SLM 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2013

SLM CORP

10-Ks and 10-Qs

10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2025
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2025
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2024
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2024
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2023
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2023
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2022
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended March 31, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on June 17, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on April 28, 2025
DEF 14A	Filed on June 18, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 26, 2024
DEF 14A	Filed on April 27, 2023
DEF 14A	Filed on June 21, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on April 28, 2022
DEF 14A	Filed on April 22, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on April 28, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on April 26, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on April 27, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on April 27, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on April 28, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on April 29, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on April 30, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on April 19, 2013
DEF 14A	Filed on April 13, 2012
DEF 14A	Filed on April 8, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on March 30, 2010

10-Q 1 d539937d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-13251

SLM Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		52-2013874
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware		19713
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(302) 283-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer	x		Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:


Class		Outstanding at June 30, 2013
Common Stock, $0.20 par value		436,188,852 shares

SLM CORPORATION

Table of Contents


Part I. Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	87
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	92
PART II. Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	93
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	93
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	94
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	95
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	95
Item 5.	Other Information	95
Item 6.	Exhibits	95

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

SLM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Assets
FFELP Loans (net of allowance for losses of $133 and $159, respectively)	$	108,491		$	125,612
Private Education Loans (net of allowance for losses of $2,149 and $2,171 respectively)		37,116			36,934
Investments
Available-for-sale		72			72
Other		866			1,010

Total investments		938			1,082
Cash and cash equivalents		3,327			3,900
Restricted cash and investments		4,109			5,011
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets, net		440			448
Other assets		7,047			8,273

Total assets	$	161,468		$	181,260

Liabilities
Short-term borrowings	$	16,558		$	19,856
Long-term borrowings		135,879			152,401
Other liabilities		3,597			3,937

Total liabilities		156,034			176,194

Commitments and contingencies
Equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.20 per share, 20 million shares authorized
Series A: 3.3 million and 3.3 million shares issued, respectively, at stated value of $50 per share		165			165
Series B: 4 million and 4 million shares issued, respectively, at stated value of $100 per share		400			400
Common stock, par value $0.20 per share, 1.125 billion shares authorized: 544 million and 536 million shares issued, respectively		109			107
Additional paid-in capital		4,355			4,237
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax (expense) benefit of $(5) and $3, respectively)		9			(6	)
Retained earnings		2,195			1,451

Total SLM Corporation stockholders’ equity before treasury stock		7,233			6,354
Less: Common stock held in treasury at cost: 108 million and 83 million shares, respectively		(1,804	)		(1,294	)

Total SLM Corporation stockholders’ equity		5,429			5,060
Noncontrolling interest		5			6

Total equity		5,434			5,066

Total liabilities and equity	$	161,468		$	181,260

Supplemental information — assets and liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities:


	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
FFELP Loans	$	103,662	$	121,059
Private Education Loans		26,084		26,072
Restricted cash and investments		3,698		4,826
Other assets		1,841		2,312
Short-term borrowings		6,524		9,551
Long-term borrowings		116,504		131,518

Net assets of consolidated variable interest entities	$	12,257	$	13,200

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SLM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Interest income:
FFELP Loans	$	703		$	777		$	1,439		$	1,619
Private Education Loans		627			616			1,249			1,241
Other loans		3			4			6			9
Cash and investments		4			6			8			8

Total interest income		1,337			1,403			2,702			2,877
Total interest expense		553			656			1,123			1,322

Net interest income		784			747			1,579			1,555
Less: provisions for loan losses		201			243			442			496

Net interest income after provisions for loan losses		583			504			1,137			1,059

Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		251			—			307			—
Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net		18			6			(13	)		(366	)
Servicing revenue		89			88			178			178
Contingency revenue		109			87			208			176
Gains on debt repurchases		19			20			42			58
Other		24			(2	)		58			38

Total other income		510			199			780			84

Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		134			117			265			242
Other operating expenses		124			114			243			240

Total operating expenses		258			231			508			482
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization expense		4			5			7			9
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		24			3			35			7

Total expenses		286			239			550			498

Income from continuing operations, before income tax expense		807			464			1,367			645
Income tax expense		300			169			512			237

Net income from continuing operations		507			295			855			408
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax expense (benefit)		35			(4	)		33			(6	)

Net income		542			291			888			402
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)

Net income attributable to SLM Corporation		543			292			889			403
Preferred stock dividends		5			5			10			10

Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock	$	538		$	287		$	879		$	393

Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to SLM Corporation:
Continuing operations	$	1.14		$	.60		$	1.90		$	.81
Discontinued operations		.08			(.01	)		.07			(.01	)

Total	$	1.22		$	.59		$	1.97		$	.80

Average common shares outstanding		440			482			445			493

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to SLM Corporation:
Continuing operations	$	1.12		$	.60		$	1.87		$	.80
Discontinued operations		.08			(.01	)		.07			(.01	)

Total	$	1.20		$	.59		$	1.94		$	.79

Average common and common equivalent shares outstanding		448			488			453			499

Dividends per common share attributable to SLM Corporation	$	.15		$	.125		$	.30		$	.25

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SLM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income	$	542		$	291		$	888		$	402
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives:
Unrealized hedging gains (losses) on derivatives		22			(10	)		23			(11	)
Reclassification adjustments for derivative losses included in net income (interest expense)		2			8			5			17

Total unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives		24			(2	)		28			6
Unrealized losses on investments		(3	)		—			(4	)		—
Income tax (expense) benefit		(8	)		1			(9	)		(2	)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		13			(1	)		15			4

Comprehensive income		555			290			903			406
Less: comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)

Total comprehensive income attributable to SLM Corporation	$	556		$	291		$	904		$	407

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SLM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Preferred Stock Shares		Common Stock Shares								Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest			Total Equity
	Preferred Stock Shares		Issued		Treasury			Outstanding			Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest			Total Equity
Balance at March 31, 2012		7,300,000		532,246,806		(39,084,156	)		493,162,650		$	565	$	106	$	4,182	$	(9	)	$	814		$	(620	)	$	5,038		$	8		$	5,046
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			292			—			292			(1	)		291
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		(1	)		—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—			291			(1	)		290
Cash dividends:
Common stock ($.125 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			(61	)		—			(61	)		—			(61	)
Preferred stock, series A ($.87 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			(3	)		—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Preferred stock, series B ($.56 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			(2	)		—			(2	)		—			(2	)
Issuance of common shares		—		426,168		—			426,168			—		1		4		—			—			—			5			—			5
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		10		—			—			—			10			—			10
Common stock repurchased		—		—		(23,836,964	)		(23,836,964	)		—		—		—		—			—			(341	)		(341	)		—			(341	)
Shares repurchased related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		(349,655	)		(349,655	)		—		—		—		—			—			(6	)		(6	)		—			(6	)

Balance at June 30, 2012		7,300,000		532,672,974		(63,270,775	)		469,402,199		$	565	$	107	$	4,196	$	(10	)	$	1,040		$	(967	)	$	4,931		$	7		$	4,938

Balance at March 31, 2013		7,300,000		539,665,760		(95,455,400	)		444,210,360		$	565	$	108	$	4,291	$	(4	)	$	1,723		$	(1,535	)	$	5,148		$	6		$	5,154
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			543			—			543			(1	)		542
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		13			—			—			13			—			13

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—			556			(1	)		555
Cash dividends:
Common stock ($.15 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			(66	)		—			(66	)		—			(66	)
Preferred stock, series A ($.87 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			(3	)		—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Preferred stock, series B ($.52 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			(2	)		—			(2	)		—			(2	)
Issuance of common shares		—		4,115,424		—			4,115,424			—		1		50		—			—			—			51			—			51
Tax benefit related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		—			—			—		—		4		—			—			—			4			—			4
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		10		—			—			—			10			—			10
Common stock repurchased		—		—		(9,096,144	)		(9,096,144	)		—		—		—		—			—			(201	)		(201	)		—			(201	)
Shares repurchased related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		(3,040,788	)		(3,040,788	)		—		—		—		—			—			(68	)		(68	)		—			(68	)

Balance at June 30, 2013		7,300,000		543,781,184		(107,592,332	)		436,188,852		$	565	$	109	$	4,355	$	9		$	2,195		$	(1,804	)	$	5,429		$	5		$	5,434

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SLM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Preferred Stock Shares		Common Stock Shares								Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest			Total Equity
	Preferred Stock Shares		Issued		Treasury			Outstanding			Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest			Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2011		7,300,000		529,075,322		(20,323,997	)		508,751,325		$	565	$	106	$	4,136		$	(14	)	$	770		$	(320	)	$	5,243		$	8		$	5,251
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			403			—			403			(1	)		402
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			4			—			—			4			—			4

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			—			407			(1	)		406
Cash dividends:
Common stock ($.25 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			(123	)		—			(123	)		—			(123	)
Preferred stock, series A ($1.74 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			(6	)		—			(6	)		—			(6	)
Preferred stock, series B ($1.13 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			(4	)		—			(4	)		—			(4	)
Issuance of common shares		—		3,597,652		—			3,597,652			—		1		31			—			—			—			32			—			32
Tax benefit related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		—			—			—		—		(3	)		—			—			—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		32			—			—			—			32			—			32
Common stock repurchased		—		—		(40,540,146	)		(40,540,146	)		—		—		—			—			—			(609	)		(609	)		—			(609	)
Shares repurchased related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		(2,406,632	)		(2,406,632	)		—		—		—			—			—			(38	)		(38	)		—			(38	)

Balance at June 30, 2012		7,300,000		532,672,974		(63,270,775	)		469,402,199		$	565	$	107	$	4,196		$	(10	)	$	1,040		$	(967	)	$	4,931		$	7		$	4,938

Balance at December 31, 2012		7,300,000		535,507,965		(82,910,021	)		452,597,944		$	565	$	107	$	4,237		$	(6	)	$	1,451		$	(1,294	)	$	5,060		$	6		$	5,066
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			889			—			889			(1	)		888
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			15			—			—			15			—			15

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			—			904			(1	)		903
Cash dividends:
Common stock ($.30 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			(134	)		—			(134	)		—			(134	)
Preferred stock, series A ($1.74 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			(6	)		—			(6	)		—			(6	)
Preferred stock, series B ($1.01 per share)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			(4	)		—			(4	)		—			(4	)
Dividend equivalent units related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Issuance of common shares		—		8,273,219		—			8,273,219			—		2		84			—			—			—			86			—			86
Tax benefit related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		—			—			—		—		5			—			—			—			5			—			5
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		29			—			—			—			29			—			29
Common stock repurchased		—		—		(19,316,948	)		(19,316,948	)		—		—		—			—			—			(400	)		(400	)		—			(400	)
Shares repurchased related to employee stock-based compensation plans		—		—		(5,365,363	)		(5,365,363	)		—		—		—			—			—			(110	)		(110	)		—			(110	)

Balance at June 30, 2013		7,300,000		543,781,184		(107,592,332	)		436,188,852		$	565	$	109	$	4,355		$	9		$	2,195		$	(1,804	)	$	5,429		$	5		$	5,434

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SLM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in millions)

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Operating activities
Net income	$	888		$	402
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(33	)		6
Gains on sales of loans and investments		(307	)		—
Gains on debt repurchases		(42	)		(58	)
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization expense		7			9
Stock-based compensation expense		29			32
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivative and hedging activities		(330	)		(1	)
Provisions for loan losses		442			496
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash — other		(6	)		1
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable		(42	)		104
Increase in accrued interest payable		6			29
Decrease in other assets		504			32
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(200	)		92

Cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations		916			1,144

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities – discontinued operations		38			(6	)

Total net cash provided by operating activities		954			1,138

Investing activities
Student loans acquired and originated		(2,078	)		(3,826	)
Reduction of student loans:
Installment payments, claims and other		6,265			8,479
Proceeds from sales of student loans		707			284
Other investing activities, net		115			—
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(24	)		(22	)
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities		20			44
Purchases of other securities		(144	)		(148	)
Proceeds from maturities of other securities		133			128
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash – variable interest entities		611			(994	)

Total net cash provided by investing activities		5,605			3,945

Financing activities
Borrowings collateralized by loans in trust — issued		6,187			6,894
Borrowings collateralized by loans in trust — repaid		(6,439	)		(6,849	)
Asset-backed commercial paper conduits, net		4,349			1,233
ED Conduit Program facility, net		(9,551	)		(5,835	)
Other short-term borrowings issued		—			23
Other short-term borrowings repaid		(893	)		(64	)
Other long-term borrowings issued		1,489			1,927
Other long-term borrowings repaid		(1,403	)		(1,782	)
Other financing activities, net		(766	)		94
Retail and other deposits, net		439			244
Common stock repurchased		(400	)		(609	)
Common stock dividends paid		(134	)		(123	)
Preferred stock dividends paid		(10	)		(10	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(7,132	)		(4,857	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(573	)		226
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,900			2,794

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,327		$	3,020

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash disbursements made (refunds received) for:
Interest	$	1,121		$	1,276

Income taxes paid	$	282		$	310

Income taxes received	$	(18	)	$	(5	)

Noncash activity:
Investing activity — Student loans and other assets acquired	$	—		$	402

Student loans and other assets removed related to sale of Residual Interest in securitization	$	(11,802	)	$	—

Financing activity — Borrowings assumed in acquisition of student loans and other assets	$	—		$	425

Borrowings removed related to sale of Residual Interest in securitization	$	(12,084	)	$	—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Information at June 30, 2013 and for the three and six months ended

June 30, 2013 and 2012 is unaudited)

1.	Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited, consolidated financial statements of SLM Corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SLM Corporation and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries and those Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) for which we are the primary beneficiary, after eliminating the effects of intercompany accounts and transactions. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2013 or for any other period. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “2012 Form 10-K”). Definitions for certain capitalized terms used in this document can be found in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Consolidation

In first six months of 2013, we sold Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts to third parties. We will continue to service the student loans in the trusts under existing agreements. Prior to the sale of the Residual Interests, we had consolidated the trusts as VIEs because we had met the two criteria for consolidation. We had determined we were the primary beneficiary because (1) as servicer to the trust we had the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly affected its economic performance and (2) as the residual holder of the trust, we had an obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits of the trust that could potentially be significant. Upon the sale of the Residual Interests we are no longer the residual holder, thus we determined we no longer met criterion (2) above and deconsolidated the trusts. As a result of these transactions, we removed securitization trust assets of $12.5 billion and the related liabilities of $12.1 billion from the balance sheet and recorded a $312 million gain as part of “gains on sales of loans and investments” for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the balances as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 to be consistent with classifications adopted for 2013, and had no effect on net income, total assets, or total liabilities.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

On January 1, 2013, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), “Reporting Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this new guidance is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The impact of adopting this new guidance was immaterial and there was no impact on our results of operations.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses

Our provisions for loan losses represent the periodic expense of maintaining an allowance sufficient to absorb incurred probable losses, net of expected recoveries, in the held-for-investment loan portfolios. The evaluation of the provisions for loan losses is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant changes. We believe that the allowance for loan losses is appropriate to cover probable losses incurred in the loan portfolios. We segregate our Private Education Loan portfolio into two classes of loans — traditional and non-traditional. Non-traditional loans are loans to (i) customers attending for-profit schools with an original Fair Isaac and Company (“FICO”) score of less than 670 and (ii) customers attending not-for-profit schools with an original FICO score of less than 640. The FICO score used in determining whether a loan is non-traditional is the greater of the customer or cosigner FICO score at origination. Traditional loans are defined as all other Private Education Loans that are not classified as non-traditional.

Allowance for Loan Losses Metrics


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Other Loans			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses
Beginning balance	$	147		$	2,170		$	42		$	2,359
Total provision		14			187			—			201
Charge-offs ⁽¹⁾		(20	)		(212	)		(7	)		(239	)
Student loan sales		(8	)		—			—			(8	)
Reclassification of interest reserve ⁽²⁾		—			4			—			4

Ending balance	$	133		$	2,149		$	35		$	2,317

Allowance:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	1,181		$	26		$	1,207
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	133		$	968		$	9		$	1,110
Loans:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	8,416		$	57		$	8,473
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	107,538		$	31,601		$	96		$	139,235
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment (annualized)		.10	%		2.69	%		17.57	%
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment and forbearance (annualized)		.08	%		2.59	%		17.57	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance		.12	%		5.37	%		22.93	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment		.17	%		6.80	%		22.93	%
Allowance coverage of charge-offs (annualized)		1.7			2.5			1.2
Ending total loans ⁽³⁾	$	107,538		$	40,017		$	153
Average loans in repayment	$	81,423		$	31,618		$	161
Ending loans in repayment	$	77,063		$	31,627		$	153

⁽¹⁾

Charge-offs are reported net of expected recoveries. For Private Education Loans, the expected recovery amount is transferred to the receivable for partially charged-off loan balance. Charge-offs include charge-offs against the receivable for partially charged-off loans which represents the difference between what was expected to be collected and any shortfalls in what was actually collected in the period. See “Receivable for Partially Charged-Off Private Education Loans” for further discussion.

⁽²⁾

Represents the additional allowance related to the amount of uncollectible interest reserved within interest income that is transferred in the period to the allowance for loan losses when interest is capitalized to a loan’s principal balance.

⁽³⁾

Ending total loans for Private Education Loans includes the receivable for partially charged-off loans.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Other Loans			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses
Beginning balance	$	180		$	2,190		$	64		$	2,434
Total provision		18			225			—			243
Charge-offs ⁽¹⁾		(23	)		(235	)		(5	)		(263	)
Student loan sales		(2	)		—			—			(2	)
Reclassification of interest reserve ⁽²⁾		—			6			—			6

Ending balance	$	173		$	2,186		$	59		$	2,418

Allowance:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	921		$	45		$	966
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	173		$	1,265		$	14		$	1,452
Loans:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	6,569		$	84		$	6,653
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	131,512		$	32,905		$	152		$	164,569
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment (annualized)		.10	%		3.09	%		9.80	%
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment and forbearance (annualized)		.08	%		2.96	%		9.80	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance		.13	%		5.54	%		24.85	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment		.19	%		7.11	%		24.85	%
Allowance coverage of charge-offs (annualized)		1.8			2.3			2.5
Ending total loans ⁽³⁾	$	131,512		$	39,474		$	236
Average loans in repayment	$	92,436		$	30,533		$	241
Ending loans in repayment	$	91,998		$	30,731		$	236

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

Ending total loans for Private Education Loans includes the receivable for partially charged-off loans.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Other Loans			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses
Beginning balance	$	159		$	2,171		$	47		$	2,377
Total provision		30			412			—			442
Charge-offs ⁽¹⁾		(42	)		(444	)		(12	)		(498	)
Student loan sales		(14	)		—			—			(14	)
Reclassification of interest reserve ⁽²⁾		—			10			—			10

Ending balance	$	133		$	2,149		$	35		$	2,317

Allowance:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	1,181		$	26		$	1,207
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	133		$	968		$	9		$	1,110
Loans:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	8,416		$	57		$	8,473
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	107,538		$	31,601		$	96		$	139,235
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment (annualized)		.10	%		2.83	%		14.11	%
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment and forbearance (annualized)		.09	%		2.73	%		14.11	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance		.12	%		5.37	%		22.93	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment		.17	%		6.80	%		22.93	%
Allowance coverage of charge-offs (annualized)		1.6			2.4			1.5
Ending total loans ⁽³⁾	$	107,538		$	40,017		$	153
Average loans in repayment	$	84,323		$	31,631		$	170
Ending loans in repayment	$	77,063		$	31,627		$	153

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

Ending total loans for Private Education Loans includes the receivable for partially charged-off loans.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Other Loans			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses
Beginning balance	$	187		$	2,171		$	69		$	2,427
Total provision		36			460			—			496
Charge-offs ⁽¹⁾		(46	)		(459	)		(10	)		(515	)
Student loan sales		(4	)		—			—			(4	)
Reclassification of interest reserve ⁽²⁾		—			14			—			14

Ending balance	$	173		$	2,186		$	59		$	2,418

Allowance:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	921		$	45		$	966
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	173		$	1,265		$	14		$	1,452
Loans:
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	6,569		$	84		$	6,653
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	131,512		$	32,905		$	152		$	164,569
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment (annualized)		.10	%		3.03	%		8.41	%
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment and forbearance (annualized)		.08	%		2.90	%		8.41	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance		.13	%		5.54	%		24.85	%
Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment		.19	%		7.11	%		24.85	%
Allowance coverage of charge-offs (annualized)		1.9			2.4			2.8
Ending total loans ⁽³⁾	$	131,512		$	39,474		$	236
Average loans in repayment	$	92,793		$	30,456		$	248
Ending loans in repayment	$	91,998		$	30,731		$	236

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

Ending total loans for Private Education Loans includes the receivable for partially charged-off loans.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

Key Credit Quality Indicators

FFELP Loans are substantially insured and guaranteed as to their principal and accrued interest in the event of default; therefore, the key credit quality indicator for this portfolio is loan status. The impact of changes in loan status is incorporated quarterly into the allowance for loan losses calculation.

For Private Education Loans, the key credit quality indicators are school type, FICO scores, the existence of a cosigner, the loan status and loan seasoning. The school type/FICO score are assessed at origination and maintained through the traditional/non-traditional loan designation. The other Private Education Loan key quality indicators can change and are incorporated quarterly into the allowance for loan losses calculation. The following table highlights the principal balance (excluding the receivable for partially charged-off loans) of our Private Education Loan portfolio stratified by the key credit quality indicators.


	Private Education Loans Credit Quality Indicators
	June 30, 2013					December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance ⁽³⁾		% of Balance			Balance ⁽³⁾		% of Balance
Credit Quality Indicators
School Type/FICO Scores:
Traditional	$	35,645		92	%	$	35,347		92	%
Non-Traditional ⁽¹⁾		3,038		8			3,207		8

Total	$	38,683		100	%	$	38,554		100	%

Cosigners:
With cosigner	$	25,448		66	%	$	24,907		65	%
Without cosigner		13,235		34			13,647		35

Total	$	38,683		100	%	$	38,554		100	%

Seasoning ⁽²⁾ :
1-12 payments	$	7,132		19	%	$	7,371		19	%
13-24 payments		5,681		15			6,137		16
25-36 payments		5,878		15			6,037		16
37-48 payments		4,822		12			4,780		12
More than 48 payments		9,274		24			8,325		22
Not yet in repayment		5,896		15			5,904		15

Total	$	38,683		100	%	$	38,554		100	%

⁽¹⁾

Defined as loans to customers attending for-profit schools (with a FICO score of less than 670 at origination) and customers attending not-for-profit schools (with a FICO score of less than 640 at origination).

⁽²⁾

Number of months in active repayment for which a scheduled payment was due.

⁽³⁾

Balance represents gross Private Education Loans.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following tables provide information regarding the loan status and aging of past due loans.


	FFELP Loan Delinquencies
	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance			%			Balance			%
Loans in-school/grace/deferment ⁽¹⁾	$	15,239					$	17,702
Loans in forbearance ⁽²⁾		15,236						15,902
Loans in repayment and percentage of each status:
Loans current		64,801			84.1	%		75,499			83.2	%
Loans delinquent 31-60 days ⁽³⁾		3,750			4.9			4,710			5.2
Loans delinquent 61-90 days ⁽³⁾		2,156			2.8			2,788			3.1
Loans delinquent greater than 90 days ⁽³⁾		6,356			8.2			7,734			8.5

Total FFELP Loans in repayment		77,063			100	%		90,731			100	%

Total FFELP Loans, gross		107,538						124,335
FFELP Loan unamortized premium		1,086						1,436

Total FFELP Loans		108,624						125,771
FFELP Loan allowance for losses		(133	)					(159	)

FFELP Loans, net	$	108,491					$	125,612

Percentage of FFELP Loans in repayment					71.7	%					73.0	%

Delinquencies as a percentage of FFELP Loans in repayment					15.9	%					16.8	%

FFELP Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance					16.5	%					14.9	%

⁽¹⁾

Loans for customers who may still be attending school or engaging in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on their loans, e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation, as well as loans for customers who have requested and qualify for other permitted program deferments such as military, unemployment, or economic hardships.

⁽²⁾

Loans for customers who have used their allowable deferment time or do not qualify for deferment, that need additional time to obtain employment or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors.

⁽³⁾

The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


	Private Education Traditional Loan Delinquencies
	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance			%			Balance			%
Loans in-school/grace/deferment ⁽¹⁾	$	5,475					$	5,421
Loans in forbearance ⁽²⁾		1,015						996
Loans in repayment and percentage of each status:
Loans current		27,218			93.3	%		26,597			91.9	%
Loans delinquent 31-60 days ⁽³⁾		650			2.2			837			2.9
Loans delinquent 61-90 days ⁽³⁾		395			1.4			375			1.3
Loans delinquent greater than 90 days ⁽³⁾		892			3.1			1,121			3.9

Total traditional loans in repayment		29,155			100	%		28,930			100	%

Total traditional loans, gross		35,645						35,347
Traditional loans unamortized discount		(673	)					(713	)

Total traditional loans		34,972						34,634
Traditional loans receivable for partially charged-off loans		800						797
Traditional loans allowance for losses		(1,629	)					(1,637	)

Traditional loans, net	$	34,143					$	33,794

Percentage of traditional loans in repayment					81.8	%					81.9	%

Delinquencies as a percentage of traditional loans in repayment					6.6	%					8.1	%

Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance					3.4	%					3.3	%

⁽¹⁾

Deferment includes customers who have returned to school or are engaged in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on their loans, e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation.

⁽²⁾

Loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period generally during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors, consistent with established loan program servicing policies and procedures.

⁽³⁾

The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


	Private Education Non-Traditional Loan Delinquencies
	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance			%			Balance			%
Loans in-school/grace/deferment ⁽¹⁾	$	421					$	483
Loans in forbearance ⁽²⁾		145						140
Loans in repayment and percentage of each status:
Loans current		1,978			80.1	%		1,978			76.5	%
Loans delinquent 31-60 days ⁽³⁾		142			5.7			175			6.8
Loans delinquent 61-90 days ⁽³⁾		100			4.0			106			4.1
Loans delinquent greater than 90 days ⁽³⁾		252			10.2			325			12.6

Total non-traditional loans in repayment		2,472			100	%		2,584			100	%

Total non-traditional loans, gross		3,038						3,207
Non-traditional loans unamortized discount		(79	)					(83	)

Total non-traditional loans		2,959						3,124
Non-traditional loans receivable for partially charged-off loans		534						550
Non-traditional loans allowance for losses		(520	)					(534	)

Non-traditional loans, net	$	2,973					$	3,140

Percentage of non-traditional loans in repayment					81.4	%					80.6	%

Delinquencies as a percentage of non-traditional loans in repayment					20.0	%					23.4	%

Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance					5.5	%					5.1	%

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

Receivable for Partially Charged-Off Private Education Loans

At the end of each month, for loans that are 212 days past due, we charge off the estimated loss of a defaulted loan balance. Actual recoveries are applied against the remaining loan balance that was not charged off. We refer to this remaining loan balance as the “receivable for partially charged-off loans.” If actual periodic recoveries are less than expected, the difference is immediately charged off through the allowance for loan losses with an offsetting reduction in the receivable for partially charged-off Private Education Loans. If actual periodic recoveries are greater than expected, they will be reflected as a recovery through the allowance for Private Education Loan losses once the cumulative recovery amount exceeds the cumulative amount originally expected to be recovered. Private Education Loans which defaulted between 2008 and 2012 for which we have previously charged off estimated losses have, to varying degrees, not met our post-default recovery expectations to date and may continue not to do so. According to our policy, we have been charging off these periodic shortfalls in expected recoveries against our allowance for Private Education Loan losses and the related receivable for partially charged-off Private Education Loans and we will continue to do so. There was $217 million and $141 million in allowance for Private Education Loan losses at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, providing for possible additional future charge-offs related to the receivable for partially charged-off Private Education Loans.

The following table summarizes the activity in the receivable for partially charged-off Private Education Loans.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Receivable at beginning of period	$	1,339		$	1,250		$	1,347		$	1,241
Expected future recoveries of current period defaults ⁽¹⁾		70			82			148			151
Recoveries ⁽²⁾		(54	)		(44	)		(122	)		(94	)
Charge-offs ⁽³⁾		(21	)		(11	)		(39	)		(21	)

Receivable at end of period		1,334			1,277			1,334			1,277
Allowance for estimated recovery shortfalls ⁽⁴⁾		(217	)		(141	)		(217	)		(141	)

Net receivable at end of period	$	1,117		$	1,136		$	1,117		$	1,136

⁽¹⁾

Represents the difference between the loan balance and our estimate of the amount to be collected in the future.

⁽²⁾

Current period cash collections.

⁽³⁾

Represents the current period recovery shortfall — the difference between what was expected to be collected and what was actually collected. These amounts are included in the Private Education Loan total charge-offs as reported in the “Allowance for Loan Losses Metrics” tables.

⁽⁴⁾

The allowance for estimated recovery shortfalls of the receivable for partially charged-off Private Education Loans is a component of the $2.1 billion and $2.2 billion overall allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”)

We modify the terms of loans for certain customers when we believe such modifications may increase the ability and willingness of a customer to make payments and thus increase the ultimate overall amount collected on a loan. These modifications generally take the form of a forbearance, a temporary interest rate reduction or an extended repayment plan. For customers experiencing financial difficulty, certain Private Education Loans for which we have granted either cumulative forbearance of greater than three months, an interest rate reduction or

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

an extended repayment plan are classified as TDRs. Forbearance provides customers the ability to defer payments for a period of time, but does not result in the forgiveness of any principal or interest. While in forbearance status, interest continues to accrue and is capitalized to principal when the loan re-enters repayment status. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the percentage of loans granted forbearance that have migrated to a TDR classification due to the extension of the original forbearance period was 48 percent and 43 percent, respectively. The unpaid principal balance of TDR loans that were in an interest rate reduction plan as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $1.5 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all of our TDR loans had a related allowance recorded. The following table provides the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance and related allowance for our TDR loans.


	TDR Loans
(Dollars in millions)	Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
June 30, 2013
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	6,728	$	6,807	$	901
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		1,366		1,376		280

Total	$	8,094	$	8,183	$	1,181

December 31, 2012
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	5,999	$	6,074	$	844
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		1,295		1,303		282

Total	$	7,294	$	7,377	$	1,126

⁽¹⁾

The recorded investment is equal to the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest receivable net of unamortized deferred fees and costs.

The following table provides the average recorded investment and interest income recognized for our TDR loans.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012
(Dollars in millions)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	6,718	$	100	$	5,036	$	81
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		1,412		27		1,206		26

Total	$	8,130	$	127	$	6,242	$	107


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012
(Dollars in millions)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	6,524	$	196	$	4,772	$	154
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		1,391		54		1,158		51

Total	$	7,915	$	250	$	5,930	$	205

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following table provides information regarding the loan status and aging of TDR loans that are past due.


	TDR Loan Delinquencies
	June 30, 2013					December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance		%			Balance		%
Loans in deferment ⁽¹⁾	$	656				$	574
Loans in forbearance ⁽²⁾		649					544
Loans in repayment and percentage of each status:
Loans current		5,365		78.0	%		4,619		73.8	%
Loans delinquent 31-60 days ⁽³⁾		450		6.5			478		7.6
Loans delinquent 61-90 days ⁽³⁾		308		4.5			254		4.1
Loans delinquent greater than 90 days ⁽³⁾		755		11.0			908		14.5

Total TDR loans in repayment		6,878		100	%		6,259		100	%

Total TDR loans, gross	$	8,183				$	7,377

⁽¹⁾

Loans for customers who have requested and qualify for permitted program deferments such as military, unemployment, or economic hardships.

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.

The following table provides the amount of modified loans that resulted in a TDR in the periods presented. Additionally, the table summarizes charge-offs occurring in the TDR portfolio, as well as TDRs for which a payment default occurred in the current period within 12 months of the loan first being designated as a TDR. We define payment default as 60 days past due for this disclosure. The majority of our loans that are considered TDRs involve a temporary forbearance of payments and do not change the contractual interest rate of the loan.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013						2012
(Dollars in millions)	Modified Loans ⁽¹⁾		Charge- Offs ⁽²⁾		Payment Default		Modified Loans ⁽¹⁾		Charge- Offs ⁽²⁾		Payment Default
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	491	$	84	$	159	$	554	$	82	$	376
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		75		31		45		104		33		124

Total	$	566	$	115	$	204	$	658	$	115	$	500


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013						2012
(Dollars in millions)	Modified Loans ⁽¹⁾		Charge- Offs ⁽²⁾		Payment Default		Modified Loans ⁽¹⁾		Charge- Offs ⁽²⁾		Payment Default
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	1,036	$	181	$	375	$	1,210	$	148	$	780
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		165		65		101		245		62		252

Total	$	1,201	$	246	$	476	$	1,455	$	210	$	1,032

⁽¹⁾	Represents period ending balance of loans that have been modified during the period and resulted in a TDR.

⁽²⁾	Represents loans that charged off that were classified as TDRs.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.	Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

Accrued Interest Receivable

The following table provides information regarding accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loans. The table also discloses the amount of accrued interest on loans greater than 90 days past due as compared to our allowance for uncollectible interest. The allowance for uncollectible interest exceeds the amount of accrued interest on our 90 days past due portfolio for all periods presented.


	Accrued Interest Receivable
(Dollars in millions)	Total		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Allowance for Uncollectible Interest
June 30, 2013
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	838	$	32	$	47
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		90		12		22

Total	$	928	$	44	$	69

December 31, 2012
Private Education Loans — Traditional	$	798	$	39	$	45
Private Education Loans — Non-Traditional		106		16		22

Total	$	904	$	55	$	67

3.	Borrowings

The following table summarizes our borrowings.


	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Short Term		Long Term		Total		Short Term		Long Term		Total
Unsecured borrowings:
Senior unsecured debt	$	3,063	$	14,433	$	17,496	$	2,319	$	15,446	$	17,765
Brokered deposits		1,298		2,247		3,545		979		3,088		4,067
Retail and other deposits		3,686		—		3,686		3,247		—		3,247
Other ⁽¹⁾		825		—		825		1,609		—		1,609

Total unsecured borrowings		8,872		16,680		25,552		8,154		18,534		26,688

Secured borrowings:
FFELP Loan securitizations		—		92,428		92,428		—		105,525		105,525
Private Education Loan securitizations		—		20,594		20,594		—		19,656		19,656
ED Conduit Program Facility		—		—		—		9,551		—		9,551
FFELP ABCP Facilities		6,524		2,816		9,340		—		4,154		4,154
Private Education Loan ABCP Facility		—		—		—		—		1,070		1,070
Acquisition financing ⁽²⁾		—		505		505		—		673		673
FHLB-DM Facility		1,115		1,220		2,335		2,100		—		2,100

Total secured borrowings		7,639		117,563		125,202		11,651		131,078		142,729

Total before hedge accounting adjustments		16,511		134,243		150,754		19,805		149,612		169,417
Hedge accounting adjustments		47		1,636		1,683		51		2,789		2,840

Total	$	16,558	$	135,879	$	152,437	$	19,856	$	152,401	$	172,257

⁽¹⁾	“Other” primarily consists of the obligation to return cash collateral held related to derivative exposures.

⁽²⁾	Relates to the acquisition of $25 billion of student loans at the end of 2010.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3.	Borrowings (continued)

Secured Borrowings

The tables below summarize all of our financing entities that are VIEs which we consolidate as a result of being the entities’ primary beneficiary. As such, these financing VIEs are accounted for as secured borrowings. We consolidate the following financing VIEs:


	June 30, 2013
	Debt Outstanding						Carrying Amount of Assets Securing Debt Outstanding
(Dollars in millions)	Short Term		Long Term		Total		Loans		Cash		Other Assets		Total
Secured Borrowings — VIEs:
FFELP Loan securitizations	$	—	$	92,428	$	92,428	$	93,988	$	3,177	$	649	$	97,814
Private Education Loan securitizations		—		20,594		20,594		26,084		413		540		27,037
FFELP ABCP Facilities		6,524		2,816		9,340		9,674		108		176		9,958

Total before hedge accounting adjustments		6,524		115,838		122,362		129,746		3,698		1,365		134,809
Hedge accounting adjustments		—		666		666		—		—		476		476

Total	$	6,524	$	116,504	$	123,028	$	129,746	$	3,698	$	1,841	$	135,285


	December 31, 2012
	Debt Outstanding						Carrying Amount of Assets Securing Debt Outstanding
(Dollars in millions)	Short Term		Long Term		Total		Loans		Cash		Other Assets		Total
Secured Borrowings — VIEs:
FFELP Loan securitizations	$	—	$	105,525	$	105,525	$	107,009	$	3,652	$	608	$	111,269
Private Education Loan securitizations		—		19,656		19,656		24,618		385		545		25,548
ED Conduit Program Facility		9,551		—		9,551		9,645		410		134		10,189
FFELP ABCP Facility		—		4,154		4,154		4,405		77		63		4,545
Private Education Loan ABCP Facility		—		1,070		1,070		1,454		302		33		1,789

Total before hedge accounting adjustments		9,551		130,405		139,956		147,131		4,826		1,383		153,340
Hedge accounting adjustments		—		1,113		1,113		—		—		929		929

Total	$	9,551	$	131,518	$	141,069	$	147,131	$	4,826	$	2,312	$	154,269

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3.	Borrowings (continued)

Securitizations

The following table summarizes the securitization transactions that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013.

(Dollars in millions)

AAA-rated bonds

Issue

Date Issued

Total
Issued

Weighted Average
Interest Rate

Weighted
Average
Life

FFELP:

2012-1

January 2012

765

1 month LIBOR plus 0.91%

4.6 years

2012-2

March 2012

824

1 month LIBOR plus 0.70%

4.7 years

2012-3

May 2012

1,252

1 month LIBOR plus 0.65%

4.6 years

2012-4

June 2012

1,491

⁽¹⁾

1 month LIBOR plus 1.10%

8.2 years

2011-3

July 2012

N/A (Retained B Notes sold)

2012-4

July 2012

N/A (Retained B Notes sold)

2012-5

July 2012

1,252

1 month LIBOR plus 0.67%

4.5 years

2012-6

September 2012

1,249

1 month LIBOR plus 0.62%

4.6 years

2012-7

November 2012

1,251

1 month LIBOR plus 0.55%

4.5 years

2012-8

December 2012

1,527

1 month LIBOR plus 0.90%

7.8 years

Total bonds issued in 2012

9,680

Total loan amount securitized in 2012

9,565

2013-1

February 2013

1,249

1 month LIBOR plus 0.46%

4.3 years

2013-2

April 2013

1,246

1 month LIBOR plus 0.45%

4.4 years

2013-3

June 2013

1,246

1 month LIBOR plus 0.54%

4.5 years

Total bonds issued in six months ended June 30, 2013

3,741

Total loan amount securitized in six months ended June 30, 2013

3,748

Private Education:

2012-A

February 2012

547

1 month LIBOR plus 2.17%

3.0 years

2012-B

April 2012

891

1 month LIBOR plus 2.12%

2.9 years

2012-C

May 2012

1,135

1 month LIBOR plus 1.77%

2.6 years

2012-D

July 2012

640

1 month LIBOR plus 1.69%

2.5 years

2012-E

October 2012

976

1 month LIBOR plus 1.22%

2.6 years

Total bonds issued in 2012

4,189

Total loan amount securitized in 2012

5,557

2013-R1

January 2013

254

1 month LIBOR plus 1.75%

6.3 years

2013-A

March 2013

1,108

1 month LIBOR plus 0.81%

2.6 years

2013-B

May 2013

1,135

1 month LIBOR plus 0.89%

2.7 years

Total bonds issued in six months ended June 30, 2013

2,497

Total loan amount securitized in six months ended June 30, 2013

2,613

⁽¹⁾	Total size excludes subordinated tranche that was retained at issuance totaling $45 million.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3.	Borrowings (continued)

2013 Sales of FFELP Securitization Trust Residual Interests

On February 13, 2013, we sold the Residual Interest in a FFELP Loan securitization trust to a third party. We will continue to service the student loans in the trust under existing agreements. The sale removed securitization trust assets of $3.82 billion and related liabilities of $3.68 billion from our balance sheet.

On April 11, 2013, we sold the Residual Interest in a FFELP Loan securitization trust to a third party. We will continue to service the student loans in the trust under existing agreements. The sale removed securitization trust assets of $2.03 billion and related liabilities of $1.99 billion from our balance sheet.

On June 13, 2013, we sold the three Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts to a third party. We will continue to service the student loans in the trusts under existing agreements. The sale removed securitization trust assets of $6.60 billion and related liabilities of $6.42 billion from our balance sheet.

Additional, Recent Borrowing-Related Transactions

Senior Unsecured Debt

On January 28, 2013, we issued $1.5 billion of senior unsecured bonds.

FFELP ABCP Facility

On June 10, 2013, we closed on a new $6.8 billion credit facility that matures in June 2014 to facilitate the term securitization of FFELP Loans. The facility was used in June 2013 to refinance all of the FFELP Loans previously financed through the U.S. Department of Education’s (“ED”) Conduit Program. The facility cannot be used to borrow any additional amounts. As a result, we ended our participation in the ED Conduit Program prior to the January 19, 2014 maturity date.

The cost of borrowing under the facility is the yield rate (either 30-day LIBOR daily average or commercial paper issuance cost) plus 0.50 percent, excluding up-front-commitment fees. Failure to pay off the facility on the maturity date would result in a 90-day extension of the facility with the interest rate increasing from LIBOR plus 0.75 percent to LIBOR plus 1.50 percent over that period. If, at the end of that period the facility has not been repaid, a default rate of LIBOR plus 3.00 percent would be payable until either the notes are repaid in full or the collateral is foreclosed upon. This default rate would also be triggered by the occurrence of a termination event. The facility is subject to termination under certain circumstances. Our borrowings under the facility are non-recourse. As of June 30, 2013, there was $6.5 billion outstanding in the facility. The book basis of the assets securing the facility as of June 30, 2013 was $6.8 billion.

Private Education Loan ABCP Facility

On July 17, 2013, we closed on a $1.1 billion ABCP borrowing facility that matures on August 15, 2015. The facility will be used to fund the call and redemption of our SLM 2009-D Private Education Loan Trust ABS, anticipated to occur on August 15, 2013.

The cost of borrowing under the facility is commercial paper issuance cost plus 0.75 percent, excluding up-front commitment fees. If outstandings under the facility exceed $825 million after July 15, 2014 and $550 million after January 15, 2015, the cost increases to commercial paper issuance plus 1.50 percent. Failure to pay off the facility on the maturity date would result in the interest rate increasing to LIBOR plus 3.00 percent until the notes are repaid in full or the collateral is foreclosed upon. Our borrowings under the facility are non-recourse.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4.	Derivative Financial Instruments

Our risk management strategy and use of and accounting for derivatives have not materially changed from that discussed in our 2012 Form 10-K. Please refer to “Note 7 — Derivative Financial Instruments” in our 2012 Form 10-K for a full discussion.

Summary of Derivative Financial Statement Impact

The following tables summarize the fair values and notional amounts of all derivative instruments at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and their impact on other comprehensive income and earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Impact of Derivatives on Consolidated Balance Sheet


		Cash Flow					Fair Value						Trading						Total
(Dollars in millions)	Hedged Risk Exposure	June 30, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			Dec. 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			Dec. 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Values ⁽¹⁾
Derivative Assets:
Interest rate swaps	Interest rate	$	17	$	—		$	924		$	1,396		$	84		$	150		$	1,025		$	1,546
Cross-currency interest rate swaps	Foreign currency & interest rate		—		—			785			1,165			—			70			785			1,235
Other ⁽²⁾	Interest rate		—		—			—			—			2			4			2			4

Total derivative assets ⁽³⁾			17		—			1,709			2,561			86			224			1,812			2,785
Derivative Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	Interest rate		—		(11	)		(106	)		(1	)		(208	)		(197	)		(314	)		(209	)
Floor Income Contracts	Interest rate		—		—			—			—			(1,675	)		(2,154	)		(1,675	)		(2,154	)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps	Foreign currency & interest rate		—		—			(278	)		(136	)		(10	)		—			(288	)		(136	)
Other ⁽²⁾	Interest rate		—		—			—			—			(17	)		—			(17	)		—

Total derivative liabilities ⁽³⁾			—		(11	)		(384	)		(137	)		(1,910	)		(2,351	)		(2,294	)		(2,499	)

Net total derivatives		$	17	$	(11	)	$	1,325		$	2,424		$	(1,824	)	$	(2,127	)	$	(482	)	$	286

⁽¹⁾

Fair values reported are exclusive of collateral held and pledged and accrued interest. Assets and liabilities are presented without consideration of master netting agreements. Derivatives are carried on the balance sheet based on net position by counterparty under master netting agreements, and classified in other assets or other liabilities depending on whether in a net receivable or payable position.

⁽²⁾	“Other” includes embedded derivatives bifurcated from securitization debt as well as derivatives related to our Total Return Swap Facility and back-to-back private credit floors.

⁽³⁾	The following table reconciles gross positions without the impact of master netting agreements to the balance sheet classification:


	Other Assets						Other Liabilities
(Dollar in millions)	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Gross position	$	1,812		$	2,785		$	(2,294	)	$	(2,499	)
Impact of master netting agreements		(436	)		(544	)		436			544

Derivative values with impact of master netting agreements (as carried on balance sheet)		1,376			2,241			(1,858	)		(1,955	)
Cash collateral (held) pledged		(824	)		(1,423	)		828			973

Net position	$	552		$	818		$	(1,030	)	$	(982	)

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4.	Derivative Financial Instruments (continued)

The above fair values include adjustments for counterparty credit risk both for when we are exposed to the counterparty, net of collateral postings, and when the counterparty is exposed to us, net of collateral postings. The net adjustments decreased the overall net asset positions at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by $87 million and $111 million, respectively. In addition, the above fair values reflect adjustments for illiquid derivatives as indicated by a wide bid/ask spread in the interest rate indices to which the derivatives are indexed. These adjustments decreased the overall net asset positions at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by $97 million and $107 million, respectively.


	Cash Flow				Fair Value				Trading				Total
(Dollars in billions)	June 30, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012		June 30, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012		June 30, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012		June 30, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012
Notional Values:
Interest rate swaps	$	0.5	$	0.7	$	15.4	$	15.8	$	54.7	$	56.9	$	70.6	$	73.4
Floor Income Contracts		—		—		—		—		31.8		51.6		31.8		51.6
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		—		—		11.8		13.7		0.3		0.3		12.1		14.0
Other ⁽¹⁾		—		—		—		—		2.9		1.4		2.9		1.4

Total derivatives	$	0.5	$	0.7	$	27.2	$	29.5	$	89.7	$	110.2	$	117.4	$	140.4

⁽¹⁾	“Other” includes embedded derivatives bifurcated from securitization debt, as well as derivatives related to our Total Return Swap Facility and back to back private credit floors.

Impact of Derivatives on Consolidated Statements of Income


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾						Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives ⁽³⁾						Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item ⁽¹⁾						Total Gain (Loss)
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
Fair Value Hedges:
Interest rate swaps	$	(404	)	$	193		$	104		$	115		$	443		$	(220	)	$	143		$	88
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		34			(654	)		26			41			(80	)		816			(20	)		203

Total fair value derivatives		(370	)		(461	)		130			156			363			596			123			291
Cash Flow Hedges:
Interest rate swaps		—			—			(2	)		(8	)		—			—			(2	)		(8	)

Total cash flow derivatives		—			—			(2	)		(8	)		—			—			(2	)		(8	)
Trading:
Interest rate swaps		(58	)		(10	)		14			32			—			—			(44	)		22
Floor Income Contracts		297			50			(198	)		(222	)		—			—			99			(172	)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		(32	)		10			10			2			—			—			(22	)		12
Other		(8	)		9			—			—			—			—			(8	)		9

Total trading derivatives		199			59			(174	)		(188	)		—			—			25			(129	)

Total		(171	)		(402	)		(46	)		(40	)		363			596			146			154
Less: realized gains (losses) recorded in interest expense		—			—			128			148			—			—			128			148

Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net	$	(171	)	$	(402	)	$	(174	)	$	(188	)	$	363		$	596		$	18		$	6

⁽¹⁾	Recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net” in the consolidated statements of income.

⁽²⁾	Represents ineffectiveness related to cash flow hedges.

⁽³⁾	For fair value and cash flow hedges, recorded in interest expense. For trading derivatives, recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net.”

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4.	Derivative Financial Instruments (continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾						Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives ⁽³⁾						Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item ⁽¹⁾					Total Gain (Loss)
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013		2012			2013			2012
Fair Value Hedges:
Interest rate swaps	$	(576	)	$	45		$	214		$	228		$	638	$	(65	)	$	276		$	208
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		(522	)		(462	)		46			102			473		364			(3	)		4

Total fair value derivatives		(1,098	)		(417	)		260			330			1,111		299			273			212
Cash Flow Hedges:
Interest rate swaps		—			—			(5	)		(15	)		—		—			(5	)		(15	)

Total cash flow derivatives		—			—			(5	)		(15	)		—		—			(5	)		(15	)
Trading:
Interest rate swaps		(77	)		(49	)		37			67			—		—			(40	)		18
Floor Income Contracts		486			186			(411	)		(437	)		—		—			75			(251	)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		(79	)		(23	)		31			3			—		—			(48	)		(20	)
Other		(13	)		5			—			—			—		—			(13	)		5

Total trading derivatives		317			119			(343	)		(367	)		—		—			(26	)		(248	)

Total		(781	)		(298	)		(88	)		(52	)		1,111		299			242			(51	)
Less: realized gains (losses) recorded in interest expense		—			—			255			315			—		—			255			315

Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net	$	(781	)	$	(298	)	$	(343	)	$	(367	)	$	1,111	$	299		$	(13	)	$	(366	)

⁽¹⁾	Recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net” in the consolidated statements of income.

⁽²⁾	Represents ineffectiveness related to cash flow hedges.

⁽³⁾	For fair value and cash flow hedges, recorded in interest expense. For trading derivatives, recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net.”

Collateral

Collateral held and pledged related to derivative exposures between us and our derivative counterparties are detailed in the following table:


(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Collateral held:
Cash (obligation to return cash collateral is recorded in short-term borrowings) ⁽¹⁾	$	824	$	1,423
Securities at fair value — on-balance sheet securitization derivatives (not recorded in financial statements) ⁽²⁾		483		613

Total collateral held	$	1,307	$	2,036

Derivative asset at fair value including accrued interest	$	1,642	$	2,570

Collateral pledged to others:
Cash (right to receive return of cash collateral is recorded in investments)	$	828	$	973

Total collateral pledged	$	828	$	973

Derivative liability at fair value including accrued interest and premium receivable	$	1,154	$	1,204

⁽¹⁾	At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $0 and $9 million, respectively, were held in restricted cash accounts.

⁽²⁾	The trusts do not have the ability to sell or re-pledge securities they hold as collateral.

Our corporate derivatives contain credit contingent features. At our current unsecured credit rating, we have fully collateralized our corporate derivative liability position (including accrued interest and net of premiums receivable) of $888 million with our counterparties. Further downgrades would not result in any additional

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4.	Derivative Financial Instruments (continued)

collateral requirements, except to increase the frequency of collateral calls. Two counterparties have the right to terminate the contracts with further downgrades. We currently have a liability position with these derivative counterparties (including accrued interest and net of premiums receivable) of $193 million and have posted $183 million of collateral to these counterparties. If the credit contingent feature was triggered for these two counterparties and the counterparties exercised their right to terminate, we would be required to deliver additional assets of $10 million to settle the contracts. Trust related derivatives do not contain credit contingent features related to our or the trusts’ credit ratings.

5.	Other Assets

The following table provides the detail of our other assets.


	June 30, 2013					December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Ending Balance		% of Balance			Ending Balance		% of Balance
Accrued interest receivable, net	$	2,136		30	%	$	2,147		26	%
Derivatives at fair value		1,376		20			2,241		27
Income tax asset, net current and deferred		1,235		18			1,478		18
Accounts receivable		977		14			1,111		13
Benefit and insurance-related investments		474		7			474		6
Fixed assets, net		232		3			215		3
Other loans, net		117		2			137		2
Other		500		6			470		5

Total	$	7,047		100	%	$	8,273		100	%

The “Derivatives at fair value” line in the above table represents the fair value of our derivatives in a gain position by counterparty, exclusive of accrued interest and collateral. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these balances included $1.3 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively, of cross-currency interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges that were offset by an increase in interest-bearing liabilities related to the hedged debt. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the cumulative mark-to-market adjustment to the hedged debt was $(1.7) billion and $(2.8) billion, respectively.

6.	Stockholders’ Equity

The following table summarizes our common share repurchases and issuances.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Common shares repurchased ⁽¹⁾		9,096,144		23,836,964		19,316,948		40,540,146
Average purchase price per share ⁽²⁾	$	22.12	$	14.34	$	20.72	$	15.04

Shares repurchased related to employee stock-based compensation plans ⁽³⁾		3,040,788		349,655		5,365,363		2,406,632
Average purchase price per share	$	22.35	$	14.83	$	20.51	$	15.26

Common shares issued ⁽⁴⁾		4,115,424		426,168		8,273,219		3,597,652

⁽¹⁾

Common shares purchased under our share repurchase program, of which $0 million remained available as of June 30, 2013.

⁽²⁾

Average purchase price per share includes purchase commission costs.

⁽³⁾

Comprises shares withheld from stock option exercises and vesting of restricted stock for employees’ tax withholding obligations and shares tendered by employees to satisfy option exercise costs.

⁽⁴⁾

Common shares issued under our various compensation and benefit plans.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6.	Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

The closing price of our common stock on June 28, 2013 was $22.86.

Dividend and Share Repurchase Program

In the second quarter 2013, we paid a common stock dividend of $0.15 per common share.

We repurchased 9 million shares of common stock for $201 million in the second quarter of 2013, or an aggregate of 19 million shares for $400 million in the first half of 2013, fully utilizing the Company’s February 2013 share repurchase program authorization. In July 2013, the Company authorized $400 million to be utilized in a new common share repurchase program that does not have an expiration date.

In 2012, we authorized the repurchase of up to $900 million of outstanding common stock in open market transactions and we repurchased 58 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $900 million.

7.	Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) are calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations follows.


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions, except per share data)	2013		2012			2013		2012
Numerator:
Net income attributable to SLM Corporation	$	543	$	292		$	889	$	403
Preferred stock dividends		5		5			10		10

Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock	$	538	$	287		$	879	$	393

Denominator:
Weighted average shares used to compute basic EPS		440		482			445		493
Effect of dilutive securities:
Dilutive effect of stock options, non-vested deferred compensation and restricted stock, restricted stock units and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) ⁽¹⁾		8		6			8		6

Dilutive potential common shares ⁽²⁾		8		6			8		6

Weighted average shares used to compute diluted EPS		448		488			453		499

Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to SLM Corporation:
Continuing operations	$	1.14	$	.60		$	1.90	$	.81
Discontinued operations		.08		(.01	)		.07		(.01	)

Total	$	1.22	$	.59		$	1.97	$	.80

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to SLM Corporation:
Continuing operations	$	1.12	$	.60		$	1.87	$	.80
Discontinued operations		.08		(.01	)		.07		(.01	)

Total	$	1.20	$	.59		$	1.94	$	.79

⁽¹⁾

Includes the potential dilutive effect of additional common shares that are issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, non-vested deferred compensation and restricted stock, restricted stock units, and the outstanding commitment to issue shares under the ESPP, determined by the treasury stock method.

⁽²⁾

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, securities covering approximately 4 million and 14 million shares, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, securities covering approximately 5 million and 12 million shares, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8.	Fair Value Measurements

We use estimates of fair value in applying various accounting standards in our financial statements.

We categorize our fair value estimates based on a hierarchical framework associated with three levels of price transparency utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value. Please refer to “Note 13 — Fair Value Measurements” in our 2012 Form 10-K for a full discussion.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no significant transfers of financial instruments between levels, or changes in our methodology or assumptions used to value our financial instruments.

The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments that are marked-to-market on a recurring basis.


	Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
	June 30, 2013											December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total
Assets
Available-for-sale investments:
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	64		$	—		$	64		$	—	$	63		$	—		$	63
Guaranteed investment contracts		—		8			—			8			—		9			—			9
Other		—		8			—			8			—		9			—			9

Total available-for-sale investments		—		80			—			80			—		81			—			81
Derivative instruments: ⁽¹⁾
Interest rate swaps		—		966			59			1,025			—		1,444			102			1,546
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		—		24			761			785			—		48			1,187			1,235
Other		—		—			2			2			—		—			4			4

Total derivative assets ⁽³⁾		—		990			822			1,812			—		1,492			1,293			2,785

Total	$	—	$	1,070		$	822		$	1,892		$	—	$	1,573		$	1,293		$	2,866

Liabilities ⁽²⁾
Derivative instruments ⁽¹⁾
Interest rate swaps	$	—	$	(167	)	$	(147	)	$	(314	)	$	—	$	(34	)	$	(175	)	$	(209	)
Floor Income Contracts		—		(1,675	)		—			(1,675	)		—		(2,154	)		—			(2,154	)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		—		(13	)		(275	)		(288	)		—		(2	)		(134	)		(136	)
Other		—		—			(17	)		(17	)		—		—			—			—

Total derivative liabilities ⁽³⁾		—		(1,855	)		(439	)		(2,294	)		—		(2,190	)		(309	)		(2,499	)

Total	$	—	$	(1,855	)	$	(439	)	$	(2,294	)	$	—	$	(2,190	)	$	(309	)	$	(2,499	)

⁽¹⁾	Fair value of derivative instruments excludes accrued interest and the value of collateral.

⁽²⁾	Borrowings which are the hedged items in a fair value hedge relationship and which are adjusted for changes in value due to benchmark interest rates only are not carried at full fair value and are not reflected in this table.

⁽³⁾	See “Note 4 — Derivative Financial Instruments” for a reconciliation of gross positions without the impact of master netting agreements to the balance sheet classification.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8.	Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The following tables summarize the change in balance sheet carrying value associated with level 3 financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013												2012
	Derivative instruments												Derivative instruments
(Dollars in millions)	Interest Rate Swaps			Cross Currency Interest Rate Swaps			Other			Total Derivative Instruments			Interest Rate Swaps			Cross Currency Interest Rate Swaps			Other			Total Derivative Instruments
Balance, beginning of period	$	(76	)	$	470		$	—		$	394		$	(56	)	$	1,145		$	(4	)	$	1,085
Total gains/(losses) (realized and unrealized):
Included in earnings ⁽¹⁾		(10	)		48			(8	)		30			(18	)		(494	)		9			(503	)
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Settlements		(2	)		(32	)		(7	)		(41	)		(9	)		(31	)		—			(40	)
Transfers in and/or out of level 3		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Balance, end of period	$	(88	)	$	486		$	(15	)	$	383		$	(83	)	$	620		$	5		$	542

Change in unrealized gains/(losses) relating to instruments still held at the reporting date ⁽²⁾	$	(12	)	$	61		$	(10	)	$	39		$	(26	)	$	(525	)	$	9		$	(542	)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013												2012
	Derivative instruments												Derivative instruments
(Dollars in millions)	Interest Rate Swaps			Cross Currency Interest Rate Swaps			Other			Total Derivative Instruments			Interest Rate Swaps			Cross Currency Interest Rate Swaps			Other			Total Derivative Instruments
Balance, beginning of period	$	(73	)	$	1,053		$	4		$	984		$	(40	)	$	1,021		$	1		$	982
Total gains/(losses) (realized and unrealized):
Included in earnings ⁽¹⁾		(4	)		(499	)		(13	)		(516	)		(23	)		(323	)		4			(342	)
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Settlements		(11	)		(68	)		(6	)		(85	)		(20	)		(78	)		—			(98	)
Transfers in and/or out of level 3		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Balance, end of period	$	(88	)	$	486		$	(15	)	$	383		$	(83	)	$	620		$	5		$	542

Change in unrealized gains/(losses) relating to instruments still held at the reporting date ⁽²⁾	$	(15	)	$	(430	)	$	(12	)	$	(457	)	$	(41	)	$	(402	)	$	5		$	(438	)

⁽¹⁾

“Included in earnings” is comprised of the following amounts recorded in the specified line item in the consolidated statements of income:


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012			2013			2012
Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net	$	9	$	(533	)	$	(553	)	$	(417	)
Interest expense		21		30			37			75

Total	$	30	$	(503	)	$	(516	)	$	(342	)

⁽²⁾

Recorded in “gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net” in the consolidated statements of income.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8.	Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The following table presents the significant inputs that are unobservable or from inactive markets used in the recurring valuations of the level 3 financial instruments detailed above.


(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value at June 30, 2013		Valuation Technique	Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Derivatives
Consumer Price Index/LIBOR basis swaps	$	52	Discounted cash flow	Bid/ask adjustment to discount rate	0.04% — 0.05% (0.05%)

Prime/LIBOR basis swaps		(140)	Discounted cash flow	Constant prepayment rate	4.3%
				Bid/ask adjustment to discount rate	0.08% — 0.08% (0.08%)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		486	Discounted cash flow	Constant prepayment rate	2.6%
Other		(15)

Total	$	383

The significant inputs that are unobservable or from inactive markets related to our level 3 derivatives detailed in the table above would be expected to have the following impacts to the valuations:

•

Consumer Price Index/LIBOR basis swaps — These swaps do not actively trade in the markets as indicated by a wide bid/ask spread. A wider bid/ask spread will result in a decrease in the overall valuation.

•

Prime/LIBOR basis swaps — These swaps do not actively trade in the markets as indicated by a wide bid/ask spread. A wider bid/ask spread will result in a decrease in the overall valuation. In addition, the unobservable inputs include constant prepayment rates of the underlying securitization trust the swap references. A decrease in this input will result in a longer weighted average life of the swap which will increase the value for swaps in a gain position and decrease the value for swaps in a loss position, everything else equal. The opposite is true for an increase in the input.

•

Cross-currency interest rate swaps — The unobservable inputs used in these valuations are constant prepayment rates of the underlying securitization trust the swap references. A decrease in this input will result in a longer weighted average life of the swap. All else equal in a typical currency market, this will result in a decrease to the valuation due to the delay in the cash flows of the currency exchanges as well as diminished liquidity in the forward exchange markets as you increase the term. The opposite is true for an increase in the input.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8.	Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The following table summarizes the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities, including derivative financial instruments.


	June 30, 2013									December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value			Carrying Value			Difference			Fair Value			Carrying Value			Difference
Earning assets
FFELP Loans	$	108,033		$	108,491		$	(458	)	$	125,042		$	125,612		$	(570	)
Private Education Loans		36,531			37,116			(585	)		36,081			36,934			(853	)
Cash and investments ⁽¹⁾		8,373			8,373			—			9,994			9,994			—

Total earning assets		152,937			153,980			(1,043	)		171,117			172,540			(1,423	)

Interest-bearing liabilities
Short-term borrowings		16,563			16,558			(5	)		19,861			19,856			(5	)
Long-term borrowings		131,483			135,879			4,396			146,210			152,401			6,191

Total interest-bearing liabilities		148,046			152,437			4,391			166,071			172,257			6,186

Derivative financial instruments
Floor Income Contracts		(1,675	)		(1,675	)		—			(2,154	)		(2,154	)		—
Interest rate swaps		711			711			—			1,337			1,337			—
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		497			497			—			1,099			1,099			—
Other		(15	)		(15	)		—			4			4			—

Excess of net asset fair value over carrying value							$	3,348								$	4,763

⁽¹⁾

“Cash and investments” includes available-for-sale investments that consist of investments that are primarily agency securities whose cost basis is $81 million and $78 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, versus a fair value of $80 million and $81 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The following includes a discussion of financial instruments whose fair value is included for disclosure purposes only in the table above along with their level in the fair value hierarchy.

Student Loans

FFELP Loans

Fair values for FFELP Loans were determined by modeling loan cash flows using stated terms of the loans and internally-developed assumptions. The significant assumptions used to determine fair value are prepayment speeds, default rates, cost of funds, capital levels, and expected Repayment Borrower Benefits to be earned. In addition, the Floor Income component of our FFELP Loan portfolio is valued with option models using both observable market inputs and internally developed inputs. A number of significant inputs into the models are internally derived and not observable to market participants. While the resulting fair value can be validated against market transactions where we are a participant, these markets are not considered active. As such, these are level 3 valuations.

Private Education Loans

Fair values for Private Education Loans were determined by modeling loan cash flows using stated terms of the loans and internally-developed assumptions. The significant assumptions used to determine fair value are

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8.	Fair Value Measurements (continued)

prepayment speeds, default rates, recovery rates, cost of funds and capital levels. A number of significant inputs into the models are internally derived and not observable to market participants nor can the resulting fair values be validated against market transactions. As such, these are level 3 valuations.

Cash and Investments (Including “Restricted Cash and Investments”)

Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost. Carrying value approximated fair value. These are level 2 valuations.

Borrowings

The full fair value of all borrowings is disclosed. Fair value was determined through standard bond pricing models and option models (when applicable) using the stated terms of the borrowings, observable yield curves, foreign currency exchange rates, volatilities from active markets or from quotes from broker-dealers. Fair value adjustments for unsecured corporate debt are made based on indicative quotes from observable trades and spreads on credit default swaps specific to the Company. Fair value adjustments for secured borrowings are based on indicative quotes from broker-dealers. These fair value adjustments are based on inputs from inactive markets. As such, these are level 3 valuations.

9.	Commitments and Contingencies

At the time of this filing, Sallie Mae Bank (the “Bank”) remains subject to a cease and desist order originally issued in August 2008 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (“UDFI”). In July 2013, the FDIC notified the Bank that it plans to replace the existing cease and desist order with a new formal enforcement action that will more specifically address certain cited violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, including with respect to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and its implementing regulation, Regulation B, which could include civil money penalties and restitution obligations. The Bank has not been notified by the UDFI that it intends to join the FDIC in issuing the new enforcement action. We have made and continue to make changes to the Bank’s oversight of significant activities performed outside the Bank by Company affiliates, including in connection with our pursuit of a strategic plan to separate our existing organization into two publicly traded companies. We could be required to, or otherwise determine to, make further changes to the business practices and products of the Bank and our other affiliates to respond to regulatory concerns. At this time, we do not believe it is possible to estimate a range of potential exposure, if any, to amounts that may be payable or costs that must be incurred to comply with the terms of any order.

In the ordinary course of business, we and our subsidiaries are defendants in or parties to pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. These actions and proceedings may be based on alleged violations of consumer protection, securities, employment and other laws. In certain of these actions and proceedings, claims for substantial monetary damage are asserted against us and our subsidiaries.

In the ordinary course of business, we and our subsidiaries are subject to regulatory examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries and investigations. In connection with formal and informal inquiries in these cases, we and our subsidiaries receive numerous requests, subpoenas and orders for documents, testimony and information in connection with various aspects of our regulated activities.

In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such litigation and regulatory matters, we cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing or the ultimate

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss, fines or penalties related to each pending matter may be.

We are required to establish reserves for litigation and regulatory matters where those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. When loss contingencies are not both probable and estimable, we do not establish reserves.

Based on current knowledge, reserves have been established for certain litigation or regulatory matters where the loss is both probable and estimable. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that loss contingencies, if any, arising from pending investigations, litigation or regulatory matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity, results of operations or cash flows.

10.

Segment Reporting

Consumer Lending Segment

In this segment, we originate, acquire, finance and service Private Education Loans. The Private Education Loans we make are primarily to bridge the gap between the cost of higher education and the amount funded through financial aid, federal loans or customers’ resources. In this segment, we earn net interest income on the Private Education Loan portfolio (after provision for loan losses) as well as servicing fees, primarily consisting of late fees.

The following table includes asset information for our Consumer Lending segment.


(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Private Education Loans, net	$	37,116	$	36,934
Cash and investments ⁽¹⁾		3,032		2,731
Other		3,250		3,275

Total assets	$	43,398	$	42,940

⁽¹⁾

Includes restricted cash and investments.

Business Services Segment

Our Business Services segment generates the majority of its revenue from servicing our FFELP Loan portfolio. We also provide servicing, loan default aversion and defaulted loan collection services for loans on behalf of Guarantors of FFELP Loans and other institutions, including ED, as well as 529 college-savings plan program management services. We also operate a consumer savings network that provides financial rewards on everyday purchases to help families save for college.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Business Services segment had total assets of $1.1 billion and $867 million, respectively.

FFELP Loans Segment

Our FFELP Loans segment consists of our $108.5 billion FFELP Loan portfolio at June 30, 2013 and underlying debt and capital funding these loans. FFELP Loans are no longer originated but we continue to seek to acquire FFELP Loan portfolios to leverage our servicing scale to generate incremental earnings and cash flow. This segment is expected to generate significant amounts of cash as the FFELP portfolio amortizes.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.

Segment Reporting (continued)

The following table includes asset information for our FFELP Loans segment.


(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
FFELP Loans, net	$	108,491	$	125,612
Cash and investments ⁽¹⁾		4,680		5,766
Other		3,021		4,286

Total assets	$	116,192	$	135,664

⁽¹⁾

Includes restricted cash and investments.

Other Segment

Our Other segment primarily consists of activities of our holding company, including the repurchase of debt, the corporate liquidity portfolio and all overhead. We also include results from smaller wind-down and discontinued operations within this segment

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Other segment had total assets of $826 million and $1.8 billion, respectively.

Measure of Profitability

The tables below include the condensed operating results for each of our reportable segments. Management, including the chief operating decision makers, evaluates the Company on certain performance measures that we refer to as “Core Earnings” performance measures for each operating segment. We use “Core Earnings” to manage each business segment because “Core Earnings” reflect adjustments to GAAP financial results for two items, discussed below, that create significant volatility mostly due to timing factors generally beyond the control of management. Accordingly, we believe that “Core Earnings” provide management with a useful basis from which to better evaluate results from ongoing operations against the business plan or against results from prior periods. Consequently, we disclose this information as we believe it provides investors with additional information regarding the operational and performance indicators that are most closely assessed by management. The two items adjusted for in our “Core Earnings” presentations are (1) our use of derivative instruments to hedge our economic risks that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment or do qualify for hedge accounting treatment but result in ineffectiveness and (2) the accounting for goodwill and acquired intangible assets. The tables presented below reflect “Core Earnings” operating measures reviewed and utilized by management to manage the business. Reconciliation of the “Core Earnings” segment totals to our consolidated operating results in accordance with GAAP is also included in the tables below.

Our “Core Earnings” performance measures are not defined terms within GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management reporting. The management reporting process measures the performance of the operating segments based on the management structure of the Company and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution. Our operating segments are defined by the products and services they offer or the types of customers they serve, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated by management. Intersegment revenues and expenses are netted within the appropriate financial statement line items consistent with the income statement presentation provided to management. Changes in management structure or allocation methodologies and procedures may result in changes in reported segment financial information.

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.

Segment Reporting (continued)

Segment Results and Reconciliations to GAAP


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending		Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments								Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending		Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾		Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	627	$	—		$	581	$	—		$	—		$	1,208		$	198		$	(76	)	$	122	$	1,330
Other loans		—		—			—		3			—			3			—			—			—		3
Cash and investments		1		1			2		1			(1	)		4			—			—			—		4

Total interest income		628		1			583		4			(1	)		1,215			198			(76	)		122		1,337
Total interest expense		206		—			325		10			(1	)		540			13			—			13		553

Net interest income (loss)		422		1			258		(6	)		—			675			185			(76	)		109		784
Less: provisions for loan losses		187		—			14		—			—			201			—			—			—		201

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		235		1			244		(6	)		—			474			185			(76	)		109		583
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—		—			257		(6	)		—			251			—			—			—		251
Servicing revenue		10		200			16		—			(137	)		89			—			—			—		89
Contingency revenue		—		109			—		—			—			109			—			—			—		109
Gains on debt repurchases		—		—			—		19			—			19			—			—			—		19
Other income		—		8			—		—			—			8			(185	)		219	⁽⁴⁾		34		42

Total other income (loss)		10		317			273		13			(137	)		476			(185	)		219			34		510
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		76		113			144		3			(137	)		199			—			—			—		199
Overhead expenses		—		—			—		59			—			59			—			—			—		59

Operating expenses		76		113			144		62			(137	)		258			—			—			—		258
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			4			4		4
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		2		1			—		21			—			24			—			—			—		24

Total expenses		78		114			144		83			(137	)		282			—			4			4		286

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		167		204			373		(76	)		—			668			—			139			139		807
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		60		74			136		(28	)		—			242			—			58			58		300

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		107		130			237		(48	)		—			426			—			81			81		507
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax expense		—		35			—		—			—			35			—			—			—		35

Net income (loss)		107		165			237		(48	)		—			461			—			81			81		542
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—		(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—		(1	)

Net income (loss) attributable to SLM Corporation	$	107	$	166		$	237	$	(48	)	$	—		$	462		$	—		$	81		$	81	$	543

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting		Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	109	$	—		$	109
Total other income		34		—			34
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—		4			4

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	143	$	(4	)		139

Income tax expense							58

Net income						$	81

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents the $203 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the $16 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.

Segment Reporting (continued)


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments									Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾			Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	616		$	—		$	652	$	—		$	—		$	1,268		$	223		$	(98	)	$	125		$	1,393
Other loans		—			—			—		4			—			4			—			—			—			4
Cash and investments		2			2			3		—			(1	)		6			—			—			—			6

Total interest income		618			2			655		4			(1	)		1,278			223			(98	)		125			1,403
Total interest expense		205			—			409		9			(1	)		622			34			^—			34			656

Net interest income (loss)		413			2			246		(5	)		—			656			189			(98	)		91			747
Less: provisions for loan losses		225			—			18		—			—			243			—			—			—			243

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		188			2			228		(5	)		—			413			189			(98	)		91			504
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Servicing revenue		11			227			22		—			(172	)		88			—			—			—			88
Contingency revenue		—			87			—		—			—			87			—			—			—			87
Gains on debt repurchases		—			—			—		20			—			20			—			—			—			20
Other income (loss)		—			7			—		6			—			13			(189	)		180	⁽⁴⁾		(9	)		4

Total other income (loss)		11			321			22		26			(172	)		208			(189	)		180			(9	)		199
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		63			101			181		4			(172	)		177			—			—			—			177
Overhead expenses		—			—			—		54			—			54			—			—			—			54

Operating expenses		63			101			181		58			(172	)		231			—			—			—			231
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			5			5			5
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		1			2			—		—			—			3			—			—			—			3

Total expenses		64			103			181		58			(172	)		234			—			5			5			239

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		135			220			69		(37	)		—			387			—			77			77			464
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		49			81			25		(14	)		—			141			—			28			28			169

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		86			139			44		(23	)		—			246			—			49			49			295
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit		(1	)		(3	)		—		—			—			(4	)		—			—			—			(4	)

Net income (loss)		85			136			44		(23	)		—			242			—			49			49			291
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—			(1	)

Net income (loss) attributable to SLM Corporation	$	85		$	137		$	44	$	(23	)	$	—		$	243		$	—		$	49		$	49		$	292

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting			Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	91		$	—		$	91
Total other loss		(9	)		—			(9	)
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			5			5

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	82		$	(5	)		77

Income tax expense								28

Net income							$	49

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents the $194 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the ($14) million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.

Segment Reporting (continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments									Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾			Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	1,249		$	—		$	1,181	$	—		$	—		$	2,430		$	410		$	(152	)	$	258		$	2,688
Other loans		—			—			—		6			—			6			—			—			—			6
Cash and investments		4			3			3		—			(2	)		8			—			—			—			8

Total interest income		1,253			3			1,184		6			(2	)		2,444			410			(152	)		258			2,702
Total interest expense		410			—			665		20			(2	)		1,093			31			(1	) ⁽⁴⁾		30			1,123

Net interest income (loss)		843			3			519		(14	)		—			1,351			379			(151	)		228			1,579
Less: provisions for loan losses		412			—			30		—			—			442			—			—			—			442

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		431			3			489		(14	)		—			909			379			(151	)		228			1,137
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—			—			312		(5	)		—			307			—			—			—			307
Servicing revenue		21			405			39		—			(287	)		178			—			—			—			178
Contingency revenue		—			208			—		—			—			208			—			—			—			208
Gains on debt repurchases		—			—			—		48			—			48			(6	)		—			(6	)		42
Other income		—			14			—		1			—			15			(373	)		403	⁽⁵⁾		30			45

Total other income (loss)		21			627			351		44			(287	)		756			(379	)		403			24			780
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		143			222			301		7			(287	)		386			—			—			—			386
Overhead expenses		—			—			—		122			—			122			—			—			—			122

Operating expenses		143			222			301		129			(287	)		508			—			—			—			508
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			7			7			7
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		2			2			—		31			—			35			—			—			—			35

Total expenses		145			224			301		160			(287	)		543			—			7			7			550

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		307			406			539		(130	)		—			1,122			—			245			245			1,367
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		113			149			198		(48	)		—			412			—			100			100			512

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		194			257			341		(82	)		—			710			—			145			145			855
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax expense (benefit)		(1	)		34			—		—			—			33			—			—			—			33

Net income (loss)		193			291			341		(82	)		—			743			—			145			145			888
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—			(1	)

Net income (loss) attributable to SLM Corporation	$	193		$	292		$	341	$	(82	)	$	—		$	744		$	—		$	145		$	145		$	889

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting		Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	228	$	—		$	228
Total other income		24		—			24
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—		7			7

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	252	$	(7	)		245

Income tax expense							100

Net income						$	145

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents a portion of the $44 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

⁽⁵⁾	Represents the $360 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the remaining portion of the $44 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.

Segment Reporting (continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments									Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾			Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	1,241		$	—		$	1,378	$	—		$	—		$	2,619		$	437		$	(196	)	$	241		$	2,860
Other loans		—			—			—		9			—			9			—			—			—			9
Cash and investments		3			4			5		—			(4	)		8			—			—			—			8

Total interest income		1,244			4			1,383		9			(4	)		2,636			437			(196	)		241			2,877
Total interest expense		406			—			832		16			(4	)		1,250			70			2	⁽⁴⁾		72			1,322

Net interest income (loss)		838			4			551		(7	)		—			1,386			367			(198	)		169			1,555
Less: provisions for loan losses		460			—			36		—			—			496			—			—			—			496

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		378			4			515		(7	)		—			890			367			(198	)		169			1,059
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Servicing revenue		23			456			47		—			(348	)		178			—			—			—			178
Contingency revenue		—			176			—		—			—			176			—			—			—			176
Gains on debt repurchases		—			—			—		58			—			58			—			—			—			58
Other income		—			16			—		8			—			24			(367	)		15	⁽⁵⁾		(352	)		(328	)

Total other income (loss)		23			648			47		66			(348	)		436			(367	)		15			(352	)		84
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		131			211			366		6			(348	)		366			—			—			—			366
Overhead expenses		—			—			—		116			—			116			—			—			—			116

Operating expenses		131			211			366		122			(348	)		482			—			—			—			482
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			9			9			9
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		2			2			—		3			—			7			—			—			—			7

Total expenses		133			213			366		125			(348	)		489			—			9			9			498

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		268			439			196		(66	)		—			837			—			(192	)		(192	)		645
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		98			160			72		(25	)		—			305			—			(68	)		(68	)		237

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		170			279			124		(41	)		—			532			—			(124	)		(124	)		408
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit		(1	)		(5	)		—		—			—			(6	)		—			—			—			(6	)

Net income (loss)		169			274			124		(41	)		—			526			—			(124	)		(124	)		402
Less: loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—			(1	)

Net income (loss)	$	169		$	275		$	124	$	(41	)	$	—		$	527		$	—		$	(124	)	$	(124	)	$	403

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting			Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	169		$	—		$	169
Total other loss		(352	)		—			(352	)
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			9			9

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	(183	)	$	(9	)		(192	)

Income tax benefit								(68	)

Net loss							$	(124	)

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents a portion of the $12 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

⁽⁵⁾	Represents the $1 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the remaining portion of the $12 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

SLM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.

Segment Reporting (continued)

Summary of “Core Earnings” Adjustments to GAAP

The two adjustments required to reconcile from our “Core Earnings” results to our GAAP results of operations relate to differing treatments for: (1) our use of derivative instruments to hedge our economic risks that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment or do qualify for hedge accounting treatment but result in ineffectiveness and (2) the accounting for goodwill and acquired intangible assets. The following table reflects aggregate adjustments associated with these areas.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:
Net impact of derivative accounting ⁽¹⁾	$	143		$	82		$	252		$	(183	)
Net impact of goodwill and acquired intangibles assets ⁽²⁾		(4	)		(5	)		(7	)		(9	)
Net tax effect ⁽³⁾		(58	)		(28	)		(100	)		68

Total “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	81		$	49		$	145		$	(124	)

⁽¹⁾

Derivative accounting: “Core Earnings” exclude periodic unrealized gains and losses that are caused by the mark-to-market valuations on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under GAAP as well as the periodic unrealized gains and losses that are a result of ineffectiveness recognized related to effective hedges under GAAP. These unrealized gains and losses occur in our Consumer Lending, FFELP Loans and Other business segments. Under GAAP, for our derivatives that are held to maturity, the cumulative net unrealized gain or loss over the life of the contract will equal $0 except for Floor Income Contracts where the cumulative unrealized gain will equal the amount for which we sold the contract. In our “Core Earnings” presentation, we recognize the economic effect of these hedges, which generally results in any net settlement cash paid or received being recognized ratably as an interest expense or revenue over the hedged item’s life.

⁽²⁾

Goodwill and acquired intangible assets: Our “Core Earnings” exclude goodwill and intangible asset impairment and amortization of acquired intangible assets.

⁽³⁾

Net tax effect: Such tax effect is based upon our “Core Earnings” effective tax rate for the year.

11.

Discontinued Operations

In the second quarter of 2013, we sold our Campus Solutions business and recorded an after-tax gain of $38 million. This business provided processing capabilities to educational institutions. The Campus Solutions business comprises operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished operationally and for financial reporting purposes from the rest of the Company and we will have no continuing involvement. As a result, our Campus Solutions business is presented in discontinued operations for the current and prior periods.

The following table summarizes the discontinued operations.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes	$	29		$	(5	)	$	26		$	(9	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(6	)		(1	)		(7	)		(3	)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	35		$	(4	)	$	33		$	(6	)

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the 2012 Form 10-K.

This report contains “forward-looking” statements and information based on management’s current expectations as of the date of this document. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs, opinions, or expectations and statements that assume or are dependent upon future events, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks and uncertainties set forth in Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our 2012 Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); increases in financing costs; limits on liquidity; increases in costs associated with compliance with laws and regulations; changes in accounting standards and the impact of related changes in significant accounting estimates; any adverse outcomes in any significant litigation to which we are a party; credit risk associated with our exposure to third parties, including counterparties to our derivative transactions; and changes in the terms of student loans and the educational credit marketplace (including changes resulting from new laws and the implementation of existing laws). We could also be affected by, among other things: changes in our funding costs and availability; reductions to our credit ratings or the credit ratings of the United States of America; failures of our operating systems or infrastructure, including those of third-party vendors; damage to our reputation; failures to successfully implement cost-cutting initiatives and adverse effects of such initiatives on our business; risks associated with restructuring initiatives, including our recently announced strategic plan to separate our existing operations into two separate publically traded companies; changes in the demand for educational financing or in financing preferences of lenders, educational institutions, students and their families; changes in law and regulations with respect to the student lending business and financial institutions generally; increased competition from banks and other consumer lenders; the creditworthiness of our customers; changes in the general interest rate environment, including the rate relationships among relevant money-market instruments and those of our earning assets versus our funding arrangements; changes in general economic conditions; our ability to successfully effectuate any acquisitions and other strategic initiatives; and changes in the demand for debt management services. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements also requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions including estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates or assumptions may prove to be incorrect. All forward-looking statements contained in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements and are made only as of the date of this document. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to conform the statement to actual results or changes in our expectations.

Definitions for certain capitalized terms used in this document can be found in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Through this discussion and analysis, we intend to provide the reader with some narrative context for how our management views our consolidated financial statements, additional context within which to assess our operating results, and information on the quality and variability of our earnings, liquidity and cash flows.

Selected Financial Information and Ratios


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions, except per share data)	2013			2012			2013			2012
GAAP Basis
Net income attributable to SLM Corporation	$	543		$	292		$	889		$	403
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to SLM Corporation	$	1.20		$	.59		$	1.94		$	.79
Weighted average shares used to compute diluted earnings per share		448			488			453			499
Return on assets		1.35	%		.64	%		1.08	%		.44	%

“Core Earnings” Basis ⁽¹⁾
“Core Earnings” attributable to SLM Corporation	$	462		$	243		$	744		$	527
“Core Earnings” diluted earnings per common share attributable to SLM Corporation	$	1.02		$	.49		$	1.62		$	1.03
Weighted average shares used to compute diluted earnings per share		448			488			453			499
“Core Earnings” return on assets		1.15	%		.53	%		0.90	%		.58	%

Other Operating Statistics
Ending FFELP Loans, net	$	108,491		$	132,833		$	108,491		$	132,833
Ending Private Education Loans, net		37,116			36,454			37,116			36,454

Ending total student loans, net	$	145,607		$	169,287		$	145,607		$	169,287

Average student loans	$	152,135		$	172,436		$	156,175		$	173,689

⁽¹⁾

“Core Earnings” are non-GAAP financial measures and do not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. For a greater explanation of “Core Earnings,” see the section titled “‘Core Earnings’ — Definition and Limitations” and subsequent sections.

Overview

Our primary business is to originate, service and collect loans we make to students and their families to finance the cost of education. The core of our marketing strategy is to generate student loan originations by promoting our products on campus through the financial aid office and through direct marketing to students and their families. We also provide servicing, loan default aversion and defaulted loan collection services for loans owned by other institutions, including ED, as well as 529 college-savings plan program management services and a consumer savings network.

In addition we are the largest holder, servicer and collector of loans made under FFELP, a program that was discontinued in 2010.

We monitor and assess our ongoing operations and results based on the following four reportable segments:

(1) Consumer Lending, (2) Business Services, (3) FFELP Loans and (4) Other.

Consumer Lending Segment

Business Services Segment

FFELP Loans Segment

Other

Recent Developments

Strategic Plan to Create Separate Education Loan Management and Consumer Banking Companies

On May 29, 2013, our Board of Directors authorized a plan to pursue the separation of the Company’s existing businesses into two, separate, publicly traded entities—an education loan management business and a consumer banking business.

The separation transaction will be effected as a pro-rata dividend of shares of the education loan management business to our shareholders. Upon consummation of the separation, the education loan management business will become a separate public company and will trade under a new stock ticker symbol. The consumer banking business will retain the stock ticker symbol “SLM” and will operate under the Sallie Mae brand.

The completion of the separation will be subject to certain customary conditions, including final approval by the Company’s Board of Directors, confirmation of the tax-free nature of the separation transaction and the effectiveness of a registration statement that will be filed with the SEC. The contemplated separation and distribution will not require a shareholder vote. Subject to the satisfaction of all necessary conditions, including the conditions described above, the separation is currently anticipated to occur in the first half of 2014; however, there can be no assurance that the separation and distribution will ultimately occur.

At the time of this filing, the Bank remains subject to a cease and desist order originally issued in August 2008 by the FDIC and the UDFI. In July 2013, the FDIC notified the Bank that it plans to replace the existing cease and desist order with a new formal enforcement action that will more specifically address certain cited violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, including with respect to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and its implementing regulation, Regulation B, which could include civil money penalties and restitution obligations. The Bank has not been notified by the UDFI that it intends to join the FDIC in issuing the new enforcement action. We have made and continue to make changes to the Bank’s oversight of significant activities performed outside the Bank by Company affiliates, including in connection with our pursuit of a strategic plan to separate our existing organization into two publicly traded companies. We could be required to, or otherwise determine to, make further changes to the business practices and products of the Bank and our other affiliates to respond to regulatory concerns.

CFPB Oversight of Nonbank Student Loan Servicers

Many aspects of our businesses are subject to federal and state regulation and administrative oversight, including by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”). We expect the CFPB and other regulatory agencies will continue proposing new or additional regulatory requirements or oversight over our various businesses (most notably, private student lending and servicing, default aversion and debt collection), or, generally to large nonbank financial services companies. Additional information on supervision and regulation of our businesses can be found in Item 1, “Business — Supervision and Regulation” in our 2012 Form 10-K.

On March 14, 2013, the CFPB proposed a new rule allowing the CFPB to federally supervise certain nonbank student loan servicers for the first time. As proposed, the CFPB will have supervisory authority over any nonbank student loan servicer that services more than one million borrower accounts, including accounts for both Private Education Loans and federal student loans. We would be subject to this new oversight. Under the proposal, the CFPB’s supervision would include gathering reports, conducting examinations for compliance with federal consumer financial laws and taking enforcement actions as appropriate, similar to the CFPB’s current supervisory authority over large bank student loan servicers. The CFPB expects to issue a final rule by the end of this year.

Key Financial Measures

Our operating results are primarily driven by net interest income from our student loan portfolios (which include financing costs), provision for loan losses, the revenues and expenses generated by our service businesses, and gains and losses on loan sales and debt repurchases. We manage and assess the performance of each business segment separately as each is focused on different customers and each derives its revenue from different activities and services. A brief summary of our key financial measures (net interest income; provisions for loan losses; charge-offs and delinquencies; servicing and contingency revenues; other income (loss); operating expenses; and “Core Earnings”) can be found in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2012 Form 10-K.

Second-Quarter 2013 Summary of Results

We report financial results on a GAAP basis and also present certain “Core Earnings” performance measures. Our management, equity investors, credit rating agencies and debt capital providers use these “Core Earnings” measures to monitor our business performance. See “‘Core Earnings’ — Definition and Limitations” for a further discussion and a complete reconciliation between GAAP net income and “Core Earnings.”

Second-quarter 2013 GAAP net income was $543 million ($1.20 diluted earnings per share), versus net income of $292 million ($0.59 diluted earnings per share) in the second-quarter 2012. The changes in GAAP net income are driven by the same types of “Core Earnings” items discussed below as well as changes in “mark-to-market” unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts and amortization and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets that are recognized in GAAP but not in “Core Earnings” results. Second-quarter 2013 results included $143 million of gains from derivative accounting treatment that is excluded from “Core Earnings” results. In the year-ago period, these amounts were gains of $82 million.

“Core Earnings” for the quarter were $462 million ($1.02 diluted earnings per share), compared with $243 million ($0.49 diluted earnings per share) in the year-ago period. The second-quarter 2013 “Core Earnings” diluted earnings per share increase includes a $257 million gain from the sale of residual interests in FFELP Loan

securitization trusts, a $38 million after-tax gain from the sale of our Campus Solutions business, a $42 million decline in the provision for loan losses, and an increase in net interest income before provision for loan losses of $19 million which more than offset higher operating expenses of $27 million and higher restructuring and other reorganization expenses of $21 million.

During the first six months of 2013, we:

•

issued $3.7 billion of FFELP asset-backed securities (“ABS”), $2.5 billion of Private Education Loan ABS and $1.5 billion of unsecured bonds;

•

closed on a new $6.8 billion credit facility that matures in June 2014, to facilitate the term securitization of FFELP Loans;

•

repurchased $997 million of debt and realized “Core Earnings” gains of $48 million, compared with $290 million of debt repurchased and $58 million of gains in the first six months of 2012;

•

repurchased 19 million common shares for $400 million on the open market, fully utilizing our February 2013 share repurchase program authorization; and

•

sold Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts to third parties. We will continue to service the student loans in the trusts under existing agreements. The sales removed securitization trust assets of $12.5 billion and related liabilities of $12.1 billion from our balance sheet.

2013 Management Objectives

In 2013 we have set out five major goals to create shareholder value. They are: (1) prudently grow Consumer Lending segment assets and revenues; (2) maximize cash flows from FFELP Loans; (3) reduce operating expenses while improving efficiency and customer experience; (4) maintain our financial strength; and (5) expand the capabilities of the Bank. Here is how we plan to achieve these objectives and the progress we have made to date:

Prudently Grow Consumer Lending Segment Assets and Revenues

We will continue to pursue managed growth in our Private Education Loan portfolio in 2013 by leveraging our Sallie Mae and Upromise brand while sustaining the credit quality of, and percentage of cosigners for, new originations. We are currently targeting at least $4 billion in new loan originations for 2013, compared with $3.3 billion in 2012. We will also continue to help our customers manage their borrowings and succeed in its payoff, which we expect will result in lower charge-offs and provision for loan losses. Originations were 15 percent higher in the second quarter of 2013 compared with the year-ago quarter. Charge-offs were 2.7 percent in the current quarter, down from 3.1 percent in the year-ago quarter. Provision for Private Education Loan losses decreased $38 million from the year-ago quarter. Our delinquency and charge-off rates in the second-quarter of 2013 were the lowest since 2008.

Maximize Cash Flows from FFELP Loans

In 2013, we will continue to purchase additional FFELP Loan portfolios. Through June 30, 2013, we sold our ownership interest in five of our FFELP Loan securitization trusts ($12.5 billion of securitization trust assets and $12.1 billion of related liabilities). We will continue to explore alternative transactions and structures that can increase our ability to maximize the value of our ownership interests in these trusts and allow us to diversify our holdings while maintaining servicing fee income. We must also continue to reduce operating and overhead costs attributable to the maintenance and management of this segment. During the first half of 2013, we purchased $285 million of FFELP Loans.

Reduce Operating Expenses While Improving Efficiency and Customer Experience

For 2013, we will reduce unit costs, and balance our Private Education Loan growth and the challenge of increased regulatory oversight. We also plan to improve efficiency and customer experience by replacing certain of our legacy systems and making enhancements to our self-service platform and call centers (including improved call segmentation that routes an in-bound customer call directly to the appropriate agent who can answer the customer’s inquiry). Second-quarter 2013 operating expenses were $258 million compared with $231 million in the year-ago quarter. The increase is primarily the result of increases in our third-party servicing and collections activities, increased Private Education Loan marketing activities, as well as continued investments in technology.

Maintain Our Financial Strength

In February 2013, we announced an increase in our quarterly common stock dividend to $0.15 per share and a new $400 million common share repurchase program. It is management’s objective for 2013 to provide these shareholder distributions while ending 2013 with capital and reserve positions as strong as those with which we ended 2012. We repurchased 9 million shares of common stock for $201 million in the second quarter of 2013, or an aggregate of 19 million shares for $400 million in the first half of 2013, fully utilizing our February 2013 share repurchase program authorization. On July 16, 2013, we authorized $400 million to be utilized in a new common share repurchase program that does not have an expiration date. Additionally, on June 10, 2013, we closed on a new $6.8 billion credit facility that matures in June 2014, to facilitate the term securitization of FFELP Loans. The facility was used in June 2013 to refinance all of the FFELP Loans previously financed through the ED Conduit Program. As a result, we ended our participation in the ED Conduit Program prior to the January 19, 2014 maturity date. On July 17, 2013, we closed on a $1.1 billion ABCP borrowing facility that matures on August 15, 2015. The facility will be used to fund the call and redemption of our SLM 2009-D Private Education Loan Trust ABS, anticipated to occur on August 15, 2013.

Expand Bank Capabilities

The Bank continues to fund our Private Education Loan originations in 2013. We are continuing to evolve the operational and enterprise risk oversight program at the Bank in preparation for expected growth and designation as a “large bank,” which will entail enhanced regulatory scrutiny. In addition, we plan to voluntarily make similar changes at SLM Corporation. See the 2012 10-K, Item 1 “Business — Supervision and Regulation — Regulatory Outlook — Evolving Regulation of the Bank” for additional information about the Bank’s regulatory environment once it becomes a “large bank.”

Results of Operations

We present the results of operations below first on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP. Following our discussion of consolidated earnings results on a GAAP basis, we present our results on a segment basis. We have four business segments: FFELP Loans, Consumer Lending, Business Services and Other. Since these segments operate in distinct business environments and we manage and evaluate the financial performance of these segments using non-GAAP financial measures, these segments are presented on a “Core Earnings” basis (see “‘Core Earnings’ — Definition and Limitations”).

GAAP Statements of Income (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)						Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
(In millions, except per share data)	2013			2012			$			%			2013			2012			$			%
Interest income:
FFELP Loans	$	703		$	777		$	(74	)		(10	)%	$	1,439		$	1,619		$	(180	)		(11	)%
Private Education Loans		627			616			11			2			1,249			1,241			8			1
Other loans		3			4			(1	)		(25	)		6			9			(3	)		(33	)
Cash and investments		4			6			(2	)		(33	)		8			8			—			—

Total interest income		1,337			1,403			(66	)		(5	)		2,702			2,877			(175	)		(6	)
Total interest expense		553			656			(103	)		(16	)		1,123			1,322			(199	)		(15	)

Net interest income		784			747			37			5			1,579			1,555			24			2
Less: provisions for loan losses		201			243			(42	)		(17	)		442			496			(54	)		(11	)

Net interest income after provisions for loan losses		583			504			79			16			1,137			1,059			78			7
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		251			—			251			100			307			—			307			100
Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net		18			6			12			200			(13	)		(366	)		353			(96	)
Servicing revenue		89			88			1			1			178			178			—			—
Contingency revenue		109			87			22			25			208			176			32			18
Gains on debt repurchases		19			20			(1	)		(5	)		42			58			(16	)		(28	)
Other income (loss)		24			(2	)		26			1,300			58			38			20			53

Total other income		510			199			311			156			780			84			696			829
Expenses:
Operating expenses		258			231			27			12			508			482			26			5
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization expense		4			5			(1	)		(20	)		7			9			(2	)		(22	)
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		24			3			21			700			35			7			28			400

Total expenses		286			239			47			20			550			498			52			10

Income from continuing operations, before income tax expense		807			464			343			74			1,367			645			722			112
Income tax expense		300			169			131			78			512			237			275			116

Net income from continuing operations		507			295			212			72			855			408			447			110
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax expense (benefit)		35			(4	)		39			975			33			(6	)		39			650

Net income		542			291			251			86			888			402			486			121
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1	)		(1	)		—			—			(1	)		(1	)		—			—

Net income attributable to SLM Corporation		543			292			251			86			889			403			486			121
Preferred stock dividends		5			5			—			—			10			10			—			—

Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock	$	538		$	287		$	251			87	%	$	879		$	393		$	486			124	%

Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to SLM Corporation:
Continuing operations	$	1.14		$	.60		$	.54			90	%	$	1.90		$	.81		$	1.09			135	%
Discontinued operations		.08			(.01	)		.09			900			.07			(.01	)		.08			800

Total	$	1.22		$	.59		$	.63			107	%	$	1.97		$	.80		$	1.17			146	%

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to SLM Corporation:
Continuing operations	$	1.12		$	.60		$	.52			87	%	$	1.87		$	.80		$	1.07			134	%
Discontinued operations		.08			(.01	)		.09			900			.07			(.01	)		.08			800

Total	$	1.20		$	.59		$	.61			103	%	$	1.94		$	.79		$	1.15			146	%

Dividends per common share attributable to SLM Corporation	$	.15		$	.125		$	.025			20	%	$	.30		$	.25		$	.05			20	%

Consolidated Earnings Summary — GAAP-basis

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, net income was $543 million, or $1.20 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $292 million, or $0.59 diluted earnings per common share, for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in net income was primarily due to a $251 million increase in gains on sales of loans and investments, a $39 million after-tax increase in income from discontinued operations, a $42 million decline in the provision for loan losses, and a $37 million increase in net interest income, which more than offset higher operating expenses of $27 million and higher restructuring and other reorganization expenses of $21 million.

The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of changes in net income for the current quarter compared with the year-ago quarter are as follows:

•

Net interest income increased by $37 million in the current quarter compared with the prior-year quarter primarily due to a $50 million acceleration of non-cash premium expense recorded in second-quarter 2012 related to ED’s consolidation of $5.2 billion of loans under the Special Direct Consolidation Loan initiative (“SDCL”) that ended June 30, 2012. Partially offsetting this increase was a reduction in net interest income from a $20.9 billion decline in average FFELP Loans outstanding.

•

Provisions for loan losses declined $42 million compared with the year-ago quarter primarily as a result of the overall improvement in Private Education Loans’ credit quality, delinquency and charge-off trends leading to decreases in expected future charge-offs.

•

Gains on sales of loans and investments increased by $251 million as a result of $257 million in gains from sales of Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts that occurred in second-quarter 2013. See “Business Segment Earnings Summary—‘Core Earnings’ Basis—FFELP Loans Segment” for further discussion.

•

Contingency revenue increased $22 million primarily from an increase in collection volumes in second-quarter 2013 compared with the prior-year quarter.

•

Other income increased $26 million primarily from an increase in foreign currency translation gains. The foreign currency translation gains relate to a portion of our foreign currency denominated debt that does not receive hedge accounting treatment. These gains were partially offset by losses on derivative and hedging activities related to the derivatives used to economically hedge these debt investments.

•

Second-quarter 2013 operating expenses were $258 million compared with $231 million in the year-ago quarter. The increase in operating expenses is primarily the result of increases in our third-party servicing and collections activities, increased Private Education Loan marketing, as well as continued investments in technology.

•

Restructuring and other reorganization expenses were $24 million compared with $3 million in the year-ago quarter. For 2013, these consisted of $14 million related to severance and $10 million related to the Company’s previously announced plan to separate its existing organization into two publicly-traded companies. The $3 million in 2012 relates to restructuring expenses.

•

Income from discontinued operations increased $39 million primarily as a result of the sale of our Campus Solutions business in the second quarter of 2013 which resulted in a $38 million after-tax gain. See “Business Segment Earnings Summary—‘Core Earnings’ Basis—Business Services Segment” for additional discussion.

In addition, we repurchased 9 million shares of our common stock for $201 million during the second-quarter 2013 as part of a common share repurchase program. Primarily as a result of ongoing common share repurchases, our average outstanding diluted shares decreased by 40 million shares from the year-ago quarter.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net income was $889 million, or $1.94 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $403 million, or $0.79 diluted earnings per common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in net income was primarily due to a $353 million decrease in net losses on derivative and hedging activities, a $307 million increase in net gains on sales of loans and investments, a $39 million after-tax increase in income from discontinued operations and a $54 million decrease in provisions for loan losses, which were partially offset by higher operating expenses of $26 million and higher restructuring and other reorganization expenses of $28 million.

The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of changes in net income for the current six-month period compared with the year-ago six-month period are as follows:

•

Net interest income increased by $24 million primarily due to a $50 million acceleration of non-cash premium expense recorded in the first half of 2012 related to ED’s consolidation of $5.2 billion of loans under the SDCL initiative that ended June 30, 2012. Partially offsetting this increase was an $18.1 billion decline in average FFELP Loans outstanding.

•

Provisions for loan losses declined $54 million compared with the year-ago period primarily as a result of the overall improvement in Private Education Loans’ credit quality, delinquency and charge-off trends leading to decreases in expected future charge-offs.

•

Gains on sales of loans and investments increased by $307 million as a result of $312 million in gains on the sales of the Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts. See “Business Segment Earnings Summary—‘Core Earnings’ Basis—FFELP Loans Segment” for further discussion.

•

Losses on derivative and hedging activities, net, resulted in a net loss of $13 million in the current six-month period compared with a net loss of $366 million in the year-ago period. The primary factors affecting the change were interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations, which primarily affected the valuations of our Floor Income Contracts, basis swaps and foreign currency hedges during each period. Valuations of derivative instruments vary based upon many factors including changes in interest rates, credit risk, foreign currency fluctuations and other market factors. As a result, net gains and losses on derivative and hedging activities may continue to vary significantly in future periods.

•

Contingency revenue increased $32 million primarily from an increase in collection volumes in the first half of 2013 compared with the prior-year period.

•

First-half 2013 operating expenses were $508 million compared with $482 million in the first half of 2012. The increase in operating expenses is primarily the result of increases in our third-party servicing and collections activities, increased Private Education Loan marketing, as well as continued investments in technology.

•

Restructuring and other reorganization expenses were $35 million compared with $7 million in the year-ago period. For 2013, these consisted of $23 million related to severance and $12 million related to the Company’s previously announced plan to separate its existing organization into two publicly-traded companies. The $7 million in 2012 relates to restructuring expenses.

•

Income from discontinued operations increased $39 million primarily as a result of the sale of our Campus Solutions business in the second quarter of 2013. See “Business Segment Earnings Summary—‘Core Earnings’ Basis—Business Services Segment” for additional discussion.

In addition, we repurchased 19 million shares of our common stock for $400 million during the first half of 2013 as part of a common share repurchase program. Primarily as a result of ongoing common share repurchases, our average outstanding diluted shares decreased by 46 million shares from the year-ago period.

“Core Earnings” — Definition and Limitations

We prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. However, we also evaluate our business segments on a basis that differs from GAAP. We refer to this different basis of presentation as “Core Earnings.” We provide this “Core Earnings” basis of presentation on a consolidated basis for each business segment because this is what we review internally when making management decisions regarding our performance and how we allocate resources. We also refer to this information in our presentations with credit rating agencies, lenders and investors. Because our “Core Earnings” basis of presentation corresponds to our segment financial presentations, we are required by GAAP to provide “Core Earnings” disclosure in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for our business segments. For additional information, see “Note 10 — Segment Reporting.”

“Core Earnings” are not a substitute for reported results under GAAP. We use “Core Earnings” to manage each business segment because “Core Earnings” reflect adjustments to GAAP financial results for two items, discussed below, that create significant volatility mostly due to timing factors generally beyond the control of management. Accordingly, we believe that “Core Earnings” provide management with a useful basis from which to better evaluate results from ongoing operations against the business plan or against results from prior periods. Consequently, we disclose this information as we believe it provides investors with additional information regarding the operational and performance indicators that are most closely assessed by management. The two items for which we adjust our “Core Earnings” presentations are (1) our use of derivative instruments to hedge our economic risks that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment or do qualify for hedge accounting treatment but result in ineffectiveness and (2) the accounting for goodwill and acquired intangible assets.

While GAAP provides a uniform, comprehensive basis of accounting, for the reasons described above, our “Core Earnings” basis of presentation does not. “Core Earnings” are subject to certain general and specific limitations that investors should carefully consider. For example, there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management reporting. Our “Core Earnings” are not defined terms within GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Accordingly, our “Core Earnings” presentation does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. Investors, therefore, may not be able to compare our performance with that of other financial services companies based upon “Core Earnings.” “Core Earnings” results are only meant to supplement GAAP results by providing additional information regarding the operational and performance indicators that are most closely used by management, our board of directors, rating agencies, lenders and investors to assess performance.

Specific adjustments that management makes to GAAP results to derive our “Core Earnings” basis of presentation are described in detail in the section titled “‘Core Earnings’ — Definition and Limitations — Differences between ‘Core Earnings’ and GAAP” of this Item 2.

The following tables show “Core Earnings” for each business segment and our business as a whole along with the adjustments made to the income/expense items to reconcile the amounts to our reported GAAP results as required by GAAP and reported in “Note 10 — Segment Reporting.”


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending		Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments								Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending		Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾		Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	627	$	—		$	581	$	—		$	—		$	1,208		$	198		$	(76	)	$	122	$	1,330
Other loans		—		—			—		3			—			3			—			—			—		3
Cash and investments		1		1			2		1			(1	)		4			—			—			—		4

Total interest income		628		1			583		4			(1	)		1,215			198			(76	)		122		1,337
Total interest expense		206		—			325		10			(1	)		540			13			—			13		553

Net interest income (loss)		422		1			258		(6	)		—			675			185			(76	)		109		784
Less: provisions for loan losses		187		—			14		—			—			201			—			—			—		201

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		235		1			244		(6	)		—			474			185			(76	)		109		583
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—		—			257		(6	)		—			251			—			—			—		251
Servicing revenue		10		200			16		—			(137	)		89			—			—			—		89
Contingency revenue		—		109			—		—			—			109			—			—			—		109
Gains on debt repurchases		—		—			—		19			—			19			—			—			—		19
Other income		—		8			—		—			—			8			(185	)		219	⁽⁴⁾		34		42

Total other income (loss)		10		317			273		13			(137	)		476			(185	)		219			34		510
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		76		113			144		3			(137	)		199			—			—			—		199
Overhead expenses		—		—			—		59			—			59			—			—			—		59

Operating expenses		76		113			144		62			(137	)		258			—			—			—		258
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			4			4		4
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		2		1			—		21			—			24			—			—			—		24

Total expenses		78		114			144		83			(137	)		282			—			4			4		286

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		167		204			373		(76	)		—			668			—			139			139		807
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		60		74			136		(28	)		—			242			—			58			58		300

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		107		130			237		(48	)		—			426			—			81			81		507
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax expense		—		35			—		—			—			35			—			—			—		35

Net income (loss)		107		165			237		(48	)		—			461			—			81			81		542
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—		(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—		(1	)

Net income (loss) attributable to SLM Corporation	$	107	$	166		$	237	$	(48	)	$	—		$	462		$	—		$	81		$	81	$	543

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting		Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	109	$	—		$	109
Total other income		34		—			34
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—		4			4

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	143	$	(4	)		139

Income tax expense							58

Net income						$	81

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents the $203 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the $16 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments									Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾			Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	616		$	—		$	652	$	—		$	—		$	1,268		$	223		$	(98	)	$	125		$	1,393
Other loans		—			—			—		4			—			4			—			—			—			4
Cash and investments		2			2			3		—			(1	)		6			—			—			—			6

Total interest income		618			2			655		4			(1	)		1,278			223			(98	)		125			1,403
Total interest expense		205			—			409		9			(1	)		622			34			^—			34			656

Net interest income (loss)		413			2			246		(5	)		—			656			189			(98	)		91			747
Less: provisions for loan losses		225			—			18		—			—			243			—			—			—			243

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		188			2			228		(5	)		—			413			189			(98	)		91			504
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Servicing revenue		11			227			22		—			(172	)		88			—			—			—			88
Contingency revenue		—			87			—		—			—			87			—			—			—			87
Gains on debt repurchases		—			—			—		20			—			20			—			—			—			20
Other income		—			7			—		6			—			13			(189	)		180	⁽⁴⁾		(9	)		4

Total other income (loss)		11			321			22		26			(172	)		208			(189	)		180			(9	)		199
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		63			101			181		4			(172	)		177			—			—			—			177
Overhead expenses		—			—			—		54			—			54			—			—			—			54

Operating expenses		63			101			181		58			(172	)		231			—			—			—			231
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			5			5			5
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		1			2			—		—			—			3			—			—			—			3

Total expenses		64			103			181		58			(172	)		234			—			5			5			239

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		135			220			69		(37	)		—			387			—			77			77			464
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		49			81			25		(14	)		—			141			—			28			28			169

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		86			139			44		(23	)		—			246			—			49			49			295
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit		(1	)		(3	)		—		—			—			(4	)		—			—			—			(4	)

Net income (loss)		85			136			44		(23	)		—			242			—			49			49			291
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—			(1	)

Net income (loss) attributable to SLM Corporation	$	85		$	137		$	44	$	(23	)	$	—		$	243		$	—		$	49		$	49		$	292

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting			Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	91		$	—		$	91
Total other loss		(9	)		—			(9	)
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			5			5

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	82		$	(5	)		77

Income tax expense								28

Net income							$	49

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents the $194 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the ($14) million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments									Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾			Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	1,249		$	—		$	1,181	$	—		$	—		$	2,430		$	410		$	(152	)	$	258		$	2,688
Other loans		—			—			—		6			—			6			—			—			—			6
Cash and investments		4			3			3		—			(2	)		8			—			—			—			8

Total interest income		1,253			3			1,184		6			(2	)		2,444			410			(152	)		258			2,702
Total interest expense		410			—			665		20			(2	)		1,093			31			(1	) ⁽⁴⁾		30			1,123

Net interest income (loss)		843			3			519		(14	)		—			1,351			379			(151	)		228			1,579
Less: provisions for loan losses		412			—			30		—			—			442			—			—			—			442

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		431			3			489		(14	)		—			909			379			(151	)		228			1,137
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—			—			312		(5	)		—			307			—			—			—			307
Servicing revenue		21			405			39		—			(287	)		178			—			—			—			178
Contingency revenue		—			208			—		—			—			208			—			—			—			208
Gains on debt repurchases		—			—			—		48			—			48			(6	)		—			(6	)		42
Other income		—			14			—		1			—			15			(373	)		403	⁽⁵⁾		30			45

Total other income (loss)		21			627			351		44			(287	)		756			(379	)		403			24			780
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		143			222			301		7			(287	)		386			—			—			—			386
Overhead expenses		—			—			—		122			—			122			—			—			—			122

Operating expenses		143			222			301		129			(287	)		508			—			—			—			508
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			7			7			7
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		2			2			—		31			—			35			—			—			—			35

Total expenses		145			224			301		160			(287	)		543			—			7			7			550

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		307			406			539		(130	)		—			1,122			—			245			245			1,367
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		113			149			198		(48	)		—			412			—			100			100			512

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		194			257			341		(82	)		—			710			—			145			145			855
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax expense (benefit)		(1	)		34			—		—			—			33			—			—			—			33

Net income (loss)		193			291			341		(82	)		—			743			—			145			145			888
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—			(1	)

Net income (loss) attributable to SLM Corporation	$	193		$	292		$	341	$	(82	)	$	—		$	744		$	—		$	145		$	145		$	889

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting		Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	228	$	—		$	228
Total other income		24		—			24
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—		7			7

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	252	$	(7	)		245

Income tax expense							100

Net income						$	145

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents a portion of the $44 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

⁽⁵⁾	Represents the $360 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the remaining portion of the $44 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Adjustments									Total GAAP
(Dollars in millions)	Consumer Lending			Business Services			FFELP Loans		Other			Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Total “Core Earnings”			Reclassifications			Additions/ (Subtractions)			Total Adjustments ⁽²⁾			Total GAAP
Interest income:
Student loans	$	1,241		$	—		$	1,378	$	—		$	—		$	2,619		$	437		$	(196	)	$	241		$	2,860
Other loans		—			—			—		9			—			9			—			—			—			9
Cash and investments		3			4			5		—			(4	)		8			—			—			—			8

Total interest income		1,244			4			1,383		9			(4	)		2,636			437			(196	)		241			2,877
Total interest expense		406			—			832		16			(4	)		1,250			70			2	⁽⁴⁾		72			1,322

Net interest income (loss)		838			4			551		(7	)		—			1,386			367			(198	)		169			1,555
Less: provisions for loan losses		460			—			36		—			—			496			—			—			—			496

Net interest income (loss) after provisions for loan losses		378			4			515		(7	)		—			890			367			(198	)		169			1,059
Other income (loss):
Gains on sales of loans and investments		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Servicing revenue		23			456			47		—			(348	)		178			—			—			—			178
Contingency revenue		—			176			—		—			—			176			—			—			—			176
Gains on debt repurchases		—			—			—		58			—			58			—			—			—			58
Other income		—			16			—		8			—			24			(367	)		15	⁽⁵⁾		(352	)		(328	)

Total other income (loss)		23			648			47		66			(348	)		436			(367	)		15			(352	)		84
Expenses:
Direct operating expenses		131			211			366		6			(348	)		366			—			—			—			366
Overhead expenses		—			—			—		116			—			116			—			—			—			116

Operating expenses		131			211			366		122			(348	)		482			—			—			—			482
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			9			9			9
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		2			2			—		3			—			7			—			—			—			7

Total expenses		133			213			366		125			(348	)		489			—			9			9			498

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income tax expense (benefit)		268			439			196		(66	)		—			837			—			(192	)		(192	)		645
Income tax expense (benefit) ⁽³⁾		98			160			72		(25	)		—			305			—			(68	)		(68	)		237

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		170			279			124		(41	)		—			532			—			(124	)		(124	)		408
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit		(1	)		(5	)		—		—			—			(6	)		—			—			—			(6	)

Net income (loss)		169			274			124		(41	)		—			526			—			(124	)		(124	)		402
Less: loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			(1	)		—		—			—			(1	)		—			—			—			(1	)

Net income (loss)	$	169		$	275		$	124	$	(41	)	$	—		$	527		$	—		$	(124	)	$	(124	)	$	403

⁽¹⁾	The eliminations in servicing revenue and direct operating expense represent the elimination of intercompany servicing revenue where the Business Services segment performs the loan servicing function for the FFELP Loans segment.

⁽²⁾	“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Net Impact of Derivative Accounting			Net Impact of Goodwill and Acquired Intangibles			Total
Net interest income after provisions for loan losses	$	169		$	—		$	169
Total other loss		(352	)		—			(352	)
Goodwill and acquired intangible asset impairment and amortization		—			9			9

“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	(183	)	$	(9	)		(192	)

Income tax benefit								(68	)

Net loss							$	(124	)

⁽³⁾	Income taxes are based on a percentage of net income before tax for the individual reportable segment.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents a portion of the $12 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

⁽⁵⁾	Represents the $1 million of “unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” as well as the remaining portion of the $12 million of “other derivative accounting adjustments.”

Differences between “Core Earnings” and GAAP


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
“Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP:
Net impact of derivative accounting	$	143		$	82		$	252		$	(183	)
Net impact of goodwill and acquired intangible assets		(4	)		(5	)		(7	)		(9	)
Net income tax effect		(58	)		(28	)		(100	)		68

Total “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP	$	81		$	49		$	145		$	(124	)

1) Derivative Accounting: “Core Earnings” exclude periodic unrealized gains and losses that are caused by the mark-to-market valuations on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under GAAP as well as the periodic unrealized gains and losses that are a result of ineffectiveness recognized related to effective hedges under GAAP. These unrealized gains and losses occur in our Consumer Lending, FFELP Loans and Other business segments. Under GAAP, for our derivatives that are held to maturity, the cumulative net unrealized gain or loss over the life of the contract will equal $0 except for Floor Income Contracts where the cumulative unrealized gain will equal the amount for which we sold the contract. In our “Core Earnings” presentation, we recognize the economic effect of these hedges, which generally results in any net settlement cash paid or received being recognized ratably as an interest expense or revenue over the hedged item’s life.

The accounting for derivatives requires that changes in the fair value of derivative instruments be recognized currently in earnings, with no fair value adjustment of the hedged item, unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. We believe that our derivatives are effective economic hedges, and as such, are a critical element of our interest rate and foreign currency risk management strategy. However, some of our derivatives, primarily Floor Income Contracts and certain basis swaps, do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and the stand-alone derivative must be marked-to-market in the income statement with no consideration for the corresponding change in fair value of the hedged item. These gains and losses recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net” are primarily caused by interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate volatility and changing credit spreads during the period as well as the volume and term of derivatives not receiving hedge accounting treatment.

Our Floor Income Contracts are written options that must meet more stringent requirements than other hedging relationships to achieve hedge effectiveness. Specifically, our Floor Income Contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment because the pay down of principal of the student loans underlying the Floor Income embedded in those student loans does not exactly match the change in the notional amount of our written Floor Income Contracts. Additionally, the term, the interest rate index, and the interest rate index reset frequency of the Floor Income Contract can be different than that of the student loans. Under derivative accounting treatment, the upfront payment is deemed a liability and changes in fair value are recorded through income throughout the life of the contract. The change in the value of Floor Income Contracts is primarily caused by changing interest rates that cause the amount of Floor Income earned on the underlying student loans and paid to the counterparties to vary. This is economically offset by the change in value of the student loan portfolio earning Floor Income but that offsetting change in value is not recognized. We believe the Floor Income Contracts are economic hedges because they effectively fix the amount of Floor Income earned over the contract period, thus eliminating the timing and uncertainty that changes in interest rates can have on Floor Income for that period. Therefore, for purposes of “Core Earnings,” we have removed the unrealized gains and losses related to these contracts and

added back the amortization of the net premiums received on the Floor Income Contracts. The amortization of the net premiums received on the Floor Income Contracts for “Core Earnings” is reflected in student loan interest income. Under GAAP accounting, the premiums received on the Floor Income Contracts are recorded as revenue in the “losses on derivative and hedging activities, net” line item by the end of the contracts’ lives.

Basis swaps are used to convert floating rate debt from one floating interest rate index to another to better match the interest rate characteristics of the assets financed by that debt. We primarily use basis swaps to hedge our student loan assets that are primarily indexed to LIBOR, Prime or Treasury bill index (for $128 billion of our FFELP assets as of April 1, 2012, we elected to change the index from commercial paper to LIBOR). In addition, we use basis swaps to convert debt indexed to the Consumer Price Index to three-month LIBOR debt. The accounting for derivatives requires that when using basis swaps, the change in the cash flows of the hedge effectively offset both the change in the cash flows of the asset and the change in the cash flows of the liability. Our basis swaps hedge variable interest rate risk; however, they generally do not meet this effectiveness test because the index of the swap does not exactly match the index of the hedged assets as required for hedge accounting treatment. Additionally, some of our FFELP Loans can earn at either a variable or a fixed interest rate depending on market interest rates and therefore swaps economically hedging these FFELP Loans do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting treatment. As a result, under GAAP, these swaps are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reflected currently in the income statement.

The table below quantifies the adjustments for derivative accounting between GAAP and “Core Earnings” net income.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
“Core Earnings” derivative adjustments:
Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net, included in other income	$	18		$	6		$	(13	)	$	(366	)
Plus: Realized losses on derivative and hedging activities, net ⁽¹⁾		185			188			373			367

Unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net ⁽²⁾		203			194			360			1
Amortization of net premiums on Floor Income Contracts in net interest income for “Core Earnings”		(76	)		(98	)		(152	)		(196	)
Other derivative accounting adjustments ⁽³⁾		16			(14	)		44			12

Total net impact of derivative accounting ⁽⁴⁾	$	143		$	82		$	252		$	(183	)

⁽¹⁾

See “Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) on Derivative and Hedging Activities” below for a detailed breakdown of the components of realized losses on derivative and hedging activities.

⁽²⁾

“Unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net” comprises the following unrealized mark-to-market gains (losses):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Floor Income Contracts	$	297		$	50		$	486		$	186
Basis swaps		(15	)		(26	)		(19	)		(48	)
Foreign currency hedges		(67	)		172			(99	)		(122	)
Other		(12	)		(2	)		(8	)		(15	)

Total unrealized gains on derivative and hedging activities, net	$	203		$	194		$	360		$	1

⁽³⁾

Other derivative accounting adjustments consist of adjustments related to: (1) foreign currency denominated debt that is adjusted to spot foreign exchange rates for GAAP where such adjustment are reversed for “Core Earnings” and (2) certain terminated derivatives that did not receive hedge accounting treatment under GAAP but were economic hedges under “Core Earnings” and, as a result, such gains or losses amortized into “Core Earnings” over the life of the hedged item.

⁽⁴⁾

Negative amounts are subtracted from “Core Earnings” net income to arrive at GAAP net income and positive amounts are added to “Core Earnings” net income to arrive at GAAP net income.

Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) on Derivative and Hedging Activities

Derivative accounting requires net settlement income/expense on derivatives and realized gains/losses related to derivative dispositions (collectively referred to as “realized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities”) that do not qualify as hedges to be recorded in a separate income statement line item below net interest income. Under our “Core Earnings” presentation, these gains and losses are reclassified to the income statement line item of the economically hedged item. For our “Core Earnings” net interest margin, this would primarily include: (a) reclassifying the net settlement amounts related to our Floor Income Contracts to student loan interest income and (b) reclassifying the net settlement amounts related to certain of our basis swaps to debt interest expense. The table below summarizes the realized losses on derivative and hedging activities and the associated reclassification on a “Core Earnings” basis.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Reclassification of realized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities:
Net settlement expense on Floor Income Contracts reclassified to net interest income	$	(198	)	$	(223	)	$	(410	)	$	(437	)
Net settlement income on interest rate swaps reclassified to net interest income		13			34			31			70
Foreign exchange derivatives gains reclassified to other income		—			1			—			—
Net realized gains on terminated derivative contracts reclassified to other income		—			—			6			—

Total reclassifications of realized losses on derivative and hedging activities	$	(185	)	$	(188	)	$	(373	)	$	(367	)

Cumulative Impact of Derivative Accounting under GAAP compared to “Core Earnings”

As of June 30, 2013, derivative accounting has reduced GAAP equity by approximately $923 million as a result of cumulative net unrealized losses (after tax) recognized under GAAP, but not in “Core Earnings.” The following table rolls forward the cumulative impact to GAAP equity due to these unrealized after tax net losses related to derivative accounting.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Beginning impact of derivative accounting on GAAP equity	$	(1,027	)	$	(1,149	)	$	(1,080	)	$	(977	)
Net impact of net unrealized gains (losses) under derivative accounting ⁽¹⁾		104			51			157			(121	)

Ending impact of derivative accounting on GAAP equity	$	(923	)	$	(1,098	)	$	(923	)	$	(1,098	)

(1)

Net impact of net unrealized gains (losses) under derivative accounting is composed of the following:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Total pre-tax net impact of derivative accounting recognized in net income ^(a)	$	143		$	82		$	252		$	(183	)
Tax impact of derivative accounting adjustments recognized in net income		(54	)		(30	)		(113	)		58
Change in unrealized gain (losses) on derivatives, net of tax recognized in other comprehensive income		15			(1	)		18			4

Net impact of net unrealized gains (losses) under derivative accounting	$	104		$	51		$	157		$	(121	)

^(a)

See “‘Core Earnings’ derivative adjustments” table above.

Net Floor premiums received on Floor Income Contracts that have not been amortized into “Core Earnings” as of the respective year-ends are presented in the table below. These net premiums will be recognized in “Core Earnings” in future periods and are presented net of tax. As of June 30, 2013, the remaining amortization term of the net floor premiums was approximately 3.0 years for existing contracts. Historically, we have sold Floor Income Contracts on a periodic basis and depending upon market conditions and pricing, we may enter into additional Floor Income Contracts in the future. The balance of unamortized Floor Income Contracts will increase as we sell new contracts and decline due to the amortization of existing contracts.


	June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012
Unamortized net Floor premiums (net of tax)	$	(452	)	$	(650	)

2) Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets: Our “Core Earnings” exclude goodwill and intangible asset impairment and the amortization of acquired intangible assets. The following table summarizes the goodwill and acquired intangible asset adjustments.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
“Core Earnings” goodwill and acquired intangible asset adjustments ⁽¹⁾	$	(4	)	$	(5	)	$	(7	)	$	(9	)

⁽¹⁾

Negative amounts are subtracted from “Core Earnings” net income to arrive at GAAP net income.

Business Segment Earnings Summary — “Core Earnings” Basis

Consumer Lending Segment

The following table includes “Core Earnings” results for our Consumer Lending segment.


	Three Months Ended June 30,					% Increase (Decrease)			Six Months Ended June 30,						% Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012			2013 vs. 2012			2013			2012			2013 vs. 2012
“Core Earnings” interest income:
Private Education Loans	$	627	$	616			2	%	$	1,249		$	1,241			1	%
Cash and investments		1		2			(50	)		4			3			33

Total “Core Earnings” interest income		628		618			2			1,253			1,244			1
Total “Core Earnings” interest expense		206		205			—			410			406			1

Net “Core Earnings” interest income		422		413			2			843			838			1
Less: provision for loan losses		187		225			(17	)		412			460			(10	)

Net “Core Earnings” interest income after provision for loan losses		235		188			25			431			378			14
Servicing revenue		10		11			(9	)		21			23			(9	)
Direct operating expenses		76		63			21			143			131			9
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		2		1			100			2			2			—

Total expenses		78		64			22			145			133			9

Income from continuing operations, before income tax expense		167		135			24			307			268			15
Income tax expense		60		49			22			113			98			15

Net income from continuing operations		107		86			24			194			170			14
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit		—		(1	)		(100	)		(1	)		(1	)		—

“Core Earnings”	$	107	$	85			26	%	$	193		$	169			14	%

Quarterly “Core Earnings” were $107 million compared with $85 million in the year-ago quarter. The increase is primarily the result of a $38 million decrease in the provision for Private Education Loan losses.

Second-quarter 2013 private education loan portfolio results vs. second-quarter 2012 included:

•

Loan originations of $368 million, up 15 percent.

•

Delinquencies of 90 days or more of 3.6 percent of loans in repayment, down from 4.5 percent.

•

Loans in forbearance of 3.5 percent of loans in repayment and forbearance, down from 4.3 percent.

•

Annualized charge-off rate of 2.7 percent of average loans in repayment, down from 3.1 percent.

•

Provision for private education loan losses of $187 million, down from $225 million.

•

“Core Earnings” net interest margin, before loan loss provision, of 4.12 percent, down from 4.14 percent.

•

The portfolio balance, net of loan loss allowance, totaled $37 billion, a $662 million increase over the year-ago quarter.

Consumer Lending Net Interest Margin

The following table shows the “Core Earnings” basis Consumer Lending net interest margin along with reconciliation to the GAAP-basis Consumer Lending net interest margin before provision for loan losses.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
“Core Earnings” basis Private Education Loan yield		6.37	%		6.36	%		6.36	%		6.39	%
Discount amortization		.22			.24			.22			.24

“Core Earnings” basis Private Education Loan net yield		6.59			6.60			6.58			6.63
“Core Earnings” basis Private Education Loan cost of funds		(2.04	)		(2.05	)		(2.02	)		(2.03	)

“Core Earnings” basis Private Education Loan spread		4.55			4.55			4.56			4.60
“Core Earnings” basis other interest-earning asset spread impact		(.43	)		(.41	)		(.43	)		(.40	)

“Core Earnings” basis Consumer Lending net interest margin ⁽¹⁾		4.12	%		4.14	%		4.13	%		4.20	%


“Core Earnings” basis Consumer Lending net interest margin ⁽¹⁾		4.12	%		4.14	%		4.13	%		4.20	%
Adjustment for GAAP accounting treatment ⁽²⁾		(.04	)		(.11	)		(.03	)		(.12	)

GAAP basis Consumer Lending net interest margin ⁽¹⁾		4.08	%		4.03	%		4.10	%		4.08	%

⁽¹⁾

The average balances of our Consumer Lending “Core Earnings” basis interest-earning assets for the respective periods are:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Private Education Loans	$	38,154	$	37,543	$	38,279	$	37,646
Other interest-earning assets		2,937		2,544		2,800		2,436

Total Consumer Lending “Core Earnings” basis interest-earning assets	$	41,091	$	40,087	$	41,079	$	40,082

⁽²⁾

Represents the reclassification of periodic interest accruals on derivative contracts from net interest income to other income and other derivative accounting adjustments. For further discussion of these adjustments, see section titled “‘Core Earnings’ — Definition and Limitations — Difference between ‘Core Earnings’ and GAAP” above.

Private Education Loan Provision for Loan Losses and Charge-Offs

The following table summarizes the total Private Education Loan provision for loan losses and charge-offs.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Private Education Loan provision for loan losses	$	187	$	225	$	412	$	460
Private Education Loan charge-offs		212		235		444		459

In establishing the allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of June 30, 2013, we considered several factors with respect to our Private Education Loan portfolio. In particular, we continue to see improvement in credit quality and continuing positive delinquency, forbearance and charge-off trends in connection with this portfolio. Improving credit quality is seen in higher FICO scores and cosigner rates as well as a more seasoned portfolio. Total loans delinquent (as a percentage of loans in repayment) have decreased to 7.7 percent from 10.0 percent in the year-ago quarter. Loans greater than 90 days delinquent (as a percentage of loans in repayment) have decreased to 3.6 percent from 4.5 percent in the year-ago quarter. Loans in forbearance (as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance) have decreased to 3.5 percent from 4.3 percent in the year-ago quarter. The charge-off rate decreased to 2.7 percent from 3.1 percent in the year-ago quarter.

Additionally, Private Education Loans that have defaulted between 2008 and 2012 for which we have previously charged off estimated losses have, to varying degrees, not met our post-default recovery expectations to date and may continue to not do so. Our allowance for loan losses takes into account these potential recovery uncertainties.

The Private Education Loan provision for loan losses was $187 million in the second quarter of 2013, down $38 million from the second quarter of 2012, and $412 million for the first six months of 2013, down $48 million from the year-ago period. The decline in both periods was a result of the overall improvement in credit quality and performance trends discussed above, leading to decreases in expected future charge-offs.

For a more detailed discussion of our policy for determining the collectability of Private Education Loans and maintaining our allowance for Private Education Loan losses, see Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Loan Losses” in the 2012 Form 10-K.

Operating Expenses — Consumer Lending Segment

Operating expenses for our Consumer Lending segment include costs incurred to originate Private Education Loans and to service and collect on our Private Education Loan portfolio. The increase in operating expenses in the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared with the year-ago quarter was primarily the result of higher marketing and collection costs as well as continued investments in technology. Operating expenses were 80 basis points and 68 basis points of average Private Education Loans in the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 75 basis points and 70 basis points of average Private Education Loans in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Business Services Segment

The following table includes “Core Earnings” results for our Business Services segment.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						% Increase (Decrease)			Six Months Ended June 30,						% Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013 vs. 2012			2013			2012			2013 vs. 2012
Net interest income	$	1		$	2			(50	)%	$	3		$	4			(25	)%
Servicing revenue:
Intercompany loan servicing		137			172			(20	)		287			348			(18	)
Third-party loan servicing		33			26			27			61			48			27
Guarantor servicing		10			11			(9	)		20			22			(9	)
Other servicing		20			18			11			37			38			(3	)

Total servicing revenue		200			227			(12	)		405			456			(11	)
Contingency revenue		109			87			25			208			176			18
Other Business Services revenue		8			7			14			14			16			(13	)

Total other income		317			321			(1	)		627			648			(3	)
Direct operating expenses		113			101			12			222			211			5
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		1			2			(50	)		2			2			—

Total expenses		114			103			11			224			213			5

Income from continuing operations, before income tax expense		204			220			(7	)		406			439			(8	)
Income tax expense		74			81			(9	)		149			160			(7	)

Net income from continuing operations		130			139			(6	)		257			279			(8	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax expense (benefit)		35			(3	)		1,267			34			(5	)		780

“Core Earnings”		165			136			21			291			274			6
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1	)		(1	)		—			(1	)		(1	)		—

“Core Earnings” attributable to SLM Corporation	$	166		$	137			21	%	$	292		$	275			6	%

“Core Earnings” were $166 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared with $137 million in the year-ago quarter. The increase was primarily due to the sale of our Campus Solutions business and the related $38 million after-tax gain recognized.

Our Business Services segment includes intercompany loan servicing fees from servicing the FFELP Loans in our FFELP Loans segment. The average balance of this portfolio was $116 billion and $133 billion for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $119 billion and $134 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decline in intercompany loan servicing revenue from the year-ago period is primarily the result of a lower outstanding principal balance in the underlying portfolio.

We are servicing approximately 5.2 million accounts under the ED Servicing Contract as of June 30, 2013, compared with 3.8 million accounts serviced at June 30, 2012. Third-party loan servicing fees in the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 included $26 million and $22 million, respectively, of servicing revenue related to the ED Servicing Contract. This increase in ED loan servicing fees for both the quarter and six-month periods were driven by the increase in the number of accounts serviced. The three and six months ended June 30, 2012 included $3.1 million of additional servicing revenue related to the administration and servicing of the SDCL program.

Third-party loan servicing income increased $7 million from the year-ago quarter and $13 million for the first six months compared with the prior-year period primarily due to the increase in ED servicing revenue (discussed above) as well as a result of the sale of Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts in 2013. (See “FFELP Loans Segment” for further discussion.) When we sold the Residual Interests, we retained the right to service the trusts. As such, servicing income that had previously been recorded as intercompany loan servicing is now recognized as third-party loan servicing income.

At June 30, 2013, we serviced approximately $283 billion principal balance of student loans compared with approximately $252 billion serviced at December 31, 2012. The increase in the principal balance serviced in 2013 was primarily due to the growth in the ED serviced accounts discussed above.

Our contingency revenue consists of fees we receive for collections of delinquent debt on behalf of third-party clients performed on a contingent basis. Contingency revenue increased $22 million in the current quarter compared with the year-ago quarter and $32 million for the first six months of 2013 compared with the prior-year period as a result of the higher volume of collections.

The following table presents the outstanding inventory of contingent collections receivables that our Business Services segment will collect on behalf of others. We expect the inventory of contingent collections receivables to decline over time as a result of the elimination of FFELP.


(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012		June 30, 2012
Contingent collections receivables:
Student loans	$	12,230	$	13,189	$	10,620
Other		2,377		2,139		1,864

Total	$	14,607	$	15,328	$	12,484

In the second quarter of 2013, we sold our Campus Solutions business and recorded an after-tax gain of $38 million. The results related to this business for all periods presented have been reclassified as discontinued operations and are shown on an after-tax basis.

Revenues related to services performed on FFELP Loans accounted for 73 percent and 78 percent, respectively, of total segment revenues for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and 74 percent and 78 percent, respectively, of total segment revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Operating Expenses — Business Services Segment

Operating expenses for our Business Services segment primarily include costs incurred to service our FFELP Loan portfolio, third-party servicing and collection costs, and other operating costs. The increase in operating expenses in the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared with the year-ago quarter was primarily the result of an increase in our third-party servicing and collection activities as well as continued investments in technology.

FFELP Loans Segment

The following table includes “Core Earnings” results for our FFELP Loans segment.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				% Increase (Decrease)			Six Months Ended June 30,				% Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012		2013 vs. 2012			2013		2012		2013 vs. 2012
“Core Earnings” interest income:
FFELP Loans	$	581	$	652		(11	)%	$	1,181	$	1,378		(14	)%
Cash and investments		2		3		(33	)		3		5		(40	)

Total “Core Earnings” interest income		583		655		(11	)		1,184		1,383		(14	)
Total “Core Earnings” interest expense		325		409		(21	)		665		832		(20	)

Net “Core Earnings” interest income		258		246		5			519		551		(6	)
Less: provision for loan losses		14		18		(22	)		30		36		(17	)

Net “Core Earnings” interest income after provision for loan losses		244		228		7			489		515		(5	)
Gains on sales of loans and investments		257		—		100			312		—		100
Servicing revenue		16		22		(27	)		39		47		(17	)

Total other income		273		22		1,141			351		47		647
Direct operating expenses		144		181		(20	)		301		366		(18	)
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		—		—		—			—		—		—

Total expenses		144		181		(20	)		301		366		(18	)

Income from continuing operations, before income tax expense		373		69		441			539		196		175
Income tax expense		136		25		444			198		72		175

“Core Earnings”	$	237	$	44		439	%	$	341	$	124		175	%

“Core Earnings” from the FFELP Loans segment were $237 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared with $44 million in the year-ago quarter. The increase was primarily the result of a $257 million gain from the sale of the Residual Interest in a FFELP Loan securitization trust. Key financial measures include:

•

Net interest margin of .87 percent in the second quarter of 2013 compared with .70 percent in the year-ago quarter (see “FFELP Loan Net Interest Margin” for a further discussion of this increase).

•

The provision for loan losses of $14 million in the second quarter of 2013 decreased from $18 million in the year-ago quarter.

FFELP Loan Net Interest Margin

The following table includes the “Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan net interest margin along with reconciliation to the GAAP-basis FFELP Loan net interest margin.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
“Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan yield		2.60	%		2.66	%		2.61	%		2.65	%
Hedged Floor Income		.27			.29			.26			.29
Unhedged Floor Income		.10			.07			.08			.09
Consolidation Loan Rebate Fees		(.65	)		(.67	)		(.67	)		(.66	)
Repayment Borrower Benefits		(.11	)		(.14	)		(.11	)		(.13	)
Premium amortization		(.16	)		(.27	)		(.15	)		(.20	)

“Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan net yield		2.05			1.94			2.02			2.04
“Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan cost of funds		(1.08	)		(1.14	)		(1.07	)		(1.16	)

“Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan spread		.97			.80			.95			.88
“Core Earnings” basis other interest-earning asset spread impact		(.10	)		(.10	)		(.10	)		(.10	)

“Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan net interest margin ⁽¹⁾		.87	%		.70	%		.85	%		.78	%


“Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan net interest margin ⁽¹⁾		.87	%		.70	%		.85	%		.78	%
Adjustment for GAAP accounting treatment ⁽²⁾		.38			.30			.39			.28

GAAP-basis FFELP Loan net interest margin ⁽¹⁾		1.25	%		1.00	%		1.24	%		1.06	%

⁽¹⁾

The average balances of our FFELP “Core Earnings” basis interest-earning assets for the respective periods are:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012		2013		2012
FFELP Loans	$	113,981	$	134,893	$	117,896	$	136,043
Other interest-earning assets		5,264		6,291		5,409		6,359

Total FFELP “Core Earnings” basis interest-earning assets	$	119,245	$	141,184	$	123,305	$	142,402

⁽²⁾

Represents the reclassification of periodic interest accruals on derivative contracts from net interest income to other income, the reversal of the amortization of premiums received on Floor Income Contracts, and other derivative accounting adjustments. For further discussion of these adjustments, see section titled “‘Core Earnings’ — Definition and Limitations — Difference between ‘Core Earnings’ and GAAP” above.

The increase in the “Core Earnings” basis FFELP Loan net interest margin of 17 basis points for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as well as the 7 basis points increase for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the prior year, was primarily the result of a $50 million acceleration of non-cash premium expense recorded in second quarter 2012 related to ED’s consolidation of $5.2 billion of loans under the SDCL initiative that ended June 30, 2012. See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Business Segment Earnings Summary – ‘Core Earnings’ Basis — FFELP Loans Segment” in our 2012 Form 10-K.

As of June 30, 2013, our FFELP Loan portfolio totaled approximately $108.5 billion, comprised of $41.9 billion of FFELP Stafford and $66.6 billion of FFELP Consolidation Loans. The weighted-average life of these portfolios is 4.9 years and 9.5 years, respectively, assuming a Constant Prepayment Rate (“CPR”) of 4 percent and 3 percent, respectively.

Floor Income

The following table analyzes the ability of the FFELP Loans in our portfolio to earn Floor Income after June 30, 2013 and 2012, based on interest rates as of those dates.


	June 30, 2013									June 30, 2012
(Dollars in billions)	Fixed Borrower Rate			Variable Borrower Rate			Total			Fixed Borrower Rate			Variable Borrower Rate			Total
Student loans eligible to earn Floor Income	$	93.0		$	14.1		$	107.1		$	114.5		$	16.4		$	130.9
Less: post-March 31, 2006 disbursed loans required to rebate Floor Income		(47.0	)		(1.0	)		(48.0	)		(61.0	)		(1.1	)		(62.1	)
Less: economically hedged Floor Income Contracts		(31.7	)		—			(31.7	)		(35.2	)		—			(35.2	)

Student loans eligible to earn Floor Income	$	14.3		$	13.1		$	27.4		$	18.3		$	15.3		$	33.6

Student loans earning Floor Income	$	14.2		$	0.7		$	14.9		$	10.5		$	2.1		$	12.6

We have sold Floor Income Contracts to hedge the potential Floor Income from specifically identified pools of FFELP Consolidation Loans that are eligible to earn Floor Income.

The following table presents a projection of the average balance of FFELP Consolidation Loans for which Fixed Rate Floor Income has been economically hedged through Floor Income Contracts for the period July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2016. The hedges related to these loans do not qualify as accounting hedges.


(Dollars in billions)	July 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013		2014		2015		2016
Average balance of FFELP Consolidation Loans whose Floor Income is economically hedged	$	31.7	$	28.3	$	27.2	$	10.4

FFELP Loan Provision for Loan Losses and Charge-Offs

The following table summarizes the total FFELP Loan provision for loan losses and charge-offs for the three and six months June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012		2013		2012
FFELP Loan provision for loan losses	$	14	$	18	$	30	$	36
FFELP Loan charge-offs		20		23		42		46

Gains on Sales of Loans and Investments

The increase in gains on sales of loans and investments from the year-ago quarter was the result of $257 million in gains from the sale of Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts.

The increase in gains on sales of loans and investments from the first six months of 2012 was the result of $312 million in gains from the sale of Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts.

We will continue to service the student loans in the trusts that were sold under existing agreements. The sales removed securitization trust assets of $12.5 billion and related liabilities of $12.1 billion from the balance sheet during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Operating Expenses — FFELP Loans

Operating expenses for our FFELP Loans segment primarily include the contractual rates we pay to service loans in term asset-backed securitization trusts or a similar rate if a loan is not in a term financing facility (which is presented as an intercompany charge from the Business Services segment who services the loans), the fees we pay for third-party loan servicing and costs incurred to acquire loans. The intercompany revenue charged by the Business Services segment and included in those amounts was $137 million and $172 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $287 million and $348 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These amounts exceed the actual cost of servicing the loans. Operating expenses were 51 basis points and 54 basis points of average FFELP Loans in the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 51 basis points and 54 basis points of average FFELP Loans in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decline in operating expenses from the prior-year quarter was primarily the result of the reduction in the average outstanding balance of our FFELP Loan portfolio.

Other Segment

The following table includes “Core Earnings” results of our Other segment.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						% Increase (Decrease)			Six Months Ended June 30,						% Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013 vs. 2012			2013			2012			2013 vs. 2012
Net interest loss after provision for loan losses	$	(6	)	$	(5	)		20	%	$	(14	)	$	(7	)		100	%
Losses on sales of loans and investments		(6	)		—			100			(5	)		—			100
Gains on debt repurchases		19			20			(5	)		48			58			(17	)
Other		—			6			(100	)		1			8			(88	)

Total other income		13			26			(50	)		44			66			(33	)

Direct operating expenses		3			4			(25	)		7			6			17
Overhead expenses:
Corporate overhead		29			27			7			64			61			5
Unallocated information technology costs		30			27			11			58			55			5

Total overhead expenses		59			54			9			122			116			5

Total operating expenses		62			58			7			129			122			6
Restructuring and other reorganization expenses		21			—			100			31			3			933

Total expenses		83			58			43			160			125			28

Loss before income tax benefit		(76	)		(37	)		105			(130	)		(66	)		97
Income tax benefit		(28	)		(14	)		100			(48	)		(25	)		92

“Core Earnings” (loss)	$	(48	)	$	(23	)		109	%	$	(82	)	$	(41	)		100	%

Net Interest Loss after Provision for Loan Losses

Net interest loss after provision for loan losses includes net interest income related to our corporate liquidity portfolio as well as net interest income and provision expense related to our mortgage and consumer loan portfolios.

Gains on Debt Repurchases

We repurchased $70 million and $85 million face amount of our debt for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and $997 million and $290 million face amount of our debt for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Overhead

Corporate overhead is comprised of costs related to executive management, the board of directors, accounting, finance, legal, human resources and stock-based compensation expense. Unallocated information technology costs are related to infrastructure and operations. The increase in overhead for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the year-ago period was primarily the result of a non-recurring $10 million pension termination gain in the first six months of 2012, which was partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense in 2013 compared with 2012.

Restructuring and Other Reorganization Expenses

Restructuring and other reorganization expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 were $21 million compared with $0 in the year-ago quarter. For the quarter ended June 30, 2013, these consisted of $11 million related to severance and $10 million related to the Company’s previously announced plan to separate its existing organization into two publicly-traded companies.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, restructuring and other reorganization expenses were $31 million compared with $3 million in the year-ago period. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, these consisted of $19 million related to severance and $12 million related to the Company’s previously announced plan to separate its existing organization into two publicly-traded companies. The $3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 was related to restructuring expenses.

Financial Condition

This section provides additional information regarding the changes in our loan portfolio assets and related liabilities as well as credit quality and performance indicators related to our loan portfolio.

Average Balance Sheets — GAAP

The following table reflects the rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities and reflects our net interest margin on a consolidated basis.


	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013					2012					2013					2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate
Average Assets
FFELP Loans	$	113,981		2.48	%	$	134,893		2.32	%	$	117,896		2.46	%	$	136,043		2.39	%
Private Education Loans		38,154		6.59			37,543		6.60			38,279		6.58			37,646		6.63
Other loans		123		9.64			179		9.31			128		9.50			183		9.50
Cash and investments		9,395		.17			10,233		.20			9,636		.17			9,715		.19

Total interest-earning assets		161,653		3.32	%		182,848		3.08	%		165,939		3.28	%		183,587		3.15	%

Non-interest-earning assets		4,287					4,794					4,426					4,781

Total assets	$	165,940				$	187,642				$	170,365				$	188,368

Average Liabilities and Equity
Short-term borrowings	$	17,122		.98	%	$	26,272		.88	%	$	18,091		1.00	%	$	27,654		.90	%
Long-term borrowings		140,170		1.46			152,500		1.58			143,554		1.45			151,791		1.59

Total interest-bearing liabilities		157,292		1.41	%		178,772		1.48	%		161,645		1.40	%		179,445		1.48	%

Non-interest-bearing liabilities		3,390					3,845					3,531					3,874
Equity		5,258					5,025					5,189					5,049

Total liabilities and equity	$	165,940				$	187,642				$	170,365				$	188,368

Net interest margin				1.94	%				1.64	%				1.92	%				1.71	%

Rate/Volume Analysis — GAAP

The following rate/volume analysis shows the relative contribution of changes in interest rates and asset volumes.


(Dollars in millions)	Increase (Decrease)			Change Due To ⁽¹⁾
(Dollars in millions)	Increase (Decrease)			Rate			Volume
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012
Interest income	$	(66	)	$	101		$	(167	)
Interest expense		(103	)		(29	)		(74	)

Net interest income	$	37		$	129		$	(92	)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012
Interest income	$	(175	)	$	116		$	(291	)
Interest expense		(199	)		(69	)		(130	)

Net interest income	$	24		$	184		$	(160	)

⁽¹⁾

Changes in income and expense due to both rate and volume have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. The changes in income and expense are calculated independently for each line in the table. The totals for the rate and volume columns are not the sum of the individual lines.

Summary of our Student Loan Portfolio

Ending Student Loan Balances, net


	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Total student loan portfolio:
In-school ⁽¹⁾	$	1,050		$	—		$	1,050		$	2,132		$	3,182
Grace, repayment and other ⁽²⁾		40,271			66,217			106,488			36,551			143,039

Total, gross		41,321			66,217			107,538			38,683			146,221
Unamortized premium/(discount)		641			445			1,086			(752	)		334
Receivable for partially charged-off loans		—			—			—			1,334			1,334
Allowance for loan losses		(88	)		(45	)		(133	)		(2,149	)		(2,282	)

Total student loan portfolio	$	41,874		$	66,617		$	108,491		$	37,116		$	145,607

% of total FFELP		39	%		61	%		100	%
% of total		29	%		46	%		75	%		25	%		100	%


	December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Total student loan portfolio:
In-school ⁽¹⁾	$	1,506		$	—		$	1,506		$	2,194		$	3,700
Grace, repayment and other ⁽²⁾		42,189			80,640			122,829			36,360			159,189

Total, gross		43,695			80,640			124,335			38,554			162,889
Unamortized premium/(discount)		691			745			1,436			(796	)		640
Receivable for partially charged-off loans		—			—			—			1,347			1,347
Allowance for loan losses		(97	)		(62	)		(159	)		(2,171	)		(2,330	)

Total student loan portfolio	$	44,289		$	81,323		$	125,612		$	36,934		$	162,546

% of total FFELP		35	%		65	%		100	%
% of total		27	%		50	%		77	%		23	%		100	%

⁽¹⁾	Loans for customers still attending school and are not yet required to make payments on the loan.

⁽²⁾	Includes loans in deferment or forbearance.

Average Student Loan Balances (net of unamortized premium/discount)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Total	$	42,516		$	71,465		$	113,981		$	38,154		$	152,135
% of FFELP		37	%		63	%		100	%
% of total		28	%		47	%		75	%		25	%		100	%


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Total	$	49,159		$	85,734		$	134,893		$	37,543		$	172,436
% of FFELP		36	%		64	%		100	%
% of total		28	%		50	%		78	%		22	%		100	%


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Total	$	43,115		$	74,781		$	117,896		$	38,279		$	156,175
% of FFELP		37	%		63	%		100	%
% of total		27	%		48	%		75	%		25	%		100	%


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Total	$	49,654		$	86,389		$	136,043		$	37,646		$	173,689
% of FFELP		36	%		64	%		100	%
% of total		28	%		50	%		78	%		22	%		100	%

Student Loan Activity


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Total Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Beginning balance	$	43,005		$	76,190		$	119,195		$	37,465		$	156,660
Acquisitions and originations		57			74			131			390			521
Capitalized interest and premium/discount amortization		285			272			557			210			767
Consolidations to third parties		(378	)		(235	)		(613	)		(25	)		(638	)
Sales ⁽¹⁾		(30	)		(8,398	)		(8,428	)		—			(8,428	)
Repayments and other		(1,065	)		(1,286	)		(2,351	)		(924	)		(3,275	)

Ending balance	$	41,874		$	66,617		$	108,491		$	37,116		$	145,607


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Total Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Beginning balance	$	49,508		$	86,426		$	135,934		$	36,732		$	172,666
Acquisitions and originations		1,331			495			1,826			341			2,167
Capitalized interest and premium/discount amortization		310			349			659			263			922
Consolidations to third parties		(1,711	)		(1,035	)		(2,746	)		(19	)		(2,765	)
Sales		(149	)		—			(149	)		—			(149	)
Repayments and other		(1,176	)		(1,515	)		(2,691	)		(863	)		(3,554	)

Ending balance	$	48,113		$	84,720		$	132,833		$	36,454		$	169,287


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Total Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Beginning balance	$	44,289		$	81,323		$	125,612		$	36,934		$	162,546
Acquisitions and originations		158			127			285			1,795			2,080
Capitalized interest and premium/discount amortization		580			585			1,165			410			1,575
Consolidations to third parties		(823	)		(510	)		(1,333	)		(49	)		(1,382	)
Sales ⁽²⁾		(102	)		(12,147	)		(12,249	)		—			(12,249	)
Repayments and other		(2,228	)		(2,761	)		(4,989	)		(1,974	)		(6,963	)

Ending balance	$	41,874		$	66,617		$	108,491		$	37,116		$	145,607


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Stafford and Other			FFELP Consolidation Loans			Total FFELP Loans			Total Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Beginning balance	$	50,440		$	87,690		$	138,130		$	36,290		$	174,420
Acquisitions and originations		2,150			573			2,723			1,492			4,215
Capitalized interest and premium/discount amortization		645			747			1,392			508			1,900
Consolidations to third parties		(2,430	)		(1,260	)		(3,690	)		(42	)		(3,732	)
Sales		(284	)		—			(284	)		—			(284	)
Repayments and other		(2,408	)		(3,030	)		(5,438	)		(1,794	)		(7,232	)

Ending balance	$	48,113		$	84,720		$	132,833		$	36,454		$	169,287

⁽¹⁾	Includes $8.3 billion of student loans in connection with the sale of Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts.

⁽²⁾	Includes $12.0 billion of student loans in connection with the sale of Residual Interests in FFELP Loan securitization trusts.

Student Loan Allowance for Loan Losses Activity


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013									2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio			FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Beginning balance	$	147		$	2,170		$	2,317		$	180		$	2,190		$	2,370
Less:
Charge-offs ⁽¹⁾		(20	)		(212	)		(232	)		(23	)		(235	)		(258	)
Student loan sales		(8	)		—			(8	)		(2	)		—			(2	)
Plus:
Provision for loan losses		14			187			201			18			225			243
Reclassification of interest reserve ⁽²⁾		—			4			4			—			6			6

Ending balance	$	133		$	2,149		$	2,282		$	173		$	2,186		$	2,359

Troubled debt restructuring ⁽³⁾	$	—		$	8,094		$	8,094		$	—		$	6,413		$	6,413


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013									2012
(Dollars in millions)	FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio			FFELP Loans			Private Education Loans			Total Portfolio
Beginning balance	$	159		$	2,171		$	2,330		$	187		$	2,171		$	2,358
Less:
Charge-offs ⁽¹⁾		(42	)		(444	)		(486	)		(46	)		(459	)		(505	)
Student loan sales		(14	)		—			(14	)		(4	)		—			(4	)
Plus:
Provision for loan losses		30			412			442			36			460			496
Reclassification of interest reserve ⁽²⁾		—			10			10			—			14			14

Ending balance	$	133		$	2,149		$	2,282		$	173		$	2,186		$	2,359

Troubled debt restructuring ⁽³⁾	$	—		$	8,094		$	8,094		$	—		$	6,413		$	6,413

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾	Represents the additional allowance related to the amount of uncollectible interest reserved within interest income that is transferred in the period to the allowance for loan losses when interest is capitalized to a loan’s principal balance.

⁽³⁾	Represents the recorded investment of loans classified as troubled debt restructuring.

Private Education Loan Originations

The following table summarizes our Private Education Loan originations.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Smart Option — interest only ⁽¹⁾	$	85	$	100	$	450	$	458
Smart Option — fixed pay ⁽¹⁾		106		71		545		417
Smart Option — deferred ⁽¹⁾		145		122		735		553
Other		32		28		49		54

Total Private Education Loan originations	$	368	$	321	$	1,779	$	1,482

⁽¹⁾	Interest only, fixed pay and deferred describe the payment option while in school or in grace period. See “Consumer Lending Portfolio Performance — Private Education Loan Repayment Options” for further discussion.

Consumer Lending Portfolio Performance

Private Education Loan Delinquencies and Forbearance

The table below presents our Private Education Loan delinquency trends.


	Private Education Loan Delinquencies
	June 30,
	2013						2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance			%			Balance			%
Loans in-school/grace/deferment ⁽¹⁾	$	5,896					$	6,098
Loans in forbearance ⁽²⁾		1,160						1,368
Loans in repayment and percentage of each status:
Loans current		29,196			92.3	%		27,650			90.0	%
Loans delinquent 31-60 days ⁽³⁾		792			2.5			1,058			3.4
Loans delinquent 61-90 days ⁽³⁾		495			1.6			643			2.1
Loans delinquent greater than 90 days ⁽³⁾		1,144			3.6			1,380			4.5

Total Private Education Loans in repayment		31,627			100	%		30,731			100	%

Total Private Education Loans, gross		38,683						38,197
Private Education Loan unamortized discount		(752	)					(834	)

Total Private Education Loans		37,931						37,363
Private Education Loan receivable for partially charged-off loans		1,334						1,277
Private Education Loan allowance for losses		(2,149	)					(2,186	)

Private Education Loans, net	$	37,116					$	36,454

Percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment					81.8	%					80.5	%

Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment					7.7	%					10.0	%

Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance					3.5	%					4.3	%

Loans in repayment greater than 12 months as a percentage of loans in repayment ⁽⁴⁾					79.3	%					74.3	%

⁽¹⁾	Deferment includes customers who have returned to school or are engaged in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on their loans, e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation.

⁽²⁾	Loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period generally during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors, consistent with established loan program servicing policies and procedures.

⁽³⁾	The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.

⁽⁴⁾	Based on number of months in an active repayment status for which a scheduled monthly payment was due.

Allowance for Private Education Loan Losses

The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for Private Education Loan losses.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Allowance at beginning of period	$	2,170		$	2,190		$	2,171		$	2,171
Provision for Private Education Loan losses		187			225			412			460
Charge-offs ⁽¹⁾		(212	)		(235	)		(444	)		(459	)
Reclassification of interest reserve ^{(2 )}		4			6			10			14

Allowance at end of period	$	2,149		$	2,186		$	2,149		$	2,186

Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment (annualized)		2.7	%		3.1	%		2.8	%		3.0	%
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment and forbearance (annualized)		2.6	%		3.0	%		2.7	%		2.9	%
Allowance as a percentage of ending total loans		5.4	%		5.5	%		5.4	%		5.5	%
Allowance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment		6.8	%		7.1	%		6.8	%		7.1	%
Average coverage of charge-offs (annualized)		2.5			2.3			2.4			2.4
Ending total loans ⁽³⁾	$	40,017		$	39,474		$	40,017		$	39,474
Average loans in repayment	$	31,618		$	30,533		$	31,631		$	30,456
Ending loans in repayment	$	31,627		$	30,731		$	31,627		$	30,731

⁽¹⁾

Charge-offs are reported net of expected recoveries. The expected recovery amount is transferred to the receivable for partially charged-off loan balance. Charge-offs include charge-offs against the receivable for partially charged-off loans which represents the difference between what was expected to be collected and any shortfalls in what was actually collected in the period. See “Receivable for Partially Charged-Off Private Education Loans” for further discussion.

⁽²⁾	Represents the additional allowance related to the amount of uncollectible interest reserved within interest income that is transferred in the period to the allowance for loan losses when interest is capitalized to a loan’s principal balance.

⁽³⁾	Ending total loans represents gross Private Education Loans, plus the receivable for partially charged-off loans.

The following table provides the detail for our traditional and non-traditional Private Education Loans for the quarters ended.


	June 30, 2013									June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Traditional			Non- Traditional			Total			Traditional			Non- Traditional			Total
Ending total loans ⁽¹⁾	$	36,445		$	3,572		$	40,017		$	35,529		$	3,945		$	39,474
Ending loans in repayment		29,155			2,472			31,627			28,075			2,656			30,731
Private Education Loan allowance for losses		1,629			520			2,149			1,589			597			2,186
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment (annualized)		2.1	%		9.1	%		2.7	%		2.5	%		9.8	%		3.1	%
Allowance as a percentage of ending total loan balance		4.5	%		14.6	%		5.4	%		4.5	%		15.1	%		5.5	%
Allowance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment		5.6	%		21.0	%		6.8	%		5.7	%		22.5	%		7.1	%
Average coverage of charge-offs (annualized)		2.6			2.3			2.5			2.3			2.3			2.3
Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment		6.6	%		20.0	%		7.7	%		8.6	%		25.5	%		10.0	%
Delinquencies greater than 90 days as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment		3.1	%		10.2	%		3.6	%		3.7	%		12.6	%		4.5	%
Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance		3.4	%		5.5	%		3.5	%		4.1	%		6.4	%		4.3	%
Loans that entered repayment during the period ⁽²⁾	$	481		$	24		$	505		$	674		$	57		$	731
Percentage of Private Education Loans with a cosigner		69	%		30	%		66	%		66	%		29	%		63	%
Average FICO at origination		728			624			721			727			624			718

⁽¹⁾	Ending total loans represent gross Private Education Loans, plus the receivable for partially charged-off loans.

⁽²⁾	Includes loans that are required to make a payment for the first time.

As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most significant of these metrics considered are the allowance coverage of charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of total loans and of loans in repayment; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.

Receivable for Partially Charged-Off Private Education Loans

The following table summarizes the activity in the receivable for partially charged-off Private Education Loans.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Receivable at beginning of period	$	1,339		$	1,250		$	1,347		$	1,241
Expected future recoveries of current period defaults ⁽¹⁾		70			82			148			151
Recoveries ⁽²⁾		(54	)		(44	)		(122	)		(94	)
Charge-offs ⁽³⁾		(21	)		(11	)		(39	)		(21	)

Receivable at end of period		1,334			1,277			1,334			1,277
Allowance for estimated recovery shortfalls ⁽⁴⁾		(217	)		(141	)		(217	)		(141	)

Net receivable at end of period	$	1,117		$	1,136		$	1,117		$	1,136

⁽¹⁾	Represents the difference between the defaulted loan balance and our estimate of the amount to be collected in the future.

⁽²⁾	Current period cash collections.

⁽³⁾	Represents the current period recovery shortfall — the difference between what was expected to be collected and what was actually collected. These amounts are included in total charge-offs as reported in the “Allowance for Private Education Loan Losses” table.

⁽⁴⁾	The allowance for estimated recovery shortfalls of the receivable for partially charged-off Private Education Loans is a component of the $2.1 billion and $2.2 billion overall allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Use of Forbearance as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool

Forbearance involves granting the customer a temporary cessation of payments (or temporary acceptance of smaller than scheduled payments) for a specified period of time. Using forbearance extends the original term of the loan. Forbearance does not grant any reduction in the total repayment obligation (principal or interest). While in forbearance status, interest continues to accrue and is capitalized to principal when the loan re-enters repayment status. Our forbearance policies include limits on the number of forbearance months granted consecutively and the total number of forbearance months granted over the life of the loan. In some instances, we require good-faith payments before granting forbearance. Exceptions to forbearance policies are permitted when such exceptions are judged to increase the likelihood of collection of the loan. Forbearance as a collection tool is used most effectively when applied based on a customer’s unique situation, including historical information and judgments. We leverage updated customer information and other decision support tools to best determine who will be granted forbearance based on our expectations as to a customer’s ability and willingness to repay their obligation. This strategy is aimed at mitigating the overall risk of the portfolio as well as encouraging cash resolution of delinquent loans.

Forbearance may be granted to customers who are exiting their grace period to provide additional time to obtain employment and income to support their obligations, or to current customers who are faced with a hardship and request forbearance time to provide temporary payment relief. In these circumstances, a customer’s loan is placed into a forbearance status in limited monthly increments and is reflected in the forbearance status at month-end during this time. At the end of their granted forbearance period, the customer will enter repayment status as current and is expected to begin making their scheduled monthly payments on a go-forward basis.

Forbearance may also be granted to customers who are delinquent in their payments. In these circumstances, the forbearance cures the delinquency and the customer is returned to a current repayment status. In more limited instances, delinquent customers will also be granted additional forbearance time.

The table below reflects the historical effectiveness of using forbearance. Our experience has shown that three years after being granted forbearance for the first time, 66 percent of the loans are current, paid in full, or receiving an in-school grace or deferment, and 20 percent have defaulted. The default experience associated with

loans which utilize forbearance is considered in our allowance for loan losses. The number of loans in a forbearance status as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance decreased to 3.5 percent in the second quarter of 2013 compared with 4.3 percent in the year-ago quarter. As of June 30, 2013, 1.7 percent of loans in current status were delinquent as of the end of the prior month, but were granted a forbearance that made them current as of June 30, 2013 (customers made payments on approximately 26 percent of these loans as a prerequisite to being granted forbearance).


Tracking by First Time in Forbearance Compared to All Loans Entering Repayment — Portfolio data through June 30, 2013
	Status distribution 36 months after being granted forbearance for the first time			Status distribution 36 months after entering repayment (all loans)			Status distribution 36 months after entering repayment for loans never entering forbearance
In-school/grace/deferment		9.6	%		9.1	%		5.6	%
Current		50.9			59.2			66.8
Delinquent 31-60 days		3.1			2.0			.4
Delinquent 61-90 days		1.9			1.2			.2
Delinquent greater than 90 days		4.7			2.7			.3
Forbearance		4.0			3.1			—
Defaulted		20.1			11.5			7.5
Paid		5.7			11.2			19.2

Total		100	%		100	%		100	%

The tables below show the composition and status of the Private Education Loan portfolio aged by number of months in active repayment status (months for which a scheduled monthly payment was due). As indicated in the tables, the percentage of loans in forbearance status decreases the longer the loans have been in active repayment status. At June 30, 2013, loans in forbearance status as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance were 6.1 percent for loans that have been in active repayment status for less than 25 months. The percentage drops to 1.4 percent for loans that have been in active repayment status for more than 48 months. Approximately 67 percent of our Private Education Loans in forbearance status has been in active repayment status less than 25 months.


(Dollars in millions) June 30, 2013	Monthly Scheduled Payments Due															Not Yet in Repayment			Total
(Dollars in millions) June 30, 2013	0 to 12			13 to 24			25 to 36			37 to 48			More than 48			Not Yet in Repayment			Total
Loans in-school/grace/deferment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	5,896		$	5,896
Loans in forbearance		584			192			162			96			126			—			1,160
Loans in repayment — current		5,671			4,996			5,303			4,455			8,771			—			29,196
Loans in repayment — delinquent 31-60 days		254			152			137			99			150			—			792
Loans in repayment — delinquent 61-90 days		181			95			86			54			79			—			495
Loans in repayment — delinquent greater than 90 days		442			246			190			118			148			—			1,144

Total	$	7,132		$	5,681		$	5,878		$	4,822		$	9,274		$	5,896			38,683

Unamortized discount																				(752	)
Receivable for partially charged-off loans																				1,334
Allowance for loan losses																				(2,149	)

Total Private Education Loans, net																			$	37,116

Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance		8.2	%		3.4	%		2.8	%		2.0	%		1.4	%		—	%		3.5	%


(Dollars in millions) June 30, 2012	Monthly Scheduled Payments Due															Not Yet in Repayment			Total
(Dollars in millions) June 30, 2012	1 to 12			13 to 24			25 to 36			37 to 48			More than 48			Not Yet in Repayment			Total
Loans in-school/grace/deferment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	6,098		$	6,098
Loans in forbearance		838			214			147			74			95			—			1,368
Loans in repayment — current		6,406			5,847			5,128			3,621			6,648			—			27,650
Loans in repayment — delinquent 31-60 days		478			207			164			87			122			—			1,058
Loans in repayment — delinquent 61-90 days		321			119			93			48			62			—			643
Loans in repayment — delinquent greater than 90 days		706			269			191			94			120			—			1,380

Total	$	8,749		$	6,656		$	5,723		$	3,924		$	7,047		$	6,098			38,197

Unamortized discount																				(834	)
Receivable for partially charged-off loans																				1,277
Allowance for loan losses																				(2,186	)

Total Private Education Loans, net																			$	36,454

Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance		9.6	%		3.2	%		2.6	%		1.9	%		1.3	%		—	%		4.3	%

The table below stratifies the portfolio of Private Education Loans in forbearance by the cumulative number of months the customer has used forbearance as of the dates indicated. As detailed in the table below, 7 percent of loans currently in forbearance have cumulative forbearance of more than 24 months.


	June 30, 2013					June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Forbearance Balance		% of Total			Forbearance Balance		% of Total
Cumulative number of months customer has used forbearance
Up to 12 months	$	883		76	%	$	940		69	%
13 to 24 months		197		17			356		26
More than 24 months		80		7			72		5

Total	$	1,160		100	%	$	1,368		100	%

Private Education Loan Repayment Options

Certain loan programs allow customers to select from a variety of repayment options depending on their loan type and their enrollment/loan status, which include the ability to extend their repayment term or change their monthly payment. The chart below provides the optional repayment offerings in addition to the standard level principal and interest payments as of June 30, 2013.

Loan Program

(Dollars in millions)

Signature and
Other

Smart Option

Career
Training

Total

$ in repayment

$23,724

$6,551

$ 1,352

$31,627

$ in total

28,442

8,841

1,400

38,683

Payment method by enrollment status:

In-school/grace

Deferred ⁽¹⁾

Deferred ⁽¹⁾ ,

interest-only or fixed
$25/month

Interest-only or fixed

$25/month

Repayment

Level principal and

interest or graduated

Level principal and

interest

Level principal and

interest

⁽¹⁾	“Deferred” includes loans for which no payments are required and interest charges are capitalized into the loan balance.

The graduated repayment program that is part of Signature and Other Loans includes an interest-only payment feature that may be selected at the option of the customer. Customers elect to participate in this program at the time they enter repayment following their grace period. This program is available to customers in repayment, after their grace period, who would like a temporary lower payment from the required principal and interest payment amount. Customers participating in this program pay monthly interest with no amortization of their principal balance for up to 48 payments after entering repayment (dependent on the loan product type). The maturity date of the loan is not extended when a customer participates in this program. As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, customers in repayment owing approximately $5.9 billion (19 percent of loans in repayment) and $7.0 billion (23 percent of loans in repayment), respectively, were enrolled in the interest-only program. Of these amounts, 10 percent and 11 percent were non-traditional loans as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Accrued Interest Receivable


	Accrued Interest Receivable
(Dollars in millions)	Total		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Allowance for Uncollectible Interest
June 30, 2013	$	928	$	44	$	69
December 31, 2012	$	904	$	55	$	67
June 30, 2012	$	973	$	52	$	71

FFELP Loan Portfolio Performance

FFELP Loan Delinquencies and Forbearance

The table below presents our FFELP Loan delinquency trends.


	FFELP Loan Delinquencies
	June 30,
	2013						2012
(Dollars in millions)	Balance			%			Balance			%
Loans in-school/grace/deferment ⁽¹⁾	$	15,239					$	21,157
Loans in forbearance ⁽²⁾		15,236						18,357
Loans in repayment and percentage of each status:
Loans current		64,801			84.1	%		76,258			82.9	%
Loans delinquent 31-60 days ⁽³⁾		3,750			4.9			5,239			5.7
Loans delinquent 61-90 days ⁽³⁾		2,156			2.8			2,816			3.1
Loans delinquent greater than 90 days ⁽³⁾		6,356			8.2			7,685			8.3

Total FFELP Loans in repayment		77,063			100	%		91,998			100	%

Total FFELP Loans, gross		107,538						131,512
FFELP Loan unamortized premium		1,086						1,494

Total FFELP Loans		108,624						133,006
FFELP Loan allowance for losses		(133	)					(173	)

FFELP Loans, net	$	108,491					$	132,833

Percentage of FFELP Loans in repayment					71.7	%					70.0	%

Delinquencies as a percentage of FFELP Loans in repayment					15.9	%					17.1	%

FFELP Loans in forbearance as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance					16.5	%					16.6	%

⁽¹⁾

Loans for customers who may still be attending school or engaging in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on the loans, e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation, as well as loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making payments due to hardship or other factors.

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.

Allowance for FFELP Loan Losses

The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for FFELP Loan losses.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Allowance at beginning of period		147			180			159			187
Provision for FFELP Loan losses		14			18			30			36
Charge-offs		(20	)		(23	)		(42	)		(46	)
Student loan sales		(8	)		(2	)		(14	)		(4	)

Allowance at end of period	$	133		$	173		$	133		$	173

Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment (annualized)		.10	%		.10	%		.10	%		.10	%
Charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment and forbearance (annualized)		.08	%		.08	%		.09	%		.08	%
Allowance as a percentage of ending total loans, gross		.12	%		.13	%		.12	%		.13	%
Allowance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment		.17	%		.19	%		.17	%		.19	%
Allowance coverage of charge-offs (annualized)		1.7			1.8			1.6			1.9
Ending total loans, gross	$	107,538		$	131,512		$	107,538		$	131,512
Average loans in repayment	$	81,423		$	92,436		$	84,323		$	92,793
Ending loans in repayment	$	77,063		$	91,998		$	77,063		$	91,998

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Funding and Liquidity Risk Management

The following “Liquidity and Capital Resources” discussion concentrates on our Consumer Lending and FFELP Loans segments. Our Business Services and Other segments require minimal capital and funding.

We define liquidity risk as the potential inability to meet our obligations when they become due without incurring unacceptable losses, such as the ability to fund liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, or invest in future asset growth and business operations at reasonable market rates, as well as the potential inability to fund Private Education Loan originations. Our three primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to meet our funding needs for our businesses throughout market cycles, including during periods of financial stress and to avoid any mismatch between the maturity of assets and liabilities, our ongoing ability to fund originations of Private Education Loans and servicing our indebtedness and bank deposits. To achieve these objectives we analyze and monitor our liquidity needs, maintain excess liquidity and access diverse funding sources including the issuance of unsecured debt, the issuance of secured debt primarily through asset-backed securitizations and/or other financing facilities and through deposits at the Bank.

We define liquidity as cash and high-quality liquid securities that we can use to meet our funding requirements. Our primary liquidity risk relates to our ability to fund new originations and raise replacement funding at a reasonable cost as our unsecured debt and bank deposits mature. In addition, we must continue to obtain funding at reasonable rates to meet our other business obligations and to continue to grow our business. Key risks associated with our liquidity relate to our ability to access the capital markets and bank deposits and access them at reasonable rates. This ability may be affected by our credit ratings, as well as the overall availability of funding sources in the marketplace. In addition, credit ratings may be important to customers or counterparties when we compete in certain markets and when we seek to engage in certain transactions, including over-the-counter derivatives.

Credit ratings and outlooks are opinions subject to ongoing review by the ratings agencies and may change from time to time based on our financial performance, industry dynamics and other factors. Other factors that

influence our credit ratings include the ratings agencies’ assessment of the general operating environment, our relative positions in the markets in which we compete, reputation, liquidity position, the level and volatility of earnings, corporate governance and risk management policies, capital position and capital management practices. A negative change in our credit rating could have a negative effect on our liquidity because it would raise the cost and availability of funding and potentially require additional cash collateral or restrict cash currently held as collateral on existing borrowings or derivative collateral arrangements. It is our objective to improve our credit ratings so that we can continue to efficiently access the capital markets even in difficult economic and market conditions.

We expect to fund our ongoing liquidity needs, including the origination of new Private Education Loans and the repayment of $3.1 billion of senior unsecured notes that mature in the next twelve months, primarily through our current cash and investment portfolio, the issuance of additional bank deposits and unsecured debt, the predictable operating cash flows provided by earnings, the repayment of principal on unencumbered student loan assets and the distributions from our securitization trusts (including servicing fees which are priority payments within the trusts). We may also draw down on our secured FFELP facilities.

Currently, new Private Education Loan originations are initially funded through deposits and subsequently securitized to term. We have $1.6 billion of cash at the Bank as of June 30, 2013 available to fund future originations. We no longer originate FFELP Loans and therefore no longer have liquidity requirements for new FFELP Loan originations.

We will continue to opportunistically purchase FFELP Loan portfolios from others. On June 10, 2013, we closed on a new $6.8 billion credit facility that matures in June 2014, to facilitate the term securitization of FFELP Loans. The facility was used in June 2013 to refinance all of the FFELP Loans previously financed through the ED Conduit Program. As a result, we ended our participation in the ED Conduit Program prior to the January 19, 2014 maturity date.

Sources of Liquidity and Available Capacity

Ending Balances


(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Sources of primary liquidity:
Unrestricted cash and liquid investments:
Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries	$	1,805	$	2,376
Sallie Mae Bank ⁽¹⁾		1,595		1,598

Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments	$	3,400	$	3,974

Unencumbered FFELP Loans	$	2,064	$	1,656

Average Balances


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Sources of primary liquidity:
Unrestricted cash and liquid investments:
Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries	$	2,250	$	2,584	$	2,534	$	2,120
Sallie Mae Bank ⁽¹⁾		1,692		660		1,461		770

Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments	$	3,942	$	3,244	$	3,995	$	2,890

Unencumbered FFELP Loans	$	1,889	$	1,277	$	1,792	$	1,178

(1)	This amount will be used primarily to originate or acquire student loans at the Bank. See discussion below on restrictions on the Bank to pay dividends.

Liquidity may also be available under secured credit facilities to the extent we have eligible collateral and capacity available. Maximum borrowing capacity under the FFELP ABCP Facilities and FHLB-DM Facility will vary and be subject to each agreement’s borrowing conditions, including, among others, facility size, current usage and availability of qualifying collateral from unencumbered FFELP Loans. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the maximum additional capacity under these facilities was $11.9 billion and $11.8 billion, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the average maximum additional capacity under these facilities was $11.1 billion and $10.7 billion, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the average maximum additional capacity under these facilities was $10.9 billion and $11.4 billion, respectively.

We also hold a number of other unencumbered assets, consisting primarily of Private Education Loans and other assets. Total unencumbered student loans, net, comprised $12.7 billion of our unencumbered assets of which $10.7 billion and $2.0 billion related to Private Education Loans, net and FFELP Loans, net, respectively. At June 30, 2013, we had a total of $21.0 billion of unencumbered assets inclusive of those described above as sources of primary liquidity and exclusive of goodwill and acquired intangible assets.

The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the laws of Utah and the regulations of the FDIC. Generally, under Utah’s industrial bank laws and regulations as well as FDIC regulations, the Bank may pay dividends from its net profits without regulatory approval if, following the payment of the dividend, the Bank’s capital and surplus would not be impaired. While applicable Utah and FDIC regulations differ in approach as to determinations of impairment of capital and surplus, neither method of determination has historically required the Bank to obtain consent to the payment of dividends. The Bank paid no dividends for the three months ended June 30, 2013. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Bank paid dividends of $220 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Bank paid dividends of $120 million and $270 million, respectively.

For further discussion of our various sources of liquidity, such as the FFELP ABCP Facilities, the Bank, our continued access to the ABS market, our asset-backed financing facilities, the lending agreement we entered into with the FHLB-DM and our issuance of unsecured debt, see “Note 6 — Borrowings” in our 2012 Form 10-K.

The following table reconciles encumbered and unencumbered assets and their net impact on total tangible equity.


(Dollars in billions)	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Net assets of consolidated variable interest entities (encumbered assets) — FFELP Loans	$	5.8		$	6.6
Net assets of consolidated variable interest entities (encumbered assets) — Private Education Loans		6.5			6.6
Tangible unencumbered assets ⁽¹⁾		21.0			21.2
Unsecured debt		(25.5	)		(26.7	)
Mark-to-market on unsecured hedged debt ⁽²⁾		(1.0	)		(1.7	)
Other liabilities, net		(1.8	)		(1.4	)

Total tangible equity	$	5.0		$	4.6

⁽¹⁾

Excludes goodwill and acquired intangible assets.

⁽²⁾

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were $1.0 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively, of net gains on derivatives hedging this debt in unencumbered assets, which partially offset these losses.

Transactions during the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

The following financing transactions have taken place in the first six months of 2013:

Unsecured Financings:

•

January 28, 2013 — issued $1.5 billion senior unsecured bonds.

FFELP Financings:

•

February 14, 2013 — issued $1.2 billion FFELP ABS.

•

April 11, 2013 — issued $1.2 billion FFELP ABS.

•

June 20, 2013 — issued $1.2 billion FFELP ABS.

Private Education Loan Financings:

•

January 31, 2013 — issued $0.3 billion Private Education Loan ABS funding a portfolio of previously issued auction rate securities that we had reacquired.

•

March 7, 2013 — issued $1.1 billion Private Education Loan ABS.

•

May 2, 2013 — issued $1.1 billion Private Education Loan ABS.

FFELP ABCP Facility

On June 10, 2013, we closed on a new $6.8 billion credit facility that matures in June 2014 to facilitate the term securitization of FFELP Loans. The facility was used in June 2013 to refinance all of the FFELP Loans previously financed through the ED Conduit Program. As a result, we ended our participation in the ED Conduit Program prior to the January 19, 2014 maturity date.

Shareholder Distributions

In second-quarter 2013, we paid a common stock dividend of $0.15 per share.

We repurchased 9 million shares of common stock for $201 million in the second quarter of 2013, or an aggregate of 19 million shares for $400 million in the first half of 2013, fully utilizing our February 2013 share repurchase program authorization. In July 2013, we authorized $400 million to be utilized in a new common share repurchase program that does not have an expiration date.

2013 Sales of FFELP Loan Securitization Trust Residual Interests

Recent Third-Quarter 2013 Transactions

On July 17, we closed on a $1.1 billion ABCP borrowing facility that matures on August 15, 2015. The facility will be used to fund the call and redemption of our SLM 2009-D Private Education Loan Trust ABS, anticipated to occur on August 15, 2013.

Counterparty Exposure

Counterparty exposure related to financial instruments arises from the risk that a lending, investment or derivative counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to us. Risks associated with our lending portfolio are discussed in Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition — Consumer Lending Portfolio Performance” and “— FFELP Loan Portfolio Performance.”

Our investment portfolio is composed of very short-term securities issued by a diversified group of highly rated issuers, limiting our counterparty exposure. Additionally, our investing activity is governed by Board approved limits on the amount that is allowed to be invested with any one issuer based on the credit rating of the issuer, further minimizing our counterparty exposure. Counterparty credit risk is considered when valuing investments and considering impairment.

Related to derivative transactions, protection against counterparty risk is generally provided by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) Credit Support Annexes (“CSAs”). CSAs require a counterparty to post collateral if a potential default would expose the other party to a loss. All derivative contracts entered into by SLM Corporation and the Bank are covered under such agreements and require collateral to be exchanged based on the net fair value of derivatives with each counterparty. Our securitization trusts require collateral in all cases if the counterparty’s credit rating is withdrawn or downgraded below a certain level. Additionally, securitizations involving foreign currency notes issued after November 2005 also require the counterparty to post collateral to the trust based on the fair value of the derivative, regardless of credit rating. The trusts are not required to post collateral to the counterparties. In all cases, our exposure is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position net of any collateral we are holding. We consider counterparties’ credit risk when determining the fair value of derivative positions on our exposure net of collateral.

We have liquidity exposure related to collateral movements between us and our derivative counterparties. Movements in the value of the derivatives, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rate and foreign exchange rates, may require us to return cash collateral held or may require us to access primary liquidity to post collateral to counterparties. If our credit ratings are downgraded from current levels, we may be required to segregate additional unrestricted cash collateral into restricted accounts.

The table below highlights exposure related to our derivative counterparties at June 30, 2013.


(Dollars in millions)	SLM Corporation and Sallie Mae Bank Contracts			Securitization Trust Contracts
Exposure, net of collateral ⁽¹⁾	$	114		$	610
Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P AA- or Moody’s Aa3		94	%		31	%
Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P A- or Moody’s A3		0	%		0	%

⁽¹⁾

Recent turmoil in the European markets has led to increased disclosure of exposure to those markets. Our securitization trusts had total net exposure of $533 million related to financial institutions located in France; of this amount, $418 million carries a guaranty from the French government. The total exposure relates to $5.7 billion notional amount of cross-currency interest rate swaps held in our securitization trusts, of which $3.5 billion notional amount carries a guaranty from the French government. Counterparties to the cross currency interest rate swaps are required to post collateral when their credit rating is withdrawn or downgraded below a certain level. As of June 30, 2013, no collateral was required to be posted and we are not holding any collateral related to these contracts. Adjustments are made to our derivative valuations for counterparty credit risk. The adjustments made at June 30, 2013 related to derivatives with French financial institutions (including those that carry a guaranty from the French government) decreased the derivative asset value by $72 million. Credit risks for all derivative counterparties are assessed internally on a continual basis.

“Core Earnings” Basis Borrowings

The following tables present the ending balances of our “Core Earnings” basis borrowings at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and average balances and average interest rates of our “Core Earnings” basis borrowings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The average interest rates include derivatives that are economically hedging the underlying debt but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. (See “‘Core Earnings’ — Definition and Limitations — Differences between ‘Core Earnings’ and GAAP — Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) on Derivative and Hedging Activities” of this Item 2).

Ending Balances


	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Short Term		Long Term		Total		Short Term		Long Term		Total
Unsecured borrowings:
Senior unsecured debt	$	3,063	$	14,433	$	17,496	$	2,319	$	15,446	$	17,765
Brokered deposits		1,298		2,247		3,545		979		3,088		4,067
Retail and other deposits		3,686		—		3,686		3,247		—		3,247
Other ⁽¹⁾		825		—		825		1,609		—		1,609

Total unsecured borrowings		8,872		16,680		25,552		8,154		18,534		26,688

Secured borrowings:
FFELP Loan securitizations		—		92,428		92,428		—		105,525		105,525
Private Education Loan securitizations		—		20,594		20,594		—		19,656		19,656
ED Conduit Program Facility		—		—		—		9,551		—		9,551
FFELP ABCP Facilities		6,524		2,816		9,340		—		4,154		4,154
Private Education Loan ABCP Facility		—		—		—		—		1,070		1,070
Acquisition financing ⁽²⁾		—		505		505		—		673		673
FHLB-DM Facility		1,115		1,220		2,335		2,100		—		2,100

Total secured borrowings		7,639		117,563		125,202		11,651		131,078		142,729

Total “Core Earnings” basis		16,511		134,243		150,754		19,805		149,612		169,417
Hedge accounting adjustments		47		1,636		1,683		51		2,789		2,840

Total GAAP basis	$	16,558	$	135,879	$	152,437	$	19,856	$	152,401	$	172,257

(1)	“Other” primarily consists of the obligation to return cash collateral held related to derivative exposure.

(2)	Relates to the acquisition of $25 billion of student loans at the end of 2010.

Secured borrowings comprised 83 percent and 84 percent of our “Core Earnings” basis debt outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Average Balances


	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013					2012					2013					2012
(Dollars in millions)	Average Balance		Average Rate			Average Balance		Average Rate			Average Balance		Average Rate			Average Balance		Average Rate
Unsecured borrowings:
Senior unsecured debt	$	17,848		3.22	%	$	18,327		2.94	%	$	18,085		3.19	%	$	18,165		2.91	%
Brokered deposits		3,784		1.51			2,934		1.93			3,897		1.53			3,224		2.01
Retail and other deposits		3,661		.78			2,307		.82			3,601		.81			2,295		.89
Other ⁽¹⁾		1,177		.13			1,367		.16			1,285		.18			1,384		.13

Total unsecured borrowings		26,470		2.50			24,935		2.47			26,868		2.49			25,068		2.45

Secured borrowings:
FFELP Loan securitizations		96,656		.98			107,008		1.12			99,578		.97			107,119		1.13
Private Education Loan securitizations		20,600		2.05			19,212		2.11			20,159		2.06			18,895		2.10
ED Conduit Program Facility		5,734		.95			17,999		.82			7,083		.94			19,257		.81
FFELP ABCP Facilities		5,012		.96			5,364		.96			4,739		.98			4,691		1.06
Private Education Loan ABCP Facility		183		2.48			2,156		1.90			549		1.86			2,395		1.79
Acquisition financing ⁽²⁾		524		4.79			824		4.83			563		4.79			848		4.84
FHLB-DM Facility		2,113		.25			1,274		.36			2,106		.28			1,172		.33

Total secured borrowings		130,822		1.15			153,837		1.23			134,777		1.14			154,377		1.23

Total	$	157,292		1.38	%	$	178,772		1.40	%	$	161,645		1.37	%	$	179,445		1.40	%

“Core Earnings” average balance and rate	$	157,292		1.38	%	$	178,772		1.40	%	$	161,645		1.37	%	$	179,445		1.40	%
Adjustment for GAAP accounting treatment		—		.03			—		.08			—		.03			—		.08

GAAP basis average balance and rate	$	157,292		1.41	%	$	178,772		1.48	%	$	161,645		1.40	%	$	179,445		1.48	%

(1)	“Other” primarily consists of the obligation to return cash collateral held related to derivative exposure.

(2)	Relates to the acquisition of $25 billion of student loans at the end of 2010.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. A discussion of our critical accounting policies, which include allowance for loan losses, premium and discount amortization related to our loan portfolio, fair value measurement, transfers of financial assets and the VIE consolidation model, derivative accounting and goodwill and intangible assets can be found in our 2012 Form 10-K. There were no significant changes to these critical accounting policies during the first half of 2013.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

Our interest rate risk management seeks to limit the impact of short-term movements in interest rates on our results of operations and financial position. The following tables summarize the potential effect on earnings over the next 12 months and the potential effect on fair values of balance sheet assets and liabilities at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, based upon a sensitivity analysis performed by management assuming a hypothetical increase in market interest rates of 100 basis points and 300 basis points while funding spreads remain constant. Additionally, as it relates to the effect on earnings, a sensitivity analysis was performed assuming the funding index increases 25 basis points while holding the asset index constant, if the funding index is different than the asset index. The earnings sensitivity is applied only to financial assets and liabilities, including hedging instruments that existed at the balance sheet date and does not take into account new assets, liabilities or hedging instruments that may arise in 2013.


	As of June 30, 2013									As of June 30, 2012
	Impact on Annual Earnings If:									Impact on Annual Earnings If:
	Interest Rates						Funding Indices			Interest Rates					Funding Indices
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	Increase 100 Basis Points			Increase 300 Basis Points			Increase 25 Basis Points ⁽¹⁾			Increase 100 Basis Points			Increase 300 Basis Points		Increase 25 Basis Points ⁽¹⁾
Effect on Earnings:
Change in pre-tax net income before unrealized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities	$	(53	)	$	(42	)	$	(246	)	$	(18	)	$	24	$	(334	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities		293			476			(1	)		499			848		(9	)

Increase in net income before taxes	$	240		$	434		$	(247	)	$	481		$	872	$	(343	)

Increase in diluted earnings per common share	$	.53		$	.96		$	(.55	)	$	.96		$	1.75	$	(.69	)

⁽¹⁾	If an asset is not funded with the same index/frequency reset of the asset then it is assumed the funding index increases 25 basis points while holding the asset index constant.


	At June 30, 2013
			Interest Rates:
			Change from Increase of 100 Basis Points						Change from Increase of 300 Basis Points
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		$			%			$			%
Effect on Fair Values:
Assets
FFELP Loans	$	108,033	$	(626	)		(1	)%	$	(1,255	)		(1	)%
Private Education Loans		36,531		—			—			—			—
Other earning assets		8,373		—			—			(1	)		—
Other assets		7,487		(348	)		(5	)		(648	)		(9	)%

Total assets gain/(loss)	$	160,424	$	(974	)		(1	)%	$	(1,904	)		(1	)%

Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities	$	148,046	$	(768	)		(1	)%	$	(2,133	)		(1	)%
Other liabilities		3,597		(95	)		(3	)		406			11

Total liabilities (gain)/loss	$	151,643	$	(863	)		(1	)%	$	(1,727	)		(1	)%


	At December 31, 2012
			Interest Rates:
			Change from Increase of 100 Basis Points						Change from Increase of 300 Basis Points
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		$			%			$			%
Effect on Fair Values:
Assets
FFELP Loans	$	125,042	$	(738	)		(1	)%	$	(1,438	)		(1	)%
Private Education Loans		36,081		—			—			—			—
Other earning assets		9,994		—			—			(1	)		—
Other assets		8,721		(560	)		(6	)		(1,187	)		(14	)%

Total assets gain/(loss)	$	179,838	$	(1,298	)		(1	)%	$	(2,626	)		(1	)%

Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities	$	166,071	$	(829	)		—	%	$	(2,298	)		(1	)%
Other liabilities		3,937		(422	)		(11	)		(274	)		(7	)

Total liabilities (gain)/loss	$	170,008	$	(1,251	)		(1	)%	$	(2,572	)		(2	)%

A primary objective in our funding is to minimize our sensitivity to changing interest rates by generally funding our floating rate student loan portfolio with floating rate debt. However, due to the ability of some FFELP loans to earn Floor Income, we can have a fixed versus floating mismatch in funding if the student loan earns at the fixed borrower rate and the funding remains floating. In addition, we can have a mismatch in the index (including the frequency of reset) of floating rate debt versus floating rate assets.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, certain FFELP Loans were earning Floor Income and we locked in a portion of that Floor Income through the use of Floor Income contracts. The result of these hedging transactions was to convert a portion of the fixed rate nature of student loans to variable rate, and to fix the relative spread between the student loan asset rate and the variable rate liability.

In the preceding tables, under the scenario where interest rates increase 100 and 300 basis points, the change in pre-tax net income before the unrealized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities is primarily due to

the impact of (i) our unhedged loans being in a fixed-rate mode due to Floor Income, while being funded with variable debt in low interest rate environments; and (ii) a portion of our variable assets being funded with fixed rate liabilities and equity. Item (i) will generally cause income to decrease when interest rates increase from a low interest rate environment, whereas item (ii) will generally offset this decrease.

Under the scenario in the tables above labeled “Impact on Annual Earnings If: Funding Indices Increase 25 Basis Points,” the main driver of the decrease in pre-tax income before unrealized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities in both the June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 analyses is the result of one-month LIBOR-indexed FFELP Loans (loans formerly indexed to commercial paper) being funded with three-month LIBOR and other non-discrete indexed liabilities. See “Asset and Liability Funding Gap” of this Item 7A for a further discussion. Increasing the spread between indices will also impact the unrealized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities as it relates to basis swaps that hedge the mismatch between the asset and funding indices.

In addition to interest rate risk addressed in the preceding tables, we are also exposed to risks related to foreign currency exchange rates. Foreign currency exchange risk is primarily the result of foreign currency denominated debt issued by us. When we issue foreign denominated corporate unsecured and securitization debt, our policy is to use cross currency interest rate swaps to swap all foreign currency denominated debt payments (fixed and floating) to U.S. dollar LIBOR using a fixed exchange rate. In the tables above, there would be an immaterial impact on earnings if exchange rates were to decrease or increase, due to the terms of the hedging instrument and hedged items matching. The balance sheet interest bearing liabilities would be affected by a change in exchange rates; however, the change would be materially offset by the cross currency interest rate swaps in other assets or other liabilities. In the current economic environment, volatility in the spread between spot and forward foreign exchange rates has resulted in material mark-to-market impacts to current-period earnings which have not been factored into the above analysis. The earnings impact is noncash, and at maturity of the instruments the cumulative mark-to-market impact will be zero.

Asset and Liability Funding Gap

The tables below present our assets and liabilities (funding) arranged by underlying indices as of June 30, 2013. In the following GAAP presentation, the funding gap only includes derivatives that qualify as effective hedges (those derivatives which are reflected in net interest margin, as opposed to those reflected in the “gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net” line on the consolidated statements of income). The difference between the asset and the funding is the funding gap for the specified index. This represents our exposure to interest rate risk in the form of basis risk and repricing risk, which is the risk that the different indices may reset at different frequencies or may not move in the same direction or at the same magnitude.

Management analyzes interest rate risk and in doing so includes all derivatives that are economically hedging our debt whether they qualify as effective hedges or not (“Core Earnings” basis). Accordingly, we are also presenting the asset and liability funding gap on a “Core Earnings” basis in the table that follows the GAAP presentation.

GAAP-Basis


(Dollars in billions) Index	Frequency of Variable Resets	Assets ⁽¹⁾		Funding ⁽²⁾		Funding Gap
3-month Treasury bill	weekly	$	5.7	$	—	$	5.7
Prime	annual		0.6		—		0.6
Prime	quarterly		4.1		—		4.1
Prime	monthly		18.6		—		18.6
Prime	daily		—		1.2		(1.2	)
PLUS Index	annual		0.4		—		0.4
3-month LIBOR	daily		—		—		—
3-month LIBOR	quarterly		—		89.7		(89.7	)
1-month LIBOR	monthly		12.9		34.1		(21.2	)
1-month LIBOR daily	daily		101.9		—		101.9
CMT/CPI Index	monthly/quarterly		—		1.3		(1.3	)
Non-Discrete reset ⁽³⁾	monthly		—		14.5		(14.5	)
Non-Discrete reset ⁽⁴⁾	daily/weekly		8.3		4.5		3.8
Fixed Rate ⁽⁵⁾			9.0		16.2		(7.2	)

Total		$	161.5	$	161.5	$	—

⁽¹⁾

FFELP Loans of $46.6 billion ($43.2 billion LIBOR index and $3.4 billion Treasury bill index) are currently earning a fixed rate of interest as a result of the low interest rate environment.

⁽²⁾

Funding (by index) includes all derivatives that qualify as hedges.

⁽³⁾

Funding consists of auction rate securities, the ABCP Facilities and the FHLB-DM Facility.

⁽⁴⁾

Assets include restricted and unrestricted cash equivalents and other overnight type instruments. Funding includes retail and other deposits and the obligation to return cash collateral held related to derivatives exposures.

⁽⁵⁾

Assets include receivables and other assets (including goodwill and acquired intangibles). Funding includes other liabilities and stockholders’ equity (excluding series B Preferred Stock).

The “Funding Gaps” in the above table are primarily interest rate mismatches in short-term indices between our assets and liabilities. We address this issue typically through the use of basis swaps that typically convert quarterly reset three-month LIBOR to other indices that are more correlated to our asset indices. These basis swaps do not qualify as effective hedges and as a result the effect on the funding index is not included in our interest margin and is therefore excluded from the GAAP presentation.

“Core Earnings” Basis


(Dollars in billions) Index	Frequency of Variable Resets	Assets ⁽¹⁾		Funding ⁽²⁾		Funding Gap
3-month Treasury bill	weekly	$	5.7	$	—	$	5.7
Prime	annual		0.6		—		0.6
Prime	quarterly		4.1		—		4.1
Prime	monthly		18.6		4.5		14.1
Prime	daily		—		1.2		(1.2	)
PLUS Index	annual		0.4		—		0.4
3-month LIBOR	daily		—		6.0		(6.0	)
3-month LIBOR	quarterly		—		67.8		(67.8	)
1-month LIBOR	monthly		12.9		44.1		(31.2	)
1-month LIBOR	daily		101.9		5.0		96.9
Non-Discrete reset ⁽³⁾	monthly		—		14.5		(14.5	)
Non-Discrete reset ⁽⁴⁾	daily/weekly		8.3		4.5		3.8
Fixed Rate ⁽⁵⁾			7.0		11.9		(4.9	)

Total		$	159.5	$	159.5	$	—

⁽¹⁾

FFELP Loans of $14.9 billion ($14.6 billion LIBOR index and $0.3 billion Treasury bill index) are currently earning a fixed rate of interest as a result of the low interest rate environment.

⁽²⁾

Funding (by index) includes all derivatives that management considers economic hedges of interest rate risk and reflects how we internally manage our interest rate exposure.

⁽³⁾

Funding consists of auction rate securities, the ABCP Facilities and the FHLB-DM Facility.

⁽⁴⁾

⁽⁵⁾

Assets include receivables and other assets (including goodwill and acquired intangibles). Funding includes other liabilities and stockholders’ equity (excluding series B Preferred Stock).

We use interest rate swaps and other derivatives to achieve our risk management objectives. Our asset liability management strategy is to match assets with debt (in combination with derivatives) that have the same underlying index and reset frequency or, when economical, have interest rate characteristics that we believe are highly correlated. The use of funding with index types and reset frequencies that are different from our assets exposes us to interest rate risk in the form of basis and repricing risk. This could result in our cost of funds not moving in the same direction or with the same magnitude as the yield on our assets. While we believe this risk is low, as all of these indices are short-term with rate movements that are highly correlated over a long period of time, market disruptions (which have occurred in recent years) can lead to a temporary divergence between indices resulting in a negative impact to our earnings.

Weighted Average Life

The following table reflects the weighted average life of our earning assets and liabilities at June 30, 2013.


(Averages in Years)	Weighted Average Life
Earning assets
Student loans		7.6
Other loans		7.2
Cash and investments		0.1

Total earning assets		7.2

Borrowings
Short-term borrowings		0.5
Long-term borrowings		6.6

Total borrowings		5.9

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief principal executive and principal financial officers, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 30, 2013. Based on this evaluation, our chief principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that, as of June 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief principal executive and principal financial officers as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.”

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We and our subsidiaries and affiliates are subject to various claims, lawsuits and other actions that arise in the normal course of business. Most of these matters are claims by borrowers disputing the manner in which their loans have been processed or the accuracy of our reports to credit bureaus. In addition, our collections subsidiaries are routinely named in individual plaintiff or class action lawsuits in which the plaintiffs allege that those subsidiaries have violated a federal or state law in the process of collecting their accounts. We believe that these claims, lawsuits and other actions will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Finally, from time to time, we and our subsidiaries and affiliates receive information and document requests from state attorneys general, legislative committees and administrative agencies concerning certain business practices. Our practice has been and continues to be to cooperate with these bodies and to be responsive to any such requests.

For a description of these items and other litigation to which we are a party, see our 2012 Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Readers should carefully consider the following risk factors, in addition to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our 2012 Form 10-K.

Our businesses are regulated by various state and federal laws and regulations, and our failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in significant costs, sanctions, litigation or the loss of insurance and guarantees on affected FFELP Loans.

The Bank is subject to state and FDIC regulation, oversight and regular examination, including by the CFPB. The FDIC and state regulators have the authority to impose fines, penalties or other limitations on the Bank’s operations should they conclude that its operations are not compliant with applicable laws and regulations. At the time of this filing, the Bank is subject to a 2008 cease and desist order issued jointly by the FDIC and the UDFI for weaknesses in its compliance function. Many of these weaknesses have previously been attributed to the Bank’s oversight of significant activities performed outside the Bank by Company affiliates.

In July 2013, the FDIC notified the Bank that it plans to replace the existing cease and desist order with a new formal enforcement action that will more specifically address certain cited violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, including with respect to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and its implementing regulation, Regulation B, which could include civil money penalties and restitution obligations. The Bank has not been notified by the UDFI that it intends to join the FDIC in issuing the new enforcement action. We have made and continue to make changes to the Bank’s oversight of significant activities performed outside the Bank by Company affiliates, including in connection with our pursuit of a strategic plan to separate our existing organization into two publicly traded companies. We could be required to, or otherwise determine to, make further changes to the business practices and products of the Bank and our other affiliates to respond to regulatory concerns. Such changes to the business practices and products of the Bank or our other affiliates in response to current or future regulatory concerns and enforcement, or other action by the above referenced or other regulators, which may include civil money penalties and require restitution to customers, could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The proposed separation of our current business into two, separate, publicly traded entities is contingent upon the satisfaction of a number of conditions, which may not be consummated on the terms or timeline currently contemplated or may not achieve the intended results. Though we are unaware of any applicable requirement

that the FDIC or UDFI approve of the proposed separation, we can give no assurances that they or other consumer or financial regulators will not affect the timing, manner or terms of the separation.

We are currently pursuing a strategic plan to separate our existing organization into two publicly traded companies, an education loan management company and a consumer banking company. It is expected the separation, if completed, will occur in the first half of 2014. Our ability to timely effect the separation is subject to several conditions, including, among others, the receipt of a favorable private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service and the SEC declaring effective a registration statement relating to the securities of the separated entity. We cannot assure that we will be able to complete the separation in a timely fashion, if at all. For these and other reasons, the separation may not be completed on the terms or timeline contemplated. Further, if the separation is completed, it may not achieve the intended results. Any such difficulties could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

The Bank is subject to state and FDIC regulation, oversight and regular examination and it remains subject to a cease and desist order originally issued in 2008 citing weaknesses in its compliance function. Many of these weaknesses have previously been attributed to the Bank’s oversight of significant activities performed outside the Bank by Company affiliates-a condition that we are seeking, in part, to eliminate through the separation of our current business into two companies. There can be no assurance the FDIC or UDFI will approve of our efforts to operationalize the Bank and minimize the number of activities performed by Company affiliates or acknowledge these efforts under the existing cease and desist order. Our failure to comply with various laws and regulations or with the terms of the cease and desist order, or any assertion of any such failure that is raised by any regulator could result in litigation expenses, restitution, fines, business sanctions, and limitations on our ability to fund Private Education Loans, which are currently funded by deposits raised by the Bank, or restrictions on the operations of the Bank. Furthermore, the FDIC or the UDFI could require us to undertake significant changes to the manner in which we currently provide services to the Bank through our affiliates. If we are unable to demonstrate to the FDIC and UDFI the benefits of the design and execution of the proposed separation, these changes could come at significant cost and impede or delay our ability to complete the separation of our business in the time or manner we currently estimate. The imposition of fines, penalties or other limitations on the Bank’s business or our ability to complete the separation could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Share Repurchases

The following table provides information relating to our purchase of shares of our common stock in the three months ended June 30, 2013.


(In millions, except per share data)	Total Number of Shares Purchased ⁽¹⁾		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs ⁽²⁾		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under Publicly Announced Plans or Programs ⁽²⁾
Period:
April 1 — April 30, 2013		4.1	$	20.29		3.7	$	126
May 1 — May 31, 2013		.3		22.31		—		126
June 1 — June 30, 2013		7.7		23.18		5.4		—

Total second-quarter 2013		12.1	$	22.17		9.1

⁽¹⁾

The total number of shares purchased includes: (i) shares purchased under the stock repurchase program discussed below, and (ii) shares of our common stock tendered to us to satisfy the exercise price in connection with cashless exercise of stock options, and tax withholding obligations in connection with exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units.

⁽²⁾	In February 2013, our board of directors authorized us to purchase up to $400 million of shares of our common stock. An additional $400 million of purchases was authorized in July 2013.

The closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 28, 2013 was $22.86.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

Nothing to report.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Nothing to report.

Item 5.

Other Information

Nothing to report.

Item 6.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are furnished or filed, as applicable:


10.1		Agreement and Release, dated May 29, 2013, by and between SLM Corporation and Albert L. Lord†
12.1		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
31.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

†	Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


SLM CORPORATION (Registrant)

By:		/s/ JOSEPH A. DEPAULO
		Joseph A. DePaulo
		Executive Vice President - Banking and Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: August 5, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements Item 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 4. Controls and Procedures Part II. Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Item 5. Other Information Item 6. Exhibits

SLM 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2013