SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS LLC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE NO. 000-50253
|
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
South Dakota
|
|
46-0462968
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
100 Caspian Avenue; PO Box 500
Volga, South Dakota
|
57071
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
(605) 627-9240
|
|
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (b) OF THE ACT:
NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (g) OF THE ACT:
CLASS A CAPITAL UNITS
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
¨
Yes
x
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
¨
Yes
x
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
¨
Large Accelerated Filer
|
¨
Accelerated Filer
|
x
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
¨
Smaller Reporting Company
|
|
|
|
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
¨
Yes
x
No
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Class A units held by non-affiliates at June 30,
2015
was approximately
$87,895,988
computed by reference to the most recent public offering price on Form S-1. The registrant's Class A units are not listed on an exchange or otherwise publicly traded. Additionally, the Class A units are subject to significant restrictions on transfer under the registrant's operating agreement.
As of the day of this filing, there were 30,419,000 Class A capital units of the registrant outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of Form 10-K - Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the registrant's fiscal year (
December 31, 2015
).
1
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports issued by South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (including reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”), contain “forward-looking statements” that deal with future results, expectations, plans and performance. Forward-looking statements may include statements which use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “predict,” “hope,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “future,” “potential,” or the negatives of these words, and all similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are made based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any responsibility to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to take into account events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report. Additionally, we do not undertake any responsibility to update you on the occurrence of any unanticipated events which may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. As stated elsewhere in this report such factors include, among others:
|
•
|
Changes in the weather or general economic conditions impacting the availability and price of soybeans and natural gas;
|
|
•
|
Global, national and regional agricultural, economic, financial and commodities market, political, social, and health conditions;
|
|
•
|
Fluctuations in U.S. oil consumption and petroleum prices;
|
|
•
|
Changes in perception of food quality and safety;
|
|
•
|
Damage to or loss of our facilities due to casualty, weather, mechanical failure or any extended or extraordinary maintenance or inspection that may be required;
|
|
•
|
Changes in business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;
|
|
•
|
Changes in the availability of credit and interest rates;
|
|
•
|
The availability of additional capital to support capital improvements, development and projects; and
|
|
•
|
Other factors discussed under the item below entitled “Risk Factors.”
|
We are not under any duty to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report. We cannot guarantee future results or performance or what future business conditions will be like. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.
Overview
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (“we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) owns and operates a soybean processing plant and a soybean oil refinery in Volga, South Dakota. We also own and operate an oilseed processing plant located approximately five miles east of Miller, South Dakota, which we purchased on December 19, 2014 and have been operating since April 30, 2015. We are owned by approximately 2,200 members, most of whom reside in South Dakota and neighboring states and many of whom deliver and sell soybeans to our plant for processing.
Our core business consists of processing locally grown soybeans into soybean meal and soybean oil. Approximately 80% of a bushel of soybeans (60 pounds) is processed into soybean meal or hulls, and the remaining 20% is extracted as oil. We sell the soybean meal primarily to resellers, feed mills, and livestock producers as livestock feed. We market and sell multiple grades of soybean oil in either crude or refined format. Crude and refined soybean oil are marketed and sold to the food, biodiesel and chemical industries. Under certain market conditions, we may register and deliver warehouse receipts for crude oil according to the terms and conditions of a Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) soybean oil futures contract.
2
We strive to maintain a competitive position in the marketplace by producing high quality products, operating a highly efficient operation at the lowest possible cost, and adding value to our core products to capture larger margins. We continue to search for ways to improve our efficiencies by analyzing new methods of vertical integration, adding value to our products by investing in further processing of our products, and reviewing new applications for our products in the plastics and energy fields. While it is our objective to maximize the issuance of cash distributions to our members from profits generated through operations, we recognize the need to maintain our financial strength by reinvesting for our future.
General Development of Business
We were originally organized as a South Dakota cooperative in 1993. As a South Dakota cooperative, we were entitled to single-level, pass-through tax treatment on income generated through our members’ patronage. This allowed us to pass our income onto our members in the form of distributions without first paying taxes at the company level, similar to a partnership. As we grew, however, the continuing availability of this advantageous tax treatment became less secure. As a result, in 2001 the cooperative’s board of directors approved a plan to reorganize into a South Dakota limited liability company, which became effective on July 1, 2002.
We began producing soybean meal, crude soybean oil, and soybean hulls in late 1996. Since then we have made significant capital improvements and expanded our business to include the development of vertically integrated product lines and services. In 2002, we completed the construction of a refining facility and began refining crude soybean oil. In 2003, we acquired ownership and management control of Urethane Soy Systems Company (USSC), a company that produced and sold various soybean oil-based polyurethane products, only to close its operations in December 2011 because of poor financial performance. In May 2011, we completed the construction and start-up of a deodorizer at our facility, which allows us to deodorize refined soybean oil and sell the oil directly to customers in the food industry. In December 2014, we purchased an oilseed processing plant located near Miller, South Dakota, which is approximately 100 miles west of our main facility in Volga. The Miller plant allows us to expand into new markets by allowing us to process identity-preserved soybeans, such as GMO-free and organic.
Industry Information
The soybean processing industry converts soybeans into soybean meal, soybean hulls and soybean oil. A bushel of soybeans typically yields approximately 44 pounds of meal, 4 pounds of hulls, and 11 pounds of crude oil when processed. While the meal and hulls are mostly consumed by animals, food ingredients are the primary end use for the oil. Crude soybean oil is generally refined for use as salad and cooking oil, baking and frying fat, and to a more limited extent, for industrial uses. Increasingly, the sale of soybean oil for human consumption is impacted by the regulation of trans-fat. Trans-fat is created by the hydrogenation process of products such as soybean oil and plant oils. Since 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has required that food processors disclose the level of trans-fatty acids contained in their products. In addition, various local governments in the U.S. have enacted, or are considering enacting, restrictions on the use of trans-fats in restaurants. As a result, many food manufacturers have reduced the amount of hydrogenated soybean oil they include in their products or switched to other oils containing lower amounts of trans-fat.
Soybean production is concentrated in the central U.S., Brazil, Argentina and China. In the 2015 harvest season, the U.S. produced approximately 3.89 billion bushels of soybeans, approximately 1% below last year's record crop, and approximately 37% of estimated world production. The USDA estimates that approximately 51% of soybeans produced in the U.S. are processed domestically, 46% are exported as whole soybeans, and 3% are retained for seed and residual use. Historically, there has been an adequate supply of soybeans produced in South Dakota and upper Midwest for the soybean processing industry. In 2015, farm producers in South Dakota produced 235.1 million bushels of soybeans, ranking it seventh among the top producing states in the U.S. as set forth in the following table:
3
|
State
|
|
Production (bushels)
|
|
Illinois
|
|
531 million
|
|
Iowa
|
|
520 million
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
364 million
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
291 million
|
|
Indiana
|
|
285 million
|
|
Ohio
|
|
240 million
|
|
South Dakota
|
|
235 million
|
|
Missouri
|
|
189 million
|
Soybean processing facilities are generally located close to adequate sources of soybeans and a strong demand for meal to decrease transportation costs. Soybean meal is predominantly consumed by poultry and swine in the U.S. On average, exports of soybean meal account for 20% to 30% of total production.
Soybean oil refineries are also generally located close to soybean processing plants. Oil is shipped throughout the U.S. and for export. The USDA estimates that approximately 64% of domestic oil production is used in food, feed and industrial applications, 25% in biodiesel production, and 11% is exported.
Soybean crushing and refining margins are cyclical, characteristic of a mature, competitive industry. While the price of soybeans may fluctuate substantially from year to year, the prices of meal and oil generally track that of soybeans, although not necessarily on a one-for-one basis; therefore, margins can be variable.
The soybean industry continues diligently to introduce soy-based products as bio-based substitutes for various petroleum-based products. These products include biodiesel, soy ink, lubricants, candles and plastics. Biodiesel, a substitute for standard, petroleum-based diesel fuel, has experienced slow but erratic growth in the U.S. From the late-1990s to 2008, biodiesel experienced steady growth, only to stagnate between 2008 and 2010 due to overcapacity in the industry, price volatility in the petroleum oil market, and volatile input costs. Since 2011, the biodiesel market returned to a growth phase following the expansion of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program and resumption of the biodiesel blenders’ tax credit.
Products & Services
Soybean Processing
We process soybeans at our two crushing plants to extract the soybean oil from the protein and fiber portions of the soybean. Approximately 80% of a soybean bushel is processed and sold as soybean meal or hulls. The remaining percentage of the soybean is extracted as crude soybean oil. The crude soybean oil may be sold directly to customers, or we may process the crude into refined soybean oil for future sale.
Polyurethane
Until December 2011, we produced a bio-based polyol called Soyol
®
which was used in industrial applications for the polyurethane industry. We sold Soyol
®
to USSC, our then wholly-owned subsidiary, which, in turn, marketed and sold Soyol
®
and polyurethane resin systems to customers. In December 2011, we closed USSC's operations because of poor financial performance, ultimately dissolving USSC on December 7, 2012.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
We purchase soybeans for processing from local soybean producers and elevators, of which there has been adequate supply. In 2015, producers in South Dakota grew and harvested approximately 235 million bushels, compared to 230 million in 2014,182 million in 2013, 141 million bushels in 2012, and 150 million bushels in 2011. Of this amount, we processed 29.9 million bushels in 2015, compared to 28.2 million in 2014, 27.2 million in 2013, 26.2 million bushels in 2012, and 24.4 million bushels of soybeans in 2011. We control the flow of soybeans into our facilities with a combination of pricing and contracting options. Threats to our soybean supply include weather, changes in government programs, and competition from other processors and export markets.
4
Utilities
Volga, South Dakota
We use natural gas and electricity to operate the crushing and refining plants in Volga, South Dakota. Natural gas is used in the boilers for processing heat and for drying soybeans. NorthWestern Corporation of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, provides for the delivery of natural gas to us on an interruptible basis. We are at risk to adverse price fluctuations in the natural gas market, but we have the capability to use fuel oil and biofuel as a backup for natural gas if delivery is interrupted or market conditions dictate. We also employ forward contracting to offset some of this risk. Our electricity is supplied by the City of Volga, South Dakota.
Miller, South Dakota
We use electricity to operate the mechanical press plant in Miller, South Dakota, as natural gas distribution lines are not located in the area. Our electricity is provided by NorthWestern Corporation of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Employees
We currently employ approximately 108 individuals, all but six of whom are full-time. We have no unions or other collective bargaining agreements.
Sales, Marketing and Customers
Our soybean meal is primarily sold to resellers, feed mills, and livestock producers as livestock feed. The meal is primarily sold to customers in the local area (typically within 200 miles of our Volga facility), Western U.S., and Canada. Prior to the addition of our deodorizer in March 2011, we sold our oil primarily as crude soybean oil to various companies in the refining industry which typically process the oil for human consumption. Following the installation of the deodorizer in March 2011, we began selling refined oil directly to the food industry for human consumption and to the biodiesel industry.
The table presented below represents the percentage of sales by quantity of product sold within various markets for 2015.
|
Market
|
Soybean
Meal
|
Crude
Soybean
Oil
|
Refined
Oil
|
|||
|
Local
|
40%
|
20%
|
28%
|
|||
|
Other U.S. States
|
34%
|
80%
|
67%
|
|||
|
Export
|
26%
|
—
|
5%
|
|||
Over half of our products are shipped by rail, the service of which is provided by the Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern (RCP&E) rail line, with connections to the Burlington-Northern Santa Fe, Canadian Pacific (CP), and the Union Pacific rail lines. On June 1, 2014, our rail line was sold by CP to RCP&E, which is owned and operated by Genesee & Wyoming, Inc.
All of our assets and operations are domiciled in the U.S., and all of the products sold are produced in the U.S.
Dependence upon a Single Customer
None.
Competition
We are in direct competition with several other soybean processing companies in the U.S., many of which have significantly greater resources than we do. The U.S. soybean processing industry is comprised primarily of 16 different companies operating 63 plants in the U.S. It is a mature, consolidated and vertically-integrated industry with four companies controlling nearly 84% of the processing industry. Those four companies are Archer Daniels Midland (ADM),
5
Bunge, Cargill and Ag Processing (AGP). The U.S. vegetable oil (including soybean oil) refining industry is divided between oilseed processors and independent vegetable oil refiners. The oilseed processors operate approximately 83% of the vegetable oil refining capacity in the U.S., and ADM, Bunge, Cargill and AGP operate approximately 68% of the oil refining capacity. The three largest independent vegetable oil refiners are ACH Foods (in joint venture with ADM), Smuckers (Proctor & Gamble), and ConAgra (Hunt-Wesson).
We currently operate the only soybean processing plants in South Dakota. AGP, however, recently announced plans to build another plant in northeast South Dakota. We believe that our processing facilities represent approximately 7% of the total soybean processing capacity in the upper Midwest and about 1.3% in the U.S. We plan to maintain our competitive position in the market by producing high quality products and operating highly efficient operations at the lowest possible cost, and adding value to our products. In May 2011 we completed construction of a soybean oil deodorizer. The deodorization unit allows us to further refine the soybean oil into a fully-refined salad oil. This gives us a greatly expanded customer base to which to market the oil, increasing our competitive position in the processing industry.
Government Regulation and Environmental Matters
Our business is subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment which are administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to the environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes; and the labeling of pesticides and similar substances. Our business is also subject to laws and related regulations and rules administered by other federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies that govern the processing, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality and safety of feed and grain products. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products.
Available Information
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are filed with the SEC. These reports and other information filed by us with the SEC are available on the SEC website (www.sec.gov). The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy, and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The contents of these websites are not incorporated into this filing. Our website is at
www.sdsbp.com
.
We are affected by changes in commodity prices.
Our revenues, earnings and cash flows are affected by market prices for commodities such as crude petroleum oil, natural gas, soybeans, and crude and refined vegetable oils. Commodity prices generally are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including weather, disease, insect damage, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulation and policies, and general political and economic conditions. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of nonperformance by counterparties to contracts. Risk of nonperformance by counterparties includes the inability to perform because of a counterparty’s financial condition and also the risk that the counterparty will refuse to perform a contract during a period of price fluctuations where contract prices are significantly different than the current market prices.
We are subject to global and regional economic downturns and risks relating to turmoil in global financial markets.
The level of demand for our products is increasingly affected by regional and global demographic and macroeconomic conditions, including population growth rates and changes in standards of living. A significant downturn in global economic growth, or recessionary conditions in major geographic regions, may lead to reduced demand for agricultural commodities which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Additionally, weak global economic conditions and turmoil in global financial markets, including constraints on the availability of credit, have in the past adversely affected, and may in the future continue to adversely affect, the financial condition and creditworthiness of some of our customers, suppliers and other counterparties which in turn may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.
6
We could be affected by higher than anticipated operating costs, including but not limited to increased prices for soybeans.
In addition to general market fluctuations and economic conditions, we could experience significant cost increases associated with the ongoing operation of our soybean processing and refining plants caused by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These cost increases could arise from an inadequate local supply of soybeans and resulting increased price that is not accompanied by an increase in the price for soybean meal and oil. Labor costs can also increase over time, particularly if there is any shortage of labor, or shortage of persons with the skills necessary to operate our facility. Adequacy and cost of electric and natural gas utilities could also affect our operating costs. Changes in price, operation and availability of truck and rail transportation may affect our profitability with respect to the transportation of soybean meal, oil and other products to our customers.
It may become more difficult to sell our soybean oil for human consumption.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires food manufacturers to disclose the levels of trans-fatty acids contained in their products. In addition, various local governments in the U.S. are considering, and some have enacted, restrictions on the use of trans-fats in restaurants. Several food processors have either switched or indicated an intention to switch to edible oil products with lower levels of trans-fatty acids. Because processing soybean oil, particularly hydrogenation, creates trans-fat, it may become difficult to sell our oil to customers engaged in the food industry which could adversely affect our revenues and profits.
Hedging transactions involve risks that could harm our profitability.
To reduce our price change risks associated with holding fixed price commodity positions, we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts (either a straight futures contract or an options futures contract) for soybeans, soybean meal and crude soybean oil on the Chicago Board of Trade. While hedging activities reduce our risk of loss from changing market values, such activities also limit the gain potential which otherwise could result from those market fluctuations. Our policy is to maintain hedged positions within limits, but we can be long or short at any time. In addition, at any one time, our inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to our facility may be substantial, which could limit our ability to adjust our hedged positions. If our risk management policies and procedures that guide our net position limits are inadequate, we could suffer adverse financial consequences.
Our business is not diversified.
Our success depends on our ability to profitably operate our soybean processing and soybean oil refining plants. We do not have any other lines of business or other sources of revenue if we are unable to operate our soybean processing and soybean oil refining plants. This lack of diversification may limit our ability to adapt to changing business conditions and could cause harm to our business.
We are dependent on our management and other key personnel, and loss of their services may adversely affect our business.
Our success and business strategy is dependent in large part on our ability to attract and retain key management and operating personnel. This can present particular challenges for us because we operate in a specialized industry and because our business is located in a rural area. Such individuals are in high demand and are often subject to competing employment offers in the agricultural value-added industries. Any loss of the managers or key employees or the failure of such individuals to perform their job functions in a satisfactory manner would have a material adverse effect on our business operations and prospects.
We operate in an intensely competitive industry and we may not be able to continue to compete effectively.
We may not be able to continue to successfully penetrate the markets for our products. The soybean processing business is highly competitive, and other companies presently in the market, or that could enter the market, could adversely affect prices for the products we sell. We compete with other soybean processors such as Archer-Daniels Midland (ADM), Cargill, Bunge, and Ag Processing (AGP), among others, all of which are capable of producing significantly greater quantities of soybean products than we do, and may achieve higher operating efficiencies and lower costs due to their scale.
Our profitability is influenced by the protein and moisture content of the soybeans in the local growing area.
The northern portion of the western soybean belt, where our two soybean crushing plants are located, typically produces a lower protein soybean resulting in a lower protein soybean meal. Because lower protein soybean meal is sold at a lower price, we may not be able to operate as profitably as soybean processing plants in other parts of the country. If adverse weather conditions further reduce the protein content of the soybeans grown in our area, our business may be materially harmed because we will be required to sell our soybean meal at discounted prices to our customers.
In addition, the moisture content of the soybeans that are delivered to our plants also influences our profitability and the efficiency of our plant operations. Soybeans with high moisture content require more energy to dry them before
7
they can be processed. While we may recover some of these extra energy costs by paying producers less for high moisture soybeans, these savings may not be sufficient to offset our additional operating expenses.
Because soybean processing and refining is energy intensive, our business will be materially harmed if energy prices increase substantially.
Electricity prices have steadily increased the last few years, and natural gas prices have fluctuated historically. Currently, natural gas prices are at very low levels. If the trend in electricity prices continues, any significant increase in the price of natural gas will increase our energy costs and adversely affect our profitability and operating results. In addition, there are no natural gas distribution lines near the newly-acquired oilseed processing plant near Miller, South Dakota, making electricity the only current source of energy at that facility.
Transportation costs are a factor in the price of soybean meal and oil, and increased transportation costs could adversely affect our profitability.
Soybean meal and oil may be shipped by trucks, rail cars, and barges. Added transportation costs are a significant factor in the price of our products, and we may be more vulnerable to increases in transportation costs than other producers because our locations in Volga and Miller are more remote than that of most of our competitors. Today, most of our products are sold FOB Volga or Miller, South Dakota, and those that are not, have the full transportation cost added to the contract. Transportation costs do not currently affect our margin directly; however, the added costs could eventually affect demand for our products.
Increases in the production of soybean meal or oil could result in lower prices for soybean meal or oil and have other adverse effects.
Existing soybean processing and refining plants could construct additions to increase their production, and new soybean processing and refining plants could be constructed as well. If there is not a corresponding increase in the demand for soybean meal and oil, or if the increased demand is not significant, the increased production of soybean meal and oil may lead to lower prices for soybean meal and oil. The increased production of soybean meal and oil could have other adverse effects as well. AGP recently announced their plans to construct a soybean processing facility in northeast South Dakota. The increased production of soybean meal and oil could result in increased demand for soybeans which could in turn lead to higher prices for soybeans, resulting in higher costs of production and lower profits if we are not able to lock in satisfactory margins on future soybean purchases and soybean meal and oil sales.
Legislative, legal or regulatory developments could adversely affect our profitability.
We are subject to extensive air, water and other environmental laws and regulations at the federal and state level. In addition, some of these laws require our plant to operate under a number of environmental permits. These laws, regulations and permits can often require pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit actual or potential impacts to the environment. A violation of these laws and regulations or permit conditions can result in substantial fines, damages, criminal sanctions, permit revocations and/or plant shutdowns.
New environmental laws and regulations, including new regulations relating to alternative energy sources and the risk of global climate change, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, increased governmental enforcement or other developments could require us to make additional unforeseen expenditures. It is expected that some form of regulation will be forthcoming at the federal level in the U.S. with respect to emissions of GHGs, (including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxides). Also, new federal or state legislation or regulatory programs that restrict emissions of GHGs in areas where we conduct business could adversely affect our operations and demand for our products. New legislation or regulator programs could require substantial expenditures for the installation and operation of equipment that we do not currently possess or substantial modifications to existing equipment.
In addition, although our production of soybean meal and oil is not directly regulated by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration, we must comply with the FDA’s content and labeling requirements, which are monitored at our customers’ facilities. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in fines, liability to our customers or other consequences that could increase our operating costs and reduce profits. In addition, changes to the FDA’s rules or regulations could be adopted that would increase our operating costs and expenses, or require capital investment.
We are subject to industry-specific risks which could adversely affect our operating results.
We are subject to risks which include, but are not limited to, product quality or contamination; shifting consumer preferences; federal, state, and local food processing regulations; socially unacceptable farming practices; environmental, health and safety regulations; and customer product liability claims. The liability which could result from certain of these risks may not always be covered by, or could exceed liability insurance related to product liability and food safety matters maintained by us. The occurrence of any of the matters described above could adversely affect our revenues and operating results. Our products are used as ingredients in livestock and poultry feed. Thus, we are subject to risks associated with the outbreak of disease in livestock and poultry, including, but not limited to, mad-cow disease and avian influenza. The
8
outbreak of disease could adversely affect demand for our products used as ingredients in livestock and poultry feed. A decrease in demand for these products could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.
We could face increased operating costs if we were required to segregate genetically modified soybeans and the products generated from these soybeans.
In the last several years, some soybean producers in our area have been planting genetically modified soybeans, commonly known as Round-up Ready beans. Neither the U.S. Department of Agriculture nor the FDA currently requires that genetically modified soybeans be segregated from other soybeans. If these agencies or our customers were to require that we process these genetically modified soybeans separately, we would face increased storage and processing costs and our profitability could be harmed.
There is no public market for our units and no public market is expected to develop.
There is no established public trading market for our units, and we do not expect one to develop in the foreseeable future. We have established through AgStockTrade.com, a registered alternative trading system, a private online matching service, in order to facilitate trading of units among our members. The matching service has been designed to comply with federal tax laws and IRS regulations establishing a “qualified matching service,” as well as state and federal securities laws. There are detailed timelines that must be followed under our capital units transfer system with respect to offers and sales of units. All transactions must comply with the capital units transfer system, our operating agreement, and are subject to approval by our board of managers. As a result, units held by our members may not be easily resold and members may be required to hold their units indefinitely. Even if members are able to resell our units, the price may be less than the members' investment in the units or may otherwise be unattractive to the member.
There are significant restrictions on the transfer of our units.
To protect our status as a partnership for tax purposes and to assure that no public trading market in our units develops, our units are subject to significant restrictions on transfer and transfers are subject to approval by our board of managers. All transfers of units must comply with the transfer provisions of our operating agreement and the capital units transfer system adopted by our board of managers. Our board of managers will not approve transfers which could cause us to lose our tax status or violate federal or state securities laws. As a result of the provisions of our operating agreement, members may not be able to transfer their units and may be required to assume the risks of the investment for an indefinite period of time.
We conduct our operations principally at our two facilities in Volga, South Dakota and Miller, South Dakota.
At our Volga facility, we own the land, consisting of 106 acres, on which most of the infrastructure and physical properties rest. Our facilities consist of a soybean processing plant, a soybean oil refinery and deodorizer, a quality control laboratory, and administrative and operations buildings.
At our Miller facility, we own the land, consisting of approximately 24 acres, on which the soybean processing plant and operations building rest. This facility began processing in April 2015.
All of our tangible property, real and personal, serves as collateral for our debt instruments with our primary lender, CoBank, ACB, of Greenwood Village, Colorado, which is described below under “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Indebtedness.”
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including without limitation, workers’ compensation claims, tort claims, or contractual disputes. We carry insurance that provides protection against general commercial liability claims, claims against our directors, officers and employees, business interruption, automobile liability, and workers’ compensation claims. Except for the event listed below, we are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings and are not aware of any potential claims.
On November 5, 2015, an incident occurred at our facility in Volga, South Dakota which resulted in the death of an outside contractor. The contractor was in the process of installing a catwalk in the vicinity of an oil storage tank when the incident occurred. No other injuries were reported, and property damage from the accident was limited to the tank and surrounding piping. We have reported the accident to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA"), which is conducting an investigation. No civil lawsuit has been filed. We notified our respective insurance carriers.
9
None.
As of March 1, 2016, the total number of Class A capital units outstanding is 30,419,000, all of which is owned and held by 2,185 members.
Trading Activity
Our capital units are not traded on an exchange or otherwise publicly traded and are subject to significant restrictions on transfer under the registrant's operating agreement. Trading of our capital units is conducted through a “qualified matching service” as defined by the publicly-traded partnership rules of the federal tax code. Under the qualified matching service, bids for capital units submitted by interested buyers and sellers are matched on the basis of rules and conditions set forth under the federal tax code and by us, all trades being subject to approval by our board of managers. Our qualified matching service is operated through www.AgStockTrade.com, an SEC-registered Alternative Trading Service owned and operated by Variable Investment Advisors, Inc., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, a registered broker-dealer with the SEC, FINRA, and various states. The following table contains historical information by quarter for the past two years regarding the trading of capital units through the qualified matching service:
|
Quarter
|
Low Price
(1)
|
High Price
(1)
|
Average
Price
|
# of
Capital
Units Traded
|
|||||||||||
|
First Quarter 2014
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
120,750
|
|
||||
|
Second Quarter 2014
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
70,000
|
|
||||
|
Third Quarter 2014
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
20,000
|
|
||||
|
Fourth Quarter 2014
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
43,750
|
|
||||
|
First Quarter 2015
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
50,500
|
|
||||
|
Second Quarter 2015
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
$
|
2.86
|
|
77,000
|
|
||||
|
Third Quarter 2015
|
$
|
2.95
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
52,500
|
|
||||
|
Fourth Quarter 2015
|
$
|
3.95
|
|
$
|
4.10
|
|
$
|
4.09
|
|
27,500
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
The qualified matching service prohibits firm bids; therefore, the prices reflect actual sale prices of the capital units.
|
Trading and Transfer Restrictions
As a limited liability company, we must severely restrict trading and transfers of our capital units in order to preserve our preferential single-level partnership tax status at the member level. To preserve this, our operating agreement prohibits transfers other than through the procedures specified under our capital units transfer system, or CUTS, which may be amended from time to time by our board of managers. Under the CUTS, our capital units cannot be traded on any national securities exchange or in any over-the-counter market. Also, we cannot permit the number of capital units traded through the qualified matching service on an annual basis to exceed 10% of our total issued and outstanding capital units. All transactions, including any trades on the qualified matching service, must be approved by the board of managers, which are generally approved if they fall within “safe harbors” contained in the rules of the federal tax code. Permitted transfers include transfers by gift or death, sales to qualified family members, and trades through the qualified matching service subject to the 10% restriction. Pursuant to our operating agreement, a minimum of 2,500 capital units is required to be owned by an individual for membership, and no member may own more than 1.5% of our total outstanding capital units.
10
Distributions
We paid cash distributions to our members of $11.0 million (36.2¢ per capital unit) and $15.0 million (49.5¢ per capital unit) in 2014 and 2015, respectively. On January 19, 2016, our board of managers approved a cash distribution of approximately $15.0 million (49.5¢ per capital unit). The distribution was issued to our members on or about February 8, 2016 in accordance with our operating agreement and distribution policy. Our distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of managers and are issued in accordance with the terms of our operating agreement. In addition, distributions are subject to restrictions imposed under our loan agreement with our lender. There is no assurance as to if, when, or how much we will make in distributions in the future. Actual distributions depend upon our profitability, expenses and other factors discussed in this report.
The following table sets forth selected financial data of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC for the periods indicated. The financial statements included in Item 8 of this report were audited by Eide Bailly LLP.
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||||||||||
|
Bushels processed
|
29,923,155
|
|
28,190,596
|
|
27,159,521
|
|
26,228,731
|
|
24,370,299
|
|
|||||||||
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
367,560,428
|
|
$
|
434,842,176
|
|
$
|
468,833,992
|
|
$
|
411,985,913
|
|
$
|
397,228,087
|
|
||||
|
Costs & expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
(342,658,664
|
)
|
(412,855,361
|
)
|
(446,180,873
|
)
|
(395,072,744
|
)
|
(396,703,189
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Operating expenses
|
(3,571,570
|
)
|
(4,338,147
|
)
|
(2,884,760
|
)
|
(2,415,460
|
)
|
(2,307,650
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
21,330,194
|
|
17,648,668
|
|
19,768,359
|
|
14,497,709
|
|
(1,782,752
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Non-operating income
|
2,168,860
|
|
3,494,460
|
|
3,079,755
|
|
2,171,884
|
|
2,735,725
|
|
|||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(546,648
|
)
|
(1,076,620
|
)
|
(1,665,339
|
)
|
(1,928,660
|
)
|
(1,308,195
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(570
|
)
|
(1,870
|
)
|
(1,000
|
)
|
(1,000
|
)
|
(300
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
22,951,836
|
|
20,064,638
|
|
21,181,775
|
|
14,739,933
|
|
(355,522
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Gain (loss) on discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,272
|
|
(236,800
|
)
|
(3,592,800
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
22,951,836
|
|
$
|
20,064,638
|
|
$
|
21,191,047
|
|
$
|
14,503,133
|
|
$
|
(3,948,322
|
)
|
||||
|
Weighted average capital units outstanding
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss) per capital unit
|
$
|
0.755
|
|
$
|
0.660
|
|
$
|
0.697
|
|
$
|
0.477
|
|
$
|
(0.130
|
)
|
||||
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Working capital
|
$
|
28,143,049
|
|
$
|
21,909,558
|
|
$
|
14,578,205
|
|
$
|
13,253,429
|
|
$
|
6,742,521
|
|
||||
|
Net property, plant & equipment
|
40,921,077
|
|
38,750,892
|
|
29,838,791
|
|
26,468,051
|
|
26,398,309
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total assets
|
122,914,781
|
|
117,137,344
|
|
135,156,519
|
|
141,045,236
|
|
90,107,428
|
|
|||||||||
|
Long-term obligations
|
787,096
|
|
896,260
|
|
4,091,791
|
|
11,726,213
|
|
14,247,972
|
|
|||||||||
|
Members’ equity
|
74,508,352
|
|
66,604,997
|
|
46,541,671
|
|
36,348,365
|
|
26,921,337
|
|
|||||||||
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$
|
5,225,636
|
|
$
|
10,981,737
|
|
$
|
5,435,284
|
|
$
|
1,854,226
|
|
3,139,905
|
|
|||||
|
Impairment charges
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
637,318
|
|
||||
|
Distributions to members
|
$
|
15,048,481
|
|
$
|
11,001,312
|
|
$
|
5,076,105
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Distributions to members per capital unit
|
$
|
0.495
|
|
$
|
0.362
|
|
$
|
0.167
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
11
You should read the following discussion along with our financial statements and the notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results, performance and achievements may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” at the beginning of this report.
Overview and Executive Summary
We recorded a net income of $23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which marks our largest profit ever and the fourth consecutive year of solid earnings. Several factors contributed to the successful year. First, despite a record soybean crush rate and large South American crop, the domestic demand for soybean meal remained strong. Second, our facilities operated very well in 2015, producing a record 29.9 million bushels of soybeans and 326 million pounds of refined soybean oil. In addition to low natural gas and interest costs, our marketing and administration departments successfully capitalized on certain market and risk-management opportunities, positioning the plant for improved margins overall. Finally, our soybean supply was very favorable in 2015. Soybean producers in our region, which experienced high soybean yields, produced and delivered to us high quality soybeans - low in moisture and high in oil and protein content.
Our expectations for a repeat financial performance of 2015 in 2016 are low. While demand for our soybean meal and other products was strong in 2015, prices for these products are gravitating lower, reflecting the overall change in the commodity markets as a whole.
Accompanying the decrease in soybean meal prices, has been the decrease in price of our co-products - soybean hulls, lecithin, soapstock, and oil distillates, to name a few. These price decreases are likely to have a negative impact on future profitability. Our profit margin may also be hurt by an excess supply of soybeans from South America.
We plan, nevertheless, to continue to analyze and evaluate our operations in order to mitigate against factors affecting profitability. We plan to move forward with projects in 2016 that are expected to assist us to remain competitive and more capable of coping with an expected downturn. These projects will be focused on improving efficiencies and keeping our products competitive (superior product quality).
Results of Operations
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2015
|
Year Ended December 31, 2014
|
|||||||||||
|
|
$
|
% of
Revenue
|
$
|
% of
Revenue
|
|||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
367,560,428
|
|
100.0
|
|
$
|
434,842,176
|
|
100.0
|
|
|||
|
Cost of revenues
|
(342,658,664
|
)
|
(93.2
|
)
|
(412,855,361
|
)
|
(94.9
|
)
|
|||||
|
Operating expenses
|
(3,571,570
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
(4,338,147
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other income (expense)
|
1,622,212
|
|
0.4
|
|
2,417,840
|
|
0.6
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(570
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,870
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
22,951,836
|
|
6.2
|
|
$
|
20,064,638
|
|
4.6
|
|
|||
Revenue
– Revenue decreased $67.3 million, or 15.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to a decrease in the sales price of all our soybean products (meal, oil, hulls, and other co-products). The decrease in sales prices is primarily due to an increase in the supply of soybeans resulting from an improved harvest in late 2014. Partially offsetting the decrease in sales price is a 6.1% increase in the volume of soybeans processed during 2015, compared to 2014, which increased the sales volume of our soybean products.
Gross Profit/Loss
– Gross profit increased $2.9 million, or 13.3%, during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The increase is due to a very strong export demand, a tight supply of soybean meal in
12
early 2015, and a decrease in the cost of soybeans. The tight meal supply in early 2015 resulted from the 2014 soybean harvest, which was delayed due to rain throughout most of the U.S. This delay caused many U.S. soybean processors to fall behind on meal shipments. Fortunately, the rain avoided our operations during the 2014 harvest, which allowed us to capitalize on meeting other customers' needs. The decrease in soybean prices was due to an increased supply of soybeans in 2015, compared to 2014 when there was a very tight supply of soybeans throughout most of the U.S.
Operating Expenses
– Administrative expenses, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, decreased $767,000, or 17.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to 2014. The decrease is due to accruing a $0.5 million allowance for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable in 2015, compared to $1.5 million in 2014.
Interest Expense
– Interest expense decreased by $530,000, or 49.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The decrease in interest expense is due primarily to decreased debt levels, which resulted from reductions of inventory quantities and commodity prices. The average debt level during the year ended December 31, 2015 was approximately $3.4 million, compared to $16.5 million for the same period in 2014.
Other Non-Operating Income
– Other non-operating income, including patronage dividend income, decreased $1.3 million, or 37.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The decrease is due primarily to decreases in patronage allocations from our associated cooperatives, including CoBank and Minnesota Soybean Processors, and the quantity of crude soybean oil stored for the CBOT. In 2015, patronage distributions totaled $816,000, compared to $1.6 million in 2014.
Net Income/Loss
– During the year ended December 31, 2015, we generated a net income of $23.0 million, compared to $20.1 million during the same period in 2014. The $2.9 million increase in net income is primarily attributable to an increase in gross profit associated with improved margins, increased production, and decreases in operating and interest expenses.
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2014
|
Year Ended December 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||
|
|
$
|
% of
Revenue
|
$
|
% of
Revenue
|
|||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
434,842,176
|
|
100.0
|
|
$
|
468,833,992
|
|
100.0
|
|
|||
|
Cost of revenues
|
(412,855,361
|
)
|
(94.9
|
)
|
(446,180,873
|
)
|
(95.2
|
)
|
|||||
|
Operating expenses
|
(4,338,147
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
(2,884,760
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other income (expense)
|
2,417,840
|
|
0.6
|
|
1,414,416
|
|
0.3
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(1,870
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
20,064,638
|
|
4.6
|
|
21,181,775
|
|
4.5
|
|
|||||
|
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,272
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
20,064,638
|
|
4.6
|
|
$
|
21,191,047
|
|
4.5
|
|
|||
Revenue
– Revenue decreased $34.0 million, or 7.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to a 17% decrease in the sales price of soybean oil, which is the result of a reduction of soybean oil exports and increased production of competing oilseeds such as canola and sunflowers.
Gross Profit/Loss
– Gross profit decreased $666,000, or 2.9%, during the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. The decrease is attributed to a $2.1 million increase in production costs which is due mainly to an increase in natural gas costs. Cold temperatures throughout the U.S. during the winter and spring months caused natural gas prices to rise significantly in 2014. Additionally, the locally-grown soybeans we received and processed in 2014 contained more moisture than the same period in 2013, thus requiring more energy to dry before processing.
Operating Expenses
– Administrative expenses, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, increased $1.5 million, or 50.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 2013. The increase is due to the booking of a $1.5 million allowance for an uncollectible account receivable in 2014, compared to $0 in the same period in 2013.
13
Interest Expense
– Interest expense decreased by $589,000, or 35.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 2013. The decrease in interest expense is due primarily to decreased debt levels, which resulted from reductions of inventory quantities and commodity prices. The average debt level during the year ended December 31, 2014 was approximately $16.5 million, compared to $31.0 million for the same period in 2013.
Other Non-Operating Income
– Other non-operating income, including patronage dividend income, increased $415,000, or 13.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 2013. The increase is primarily due to an increase in patronage distributions from our associated cooperatives, including CoBank and Minnesota Soybean Processors. In 2014, patronage distributions totaled $1.6 million, compared to $1.2 million in 2013.
Net Income/Loss
– During the year ended December 31, 2014, we generated a net income of $20.1 million, compared to $21.2 million during the same period in 2013. The $1.1 million decrease in net income is primarily due to increased production and operating expenses. The increased production and operating expenses is partially offset by decreased interest expense and increased non-operating income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and borrowings under our two lines of credit which are discussed below under “Indebtedness.” On
December 31, 2015
, we had working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, of approximately
$28.1 million
, compared to working capital of
$21.9 million
on
December 31, 2014
. Working capital increased between periods primarily due to an increase in net income. Based on our current operating plans, we believe that we will be able to fund our needs for the foreseeable future from cash from operations and revolving lines of credit.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
$
|
24,410,610
|
|
$
|
43,404,122
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(4,584,583
|
)
|
(10,655,211
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
(12,177,511
|
)
|
(22,005,015
|
)
|
|||
Cash Flows From (Used For) Operating Activities
The $19.0 million decrease in cash flows from operating activities is primarily attributed to a $23.7 million change in the decrease in inventory and a $6.6 million change in the decrease in accounts receivable during 2015, compared to 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, inventory decreased by approximately $7.4 million, compared to $31.1 million during the same period in 2014. In addition, accounts receivable decreased by $1.2 million in 2015, compared to a $7.8 million in 2014. The decreased cash flows from inventory and accounts receivable was partially offset by a $10.2 million change in the accrued commodity purchases during 2015, compared to 2014. The changes in inventories, accounts receivable and accrued commodity purchases are the result of the decrease in commodity prices following the large U.S. soybean harvests in 2014 and 2015.
Cash Flows From (Used For) Investing Activity
Cash flows used for investing activities decreased $6.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The decrease is the result of $5.8 million decrease in spending on capital improvements in 2015, compared to 2014. On December 19, 2014, we purchased an oilseed processing plant near Miller, South Dakota, which is approximately 100 miles west of our Volga facility.
Cash Flows From (Used For) Financing Activity
The $9.8 million decrease in cash flows used for financing activities is principally due to a $13.9 million decrease in payments on borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The decrease in cash flows used for financing activities was partially offset by an increase in distributions to members. We distributed a record $15.0 million in cash to members in 2015, compared to $11.0 million in 2014.
14
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
|
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
$
|
43,404,122
|
|
$
|
22,136,230
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(10,655,211
|
)
|
(2,695,485
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
(22,005,015
|
)
|
(19,733,569
|
)
|
|||
Cash Flows From (Used For) Operating Activities
The $21.3 million increase in cash flows from operating activities is primarily attributed to decreases in inventory and accounts receivable in 2014, compared to 2013. Our inventory decreased by $31.1 million in 2014, compared to $7.7 million during the same period in 2013. Accounts receivable decreased by $7.8 million in 2014, compared to a $0.3 million increase in 2013. Partially offsetting the decreases in inventories and accounts receivable is a $14.9 million decrease in accrued commodity purchases during 2014, compared to $7.7 million in 2013. The changes in inventories, accounts receivable and accrued commodity purchases resulted from a decrease in commodity prices.
Cash Flows From (Used For) Investing Activity
Cash flows used for investing activities increased $8.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. The increase is the result of $5.5 million of additional spending on capital improvements and a $2.6 million decrease in distributions received in 2014, compared to 2013. We spent $11.0 million on capital improvements in 2014, compared to $5.4 million during the same period in 2013. On December 19, 2014, we purchased an oilseed processing plant. In 2014, we received a $125,000 distribution from CHS for the retirement of previous patronage allocations, compared to a $2.7 million distribution in 2013.
Cash Flows From (Used For) Financing Activity
The $2.3 million increase in cash flows used for financing activities is principally due to an increase in distributions to members. We distributed $11.0 million in cash to members during the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $5.1 million during the same period in 2013.
Indebtedness
We have two lines of credit with CoBank, our primary lender, to meet the short and long-term needs of our operations. The first credit line is a revolving long-term loan. Under the terms of this loan, we may borrow funds as needed up to the credit line maximum, or $10.0 million, and then pay down the principal whenever excess cash is available. Repaid amounts may be borrowed up to the available credit line. Beginning on March 20, 2017, the available credit line is reduced by $1.25 million every six months until the credit line’s maturity on September 20, 2020. We pay a 0.40% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed. There were no advances outstanding on the revolving term loan as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. Under this loan, $10.0 million was available to borrow as of December 31, 2015.
The second credit line is a revolving working capital (seasonal) loan that matures on September 30, 2016. The primary purpose of this loan is to finance inventory and receivables. The maximum available to borrow under this credit line is $15 million until May 1, 2016, at which time it decreases to $1 million until the loan's maturity date. Borrowing base reports and financial statements are required monthly to justify the balance borrowed on this line. We pay a 0.20% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed; however, we have the option to reduce the credit line during any given commitment period listed in the agreement to avoid the commitment fee. There were no advances outstanding on the working capital loan as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. Under this loan, $15.0 million was available to borrow as of December 31, 2015.
Both loans with CoBank are set up with a variable rate option. The variable rate is set by CoBank and changes weekly on the first business day of each week. We also have a fixed rate option on both loans allowing us to fix rates for any period between one day and the entire commitment period. The annual interest rate on the revolving term loan is 2.88% and 3.16% as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the interest rate on the seasonal loan is 2.63% and 2.91%, respectively. We were in compliance with all covenants and conditions under the loans as of December 31, 2015 and the date of this filing.
15
On March 1, 2013, the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation agreed to loan the Brookings County Regional Railway Authority a sum of $964,070 for purposes of making improvements to the railway infrastructure near our soybean processing plant in Volga, South Dakota. In consideration of this secured loan, we agreed to provide a guarantee to the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation for the full amount of the loan, plus 2% interest. This guarantee was converted into a direct debt obligation of ours on October 16, 2013, when we received the $964,070 in loan proceeds and assumed responsibility for the loan's annual principal and interest payments of $75,500 which began on June 1, 2014. The note payable matures on June 1, 2020.
Capital Expenditures
We invested approximately $5.2 million in capital expenditures for property and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to approximately $11.0 million in capital expenditures during the year ended December 31, 2014. In 2015, we made several improvements to our small oilseed processing plant near Miller, South Dakota, as well as made several other miscellaneous improvements to enhance the quality and efficiency of our soybean crushing facility and oil refinery in Volga, South Dakota. Depending on our profitability in 2016, we anticipate spending between $5.0 million and $8.0 million on capital improvements in 2016. Our principal sources of funds are anticipated to be cash flows from operating activities.
Off Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
Except as described below, we do not utilize variable interest entities or other off-balance sheet financial arrangements.
Lease Commitments
We have commitments under various operating leases for rail cars, various types of vehicles, and lab and office equipment. Our most significant lease commitments are the rail car leases we use to distribute our products. We have several long-term leases for hopper rail cars and oil tank cars with American Railcar Leasing, FRS 1, GATX Corporation, GE Capital, and Trinity Capital. Total lease expense under these arrangements is approximately $3.0 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
In addition to rail car leases, we have several operating leases for various equipment and storage facilities. Total lease expense under these arrangements is $129,000 and $127,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Some of our leases include purchase options, none of which, however, are for a value less than fair market value at the end of the lease.
Other Long-Term Commitments
We had a commitment under a Grain Storage and Transportation Agreement with H&I Grain of Hetland, Inc. (H&I). This agreement, which expired on August 31, 2014, was for the handling, storage and transportation of soybeans to and from H&I’s facilities located in DeSmet, Hetland, and Arlington, South Dakota, at established rates per bushel. The agreement provided for an annual minimum payment of $200,000. Expenses under this agreement were $0 and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Contractual Obligations
The following table shows our contractual obligations for the periods presented:
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5
years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations (1)
|
$
|
930,000
|
|
$
|
76,000
|
|
$
|
152,000
|
|
$
|
702,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
11,144,000
|
|
2,757,000
|
|
4,399,000
|
|
3,321,000
|
|
667,000
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
12,074,000
|
|
$
|
2,833,000
|
|
$
|
4,551,000
|
|
$
|
4,023,000
|
|
$
|
667,000
|
|
|||||
16
|
(1)
|
Represents principal and interest payments on our notes payable, which are included on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See page F-11, Note 1 of our audited financial statements for a discussion on the impact, if any, of the recently pronounced accounting standards.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Preparation of our financial statements requires estimates and judgments to be made that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. We continually evaluate these estimates based on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The difficulty in applying these policies arises from the assumptions, estimates, and judgments that have to be made currently about matters that are inherently uncertain, such as future economic conditions, operating results and valuations as well as management intentions. As the difficulty increases, the level of precision decreases, meaning that actual results can and probably will be different from those currently estimated.
Of the significant accounting policies described in the notes to the financial statements, we believe that the following may involve a higher degree of estimates, judgments, and complexity:
Commitments and Contingencies
Contingencies, by their nature relate to uncertainties that require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred, as well as in estimating the amount of the potential expense. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., we accrue an expense when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Inventory Valuation
We account for our inventories at estimated market value. These inventories are agricultural commodities that are freely traded, have quoted market prices, may be sold without significant further processing, and have predictable and insignificant costs of disposal. We derive our estimates from local market prices determined by grain terminals in our area. Processed product price estimates are determined by the ending sales contract price as of the close of the final day of the period. This price is determined by the average closing price on the Chicago Board of Trade, net of the local basis, for the last two business days of the period and the first business day of the subsequent period. Changes in the market values of these inventories are recognized as a component of cost of goods sold.
Long-Lived Assets
Depreciation and amortization of our property, plant and equipment is provided on the straight-lined method by charges to operations at rates based upon the expected useful lives of individual or groups of assets. Economic circumstances or other factors may cause management’s estimates of expected useful lives to differ from actual.
Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and investments are evaluated for impairment on the basis of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impaired asset is written down to its estimated fair market value based on the best information available. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate undiscounted future cash flows and may differ from actual.
We evaluate the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, (2) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or (3) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. We measure the carrying amount of the asset against the estimated undiscounted future
17
cash flows associated with it. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value of the asset being evaluated, an impairment loss is recognized.
The impairment loss is calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeded its fair value. The fair value is measured based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The evaluation of asset impairment requires us to make assumptions about future cash flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We minimize the effects of changes in the price of agricultural commodities by using exchange-traded futures and options contracts to minimize our net positions in these inventories and contracts. We account for changes in market value on exchange-traded futures and option contracts at exchange prices and account for the changes in value of forward purchase and sales contracts at local market prices determined by grain terminals in the area. Changes in the market value of all these contracts are recognized in earnings as a component of cost of goods sold.
Commodities Risk & Risk Management.
To reduce the price change risks associated with holding fixed price commodity positions, we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts (either a straight or options futures contract) on a regulated commodity futures exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade. While hedging activities reduce the risk of loss from changing market prices, such activities also limit the gain potential which otherwise could result from these significant fluctuations in market prices. Our policy is generally to maintain a hedged position within limits, but we can be long or short at any time. Our profitability is primarily derived from margins on soybeans processed, not from hedging transactions. Management does not anticipate that its hedging activity will have a significant impact on future operating results or liquidity. Hedging arrangements do not protect against nonperformance of a cash contract.
At any one time, our inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to our facility may be substantial. We have risk management policies and procedures that include net position limits. They are defined by commodity, and include both trader and management limits. This policy and procedure triggers a review by management when any trader is outside of position limits. The position limits are reviewed at least annually with the board of managers. We monitor current market conditions and may expand or reduce the limits in response to changes in those conditions.
An adverse change in market prices would not materially affect our profitability since we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures and forward contracts as economic hedges of price risk.
Foreign Currency Risk.
We conduct essentially all of our business in U.S. dollars and have minimal direct risk regarding foreign currency fluctuations. Foreign currency fluctuations do, however, impact the ability of foreign buyers to purchase U.S. agricultural products and the competitiveness of and demand for U.S. agricultural products compared to the same products offered by foreign suppliers.
An adverse change in market prices would not materially affect our profitability since we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures and forward contracts as economic hedges of price risk.
Interest Rate Risk.
We manage exposure to interest rate changes by using variable rate loan agreements with fixed rate options. Long-term loan agreements can utilize the fixed option through maturity; however, the revolving ability to pay down and borrow back would be eliminated once the funds were fixed.
As of
December 31, 2015
, we had
$845,440
in fixed rate debt and $25 million of variable rate debt available to borrow. Interest rate changes impact the amount of our interest payments and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows. Assuming other variables remain constant, a one percentage point (1%) increase in interest rates on our variable rate debt could have an estimated impact on profitability of approximately $250,000 per year.
18
Reference is made to the “Index to Financial Statements” of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC located on the page immediately preceding page F-1 of this report, and financial statements and schedules for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
None.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Additionally, based on management’s evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As of
December 31, 2015
, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in
Internal Control- Integrated Framework
, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on this assessment using those criteria, management concluded that, as of
December 31, 2015
, our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Our management reviewed the results of their assessment with the Audit Committee.
This Annual Report does not include a report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting was not subject to an audit report by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this report.
19
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
December 31, 2015
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
/s/ Thomas Kersting
|
|
|
Thomas Kersting, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
/s/ Mark Hyde
|
|
|
Mark Hyde, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
None.
Pursuant to General Instructions G(3), we omit Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14, and incorporate such items by reference to an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or to a Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Report (
December 31, 2015
).
The following exhibits and financial statements are filed as part of, or are incorporated by reference into, this report:
(a)(1)
Financial Statements
— Reference is made to the “Index to Financial Statements” of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC located on the page immediately preceding page F-1 of this report for a list of the financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2015
. The financial statements appear on page F-2 of this Report.
(2) All supplemental schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits
- See Exhibit Index following the Signature Page to this report. The following exhibits constitute management agreements, compensatory plans, or arrangements: Exhibits 10.10.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized:
|
|
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
|
||
|
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Thomas Kersting
|
|
|
Thomas Kersting, Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
/s/ Mark Hyde
|
|
|
|
Mark Hyde, Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
||
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Thomas Kersting
|
|
|
Thomas Kersting, Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Mark Hyde
|
|
|
Mark Hyde
|
||
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Paul Barthel
|
|
|
Paul Barthel, Manager
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Gary Duffy
|
|
|
Gary Duffy, Manager
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Paul Dummer
|
|
|
Paul Dummer, Manager
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Wayne Enger
|
|
|
Wayne Enger, Manager
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Gary Goplen
|
|
|
Gary Goplen, Manager
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Kent Howell
|
|
|
Kent Howell, Manager
|
||
|
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Jonathan Kleinjan
|
|
Jonathan Kleinjan
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Gary Kruggel
|
|
|
Gary Kruggel, Manager
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Maurice Odenbrett
|
|
|
Maurice Odenbrett, Manager
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Doyle Renaas
|
|
|
Doyle Renaas, Manager
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Randy Tauer
|
|
|
Randy Tauer, Manager
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
By
|
/s/ Delbert Tschakert
|
|
|
Delbert Tschakert, Manager
|
||
21
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
/s/ Lyle Trautman
|
|
|
Lyle Trautman, Manager
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
/s/ Ardon Wek
|
|
|
|
Ardon Wek, Manager
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dated:
|
March 23, 2016
|
/s/ Gary Wertish
|
|
|
|
Gary Wertish, Manager
|
||
22
EXHIBIT INDEX**
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
|
Incorporated Herein by Reference to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1(i)
|
|
Articles of Organization.
|
|
|
|
Appendix A to the Registrant’s Prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) on May 24, 2002 (File No. 333-75804).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1(ii)
|
|
Operating Agreement, as amended and restated.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1(ii) to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on June 19, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1(iii)
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Organization.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1(iii) to the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on August 14, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Class A Unit Certificate.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 filed with the Commission on December 21, 2001. (File No. 333-75804)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Railroad Car Lease Agreement with Trinity Industries dated February 12, 2002.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 filed with the Commission on March 14, 2002. (File No. 333-75804)
|
|
10.2
|
|
Railcar Leasing Agreements with General Electric Railcar Services Corporation, dated November 10, 2003 and November 25, 2003.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Security Agreement with CoBank dated June 17, 2004.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 16, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Master Loan Agreement with CoBank dated March 14, 2012.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
Amendment to Master Loan Agreement with CoBank dated July 23, 2013
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 9, 2013.
|
||||
|
10.6
|
Amendment to Master Loan Agreement with CoBank dated August 5, 2014
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 10Q filed with the Commission on August 12, 2014.
|
||||
|
10.7
|
Amendment to Master Loan Agreement with CoBank dated July 15, 2015
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 10Q filed with the Commission on August 13, 2015
|
||||
|
10.8
|
|
Monitored Revolving Credit Supplement dated July 16, 2015
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 13, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
|
Incorporated Herein by Reference to
|
|
10.9
|
|
Monitored Revolving Term Loan Supplement dated July 15, 2015.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 13, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Thomas Kersting Employment Agreement dated August 18, 2015.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 21, 2015.
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14 Certified by Chief Financial officer
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Documents can be found at www.sec.gov
24
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31,
2015
,
2014
, and
2013
F-1
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
Index to Financial Statements
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members’ Equity
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-2
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
The Board of Managers and Members
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Volga, South Dakota
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (the “Company”) as of
December 31,
2015
and
2014
, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended
December 31,
2015
,
2014
, and
2013
. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC as of
December 31,
2015
and
2014
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended
December 31,
2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Greenwood Village, Colorado
March 23, 2016
F-3
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2015
and
2014
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
18,392,462
|
|
$
|
10,743,946
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts (2015 - $495,000; 2014 - $0)
|
21,907,703
|
|
23,107,816
|
|
|||
|
Inventories
|
26,318,232
|
|
33,688,242
|
|
|||
|
Margin deposits
|
7,467,409
|
|
2,549,865
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
1,676,576
|
|
1,455,776
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
75,762,382
|
|
71,545,645
|
|
|||
|
Property and equipment
|
83,083,687
|
|
78,583,353
|
|
|||
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(42,162,610
|
)
|
(39,832,461
|
)
|
|||
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
40,921,077
|
|
38,750,892
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Investments in cooperatives
|
6,225,008
|
|
6,836,461
|
|
|||
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
6,314
|
|
4,346
|
|
|||
|
Total other assets
|
6,231,322
|
|
6,840,807
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
122,914,781
|
|
$
|
117,137,344
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Members' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Current liabilities
|
|||||||
|
Excess of outstanding checks over bank balance
|
$
|
7,485,907
|
|
$
|
4,552,153
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
58,344
|
|
57,246
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
1,471,367
|
|
1,318,838
|
|
|||
|
Accrued commodity purchases
|
35,059,642
|
|
39,747,857
|
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses
|
2,775,993
|
|
2,638,130
|
|
|||
|
Accrued interest
|
229,805
|
|
359,896
|
|
|||
|
Deferred liabilities - current
|
538,275
|
|
961,967
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
47,619,333
|
|
49,636,087
|
|
|||
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
787,096
|
|
844,478
|
|
|||
|
Deferred liabilities
|
—
|
|
51,782
|
|
|||
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
787,096
|
|
896,260
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Members' equity Class A Units, no par value, 30,419,000 units issued and outstanding
|
74,508,352
|
|
66,604,997
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and members' equity
|
$
|
122,914,781
|
|
$
|
117,137,344
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
367,560,428
|
|
$
|
434,842,176
|
|
$
|
468,833,992
|
|
||
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cost of product sold
|
287,339,317
|
|
362,027,780
|
|
399,246,411
|
|
|||||
|
Production
|
22,817,827
|
|
20,754,231
|
|
18,653,510
|
|
|||||
|
Freight and rail
|
31,827,183
|
|
29,387,801
|
|
27,647,077
|
|
|||||
|
Brokerage fees
|
674,337
|
|
685,549
|
|
633,875
|
|
|||||
|
Total cost of revenues
|
342,658,664
|
|
412,855,361
|
|
446,180,873
|
|
|||||
|
Gross profit
|
24,901,764
|
|
21,986,815
|
|
22,653,119
|
|
|||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Administration
|
3,571,570
|
|
4,338,147
|
|
2,884,760
|
|
|||||
|
Operating income
|
21,330,194
|
|
17,648,668
|
|
19,768,359
|
|
|||||
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
(546,648
|
)
|
(1,076,620
|
)
|
(1,665,339
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other non-operating income
|
1,353,050
|
|
1,930,428
|
|
1,910,684
|
|
|||||
|
Patronage dividend income
|
815,810
|
|
1,564,032
|
|
1,169,071
|
|
|||||
|
Total other income (expense)
|
1,622,212
|
|
2,417,840
|
|
1,414,416
|
|
|||||
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
22,952,406
|
|
20,066,508
|
|
21,182,775
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(570
|
)
|
(1,870
|
)
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
22,951,836
|
|
20,064,638
|
|
21,181,775
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,272
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
22,951,836
|
|
$
|
20,064,638
|
|
$
|
21,191,047
|
|
||
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per capital unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
||
|
Income from discontinuing operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
||
|
Weighted average number of capital units outstanding for calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per capital unit
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members’ Equity
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
Class A Units
|
|||||
|
|
Units
|
Amount
|
||||
|
Balances, January 1, 2013
|
30,419,000
|
|
$
|
36,348,365
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
21,191,047
|
|
||
|
Distribution to members
|
—
|
|
(11,000,000
|
)
|
||
|
Decrease in subscriptions receivable
|
—
|
|
2,259
|
|
||
|
Balances, December 31, 2013
|
30,419,000
|
|
46,541,671
|
|
||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
20,064,638
|
|
||
|
Distribution to members
|
—
|
|
(1,312
|
)
|
||
|
Balances, December 31, 2014
|
30,419,000
|
|
66,604,997
|
|
||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
22,951,836
|
|
||
|
Distributions to members
|
—
|
|
(15,048,481
|
)
|
||
|
Balances, December 31, 2015
|
30,419,000
|
|
$
|
74,508,352
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
22,951,836
|
|
$
|
20,064,638
|
|
$
|
21,191,047
|
|
||
|
Gain from discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(9,272
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income from continued operations
|
22,951,836
|
|
20,064,638
|
|
21,181,775
|
|
|||||
|
Charges and credits to net income from continuing operations not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,902,546
|
|
2,188,890
|
|
2,059,867
|
|
|||||
|
(Gain) loss on sales of property and equipment
|
127,837
|
|
(19,401
|
)
|
(7,391
|
)
|
|||||
|
Non-cash patronage dividends
|
—
|
|
(896,799
|
)
|
(591,099
|
)
|
|||||
|
Change in current assets and liabilities
|
(1,571,609
|
)
|
22,065,294
|
|
(576,878
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash from operating activities of continuing operations
|
24,410,610
|
|
43,402,622
|
|
22,066,274
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash from operating activities of discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
1,500
|
|
69,956
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
24,410,610
|
|
43,404,122
|
|
22,136,230
|
|
|||||
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Retirement of patronage dividends
|
611,453
|
|
124,819
|
|
2,724,450
|
|
|||||
|
Decrease in member loans
|
—
|
|
145,707
|
|
1,349
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
29,600
|
|
52,500
|
|
14,000
|
|
|||||
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(5,225,636
|
)
|
(10,981,737
|
)
|
(5,435,284
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used for investing activities of continued operations
|
(4,584,583
|
)
|
(10,658,711
|
)
|
(2,695,485
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash from investing activities of discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
3,500
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(4,584,583
|
)
|
(10,655,211
|
)
|
(2,695,485
|
)
|
|||||
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Change in excess of outstanding checks over bank balances
|
2,933,754
|
|
(7,817,712
|
)
|
12,369,865
|
|
|||||
|
Net (payments) proceeds from seasonal borrowings
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(16,917,303
|
)
|
|||||
|
Distributions to members
|
(15,048,481
|
)
|
(11,001,312
|
)
|
(5,076,105
|
)
|
|||||
|
Decrease in subscriptions receivable
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,259
|
|
|||||
|
Payments for debt issue costs
|
(6,500
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
68,154,464
|
|
20,103,229
|
|
23,157,209
|
|
|||||
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
(68,210,748
|
)
|
(23,289,220
|
)
|
(33,269,494
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
(12,177,511
|
)
|
(22,005,015
|
)
|
(19,733,569
|
)
|
|||||
|
(continued on next page)
|
|||||||||||
F-7
|
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
____________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
7,648,516
|
|
10,743,896
|
|
(292,824
|
)
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
10,743,946
|
|
50
|
|
292,874
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
$
|
18,392,462
|
|
$
|
10,743,946
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
||
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interest
|
$
|
676,739
|
|
$
|
1,044,151
|
|
$
|
1,786,707
|
|
||
|
Income taxes
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note 1 -
Principal Activity and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (the “Company” or “LLC”) processes and sells soybean products, such as soybean oil, meal and hulls. The Company’s principal operations are in Volga, South Dakota.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Urethane Soy Systems Company (USSC), which is the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary. During 2011, the Company determined to discontinue operations of its polyurethane segment, including USSC, and put the assets and business up for sale. On October 16, 2012, USSC’s Board of Directors and the Company’s Board of Managers approved the legal dissolution of USSC, and on December 7, 2012, USSC was formerly dissolved as a corporation. For all periods presented, amounts associated with the polyurethane segment have been classified as discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. See Note 5 for additional information.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investment instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition to be cash equivalents.
Inventories
Finished goods (soybean meal, oil, refined oil, and hulls) and raw materials (soybeans) are valued at estimated market value. This accounting policy is in accordance with the guidelines described in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 905, Agriculture (formerly AICPA Statement of Position No. 85-3, Accounting by Agricultural Producers and Agricultural Cooperatives). Supplies and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market.
Investments
Investments in cooperatives are carried at cost plus the amount of patronage earnings allocated to the Company, less any cash distributions received.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Expenditures for renewals and improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. When depreciable properties are sold or retired, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and the resultant gain or loss is reflected in income.
Depreciation is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets using the straight-line method. The range of the estimated useful lives used in the computation of depreciation is as follows:
|
Building and improvements
|
10-39 years
|
|
Equipment and furnishings
|
3-15 years
|
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, values are reduced to the estimated fair value of those assets.
F-9
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Deferred revenue
The Company recognizes revenues as earned. Amounts received in advance of the period in which service is rendered are recorded as a liability under “Deferred liabilities”.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the title to the related products is transferred to the customer. When a sales contract has delivery terms of ‘FOB Shipping Point’, revenue is recognized when the products are shipped. For those sales contracts with delivery terms of ‘FOB Destination’, revenue is not recognized until the products are delivered to the agreed-upon location. Revenues are presented net of discounts and sales allowances.
Freight
The Company presents all amounts billed to the customer for freight as a component of net revenue. Costs incurred for freight are reported as a component of cost of revenue.
The Company’s “Shipping and Handling Costs” policy is in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (formerly EITF Issue 0-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs).
Advertising costs
Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred
$29,000
,
$28,000
, and
$26,000
, of advertising costs on continuing operations in the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
Environmental remediation
It is management’s opinion that the amount of any potential environmental remediation costs will not be material to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows; therefore, no accrual has been recorded.
Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities
All of the Company’s derivatives are designated as non-hedge derivatives. The futures and options contracts used by the Company are discussed below. Although the contracts may be effective economic hedges of specified risks, they are not designated as, nor accounted for, as hedging instruments.
The Company, as part of its trading activity, uses futures and option contracts offered through regulated commodity exchanges to reduce risk. The Company is exposed to risk of loss in the market value of inventories. To reduce that risk, the Company generally takes opposite and offsetting positions using futures contracts or options.
Unrealized gains and losses on futures and options contracts used to hedge soybean, oil and meal inventories, as well as foreign exchange rates, are recognized as a component of net proceeds for financial reporting. Inventories are recorded at estimated market value. Consequently, unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts are offset by unrealized gains and losses on inventories and reflected in current earnings.
Earnings per capital unit
Earnings per capital unit are calculated based on the weighted average number of capital units outstanding. The Company has no other capital units or other member equity instruments that are dilutive for purposes of calculating earnings per capital unit.
F-10
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Income taxes
As a limited liability company, the Company’s taxable income or loss is allocated to members in accordance with their respective percentage ownership. Therefore, no provision or liability for income taxes has been included in the financial statements.
The Company has evaluated the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 (previously Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes) for uncertain tax positions. As of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, the unrecognized tax benefit accrual was zero.
The Company will recognize future accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense if incurred.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the book value of the Company’s net assets exceeds the tax basis of those assets by approximately
$12.7 million
.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to income tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities for years prior to 2012. We currently have no tax years under examination.
Recent accounting pronouncements
The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements. The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers), which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Management has not yet assessed the impact, if any, of adopting this standard.
The FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03 (Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs), which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Management has not yet assessed the impact, if any, of adopting this standard.
The FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 (Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory), which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Management has not yet assessed the impact, if any, of adopting this standard.
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (Leases). The amendments in this ASU revise the accounting related to lessee accounting. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. The new lease guidance also simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2019 and should be applied through a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. Management has not yet assessed the impact, if any, of adopting this standard.
Accounts receivable are considered past due when payments are not received on a timely basis in accordance with the Company’s credit terms, which is generally
30 days
from invoice date. Accounts considered uncollectible are written off. The Company’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical experience, its evaluation of the current status of receivables, and unusual circumstances, if any.
F-11
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The following table presents the aging analysis of trade receivables as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Past due:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Less than 30 days past due
|
$
|
2,750,039
|
|
$
|
1,732,449
|
|
|
|
30-59 days past due
|
145,276
|
|
430,671
|
|
|||
|
60-89 days past due
|
32,540
|
|
23,500
|
|
|||
|
Greater than 90 days past due
|
776,026
|
|
38,892
|
|
|||
|
Total past due
|
3,703,881
|
|
2,225,512
|
|
|||
|
Current
|
18,698,822
|
|
20,882,304
|
|
|||
|
Totals
|
$
|
22,402,703
|
|
$
|
23,107,816
|
|
|
The following table provides information regarding the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts receivable of continued operations as of
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
Balances, beginning of year
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Amounts charged (credited) to costs and expenses
|
511,404
|
|
1,516,052
|
|
20,487
|
|
|||||
|
Additions (deductions)
|
(16,404
|
)
|
(1,516,052
|
)
|
(20,487
|
)
|
|||||
|
Balances, end of year
|
$
|
495,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
In general cash received is applied to the oldest outstanding invoice first, unless payment is for a specified invoice. The Company, on a case by case basis, may charge a late fee of 1 ½% per month on past due receivables.
The Company’s inventories consist of the following as of
December 31:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Finished goods
|
$
|
19,072,452
|
|
$
|
16,712,923
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
6,984,054
|
|
16,695,668
|
|
|||
|
Supplies & miscellaneous
|
261,726
|
|
279,651
|
|
|||
|
Totals
|
$
|
26,318,232
|
|
$
|
33,688,242
|
|
|
Finished goods and raw materials are valued at estimated market value, which approximates net realizable value. In addition, futures and option contracts are marked to market through cost of revenues, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in the above inventory amounts. Supplies and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market.
The Company has margin deposits with a commodity brokerage firm used to acquire futures and option contracts to manage the price volatility risk of soybeans, crude soybean oil and soybean meal. Consistent with its inventory accounting policy, these contracts are recorded at market value. At
December 31, 2015
, the Company’s futures contracts all mature within
12 months
.
In 2011 the Company determined to discontinue operations of its polyurethane segment, including its wholly-owned subsidiary USSC, and put the assets and business up for sale. The Company decided to discontinue and sell this division primarily because it has incurred significant operating losses over the past several years. Results of operations and the related charges for discontinued operations have been classified as “Loss on discontinued operations” on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations have been
F-12
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
reclassified and reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as “Assets of discontinued operations” and “Liabilities of discontinued operations” accordingly. For comparative purposes, all prior periods presented have been restated to reflect the reclassifications on a consistent basis.
Sales revenue from the polyurethane segment for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
were
$0
,
$0
, and
$2,239
, respectively. During 2012, the Company sold the patents, other intellectual property, and property and equipment, incurring a loss on the sales totaling
$(161,812)
. The gains (losses) from discontinued operations of this division were
$0
,
$0
, and
$9,272
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations are presented separately under the captions “Assets of discontinued division” and “Liabilities of discontinued division,” respectively, in the accompanying balance sheets at December 31,
2015
and
2014
, and consist of the following:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Assets of discontinued division:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Liabilities of discontinued division:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
In 2014, the Company decided to utilize the remaining assets of the discontinued division and reclassified them as property and equipment.
The Company’s investments in cooperatives consist of the following at
December 31:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Minnesota Soybean Processors:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Common stock and Class A Preferred Shares
|
$
|
4,710,159
|
|
$
|
4,785,158
|
|
|
|
Class B Preferred Shares, 8% non-cumulative, convertible
|
—
|
|
575,000
|
|
|||
|
CoBank
|
1,514,849
|
|
1,476,303
|
|
|||
|
Totals
|
$
|
6,225,008
|
|
$
|
6,836,461
|
|
|
During the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, the Company received
$0
and
$124,819
, respectively, from CHS for the retirement of previous retained patronage allocations.
F-13
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The following is a summary of property and equipment at
December 31:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
Net
|
Net
|
||||||||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
543,816
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
543,816
|
|
$
|
443,816
|
|
|||
|
Land improvements
|
1,188,252
|
|
(207,813
|
)
|
980,439
|
|
630,082
|
|
|||||||
|
Buildings and improvements
|
17,618,850
|
|
(7,469,141
|
)
|
10,149,709
|
|
9,610,552
|
|
|||||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
60,527,459
|
|
(33,548,026
|
)
|
26,979,433
|
|
19,191,883
|
|
|||||||
|
Company vehicles
|
127,965
|
|
(51,024
|
)
|
76,941
|
|
43,332
|
|
|||||||
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
1,469,891
|
|
(886,606
|
)
|
583,285
|
|
699,388
|
|
|||||||
|
Construction in progress
|
1,607,454
|
|
—
|
|
1,607,454
|
|
8,131,839
|
|
|||||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
83,083,687
|
|
$
|
(42,162,610
|
)
|
$
|
40,921,077
|
|
$
|
38,750,892
|
|
|||
Depreciation of property and equipment of continued operations amounts to
$2,898,014
,
$2,186,958
, and
$2,057,935
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
The following table provides information regarding the Company’s other intangible assets as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
:
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Intangible Assets
|
Life
|
Cost
|
Amortization
|
Net
|
||||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Loan Origination Costs
|
3 - 7 years
|
$
|
19,700
|
|
$
|
(13,386
|
)
|
$
|
6,314
|
|
||||
|
As of December 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Loan Origination Costs
|
7 years
|
$
|
13,200
|
|
$
|
(8,854
|
)
|
$
|
4,346
|
|
||||
Amortization expense on the loan origination costs amounts to
$4,532
,
$1,932
, and
$1,932
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
Future amortization expense related to the loan origination costs is expected to be approximately:
|
For the years ending December 31:
|
|
||
|
2016
|
$
|
4,532
|
|
|
2017
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
6,314
|
|
The Company has entered into a revolving credit agreement with CoBank which expires
September 30, 2016
. The purpose of the credit agreement is to finance inventory and accounts receivable. Under this agreement, the Company may borrow up to
$15 million
between October 1, 2015 and April 30, 2016 and
$1 million
between May 1 and September 30, 2016. Interest accrues at a variable rate (
2.63%
at
December 31, 2015
). Advances on the revolving credit agreement are secured and limited to qualifying inventory and accounts receivable, net of any accrued commodity purchases. There were
no
advances outstanding at
December 31, 2015
and
2014
. The remaining available funds to borrow under the terms of the revolving credit agreement are approximately
$15,000,000
as of
December 31, 2015
.
F-14
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Revolving term loan from CoBank, interest at variable rates (2.88% and 3.16% at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively), secured by substantially all property and equipment. Loan matures September 20, 2020.
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Note payable to Brookings Regional Railroad Authority, due in annual principal and interest installments of $75,500, interest rate at 2.00%, secured by railroad track assets. Note matures June 1, 2020.
|
845,440
|
|
901,724
|
|
|||
|
845,440
|
|
901,724
|
|
||||
|
Less current maturities
|
(58,344
|
)
|
(57,246
|
)
|
|||
|
Totals
|
$
|
787,096
|
|
$
|
844,478
|
|
|
The Company entered into an agreement as of July 15, 2015 with CoBank to amend and restate its Master Loan Agreement (MLA), which includes both the revolving term and seasonal loans. Under the terms and conditions of the MLA, CoBank agreed to make advances to the Company for up to
$10,000,000
on the revolving term loan. The available commitment decreases in scheduled periodic increments of
$1,250,000
every six months starting March 20, 2017 until maturity on
September 20, 2020
. The Company pays a
0.40%
annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed. There were
no
advances outstanding of the revolving term loan as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
. The remaining commitments available to borrow on the revolving term loan are
$10.0 million
as of
December 31, 2015
.
Under this agreement, the Company is subject to compliance with standard financial covenants and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with all covenants and conditions with CoBank as of
December 31, 2015
.
Effective March 1, 2013, the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation agreed to loan the Brookings County Regional Railway Authority
$964,070
for purposes of making improvements to the railway infrastructure near the Company's soybean processing facility near Volga, South Dakota. In consideration of this secured loan, the Company agreed to provide a guarantee to the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation for the full amount of the loan, plus interest. This guarantee was converted into a direct obligation of the Company's on October 16, 2013, when the Company received the entire loan proceeds and assumed responsibility for paying the annual principal and interest payments.
The minimum principal payments on long-term debt obligations are as follows as of
December 31, 2015
:
|
For the years ending December 31:
|
|
||
|
2016
|
$
|
58,344
|
|
|
2017
|
59,558
|
|
|
|
2018
|
60,749
|
|
|
|
2019
|
61,964
|
|
|
|
2020
|
604,825
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
845,440
|
|
The Company maintains a Section 401(k) plan for employees who meet the eligibility requirements set forth in the plan documents. The Company matches a percentage of an employee's contributed earnings. The amounts charged to expense under continuing operations under this plan were approximately
$157,000
,
$116,000
, and
$125,000
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
The Company's Board of Managers approved payment of a profit-based incentive bonus to be awarded to eligible employees following the close of each fiscal year. The Board has allocated approximately
4.6%
of profits over
$2 million
to fund this benefit. Individual amounts are based upon criteria determined by a formula that considers current pay, level of responsibility, and impact on profits of each position. The amounts charged to expense under continuing
F-15
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
operations under this incentive were approximately
$995,000
,
$815,000
, and
$911,000
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
The Company had a deferred compensation plan for key employees. The plan provided for the Company to pay these employees in five equal annual installments upon retirement. The future payments were discounted at
8%
. In February 2015, the Company approved to eliminate this plan and negotiated a settlement with the one remaining qualified employee. The amount recognized as expense (benefit) during the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
was
$20,000
,
$25,000
,
$10,000
, respectively. The Company made payments of approximately
$71,827
,
$11,827
, and
$11,827
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively. Deferred compensation payable is
$0
and
$51,782
as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
The Company has operating leases for
252
rail cars from GE Capital. The leases require monthly payments of
$100,966
. The Company also leases
157
rail cars from Trinity Capital. These leases require monthly payments of
$75,099
. The Company also leases
64
rail cars from Flagship Rail Services. This lease requires monthly payments of
$27,200
. The Company also leases
15
rail cars from GATX Corporation. This lease requires monthly payments of
$10,050
. The Company also leases
30
rail cars from American Railcar Leasing, Inc. This lease requires monthly payments of
$30,780
. The leases began between 1996 and 2015 and have terms ranging from
5
-
18 years
. Lease expense for all rail cars was
$2,987,265
,
$2,377,908
, and
$2,237,863
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively. Prior to August 1, 2013, the Company generated revenues from the use of
317
of these rail cars on other railroads. Such revenues were
$1,071
,
$679
, and
$760,201
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
On September 1, 2011, the Company renewed a Grain Storage and Transportation Agreement with H&I Grain of Hetland, Inc. (“H&I”). This agreement was for the handling, storage and transportation of soybeans to and from the H&I facilities located in DeSmet, Hetland and Arlington, South Dakota, at established rates per bushel. The agreement provided for an annual minimum payment of
$200,000
. The agreement expired on
August 31, 2014
. Expenses under the agreements with H&I were
$0
,
$404,595
, and
$1,474,568
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
The Company also has a number of other operating leases for machinery and equipment. Rental expense for continuing operations under these other operating leases was
$128,780
,
$126,662
, and
$144,344
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
The following is a schedule of future minimum payments required under these operating commitments.
|
|
Rail Cars
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||
|
Year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2016
|
$
|
2,704,000
|
|
$
|
53,000
|
|
$
|
2,757,000
|
|
||
|
2017
|
2,515,000
|
|
25,000
|
|
2,540,000
|
|
|||||
|
2018
|
1,845,000
|
|
14,000
|
|
1,859,000
|
|
|||||
|
2019
|
1,774,000
|
|
8,000
|
|
1,782,000
|
|
|||||
|
2020
|
1,535,000
|
|
3,000
|
|
1,538,000
|
|
|||||
|
Thereafter
|
668,000
|
|
—
|
|
668,000
|
|
|||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
11,041,000
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
$
|
11,144,000
|
|
||
F-16
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The following is a schedule of changes in assets and liabilities used to determine cash from operating activities:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
(Increase) decrease in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
$
|
1,200,113
|
|
$
|
7,820,461
|
|
$
|
(332,115
|
)
|
||
|
Inventories
|
7,370,010
|
|
31,110,215
|
|
7,671,042
|
|
|||||
|
Margin account deposit
|
(4,917,544
|
)
|
(862,685
|
)
|
(62,615
|
)
|
|||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
(220,800
|
)
|
76,101
|
|
(506,995
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
3,431,779
|
|
38,144,092
|
|
6,769,317
|
|
|||||
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable
|
152,529
|
|
(610,479
|
)
|
117,131
|
|
|||||
|
Accrued commodity purchases
|
(4,688,215
|
)
|
(14,925,455
|
)
|
(7,747,911
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accrued expenses and interest
|
7,772
|
|
(642,710
|
)
|
950,327
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred liabilities
|
(475,474
|
)
|
99,846
|
|
(665,742
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
(5,003,388
|
)
|
(16,078,798
|
)
|
(7,346,195
|
)
|
|||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
(1,571,609
|
)
|
$
|
22,065,294
|
|
$
|
(576,878
|
)
|
||
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual arrangements as a means of managing exposure to changes in commodity prices and, occasionally, foreign exchange rates. The Company’s derivative instruments primarily consist of commodity futures, options and forward contracts. Although these contracts may be effective economic hedges of specified risks, they are not designated as, nor accounted for, as hedging instruments. These contracts are recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value as discussed in Note 15, Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
As of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, the value of the Company’s open futures, options and forward contracts was approximately
$2,211,112
and
$(1,870,229)
, respectively.
|
|
|
Amounts As of December 31, 2015
|
|||||||
|
Balance Sheet
Classification
|
Asset
Derivatives
|
Liability
Derivatives
|
|||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
Current Assets
|
$
|
10,599,610
|
|
$
|
8,296,932
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
Current Assets
|
75,319
|
|
166,885
|
|
||||
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
10,674,929
|
|
$
|
8,463,817
|
|
||
|
|
|
Amounts As of December 31, 2014
|
|||||||
|
Balance Sheet
Classification
|
Asset
Derivatives
|
Liability
Derivatives
|
|||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
Current Assets
|
$
|
8,242,480
|
|
$
|
10,057,448
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
Current Assets
|
50,540
|
|
105,801
|
|
||||
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
8,293,020
|
|
$
|
10,163,249
|
|
||
F-17
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
During the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative transactions were recognized in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:
|
Net Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivative
Activities for the Year Ending December 31:
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
$
|
3,526,586
|
|
$
|
(1,184,594
|
)
|
$
|
1,113,206
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
130,914
|
|
(8,573
|
)
|
9,072
|
|
|||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
3,657,500
|
|
$
|
(1,193,167
|
)
|
$
|
1,122,278
|
|
||
The Company recorded gains (losses) of
$3,657,500
,
$(1,193,167)
, and
$1,122,278
in cost of goods sold related to its commodity derivative instruments for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
defines fair value, establishes a comprehensive framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures which are required about fair value measurements. Specifically, this guidance establishes a hierarchy prioritizing the inputs to valuation techniques, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable value inputs. The three levels of hierarchy and examples are as follows:
|
•
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices, such as equities listed on the New York Stock Exchange and commodity derivative contracts listed on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”).
|
|
•
|
Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs, such as commodity prices using forward future prices.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 – Significant inputs to pricing that are unobservable as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value of financial transmission rights.
|
The following tables set forth financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and the respective levels to which fair value measurements are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
:
|
|
Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Inventory
|
$
|
2,302,679
|
|
$
|
23,489,685
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
25,792,364
|
|
|||
|
Margin deposits
|
$
|
7,467,409
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
7,467,409
|
|
|||
|
Assets of discontinued division
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
F-18
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
Fair Value as of December 31, 2014
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Inventory
|
$
|
(1,814,969
|
)
|
$
|
34,913,326
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
33,098,357
|
|
|||
|
Margin deposits
|
$
|
2,549,865
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,549,865
|
|
|||
|
Assets of discontinued division
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
The Company considers the carrying amount of significant classes of financial instruments on the balance sheets, including cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, notes receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, to be reasonable estimates of fair value due to their length or maturity. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates the carrying value. The interest rates on the long-term debt are similar to rates the Company would be able to obtain currently in the market.
The Company enters into various commodity derivative instruments, including futures, options, swaps and other agreements. The fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives is determined using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments on the CME. The Company estimates the fair market value of their finished goods and raw materials inventories using the market price quotations of similar forward future contracts listed on the CBOT and adjusts for the local market adjustments derived from other grain terminals in our area.
The assets of discontinued division represent a nonrecurring level 3 fair value measurement. The fair value measurements were based on managements’ best estimate of fair market value, which includes comparisons to similar assets within the industry.
The Company has patronage investments in other cooperatives and common stock in a privately held entity. There is no market for their patronage credits or the entity’s common shares, and it is impracticable to estimate fair value of the Company’s investments. These investments are carried on the balance sheet at original cost plus the amount of patronage earnings allocated to the Company, less any cash distributions received.
The following table presents the changes in Level 3 instruments measured on a recurring basis for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
.
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||
|
Beginning balance
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
155,421
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
—
|
|
(150,421
|
)
|
|||
|
Sales
|
—
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Settlements
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Net gains (losses) included in earnings
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
The Company also grants credit to customers throughout the United States and Canada. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. Accounts receivable are generally unsecured. These receivables from continuing operations were
$22,494,957
and
$23,078,461
at
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Soybean meal sales accounted for approximately
61%
,
63%
, and
58%
of total revenues from continuing operations for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively. Soybean oil sales represented approximately
35%
,
33%
, and
38%
of total revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
, respectively.
F-19
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Net revenue by geographic area for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
are as follows:
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
United States
|
$
|
294,345,947
|
|
$
|
335,832,896
|
|
$
|
395,581,058
|
|
||
|
Canada
|
73,214,481
|
|
99,009,280
|
|
73,252,934
|
|
|||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
367,560,428
|
|
$
|
434,842,176
|
|
$
|
468,833,992
|
|
||
A minimum of
2,500
capital units is required for an ownership interest in the Company. Such units are subject to certain transfer restrictions. The Company retains the right to redeem the units at the greater of
$0.20
per unit or the original purchase price less cumulative distributions through the date of redemption in the event a member attempts to dispose of the units in a manner not in conformity with the Operating Agreement,
if a member becomes a holder of less than 2,500 units, or if a member becomes an owner (directly or indirectly) of more than 1.5% of the issued and outstanding capital units.
Earnings, losses and cash distributions are allocated to members based on their percentage of ownership in the Company.
On February 3, 2015, the Company's Board of Managers approved a cash distribution of approximately
$15.0 million
, or
49.3 cent
s per capital unit. The distribution was paid in accordance with the Company's operating agreement and distribution policy on February 5, 2015.
Prior to June 2014, the Company had been accruing member distributions payable due to a provision in the Company's Operating Agreement requiring a minimum distribution of thirty percent (30%) of the previous year's net income. At the Company's Annual Meeting of Members held on June 17, 2014, the members approved a resolution eliminating the minimum distribution; therefore, the Company immediately ceased accruing any liability for member distributions. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had member distributions payable of
$0.0 million
and
$0.0 million
, respectively.
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including without limitation, workers’ compensation claims, tort claims, or contractual disputes. We carry insurance that provides protection against general commercial liability claims, claims against our directors, officers and employees, business interruption, automobile liability, and workers’ compensation claims. We are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings and are not aware of any potential claims.
On November 5, 2015, an incident occurred at the Volga, South Dakota facility which resulted in the death of an outside contractor. The contractor was in the process of installing a catwalk in the vicinity of an oil storage tank when the incident occurred. The Company has reported the accident to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA"), which is conducting an investigation. No civil lawsuit has been filed. The Company has notified its respective insurance carriers.
The Company organizes its business units into two reportable segments: soybean processing and polyurethane. Separate management of each segment is required because each segment is subject to different marketing, production, and technology strategies. The soybean processing segment purchases soybeans and processes them in primarily three products: soybean meal, oil and hulls. The polyurethane segment, which was classified as a discontinued operation in 2011, manufactured a soy-based polyol called Soyol
®
and its resin systems and sold them to the polyurethane industry. The segments’ accounting policies are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Market prices are used to report intersegment sales.
F-20
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Segment information for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
are as follows:
|
Soybean
Processing
|
Polyurethane
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Sales to external customers
|
$
|
367,560,428
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
367,560,428
|
|
|||
|
Intersegment sales
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,902,546
|
|
—
|
|
2,902,546
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
546,648
|
|
—
|
|
546,648
|
|
||||||
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
22,951,836
|
|
—
|
|
22,951,836
|
|
||||||
|
Segment assets
|
122,914,781
|
|
—
|
|
122,914,781
|
|
||||||
|
Expenditures for segment assets
|
5,225,636
|
|
—
|
|
5,225,636
|
|
||||||
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Sales to external customers
|
$
|
434,842,176
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
434,842,176
|
|
|||
|
Intersegment sales
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,188,890
|
|
—
|
|
2,188,890
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
1,076,620
|
|
—
|
|
1,076,620
|
|
||||||
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
20,064,638
|
|
—
|
|
20,064,638
|
|
||||||
|
Segment assets
|
117,137,344
|
|
—
|
|
117,137,344
|
|
||||||
|
Expenditures for segment assets
|
10,981,737
|
|
—
|
|
10,981,737
|
|
||||||
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Sales to external customers
|
$
|
468,833,992
|
|
$
|
2,239
|
|
$
|
468,836,231
|
|
|||
|
Intersegment sales
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,059,867
|
|
—
|
|
2,059,867
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
1,665,339
|
|
—
|
|
1,665,339
|
|
||||||
|
Segment profit (loss)
|
21,181,775
|
|
9,272
|
|
21,191,047
|
|
||||||
|
Segment assets
|
135,001,098
|
|
155,421
|
|
135,156,519
|
|
||||||
|
Expenditures for segment assets
|
5,435,284
|
|
—
|
|
5,435,284
|
|
||||||
Except for the event listed below, we evaluated all of our activity and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in our financial statements or disclosed in the notes to our financial statements.
On January 19, 2016, the Company’s Board of Managers declared a cash distribution to its members of approximately
$15.0 million
. The distribution was issued and paid to members in accordance with the Company's operating agreement and distribution policy on
February 8, 2016
.
F-21
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Control and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIPart IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement SchedulesNote 1 - Principal Activity and Significant Accounting PoliciesNote 2 - Accounts ReceivableNote 3 - InventoriesNote 4 - Margin DepositsNote 5 - Discontinued OperationsNote 6 - Investments in CooperativesNote 7 - Property and EquipmentNote 8 - Other Intangible AssetsNote 9 - Notes Payable - Seasonal LoanNote 10 - Long-term DebtNote 11 - Employee Benefit PlansNote 12 - CommitmentsNote 13 - Cash Flow InformationNote 14 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesNote 15 - Fair Value Of Financial InstrumentsNote 16 - Business Credit Risk and ConcentrationsNote 17 - Members' EquityNote 18 - ContingenciesNote 19 - Business Segment InformationNote 20 - Subsequent Events