SKINVISIBLE, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
[X]
|
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
[ ]
|
Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
For the transition period from __________ to __________
|
|
|
Commission File Number:
000-25911
|
Skinvisible, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Nevada
|
88-0344219
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, NV 89120
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
702.433.7154
|
|
(Registrant’s telephone number)
|
|
_______________________________________________________________
|
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days [
X
] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [
X
]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
|
[ ] Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer
|
[ ] Non-accelerated filer
|
|
[
X
] Smaller reporting company
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [
X
] No
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 101,673,759 common shares as of March 31, 2010.
|
Page
|
||
|
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
|
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2011
(UNAUDITED) AND
DECEMBER 31, 2010 (AUDITED)
|
ASSETS
|
March 31, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
|
Current assets
|
||||||||
|
Cash
|
$ | 1,351 | $ | 2,481 | ||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
250,000 | -- | ||||||
|
Inventory
|
16,157 | 16,595 | ||||||
|
Due from related party
|
1,145 | 1,145 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets
|
25,513 | 14,003 | ||||||
|
Total current assets
|
294,166 | 34,224 | ||||||
|
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $328,852 and $328,369,
respectively
|
6,866 | 7,349 | ||||||
|
Intangible and other assets
|
||||||||
|
Patents and trademarks, net of accumulated amortization of $122,602
and $107,941, respectively
|
231,363 | 231,441 | ||||||
|
License and distributor rights
|
-- | -- | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 532,395 | $ | 273,014 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
|
Current liabilities
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 659,348 | $ | 638,717 | ||||
|
Accrued interest payable
|
24,524 | 5,150 | ||||||
|
Loans payable
|
25,456 | -- | ||||||
|
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $-0-
and $3,477, respectively
|
57,993 | 108,965 | ||||||
|
Convertible notes payable related party, net of unamortized discount of $403,722
and $538,295,
respectively
|
383,955 | 249,383 | ||||||
|
Unearned revenue
|
475,315 | 302,815 | ||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
1,626,591 | 1,305,030 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
1,626,591 | 1,305,030 | ||||||
|
Stockholders' deficit
|
||||||||
|
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized
|
||||||||
|
101,673,759 and 97,518,259 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010,
respectively
|
101,675 | 97,520 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
18,829,623 | 18,628,922 | ||||||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(20,025,494 | ) | (19,758,458 | ) | ||||
|
Total stockholders' deficit
|
(1,094,196 | ) | (1,032,016 | ) | ||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ | 532,395 | $ | 273,014 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
(UNAUDITED)
|
Three months ended
|
||||||||
|
March 31, 2011
|
March 31, 2010
|
|||||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
|
Revenues
|
$ | 80,355 | $ | 158,230 | ||||
|
Cost of revenues
|
438 | 4,196 | ||||||
|
Gross profit
|
79,917 | 154,034 | ||||||
|
Operating expenses
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
15,144 | 6,785 | ||||||
|
Selling general and administrative
|
$ | 308,859 | $ | 208,625 | ||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
324,003 | 215,410 | ||||||
|
Loss from operations
|
(244,086 | ) | (61,376 | ) | ||||
|
Other income (expense)
|
||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(22,950 | ) | (70,343 | ) | ||||
|
Total other income (expense)
|
(22,950 | ) | (70,343 | ) | ||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
-- | -- | ||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (267,036 | ) | $ | (131,719 | ) | ||
|
Basic loss per common share
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||
|
Basic weighted average common
shares outstanding
|
100,295,748 | 95,201,637 | ||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in Capital
|
Deficit
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
97,518,259 | $ | 97,520 | $ | 18,628,922 | $ | (19,758,458 | ) | $ | (1,032,016 | ) | |||||||||
|
Issuance of stock for cash
|
1,287,500 | 1,287 | 61,713 | - | 63,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of stock for conversion of debts
|
1,402,000 | 1,402 | 54,654 | - | 56,056 | |||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of stock for services
|
1,466,000 | 1,466 | 84,334 | - | 85,800 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
- | - | - | (267,036 | ) | (267,036 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Balance, March 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
101,673,759 | $ | 101,675 | $ | 18,829,623 | $ | (20,025,494 | ) | $ | (1,094,196 | ) | |||||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
(UNAUDITED)
|
Three months ended
|
||||||||
|
March 31, 2011
|
March 31, 2010
|
|||||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (267,036 | ) | $ | (131,719 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
15,144 | 6,785 | ||||||
|
Stock based compensation
|
85,800 | 43,668 | ||||||
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
139,503 | -- | ||||||
|
Interest expense paid with common stock
|
-- | 25,000 | ||||||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
(Increase) decrease in inventory
|
438 | (4,229 | ) | |||||
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
|
(250,000 | ) | (93,947 | ) | ||||
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(11,510 | ) | (14,804 | ) | ||||
|
(Increase) decrease in related party receivable
|
-- | 2,018 | ||||||
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
20,630 | 133,145 | ||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest
|
19,784 | -- | ||||||
|
(Decrease) in unearned revenue
|
172,500 | (2,750 | ) | |||||
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(74,747 | ) | (36,833 | ) | ||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Purchase of fixed assets and intangible assets
|
(14,583 | ) | (58,612 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(14,583 | ) | (58,612 | ) | ||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock
|
63,000 | -- | ||||||
|
Proceeds from, net of payments to, related parties for loans
|
-- | 72,000 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from convertible notes payable
|
-- | 1,635 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from loans
|
25,200 | -- | ||||||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
88,200 | 73,635 | ||||||
|
Net change in cash
|
(1,130 | ) | (21,810 | ) | ||||
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
2,481 | 25,868 | ||||||
|
Cash, end of period
|
$ | 1,351 | $ | 4,058 | ||||
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
|
Non-cash investing and financing ativities:
|
||||||||
|
Common stock issued on conversion of debts
|
$ | 56,056 | $ | - | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES
|
Description of business
– Skinvisible, Inc., (referred to as the “Company”) is focused on the development and manufacture of innovative topical polymer-based delivery system technologies and formulations incorporating its patent-pending formula/process for combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer emulsions. The technologies and formulations have broad industry applications within the pharmaceutical, over-the-counter, personal skincare and cosmetic arenas. The Company’s antibacterial/antimicrobial hand sanitizer formulations, available for private label commercialization opportunities, offer skincare solutions for the healthcare, food service, industrial, cosmetic and salon industries, as well as for personal use in the retail marketplace. The Company maintains manufacturing, executive and sales offices in Las Vegas, Nevada.
History
– Skinvisible, Inc. ( referred to as the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on March 6, 1998 under the name of Microbial Solutions, Inc. The Company underwent a name change on February 26, 1999, when it changed its name to Skinvisible, Inc. The Company’s subsidiary’s name of Manloe Labs, Inc. was also changed to Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Skinvisible, Inc. together with its subsidiary shall herein be collectively referred to as the “Company”.
Going concern
– The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of $20,025,494 since its inception and requires capital for its contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.
Principles of consolidation
– The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates
– The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue recognition
Product sales
– Revenues from the sale of products are recognized when title to the products are transferred to the customer and only when no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive reasonably assured payments for products sold and delivered.
Royalty sales
– The Company also recognizes royalty revenue from licensing its patent and trademarks, only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.
Distribution and license rights sales
– The Company also recognizes revenue from distribution and license rights only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.
Costs of Revenue
–
Cost of revenue includes raw materials, component parts, and shipping supplies. Shipping and handling costs is not a significant portion of the cost of revenue.
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES - (continued)
|
Accounts Receivable
–
Accounts receivable is comprised of uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reviewed periodically for collectability. If management determines that collection is unlikely, an allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected is recorded. Management reviews each accounts receivable balance that exceeds 30 days from the invoice date and, based on an assessment of creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts.
Inventory
– Substantially all inventory consists of finished goods and are valued based upon first-in first-out ("FIFO") cost, not in excess of market. The determination of whether the carrying amount of inventory requires a write-down is based on an evaluation of inventory.
Goodwill and intangible assets
– The Company follows Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (FASB) Codification Topic 350-10 (“ASC 350-10”), “
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
”. According to this statement, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization, but rather an annual assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Fair value for goodwill is based on discounted cash flows, market multiples and/or appraised values as appropriate. Under ASC 350-10, the carrying value of assets are calculated at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows.
ASC 350-10 requires the Company to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount on an annual basis to determine if there is potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. During 2010, the Company completed an impairment review and did not recognize any impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets already included in the financial statements. The Company expects to receive future benefits from previously acquired goodwill over an indefinite period of time. Accordingly, beginning January 1, 2002, the Company has foregone all related amortization expense. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company amortized goodwill over an estimated useful life ranging from 3 to 15 years using the straight-line method.
Income taxes
– The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with FASB Codification Topic ASC 740-10, “
Income Taxes
”, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Stock-based compensation
– The Company follows the guidelines in FASB Codification Topic ASC 718-10 “
Compensation-Stock Compensation
”, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to a Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on the estimated fair values.
Stock based compensation expense recognized under ASC 718-10 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 totaled $85,800 and $43,668, respectively.
Earnings (loss) per share
– The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with FASB Codification Topic ASC 260-10 “
Earnings Per Share
”, Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented since the effect of the assumed exercise of options and warrants to purchase common shares (common stock equivalents) would have an anti-dilutive effect.
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES - (continued)
Reclassification
– The financial statements from 2008 reflect certain reclassifications, which will have no effect on net income, to conform to classifications in the current year.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
–
In January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-07 (ASU 2010-07), Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Not-for-Profit Entities: Mergers and Acquisitions. This amendment to Topic 958 has occurred as a result of the issuance of FAS 164. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-07 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-08 (ASU 2010-08), Technical Corrections to Various Topics. This amendment eliminated inconsistencies and outdated provisions and provided the needed clarifications to various topics within Topic 815. The amendments are effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance (February 2, 2010), except for certain amendments. The amendments to the guidance on accounting for income taxes in reorganization (Subtopic 852-740) should be applied to reorganizations for which the date of the reorganization is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. For those reorganizations reflected in interim financial statements issued before the amendments in this Update are effective, retrospective application is required. The clarifications of the guidance on the embedded derivates and hedging (Subtopic 815-15) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to existing contracts (hybrid instruments) containing embedded derivative features at the date of adoption. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-08 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09 (ASU 2010-09), Subsequent Events (Topic 855), amending guidance on subsequent events to alleviate potential conflicts between FASB guidance and SEC requirements. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements for the period ended May 31, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, "Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition" (codified within ASC 605 - Revenue Recognition). ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. ASU 2010-17 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-17 is not expected to have any material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-19 (ASU 2010-19), Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. The amendments in this Update are effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-19 to have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
2.
FIXED ASSETS
Fixed assets consist of the following as of March 31, 2011:
|
Machinery and equipment
|
$ | 55,463 | ||
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
113,635 | |||
|
Computers, equipment and software
|
38,105 | |||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
12,569 | |||
|
Lab equipment
|
115,946 | |||
|
Total
|
335,718 | |||
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
328,852 | |||
|
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$ | 6,866 |
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $484 and $1,300, respectively.
|
3.
INTANGIBLE AND OTHER ASSETS
|
Patents and trademarks are capitalized at its historical cost and are amortized over their useful lives. As of March 31, 2011, patents and trademarks total $231,363, net of $122,602 of accumulated amortization. Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $14,661 and $5,485, respectively.
License and distributor rights (“agreement”) was acquired by the Company in January 1999 and provides exclusive use distribution of polymers and polymer based products. The Company has a non-expiring term on the license and distribution rights. Accordingly, the Company annually assesses this license and distribution rights for impairment and has determined that no impairment write-down is considered necessary as of March 31, 2011.
|
4.
UNEARNED REVENUE
|
Unearned revenue totaling $475,315 as of March 31, 2011 relates to a marketing and distribution rights agreement entered into during 2010 for which monies were received and not considered earned. See note 9 “Definitive Agreements”.
5.
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
Stock options employees and directors
– During the years ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted stock options to employees and directors totaling 1,610,000 shares of its common stock with a weighted average strike price of $0.06. Certain stock options were exercisable upon grant and have a life ranging from 3 months to 5 years. The stock options were valued at $91,460 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years, risk free interest rates ranging from 1.25% to 2.19%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from 131% to 172%. The Company recorded an expense of $91,460 for the year ended December 31, 2010. There were no stock options issued to employees or directors during the three month period ended March 31, 2011.
Stock options non-employees
– During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted stock options for services totaling 450,000 shares of its common stock with a weighted average strike price of $0.06 per share. All stock options were exercisable upon grant. The stock options have been valued at $25,563 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years, risk free interest rates ranging from 1.25% to 3.5%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from 131% to 172%. There were no non-employee stock options issued during the three month period ended March 31, 2011.
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5.
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS – (continued)
The following is a summary of option activity during the year ended December 31, 2010 and the three month period ended March 31, 2011:
|
Number of Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
10,280,000 | 0.05 | ||||||
|
Options granted and assumed
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Options expired
|
300,000 | 0.04 | ||||||
|
Options canceled
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Options exercised
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Balance, March 31, 2011
|
9,980,000 | 0.05 | ||||||
As of March 31, 2011, 9,980,000 stock options are exercisable.
Stock warrants
-
The following is a summary of warrants activity during the year ended December 31, 2010 and the three month period ended March 31, 2011:
|
Number of Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
5,844,347 | 0.10 | ||||||
|
Warrants granted and assumed
|
1,344,750 | 0.06 | ||||||
|
Warrants expired
|
250,000 | 0.12 | ||||||
|
Warrants canceled
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Warrants exercised
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Balance, March 31, 2011
|
6,939,097 | 0.10 | ||||||
All warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2011 are exercisable. The warrants issued during 2011 were issued as part of a series of common stock subscriptions for cash.
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had an unsecured loan payable due to an employee with an interest rate of 10% per annum, due on demand totaling $241,070. As of December 31, 2010, all such notes have been extinguished or re-negotiated as convertible notes. See note 7.
7.
CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued an additional $23,000 of convertible debt to one individual. At the investor’s option until the repayment date, the note may be converted to shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $0.08 per share along with additional warrants to purchase one share for every two shares issued at the exercise price of $0.12 per share for two years after the conversion date. The Company has determined the value associated with the beneficial conversion feature in connection with the note to be $5,750. The beneficial conversion feature has been accreted and charged to interest expense in the amount of $2,273 as of December 31, 2010. On February 10, 2011, this note and all accrued interest was converted into common stock. The remaining beneficial conversion feature in the amount of $3,477 was amortized and expensed. The beneficial conversion feature was valued under the intrinsic value method.
On December 31, 2010, the Company re-negotiated accrued salaries and interest for three employees. Under the terms of the agreements, the salaries due were converted to promissory notes convertible into common stock with a warrant feature. The promissory notes are unsecured, due in one year from issuance, and bear an interest rate of 10%. At the investor’s option until the repayment date, the note may be converted to shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $0.04 per share along with additional warrants to purchase one share for every two shares issued at the exercise price of $0.06 per share for three years after the conversion date. The Company has determined the value associated with the beneficial conversion feature in connection with the notes to be $358,617. The beneficial conversion feature has been accreted and charged to interest expense in the amount of $89,654 as of March 31, 2011. The beneficial conversion feature is valued under the intrinsic value method.
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
7.
CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE – (Continued)
On December 31, 2010, the Company re-negotiated a related party note due to an employee of the Company. Under the terms of the agreement, the salaries due were converted to promissory notes convertible into common stock with a warrant feature. The promissory note are unsecured, due in one year from issuance, and bear an interest rate of 10%. At the investor’s option until the repayment date, the note may be converted to shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $0.03 per share along with additional warrants to purchase one share for every two shares issued at the exercise price of $0.05 per share for three years after the conversion date. The Company has determined the value associated with the beneficial conversion feature in connection with the notes to be $179,678. The beneficial conversion feature has been accreted and charged to interest expense in the amount of $44,919 as of March 31, 2011. The beneficial conversion feature is valued under the intrinsic value method.
8.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease obligations
– The Company has operating leases for its offices. Future minimum lease payments under the operating leases for the facilities as of March 31, 2011 are as follows:
2011
43,204
2012
57,606
Rental expense, resulting from operating lease agreements, approximated $14,402 for the three month period ended March 31, 2011.
Lawsuit
– The Company was a defendant in a lawsuit brought by a former member of the Board of Directors. The Company settled the lawsuit for 250,000 shares valued at $11,298 or an average price of $0.045/share.
9.
DEFINITIVE AGREEMENTS
In June 2010, the Company entered into two license agreements with RHEI Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd. The first agreement is for the exclusive manufacturing, marketing and distribution rights to three topical healthcare products for Europe, China and the US. Terms of the agreement are for a license fee of $750,000 split as to $250,000 for the rights for Europe and China which the Company has received and $500,000 for the US. The US rights are payable on product launch which must be no later than June 30, 2011. The second agreement is for the exclusive manufacturing, marketing and distribution rights to the Companies patent pending hand sanitizer using Chlorhexidine Gluconate as the active ingredient and trademarked DermSafe for Europe and China. Terms of this agreement are for a license fee of $750,000 with $500,000 for the rights for Europe and $250,000 for the rights for China. The license fees are payable on product launch in each country however no later than June 30, 2011. The license fee of $250,000 in the first agreement is to be recognized over a period of 5 years, leaving the unrecognized balance classified as unearned revenue. As of March 31, 2011, $50,000 has been recognized as revenue leaving a balance of $200,000 as unearned.
On October 12, 2010 the Company and Rhei amended the Definitive Agreements entered into on June 30, 2010. whereby Skinvisible granted Rhei, subject to conditions, rights for DermSafe® for Europe and China (“DermSafe Agreement”) and for Three Products for Europe, China and the USA (“Three Products Agreement”), (collectively the “License Agreements”). The amended agreement grants Rhei the exclusive right to distribute DermSafe within Europe for Commercial use only subject to Rhei paying the License Fee of five hundred thousand US dollars (US $500,000). Skinvisible agrees to apply the two hundred and fifty thousand US dollars (US $50,000) license fee paid by Rhei for the Three Products Agreement towards the DermSafe Agreement for Europe and Rhei paid a further fifty thousand US dollars (US $50,000) as of March 31, 2011. The Three Products Agreement will become non-exclusive effective immediately for the term of the Three Products Agreement. Should Rhei elect to pay the license fee prior to the expiration date of the Three Products Agreement, the license fee will be due immediately and the agreement will become exclusive for Rhei for that territory. While the Three Products Agreement remains non-exclusive, Skinvisible has the right to enter into an exclusive agreement with another party other than Rhei (“Third Party License”) for Europe, China or the USA. . The additional license fee of $250,000 as a result of the amended agreement is to be recognized over a period of 5 years along with the original $250,000, leaving the unrecognized balance classified as unearned revenue. As of March 31, 2011, $12,500 has been recognized as revenue leaving a balance of $235,000 as unearned.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.
Overview
We develop innovative polymer delivery vehicles and related compositions that hold active ingredients on the skin for extended periods of time when applied topically. We designed a process for combining water soluble and insoluble polymers that is specifically formulated to carry water insoluble and certain cationic active ingredients in water-based products without the use of alcohol, silicones, waxes, or other organic solvents. This enables active agents the ability to perform their intended functions for an extended period of time. Our polymer delivery vehicles, trademarked Invisicare®, allow normal skin respiration and perspiration. The polymer compositions we develop wear off as part of the natural exfoliation process of the skin's outer layer cells.
We believe Invisicare® offers the following benefits:
|
§
|
Displays superior skin adherence for extended time periods
|
|
§
|
Non-occlusive yet resists water wash-off, respiration and perspiration
|
|
§
|
Increased efficacy of active ingredients
|
|
§
|
Allows for lower use levels of actives with increased persistence of effect
|
|
§
|
Offers advantage of controlled and/or sustained time-release
|
|
§
|
Highly compatible with a variety of actives and bases
|
|
§
|
Easy to emulsify
|
|
§
|
Formulates well at a cream, lotion, or spray viscosity
|
|
§
|
Non-irritating emulsion dries quickly with no greasy after-feel
|
|
§
|
Non-occlusive film forms protective barrier against environmental irritants
|
|
§
|
Broad polymer selection to meet application requirements
|
|
§
|
Offers “Life Cycle” management to core products with potential for new patent
|
|
§
|
Simplified manufacturing process
|
Products that successfully incorporate Invisicare to date include acne, antimicrobial hand sanitizer lotions, suncare products, skincare moisturizers, sunless tanning products as well as various dermatology, women’s health, pain management and other pharmaceutical products for various disorders. On an ongoing basis, we are seeking to develop polymer formulations that can successfully be incorporated into other products.
Our primary objective is to license Invisicare to established brand manufacturers and marketers of prescription and over-the-counter products in the dermatological, medical, cosmetic, and other pharmaceutical markets. With the exception of sales to one vendor, our management’s policy is to only sell Invisicare to vendors that have executed a license agreement with us. We conduct our research and development in-house. We engage an outside party that currently handles all of our manufacturing and distribution needs.
Recent Developments
Canadian Patent
During the current reporting period, the Canadian Patent Office has issued a Notice of Allowance for the comprehensive technology patent for our Invisicare polymer delivery system. The Canadian patent for Invisicare (Patent number 758/10701.492) includes a total of forty-eight claims. This patent protects Invisicare in three key areas: 'Topical Composition', 'Topical Composition Precursor', and 'Methods for Manufacturing and Using'. Internationally, this is the seventh comprehensive patent granted to us for our Invisicare technology. This Canadian patent is equivalent to the Invisicare patents already granted in Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan and Korea. We also hold four United States patents which include one product patent and three patents relating to Invisicare.
Currently we have twenty-eight patents pending including twelve in the United States and sixteen international applications covering six patents.
FDA Application
Also during the current reporting period we submitted an application for an Orphan Drug Product Designation for our product formulated with Invisicare to treat Netherton Syndrome, a sub-type of ichthyosis disease. In conjunction with this application, we have also filed a patent application with the US Patent Office.
Netherton Syndrome is a sub-type of ichthyosis disease which is also referred to as NETH, Comel-Netherton syndrome, ichthyosis linearis circumflexa, or trichorrhexis invaginata. Netherton Syndrome is a genetic disease that is characterized by excessively scaly, circular red skin, brittle hair and for some also atopic dermatitis. The disease, which presents itself at birth or within the first year, is a life-long affliction that can have debilitating and even fatal consequences. There are currently no treatments available for Netherton Syndrome and limited options to treat the symptoms.
Patients with Netherton Syndrome have a mutated SPINK5 gene which is the gene responsible for inhibiting serine proteinase. The role of serine proteinase is to breakdown the intra-cellular bounds of the skin. Without the inhibitor, the breakdown of skin is no longer repressed, resulting in chronic scaly, red skin typical of Netherton syndrome. Our formulation is a serine proteinase inhibitor which is applied topically to the skin to prevent this constant breakdown of the skin.
The United States Orphan Drug Act was created to provide incentives to pharmaceutical companies to develop products for patients suffering from rare diseases. In the United States, a rare disease is defined as a condition which has less than 200,000 people with the disease. The incentives stipulated by the Act include eligibility for seven years of market exclusively for the product as well as a waiver of fees, tax incentives and a potential for grants to fund clinical trials. Some orphan drugs also receive an expedited review if the disease is severe or life-threatening.
Cancellation of Licensing Agreement
Due to non-compliance to the terms of the agreement, the licensing agreement with Sunless Beauty has been cancelled. Sunless Beauty will give up their rights to all sunless tanning products and suncare products that contain Invisicare.
European Approval for Hand Sanitizer
We also received news that our licensee, RHEI Pharmaceuticals NV, has received marketing authorization from the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products in Belgium for HandSafe(TM), a unique chlorhexidine hand sanitizer made without alcohol. HandSafe(TM), referred to as DermSafe(R) in the US and Canada, is a unique, patent pending hand sanitizer formulated with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate and Skinvisible's patented polymer delivery system Invisicare(R). HandSafe(TM) is made without alcohol so it will not dry the skin. It is proven to kill both bacteria and viruses for up to four hours including the viruses H1N1, H5N1 and H3N2.
Skinvisible licensed the commercial rights to its unique hand sanitizer to RHEI in October 2010 for Europe. This approval in Belgium is the catalyst to receiving authorization in most major countries in the European Union in an expedited manner. RHEI will now submit marketing applications for HandSafe(TM) under Europe's mutual recognition procedure which utilizes the marketing authorization already granted in Belgium.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
Revenues
Our total revenue reported for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $80,355, a decrease from $158,230 for the same period ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from the prior period is attributable to decreased sales of polymers to our licensees.
Cost of Revenues
Our cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased to $438 from the same period ended March 31, 2010, when cost of revenues was $4,196. The decrease in our cost of revenues for three months ended March 31, 2011 from the prior period is attributable to fewer costs associated with product materials.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $79,917, or approximately 99% of sales. Gross profit for three months ended March 31, 2010 was $154,034, or approximately 97% of sales.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased to $324,003 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $215,410 for the same period ended March 31, 2010. Our operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 consisted of depreciation and amortization expenses of $15,144 and selling, general and administrative expenses of $308,859. Our operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 consisted of depreciation and amortization expenses of $6,785, and selling, general and administrative expenses of $208,625
.
Operating expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were significantly higher as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to $138,050 in amortization of debt discounts calculated on convertible notes payable.
Other Expenses
We paid less in interest expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 than in the prior period ended 2010, resulting in total other expenses of $22,950 as compared with $70,343 for the prior period.
Net Loss
We recorded a net loss of $267,036 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared with a net loss of $131,719 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2011, we had total current assets of $294,166 and total assets in the amount of $532,395. Our total current liabilities as of March 31, 2011 were $1,626,591. We had a working capital deficit of $1,332,425 as of March 31, 2011.
Operating activities used $74,747 in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Our net loss of $267,036 and an increase in accounts receivable of $250,000 were the main components of our negative operating cash flow, offset mainly by amortization of debt discount of $139,503, a decrease in unearned revenue of $172,500, and stock based compensation of $85,800.
Cash flows used by investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $14,583 as a result of the purchase of fixed and intangible assets.
Cash flows provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $88,200 and consisted primarily of $63,000 in proceeds from the issuance of stock and $25,200 in proceeds from loans.
Based upon our current financial condition, we do not have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months. We intend to fund operations through increased sales and debt and/or equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity offering to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.
Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred cumulative net losses of approximately $20,025,494 since our inception and require capital for our contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. Our ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of the common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of our contemplated plan of operations, and our transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for us to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2011, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Going concern
– The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of $19,758,458 since its inception and requires capital for its contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.
Product sales
– Revenues from the sale of products are recognized when title to the products are transferred to the customer and only when no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive reasonably assured payments for products sold and delivered.
Royalty sales
– The Company also recognizes royalty revenue from licensing its patent and trademarks, only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.
Distribution and license rights sales
– The Company also recognizes revenue from distribution and license rights only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.
Costs of Revenue
– Cost of revenue includes raw materials, component parts, and shipping supplies. Shipping and handling costs is not a significant portion of the cost of revenue.
Accounts Receivable
– Accounts receivable is comprised of uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reviewed periodically for collectability. If management determines that collection is unlikely, an allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected is recorded. Management reviews each accounts receivable balance that exceeds 30 days from the invoice date and, based on an assessment of creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-07 (ASU 2010-07), Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Not-for-Profit Entities: Mergers and Acquisitions. This amendment to Topic 958 has occurred as a result of the issuance of FAS 164. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-07 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-08 (ASU 2010-08), Technical Corrections to Various Topics. This amendment eliminated inconsistencies and outdated provisions and provided the needed clarifications to various topics within Topic 815. The amendments are effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance (February 2, 2010), except for certain amendments. The amendments to the guidance on accounting for income taxes in reorganization (Subtopic 852-740) should be applied to reorganizations for which the date of the reorganization is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. For those reorganizations reflected in interim financial statements issued before the amendments in this Update are effective, retrospective application is required. The clarifications of the guidance on the embedded derivates and hedging (Subtopic 815-15) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to existing contracts (hybrid instruments) containing embedded derivative features at the date of adoption. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-08 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09 (ASU 2010-09), Subsequent Events (Topic 855), amending guidance on subsequent events to alleviate potential conflicts between FASB guidance and SEC requirements. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements for the period ended May 31, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition” (codified within ASC 605 – Revenue Recognition). ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. ASU 2010-17 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-17 is not expected to have any material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-19 (ASU 2010-19), Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. The amendments in this Update are effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-19 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.
We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2011. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Terry Howlett. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls
Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving our objectives and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.
A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued 1,466,000 restricted shares of our common stock for services rendered.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 we issued 1,402,000 restricted shares of our common stock as a result of entering into loan conversion agreements with lenders to convert total principal balances and interest of $56,056 into equity. In connection with the conversions, warrants were also granted to purchase 701,000 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $0.06 per share that expire on January 9, 2013, and warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $0.08 per share that expire on February 28, 2013.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued 1,287,500 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $63,000. In connection with the issuances, warrants were also granted to purchase 543,750 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $0.06 per share that expire on January 9, 2013.
These securities were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The holders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The investors were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.
None
None
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
of Exhibit
|
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
Skinvisible, Inc.
|
|
|
Date:
|
May 16, 2011
|
|
By:
/s/ Terry Howlett
Terry Howlett
Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I - Financial InformationItem 1. Financial StatementsItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 4T. Controls and ProceduresPart II Other InformationItem 1. Legal ProceedingsItem 1A: Risk FactorsItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsItem 3. Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesItem 4. Removed and ReservedItem 5. Other InformationItem 6. Exhibits