TPH 10-Q Quarterly Report June 30, 2015 | Alphaminr
TRI Pointe Group, Inc.

TPH 10-Q Quarter ended June 30, 2015

TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 tph-10q_20150630.htm 10-Q tph-10q_20150630.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

or

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-35796

TRI Pointe Group, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware

61-1763235

(State or other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

19540 Jamboree Road, Suite 300

Irvine, California 92612

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (949) 438-1400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer

x

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ¨ No x

Registrant’s shares of common stock outstanding at August 1, 2015: 161,737,684


NOTE REGARDING THIS QUARTERLY REPORT

On July 7, 2015, TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Homes”), reorganized its corporate structure (the “Reorganization”) whereby TRI Pointe Homes became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Group”).  As a result of the reorganization, each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of TRI Pointe Homes (“Homes Common Stock”) was cancelled and converted automatically into the right to receive one validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of TRI Pointe Group (“Group Common Stock”), each share having the same designations, rights, powers and preferences, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof as the shares of Homes Common Stock being so converted.  TRI Pointe Group, as the successor issuer to TRI Pointe Homes (pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), began making filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act on July 7, 2015.

In connection with the Reorganization, TRI Pointe Group (i) became a co-issuer of TRI Pointe Homes' 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 and TRI Pointe Homes' 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024; and (ii) replaced TRI Pointe Homes as the borrower under TRI Pointe Homes' existing unsecured revolving credit facility.

The business, executive officers and directors of TRI Pointe Group, and the rights and limitations of the holders of Group Common Stock immediately following the Reorganization were identical to the business, executive officers and directors of TRI Pointe Homes, and the rights and limitations of holders of Homes Common Stock immediately prior to the Reorganization.

References to “TRI Pointe”, “ the Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including in the  consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto in this report) have the following meanings, unless the context otherwise requires:

·

For periods prior to July 7, 2015: TRI Pointe Homes and its subsidiaries

·

For periods from and after July 7, 2015: TRI Pointe Group and its subsidiaries


TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

June 30, 2015

Page
Number

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements for TRI Pointe Homes, Inc.

3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 (unaudited) and December 31, 2014

3

Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014)

4

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 (unaudited)

5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)

6

Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

7

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

30

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

48

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

48

Part II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

49

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

49

Item 6.

Exhibits

50

SIGNATURES

52

- 2 -


PART I. FINANCI AL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

TRI POINTE HOMES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share amounts)

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

(unaudited)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

121,907

$

170,629

Receivables

34,189

20,118

Real estate inventories

2,535,753

2,280,183

Investments in unconsolidated entities

17,325

16,805

Goodwill and other intangible assets, net

162,296

162,563

Deferred tax assets

148,367

157,821

Other assets

87,350

105,405

Total assets

$

3,107,187

$

2,913,524

Liabilities

Accounts payable

$

51,009

$

68,860

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

205,422

210,009

Unsecured revolving credit facility

399,392

260,000

Seller financed loans

12,390

14,677

Senior notes

888,267

887,502

Total liabilities

1,556,480

1,441,048

Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)

Equity

Stockholders' Equity:

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized;

no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014,

respectively

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 161,737,684 and

161,355,490 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and

December 31, 2014, respectively

1,617

1,614

Additional paid-in capital

910,520

906,159

Retained earnings

616,634

546,407

Total stockholders' equity

1,528,771

1,454,180

Noncontrolling interests

21,936

18,296

Total equity

1,550,707

1,472,476

Total liabilities and equity

$

3,107,187

$

2,913,524

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 3 -


TRI POINTE HOMES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Revenues:

Home sales

$

427,238

$

309,609

$

801,503

$

551,511

Land and lot sales

67,490

27,512

69,490

30,899

Other operations

789

5,442

1,782

8,285

495,517

342,563

872,775

590,695

Expenses:

Cost of home sales

341,742

242,709

641,648

433,977

Cost of land and lot sales

11,564

24,765

13,873

27,928

Other operations

592

567

1,154

2,199

Sales and marketing

25,634

23,798

48,920

44,703

General and administrative

28,299

18,184

56,478

36,189

Restructuring charges

498

520

720

2,178

Total expenses

408,329

310,543

762,793

547,174

Income from operations

87,188

32,020

109,982

43,521

Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities

(155

)

(69

)

(81

)

(137

)

Transaction expenses

(448

)

(506

)

Other income (loss), net

(31

)

(1,476

)

225

(741

)

Income before taxes

87,002

30,027

110,126

42,137

Provision for income taxes

(30,240

)

(5,802

)

(38,067

)

(10,331

)

Net income

56,762

24,225

72,059

31,806

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

(1,832

)

(1,832

)

Net income available to common stockholders

$

54,930

$

24,225

$

70,227

$

31,806

Earnings per share

Basic

$

0.34

$

0.19

$

0.43

$

0.25

Diluted

$

0.34

$

0.19

$

0.43

$

0.25

Weighted average shares outstanding

Basic

161,686,570

129,700,000

161,589,310

129,700,000

Diluted

162,308,099

129,700,000

162,265,155

129,700,000

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 4 -


TRI POINTE HOMES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share amounts)

Number of

Additional

Total

Common

Common

Paid-in

Retained

Stockholders'

Noncontrolling

Total

Shares (Note 1)

Stock

Capital

Earnings

Equity

Interests

Equity

Balance at December 31, 2013

129,700,000

$

1,297

$

333,589

$

462,210

$

797,096

$

28,421

$

825,517

Net income

84,197

84,197

84,197

Capital contribution by Weyerhaeuser, net

63,355

63,355

63,355

Common shares issued in connection

with the Merger (Note 2)

31,632,533

317

498,656

498,973

498,973

Shares issued under share-based awards

22,957

176

176

176

Excess tax benefit of share-based awards, net

1,757

1,757

1,757

Stock-based compensation expense

8,626

8,626

8,626

Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net

(17,248

)

(17,248

)

Net effect of consolidations, de-

consolidations and other transactions

7,123

7,123

Balance at December 31, 2014

161,355,490

1,614

906,159

546,407

1,454,180

18,296

1,472,476

Net income

70,227

70,227

1,832

72,059

Shares issued under share-based awards

382,194

3

657

660

660

Excess tax benefit of share-based awards, net

352

352

352

Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of

employees for restricted stock units

(2,190

)

(2,190

)

(2,190

)

Stock-based compensation expense

5,542

5,542

5,542

Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net

(2,121

)

(2,121

)

Net effect of consolidations, de-

consolidations and other transactions

3,929

3,929

Balance at June 30, 2015

161,737,684

$

1,617

$

910,520

$

616,634

$

1,528,771

$

21,936

$

1,550,707

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 5 -


TRI POINTE HOMES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income

$

72,059

$

31,806

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)

provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

3,171

6,230

Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities, net

81

137

Deferred income taxes, net

9,454

120,822

Amortization of stock-based compensation

5,542

2,703

Charges for impairments and lot option abandonments

1,538

572

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Real estate inventories

(255,416

)

(88,352

)

Receivables

(14,071

)

23,578

Other assets

23,483

7,347

Accounts payable

(17,851

)

34,570

Pension and other postretirement benefits

1,624

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

(5,085

)

(34,888

)

Other operating cash flows

(1,574

)

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

(177,095

)

104,575

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment

(613

)

(4,256

)

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

7

Investments in unconsolidated entities

(1,257

)

236

Net cash used in investing activities

(1,870

)

(4,013

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Borrowings from debt

140,000

Repayment of debt

(2,895

)

(25,508

)

Debt issuance costs

(2,688

)

Proceeds from issuance of senior notes

886,698

Change in book overdrafts

(5,534

)

Distributions to Weyerhaeuser

(8,606

)

Net repayments of debt held by variable interest entities

(875

)

3,145

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

2,034

1,385

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(4,155

)

(9,334

)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based awards

660

Excess tax benefits of share-based awards

352

1,572

Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units

(2,190

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

130,243

843,818

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(48,722

)

944,380

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period

170,629

4,510

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period

$

121,907

$

948,890

See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 6 -


TRI POINTE HOMES, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1.

Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

The Company is engaged in the design, construction and sale of innovative single-family homes through its portfolio of six quality brands across eight states, including Maracay Homes in Arizona, Pardee Homes in California and Nevada, Quadrant Homes in Washington, Trendmaker Homes in Texas, TRI Pointe Homes in California and Colorado and Winchester Homes in Maryland and Virginia.

On July 7, 2015, TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“TRI Pointe Homes”) reorganized its corporate structure (the “Reorganization”) whereby TRI Pointe Homes became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Group”).  See “Note Regarding This Quarterly Report” for information concerning the reorganization effected on July 7, 2015.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries as described in “Reverse Acquisition” below, as well as other entities in which the Company has a controlling interest and variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary.  The noncontrolling interests as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 represent the outside owners’ interests in the Company’s consolidated entities and the net equity of the VIE owners.  All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated upon consolidation.  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.  Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation with respect to interim financial statements, have been included.

The Company has historically experienced, and expects to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. The results of operations for the three or six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Because the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are condensed, they should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Reverse Acquisition

On July 7, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), TRI Pointe consummated the previously announced merger (the “Merger”) of our wholly owned subsidiary, Topaz Acquisition, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), with and into Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (“WRECO”), with WRECO surviving the Merger and becoming our wholly owned subsidiary, as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013 (the “Transaction Agreement”), by and among us, Weyerhaeuser Company (“Weyerhaeuser”), WRECO and Merger Sub. The Merger is accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). For accounting purposes, the Merger is treated as a “reverse acquisition” and WRECO is considered the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, WRECO is reflected as the predecessor and acquirer and therefore the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of WRECO for all periods presented and do not include the historical financial statements of TRI Pointe prior to the Closing Date. Subsequent to the Closing Date, the consolidated financial statements reflect the results of the combined company.

- 7 -


See Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, for further information on the Me rger. In the Merger, each issued and outstanding WRECO common share was converted into 1.297 shares of TRI Pointe common stock. The historical issued and outstanding WRECO common shares (100,000,000 common shares for all periods presented prior to the Merg er) have been recast (as 129,700,000 common shares of the Company for all periods prior to the Merger) in all periods presented to reflect this conversion.

Use of Estimates

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In April 2014, the FASB issued amendments to Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The update requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and add new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. We adopted ASU 2014-08 on January 1, 2015 and the adoption had no impact on our current or prior year financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: identify the contract(s) with a customer; identify the performance obligations in the contract; determine the transaction price; allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue-recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition , most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the accounting standards codification, and some cost guidance related to construction-type and production-type contracts. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year and is now effective for public entities for the annual periods ending after December 15, 2017, and for annual and interim periods thereafter.  Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. We are currently evaluating the approach for implementation and the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (“ASU 2014-15”), Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern , which requires management to evaluate, in connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable) and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. We believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02, (“ASU 2015-02”), Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We believe the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, (“ASU 2015-03”), Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company plans to early adopt this guidance at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015.  Had the Company early adopted ASU 2015-03, the impact for the period ended June 30, 2015 on our consolidated balance sheet would have been a balance sheet reclassification of deferred loan costs currently included in Other Assets resulting in a decrease to Other Assets of $24.7 million, a decrease to Senior Notes of $22.1 million and a decrease to unsecured revolving credit facility of $2.6 million. The impact for the period ended December 31, 2014, would have been a decrease to Other Assets of $23.7 million and a decrease to Senior Notes of $23.7 million.

- 8 -


Reclassifications

Certain amounts in our consolidated financial statements for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

2.

Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company

In the Merger, TRI Pointe issued 129,700,000 shares of TRI Pointe common stock to the former holders of WRECO common shares, together with cash in lieu of any fractional shares. On the Closing Date, WRECO became a wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe. Immediately following the consummation of the Merger, the ownership of TRI Pointe common stock on a fully diluted basis was as follows: (i) the WRECO common shares held by former Weyerhaeuser shareholders were converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 79.6% of the then outstanding TRI Pointe common stock, (ii) the TRI Pointe common stock outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger represented 19.4% of the then outstanding TRI Pointe common stock, and (iii) the outstanding equity awards of WRECO and TRI Pointe employees represented the remaining 1.0% of the then outstanding TRI Pointe common stock. On the Closing Date, the former direct parent entity of WRECO paid TRI Pointe $31.5 million in cash in accordance with the Transaction Agreement.  Following the Merger, WRECO changed its name to TRI Pointe Holdings, Inc.

Assumption of Senior Notes

On the Closing Date, TRI Pointe assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”) and $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes” and together with the 2019 Notes, the “Senior Notes”). Additionally, WRECO and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”) entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which they guaranteed TRI Pointe’s obligations with respect to the Senior Notes. The Guarantors also entered into a joinder agreement to the Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2014, among WRECO, TRI Pointe, and the initial purchasers of the Senior Notes (collectively, the “Initial Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Guarantors became parties to the Purchase Agreement. Additionally, TRI Pointe and the Guarantors entered into joinder agreements to the Registration Rights Agreements, dated as of June 13, 2014, among WRECO and the Initial Purchasers with respect to the Senior Notes, pursuant to which TRI Pointe and the Guarantors were joined as parties to the Registration Rights Agreements.

The net proceeds of $861.3 million from the offering of the Senior Notes were deposited into two separate escrow accounts following the closing of the offering on June 13, 2014. Upon release of the escrowed funds on the Closing Date and prior to the consummation of the Merger, WRECO paid $743.7 million in cash to its former direct parent, which cash was retained by Weyerhaeuser and its subsidiaries (other than WRECO and its subsidiaries). The payment consisted of the $739.0 million Payment Amount (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) as well as $4.7 million in payment of all unpaid interest on the debt payable to Weyerhaeuser that accrued from November 3, 2013 to the Closing Date. The remaining $117.6 million of proceeds was retained by TRI Pointe.

- 9 -


Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

The following table summarizes the calculation of the fair value of the total consideration transferred and the provisional amounts recognized as of the Closing Date (in thousands, except shares and closing stock price):

Calculation of consideration transferred

TRI Pointe shares outstanding

31,632,533

TRI Pointe closing stock price on July 7, 2014

$

15.85

Consideration attributable to common stock

$

501,376

Consideration attributable to TRI Pointe share-based
equity awards

1,072

Total consideration transferred

$

502,448

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed

Cash and cash equivalents

$

53,800

Accounts receivable

654

Real estate inventories

539,677

Intangible asset

17,300

Goodwill

139,304

Other assets

28,060

Total assets acquired

778,795

Accounts payable

26,105

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

23,114

Notes payable and other borrowings

227,128

Total liabilities assumed

276,347

Total net assets acquired

$

502,448

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets, accounts payable, accrued payroll liabilities, and accrued expenses and other liabilities were generally stated at historical carrying values given the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. Notes payable and other borrowings are stated at carrying value due to the limited amount of time since the notes payable and other borrowings were entered into prior to the Closing Date.

The Company determined the fair value of real estate inventories on a community-by-community basis primarily using a combination of market-comparable land transactions, land residual analysis and discounted cash flow models. The estimated fair value is significantly impacted by estimates related to expected average selling prices, sales pace, cancellation rates and construction and overhead costs. Such estimates must be made for each individual community and may vary significantly between communities.

The fair value of the acquired intangible asset was determined based on a valuation performed by an independent valuation specialist. The $17.3 million intangible asset is related to the TRI Pointe Homes trade name which is deemed to have an indefinite useful life.

Goodwill is primarily attributed to expected synergies from combining WRECO’s and TRI Pointe’s existing businesses, including, but not limited to, expected cost synergies from overhead savings resulting from streamlining certain redundant corporate functions, improved operating efficiencies, including provision of certain corporate level administrative and support functions at a lower cost than was historically allocated to WRECO for such services by its former direct parent, and growth of ancillary operations in various markets as permitted under applicable law, including a mortgage business, a title company and other ancillary operations. The Company also anticipates opportunities for growth through expanded geographic and customer segment diversity and the ability to leverage additional brands.  The acquired goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.

The Company completed its business combination accounting during the first quarter of 2015.

- 10 -


Supplemental Pro Forma Information (Unaudited)

The following represents unaudited pro forma operating results as if the acquisition had been completed as of January 1, 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Three Months Ended

June 30, 2014

Six Months Ended

June 30, 2014

Total revenues

$

429,899

$

750,843

Net income

$

32,200

$

44,514

Earnings per share – basic

$

0.20

$

0.28

Earnings per share – diluted

$

0.20

$

0.27

The unaudited pro forma operating results have been determined after adjusting the operating results of TRI Pointe to reflect the purchase accounting and other acquisition adjustments including interest expense associated with the debt used to fund a portion of the Merger. The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect any cost savings, operating synergies or other enhancements that we may achieve as a result of the Merger or the costs necessary to integrate the operations to achieve these cost savings and synergies. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma amounts are for comparative purposes only and may not necessarily reflect the results of operations had the Merger been completed at the beginning of the period or be indicative of the results we will achieve in the future.

3.

Restructuring

In connection with the Merger, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to reduce duplicate corporate and divisional overhead costs and expenses. In addition, WRECO previously recognized restructuring expenses related to general cost reduction initiatives. Restructuring costs were comprised of the following (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Employee-related costs

$

23

$

60

$

135

$

1,307

Lease termination costs

475

460

585

871

Total

$

498

$

520

$

720

$

2,178

Lease termination costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, and 2014, respectively, relate to contract terminations as a result of general cost reduction initiatives.

Changes in employee-related restructuring reserves were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Accrued employee-related costs, beginning of period

$

533

$

$

3,844

$

4,336

Current year charges

23

60

135

1,307

Payments

(447

)

(60

)

(3,870

)

(5,643

)

Accrued employee-related costs, end of period

$

109

$

$

109

$

Changes in lease termination related restructuring reserves were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Accrued lease termination costs, beginning of period

$

926

$

2,758

$

1,394

$

3,506

Current year charges

475

460

585

871

Payments

(757

)

(764

)

(1,335

)

(1,923

)

Accrued lease termination costs, end of period

$

644

$

2,454

$

644

$

2,454

Employee and lease termination restructuring reserves are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.

- 11 -


4.

Segment Information

Our operations consist of six homebuilding companies that acquire and develop land and construct and sell single-family homes.  In accordance with ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting , in determining the most appropriate reportable segments, we considered similar economic and other characteristics, including product types, average selling prices, gross profits, production processes, suppliers, subcontractors, regulatory environments, land acquisition results, and underlying demand and supply.  Based on our aggregation analysis, we have not exercised any aggregation of our operating segments, which are represented by the following six reportable segments: Maracay, consisting of operations in Arizona; Pardee, consisting of operations in California and Nevada; Quadrant, consisting of operations in Washington; Trendmaker, consisting of operations in Texas; TRI Pointe, consisting of operations in California and Colorado; and Winchester, consisting of operations in Maryland and Virginia.

Corporate is a non-operating segment that develops and implements company-wide strategic initiatives and provides support to our homebuilding reporting segments by centralizing certain administrative functions, such as marketing, legal, accounting, treasury, insurance and risk management, information technology and human resources, to benefit from economies of scale. Our Corporate non-operating segment also includes general and administrative expenses related to operating our corporate headquarters. A portion of the expenses incurred by Corporate is allocated to the homebuilding reporting segments.

The reportable segments follow the same accounting policies as our consolidated financial statements described in Note 1. Operational results of each reportable segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the reportable segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented.

Total revenues and income before taxes for each of our reportable segments were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Total revenues

Maracay

$

33,574

$

35,045

$

66,051

$

70,275

Pardee

166,064

145,247

251,723

217,709

Quadrant

38,896

31,785

84,525

64,039

Trendmaker

65,982

67,756

122,191

129,156

TRI Pointe

130,735

237,592

Winchester

60,266

62,730

110,693

109,516

Total

$

495,517

$

342,563

$

872,775

$

590,695

Income (loss) before taxes

Maracay

$

1,068

$

2,387

$

2,108

$

6,010

Pardee

67,734

18,656

81,292

25,793

Quadrant

766

5,459

2,347

6,240

Trendmaker

6,040

7,825

10,400

14,202

TRI Pointe

14,564

25,695

Winchester

5,957

6,868

6,338

11,037

Corporate

(9,127

)

(11,168

)

(18,054

)

(21,145

)

Total

$

87,002

$

30,027

$

110,126

$

42,137

- 12 -


Total real estate inventories and total assets for each of our reportable segments, as of the date indicated, were as follows (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Real estate inventories

Maracay

$

189,036

$

153,577

Pardee

999,972

924,362

Quadrant

170,506

153,493

Trendmaker

196,015

176,696

TRI Pointe

696,811

613,666

Winchester

283,413

258,389

Total

$

2,535,753

$

2,280,183

Total assets

Maracay

$

201,628

$

170,932

Pardee

1,067,332

1,000,489

Quadrant

181,502

167,796

Trendmaker

218,531

195,829

TRI Pointe

867,043

781,301

Winchester

311,004

281,547

Corporate

260,147

315,630

Total

$

3,107,187

$

2,913,524

5.

Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the components used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Numerator:

Net income available to

common stockholders

$

54,930

$

24,225

$

70,227

$

31,806

Denominator:

Basic weighted-average

shares outstanding

161,686,570

129,700,000

161,589,310

129,700,000

Effect of dilutive shares:

Stock options and

unvested restricted

stock units

621,529

675,845

Diluted weighted-average

shares outstanding

162,308,099

129,700,000

162,265,155

129,700,000

Earnings per share

Basic

$

0.34

$

0.19

$

0.43

$

0.25

Diluted

$

0.34

$

0.19

$

0.43

$

0.25

Antidilutive unvested restricted

stock units and stock options not

included in diluted earnings per

share

2,343,905

2,563,137

- 13 -


6.

Receivables

Receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Escrow proceeds and other accounts receivable, net

$

23,363

$

9,771

Warranty insurance receivable (Note 15)

10,526

10,047

Notes and contracts receivable

300

300

Total receivables

$

34,189

$

20,118

7.

Real Estate Inventories

Real estate inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Real estate inventories owned:

Homes completed or under construction

$

726,553

$

461,712

Land under development

1,349,956

1,391,303

Land held for future development

256,865

245,673

Model homes

128,839

103,270

Total real estate inventories owned

2,462,213

2,201,958

Real estate inventories not owned:

Land purchase and land option deposits

36,976

44,155

Consolidated inventory held by VIEs

36,564

34,070

Total real estate inventories not owned

73,540

78,225

Total real estate inventories

$

2,535,753

$

2,280,183

Homes completed or under construction is comprised of costs associated with homes in various stages of construction and includes direct construction and related land acquisition and land development costs. Land under development primarily consists of land acquisition and land development costs, which include capitalized interest and real estate taxes, associated with land undergoing improvement activity. Land held for future development principally reflects land acquisition and land development costs related to land where development activity has not yet begun or has been suspended, but is expected to occur in the future.

Real estate inventories not owned represents deposits related to land purchase and land option agreements as well as consolidated inventory held by variable interest entities. For further details, see Note 9, Variable Interest Entities .

During the quarter ended June 30, 2015 the Company sold a 15.72 acre employment center located in the Pacific Highlands Ranch community in the San Diego, California division of our Pardee Homes reporting segment.  The land sold under this sale was classified as land under development and represented $53.0 million of land and lot sales revenue in the consolidated statement of operations for the quarter.

Interest incurred, capitalized and expensed were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Interest incurred

$

15,149

$

6,551

$

30,325

$

10,589

Interest capitalized

(15,149

)

(4,339

)

(30,325

)

(8,148

)

Interest expensed

$

$

2,212

$

$

2,441

Capitalized interest in beginning inventory

$

132,872

$

137,979

$

124,461

$

138,233

Interest capitalized as a cost of inventory

15,149

4,339

30,325

8,148

Interest previously capitalized as a cost of

inventory, included in cost of sales

(7,915

)

(28,553

)

(14,680

)

(32,616

)

Capitalized interest in ending inventory

$

140,106

$

113,765

$

140,106

$

113,765

- 14 -


Interest is capitalized to real estate inventory during development and other qualifying activities. Interest that is capitalized to real estate inventory is included in cost of home sales as relate d units are delivered.  Interest that is expensed as incurred is included in other income (expense).

Real estate inventory impairments and land and lot option abandonments

Real estate inventory impairments and land option abandonments consisted of the following (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Real estate inventory impairments

$

878

$

42

$

1,044

$

52

Land and lot option abandonments and pre-

acquisition costs

300

62

494

520

Total

$

1,178

$

104

$

1,538

$

572

Impairments of homebuilding assets and related charges relate primarily to projects or communities held for development. Within a community that is held for development, there may be individual homes or parcels of land that are currently held for sale. Impairment charges recognized as a result of adjusting individual held-for-sale assets within a community to estimated fair value less cost to sell are also included in the total impairment charges above.  Charges for inventory impairments are expensed to cost of sales.

In addition to owning land and residential lots, we also have option agreements to purchase land and lots at a future date. We have option deposits and capitalized pre-acquisition costs associated with the optioned land and lots. When the economics of a project no longer support acquisition of the land or lots under option, we may elect not to move forward with the acquisition. Option deposits and capitalized pre-acquisition costs associated with the assets under option may be forfeited at that time. Charges for such forfeitures are expensed to cost of sales.

8.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

As of June 30, 2015, we held equity investments in six active real estate partnerships or limited liability companies. Our participation in these entities may be as a developer, a builder, or an investment partner. Our ownership percentage varies from 7% to 55%, depending on the investment, with no controlling interest held in any of these investments.

Investments Held

Our cumulative investment in entities accounted for on the equity method, including our share of earnings and losses, consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Limited partnership and limited liability company interests

$

13,961

$

13,710

General partnership interests

3,364

3,095

Total

$

17,325

$

16,805

Unconsolidated Financial Information

Aggregated assets, liabilities and operating results of the entities we account for as equity-method investments are provided below. Because our ownership interest in these entities varies, a direct relationship does not exist between the information presented below and the amounts that are reflected on our consolidated balance sheets as our investment in unconsolidated entities or on our consolidated statement of operations as equity in loss of unconsolidated entities.

- 15 -


Assets and liabilities of unconsolida ted entities (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Assets

Cash

$

14,374

$

17,154

Receivables

9,550

9,550

Real estate inventories

89,801

95,500

Other assets

814

620

Total assets

$

114,539

$

122,824

Liabilities and equity

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$

11,706

$

10,914

Company's equity

17,325

16,805

Outside interests' equity

85,508

95,105

Total liabilities and equity

$

114,539

$

122,824

Results of operations from unconsolidated entities (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Net sales

$

1,377

$

336

$

1,453

$

407

Other operating expense

(1,805

)

$

(1,146

)

(2,541

)

(2,157

)

Other income

5

$

12

7

14

Net loss

$

(423

)

$

(798

)

$

(1,081

)

$

(1,736

)

Company's equity in loss of

unconsolidated entities

$

(155

)

$

(69

)

$

(81

)

$

(137

)

9.

Variable Interest Entities

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option agreements in order to procure land and residential lots for future development and the construction of homes. The use of such land option agreements generally allows us to reduce the risks associated with direct land ownership and development, and reduces our capital and financial commitments. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we generally provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such deposits are recorded as land purchase and land option deposits under real estate inventories not owned in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

We analyze each of our land option agreements and other similar contracts under the provisions of ASC 810 Consolidation to determine whether the land seller is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. Although we do not have legal title to the underlying land, if we are determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, we will consolidate the VIE in our financial statements and reflect its assets as real estate inventory not owned included in our real estate inventories, its liabilities as debt (nonrecourse) held by VIEs in accrued expenses and other liabilities and the net equity of the VIE owners as noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we consider, among other things, whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Such activities would include, among other things, determining or limiting the scope or purpose of the VIE, selling or transferring property owned or controlled by the VIE, or arranging financing for the VIE.

Creditors of the entities with which we have land option agreements have no recourse against us. The maximum exposure to loss under our land option agreements is limited to non-refundable option deposits and any capitalized pre-acquisition costs. In some cases, we have also contracted to complete development work at a fixed cost on behalf of the land owner and budget shortfalls and savings will be borne by us.

- 16 -


The following provides a summary of our interests in land option agreements (in thousands):

June 30, 2015

December 31, 2014

Remaining

Consolidated

Remaining

Consolidated

Purchase

Inventory

Purchase

Inventory

Deposits

Price

Held by VIEs

Deposits

Price

Held by VIEs

Consolidated VIEs

$

7,359

$

36,038

$

36,564

$

8,071

$

43,432

$

34,070

Unconsolidated VIEs

7,760

72,298

N/A

13,309

129,637

N/A

Other land option agreements

29,216

283,969

N/A

30,846

284,819

N/A

Total

$

44,335

$

392,305

$

36,564

$

52,226

$

457,888

$

34,070

Unconsolidated VIEs represent land option agreements that were not consolidated because we were not the primary beneficiary. Other land option agreements were not considered VIEs.

In addition to the deposits presented in the table above, our exposure to loss related to our land option contracts consisted of capitalized pre-acquisition costs of $4.9 million and $5.3 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. These pre-acquisition costs were included in real estate inventories as land under development on our consolidated balance sheets.

10.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In connection with the Merger, $139.3 million of goodwill has been recorded as of June 30, 2015.  For further details on the goodwill, see Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company.

We have two intangible assets recorded as of June 30, 2015, including an existing trade name from the acquisition of Maracay in 2006 which has a 20 year useful life and a new trade name, TRI Pointe Homes, resulting from the Merger which has an indefinite useful life. For further details on the TRI Pointe Homes trade name see Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company.

Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30, 2015

December 31, 2014

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Carrying

Accumulated

Carrying

Carrying

Accumulated

Carrying

Amount

Amortization

Amount

Amount

Amortization

Amount

Goodwill

$

139,303

$

$

139,303

$

139,304

$

$

139,304

Trade names

27,979

(4,986

)

22,993

27,979

(4,720

)

23,259

Total

$

167,282

$

(4,986

)

$

162,296

$

167,283

$

(4,720

)

$

162,563

The remaining useful life of our amortizing intangible asset related to the Maracay trade name was 10.7 and 11.2 years as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Amortization expense related to this intangible asset was $133,000 for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively and was $266,000 for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  Amortization of this intangible asset was charged to sales and marketing expense.  Our $17.3 million indefinite life intangible asset related to the TRI Pointe Homes trade name is not amortizing.

Expected amortization of our intangible asset related to Maracay for the remainder of 2015, the next four years and thereafter is (in thousands):

Remainder of 2015

$

268

2016

534

2017

534

2018

534

2019

534

Thereafter

3,289

Total

$

5,693

- 17 -


11.

Other Assets

Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Prepaid expenses

$

22,758

$

29,111

Refundable fees and other deposits

16,557

15,581

Development rights, held for future use or sale

6,447

7,409

Deferred loan costs

24,669

23,686

Operating properties and equipment, net

10,511

11,719

Income tax receivable

10,713

Other

6,408

7,186

Total

$

87,350

$

105,405

12.

Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Accrued payroll and related costs

$

16,437

$

24,717

Warranty reserves (Note 15)

35,375

33,270

Estimated cost for completion of real estate inventories

54,771

54,437

Customer deposits

20,101

14,229

Debt (nonrecourse) held by VIEs (Note 9)

8,337

9,512

Income tax liability to Weyerhaeuser (Note 18)

15,894

15,659

Accrued income taxes payable

3,883

Liability for uncertain tax positions (Note 17)

16,095

13,797

Accrued interest

2,632

3,059

Accrued insurance expense

4,199

9,180

Other

27,698

32,149

Total

$

205,422

$

210,009

13.

Senior Notes, Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Seller Financed Loans

Senior Notes

Senior Notes consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

4.375% Senior Notes due June 15, 2019, net of discount

$

445,955

$

445,501

5.875% Senior Notes due June 15, 2024, net of discount

442,312

442,001

Total

$

888,267

$

887,502

As discussed in Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company , on the Closing Date, TRI Pointe assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of the Senior Notes. The 2019 Notes were issued at 98.89% of their aggregate principal amount and the 2024 Notes were issued at 98.15% of their aggregate principal amount. The net proceeds of $861.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts, from the offering were deposited into two separate escrow accounts following the closing of the offering on June 13, 2014.

The 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes mature on June 15, 2019 and June 15, 2024, respectively. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15. As of June 30, 2015, no principal has been paid on the Senior Notes, and there was $22.1 million of capitalized debt financing costs, included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet, related to the Senior Notes that will amortize over the lives of the Senior Notes. Accrued interest related to the Senior Notes was $1.9 million as of June 30, 2015.

- 18 -


Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

Unsecured revolving credit facility consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Unsecured revolving credit facility

$

399,392

$

260,000

In May 2015, the Company amended its unsecured credit revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) from $425 million to $550 million.  The Credit Facility matures on July 1, 2018, and contains a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit. The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility in the ordinary course of business to fund its operations, including its land development and homebuilding activities. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will be governed by, among other things, a borrowing base. Interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility will be based on either a daily Eurocurrency base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, in either case, plus a spread ranging from 1.45% to 2.20%, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2015, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was $399.4 million with an interest rate of 2.14% per annum and $141.1 million of availability after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit.  As of June 30, 2015 there was $2.6 million of capitalized debt financing costs, included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet, related to the Credit Facility that will amortize over the life of the Credit Facility, maturing on July 1, 2018.  Accrued interest related to the Credit Facility was $685,000 as of June 30, 2015.

At June 30, 2015 we had outstanding letters of credit of $9.5 million.  These letters of credit were issued to secure various financial obligations.  We believe it is not probable that any outstanding letters of credit will be drawn upon.

Seller Financed Loans

Seller financed loans consisted of the following (in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Seller financed loans

$

12,390

$

14,677

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $12.4 million outstanding related to seller financed loans to acquire lots for the construction of homes.  Principal and interest payments on these loans are due at various maturity dates, including at the time individual homes associated with the acquired land are delivered.  As of June 30, 2015, the seller financed loans accrue interest at a weighted average rate of 6.97% per annum, with interest calculated on a daily basis. Any remaining unpaid balance on these loans is due in May 2016. Accrued interest on these loans were $25,000 as of June 30, 2015.

Interest Incurred

During the three month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred interest of $15.1 million and $6.6 million, respectively, related to all notes payable, Senior Notes and debt payable to Weyerhaeuser outstanding during the period. Of the interest incurred, $15.1 million and $4.3 million was capitalized to inventory for the six-month period ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in interest incurred was amortization of deferred financing and Senior Note discount costs of $1.3 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2015 with no deferred financing cost in the same prior year period. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred interest of $30.3 million and $10.6 million, respectively, related to all notes payable, Senior Notes and debt payable to Weyerhaeuser outstanding during the period.   Of the interest incurred, $30.3 million and $8.1 million was capitalized to inventory for the period ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  Included in interest incurred was amortization of deferred financing and Senior Note discount costs of $2.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2015 with no deferred financing cost in the same prior year period.  Accrued interest related to all outstanding debt at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $2.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

Covenant Requirements

The Senior Notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, or merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets. These limitations are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions.

Under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to comply with certain financial covenants, including but not limited to (i) a minimum consolidated tangible net worth; (ii) a maximum total leverage ratio; and (iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio.

- 19 -


The Company was in compliance with all applicable financial covenants as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

14.

Fair Value Disclosures

Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at measurement date and requires assets and liabilities carried at fair value to be classified and disclosed in the following three categories:

·

Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets

·

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are inactive; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets at measurement date

·

Level 3—Valuations derived from techniques where one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable in active markets at measurement date

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

A summary of assets and liabilities at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, related to our financial instruments, measured at fair value on a recurring basis, is set forth below (in thousands):

June 30, 2015

December 31, 2014

Hierarchy

Book Value

Fair Value

Book Value

Fair Value

Receivables (1)

Level 3

$

34,189

$

34,189

$

20,118

$

20,118

Senior Notes (2)

Level 2

888,267

879,750

887,502

896,625

Unsecured revolving credit facility (3)

Level 3

399,392

399,392

260,000

260,000

Seller financed loans (4)

Level 3

12,390

12,390

14,677

14,677

At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value.

(1)

The estimated fair value of our receivables was based on the discounted value of the expected future cash flows using current rates for similar receivables. The book value of our receivables equaled the fair value as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 due to the short-term nature of the remaining receivables.

(2)

The estimated fair value of our Senior Notes at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is based on quoted market prices.

(3)

We believe that the carrying value of our Credit Facility approximates fair value based on the short term nature of the current market rate amended on May 18, 2015.

(4)

We believe that the carrying value of our Seller financed loans approximates fair value based on a two year treasury curve analysis.

Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets

Nonfinancial assets include items such as real estate inventories and long-lived assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when events and circumstances indicate the carrying value is not recoverable. The following table presents impairment charges and the remaining net fair value for nonfinancial assets that were measured during the periods presented (in thousands):

Six Months Ended

Year Ended

June 30, 2015

December 31, 2014

Fair Value

Fair Value

Impairment

Net of

Impairment

Net of

Hierarchy

Charge

Impairment

Charge

Impairment

Real estate inventories

Level 3

$

1,044

$

15,348

$

931

$

20,329

- 20 -


15.

Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

Lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been and may be instituted or asserted against us in the normal course of business, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We are also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, employment practices and environmental protection. As a result, we are subject to periodic examinations or inquiry by agencies administering these laws and regulations.

We record a reserve for potential legal claims and regulatory matters when they are probable of occurring and a potential loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue for these matters based on facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revise these estimates when necessary.

In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting outcomes of legal claims and related contingencies, we generally cannot predict their ultimate resolution, related timing or eventual loss. Accordingly, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of any matter, if in excess of a related accrual or if no accrual was made, could be material to our financial statements.

Warranty

Warranty reserves are accrued as home deliveries occur. Our warranty reserves on homes delivered will vary based on product type and geographic area and also depending on state and local laws. The warranty reserve is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and represents expected future costs based on our historical experience over previous years. Estimated warranty costs are charged to cost of home sales in the period in which the related home sales revenue is recognized.

We maintain general liability insurance designed to protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from construction-related claims. We also generally require our subcontractors and design professionals to indemnify us for liabilities arising from their work, subject to various limitations. However, such indemnity is significantly limited with respect to certain subcontractors that are added to our general liability insurance policy. Included in our warranty reserve accrual are allowances to cover our estimated costs of self-insured retentions and deductible amounts under these policies and estimated costs for claims that may not be covered by applicable insurance or indemnities.  Estimation of these accruals include consideration of our claims history, including current claims and estimates of claims incurred but not yet reported.  In addition, we record expected recoveries from insurance carriers when proceeds are probable and estimable.  Outstanding warranty insurance receivables were $10.5 million and $10.0 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Warranty insurance receivables are recorded in receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

There can be no assurance that the terms and limitations of the limited warranty will be effective against claims made by homebuyers, that we will be able to renew our insurance coverage or renew it at reasonable rates, that we will not be liable for damages, cost of repairs, and/or the expense of litigation surrounding possible construction defects, soil subsidence or building related claims or that claims will not arise out of uninsurable events or circumstances not covered by insurance and not subject to effective indemnification agreements with certain subcontractors.

Warranty reserves consisted of the following (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Warranty reserves, beginning of period

$

33,965

$

24,378

$

33,270

$

24,450

Warranty reserves accrued

3,354

2,153

6,226

3,764

Adjustments to pre-existing reserves

999

232

1,300

1,018

Warranty expenditures

(2,943

)

(2,439

)

(5,421

)

(4,908

)

Warranty reserves, end of period

$

35,375

$

24,324

$

35,375

$

24,324

Performance Bonds

We obtain surety bonds in the normal course of business to ensure completion of certain infrastructure improvements of our projects. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding surety bonds totaling $407.9 million and $355.2 million, respectively. The beneficiaries of the bonds are various municipalities.

- 21 -


16.

Stock-Based Compensation

2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Company’s stock compensation plan, the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2013 Incentive Plan”), was adopted by TRI Pointe in January 2013 and amended with the approval of our stockholders in 2014. The 2013 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation rights, common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards. The 2013 Incentive Plan will automatically expire on the tenth anniversary of its effective date. Our board of directors may terminate or amend the 2013 Incentive Plan at any time, subject to any requirement of stockholder approval required by applicable law, rule or regulation.

As amended, the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2013 Incentive Plan is 11,727,833 shares. To the extent that shares of our common stock subject to an outstanding option, stock appreciation right, stock award or performance award granted under the 2013 Incentive Plan are not issued or delivered by reason of the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award or the settlement of such award in cash, then such shares of our common stock generally shall again be available under the 2013 Incentive Plan. As of June 30, 2015 there were 9,525,870 shares available for future grant under the 2013 Incentive Plan.

Converted Awards

Under the Transaction Agreement, each outstanding Weyerhaeuser equity award held by an employee of WRECO was converted into a similar equity award with TRI Pointe, based on the final exchange ratio of 2.1107 (the “Exchange Ratio”), rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock. The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-197461) on July 16, 2014 to register 4,105,953 shares related to these equity awards. The converted awards have the same terms and conditions as the Weyerhaeuser equity awards except that all performance share units were surrendered in exchange for time-vesting restricted stock units without any performance-based vesting conditions or requirements and the exercise price of each converted stock option is equal to the original exercise price divided by the Exchange Ratio. There will be no future grants under the WRECO equity incentive plans.  Refer to Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company , for additional information on the Merger.

The following table presents compensation expense recognized related to all stock-based awards (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Total stock-based compensation

$

3,161

$

1,410

$

5,542

$

2,703

As of June 30, 2015, total unrecognized stock-based compensation related to all stock-based awards was $22.4 million and the weighted average term over which the expense was expected to be recognized was 1.94 years.

Summary of Stock Option Activity

The following table presents a summary of stock option awards for the six months ended June 30, 2015:

Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Aggregate

Exercise

Remaining

Intrinsic

Price

Contractual

Value

Options

Per Share

Life

(in thousands)

Options outstanding at December 31, 2014

3,467,086

$

13.05

6.0

$

7,642

Granted

Exercised

(91,880

)

10.63

Forfeited

(11,303

)

8.39

Options outstanding at June 30, 2015

3,363,903

13.12

5.6

7,349

Options exercisable at June 30, 2015

2,872,860

12.41

4.9

8,309

- 22 -


Summary of Restricted Stock Unit Activity

The following table presents a summary of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for the six months ended June 30, 2015:

Weighted

Average

Aggregate

Restricted

Grant Date

Intrinsic

Stock

Fair Value

Value

Units

Per Share

(in thousands)

Nonvested RSUs at December 31, 2014

900,547

$

15.62

$

13,461

Granted

1,511,491

11.46

17,315

Vested

(453,685

)

13.85

Forfeited

(10,193

)

13.58

Nonvested RSUs at June 30, 2015

1,948,160

12.20

29,807

On March 5, 2015, the Company granted an aggregate of 440,800 restricted stock units to employees and officers. The restricted stock units granted vest annually on the anniversary of the grant date over a three year period.  The fair value of each restricted stock award granted on March 5, 2015 was measured using a price of $14.97 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant.  Each award will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

On March 9, 2015, the Company granted 411,804, 384,351, and 274,536 performance-based RSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, with 1/3 of the performance-based RSU amounts being allocated to each of the three following separate performance goals: total shareholder return (compared to a group of similarly sized homebuilders); earnings per share; and stock price. The performance-based restricted stock units granted will vest in each case, if at all, based on the percentage of attainment of the applicable performance goal. The performance periods for the performance-based RSUs with vesting based on total shareholder return and earnings per share are January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The performance period for the performance-based RSUs with vesting based on stock price is January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. The fair value of the performance-based RSUs related to the total shareholder return and stock price performance goals was determined to be $7.55 and $7.90 per share, respectively, based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of the performance-based RSUs related to the earnings per share goal was measured using a price of $14.57 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each grant will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the expected vesting period.

As restricted stock units vest, a portion of the shares awarded is generally withheld to cover employee taxes. As a result, the number of restricted stock units vested and the number of shares of TRI Pointe common stock issued will differ.

17.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires an asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the years in which taxes are expected to be paid or recovered.  Each quarter we assess our deferred tax asset to determine whether all or any portion of the asset is more likely than not unrealizable under ASC 740.  We are required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of the asset we conclude is more likely than not to be unrealizable.  Our assessment considers, among other things, the nature, frequency and severity of our current and cumulative losses, forecasts of our future taxable income, the duration of statutory carryforward periods and tax planning alternatives.

We had net deferred tax assets of $148.4 million and $157.8 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  We had a valuation allowance related to those net deferred tax assets of $4.6 million and $6.2 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  The Company will continue to evaluate both positive and negative evidence in determining the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. Changes in positive and negative evidence, including differences between the Company's future operating results and the estimates utilized in the determination of the valuation allowance, could result in changes in the Company's estimate of the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future results could have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position. Also, changes in existing federal and state tax laws and tax rates could affect future tax results and the valuation allowance against the Company's deferred tax assets.

- 23 -


Our provision for income taxes totaled $30.2 million and $5.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  Our provision for income taxes totaled $38.1 million and $10.3 million for the six months en ded June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The Company classifies any interest and penalties related to income taxes assessed by jurisdiction as part of income tax expense.  The Company had $16.1 million and $13.8 million of liabilities for uncertain tax p ositions recorded as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  The Company has not been assessed interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions related to prior years.

18.

Related Party Transactions

Prior to the Merger, WRECO was a wholly owned subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser.  Weyerhaeuser provided certain services including payroll processing and related employee benefits, other corporate services such as corporate governance, cash management and other treasury services, administrative services such as government relations, tax, internal audit, legal, accounting, human resources and equity-based compensation plan administration, lease of office space, aviation services and insurance coverage. WRECO was allocated a portion of Weyerhaeuser corporate general and administrative costs on either a proportional cost or usage basis.

Weyerhaeuser-allocated corporate general and administrative expenses were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Weyerhaeuser-allocated costs

$

$

5,188

$

$

10,735

These expenses are not indicative of the actual level of expense WRECO would have incurred if it had operated as an independent company or of expenses expected to be incurred in the future after the Closing Date.

TRI Pointe has certain liabilities with Weyerhaeuser related to a tax sharing agreement.   As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had an income tax liability to Weyerhaeuser of $15.9 million and $15.7 million, respectively, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying balance sheet.

In January of 2015, TRI Pointe acquired 46 lots located in Castle Rock, Colorado, for a purchase price of approximately $2.8 million from an entity managed by an affiliate of the Starwood Capital Group. This acquisition was approved by TRI Pointe independent directors.

19.

Supplemental Disclosure to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

The following are supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

Six Months Ended

June 30,

2015

2014

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest, net of amounts capitalized

$

$

97

Income taxes

$

11,354

$

14,962

Supplemental disclosures of noncash activities:

Amortization of senior note discount

$

765

$

Effect of net consolidation and de-consolidation of

variable interest entities:

Increase in consolidated real estate

inventory not owned

$

3,629

$

28,208

Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities

$

300

$

Increase in noncontrolling interests

$

(3,929

)

$

(28,208

)

- 24 -


20.

Supplemental Guarantor Information

On the Closing Date, the Company assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of the Senior Notes.  Additionally, all of TRI Pointe’s wholly owned subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Company’s unsecured $550 million revolving credit facility, including WRECO and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which they jointly and severally guaranteed TRI Pointe’s obligations with respect to the Senior Notes.

Presented below are the condensed consolidating balance sheets at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and cash flows for the six month period ended June 30, 2015.  TRI Pointe’s non-guarantor subsidiaries represent less than 3% on an individual and aggregate basis of consolidated total assets, total revenues, income from operations before taxes and cash flow from operating activities.  Therefore, the non-guarantor subsidiaries’ information is not separately presented in the tables below.

As discussed in Note 1, the Merger was treated as a “reverse acquisition” with WRECO being considered the accounting acquirer.  Accordingly, the financial statements reflect the historical results of WRECO for all periods and do not include the historical financial information of TRI Pointe prior to the Closing Date.  Subsequent to the Closing Date, the consolidated financial statements reflect the results of the combined company.  As a result, we have not included condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three or six months ended June 30, 2014 or cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 because those results are of WRECO and are already included on the face of the consolidated financial statements.  In addition, there is no financial information for TRI Pointe, issuer of the Senior Notes, in the periods prior to the Closing Date.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (in thousands):

June 30, 2015

Consolidated

TRI Pointe

Guarantor

Consolidating

TRI Pointe

Homes, Inc.

Subsidiaries

Adjustments

Homes, Inc.

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

67,329

$

54,578

$

$

121,907

Receivables

12,721

21,468

34,189

Intercompany receivables

851,310

(851,310

)

Real estate inventories

696,810

1,838,943

2,535,753

Investments in unconsolidated entities

17,325

17,325

Goodwill and other intangible assets, net

162,296

162,296

Investments in subsidiaries

1,007,550

(1,007,550

)

Deferred tax assets

23,630

124,737

148,367

Other assets

38,948

48,402

87,350

Total Assets

$

2,860,594

$

2,105,453

$

(1,858,860

)

$

3,107,187

Liabilities

Accounts payable

$

4,449

$

46,560

$

$

51,009

Intercompany payables

851,310

(851,310

)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

27,725

177,697

205,422

Unsecured revolving credit facility

399,392

399,392

Seller financed loans

11,990

400

12,390

Senior notes

888,267

888,267

Total Liabilities

1,331,823

1,075,967

(851,310

)

1,556,480

Equity

Total stockholders' equity

1,528,771

1,007,550

(1,007,550

)

1,528,771

Noncontrolling interests

21,936

21,936

Total Equity

1,528,771

1,029,486

(1,007,550

)

1,550,707

Total Liabilities and Equity

$

2,860,594

$

2,105,453

$

(1,858,860

)

$

3,107,187

- 25 -


20.

Supplemental Guarantor Information (continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (in thousands):

December 31, 2014

Consolidated

TRI Pointe

Guarantor

Consolidating

TRI Pointe

Homes, Inc.

Subsidiaries

Adjustments

Homes, Inc.

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

105,888

$

64,741

$

$

170,629

Receivables

5,050

15,068

20,118

Intercompany receivables

797,480

(797,480

)

Real estate inventories

613,665

1,666,518

2,280,183

Investments in unconsolidated entities

16,805

16,805

Goodwill and other intangible assets, net

156,603

5,960

162,563

Investments in subsidiaries

941,397

(941,397

)

Deferred tax assets

23,630

134,191

157,821

Other assets

55,199

50,206

105,405

Total Assets

$

2,698,912

$

1,953,489

$

(1,738,877

)

$

2,913,524

Liabilities

Accounts payable

$

25,800

$

43,060

$

$

68,860

Intercompany payables

797,480

(797,480

)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

57,353

152,656

210,009

Unsecured revolving credit facility

260,000

260,000

Seller financed loans

14,077

600

14,677

Senior notes

887,502

887,502

Total Liabilities

1,244,732

993,796

(797,480

)

1,441,048

Equity

Total stockholders' equity

1,454,180

941,397

(941,397

)

1,454,180

Noncontrolling interests

18,296

18,296

Total Equity

1,454,180

959,693

(941,397

)

1,472,476

Total Liabilities and Equity

$

2,698,912

$

1,953,489

$

(1,738,877

)

$

2,913,524

- 26 -


20.

Supplemental Guarantor Information (continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (in thousands - unaudited):

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015

Consolidated

TRI Pointe

Guarantor

Consolidating

TRI Pointe

Homes, Inc.

Subsidiaries

Adjustments

Homes, Inc.

Revenues:

Home sales

$

130,552

$

296,686

$

$

427,238

Land and lot sales

67,490

67,490

Other operations

789

789

Total revenues

130,552

364,965

495,517

Expenses:

Cost of home sales

106,365

235,377

341,742

Cost of land and lot sales

11,564

11,564

Other operations

592

592

Sales and marketing

5,447

20,187

25,634

General and administrative

13,260

15,039

28,299

Restructuring charges

(86

)

584

498

Total expenses

124,986

283,343

408,329

Income from operations

5,566

81,622

87,188

Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities

(155

)

(155

)

Other income, net

(151

)

120

(31

)

Income before taxes

5,415

81,587

87,002

Provision for income taxes

(2,388

)

(27,852

)

(30,240

)

Equity of net income of subsidiaries

51,903

(51,903

)

Net income

54,930

53,735

(51,903

)

56,762

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

(1,832

)

(1,832

)

Net income available to common stockholders

$

54,930

$

51,903

$

(51,903

)

$

54,930

- 27 -


20.

Supplemental Guarantor Information (continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (in thousands - unaudited):

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Consolidated

TRI Pointe

Guarantor

Consolidating

TRI Pointe

Homes, Inc.

Subsidiaries

Adjustments

Homes, Inc.

Revenues:

Home sales

$

237,410

$

564,093

$

$

801,503

Land and lot sales

69,490

69,490

Other operations

1,782

1,782

Total revenues

237,410

635,365

872,775

Expenses:

Cost of home sales

193,346

448,302

641,648

Cost of land and lot sales

13,873

13,873

Other operations

1,154

1,154

Sales and marketing

10,428

38,492

48,920

General and administrative

25,932

30,546

56,478

Restructuring charges

(86

)

806

720

Total expenses

229,620

533,173

762,793

Income from operations

7,790

102,192

109,982

Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities

(81

)

(81

)

Other income, net

(112

)

337

225

Income before taxes

7,678

102,448

110,126

Provision for income taxes

(3,215

)

(34,852

)

(38,067

)

Equity of net income of subsidiaries

65,764

(65,764

)

Net income

70,227

67,596

(65,764

)

72,059

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

(1,832

)

(1,832

)

Net income available to common stockholders

$

70,227

$

65,764

$

(65,764

)

$

70,227

- 28 -


20.

Supplemental Guarantor Information (continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (in thousands - unaudited):

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Consolidated

TRI Pointe

Guarantor

Consolidating

TRI Pointe

Homes, Inc.

Subsidiaries

Adjustments

Homes, Inc.

Cash flows from operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities

$

(113,102

)

$

(63,993

)

$

$

(177,095

)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment

(427

)

(186

)

(613

)

Investments in unconsolidated entities

(1,257

)

(1,257

)

Intercompany

(58,117

)

58,117

Net cash used in investing activities

(58,544

)

(1,443

)

58,117

(1,870

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Borrowings from debt

140,000

140,000

Repayment of debt

(2,695

)

(200

)

(2,895

)

Debt issuance costs

(2,688

)

(2,688

)

Net repayments of debt held by variable interest entities

(875

)

(875

)

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

2,034

2,034

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(4,155

)

(4,155

)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based awards

660

660

Excess tax benefits of share-based awards

352

352

Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units

(2,190

)

(2,190

)

Intercompany

58,117

(58,117

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

133,087

55,273

(58,117

)

130,243

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(38,559

)

(10,163

)

(48,722

)

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period

105,888

64,741

170,629

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period

$

67,329

$

54,578

$

$

121,907

- 29 -


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements relating to future events of our intentions, beliefs, expectations, predictions for the future and other matters that are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

These statements:

·

use forward-looking terminology;

·

are based on various assumptions made by TRI Pointe; and

·

may not prove to be accurate because of risks and uncertainties surrounding the assumptions that are made.

Factors listed in this section – as well as other factors not included – may cause actual results to differ significantly from the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There is no guarantee that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will occur, or if any of the events occurs, there is no guarantee of what effect it will have on our operations or financial condition.

We will not update the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise required by law.

Forward-Looking Statements

These forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “would,” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes, including, without limitation, our transaction with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (WRECO). These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding expected benefits of the WRECO transaction, integration plans and expected synergies therefrom, and our anticipated future financial and operating performance and results, including our estimates for growth.

Forward-looking statements are based on a number of factors, including the expected effect of:

·

the economy;

·

laws and regulations;

·

adverse litigation outcome and the adequacy of reserves;

·

changes in accounting principles;

·

projected benefit payments; and

·

projected tax rates and credits.

Risks, Uncertainties and Assumptions

The major risks and uncertainties – and assumptions that are made – that affect our business and may cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

·

the effect of general economic conditions, including employment rates, housing starts, interest rate levels, availability of financing for home mortgages and strength of the U.S. dollar;

·

market demand for our products, which is related to the strength of the various U.S. business segments and U.S. and international economic conditions;

·

levels of competition;

·

the successful execution of our internal performance plans, including restructuring and cost reduction initiatives;

·

global economic conditions;

·

raw material prices;

- 30 -


·

energy prices;

·

the effect of weather, including the continuing drought in California;

·

the risk of loss from earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, floods, droughts, windstorms, hurricanes, pest infestations and other natural disasters;

·

transportation costs;

·

federal and state tax policies;

·

the effect of land use, environment and other governmental regulations;

·

legal proceedings;

·

risks relating to any unforeseen changes to or effects on liabilities, future capital expenditures, revenues, expenses, earnings, synergies, indebtedness, financial condition, losses and future prospects;

·

the risk that disruptions from the transaction with WRECO will harm our business;

·

our ability to achieve the benefits of the transaction with WRECO in the estimated amount and the anticipated timeframe, if at all;

·

our ability to integrate WRECO successfully and to achieve the anticipated synergies therefrom;

·

change in accounting principles;

·

risks related to unauthorized access to our computer systems, theft of our customer’s confidential information or other forms of cyber-attack; and

·

other factors described in “Risk Factors.”

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our  consolidated financial statements and related condensed notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our securities. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, and subsequent reports on Form 8-K, which discuss our business in greater detail. The section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and similar disclosures in our other SEC filings, discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the information in this report and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding to invest in, or maintain your investment in, our common stock.

Reverse Acquisition and Formation of TRI Pointe Group, Inc.

On July 7, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. consummated the previously announced merger (the “Merger”) of our wholly owned subsidiary, Topaz Acquisition, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), with and into Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (“WRECO”), with WRECO surviving the Merger and becoming our wholly owned subsidiary, as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013 (the “Transaction Agreement”), by and among us, Weyerhaeuser Company (“Weyerhaeuser”), the Company, WRECO and Merger Sub. The Merger is accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). For accounting purposes, the Merger is treated as a “reverse acquisition” and WRECO is considered the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, WRECO is reflected as the predecessor and acquirer and therefore the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of WRECO for all periods presented and do not include the historical financial statements of TRI Pointe prior to the Closing Date. Subsequent to the Closing Date, the consolidated financial statements reflect the results of the combined company.

For further information on the Merger, see Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company , of the condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q.  In the Merger, each issued and outstanding WRECO common share was converted into 1.297 shares of TRI Pointe common stock. The historical issued and outstanding WRECO common shares (100,000,000 common shares for all periods presented prior to the Merger) have been recast as 129,700,000 common shares of the Company for all periods prior to the Merger) in all periods presented to reflect this conversion.

On July 7, 2015, TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Homes”), reorganized its corporate structure (the “Reorganization”) whereby TRI Pointe Homes became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Group”).  Please see "Note Regarding this Quarterly Report" above regarding the reorganization of our corporate structure on July 7, 2015.

- 31 -


Consolidated Financial Data (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2015

2014

2015

2014

Revenues:

Home sales

$

427,238

$

309,609

$

801,503

$

551,511

Land and lot sales

67,490

27,512

69,490

30,899

Other operations

789

5,442

1,782

8,285

Total revenues

495,517

342,563

872,775

590,695

Expenses:

Cost of home sales

341,742

242,709

641,648

433,977

Cost of land and lot sales

11,564

24,765

13,873

27,928

Other operations

592

567

1,154

2,199

Sales and marketing

25,634

23,798

48,920

44,703

General and administrative

28,299

18,184

56,478

36,189

Restructuring charges

498

520

720

2,178

Total expenses

408,329

310,543

762,793

547,174

Income from operations

87,188

32,020

109,982

43,521

Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities

(155

)

(69

)

(81

)

(137

)

Transaction expenses

(448

)

(506

)

Other income (expense), net

(31

)

(1,476

)

225

(741

)

Income before taxes

87,002

30,027

110,126

42,137

Provision for income taxes

(30,240

)

(5,802

)

(38,067

)

(10,331

)

Net income

56,762

24,225

72,059

31,806

Less: net income attributable to

noncontrolling interests

(1,832

)

(1,832

)

Net income available to common stockholders

$

54,930

$

24,225

$

70,227

$

31,806

Earnings per share

Basic

$

0.34

$

0.19

$

0.43

$

0.25

Diluted

$

0.34

$

0.19

$

0.43

$

0.25

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

Net New Home Orders, Average Selling Communities and Monthly Absorption Rates by Segment

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

Percentage Change

Net New

Average

Monthly

Net New

Average

Monthly

Net New

Average

Monthly

Home

Selling

Absorption

Home

Selling

Absorption

Home

Selling

Absorption

Orders

Communities

Rates

Orders

Communities

Rates

Orders

Communities

Rates

Maracay

184

18.0

3.4

120

17.0

2.4

53

%

6

%

45

%

Pardee

355

23.5

5.0

284

20.0

4.7

25

%

18

%

6

%

Quadrant

116

10.8

3.6

106

14.0

2.5

9

%

(23

)%

43

%

Trendmaker

124

26.5

1.6

166

24.5

2.3

(25

)%

8

%

(31

)%

TRI Pointe

365

26.5

4.6

N/A

N/A

N/A

Winchester

94

14.3

2.2

87

22.0

1.3

8

%

(35

)%

67

%

Total

1,238

119.5

3.5

763

97.5

2.6

62

%

23

%

32

%

Net new home orders for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased 62% to 1,238, compared to 763 during the prior year period.  Our overall absorption rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was 10.4 per average selling community (3.5 monthly), compared to 7.8 per average selling community (2.6 monthly) during the prior year period.  The increase in net new home orders, average selling communities and monthly absorption rate was primarily the result of the addition of TRI Pointe, which had 365 orders, 26.5 average selling communities and a monthly absorption rate of 4.6 per average selling community in the three months ended June 30, 2015 with no comparable amounts in the prior year period.  In addition, the increase in net new home orders was positively impacted by an increase in our monthly absorption rate in all of our segments compared to the prior year period except for Trendmaker, which experienced a decrease as a result of a slowdown in the premium housing market in Houston driven by inclement weather during the period and by the uncertainty around oil prices.

- 32 -


Backlog Units, Dollar Value and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)

As of June 30, 2015

As of June 30, 2014

Percentage Change

Backlog

Average

Backlog

Average

Backlog

Average

Backlog

Dollar

Sales

Backlog

Dollar

Sales

Backlog

Dollar

Sales

Units

Value

Price

Units

Value

Price

Units

Value

Price

Maracay

274

$

106,347

$

388

149

$

61,255

$

411

84

%

74

%

(6

)%

Pardee

471

296,298

629

428

238,276

557

10

%

24

%

13

%

Quadrant

199

87,233

438

155

77,671

501

28

%

12

%

(13

)%

Trendmaker

243

128,645

529

262

136,115

520

(7

)%

(5

)%

2

%

TRI Pointe

631

449,080

712

N/A

N/A

N/A

Winchester

180

132,244

735

197

156,908

796

(9

)%

(16

)%

(8

)%

Total

1,998

$

1,199,847

$

601

1,191

$

670,225

$

563

68

%

79

%

7

%

Backlog units reflects the number of homes, net of actual cancellations experienced during the period, for which we have entered into sales contracts with customers but for which we have not yet delivered the homes. Homes in backlog are generally delivered within three to nine months, although we may experience cancellations of sales contracts prior to delivery. Our cancellation rate of buyers who contracted to buy a home but did not close escrow (as a percentage of overall orders) was 16% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The dollar value of backlog was $1.2 billion as of June 30, 2015, an increase of $529.6 million, or 79%, compared to $670.2 million as of June 30, 2014.  This increase is due to an increase in the number of homes in backlog of 807, or 68%, to 1,998 homes as of June 30, 2015 from 1,191 homes as of June 30, 2014, in addition to an increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog of $38,000, or 7%, to $601,000 as of June 30, 2015 compared to $563,000 as of June 30, 2014.  The increase in the number of homes in backlog and the average sales price of homes in backlog was mainly the result of the addition of TRI Pointe, which had 631 homes in backlog and an average sales price in backlog of $712,000 as of June 30, 2015.  In addition to the increases associated with TRI Pointe in the current year period, backlog units and backlog dollar value increased at three of our reporting segments existing in the prior year period, with the exception of Trendmaker and Winchester.

New Homes Delivered, Homes Sales Revenue and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

Percentage Change

New

Home

Average

New

Home

Average

New

Home

Average

Homes

Sales

Sales

Homes

Sales

Sales

Homes

Sales

Sales

Delivered

Revenue

Price

Delivered

Revenue

Price

Delivered

Revenue

Price

Maracay

91

$

33,574

$

369

93

$

35,045

$

377

(2

)%

(4

)%

(2

)%

Pardee

242

110,231

456

246

118,905

483

(2

)%

(7

)%

(6

)%

Quadrant

87

35,689

410

67

25,180

376

30

%

42

%

9

%

Trendmaker

123

64,652

526

139

67,756

487

(12

)%

(5

)%

8

%

TRI Pointe

174

130,553

750

N/A

N/A

N/A

Winchester

81

52,539

649

83

62,723

756

(2

)%

(16

)%

(14

)%

Total

798

$

427,238

$

535

628

$

309,609

$

493

27

%

38

%

9

%

Home sales revenue increased $117.6 million, or 38%, to $427.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from $309.6 million for the prior year period. The increase was comprised of: (i) $91.0 million related to an increase in average sales price of $42,000 per home to $535,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from $493,000 in the prior year period; and (ii) $26.6 million due to a 27% increase in homes delivered to 798 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from 628 in the prior year period. The increase in the average sales price and new home deliveries was primarily attributable to the addition of TRI Pointe, which had an average selling price of homes delivered of $750,000 and 174 deliveries with no comparable amounts in the prior year period.

- 33 -


Homebuilding Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)

Three Months Ended June 30,

2015

%

2014

%

Home sales

$

427,238

100.0

%

$

309,609

100.0

%

Cost of home sales

341,742

80.0

%

242,709

78.4

%

Homebuilding gross margin

85,496

20.0

%

66,900

21.6

%

Add:  interest in cost of home sales

7,640

1.8

%

5,340

1.7

%

Add:  impairments and lot option abandonments

882

0.2

%

(22

)

0.0

%

Adjusted homebuilding gross margin (1)

$

94,018

22.0

%

$

72,218

23.3

%

Homebuilding gross margin percentage

20.0

%

21.6

%

Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage (1)

22.0

%

23.3

%

(1)

Non-GAAP financial measure (as discussed below).

Our homebuilding gross margin percentage decreased to 20.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to 21.6% for the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to increases in land, labor and material costs outpacing home price appreciation. Excluding interest and impairment and lot option abandonments in cost of home sales, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage was 22.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 23.3% for the prior year period. The decrease in the adjusted homebuilding gross margin was consistent with the change in non-adjusted homebuilding gross margin.

Adjusted homebuilding gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that leverage and noncash charges have on homebuilding gross margin and permits investors to make better comparisons with our competitors, who adjust gross margins in a similar fashion. See the table above reconciling this non-GAAP financial measure to homebuilding gross margin, the nearest GAAP equivalent.

Land and Lot Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)

Three Months Ended June 30,

2015

%

2014

%

Land and lot sales

$

67,490

100.0

%

$

27,512

100.0

%

Cost of land and lot sales

11,564

17.1

%

24,765

90.0

%

Land and lot gross margin

$

55,926

82.9

%

$

2,747

10.0

%

Our land and lot gross margin percentage increased to 82.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to 10.0% for the prior year period. The increases in land and lot sales revenue and gross margin percentage were mainly due to the sale of a 15.72 acre employment center located in the Pacific Highlands Ranch community in the San Diego, California division of our Pardee Homes reporting segment.  The sale was completed in June of 2015 for $53 million in cash.  The transaction included significant gross margins due to the low land basis of the Pacific Highlands Ranch community which was acquired in 1981.

Sales and Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (dollars in thousands)

Three Months Ended

As a Percentage of

June 30,

Home Sales Revenue

2015

2014

2015

2014

Sales and marketing

$

25,634

$

23,798

6.0

%

7.7

%

General and administrative (G&A)

28,299

18,184

6.6

%

5.9

%

Total sales and marketing and G&A

$

53,933

$

41,982

12.6

%

13.6

%

Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased to 6.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from 7.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 mainly due to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes which has a lower sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue due to a strong sales absorption pace driving higher deliveries and higher average sales prices for homes delivered during the period.  The 7.6% increase in sales and marketing expense was related primarily to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes for the three month period ended June 30, 2015, representing $5.2 million of sales and marketing expenses, with no comparable amounts in the prior year period.  This amount was offset by decreases in all but one of the existing segments for the three months ending June 30, 2015 compared to the same prior year period.

- 34 -


General and administrative expense increased by $10.1 million to $28.3 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2015 from $18.2 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2014.   General and administrative expenses were 6.6% of home sales revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 5.9% of home sales revenue for the same period in the prior year.  The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of home sales revenue is due primarily to employee related costs with the addition of TRI Pointe Homes and the cost of being a standalone public company with no comparable amounts in the prior year period.

Total sales and marketing and G&A (“SG&A”) expense increased $11.9 million, or 28.3%, to $53.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from $42.0 million in the prior year period due primarily to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes in the current year, but improved to 12.6% of home sales revenue from 13.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges decreased to $498,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $520,000 in the same period in the prior year.  The decrease was mainly due to higher employee-related restructuring costs in 2014, largely related to retention, severance and related costs in connection with the Merger.

Interest

Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $15.1 million and $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The capitalized portion of interest incurred was $15.1 million and $4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The increase in interest incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year period was primarily attributable to an increase in our outstanding debt and higher interest rates as a result of the issuance of the Senior Notes in connection with the Merger as well as funding the overall growth of the Company.

Income Tax

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded a tax provision of $30.2 million based on an effective tax rate of 34.8%.  For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded a tax provision of $5.8 million based on an effective tax rate of 19.3%. The increase in our effective rate was due to a non-recurring tax benefit recorded during the second quarter 2014 related the establishment of a $5.8 million deferred tax asset for our tax over book basis in our shares of WRI stock.  This non-recurring tax benefit reduced our effective rate for the three months ended June 30, 2014 by 19.3%.  Without the non-recurring tax benefit our effective rate for the three months ended June 30, 2014 would have been 38.6%, which is comparable to our effective rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Net New Home Orders, Average Selling Communities and Monthly Absorption Rates by Segment

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Percentage Change

Net New

Average

Monthly

Net New

Average

Monthly

Net New

Average

Monthly

Home

Selling

Absorption

Home

Selling

Absorption

Home

Selling

Absorption

Orders

Communities

Rates

Orders

Communities

Rates

Orders

Communities

Rates

Maracay

345

17.4

3.3

225

16.0

2.3

53

%

9

%

41

%

Pardee

663

22.0

5.0

529

19.7

4.5

25

%

12

%

12

%

Quadrant

266

10.4

4.3

204

13.3

2.6

30

%

(22

)%

67

%

Trendmaker

256

26.4

1.6

309

23.1

2.2

(17

)%

14

%

(28

)%

TRI Pointe

701

26.3

4.4

N/A

N/A

N/A

Winchester

201

13.6

2.5

163

21.9

1.2

23

%

(38

)%

99

%

Total

2,432

116.1

3.5

1,430

94.0

2.5

70

%

24

%

38

%

- 35 -


Net new home orders for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased 70% to 2,432, compared to 1,430 during the prior year period.  Our overall absorption rate for t he six months ended June 30, 2015 was 20.9 per average selling community (3.5 monthly), compared to 15.2 per average selling community (2.5 monthly) during the prior year period.  The increase in net new home orders, average selling communities and monthly absorption rate was primarily due to the addition of TRI Pointe, which had 701 orders, 26.3 average selling communities and a monthly absorption rate of 4.4 per average selling community in the six month period ended June 30, 2015 with no comparable amoun ts in the prior year period.   In addition, the increase in net new home orders was due to an increase in our monthly absorption rate in all of our reporting segments, except for Trendmaker which experienced a decrease as a result of a slowdown in the prem ium housing market in Houston driven by inclement weather during the period and by the uncertainty around oil prices.

New Homes Delivered, Homes Sales Revenue and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Percentage Change

New

Home

Average

New

Home

Average

New

Home

Average

Homes

Sales

Sales

Homes

Sales

Sales

Homes

Sales

Sales

Delivered

Revenue

Price

Delivered

Revenue

Price

Delivered

Revenue

Price

Maracay

176

$

66,051

$

375

192

$

70,275

$

366

(8

)%

(6

)%

3

%

Pardee

410

195,889

478

381

186,302

489

8

%

5

%

(2

)%

Quadrant

180

79,025

439

145

56,269

388

24

%

40

%

13

%

Trendmaker

231

120,860

523

269

129,156

480

(14

)%

(6

)%

9

%

TRI Pointe

313

237,411

759

N/A

N/A

N/A

Winchester

156

102,267

656

149

109,509

735

5

%

(7

)%

(11

)%

Total

1,466

$

801,503

$

547

1,136

$

551,511

$

485

29

%

45

%

13

%

Home sales revenue increased $250.0 million, or 45%, to $801.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $551.5 million for the prior year period. The increase was comprised of: (i) $180.4 million related to an increase in average sales price of $62,000 per home to $547,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $485,000 in the prior year period; and (ii) $69.6 million due to a 29% increase in homes delivered to 1,466 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 1,136 in the prior year period. The increase in the average sales price and new home deliveries was primarily attributable to the addition of TRI Pointe with no comparable amounts in the prior year period. In addition, the average sales price of homes delivered increased at all but two of our reporting segments due to a change in product mix with a shift to a more move-up product in certain markets and price increases in certain markets.  The average sales price at Winchester and Pardee declined for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same prior year period primarily due to a change in product mix.

Homebuilding Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

%

2014

%

Home sales

$

801,503

100.0

%

$

551,511

100.0

%

Cost of home sales

641,648

80.1

%

433,977

78.7

%

Homebuilding gross margin

159,855

19.9

%

117,534

21.3

%

Add:  interest in cost of home sales

14,351

1.8

%

8,640

1.6

%

Add:  impairments and lot option abandonments

1,227

0.2

%

407

0.1

%

Adjusted homebuilding gross margin (1)

$

175,433

21.9

%

$

126,581

23.0

%

Homebuilding gross margin percentage

19.9

%

21.3

%

Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage (1)

21.9

%

23.0

%

(1)

Non-GAAP financial measure (as discussed below).

Our homebuilding gross margin percentage decreased to 19.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to 21.3% for the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to increases in land, labor and material costs outpacing home price appreciation. Excluding interest and impairment and lot option abandonments in cost of home sales, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage was 21.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 23.0% for the prior year period. The decrease in the adjusted homebuilding gross margin was consistent with the change in non-adjusted homebuilding gross margin.

- 36 -


Adjusted homebuilding gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that leverage and noncash charges have on homebuilding gross margin and permits investors to make better comparisons with our competitors, who adjust gross margins in a similar fashion. See the tabl e above reconciling this non-GAAP financial measure to homebuilding gross margin, the nearest GAAP equivalent.

Land and Lot Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)

Six Months Ended June 30,

2015

%

2014

%

Land and lot sales

$

69,490

100.0

%

$

30,899

100.0

%

Cost of land and lot sales

13,873

20.0

%

27,928

90.4

%

Land and lot gross margin

$

55,617

80.0

%

$

2,971

9.6

%

Our land and lot gross margin percentage increased to 80.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to 9.6% for the prior year period. The increases in land and lot sales revenue and gross margin percentage were mainly due to the sale of a 15.72 acre employment center located in the Pacific Highlands Ranch community in the San Diego, California division of our Pardee Homes reporting segment.  The sale was completed in June of 2015 for $53 million in cash.  The transaction included significant gross margins due to the low land basis of the Pacific Highlands Ranch community which was acquired in 1981.

Sales and Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (dollars in thousands)

Six Months Ended

As a Percentage of

June 30,

Home Sales Revenue

2015

2014

2015

2014

Sales and marketing

$

48,920

$

44,703

6.1

%

8.1

%

General and administrative (G&A)

56,478

36,189

7.0

%

6.6

%

Total sales and marketing and G&A

$

105,398

$

80,892

13.2

%

14.7

%

Sales and marketing expense decreased to 6.1% of home sales revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 8.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 mainly due to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes which has a lower sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue due to a strong sales absorption pace driving higher deliveries and higher average sales prices for homes delivered during the period.  The 9.4% increase in sales and marketing expense was related primarily to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes for the six month period ended June 30, 2015, representing $10.0 million of sales and marketing expenses, with no comparable amounts in the prior year period.  This amount was offset by decreases in each of the existing segments for the six months ending June 30, 2015 compared to the same prior year period.

General and administrative expense increased by $20.3 million to $56.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2015 from $36.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2014.   General and administrative expenses were 7.0% of home sales revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 6.6% of home sales revenue for the same period in the prior year.  The slight increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of home sales revenue is due primarily to employee related costs with the addition of TRI Pointe Homes and the cost of being a standalone public company with no comparable amounts in the prior year period.

Total sales and marketing and G&A (“SG&A”) expense increased $24.5 million, or 30.3%, to $105.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $80.9 million in the prior year period due primarily to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes in the current year, but improved to 13.2% of home sales revenue from 14.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges decreased to $720,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $2.2 million in the same period in the prior year.  The decrease was mainly due to higher employee-related restructuring costs in 2014 related to retention, severance and related costs in connection with the Merger.

- 37 -


Interest

Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $30.3 million and $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The capitalized portion of interest incurred was $30.3 million and $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The increase in interest incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year period was primarily attributable to an increase in our outstanding debt and higher interest rates as a result of the issuance of the Senior Notes in connection with the Merger.

Income Tax

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded a tax provision of $38.1 million based on an effective tax rate of 34.6%.  For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded a tax provision of $10.3 million based on an effective tax rate of 24.5%. The increase in our effective rate was due to a non-recurring tax benefit recorded during the second quarter 2014 related the establishment of a $5.8 million deferred tax asset for our tax over book basis in our shares of WRI stock.  This non-recurring tax benefit reduced our effective rate for the six months ended June 30, 2014 by 13.7%.  Without the non-recurring tax benefit our effective rate for the six months ended June 30, 2014 would have been 38.2% which is comparable to our effective rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Lots Owned or Controlled by Segment

Excluded from owned and controlled lots are those related to Note 8, Investments in Unconsolidated Entities .  The table below summarizes our lots owned or controlled by segment as of the dates presented:

Increase

June 30,

(Decrease)

2015

2014

Amount

%

Lots Owned

Maracay

1,485

1,289

196

15

%

Pardee

17,022

17,633

(611

)

(3

)%

Quadrant

995

1,025

(30

)

(3

)%

Trendmaker

837

673

164

24

%

TRI Pointe

2,920

2,920

N/A

Winchester

2,284

2,066

218

11

%

Total

25,543

22,686

2,857

13

%

Lots Controlled (1)

Maracay

327

783

(456

)

(58

)%

Pardee

173

680

(507

)

(75

)%

Quadrant

421

485

(64

)

(13

)%

Trendmaker

1,274

1,371

(97

)

(7

)%

TRI Pointe

735

735

N/A

Winchester

448

977

(529

)

(54

)%

Total

3,378

4,296

(918

)

(21

)%

Total Lots Owned or Controlled (1)

28,921

26,982

1,939

7

%

(1)

As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, lots controlled included lots that were under land option contracts or purchase contracts.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our principal uses of capital for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were operating expenses, land purchases, land development and home construction. We used funds generated by our operations and available borrowings to meet our short-term working capital requirements. We remain focused on generating positive margins in our homebuilding operations and acquiring desirable land positions in order to maintain a strong balance sheet and keep us poised for growth. As of June 30, 2015, we had $121.9 million of cash and cash equivalents. We believe we have sufficient cash and sources of financing for at least the next twelve months.

- 38 -


Our board of directors will consider a number of factors when evaluating our level of indebtedness and when making decisions regarding the incurrence of new indebtedness, i ncluding the purchase price of assets to be acquired with debt financing, the estimated market value of our assets and the ability of particular assets, and our company as a whole, to generate cash flow to cover the expected debt service. Our charter does not contain a limitation on the amount of debt we may incur and our board of directors may change our target debt levels at any time without the approval of our stockholders.

Assumption of Senior Notes

On the Closing Date, TRI Pointe assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (“2019 Notes”) and $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (“2024 Notes” and together with the 2019 Notes, the “Senior Notes”). The 2019 Notes were issued at 98.89% of their aggregate principal amount and the 2024 Notes were issued at 98.15% of their aggregate principal amount. The net proceeds of $861.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts, from the offering were deposited into two separate escrow accounts following the closing of the offering on June 13, 2014. Upon release of the escrowed funds on the Closing Date, and prior to the consummation of the Merger, WRECO paid $743.7 million in cash to the former direct parent entity of WRECO, which cash was retained by Weyerhaeuser and its subsidiaries (other than WRECO and its subsidiaries). The payment consisted of the $739 million Payment Amount (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) as well as $4.7 million in payment of all unpaid interest on the debt payable to Weyerhaeuser that accrued from November 3, 2013 to the Closing Date. The remaining $117.6 million of proceeds was retained by TRI Pointe and used for general corporate purposes.

The 2019 Notes and 2024 Notes mature on June 15, 2019 and June 15, 2024, respectively. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15.  As of June 30, 2015, no principal has been paid on the Senior Notes, and there was $22.1 million of capitalized debt financing costs related to the Senior Notes, included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet. These costs will amortize over the respective lives of the Senior Notes.

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

In May 2015, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) from $425 million to $550 million.  The Credit Facility matures on July 1, 2018, and contains a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit. The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility in the ordinary course of business to fund its operations, including its land development and homebuilding activities. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will be governed by, among other things, a borrowing base. The Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants relating to consolidated tangible net worth, leverage, and liquidity or interest coverage. Interest rates on borrowings will be based on either a daily Eurocurrency base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, in either case, plus a spread ranging from 1.45% to 2.20% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio.

As of June 30, 2015 the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was $399.4 million with an interest rate 2.14% per annum and $141.1 million of availability after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit.  At June 30, 2015 we had outstanding letters of credit of $9.5 million.  These letters of credit were issued to secure various financial obligations.  We believe it is not probable that any outstanding letters of credit will be drawn upon.

Seller Financed Loan

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $12.4 million outstanding related to seller financed loans to acquire lots for the construction of homes.  Principal and interest payments on these loans are due at various maturity dates, including at the time individual homes associated with the acquired land are delivered.  As of June 30, 2015, the seller financed loans will accrue interest at a weighted average rate of 6.97% per annum, with interest calculated on a daily basis. Any remaining unpaid balance on these loans is due in May 2016.

- 39 -


Covenant Compliance

Under our Credit Facility, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Covenant

Actual at

Requirement at

June 30,

June 30,

Financial Covenants

2015

2015

Consolidated Tangible Net Worth

$

1,366,475

$

903,350

(Not less than $875.9 million plus 50% of net income and

50% of the net proceeds from equity offerings after

March 31, 2015)

Leverage Test

47

%

<55%

(Not to exceed 55%)

Interest Coverage Test

4.72

>1.5

(Not less than 1.5:1.0)

As of June 30, 2015 we were in compliance with all of these financial covenants.

Leverage Ratios

We believe that our leverage ratios provide useful information to the users of our financial statements regarding our financial position and cash and debt management. The ratio of debt-to-capital and the ratio of net debt-to-capital are calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):

June 30,

December 31,

2015

2014

Unsecured revolving credit facility

$

399,392

$

260,000

Seller financed loans

12,390

14,677

Senior Notes

888,267

887,502

Total debt

1,300,049

1,162,179

Stockholders' equity

1,528,771

1,454,180

Total capital

$

2,828,820

$

2,616,359

Ratio of debt-to-capital (1)

46.0

%

44.4

%

Total debt

$

1,300,049

$

1,162,179

Less: Cash and cash equivalents

(121,907

)

(170,629

)

Net debt

1,178,142

991,550

Stockholders' equity

1,528,771

1,454,180

Total capital

$

2,706,913

$

2,445,730

Ratio of net debt-to-capital (2)

43.5

%

40.5

%

(1)

The ratio of debt-to-capital is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing debt by the sum of total debt plus equity.

(2)

The ratio of net debt-to-capital is a non-GAAP measure and is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing net debt (which is debt less cash and cash equivalents) by the sum of net debt plus equity. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is the ratio of debt-to-capital. We believe the ratio of net debt-to-capital is a relevant financial measure for investors to understand the leverage employed in our operations and as an indicator of our ability to obtain financing. See the table above reconciling this non-GAAP financial measure to the ratio of debt-to-capital.

- 40 -


Cash Flows—Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

For the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014, the comparison of cash flows is as follows:

·

Net cash used in operating activities increased by $281.7 million to $177.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $104.6 million provided from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The change was primarily comprised of (i) an increase in real estate inventories of $255.4 million in 2015 compared to an increase of $88.4 million in 2014 and (ii) a decrease in deferred income taxes of $9.5 million in 2015 compared to $120.8 million in 2014.  Other offsetting activity included changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses, receivables and net income.

·

Net cash used in investing activities was $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $4.0 million of cash used for the same prior year period. Cash used by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily related to investments in unconsolidated entities, while the same prior year period was primarily due to purchases of property and equipment.

·

Net cash provided by financing activities decreased to $130.2 million for the six months ending June 30, 2015 from $843.8 million for the same period in the prior year. The change was primarily a result of the Senior Notes issued in the second quarter of 2014.

As of June 30, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $121.9 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option contracts in order to procure lots for the construction of our homes.  We are subject to customary obligations associated with entering into contracts for the purchase of land and improved lots.  These purchase contracts typically require a cash deposit and the purchase of properties under these contracts is generally contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by the sellers, including obtaining applicable property and development entitlements.  We also utilize option contracts with land sellers as a method of acquiring land in staged takedowns, to help us manage the financial and market risk associated with land holdings, and to reduce the use of funds from our corporate financing sources.  Option contracts generally require a non-refundable deposit for the right to acquire lots over a specified period of time at pre-determined prices.  We generally have the right, at our discretion, to terminate our obligations under both purchase contracts and option contracts by forfeiting our cash deposit with no further financial responsibility to the land seller.  As of June 30, 2015, we had $44.3 million of cash deposits, the majority of which are non-refundable, pertaining to land option contracts and purchase contracts with an aggregate remaining purchase price of $392.3 million (net of deposits).

Our utilization of land option contracts is dependent on, among other things, the availability of land sellers willing to enter into option takedown arrangements, the availability of capital to finance the development of optioned lots, general housing market conditions, and local market dynamics.  Options may be more difficult to procure from land sellers in strong housing markets and are more prevalent in certain geographic regions.

As of June 30, 2015, we had $141.1 million of availability under our Credit Facility after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit.

Inflation

Our operations can be adversely impacted by inflation, primarily from higher land, financing, labor, material and construction costs.  In addition, inflation can lead to higher mortgage rates, which can significantly affect the affordability of mortgage financing to homebuyers.  While we attempt to pass on cost increases to customers through increased prices, when weak housing market conditions exist, we are often unable to offset cost increases with higher selling prices.

Seasonality

Historically, the homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results and capital requirements.  We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors.  Since it typically takes four to six months to construct a new home, we deliver more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home orders convert to home deliveries.  Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest in the second and third quarters, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occur during the second half of the year.  We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although it may be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry.

- 41 -


Description of Projects and Communities under Development

The following table presents project information relating to each of our markets as of June 30, 2015 and includes information on current projects under development where we are building and selling homes.

Maracay

Cumulative

Homes Delivered

Homes

Lots

for the Six

Year of

Total

Delivered as of

Owned as of

Backlog as of

Months Ended

Sales Price

First

Number of

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

Range

County, Project, City

Delivery (1)

Lots (2)

2015

2015 (3)

2015 (4)(5)

2015

(in thousands) (6)

Phoenix, Arizona

Town of Buckeye:

Verrado Tilden

2012

102

85

17

5

12

$239 - $304

Verrado Palisades

2015

63

7

56

7

7

$305 - $378

Verrado Victory

2015

98

2

96

15

2

$368 - $375

City of Chandler:

Artesian Ranch

2013

90

42

48

19

12

$331 - $387

Vaquero Ranch

2013

74

45

29

19

7

$298 - $373

Maracay at Layton Lakes

2015

47

47

11

$469 - $509

Sendera Place

2015

22

2

20

10

2

$260 - $307

Town of Gilbert:

Arch Crossing at Bridges of Gilbert

2014

67

34

33

18

13

$278 - $336

Trestle Place at Bridges of Gilbert

2014

73

44

29

13

16

$334 - $413

Artisan at Morrison Ranch

2016

105

105

$278 - $338

Marquis at Morrison Ranch

2016

66

66

$355 - $424

City of Goodyear:

Calderra at Palm Valley

2013

81

64

17

14

8

$275 - $352

Los Vientos at Palm Valley

2013

57

57

5

Closed

City of Mesa:

Kinetic Point at Eastmark

2013

80

43

37

16

14

$260 - $340

Lumiere Garden at Eastmark

2013

85

43

42

16

8

$313 - $383

Town of Peoria:

The Reserve at Plaza del Rio

2013

162

66

96

21

16

$211 - $253

Maracay at Northlands

2014

36

18

18

16

10

$314 - $395

Meadows - 5500's

2016

81

81

$355 - $437

Meadows - 6500's

2016

56

56

$417 - $486

Meadows - Oversized

2016

37

37

$417 - $486

Town of Queen Creek:

Montelena

2012

59

57

2

1

5

$375 - $447

The Preserve at Hastings Farms

2014

89

24

65

19

9

$280 - $364

Villagio

2013

135

72

63

21

12

$279 - $337

Phoenix, Arizona Total

1,765

705

1,060

241

158

Tucson, Arizona

Marana:

Tortolita Vistas

2014

37

14

23

10

5

$449 - $506

Oro Valley:

The Pinnacle - Center Pointe Vistoso

2016

70

70

$395 - $439

Summit (South) - Center Pointe Vistoso

2016

87

87

$349 - $382

The Cove - Center Pointe Vistoso

2016

83

83

$295 - $359

Desert Crest - Center Pointe Vistoso

2016

103

103

$232 - $285

Tucson:

Deseo at Sabino Canyon

2014

39

27

12

5

5

$419 - $505

Rancho del Cobre

2014

68

21

47

18

8

$399 - $470

Tucson, Arizona Total

487

62

425

33

18

Maracay Total

2,252

767

1,485

274

176

- 42 -


Pardee

Cumulative

Homes Delivered

Homes

Lots

for the Six

Year of

Total

Delivered as of

Owned as of

Backlog as of

Months Ended

Sales Price

First

Number of

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

Range

County, Project

Delivery (1)

Lots (2)

2015

2015 (3)

2015 (4)(5)

2015

(in thousands) (6)

California

San Diego County:

Alta Del Mar Homes

2013

117

49

68

31

11

$1,800 - $2,300

Sorrento Heights Prestige Collection

2014

20

20

2

$890 - $950

Watermark

2013

160

90

70

42

27

$1,155 - $1,300

Canterra

2015

89

89

7

$720 - $740

Casabella

2015

122

122

13

$825 - $855

Verana

2015

78

78

21

$975 - $1,040

Pacific Highlands Ranch Future

TBD

963

963

TBD

Olive Hill Estate

2015

37

37

$638 - $750

Castlerock

TBD

415

415

$473 - $708

Meadowood

TBD

844

844

$290 - $590

Sea View Terrace

2015

40

24

16

15

23

$308 - $340

Parkview Condos

2016

73

73

$345 - $370

Ocean View HillsFuture

TBD

1,020

1,020

TBD

South Otay Mesa

TBD

893

893

$185 - $530

Alta Del Mar Custom Lots

2013

29

26

3

$895 - $1,950

Los Angeles County:

LivingSmart at Fair Oaks Ranch

2011

124

124

1

$483 - $509

Golden Valley

TBD

498

498

$499 - $807

Skyline Ranch

TBD

1,260

1,260

$510 - $640

Ventura County:

LivingSmart at Moorpark Highlands, Moorpark

2013

133

117

16

12

33

$587 - $616

Riverside County:

Hillside

2012

182

182

2

$284 - $301

Meadow Ridge

2013

142

79

63

21

23

$340 - $440

Amberleaf

2014

131

45

86

29

24

$295 - $338

Meadow Glen

2014

140

63

77

21

21

$321 - $380

Summerfield

2015

85

5

80

37

5

$283 - $304

Canyon Hills Future

TBD

581

581

TBD

Christensen

2016

74

74

$338 - $437

LivingSmart Tournament Hills

2010

235

235

2

$261 - $334

Lakeside

2012

167

167

19

$260 - $282

Tournament Hills Future

TBD

268

268

TBD

LivingSmart Sundance

2013

152

136

16

6

26

$280 - $332

LivingSmart Estrella

2013

127

127

6

$214 - $237

Woodmont

2014

84

36

48

23

25

$307 - $371

Cielo

2015

92

21

71

43

21

$220 - $242

Northstar

2015

80

80

10

$270 - $310

Skycrest

2015

82

82

19

$311 - $350

Sundance Future

TBD

1,689

1,689

TBD

Banning

TBD

4,318

4,318

TBD

Sacramento County:

Natomas

TBD

120

120

TBD

San Joaquin County:

Bear Creek

TBD

1,252

1,252

TBD

California Total

16,916

1,546

15,370

350

271

Nevada

Clark County:

LivingSmart at Eldorado Ridge

2012

179

136

43

17

13

$255 - $306

LivingSmart at Eldorado Heights

2013

133

101

32

16

15

$302 - $392

LivingSmart Sandstone

2013

145

60

85

11

17

$216 - $246

Ridgeview

2015

4

4

$227 - $283

North Peak

2015

150

150

2

$284 - $337

Castle Rock

2015

150

150

1

$354 - $420

Eldorado Future

TBD

145

145

TBD

Horizon Terrace

2014

165

40

125

9

12

$400 - $455

Solano

2014

132

29

103

15

24

$289 - $312

Alterra

2014

106

15

91

5

15

$438 - $505

Bella Verdi

2015

106

106

9

$375 - $420

Milennial

TBD

2

2

TBD

Escala

2016

78

78

$545 - $591

POD 5-1 Future

TBD

215

215

TBD

Durango Ranch

2012

153

125

28

14

16

$460 - $536

Durango Trail

2014

77

52

25

15

11

$373 - $399

Meridian

2016

78

48

$455 - $530

LivingSmart at Providence

2012

106

106

1

$260 - $323

Encanto

2015

129

129

$406 - $468

Summerglen

2014

140

47

93

7

15

$292 - $298

Nevada Total

2,393

711

1,652

121

139

Pardee Total

19,309

2,257

17,022

471

410

- 43 -


Quadrant

Cumulative

Homes Delivered

Homes

Lots

for the Six

Year of

Total

Delivered as of

Owned as of

Backlog as of

Months Ended

Sales Price

First

Number of

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

Range

County, Project, City

Delivery (1)

Lots (2)

2015

2015 (3)

2015 (4)(5)

2015

(in thousands) (6)

Washington

Skagit County:

Skagit Highlands, Mt Vernon

2005

423

376

47

27

16

$229 - $322

Skagit Clearwater Court, Mt Vernon

2016

11

11

$287 - $307

Skagit Surplus Pod E, Mt Vernon

TBD

4

4

TBD

Snohomish County:

Kings Corner 1&2, Mill Creek

2014

116

64

52

29

20

$441 - $503

Filbert Glen, Bothell

2015

16

4

12

10

4

$650

King's Corner 3, Mill Creek

2016

29

29

$306 - $370

Evergreen Heights, Monroe

2016

71

71

$360 - $407

King County:

Woodland, Woodinville

2014

23

21

2

2

12

$571 - $576

Garrison Glen, Kent

2014

30

16

14

11

11

$430

Sonata Hill, Auburn

2014

71

17

54

19

10

$346 - $394

The Gardens at Eastlake, Sammamish

2015

8

8

$810 - $900

Heathers Ridge, Kirkland

2015

41

41

17

$800 - $920

Hedgewood, Redmond

2015

11

11

2

$800 - $980

Grasslawn Estates, Redmond

2015

4

4

$930 - $985

Vintner's Place, Kirkland

2016

35

35

$610 - $780

Hedgewood East, Redmond

2016

15

15

$730 - $810

Trailside, Redmond

2016

9

9

$686 - $735

Copperwood, Renton

2016

46

46

$520 - $626

Parkwood Terrace, Woodinville

2016

15

6

$629 - $694

Inglewood Landing, Sammamish

2017

21

17

$880 - $962

Heathers Ridge South, Redmond

2017

8

8

$590 - $890

Cedar Landing, North Bend

2017

111

13

$500 - $650

Palm Creek, Bothell

2017

41

36

$845 - $905

42nd Avenue Townhomes, Seattle

TBD

40

40

TBD

Pearl & Delores, Seattle

TBD

12

12

TBD

Pierce County:

Harbor Hill S-9, Gig Harbor

2014

40

24

16

11

13

$376 - $444

Harbor Hill S-8, Gig Harbor

2015

33

33

6

$376 - $444

Chambers Ridge, Tacoma

2014

24

9

15

7

8

$480 - $525

Tehaleh, Bonney Lake

2013

85

73

12

7

18

$345 - $356

The Enclave at Harbor Hill, Gig Harbor

2015

33

33

1

$540 - $590

Thurston County:

Campus Fairways, Lacey

2015

79

3

36

8

3

$365 - $425

Kitsap County:

McCormick Meadows, Poulsbo

2012

167

93

74

20

18

$276 - $353

Vinland Pointe, Poulsbo

2013

90

56

34

22

21

$334 - $357

Mountain Aire, Poulsbo

2016

145

145

$310 - $373

Closed Communities

N/A

26

N/A

Washington Total

1,907

756

995

199

180

Quadrant Total

1,907

756

995

199

180

- 44 -


Trendmaker

Cumulative

Homes Delivered

Homes

Lots

for the Six

Year of

Total

Delivered as of

Owned as of

Backlog as of

Months Ended

Sales Price

First

Number of

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

Range

County, Project, City

Delivery (1)

Lots (2)

2015

2015 (3)

2015 (4)(5)

2015

(in thousands) (6)

Texas

Brazoria County:

Sedona Lakes, Pearland

2014

20

8

12

3

8

$452 - $506

Southern Trails, Pearland

2014

36

23

13

8

11

$490 - $609

Fort Bend County:

Cross Creek Ranch 60', Fulshear

2013

54

44

10

4

12

$379 - $447

Cross Creek Ranch 65', Fulshear

2013

45

26

19

4

7

$432 - $488

Cross Creek Ranch 70', Fulshear

2013

73

37

36

4

3

$497 - $567

Cross Creek Ranch 80', Fulshear

2013

90

57

33

6

7

$541 - $662

Cross Creek Ranch 90', Fulshear

2013

34

22

12

1

7

$627 - $755

Villas at Cross Creek Ranch, Fulshear

2013

106

83

23

10

16

$454 - $555

Cinco Ranch, Katy

2012

100

81

19

5

12

$349 - $420

Harvest Green 75', Richmond

2015

1

1

$450 - $475

Sienna Plantation 80', Missouri City

2013

57

41

16

6

13

$542 - $650

Sienna Plantation 85', Missouri City

2015

1

1

$600

Lakes of Bella Terra, Richmond

2013

108

73

35

5

11

$465 - $569

Villas at Aliana, Richmond

2013

71

44

27

8

7

$437 - $503

Riverstone 55', Sugar Land

2013

80

51

29

6

4

$397 - $460

Riverstone 80', Sugar Land

2013

49

38

11

11

11

$559 - $710

Riverstone 100', Sugar Land

2015

5

5

$990 - $1,051

Riverstone Avanti at Avalon, Sugar Land

2015

1

$1,203 - $1,232

The Townhomes at Imperial Sugar, Sugar Land

2015

27

5

22

4

5

$384 - $530

Galveston County:

Harborwalk, Hitchcock

2014

13

4

9

4

2

$587 - $645

Harris County:

Fairfield, Cypress

2010

70

43

27

8

11

$474 - $573

Lakes of Fairhaven, Cypress

2008

263

235

28

20

16

$410 - $668

Towne Lake Living Views, Cypress

2013

52

21

31

5

7

$445 - $540

Calumet Townhomes, Houston

2015

4

1

3

2

1

$637

The Groves, Humble

2015

17

1

16

10

1

$454 - $505

Clear Lake, Houston

2015

185

185

24

$447 - $664

Montgomery County:

Barton Woods, Conroe

2013

75

43

32

5

8

$401 - $601

Villas at Oakhurst, Porter

2013

54

41

13

6

10

$375 - $458

Woodtrace, Woodtrace

2015

25

5

20

3

4

$485 - $536

Bender's Landing Estates, Spring

2014

105

18

87

1

16

$478 - $629

Creekside Park, The Woodlands

2015

6

6

Waller County:

Cane Island, Katy

2015

8

8

2

$560 - $647

Other:

Avanti Custom Homes

2007

123

99

24

29

11

$416 - $643

Texas Casual Cottages - Round Top

2010

85

68

17

27

7

$203 - $443

Texas Casual Cottages - Hill Country

2012

46

39

7

11

3

$217 - $498

Texas Total

2,088

1,251

837

243

231

Trendmaker Total

2,088

1,251

837

243

231

- 45 -


TRI Pointe

Cumulative

Homes Delivered

Homes

Lots

for the Six

Year of

Total

Delivered as of

Owned as of

Backlog as of

Months Ended

Sales Price

First

Number of

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

Range

County, Project, City

Delivery (1)

Lots (2)

2015

2015 (3)

2015 (4)(5)

2015

(in thousands) (6)

Southern California

Orange County:

Rancho Mission Viejo

2013

105

94

11

11

13

$669 - $715

Truewind, Huntington Beach

2014

49

21

28

22

12

$1,065 - $1,180

Arcadia, Irvine

2013

61

46

1

$1,189 - $1,420

Arcadia II, Irvine

2014

66

22

21

27

11

$1,189 - $1,271

Fairwind, Huntington Beach

2015

80

80

55

$822 - $1,012

Cariz, Irvine

2014

112

32

80

62

13

$507 - $617

Messina, Irvine

2014

59

25

11

9

17

$1,515 - $1,630

Aria-Rancho Mission Viejo

2016

87

87

$630 - $667

Auberine-Rancho Mission Viejo

2016

66

66

$1,005 - $1,115

San Diego County:

Altana, San Diego

2013

45

45

1

$630 - $728

Riverside County:

Topazridge, Riverside

2012

68

63

5

$464 - $530

Topazridge II, Riverside

2014

49

29

20

9

6

$459 - $515

Alegre, Temecula

2014

96

43

53

30

24

$287 - $323

Aldea, Temecula

2014

90

41

49

22

18

$262 - $298

Kite Ridge, Riverside

2014

87

7

80

3

7

$435 - $460

Sycamore Creek PA 7, Riverside

2015

87

87

$369 - $400

Terrassa Cluster, Corona

2015

94

94

$425 - $475

Terrassa, Corona

2015

52

52

$485 - $535

Los Angeles County:

Avenswood, Azusa

2013

66

66

12

$673 - $738

Woodson, Playa Vista

2014

66

62

4

4

22

$1,260 - $1,370

Grayson, Santa Clarita

2015

119

119

$517 - $550

San Bernardino County:

Sedona at Parkside, Ontario

2015

152

152

6

$355 - $390

Kensington at Park Place, Ontario

2015

67

3

64

2

3

$521 - $544

St. James at Park Place, Ontario

2015

57

6

51

7

6

$448 - $479

Ventura County:

The Westerlies, Oxnard

2015

116

116

$331 - $504

Southern California Total

1,996

605

1,330

269

166

Northern California

Contra Costa County:

Berkshire at Barrington, Brentwood

2014

89

32

57

27

15

$506 -$553

Hawthorne at Barrington, Brentwood

2014

105

29

76

26

10

$549 - $605

Marquette at Barrington, Brentwood

2015

90

90

14

$480 - $700

Wynstone at Barrington, Brentwood

2016

92

92

$498 - $525

Penrose at Barrington, Brentwood

2016

34

34

$498 - $515

Santa Clara County:

Avellino, Mountain View

2013

63

59

4

4

4

$1,205 - $1,498

Cobblestone, Milpitas

2015

32

32

17

$960 - $1,163

San Mateo County:

Canterbury, San Mateo

2014

76

53

23

23

27

$940 - $1,230

Solano County:

Redstone, Vacaville

2015

141

3

138

18

3

$455 - $527

San Joaquin County:

Ventana, Tracy

2015

93

6

87

10

6

$438 - $540

Sundance, Mountain House

2015

113

113

8

$550 - $615

Alameda County:

Cadence, Alameda Landing

2015

91

5

62

27

5

$1,057 - $1,234

Linear, Alameda Landing

2015

106

73

47

$685 - $915

Symmetry, Alameda Landing

2016

56

56

$775 - $875

Commercial, Alameda Landing

2

1

$620

Parasol, Fremont

2016

39

39

$605 - $815

Blackstone at the Cannery, Hayward

2016

105

105

$515 - $585

Blackstone at the Cannery, Hayward

2016

52

52

$620 - $670

Northern California Total

1,379

187

1,134

221

70

California Total

3,375

792

2,464

490

236

Colorado

Douglas County:

Terrain 4000 Series, Castle Rock

2013

149

82

67

26

26

$326 - $379

Terrain 3500 Series, Castle Rock

2015

67

11

56

28

11

$307 - $330

Jefferson County:

Leyden Rock 4000 Series, Arvada

2014

51

22

29

25

17

$385 - $441

Leyden Rock 5000 Series, Arvada

2015

67

7

60

30

7

$444 - $499

Candelas, Arvada

2015

76

3

73

5

3

$560 - $620

Denver County:

Platt Park North, Denver

2014

29

13

16

16

9

$611 - $615

Larimer County:

Centerra 5000 Series, Loveland

2015

150

4

40

11

4

$390 - $422

Arapahoe County:

Whispering Pines, Aurora

2015

115

115

$518 - $588

Colorado Total

704

142

456

141

77

TRI Pointe Total

4,079

934

2,920

631

313

- 46 -


Winchester

Cumulative

Homes Delivered

Homes

Lots

for the Six

Year of

Total

Delivered as of

Owned as of

Backlog as of

Months Ended

Sales Price

First

Number of

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

Range

County, Project, City

Delivery (1)

Lots (2)

2015

2015 (3)

2015 (4)(5)

2015

(in thousands) (6)

Maryland

Anne Arundel County:

Hawthornes Grant, Arnold

2014

15

15

3

Sold Out

Hawthornes Grant Lots For Sale

N/A

26

N/A

Watson's Glen, Millersville

2015

103

103

1

Closed

Frederick County:

Landsdale, Monrovia

Landsdale Village SFD

2015

222

222

13

$495 - $635

Landsdale Everson Townhomes

2015

100

100

$350 - $375

Landsdale TND Neo Everson SFD

2015

77

77

$465 - $595

Howard County:

Walnut Creek, Ellicott City

2014

16

12

4

7

3

$990 - $1,293

Montgomery County:

Cabin Branch, Clarksburg

Cabin Branch SFD

2014

359

32

327

14

16

$480 - $719

Cabin Branch Boulevard Townhomes

2016

61

61

TBD

Cabin Branch Everson Townhomes

2014

567

36

531

10

15

$375 - $390

Preserve at Stoney Spring-Lots for Sale

N/A

6

N/A

Preserve at Rock Creek, Rockville

2012

68

46

22

15

$685 - $964

Poplar Run, Silver Spring

Poplar Run Everson Townhomes

2013

136

71

65

10

2

$390 - $435

Poplar Run SFD

2010

297

188

109

15

23

$562 - $717

Poplar Run Lots for Sale

N/A

97

N/A

Potomac Highlands, Potomac

2016

23

23

TBD

Glenmont MetroCenter, Silver Spring

2016

89

89

TBD

Maryland Total

2,133

400

1,862

85

62

Virginia

Chesterfield County:

Founders Bridge, Midlothian

2014

3

2

1

1

2

Sold Out

Fairfax County:

Reserve at Waples Mill, Oakton

2013

28

20

8

3

3

$1,380 - $1,555

Stuart Mill & Timber Lake, Oakton

2014

19

3

16

2

1

$1,363 - $1,675

Henrico County:

Stable Hill, Glen Allen

2013

49

45

4

3

9

$517 - $620

Prince William County:

Villages of Piedmont, Haymarket

2015

168

3

165

5

3

$370 - $422

Loudoun County:

Brambleton, Ashburn

English Manor Townhomes

2014

28

14

14

7

7

$492 - $532

Glenmere at Brambleton SFD

2014

63

34

29

28

12

$590 - $723

Glenmere at Brambleton Townhomes

2014

73

50

23

9

22

$458 - $462

West Park at Brambleton

2013

45

44

1

1

9

$720 - $811

One Loudoun, Ashburn

2012

111

96

15

10

14

$675 - $710

Vistas at Lansdowne, Lansdowne

2015

120

3

117

13

3

$569 - $618

Willowsford Grant, Leesburg

2013

36

31

5

4

4

$925 - $930

Willowsford Greens, Aldie

2014

38

14

24

9

5

$750 - $840

Virginia Total

781

359

422

95

94

Winchester Total

2,914

759

2,284

180

156

Combined Company Total

32,549

6,724

25,543

1,998

1,466

(1)

Year of first delivery for future periods is based upon management’s estimates and is subject to change.

(2)

The number of homes to be built at completion is subject to change, and there can be no assurance that we will build these homes.

(3)

Owned lots as of June 30, 2015 include owned lots in backlog as of June 30, 2015.

(4)

Backlog consists of homes under sales contracts that had not yet been delivered, and there can be no assurance that delivery of sold homes will occur.

(5)

Of the total homes subject to pending sales contracts that have not been delivered as of June 30, 2015, 1,382 homes are under construction, 233 homes have completed construction, and 383 homes have not started construction.

(6)

Sales price range reflects base price only and excludes any lot premium, buyer incentives and buyer-selected options, which may vary from project to project. Sales prices for homes required to be sold pursuant to affordable housing requirements are excluded from sales price range. Sales prices reflect current pricing and might not be indicative of past or future pricing.

- 47 -


Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statement contained elsewhere in this report and the audited financial statements contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 describe the significant accounting policies essential to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Preparation of our financial statements requires estimate, judgements and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgements and assumptions that we have used are appropriate and correct based on information available at the time they were made. These estimates, judgements and assumptions can affect our reported assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the period presented. If there are material difference between these estimates, judgements and assumptions and actual facts, our financial statements may be affected.

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require our judgement in its application. There are areas in which our judgement in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result, but there are some areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would produce a materially different result. See the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

See Note 1 to the accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Related Party Transactions

See Note 18 to the accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt.  In addition, our operations are interest rate sensitive as higher mortgage interest rates could negatively affect housing demand.  We did not utilize swaps, forward or option contracts on interest rates or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments as of or during the three or six months ended June 30, 2015. We have not entered into and currently do not hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Many of the statements contained in this section are forward looking and should be read in conjunction with our disclosures under the heading “Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.”

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of reaching our desired disclosure control objectives.

During the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

- 48 -


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Various claims and actions that we consider normal to our business have been asserted and are pending against us. See Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies , of the condensed notes to the unaudited financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

The following supplements and updates the risk factors in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  If any of the risks discussed below or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K occur, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, in which case the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly and you could lose all or a part of your investment.  Some statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements in the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements.  Please refer to Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q entitled “Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.”

Risks Related to Our Business

Laws and regulations governing the residential mortgage and title insurance industries could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

We recently established a joint venture to provide mortgage related services to homebuyers and a wholly owned title agency.  The residential mortgage lending and title insurance industries are each heavily regulated.  Changes to existing laws or regulations or adoption of new laws or regulations could require us to incur significant compliance costs.  A material failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could result in the loss or suspension of required licenses or other approvals, the imposition of monetary penalties, and restitution awards or other relief.  In addition, we could be subject to individual or class action litigation alleging violations of these laws and regulations.  Any of these could result in substantial costs and we could incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on our business.  Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Deliveries of homes may be delayed as a result of lender compliance with a new rule governing the content and timing of mortgage loan disclosures to borrowers.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has adopted a new rule governing the content and timing of mortgage loan disclosures to borrowers.  This new rule, commonly known as TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures or TRID, is currently expected to take effect on October 1, 2015.  Lender compliance with TRID could result in delays in loan closings and the delivery of homes.

- 49 -


Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

2.1

Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., Weyerhaeuser Company, Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, and Topaz Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (filed Mar. 28, 2014))

2.2

Agreement and Plan of Merger to Form Holding Company, dated as of July 7, 2015, by and among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., TRI Pointe Group, Inc. and TPG Merger, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

4.1

Specimen Common Stock Certificate of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed Dec. July 7,, 2015))

4.2

Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2013, by and among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., BMG Homes, Inc., The Bauer Revocable Trust U/D/T Dated December 31, 2003, Grubbs Family Trust Dated June 22, 2012, The Mitchell Family Trust U/D/T Dated February 8, 2000, Douglas J. Bauer, Thomas J. Mitchell and Michael D. Grubbs. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (filed Jan. 9, 2014))

4.3

First Amendment to Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013, by and among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., BMG Homes, Inc., The Bauer Revocable Trust U/D/T Dated December 31, 2003, Grubbs Family Trust Dated June 22, 2012, The Mitchell Family Trust U/D/T Dated February 8, 2000, Douglas F. Bauer, Thomas J. Mitchell and Michael D. Grubbs (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed Nov. 4, 2013))

4.4

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2013, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., and certain TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. stockholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (filed Jan. 9, 2014))

4.5

Indenture, dated as of June 13, 2014, by and among Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (including form of 4.375% Senior Note due 2019) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 19, 2014))

4.6

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))

4.7

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))

4.8

Indenture, dated as of June 13, 2014, by and among Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (including form of 5.875% Senior Note due 2024) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 19, 2014))

4.9

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))

4.10

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))

- 50 -


4. 11

Second Amendment to Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Pointe Group, Inc., TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., BMG Homes, Inc., The Bauer Revocable Trust U/D/T Dated December 31, 2003, Grubbs Family Trust Dated June 22, 2012, The Mitchell Family Trust U/D/T Dated February 8, 2000, Douglas F. Bauer, Thomas J. Mitchell and Michael D. Grubbs (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

4. 12

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Point Group, Inc., TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

4. 13

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Point Group, Inc., TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

4.14

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Point Group, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))

31.1

Chief Executive Officer Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Chief Financial Officer Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Chief Executive Officer Section 906 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Chief Financial Officer Section 906 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101

The following materials from TRI Pointe Homes, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (v) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement.

- 51 -


SIGNAT URES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TRI Pointe Group, Inc.

By:

/s/ Douglas F. Bauer

Douglas F. Bauer

Chief Executive Officer

By:

/s/ Michael D. Grubbs

Michael D. Grubbs

Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 10, 2015

- 52 -

TABLE OF CONTENTS