QNTO 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2011 | Alphaminr
QUAINT OAK BANCORP INC

QNTO 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011

QUAINT OAK BANCORP INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 form10q.htm FORM 10-Q form10q.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended:
September 30, 2011
OR
[  ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number:
000-52694
QUAINT OAK BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
35-2293957
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
607 Lakeside Drive, Southampton, Pennsylvania 18966
(Address of principal executive offices)
(215) 364-4059
(Registrant’s telephone number)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  [X]    No  [   ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [X]    No   [   ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [  ]
Accelerated filer [  ]
Non-accelerated filer [  ]
Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes [  ]    No   [X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  As of November 14, 2011, 987,126 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.

INDEX
Page
PART I
-
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1:
Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
1
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)
2
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (Unaudited)
3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)
4
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Item 2:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31
Item 3:
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
42
Item 4:
Controls and Procedures
42
PART II
-
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1:
Legal Proceedings
43
Item 1A:
Risk Factors
43
Item 2:
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
43
Item 3:
Defaults upon Senior Securities
43
Item 4:
(Removed and Reserved)
43
Item 5:
Other Information
44
Item 6:
Exhibits
44
SIGNATURES

PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
At September 30,
At December 31,
2011
2010
Assets
(In thousands, except share data)
Due from banks, non-interest-bearing
$ 401 $ 973
Due from banks, interest-bearing
10,093 7,677
Cash and cash equivalents
10,494 8,650
Investment in interest-earning time deposits
8,079 6,001
Investment securities available for sale at fair value (cost-2011
$6,834; 2010 $3,290) 6,757 3,271
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity (fair value-2011
$4,682; 2010 $5,810) 4,287 5,406
Loans held for sale
1,055 -
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses
2011 $754; 2010 $871 74,802 74,710
Accrued interest receivable
523 423
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
649 757
Premises and equipment, net
1,119 1,073
Other real estate owned, net
560 1,191
Prepaid expenses and other assets
674 619
Total Assets
$ 108,999 $ 102,101
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits, interest-bearing
$ 88,437 $ 79,691
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
3,800 5,600
Other borrowings
407 423
Accrued interest payable
96 107
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
470 746
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
256 343
Total Liabilities
93,466 86,910
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock– $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
- -
Common stock – $0.01 par value; 9,000,000 shares
authorized; 1,388,625 issued; 987,126 and 992,436 outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
14 14
Additional paid-in capital
13,488 13,478
Treasury stock, at cost: 2011 401,499 shares; 2010 396,189 shares
(3,683 ) (3,636 )
Unallocated common stock held by:
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
(761 ) (813 )
Recognition & Retention Plan Trust (RRP)
(280 ) (360 )
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
(51 ) (13 )
Retained earnings
6,806 6,521
Total Stockholders' Equity
15,533 15,191
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$ 108,999 $ 102,101
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
For the Three For the Nine
Months Ended Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Interest Income (In thousands, except for share data)
Interest on loans
$ 1,260 $ 1,290 $ 3,751 $ 3,678
Interest on short-term investments and investment securities
129 131 373 376
Total Interest Income
1,389 1,421 4,124 4,054
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits
435 427 1,267 1,259
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances
45 61 149 188
Interest on other borrowings
6 6 18 19
Total Interest Expense
486 494 1,434 1,466
Net Interest Income 903 927 2,690 2,588
Provision for Loan Losses 29 29 85 86
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses 874 898 2,605 2,502
Non-Interest Income
Mortgage banking fees 66 71 195 171
Other fees and services charges 13 13 30 36
Loss on sale of other real estate owned (53 ) - (53 ) -
Other 15 5 50 29
Total Non-Interest Income 41 89 222 236
Non-Interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits
435 347 1,257 1,005
Directors' fees and expenses
57 51 170 155
Occupancy and equipment
60 49 167 139
Professional fees
76 84 229 265
FDIC deposit insurance assessment
(18 ) 38 59 114
Other real estate owned expense
53 72 104 98
Advertising
12 15 35 44
Other
52 46 156 150
Total Non-Interest Expense
727 702 2,177 1,970
Income before Income Taxes
188 285 650 768
Income Taxes
77 112 265 303
Net Income
$ 111 $ 173 $ 385 $ 465
Earnings per share - basic
$ 0.13 $ 0.17 $ 0.44 $ 0.44
Average shares outstanding - basic
878,477 1,014,681 873,539 1,060,602
Earnings per share - diluted
$ 0.13 $ 0.17 $ 0.44 $ 0.44
Average shares outstanding - diluted
880,524 1,016,299 878,393 1,064,789
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Unallocated
Common Stock Common Accumulated
(In thousands, except share Number of
Additional
Stock Held Other
Total
data) Shares Paid-in Treasury by Benefit Comprehensive
Retained
Stockholders’
Outstanding
Amount
Capital
Stock Plans Income
Earnings
Equity
BALANCE – December 31, 2010
992,436 $ 14 $ 13,478 $ (3,636 ) $ (1,173 ) $ (13 ) $ 6,521 $ 15,191
Common stock released by ESOP
1 52 53
Treasury stock purchased (5,310 ) (47 ) (47 )
Stock based compensation expense
89 89
Release of vested common stock by the Recognition and Retention Plan Trust (8,529 shares) (80 ) 80 -
Cash dividends declared
($0.10 per share)
(100 ) (100 )
Net income
385 385
Unrealized loss on securities, net of deferred taxes
(38 ) (38 )
Total comprehensive
income
$ 347
BALANCE – September 30, 2011
987,126 $ 14 $ 13,488 $ (3,683 ) $ (1,041 ) $ (51 ) $ 6,806 $ 15,533
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2011
2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
(In Thousands)
Net income
$ 385 $ 465
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash  (used in) provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses
85 86
Depreciation expense
39 41
Net accretion of securities discounts
(6 ) (7 )
Amortization of deferred loan fees and costs
8 7
Stock-based compensation expense
142 138
Gain on the sale of loans held for sale (103 ) -
Net loss on sale of other real estate owned
53 -
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used ) cash:
Loans held for sale-originations
(6,885 ) -
Loans held for sale-proceeds 5,933 -
Accrued interest receivable
(100 ) (25 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(35 ) 84
Accrued interest payable
(11 ) (14 )
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
(87 ) 125
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities
(582 ) 900
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net increase in investment in interest-earning time deposits
(2,078 ) (3,609 )
Purchase of investment securities available for sale
(5,393 ) (2,775 )
Proceeds from calls of investment securities available for sale
1,850 500
Principal payments received on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
1,124 1,550
Net increase in loans receivable
(825 ) (2,402 )
Net decrease in investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
108 -
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned
1,218 -
Capitalized expenditures on other real estate owned
- (25 )
Purchase of premises and equipment
(85 ) (25 )
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
(4,081 ) (6,786 )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits
8,746 10,887
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(1,800 ) (1,250 )
Repayment of other borrowings
(16 ) (14 )
Dividends paid
(100 ) (103 )
Purchase of treasury stock
(47 ) (1,708 )
Decrease in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
(276 ) (284 )
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
6,507 7,528
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 1,844 1,642
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning of Period
8,650 5,420
Cash and Cash Equivalents – End of Period
$ 10,494 $ 7,062
Supplementary Disclosure of Cash Flow and Non-Cash Information:
Cash payments for interest
$ 1,445 $ 1,480
Cash payments for income taxes
$ 405 $ 235
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
$ 640 $ 260
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Financial Presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Quaint Oak Bank along with its wholly owned subsidiaries.  At September 30, 2011, the Bank has four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, Quaint Oak Real Estate, LLC, Quaint Oak Abstract, LLC, and Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC, each a Pennsylvania limited liability company.  The mortgage, real estate and abstract companies offer mortgage banking, real estate sales and title abstract services, respectively, in the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania, and began operation in July 2009.  The insurance agency is currently inactive.  In October 2010, the mortgage company also commenced operations at the Bank’s main office.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The Bank is subject to regulation by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.  Pursuant to the Bank’s election under Section 10(l) of the Home Owners’ Loan Act, the Company is a savings and loan holding company regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.  The market area served by the Bank is principally Bucks County, Pennsylvania and to a lesser extent, Montgomery and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania.  In February 2010, the Bank opened a branch banking office in the Lehigh Valley area of Pennsylvania.  The principal deposit products offered by the Bank are certificates of deposit, passbook savings accounts, statement savings accounts and eSavings accounts.  Loan products offered are fixed and adjustable rate residential and commercial mortgages, construction loans, home equity loans, auto loans, and lines of credit.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q, as applicable to a smaller reporting company.  Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited; but in the opinion of management include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation thereof.  The balances as of December 31, 2010 have been derived from the audited financial statements.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Quaint Oak Bancorp’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The Company’s most significant estimates are the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of investment and mortgage-backed securities, valuation of other real estate owned, and the valuation of deferred tax assets.
5

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Loans Receivable. Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees.  Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance.  Loan origination fees and costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans.  The Bank is generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the loan.
The loans receivable portfolio is segmented into residential loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans and consumer loans.  The residential loan segment has two classes: one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans and one-to-four residential family non-owner occupied loans.  The commercial real estate loan segment consists of the following classes: multi-family (five or more) residential, commercial real estate and commercial lines of credit.  Construction loans are generally granted for the purpose of building a single residential home.  The consumer loan segment consists of the following classes: home equity loans and consumer non-real estate loans.  Included in the home equity class are home equity loans and home equity lines of credit.  Included in the consumer non-real estate loans are loans secured by saving accounts and auto loans.
The accrual of interest is generally discontinued when principal or interest has become 90 days past due unless the loan is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured.  When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses.  Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal.  Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans receivable. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the
6

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.  Residential mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish a specific reserve for loss on any delinquent loan when it determines that a loss is probable. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.
A loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary or permanent reduction in payments or interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date at less than a current market rate of interest. Loans classified as TDRs are designated as impaired.
For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.
7

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for all loans (except one-to-four family residential owner- occupied loans) where the total amount outstanding to any borrower or group of borrowers exceeds $500,000, or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
Loans Held for Sale . Loans originated by the Bank’s mortgage banking subsidiary, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, are intended for sale in the secondary market and are carried at the lower of cost or fair value (LOCOM). Gains and losses on loan sales (sales proceeds minus carrying value) are recorded in noninterest income, and direct loan origination costs and fees are deferred at origination of the loan and are recognized in noninterest income upon sale of the loan.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock . Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system to hold restricted stock of its district Federal Home Loan Bank according to a predetermined formula. FHLB stock is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. When evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the stock. We evaluate our holdings of FHLB stock for impairment each reporting period. No impairment charges were recognized on FHLB stock during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and restricting the repurchase of capital stock, to preserve capital.  On October 29, 2010, the FHLB of Pittsburgh resumed the repurchase of capital stock and repurchased 39,900 shares of capital stock from the Bank at $1.00 per share. During the quarters ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011 the FHLB repurchased 37,900, 36,000 and 34,200 shares, respectively, of capital stock at $1.00 per share.  Subsequent to September 30, 2011, on October 28, 2011 the FHLB repurchased an additional 32,500 shares of capital stock at $1.00 per share.
Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned or foreclosed assets are comprised of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure and loans classified as in-substance foreclosures.  A loan is classified as in-substance foreclosure when the Bank has taken possession of the collateral regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings take place.  Other real estate properties are initially recorded at fair value, net of estimated selling costs at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the real estate is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell.  Net
8

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
revenue and expenses from operations and additions to the valuation allowance are included in other expenses.  Other real estate owned at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $560,000 and $1.2 million, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation. Compensation expense for share-based compensation awards is based on the grant date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
At September 30, 2011, the Company has two share-based plans; the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan (“RRP”) and the 2008 Stock Option Plan.  Awards under both plans were made in May 2008.  These plans are more fully described in Note 7.
The Company also has an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”).  This plan is more fully described in Note 7.  As ESOP shares are committed to be released and allocated among participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market price of the shares over the period earned.
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income.  Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, the only components of comprehensive income were net income and unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available for sale securities.  Unrealized holding losses were $51,000 and $38,000, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.  Unrealized holding gains were $10,000 and $19,000, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
Earnings per Share. Amounts reported in earnings per share reflect earnings available to common stockholders’ for the period divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, exclusive of unearned ESOP shares, unvested restricted stock (RRP) shares and treasury shares.  Stock options and unvested restricted stock are regarded as potential common stock and are considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations to the extent they would have a dilutive effect if converted to common stock, computed using the “treasury stock” method.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, all outstanding stock options (107,570 options) were antidilutive.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which updates ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The updated guidance added new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarified existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The amended guidance in ASU 2010-06 was effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchase, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted the amended guidance, except for the requirement effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, on January 1, 2010. The Company adopted the additional requirement on January 1, 2011. The adoptions did not have any impact on our financial position or results of operations.
9

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses , which updated ASC 310, Receivables. The updated guidance requires more robust and disaggregated disclosures about the credit quality of an entity’s financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses, including a rollforward schedule of the allowance for credit losses for the period on a portfolio segment basis, as well as additional information about the aging and credit quality of receivables by class of financing receivables as of the end of the period. The new and amended disclosures that relate to information as of the end of a reporting period are effective for the Company as of December 31, 2010. The disclosures that include information for activity that occurs during a reporting period were effective for the first interim reporting period beginning after December 31, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, which updates ASC 310. This updated guidance clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor must separately conclude that both of the following exist: 1) the restructuring constitutes a concession; and 2) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulty. The update clarifies the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession to note that if a debtor does not otherwise have access to funds at a market rate for debt with similar characteristics as the restructured debt, the restructuring would be considered to be at a below-market rate, which may indicate that the creditor has granted a concession. Additionally, a temporary or permanent increase in the contractual interest rate as a result of a restructuring does not preclude the restructuring from being considered a concession because the new contractual interest rate on the restructured debt could still be below the market interest rate for new debt with similar characteristics. Furthermore, a restructuring that results in a delay in payment that is insignificant is not a concession. The update also clarifies the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulty to note that a creditor may conclude that a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, even though the debtor is not currently in payment default. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The adoption of this new guidance did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations, as we have already implemented these principles in our evaluations of TDRs.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The intent of this standard is to increase the prominence of comprehensive income in the financial statements.  This standard requires the components of comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  The single format would include the traditional income statement and the components of other comprehensive income, total other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income.  In the two statement approach, the first statement would be the traditional income statement, which would be immediately followed by a separate statement which would include the components of other comprehensive income, total other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income.  The amendments in this ASU will be applied retrospectively, and will be required for the Corporation beginning in the first quarter 2012.
Reclassifications. Certain items in the 2010 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in the 2011 consolidated financial statements. Such reclassifications did not have a material impact on the presentation of the overall financial statements.
10

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 – Investment Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below (in thousands):
September 30, 2011
Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agency securities
$ 3,754 $ 2 $ - $ 3,756
Corporate securities
1,497 - (55 ) 1,442
Short-term bond fund
1,070 - (19 ) 1,051
Limited-term bond fund
513 - (5 ) 508
$ 6,834 $ 2 $ ( 79 ) $ 6,757
December 31, 2010
Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agency securities
$ 1,750 $ 2 $ (15 ) $ 1,737
Short-term bond fund
1,035 2 - 1,037
Limited-term bond fund
505 - (8 ) 497
$ 3,290 $ 4 $ ( 23 ) $ 3,271
The amortized cost and fair value of available for sale debt securities at September 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
(In Thousands)
Due in one year or less
$ 2,255 $ 2,256
Due after one year through five years
1,247 1,200
Due after five years through ten years
1,749 1,742
$ 5,251 $ 5,198

11

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 – Investment Securities (Continued)
The following table shows the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):

September 30, 2011
Less than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or Greater
Total
Number of
Securities
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
U.S. Government agency securities
1
$
500
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
500
$
-
Corporate securities
5
1,442
(55
)
-
-
1,442
(55
)
Short-term bond fund
1
1,051
(19
)
-
-
1,051
(19
)
Limited-term bond fund
1
507
(5
)
-
-
507
(5
)
Total
8
$
3,500
$
(79
)
$
-
$
-
$
3,500
$
(79
)

At September 30, 2011, there were six debt securities in a gross unrealized loss position that at such date had an aggregated depreciation of 2.75% from the Company’s amortized cost basis.  Management believes that the estimated fair value of the securities disclosed above is primarily dependent on the movement of market interest rates.  Management evaluated the length and time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer.  The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until maturity and the Company does not believe it will sell or be required to sell such securities prior to the recovery of the amortized cost basis.  Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of September 30, 2011 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
At September 30, 2011, there were two bond funds in an unrealized loss position that at such date had an aggregated depreciation of 1.53% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. Management believes that the estimated fair value of the securities disclosed above is primarily dependent on the movement of market interest rates.  Management evaluated the length and time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer.  The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until the anticipated recovery of fair value occurs. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of September 30, 2011 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
There were no impairment charges recognized during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.






12

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 – Mortgage -backed Securities Held to Maturity
The amortized cost and fair value of mortgage -backed securities held to maturity at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below (in thousands):
September 30, 2011
Amortized
Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
Held to Maturity:
FNMA pass-through certificates
$ 2,277 $ 225 $ - $ 2,502
FHLMC pass-through certificates
2,010 170 - 2,180
$ 4,287 $ 395 $ - $ 4,682
December 31, 2010
Amortized
Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
Held to Maturity:
FNMA pass-through certificates
$ 2,803 $ 222 $ - $ 3,025
FHLMC pass-through certificates
2,603 182 - 2,785
$ 5,406 $ 404 $ - $ 5,810








13

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses

Loans receivable , net consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
Real estate loans:
One-to four-family residential:
Owner occupied
$ 12,489 $ 13,428
Non-owner occupied
28,073 26,263
Total one-to-four family residential
40,562 39,691
Multi-family (five or more)  residential
3,612 3,226
Commercial real estate
18,162 18,773
Construction
5,787 5,773
Commercial lines of  credit
1,661 1,854
Home equity loans
5,687 6,181
Total real estate loans
75,471 75,498
Auto loans
45 75
Loans secured by deposits
62 15
Total loans
75,578 75,588
Deferred loan fees and costs
(22 ) (7 )
Allowance for loan losses
(754 ) (871 )
Net loans
$ 74,802 $ 74,710

Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
September 30,
2011
September 30,
2010
Balance, beginning of the year
$ 871 $ 835
Provision for loan losses
85 86
Charge-offs
(202 ) -
Recoveries
- -
Net charge-offs
(202 ) -
Balance, end of period
$ 754 $ 921






14

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

September 30, 2011
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 11,618 $ 7 $ 300 $ 564 $ 12,489
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
26,653 176 1,071 173 28,073
Multi-family residential
3,410 202 - - 3,612
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
19,180 422 221 - 19,823
Construction
5,547 - 240 - 5,787
Home equity
5,051 11 625 - 5,687
Consumer non-real estate
95 12 - - 107
$ 71,554 $ 830 $ 2,457 $ 737 $ 75,578


December 31, 2010
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 12,139 $ 742 $ 79 $ 468 $ 13,428
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
24,700 109 1,079 375 26,263
Multi-family residential
3,022 204 - - 3,226
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
20,202 318 107 - 20,627
Construction
5,773 - - - 5,773
Home equity
5,757 350 74 - 6,181
Consumer non-real estate
75 - 15 - 90
$ 71,668 $ 1,723 $ 1,354 $ 843 $ 75,588

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.




15

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The following tables summarize information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
September 30, 2011
Unpaid Average Interest
Recorded Principal Related Recorded Income
Investment
Balance Allowance
Investment
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
- - - - -
Multi-family residential
- - - - -
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
- - - - -
Construction
- - - - -
Home equity
- - - - -
Consumer non-real estate
- - - - -
With an allowance recorded:
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 864 $ 864 $ 29 $ 869 $ 12
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
1,244 1,244 49 1,248 45
Multi-family residential and lines of credit
- - - - -
Commercial real estate
221 221 11 222 8
Construction
240 240 2 240 10
Home equity
625 625 48 631 23
Consumer non-real estate
- - - - -
Total:
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 864 $ 864 $ 29 $ 869 $ 12
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
1,244 1,244 49 1,248 45
Multi-family residential and lines of credit
- - - - -
Commercial real estate
221 221 11 222 8
Construction
240 240 2 240 10
Home equity
625 625 48 631 23
Consumer non-real estate
- - - - -










16

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
December 31, 2010
Unpaid Average Interest
Recorded Principal Related Recorded Income
Investment
Balance Allowance
Investment
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
- - - - -
Multi-family residential
- - - - -
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
- - - - -
Construction
- - - - -
Home equity
- - - - -
Consumer non-real estate
- - - - -
With an allowance recorded:
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 547 $ 547 $ 108 $ 547 $ 12
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
1,454 1,454 136 1,462 76
Multi-family residential and lines of credit
- - - - -
Commercial real estate
107 107 1 108 6
Construction
- - - - -
Home equity
74 74 25 75 5
Consumer non-real estate
15 15 1 18 1
Total:
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 547 $ 547 $ 108 $ 547 $ 12
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
1,454 1,454 136 1,462 76
Multi-family residential and lines of credit
- - - - -
Commercial real estate
107 107 1 108 6
Construction
- - - - -
Home equity
74 74 25 75 5
Consumer non-real estate
15 15 1 18 1
At September 30, 2011, the Company had nine loans totaling $940,000 identified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs).  All nine loans are classified as impaired with one loan in the amount of $71,000 on non-accrual status.  Any TDR that is placed on non-accrual is not reverted back to accruing status until the borrower makes timely payments as contracted for at least six months and future collection under the revised terms is probable. None of the restructurings were made under a government assistance program. These restructurings were allowed in an effort to maximize the Company’s ability to collect on loans where borrowers were experiencing financial difficulty. All the Company’s TDRs as of September 30, 2011 have modifications with terms of interest-only payments for a period of six months. In some cases the modification terms may include a small payment of principal in addition to interest.  There were no new TDR’s identified as a result of the Company’s adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The following table presents the Company’s TDR loans as of September 30, 2011(dollar amounts in thousands):
September 30, 2011
Number of Recorded Non- Related
Contracts
Investment
Accrual
Accruing
Allowance
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
1 $ 71 $ 71 $ - $ 1
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
5 619 - 619 16
Multi-family residential
- - - - -
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
- - - - -
Construction
- - - - -
Home equity
3 250 - 250 3
Consumer non-real estate
- - - - -
Total
9 $ 940 $ 71 $ 869 $ 20
17

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The contractual aging of the TDRs in the table above as of September 30, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2011
Current &
Past Due
Greater
Less than Past Due than 90 Non-
30 Days 30-89 Days Days Accrual Total
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ - $ - $ - $ 71 $ 71
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
311 - 308 - 619
Multi-family residential
- - - - -
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
- - - - -
Construction
- - - - -
Home equity
- 183 67 - 250
Consumer non-real estate
- - - - -
Total
$ 311 $ 183 $ 375 $ 71 $ 940

The following table shows the data for TDR activity for the periods indicated in 2011(dollar amounts in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Pre-Modification Post- Modification Pre-Modification Post- Modification
Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding
Number of
Recorded Recorded
Number of
Recorded Recorded
Contracts
Investment
Investment
Contracts
Investment
Investment
One-to-four family residential
owner occupied
- $ - $ - - $ - $ -
One-to-four family residential
non- owner occupied
- - - 4 309 307
Multi-family residential
Commercial real estate and lines
of credit
- - - -
Construction
- - - - - -
Home equity
2 140 140 3 251 250
Consumer non-real estate
- - - - - -
Total
2 $ 140 $ 140 7 $ 560 $ 557


The reserve for an impaired TDR loan is based upon the present value of the future expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective rate or upon the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell, if the loan is deemed collateral dependent. At September 30, 2011, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified as TDRs.

The general practice of the Bank is to work with borrowers so that they are able to pay back their loan in full. If a borrower continues to be delinquent or cannot meet the terms of a TDR modification and the loan is determined to be uncollectible, the loan will be charged off.  There were no loans classified as TDR’s during the previous 12 months which have defaulted during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011.

18

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

Following is a summary, by loan portfolio class, of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and recorded investment in loans receivable as of September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
1-4 Family Residential Owner Occupied
1-4 Family Residential Non-Owner Occupied
Multi-Family
Residential
Commercial Real Estate and Lines of Credit
Construction
Home Equity
Consumer Non-Real Estate
Unallocated
Total
For the Three
Months Ended
September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$ 98 $ 329 $ 21 $ 137 $ 33 $ 97 $ 1 $ 43 $ 759
Charge-offs
(34 ) - - - - - - - (34 )
Recoveries
- - - - - - - - -
Provision
52 (25 ) 4 11 6 (11 ) - (8 ) 29
Ending balance
$ 116 $ 304 $ 25 $ 148 $ 39 $ 86 $ 1 $ 35 $ 754
For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$ 185 $ 335 $ 23 $ 155 $ 40 $ 92 $ 1 $ 40 $ 871
Charge-offs
(127 ) (75 ) - - - - - - (202 )
Recoveries
- - - - - - - - -
Provision
58 44 2 (7 ) (1 ) (6 ) - (5 ) 85
Ending balance
$ 116 $ 304 $ 25 $ 148 $ 39 $ 86 $ 1 $ 35 $ 754
Ending balance: Individually
evaluated for impairment
$ 29 $ 49 $ - $ 11 $ 2 $ 48 $ - $ - $ 139
Ending balance:
Collectively
evaluated for impairment
$ 87 $ 255 $ 25 $ 137 $ 37 $ 38 $ 1 $ 35 $ 615
As of September 30, 2011
Loans receivable:
Ending balance $ 12,489 $ 28,073 $ 3,612 $ 19,823 $ 5,787 $ 5,687 $ 107 $ 75,578
Ending balance:
Individually
evaluated for
impairment
$ 864 $ 1,244 $ - $ 221 $ 240 $ 625 $ - $ 3,194
Ending balance:
Collectively
evaluated for
impairment
$ 11,625 $ 26,829 $ 3,612 $ 19,602 $ 5,547 $ 5,062 $ 107 $ 72,384
19

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans receivable for the year ended December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
December 31, 2010
1-4 Family Residential Owner Occupied
1-4 Family Residential Non-Owner Occupied
Multi-Family
Residential
Commercial Real Estate and Lines of Credit
Construction
Home Equity
Consumer Non-Real Estate
Unallocated
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
$ 83 $ 202 $ 22 $ 194 $ 35 $ 41 $ 1 $ 256 $ 834
Charge-offs
- (78 ) - - - - - - (78 )
Recoveries
- - - - - - - - -
Provision
102 211 1 (39 ) 5 51 - (216 ) 115
Ending balance
$ 185 $ 335 $ 23 $ 155 $ 40 $ 92 $ 1 $ 40 $ 871
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment
$ 108 $ 136 $ - $ 1 $ - $ 25 $ 1 $ - $ 271
Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment
$ 77 $ 199 $ 23 $ 154 $ 40 $ 67 $ - $ 40 $ 600
Loans receivable:
Ending balance $ 13,428 $ 26,263 $ 3,226 $ 20,627 $ 5,773 6,181 $ 90 $ 75,588
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 547 $ 1,454 $ - $ 107 $ - 74 $ 15 $ 2,197
Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 12,881 $ 24,809 $ 3,226 $ 20,520 $ 5,773 6,107 $ 75 $ 73,391



20

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

For all classes of loans receivable, the accrual of interest is generally discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed and charged against income in the current year.  Interest received on nonaccrual loans including impaired loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (as determined by management) and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments.

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

September 30,
2011
December 31, 2010
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 809 $ 539
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied
625 422
Multi-family residential
- -
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
221 -
Construction
- -
Home equity
261 23
Consumer non-real estate
- -
$ 1,916 $ 984

Non-performing loans, which consist of non-accruing loans plus accruing loans 90 days or more past due, amounted to $3.0 and $1.5 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  For the delinquent loans in our portfolio, we have considered our ability to collect the past due interest, as well as the principal balance of the loan, in order to determine whether specific loans should be placed on non-accrual status. In cases where our evaluations have determined that the principal and interest balances are collectible, we have continued to accrue interest.

For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately $6,000 and $9,000 in interest income was recognized on non-accrual loans. Interest income foregone on non-accrual loans was approximately $29,000 and $26,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately $26,000 and $11,000 in interest income was recognized on non-accrual loans. Interest income foregone on non-accrual loans was approximately $64,000 and $82,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.






21

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

September 30, 2011
30-90
Days Past Due
Greater
than 90
Days
Total
Past Due
Current
Total Loans Receivable
Loans Receivable >
90 Days and Accruing
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 517 $ 68 $ 585 $ 11,904 $ 12,489 $ 68
One-to-four family residential non-owner
occupied
977 371 1,348 26,725 28,073 371
Multi-family residential
- 202 202 3,410 3,612 202
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
1,609 304 1,913 17,910 19,823 304
Construction
570 - 570 5,217 5,787 -
Home equity
241 131 372 5,315 5,687 131
Consumer non-real estate
34 - 34 73 107 -
$ 3,948 $ 1,076 $ 5,024 $ 70,554 $ 75,578 $ 1,076
December 31, 2010
30-90
Days Past Due
Greater
than 90
Days
Total
Past Due
Current
Total Loans Receivable
Loans Receivable >
90 Days and Accruing
One-to-four family residential owner occupied
$ 810 $ 61 $ 871 $ 12,557 $ 13,428 $ 61
One-to-four family residential non-owner
occupied
1,106 353 1,459 24,804 26,263 353
Multi-family residential
204 - 204 3,022 3,226 -
Commercial real estate and lines of credit
1,061 108 1,169 19,458 20,627 108
Construction
- - - 5,773 5,773 -
Home equity
437 - 437 5,744 6,181 -
Consumer non-real estate
15 - 15 75 90 -
$ 3,633 $ 522 $ 4,155 $ 71,433 $ 75,588 $ 522

Note 5 – Deposits

Deposits consist of the following classifications (in thousands):

September 30,
2011
December 31,
2010
Passbook savings accounts
$ 2,844 $ 3,079
Statement savings accounts
7,049 6,798
eSavings accounts
2,987 2,253
Certificates of deposit
75,557 67,561
Total deposits
$ 88,437 $ 79,691
22

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 –Borrowings

Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of the following at September 30, 2011 (in thousands):

Maturity Period
Amount
Weighted
Interest
Rate
1 to 12 months
$ 1,800 3.98 %
13 to 24 months
2,000 4.19 %
Total
$ 3,800 4.09 %
In June 2009, the Company borrowed $450,000 from a commercial bank to finance the purchase of a building in Allentown, Pennsylvania which serves as the offices for the three active subsidiaries and a branch banking office which opened in February 2010.  The loan has an interest rate of 5.75%, matures on July 1, 2014 and is amortizing over 180 months. The balance on the loan was $407,000 and $423,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. On November 10, 2011, the Company paid-off this loan in its entirety.

Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

The Company adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) during fiscal 2007 for the benefit of employees who meet the eligibility requirements of the plan.  Using proceeds from a loan from the Company, the ESOP purchased 8%, or 111,090 shares of the Company’s then outstanding common stock in the open market at an average price of $9.35 for a total of $1.0 million.  The Bank makes cash contributions to the ESOP on a quarterly basis sufficient to enable the ESOP to make the required loan payments to the Company.  The loan bears an interest rate of 7.75% per annum, with principal and interest to be paid quarterly in equal installments over 15 years. The loan is secured by the unallocated shares of common stock held by the ESOP.

Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the ESOP are held in a suspense account and reported as unallocated common stock held by the ESOP in stockholders’ equity until released for allocation to participants.  As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral and are allocated to each eligible participant based on the ratio of each such participant’s base compensation to the total base compensation of eligible plan participants.  As the unearned shares are committed to be released and allocated among participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market value of the shares, and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations.  During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized $17,000 and $52,000 of ESOP expense, respectively. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized $16,000 and $50,000 of ESOP expense, respectively.

Recognition & Retention Plan

In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan (the “RRP”) and Trust Agreement.  In order to fund the RRP, the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan Trust (the “RRP Trust”) acquired 55,545 shares of the Company’s stock in the open market at an average price of $9.36 totaling $520,000.  Pursuant to the RRP, 43,324 shares acquired by the RRP Trust were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008, with 12,221 shares remaining available for future grant.  Due to forfeiture of shares by certain employees in addition to unawarded shares, as of September 30, 2011, 12,459 shares remain available for future

23

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)

Recognition & Retention Plan (Continued)

grant.  The RRP share awards have vesting periods from five to seven years.  On May 14, 2009, the first awards vested totaling 8,588 shares.

A summary of the status of the shares under the RRP as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

September 30, 2011
September 30, 2010
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at the beginning of the year
25,969 $ 9.05 34,498 $ 9.05
Granted
- - - -
Vested
(8,529 ) 9.05 (8,529 ) 9.05
Forfeited
- - - -
Unvested at the end of the period
17,440 $ 9.05 25,969 $ 9.05


The weighted average grant date fair value is the last sale price as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board on May 14, 2008.  Compensation expense on the RRP shares granted is recognized ratably over the five to seven year vesting period in an amount which is equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, $19,000 in compensation expense was recognized, respectively.  A tax benefit of approximately $6,000 was recognized during each of these periods.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, $58,000 and $57,000 in compensation expense was recognized, respectively.  A tax benefit of approximately $20,000 and $19,000 was recognized during the period ending September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  As of September 30, 2011, approximately $129,000 in additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 1.7 years.


Stock Options

In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”).  The Option Plan authorizes the grant of stock options to officers, employees and directors of the Company to acquire 138,863 shares of common stock with an exercise price no less than the fair market value on the date of the grant.  The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined to grant the stock options in May 2008 at an exercise price equal to $10.00 per share which is higher than the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date.  All incentive stock options issued under the Option Plan are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.  Options will become vested and exercisable over a five to seven year period and are generally exercisable for a period of ten years after the grant date.  Pursuant to the Option Plan, 108,311 stock options were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008. Due to forfeiture of stock options by certain employees in addition to unawarded stock options, as of September 30, 2011, 31,293 stock options remain available for future grant.



24

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)

Stock Options (Continued)

A summary of option activity under the Company’s Option Plan as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

September 30, 2011
September 30, 2010
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
Outstanding at the beginning of the year
107,570 $ 10.00 107,718 $ 10.00 7.4
Granted
-- -- -- -- --
Exercised
-- -- -- -- --
Forfeited
-- -- (148 ) -- --
Outstanding at the end of the period
107,570 $ 10.00 107,570 $ 10.00 6.6
Exercisable at the end of the period
63,999 $ 10.00 42,666 6.6

Approximately $10,000 and $31,000 was recognized in compensation expense for the 2008 Option Plan for the three and nine months, respectively, for both the September 30, 2011 and 2010 periods.  A tax benefit of approximately $2,000 and $6,000, respectively, was recognized during these periods.  As of September 30, 2011, approximately $69,000 in additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 1.7 years.

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.  In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of FASB ASC 820, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices.  However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments.  In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.  Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.  Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate.  In such circumstances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment.  The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.
The fair value guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
25

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

Level 1:
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2:
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3:
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The table below presents the balances of assets presented at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
September 30, 2011
Total Fair Value
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Government agency securities
$ 3,756 $ - $ 3,756 $ -
Corporate securities
1,442 1,442 - -
Short-term bond fund
1,051 1,051 - -
Limited-term bond fund
508 508 - -
$ 6,757 $ 3,001 $ 3,756 $ -
December 31, 2010
Total Fair Value
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Government agency securities
$ 1,737 $ - $ 1,737 $ -
Short-term bond fund
1,037 1,037 - -
Limited-term bond fund
497 497 - -
$ 3,271 $ 1,534 $ 1,737 $ -





26


Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still held at the end of the period, the following tables provide the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
September 30, 2011
Carrying Amount
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Impaired loans
$ 3,055 $ - $ - $ 3,055
Other real estate owned
$ 560 $ - $ - $ 560
December 31, 2010
Carrying Amount
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 3)
Impaired loans
$ 1,926 $ - $ - $ 1,926
Other real estate owned
$ 1,191 $ - $ - $ 1,191
A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in the amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired. We establish an allowance on certain impaired loans for the amount by which the discounted cash flows, observable market price or fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent, is lower than the carrying value of the loan. Fair value is generally based upon independent market prices or appraised value of the collateral. During the periods presented, loan impairment was evaluated based on the fair value of the loans’ collateral. Our appraisals are typically performed by independent third party appraisers, and are obtained as soon as practicable once indicators of possible impairment are identified. Our impaired loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are included in Level 3 fair value based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure are to be sold and are carried at fair value less estimated cost to sell.  Fair value is based upon independent market prices or appraised value of the property, net of selling costs.  These assets are included in Level 3 fair value based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
Cash and Cash Equivalents (Carried at Cost). The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

27

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

Interest Earning Time Deposits (Carried at Cost). Fair values for interest-earning time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.  The Company generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities. The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
Loans Held for Sale. Fair values of loans held for sale are determined based on the negotiated service release premium at the time of funding the loan.
Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost). The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans.  Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal.  Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock (Carried at Cost). The carrying amount of restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (Carried at Cost). The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost). The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Short-Term Borrowings (Carried at Cost). The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values
Long-Term Debt and Other Borrowings (Carried at Cost). Fair values of FHLB advances and other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.  These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.
28

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (Disclosed at Cost). Fair values for the Bank’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.
The following information is an estimate of the fair value of a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities.  Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

September 30, 2011
December 31, 2010
Carrying Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
Carrying Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
(In Thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 10,494 $ 10,494 $ 8,650 $ 8,650
Investment in interest-earning time deposits
8,079 8,167 6,001 6,019
Investment securities available for sale
6,757 6,757 3,271 3,271
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
4,287 4,682 5,406 5,810
Loans held for sale
1,055 1,055 - -
Loans receivable, net
74,802 76,839 74,710 76,212
Investment in FHLB stock
649 649 757 757
Accrued interest receivable
523 523 423 423
Liabilities:
Deposits
88,437 90,002 79,691 80,526
FHLB advances, long-term
2,000 2,118 3,800 4,020
FHLB advances, short-term
1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800
Other borrowings
407 407 423 423
Accrued interest payable
96 96 107 107
Off-balance sheet financial instruments
- - - -
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on many judgments.

These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.  Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments

29

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.  Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include deferred income taxes and premises and equipment.  In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.
30

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements Are Subject to Change

We make certain statements in this document as to what we expect may happen in the future. These statements usually contain the words "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," "anticipate," "intend" or similar expressions. Because these statements look to the future, they are based on our current expectations and beliefs. Actual results or events may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. You should be aware that our current expectations and beliefs as to future events are subject to change at any time, and we can give you no assurances that the future events will actually occur.

General

The Company was formed in connection with the Bank’s conversion to a stock savings bank completed on July 3, 2007.  The Company’s results of operations are dependent primarily on the results of the Bank, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  The Bank’s results of operations depend, to a large extent, on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its loan and investment portfolios and the cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings.  Results of operations are also affected by provisions for loan losses, fee income and other non-interest income and non-interest expense.  Non-interest expense principally consists of compensation, directors’ fees and expenses, office occupancy and equipment expense, professional fees, FDIC deposit insurance assessment and other expenses.  Our results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.  Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.

At September 30, 2011 the Bank had four subsidiaries, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, Quaint Oak Real Estate, LLC, Quaint Oak Abstract, LLC, and Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC, each a Pennsylvania limited liability company. The mortgage, real estate and abstract companies offer mortgage banking, real estate sales and title abstract services, respectively, in the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania, and began operation in July 2009. The insurance agency is currently inactive.  The mortgage company also began operating at our main office in October 2010.  In connection with the expansion into these activities, the Company acquired an office building in Allentown, Pennsylvania from which the subsidiaries operate.  The Bank also opened a new branch office at this location in February 2010.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices within the banking industry. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements require certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions, which are believed to be reasonable, based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the periods presented. The following accounting policies comprise those that management believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. These policies require numerous estimates or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or may be subject to variations which may significantly affect our reported results and financial condition for the period or in future periods.


31


Allowance for Loan Losses .  The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.  Residential mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish a specific reserve for loss on any delinquent loan when it determines that a loss is probable. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.

32

A loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary or permanent reduction in payments or interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date at less than a current market rate of interest. Loans classified as TDRs are designated as impaired.

For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.

The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for all loans (except one-to-four family residential owner-occupied loans) where the total amount outstanding to any borrower or group of borrowers exceeds $500,000, or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities. Securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. To determine whether a loss in value is other-than-temporary, management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the decline and whether or not management intends to sell or expects that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to an anticipated recovery of the fair value. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value for a debt security is determined to be other-than-temporary, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, except for equity securities, where the full amount of the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings.

33

Income Taxes .  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method.  Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.  The realization of our deferred tax assets principally depends upon our achieving projected future taxable income.  We may change our judgments regarding future profitability due to future market conditions and other factors.  We may adjust our deferred tax asset balances if our judgments change.


Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

General. The Company’s total assets at September 30, 2011 were $109.0 million, an increase of $6.9 million, or 6.8%, from $102.1 million at December 31, 2010. This growth in total assets was primarily due to increases in investment securities available for sale of $3.5 million, investment in interest-earning time deposits of $2.1 million, cash and cash equivalents of $1.8 million, and loans held for sale of $1.1 million.  Offsetting these increases was principal payments from mortgage-backed securities held to maturity of $1.1 million and a decrease in other real estate owned of $631,000.  Asset growth for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was funded by an $8.7 million increase in deposits.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents increased $1.8 million, or 21.3%, from $8.7 million at December 31, 2010 to $10.5 million at September 30, 2011 as deposits and principal payments on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity and loans were invested in liquid money market accounts due to continued slow loan demand and a flat yield curve.

Investment in Interest-Earning Time Deposits. Investment in interest-earning time deposits increased $2.1 million, or 34.6%, from $6.0 million at December 31, 2010 to $8.1 million at September 30, 2011 as the Company used this investment as a means to deploy excess liquidity.

Investment Securities. Investment securities available for sale increased $3.5 million, or 106.6%, from $3.3 million at December 31, 2010 to $6.8 million at September 30, 2011 as the Company invested excess liquidity into this investment category.  During this same period, mortgage-backed securities held to maturity decreased $1.1 million, or 20.7%, from $5.4 million to $4.3 million at September 30, 2011, due to principal payments on these securities.

Loans Held for Sale. Loans held for sale totaled $1.1 million at September 30, 2011 compared to none at December 31, 2010, as the Bank’s subsidiary, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, began originating loans for sale in the secondary market in the first half of 2011.

Loans Receivable, Net. Loans receivable, net, increased $92,000, or 0.1%, to $74.8 million at September 30, 2011 from $74.7 million at December 31, 2010.  Increases within the portfolio occurred in the one-to-four family residential non-owner occupied category which increased $1.8 million, or 6.9%, and in the multi-family category which increased $386,000, or 12.0%.  Also contributing to the net increase was a $117,000, or 13.4% decline in the allowance for loan losses.  These increases were primarily offset by a $939,000, or 7.0% decrease in one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans, a $611,000, or 3.3% decrease in commercial real estate loans, a $494,000, or 8.0% decrease in home equity loans, and a $193,000, or 10.4% decrease in commercial lines of credit.  Decreases in these loan categories are attributable to reduced loan demand due to the current economic environment, normal amortization and pay-offs, and in the case of one-to-four family residential owner occupied category, the transfer of a $468,000 loan to other real estate owned.  The decline in the allowance for loan losses was due to charge-offs totaling $202,000 on four outstanding loans previously reserved for prior to transferring them into other real estate owned, offset by an $85,000 increase in the allowance for loan losses through the provision for loan losses.
34

Deposits. Total interest-bearing deposits increased $8.7 million, or 11.0%, to $88.4 million at September 30, 2011 from $79.7 million at December 31, 2010. This growth in deposits was attributable to increases in certificates of deposit of $8.0 million, eSavings accounts of $734,000, and statement savings accounts of $251,000.  These increases were offset by a decrease in passbook savings accounts of $235,000. The increase in certificates of deposit was primarily due to the competitive interest rates offered by the Bank and investors continuing to seek the safety of insured bank deposits. In addition to funding asset growth, the increase in deposits was used to payoff $1.8 million in Federal Home Loan Bank term borrowings.

Other Borrowings. In June 2009, the Company borrowed $450,000 from a commercial bank to finance the acquisition of a building in Allentown, Pennsylvania which serves as the offices for the Bank’s subsidiaries which began operation in July 2009 and branch banking office that opened in February 2010.  The loan has an interest rate of 5.75%, matures on July 1, 2014 and is amortizing over 180 months. The balance on the loan at September 30, 2011 was $407,000.

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity increased $342,000 to $15.5 million at September 30, 2011 from $15.2 million at December 31, 2010. Contributing to the increase was net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 of $385,000, amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans of $89,000, and common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan of $53,000. These increases were offset by dividends paid of $100,000, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $38,000, and the purchase of 5,310 shares of the Company’s stock as part of the Company’s stock repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of $47,000.


Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

General. Net income amounted to $111,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $62,000, or 35.8%, compared to net income of $173,000 for three months ended September 30, 2010.  The decrease in net income on a comparative quarterly basis was primarily the result of decreases in non-interest income of $48,000 and net interest income of $24,000, and an increase in non-interest expense of $25,000, offset by a decrease in the provision for income taxes of $35,000.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased $24,000, or 2.6% to $903,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $927,000 for the comparable period in 2010.  The decrease was the result of a $32,000, or 2.3% decrease in interest income which was offset by an $8,000, or 1.6% decrease in interest expense.

Interest Income. Interest income decreased $32,000, or 2.3%, to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in interest income was due primarily to a 48 basis point decrease in the overall yield on interest-earning assets from 5.88% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to 5.40% for the same period in 2011. The decrease in overall yield on interest-earning assets was primarily attributable to an 11 basis point decrease in the average yield on  net loans receivable which combined with a $528,000 decline in the average balance of  net loans receivable had the effect of decreasing interest income by $30,000.  Also contributing to the decrease was a $23,000 decline in interest income related to mortgage-backed securities primarily attributable to a $2.0 million decrease in the average balance between the two periods due to principal payments on these securities.  Offsetting these increases was an $8.7 million increase in the average balance of short-term investments and investment activities which when combined with a 17 basis point decrease in the average yield on short-term investments and investment activities had the effect of increasing interest income $21,000.  Increases in average short-term investments and investment securities was primarily funded by the $9.4 million period over period increase in average interest-bearing deposits.
35

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $8,000, or 1.6%, to $486,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $494,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  The decrease was primarily attributable to a 23 basis point decrease in the overall cost of average interest-bearing liabilities to 2.12% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 from 2.35% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 which resulted in a decrease of $44,000 of interest expense.  The decrease in rates was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from September 2010 to September 2011.  This decrease in interest expense due to rate was offset by a $7.5 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $36,000.  The increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities was primarily driven by the growth in average certificates of deposit of $8.6 million, average eSavings accounts of $996,000, and average statement savings accounts of $93,000, due to customer interest in higher yielding and secure investments.  These increases were offset by the decrease in average FHLB advances of $1.8 million as these advances were paid down and a decline in average passbook accounts of $273,000.

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, and Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin.  All average balances are based on daily balances.
Three Months Ended September 30,
2011
2010
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/
Rate
Interest-earning assets:
(Dollars in thousands)
Short-term investments and investment securities
$ 23,950 $ 75 1.25 $ 15,260 $ 54 1.42 %
Mortgage-backed securities
4,475 54 4.83 6,444 77 4.78
Loans receivable, net (1)
74,449 1,260 6.77 74,977 1,290 6.88
Total interest-earning assets
102,874 1,389 5.40 % 96,681 1,421 5.88 %
Non-interest-earning assets
5,133 4,661
Total assets
$ 108,007 $ 101,342
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Passbook accounts
$ 2,911 2 0.27 % $ 3,184 4 0.50 %
Statement savings accounts
6,859 10 0.58 6,766 15 0.89
eSavings accounts
2,827 7 0.99 1,831 5 1.09
Certificate of deposit accounts
74,325 416 2.24 65,771 403 2.45
Total deposits
86,922 435 2.00 77,552 427 2.20
FHLB advances
4,252 45 4.23 6,057 61 4.03
Other borrowings
409 6 5.87 429 6 5.59
Total interest-bearing liabilities
91,583 486 2.12 % 84,038 494 2.35 %
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
859 879
Total liabilities
92,442 84,917
Stockholders’ Equity
15,565 16,425
Total liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$ 108,007 $ 101,342
Net interest-earning assets
$ 11,291 $ 12,643
Net interest income; average interest rate spread
$ 903 3.28 % $ 927 3.53 %
Net interest margin (2)
3.51 % 3.84 %
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities
112.33 % 115.04 %
_______________________
(1)
Includes non-accrual loans during the respective periods.  Calculated net of deferred fees and discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses.
(2)
Equals net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.



36

Provision for Loan Losses. The Company’s  provision for loan losses was $29,000 for both of the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, based on an evaluation of the allowance relative to such factors as volume of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit risk, prevailing economic conditions, prior loan loss experience and amount of non-performing loans at September 30, 2011.

Non-performing loans amounted to $3.0 million, or 4.00% of net loans receivable at September 30, 2011, consisting of thirty-three loans, nineteen of which are on non-accrual status and fourteen of which are 90 days or more past due and accruing interest. At December 31, 2010, non-performing loans amounted to $1.5 million, or 2.02% of net loans receivable, consisting of thirteen loans, seven of which were on non-accrual status and six of which were 90 days or more past due and accruing interest.  The non-performing loans at September 30, 2011 include thirteen one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loans, nine home equity loans, six one-to-four family owner occupied residential loans, four commercial real estate loans, and one multi-family residential loan, and all are generally well-collateralized or adequately reserved for. Management does not anticipate any significant losses on these loans. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, six loans were placed on non-accrual status resulting in the reversal of $21,000 of previously accrued interest income. Also during the quarter, one loan previously on non-accrual status was transferred to other real estate owned. Included in non-performing loans are nine loans identified as troubled debt restructurings which totaled $940,000 at September 30, 2011.  The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans receivable was 1.00% at September 30, 2011 and 1.15% at December 31, 2010.
Other real estate owned (OREO) amounted to $560,000 at September 30, 2011, consisting of four properties, none of which had a carrying value greater than $375,000. This compares to five properties totaling $1.2 million at December 31, 2010.  Non-performing assets amounted to $3.6 million, or 3.26% of total assets at September 30, 2011 compared to $2.7 million, or 2.64% of total assets at December 31, 2010.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, one one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loan with an outstanding loan balance of $90,000 previously classified as non-accrual, was transferred into OREO at a fair value of approximately $55,000.  In conjunction with this transfer, $35,000 of the outstanding loan balance was charged-off through the allowance for loan losses.  Also during the quarter, the Company sold three OREO properties and realized an aggregate loss of $53,000 on the transactions.  The Company financed the purchase of all three properties.  In addition, the Company anticipates a loan closing on one additional OREO property currently under agreement of sale sometime in the fourth quarter of 2011.  No loss is anticipated on this transaction.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company transferred four properties into OREO totaling $640,000 and sold five properties totaling $1.3 million.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income decreased $48,000, or 53.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 over the comparable period in 2010 due primarily to an aggregate loss of $53,000 realized on the sale of three other real estate owned properties.

Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $25,000, or 3.6%, from $702,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $727,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011.  Salaries and employee benefits expense accounted for $88,000 of the change as this expense increased 25.4%, from $347,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $435,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 due primarily to increased staff as the Company expanded its mortgage banking and lending operations and implemented employee health care benefits.  Also contributing to the period over period increase was an $11,000, or 22.4% increase in occupancy and equipment expense, a $6,000, or 11.8%  increase in directors’ fees and expenses and a $6,000, or 13.0% increase in other expense.  Offsetting these increases was a $56,000, or 147.4% decrease in FDIC deposit insurance expense, a $19,000, or 26.4% decrease in other real estate owned expense, an $8,000, or 9.5% decrease in professional fees, and a $3,000, or 20% decrease in advertising.  The decrease in FDIC deposit insurance expense was attributable to a combination of the change in the method the FDIC uses to calculate the assessment and a modification of the accrual estimate.
37

Provision for Income Tax. The provision for income tax decreased $35,000, or 31.3%,  from $112,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $77,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 due primarily to the decrease in pre-tax income as our effective tax rate remained relatively consistent at 41.0% for the 2011 period compared to 39.3% for the comparable period in 2010.

Earnings per Share. Basic and diluted earnings per share decreased from $0.17 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $0.13 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as a result of a $62,000 decrease in net income, offset by a reduction of 136,204 average basic shares outstanding and 135,775 average diluted shares outstanding during this same period.  The reduction in average shares outstanding was attributable to the purchase of 125,210 shares of the Company’s stock in the open-market as part of the Company’s stock repurchase programs, as well as other private repurchases from September 30, 2010 through September 30, 2011.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

General. Net income amounted to $385,000 from the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $465,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The $80,000, or 17.2% decrease was primarily the result of a $207,000 increase in non-interest expense and $14,000 decrease in non-interest income, offset by a $102,000 increase in net interest income and a $38,000 decrease in the provision for income taxes and a $1,000 decrease in the provision for loan losses.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $102,000 or 3.9%, to $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $2.6 million for the comparable period in 2010.  The increase was driven by a $70,000, or 1.7% increase in interest income and a $32,000, or 2.2% decrease in interest expense.

Interest Income. Interest income increased $70,000, or 1.7%, to $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The increase was primarily attributable to an 11 basis point increase in the average yield on net loans receivable which when combined with a $223,000 increase in the average balance of net loans receivable had the effect of increasing interest income by $73,000.  Also contributing to the increase was an $8.9 million increase in the average balance of short-term investments and investment securities which when combined with a 11 basis point decrease in the average yield on short-term investments and investment securities had the effect of increasing interest income $72,000.  Offsetting these increases was a decrease in interest income related to mortgage-backed securities which declined $75,000 period over period due primarily to a $2.1 million decrease in the average balance between the two periods due to principal payments on these securities.  Increases in average short-term investments and investment securities was primarily funded by the $9.1 million period over period increase in average interest-bearing deposits.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $32,000, or 2.2%, to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The decrease was primarily attributable to a 23 basis point decrease in the overall cost of average interest-bearing liabilities to 2.14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from 2.43% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 which resulted in a decrease of $181,000 of interest expense.  The decrease in rates was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from September 2010 to September 2011.  This decrease in interest expense due to rate was offset by a $9.1 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $149,000.  The increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities was primarily driven by the growth in average certificates of deposit of $9.8 million, average eSavings accounts of $872,000, and average statement savings accounts of $248,000, due to customer interest in higher yielding and secure investments. These increases were offset by the decrease in average FHLB advances of $1.6 million as these advances were paid down and a decline in average passbook accounts of $223,000.
38

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, and Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin.  All average balances are based on daily balances.
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2011
2010
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Yield/
Rate
Interest-earning assets:
(Dollars in thousands)
Short-term investments and investment securities
$ 21,425 $ 199 1.24 % $ 12,548 $ 127 1.35 %
Mortgage-backed securities
4,826 174 4.81 6,943 249 4.78
Loans receivable, net (1)
74,106 3,751 6.75 73,883 3,678 6.64
Total interest-earning assets
100,357 4,124 5.48 % 93,374 4,054 5.79 %
Non-interest-earning assets
5,444 4,612
Total assets
$ 105,801 $ 97,986
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Passbook accounts
$ 3,024 8 0.35 % $ 3,247 15 0.62 %
Statement savings accounts
6,902 37 0.71 6,654 53 1.06
eSavings accounts
2,743 20 0.97 1,871 17 1.21
Certificate of deposit accounts
71,491 1,202 2.24 61,718 1,174 2.54
Total deposits
84,160 1,267 2.01 73,490 1,259 2.28
FHLB advances
4,908 149 4.05 6,462 188 3.88
Other borrowings
414 18 5.80 434 19 5.84
Total interest-bearing liabilities
89,482 1,434 2.14 % 80,386 1,466 2.43 %
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
862 863
Total liabilities
90,344 81,249
Stockholders’ Equity
15,457 16,737
Total liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$ 105,801 $ 97,986
Net interest-earning assets
$ 10,875 $ 12,988
Net interest income; average interest rate spread
$ 2,690 3.34 % $ 2,588 3.36 %
Net interest margin (2)
3.57 % 3.70 %
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities
112.15 % 116.16 %
______________________
(1)
Includes non-accrual loans during the respective periods.  Calculated net of deferred fees and discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses.
(2)
Equals net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

Provision for Loan Losses. The Company decreased its provision for loan losses by $1,000 from $86,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $85,000 for the same period in 2011, based on an evaluation of the allowance relative to such factors as volume of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit risk, prevailing economic conditions, prior loan loss experience and amount of non-performing loans at September 30, 2011.  See additional discussion under “Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011.”

Non-Interest Income. As was the case for the quarter, the $14,000, or 5.9% decrease in non-interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 over the comparable period in 2010 was primarily attributable to an aggregate loss of $53,000 realized on the sale of three other real estate owned properties.  This loss was offset by a combined $39,000 increase in fee income primarily generated by Quaint Oak Bank’s mortgage banking, title abstract and real estate sales subsidiaries.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $207,000, or 10.5%, from $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.  Salaries and employee benefits expense accounted for $252,000 of the change as this expense increased 25.1%, from $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, due primarily to increased staff as the Company expanded its mortgage banking and lending operations and implemented employee health care benefits.  Occupancy
39

and equipment expense accounted for $28,000 of the change as this expense increased 20.1%, from $139,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $167,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This period over period increase was primarily attributable to the costs associated with the installation of a new telephone system and repairs, maintenance and real estate taxes related to our Lehigh Valley office.  Directors’ fees and expenses accounted for $15,000 of the change as this expense increased 9.7%, from $155,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $170,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, due primarily to the increased number of committee meetings.  The other real estate owned expense category increased $6,000, or 6.1%, from $98,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $104,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as costs were incurred on the Bank’s foreclosed properties to maintain the properties and prepare them for resale.  Also contributing to the increase in non-interest expenses was a $6,000, or 4.0% increase in other expense.  Offsetting these increases was a $55,000, or 48.2% decrease in FDIC deposit insurance expense, a $36,000, or 13.6% decrease in professional fees, and a $9,000, or 20.5% decrease in advertising.  As was the case for the quarter, the decrease in FDIC deposit insurance expense was attributable to a combination of the change in the method the FDIC uses to calculate the assessment and a modification of the accrual estimate.
Provision for Income Tax. The provision for income tax decreased $38,000, or 12.5%,  from $303,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $265,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due primarily to the decrease in pre-tax income as our effective tax rate remained relatively consistent at 40.8% for the 2011 period compared to 39.5% for the comparable period in 2010.

Earnings per Share. Basic and diluted earnings per share was $0.44 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 as a  result of a reduction of 187,063 average basic shares outstanding and  186,396 average diluted shares outstanding during this same period which offset the $80,000 period over period decrease in net income.  The reduction in average shares outstanding was attributable to the purchase of 125,210 shares of the Company’s stock in the open-market as part of the Company’s stock repurchase programs, as well as other private repurchases from September 30, 2010 through September 30, 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans and to a lesser extent, loan sales and other funds provided from operations.  While scheduled principal and interest payments on loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.  The Company sets the interest rates on its deposits to maintain a desired level of total deposits.  In addition, the Company invests excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets that provide additional liquidity.  At September 30, 2011, the Company's cash and cash equivalents amounted to $10.5 million.  At such date, the Company also had $3.1 million invested in interest-earning time deposits maturing in one year or less.

The Company uses its liquidity to fund existing and future loan commitments, to fund deposit outflows, to invest in other interest-earning assets and to meet operating expenses.  At September 30, 2011, Quaint Oak Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $1.7 million and commitments under unused lines of credit of $3.3 million.

At September 30, 2011, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled $34.4 million.  Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case.

40

In addition to cash flow from loan payments and prepayments and deposits, the Company has significant borrowing capacity available to fund liquidity needs.  If the Company requires funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, which provide an additional source of funds.  As of September 30, 2011, we had $3.8 million of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and had $44.3 million in borrowing capacity.  We are reviewing our continued utilization of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a source of funding based on the decision in December 2008 by the Federal Home Loan Bank to suspend the dividend on, and restrict the repurchase of, Federal Home Loan Bank stock.  The amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock that a member institution is required to hold is directly proportional to the volume of advances taken by that institution.  Should we decide to utilize sources of funding other than advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, we believe that additional funding is available in the form of advances or repurchase agreements through various other sources.  The Bank currently has a line of credit commitment from another bank for borrowings up to $1.5 million.  There were no borrowings under this line of credit at September 30, 2011.

Our stockholders’ equity amounted to $15.5 million at September 30, 2011, an increase of $342,000 from December 31, 2010. Contributing to the increase was net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 of $385,000, amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans of $89,000, and common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan of $53,000. These increases were offset by dividends paid of $100,000, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $38,000, and the purchase of 5,310 shares of the Company’s stock as part of the Company’s stock repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of $47,000. For further discussion of the stock compensation plans, see Note 7 in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.

Quaint Oak Bank is required to maintain regulatory capital sufficient to meet tier 1 leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 4.00%, 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively.  At September 30, 2011, Quaint Oak Bank exceeded each of its capital requirements with ratios of 13.26%, 21.49% and 22.64%, respectively. As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is not currently subject to any regulatory capital requirements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles are not recorded in our financial statements.  These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk.  Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers' requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit.  Our exposure to credit loss from non-performance by the other party to the above-mentioned financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.  We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.  In general, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off–balance sheet credit risk.

Commitments. At September 30, 2011, we had unfunded commitments under lines of credit of $3.3 million and $1.7 million of commitments to originate loans.  We had no commitments to advance additional amounts pursuant to outstanding lines of credit or undisbursed construction loans .


Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which generally require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in relative purchasing power over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance than does the effect of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation to a larger extent than interest rates.

41


ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Applicable.


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 2011.  Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations are operating in an effective manner.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the third fiscal quarter of fiscal 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

42

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business, which involve amounts in the aggregate believed by management to be immaterial to the financial condition and operating results of the Company.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a)           Not applicable.

(b)           Not applicable.

(c)           Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s repurchases of its common stock made during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 are set forth in the table below:

Period
Total Number of Shares
Purchased
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs (1)
July 1, 2011 – July 31, 2011
- $ - - 68,225
August 1, 2011 – August 31, 2011
- - - 68,225
September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2011
5,000 8.75 5,000 63,225
Total
5,000 $ 8.75 5,000 63.225

Notes to this table:

(1)
On September 10, 2010, the Company announced by press release its third repurchase program to repurchase up to an additional 69,431 shares, or approximately 6.2% of the Company's current outstanding shares of common stock as of September 30, 2010. The Company commenced this third stock repurchase program upon the completion of its prior repurchase program on December 3, 2010.


ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.


ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)



43

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

No.
Description
31.1
Rule 13a-14(d) and 15d-14(d) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.
31.2
Rule 13a-14(d) and 15d-14(d) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.
32.0
Section 1350 Certification.
The following Exhibits are being furnished as part of this report:
No.
Description
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.*
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.*
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.*
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.*
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.*
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document.*
____________________
*
The interactive data files are being furnished on Exhibit 101 hereto and, in accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.














44




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




Date: November 14, 2011 /s/Robert T. Strong
By: Robert T. Strong
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2011 By: /s/John J. Augustine
John J. Augustine
Chief Financial Officer
TABLE OF CONTENTS