CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.
10-Qs and 10-Ks
PROXIES
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
| þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended
August 31, 2010
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 001-08495
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 16-0716709 | |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
| 207 High Point Drive, Building 100, Victor, New York | 14564 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
(585) 678-7100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
The number of shares outstanding with respect to each of the classes of common stock of
Constellation Brands, Inc., as of September 30, 2010, is set forth below:
| Class | Number of Shares Outstanding | |
| Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | 187,659,975 | |
| Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | 23,687,975 | |
| Class 1 Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | None |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which
are beyond the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
set forth in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. For further information regarding
such forward-looking statements, risks and uncertainties, please see “Information Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements” under Part I — Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
| August 31, | February 28, | |||||||
| 2010 | 2010 | |||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments
|
$ | 13.9 | $ | 43.5 | ||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
720.7 | 514.7 | ||||||
|
Inventories
|
1,722.4 | 1,879.9 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
103.0 | 151.0 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
2,560.0 | 2,589.1 | ||||||
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
1,529.0 | 1,567.2 | ||||||
|
GOODWILL
|
2,566.1 | 2,570.6 | ||||||
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
|
920.1 | 925.0 | ||||||
|
OTHER ASSETS, net
|
301.9 | 442.4 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 7,877.1 | $ | 8,094.3 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
|
Notes payable to banks
|
$ | 347.0 | $ | 371.2 | ||||
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
308.7 | 187.2 | ||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
253.5 | 268.8 | ||||||
|
Accrued excise taxes
|
57.7 | 43.8 | ||||||
|
Other accrued expenses and liabilities
|
482.8 | 501.6 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
1,449.7 | 1,372.6 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities
|
3,127.7 | 3,277.1 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
544.0 | 536.2 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
325.8 | 332.1 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
|
||||||||
|
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value-
Authorized, 322,000,000 shares; Issued, 226,948,305 shares at August 31, 2010, and 225,062,547 shares at February 28, 2010 |
2.3 | 2.3 | ||||||
|
Class B Convertible Common Stock, $.01 par value-
Authorized, 30,000,000 shares; Issued, 28,717,433 shares at August 31, 2010, and 28,734,637 shares at February 28, 2010 |
0.3 | 0.3 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,538.4 | 1,493.2 | ||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
1,243.2 | 1,102.8 | ||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
550.6 | 587.2 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
3,334.8 | 3,185.8 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Less: Treasury stock -
|
||||||||
|
Class A Common Stock, 39,450,317 shares at
August 31, 2010, and 26,549,546 shares at
February 28, 2010, at cost
|
(902.7 | ) | (607.3 | ) | ||||
|
Class B Convertible Common Stock, 5,005,800 shares
at August 31, 2010, and February 28, 2010, at cost
|
(2.2 | ) | (2.2 | ) | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
(904.9 | ) | (609.5 | ) | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
2,429.9 | 2,576.3 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 7,877.1 | $ | 8,094.3 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
2
Table of Contents
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)
(unaudited)
| For the Six Months Ended August 31, | For the Three Months Ended August 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
|
SALES
|
$ | 2,033.1 | $ | 2,094.5 | $ | 1,056.9 | $ | 1,090.7 | ||||||||
|
Less — excise taxes
|
(382.8 | ) | (426.1 | ) | (194.1 | ) | (213.9 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
1,650.3 | 1,668.4 | 862.8 | 876.8 | ||||||||||||
|
COST OF PRODUCT SOLD
|
(1,066.1 | ) | (1,090.1 | ) | (548.6 | ) | (567.2 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
584.2 | 578.3 | 314.2 | 309.6 | ||||||||||||
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
|
(336.1 | ) | (331.4 | ) | (167.3 | ) | (166.3 | ) | ||||||||
|
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
|
(18.6 | ) | (22.1 | ) | (13.7 | ) | (3.2 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Operating income
|
229.5 | 224.8 | 133.2 | 140.1 | ||||||||||||
|
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF EQUITY METHOD
INVESTEES
|
120.9 | 136.0 | 66.4 | 73.2 | ||||||||||||
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net
|
(98.8 | ) | (136.5 | ) | (50.3 | ) | (68.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
251.6 | 224.3 | 149.3 | 145.2 | ||||||||||||
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
(111.2 | ) | (118.1 | ) | (58.0 | ) | (45.5 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NET INCOME
|
$ | 140.4 | $ | 106.2 | $ | 91.3 | $ | 99.7 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
SHARE DATA:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earnings per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic — Class A Common Stock
|
$ | 0.67 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.46 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic — Class B Convertible Common Stock
|
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted — Class A Common Stock
|
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.45 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted — Class B Convertible Common
Stock
|
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.41 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic — Class A Common Stock
|
189.084 | 195.571 | 185.455 | 195.910 | ||||||||||||
|
Basic — Class B Convertible Common Stock
|
23.719 | 23.740 | 23.712 | 23.736 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted — Class A Common Stock
|
215.136 | 220.274 | 211.149 | 220.714 | ||||||||||||
|
Diluted — Class B Convertible Common
Stock
|
23.719 | 23.740 | 23.712 | 23.736 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
(unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
(unaudited)
| For the Six Months Ended August 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 140.4 | $ | 106.2 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
|
61.0 | 77.1 | ||||||
|
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
|
50.6 | (28.7 | ) | |||||
|
Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of distributed earnings
|
36.5 | (12.3 | ) | |||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
25.7 | 25.4 | ||||||
|
Amortization of intangible and other assets
|
7.3 | 6.0 | ||||||
|
Loss (gain) on disposal or impairment of long-lived assets, net
|
4.8 | (1.4 | ) | |||||
|
Loss on business sold
|
— | 0.8 | ||||||
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects
from purchases and sales of businesses:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
(204.5 | ) | (204.5 | ) | ||||
|
Inventories
|
157.2 | 91.3 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
5.3 | 1.0 | ||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
(10.7 | ) | (11.5 | ) | ||||
|
Accrued excise taxes
|
13.2 | 17.6 | ||||||
|
Other accrued expenses and liabilities
|
39.7 | 8.8 | ||||||
|
Other, net
|
(20.8 | ) | 21.6 | |||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Total adjustments
|
165.3 | (8.8 | ) | |||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
305.7 | 97.4 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(43.2 | ) | (65.1 | ) | ||||
|
Investment in equity method investee
|
(29.7 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||
|
(Repayments related to) proceeds from sale of business
|
(1.6 | ) | 276.4 | |||||
|
Proceeds from note receivable
|
60.0 | — | ||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
3.1 | 14.5 | ||||||
|
Other investing activities
|
0.5 | 1.2 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(10.9 | ) | 226.5 | |||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
(300.0 | ) | — | |||||
|
Principal payments of long-term debt
|
(24.5 | ) | (271.4 | ) | ||||
|
Net repayment of notes payable
|
(24.1 | ) | (60.2 | ) | ||||
|
Payment of financing costs of long-term debt
|
(0.2 | ) | — | |||||
|
Exercise of employee stock options
|
18.0 | 9.0 | ||||||
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment awards
|
4.7 | 2.2 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchases
|
2.1 | 2.3 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(324.0 | ) | (318.1 | ) | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash investments
|
(0.4 | ) | 0.8 | |||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS
|
(29.6 | ) | 6.6 | |||||
|
CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS, beginning of period
|
43.5 | 13.1 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS, end of period
|
$ | 13.9 | $ | 19.7 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING
AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment acquired under financing arrangements
|
$ | 4.8 | $ | — | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Note receivable from sale of value spirits business
|
$ | — | $ | 60.0 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 2010
(unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUGUST 31, 2010
(unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Constellation
Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to quarterly reporting on Form
10-Q and reflect, in the opinion of the Company, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the
financial information for the Company. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements, prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed or omitted as
permitted by such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements and related notes
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010. Results
of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual results.
In connection with the Company’s recent changes within its internal management structure for
its United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Australia businesses, and the Company’s revised business strategy
within these markets, the Company changed its reportable operating segments on May 1, 2010, to
consist of: Constellation Wines North America (“CWNA”), Constellation Wines Australia and Europe
(“CWAE”), Corporate Operations and Other, and Crown Imports (see Note 17).
2. RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE:
Consolidation of variable interest entities —
Effective March 1, 2010, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
June 2009 amended guidance for consolidation. This guidance, among other things, (i) requires an
entity to perform an analysis to determine whether an entity’s variable interest or interests give
it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity; (ii) requires ongoing
reassessments of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and
eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of
a variable interest entity; (iii) amends previously issued guidance for determining whether an
entity is a variable interest entity; and (iv) requires enhanced disclosure that will provide
users of financial statements with more transparent information about an entity’s involvement in a
variable interest entity. In addition, effective March 1, 2010, the Company adopted the FASB
additional December 2009 guidance on assessing whether a variable interest entity should be
consolidated. This guidance identifies the determination of whether a reporting entity should
consolidate another entity is based upon, among other things, (i) the other entity’s purpose and
design, and (ii) the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that
most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance. This guidance also requires
additional disclosures about an entity’s involvement with a variable interest entity, including
significant changes in risk exposure due to an entity’s involvement with a variable interest entity
and how the involvement with the variable interest entity affects the financial statements of the
reporting entity. The adoption of the combined guidance did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Fair value measurements and disclosures —
In January 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures.
This guidance requires an entity to (i) disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers
in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers, and
(ii) present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross
basis in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3). This guidance also clarifies existing disclosures requiring an entity to provide fair
value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and, for Level 2 or Level 3
fair value measurements, disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Effective March 1, 2010, the
Company adopted the additional disclosure requirements and clarifications of existing disclosures
of this guidance, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in
the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The Company is required to adopt those disclosures for its annual and interim periods beginning
March 1, 2011. The adoption of the applicable provisions of this guidance on March 1, 2010, did
not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company does
not expect the adoption of the remaining provision of this guidance to have a material impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
3. INVENTORIES:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (computed in accordance with the first-in,
first-out method) or market. Elements of cost include materials, labor and overhead and consist of
the following:
| August 31, | February 28, | |||||||
| (in millions ) | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
$ | 45.8 | $ | 44.3 | ||||
|
In-process inventories
|
1,162.7 | 1,325.0 | ||||||
|
Finished case goods
|
513.9 | 510.6 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
$ | 1,722.4 | $ | 1,879.9 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
4. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:
As a multinational company, the Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and interest rates that could affect the Company’s results of operations
and financial condition. The amount of volatility realized will vary based upon the effectiveness
and level of derivative instruments outstanding during a particular period of time, as well as the
currency and interest rate market movements during that same period.
The Company enters into derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps and foreign
currency forward and option contracts, to manage interest rate and foreign currency risks. In
accordance with the FASB guidance for derivatives and hedging, the Company recognizes all
derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures those instruments at
fair value. The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments change with fluctuations in
interest rates and/or currency rates and are expected to offset changes in the values of the
underlying exposures. The Company’s derivative instruments are held solely to hedge economic
exposures. The Company follows strict policies to manage interest rate and foreign currency risks,
including prohibitions on derivative market-making or other speculative activities.
6
Table of Contents
To qualify for hedge accounting treatment under the FASB guidance for derivatives and hedging,
the details of the hedging relationship must be formally documented at inception of the
arrangement, including the risk management objective, hedging strategy, hedged item, specific risk
that is being hedged, the derivative instrument, how effectiveness is being assessed and how
ineffectiveness will be measured. The derivative must be highly effective in offsetting either
changes in the fair value or cash flows, as appropriate, of the risk being hedged. Effectiveness
is evaluated on a retrospective and prospective basis based on quantitative measures.
Certain of the Company’s derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under the FASB guidance for derivatives and hedging; for others, the Company chooses not to
maintain the required documentation to apply hedge accounting treatment. These undesignated
instruments are used to economically hedge the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the value of
foreign currency denominated receivables and payables; foreign currency investments, primarily
consisting of loans to subsidiaries; and cash flows related primarily to repatriation of those
loans or investments. Foreign currency contracts, generally less than 12 months in duration, are
used to hedge some of these risks. The Company’s derivative policy permits the use of undesignated
derivatives when the derivative instrument is settled within the fiscal quarter or offsets a
recognized balance sheet exposure. In these circumstances, the mark to fair value is reported
currently through earnings in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of August 31, 2010, and February 28, 2010, the Company
had undesignated foreign currency contracts outstanding with a notional value of $761.8 million and
$554.9 million, respectively. In addition, the Company had offsetting undesignated interest rate
swap agreements with an absolute notional amount of $2,400.0 million outstanding at February 28,
2010 (see Note 9). The Company had no undesignated interest rate swap agreements outstanding as of
August 31, 2010.
Furthermore, when the Company determines that a derivative instrument which qualified for
hedge accounting treatment has ceased to be highly effective as a hedge, the Company discontinues
hedge accounting prospectively. The Company also discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when
(i) a derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (ii) it is no longer probable that
the forecasted transaction will occur; or (iii) management determines that designating the
derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.
Cash flow hedges:
The Company is exposed to foreign denominated cash flow fluctuations in connection with third
party and intercompany sales and purchases and, historically, third party financing arrangements.
The Company primarily uses foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge certain of these
risks. In addition, the Company utilizes interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to changes in
interest rates. Derivatives managing the Company’s cash flow exposures generally mature within
three years or less, with a maximum maturity of five years. Throughout the term of the designated
cash flow hedge relationship, but at least quarterly, a retrospective evaluation and prospective
assessment of hedge effectiveness is performed. All components of the Company’s derivative
instruments’ gains or losses are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. In the event
the relationship is no longer effective, the Company recognizes the change in the fair value of the
hedging derivative instrument from the date the hedging derivative instrument became no longer
effective immediately in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. In conjunction with
its effectiveness testing, the Company also evaluates ineffectiveness associated with the hedge
relationship. Resulting ineffectiveness, if any, is recognized immediately in the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
7
Table of Contents
The Company records the fair value of its foreign currency and interest rate swap contracts
qualifying for cash flow hedge accounting treatment in its consolidated balance sheet with the
effective portion of the related gain or loss on those contracts deferred in stockholders’ equity
(as a component of AOCI (as defined in Note 14)). These deferred gains or losses are recognized in
the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations in the same period in which the underlying
hedged items are recognized and on the same line item as the underlying hedged items. However, to
the extent that any derivative instrument is not considered to be highly effective in offsetting
the change in the value of the hedged item, the hedging relationship is terminated and the amount
related to the ineffective portion of this derivative instrument is immediately recognized in the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations in selling, general and administrative expenses.
As of August 31, 2010, and February 28, 2010, the Company had cash flow designated foreign
currency contracts outstanding with a notional value of $528.6 million and $465.2 million,
respectively. In addition, as of August 31, 2010, and February 28, 2010, the Company had cash flow
designated interest rate swap agreements outstanding with a notional value of $500.0 million and
$1,200.0 million, respectively (see Note 9). The Company expects $3.1 million of net gains, net of
income tax effect, to be reclassified from AOCI to earnings within the next 12 months.
Fair value hedges:
Fair value hedges are hedges that offset the risk of changes in the fair values of recorded
assets and liabilities, and firm commitments. The Company records changes in fair value of
derivative instruments which are designated and deemed effective as fair value hedges, in earnings
offset by the corresponding changes in the fair value of the hedged items. The Company did not
designate any derivative instruments as fair value hedges for the six months and three months ended
August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009.
Net investment hedges:
Net investment hedges are hedges that use derivative instruments or non-derivative instruments
to hedge the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Historically,
the Company has managed currency exposures resulting from certain of its net investments in foreign
subsidiaries principally with debt denominated in the related foreign currency. Accordingly, gains
and losses on these instruments were recorded as foreign currency translation adjustments in AOCI.
The Company did not designate any derivative or non-derivative instruments as net investment hedges
for the six months and three months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009.
Fair values of derivative instruments:
The fair value and location of the Company’s derivative instruments on its Consolidated
Balance Sheets are as follows (see Note 5):
| August 31, | February 28, | |||||||
| Balance Sheet Location | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments
|
||||||||
|
Foreign
currency contracts
|
||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
$ | 16.7 | $ | 17.1 | ||||
|
Other accrued expenses and liabilities
|
$ | 11.5 | $ | 15.1 | ||||
|
Other assets, net
|
$ | 7.0 | $ | 13.5 | ||||
|
Other liabilities
|
$ | 1.8 | $ | 5.5 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Interest
rate swap contracts
|
||||||||
|
Other accrued expenses and liabilities
|
$ | — | $ | 11.8 | ||||
|
Other liabilities
|
$ | 19.7 | $ | — | ||||
8
Table of Contents
| August 31, | February 28, | |||||||
| Balance Sheet Location | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments
|
||||||||
|
Foreign
currency contracts
|
||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
$ | 11.9 | $ | 12.0 | ||||
|
Other accrued expenses and liabilities
|
$ | 7.5 | $ | 7.8 | ||||
|
Other assets, net
|
$ | 0.1 | $ | 1.6 | ||||
|
Other liabilities
|
$ | 0.2 | $ | 1.2 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Interest
rate swap contracts
|
||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
$ | — | $ | 2.7 | ||||
|
Other accrued expenses and liabilities
|
$ | — | $ | 2.9 | ||||
The effect of the Company’s derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging
relationships on its Consolidated Statements of Operations, as well as its Other Comprehensive
Income (“OCI”), net of income tax effect, is as follows:
| Net | ||||||||||
| Net | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||
| Gain (Loss) | Reclassified | |||||||||
| Recognized | from AOCI to | |||||||||
| Derivative Instruments in | in OCI | Location of Net Gain (Loss) | Income | |||||||
| Designated Cash Flow | (Effective | Reclassified from AOCI to | (Effective | |||||||
| Hedging Relationships | portion) | Income (Effective portion) | portion) | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | 0.1 | Sales | $ | 7.9 | |||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
(2.1 | ) | Cost of product sold | 1.3 | ||||||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
(12.0 | ) | Interest expense, net | — | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | (14.0 | ) | Total | $ | 9.2 | ||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | 32.0 | Sales | $ | 7.1 | |||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
13.8 | Cost of product sold | (5.6 | ) | ||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
8.2 | Selling, general and administrative expenses | 18.5 | |||||||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
(4.5 | ) | Interest expense, net | (12.9 | ) | |||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 49.5 | Total | $ | 7.1 | |||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | 1.2 | Sales | $ | 4.3 | |||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
1.2 | Cost of product sold | (0.9 | ) | ||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
— | Selling, general and administrative expenses | — | |||||||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
(12.0 | ) | Interest expense, net | — | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | (9.6 | ) | Total | $ | 3.4 | ||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | (1.4 | ) | Sales | $ | 3.8 | ||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
2.7 | Cost of product sold | (2.7 | ) | ||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
0.9 | Selling, general and administrative expenses | 0.7 | |||||||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
(1.3 | ) | Interest expense, net | (7.1 | ) | |||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 0.9 | Total | $ | (5.3 | ) | ||||
|
|
||||||||||
9
Table of Contents
| Net Gain | ||||||
| Recognized | ||||||
| Derivative Instruments in | Location of Net Gain | in Income | ||||
| Designated Cash Flow | Recognized in Income | (Ineffective | ||||
| Hedging Relationships | (Ineffective portion) | portion) | ||||
| (in millions) | ||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 0.7 | |||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 0.1 | |||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 0.4 | |||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 0.1 | |||
|
|
||||||
The effect of the Company’s undesignated derivative instruments on its Consolidated Statements
of Operations is as follows:
| Net | ||||||
| (Loss) Gain | ||||||
| Derivative Instruments not | Location of Net (Loss) Gain | Recognized | ||||
| Designated as Hedging Instruments | Recognized in Income | in Income | ||||
| (in millions) | ||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | (1.0 | ) | ||
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$ | (1.0 | ) | |||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 8.0 | |||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Interest expense, net | (0.4 | ) | |||
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 7.6 | ||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 3.3 | |||
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 3.3 | ||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 5.3 | |||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Interest expense, net | (0.1 | ) | |||
|
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 5.2 | ||||
|
|
||||||
10
Table of Contents
Credit risk:
The Company enters into master agreements with its bank derivative trading counterparties that
allow netting of certain derivative positions in order to manage credit risk. The Company’s
derivative instruments are not subject to credit rating contingencies or collateral requirements.
As of August 31, 2010, the fair value of derivative instruments in a net liability position due to
counterparties was $30.0 million. If the Company were required to settle the net liability
position under these derivative instruments on August 31, 2010, the Company would have had
sufficient availability under its revolving credit facility to satisfy this obligation.
Counterparty credit risk:
Counterparty credit risk relates to losses the Company could incur if a counterparty defaults
on a derivative contract. The Company manages exposure to counterparty credit risk by requiring
specified minimum credit standards and diversification of counterparties. The Company enters into
master agreements with its bank derivative trading counterparties that allow netting of certain
derivative positions in order to manage counterparty credit risk. As of August 31, 2010, all of
the Company’s counterparty exposures are with financial institutions which have investment grade
ratings. The Company has procedures to monitor counterparty credit risk for both current and
future potential credit exposures. As of August 31, 2010, the fair value of derivative instruments
in a net receivable position due from counterparties was $25.0 million.
5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The Company calculates the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices
whenever available. When quoted market prices are not available, the Company uses standard pricing
models for various types of financial instruments (such as forwards, options, swaps, etc.) which
take into account the present value of estimated future cash flows.
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are
summarized as follows:
| August 31, 2010 | February 28, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Amount | Value | Amount | Value | ||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments
|
$ | 13.9 | $ | 13.9 | $ | 43.5 | $ | 43.5 | ||||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
$ | 720.7 | $ | 720.7 | $ | 514.7 | $ | 514.7 | ||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | 35.7 | $ | 35.7 | $ | 44.2 | $ | 44.2 | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap
contracts
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 2.7 | $ | 2.7 | ||||||||
|
Notes receivable
|
$ | 4.9 | $ | 4.9 | $ | 65.7 | $ | 65.7 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Notes payable to banks
|
$ | 347.0 | $ | 337.7 | $ | 371.2 | $ | 370.1 | ||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$ | 253.5 | $ | 253.5 | $ | 268.8 | $ | 268.8 | ||||||||
|
Long-term debt, including
current portion
|
$ | 3,436.4 | $ | 3,482.5 | $ | 3,464.3 | $ | 3,483.4 | ||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | 21.0 | $ | 21.0 | $ | 29.6 | $ | 29.6 | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap
contracts
|
$ | 19.7 | $ | 19.7 | $ | 14.7 | $ | 14.7 | ||||||||
11
Table of Contents
The following methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value of each class
of financial instruments:
Cash and cash investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable:
The carrying amounts
approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Foreign currency contracts:
The fair value is estimated using market-based inputs, obtained
from independent pricing services, into valuation models (see “Fair value measurements” below).
Interest rate swap contracts:
The fair value is estimated based on quoted market prices from
respective counterparties (see “Fair value measurements” below).
Notes receivable:
These instruments are fixed interest rate bearing notes. The fair value is
estimated by discounting cash flows using market-based inputs, including counterparty credit risk.
Notes payable to banks:
The revolving credit facility under the 2006 Credit Agreement (as
defined in Note 9) is a variable interest rate bearing note which includes a fixed margin which is
adjustable based upon the Company’s debt ratio (as defined in the 2006 Credit Agreement). The fair
value of the revolving credit facility is estimated by discounting cash flows using LIBOR plus a
margin reflecting current market conditions obtained from participating member financial
institutions. The remaining instruments are variable interest rate bearing notes for which the
carrying value approximates the fair value.
Long-term debt:
The tranche A term loan facility under the 2006 Credit Agreement is a
variable interest rate bearing note which includes a fixed margin which is adjustable based upon
the Company’s debt ratio. The tranche B term loan facility under the 2006 Credit Agreement is a
variable interest rate bearing note which includes a fixed margin. The fair value of the tranche A
term loan facility and the tranche B term loan facility is estimated by discounting cash flows
using LIBOR plus a margin reflecting current market conditions obtained from participating member
financial institutions. The fair value of the remaining long-term debt, which is all fixed rate,
is estimated by discounting cash flows using interest rates currently available for debt with
similar terms and maturities.
Fair value measurements —
The FASB guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance emphasizes that fair value is a
market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and states that a fair value
measurement should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability. In addition, the fair value measurement guidance establishes a hierarchy
for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes
the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.
The hierarchy is broken down into three levels: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs include data points that are observable
such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical assets or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other
than quoted prices) such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable for the asset and
liability, either directly or indirectly; Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset
or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset
or liability.
12
Table of Contents
The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis:
| Quoted | Significant | |||||||||||||||
| Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
| Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
| Markets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | ||||||||||||
|
August 31,
2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | — | $ | 35.7 | $ | — | $ | 35.7 | ||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | — | $ | 21.0 | $ | — | $ | 21.0 | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
$ | — | $ | 19.7 | $ | — | $ | 19.7 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
February 28,
2010
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | — | $ | 44.2 | $ | — | $ | 44.2 | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
$ | — | $ | 2.7 | $ | — | $ | 2.7 | ||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
$ | — | $ | 29.6 | $ | — | $ | 29.6 | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
$ | — | $ | 14.7 | $ | — | $ | 14.7 | ||||||||
The Company’s foreign currency contracts consist of foreign currency forward and option
contracts which are valued using market-based inputs, obtained from independent pricing services,
into valuation models. These valuation models require various inputs, including contractual terms,
market foreign exchange prices, interest-rate yield curves and currency volatilities. Interest
rate swap fair values are based on quotes from respective counterparties. Quotes are corroborated
by the Company using discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward interest-rate yield
curves, which are obtained from independent pricing services.
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis for which an impairment assessment was performed for the six months and three
months ended August 31, 2010. There were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis during the six months and three months ended August 31, 2009.
| Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
| Quoted | Significant | |||||||||||||||
| Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
| Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
| Markets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total Losses | ||||||||||||
|
Long-lived assets held for sale
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 4.1 | $ | 5.8 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 4.1 | $ | 5.8 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets held for sale:
In
connection with the Company’s Australian Initiative (as defined
in Note 15), long-lived assets held for sale with a
carrying value of $10.1 million were written down to their estimated fair value of $4.1 million,
less cost to sell (which was estimated to be minimal), resulting in a loss of $5.8 million for the
six months and three months ended August 31, 2010. This loss is included in restructuring charges
on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. These assets consisted primarily of
certain winery and vineyard assets which had satisfied the conditions necessary to be classified as
held for sale. As such, these assets were written down to a value based on the Company’s estimate
of fair value less cost to sell. The fair value was determined based on a market value approach
adjusted for the different characteristics between assets measured and the assets upon which the
observable inputs were based.
13
Table of Contents
6. GOODWILL:
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
| Consolidations | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Crown | and | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | CWNA | CWAE | Imports | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
|
Balance, February 28, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
$ | 2,615.0 | $ | 852.6 | $ | 13.0 | $ | (13.0 | ) | $ | 3,467.6 | |||||||||
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
— | (852.6 | ) | — | — | (852.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2,615.0 | — | 13.0 | (13.0 | ) | 2,615.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
114.1 | — | — | — | 114.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Divestiture of business
|
(158.5 | ) | — | — | — | (158.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, February 28, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
2,570.6 | 852.6 | 13.0 | (13.0 | ) | 3,423.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
— | (852.6 | ) | — | — | (852.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2,570.6 | — | 13.0 | (13.0 | ) | 2,570.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(4.5 | ) | — | — | — | (4.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, August 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
2,566.1 | 852.6 | 13.0 | (13.0 | ) | 3,418.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
— | (852.6 | ) | — | — | (852.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
$ | 2,566.1 | $ | — | $ | 13.0 | $ | (13.0 | ) | $ | 2,566.1 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended February 28, 2010, the Company’s CWNA segment’s divestiture of
business consists of the reduction of goodwill in connection with the divestiture of its value
spirits business in March 2009. The Company sold its value spirits business for $336.4 million,
net of direct costs to sell. The Company received $276.4 million, net of direct costs to sell, in
cash proceeds and a note receivable for $60.0 million in connection with this divestiture. In
March 2010, the Company received full payment of the note receivable. In connection with the
classification of the value spirits business as an asset group held for sale as of February 28,
2009, the Company recorded a loss of $15.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, primarily
related to asset impairments. For the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recognized a net
gain of $0.2 million, which included a gain on settlement of a postretirement obligation of $1.0
million, partially offset by an additional loss of $0.8 million. This net gain is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the six months ended August 31, 2009.
7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
The major components of intangible assets are as follows:
| August 31, 2010 | February 28, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||
| Carrying | Carrying | Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Amount | Amount | Amount | Amount | ||||||||||||
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Customer relationships
|
$ | 84.7 | $ | 66.2 | $ | 85.0 | $ | 69.0 | ||||||||
|
Other
|
2.6 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 87.3 | 66.3 | $ | 87.6 | 69.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Nonamortizable intangible assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Trademarks
|
844.2 | 846.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
9.6 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
853.8 | 855.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
$ | 920.1 | $ | 925.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
The Company did not incur costs to renew or extend the term of acquired intangible assets
during the six months and three months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009. The difference
between the gross carrying amount and net carrying amount for each item presented is attributable
to accumulated amortization. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $2.8 million for the
six months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, and $1.4 for the three months ended August
31, 2010, and August 31, 2009. Estimated amortization expense for the remaining six months of
fiscal 2011 and for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
| (in millions ) | ||||
|
2011
|
$ | 2.8 | ||
|
2012
|
$ | 4.9 | ||
|
2013
|
$ | 4.8 | ||
|
2014
|
$ | 4.8 | ||
|
2015
|
$ | 4.8 | ||
|
2016
|
$ | 4.8 | ||
|
Thereafter
|
$ | 39.4 |
8. INVESTMENTS IN EQUITY METHOD INVESTEES:
Crown Imports:
Constellation Beers Ltd. (“Constellation Beers”) (previously known as Barton Beers, Ltd.), an
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Diblo, S.A. de C.V. (“Diblo”), an entity owned
76.75% by Grupo Modelo, S.A.B. de C.V. (“Modelo”) and 23.25% by Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.,
each have, directly or indirectly, equal interests in a joint venture, Crown Imports LLC (“Crown
Imports”). Crown Imports has the exclusive right to import, market and sell Modelo’s Mexican beer
portfolio (the “Modelo Brands”) in the U.S. and Guam. In addition, Crown Imports also has the
exclusive rights to import, market and sell the Tsingtao and St. Pauli Girl brands in the U.S.
The Company accounts for its investment in Crown Imports under the equity method.
Accordingly, the results of operations of Crown Imports are included in equity in earnings of
equity method investees on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of August 31,
2010, and February 28, 2010, the Company’s investment in Crown Imports was $130.8 million and
$167.2 million, respectively. The carrying amount of the investment is greater than the Company’s
equity in the underlying assets of Crown Imports by $13.6 million due to the difference in the
carrying amounts of the indefinite lived intangible assets contributed to Crown Imports by each
party. The Company received $156.0 million and $123.7 million of cash distributions from Crown
Imports for the six months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, respectively, all of which
represent distributions of earnings.
Constellation Beers provides certain administrative services to Crown Imports. Amounts
related to the performance of these services for the six months and three months ended August 31,
2010, and August 31, 2009, were not material. In addition, as of August 31, 2010, and February 28,
2010, amounts receivable from Crown Imports were not material.
15
Table of Contents
The following table presents summarized financial information for the Company’s Crown Imports
equity method investment. The amounts shown represent 100% of this equity method investments’
results of operations.
| Crown | ||||
| (in millions) | Imports | |||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 1,300.9 | ||
|
Gross profit
|
$ | 368.0 | ||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 239.2 | ||
|
Net income
|
$ | 239.2 | ||
|
|
||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 1,335.5 | ||
|
Gross profit
|
$ | 395.1 | ||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 270.2 | ||
|
Net income
|
$ | 270.2 | ||
|
|
||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 679.4 | ||
|
Gross profit
|
$ | 191.8 | ||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 130.7 | ||
|
Net income
|
$ | 130.7 | ||
|
|
||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 696.4 | ||
|
Gross profit
|
$ | 204.5 | ||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 144.5 | ||
|
Net income
|
$ | 144.5 | ||
Other:
In connection with the Company’s December 2004 investment in Ruffino S.r.l. (“Ruffino”), the
Company granted separate irrevocable and unconditional options to the two other shareholders of
Ruffino to put to the Company all of the ownership interests held by these shareholders for a price
as calculated in the joint venture agreement. Each option may be exercised during the period
starting from January 1, 2010, and ending on December 31, 2010. For the year ended February 28,
2010, in connection with the notification by the 9.9% shareholder of Ruffino to exercise the option
to put its entire equity interest in Ruffino to the Company for the specified minimum value of
€23.5 million, the Company recognized a loss of $34.3 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
on the contractual obligation created by this notification. In May 2010, the Company settled this
put option through a cash payment of €23.5 million ($29.6 million) to the 9.9% shareholder of
Ruffino, thereby increasing the Company’s equity interest in Ruffino to 49.9%. The price of the
other option, which represents the remaining 50.1% interest in Ruffino, is based upon a formula
contained in the joint venture agreement. The formula is subject to a number of variables,
including future results of Ruffino. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the variables
in the formula on the cash settlement if the 50.1% shareholder of Ruffino were to exercise the
option to put its entire equity interest in Ruffino to the Company. Subject to the mutual
agreement and understanding of the respective rights of each of the parties to this put option, the
Company currently estimates that the cash settlement for this put option could be as much as €55
million ($70 million). As of August 31, 2010, the Company concluded that it is not probable that
there is a likelihood of loss under this contingent obligation. Therefore, no liability has been
recorded by the Company related to this contingent obligation and an estimate of any loss is
currently not estimable. As of August 31, 2010, and February 28, 2010, the Company’s investment in
Ruffino was $4.1 million.
16
Table of Contents
9. BORROWINGS:
Borrowings consist of the following:
| February 28, | ||||||||||||||||
| August 31, 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Current | Long-term | Total | Total | ||||||||||||
|
Notes Payable to Banks
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Senior Credit Facility —
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revolving Credit Loans
|
$ | 277.0 | $ | — | $ | 277.0 | $ | 289.3 | ||||||||
|
Other
|
70.0 | — | 70.0 | 81.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
$ | 347.0 | $ | — | $ | 347.0 | $ | 371.2 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term Debt
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Senior Credit Facility — Term Loans
|
$ | 302.8 | $ | 1,225.2 | $ | 1,528.0 | $ | 1,549.1 | ||||||||
|
Senior Notes
|
— | 1,893.1 | 1,893.1 | 1,892.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Other Long-term Debt
|
5.9 | 9.4 | 15.3 | 22.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
$ | 308.7 | $ | 3,127.7 | $ | 3,436.4 | $ | 3,464.3 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Senior credit facility —
The Company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a lender and
administrative agent, and certain other agents, lenders, and financial institutions are parties to
a credit agreement, as amended (the “2006 Credit Agreement”). The 2006 Credit Agreement provides
for aggregate credit facilities of $3,842.0 million, consisting of (i) a $1,200.0 million tranche
A term loan facility with a final maturity in June 2011 (the “Tranche A Term Loans”), (ii) a
$1,800.0 million tranche B term loan facility, of which $1,500.0 million has a final maturity in
June 2013 (the “2013 Tranche B Term Loans”) and $300.0 million has a final maturity in June 2015
(the “2015 Tranche B Term Loans”), and (iii) an $842.0 million revolving credit facility
(including a sub-facility for letters of credit of up to $200 million), of which $192.0 million
terminates in June 2011 (the “2011 Revolving Facility”) and $650.0 million terminates in June 2013
(the “2013 Revolving Facility”). The Company uses its revolving credit facility under the 2006
Credit Agreement for general corporate purposes.
As of August 31, 2010, under the 2006 Credit Agreement, the Company had outstanding Tranche A
Term Loans of $300.0 million bearing an interest rate of 1.6%, 2013 Tranche B Term Loans of $928.0
million bearing an interest rate of 1.8%, 2015 Tranche B Term Loans of $300.0 million bearing an
interest rate of 3.1%, 2011 Revolving Facility of $55.9 million bearing an interest rate of 1.6%,
2013 Revolving Facility of $221.1 million bearing an interest rate of 2.7%, outstanding letters of
credit of $13.9 million, and $551.1 million in revolving loans available to be drawn.
17
Table of Contents
Through February 28, 2010, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements which
were designated as cash flow hedges of $1,200.0 million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt.
The designated cash flow hedges fixed the Company’s interest rates on $1,200.0 million of the
Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt through February 28, 2010. In addition, the Company had
offsetting undesignated interest rate swap agreements with an absolute notional amount of $2,400.0
million outstanding as of February 28, 2010. On March 1, 2010, the Company paid $11.9 million in
connection with the maturity of these outstanding interest rate swap agreements, which is reported
in other, net in cash flows from operating activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows. In June 2010, the Company entered into a new five year delayed start interest rate
swap agreement effective September 1, 2011, which was designated as a cash flow hedge for $500.0
million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt. Accordingly, the Company fixed its interest
rates on $500.0 million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt at an average rate of 2.9%
(exclusive of borrowing margins) through September 1, 2016. For the six months and three months
ended August 31, 2009, the Company reclassified net losses of $12.9 million and $7.1 million, net
of income tax effect, respectively, from AOCI to interest expense, net on the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company did not reclassify any amount from AOCI to
interest expense, net on its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months and three
months ended August 31, 2010.
10. INCOME TAXES:
The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31,
2009, was 44.2% and 52.7%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended
August 31, 2010, includes the recognition of a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in
the U.K. of $30.1 million, partially offset by a decrease in uncertain tax positions in connection
with the completion of various income tax examinations during the six months ended August 31, 2010.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, lower estimates of future U.K. operating results and cash
flows, combined with cumulative losses in recent years in the U.K., impacted the Company’s
assessment regarding the realizability of certain deferred tax assets in the U.K. As a result of
this assessment, the Company determined that additional valuation allowances were required in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended August 31,
2009, includes $37.5 million of taxes associated with the sale of the value spirits business,
primarily related to the write-off of nondeductible goodwill, partially offset by a decrease in
uncertain tax positions in connection with the completion of various income tax examinations during
the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31,
2009, was 38.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates for both the three
months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, reflect, among other items, decreases in
uncertain tax positions in connection with the completion of various income tax examinations during
each respective period. The amount of the decrease recorded for the three months ended August 31,
2010, was less than the amount recorded for the three months ended August 31, 2009.
18
Table of Contents
11. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS:
Net periodic benefit cost reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
Company’s defined benefit pension plans includes the following components:
| For the Six Months | For the Three Months | |||||||||||||||
| Ended August 31, | Ended August 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$ | 2.2 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 0.6 | ||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
11.7 | 10.7 | 5.9 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(12.6 | ) | (12.5 | ) | (6.4 | ) | (6.6 | ) | ||||||||
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
0.1 | — | 0.1 | — | ||||||||||||
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
4.8 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Recognized net loss due to settlement
|
— | 1.1 | — | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 6.2 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 3.1 | $ | 1.9 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Contributions of $5.4 million have been made by the Company to fund its defined benefit
pension plans for the six months ended August 31, 2010. The Company presently anticipates
contributing an additional $5.2 million to fund its defined benefit pension plans during the year
ending February 28, 2011, resulting in total employer contributions of $10.6 million for the year
ending February 28, 2011.
12. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
In April 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300.0
million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Convertible Common Stock. Pursuant to
this authorization, the Company repurchased $300.0 million of its shares of Class A Common Stock
through a collared accelerated stock buyback (“ASB”) transaction which was announced in April 2010.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received 13,801,480 shares of Class A Common
Stock, representing the minimum number of shares that will be received under the ASB transaction.
The Company used revolver borrowings under the 2006 Credit Agreement to pay the purchase price for
the repurchased shares. The repurchased shares that have been received have become treasury
shares. The final number of shares to which the Company is entitled under the ASB transaction will
generally be based on the average of the daily volume weighted average prices of the Company’s
Class A Common Stock over a calculation period (scheduled to end on November 24, 2010, subject to
being shortened by the counterparty to the ASB transaction), but no less than 13,801,480 shares or
more than 18,401,973 shares subject to certain terms of the ASB transaction. The Company paid the
purchase price under the ASB transaction in April 2010, at which time it received an initial
installment of 11,016,451 shares of Class A Common Stock. In May 2010, the Company received an
additional 2,785,029 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the early termination of the
hedge period on May 10, 2010. The Company may be entitled to receive up to 4,600,493 additional
shares pursuant to the ASB transaction following the end of the calculation period.
19
Table of Contents
13. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
The Company has two classes of outstanding common stock: Class A Common Stock and Class B
Convertible Common Stock. Earnings per common share — basic excludes the effect of common stock
equivalents and is computed using the two-class computation method. Earnings per common share -
diluted for Class A Common Stock reflects the potential dilution that could result if securities or
other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Earnings per
common share — diluted for Class A Common Stock has been computed using the more dilutive of the
if-converted or two-class computation method. Using the if-converted method, earnings per common
share — diluted for Class A Common Stock assumes the exercise of stock options using the treasury
stock method and the conversion of Class B Convertible Common Stock. Using the two-class
computation method, earnings per common share — diluted for Class A Common Stock assumes the
exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method and no conversion of Class B Convertible
Common Stock. For the six months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, earnings per common
share — diluted for Class A Common Stock has been calculated using the if-converted method. For
the six months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, earnings per common share — diluted for
Class B Convertible Common Stock is presented without assuming conversion into Class A Common Stock
and is computed using the two-class computation method. For the three months ended August 31,
2010, and August 31, 2009, earnings per common share — diluted for Class A Common Stock has been
calculated using the if-converted method. For the three months ended August 31, 2010, and August
31, 2009, earnings per common share — diluted for Class B Convertible Common Stock is presented
without assuming conversion into Class A Common Stock and is computed using the two-class
computation method.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows:
| For the Six Months | For the Three Months | |||||||||||||||
| Ended August 31, | Ended August 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except per share data) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
$ | 140.4 | $ | 106.2 | $ | 91.3 | $ | 99.7 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Class A Common Stock
|
189.084 | 195.571 | 185.455 | 195.910 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Class B Convertible Common Stock
|
23.719 | 23.740 | 23.712 | 23.736 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding —
diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Class A Common Stock
|
189.084 | 195.571 | 185.455 | 195.910 | ||||||||||||
|
Class B Convertible Common Stock
|
23.719 | 23.740 | 23.712 | 23.736 | ||||||||||||
|
Stock-based awards, primarily stock options
|
2.333 | 0.963 | 1.982 | 1.068 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding —
diluted
|
215.136 | 220.274 | 211.149 | 220.714 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earnings per common share — basic:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Class A Common Stock
|
$ | 0.67 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.46 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Class B Convertible Common Stock
|
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Earnings per common share — diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Class A Common Stock
|
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.45 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Class B Convertible Common Stock
|
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.41 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
For the six months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, stock-based awards,
primarily stock options, which could result in the issuance of 23.5 million and 32.8 million
shares, respectively, of Class A Common Stock were outstanding, but were not included in the
computation of earnings per common share – diluted for Class A Common Stock because the effect of
including such awards would have been antidilutive. For the three months ended August 31, 2010,
and August 31, 2009, stock-based awards, primarily stock options, which could result in the
issuance of 25.3 million and 32.5 million shares, respectively, of Class A Common Stock were
outstanding, but were not included in the computation of earnings per
common share – diluted for
Class A Common Stock because the effect of including such awards would have been antidilutive.
14. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Comprehensive income consists of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, net
unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments and pension/postretirement adjustments. The
reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income is as follows:
| Before Tax | Tax Benefit | Net of Tax | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | Amount | (Expense) | Amount | |||||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 140.4 | ||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
$ | (14.3 | ) | $ | (1.6 | ) | (15.9 | ) | ||||
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net derivative losses
|
(19.1 | ) | 5.1 | (14.0 | ) | |||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
(13.3 | ) | 3.4 | (9.9 | ) | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
(32.4 | ) | 8.5 | (23.9 | ) | |||||||
|
Pension/postretirement:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net losses arising during the period
|
(0.7 | ) | 0.4 | (0.3 | ) | |||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
4.9 | (1.4 | ) | 3.5 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net gain recognized in other comprehensive income
|
4.2 | (1.0 | ) | 3.2 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
$ | (42.5 | ) | $ | 5.9 | (36.6 | ) | |||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$ | 103.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 106.2 | ||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
$ | 429.4 | $ | (3.8 | ) | 425.6 | ||||||
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net derivative gains
|
74.4 | (24.9 | ) | 49.5 | ||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
(13.9 | ) | 6.7 | (7.2 | ) | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net gain recognized in other comprehensive income
|
60.5 | (18.2 | ) | 42.3 | ||||||||
|
Pension/postretirement:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net losses arising during the period
|
(10.7 | ) | 2.9 | (7.8 | ) | |||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
2.2 | (0.5 | ) | 1.7 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
(8.5 | ) | 2.4 | (6.1 | ) | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
$ | 481.4 | $ | (19.6 | ) | 461.8 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$ | 568.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
| Before Tax | Tax Benefit | Net of Tax | ||||||||||
| Amount | (Expense) | Amount | ||||||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 91.3 | ||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
$ | 36.8 | $ | 2.5 | 39.3 | |||||||
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net derivative losses
|
(14.1 | ) | 4.5 | (9.6 | ) | |||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
(5.3 | ) | 1.5 | (3.8 | ) | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
(19.4 | ) | 6.0 | (13.4 | ) | |||||||
|
Pension/postretirement:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net losses arising during the period
|
(6.7 | ) | 2.1 | (4.6 | ) | |||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
2.5 | (0.7 | ) | 1.8 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
(4.2 | ) | 1.4 | (2.8 | ) | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
$ | 13.2 | $ | 9.9 | 23.1 | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$ | 114.4 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 99.7 | ||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
$ | 59.9 | $ | 0.9 | 60.8 | |||||||
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net derivative gains
|
9.3 | (8.4 | ) | 0.9 | ||||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
6.5 | (1.3 | ) | 5.2 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net gain recognized in other comprehensive income
|
15.8 | (9.7 | ) | 6.1 | ||||||||
|
Pension/postretirement:
|
||||||||||||
|
Net losses arising during the period
|
(0.5 | ) | — | (0.5 | ) | |||||||
|
Reclassification adjustments
|
2.2 | (0.6 | ) | 1.6 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Net gain recognized in other comprehensive income
|
1.7 | (0.6 | ) | 1.1 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
$ | 77.4 | $ | (9.4 | ) | 68.0 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$ | 167.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of income tax effect, includes the
following components:
| Net | ||||||||||||||||
| Foreign | Unrealized | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||
| Currency | Gains | Other | ||||||||||||||
| Translation | (Losses) on | Pension/ | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Adjustments | Derivatives | Postretirement | Income | ||||||||||||
|
Balance, February 28, 2010
|
$ | 672.9 | $ | 19.6 | $ | (105.3 | ) | $ | 587.2 | |||||||
|
Current period change
|
(15.9 | ) | (23.9 | ) | 3.2 | (36.6 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, August 31, 2010
|
$ | 657.0 | $ | (4.3 | ) | $ | (102.1 | ) | $ | 550.6 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
15. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES:
The Company has several restructuring plans primarily within its CWNA segment and CWAE
segment, as follows:
Robert Mondavi Plan —
In January 2005, the Company announced a plan to restructure and integrate the operations of
The Robert Mondavi Corporation (“Robert Mondavi”) (the “Robert Mondavi Plan”). The objective of
the Robert Mondavi Plan is to achieve operational efficiencies and eliminate redundant costs
resulting from the December 22, 2004, acquisition of Robert Mondavi. The Robert Mondavi Plan
includes the elimination of certain employees, the consolidation of certain field sales and
administrative offices, and the termination of various contracts. The Company does not expect any
additional costs associated with the Robert Mondavi Plan to be recognized in its Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The Company expects the related cash expenditures to be completed by
February 29, 2012.
Fiscal 2006 Plan —
In fiscal 2006, the Company announced a plan to reorganize certain worldwide wine operations
and a plan to consolidate certain west coast production processes in the U.S. (collectively, the
“Fiscal 2006 Plan”). The Fiscal 2006 Plan’s principal features are to reorganize and simplify the
infrastructure and reporting structure of the Company’s global wine business and to consolidate
certain west coast production processes. This Fiscal 2006 Plan is part of the Company’s ongoing
effort to enhance its administrative, operational and production efficiencies in light of its
ongoing growth. The objective of the Fiscal 2006 Plan is to achieve greater efficiency in sales,
administrative and operational activities and to eliminate redundant costs. The Fiscal 2006 Plan
includes the termination of employment of certain employees in various locations worldwide, the
consolidation of certain worldwide wine selling and administrative functions, the consolidation of
certain warehouse and production functions, the termination of various contracts, investment in new
assets and the reconfiguration of certain existing assets. All costs and related cash expenditures
associated with the Fiscal 2006 Plan were complete as of February 28, 2009.
Vincor Plan —
In July 2006, the Company announced a plan to restructure and integrate the operations of
Vincor International Inc. (“Vincor”) (the “Vincor Plan”). The objective of the Vincor Plan is to
achieve operational efficiencies and eliminate redundant costs resulting from the June 2006 Vincor
acquisition, as well as to achieve greater efficiency in sales, marketing, administrative and
operational activities. The Vincor Plan includes the elimination of certain employment
redundancies, primarily in the U.S., U.K. and Australia, and the termination of various contracts.
The Company does not expect any additional costs associated with the Vincor Plan to be recognized
in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company expects the related cash expenditures to
be completed by February 29, 2012.
Fiscal 2007 Wine Plan —
In August 2006, the Company announced a plan to invest in new distribution and bottling
facilities in the U.K. and to streamline certain Australian wine operations (collectively, the
“Fiscal 2007 Wine Plan”). The U.K. portion of the plan includes new investments in property, plant
and equipment and certain disposals of property, plant and equipment and is expected to increase
wine bottling capacity and efficiency and reduce costs of transport, production and distribution.
The U.K. portion of the plan also includes costs for employee terminations. The Australian portion
of the plan includes the buy-out of certain grape supply and processing contracts and the sale of
certain property, plant and equipment. The initiatives are part of the Company’s ongoing efforts
to maximize asset utilization, further reduce costs and improve long-term return on invested
capital throughout its international operations. The Company does not expect any additional costs
associated with the Fiscal 2007 Wine Plan to be recognized in its Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The related cash expenditures associated with the Fiscal 2007 Wine Plan were
substantially complete by February 28, 2010.
23
Table of Contents
Fiscal 2008 Plan —
In November 2007, the Company initiated its plans to streamline certain of its international
operations, including the consolidation of certain winemaking and packaging operations in
Australia, the buy-out of certain grape processing and wine storage contracts in Australia,
equipment relocation costs in Australia, and certain employee termination costs. In addition, the
Company incurred certain other restructuring charges during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 in
connection with the consolidation of certain spirits production processes in the U.S. In January
2008, the Company announced its plans to streamline certain of its operations in the U.S.,
primarily in connection with the restructuring and integration of the operations acquired in the
Beam Wine Estates, Inc. (“BWE”) acquisition. These initiatives are collectively referred to as the
Fiscal 2008 Plan. The Fiscal 2008 Plan is part of the Company’s ongoing efforts to maximize asset
utilization, further reduce costs and improve long-term return on invested capital throughout its
domestic and international operations. The Company expects all costs associated with the Fiscal
2008 Plan to be recognized in its Consolidated Statements of Operations by February 29, 2012, with
the related cash expenditures to be substantially completed by February 29, 2012, as well.
Australian Initiative —
In August 2008, the Company announced a plan to sell certain assets and implement operational
changes designed to improve the efficiencies and returns associated with the Australian business,
primarily by consolidating certain winemaking and packaging operations and reducing the Company’s
overall grape supply due to reduced capacity needs resulting from a streamlining of the Company’s
product portfolio (the “Australian Initiative”).
The Australian Initiative includes the planned sale of three wineries and more than 20
vineyard properties, a streamlining of the Company’s wine product portfolio and production
footprint, the buy-out and/or renegotiation of certain grape supply and other contracts, equipment
relocations and costs for employee terminations. In connection with the Australian Initiative, the
Company recorded restructuring charges on its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years
ended February 28, 2010, and February 28, 2009, of $13.4 million and $46.5 million, respectively,
which represented noncash charges related to the write-down of property, plant and equipment, net,
held for sale. Included in the Company’s restructuring charges on its Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the six months and three months ended August 31, 2010, is $5.8 million of noncash
charges related to the write-down of property, plant and equipment, net, held for sale (which are
excluded from the restructuring liability rollforward table below). As of August 31, 2010, the
Company’s CWAE segment had $23.0 million of Australian assets held for sale which are included in
property, plant and equipment, net on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company
expects all costs associated with the Australian Initiative to be recognized in its Consolidated
Statements of Operations by February 28, 2011, with the related cash expenditures to be
substantially completed by February 28, 2011, as well.
Fiscal 2010 Global Initiative —
In April 2009, the Company announced its plan to simplify its business, increase efficiencies
and reduce its cost structure on a global basis (the “Global Initiative”). The Global Initiative
includes an approximately five percent reduction in the Company’s global workforce and the closing
of certain office, production and warehouse facilities. In addition, the Global Initiative
includes the termination of certain contracts, and a streamlining of the Company’s production
footprint and sales and administrative organizations. Lastly, the Global Initiative includes other
non-material restructuring activities primarily in connection with the consolidation of the
Company’s remaining spirits business into its North American wine business following the March 2009
divestiture of its value spirits business. This initiative is part of the Company’s ongoing
efforts to maximize asset utilization, reduce costs and improve long-term return on invested
capital throughout the Company’s operations. The Company expects substantially all costs
associated with the Global Initiative to be recognized in its Consolidated Statements of Operations
by February 29, 2012, with the related cash expenditures to be substantially completed by February
28, 2013.
24
Table of Contents
Restructuring charges consist of employee termination benefit costs, contract termination
costs and other associated costs. Employee termination benefit costs are accounted for under the
FASB guidance for compensation — nonretirement postemployment benefits, as the Company has had
several restructuring programs which have provided employee termination benefits in the past. The
Company includes employee severance, related payroll benefit costs (such as costs to provide
continuing health insurance) and outplacement services as employee termination benefit costs.
Contract termination costs, and other associated costs including, but not limited to, facility
consolidation and relocation costs, are accounted for under the FASB guidance for exit or disposal
cost obligations. Contract termination costs are costs to terminate a contract that is not a
capital lease, including costs to terminate the contract before the end of its term or costs that
will continue to be incurred under the contract for its remaining term without economic benefit to
the entity. The Company includes costs to terminate certain operating leases for buildings,
computer and IT equipment, and costs to terminate contracts, including distributor contracts and
contracts for long-term purchase commitments, as contract termination costs. Other associated
costs include, but are not limited to, costs to consolidate or close facilities and relocate
employees. The Company includes employee relocation costs and equipment relocation costs as other
associated costs.
Details of each plan for which the Company expects to incur additional costs are presented
separately in the following table. Plans for which exit activities were completed prior to March
1, 2010, are reported below under “Other Plans.” These plans include the Fiscal 2007 Wine Plan,
the Vincor Plan, the Fiscal 2006 Plan, the Robert Mondavi Plan and certain other immaterial
restructuring activities.
| Fiscal | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Global | Australian | 2008 | Other | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Initiative | Initiative | Plan | Plans | Total | |||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring liability, February 28, 2010
|
$ | 8.9 | $ | — | $ | 4.0 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 14.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination benefit costs
|
4.2 | — | — | — | 4.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Contract termination costs
|
— | — | — | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Facility consolidation/relocation costs
|
0.6 | — | — | — | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges, May 31, 2010
|
4.8 | — | — | 0.1 | 4.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination benefit costs
|
6.4 | 0.5 | — | — | 6.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
Contract termination costs
|
0.5 | — | — | — | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Facility consolidation/relocation costs
|
0.5 | — | — | — | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges, August 31, 2010
|
7.4 | 0.5 | — | — | 7.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total restructuring charges
|
12.2 | 0.5 | — | 0.1 | 12.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash expenditures
|
(7.4 | ) | — | (1.1 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (9.5 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
— | — | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring liability, August 31, 2010
|
$ | 13.7 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 3.0 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 18.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
In connection with the Company’s BWE acquisition, Vincor acquisition and Robert Mondavi
acquisition, the Company accrued $24.7 million, $37.7 million and $50.5 million of liabilities for
exit costs, respectively, as of the respective acquisition date. As of August 31, 2010, the
balances of the BWE, Vincor and Robert Mondavi purchase accounting accruals were $2.9 million, $0.3
million and $0.6 million, respectively. As of February 28, 2010, the balances of the BWE, Vincor
and Robert Mondavi purchase accounting accruals were $3.9 million, $0.3 million and $1.2 million,
respectively.
25
Table of Contents
For the six months and three months ended August 31, 2010, employee termination benefit costs
include a reversal of prior accruals of $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, associated
with the Global Initiative. For the six months ended August 31, 2009, employee termination benefit
costs include a reversal of prior accruals of $1.0 million associated with the Fiscal 2008 Plan and
other immaterial restructuring activities.
The following table presents a summary of restructuring charges and other costs incurred in
connection with the Company’s restructuring activities, including a summary of amounts incurred by
each of the Company’s reportable segments:
| Global | Australian |
Fiscal
2008 |
Other | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Initiative | Initiative | Plan | Plans | Total | |||||||||||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 12.2 | $ | 6.3 | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | $ | 18.6 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation/inventory write-down/other costs (cost of product sold)
|
1.1 | — | — | — | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Asset write-down/other costs/acquisition-related integration costs (selling,
general and administrative expenses)
|
2.7 | — | 0.2 | — | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total other costs
|
3.8 | — | 0.2 | — | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total costs
|
$ | 16.0 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 22.6 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Costs by Reportable Segment:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 1.7 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | $ | 1.8 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
3.4 | — | 0.2 | — | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWNA
|
$ | 5.1 | $ | — | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 5.4 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 10.5 | $ | 6.3 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 16.8 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
0.3 | — | — | — | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWAE
|
$ | 10.8 | $ | 6.3 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 17.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
0.1 | — | — | — | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Corporate Operations and Other
|
$ | 0.1 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the
Six Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 21.0 | $ | 1.4 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 22.1 | ||||||||
|
Other costs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation/inventory write-down/other costs (cost of product sold)
|
7.3 | 1.7 | — | 8.8 | 17.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
Asset write-down/other costs/acquisition-related integration costs (selling,
general and administrative expenses)
|
21.7 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 24.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total other costs
|
29.0 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 9.4 | 42.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total costs
|
$ | 50.0 | $ | 4.8 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 9.2 | $ | 64.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
26
Table of Contents
| Global | Australian |
Fiscal
2008 |
Other | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Initiative | Initiative | Plan | Plans | Total | |||||||||||||||
|
Total Costs by Reportable Segment:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 10.9 | $ | — | $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 10.4 | ||||||||
|
Other costs
|
24.1 | — | 0.2 | 0.4 | 24.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWNA
|
$ | 35.0 | $ | — | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 0.2 | $ | 35.1 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 8.2 | $ | 1.4 | $ | 0.2 | $ | — | $ | 9.8 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
1.7 | 3.4 | — | 9.0 | 14.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWAE
|
$ | 9.9 | $ | 4.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 23.9 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 1.9 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1.9 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
3.2 | — | — | — | 3.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Corporate Operations and Other
|
$ | 5.1 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 7.4 | $ | 6.3 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 13.7 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation/inventory write-down/other costs (cost of product sold)
|
0.1 | — | — | — | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Asset write-down/other costs/acquisition-related integration costs (selling,
general and administrative expenses)
|
1.8 | — | 0.1 | 1.0 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total other costs
|
1.9 | — | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total costs
|
$ | 9.3 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 1.0 | $ | 16.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Costs by Reportable Segment:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 1.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1.0 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
1.7 | — | 0.1 | — | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWNA
|
$ | 2.7 | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | $ | — | $ | 2.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 6.4 | $ | 6.3 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 12.7 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
0.1 | — | — | 1.0 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWAE
|
$ | 6.5 | $ | 6.3 | $ | — | $ | 1.0 | $ | 13.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
0.1 | — | — | — | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Corporate Operations and Other
|
$ | 0.1 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 3.1 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 0.2 | $ | — | $ | 3.2 | |||||||||
|
Other costs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation/inventory write-down/other costs (cost of product sold)
|
7.2 | 0.5 | — | 5.3 | 13.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Asset write-down/other costs/acquisition-related integration costs (selling,
general and administrative expenses)
|
8.5 | 1.2 | — | 0.5 | 10.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total other costs
|
15.7 | 1.7 | — | 5.8 | 23.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total costs
|
$ | 18.8 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 5.8 | $ | 26.4 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
27
Table of Contents
| Global | Australian |
Fiscal
2008 |
Other | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Initiative | Initiative | Plan | Plans | Total | |||||||||||||||
|
Total Costs by Reportable Segment:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 0.8 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.8 | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
13.9 | — | — | — | 13.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWNA
|
$ | 14.7 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 2.3 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 0.2 | $ | — | $ | 2.4 | |||||||||
|
Other costs
|
1.2 | 1.7 | — | 5.8 | 8.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWAE
|
$ | 3.5 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 5.8 | $ | 11.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
0.6 | — | — | — | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Corporate Operations and Other
|
$ | 0.6 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.6 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
A summary of restructuring charges and other costs incurred since inception for each
plan, as well as total expected costs for each plan, are presented in the following table:
| Fiscal | ||||||||||||||||
| Global | Australian | 2008 | Other | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Initiative | Initiative | Plan | Plans | ||||||||||||
|
Costs incurred to date
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination benefit costs
|
$ | 35.0 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 8.7 | $ | 42.0 | ||||||||
|
Contract termination costs
|
4.2 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 25.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Facility consolidation/relocation costs
|
2.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Impairment charges on assets held for sale,
net of gains on sales of assets held for
sale
|
— | 65.7 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total restructuring charges
|
41.4 | 80.3 | 11.2 | 68.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Other costs:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation/inventory
write-down/other costs (cost of product
sold)
|
12.6 | 59.2 | 17.9 | 46.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Asset write-down/other
costs/acquisition-related integration costs
(selling, general and administrative
expenses)
|
37.6 | 6.9 | 16.1 | 97.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Asset impairment (impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets)
|
— | 21.8 | 7.4 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total other costs
|
50.2 | 87.9 | 41.4 | 144.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total costs incurred to date
|
$ | 91.6 | $ | 168.2 | $ | 52.6 | $ | 213.0 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Costs Incurred to Date by Reportable Segment:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 17.8 | $ | — | $ | 7.1 | $ | 24.2 | ||||||||
|
Other costs
|
39.1 | — | 34.2 | 68.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWNA
|
$ | 56.9 | $ | — | $ | 41.3 | $ | 92.4 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
28
Table of Contents
| Fiscal | ||||||||||||||||
| Global | Australian | 2008 | Other | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Initiative | Initiative | Plan | Plans | ||||||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 20.6 | $ | 80.3 | $ | 4.1 | $ | 42.8 | ||||||||
|
Other costs
|
6.1 | 87.9 | 7.0 | 73.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWAE
|
$ | 26.7 | $ | 168.2 | $ | 11.1 | $ | 115.8 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 3.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1.9 | ||||||||
|
Other costs
|
5.0 | — | 0.2 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Corporate Operations and Other
|
$ | 8.0 | $ | — | $ | 0.2 | $ | 4.8 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total expected costs
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Employee termination benefit costs
|
$ | 38.8 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 8.7 | $ | 42.0 | ||||||||
|
Contract termination costs
|
12.4 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 25.2 | ||||||||||||
|
Facility consolidation/relocation costs
|
4.3 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
|
Impairment charges on assets held for sale,
net of gains on sales of assets held for
sale
|
— | 65.7 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total restructuring charges
|
55.5 | 80.6 | 13.0 | 68.9 | ||||||||||||
|
Other costs:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation/inventory
write-down/other costs (cost of product
sold)
|
12.7 | 59.2 | 17.9 | 46.1 | ||||||||||||
|
Asset write-down/other
costs/acquisition-related integration costs
(selling, general and administrative
expenses)
|
42.1 | 7.0 | 16.5 | 97.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Asset impairment (impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets)
|
— | 21.8 | 7.4 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total other costs
|
54.8 | 88.0 | 41.8 | 144.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total expected costs
|
$ | 110.3 | $ | 168.6 | $ | 54.8 | $ | 213.0 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Expected Costs by Reportable Segment:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 24.5 | $ | — | $ | 7.1 | $ | 24.2 | ||||||||
|
Other costs
|
41.0 | — | 34.5 | 68.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWNA
|
$ | 65.5 | $ | — | $ | 41.6 | $ | 92.4 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 28.0 | $ | 80.6 | $ | 5.9 | $ | 42.8 | ||||||||
|
Other costs
|
8.8 | 88.0 | 7.1 | 73.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total CWAE
|
$ | 36.8 | $ | 168.6 | $ | 13.0 | $ | 115.8 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
$ | 3.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1.9 | ||||||||
|
Other costs
|
5.0 | — | 0.2 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Corporate Operations and Other
|
$ | 8.0 | $ | — | $ | 0.2 | $ | 4.8 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
29
Table of Contents
16. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
The following information sets forth the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of August
31, 2010, and February 28, 2010, the condensed consolidating statements of operations for the six
months and three months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, and the condensed consolidating
statements of cash flows for the six months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, for the
Company, the parent company, the combined subsidiaries of the Company which guarantee the Company’s
senior notes (“Subsidiary Guarantors”) and the combined subsidiaries of the Company which are not
Subsidiary Guarantors (primarily foreign subsidiaries) (“Subsidiary Nonguarantors”). The
Subsidiary Guarantors are wholly-owned and the guarantees are full, unconditional, joint and
several obligations of each of the Subsidiary Guarantors. Separate financial statements for the
Subsidiary Guarantors of the Company are not presented because the Company has determined that such
financial statements would not be material to investors. The accounting policies of the parent
company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Subsidiary Nonguarantors are the same as those described
for the Company in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Note 1 to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, and include the recently adopted accounting guidance described
in Note 2 herein. There are no restrictions on the ability of the Subsidiary Guarantors to
transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.
| Parent | Subsidiary | Subsidiary | ||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Company | Guarantors | Nonguarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at August 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments
|
$ | 0.2 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 12.5 | $ | — | $ | 13.9 | ||||||||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
382.8 | 27.3 | 310.6 | — | 720.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Inventories
|
119.2 | 894.7 | 719.0 | (10.5 | ) | 1,722.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
14.5 | 56.6 | 30.3 | 1.6 | 103.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Intercompany (payable) receivable
|
(485.2 | ) | 264.5 | 220.7 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
31.5 | 1,244.3 | 1,293.1 | (8.9 | ) | 2,560.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
93.1 | 768.7 | 667.2 | — | 1,529.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
6,344.2 | 127.8 | — | (6,472.0 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
— | 1,985.9 | 580.2 | — | 2,566.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
— | 680.9 | 239.2 | — | 920.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other assets, net
|
39.3 | 203.0 | 73.3 | (13.7 | ) | 301.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 6,508.1 | $ | 5,010.6 | $ | 2,853.0 | $ | (6,494.6 | ) | $ | 7,877.1 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notes payable to banks
|
$ | 277.0 | $ | — | $ | 70.0 | $ | — | $ | 347.0 | ||||||||||
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
306.8 | 1.3 | 0.6 | — | 308.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
9.7 | 114.2 | 129.6 | — | 253.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Accrued excise taxes
|
18.5 | 0.7 | 38.5 | — | 57.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other accrued expenses and
liabilities
|
226.7 | 79.7 | 178.2 | (1.8 | ) | 482.8 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
838.7 | 195.9 | 416.9 | (1.8 | ) | 1,449.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
3,119.3 | 7.8 | 0.6 | — | 3,127.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
— | 487.2 | 70.5 | (13.7 | ) | 544.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
120.2 | 64.2 | 141.4 | — | 325.8 | |||||||||||||||
30
Table of Contents
| Parent | Subsidiary | Subsidiary | ||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Company | Guarantors | Nonguarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred stock
|
— | 9.0 | 1,460.5 | (1,469.5 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Class A and Class B Convertible
Common Stock
|
2.6 | 100.7 | 184.0 | (284.7 | ) | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,538.4 | 1,323.6 | 1,269.0 | (2,592.6 | ) | 1,538.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
1,243.2 | 2,805.0 | (1,297.5 | ) | (1,507.5 | ) | 1,243.2 | |||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
550.6 | 17.2 | 607.6 | (624.8 | ) | 550.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Treasury stock
|
(904.9 | ) | — | — | — | (904.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
2,429.9 | 4,255.5 | 2,223.6 | (6,479.1 | ) | 2,429.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’
equity
|
$ | 6,508.1 | $ | 5,010.6 | $ | 2,853.0 | $ | (6,494.6 | ) | $ | 7,877.1 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at February 28, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments
|
$ | 0.3 | $ | 3.3 | $ | 39.9 | $ | — | $ | 43.5 | ||||||||||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
219.5 | 22.6 | 272.6 | — | 514.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Inventories
|
119.8 | 1,017.5 | 754.0 | (11.4 | ) | 1,879.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
18.5 | 65.2 | 38.0 | 29.3 | 151.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Intercompany (payable) receivable
|
(68.6 | ) | (132.1 | ) | 200.7 | — | — | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
289.5 | 976.5 | 1,305.2 | 17.9 | 2,589.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
71.8 | 784.4 | 711.0 | — | 1,567.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
6,191.0 | 130.8 | — | (6,321.8 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
— | 1,985.9 | 584.7 | — | 2,570.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
— | 682.8 | 242.2 | — | 925.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other assets, net
|
104.7 | 236.3 | 108.2 | (6.8 | ) | 442.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 6,657.0 | $ | 4,796.7 | $ | 2,951.3 | $ | (6,310.7 | ) | $ | 8,094.3 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notes payable to banks
|
$ | 289.3 | $ | — | $ | 81.9 | $ | — | $ | 371.2 | ||||||||||
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
172.7 | 1.3 | 13.2 | — | 187.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
14.5 | 104.6 | 149.7 | — | 268.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
Accrued excise taxes
|
8.3 | — | 35.5 | — | 43.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other accrued expenses and
liabilities
|
190.2 | 85.3 | 201.0 | 25.1 | 501.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
675.0 | 191.2 | 481.3 | 25.1 | 1,372.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
3,270.9 | 5.6 | 0.6 | — | 3,277.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
— | 475.5 | 67.5 | (6.8 | ) | 536.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
134.8 | 47.7 | 149.6 | — | 332.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred stock
|
— | 9.0 | 1,430.9 | (1,439.9 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Class A and Class B Convertible
Common Stock
|
2.6 | 100.7 | 184.0 | (284.7 | ) | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,493.2 | 1,323.6 | 1,269.0 | (2,592.6 | ) | 1,493.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
1,102.8 | 2,611.0 | (1,260.8 | ) | (1,350.2 | ) | 1,102.8 | |||||||||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
587.2 | 32.4 | 629.2 | (661.6 | ) | 587.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Treasury stock
|
(609.5 | ) | — | — | — | (609.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
2,576.3 | 4,076.7 | 2,252.3 | (6,329.0 | ) | 2,576.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’
equity
|
$ | 6,657.0 | $ | 4,796.7 | $ | 2,951.3 | $ | (6,310.7 | ) | $ | 8,094.3 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
31
Table of Contents
| Parent | Subsidiary | Subsidiary | ||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Company | Guarantors | Nonguarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended August 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$ | 335.4 | $ | 929.1 | $ | 973.4 | $ | (204.8 | ) | $ | 2,033.1 | |||||||||
|
Less — excise taxes
|
(56.6 | ) | (53.8 | ) | (272.4 | ) | — | (382.8 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
278.8 | 875.3 | 701.0 | (204.8 | ) | 1,650.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cost of product sold
|
(135.8 | ) | (554.9 | ) | (532.8 | ) | 157.4 | (1,066.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
143.0 | 320.4 | 168.2 | (47.4 | ) | 584.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
(146.6 | ) | (120.2 | ) | (118.6 | ) | 49.3 | (336.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
— | (1.8 | ) | (16.8 | ) | — | (18.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(3.6 | ) | 198.4 | 32.8 | 1.9 | 229.5 | ||||||||||||||
|
Equity in earnings of equity method
investees and subsidiaries
|
203.0 | 116.8 | 1.6 | (200.5 | ) | 120.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
(107.0 | ) | 6.8 | 1.4 | — | (98.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
92.4 | 322.0 | 35.8 | (198.6 | ) | 251.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Benefit from (provision for) income
taxes
|
48.0 | (128.4 | ) | (29.4 | ) | (1.4 | ) | (111.2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 140.4 | $ | 193.6 | $ | 6.4 | $ | (200.0 | ) | $ | 140.4 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended August 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$ | 285.8 | $ | 940.4 | $ | 1,020.6 | $ | (152.3 | ) | $ | 2,094.5 | |||||||||
|
Less — excise taxes
|
(74.2 | ) | (57.1 | ) | (294.8 | ) | — | (426.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
211.6 | 883.3 | 725.8 | (152.3 | ) | 1,668.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cost of product sold
|
(101.8 | ) | (524.4 | ) | (563.6 | ) | 99.7 | (1,090.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
109.8 | 358.9 | 162.2 | (52.6 | ) | 578.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
(118.4 | ) | (139.4 | ) | (125.1 | ) | 51.5 | (331.4 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
0.4 | (11.3 | ) | (11.2 | ) | — | (22.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(8.2 | ) | 208.2 | 25.9 | (1.1 | ) | 224.8 | |||||||||||||
|
Equity in earnings of equity method
investees and subsidiaries
|
203.8 | 138.4 | 1.9 | (208.1 | ) | 136.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(111.8 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (3.1 | ) | — | (136.5 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
83.8 | 325.0 | 24.7 | (209.2 | ) | 224.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
Benefit from (provision for) income
taxes
|
22.4 | (161.5 | ) | 20.1 | 0.9 | (118.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 106.2 | $ | 163.5 | $ | 44.8 | $ | (208.3 | ) | $ | 106.2 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended August 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$ | 167.1 | $ | 497.2 | $ | 499.5 | $ | (106.9 | ) | $ | 1,056.9 | |||||||||
|
Less — excise taxes
|
(27.8 | ) | (29.6 | ) | (136.7 | ) | — | (194.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
139.3 | 467.6 | 362.8 | (106.9 | ) | 862.8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cost of product sold
|
(68.3 | ) | (288.7 | ) | (275.3 | ) | 83.7 | (548.6 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
71.0 | 178.9 | 87.5 | (23.2 | ) | 314.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
(73.2 | ) | (62.1 | ) | (56.6 | ) | 24.6 | (167.3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
— | (1.3 | ) | (12.4 | ) | — | (13.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(2.2 | ) | 115.5 | 18.5 | 1.4 | 133.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Equity in earnings of equity method
investees and subsidiaries
|
116.0 | 67.2 | 1.0 | (117.8 | ) | 66.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
(55.6 | ) | 4.7 | 0.6 | — | (50.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
58.2 | 187.4 | 20.1 | (116.4 | ) | 149.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
Benefit from (provision for) income
taxes
|
33.1 | (73.5 | ) | (16.3 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (58.0 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 91.3 | $ | 113.9 | $ | 3.8 | $ | (117.7 | ) | $ | 91.3 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
32
Table of Contents
| Parent | Subsidiary | Subsidiary | ||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Company | Guarantors | Nonguarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
$ | 102.3 | $ | 504.5 | $ | 536.4 | $ | (52.5 | ) | $ | 1,090.7 | |||||||||
|
Less — excise taxes
|
(27.7 | ) | (33.7 | ) | (152.5 | ) | — | (213.9 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
74.6 | 470.8 | 383.9 | (52.5 | ) | 876.8 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cost of product sold
|
(23.7 | ) | (275.8 | ) | (294.1 | ) | 26.4 | (567.2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
50.9 | 195.0 | 89.8 | (26.1 | ) | 309.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
(56.8 | ) | (66.4 | ) | (70.4 | ) | 27.3 | (166.3 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Restructuring charges
|
— | (0.7 | ) | (2.5 | ) | — | (3.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating (loss) income
|
(5.9 | ) | 127.9 | 16.9 | 1.2 | 140.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
Equity in earnings of equity method
investees and subsidiaries
|
127.9 | 73.0 | 1.9 | (129.6 | ) | 73.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(51.6 | ) | (14.7 | ) | (1.8 | ) | — | (68.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
70.4 | 186.2 | 17.0 | (128.4 | ) | 145.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Benefit from (provision for) income
taxes
|
29.3 | (84.6 | ) | 9.4 | 0.4 | (45.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 99.7 | $ | 101.6 | $ | 26.4 | $ | (128.0 | ) | $ | 99.7 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended August 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
$ | (170.9 | ) | $ | 396.7 | $ | 79.9 | $ | — | $ | 305.7 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and
equipment
|
(23.2 | ) | (13.4 | ) | (6.6 | ) | — | (43.2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Investment in equity method investee
|
— | (0.1 | ) | (29.6 | ) | — | (29.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
(Repayments related to) proceeds
from sale of business
|
— | — | (1.6 | ) | — | (1.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from note receivable
|
60.0 | — | — | — | 60.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
— | 0.5 | 2.6 | — | 3.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other investing activities
|
— | — | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
36.8 | (13.0 | ) | (34.7 | ) | — | (10.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intercompany financings, net
|
444.6 | (385.2 | ) | (59.4 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
(300.0 | ) | — | — | — | (300.0 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Principal payments of long-term debt
|
(22.9 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (1.0 | ) | — | (24.5 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Net repayment of notes payable
|
(12.3 | ) | — | (11.8 | ) | — | (24.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Payment of financing costs of
long-term debt
|
(0.2 | ) | — | — | — | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Exercise of employee stock options
|
18.0 | — | — | — | 18.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment awards
|
4.7 | — | — | — | 4.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from employee stock
purchases
|
2.1 | — | — | — | 2.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
134.0 | (385.8 | ) | (72.2 | ) | — | (324.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash investments
|
— | — | (0.4 | ) | — | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
33
Table of Contents
| Parent | Subsidiary | Subsidiary | ||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Company | Guarantors | Nonguarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash investments
|
(0.1 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (27.4 | ) | — | (29.6 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments, beginning
of period
|
0.3 | 3.3 | 39.9 | — | 43.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments, end of
period
|
$ | 0.2 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 12.5 | $ | — | $ | 13.9 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended August 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
$ | (198.5 | ) | $ | 247.4 | $ | 48.5 | $ | — | $ | 97.4 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of property, plant and
equipment
|
(2.8 | ) | (41.7 | ) | (20.6 | ) | — | (65.1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Investment in equity method investee
|
— | (0.5 | ) | — | — | (0.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of business
|
— | 262.1 | 14.3 | — | 276.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
— | 0.1 | 14.4 | — | 14.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other investing activities
|
1.0 | — | 0.2 | — | 1.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
(1.8 | ) | 220.0 | 8.3 | — | 226.5 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intercompany financings, net
|
420.5 | (464.9 | ) | 44.4 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Principal payments of long-term debt
|
(261.3 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (8.0 | ) | — | (271.4 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Net proceeds from (repayment of)
notes payable
|
26.0 | — | (86.2 | ) | — | (60.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Exercise of employee stock options
|
9.0 | — | — | — | 9.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payment awards
|
2.2 | — | — | — | 2.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from employee stock
purchases
|
2.3 | — | — | — | 2.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
198.7 | (467.0 | ) | (49.8 | ) | — | (318.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash investments
|
— | — | 0.8 | — | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash investments
|
(1.6 | ) | 0.4 | 7.8 | — | 6.6 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments, beginning
of period
|
2.3 | 3.7 | 7.1 | — | 13.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash investments, end of
period
|
$ | 0.7 | $ | 4.1 | $ | 14.9 | $ | — | $ | 19.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
34
Table of Contents
17. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION:
Prior to May 1, 2010, the Company’s internal management financial reporting
consisted of two business divisions, Constellation Wines and Crown Imports. In connection with the
Company’s recent changes within its internal management structure for its U.K. and Australia
businesses, and the Company’s revised business strategy within these markets, the Company changed
its internal management financial reporting on May 1, 2010, to consist of four business divisions:
Constellation Wines North America, Constellation Wines Australia and Europe, Constellation Wines
New Zealand and Crown Imports. However, due to a number of factors, including the size of the
Constellation Wines New Zealand segment’s operations, the similarity of its economic
characteristics and long-term financial performance with that of the Constellation Wines North
America business, and the fact that the vast majority of the wine produced by the Constellation
Wines New Zealand operating segment is sold in the U.S. and Canada, the Company has aggregated the
results of this operating segment with its Constellation Wines North America operating segment to
form one reportable segment. Accordingly, beginning May 1, 2010, the Company began reporting its
operating results in four segments: Constellation Wines North America (wine and spirits) (“CWNA”),
Constellation Wines Australia and Europe (wine) (“CWAE”), Corporate Operations and Other, and Crown
Imports (imported beer). Amounts included in the Corporate Operations and Other segment consist of
costs of executive management, corporate development, corporate finance, human resources, internal
audit, investor relations, legal, public relations, global information technology and global supply
chain. Any costs incurred at the corporate office that are applicable to the segments are
allocated to the appropriate segment. The amounts included in the Corporate Operations and Other
segment are general costs that are applicable to the consolidated group and are therefore not
allocated to the other reportable segments. All costs reported within the Corporate Operations and
Other segment are not included in the chief operating decision maker’s evaluation of the operating
income performance of the other reportable segments.
The new business segments reflect how the Company’s operations are managed, how operating
performance within the Company is evaluated by senior management and the structure of its internal
financial reporting. The financial information for the six months and three months ended August
31, 2009, has been restated to conform to the new segment presentation.
In addition, the Company excludes restructuring charges and unusual items that affect
comparability from its definition of operating income for segment purposes as these items are not
reflective of normal continuing operations of the segments. The Company excludes these items as
segment operating performance and segment management compensation is evaluated based upon a
normalized segment operating income. As such, the performance measures for incentive compensation
purposes for segment management do not include the impact of these items.
35
Table of Contents
For the six months and three months ended August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, restructuring
charges and unusual items included in operating income consist of:
| For the Six Months | For the Three Months | |||||||||||||||
| Ended August 31, | Ended August 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
Cost of Product Sold
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
$ | 1.1 | $ | 14.0 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 11.1 | ||||||||
|
Flow through of inventory step-up
|
1.6 | 5.2 | 0.6 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
|
Inventory write-downs
|
— | 1.0 | — | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
— | 2.8 | — | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of Product Sold
|
2.7 | 23.0 | 0.7 | 15.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Gain on sale of nonstrategic assets
|
(1.0 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Acquisition-related integration costs
|
0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | — | ||||||||||||
|
Net gain on March 2009 sale of value
spirits business
|
— | (0.2 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Other costs
|
3.7 | 24.1 | 2.8 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses
|
2.9 | 24.0 | 2.9 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges
|
18.6 | 22.1 | 13.7 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
|
$ | 24.2 | $ | 69.1 | $ | 17.3 | $ | 28.9 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
The Company evaluates performance based on operating income of the respective business
units. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described for the Company in
the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February
28, 2010, and include the recently adopted accounting guidance described in Note 2 herein.
Segment information is as follows:
| For the Six Months | For the Three Months | |||||||||||||||
| Ended August 31, | Ended August 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
CWNA
:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Wine
|
$ | 1,132.3 | $ | 1,094.4 | $ | 600.6 | $ | 570.2 | ||||||||
|
Spirits
|
113.2 | 124.8 | 55.0 | 64.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 1,245.5 | $ | 1,219.2 | $ | 655.6 | $ | 634.9 | ||||||||
|
Segment operating income
|
$ | 313.7 | $ | 331.3 | $ | 181.2 | $ | 183.8 | ||||||||
|
Equity in losses of equity method
investees
|
$ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (1.3 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | ||||
|
Long-lived tangible assets
|
$ | 1,078.0 | $ | 1,117.6 | $ | 1,078.0 | $ | 1,117.6 | ||||||||
|
Investment in equity method investees
|
$ | 74.2 | $ | 95.2 | $ | 74.2 | $ | 95.2 | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 6,446.3 | $ | 6,571.9 | $ | 6,446.3 | $ | 6,571.9 | ||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 22.6 | $ | 32.7 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 14.9 | ||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 44.4 | $ | 53.2 | $ | 21.6 | $ | 30.0 | ||||||||
36
Table of Contents
| For the Six Months | For the Three Months | |||||||||||||||
| Ended August 31, | Ended August 31, | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
CWAE
:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Wine
|
$ | 404.8 | $ | 449.2 | $ | 207.2 | $ | 241.9 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 404.8 | $ | 449.2 | $ | 207.2 | $ | 241.9 | ||||||||
|
Segment operating (loss) income
|
$ | (6.0 | ) | $ | 4.2 | $ | (3.2 | ) | $ | 4.1 | ||||||
|
Equity in earnings of equity method investees
|
$ | 2.1 | $ | 2.2 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 1.1 | ||||||||
|
Long-lived tangible assets
|
$ | 347.6 | $ | 445.3 | $ | 347.6 | $ | 445.3 | ||||||||
|
Investment in equity method investees
|
$ | 37.6 | $ | 36.7 | $ | 37.6 | $ | 36.7 | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 1,153.4 | $ | 1,536.9 | $ | 1,153.4 | $ | 1,536.9 | ||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 2.1 | $ | 11.6 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 1.1 | ||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 15.3 | $ | 23.4 | $ | 7.5 | $ | 12.7 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Segment operating loss
|
$ | (54.0 | ) | $ | (41.6 | ) | $ | (27.5 | ) | $ | (18.9 | ) | ||||
|
Long-lived tangible assets
|
$ | 103.4 | $ | 59.6 | $ | 103.4 | $ | 59.6 | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 146.6 | $ | 176.8 | $ | 146.6 | $ | 176.8 | ||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 18.5 | $ | 20.8 | $ | 8.1 | $ | 2.0 | ||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 8.6 | $ | 6.5 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 3.2 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Crown Imports
:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 1,300.9 | $ | 1,335.5 | $ | 679.4 | $ | 696.4 | ||||||||
|
Segment operating income
|
$ | 240.1 | $ | 270.7 | $ | 131.2 | $ | 144.7 | ||||||||
|
Long-lived tangible assets
|
$ | 4.5 | $ | 5.7 | $ | 4.5 | $ | 5.7 | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 378.7 | $ | 387.6 | $ | 378.7 | $ | 387.6 | ||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 0.4 | $ | 0.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.3 | ||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 0.9 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Operating loss
|
$ | (24.2 | ) | $ | (69.1 | ) | $ | (17.3 | ) | $ | (28.9 | ) | ||||
|
Equity in losses of equity method investees
|
$ | (0.6 | ) | $ | — | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidation and Eliminations
:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | (1,300.9 | ) | $ | (1,335.5 | ) | $ | (679.4 | ) | $ | (696.4 | ) | ||||
|
Operating income
|
$ | (240.1 | ) | $ | (270.7 | ) | $ | (131.2 | ) | $ | (144.7 | ) | ||||
|
Equity in earnings of Crown Imports
|
$ | 119.6 | $ | 135.1 | $ | 65.3 | $ | 72.2 | ||||||||
|
Long-lived tangible assets
|
$ | (4.5 | ) | $ | (5.7 | ) | $ | (4.5 | ) | $ | (5.7 | ) | ||||
|
Investment in equity method investees
|
$ | 130.8 | $ | 148.3 | $ | 130.8 | $ | 148.3 | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | (247.9 | ) | $ | (239.3 | ) | $ | (247.9 | ) | $ | (239.3 | ) | ||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$ | (0.4 | ) | $ | (0.8 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | ||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | (0.9 | ) | $ | (0.5 | ) | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | ||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Net sales
|
$ | 1,650.3 | $ | 1,668.4 | $ | 862.8 | $ | 876.8 | ||||||||
|
Operating income
|
$ | 229.5 | $ | 224.8 | $ | 133.2 | $ | 140.1 | ||||||||
|
Equity in earnings of equity method investees
|
$ | 120.9 | $ | 136.0 | $ | 66.4 | $ | 73.2 | ||||||||
|
Long-lived tangible assets
|
$ | 1,529.0 | $ | 1,622.5 | $ | 1,529.0 | $ | 1,622.5 | ||||||||
|
Investment in equity method investees
|
$ | 242.6 | $ | 280.2 | $ | 242.6 | $ | 280.2 | ||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 7,877.1 | $ | 8,433.9 | $ | 7,877.1 | $ | 8,433.9 | ||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 43.2 | $ | 65.1 | $ | 17.6 | $ | 18.0 | ||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 68.3 | $ | 83.1 | $ | 33.7 | $ | 45.9 | ||||||||
37
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
The Company is the world’s leading wine company with a broad portfolio of consumer-preferred
premium wine brands complemented by spirits, imported beer and other select beverage alcohol
products. The Company continues to supply imported beer in the United States (“U.S.”) through its
investment in a joint venture with Grupo Modelo, S.A.B. de C.V. This imported beers joint venture
operates as Crown Imports LLC and is referred to hereinafter as “Crown Imports.” The Company is
the leading premium wine company in the U.S.; a leading producer and exporter of wine from
Australia and New Zealand; the leading producer and marketer of wine in Canada; and a major
supplier of beverage alcohol in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”). Through its investment in a joint
venture with Punch Taverns plc, the Company has an interest in a U.K. wholesale business (“Matthew
Clark”), which is the U.K.’s leading independent premier drinks wholesaler serving the on-trade
drinks industry.
In connection with the Company’s recent changes within its internal management structure for
its U.K. and Australia businesses, and the Company’s revised business strategy within these
markets, the Company changed its internal management financial reporting on May 1, 2010, to consist
of four business divisions: Constellation Wines North America, Constellation Wines Australia and
Europe, Constellation Wines New Zealand and Crown Imports. However, due to a number of factors,
including the size of the Constellation Wines New Zealand segment’s operations, the similarity of
its economic characteristics and long-term financial performance with that of the Constellation
Wines North America business, and the fact that the vast majority of the wine produced by the
Constellation Wines New Zealand operating segment is sold in the U.S. and Canada, the Company has
aggregated the results of this operating segment with its Constellation Wines North America
operating segment to form one reportable segment. Accordingly, beginning May 1, 2010, the Company
began reporting its operating results in four segments: Constellation Wines North America (wine
and spirits) (“CWNA”), Constellation Wines Australia and Europe (wine) (“CWAE”), Corporate
Operations and Other, and Crown Imports (imported beer). Prior to the changes noted above, the
Company’s internal management financial reporting consisted of two business divisions,
Constellation Wines and Crown Imports. Amounts included in the Corporate Operations and Other
segment consist of costs of executive management, corporate development, corporate finance, human
resources, internal audit, investor relations, legal, public relations, global information
technology and global supply chain. Any costs incurred at the corporate office that are applicable
to the segments are allocated to the appropriate segment. The amounts included in the Corporate
Operations and Other segment are general costs that are applicable to the consolidated group and
are therefore not allocated to the other reportable segments. All costs reported within the
Corporate Operations and Other segment are not included in the chief operating decision maker’s
evaluation of the operating income performance of the other reportable segments.
The new business segments reflect how the Company’s operations are managed, how operating
performance within the Company is evaluated by senior management and the structure of its internal
financial reporting. The financial information for Second Quarter 2010 and Six Months 2010 (each
as defined below) has been restated to conform to the new segment presentation.
In addition, the Company excludes restructuring charges and unusual items that
affect comparability from its definition of operating income for segment purposes as these items
are not reflective of normal continuing operations of the segments. The Company excludes these
items as segment operating performance and segment management compensation is evaluated based upon
a normalized segment operating income. As such, the performance measures for incentive
compensation purposes for segment management do not include the impact of these items.
38
Table of Contents
The Company’s business strategy in the CWNA segment is to remain focused on consumer-preferred
premium wine brands, complemented by premium spirits and imported beers. In this segment, the
Company intends to continue to focus on growing premium product categories and expects to
capitalize on its size and scale in the marketplace to profitably grow the business. During Fiscal
2010 (as defined below), the Company began implementation of a strategic project to consolidate its
U.S. distributor network in key markets and create a new go-to-market strategy designed to focus
the full power of its U.S. wine and spirits portfolio in order to improve alignment of dedicated,
selling resources which is expected to drive organic growth. The Company believes that this is the
right strategy to take in order to position the Company for future growth in a consolidating
market. Recent U.S. market trends and sales from wholesalers to retailers indicate that the
Company’s branded wine products have benefited from this new go-to-market strategy in Six Months
2011 (as defined below).
In response to the continuing competitive conditions in the U.K. and Australia, the Company’s
business strategy in the CWAE segment includes tightening of its portfolio focus, increasing
efficiencies, reducing costs and improving cash generation. This strategy is expected to assist
the Company in its efforts to effectively deal with some of the long-term challenges the Company
faces in the U.K. and Australia markets, as further described below.
The Company remains committed to its long-term financial model of growing sales, expanding
margins, increasing cash flow and reducing borrowings to achieve earnings per share growth and
improve return on invested capital.
Worldwide and domestic economies continue to experience adverse conditions, and economic and
consumer conditions in the Company’s key markets, and on a global basis, remain challenging.
Accordingly, the current competitive environment in the marketplace remains intense. The global
economic situation has or could adversely affect the Company’s major suppliers, distributors and
retailers. The inability of suppliers, distributors or retailers to conduct business or to access
liquidity could adversely impact the Company’s business and financial performance. In order to
mitigate the impact of these challenging conditions, the Company continues to focus on improving
operating efficiencies, containing costs, optimizing cash flow, reducing borrowings and increasing
return on invested capital. The Company has also maintained adequate liquidity to meet current
obligations and fund capital expenditures. However, changing conditions in the worldwide and
domestic economies could have a material impact on the Company’s business, liquidity, financial
condition and results of operations.
Marketing, sales and distribution of the Company’s products are managed on a
geographic basis in order to fully leverage leading market positions within each core market.
Market dynamics and consumer trends vary significantly across the Company’s five core markets
(U.S., Canada, New Zealand, U.K. and Australia) within the Company’s four geographic regions (North
America, New Zealand, Europe and Australia). Within North America, the Company offers a range of
beverage alcohol products across the branded wine and spirits and, through Crown Imports, imported
beer categories in the U.S. Within the Company’s remaining geographies, the Company primarily
offers branded wine.
The environment for the Company’s products is competitive in each of the Company’s core
markets. In particular, the U.K. and Australian markets are highly competitive, as further
described below. The U.K. wine market is primarily an import market with Australian wines
comprising approximately one-fifth of all wine sales in the U.K. off-premise business. The
Australian wine market is primarily a domestic market. The Company has leading share positions in
the Australian wine category in both the U.K. and Australian markets.
39
Table of Contents
Due to competitive conditions in the U.K. and Australia, it has been difficult for the Company
in recent fiscal periods to recover certain cost increases, in particular, the duty increases in
the U.K. which have been imposed at least annually for the past several years. In the U.K.,
significant consolidation at the retail level has resulted in a limited number of large retailers
controlling a significant portion of the off-premise wine business. The continuing surplus of
Australian wine has made and continues to make low cost bulk wine available to these U.K. retailers
which has allowed certain of these large retailers to create and build private label brands in the
Australian wine category. Periodically, the Company has implemented price increases in the U.K.
and Australia in an effort to cover certain cost increases, including the U.K. duty increases, and
to improve profitability; however, the concentrated retail environment, competition from private
label causing deterioration of retail pricing, foreign exchange volatility and a challenging
economic environment have all contributed to declining gross margins for the Company’s U.K. and
Australian businesses in recent periods. As discussed previously, the Company’s strategy in the
CWAE segment was revised to address some of these long-term challenges, including tightening of the
portfolio focus, increasing efficiencies, reducing costs and improving cash generation.
In Australia, the calendar 2010 grape harvest came in lower than the calendar 2009 grape
harvest. Although the calendar 2010 grape harvest came in closer to expected annual demand for
Australian wine products, an Australian bulk wine surplus remains due to the oversupply build up
from prior years. This surplus and related intense competitive conditions in the U.K. and
Australian markets are not expected to subside in the near term. In the U.S., the calendar 2010
grape harvest is expected to be slightly smaller than the calendar 2009 grape harvest. However,
the Company continues to expect the overall supply of wine to remain generally in balance with
demand within the U.S.
For the three months ended August 31, 2010 (“Second Quarter 2011”), the Company’s net sales
decreased 2% over the three months ended August 31, 2009 (“Second Quarter 2010”), primarily due to
the divestiture of the U.K. cider business (see “Divestitures in Fiscal 2010” below). Operating
income decreased 5% over the comparable prior year period primarily due to an increase in selling,
general and administrative expenses for the CWNA segment and the Corporate Operations and Other
segment for Second Quarter 2011 compared to Second Quarter 2010. Net income decreased 8% over the
comparable prior year period primarily due to the items discussed above combined with lower
interest expense partially offset by an increase in the Company’s provision for income taxes.
For the six months ended August 31, 2010 (“Six Months 2011”), the Company’s net sales
decreased 1% over the six months ended August 31, 2009 (“Six Months 2010”), primarily due to the
divestiture of the U.K. cider business, partially offset by a favorable year-over-year foreign
currency translation impact. Operating income increased 2% over the comparable prior year period
primarily due to a decrease in restructuring charges and unusual items for Six Months 2011 compared
to Six Months 2010. Net income increased 32% over the comparable prior year period primarily due
to the items discussed above combined with lower interest expense and a reduction in the Company’s
provision for income taxes.
The following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting (i)
consolidated results of operations of the Company for Second Quarter 2011 compared to Second
Quarter 2010 and Six Months 2011 compared to Six Months 2010, and (ii) financial liquidity and
capital resources for Six Months 2011. This discussion and analysis also identifies certain
restructuring charges and unusual items expected to affect consolidated results of operations of
the Company for the year ending February 28, 2011 (“Fiscal 2011”). This discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included herein and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 28, 2010 (“Fiscal 2010”).
40
Table of Contents
Equity Method Investment in Fiscal 2011
In connection with the Company’s December 2004 investment in Ruffino S.r.l.
(“Ruffino”), the Company granted separate irrevocable and unconditional options to the two other
shareholders of Ruffino to put to the Company all of the ownership interests held by these
shareholders for a price as calculated in the joint venture agreement. Each option may be
exercised during the period starting from January 1, 2010, and ending on December 31, 2010. In the
year ended February 28, 2010, the 9.9% shareholder of Ruffino notified the Company that it was
exercising the option to put its entire equity interest in Ruffino to the Company for the specified
minimum value of €23.5 million. In May 2010, the Company settled this put option through a cash
payment of €23.5 million ($29.6 million) to the 9.9% shareholder of Ruffino, thereby increasing the
Company’s equity interest in Ruffino to 49.9%. The price of the other option, which represents the
remaining 50.1% interest in Ruffino, is based upon a formula contained in the joint venture
agreement. The formula is subject to a number of variables, including future results of Ruffino.
The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the variables in the formula on the cash settlement
if the 50.1% shareholder of Ruffino were to exercise the option to put its entire equity interest
in Ruffino to the Company. Subject to the mutual agreement and understanding of the respective
rights of each of the parties to this put option, the Company currently estimates that the cash
settlement for this put option could be as much as €55 million ($70 million). As of August 31,
2010, the Company concluded that it is not probable that there is a likelihood of loss under this
contingent obligation. Therefore, no liability has been recorded by the Company related to this
contingent obligation and an estimate of any loss is currently not estimable. As of August 31,
2010, the Company’s investment in Ruffino was $4.1 million.
Divestitures in Fiscal 2010
U.K. Cider Business
In January 2010, the Company sold its U.K. cider business for cash proceeds of £43.9
million ($71.6 million), net of direct costs to sell. This transaction is consistent with the
Company’s strategic focus on premium higher-growth, higher-margin wine, beer and spirits brands.
In connection with this divestiture, the Company’s CWAE segment recorded a gain of $11.2 million in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
Value Spirits Business
In March 2009, the Company sold its value spirits business for $336.4 million, net of direct
costs to sell. The Company received $276.4 million, net of direct costs to sell, in cash proceeds
and a note receivable for $60.0 million in connection with this divestiture. In the first quarter
of fiscal 2011, the Company received full payment of the note receivable. The Company retained
certain premium spirits brands, including SVEDKA Vodka, Black Velvet Canadian Whisky and Paul
Masson Grande Amber Brandy. This transaction is consistent with the Company’s strategic focus on
premium, higher growth and higher margin brands in its portfolio. In connection with the
classification of this business as an asset group held for sale as of February 28, 2009, the
Company’s CWNA segment recorded a loss of $15.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009,
primarily related to asset impairments. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company’s CWNA
segment recognized a net gain of $0.2 million, which included a gain on settlement of a
postretirement obligation of $1.0 million, partially offset by an additional loss of $0.8 million.
This net gain is included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
41
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Second Quarter 2011 Compared to Second Quarter 2010
Net Sales
The following table sets forth the net sales (in millions of dollars) by reportable segment of
the Company for Second Quarter 2011 and Second Quarter 2010.
| Second | Second | |||||||||||
| Quarter | Quarter | % Increase | ||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||
|
Wine
|
$ | 600.6 | $ | 570.2 | 5 | % | ||||||
|
Spirits
|
55.0 | 64.7 | (15 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
CWNA net sales
|
655.6 | 634.9 | 3 | % | ||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||
|
Wine
|
207.2 | 241.9 | (14 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
CWAE net sales
|
207.2 | 241.9 | (14 | )% | ||||||||
|
Crown Imports net sales
|
679.4 | 696.4 | (2 | )% | ||||||||
|
Consolidations and eliminations
|
(679.4 | ) | (696.4 | ) | 2 | % | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Net Sales
|
$ | 862.8 | $ | 876.8 | (2 | )% | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Net sales for Second Quarter 2011 decreased to $862.8 million from $876.8 million for
Second Quarter 2010, a decrease of $14.0 million, or (2%). This decrease resulted primarily from
the divestiture of the U.K. cider business of $37.1 million, partially offset by an increase in
U.S. branded wine net sales primarily due to favorable product mix shift and volume growth.
Constellation Wines North America
Net sales for CWNA increased to $655.6 million for Second Quarter 2011 from $634.9 million for
Second Quarter 2010, an increase of $20.7 million, or 3%. Wine net sales increased $30.4 million
primarily due to favorable product mix shift and volume growth in the U.S. branded wine portfolio
due largely to certain U.S. distributor contractual commitments, and a favorable year-over-year
foreign currency translation impact of $7.8 million, partially offset by increased U.S. promotional
spend. Spirits net sales decreased $9.7 million primarily due to lower volumes of SVEDKA Vodka as
compared to the prior year’s strong volume growth in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 which
occurred in connection with the U.S. distributor consolidation transition.
Constellation Wines Australia and Europe
Net sales for CWAE decreased to $207.2 million for Second Quarter 2011 from $241.9 million for
Second Quarter 2010, a decrease of $34.7 million, or (14%). Wine net sales decreased $34.7 million
primarily due to a decrease in net sales of $37.1 million in connection with the divestiture of the
U.K. cider business combined with an unfavorable year-over-year foreign currency translation impact
of $4.8 million, partially offset by volume growth of lower margin wine in the U.K.
Crown Imports
As this segment is eliminated in consolidation, see “Equity in Earnings of Equity Method
Investees” below for a discussion of Crown Imports’ net sales, gross profit, selling, general and
administrative expenses, and operating income.
42
Table of Contents
Gross Profit
The Company’s gross profit increased to $314.2 million for Second Quarter 2011 from $309.6
million for Second Quarter 2010, an increase of $4.6 million, or 1%. The CWNA segment’s gross
profit increased $6.6 million primarily due to the favorable product mix shift and volume growth in
the U.S. branded wine portfolio and a favorable foreign currency translation impact of $3.4
million, partially offset by the increased U.S. promotional spend and the flow through of higher
calendar 2008 U.S. grape costs. The CWAE segment’s gross profit decreased $16.8 million primarily
due to the divestiture of the U.K. cider business. In addition, unusual items, which consist of
certain amounts that are excluded by management in their evaluation of the results of each
operating segment, were lower by $14.8 million in Second Quarter 2011 versus Second Quarter 2010
primarily due to (i) a decrease in accelerated depreciation of $11.0 million associated with
certain restructuring programs and (ii) a decrease in the flow through of inventory step-up of
$1.9 million associated primarily with the December 2007 acquisition of Beam Wine Estates, Inc.
(“BWE”). Gross profit as a percent of net sales increased to 36.4% for Second Quarter 2011 from
35.3% for Second Quarter 2010 primarily due to (i) the decrease in unusual items, (ii) volume
growth of higher-margin U.S. branded wine, and (iii) divestiture of the U.K. cider business;
partially offset by (i) the increased U.S. promotional spend, (ii) the flow through of the higher
calendar 2008 U.S. grape costs, and (iii) the volume growth of lower margin wine in the U.K.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $167.3 million for Second Quarter
2011 from $166.3 million for Second Quarter 2010, an increase of $1.0 million, or 1%. This
increase is due to increases of $9.2 million in the CWNA segment and $8.6 million in the Corporate
Operations and Other segment, partially offset by decreases of $9.5 million in the CWAE segment and
$7.3 million of unusual items, which consist of certain amounts that are excluded by management in
their evaluation of the results of each operating segment. The increase in the CWNA segment’s
selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increases in general and
administrative expenses of $4.5 million and selling expenses of $3.7 million. The increase in
general and administrative expenses is primarily due to the Company’s initiative to implement a
comprehensive, multi-year program to strengthen and enhance the Company’s global business
capabilities and processes through the creation of an integrated technology platform to improve the
accessibility of information and visibility of global data (“Project Fusion”) and higher annual
management incentive compensation expense. The increase in selling expenses is primarily due to
higher annual management incentive compensation expense. The increase in the Corporate Operations
and Other segment’s selling, general and administrative expenses is due to an increase in general
and administrative expenses resulting primarily from (i) the overlap of an insurance benefit
recognized in the prior year and (ii) higher annual management incentive compensation expense.
The decrease in the CWAE segment’s selling, general and administrative expense is primarily due to
the divestiture of the U.K. cider business. The decrease in unusual items is primarily due to the
recognition in Second Quarter 2010 of $8.5 million of other costs in connection with the Company’s
plan (announced in April 2009) to simplify its business, increase efficiencies and reduce its cost
structure on a global basis (the “Global Initiative”).
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales increased to 19.4% for
Second Quarter 2011 as compared to 19.0% for Second Quarter 2010 primarily due to the factors
discussed above combined with the increased U.S. promotional spend.
43
Table of Contents
Restructuring Charges
The Company recorded $13.7 million of restructuring charges for Second Quarter 2011 associated
with the Company’s Global Initiative and the Company’s plan (announced in August 2008) to sell
certain assets and implement operational changes designed to improve the efficiencies and returns
associated with the Australian business, primarily by consolidating certain winemaking and
packaging operations and reducing the Company’s overall grape supply due to reduced capacity needs
resulting from a streamlining of the Company’s product portfolio (the “Australian Initiative”).
Restructuring charges included $6.9 million of employee termination benefit costs, $0.5 million of
contract termination costs, $0.5 million of facility consolidation/relocation costs and $5.8
million of impairment charges on assets held for sale in Australia. The Company recorded $3.2
million of restructuring charges for Second Quarter 2010 associated primarily with the Company’s
Global Initiative.
In addition, the Company incurred additional costs for Second Quarter 2011 and Second Quarter
2010 in connection with the Company’s restructuring and acquisition-related integration plans.
Total costs incurred in connection with these plans for Second Quarter 2011 and Second Quarter 2010
are as follows:
| Second | Second | |||||||
| Quarter | Quarter | |||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|
Cost of
Product Sold
|
||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
$ | 0.1 | $ | 11.1 | ||||
|
Inventory write-downs
|
$ | — | $ | 0.6 | ||||
|
Other
|
$ | — | $ | 1.3 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
||||||||
|
Acquisition-related integration costs
|
$ | 0.1 | $ | — | ||||
|
Other costs
|
$ | 2.8 | $ | 10.2 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges
|
$ | 13.7 | $ | 3.2 | ||||
For a discussion of costs expected to be incurred for Fiscal 2011 in connection with the
Company’s restructuring and acquisition-related integration plans, see “Six Months 2011 Compared to
Six Months 2010 — Restructuring Charges” below.
Operating Income
The following table sets forth the operating income (loss) (in millions of dollars) by
reportable segment of the Company for Second Quarter 2011 and Second Quarter 2010.
| Second | Second | |||||||||||
| Quarter | Quarter | % (Decrease) | ||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | Increase | ||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
$ | 181.2 | $ | 183.8 | (1 | )% | ||||||
|
CWAE
|
(3.2 | ) | 4.1 | NM | ||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
(27.5 | ) | (18.9 | ) | (46 | )% | ||||||
|
Crown Imports
|
131.2 | 144.7 | (9 | )% | ||||||||
|
Consolidations and eliminations
|
(131.2 | ) | (144.7 | ) | 9 | % | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
150.5 | 169.0 | (11 | )% | ||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
|
(17.3 | ) | (28.9 | ) | NM | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Operating Income
|
$ | 133.2 | $ | 140.1 | (5 | )% | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| NM | = Not Meaningful |
44
Table of Contents
As a result of the factors discussed above, consolidated operating income decreased to
$133.2 million for Second Quarter 2011 from $140.1 million for Second Quarter 2010, a decrease of
$6.9 million, or (5%). Restructuring charges and unusual items of $17.3 million and $28.9 million
for Second Quarter 2011 and Second Quarter 2010, respectively, consist of certain amounts that are
excluded by management in their evaluation of the results of each operating segment. These amounts
include:
| Second | Second | |||||||
| Quarter | Quarter | |||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|
Cost of
Product Sold
|
||||||||
|
Flow through of inventory step-up
|
$ | 0.6 | $ | 2.5 | ||||
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
0.1 | 11.1 | ||||||
|
Inventory write-downs
|
— | 0.6 | ||||||
|
Other
|
— | 1.3 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Cost of Product Sold
|
0.7 | 15.5 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
||||||||
|
Acquisition-related integration costs
|
0.1 | — | ||||||
|
Other costs
|
2.8 | 10.2 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
2.9 | 10.2 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges
|
13.7 | 3.2 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
|
$ | 17.3 | $ | 28.9 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
Equity in Earnings of Equity Method Investees
The Company’s equity in earnings of equity method investees decreased to $66.4 million in
Second Quarter 2011 from $73.2 million in Second Quarter 2010, a decrease of $6.8 million, or (9%).
This decrease is primarily due to lower equity in earnings of Crown Imports.
Net sales for Crown Imports decreased to $679.4 million for Second Quarter 2011 from $696.4
million for Second Quarter 2010, a decrease of $17.0 million, or (2%). This decrease resulted
primarily from lower volumes, higher promotions, and a negative shift in mix within the Crown
Imports Mexican beer portfolio. Volumes and portfolio mix were both negatively impacted in Second
Quarter 2011 by a brewery strike in Mexico and the June 2010 Hurricane Alex, both of which
disrupted product distribution into the U.S. Crown Imports gross profit decreased $12.7 million,
or (6%), primarily due to these factors combined with a contractual price increase in Mexican beer
costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.8 million primarily due to an
increase in selling expenses. The combination of these factors were the main contributors to the
decrease in operating income of $13.5 million, or (9%).
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net of interest income of $0.5 million and $2.6 million, for Second Quarter
2011 and Second Quarter 2010, respectively, decreased to $50.3 million for Second Quarter 2011 from
$68.1 million for Second Quarter 2010, a decrease of $17.8 million, or (26%). The decrease
resulted primarily from lower average interest rates for the Company combined with reduced average
borrowings for Second Quarter 2011.
45
Table of Contents
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate for Second Quarter 2011 and Second Quarter 2010
was 38.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates for both Second Quarter 2011
and Second Quarter 2010 reflect, among other items, decreases in uncertain tax positions in
connection with the completion of various income tax examinations during each respective period.
The amount of the decrease recorded for Second Quarter 2011 was less than the amount recorded for
Second Quarter 2010.
Net Income
As a result of the above factors, net income decreased to $91.3 million for Second Quarter
2011 from $99.7 million for Second Quarter 2010, a decrease of $8.4 million, or (8%).
Six Months 2011 Compared to Six Months 2010
Net Sales
The following table sets forth the net sales (in millions of dollars) by reportable segment of
the Company for Six Months 2011 and Six Months 2010.
| Six | Six | |||||||||||
| Months | Months | % Increase | ||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
||||||||||||
|
Wine
|
$ | 1,132.3 | $ | 1,094.4 | 3 | % | ||||||
|
Spirits
|
113.2 | 124.8 | (9 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
CWNA net sales
|
1,245.5 | 1,219.2 | 2 | % | ||||||||
|
CWAE
|
||||||||||||
|
Wine
|
404.8 | 449.2 | (10 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
CWAE net sales
|
404.8 | 449.2 | (10 | )% | ||||||||
|
Crown Imports net sales
|
1,300.9 | 1,335.5 | (3 | )% | ||||||||
|
Consolidations and eliminations
|
(1,300.9 | ) | (1,335.5 | ) | 3 | % | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Net Sales
|
$ | 1,650.3 | $ | 1,668.4 | (1 | )% | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Net sales for Six Months 2011 decreased to $1,650.3 million from $1,668.4 million for
Six Months 2010, a decrease of $18.1 million, or (1%). This decrease resulted primarily from the
divestitures of the U.K. cider and value spirits businesses of $79.6 million, partially offset by a
favorable year-over-year foreign currency impact of $37.8 million and increases in U.S. branded
wine net sales and U.K. branded wine net sales (on a constant currency basis).
Constellation Wines North America
Net sales for CWNA increased to $1,245.5 million for Six Months 2011 from $1,219.2 million for
Six Months 2010, an increase of $26.3 million, or 2%. Wine net sales increased $37.9 million
primarily due to volume growth and a favorable product mix shift in the U.S. branded wine portfolio
due largely to certain U.S. distributor contractual commitments, and a favorable year-over-year
foreign currency translation impact of $26.1 million, partially offset by increased U.S.
promotional spend. Spirits net sales decreased $11.6 million primarily due to a decrease in net
sales of $14.8 million in connection with the divestiture of the value spirits business.
46
Table of Contents
Constellation Wines Australia and Europe
Net sales for CWAE decreased to $404.8 million for Six Months 2011 from $449.2 million for Six
Months 2010, a decrease of $44.4 million, or (10%). Wine net sales decreased $44.4 million
primarily due to a decrease in net sales of $64.8 million in connection with the divestiture of the
U.K. cider business, partially offset by volume growth of lower margin wine in the U.K.
Crown Imports
As this segment is eliminated in consolidation, see “Equity in Earnings of Equity Method
Investees” below for a discussion of Crown Imports’ net sales, gross profit, selling, general and
administrative expenses, and operating income.
Gross Profit
The Company’s gross profit increased to $584.2 million for Six Months 2011 from $578.3 million
for Six Months 2010, an increase of $5.9 million, or 1%. The CWNA segment’s gross profit increased
$3.1 million primarily due to the volume growth and favorable product mix shift in the U.S. branded
wine portfolio and a favorable foreign currency translation impact of $11.1 million, partially
offset by the increased U.S. promotional spend. The CWAE segment’s gross profit decreased $17.5
million primarily due to the divestiture of the U.K. cider business. In addition, unusual items,
which consist of certain amounts that are excluded by management in their evaluation of the results
of each operating segment, were lower by $20.3 million in Six Months 2011 versus Six Months 2010
primarily due to (i) a decrease in accelerated depreciation of $12.9 million associated with
certain restructuring programs and (ii) a decrease in the flow through of inventory step-up of
$3.6 million associated primarily with the BWE acquisition. Gross profit as a percent of net sales
increased to 35.4% for Six Months 2011 from 34.7% for Six Months 2010 primarily due to (i) the
decrease in unusual items, (ii) divestiture of the U.K. cider business, and (iii) volume growth
of higher-margin U.S. branded wine; partially offset by the increased U.S. promotional spend.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $336.1 million for Six Months 2011
from $331.4 million for Six Months 2010, an increase of $4.7 million, or 1%. This increase is due
to increases of $20.7 million in the CWNA segment and $12.4 million in the Corporate Operations and
Other segment, partially offset by decreases of $21.1 million in unusual items, which consist of
certain amounts that are excluded by management in their evaluation of the results of each
operating segment, and $7.3 million in the CWAE segment. The increase in the CWNA segment’s
selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increases (on a constant currency
basis) in selling expenses of $6.9 million and general and administrative expenses of $4.8 million,
combined with an unfavorable year-over-year foreign currency translation impact of $6.5 million.
The increases in selling expenses and general and administrative expenses is primarily due to costs
associated with Project Fusion, higher consulting service fees associated with the segment’s review
of certain business and process improvement opportunities and higher annual management incentive
compensation expense. The increase in the Corporate Operations and Other segment’s selling,
general and administrative expenses is due to an increase in general and administrative expenses
resulting largely from higher annual management incentive compensation expense, higher stock-based
compensation expense and the overlap of an insurance benefit recognized in the prior year. The
decrease in the CWAE segment’s selling, general and administrative expense is primarily due to the
divestiture of the U.K. cider business. The decrease in unusual items is primarily due to the
recognition in Six Months 2010 of $21.7 million of other costs in connection with the Company’s
Global Initiative.
47
Table of Contents
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales increased to 20.4% for
Six Months 2011 as compared to 19.9% for Six Months 2010 primarily due to the factors discussed
above combined with the increased U.S. promotional spend.
Restructuring Charges
The Company recorded $18.6 million of restructuring charges for Six Months 2011 associated
primarily with the Company’s Global Initiative and Australian Initiative. Restructuring charges
included $11.1 million of employee termination benefit costs, $0.6 million of contract termination
costs, $1.1 million of facility consolidation/relocation costs and $5.8 million of impairment
charges on assets held for sale in Australia. The Company recorded $22.1 million of restructuring
charges for Six Months 2010 associated primarily with the Company’s Global Initiative.
In addition, the Company incurred additional costs for Six Months 2011 and Six Months 2010 in
connection with the Company’s restructuring and acquisition-related integration plans. Total costs
incurred in connection with these plans for Six Months 2011 and Six Months 2010 are as follows:
| Six | Six | |||||||
| Months | Months | |||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|
Cost of
Product Sold
|
||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
$ | 1.1 | $ | 14.0 | ||||
|
Inventory write-downs
|
$ | — | $ | 1.0 | ||||
|
Other
|
$ | — | $ | 2.8 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
||||||||
|
Gain on sale of nonstrategic assets
|
$ | (1.0 | ) | $ | — | |||
|
Acquisition-related integration costs
|
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.1 | ||||
|
Other costs
|
$ | 3.7 | $ | 24.1 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges
|
$ | 18.6 | $ | 22.1 | ||||
The Company expects to incur the following costs in connection with its restructuring
and acquisition-related integration plans for Fiscal 2011:
| Expected | ||||
| Fiscal | ||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | |||
|
Cost of
Product Sold
|
||||
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
$ | 1.1 | ||
|
|
||||
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
||||
|
Gain on sale of nonstrategic assets
|
$ | (3.2 | ) | |
|
Acquisition-related integration costs
|
$ | 0.3 | ||
|
Other costs
|
$ | 4.8 | ||
|
|
||||
|
Restructuring Charges
|
$ | 27.1 | ||
48
Table of Contents
Operating Income
The following table sets forth the operating income (loss) (in millions of dollars) by
reportable segment of the Company for Six Months 2011 and Six Months 2010.
| Six | Six | |||||||||||
| Months | Months | % (Decrease) | ||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | Increase | ||||||||||
|
CWNA
|
$ | 313.7 | $ | 331.3 | (5 | )% | ||||||
|
CWAE
|
(6.0 | ) | 4.2 | NM | ||||||||
|
Corporate Operations and Other
|
(54.0 | ) | (41.6 | ) | (30 | )% | ||||||
|
Crown Imports
|
240.1 | 270.7 | (11 | )% | ||||||||
|
Consolidations and eliminations
|
(240.1 | ) | (270.7 | ) | 11 | % | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
253.7 | 293.9 | (14 | )% | ||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
|
(24.2 | ) | (69.1 | ) | NM | |||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Operating Income
|
$ | 229.5 | $ | 224.8 | 2 | % | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
As a result of the factors discussed above, consolidated operating income increased to
$229.5 million for Six Months 2011 from $224.8 million for Six Months 2010, an increase of $4.7
million, or 2%. Restructuring charges and unusual items of $24.2 million and $69.1 million for Six
Months 2011 and Six Months 2010, respectively, consist of certain amounts that are excluded by
management in their evaluation of the results of each operating segment. These amounts include:
| Six | Six | |||||||
| Months | Months | |||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|
Cost of
Product Sold
|
||||||||
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
$ | 1.1 | $ | 14.0 | ||||
|
Flow through of inventory step-up
|
1.6 | 5.2 | ||||||
|
Inventory write-downs
|
— | 1.0 | ||||||
|
Other
|
— | 2.8 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Cost of Product Sold
|
2.7 | 23.0 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
||||||||
|
Gain on sale of nonstrategic assets
|
(1.0 | ) | — | |||||
|
Acquisition-related integration costs
|
0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
|
Net gain on March 2009 sale of value spirits business
|
— | (0.2 | ) | |||||
|
Other costs
|
3.7 | 24.1 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
2.9 | 24.0 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges
|
18.6 | 22.1 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
|
$ | 24.2 | $ | 69.1 | ||||
|
|
||||||||
Equity in Earnings of Equity Method Investees
The Company’s equity in earnings of equity method investees decreased to $120.9 million in Six
Months 2011 from $136.0 million in Six Months 2010, a decrease of $15.1 million, or (11%). This
decrease is primarily due to lower equity in earnings of Crown Imports.
49
Table of Contents
Net sales for Crown Imports decreased to $1,300.9 million for Six Months 2011 from $1,335.5
million for Six Months 2010, a decrease of $34.6 million, or (3%). This decrease resulted
primarily from lower volumes, higher promotions, and a negative shift in mix within the Crown
Imports Mexican beer portfolio. Volumes and portfolio mix were both negatively impacted in Second
Quarter 2011 by a brewery strike in Mexico and the June 2010 Hurricane Alex, both of which
disrupted product distribution into the U.S. Crown Imports gross profit decreased $27.1 million,
or (7%), primarily due to these factors combined with a contractual price increase in Mexican beer
costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.5 million primarily due to an
increase in advertising spend. The combination of these factors were the main contributors to the
decrease in operating income of $30.6 million, or (11%).
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net of interest income of $1.7 million and $4.6 million, for Six Months 2011
and Six Months 2010, respectively, decreased to $98.8 million for Six Months 2011 from $136.5
million for Six Months 2010, a decrease of $37.7 million, or (28%). The decrease resulted
primarily from lower average interest rates for the Company combined with reduced average
borrowings for Six Months 2011.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate for Six Months 2011 and Six Months 2010 was 44.2%
and 52.7%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for Six Months 2011 included the
recognition of a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in the U.K. of $30.1 million,
partially offset by a decrease in uncertain tax positions in connection with the completion of
various income tax examinations during Six Months 2011. The Company’s effective tax rate for Six
Months 2010 included $37.5 million of taxes associated with the sale of the value spirits business,
partially offset by a decrease in uncertain tax positions in connection with the completion of
various income tax examinations during Second Quarter 2010.
Net Income
As a result of the above factors, net income increased to $140.4 million for Six Months 2011
from $106.2 million for Six Months 2010, an increase of $34.2 million, or 32%.
Financial Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
The Company’s principal use of cash in its operating activities is for purchasing and carrying
inventories and carrying seasonal accounts receivable. The Company’s primary source of liquidity
has historically been cash flow from operations, except during annual grape harvests when the
Company has relied on short-term borrowings. In the U.S. and Canada, the annual grape crush
normally begins in August and runs through October. In Australia and New Zealand, the annual grape
crush normally begins in February and runs through May. The Company generally begins taking
delivery of grapes at the beginning of the crush season with payments for such grapes beginning to
come due one month later. The Company’s short-term borrowings to support such purchases generally
reach their highest levels one to two months after the crush season has ended. Historically, the
Company has used cash flow from operating activities to repay its short-term borrowings and fund
capital expenditures. The Company will continue to use its short-term borrowings to support its
working capital requirements.
50
Table of Contents
While certain conditions in the worldwide and domestic economies may be showing signs of
improvement, there continues to be volatility in the capital markets, diminished liquidity and
credit availability, and increased counterparty risk. Nevertheless, the Company has maintained
adequate liquidity to meet current working capital requirements, fund capital expenditures and
repay scheduled principal and interest payments on debt. Absent further severe deterioration of
market conditions, the Company believes that cash flows from operating activities and its financing
activities, primarily short-term borrowings, will provide adequate resources to satisfy its working
capital, scheduled principal and interest payments on debt, and anticipated capital expenditure
requirements for both its short-term and long-term capital needs.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had $656.2 million in revolving loans available to be
drawn under its 2006 Credit Agreement (as defined below). The member financial institutions
participating in the Company’s 2006 Credit Agreement have complied with prior funding requests and
the Company believes the member financial institutions will comply with ongoing funding requests.
However, there can be no assurances that any particular financial institution will continue to do
so in the future.
Six Months 2011 Cash Flows
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for Six Months 2011 was $305.7 million, which
resulted primarily from net income of $140.4 million; plus $185.9 million of net noncash items
charged to the Consolidated Statements of Operations; plus net cash provided by the net change in
the Company’s inventories of $157.2 million and other accrued expenses and liabilities of $39.7
million, partially offset by accounts receivable, net of $204.5 million.
The net noncash items consisted primarily of depreciation expense, deferred tax provision,
equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of distributed earnings, and stock-based
compensation expense. The decrease in inventories and the increase in accounts receivable, net
were both due largely to seasonality as January and February are typically the Company’s lowest
selling months. In addition, these seasonal changes were even more pronounced due to the lighter
than normal sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 associated with the U.S. distributor
consolidation transition. The increase in other accrued expenses and liabilities is largely due to
the timing of income tax payments and interest payments.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for Six Months 2011 was $10.9 million, which resulted
primarily from $43.2 million of capital expenditures and $29.6 million investment in the CWNA
segment’s international equity method investment, Ruffino, in connection with the settlement of the
irrevocable and unconditional put option of the incremental 9.9% ownership interest, partially
offset by $60.0 million of proceeds from the note receivable received in connection with the
divestiture of the value spirits business.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for Six Months 2011 was $324.0 million resulting
primarily from purchases of treasury stock of $300.0 million through the ASB transaction (as
defined below), $24.5 million of principal payments of long-term debt and $24.1 million of net
repayment of notes payable, partially offset by $18.0 million of proceeds from exercise of employee
stock options.
51
Table of Contents
Share Repurchase
In April 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
$300.0 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Convertible Common Stock.
Pursuant to this authorization, the Company repurchased $300.0 million of its shares of Class A
Common Stock through a collared accelerated stock buyback (“ASB”) transaction which was announced
in April 2010. During the three months ended May 31, 2010, the Company received 13,801,480 shares
of Class A Common Stock, representing the minimum number of shares that will be received under the
ASB transaction. The Company used revolver borrowings under the 2006 Credit Agreement to pay the
purchase price for the repurchased shares. The repurchased shares that have been received have
become treasury shares. The final number of shares to which the Company is entitled under the ASB
transaction will generally be based on the average of the daily volume weighted average prices of
the Company’s Class A Common Stock over a calculation period (scheduled to end on November 24,
2010, subject to being shortened by the counterparty to the ASB transaction), but no less than
13,801,480 shares or more than 18,401,973 shares subject to certain terms of the ASB transaction.
The Company paid the purchase price under the ASB transaction in April 2010, at which time it
received an initial installment of 11,016,451 shares of Class A Common Stock. In May 2010, the
Company received an additional 2,785,029 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the
early termination of the hedge period on May 10, 2010. The Company may be entitled to receive up
to 4,600,493 additional shares pursuant to the ASB transaction following the end of the calculation
period.
Debt
Total
debt outstanding as of August 31, 2010, amounted to $3,783.4 million,
a decrease of $52.1 million from February 28, 2010.
Senior Credit Facility
2006 Credit Agreement
The Company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a lender and
administrative agent, and certain other agents, lenders, and financial institutions are parties to
a credit agreement, as amended (the “2006 Credit Agreement”). The 2006 Credit Agreement provides
for aggregate credit facilities of $3,842.0 million, consisting of (i) a $1,200.0 million tranche
A term loan facility with a final maturity in June 2011 (the “Tranche A Term Loans”), (ii) a
$1,800.0 million tranche B term loan facility, of which $1,500.0 million has a final maturity in
June 2013 (the “2013 Tranche B Term Loans”) and $300.0 million has a final maturity in June 2015
(the “2015 Tranche B Term Loans”), and (iii) an $842.0 million revolving credit facility
(including a sub-facility for letters of credit of up to $200 million), of which $192.0 million
terminates in June 2011 (the “2011 Revolving Facility”) and $650.0 million terminates in June 2013
(the “2013 Revolving Facility”). The Company uses its revolving credit facility under the 2006
Credit Agreement for general corporate purposes.
As of August 31, 2010, under the 2006 Credit Agreement, the Company had outstanding Tranche A
Term Loans of $300.0 million bearing an interest rate of 1.6%, 2013 Tranche B Term Loans of $928.0
million bearing an interest rate of 1.8%, 2015 Tranche B Term Loans of $300.0 million bearing an
interest rate of 3.1%, 2011 Revolving Facility of $55.9 million bearing an interest rate of 1.6%,
2013 Revolving Facility of $221.1 million bearing an interest rate of 2.7%, outstanding letters of
credit of $13.9 million, and $551.1 million in revolving loans available to be drawn.
As of September 30, 2010, under the 2006 Credit Agreement, the Company had outstanding Tranche
A Term Loans of $225.0 million bearing an interest rate of 1.6%, 2013 Tranche B Term Loans of
$928.0 million bearing an interest rate of 1.8%, 2015 Tranche B Term Loans of $300.0 million
bearing an interest rate of 3.1%, 2011 Revolving Facility of $27.8 million bearing an interest rate
of 1.8%, 2013 Revolving Facility of $144.1 million bearing an interest rate of 2.7%, outstanding
letters of credit of $13.9 million, and $656.2 million in revolving loans available to be drawn.
52
Table of Contents
Through February 28, 2010, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements which
were designated as cash flow hedges of $1,200.0 million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt.
The designated cash flow hedges fixed the Company’s interest rates on $1,200.0 million of the
Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt through February 28, 2010. In addition, the Company had
offsetting undesignated interest rate swap agreements with an absolute notional amount of $2,400.0
million outstanding as of February 28, 2010. On March 1, 2010, the Company paid $11.9 million in
connection with the maturity of these outstanding interest rate swap agreements, which is reported
in other, net in cash flows from operating activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows. In June 2010, the Company entered into a new five year delayed start interest rate
swap agreement effective September 1, 2011, which was designated as a cash flow hedge for $500.0
million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt. Accordingly, the Company fixed its interest
rates on $500.0 million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt at an average rate of 2.9%
(exclusive of borrowing margins) through September 1, 2016. For Six Months 2010 and Second Quarter
2010, the Company reclassified net losses of $12.9 million and $7.1 million, respectively, net of
income tax effect, from AOCI to interest expense, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Company did not reclassify any amount from AOCI to interest expense, net on its
Consolidated Statements of Operations for Six Months 2011 and Second Quarter 2011.
53
Table of Contents
Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which
are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those
set forth in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements
of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including without limitation the
statements under Part I — Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” regarding (i) the Company’s business strategy, future financial position,
prospects, plans and objectives of management, (ii) the Company’s expected restructuring charges,
accelerated depreciation, acquisition-related integration costs, other costs, and gain on sale of
nonstrategic assets, (iii) information concerning expected or potential actions of third parties,
(iv) future worldwide or domestic economic conditions and the global credit environment, (v)
information concerning the future expected balance of supply and demand for wine, (vi) information
concerning the number of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock the Company will receive
pursuant to the ASB transaction, and (vii) the expected impact upon results of operations
resulting from the Company’s decision to consolidate its U.S. distributor network are
forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words
“anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. All
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The
Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. Although the Company believes that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance
that such expectations will prove to be correct. In addition to the risks and uncertainties of
ordinary business operations and conditions in the general economy and markets in which the Company
competes, the forward-looking statements of the Company contained in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q are also subject to the risk and uncertainty that (i) the impact upon results of operations
resulting from the decision to consolidate the Company’s U.S. distributor network will vary from
current expectations due to implementation of consolidation activities and actual U.S. distributor
transition experience, (ii) the actual balance of supply and demand for wine products will vary
from current expectations due to, among other reasons, actual consumer demand, (iii) the actual
number of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock received in the ASB transaction is subject
to the terms of the ASB transaction and may vary from current expectations due to, among other
things, the actual duration of the calculation period and the trading prices of the Company’s Class
A Common Stock during the remainder of the calculation period, and (iv) the Company’s
restructuring charges, accelerated depreciation, acquisition-related integration costs, other
costs, and gain on sale of nonstrategic assets may vary materially from current expectations due
to, among other reasons, variations in anticipated headcount reductions, contract terminations or
modifications, equipment relocation, proceeds from the sale of assets identified for sale, product
portfolio rationalizations, production footprint, and/or other costs of implementation. For
additional information about risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect the Company’s
forward-looking statements, please refer to Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.
54
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company, as a result of its global operating, acquisition and financing activities, is
exposed to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest
rates. To manage the volatility relating to these risks, the Company periodically purchases and/or
sells derivative instruments including foreign currency forward and option contracts and interest
rate swap agreements. The Company uses derivative instruments solely to reduce the financial
impact of these risks and does not use derivative instruments for trading purposes.
Foreign currency derivative instruments are or may be used to hedge existing
foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, forecasted foreign currency denominated
sales/purchases to/from third parties as well as intercompany sales/purchases, intercompany
principal and interest payments, and in connection with acquisitions or joint venture investments
outside the U.S. As of August 31, 2010, the Company had exposures to foreign currency risk
primarily related to the Australian dollar, euro, New Zealand dollar, British pound sterling,
Canadian dollar and South African rand.
As of August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding foreign currency
derivative instruments with a notional value of $1,290.4 million and $1,585.5 million
,
respectively. Approximately 75% of the Company’s total exposures were hedged as of August 31,
2010, including most of the Company’s balance sheet exposures and certain of the Company’s
forecasted transactional exposures for the year ending February 28, 2011. The estimated fair value of the Company’s foreign
currency derivative instruments was a net asset of $14.7 million and $59.6 million as of August 31,
2010, and August 31, 2009, respectively. Using a sensitivity analysis based on estimated fair
value of open contracts using forward rates, if the contract base currency had been 10% weaker as
of August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, the fair value of open foreign currency contracts would
have been decreased by $9.9 million and $16.6 million, respectively. Losses or gains from the
revaluation or settlement of the related underlying positions would substantially offset such gains
or losses on the derivative instruments.
The fair value of fixed rate debt is subject to interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign
currency risk. The estimated fair value of the Company’s total fixed rate debt, including current
maturities, was $2,031.1 million and $2,420.1 million as of August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009,
respectively. A hypothetical 1% increase from prevailing interest rates as of August 31, 2010, and
August 31, 2009, would have resulted in a decrease in fair value of fixed interest rate long-term
debt by $95.8 million and $101.1 million, respectively.
In addition to the $2,031.1 million and $2,420.1 million estimated fair value of fixed rate
debt outstanding as of August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, respectively, the Company also had
variable rate debt outstanding (primarily LIBOR-based), certain of which includes a fixed margin.
As of August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of the Company’s total
variable rate debt, including current maturities, was $1,789.1 million and $1,745.0 million,
respectively. Using a sensitivity analysis based on a hypothetical 1% increase in prevailing
interest rates over a 12-month period, the approximate increase in cash required for interest as of
August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2009, is $39.2 million and $17.5 million, respectively.
55
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on
their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s “disclosure
controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that
the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In connection with the foregoing evaluation by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its
Chief Financial Officer, no changes were identified in the Company’s “internal control over
financial reporting” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2010 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
56
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
As previously announced and reported, the Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“GS&Co.”)
previously entered into a collared accelerated stock buyback transaction with respect to the
Company’s Class A Common Stock (the “ASB Transaction”). During the period from June 1, 2010
through August 31, 2010 (the “Covered Quarter”), the Company did not receive any additional shares
pursuant to the ASB Transaction. However, the Company may receive additional shares from GS&Co.
for no additional consideration based upon application of a formula set forth in the ASB
Transaction following a calculation period which includes the Covered Quarter and is scheduled to
end on November 24, 2010, which period may be shortened in GS&Co.’s discretion. However, it is not
possible at this time for the Company to determine the final number of additional shares, if any,
which it will receive in the ASB Transaction or the final price of the aggregate number of shares
received pursuant to the ASB Transaction.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
For the exhibits that are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference, see the Index to
Exhibits located on page 59 of this report. The Index to Exhibits is incorporated herein by
reference.
57
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.
|
||||
| Dated: October 12, 2010 | By: | /s/ David M. Thomas | ||
| David M. Thomas, Senior Vice President, | ||||
| Finance and Controller | ||||
| Dated: October 12, 2010 | By: | /s/ Robert Ryder | ||
| Robert Ryder, Executive Vice President | ||||
|
and Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer) |
||||
58
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No
.
| 2.1 | Agreement to Establish Joint Venture, dated July 17, 2006, between Barton Beers, Ltd. and Diblo, S.A. de C.V. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 17, 2006, filed July 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).+ | ||
| 2.2 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 2, 2007 to the Agreement to Establish Joint Venture, dated July 17, 2006, between Barton Beers, Ltd. and Diblo, S.A. de C.V. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 2, 2007, filed January 3, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).+ | ||
| 2.3 | Barton Contribution Agreement, dated July 17, 2006, among Barton Beers, Ltd., Diblo, S.A. de C.V. and Company (a Delaware limited liability company to be formed) (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 17, 2006, filed July 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).+ | ||
| 3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 3.3 | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 6, 2007, filed December 12, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.1 | Indenture, with respect to 7.25% Senior Notes due 2016, dated as of August 15, 2006, by and among the Company, as Issuer, certain subsidiaries, as Guarantors and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 15, 2006, filed August 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.2 | Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of August 15, 2006, among the Company, as Issuer, certain subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 15, 2006, filed August 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
59
Table of Contents
Exhibit No
.
| 4.3 | Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of November 30, 2006, by and among the Company, Vincor International Partnership, Vincor International II, LLC, Vincor Holdings, Inc., R.H. Phillips, Inc., The Hogue Cellars, Ltd., Vincor Finance, LLC, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.28 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.4 | Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of May 4, 2007, by and among the Company, Barton SMO Holdings LLC, ALCOFI INC., and Spirits Marque One LLC, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.32 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.5 | Supplemental Indenture No. 4, with respect to 8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2014, dated as of December 5, 2007, by and among the Company, as Issuer, certain subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., (as successor to BNY Midwest Trust Company), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2007, filed December 11, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.6 | Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of January 22, 2008, by and among the Company, BWE, Inc., Atlas Peak Vineyards, Inc., Buena Vista Winery, Inc., Clos du Bois Wines, Inc., Gary Farrell Wines, Inc., Peak Wines International, Inc., and Planet 10 Spirits, LLC, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (successor trustee to BNY Midwest Trust Company), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.37 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.7 | Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of February 27, 2009, by and among the Company, Constellation Services LLC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association (successor trustee to BNY Midwest Trust Company), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.31 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.8 | Indenture, with respect to 7.25% Senior Notes due May 2017, dated May 14, 2007, by and among the Company, as Issuer, certain subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2007, filed May 14, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.9 | Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of January 22, 2008, by and among the Company, BWE, Inc., Atlas Peak Vineyards, Inc., Buena Vista Winery, Inc., Clos du Bois Wines, Inc., Gary Farrell Wines, Inc., Peak Wines International, Inc., and Planet 10 Spirits, LLC, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (successor trustee to BNY Midwest Trust Company), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.39 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
60
Table of Contents
Exhibit No
.
| 4.10 | Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of February 27, 2009, by and among the Company, Constellation Services LLC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association (successor trustee to BNY Midwest Trust Company), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.34 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.11 | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006, among Constellation, the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Citicorp North America, Inc., as Syndication Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners, and The Bank of Nova Scotia and SunTrust Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents (filed as Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.12 | Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 23, 2007, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006, among Constellation, the subsidiary guarantors referred to on the signature pages to such Amendment No. 1, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated and filed February 23, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.13 | Amendment No. 2, dated as of November 19, 2007, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006, among Constellation, the Subsidiary Guarantors referred to on the signature pages to such Amendment No. 2, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated and filed November 20, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.14 | Amendment No. 3, dated as of January 25, 2010, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006, among Constellation Brands, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors referred to on the signature pages to such Amendment No. 3, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as Administrative Agent and Issuing Lender, Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as Swingline Lender, The Bank of Nova Scotia, in its capacity as Issuing Lender, JPMorgan Securities Inc., in its capacity as joint bookrunner, CoBank, ACB, in its capacity as joint bookrunner, Banc of America Securities LLC, in its capacity as joint bookrunner and Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch in its capacity as joint bookrunner (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 25, 2010, filed January 26, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.15 | Guarantee Assumption Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2006, by Constellation Leasing, LLC, in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 2006 (as modified and supplemented and in effect from time to time) (filed as Exhibit 4.29 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
61
Table of Contents
Exhibit No
.
| 4.16 | Guarantee Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2006, by Vincor International Partnership, Vincor International II, LLC, Vincor Holdings, Inc., R.H. Phillips, Inc., The Hogue Cellars, Ltd., and Vincor Finance, LLC in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 2006 (as modified and supplemented and in effect from time to time) (filed as Exhibit 4.31 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.17 | Guarantee Assumption Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2007, by Barton SMO Holdings LLC, ALCOFI INC., and Spirits Marque One LLC in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 2006 (as modified and supplemented and in effect from time to time) (filed as Exhibit 4.39 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.18 | Guarantee Assumption Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2008, by BWE, Inc., Atlas Peak Vineyards, Inc., Buena Vista Winery, Inc., Clos du Bois Wines, Inc., Gary Farrell Wines, Inc., Peak Wines International, Inc., and Planet 10 Spirits, LLC in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 2006 (as modified and supplemented and in effect from time to time) (filed as Exhibit 4.46 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 4.19 | Guarantee Assumption Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2009, by Constellation Services LLC in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 2006 (as modified and supplemented and in effect from time to time) (filed as Exhibit 4.42 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
| 10.1 | Form of Terms and Conditions Memorandum for Directors with respect to grants of options to purchase Class 1 Stock pursuant to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (grants on or after July 22, 2010) (filed herewith).* | ||
| 10.2 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors with respect to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (grants on or after July 22, 2010) (filed herewith).* | ||
| 31.1 | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). | ||
| 31.2 | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). |
62
Table of Contents
Exhibit No
.
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350 (filed herewith). | ||
| 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350 (filed herewith). | ||
| 101 | The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2010, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at August 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months and the three months ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.** |
| * | Designates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
| ** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), as amended, and otherwise not subject to liability under those sections. This exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates this exhibit by reference. | |
| + | This Exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission pursuant to an application for confidential treatment. The confidential portions of this Exhibit have been omitted and are marked by an asterisk. |
The Company agrees, upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to furnish copies
of each instrument that defines the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company or its
subsidiaries that is not filed herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) because the total amount
of long-term debt authorized under such instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the
Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
63
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I Financial InformationprintItem 1. Financial StatementsprintItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsprintItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskprintItem 4. Controls and ProceduresprintPart II Other InformationprintItem 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of ProceedsprintItem 6. Exhibitsprint