|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
For the fiscal year ended
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)
(
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
| Trading Symbols |
| Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
Simon Property Group, Inc. | ||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act).
Simon Property Group, Inc. | Simon Property Group, L.P. |
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Simon Property Group, Inc. Yes ◻ | Simon Property Group, L.P. Yes ◻ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Simon Property Group, Inc. | Simon Property Group, L.P. |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files).
Simon Property Group, Inc. | Simon Property Group, L.P. |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Simon Property Group, Inc.: | |||
Accelerated filer ◻ | Non-accelerated filer ◻ | Smaller reporting company | |
Emerging growth company | |||
Simon Property Group, L.P.: | |||
Large accelerated filer ◻ | Accelerated filer ◻ | Smaller reporting company | |
Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Simon Property Group, Inc. ◻ | Simon Property Group, L.P. ◻ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Simon Property Group, Inc. Yes | Simon Property Group, L.P. Yes |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12-b of the Act).
Simon Property Group, Inc. Yes ◻ No | Simon Property Group, L.P. Yes ◻ No |
The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of Simon Property Group, Inc. was approximately $
As of January 31, 2022, Simon Property Group, Inc. had
Simon Property Group, L.P. had no publicly-traded voting equity as of June 30, 2021. Simon Property Group, L.P. has no common stock outstanding.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of Simon Property Group, Inc.’s Proxy Statement in connection with its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2021 of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “Simon” mean Simon Property Group, Inc. and references to the “Operating Partnership” mean Simon Property Group, L.P. References to “we,” “us” and “our” mean collectively Simon, the Operating Partnership and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by Simon and/or the Operating Partnership.
Simon is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. We are structured as an umbrella partnership REIT under which substantially all of our business is conducted through the Operating Partnership, Simon’s majority-owned partnership subsidiary, for which Simon is the general partner. As of December 31, 2021, Simon owned an approximate 87.4% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership, with the remaining 12.6% ownership interest owned by limited partners. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, Simon has exclusive control of the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management.
We operate Simon and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of Simon consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, Simon consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, and Simon has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of Simon and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.
We believe that combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of Simon and the Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:
| ● | enhances investors’ understanding of Simon and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business; |
| ● | eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined presentation since substantially all of the disclosure in this report applies to both Simon and the Operating Partnership; and |
| ● | creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports. |
We believe it is important for investors to understand the few differences between Simon and the Operating Partnership in the context of how we operate as a consolidated company. The primary difference is that Simon itself does not conduct business, other than acting as the general partner of the Operating Partnership and issuing equity or equity-related instruments from time to time. In addition, Simon itself does not incur any indebtedness, as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership or entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by the Operating Partnership.
The Operating Partnership holds, directly or indirectly, substantially all of our assets, including our ownership interests in our joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts substantially all of our business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from equity issuances by Simon, which are contributed to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for, in the case of common stock issuances by Simon, common units of partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, or units, or, in the case of preferred stock issuances by Simon, preferred units of partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, or preferred units, the Operating Partnership, directly or indirectly, generates the capital required by our business through its operations, the incurrence of indebtedness, proceeds received from the disposition of certain properties and joint ventures and the issuance of units or preferred units to third parties.
The presentation of stockholders’ equity, partners’ equity and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of Simon and those of the Operating Partnership. The differences between stockholders’ equity and partners’ equity result from differences in the equity issued at the Simon and Operating Partnership levels. The units held by limited partners in the Operating Partnership are accounted for as partners’ equity in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in Simon’s financial statements. The noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements include the interests of unaffiliated partners in various consolidated partnerships. The noncontrolling interests in Simon’s financial statements include the same noncontrolling interests at the Operating Partnership level and, as previously stated, the units held by limited partners of the Operating Partnership. Although classified differently, total equity of Simon and the Operating Partnership is the same.
To help investors understand the differences between Simon and the Operating Partnership, this report provides:
| ● | separate consolidated financial statements for Simon and the Operating Partnership; |
2
| ● | a single set of notes to such consolidated financial statements that includes separate discussions of noncontrolling interests and stockholders’ equity or partners’ equity, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and per share and per unit data, as applicable; |
| ● | a combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section that also includes discrete information related to each entity; and |
| ● | separate Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities sections related to each entity. |
This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for each of Simon and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that Simon and the Operating Partnership are each compliant with Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350. The separate discussions of Simon and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand our results on a consolidated basis and how management operates our business.
In order to highlight the differences between Simon and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for Simon and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to Simon and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosure of Simon and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings of Simon and the Operating Partnership as being “our” actions or holdings. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and joint ventures, holds assets and incurs debt, we believe that references to “we,” “us” or “our” in this context is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and we operate substantially all of our business through the Operating Partnership.
3
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4
Part I
Item 1. | Business |
Simon Property Group, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. REITs will generally not be liable for U.S. federal corporate income taxes as long as they distribute not less than 100% of their REIT taxable income. Simon Property Group, L.P. is our majority-owned Delaware partnership subsidiary that owns all of our real estate properties and other assets. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to Simon mean Simon Property Group, Inc. and references to the Operating Partnership mean Simon Property Group, L.P. References to we, us and our mean collectively Simon, the Operating Partnership and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by Simon and/or the Operating Partnership. According to the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement, the Operating Partnership is required to pay all expenses of Simon.
We own, develop and manage premier shopping, dining, entertainment and mixed-use destinations, which consist primarily of malls, Premium Outlets®, and The Mills®. As of December 31, 2021, we owned or held an interest in 199 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 95 malls, 69 Premium Outlets, 14 Mills, six lifestyle centers, and 15 other retail properties in 37 states and Puerto Rico. We also own an 80% noncontrolling interest in The Taubman Realty Group, LLC, or TRG, which has an interest in 24 regional, super-regional, and outlet malls in the U.S. and Asia. Internationally, as of December 31, 2021, we had ownership interests in 33 Premium Outlets and Designer Outlet properties primarily located in Asia, Europe and Canada. As of December 31, 2021, we also owned a 22.4% equity stake in Klépierre SA, or Klépierre, a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in, shopping centers located in 14 countries in Europe.
For a description of our operational strategies and developments in our business during 2021, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.
Other Policies
The following is a discussion of our investment policies, financing policies, conflict of interest policies and policies with respect to certain other activities. One or more of these policies may be amended or rescinded from time to time without a stockholder vote.
Investment Policies
While we emphasize equity real estate investments, we may also provide secured financing to or invest in equity or debt securities of other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers consistent with Simon’s qualification as a REIT. However, any of these investments would be subject to the percentage ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification. These REIT limitations mean that Simon cannot make an investment that would cause its real estate assets to be less than 75% of its total assets. Simon must also derive at least 75% of its gross income directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including “rents from real property,” dividends from other REITs and, in certain circumstances, interest from certain types of temporary investments. In addition, Simon must also derive at least 95% of its gross income from such real property investments, and from dividends, interest and gains from the sale or dispositions of stock or securities or from other combinations of the foregoing.
Subject to Simon’s REIT limitations, we may invest in the securities of other issuers in connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in real estate. Such an investment would normally be in the form of general or limited partnership or membership interests in special purpose partnerships and limited liability companies that own one or more properties. We may, in the future, acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs, management companies or similar entities where such investments would be consistent with our investment policies. Additionally we have and may in the future make investments in entities engaged in non-real estate activities, primarily through a taxable REIT subsidiary, similar to the investments we currently hold in certain retail operations.
Financing Policies
Because Simon’s REIT qualification requires us to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, we regularly access the debt markets to raise the funds necessary to finance acquisitions, develop and redevelop properties, and refinance maturing debt. We must comply with the covenants contained in our financing agreements that limit our ratio of debt to total assets or market value, as defined. For example, the Operating Partnership’s lines of credit and the indentures
5
for the Operating Partnership’s debt securities contain covenants that restrict the total amount of debt of the Operating Partnership to 65%, or 60% in relation to certain debt, of total assets, as defined under the related agreements, and secured debt to 50% of total assets. In addition, these agreements contain other covenants requiring compliance with financial ratios. Furthermore, the amount of debt that we may incur is limited as a practical matter by our desire to maintain acceptable ratings for the debt securities of the Operating Partnership. We strive to maintain investment grade ratings at all times for various business reasons, including their effect on our ability to access attractive capital, but we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in the future.
If Simon’s Board of Directors determines to seek additional capital, we may raise such capital by offering equity or incurring debt, creating joint ventures with existing ownership interests in properties, entering into joint venture arrangements for new development projects, retaining cash flows or a combination of these methods. If Simon’s Board of Directors determines to raise equity capital, it may, without stockholder approval, issue additional shares of common stock or other capital stock. Simon’s Board of Directors may issue a number of shares up to the amount of our authorized capital or may issue units in any manner and on such terms and for such consideration as it deems appropriate. We may also raise additional capital by issuing common units of partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, or units. Such securities also may include additional classes of Simon’s preferred stock or preferred units of partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, or preferred units, which may be convertible into common stock or units, as the case may be. Existing stockholders and unitholders have no preemptive right to purchase shares or units in any subsequent issuances of securities by us. Any issuance of equity could dilute a stockholder’s investment in Simon or a limited partner’s investment in the Operating Partnership.
We expect most future borrowings will be made through the Operating Partnership or its subsidiaries. We might, however, incur borrowings through other entities that would be reloaned to the Operating Partnership. Borrowings may be in the form of bank borrowings, publicly and privately placed debt instruments, or purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties. Any such indebtedness may be secured or unsecured. Any such indebtedness may also have full or limited recourse to the borrower or be cross-collateralized with other debt, or may be fully or partially guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. We issue unsecured debt securities through the Operating Partnership, but we may issue other debt securities which may be convertible into common or preferred stock or be accompanied by warrants to purchase common or preferred stock. We also may sell or securitize our lease receivables. Although we may borrow to fund the payment of dividends, we currently have no expectation that we will regularly do so.
The Operating Partnership has a $4.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility and a $3.5 billion supplemental unsecured revolving credit facility, or Supplemental Facility, or together, the Credit Facilities. The Credit Facility can be increased in the form of additional commitments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1.0 billion, for a total aggregate size of $5.0 billion, subject to obtaining additional lender commitments and satisfying certain customary conditions precedent. The initial maturity date of the Credit Facility is June 30, 2024. The Credit Facility can be extended for two additional six-month periods to June 30, 2025, at our sole option, subject to satisfying certain customary conditions precedent.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our election, at either (i) (x) for Term Benchmark Loans, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the applicable Local Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate, or the Adjusted TIBOR Rate, (y) for RFR Loans, if denominated in Sterling, SONIA plus a benchmark adjustment and if denominated in Dollars, Daily Simple SOFR plus a benchmark adjustment, or (z) for Daily SOFR Loans, the Adjusted Floating Overnight Daily SOFR Rate, in each case of clauses (x) through (z) above, plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.650% and 1.400% or (ii) for loans denominated in U.S. Dollars only, the base rate (which rate is equal to the greatest of the prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.500% or Adjusted Term SOFR Rate for one month plus 1.000%) (the “Base Rate”), plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.000% and 0.400%. The Credit Facility includes a facility fee determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.100% and 0.300% on the aggregate revolving commitments under the Credit Facility. Based upon our current credit ratings, the interest rate on the Credit Facility is SOFR plus 72.5 basis points, plus a spread adjustment to account for the transition from LIBOR to SOFR.
The Supplemental Facility’s initial borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion may be increased to $4.5 billion during its term. The initial maturity date of the Supplemental Facility is January 31, 2026 and can be extended for an additional year to January 31, 2027 at our sole option, subject to our continued compliance with the terms thereof.
Borrowings under the Supplemental Facility bear interest, at our election, at either (i) (x) for Term Benchmark Loans, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the applicable Local Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate, or the Adjusted TIBOR Rate, (y) for RFR Loans, if denominated in Sterling, SONIA plus a benchmark adjustment and if denominated in Dollars, Daily Simple SOFR plus a benchmark adjustment, or (z) for Daily SOFR Loans, the Adjusted Floating Overnight Daily SOFR Rate, in each case of clauses (x) through (z) above, plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.650%
6
and 1.400% or (ii) for loans denominated in U.S. Dollars only, the base rate (which rate is equal to the greatest of the prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.500% or Adjusted Term SOFR Rate for one month plus 1.000%) (the “Base Rate”), plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.000% and 0.400%. The Supplemental Facility includes a facility fee determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.100% and 0.300% on the aggregate revolving commitments under the Supplemental Facility. Based upon our current credit ratings, the interest rate on the Supplemental Facility is SOFR plus 72.5 basis points, plus a spread adjustment to account for the transition from LIBOR to SOFR.
The Operating Partnership also has available a global unsecured commercial paper note program, or Commercial Paper program, of $2.0 billion, or the non-U.S. dollar equivalent thereof. The Operating Partnership may issue unsecured commercial paper notes, denominated in U.S. dollars, Euro and other currencies. Notes issued in non-U.S. currencies may be issued by one or more subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and are guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Notes are sold under customary terms in the U.S. and Euro commercial paper note markets and rank (either by themselves or as a result of the guarantee described above) pari passu with the Operating Partnership’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The Commercial Paper program is supported by the Credit Facilities and, if necessary or appropriate, we may make one or more draws under the Credit Facilities to pay amounts outstanding from time to time on the Commercial Paper program.
We may also finance our business through the following:
| ● | issuance of shares of common stock or preferred stock or warrants to purchase the same; |
| ● | issuance of additional units; |
| ● | issuance of preferred units; |
| ● | issuance of other securities, including unsecured notes and mortgage debt; |
| ● | draws on our Credit Facilities; |
| ● | borrowings under the Commercial Paper program; or |
| ● | sale or exchange of ownership interests in properties. |
The Operating Partnership may also issue units to contributors of properties or other partnership interests which may permit the contributor to defer tax gain recognition under the Internal Revenue Code.
We do not have a policy limiting the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any particular property.
Mortgage financing instruments, however, typically limit additional indebtedness on such properties. Additionally, the Credit Facilities, our unsecured note indentures and other contracts may limit our ability to borrow and contain limits on mortgage indebtedness we may incur as well as certain financial covenants we must maintain.
Typically, we invest in or form special purpose entities to assist us in obtaining secured permanent financing at attractive terms. Permanent financing may be structured as a mortgage loan on a single property, or on a group of properties, and generally requires us to provide a mortgage lien on the property or properties in favor of an institutional third party, as a joint venture with a third party, or as a securitized financing. For securitized financings, we create special purpose entities to own the properties. These special purpose entities, which are common in the real estate industry, are structured so that they would not be consolidated in a bankruptcy proceeding involving a parent company. We decide upon the structure of the financing based upon the best terms then available to us and whether the proposed financing is consistent with our other business objectives. For accounting purposes, we include the outstanding securitized debt of special purpose entities owning consolidated properties as part of our consolidated indebtedness.
Conflict of Interest Policies
We maintain policies and have entered into agreements designed to reduce or eliminate potential conflicts of interest. Simon has adopted governance principles governing the function, conduct, selection, orientation and duties of its subsidiaries and Simon’s Board of Directors and the Company, as well as written charters for each of the standing Committees of Simon’s Board of Directors. In addition, Simon’s Board of Directors has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of its officers, directors, and employees and those of its subsidiaries. At least a majority of the members of Simon’s Board of Directors must qualify, and do qualify, as independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, and cannot be affiliated with the Simon family, who are significant stockholders in Simon and/or unitholders in the Operating Partnership. In addition, the Audit and Compensation and Human Capital Committees of Simon’s Board of Directors are comprised entirely of independent members who meet the additional independence and financial expert requirements of the NYSE as required.
7
The sale by the Operating Partnership of any property that it owns may have an adverse tax impact on the Simon family or other limited partners of the Operating Partnership. Any transaction between us and the Simon family, including property acquisitions, service and property management agreements and retail space leases, must be approved by the Company’s Audit Committee.
In order to avoid any conflict of interest, the Simon charter requires that at least three-fourths of Simon’s independent directors must authorize and require the Operating Partnership to sell any property it owns. Any such sale is subject to applicable agreements with third parties. A noncompetition agreement executed by Herbert Simon, Simon’s Chairman Emeritus, and a noncompetition agreement executed by David Simon, Simon’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, which remains in effect notwithstanding the expiration of David Simon’s employment agreement in 2019, contain covenants limiting their ability to participate in certain shopping center activities.
Policies With Respect To Certain Other Activities
We intend to make investments which are consistent with Simon’s qualification as a REIT, unless Simon’s Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in Simon’s best interests to so qualify as a REIT. Simon’s Board of Directors may make such a determination because of changing circumstances or changes in the REIT requirements. Simon has authority to issue shares of its capital stock or other securities in exchange for property. We previously had authority to repurchase or otherwise reacquire Simon’s shares, the Operating Partnership’s units, or any other securities. On February 13, 2017, Simon’s Board of Directors authorized a two-year extension of the previously authorized $2.0 billion common stock repurchase plan, or the Repurchase Program, through March 31, 2019 and on February 11, 2019, Simon's Board of Directors authorized a new common stock repurchase plan. Under the program, the Company could purchase up to $2.0 billion of its common stock during the two-year period ending February 11, 2021. The Repurchase Program was not extended. Simon may also issue shares of its common stock, or pay cash at its option, to holders of units in future periods upon exercise of such holders’ rights under the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership. Our policy prohibits us from making any loans to the directors or executive officers of Simon for any purpose. We may make loans to the joint ventures in which we participate. Additionally, we may make or buy interests in loans secured by real estate properties owned by others or make investments in companies that own real estate assets.
Competition
The retail real estate industry is dynamic and competitive. We compete with numerous merchandise distribution channels, including malls, outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with internet retailing sites and catalogs, including our tenants, which provide retailers with distribution options beyond existing brick and mortar retail properties. The existence of competitive alternatives, accelerated by the impact of COVID-19, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the tenants to occupy the properties that we develop and manage as well as for the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties). We believe that there are numerous factors that make our properties highly desirable to retailers, including:
| ● | the quality, location and diversity of our properties; |
| ● | our management and operational expertise; |
| ● | our extensive experience and relationships with retailers, lenders and suppliers; |
| ● | our marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances; and |
| ● | the sustainability of physical retail. |
Certain Activities
During the past three years, we have:
| ● | issued 375,775 shares of Simon common stock upon the exchange of units in the Operating Partnership; |
| ● | issued 633,881 restricted shares of Simon common stock and 36,252 long-term incentive performance units, or LTIP units, net of forfeitures, under The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, or the 1998 Plan, and the Simon Property Group, L.P. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2019 Plan; |
| ● | purchased 3,492,728 shares of Simon common stock in the open market for $512.4 million pursuant to our Repurchase Programs; |
8
| ● | issued 22,137,500 shares of common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $72.50 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions; |
| ● | issued 955,705 units in the Operating Partnership as part of the consideration for the acquisition of an 80% interest in TRG; |
| ● | redeemed 175,618 units in the Operating Partnership at an average price of $143.34 per unit in cash; |
| ● | amended and replaced in its entirety the Operating Partnership’s existing Credit Facility in March 2020, by entering into an unsecured credit facility compromised of (i) an amendment and extension of the Credit Facility and (ii) a $2.0 billion delayed-draw term loan facility, or Term Facility; |
| ● | amended the Credit Facility to transition the borrowing rates from LIBOR to successor benchmark indexes in November 2021; |
| ● | amended, restated, and extended the Supplemental Facility in October 2021; |
| ● | borrowed a maximum amount of $3.9 billion under the Credit Facilities; the outstanding amount of borrowings under the Credit Facility and Supplemental Facility as of December 31, 2021 were $125.0 million and $1.05 billion, respectively; |
| ● | borrowed a maximum amount of $2.0 billion under the Term Facility; there were no outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2021; |
| ● | the outstanding amount of Commercial Paper notes as of December 31, 2021 was $500.0 million; and |
| ● | provided annual reports containing financial statements audited by our independent registered public accounting firm and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial statements to our security holders. |
Human Capital
At December 31, 2021, we and our affiliates employed approximately 3,300 persons at various properties and offices throughout the United States, of which approximately 900 were part-time. Approximately 1,000 of these employees were located at our corporate headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana.
We believe our employees are the driving force behind our success. To ensure we continue to attract, develop and retain the best talent across the organization, we invest in our employees and provide equal opportunities. We offer a variety of ongoing talent programs that foster continual development, high performance and overall organizational effectiveness, including a series of leadership development programs. We conduct an annual talent-assessment process for selected business functions within our corporate and field organizations that includes plans for individual employee career development and long-term leadership succession, and also conduct an annual performance appraisal process for all regular employees.
We are focused on providing a work environment that is free from any form of discrimination or harassment for any protected class and also embraces principles of inclusiveness. We have implemented a sustainable diversity and inclusion strategy, including an internal policy, targeted solutions for employees and an annual process of assessment, action and evaluation led by our human resources department.
Our compensation program is designed to, among other things, attract, retain and motivate talented and experienced individuals using a mix of competitive salaries, bonuses, equity based awards and other benefits.
Government Regulations Affecting Our Properties
We are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operations conducted on real property. As of December 31, 2021, we are not aware of any environmental conditions or material costs of complying with environmental or other regulations that would have a material adverse effect on our overall business, financial condition, or results of operations. However, it is possible that we are not aware of, or may become subject to, potential environmental liabilities or material costs of complying with governmental regulations that could be material. See further discussion in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Corporate Headquarters
Our corporate headquarters are located at 225 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, and our telephone number is (317) 636-1600.
9
Available Information
Simon is a large accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) and is required, pursuant to Item 101 of Regulation S-K, to provide certain information regarding our website and the availability of certain documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Our Internet website address is www.simon.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available or may be accessed free of charge through the “About Simon/Investor Relations” section of our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not, and are not intended to be, incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following corporate governance documents are also available through the “About Simon/Investor Relations/ Governance” section of our Internet website or may be obtained in print form by request of our Investor Relations Department: Governance Principles, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation and Human Capital Committees Charter, and Governance and Nominating Committee Charter.
In addition, we intend to disclose on our Internet website any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to rules of the SEC and the NYSE.
Information about our Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to Simon’s executive officers as of February 25, 2021.
Name | Age | Position | ||
David Simon | 60 | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | ||
John Rulli | 65 | Chief Administrative Officer | ||
Steven E. Fivel | 61 | General Counsel and Secretary | ||
Brian J. McDade | 42 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||
Alexander L. W. Snyder | 52 | Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary | ||
Adam J. Reuille | 47 | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
The executive officers of Simon serve at the pleasure of Simon’s Board of Directors.
Mr. Simon has served as the Chairman of Simon’s Board of Directors since 2007, Chief Executive Officer of Simon or its predecessor since 1995 and assumed the position of President in 2019. Mr. Simon has also been a director of Simon or its predecessor since its incorporation in 1993. Mr. Simon was the President of Simon’s predecessor from 1993 to 1996. He is the nephew of Herbert Simon.
Mr. Rulli serves as Simon’s Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Rulli joined Melvin Simon Associates, Inc., or MSA, in 1988 and held various positions with MSA and Simon thereafter. Mr. Rulli became Chief Administrative Officer in 2007 and was promoted to Senior Executive Vice President in 2011.
Mr. Fivel serves as Simon’s General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to rejoining Simon in 2011 as Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, Mr. Fivel served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Brightpoint, Inc. Mr. Fivel was previously employed by MSA from 1988 until 1993 and then by Simon from 1993 to 1996. Mr. Fivel was promoted to General Counsel and Secretary in 2017.
Mr. McDade serves as Simon’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. McDade joined Simon in 2007 as the Director of Capital Markets and was promoted to Senior Vice President of Capital Markets in 2013. Mr. McDade became Treasurer in 2014 and was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 2018.
Mr. Snyder serves as Simon’s Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. Mr. Snyder joined Simon in 2016 as Senior Deputy General Counsel. Immediately prior to joining Simon, Mr. Snyder was Managing Partner of the Crimson Fulcrum Strategic Institute. Mr. Snyder previously served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Beechcraft Corporation as well as Chief Counsel Mergers Acquisitions for Koch Industries, Inc. Mr. Snyder was promoted to Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary in 2017.
Mr. Reuille serves as Simon’s Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and prior to that as Simon’s Vice President and Corporate Controller. Mr. Reuille joined Simon in 2009 and was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in 2018.
10
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following factors, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and presented elsewhere by our management from time to time. These factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, funds from operations, or FFO, and prospects, which we refer to herein as a material adverse effect on us or as materially and adversely affecting us, and you should carefully consider them. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or which are currently not believed to be material may also affect our actual results. We may update these factors in our future periodic reports.
Summary of Risk Factors
The following summarizes our material risk factors. However, this summary is not intended to be a comprehensive and complete list of all risk factors identified by the Company. Refer to the following pages of this section for additional details regarding these summarized risk factors and other additional risk factors identified by the Company.
| ● | The ongoing novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and governmental restrictions intended to prevent its spread, as well as other future epidemics, pandemics or public health crises, could have a significant negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and liquidity and our ability to access the capital markets, satisfy our debt service obligations and make distributions to our shareholders. |
| ● | Conditions that adversely affect the general retail environment could materially and adversely affect us. |
| ● | Some of our properties depend on anchor stores or other large nationally recognized tenants to attract shoppers and we could be materially and adversely affected by the loss of one or more of these anchors or tenants. |
| ● | We face potential adverse effects from tenant bankruptcies. |
| ● | We face a wide range of competition that could affect our ability to operate profitably, including e-commerce. |
| ● | Vacant space at our properties could materially and adversely affect us. |
| ● | We may not be able to lease newly developed properties to or renew leases and relet space at existing properties with an appropriate mix of tenants, if at all. |
| ● | Our international activities may subject us to risks that are different from or greater than those associated with our domestic operations. |
| ● | We face risks associated with the acquisition, development, redevelopment and expansion of properties. |
| ● | We have a substantial debt burden that could affect our future operations. |
| ● | The agreements that govern our indebtedness contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us that might affect our ability to operate freely. |
| ● | Disruption in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our ability to access external financings for our growth and ongoing debt service requirements. |
| ● | Adverse changes in our credit ratings could affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms. |
| ● | Simon and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have elected to be taxed as REITs in the United States. The failure to maintain Simon’s or the Subsidiary REITs’ qualifications as REITs or changes in applicable tax laws or regulations could result in adverse tax consequences. |
| ● | If the Operating Partnership fails to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, we would cease to qualify as a REIT and suffer other adverse consequences. |
| ● | Our ownership of TRSs is subject to certain restrictions, and we will be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on certain income or deductions if our transactions with our TRSs are not conducted on arm’s-length terms. |
| ● | We have limited control with respect to some properties that are partially owned or managed by third parties, which may adversely affect our ability to sell or refinance them. |
| ● | The Operating Partnership guarantees debt or otherwise provides support for a number of joint venture properties. |
11
| ● | Some of our properties are subject to potential natural or other disasters. |
Risks Relating to Retail Operations
The ongoing novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and governmental restrictions intended to prevent its spread, as well as other future epidemics, pandemics or public health crises, could have a significant negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and liquidity and our ability to access the capital markets, satisfy our debt service obligations and make distributions to our shareholders.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a material negative impact on economic and market conditions around the world, and, notwithstanding the fact that vaccines are being administered in the United States and elsewhere, the pandemic continues to adversely impact economic activity in retail real estate. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and governments and other authorities, including where we own or hold interests in properties, have imposed measures intended to control its spread, including restrictions on freedom of movement, group gatherings and business operations such as travel bans, border closings, business closures, quarantines, stay-at-home, shelter-in-place orders, density limitations and social distancing measures. Governments and other authorities are in varying stages of lifting or modifying some of these measures. However, governments and other authorities have already been forced to, and others may in the future, reinstitute these measures or impose new, more restrictive measures, if the risks, or the tenants’ and consumers' perception of the risks, related to the COVID-19 pandemic worsen at any time. Although tenants and consumers have been adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic, with tenants adding services like curbside pickup, and while consumer risk-tolerance is evolving, such adaptations and evolution may take time, and there is no guarantee that retail will return to pre-pandemic levels even once the pandemic subsides.
As of December 31, 2021, we owned or held an interest in 199 income-producing properties in the United States located in 37 states and Puerto Rico. We also own an 80% noncontrolling interest in TRG, which has an interest in 24 regional, super-regional, and outlet malls in the U.S. and Asia. Internationally, as of December 31, 2021, we had ownership interests in 33 properties primarily located in Asia, Europe and Canada and have two international outlet properties under development. We have an interest in a European investee that has interests in 11 Designer Outlet properties, as more fully described elsewhere in this Annual Report. As of December 31, 2021, we also owned a 22.4% equity stake in Klépierre SA, or Klépierre, a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in, shopping centers located in 14 countries in Europe.
Demand for retail space and the profitability of our properties depends, in part, on the ability and willingness of tenants to enter into and perform obligations under leases. Although the harshest restrictions to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have generally been lifted or reduced, and vaccines are being administered in the United States and elsewhere, the willingness of customers to visit our properties may be reduced and our tenants’ businesses adversely affected, based upon many factors, including local transmission rates, the emergence of new variants, the development, availability, distribution, effectiveness and acceptance of existing and new vaccines, and the effectiveness and availability of cures or treatments. Further, demand could remain reduced due to heightened sensitivity to risks associated with the transmission of COVID-19 or other associated diseases. In addition, some of our properties are located at or within a close proximity to tourist destinations, and these properties and our tenants’ businesses have been, and may be in the future, heavily and adversely impacted by reductions in travel and tourism resulting from travel bans or restrictions and general concern regarding the risk of travel.
The continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and make distributions to our shareholders could depend on additional factors, including:
| ● | the financial condition and viability of our tenants, and their ability or willingness to pay rent in full; |
| ● | state, local, federal and industry-initiated tenant relief efforts that may adversely affect landlords, including us, and their ability to collect rent and/or enforce remedies for the failure to pay rent; |
| ● | the increased popularity and utilization of e-commerce; |
| ● | our ability to renew leases or re-lease available space in our properties on favorable terms or at all, including as a result of a deterioration in the economic and market conditions in the markets in which we own properties or due to restrictions intended to prevent the spread of COVID-19, including any additional government mandated closures of businesses that frustrate our leasing activities; |
12
| ● | a severe and prolonged disruption and instability in the global financial markets, including the debt and equity capital markets, all of which have already been experienced and which may continue to affect our or our tenants' ability to access capital necessary to fund our or their respective business operations or repay, refinance or renew maturing liabilities on a timely basis, on attractive terms, or at all and may adversely affect the valuation of financial assets and liabilities, any of which could affect our and our tenants' ability to meet liquidity and capital expenditure requirements; |
| ● | a refusal or failure of one or more lenders under our credit facility to fund their respective financing commitment to us may affect our ability to access capital necessary to fund our business operations and to meet our liquidity and capital expenditure requirements; |
| ● | a reduction in the cash flows generated by our properties and the values of our properties that could result in impairments or limit our ability to dispose of them at attractive prices or obtain debt financing secured by our properties; |
| ● | the complete or partial closure of one or more of our tenants' manufacturing facilities or distribution centers, temporary or long-term disruption in our tenants' supply chains from local and international suppliers and/or delays in the delivery of our tenants' inventory, any of which could reduce or eliminate our tenants' sales, cause the temporary closure of our tenants' businesses, and/or result in their bankruptcy or insolvency; |
| ● | a negative impact on consumer discretionary spending caused by high unemployment levels, reduced economic activity or a severe or prolonged recession; |
| ● | our and our tenants' ability to manage our respective businesses to the extent our and their management or personnel (including on-site employees) are impacted in significant numbers by the COVID-19 pandemic or are otherwise not willing, available or allowed to conduct work, including any impact on our tenants' ability to deliver timely information to us that is necessary for us to make effective decisions; and |
| ● | our and our tenants' ability to ensure business continuity in the event our or our tenants' continuity of operations plan is (i) not effective or improperly implemented or deployed or (ii) compromised due to increased cyber and remote access activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
To the extent any of these risks and uncertainties adversely impact us in the ways described above or otherwise, they may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described herein.
Conditions that adversely affect the general retail environment could materially and adversely affect us.
Our concentration in the retail real estate market – our primary source of revenue is retail tenants – means that we could be materially and adversely affected by conditions that materially and adversely affect the retail environment generally, including, without limitation:
| ● | levels of consumer spending, changes in consumer confidence, income levels, and fluctuations in seasonal spending in the United States and internationally; |
| ● | consumers avoiding traveling for shopping due to a heightened level of concern for safety in public places in light of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the potential for civil unrest, including random acts of violence and riots; |
| ● | significant reductions in international travel and tourism, resulting in fewer international retail consumers; |
| ● | consumer perceptions of the convenience and attractiveness of our properties; |
| ● | the impact on our retail tenants and demand for retail space at our properties from the increasing use of the Internet by retailers and consumers, which has accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic; |
| ● | the creditworthiness of our retail tenants and the availability of new creditworthy tenants and the related impact on our occupancy levels and lease income; |
| ● | local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or reduction in demand for, retail space or retail goods, decreases in rental rates and declines in real estate values; |
| ● | the willingness of retailers to lease space in our properties at attractive rents, or at all; |
| ● | actual or perceived changes in national and international economic conditions, which can result from global events such as international trade disputes, a foreign debt crisis, foreign currency volatility, natural disasters, war, |
13
| epidemics and pandemics, the fear of spread of contagious diseases, civil unrest and terrorism, as well as from domestic issues, such as government policies and regulations, tariffs, energy prices, market dynamics, rising interest rates, inflation and limited growth in consumer income; |
| ● | changes in regional and local economies, which may be affected by increased rates of unemployment, increased foreclosures, higher taxes, decreased tourism, industry slowdowns, adverse weather conditions, and other factors; |
| ● | increased operating costs and capital expenditures, whether from redevelopments, replacing tenants or otherwise; |
| ● | changes in applicable laws and regulations, including tax, environmental, safety and zoning; and |
| ● | the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and restrictions intended to prevent its spread, which were implemented through a combination of state, local and federal orders and regulations that were put in place with unprecedented speed and with no opportunity for citizens to challenge their legality. |
Additionally, a portion of our lease income is derived from overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount that directly depend on the sales volume of our retail tenants. Accordingly, declines in our tenants’ sales performance could reduce the income produced by our properties.
Some of our properties depend on anchor stores or other large nationally recognized tenants to attract shoppers and we could be materially and adversely affected by the loss of one or more of these anchors or tenants.
Our properties are typically anchored by department stores and other large nationally recognized tenants. Certain of our anchors and other tenants have ceased their operations, downsized their brick-and-mortar presence or failed to comply with their contractual obligations to us and others, and such actions have become more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sustained adverse pressure on the results of department stores and other national retailers may have a similarly sustained adverse impact upon our own results. Certain department stores and other national retailers have experienced, and may continue to experience for the foreseeable future (given uncertainty with respect to current and future macroeconomic conditions and consumer confidence levels), considerable decreases in customer traffic in their retail stores, increased competition from alternative retail options such as those accessible via the Internet and other forms of pressure on their business models. As pressure on these department stores and other national retailers increases, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic, their ability to maintain their stores, meet their obligations both to us and to their external lenders and suppliers, withstand takeover attempts or avoid bankruptcy and/or liquidation may be impaired and result in closures of their stores or their seeking of a lease modification with us. Any lease modification could be unfavorable to us as the lessor and could decrease current or future effective rents or expense recovery charges. Certain other tenants are entitled to modify the economic or other terms of, or terminate, their existing leases with us in the event of such closures. Additionally, corporate merger or consolidation activity among department stores and other national retailers typically results in the closure of duplicate or geographically overlapping store locations.
If a department store or large nationally recognized tenant were to close its stores at our properties, we may experience difficulty and delay and incur significant expense in re-tenanting the space, as well as in leasing spaces in areas adjacent to the vacant store, at attractive rates, or at all. Additionally, department store or tenant closures may result in decreased customer traffic, which could lead to decreased sales at our properties. If the sales of stores operating in our properties were to decline significantly due to the closing of anchor stores or other national retailers, adverse economic conditions or other reasons, tenants may be unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. In the event of any default by a tenant, we may not be able to fully recover, and/or may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover, amounts due to us under the terms of our leases with such parties.
We face potential adverse effects from tenant bankruptcies.
Bankruptcy filings by retailers can occur regularly in the course of our operations. Although we did not see an increase in tenant bankruptcies in 2021, in previous years a number of companies in the retail industry, including certain of our tenants, have declared bankruptcy, and these numbers have increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic. If a tenant files for bankruptcy, the tenant may have the right to reject and terminate one or more of its leases with us, and we cannot be sure that it will affirm one or more of its leases and continue to make rental payments to us in a timely manner. A
14
bankruptcy filing by, or relating to, one of our tenants would generally prohibit us from evicting this tenant, and bar all efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant, or from their property, unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. In addition, we cannot evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. If a lease is assumed by the tenant in bankruptcy, all pre-bankruptcy balances due under the lease must be paid to us in full. If a lease is rejected, the unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt tenant might be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims, and there are restrictions under bankruptcy laws that limit the amount of the claim we can make if a lease is rejected. As a result, it is likely that we would recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims we hold. In addition, we may make lease modifications either pre- or post-bankruptcy for certain tenants undergoing significant financial distress in order for them to continue as a going concern. Furthermore, we may be required to incur significant expense in re-tenanting the space formerly leased to the bankrupt tenant. We continually seek to re-lease vacant spaces resulting from tenant terminations. The bankruptcy of a tenant, particularly an anchor tenant or a national tenant with multiple locations, may require a substantial redevelopment of its space, the success of which cannot be assured, and may make the re-tenanting of its space difficult and costly. Any such bankruptcies also make it more difficult to lease the remainder of the space at the affected property or properties. Future tenant bankruptcies may strain our resources and impact our ability to successfully execute our re-leasing strategy and could materially and adversely affect us.
We face a wide range of competition that could affect our ability to operate profitably, including e-commerce.
Our properties compete with other forms of retailing such as pure online retail websites as well as other retail properties such as single user freestanding discounters (Costco, Walmart and Target). In addition, many of our tenants are omni-channel retailers who also distribute their products through online sales. Our business currently is predominantly reliant on consumer demand for shopping at physical stores, and we could be materially and adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in adapting our business to evolving consumer purchasing habits. The increased popularity of digital and mobile technologies has accelerated the transition of a percentage of market share from shopping at physical stores to web-based shopping, and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions intended to prevent its spread have significantly increased the utilization of e-commerce and may, particularly in certain market segments, accelerate the long-term penetration of pure online retail which has been able to sell non-essential goods during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only has the temporary closure of our retail properties and the restrictions put in place by state, local and federal officials caused consumers who otherwise would have purchased from retailers at our properties to increase their utilization of pure online retail websites, but consumers whose previous use of online retail was low or non-existent have recently turned to pure online retail as a necessity due to the inability to access our properties and the ability to purchase non-essential goods from these pure online retailers. Although a brick-and-mortar presence may have a positive impact on retailers’ online sales, the increased utilization of pure online shopping may lead to the closure of underperforming stores by retailers, which could impact our occupancy levels and the rates that tenants are willing to pay to lease our space.
Vacant space at our properties could materially and adversely affect us.
Certain of our properties have had vacant space available for prospective tenants, and those properties may continue to experience, and other properties may commence experiencing, such oversupply in the future. Among other causes, (1) there has been an increased number of bankruptcies of anchor stores and other national retailers, as well as store closures, and (2) there has been lower demand from retail tenants for space, due to certain retailers increasing their use of e-commerce websites to distribute their merchandise, with each of (1) and (2) accelerating as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the increased bargaining power of creditworthy retail tenants, there is downward pressure on our rental rates and occupancy levels, and this increased bargaining power may also result in us having to increase our spend on tenant improvements and potentially make other lease modifications in order to attract or retain tenants, any of which, in the aggregate, could materially and adversely affect us.
We may not be able to lease newly developed properties to or renew leases and relet space at existing properties with an appropriate mix of tenants, if at all.
We may not be able to lease new properties to an appropriate mix of tenants that generates optimal customer traffic. Also, when leases for our existing properties expire, the premises may not be relet or the terms of reletting, including the cost of allowances and concessions to tenants may be less favorable than the current lease terms. If we fail to identify and secure the right blend of tenants at our newly developed and existing properties, our properties may not appeal to the communities they serve. If we elect to pursue a “mixed use” redevelopment we expose ourselves to risks associated with each non-retail use (e.g. office, residential, hotel and entertainment), and the performance of our retail tenants in such
15
properties may be negatively impacted by delays in opening and/or the performance of such non-retail uses. To the extent that our leasing goals are not achieved, we could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Real Estate Investments and Operations
Our international activities may subject us to risks that are different from or greater than those associated with our domestic operations.
As of December 31, 2021, we held interests in consolidated and joint venture properties that operate in Austria, Canada, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. We also have an equity stake in Klépierre, a publicly traded European real estate company, which operates in 14 countries in Europe. Accordingly, our operating results and the value of our international operations may be impacted by any unhedged movements in the foreign currencies in which those operations transact and in which our net investment in those international operations is held. While we occasionally enter into hedging agreements to manage our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates, these agreements may not eliminate foreign currency risk entirely.
We may pursue additional investment, ownership, development and redevelopment/expansion opportunities outside the United States. Such international activities carry risks that are different from those we face with our domestic properties and operations. These risks include, but are not limited to:
| ● | adverse effects of changes in exchange rates for foreign currencies; |
| ● | changes in foreign political and economic environments, regionally, nationally, and locally; |
| ● | impact from international trade disputes and the associated impact on our tenants’ supply chain and consumer spending levels; |
| ● | challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws, including corporate governance, operations, taxes and litigation; |
| ● | the risk that we, our employees and/or agents could violate anti-bribery, anti-corruption and international trade laws in the U.S., such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and certain foreign countries, such as the U.K. Bribery Act, which could result in criminal or civil sanctions and/or fines, negatively impact our reputation, or require us to incur significant expenses to investigate; |
| ● | differing lending practices; |
| ● | differences in cultures and consumer retail behavior; |
| ● | changes in applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect international operations; |
| ● | changes in applicable laws and regulations in these foreign jurisdictions; |
| ● | difficulties in managing international operations; |
| ● | obstacles to the repatriation of earnings and cash; and |
| ● | labor discord, political or civil unrest, acts of terrorism, epidemics and pandemics, including COVID-19, the fear of spread of contagious diseases, or the threat of international boycotts. |
Our international activities represented approximately 7.1% of consolidated net income and 8.5% of our net operating income, or NOI, for the year ended December 31, 2021. To the extent that we expand our international activities, the above risks could increase in significance, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on us.
We face risks associated with the acquisition, development, redevelopment and expansion of properties.
We regularly acquire and develop new properties and redevelop and expand existing properties, and these activities are subject to various risks. We may not be successful in pursuing acquisition, development or redevelopment/expansion opportunities. In addition, newly acquired, developed or redeveloped/expanded properties may not perform as well as expected, impacting our anticipated return on investment. We are subject to other risks in connection with any acquisition, development and redevelopment/expansion activities, including the following:
| ● | acquisition or construction costs of a project may be higher than projected, potentially making the project unfeasible or unprofitable; |
16
| ● | development, redevelopment or expansions may take considerably longer than expected, delaying the commencement and amount of income from the property; |
| ● | we may not be able to obtain financing or to refinance loans on favorable terms, or at all; |
| ● | we may be unable to obtain zoning, occupancy or other governmental approvals; |
| ● | occupancy rates and rents may not meet our projections and the project may not be accretive; and |
| ● | we may need the consent of third parties such as department stores, anchor tenants, mortgage lenders and joint venture partners, and those consents may be withheld. |
If a development or redevelopment/expansion project is unsuccessful, either because it is not meeting our expectations when operational or was not completed according to the project planning, we could lose our investment in the project. Further, if we guarantee the property’s financing, our loss could exceed our investment in the project.
In the event that these risks were realized at the same time at multiple properties, we could be materially and adversely affected.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid.
Our properties represent a substantial portion of our total consolidated assets. These investments are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties or investments in real estate in response to any changes in economic, industry, or other conditions may be limited. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability and terms of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand for space, that are beyond our control. If we want to sell a property, we cannot assure you that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period, or at all, or that the sales price of a property will be attractive at the relevant time or exceed the carrying value of our investment. Moreover, if a property is mortgaged, we may not be able to obtain a release of the lien on that property without the payment of the associated debt and/or a substantial prepayment penalty, which could restrict our ability to dispose of the property, even though the sale might otherwise be desirable.
Risks Relating to Debt and the Financial Markets
We have a substantial debt burden that could affect our future operations.
As of December 31, 2021, our consolidated mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, excluding related premium, discount and debt issuance costs, totaled $25.4 billion. As a result of this indebtedness, we are required to use a substantial portion of our cash flows for debt service, including selected repayment at scheduled maturities, which limits our ability to use those cash flows to fund the growth of our business. We are also subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flows from operations will be insufficient to meet required debt service or that we will be able to refinance such indebtedness on acceptable terms, or at all. Our debt service costs generally will not be reduced if developments at the applicable property, such as the entry of new competitors or the loss of major tenants, cause a reduction in the income from the property. Our indebtedness could also have other adverse consequences on us, including reducing our access to capital or increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic, industry and market conditions. In addition, if a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and income from such property is insufficient to pay that indebtedness, the property could be foreclosed upon by the mortgagee resulting in a loss of income and a decline in our total asset value. If any of the foregoing occurs, we could be materially and adversely affected.
The agreements that govern our indebtedness contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us that might affect our ability to operate freely.
We have a variety of unsecured debt, including the Credit Facilities, senior unsecured notes and commercial paper, and secured property level debt. Certain of the agreements that govern our indebtedness contain covenants, including, among other things, limitations on our ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of our assets and engage in mergers and certain acquisitions. In addition, certain of the agreements that govern our indebtedness contain financial covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios, including certain coverage ratios. These covenants may restrict our ability to pursue certain business initiatives or certain transactions that might otherwise be advantageous to us. In addition, our ability to comply with these provisions might be affected by events beyond our control. Failure to comply with any of our financing covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate the related indebtedness as well as other of our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
17
Disruption in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our ability to access external financings for our growth and ongoing debt service requirements.
We depend on external financings, principally debt financings, to fund the growth of our business and to ensure that we can meet ongoing maturities of our outstanding debt. Our access to financing depends on our credit ratings, the willingness of lending institutions and other debt investors to grant credit to us and conditions in the capital markets in general. An economic recession may cause extreme volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets. We rely upon the Credit Facilities as sources of funding for numerous transactions. Our access to these funds is dependent upon the ability of each of the participants to the Credit Facilities to meet their funding commitments to us. When markets are volatile, access to capital and credit markets could be disrupted over an extended period of time and one or more financial institutions may not have the available capital to meet their previous commitments to us. The failure of one or more participants to the Credit Facilities to meet their funding commitments to us could have a material adverse effect on us, including as a result of making it difficult to obtain the financing we may need for future growth and/or meeting our debt service requirements. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the financing we need for the future growth of our business or to meet our debt service requirements, or that a sufficient amount of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.
The Operating Partnership’s outstanding senior unsecured notes, the Credit Facilities, the Commercial Paper program, and Simon’s preferred stock are periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. The credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, financial condition and prospects, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to us and our industry and the economic outlook in general. Our credit ratings can affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financing we obtain. Since we depend primarily on debt financing to fund the growth of our business, an adverse change in our credit ratings, including actual changes and changes in outlook, or even the initiation of a review of our credit ratings that could result in an adverse change, could have a material adverse effect on us.
An increase in interest rates would increase our interest costs on variable rate debt and could adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt on attractive terms, or at all; our hedging interest rate protection arrangements may not effectively limit our interest rate risk.
As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately $2.0 billion of outstanding consolidated indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates, and we may incur more variable rate indebtedness in the future. If interest rates increase, then so would the interest costs on our unhedged variable rate debt, which could adversely affect our cash flows and our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Further, rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures or significantly increase our future interest expense.
We selectively manage our exposure to interest rate risk by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap all or a portion of our variable rate debt. In addition, we refinance fixed rate debt at times when we believe rates and other terms are appropriate. Our efforts to manage these exposures may not be successful.
Our use of interest rate hedging arrangements to manage risk associated with interest rate volatility may expose us to additional risks, including a risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement may fail to honor its obligations or that we could be required to fund our contractual payment obligations under such arrangements in relatively large amounts or on short notice. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. Termination of these hedging agreements typically involves costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs.
We may be adversely affected by developments in the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) market, changes in the methods by which LIBOR is determined or the use of alternative reference rates.
As of December 31, 2021, approximately 2.0% or $501.4 million of our debt outstanding was indexed to LIBOR. In 2021 we amended the Credit Facility and the Supplemental Facility to transition the borrowing rates from LIBOR to successor benchmark indexes. In 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR, and in 2021, it announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of 1 week and 2 month USD setting, and immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining USD settings. The U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) has also advised banks to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate. The Alternative Refinance Rate Committee, a committee convened by the Federal Reserve that includes major market
18
participants, has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by U.S. Treasury securities, as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR in the U.S. Working groups formed by financial regulators in other jurisdictions, including the U.K., the European Union, Japan and Switzerland, have also recommended alternatives to LIBOR denominated in their local currencies. Although SOFR appears to be the preferred replacement rate for USD LIBOR, it is unclear if other benchmarks may emerge or if other rates will be adopted outside of the United States. At this time, it is not possible to predict how markets will respond to SOFR or other alternative reference rates as the transition away from the LIBOR benchmark is anticipated in coming years. Accordingly, the outcome of these reforms is uncertain and any changes in the methods by which LIBOR is determined or regulatory activity related to LIBOR’s phaseout could cause LIBOR to perform differently than in the past or cease to exist. The consequences of these developments cannot be entirely predicted, and there can be no assurance that they will not result in financial market disruptions, significant increases in benchmark interest rates, substantially higher financing costs or a shortage of available debt financing, any of which could have an adverse effect on us, which currently would be limited by our relatively low exposure to variable rate LIBOR-based debt.
Risks Relating to Income Taxes
Simon and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have elected to be taxed as REITs in the United States. The failure to maintain Simon’s or the Subsidiary REITs’ qualifications as REITs or changes in applicable tax laws or regulations could result in adverse tax consequences.
In the United States, Simon and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have elected to be taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. We believe that Simon and these subsidiaries, or the Subsidiary REITs, have been organized and have operated in a manner which allows them to qualify for taxation as REITs under the Internal Revenue Code. We intend to continue to operate in this manner. However, qualification and taxation as REITs depend upon the ability of Simon and the Subsidiary REITs to satisfy several requirements (some of which are outside our control), including tests related to our annual operating results, asset diversification, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. The various REIT qualification tests required by the Internal Revenue Code are highly technical and complex. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Simon or any of the Subsidiary REITs has operated in accordance with these requirements or will continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.
If Simon or any of the Subsidiary REITs fail to comply with those provisions, Simon or any such Subsidiary REIT may be subject to monetary penalties or ultimately to possible disqualification as REITs. If such events occur, and if available relief provisions do not apply:
| ● | Simon or any such subsidiary will not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing taxable income; |
| ● | Simon or any such subsidiary will be subject to corporate-level income tax on taxable income at the corporate rate; |
| ● | Simon or any such Subsidiary REIT could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for taxable years prior to 2018; and |
| ● | unless entitled to relief under relevant statutory provisions, Simon or any such subsidiary will also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. |
Any such corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for, among other things, our operations and distributions to stockholders. In addition, if Simon fails to qualify as a REIT, it will not be required to make distributions to our stockholders. Moreover, a failure by any subsidiary of the Operating Partnership that has elected to be taxed as a REIT to qualify as a REIT would also cause Simon to fail to qualify as a REIT, and the same adverse consequences would apply to it and its stockholders. Failure by Simon or any of the Subsidiary REITs to qualify as a REIT also could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Additionally, we are subject to certain income-based taxes, both domestically and internationally, and other taxes, including state and local taxes, franchise taxes, and withholding taxes on dividends from certain of our international
19
investments. We currently follow local tax laws and regulations in various domestic and international jurisdictions. Should these laws or regulations change, the amount of taxes we pay may increase accordingly.
If the Operating Partnership fails to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, we would cease to qualify as a REIT and suffer other adverse consequences.
We believe that the Operating Partnership is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, the Operating Partnership is not subject to federal income tax on its income. Instead, each of its partners, including us, is allocated, and may be required to pay tax with respect to, such partner’s share of its income. We cannot assure you that the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, will not challenge the status of the Operating Partnership or any other subsidiary partnership or limited liability company in which we own an interest as a disregarded entity or partnership for federal income tax purposes, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in treating the Operating Partnership or any such other subsidiary as an entity taxable as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would fail to meet the gross income tests and certain of the asset tests applicable to REITs and, accordingly, we would likely cease to qualify as a REIT. Also, the failure of the Operating Partnership or any subsidiary partnerships or limited liability company to qualify as a disregarded entity or partnership for applicable income tax purposes could cause it to become subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which would reduce significantly the amount of cash available for debt service and for distribution to its partners or members, including us.
Our ownership of TRSs is subject to certain restrictions, and we will be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on certain income or deductions if our transactions with our TRSs are not conducted on arm’s-length terms.
We own securities in taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, and may acquire securities in additional TRSs in the future. A TRS is a corporation other than a REIT in which a REIT directly or indirectly holds stock, and that has made a joint election with such REIT to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary. If a TRS owns more than 35% of the total voting power or value of the outstanding securities of another corporation, such other corporation will also be treated as a TRS. Other than some activities relating to lodging and health care facilities, a TRS may generally engage in any business, including the provision of customary or non-customary services to tenants of its parent REIT. A TRS is subject to federal income tax as a regular C corporation. In addition, a 100% excise tax will be imposed on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s length basis.
A REIT’s ownership of securities of a TRS is not subject to the 5% or 10% asset tests applicable to REITs. Not more than 25% of the value of Simon’s or any Subsidiary REIT’s total assets may be represented by securities (including securities of TRSs), other than those securities includable in the 75% asset test, and not more than 20% of the value of our total assets or the assets of any Subsidiary REIT may be represented by securities of TRSs. We anticipate that the aggregate value of the stock and securities of any TRS and other nonqualifying assets that Simon or each such Subsidiary REIT owns will be less than 25% (or 20%, as applicable) of the value of Simon’s or such subsidiary’s total assets, and we will monitor the value of these investments to ensure compliance with applicable ownership limitations. In addition, we intend to structure transactions with any TRSs that we own to ensure that they are entered into on arm’s length terms to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to comply with the above limitations or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax discussed above.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends, which may negatively affect the value of our shares.
Income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates are generally subject to tax at preferential rates, currently at a maximum federal rate of 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the TCJA, however, U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally may deduct up to 20% of the ordinary dividends (e.g., dividends not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) received from a REIT for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. Although this deduction reduces the effective tax rate applicable to certain dividends paid by REITs (generally to 29.6% assuming the shareholder is subject to the 37% maximum rate), such tax rate is still higher than the tax rate applicable to corporate dividends that constitute qualified dividend income. Accordingly, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of our common stock.
The tax imposed on REITs engaging in “prohibited transactions” may limit our ability to engage in transactions which would be treated as sales for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions
20
are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Although we do not intend to hold any properties that would be characterized as held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, unless a sale or disposition qualifies under certain statutory safe harbors, such characterization is a factual determination and no guarantee can be given that the IRS, would agree with our characterization of our properties or that we will always be able to make use of the available safe harbors.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to execute our business plan.
In order for Simon and the Subsidiary REITs to qualify to be taxed as REITs, and assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied, Simon and each such Subsidiary REIT generally must distribute at least 90% of their respective REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, to their respective equity holders each year. To this point, Simon and each such Subsidiary REIT have historically distributed at least 100% of its taxable income and thereby avoided income tax altogether. To the extent that Simon or any such Subsidiary REIT satisfies this distribution requirement and qualifies for taxation as a REIT, but distributes less than 100% of its REIT taxable income, Simon or such subsidiary will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its undistributed net taxable income and could be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that is distributed to equity holders in a calendar year is less than the minimum required distribution amount. We intend to make distributions to the equity holders of Simon and the Subsidiary REITs to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
From time to time, Simon and the Subsidiary REITs might generate taxable income greater than their respective cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves, or required debt or amortization payments. If Simon or the Subsidiary REITs do not have other funds available in these situations, Simon or such subsidiaries could be required to access capital on unfavorable terms (the receipt of which cannot be assured), sell assets at disadvantageous prices, distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, or make taxable distributions of capital stock or debt securities to make distributions sufficient to enable them to pay out enough of their respective REIT taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase costs or reduce our equity. Further, amounts distributed will not be available to fund the growth of our business. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to execute our business plan.
Complying with REIT requirements might cause us to forgo otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
To qualify to be taxed as REITs for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Simon and the Subsidiary REITs must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of their respective assets consist of cash, cash items, government securities and “real estate assets” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code), including certain mortgage loans and securities. The remainder of their respective investments (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer.
Additionally, in general, no more than 5% of the value of Simon’s and the Subsidiary REITs’ total assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the value of their respective total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. If Simon or any of the Subsidiary REITs fails to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, Simon or any such Subsidiary REIT must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing its REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we might be required to liquidate or forgo otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to equity holders. Moreover, if Simon or the Subsidiary REITs are compelled to liquidate their investments to meet any of the asset, income or distribution tests, or to repay obligations to lenders, Simon or such subsidiaries may be unable to comply with one or more of the requirements applicable to REITs or may be subject to a 100% tax on any resulting gain if such sales constitute prohibited transactions.
In addition to the asset tests set forth above, to qualify to be taxed as REITs, Simon and the Subsidiary REITs must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of their respective income, the amounts they distribute to equity holders and the ownership of their respective shares. We might be unable to pursue investments that would be otherwise advantageous to us in order to satisfy the source-of-income or asset-diversification requirements for qualifying as REITs. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make certain attractive investments.
21
Partnership tax audit rules could have a material adverse effect on us.
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 changed the rules applicable to U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships. Under the rules, among other changes and subject to certain exceptions, any audit adjustment to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership (and any partner’s distributive share thereof) is determined, and taxes, interest, or penalties attributable thereto could be assessed and collected, at the partnership level. Absent available elections, it is possible that a partnership in which we directly or indirectly invest, could be required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties as a result of an audit adjustment, and we, as a direct or indirect partner of these partnerships, could be required to bear the economic burden of those taxes, interest, and penalties even though Simon and the Subsidiary REITs, as REITs, may not otherwise have been required to pay additional corporate-level taxes had they owned the assets of the partnership directly. The partnership tax audit rules apply to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries that are classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The changes created by these rules are sweeping and, accordingly, there can be no assurance that these rules will not have a material adverse effect on us.
Legislative, administrative, regulatory or other actions affecting REITs, including positions taken by the IRS, could have a material adverse effect on us and our investors.
The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury, or the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws or interpretations thereof by the IRS and the Treasury, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect us and our investors. New legislation (including the TCJA, and any technical corrections legislation), Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect the ability of Simon and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership to qualify to be taxed as REITs and/or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to us and our investors of such qualification.
The TCJA has significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. A change made by the TCJA that could affect us and our stockholders is that it generally limits the deduction for net business interest expense in excess of 30% of a business’s adjusted taxable income except for taxpayers that engage in certain real estate businesses and elect out of this rule (provided that such electing taxpayers must use an alternative depreciation system for certain property).
Risks Relating to Joint Ventures
We have limited control with respect to some properties that are partially owned or managed by third parties, which may adversely affect our ability to sell or refinance them.
As of December 31, 2021, we owned interests in 101 income-producing properties with other parties. Of those, 17 properties are included in our consolidated financial statements. We apply the equity method of accounting to the other 84 properties (the joint venture properties) and our investments in Klépierre (a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company) and The Taubman Realty Group, LLC, or TRG, as well as our investments in certain entities involved in retail operations, such as J.C. Penney and SPARC Group; intellectual property and licensing ventures, such as Authentic Brands Group, LLC, or ABG, and Eddie Bauer Ipco; and an e-commerce venture Rue Gilt Groupe, or RGG, (collectively, our other platform investments). We serve as general partner or property manager for 53 of these 84 joint venture properties; however, certain major decisions, such as approving the operating budget and selling, refinancing, and redeveloping the properties, require the consent of the other owners. Of the joint venture properties for which we do not serve as general partner or property manager, 23 are in our international joint ventures. These international properties are managed locally by joint ventures in which we share control of the properties with our partner. The other owners have participating rights that we consider substantive for purposes of determining control over the joint venture properties’ assets. The remaining joint venture properties, Klépierre, TRG, and our joint ventures with ABG, J.C. Penney, RGG, and SPARC Group are managed by third parties.
These investments, and other future similar investments, could involve risks that would not be present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or other owners might become bankrupt, suffer a deterioration in their creditworthiness, or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. If one of our partners or other owners in these investments were to become bankrupt, we may be precluded from taking certain actions regarding our investments without prior court approval, which at a minimum may delay the actions we would or might want to take. Additionally, partners or other owners could have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our own business interests or goals, and could be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.
These investments, and other future similar investments, also have the potential risk of creating impasses on
22
decisions, such as a sale, financing or development, because neither we nor our partner or other owner has full control over the partnership or joint venture. Disputes between us and partners or other owners might result in litigation or arbitration that could increase our expenses and prevent Simon’s officers and/or directors from focusing their time and efforts on our business. Consequently, actions by, or disputes with, partners or other owners might result in subjecting properties owned by the partnership or joint venture to additional risk. In addition, we risk the possibility of being liable for the actions of our partners or other owners.
The Operating Partnership guarantees debt or otherwise provides support for a number of joint venture properties.
Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by a mortgage on the joint venture property, which is non-recourse to us. Nevertheless, the joint venture’s failure to satisfy its debt obligations could result in the loss of our investment therein. As of December 31, 2021, the Operating Partnership guaranteed joint venture-related mortgage indebtedness of $209.9 million. A default by a joint venture under its debt obligations would expose us to liability under a guaranty. We may elect to fund cash needs of a joint venture through equity contributions (generally on a basis proportionate to our ownership interests), advances or partner loans, although such fundings are not typically required contractually or otherwise.
Risks Relating to Environmental Matters
As owners of real estate, we can face liabilities for environmental contamination, and our efforts to identify environmental liabilities may not be successful.
Many of our properties contain, or at one time contained, asbestos containing materials or underground storage tanks (primarily related to auto service center establishments or emergency electrical generation equipment), and as a result we may be subject to regulatory action in connection with U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to hazardous or toxic substances. We may also be held liable to third parties for personal injury or property damage incurred by the parties in connection with any such substances. The costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances, and related liabilities, may be substantial and could materially and adversely affect us. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to remediate the related contamination, may also adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or redevelop a property or to borrow money using a property as collateral.
Although we believe that our portfolio is in substantial compliance with U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances, this belief is based on limited testing. Nearly all of our properties have been subjected to Phase I or similar environmental audits. These environmental audits have not revealed, nor are we aware of, any environmental liability that we believe is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. However, we cannot assure you that:
| ● | previous environmental studies with respect to the portfolio reveal all potential environmental liabilities; |
| ● | any previous owner, occupant or tenant of a property did not create any material environmental condition not known to us; |
| ● | the current environmental condition of the portfolio will not be affected by tenants and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or by other unrelated third parties; or |
| ● | future uses or conditions (including, without limitation, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof) will not result in environmental liabilities. |
We face risks associated with climate change.
Due to changes in weather patterns caused by climate change, our properties in certain markets could experience increases in storm intensity and rising sea levels. Over time, climate change could result in volatile or decreased demand for retail space at certain of our properties or, in extreme cases, our inability to operate the properties at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) insurance on favorable terms, or at all, increasing the cost of energy at our properties or requiring us to spend funds to repair and protect our properties against such risks. Moreover, compliance with new laws or regulations related to climate change, including compliance with “green” building codes, may require us to make improvements to our existing properties or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties.
23
Some of our properties are subject to potential natural or other disasters.
A number of our properties are located in areas subject to a higher risk of natural disasters such as earthquakes, fires, hurricanes, floods, tornados, hail or tsunamis. The occurrence of natural disasters, which could become more intense and more volatile in light of climate change, can adversely impact operations and development/redevelopment projects at our properties, increase investment costs to repair or replace damaged properties, increase future property insurance costs and negatively impact the tenant demand for lease space. If insurance is unavailable to us or is unavailable on acceptable terms, or our insurance is not adequate to cover losses from these events, we could be materially and adversely affected.
Other Factors Affecting Our Business
Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.
We maintain insurance coverage with third-party carriers who provide a portion of the coverage for specific layers of potential losses, including commercial general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties in the United States as well as cyber coverage. The initial portion of coverage, excess of policy deductibles, not provided by third-party carriers is either insured through our wholly-owned captive insurance company or other financial arrangements controlled by us. A third party carrier has, in turn, agreed to provide, if required, evidence of coverage for this layer of losses under the terms and conditions of the carrier’s policy. A similar policy either written through our captive insurance company or other financial arrangements controlled by us also provides initial coverage for property insurance and certain windstorm risks at the properties located in coastal windstorm locations.
There are some types of losses, including lease and other contract claims, which generally are not insured or are subject to large deductibles. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue it could generate but may remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligation related to the property.
We currently maintain insurance coverage against acts of terrorism on all of our properties in the United States on an “all risk” basis in the amount of up to $1 billion. Despite the existence of this insurance coverage, any threatened or actual terrorist attacks where we operate could materially and adversely affect our property values, revenues, consumer traffic and tenant sales.
We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber‑attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems.
Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, hardware or software corruption or failure or poor product or vendor/developer selection (including a failure of security controls incorporated into or applied to such hardware or software), service provider error or failure, intentional or unintentional actions by employees (including the failure to follow our security protocols) and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.
The risk of a security breach or significant disruption has generally increased due to our increased reliance on technology, a rise in the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks globally, and the remote working environment throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. A breach or significant and extended disruption in the functioning of our systems, including our primary website, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, tenants and revenues, generate third party claims, cause operational disruption, result in the unintended and/or unauthorized public disclosure or the misappropriation of proprietary, personal identifying and confidential information, and require us to incur significant expenses to address and remediate or otherwise resolve these kinds of issues. We may not be able to recover these expenses in whole or in any part from our service providers or responsible parties, or their or our insurers. Additionally, cyber-attacks perpetrated against our tenants, including unauthorized access to customers’ credit card data and other confidential information, could diminish consumer confidence and spending and materially and adversely affect us.
24
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.
The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees, including our CEO, who operate without the existence of employment agreements. Many of our senior executives have extensive experience and strong reputations in the real estate industry, which aid us in identifying opportunities and negotiating with tenants. Our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our executive management team and other key employees or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals for these positions in the future. Losing any one or more of these persons could adversely affect our business, diminish our opportunities and weaken our relationships with lenders, business partners, existing and prospective tenants and others, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Provisions in Simon’s charter and by‑laws and in the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement could prevent a change of control.
Simon’s charter contains a general restriction on the accumulation of shares in excess of 8% of its capital stock. The charter permits the members of the Simon family and related persons to own up to 18% of Simon’s capital stock. Ownership is determined by the lower of the number of outstanding shares, voting power or value controlled. Simon’s Board of Directors may, by majority vote, permit exceptions to those levels in circumstances where Simon’s Board of Directors determines that Simon’s ability to qualify as a REIT will not be jeopardized. These restrictions on ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might otherwise be in the best interest of Simon’s stockholders or the Operating Partnership’s unitholders or preferred unitholders. Other provisions of Simon’s charter and by-laws could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control even if some of Simon’s stockholders or the Operating Partnership’s unitholders or preferred unitholders deem such a change to be in their best interests. These include provisions preventing holders of Simon’s common stock from acting by written consent and requiring that up to four directors in the aggregate may be elected by holders of Class B common stock. In addition, certain provisions of the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control. These include a provision requiring the consent of a majority in interest of units in order for Simon, as general partner of the Operating Partnership, to, among other matters, engage in a merger transaction or sell all or substantially all of its assets.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
25
Item 2. Properties
United States Properties
Our U.S. properties primarily consist of malls, Premium Outlets, The Mills, lifestyle centers and other retail properties. These properties contain an aggregate of approximately 175.3 million square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA.
Malls typically contain at least one department store anchor or a combination of anchors and big box retailers with a wide variety of smaller stores connecting the anchors. Additional stores are usually located along the perimeter of the parking area. Our 95 malls are generally enclosed centers and range in size from approximately 260,000 to 2.7 million square feet of GLA.
Premium Outlets generally contain a wide variety of designer and manufacturer stores located in open-air centers. Our 69 Premium Outlets range in size from approximately 150,000 to 900,000 square feet of GLA. The Premium Outlets are generally located within a close proximity to major metropolitan areas and/or tourist destinations.
The 14 properties in The Mills generally range in size from 1.2 million to 2.3 million square feet of GLA and are located in major metropolitan areas. They have a combination of traditional mall, outlet center, big box retailers and entertainment uses.
We also have interests in six lifestyle centers and 15 other retail properties. The lifestyle centers range in size from 170,000 to 950,000 square feet of GLA. The other retail properties range in size from approximately 200,000 to 1.6 million square feet of GLA and are considered non-core to our business model.
As of December 31, 2021, approximately 93.4% of the owned GLA in malls and Premium Outlets was leased and approximately 97.6% of the owned GLA for The Mills was leased.
We wholly own 131 of our properties, effectively control 10 properties in which we have a joint venture interest, and hold the remaining 58 properties through unconsolidated joint venture interests. We are the managing or co-managing general partner or member of 190 properties in the United States. Certain of our joint venture properties are subject to various rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, put and call rights, or other sale or marketing rights for partners which are customary in real estate partnership agreements and the industry. We and our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions) which may result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings, or the use of Operating Partnership units, to acquire the joint venture interest from our partner.
We own an 80% noncontrolling interest in TRG, which has an interest in 20 regional, super-regional, and outlet malls in the U.S. Our effective ownership in these properties, through our investment in TRG, ranges from 38.8% to 80%.
26
The following property table summarizes certain data for our malls, Premium Outlets, The Mills, lifestyle centers and other retail properties located in the United States, including Puerto Rico, as of December 31, 2021.
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name |
| State |
| City (CBSA) |
| Lease) (3) |
| Ownership |
| Acquired |
| Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Larger Retailers and Uses | |
Malls | |||||||||||||||||
1. | Apple Blossom Mall |
| VA |
| Winchester |
| Fee |
| 49.1 | % (4) | Acquired 1999 |
| 81.8 | % | 473,672 |
| Belk, JCPenney, AMC Cinemas |
2. | Auburn Mall |
| MA |
| Auburn |
| Fee |
| 56.4 | % (4) | Acquired 1999 |
| 88.5 | % | 499,467 |
| Macy's, Reliant Medical (15) |
3. | Aventura Mall (1) |
| FL |
| Miami Beach (Miami) |
| Fee |
| 33.3 | % (4) | Built 1983 |
| 95.5 | % | 2,125,689 |
| Bloomingdale's, Macy's (8), JCPenney, Nordstrom, Equinox Fitness Clubs, AMC Theatres |
4. | Barton Creek Square |
| TX |
| Austin |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1981 |
| 97.9 | % | 1,452,087 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's (8), JCPenney, AMC Theatres |
5. | Battlefield Mall |
| MO |
| Springfield |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2056) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1970 |
| 93.1 | % | 1,207,129 |
| Macy's, Dillard's (8), JCPenney |
6. | Bay Park Square |
| WI |
| Green Bay |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1980 |
| 97.0 | % | 691,143 |
| Kohl's, Marcus Cinema 16, Dave Buster's, Steinhafel Furniture (6) |
7. | Brea Mall |
| CA |
| Brea (Los Angeles) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 94.1 | % | 1,281,795 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's (8), JCPenney |
8. | Briarwood Mall |
| MI |
| Ann Arbor |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 83.1 | % | 978,053 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, Von Maur, Hilton Garden Inn (15), Towne Place Suites by Marriott (15) |
9. | Brickell City Centre |
| FL |
| Miami |
| Fee |
| 25.0 | % (4) | Built 2016 |
| 93.4 | % | 475,606 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue, Cinemex, EAST Miami Hotel (15), Luna Park |
10. | Broadway Square |
| TX |
| Tyler |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1994 |
| 100.0 | % | 608,739 |
| Dillard's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, Party City |
11. | Burlington Mall |
| MA |
| Burlington (Boston) |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2026) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 94.6 | % | 1,209,347 |
| Macy's, Nordstrom, Crate Barrel, Primark, Arhaus Furniture |
12. | Cape Cod Mall |
| MA |
| Hyannis |
| Fee and Ground Leases (2029-2073) (7) |
| 56.4 | % (4) | Acquired 1999 |
| 87.1 | % | 712,338 |
| Macy's (8), Best Buy, Marshalls, Barnes Noble, Regal Cinema, Target, Dick's Sporting Goods, Planet Fitness |
13. | Castleton Square |
| IN |
| Indianapolis |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1972 |
| 93.7 | % | 1,384,395 |
| Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres |
14. | Cielo Vista Mall |
| TX |
| El Paso |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2027) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1974 |
| 99.8 | % | 1,244,987 |
| Macy's, Dillard's (8), JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres |
15. | Coconut Point |
| FL |
| Estero |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 2006 |
| 85.9 | % | 1,197,444 |
| Dillard's, Barnes Noble, Best Buy, DSW, Office Max, PetSmart, Ross, T.J. Maxx, Hollywood Theatres, Super Target, Michael's, Total Wine More, JoAnn Fabrics, Christmas Tree Shops (6), Home Centric (6), Hyatt Place Coconut Point (15), TownePlace Suites by Marriott (15) |
16. | College Mall |
| IN |
| Bloomington |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2048) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1965 |
| 79.2 | % | 609,768 |
| Target, Dick's Sporting Goods, Bed Bath Beyond, Fresh Thyme |
17. | Columbia Center |
| WA |
| Kennewick |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1987 |
| 92.5 | % | 733,755 |
| Macy's (8), JCPenney, Barnes Noble, DSW, Home Goods, Dick's Sporting Goods |
18. | Copley Place |
| MA |
| Boston |
| Fee |
| 94.4 | % (11) | Acquired 2002 |
| 90.1 | % | 1,263,627 |
| Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue Men's, Boston Marriott Copley Place (15), The Westin Copley Place (15) |
19. | Coral Square |
| FL |
| Coral Springs (Miami) |
| Fee |
| 97.2 | % | Built 1984 |
| 91.4 | % | 944,159 |
| Macy's (8), JCPenney, Kohl's |
20. | Cordova Mall |
| FL |
| Pensacola |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 95.7 | % | 925,518 |
| Dillard's, Belk, Best Buy, Bed Bath Beyond, Cost Plus World Market, Ross, Dick's Sporting Goods |
21. | Dadeland Mall |
| FL |
| Miami |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 1997 |
| 96.7 | % | 1,514,626 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue, Macy's (8), JCPenney, AC Hotel by Marriott |
22. | Del Amo Fashion Center |
| CA |
| Torrance (Los Angeles) |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 93.9 | % | 2,519,601 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's (8), JCPenney, Marshalls, Barnes Noble, JoAnn Fabrics, AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dave Buster's, Mitsuwa Marketplace |
23. | Domain, The |
| TX |
| Austin |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2006 |
| 94.0 | % | 1,234,766 |
| Neiman Marcus, Macy's, Dillard's, Dick's Sporting Goods, iPic Theaters, Arhaus Furniture, Punch Bowl Social, Westin Austin at The Domain, Lone Star Court (15), (16) |
24. | Empire Mall |
| SD |
| Sioux Falls |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2033) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 87.3 | % | 1,027,280 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, Hy-Vee, Dick's Sporting Goods |
25. | Falls, The |
| FL |
| Miami |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 98.2 | % | 709,540 |
| Macy's, Regal Cinema, The Fresh Market, LifeTime Athletic (6) |
26. | Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The |
| VA |
| Arlington (Washington, DC) |
| Fee |
| 42.5 | % (4) | Built 1989 |
| 95.7 | % | 1,037,175 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's, The Ritz-Carlton (15) |
27
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name |
| State |
| City (CBSA) |
| Lease) (3) |
| Ownership |
| Acquired |
| Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Larger Retailers and Uses | |
27. | Fashion Mall at Keystone, The |
| IN |
| Indianapolis |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2067) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1997 |
| 93.6 | % | 716,744 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue, Crate Barrel, Nordstrom, Keystone Art Cinema, Sheraton (15) |
28. | Fashion Valley |
| CA |
| San Diego |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2001 |
| 98.0 | % | 1,728,009 |
| Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, AMC Theatres, Forever 21, The Container Store |
29. | Firewheel Town Center |
| TX |
| Garland (Dallas) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2005 |
| 89.4 | % | 996,245 |
| Dillard's, Macy's, Barnes Noble, DSW, AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, Kids Empire/Hapik, Fairfield Inn by Marriott (14), (16) |
30. | Florida Mall, The |
| FL |
| Orlando |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 1986 |
| 96.8 | % | 1,724,998 |
| Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, HM, Forever 21, Zara, American Girl, Dick's Sporting Goods, Crayola Experience, The Florida Hotel and Conference Center (15) |
31. | Forum Shops at Caesars Palace, The |
| NV |
| Las Vegas |
| Ground Lease (2050) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1992 |
| 96.2 | % | 659,765 |
| Caesars Palace Las Vegas Hotel and Casino (15) |
32. | Galleria, The |
| TX |
| Houston |
| Fee |
| 50.4 | % (4) | Acquired 2002 |
| 96.0 | % | 2,012,383 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's, The Westin Galleria (15), The Westin Oaks (15), Life Time Tennis |
33. | Greenwood Park Mall |
| IN |
| Greenwood (Indianapolis) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1979 |
| 97.7 | % | 1,286,654 |
| Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes Noble, Regal Cinema, Dave Buster's |
34. | Haywood Mall |
| SC |
| Greenville |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2067) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 98.0 | % | 1,237,364 |
| Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Belk |
35. | King of Prussia |
| PA |
| King of Prussia (Philadelphia) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2003 |
| 96.9 | % | 2,670,696 |
| Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Arhaus Furniture, Dick's Sporting Goods, Primark |
36. | La Plaza Mall |
| TX |
| McAllen |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2040) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1976 |
| 98.1 | % | 1,314,285 |
| Macy's (8), Dillard's, JCPenney, Wingate by Wyndham (15) |
37. | Lakeline Mall |
| TX |
| Cedar Park (Austin) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1995 |
| 97.3 | % | 1,098,856 |
| Dillard's (8), Macy's, JCPenney, AMC Theatres |
38. | Lehigh Valley Mall |
| PA |
| Whitehall |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2003 |
| 94.4 | % | 1,196,373 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, Boscov's, Barnes Noble, Michael's, Dave Buster's |
39. | Lenox Square |
| GA |
| Atlanta |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 96.6 | % | 1,553,502 |
| Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Macy's, JW Marriott (15), Hyatt Centric (14) |
40. | Livingston Mall |
| NJ |
| Livingston (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 94.7 | % | 968,748 |
| Macy's, Barnes Noble |
41. | Mall at Rockingham Park, The |
| NH |
| Salem (Boston) |
| Fee |
| 28.2 | % (4) | Acquired 1999 |
| 92.3 | % | 1,064,794 |
| JCPenney, Macy's, Dick's Sporting Goods, Cinemark Theatre |
42. | Mall of Georgia |
| GA |
| Buford (Atlanta) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1999 |
| 94.8 | % | 1,840,342 |
| Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes Noble, Havertys Furniture, Regal Cinema, Von Maur |
43. | Mall of New Hampshire, The |
| NH |
| Manchester |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2024-2027) (7) |
| 56.4 | % (4) | Acquired 1999 |
| 92.7 | % | 803,883 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dave Buster's |
44. | McCain Mall |
| AR |
| N. Little Rock |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1973 |
| 95.0 | % | 793,852 |
| Dillard's, JCPenney, Regal Cinema |
45. | Meadowood Mall |
| NV |
| Reno |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 99.2 | % | 928,920 |
| Macy's (8), JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Crunch Fitness, Round 1 |
46. | Menlo Park Mall |
| NJ |
| Edison (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1997 |
| 90.4 | % | 1,331,605 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's, Barnes Noble, AMC Dine-In Theatre |
47. | Miami International Mall |
| FL |
| Miami |
| Fee |
| 47.8 | % (4) | Built 1982 |
| 92.8 | % | 1,082,365 |
| Macy's (8), JCPenney, Kohl's |
48. | Midland Park Mall |
| TX |
| Midland |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1980 |
| 100.0 | % | 644,281 |
| Dillard's (8), JCPenney, Ross, Dick's Sporting Goods |
49. | Miller Hill Mall |
| MN |
| Duluth |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1973 |
| 94.9 | % | 829,535 |
| JCPenney, Barnes Noble, DSW, Dick's Sporting Goods, Essentia Health West, Essentia Health East |
50. | North East Mall |
| TX |
| Hurst (Dallas) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1971 |
| 97.3 | % | 1,646,409 |
| Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Cinemark Theatres |
51. | Northshore Mall |
| MA |
| Peabody (Boston) |
| Fee |
| 56.4 | % (4) | Acquired 1999 |
| 92.1 | % | 1,509,844 |
| JCPenney, Nordstrom, Macy's (8), Barnes Noble, Shaw's Grocery, The Container Store, Tesla Sales and Service, Life Time Athletic |
52. | Ocean County Mall |
| NJ |
| Toms River (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 86.4 | % | 886,603 |
| Macy's, Boscov's, JCPenney, LA Fitness, HomeSense, Ulta |
53. | Orland Square |
| IL |
| Orland Park (Chicago) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1997 |
| 99.4 | % | 1,229,884 | Macy's, JCPenney, Dave Buster's, Von Maur | |
54. | Oxford Valley Mall |
| PA |
| Langhorne (Philadelphia) |
| Fee |
| 85.5 | % | Acquired 2003 |
| 79.0 | % | 1,340,258 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, United Artists Theatre |
55. | Penn Square Mall |
| OK |
| Oklahoma City |
| Ground Lease (2060) |
| 94.5 | % | Acquired 2002 |
| 94.5 | % | 1,083,693 |
| Macy's, Dillard's (8), JCPenney, AMC Theatres, The Container Store |
56. | Pheasant Lane Mall |
| NH |
| Nashua |
| - |
| — | % (12) | Acquired 2002 |
| 94.4 | % | 979,595 |
| JCPenney, Target, Macy's, Dick's Sporting Goods |
28
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name |
| State |
| City (CBSA) |
| Lease) (3) |
| Ownership |
| Acquired |
| Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Larger Retailers and Uses | |
57. | Phipps Plaza |
| GA |
| Atlanta |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 93.2 | % | 785,367 | Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, AMC Theatres, Arhaus Furniture, Legoland Discovery Center, AC Hotel by Marriott, Life Time Athletic (6), Life Time Work (6), Nobu Hotel and Restaurant (6), (16) | |
58. | Plaza Carolina |
| PR |
| Carolina (San Juan) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 85.7 | % | 1,157,596 |
| JCPenney, Tiendas Capri, Econo, T.J. Maxx, Caribbean Cinemas, Burlington |
59. | Prien Lake Mall |
| LA |
| Lake Charles |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2040) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1972 |
| 88.3 | % | 719,189 |
| Dillard's, JCPenney, Cinemark Theatres, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods, T.J. Maxx/HomeGoods |
60. | Quaker Bridge Mall |
| NJ |
| Lawrenceville |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2003 |
| 95.1 | % | 1,081,297 |
| Macy's, JCPenney |
61. | Rockaway Townsquare |
| NJ |
| Rockaway (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 81.8 | % | 1,245,980 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, Raymour Flanigan |
62. | Roosevelt Field |
| NY |
| Garden City (New York) |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2090) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 97.5 | % | 2,344,758 |
| Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Entertainment, XSport Fitness, Neiman Marcus, Primark (6), Residence Inn by Marriott |
63. | Ross Park Mall |
| PA |
| Pittsburgh |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1986 |
| 96.0 | % | 1,234,239 |
| JCPenney, Nordstrom, L.L. Bean, Macy's (8), Crate Barrel |
64. | Santa Rosa Plaza |
| CA |
| Santa Rosa |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 93.1 | % | 693,075 |
| Macy's, Forever 21 |
65. | Shops at Chestnut Hill, The |
| MA |
| Chestnut Hill (Boston) |
| Fee |
| 94.4 | % | Acquired 2002 |
| 97.9 | % | 470,062 |
| Bloomingdale's (8) |
66. | Shops at Clearfork, The |
| TX |
| Fort Worth |
| Fee |
| 45.0 | % (4) | Built 2017 |
| 86.2 | % | 550,748 |
| Neiman Marcus, Arhaus Furniture, AMC Theatres, Pinstripes, (16) |
67. | Shops at Crystals, The |
| NV |
| Las Vegas |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2016 |
| 87.0 | % | 272,248 |
| Aria Resort and Casino (15) |
68. | Shops at Nanuet, The |
| NY |
| Nanuet |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Redeveloped 2013 |
| 79.6 | % | 757,952 |
| Regal Cinema, 24 Hour Fitness, At Home, Stop Shop |
69. | Shops at Mission Viejo, The |
| CA |
| Mission Viejo (Los Angeles) |
| Fee |
| 51.0 | % (4) | Built 1979 |
| 89.7 | % | 1,235,413 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's (8), Dick's Sporting Goods |
70. | Shops at Riverside, The |
| NJ |
| Hackensack (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 91.4 | % | 723,506 |
| Bloomingdale's, Barnes Noble, Arhaus Furniture, AMC Theatres, Life Time Studio |
71. | Smith Haven Mall |
| NY |
| Lake Grove (New York) |
| Fee |
| 25.0 | % (4) (2) | Acquired 1995 |
| 91.7 | % | 1,204,769 |
| Macy's (8), Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes Noble, L.L. Bean |
72. | South Hills Village |
| PA |
| Pittsburgh |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1997 |
| 90.6 | % | 1,128,994 |
| Macy's (8), Barnes Noble, AMC Cinemas, Dick's Sporting Goods, Target, DSW, Ulta |
73. | South Shore Plaza |
| MA |
| Braintree (Boston) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 95.4 | % | 1,590,717 |
| Macy's, Sears, Nordstrom, Target, Primark |
74. | Southdale Center |
| MN |
| Edina (Minneapolis) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 88.0 | % | 1,246,152 |
| Macy's, AMC Theatres, Dave Buster's, RH Minneapolis, Life Time Athletic, Life Time Work/Sport, Homewood Suites by Hilton, (16) |
75. | SouthPark |
| NC |
| Charlotte |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2040) (9) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2002 |
| 99.0 | % | 1,688,480 |
| Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Crate Barrel, The Container Store, (16) |
76. | Springfield Mall (1) |
| PA |
| Springfield (Philadelphia) |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2005 |
| 88.4 | % | 610,134 |
| Macy's, Target |
77. | St. Charles Towne Center |
| MD |
| Waldorf (Washington, DC) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1990 |
| 89.8 | % | 980,450 |
| Macy's (8), JCPenney, Kohl's, Dick Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres |
78. | St. Johns Town Center |
| FL |
| Jacksonville |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 2005 |
| 95.2 | % | 1,454,187 |
| Nordstrom, Dillard's, Arhaus Furniture, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes Noble, RH Jacksonville, Homewood Suites by Hilton (15) |
| Target, Ashley Furniture Home Store, Ross, DSW, JoAnn Fabrics, PetsMart | ||||||||||||||||
79. | Stanford Shopping Center |
| CA |
| Palo Alto (San Jose) |
| Ground Lease (2064) |
| 94.4 | % (11) | Acquired 2003 |
| 91.9 | % | 1,287,980 |
| Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Crate and Barrel, The Container Store, RH Palo Alto (6) |
80. | Stoneridge Shopping Center |
| CA |
| Pleasanton (San Francisco) |
| Fee |
| 49.9 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 95.8 | % | 1,299,562 |
| Macy's (8), JCPenney, Arhaus Furniture (6) |
81. | Summit Mall |
| OH |
| Akron |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1965 |
| 91.6 | % | 774,483 |
| Dillard's (8), Macy's, Arhaus Furniture |
82. | Tacoma Mall |
| WA |
| Tacoma (Seattle) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1987 |
| 91.8 | % | 1,240,292 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Nordstrom Rack, Total Wine and More, Ulta, Kohl's (6) |
83. | Tippecanoe Mall |
| IN |
| Lafayette |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1973 |
| 81.5 | % | 864,844 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods |
29
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name |
| State |
| City (CBSA) |
| Lease) (3) |
| Ownership |
| Acquired |
| Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Larger Retailers and Uses | |
84. | Town Center at Boca Raton |
| FL |
| Boca Raton (Miami) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 98.0 | % | 1,778,770 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Crate Barrel, The Container Store, Joseph's Classic Market, Arhaus Furniture |
85. | Towne East Square |
| KS |
| Wichita |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1975 |
| 99.3 | % | 1,157,209 |
| Dillard's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Round 1, Scheels (6) |
86. | Treasure Coast Square |
| FL |
| Jensen Beach |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1987 |
| 88.6 | % | 874,998 |
| Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Regal Cinema |
87. | Tyrone Square |
| FL |
| St. Petersburg (Tampa) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1972 |
| 90.0 | % | 960,554 |
| Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, DSW, Cobb 10 Luxury Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, Hitchcock's Green Market, PetSmart |
88. | University Park Mall |
| IN |
| Mishawaka |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 1979 |
| 91.8 | % | 918,673 |
| Macy's, JCPenney, Barnes Noble |
89. | Walt Whitman Shops |
| NY |
| Huntington Station (New York) |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2032) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 1998 |
| 99.1 | % | 1,084,648 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale’s, Macy’s |
90. | West Town Mall |
| TN |
| Knoxville |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2042) |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 1991 |
| 93.9 | % | 1,282,015 |
| Belk (8), Dillard’s, JCPenney, Regal Cinebarre Theatre, Dick's House of Sport, Tesla Sales and Service |
91. | Westchester, The |
| NY |
| White Plains (New York) |
| Fee |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 1997 |
| 91.0 | % | 805,135 |
| Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Crate and Barrel, Arhaus Furniture (6) |
92. | White Oaks Mall |
| IL |
| Springfield |
| Fee |
| 80.7 | % | Built 1977 |
| 81.5 | % | 942,837 |
| Macy's, Dick's Sporting Goods, LA Fitness, Michael's, State of Illinois Department of Central Management Services (6) |
93. | Wolfchase Galleria |
| TN |
| Memphis |
| Fee |
| 94.5 | % | Acquired 2002 |
| 96.6 | % | 1,151,481 |
| Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Malco Theatres, Courtyard by Marriott (14) |
94. | Woodfield Mall |
| IL |
| Schaumburg (Chicago) |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2012 |
| 93.0 | % | 2,154,014 |
| Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Enterrium, Peppa Pig World of Play |
95. | Woodland Hills Mall |
| OK |
| Tulsa |
| Fee |
| 94.5 | % | Acquired 2002 |
| 96.1 | % | 1,095,915 |
| Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Holiday Inn Express (15), Courtyard by Marriott (15) |
Total Mall GLA | 108,070,914 | (18) |
30
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | Or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name | State | City (CBSA) | Lease) (3) | Ownership | Acquired | Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |||||||
Premium Outlets | |||||||||||||||||
1. | Albertville Premium Outlets |
| MN |
| Albertville (Minneapolis) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 89.3 | % | 337,689 |
| Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Under Armour |
2. | Allen Premium Outlets |
| TX |
| Allen (Dallas) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 100.0 | % | 548,464 |
| Adidas, Armani Outlet, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Staybridge Suites (14), The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
3. | Aurora Farms Premium Outlets |
| OH |
| Aurora (Cleveland) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 83.2 | % | 271,209 |
| Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
4. | Birch Run Premium Outlets |
| MI |
| Birch Run (Detroit) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 88.7 | % | 593,931 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Pottery Barn/Williams-Sonoma Outlet, Tommy Hilfiger, The North Face, Under Armour |
5. | Camarillo Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Camarillo (Los Angeles) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 94.3 | % | 686,106 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Giorgio Armani, HM, Kate Spade New York, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
6. | Carlsbad Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Carlsbad (San Diego) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 98.5 | % | 289,087 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
7. | Carolina Premium Outlets |
| NC |
| Smithfield (Raleigh) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 97.6 | % | 438,728 |
| Adidas, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
8. | Charlotte Premium Outlets |
| NC |
| Charlotte |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 2014 |
| 96.9 | % | 398,351 |
| Adidas, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
9. | Chicago Premium Outlets |
| IL |
| Aurora (Chicago) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2004 |
| 92.7 | % | 687,119 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, RH Outlet, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Under Armour |
10. | Cincinnati Premium Outlets |
| OH |
| Monroe (Cincinnati) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2009 |
| 89.7 | % | 398,960 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
11. | Clarksburg Premium Outlets |
| MD |
| Clarksburg (Washington, DC) |
| Fee |
| 66.0 | % (4) | Built 2016 |
| 88.4 | % | 390,146 |
| Armani Outlet, A/X Armani Exchange, Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Express, Kate Spade New York, Lafayette 148 New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Vince |
12. | Clinton Premium Outlets |
| CT |
| Clinton |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 98.9 | % | 276,225 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
13. | Denver Premium Outlets |
| CO |
| Thornton (Denver) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2018 |
| 100.0 | % | 328,100 |
| Adidas, A/X Armani Exchange, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, HM, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Vineyard Vines, Staybridge Suites (15) |
14. | Desert Hills Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Cabazon (Palm Springs) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 99.4 | % | 655,235 |
| Alexander McQueen, Armani Outlet, Balenciaga, Bottega Veneta, Brunello Cucinelli, Burberry, Coach, Ermenegildo Zegna, Fendi, Gucci, Jimmy Choo, Loro Piana, Marc Jacobs, Moncler, Mulberry, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Saint Laurent Paris, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Stuart Weitzman, Tory Burch, Valentino |
15. | Ellenton Premium Outlets |
| FL |
| Ellenton (Tampa) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 96.1 | % | 477,137 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
16. | Folsom Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Folsom (Sacramento) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 83.9 | % | 298,038 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
17. | Gilroy Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Gilroy (San Jose) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 82.0 | % | 578,505 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger |
31
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | Or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name | State | City (CBSA) | Lease) (3) | Ownership | Acquired | Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |||||||
18. | Gloucester Premium Outlets |
| NJ |
| Blackwood (Philadelphia) |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 2015 |
| 85.8 | % | 378,470 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, Levi's, J. Crew, Loft Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Skechers, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, Vera Bradley |
19. | Grand Prairie Premium Outlets |
| TX |
| Grand Prairie (Dallas) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2012 |
| 98.7 | % | 423,687 |
| Banana Republic, Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Kate Spade New York, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
20. | Grove City Premium Outlets |
| PA |
| Grove City (Pittsburgh) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 83.2 | % | 531,157 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
21. | Gulfport Premium Outlets |
| MS |
| Gulfport |
| Ground Lease (2059) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 86.6 | % | 300,160 |
| Banana Republic, Chico's, Coach, Gap Outlet, HM, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
22. | Hagerstown Premium Outlets |
| MD |
| Hagerstown (Baltimore/ Washington, DC) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 73.1 | % | 485,592 |
| Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Loft Outlet, The North Face, Under Armour |
23. | Houston Premium Outlets |
| TX |
| Cypress (Houston) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2008 |
| 99.1 | % | 548,188 |
| Ann Taylor, A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Giorgio Armani, Holiday Inn Express (15), Kate Spade New York, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Victoria's Secret |
24. | Indiana Premium Outlets |
| IN |
| Edinburgh (Indianapolis) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 89.5 | % | 378,024 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
25. | Jackson Premium Outlets |
| NJ |
| Jackson (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 96.0 | % | 285,603 |
| Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Loft Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
26. | Jersey Shore Premium Outlets |
| NJ |
| Tinton Falls (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2008 |
| 97.6 | % | 434,456 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
27. | Johnson Creek Premium Outlets |
| WI |
| Johnson Creek |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 83.6 | % | 277,672 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Gap Outlet, Loft Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
28. | Kittery Premium Outlets |
| ME |
| Kittery |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2049) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 83.8 | % | 259,480 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Express Factory Outlet, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, New Balance, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Tumi |
29. | Las Americas Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| San Diego |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 96.5 | % | 554,273 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Giorgio Armani, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
30. | Las Vegas North Premium Outlets |
| NV |
| Las Vegas |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2003 |
| 95.9 | % | 676,270 |
| All Saints, Armani Outlet, A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Burberry, Canali, CH Carolina Herrera, Cheesecake Factory, Coach, David Yurman, Dolce Gabbana, Etro, Jimmy Choo, John Varvatos, Lululemon, Kate Spade New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Roberto Cavalli, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Shake Shack, Tory Burch |
31. | Las Vegas South Premium Outlets |
| NV |
| Las Vegas |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 98.4 | % | 535,759 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
32. | Lee Premium Outlets |
| MA |
| Lee |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 86.9 | % | 224,731 |
| Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Levi's, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Skechers, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
32
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | Or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name | State | City (CBSA) | Lease) (3) | Ownership | Acquired | Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |||||||
33. | Leesburg Premium Outlets |
| VA |
| Leesburg (Washington, DC) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 97.0 | % | 478,218 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, A/X Armani Exchange, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, RH Outlet, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Vineyard Vines, Williams-Sonoma |
34. | Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets |
| IN |
| Michigan City (Chicago, IL) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 89.4 | % | 454,787 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, HM, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
35. | Merrimack Premium Outlets |
| NH |
| Merrimack |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2012 |
| 97.8 | % | 408,891 |
| Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Barbour, Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Vineyard Vines |
36. | Napa Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Napa |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 90.5 | % | 179,427 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger |
37. | Norfolk Premium Outlets |
| VA |
| Norfolk |
| Fee |
| 65.0 | % (4) | Built 2017 |
| 89.0 | % | 332,281 |
| A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, HM, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
38. | North Bend Premium Outlets |
| WA |
| North Bend (Seattle) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 78.1 | % | 215,272 |
| Banana Republic, Coach, Gap Outlet, Levi's, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Skechers, Under Armour |
39. | North Georgia Premium Outlets |
| GA |
| Dawsonville (Atlanta) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 93.3 | % | 540,752 |
| Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Pottery Barn, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, West Elm, Williams-Sonoma |
40. | Orlando International Premium Outlets |
| FL |
| Orlando |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 96.2 | % | 773,527 |
| Adidas, Armani Outlet, Calvin Klein, Carhartt, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, HM, J.Crew, Karl Lagerfeld, Kate Spade New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, St. John, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
41. | Orlando Vineland Premium Outlets |
| FL |
| Orlando |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 99.8 | % | 656,784 |
| Adidas, All Saints, Armani Outlet, Bally, Bottega Veneta, Brunello Cucinelli, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Carolina Herrera, Coach, Ermenegildo Zegna, Jimmy Choo, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Prada, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, TAG Heuer, The North Face, Tod's, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Versace |
42. | Petaluma Village Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Petaluma (San Francisco) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 83.6 | % | 201,656 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger |
43. | Philadelphia Premium Outlets |
| PA |
| Limerick (Philadelphia) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2007 |
| 93.6 | % | 549,155 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, HM, J.Crew, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, RH Outlet, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
44. | Phoenix Premium Outlets |
| AZ |
| Chandler (Phoenix) |
| Ground Lease (2077) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2013 |
| 96.0 | % | 356,508 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Factory Store, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Tumi, Under Armour |
45. | Pismo Beach Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Pismo Beach | Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 89.3 | % | 147,603 |
| Calvin Klein, Coach, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Levi's, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Skechers, Tommy Hilfiger | |
46. | Pleasant Prairie Premium Outlets |
| WI |
| Pleasant Prairie (Chicago, IL/ Milwaukee) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 88.9 | % | 402,411 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, J.Crew, Lacoste, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
47. | Puerto Rico Premium Outlets |
| PR |
| Barceloneta |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 97.1 | % | 349,884 |
| Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Invicta, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Tommy Hilfiger |
33
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | Or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name | State | City (CBSA) | Lease) (3) | Ownership | Acquired | Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |||||||
48. | Queenstown Premium Outlets |
| MD |
| Queenstown (Baltimore) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 90.2 | % | 289,695 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, St. John, Tommy Bahama, Under Armour |
49. | Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets |
| TX |
| Mercedes (McAllen) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2006 |
| 87.0 | % | 603,929 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, HM, Kate Spade New York, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, Pandora, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
50. | Round Rock Premium Outlets |
| TX |
| Round Rock (Austin) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2006 |
| 97.2 | % | 498,398 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Duluth Trading Company, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, Embassy Suites (15) (6), (16) |
51. | San Francisco Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Livermore (San Francisco) |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2026) (9) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2012 |
| 97.3 | % | 696,898 |
| All Saints, Arc'teryx, A/X Armani Exchange, Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Bottega Veneta, Brunello Cucinelli, Burberry, CH Carolina Herrera, Coach, Ermenegildo Zegna, Etro, Furla, Gucci, HM, Jimmy Choo, John Varvatos, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Longchamp, MaxMara, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Roger Vivier, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sandro Maje, Salvatore Ferragamo, Stuart Weitzman, The North Face, Tod's, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Versace, Zadig et Voltaire |
52. | San Marcos Premium Outlets |
| TX |
| San Marcos (Austin/ San Antonio) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 95.4 | % | 735,135 |
| Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Burberry, CH Carolina Herrera, Gucci, J. Crew, Jimmy Choo, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Lululemon, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Pandora, Polo Ralph Lauren, Pottery Barn, Prada, RH Outlet, Saint Laurent Paris, Salvatore Ferragamo, Stuart Weitzman, The North Face, Tommy Bahama, Tory Burch, Versace, Vineyard Vines |
53. | Seattle Premium Outlets |
| WA |
| Tulalip (Seattle) |
| Ground Lease (2079) |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2005 |
| 95.3 | % | 554,515 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Arc'teryx, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Kate Spade New York, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Stuart Weitzman, The North Face, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
54. | Silver Sands Premium Outlets |
| FL |
| Destin |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2012 |
| 91.4 | % | 451,004 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Vera Bradley |
55. | St. Augustine Premium Outlets |
| FL |
| St. Augustine (Jacksonville) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 96.6 | % | 327,713 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lucky Brand, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, St. John, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
56. | St. Louis Premium Outlets |
| MO |
| St. Louis (Chesterfield) |
| Fee |
| 60.0 | % (4) | Built 2013 |
| 93.4 | % | 351,424 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, HM, J. Crew, Kate Spade New York, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Tommy Hilfiger, Ugg, Under Armour, Vera Bradley |
57. | Tampa Premium Outlets |
| FL |
| Lutz (Tampa) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2015 |
| 99.4 | % | 459,687 |
| Adidas, A/X Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, BJ's Restaurant and Brewhouse, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J. Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lucky Brand, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Saks 5th Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Tumi, Under Armour |
58. | Tanger Outlets - Columbus (1) |
| OH |
| Sunbury (Columbus) |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 2016 |
| 95.0 | % | 355,243 |
| Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Kate Spade New York, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Under Armour |
59. | Tanger Outlets - Galveston/Houston (1) |
| TX |
| Texas City |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 2012 |
| 90.2 | % | 352,705 |
| Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Tommy Hilfiger |
60. | The Crossings Premium Outlets |
| PA |
| Tannersville |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2029) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 98.6 | % | 411,925 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Johnny Rockets, Kate Spade New York, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, Vera Bradley |
34
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | Or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name | State | City (CBSA) | Lease) (3) | Ownership | Acquired | Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |||||||
61. | Tucson Premium Outlets |
| AZ |
| Marana (Tucson) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Built 2015 |
| 76.8 | % | 363,470 |
| Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Johnny Rockets, Levi’s, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks 5th Avenue Off 5th, Skechers, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
62. | Twin Cities Premium Outlets |
| MN |
| Eagan |
| Fee |
| 35.0 | % (4) | Built 2014 |
| 88.7 | % | 408,976 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J. Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Under Armour |
63. | Vacaville Premium Outlets |
| CA |
| Vacaville |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 90.9 | % | 447,255 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Skechers, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, West Elm Outlet |
64. | Waikele Premium Outlets |
| HI |
| Waipahu (Honolulu) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 97.0 | % | 219,485 |
| Adidas, Armani Outlet, Calvin Klein, Coach, Furla, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Swarovski, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch |
65. | Waterloo Premium Outlets |
| NY |
| Waterloo |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 74.4 | % | 421,862 |
| American Eagle Outfitters, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Chico’s, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, HM, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Levi's, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Skechers, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour |
66. | Williamsburg Premium Outlets |
| VA |
| Williamsburg |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2010 |
| 91.6 | % | 518,979 |
| Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Levi's, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, New Balance, Nike, Pandora, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, The North Face, Timberland, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, Vera Bradley, Vineyard Vines |
67. | Woodburn Premium Outlets |
| OR |
| Woodburn (Portland) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2013 |
| 91.7 | % | 389,511 |
| Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, The North Face, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour |
68. | Woodbury Common Premium Outlets |
| NY |
| Central Valley (New York) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 98.0 | % | 910,991 |
| Arc'teryx, Armani Outlet, Balenciaga, Balmain, Bottega Veneta, Breitling, Brioni, Brunello Cucinelli, Burberry, Canali, Celine, Chloe, Coach, Dior, Dolce Gabbana, Dunhill, Fendi, Givenchy, Golden Goose, Gucci, Jimmy Choo, Lacoste, Loewe, Longchamp, Loro Piana, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Moncler, Mulberry, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Saint Laurent, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Santoni, Shake Shack, Stone Island, Stuart Weitzman, Theory, Tod's, Tom Ford, Tory Burch, Valentino, Versace, Zegna |
69. | Wrentham Village Premium Outlets |
| MA |
| Wrentham (Boston) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2004 |
| 98.7 | % | 672,872 |
| Adidas, All Saints, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, David Yurman, Gucci, Karl Lagerfeld, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Lululemon, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Puma, RH Outlet, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Vineyard Vines |
Total U.S. Premium Outlets GLA | 30,435,380 |
35
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Expiration if | Legal | or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name |
| State |
| City (CBSA) |
| Lease) (3) |
| Ownership |
| Acquired |
| Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |
The Mills | |||||||||||||||||
1. | Arizona Mills |
| AZ |
| Tempe (Phoenix) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 90.7 | % | 1,223,952 |
| Marshalls, Burlington, Ross, Harkins Cinemas IMAX, Sea Life Center, Conn's, Legoland, Forever 21, dd's Discounts (6), Going, Going, Gone by Dick's Sporting Goods, Rainforest Café |
2. | Arundel Mills |
| MD |
| Hanover (Baltimore) |
| Fee |
| 59.3 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 99.8 | % | 1,929,935 |
| Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Burlington, Dave Buster's, Medieval Times, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, T.J. Maxx, Cinemark Egyptian 24 Theatres, Maryland Live! Casino, Forever 21, Ulta, Live! Hotel (14), Sun Ski |
3. | Colorado Mills |
| CO |
| Lakewood (Denver) |
| Fee |
| 37.5 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 93.3 | % | 1,416,677 |
| Forever 21, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Super Target, United Artists Theatre, Burlington, HM, Dick's Sporting Goods, Rodz Bodz Museum Movie Cars More, Slick City Action Park (6), Springhill Suites (15) |
4. | Concord Mills |
| NC |
| Concord (Charlotte) |
| Fee |
| 59.3 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 99.0 | % | 1,334,473 |
| Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Burlington, Dave Buster's, Nike Factory Store, Off Broadway Shoes, AMC Theatres, Best Buy, Forever 21, Sea Life Center, HM, Dick's Sporting Goods |
5. | Grapevine Mills |
| TX |
| Grapevine (Dallas) |
| Fee |
| 59.3 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 99.1 | % | 1,781,299 |
| Burlington, Marshalls, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, AMC Theatres, Sun Ski Sports, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Legoland Discovery Center, Sea Life Center, Ross, HM, Round 1 Entertainment, Fieldhouse USA, Rainforest Café, Meow Wolf (6), Macy's Backstage (6), Springhill Suites (15), Hyatt Place (15), Hawthorn (15) |
6. | Great Mall |
| CA |
| Milpitas (San Jose) |
| Fee and Ground Lease (2049) (7) |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 97.8 | % | 1,368,827 |
| Camille La Vie, Kohl's, Dave Buster's, Burlington, Marshalls, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Nike Factory Store, Century Theatres, Bed Bath Beyond (13), Dick's Sporting Goods, Legoland Discovery Center |
7. | Gurnee Mills |
| IL |
| Gurnee (Chicago) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 95.7 | % | 1,802,880 |
| Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath Beyond/Buy Buy Baby, Burlington, Kohl's, Marshalls Home Goods, Marcus Cinemas, Value City Furniture, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Macy's, Floor Decor, Dick's Sporting Goods, Rainforest Café, The Room Place, 2nd and Charles, Hobby Lobby (6) |
8. | Katy Mills |
| TX |
| Katy (Houston) |
| Fee |
| 62.5 | % (4) (2) | Acquired 2007 |
| 92.3 | % | 1,786,507 |
| Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Books-A-Million, Burlington, Marshalls, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sun Ski Sports, AMC Theatres, Tilt, Ross, HM, RH Outlet, Rainforest Café |
9. | Mills at Jersey Gardens, The |
| NJ |
| Elizabeth |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2015 |
| 100.0 | % | 1,296,113 |
| Burlington, Cohoes, Forever 21, AMC Theatres, Marshalls, Nike Factory Store, Saks 5th Avenue Off 5th, HM, Tommy Hilfiger, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Residence Inn (15), Courtyard by Marriott (15), Embassy Suites (15), Country Inn Suites (15) |
10. | Ontario Mills |
| CA |
| Ontario (Riverside) |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2007 |
| 99.9 | % | 1,421,863 |
| Burlington, Nike Factory Store, Marshalls, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Nordstrom Rack, Dave Buster's, Camille La Vie, Sam Ash Music, AMC Theatres, Forever 21, Uniqlo, Skechers Superstore, Rainforest Café, Aki Home |
11. | Opry Mills |
| TN |
| Nashville |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 98 | % | 1,177,549 |
| Regal Cinema IMAX, Dave Buster's, Sun Ski, Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Forever 21, HM, Madame Tussauds, Rainforest Café, Aquarium Restaurant |
12. | Outlets at Orange, The |
| CA |
| Orange (Los Angeles) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 99.8 | % | 866,975 |
| Dave Buster’s, Vans Skatepark, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, AMC Theatres, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nordstrom Rack, Bloomingdale's the Outlet Store, Guitar Center, Nike Factory Store |
13. | Potomac Mills |
| VA |
| Woodbridge (Washington, DC) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 99.8 | % | 1,555,876 |
| Marshalls, T.J. Maxx, JCPenney, Burlington, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th Outlet, Costco Warehouse, AMC Theatres, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Buy Buy Baby/and That!, Round 1 |
14. | Sawgrass Mills |
| FL |
| Sunrise (Miami) |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2007 |
| 97.2 | % | 2,327,642 |
| Bed Bath Beyond, BrandsMart USA, Burlington, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Super Target, T.J. Maxx, Regal Cinema, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Dick's Sporting Goods, Primark, AC Hotel by Marriott |
Total Mills Properties GLA | 21,290,568 |
36
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
(Expiration if | Legal | or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name |
| State |
| City (CBSA) |
| Lease) (3) |
| Ownership |
| Acquired |
| Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |
Lifestyle Centers | |||||||||||||||||
1. | ABQ Uptown |
| NM |
| Albuquerque |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2011 |
| 99.3 | % | 228,563 |
| Anthropologie, Apple, Pottery Barn |
2. | Hamilton Town Center |
| IN |
| Noblesville (Indianapolis) |
| Fee |
| 50.0 | % (4) | Built 2008 |
| 94.7 | % | 675,141 |
| JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Bed Bath Beyond, DSW, Emagine Noblesville, Total Wine More (6), BJ's Wholesale (6) |
3. | Liberty Tree Mall |
| MA |
| Danvers (Boston) |
| Fee |
| 49.1 | % (4) | Acquired 1999 |
| 78.7 | % | 860,222 |
| Marshalls, Target, Kohl's, Best Buy, Staples, AMC Theatres, Nordstrom Rack, Off Broadway Shoes, Sky Zone, Total Wine More |
4. | Northgate Station |
| WA |
| Seattle |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Redeveloped 2021 |
| - | (17) | 416,236 | (17) | Kraken Community Iceplex, Barnes Noble, Bed Bath Beyond, Nordstrom Rack |
5. | Pier Park |
| FL |
| Panama City Beach |
| Fee |
| 65.6 | % (4) | Built 2008 |
| 95.9 | % | 948,329 |
| Dillard's, JCPenney, Target, Grand Theatres, Ron Jon Surf Shop, Margaritaville, Marshalls, Dave Buster's, Skywheel |
6. | University Park Village |
| TX |
| Fort Worth |
| Fee |
| 100.0 | % | Acquired 2015 |
| 98.2 | % | 170,016 |
| Anthropologie, Apple, Pottery Barn |
Total Lifestyle Centers GLA | 3,298,507 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Properties | |||||||||||||||||
1 - 13. | Other Properties |
| 9,423,545 |
| |||||||||||||
14 - 15. | TMLP |
| Acquired 2007 |
| 2,782,207 |
| |||||||||||
Total Other GLA | 12,205,752 | (18) | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Properties GLA | 175,301,121 |
37
Ownership Interest | Year Built | ||||||||||||||||
(Expiration if | Legal | or | |||||||||||||||
Property Name |
| State |
| City (CBSA) |
| Lease) (3) |
| Ownership |
| Acquired |
| Occupancy (5) |
| Total GLA |
| Selected Tenants | |
Domestic Taubman | |||||||||||||||||
1. | Beverly Center |
| CA |
| Los Angeles |
| Ground Lease (2054) |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 91.9 | % | 779,000 |
| Bloomingdale's, Macy's |
2. | Cherry Creek Shopping Center |
| CO |
| Denver |
| Ground Lease (2083) |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 97.1 | % | 1,037,000 |
| Macy's, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom |
3. | City Creek Center |
| UT |
| Salt Lake City |
| Ground Lease (2082) |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 99.8 | % | 623,000 |
| Macy's, Nordstrom |
4. | Country Club Plaza |
| MO |
| Kansas City |
| Fee |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 81.6 | % | 965,000 |
| Barnes Noble, Brio Italian, Banana Republic |
5. | Dolphin Mall |
| FL |
| Miami |
| Fee |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 99.1 | % | 1,436,000 |
| Bass Pro Shops, Cobb Theatres, Burlington, Dave Busters |
6. | Fair Oaks Mall |
| VA |
| Fairfax |
| Fee |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 90.4 | % | 1,559,000 |
| JC Penney, Macy's (8), Dicks Sporting Goods |
7. | Gardens Mall, The |
| FL |
| Palm Beach Gardens |
| Fee |
| 38.8 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 92.6 | % | 1,383,000 |
| Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Nordstrom, Saks Fifth Avenue, Sears |
8. | Gardens on El Paseo, The |
| CA |
| Palm Desert |
| Fee |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 98.9 | % | 237,000 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue |
9. | Great Lakes Crossing Outlets |
| MI |
| Auburn Hills |
| Fee |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 93.6 | % | 1,356,000 |
| AMC Theatre, Bass Pro Shops, Burlington, Round 1, Nordstrom Rack |
10. | International Market Place |
| HI |
| Waikiki (Honolulu) |
| Ground Lease (2091) |
| 74.8 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 88.3 | % | 340,000 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue |
11. | International Plaza |
| FL |
| Tampa |
| Ground Lease (2080) |
| 40.1 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 97.8 | % | 1,178,000 |
| Dillard's, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, LifeTime Fitness |
12. | Mall at Green Hills, The |
| TN |
| Nashville |
| Fee |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 93.3 | % | 1,034,000 |
| Dillard's, Macy's, Nordstrom |
13. | Mall at Millenia, The |
| FL |
| Orlando |
| Fee |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 95 | % | 1,114,000 |
| Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman Marcus |
14. | Mall at Short Hills, The |
| NJ |
| Short Hills |
| Fee |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 98.2 | % | 1,408,000 |
| Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Industrious |
15. | Mall at University Town Center, The |
| FL |
| Sarasota |
| Fee |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 98.8 | % | 866,000 |
| Dillard's, Macy's, Saks Fifth Avenue |
16. | Mall of San Juan, The |
| PR |
| San Juan |
| Fee |
| 76.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 89.4 | % | 626,000 |
| HM, Zara, Pottery Barn, Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie |
17. | Sunvalley |
| CA |
| Concord |
| Ground Lease (2061) |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 97.9 | % | 1,324,000 |
| JC Penney, Macy's (8), Sears |
18. | Twelve Oaks Mall |
| MI |
| Novi |
| Fee |
| 80.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 95.3 | % | 1,522,000 |
| JC Penney, Macy's, Nordstrom |
19. | Waterside Shops |
| FL |
| Naples |
| Fee |
| 40.0 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 94.3 | % | 336,000 |
| Saks Fifth Avenue |
20. | Westfarms |
| CT |
| West Hartford |
| Fee |
| 63.2 | % (4) | Acquired 2020 |
| 94.6 | % | 1,266,000 |
| JC Penney, Macy's (8), Nordstrom |
Total Domestic Taubman Properties GLA | 20,389,000 |
38
FOOTNOTES:
| (1) | This property is managed by a third party. |
| (2) | Our direct and indirect interests in some of the properties held as joint venture interests are subject to preferences on distributions in favor of other partners or us. |
| (3) | The date listed is the expiration date of the last renewal option available to the operating entity under the ground lease. In a majority of the ground leases, we have a right to purchase the lessor’s interest under an option, right of first refusal or other provision. Unless otherwise indicated, each ground lease listed in this column covers at least 50% of its respective property. |
| (4) | Joint venture properties accounted for under the equity method. |
| (5) | Malls - Executed leases for all company-owned GLA in mall stores, excluding majors and anchors. Premium Outlets and The Mills - Executed leases for all company-owned GLA (or total center GLA). |
| (6) | Indicates box, anchor, major or project currently under development/construction or has announced plans for development. |
| (7) | Indicates ground lease covers less than 50% of the acreage of this property. |
| (8) | Tenant has multiple locations at this center. |
| (9) | Indicates ground lease covers outparcel only. |
| (10) | Tenant has an existing store at this center but will move to a new location. |
| (11) | We receive substantially all the economic benefit of the property due to a preference or advance. |
| (12) | We own a mortgage note that encumbers Pheasant Lane Mall that entitles us to 100% of the economics of this property. |
| (13) | Indicates anchor has announced its intent to close this location. |
| (14) | Indicates box, anchor, major or project currently under development/construction by a third party. |
| (15) | Owned by a third party. |
| (16) | Includes multi-family tenant on-site. |
| (17) | This property is undergoing significant renovation. |
| (18) | GLA includes office space. |
39
United States Lease Expirations
The following table summarizes lease expiration data for our U.S. malls and Premium Outlets, including Puerto Rico, as of December 31, 2021. The data presented does not consider the impact of renewal options that may be contained in leases and excludes data related to TRG.
U.S. MALLS AND PREMIUM OUTLETS LEASE EXPIRATIONS (1)
Avg. Base | Percentage of Gross | ||||||||||||
Number of | Minimum Rent | Annual Rental | |||||||||||
Year | Leases Expiring | Square Feet | PSF at 12/31/2021 | Revenues (2) | |||||||||
Inline Stores and Freestanding | |||||||||||||
Month to Month Leases | 555 | 1,782,236 | $ | 55.85 | 1.9 | % | |||||||
2022 | 2,832 | 10,341,505 | $ | 50.49 | 9.6 | % | |||||||
2023 | 2,744 | 10,870,312 | $ | 57.33 | 10.4 | % | |||||||
2024 | 2,545 | 10,148,796 | $ | 54.59 | 10.5 | % | |||||||
2025 | 1,559 | 6,342,247 | $ | 62.44 | 7.5 | % | |||||||
2026 | 1,506 | 5,711,401 | $ | 57.12 | 6.1 | % | |||||||
2027 | 941 | 3,996,411 | $ | 60.60 | 4.6 | % | |||||||
2028 | 749 | 3,388,618 | $ | 63.78 | 4.1 | % | |||||||
2029 | 735 | 3,151,125 | $ | 66.89 | 3.8 | % | |||||||
2030 | 457 | 2,159,987 | $ | 67.28 | 2.6 | % | |||||||
2031 | 294 | 1,600,032 | $ | 56.87 | 1.6 | % | |||||||
2032 and Thereafter | 467 | 2,158,120 | $ | 46.69 | 2.0 | % | |||||||
Specialty Leasing Agreements w/ terms in excess of 12 months | 2,597 | 6,874,720 | $ | 17.91 | 2.3 | % | |||||||
Anchors | |||||||||||||
Month to Month Leases | 1 | 138,409 | $ | 1.18 | 0.0 | % | |||||||
2022 | 2 | 338,166 | $ | 4.98 | 0.0 | % | |||||||
2023 | 16 | 2,110,674 | $ | 4.76 | 0.2 | % | |||||||
2024 | 16 | 1,465,287 | $ | 8.10 | 0.2 | % | |||||||
2025 | 17 | 1,676,634 | $ | 6.70 | 0.2 | % | |||||||
2026 | 16 | 1,702,455 | $ | 5.01 | 0.2 | % | |||||||
2027 | 12 | 1,682,163 | $ | 3.93 | 0.1 | % | |||||||
2028 | 6 | 622,099 | $ | 7.12 | 0.1 | % | |||||||
2029 | 5 | 556,306 | $ | 4.51 | 0.0 | % | |||||||
2030 | 7 | 754,336 | $ | 8.54 | 0.1 | % | |||||||
2031 | 5 | 427,004 | $ | 12.18 | 0.0 | % | |||||||
2032 and Thereafter | 22 | 2,323,486 | $ | 13.48 | 0.6 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Does not consider the impact of renewal options that may be contained in leases. |
| (2) | Annual rental revenues represent domestic 2021 consolidated and joint venture combined base rental revenue. |
40
International Properties
Our ownership interests in properties outside the United States are primarily owned through joint venture arrangements. With the exception of our Premium Outlets in Canada, all of our international properties are managed by related parties.
European Investments
At December 31, 2021, we owned 63,924,148 shares, or approximately 22.4%, of Klépierre, which had a quoted market price of $23.65 per share. Klépierre is a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in shopping centers located in 14 countries.
As of December 31, 2021, we had a controlling interest in a European investee with interests in 11 Designer Outlet properties. Ten of the outlet properties are located in Europe and one outlet property is located in Canada. Of the ten properties in Europe, two are in Italy, two are in the Netherlands, two are in the United Kingdom, and one each is in Austria, France, Germany, and Spain. As of December 31, 2021, our legal percentage ownership interests in these entities ranged from 23% to 94%.
We own a 14.6% interest in Value Retail PLC and affiliated entities, which own and operate nine luxury outlets throughout Europe. We also have a minority direct ownership in three of those outlets.
Other International Investments
We hold a 40% interest in nine operating joint venture properties in Japan, a 50% interest in five operating joint venture properties in South Korea, a 50% interest in two operating joint venture properties in Mexico, a 50% interest in two operating joint venture properties in Malaysia, a 50% interest in one operating joint venture in Thailand, and a 50% interest in three Premium Outlet operating joint venture properties in Canada. The nine Japanese Premium Outlets operate in various cities throughout Japan and comprise over 3.6 million square feet of GLA and were 99.8% leased as of December 31, 2021.
Our investment in TRG includes an interest in four operating joint venture properties located outside of the U.S.; two located in the People’s Republic of China and two located in South Korea. Our effective ownership in these centers, through our investment in TRG, ranges from 13.7% to 39.2%.
The following property tables summarize certain data for our international properties as of December 31, 2021 and do not include our equity investments in Klépierre, or our investment in Value Retail PLC and affiliated entities.
41
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Property Table
International Properties
|
| City |
| Ownership |
| SPG Effective |
|
| Total Gross |
|
| ||||
COUNTRY/Property Name | (Metropolitan area) | Interest | Ownership | Year Built | Leasable Area (1) | Selected Tenants |
| ||||||||
INTERNATIONAL PREMIUM OUTLETS | |||||||||||||||
JAPAN | |||||||||||||||
1. | Ami Premium Outlets | Ami (Tokyo) | Fee | 40.0 | % | 2009 | 315,000 | Adidas, Beams, Coach, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, TaylorMade, Tommy Hilfiger | |||||||
2. | Gotemba Premium Outlets | Gotemba City (Tokyo) | Fee | 40.0 | % | 2000 | 659,500 | Adidas, Armani, Balenciaga, Bally, Beams, Bottega Veneta, Burberry, Coach, Dolce Gabbana, Dunhill, Gap Outlet, Gucci, Loro Piana, Michael Kors, Moncler, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada/Miu Miu, Puma, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tod's, Tory Burch, United Arrows | |||||||
3. | Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets | Hyougo-ken (Osaka) | Ground Lease (2026) | 40.0 | % | 2007 | 441,000 | Adidas, Armani, Bally, Beams, Coach, Dolce Gabbana, Gap Outlet, Gucci, Kate Spade New York, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada/Miu Miu, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tod's, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows, Valentino | |||||||
4. | Rinku Premium Outlets | Izumisano (Osaka) | Ground Lease (2031) | 40.0 | % | 2000 | 512,500 | Adidas, Armani, Bally, Beams, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Coach, Dolce Gabbana, Dunhill, Eddie Bauer, Furla, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Lanvin Collection, Michael Kors, Nike, Olive des Olive, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Salvatore Ferragamo, TaylorMade, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows, Zara | |||||||
5. | Sano Premium Outlets | Sano (Tokyo) | Fee | 40.0 | % | 2003 | 390,800 | Adidas, Beams, Coach, Dunhill, Eddie Bauer, Etro, Furla, Gap Outlet, Gucci, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada/Miu Miu, Salvatore Ferragamo, TaylorMade | |||||||
6. | Sendai-Izumi Premium Outlets | Izumi Park Town (Sendai) | Ground Lease (2027) | 40.0 | % | 2008 | 164,200 | Adidas, Beams, Coach, Gap, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows | |||||||
7. | Shisui Premium Outlets | Shisui (Chiba), Japan | Ground Lease (2033) | 40.0 | % | 2013 | 434,600 | Adidas, Beams, Citizen, Coach, Dunhill, Furla, Gap, Kate Spade New York, Marmot, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Samsonite, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows | |||||||
8. | Toki Premium Outlets | Toki (Nagoya) | Ground Lease (2033) | 40.0 | % | 2005 | 367,700 | Adidas, Beams, Coach, Furla, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Nike, Olive des Olive, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows | |||||||
9. | Tosu Premium Outlets | Fukuoka (Kyushu) | Fee | 40.0 | % | 2004 | 328,400 | Adidas, Beams, Coach, Furla, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Olive des Olive, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows | |||||||
Subtotal Japan | 3,613,700 |
42
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Property Table
International Properties
|
| City |
| Ownership |
| SPG Effective |
|
| Total Gross |
|
| ||||
COUNTRY/Property Name | (Metropolitan area) | Interest | Ownership | Year Built | Leasable Area (1) | Selected Tenants |
| ||||||||
MEXICO | |||||||||||||||
10. | Punta Norte Premium Outlets | Mexico City | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2004 | 333,000 | Adidas, Calvin Klein, CH Carolina Herrera, Coach, Dolce Gabbana, Kate Spade New York, Nautica, Nike, Palacio Outlet, Salvatore Ferragamo, Zegna | |||||||
11. | Premium Outlets Querétaro | Querétaro | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2019 | 274,800 | Adidas, Adrianna Papell, Calvin Klein, Guess, Levi's, Nike, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour | |||||||
Subtotal Mexico | 607,800 | ||||||||||||||
SOUTH KOREA | |||||||||||||||
12. | Yeoju Premium Outlets | Yeoju (Seoul) | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2007 | 551,600 | Adidas, Armani, Burberry, Chloe, Coach, Fendi, Gucci, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tod's, Under Armour, Valentino, Vivienne Westwood | |||||||
13. | Paju Premium Outlets | Paju (Seoul) | Ground Lease (2040) | 50.0 | % | 2011 | 558,900 | Adidas, Armani, Bean Pole, Calvin Klein, Coach, Jill Stuart, Lanvin Collection, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Tory Burch, Under Armour, Vivienne Westwood | |||||||
14. | Busan Premium Outlets | Busan | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2013 | 360,200 | Adidas, Armani, Bean Pole, Calvin Klein, Coach, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger | |||||||
15. | Siehung Premium Outlets | Siehung | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2017 | 444,400 | Adidas, Armani, Bean Pole, Calvin Klein, Coach, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, The North Face, Under Armour | |||||||
16. | Jeju Premium Outlets | Jeju Province | Ground Lease (2041) | 50.0 | % | 2021 | 92,000 | Adidas, Arcteryx, Golden Goose, Guess, Hugo Boss, J. Lindeberg, Lacoste | |||||||
Subtotal South Korea | 2,007,100 | ||||||||||||||
MALAYSIA | |||||||||||||||
17. | Johor Premium Outlets | Johor (Singapore) | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2011 | 309,400 | Adidas, Armani, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Furla, Gucci, Guess, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Puma, Salvatore Ferragamo, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Zegna | |||||||
18. | Genting Highlands Premium Outlets | Kuala Lumpur | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2017 | 277,500 | Adidas, Coach, Furla, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Padini, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma | |||||||
Subtotal Malaysia | 586,900 | ||||||||||||||
THAILAND | |||||||||||||||
19. | Siam Premium Outlets Bangkok | Bangkok | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2020 | 264,000 | Adidas, Balenciage, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Furla, Kate Spade New York, Nike, Skechers, Under Armour | |||||||
Subtotal Thailand | 264,000 | ||||||||||||||
CANADA | |||||||||||||||
20. | Toronto Premium Outlets | Toronto (Ontario) | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2013 | 504,900 | Adidas, Armani, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap, Gucci, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Under Armour | |||||||
21. | Premium Outlets Montreal | Montreal (Quebec) | Fee | 50.0 | % | 2014 | 367,400 | Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour | |||||||
22. | Premium Outlet Collection Edmonton International Airport | Edmonton (Alberta) | Ground Lease (2072) | 50.0 | % | 2018 | 422,600 | Adidas, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Factory, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour | |||||||
Subtotal Canada | 1,294,900 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL INTERNATIONAL PREMIUM OUTLETS | 8,374,400 | ||||||||||||||
43
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Property Table
International Properties
|
| City |
| Ownership |
| SPG Effective |
|
| Total Gross |
|
| ||||
COUNTRY/Property Name | (Metropolitan area) | Interest | Ownership | Year Built | Leasable Area (1) | Selected Tenants |
| ||||||||
INTERNATIONAL DESIGNER OUTLETS | |||||||||||||||
AUSTRIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
1. | Parndorf Designer Outlet |
| Vienna | Fee | 90.0 | % | 2005 | 118,000 | Adidas, Armani, Bally, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Dolce Gabbana, Furla, Geox, Gucci, Guess, Michael Kors, Moncler, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Porsche Design, Prada, Puma, Tommy Hilfiger, Zegna | ||||||
Subtotal Austria | 118,000 | ||||||||||||||
ITALY | |||||||||||||||
2. | La Reggia Designer Outlet (2) |
| Marcianise (Naples) | Fee | 90.0 | % | 2010 | 344,000 | Adidas, Armani, Calvin Klein, Coach, Guess, Liu Jo, Michael Kors, Nike, Pinko, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger | ||||||
Phase 3 - 2021 | |||||||||||||||
3. | Noventa Di Piave Designer Outlet |
| Venice | Fee | 90.0 | % | 2008 | 353,000 | Adidas, Armani, Bally, Bottega Veneta, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Dolce Gabanna, Fendi, Furla, Gucci, Loro Piana, Michael Kors, Nike, Pinko, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Salvatore Ferragamo, Sergio Rossi,Tommy Hilfiger, Valentino, Versace, Zegna | ||||||
Subtotal Italy | 697,000 | ||||||||||||||
NETHERLANDS | |||||||||||||||
4. | Roermond Designer Outlet Phases 2 3 |
| Roermond | Fee | 90.0 | % | 2005 | 173,000 | Armani, Bally, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Furla, Gucci, Michael Kors, Moncler, Mulberry, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Swarovski, Tod's, Tommy Hilfiger, UGG, Zegna | ||||||
5. | Roermond Designer Outlet Phase 4 | Roermond | Fee | 46.1 | % | 2017 | 125,000 | Adidas, Karl Lagerfield, Liu Jo, Longchamp, Tag Heuer, Tom Tailor, Woolrich | |||||||
6. | Designer Outlet Roosendaal |
| Roosendaal | Fee | 94.0 | % | 2017 | 247,500 | Adidas, Calvin Klein, Esprit, Guess, Nike, Puma, S. Oliver, Tommy Hilfiger | ||||||
Subtotal Netherlands | 545,500 | ||||||||||||||
UNITED KINGDOM | |||||||||||||||
7. | Ashford Designer Outlet |
| Kent | Fee | 45.0 | % | 2000 | 281,000 | Adidas, Calvin Klein, Clarks, Fossil, French Connection, Gap, Guess, Kate Spade New York, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Superdry, Tommy Hilfiger | ||||||
8. | West Midlands Designer Outlet | Cannock (West Midlands) | Fee | 23.2 | % | 2021 | 197,000 | ||||||||
Subtotal England | 478,000 | ||||||||||||||
CANADA | |||||||||||||||
9. | Vancouver Designer Outlets |
| Vancouver | Ground Lease (2072) | 45.0 | % | 2015 | 326,000 | Adidas, Armani, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour | ||||||
Subtotal Canada | 326,000 | ||||||||||||||
GERMANY | |||||||||||||||
10. | Ochtrup Designer Outlets | Ochtrup | Fee | 70.5 | % | 2016 | 191,500 | Adidas, Calvin Klein, Guess, Lindt, Nike, Puma, Samsonite, Schiesser, Seidensticker, Steiff, Tom Tailor, Vero Moda | |||||||
Subtotal Germany | 191,500 | ||||||||||||||
FRANCE | |||||||||||||||
11. | Provence Designer Outlet | Miramas | Fee | 90.0 | % | 2017 | 269,000 | Armani, Calvin Klein, Guess, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Prada, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger | |||||||
Subtotal France | 269,000 | ||||||||||||||
SPAIN | |||||||||||||||
12. | Málaga Designer Outlet | Málaga | Fee | 46.1 | % | 2020 | 191,000 | Adidas, Armani, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Furla, Guess, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour | |||||||
Subtotal Spain | 191,000 | ||||||||||||||
Total International Designer Outlets | 2,816,000 | ||||||||||||||
44
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Property Table
International Properties
|
| City |
| Ownership |
| SPG Effective |
| Year Built |
| Total Gross |
| |||
COUNTRY/Property Name | (Metropolitan area) | Interest | Ownership | or Acquired | Leasable Area (1) | Selected Tenants | ||||||||
International Taubman | ||||||||||||||
China |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
1. | CityOn.Xian |
| Xi'an | Ground Lease (2051) | 20.0 | % | Acquired 2020 | 995,000 | Wangfujing | |||||
2. | CityOn.Zhengzhou |
| Zhengzhou | Ground Lease (2051) | 19.6 | % | Acquired 2020 | 919,000 | G-Super, Wangfujing | |||||
Subtotal China | 1,914,000 | |||||||||||||
South Korea | ||||||||||||||
3. | Starfield Anseong |
| Anseong | Fee | 39.2 | % | Acquired 2020 | 1,068,000 | Shinsegae, E-Mart Traders | |||||
4. | Starfield Hanam |
| Hanam | Fee | 13.7 | % | Acquired 2020 | 1,709,000 | Shinsegae, E-Mart Traders | |||||
Subtotal South Korea | 2,777,000 | |||||||||||||
Total International Taubman | 4,691,000 | |||||||||||||
FOOTNOTES:
| (1) | All gross leasable area listed in square feet. |
| (2) | Property completed an expansion in 2021. |
| (3) | Property is undergoing an expansion. |
45
Land
We have direct or indirect ownership interests in approximately 127 acres of land held in the United States and Canada for future development.
Sustainability
At Simon, we define and implement sustainability and Environmental, Social and Governance, or ESG, initiatives into all aspects of our business; from how we plan, develop, and operate our properties, to how we do business with our customers, engage with our communities, and create a healthy, safe, productive, and positive work environment for our employees. Our sustainability framework focuses on four key areas: Customers, Communities, Environment, and Employees.
The health and safety of all who work in and visit our properties has and continues to be our top priority, and beginning in 2020 and sustained through 2021, we enrolled and successfully achieved the International WELL Building Institute’s (WELL) third party verified WELL Health-Safety Rating for Facility Operations and Management for over 200 properties in our portfolio. This rating was earned primarily as a result of our emergency management program and the implementation of Simon’s rigorous COVID-19 exposure mitigation protocols. To learn more about our Health-Safety efforts and rating visit: www.simon.com/health.
Since 2003, we have measured our environmental impact and utilized sustainability to reduce this impact while achieving cost efficiencies in our operations by implementing a range of energy management practices. As a result, we have reduced our energy consumption every year since 2003. In this period, excluding new developments, we have reduced the energy usage over which we have direct control, by 540 million kWh, representing a 51% reduction across a portfolio of comparable properties. In recent years, we have ramped up these efforts, and from 2013-2020 have achieved an energy use reduction of 370 million kWh, representing a 41% reduction in a seven-year period, accounting for 69% of total reductions achieved since 2003.
Our reduction in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from our energy management efforts since 2003 is 384,962 metric tons of CO2e. This figure represents a reduction of 67% and includes emission streams scope 1 and scope 2. Enhanced efforts from 2013-2020 have resulted in emissions reduction of 199,886 metric tons of CO2e. This represents a 51% reduction in a seven-year period, accounting for 52% of total reductions achieved since 2003. Additional emission streams, such as scope 3 emissions generated from tenants’ plug-load consumption, are included in Simon’s annual sustainability report published in accordance with the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI).
We are also focused on reducing our water usage and have a goal of reducing consumption by 20% from levels established in 2013 before 2025. While in 2020 we achieved a reduction of 25% in water use, this was primarily due to governmental restrictions which caused the temporary closure of our properties. Therefore, Simon is not comparing FY2020 water consumption against its 2025 target, and we will release our water consumption against the 20% reduction goal in 2022.
In 2020, due to governmental restrictions, many centers were closed temporarily. For this reason, our environmental impact during 2020 shows a steep decrease compared to other years. Our energy consumption decreased in this period by 27% and our carbon emissions from our properties decreased by 26%. We used 25% less water in 2020 compared to 2019 and collected 42% less solid waste. Since our assets were not open for approximately 13,500 shopping days during 2020, these reductions do not represent actual environmental improvements alone, but a combination of these and the many actions our management teams took to reduce operational expenditures during the closures. For this reason, the reductions from 2019 to 2020 should not be viewed as continuing on an annual basis.
In 2020, Simon announced new 2035 emissions targets approved by the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi). Our commitment is to reduce scope 1 and scope 2 emissions by 68% (2019 baseline), and scope 3, including tenant emissions by 21% (2018 baseline). We are developing our “Roadmap to 2035” which will identify how we will plan to achieve our new science-based targets and that will detail all aspects of our business that will include a sustainability focus. Our complete “Low Carbon Transition Plan” will be published in the future. We also continue to align our climate-related risk disclosure with the recommendations made by the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), established by the Financial Stability Board (FSB).
Simon’s sustainability performance improved in 2021 and has been recognized by international organizations. In 2021, Simon again participated in CDP’s annual climate change questionnaire, and for the 2nd consecutive year received an A score, earning a prestigious place on CDP’s climate change ‘A List’ that represents results achieved by only 200 of the 13,000+ (1.5%) reporting organizations globally. In 2021 Simon was once again awarded a Green Star ranking (2014-
46
2021) - the highest designation awarded for leadership in sustainability performance by the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB). Simon was also awarded 28 new Institute of Real Estate Management (IREM®) Certified Sustainable Property Certifications (IREM CSP) across our portfolio and renewed our certifications at the Shops at Crystals. The IREM CSP is a prestigious sustainability certification program that focuses on the role of exceptional real estate management in green building performance. Finally, Simon was recognized for the first time as a “Best Places to Work for Disability Inclusion” by Disability: IN for our continued efforts in diversity and inclusion.
To learn more and access the latest report visit: investors.simon.com/sustainability. The information in such report is not incorporated herein by reference and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Mortgages and Unsecured Debt
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages encumbering our properties, and the properties held by our domestic and international joint venture arrangements, and also our unsecured corporate debt, excluding TRG. Substantially all of the mortgage and property related debt is nonrecourse to us.
47
Interest | Face | Annual Debt | Maturity |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property Name |
| Rate |
| Amount |
| Service (1) |
| Date |
| ||||||
Consolidated Indebtedness: | |||||||||||||||
Secured Indebtedness: | |||||||||||||||
Arizona Mills |
| 3.80 | % | $ | 99,682 | $ | 5,582 | 09/01/26 | |||||||
Birch Run Premium Outlets |
| 4.21 | % | 123,000 | 5,249 | (2) | 02/06/26 | ||||||||
Calhoun Outlet Marketplace |
| 4.17 | % | 17,552 | (19) | 1,139 | 06/01/26 | ||||||||
Domain, The |
| 3.09 | % | 210,000 | 6,497 | (2) | 07/01/31 | ||||||||
Ellenton Premium Outlets |
| 4.30 | % | 178,000 | 7,758 | (2) | 12/01/25 | ||||||||
Empire Mall |
| 4.31 | % | 180,452 | 11,289 | 12/01/25 | |||||||||
Florida Keys Outlet Marketplace |
| 4.17 | % | 17,000 | 718 | (2) | 12/01/25 | ||||||||
Gaffney Outlet Marketplace |
| 4.17 | % | 28,352 | (19) | 1,839 | 06/01/26 | ||||||||
Grove City Premium Outlets |
| 4.31 | % | 140,000 | 6,116 | (2) | 12/01/25 | ||||||||
Gulfport Premium Outlets |
| 4.35 | % | 50,000 | 2,204 | (2) | 12/01/25 | ||||||||
Gurnee Mills |
| 3.99 | % | 257,710 | 10,283 | (2) | 10/01/26 | ||||||||
Hagerstown Premium Outlets |
| 4.26 | % | 71,901 | 4,546 | 02/06/26 | |||||||||
La Reggia Designer Outlet Phases 1 2 |
| 2.53 | % | (25) | 148,397 | (30) | 13,014 | 02/15/22 | |||||||
Lee Premium Outlets |
| 4.17 | % | 48,604 | (19) | 2,975 | 06/01/26 | ||||||||
Noventa Di Piave Designer Outlet Phases 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| 1.90 | % | 314,876 | (30) | 6,648 | (2) | 07/25/25 | |||||||
Ochtrup Designer Outlet | 2.10 | % | 56,715 | (30) | 2,586 | (2) | 06/30/26 | ||||||||
Opry Mills |
| 4.09 | % | 375,000 | 15,558 | (2) | 07/01/26 | ||||||||
Outlets at Orange, The |
| 4.22 | % | 215,000 | 9,192 | (2) | 04/01/24 | ||||||||
Oxford Valley Mall |
| 4.77 | % | 32,783 | (8) | 3,429 | 03/06/21 | ||||||||
Parndorf Designer Outlet |
| 2.00 | % | 208,273 | (30) | 4,066 | (2) | 07/04/29 | |||||||
Penn Square Mall |
| 3.84 | % | 310,000 | 12,076 | (2) | 01/01/26 | ||||||||
Phipps Plaza Hotel |
| 1.85 | % | (1) | 25,000 | 470 | (2) | 10/25/26 | |||||||
Pismo Beach Premium Outlets |
| 3.33 | % | 32,975 | (20) | 1,953 | 09/06/26 | ||||||||
Plaza Carolina |
| 1.20 | % | (1) | 225,000 | 2,782 | (2) | 07/27/23 | |||||||
Pleasant Prairie Premium Outlets |
| 4.00 | % | 145,000 | 5,873 | (2) | 09/01/27 | ||||||||
Potomac Mills |
| 3.46 | % | 416,000 | 14,583 | (2) | 11/01/26 | ||||||||
Provence Designer Outlet |
| 1.60 | % | (28) | 92,899 | (30) | 1,775 | (2) | 07/27/22 | (3) | |||||
Puerto Rico Premium Outlets |
| 1.20 | % | (1) | 160,000 | 1,962 | (2) | 07/26/23 | |||||||
Queenstown Premium Outlets |
| 3.33 | % | 57,928 | (20) | 3,430 | 09/06/26 | ||||||||
Roermond Designer Outlet |
| 1.78 | % | 260,891 | (30) | 4,974 | (2) | 03/31/22 | |||||||
Roosendaal Designer Outlets |
| 1.75 | % | (24) | 65,105 | (30) | 6,689 | 02/25/24 | (3) | ||||||
Shops at Chestnut Hill, The |
| 4.69 | % | 120,000 | 5,703 | (2) | 11/01/23 | ||||||||
Southridge Mall |
| 3.85 | % | 112,087 | 4,342 | (2) | 06/06/23 | ||||||||
Summit Mall |
| 3.31 | % | 85,000 | 2,856 | (2) | 10/01/26 | ||||||||
Syosset Park | 2.60 | % | (1) | 48,854 | 1,271 | 05/12/26 | (3) | ||||||||
University Park Village |
| 3.85 | % | 53,408 | 3,091 | 05/01/28 | |||||||||
White Oaks Mall |
| 2.98 | % | (1) | 42,594 | 2,894 | 06/01/24 | (3) | |||||||
Williamsburg Premium Outlets |
| 4.23 | % | 185,000 | 7,932 | (2) | 02/06/26 | ||||||||
Wolfchase Galleria | 4.15 | % | 155,152 | 6,522 | (2) | 11/01/26 | |||||||||
Total Consolidated Secured Indebtedness | $ | 5,366,190 | |||||||||||||
48
Interest | Face | Annual Debt | Maturity |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property Name |
| Rate |
| Amount |
| Service (1) |
| Date |
| ||||||
Unsecured Indebtedness: | |||||||||||||||
Simon Property Group, L.P. |
| ||||||||||||||
Global Commercial Paper - USD |
| 0.22 | % | (16) | 500,000 |
| 1,104 | (2) | 01/23/22 | ||||||
Revolving Credit Facility - USD |
| 0.88 | % | (15) | 125,000 |
| 1,100 | (2) | 06/30/25 | (3) | |||||
Supplemental Credit Facility - USD | 0.88 | % | (15) | 1,050,000 | (35) | 9,240 | (2) | 01/31/27 | (3) | ||||||
Unsecured Notes - 22C |
| 6.75 | % | 600,000 |
| 40,500 | (14) | 02/01/40 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 25C |
| 4.75 | % | 550,000 |
| 26,125 | (14) | 03/15/42 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 27B |
| 3.75 | % | 600,000 |
| 22,500 | (14) | 02/01/24 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 28A |
| 3.38 | % | 900,000 | 30,375 | (14) | 10/01/24 | ||||||||
Unsecured Notes - 28B |
| 4.25 | % | 400,000 | 17,000 | (14) | 10/01/44 | ||||||||
Unsecured Notes - 29B |
| 3.50 | % | 1,100,000 |
| 38,500 | (14) | 09/01/25 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 30B |
| 3.30 | % | 800,000 |
| 26,400 | (14) | 01/15/26 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 31B |
| 3.25 | % | 750,000 |
| 24,375 | (14) | 11/30/26 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 31C |
| 4.25 | % | 550,000 |
| 23,375 | (14) | 11/30/46 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 32B |
| 3.38 | % | 750,000 |
| 25,313 | (14) | 06/15/27 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 33A |
| 2.75 | % | 600,000 |
| 16,500 | (14) | 06/01/23 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 33B |
| 3.38 | % | 750,000 |
| 25,313 | (14) | 12/01/27 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 34A |
| 2.00 | % | 1,000,000 |
| 20,000 | (14) | 09/13/24 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 34B |
| 2.45 | % | 1,250,000 |
| 30,625 | (14) | 09/13/29 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 34C |
| 3.25 | % | 1,250,000 |
| 40,625 | (14) | 09/13/49 | |||||||
Unsecured Notes - 35A | 2.65 | % | 750,000 | 19,875 | (14) | 07/15/30 | |||||||||
Unsecured Notes - 35B | 3.80 | % | 750,000 | 28,500 | (14) | 07/15/50 | |||||||||
Unsecured Notes - 36A | 1.75 | % | 800,000 | 14,000 | (14) | 02/01/28 | |||||||||
Unsecured Notes - 36B | 2.20 | % | 700,000 | 15,400 | (14) | 02/01/31 | |||||||||
Unsecured Notes - 37A | 1.38 | % | 550,000 | 7,563 | (14) | 01/15/27 | |||||||||
Unsecured Notes - 37B | 2.25 | % | 700,000 | 15,750 | (14) | 01/15/32 | |||||||||
Unsecured Notes - Euro 2 |
| 1.38 | % | 850,731 | (13) |
| 11,698 | (6) | 11/18/22 | ||||||
Unsecured Notes - Euro 3 | 1.25 | % | 567,156 | (10) | 7,089 | (6) | 05/13/25 | ||||||||
Unsecured Notes - Euro 4 | 1.13 | % | 850,731 | (13) | 9,571 | (6) | 03/19/33 | ||||||||
Total Consolidated Unsecured Indebtedness | $ | 20,043,618 | |||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Indebtedness at Face Amounts | $ | 25,409,808 | |||||||||||||
Premium on Indebtedness |
| 28,055 | |||||||||||||
Discount on Indebtedness |
| (56,127) | |||||||||||||
Debt Issuance Costs |
| (124,159) | |||||||||||||
Other Debt Obligations |
| 63,445 | (18) | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Indebtedness | $ | 25,321,022 | |||||||||||||
Our Share of Consolidated Indebtedness | $ | 25,148,756 | |||||||||||||
49
Interest | Face | Annual Debt | Maturity |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property Name |
| Rate |
| Amount |
| Service (1) |
| Date |
| ||||||
Joint Venture Indebtedness: | |||||||||||||||
Secured Indebtedness: |
| ||||||||||||||
Ami Premium Outlets |
| 2.22 | % | $ | 14,889 | (26) | $ | 13,252 | 09/25/23 | ||||||
Arundel Mills |
| 4.29 | % |
| 383,500 |
| 16,673 | (2) | 02/06/24 | ||||||
Ashford Designer Outlet |
| 3.08 | % |
| 135,121 | (21) |
| 4,062 | (2) | 02/22/22 | |||||
Aventura Mall |
| 4.12 | % |
| 1,750,000 |
| 73,124 | (2) | 07/01/28 | ||||||
Avenues, The |
| 3.60 | % |
| 110,000 |
| 4,015 | (2) | 02/06/23 | ||||||
Briarwood Mall |
| 3.29 | % |
| 165,000 |
| 5,507 | (2) | 09/01/26 | ||||||
Busan Premium Outlets |
| 3.04 | % |
| 91,624 | (17) |
| 2,574 | (2) | 06/20/23 | |||||
Cape Cod Mall |
| 2.35 | % | (1) |
| 52,000 |
| 1,223 | (2) | 07/30/26 | (3) | ||||
Charlotte Premium Outlets |
| 4.27 | % |
| 100,000 |
| 4,278 | (2) | 07/01/28 | ||||||
Clarksburg Premium Outlets |
| 3.95 | % |
| 160,000 |
| 6,362 | (2) | 01/01/28 | ||||||
Coconut Point |
| 3.95 | % |
| 179,212 |
| 10,811 | 10/01/26 | |||||||
Colorado Mills - 1 |
| 4.28 | % |
| 126,401 |
| 8,050 | 11/01/24 | |||||||
Colorado Mills - 2 |
| 2.80 | % |
| 30,000 |
| 1,099 | (2) | 07/01/31 | ||||||
Concord Mills |
| 3.84 | % |
| 235,000 |
| 9,140 | (2) | 11/01/22 | ||||||
Crystal Mall |
| 4.46 | % |
| 83,086 |
| 4,742 | 06/06/22 | |||||||
Dadeland Mall |
| 4.50 | % |
| 385,000 |
| 27,439 | 01/05/27 | |||||||
Dadeland Mall Hotel | 2.45 | % | (1) | 27,134 | 665 | (2) | 07/01/24 | (3) | |||||||
Del Amo Fashion Center |
| 3.66 | % |
| 585,000 |
| 21,694 | (2) | 06/01/27 | ||||||
Domain Westin |
| 4.12 | % |
| 61,876 |
| 4,406 | 09/01/25 | |||||||
Dover Mall |
| 5.57 | % |
| 80,506 |
| 4,485 | (2) | 08/06/26 | ||||||
Emerald Square Mall |
| 4.71 | % |
| 99,568 |
| 4,615 | (2) | 08/11/22 | ||||||
Falls, The |
| 3.45 | % |
| 150,000 |
| 5,247 | (2) | 09/01/26 | ||||||
Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The |
| 3.04 | % | (1) |
| 455,000 |
| 13,834 | (2) | 05/09/26 | (3) | ||||
Fashion Valley |
| 3.75 | % | (34) |
| 415,000 |
| 15,563 | (2) | 02/01/26 | (3) | ||||
Florida Mall, The |
| 5.25 | % |
| 296,071 |
| 25,172 | 03/05/22 | |||||||
Galleria, The |
| 3.55 | % |
| 1,200,000 |
| 43,189 | (2) | 03/01/25 | ||||||
Genting Highland Premium Outlets |
| 3.97 | % | (7) |
| 19,051 | (9) |
| 870 | (2) | 02/14/24 | ||||
Gloucester Premium Outlets | 1.60 | % | (1) | 86,000 | 1,399 | (2) | 03/01/23 | (3) | |||||||
Gotemba Premium Outlets |
| 0.16 | % |
| 112,952 | (26) |
| 270 | (2) | 04/08/27 | |||||
Grapevine Mills |
| 3.83 | % | 268,000 | 10,414 | (2) | 10/01/24 | ||||||||
Hamilton Town Center |
| 4.81 | % | 74,613 | 5,286 | 04/01/22 | |||||||||
Katy Mills |
| 3.49 | % | 140,000 | 4,954 | (2) | 12/06/22 | ||||||||
Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets |
| 0.34 | % | (12) |
| 7,821 | (26) |
| 28 | (2) | 01/31/23 | ||||
Lehigh Valley Mall |
| 4.06 | % |
| 185,317 |
| 11,522 | 11/01/27 | |||||||
Liberty Tree Mall |
| 3.41 | % |
| 28,486 |
| 1,964 | 05/06/23 | |||||||
Malaga Designer Outlet |
| 2.75 | % | (22) |
| 67,246 |
| 2,166 | (2) | 02/09/23 | |||||
Mall at Rockingham Park, The |
| 4.04 | % |
| 262,000 |
| 10,732 | (2) | 06/01/26 | ||||||
Mall at Tuttle Crossing, The |
| 3.56 | % |
| 114,814 |
| 4,056 | (2) | 05/01/23 | ||||||
Mall of New Hampshire, The |
| 4.11 | % |
| 150,000 |
| 6,248 | (2) | 07/01/25 | ||||||
Meadowood Mall |
| 5.70 | % |
| 107,841 |
| 8,592 | 12/01/26 | |||||||
Miami International Mall |
| 4.42 | % |
| 160,000 |
| 7,170 | (2) | 02/06/24 | ||||||
Northshore Mall |
| 3.30 | % |
| 222,911 |
| 14,717 | 07/05/23 | |||||||
50
Interest | Face | Annual Debt | Maturity |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property Name |
| Rate |
| Amount |
| Service (1) |
| Date |
| ||||||
Ontario Mills |
| 4.25 | % |
| 280,247 |
| 20,976 | 03/05/22 | |||||||
Paju Premium Outlets |
| 2.95 | % |
| 59,680 | (17) |
| 4,340 | (2) | 07/13/24 | |||||
Premium Outlet Collection Edmonton IA |
| 1.73 | % | (4) |
| 107,476 | (5) |
| 1,870 | (2) | 11/30/23 | ||||
Premium Outlets Montréal |
| 3.08 | % |
| 94,498 | (5) |
| 2,703 | (2) | 06/01/24 | |||||
Quaker Bridge Mall |
| 4.50 | % |
| 180,000 |
| 8,100 | (2) | 05/01/26 | ||||||
Querétaro Premium Outlets - Fixed |
| 9.98 | % |
| 21,227 | (32) |
| 2,119 | 12/20/33 | ||||||
Querétaro Premium Outlets - Variable | 8.49 | % | 4,070 | (32) | 346 | (2) | 06/30/23 | ||||||||
Rinku Premium Outlets - Fixed |
| 0.30 | % |
| 51,263 | (26) |
| 155 | (2) | 07/31/27 | |||||
Rinku Premium Outlets - Variable | 0.34 | % | (12) | 8,687 | (26) | 29 | (2) | 07/31/22 | |||||||
Roermond 4 Designer Outlet |
| 1.30 | % | (23) |
| 190,563 | (30) |
| 2,477 | (2) | 08/18/25 | ||||
Roosevelt Field Hotel |
| 3.20 | % | (1) |
| 29,150 |
| 772 | (2) | 07/31/23 | (3) | ||||
Sano Premium Outlets |
| 0.28 | % |
| 39,533 | (26) |
| 129 | (2) | 02/28/25 | |||||
Sawgrass Mills Hotel |
| 5.27 | % | (33) |
| 28,501 |
| 1,502 | (1) | 06/07/24 | (3) | ||||
Shisui Premium Outlets Phase 1 |
| 0.32 | % | (12) |
| 24,329 | (26) |
| 258 | (2) | 05/31/23 | ||||
Shisui Premium Outlets Phase 2 |
| 0.35 | % |
| 43,443 | (26) |
| 150 | (2) | 04/08/25 | |||||
Shisui Premium Outlets Phase 3 |
| 0.32 | % | (12) |
| 22,591 | (26) |
| 72 | (2) | 11/30/23 | ||||
Shops at Clearfork, The |
| 2.81 | % | (27) |
| 145,000 |
| 4,072 | (2) | 03/11/30 | |||||
Shops at Crystals, The |
| 3.74 | % |
| 550,000 |
| 20,878 | (2) | 07/01/26 | ||||||
Shops at Mission Viejo, The |
| 3.61 | % |
| 295,000 |
| 10,797 | (2) | 02/01/23 | ||||||
Siam Premium Outlets Bangkok |
| 3.95 | % |
| 73,305 | (11) |
| 2,152 | (2) | 06/05/31 | |||||
Siheung Premium Outlets |
| 2.51 | % |
| 126,086 | (17) |
| 3,625 | (2) | 03/15/24 | |||||
Silver Sands Premium Outlets |
| 3.93 | % |
| 100,000 |
| 2,940 | (2) | 06/01/22 | ||||||
Smith Haven Mall |
| 3.10 | % | (1) |
| 171,750 |
| 5,392 | (2) | 03/31/24 | (3) | ||||
Solomon Pond Mall |
| 4.01 | % |
| 91,178 |
| 5,833 | 11/01/22 | |||||||
Southdale Hotel |
| 2.10 | % | (1) |
| 17,000 |
| 431 | (2) | 06/01/22 | |||||
Southdale Residential |
| 4.46 | % |
| 37,160 |
| 2,525 | 10/15/35 | |||||||
Springfield Mall |
| 4.45 | % |
| 57,949 |
| 4,171 | 10/06/25 | |||||||
Square One Mall |
| 5.47 | % |
| 84,177 |
| 4,701 | (2) | 01/06/27 | ||||||
St. Johns Town Center |
| 3.82 | % |
| 350,000 |
| 13,552 | (2) | 09/11/24 | ||||||
St. Louis Premium Outlets |
| 4.06 | % |
| 91,459 |
| 5,478 | 10/06/24 | |||||||
Stoneridge Shopping Center |
| 3.50 | % |
| 330,000 |
| 11,550 | (2) | 09/05/26 | ||||||
Tanger Outlets Columbus |
| 1.95 | % | (1) |
| 71,000 |
| 1,502 | (2) | 11/28/22 | (3) | ||||
Tanger Outlets - Galveston/Houston |
| 1.95 | % | (1) |
| 64,500 |
| 1,385 | (2) | 07/01/23 | (3) | ||||
Toki Premium Outlets - Fixed |
| 0.21 | % |
| 23,025 | (26) |
| 52 | (2) | 11/30/24 | |||||
Toki Premium Outlets - Variable |
| 0.29 | % | (12) |
| 3,041 | (26) |
| 3,041 | (2) | 11/30/24 | ||||
Toronto Premium Outlets |
| 3.11 | % |
| 133,871 | (5) |
| 4,158 | (2) | 06/01/22 | |||||
Toronto Premium Outlets II |
| 1.63 | % | (4) |
| 92,729 | (5) |
| 1,509 | (2) | 05/24/22 | ||||
Tosu Premium Outlets |
| 0.20 | % | (12) |
| 53,870 | (26) |
| 169 | (2) | 10/31/26 | ||||
Twin Cities Premium Outlets |
| 4.32 | % |
| 115,000 |
| 5,037 | (2) | 11/06/24 | ||||||
Vancouver Designer Outlet | 1.98 | % | (4) |
| 127,104 | (5) |
| 2,388 | (2) | 02/18/23 | (3) | ||||
West Midlands Designer Outlets | 3.91 | % | 81,632 | (16) | 3,193 | (1) | 02/27/23 | ||||||||
West Town Mall | 4.37 | % |
| 203,199 |
| 12,844 | 07/01/22 | ||||||||
Westchester, The | 3.25 | % |
| 400,000 |
| 13,181 | (2) | 02/01/30 | |||||||
Woodfield Mall | 4.50 | % |
| 389,507 | 26,137 | 03/05/24 | |||||||||
51
Interest | Face | Annual Debt | Maturity |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property Name |
| Rate |
| Amount |
| Service (1) |
| Date |
| ||||||
Yeoju Premium Outlets | 2.95 | % |
| 56,316 | (17) | 1,953 | (2) | 09/28/24 | |||||||
Total Joint Venture Secured Indebtedness at Face Value |
| 14,898,156 |
| ||||||||||||
TMLP Indebtedness at Face Value |
| 363,137 | (29) | ||||||||||||
Total Joint Venture and TMLP Indebtedness at Face Value |
| 15,261,293 |
| ||||||||||||
Debt Issuance Costs |
| (37,583) | |||||||||||||
Total Joint Venture Indebtedness | $ | 15,223,710 |
| ||||||||||||
Our Share of Joint Venture Indebtedness | $ | 6,994,873 | (31) | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Variable rate loans based on one-month (1M) LIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 110 bps to 324 bps. 1M LIBOR as of December 31, 2021 was 0.10%. |
| (2) | Requires monthly payment of interest only. |
| (3) | Includes applicable extension available at the Applicable Borrower's option. |
| (4) | Variable rate loans based on 1M CDOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 120 bps to 155 bps. 1M CDOR at December 31, 2021 was 0.45%. |
| (5) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. CAD equivalent is 705.6 million. |
| (6) | Requires annual payment of interest only. |
| (7) | Variable rate loans based on Cost of Fund plus interest rate spreads of 175 bps. Cost of Fund as of December 31, 2021 was 2.22%. |
| (8) | Mortgage is outstanding as of 12/31/2021, the single purpose entity borrower and the lender are currently working together to extend the maturity date of this non-recourse loan. |
| (9) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Ringgit equivalent is 79.4 million. |
| (10) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 500.0 million. |
| (11) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Baht equivalent is 2.4 billion. |
| (12) | Variable rate loans based on six-month (6M) TIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 15 bps to 35 bps. As of December 31, 2021, 6M TIBOR was 0.14%. |
| (13) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 750.0 million. |
| (14) | Requires semi-annual payments of interest only. |
| (15) | Credit Facilities. As of December 31, 2021, the Credit Facilities bear interest at a SOFR index subject to a 10bps adjustment plus 72.5 bps credit spread. The Credit Facilities provide for different pricing based upon our investment grade rating. As of December 31, 2021, $5.8 billion was available after outstanding borrowings and letters of credit under our Credit Facilities. |
| (16) | Reflects the weighted average maturity date and weighted average interest rate of all outstanding tranches of commercial paper at December 31, 2021. |
| (17) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Won equivalent is 397.0 billion. |
| (18) | City of Sunrise Bond Liability (Sawgrass Mills). |
| (19) | Loans secured by these three properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted. |
| (20) | Loans secured by these two properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted. |
| (21) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. GBP equivalent is 100.0 million. |
| (22) | Variable rate loan based on three-month (3M) EURIBOR, which is subject to a floor of 0.00%, plus an interest rate spread of 275 bps. |
52
| (23) | Variable rate loan based on 3M EURIBOR plus an interest rate spread of 130 bps. Through an interest rate floor agreement, 3M EURIBOR is currently fixed at 0.00%. Also, 3M EURIBOR is capped at 1.30%. |
| (24) | Variable rate loan based on 3M EURIBOR, which is subject to a floor of 0.00%, plus an interest rate spread of 175 bps. |
| (25) | Variable rate loan based on 3M EURIBOR plus an interest rate spread from 250 bps to 275 bps. Through an interest rate floor agreement, 3M EURIBOR is currently fixed at 0.00%. |
| (26) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Yen equivalent is 46.7 billion |
| (27) | Associated with this loan is an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixes the interest rate on this loan at the all-in rate presented. |
| (28) | Variable rate loan based on 3M EURIBOR plus an interest rate spread of 160 bps. Through an interest rate floor agreement, 3M EURIBOR is currently fixed at 0.00%. In addition, 3M EURIBOR is capped at 1.00%. |
| (29) | Consists of two properties with interest rates ranging from 5.65% to 7.32% and maturities in 2024. |
| (30) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 1.2 billion. |
| (31) | Our share of total indebtedness includes a pro rata share of the mortgage debt on joint venture properties, including properties owned by The Mills Limited Partnership. To the extent total indebtedness is secured by a property, it is non-recourse to us, with the exception of approximately $209.9 million of payment guarantees provided by the Operating Partnership. |
| (32) | Amount shown in USD equivalent. Peso equivalent is 517.6 million. |
| (33) | Variable rate loan based on 1M LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of 295 bps. In addition, LIBOR floor at 2.32%. |
| (34) | Variable rate loan based on 1M LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of 350 bps. In addition, LIBOR floor at 0.25%. |
| (35) | On January 12, 2022, the Operating Partnership repaid $1.05 billion under the Supplemental Credit Facility. |
The changes in consolidated mortgages and unsecured indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
Balance, Beginning of Year | $ | 26,723,361 | $ | 24,163,230 | $ | 23,305,535 | ||||
Additions during period: | ||||||||||
New Loan Originations |
| 9,255,220 |
| 15,269,455 |
| 13,355,809 | ||||
Loans assumed in acquisitions and consolidation |
| 46,263 |
| — |
| 21,001 | ||||
Net (Discount)/Premium |
| (9,118) |
| 28,906 |
| (16,903) | ||||
Net Debt Issuance Costs | (35,818) | (34,595) | (23,505) | |||||||
Deductions during period: | ||||||||||
Loan Retirements |
| (10,386,133) |
| (12,932,448) |
| (12,366,951) | ||||
Amortization of Net Discounts/(Premiums) |
| 168 |
| 174 |
| (758) | ||||
Debt Issuance Cost Amortization | 24,794 | 23,076 | 18,400 | |||||||
Scheduled Principal Amortization |
| (48,386) |
| (51,728) |
| (58,419) | ||||
Foreign Currency Translation | (249,329) | 257,291 | (70,979) | |||||||
Balance, Close of Year | $ | 25,321,022 | $ | 26,723,361 | $ | 24,163,230 | ||||
53
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are involved from time-to-time in various legal and regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to, commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions such as acquisitions and divestitures. We believe that current proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
54
Part II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Simon
Market Information
Simon’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SPG”.
Holders
The number of holders of record of common stock outstanding was 1,102 as of January 31, 2022. The Class B common stock is subject to two voting trusts as to which Herbert Simon and David Simon are the trustees. Shares of Class B common stock convert automatically into an equal number of shares of common stock upon the occurrence of certain events and can be converted into shares of common stock at the option of the holders.
Dividends
We must pay a minimum amount of dividends to maintain Simon’s status as a REIT. Simon’s future dividends and future distributions of the Operating Partnership will be determined by Simon’s Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, based on actual and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, cash available for dividends and limited partner distributions, cash reserves as deemed necessary for capital and operating expenditures, financing covenants, if any, and the amount required to maintain Simon’s status as a REIT.
Common stock cash dividends paid during 2021 aggregated $7.15 per share. Common stock cash dividends during 2020 aggregated $4.70 per share. On February 7, 2022, Simon’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend for the first quarter of 2022 of $1.65 per share, payable on March 31, 2022 to shareholders of record on March 10, 2022.
We offer a dividend reinvestment plan that allows Simon’s stockholders to acquire additional shares by automatically reinvesting cash dividends. Shares are acquired pursuant to the plan at a price equal to the prevailing market price of such shares, without payment of any brokerage commission or service charge.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities made by Simon during the quarter ended December 31, 2021.
Issuances Under Equity Compensation Plans
For information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There were no unregistered purchases of equity securities made by Simon during the quarter ended December 31, 2021.
The Operating Partnership
Market Information
There is no established trading market for units or preferred units.
Holders
The number of holders of record of units was 228 as of January 31, 2022.
Distributions
The Operating Partnership makes distributions on its units in amounts sufficient to maintain Simon's qualification as a REIT. Simon is required each year to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income after certain
55
adjustments. Future distributions will be determined by Simon’s Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, based on actual and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, cash available for distributions, cash reserves as deemed necessary for capital and operating expenditures, financing covenants, if any, and the distributions that may be required to maintain Simon's status as a REIT.
Distributions during 2021 aggregated $7.15 per unit. Distributions during 2020 aggregated $4.70 per unit. On February 7, 2022, Simon’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash distribution for the first quarter of 2022 of $1.65 per unit, payable on March 31, 2022 to unitholders of record on March 10, 2022. The distribution rate on the Operating Partnership’s units is equal to the dividend rate on Simon’s common stock.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities made by the Operating Partnership during the quarter ended December 31, 2021.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the quarter ended December 31, 2021, the Operating Partnership redeemed 15,219 units from five limited partners for $2.2 million in cash.
Item 6. Reserved
56
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Simon Property Group, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. REITs will generally not be liable for U.S. federal corporate income taxes as long as they distribute not less than 100% of their REIT taxable income. Simon Property Group, L.P. is our majority-owned Delaware partnership subsidiary that owns all of our real estate properties and other assets. In this discussion, unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to Simon mean Simon Property Group, Inc. and references to the Operating Partnership mean Simon Property Group, L.P. References to we, us and our mean collectively Simon, the Operating Partnership and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by Simon and/or the Operating Partnership. According to the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement, the Operating Partnership is required to pay all expenses of Simon.
We own, develop and manage premier shopping, dining, entertainment and mixed-use destinations, which consist primarily of malls, Premium Outlets®, and The Mills®. As of December 31, 2021, we owned or held an interest in 199 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 95 malls, 69 Premium Outlets, 14 Mills, six lifestyle centers, and 15 other retail properties in 37 states and Puerto Rico. We also own an 80% noncontrolling interest in The Taubman Realty Group, LLC, or TRG, which has an interest in 24 regional, super-regional, and outlet malls in the U.S. and Asia. In addition, we have redevelopment and expansion projects, including the addition of anchors, big box tenants, and restaurants, underway at several properties in the North America, Europe and Asia. Internationally, as of December 31, 2021, we had ownership in 33 Premium Outlets and Designer Outlet properties primarily located in Asia, Europe, and Canada. We also have two international outlet properties under development. As of December 31, 2021, we also owned a 22.4% equity stake in Klépierre SA, or Klépierre, a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in, shopping centers located in 14 countries in Europe.
We generate the majority of our lease income from retail, dining, entertainment, and other tenants including consideration received from:
| ● | fixed minimum lease consideration and fixed common area maintenance (CAM) reimbursements, and |
| ● | variable lease consideration primarily based on tenants’ sales, as well as reimbursements for real estate taxes, utilities, marketing and certain other items. |
Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.
We invest in real estate properties to maximize total financial return which includes both operating cash flows and capital appreciation. We seek growth in earnings, funds from operations, or FFO, and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our properties and investments. We seek to accomplish this growth through the following:
| ● | attracting and retaining high quality tenants and utilizing economies of scale to reduce operating expenses, |
| ● | expanding and re-tenanting existing highly productive locations at competitive rental rates, |
| ● | selectively acquiring or increasing our interests in high quality real estate assets or portfolios of assets, |
| ● | generating consumer traffic in our retail properties through marketing initiatives and strategic corporate alliances, and |
| ● | selling selective non-core assets. |
We also grow by generating supplemental revenues from the following activities:
| ● | establishing our malls as leading market resource providers for retailers and other businesses and consumer-focused corporate alliances, including payment systems (such as handling fees relating to the sales of bank-issued prepaid cards), national marketing alliances, static and digital media initiatives, business development, sponsorship, and events, |
57
| ● | offering property operating services to our tenants and others, including waste handling and facility services, and the provision of energy services, |
| ● | selling or leasing land adjacent to our properties, commonly referred to as “outlots” or “outparcels,” and |
| ● | generating interest income on cash deposits and investments in loans, including those made to related entities. |
We focus on high quality real estate across the retail real estate spectrum. We expand or redevelop properties to enhance profitability and market share of existing assets when we believe the investment of our capital meets our risk-reward criteria. We selectively develop new properties in markets we believe are not adequately served by existing retail outlet properties.
We routinely review and evaluate acquisition opportunities based on their ability to enhance our portfolio. Our international strategy includes partnering with established real estate companies and financing international investments with local currency to minimize foreign exchange risk.
To support our growth, we employ a three-fold capital strategy:
| ● | provide the capital necessary to fund growth, |
| ● | maintain sufficient flexibility to access capital in many forms, both public and private, and |
| ● | manage our overall financial structure in a fashion that preserves our investment grade credit ratings. |
We consider FFO, net operating income, or NOI, and portfolio NOI to be key measures of operating performance that are not specifically defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. We use these measures internally to evaluate the operating performance of our portfolio and provide a basis for comparison with other real estate companies. Reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measure are included below in this discussion.
COVID-19
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel strain of coronavirus, or COVID-19, a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a material negative impact on economic and market conditions around the world, and, notwithstanding the fact that vaccines are being administered in the United States and elsewhere, the pandemic continues to adversely impact economic activity in retail real estate. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and governments and other authorities, including where we own or hold interests in properties, have imposed at times measures intended to control its spread, including restrictions on freedom of movement, group gatherings and business operations such as travel bans, border closings, business closures, quarantines, stay-at-home, shelter-in-place orders, capacity limitations and social distancing measures. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and these periodic measures, the Company has experienced material impacts including changes in the ability to recognize revenue due to changes in our assessment of the probability of collection of lease income and asset impairment charges as a result of changing cash flows generated by our properties and investments. Due to certain restrictive governmental orders placed on us, our domestic portfolio lost approximately 13,500 shopping days in 2020, the majority of which occurred in the second quarter.
As we developed and implemented our response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions intended to prevent its spread on our business, our primary focus has been on the health and safety of our employees, our shoppers and the communities in which we serve. In the second quarter of 2020, in connection with the property closures, we implemented a series of actions to reduce costs and increase liquidity in light of the economic impacts of the pandemic, including:
| ● | significantly reduced all non-essential corporate spending, |
| ● | significantly reduced property operating expenses, including discretionary marketing spend, |
| ● | implemented a temporary furlough of certain corporate and field employees due to the closure of the Company’s U.S. properties as a result of restrictive governmental orders; reduced certain corporate and field personnel and implemented a temporary freeze on company hiring efforts, and |
| ● | suspended more than $1.0 billion of redevelopment and new development projects. |
58
Results Overview
Diluted earnings per share and diluted earnings per unit increased $3.25 during 2021 to $6.84 as compared to $3.59 in 2020. The increase in diluted earnings per share and diluted earnings per unit was primarily attributable to:
| ● | improved operating performance and solid core business fundamentals in 2021 and the impact of our acquisition, development and expansion activity, |
| ● | increased income from unconsolidated entities of $563.0 million, or $1.50 per diluted share/unit, primarily due to favorable results of operations from our other platform investments, including earnings from our acquisition of an interest in J.C. Penney in the later part of 2020, and international investments which included the reversal of a previously established deferred tax liability at Klépierre resulting in a non-cash gain, of which our share was $118.4 million, partially offset by amortization of our excess investment in TRG, |
| ● | increased other income of $65.3 million, or $0.17 per diluted share/unit, primarily due to an increase in lease settlement income of $39.8 million, or $0.11 per diluted share/unit, |
| ● | a non-cash gain in 2021 on acquisitions and disposals of $203.4 million, or $0.54 per diluted share/unit, related to the disposition of our interest in three properties of $176.8 million, or $0.47 per diluted share/unit, a non-cash gain on the consolidation of one property of $3.7 million, or $0.01 per diluted share/unit, and net gains of $21.0 million, or $0.06 per diluted share/unit, related to property insurance recoveries of previously depreciated assets, primarily due to hurricane, flood and wind storm damage, |
| ● | a net loss in 2020 of $115.0 million, or $0.32 per diluted share/unit, primarily related to impairment charges related to Klépierre, an unconsolidated investment, one consolidated property, and three joint venture properties, partially offset by gains from disposition activity, of $14.9 million, or $0.04 per diluted share/unit, |
| ● | a non-cash gain in 2021 on the exchange of equity interests of $159.8 million, or $0.43 per diluted share/unit, |
| ● | a gain in 2021 on the sale of equity interests of $18.8 million, or $0.05 per diluted share/unit, and |
| ● | an unrealized favorable change in fair value of equity instruments of $11.5 million, or $0.03 per diluted share/unit, partially offset by |
| ● | increased tax expense of $161.8 million, or $0.43 per diluted share/unit, primarily due to favorable year-over-year operations from other platform investments and a $55.9 million tax impact created by the gain on sale or exchange of equity interests transactions noted above, |
| ● | increased interest expense in 2021 of $11.3 million, or $0.03 per diluted share/unit, due to Term Loan borrowings, which were subsequently replaced by notes issuances to fund our investment in TRG, and |
| ● | a charge on early extinguishment of debt of $51.8 million, or $0.14 per diluted share/unit, in 2021. |
Portfolio NOI increased 22.3% in 2021 as compared to 2020. Average base minimum rent for U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets decreased 3.4% to $53.91 psf as of December 31, 2021, from $55.80 psf as of December 31, 2020. Ending occupancy for our U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets increased 2.1% to 93.4% as of December 31, 2021, from 91.3% as of December 31, 2020, primarily due to leasing activity, partially offset by 2020 tenant bankruptcy activity.
Our effective overall borrowing rate at December 31, 2021 on our consolidated indebtedness decreased 12 basis points to 2.86% as compared to 2.98% at December 31, 2020. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the effective overall borrowing rate on variable rate debt of 11 basis points (1.20% at December 31, 2021 as compared to 1.31% at December 31, 2020) and a decrease in the effective overall borrowing rate on fixed rate debt of 22 basis points (3.28% at December 31, 2021 as compared to 3.50% at December 31, 2020). The weighted average years to maturity of our consolidated indebtedness was 7.8 years and 7.3 years at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Our financing activity for the year ended December 31, 2021 included:
| ● | borrowing $1.05 billion under the Operating Partnership’s $3.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, or Supplemental Facility, and using a portion of the proceeds to remove the encumbrances with respect to approximately $1.16 billion aggregate principal amount of mortgage loans, |
| ● | decreasing our borrowings under the Operating Partnership’s global unsecured commercial paper note program, or the Commercial Paper program, by $123.0 million, |
59
| ● | completing, on January 21, 2021, the issuance by the Operating Partnership of the following senior unsecured notes: $800 million with a fixed interest rate of 1.75%, $700 million with a fixed interest rate of 2.20%, with maturity dates of February 2028 and 2031, respectively. Proceeds from the unsecured notes offering funded the optional redemption at par of the Operating Partnership’s $550 million 2.50% notes due July 15, 2021, including the make-whole amount on January 27, 2021 and repaid $750.0 million of the indebtedness under the Operating Partnership’s $2.0 billion delayed-draw term loan facility, or Term Facility, which was a feature of, and in addition to, the Operating Partnership’s $4.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, or Credit Facility, and together with the Supplemental Facility, the Credit Facilities, as discussed below, |
| ● | completing, on March 19, 2021, the issuance of €750 million ($893.0 million U.S. dollar equivalent as of the issuance date) of senior unsecured notes at a fixed rate of 1.125% with a maturity date of March 19, 2033. Proceeds from the unsecured notes offering funded the repayment of the remaining indebtedness under the Term Facility, as discussed below, |
| ● | repaying, on March 23, 2021, the remaining $1.25 billion outstanding under the Term Facility, reducing the Term Facility balance to zero, and |
| ● | completing, on August 18, 2021, the issuance by the Operating Partnership of the following senior unsecured notes: $550 million with a fixed interest rate of 1.375% and $700 million with a fixed interest rate of 2.250%, with maturity dates of January 2027 and 2032, respectively. Proceeds from the unsecured notes offering, along with cash on hand, funded the optional redemption, including make-whole amounts, of the following senior unsecured notes: Operating Partnership’s $550 million 2.350% notes due January 30, 2022 and $600 million 2.625% notes due June 15, 2022, in each case on August 25, 2021, and $500 million 2.750% notes due February 1, 2023, on September 9, 2021. |
Subsequently on January 11, 2022, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $500 million with a floating interest rate of SOFR plus 43 basis points and $700 million with a fixed interest rate of 2.650%, with maturity dates of January 2024 and February 2032, respectively. The Operating Partnership used the net proceeds of the offering to repay $1.05 billion outstanding under the Supplemental Facility and for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of other indebtedness.
United States Portfolio Data
The portfolio data discussed in this overview includes the following key operating statistics: ending occupancy, and average base minimum rent per square foot. We include acquired properties in this data beginning in the year of acquisition and remove disposed properties in the year of disposition. For comparative information purposes, we separate the information related to The Mills from our other U.S. operations. We also do not include any information for properties located outside the United States or properties included in TRG.
60
The following table sets forth these key operating statistics for the combined U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets:
| ● | properties that are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements, |
| ● | properties we account for under the equity method of accounting as joint ventures, and |
| ● | the foregoing two categories of properties on a total portfolio basis. |
%/Basis Point | %/Basis Point |
| ||||||||||||
| 2021 | Change (1) | 2020 | Change (1) | 2019 |
| ||||||||
U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets: | ||||||||||||||
Ending Occupancy | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated | 93.5 | % | 200 | bps | 91.5 | % | -380 | bps | 95.3 | % | ||||
Unconsolidated | 93.1 | % | 220 | bps | 90.9 | % | -360 | bps | 94.5 | % | ||||
Total Portfolio | 93.4 | % | 210 | bps | 91.3 | % | -380 | bps | 95.1 | % | ||||
Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 52.59 | (2.6) | % | $ | 53.98 | 1.7 | % | $ | 53.06 | ||||
Unconsolidated | $ | 57.55 | (5.6) | % | $ | 60.97 | 3.8 | % | $ | 58.71 | ||||
Total Portfolio | $ | 53.91 | (3.4) | % | $ | 55.80 | 2.2 | % | $ | 54.59 | ||||
The Mills: | ||||||||||||||
Ending Occupancy |
| 97.6 | % | 230 | bps |
| 95.3 | % | -170 | bps |
| 97.0 | % | |
Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot | $ | 33.80 | 0.1 | % | $ | 33.77 | 2.1 | % | $ | 33.09 | ||||
| (1) | Percentages may not recalculate due to rounding. Percentage and basis point changes are representative of the change from the comparable prior period. |
Ending Occupancy Levels and Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot. Ending occupancy is the percentage of gross leasable area, or GLA, which is leased as of the last day of the reporting period. We include all company owned space except for mall anchors, mall majors, mall freestanding and mall outlots in the calculation. Base minimum rent per square foot is the average base minimum rent charge in effect for the reporting period for all tenants that would qualify to be included in ending occupancy.
Total Reported Sales per Square Foot. Given all of our U.S. retail properties were closed for a portion of the prior year due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are not presenting reported retail tenant sales per square foot as we do not believe the trends for the period are indicative of future operating trends.
Current Leasing Activities
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, we signed 992 new leases and 1,460 renewal leases (excluding mall anchors and majors, new development, redevelopment and leases with terms of one year or less) with a fixed minimum rent across our U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets portfolio, comprising approximately 8.3 million square feet, of which 6.5 million square feet related to consolidated properties. During 2020, we signed 460 new leases and 1,175 renewal leases with a fixed minimum rent, comprising approximately 6.1 million square feet, of which 4.8 million square feet related to consolidated properties. The average annual initial base minimum rent for new leases was $55.90 per square foot in 2021 and $53.97 per square foot in 2020 with an average tenant allowance on new leases of $53.75 per square foot and $51.01 per square foot, respectively.
61
Japan Data
The following are selected key operating statistics for our Premium Outlets in Japan. The information used to prepare these statistics has been supplied by the managing venture partner.
December 31, |
| %/basis point |
| December 31, |
| %/basis point |
| December 31, |
| ||||
2021 | Change | 2020 | Change | 2019 |
| ||||||||
Ending Occupancy | 99.8% | +30 bps | 99.5% | +0 bps | 99.5% | ||||||||
Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot | ¥ | 5,509 | 1.14% | ¥ | 5,447 | 3.38% | ¥ | 5,269 | |||||
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we reevaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, see Note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
| ● | We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We accrue fixed lease income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, when we believe substantially all lease income, including the related straight-line rent receivable, is probable of collection. Our assessment of collectability incorporates available operational performance measures such as sales and the aging of billed amounts as well as other publicly available information with respect to our tenant’s financial condition, liquidity and capital resources, including declines in such conditions due to, or amplified by, the COVID-19 pandemic. When a tenant seeks to reorganize its operations through bankruptcy proceedings, we assess the collectability of receivable balances including, among other things, the timing of a tenant’s bankruptcy filing and our expectations of the assumption by the tenant in bankruptcy proceeding of leases at the Company’s properties on substantially similar terms. In the event that we determine accrued receivables are not probable of collection, lease income will be recorded on a cash basis, with the corresponding tenant receivable and straight-line rent receivable charged as a direct write-off against lease income in the period of the change in our collectability determination. |
| ● | We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis to identify and evaluate events or changes in circumstances which indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, changes in a property’s operational performance such as declining cash flows, occupancy or total sales per square foot, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the related asset, and, if applicable, the remaining time to maturity of underlying financing arrangements. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization during the anticipated holding period plus its residual value is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to income the excess of carrying value of the property over our estimate of its fair value. We also review our investments, including investments in unconsolidated entities, to identify and evaluate whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine the fair value of the investments are less than their carrying value and such impairment is other-than-temporary. Our evaluation of changes in economic or operating conditions and whether an impairment is other-than-temporary may include developing estimates of fair value, forecasted cash flows or operating income before depreciation and amortization. We estimate undiscounted cash flows and fair value using observable and unobservable data such as operating income, hold periods, estimated capitalization and discount rates, or relevant market multiples, leasing prospects and local market information and whether certain impairments are other-than-temporary. Changes in economic and operating conditions, including changes in the financial condition of our tenants, and changes to our intent and ability to hold the related asset, that occur subsequent to our review |
62
| of recoverability of investment property and other investments could impact the assumptions used in that assessment and could result in future charges to earnings if assumptions regarding those investments differ from actual results. |
| ● | To maintain Simon’s status as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of REIT taxable income in any given year and meet certain asset and income tests. We monitor our business and transactions that may potentially impact Simon’s REIT status. In the unlikely event that we fail to maintain Simon’s REIT status, and available relief provisions do not apply, we would be required to pay U.S. federal income taxes at regular corporate income tax rates during the period Simon did not qualify as a REIT. If Simon lost its REIT status, it could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost unless its failure was due to reasonable cause and certain other conditions were met. As a result, failing to maintain REIT status would result in a significant increase in the income tax expense recorded and paid during those periods. |
| ● | In the period of a significant acquisition of real estate, we make estimates as part of our valuation of the purchase price of asset acquisitions (including the components of excess investment in joint ventures) to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component. The most significant components of our real estate valuations are typically the determination of relative fair value to the buildings as-if-vacant, land and market value of in-place leases. In the case of the fair value of buildings and fair value of land and other intangibles, our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation or amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the market value of in-place leases, we make our best estimates of the tenants’ ability to pay rents based upon the tenants’ operating performance at the property, including the competitive position of the property in its market as well as sales psf, rents psf, and overall occupancy cost for the tenants in place at the acquisition date. Our assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-place leases. |
Results of Operations
In addition to the activity discussed above in the “Results Overview” section, the following acquisitions, dispositions, and openings of consolidated properties affected our consolidated results in the comparative periods:
| ● | During 2021, we disposed of three retail properties. |
| ● | During the first quarter of 2021, we consolidated one Designer Outlet property in Europe that had previously been accounted for under the equity method. |
| ● | During the fourth quarter of 2020, we disposed of one consolidated retail property. |
| ● | On September 19, 2019, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in a hotel adjacent to one of our properties from our joint venture partner. |
| ● | During the third quarter of 2019, we disposed of two retail properties. |
In addition to the activities discussed above and in “Results Overview”, the following acquisitions, dispositions, and openings of noncontrolling interests in joint venture entities affected our income from unconsolidated entities in the comparative periods:
| ● | During the fourth quarter of 2021, we disposed of our noncontrolling interest in one retail property. |
| ● | On December 20, 2021, we sold a portion of our interest in ABG for cash consideration of $65.5 million and purchased additional interests in ABG for cash consideration of $100.0 million. Our noncontrolling interest in ABG is approximately 10.4%. |
| ● | On October 15, 2021, we opened Jeju Premium Outlet, a 92,000 square foot center in Jeju Province, South Korea. We own 50% interest in this center. |
| ● | On July 1, 2021, we contributed to ABG all of our interests in the licensing ventures of Forever 21 and Brooks Brothers for additional interests in ABG. |
| ● | On June 1, 2021, we and our partner, ABG, acquired the licensing rights of Eddie Bauer. Our non-controlling interest in the licensing venture is 49% and was acquired for cash consideration of $100.8 million. |
63
| ● | On April 12, 2021, we opened West Midlands Designer Outlet, a 197,000 square foot center in Cannock, United Kingdom. We own 23.2% interest in this center. |
| ● | In the first quarter of 2021, we and our partner, ABG, both acquired additional 12.5% interests in the licensing and operations of Forever 21 for $56.3 million bringing our interest to 50%. Subsequently the Forever 21 operations were merged into SPARC Group. |
| ● | On December 29, 2020, we completed the acquisition of an 80% ownership interest in TRG. |
| ● | On December 7, 2020, we and a group of co-investors acquired certain assets and liabilities of J.C. Penney, a department store retailer, out of bankruptcy. Our interest in the venture is 41.67%. |
| ● | On June 23, 2020, we opened Siam Premium Outlets, a 264,000 square foot center in Bangkok, Thailand. We own a 50% interest in this center. |
| ● | On February 19, 2020 we and a group of co-investors acquired certain assets and liabilities of Forever 21, a retailer of apparel and accessories, out of bankruptcy. The interests were acquired through two separate joint ventures, a licensing venture and an operating venture. Our interest in each of the retail operations venture and in the licensing venture is 37.5%. |
| ● | On February 13, 2020 through our European investee, we opened Malaga Designer Outlets, a 191,000 square foot center in Malaga, Spain. We own a 46% interest in this center. |
| ● | In January 2020, we acquired additional interests of 5.05% and 1.37% in SPARC Group, formerly known as Aeropostale and Authentic Brands Groups, LLC, or ABG, respectively. |
| ● | On October 16, 2019 we acquired a 45% interest in Rue Gilt Groupe, or RGG, to create a new multi-platform venture dedicated to digital value shopping. |
| ● | On May 22, 2019, we and our partner opened Premium Outlets Querétaro, a 274,800 square foot center in Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico. We own a 50% interest in this center. |
For the purposes of the following comparisons between the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the above transactions are referred to as the property transactions. In the following discussions of our results of operations, “comparable” refers to properties we owned and operated in both years in the year to year comparisons.
Year Ended December 31, 2021 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2020
Lease income increased $434.4 million, of which the property transactions accounted for a $17.6 million decrease. Comparable lease income increased $452.0 million, or 10.6%. Total lease income increased primarily due to an increase in variable lease income of $603.8 million primarily related to higher consideration based on tenant sales and lower negative variable lease income due to abatements granted in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by decreases in fixed minimum lease and CAM consideration recorded on a straight-line basis of $169.4 million.
Total other income increased $65.3 million, primarily due to an increase in lease settlement income of $39.8 million, a $14.9 million gain on the sale of our interest in a multi-family residential property, an $11.5 million increase related to Simon Brand Ventures and gift card revenues, a $6.8 million increase from the non-cash dilution gain on a non-retail investment, and a $3.3 million net increase in dividend, interest and other income, partially offset by a $7.8 million decrease related to higher land and outparcel sale activity in 2020, and a $3.2 million decrease related to business interruption proceeds received in 2020.
Property operating expenses increased $66.6 million primarily due to the reopening of properties that had been closed during 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of the restrictions intended to prevent its spread and cost reduction efforts, as previously discussed.
Repairs and maintenance expenses increased $15.5 million primarily due to the reopening of properties that had been closed during 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of the restrictions intended to prevent its spread and cost reduction efforts, as previously discussed.
Advertising and promotion expenses increased $15.7 million primarily due to the reopening of properties that had been closed during 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of the restrictions intended to prevent its spread and cost reduction efforts.
64
General and administrative expense increased $7.8 million primarily due to an increase in executive compensation.
Other expense increased $2.8 million primarily due to an increase in the write-off of development projects we are no longer intending to pursue, partially offset by a decrease related to legal fees.
During 2021, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $51.8 million as a result of the early redemption of unsecured notes and the payoff of mortgages at nine properties.
During 2021, we recorded gains on sale or exchange of equity interests of $178.7 million as a result of the contribution to ABG of all of our interests in the licensing ventures of Forever 21 and Brooks Brothers in exchange for additional interests in ABG and the sale of a portion of our interest in ABG, as discussed further in footnote 6.
Income and other tax (expense) benefit increased $161.8 million due to increased deferred tax expense as a result of the ABG transactions noted above which had a non-cash tax impact of $55.9 million and $92.1 million related to strong operating performance of our other platform investments as well as earnings from our acquisition of an interest in certain retailers throughout 2020.
Income from unconsolidated entities increased $563.0 million primarily due to favorable results of operations from our other platform investments, including earnings from our acquisition of an interest in J.C. Penney in the later part of 2020, and international investments which included the reversal of a previously established deferred tax liability at Klépierre resulting in a non-cash gain, of which our share was $118.4 million, partially offset by amortization of our excess investment in TRG.
During 2021, we recorded gains of $184.0 million related to the disposition of three consolidated properties, our interest in one unconsolidated property and the impact from the consolidation of one property that was previously unconsolidated, and gains of $21.2 million related to property insurance recoveries of previously depreciated assets. During 2020, we recorded $125.6 million of impairment charges related to one consolidated property, an other-than-temporary impairment on our equity investment in three joint venture properties, an other-than-temporary impairment to reduce an investment to its estimated fair value, and a $4.3 million loss, net, related to the impairment and disposition of certain assets by Klépierre, partially offset by a $12.3 million gain on the disposal of our interest in one consolidated property, a $1.9 million excess gain on insurance proceeds related to our two properties in Puerto Rico and a $1.0 million gain related to the disposition of a shopping center by one of our joint venture investments.
Simon’s net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $154.3 million due to an increase in the net income of the Operating Partnership.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2019
Lease income decreased $941.4 million, of which the property transactions accounted for $3.9 million of the decrease. Comparable lease income decreased $937.5 million, or 17.9%. Total lease income decreased primarily due to decreases in fixed minimum lease and CAM consideration recorded on a straight-line basis of $422.0 million and reduced variable lease income of $519.4 million, primarily related to lower consideration based on tenant sales and negative variable lease income due to abatements as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Total other income decreased $190.2 million, primarily due to a $75.7 million decrease related to Simon Brand Venture and gift card revenues, a $68.0 million decrease related to a gain on settlement with our former insurance broker in 2019, a $16.2 million gain on the 2019 sale of our interest in a multi-family residential property, a $10.9 million decrease in distributions from investments, a $9.1 million decrease in interest income and lower business interruption insurance proceeds received in connection with our two Puerto Rico properties as a result of hurricane damages of $5.2 million, partially offset by a $6.2 million gain on a partial sale and mark-to-market adjustment of our retained interest in a non-retail investment and a $4.1 million gain related to the sale of outparcels.
Property operating expenses decreased $104.0 million primarily due to the closure of properties as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and governmental restrictions intended to prevent its spread and cost reduction efforts, as previously discussed.
Repairs and maintenance expenses decreased $19.6 million primarily due to the closure of properties as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and governmental restrictions intended to prevent its spread and cost reduction efforts, as previously discussed.
65
Advertising and promotion decreased $51.7 million primarily due to the closure of properties as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and governmental restrictions intended to prevent its spread and cost reduction efforts, as previously discussed.
General and administrative expense decreased $12.3 million due to lower executive compensation.
Other expense increased $32.7 million primarily related to an increase in legal fees and expenses.
During 2019, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $116.3 million as a result of the early redemption of senior unsecured notes.
Income and other tax expense changed by $34.7 million primarily as a result of a higher tax benefit due to larger losses on our share of operating results in the retail operations venture of SPARC Group as compared to 2019, and reduced withholding and income taxes related to certain of our international investments, partially offset by tax expense from a bargain purchase gain recorded as a result of the acquisition of our interest in Forever 21.
Income from unconsolidated entities decreased $224.5 million primarily due to unfavorable year-over-year domestic and international property operations, as well as results of operations from our other platform investments, both of which were impacted by COVID-19 disruption, partially offset by a $35.0 million pre-tax non-cash bargain purchase gain recorded as a result of the acquisition of our interest in Forever 21 and a gain from the sale of a non-retail asset, of which our share was $17.8 million.
During 2020, we recorded $125.6 million of impairment charges related to one consolidated property, an other-than-temporary impairment on our equity investment in three joint venture properties, an other-than-temporary impairment to reduce an investment to its estimated fair value, and a $4.3 million loss, net, related to the impairment and disposition of certain assets by Klépierre, partially offset by a $12.3 million gain on the disposal of our interest in one consolidated property, a $1.9 million excess gain on insurance proceeds related to our two properties in Puerto Rico and a $1.0 million gain related to the disposition of a shopping center by one of our joint venture investments. During 2019, we recorded net gains of $62.1 million primarily related to Klépierre’s disposition of certain shopping centers, offset by a $47.2 million impairment charge related to an unconsolidated investment.
Simon’s net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $156.8 million due to a decrease in the net income of the Operating Partnership.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Because we own long-lived income-producing assets, our financing strategy relies primarily on long-term fixed rate debt. Floating rate debt comprised only 7.6% of our total consolidated debt at December 31, 2021. We also enter into interest rate protection agreements from time to time to manage our interest rate risk. We derive most of our liquidity from positive net cash flow from operations and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities that totaled $3.9 billion in the aggregate during 2021. The Credit Facilities and the Commercial Paper program provide alternative sources of liquidity as our cash needs vary from time to time. Borrowing capacity under these sources may be increased as discussed further below.
Our balance of cash and cash equivalents decreased $477.7 million during 2021 to $533.9 million as of December 31, 2021 as further discussed below.
On December 31, 2021, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of approximately $5.8 billion under the Facilities, net of outstanding borrowings of $1.18 billion, amounts outstanding under the Commercial Paper program of $500.0 million and letters of credit of $11.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the maximum aggregate outstanding balance under the Credit Facilities was $2.1 billion and the weighted average outstanding balance was $519.9 million. The weighted average interest rate was 0.85% for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Simon has historically had access to public equity markets and the Operating Partnership has historically had access to private and public, short and long-term unsecured debt markets and access to secured debt and private equity from institutional investors at the property level.
Our business model and Simon’s status as a REIT require us to regularly access the debt markets to raise funds for acquisition, development and redevelopment activity, and to refinance maturing debt. Simon may also, from time to time, access the equity capital markets to accomplish our business objectives. We believe we have sufficient cash on hand and availability under the Credit Facilities and the Commercial Paper program to address our debt maturities and capital needs through 2022.
66
Cash Flows
Our net cash flow from operating activities and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities totaled $3.9 billion during 2021. In addition, we had net repayments of debt from our debt financing and repayment activities of $0.8 billion in 2021. These activities are further discussed below under “Financing and Debt.” During 2021, we also:
| ● | funded the acquisition of the licensing venture of Eddie Bauer, acquired additional interests in the licensing and operations of Forever 21 and acquired additional interest in ABG, the aggregate cash portion of which was $257.1 million, |
| ● | paid stockholder dividends and unitholder distributions totaling approximately $2.7 billion and preferred unit distributions totaling $5.3 million, |
| ● | funded consolidated capital expenditures of $527.9 million (including development and other costs of $96.3 million, redevelopment and expansion costs of $299.8 million, and tenant costs and other operational capital expenditures of $131.8 million), |
| ● | funded investments in unconsolidated entities of $56.9 million, |
| ● | funded investments in equity instruments of $33.6 million, and |
| ● | received proceeds from the sale of equity instruments of $65.5 million. |
In general, we anticipate that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet operating expenses, monthly debt service, recurring capital expenditures, and dividends to stockholders and/or distributions to partners necessary to maintain Simon’s REIT qualification on a long-term basis. At this time, we do not expect the impact of COVID-19 to impact our ability to fund these needs for the foreseeable future; however its ultimate impact is difficult to predict. In addition, we expect to be able to generate or obtain capital for nonrecurring capital expenditures, such as acquisitions, major building redevelopments and expansions, as well as for scheduled principal maturities on outstanding indebtedness, from the following, however a severe and prolonged disruption and instability in the global financial markets, including the debt and equity capital markets, may affect our ability to access necessary capital:
| ● | excess cash generated from operating performance and working capital reserves, |
| ● | borrowings on the Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper program, |
| ● | additional secured or unsecured debt financing, or |
| ● | additional equity raised in the public or private markets. |
We expect to generate positive cash flow from operations in 2022, and we consider these projected cash flows in our sources and uses of cash. These cash flows are principally derived from rents paid by our tenants. A significant deterioration in projected cash flows from operations, including one due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions intended to restrict its spread, could cause us to increase our reliance on available funds from the Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper program, further curtail planned capital expenditures, or seek other additional sources of financing.
Financing and Debt
Unsecured Debt
At December 31, 2021, our unsecured debt consisted of $18.4 billion of senior unsecured notes of the Operating Partnership, $125.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility, $1.05 billion outstanding under the Supplemental Facility and $500.0 million outstanding under the Commercial Paper program.
The Credit Facility also included an additional single, delayed-draw $2.0 billion term loan facility, or Term Facility, or together with the Credit Facility and the Supplemental Facility, the Facilities, which the Operating Partnership drew on December 15, 2020, which was recorded in 2021.
In November 2021, we amended our Credit Facility to transition the borrowing rates from LIBOR to successor benchmark indexes. The Credit Facility can be increased in the form of additional commitments in an aggregate not to exceed $1.0 billion, for a total aggregate size of $5.0 billion, subject to obtaining additional lender commitments and satisfying certain customary conditions precedent. Borrowings may be denominated in U.S. dollars, Euro, Yen, Pounds, Sterling, Canadian dollars and Australian dollars. Borrowings in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are limited to 95% of
67
the maximum revolving credit amount, as defined. The initial maturity date of the Credit Facility is June 30, 2024. The Credit Facility can be extended for two additional six-month periods to June 30, 2025, at our sole option, subject to satisfying certain customary conditions precedent.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our election, at either (i) (x) for Term Benchmark Loans, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the applicable Local Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate, or the Adjusted TIBOR Rate, (y) for RFR Loans, if denominated in Sterling, SONIA plus a benchmark adjustment and if denominated in Dollars, Daily Simple SOFR plus a benchmark adjustment, or (z) for Daily SOFR Loans, the Adjusted Floating Overnight Daily SOFR Rate, in each case of clauses (x) through (z) above, plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.650% and 1.400% or (ii) for loans denominated in U.S. Dollars only, the base rate (which rate is equal to the greatest of the prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.500% or Adjusted Term SOFR Rate for one month plus 1.000%) (the “Base Rate”), plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.000% and 0.400%. The Credit Facility includes a facility fee determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.100% and 0.300% on the aggregate revolving commitments under the Credit Facility. Based upon our current credit ratings, the interest rate on the Credit Facility is SOFR plus 72.5 basis points, plus a spread adjustment to account for the transition from LIBOR to SOFR.
In October 2021, we amended, restated, and extended the Supplemental Facility. The Supplemental Facility’s initial borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion may be increased to $4.5 billion during its term and provides for borrowings denominated in U.S. dollars, Euro, Yen, Pounds, Sterling, Canadian dollars and Australian dollars. Borrowings in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are limited to 100% of the maximum revolving credit amount, as defined. The initial maturity date of the Supplemental Facility is January 31, 2026 and can be extended for an additional year to January 31, 2027 at our sole option, subject to satisfying certain customary conditions precedent.
Borrowings under the Supplemental Facility bear interest, at our election, at either (i) (x) for Term Benchmark Loans, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the applicable Local Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate, or the Adjusted TIBOR Rate, (y) for RFR Loans, if denominated in Sterling, SONIA plus a benchmark adjustment and if denominated in Dollars, Daily Simple SOFR plus a benchmark adjustment, or (z) for Daily SOFR Loans, the Adjusted Floating Overnight Daily SOFR Rate, in each case of clauses (x) through (z) above, plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.650% and 1.400% or (ii) for loans denominated in U.S. Dollars only, the base rate (which rate is equal to the greatest of the prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.500% or Adjusted Term SOFR Rate for one month plus 1.000%) (the “Base Rate”), plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.000% and 0.400%. The Supplemental Facility includes a facility fee determined by our corporate credit rating of between 0.100% and 0.300% on the aggregate revolving commitments under the Supplemental Facility. Based upon our current credit ratings, the interest rate on the Supplemental Facility is SOFR plus 72.5 basis points, plus a spread adjustment to account for the transition from LIBOR to SOFR.
On December 31, 2021, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of $5.8 billion under the Facilities. The maximum aggregate outstanding balance under the Facilities during the year ended December 31, 2021 was $2.1 billion and the weighted average outstanding balance was $519.9 million. Letters of credit of $11.8 million were outstanding under the Facilities as of December 31, 2021.
The Operating Partnership also has available a Commercial Paper program of $2.0 billion, or the non-U.S. dollar equivalent thereof. The Operating Partnership may issue unsecured commercial paper notes, denominated in U.S. dollars, Euro and other currencies. Notes issued in non-U.S. currencies may be issued by one or more subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership and are guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Notes will be sold under customary terms in the U.S. and Euro commercial paper note markets and rank (either by themselves or as a result of the guarantee described above) pari passu with the Operating Partnership's other unsecured senior indebtedness. The Commercial Paper program is supported by the Credit Facilities, and if necessary or appropriate, we may make one or more draws under either of the Credit Facilities to pay amounts outstanding from time to time on the Commercial Paper program. On December 31, 2021, we had $500.0 million outstanding under the Commercial Paper program, fully comprised of U.S. dollar denominated notes with a weighted average interest rate of 0.22%. These borrowings have a weighted average maturity date of January 23, 2022 and reduce amounts otherwise available under the Credit Facilities.
On July 9, 2020, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $500.0 million with a fixed interest rate of 3.50%, $750 million with a fixed interest rate of 2.650%, and $750 million with a fixed interest rate of 3.80%, with maturity dates of September 2025 (the “2025” Notes”), June 2030, and June 2050, respectively. The 2025 Notes were issued as additional notes under an indenture pursuant to which the Operating Partnership previously issued $600 million principal amount of 3.50% senior notes due September 2025 on August 17, 2015. Proceeds from the unsecured notes offering funded the optional redemption at par of senior unsecured notes in July and August 2020, as discussed below, and repaid a portion of the indebtedness under the Facilities.
68
On July 10, 2020 the Operating Partnership repaid $1.75 billion under the Credit Facility and $750.0 million under the Supplemental Facility.
On July 22, 2020, the Operating Partnership completed the optional redemption at par of its $500 million 2.50% notes due September 1, 2020.
On August 6, 2020 the Operating Partnership completed the optional redemption at par of its €375 million 2.375% notes due October 2, 2020.
On January 21, 2021 the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $800 million with a fixed interest rate of 1.750%, and $700 million with a fixed interest rate of 2.20%, with maturity dates of February 2028 and 2031, respectively.
On January 27, 2021 the Operating Partnership completed the planned optional redemption of its $550 million 2.50% notes due on July 15, 2021, including the make-whole amount. Further, on February 2, 2021 the Operating Partnership repaid $750 million under the Term Facility.
On March 19, 2021, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of €750 million ($893.0 million U.S. dollar equivalent as of the issuance date) of senior unsecured notes at a fixed rate of 1.125% with a maturity date of March 19, 2033, the proceeds of which were used on March 23, 2021 to repay the remaining $1.25 billion under the Term Facility reducing it to zero.
On August 18, 2021, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $550 million with a fixed interest rate of 1.375%, and $700 million with a fixed interest rate of 2.250%, with maturity dates of January 15, 2027, and 2032, respectively.
In the third quarter of 2021, the Operating Partnership completed the optional redemption of all of its outstanding $550 million 2.350% notes due on January 30, 2022, $600 million 2.625% notes due on June 15, 2022, and $500 million 2.750% notes due on February 1, 2023. We recorded a $28.6 million loss on extinguishment of debt as a result on the optional redemptions.
On December 14, 2021, the Operating Partnership drew $1.05 billion under the Supplemental Facility, the proceeds of which funded the early extinguishment of nine mortgages with a principal balance of $1.16 billion. We recorded a $20.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt as a result of this transaction.
On January 11, 2022, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $500 million with a floating interest rate of SOFR plus 43 basis points, and $700 million with a fixed interest rate of 2.650%, with maturity dates of January 11, 2024 and February 1, 2032, respectively. The proceeds were used to repay $1.05 billion outstanding under the Supplemental Facility on January 12, 2022.
Mortgage Debt
Total consolidated mortgage indebtedness, which is typically secured by the underlying assets and non-recourse to the Operating Partnership, was $5.4 billion and $7.0 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Covenants
Our unsecured debt agreements contain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants. If we were to fail to comply with these covenants, after the expiration of the applicable cure periods, the debt maturity could be accelerated or other remedies could be sought by the lender, including adjustments to the applicable interest rate. As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all covenants of our unsecured debt.
At December 31, 2021, our consolidated subsidiaries were the borrowers under 36 non-recourse mortgage notes secured by mortgages on 39 properties and other assets, including two separate pools of cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized mortgages encumbering a total of five properties. Under these cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage included in the cross-defaulted pool may constitute a default under all mortgages within that pool and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the pool. Certain of our secured debt instruments contain financial and other non-financial covenants which are specific to the properties that serve as collateral for that debt. If the applicable borrower under these non-recourse mortgage notes were to fail to comply with these covenants, the lender could accelerate the debt and enforce its rights against their collateral. At December 31, 2021, the applicable borrowers under these non-recourse mortgage notes were in compliance with all covenants where non-compliance could individually
69
or in the aggregate, giving effect to applicable cross-default provisions, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
Summary of Financing
Our consolidated debt, adjusted to reflect outstanding derivative instruments, and the effective weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
| Effective |
|
| Effective |
| |||||
Adjusted Balance | Weighted | Adjusted | Weighted |
| |||||||
as of | Average | Balance as of | Average |
| |||||||
Debt Subject to | December 31, 2021 |
| Interest Rate(1) | December 31, 2020 |
| Interest Rate(1) | |||||
Fixed Rate | $ | 23,364,566 |
| 2.99% | $ | 23,477,498 |
| 3.50% | |||
Variable Rate |
| 1,956,456 |
| 1.22% |
| 3,245,863 |
| 1.31% | |||
$ | 25,321,022 |
| 2.86% | $ | 26,723,361 |
| 2.98% | ||||
| (1) | Effective weighted average interest rate excludes the impact of net discounts and debt issuance costs. |
Contractual Obligations and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
In regards to long-term debt arrangements, the following table summarizes the material aspects of these future obligations on our consolidated indebtedness as of December 31, 2021, and subsequent years thereafter (dollars in thousands) assuming the obligations remain outstanding through initial maturities:
| 2022 |
| 2023-2024 |
| 2025-2026 |
| After 2026 |
| Total |
| ||||||
Long Term Debt (1) (2) | $ | 1,898,889 | $ | 4,059,530 | $ | 6,589,689 | $ | 12,861,700 | $ | 25,409,808 | ||||||
Interest Payments (3) |
| 718,712 |
| 1,308,849 |
| 977,571 |
| 3,771,163 |
| 6,776,295 | ||||||
Consolidated Capital Expenditure Commitments (3) |
| 236,318 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 236,318 | ||||||
Lease Commitments (4) |
| 32,838 |
| 66,093 |
| 66,262 |
| 855,079 |
| 1,020,272 | ||||||
| (1) | Represents principal maturities only and, therefore, excludes net discounts and debt issuance costs. |
| (2) | Variable rate interest payments are estimated based on the LIBOR or other applicable rate at December 31, 2021. |
| (3) | Represents contractual commitments for capital projects and services at December 31, 2021. Our share of estimated 2022 development, redevelopment and expansion activity is further discussed below under “Development Activity”. |
| (4) | Represents only the minimum non-cancellable lease period, excluding applicable lease extension and renewal options, unless reasonably certain of exercise. |
| (5) | The amount due in 2022 includes $500.0 million in Global Commercial Paper. |
Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of our investments in joint ventures which are common in the real estate industry and are described in Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Our joint ventures typically fund their cash needs through secured non-recourse debt financings obtained by and in the name of the joint venture entity. The joint venture debt is secured by a first mortgage, is without recourse to the joint venture partners, and does not represent a liability of the partners, except to the extent the partners or their affiliates expressly guarantee the joint venture debt. As of December 31, 2021, the Operating Partnership guaranteed joint venture-related mortgage indebtedness of $209.9 million. Mortgages guaranteed by the Operating Partnership are secured by the property of the joint venture which could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation and which has an estimated fair value in excess of the guaranteed amount. We may elect to fund cash needs of a joint venture through equity contributions (generally on a basis proportionate to our ownership interests), advances or partner loans, although such fundings are not required contractually or otherwise.
70
Hurricane Impacts
As discussed further in Note 10 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements, during the third quarter of 2017, two of our wholly-owned properties located in Puerto Rico sustained significant property damage and business interruption as a result of Hurricane Maria.
Since the date of the loss, we have received $84.0 million of insurance proceeds from third-party carriers related to the two properties located in Puerto Rico, of which $48.3 million was used for property restoration and remediation and to reduce the insurance recovery receivable. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded $2.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively, as business interruption income, which was recorded in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
During the third quarter of 2020, one of our properties located in Texas experienced property damage and business interruption as a result of Hurricane Hanna. We wrote-off assets of approximately $9.6 million, and recorded an insurance recovery receivable, and have received $14.0 million of insurance proceeds from third-party carriers. The proceeds were used for property restoration and remediation and reduced the insurance recovery receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a $3.5 million gain related to property insurance recovery of previously depreciated assets. This amount was recorded in gain (loss) on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net.
During the third quarter of 2020, one of our properties located in Louisiana experienced property damage and business interruption as a result of Hurricane Laura. We wrote-off assets of approximately $11.1 million and recorded an insurance recovery receivable, and have received $27.5 million of insurance proceeds from third-party carriers. The proceeds were used for property restoration and remediation and reduced the insurance recovery receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a $17.5 million gain related to property insurance recovery of previously depreciated assets. This amount was recorded in gain (loss) on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
Buy-sell, marketing rights, and other exit mechanisms are common in real estate partnership agreements. Most of our partners are institutional investors who have a history of direct investment in retail real estate. We and our partners in our joint venture properties may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions). If we determine it is in our best interests for us to purchase the joint venture interest and we believe we have adequate liquidity to execute the purchase without hindering our cash flows, then we may initiate these provisions or elect to buy our partner’s interest. If we decide to sell any of our joint venture interests, we expect to use the net proceeds to reduce outstanding indebtedness or to reinvest in development, redevelopment, or expansion opportunities.
Acquisitions. The Company sponsored, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a special purpose acquisition corporation, or SPAC, named Simon Property Group Acquisition Holdings, Inc. On February 18, 2021 the SPAC announced the pricing of its initial public offering, which was consummated on February 23, 2021, generating gross proceeds of $345.0 million. The SPAC is a consolidated VIE which was formed for the purpose of effecting a business combination and is targeting innovative businesses that operate within Simon’s “Live, Work, Play, Stay, Shop” ecosystem.
On July 1, 2021, we contributed to ABG all of our interests in both the Forever 21 and Brooks Brothers licensing ventures in exchange for additional interests in ABG. As a result, in the third quarter of 2021, we recognized a non-cash gain of $159.8 million representing the difference between fair value of the interests received and the carrying value of our interests in the licensing ventures, less costs to sell. On December 20, 2021, we sold a portion of our interest in ABG, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $18.8 million. In connection with this transaction, we recorded taxes of $8.0 million. Subsequently we acquired additional interests in ABG for tax consideration of $100.0 million. At December 31, 2021, our noncontrolling interest in ABG was approximately 10.4%.
In the first quarter of 2021, we and our partner, ABG, each acquired additional 12.5% interests in the licensing and operations of Forever 21, our share of which was $56.3 million, bringing our interest to 50%. Subsequently the Forever 21 operations were merged into SPARC Group.
In January 2020, we acquired additional interests of 5.05% and 1.37% in SPARC Group and ABG, respectively, for $6.7 million and $33.5 million, respectively. During the third quarter of 2020, SPARC acquired certain assets and operations of Brooks Brothers and Lucky Brands out of bankruptcy. At September 30, 2020, our noncontrolling equity method interests in the operations venture of SPARC Group and in ABG were 50.0% and 6.8%, respectively.
71
On September 19, 2019, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in a hotel adjacent to one of our properties from our joint venture partner for cash consideration of $12.8 million. As of closing, the property was subject to a $21.5 million, 4.02% variable rate mortgage.
Dispositions. We may continue to pursue the disposition of properties that no longer meet our strategic criteria or that are not a primary retail venue within their trade area.
During 2021, we recorded net gains of $176.8 million primarily related to disposition activity which included the foreclosure of three consolidated retail properties in satisfaction of their respective $180.0 million, $120.9 million and $100.0 million non-recourse mortgage loans. We also disposed of our interest in an unconsolidated property resulting in a gain of $3.4 million.
During 2020, we disposed of our interest in one consolidated retail property. A portion of the gross proceeds on this transaction of $33.4 million was used to partially repay a cross-collateralized mortgage. Our share of the $12.3 million gain is included in (loss) gain on sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
During 2019, we disposed of our interests in one multi-family residential investment. Our share of the gross proceeds on this transaction was $17.9 million. Our share of the gain of $16.2 million is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. We also recorded net gains of $62.1 million, primarily related to Klépierre’s disposition of its interests in certain shopping centers, of which our share was $58.6 million, as discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
Joint Venture Formation Activity
On June 1, 2021, we and our partner, ABG, acquired the intellectual property of Eddie Bauer. Our non-controlling interest in the licensing venture is 49% and was acquired for cash consideration of $100.8 million.
On December 29, 2020, we completed the acquisition of an 80% ownership interest in TRG, which has an ownership interest in 24 regional, super-regional, and outlet malls in the U.S. and Asia. Under the terms of the transaction, we, through the Operating Partnership, acquired all of Taubman Centers, Inc. common stock for $43.00 per share in cash. Total consideration for the acquisition, including the redemption of Taubman’s $192.5 million 6.5% Series J Cumulative Preferred Shares and its $170.0 million 6.25% Series K Cumulative Preferred Shares, and the issuance of 955,705 Operating Partnership units, was approximately $3.5 billion. Our investment includes the 6.38% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units for $362.5 million issued to us.
On December 7, 2020, we and a group of co-investors acquired certain assets and liabilities of J.C. Penney, a department store retailer, out of bankruptcy. Our noncontrolling interest in the venture is 41.67% and was acquired for cash consideration of $125.0 million.
On February 19, 2020, we and a group of co-investors acquired certain assets and liabilities of Forever 21, a retailer of apparel and accessories, out of bankruptcy. The interests were acquired through two separate joint ventures, a licensing venture and an operating venture. Our noncontrolling interest in each of the retail operations venture and in the licensing venture is 37.5%. Our aggregate investment in the ventures was $67.6 million. In connection with the acquisition of our interest, the Forever 21 joint venture recorded a non-cash bargain purchase gain of which our share of $35.0 million pre-tax is included in income from unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
Development Activity
We routinely incur costs related to construction for significant redevelopment and expansion projects at our properties. Redevelopment and expansion projects, including the addition of anchors, big box tenants, and restaurants are underway at several properties in North America, Europe, and Asia.
Construction continues on certain redevelopment and new development projects in the U.S. and internationally that are nearing completion. Our share of the costs of all new development, redevelopment and expansion projects currently under construction is approximately $944 million. Simon’s share of remaining net cash funding required to complete the new development and redevelopment projects currently under construction is approximately $263 million. We expect to fund these capital projects with cash flows from operations. We seek a stabilized return on invested capital in the range of 7-10% for all of our new development, expansion and redevelopment projects.
72
Summary of Capital Expenditures. The following table summarizes total capital expenditures on consolidated properties on a cash basis (in millions):
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
New Developments | $ | 96 | $ | 27 | $ | 73 | ||||
Redevelopments and Expansions |
| 300 |
| 399 |
| 498 | ||||
Tenant Allowances |
| 127 |
| 53 |
| 162 | ||||
Operational Capital Expenditures |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 143 | ||||
Total | $ | 528 | $ | 484 | $ | 876 | ||||
International Development Activity
We typically reinvest net cash flow from our international joint ventures to fund future international development activity. We believe this strategy mitigates some of the risk of our initial investment and our exposure to changes in foreign currencies. We have also funded most of our foreign investments with local currency-denominated borrowings that act as a natural hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates. Our consolidated net income exposure to changes in the volatility of the Euro, Yen, Peso, Won, and other foreign currencies is not material. We expect our share of estimated committed capital for international development projects to be completed with projected delivery in 2022 or 2023 is $172 million, primarily funded through reinvested joint venture cash flow and construction loans.
The following table describes recently completed and new development and expansion projects as well as our share of the estimated total cost as of December 31, 2021 (in millions):
Gross | Our | Our Share of | Our Share of | Projected/Actual | ||||||||||
Leasable | Ownership | Projected Net Cost | Projected Net Cost | Opening | ||||||||||
Property |
| Location |
| Area (sqft) |
| Percentage |
| (in Local Currency) |
| (in USD) (1) |
| Date | ||
New Development Projects: | ||||||||||||||
West Midlands Designer Outlet | Cannock (West Midlands), England | 197,000 | 23% | GBP | 31.2 | $ | 42.2 | Opened Apr. - 2021 | ||||||
Jeju Premium Outlets | Jeju Province, South Korea | 92,000 | 50% | KRW | 12,328 | $ | 10.4 | Opened Oct. - 2021 | ||||||
Fukaya-Hanazono Premium Outlets | Fukaya City, Japan | 292,500 | 40% | JPY | 6,153 | $ | 53.5 | Oct. - 2022 | ||||||
Paris-Giverny Designer Outlet | Vernon (Normandy), France | 220,000 | 74% | EUR | 119.5 | $ | 135.6 | Jan. - 2023 | ||||||
Expansions: | ||||||||||||||
La Reggia Designer Outlet Phase 3 | Marcianise (Naples), Italy | 56,000 | 92% | EUR | 18.8 | $ | 21.3 | Opened Oct. - 2021 | ||||||
| (1) | USD equivalent based upon December 31, 2021 foreign currency exchange rates. |
Dividends, Distributions and Stock Repurchase Program
Simon paid a common stock dividend of $1.65 per share in the fourth quarter of 2021 and $7.15 per share for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Operating Partnership paid distributions per unit for the same amounts. In 2020, Simon paid dividends of $1.30 and $4.70 per share for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2020, respectively. The Operating Partnership paid distributions per unit for the same amounts. On February 7, 2022, Simon’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend for the first quarter of 2022 of $1.65 per share, payable on March 31, 2022 to shareholders of record on March 10, 2022. The distribution rate on units is equal to the dividend rate on common stock. In order to maintain its status as a REIT, Simon must pay a minimum amount of dividends. Simon’s future dividends and the Operating Partnership’s future distributions will be determined by Simon’s Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, based on actual and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, cash available for dividends and limited partner distributions, cash reserves as deemed necessary for capital and operating expenditures, financing covenants, if any, and the amount required to maintain Simon’s status as a REIT.
On February 13, 2017, Simon’s Board of Directors authorized a two-year extension of the previously authorized $2.0 billion common stock repurchase plan through March 31, 2019. On February 11, 2019, Simon's Board of Directors authorized a new common stock repurchase plan. Under the plan, Simon was authorized to repurchase up to $2.0 billion of its common stock during the two-year period ending February 11, 2021 in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as market conditions warranted. The Repurchase Program was not extended. During the year ended
73
December 31, 2020, Simon purchased 1,245,654 shares at an average price of $122.50 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2019, Simon purchased 2,247,074 shares at an average price of $160.11 per share, of which 46,377 shares at an average price of $164.49 were purchased as part of the previous program. As Simon repurchased shares under these programs, the Operating Partnership repurchased an equal number of units from Simon.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may be deemed forward–looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward–looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward–looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to: uncertainties regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and governmental restrictions intended to prevent its spread on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and liquidity and our ability to access the capital markets, satisfy our debt service obligations and make distributions to our stockholders; changes in economic and market conditions that may adversely affect the general retail environment; the potential loss of anchor stores or major tenants; the inability to collect rent due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise; the intensely competitive market environment in the retail industry, including e-commerce; an increase in vacant space at our properties; the inability to lease newly developed properties and renew leases and relet space at existing properties on favorable terms; our international activities subjecting us to risks that are different from or greater than those associated with our domestic operations, including changes in foreign exchange rates; risks associated with the acquisition, development, redevelopment, expansion, leasing and management of properties; general risks related to real estate investments, including the illiquidity of real estate investments; the impact of our substantial indebtedness on our future operations, including covenants in the governing agreements that impose restrictions on us that may affect our ability to operate freely; any disruption in the financial markets that may adversely affect our ability to access capital for growth and satisfy our ongoing debt service requirements; any change in our credit rating; changes in market rates of interest; the transition of LIBOR to an alternative reference rate; our continued ability to maintain our status as a REIT; changes in tax laws or regulations that result in adverse tax consequences; risks relating to our joint venture properties, including guarantees of certain joint venture indebtedness; environmental liabilities; natural disasters; the availability of comprehensive insurance coverage; the potential for terrorist activities; security breaches that could compromise our information technology or infrastructure; and the loss of key management personnel; and. We discussed these and other risks and uncertainties under the heading Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We may update that discussion in subsequent other periodic reports, but except as required by law, we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Industry practice is to evaluate real estate properties in part based on performance measures such as FFO, diluted FFO per share, NOI, and portfolio NOI. We believe that these non-GAAP measures are helpful to investors because they are widely recognized measures of the performance of REITs and provide a relevant basis for comparison among REITs. We also use these measures internally to measure the operating performance of our portfolio.
We determine FFO based upon the definition set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) Funds From Operations White Paper – 2018 Restatement. Our main business includes acquiring, owning, operating, developing, and redeveloping real estate in conjunction with the rental of real estate. Gains and losses of assets incidental to our main business are included in FFO. We determine FFO to be our share of consolidated net income computed in accordance with GAAP:
| ● | excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization, |
| ● | excluding gains and losses from extraordinary items, |
| ● | excluding gains and losses from the sale, disposal or property insurance recoveries of, or any impairment related to, depreciable retail operating properties, |
| ● | plus the allocable portion of FFO of unconsolidated joint ventures based upon economic ownership interest, and |
| ● | all determined on a consistent basis in accordance with GAAP. |
74
You should understand that our computations of these non-GAAP measures might not be comparable to similar measures reported by other REITs and that these non-GAAP measures:
| ● | do not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP, |
| ● | should not be considered as an alternative to net income determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of operating performance, and |
| ● | are not an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. |
The following schedule reconciles total FFO to consolidated net income and, for Simon, diluted net income per share to diluted FFO per share.
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
Funds from Operations (A) | $ | 4,486,964 | $ | 3,236,963 | $ | 4,272,271 | ||||
Change in FFO from prior period |
| 38.6 | % |
| (24.2) | % |
| (1.2) | % | |
Consolidated Net Income | $ | 2,568,707 | $ | 1,277,324 | $ | 2,423,188 | ||||
Adjustments to Arrive at FFO: | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization from consolidated properties |
| 1,254,039 |
| 1,308,419 |
| 1,329,843 | ||||
Our share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated entities, including Klépierre, TRG and other corporate investments (B) |
| 887,390 |
| 536,133 |
| 551,596 | ||||
(Gain) loss on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net |
| (206,855) |
| 114,960 |
| (14,883) | ||||
Unrealized losses in fair value of equity instruments | 3,177 | 19,632 | 8,212 | |||||||
Net loss (gain) attributable to noncontrolling interest holders in properties |
| 6,053 |
| 4,378 |
| (991) | ||||
Noncontrolling interests portion of depreciation and amortization and gain on consolidation of properties |
| (20,295) |
| (18,631) |
| (19,442) | ||||
Preferred distributions and dividends |
| (5,252) |
| (5,252) |
| (5,252) | ||||
FFO of the Operating Partnership (A) | $ | 4,486,964 | $ | 3,236,963 | $ | 4,272,271 | ||||
FFO allocable to limited partners |
| 564,407 |
| 424,063 |
| 563,342 | ||||
Dilutive FFO allocable to common stockholders (A) | $ | 3,922,557 | $ | 2,812,900 | $ | 3,708,929 | ||||
Diluted net income per share to diluted FFO per share reconciliation: | ||||||||||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 6.84 | $ | 3.59 | $ | 6.81 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization from consolidated properties and our share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated entities, including Klépierre, TRG and other corporate investments, net of noncontrolling interests portion of depreciation and amortization (B) |
| 5.64 |
| 5.14 |
| 5.25 | ||||
(Gain) loss on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net |
| (0.55) |
| 0.32 |
| (0.04) | ||||
Unrealized losses in fair value of equity instruments | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||||||
Diluted FFO per share (A) | $ | 11.94 | $ | 9.11 | $ | 12.04 | ||||
Basic and Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
| 328,587 |
| 308,738 |
| 307,950 | ||||
Weighted average limited partnership units outstanding |
| 47,280 |
| 46,544 |
| 46,774 | ||||
Basic and Diluted weighted average shares and units outstanding |
| 375,867 |
| 355,282 |
| 354,724 | ||||
| (A) | Includes FFO of the Operating Partnership related to a loss on extinguishment of debt of $116.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Includes Diluted FFO per share/unit related to a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.33 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Includes Diluted FFO allocable to common stockholders related to a loss on extinguishment of debt of $100.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
75
| (B) | The twelve months ended December 31, 2021 include amortization of our excess investment in TRG of $201.7 million, which includes $56.6 million of additional amortization expense related to the nine months ended September 30, 2021 as a result of the finalization of purchase accounting. |
The following schedule reconciles consolidated net income to our beneficial share of NOI.
For the Year | ||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | |||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Reconciliation of NOI of consolidated entities: |
|
| ||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ | 2,568,707 | $ | 1,277,324 | ||
Income and other tax expense (benefit) |
| 157,199 |
| (4,637) | ||
Gain on sale or exchange of equity interests | (178,672) | |||||
Interest expense |
| 795,712 |
| 784,400 | ||
Income from unconsolidated entities |
| (782,837) |
| (219,870) | ||
Loss on extinguishment of debt | 51,841 | -- | ||||
Unrealized losses in fair value of equity instruments |
| 8,095 |
| 19,632 | ||
(Gain) loss on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net |
| (206,855) |
| 114,960 | ||
Operating Income Before Other Items |
| 2,413,190 |
| 1,971,809 | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 1,262,715 |
| 1,318,008 | ||
Home and regional office costs | 184,660 | 171,668 | ||||
General and administrative | 30,339 | 22,572 | ||||
Other expenses (1) | 19,811 | -- | ||||
NOI of consolidated entities | $ | 3,910,715 | $ | 3,484,057 | ||
Less: Noncontrolling interest partners share of NOI | (20,720) | (19,745) | ||||
Beneficial NOI of consolidated entities | $ | 3,889,995 | $ | 3,464,312 | ||
Reconciliation of NOI of unconsolidated entities: | ||||||
Net Income | $ | 668,061 | $ | 453,816 | ||
Interest expense |
| 605,591 |
| 616,332 | ||
Gain on sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, net |
| (34,814) |
| — | ||
Operating Income Before Other Items |
| 1,238,838 |
| 1,070,148 | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 686,790 |
| 692,424 | ||
Other expenses (1) | 26,013 | — | ||||
NOI of unconsolidated entities | $ | 1,951,641 | $ | 1,762,572 | ||
Less: Joint Venture partners share of NOI | (1,021,839) | (921,147) | ||||
Beneficial NOI of unconsolidated entities | $ | 929,802 | $ | 841,425 | ||
Add: NOI from TRG | 430,965 | — | ||||
Add: NOI from Other Platform Investments and Investments | 743,213 | 253,093 | ||||
Beneficial interest of Combined NOI | $ | 5,993,975 | $ | 4,558,830 | ||
Less: Corporate and Other NOI Sources (2) |
| 172,844 |
| 178,009 | ||
Less: NOI from Other Platform Investments | 533,299 | 21,507 | ||||
Less: NOI from Investments (3) | 203,223 | 201,240 | ||||
Portfolio NOI | $ | 5,084,609 | $ | 4,158,074 | ||
Portfolio NOI Change | 22.3 | % | ||||
| (1) | Represents the write-off of pre-development costs, our beneficial interest of which was $18.3 million with respect to consolidated entities and $13.0 million with respect to our share of unconsolidated entities, for the year ended December 31, 2021. |
76
| (2) | Includes income components excluded from portfolio NOI and domestic property NOI (domestic lease termination income, interest income, land sale gains, straight line lease income, above/below market lease adjustments), unrealized and realized gains/losses on non-real estate related equity instruments, Simon management company revenues, and other assets. |
| (3) | Includes our share of NOI of Klépierre (at constant currency) and other corporate investments. |
Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates primarily relates to our long-term debt obligations. We manage exposure to interest rate market risk through our risk management strategy by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of variable rate debt. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on financings of certain foreign operations. Our intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposures. We do not enter into either interest rate protection or foreign currency rate protection agreements for speculative purposes.
We may enter into treasury lock agreements as part of anticipated issuances of senior notes. Upon completion of the debt issuance, the cost of these instruments is recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt agreement.
Our future earnings, cash flows and fair values relating to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market rates of interest, primarily SOFR and LIBOR. Based upon consolidated indebtedness and interest rates at December 31, 2021, a 50 basis point increase in the market rates of interest would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $9.9 million, and would decrease the fair value of debt by approximately $791.9 million.
77
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Simon Property Group, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Simon Property Group, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 24, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ | |
|
78
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated February 24, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Purchase Accounting for the Investment in Taubman Realty Group | ||||
Description of the Matter | On December 29, 2020, the Company completed its acquisition of an 80% non-controlling ownership interest in Taubman Realty Group (TRG) for consideration of $3.1 billion, as described in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements. The Company allocates any excess investment in unconsolidated entities to the various components of an acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component which may be derived from various observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions, as described in Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements. The components typically include buildings, land and intangibles related to in-place leases. Auditing management’s purchase accounting for the Company’s acquisition of an equity method interest in TRG is complex due to the judgmental nature of numerous assumptions made by management when determining the estimated fair value of the various components of the acquisition. In particular, the acquisition purchase accounting was sensitive to significant assumptions including, but not limited to, forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization, capitalization rates and comparable market values for land. | |||
79
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process for purchase accounting for the investment in TRG, including controls over management’s review of the assumptions described above.
To test the Company’s purchase accounting for the investment in TRG, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used in the valuation models, evaluating the assumptions used by management in its allocation of the purchase price to the various components of excess investment, and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the assumptions. We compared significant assumptions used to external market data to assess whether the assumptions were market supported. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in the assessment of the methodology utilized by the Company and to test certain of the assumptions including capitalization rates and the valuation of land. We also compared the forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization used in the valuations to historical actual results and market-supported data, evaluated significant variances, including consideration of the current economic environment, and performed certain sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact on the purchase accounting allocations. We also tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data included in the valuation models. | |||
Evaluation of Investment Properties for Impairment | ||||
Description of the Matter | At December 31, 2021, the Company’s consolidated net investment properties totaled $22.3 billion. In addition, a significant number of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities and its investments in Klépierre and TRG hold investment properties. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company reviews investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis to identify and evaluate events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of an investment property may not be recoverable. The Company estimates undiscounted cash flows of an investment property using observable and unobservable inputs such as historical and forecasted cash flows, operating income before depreciation and amortization, estimated capitalization rates, leasing prospects and local market information. Auditing management’s evaluation of investment properties for impairment was complex due to the estimation uncertainty in determining the undiscounted cash flows of an investment property. In particular, the impairment evaluation for investment properties was sensitive to significant assumptions such as forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization, and capitalization rates, all of which can be affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions, demand, and competition. |
80
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process for evaluating investment properties for impairment, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above. To test the Company’s evaluation of investment properties for impairment, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies applied, evaluating the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by management in its analysis. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, relevant market information, and other applicable sources. We also involved a valuation specialist to assist in evaluating certain assumptions. In addition, we compared the forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization to historical actual results and evaluated significant variances, including consideration of the current economic environment. As part of our evaluation, we assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the undiscounted cash flows of the related investment property that would result from changes in the assumptions. | |
Description of the Matter | At December 31, 2021, the carrying value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities and its investments in Klépierre and TRG totaled $8.0 billion. As explained in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company reviews investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an investment in an unconsolidated entity may not be recoverable. To identify and evaluate whether an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of an investment below its carrying value has occurred, the Company assesses economic and operating conditions that may affect the fair value of the investment. The evaluation of operating conditions may include developing estimates of forecasted cash flows or operating income before depreciation and amortization to support the recoverability of the carrying amount of the investment. When required, the Company estimates the fair value of an investment and assesses whether any impairment is other than temporary using observable and unobservable inputs such as historical and forecasted cash flows or operating income before depreciation and amortization, estimated capitalization and discount rates, or relevant market multiples, leasing prospects and local market information. Auditing management’s evaluation of investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment was complex due to the estimation uncertainty in determining the forecasted cash flows, operating income before depreciation and amortization, estimated fair value of the investment and whether any decline in fair value below the related investment’s carrying amount is other-than-temporary. In particular, the impairment evaluation for these investments was sensitive to significant assumptions such as forecasted cash flows, operating income before depreciation and amortization, relevant market multiples, and capitalization and discount rates, all of which can be affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions, demand, and competition. |
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process for evaluating investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above. To test the Company’s evaluation of investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies applied, evaluating the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of data used by management in its analysis. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, relevant market information, and other applicable sources. We also involved a valuation specialist to assist in evaluating certain assumptions. In addition, we compared the forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization to historical actual results and evaluated significant variances, including consideration of the current economic environment. As part of our evaluation, we assessed |
81
the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the cash flows and the fair value of the related investment that would result from changes in the assumptions, and we evaluated whether a decline in fair value below the related investment’s carrying value was other-than-temporary. |
/s/ Ernst Young LLP | |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002. | |
Indianapolis, Indiana |
82
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners of Simon Property Group, L.P. and the Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Simon Property Group, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Simon Property Group, L.P. (the Partnership) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 24, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst Young LLP | |
Indianapolis, Indiana February 24, 2022 |
83
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners of Simon Property Group, L.P. and the Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021 and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated February 24, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Purchase Accounting for the Investment in Taubman Realty Group | ||||||||||
Description of the Matter | On December 29, 2020, the Partnership completed its acquisition of an 80% non-controlling ownership interest in Taubman Realty Group (TRG) for consideration of $3.1 billion, as described in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements. The Partnership allocates any excess investment in unconsolidated entities to the various components of an acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component which may be derived from various observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions, as described in Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements. The components typically include buildings, land and intangibles related to in-place leases. Auditing management’s purchase accounting for the Partnership’s acquisition of an equity method interest in TRG is complex due to the judgmental nature of numerous assumptions made by management when determining the estimated fair value of the various components of the acquisition. In particular, the acquisition purchase accounting was sensitive to significant assumptions including, | |||||||||
84
but not limited to, forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization, capitalization rates and comparable market values for land. | ||||||||||
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Partnership’s process for purchase accounting for the investment in TRG, including controls over management’s review of the assumptions described above. To test the Partnership’s purchase accounting for the investment in TRG, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used in the valuation models, evaluating the assumptions used by management in its allocation of the purchase price to the various components of excess investment, and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the assumptions. We compared significant assumptions used to external market data to assess whether the assumptions were market supported. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in the assessment of the methodology utilized by the Partnership and to test certain of the assumptions including capitalization rates and the valuation of land. We also compared the forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization used in the valuations to historical actual results and market-supported data, evaluated significant variances, including consideration of the current economic environment, and performed certain sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact on the purchase accounting allocations. We also tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data included in the valuation models. | |||||||||
Evaluation of Investment Properties for Impairment | ||||||||||
Description of the Matter | At December 31, 2021, the Partnership’s consolidated net investment properties totaled $22.3 billion. In addition, a significant number of the Partnership’s investments in unconsolidated entities and its investments in Klépierre and TRG hold investment properties. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership reviews investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis to identify and evaluate events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of an investment property may not be recoverable. The Partnership estimates undiscounted cash flows of an investment property using observable and unobservable inputs such as historical and forecasted cash flows, operating income before depreciation and amortization, estimated capitalization rates, leasing prospects and local market information. Auditing management’s evaluation of investment properties for impairment was complex due to the estimation uncertainty in determining the undiscounted cash flows of an investment property. In particular, the impairment evaluation for investment properties was sensitive to significant assumptions such as forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization, and capitalization rates, all of which can be affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions, demand, and competition. | |||||||||
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Partnership’s process for evaluating investment properties for impairment, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above.
To test the Partnership’s evaluation of investment properties for impairment, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies applied, evaluating the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by management in its analysis. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, relevant market information, and other applicable sources. We also involved a valuation specialist to assist in evaluating certain assumptions. In addition, we compared the forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization to historical actual results and evaluated significant variances, including consideration of the current economic environment. As part of our evaluation, we assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the undiscounted cash flows of the related investment property that would result from changes in the assumptions. | |||||||||
85
Evaluation of Investments in Unconsolidated Entities for Impairment | ||||||||||
Description of the Matter | At December 31, 2021, the carrying value of the Partnership’s investments in unconsolidated entities and its investments in Klépierre and TRG totaled $8.0 billion. As explained in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership reviews investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an investment in an unconsolidated entity may not be recoverable. To identify and evaluate whether an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of an investment below its carrying value has occurred, the Partnership assesses economic and operating conditions that may affect the fair value of the investment. The evaluation of operating conditions may include developing estimates of forecasted cash flows or operating income before depreciation and amortization to support the recoverability of the carrying amount of the investment. When required, the Partnership estimates the fair value of an investment and assesses whether any impairment is other than temporary using observable and unobservable inputs such as historical and forecasted cash flows or operating income before depreciation and amortization, estimated capitalization and discount rates, or relevant market multiples, leasing prospects and local market information. Auditing management’s evaluation of investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment was complex due to the estimation uncertainty in determining the forecasted cash flows, operating income before depreciation and amortization, estimated fair value of the investment and whether any decline in fair value below the related investment’s carrying amount is other-than-temporary. In particular, the impairment evaluation for these investments was sensitive to significant assumptions such as forecasted cash flows, operating income before depreciation and amortization, relevant market multiples, and capitalization and discount rates, all of which can be affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions, demand, and competition. | |||||||||
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Partnership’s process for evaluating investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above. To test the Partnership’s evaluation of investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies applied, evaluating the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of data used by management in its analysis. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, relevant market information, and other applicable sources. We also involved a valuation specialist to assist in evaluating certain assumptions. In addition, we compared the forecasted cash flows and operating income before depreciation and amortization to historical actual results and evaluated significant variances, including consideration of the current economic environment. As part of our evaluation, we assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the cash flows and the fair value of the related investment that would result from changes in the assumptions, and we evaluated whether a decline in fair value below the related investment’s carrying value was other-than-temporary. | |||||||||
/s/ | |
We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2002. February 24, 2022 |
86
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| |||
2021 | 2020 |
| |||||
ASSETS: | |||||||
Investment properties, at cost | $ | | $ | | |||
Less - accumulated depreciation |
| |
| | |||
| |
| | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| |
| | |||
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net |
| |
| | |||
Investment in TRG, at equity |
| |
| | |||
Investment in Klépierre, at equity |
| |
| | |||
Investment in other unconsolidated entities, at equity | | | |||||
Right-of-use assets, net | | | |||||
Investments held in trust - special purpose acquisition company | | — | |||||
Deferred costs and other assets |
| |
| | |||
Total assets | $ | | $ | | |||
LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Mortgages and unsecured indebtedness | $ | | $ | | |||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues |
| |
| | |||
Cash distributions and losses in unconsolidated entities, at equity |
| |
| | |||
Dividend payable | | | |||||
Lease liabilities | | | |||||
Other liabilities |
| |
| | |||
Total liabilities |
| |
| | |||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Limited partners’ preferred interest in the Operating Partnership and noncontrolling redeemable interests |
| |
| | |||
EQUITY: | |||||||
Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||
Capital stock ( | |||||||
Series J 83/8% cumulative redeemable preferred stock, |
| |
| | |||
Common stock, $ |
| |
| | |||
Class B common stock, $ |
|
| |||||
Capital in excess of par value |
| |
| | |||
Accumulated deficit |
| ( |
| ( | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| ( |
| ( | |||
Common stock held in treasury, at cost, |
| ( |
| ( | |||
Total stockholders’ equity |
| |
| | |||
Noncontrolling interests |
| |
| | |||
Total equity |
| |
| | |||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | | $ | | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
87
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Year |
| |||||||||
Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
REVENUE: | ||||||||||
Lease income | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Management fees and other revenues |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Other income |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Total revenue |
| |
| |
| | ||||
EXPENSES: | ||||||||||
Property operating |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Real estate taxes |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Repairs and maintenance |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Advertising and promotion |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Home and regional office costs |
| |
| |
| | ||||
General and administrative |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Other |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Total operating expenses |
| |
| |
| | ||||
OPERATING INCOME BEFORE OTHER ITEMS |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Interest expense |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt | ( | — | ( | |||||||
Gain on sale or exchange of equity interests (Note 6) | | — | — | |||||||
Income and other tax (expense) benefit |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Income from unconsolidated entities |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Unrealized losses in fair value of equity instruments | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Gain (loss) on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net |
| |
| ( |
| | ||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME | | | | |||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Preferred dividends |
| |
| |
| | ||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative hedge agreements |
| |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Net (gain) loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings |
| ( |
| ( |
| | ||||
Currency translation adjustments |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other |
| ( |
| |
| | ||||
Comprehensive income |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
88
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Year |
| |||||||||
Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | | — | | |||||||
(Gain) loss upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment, net |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Gain on sale or exchange of equity interests | ( | — | — | |||||||
Unrealized losses in fair value of equity instruments | | | | |||||||
Straight-line lease loss (income) |
| |
| |
| ( | ||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Changes in assets and liabilities | ||||||||||
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net |
| |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Deferred costs and other assets |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, deferred revenues and other |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| |
| |
| | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Funding of loans to related parties |
| ( |
| ( |
| — | ||||
Repayments of loans to related parties |
| |
| — |
| | ||||
Capital expenditures, net |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Cash impact from the consolidation of properties |
| |
| — |
| | ||||
Net proceeds from sale of assets |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Investments in unconsolidated entities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Purchase of equity instruments |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Proceeds from sales of equity instruments |
| |
| |
| — | ||||
Insurance proceeds for property restoration | | | | |||||||
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities and other |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of common stock and other, net of transaction costs |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Purchase of shares related to stock grant recipients' tax withholdings | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Redemption of limited partner units |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Purchase of treasury stock | — | ( | ( | |||||||
Proceeds from the special purpose acquisition company IPO, net of transaction costs | | — | — | |||||||
Establishment of trust account for special purpose acquisition company |
| ( |
| — |
| — | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in properties |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Preferred distributions of the Operating Partnership |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Distributions to stockholders and preferred dividends |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Distributions to limited partners |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Cash paid to extinguish debt | ( | — | ( | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of transaction costs |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Repayments of debt | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
| ( |
| |
| | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
| |
| |
| | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
89
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
| Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Capital in | Common Stock |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Income | Excess of Par | Accumulated | Held in | Noncontrolling | Total |
| |||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | (Loss) | Value | Deficit | Treasury | Interests | Equity |
| |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | | $ | | $ | ( | $ | | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Exchange of limited partner units ( | | ( | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Series J preferred stock premium amortization | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock incentive program ( | ( | | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of limited partner units ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock incentive | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchase ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term incentive performance units | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of unit equivalents and other ( | | ( | ( | | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on hedging activities | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | | |
| | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership | | ( | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common stockholders and limited partners, excluding Operating Partnership preferred interests | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution to other noncontrolling interest partners | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income, excluding $ | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | | $ | | $ | ( | $ | | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Exchange of limited partner units ( | | ( | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of limited partner units ( | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Public offering of common stock ( | | | — | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Series J preferred stock premium amortization | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock incentive program ( | ( | | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of limited partner units ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock incentive | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchase ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term incentive performance units | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of unit equivalents and other ( | | | ( | ( | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on hedging activities | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership | ( | | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common stockholders and limited partners, excluding Operating Partnership preferred interests | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution to other noncontrolling interest partners | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income, excluding $ | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2020 | $ | | $ | | $ | ( | $ | | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
90
|
|
| Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive | Capital in | Common Stock |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Income | Excess of Par | Accumulated | Held in | Noncontrolling | Total |
| |||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | (Loss) | Value | Deficit | Treasury | Interests | Equity |
| |||||||||||||||||
Exchange of limited partner units ( | | ( | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Series J preferred stock premium amortization | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock incentive program ( | ( | | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of limited partner units ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock incentive | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term incentive performance units | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of unit equivalents and other ( | | ( | ( | | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on hedging activities | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership | | ( | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common stockholders and limited partners, excluding Operating Partnership preferred interests | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution to other noncontrolling interest partners | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income, excluding $ | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | | $ | | $ | ( | $ | | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
91
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except unit amounts)
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| |||
2021 | 2020 |
| |||||
ASSETS: | |||||||
Investment properties, at cost | $ | | $ | | |||
Less — accumulated depreciation |
| |
| | |||
| |
| | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| |
| | |||
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net |
| |
| | |||
Investment in TRG, at equity |
| |
| | |||
Investment in Klépierre, at equity |
| |
| | |||
Investment in other unconsolidated entities, at equity | | | |||||
Right-of-use assets, net | | | |||||
Investments held in trust - special purpose acquisition company | | — | |||||
Deferred costs and other assets |
| |
| | |||
Total assets | $ | | $ | | |||
LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Mortgages and unsecured indebtedness | $ | | $ | | |||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues |
| |
| | |||
Cash distributions and losses in unconsolidated entities, at equity |
| |
| | |||
Distribution payable | | | |||||
Lease liabilities | | | |||||
Other liabilities |
| |
| | |||
Total liabilities |
| |
| | |||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Preferred units, various series, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests |
| |
| | |||
EQUITY: | |||||||
Partners’ Equity | |||||||
Preferred units, |
| |
| | |||
General Partner, |
| |
| | |||
Limited Partners, |
| |
| | |||
Total partners’ equity |
| |
| | |||
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in properties, net |
| |
| | |||
Total equity |
| |
| | |||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | | $ | | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
92
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
| For the Year |
| ||||||||
| Ended December 31, |
| ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| ||||||
REVENUE: |
|
| ||||||||
Lease income | $ | $ | $ | | ||||||
Management fees and other revenues |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Other income |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Total revenue |
|
|
| | ||||||
EXPENSES: | ||||||||||
Property operating |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
| | ||||||
Real estate taxes |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Repairs and maintenance |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Advertising and promotion |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Home and regional office costs |
| |
| |
| | ||||
General and administrative |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Other |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
| | ||||||
OPERATING INCOME BEFORE OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
| | ||||||
Interest expense |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt | ( | — | ( | |||||||
Gain on sale or exchange of equity interests (Note 6) | | — | — | |||||||
Income and other tax (expense) benefit |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Income from unconsolidated entities |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Unrealized losses in fair value of equity instruments | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Gain (loss) on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net |
| |
| ( |
| | ||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME |
|
|
| | ||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| ( |
| ( |
| | ||||
Preferred unit requirements |
| |
| |
| | ||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS | $ | $ | $ | | ||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS ATTRIBUTABLE TO: | ||||||||||
General Partner | $ | $ | $ | | ||||||
Limited Partners |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Net income attributable to unitholders | $ | $ | $ | | ||||||
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT: | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to unitholders | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ | $ | $ | | ||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative hedge agreements |
| |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Net (gain) loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings |
| ( |
| ( |
| | ||||
Currency translation adjustments |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other |
| ( |
| |
| | ||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
| | ||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| ( |
| |
| | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to unitholders | $ | $ | $ | | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
93
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Year |
| |||||||||
Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
| |||||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | | — | | |||||||
(Gain) loss on acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment, net |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Gain on sale or exchange of equity interests | ( | — | — | |||||||
Unrealized losses in fair value of equity instruments | | | | |||||||
Straight-line lease loss (income) |
| |
| |
| ( | ||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Changes in assets and liabilities | ||||||||||
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net |
| |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Deferred costs and other assets |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, deferred revenues and other |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| |
| |
| | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Funding of loans to related parties | ( | ( | — | |||||||
Repayments of loans to related parties |
| |
| — |
| | ||||
Capital expenditures, net |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Cash impact from the consolidation of properties |
| |
| — |
| | ||||
Net proceeds from sale of assets | | | | |||||||
Investments in unconsolidated entities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Purchase of equity instruments |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Proceeds from sale of equity instruments |
| |
| |
| — | ||||
Insurance proceeds for property restoration | | | | |||||||
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities and other |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||
Issuance of units and other |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
Purchase of units related to stock grant recipients' tax withholdings |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Redemption of limited partner units | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Purchase of general partner units | — | ( | ( | |||||||
Proceeds from the special purpose acquisition company IPO, net of transaction costs | | — | — | |||||||
Establishment of trust account for special purpose acquisition company | ( | — | — | |||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in properties |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Partnership distributions |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Cash paid to extinguish debt | ( | — | ( | |||||||
Mortgage and unsecured indebtedness proceeds, net of transaction costs |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Mortgage and unsecured indebtedness principal payments |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
| ( |
| |
| ( | ||||
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
| ( |
| |
| | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
| |
| |
| | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
94
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in thousands)
Preferred | Simon (Managing | Limited | Noncontrolling | Total |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Units |
| General Partner) |
| Partners |
| Interests |
| Equity |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Series J preferred stock premium and amortization | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
Limited partner units exchanged to common units ( | | ( | — | |||||||||||||
Stock incentive program ( | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock incentive | | | ||||||||||||||
Redemption of limited partner units ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Treasury unit purchase ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
Long-term incentive performance units | | | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of unit equivalents and other ( | ( | | ( | |||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on hedging activities | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other | | | | |||||||||||||
Net loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | | | | |||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | | | | |||||||||||||
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership | | ( | — | |||||||||||||
Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||
Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $ | | | | | | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Issuance of limited partner units ( | | | ||||||||||||||
Series J preferred stock premium and amortization | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
Limited partner units exchanged to common units ( | | ( | — | |||||||||||||
Issuance of units related to Simon's public offering of its common stock ( | | | ||||||||||||||
Stock incentive program ( | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock incentive | | | ||||||||||||||
Redemption of limited partner units ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Treasury unit purchase ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
Long-term incentive performance units | | | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of unit equivalents and other ( | | ( | | |||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on hedging activities | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | | | | |||||||||||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other | | | | |||||||||||||
Net gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership | ( | | — | |||||||||||||
Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||
Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $ | | | | | | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2020 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
95
Preferred | Simon (Managing | Limited | Noncontrolling | Total |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Units |
| General Partner) |
| Partners |
| Interests |
| Equity |
| ||||||
Series J preferred stock premium and amortization | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
Limited partner units exchanged to common units ( | | ( | — | |||||||||||||
Stock incentive program ( | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock incentive | | | ||||||||||||||
Redemption of limited partner units ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Long-term incentive performance units | | | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of unit equivalents and other ( | ( | | | ( | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on hedging activities | | | | |||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Changes in available-for-sale securities and other | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Net gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | | | | |||||||||||||
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership | | ( | — | |||||||||||||
Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||
Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $ | | | | ( | | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
96
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
1. Organization
Simon Property Group, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. REITs will generally not be liable for U.S. federal corporate income taxes as long as they distribute not less than 100% of their REIT taxable income. Simon Property Group, L.P. is our majority-owned Delaware partnership subsidiary that owns all of our real estate properties and other assets. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to Simon mean Simon Property Group, Inc. and references to the Operating Partnership mean Simon Property Group, L.P. References to we, us and our mean collectively Simon, the Operating Partnership and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by Simon and/or the Operating Partnership. Unless otherwise indicated, these notes to consolidated financial statements apply to both Simon and the Operating Partnership. According to the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement, the Operating Partnership is required to pay all expenses of Simon.
We own, develop and manage premier shopping, dining, entertainment and mixed-use destinations, which consist primarily of malls, Premium Outlets®, and The Mills®. As of December 31, 2021, we owned or held an interest in
We generate the majority of our lease income from retail, dining, entertainment and other tenants including consideration received from:
| ● | Fixed minimum lease consideration and fixed common area maintenance (CAM) reimbursements and, |
| ● | Variable lease consideration primarily based on tenants’ sales, as well as reimbursements for real estate taxes, utilities, marketing, and certain other items. |
Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.
We also grow by generating supplemental revenues from the following activities:
| ● | establishing our properties as leading market resource providers for retailers and other businesses and consumer-focused corporate alliances, including payment systems (such as handling fees relating to the sales of bank-issued prepaid cards), national marketing alliances, static and digital media initiatives, business development, sponsorship, and events, |
| ● | offering property operating services to our tenants and others, including waste handling and facility services, and the provision of energy services, |
| ● | selling or leasing land adjacent to our properties, commonly referred to as “outlots” or “outparcels,” and |
| ● | generating interest income on cash deposits and investments in loans, including those made to related entities. |
97
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
2. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all controlled subsidiaries, and all significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.
We consolidate properties that are wholly-owned or properties where we own less than 100% but we control. Control of a property is demonstrated by, among other factors, our ability to refinance debt and sell the property without the consent of any other partner or owner and the inability of any other partner or owner to replace us.
We also consolidate a variable interest entity, or VIE, when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether an entity has (1) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE considers all relationships between us and the VIE, including management agreements and other contractual arrangements. There have been no changes during 2021 in previous conclusions about whether an entity qualifies as a VIE or whether we are the primary beneficiary of any previously identified VIE. During the periods presented, we did not provide financial or other support to any identified VIE that we were not contractually obligated to provide.
Investments in partnerships and joint ventures represent our noncontrolling ownership interests. We account for these unconsolidated entities using the equity method of accounting. We initially record these investments at cost and we subsequently adjust for net equity in income or loss, which we allocate in accordance with the provisions of the applicable partnership or joint venture agreement, cash contributions and distributions, and foreign currency fluctuations, if applicable. The allocation provisions in the partnership or joint venture agreements are not always consistent with the legal ownership interests held by each general or limited partner or joint venture investee primarily due to partner preferences. We separately report investments in partnerships and joint ventures for which accumulated distributions have exceeded investments in and our share of net income of the partnerships and joint ventures within cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The net equity of certain partnerships and joint ventures is less than zero because of financing or operating distributions that are usually greater than net income, as net income includes non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.
As of December 31, 2021, we consolidated
Preferred distributions of the Operating Partnership are accrued at declaration and represent distributions on outstanding preferred units of partnership interests, or preferred units, and are included in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. We allocate net operating results of the Operating Partnership after preferred distributions to limited partners and to us based on the partners’ respective weighted average ownership interests in the Operating Partnership. Net operating results of the Operating Partnership attributable to limited partners are reflected in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.
98
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Our weighted average ownership interest in the Operating Partnership was as follows:
For the Year Ended |
| ||||||
December 31, |
| ||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Weighted average ownership interest |
| | % | | % | | % |
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, our ownership interest in the Operating Partnership was
Preferred unit requirements in the Operating Partnership’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income represent distributions on outstanding preferred units and are recorded when declared.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Investment Properties
Investment properties consist of the following as of December 31:
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||
Land | $ | | $ | | |||
Buildings and improvements |
| |
| | |||
Total land, buildings and improvements |
| |
| | |||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| |
| | |||
Investment properties at cost |
| |
| | |||
Less — accumulated depreciation |
| |
| | |||
Investment properties at cost, net | $ | | $ | | |||
Construction in progress included above | $ | | $ | | |||
We record investment properties at cost. Investment properties include costs of acquisitions; development, predevelopment, and construction (including allocable salaries and related benefits); tenant allowances and improvements; and interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction. We capitalize improvements and replacements from repair and maintenance when the repair and maintenance extends the useful life, increases capacity, or improves the efficiency of the asset. All other repair and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. We capitalize interest on projects during periods of construction until the projects are ready for their intended purpose based on interest rates in place during the construction period. The amount of interest capitalized during each year is as follows:
For the Year Ended |
| |||||||||
December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 | |||||
Capitalized interest | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
We record depreciation on buildings and improvements utilizing the straight-line method over an estimated original useful life, which is generally
We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis to identify and evaluate events or changes in circumstances which indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These
99
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
circumstances include, but are not limited to, declines in a property’s operational performance, such as declining cash flows, occupancy or total sales per square foot, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the related asset, and, if applicable, the remaining time to maturity of underlying financing arrangements. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization during the anticipated holding period plus its residual value, and, if applicable, on a probability weighted basis, is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to income the excess of carrying value of the property over our estimate of fair value.
We also review our investments, including investments in unconsolidated entities, to identify and evaluate whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine the fair value of the investment is less than its carrying value and such impairment is other-than-temporary. Our evaluation of changes in economic or operating conditions and whether an impairment is other-than-temporary may include developing estimates of fair value, forecasted cash flows or operating income before depreciation and amortization.
We estimate undiscounted cash flows and fair value using observable and unobservable data such as operating income before depreciation and amortization, hold periods, estimated capitalization and discount rates, or relevant market multiples, leasing prospects and local market information, expected probabilities of outcomes, if applicable, and whether an impairment is other-than-temporary. Changes in economic and operating conditions including, changes in the financial condition of our tenants and changes to our intent and ability to hold the related asset, that occur subsequent to our review of recoverability of investment property and other investments could impact the assumptions used in that assessment and could result in future charges to earnings if assumptions regarding those investments differ from actual results.
During the fourth quarter of 2020, we recorded an impairment charge of $
Purchase Accounting
We allocate the purchase price of asset acquisitions and any excess investment in unconsolidated entities to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component which may be derived from various observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions. Also, we may utilize third party valuation specialists. These components typically include buildings, land and intangibles related to in-place leases and we estimate:
| ● | the relative fair value of land and related improvements and buildings on an as-if-vacant basis, |
| ● | the market value of in-place leases based upon our best estimate of current market rents and amortize the resulting market rent adjustment into lease income, |
| ● | the value of costs to obtain tenants, including tenant allowances and improvements and leasing commissions, and |
| ● | the value of lease income and recovery of costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period, as if the space was vacant. |
The relative fair value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the acquired building or related improvements. We amortize tenant improvements, in-place lease assets and other lease-related intangibles over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We also estimate the value of other acquired intangible assets, if any, which are amortized over the remaining life of the underlying related intangibles.
100
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents generally consist of commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, Eurodollars, repurchase agreements, and money market deposits or securities. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk include our cash and cash equivalents and our trade accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents with institutions of high credit quality. However, at certain times, such cash and cash equivalents are in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Securities Investor Protection Corporation insurance limits. See Notes 4 and 8 for disclosures about non-cash investing and financing transactions.
Equity Instruments and Debt Securities
Equity instruments and debt securities consist primarily of equity instruments, our deferred compensation plan investments, the debt securities of our captive insurance subsidiary, and certain investments held to fund the debt service requirements of debt previously secured by investment properties. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had equity instruments with readily determinable fair values of $
Our deferred compensation plan equity instruments are valued based upon quoted market prices. The investments have a matching liability as the amounts are fully payable to the employees that earned the compensation. Changes in value of these securities and changes to the matching liability to employees are both recognized in earnings and, as a result, there is no impact to consolidated net income.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, we held debt securities of $
Our captive insurance subsidiary is required to maintain statutory minimum capital and surplus as well as maintain a minimum liquidity ratio. Therefore, our access to these securities may be limited.
Fair Value Measurements
Level 1 fair value inputs are quoted prices for identical items in active, liquid and visible markets such as stock exchanges. Level 2 fair value inputs are observable information for similar items in active or inactive markets, and appropriately consider counterparty creditworthiness in the valuations. Level 3 fair value inputs reflect our best estimate of inputs and assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation estimate. We have
101
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
The equity instruments with readily determinable fair values we held at December 31, 2021 and 2020 were primarily classified as having Level 1 and Level 2 fair value inputs. In addition, we had derivative instruments which were classified as having Level 2 inputs, which consist primarily of foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swap agreements with a gross asset balance of $
Note 7 includes a discussion of the fair value of debt measured using Level 2 inputs. Notes 3, 4, and 6 include discussions of the fair values recorded in purchase accounting using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs to our purchase accounting and impairment analyses include our estimations of fair value, net operating results of the property, capitalization rates and discount rates.
Gains or losses on Issuances of Stock by Equity Method Investees
When one of our equity method investees issues additional shares to third parties, our percentage ownership interest in the investee may decrease. In the event the issuance price per share is higher or lower than our average carrying amount per share, we recognize a noncash gain or loss on the issuance, when appropriate. This noncash gain or loss is recognized in our net income in the period the change of ownership interest occurs.
Use of Estimates
We prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.
Segment and Geographic Locations
Our primary business is the ownership, development, and management of premier shopping, dining, entertainment and mixed use real estate. We have aggregated our retail operations, including malls, Premium Outlets, The Mills, and our international investments into
Deferred Costs and Other Assets
Deferred costs and other assets include the following as of December 31:
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||
Deferred lease costs, net | $ | | $ | | |||
In-place lease intangibles, net |
| |
| | |||
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net |
| |
| | |||
Marketable securities of our captive insurance companies |
| |
| | |||
Goodwill |
| |
| | |||
Other marketable and non-marketable securities |
| |
| | |||
Prepaids, notes receivable and other assets, net |
| |
| | |||
$ | | $ | | ||||
102
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Deferred Lease Costs
Our deferred leasing costs consist primarily of initial direct costs and, prior to the adoption of ASC 842, capitalized salaries and related benefits, in connection with lease originations. We record amortization of deferred leasing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Details of these deferred costs as of December 31 are as follows:
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||
Deferred lease costs | $ | | $ | | |||
Accumulated amortization |
| ( |
| ( | |||
Deferred lease costs, net | $ | | $ | | |||
Amortization of deferred leasing costs is a component of depreciation and amortization expense. The accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income include amortization of deferred leasing costs as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
Amortization of deferred leasing costs | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Intangibles
The average remaining life of in-place lease intangibles is approximately
Details of intangible assets as of December 31 are as follows:
2021 |
| 2020 | |||||
In-place lease intangibles | $ | $ | |||||
Accumulated amortization | ( | ( | |||||
In-place lease intangibles, net | $ | $ | |||||
2021 | 2020 | ||||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles | $ | $ | |||||
Accumulated amortization | ( | ( | |||||
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net | $ | $ | |||||
103
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Estimated future amortization and the increasing (decreasing) effect on lease income for our above and below market leases as of December 31, 2021 are as follows:
Below | Above | Impact to | ||||||||
Market | Market | Lease | ||||||||
Leases | Leases | Income, Net | ||||||||
2022 | $ | | $ | ( | $ | ( |
| |||
2023 |
| |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
2024 |
| |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
2025 |
| |
| ( |
| | ||||
2026 |
| |
| ( |
| | ||||
Thereafter |
| |
| ( |
| | ||||
$ | | $ | ( | $ | | |||||
Derivative Financial Instruments
We record all derivatives on our consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have designated a derivative as a hedge and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. We may use a variety of derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to selectively manage or hedge a portion of the risks associated with our indebtedness and interest payments. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps. We require that hedging derivative instruments be highly effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. We formally designate any instrument that meets these hedging criteria as a hedge at the inception of the derivative contract. We have
As of December 31, 2021, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives related to managing our interest rate risk:
Number of | Notional | |||||
Interest Rate Derivative |
| Instruments |
| Amount |
| |
Interest Rate Swaps |
| | $ | |||
The carrying value of our interest rate swap agreements, at fair value, as of December 31, 2021 was a net asset balance of $
Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates primarily relates to our long-term debt obligations. We manage exposure to interest rate market risk through our risk management strategy by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of variable rate debt.
We may enter into treasury lock agreements as part of an anticipated debt issuance. Upon completion of the debt issuance, the fair value of these instruments is recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt agreement.
The unamortized gain on our treasury locks and terminated hedges recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income was $
104
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on financings of certain foreign operations. Our intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposers, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposers. We do not enter into either interest rate protection or foreign currency rate protection agreements for speculative purposes.
We are also exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on financial instruments which are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in Yen and Euro. We use currency forward contracts, cross currency swap contracts, and foreign currency denominated debt to manage our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates on certain Yen and Euro-denominated receivables and net investments. Currency forward contracts involve fixing the Yen:USD or Euro:USD exchange rate for delivery of a specified amount of foreign currency on a specified date. The currency forward contracts are typically cash settled in U.S. dollars for their fair value at or close to their settlement date.
We had the following Euro:USD forward contracts designated as net investment hedges at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in millions):
|
| Asset (Liability) Value as of | |||||||
December 31, |
| December 31, | |||||||
Notional Value | Maturity Date | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
€ | | March 24, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | March 24, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | March 24, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | March 24, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | May 14, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | May 14, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | May 14, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | May 14, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | May 14, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | May 14, 2021 | — | ( | |||||
€ | | May 14, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | December 20, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | December 20, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | December 20, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | July 15, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | July 15, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | July 15, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | September 17, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | September 17, 2021 | — |
| ( | ||||
€ | | March 15, 2022 | |
| — | ||||
€ | | September 15, 2022 | |
| — | ||||
€ | | September 15, 2022 | ( |
| — | ||||
€ | | September 15, 2022 | ( |
| — | ||||
€ | | December 16, 2022 | ( |
| — | ||||
Asset balances in the above table are included in deferred costs and other assets. Liability balances in the above table are included in other liabilities.
105
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
We have designated the currency forward contracts and cross-currency swaps as net investment hedges. Accordingly, we report the changes in fair value in other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in the value of these forward contracts are offset by changes in the underlying hedged Euro or Yen-denominated joint venture investment.
The total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to Simon’s derivative activities, including our share of other comprehensive income (loss) from unconsolidated entities, was ($
Noncontrolling Interests
Simon
Details of the carrying amount of our noncontrolling interests are as follows as of December 31:
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||||
Limited partners’ interests in the Operating Partnership | $ | | $ | | |||
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in properties, net |
| |
| | |||
Total noncontrolling interests reflected in equity | $ | | $ | | |||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (which includes nonredeemable and redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties, limited partners’ interests in the Operating Partnership, and preferred distributions payable by the Operating Partnership on its outstanding preferred units) is a component of consolidated net income. In addition, the individual components of other comprehensive income (loss) are presented in the aggregate for both controlling and noncontrolling interests, with the portion attributable to noncontrolling interests deducted from comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders.
The Operating Partnership
Our evaluation of the appropriateness of classifying the Operating Partnership’s common units of partnership interest, or units, held by Simon and the Operating Partnership's limited partners within permanent equity considered several significant factors. First, as a limited partnership, all decisions relating to the Operating Partnership’s operations and distributions are made by Simon, acting as the Operating Partnership’s sole general partner. The decisions of the general partner are made by Simon's Board of Directors or management. The Operating Partnership has no other governance structure. Secondly, the sole asset of Simon is its interest in the Operating Partnership. As a result, a share of common stock of Simon, or common stock, if owned by the Operating Partnership, is best characterized as being similar to a treasury share and thus not an asset of the Operating Partnership.
Limited partners of the Operating Partnership have the right under the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement to exchange their units for shares of common stock or cash, as selected by Simon as the sole general partner. Accordingly, we classify units held by limited partners in permanent equity because Simon may elect to issue shares of common stock to limited partners exercising their exchange rights rather than using cash. Under the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, the Operating Partnership is required to redeem units held by Simon only when Simon has repurchased shares of common stock. We classify units held by Simon in permanent equity because the decision to redeem those units would be made by Simon.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (which includes nonredeemable and redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties) is a component of consolidated net income.
106
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Simon
The total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to Simon’s currency translation adjustment was ($
The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following as of December 31:
2021 | 2020 | 2019 | Affected line item where net income is presented | |||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | $ | | $ | ( | $ | — | Gain (loss) on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net | |||||
( | | — | Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | |||||||||
$ | | $ | ( | — | ||||||||
Accumulated derivative gains (losses), net | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | ( |
| Interest expense | ||
— | — | ( | Loss on extinguishment of debt | |||||||||
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | |||
$ | | $ | | $ | ( | |||||||
The Operating Partnership
The total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the Operating Partnership’s currency translation adjustment was ($
The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following as of December 31:
2021 | 2020 | 2019 | Affected line item where net income is presented | |||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | $ | |
| $ | ( |
| $ | — | Gain (loss) on acquisition of controlling interest, sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net | |||
Accumulated derivative gains (losses), net | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | ( | Interest expense | |||
— | — | ( | Loss on extinguishment of debt | |||||||||
$ | | $ | | $ | ( | |||||||
107
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Revenue Recognition
We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We accrue fixed lease income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases when we believe substantially all lease income, including the related straight-line rent receivable, is probable of collection. Substantially all of our retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. We recognize this variable lease consideration only when each tenant’s sales exceed the applicable sales threshold. We amortize any tenant inducements as a reduction of lease income utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter.
We structure our leases to allow us to recover a significant portion of our property operating, real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotion expenses from our tenants. A substantial portion of our leases, other than those for anchor stores, require the tenant to reimburse us for a substantial portion of our operating expenses, including common area maintenance, or CAM, real estate taxes and insurance. Such property operating expenses typically include utility, insurance, security, janitorial, landscaping, food court and other administrative expenses. This significantly reduces our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation or otherwise. For substantially all of our leases in the U.S. mall portfolio, we receive a fixed payment from the tenant for the CAM component which is recognized as lease income on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease beginning with the adoption of ASC 842. When not reimbursed by the fixed CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant’s proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses and CAM capital expenditures for the property. We accrue all variable reimbursements from tenants for recoverable portions of all of these expenses as variable lease consideration in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. We recognize differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year. These differences were not material in any period presented. Our advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred. Provisions for credit losses that are not probable of collection are recognized as a reduction of lease income.
In April 2020, the FASB staff released guidance focused on treatment of concessions related to the effects of COVID-19 on the application of lease modification guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, “Leases.” The guidance provides a practical expedient to forgo the associated reassessments required by ASC 842 when changes to a lease result in similar or lower future consideration. We have elected to generally account for rent abatements as negative variable lease consideration in the period granted, or in the period we determine we expect to grant an abatement. Further abatements granted in the future will reduce lease income in the period we grant, or determine we expect to grant, an abatement.
We have agreed to deferral or abatement arrangements with a number of our tenants as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Discussions with our tenants are ongoing and may result in further rent deferrals, lease amendments, abatements and/or lease terminations, as we deem appropriate on a case-by-case basis based on each tenant's unique financial and operating situation. In addition, uncollected rent due from certain of our tenants is subject to ongoing litigation, the outcome of which may affect our ability to collect in full the associated outstanding receivable balances.
In connection with rent deferrals or other accruals of unpaid rent payments, if we determine that rent payments are probable of collection, we will continue to recognize lease income on a straight-line basis over the lease term along with associated tenant receivables. However, if we determine that such deferred rent payments or other accrued but unpaid rent payments are not probable of collection, lease income will be recorded on the cash basis, with the corresponding tenant receivable and deferred rent receivable balances charged as a direct write-off against lease income in the period of the change in our collectability determination. Additionally, our assessment of collectability incorporates information regarding a tenant’s financial condition that is obtained from available financial data, the expected outcome of contractual disputes and other matters, and our communications and negotiations with the tenant.
When a tenant seeks to reorganize its operations through bankruptcy proceedings, we assess the collectability of receivable balances. Our ongoing assessment incorporates, among other things, the timing of a tenant’s bankruptcy filing and our expectations of the assumptions by the tenant in bankruptcy proceedings of leases at the Company’s properties on substantially similar terms. Refer to note 9 for further disclosure of lease income.
108
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Management Fees and Other Revenues
Management fees and other revenues are generally received from our unconsolidated joint venture properties as well as third parties. Management fee revenue is earned based on a contractual percentage of joint venture property revenue. Development fee revenue is earned on a contractual percentage of hard costs to develop a property. Leasing fee revenue is earned on a contractual per square foot charge based on the square footage of current year leasing activity. We recognize revenue for these services provided when earned based on the performance criteria.
Revenues from insurance premiums charged to unconsolidated properties are recognized on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies. Insurance losses on these policies and our self-insurance for our consolidated properties are reflected in property operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and include estimates for losses incurred but not reported as well as losses pending settlement. Estimates for losses are based on evaluations by third-party actuaries and management’s estimates. Total insurance reserves for our insurance subsidiaries and other self-insurance programs as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 approximated $
Income Taxes
Simon and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have elected to be taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations relating to REIT qualification. In order to maintain this REIT status, the regulations require the entity to distribute at least 90% of REIT taxable income to its owners and meet certain other asset and income tests as well as other requirements. We intend to continue to adhere to these requirements and maintain Simon’s REIT status and that of the REIT subsidiaries. As REITs, these entities will generally not be liable for U.S. federal corporate income taxes as long as they distribute not less than 100% of their REIT taxable income. Thus, we made
We have also elected taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, status for some of our subsidiaries. This enables us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs and participate in activities that do not qualify as “rents from real property”. For these entities, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if we believe all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from the change in circumstances that causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset is included in income.
As a partnership, the allocated share of the Operating Partnership’s income or loss for each year is included in the income tax returns of the partners; accordingly, no accounting for income taxes is required in the accompanying consolidated financial statements other than as discussed above for our TRSs.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had net deferred tax liabilities of $
109
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
included in deferred costs and other assets and the deferred tax liability is included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
We are also subject to certain other taxes, including state and local taxes, franchise taxes, as well as income-based and withholding taxes on dividends from certain of our international investments, which are included in income and other taxes in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Our cash paid for taxes in each period was as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||||
Cash paid for taxes | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
Corporate Expenses
Home and regional office costs primarily include compensation and personnel related costs, travel, building and office costs, and other expenses for our corporate home office and regional offices. General and administrative expense primarily includes executive compensation, benefits and travel expenses as well as costs of being a public company, including certain legal costs, audit fees, regulatory fees, and certain other professional fees.
Simon Property Group Acquisition Holdings, Inc.
The Company sponsored, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a special purpose acquisition corporation, or SPAC, named Simon Property Group Acquisition Holdings, Inc. On February 18, 2021, the SPAC announced the pricing of its initial public offering, which was consummated on February 23, 2021, generating gross proceeds of $
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform,” which provides temporary optional expedients and exceptions to the US GAAP guidance on contract modifications and hedge accounting to ease the financial reporting burdens of the expected market transition from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates. Additional optional expedients, exceptions, and clarifications were created in ASU 2021-01. The guidance is effective upon issuance and generally can be applied to any contract modifications or existing and new hedging relationships through December 31, 2022. We elected the expedients in conjunction with transitioning certain debt instruments, as discussed in note 7, to alternative benchmark indexes. There was no impact on our consolidated financial statements at adoption.
4. Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions
We acquire interests in properties to generate both current income and long-term appreciation in value. We acquire interests in individual properties or portfolios of real estate companies that meet our investment criteria and sell properties which no longer meet our strategic criteria. Unless otherwise noted below, gains and losses on these transactions are included in gain on sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. We capitalize asset acquisition costs and expense costs related to business combinations, as well as disposition related costs as they are incurred. We
110
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
incurred a minimal amount of transaction expenses during 2021, 2020, and 2019. Refer to Note 6 for disclosure of unconsolidated joint venture acquisitions and dispositions.
Our acquisition and disposition activity for the periods presented are as follows:
2019 Acquisitions
On September 19, 2019, we acquired the remaining
2021 Dispositions
During 2021, we recorded net gains of $
2020 Dispositions
On October 1, 2020, we disposed of our interest in
2019 Dispositions
During 2019, we disposed of our interests in
5. Per Share and Per Unit Data
We determine basic earnings per share and basic earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock or units, as applicable, outstanding during the period and we consider any participating securities for purposes of applying the two-class method. We determine diluted earnings per share and diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock or units, as applicable, outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average number of shares or units, as applicable, that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into shares of common stock or units, as applicable, at the earliest date possible. The following tables set forth the components of basic and diluted earnings per share and basic and diluted earnings per unit.
Simon
For the Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| ||||||
Net Income attributable to Common Stockholders — Basic and Diluted |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding — Basic and Diluted |
| |
| |
| | ||||
For the year ended December 31, 2021, potentially dilutive securities include units that are exchangeable for common stock and long-term incentive performance units, or LTIP units, granted under our long-term incentive performance programs that are convertible into units and exchangeable for common stock. No securities had a material dilutive effect for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019. We have not adjusted net income attributable to
111
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
common stockholders and weighted average shares outstanding for income allocable to limited partners or units, respectively, as doing so would have no dilutive impact. We accrue dividends when they are declared. On February 7, 2022, Simon’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend for the first quarter of 2022 of $
The Operating Partnership
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Net Income attributable to Unitholders — Basic and Diluted |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Weighted Average Units Outstanding — Basic and Diluted |
| |
| |
| | ||||
For the year ended December 31, 2021, potentially dilutive securities include LTIP units. No securities had a material dilutive effect for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019. We accrue distributions when they are declared. On February 7, 2022, Simon’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash distribution for the first quarter of 2022 of $
The taxable nature of the dividends declared and Operating Partnership distributions declared for each of the years ended as indicated is summarized as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
Total dividends/distributions paid per common share/unit |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | | |
Percent taxable as ordinary income |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||||
Percent taxable as long-term capital gains |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||||
| | % |
| | % |
| | % | ||
6. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities and International Investments
Real Estate Joint Ventures and Investments
Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio of properties. As discussed in Note 2, we held joint venture interests in
Certain of our joint venture properties are subject to various rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, put and call rights, or other sale or marketing rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. We and our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which may result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings, or the use of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, to acquire the joint venture interest from our partner.
We may provide financing to joint ventures primarily in the form of interest bearing construction loans. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had construction loans and other advances to these related parties totaling $
Unconsolidated Entity Transactions
On July 1, 2021, we contributed to ABG all of our interests in both the Forever 21 and Brooks Brothers licensing ventures in exchange for additional interests in ABG. As a result, in the third quarter of 2021, we recognized a non-cash
112
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
pre-tax gain of $
During the fourth quarter of 2021, we disposed of our interest in an unconsolidated property resulting in a gain of $
On June 1, 2021, we and our partner, ABG, acquired the intellectual property of Eddie Bauer. Our non-controlling interest in the licensing venture is
During the second quarter of 2021, we sold our interest in
On December 29, 2020, we completed the acquisition of an
On December 7, 2020, we and a group of co-investors acquired certain assets and liabilities of J.C. Penney, a department store retailer, out of bankruptcy. Our non-controlling interest in the venture is
In the third quarter of 2020, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $
113
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
On February 19, 2020, we and a group of co-investors acquired certain assets and liabilities of Forever 21, a retailer of apparel and accessories, out of bankruptcy. The interests were acquired through
On October 16, 2019, we contributed approximately $
On September 19, 2019, as discussed in note 4, we acquired the remaining
During the first quarter of 2019, we disposed of our interests in a multi-family residential investment. Our share of the gross proceeds was $
In 2016, we and a group of co-investors acquired certain assets and liabilities of Aéropostale, a retailer of apparel and accessories, out of bankruptcy and subsequently renamed SPARC Group. The interests were acquired through
International Investments
We conduct our international operations primarily through joint venture arrangements and account for the majority of these international joint venture investments using the equity method of accounting.
European Investments
At December 31, 2021, we owned
During the year ended December 31, 2021, Klépierre elected to step-up the tax basis of certain assets in Italy, which triggered a one-time payment at a significantly reduced tax rate. As a result of the step-up in tax basis, a previously established deferred tax liability was reversed resulting in a non-cash gain, of which our share was $
114
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a net gain of $
We have an interest in a European investee that had interests in
On January 1, 2021 our European investee gained control of Ochtrup Designer Outlets as a result of the expiration of certain participating rights held by a venture partner. This resulted in the consolidation of the property, requiring a remeasurement of our previously held equity interest to fair value and the recognition of a non-cash gain of $
In addition, we have a
We also have minority interests in Value Retail PLC and affiliated entities, which own or have interests in and operate
Asian Joint Ventures
We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in Japan through a joint venture with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. We have a
Summary Financial Information
A summary of the combined balance sheets and statements of operations of our equity method investments and share of income from such investments, excluding our investments in Klépierre and TRG, as well as our other platform investments.
115
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| |||
2021 | 2020 |
| |||||
Assets: | |||||||
Investment properties, at cost | $ | | $ | | |||
Less - accumulated depreciation |
|
| |||||
| |
| | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
| |||||
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net |
|
| |||||
Right-of-use assets, net | | ||||||
Deferred costs and other assets |
|
| |||||
Total assets | $ | | $ | | |||
Liabilities and Partners’ Deficit: | |||||||
Mortgages | $ | $ | | ||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue |
|
| |||||
Lease liabilities | |||||||
Other liabilities |
|
| |||||
Total liabilities |
| |
| | |||
Preferred units |
| |
| | |||
Partners’ deficit |
| ( |
| ( | |||
Total liabilities and partners’ deficit | $ | | $ | | |||
Our Share of: | |||||||
Partners’ deficit | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||
Add: Excess Investment |
|
| | ||||
Our net Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity | $ | | $ | | |||
“Excess Investment” represents the unamortized difference of our investment over our share of the equity in the underlying net assets of the joint ventures or other investments acquired and has been determined to relate to the fair value of the investment properties, intangible assets, including goodwill, and debt premiums and discounts. We amortize excess investment over the life of the related depreciable components of assets acquired, typically no greater than
116
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
As of December 31, 2021, scheduled principal repayments on these joint venture properties’ mortgage indebtedness, assuming the obligations remain outstanding through the initial maturities, are as follows:
2022 | $ | | ||
2023 |
| | ||
2024 |
| | ||
2025 |
| | ||
2026 |
| | ||
Thereafter |
| | ||
Total principal maturities |
| |||
Debt issuance costs | ( | |||
Total mortgages | $ |
This debt becomes due in installments over various terms extending through 2035 with interest rates ranging from
117
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| ||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Lease income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Other income |
|
|
| |||||||
Total revenue |
| |
| |
| | ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: | ||||||||||
Property operating |
|
|
| |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
| |||||||
Real estate taxes |
|
|
| |||||||
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
| |||||||
Advertising and promotion |
|
|
| |||||||
Other |
|
|
| |||||||
Total operating expenses |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Operating Income Before Other Items |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Interest expense |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Gain on sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, net | | — | ||||||||
Net Income | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Third-Party Investors’ Share of Net Income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Our Share of Net Income | $ | $ | $ | |||||||
Amortization of Excess Investment |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Our Share of Gain on Sale or Disposal of Assets and Interests in Other Income in the Consolidated Financial Statements | ( | — | ( | |||||||
Our Share of Gain on Sale or Disposal of, or Recovery on, Assets and Interests in Unconsolidated Entities, net |
| ( |
| — |
| ( | ||||
Income from Unconsolidated Entities | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Our share of income from unconsolidated entities in the above table, aggregated with our share of results from our investments in Klépierre and TRG, as well as our other platform investments, is presented in income from unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Unless otherwise noted, our share of the gain on sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, net is reflected within gain on sale or disposal of, or recovery on, assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and impairment, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
118
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
7. Indebtedness
Our mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, excluding the impact of derivative instruments, consist of the following as of December 31:
2021 | 2020 |
| |||||
Fixed-Rate Debt: | |||||||
Mortgage notes, including $ | $ | | $ | | |||
Unsecured notes, including $ |
| |
| | |||
Commercial Paper (see below) | | | |||||
Total Fixed-Rate Debt |
| |
| | |||
Variable-Rate Debt: | |||||||
Mortgage notes, including $ |
| |
| | |||
Credit Facilities (see below), including $ |
| |
| | |||
Total Variable-Rate Debt |
| |
| | |||
Other Debt Obligations |
| |
| | |||
Total Mortgages and Unsecured Indebtedness | $ | | $ | | |||
General. Our unsecured debt agreements contain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants. If we were to fail to comply with these covenants, after the expiration of the applicable cure periods, the debt maturity could be accelerated or other remedies could be sought by the lender, including adjustments to the applicable interest rate. As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all covenants of our unsecured debt.
At December 31, 2021, our consolidated subsidiaries were the borrowers under
Unsecured Debt
At December 31, 2021, our unsecured debt consisted of $
119
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
The Credit Facility also included an additional single, delayed-draw $
In November 2021, we amended our Credit Facility to transition the borrowing rates from LIBOR to successor benchmark indexes. The Credit Facility can be increased in the form of additional commitments in an aggregate not to exceed $
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our election, at either (i) (x) for Term Benchmark Loans, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the applicable Local Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate, or the Adjusted TIBOR Rate, (y) for RFR Loans, if denominated in Sterling, SONIA plus a benchmark adjustment and if denominated in Dollars, Daily Simple SOFR plus a benchmark adjustment, or (z) for Daily SOFR Loans, the Adjusted Floating Overnight Daily SOFR Rate, in each case of clauses (x) through (z) above, plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between
In October 2021, we amended, restated, and extended the Supplemental Facility. The Supplemental Facility’s initial borrowing capacity of $
Borrowings under the Supplemental Facility bear interest, at our election, at either (i) (x) for Term Benchmark Loans, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the applicable Local Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate, or the Adjusted TIBOR Rate, (y) for RFR Loans, if denominated in Sterling, SONIA plus a benchmark adjustment and if denominated in Dollars, Daily Simple SOFR plus a benchmark adjustment, or (z) for Daily SOFR Loans, the Adjusted Floating Overnight Daily SOFR Rate, in each case of clauses (x) through (z) above, plus a margin determined by our corporate credit rating of between
On December 31, 2021, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of $
The Operating Partnership also has available a Commercial Paper program of $
120
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Euro commercial paper note markets and rank (either by themselves or as a result of the guarantee described above) pari passu with the Operating Partnership's other unsecured senior indebtedness. The Commercial Paper program is supported by the Credit Facilities, and if necessary or appropriate, we may make one or more draws under either of the Credit Facilities to pay amounts outstanding from time to time on the Commercial Paper program. On December 31, 2021, we had $
On July 9, 2020, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $
On July 10, 2020 the Operating Partnership repaid $
On July 22, 2020, the Operating Partnership completed the optional redemption at par of its $
On August 6, 2020 the Operating Partnership completed the optional redemption at par of its €
On January 21, 2021 the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $
On January 27, 2021 the Operating Partnership completed the planned optional redemption of its $
On March 19, 2021, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of €
On August 18, 2021, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $
In the third quarter of 2021, the Operating Partnership completed the optional redemption of all of its outstanding $
On December 14, 2021, the Operating Partnership drew $
On January 11, 2022, the Operating Partnership completed the issuance of the following senior unsecured notes: $
121
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Mortgage Debt
Total mortgage indebtedness was $
Debt Maturity and Other
Our scheduled principal repayments on indebtedness as of December 31, 2021, assuming the obligations remain outstanding through the initial maturities, are as follows:
2022 | $ | | (1) | |
2023 |
| | ||
2024 |
| | ||
2025 |
| | ||
2026 |
| | ||
Thereafter |
| |||
Total principal maturities |
| |||
Net unamortized debt premium |
| | ||
Net unamortized debt discount | ( | |||
Debt issuance costs, net |
| ( | ||
Other Debt Obligations | | |||
Total mortgages and unsecured indebtedness | $ |
(1) | Includes $ |
Our cash paid for interest in each period, net of any amounts capitalized, was as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Debt Issuance Costs
Our debt issuance costs consist primarily of financing fees we incurred in order to obtain long-term financing. We record amortization of debt issuance costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective loans or agreements. Details of those debt issuance costs as of December 31 are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
Debt issuance costs | $ | | $ | | ||
Accumulated amortization | ( | ( | ||||
Debt issuance costs, net | $ | | $ | | ||
We report amortization of debt issuance costs, amortization of premiums, and accretion of discounts as part of interest expense. We amortize debt premiums and discounts, which are included in mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, over the remaining terms of the related debt instruments. These debt premiums or discounts arise either at
122
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
the time of the debt issuance or as part of purchase accounting for the fair value of debt assumed in acquisitions. The accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income include amortization as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
Amortization of debt discounts/(premiums) | | | | ||||||
Fair Value of Debt
The carrying value of our variable-rate mortgages and other loans approximates their fair values. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate mortgages using cash flows discounted at current borrowing rates and other indebtedness using cash flows discounted at current market rates. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate unsecured notes using quoted market prices, or, if no quoted market prices are available, we use quoted market prices for securities with similar terms and maturities. The book value of our consolidated fixed-rate mortgages and unsecured indebtedness including commercial paper was $
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||||
Fair value of consolidated fixed rate mortgages and unsecured indebtedness (in millions) |
| $ | | $ | |
| ||
Weighted average discount rates assumed in calculation of fair value for fixed rate mortgages |
| | % |
| | % | ||
Weighted average discount rates assumed in calculation of fair value for unsecured indebtedness | | % | | % | ||||
8. Equity
Simon’s Board of Directors is authorized to reclassify excess common stock into
Holders of common stock are entitled to
Common Stock and Unit Issuances and Repurchases
In 2021, Simon issued
123
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
million. In 2020, Simon issued
On December 29, 2020, the Operating Partnership issued
On November 18, 2020, we issued
On February 13, 2017, Simon’s Board of Directors authorized a
Temporary Equity
Simon
Simon classifies as temporary equity those securities for which there is the possibility that Simon could be required to redeem the security for cash irrespective of the probability of such a possibility. As a result, Simon classifies
Limited Partners’ Preferred Interest in the Operating Partnership and Noncontrolling Redeemable Interests in Properties. The redemption features of the preferred units in the Operating Partnership contain provisions which could require the Operating Partnership to settle the redemption in cash. As a result, this series of preferred units in the Operating Partnership remains classified outside permanent equity.
The remaining noncontrolling interests in a property or portfolio of properties which are redeemable at the option of the holder or in circumstances that may be outside Simon’s control, are accounted for as temporary equity. The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is adjusted to the redemption amount assuming the instrument is redeemable at the balance sheet date. Changes in the redemption value of the underlying noncontrolling interest are recorded and presented within accumulated deficit in the consolidated statements of equity in the line issuance of unit equivalents and other. There were
124
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
following table summarizes the preferred units in the Operating Partnership and the amount of the noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties as of December 31.
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||
$ | | $ | | ||||
Other noncontrolling redeemable interests |
| |
| | |||
Limited partners’ preferred interest in the Operating Partnership and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties | $ | | $ | | |||
Refer to Note 3 for discussion of the noncontrolling redeemable interest related to the SPAC.
The Operating Partnership
The Operating Partnership classifies as temporary equity those securities for which there is the possibility that the Operating Partnership could be required to redeem the security for cash, irrespective of the probability of such a possibility. As a result, the Operating Partnership classifies
Noncontrolling Redeemable Interests in Properties Redeemable instruments, which typically represent the remaining noncontrolling interests in a property or portfolio of properties, and which are redeemable at the option of the holder or in circumstances that may be outside our control, are accounted for as temporary equity. The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is adjusted to the redemption amount assuming the instrument is redeemable at the balance sheet date. Changes in the redemption value of the underlying noncontrolling interest are recorded within equity and are presented in the consolidated statements of equity in the line issuance of unit equivalents and other. There are
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||
$ | | $ | | ||||
Other noncontrolling redeemable interests |
| |
| | |||
Total preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties | $ | | $ | | |||
Refer to Note 3 for discussion of the noncontrolling redeemable interest related to the SPAC.
125
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Permanent Equity
Simon
Preferred Stock. Dividends on all series of preferred stock are calculated based upon the preferred stock’s preferred return multiplied by the preferred stock’s corresponding liquidation value. The Operating Partnership pays preferred distributions to Simon equal to the dividends Simon pays on the preferred stock issued.
Series J 83/8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 83/8% per share. Simon can redeem this series, in whole or in part, on or after October 15, 2027 at a redemption price of $
The Operating Partnership
Series J 83/8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units. Distributions accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 83/8% per unit on the Series J 83/8% preferred units, or Series J preferred units. Simon owns all of the Series J preferred units which have the same economic rights and preferences of an outstanding series of Simon preferred stock. The Operating Partnership can redeem this series, in whole or in part, when Simon can redeem the related preferred stock, on and after October 15, 2027 at a redemption price of $
Other Equity Activity
The Simon Property Group, L.P. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan. This plan, or the 2019 Plan, provides for the grant of equity-based awards with respect to the equity of Simon in the form of incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock grants and performance-based awards. Options may be granted which are qualified as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and options which are not so qualified. An aggregate of
The 2019 Plan is administered by the Compensation and Human Capital Committees. The Compensation and Human Capital Committees determines which eligible individuals may participate and the type, extent and terms of the awards to be granted to them. In addition, the Compensation and Human Capital Committees interprets the 2019 Plan and makes all other determinations deemed advisable for its administration. Options granted to employees become exercisable over the period determined by the Compensation and Human Capital Committees. The exercise price of an employee option may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Employee options generally vest over a
126
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
Directors who are not also our employees or employees of our affiliates are eligible to receive awards under the 2019 plan. Each independent director receives an annual cash retainer of $
Restricted stock awards vest in full after
Stock Based Compensation
Our long-term incentive compensation awards under our stock based compensation plans primarily take the form of LTIP units, restricted stock grants and restricted stock units. These awards are either market or performance-based and are based on various individual, corporate and business unit performance measures as further described below. The expense related to these programs, net of amounts capitalized, is included within home and regional office costs and general and administrative costs in the accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive income. In the first quarter of 2021, the Compensation and Human Capital Committees established and made awards under a 2021 Long-Term Incentive Program, or 2021 LTI Program. Awards under the 2021 LTI Program took the form of LTIP units and restricted stock units, or RSUs, as further discussed below.
LTIP Programs. The Compensation and Human Capital Committees has approved long-term, performance based incentive compensation programs, or the LTIP programs, for certain senior employees. Awards under the LTIP programs take the form of LTIP units, a form of limited partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership, which are subject to the participant maintaining employment with us through certain dates and other conditions as described in the applicable award agreements. Awarded LTIP units not earned in accordance with the conditions set forth in the applicable award agreements are forfeited. Earned and fully vested LTIP units are equivalent to units of the Operating Partnership. During the performance period, participants are entitled to receive distributions on the LTIP units awarded to them equal to
In 2018, the Compensation and Human Capital Committees established and granted awards under a redesigned LTIP program, or the 2018 LTIP program. Awards under the 2018 LTIP program were granted in
The grant date fair value of the portion of the LTIP units based on achieving the target FFO performance criteria is $
In 2021 and 2019, the Compensation and Human Capital Committees established and granted awards under a redesigned LTIP program, or the 2021 LTIP program and the 2019 LTIP program, respectively. Awards under these programs will be considered earned if, and only to the extent to which, the respective performance conditions (based on Funds From Operations, or FFO, per share, and Objective Criteria Goals) and market conditions (based on Relative or
127
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
absolute TSR performance), as defined in the applicable award agreements, are achieved during the applicable
The grant date fair values of any LTIP units for market-based awards are estimated using a Monte Carlo model, and the resulting fixed expense is recorded regardless of whether the market condition criteria are achieved if the required service is delivered. The grant date fair values of the market-based awards are being amortized into expense over the period from the grant date to the date at which the awards, if earned, would become vested. The expense of the performance-based award is recorded over the period from the grant date to the date at which the awards, if earned, would become vested, based on our assessment as to whether it is probable that the performance criteria will be achieved during the applicable performance periods.
The Compensation and Human Capital Committees approved LTIP unit grants as shown in the table below. The extent to which LTIP units were earned, and the aggregate grant date fair value, are as follows:
LTIP Program |
| LTIP Units Earned |
| Grant Date Fair Value of TSR Award |
| Grant Date Target Value of Performance-Based Awards |
2018 LTIP program - Tranche A |
| |
| $ |
| $ |
2018 LTIP program - Tranche B |
| - |
| $ |
| $ |
2019 LTIP program | To be determined in 2022 |
| $ |
| $ | |
2021 LTIP program | To be determined in 2024 |
| $ |
| $ |
We recorded compensation expense, net of capitalization and forfeitures, related to LTIP programs of approximately $
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. The 2019 plan also provides for shares of restricted stock to be granted to certain employees at no cost to those employees, subject to achievement of individual performance and certain financial and return-based performance measures established by the Compensation and Human Capital Committees related to the most recent year’s performance. Once granted, the shares of restricted stock then vest annually over a
During the first quarter of 2021, as part of the 2021 LTI Program the Compensation and Human Capital Committees established a grant of
During 2020, the Compensation and Human Capital Committees established a one-time grant of
128
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024. The grant date fair value of the awards of $
Information regarding restricted stock awards is summarized in the following table for each of the years presented:
For the Year Ended |
| |||||||||
December 31, |
| |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
Shares of restricted stock awarded during the year, net of forfeitures |
| |
|
| | |||||
Weighted average fair value of shares granted during the year | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Annual amortization | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
We recorded compensation expense, net of capitalization, related to restricted stock for employees and non-employee directors of approximately $
We also maintain a tax-qualified retirement 401(k) savings plan and offer no other post-retirement or post-employment benefits to our employees.
Exchange Rights
Simon
Limited partners in the Operating Partnership have the right to exchange all or any portion of their units for shares of common stock on a
The Operating Partnership
Limited partners have the right under the partnership agreement to exchange all or any portion of their units for shares of Simon common stock on a
9. Lease Income
Fixed lease income under our operating leases includes fixed minimum lease consideration and fixed CAM reimbursements recorded on a straight-line basis. Variable lease income includes consideration based on sales, as well
129
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
as reimbursements for real estate taxes, utilities, marketing, and certain other items including negative variable lease income as discussed in Note 3.
For the Year Ended | |||||||||
December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
Fixed lease income | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
Variable lease income | | | | ||||||
Total lease income | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets includes straight-line receivables of $
Minimum fixed lease consideration under non-cancelable tenant operating leases for each of the next five years and thereafter, excluding variable lease consideration and amounts deferred in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, which with respect to deferrals are expected to be collected primarily in 2022 and 2023, as of December 31, 2021, is as follows:
2022 |
| $ | |
2023 |
| | |
2024 |
| | |
2024 |
| | |
2025 |
| | |
Thereafter |
| | |
$ | |
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are involved from time-to-time in various legal and regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to, commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions such as acquisitions and divestitures. We believe that current proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
During the first quarter of 2019, we settled a lawsuit with our former insurance broker, Aon Risk Services Central Inc., related to the significant flood damage sustained at Opry Mills in May 2010. In accordance with a previous agreement with the prior co-investor in Opry Mills, a portion of the settlement was remitted to the co-investor. Our share of the settlement was approximately $
Lease Commitments
As of December 31, 2021, a total of
130
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
classified as operating leases. We incurred ground lease expense and office lease expense, which are included in other expense and home office and regional expense, respectively, as follows:
For the Year Ended | |||||||||
December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Operating Lease Cost | |||||||||
Fixed lease cost | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
Variable lease cost | | | | ||||||
Sublease income |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | |||
Total operating lease cost | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
For the Year Ended | |||||||||
December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||||
Other Information | |||||||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | |||||||||
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases | |||||||||
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases | |||||||||
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases for years ending December 31, excluding applicable extension options and renewal options unless reasonably certain of exercise and any sublease income, are as follows:
2022 |
| $ | |
2023 |
| | |
2024 |
| | |
2025 |
| | |
2026 |
| | |
Thereafter |
| | |
$ | | ||
Impact of discounting | ( | ||
Operating lease liabilities | $ | |
Insurance
We maintain insurance coverage with third-party carriers who provide a portion of the coverage for specific layers of potential losses, including commercial general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties in the United States as well as cyber coverage. The initial portion of coverage not provided by third-party carriers may be insured through our wholly-owned captive insurance company, or other financial arrangements controlled by us. If required, a third-party carrier has, in turn, agreed to provide evidence of coverage for this layer of losses under the terms and conditions of the carrier’s insurance policy with us. A similar insurance policy written either through our captive insurance company or other financial arrangements controlled by us also provides initial coverage for property insurance and certain windstorm risks.
131
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
We currently maintain insurance coverage against acts of terrorism on all of our properties in the United States on an “all risk” basis in the amount of up to $
Hurricane Impacts
During the third quarter of 2017,
During the third quarter of 2020,
During the third quarter of 2020,
Guarantees of Indebtedness
Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by the joint venture property, which is non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Operating Partnership guaranteed joint venture related mortgage indebtedness of $
Concentration of Credit Risk
Our U.S. Malls, Premium Outlets, and The Mills rely upon anchor tenants to attract customers; however, anchors do not contribute materially to our financial results as many anchors own their spaces. All material operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant accounts for
COVID-19
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel strain of coronavirus, or COVID-19, a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a material negative impact on economic and market conditions around the world, and, notwithstanding the fact that vaccines are being administered in the United States and elsewhere, the pandemic continues to adversely impact economic activity in retail real estate. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and governments and other authorities, including where we own or hold interests in properties, have at times imposed measures intended to control its spread,
132
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
including restrictions on freedom of movement, group gatherings and business operations such as travel bans, border closings, business closures, quarantines, stay-at-home, shelter-in-place orders, density limitations and social distancing measures. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and these measures, the Company has experienced and may continue to experience material impacts including changes in the ability to recognize revenue due to changes in our assessment of the probability of collection of lease income and asset impairment charges as a result of changing cash flows generated by our properties and investments.
11. Related Party Transactions
Transactions with Affiliates
Our management company provides office space and legal, human resource administration, property specific financing and other support services to Melvin Simon Associates, Inc., or MSA, a related party, for which we received a fee of $
Transactions with Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
As described in Note 2, our management company provides management, insurance, and other services to certain unconsolidated joint ventures. Amounts received for such services were $
We have investments in retailers including J.C. Penney and SPARC Group, and these retailers are lessees at certain of our operating properties. Lease income from the date of our investments in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income related to these retailers was $
133
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except share, per share, unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)
12. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly 2021 and 2020 data is summarized in the table below. Quarterly amounts may not sum to annual amounts due to rounding.
| First |
| Second |
| Third |
| Fourth |
| |||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter |
| |||||||||
2021 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Operating income before other items |
| |
| |
| |
| | |||||
Consolidated net income |
| |
| |
| |
| | |||||
Simon Property Group, Inc. | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Net income per share — Basic and Diluted | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — Basic and Diluted |
| |
| |
| |
| | |||||
Simon Property Group, L.P. | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to unitholders | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Net income per unit — Basic and Diluted | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Weighted average units outstanding — Basic and Diluted | | | | | |||||||||
2020 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue (1) | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Operating income before other items |
| |
| |
| |
| | |||||
Consolidated net income |
| |
| |
| |
| | |||||
Simon Property Group, Inc. | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Net income per share — Basic and Diluted | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — Basic and Diluted |
|
| |
| |
| | ||||||
Simon Property Group, L.P. | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to unitholders | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Net income per unit — Basic and Diluted | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Weighted average units outstanding — Basic and Diluted | | | | | |||||||||
134
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Simon
Management's Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Simon maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Simon’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Our management, with the participation of Simon’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of Simon’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. Based on that evaluation, Simon’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, Simon’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Simon is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, Simon’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by Simon’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
| ● | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and disposition of assets; |
| ● | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
| ● | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We assessed the effectiveness of Simon’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that assessment and criteria, we believe that, as of December 31, 2021, Simon’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The audit report of Ernst Young LLP on their assessment of Simon's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 is set forth within Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in Simon's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Simon's internal control over financial reporting.
135
The Operating Partnership
Management's Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Operating Partnership maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including Simon’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Our management, with the participation of Simon’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. Based on that evaluation, Simon’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Operating Partnership is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, Simon’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by Simon’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
| ● | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and disposition of assets; |
| ● | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
| ● | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We assessed the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that assessment and criteria, we believe that, as of December 31, 2021, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The audit report of Ernst Young LLP on their assessment of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 is set forth within Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
136
Item 9B. Other Information
During the fourth quarter of the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Audit Committee of Simon’s Board of Directors approved certain audit, audit-related and non-audit tax compliance and tax consulting services to be provided by Ernst Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Exchange Act as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not Applicable.
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for Simon’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A and the information included under the caption Information about our Executive Officers in Part I hereof.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for Simon’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for Simon’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for Simon’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for Simon’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A.
The Audit Committee of Simon's Board of Directors pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by Ernst Young LLP (PCAOB :
2021 |
| 2020 | ||||
Audit Fees (1) | $ | 5,444,000 | $ | 4,707,000 | ||
Audit Related Fees (2) |
| 4,890,000 |
| 5,068,000 | ||
Tax Fees (3) |
| 276,000 |
| 359,000 | ||
All Other Fees |
| — |
| — | ||
(1) | Audit Fees include fees for the audits of the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and quarterly reviews for Simon and the Operating Partnership and services associated with the related SEC registration statements, periodic reports, and other documents issued in connection with securities offerings, and varies based on our capital markets and transaction activity. |
137
(2) | Audit-Related Fees include audits of individual or portfolios of properties and schedules to comply with lender, joint venture partner or contract requirements and due diligence services for our managed consolidated and joint venture entities and our consolidated non-managed entities. Our share of these Audit-Related Fees was approximately 57% and 60% for the years ended 2021 and 2020, respectively. |
(3) | Tax Fees include fees for international and other tax consulting services, tax due diligence and tax return compliance services associated with the tax returns for certain managed joint ventures as well as other miscellaneous tax compliance services. Our share of these Tax Fees was approximately 71% and 81% for 2021 and 2020, respectively. |
138
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
139
Exhibits | |||
|---|---|---|---|
10.1 | |||
10.2 | |||
10.3 | |||
10.4 | |||
10.5* | |||
10.6* | |||
10.7* | |||
10.8* | |||
10.9* | |||
10.10* | |||
10.11* | |||
10.12* | |||
10.13* | |||
10.14* | |||
10.15* | |||
10.16* | |||
141
Exhibits | |||
|---|---|---|---|
10.17* | |||
10.18* | |||
10.19* | |||
10.20* | |||
10.21* | |||
10.22* | |||
10.23* | |||
10.24* | |||
10.25* | |||
10.26* | |||
10.27* | |||
10.28* | |||
10.29* | |||
10.30* | |||
10.31* | |||
10.32* | |||
10.33* | |||
10.34 | |||
142
Exhibits | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
10.35* | ||||
10.36* | ||||
10.37* | ||||
10.38* | ||||
10.39 | ||||
10.40 | ||||
10.41 | ||||
10.42* | ||||
10.43* | ||||
10.44* | ||||
10.45* | ||||
10.46* | ||||
10.47 | ||||
10.48* | ||||
10.49* | ||||
10.50* | ||||
143
Exhibits | |||
|---|---|---|---|
10.51 | |||
10.52 | |||
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries of Simon Property Group Inc. and Simon Property Group, L.P. | ||
23.1 | |||
23.2 | |||
31.1 | |||
31.2 | |||
31.3 | |||
31.4 | |||
32.1 | |||
32.2 | |||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. | ||
101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | ||
101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | ||
101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | ||
101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | ||
101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | ||
104 | Cover Page Interactive File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | ||
(a) Does not include supplemental indentures that authorize the issuance of debt securities series, none of which exceeds 10% of the total assets of Simon Property Group, L.P. on a consolidated basis. Simon Property Group, L.P. agrees to file copies of any such supplemental indentures upon the request of the Commission.
* Represents a management contract, or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Regulation S-K.
144
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. | ||
By | /s/ DAVID SIMON | |
David Simon | ||
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief | ||
Executive Officer and President | ||
Date: February 24, 2022 | ||
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P. | ||
/s/ DAVID SIMON | ||
David Simon | ||
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner | ||
Date: February 24, 2022 | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Simon Property Group, Inc., for itself and in its capacity as General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P., and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Capacity | Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ DAVID SIMON | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and President | February 24, 2022 | ||
David Simon | ||||
/s/ HERBERT SIMON | Chairman Emeritus and Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Herbert Simon | ||||
/s/ RICHARD S. SOKOLOV | Vice Chairman and Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Richard S. Sokolov | ||||
/s/ LARRY C. GLASSCOCK | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Larry C. Glasscock | ||||
/s/ REUBEN S. LEIBOWITZ | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Reuben S. Leibowitz | ||||
/s/ J. ALBERT SMITH, JR. | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
J. Albert Smith, Jr. | ||||
/s/ KAREN N. HORN | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Karen N. Horn | ||||
/s/ ALLAN HUBBARD | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Allan Hubbard | ||||
/s/ DANIEL C. SMITH | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Daniel C. Smith | ||||
145
Signature | Capacity | Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ GARY M. RODKIN | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Gary M. Rodkin | ||||
/s/ GLYN F. AEPPEL | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Glyn F. Aeppel | ||||
/s/ STEFAN M. SELIG | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Stefan M. Selig | ||||
/s/ MARTA R. STEWART | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Marta R. Stewart | ||||
/s/ PEGGY F. ROE | Director | February 24, 2022 | ||
Peggy F. Roe | ||||
/s/ BRIAN J. MCDADE | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Treasurer | February 24, 2022 | ||
Brian J. McDade | ||||
/s/ ADAM J. REUILLE | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | February 24, 2022 | ||
Adam J. Reuille | ||||
146
SCHEDULE III
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost Capitalized |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subsequent to | Gross Amounts At Which | Date of |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost (3) | Acquisition (3) | Carried At Close of Period | Construction |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and | Buildings and | Buildings and | Accumulated | or |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Location |
| Encumbrances (6) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (1) |
| Depreciation (2) |
| Acquisition |
| |||||||||
Malls | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Barton Creek Square | Austin, TX | $ | — | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | |
| 1981 | |||||||||||
Battlefield Mall | Springfield, MO |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1970 | |||||||||||
Bay Park Square | Green Bay, WI |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1980 | |||||||||||
Brea Mall | Brea (Los Angeles), CA |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1998 | (4) | ||||||||||
Broadway Square | Tyler, TX |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1994 | (4) | ||||||||||
Burlington Mall | Burlington (Boston), MA |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1998 | (4) | ||||||||||
Castleton Square | Indianapolis, IN |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1972 | |||||||||||
Cielo Vista Mall | El Paso, TX |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1974 | |||||||||||
College Mall | Bloomington, IN |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1965 | |||||||||||
Columbia Center | Kennewick, WA |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1987 | |||||||||||
Copley Place | Boston, MA |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| 2002 | (4) | ||||||||||
Coral Square | Coral Springs (Miami), FL |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1984 | |||||||||||
Cordova Mall | Pensacola, FL |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1998 | (4) | ||||||||||
Domain, The | Austin, TX |
| |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2005 | |||||||||||
Empire Mall | Sioux Falls, SD |
| |
| |
| |
| — |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| 1998 | (5) | |||||||||||
Fashion Mall at Keystone, The | Indianapolis, IN |
| — |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1997 | (4) | |||||||||
Firewheel Town Center | Garland (Dallas), TX |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2004 | |||||||||||
Forum Shops at Caesars, The | Las Vegas, NV |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| 1992 | |||||||||||
Greenwood Park Mall | Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1979 | |||||||||||
Haywood Mall | Greenville, SC |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1998 | (4) | ||||||||||
King of Prussia | King of Prussia (Philadelphia), PA |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2003 | (5) | ||||||||||
La Plaza Mall (13) | McAllen, TX |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1976 | |||||||||||
Lakeline Mall | Cedar Park (Austin), TX |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1995 | |||||||||||
Lenox Square | Atlanta, GA |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1998 | (4) | ||||||||||
Livingston Mall | Livingston (New York), NJ | — | | | — | | | | | | 1998 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mall of Georgia | Buford (Atlanta), GA | — | | | — | | | | | | 1999 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
McCain Mall | N. Little Rock, AR | — |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1973 | ||||||||||||
Menlo Park Mall | Edison (New York), NJ |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1997 | (4) | ||||||||||
Midland Park Mall | Midland, TX |
| — |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 1980 | |||||||||||||
Miller Hill Mall | Duluth, MN |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1973 | ||||
North East Mall | Hurst (Dallas), TX |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1971 | ||||
Ocean County Mall | Toms River (New York), NJ |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | |||
Orland Square | Orland Park (Chicago), IL |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1997 | (4) | |||
147
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost Capitalized |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subsequent to | Gross Amounts At Which | Date of |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost (3) | Acquisition (3) | Carried At Close of Period | Construction |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and | Buildings and | Buildings and | Accumulated | or |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Location |
| Encumbrances (6) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (1) |
| Depreciation (2) |
| Acquisition |
| |||||||||
Oxford Valley Mall | Langhorne (Philadelphia), PA |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2003 | (4) | |||
Penn Square Mall | Oklahoma City, OK |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2002 | (4) | |||
Pheasant Lane Mall | Nashua, NH |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (5) | |||
Phipps Plaza | Atlanta, GA |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | |||
Plaza Carolina | Carolina (San Juan), PR |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | |||
Prien Lake Mall | Lake Charles, LA |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1972 | ||||
Rockaway Townsquare | Rockaway (New York), NJ |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | |||
Roosevelt Field | Garden City (New York), NY |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | |||
Ross Park Mall | Pittsburgh, PA | $ | — |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| 1986 | |||
Santa Rosa Plaza | Santa Rosa, CA |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | |||
Shops at Chestnut Hill, The | Chestnut Hill (Boston), MA |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2002 | (5) | |||
Shops at Nanuet, The | Nanuet, NY |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2013 | ||||
Shops at Riverside, The | Hackensack (New York), NJ |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2007 | (4) (5) | |||
South Hills Village | Pittsburgh, PA |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1997 | (4) | |||
South Shore Plaza | Braintree (Boston), MA |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | |||
Southdale Mall | Edina (Minneapolis), MN | — |
| | |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2007 | (4) (5) | |||||||||||||
SouthPark | Charlotte, NC |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2002 | (4) | |||
St. Charles Towne Center | Waldorf (Washington, DC), MD |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1990 | ||||
Stanford Shopping Center | Palo Alto (San Jose), CA | — | — | | — | | — | | | | 2003 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Summit Mall | Akron, OH | | |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1965 | |||||||||||||
Tacoma Mall | Tacoma (Seattle), WA | — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1987 | ||||||||||||
Tippecanoe Mall | Lafayette, IN |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1973 | |||
Town Center at Boca Raton | Boca Raton (Miami), FL |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | ||
Towne East Square | Wichita, KS |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1975 | |||
Treasure Coast Square | Jensen Beach, FL |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1987 | |||
Tyrone Square | St. Petersburg (Tampa), FL |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1972 | |||
University Park Mall | Mishawaka, IN |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1996 | (4) | ||
Walt Whitman Shops | Huntington Station (New York), NY |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1998 | (4) | ||
White Oaks Mall | Springfield, IL |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1977 | |||
Wolfchase Galleria | Memphis, TN |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2002 | (4) | ||
Woodland Hills Mall | Tulsa, OK |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (5) | ||
148
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost Capitalized |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subsequent to | Gross Amounts At Which | Date of |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost (3) | Acquisition (3) | Carried At Close of Period | Construction |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and | Buildings and | Buildings and | Accumulated | or |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Location |
| Encumbrances (6) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (1) |
| Depreciation (2) |
| Acquisition |
| |||||||||
Premium Outlets |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Albertville Premium Outlets | Albertville (Minneapolis), MN |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Allen Premium Outlets | Allen (Dallas), TX |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | |||||||||||
Aurora Farms Premium Outlets | Aurora (Cleveland), OH |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | |||||||||||
Birch Run Premium Outlets | Birch Run (Detroit), MI |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2010 | (4) | ||
Camarillo Premium Outlets | Camarillo (Los Angeles), CA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Carlsbad Premium Outlets | Carlsbad (San Diego), CA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Carolina Premium Outlets | Smithfield (Raleigh), NC |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Chicago Premium Outlets | Aurora (Chicago), IL |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Cincinnati Premium Outlets | Monroe (Cincinnati), OH |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2008 | |||
Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets | Clinton, CT |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Denver Premium Outlets | Thornton (Denver), CO | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
Desert Hills Premium Outlets | Cabazon (Palm Springs), CA | — | | | — | | | | | | 2004 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ellenton Premium Outlets | Ellenton (Tampa), FL |
| |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2010 | (4) | ||||||||||||
Folsom Premium Outlets | Folsom (Sacramento), CA |
| — |
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | |||||
Gilroy Premium Outlets | Gilroy (San Jose), CA |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2004 | (4) | ||||||||||||
Grand Prairie Premium Outlets | Grand Prairie (Dallas), TX |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2012 | |||||
Grove City Premium Outlets | Grove City (Pittsburgh), PA |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2010 | (4) | ||||
Gulfport Premium Outlets | Gulfport, MS | $ | |
| $ | — |
| $ | |
| $ | — |
| $ | |
| $ | — |
| $ | |
| $ | | $ | | 2010 | (4) | ||||
Hagerstown Premium Outlets | Hagerstown (Baltimore/Washington, DC), MD | |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2010 | (4) | |||||||||||||
Houston Premium Outlets | Cypress (Houston), TX | — | | | — | | | | | | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||
149
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost Capitalized |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subsequent to | Gross Amounts At Which | Date of |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost (3) | Acquisition (3) | Carried At Close of Period | Construction |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and | Buildings and | Buildings and | Accumulated | or |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Location |
| Encumbrances (6) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (1) |
| Depreciation (2) |
| Acquisition |
| |||||||||
Indiana Premium Outlets | Edinburgh (Indianapolis), IN | — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2004 | (4) | |||||||||||||
Jackson Premium Outlets | Jackson (New York), NJ | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2004 | (4) | |||||||||||||
Jersey Shore Premium Outlets | Tinton Falls (New York), NJ |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2007 | |||||
Johnson Creek Premium Outlets | Johnson Creek, WI |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Kittery Premium Outlets | Kittery, ME |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Las Americas Premium Outlets | San Diego, CA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2007 | (4) | ||||
Las Vegas North Premium Outlets | Las Vegas, NV |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Las Vegas South Premium Outlets | Las Vegas, NV |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Lee Premium Outlets | Lee, MA |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2010 | (4) | ||||
Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets | Leesburg (Washington, DC), VA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets | Michigan City (Chicago, IL), IN |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Merrimack Premium Outlets | Merrimack, NH |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2012 | |||||
Napa Premium Outlets | Napa, CA |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | |||||||||||
North Bend Premium Outlets | North Bend (Seattle), WA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
North Georgia Premium Outlets | Dawsonville (Atlanta), GA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Orlando International Premium Outlets | Orlando, FL |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2010 | (4) | ||||
Orlando Vineland Premium Outlets | Orlando, FL |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Petaluma Village Premium Outlets | Petaluma (San Francisco), CA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||
Philadelphia Premium Outlets | Limerick (Philadelphia), PA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2006 | |||||
Phoenix Premium Outlets | Chandler (Phoenix), AZ |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| | | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Pismo Beach Premium Outlets | Pismo Beach, CA |
| |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2010 | (4) | ||||||||||||
Pleasant Prairie Premium Outlets | Pleasant Prairie (Chicago, IL/Milwaukee), WI |
| |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2010 | (4) | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Premium Outlets | Barceloneta, PR |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2010 | (4) | ||
Queenstown Premium Outlets | Queenstown (Baltimore), MD |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2010 | (4) | ||
150
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost Capitalized |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subsequent to | Gross Amounts At Which | Date of |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost (3) | Acquisition (3) | Carried At Close of Period | Construction |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and | Buildings and | Buildings and | Accumulated | or |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Location |
| Encumbrances (6) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (1) |
| Depreciation (2) |
| Acquisition |
| |||||||||
Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets | Mercedes (McAllen), TX |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2005 | |||
Round Rock Premium Outlets | Round Rock (Austin), TX |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2005 | |||
San Francisco Premium Outlets | Livermore (San Francisco), CA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2012 | |||
San Marcos Premium Outlets | San Marcos (Austin/San Antonio), TX |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2010 | (4) | ||
Seattle Premium Outlets | Tulalip (Seattle), WA | — |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||||||||||
St. Augustine Premium Outlets | St. Augustine (Jacksonville), FL | — | | | | | | | | | 2004 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa Premium Outlets | Lutz (Tampa), FL |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2015 | |||||||||||
The Crossings Premium Outlets | Tannersville, PA |
| $ | — |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | — |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| 2004 | (4) | |
Tucson Premium Outlets | Marana (Tucson), AZ | — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Vacaville Premium Outlets | Vacaville, CA |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Waikele Premium Outlets | Waipahu (Honolulu), HI |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Waterloo Premium Outlets | Waterloo, NY |
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| — |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2004 | (4) | ||
Williamsburg Premium Outlets | Williamsburg, VA | |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2010 | (4) | ||||||||||||
Woodburn Premium Outlets | Woodburn (Portland), OR |
| — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2013 | (4) | ||||||||||
Woodbury Common Premium Outlets | Central Valley (New York), NY | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | (4) | ||||||||||||
Wrentham Village Premium Outlets | Wrentham (Boston), MA | — | | | — | | | | | | 2004 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
The Mills | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona Mills | Tempe (Phoenix), AZ | |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||
Great Mall | Milpitas (San Jose), CA | — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||
Gurnee Mills | Gurnee (Chicago), IL | |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||
Mills at Jersey Gardens, The | Elizabeth, NJ | — |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2015 | (4) | ||||||||||||
Opry Mills | Nashville, TN | |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||
Outlets at Orange, The | Orange (Los Angeles), CA | | | | — | | | | | | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Potomac Mills | Woodbridge (Washington, DC), VA | | | | — | | | | | | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sawgrass Mills | Sunrise (Miami), FL | — | | | | | | | | | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Designer Outlets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
151
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost Capitalized |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subsequent to | Gross Amounts At Which | Date of |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost (3) | Acquisition (3) | Carried At Close of Period | Construction |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and | Buildings and | Buildings and | Accumulated | or |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Location |
| Encumbrances (6) |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Land |
| Improvements |
| Total (1) |
| Depreciation (2) |
| Acquisition |
| |||||||||
La Reggia Designer Outlet | Marcianise (Naples), Italy | |
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2013 | (4) (5) (7) | |||||||||||
Noventa Di Piave Designer Outlet | Venice, Italy | | | | — | | | | | |
| 2013 | (4) (5) (7) | |||||||||||||||||||
Ochtrup Designer Outlet | Ochtrup, Germany | | | | — | — | | | | | 2016 | (4) (5) (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parndorf Designer Outlet | Vienna, Austria | | | | — | | | | | | 2013 | (4) (5) (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provence Designer Outlet | Provence, France | | | | | — | | | | | 2017 | (4) (5) (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Roermond Designer Outlet | Roermond, Netherlands | | | | — | | | | | | 2013 | (4) (5) (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Roosendaal Designer Outlet | Roosendaal, Netherlands | | | | — | | | | | | 2017 | (4) (5) (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lifestyle Centers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABQ Uptown | Albuquerque, NM | — | | | | | | | | | 2011 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Northgate Station | Seattle, WA |
| — |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1987 | ||||
University Park Village | Fort Worth, TX | |
|
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2015 | (4) | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Calhoun Marketplace | Calhoun, GA | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | — |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | | 2010 | (4) | |||
Florida Keys Outlet Center | Florida City, FL | | | | — | | | | | | 2010 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gaffney Marketplace | Gaffney (Greenville/Charlotte), SC | |
|
| |
| |
| — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2010 | (4) | |||||||||||
Orlando Outlet Marketplace | Orlando, FL | — | | | — | | | | | | 2010 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Osage Beach Marketplace | Osage Beach, MO | — | | | — | — | | | | | 2004 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Southridge Mall | Greendale (Milwaukee), WI | | | | | | | | | | 2007 | (4) (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other pre-development costs | | | | | — | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | | | | — | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency Translation Adjustment | — | | | — | | | | | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||
152
Simon Property Group, Inc.
Simon Property Group, L.P.
Notes to Schedule III as of December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
| (1) | Reconciliation of Real Estate Properties: |
The changes in real estate assets for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 are as follows:
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Acquisitions and consolidations (7) |
| |
| — |
| | ||||
Improvements |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Disposals and deconsolidations |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Currency Translation Adjustment | ( | | ( | |||||||
Balance, close of year | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
The unaudited aggregate cost of domestic consolidated real estate assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2021 was $
| (2) | Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation: |
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 are as follows:
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Depreciation expense (7) |
| |
| |
| | ||||
Disposals and deconsolidations |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | ||||
Currency Translation Adjustment | | ( | | |||||||
Balance, close of year | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||
Depreciation of our investment in buildings and improvements reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income is calculated over the estimated original lives of the assets as noted below.
| ● | Buildings and Improvements — typically |
| ● | Tenant Allowances and Improvements — shorter of lease term or useful life. |
| (3) | Initial cost generally represents net book value at December 20, 1993, except for acquired properties and new developments after December 20, 1993. Initial cost also includes any new developments that are opened during the current year. Costs of disposals and impairments of property are first reflected as a reduction to cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition. |
| (4) | Not developed/constructed by us or our predecessors. The date of construction represents the initial acquisition date for assets in which we have acquired multiple interests. |
| (5) | Initial cost for these properties is the cost at the date of consolidation for properties previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. |
| (6) | Encumbrances represent face amount of mortgage debt and exclude any premiums or discounts and deferred financing costs. |
| (7) | Represents the original cost and does not include subsequent currency translation adjustments. |
153