RGC RESOURCES INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
x
Check the appropriate box:
¨
Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x
Definitive Proxy Statement
¨
Definitive Additional Materials
¨
Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
RGC RESOURCES, INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
No fee required.
¨
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
_________________________________________________________________________________
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
_________________________________________________________________________________
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
_________________________________________________________________________________
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
_________________________________________________________________________________
(5) Total fee paid:
_________________________________________________________________________________
¨
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
_________________________________________________________________________________
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
_________________________________________________________________________________
(3) Filing Party:
_________________________________________________________________________________
(4) Date Filed:
_________________________________________________________________________________
RGC RESOURCES, INC.
519 Kimball Avenue, N.E.
Roanoke, Virginia 24016
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 4, 2019
December 14, 2018
NOTICE is hereby given that, pursuant to its Bylaws and call of its Directors, the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of RGC Resources, Inc. will be held at The Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center, 110 Shenandoah Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, on Monday, February 4, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., for the purposes of:
1. Electing three Class A directors.
|
2.
|
Ratifying the selection of Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. as the independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
3.
|
Approving, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.
|
|
4.
|
Acting on such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
|
Your attention is directed to the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice for a more complete description regarding matters proposed to be acted upon at the meeting. Only those shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 23, 2018 shall be entitled to vote. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please so indicate in the space provided on the proxy card or respond when prompted on the telephone or through the Internet.
Admission to the meeting will be limited to invited guests and those who respond and bring their admission card and proper ID with them.
PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES BY THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY PROMPTLY MARKING, DATING, SIGNING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
Sincerely,
John B. Williamson, III
Chairman
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials.
This Notice for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the attached Proxy Statement and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at
www.rgcresources.com/corporate-governance/
.
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 4, 2019
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of RGC Resources, Inc. ("we", "our", "Resources" or the "Company") to be held on Monday, February 4, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. at The Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center, 110 Shenandoah Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24016 (the “Annual Meeting”).
Record Date and Voting Securities
Notice of the Company's Annual Meeting was mailed on or about December 14, 2018 to all shareholders of record. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on November 23, 2018, the record date, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. A list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be open to the examination by any shareholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours at the Company’s offices at 519 Kimball Avenue, N.E., Roanoke, Virginia 24016, and at the time and place of the meeting.
As of the record date,
8,003,606 c
ommon shares were issued and outstanding. Each common share is entitled to one vote. A majority of the common shares outstanding entitled to vote on the record date, whether present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.
Proxies in the form enclosed herewith are solicited by management at the direction of the Company’s Board of Directors (the "Board").
Voting Procedures
Shareholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, on-line at www.proxyvote.com, by mailing the proxy card or by telephone by calling (800) 690-6903. Votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by an Inspector of Elections, appointed by the Company. All proxy materials are available on the Company's website at www.rgcresources.com.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please so indicate when you return your proxy card, so that we may send you an admission ticket and make the necessary arrangements. Shareholders who plan to attend the Annual Meeting must present valid, government-issued photo identification along with an admission ticket.
If your shares are held in a
brokerage account or by a bank, broker, trustee, or other nominee, you are considered the "beneficial owner" of shares held in "street name." You should have received a voting instruction form with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from the Company. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other nominee regarding how to vote the shares in your account by following these voting instructions. If you are a beneficial owner and do not instruct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares, the brokers and nominees can use their discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares with respect to Proposal No. 2 regarding the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm, which is considered a "broker non-vote" for other matters.
Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as shares present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining a quorum. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for Proposal Nos. 2 and 3 and will have the same effect as AGAINST votes.
If you return a signed and dated proxy card without marking voting selections or providing different instructions on the proxy card, your shares will be voted at the meeting FOR the election of the three director nominees listed in Proposal No. 1, FOR the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal No. 2 and FOR the advisory approval of executive compensation in Proposal No. 3. With respect to any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and be submitted to a vote of shareholders, proxies will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the designated proxy holders. We do not know of any matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this proxy statement.
The director nominees listed in Proposal No. 1 will be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. The three nominees receiving the most FOR votes will be elected.
1
The appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm listed in Proposal No. 2 will be ratified if a majority of shares present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon vote FOR such proposal.
Proposal No. 3, advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, will be considered to be approved if it receives FOR votes from the holders of a majority of shares either present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote.
Revoking a Proxy
You may revoke your proxy at any time before voting is declared closed at the Annual Meeting by: (i) voting at the Annual Meeting in person; (ii) executing and delivering a subsequent proxy; (iii) submitting another time and later dated proxy by telephone or the internet or (iv) delivering a written statement to the Corporate Secretary revoking the proxy. Attending the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself revoke a proxy.
Remainder of page intentionally left blank
2
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF RESOURCES
The Company’s Board of Directors consists of nine members and is divided into three classes (A, B, and C) with staggered three-year terms. The current term of office of the Class A directors expires at the 2019 Annual Meeting. The terms of Class B and C directors expire in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Each of the Company’s current directors and nominees for election are independent directors, as determined under the Company’s independence standards adopted in accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and NASDAQ, except John S. D’Orazio.
There are three nominees for Class A directors: Abney S. Boxley, III, S. Frank Smith and John B. Williamson, III. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors have selected and endorsed each of these candidates because each brings unique talents and business experience to the Board.
Abney S. Boxley, III
is President - East Region, Summit Materials, an SEC registered manufacturer and distributor of construction materials and aggregate. Mr. Boxley was most recently President and CEO of Boxley Materials Company, a position in which he served from 1998 to October 2018. He also serves on the board of directors of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., an SEC registered public bank holding company, Insteel Industries, Inc., an SEC registered manufacturer of steel wire reinforcing products, and Carilion Clinic, a local health-care organization. Mr. Boxley has been a director of the Company since 1994. He holds an MBA degree from the University of Virginia Darden School.
We believe that Mr. Boxley's deep understanding of mergers and acquisitions, business development and his knowledge of local construction and economic development opportunities in the Company's service area make him a valuable member of our Board.
S. Frank Smith
is retired from Alpha Coal Sales Company, LLC, and previously served as Consultant and Vice President - Industrial Sales with Alpha Coal Sales Company, LLC. Mr. Smith was in the coal marketing and product acquisition business for over 40 years. Mr. Smith has been a director of the Company since 1990 and holds a Masters of Arts degree from Hollins University.
We believe Mr. Smith's in-depth knowledge of the competitive and regulatory landscape of energy markets is helpful to our understanding of the rapidly changing energy industry and its implications on our customer base. This, in addition to his leadership as chair of the Compensation Committee, makes him a valuable member of our Board.
John B. Williamson, III
currently serves as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Williamson formerly served as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and was involved in the executive management of the Company beginning in 1992 and has served on the Board since 1998. Mr. Williamson holds an MBA from the College of William and Mary. Mr. Williamson is a member of the board of directors of Optical Cable Corporation, an SEC registered optical fiber cable manufacturer, Luna Innovations Incorporated, an SEC registered technology company, Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation, an SEC registered natural gas distribution company located in the state of New York, and the Bank of Botetourt, a non-registered publicly traded bank.
We believe that Mr. Williamson's utility industry experience, understanding of the changing natural gas business and in-depth knowledge of the operational, financial and regulatory aspects of the Company provide the management team valuable strategic and operating expertise, and, along with his public company board experience in corporate governance, strategic planning and compliance, make him a valuable member of our Board.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for Class A Director.
3
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF BROWN, EDWARDS & COMPANY, L.L.P. AS THE
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Upon recommendation and selection by the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors approved Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. (“Brown Edwards”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ending September 30, 2018. Brown Edwards has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2006. The Audit Committee has reappointed Brown Edwards as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019 and to audit our internal controls over financial reporting. A representative of Brown Edwards is expected to attend the meeting.
The Company’s Audit Committee is solely responsible for selecting the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019. Although shareholder ratification of the appointment of Brown Edwards is not required by the Company's bylaws, the Board of Directors believes that it is desirable to do so. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Brown Edwards, the Audit Committee will consider whether to engage another independent registered public accounting firm. If the appointment of Brown Edwards is ratified by shareholders, the Audit Committee may change the appointment at any time if it determines a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P.
PROPOSAL 3: NON-BINDING SHAREHOLDER ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
At the 2017 Annual Meeting, our shareholders voted to continue the annual shareholder review of executive compensation. We believe that our executive compensation program is competitive within the industry and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. This program has been designed to promote a performance-based culture and ensure a philosophy of long-term value creation by aligning the interests of the executive officers with those of our shareholders by linking a meaningful portion of their compensation to the Company’s performance. The program is also designed to meet short-term objectives and to attract and retain highly-talented executive officers who are critical to the successful execution of the Company’s strategic business plan.
We also believe that both the Company and shareholders benefit from constructive and consistent dialogue. The proposal set forth above is intended to give you the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation we paid to our named executive officers for fiscal 2018 and the proposed compensation for fiscal 2019.
The Compensation Committee has overseen the development of the executive compensation program, as described more fully in the Compensation, Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
Please note that your vote is advisory and will not be binding upon the Company or the Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee value the opinions that our shareholders express in their votes and in any additional dialogue. Consequently, the Compensation Committee intends to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions for our executive officers.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR approval, on an advisory basis, the named executive officers compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement.
4
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Company’s Board of Directors consists of nine directors and is divided equally into three classes, with staggered three-year terms. The Board has separate persons serving as its Chair and as the President and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of the Company. The Board believes this is the appropriate leadership structure at this time.
The Board met eight times during the 2018 fiscal year. All Board members attended at least 75 percent of Board and committee meetings in fiscal year 2018. Consistent with NASDAQ rules, a majority of the Company’s non-management directors met at least once each quarter without management present. All directors serving on the Board attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of shareholders. The present principal occupation and employment during the past five years, and the office held with the Company, if any, of each director:
|
Name and Age
|
Year In Which First Elected As Director
|
Business Experience
|
Year in Which Assumed Principal Occupation
|
|
CLASS A DIRECTORS
(Currently serving until the 2019 Annual Meeting)
|
|||
|
Abney S. Boxley, III
Age 60
|
1994
|
See disclosure in Proposal No. 1 above.
|
2018
|
|
S. Frank Smith
Age 70
|
1990
|
See disclosure in Proposal No. 1 above.
|
2018
|
|
John B. Williamson, III
Age 64
|
1998
|
See disclosure in Proposal No. 1 above.
|
2014
|
|
CLASS B DIRECTORS
(Serving until the 2020 Annual Meeting)
|
|||
|
Nancy Howell Agee
Age 66
|
2005
|
President, CEO & Director, Carilion Clinic; President & COO Carilion Clinic 2010-2011; COO & Executive Vice President, Carilion Clinic 2007-2010; Director, Healthcare Realty Trust Inc.; Director, Hometown Bank; Director, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine; Chair, American Hospital Association. As the CEO of the largest employer in the Company's service area and her active leadership and participation in the community, Mrs. Agee is a valuable Board member.
|
2011
|
|
J. Allen Layman
Age 66
|
1991
|
Private Investor. A former CEO, Mr. Layman's utility and regulatory experience makes him a valuable Board member.
|
2003
|
|
Raymond D. Smoot, Jr.
Age 71
|
2005
|
Chairman, Union Bankshares Corporation; Senior Fellow, Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. 2012-2017; CEO & Secretary, Virginia Tech Foundation, Inc. 2003-2012; Director, Carilion Clinic. Dr. Smoot's professional experience and public company board experience make him a valuable Board member.
|
2017
|
|
CLASS C DIRECTORS
(Currently serving until 2021 Annual Meeting)
|
|||
|
T. Joe Crawford
Age 63
|
2018
|
Vice President & General Manager, Steel Dynamics Roanoke Bar Division; President & Chief Operating Officer, Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation 2004-2006. Mr. Crawford's professional and community board experience make him a valuable Board member.
|
2006
|
|
John S. D'Orazio
Age 58
|
2014
|
President, CEO & Director, RGC Resources, Inc. & Roanoke Gas Company. President & CEO, Roanoke Gas Company 2012-2014. Mr. D'Orazio provides the Board with in-depth knowledge of the Company's operations, business strategy, risks and economic climate as well as extensive utility industry experience.
|
2014
|
|
Maryellen F. Goodlatte
Age 66
|
2001
|
Attorney & Principal, law firm of Glen Feldmann Darby & Goodlatte. Mrs. Goodlatte's experience as an attorney in the Company's service area, in addition to her leadership as chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, make her a valuable member of the Board.
|
1983
|
5
The Board has standing Compensation, Audit and Governance and Nominating committees. The Board has affirmatively determined that each of the Company’s current directors are considered independent directors in respect to each committee on which he or she serves, as determined under the Company’s independence standards adopted in accordance with the applicable rules of the SEC and NASDAQ. In addition, the Board has determined that Abney S. Boxley III and Raymond D. Smoot, Jr. are audit committee financial experts under applicable SEC rules. The following table summarizes each committee.
|
Committee
|
Members
|
Responsibilities
|
Independence
|
|
Compensation
|
S. Frank Smith, Chair
|
Assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the compensation of the Company's directors and executive officers.
|
Each Member is Independent
|
|
Nancy Howell Agee
|
|||
|
Abney S. Boxley, III
|
|||
|
J. Allen Layman
|
|||
|
Audit
|
Raymond D. Smoot, Jr., Chair
|
Reviews and assesses the Company’s processes to manage financial reporting risk and to manage investment, tax, and other financial risks. It also reviews the Company’s policies for risk assessment and steps management has taken to control significant risks, except those delegated by the Board to other committees.
|
Each Member is Independent
|
|
Abney S. Boxley, III
|
|||
|
S. Frank Smith
|
|||
|
T. Joe Crawford
|
|||
|
Governance
|
Maryellen F. Goodlatte, Chair
|
Responsible for the oversight of a broad range of issues surrounding the composition and operation of the Board, including identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, recommending nominees for Board election, and recommending to the Board governance principles. It also provides assistance to the Board in the areas of committee member selection and rotation practices, evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the Board and consideration of developments in corporate governance practices.
|
Each Member is Independent
|
|
and Nominating
|
Nancy Howell Agee
|
||
|
J. Allen Layman
|
|||
|
John B. Williamson, III
|
|||
The Board's Role in Risk Oversight
The Board and management have distinct roles in the identification, assessment and management of risks that could affect the Company. The Board exercises its responsibility for risk directly and through its three standing committees. In Board or committee meetings, management provides periodic reports to provide guidance on risk assessment and mitigation. Each committee charged with risk oversight reports to the Board on those matters.
Management provides regular updates to both the Audit Committee and the Board regarding cybersecurity and other related information technology matters. These updates include, but are not limited to, reviews of technology infrastructure changes, incident response plans, network and system testing, employee training programs and pertinent insurance programs.
The Board believes that its current leadership structure facilitates its oversight of risk by combining independent leadership, through independent board committees and majority independent board composition, with an experienced Chairman and a CEO who have intimate knowledge of the business, history, and the complex challenges the Company faces. The Chairman and CEO both have in-depth understanding of these matters, and the CEO has direct involvement in the day-to-day management of the Company, uniquely positioning him to promptly identify and raise key business risks to the Board.
Director Nominations
The Governance and Nominating Committee establishes the process by which candidates are selected for possible inclusion in the recommended slate of director nominees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has a charter, which is available on the Company's website at www.rgcresources.com. The Governance and Nominating Committee will take into account the Company’s current needs and the qualities needed for Board service, including experience and achievement in business, finance, technology or other areas relevant to the Company’s activities; reputation, ethical character and maturity of judgment; diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds and experiences; absence of conflicts of interest that might impede the proper performance of director responsibilities; independence under SEC and NASDAQ rules; service on other boards of directors; sufficient time to devote to Board matters; and the ability to work effectively with other Board members. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Governance and Nominating Committee will review such directors’ overall service to the Company during their term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation and quality of performance. For those potential
6
new director candidates who appear upon first consideration to meet the Board’s selection criteria, the Governance and Nominating Committee will conduct appropriate inquiries into their background and qualifications and, depending on the result of such inquiries, arrange for in-person meetings with the potential candidates.
The Governance and Nominating Committee may use multiple sources for identifying director candidates, including its own contacts and referrals from other directors, members of management, the Company’s advisers and executive search firms. The Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders and will evaluate such director candidates in the same manner in which it evaluates candidates recommended by other sources.
Any director candidates to be recommended by shareholders should be described in writing to the Corporate Secretary. This recommendation must be sent no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the expected mailing date of this proxy statement, in order to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders.
Transactions with Related Persons
The Board follows certain policies and procedures for the approval of transactions with related persons that are required to be reported under applicable SEC rules. The policy generally requires Audit Committee approval or ratification of transactions that involve more than $120,000 in which the Company is a participant and in which a Company director, nominee for director, executive officer, greater than 5% shareholder, or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons has a direct or indirect material interest. Various other qualifications and exclusions for reportable related party transactions are set forth in applicable SEC rules, such as a transaction where the tariff gas service is at a rate approved by the Virginia State Corporation Commission or certain banking transactions. In reviewing a reportable related party transaction, the Audit Committee will, after reviewing all material information regarding the transaction, take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.
The Company contracted with Boxley Materials Company in fiscal 2018 for approximately $485,000 of paving services and related construction materials. Mr. Boxley, a director, is currently President - East Region, Summit Materials, of which Boxley Materials is a wholly owned subsidiary. The Company contracted with Boxley Materials in fiscal 2017 for approximately $274,000 of paving services and related construction materials. These goods and services were obtained at arms-length pricing and terms and conditions. Throughout fiscal 2017 and 2018 Mr. Boxley was President and CEO of Boxley Materials. The Audit Committee has approved the transactions between the Company and Boxley Materials.
The Company has no other related party transactions to report for fiscal 2017 or 2018.
Compensation of Directors
Director fees are set by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors after the Committee considers the competitive market for directors and fee levels provided by comparable companies both within the utility industry and in the Company's geographic area. Mr. D’Orazio is not compensated for attendance at Board and committee meetings and does not receive the annual retainer for service as a Board member. The 2019 schedule of fees paid to directors is as follows:
|
Annual Director Retainer
|
$
|
44,000
|
|
|
Additional Annual Retainer - Board Chair
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
Additional Annual Retainer - Audit Committee Chair
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
Additional Annual Retainer - Other Committee Chair
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
Additional Annual Retainer - Audit Committee
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
Additional Annual Retainer - Other Committee
|
2,000
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan for Outside Directors.
Under the Company's Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Plan for Outside Directors (the "Director Restricted Plan"), originally adopted January 27, 1997, as amended on March 28, 2016 and effective October 1, 2016, a minimum of 40% of the annual retainer fee paid to each non-employee director of the Company on a monthly basis is paid in shares of Company common stock restricted under the terms of the Director Restricted Plan ("Director Restricted Stock"). If the director owns more than 10,000 shares of Resources stock, the minimum requirement is waived. The number of shares of Director Restricted Stock paid each month is calculated based on the first business day of the month closing price of Resources’ common shares on NASDAQ. A participant can, subject to approval of the Compensation Committee, elect to receive up to 100% of the retainer fee in Director Restricted Stock. Such election cannot be revoked or amended during the fiscal year.
7
The shares of Director Restricted Stock vest only in the case of a director’s death, disability, retirement (including not standing for reelection to the Board), or in the event of a change in control of Resources. There is no option to take cash in lieu of stock upon vesting of shares under this Plan. The Director Restricted Stock may not be sold, transferred, assigned or pledged by the participant until the shares have vested under the terms of this Plan. The shares of Director Restricted Stock will be forfeited to Resources by a director’s voluntary resignation during his or her term on the Board or removal for cause.
Fiscal Year 2018 Director Fees and Restricted Stock Holdings
|
Name
|
Fees paid in cash
|
Fees paid in Restricted Stock
1
|
Total Fees
|
Shares of Restricted Stock as of 9/30/18
|
||||
|
Nancy Howell Agee
|
$ 6,800
|
$ 39,250
|
$ 46,050
|
21,146
|
||||
|
Abney S. Boxley, III
|
6,800
|
|
43,750
|
|
50,550
|
|
20,608
|
|
|
T. Joe Crawford
|
23,400
|
|
13,333
|
|
36,733
|
|
507
|
|
|
Maryellen F. Goodlatte
|
27,225
|
|
22,125
|
|
49,350
|
|
16,995
|
|
|
J. Allen Layman
|
46,050
|
|
—
|
|
46,050
|
|
37,836
|
|
|
S. Frank Smith
|
31,925
|
|
25,125
|
|
57,050
|
|
23,246
|
|
|
Raymond D. Smoot, Jr.
|
57,100
|
|
—
|
|
57,100
|
|
20,957
|
|
|
John B. Williamson, III
|
38,000
|
|
20,800
|
|
58,800
|
|
3,097
|
|
Note 1: 40% of the annual retainer fees paid to non-employee directors must be paid in the form of
Director Restricted Stock, unless a participant owns at least 10,000 shares of Company stock. This
column also includes any additional portion of fees paid to directors in the form of Director Restricted
Stock pursuant to the election of the director.
The following table lists directors who elected to receive a higher percentage of fees as Director Restricted Stock in fiscal 2018:
|
Name
|
Percent if Greater than 40%
|
|
Nancy Howell Agee
|
100%
|
|
Abney S. Boxley, III
|
100%
|
|
Maryellen F. Goodlatte
|
50%
|
|
S. Frank Smith
|
50%
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Based on the Company's review of the copies of forms related to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding beneficial ownership reporting and representations from certain reporting persons, no other reports are required
and one Form 3, covering Mr. Crawford, was filed late in fiscal 2018.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
Name and Age
|
Period Position Held
|
Position and Experience
|
|
John S. D'Orazio, 58
|
February 2014 to present
|
President & CEO - Resources, Roanoke Gas
|
|
October 2012 to February 2014
|
President & CEO - Roanoke Gas
|
|
|
Paul W. Nester, 44
|
February 2015 to present
|
Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary & CFO
|
|
May 2012 to January 2015
|
Vice President, Treasurer & CFO
|
|
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr., 53
|
October 2012 to present
|
Vice President, Operations - Roanoke Gas
|
|
May 2012 to September 2012
|
Director, Operations - Roanoke Gas
|
|
|
Robert L. Wells, II, 54
|
February 2005 to present
|
Vice President, Information Technology
|
8
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of November 23, 2018, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common shares of the Company by all directors and nominees, named executive officers, any holders of more than 5% of common shares and certain beneficial owners as a group. Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes to the table, the named persons have sole voting and investment power with respect to all outstanding common shares shown as beneficially owned by them. The business address of each of the Company's directors and executive officers is the Company's address.
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Common Shares
Beneficially Owned as of 11/23/18
1
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Nancy Howell Agee
2
|
31,669
|
<1%
|
|
Abney S. Boxley, III
5
|
37,212
|
<1%
|
|
T. Joe Crawford
|
5,132
|
<1%
|
|
John S. D’Orazio
3
|
74,116
|
<1%
|
|
Maryellen F. Goodlatte
|
26,088
|
<1%
|
|
J. Allen Layman
|
63,640
|
<1%
|
|
Paul W. Nester
3
|
42,214
|
<1%
|
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
3
|
23,568
|
<1%
|
|
S. Frank Smith
|
87,926
|
1.1%
|
|
Raymond D. Smoot, Jr.
4
|
37,304
|
<1%
|
|
Robert L. Wells, II
3
|
26,799
|
<1%
|
|
John B. Williamson, III
|
131,871
|
1.6%
|
|
All current directors and executive officers
aaa
(as a Group - 12 Persons)
|
587,539
|
7.3%
|
Note 1: Includes Director Restricted Plan shares issued to outside directors and Officer Restricted Stock shares issued to the
named officers still subject to vesting.
Note 2: Includes 26,605 shares owned in trust and 5,064 shares owned in spousal trust.
Note 3: Includes stock options shown in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End section on page 14. All are
exercisable and included as shares beneficially owned.
Note 4: Includes 375 shares owned by spouse.
Note 5: Includes 1,125 shares owned by children in minor trust.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
We are committed to creating shareholder value. In 2018, we achieved our fourth consecutive year of record earnings. Net Income was $7.3 million, or $0.95 per share, compared to $6.2 million, or $0.86 per share, in 2017. Also in 2018, the Board approved a 6.9% annual cash dividend increase to $0.62 per share. The Board has increased the cash dividend every year since 2004.
Our compensation philosophy is designed to incentivize management to create shareholder value, by attracting and retaining talent, rewarding performance and instilling an ownership culture. Our Restricted Stock Plan is intended to advance those goals, by further aligning senior management with our shareholders. As described below, we pay a portion of bonuses in the form of restricted stock, based on earnings targets. This section will provide an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and why we believe it is appropriate for the Company and its shareholders.
We also discuss the Compensation Committee’s methodology for determining appropriate and competitive levels of compensation for the named executive officers. Details of compensation paid to the named executive officers can be found in the tables that follow.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Who are the named executive officers for fiscal year 2018?
The named executive officers who currently serve as executive officers of the Company are John S. D’Orazio, Paul W. Nester, Carl J. Shockley, Jr., and Robert L. Wells, II.
9
What person or group is responsible for determining the compensation levels of named executive officers?
The Compensation Committee has a charter, pursuant to which it reviews and recommends to the Board the compensation, including base salary and annual incentive compensation, of the Company’s CEO and the other named executive officers.
The CEO is actively involved in the executive compensation process. The CEO reviews the performance of each of the named executive officers, other than his own, and, within the defined program parameters, recommends to the Compensation Committee base salary increases and incentive awards for such individuals. He provides the Compensation Committee with financial performance goals for the Company that are used to link pay with performance. The CEO also provides his review to the Compensation Committee with respect to the executive compensation program’s ability to attract, retain and motivate the level of executive talent necessary to achieve the Company’s business goals. The CEO attends the meetings of the Compensation Committee but does not participate in the Committee executive sessions.
The Compensation Committee did not utilize an outside consultant in fiscal year 2018.
What are the Company’s executive compensation principles and objectives?
The Company’s overall executive compensation philosophy is that pay should be competitive with the relevant market for executive talent, be performance based, vary with the attainment of specific objectives and be aligned with the interests of the Company’s shareholders. The core principles of the Company’s executive compensation program include the following:
Pay competitively.
The Compensation Committee believes in positioning executive compensation at levels necessary to attract and retain exceptional leadership talent. An individual’s performance and importance to the Company can result in total compensation being higher or lower than the target market position.
Pay-for-performance.
The Compensation Committee structures executive compensation programs to balance annual and long-term corporate objectives, including specific measures which focus on operational and financial performance through incentive bonuses and the goal of fostering shareholder value creation through restricted stock grants.
Create an ownership culture.
The Compensation Committee believes that using compensation to instill an ownership culture effectively aligns the interests of executive officers and the shareholders. A significant portion of our incentive compensation awarded to executive officers is in the form of restricted common stock. The restrictions are intended to promote stock ownership. In addition, the Committee oversees a modest stock option plan intended to encourage stock ownership.
The CEO and the Compensation Committee periodically review the executive compensation philosophy. No recent changes have been made to the compensation philosophy; however, programmatic changes have been implemented at various times to enhance the effectiveness of the various compensation elements.
How do we determine executive pay?
The Compensation Committee benchmarks base salary, annual incentive bonus, other forms of incentive compensation and the Company's financial performance to a comparison group consisting of publicly traded gas utilities and local companies. The Compensation Committee believes this is the best way to determine whether such compensation is competitive. The comparison group is selected based on six criteria:
|
1.
|
Companies that an outsider, with no knowledge of the Company’s internal deliberations on the topic, would agree offer reasonable comparisons for pay and performance purposes;
|
|
2.
|
Companies that may overlap in the labor market for talent;
|
|
3.
|
Companies with revenue and market capitalizations reasonable for comparison;
|
|
4.
|
Companies whose business models, characteristics, growth potential, and human capital are similar but not necessarily identical to those of the Company;
|
|
5.
|
Public companies based in the United States where compensation and financial data are available in proxy statements and Form 10-K filings; and
|
|
6.
|
Companies large enough to have similar executive positions to ensure statistical significance.
|
10
Based on these criteria, the comparison group consists of:
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Hometown Bankshares, Inc.
Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation Luna Innovations Incorporated
NW Natural, Inc. Unitil Corporation
South Jersey Industries Spire, Inc.
In addition to the comparison group, the Compensation Committee utilizes market compensation data from Salary.com and CompAnalyst, a benefits and compensation consulting firm, for each of its executive positions. This data provides benchmark information for both base pay and total compensation for energy and utility companies in the $50 million to $3.6 billion size range. While the Compensation Committee has not established a specific target for each executive officer position, the Committee uses the comparison group and salary benchmark data to help ensure compensation is reasonably competitive in the industry and local job market.
How do we consider the results of the most recent shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation?
Annually, we ask our shareholders for a non-binding advisory vote on our overall executive compensation. The Board reviews and considers the voting results. In 2018, 96% of votes cast were in favor of the proposal. Since a substantial majority of our shareholders voted in favor of our executive compensation philosophy and program, the Board determined that changing our overall approach to executive compensation was not necessary at this time.
Compensation Elements
Base Salary.
Base salary is fixed compensation and is necessary to attract and retain talent. Base salaries are the only non-variable element of the Company’s total compensation program. Base salaries are set to reflect each named executive officer’s responsibilities, the impact of each named executive officer’s position and the contribution each named executive officer delivers to the Company. Salaries are determined after analyzing competitive levels in the market, using the Company’s comparison group and the Salary.com and CompAnalyst compensation data for executives with comparable responsibilities and job scope. The Compensation Committee also considers internal equities among employees within the Company. Salary increases, if any, are based on individual performance, Company performance and market conditions. To gauge market conditions, the Compensation Committee evaluated the comparison group and market data and established recommended salary levels based on the named executive’s experience, tenure, performance and potential. Based in part on the executive compensation benchmarking and the target levels for base salary set forth above, the Board, acting on the recommendation of Compensation Committee, set the named executive officers’ base salaries for 2018.
Performance Incentive Plan Compensation.
The Performance Incentive Plan provides for a bonus based on the achievement of (1) certain qualitative goals for each named executive officer, which may be individual in nature or for the Company as a whole, and (2) targets for fiscal year earnings per share. For fiscal 2017 performance, the plan did not set a percentage amount by which the achievement of qualitative goals, on the one hand, and earnings targets, on the other hand, contribute towards the bonus amount. The Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, made a determination on such relative contributions. For the fiscal 2017 bonus, the percentage contribution towards the cash bonus amount of the achievement of qualitative goals ranged approximately from 42% to 43% among the named executive officers, versus approximately 58% to 57% in respect of the achievement of the earnings targets. For fiscal 2018 and 2019 performance, the plan bases 50% of the cash bonus on qualitative goals and 50% on earnings targets. The Compensation Committee evaluates achievement by each named executive officer of his or her qualitative goals and then recommends to the Board an amount of bonus to be awarded in respect of such achievement. The plan sets forth minimum, target and maximum earnings per share that may be achieved. The Company is paying a portion of the 2018 bonuses, based on the earnings target, in the form of restricted stock under the Restricted Stock Plan described below, and also plans the same for fiscal 2019.
RGC Resources, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan.
The Company has a Restricted Stock Plan which is intended to provide equity incentives to our key employees. Each restricted stock award will be evidenced by an agreement with the recipient. The agreement shall set forth the "Vesting Period" and "Restriction Period" for the award and any other conditions or restrictions that the Compensation Committee deems advisable, including requirements established pursuant to the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the Internal Revenue Code and any securities trading system or stock exchange upon which such restricted shares are listed.
The "Vesting Period" for an award represents substantial risk of forfeiture until certain dates, at which time such shares or a portion of such shares shall begin to "vest" over time and no longer be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The default Vesting Period for an award shall be three years with one-third of the shares vesting on the first, second and third anniversaries of
11
the effective date of the award, respectively, unless the Compensation Committee establishes otherwise. If a recipient resigns or is otherwise terminated from employment with the Company prior to the end of the Vesting Period, he or she will forfeit all interest to his or her unvested shares of restricted stock granted in an award. Unless otherwise established in an award agreement by the Compensation Committee, in the event of a recipient's death, disability or normal retirement (as considered under our defined benefit pension plan), all of the awarded shares shall vest and no longer be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Likewise, all awarded shares shall vest in the event of a change in control, as defined in the recipient's agreement with the Company that relates to recipient's compensation and benefits upon the occurrence of a change in ownership of the Company or similar event (i.e., our Change-in-Control Agreement).
The "Restricted Period" for an award represents a period during which the recipient may not transfer, sell, pledge, assign, or otherwise alienate or hypothecate shares of restricted stock, and all cash dividends on such shares must be re-invested in our common stock. Unless the Compensation Committee otherwise determines, the Restricted Period shall apply so long as shares of restricted stock are unvested and thereafter apply to 75% of such vested shares unless the recipient satisfies the following minimum ownership levels of our common stock:
President, CEO 300% of annual base salary
CFO, COO 200% of annual base salary
Vice President 150% of annual base salary
The Compensation Committee will use its discretion to determine when and how such minimum levels are measured. Once a recipient satisfies the minimum level of ownership or once a recipient is no longer employed by the Company, the Restricted Period will no longer be applicable to vested shares. A change in control will not affect the Restricted Period.
Key Employee Stock Option Plan of RGC Resources, Inc.
The Company has a Key Employee Stock Option Plan, which is intended to provide the Company’s executive officers and other key employees with long-term incentives and future rewards tied to the price of Resources’ common shares over time.
This Plan requires each option’s exercise price per share to equal the fair value of the Company’s common shares as of the date of the grant. Under the terms of this Plan, the options become exercisable six months from the grant date and expire ten years subsequent to the grant date. There were 25,500 shares granted in December 2016 to the named officers based on each officer's level of responsibility and the Compensation Committee's ongoing decision to link a portion of officer compensation directly to long-term corporate performance. The Compensation Committee did not use specific performance metrics in making these grants. The Key Employee Stock Option Plan continues in force in respect of previously granted options with 36,000 options available for issue. We do not anticipate stock options being a significant part of our future compensation structure.
RGC Resources, Inc. Stock Bonus Plan.
The Company has not made awards under the Stock Bonus Plan in recent years to the named executive officers. The Stock Bonus Plan was effectively replaced by the RGC Resources, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan in fiscal 2018.
Discussion and Analysis of Summary Compensation
The changes in salary for our named executive officers primarily reflect their increasing responsibilities and significant contributions to the success of the Company in fiscal 2018. The Committee also considered competitive market forces and the comparison group in setting the 2019 salary levels. The decrease in pension values are directly attributable to the impact of higher discount rates on the actuarially calculated benefit.
12
Summary Compensation Table
|
Name
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
1
|
Stock Awards
2,3
|
Option
Awards
4
|
Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation
|
Change in Pension Value
5
|
All Other Compensation
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
John S. D'Orazio
|
2018
|
$ 418,070
|
$
|
—
|
|
$ 151,406
|
$
|
—
|
|
$ 161,208
|
$ 29,429
|
$ 40,901
|
$ 801,014
|
||||||
|
President & CEO
|
2017
|
391,084
|
|
135,000
|
|
156,000
|
|
28,210
|
|
—
|
|
51,389
|
|
53,257
|
|
814,940
|
|
||
|
2016
|
363,300
|
|
159,400
|
|
—
|
|
22,220
|
|
—
|
|
263,681
|
|
34,323
|
|
842,924
|
|
|||
|
Paul W. Nester
|
2018
|
253,417
|
|
—
|
|
62,938
|
|
—
|
|
86,953
|
|
24,792
|
|
54,337
|
|
482,437
|
|
||
|
VP, Treasurer,
|
2017
|
221,511
|
|
64,688
|
|
58,500
|
|
21,700
|
|
—
|
|
28,799
|
|
48,563
|
|
443,761
|
|
||
|
Secretary & CFO
|
2016
|
207,353
|
|
66,000
|
|
—
|
|
20,200
|
|
—
|
|
41,494
|
|
33,410
|
|
368,457
|
|
||
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
2018
|
188,931
|
|
—
|
|
32,597
|
|
—
|
|
50,039
|
|
60,903
|
|
47,023
|
|
379,493
|
|
||
|
VP, Information
|
2017
|
182,240
|
|
40,940
|
|
34,710
|
|
10,850
|
|
—
|
|
64,063
|
|
39,990
|
|
372,793
|
|
||
|
Technology
|
2016
|
171,010
|
|
49,000
|
|
—
|
|
10,100
|
|
—
|
|
189,255
|
|
37,698
|
|
457,063
|
|
||
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
2018
|
201,520
|
|
—
|
|
34,200
|
|
—
|
|
52,020
|
|
84,301
|
|
47,689
|
|
419,730
|
|
||
|
VP - Operations,
|
2017
|
189,267
|
|
42,036
|
|
36,270
|
|
13,020
|
|
—
|
|
127,783
|
|
104,693
|
|
513,069
|
|
||
|
Roanoke Gas Co.
|
2016
|
172,566
|
|
48,000
|
|
—
|
|
12,120
|
|
—
|
|
181,826
|
|
32,312
|
|
446,824
|
|
||
Note 1: Bonus amounts were earned in the respective year and paid in the following year.
Note 2: In October 2018, in respect of fiscal 2018 performance, the Company approved a total of 10,227 shares of restricted stock
to be issued to our named executive officers effective January 2, 2019. Mr. D'Orazio received 5,508 shares which is equal
to $151,406 based on the closing price of $27.49 as reported on NASDAQ on October 24, 2018. Mr. Nester received
2,289 shares, which is equal to $62,938 based on such closing price. Mr. Wells received 1,186 shares, which is equal to
$32,597 based on such closing price. Mr. Shockley received 1,244 shares, which is equal to $34,200 based on such
closing price.
Note 3: In October 2017, in respect of fiscal 2017 performance, the Company approved a total of 10,101 shares of restricted stock
to be issued to our named executive officers effective January 2, 2018. Mr. D'Orazio received 5,520 shares which is equal
to $156,000 based on the closing price of $28.26 as reported on NASDAQ on October 30, 2017. Mr. Nester received
2,070 shares, which is equal to $58,500 based on such closing price. Mr. Wells received 1,228 shares, which is equal to
$34,710 based on such closing price. Mr. Shockley received 1,283 shares, which is equal to $36,270 based on such
closing price.
Note 4: The 2017 Option Awards values are based on 9,750 shares for Mr. D'Orazio, 7,500 shares for Mr. Nester, 4,500 shares for Mr. Shockley and 3,750 shares for Mr. Wells. The 2016 Option Awards values are based on 8,250 shares for Mr. D’Orazio, 7,500 shares for Mr. Nester, 4,500 shares for Mr. Shockley and 3,750 shares for Mr. Wells.
Note 5: The Change in Pension Value is an actuarial calculation and was not realized as compensation.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2018
|
Estimated Possible Payouts under Performance Incentive Plan
|
|||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Type
|
Metric
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
Awarded
1
|
% of Target
|
|||||
|
John S. D’Orazio
|
10/29/2018
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
$
|
—
|
|
$ 148,750
|
$ 185,938
|
$ 161,208
|
108.4
|
|||
|
10/29/2018
|
Equity
2
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
127,500
|
|
191,250
|
|
151,406
|
|
118.7
|
||
|
Paul W. Nester
|
10/29/2018
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
—
|
|
79,500
|
|
99,375
|
|
86,953
|
|
109.4
|
|
|
10/29/2018
|
Equity
2
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
53,000
|
|
79,500
|
|
62,938
|
|
118.8
|
||
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
10/29/2018
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
—
|
|
45,750
|
|
57,188
|
|
50,039
|
|
109.4
|
|
|
10/29/2018
|
Equity
2
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
27,450
|
|
41,175
|
|
32,597
|
|
118.8
|
||
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
10/29/2018
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
—
|
|
48,000
|
|
60,000
|
|
52,020
|
|
108.4
|
|
|
10/29/2018
|
Equity
2
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
28,800
|
|
43,200
|
|
34,200
|
|
118.8
|
||
Note 1: The Board approved the above incentive compensation for fiscal year 2018 performance to be paid in 2019.
Note 2: These represent awards of restricted stock under the Company's Restricted Stock Plan as described above
Option Exercises
|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
|
Value Realized Upon Exercise
|
||
|
John S. D‘Orazio
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Paul W. Nester
|
1,200
|
11,612
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
375
|
3,644
|
|
|
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
13
Other Compensation Table
|
Name
|
Year
|
401(K) matching contribution
|
Insurance Premiums
|
Medical Benefits
|
Post Retirement Medical & Life Insurance Benefits
|
Auto
|
Stock Option Exercise
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
John S. D'Orazio
|
2018
|
$ 13,750
|
$ 1,281
|
$ 20,444
|
$
|
—
|
|
$ 5,426
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
40,901
|
|
||||
|
2017
|
13,500
|
|
1,296
|
|
18,861
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
19,600
|
|
53,257
|
|
||||
|
2016
|
13,250
|
|
1,342
|
|
17,019
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,712
|
|
34,323
|
|
||||
|
Paul W. Nester
|
2018
|
12,973
|
|
1,757
|
|
20,750
|
|
—
|
|
7,245
|
|
11,612
|
|
54,337
|
|
|||
|
2017
|
13,606
|
|
1,644
|
|
19,420
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
13,893
|
|
48,563
|
|
||||
|
2016
|
12,428
|
|
1,494
|
|
17,282
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,206
|
|
33,410
|
|
||||
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
2018
|
12,654
|
|
1,198
|
|
20,750
|
|
—
|
|
8,777
|
|
3,644
|
|
47,023
|
|
|||
|
2017
|
11,636
|
|
1,198
|
|
19,330
|
|
6,338
|
|
—
|
|
1,488
|
|
39,990
|
|
||||
|
2016
|
10,226
|
|
1,185
|
|
16,952
|
|
5,835
|
|
—
|
|
3,500
|
|
37,698
|
|
||||
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
2018
|
13,053
|
|
1,228
|
|
20,750
|
|
6,411
|
|
6,247
|
|
—
|
|
47,689
|
|
|||
|
2017
|
12,711
|
|
1,227
|
|
19,420
|
|
6,386
|
|
—
|
|
64,949
|
|
104,693
|
|
||||
|
2016
|
8,628
|
|
1,185
|
|
17,282
|
|
5,217
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
32,312
|
|
||||
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table shows all outstanding unexercised stock options held by our named executive officers as of September 30, 2018. All stock options are vested and exercisable and have an intrinsic value of $1,237,286.
|
Name
|
Number of Unexercised Options
|
Option Exercise Price
|
Option Expiration Date
|
|
|
John S. D‘Orazio
|
9,750
|
$ 16.37
|
Dec 8, 2026
|
|
|
8,250
|
14.15
|
|
Dec 3, 2025
|
|
|
7,500
|
14.40
|
|
Dec 4, 2024
|
|
|
7,500
|
12.63
|
|
Dec 6, 2023
|
|
|
3,600
|
12.67
|
|
Apr 1, 2023
|
|
|
Paul W. Nester
|
7,500
|
16.37
|
|
Dec 8, 2026
|
|
7,500
|
14.15
|
|
Dec 3, 2025
|
|
|
6,000
|
14.40
|
|
Dec 4, 2024
|
|
|
6,000
|
12.63
|
|
Dec 6, 2023
|
|
|
2,650
|
12.67
|
|
Apr 1, 2023
|
|
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
3,750
|
16.37
|
|
Dec 8, 2026
|
|
3,750
|
14.15
|
|
Dec 3, 2025
|
|
|
3,750
|
14.40
|
|
Dec 4, 2024
|
|
|
4,500
|
12.67
|
|
Apr 1, 2023
|
|
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
4,500
|
16.37
|
|
Dec 8, 2026
|
|
4,500
|
14.15
|
|
Dec 3, 2025
|
|
|
4,500
|
14.40
|
|
Dec 4, 2024
|
|
|
4,500
|
12.63
|
|
Dec 6, 2023
|
|
The following table sets forth the shares of restricted stock that have been awarded, but not vested, as of September 30, 2018:
|
Name
|
Grant Date
|
Number of Restricted Shares Not Vested
|
Market Value of Shares Not Vested
|
||
|
John S. D‘Orazio
|
Oct 30, 2017
|
3,746
|
$
|
100,043
|
|
|
Paul W. Nester
|
Oct 30, 2017
|
1,405
|
37,516
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
Oct 30, 2017
|
871
|
23,253
|
|
|
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
Oct 30, 2017
|
833
|
22,256
|
|
|
14
Pension Benefits
The following table shows the accumulated benefits related to the RGC Resources, Inc. Employee Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan") for the named executive officers as of September 30, 2018:
|
Name
|
Years of Credited Service
1
|
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
2
|
Payment During Last Fiscal Year
|
||
|
John S. D’Orazio
|
26
|
$ 1,099,716
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Paul W. Nester
|
7
|
141,829
|
—
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
30
|
863,550
|
—
|
|
|
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
30
|
780,308
|
—
|
|
|
Note 1: The Years of Credited Service represent the years that each named executive officer has
been a participant in the Plan as of September 30, 2018, up to a maximum of 30 years.
Note 2: The Present Value of the Accumulated Benefit presented in the table above is based on a
4.11% discount rate, 4% annual compensation increase and retirement at 65 years of age.
The cost of benefits under the Pension Plan, which are borne by Resources, are computed actuarially and defrayed by earnings from the Pension Plan's investments and/or Resources’ annual contributions. The Pension Plan generally provides for the monthly payment, at normal retirement age 65, of the greater of (a) the participant's accrued benefit as of December 31, 1988 under the formula then in effect or (b) the sum of one‑twelfth of (1) plus (2) minus (3) as follows:
|
(1)
|
1.2% of the participant's average compensation for the highest consecutive sixty months of service multiplied by years of credited service up to thirty years,
|
|
(2)
|
0.65% of the participant's average compensation for the highest consecutive sixty months of service in excess of covered compensation (generally defined as the average of Social Security wage bases over a participant's assumed working lifetime) multiplied by years of credited service up to thirty years, and
|
|
(3)
|
the participant's balance, if any, from the Company's former profit sharing plan.
|
Early retirement with reduced monthly benefits is available at age 55 after ten years of service. Provisions also are made for vesting of benefits after five years of service and for disability and death benefits. All employees hired prior to January 1, 2017 and who are credited with at least 1,000 hours of service in a Pension Plan year are eligible to participate in the Pension Plan. At age 65, for Pension Plan purposes, Mr. D’Orazio, Mr. Shockley, and Mr. Wells will have the maximum 30 credited years of service while Mr. Nester will have 28.
The compensation covered by the Pension Plan includes the total of all amounts paid to a participant by the Company for personal services reported on the participant's federal income tax withholding statement (Form W-2), up to certain statutory limits
.
For plan years beginning January 1, 2018 and 2019 these earnings are limited to $275,000 and $280,000, respectively.
2019 Compensation and Performance Incentive Plan
The Compensation Committee is committed to pay-for-performance, paying competitively and creating an ownership culture. It has recommended salary increases that are consistent with the Company's performance in fiscal 2018 and that reasonably compare with our peers. It has also set the 2019 Performance Incentive Plan metrics to reward the achievement of the Company's objectives and personal performance and thereby drive shareholder return.
The Board approved the Compensation Committee's recommended annual base salaries beginning January 1, 2019, as shown below:
|
Name
|
2019 Salary
|
Change
|
2018 Salary
|
Change
|
2017 Salary
|
|||
|
John S. D‘Orazio
|
$ 450,000
|
5.9%
|
$ 425,000
|
6.3%
|
$ 400,000
|
|||
|
Paul W. Nester
|
315,000
|
|
18.9%
|
265,000
|
|
17.8%
|
225,000
|
|
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
192,000
|
|
4.9%
|
183,000
|
|
2.8%
|
178,000
|
|
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
211,000
|
|
9.9%
|
192,000
|
|
3.2%
|
186,000
|
|
The Board approved the Compensation Committee's Performance Incentive Plan for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019. The cash incentive compensation for each officer is based 50% on the individual's performance with respect to corporate
15
objectives and 50% on a range of earnings results for fiscal 2019. The equity incentive compensation for each officer is based on a range of earnings results for fiscal 2019. The potential range of incentive compensation for each officer is provided below:
|
Name
|
Type
|
Metric
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
||||
|
John S. D’Orazio
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
$
|
—
|
|
$ 157,500
|
$ 196,875
|
||
|
Equity
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
135,000
|
|
202,500
|
|
||
|
Paul W. Nester
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
—
|
|
94,500
|
|
118,125
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
78,750
|
|
118,125
|
|
||
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
—
|
|
48,000
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
28,800
|
|
43,200
|
|
||
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
Cash
|
Performance Achievements
|
—
|
|
63,300
|
|
79,125
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
Earnings
|
—
|
|
42,200
|
|
63,300
|
|
||
Severance or Change-in-Control Agreements
The Company has a change-in-control agreement, dated May 1, 2018 and containing a two-year term, with John S. D'Orazio. The agreement entitles him to certain benefits in the event his employment is terminated without cause and within a specific period of time following a change in control of the Company. For purposes of this agreement, a change in control occurs when (i) any person or entity becomes the beneficial owner of at least 50% of the combined voting power of the Company’s voting securities; (ii) any person or entity becomes the beneficial owner of at least 50% of the voting securities of the surviving entity following a merger, recapitalization, reorganization, consolidation or sale of assets by the Company; or (iii) the Company is liquidated or sells substantially all of its assets. If a change in control occurs, the vesting periods of any equity awards or incentives held by Mr. D'Orazio shall be accelerated without limitation. In the event that his employment with the Company is terminated within 90 days prior to or within two years of the date of a change in control, unless the termination is (a) because of his death or disability, (b) for cause (as defined in the agreement) or (c) by him other than for good reason (as defined in the agreement), then he will receive a lump sum severance payment (the “Severance Payment”) equal to 2.0 times his annualized includable compensation for the base period, within the meaning of Section 280G(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Severance Payment will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid certain federal excise taxes. Also in such event, the Company will continue his life insurance, medical, health and accident and disability plans, programs or arrangements until the earlier of two years after the date of the change in control, his death, or his full-time employment. The agreement does not require him to seek employment to mitigate any payments or benefits provided thereunder. Effective May 1, 2018, the Company also entered into identical Change in Control Agreements with Paul W. Nester, Robert L. Wells, II, and Carl J. Shockley Jr.
The Compensation Committee reviews all of the components of each executive’s compensation and awards a level of each component based on what they believe is reasonable when all elements of the compensation are considered. The Company currently does not structure compensation so as to be fully deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, but the Committee does not anticipate the Company paying compensation at a level where any amounts would not be fully deductible under such Section 162(m).
Estimated Benefits upon a Change in Control
|
Name
|
Cash
|
Equity
1
|
Benefit Plans
2
|
Pension/Tax Other
|
Total
|
||||||||
|
John S. D’Orazio
|
$ 813,340
|
$
|
100,043
|
|
$ 60,949
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
974,332
|
|
||
|
Paul W. Nester
|
486,684
|
|
37,516
|
|
45,889
|
|
—
|
|
570,089
|
|
|||
|
Robert L. Wells, II
|
389,177
|
|
22,256
|
|
44,997
|
|
—
|
|
456,430
|
|
|||
|
Carl J. Shockley, Jr.
|
379,636
|
|
23,253
|
|
45,055
|
|
—
|
|
447,944
|
|
|||
Note 1: Represents the value of unvested Restricted Stock at the September 30, 2018 NASDAQ
closing price of $26.71.
Note 2: Includes amounts for life insurance, medical, health and accident and disability plans.
16
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Report of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the section entitled "Compensation, Discussion and Analysis" in this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that said section be included in this Proxy Statement.
The Compensation Committee met one time during fiscal year 2018 and the meeting was attended by all members. Consistent with the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives related to the CEO and evaluates and determines the CEO compensation level, which is presented to the Board for approval. The Committee also reviews and approves base salary and incentive opportunities for the other named officers, which is also presented to the Board for approval. Director compensation is reviewed annually and recommendations are made to the Board. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves stock ownership guidelines and reviews and recommends equity incentive grants to officers.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee:
S. Frank Smith (Chair), Nancy Howell Agee, Abney S. Boxley, III and J. Allen Layman
Report of the Governance and Nominating Committee
The Governance Committee met three times during the fiscal year and each meeting was attended by all sitting members.
The Governance Committee made the recommendation that Abney S. Boxley, III, S. Frank Smith and John B. Williamson, III, be nominated for re-election to the Board of Directors and to serve a three-year term beginning with the 2019 Annual Meeting and continuing until 2022. The Board approved this recommendation.
The Governance and Nominating Committee annually evaluates and makes recommendations regarding Board committee structures, membership, leadership and accountability, and reviews and recommends committee charters to the Board for approval. The Committee is responsible for the review and evaluation of Director independence. The Governance and Nominating Committee updates the Board on governance issues and makes recommendations as needed and monitors the Board's performance in light of all applicable laws, rules and regulations.
Submitted by the Governance and Nominating Committee:
Maryellen F. Goodlatte (Chair), Nancy Howell Agee, J. Allen Layman, and John B. Williamson, III
17
Report of the Audit Committee
Consistent with the terms of its charter, the Audit Committee met four times in fiscal 2018 with the Company's management and Brown Edwards to review significant financial and accounting matters, internal controls and Brown Edwards' audit results.
Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the accounting and financial reporting functions. Brown Edwards is responsible for performing an audit and expressing an opinion in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") on both the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. In this context, the Audit Committee met with management and Brown Edwards to review and discuss the September 30, 2018 consolidated financial statements including a discussion of the acceptability and quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of critical accounting policies, the clarity of the disclosures in the financial statements and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under standards established by the SEC and the PCAOB.
The Audit Committee discussed with Brown Edwards their firm’s independence from the Company and its management and received written representation from Brown Edwards, in accordance with PCAOB requirements, regarding Brown Edwards' independence. The Audit Committee has also reviewed the non-audit services provided by Brown Edwards and determined that such services did not impact independence.
The Audit Committee considers annually and pre-approves 100% of audit services expenditures, including audit review and attest services, and pre-approves the nature, extent, and cost of all non-audit services provided by Brown Edwards. The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by Brown Edwards for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:
|
2018
|
2017
|
||||||
|
Audit Fees
|
$
|
149,745
|
|
$
|
147,118
|
|
|
|
Audit Related Fees
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Tax Fees
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
All Other Fees
|
122,541
|
|
106,419
|
|
|||
|
Total Fees
|
$
|
272,286
|
|
$
|
253,537
|
|
|
Audit Fees include services performed by Brown Edwards related to the audit of the financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and quarterly reviews for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
All Other Fees
includes services rendered in conjunction with the testing of internal controls, audits of the Company’s employee benefit plans, audit work necessary for the Company's March 2018 equity offering and other general purposes. All services provided by Brown Edwards in 2018 and 2017 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Based on the Audit Committee’s review of Brown Edwards' report to the Audit Committee and discussions with management and Brown Edwards, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, for filing with the SEC.
Submitted by the Audit Committee:
Raymond D. Smoot, Jr. (Chair), Abney S. Boxley, III, T. Joe Crawford, and S. Frank Smith
18
SHAREHOLDERS PROPOSALS AND COMMUNICATIONS
For a shareholder proposal or the nomination of a person for election as a director to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the proposal must be submitted in writing and received by Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 13007, Roanoke, VA 24030 no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the expected mailing date of this proxy statement. You are also advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements regarding business to be transacted at shareholder meetings. A copy of the bylaws may be obtained without charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary.
Notice of proposals that are not to be included in the proxy but brought before an annual meeting of shareholders must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary no less than 60 days and no more than 90 days prior to the annual meeting. Such notices under the bylaws must include (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for bringing such business before the meeting; and (b) as to the shareholder giving the notice, (i) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of such shareholder, (ii) the number of shares of the Company that are owned of record and beneficially by such shareholder, and (iii) any material interest of such shareholder in such business other than the shareholder's interest as a shareholder of the Company.
All other communications for the Board or an individual director should be submitted in writing to the attention of the Corporate Secretary.
EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION
Directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, e-mail or other online methods. We will pay all of the expenses of this solicitation of proxies, including reimbursing brokers, dealers, banks and other persons holding our common stock in their names, or in the names of nominees, for their expenses in providing proxy materials to the beneficial owners.
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
A single set of proxy materials may be delivered with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address, unless contrary instructions have been received. You may direct a written request for proxy materials to Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 13007, Roanoke, Virginia 24030.
FURTHER INFORMATION
Resources' 2018 Annual Report, including our Form 10-K and financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2018, is available without charge to any shareholder requesting the same. Written requests should be addressed to the attention of Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 13007, Roanoke, Virginia 24030.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K and financial statements, this proxy statement, proxy card, and the charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and the Governance and Nominating Committee are on the Company’s website at www.rgcresources.com.
By Order of the Board of Directors
PAUL W. NESTER
Corporate Secretary
December 14, 2018
19
TABLE OF CONTENTS