RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QuickLinks
-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________________
FORM 10-K
|
ý
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34851
______________________________________________________________
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
84-1573084
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
6312 S Fiddler’s Green Circle, Suite 200N
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Village, CO
|
|
80111
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(303) 846-6000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
______________________________________________________________
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
Name of each exchange on which registered: NASDAQ (Global Select Market)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer
ý
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Emerging growth company
o
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
o
No
ý
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates (based on the closing price on the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter on The NASDAQ Global Select Market) was
$824.0 million
. All executive officers and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be "affiliates" of the registrant.
There were
12,957,839
shares of common stock outstanding as of
February 26, 2018
.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information required for Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I
|
||
|
PART II
|
||
|
PART III
|
||
|
PART IV
|
||
1
Overview
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, primarily develops, operates, and franchises full-service restaurants in North America and focuses on serving an imaginative selection of high quality gourmet burgers in a fun environment welcoming to guests of all ages. We opened the first Red Robin® restaurant in Seattle, Washington in September 1969. In 1979, the first franchised Red Robin restaurant was opened in Yakima, Washington. In 2001, we formed Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and consummated a reorganization of the company. Since that time, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has owned, either directly or indirectly, all of the outstanding capital stock or membership interests, respectively, of Red Robin International, Inc. and our other operating subsidiaries through which we operate our Company-owned restaurants. Unless otherwise provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, references to “Red Robin,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries. As of the end of our fiscal year on
December 31, 2017
, there were
566
Red Robin restaurants, of which
480
were Company-owned and
86
were operated by franchisees. Our franchisees are independent organizations to whom we provide certain support. See “Restaurant Franchise and Licensing Arrangements” for additional information about our franchise program. As of
December 31, 2017
, there were Red Robin restaurants in
44
states and
two
Canadian provinces.
Financial information for our single operating segment is included in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
The Company’s fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the last Sunday of the calendar year. Fiscal year
2017
included 53 weeks, ending on
December 31, 2017
. Fiscal years
2016
,
2015
, 2014, and 2013 each included 52 weeks, ending on
December 25, 2016
,
December 27, 2015
, December 28, 2014, and December 29, 2013. Fiscal year 2018 will include 52 weeks, ending on December 30, 2018. We refer to our fiscal years as 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013 throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Business Strategy
Red Robin’s goal is to differentiate itself from typical casual dining establishments based on quality, service, and value. To differentiate on quality, we offer a large and varied selection of highly craveable and customizable burgers. To differentiate on service, our goal is to be highly attentive to guests of all ages, serving food and beverages quickly so they can spend more time enjoying their food and less time waiting. We also strive to deliver tremendous value by providing delicious food at a range of price points, accompanied with our bottomless steak fries and other sides with every meal. Red Robin guests give us credit for these key points of differentiation and we seek to build on them every day by living our B.U.R.G.E.R. values: Bottomless Fun, Unwavering Integrity, Relentless Focus on Improvement, Genuine Spirit of Service, Extraordinary People, and Recognized Burger Authority.
To ensure the continued success of Red Robin in a rapidly evolving marketplace, we focus on five strategic areas:
|
•
|
Building team member engagement.
We emphasize and support team member engagement, retention, and culture that will foster the development of great leaders. Our goal is to enhance clarity with our team members by consistently communicating our strategy and ensuring we remain narrowly focused on our strategic initiatives. We continually strive to develop extraordinary people and encourage team member performance through appreciation, recognition, and respect. In an effort to continue to develop leadership strength, we are focused on expanding our school of leadership, executing dynamic succession planning, and innovative recruiting and talent development. See “Learning and Development” below for additional information about our team member development initiatives.
|
|
•
|
Regaining operational edge.
Our strategy in regaining operational edge includes delivering consistently great burgers, accurately customized, and served quickly by our caring team members whether the guest chooses to dine in the restaurant or off premise. Our goal is to deliver exceptional service to our guests through promoting a “Better for Being Here” environment and continually strive to enhance our guest’s experience with a focus on guests of all ages and their occasions. We respect our guests’ need for the “gift of time” and remain committed to improving both speed of service and order accuracy.
|
|
•
|
Becoming our guests’ go-to for great burgers.
We continue to focus on being our guests’ go-to for great burgers by offering craveable burgers and “bottomless” side options at attractive prices wherever and however our guests want. We actively seek to enhance value through a balance of quality, quantity, price, and experience. This includes
|
2
providing high quality core menu items, delivering value through new products at everyday value prices and abundance through bottomless sides and beverages. We are enhancing loyalty offerings via our Red Robin Royalty™ program to drive guest traffic. Additionally, we are focused on driving guest preference by offering our products through alternate modes of access. As part of this strategy, we offer online ordering for carry-out, delivery access in limited locations via multiple third party services, and catering. We are also currently testing self-delivery for potential deployment in future years.
|
•
|
Rapidly reinventing Red Robin.
Facing rapidly increasing labor costs and changing guest needs, we are also working to transform our existing assets as needed with new labor models and to craft entirely new Red Robin prototypes which will enable future unit growth. We are dedicating resources to defining the “Red Robin of the Future.”
|
|
•
|
Delivering great shareholder value.
We are committed to delivering shareholder value by improving profitability and investing capital wisely. Our goal is to optimize our capital structure, pace development activities, and improve our EBITDA margin through revenue growth and targeted cost savings.
|
Restaurant Concept
The Red Robin brand has many desirable attributes, including a range of high-quality menu items, a strong guest-focused culture, and a value proposition designed to help our guests customize their experiences.
We pride ourselves on being THE Burger Authority. Our menu features our signature product, a line of Gourmet Burgers which we make from premium quality, fresh ground beef as well as our everyday-value line of Red’s Tavern Double® burgers, and our Red Robin’s Finest line of half-pound Angus beef burgers and all-natural, 7-ounce, fire-grilled chicken breasts with premium toppings. We also offer burgers made with chicken breasts, breaded cod and grilled salmon fillets, and turkey patties, as well as a proprietary vegetarian patty. We offer a wide selection of buns, including ciabatta, gluten free, sesame, onion, whole grain, jalapeno, and lettuce wraps, with a variety of toppings, including fresh guacamole, housemade barbeque sauces and aiolis, grilled pineapple, crispy onion straws, sautéed mushrooms, fried jalapenos, bruschetta salsa, coleslaw, eight different cheese choices, and a fried egg. All of our burgers are served with our all-you-can-eat Bottomless Steak Fries® or a guest may choose from five bottomless sides. We specialize in customizing our menu items to meet our guests’ dietary needs and preferences. In addition to burgers, which accounted for approximately 50% of our total food and beverage sales in 2017, Red Robin serves an array of other items that appeal to a broad range of guests. These items include a variety of appetizers (priced at $5, $7, and $9); salads, soups, seafood, and other entrees; desserts; the Company’s signature alcoholic and non-alcoholic specialty beverages; and a broadened variety of national and craft beers.
We strive to meet the needs of our guests by offering a choice of experiences and occasions from time-pressured meals to a place to relax and unwind with friends. Red Robin also has an unparalleled and extraordinary approach to guest service and we have cataloged thousands of stories of Red Robin team members who live our values. Many examples can be found on our website,
www.redrobin.com
. We encourage our team members to execute on the aspects of service that we have identified to be the biggest drivers of our guest loyalty. Note that our website and the information contained on or connected to our website are not incorporated by reference herein, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.
We also strive to provide our guests with exceptional dining value and the ability to customize their experience. In 2017, we had an average check per guest of $13.03 including beverages. We believe this price-to-value relationship, our innovative array of burgers starting at $6.99 and ranging up to $15.49, differentiates us from our casual dining competitors and allows us to appeal to a broad base of consumers with a wide range of income levels.
Operations
Restaurant Management
Our typical restaurant management team consists of a general manager, an assistant general manager, and two or three assistant managers depending on restaurant sales volumes. The management team of each restaurant is responsible for the day-to-day operation of that restaurant, including hiring, training, and coaching of team members, as well as operating results. Our typical restaurant employs approximately 58 hourly team members, most of whom work part-time.
For our new restaurants, we try to identify seasoned leadership teams 6 to 12 months in advance of opening, with the expectation that seasoned leadership will provide a better team member and guest experience while enabling a new restaurant to quickly reach normalized operations.
3
Learning and Development
We strive to maintain quality and consistency in each of our restaurants through the training and supervision of team members and the establishment of, and adherence to, high standards relating to team member performance, food and beverage preparation, and the maintenance of our restaurants. Each restaurant maintains a group of certified learning coaches who are tasked with preparing new team members for success by providing on-the-job training leading up to a final skills certification for their position. Team members seeking advancement have the opportunity to join our management development program as a Shift Supervisor.
Shift Supervisors complete an in-depth training curriculum that develops their ability to supervise all aspects of shift execution, including, but not limited to: food safety, food production, coaching, and financial aspects of the business. The Shift Supervisor program is an important stepping stone for hourly team members who desire a career in restaurant management.
New restaurant managers participate in our eight-week Management Foundations training program. This program hones each manager’s skills, specifically in two areas: flawless shift execution and effective coaching of team members.
Providing our restaurant teams the support and resources they need to be successful requires dedication, an of-service attitude, and the utmost professionalism on the part of our home office team. We ensure the home office team members have what they need to meet these demands by offering several avenues to enhance their professional development, including but not limited to an in-house leadership library of over 400 titles, more than 40 on-site and 12 off-site development workshop opportunities, as well as one-to-one coaching.
The success of each restaurant, region, and department within the organization relies heavily on the leadership at each of those levels. Leaders across the organization regularly receive a powerful assessment tool that provides them in-depth insight into the effectiveness of their leadership and the impact it is having on their teams. Additionally, leaders have the opportunity to be selected for our School of Leadership program which guides a cohort of 16 leaders through three retreats over the course of four months. This powerful program enables leaders to identify their purpose, their teams’ purpose, and the purpose they serve within the organization.
Food Safety and Purchasing
Our food safety and quality assurance programs help manage our commitment to quality ingredients and food preparation. Our systems are designed to protect our food supply from product receipt through preparation and service. We provide detailed specifications for our food ingredients, products, and supplies to our suppliers. We qualify and audit our key manufacturers and growers and require their certification under the Global Food Safety Initiative. Our restaurant managers are certified in a comprehensive safety and sanitation course by the National Restaurant Association’s ServSafe program. Minimum cooking requirements, specifically safe handling, cooling procedures, and frequent temperature and quality checks, exist for the safety and quality of all food we serve in our restaurants. In order to provide the freshest ingredients and products and to maximize operating efficiencies between purchase and usage, each restaurant’s management team determines the restaurant’s daily usage requirements for food ingredients, products, and supplies, and accordingly, orders from approved suppliers, and distributors. The restaurant management team inspects deliveries to ensure the products received meet our safety and quality specifications. Additionally, we utilize the services of an independent auditing company to perform unannounced comprehensive food safety and sanitation inspections up to four times a year in all Company-owned and franchised restaurants.
To maximize our purchasing efficiencies and obtain the best possible prices for our high-quality ingredients, products, and supplies, our centralized purchasing team negotiates supply agreements which may include fixed price contracts that vary in term lengths or formula based pricing agreements which can fluctuate on changes in raw material commodity pricing. Of our total cost of goods in 2017, ground beef represented approximately 13%, potatoes represented approximately 12%, and poultry represented approximately 10%. We monitor the primary commodities we purchase and extend contract positions when applicable in order to minimize the impact of fluctuations in price and availability. However, certain commodities, primarily ground beef, potatoes, and poultry, remain subject to market price fluctuations. We continue to identify competitively priced, high quality alternative manufacturers, suppliers, growers, and distributors that are available should the need arise; however, we have not experienced significant disruptions in our supply chain. As of
December 31, 2017
, approximately 59% of our estimated annual food and beverage purchases were covered by fixed price contracts, most of which are scheduled to expire at various times through the end of 2018.
Restaurant Development
Red Robin has grown its restaurant base prudently considering a number of factors including general economic conditions, expected financial performance, availability of appropriate locations, competition in local markets, and the
4
availability of teams to manage new locations. Our site selection criteria focuses on identifying markets, trade areas, and specific sites that are likely to yield the greatest density of desirable demographic characteristics, retail traffic, and visibility. During
2017
, we opened
18
Company-owned restaurants, including one restaurant that was temporarily closed during 2016, and relocated one Red Robin restaurant. Over the past three years, we have opened a total of
68
new restaurants, acquired
14
franchised restaurants, and relocated
six
units.
During 2018, we expect to open approximately nine new Company-owned Red Robin restaurants. The costs of a 4,500 to 5,800 square foot Red Robin restaurant range from $2.2 million to $2.6 million, depending on location (stand alone, mall, or in-line retail) and geographic area, excluding land. In developing our long-term growth strategy, we will carefully evaluate
our changing guest base, opportunities to broaden our reach, and how to address rising construction and labor costs.
Restaurant Franchise and Licensing Arrangements
As of
December 31, 2017
, our franchisees operated
86
restaurants in
15
states. Our two largest franchisees own 43 restaurants located in Michigan, Ohio, and eastern and central Pennsylvania. In
2017
, our franchisees opened one new restaurant and closed one restaurant. We executed area development agreements with two of our existing franchisees in 2017. We expect our franchisees will open new units in 2018, and anticipate franchise unit growth to continue as our franchisees complete required investments to bring existing restaurants to our current brand and design standards. We are identifying additional franchise opportunities to grow our franchise base through existing and new franchisees based on markets of interest.
Franchise Compliance Assurance
We actively work with and monitor our franchisees’ performance to help them develop and operate their restaurants in compliance with Red Robin’s standards, systems, and procedures. During the restaurant development phase, we review the franchisee’s site selection and provide the franchisee with our prototype building plans. We provide trainers to assist the franchisee in opening the restaurant for business. We advise the franchisee on all menu items, management training, and equipment and food purchases.
To continuously improve our marketing programs and operating systems, we maintain a franchise advisory board consisting of franchisee members that meet with the corporate executive team. Through this council, we solicit the input of our franchisees on marketing programs, including their suggestions as to which new menu items we should test and feature in future promotions. We also exchange best operating practices with our franchisees as we strive to improve our operating systems while attaining a high level of franchisee participation.
Information Technology
We rely on information systems in all aspects of our operations, including (but not limited to) point-of-sale transaction processing in our restaurants; operation of our restaurants; management of our inventories; collection of cash; payment of payroll and other obligations; and various other processes and procedures.
Our corporate offices and Company-owned restaurants are enabled with information technology and decision support systems. In our restaurants, these systems are designed to provide operational tools for sales, inventory, and labor management. This technology includes industry-specific, off-the-shelf systems, as well as proprietary software such as tools designed to optimize food and beverage costs and labor costs. These systems are integrated with our point-of-sale systems to provide daily, weekly, and period-to-date information that is important for managers to run an efficient and effective restaurant. We also use other systems to interact with our guests. These include online and in-restaurant guest feedback systems, which provide real-time results on guest service, food quality, and atmosphere to each of our restaurants.
We utilize centralized financial, accounting, and human resources/personnel systems for Company-owned restaurants. In addition, we use an operations scorecard which integrates data from our centralized systems with the distributed information managed in our restaurants. We believe these combined tools are important in analyzing and improving our operations, profit margins, and other results.
In 2017, we continued to invest in technologies and data infrastructure that support operational excellence, guest engagement, and team member talent management as well as facilitate our off-premise dining initiatives. In 2018, we plan to invest in technologies and data infrastructure which modernize and upgrade the capacity of our restaurant systems; upgrade our point-of-sale system; provide our guests with digital experiences that support in-restaurant and off-premise dining; and improve flexibility of business operations.
We accept electronic payment cards from our guests for payment in our restaurants. We also receive and maintain certain personal information about our guests and team members. We have systems and processes in place that focus on the protection
5
of our guests’ credit card information and other private information that we are required to protect, such as our team members’ personal information. We have taken a number of steps to prevent the occurrence of security breaches in this respect. Our systems have been carefully designed and configured to protect against data loss or compromise. For example, because of the number of credit card transactions processed in our Company-owned stores, we are required to maintain the highest level of Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) Data Security Standard compliance at our corporate offices and Company-owned restaurants. These standards, set by a consortium of the major credit card companies, require certain levels of system security and procedures to protect our customers’ credit card and other personal information.
We also engage security assessors and consultants to review and advise us on our other data security practices with respect to protection of other sensitive personal information that we obtain from guests and team members.
Marketing and Advertising
We build brand equity and awareness primarily through national marketing, including national television, digital media, social media programs, email, loyalty, and public relations initiatives. These programs are funded primarily through cooperative creative development and national media advertising funds.
In recent years, we have undertaken significant market research initiatives to gain feedback and perceptions in order to inform our business decisions. Among other things, we use a guest satisfaction tool in all restaurants that provides feedback from guests on their experiences. Restaurant managers use this information to help identify areas of focus to strengthen restaurant performance and track progress. We also continually monitor our performance relative to peers and test potential business drivers among both current and potential guests. We closely track the frequency and purchase behavior of guests who are members of our Red Robin Royalty
TM
loyalty program.
In 2016, our marketing strategy began to shift toward a concentrated, rather than continuous, media buying approach with a focus on generating significant reach and frequency during on-air advertising periods. We plan to continue with this concentrated marketing approach in 2018, while communicating a clear message focused on craveable burgers, affordable abundance, and attentive service across a variety of advertising media. We will also deploy marketing support for our alternative platforms initiative, including generating guest awareness of our online ordering, to-go, and catering dining opportunities.
Team Members
As of
December 31, 2017
, we had 29,349 employees, whom we refer to as team members, consisting of 28,978 team members at Company-owned restaurants and 371 team members at our corporate headquarters and field offices. None of our team members are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our team member relations to be good.
We support our team members by offering competitive wages and benefits for eligible team members, including medical and other insurance, an employee stock purchase plan, and equity-based awards for eligible corporate and operations employees at the director level and above. We motivate and prepare our team members by providing them with opportunities for increased responsibilities and advancement. At certain levels, we also offer performance-based incentives tied to sales, profitability, and/or certain qualitative measures.
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information about our executive officers and other key employees:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|||
|
Denny Marie Post
|
60
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(1)
|
||
|
Beverly K. Carmichael
|
59
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief People, Culture, and Resource Officer
|
||
|
Guy J. Constant
|
53
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
Jonathan Muhtar
|
46
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Concept Officer
|
||
|
Carin L. Stutz
|
61
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
||
|
Dana Benfield
|
46
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
|
||
|
Dean Cookson
|
48
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
||
|
Michael L. Kaplan
|
49
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
|
||
(1)
Also a member of the Company’s board of directors.
6
Denny Marie Post.
Ms. Post was appointed Chief Executive Officer in August 2016. Ms. Post previously served the Company in various roles as its President, Executive Vice President and Chief Concept Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. Before joining Red Robin, she was the Managing Member of mm&i Consulting LLC, a marketing consulting firm, from June 2010 to July 2011. Ms. Post served as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer of T-Mobile USA from July 2008 to May 2010, as Senior Vice President, Global Beverage, Food, and Quality at Starbucks Corporation from February 2007 to June 2008, as Senior Vice President, Chief Concept Officer of Burger King Corp. from April 2004 to January 2007, and prior to that, in various marketing executive roles at YUM! Brands, Inc. from 1996 to 2004.
Beverly K. Carmichael.
Ms. Carmichael joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief People, Culture, and Resource Officer in December 2017. Ms. Carmichael previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store from January 2014 to December 2017. Prior to that, she was Founder and President of Star HR, LLC from April 2010 to April 2014. She served as Chief People Officer and Executive Vice President of Human Resources at Ticketmaster from August 2006 to August 2009. Prior to joining Ticketmaster, she was Vice President of HR at Rockwell Collins and spent 10 years at Southwest Airlines in various roles including Senior Vice President of Labor and Employee Relations; Vice President, People (Human Resources); and Chief Counsel, Labor and Employment.
Guy J. Constant.
Mr. Constant joined Red Robin as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 2016. Mr. Constant previously served as Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Treasurer of Rent-A-Center, Inc. from June 2014 to December 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Constant was the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Brinker International Inc. from September 2010 to March 2014. At Brinker, he also served as Senior Vice President of Finance from May 2008 to September 2010, Vice President of Strategic Planning and Analysis and Investor Relations from September 2005 to May 2008, and Senior Director of Compensation from November 2004 to September 2005. Prior to Brinker, he spent nine years at AMR Corporation, the parent company of American Airlines, in various finance positions of increasing scope and responsibility.
Jonathan Muhtar
. Mr. Muhtar was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Concept Officer of the Company, effective January 1, 2018. Mr. Muhtar previously served the Company as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer from December 2015 until his promotion. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Muhtar served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Captain D’s Seafood Restaurant from November 2011 to December 2015, and as Vice President of Global Marketing and Innovation and in other corporate and marketing positions at Burger King Corporation from July 2004 to June 2011.
Carin L. Stutz.
Ms. Stutz joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in April 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Stutz served as President of McAlister’s Corporation of Focus Brands Inc. from November 2014 to April 2016. Ms. Stutz was the Chief Executive Officer and President of Cosi Inc. from January 2012 to June 2013. She was President of Global Business Development of Brinker International Inc. from December 2010 to December 2011. She also served as Senior Vice President of Strategic Operations and Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Global Business Development at Brinker beginning in January 2009. Prior to joining Brinker, she served as Senior Vice President of Company Operations of Applebee’s International Inc. from 1999 to 2005 and as Executive Vice President of Operations of Applebee’s from 2005 to 2007.
Dana Benfield
. Ms. Benfield was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer in November 2017. Ms. Benfield previously served the Company in various roles as Vice President of Marketing, Vice President of Engagement Marketing, Director of Loyalty and Retention, and National Promotions Manager. Prior to joining Red Robin in 2002, she served as an Account Manager for Karsh & Hagan Advertising.
Dean Cookson
. Mr. Cookson joined Red Robin as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer in September 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cookson served as Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Virgin America Inc. from February 2011 to January 2017. He served as Vice President of Business Development at Basho Technologies, Inc. from April 2010 to February 2011. Prior to joining Basho, he served as Chief of Operations for Snapfish from June 2009 to April 2010. He also served as VP of Systems and Support Operations at Snapfish from February 2007 to June 2009. Prior to joining Snapfish, he served as Director of Production Operations at LookSmart Group, Inc. from 2002 to 2007.
Michael L. Kaplan.
Mr. Kaplan joined Red Robin as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary in October 2013. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Security Officer and Corporate Secretary of DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. (d/b/a Standard Aero), a privately held global aviation maintenance company, from January 2010 to September 2013, and as a Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, an international law firm, from January 2002 to January 2010.
7
Competition
The restaurant industry is highly competitive and our guests may choose to purchase food at supermarkets or other food retailers. For some occasions, we compete against other segments of the restaurant industry, including quick-service and fast-casual restaurants, but our primary competition is with other sit-down, casual dining restaurants. In addition, we compete to attract guests for off-premise dining occasions, including online ordering, delivery, to-go, and catering. The number, size, and strength of competitors vary by region, concept, market, and even restaurant. We compete on the basis of taste, quality, price of food offered, guest service, ambiance, location, and overall dining experience. In particular, we face competition from concepts focused on the sale of hamburgers, including quick service, and fast casual concepts. Many of these concepts are expanding faster than we are and are penetrating both geographic and demographic markets that we target as well. Moreover, many of these concepts compete with smaller-sized building units, which allow them greater flexibility in site selection and market penetration.
We believe that our guest demographics, strong brand recognition, gourmet burger concept, attractive price-value relationship, and the quality of our food and service enable us to differentiate ourselves from our competitors. We believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. Our competitors include well-established national chains which have more substantial marketing resources. We also compete with many other restaurant and retail establishments for site locations and team members.
Seasonality
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the summer months and winter holiday season due to factors including our retail-oriented locations and family appeal. As a result, our quarterly and annual operating results and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate significantly as a result of seasonality. Accordingly, results for any one quarter or year are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year, and comparable restaurant sales for any particular future period may decrease.
Trademarks
We have a number of registered trademarks and service marks, including the Red Robin, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers®, Red Robin America’s Gourmet Burgers & Spirits®, Red Robin Burger Works®, “YUMMM®”, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers and Brews
TM,
and Red Robin Royalty
TM
names and logos. We have registered or filed applications for trademarks for these marks, among others, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and we have applied to register various trademarks in certain other international jurisdictions.
In order to better protect our brand, we have also registered the Internet domain name
www.redrobin.com
. We believe that our trademarks, service marks, and other intellectual property rights have significant value and are important to our brand building efforts and the marketing of our restaurant concept.
Government Regulation
Our restaurants are subject to licensing and regulation by state, province, and local health, safety, fire, and other authorities, including licensing requirements, and regulations for the sale of alcoholic beverages and food. To date, we have been able to obtain and maintain all necessary licenses, permits, and approvals. The development and construction of new restaurants is subject also to compliance with applicable zoning, land use, and environmental regulations. We are also subject to federal regulation and state laws that regulate the offer and sale of franchises and substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Various federal and state labor laws govern our relationship with our team members and affect operating costs. These laws govern minimum wage requirements, overtime pay, meal and rest breaks, unemployment tax rates, health care and benefits, workers’ compensation rates, citizenship or residency requirements, child labor regulations, and discriminatory conduct. Federal, state and local government agencies have established or are in the process of establishing regulations requiring that we disclose to our guests nutritional information regarding the items we serve.
Available Information
We maintain a link to investor relations information on our website,
www.redrobin.com
, where we make available, free of charge, our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. All SEC filings are also available at the
8
SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov.
Our website and the information contained on or connected to our website are not incorporated by reference herein, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information and statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”) codified at Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. This statement is included for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provisions of the PSLRA. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical facts. These statements may be identified, without limitation, by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions. Certain forward-looking statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, principally in the sections captioned “Business,” “Legal Proceedings,” “Consolidated Financial Statements,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements relate to, among other things:
|
•
|
our business objectives and strategic plans, including growth in guest traffic and revenue; improvements in operational efficiencies and expense management; enhancing our restaurant environments and guest engagement; expanding our restaurant base; and designing, testing, and implementing restaurant development activities;
|
|
•
|
our ability to grow our average check and increase sales of incremental items;
|
|
•
|
our focus on attracting new guests while retaining loyal guests and our initiatives targeted at adult guests as our restaurant concept evolves;
|
|
•
|
our ability to grow sales through menu and service enhancement;
|
|
•
|
any future price increases and their effect on our revenue and profit;
|
|
•
|
the timing and cost of our investment and implementation of a major overhaul of our information technology systems and data infrastructure to support guest engagement, team member talent management, and anticipated related benefits;
|
|
•
|
anticipated Company-owned restaurant openings in both new and existing markets, including the anticipated number and type of new restaurants, and the timing of such openings;
|
|
•
|
anticipated restaurant operating costs, including commodity and food prices; labor and energy costs; and selling, general, and administrative expenses, as well as the effect of inflation on such costs and our ability to reduce overhead costs and improve efficiencies;
|
|
•
|
anticipated legislation and other regulation of our business, including minimum wage standards;
|
|
•
|
our brand transformation initiatives, including the anticipated number and timing of restaurant remodels, and expected financial performance of remodeled restaurants;
|
|
•
|
developing, testing, and implementing new initiatives, such as online ordering services, third-party delivery services, utilizing an offsite call center to handle to-go orders, developing new to-go packaging, and catering services, and addressing operating issues associated with these initiatives;
|
|
•
|
the amount of capital expenditures in 2018;
|
|
•
|
our expectation that we will have adequate cash from operations and credit facility borrowings to meet all future debt service, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements in 2018 and beyond;
|
|
•
|
anticipated retention of future cash flows to fund our operations and expansion of our business, to fund growth opportunities, to pay down debt, or to repurchase stock;
|
|
•
|
the sufficiency of the supply of our food, supplies, and labor pool to carry on our business;
|
|
•
|
our franchise program, franchisee new restaurant openings and remodels, and potential expansion and other changes to our franchise program;
|
|
•
|
anticipated interest and tax expense;
|
|
•
|
the continuation of our share repurchase program, and other capital deployment opportunities;
|
|
•
|
expectations regarding our operations in Canada and the resulting currency fluctuation risk related thereto;
|
|
•
|
expectations about any future interest rate swap;
|
|
•
|
the effect of the adoption of new accounting standards on our financial and accounting systems and analysis programs;
|
|
•
|
expectations regarding competition and our competitive advantages against our casual dining peers; and
|
|
•
|
expectations regarding consumer preferences and consumer discretionary spending.
|
9
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such expectations may prove to be materially incorrect due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
In some cases, information regarding certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from a forward-looking statement appears together with such statement. In addition, the factors described under Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and Risk Factors, as well as other possible factors not listed, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the following: the effectiveness of our business strategy and improvement initiatives; effectiveness of our marketing campaign; our ability to effectively use and monitor social media; uncertainty regarding general economic conditions; concentration of restaurants in certain markets, and lack of market awareness in new markets; changes in consumer disposable income; consumer spending trends and habits; ineffectiveness of our information technology efforts; regional mall and lifestyle center traffic trends; increased competition and discounting in the casual dining restaurant market; costs and availability of food and beverage inventory; changes in commodity prices, particularly ground beef; changes in energy and labor costs, including due to changes in health care, and market wage levels; changes in government laws and regulations affecting the operation of our restaurants, including but not limited to, minimum wages, consumer health and safety, health insurance coverage, nutritional disclosures, and employment eligibility-related documentation requirements; limitations on the Company’s ability to execute stock repurchases due to lack of available shares or acceptable stock price levels or other market or Company-specific conditions; our ability to attract qualified managers, and team members; changes in the availability of capital or credit facility borrowings; costs and other effects of legal claims by team members, franchisees, customers, vendors, stockholders, and others, including settlement of those claims or negative publicity regarding food safety or cyber security; weather conditions, and related events in regions where our restaurants are operated; and changes in accounting standards policies, and practices or related interpretations by auditors or regulatory entities.
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances.
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully read and consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The occurrence of any of the following risks could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The trading price or value of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. When making an investment decision with respect to our common stock, you should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our business strategy may not be successful or achieve the desired results, which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.
Our business strategy is designed to allow Red Robin to achieve success in a rapidly evolving marketplace. Our strategy focuses on building Team Member engagement, regaining our operational edge, becoming guests’ go-to for great burgers, rapidly reinventing Red Robin, and delivering great shareholder value.
Ongoing initiatives supporting our strategy include online ordering services, using an offsite call center to receive to-go orders, catering services, and delivery of orders directly or through third parties. These initiatives may not increase our sales to the degree and on the timing we expect, or at all. Catering, online ordering, and other out-of-restaurant sales options also introduce new operating procedures to our restaurants and increase reliance on third parties. We may not successfully execute these procedures and are not in control of the experience provided by third parties, which could adversely impact the guest experience and, as a result, harm guest perception of our brand and sales. Our business depends upon our ability to continue to grow and evolve through various important strategic initiatives. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop or implement these or other important strategic initiatives, or that the Company has, or will have, sufficient resources to fully and successfully implement, sustain results from, or achieve additional expected benefits from them, which could in turn adversely affect our business.
10
Our success depends on our ability to effectively compete in the restaurant industry to attract and retain guests.
Competition in the restaurant industry is intense and barriers to entry are low. Our competitors include a large and diverse group of restaurants in all segments ranging from quick serve and fast casual to polished casual and those verging on fine dining. These competitors range from independent local operators that have opened restaurants in various markets, high growth targeted “better” burger concepts in the quick serve and fast casual space, to the well-capitalized national restaurant companies. Many of these concepts have already captured segments of the market that we are targeting, such as adult-only occasions, and are expanding faster than we are, penetrating both desirable geographic and demographic markets. Many of our competitors are well established in the casual dining market segment and in certain geographic locations and some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we have available. Accordingly, they may be better equipped than us to increase marketing or to take other measures to maintain their competitive position, including the use of significant discount offers to attract guests. We also compete with other restaurants and retail establishments for real estate and attractive locations.
Our marketing and branding strategies to attract, engage, and retain our guests may not be successful, which could negatively affect our business.
We continue to evolve our marketing and branding strategies in order to appeal to customers and compete effectively to attract, engage, and retain customers. Our unique loyalty program, “Red Robin Royalty™” has experienced some success in driving sales and guest counts by providing loyal guests with various incentives and rewards. We intend to continue our focus on serving families while targeting adult occasions, and to grow beverage and food sales, including alcoholic beverages, appetizers and desserts, through menu and service enhancements. We do not have any assurance our marketing strategies will be successful. If new advertising, modified branding, and other marketing programs and methods are not successful, we may not generate the level of restaurant sales or guest traffic we expect and the expense associated with these programs may negatively affect our financial results. Moreover, many of our competitors have larger marketing resources and more extensive national marketing strategies and media usage and we may not be able to successfully compete against those established programs.
Our inability to effectively use and monitor social media could harm our marketing efforts as well as our reputation, which could negatively impact our restaurant sales and financial performance.
As part of our marketing efforts, we rely on search engine marketing and social media platforms such as Facebook® and Twitter® to attract and retain guests. As a result, we need to continuously innovate and develop our social media strategies in order to maintain broad appeal. Many of our competitors are expanding their use of social media and new social media platforms are rapidly being developed, potentially making more traditional social media platforms obsolete. Social media can be challenging because it reaches a broad audience with an ability to respond or react, in near real time, with comments that are often not filtered or checked for accuracy. In addition, social media can facilitate the improper disclosure of proprietary information, exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, or out-of-date information. As a result, if we do not appropriately manage our social media strategies, our marketing efforts in this area may not be successful and any failure (or perceived failure) to effectively respond to negative or potentially damaging social media chatter, whether accurate or not, could damage our reputation, negatively impacting our restaurant sales and financial performance. The inappropriate use of social media vehicles by our guests or team members could increase our costs, lead to litigation, or result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation.
A privacy or security breach involving our information technology systems or the failure of our data security measures could interrupt our business, damage our reputation, and negatively affect our operations and profits.
The protection of customer, employee and company data is critical to us. We are subject to laws relating to information security, privacy, cashless payments, consumer credit, and fraud. Additionally, an increasing number of government and industry groups have established laws and standards for the protection of personal and health information. The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, with the frequent imposition of new and constantly changing requirements. Compliance with these requirements may result in cost increases due to necessary system changes and the development of new administrative processes, and if we fail to comply with the laws and regulations regarding privacy and security, we could be exposed to risks of fines, investigations, litigation and disruption of our operations.
Moreover, we accept electronic payment cards from our guests for payment in our restaurants. In the ordinary course of our business, we receive and maintain certain personal information from our guests, team members, and vendors, and we process guest payments using payment information. Customers and employees have a high expectation that we will adequately protect their personal information. Third parties may have the technology or know-how to breach the security of this customer information, and our security measures and those of our technology vendors may not effectively prohibit others from obtaining
11
improper access to this information. A number of restaurant operators and retailers have experienced security breaches in which credit and debit card information may have been stolen. Although we employ security technologies and practices, and have taken other steps to try to prevent a breach, we may nevertheless not have the resources or technical sophistication to prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber attacks. If we have experienced, or in the future experience, a security breach, we could become subject to claims, lawsuits, or other proceedings for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the theft of credit or debit card information, compromised security and information systems, failure of our employees to comply with applicable laws, the unauthorized acquisition or use of such information by third parties, or other similar claims. Any such incidents or proceedings could disrupt the operation of our restaurants, adversely affect our reputation, guest confidence, and our results of operations, or result in the imposition of penalties or cause us to incur significant unplanned losses and expenditures, including those necessary to remediate any damage to persons whose personal information may have been compromised. Although we have established a consumer cyber security “bill of rights” for our guests, which includes a number of procedures designed to increase transparency and address our guests’ concerns regarding data breaches (whether actual or perceived), this policy may not be effective in addressing those concerns, which may in turn adversely affect our reputation and guest confidence. We maintain a separate insurance policy covering cyber security risks and such insurance coverage may, subject to policy terms and conditions, cover certain aspects of cyber risks, but is subject to a retention amount and may not be applicable to a particular incident or otherwise may be insufficient to cover all our losses beyond any retention. Further, in light of recent court rulings and amendments to policy forms, there is uncertainty as to whether traditional commercial general liability policies will be construed to cover the expenses related to a cyber attack and breaches if credit and debit card information is stolen.
Because of the number of credit card transactions we process, we are required to maintain the highest level of PCI Data Security Standard compliance at our corporate offices and Company-owned restaurants. As part of an overall security program and to meet PCI standards, we undergo regular external vulnerability scans and we are reviewed by a third-party assessor. As PCI standards change, we may be required to implement additional security measures. If we do not maintain the required level of PCI compliance, we could be subject to costly fines or additional fees from the card brands that we accept, or lose our ability to accept those payment cards. Our franchisees are separate businesses that have different levels of compliance required depending on the number of credit card transactions processed. If our franchisees fail to maintain the appropriate level of PCI compliance or they experience a security breach, it could negatively impact their business operations, and we could face a loss of or reduction in royalties or other payments they are required to remit to us and it could adversely affect our reputation and guest confidence.
Changes in consumer preferences could negatively affect our results of operations.
The restaurant industry is characterized by the continual introduction of new concepts and is subject to rapidly changing consumer preferences, tastes, and eating and purchasing habits. Our restaurants compete on the basis of a varied menu and feature burgers, salads, soups, appetizers, other entrees, desserts, and our signature alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages in a family-friendly atmosphere. Our continued success depends, in part, upon the continued popularity of these foods and this style of casual dining. Shifts in consumer preferences away from this cuisine or dining style could have a material adverse effect on our future profitability. In addition, competitors’ use of significant advertising and food discounting could influence our guests’ dining choices. One of our strategies is to provide a balance of both family-friendly and adult-focused guest experiences. There is no assurance that this balance will be successful or that it will not negatively affect our family guest experience.
Further, changing health or dietary preferences may cause consumers to avoid our products in favor of alternative foods. The food service industry as a whole rests on consumer preferences and demographic trends at the local, regional, national, and international levels, and the effect on consumer eating habits of new information regarding diet, nutrition, and health. New laws requiring additional nutritional information to be disclosed on our menus, changes in nutritional guidelines issued by the federal government agencies, issuance of similar guidelines or statistical information by other federal, state or local municipalities, or academic studies, among other things, may affect consumer choice and cause consumers to significantly alter their dining choices in ways that adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Our inability to renew existing leases on favorable terms may adversely affect our results of operations.
As of December 31, 2017, 444 of our 480 Company-owned restaurants are located on leased premises. There can be no assurance we will be able to renew our expiring leases after the expiration of all remaining renewal options. As a result we may incur additional costs to operate our restaurants, including increased rent and other costs related to the negotiation of terms of occupancy of an existing leased premise. If we are unable to renew a lease or determine not to renew a lease, there may be costs related to the relocation and development of a replacement restaurant or, if we are unable to relocate, reduced revenue.
12
The global and domestic economic environment may negatively affect consumer spending and guest visits, which may negatively affect our revenues and our results of operations and may continue to do so in the future.
The global and domestic economic environment affects the restaurant industry, and may negatively affect the results of operations and financial condition of the Company and its customers, distributors, and suppliers. These conditions include unemployment, weakness and lack of consistent improvement in the housing markets; downtrend or delays in residential or commercial real estate development; volatility in financial markets; inflationary pressures; and reduced consumer confidence. As a result, our guests may be apprehensive about the economy and maintain or further reduce their level of discretionary spending. This could affect the frequency with which our guests choose to dine out or the amount they spend on meals, thereby decreasing our revenues and potentially negatively affecting our operating results. Also, our guests may choose to purchase food at supermarkets or other food retailers. We believe there is a risk that prolonged negative or uncertain economic conditions might cause consumers to make long-lasting changes to their discretionary spending behavior, including dining out less frequently on a more permanent basis, which would have a negative effect on our business. Moreover, our restaurants are primarily located near high density retail areas such as regional malls, lifestyle centers, big box shopping centers, and entertainment centers. We depend on a high volume of visitors at these centers to attract guests to our restaurants. A decline in development or closures of businesses in these settings or a decline in visitors to retail areas near our restaurants could negatively affect our restaurant sales.
Our operations are susceptible to the changes in cost and availability of commodities which could negatively affect our operating results.
Our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in commodity costs. Various factors beyond our control, including adverse weather conditions, governmental regulation and monetary policy, potential imposition of tariffs on imports from other countries, product availability, recalls of food products, and seasonality, as well as the effects of the current macroeconomic environment on our suppliers, may affect our commodity costs or cause a disruption in our supply chain. In an effort to mitigate some of this risk, we enter into fixed price agreements on some of our food and beverage products, including certain proteins, produce and cooking oil. As of the end of 2017, 59% of our estimated 2018 annual food and beverage purchases were covered by fixed price contracts, most of which are scheduled to expire at various times during 2018. Changes in the price or availability of commodities for which we do not have fixed price contracts could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. Expiring contracts with our food suppliers could also result in unfavorable renewal terms and therefore increase costs associated with these suppliers or may necessitate negotiations with alternate suppliers. We may be unable to obtain favorable contract terms with suppliers or adjust our purchasing practices and menu prices to respond to changing food costs, and a failure to do so could negatively affect our operating results.
We may experience interruptions in the delivery of food and other products from third parties.
Our restaurants depend on frequent deliveries of fresh produce, food, beverage and other products. This subjects us to the risk of interruptions in food and beverage supplies that may result from a variety of causes including, but not limited to, outbreaks of food-borne illness, disruption of operation of production facilities, the financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, of our suppliers or other unforeseen circumstances. Such shortages could adversely affect our revenue and profits. Our restaurants bear risks associated with the timeliness of deliveries by suppliers and distributors as well as the solvency, reputation, labor relationships, freight rates, and health and safety standards of each supplier and distributor. Other significant risks associated with our suppliers and distributors include improper handling of food and beverage products and/or the adulteration or contamination of such food and beverage products.
Price increases may negatively affect guest visits.
We may make future price increases, primarily to offset increased costs and operating expenses. We cannot provide assurance that any future price increases will not deter guests from visiting our restaurants, reduce the frequency of their visits, or affect their purchasing decisions.
New or improved technologies or changes in consumer behavior facilitated by these technologies could negatively affect our business.
Advances in technologies or certain changes in consumer behavior driven by such technologies could have a negative effect on our business. Technology and consumer offerings continue to develop, and we expect that new or enhanced technologies and consumer offerings will be available in the future. We may pursue certain of those technologies and consumer offerings if we believe they offer a sustainable guest proposition and can be successfully integrated into our business model. However, we cannot predict consumer acceptance of these delivery channels or their impact on our business. In addition, our competitors, some of whom have greater resources than us, may be able to benefit from changes in technologies or consumer
13
acceptance of such changes, which could harm our competitive position. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully respond to changing consumer preferences, including with respect to new technologies or to effectively adjust our product mix, service offerings, and marketing initiatives for products and services that address, and anticipate advances in, technology, and market trends. If we are not able to successfully respond to these challenges, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be harmed.
If there is a material failure in our information technology systems, our business operations and profits could be negatively affected, and our systems may be inadequate to support our future growth strategies.
We rely heavily on information technology systems in all aspects of our operations including our restaurant point-of sale systems, financial systems, marketing programs, employee engagement, supply chain management, cyber-security, and various other processes and transactions. Our ability to effectively manage and run our business depends on the reliability and capacity of our information technology systems, including technology services and systems for which we contract from third parties. These systems and services may be insufficient to effectively manage and run our business. These systems and our business needs will continue to evolve and require upgrading and maintenance over time, consequently requiring significant future commitments of resources and capital.
Moreover, these technology services and systems, communication systems, and electronic data could be subject or vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, terrorist attacks, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, loss of data, data breaches, or other attempts to harm our systems. See “
-A privacy or security breach involving our information technology systems or the failure of our data security measures could interrupt our business, damage our reputation, and negatively affect our operations and profits
” above. A failure of these systems to operate effectively, problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or any other failure to maintain a continuous and secure information technology network for any of the above reasons could result in interruption and delays in guest services, adversely affect our reputation, and negatively impact our results of operations.
We rely on our management team for the development and execution of our business strategy and the loss of any member of our management team could negatively affect our operating results.
Our key team members are central to our success and difficult to replace. We may be unable to retain them or attract other highly qualified team members, particularly if we do not offer competitive employment terms. The loss of the services of any of our management team or the failure to implement an appropriate succession plan could prevent us from achieving our business strategy and initiatives, which could adversely affect our operating results.
Expanding our restaurant base is a component of our long-term growth and our ability to open and profitably operate new restaurants is subject to factors beyond our control.
The expansion of our restaurant base depends in large part on our ability and the ability of our franchisees to timely and efficiently open new restaurants and to operate these restaurants on a profitable basis. Delays or failures in opening new restaurants, or the inability to profitably operate them once opened, could materially and adversely affect our planned growth. The success of our expansion strategy and the success of new restaurants depends upon numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
|
•
|
improvement in the macroeconomic environment nationally and regionally that affects restaurant-level performance and influences our decisions on the rate of expansion, timing, and the number of restaurants to be opened;
|
|
•
|
identification of and ability to secure an adequate supply of available and suitable restaurant sites;
|
|
•
|
negotiation of favorable lease and construction terms;
|
|
•
|
cost and availability of capital to fund restaurant expansion and operation;
|
|
•
|
the availability of construction materials and labor;
|
|
•
|
our ability to manage construction and development costs of new restaurants;
|
|
•
|
timely adherence to development schedules;
|
|
•
|
securing required governmental approvals and permits and in a timely manner;
|
|
•
|
availability and retention of qualified operating personnel to staff our new restaurants, especially managers;
|
|
•
|
competition in our markets and general economic conditions that may affect consumer spending or choice;
|
|
•
|
our ability to attract and retain guests; and
|
|
•
|
our ability to operate at acceptable profit margins.
|
14
We are subject to the risks presented by acquisitions.
As part of our expansion efforts, we have acquired some of our franchised restaurants in the past. In the future, we may, from time to time, consider opportunistic acquisitions of restaurants operated by franchisees or other operators. Any future acquisitions will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions. These risks include among other things:
|
•
|
the difficulty of integrating operations and personnel;
|
|
•
|
the potential disruption to our ongoing business;
|
|
•
|
the potential distraction of management;
|
|
•
|
the inability to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies; and
|
|
•
|
the impairment of relationships with team members and guests as a result of changes in ownership and management.
|
New or less mature restaurants, once opened, may vary in profitability and levels of operating revenue for six months or more.
New and less mature restaurants typically experience higher operating costs in both dollars and percentage of revenue initially when compared to restaurants in the comparable restaurant base. Although the average unit volumes and restaurant level profit margins have performed well on average in recent years, there is no assurance that new restaurants will continue to experience such successes. Our restaurants are currently taking approximately six months or more to reach normalized operating levels due to inefficiencies typically associated with new restaurants. These include operating costs, which are often significantly greater during the first several months of operation and fluctuating guest counts. Further, there is no assurance that our less mature restaurants will attain operating results similar to those of our existing restaurants.
The large number of Company-owned restaurants concentrated in the western United States makes us susceptible to changes in economic and other trends in that region and restaurant expansion in our existing markets could erode sales of our existing restaurants.
As of December 31, 2017, a total of 183 or 38.1% of all Company-owned restaurants, representing 45.6% of restaurant revenue, were located in the western United States (i.e., Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, Idaho, New Mexico, and Washington). As a result of our geographic concentration, negative publicity regarding any of our restaurants in the western United States could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations, as could other regional occurrences such as local strikes, energy shortages, or increases in energy prices, droughts, earthquakes, fires, or other natural disasters.
Because we typically draw guests from a relatively small radius around each of our restaurants, the sales performance, and guest counts for existing restaurants near the area in which a new restaurant opens may decline due to the opening of the new restaurant.
Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly due to various risks and unexpected circumstances, including increases in costs, seasonality, weather, and other factors outside our control.
We are subject to a number of significant risks that might cause our actual quarterly and annual results to fluctuate significantly or be negatively affected. These risks include but are not limited to: extended periods of inclement weather which may affect guest visits as well as limit the availability and cost of key commodities such as beef, poultry, potatoes, and other items that are important ingredients in our products; material disruptions in our supply chain; changes in borrowings and interest rates; changes to accounting methods or philosophies; impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill, and losses on restaurant closures; and unanticipated expenses from natural disasters and repairs to damaged or lost property.
Moreover, our business fluctuates seasonally. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the summer months and winter holiday season. As a result, our quarterly and annual operating results and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate significantly as a result of seasonality and the factors discussed above. Accordingly, results for any one quarter or year are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year, and comparable restaurant sales for any particular future period may decrease.
Our franchisees could take actions that could harm our business, expose us to liability or damage our reputation.
Franchisees are independent entities and are not our employees, partners, or affiliates. We share with our franchisees what we believe to be best practices in the restaurant industry; however, franchisees operate their restaurants as independent businesses. Consequently, the quality of franchised restaurant operations may be diminished by any number of factors beyond our control. Moreover, franchisees may not successfully operate restaurants in a manner consistent with our standards and requirements or may not hire and train qualified managers and other restaurant personnel. In addition, as independent
15
businesses, franchisees may not be required to comply with the same levels of business or regulatory compliance that we are. While we try to ensure that the quality of our brand and compliance with our operating standards, and the confidentiality thereof, are maintained by all of our franchisees, we cannot provide assurance that our franchisees will avoid actions that negatively affect the reputation of Red Robin or the value of our proprietary information. Our image and reputation and the image and reputation of other franchisees may suffer materially, and system-wide sales could significantly decline if our franchisees do not operate restaurants according to our standards.
Further, we are subject to federal and state laws that regulate the offer and sale of franchises and aspects of the licensor-licensee relationship. Also, there may be circumstances in which we may be held liable for the actions of our franchisees. In a 2014 action, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alleged that McDonald’s USA, LLC (the parent-franchisor company for McDonald’s restaurants) could be jointly liable for labor and wage violations by its franchisees. If upheld, liability for franchisees’ overtime, wage, or union-organization violations could be pursued against us. Failure to comply with the laws and regulations governing our franchisee relationships or adverse decisions similar to the above-described NLRB action could subject us to liability for actions of the franchisees, or expose us to liability to franchisees, or fines and penalties for non-compliance.
Decreased cash flow from operations, or an inability to access credit could negatively affect our business initiatives or may result in our inability to execute our revenue, expense, and capital deployment strategies.
Our ability to fund our operating plans and to implement our capital deployment strategies depends on sufficient cash flow from operations or other financing, including using funding under our revolving credit agreement. Our capital deployment strategies include but are not limited to paying down debt, new restaurant development, investment in advertising, repurchases of our stock, and franchise expansion. If we experience decreased cash flow from operations, our ability to fund our operations and planned initiatives, and to take advantage of growth opportunities, may be delayed or negatively affected. In addition, these disruptions or a negative effect on our revenues could affect our ability to borrow or comply with our covenants under our credit facility. Moreover, any repurchase by us of our shares of common stock will further reduce cash available for operations and future growth, as well as debt repayment.
Our future success depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property.
Our business prospects will depend in part on our ability to protect our proprietary information and intellectual property, including the Red Robin, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers®, Red Robin America’s Gourmet Burgers & Spirits®, Red Robin Burger Works®, “YUMMM®”, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers and Brews
TM,
and Red Robin Royalty
TM
names and logos. We have registered or filed applications for trademarks for these names and logos, among others, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in Canada and we have applied to register various trademarks in certain other international jurisdictions. Our trademarks could be infringed in ways that leave us without redress, such as by imitation or by filings by others in jurisdictions where we are not currently registered. In addition, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how in operating our restaurants, and we employ various methods to protect those trade secrets and that proprietary know-how. However, such methods may not afford adequate protection and others could independently develop similar know-how or obtain access to our know-how, concepts, and recipes. Consequently, our business could be negatively affected and less profitable if we are unable to successfully defend and protect our intellectual property.
We are subject to economic, political, regulatory, and other risks related to our international operations.
As of December 31, 2017, we owned 18 Red Robin restaurants in Canada and may have further international expansion in the future. Operating in international markets requires significant resources and management attention and will subject us to regulatory, economic, and political risks that are different from and incremental to those in the United States. In addition to the risks that we face in the United States, our international operations involve risks that could adversely affect our business, including:
|
•
|
the need to adapt our brand for specific cultural and language differences:
|
|
•
|
new and different sources of competition;
|
|
•
|
difficulties and costs associated with staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
•
|
difficulties in adapting and sourcing product specifications for international restaurant locations;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could impact revenues and expenses of our international operations and expose us to foreign currency exchange rate risk;
|
|
•
|
difficulties in complying with local laws, regulations, and customs in foreign jurisdictions;
|
|
•
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
16
|
•
|
political or social unrest and economic instability; compliance with U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and similar laws in foreign jurisdictions;
|
|
•
|
differences in enforceability of intellectual property and contract rights;
|
|
•
|
adverse tax consequences;
|
|
•
|
profit repatriation and other restrictions on the transfer of funds; and
|
|
•
|
different and more stringent user protection, data protection, privacy and other laws.
|
Our failure to manage any of these risks successfully could harm our future international operations and our overall business, and results of our operations.
Risks Related to the Restaurant Industry
Food safety and food-borne illness concerns and any related unfavorable publicity could have an adverse effect on our business.
We dedicate substantial resources to ensuring our guests enjoy safe, quality food products. Nonetheless, restaurant businesses such as ours can be adversely affected by publicity resulting from complaints or litigation regarding poor food quality, food-borne illness, personal injury, food tampering, communicable disease, adverse health effects of consumption of various food products or high-calorie foods, or other concerns. Food safety issues also could be caused by food suppliers or distributors and, as a result, could be out of our control. Regardless of the source or cause, any report of food-borne illnesses such as E. coli, norovirus, listeria, hepatitis A, salmonella, or trichinosis, and other food safety issues including food tampering or contamination, at one of our or a franchisee’s restaurants, could adversely affect our reputation and have a negative impact on our sales. The occurrence of food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, resulting in higher costs and lower margins.
Health concerns relating to the consumption of beef, chicken, or other food products could affect consumer preferences and could negatively affect our results of operations.
Consumer preferences could be affected by health concerns about food-related illness, the consumption of beef, which is the key ingredient in many of our menu items, or negative publicity or publication of government or industry findings concerning food quality, illness, and injury. Further, consumers may react negatively to reports concerning our food products or health or other concerns or operating issues stemming from one or more of our restaurants. Such negative publicity, whether or not valid, may negatively affect demand for our food and could result in decreased guest traffic to our restaurants. A decrease in guest traffic to our restaurants as a result of these health concerns or negative publicity or as a result of a change in our menu or concept could materially harm our business and negatively affect our profitability.
Our business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs, including costs related to the increase in minimum wage and new heath care laws.
Labor is a primary component in the cost of operating our business. Increased labor costs, whether due to competition, unionization, increased minimum and tip wage, state unemployment rates, employee benefits costs, or otherwise, may adversely impact our operating expenses. A considerable amount of our restaurant team members are paid at rates related to the federal, state, or local minimum wage. Further, we have a substantial number of restaurants located in states or municipalities where the minimum wage is greater than the federal minimum wage, including California, Washington, and New York. For example, California enacted legislation that increased its minimum wage from $10 an hour to $10.50 an hour effective January 2017 for businesses with 26 or more employees, and which then increase each year until reaching $15 per hour in 2022. We anticipate additional legislation increasing minimum wage standards will be enacted in future periods and in other jurisdictions. In the past, many of our eligible team members chose not to participate in our Company sponsored health care plans for various reasons but we expect to continue to see increased costs due to the impact of changes in the health care laws, including as a result of any repeal, replacement or other significant modifications of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the "PPACA"). Our distributors and suppliers also may be affected by higher minimum wage or health care costs, which could result in higher costs for goods and services supplied to us. In addition, a shortage in the labor pool or other general inflationary pressures or changes could also increase our labor costs. In the past, we have been able to offset increases in labor costs by improving our productivity or changing staffing models in our restaurants or taking gradual increases in pricing but there is no guarantee that we can continue to do so in the future. If our labor costs increase and we are not able to offset costs through productivity or efficiency gains from changing staffing models, or to pass along the costs in the form of increased prices to our guests, then it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Further, if we change staffing models in our restaurants due to labor costs or any labor shortages, it could negatively impact our ability to provide adequate service levels to our guests, which could result in adverse guest reactions and a possible reduction in guest traffic at our restaurants.
17
Labor organizing could adversely affect our operations and harm our competitive position in the restaurant industry, which could harm our financial performance.
Our employees or others may attempt to unionize our workforce, establish boycotts or picket lines or interrupt our supply chains which could increase our labor costs, limit our ability to manage our workforce effectively, and cause disruptions to our operations. A loss of our ability to effectively manage our workforce and the compensation and benefits we offer to our staff members could harm our financial performance.
Our failure to remain in compliance with governmental laws and regulations as they continually evolve, and the associated costs of compliance, could cause our business results to suffer.
Our business is subject to various federal, state, and local government laws and regulations, including, among others, those relating to our employees, public health and safety, food safety, nutritional disclosure, alcoholic beverage control, public accommodations, and financial and disclosure reporting and controls. These laws and regulations continually evolve and change. We may fail to maintain compliance with all laws and regulations despite our best efforts. Changes in applicable laws and regulatory requirements, or failure to comply with them could result in, among other things, increased exposure to litigation, administrative enforcement actions or governmental investigations or proceedings; revocation of required licenses or approvals; fines; and civil and criminal liability. These negative consequences could increase the cost of or interfere with our ability to operate our business and execute our strategies.
Various federal, state, and local employment laws govern our relationship with our team members and affect operating costs. These laws govern employee classification, wage rates and payment requirements including tip credit laws and overtime pay, meal and rest breaks, unemployment and other taxes, health care and benefits, workers’ compensation rates, citizenship or residency requirements, labor relations, child labor regulations, and discriminatory conduct. Changes in these laws or our failure to comply with enforcement requirements could require changes to our operations that could harm our operating results. For example, although we require all of our team members to provide us with the government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our team members, without our knowledge, may not meet federal citizenship or residency requirements, which could lead to a disruption in our work force. A number of other factors could adversely affect our operating results, including:
|
•
|
additional government imposed increases in minimum and/or tipped wages, overtime pay, paid leaves of absence, sick leave, and mandated health benefits;
|
|
•
|
increased tax reporting and tax payment requirements for employees who receive gratuities;
|
|
•
|
a reduction in the number of states that allow gratuities to be credited toward minimum wage requirements; and
|
|
•
|
increased employee litigation including claims under federal and/or state wage and hour laws.
|
We are subject to “dram shop” statutes in some states. These statutes generally allow a person injured by an intoxicated person to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such intoxicated person. Failure to comply with alcoholic beverage control or dram shop regulations could subject the Company to liability and could negatively affect our business.
A significant increase in litigation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business prospects.
As a member of the restaurant industry, we are sometimes the subject of complaints or litigation, including class action lawsuits, from guests alleging illness, injury, or other food quality, health, or operational concerns. Negative publicity resulting from these allegations could harm our restaurants, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are liable. In fact, we are subject to the same risks of negative publicity resulting from these sorts of allegations even if the claim actually involves one of our franchisees.
In addition, any failure by us to comply with the various federal and state labor laws governing our relationship with our team members including requirements pertaining to minimum wage, overtime pay, meal and rest breaks, unemployment tax rates, workers’ compensation rates, citizenship or residency requirements, child labor regulations, and discriminatory conduct, may have a material adverse effect on our business or operations. We have been subject to such claims from time to time. The possibility of a material adverse effect on our business relating to employment litigation is even more pronounced given the high concentration of team members employed in the western United States, as this region, and California in particular, has a substantial amount of legislative and judicial activity pertaining to employment-related issues. Further, employee claims against us based on, among other things, discrimination, harassment, or wrongful termination may divert our financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit the future performance of our operations.
18
None.
We currently lease the real estate for most of our Company-owned restaurant facilities under operating leases with remaining terms ranging from less than one year to over 15 years excluding options to extend. These leases generally contain options which permit us to extend the lease term at an agreed rent or at prevailing market rates. Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are determined as a percentage of adjusted gross restaurant sales in excess of specified levels. We record a contingent rent liability and the corresponding rent expense when specified levels have been achieved or when management determines that achieving the specified levels during the year is probable. Certain lease agreements also require the Company to pay maintenance, insurance, and property tax costs.
We own real estate for 36 Company-owned restaurants located in Arizona (4); Arkansas (1); California (1); Colorado (3); Florida (1); Georgia (1); Illinois (1); Indiana (1); Maryland (1); Missouri (1); North Carolina (3); Ohio (4); Pennsylvania (3); Texas (5); Virginia (4); and Washington (2).
Our corporate headquarters is located in Greenwood Village, Colorado. We occupy this facility under a lease that expires on May 31, 2025. We operate a test kitchen and training facility in located in Englewood, Colorado under a lease that expires December 31, 2022.
Our current prototype for new Red Robin restaurants is approximately 4,500 to 5,800 square feet with a capacity of approximately 145 to 200 seats. We develop restaurants under ground leases on which we build our own restaurant in addition to using in-line, end cap, and mall locations. As of
December 31, 2017
, our restaurant locations comprised approximately
3 million
square feet.
In the normal course of business, there are various claims in process, matters in litigation, and other contingencies. These include employment related claims and claims from guests or team members alleging illness, injury, food quality, health, or operational concerns. To date, no claims of these types of litigation, certain of which are covered by insurance policies, have had a material effect on the Company. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these suits, legal proceedings, and claims with certainty, management is of the opinion that adequate provision for potential losses associated with these matters has been made in the financial statements and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
Not applicable.
19
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol RRGB. The table below sets forth the high and low per share sales prices for our common stock as reported by The NASDAQ Global Select Market for the indicated periods (based on our fiscal quarters).
|
|
Sales Price
|
|||||||
|
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
|
2017
|
|
|||||||
|
4th Quarter
|
$
|
70.10
|
|
$
|
45.70
|
|
||
|
3rd Quarter
|
67.20
|
|
53.25
|
|
||||
|
2nd Quarter
|
74.11
|
|
57.00
|
|
||||
|
1st Quarter
|
59.30
|
|
45.20
|
|
||||
|
2016
|
|
|||||||
|
4th Quarter
|
$
|
58.65
|
|
$
|
40.85
|
|
||
|
3rd Quarter
|
54.87
|
|
44.08
|
|
||||
|
2nd Quarter
|
67.05
|
|
46.70
|
|
||||
|
1st Quarter
|
68.97
|
|
55.79
|
|
||||
As of
February 26, 2018
, there were 108 registered owners of our common stock.
Dividends
We did not declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock during
2017
and
2016
. We currently anticipate that we will retain any future cash flow to fund our operations and expansion of our business or to to pay down debt. In addition, our credit agreement may limit us from declaring or paying any dividends or making any other repurchases on any of our shares under certain circumstances, and are subject to the leverage ratio under our credit agreement.
Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then existing conditions including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2017
, the Company did not have any sales of securities in transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act that have not been reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K. The Company did not purchase any of its common stock during the fourth quarter of
2017
.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the yearly percentage in cumulative total stockholders’ return on Common Stock of the Company since December 28, 2012, with the cumulative total return over the same period for (i) the Russell 3000 Index, and (ii) the S&P 600 Restaurants Index.
Pursuant to rules of the SEC, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 28, 2012, the last trading day in the Company
’
s 2012 fiscal year, in the Company
’
s Common Stock and in each of the indices.
This performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
20
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., The Russell 3000 Index
and S&P 600 Restaurants Index
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
December 28, 2012
|
December 29, 2013
|
December 28, 2014
|
December 27, 2015
|
December 25, 2016
|
December 31, 2017
|
||||||||||||
|
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
223.40
|
|
227.04
|
|
183.72
|
|
167.71
|
|
167.56
|
|
|||||
|
Russell 3000
|
100.00
|
|
134.51
|
|
153.17
|
|
152.36
|
|
171.04
|
|
203.85
|
|
||||||
|
S&P 600 Restaurants
|
100.00
|
|
163.95
|
|
205.81
|
|
197.30
|
|
234.28
|
|
243.20
|
|
||||||
___________________________________
|
*
|
$100 invested on December 28, 2012 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends based on calendar years ending December 31 for purposes of comparability.
|
21
The table below contains selected consolidated financial and operating data. The statement of income, cash flow, and balance sheet data for each fiscal year has been derived from our consolidated financial statements. You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 25, 2016
|
December 27, 2015
|
December 28, 2014
|
December 29, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
(53 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Restaurant revenue
|
$
|
1,365,060
|
|
$
|
1,280,669
|
|
$
|
1,238,898
|
|
$
|
1,129,135
|
|
$
|
1,000,198
|
|
|||||
|
Total revenues
|
1,380,929
|
|
1,296,441
|
|
1,257,592
|
|
1,146,102
|
|
1,017,247
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total costs and expenses
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
|
1,341,897
|
|
1,284,871
|
|
1,190,547
|
|
1,101,418
|
|
973,433
|
|
||||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
39,032
|
|
11,570
|
|
67,045
|
|
44,684
|
|
43,814
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net income
|
30,019
|
|
11,725
|
|
47,704
|
|
32,561
|
|
32,239
|
|
||||||||||
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
$
|
2.27
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|||||
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
12,899
|
|
13,332
|
|
14,042
|
|
14,237
|
|
14,225
|
|
||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
12,998
|
|
13,462
|
|
14,216
|
|
14,447
|
|
14,510
|
|
||||||||||
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
17,714
|
|
$
|
11,732
|
|
$
|
22,705
|
|
$
|
22,408
|
|
$
|
17,108
|
|
|||||
|
Total assets
|
910,615
|
|
918,545
|
|
839,979
|
|
735,889
|
|
634,645
|
|
||||||||||
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
277,313
|
|
347,838
|
|
210,847
|
|
147,896
|
|
88,714
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
387,435
|
|
348,053
|
|
374,311
|
|
359,771
|
|
347,403
|
|
||||||||||
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
156,607
|
|
$
|
98,957
|
|
$
|
140,923
|
|
$
|
123,581
|
|
$
|
113,529
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(83,290
|
)
|
(199,379
|
)
|
(169,111
|
)
|
(155,278
|
)
|
(78,231
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(67,924
|
)
|
89,333
|
|
28,767
|
|
37,051
|
|
(40,630
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net sales per square foot in Company-owned restaurants
|
$
|
461
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
$
|
466
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|||||
|
Total operating weeks
(6)
|
25,038
|
|
23,799
|
|
22,006
|
|
20,070
|
|
18,012
|
|
||||||||||
|
Company-owned restaurants open at end of period
|
480
|
|
465
|
|
439
|
|
415
|
|
361
|
|
||||||||||
|
Franchised restaurants open at end of period
|
86
|
|
86
|
|
99
|
|
99
|
|
134
|
|
||||||||||
|
Comparable restaurant net sales increase (decrease)
(7)(8)
|
0.7
|
%
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
2.1
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
4.0
|
%
|
||||||||||
___________________________________
|
(1)
|
2017 includes pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges of
$6.9 million
related to the impairment of
13
restaurants.
|
|
(2)
|
2016 includes pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges of
$24.4 million
related to the impairment of
19
restaurants,
$2.5 million
related to software impairment, and
$0.8 million
related to the relocation of a restaurant. 2016 also includes pre-tax costs of
$6.7 million
related to the closure of
nine
Red Robin Burger Works restaurants and
$0.7 million
related to acquiring 13 franchised restaurants.
|
22
|
(3)
|
2015 includes pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges of
$0.6 million
related to the impairment of
two
restaurants.
|
|
(4)
|
2014 includes pre-tax costs of $1.8 million related to acquiring 36 franchised restaurants. 2014 also includes a pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charge of $8.8 million, of which $7.6 million related to the impairment of in-development software, and $1.2 million related to the impairment of three restaurants.
|
|
(5)
|
2013 includes pre-tax non-cash asset impairment charges of $1.5 million related to the impairment of four restaurants.
|
|
(6)
|
Total operating weeks represent the number of weeks that the Company-owned restaurants were open during the reporting period.
|
|
(7)
|
Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Revenues” for a further discussion of our comparable restaurant designation.
|
|
(8)
|
Comparable restaurant sales increase and average annual comparable restaurant sales volumes for 2017 were calculated on a 53-week basis by adjusting fiscal year 2016 as if there were 53 weeks.
|
Overview
Description of the Business
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries (“Red Robin,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”), primarily develops, operates, and franchises full-service restaurants with
566
locations in North America. As of
December 31, 2017
, the Company’s fiscal year end, we operated
480
Company-owned restaurants located in
39
s
tates and two Canadian provinces. The Company also had
86
casual-dining restaurants operated by franchisees in 15 states as of
December 31, 2017
.
The Company operates its business as one operating and one reportable segment.
Our primary source of revenue is from the sale of food and beverages at Company-owned restaurants. We also earn revenue from royalties and fees from franchised restaurants.
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Sunday of each calendar year. Most of our fiscal years have 52 weeks; however, we experience a fifty-third week once every five or six years. Our discussion for fiscal year
2017
, which ended on
December 31, 2017
, refers to a 53-week period with the fifty-third week occurring in the fourth quarter. Our discussion for fiscal years
2016
and
2015
, which ended
December 25, 2016
and
December 27, 2015
, refers to a 52-week period in each year. In fiscal year 2017, the fifty-third week comprised
$29.8 million
of restaurant revenue and approximately
$4.1 million
of net income.
Financial and Operational Highlights
The following summarizes the financial and operational highlights of
2017
and our 2018 outlook:
|
•
|
Financial Performance.
|
|
◦
|
Restaurant revenue increased
$84.4 million
, or
6.6%
, to
$1.4 billion
for the 53 weeks ended
December 31, 2017
as compared to
$1.3 billion
for the 52 weeks ended
December 25, 2016
. The fifty-third week in 2017 contributed
$29.8 million
in restaurant revenue. The remaining increase was primarily due to a
$57.0 million
increase in revenue from newly opened restaurants and a
$8.1 million
, or
0.7%
, increase in comparable restaurant revenue, which included a
$0.8 million
, or
0.1%
, favorable foreign currency impact related to our Canadian restaurants; and partially offset by a
$10.5 million
decrease from closed restaurants. In 2018, t
he Company expects comparable restaurant sales growth of 50 to 150 basis points, and operating weeks to decline 1%, as a result of having only 52 weeks in 2018 compared to 53 weeks in 2017, offset by the impact of new unit growth in 2017 and 2018. As a result, 2018 total revenue is projected between a decline of 50 basis points and an increase of 50 basis points.
|
|
◦
|
Restaurant operating costs, as a percentage of restaurant revenue, increased 50 basis points to
79.6%
in
2017
compared to
79.1%
in
2016
. The increase was primarily due to higher labor costs and food and beverage costs, as a percentage of restaurant revenue, and was partially offset by a reduction in occupancy costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue.
|
|
◦
|
Net income increased to
$30.0 million
in
2017
from
$11.7 million
in
2016
. The fifty-third week in 2017 contributed approximately
$4.1 million
to net income. Diluted earnings per share increased to
$2.31
as compared to
$0.87
in fiscal year
2016
. Excluding the impact of $0.40 per diluted share related to asset
|
23
impairment, which was partially offset by a benefit of $0.22 per diluted share related to deferred tax liability remeasurement due to tax reform, net income per diluted share in 2017 was $2.49. Excluding the impact of a $1.65 per diluted share related to asset impairment and restaurant closure costs, $0.20 per diluted share related to litigation contingencies, and $0.06 per diluted share related to reorganization costs, net income per diluted share in
2016
was $2.78.
|
•
|
Marketing.
Our Red Robin Royalty™ loyalty program operates in all of our U.S. and Canada Company-owned Red Robin restaurants and has been rolled out to most of our franchised restaurants. We engage our guests through Red Robin Royalty with offers designed to increase frequency of visits as a key part of our overall marketing strategy. We also inform enrolled guests early about new menu items to generate awareness and trial. Our media buying approach is concentrated on generating significant reach and frequency while on-air. In addition, we use digital, social, and earned media to target and more effectively reach specific segments of our guest base.
|
|
•
|
Restaurant Development.
During
2017
, we opened
18
Company-owned Red Robin restaurants, including one restaurant that was temporarily closed during 2016, and relocated
one
Red Robin restaurant. In 2018, we plan to open approximately nine new Company-owned Red Robin restaurants.
|
Restaurant Data
The following table details data pertaining to the number of Company-owned and franchised restaurants for the fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015.
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||
|
Company-owned:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Beginning of period
|
465
|
|
439
|
|
415
|
|
|||
|
Opened during the period
|
18
|
|
26
|
|
24
|
|
|||
|
Acquired from franchisee
|
—
|
|
13
|
|
1
|
|
|||
|
Closed during the period
|
(3
|
)
|
(13
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|||
|
End of period
|
480
|
|
465
|
|
439
|
|
|||
|
Franchised:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Beginning of period
|
86
|
|
99
|
|
99
|
|
|||
|
Opened during the period
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|||
|
Sold or closed during the period
|
(1
|
)
|
(13
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|||
|
End of period
|
86
|
|
86
|
|
99
|
|
|||
|
Total number of restaurants
|
566
|
|
551
|
|
538
|
|
|||
24
Results of Operations
Operating results for each fiscal year presented below are expressed as a percentage of total revenues, except for the components of restaurant operating costs, which are expressed as a percentage of restaurant revenues:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||
|
|
(53 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
(52 Weeks)
|
||||||
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Restaurant
|
98.9
|
%
|
98.8
|
%
|
98.5
|
%
|
|||
|
Franchise royalties and fees
|
0.8
|
|
0.9
|
|
1.0
|
|
|||
|
Other revenue
|
0.3
|
|
0.3
|
|
0.5
|
|
|||
|
Total revenues
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Restaurant operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below):
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
23.5
|
|
23.3
|
|
24.6
|
|
|||
|
Labor
|
34.8
|
|
34.3
|
|
32.6
|
|
|||
|
Other operating
|
13.1
|
|
13.1
|
|
12.2
|
|
|||
|
Occupancy
|
8.3
|
|
8.4
|
|
8.1
|
|
|||
|
Total restaurant operating costs
|
79.6
|
|
79.1
|
|
77.4
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
6.7
|
|
6.7
|
|
6.2
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
10.9
|
|
10.6
|
|
11.7
|
|
|||
|
Pre-opening and acquisition costs
|
0.4
|
|
0.6
|
|
0.6
|
|
|||
|
Other charges
|
0.5
|
|
3.1
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Income from operations
|
2.8
|
|
0.9
|
|
5.3
|
|
|||
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
0.8
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.3
|
|
|||
|
Interest income and other, net
|
(0.1
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total other expenses
|
0.7
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.3
|
|
|||
|
Income before income taxes
|
2.1
|
|
0.4
|
|
5.0
|
|
|||
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
(0.1
|
)
|
(0.5
|
)
|
1.2
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
2.2
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
3.8
|
%
|
|||
___________________________________
Certain percentage amounts in the table above do not total due to rounding as well as the fact that restaurant operating costs are expressed as a percentage of restaurant revenues and not total revenues.
25
Revenues
|
(Revenues in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Restaurant revenue
|
$
|
1,365,060
|
|
$
|
1,280,669
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
$
|
1,238,898
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|||||
|
Franchise royalties and fees
|
11,044
|
|
11,209
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
12,526
|
|
(10.5
|
)%
|
||||||||
|
Other revenue
|
4,825
|
|
4,563
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
6,168
|
|
(26.0
|
)%
|
||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
1,380,929
|
|
$
|
1,296,441
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
$
|
1,257,592
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|||||
|
Average weekly net sales volumes in Company-owned restaurants
(1)
|
$
|
54,520
|
|
$
|
53,848
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
$
|
56,261
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Total operating weeks
|
25,038
|
|
23,799
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
22,006
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Net sales per square foot
|
$
|
461
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
$
|
466
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|||||
___________________________________
|
(1)
|
Calculated using constant currency rates. Using historical currency rates, the average weekly sales per unit for fiscal years 2016 and 2015 for Company-owned restaurants was $53,812 and $56,298. The Company calculates non-GAAP constant currency average weekly sales per unit by translating prior year local currency average weekly sales per unit to U.S. dollars based on current quarter average exchange rates. The Company considers non-GAAP constant currency average weekly sales per unit to be a useful metric to investors and management as they facilitate a more useful comparison of current performance to historical performance.
|
Restaurant revenue, which comprises almost entirely food and beverage sales, increased by
$84.4 million
, or
6.6%
, for the 53 weeks ended
December 31, 2017
as compared to the 52 weeks in
2016
. The fifty-third week in 2017 contributed approximately
$29.8 million
in restaurant revenue. The remaining increase was primarily due to a
$57.0 million
increase in revenue from newly opened restaurants and a
$8.1 million
, or
0.7%
, increase in comparable restaurant revenue, partially offset by a
$10.5 million
decrease from closed restaurants. The comparable restaurant revenue increase was driven by a 0.4% increase in guest counts, a 0.2% increase in average guest check, and a
0.1%
favorable foreign exchange impact related to our Canadian restaurants. The increase in average guest check resulted from a 1.9% increase in pricing offset by a 1.7% decrease in menu mix.
Restaurant revenue increased by $41.8 million, or 3.4%, for the 52 weeks ended
December 25, 2016
as compared to the 52 weeks in 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $86.9 million increase in revenue from newly opened and acquired restaurants, partially offset by a $38.9 million, or 3.3% decrease in comparable restaurant revenue, $4.5 million from closed restaurants, and a $1.7 million unfavorable foreign exchange impact related to our Canadian restaurants. The comparable restaurant revenue decrease was driven by a 3.4% decrease in guest counts and a 0.1% unfavorable foreign exchange impact related to our Canadian restaurants, partially offset by a 0.2% increase in average guest check. The increase in average guest check resulted from a 1.3% increase in pricing offset by a 1.1% decrease in menu mix.
Average weekly sales volumes represent the total restaurant revenue for all Company-owned Red Robin casual dining restaurants for each time period presented, divided by the number of operating weeks in the period. Comparable restaurant revenues include those restaurants that are in the comparable base at the end of each period presented. New restaurants are restaurants that are open but by definition not included in the comparable category because they have not operated for five full quarters. Fluctuations in average weekly net sales volumes for Company-owned restaurants reflect the effect of comparable restaurant revenue changes as well as the performance of new and acquired restaurants during the period and the average square footage of our restaurants.
Franchise royalties and fees comprise primarily royalty income and initial franchise fees. Franchise royalties and fees decreased
$0.2 million
, or
1.5%
, from
2016
, primarily related to the loss of royalties from 13 franchised restaurants that we acquired in 2016. The decrease was partially offset by the fifty-third week in 2017 which contributed $0.2 million in franchise royalties. Our franchisees reported that comparable restaurant revenue decreased
1.6%
in 2017 as compared to 2016. The decrease in franchise royalties and fees in 2016 from 2015 is primarily related to the loss of royalties from 14 franchised restaurants that we acquired in 2015 and 2016. Our franchisees reported that comparable restaurant revenue decreased 2.0% in 2016 as compared to 2015.
Other revenue comprises primarily gift card breakage and licensing royalties. For the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
, we recognized
$4.0 million
,
$3.5 million
, and
$5.1 million
of gift card breakage. Gift card breakage revenue in 2015 was higher due to a change in accounting estimate for gift card breakage.
26
Cost of Sales
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
$
|
320,355
|
|
$
|
298,249
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
$
|
304,637
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|||||
|
As a percent of restaurant revenue
|
23.5
|
%
|
23.3
|
%
|
0.2
|
%
|
24.6
|
%
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
||||||||
Cost of sales, which comprises food and beverage costs, is variable and generally fluctuates with sales volume. Cost of sales as a percentage of restaurant revenue increased
20
basis points in
2017
compared to
2016
. The increase was primarily driven by higher prices for ground beef, potatoes, and seafood, partially offset by lower poultry prices.
Cost of sales as a percentage of restaurant revenue decreased 130 basis points in 2016 compared to 2015. The decrease was mainly driven by food cost deflation, primarily related to ground beef, along with favorable menu mix and pricing.
Labor
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Labor
|
$
|
475,432
|
|
$
|
439,232
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
$
|
403,517
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|||||
|
As a percent of restaurant revenue
|
34.8
|
%
|
34.3
|
%
|
0.5
|
%
|
32.6
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
||||||||
Labor costs include restaurant-level hourly wages and management salaries as well as related taxes and benefits. In
2017
, labor as a percentage of restaurant revenue increased
50
basis points compared to 2016. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in management bonus and increases in the minimum wages in certain states, partially offset by a decrease in insurance and training costs.
In 2016, labor as a percentage of restaurant revenue increased 170 basis points compared to 2015. This increase was primarily driven by increases in the minimum wages in certain states, higher manager salaries due to sales deleverage, and an increase in health insurance costs, partially offset by a decrease in management bonus.
Other Operating
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Other operating
|
$
|
178,309
|
|
$
|
167,727
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
$
|
150,767
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|||||
|
As a percent of restaurant revenue
|
13.1
|
%
|
13.1
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
12.2
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
||||||||
Other operating costs include costs such as equipment repairs and maintenance costs, restaurant supplies, utilities, restaurant technology, and other miscellaneous costs. During
2017
, other operating costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue were flat compared to the prior year, as higher costs of third-party delivery fees and restaurant technology were offset by lower costs for equipment repairs and maintenance and utilities.
During 2016, other operating costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue increased 90 basis points over the prior year, primarily due to higher costs of equipment repairs and maintenance, restaurant technology, and credit card fees.
Occupancy
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Occupancy
|
$
|
112,753
|
|
$
|
107,408
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
$
|
100,007
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|||||
|
As a percent of restaurant revenue
|
8.3
|
%
|
8.4
|
%
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
8.1
|
%
|
0.3
|
%
|
||||||||
Occupancy costs include fixed rents, property taxes, common area maintenance charges, general liability insurance, contingent rents, and other property costs. Occupancy costs incurred prior to opening our new restaurants are included in pre-opening costs. In
2017
, occupancy costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue decreased
10
basis points compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to sales leverage, partially offset by an increase in general liability insurance. Our fixed rents for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
were
$76.1 million
and
$71.9 million
, an increase of
$4.2 million
due to
41
locations opened and acquired since the beginning of 2016.
In 2016, occupancy costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue increased 30 basis points over the prior year, primarily
27
due to sales deleverage. Our fixed rents for the fiscal years ended
December 25, 2016
and
December 27, 2015
were
$71.9 million
and
$65.5 million
, an increase of $6.4 million due to 39 locations opened and acquired since 2015.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
92,545
|
|
$
|
86,695
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
$
|
77,374
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|||||
|
As a percent of total revenues
|
6.7
|
%
|
6.7
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
6.2
|
%
|
0.5
|
%
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on capital expenditures for restaurants and corporate assets as well as amortization of acquired franchise rights, leasehold interests, and certain liquor licenses. In
2017
, depreciation and amortization increased
$5.9 million
, or
6.7%
, compared to 2016, primarily related to new restaurants opened and acquired since 2016 and restaurants remodeled under our brand transformation initiative since 2016. We project our depreciation and amortization expense to be approximately $95 million in 2018.
In 2016, depreciation and amortization increased $9.3 million, or 12.0%, compared to 2015, primarily related to new restaurants opened and acquired since 2015, restaurants remodeled under our brand transformation initiative since 2015, and accelerated depreciation of certain software and restaurant assets.
Selling, General, and Administrative
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
$
|
150,019
|
|
$
|
137,887
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
$
|
146,656
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|||||
|
As a percent of total revenues
|
10.9
|
%
|
10.6
|
%
|
0.3
|
%
|
11.7
|
%
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative costs include all corporate and administrative functions. Components of this category include marketing and advertising costs; corporate, regional, and franchise support salaries and benefits; travel; professional and consulting fees; corporate information systems; legal expenses; office rent; training; and board of directors’ expenses.
Selling, general, and administrative costs in
2017
increased
$12.1 million
, or
8.8%
, as compared to
2016
. The increase was primarily due to an increase in advertising, incentive compensation, gift card costs, and information technology project costs, partially offset by lower salaries and benefits, professional services costs, and travel costs.
Selling, general, and administrative costs in 2016 decreased $8.8 million, or 6.0%, as compared to 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in incentive compensation, travel and entertainment, and professional services costs, partially offset by higher salaries.
Pre-opening and Acquisition Costs
|
(In thousands, except percentages and restaurant openings)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017 - 2016 Percent Change
|
2015
|
2016 - 2015 Percent Change
|
|||||||||||||
|
Pre-opening and acquisition costs
(1)
|
$
|
5,570
|
|
$
|
8,025
|
|
(30.6
|
)%
|
$
|
7,008
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|||||
|
As a percent of total revenues
|
0.4
|
%
|
0.6
|
%
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
0.6
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Number of restaurants opened during year
|
18
|
|
26
|
|
(30.8
|
)%
|
24
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
||||||||
|
Average per restaurant pre-opening costs
|
$
|
309
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
$
|
292
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|||||
___________________________________
|
(1)
|
Acquisition costs in 2016 related to the acquisition of 13 Red Robin franchised restaurants in the United States totaled
$0.7 million
.
|
Pre-opening costs, which are expensed as incurred, consist of the costs of labor, hiring, and training the initial work force for our new restaurants; occupancy costs incurred prior to opening; travel expenses for our training teams; supply costs; the cost of food and beverages used in training; licenses and marketing; and other direct costs related to the opening of new restaurants. Average per restaurant pre-opening costs represents total costs incurred for those restaurants that opened for business during the periods presented.
Pre-opening costs are estimated to be approximately $3 million in 2018 due to the reduced number of new restaurant openings.
28
Other Charges
During
2017
, we determined that
13
Company-owned restaurants were impaired. We recognized a non-cash impairment charge of
$6.9 million
as a result of the current and projected future results of these restaurants. During
2016
, we determined that
19
Company-owned restaurants were impaired and recognized a non-cash impairment charge of
$24.4 million
. During 2015, we determined that
two
Company-owned restaurants were impaired and recognized a non-cash impairment charge of
$0.6 million
. The Company reviewed each restaurant’s past and present operating performance combined with projected future results, primarily through projected undiscounted cash flows, which indicated impairment. The carrying amount of each restaurant was compared to its estimated fair value as determined by management. The impairment charge represents the excess of each restaurant’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. The fair value measurement for asset impairment is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a level 3 fair value measurement.
The Company also recognized a
$0.8 million
asset impairment charge due to the relocation of a restaurant during 2016.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company determined certain software related to its Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system would be obsolete upon migration to a cloud-based ERP system in 2017. The Company also determined certain software in development for supply chain management would not meet the Company’s requirements if it were implemented. As a result, the Company recorded a
$2.5 million
impairment charge to write down the capitalized costs associated with this software.
During 2016, the Company closed
nine
Red Robin Burger Works restaurants, a smaller non-traditional prototype with a limited menu and limited service, that were underperforming relative to Company expectations and recognized
$6.7 million
of restaurant closure costs. Refer to Note 3,
Other Charges
.
Interest Expense
Interest expense in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
was
$11.0 million
,
$7.2 million
, and
$3.7 million
. Interest expense increased in
2017
primarily due to increased interest rates on our revolving line. Our weighted average interest rate was
3.7%
and
2.4%
in 2017 and
2016
. Interest expense increased in 2016 due to a higher average debt balance partially offset by a lower weighted average interest rate of
2.4%
versus
2.6%
in 2015.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
The benefit from income taxes was
$1.0 million
in
2017
compared to a benefit from income taxes of
$6.9 million
in
2016
and a provision for income taxes of
$15.5 million
in 2015. Our effective income tax rate was
3.5%
benefit in 2017,
144.9%
benefit in 2016, and
24.6%
expense in 2015. The change in our 2017 effective tax rate compared to 2016 is primarily attributable to the increase in earnings before income tax, partially offset by an increase in the FICA tip tax credit. In addition, the December 22, 2017 enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act required a remeasurement of our net deferred tax liabilities which provided a one-time tax benefit of
$2.8 million
. The decrease in our 2016 effective tax rate compared to 2015 was primarily attributable to a decrease in earnings before income tax as well as an increase in the FICA tip tax credit. The 2018 annual tax rate is projected to be between 0% and 5%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Cash and cash equivalents increased
$6.0 million
to
$17.7 million
at
December 31, 2017
, from
$11.7 million
at
December 25, 2016
. This increase in our cash position was primarily the net result of:
|
•
|
$156.6 million
of cash provided by operating activities;
|
|
•
|
$83.5 million
used for the construction of new restaurants, expenditures for facility improvements, and investments in information technology;
|
|
•
|
$70.7 million
in net repayments on our credit facility and payments on capital leases; and
|
|
•
|
$3.4 million
in proceeds from stock option exercises and purchases of common stock through the employee stock purchase plan.
|
We expect to continue to reinvest available cash flows from operations to develop new restaurants or invest in existing restaurants and infrastructure; pay down debt; and execute our long-term strategic initiatives.
29
We intend to reinvest earnings from our restaurants in our Canadian subsidiaries for the foreseeable future. We have not, nor do we anticipate the need to, repatriate funds to the U.S. to satisfy domestic liquidity needs and, accordingly, we do not provide for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding tax on these earnings.
Cash Flows
The table below summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities for each of the past three fiscal years (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
156,607
|
|
$
|
98,957
|
|
$
|
140,923
|
|
|||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(83,290
|
)
|
(199,379
|
)
|
(169,111
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(67,924
|
)
|
89,333
|
|
28,767
|
|
||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
589
|
|
116
|
|
(282
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
5,982
|
|
$
|
(10,973
|
)
|
$
|
297
|
|
|||
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities increased
$57.7 million
to
$156.6 million
in
2017
. The increase was primarily driven by a
$44.0 million
decrease related to timing of vendor payments due to a system conversion at the end of 2016, a
$9.7 million
increase in cash generated from restaurant operations, a
$3.6 million
decrease in corporate salaries and benefits, and a
$0.7 million
decrease in income tax payments.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $41.9 million to $99.0 million in 2016 as compared to $140.9 million in 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by $24.0 million in additional payments to vendors, a $15.4 million decrease in cash generated from restaurant operations, a $4.7 million increase in team member salaries and benefits, a $3.0 million increase in interest payments, $2.7 million paid for restaurant closure costs, and a $1.8 million increase in compensation payments related to prior year’s bonus payout, partially offset by a $9.7 million decrease in income tax payments.
Investing Cash Flows
Net cash flows used in investing activities decreased
$116.1 million
from
$199.4 million
in
2016
to
$83.3 million
in
2017
. The decrease was primarily due to the acquisition of franchised restaurants in 2016, along with decreased investment in restaurant remodels and new restaurant openings in 2017. The following table lists the components of our capital expenditures, net of currency translation effect, for
2017
(in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
||
|
New restaurants
|
$
|
38,445
|
|
|
Restaurant maintenance capital
|
20,257
|
|
|
|
Investment in technology infrastructure and other
|
19,972
|
|
|
|
Restaurant remodels
|
4,857
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
$
|
83,531
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities increased $30.3 million from
$169.1 million
in 2015 to
$199.4 million
in 2016. The increase over prior year was primarily due to the acquisition of franchised restaurants and increased investment in new restaurant openings, partially offset by decreased investments in restaurant remodels.
In 2018, capital expenditures are expected to be between $65 million and $75 million.
Financing Cash Flows
Cash used in our financing activities increased
$157.3 million
to
$67.9 million
in
2017
. This increase primarily resulted from
$203.5 million
in reduced borrowings and additional repayments made on long-term debt, partially offset by a
$46.1 million
decrease in cash used to repurchase the Company’s common stock.
Cash provided by our financing activities increased $60.6 million to $89.3 million in 2016. This increase was primarily due to a $69.9 million increase in net debt borrowings, partially offset by a $6.1 million increase in cash used to repurchase the
30
Company’s common stock, a $2.5 million decrease in net cash proceeds received from exercise of employee stock options and purchase plan and tax benefit from exercise of stock options, and a $0.7 million increase in debt issuance costs.
Credit Facility.
On
June 30, 2016
, we replaced the credit facility that we entered into in 2014 with a new credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) with the same group of lenders. The New Credit Facility provides for a
$400 million
revolving line of credit with a sublimit for the issuance of up to
$25 million
in letters of credit and swingline loans up to
$15 million
, and includes an option to increase the amount available under the credit facility up to an additional
$100 million
in the aggregate, subject to the lenders’ participation.
The New Credit Facility also provides a Canadian Dollar borrowing sublimit equivalent to
$20 million
. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility, if denominated in U.S. Dollars, are subject to rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a spread based on leverage or a base rate plus a spread based on leverage (base rate is the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus
0.50%
, and (c) LIBOR for an Interest Period of one month plus
1%
). Borrowings under the New Credit Facility, if denominated in Canadian Dollars, are subject to rates based on LIBOR plus a spread based on leverage or a base rate plus a spread based on leverage (base rate is the highest of (a) the Canadian Prime Rate and (b) the Canadian Dealer Offered Rate (“CDOR Rate”) for an interest period of one month plus
1%
). On April 13, 2017, the Company entered into a first amendment (the “Amendment”) to the New Credit Facility. The Amendment increased the lease adjusted leverage ratio to 5.25x through October 1, 2017 before stepping down to 5.0x through July 15, 2018 and returning to 4.75x thereafter. The Amendment also provides for additional pricing tiers that increase LIBOR spread rates and commitment fees to the extent the Company’s lease adjusted leverage ratio exceeds 4.75x, in addition to revising terms for permitted acquisitions and investments under the New Credit Facility. The Amendment is effective through October 7, 2018 and is cancelable at the Company’s discretion.
The New Credit Facility matures on
June 30, 2021
. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility are secured by first priority liens and security interests in substantially all of the Company’s assets, including the capital stock of certain Company subsidiaries, and are available for financing activities including restaurant construction costs, working capital and general corporate purposes, including, among other uses, to refinance certain indebtedness, permitted acquisitions, and redemption of capital stock. As of
December 31, 2017
, the Company had outstanding borrowings under the New Credit Facility of
$265.5 million
, in addition to amounts issued under letters of credit of
$7.6 million
, which reduced the amount available under the New Credit Facility but are not recorded as debt.
Covenants.
We are subject to a number of customary covenants under the New Credit Facility, including limitations on additional borrowings, acquisitions, capital expenditures, stock repurchases, lease commitments, and dividend payments. We are also required to maintain two financial ratios. First, we are required to maintain a lease adjusted leverage ratio below 5.0x EBITDAR as of the end of 2017. Secondly, we are required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio minimum of 1.25x our fixed charges. As of
December 31, 2017
, our lease adjusted leverage ratio was 4.04x and our fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.04x. The lease adjusted leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, EBITDAR, and fixed charges are defined in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement for our New Credit Facility, which is filed as Exhibit 10.32 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Debt Outstanding.
Total debt and capital lease obligations outstanding decreased
$70.5 million
to
$277.3 million
at
December 31, 2017
from
$347.8 million
at
December 25, 2016
, primarily due to net repayments of $70.0 million on the New Credit Facility during
2017
.
Stock Repurchase.
On February 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors re-authorized the Company’s share repurchase program and approved the repurchase of up to
$100 million
of the Company’s common stock. The share repurchase authorization became effective on February 11, 2016, and will terminate upon completing the repurchase of
$100 million
of common stock unless otherwise terminated by the board. Purchases under the repurchase program may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Purchases may be made from time to time at the Company’s discretion and the timing and amount of any share repurchases will be determined based on share price, market conditions, legal requirements and other factors. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and it may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
In
2017
, the Company did not repurchase any of its common stock. In 2016, we repurchased 940,034 shares with an average purchase price of $49.02 per share for a total of $46.1 million. In
2015
, we repurchased 556,049 shares with an average purchase price of $71.93 per share for a total of $40.0 million.
31
Contractual Obligations.
The following table summarizes the amounts of payments due under specified contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2017
(in thousands):
|
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
2018
|
2019 - 2020
|
2021 - 2022
|
2023 and
Thereafter |
||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt obligations
(1)
|
$
|
306,765
|
|
$
|
15,982
|
|
$
|
17,901
|
|
$
|
271,942
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|||||
|
Capital lease obligations
(2)
|
14,579
|
|
1,234
|
|
2,472
|
|
2,303
|
|
8,570
|
|
||||||||||
|
Operating lease obligations
(3)
|
554,155
|
|
75,613
|
|
139,896
|
|
114,129
|
|
224,517
|
|
||||||||||
|
Purchase obligations
(4)
|
203,465
|
|
95,724
|
|
85,643
|
|
22,098
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||
|
Other non-current liabilities
(5)
|
9,579
|
|
1,085
|
|
2,007
|
|
1,651
|
|
4,836
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total contractual obligations
|
$
|
1,088,543
|
|
$
|
189,638
|
|
$
|
247,919
|
|
$
|
412,123
|
|
$
|
238,863
|
|
|||||
___________________________________
|
(1)
|
Long-term debt obligations primarily represent minimum required principal payments under our credit agreement including estimated interest of
$40.2 million
based on a
3.50%
average borrowing interest rate.
|
|
(2)
|
Capital lease obligations include interest of
$3.6 million
.
|
|
(3)
|
Operating lease obligations represent future minimum lease commitments payable for land, buildings, and equipment used in our operations. This table excludes contingent rents, including amounts which are determined as a percentage of adjusted sales in excess of specified levels.
|
|
(4)
|
Purchase obligations include commitments for the construction of new restaurants and other capital improvement projects and lease commitments for Company-owned restaurants where leases have been executed but construction has not begun. It also includes the Company’s share of system-wide commitments for beverage and supply items. These amounts require estimates and could vary due to the timing of volumes. Excluded are any agreements that are cancelable without significant penalty.
|
|
(5)
|
Other non-current liabilities primarily represent employee deferred compensation plan liability. Refer to Note 16,
Employee Benefit Programs,
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report for additional information.
|
Financial Condition and Future Liquidity.
We require capital principally to grow the business through new restaurant construction, as well as to maintain, improve and refurbish existing restaurants, support for infrastructure needs, and for general operating purposes. In addition, we have and may continue to use capital to pay principal on our borrowings and repurchase our common stock. Our primary short-term and long-term sources of liquidity are expected to be cash flows from operations and our revolving credit facility. Based upon current levels of operations and anticipated growth, we expect that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet debt service, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. We and the restaurant industry in general maintain relatively low levels of accounts receivable and inventories, and vendors generally grant short-term trade credit for purchases, such as food and supplies. The addition of new restaurants and refurbishment of existing restaurants are reflected as long-term assets and not as part of working capital.
We typically maintain current liabilities in excess of our current assets which results in a working capital deficit. We are able to operate with a working capital deficit because restaurant sales are primarily conducted on a cash or credit card basis. Rapid turnover of inventory results in limited investment in inventories, and cash from sales is usually received before related payables for food, supplies, and payroll become due. In addition, receipts from the sale of gift cards are received well in advance of related redemptions. Rather than maintain higher cash balances that would result from this pattern of operating cash flows, we typically utilize operating cash flows in excess of those required for currently-maturing liabilities to pay for capital expenditures, debt repayment, or to repurchase stock. When necessary, we utilize our revolving credit facility to satisfy short-term liquidity requirements. However, we believe our future cash flows will be sufficient to satisfy any working capital deficits.
Inflation
The primary inflationary factors affecting our operations are labor, food costs, energy costs, and materials used in the construction of new restaurants. A large number of our restaurant personnel are paid at rates based on the applicable minimum wage, and increases in the minimum wage have directly affected our labor costs in recent years. Many of our leases require us to pay taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and utilities, all of which are generally subject to inflationary increases. We believe labor cost inflation and food cost inflation, due primarily to ground beef and potatoes, had a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations during 2017. We believe food cost deflation had a positive impact on our financial condition and results of operations during 2016, due primarily to ground beef. Food cost deflation was partially offset by a negative impact of inflation on labor costs in 2016. We believe inflation had a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations in 2015 due primarily to higher wages, costs for certain supplies, and commodity prices for certain foods
32
we purchased at market rates. Uncertainties related to fluctuations in costs, including energy costs, commodity prices, annual indexed wage increases, and construction materials make it difficult to predict what impact, if any, inflation may have on our business during 2018, but it is anticipated that inflation will continue to have a negative impact on labor costs and commodity costs in fiscal year 2018.
Seasonality
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the summer months and winter holiday season. As a result, our quarterly and annual operating results and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate significantly as a result of seasonality. Accordingly, results for any one quarter or year are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year, and comparable restaurant sales for any particular future period may fluctuate.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those we believe are both significant and require us to make difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because we need to estimate the effect of inherently uncertain matters. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experiences and various other factors we believe to be appropriate under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates, including our estimates of future restaurant level cash flows, which are subject to the current economic environment, and we might obtain different results if we used different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the following as the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most subjective and complex judgment. Information regarding the Company’s other significant accounting policies is disclosed in Note 1,
Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.
Long-lived assets, including restaurant sites, leasehold improvements, and other fixed assets, and amortizable intangible assets are reviewed when indicators of impairment are present. Expected cash flows associated with an asset are the key factor in determining the recoverability of the asset. Identifiable cash flows are measured at the restaurant level. The estimate of cash flows is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance, including assumptions on future revenue trends. Management’s estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, changes in economic conditions, changes to our business model, or changes in operating performance. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Judgments made by management related to the expected useful lives of long-lived assets and our ability to realize undiscounted cash flows in excess of the carrying amounts of such assets are affected by factors such as the ongoing maintenance and improvements of the assets, changes in economic conditions, and changes in operating performance. As the ongoing expected cash flows and carrying amounts of long-lived assets are assessed, these factors could cause us to realize a material impairment charge. Each restaurant’s past and present operating performance were reviewed in combination with projected future results, primarily through projected undiscounted cash flows, which indicated possible impairment. We compared the carrying amount of each restaurant to its fair value as estimated by management. The fair value of the long-lived assets is typically determined using a discounted cash flow projection model. The discount factor is determined using external information regarding the risk-free rate of return, industry beta factors, and premium adjustments. These factors are combined with internal information such as the Company’s average cost of debt and effective tax rate to determine a weighted average cost of capital which is applied to the undiscounted cash flows. In certain cases, management uses other market information, when available, to estimate the fair value of a restaurant. The impairment charges represent the excess of each restaurant’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. During
2017
, we determined
13
Company-owned restaurants were impaired, which resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of
$6.9 million
. During
2016
and 2015, we impaired
19
and
two
Company-owned restaurants for non-cash charges of
$24.4 million
and
$0.6 million
.
Information technology systems, such as internal-use computer software, are reviewed and tested for recoverability if the internal-use computer software is not expected to provide substantive service potential, a significant change occurs in the extent or manner in which the software is used or is expected to be used, a significant change is made or will be made to the software program, or costs of developing or modifying internal-use software significantly exceed the amount originally expected to develop or modify the software. During 2016, the Company determined certain software related to its ERP system was obsolete upon migration to a cloud-based ERP system. The Company also determined certain software in development for supply chain management would not meet the Company’s requirements if it were implemented. As a result, we recorded a
$2.5 million
impairment charge to write down the capitalized costs associated with this software.
33
Goodwill.
Goodwill, which is not subject to amortization, is evaluated for impairment annually at the end of the Company’s third fiscal quarter, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change, such as material deterioration in performance or a significant number of store closures, that would indicate that an impairment may exist. Goodwill is evaluated at the level of the Company’s single operating segment, which also represents the Company’s only reporting unit. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company may first perform a qualitative assessment, or step zero of the impairment test, to determine whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative assessment and calculate the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the carrying value to the estimated fair value. Our decision to perform a qualitative impairment assessment in a given year is influenced by a number of factors, including the significance of the excess of the reporting unit’s estimated fair value over carrying value at the last quantitative assessment date, the amount of time in between quantitative fair value assessments, and the date of our acquisitions.
The Company performed a qualitative assessment for the 2017 annual impairment evaluation at the end of the third fiscal quarter and determined that goodwill was not impaired. No indicators of impairment were identified from the date of our impairment test through the end of 2017. By review of macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance compared with prior projections, and other relevant entity-specific events, we determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying amount.
Lease Accounting.
Under the provisions of certain of our leases, there are rent holidays and/or escalations in payments over the base lease term, as well as renewal periods. The effects of rent holidays and escalations are reflected in rent costs on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, which includes cancelable option periods when it is deemed to be reasonably assured that we will exercise such option periods due to the fact that we would incur an economic penalty for not doing so. The lease term commences on the date when we become legally obligated for the rent payments which coincides with the time when the landlord delivers the property for us to develop and we waive contract contingencies. All rent costs recognized during construction periods are expensed immediately as pre-opening expenses.
Judgments made by management for its lease obligations include the probable term for each lease that affects the classification and accounting for a lease as capital or operating; the rent holidays and/or escalations in payments that are taken into consideration when calculating straight-line rent; incremental borrowing rates; and the term over which leasehold improvements for each restaurant facility are amortized. These judgments may produce materially different amounts of depreciation, amortization and rent expense than would be reported if different assumed lease terms were used. We have not made any changes to the nature of the assumptions used to account for leases in the past three years.
Insurance/Self-Insurance Liabilities.
The Company is self-insured for a portion of losses related to group health insurance, general liability and workers’ compensation. We maintain stop-loss coverage with third party insurers to limit our total exposure. The self-insurance liability represents an estimate of the cost of claims incurred and unpaid as of the balance sheet date. The estimated liability is not discounted and is established based upon analysis of historical data and actuarial based estimates, as well as incurred but not reported claims, and is closely monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances. Should a greater number of claims occur compared to what was estimated, or should medical costs or other claim costs increase beyond what was expected, our accrued liabilities might not be sufficient, and additional expenses may be recorded. Actual claims experience could also be more favorable than estimated, resulting in expense reductions. Unanticipated changes in our estimates may produce materially different amounts of expense than that reported historically under these programs. We have not made any significant changes to the nature of the assumptions used to account our self-insurance liabilities in the past three years.
Income Taxes.
The determination of the Company’s provision for income taxes requires management’s judgment in the use of estimates and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Judgment is also required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. The Company establishes contingency reserves for material, known tax exposures relating to deductions, transactions and other matters involving some uncertainty as to the proper tax treatment of the item. The Company’s reserves reflect its judgment as to the resolution of the issues involved if subject to judicial review. Several years may elapse before a particular matter, for which the Company has established a reserve, is audited and finally resolved or clarified. While the Company believes its reserves are adequate to cover reasonably expected tax risks, issues raised by a tax authority may be finally resolved at an amount different than the related reserve. Such differences could materially increase or decrease the Company’s income tax provision in the current and/or future periods. When facts and circumstances change (including a resolution of an issue or statute of limitations expiration), these reserves are adjusted through the provision for income taxes in the period of change. To the extent the Company determines it will not realize the benefit of some or all of its
34
deferred tax assets, then these assets will be adjusted through the Company’s provision for income taxes in the period in which this determination is made.
Unearned Revenues.
Unearned revenues represent our liability for gift cards that have been sold but not yet redeemed, as well as deferred revenues related to our loyalty program. We recognize sales when the gift card is redeemed by the customer. Although there are no expiration dates or dormancy fees for our gift cards, based on our historical gift card redemption patterns, we can reasonably estimate the amount of gift cards for which redemption is remote, which is referred to as “breakage.” We recognize breakage within other revenue over the expected period of redemption as the remaining gift card values are redeemed. If actual redemption patterns vary from our estimates, actual gift card breakage income may differ from the amounts recorded. We update our estimate of our breakage rate periodically and apply that rate to gift card redemptions.
Under the terms of our Red Robin Royalty™ loyalty program, among other benefits, a registered member receives an award for a free entrée after the purchase of nine qualifying entrées. We recognize the current sale of an entrée and defer a portion of the revenue to reflect partial pre-payment for the future entrée the member is entitled to receive. We estimate the future value of the award based on the historical average value of redemptions. We also estimate what portion of registered members are not likely to reach the ninth purchase based on historical activity and recognize the deferred revenue related to those purchases. We recognize the deferred revenue on earned rewards when redeemed or upon expiration, which is 60 days after the award is earned. We compare the estimate of the value of future awards to historical redemptions to evaluate the reasonableness of the deferred amount.
Stock-Based Compensation.
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with fair value recognition provisions, under which we recognize stock-based compensation using the Black-Scholes or Monte Carlo (for performance-based units) option pricing model and recognize expense on a graded vesting basis over the requisite service periods of an option. Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards require the input of highly subjective and judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in the model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. We have not made any changes to the nature of the assumptions used to account for stock-based compensation in the past three years.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Except for operating leases (primarily restaurant leases) entered into the normal course of business, we do not have any material off balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2,
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report.
Interest Rate Risk
Under our New Credit Facility, we are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on borrowings. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility, if denominated in U.S. Dollars, are subject to rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a spread based on leverage or a base rate plus a spread based on leverage. The base rate is the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, and (c) LIBOR for an Interest Period of one month plus 1%. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility, if denominated in Canadian Dollars, are subject to rates based on LIBOR plus a spread based on leverage or a base rate plus a spread based on leverage. The base rate for these purposes is the highest of (a) the Canadian Prime Rate and (b) the Canadian Dealer Offered Rate (“CDOR Rate”) for an interest period of one month plus 1%. As of
December 31, 2017
, we had
$265.5 million
of borrowings subject to variable interest rates. A 1.0% change in the effective interest rate applied to these loans would have resulted in pre-tax interest expense fluctuation of
$2.7 million
on an annualized basis.
We continue to monitor our interest rate risk on an ongoing basis and may use interest rate swaps or similar instruments in the future to manage our exposure to interest rate changes related to our borrowings as the Company deems appropriate. Refer to Note 8,
Derivative and Other Comprehensive Income,
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report for additional information.
35
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We operate 18 restaurants in Canada and the Canadian Dollar is the functional currency for our Canadian restaurant operations. We have currency risk related to transactions denominated in Canadian Dollars and the translation of our Canadian restaurants’ financial results into U.S. Dollars.
Due to the immateriality of our Canadian restaurant operations, our foreign currency risk is limited at this date. As a result, the Company has not entered into any foreign currency exchange rate contracts to hedge against changes in foreign currency exchange rates on assets and liabilities expected to be settled at a future date. Refer to the “Risk Factors” set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this filing for more information about the market risks to which we are exposed as a result of our foreign operations.
Commodity Price Risks
The Company’s restaurant menus are highly dependent upon a few select commodities, including ground beef, poultry, and potatoes. We may or may not have the ability to increase menu prices, or vary menu items, in response to food commodity price increases. A 1.0% increase in food costs would negatively impact cost of sales by approximately
$3.2 million
on an annualized basis.
Many of the food products we purchase are affected by changes in weather, production, availability, seasonality, and other factors outside our control. In an effort to mitigate some of this risk, we have entered into fixed price agreements on some of our food and beverage products, including certain proteins, produce, and cooking oil. As of
December 31, 2017
, 59% of our estimated annual food and beverage purchases were covered by fixed price contracts, most of which are scheduled to expire at various times through the end of 2018. These contracts may exclude related expenses such as fuel surcharges and other fees. In addition, we believe that almost all of our food and supplies are available from several sources, which helps to reduce or mitigate these risks.
36
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
’
Equity
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and December 25, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and December 25, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
Denver, Colorado
February 27, 2018
38
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 25, 2016
|
|||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Current Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
17,714
|
|
$
|
11,732
|
|
||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
26,499
|
|
24,166
|
|
||||
|
Inventories
|
29,553
|
|
29,899
|
|
||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
31,038
|
|
27,049
|
|
||||
|
Total current assets
|
104,804
|
|
92,846
|
|
||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
638,151
|
|
656,439
|
|
||||
|
Goodwill
|
96,979
|
|
95,935
|
|
||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
38,273
|
|
42,270
|
|
||||
|
Other assets, net
|
32,408
|
|
31,055
|
|
||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
910,615
|
|
$
|
918,545
|
|
||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders
’
Equity:
|
||||||||
|
Current Liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
35,347
|
|
$
|
26,602
|
|
||
|
Accrued payroll and payroll-related liabilities
|
32,777
|
|
34,703
|
|
||||
|
Unearned revenue
|
55,915
|
|
50,199
|
|
||||
|
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities
|
36,300
|
|
29,505
|
|
||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
160,339
|
|
141,009
|
|
||||
|
Deferred rent
|
74,980
|
|
72,431
|
|
||||
|
Long-term debt
|
266,375
|
|
336,375
|
|
||||
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
|
10,197
|
|
10,805
|
|
||||
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
11,289
|
|
9,872
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities
|
523,180
|
|
570,492
|
|
||||
|
Stockholders
’
Equity:
|
||||||||
|
Common stock; $0.001 par value: 45,000 shares authorized; 17,851 and 17,851 shares issued; 12,954 and 12,828 shares outstanding
|
18
|
|
18
|
|
||||
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 3,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Treasury stock 4,897 and 5,023 shares, at cost
|
(202,485
|
)
|
(207,720
|
)
|
||||
|
Paid-in capital
|
210,708
|
|
208,022
|
|
||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
(3,566
|
)
|
(5,008
|
)
|
||||
|
Retained earnings
|
382,760
|
|
352,741
|
|
||||
|
Total stockholders
’
equity
|
387,435
|
|
348,053
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
’
equity
|
$
|
910,615
|
|
$
|
918,545
|
|
||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
39
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 25, 2016
|
December 27, 2015
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
|
Restaurant revenue
|
$
|
1,365,060
|
|
$
|
1,280,669
|
|
$
|
1,238,898
|
|
|||
|
Franchise royalties and fees
|
11,044
|
|
11,209
|
|
12,526
|
|
||||||
|
Other revenue
|
4,825
|
|
4,563
|
|
6,168
|
|
||||||
|
Total revenues
|
1,380,929
|
|
1,296,441
|
|
1,257,592
|
|
||||||
|
Costs and expenses:
|
||||||||||||
|
Restaurant operating costs (excluding depreciation and amortization shown separately below):
|
||||||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
320,355
|
|
298,249
|
|
304,637
|
|
||||||
|
Labor (includes $346, $181, and $115 of stock-based compensation)
|
475,432
|
|
439,232
|
|
403,517
|
|
||||||
|
Other operating
|
178,309
|
|
167,727
|
|
150,767
|
|
||||||
|
Occupancy
|
112,753
|
|
107,408
|
|
100,007
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
92,545
|
|
86,695
|
|
77,374
|
|
||||||
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses (includes $4,442, $4,364, and $4,609 of stock-based compensation)
|
150,019
|
|
137,887
|
|
146,656
|
|
||||||
|
Pre-opening and acquisition costs
|
5,570
|
|
8,025
|
|
7,008
|
|
||||||
|
Other charges
|
6,914
|
|
39,648
|
|
581
|
|
||||||
|
Total costs and expenses
|
1,341,897
|
|
1,284,871
|
|
1,190,547
|
|
||||||
|
Income from operations
|
39,032
|
|
11,570
|
|
67,045
|
|
||||||
|
Other (income) expense:
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
10,955
|
|
7,239
|
|
3,680
|
|
||||||
|
Interest (income) and other, net
|
(943
|
)
|
(457
|
)
|
129
|
|
||||||
|
Total other expenses
|
10,012
|
|
6,782
|
|
3,809
|
|
||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
29,020
|
|
4,788
|
|
63,236
|
|
||||||
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
(999
|
)
|
(6,937
|
)
|
15,532
|
|
||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
30,019
|
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
$
|
47,704
|
|
|||
|
Earnings per share:
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
12,899
|
|
13,332
|
|
14,042
|
|
||||||
|
Diluted
|
12,998
|
|
13,462
|
|
14,216
|
|
||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 25, 2016
|
December 27, 2015
|
||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
30,019
|
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
$
|
47,704
|
|
|||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
||||||||||||
|
Changes in derivative instruments:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net change in fair value of interest rate swap
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net loss reclassified into interest expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
36
|
|
||||||
|
Tax expense
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(13
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net changes in derivative instruments
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
1,442
|
|
371
|
|
(3,475
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
1,442
|
|
371
|
|
(3,455
|
)
|
||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$
|
31,461
|
|
$
|
12,096
|
|
$
|
44,249
|
|
|||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
41
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
’
EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
Common Stock
|
Treasury Stock
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss,
net of tax
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 28, 2014
|
17,851
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
3,808
|
|
$
|
(132,252
|
)
|
$
|
200,617
|
|
$
|
(1,924
|
)
|
$
|
293,312
|
|
$
|
359,771
|
|
||||||||
|
Exercise of options, issuance of restricted stock, shares exchanged for exercise and tax, and stock issued through employee stock purchase plan
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(141
|
)
|
4,922
|
|
(1,515
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,407
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,980
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,980
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
556
|
|
(40,009
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(40,009
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Non-cash stock compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,913
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,913
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
47,704
|
|
47,704
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3,455
|
)
|
—
|
|
(3,455
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 27, 2015
|
17,851
|
|
18
|
|
4,223
|
|
(167,339
|
)
|
205,995
|
|
(5,379
|
)
|
341,016
|
|
374,311
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Exercise of options, issuance of restricted stock, shares exchanged for exercise and tax, and stock issued through employee stock purchase plan
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(140
|
)
|
5,697
|
|
(3,001
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,696
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
411
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
411
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
940
|
|
(46,078
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,078
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
|
Non-cash stock compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,617
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,617
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
11,725
|
|
11,725
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
371
|
|
—
|
|
371
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 25, 2016
|
17,851
|
|
18
|
|
5,023
|
|
(207,720
|
)
|
208,022
|
|
(5,008
|
)
|
352,741
|
|
348,053
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Exercise of options, issuance of restricted stock, shares exchanged for exercise and tax, and stock issued through employee stock purchase plan
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(126
|
)
|
5,235
|
|
(2,192
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,043
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Non-cash stock compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,878
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,878
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
30,019
|
|
30,019
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,442
|
|
—
|
|
1,442
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2017
|
17,851
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
4,897
|
|
$
|
(202,485
|
)
|
$
|
210,708
|
|
$
|
(3,566
|
)
|
$
|
382,760
|
|
$
|
387,435
|
|
||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
(In thousands)
|
Year Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 25, 2016
|
December 27, 2015
|
||||||||||
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
30,019
|
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
$
|
47,704
|
|
|||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
92,545
|
|
86,695
|
|
77,374
|
|
||||||
|
Gift card breakage
|
(4,026
|
)
|
(3,517
|
)
|
(5,079
|
)
|
||||||
|
(Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes and benefit from exercise of stock options
|
(6,478
|
)
|
(11,929
|
)
|
2,681
|
|
||||||
|
Other charges - asset impairment and restaurant closure costs
|
6,914
|
|
31,842
|
|
581
|
|
||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
4,788
|
|
4,545
|
|
4,724
|
|
||||||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and other
|
1,043
|
|
555
|
|
479
|
|
||||||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired business:
|
||||||||||||
|
Accounts receivable and other current assets
|
(5,130
|
)
|
(3,537
|
)
|
4,272
|
|
||||||
|
Inventory
|
416
|
|
(1,218
|
)
|
(2,375
|
)
|
||||||
|
Other assets
|
4,251
|
|
(1,618
|
)
|
(3,055
|
)
|
||||||
|
Trade accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities
|
21,578
|
|
(22,414
|
)
|
1,536
|
|
||||||
|
Unearned revenue
|
9,701
|
|
5,073
|
|
7,909
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred rent
|
986
|
|
2,755
|
|
4,172
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
156,607
|
|
98,957
|
|
140,923
|
|
||||||
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Purchases of property, equipment and intangible assets
|
(83,531
|
)
|
(163,767
|
)
|
(166,284
|
)
|
||||||
|
Acquisition of franchise restaurants, net of cash acquired
|
—
|
|
(39,966
|
)
|
(2,532
|
)
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate and property, plant, and equipment and other
|
241
|
|
4,354
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other investing activities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(295
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(83,290
|
)
|
(199,379
|
)
|
(169,111
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
186,550
|
|
366,500
|
|
415,500
|
|
||||||
|
Payments of long-term debt and capital leases
|
(257,215
|
)
|
(233,642
|
)
|
(352,550
|
)
|
||||||
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
—
|
|
(46,078
|
)
|
(40,009
|
)
|
||||||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
(664
|
)
|
(1,058
|
)
|
(319
|
)
|
||||||
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
—
|
|
411
|
|
1,980
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan
|
3,405
|
|
3,200
|
|
4,165
|
|
||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(67,924
|
)
|
89,333
|
|
28,767
|
|
||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
589
|
|
116
|
|
(282
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
5,982
|
|
$
|
(10,973
|
)
|
$
|
297
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
11,732
|
|
22,705
|
|
22,408
|
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
$
|
17,714
|
|
$
|
11,732
|
|
$
|
22,705
|
|
|||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries (“Red Robin,” “we,” “us,” “our”, or the “Company”), primarily develops, operates, and franchises casual-dining restaurants in North America. At
December 31, 2017
, the Company owned and operated
480
restaurants located in
39
states and
two
Canadian provinces. The Company also
had
86
casual-dining
restaurants operated by franchisees in
15
states as of
December 31, 2017
. The Company operates its business as
one
operating and
one
reportable segment.
Principles of Consolidation and Fiscal Year
—The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Red Robin and its wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions. The Company’s fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the last Sunday of the calendar year. Fiscal year
2017
included 53 weeks, ending on December 31, 2017. Fiscal years
2016
,
2015
, 2014, and 2013 each included 52 weeks, ending on
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
. Fiscal year 2018 will include 52 weeks and will end on December 30, 2018. We refer to our fiscal years as 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013 throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The areas that require management’s most significant estimates are impairment of long lived assets, goodwill, lease accounting, insurance/self-insurance reserves, estimating fair value, income taxes, unearned revenue, and stock-based compensation expense. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
—Certain amounts presented in prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. For the fiscal year ended
December 25, 2016
, the Company reclassified impairment charges and restaurant closure costs of
$34.4 million
from Asset impairment and restaurant closure costs to Other charges on the consolidated statements of operations. For the fiscal year ended
December 25, 2016
, the Company also reclassified litigation contingencies of
$3.9 million
and reorganization costs of
$1.3 million
from Selling, general, and administrative expenses to Other charges on the consolidated statements of operations. For the fiscal year ended
December 27, 2015
, the Company reclassified impairment charges of
$0.6 million
from Asset impairment and restaurant closure costs to Other charges on the consolidated statements of operations. Management believes separating these items on the consolidated statements of operations provides more clarity for readers of these financial statements. See Note 3,
Other Charges
.
For the fiscal years ended
December 25, 2016
and
December 27, 2015
, the Company reclassified local marketing costs of
$6.3 million
and
$3.6 million
from Other operating to Selling, general, and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. Management believes this presentation better reflects marketing expenses subject to corporate, rather than restaurant-level, decision making.
Cash Equivalents
—The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Amounts receivable from credit card issuers are typically converted to cash within
two
to
four
days of the original sales transaction and are considered to be cash equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with multiple financial institutions. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and are maintained with financial institutions with reputable credit and therefore bear minimal credit risk. The Company holds cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions in excess of amounts covered by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and sometimes invests excess cash in money market funds not insured by the FDIC.
Accounts Receivable
—Accounts receivable consists primarily of third-party gift card receivables, tenant improvement allowances, and trade receivables due from franchisees for royalties. At the end of
2017
, there was approximately
$14.3 million
of gift cards in transit in accounts receivable related to gift cards that were sold by third-party retailers compared to
$12.4 million
at the end of
2016
. At the end of
2017
, there was also approximately
$2.2 million
related to tenant improvement allowances in accounts receivable compared to
$3.8 million
at the end of
2016
.
Inventories
—Inventories consist of food, beverages, and supplies valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value. At the end of
2017
and
2016
, food and beverage inventories were
$9.0 million
and
$9.8 million
and supplies inventories were
$20.6 million
and
$20.1 million
.
44
Property and Equipment
—Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method, based on the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the terms of the underlying leases of the related assets. Interest incurred on funds used to construct Company-owned restaurants is capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the related assets. Capitalized interest totaled
$0.3 million
,
$0.2 million
, and
$0.2 million
in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
.
The estimated useful lives for property and equipment are:
|
Buildings
|
5 to 20 years
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
Shorter of lease term or estimated useful life, not to exceed 20 years
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
5 to 20 years
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
2 to 5 years
|
|
The Company capitalizes certain overhead related to the development and construction of its new restaurants as well as certain information technology infrastructure upgrades. Costs incurred for the potential development of restaurants that are subsequently terminated are expensed.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net
—Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Intangible assets comprise primarily leasehold interests, acquired franchise rights, and the costs of purchased liquor licenses. Leasehold interests primarily represent the fair values of acquired lease contracts having contractual rents lower than fair market rents and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining initial lease term. Acquired franchise rights, which represent the acquired value of franchise contracts, are amortized over the term of the franchise agreements. The costs of obtaining non-transferable liquor licenses from local government agencies are capitalized and generally amortized over a period of up to
20 years
. The costs of purchasing transferable liquor licenses through open markets in jurisdictions with a limited number of authorized liquor licenses are capitalized as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Goodwill, which is not subject to amortization, is evaluated for impairment annually as of the end of the Company’s third fiscal quarter, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change, such as material deterioration in performance or a significant number of store closures, that would indicate an impairment may exist. Goodwill is evaluated at the level of the Company’s single operating segment, which also represents the Company’s only reporting unit.
When evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company may first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative assessment and calculate the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the carrying value to the estimated fair value. Our decision to perform a qualitative impairment assessment in a given year is influenced by a number of factors, including the significance of the excess of the reporting unit’s estimated fair value over carrying value at the last quantitative assessment date, the amount of time in between quantitative fair value assessments, and the date of our acquisitions.
The Company performed a qualitative assessment for the 2017 annual impairment evaluation at the end of the third fiscal quarter and determined goodwill was not impaired. No indicators of impairment were identified from the date of our impairment test through the end of 2017. By review of macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance compared with prior projections, and other relevant entity-specific events, we determined it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying amount.
Liquor licenses with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount is not recoverable, we record an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. We determine fair value based on prices in the open market for license in same or similar jurisdictions. No impairment charges were recorded in
2017
,
2016
, or
2015
.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
—The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including restaurant sites, leasehold improvements, information technology systems and other fixed assets, and amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. Identifiable cash flows are measured at the lowest level for
45
which they are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities, generally at the restaurant level. If the assets are determined to be impaired, the amount of impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Fair value is generally determined using forecasted cash flows discounted using an estimated weighted average cost of capital. Management may also utilize other market information to determine fair value when relevant information is available. Restaurant sites and other assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Information technology systems, such as internal-use computer software, are reviewed and tested for recoverability if the internal-use computer software is not expected to provide substantive service potential, a significant change occurs in the extent or manner in which the software is used or is expected to be used, a significant change is made or will be made to the software program, or costs of developing or modifying internal-use software significantly exceed the amount originally expected to develop or modify the software.
During
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, the Company recorded impairments of certain long-lived assets. See Note 3,
Other Charges
.
Other Assets, net
—Other assets, net consist primarily of assets related to various deposits, the employee deferred compensation plan and unamortized debt issuance costs on revolving credit facilities. Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis which approximates the effective interest rate method over the term of the Company’s long term debt. Refer to Note 7,
Borrowings
.
Revenue Recognition
—Revenues consist of sales from restaurant operations, gift card breakage, franchise royalties and fees, and other miscellaneous revenue. Revenues from restaurant sales are recognized when payment is tendered at the point of sale.
The Company sells gift cards which do not have an expiration date, and it does not deduct dormancy fees from outstanding gift card balances. The Company recognizes revenue from gift cards when: (i) the gift card is redeemed by the customer; or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote (gift card breakage), and the Company determines that there is not a legal obligation to remit the unredeemed gift card balance to the relevant jurisdiction. The determination of the gift card breakage rate is based upon the Company’s specific historical redemption patterns. The Company recognizes gift card breakage by applying its estimate of the rate of gift card breakage over the period of estimated redemption.
For the fiscal years ended
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, the Company recognized
$4.0 million
,
$3.5 million
and
$5.1 million
in revenue related to unredeemed gift card breakage. Gift card breakage is included in Other revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Unearned gift card revenue at the end of
2017
and
2016
was
$45.4 million
and
$41.0 million
.
The Company typically grants franchise rights to franchisees for a term of
20
years, with the right to extend the term for an additional
ten
years if various conditions are satisfied by the franchisee. The Company provides management expertise, training, pre-opening assistance, and restaurant operating assistance in exchange for area development fees, franchise fees, license fees, and royalties of
4%
of the franchised adjusted gross restaurant sales in 2017. The Company recognizes area development fees and franchise fees as income when the Company has performed all material obligations and initial services, which generally occurs upon the opening of the new restaurant. Until earned, these fees are accounted for as an accrued liability. Area development fees are recognized proportionately with the opening of each new restaurant. Royalties are accrued as earned and are calculated each period based on the franchisee’s reported adjusted sales.
Red Robin Royalty™ deferred revenue primarily relates to a program in which registered members earn an award for a free entrée for every
nine
entrées purchased. We recognize the current sale of an entrée and defer a portion of the revenue to reflect partial pre-payment for the future entrée the member is entitled to receive. We estimate the future value of the award based on the historical average value of redemptions. We also estimate what portion of registered members are not likely to reach the ninth purchase based on historical activity and recognize the deferred revenue related to those purchases. We recognize the deferred revenue in Restaurant revenue on earned rewards when redeemed or upon expiration, which is
60
days after the award is earned. We compare the estimate of the value of future awards to historical redemptions to evaluate the reasonableness of the deferred amount. Deferred loyalty revenue, which was included in Unearned revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, was
$10.6 million
and
$9.2 million
at
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
.
Advertising
—Under the Company’s franchise agreements, both the Company and the franchisees must contribute a minimum percentage of revenues to
two
national media advertising funds (the “Advertising Funds”). These Advertising Funds are used to build the Company’s brand equity and awareness primarily through a national marketing strategy, including national television advertising, digital media, social media programs, email, loyalty, and public relations initiatives. Contributions to
46
these Advertising Funds are recorded as advertising costs under Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Total advertising costs were
$48.0 million
,
$37.6 million
, and
$34.8 million
in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, and were included in Selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Advertising production costs are expensed in the period when the advertising first takes place. Other advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Rent
—The Company’s leases generally contain escalating rent payments over the lease term as well as optional renewal periods. The Company accounts for its leases by recognizing rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, which includes reasonably assured renewal periods. The lease term begins when the Company has the right to control the use of the property, which is typically before rent payments are due under the lease agreement. The difference between the rent expense and rent paid is recorded as Deferred rent in the consolidated balance sheets. Rent expense for the period prior to the restaurant opening is expensed in pre-opening costs. Tenant incentives used to fund leasehold improvements are recorded in deferred rent and amortized as reductions of lease rent expense ratably over the lease term.
Additionally, certain of the Company’s operating lease agreements contain clauses that provide for additional contingent rent based on a percentage of sales greater than certain specified target amounts. The Company recognizes contingent rent expense prior to the achievement of the specified target that triggers contingent rent, provided the achievement of that target is considered probable. Refer to Note 12
, Commitments and Contingencies.
Self-Insurance Programs
—The Company utilizes a self-insurance plan for health, general liability, and workers’ compensation coverage. Predetermined loss limits have been arranged with insurance companies to limit the Company’s per occurrence cash outlay. Accrued liabilities and accrued payroll and payroll-related liabilities include the estimated cost to settle reported claims and incurred but unreported claims.
Legal Contingencies
—In the normal course of business, we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, the outcomes of which are uncertain. We record an accrual for legal contingencies when we determine that it is probable that we have incurred a liability and we can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. In making such determinations we evaluate, among other things, the probability of an unfavorable outcome and, when we believe it probable that a liability has been incurred, our ability to make a reasonable estimate of the loss. See Note 12,
Commitments and Contingencies
, for additional details.
Pre-opening Costs
—Pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred. Pre-opening costs include rental expenses through the date of opening for each restaurant, travel expenses, wages and benefits for the training and opening teams, as well as food, beverage, and other restaurant opening costs incurred prior to a restaurant opening for business.
Income Taxes
—Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for the estimated effects of all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized for the estimated effects of all deductible temporary differences and net operating losses, if any, and tax credit carryforwards.
Earnings Per Share
—Basic earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share amounts are calculated based upon the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the year. Potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if holders of options exercised their holdings into common stock.
The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate the impact of outstanding stock options. Basic weighted average shares outstanding is reconciled to diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
as follows (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
12,899
|
|
13,332
|
|
14,042
|
|
|||
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and awards
|
99
|
|
130
|
|
174
|
|
|||
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
12,998
|
|
13,462
|
|
14,216
|
|
|||
|
Awards excluded due to anti-dilutive effect on diluted earnings per share
|
329
|
|
229
|
|
61
|
|
|||
47
Comprehensive Income
—Comprehensive income consists of the net income or loss and other gains and losses affecting stockholders’ equity that, under U.S. GAAP, are excluded from net income. Other comprehensive loss as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
consisted of the foreign currency translation adjustment and the unrealized loss, net of tax, on the Company’s cash flow hedge, which expired in June 2015. See Note 8,
Derivative and Other Comprehensive Income.
Stock-Based Compensation
—The Company maintains several equity incentive plans under which it may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock variable compensation or other forms of awards granted or denominated in the Company’s common stock or units of the Company’s common stock, as well as cash variable compensation awards to employees, non-employees, directors, and consultants. The Company also maintains an employee stock purchase plan. See Note 15,
Stock Incentive Plans
, for additional details.
Deferred Compensation (Income) Expense
—The Company has assets and liabilities related to a deferred compensation plan. The assets of the deferred compensation plan are held in a rabbi trust, where they are invested in certain mutual funds that cover an investment spectrum range from equities to money market instruments. Increases in the market value of the investments held in the trust result in the recognition of deferred compensation expense reported in Selling, general, and administrative expenses and recognition of investment gain reported in Interest income and other, net, in the consolidated statements of operations. Decreases in the market value of the investments held in the trust result in the recognition of a reduction to deferred compensation expense and recognition of investment loss reported in Interest income and other, net, in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 16,
Employee Benefit Programs
, for additional details.
Foreign Currency Translation
—The Canadian Dollar is the functional currency for our Canadian restaurant operations. Assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian Dollars are translated into U.S. Dollars at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. Income and expense accounts are translated using the average exchange rates prevailing throughout the period. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a separate component of Other comprehensive income (loss). Gain or loss from foreign currency transactions is recognized in our consolidated statements of operations.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB issued Update 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“Topic 606”), subsequently amended by various standard updates. This guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, this guidance expands related disclosure requirements. The Company will adopt Topic 606 in our first quarter of 2018 and apply the guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented. Revenue recognition related to our restaurant revenue and other revenue, such as gift card breakage, will remain unchanged. Topic 606 will impact the accounting treatment of the Company’s advertising contribution funds, and the Company’s financial statements, as outlined below.
Under Red Robin franchise agreements, the Company and its franchisees are required to contribute a certain percentage of revenues to
two
national media advertising funds. The Company’s national advertising services are provided on a system-wide basis and, therefore, not considered distinct performance obligations with individual franchisees. The Company currently records the advertising contributions from franchisees as a reduction to advertising expense under Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Upon adoption of Topic 606, the Company will recognize these sales-based advertising contributions from franchisees as Franchise royalties and fees when the underlying franchisee sales occur. The Company will record the related advertising expenses as incurred under Selling, general, and administrative expenses. When an advertising fund is over-spent at year end, advertising expenses will be reported on the consolidated statement of operations in an amount that is greater than the revenue recorded for advertising contributions. Conversely, when an advertising fund is under-spent at year end, the Company will accrue advertising costs up to advertising contributions recorded in revenue. Adoption of Topic 606 is not expected to impact the Company’s income taxes.
Adoption of the new revenue recognition standard is expected to impact our consolidated statements of operations as follows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
||||||||||||
|
As reported
|
Adjustments
|
As adjusted
|
||||||||||
|
Franchise royalties and fees
(1)
|
$
|
11,044
|
|
$
|
6,637
|
|
$
|
17,681
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
150,019
|
|
6,637
|
|
156,656
|
|
||||||
48
|
Year Ended December 25, 2016
|
||||||||||||
|
As reported
|
Adjustments
|
As adjusted
|
||||||||||
|
Franchise royalties and fees
(1)
|
$
|
11,209
|
|
$
|
6,746
|
|
$
|
17,955
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
137,887
|
|
6,746
|
|
144,633
|
|
||||||
___________________________________
(1) Effective in our 2018 consolidated statements of operations, Franchise royalties and fees will be renamed as Franchise revenue to capture all types of franchise related revenues earned by the Company.
The new revenue recognition standard is not expected to impact our consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of cash flows.
Leases
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Update 2016-02,
Leases
(“Topic 842”). This guidance requires the recognition of liabilities for lease obligations and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 using a modified retrospective adoption method. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance beginning with its fiscal first quarter 2019. The Company selected and began implementing a new lease management system during 2017. Once the transition to the new system is completed in 2018, this software will enable us to quantify the full impact Topic 842 will have on our consolidated financial statements. We expect adoption of Topic 842 will result in a significant increase in the assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
3. Other Charges
Other charges consist of the following (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||||
|
Asset impairment and restaurant closure costs
|
$
|
6,914
|
|
$
|
34,426
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|||
|
Litigation contingencies
|
—
|
|
3,900
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Reorganization costs
|
—
|
|
1,322
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Other charges
|
$
|
6,914
|
|
$
|
39,648
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|||
Asset Impairment and Restaurant Closure Costs
For fiscal years
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, asset impairment and restaurant closure costs consisted of the following:
Restaurant Impairment
. During
2017
, the Company determined
13
Company-owned restaurants were impaired and recognized a non-cash impairment charge of
$6.9 million
. During
2016
and
2015
, the Company impaired long-lived assets of
19
and
two
Company-owned restaurants, and recognized non-cash impairment charges of
$24.4 million
and
$0.6 million
.
The Company recognized the impairment charges resulting from the continuing and projected future results of these restaurants, primarily through projected cash flows. The fair value measurement for asset impairment is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a level 3 fair value measurement. Each restaurant’s past and present operating performance was reviewed in combination with projected future results, primarily through projected undiscounted cash flows. The Company compared the carrying amount of each restaurant’s assets to its fair value as estimated by management. The fair value of the long-lived assets is generally determined using a discounted cash flow projection model. In certain cases, management uses other market information, when available, to estimate the fair value of a restaurant. The impairment charges represent the excess of each restaurant’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value.
The Company recognized a
$0.8 million
asset impairment charge due to the relocation of a restaurant during 2016.
49
Impairment of Software
. During the fourth quarter of
2016
, the Company determined certain software related to its Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system would be obsolete upon migration to a cloud-based ERP system in 2017. The Company also determined certain software in development for supply chain management would not meet the Company’s requirements if it were implemented. As a result, the Company recorded a
$2.5 million
impairment charge to write down the capitalized costs associated with this software.
Restaurant Closures
. During 2017, the Company closed
two
Red Robin restaurants at the end of their lease terms and closed
one
Red Robin restaurant that was underperforming relative to Company expectations. The related restaurant closure costs were immaterial.
During 2016, the Company closed
nine
Red Robin Burger Works restaurants, a smaller non-traditional prototype with a limited menu and limited service, that were underperforming relative to Company expectations and recognized
$6.7 million
of restaurant closure costs, which comprised
$3.7 million
in fixed asset disposal costs;
$2.7 million
in charges related to future lease obligations and contract termination costs; and immaterial termination benefits, inventory write off costs, and other closure-related costs.
During 2016, the Company closed
two
Red Robin restaurants at the end of their lease terms, closed
one
Red Robin restaurant and sold the property for an immaterial loss, and temporarily closed
one
Red Robin restaurant which reopened in 2017. During 2015, the Company closed
one
Red Robin restaurant at the end of its lease term. The related restaurant closure costs were immaterial.
The Company evaluates restaurants that are sold or closed and allocates goodwill based on the relative fair value of the disposal restaurants to the Company’s reporting unit. Since restaurant operations are typically valued based on cash flow from operations, the Company compares the historical cash flow from the closed restaurants to the cash flow from the reporting unit to determine the relative value. The goodwill allocated to the restaurants closed in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
was immaterial.
Litigation Contingencies
In 2016, the Company recorded
$3.9 million
of litigation contingencies for employment-related claims. Refer to Note 12,
Commitments and Contingencies
.
Reorganization Costs
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company recorded
$1.3 million
of severance costs related to Company reorganization in the U.S. and Canada.
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following at
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
41,850
|
|
$
|
41,266
|
|
||
|
Buildings
|
111,205
|
|
107,435
|
|
||||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
721,369
|
|
693,258
|
|
||||
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
385,227
|
|
360,749
|
|
||||
|
Construction in progress
|
18,639
|
|
26,240
|
|
||||
|
1,278,290
|
|
1,228,948
|
|
|||||
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(640,139
|
)
|
(572,509
|
)
|
||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
638,151
|
|
$
|
656,439
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment, including assets under capital lease, was
$87.6 million
in
2017
,
$81.6 million
in
2016
, and
$72.6 million
in
2015
.
50
5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table presents goodwill as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands).
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
95,935
|
|
$
|
81,957
|
|
||
|
Acquisition
|
—
|
|
13,679
|
|
||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
1,044
|
|
299
|
|
||||
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
96,979
|
|
$
|
95,935
|
|
||
The Company recorded
no
goodwill impairment losses in the periods presented in the above table or any prior periods.
The following table presents intangible assets as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Franchise rights
|
$
|
54,447
|
|
$
|
(29,685
|
)
|
$
|
24,762
|
|
$
|
55,902
|
|
$
|
(27,306
|
)
|
$
|
28,596
|
|
||||||
|
Leasehold interests
|
13,001
|
|
(7,459
|
)
|
5,542
|
|
13,931
|
|
(7,400
|
)
|
6,531
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Liquor licenses
|
10,148
|
|
(9,667
|
)
|
481
|
|
10,253
|
|
(9,857
|
)
|
396
|
|
||||||||||||
|
$
|
77,596
|
|
$
|
(46,811
|
)
|
$
|
30,785
|
|
$
|
80,086
|
|
$
|
(44,563
|
)
|
$
|
35,523
|
|
|||||||
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Liquor licenses
|
$
|
7,488
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
7,488
|
|
$
|
6,747
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
6,747
|
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
$
|
85,084
|
|
$
|
(46,811
|
)
|
$
|
38,273
|
|
$
|
86,833
|
|
$
|
(44,563
|
)
|
$
|
42,270
|
|
||||||
No impairment charges were recorded related to indefinite-lived intangibles in
2017
,
2016
, or
2015
. There were immaterial impairments of franchise rights, leasehold interests, and liquor licenses related to the
13
restaurants impaired in
2017
and immaterial impairments of franchise rights and liquor licenses related to the
19
restaurants impaired in
2016
, which are discussed in Note 3,
Other Charges.
There were no other impairments of intangible assets subject to amortization in
2017
,
2016
, or
2015
.
The aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization for
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
was
$4.9 million
,
$5.1 million
, and
$4.7 million
.
The estimated aggregate future amortization expense as of
December 31, 2017
is as follows (in thousands):
|
2018
|
$
|
4,202
|
|
|
2019
|
4,154
|
|
|
|
2020
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
2021
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
2022
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
12,865
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,785
|
|
|
51
6. Accrued Payroll and Payroll-related Liabilities, and Accrued Liabilities and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued payroll and payroll-related liabilities consist of the following at
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||
|
Payroll and payroll-related taxes
|
$
|
10,363
|
|
$
|
17,009
|
|
||
|
Corporate and restaurant incentive compensation
|
8,579
|
|
2,146
|
|
||||
|
Workers compensation insurance
|
6,141
|
|
6,907
|
|
||||
|
Accrued vacation
|
5,581
|
|
5,736
|
|
||||
|
Other
|
2,113
|
|
2,905
|
|
||||
|
$
|
32,777
|
|
$
|
34,703
|
|
|||
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities consist of the following at
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||
|
State and city sales taxes
|
$
|
10,449
|
|
$
|
6,703
|
|
||
|
General liability insurance
|
8,727
|
|
5,667
|
|
||||
|
Real estate, personal property, state income, and other taxes payable
|
3,631
|
|
3,579
|
|
||||
|
Utilities
|
3,042
|
|
2,833
|
|
||||
|
Other
|
10,451
|
|
10,723
|
|
||||
|
$
|
36,300
|
|
$
|
29,505
|
|
|||
7. Borrowings
Borrowings as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
are summarized below (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
|
Borrowings
|
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
|
|||||||||||
|
Revolving credit facility and other long-term debt
|
$
|
266,375
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
$
|
336,375
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
||||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
10,938
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
11,463
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations
|
277,313
|
|
|
|
347,838
|
|
||||||||
|
Less: Current portion
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
||||||
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
$
|
276,572
|
|
|
|
$
|
347,180
|
|
|
|
||||
Maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations as of
December 31, 2017
are as follows (in thousands):
|
2018
|
$
|
741
|
|
|
2019
|
786
|
|
|
|
2020
|
837
|
|
|
|
2021
|
266,391
|
|
|
|
2022
|
762
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
7,796
|
|
|
|
$
|
277,313
|
|
|
On
June 30, 2016
, the Company replaced its existing credit facility with a new credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) with the same group of lenders which provided for a
$400 million
revolving line of credit with a sublimit for the issuance of up to
$25 million
in letters of credit and swingline loans up to
$15 million
, and included an option to increase the amount available under the credit facility up to an additional
$100 million
in the aggregate, subject to the lenders’ participation.
52
The New Credit Facility also provides a Canadian Dollar borrowing sublimit equivalent to
$20 million
. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility, if denominated in U.S. Dollars, are subject to rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a spread based on leverage or a base rate plus a spread based on leverage (base rate is the highest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus
0.50%
, and (c) LIBOR for an Interest Period of one month plus
1%
). Borrowings under the New Credit Facility, if denominated in Canadian Dollars, are subject to rates based on LIBOR plus a spread based on leverage or a base rate plus a spread based on leverage (base rate is the highest of (a) the Canadian Prime Rate and (b) the Canadian Dealer Offered Rate (“CDOR Rate”) for an interest period of one month plus
1%
). On April 13, 2017, the Company entered into a first amendment (the “Amendment”) to the New Credit Facility. The Amendment increased the lease adjusted leverage ratio to
5.25
x through October 1, 2017 before stepping down to
5.0
x through July 15, 2018 and returning to
4.75
x thereafter. The Amendment also provides for additional pricing tiers that increase LIBOR spread rates and commitment fees to the extent the Company’s lease adjusted leverage ratio exceeds
4.75
x, in addition to revising terms for permitted acquisitions and investments under the New Credit Facility. The Amendment is effective through October 7, 2018 and is cancelable at the Company’s discretion.
The New Credit Facility matures on
June 30, 2021
. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility are secured by first priority liens and security interests in substantially all of the Company’s assets, including the capital stock of certain Company subsidiaries, and are available for financing activities including restaurant construction costs, working capital and general corporate purposes, including, among other uses, to refinance certain indebtedness, permitted acquisitions, and redemption of capital stock. As of
December 31, 2017
, the Company had outstanding borrowings under the New Credit Facility of
$265.5 million
, in addition to amounts issued under letters of credit of
$7.6 million
, which reduced the amount available under the credit facility but were not recorded as debt.
Loan origination costs associated with the New Credit Facility were
$1.1 million
and are included as deferred costs in Other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, except for the current portion of these costs which is included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets. In the first quarter of 2017, the Company recorded an additional
$0.7 million
in debt issuance costs related to the Amendment to the New Credit Facility. Unamortized debt issuance costs were
$2.4 million
and
$2.3 million
as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
.
The Company is subject to a number of customary covenants under its New Credit Facility, including limitations on additional borrowings, acquisitions, capital expenditures, share repurchases, lease commitments, dividend payments, and requirements to maintain certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with such covenants as of
December 31, 2017
.
8. Derivative and Other Comprehensive Income
From time to time, the Company enters into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only, including a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge under guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company uses interest rate-related derivative instruments to manage the exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. By using these instruments, the Company exposes itself, from time to time, to both credit and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of either party to the contract to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, creating credit risk for the Company. The Company minimizes credit risk by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties whose credit ratings are evaluated on a quarterly basis. Market risk, as it relates to the Company’s interest-rate derivative, is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument resulting from changes in interest rates. The Company minimizes market risk by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that the Company accepts.
The Company had
no
active derivative financial instruments at
December 31, 2017
or
December 25, 2016
. The Company had
one
interest rate swap that was highly effective during 2015 until it matured on June 30, 2015. The loss on the interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge recognized in other comprehensive loss and reclassifications from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings during 2015 were immaterial.
53
9. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value measurements are made under a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the measuring of fair value:
|
Level 1:
|
Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
|
|
Level 2:
|
Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
|
|
Level 3:
|
Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, and accounts payables approximate fair value due to the short term nature or maturity of the instruments.
The Company maintains a rabbi trust to fund obligations under a deferred compensation plan. See Note 16,
Employee Benefit Programs.
Amounts in the rabbi trust are invested in mutual funds, which are designated as trading securities and carried at fair value, and are included in Other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Fair market value of mutual funds is measured using level 1 inputs (quoted prices for identical assets in active markets). The value of the deferred compensation plan liability is dependent upon the fair value of the assets held in the rabbi trust and therefore is not measured at fair value.
The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands):
|
December 31, 2017
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Investments in rabbi trust
|
$
|
9,292
|
|
$
|
9,292
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
9,292
|
|
$
|
9,292
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
December 25, 2016
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Investments in rabbi trust
|
$
|
9,165
|
|
$
|
9,165
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
9,165
|
|
$
|
9,165
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on the consolidated financial statements on a nonrecurring basis include items such as property, plant and equipment, goodwill, and other intangible assets. These assets are measured at fair value if determined to be impaired.
Other than as disclosed in Note 3,
Other Charges
, as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
, the Company had no non-financial assets or liabilities that were measured using level 3 inputs.
Disclosures of Fair Value of Other Assets and Liabilities
The Company’s liabilities under its credit facility and capital leases are carried at historical cost in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Both the credit facility and the Company’s capital lease obligations are considered to be Level 2 instruments. The carrying value of the credit facility approximates fair value as the interest rate on this instrument approximates current market rates. For disclosure purposes, the Company estimated the fair value of the capital lease obligations using discounted cash flow analysis based on market rates obtained from independent third parties for similar types of debt.
54
The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Company’s capital lease obligations as of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands):
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 25, 2016
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Carrying Value
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
Carrying Value
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
$
|
10,938
|
|
$
|
11,563
|
|
$
|
11,463
|
|
$
|
12,917
|
|
||||
10. Supplemental Disclosures to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
(In thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||||
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
||||||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
$
|
3,999
|
|
$
|
4,651
|
|
$
|
14,346
|
|
|||
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
10,372
|
|
6,462
|
|
3,754
|
|
||||||
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Change in construction related payables
|
(5,951
|
)
|
(15,830
|
)
|
13,040
|
|
||||||
|
Capital lease obligations incurred for real estate and equipment purchases
|
140
|
|
4,133
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
11. Income Taxes
Income before income taxes includes the following components for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
(in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||||
|
U.S.
|
$
|
32,208
|
|
$
|
7,806
|
|
$
|
64,668
|
|
|||
|
Foreign
|
(3,188
|
)
|
(3,018
|
)
|
(1,432
|
)
|
||||||
|
$
|
29,020
|
|
$
|
4,788
|
|
$
|
63,236
|
|
||||
The (benefit) provision for income taxes for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
consist of the following (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||||
|
Current:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
2,304
|
|
$
|
2,503
|
|
$
|
6,427
|
|
|||
|
State
|
3,175
|
|
2,078
|
|
4,455
|
|
||||||
|
Foreign
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Deferred:
|
||||||||||||
|
Federal
|
(6,045
|
)
|
(9,407
|
)
|
4,013
|
|
||||||
|
State
|
(680
|
)
|
(2,300
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
||||||
|
Foreign
|
247
|
|
189
|
|
638
|
|
||||||
|
$
|
(999
|
)
|
$
|
(6,937
|
)
|
$
|
15,532
|
|
||||
55
The reconciliation between the income tax provision and the amount of income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate to income before the provision for income taxes as shown in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
is as follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||
|
Tax provision at U.S. federal statutory rate
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
|||
|
State income taxes
|
5.0
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
4.3
|
|
|||
|
FICA tip tax credits
|
(32.4
|
)
|
(183.8
|
)
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|||
|
Foreign taxes versus U.S statutory rate
|
0.7
|
|
6.7
|
|
0.3
|
|
|||
|
Valuation allowance on deferred income tax assets
|
4.5
|
|
19.3
|
|
1.5
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax remeasurement due to the Tax Act
|
(9.7
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Other tax credits
|
(6.5
|
)
|
(27.7
|
)
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|||
|
Meals and entertainment
|
0.9
|
|
6.6
|
|
0.6
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
(1.0
|
)
|
2.0
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|||
|
Effective tax rate
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
(144.9
|
)%
|
24.6
|
%
|
|||
The increase in the Company’s effective tax rate in
2017
is primarily attributable to the increase in earnings before income tax, partially offset by an increase in the FICA tip tax credit. In addition, on December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. We have recorded a decrease related to our deferred tax liabilities with a corresponding adjustment to deferred tax benefit. The decrease in the Company’s effective tax rate in
2016
from
2015
was primarily attributable to the decrease in earnings before income tax as well as an increase in the FICA tip tax credit.
The Company’s federal and state deferred taxes at
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
are as follows (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||
|
Deferred tax assets and (liabilities), net:
|
||||||||
|
Deferred rent
|
$
|
14,024
|
|
$
|
20,039
|
|
||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
5,267
|
|
7,500
|
|
||||
|
General business and other tax credits
|
18,269
|
|
13,982
|
|
||||
|
Alternative minimum tax credits
|
—
|
|
1,241
|
|
||||
|
Accrued compensation and related costs
|
6,496
|
|
9,431
|
|
||||
|
Advanced payments
|
2,846
|
|
3,809
|
|
||||
|
Other non-current deferred tax assets
|
5,250
|
|
4,696
|
|
||||
|
Other non-current deferred tax liabilities
|
(2,013
|
)
|
(2,790
|
)
|
||||
|
Goodwill
|
(9,850
|
)
|
(12,004
|
)
|
||||
|
Property and equipment
|
(8,027
|
)
|
(16,459
|
)
|
||||
|
Franchise rights
|
(23
|
)
|
(840
|
)
|
||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
(4,157
|
)
|
(6,046
|
)
|
||||
|
Supplies inventory
|
(5,150
|
)
|
(7,495
|
)
|
||||
|
Subtotal
|
22,932
|
|
15,064
|
|
||||
|
Valuation Allowance
|
(3,742
|
)
|
(2,323
|
)
|
||||
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
19,190
|
|
12,741
|
|
||||
|
Non-current deferred tax asset
|
19,932
|
|
13,206
|
|
||||
|
Non-current deferred tax liability
|
(742
|
)
|
(465
|
)
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
19,190
|
|
$
|
12,741
|
|
||
Realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent upon profitable operations and future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. Based on the Company’s evaluation of its deferred tax assets, as of
December 31, 2017
, a valuation allowance of approximately
$3.7 million
has been recorded against the deferred tax asset for state income tax credits and the deferred taxes of our foreign subsidiary, including the net operating loss carry forward, in order to measure only the portion of the deferred tax assets that more likely than not will be realized. However, the amount of the deferred tax assets considered
56
realizable could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carry forward period are increased or reduced or if there are differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. The Company also assessed whether its valuation allowance analyses were affected by various aspects of the Tax Act, and concluded all deferred tax assets, except those already reduced due to a valuation allowance, will continue to be realized.
We do not provide for deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting basis over the tax basis in our investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. We intend to reinvest earnings from our foreign subsidiaries, if any, in those operations for the foreseeable future. We have not, nor do we anticipate the need to, repatriate funds to the U.S. to satisfy domestic liquidity needs and, accordingly, we do not provide for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding tax on these earnings. While we do not expect to repatriate cash to the U.S., if these funds were distributed to the U.S., in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liabilities on these earnings is not practicable because such liability, if any, is dependent on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs. In addition, the international provisions of the Tax Act are not expected to have a material impact on the Company. We will continue to evaluate our estimates during the 12-month measurement period as additional information and regulatory interpretations become available
The Tax Act also repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) for tax years beginning January 1, 2018, and provides that existing AMT credit carryovers are refundable beginning in 2018. The Company has approximately
$1.2 million
of AMT credit carryovers that are expected to be fully refunded between 2018 and 2021.
Pursuant to the guidance for uncertain tax positions, a taxpayer must be able to more likely than not sustain a position to recognize a tax benefit, and the measurement of the benefit is calculated as the largest amount that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon resolution of the benefit. The Company has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The only periods subject to examination for the Company’s federal and state returns are the 2012 through
2017
tax years.
The following table summarizes the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits at
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
(in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||
|
Beginning of year
|
$
|
170
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
||
|
Increase due to current year tax positions
|
172
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Due to decrease to a position taken in a prior year
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Settlements
|
(11
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
||||
|
Reductions related to lapses
|
(42
|
)
|
(46
|
)
|
||||
|
End of year
|
$
|
287
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
||
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is approximately
$0.3 million
. The Company does not anticipate significant changes in the aggregate amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, other than nominal tax settlements.
The Company’s policy for recording interest and penalties associated with audits is to record such items as a component of income before taxes. Penalties are recorded in Interest income and other, net, and interest paid or received is recorded in Interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded immaterial interest expense on the identified tax liabilities in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, and no penalties were recorded in those fiscal years.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Leasing Activities
—The Company leases land, buildings, and equipment used in its operations under operating leases. The Company’s operating leases have remaining non-cancelable terms ranging from less than
one
year to more than
15
years. These leases generally contain renewal options which permit the Company to renew the leases at defined contractual rates or prevailing market rates. Certain equipment leases also include options to purchase equipment at the end of the lease term. Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are determined as a percentage of adjusted restaurant sales in excess of specified levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability and the corresponding rent expense when specified levels have been achieved or when management determines that achieving the specified levels during the fiscal year is probable. Certain lease agreements also require the Company to pay maintenance, insurance, and property tax costs. Rental expense related to
57
land, building, and equipment leases for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
, which is recorded under Occupancy on the consolidated statements of operations, are as follows (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||||
|
Minimum rent
|
$
|
77,778
|
|
$
|
73,605
|
|
$
|
67,078
|
|
|||
|
Contingent rent
|
1,604
|
|
1,676
|
|
2,264
|
|
||||||
|
Equipment rent under operating leases
|
1,024
|
|
1,052
|
|
791
|
|
||||||
|
$
|
80,406
|
|
$
|
76,333
|
|
$
|
70,133
|
|
||||
The Company leases certain of its owned land, buildings, and equipment to outside parties under non-cancelable operating leases. Rental income was immaterial for
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
.
Future minimum lease commitments under all leases as of
December 31, 2017
are as follows (in thousands):
|
Capital
Leases
|
Operating
Leases
|
|||||||
|
2018
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
$
|
75,613
|
|
||
|
2019
|
1,234
|
|
72,328
|
|
||||
|
2020
|
1,238
|
|
67,568
|
|
||||
|
2021
|
1,240
|
|
61,375
|
|
||||
|
2022
|
1,063
|
|
52,754
|
|
||||
|
Thereafter
|
8,570
|
|
224,517
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
14,579
|
|
$
|
554,155
|
|
|||
|
Less amount representing interest
|
(3,641
|
)
|
|
|
||||
|
Present value of future minimum lease payments
|
10,938
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Less current portion
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
||||
|
Long-term capital lease obligations
|
$
|
10,197
|
|
|
|
|||
At the end of
2017
and
2016
, property and equipment included
$29.9 million
and
$29.3 million
of assets under capital lease, and
$12.3 million
and
$10.5 million
of related accumulated depreciation.
Future minimum rental income is immaterial.
Contingencies
In the normal course of business, there are various claims in process, matters in litigation, and other contingencies. These include claims resulting from “slip and fall” accidents, employment related claims and claims alleging illness, injury, or other food quality, health, or operational issues. Evaluating contingencies related to litigation is a complex process involving subjective judgment on the potential outcome of future events, and the ultimate resolution of litigated claims may differ from our current analysis. We review the adequacy of accruals and disclosures pertaining to litigation matters each quarter and year end in consultation with legal counsel, and we assess the probability and range of possible losses associated with contingencies for potential accrual in the consolidated financial statements. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these other suits, legal proceedings, and claims with certainty, management is of the opinion that adequate provision for potential losses associated with these other matters has been made in the consolidated financial statements.
13. Franchise Operations
Results of franchise operations included in the consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
consist of the following (in thousands):
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||||
|
Franchise royalties and fees:
|
|||||||||||
|
Royalty income
|
$
|
11,019
|
|
$
|
11,196
|
|
$
|
12,478
|
|
||
|
Franchise fees
|
25
|
|
13
|
|
48
|
|
|||||
|
Total franchise royalties and fees
|
$
|
11,044
|
|
$
|
11,209
|
|
$
|
12,526
|
|
||
58
The Company provides management expertise, training, pre-opening assistance, and restaurant operating assistance in exchange for area development fees, franchise fees, license fees, and royalties of
4%
of the franchised restaurant sales pursuant to the franchise agreements. Franchise fee revenue is recognized when all material obligations and initial services to be provided by the Company have been performed, generally upon the opening of the new restaurant. Until earned, these fees are accounted for as deferred revenue. Area development fees are dependent upon the number of restaurants in the territory as well as the Company’s obligations under the area franchise agreement. Consequently, as the Company’s obligations are met, area development fees are recognized proportionately with the opening of each new restaurant. Royalties are accrued as earned and are calculated each period based on the franchisee’s reported adjusted sales.
14. Stockholders’
Equity
On February 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors re-authorized the Company’s share repurchase program and approved the repurchase of up to
$100 million
of the Company’s common stock. This authorization became effective on February 11, 2016, and will terminate upon completing the repurchase of
$100 million
of common stock unless otherwise terminated by the board. Purchases under the repurchase program may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Purchases may be made from time to time at the Company’s discretion and the timing and amount of any share repurchases will be determined based on share price, market conditions, legal requirements, and other factors. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the Company may suspend or discontinue the repurchase program at any time. The Company did not repurchase any shares during 2017. Since February 11, 2016, the Company has purchased
940,034
shares under this authorization with an average purchase price of
$49.02
per share for a total of
$46.1 million
.
On February 11, 2015, the Company’s board of directors authorized a repurchase of up to
$100 million
of the Company’s common stock. In 2015, the Company repurchased
556,049
shares under this authorization, with an average purchase price of
$71.93
per share for a total of
$40.0 million
.
15. Stock Incentive Plans
In May 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2017 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2017 Stock Plan”). Following the date of approval, all grants are made under the 2017 Stock Plan and no new awards may be granted under the Second Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Plan (the “2007 Stock Plan”). The 2017 Stock Plan authorizes the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), and other forms of awards granted or denominated in our common stock or unit of our common stock, as well as cash performance awards pursuant to the plan. Persons eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Stock Plan include officers, employees, directors, consultants, and other service providers or any affiliate of the Company. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued or transferred pursuant to awards under the 2017 Stock Plan is
630,182
shares.
Vesting of the awards under the 2017 Stock Plan is determined at the date of grant by the plan administrator. Each award granted under the 2017 Stock Plan and 2007 Stock Plan fully vests, becomes exercisable and/or payable, as applicable, upon a change in control event. However, unless the individual award agreement provides otherwise, with respect to executive and certain other high level officers of the Company, upon the occurrence of a change in control, no award will vest unless such officers’ employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without cause during the
two
-year period following such change in control event. Each award expires on such date as shall be determined at the date of grant; however, the maximum term of options, SARs, and other rights to acquire common stock under the plan is
ten
years after the initial date of the award, subject to provisions for further deferred payment in certain circumstances. As of
December 31, 2017
,
468,657
options to acquire the Company’s common stock remained outstanding under the 2007 Stock Plan.
Total stock-based compensation costs recognized in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
were
$4.8 million
,
$4.5 million
, and
$4.7 million
, with related income tax benefits of
$1.5 million
,
$0.4 million
, and
$2.0 million
. As of
December 31, 2017
, there was
$4.9 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost, excluding estimated forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of approximately
1.4
years for stock options,
1.3
years for the restricted stock units, and
2.0
years for the performance stock units.
59
Stock Options
The tables below summarize the status of the Company’s stock option plans (in thousands, except per share data and exercise price):
|
Stock Options
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
||||||
|
Outstanding, December 25, 2016
|
408
|
|
$
|
53.82
|
|
||
|
Granted
|
145
|
|
48.07
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited/expired
|
(20
|
)
|
53.32
|
|
|||
|
Exercised
|
(64
|
)
|
35.36
|
|
|||
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2017
|
469
|
|
$
|
54.60
|
|
||
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Years of
Contractual
Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017
|
469
|
|
$
|
54.60
|
|
7.24
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
||||
|
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2017
(1)
|
427
|
|
$
|
54.89
|
|
7.08
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
||||
|
Exercisable as of December 31, 2017
|
200
|
|
$
|
51.99
|
|
5.53
|
$
|
2,250
|
|
||||
___________________________________
(1) The expected to vest options are the result of applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumption to total outstanding options. The Company applies estimated forfeiture rates that are derived from our historical forfeitures of similar awards.
The estimated fair value of each option granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes multiple option-pricing model. The average assumptions used in the model for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2017
,
December 25, 2016
, and
December 27, 2015
were as follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||||||||
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.8
|
|
%
|
1.2
|
|
%
|
1.4
|
|
%
|
||||||
|
Expected years until exercise
|
5.0
|
|
4.5
|
|
4.8
|
|
|||||||||
|
Expected stock volatility
|
37.9
|
|
%
|
39.0
|
|
%
|
40.6
|
|
%
|
||||||
|
Dividend yield
|
—
|
|
%
|
—
|
|
%
|
—
|
|
%
|
||||||
|
Weighted average Black-Scholes fair value per share at date of grant
|
$
|
17.11
|
|
$
|
20.45
|
|
$
|
29.71
|
|
||||||
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands)
|
$
|
1,676
|
|
$
|
2,624
|
|
$
|
4,414
|
|
||||||
The risk-free interest rate was based on the rate for zero coupon U.S. Government issues with a remaining term similar to the expected life. The expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and is based on historical trends and team member exercise patterns. The expected stock price volatility represents an average of the Company’s historical volatility measured over a period approximating the expected life. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectations of dividend payouts.
Time-Based RSUs
During
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
, the Company issued time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain employees as permitted under the 2017 and 2007 Stock Plans. The Company can grant RSUs to its directors, executive officers and other key employees. The RSUs granted to employees typically vest in equal installments over
four
years. For the Company’s board of directors, RSUs vest in full on the
one
-year anniversary date of the grant date. Upon vesting,
one
share of the Company’s common stock is issued for each RSU. The fair value of each RSU granted is equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant.
60
The table below summarizes the status of the Company’s time-based RSUs under the 2017 and 2007 Stock Plans (shares in thousands):
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value (per share)
|
||||||
|
Outstanding, December 25, 2016
|
82
|
|
$
|
61.16
|
|
||
|
Awarded
|
74
|
|
53.13
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
(10
|
)
|
56.38
|
|
|||
|
Vested
|
(44
|
)
|
57.21
|
|
|||
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2017
|
102
|
|
$
|
57.51
|
|
||
Performance Stock Units
During 2017, the Company granted performance stock unit awards (“PSUs”) to certain employees as permitted under the 2017 Stock Plan. Each PSU represents the right to receive
one
share of the Company’s common stock on the payment date, subject to the achievement of the applicable performance goals at target and applicable vesting conditions. Each PSU is divided into three equal tranches with applicable performance periods, typically consisting of an annual fiscal year. PSUs remain unvested until the last day of the third performance period and are forfeited in the event of termination of employment of a grantee prior to the last day of the third performance period.
The table below summarizes the status of the Company’s performance stock units under the 2017 Stock Plan (shares in thousands):
|
Performance Stock Units
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value (per share)
|
||||||
|
Outstanding, December 25, 2016
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Awarded
|
30
|
|
48.87
|
|
|||
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Vested
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2017
|
30
|
|
$
|
48.87
|
|
||
Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan
Beginning in 2017, the long-term cash incentive plan is based on operational metrics with three one-year performance periods. Prior to 2017, the long-term cash incentive plan was based on operational metrics with a
three
-year performance period. Compensation expense is recognized over the performance period based on the plan-to-date performance achievement. The awards cliff vest at the end of each
three
-year performance cycle. In
2017
, the Company recorded
$0.4 million
in compensation expenses related to the 2017 long-term cash incentive plan. In
2016
, the Company reversed
$2.3 million
of its long-term cash incentive plan liability upon determining that certain performance metrics were not probable of being achieved. In
2015
, the Company recorded
$3.3 million
in compensation expenses related to this program.
In
2017
, the Company paid out
$0.7 million
cash awards related to achievement of the performance metrics of the
2014
long-term cash incentive plan. In
2016
, the Company paid out
$3.4 million
cash awards related to achievement of the performance metrics of the 2013 long-term cash incentive plan. In
2015
, the Company paid out
$1.8 million
cash awards related to achievement of the performance metrics of the 2012 long-term cash incentive plan. At
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
, a
$0.4 million
and
$0.7 million
long-term cash incentive plan liability was included in Accrued payroll and payroll-related liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
16. Employee Benefit Programs
Employee Deferred Compensation Plan
—In 2003, the Company adopted a deferred compensation plan that permits key employees and other members of management not eligible to participate in the Employee Defined Contribution Plan to defer portions of their compensation. Under this plan, eligible team members may elect to defer up to
75%
of their base salary and up to
100%
of variable compensation and commissions each plan year. The Company may make matching contributions in an amount determined by the board of directors. In 2016, the board of directors authorized matching contributions equal to
50%
61
of the first
4%
of compensation that is deferred by the participant, an increase from the previous matching contributions equal to
25%
of the first
4%
of compensation deferred by the participant. The Company recognized an immaterial matching contribution expense in
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
.
The assets of the deferred compensation plan are held in a rabbi trust, where they are invested in certain mutual funds that cover an investment spectrum ranging from equities to money market instruments and are available to satisfy the claims of the Company’s creditors in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency. These mutual funds have published market prices and are reported at fair value. See Note 9,
Fair Value Measurements
. Changes in the market value of the investments held in the trust result in the recognition of a corresponding gain or loss reported in Interest income and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. A corresponding change in the liability associated with the deferred compensation plan results in an offsetting deferred compensation expense, or reduction of expense, reported in Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognized deferred compensation expense of
$1.0 million
in
2017
,
$0.6 million
in
2016
, and an immaterial amount in
2015
. As of
December 31, 2017
and
December 25, 2016
,
$9.3 million
and
$9.2 million
of deferred compensation assets is included in Other assets, net and
$9.3 million
and
$9.2 million
of deferred compensation plan liability is included in Other non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
—In July 2017, the Company adopted the Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “New Plan”), which replaced the previous Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Prior Plan”). The New Plan authorized
100,000
shares of the Company’s common stock for issuance. Under the New Plan, eligible team members may voluntarily contribute up to
15%
of their salary, subject to limitations, to purchase common stock at a price equal to
85%
of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the first day of each offering period or
85%
of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the last day of each offering period, whichever amount is less. In general, all of the Company’s officers and team members who have been employed by the Company for at least
one year
and who are regularly scheduled to work more than
20 hours
per week are eligible to participate in this plan which operates in successive
six
month periods commencing on each January 1 and July 1 of each fiscal year. During 2017, the Company issued
17,294
shares under the Prior Plan. The Company has issued a total of
7,607
shares under the New Plan, and a total of
92,393
shares remain available for future issuance.
For
2017
, in accordance with the guidance for accounting for stock compensation, the Company estimated the fair value of the awards granted pursuant to the stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes multiple-option pricing model. The average assumptions used in the model included a
1.05%
risk-free interest rate;
0.5
year expected life; expected volatility of
37.96%
; and a
0%
dividend yield. The weighted average fair value per share at grant date was
$11.16
. For
2016
, the average assumptions used in the model included a
0.55%
risk-free interest rate,
0.5
year expected life, expected volatility of
37.64%
, and a
0%
dividend yield. The weighted average fair value per share at grant date was
$9.29
. The Company recognized
$0.2 million
of compensation expense related to this plan in each of fiscal years
2017
,
2016
, and
2015
.
Employee Defined Contribution Plan
—The Company maintains a 401(k) Savings Plan (“401K Plan”) which covers eligible team members who have satisfied the service requirements and reached
21
years of age. The 401K Plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, allows team members to defer specified percentages of their compensation on a pre-tax basis. The Company may make matching contributions in an amount determined by the board of directors. In addition, the Company may contribute each period, at its discretion, an additional amount from profits. In 2016, the board of directors authorized matching contributions equal to
50%
of the first
4%
of compensation that is deferred by the participant, an increase from the Company’s previous matching contributions equal to
25%
of the first
4%
of compensation deferred by the participant. The Company recognized matching contribution expense of
$0.7 million
in
2017
,
$0.6 million
in
2016
, and
$0.3 million
in
2015
.
62
17. Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)
The following tables summarize the unaudited consolidated quarterly financial information for fiscal years
2017
and
2016
(in thousands, except per share data):
|
2017
|
Q1
(16 weeks) |
Q2 (1)
(12 weeks) |
Q3
(12 weeks) |
Q4 (2)
(13 weeks) |
2017
(53 weeks) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
418,557
|
|
$
|
315,771
|
|
$
|
304,248
|
|
$
|
342,353
|
|
$
|
1,380,929
|
|
|||||
|
Income from operations
|
$
|
17,458
|
|
$
|
9,366
|
|
$
|
4,056
|
|
$
|
8,152
|
|
$
|
39,032
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
11,567
|
|
$
|
6,931
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
$
|
8,807
|
|
$
|
30,019
|
|
|||||
|
Basic earnings per share
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|||||
|
2016
|
Q1 (3)
(16 weeks) |
Q2 (4)
(12 weeks) |
Q3 (5)
(12 weeks) |
Q4 (6)
(12 weeks) |
2016
(52 weeks) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
402,126
|
|
$
|
305,549
|
|
$
|
297,307
|
|
$
|
291,459
|
|
$
|
1,296,441
|
|
|||||
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
$
|
20,175
|
|
$
|
10,415
|
|
$
|
(4,235
|
)
|
$
|
(14,785
|
)
|
$
|
11,570
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
14,225
|
|
$
|
7,552
|
|
$
|
(1,300
|
)
|
$
|
(8,752
|
)
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
|||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|||||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|||||
___________________________________
|
(1)
|
During the second quarter of 2017,
five
Company-owned restaurants were impaired. The Company recognized a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of
$1.6 million
for these restaurants.
|
|
(2)
|
During the fourth quarter of 2017,
eight
Company-owned restaurants were impaired. The Company recognized a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of
$5.3 million
for these restaurants.
|
|
(3)
|
During the first quarter of 2016, the Company recognized a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of
$0.8 million
due to the relocation of a restaurant.
|
|
(4)
|
During the second quarter of 2016,
six
Company-owned restaurants were impaired. The Company recognized a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of
$3.9 million
for these restaurants.
|
|
(5)
|
During the third quarter of 2016,
two
Company-owned restaurants were impaired. The Company recognized a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of
$3.8 million
for these restaurants. The Company also recorded
$5.5 million
in restaurant closure costs related to the closure of
nine
Red Robin Burger Works restaurants.
|
|
(6)
|
During the fourth quarter of 2016,
sixteen
Company-owned restaurants, including
five
restaurants previously impaired during 2016, were impaired. In addition, the Company determined that certain software related to the Company’s ERP system and software in development for supply chain management were impaired. The Company recognized a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of
$19.3 million
for these restaurants and software. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company also recorded
$1.2 million
in additional restaurant closure costs related to the Burger Works closures in the third quarter of 2016.
|
None.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of such period, are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act are:
63
|
•
|
Recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and
|
|
•
|
Accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Those rules define internal control over financial reporting as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
|
•
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
|
|
•
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
|
|
•
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or disposition of the company
’
s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company
’
s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017
. In making this assessment, the Company
’
s management used the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that, as of
December 31, 2017
, the Company
’
s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
KPMG, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Company
’
s internal control over financial reporting included herein.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Controls
A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and misstatements are prevented or detected. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
64
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Stockholders and Board of Directors
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.’s and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and December 25, 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 27, 2018
65
None.
Our board of directors has adopted codes of ethics that apply to all of our directors, officers, and employees, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and all of the finance team. The full text of our codes of ethics can be found on the investor relations page of our website at
www.redrobin.com
. We intend to disclose any changes in or waivers from the codes of ethics by posting such information on our corporate website or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual stockholders
’
meeting and is incorporated by reference in this report. Certain information concerning our executive officers is included in Item 1 of Part I of this report and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual stockholders
’
meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this report.
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual stockholders
’
meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this report.
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual stockholders
’
meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this report.
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2018 annual stockholders
’
meeting and is hereby incorporated by reference in this report.
66
|
(a)
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
(1)
|
Our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. - Index” for more detail.
|
|
(2)
|
All financial schedules have been omitted either because they are not applicable or because the required information is provided in our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
(3)
|
Index to Exhibits
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
67
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
68
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
69
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
|
( )
|
Exhibits previously filed in the Company’s periodic filings as specifically noted.
|
|
*
|
Executive compensation plans and arrangements.
|
70
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
||||
|
February 27, 2018
|
By:
|
/s/ DENNY MARIE POST
|
||
|
(Date)
|
Denny Marie Post
(Chief Executive Officer)
|
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DENNY MARIE POST
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Director)
|
|
February 27, 2018
|
|
Denny Marie Post
|
||||
|
/s/ GUY J. CONSTANT
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 27, 2018
|
|
Guy J. Constant
|
||||
|
/s/ PATTYE L. MOORE
|
|
Chairperson of the Board
|
|
February 27, 2018
|
|
Pattye L. Moore
|
||||
|
/s/ CAMMIE W. DUNAWAY
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2018
|
|
Cammie W. Dunaway
|
||||
|
/s/ RICHARD J. HOWELL
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2018
|
|
Richard J. Howell
|
||||
|
/s/ GLENN B. KAUFMAN
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2018
|
|
Glenn B. Kaufman
|
||||
|
/s/ STUART I. ORAN
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2018
|
|
Stuart I. Oran
|
||||
|
/s/ KALEN F. HOLMES
|
Director
|
February 27, 2018
|
||
|
Kalen F. Holmes
|
||||
|
/s/ STEVEN K. LUMPKIN
|
Director
|
February 27, 2018
|
||
|
Steven K. Lumpkin
|
||||
71
QuickLinks
72
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For The Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 5. Market For The RegistrantItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7. ManagementItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules