007 Stock Plan"). As of
March 31, 2013
,
433,888
shares remained available for issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan. At
March 31, 2013
, there was an estimated
$40.7 million
of total unrecognized compensation costs related to share-based compensation arrangements. These costs will be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.9
years.
5. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation:
In the ordinary course of the Company’s business, the Company regularly becomes involved in contract and other negotiations and, in more limited circumstances, becomes involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation. The outcomes of these matters are inherently unpredictable. The Company is not currently involved in any outstanding litigation that it believes, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The terms “we,” “us,” “PROS“ and “our” refer to PROS Holdings, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries that are consolidated in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read along with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and unaudited notes to condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Overview
PROS provides big data software applications designed to help companies outperform in their markets by using big data to sell more effectively. We apply 27 years of data science experience to unlock buying patterns and preferences within transaction data to reveal which opportunities are most likely to close, which offers are most likely to sell and which prices are most likely to win. PROS offers big data software applications to analyze, execute and optimize sales, pricing, quoting, rebates and revenue management. We also provide professional services to implement our software applications, as well as business consulting. Since inception, PROS has completed over 600 implementations of our solutions across more than 30 industries in more than 50 countries.
Opportunities, Trends and Uncertainties
We have noted opportunities, trends and uncertainties that we believe are particularly significant to understand our financial results and condition.
|
•
|
Growth opportunities.
We believe the market for our big data software applications is underpenetrated. Market interest for our software has increased over the past several years, providing us with growth opportunities. We have and will continue to invest in our business to more effectively address these opportunities through significant investment in professional services, research and development, sales, marketing and back office. In addition to organic growth, we may acquire companies or technologies that can contribute to the strategic, operational and financial growth of our business. We expect to continue to explore both organic and other strategic growth opportunities.
|
|
•
|
Uncertain global economic conditions.
Global economic conditions have been challenging in recent years, and continue to be somewhat uncertain. The uncertain economic conditions have had and may have a negative impact on the adoption of big data software and may increase the volatility in our business. Due to the uncertain economic conditions, we continue to experience long sales cycles, increased scrutiny on purchasing decisions and overall cautiousness taken by customers. In addition, certain foreign countries are still facing significant economic and political crises and it is possible that these crises could result in economic deterioration in the markets in which we operate. We believe our solutions provide value to our customers during periods of economic growth as well as in recessions, but the extent to which the current economic conditions will further affect our business is uncertain.
|
|
•
|
Variability in revenue.
Our revenue recognition policy provides visibility into a significant portion of our revenue in the near-term quarters, although the actual timing of revenue recognition varies based on the nature and requirements of our contracts. For the majority of our arrangements, we have not historically recognized license revenue upon customer contract signature and software delivery. We evaluate our contract terms and conditions as well as our implementation performance obligations in making our revenue recognition determination for each contract. Our contractual performance obligations in the future may differ from historical periods, impacting the timing of the recognition of revenue. For example, growth in our term license and SaaS service offerings may result in the deferral of revenue over the contractual term, whereas growth in perpetual license arrangements that meet the criteria for separation may result in the recognition of license revenue on delivery, provided revenue recognition criteria are met. Our revenue could also vary based on our customer mix and customer geographic location. We sell our software solutions to customers in the manufacturing, distribution, services and travel industries. From a geographical standpoint, approximately
53%
and
60%
of our consolidated revenues were derived from customers outside the United States for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
, respectively. Our contracts with customers outside the United States are predominately denominated in U.S. dollars. The economic and political environments around the world could change our concentration of revenue within industries and across geographies.
|
|
•
|
Income taxes
. For the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, our effective income tax rate (benefit) was
(196)%
as compared to the federal rate of 34%. In January 2013, Congress passed the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 which included, among other legislation, the retroactive extension of the Research and Experimentations ("R&E") tax credit. The passage of this legislation made the R&E tax credit retroactive to January 1, 2012 and extended the R&E tax credit until December 31, 2013. As a result of the retroactive reinstatement of the R&E tax credit, we recognized a discrete tax benefit of $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Excluding the impact of discrete tax items, our 2013 estimated effective tax rate is expected to approximate 48%.
|
Results of Operations
Comparison of three months ended
March 31, 2013
with three months ended
March 31, 2012
Revenue:
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Total Revenue
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Total Revenue
|
Variance $
|
Variance %
|
||||||||||||||
|
License and implementation
|
$
|
22,592
|
|
67
|
%
|
$
|
17,796
|
|
66
|
%
|
$
|
4,796
|
|
27
|
%
|
|||||
|
Maintenance and support
|
11,034
|
|
33
|
%
|
9,225
|
|
34
|
%
|
1,809
|
|
20
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
33,626
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
27,021
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
6,605
|
|
24
|
%
|
|||||
License and implementation.
License and implementation revenue increased
$4.8 million
to
$22.6 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from
$17.8 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
, representing a
27%
increase. The increase in license and implementation revenue was principally the result of a 13% increase in the number of implementations from 84 to 95, which increased the number of man-days expended by 35%, partially offset by a 6% decrease in the average revenue recognized per man-day as compared to the corresponding period in 2012.
License and implementation revenue includes revenue from both term licenses and hosting services. Revenue from term licenses represented approximately
3%
and
5%
of total revenue for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
, respectively. Revenue from hosting services represented approximately
3%
and
2%
of total revenue for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
, respectively.
Maintenance and support.
Maintenance and support revenue increased
$1.8 million
to
$11.0 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from
$9.2 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
, representing a
20%
increase. The increase in maintenance and support revenue is principally a result of an increase in the number of customers for which we are providing maintenance and support services.
Cost of revenue and gross profit:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Related Revenue
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Related Revenue
|
Variance $
|
Variance %
|
||||||||||||||
|
Cost of license and implementation
|
$
|
8,471
|
|
37
|
%
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
34
|
%
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
41
|
%
|
|||||
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
2,082
|
|
19
|
%
|
1,935
|
|
21
|
%
|
147
|
|
8
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total cost of revenue
|
$
|
10,553
|
|
31
|
%
|
$
|
7,938
|
|
29
|
%
|
$
|
2,615
|
|
33
|
%
|
|||||
|
Gross profit
|
$
|
23,073
|
|
69
|
%
|
$
|
19,083
|
|
71
|
%
|
$
|
3,990
|
|
21
|
%
|
|||||
Cost of license and implementation.
Cost of license and implementation increased
$2.5 million
to
$8.5 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from
$6.0 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
, representing a
41%
increase. The increase in cost of license and implementation revenue was principally attributable to an increase of $1.7 million of personnel costs. Personnel costs, which include our employees and third party contractors, increased primarily as a result of an increase in headcount needed to support the increased number of active and anticipated implementations. Included in the increase in personnel costs is an increase of $0.1 million of noncash share based compensation expense. In addition, there was an increase of $0.4 million of travel expenses due to the increase in the number of implementations and an increase of $0.3 million related to hosting and our cloud-based service offerings.
License and implementation gross profit percentages were
63%
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
as compared to
66%
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
. The decrease in the license and implementation gross profit percentage was principally the result of a
41%
increase in license and implementation costs due primarily to an increase in headcount needed to
support the increased number of active and anticipated implementations. License and implementation gross margins may vary from period to period depending on different factors, including the amount of implementation services required to deploy our solutions relative to the total contract price and additional headcount needed to support anticipated future implementations.
Cost of maintenance and support.
Cost of maintenance and support increased
$0.1 million
to
$2.1 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from
$1.9 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
, representing an
8%
increase. The cost of providing maintenance and support services consists largely of personnel related expenses. The increase in cost of maintenance was principally attributable to an increase of $0.1 million of personnel costs associated with the continued growth in our customer maintenance and support function commensurate with maintenance and support revenue growth.
Maintenance and support gross profit percentages were
81%
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
as compared to
79%
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
. The increase in maintenance and support gross profit percentages was principally the result of an increase of
20%
in maintenance and support revenue.
Gross profit.
Gross profit increased
$4.0 million
to
$23.1 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from
$19.1 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
, representing a
21%
increase. The increase in overall gross profit was principally attributable to a
24%
increase in total revenue.
Operating expenses:
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Total Revenue
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Total Revenue
|
Variance $
|
Variance %
|
||||||||||||||
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative
|
$
|
14,288
|
|
42
|
%
|
$
|
10,256
|
|
38
|
%
|
$
|
4,032
|
|
39
|
%
|
|||||
|
Research and development
|
8,096
|
|
24
|
%
|
6,697
|
|
25
|
%
|
1,399
|
|
21
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
$
|
22,384
|
|
66
|
%
|
$
|
16,953
|
|
63
|
%
|
$
|
5,431
|
|
32
|
%
|
|||||
Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses.
Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses increased
$4.0 million
to
$14.3 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from
$10.3 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
, representing a
39%
increase
.
The increase was principally attributable to an increase of $3.7 million in sales, marketing, general and administrative personnel costs as a result of an increase in headcount to support our current and future growth objectives and higher commission expenses resulting from higher revenue levels. Included in the increase in personnel costs is an increase of $1.0 million of noncash share based compensation. In addition, there was an increase of $0.4 million of overhead and other expenses, an increase of $0.2 million in travel expense primarily as a result of increase in sales activity and an increase of $0.2 million of third party professional fees. These increases were offset by a decrease of $0.3 million of marketing expenses and a decrease of $0.1 million of consultants fees related to the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system in 2012.
Research and development expenses.
Research and development expenses increased
$1.4 million
to
$8.1 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from
$6.7 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
, representing a
21%
increase. The increase in research and development expenses was principally attributable to an increase of $2.1 million in personnel costs as a result of increased headcount to support work on new projects and initiatives, offset by $0.6 million of personnel costs that were capitalized related to the development of our cloud-based service offerings. Included in the increase in personnel costs is an increase of $0.4 million of noncash share-based compensation.
Other (expense) income, net:
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Total Revenue
|
Amount
|
As a Percentage
of Total Revenue
|
Variance $
|
Variance %
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
—
|
%
|
$
|
22
|
|
—
|
%
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
(568
|
)%
|
|||||
Other (expense) income, net.
Other (expense)
income, net consists of interest income on our cash and cash equivalents, interest expense which includes debt issuance cost amortization on the revolving credit facility ("Revolver") and foreign currency exchange gains and losses on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Other expense for the period was primarily attributed to net increases in foreign currency losses and an increase in interest expense from the Revolver.
Income tax (benefit) provision
:
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
Variance $
|
Variance %
|
||||||||||
|
Effective tax rate
|
(196
|
)%
|
45
|
%
|
n/a
|
|
(241
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
$
|
(1,148
|
)
|
$
|
961
|
|
$
|
(2,109
|
)
|
(219
|
)%
|
|||
Income tax (benefit) provision
.
Our income tax provision decreased
$2.1 million
to a benefit of
$1.1 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
from a provision of
$1.0 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
. Our effective tax rate was
(196)%
and
45%
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due primarily to a $1.4 million discrete benefit attributed to the 2012 Research and Experimentations ("R&E") tax credit that was retroactively reinstated in the first quarter of 2013, partially offset by a rate increase attributable to nondeductible share-based compensation expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
At
March 31, 2013
, we had
$82.5 million
of cash and cash equivalents and
$76.0 million
of working capital as compared to
$83.6 million
of cash and cash equivalents and
$73.0 million
of working capital at
December 31, 2012
. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents are denominated in the U.S. dollar and are held in financial institutions located in the U.S. Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents, cash flows generated from operations and potential borrowings under our Revolver. Our material drivers or variants of operating cash flow are net income, noncash expenses (principally share-based compensation) and the timing of periodic billings and collections related to the sale of our software and related services. The primary source of operating cash flows is the collection of accounts receivable from our customers. Our operating cash flows are also impacted by the timing of payments to our vendors for accounts payable and other liabilities. We generally pay our vendors and service providers in accordance with the invoice terms and conditions.
Based on existing cash and cash equivalents balances, availability under our Revolver and our current estimates of revenues and expenses, we believe that we will have adequate liquidity and capital resources to meet our operational requirements and anticipated capital expenditures for the next twelve months. Our future working capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the operations of our existing business, our potential strategic expansion, future acquisitions we might undertake, and the expansion into complementary businesses. If such need arises, we may raise additional funds through equity or debt financings. At
March 31, 2013
, we had restricted cash of
$0.3 million
related to letters of credit.
The following table presents key components of our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012
.
|
|
For the three months ended March 31,
|
||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
1,261
|
|
$
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(1,744
|
)
|
(1,031
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(613
|
)
|
63
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents (beginning of period)
|
83,558
|
|
68,457
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents (end of period)
|
$
|
82,462
|
|
$
|
70,913
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
. Net cash provided by operating activities for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
was
$1.3 million
, which represents a decrease of
$2.2 million
when compared to the corresponding period in 2012. For the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
, our cash flows from operations were derived principally from our earnings from on-going operations prior to non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation and related tax benefits, provision for doubtful accounts and changes in our working capital. The
$2.2 million
decrease was due to a decrease of
$4.8 million
attributed to changes in operating assets and liabilities, which are comprised of accounts receivable, unbilled receivables, prepaid and other assets, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, accrued payroll and other em
ployee benefits and deferred revenue. Included in our changes in operating assets and liabilities in 2013 was $5.7 million of incentive payments paid to our employees that were earned in 2012. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of
$2.1 million
of noncash expenses principally as the result of the increase in share-based compensation and an increase of
$0.5 million
in net income.
Net cash used in investing activities
. Net cash used in investing activities was
$1.7 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
compared to
$1.0 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
. The increase in net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the corresponding period in 2012 is primarily the result of purchases of property and equipment as a result of infrastructure investment and capitalized internal-use software development costs related to our cloud-based service offerings.
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
. Net cash used in financing activities was
$0.6 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
compared to net cash provided by financing activities of
$0.1 million
for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2012
. The increase for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the corresponding period in 2012 is primarily the result of an increase in net cash provided by the exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights of $0.9 million, offset by a $1.4 million decrease in excess tax benefits as a result of the vesting of restricted stock units and a $0.2 million increase in net cash used in tax withholdings related to the net share settlement of restricted stock units.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations and commitments as disclosed in our Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Credit facility
As of March 31, 2013, there were
$0.2 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the Revolver included in other long term assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three months ended March 31, 2013,
$13,000
of debt issue cost amortization is included in interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
There were
no
outstanding borrowings under the Revolver as of
March 31, 2013
.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our contracts are predominately denominated in U.S. dollars; however, we have contracts denominated in foreign currencies and therefore a portion of our revenue is subject to foreign currency risks. The primary market risk we face is from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Our cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The effect of an immediate 10% adverse change in exchange rates on foreign denominated receivables as of
March 31, 2013
would have resulted in a $0.3 million loss. In addition, the Company has operating subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. However, due to the relatively low volume of payments made by the Company through these foreign subsidiaries, the Company does not believe that it has significant exposure to foreign currency exchange risks. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could harm our results of operations in the future.
We currently do not use derivative financial instruments to mitigate foreign currency exchange risks. We continue to review this issue and may consider hedging certain foreign exchange risks through the use of currency futures or options in future years.
Exposure to Interest Rates
The Company is exposed to market risk for changes in interest rates related to the variable interest rate on borrowings under the Company’s Revolver. As of
March 31, 2013
, the Company had
no
borrowings under the Revolver.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") as of
March 31, 2013
. Based on our evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
March 31, 2013
, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended
March 31, 2013
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
There have been no material changes from the
risk factors
previously described under Item 1A of each of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
We have an ongoing authorization from our Board of Directors to repurchase up to $15.0 million in shares of our common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. As of
March 31, 2013
, $10.0 million remained available for repurchase under the existing repurchase authorization.
We did not make any purchases of our common stock under this program for the three months ended
March 31, 2013
.
None.
None.
None.
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.13(1)
|
Credit Agreement between PROS, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated July 2, 2012.
|
|
|
10.15
|
Form of Market Stock Unit Agreement (2013) under the 2007 Stock Plan.
|
|
|
10.16**
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated May 2, 2013, by and between PROS, Inc., Registrant and Andres Reiner - President and Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
10.17**
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated May 2, 2013, by and between PROS, Inc., Registrant and Charles H. Murphy - Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a).
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
*
|
This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
**
|
Constitutes management contracts or compensatory arrangements.
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 9, 2012
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
PROS HOLDINGS, INC.
|
||
|
Date: May 2, 2013
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Andres Reiner
|
|
|
Andres Reiner
|
||
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
|
Date: May 2, 2013
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Charles H. Murphy
|
|
|
Charles H. Murphy
|
||
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I. Financial InformationItem 1. Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 4. Controls and ProceduresPart II. Other InformationItem 1. Legal ProceedingsItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsItem 3. Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosureItem 5. Other InformationItem 6. Exhibits