SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS LLC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2017
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NO. 000-50253
|
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
South Dakota
|
|
46-0462968
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
100 Caspian Avenue; PO Box 500
Volga, South Dakota |
57071
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
(605) 627-9240
|
|
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
¨
Large Accelerated Filer
|
¨
Accelerated Filer
|
x
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
¨
Smaller Reporting Company
|
|
|
|
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
¨
Yes
x
No
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS
Check whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes
¨
No
¨
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: On
July 25, 2017
, the registrant had 30,419,000 capital units outstanding.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Condensed Financial Statements
June 30, 2017
and
2016
3
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
|||||
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
347,616
|
|
$
|
11,654,648
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
22,113,014
|
|
20,352,581
|
|
|||
|
Inventories
|
24,410,885
|
|
32,393,421
|
|
|||
|
Margin deposits
|
4,952,915
|
|
2,400,892
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
956,727
|
|
1,456,642
|
|
|||
|
Convertible notes receivable
|
2,000,000
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
54,781,157
|
|
70,258,184
|
|
|||
|
Property and equipment
|
98,183,375
|
|
89,832,688
|
|
|||
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(46,729,074
|
)
|
(45,081,548
|
)
|
|||
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
51,454,301
|
|
44,751,140
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Investments in cooperatives
|
6,238,049
|
|
6,231,233
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
112,473,507
|
|
$
|
121,240,557
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Members' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Excess of outstanding checks over bank balance
|
$
|
5,819,396
|
|
$
|
6,643,226
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
60,749
|
|
59,558
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
2,108,498
|
|
1,456,802
|
|
|||
|
Accrued commodity purchases
|
21,933,196
|
|
35,688,152
|
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses
|
1,733,848
|
|
2,380,947
|
|
|||
|
Accrued interest
|
179,418
|
|
201,465
|
|
|||
|
Deferred liabilities - current
|
468,305
|
|
2,033,445
|
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
32,303,410
|
|
48,463,595
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities and unamortized debt issuance costs
|
13,123,969
|
|
724,035
|
|
|||
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6, 7,11 and 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Members' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Class A Units, no par value, 30,419,000 units issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
67,046,128
|
|
72,052,927
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and members' equity
|
$
|
112,473,507
|
|
$
|
121,240,557
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
4
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
For the
Three and Six
-Month Periods Ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
96,465,662
|
|
$
|
97,297,177
|
|
$
|
191,225,003
|
|
$
|
181,995,092
|
|
||||
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Cost of product sold
|
78,765,709
|
|
79,557,550
|
|
156,489,564
|
|
146,393,452
|
|
||||||||
|
Production
|
6,047,833
|
|
5,504,537
|
|
12,026,275
|
|
11,127,389
|
|
||||||||
|
Freight and rail
|
8,611,223
|
|
8,725,616
|
|
16,907,195
|
|
17,489,552
|
|
||||||||
|
Brokerage fees
|
148,956
|
|
187,951
|
|
334,393
|
|
351,299
|
|
||||||||
|
Total cost of revenues
|
93,573,721
|
|
93,975,654
|
|
185,757,427
|
|
175,361,692
|
|
||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
2,891,941
|
|
3,321,523
|
|
5,467,576
|
|
6,633,400
|
|
||||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Administration
|
789,820
|
|
1,069,622
|
|
1,646,071
|
|
1,877,669
|
|
||||||||
|
Operating income
|
2,102,121
|
|
2,251,901
|
|
3,821,505
|
|
4,755,731
|
|
||||||||
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(158,127
|
)
|
(111,236
|
)
|
(310,237
|
)
|
(181,391
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Other non-operating income
|
218,962
|
|
292,326
|
|
435,462
|
|
748,181
|
|
||||||||
|
Patronage dividend income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
493,201
|
|
860,846
|
|
||||||||
|
Total other income (expense)
|
60,835
|
|
181,090
|
|
618,426
|
|
1,427,636
|
|
||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
2,162,956
|
|
2,432,991
|
|
4,439,931
|
|
6,183,367
|
|
||||||||
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(1,941
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,941
|
)
|
6,209
|
|
||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
2,161,015
|
|
$
|
2,432,991
|
|
$
|
4,437,990
|
|
$
|
6,189,576
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Basic and diluted earnings per capital unit
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average number of capital units outstanding for calculation of basic and diluted earnings per capital unit
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
30,419,000
|
|
||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
5
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the
Six Months Ended June 30,
2017
and
2016
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
$
|
4,437,990
|
|
$
|
6,189,576
|
|
|
|
Charges and credits to net income not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,725,230
|
|
1,572,786
|
|
|||
|
Gain on sales of property and equipment
|
(62,955
|
)
|
(131,400
|
)
|
|||
|
Non-cash patronage dividends
|
(6,816
|
)
|
(6,225
|
)
|
|||
|
Change in current assets and liabilities
|
(11,167,551
|
)
|
(9,032,559
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash (used for) operating activities
|
(5,074,102
|
)
|
(1,407,822
|
)
|
|||
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Purchase of convertible note receivable
|
—
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
83,008
|
|
131,400
|
|
|||
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(8,446,123
|
)
|
(1,903,444
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash (used for) investing activities
|
(8,363,115
|
)
|
(2,622,044
|
)
|
|||
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Change in excess of outstanding checks over bank balances
|
(823,830
|
)
|
(3,480,033
|
)
|
|||
|
Distributions to members
|
(9,444,789
|
)
|
(15,048,481
|
)
|
|||
|
Payments for debt issue costs
|
(14,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
62,980,317
|
|
64,299,350
|
|
|||
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
(50,567,513
|
)
|
(59,480,239
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
2,130,185
|
|
(13,709,403
|
)
|
|||
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(11,307,032
|
)
|
(17,739,269
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
11,654,648
|
|
18,392,462
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
347,616
|
|
$
|
653,193
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Interest
|
$
|
332,284
|
|
$
|
278,178
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
$
|
35,861
|
|
$
|
27,770
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
6
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The unaudited condensed financial statements contained herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (the “Company”, “LLC”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying condensed financial statements. The results of operations and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year due in part to the seasonal nature of some of the Company’s businesses. The balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2016
has been derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 2017.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the title to the related products is transferred to the customer. When a sales contract has delivery terms of ‘FOB Shipping Point’, revenue is recognized when the products are shipped. For those sales contracts with delivery terms of ‘FOB Destination’, revenue is not recognized until the products are delivered to the agreed-upon location. Revenues are presented net of discounts and sales allowances.
Recent accounting pronouncements
The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements. The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect of the standard on its financial statements and continues to evaluate the available transition methods. However, based on their initial evaluation, the Company expects to have enhanced disclosures but does not expect there to be material changes to their current Revenue Recognition policies due to the non-complex contracts with their customers. The Company does not plan to adopt the standard until the interim period ended March 31, 2018.
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (Leases). The amendments in this ASU revise the accounting related to lessee accounting. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. The new lease guidance also simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2019 and should be applied through a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the initial stages of evaluating the effect of the standard on their financial statements and continues to evaluate the available transition methods. However, based on their initial evaluation, they do expect there to be material changes to both their current and long-term lease liabilities and fixed assets, because their existing classification of their rail car leases as operating leases will no longer be available to
7
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
use after adoption of this new standard. The Company does not plan to adopt the standard until the interim period ended March 31, 2019.
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 (Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments). The ASU, which addresses eight specific classification issues, is intended to reduce diversity in current practice regarding the manner in which certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the cash flow statement. The standard update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this update but does not anticipate a material impact to its financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year's financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations or members' equity.
Accounts receivable are considered past due when payments are not received on a timely basis in accordance with the Company’s credit terms, which is generally 30 days from invoice date. Accounts considered uncollectible are written off. The Company’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical experience, its evaluation of the current status of receivables, and unusual circumstances, if any.
The following table presents the aging analysis of trade receivables as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
June 30,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
|||||
|
Past due:
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Less than 30 days past due
|
$
|
3,101,734
|
|
$
|
3,537,380
|
|
|
|
30-60 days past due
|
161,201
|
|
109,345
|
|
|||
|
60-90 days past due
|
2,367
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Greater than 90 days past due
|
10,592
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total past due
|
3,275,894
|
|
3,646,725
|
|
|||
|
Current
|
18,837,120
|
|
16,705,856
|
|
|||
|
Totals
|
$
|
22,113,014
|
|
$
|
20,352,581
|
|
|
The following table provides information regarding the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts receivable as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
June 30,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
|||||
|
Balances, beginning of period
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
495,000
|
|
|
|
Amounts charged (credited) to costs and expenses
|
—
|
|
322,065
|
|
|||
|
Additions (deductions)
|
—
|
|
(817,065
|
)
|
|||
|
Balances, end of period
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
In general, cash is applied to the oldest outstanding invoice first, unless payment is for a specified invoice. The Company, on a case by case basis, may charge a late fee of 1 ½% per month on past due receivables.
8
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The Company’s inventories consist of the following at
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
June 30,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
|||||
|
Finished goods
|
$
|
16,960,501
|
|
$
|
19,740,287
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
7,203,906
|
|
12,406,656
|
|
|||
|
Supplies & miscellaneous
|
246,478
|
|
246,478
|
|
|||
|
Totals
|
$
|
24,410,885
|
|
$
|
32,393,421
|
|
|
Finished goods and raw materials are valued at estimated market value, which approximates net realizable value. In addition, futures and option contracts are marked to market through cost of revenues, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in the above inventory amounts. Supplies and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market.
On January 12, 2016, the Company purchased a secured convertible promissory note from Prairie AquaTech, LLC with a face amount of
$750,000
. Interest accrues on the note at the rate of
10%
per annum and will be due with the principal on
December 31, 2017
unless the note is converted earlier.
On July 17, 2016, August 31, 2016, and November 23, 2016, the Company purchased three additional secured convertible promissory notes from Prairie AquaTech totaling
$1,250,000
. Interest accrues on those notes at the rate of
15%
per annum and will be due with the principal on
December 31, 2017
unless the notes are converted earlier. Prairie AquaTech granted the Company
20%
warrant coverage on these three notes. The warrants, which expire on July 15, 2026, have an exercise price of
$0.01
per capital unit. The quantity of capital units the Company is entitled to receive upon exercising their option on their warrants is determined by dividing
250,000
by the pre-money valuation of Prairie AquaTech, excluding a company option pool, before its next round of financing.
The principal amounts on all four notes and, at the option of the Company, all accrued interest will automatically convert into preferred capital units in Prairie AquaTech when it closes its next preferred equity financing prior to the due date of the notes. The quantity of capital units that the Company is entitled to receive upon such conversion is to be determined by dividing the outstanding principal amount and any accrued interest on these notes by
11.00
. The notes are secured by substantially all assets including intellectual property.
The following is a summary of the Company's property and equipment at
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Cost
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
Net
|
Net
|
|||||||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
543,816
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
543,816
|
|
$
|
543,816
|
|
|||
|
Land improvements
|
1,512,308
|
|
(331,274
|
)
|
1,181,034
|
|
1,226,137
|
|
|||||||
|
Buildings and improvements
|
18,919,718
|
|
(8,153,462
|
)
|
10,766,256
|
|
11,001,370
|
|
|||||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
66,446,221
|
|
(37,122,320
|
)
|
29,323,901
|
|
28,746,321
|
|
|||||||
|
Company vehicles
|
123,716
|
|
(79,391
|
)
|
44,325
|
|
54,513
|
|
|||||||
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
1,562,598
|
|
(1,042,627
|
)
|
519,971
|
|
579,195
|
|
|||||||
|
Construction in progress
|
9,074,998
|
|
—
|
|
9,074,998
|
|
2,599,788
|
|
|||||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
98,183,375
|
|
$
|
(46,729,074
|
)
|
$
|
51,454,301
|
|
$
|
44,751,140
|
|
|||
9
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
Depreciation of property and equipment was
$871,113
and
$784,031
for the three months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively, and
$1,722,909
and
$1,570,520
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
The Company has entered into a revolving credit agreement with CoBank which expires
October 1, 2017
. The purpose of the credit agreement is to finance inventory and accounts receivable. Under this agreement, the Company could borrow up
$15 million
until April 30, 2017 and
$5 million
between May 1, 2017 and October 1, 2017. Interest accrues at a variable rate (
3.43%
at
June 30, 2017
). Advances on the revolving credit agreement are secured and limited to qualifying inventory and accounts receivable, net of any accrued commodity purchases. The Company pays a
0.20%
annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed. There were
no
advances outstanding at
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
. The remaining funds available to borrow under the terms of the revolving credit agreement were
$5.0 million
as of
June 30, 2017
.
The following is a summary of the Company's long-term debt at
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
June 30,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
|||||
|
Revolving term loan from CoBank, interest at variable rates (3.68% and 3.23% at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively), secured by substantially all property and equipment. Loan matures September 20, 2023.
|
$
|
12,472,210
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Note payable to Brookings Regional Railroad Authority, due in annual principal and interest installments of $75,500, interest rate at 2.00%, secured by railroad track assets. Note matures June 1, 2020.
|
725,970
|
|
785,376
|
|
|||
|
Total debt before debt issuance costs
|
13,198,180
|
|
785,376
|
|
|||
|
Less current maturities
|
(60,749
|
)
|
(59,558
|
)
|
|||
|
Less debt issuance costs, net of amortization of $538 and $4,532 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
|
(13,462
|
)
|
(1,783
|
)
|
|||
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
13,123,969
|
|
$
|
724,035
|
|
|
The Company entered into an agreement as of March 28, 2017 with CoBank to amend and restate its Credit Agreement, which includes both the revolving term and seasonal loans. Under the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, CoBank agreed to make advances to the Company for up to
$24,000,000
on the revolving term loan with a variable effective interest rate of
3.68%
. The available commitment decreases in scheduled periodic increments of
$2,000,000
every six months starting September 20, 2018 until maturity on
September 20, 2023
. The Company pays a
0.40%
annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed. The debt issuance costs of
$14,000
paid by the Company on this amendment will be amortized over the term of the loan. The principal balance outstanding on the revolving term loan was
$12,472,210
and
$0
as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively. The remaining commitments available to borrow on the revolving term loan are approximately
$11.5 million
as of
June 30, 2017
.
Under this agreement, the Company is subject to compliance with standard financial covenants and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with all covenants and conditions with CoBank as of
June 30, 2017
.
Effective March 1, 2013, the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation agreed to loan the Brookings County Regional Railway Authority
$964,070
for purposes of making improvements to the railway infrastructure near the Company’s soybean processing facility in Volga, South Dakota. In consideration of this secured loan, the Company agreed to provide a guarantee to the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation for the full amount of the loan, plus interest. This guaranty was converted into a direct obligation of the Company’s on October 16, 2013, when the Company received the entire loan proceeds and assumed responsibility for paying the annual principal and interest payments.
10
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The following are minimum principal payments on long-term debt obligations for the twelve-month periods ended
June 30
:
|
2018
|
$
|
60,749
|
|
|
2019
|
61,964
|
|
|
|
2020
|
603,258
|
|
|
|
2021
|
472,209
|
|
|
|
2022
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
13,198,180
|
|
On
January 17, 2017
, the Company’s Board of Managers approved a cash distribution of approximately
$9.4 million
, or
31.0¢
per capital unit. The distribution was paid in accordance with the Company’s operating agreement and distribution policy on
February 3, 2017
.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual arrangements as a means of managing exposure to changes in commodity prices and, occasionally, foreign exchange rates. The Company’s derivative instruments primarily consist of commodity futures, options and forward contracts. Although these contracts may be effective economic hedges of specified risks, they are not designated as, nor accounted for, as hedging instruments. These contracts are recorded on the Company’s condensed balance sheets at fair value as discussed in Note 10, Fair Value.
As of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the value of the Company’s open futures, options and forward contracts was approximately
$(2,691,480)
and
$(1,364,807)
, respectively.
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2017
|
|||||||
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
Current Assets
|
$
|
4,416,017
|
|
$
|
7,075,594
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
Current Assets
|
71,831
|
|
103,734
|
|
||||
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
4,487,848
|
|
$
|
7,179,328
|
|
||
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|||||||
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
Current Assets
|
$
|
3,451,863
|
|
$
|
4,829,001
|
|
||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
Current Assets
|
32,794
|
|
20,463
|
|
||||
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
3,484,657
|
|
$
|
4,849,464
|
|
||
11
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
During the
three and six
-month periods ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative transactions were recognized in the condensed statements of operations as follows:
|
|
Net Gain (Loss) Recognized
on Derivative Activities for the |
Net Gain (Loss) Recognized
on Derivative Activities for the |
|||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||||||||
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Commodity contracts
|
$
|
1,267,071
|
|
$
|
(1,009,099
|
)
|
$
|
3,569,609
|
|
$
|
(3,028,028
|
)
|
|||
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
(150,281
|
)
|
35,161
|
|
57,272
|
|
52,157
|
|
|||||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
1,116,790
|
|
$
|
(973,938
|
)
|
$
|
3,626,881
|
|
$
|
(2,975,871
|
)
|
|||
The Company recorded gains (losses) of
$3,626,881
and
$(2,975,871)
in cost of revenue related to its commodity derivative instruments for the
six
-month periods ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively.
ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
defines fair value, establishes a comprehensive framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures which are required about fair value measurements. Specifically, this guidance establishes a hierarchy prioritizing the inputs to valuation techniques, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable value inputs. The three levels of hierarchy and examples are as follows:
|
•
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices, such as equities listed on the New York Stock Exchange and commodity derivative contracts listed on the Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”).
|
|
•
|
Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs, such as commodity prices using forward future prices.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 – Significant inputs to pricing that are unobservable as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value of financial transmission rights.
|
The following tables set forth financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the condensed balance sheets and the respective levels to which fair value measurements are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
:
|
|
Fair Value as of June 30, 2017
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Inventory
|
$
|
(2,659,577
|
)
|
$
|
26,574,846
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
23,915,269
|
|
|||
|
Margin deposits (deficits)
|
$
|
4,952,915
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,952,915
|
|
|||
12
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
|
|
Fair Value as of December 31, 2016
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Inventory
|
$
|
(1,377,137
|
)
|
$
|
33,159,913
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
31,782,776
|
|
|||
|
Margin deposits
|
$
|
2,400,892
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,400,892
|
|
|||
The Company considers the carrying amount of significant classes of financial instruments on the balance sheets, including cash, accounts receivable, notes receivable, and accounts payable, to be reasonable estimates of fair value due to their length or maturity. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates the carrying value. The interest rates on the long-term debt are similar to rates the Company would be able to obtain currently in the market.
The Company enters into various commodity derivative instruments, including futures, options, swaps and other agreements. The fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives is determined using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments on the CBOT. The Company estimates the fair market value of their finished goods and raw materials inventories using the market price quotations of similar forward future contracts listed on the CBOT and adjusts for the local market adjustments derived from other grain terminals in our area. This market adjustment caused a negative balance in the Level 1 inventory as of
June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016.
The Company has patronage investments in other cooperatives and common stock in a privately held entity. There is no market for their patronage credits or the entity’s common shares, and it is impracticable to estimate fair value of the Company’s investments. These investments are carried on the balance sheet at original cost plus the amount of patronage earnings allocated to the Company, less any cash distributions received.
As of
June 30, 2017
, the Company had unpaid commitments of approximately
$2.1 million
for construction and acquisition of property and equipment, all of which is expected to be incurred by October 2017.
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, the Company may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including without limitation, workers’ compensation claims, tort claims, or contractual dispute. The Company carries insurance that provides protection against general commercial liability claims, claims against our directors, officer and employees, business interruption, automobile liability, and workers' compensation. Except for the event listed below, the Company is not currently involved in any material legal proceedings and are not aware of any potential claims.
On November 5, 2015, an incident occurred at our facility in Volga, South Dakota which resulted in the death of an outside contractor. The contractor was in the process of installing a catwalk in the vicinity of an oil storage tank when the incident occurred. No other injuries were reported, and property damage from the accident was limited to the tank and surrounding piping. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") initiated an investigation into the incident and later cited the Company for
six
violations along with assessing a fine of
$22,565
. On April 21, 2017, the Company was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota. The plaintiffs, the heirs of the deceased contractor, allege that the Company did not exercise ordinary care and awareness at the time of the incident, thus resulting in the contractor's death. The plaintiffs are seeking relief of an undisclosed amount for compensatory, general and special damages; reimbursement of burial, funeral and legal costs; and any other relief the court determines. The Company has notified our respective insurance carriers. Based upon its investigation of the facts surrounding this case, management believes that the Company did not breach any duties owed to the decedent nor owe any money or other relief to the plaintiffs. Management is unable to assure, however, that the Company will be successful in disposing of the case or that any costs of a settlement or damages awarded by a court would not be material.
13
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The Company evaluated all of its activities and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in its financial statements or disclosed in the notes to its financial statements.
14
Forward-Looking Statements
The information in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, (including reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”), contains “forward-looking statements” that deal with future results, expectations, plans and performance, and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
. Forward-looking statements may include statements which use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “predict,” “hope,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “future,” “potential,” or the negatives of these words, and all similar expressions. Forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Actual results or actual business or other conditions may differ materially from those contemplated by any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements are identified in our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
We are not under any duty to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report, nor do we guarantee future results or performance or what future business conditions will be like. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.
Executive Overview and Summary
We recorded a net income of $4.4 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to a net income of $6.2 million during the same period in 2016. Although revenues increased by approximately $9.2 million in 2017, gross profit decreased by $1.2 million. Gross profit decreased between periods primarily from a decrease in processing margins due to a deteriorating demand for soybean meal, increased production costs, and a decrease in the amount of soybeans processed. Even though the U.S. had a record soybean crop in 2016, demand for soybean meal within our domestic market has only been steady in 2017 and slightly worsened on the export side. Exports of soybean meal deteriorated mainly due to a large South American soybean crop. A production oversupply of soybean meal, resulting from our and other plants operating at a high processing rate, further contributed to the demand imbalance. In contrast, demand for refined soybean oil within the food sector remained steady in 2017, and demand from the biodiesel sector has slowly increased in 2017. Demand from the biodiesel industry was affected principally by uncertainties concerning the future of the U.S. renewable fuel program as the market searched, and continues to search, for clarity on how these programs and policies will play out in the future.
Our soybean processing facility near Miller, South Dakota, experienced small but steady increases in demand for non-GMO soybean meal and oil. We anticipate that our need for non-GMO soybeans will continue to grow and we will continue to actively encourage producers to join current producers growing these beans.
We continue to invest into plant operation in effort to improve operations, decrease costs and maintain our competitiveness in the future. In the first six months of 2017, we invested over $8.4 million on capital improvements at our two facilities. One of the major capital improvement projects is the second phase of our new soybean receiving complex which we expect to have completed in the third quarter of 2017.
15
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the three-months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
|
||||||||||
|
|
$
|
% of Revenue
|
$
|
% of Revenue
|
||||||||
|
Revenue
|
96,465,662
|
|
100.0
|
|
97,297,177
|
|
100.0
|
|
||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
(93,573,721
|
)
|
(97.0
|
)
|
(93,975,654
|
)
|
(96.6
|
)
|
||||
|
Operating expenses
|
(789,820
|
)
|
(0.8
|
)
|
(1,069,622
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)
|
||||
|
Other income (expense)
|
60,835
|
|
0.1
|
|
181,090
|
|
0.2
|
|
||||
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(1,941
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
2,161,015
|
|
2.2
|
|
2,432,991
|
|
2.5
|
|
|||
Revenue
– Revenue decreased $832,000, or 0.9%, for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to a 3.4% decrease in the quantity of soybeans processed, which decreased the sales volume of our soybean products. This decrease in production is largely due to a deterioration in soybean quality caused by excessive moisture, which required us to slow our production rate in order to meet our customers' quality specifications.
Gross Profit/Loss
– Gross profit decreased $430,000, or 12.9%, for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease in gross profit is primarily due to a weakened demand for soybean meal and an increase in production costs. Weak meal demand resulted from a reduction in soybean exports, high capacity utilization rates in the U.S which produced an oversupply of meal in early 2017, and the availability of less expensive feed sources such as canola meal and distillers grains. Production expenses also increased $543,000 due primarily to increases in energy and maintenance costs at our Miller, South Dakota, facility.
Operating Expenses
– Administrative expenses, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, decreased $280,000, or 26.2%, for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease is mostly due to accruing a $338,000 allowance for a potentially uncollectible account receivable in 2016, compared to $0 in the same period in 2017.
Interest Expense
– Interest expense increased $47,000, or 42.2%, during the three months ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in interest expense is due primarily to increased borrowings, which resulted from, or are associated with, increases in inventory quantities, commodity prices, and capital investments, and an increase in interest rates on our senior debt with CoBank. The average debt level during the three-month period ended
June 30, 2017
was approximately $16.7 million, compared to $14.5 million for the same period in 2016. As of
June 30, 2017
, the interest rate on our revolving long-term loan was 3.68%, compared to 2.90% as of June 30, 2016.
Other Non-Operating Income
– Other non-operating income, including patronage dividend income, decreased $73,000, or 25.1%, during the three months ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in oil storage income arising from our issuance of warehouse receipts on CBOT soybean oil contracts. We stored less oil on CBOT oil contracts in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016, thus decreasing oil storage income in the second quarter of 2017.
Net Income/Loss
– During the quarter ended
June 30, 2017
, we generated a net income of $2.2 million, compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2016. The $0.2 million decrease in net income is primarily attributable to a decrease in gross profit associated with a deteriorating demand for soybean meal, an increase in production and interest expenses, and a decrease in other non-operating income.
16
Comparison of the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
|
|||||||||||
|
|
$
|
% of Revenue
|
$
|
% of Revenue
|
|||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
191,225,003
|
|
100.0
|
|
$
|
181,995,092
|
|
100.0
|
|
|||
|
Cost of revenues
|
(185,757,427
|
)
|
(97.1
|
)
|
(175,361,692
|
)
|
(96.4
|
)
|
|||||
|
Operating expenses
|
(1,646,071
|
)
|
(0.9
|
)
|
(1,877,669
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other income (expense)
|
618,426
|
|
0.3
|
|
1,427,636
|
|
0.8
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(1,941
|
)
|
—
|
|
6,209
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
4,437,990
|
|
2.3
|
|
$
|
6,189,576
|
|
3.4
|
|
|||
Revenue
– Revenue increased $9.2 million, or 5.1%, for the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in revenues is primarily due to an increase in the sales price of all our commodity soybean products (meal, oil and hulls) in early 2017. The increase in sales price is primarily due to the uncertainty of the South American crop resulting from planting delays in Argentina caused by wet weather, and a general willingness of commodity funds to own soybeans and soybean-based products. The increase in revenue is partially offset by a 3.5% decrease in the quantity of soybeans processed, which decreased the sales volume of our soybean products. Production decreased largely because a deterioration in soybean quality (excessive moisture) which required us to slow our production rate in order to meet our customers' quality specifications.
Gross Profit/Loss
– Gross profit decreased $1.2 million, or 17.6%, for the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease in gross profit is primarily due to a weakened demand for soybean meal and an increase in production costs. Weak demand resulted from a reduction in soybean exports, high capacity utilization rates in the U.S which produced an oversupply of meal during the first half of 2017, and the availability of less expensive feed sources such as canola meal and distillers grains. Production expenses also increased $899,000 due primarily to increases in energy and maintenance costs at our Miller, South Dakota, facility.
Operating Expenses
– Administrative expenses, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, decreased $232,000, or 12.3%, for the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease is mostly due to accruing a $338,000 allowance for a potentially uncollectible account receivable in 2016, compared to $0 in the same period in 2017.
Interest Expense
– Interest expense increased $129,000, or 71.0%, during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in interest expense is due primarily to an increase in interest rates on our senior debt with CoBank and increased borrowings, which resulted from, or are associated with, increases in inventory quantities, commodity prices, and capital investments. As of
June 30, 2017
, the interest rate on our revolving long-term loan was 3.68%, compared to 2.90% as of June 30, 2016. The average debt level during the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
was approximately $18.1 million, compared to $11.9 million for the same period in 2016.
Other Non-Operating Income
– Other non-operating income, including patronage dividend income, decreased $680,000, or 42.3%, during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease is primarily due to decreases in patronage dividend income and oil storage income arising from our issuance of warehouse receipts on CBOT soybean oil contracts. During the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, patronage allocations from our associated cooperatives, including Minnesota Soybean Processors and CoBank, totaled $493,000, compared to $861,000 during the same period in 2016. We also stored less oil on CBOT oil contracts in the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016, thus decreasing oil storage income in 2017.
Net Income/Loss
– During the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, we generated a net income of $4.4 million, compared to $6.2 million for the same period in 2016. The $1.8 million decrease in net income is primarily attributable to a decrease in gross profit associated with a deteriorating demand for soybean meal, an increase in production and interest expenses, and a decrease in other non-operating income.
17
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and borrowings under our two lines of credit which are discussed below under “Indebtedness.” On
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, we had working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, of approximately $22.5 million and $22.9 million, respectively. While working capital was positively affected by approximately $10.8 million in net income and $12.4 million in net proceeds from long-term debt since
June 30, 2016
, it was offset during the same period by a $9.4 million distribution to members, $13.6 million in purchases of property and equipment, and $1.2 million in purchases of convertible notes receivable in Prairie Aqua-Tech, LLC, a start-up company engaged in the research and development of animal protein derived from agricultural products like soybeans. Based on our current operating plans, we believe that we will be able to fund our operating and capital needs for the foreseeable future from cash from operations and revolving lines of credit.
The following is a summary of our cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities for each of the
six
-month periods ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Net cash used for operating activities
|
$
|
(5,074,102
|
)
|
$
|
(1,407,822
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(8,363,115
|
)
|
(2,622,044
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
2,130,185
|
|
(13,709,403
|
)
|
|||
Cash Flows Provided By Operations
The $3.7 million increase in cash flows used for operating activities is attributed to a $2.8 million increase in margin deposits and a $1.8 million decrease in net income during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. During the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, margin deposits increased by approximately $2.5 million, compared to a $0.3 million decrease during the same period in
2016
.
Cash Flows Used For Investing Activities
The $5.7 million increase in cash flows used for investing activities is primarily due to a $6.5 million increase on capital improvements during the
six
-month period ended
June 30, 2017
, compared to the same period in 2016. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
, we spent approximately $8.4 million on capital improvements, compared to $1.9 million during the same period in 2016. Partially offsetting the increased capital improvements is an $850,000 decrease in the purchase of convertible notes receivable. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we purchased $750,000 in convertible notes from Prairie AquaTech compared to $0 during the same period in 2017.
Cash Flows Used For Financing Activities
The $15.8 million change in cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities is principally due to a $10.2 million decrease in net proceeds (payments) on borrowings and a $5.6 million decrease in distributions to members. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
, net proceeds on borrowings increased $11.6 million, compared to $1.4 million during the same period in 2016.
Indebtedness
We have two lines of credit with CoBank, our primary lender, to meet the short and long-term needs of our operations. The first credit line is a revolving long-term loan. Under the terms of this loan, we may borrow funds as needed up to the credit line maximum, or $24.0 million, and then pay down the principal whenever excess cash is available. Repaid amounts may be borrowed up to the available credit line. Beginning on September 20, 2018, the available credit line is reduced by $2.0 million every six months until the credit line’s maturity on September 20, 2023. We pay a 0.40% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed. The principal balance outstanding on the revolving term loan is $12.5 million and $0 as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
. Under this loan,
$11.5 million
in additional funds was available to be borrowed as of
June 30, 2017
.
The second credit line is a revolving working capital (seasonal) loan that matures on October 1, 2017. The primary purpose of this loan is to finance inventory and receivables. The maximum available to borrow under this credit line was $15 million until May 1, 2017, at which time it decreased to $5 million until the loan's maturity date. Borrowing
18
base reports and financial statements are required monthly to justify the balance borrowed on this line. We pay a 0.20% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed; however, we have the option to reduce the credit line during any given commitment period listed in the agreement to avoid the commitment fee. There were no advances outstanding on the working capital loan as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, making
$5.0 million
available to be borrowed as of
June 30, 2017
.
Both loans with CoBank are set up with a variable rate option. The variable rate is set by CoBank and changes weekly on the first business day of each week. We also have a fixed rate option on both loans allowing us to fix rates for any period between one day and the entire commitment period. The annual interest rate on the revolving term loan is
3.68%
and
3.23%
as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively. As of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the interest rate on the seasonal loan is
3.43%
and
2.98%
, respectively. We were in compliance with all covenants and conditions under the loans as of
June 30, 2017
and the date of this filing.
On March 1, 2013, the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation agreed to loan the Brookings County Regional Railway Authority a sum of $964,070 for purposes of making improvements to the railway infrastructure near our soybean processing facility in Volga, South Dakota. In consideration of this secured loan, we agreed to provide a guarantee to the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation for the full amount of the loan, plus 2% interest. This guarantee was later converted into a direct debt obligation of ours on October 16, 2013, when we received the $964,070 in loan proceeds and assumed responsibility for the loan's annual principal and interest payments of $75,500 which began on June 1, 2014. The note payable matures on June 1, 2020. The principal balance outstanding on this loan was
$725,970
as of
June 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
OFF BALANCE SHEET FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Except as described below, we do not utilize variable interest entities or other off-balance sheet financial arrangements.
Lease Commitments
We have commitments under various operating leases for rail cars, various types of vehicles, and lab and office equipment. Our most significant lease commitments are for the rail cars we use to distribute our products. We have several long-term leases for hopper rail cars and oil tank cars with American Railcar Leasing, FRS 1, GATX Corporation, Trinity Capital and Wells Fargo Rail. Total lease expenses under these arrangements are approximately $1.6 million for each of the
six
-month periods ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
.
In addition to rail car leases, we have a few operating leases for various equipment and storage facilities. Total lease expense under these arrangements are $19,000 and $37,000 for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. Some of our leases include purchase options, none of which, however, are for a value less than fair market value at the end of the lease.
Contractual Obligations
The following table shows our contractual obligations for the periods presented:
|
Payment due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations (1)
|
$
|
23,475,000
|
|
$
|
543,000
|
|
$
|
1,626,000
|
|
$
|
13,156,000
|
|
$
|
8,150,000
|
|
|||||
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
10,241,000
|
|
2,808,000
|
|
4,814,000
|
|
2,567,000
|
|
52,000
|
|
||||||||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
33,716,000
|
|
$
|
3,351,000
|
|
$
|
6,440,000
|
|
$
|
15,723,000
|
|
$
|
8,202,000
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Represents principal and interest payments on our notes payable, which are included on our Balance Sheet.
|
19
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 1 of our Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, for a discussion on the impact, if any, of the recently pronounced accounting standards.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Preparation of our financial statements requires estimates and judgments to be made that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. We continually evaluate these estimates based on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The difficulty in applying these policies arises from the assumptions, estimates, and judgments that have to be made currently about matters that are inherently uncertain, such as future economic conditions, operating results and valuations as well as management intentions. As the difficulty increases, the level of precision decreases, meaning that actual results can and probably will be different from those currently estimated.
Of the significant accounting policies described in the notes to the financial statements, we believe that the following may involve a higher degree of estimates, judgments, and complexity:
Commitments and Contingencies
Contingencies, by their nature relate to uncertainties that require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred, as well as in estimating the amount of the potential expense. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S, we accrue an expense when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Inventory Valuation
We account for our inventories at estimated market value. These inventories are agricultural commodities that are freely traded, have quoted market prices, may be sold without significant further processing, and have predictable and insignificant costs of disposal. We derive our estimates from local market prices determined by grain terminals in our area. Processed product price estimates are determined by the ending sales contract price. This price is determined by the average closing price on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), net of the local basis, for the last two business days of the period and the first business day of the subsequent period. Changes in the market values of these inventories are recognized as a component of cost of goods sold.
Long-Lived Assets
Depreciation and amortization of our property, plant and equipment is provided on the straight-lined method by charges to operations at rates based upon the expected useful lives of individual or groups of assets. Economic circumstances or other factors may cause management’s estimates of expected useful lives to differ from actual.
Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and investments are evaluated for impairment on the basis of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impaired asset is written down to its estimated fair market value based on the best information available. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate undiscounted future cash flows and may differ from actual.
We evaluate the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, (2) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or (3) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. We measure the carrying amount of the asset against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with it. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value of the asset being evaluated, an impairment loss would be recognized.
20
The impairment loss is calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeded its fair value. The fair value is measured based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The evaluation of asset impairment requires us to make assumptions about future cash flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We minimize the effects of changes in the price of agricultural commodities by using exchange-traded futures and options contracts to minimize our net positions in these inventories and contracts. We account for changes in market value on exchange-traded futures and option contracts at exchange prices and account for the changes in value of forward purchase and sales contracts at local market prices determined by grain terminals in the area. Changes in the market value of all these contracts are recognized in earnings as a component of cost of goods sold.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the title to the related products is transferred to the customer. When a sales contract has delivery terms of ‘FOB Shipping Point’, revenue is recognized when the products are shipped. For those sales contracts with delivery terms of ‘FOB Destination’, revenue is not recognized until the products are delivered to the agreed-upon location. Revenues are presented net of discounts and sales allowances.
Commodities Risk & Risk Management.
To reduce the price change risks associated with holding fixed price commodity positions, we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts (either a straight or options futures contract) on a regulated commodity futures exchange, the CBOT. While hedging activities reduce the risk of loss from changing market prices, such activities also limit the gain potential which otherwise could result from these significant fluctuations in market prices. Our policy is generally to maintain a hedged position within limits, but we can be long or short at any time. Our profitability is primarily derived from margins on soybeans processed, not from hedging transactions. We do not anticipate that our hedging activity will have a significant impact on future operating results or liquidity. Hedging arrangements do not protect against nonperformance of a cash contract.
At any one time, our inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to our facility may be substantial. We have risk management policies and procedures that include net position limits. They are defined by commodity, and include both trader and management limits. This policy and procedure triggers a review by management when any trader is outside of position limits. The position limits are reviewed at least annually with the board of managers. We monitor current market conditions and may expand or reduce the limits in response to changes in those conditions.
An adverse change in market prices would not materially affect our profitability since we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures and forward contracts as economic hedges of price risk.
Foreign Currency Risk.
We conduct essentially all of our business in U.S. dollars and have minimal direct risk regarding foreign currency fluctuations. Foreign currency fluctuations do, however, impact the ability of foreign buyers to purchase U.S. agricultural products and the competitiveness of and demand for U.S. agricultural products compared to the same products offered by foreign suppliers.
An adverse change in market prices would not materially affect our profitability since we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures and forward contracts as economic hedges of price risk.
Interest Rate Risk.
We manage exposure to interest rate changes by using variable rate loan agreements with fixed rate options. Long-term loan agreements can utilize the fixed option through maturity; however, the revolving ability to pay down and borrow back would be eliminated once the funds were fixed.
As of
June 30, 2017
, we had
$725,970
in fixed rate debt and $29 million of variable rate debt available to borrow. Interest rate changes impact the amount of our interest payments and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows. Assuming other variables remain constant, a one percentage point (1%) increase in interest rates on our variable rate debt could have an estimated impact on profitability of approximately $290,000 per year.
21
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended
June 30, 2017
.
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including without limitation, workers’ compensation claims, tort claims, or contractual dispute. We carry insurance that provides protection against general commercial liability claims, claims against our directors, officer and employees, business interruption, automobile liability, and workers' compensation. Except for the event listed below, we are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings and are not aware of any potential claims.
On November 5, 2015, an incident occurred at our facility in Volga, South Dakota which resulted in the death of an outside contractor. The contractor was in the process of installing a catwalk in the vicinity of an oil storage tank when the incident occurred. No other injuries were reported, and property damage from the accident was limited to the tank and surrounding piping. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") initiated an investigation into the incident and later cited us for seven violations along with assessing a fine of $22,565. On April 21, 2017, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota. The plaintiffs, the heirs of the deceased contractor, allege that we did not exercise ordinary care and awareness at the time of the incident, thus resulting in his death. The plaintiffs are seeking relief of an undisclosed amount for compensatory, general and special damages; reimbursement of burial, funeral and legal costs; and any other relief the court may determine. We have notified our respective insurance carriers. Based upon our investigation of the facts surrounding this case, we believe that we did not breach any duties owed to the decedent nor owe any money or other relief to the plaintiffs. There is no assurance, however, we will be successful in disposing of the case or that any costs of a settlement or damages awarded by a court would not be material.
During the quarter ended
June 30, 2017
, there were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in Item 1A (Part I) of our
2016
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
None.
None.
None.
None.
22
See Exhibit Index.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
July 25, 2017
|
By
|
/s/ Thomas Kersting
|
|
|
|
Thomas Kersting, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
|
|
|||
|
Dated:
|
July 25, 2017
|
By
|
/s/ Mark Hyde
|
|
|
|
Mark Hyde, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
23
EXHIBIT INDEX TO
FORM 10-Q
OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
|
3.1(i)
|
Articles of Organization (1)
|
|
|
3.1(ii)
|
Operating Agreement, as amended (2)
|
|
|
3.1(iii)
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Organization (3)
|
|
|
4.1
|
Form of Class A Unit Certificate (4)
|
|
|
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
|
|
____________________________________________________________________________
(1) Incorporated by reference from Appendix B to the information statement/prospectus filed as a part of the issuer’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-75804).
(2) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuer’s Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2017.
(3) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuer’s Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2002.
(4) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuer’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-75804).
24
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I Financial InformationItem 1. Financial StatementsNote 1 - Principal Activity and Significant Accounting PoliciesNote 2 - Accounts ReceivableNote 3 - InventoriesNote 4 - Convertible Notes ReceivableNote 5 - Property and EquipmentNote 6 - Note Payable Seasonal LoanNote 7 - Long-term DebtNote 8 - Member DistributionNote 9 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesNote 10 - Fair ValueNote 11 - CommitmentsNote 12 - ContingenciesNote 13 - Subsequent EventItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 4. Controls and ProceduresPart II Other InformationItem 1. Legal ProceedingsItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsItem 3. Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresItem 5. Other InformationItem 6. Exhibits