TER 10-Q Quarterly Report July 4, 2010 | Alphaminr

TER 10-Q Quarter ended July 4, 2010

TERADYNE, INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 4, 2010

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to

Commission File No. 001-06462

TERADYNE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Massachusetts 04-2272148

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

600 Riverpark Drive, North Reading, Massachusetts 01864
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

978-370-2700

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s only class of Common Stock as of August 9, 2010 was 181,347,263 shares.


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

INDEX

Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited):

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009

3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009

4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009

5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

26

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

39

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

39
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

41

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

41

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

41

Item 6.

Exhibits

42

2


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1: Financial Statements

TERADYNE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

July 4,
2010
December 31,
2009
(in thousands,
except per share amounts)
ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 403,996 $ 416,737

Marketable securities

161,778 46,933

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,756 and $3,770
at July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

248,018 125,236

Inventories:

Parts

51,699 43,691

Assemblies in process

22,159 37,161

Finished goods

9,962 9,984
83,820 90,836

Deferred tax assets

19,711 18,944

Prepayments and other current assets

47,994 63,606

Total current assets

965,317 762,292

Property, plant, and equipment, at cost

777,494 782,407

Less: accumulated depreciation

541,802 536,045

Net property, plant, and equipment

235,692 246,362

Long-term marketable securities

95,487 55,130

Intangible assets, net

137,522 152,192

Other assets

15,307 19,361

Total assets

$ 1,449,325 $ 1,235,337
LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$ 96,044 $ 66,765

Accrued employees’ compensation and withholdings

80,592 55,356

Deferred revenue and customer advances

41,451 104,439

Other accrued liabilities

62,619 54,640

Accrued income taxes

11,346

Current debt

2,291 2,157

Total current liabilities

294,343 283,357

Retirement plans liabilities

69,757 115,101

Deferred tax liabilities

10,136 8,041

Long-term other accrued liabilities

20,836 23,159

Long-term debt

145,497 141,100

Total liabilities

540,569 570,758

Commitments and contingencies (Note N)

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock, $0.125 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 181,162 shares and 174,908 shares issued and outstanding at July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

22,645 21,864

Additional paid-in capital

1,253,098 1,202,426

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(117,631 ) (138,105 )

Accumulated deficit

(249,356 ) (421,606 )

Total shareholders’ equity

908,756 664,579

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 1,449,325 $ 1,235,337

The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teradyne’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, are an integral part of the condensed

consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net revenues:

Products

$ 391,148 $ 115,148 $ 659,352 $ 179,884

Services

63,628 54,432 125,047 110,304

Total net revenues

454,776 169,580 784,399 290,188

Cost of revenues:

Cost of products

167,160 92,635 290,856 148,795

Cost of services

33,313 29,816 65,696 60,904

Total cost of revenues

200,473 122,451 356,552 209,699

Gross profit

254,303 47,129 427,847 80,489

Operating expenses:

Engineering and development

50,393 38,451 99,445 85,649

Selling and administrative

58,343 47,257 114,214 102,630

Acquired intangible asset amortization

7,313 8,214 14,669 16,453

Restructuring and other, net

1,700 15,270 2,964 31,235

Total operating expenses

117,749 109,192 231,292 235,967

Income (loss) from operations

136,554 (62,063 ) 196,555 (155,478 )

Interest income

3,681 1,141 4,523 1,917

Interest expense and other

(8,543 ) (8,046 ) (14,456 ) (13,875 )

Income (loss) before income taxes

131,692 (68,968 ) 186,622 (167,436 )

Income tax provision (benefit)

9,543 (2,200 ) 14,373 (10,000 )

Net income (loss)

$ 122,149 $ (66,768 ) $ 172,249 $ (157,436 )

Net income (loss) per common share:

Basic

$ 0.68 $ (0.39 ) $ 0.97 $ (0.91 )

Diluted

$ 0.55 $ (0.39 ) $ 0.79 $ (0.91 )

Weighted average common share—basic

179,990 173,022 178,429 172,576

Weighted average common share—diluted

231,541 173,022 228,909 172,576

The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teradyne’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, are an integral part of the condensed

consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income (loss)

$ 172,249 $ (157,436 )

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:

Depreciation

26,940 30,251

Amortization

23,191 21,343

Stock-based compensation

15,553 12,109

Provision for excess and obsolete inventory

1,665 17,208

Loss on sale and impairment of marketable securities, net

410 2,532

Non-cash charge for sale of inventories revalued at the date of acquisition

5,163

Revolving credit facility issue costs

2,488

Deferred taxes

(5,852 )

Other

1,419 955

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired:

Accounts receivable

(122,782 ) 35,757

Inventories

25,079 29,459

Other assets

15,361 2,392

Accounts payable, deferred revenue and accrued expenses

(10,930 ) (39,154 )

Retirement plan contributions

(24,677 ) (3,972 )

Accrued income taxes

11,346

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

134,824 (46,757 )

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(35,706 ) (17,428 )

Purchases of available-for-sale marketable securities

(223,820 )

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale marketable securities

47,267 11,946

Proceeds from sales of trading marketable securities

23,700

Proceeds from life insurance

1,091 1,076

Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired

(3,741 )

Net cash used for investing activities

(187,468 ) (8,147 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Issuance of common stock under employee stock option and stock purchase plans

41,873 14,272

Payments of long-term debt

(1,123 )

Proceeds from long-term debt

172,914

Repayment of revolving credit facility principal

(122,500 )

Net cash provided by financing activities

40,750 64,686

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

(847 ) 1,594

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(12,741 ) 11,376

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

416,737 322,705

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 403,996 $ 334,081

The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teradyne’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, are an integral part of the condensed

consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A. The Company

Teradyne, Inc. (“Teradyne”) is a leading global supplier of automatic test equipment. Teradyne’s automatic test equipment products and services include:

semiconductor test (“Semiconductor Test”) systems; and

military/aerospace (“Mil/Aero”) test instrumentation and systems, hard disk drive test (“HDD”) systems, circuit-board test and inspection (“Commercial Board Test”) systems, and automotive diagnostic and test (“Diagnostic Solutions”) systems (collectively these products represent “Systems Test Group”).

B. Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Teradyne and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. These interim financial statements are unaudited and reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of such interim financial statements. Certain prior year’s amounts were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The December 31, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in Teradyne’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2010 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition to remove tangible products containing non-software and software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality from the scope of industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance. In October 2009, the FASB also amended the accounting standards for arrangements with multiple deliverables. Teradyne elected to early adopt this accounting guidance at the beginning of its first quarter of 2010 on a prospective basis. Adoption had no material impact on Teradyne’s financial position or results of operations in the three and six months ended July 4, 2010.

Teradyne recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, title and risk of loss have passed, delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss generally pass to Teradyne’s customers upon shipment or at delivery destination point. In circumstances where either title or risk of loss pass upon destination, acceptance or cash payment, Teradyne defers revenue recognition until such events occur.

Teradyne’s equipment has non-software and software components that function together to deliver the equipment’s essential functionality. Revenue is recognized upon shipment or at delivery destination point, provided that customer acceptance criteria can be demonstrated prior to shipment. Certain contracts require Teradyne to perform tests of the product to ensure that performance meets the published product specifications or

6


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

customer requested specifications, which are generally conducted prior to shipment. Where the criteria cannot be demonstrated prior to shipment, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance has been received. Teradyne also defers the portion of the sales price that is not due until acceptance, which represents deferred profit.

For multiple element arrangements, Teradyne allocates revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, a hierarchy is used to determine the selling price for allocating revenue to deliverables as follows: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”), and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (“BESP”). For a delivered item to be considered a separate unit, the delivered item must have value to the customer on a standalone basis and the delivery or performance of the undelivered item must be considered probable and substantially in the control of Teradyne.

Teradyne’s post-shipment obligations include installation, training services, one-year standard warranties, and extended warranties. Installation does not alter the product capabilities, does not require specialized skills or tools and can be performed by the customers or other vendors. Installation is typically provided within five days of product shipment and is completed within one to two days thereafter. Training services are optional and do not affect the customer’s ability to use the product. Teradyne defers revenue for the selling price of installation and training.

C. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2010, FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-17, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition , to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, “Revenue Recognition.” The guidance in this consensus allows the milestone method as an acceptable revenue recognition methodology when an arrangement includes substantive milestones. The guidance provides a definition of substantive milestone and should be applied regardless of whether the arrangement includes single or multiple deliverables or units of accounting. The scope of this consensus is limited to the transactions involving milestones relating to research and development deliverables. The guidance includes enhanced disclosure requirements about each arrangement, individual milestones and related contingent consideration, information about substantive milestones and factors considered in the determination. The consensus is effective prospectively to milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, after June 15, 2010. Early application and retrospective application are permitted. Teradyne will adopt this final consensus prospectively in January 2011 and the adoption is not expected to have a material impact on Teradyne’s financial position or results of operations.

D. Financial Instruments and Derivatives

Financial Instruments

Teradyne uses the market and income approach to value its financial instruments and there was no change in valuation techniques used by Teradyne during the six months ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009. As defined in ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” , fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820-10 requires that assets and liabilities are carried at fair value and are classified in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets as of the reporting date.

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1, that are observable either directly or indirectly as of the reporting date. For example, a common approach for valuing fixed income securities is the use of matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used to value securities by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

7


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not supported by market data. Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available, which might include Teradyne’s own data.

For the right to sell the auction rate securities, held by Teradyne, back to UBS (“UBS Put”), Teradyne elected fair value treatment under ASC 825-10, “Financial Instruments.” The UBS Put was the only instrument of this nature or type that Teradyne held and for which Teradyne has elected the fair value option under ASC 825-10. The UBS Put was exercised in June 2010.

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurement”, which requires interim disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. Additionally, this ASU requires disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. These disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. Further, the ASU requires separate presentation of Level 3 activity for the fair value measurements. Teradyne adopted the interim disclosure requirements under this ASU during the quarter ended April 4, 2010, with the exception of the separate presentation in the Level 3 activity rollforward, which is not effective until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.

During the six months ended July 4, 2010, there were no significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2.

The following table sets forth by fair value hierarchy Teradyne’s financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

July 4, 2010
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Available for sale securities:

Money market funds

$ 292,704 $ $ $ 292,704

U.S. government agency securities

102,335 102,335

U.S. Treasury securities

71,240 71,240

Corporate debt securities

43,486 43,486

Commercial paper

25,182 25,182

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

4,157 9,683 13,840

Equity and debt mutual funds

6,950 6,950

Municipal bonds

5,634 5,634

Non-U.S. government securities

260 260

Total

375,311 186,320 561,631

Trading securities:

Auction rate securities

2,836 2,836

Derivatives

409 409

Total

$ 375,311 $ 186,729 $ 2,836 $ 564,876

8


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Reported as follows:

(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 292,704 $ 14,498 $ $ 307,202

Marketable securities

48,454 113,324 161,778

Long-term marketable securities

34,153 58,498 2,836 95,487

Prepayments and other current assets

409 409
$ 375,311 $ 186,729 $ 2,836 $ 564,876
December 31, 2009
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Available for sale securities:

Money market funds

$ 284,236 $ $ $ 284,236

Corporate debt securities

21,224 21,224

U.S. government agency securities

16,418 16,418

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

4,136 11,719 15,855

U.S. Treasury securities

12,010 12,010

Commercial paper

8,245 8,245

Equity and debt mutual funds

7,499 7,499

Municipal bonds

528 528

Non-U.S. government securities

287 287

Total

308,168 58,134 366,302

Trading securities:

Auction rate securities

23,649 23,649

UBS Put

2,830 2,830

Total

$ 308,168 $ 58,134 $ 26,479 $ 392,781

Liabilities

Derivatives

$ $ 143 $ $ 143

Total

$ $ 143 $ $ 143

9


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Reported as follows:

(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 284,237 $ 3,651 $ $ 287,888

Marketable securities

12,137 34,796 46,933

Long-term marketable securities

11,794 19,687 23,649 55,130

Other assets

2,830 2,830
$ 308,168 $ 58,134 $ 26,479 $ 392,781

Liabilities

Other accrued liabilities

$ $ 143 $ $ 143

The following table represents changes in the fair value of Level 3 financial assets:

For the Three Months Ended
July 4, 2010 July 5, 2009
Long-Term
Auction Rate
Securities
UBS Put Long-Term
Auction Rate
Securities
UBS Put
(in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period

$ 23,697 $ 2,687 $ 25,521 $ 3,277

Sale of auction rate securities and exercise of UBS Put

(20,863 ) (2,687 )

Change in unrealized gain included in interest income

2 665

Change in unrealized loss included in interest expense and other

(207 )

Balance at end of period

$ 2,836 $ $ 26,186 $ 3,070
For the Six Months Ended
July 4, 2010 July 5, 2009
Long-Term
Auction Rate
Securities
UBS Put Long-Term
Auction Rate
Securities
UBS Put
(in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period

$ 23,649 $ 2,830 $ 25,968 $ 3,330

Sale of auction rate securities and exercise of UBS Put

(21,013 ) (2,687 )

Change in unrealized gain included in interest income

200 665

Change in unrealized loss included in interest expense and other

(143 ) (447 ) (260 )

Balance at end of period

$ 2,836 $ $ 26,186 $ 3,070

During the three months ended July 4, 2010, Teradyne recorded a net loss of $0.1 million from sales of marketable securities and exercise of UBS Put. During the three months ended July 5, 2009, Teradyne recorded a gain of $0.7 million for the change in the auction rate securities fair value.

During the six months ended July 4, 2010, Teradyne recorded a net loss of $0.4 million from sales of marketable securities and exercise of UBS Put. During the six months ended July 5, 2009, Teradyne recorded a $1.9 million loss from sales of marketable securities.

10


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During the three and six months ended July 5, 2009, Teradyne determined that it did not intend to hold certain marketable securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in market value and recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss in the amount of $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Realized losses from sale of marketable securities, decreases in auction rate securities fair value and other-than-temporary impairment losses are included in interest expense and other. Increases in auction rate securities fair value are included in interest income.

The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments at July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:

July 4, 2010 December 31, 2009
Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
(in thousands)

Cash equivalents

$ 307,202 $ 307,202 $ 287,888 $ 287,888

Marketable securities

257,265 257,265 102,063 102,063

UBS Put

2,830 2,830

Convertible debt(1)

138,627 367,183 133,554 392,113

Japan loan

9,161 9,161 9,703 9,703

(1) The carrying value represents the bifurcated debt component only, while the fair value is based on quoted market prices for the convertible note which includes the equity conversion feature.

The fair values of cash, accounts receivable, net and accounts payable approximate the carrying amount due to the short term maturities of these instruments.

The following table summarizes available-for-sale marketable securities which are recorded at fair value:

July 4, 2010
Available-for-Sale Fair Market
Value of Investments
with Unrealized  Losses
Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
(in thousands)

Money market funds

$ 292,704 $ $ $ 292,704 $

U.S. government agency securities

102,207 139 (11 ) 102,335 7,357

U.S. Treasury securities

71,108 133 (1 ) 71,240 5,032

Corporate debt securities

43,406 104 (24 ) 43,486 17,574

Commercial paper

25,184 (2 ) 25,182 3,987

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

13,841 (1 ) 13,840 1,501

Equity and debt mutual funds

6,947 405 (402 ) 6,950 3,691

Municipal bonds

5,634 5,634

Non-U.S. government securities

244 16 260
$ 561,275 $ 797 $ (441 ) $ 561,631 $ 39,142

11


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Reported as follows:

Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
Fair Market
Value of Investments
with Unrealized Losses
(in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 307,202 $ $ $ 307,202 $

Marketable securities

161,715 84 (21 ) 161,778 22,931

Long-term marketable securities

92,358 713 (420 ) 92,651 16,211
$ 561,275 $ 797 $ (441 ) $ 561,631 $ 39,142
December 31, 2009
Available-for-Sale Fair Market
Value of Investments
with Unrealized  Losses
Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
(in thousands)

Money market funds

$ 284,236 $ $ $ 284,236 $

Corporate debt securities

21,243 11 (30 ) 21,224 11,091

U.S. government agency securities

16,418 5 (5 ) 16,418 6,155

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

15,854 1 15,855

U.S. Treasury securities

12,014 (4 ) 12,010 10,508

Commercial paper

8,246 (1 ) 8,245 2,397

Equity and debt mutual funds

7,430 622 (553 ) 7,499 4,139

Municipal bonds

532 (4 ) 528 528

Non-U.S. government securities

269 18 287
$ 366,242 $ 657 $ (597 ) $ 366,302 $ 34,818

Reported as follows:

Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
Fair Market
Value of Investments
with Unrealized Losses
(in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 287,888 $ $ $ 287,888 $

Short-term marketable securities

46,928 7 (2 ) 46,933 16,425

Long-term marketable securities

31,426 650 (595 ) 31,481 18,393
$ 366,242 $ 657 $ (597 ) $ 366,302 $ 34,818

On a quarterly basis, Teradyne reviews its investments to identify and evaluate those that have an indication of a potential other-than-temporary impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is other-than-temporary include:

The length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost;

The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and

The intent and ability to retain the investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

As of July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair market value of investments with unrealized losses totaled $39.1 million and $34.8 million, respectively. Teradyne determined that the unrealized losses in the amount of $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to these investments are temporary.

12


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Derivatives

Teradyne conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with certain transactions denominated in local currencies. The purpose of Teradyne’s foreign currency management is to minimize the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign denominated net monetary assets. Teradyne does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

To minimize the effect of exchange rate fluctuations associated with the remeasurement of net monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies, Teradyne enters into foreign currency forward contracts. The change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded directly in earnings, and is used to offset the change in fair value of the net monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies.

The notional amount of foreign exchange contracts hedging monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies was $59.3 million and $56.9 million at July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments as of July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Balance Sheet Location

July 4,
2010
December 31,
2009
(in thousands)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange contracts

Prepayments and other current assets $ 409 $

Foreign exchange contracts

Other accrued liabilities 143
$ 409 $ 143

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments in the statement of operations recognized during the three and six months ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009. The table does not reflect the corresponding gain (loss) from the hedged balance sheet.

Location of Losses
Recognized in Statement
of Operations
For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange contracts

Interest expense and other $ (538 ) $ (425 ) $ (1,263 ) $ (2,386 )
$ (538 ) $ (425 ) $ (1,263 ) $ (2,386 )

See Debt footnote E regarding derivatives related to convertible senior notes.

E. Debt

Loan Agreement

On March 31, 2009, Teradyne K.K., Teradyne’s wholly-owned subsidiary in Japan, entered into a loan agreement with a local bank in Japan to borrow approximately $10.0 million. The loan has a term of 5 years and a fixed interest rate of 1.4%. Approximately $6.0 million of the loan is collateralized by a real estate mortgage on

13


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Teradyne K.K.’s building and land in Kumamoto, Japan and approximately $4.0 million is unsecured. Teradyne, Inc. has guaranteed payment of the loan obligation. The loan is amortized over the term of the loan with semiannual principal payments of approximately $1.0 million payable on September 30 and March 30 each year. At July 4, 2010, approximately $2.3 million of the outstanding loan principal is included in current debt and approximately $6.9 million is classified as long-term debt.

Convertible Senior Notes

On March 31, 2009, Teradyne entered into an underwriting agreement regarding a public offering of $175 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% convertible senior notes due March 15, 2014 (the “Notes”). On April 1, 2009, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional $15 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes for a total aggregate principal amount of $190 million. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.50% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2009. The Notes will mature on March 15, 2014, unless earlier repurchased by Teradyne or converted. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of Teradyne’s existing and future senior debt and senior to any of Teradyne’s subordinated debt.

The Notes may be converted, under certain circumstances and during certain periods, at an initial conversion rate of approximately 182.65 shares of Teradyne’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $5.48, a 25% conversion premium based on the last reported sale price of $4.38 per share of Teradyne’s common stock on March 31, 2009. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

Holders may convert their Notes at their option prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding December 15, 2013, under the following circumstances: (1) during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the price per Note for each day of that measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of Teradyne’s common stock and the conversion rate for such date; (2) during any calendar quarter, if the last reported sale price of Teradyne’s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds 130% of the applicable conversion price in effect on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter; or (3) upon the occurrence of certain specified events. Additionally, the Notes are convertible during the last three months prior to the March 15, 2014 maturity date. Upon conversion, holders will receive, at Teradyne’s option, shares of Teradyne common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of Teradyne common stock, subject to Teradyne’s option to irrevocably elect to settle all future conversions in cash up to the principal amount of the Notes and shares of common stock for any excess.

During the three months ended July 4, 2010, the following circumstance that allows holders to convert their Notes at their option prior to December 15, 2013 occurred: the last reported sale price of Teradyne’s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeded 130% of the conversion price in effect on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter. As of August 12, 2010, no holders have exercised their option to convert their Notes.

Teradyne may not redeem the Notes prior to their maturity. Holders of the Notes may require Teradyne to purchase in cash all or a portion of their Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes involving Teradyne (which include, among others, the liquidation or dissolution of Teradyne, the acquisition of 50% or more of the total voting shares of Teradyne, certain mergers and consolidations, and the delisting of Teradyne’s stock).

14


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Concurrently with the offering of the Notes, Teradyne entered into a convertible note hedge transaction with a strike price equal to the initial conversion price of the Notes, or approximately $5.48. The convertible note hedge allows Teradyne to receive shares of its common stock and/or cash related to the excess conversion value that it would pay to the holders of the Notes upon conversion. The convertible note hedges will cover, subject to customary antidilution adjustments, approximately 34,703,196 shares of Teradyne’s common stock. Teradyne paid approximately $64.6 million for the convertible note hedges.

Separately, Teradyne entered into a warrant transaction with a strike price of approximately $7.67 per share, which is 75% higher than the closing price of Teradyne’s common stock on March 31, 2009. The warrants will be net share settled and will cover, subject to customary antidilution adjustments, approximately 34,703,196 shares of Teradyne’s common stock. Teradyne received approximately $43.0 million for the warrants.

The convertible notes hedge and warrant transaction will generally have the effect of increasing the conversion price of the Notes to approximately $7.67 per share of Teradyne’s common stock, representing a 75% conversion premium based upon the closing price of Teradyne’s common stock on March 31, 2009.

The notes are classified as long-term debt in the balance sheet at July 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The below tables represent the components of Teradyne’s convertible senior notes:

July 4,
2010
December 31,
2009
(in thousands)

Debt principal

$ 190,000 $ 190,000

Unamortized debt discount

51,373 56,446

Net carrying amount of the convertible debt

$ 138,627 $ 133,554

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Contractual interest expense on the coupon

$ 2,138 $ 2,161 $ 4,371 $ 2,161

Amortization of the discount component and debt issue fees

2,783 2,455 5,480 2,455

Total interest expense on the convertible debt

$ 4,921 $ 4,616 $ 9,851 $ 4,616

As of July 4, 2010, the unamortized discount was $51.4 million, which will be amortized over approximately 3.75 years, and the carrying amount of the equity component was $63.4 million. As of July 4, 2010, the conversion rate was equal to the initial conversion price of approximately $5.48 per share and the if-converted value of the Notes was $329.0 million.

Revolving Credit Facility

On April 7, 2009, Teradyne terminated its revolving credit facility agreement. Teradyne used approximately $123.3 million of the net proceeds of the Notes offering to repay $122.5 million of principal and $0.8 million of accrued interest outstanding under the revolving credit facility agreement.

15


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

F. Deferred Revenue and Customer Advances

Deferred revenue and customer advances consist of:

July 4,
2010
December 31,
2009
(in thousands)

Customer advances

$ 6,420 $ 72,569

Maintenance and training

29,468 22,616

Undelivered elements

2,273 5,551

Acceptance

1,306 530

Other

1,984 3,173

Total deferred revenue and customer advances

$ 41,451 $ 104,439

G. Product Warranty

Teradyne generally provides a one-year warranty on its products commencing upon installation or shipment. A provision is recorded upon revenue recognition to cost of revenues for estimated warranty expense based on historical experience. Related costs are charged to the warranty accrual as incurred. The balance below is included in other accrued liabilities.

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period

$ 8,851 $ 6,013 $ 7,086 $ 8,372

Accruals for warranties issued during the period

5,276 1,777 8,974 3,174

Accruals related to pre-existing warranties

(241 ) (212 ) 337 (997 )

Settlements made during the period

(2,824 ) (2,567 ) (5,335 ) (5,538 )

Balance at end of period

$ 11,062 $ 5,011 $ 11,062 $ 5,011

When Teradyne receives revenue for extended warranties beyond one year, it is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period. Related costs are expensed as incurred. The balance below is included in deferred revenue and customer advances and long-term other accrued liabilities.

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period

$ 4,470 $ 5,317 $ 4,055 $ 6,369

Deferral of new extended warranty revenue

1,581 600 3,215 877

Recognition of extended warranty deferred revenue

(408 ) (1,270 ) (1,627 ) (2,599 )

Balance at end of period

$ 5,643 $ 4,647 $ 5,643 $ 4,647

16


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

H. Stock-Based Compensation

During the six months ended July 4, 2010, Teradyne granted service-based restricted stock units to employees, and service-based stock options and service and performance-based restricted stock units to executive officers. The total number of restricted stock units granted was 2.6 million at the weighted average grant date fair value of $9.42. Service-based restricted stock units granted to employees and executive officers vest in equal installments over four years. The percentage level of performance satisfied for performance-based grants is assessed on or near the anniversary of the grant date and, in turn, that percentage level determines the number of performance-based restricted stock units available for vesting over the vesting period; portions of the performance-based grants not available for vesting are forfeited. The total number of stock options granted to executive officers was 0.3 million at the weighted average grant date fair value of $4.10. These stock options vest in equal installments over four years, and have a term of seven years from the date of grant.

During the six months ended July 5, 2009, Teradyne granted service-based restricted stock units to employees, and service-based restricted stock units and stock options to executive officers. The total number of restricted stock units granted was 4.2 million at the weighted average grant date fair value of $4.90. The total number of stock options granted was 1.1 million at the weighted average grant date fair value of $1.97. Restricted stock units and stock options vest in equal installments over four years. These stock options have a term of seven years from the date of grant.

The fair value of stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009

Expected life (years)

4.75 4.75

Interest rate

2.4 % 1.6 %

Volatility-historical

48.8 % 44.9 %

Dividend yield

0.0 % 0.0 %

Teradyne determined the stock options’ expected life based upon historical exercise data for executive officers, the age of the executive officers and the terms of the stock option grant. Volatility was determined using historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life. The risk-free rate was determined using the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

17


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

I. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is calculated as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Net income (loss)

$ 122,149 $ (66,768 ) $ 172,249 $ (157,436 )

Foreign currency translation adjustment

210 1,214 (363 ) 1,594

Unrealized (loss) gain on investments, net of tax of $0

(401 ) 12 296 1,707

Actuarial gains (losses) arising during period, net of tax of $1,121, $(984), $1,247 and $(984)

17,202 (1,458 ) 17,587 (10,095 )

Amortization included in net periodic pension and post-retirements costs:

Actuarial losses, net of tax of $45, $55, $90 and $102

952 1,017 2,707 2,100

Prior service costs, net of tax of $0

122 138 246 287

Comprehensive income (loss)

$ 140,234 $ (65,845 ) $ 192,722 $ (161,843 )

J. Intangible Assets

Amortizable intangible assets consist of the following and are included in intangible assets on the balance sheet:

July 4, 2010
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Weighted
Average
Useful Life
(in thousands)

Developed technology

$ 121,055 $ 56,722 $ 64,333 6.1 years

Customer relationships and service and software maintenance contracts

91,271 27,468 63,803 8.6 years

Trade names and trademarks

14,840 5,454 9,386 11.5 years

Total intangible assets

$ 227,166 $ 89,644 $ 137,522 7.6 years
December 31, 2009
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Weighted
Average
Useful Life
(in thousands)

Developed technology

$ 121,055 $ 47,746 $ 73,309 6.1 years

Customer relationships and service and software maintenance contracts

91,271 22,187 69,084 8.6 years

Trade names and trademarks

14,840 5,041 9,799 11.5 years

Total intangible assets

$ 227,166 $ 74,974 $ 152,192 7.6 years

18


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was $7.3 million and $14.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended July 4, 2010 and $8.2 million and $16.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009. Estimated intangible asset amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

Year

Amount
(in thousands)

2010 (remainder)

$ 14,583

2011

27,821

2012

25,732

2013

24,683

2014

21,598

K. Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net income (loss) for basic net income (loss) per share

$ 122,149 $ (66,768 ) $ 172,249 $ (157,436 )

Income impact of assumed conversion of convertible notes

4,379 8,766

Net income (loss) for diluted net income (loss) per share

$ 126,528 $ (66,768 ) $ 181,015 $ (157,436 )

Shares used in net income (loss) per common share-basic

179,990 173,022 178,429 172,576

Effect of dilutive potential common shares:

Incremental shares from assumed conversion of convertible note

34,703 34,703

Warrants

11,225 10,174

Restricted stock units

2,924 2,896

Stock options

2,571 2,635

Stock purchase rights

128 72

Dilutive potential common shares

51,551 50,480

Shares used in net income (loss) per common share-diluted

231,541 173,022 228,909 172,576

Net income (loss) per common share-basic

$ 0.68 $ (0.39 ) $ 0.97 $ (0.91 )

Net income (loss) per common share-diluted

$ 0.55 $ (0.39 ) $ 0.79 $ (0.91 )

The computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended July 4, 2010 excludes the effect of the potential exercise of options to purchase approximately 4.5 million and 6.0 million shares and restricted stock units of 0.1 million and 0.4 million shares, respectively, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The computation of diluted net loss per common share for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 excludes all outstanding stock options, restricted stock units and warrants because Teradyne had a net loss and inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

19


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Teradyne’s call option on its common stock (convertible note hedge transaction) is excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because the effect would be anti-dilutive. See Debt footnote E regarding convertible note hedge transaction.

L. Restructuring and Other, Net

Restructuring

In response to a downturn in the industry, Teradyne initiated restructuring activities across all segments to reduce costs, principally through headcount reductions and facility consolidations. The tables below represent activity related to these actions. The remaining accrual for severance and benefits is reflected in the accrued employees’ compensation and withholdings account on the balance sheet and is expected to be paid by the end of 2010. The remaining accrual for lease payments on vacated facilities is reflected in the other accrued liabilities account and the long-term other accrued liabilities account and is expected to be paid over the lease terms, the latest of which expires in 2013. Teradyne expects to pay approximately $3.7 million against the lease accruals over the next twelve months. Teradyne’s future lease commitments are net of expected sublease income of $4.5 million as of July 4, 2010.

Severance and Benefits:

Pre-2009
Actions
Q1 2009
Actions
Q2 2009
Actions
Q1 2010
Actions
Q2 2010
Actions
Total
(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2008

$ 5,423 $ $ $ $ $ 5,423

Provision

17,630 15,940 33,570

Cash payments

(5,423 ) (17,630 ) (13,035 ) (36,088 )

Balance at December 31, 2009

2,905 2,905

Provision

766 766

Change in estimate

498 498

Cash payments

(2,079 ) (573 ) (2,652 )

Balance at April 4, 2010

1,324 193 1,517

Provision

845 845

Change in estimate

(96 ) (5 ) (101 )

Cash payments

(695 ) (188 ) (387 ) (1,270 )

Balance at July 4, 2010

$ $ $ 533 $ $ 458 $ 991

20


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Facility Exit Costs:

Pre-2009
Actions
Q3 2009
Actions
Q2 2010
Actions
Total
(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2008

$ 9,303 $ $ $ 9,303

Provision

4,420 4,420

Change in estimate

(417 ) (417 )

Cash payments

(2,645 ) (285 ) (2,930 )

Other

100 100

Balance at December 31, 2009

6,241 4,235 10,476

Cash payments

(468 ) (272 ) (740 )

Balance at April 4, 2010

5,773 3,963 9,736

Provision

815 815

Cash payments

(553 ) (264 ) (817 )

Balance at July 4, 2010

$ 5,220 $ 3,699 $ 815 $ 9,734

During the six months ended July 4, 2010, Teradyne recorded restructuring charges related to ongoing efforts to lower expenses and its cost structure and an additional charge due to a change in estimated severance benefits related to a prior period activity. The restructuring charges consisted of the following activities:

Q1 2010 Actions:

$0.8 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 14 people, of which $0.4 million and 10 people were in Systems Test Group and $0.4 million and 4 people were in Semiconductor Test.

Q2 2010 Actions:

$0.8 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 10 people in Systems Test Group; and

$0.8 million of facility charges in Systems Test Group related to the early exit of leased facilities in Kontich, Belgium and Stockport, United Kingdom.

Q2 2009 Actions:

$0.4 million related to a change in the estimated severance benefits related to headcount reduction activities across both segments.

During the six months ended July 5, 2009, Teradyne recorded restructuring charges related to ongoing efforts to lower expenses and its cost structure in light of the industry wide decline in orders for semiconductor equipment. The restructuring charges consisted of the following activities:

Q2 2009 Actions:

$14.1 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 316 people, of which $9.7 million and 267 people were in Semiconductor Test, $2.7 million and 25 people were in Corporate, and $1.7 million and 24 people were in Systems Test Group.

21


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Q1 2009 Actions:

$17.6 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 518 people, of which $14.9 million and 460 people were in Semiconductor Test, $1.9 million and 42 people were in Systems Test Group, and $0.8 million and 16 people were in Corporate.

Other

During the six months ended July 5, 2009, Teradyne recorded the following activity:

$1.1 million of long-lived asset impairment charges across both segments primarily related to disposal of fixed assets as a result of the consolidation of Teradyne’s facilities in North Reading, Massachusetts; and

$(1.5) million of credits related to finalization of certain Eagle Test purchase accounting items.

M. Retirement Plans

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Teradyne has defined benefit pension plans covering a portion of domestic employees and employees of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Benefits under these plans are based on employees’ years of service and compensation. Teradyne’s funding policy is to make contributions to these plans in accordance with local laws and to the extent that such contributions are tax deductible. The assets of these plans consist primarily of equity and fixed income securities. In addition, Teradyne has an unfunded supplemental executive defined benefit plan in the United States to provide retirement benefits in excess of levels allowed by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code, as well as unfunded foreign plans.

Components of net periodic pension cost for all plans for the three and six months ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009 were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Service cost

$ 953 $ 877 $ 2,015 $ 1,995

Interest cost

4,280 4,688 8,840 9,176

Expected return on plan assets

(5,273 ) (4,836 ) (10,140 ) (9,706 )

Amortization of unrecognized:

Prior service cost

181 197 363 404

Net loss

1,022 1,013 2,768 2,088

Curtailment gain

(111 )

Settlement loss

1,550 1,550

Total net periodic pension cost

$ 1,163 $ 3,489 $ 3,846 $ 5,396

In the six months ended July 4, 2010, Teradyne made a $20.0 million discretionary contribution to the U.S. Qualified Pension Plan. On August 4, 2010 Teradyne made an additional $15.0 million discretionary contribution to the U.S. Qualified Pension Plan.

22


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

In addition to receiving pension benefits, U.S. Teradyne employees who meet early retirement eligibility requirements as of their termination dates may participate in Teradyne’s Welfare Plan, which includes death, and medical and dental benefits up to age 65. Death benefits provide a fixed sum to retirees’ survivors and are available to all retirees. Substantially all of Teradyne’s current U.S. employees (including executive officers) could become eligible for these benefits, and the existing benefit obligation relates primarily to those employees.

Components of net periodic post-retirement cost were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Service cost

$ 7 $ 15 $ 27 $ 55

Interest cost

174 268 392 546

Amortization of unrecognized:

Prior service benefit

(59 ) (59 ) (117 ) (117 )

Net (gain) loss

(25 ) 59 29 114

Total net periodic post-retirement cost

$ 97 $ 283 $ 331 $ 598

N. Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Commitments

As of July 4, 2010, Teradyne had entered into purchase commitments for certain components and materials. The purchase commitments are for less than one year and aggregate to approximately $277.3 million.

Legal Claims

Teradyne is subject to various legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on Teradyne’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

23


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

O. Segment Information

Teradyne’s two reportable segments are Semiconductor Test and Systems Test Group. The Semiconductor Test segment includes operations related to the design, manufacturing and marketing of semiconductor test products and services. The Systems Test Group segment includes operations related to the design, manufacturing and marketing of products and services for military/aerospace instrumentation test, hard disk drive test, circuit-board test and inspection, and automotive diagnostic and test.

Teradyne evaluates performance based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is business segment income before income taxes. The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in Note B: “Accounting Policies” in Teradyne’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Segment information is as follows:

Semiconductor
Test
Systems
Test Group
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Consolidated
(in thousands)

Three months ended July 4, 2010:

Net revenues

$ 413,059 $ 41,717 $ $ 454,776

Income (loss) before income taxes(1)(2)

143,469 (6,994 ) (4,783 ) 131,692

Three months ended July 5, 2009:

Net revenues

$ 102,820 $ 66,760 $ $ 169,580

Loss before income taxes(1)(2)

(56,222 ) (2,474 ) (10,272 ) (68,968 )

Six months ended July 4, 2010:

Net revenues

$ 702,736 $ 81,663 $ $ 784,399

Income (loss) before income taxes(1)(2)

209,558 (12,593 ) (10,343 ) 186,622

Six months ended July 5, 2009:

Net revenues

$ 181,347 $ 108,841 $ $ 290,188

Loss before income taxes(1)(2)

(143,163 ) (7,870 ) (16,403 ) (167,436 )

(1) Interest income and interest expense and other are included in Corporate and Eliminations.

(2) Included in the income before income taxes for each of the segments are charges for the three and six months ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009 that include restructuring and other, net, inventory step-up amortization and provision for excess and obsolete inventory, as follows:

Included in the Semiconductor Test segment are charges for the following:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Cost of revenues—provision for excess and obsolete inventory

$ $ 8,984 $ 496 $ 14,614

Cost of revenues—sale of previously written down inventory

(4,639 ) (4,639 )

Cost of revenues—inventory step-up

3,924 5,163

Restructuring and other, net

11,324 1,082 24,671

Total

$ (4,639 ) $ 24,232 $ (3,061 ) $ 44,448

24


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Included in the Systems Test Group segment are charges for the following:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Cost of revenues—provision for excess and obsolete inventory

$ 301 $ 2,507 $ 1,169 $ 5,474

Cost of revenues—sale of previously written down inventory

(593 ) (593 )

Restructuring and other, net

1,737 1,486 1,919 3,463

Total

$ 1,445 $ 3,993 $ 2,495 $ 8,937

Included in the Corporate and Eliminations segment are charges for the following:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in thousands)

Restructuring and other, net

$ (37 ) $ 2,460 $ (37 ) $ 3,101

Total

$ (37 ) $ 2,460 $ (37 ) $ 3,101

25


Table of Contents
Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q which are not historical facts, so called “forward looking statements,” are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Investors are cautioned that all forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Teradyne’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See also Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. Teradyne assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law.

Overview

Teradyne is a leading global supplier of automatic test equipment. We design, develop, manufacture, and sell automatic test systems and solutions used to test complex electronics in the consumer electronics, automotive, computing, telecommunications, and aerospace and defense industries. Our automatic test equipment products and services include:

semiconductor test (“Semiconductor Test”) systems; and

military/aerospace (“Mil/Aero”) test instrumentation and systems, hard disk drive test (“HDD”) systems, circuit-board test and inspection (“Commercial Board Test”) systems, and automotive diagnostic and test (“Diagnostic Solutions”) systems (collectively these products represent “Systems Test Group”).

We have a broad customer base which includes integrated device manufacturers (“IDMs”), outsourced sub-assembly and test providers (“OSATs”), wafer foundries, fabless companies that design, but contract with others for the manufacture of integrated circuits (“ICs”), manufacturers of circuit boards, automotive companies, HDD manufacturers, aerospace and military contractors as well as the United States Department of Defense.

The sales of our products and services are dependent, to a large degree, on customers who are subject to cyclical trends in the demand for their products. These cyclical periods have had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on our business since our customers often delay or accelerate purchases in reaction to changes in their businesses and to demand fluctuations in the semiconductor industry. Historically, these demand fluctuations have resulted in significant variations in our results of operations. This was particularly relevant beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 where we saw a significant decrease in revenue in our Semiconductor Test business which was impacted by the deteriorating global economy, which negatively impacted the entire semiconductor industry. The sharp swings in the semiconductor industry in recent years have generally affected the semiconductor test equipment and services industry more significantly than the overall capital equipment sector.

In response to the business downturn, we implemented significant permanent and temporary cost reduction measures. We reduced headcount worldwide, cut capital spending, and imposed temporary salary reductions and furloughs on our workforce. Due to the continued improvement in our business, we removed the temporary salary reductions and furloughs by the end of last year. We believe the permanent cost-cutting measures we took in the last two years will be of long term value.

In the last three quarters, we have experienced improvement in our semiconductor test business. We believe our acquisitions of Nextest and Eagle Test and our entry into the high speed memory and HDD markets have enhanced our opportunities for growth. We will continue to invest in our business in anticipation of a broader recovery in our markets and to expand further our addressable markets while tightly managing our costs. As the last three quarters have demonstrated, with our current cost structure, we can achieve significantly higher profitability than we achieved at comparable revenue levels in the past.

26


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We have identified the policies which are critical to understanding our business and our results of operations. Except as stated below, management believes that there have been no significant changes during the six months ended July 4, 2010 to the items disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Revenue Recognition

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition to remove tangible products containing non-software and software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality from the scope of industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance. In October 2009, the FASB also amended the accounting standards for arrangements with multiple deliverables. We elected to early adopt this accounting guidance at the beginning of our first quarter of 2010 on a prospective basis. Adoption had no material impact on our financial position or results of operations in the three and six months ended July 4, 2010.

We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, title and risk of loss have passed, delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss generally pass to our customers upon shipment or at delivery destination point. In circumstances where either title or risk of loss pass upon destination, acceptance or cash payment, we defer revenue recognition until such events occur.

Our equipment has non-software and software components that function together to deliver the equipment’s essential functionality. Revenue is recognized upon shipment or at delivery destination point, provided that customer acceptance criteria can be demonstrated prior to shipment. Certain contracts require us to perform tests of the product to ensure that performance meets the published product specifications or customer requested specifications, which are generally conducted prior to shipment. Where the criteria cannot be demonstrated prior to shipment, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance has been received. We also defer the portion of the sales price that is not due until acceptance, which represents deferred profit.

For multiple element arrangements, we allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, a hierarchy is used to determine the selling price for allocating revenue to deliverables as follows: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”), and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (“BESP”). For a delivered item to be considered a separate unit, the delivered item must have value to the customer on a standalone basis and the delivery or performance of the undelivered item must be considered probable and substantially in our control.

Our post-shipment obligations include installation, training services, one-year standard warranties, and extended warranties. Installation does not alter the product capabilities, does not require specialized skills or tools and can be performed by the customers or other vendors. Installation is typically provided within five days of product shipment and is completed within one to two days thereafter. Training services are optional and do not affect the customer’s ability to use the product. We defer revenue for the selling price of installation and training.

27


Table of Contents

SELECTED RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009

Percentage of total net revenues:

Net revenue:

Products

86 % 68 % 84 % 62 %

Services

14 32 16 38

Total net revenues

100 100 100 100

Cost of revenues:

Cost of products

37 55 37 51

Cost of services

7 17 8 21

Total cost of revenues

44 72 45 72

Gross profit

56 28 55 28

Operating expenses:

Engineering and development

11 23 13 30

Selling and administrative

13 28 15 35

Acquired intangible asset amortization

2 5 2 5

Restructuring and other, net

0 8 0 11

Total operating expenses

26 64 30 81

Income (loss) from operations

30 (36 ) 25 (53 )

Interest & other

(1 ) (4 ) (1 ) (4 )

Income (loss) before income taxes

29 (40 ) 24 (57 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

2 (1 ) 2 (3 )

Net income (loss)

27 % (39 )% 22 % (54 )%

Provision/benefit for income taxes as percentage of income (loss) before income taxes

7 % 3 % 8 % 6 %

Results of Operations

Second Quarter 2010 Compared to Second Quarter 2009

Book to Bill Ratio

Book to bill ratio is calculated as net bookings divided by net sales. Book to bill ratio by reportable segment was as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009

Semiconductor Test

1.1 1.3

Systems Test Group

1.1 1.3

Total Company

1.1 1.3

28


Table of Contents

Revenue

Net revenues for our two reportable segments were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Semiconductor Test

$ 413.1 $ 102.8 $ 310.3

Systems Test Group

41.7 66.8 (25.1 )
$ 454.8 $ 169.6 $ 285.2

Net revenues increased by $285.2 million or 168%, primarily due to the increase in Semiconductor Test revenue of $310.3 million or 302%, as a result of higher sales across all System on a Chip products with power management, microcontroller and mobile/wireless being the strongest. Systems Test Group revenue was down by $25.1 million or 38%, primarily due to the decrease in sales of HDD test systems, Mil/Aero test instrumentation and Diagnostic Solutions systems.

Our revenues by region as a percentage of total net revenue were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009

Taiwan

23 % 11 %

United States

14 27

Singapore

10 10

Philippines

10 7

Malaysia

10 3

China

9 4

Korea

8 3

Europe

6 11

Thailand

5 17

Japan

4 5

Rest of World

1 2
100 % 100 %

Gross Profit

Our gross profit was as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar/Point
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Gross Profit

$ 254.3 $ 47.1 $ 207.2

Percent of Total Revenue

55.9 % 27.8 % 28.1

Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased 28.1 percentage points. This increase in gross profit was the result of an increase of 18.8 points from higher sales volume, an increase of 11.6 points related to mix and an increase of 2.9 points from lower inventory provisions. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of 1.1 points primarily due to higher variable compensation.

29


Table of Contents

We assess the carrying value of our inventory on a quarterly basis by estimating future demand and comparing that demand against on-hand and on-order inventory positions. Forecasted revenue information is obtained from the sales and marketing groups and incorporates factors such as backlog and future revenue demand. This quarterly process identifies obsolete and excess inventory. Obsolete inventory, which represents items for which there is no demand, is fully reserved. Excess inventory, which represents inventory items that are not expected to be consumed during the next four quarters, is written-down to estimated net realizable value.

During the three months ended July 4, 2010, we recorded an inventory provision of $0.3 million included in cost of revenues in the Systems Test Group.

During the three months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded an inventory provision of $8.6 million included in cost of revenues, due to the following factors:

Downward revisions to previously forecasted demand levels as a result of worsening economic conditions experienced in the semiconductor and automotive industries in the second quarter of 2009 resulted in an inventory provision of $5.2 million for inventory not expected to be consumed; and

A decline in demand versus forecast for our Liquid Crystal Display (“LCD”) test product due to the global economic downturn, lower product pricing by competitors, the introduction of a new product by a competitor and consolidation among a number of the expected buyers of the product, resulted in an inventory provision of $3.4 million.

During the three months ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009, we scrapped $1.1 million and $0.9 million of inventory, respectively. During the three months ended July 4, 2010, we sold $5.2 million of previously written-down or written-off inventory. As of July 4, 2010, we had inventory related reserves for amounts which had been written-down or written-off totaling $126.3 million. We have no pre-determined timeline to scrap the remaining inventory.

Engineering and Development

Engineering and development expenses were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Engineering and Development

$ 50.4 $ 38.5 $ 11.9

Percent of Total Revenue

11.1 % 22.7 %

The increase of $11.9 million in engineering and development expenses is due primarily to a $7.2 million increase in variable compensation and $1.5 million due to the restoration of temporary pay cuts.

Selling and Administrative

Selling and administrative expenses were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Selling and Administrative

$ 58.3 $ 47.3 $ 11.0

Percent of Total Revenue

12.8 % 27.9 %

30


Table of Contents

The increase of $11.0 million in selling and administrative expenses is due primarily to a $10.7 million increase in variable compensation, and $3.0 million due to the restoration of temporary pay cuts, partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in spending related to workforce reductions and other cost reduction initiatives taken in 2009.

Restructuring and Other, Net

Restructuring

In response to a downturn in the industry, we initiated restructuring activities across all segments to reduce costs, principally through headcount reductions and facility consolidations. The table below represents activity related to these actions. The remaining accrual for severance and benefits is reflected in the accrued employees’ compensation and withholdings account on the balance sheet and is expected to be paid by the end of 2010. The remaining accrual for lease payments on vacated facilities is reflected in the other accrued liabilities account and the long-term other accrued liabilities account and is expected to be paid over the lease terms, the latest of which expires in 2013. We expect to pay approximately $3.7 million against the lease accruals over the next twelve months. Our future lease commitments are net of expected sublease income of $4.5 million as of July 4, 2010.

Severance and Benefits:

Pre-2009
Actions
Q1 2009
Actions
Q2 2009
Actions
Q1 2010
Actions
Q2 2010
Actions
Total
(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2008

$ 5,423 $ $ $ $ $ 5,423

Provision

17,630 15,940 33,570

Cash payments

(5,423 ) (17,630 ) (13,035 ) (36,088 )

Balance at December 31, 2009

2,905 2,905

Provision

766 766

Change in estimate

498 498

Cash payments

(2,079 ) (573 ) (2,652 )

Balance at April 4, 2010

1,324 193 1,517

Provision

845 845

Change in estimate

(96 ) (5 ) (101 )

Cash payments

(695 ) (188 ) (387 ) (1,270 )

Balance at July 4, 2010

$ $ $ 533 $ $ 458 $ 991

Facility Exit Costs:

Pre-2009
Actions
Q3 2009
Actions
Q2 2010
Actions
Total
(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2008

$ 9,303 $ $ $ 9,303

Provision

4,420 4,420

Change in estimate

(417 ) (417 )

Cash payments

(2,645 ) (285 ) (2,930 )

Other

100 100

Balance at December 31, 2009

6,241 4,235 10,476

Cash payments

(468 ) (272 ) (740 )

Balance at April 4, 2010

5,773 3,963 9,736

Provision

815 815

Cash payments

(553 ) (264 ) (817 )

Balance at July 4, 2010

$ 5,220 $ 3,699 $ 815 $ 9,734

31


Table of Contents

During the three months ended July 4, 2010, we recorded restructuring charges related to ongoing efforts to lower expenses and our cost structure. The restructuring charges consisted of the following activities:

Q2 2010 Actions:

$0.8 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 10 people in Systems Test Group; and

$0.8 million of facility charges in Systems Test Group related to the early exit of leased facilities in Kontich, Belgium and Stockport, United Kingdom.

During the three months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded restructuring charges related to ongoing efforts to lower expenses and our cost structure in light of the industry wide decline in orders for semiconductor equipment. The restructuring charges consisted of the following activities:

Q2 2009 Actions:

$14.1 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 316 people, of which $9.7 million and 267 people were in Semiconductor Test, $2.7 million and 25 people were in Corporate, and $1.7 million and 24 people were in Systems Test Group.

Q1 2009 Actions:

$0.9 million for a change in the estimated severance benefits related to headcount reduction activities in Semiconductor Test.

Other

During the three months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded the following activity:

$1.1 million of long-lived asset impairment charges across both segments primarily related to disposal of fixed assets as a result of the consolidation of our facilities in North Reading, Massachusetts; and

$(0.8) million of credits related to finalization of certain Eagle Test purchase accounting items.

Interest and Other

Interest income increased by $2.5 million from the second quarter of 2009 to 2010 due primarily to a gain from the sale of auction rate securities. Interest expense and other increased by $0.5 million from the second quarter of 2009 to 2010. Interest expense and other for the second quarter of 2010 included $4.9 million of interest expense related to our convertible debt and a loss of $2.7 million on the exercise of the auction rate securities related UBS Put. Interest expense and other for the second quarter of 2009 included $4.6 million of interest expense related to our convertible debt and a loss of $2.5 million related to the write off of the remaining debt issue costs due to the termination of our revolving credit facility agreement.

Income Taxes

For the three months ended July 4, 2010, we recorded a tax provision of $9.5 million, which consisted primarily of foreign taxes. For the three months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded a tax benefit of $2.2 million primarily due to benefiting operating losses in foreign jurisdictions. Due to the continued uncertainty of realization, we have maintained our valuation allowance at July 4, 2010 for deferred tax assets in the U.S. and Singapore. We do not expect to significantly reduce our valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists, including sustained profitability, that realization is more likely than not.

32


Table of Contents

Six Months of 2010 Compared to Six Months of 2009

Revenue

Net revenues for our two reportable segments were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Semiconductor Test

$ 702.7 $ 181.4 $ 521.3

Systems Test Group

81.7 108.8 (27.1 )
$ 784.4 $ 290.2 $ 494.2

Net revenues increased by $494.2 million or 170%, primarily due to the increase in Semiconductor Test revenue of $521.3 million or 287%, as a result of higher sales across all System on a Chip products with power management, microcontroller and mobile/wireless being the strongest. System Test Group revenue was down by $27.1 million or 25%, primarily due to the decrease in sales of HDD test systems and Mil/Aero test instrumentation.

Our revenues by region as a percentage of total net revenue were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009

Taiwan

24 % 10 %

United States

16 32

Singapore

11 8

Philippines

10 5

Malaysia

9 4

China

8 5

Europe

6 13

Thailand

6 10

Korea

5 3

Japan

4 7

Rest of World

1 3
100 % 100 %

Gross Profit

Our gross profit was as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar/Point
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Gross Profit

$ 427.8 $ 80.5 $ 347.3

Percent of Total Revenue

54.5 % 27.7 % 26.8

Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased 26.8 percentage points. This increase in gross profit was the result of an increase of 19.3 points from higher sales volume, an increase of 8.6 points related to mix and an increase of 2.6 points from lower inventory provisions. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of 1.3 points primarily due to higher variable compensation.

33


Table of Contents

We assess the carrying value of our inventory on a quarterly basis by estimating future demand and comparing that demand against on-hand and on-order inventory positions. Forecasted revenue information is obtained from the sales and marketing groups and incorporates factors such as backlog and future revenue demand. This quarterly process identifies obsolete and excess inventory. Obsolete inventory, which represents items for which there is no demand, is fully reserved. Excess inventory, which represents inventory items that are not expected to be consumed during the next four quarters, is written-down to estimated net realizable value.

During the six months ended July 4, 2010, we recorded an inventory provision of $1.7 million included in cost of revenues, of which $1.2 million was related to Systems Test Group and $0.5 million was related to Semiconductor Test.

During the six months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded an inventory provision of $17.2 million included in cost of revenues, due to the following factors:

Downward revisions to previously forecasted demand levels as a result of worsening economic conditions experienced in the semiconductor and automotive industries in the second quarter of 2009 resulted in an inventory provision of $11.1 million for inventory not expected to be consumed; and

A decline in demand versus forecast for our Liquid Crystal Display (“LCD”) test product due to the global economic downturn, lower product pricing by competitors, the introduction of a new product by a competitor and consolidation among a number of the expected buyers of the product, resulted in an inventory provision of $3.4 million; and

During late 2008, we introduced the next versions of our Nextest Magnum memory test product. At that time, it was anticipated that demand would continue for the existing version of the product within its installed base of customers. An overall decline in the memory market combined with a portion of our customers accelerating their purchasing of the newer version of the product resulted in an inventory provision of $2.7 million.

During the six months ended July 4, 2010 and July 5, 2009, we scrapped $2.1 million and $2.0 million of inventory, respectively. During the six months ended July 4, 2010 we sold $5.2 million of previously written-down or written-off inventory. As of July 4, 2010, we had inventory related reserves for amounts which had been written-down or written-off totaling $126.3 million. We have no pre-determined timeline to scrap the remaining inventory.

Engineering and Development

Engineering and development expenses were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Engineering and Development

$ 99.4 $ 85.6 $ 13.8

Percent of Total Revenue

12.7 % 29.5 %

The increase of $13.8 million in engineering and development expenses is due primarily to an $11.9 million increase in variable compensation and $2.5 million increase due to the restoration of temporary pay cuts.

34


Table of Contents

Selling and Administrative

Selling and administrative expenses were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Selling and Administrative

$ 114.2 $ 102.6 $ 11.6

Percent of Total Revenue

14.6 % 35.4 %

The increase of $11.6 million in selling and administrative expenses is due primarily to a $17.6 million increase in variable compensation and $5.1 million due to the restoration of temporary pay cuts, offset by an $11.1 million decrease in other spending related to workforce reductions and other cost reduction initiatives taken in 2009.

Restructuring and Other, Net

Restructuring

In response to a downturn in the industry, we initiated restructuring activities across all segments to reduce costs, principally through headcount reductions and facility consolidations. The tables below represent activity related to these actions. The remaining accrual for severance and benefits is reflected in the accrued employees’ compensation and withholdings account on the balance sheet and is expected to be paid by the end of 2010. The remaining accrual for lease payments on vacated facilities is reflected in the other accrued liabilities account and the long-term other accrued liabilities account and is expected to be paid over the lease terms, the latest of which expires in 2013. We expect to pay approximately $3.7 million against the lease accruals over the next twelve months. Our future lease commitments are net of expected sublease income of $4.5 million as of July 4, 2010.

Severance and Benefits:

Pre-2009
Actions
Q1 2009
Actions
Q2 2009
Actions
Q1 2010
Actions
Q2 2010
Actions
Total
(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2008

$ 5,423 $ $ $ $ $ 5,423

Provision

17,630 15,940 33,570

Cash payments

(5,423 ) (17,630 ) (13,035 ) (36,088 )

Balance at December 31, 2009

2,905 2,905

Provision

766 766

Change in estimate

498 498

Cash payments

(2,079 ) (573 ) (2,652 )

Balance at April 4, 2010

1,324 193 1,517

Provision

845 845

Change in estimate

(96 ) (5 ) (101 )

Cash payments

(695 ) (188 ) (387 ) (1,270 )

Balance at July 4, 2010

$ $ $ 533 $ $ 458 $ 991

35


Table of Contents

Facility Exit Costs:

Pre-2009
Actions
Q3 2009
Actions
Q2 2010
Actions
Total
(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2008

$ 9,303 $ $ $ 9,303

Provision

4,420 4,420

Change in estimate

(417 ) (417 )

Cash payments

(2,645 ) (285 ) (2,930 )

Other

100 100

Balance at December 31, 2009

6,241 4,235 10,476

Cash payments

(468 ) (272 ) (740 )

Balance at April 4, 2010

5,773 3,963 9,736

Provision

815 815

Cash payments

(553 ) (264 ) (817 )

Balance at July 4, 2010

$ 5,220 $ 3,699 $ 815 $ 9,734

During the six months ended July 4, 2010, we recorded restructuring charges related to ongoing efforts to lower expenses and our cost structure and an additional charge due to a change in estimated severance benefits related to a prior period activity. The restructuring charges consisted of the following activities:

Q1 2010 Actions:

$0.8 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 14 people, of which $0.4 million and 10 people were in Systems Test Group and $0.4 million and 4 people were in Semiconductor Test.

Q2 2010 Actions:

$0.8 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 10 people in Systems Test Group; and

$0.8 million of facility charges in Systems Test Group related to the early exit of leased facilities in Kontich, Belgium and Stockport, United Kingdom.

Q2 2009 Actions:

$0.4 million related to a change in the estimated severance benefits related to headcount reduction activities across both segments.

During the six months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded restructuring charges related to ongoing efforts to lower expenses and our cost structure in light of the industry wide decline in orders for semiconductor equipment. The restructuring charges consisted of the following activities:

Q2 2009 Actions:

$14.1 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 316 people, of which $9.7 million and 267 people were in Semiconductor Test, $2.7 million and 25 people were in Corporate, and $1.7 million and 24 people were in Systems Test Group.

Q1 2009 Actions:

$17.6 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of approximately 518 people, of which $14.9 million and 460 people were in Semiconductor Test, $1.9 million and 42 people were in Systems Test Group, and $0.8 million and 16 people were in Corporate.

36


Table of Contents

Other

During the six months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded the following activity:

$1.1 million of long-lived asset impairment charges across both segments primarily related to disposal of fixed assets as a result of the consolidation of our facilities in North Reading, Massachusetts; and

$(1.5) million of credits related to finalization of certain Eagle Test purchase accounting items.

Interest and Other

Interest income increased by $2.6 million from the first six months of 2009 to 2010 due primarily to a gain from the sale of auction rate securities. Interest expense and other increased by $0.6 million from the first six months of 2009 to 2010 due primarily to a loss of $2.7 million on the exercise of the auction rate securities related UBS Put and $5.2 million increase in interest expense related to our convertible note, partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in realized and other–than-temporary impairment losses on our marketable securities and $1.2 million decrease in foreign exchange losses. In addition, the first six months of 2009 included $2.1 million of interest expense related to the revolving credit facility and $2.5 million other expense related to the write off of the remaining debt issue costs due to the termination of our revolving credit facility agreement.

Income Taxes

For the six months ended July 4, 2010, we recorded a tax provision of $14.4 million, which consisted primarily of foreign taxes. For the six months ended July 5, 2009, we recorded a tax benefit of $10.0 million primarily due to benefiting operating losses in foreign jurisdictions. Due to the continued uncertainty of realization, we have maintained our valuation allowance at July 4, 2010 for deferred tax assets in the U.S. and Singapore. We do not expect to significantly reduce our valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists, including sustained profitability, that realization is more likely than not.

Contractual Obligations

The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of July 4, 2010:

Payments Due by Period

Purchase
Commitments
Non-cancelable
Lease
Commitments(1)
Debt Interest
on Debt
Pension
Contributions
Total
(in thousands)

2010

$ 277,332 $ 9,220 $ 1,145 $ 4,339 $ 2,426 $ 294,462

2011

16,227 2,290 8,653 27,170

2012

12,594 2,290 8,622 23,506

2013

7,279 2,290 8,590 18,159

2014

5,087 191,145 4,306 200,538

Beyond 2014

5,789 5,789

Total

$ 277,332 $ 56,196 $ 199,160 $ 34,510 $ 2,426 $ 569,624

(1) Non-cancelable lease payments have not been reduced by sublease income of $4.5 million due in the future under non-cancelable sublease agreements.

As of July 4, 2010, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit for uncertain tax positions and the accrual for the related interest, net of the federal benefit, was $9.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and was included in current and long-term other accrued liabilities. We are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of when a cash settlement will occur with tax authorities as the timing of examinations and ultimate resolutions of those examinations is uncertain.

37


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance increased $142.5 million in the first six months of 2010 to $661.3 million. Cash activity for the first six months of 2010 and 2009 was as follows:

For the six Months
Ended
July 4,
2010
July 5,
2009
(in millions)

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities:

Net income (loss), adjusted for non-cash items

$ 241.4 $ (71.3 )

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired

(106.6 ) 24.5

Total cash provided by (used for) operating activities

134.8 (46.8 )

Total cash (used for) provided by investing activities

(187.5 ) (8.1 )

Total cash provided by financing activities

40.8 64.7

Effects on exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

(0.8 ) 1.6

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

$ (12.7 ) $ 11.4

In the six months ended July 4, 2010, changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired, used cash of $106.6 million. This was due to an $82.3 million increase in operating assets and a $24.3 million decrease in operating liabilities. The increase in operating assets was due to an increase in accounts receivable of $122.8 million partially offset by a $25.1 million decrease in inventories due to higher sales volume, and a decrease in other current assets of $15.4 million. The decrease in operating liabilities consisted mainly of a $63.0 million decrease in deferred revenue due to shipments of systems prepaid by customers in 2009, a $24.7 million decrease in pension liabilities due to pension contributions, a $4.3 million decrease in other accrued expenses due to convertible note interest payment, partially offset by a $29.3 million increase in accounts payable, a $19.3 million increase in accrued employee compensation, an $11.3 million increase in accrued income taxes, and an $8.0 million increase in other accrued liabilities.

Investing activities during the six months ended July 4, 2010 used cash of $187.5 million, due to $223.8 million used for purchases of marketable securities and $35.7 million used for purchases of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by proceeds from sales of marketable securities that provided cash of $71.0 million, and proceeds from life insurance that provided cash of $1.1 million.

Financing activities during the six months ended July 4, 2010 provided cash of $40.8 million, $41.9 million was from the issuance of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans which was offset by $1.1 million of cash used for a payment on a long-term debt related to the Japan loan.

In the six months ended July 5, 2009, changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired, provided cash of $24.5 million. This was due primarily to a decrease in operating assets of $67.6 million offset by a decrease in operating liabilities of $43.1 million. The decrease in operating assets consisted mainly of a decrease in accounts receivable of $35.8 million due to lower sales volume and improved collections and a decrease in inventories of $29.5 million. The decrease in operating liabilities consisted primarily of a decrease in accounts payable, deferred revenue and other accrued expenses of $39.2 million due to lower sales volume and on-going cost reduction initiatives and retirement plan contributions of $4.0 million.

Investing activities in the six months ended July 5, 2009 used cash of $8.1 million, $17.4 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment and $3.7 million for payment of transaction fees related to the Eagle Test acquisition, partially offset by sales of marketable securities that provided cash of $11.9 million and proceeds from life insurance policies that provided cash of $1.1 million.

38


Table of Contents

Financing activities during the six months ended July 5, 2009 provided cash of $64.7 million due to approximately $163 million of net proceeds from the issuance of the senior convertible note, $10 million of long-term debt proceeds from a loan in Japan and $14.3 million from the issuance of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans. These increases were partially offset by $122.5 million of cash used for the repayment of our revolving credit facility.

We believe our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance of $661.3 million will be sufficient to meet working capital and expenditure needs for at least the next twelve months. Inflation has not had a significant long-term impact on earnings.

Equity Compensation Plans

As discussed in “Note N: Stock Based Compensation” in our 2009 Form 10-K, we have a 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and a 2006 Equity and Cash Compensation Incentive Plan (the “2006 Equity Plan”).

The purpose of the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is to encourage stock ownership by all eligible employees of Teradyne. The purpose of the 2006 Equity Plan is to provide equity ownership and compensation opportunities in Teradyne to our employees, officers, directors, consultants and/or advisors. Both plans were approved by our shareholders.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2010, FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update 2010-17, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition” , to Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition.” The guidance in this consensus allows the milestone method as an acceptable revenue recognition methodology when an arrangement includes substantive milestones. The guidance provides a definition of substantive milestone and should be applied regardless of whether the arrangement includes single or multiple deliverables or units of accounting. The scope of this consensus is limited to the transactions involving milestones relating to research and development deliverables. The guidance includes enhanced disclosure requirements about each arrangement, individual milestones and related contingent consideration, information about substantive milestones and factors considered in the determination. The consensus is effective prospectively to milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, after June 15, 2010. Early application and retrospective application are permitted. We will adopt this final consensus prospectively in January 2011 and the adoption is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

For “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” affecting Teradyne, see Item 7a. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2010. There were no material changes in our exposure to market risk from those set forth in our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such material information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

39


Table of Contents

During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

40


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A: Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K remain applicable to our business. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In November 2007, Teradyne’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) authorized a $400 million stock repurchase program. During the three months ended July 4, 2010, Teradyne did not repurchase any shares of common stock. The cumulative repurchases as of July 4, 2010 total 8.5 million shares of common stock for $102.6 million at an average price of $12.14 per share. As of November 4, 2008, the Board suspended the stock repurchase program.

The following table includes information with respect to repurchases we made of our common stock during the quarter ended July 4, 2010 (in thousands):

Period

(a) Total
Number of
Shares
(or units)
Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid per
Share (or Unit)
(c) Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
(d) Maximum Number
(or Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that may Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

April 5, 2010 – May 2, 2010

$ $ 297,375

May 3, 2010 – May 30, 2010

$ $ 297,375

May 31, 2010 – July 4, 2010

$ $ 297,375

41


Table of Contents
Item 6: Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

Description

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

42


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TERADYNE, INC.
Registrant

/s/    G REGORY R. B EECHER

Gregory R. Beecher

Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Duly Authorized Officer
and Principal Financial Officer)

August 12, 2010

43

TABLE OF CONTENTS