TER 10-Q Quarterly Report July 1, 2012 | Alphaminr

TER 10-Q Quarter ended July 1, 2012

TERADYNE, INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 d354913d10q.htm FORM 10-Q FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to

Commission File No. 001-06462

TERADYNE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Massachusetts 04-2272148

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

600 Riverpark Drive, North Reading,

Massachusetts

01864
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

978-370-2700

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s only class of Common Stock as of August 6, 2012 was 187,592,476 shares.


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

INDEX

Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited):

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011

1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended July  1, 2012 and July 3, 2011

2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011

3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended July 1, 2012 and July  3, 2011

4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 5

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 28

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 42

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures 42
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings 43

Item 1A.

Risk Factors 43

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 43

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures 43

Item 6.

Exhibits 44


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1: Financial Statements

TERADYNE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

July 1,
2012
December 31,
2011

(in thousands,

except per share amount)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 589,056 $ 573,736

Marketable securities

105,947 96,502

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,160 and $4,102 at July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively

346,124 129,330

Inventories:

Raw materials

92,994 109,315

Assemblies in process

27,078 33,856

Finished goods

17,826 16,892

137,898 160,063

Deferred tax assets

56,888 53,948

Prepayments and other current assets

80,895 86,308

Total current assets

1,316,808 1,099,887

Property, plant and equipment

827,608 798,194

Less: Accumulated depreciation

579,608 565,987

Net property, plant and equipment

248,000 232,207

Long-term marketable securities

133,750 84,407

Retirement plan assets

7,182 8,840

Intangible assets, net

356,117 392,975

Goodwill

352,778 352,778

Other assets

20,035 17,545

Total assets

$ 2,434,670 $ 2,188,639

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$ 117,343 $ 69,842

Accrued employees’ compensation and withholdings

80,118 90,427

Deferred revenue and customer advances

83,710 78,670

Contingent consideration

54,662 68,892

Other accrued liabilities

64,298 62,420

Accrued income taxes

23,218 860

Current debt

2,522 2,573

Total current liabilities

425,871 373,684

Long-term deferred revenue and customer advances

22,303 33,541

Retirement plan liabilities

77,295 76,638

Deferred tax liabilities

37,915 16,049

Long-term other accrued liabilities

20,573 23,711

Long-term debt

165,283 159,956

Total liabilities

749,240 683,579

Commitments and contingencies (Note O)

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock, $0.125 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 187,213 shares and 183,587 shares issued and outstanding at July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively

23,402 22,948

Additional paid-in capital

1,327,574 1,293,130

Accumulated other comprehensive income

5,267 4,746

Retained earnings

329,187 184,236

Total shareholders’ equity

1,685,430 1,505,060

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 2,434,670 $ 2,188,639

The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teradyne’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of the condensed

consolidated financial statements.

1


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands, except per share amount)

Net revenues:

Products

$ 480,578 $ 341,316 $ 811,469 $ 657,035

Services

67,706 69,203 133,483 130,645

Total net revenues

548,284 410,519 944,952 787,680

Cost of revenues:

Cost of products

206,498 160,403 380,499 313,283

Cost of services

32,280 35,438 64,021 66,827

Total cost of revenues

238,778 195,841 444,520 380,110

Gross profit

309,506 214,678 500,432 407,570

Operating expenses:

Engineering and development

66,532 48,392 126,667 95,536

Selling and administrative

73,366 57,880 141,143 115,611

Acquired intangible asset amortization

18,429 7,291 36,858 14,582

Restructuring and other, net

(6,262 ) 1,279 (8,087 ) 1,692

Total operating expenses

152,065 114,842 296,581 227,421

Income from operations

157,441 99,836 203,851 180,149

Interest income

874 1,403 1,767 2,690

Interest expense and other

(6,323 ) (5,316 ) (12,382 ) (11,492 )

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

151,992 95,923 193,236 171,347

Income tax provision

40,605 7,839 48,285 13,325

Income from continuing operations

111,387 88,084 144,951 158,022

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

1,436

Income tax benefit

(267 )

Income from discontinued operations

1,703

(Loss) Gain on disposal of discontinued operations (net of income tax of $0, $0, $0, $4,578, respectively)

(832 ) 24,371

Net income

$ 111,387 $ 87,252 $ 144,951 $ 184,096

Income per common share from continuing operations:

Basic

$ 0.60 $ 0.48 $ 0.78 $ 0.85

Diluted

$ 0.49 $ 0.38 $ 0.63 $ 0.68

Net income per common share:

Basic

$ 0.60 $ 0.47 $ 0.78 $ 0.99

Diluted

$ 0.49 $ 0.38 $ 0.63 $ 0.80

Weighted average common share—basic

186,573 185,367 186,205 185,044

Weighted average common share—diluted

229,646 230,452 230,399 231,266

The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teradyne’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of the condensed

consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Net income

$ 111,387 $ 87,252 $ 144,951 $ 184,096

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Foreign currency translation reclassification adjustment included in net income

2,266

Unrealized gains on marketable securities:

Unrealized gains on marketable securities arising during period

452 1,421 1,196 1,620

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

(24 ) (126 ) (490 ) (310 )

428 1,295 706 1,310

Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:

Amortization of prior service (benefit) cost included in net periodic pension and post-retirement costs

(92 ) 5 (183 ) 11

Other comprehensive income

336 1,300 523 3,587

Comprehensive income

$ 111,723 $ 88,552 $ 145,474 $ 187,683

The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teradyne’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of the condensed

consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$ 144,951 $ 184,096

Less: Income from discontinued operations

1,703

Less: Gain on disposal of discontinued operations

24,371

Income from continuing operations

144,951 158,022

Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation

25,578 25,645

Amortization

43,744 20,816

Stock-based compensation

21,396 14,682

Deferred taxes

15,937

Provision for excess and obsolete inventory

10,927 6,343

Non cash charge for the sale of inventories revalued at the date of acquisition

6,089

Contingent consideration adjustment

(8,406 )

Tax benefit related to stock options and restricted stock units

(7,600 ) (3,717 )

Retirement plans actuarial losses

3,054 4,203

Other

(438 ) 1,684

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses sold:

Accounts receivable

(216,794 ) (39,067 )

Inventories

21,446 (15,006 )

Other assets

5,027 (10,344 )

Deferred revenue and customer advances

(6,198 ) (28,339 )

Accounts payable and other accrued expenses

27,140 (9,275 )

Retirement plans contributions

(2,550 ) (5,245 )

Accrued income taxes

29,958 5,406

Net cash provided by continuing operations

113,261 125,808

Net cash used for discontinued operations

(4,225 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

113,261 121,583

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(57,804 ) (44,467 )

Purchases of available-for-sale marketable securities

(156,771 ) (498,541 )

Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale marketable securities

59,405 366,144

Proceed from sales of available-for-sale marketable securities

39,715 54,333

Net cash used for continuing operations

(115,455 ) (122,531 )

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

39,062

Net cash used for investing activities

(115,455 ) (83,469 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Issuance of common stock under employee stock option and stock purchase plans

16,984 17,052

Tax benefit related to stock options and restricted stock units

7,600 3,717

Payments of long-term debt

(1,246 ) (1,222 )

Payments of contingent consideration

(5,824 )

Net cash provided by financing activities

17,514 19,547

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

15,320 57,661

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

573,736 397,737

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 589,056 $ 455,398

The accompanying notes, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teradyne’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, are an integral part of the condensed

consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

TERADYNE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

A. The Company

Teradyne, Inc. (“Teradyne”) is a leading global supplier of automatic test equipment. Teradyne’s automatic test equipment products and services include:

semiconductor test (“Semiconductor Test”) systems,

military/aerospace (“Mil/Aero”) test instrumentation and systems, storage test (“Storage Test”) systems, and circuit-board test and inspection (“Commercial Board Test”) systems (collectively these products represent “Systems Test Group”), and

wireless test (“Wireless Test”) systems.

B. Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Teradyne and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. These interim financial statements are unaudited and reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of such interim financial statements. Certain prior year’s amounts were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The December 31, 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in Teradyne’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 29, 2012, for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Preparation of Financial Statements and Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

C. Change in Accounting Principle

Effective January 1, 2012, Teradyne changed the method of recognizing actuarial gains and losses for its defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plan and calculating the expected return on plan assets for its defined benefit pension plans. Historically, Teradyne recognized net actuarial gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheets on an annual basis and amortized them into operating results over the average remaining years of service of the plan participants, to the extent such gains and losses were outside of a range (“corridor”). Teradyne has elected to immediately recognize net actuarial gains and losses and the change in the fair value of the plan assets in its operating results in the year in which they occur or upon any interim remeasurement of the plans. In addition, Teradyne used to calculate the expected return on plan assets using a calculated market-related value of plan assets. Teradyne has also elected to calculate the expected return on plan assets using the fair value of the plan assets.

Teradyne believes that this new method is preferable as it eliminates the delay in recognizing gains and losses in its operating results and it will improve the transparency by faster recognition of the effects of

5


Table of Contents

economic and interest rate trends on plan obligations and investments. These actuarial gains and losses are generally measured annually as of December 31 and, accordingly, will be recorded during the fourth quarter of each year or upon any interim remeasurement of the plans. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, all prior periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been adjusted to apply the new accounting method retrospectively. This accounting change did not impact the financial position of the reportable segments.

Had these changes not been made, net income for the three months and six months ended July 1, 2012 would have been $110.4 million and $140.3 million, respectively, compared to the $111.4 million and $145.0 million actually recorded. Diluted earnings per share would have been $0.48 and $0.61 compared to $0.49 and $0.63 for the three months and six months ended July 1, 2012, respectively.

The effects of the change in accounting principle on the condensed consolidated financial statements for 2011 are presented below. We have condensed the comparative financial statements for financial statement line items that were not affected by the change in accounting principle.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2011
Originally
Reported
Effect of
Accounting
Change
As Adjusted
(in thousands)

Assets:

Total assets

$ 2,188,639 $ $ 2,188,639

Liabilities:

Total liabilities

683,579 683,579

Shareholders’ Equity:

Common stock

22,948 22,948

Additional paid-in capital

1,293,130 1,293,130

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

(129,875 ) 134,621 4,746

Retained earnings

318,857 (134,621 ) 184,236

Total shareholders’ equity

1,505,060 1,505,060

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$ 2,188,639 $ $ 2,188,639

6


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three Months
Ended July 3, 2011
Originally
Reported
Effect of
Accounting
Change
As Adjusted
(in thousands,
except per share amounts)

Net revenues

$ 410,519 $ $ 410,519

Cost of revenues

195,433 408 195,841

Gross profit

215,086 (408 ) 214,678

Operating expenses:

Engineering and development

47,393 999 48,392

Selling and administrative

57,481 399 57,880

Acquired intangible asset amortization

7,291 7,291

Restructuring and other

1,279 1,279

Total operating expenses

113,444 1,398 114,842

Income from operations

101,642 (1,806 ) 99,836

Interest income

1,403 1,403

Interest expense and other, net

(5,316 ) (5,316 )

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

97,729 (1,806 ) 95,923

Provision for income taxes

7,839 7,839

Income from continuing operations

89,890 (1,806 ) 88,084

Loss on disposal of discontinued operations

(832 ) (832 )

Net income

$ 89,058 $ (1,806 ) $ 87,252

Net income per common share from continuing operations:

Basic

$ 0.48 $ $ 0.48

Diluted

$ 0.39 $ (0.01 ) $ 0.38

Net income per common share:

Basic

$ 0.48 $ (0.01 ) $ 0.47

Diluted

$ 0.39 $ (0.01 ) $ 0.38

Weighted average common share—basic

185,367 185,367

Weighted average common share—diluted

230,452 230,452

7


Table of Contents
For the Six Months
Ended July 3, 2011
Originally
Reported
Effect of
Accounting
Change
As Adjusted
(in thousands,
except per share amounts)

Net revenues

$ 787,680 $ $ 787,680

Cost of revenues

380,185 (75 ) 380,110

Gross profit

407,495 75 407,570

Operating expenses:

Engineering and development

95,370 166 95,536

Selling and administrative

115,710 (99 ) 115,611

Acquired intangible asset amortization

14,582 14,582

Restructuring and other

1,692 1,692

Total operating expenses

227,354 67 227,421

Income from operations

180,141 8 180,149

Interest income

2,690 2,690

Interest expense and other, net

(11,492 ) (11,492 )

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

171,339 8 171,347

Provision for income taxes

13,325 13,325

Income from continuing operations

158,014 8 158,022

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

1,278 158 1,436

Benefit from income taxes

(267 ) (267 )

Income from discontinued operations

1,545 158 1,703

Gain on disposal of discontinued operations (net of tax of $4,578)

24,371 24,371

Net income

$ 183,930 $ 166 $ 184,096

Net income per common share from continuing operations:

Basic

$ 0.85 $ $ 0.85

Diluted

$ 0.68 $ $ 0.68

Net income per common share:

Basic

$ 0.99 $ $ 0.99

Diluted

$ 0.80 $ $ 0.80

Weighted average common share—basic

185,044 185,044

Weighted average common share—diluted

231,266 231,266

8


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Three Months
Ended July 3, 2011
Originally
Reported
Effect of
Accounting
Change
As Adjusted
(in thousands)

Net income

$ 89,058 $ (1,806 ) $ 87,252

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Unrealized gains on marketable securities

1,295 1,295

Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:

Actuarial losses arising during period, net of tax of ($10), $10

(4,150 ) 4,150

Settlement gain, net of tax of $38, ($38)

217 (217 )

Less: Amortization included in net periodic pension and post-retirement costs:

Actuarial losses, net of tax of $8, ($8)

2,377 (2,377 )

Prior service costs, net of tax of $0

5 5

2,382 (2,377 ) 5

Other comprehensive income

(256 ) 1,556 1,300

Comprehensive income

$ 88,802 $ (250 ) $ 88,552

For the Six Months
Ended July 3, 2011
Originally
Reported
Effect of
Accounting
Change
As Adjusted
(in thousands)

Net income

$ 183,930 $ 166 $ 184,096

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Foreign currency translation reclassification adjustment included in net income

2,266 2,266

Unrealized gains on marketable securities

1,310 1,310

Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:

Actuarial losses arising during period, net of tax of ($5), $5

(4,201 ) 4,201

Settlement gain, net of tax of $73, ($73)

277 (277 )

Less: Amortization included in net periodic pension and post-retirement costs:

Actuarial losses, net of tax of $20, ($20)

4,455 (4,455 )

Prior service costs, net of tax of $0

11 11

4,466 (4,455 ) 11

Other comprehensive income

4,118 (531 ) 3,587

Comprehensive income

$ 188,048 $ (365 ) $ 187,683

9


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Six Months
Ended July 3, 2011
Originally
Reported
Effect of
Accounting
Change
As Adjusted
(in thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$ 183,930 $ 166 $ 184,096

Less: Income from discontinued operations

1,545 158 1,703

Less: Gain on disposal of discontinued operations

24,371 24,371

Income from continuing operations

158,014 8 158,022

Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation

25,645 25,645

Amortization

25,289 (4,473 ) 20,816

Stock-based compensation

14,682 14,682

Provision for excess and obsolete inventory

6,343 6,343

Tax benefit related to stock options and restricted stock units

(3,717 ) (3,717 )

Other

1,422 4,465 5,887

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses sold:

Accounts receivable

(39,067 ) (39,067 )

Inventories

(15,006 ) (15,006 )

Other assets

(10,344 ) (10,344 )

Deferred revenue and customer advances

(28,339 ) (28,339 )

Accounts payable and other accrued expenses

(9,275 ) (9,275 )

Retirement plan contributions

(5,245 ) (5,245 )

Accrued income taxes

5,406 5,406

Net cash provided by continuing operations

125,808 125,808

Net cash used for discontinued operations

(4,225 ) (4,225 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

121,583 121,583

Net cash used for investing activities

(83,469 ) (83,469 )

Net cash provided by financing activities

19,547 19,547

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

57,661 57,661

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

397,737 397,737

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$ 455,398 $ $ 455,398

D. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This ASU is intended to enhance the understanding of the effects of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial statements, including financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset or subject to a master netting arrangement. The scope of this ASU includes derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements, reverse sale and repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending arrangements. The provisions of this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

10


Table of Contents

E. Discontinued Operations

On March 21, 2011, Teradyne completed the sale of its Diagnostic Solutions business unit, which was included in the Systems Test Group segment, to SPX Corporation for $40.2 million in cash. Teradyne sold this business as its growth potential as a stand-alone business within Teradyne was significantly less than if it was part of a larger automotive supplier. The financial information for Diagnostic Solutions has been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented. Net revenues and income from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended July 3, 2011 were as follows:

For the Three  Months
Ended

July 3, 2011
For the Six  Months
Ended

July 3, 2011
(in thousands)

Net revenues

$ $ 9,086

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

$ $ 1,436

(Loss) Gain from disposal of discontinued operations before income taxes

(832 ) 28,949

Income tax provision

4,311

(Loss) Income from discontinued operations

$ (832 ) $ 26,074

F. Financial Instruments and Derivatives

Financial Instruments

Teradyne uses the market and income approach to value its financial instruments and there was no change in valuation techniques used by Teradyne during the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011. As defined in ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” , fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820-10 requires that assets and liabilities are carried at fair value and are classified in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets as of the reporting date.

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1, that are observable either directly or indirectly as of the reporting date. For example, a common approach for valuing fixed income securities is the use of matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used to value securities by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not supported by market data. Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available, which might include Teradyne’s own data.

Most of Teradyne’s fixed income securities are classified as Level 2, with the exception of U.S. Treasury securities and investments in equity and debt mutual funds, which are classified as Level 1, and contingent consideration, which is classified as Level 3. As of July 1, 2012, the majority of Level 2 securities were priced by pricing vendors. These pricing vendors utilize the most recent observable market information in pricing these securities or, if specific prices are not available, use other observable inputs like market transactions involving identical or comparable securities.

During the six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, there were no transfers in and out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3.

11


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth by fair value hierarchy Teradyne’s financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

July 1, 2012
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Cash

$ 214,948 $ $ $ 214,948

Cash equivalents

363,877 10,231 374,108

Available for sale securities:

U.S. government agency securities

112,315 112,315

Corporate debt securities

48,891 48,891

Commercial paper

30,990 30,990

U.S. Treasury securities

28,673 28,673

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

9,500 9,500

Equity and debt mutual funds

9,058 9,058

Non-U.S. government securities

270 270

Total

$ 616,826 $ 211,927 $ $ 828,753

Liabilities

Contingent consideration

$ $ $ 54,662 $ 54,662

Derivatives

81 81

Total

$ $ 81 $ 54,662 $ 54,743

Reported as follows:

(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 578,825 $ 10,231 $ $ 589,056

Marketable securities

5,431 100,516 105,947

Long-term marketable securities

32,570 101,180 133,750

$ 616,826 $ 211,927 $ $ 828,753

Liabilities

Contingent consideration

$ $ $ 54,662 $ 54,662

Other accrued liabilities

81 81

$ $ 81 $ 54,662 $ 54,743

12


Table of Contents
December 31, 2011
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Cash

$ 161,243 $ $ $ 161,243

Cash equivalents

396,329 16,164 412,493

Available for sale securities:

U.S. government agency securities

83,197 83,197

Corporate debt securities

44,829 44,829

Commercial paper

22,075 22,075

U.S. Treasury securities

14,180 14,180

Equity and debt mutual funds

8,237 8,237

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

8,117 8,117

Non-U.S. government securities

274 274

Total

$ 580,263 $ 174,382 $ $ 754,645

Liabilities

Contingent consideration

$ $ $ 68,892 $ 68,892

Derivatives

314 314

Total

$ $ 314 $ 68,892 $ 69,206

Reported as follows:

(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
(in thousands)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 557,572 $ 16,164 $ $ 573,736

Marketable securities

9,044 87,458 96,502

Long-term marketable securities

13,647 70,760 84,407

$ 580,263 $ 174,382 $ $ 754,645

Liabilities

Contingent consideration

$ $ $ 68,892 $ 68,892

Other accrued liabilities

314 314

$ $ 314 $ 68,892 $ 69,206

Contingent consideration is measured at fair value and is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The valuation of contingent consideration uses assumptions and estimates to forecast a range of outcomes. Teradyne assesses these assumptions and estimates on a quarterly basis as additional data impacting the assumptions is obtained. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration related to updated assumptions and estimates are recognized within the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

13


Table of Contents

The following table provides quantitative information associated with the fair value measurement of Teradyne’s Level 3 financial instrument:

July 1, 2012 Weighted
Average

Liability

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs

(in thousands)
Contingent consideration $54,662 Income approach— discounted cash flow Revenue earn-out—probability of low case (scenario) for calendar year 2012 revenue. 70 %
Revenue earn-out—probability of high case (scenario) for calendar year 2012 revenue. 30 %
Discount rate for revenue earn-out 3.5 %
Discount rate for new product earn-out 3.5 %

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of contingent consideration are the probabilities of successful achievement of calendar year 2012 revenues, the quarterly period in which the revenues are expected to be achieved and a discount rate. Increases or decreases in the revenue probabilities and the period in which revenues will be achieved would result in a higher or lower fair value measurement.

The following table represents changes in the fair value of Level 3 contingent consideration:

Contingent consideration
(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2011

$ 68,892

Fair value adjustment

(1,858 )

Payment

(5,824 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

61,210

Fair value adjustment

(6,548 )

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ 54,662

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale marketable securities were $39.7 million and $54.3 million, respectively, for the six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011.

During the three and six months ended July 1, 2012, Teradyne recorded a net gain of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, from sales of marketable securities. During the three and six months ended July 3, 2011, Teradyne recorded a net gain of $0.1 million and a net loss $0.1 million, respectively, from sales of marketable securities.

Realized losses from sales of marketable securities are included in interest expense and other. Realized gains from sales of marketable securities are included in interest income.

The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments at July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:

July 1, 2012 December 31, 2011
Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
(in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 589,056 $ 589,056 $ 573,736 $ 573,736

Marketable securities

239,697 239,697 180,909 180,909

Convertible debt(1)

162,762 496,138 156,098 485,925

Japan loan

5,043 5,043 6,431 6,431

(1) The carrying value represents the bifurcated debt component only, while the fair value is based on quoted market prices for the convertible note which includes the equity conversion feature.

14


Table of Contents

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net and accounts payable approximate the carrying amount due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

At July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011, available-for-sale marketable securities were reported as follows:

July 1, 2012
Available-for-Sale Fair Market
Value of
Investments
with  Unrealized
Losses
Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
(in thousands)

U.S. government agency securities

$ 112,162 $ 168 $ (15 ) $ 112,315 $ 49,867

Corporate debt securities

46,890 2,071 (70 ) 48,891 18,236

Commercial paper

30,994 5 (9 ) 30,990 13,234

U.S. Treasury securities

28,564 109 28,673

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

9,501 (1 ) 9,500 5,822

Equity and debt mutual funds

8,345 726 (13 ) 9,058 332

Non-U.S. government securities

270 270

$ 236,726 $ 3,079 $ (108 ) $ 239,697 $ 87,491

Reported as follows:

Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
Fair Market
Value of
Investments
with Unrealized
Losses
(in thousands)

Marketable securities

$ 105,954 $ 12 $ (19 ) $ 105,947 $ 47,572

Long-term marketable securities

130,772 3,067 (89 ) 133,750 39,919

$ 236,726 $ 3,079 $ (108 ) $ 239,697 $ 87,491

December 31, 2011
Available-for-Sale Fair Market
Value of
Investments
with  Unrealized
Losses
Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
(in thousands)

U.S. government agency securities

$ 83,070 $ 152 $ (25 ) $ 83,197 $ 28,510

Corporate debt securities

43,077 1,893 (141 ) 44,829 17,033

Commercial paper

22,083 2 (10 ) 22,075 9,479

U.S. Treasury securities

14,141 39 14,180

Equity and debt mutual funds

7,876 477 (116 ) 8,237 3,749

Certificates of deposit and time deposits

8,122 (5 ) 8,117 5,800

Non-U.S. government securities

256 18 274

$ 178,625 $ 2,581 $ (297 ) $ 180,909 $ 64,571

15


Table of Contents

Reported as follows:

Cost Unrealized
Gain
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair Market
Value
Fair Market
Value of
Investments
with Unrealized
Losses
(in thousands)

Marketable securities

$ 96,518 $ 24 $ (40 ) $ 96,502 $ 35,595

Long-term marketable securities

82,107 2,557 (257 ) 84,407 28,976

$ 178,625 $ 2,581 $ (297 ) $ 180,909 $ 64,571

As of July 1, 2012, the fair market value of marketable securities with unrealized losses totaled $87.5 million. Of this value, $7.1 million had unrealized losses greater than one year and $80.4 million had unrealized losses less than one year. As of December 31, 2011, the fair market value of marketable securities with unrealized losses totaled $64.6 million. Of this value, $2.4 million had unrealized losses greater than one year and $62.2 million had unrealized losses less than one year.

The contractual maturities of available-for-sale marketable securities as of July 1, 2012 were as follows:

July 1, 2012
Cost Fair Market Value

Due within one year

$ 107,961 $ 107,954

Due after 1 year through 5 years

110,388 111,299

Due after 5 years through 10 years

2,662 2,836

Due after 10 years

15,715 17,608

Total

$ 236,726 $ 239,697

Derivatives

Teradyne conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with certain transactions denominated in local currencies. The purpose of Teradyne’s foreign currency management is to minimize the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated net monetary assets. Teradyne does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

To minimize the effect of exchange rate fluctuations associated with the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, Teradyne enters into foreign currency forward contracts. The change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded directly in earnings, and is used to offset the change in fair value of the monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

The notional amount of foreign exchange contracts hedging monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies was $74.4 million and $85.4 million at July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments at July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Balance Sheet Location July 1,
2012
December 31,
2011
(in thousands)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange contracts

Other accrued liabilities $ 81 $ 314

$ 81 $ 314

16


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments in the statement of operations recognized during the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011. The table does not reflect the corresponding gains (losses) from the remeasurement of the monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

Location of Gains (Losses)
Recognized in Statement
of Operations
For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange contracts

Interest expense and other $ (2,360 ) $ (166 ) $ 520 $ 661

$ (2,360 ) $ (166 ) $ 520 $ 661

See Note G “Debt” regarding derivatives related to convertible senior notes.

G. Debt

Loan Agreement

On March 31, 2009, Teradyne K.K., Teradyne’s wholly-owned subsidiary in Japan, entered into a loan agreement with a local bank in Japan to borrow approximately $10.0 million. The loan has a term of 5 years and a fixed interest rate of 0.81%. Approximately $6.0 million of the loan is collateralized by a real estate mortgage on Teradyne K.K.’s building and land in Kumamoto, Japan and approximately $4.0 million is unsecured. Teradyne, Inc. has guaranteed payment of the loan obligation. The loan is amortized over the term of the loan with semiannual principal payments of approximately $1.0 million payable on September 30 and March 30 each year. At July 1, 2012, approximately $2.5 million of the outstanding loan principal is included in current debt and approximately $2.5 million is classified as long-term debt.

Convertible Senior Notes

In April 2009, Teradyne issued 4.50% convertible senior notes (the “Notes”) at an aggregate principal amount of $190 million. The Notes will mature on March 15, 2014, unless earlier repurchased by Teradyne or converted. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of Teradyne’s existing and future senior debt and senior to any of Teradyne’s subordinated debt.

The Notes may be converted, under certain circumstances and during certain periods, at an initial conversion rate of approximately 182.65 shares of Teradyne’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $5.48, a 25% conversion premium based on the last reported sale price of $4.38 per share of Teradyne’s common stock on March 31, 2009. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances including but not limited to Teradyne issuing a cash or stock dividend or effecting a stock split.

During the three months ended July 1, 2012, the following circumstance that allows holders to convert their Notes at their option prior to December 15, 2013 occurred: the last reported sale price of Teradyne’s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeded 130% of the conversion price in effect on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter. As of August 10, 2012, no holders have exercised their option to convert their Notes.

Concurrently with the offering of the Notes, Teradyne entered into a convertible note hedge transaction with a strike price equal to the initial conversion price of the Notes, or approximately $5.48. The convertible note hedge allows Teradyne to receive shares of its common stock and/or cash related to the excess conversion value

17


Table of Contents

that it would pay to the holders of the Notes upon conversion. The convertible note hedges will cover, subject to customary antidilution adjustments, approximately 34,703,196 shares of Teradyne’s common stock. Teradyne paid approximately $64.6 million for the convertible note hedges.

On March 31, 2009, Teradyne entered into a warrant transaction with a strike price of approximately $7.67 per share, which was 75% higher than the closing price of Teradyne’s common stock. Teradyne received approximately $43.0 million for the warrants.

The convertible note hedge and warrant transaction will generally have the effect of increasing the conversion price of the Notes to approximately $7.67 per share of Teradyne’s common stock, representing a 75% conversion premium based upon the closing price of Teradyne’s common stock on March 31, 2009.

The Notes are classified as long-term debt in the balance sheet at July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The tables below represent the components of Teradyne’s convertible senior notes:

July 1,
2012
December 31,
2011
(in thousands)

Debt principal

$ 190,000 $ 190,000

Unamortized debt discount

27,238 33,902

Net carrying amount of the convertible debt

$ 162,762 $ 156,098

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Contractual interest expense

$ 2,138 $ 2,138 $ 4,299 $ 4,347

Amortization of the discount component and debt issue fees

3,592 3,160 7,071 6,221

Total interest expense on the convertible debt

$ 5,730 $ 5,298 $ 11,370 $ 10,568

As of July 1, 2012, the unamortized discount was $27.2 million, which will be amortized over approximately 1.75 years, and the carrying amount of the equity component was $63.4 million. As of July 1, 2012, the conversion rate was equal to the initial conversion price of approximately $5.48 per share and the if-converted value of the Notes was $487.9 million.

H. Deferred Revenue and Customer Advances

Deferred revenue and customer advances consist of the following and are included in short and long-term deferred revenue and customer advances.

July 1,
2012
December 31,
2011
(in thousands)

Customer advances

$ 54,149 $ 70,001

Maintenance, training and extended warranty

45,826 33,953

Undelivered elements

5,314 7,939

Acceptance

724 318

Total deferred revenue and customer advances

$ 106,013 $ 112,211

18


Table of Contents

I. Product Warranty

Teradyne generally provides a one-year warranty on its products commencing upon installation or shipment. A provision is recorded upon revenue recognition to cost of revenues for estimated warranty expense based on historical experience. Related costs are charged to the warranty accrual as incurred. The balance below is included in other accrued liabilities.

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period

$ 8,722 $ 9,502 $ 8,154 $ 9,886

Accruals for warranties issued during the period

5,649 3,976 9,425 7,553

Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties

403 (1,116 ) 143 (2,072 )

Settlements made during the period

(3,727 ) (3,100 ) (6,675 ) (6,105 )

Balance at end of period

$ 11,047 $ 9,262 $ 11,047 $ 9,262

When Teradyne receives revenue for extended warranties beyond one year, it is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period. Related costs are expensed as incurred. The balance below is included in deferred revenue and customer advances and long-term other accrued liabilities.

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period

$ 12,927 $ 9,870 $ 12,742 $ 8,972

Deferral of new extended warranty revenue

9,935 1,861 12,282 3,798

Recognition of extended warranty deferred revenue

(2,108 ) (1,423 ) (4,270 ) (2,462 )

Balance at end of period

$ 20,754 $ 10,308 $ 20,754 $ 10,308

J. Stock-Based Compensation

Restricted stock unit awards granted to employees vest in equal installments over four years. A portion of restricted stock unit awards granted to executive officers is subject to service-based vesting and a portion of the awards is subject to performance-based vesting. The percentage level of performance satisfied for performance-based grants is assessed on or near the anniversary of the grant date and, in turn, that percentage level determines the number of performance-based restricted stock units available for vesting over the vesting period; portions of the performance-based grants not available for vesting are forfeited. Service-based stock options vest in equal installments over four years, and have a term of seven years from the date of grant.

During the six months ended July 1, 2012, Teradyne granted 1.6 million of restricted stock unit awards to employees at a weighted average grant date fair value of $16.83 and 0.2 million of service-based stock options to executive officers at a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.85.

During the six months ended July 3, 2011, Teradyne granted 1.7 million of restricted stock unit awards to employees at a weighted average grant date fair value of $16.20 and 0.1 million of service-based stock options to executive officers at a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.74.

19


Table of Contents

The fair value of stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011

Expected life (years)

3.50 4.00

Interest rate

0.4 % 1.5 %

Volatility-historical

56.0 % 52.1 %

Dividend yield

0.0 % 0.0 %

Teradyne determined the stock options’ expected life based upon historical exercise data for executive officers, the age of the executive officers and the terms of the stock option grant. Volatility was determined using historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life. The risk-free rate was determined using the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The weighted-average fair value of employee stock purchase rights granted in the first six months of 2012 and 2011 was $4.09 and $3.66, respectively. The fair value of the employees’ purchase rights was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011

Expected life (years)

0.5 0.5

Interest rate

0.06 % 0.19 %

Volatility-historical

52.6 % 41.5 %

Dividend yield

0.0 % 0.0 %

K. Intangible Assets

Amortizable intangible assets consist of the following and are included in intangible assets on the balance sheet:

July 1, 2012
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Weighted
Average
Useful Life
(in thousands)

Developed technology

$ 358,155 $ 117,363 $ 240,792 6.3 years

Customer relationships and service and software maintenance contracts

144,971 54,347 90,624 8.0 years

Trade names and trademarks

33,840 9,139 24,701 9.0 years

Customer backlog

1,000 1,000 0.4 years

Total intangible assets

$ 537,966 $ 181,849 $ 356,117 7.0 years

20


Table of Contents
December 31, 2011
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Weighted
Average
Useful Life
(in thousands)

Developed technology

$ 358,155 $ 91,391 $ 266,764 6.3 years

Customer relationships and service and software maintenance contracts

144,971 45,230 99,741 8.0 years

Trade names and trademarks

33,840 7,370 26,470 9.0 years

Customer backlog

1,000 1,000 0.4 years

Total intangible assets

$ 537,966 $ 144,991 $ 392,975 7.0 years

Aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was $18.4 million and $36.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and $7.3 million and $14.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended July 3, 2011. Estimated intangible asset amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

Year

Amortization Expense
(in thousands)

2012 (remainder)

$ 36,650

2013

72,459

2014

69,374

2015

52,351

2016

52,351

L. Net Income per Common Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Income from continuing operations

$ 111,387 $ 88,084 $ 144,951 $ 158,022

Income from discontinued operations

1,703

(Loss) Gain on disposal of discontinued operations

(832 ) 24,371

Net income for basic net income per share

$ 111,387 $ 87,252 $ 144,951 $ 184,096

Weighted average common shares-basic

186,573 185,367 186,205 185,044

Effect of dilutive potential common shares:

Incremental shares from assumed conversion of convertible notes(1)

22,301 22,711 22,651 23,036

Convertible note hedge warrant shares(2)

17,340 17,914 17,829 18,368

Restricted stock units

1,171 3,877 1,405 4,222

Stock options

2,160 469 2,247 508

Employee stock purchase rights

101 114 62 88

Dilutive potential common shares

43,073 45,085 44,194 46,222

Weighted average common shares-diluted

229,646 230,452 230,399 231,266

Net income per common share-basic

Continuing operations

$ 0.60 $ 0.48 $ 0.78 $ 0.85

Discontinued operations

(0.01 ) 0.14

$ 0.60 $ 0.47 $ 0.78 $ 0.99

Net income per common share-diluted

Continuing operations

$ 0.49 $ 0.38 $ 0.63 $ 0.68

Discontinued operations

0.12

$ 0.49 $ 0.38 $ 0.63 $ 0.80

21


Table of Contents

(1) Incremental shares from assumed conversion of the convertible notes for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 are calculated using the difference between the average Teradyne stock price for the period and the conversion price of $5.48, multiplied by the 34.7 million shares that would be issued upon conversion. The result of this calculation, representing the total intrinsic value of the convertible debt, is divided by the average Teradyne stock price for the period.
(2) Convertible note hedge warrant shares for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 are calculated using the difference between the average Teradyne stock price for the period and the warrant price of $7.67, multiplied by the 34.7 million shares that would be issued upon conversion. The result of this calculation, representing the total intrinsic value of the warrant, is divided by the average Teradyne stock price for the period.

The computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 excludes the effect of the potential exercise of stock options to purchase approximately 0.3 million shares, and the computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 excludes the effect of the potential exercise of restricted stock units of 0.1 million, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended July 3, 2011 excludes the effect of the potential exercise of stock options to purchase approximately 0.5 million and 1.0 million shares, respectively, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

With respect to the Teradyne’s convertible debt, Teradyne intends to settle its conversion spread (i.e., the intrinsic value of the embedded option feature contained in the convertible debt) in shares. Teradyne accounts for its conversion spread using the treasury stock method.

M. Restructuring and Other, Net

Other

During the three and six months ended July 1, 2012, due to a decrease in specified new product revenue through the December 31, 2012 earn-out period end date, Teradyne recorded a $6.5 million and $8.4 million, respectively, fair value adjustment to decrease the LitePoint acquisition contingent consideration. As of July 1, 2012, the estimated undiscounted range of outcomes for the contingent consideration is $56.0 million to $58.0 million. The decrease in the range from December 31, 2011 is due to the $5.8 million contingent consideration payment during the six months ended July 1, 2012 and the $8.4 million fair value decrease.

During the six months ended July 3, 2011, Teradyne recorded a $0.7 million charge related to a non-U.S. pension settlement.

22


Table of Contents

Restructuring

In response to a downturn in the industry in 2008 and 2009, Teradyne initiated restructuring activities across all segments to reduce costs, principally through headcount reductions and facility consolidations. The remaining accrual for lease payments on vacated facilities of $1.5 million is reflected in the other accrued liabilities account and the long-term other accrued liabilities account and is expected to be paid over the lease terms, the latest of which expires in 2013. Teradyne expects to pay approximately $0.9 million against the lease accruals over the next twelve months. Teradyne’s future lease commitments are net of expected sublease income of $0.3 million as of July 1, 2012. The table below represents activity related to these actions.

Severance
and
Benefits
Facility
Exit
Costs
Total
(in thousands)
Pre-2011 Activities

Balance at December 31, 2010

$ 712 $ 3,263 $ 3,975

Provision

117 117

Change in estimate

155 (485 ) (330 )

Cash payments

(984 ) (916 ) (1,900 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

1,862 1,862

Cash payments

(189 ) (189 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

1,673 1,673

Cash payments

(209 ) (209 )

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ $ 1,464 $ 1,464

2011 Activities

Q1 2011 Activity:

Provision

$ 572 $ $ 572

Cash payments

(476 ) (476 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

96 96

Cash payments

(96 ) (96 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

$ $ $

Q2 2011 Activity:

Provision

$ 344 $ $ 344

Cash payments

(115 ) (115 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

229 229

Cash payments

(229 ) (229 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

$ $ $

2012 Activities

Q2 2012 Activity:

Provision

$ 286 $ $ 286

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ 286 $ $ 286

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ 286 $ 1,464 $ 1,750

During the six months ended July 1, 2012, Teradyne recorded the following restructuring charges:

Q2 2012 Action:

$0.3 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 10 people in Semiconductor Test.

23


Table of Contents

During the six months ended July 3, 2011, Teradyne recorded the following restructuring charges:

Q2 2011 Action:

$0.3 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 2 people in Semiconductor Test.

Q1 2011 Action:

$0.6 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 5 people in Semiconductor Test.

Pre-2011 Actions:

$(0.5) million related to changes in the estimated exit costs related to the Westford, MA and Poway, CA facilities in Systems Test Group, and the North Reading, MA facility in Semiconductor Test and Systems Test Group.

N. Retirement Plans

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Teradyne has defined benefit pension plans covering a portion of domestic employees and employees of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Benefits under these plans are based on employees’ years of service and compensation. Teradyne’s funding policy is to make contributions to these plans in accordance with local laws and to the extent that such contributions are tax deductible. The assets of these plans consist primarily of fixed income and equity securities. In addition, Teradyne has an unfunded supplemental executive defined benefit plan in the United States to provide retirement benefits in excess of levels allowed by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), as well as unfunded foreign plans.

Components of net periodic pension cost for all plans were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Service cost

$ 643 $ 668 $ 1,357 $ 1,436

Interest cost

4,125 4,457 8,185 8,784

Expected return on plan assets

(4,082 ) (3,906 ) (8,164 ) (7,818 )

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost

58 155 116 310

Settlement

680 680

Actuarial loss

3,146 4,279 3,146 4,279

Total net periodic pension cost

$ 3,890 $ 6,333 $ 4,640 $ 7,671

In the six months ended July 1, 2012, Teradyne contributed $1.8 million to its defined benefit pension plans.

Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

In addition to receiving pension benefits, U.S. Teradyne employees who meet early retirement eligibility requirements as of their termination dates may participate in Teradyne’s Welfare Plan, which includes death, and medical and dental benefits up to age 65. Death benefits provide a fixed sum to retirees’ survivors and are available to all retirees. Substantially all of Teradyne’s current U.S. employees could become eligible for these benefits, and the existing benefit obligation relates primarily to those employees.

24


Table of Contents

Components of net periodic post-retirement cost were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Service cost

$ 15 $ 14 $ 34 $ 30

Interest cost

108 134 219 270

Amortization of unrecognized prior service benefit

(150 ) (150 ) (299 ) (299 )

Actuarial gain

(92 ) (76 ) (92 ) (76 )

Total net periodic post-retirement cost

$ (119 ) $ (78 ) $ (138 ) $ (75 )

O. Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Commitments

As of July 1, 2012, Teradyne had entered into purchase commitments for certain components and materials. The purchase commitments aggregate to approximately $281.4 million, of which $280.0 million is for less than one year.

Legal Claims

Teradyne is subject to various legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on Teradyne’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

P. Segment Information

Teradyne has three operating segments (Semiconductor Test, Systems Test Group and Wireless Test), which are its reportable segments. The Semiconductor Test segment includes operations related to the design, manufacturing and marketing of semiconductor test products and services. The Systems Test Group segment includes operations related to design, manufacturing and marketing of products and services for military/aerospace instrumentation test, storage test and circuit-board test. The Wireless Test segment includes operations related to design, manufacturing and marketing of wireless test products and services. Each operating segment has a segment manager who is directly accountable to and maintains regular contact with Teradyne’s chief operating decision maker (Teradyne’s chief executive officer) to discuss operating activities, financial results, forecasts, and plans for the segment.

25


Table of Contents

Teradyne evaluates performance based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is business segment income before income taxes. The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in Note B “Accounting Policies” in Teradyne’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Segment information is as follows:

Semiconductor
Test
Systems
Test Group
Wireless
Test
Corporate
and
Eliminations
Consolidated
(in thousands)

Three months ended July 1, 2012:

Net revenues

$ 365,058 $ 71,298 $ 111,928 $ $ 548,284

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(1)(2)

91,249 11,628 51,139 (2,024 ) 151,992

Three months ended July 3, 2011:

Net revenues

$ 343,096 $ 67,423 $ $ $ 410,519

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(1)(2)

90,973 8,823 (3,873 ) 95,923

Six months ended July 1, 2012:

Net revenues

$ 632,646 $ 169,050 $ 143,256 $ $ 944,952

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(1)(2)

126,247 33,606 38,827 (5,444 ) 193,236

Six months ended July 3, 2011:

Net revenues

$ 662,346 $ 125,334 $ $ $ 787,680

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(1)(2)

167,900 14,314 (10,867 ) 171,347

(1) Pension and post retirement actuarial gains and losses, interest income, and interest expense and other are included in Corporate and Eliminations.
(2) Included in the income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for each of the segments are charges and credits for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 that include restructuring and other, net, and provision for excess and obsolete inventory, as follows:

Included in the Semiconductor Test segment are charges for the following:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Cost of revenues—provision for excess and obsolete inventory

$ 5,957 $ 1,500 $ 6,169 $ 5,942

Restructuring and other, net

286 1,279 286 2,170

Total

$ 6,243 $ 2,779 $ 6,455 $ 8,112

26


Table of Contents

Included in the Systems Test Group segment are charges and credits for the following:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Cost of revenues—provision for excess and obsolete inventory

$ 1,753 $ 216 $ 2,642 $ 401

Restructuring and other, net

(246 )

Total

$ 1,753 $ 216 $ 2,642 $ 155

Included in the Wireless Test segment are charges for the following:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Cost of revenues—inventory step-up

$ 1,218 $ $ 6,089 $

Cost of revenues—provision for excess and obsolete inventory

1,643 2,116

Total

$ 2,861 $ $ 8,205 $

Included in Corporate and Eliminations are credits for the following:

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in thousands)

Restructuring and other, net

$ (6,548 ) $ $ (8,406 ) $ (232 )

Total

$ (6,548 ) $ $ (8,406 ) $ (232 )

Q. Stock Repurchase Program

In November 2010, Teradyne’s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $200 million. In the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, Teradyne did not repurchase any shares. Cumulatively, as of July 1, 2012, Teradyne has repurchased 2.6 million shares of common stock for $31.2 million at an average price of $11.84.

27


Table of Contents
Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q which are not historical facts, so called “forward looking statements,” are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Investors are cautioned that all forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Teradyne’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See also Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law.

Overview

We are a leading global supplier of automatic test equipment. We design, develop, manufacture, and sell automatic test systems and solutions used to test complex electronics in the consumer electronics, automotive, computing, telecommunications, wireless, and aerospace and defense industries. Our automatic test equipment products and services include:

semiconductor test (“Semiconductor Test”) systems,

military/aerospace (“Mil/Aero”) test instrumentation and systems, storage test (“Storage Test”) systems, and circuit-board test and inspection (“Commercial Board Test”) systems (collectively these products represent “Systems Test Group”), and

wireless test (“Wireless Test”) systems.

We have a broad customer base which includes integrated device manufacturers (“IDMs”), outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers (“OSATs”), wafer foundries, fabless companies that design, but contract with others for the manufacture of integrated circuits (“ICs”), developers of wireless devices and consumer electronics, manufacturers of circuit boards, automotive suppliers, wireless product manufacturers, storage device manufacturers, aerospace and military contractors as well as the United States Department of Defense.

The sales of our products and services are dependent, to a large degree, on customers who are subject to fluctuating and seasonal demand for their products. This market dynamic has had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on our business since our customers often delay or accelerate purchases in reaction to changes in their businesses and to demand fluctuations in the semiconductor and electronics industries.

We believe our acquisitions of Nextest, Eagle Test and LitePoint, and our entry into the high speed memory and storage test markets have enhanced our opportunities for growth. We will continue to invest in our businesses to expand further our addressable markets while tightly managing our costs.

We regularly face price competition in each of our businesses from competitors. We intend to respond to competitive pricing moves as necessary, which may adversely impact our gross margins. Longer term, we will continue to invest in engineering to lower the cost of test which should help mitigate the impacts from aggressive pricing actions.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We have identified the policies which are critical to understanding our business and our results of operations. Except as noted below, there have been no significant changes during the six months ended July 1, 2012 to the items disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

28


Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2012, we changed the method of recognizing actuarial gains and losses for our defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plan and calculating the expected return on plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans. Historically, we recognized net actuarial gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheets on an annual basis and amortized them into operating results over the average remaining years of service of the plan participants, to the extent such gains and losses were outside of a corridor. We have elected to immediately recognize net actuarial gains and losses and the change in the fair value of the plan assets in our operating results in the year in which they occur or upon any interim remeasurement of the plans. In addition, we used to calculate the expected return on plan assets using a calculated market-related value of plan assets. We have also elected to calculate the expected return on plan assets using the fair value of the plan assets.

We believe that this new method is preferable as it eliminates the delay in recognizing gains and losses in our operating results and it will improve the transparency by faster recognition of the effects of economic and interest rate trends on plan obligations and investments. These actuarial gains and losses are generally measured annually as of December 31 and, accordingly, will be recorded during the fourth quarter of each year or upon any interim remeasurement of the plans. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, all prior periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been adjusted to apply the new accounting method retrospectively. This accounting change did not impact the financial position of the reportable segments.

29


Table of Contents

SELECTED RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three Months
Ended
For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011

Percentage of total net revenues:

Net revenues:

Products

88 % 83 % 86 % 83 %

Services

12 17 14 17

Total net revenues

100 100 100 100

Cost of revenues:

Cost of products

38 39 40 40

Cost of services

6 9 7 8

Total cost of revenues

44 48 47 48

Gross profit

56 52 53 52

Operating expenses:

Engineering and development

12 12 13 12

Selling and administrative

13 14 15 15

Acquired intangible asset amortization

3 2 4 2

Restructuring and other, net

(1 ) (1 )

Total operating expenses

28 28 31 29

Income from operations

29 24 22 23

Interest income

Interest expense and other

(1 ) (1 ) (1 ) (1 )

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

28 23 20 22

Income tax provision

7 2 5 2

Income from continuing operations

20 21 15 20

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

Income tax benefit

Income from discontinued operations

(Loss) Gain on disposal of discontinued operations

3

Net income

20 % 21 % 15 % 23 %

Results of Operations

Second Quarter 2012 Compared to Second Quarter 2011

Book to Bill Ratio

Book to bill ratio is calculated as net bookings divided by net sales. Book to bill ratio by reportable segment was as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011

Semiconductor Test

1.0 0.8

Systems Test Group

0.6 1.1

Wireless Test

1.7

Total Company

1.1 0.8

30


Table of Contents

Revenues

Net revenues by reportable segments were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Semiconductor Test

$ 365.1 $ 343.1 $ 22.0

Systems Test Group

71.3 67.4 3.9

Wireless Test

111.9 111.9

$ 548.3 $ 410.5 $ 137.8

The increase of $22.0 million or 6% in Semiconductor Test revenue was due to an increase in System-on-a-Chip product revenue partially offset by a decrease in memory product revenue. The increase in Systems Test Group revenue of $3.9 million or 6% was primarily due to an increase in sales of Mil/Aero test instrumentation, systems and services. The acquisition of LitePoint, which is our Wireless Test segment, completed in October of 2011, added $111.9 million of revenue in the three months ended July 1, 2012.

Our revenues by region as a percentage of total net revenue were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011

Taiwan

23 % 12 %

China

18 11

United States

12 15

Korea

12 15

Philippines

8 11

Hong Kong

6

Malaysia

5 6

Singapore

5 6

Europe

4 8

Japan

4 7

Thailand

3 8

Rest of World

1

100 % 100 %

Gross Profit

Our gross profit was as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar/Point
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Gross Profit

$ 309.5 $ 214.7 $ 94.8

Percent of Total Revenue

56.4 % 52.3 % 4.1

Gross profit as a percent of revenue increased by 4.1 percentage points as a result of an increase of 5.0 points due to the addition of LitePoint, which had its highest quarterly revenue in its history, partially offset by a decrease of 1.5 points due to higher inventory provisions.

31


Table of Contents

We assess the carrying value of our inventory on a quarterly basis by estimating future demand and comparing that demand against on-hand and on-order inventory positions. Forecasted revenue information is obtained from the sales and marketing groups and incorporates factors such as backlog and future revenue demand. This quarterly process identifies obsolete and excess inventory. Obsolete inventory, which represents items for which there is no demand, is fully reserved. Excess inventory, which represents inventory items that are not expected to be consumed during the next four quarters, is written-down to estimated net realizable value.

During the three months ended July 1, 2012, we recorded an inventory provision of $9.4 million included in cost of revenues, due to the following factors:

A decline in demand versus previously forecasted demand levels for a prior generation Nextest Magnum resulted in an inventory provision of $3.2 million.

A $2.6 million inventory write-down as a result of product transition related to the Flex Test Platform in Semiconductor Test.

The remainder of the charge of $3.6 million primarily reflects downward revisions to previously forecasted demand levels, of which $1.8 million was related to Systems Test Group, $1.6 million was related to Wireless Test and $0.2 million was related to Semiconductor Test.

During the three months ended July 3, 2011, we recorded an inventory provision of $1.7 million included in cost of revenues, due to the downward revisions to previously forecasted demand levels. Of the $1.7 million of total excess and obsolete provisions recorded in the three months ended July 3, 2011, $1.5 million was related to Semiconductor Test and $0.2 million was related to Systems Test Group.

During the three months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, we scrapped $2.8 million and $2.2 million of inventory, respectively. During the three months ended July 3, 2011, we sold $0.8 million of previously written-down or written-off inventory. As of July 1, 2012, we had inventory related reserves for amounts which had been written-down or written-off totaling $128.2 million. We have no pre-determined timeline to scrap the remaining inventory.

Engineering and Development

Engineering and development expenses were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Engineering and Development

$ 66.5 $ 48.4 $ 18.1

Percent of Total Revenue

12.1 % 11.8 %

The increase of $18.1 million in engineering and development expenses is due primarily to additional costs of $9.6 million related to LitePoint which was acquired in October 2011 and increased spending on engineering projects.

32


Table of Contents

Selling and Administrative

Selling and administrative expenses were as follows:

For the Three Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Selling and Administrative

$ 73.4 $ 57.9 $ 15.5

Percent of Total Revenue

13.4 % 14.1 %

The increase of $15.5 million in selling and administrative expenses is due primarily to additional costs of $12.3 million related to LitePoint.

Restructuring and Other, Net

Other

During the three months ended July 1, 2012, due to a decrease in specified new product revenue through the December 31, 2012 earnout period end date, we recorded a $6.5 million fair value adjustment to decrease the LitePoint acquisition contingent consideration. As of July 1, 2012, the estimated undiscounted range of outcomes for the contingent consideration is $56.0 million to $58.0 million.

During the three months ended July 3, 2011, Teradyne recorded a $0.7 million charge related to a non-U.S. pension settlement.

Restructuring

In response to a downturn in the industry in 2008 and 2009, we initiated restructuring activities across all segments to reduce costs, principally through headcount reductions and facility consolidations. The remaining accrual for lease payments on vacated facilities of $1.5 million is reflected in the other accrued liabilities account and the long-term other accrued liabilities account and is expected to be paid over the lease terms, the latest of which expires in 2013. We expect to pay approximately $0.9 million against the lease accruals over the next twelve months. Our future lease commitments are net of expected sublease income of $0.3 million as of July 1, 2012. The table below represents activity related to these actions.

33


Table of Contents
Severance
and
Benefits
Facility
Exit
Costs
Total
(in thousands)
Pre-2011 Activities

Balance at December 31, 2010

$ 712 $ 3,263 $ 3,975

Provision

117 117

Change in estimate

155 (485 ) (330 )

Cash payments

(984 ) (916 ) (1,900 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

1,862 1,862

Cash payments

(189 ) (189 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

1,673 1,673

Cash payments

(209 ) (209 )

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ $ 1,464 $ 1,464

2011 Activities

Q1 2011 Activity:

Provision

$ 572 $ $ 572

Cash payments

(476 ) (476 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

96 96

Cash payments

(96 ) (96 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

$ $ $

Q2 2011 Activity:

Provision

$ 344 $ $ 344

Cash payments

(115 ) (115 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

229 229

Cash payments

(229 ) (229 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

$ $ $

2012 Activities

Q2 2012 Activity:

Provision

$ 286 $ $ 286

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ 286 $ $ 286

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ 286 $ 1,464 $ 1,750

During the three months ended July 1, 2012, we recorded the following restructuring charges:

Q2 2012 Action:

$0.3 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 10 people in Semiconductor Test.

34


Table of Contents

During the three months ended July 3, 2011, we recorded the following restructuring charges:

Q2 2011 Action:

$0.3 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 2 people in Semiconductor Test.

Q1 2011 Action:

$0.6 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 5 people in Semiconductor Test.

Pre-2011 Actions:

$(0.5) million related to changes in the estimated exit costs related to the Westford, MA and Poway, CA facilities in Systems Test Group, and the North Reading, MA facility in Semiconductor Test and Systems Test Group.

Interest and Other

Interest income decreased by $0.5 million, from the second quarter of 2011 to 2012, due to a decrease in marketable securities due to the LitePoint acquisition. Interest expense and other increased by $1.0 million from second quarter of 2011 to 2012, due primarily to an increase in interest expense related to our convertible note.

Income Taxes

For the three months ended July 1, 2012, we recorded a tax provision of $40.6 million from continuing operations, which consisted of foreign taxes and U.S. deferred tax provision. For the three months ended July 3, 2011, we recorded a tax provision of $7.8 million from continuing operations, which consisted primarily of foreign taxes.

On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets by jurisdiction and assess the need for a valuation allowance. At July 1, 2012, we believe that we will ultimately realize the deferred tax assets recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. However, should we believe that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets would not be realized, our tax provision would increase in the period in which we determined that the realizability was not likely. We consider the probability of future taxable income and our historical profitability, among other factors, in assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets.

Six Months of 2012 Compared to Six Months of 2011

Revenues

Net revenues by reportable segments were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Semiconductor Test

$ 632.6 $ 662.3 $ (29.7 )

Systems Test Group

169.1 125.4 43.7

Wireless Test

143.3 143.3

$ 945.0 $ 787.7 $ 157.3

35


Table of Contents

The decrease of $29.7 million or 4% in Semiconductor Test revenue was primarily due to a decrease in memory product revenue, partially offset by an increase in System-on-a-Chip product revenue. The increase in Systems Test Group revenue of $43.7 million or 35% was primarily due to an increase in sales of Storage Test systems. The acquisition of LitePoint, which is our Wireless Test segment, completed in October of 2011, added $143.3 million of revenue in the six months ended July 1, 2012.

Our revenues by region as a percentage of total net revenue were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011

Taiwan

19 % 13 %

China

15 9

Korea

13 13

United States

12 14

Philippines

7 12

Thailand

7 6

Japan

6 7

Malaysia

5 11

Europe

5 7

Singapore

5 6

Hong Kong

5

Rest of World

1 2

100 % 100 %

Gross Profit

Our gross profit was as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar/Point
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Gross Profit

$ 500.4 $ 407.6 $ 92.8

Percent of Total Revenue

53.0 % 51.7 % 1.3

Gross profit as a percent of revenue increased by 1.3 percentage points a result of an increase of 3.5 points related to the addition of LitePoint, which had its highest six month revenue in its history, partially offset by a decrease of 2.2 points due to System-on-a-Chip product mix and higher Storage Test system sales.

We assess the carrying value of our inventory on a quarterly basis by estimating future demand and comparing that demand against on-hand and on-order inventory positions. Forecasted revenue information is obtained from the sales and marketing groups and incorporates factors such as backlog and future revenue demand. This quarterly process identifies obsolete and excess inventory. Obsolete inventory, which represents items for which there is no demand, is fully reserved. Excess inventory, which represents inventory items that are not expected to be consumed during the next four quarters, is written-down to estimated net realizable value.

During the six months ended July 1, 2012, we recorded an inventory provision of $10.9 million included in cost of revenues, due to the following factors:

A decline in demand versus previously forecasted demand levels for a prior generation Nextest Magnum resulted in an inventory provision of $3.2 million.

36


Table of Contents

A $2.6 million inventory write-down as a result of product transition related to the Flex Test Platform in Semiconductor Test.

The remainder of the charge of $5.1 million primarily reflects downward revisions to previously forecasted demand levels, of which $2.6 million was related to Systems Test Group, $2.1 million was related to Wireless Test and $0.4 million was related to Semiconductor Test.

During the six months ended July 3, 2011, we recorded an inventory provision of $6.3 million included in cost of revenues, due to the downward revisions to previously forecasted demand levels. Of the $6.3 million of total excess and obsolete provisions recorded in the six months ended July 3, 2011, $5.9 million was related to Semiconductor Test and $0.4 million was related to Systems Test Group.

During the six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, we scrapped $6.9 million and $2.6 million of inventory, respectively. During the six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, we sold $1.3 million and $3.8 million, respectively, of previously written-down or written-off inventory. As of July 1, 2012, we had inventory related reserves for amounts which had been written-down or written-off totaling $128.2 million. We have no pre-determined timeline to scrap the remaining inventory.

Engineering and Development

Engineering and development expenses were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Engineering and Development

$ 126.7 $ 95.5 $ 31.2

Percent of Total Revenue

13.4 % 12.1 %

The increase of $31.2 million in engineering and development expenses is due primarily to additional costs of $18.2 million related to LitePoint which was acquired in October 2011 and increased spending on engineering projects.

Selling and Administrative

Selling and administrative expenses were as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
Dollar
Change
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Selling and Administrative

$ 141.1 $ 115.6 $ 25.5

Percent of Total Revenue

14.9 % 14.7 %

The increase of $25.5 million in selling and administrative expenses is due primarily to additional costs of $23.0 million related to LitePoint.

Restructuring and Other, Net

Other

During the six months ended July 1, 2012, due to a decrease in specified new product revenue through the December 31, 2012 earn-out period end date, we recorded an $8.4 million fair value adjustment to decrease the LitePoint acquisition contingent consideration. As of July 1, 2012, the estimated undiscounted range of outcomes

37


Table of Contents

for the contingent consideration is $56.0 million to $58.0 million. The decrease in the range from December 31, 2011 is due to the $5.8 million contingent consideration payment during the six months ended July 1, 2012 and the $8.4 million fair value decrease.

During the six months ended July 3, 2011, Teradyne recorded a $0.7 million charge related to a non-U.S. pension settlement.

Restructuring

In response to a downturn in the industry in 2008 and 2009, we initiated restructuring activities across all segments to reduce costs, principally through headcount reductions and facility consolidations. The remaining accrual for lease payments on vacated facilities of $1.5 million is reflected in the other accrued liabilities account and the long-term other accrued liabilities account and is expected to be paid over the lease terms, the latest of which expires in 2013. We expect to pay approximately $0.9 million against the lease accruals over the next twelve months. Our future lease commitments are net of expected sublease income of $0.3 million as of July 1, 2012. The table below represents activity related to these actions.

Severance
and
Benefits
Facility
Exit
Costs
Total
(in thousands)
Pre-2011 Activities

Balance at December 31, 2010

$ 712 $ 3,263 $ 3,975

Provision

117 117

Change in estimate

155 (485 ) (330 )

Cash payments

(984 ) (916 ) (1,900 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

1,862 1,862

Cash payments

(189 ) (189 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

1,673 1,673

Cash payments

(209 ) (209 )

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ $ 1,464 $ 1,464

2011 Activities

Q1 2011 Activity:

Provision

$ 572 $ $ 572

Cash payments

(476 ) (476 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

96 96

Cash payments

(96 ) (96 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

$ $ $

Q2 2011 Activity:

Provision

$ 344 $ $ 344

Cash payments

(115 ) (115 )

Balance at December 31, 2011

229 229

Cash payments

(229 ) (229 )

Balance at April 1, 2012

$ $ $

2012 Activities

Q2 2012 Activity:

Provision

$ 286 $ $ 286

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ 286 $ $ 286

Balance at July 1, 2012

$ 286 $ 1,464 $ 1,750

38


Table of Contents

During the six months ended July 1, 2012, we recorded the following restructuring charges:

Q2 2012 Action:

$0.3 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 10 people in Semiconductor Test.

During the six months ended July 3, 2011, we recorded the following restructuring charges:

Q2 2011 Action:

$0.3 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 2 people in Semiconductor Test.

Q1 2011 Action:

$0.6 million of severance charges related to headcount reductions of 5 people in Semiconductor Test.

Pre-2011 Actions:

$(0.5) million related to changes in the estimated exit costs related to the Westford, MA and Poway, CA facilities in Systems Test Group, and the North Reading, MA facility in Semiconductor Test and Systems Test Group.

Interest and Other

Interest income decreased by $0.9 million, from the first six months of 2011 to 2012, due to a decrease in marketable securities due to the LitePoint acquisition. Interest expense and other increased by $0.9 million for the first six months of 2011 to 2012, due primarily to an increase in interest expense related to our convertible note.

Income Taxes

For the six months ended July 1, 2012, we recorded a tax provision of $48.3 million, from continuing operations, which consisted of foreign taxes and U.S. deferred tax provision. For the six months ended July 3, 2011, we recorded a tax provision of $13.3 million from continuing operations, which consisted primarily of foreign taxes.

On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets by jurisdiction and assess the need for a valuation allowance. At July 1, 2012, we believe that we will ultimately realize the deferred tax assets recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. However, should we believe that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets would not be realized, our tax provision would increase in the period in which we determined that the realizability was not likely. We consider the probability of future taxable income and our historical profitability, among other factors, in assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets.

39


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of July 1, 2012:

Payments Due by Period
Total Less than
1 year
1-3 years 3-5 years More than
5 years
Other
(in thousands)

Long-Term Debt Obligations (1)

$ 195,043 $ 2,522 $ 192,521 $ $ $

Interest on Debt

17,235 8,635 8,600

Contingent Acquisition Payments

54,662 54,662

Operating Lease Obligations

52,221 13,998 19,574 10,117 8,532

Purchase Obligations

281,360 279,760 1,600

Retirement Plan Contributions

52,928 5,174 10,570 11,206 25,978

Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Balance Sheet under GAAP (2)

80,496 22,303 58,193

Total

$ 733,945 $ 364,751 $ 255,168 $ 21,323 $ 34,510 $ 58,193

(1) Long-Term Debt Obligations include current maturities.
(2) Included in Other Long-Term Liabilities are liabilities for customer advances, extended warranty, uncertain tax positions and other obligations. For certain long-term obligations, we are unable to provide a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of future payments relating to these obligations and therefore we included these amounts in the column marked “Other”.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance increased by $74.1 million in the six months ended July 1, 2012, to $828.8 million. Cash activity for the six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 was as follows:

For the Six Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
July 3,
2011
(in millions)

Cash provided by operating activities:

Income from continuing operations, adjusted for non-cash items

$ 255.2 $ 227.7

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses sold

(141.9 ) (101.9 )

Cash used for discontinued operations

(4.2 )

Total cash provided by operating activities

113.3 121.6

Cash used for investing activities from continuing operations

(115.5 ) (122.5 )

Cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations

39.1

Total cash used for investing activities

(115.5 ) (83.4 )

Total cash provided by financing activities

17.5 19.5

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

$ 15.3 $ 57.7

In the six months ended July 1, 2012, changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses sold, used cash of $141.9 million. This was due to a $190.3 million increase in operating assets, partially offset by a $48.4 million increase in operating liabilities.

The increase in operating assets was due to a $216.8 million increase in accounts receivable due to higher sales volume, partially offset by a $21.4 million decrease in inventories, and $5.0 million decrease in other assets

40


Table of Contents

mainly due to a decrease in prepayments. The increase in operating liabilities was due to a $47.5 million increase in accounts payable due to increased sales volume, a $30.0 million increase in accrued income taxes, and $1.1 million increase in other accrued liabilities, partially offset by $21.4 million decrease in accrued employee compensation due primarily to variable compensation payments, a $6.2 million decrease in customer advance payments and deferred revenue and $2.6 million of retirement plan contributions.

Investing activities during the six months ended July 1, 2012 used cash of $115.5 million, due to $156.8 million used for purchases of marketable securities and $57.8 million used for purchases of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities that provided cash of $39.7 million and $59.4 million, respectively.

Financing activities during the six months ended July 1, 2012 provided cash of $17.5 million, $16.9 million was from the issuance of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans, and $7.6 million from the tax benefit related to stock options and restricted stock units, partially offset by $5.8 million of cash used for a payments related to LitePoint acquisition contingent consideration and $1.2 million of cash used for a payment on long-term debt.

In the six months ended July 3, 2011, changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of businesses sold, used cash of $101.9 million. This was due to a $64.4 million increase in operating assets and a $37.5 million decrease in operating liabilities.

The increase in operating assets was due to a $39.1 million increase in accounts receivable and a $15.0 million increase in inventories due to higher sales volume, and a $10.3 million increase in prepayments and other assets. The decrease in operating liabilities was due to a $44.0 million decrease in accrued employee compensation due primarily to variable compensation payments, a $26.9 million decrease in customer advance payments due to shipments of systems prepaid by customers, $5.2 million of retirement plan contributions, and a $1.4 million decrease in deferred revenue, partially offset by a $25.9 million increase in accounts payable due to increased sales volume and an $8.7 million increase in other accrued liabilities, and a $5.4 million increase in accrued income taxes.

Investing activities during the six months ended July 3, 2011 used cash of $122.5 million, due to $498.5 million used for purchases of marketable securities and $44.5 million used for purchases of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities that provided cash of $54.3 million and $366.2 million, respectively.

Financing activities during the six months ended July 3, 2011 provided cash of $19.5 million, $17.0 million from the issuance of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans, and $3.7 million from the tax benefit related to stock options and restricted stock units, partially offset by $1.2 million of cash used for a payment on long-term debt.

We believe our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance will be sufficient to meet working capital and expenditure needs for at least the next twelve months. We do not have significant cash outside the U.S. that if repatriated would incur additional taxes. In addition, the amount of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in the U.S. and our operations in the U.S. provide sufficient liquidity to fund our business activities in the U.S. Inflation has not had a significant long-term impact on earnings.

Equity Compensation Plans

As discussed in Note N “Stock Based Compensation” in our 2011 Form 10-K, we have a 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and a 2006 Equity and Cash Compensation Incentive Plan (the “2006 Equity Plan”).

The purpose of the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is to encourage stock ownership by all eligible employees of Teradyne. The purpose of the 2006 Equity Plan is to provide equity ownership and compensation opportunities in Teradyne to our employees, officers, directors, consultants and/or advisors. Both plans were approved by our shareholders.

41


Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This ASU is intended to enhance the understanding of the effects of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial statements, including financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset or subject to a master netting arrangement. The scope of this ASU includes derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements, reverse sale and repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending arrangements. The provisions of this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

For “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” affecting Teradyne, see Item 7a. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2012. There were no material changes in our exposure to market risk from those set forth in our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such material information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

42


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A: Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K remain applicable to our business.

The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In November 2010, Teradyne’s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $200 million. Cumulatively, as of July 1, 2012, we have repurchased 2.6 million shares of common stock for $31.2 million at an average price of $11.84.

The following table includes information with respect to repurchases we made of our common stock during the three months ended July 1, 2012 (in thousands except per share price):

Period

(a) Total
Number of
Shares
(or Units)
Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid per
Share (or Unit)
(c) Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
(d) Maximum Number
(or Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that may Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

April 2, 2012 – April 29, 2012

$ $ 168,825

April 30, 2012 –May 27, 2012

$ $ 168,825

May 28, 2012 – July 1, 2012

$ $ 168,825

$ $ 168,825

We satisfy the minimum withholding tax obligation due upon the vesting and the conversion of restricted stock units into shares of our common stock, by automatically withholding from the shares being issued a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value on the date of such vesting and conversion that would satisfy the withholding amount due.

The following table includes information with respect to our common stock shares withheld to satisfy withholding tax obligations during the three months ended July 1, 2012 (in thousands except per share price):

Period

(a) Total
Number of
Shares
(or Units)
Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid per
Share (or Unit)
(c) Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
(d) Maximum Number
(or Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that may Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

April 2, 2012 – April 29, 2012

3 $ 16.99

April 30, 2012 –May 27, 2012

14 $ 15.21

May 28, 2012 – July 1, 2012

1 $ 13.61

18 $ 15.43

Item 4: Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

43


Table of Contents
Item 6: Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

Description

10.1 Executive Officer Agreement dated June 29, 2012 between Teradyne, Inc. and Jeffrey Hotchkiss (filed herewith)
10.2 Executive Officer Change in Control Agreement dated June 30, 2012 between Teradyne, Inc. and Walter Vahey (filed herewith)
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

44


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TERADYNE, INC.
Registrant

/ S /    G REGORY R. B EECHER

Gregory R. Beecher

Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Duly Authorized Officer
and Principal Financial Officer)

August 10, 2012

45

TABLE OF CONTENTS