LENDINGTREE, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________________________
FORM 10-K
__________________________________________________
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
ý
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
||
|
or
|
||
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from to
|
||
Commission File No. 001-34063
__________________________________________________
LendingTree, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
26-2414818
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
||
|
(704) 541-5351
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
||
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
||
|
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
The Nasdaq Stock Market
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
|
||
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer
ý
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Emerging growth company
o
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
o
No
ý
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of
June 30, 2017
was approximately
$1,231 million
. For the purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors and executive officers of the Registrant and the single stockholder who owns in excess of 20% of the voting common stock are assumed to be affiliates of the Registrant.
As of
February 21, 2018
, there were
12,243,752
shares of the Registrant's common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.
Documents Incorporated By Reference:
Portions of the Registrant's proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III herein.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page
|
||
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
(the "Annual Report") contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements related to our anticipated financial performance, business prospects and strategy; anticipated trends and prospects in the various industries in which our businesses operate; new products, services and related strategies; and other similar matters. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and assumptions about future events, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. The use of words such as "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "projects," "intends," "plans" and "believes," among others, generally identify forward-looking statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Factors currently known to management that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include those matters discussed below, including in Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Other unknown or unpredictable factors that could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations may arise from time to time. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking statements discussed in this report may not prove to be accurate. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which only reflect the views of LendingTree, Inc.'s management as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results or expectations, except as required by law.
ITEM 1.
Business
Our Company
LendingTree, Inc. ("LendingTree", the "Company", "we" or "us") operates what we believe to be the leading online loan marketplace for consumers seeking loans and other credit-based offerings. Our online marketplace provides consumers with access to product offerings from over 450 active lenders (which we refer to as "Network Lenders"), including mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, reverse mortgage loans, auto loans, credit cards, deposit accounts, personal loans, student loans, small business loans and other related offerings. In addition, we offer tools and resources, including free credit scores, that facilitate comparison shopping for these loans, deposits and other credit-based offerings. We seek to match consumers with multiple lenders, who can provide them with competing quotes for the product they are seeking. By providing consumers access to a broad array of credit-based offerings directly from multiple lenders, rather than just multiple quotes from the same lender or indirectly through intermediaries, we believe our marketplace is differentiated from other providers operating loan comparison-shopping marketplaces.
Our strategically designed and executed advertising and marketing campaigns (which we refer to as performance marketing) span a wide array of digital and traditional media acquisition channels and promote our LendingTree and other brands and product offerings. Our marketing efforts are designed to attract consumers to our websites and toll-free telephone numbers. Interested consumers complete inquiry forms, providing detailed information about themselves and the loans or other offerings they are seeking. We refer to such consumer inquiries as loan requests. We then match these loan requests with lenders in our marketplace that are seeking to serve these consumers' needs. We generate revenue from these lenders, generally at the time of transmitting a loan request to them, in the form of a match fee. In certain instances outside our mortgage business, we charge other kinds of fees, such as closed loan or closed sale fees. In addition to our primary loan request data referral business, LendingTree also matches consumers with lenders via website clicks and calls for which lenders pay either front-end or back-end fees.
We are continually working to improve the consumer experience. We have made investments in technologically-adept personnel and we use in-market real-time testing to improve our digital platforms. Additionally, we work with our lenders, including providing training and other resources, to improve the consumer experience throughout the loan process. Further, we have been building and improving our My LendingTree platform, which provides a relationship-based consumer experience, rather than just a transaction-based experience.
Evolution and Future Growth of Our Business
At its inception, our original business was to serve consumers seeking home mortgage loans by matching them with various lenders. We launched the LendingTree brand nationally in 1998 and, over the last nineteen years, we invested significantly in this brand to gain widespread consumer recognition.
More recently, we have actively sought to expand the suite of loan and other product offerings we provide to consumers, in order to both leverage the applicability of the LendingTree brand as well as more fully serve the needs of consumers and lenders. We believe that consumers with existing LendingTree-branded associations will be more likely to utilize our other service offerings than those of other providers whose brands consumers may not recognize.
In June 2014, we re-launched My LendingTree, a platform that offers a personalized loan comparison-shopping experience, by providing free credit scores and credit score analysis. This platform enables us to observe consumers' credit profiles and then identify and alert them to loan and other credit-based offerings on our marketplace that may be more favorable than the loans they have at a given point in time. This is designed to provide consumers with measurable savings opportunities over their lifetimes.
By expanding our portfolio of loans and other product offerings, we are growing and diversifying our business and sources of revenue. We intend to capitalize on our expertise in performance marketing, product development and technology, and to leverage the widespread recognition of the LendingTree brand to effect this strategy.
We believe the consumer and small business financial services industry is still the early stages of a fundamental shift to online product offerings, similar to the shift that started in retail and travel many years ago and is now well established. We believe that, like retail and travel, as consumers continue to move towards online shopping and transactions for financial services, suppliers will increasingly shift their product offerings and advertising budgets toward the online channel. We believe the strength of our brands and of our lender network place us in a strong position to continue to benefit from this market shift.
Recent Business Acquisitions
On September 19, 2017, we acquired certain assets of Snap Capital LLC, which does business under the name SnapCap. SnapCap is a tech-enabled online platform, which connects business owners with lenders offering small business loans, lines of credit and merchant cash advance products through a concierge-based sales approach. We believe that by combining SnapCap's high-touch, high-conversion sales approach with our brand and performance marketing expertise, we can derive substantial revenue synergies and accelerate growth in our small business offering.
On June 20, 2017, we acquired the membership interests of Camino Del Avion (Delaware), LLC, which does business under the name MagnifyMoney. MagnifyMoney is a leading consumer-facing media property that offers editorial content, expert commentary, tools and resources to help consumers compare financial products and make informed financial decisions. The MagnifyMoney team brings the expertise and infrastructure to expand content creation and distribution across all of our consumer facing brands, improving our presence and efficacy in acquisition channels such as search engine optimization.
On June 14, 2017, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Deposits Online, LLC, which does business under the name DepositAccounts.com (“DepositAccounts”). DepositAccounts is a leading consumer-facing media property in the depository industry and is one of the most comprehensive sources of depository deals and analysis on the Internet, covering all major deposit product categories through editorial content, programmatic rate tables and user-generated content. This acquisition represents our first offering to address the asset side of the consumer balance sheet.
On November 16, 2016, we acquired Iron Horse Holdings, LLC, which does business under the name CompareCards. CompareCards is a leading online source for side-by-side credit card comparison shopping. CompareCards provides consumers with one centralized location for pertinent credit card information needed to find the best card for their needs. CompareCards’ unique marketing platform and strong relationships with card issuers combined with LendingTree’s scale and organizational support have caused substantial growth in our credit card business. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 - Revenue."
These acquisitions continue our diversification strategy.
Products
We currently report our revenues in two product categories: (i) mortgage products and (ii) non-mortgage products. Non-mortgage products include credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans, reverse mortgage loans, auto loans, small business loans and student loans. Non-mortgage products also include deposit accounts, home improvement referrals and other credit products such as credit repair and debt settlement.
4
Mortgage and non-mortgage product revenue is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Mortgage products
|
$
|
275,910
|
|
$
|
219,991
|
|
165,272
|
|
|||
|
Non-mortgage products
|
341,826
|
|
164,411
|
|
88,944
|
|
|||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
617,736
|
|
$
|
384,402
|
|
$
|
254,216
|
|
||
LendingTree does not charge consumers or small businesses for the use of our services. Revenues from our mortgage products are mostly derived from upfront match fees paid by Network Lenders that receive a loan request, and in some cases upfront fees for clicks or call transfers. Because a given loan request form can be matched with more than one Network Lender, up to five match fees may be generated from a single consumer loan request form. Revenues from our non-mortgage products are derived from upfront match fees paid on delivery of a loan request, click or call and closed loan fees. For our credit card product, we send click traffic to issuers and are paid per card approval. For the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
, one Network Lender, Quicken Loans, accounted for
11%
,
15%
and
11%
of total revenue, respectively. Another Network Lender, loanDepot, LLC, accounted for
13%
and
12%
of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Mortgage Products
Our mortgage products category includes our purchase and refinance products.
We partner with lenders throughout the United States to provide full geographic lending coverage and to offer a complete suite of loan offerings on our marketplace. To participate on our marketplace, lenders are required to enter into contracts with us that state the terms and conditions for such participation, although these contracts generally may be terminated for convenience by either party. We perform certain due diligence procedures on prospective new lenders, including screening against a national anti-fraud database maintained by the Mortgage Asset Research Institute, which helps manage our risk exposure. The data is utilized to determine whether a lender and its principals are eligible to participate on our marketplace and have not been convicted of and/or penalized for fraudulent activity.
Consumers seeking mortgage loans through our loan marketplace can receive multiple conditional loan offers from participating lenders in response to a single loan request form. We refer to the process by which we match consumers and Network Lenders as the matching process. This matching process consists of the following steps:
|
(1)
|
Loan Request.
Consumers complete a single loan request form with information regarding the type of mortgage loan product they are seeking, loan preferences and other data. Consumers also consent to a soft inquiry regarding their credit.
|
|
(2)
|
Loan Request Form Matching and Transmission.
Our proprietary systems and technology match a given consumer's loan request form data, credit profile and geographic location against certain pre-established criteria of Network Lenders, which may be modified from time to time. Once a given loan request passes through the matching process, the loan request is automatically transmitted to up to five participating Network Lenders.
|
|
(3)
|
Lender Evaluation and Response.
Network Lenders that receive a loan request form evaluate the information contained in it to determine whether to make a conditional loan offer.
|
|
(4)
|
Communication of a Conditional Offer.
All matched Network Lenders and any conditional offers are presented to the consumer upon completion of the loan request form. Consumers can return to the site and view their offer(s) at any time by logging in to their My LendingTree profile. Additionally, matched lenders and offers are also sent to the email address associated with the consumer request.
|
We also offer consumers other mortgage products such as:
|
•
|
an alternative "short-form" matching process, which provides them with lender contact information rather than conditional offers from Network Lenders, and
|
|
•
|
a "rate table" loan marketplace, where consumers can enter their loan and credit profile and dynamically view real-time rates from lenders without entering their contact information.
|
Non-Mortgage Products
Lending Products
. Other lending products on our online marketplace include information, tools and access to multiple conditional loan offers for the following:
|
•
|
Auto, which includes our auto refinance and purchase loan products. Auto loans enable consumers to purchase new or used vehicles or refinance an existing loan secured by an automobile.
|
5
|
•
|
Credit cards, which include offerings from most major card issuers. As described above, during the fourth quarter of 2016, we purchased CompareCards, a leader in the online credit card comparison industry, enhancing this product.
|
|
•
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit, which enable home owners to borrow against the equity in their home, as measured by the difference between the market value of the home and any existing loans secured by the home. Home equity loans are one-time lump sum loans, whereas a home equity line of credit reflects a line of revolving credit where the borrower has flexibility to draw down and repay the line over time.
|
|
•
|
Personal loans, which are unsecured obligations generally carrying shorter terms and smaller loan amounts than home mortgages.
|
|
•
|
Reverse mortgage loans, which are a loan product available to qualifying homeowners age 62 or older.
|
|
•
|
Small business loans, which include a broad array of financing types, including but not limited to loans secured by working capital, equipment, real estate and other forms of financing, provided to small and medium-sized businesses. As described above, during the third quarter of 2017, we purchased SnapCap, an online platform with a concierge-based approach to connecting business owners with sources of credit, enhancing this product.
|
|
•
|
Student loans, which includes both new loans to finance an education and related expenses, as well as refinancing of existing loans. During the second quarter of 2016, we purchased SimpleTuition, a leading online marketing platform for student loans, enhancing this product.
|
We intend to continue adding new lending offerings for consumers, small businesses and lenders on our online marketplace, in order to grow and diversify our sources of revenue. We may develop such new offerings through internal product development efforts, strategic business relationships with third parties and/or acquisitions.
Other Products
. Other products also includes information, tools and access to the following:
|
•
|
Deposit accounts, through which consumers can access depository deals and analysis covering all major deposit product categories.
|
|
•
|
Credit repair, through which consumers can obtain assistance improving their credit profiles, in order to expand and improve loan and other financial product opportunities available to them.
|
|
•
|
Debt relief services, through which consumers can obtain assistance negotiating existing loans.
|
|
•
|
Home improvement services, through which consumers have the opportunity to research and find home improvement professional services.
|
|
•
|
Personal credit data, through which consumers can gain insights into how prospective lenders and other third parties view their credit profiles.
|
|
•
|
Real estate brokerage services, through which consumers are matched with local realtors who can assist them in their home purchase or sale efforts.
|
|
•
|
Various consumer insurance products, including home and automobile, through which consumers are matched with insurance lead aggregators to obtain insurance offers.
|
We refer to the various purchasers of leads from our other marketplaces as lead purchasers. We generate revenue from the deposit account product from a consumer clicking from our website through to a financial institution's website. We generate revenue through the insurance products and real estate brokerage services through match fees paid to us by insurance lead aggregators and real estate brokers participating in our online marketplace. We generate revenue from credit repair and debt relief services either through a fee for a customer referral to a service provider partner or through a fee at the time a consumer enrolls in a program with one of our partners. Revenue for home services is derived primarily through matching of leads to other home services lead aggregators.
Seasonality
Revenue in our lending business is subject to cyclical and seasonal trends. Home sales (and purchase mortgages) typically rise during the spring and summer months and decline during the fall and winter months, while refinancing and home equity activity is principally driven by mortgage interest rates as well as real estate values. However, in certain historical periods additional factors affecting the mortgage and real estate markets, such as the 2008-2009 financial crisis and ensuing recession have impacted customary seasonal trends.
We anticipate revenue in our newer products to be cyclical as well; however, we have limited historical data to predict the nature and magnitude of this cyclicality. Based on industry data, we anticipate that as our personal loan product matures we will
6
experience less consumer demand during the fourth and first quarters of each year. We also anticipate less consumer demand for credit cards in the fourth quarter of each year and we anticipate higher consumer demand for deposit accounts in the first quarter of each year. The majority of consumer demand for student loan products occurs in the third quarter coinciding with collegiate enrollment in late summer. Other factors affecting our businesses include macro factors such as credit availability in the market, interest rates, the strength of the economy and employment.
Competition
Our lending and other businesses compete with other online marketing companies, including online intermediaries that operate network-type arrangements. We also face competition from lenders that source consumer loan originations directly. These companies typically operate consumer-branded websites and attract consumers via online banner ads, keyword placement on search engines, direct mail, television ads, retail branches, realtors, brokers, radio and other sources, partnerships with affiliates and business development arrangements with others, including major online portals.
Product Development
We invest in the continued development of both new and existing products to enhance the experiences of consumers and lenders as they interact with us. We incurred product development costs of $24.2 million, $19.8 million and $16.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, all of which was company sponsored.
Financial Information About Segments and Geographic Areas
We have one reportable segment.
See
Note
18
—Segment Information to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
Additional information on our financial performance by geographic areas can be found in Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
Corporate History
LendingTree, Inc., is the parent of LendingTree, LLC and several companies owned by LendingTree, LLC. LendingTree, LLC, formerly known as LendingTree, Inc., was incorporated in the state of Delaware in June 1996 and commenced nationwide operations in July 1998. LendingTree, Inc., was acquired by IAC/InterActiveCorp ("IAC") in 2003 and converted to a Delaware limited liability company (LendingTree, LLC) in December 2004. LendingTree, LLC entered the mortgage origination business through the acquisition of Home Loan Center, Inc. in 2004. On August 20, 2008, LendingTree, LLC (along with its parent holding company Tree.com, Inc.) was spun off from IAC/InterActiveCorp into a separate publicly-traded company. We refer to the separation transaction as the "spin-off" in this report. Tree.com was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in April 2008 in anticipation of the spin-off. The Home Loan Center business was sold to Discover Financial Services in 2012. Since then, the Company has operated as a pure online marketplace and does not originate loans. Effective January 1, 2015, we changed our corporate name from Tree.com, Inc. to LendingTree, Inc.
Regulation and Legal Compliance
Our businesses market and provide services in heavily regulated industries through a number of different online and offline channels across the United States. As a result, we are subject to a variety of statutes, rules, regulations, policies and procedures in various jurisdictions in the United States, including:
|
•
|
Restrictions on the manner in which consumer loans are marketed and originated, including, but not limited to, the making of required consumer disclosures, such as the Federal Trade Commission's Mortgage Advertising Practices ("MAP") Rules, federal Truth-in-Lending Act, the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, the federal Fair Housing Act, the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), and similar state laws;
|
|
•
|
Restrictions imposed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd Frank Act") and current or future rules promulgated thereunder, including, but not limited to, limitations on fees charged by mortgage lenders, mortgage broker disclosures and rules promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB"), which was created under the Dodd-Frank Act;
|
|
•
|
Restrictions on the amount and nature of fees that may be charged to lenders and real estate professionals for providing or obtaining consumer loan requests, such as under RESPA;
|
7
|
•
|
Federal and State laws relating to the implementation of the Secure and Fair Enforcement of Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (the "SAFE Act") that require us to be licensed in all States and the District of Columbia (licensing requirements are applicable to both individuals and/or businesses engaged in the solicitation of or the brokering of residential mortgage loans and/or the brokering of real estate transactions);
|
|
•
|
State and federal restrictions on the marketing activities conducted by telephone, mail, email, mobile device or the internet, including the Telemarketing Sales Rule ("TSR"), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), state telemarketing laws, federal and state privacy laws, the CAN-SPAM Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act and their accompanying regulations and guidelines;
|
|
•
|
State laws requiring licensure for or otherwise imposing restrictions on the solicitation of or brokering of consumer loans which could affect us in our personal loan, automobile loan, student loan, credit card, or other non-mortgage consumer lending businesses;
|
|
•
|
Restrictions on the usage and storage of consumer credit information, such as those contained in the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and the federal Credit Repair Organization Act; and
|
|
•
|
State "Bird Dog" laws which restrict the amount and nature of fees, if any, that may be charged to consumers for automobile direct and indirect financing.
|
Intellectual Property
We believe that our intellectual property rights are vital to our success. To protect our intellectual property rights in our brand, technology, products, improvements and inventions, we rely on a combination of trademarks, trade secrets, patents and other laws, and contractual restrictions on disclosure, including confidentiality agreements with strategic partners, employees, consultants and other third parties. As new or improved proprietary technologies are developed or inventions are identified, we seek patent protection in the United States and abroad, as appropriate. We have three issued U.S. patents relating to our technologies. Two such patents relate to the method and network for coordinating a loan over the internet and will expire in 2018. The third patent, which relates to the system and method for collecting financial information over a global communications network, expires in 2032.
Many of our services are offered under proprietary trademarks and service marks. We generally apply to register or secure by contract our principal trademarks and service marks as they are developed and used. We have
45
trademarks and service marks registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. These registrations can typically be renewed at 10-year intervals.
We reserve and register domain names when and where we deem appropriate and we currently have over
1,000
registered domain names. We also have agreements with third parties that provide for the licensing of patented and proprietary technology used in our business.
From time to time, we may be subjected to legal proceedings and claims, or threatened legal proceedings or claims, including allegations of infringement of third-party trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties. In addition, the use of litigation and other dispute resolution processes, such as Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution, may be necessary for us to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2017
, we had
535
employees, of which approximately
523
are full-time and
12
are temporary or part-time. None of our employees are represented under collective bargaining agreements and we consider our relations with employees and independent contractors to be good.
Additional Information
Website and Public Filings
We maintain a corporate website at
www.lendingtree.com
and an investor relations website at
investors.lendingtree.com
. None of the information on our website is incorporated by reference in this report, or in any other filings with, or in any information furnished or submitted to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").
We make available, free of charge through our website, our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, our proxy statement for the annual shareholders' meeting and beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 as soon as reasonably practicable after we
8
file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. Our filings with the SEC are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's website at
www.sec.gov
, or at the SEC's public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our code of business conduct and ethics, which applies to all employees, including all executive officers and senior financial officers and directors, is posted on our website at
investors.lendingtree.com/corporate-governance.cfm
. This is our code of ethics pursuant to Item 406 of SEC Regulation S-K and the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Any amendments to or waivers of the code of business conduct and ethics that are of the type described in Item 406(b) and (d) of Regulation S-K will be disclosed on our website.
9
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this annual report and the information incorporated by reference herein. If any of the risks described below, or incorporated by reference into this annual report actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock may decline and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties we have described are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Certain statements below are forward-looking statements. See the information included under the heading "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information."
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Adverse conditions in the primary and secondary mortgage markets, as well as the general economy, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Constraints in the primary and secondary mortgage markets have in the past had, and may in the future have, an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Generally, increases in interest rates adversely affect the ability of our Network Lenders to close loans, and adverse economic trends limit the ability of our Network Lenders to offer home loans other than low-margin conforming loans. Our businesses may experience a decline in demand for their offerings due to decreased consumer demand as a result of the conditions described above, now or in the future. Conversely, during periods with decreased interest rates, Network Lenders have less incentive to use our marketplaces, or in the case of sudden increases in consumer demand, our Network Lenders may lack the ability to support sudden increases in volume.
We depend on relationships with Network Lenders and any adverse changes in these relationships could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends in significant part on the financial strength of lenders participating on our marketplaces and continuing relationships with such lenders. Network Lenders could, for any reason, experience financial difficulties and cease participating on our lender marketplace, fail to pay match and/or closing fees when due and/or drop the quality of their services to consumers. We could also have commercial or other disputes with such Network Lenders from time to time. The occurrence of one or more of these events with a significant number of Network Lenders could, alone or in combination, have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to meet certain metrics required by Network Lenders, then our business and financial results may be harmed.
We compete against other online marketing companies in significant part based on the quality and convertibility of the leads we generate. Network Lenders have expectations as to the quality and conversion rate of the leads that we generate. These expectations sometimes change over time. The leads that we supply to Network Lenders may not meet the expectations that Network Lenders have for such leads. Conversion rates for leads may be impacted by factors other than the lead quality, many of which are outside our control. Such factors include competition in lending markets and sales practices of Network Lenders. Failure to meet the expectations of Network Lenders in terms of quality and convertibility of leads may result in reduced fees paid to us by such Network Lenders, or in extreme cases, the loss of one or more Network Lenders, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to maintain brand recognition and attract and retain consumers in a cost-effective manner could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In order to attract visitors to our websites, convert these visitors into loan requests for our Network Lenders and lead purchasers and generate repeat visits from consumers, our businesses must promote and maintain their various brands. Brand promotion and maintenance requires the expenditure of considerable money and resources for online and offline advertising, marketing and related efforts, as well as the continued provision and introduction of high-quality products and services.
Brand recognition is a key differentiating factor among providers of online services. We believe that continuing to build and maintain the recognition of our various brands is critical to achieving increased demand for the services provided by our businesses. Accordingly, we have spent, and expect to continue to spend, significant amounts on, and devote significant resources to, branding, advertising and other marketing initiatives, which may not be successful or cost-effective. The failure of our businesses to maintain the recognition of their respective brands and attract and retain consumers in a cost-effective manner could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
10
Adverse publicity from legal proceedings against us or our businesses, including governmental proceedings and consumer class action litigation, or from the disclosure of information security breaches, could negatively impact our various brands, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the actions of our third-party marketing partners who engage in advertising on our behalf could negatively impact our various brands.
We depend on search engines, online advertising and other online sources to attract visitors to our websites, and if we are unable to attract these visitors and convert them into loan requests for our Network Lenders and lead purchasers in a cost-effective manner, our business and financial results may be harmed.
Our success depends on our ability to attract online consumers to our websites and convert them into customers in a cost-effective manner. We depend, in part, on search engines, online advertising and other online sources for our website traffic. We are included in search results as a result of both paid search listings, where we purchase specific search terms that result in the inclusion of our advertisement, and, separately, organic searches, that depend upon the searchable content on our sites. Search engines and other online sources revise their algorithms, and introduce new advertising products, from time to time in an attempt to optimize their search results.
If one or more of the search engines or other online sources on which we rely for website traffic were to modify its general methodology for how it displays our websites, resulting in fewer consumers clicking through to our websites, our business could suffer. If any free search engine traffic on which we rely begins charging fees for listing or placement, or if one or more of the search engines or other online sources on which we rely for purchased listings, modifies or terminates its relationship with us, our expenses could rise, we could lose customers, and traffic to our websites could decrease, all of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if our online advertisements are not able to reach certain consumers due to consumers’ use of ad-blocking software, our business could suffer.
We compete with a number of other online marketing companies, and we face the possibility of new competitors.
We currently compete with a number of other online marketing companies and we expect that competition will intensify. Some of these existing competitors may have more capital or complementary products or services than we do, and they may leverage their greater capital or diversification in a manner that adversely affects our competitive position, including by making strategic acquisitions. In addition, new competitors may enter the market and may be able to innovate and bring products and services to market faster, or anticipate and meet consumer or Network Lender demand before we do. Other newcomers, including major search engines and content aggregators, may be able to leverage their existing products and services to our disadvantage. We may be forced to expend significant resources to remain competitive with current and potential competitors. If any of our competitors are more successful than we are at attracting and retaining customers or Network Lenders, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our success depends, in part, on the integrity of our systems and infrastructures. System interruption and the lack of integration and redundancy in these systems and infrastructures may have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain the integrity of our systems and infrastructures, including websites, information and related systems, call centers and distribution and fulfillment facilities. System interruption and the lack of integration and redundancy in our information systems and infrastructures may materially and adversely affect our ability to operate websites, process and fulfill transactions, respond to customer inquiries and generally maintain cost-efficient operations. We may experience occasional system interruptions that make some or all systems or data unavailable or prevent our businesses from efficiently providing services or fulfilling orders. We also rely on affiliate and third-party computer systems, broadband and other communications systems and service providers in connection with the provision of services generally, as well as to facilitate, process and fulfill transactions. Any interruptions, outages or delays in our systems and infrastructures, our businesses, our affiliates and/or third parties, or deterioration in the performance of these systems and infrastructures, could impair the ability of our businesses to provide services, fulfill orders and/or process transactions. Fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, acts of war or terrorism, acts of God, unauthorized intrusions or computer viruses, and similar events or disruptions may damage or interrupt computer, broadband or other communications systems and infrastructures at any time. Any of these events could cause system interruption, delays and loss of critical data, and could prevent our businesses from providing services, fulfilling orders and/or processing transactions. While our businesses have backup systems for certain aspects of their operations, these systems are not fully redundant and disaster recovery planning is not sufficient for all eventualities. In addition, we may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate for losses from a major interruption. If any of these events were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are also in the process of transitioning our mortgage exchange to a new technology platform. The risks associated with this transition include, but are not limited to, operational implementation, downtimes, and diversion of management and technical
11
resources. If the transition to the new platform is more challenging or time consuming than expected, then our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Breaches or failures of our network security controls, the misappropriation or misuse of personal consumer information, the occurrence of fraudulent activity, or cybersecurity-related incidents may have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any penetration of network security or other misappropriation or misuse of personal consumer information maintained by us or our third-party marketing partners could cause interruptions in the operations of our businesses and subject us to increased costs, litigation and other liabilities. Claims could also be made against us or our third-party marketing partners for other misuse of personal information, such as for unauthorized purposes or identity theft, which could result in litigation and financial liabilities, as well as administrative action from governmental authorities. Real or perceived security breaches could also significantly damage our reputation with consumers and third parties with whom we do business.
We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against and remedy any potential or existing security breaches and their consequences. We also face risks associated with security breaches affecting third parties with whom we are affiliated or otherwise conduct business with online. Consumers are generally concerned with security and privacy of the Internet, and any publicized security problems affecting our businesses and/or those of third parties may discourage consumers from doing business with us, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are susceptible to fraudulent activity and cybersecurity-related incidents that may be committed against us, our Network Lenders or external service providers which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us, disclosure or misuse of our information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, fraudulent inducement, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts, any of which could be the result of a circumvention or failure of our internet-technology security controls. Information security breaches and cybersecurity-related incidents may include fraudulent or unauthorized access to systems used by us, Network Lenders, or external service providers, denial or degradation of service attacks, and malware or other cyber-attacks. We rely on a framework of internal controls designed to protect our information and assets, but despite our efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems, it is possible that we may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventative measures against all security breaches and fraudulent activity, especially because the methods of attack and deception change frequently and because such conduct can originate from a wide variety of sources, including third parties such as external service providers. As a result, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Litigation and indemnification of secondary market purchasers could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
In connection with the sale of loans to secondary market purchasers, Home Loan Center, Inc. ("HLC") may be liable for certain indemnification, repurchase and premium repayment obligations. For example, in connection with the sale of loans to secondary market purchasers, HLC made certain representations regarding related borrower credit information, loan documentation and collateral. To the extent that these representations were incorrect, HLC may be required to repurchase loans or indemnify secondary market purchasers for losses due to borrower defaults. HLC has made payments for these liabilities in the past and expects to make payments for these liabilities in the future.
We continue to be liable for these indemnification obligations, repurchase obligations and premium repayment obligations following the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of our LendingTree Loans business. We have in the past and intend to continue to negotiate in the future with secondary market purchasers to settle any existing and future contingent liabilities, but we cannot assure you we will be able to do so on terms acceptable to us, or at all. The occurrence of indemnification claims, repurchase obligations or premium repayments beyond our reserves for these contingencies, or our inability to settle with secondary market purchasers, may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Difficult market conditions have adversely affected the mortgage industry.
Declines in the housing market from 2006 through early 2012, as measured by the S&P/Case-Schiller 20-city composite home price index, with home price declines and increased foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but subsequently of other asset-backed securities, credit default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn, caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail.
12
Reflecting concern about the stability of the housing markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including to other financial institutions. This market disruption and tightening of credit led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence and increased market volatility. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and lack of confidence in the financial markets has had in the past and may have in the future, an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
While conditions in the housing markets have improved since 2013, the failure to sustain such improvements could have adverse effects on us and our Network Lenders. Further, our business could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other businesses in the financial services sector. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more of these entities, or the financial services industry generally, have in the past, and may in the future, lead to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to disruptions in the mortgage industry. Any such disruption could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A significant portion of our revenue growth in 2017 has been driven by our credit card product through our acquisition of CompareCards, which was completed in November 2016.
The CompareCards acquisition poses risks for our ongoing operations, including, among others:
|
•
|
adverse conditions in the economy may affect credit card issuers and their willingness to issue new credit;
|
|
•
|
credit losses among credit card issuers may increase beyond normal and budgeted levels which could cause a reduction in demand;
|
|
•
|
credit card issuers and other advertisers in the business verticals in which we or CompareCards operate may be unwilling to advertise on our or CompareCards's websites or mobile applications;
|
|
•
|
changes in application approval rates by credit card issuer customers;
|
|
•
|
increased competition and its effect on our or CompareCards's website traffic, click-through rates, advertising rates, revenue, margins, and market share;
|
|
•
|
ability to provide competitive service to credit card issuers and to consumers using CompareCards' and our online offerings and other platforms;
|
|
•
|
credit card issuers may determine that the online digital marketing channel is no longer a viable marketing platform for generating new credit card customers;
|
|
•
|
our ability to maintain brand recognition for both us and CompareCards and to effectively leverage the LendingTree brand with the CompareCards brand;
|
|
•
|
our ability to develop new products and services and enhance existing ones;
|
|
•
|
our ability to retain key employees of CompareCards;
|
|
•
|
costs and expenses associated with any undisclosed or potential liabilities;
|
|
•
|
that the business acquired in the acquisition may not continue to perform as well as anticipated; and
|
|
•
|
assumed liabilities associated with CompareCards' historical operations, including as a result of privacy regulations or data breaches.
|
If the CompareCards business is impacted by the risks described above, then our results of operations and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
A portion of our revenue growth in recent years has been driven by personal loan offerings. If lenders participating on our marketplace decide to reduce their offerings of personal loans or if such loans become unattractive to consumers because of higher interest rates demanded by lenders, then our results of operations and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
We re-launched our personal loan product in the third quarter of 2013. Revenue from personal loan offerings was responsible for a significant portion of the growth in the non-mortgage revenue over the last few years. Revenue from our personal loan product increased $21.8 million in 2017 from 2016 and $15.2 million in 2016 from 2015.
Personal loans are unsecured obligations and generally carry shorter terms and smaller loan amounts than mortgages. Because they are unsecured, they are generally riskier assets for lenders than mortgages or other secured loans. Consumer demand for unsecured loans offered on our marketplace is often for refinancing of higher interest credit card debt or for a lower interest alternative to credit card debt for a contemplated larger purchase that would otherwise be purchased with a credit card. Lenders
13
participating on our marketplace may reduce their willingness to make personal loans at more attractive interest rates than credit card debt and may for that reason, or for any other reason, reduce their demand for personal loan requests generated from our personal loan marketplace. Reasons that lenders might reduce their willingness to make personal loans at attractive interest rates may include regulatory changes, stricter institutional lending criteria, a lack of adequate funding sources or capital for loan originations, or increased borrower default levels, which may occur upon adverse changes in regional, national or global economic conditions. Additionally, lenders may tighten their underwriting standards, making it more difficult for consumers to qualify for personal loans. If lenders participating on our marketplace decide to reduce their offerings of personal loans, tighten their underwriting standards, or if personal loans become unattractive to consumers because of higher interest rates demanded by lenders, then our results of operations and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
Network Lenders affiliated with our marketplaces are not precluded from offering products and services outside of our marketplaces, or obtaining products and services from our competitors.
Because our businesses do not have exclusive relationships with Network Lenders, consumers may obtain loans from these third-party service providers without having to use our marketplaces. Network Lenders can offer loans directly to consumers through their own marketing campaigns or other traditional methods of distribution, such as referral arrangements, physical store-front operations or broker agreements. Network Lenders may also offer loans and services to prospective customers online directly, through one or more online competitors of our businesses, or both. If a significant number of consumers seek loans and services directly from Network Lenders or through our competitors as opposed to through our marketplaces, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Some of our non-mortgage products are new to the market and may fail to achieve or maintain customer acceptance and profitability.
We have launched new non-mortgage products over the last several years. We do not have as much experience with these new non-mortgage products as with the mortgage products and our other mature non-mortgage products. Accordingly, new non-mortgage products may be subject to greater risks than our more mature products.
The success of new products we may offer will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
•
|
Implementing, at an acceptable cost, product features offered by our competitors and/or expected by consumers and lenders;
|
|
•
|
Market acceptance by consumers and lenders;
|
|
•
|
Offerings by current and future competitors;
|
|
•
|
Our ability to attract and retain management and other skilled personnel for these businesses;
|
|
•
|
Our ability to collect amounts owed to us from third parties;
|
|
•
|
Our ability to develop successful and cost-effective marketing campaigns; and
|
|
•
|
Our ability to timely adjust marketing expenditures in relation to changes in demand for the underlying products and services offered by our lead purchasers.
|
Our results of operations may suffer if we fail to successfully anticipate and manage these issues associated with new products.
If we are unable to continually enhance our products and services and adapt them to technological changes and consumer and lender and/or lead purchaser needs, including the emergence of new computing devices and more sophisticated online services, we may lose market share and revenue and our business could suffer.
We need to anticipate, develop and introduce new products, services and applications on a timely and cost-effective basis that keep pace with technological developments and changing consumer and customer needs. For example, the number of individuals who access the internet through devices other than a personal computer, such as tablets, mobile telephones, voice assistants, televisions and set-top box devices has increased significantly and this trend is likely to continue. Because each manufacturer or distributor may establish unique technical standards for its devices, our websites may not be functional or viewable on these devices. Additionally, new devices and new platforms are continually being released. Consumers access many traditional web services on mobile devices through applications, or apps.
It is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in improving our websites' functionality with these alternative devices or developing apps for mobile platforms. If we fail to develop our websites or apps to respond to these or other technological developments and changing consumer and customer needs cost effectively, or if consumers and customers respond negatively to
14
changes, we may lose market share, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We improve our products and services in ways that forego short-term gains.
We are constantly striving to improve the user experience for our Network Lenders and consumers who use our websites and applications. Some of our changes may have the effect of reducing our short-term revenue or profitability if we believe that the benefits will ultimately improve our financial performance over the long-term. Any short-term reductions in revenue or profitability could be more severe than we anticipate or these decisions may not produce the long-term benefits that we expect, in which case our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or may be accused of infringing intellectual property rights of third parties.
We regard our intellectual property rights, including patents, service marks, trademarks and domain names, copyrights, trade secrets and similar intellectual property (as applicable), as critical to our success. Our businesses also rely heavily upon software codes, informational databases and other components that make up their products and services.
We rely on a combination of laws and contractual restrictions with employees, customers, suppliers, affiliates and others to establish and protect these proprietary rights. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use trade secrets or registered intellectual property without authorization which, if discovered, might require legal action to correct. In addition, third parties may independently and lawfully develop substantially similar intellectual properties.
We have generally registered and continue to apply to register, or secure by contract when appropriate, our principal trademarks and service marks as they are developed and used, and reserve and register domain names when and where we deem appropriate. We generally consider the protection of our trademarks to be important for purposes of brand maintenance and reputation. While we vigorously protect our trademarks, service marks and domain names, effective trademark protection may not be available or may not be sought in every country in which products and services are made available, and contractual disputes may affect the use of marks governed by private contract. Similarly, not every variation of a domain name may be available or be registered, even if available. Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights in a meaningful manner or challenges to related contractual rights could result in erosion of brand names and limit our ability to control marketing on or through the Internet using our various domain names or otherwise, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have been granted patents and from time to time we may have patent applications pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and various foreign patent authorities for various proprietary technologies and other inventions. The status of any patent involves complex legal and factual questions, and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. Accordingly, any patent application filed may not result in a patent being issued, or existing or future patents may not be adjudicated valid by a court or be afforded adequate protection against competitors with similar technology. In addition, third parties may create new products or methods that achieve similar results without infringing upon patents that we own.
Likewise, the issuance of a patent to us does not mean that our processes or inventions will be found not to infringe upon patents or other rights previously issued to third parties.
From time to time, in the ordinary course of business we are subjected to legal proceedings, claims and counterclaims, or threatened legal proceedings, claims or counterclaims, including allegations relating to misappropriation of trade secrets or infringement of the trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties. In addition, litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Patent litigation tends to be particularly protracted and expensive.
Our framework for managing risks may not be effective in mitigating our risk of loss.
Our risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and appropriately balance risk and return. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor and report the types of risk to which we are subject, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk, and strategic risk. We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure through a framework of policies, procedures and reporting requirements. There may be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that we have not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated. If our risk management framework does not effectively identify or mitigate our risks, we could suffer unexpected losses and could be materially and adversely affected.
The intended benefits of recent acquisitions may not be realized.
Our acquisitions pose risks for our ongoing operations, including, among others:
15
|
•
|
that senior management’s attention may be diverted from the management of daily operations to the integration of the businesses acquired in the acquisition;
|
|
•
|
we may be unable to retain key employees of businesses acquired;
|
|
•
|
costs and expenses associated with any undisclosed or potential liabilities;
|
|
•
|
that the businesses acquired in the acquisition may not perform as well as anticipated;
|
|
•
|
adverse conditions in the economy may affect the lenders or customers of the acquired businesses and their willingness to issue new credit;
|
|
•
|
advertisers in the business verticals in which we or the acquired businesses operate may be unwilling to advertise on our websites or mobile applications;
|
|
•
|
increased competition and its effect on our or the acquired businesses' website traffic, click-through rates, submitted consumer loan requests, advertising rates, revenue, margins, and market share;
|
|
•
|
our ability to maintain brand recognition for both us and the acquired businesses and to effectively leverage the LendingTree brand with the newly acquired brands;
|
|
•
|
our ability to develop new products and services and enhance existing ones;
|
|
•
|
assumed liabilities associated with the historical operations of the acquired businesses, including as a result of privacy regulations or data breaches.
|
As a result of the foregoing, our acquisitions may not be accretive to us in the near term or at all. Furthermore, if we fail to realize the intended benefits of the business acquired in the acquisition, the market price of our common stock could decline to the extent that the market price reflects an expectation of those benefits.
Other acquisitions or strategic investments that we pursue may not be successful and could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.
We may consider or undertake strategic acquisitions of, or material investments in, businesses, products or technologies. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition or investment candidates, or even if we do identify suitable candidates, they may be difficult to finance, expensive to fund and there is no guarantee that we can obtain any necessary regulatory approvals or complete such transactions on terms that are favorable to us. To the extent we pay the purchase price of any acquisition or investment in cash or through borrowings under our amended and restated revolving credit facility, it would reduce our cash balances and/or result in indebtedness we must service, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business and financial condition. If the purchase price is paid with our stock, it would be dilutive to our stockholders. In addition, we may assume liabilities associated with a business acquisition or investment, including unrecorded liabilities that are not discovered at the time of the transaction, and the repayment of those liabilities may have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition. There may also be litigation or other claims arising in connection with an acquisition itself.
We may not be able to successfully integrate the personnel, operations, businesses, products or technologies of an acquisition or investment. Integration may be particularly challenging if we enter into a line of business in which we have limited experience and the business operates in a difficult legal, regulatory or competitive environment. We may find that we do not have adequate operations or expertise to manage the new business. The integration of any acquisition or investment may divert management's time and resources from our core business, which could impair our relationships with our current employees, customers and strategic partners and disrupt our operations. Acquisitions and investments also may not perform to our expectations for various reasons, including the loss of key personnel or customers. If we fail to integrate acquisitions or investments or realize the expected benefits, we may lose the return on these acquisitions or investments or incur additional transaction costs and our business and financial condition may be harmed as a result.
If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
We have experienced rapid and significant growth in our headcount and operations, including as a result of acquisitions, which places substantial demand on management and our operational infrastructure. As we continue to grow, we must effectively integrate, develop and motivate a large number of new employees, while maintaining the beneficial aspects of our company culture. If we do not manage the growth of our business and operations effectively, the quality of our services and efficiency of our operations could suffer, which could harm our business and results of operations.
16
We rely on the performance of highly skilled personnel and if we are unable to attract, retain and motivate well-qualified employees, our business could be harmed.
We believe our success has depended, and continues to depend, on the efforts and talents of our management team and our highly skilled employees, including our software engineers, analysts, marketing professionals and sales staff. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled employees. The loss of any of our senior management or key employees could materially and adversely affect our ability to build on the efforts they have undertaken and to execute our business plan, and we may not be able to find adequate replacements. We cannot ensure that we will be able to retain the services of any members of our senior management or other key employees. If we do not succeed in attracting well-qualified employees or retaining and motivating existing employees, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
Network Lenders and lead purchasers on our marketplaces may not provide competitive levels of service to consumers, which could materially and adversely affect our brands and businesses and their ability to attract consumers.
The ability of our businesses to provide consumers with a high-quality experience depends, in part, on consumers receiving competitive levels of convenience, customer service, price and responsiveness from Network Lenders and lead purchasers participating on our other marketplaces with whom they are matched. If these providers do not provide consumers with competitive levels of convenience, customer service, price and responsiveness, the value of our various brands may be harmed, the ability of our businesses to attract consumers to our websites may be limited and the number of consumers matched through our marketplaces may decline, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A significant portion of our total revenue is derived from two Network Lenders, and our results from operations could be adversely affected and stockholder value harmed if we lose significant business from either of these Network Lenders.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, one Network Lender accounted for
11%
,
15%
and
11%
of total revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, another Network Lender accounted for
13%
and
12%
of total revenue. If either of these significant Network Lenders were to cease purchasing loan requests and we were unable to replace the associated demand, the loss could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the short term and potentially also the longer term. Also, if either Network Lender reduces its volume of loan requests for any reason, our business could be adversely affected.
Our current lack of geographic diversity exposes us to risk.
Our operations are geographically limited to and dependent upon the economic condition of the United States. As a result of this geographical concentration, we are more vulnerable to downturns or other conditions that affect the US economy. We may choose to expand our operations in order to increase our geographic diversity, and if we do, such expansion would place increased responsibilities on our management, divert resources from other operations and expose us to new risks of foreign operations.
We have incurred significant operating losses in the past and we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to be profitable over the long term.
We have incurred operating losses from continuing operations at times in our history, and although we were profitable in 2015, 2016 and 2017, we have an accumulated deficit of
$708.4 million
at
December 31, 2017
. If we fail to maintain or grow our revenue and manage our expenses, we may incur significant losses in the future and not be able to maintain profitability.
U.S. federal income tax reform could adversely affect us.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which legislation significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This tax legislation significantly reduced the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate and made other changes that could have a favorable impact on our overall U.S. federal tax liability in a given period. However, the tax legislation also included a number of provisions, including, but not limited to, the limitation or elimination of various deductions or credits (including for interest expense and for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code), the changing of the timing of the recognition of certain income and deductions or their character, and the limitation of asset basis under certain circumstances, that could significantly and adversely affect our U.S. federal income tax position. The legislation also made changes to the tax rules applicable to financial institutions and other entities with which we do business.
We revalued deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017 in light of the changes in the TCJA, and we recorded a net tax expense of $9.1 million during the fourth quarter of 2017. Our determination of valuation of our deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017 related to the TCJA is provisional and is subject to adjustment during a measurement period of up to one year following the December 2017 enactment of the TCJA, as provided by recent SEC guidance.
17
The impact of the TCJA and associated anticipated regulations on future years may be material to our consolidated financial statements. For example, we have historically relied extensively on performance-based compensation for our executive officers. The non-deductibility of future performance-based compensation to executive officers, and the expanded definition of “covered employees” whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m) may have material adverse effects on our effective tax rates. In addition, the limitations on the deductibility of interest may affect our anticipated tax benefits for the convertible note and hedge transactions described in Note 11—Debt to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. We continue to examine the impact this tax reform legislation may have on our business. The impact of this tax reform on holders of our common stock is uncertain and could be adverse. Similarly, changes in tax laws and regulations that impact our Network Lenders and lead purchasers or the economy generally may also impact our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to varying interpretations, and any significant failure to comply with applicable tax laws and regulations in all relevant jurisdictions could give rise to substantial penalties and liabilities. Any changes in enacted tax laws (such as the recent U.S. tax legislation), rules or regulatory or judicial interpretations; any adverse outcome in connection with tax audits in any jurisdiction; or any change in the pronouncements relating to accounting for income taxes could materially and adversely impact our effective tax rate, tax payments, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
As of December 31, 2017, we had pre-tax consolidated federal net operating losses (“NOLs”) of $5.8 million. The federal NOLs will expire in 2030. Our NOLs will be available to offset taxable income (until such NOLs are either used or expire) subject to the limitations found in Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383. In addition, we have state NOLs of approximately $190.4 million at December 31, 2017, that will expire at various times between 2018 and 2038. If we experience one or more ownership changes in the future as a result of future transactions in our stock, our ability to utilize NOLs could be limited. Our ability to use our NOLs was limited by the TCJA. See "U.S. federal income tax reform could adversely affect us."
We will experience costs and risks associated with a two-building office complex we purchased in Charlotte, North Carolina.
In December 2016, our subsidiary, Rexford Office Holdings, LLC, completed the purchase of two office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina for an aggregate purchase price of $23.5 million. We occupy a portion of this space and intend to relocate our corporate headquarters to these buildings at some point in the future. Additionally, we currently lease a portion of this space to other tenants. There are costs and risks associated with owning and leasing real estate that may apply to us in connection with owning and leasing these properties, including:
|
•
|
real estate taxes and maintenance costs;
|
|
•
|
financial difficulties or lease defaults by our tenants;
|
|
•
|
tenant turnover and loss of potential tenants to competing landlords;
|
|
•
|
actions by competing landlords that may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties;
|
|
•
|
costs of compliance with governmental rules and regulations, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, and zoning laws and potential liability thereunder;
|
|
•
|
changes in the cost or availability of adequate insurance, including coverage for mold and asbestos;
|
|
•
|
costs associated with environmental conditions or retained liabilities for such conditions;
|
|
•
|
less flexibility to move into alternative space or expand into alternative geographic locations than we might have if we leased our primary headquarters;
|
|
•
|
costs associated with remodeling the buildings for our corporate headquarters;
|
|
•
|
securing required governmental construction, zoning or other approvals and permits;
|
|
•
|
management of modifications in the design to the size and scope of the remodeling or other unforeseen engineering problems;
|
|
•
|
relocation costs associated with the movement of employees; and
|
|
•
|
lost employee productivity resulting from frequent work location changes necessitated by our growth.
|
Any of these costs and risks may negatively impact our earnings and cause our stock price to decline.
18
Our amended and restated revolving credit facility contains financial covenants and other restrictions on our actions, and it could therefore limit our operational flexibility or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition. Failure to comply with the terms of any such facility could impair our rights to the assets that have been pledged as collateral under the facility.
On November 21, 2017, our wholly-owned subsidiary LendingTree, LLC entered into an amended and restated $250.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility which matures on November 21, 2022 (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility can be used to finance working capital needs, capital expenditures, and general corporate purposes, including to finance permitted acquisitions. We do not currently have any borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Revolving Credit Facility contains a restrictive financial covenant, which limits the total consolidated debt to an EBITDA ratio. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including, subject to certain exceptions, restrictions on our ability to, among other things:
|
•
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
•
|
grant liens;
|
|
•
|
make loans and investments;
|
|
•
|
enter into mergers or make certain fundamental changes;
|
|
•
|
make certain restricted payments, including dividends, distributions, stock repurchases or redemptions;
|
|
•
|
sell assets;
|
|
•
|
enter into transactions with affiliates;
|
|
•
|
enter into restrictive transactions;
|
|
•
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
|
|
•
|
enter into hedging transactions; and
|
|
•
|
engage in certain other transactions without the prior consent of the lenders.
|
The Revolving Credit Facility requires LendingTree, LLC to pledge as collateral, subject to certain customary exclusions, substantially all of its assets, including 100% of its equity in all of its domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the voting equity, and 100% of the non-voting equity, in all of its material foreign subsidiaries (of which there are currently none). The obligations under this facility are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by LendingTree, Inc. and material domestic subsidiaries of LendingTree, LLC, which guaranties are secured by a pledge as collateral, subject to certain customary exclusions, of 100% of each such guarantor's assets, including 100% of each such guarantor’s equity in all of its domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the voting equity, and 100% of the non-voting equity, in all of its material foreign subsidiaries (of which there are currently none).
If an event of default occurs or if we otherwise fail to comply with any of the negative or affirmative covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility, the lenders may declare all of the obligations and indebtedness under such facility due and payable. In such a scenario, the lenders could exercise their lien on the pledged collateral, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. For additional information on the Revolving Credit Facility,
see
Note
11
—Debt, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
If our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), we review the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis as of October 1, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable, include a decline in stock price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates and slower growth rates in our industry or our customers' industries. We may be required to record a significant charge in our financial statements during a period in which any impairment of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets is determined, negatively impacting our results of operations.
Charges to earnings resulting from acquisitions may adversely affect our operating results.
Under GAAP, when we acquire businesses, we allocate the purchase price to tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired at their acquisition date fair values. Any residual purchase price is recorded as goodwill. We also estimate
19
the fair value of any contingent consideration. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are uncertain and involve significant judgments by management. After we complete an acquisition, the following factors could result in material charges and adversely affect our operating results and may adversely affect our cash flows:
|
•
|
costs incurred to combine the operations of companies we acquire, such as transitional employee expenses and employee retention or relocation expenses;
|
|
•
|
impairment of goodwill or intangible assets;
|
|
•
|
a reduction in the useful lives of intangible assets acquired;
|
|
•
|
impairment of long-lived assets;
|
|
•
|
identification of, or changes to, assumed contingent liabilities;
|
|
•
|
changes in the fair value of any contingent consideration;
|
|
•
|
charges to our operating results due to duplicative pre-merger activities;
|
|
•
|
charges to our operating results from expenses incurred to effect the acquisition; and
|
|
•
|
charges to our operating results due to the expensing of certain stock awards assumed in an acquisition.
|
Substantially all of these potential charges would be accounted for as expenses that would decrease our net income and earnings per share for the periods in which those costs are incurred. Charges to our operating results in any given period could differ substantially from other periods based on the timing and size of our acquisitions and the extent of acquisition accounting adjustments.
In particular, we acquired CompareCards in November 2016 for $80.7 million in cash at closing and contingent consideration payments of up to $22.5 million for each of 2017 and 2018. We assigned a fair value of the contingent consideration of $23.1 million. We will reassess this fair value quarterly, and increases or decreases based on the actual performance of CompareCards against the contingent consideration targets or other factors will cause decreases or increases, respectively, in our results of operations. During 2017, we incurred $21.2 million of contingent consideration expense due to the change in estimated fair value of the earnout payments.
Additionally, we have completed other acquisitions with potential future contingent consideration payments. We will reassess the fair value of our contingent consideration obligations on a quarterly basis and adjustments will be reflected in our results of operations. These quarterly adjustments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Risks Related to Compliance and Regulation
Failure to comply with past, existing or new laws, rules and regulations, or to obtain and maintain required licenses, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We market and provide services in heavily regulated industries through a number of different channels across the United States. As a result, our businesses have been and remain subject to a variety of statutes, rules, regulations, policies and procedures in various jurisdictions in the United States, which are subject to change at any time. The failure of our businesses to comply with past, existing or new laws, rules and regulations, or to obtain and maintain required licenses, could result in administrative fines and/or proceedings against us or our businesses by governmental agencies and/or litigation by consumers, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our brand.
Our businesses conduct marketing activities via the telephone, the mail and/or through online marketing channels, which general marketing activities are governed by numerous federal and state regulations, such as the Telemarketing Sales Rule, state telemarketing laws, federal and state privacy laws, the CAN-SPAM Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act and its accompanying regulations and guidelines, among others. Increased regulation by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has resulted in restrictions on telephone calls to residential and wireless telephone subscribers.
Additional federal, state and in some instances, local laws regulate secured and unsecured lending activities, which impacts the marketplace, lenders and consumers. These laws generally regulate the manner in which lending and lending-related activities are marketed or made available, including advertising and other consumer disclosures, payments for services and record keeping requirements; these laws include RESPA, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and various state laws. State laws often restrict the amount (and nature) of interest and fees that may be charged by a lender or mortgage broker, or otherwise regulate the manner in which lenders or mortgage brokers operate or advertise.
20
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of or inability to renew required licenses or registrations, loss of approval status, termination of contracts without compensation, administrative enforcement actions and fines, private lawsuits, including those styled as class actions, cease and desist orders and civil and criminal liability.
Most states require licenses to solicit, broker or make loans secured by residential mortgages and other consumer loans to residents of those states, as well as to operate real estate referral and brokerage services, and in many cases require the licensure or registration of individual employees engaged in aspects of these businesses. Further, as mandated by the federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (the "SAFE Act"), states adopted certain minimum standards for the licensing of individuals involved in mortgage lending or loan brokering. Compliance with these requirements may render it more difficult for us and our Network Lenders to operate or may raise our internal costs or the costs of our Network Lenders, which may be passed on to us through less favorable commercial arrangements. While our businesses have endeavored to comply with applicable requirements, the application of these requirements to persons operating online is not always clear. Moreover, any of the licenses or rights currently held by our businesses or our employees may be revoked prior to, or may not be renewed upon, their expiration. In addition, our businesses or our employees may not be granted new licenses or rights for which they may be required to apply from time to time in the future.
Likewise, states or municipalities may adopt statutes or regulations making it unattractive, impracticable or infeasible for our businesses to continue to conduct business in such jurisdictions. The withdrawal from any jurisdiction due to emerging legal requirements could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our businesses are also subject to various state, federal and/or local laws, rules and regulations that regulate the amount and nature of fees that may be charged for transactions and incentives, such as rebates, that may be offered to consumers by our businesses, as well as the manner in which these businesses may offer, advertise or promote transactions. For example, RESPA generally prohibits the payment or receipt of referral fees and fee shares or splits in connection with residential mortgage loan transactions, subject to certain exceptions. The applicability of referral fee and fee sharing prohibitions to lenders and real estate providers, including online networks, may have the effect of reducing the types and amounts of fees that may be charged or paid in connection with real estate-secured loan offerings or activities, including mortgage brokerage, lending and real estate brokerage services, or otherwise limiting our and our Network Lenders' ability to conduct marketing and referral activities.
Various federal, state and, in some instances, local, laws also prohibit unfair and deceptive sales practices. We have adopted appropriate policies and procedures to address these requirements (such as appropriate consumer disclosures and call scripting, call monitoring and other quality assurance and compliance measures), but it is not possible to ensure that all employees comply with our policies and procedures at all times.
Compliance with these laws, rules and regulations is a significant component of our internal costs, and new laws, rules and regulations are frequently proposed and adopted, requiring us to adopt new procedures and practices. Changes to existing laws, rules and regulations or changes to interpretation of existing laws, rules and regulations could result in further restriction of activities incidental to our business and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition.
Parties through which our businesses conduct business similarly may be subject to federal and state regulation. These parties typically act as independent contractors and not as agents in their solicitations and transactions with consumers. We cannot ensure that these entities will comply with applicable laws and regulations at all times. Failure on the part of a lender, website operator or other third party to comply with these laws or regulations could result in, among other things, claims of vicarious liability or a negative impact on our reputation and business.
Regulatory authorities and private plaintiffs may allege that we failed to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations where we believe we have complied. These allegations may relate to past conduct and/or past business operations, such as our discontinued mortgage origination operation (which was subject to various state and local laws, rules and regulations). Even allegations that our activities have not complied or do not comply with all applicable laws and regulations may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The alleged violation of such laws, rules or regulations may entitle an individual plaintiff to seek monetary damages, or may entitle an enforcing government agency to seek significant civil or criminal penalties, costs and attorneys' fees. Regardless of its merit, an allegation typically requires legal fee expenditures to defend against. We have in the past and may in the future decide to settle allegations of non-compliance with laws, rules and regulations when we determine that the cost of settlement is less than the cost and risk of continuing to defend against an allegation. Settlements may require us to pay monetary fines and may require us to adopt new procedures and practices, which may render it more difficult to operate or may raise our internal costs. The future occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In response to conditions in the U.S. financial markets and economy, as well as a heightened regulatory and Congressional focus on consumer lending, regulators have increased their scrutiny of the financial services industry, the result of which has included new regulations and guidance. We are unable to predict the long-term impact of this enhanced scrutiny. We are also
21
unable to predict whether any additional or similar changes to statutes or regulations, including the interpretation or implementation thereof, will occur in the future.
The collection, processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal data could give rise to liabilities as a result of governmental regulation, conflicting legal requirements or differing views of personal privacy rights.
In the processing of consumer transactions, our businesses receive, transmit and store a large volume of personally identifiable information and other user data. The collection, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of this information are governed by the privacy and data security policies maintained by us and our businesses. Moreover, there are federal, state and international laws regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of personally identifiable information and user data. Specifically, personally identifiable information is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in numerous jurisdictions around the world, the intent of which is to protect the privacy of personal information that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction. In the United States, regulations and interpretations concerning personally identifiable and data security promulgated by state and federal regulators, including the CFPB and FTC, could conflict or give rise to differing views of personal privacy rights. We could be materially and adversely affected if legislation or regulations are expanded to require changes in business practices or privacy policies, or if governing jurisdictions interpret or implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our failure, and/or the failure by the various third-party vendors and service providers with whom we do business, to comply with applicable privacy policies or federal, state or similar international laws and regulations or any compromise of security that results in the unauthorized release of personally identifiable information or other user data could damage the reputation of these businesses, discourage potential users from our products and services and/or result in fines and/or proceedings by governmental agencies and/or consumers, one or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in the regulation of the Internet could negatively affect our business.
Laws, rules and regulations governing Internet communications, advertising and e-commerce are dynamic and the extent of future government regulation is uncertain. Federal and state regulations govern various aspects of our online business, including intellectual property ownership and infringement, trade secrets, the distribution of electronic communications, marketing and advertising, user privacy and data security, search engines and Internet tracking technologies. Future taxation on the use of the Internet or e-commerce transactions could also be imposed. Existing or future regulation or taxation could hinder growth in or negatively impact the use of the Internet generally, including the viability of Internet e-commerce, which could reduce our revenue, increase our operating expenses and expose us to significant liabilities.
If Network Lenders fail to produce required documents for examination by, or other affiliated parties fail to make certain filings with, state regulators, we may be subject to fines, forfeitures and the revocation of required licenses.
Some of the states in which our businesses maintain licenses require them to collect various loan documents from Network Lenders and produce these documents for examination by state regulators. While Network Lenders are contractually obligated to provide these documents upon request, these measures may be insufficient. Failure to produce required documents for examination could result in fines, as well as the revocation of our licenses to operate in certain states, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Regulations promulgated by some states may impose compliance obligations on directors, executive officers, large customers and any person who acquires a certain percentage (for example, 10% or more) of the equity in a licensed entity, including requiring such persons to periodically file financial and other personal and business information with state regulators. If any such person refuses or fails to comply with these requirements, we may be unable to obtain certain licenses and existing licensing arrangements may be jeopardized. The inability to obtain, or the loss of, required licenses could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to an Investment in our Common Stock
Fluctuations in our operating results, quarter to quarter earnings and other factors may result in significant decreases in the price of our common stock.
The market price for our common stock has been volatile since our spin-off. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate, causing significant price variations to occur. As of December 31, 2017, since our spin-off, the price per share of our common stock has fluctuated from an intra-day low of $1.42 per share to an intra-day high of $355.80 per share. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the
22
factors that could negatively affect the price of our common stock or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common stock include:
|
•
|
variations in our quarterly operating and financial results;
|
|
•
|
variations in our projected operating and financial results;
|
|
•
|
failure to meet analysts' earnings estimates;
|
|
•
|
publication of research reports about us, our Network Lenders or our industry or the failure of securities analysts to cover our common shares or our industry;
|
|
•
|
additions or departures of key management personnel;
|
|
•
|
adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur or preferred or common shares we may issue in the future;
|
|
•
|
changes in our dividend payment policy or failure to execute our existing policy;
|
|
•
|
actions by shareholders;
|
|
•
|
changes in market valuations of other companies in our industry, including our customers and competitors;
|
|
•
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
•
|
speculation in the press or investment community, including short selling;
|
|
•
|
changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations affecting our industry or enforcement of these laws and regulations, or announcements relating to these matters;
|
|
•
|
changes in estimated fair value of contingent consideration related to acquisitions; and
|
|
•
|
changes in general economic or market conditions.
|
Recently, and in the past, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These market fluctuations could result in extreme volatility in the trading price of our common stock, which could cause a decline in the value of your investment in our common shares. In addition, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business or financial results, including in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if those events do not directly affect us. You should also be aware that price volatility may be greater if the public float and trading volume of our common stock are low. These factors may result in short-term or long-term negative pressure on the value of our common stock.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for internet marketplace operators and lead-generation companies depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about the industry and specific companies. If one or more analysts covering us currently or in the future fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decline, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline. If one or more recognized securities or industry analysts that cover our company or our industry in the future downgrades our common stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or industry, our stock price would likely decline.
Two holders of our common stock own a substantial portion of our outstanding common stock, which concentrates voting control and limits your ability to influence corporate matters.
As of
February 21, 2018
, Douglas Lebda, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned approximately 20% of our outstanding common stock. Additionally, Mr. Lebda holds restricted stock unit awards representing 9,896 shares and options to purchase a maximum of 748,805 shares that are not included in beneficial ownership because Mr. Lebda does not have the right to acquire them within 60 days. If these restricted stock units were to settle and these options were exercisable, they would represent additional beneficial ownership of approximately 4% of our outstanding common stock. As of
February 21, 2018
, Liberty Interactive Corporation beneficially owned approximately 26% of our outstanding common stock. Liberty Interactive also has the right to nominate 20% of the total number of directors serving on the board, rounded up. Two of our ten directors, Neal Dermer and Craig Troyer, were nominated by Liberty Interactive.
Therefore, for the foreseeable future, Mr. Lebda and Liberty Interactive will each have influence over our management and affairs and all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election or removal (with or without cause) of directors and approval of any significant corporate transaction, such as a merger or other sale of us or our assets. The interests of Mr. Lebda or Liberty Interactive may not necessarily align with the interests of our other stockholders. Mr. Lebda or Liberty Interactive could
23
elect to sell a significant interest in us and you may receive less than the then-current fair market value or the price you paid for your shares as a result of such transaction. This concentrated control could delay, defer or prevent a change of control, merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us that other stockholders may otherwise support. This concentrated control could also discourage a potential investor from acquiring our common stock and might harm the market price of our common stock.
Future sales of common stock by our existing stockholders may cause our stock price to fall.
The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales by our existing stockholders in the market, or the perception that these sales could occur. These sales might also make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
We may issue additional shares of our common stock in the future pursuant to current or future equity incentive plans, or in connection with current or future acquisitions or financings. If we were to raise capital in the future by selling shares of our common stock, or securities that are convertible into our common stock or issuing shares of our common stock in a business acquisition, their issuance would have a dilutive effect on the percentage ownership of our stockholders and, depending on the prices at which such shares or convertible securities are sold or issued, on their investment in our common stock and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on the market prices of our common stock.
Under a registration rights agreement with Liberty Interactive, Liberty Interactive and its permitted transferees are entitled to three demand registrations rights (and unlimited piggyback registration rights) in respect of the shares of our common stock received by Liberty Interactive as a result of the spin-off and other shares of our common stock acquired by Liberty Interactive or its affiliates. These holders will also be permitted to exercise their registration rights in connection with certain hedging transactions that they may enter into in respect of the registrable shares. The presence of additional shares of our common stock trading in the public market, as a result of the exercise of such registration rights, may have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, limit attempts by stockholders to replace or remove our management and affect the market price of our common stock.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as amended and restated, may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and/or amended and restated bylaws include provisions that:
|
•
|
Authorize our board of directors to issue, without further action by our stockholders, up to five million shares of undesignated preferred stock, sometimes referred to as "blank check preferred";
|
|
•
|
Prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
•
|
Provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office or by the sole remaining director;
|
|
•
|
Provide that only our board of directors may change the size of our board of directors;
|
|
•
|
Specify that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by or at the direction of our board of directors or by a person specifically designated with such authority by the board; and
|
|
•
|
Prohibit stockholders from taking action by written consent.
|
The provisions described above may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing our management. These provisions may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company, even if stockholders support such a change of control.
We do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
We have not declared or paid a cash dividend on our common stock during the five most recent fiscal years. We have no current intention to declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility contains certain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.
See
Note
11
—Debt, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The declaration, payment and amount of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be the sole source of gain for the foreseeable future for holders of our common stock.
24
Our financial results fluctuate as a result of seasonality, which may make it difficult to predict our future performance and may adversely affect our common stock price.
Our mortgage products business is historically subject to seasonal trends. These trends reflect the general patterns of the mortgage industry and housing sales, which typically peak in the spring and summer seasons. In recent periods, broader cyclical trends in interest rates, as well as the mortgage and real estate markets, have upset the customary seasonal trends. However, seasonal trends may resume and our quarterly operating results may fluctuate. Our non-mortgage products businesses have various seasonality trends which may create further uncertainty in our quarterly operating results.
See
Item 1. Business—Seasonality included elsewhere in this report for more information. Any of these seasonal trends, or the combination of them, may negatively impact the price of our common stock.
The conditional conversion feature of the Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
While the conditional conversion feature of the 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due June 1, 2022 (the “Notes”) is triggered, holders of Notes will be entitled to convert the Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. Because of the trading price of our common stock during the measurement period applicable to the quarter ended December 31, 2017, holders of the Notes became entitled to convert the Notes on January 1, 2018, and will continue to have such right until March 31, 2018. Convertibility for each quarter thereafter will be determined based on whether the last reported sales price of our common stock, for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price under the Notes on each applicable trading day. If so, then the Notes will be convertible during that calendar quarter. The Notes will also be convertible at any time during the five business day period immediately following any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Notes for each trading Day of such five trading day period is less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock on each such trading day and the conversion ratio under the Notes, as more fully described in the indenture governing the Notes, which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to this annual report.
If one or more holders elect to convert their Notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.
We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the Notes in cash or to repurchase the Notes upon a fundamental change, and our future debt may contain limitations on our ability to pay cash upon conversion or repurchase of the Notes.
Holders of the Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid special interest, if any. We may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of Notes surrendered therefore, or pay cash with respect to Notes being converted if we elect not to issue shares, which could harm our reputation and affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our hedge and warrant transactions may affect the value of the Notes and our common stock.
In connection with the pricing of the Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions with certain counterparties. The hedge transactions are generally expected to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes and/or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted Notes, as the case may be. We also entered into warrant transactions with such counterparties. However, the warrant transactions could separately have a dilutive effect to the extent that the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants. The initial strike price of the warrants is $266.39.
In connection with establishing their initial hedge of the hedge and warrant transactions, the counterparties or their respective affiliates may have purchased shares of our common stock and/or entered into various derivative transactions with respect to our common stock concurrently with or shortly after the pricing of the Notes. In addition, the counterparties or their respective affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchasing or selling our common stock or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the Notes (and are likely to do so during any observation period related to a conversion of Notes or following any repurchase of Notes by us on any fundamental repurchase date or otherwise). This activity could cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our common stock or the Notes.
25
The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash, such as the Notes, could have a material effect on our reported financial results.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which has subsequently been codified as ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, which we refer to as ASC 470-20. Under ASC 470-20, an entity must separately account for the liability and equity components of the convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. The effect of ASC 470-20 on the accounting for the Notes is that the equity component is required to be included in the additional paid-in capital section of stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet, and the value of the equity component would be treated as debt discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Notes. As a result, we will be required to record a greater amount of non-cash interest expense in current periods presented as a result of the amortization of the discounted carrying value of the Notes to their face amount over the term of the Notes. We will report lower net income in our financial results because ASC 470-20 will require interest to include the current period’s amortization of the debt discount, which could adversely affect our reported or future financial results, the trading price of our common stock and the trading price of the Notes.
We may still incur substantially more debt in the future or take other actions which would intensify the risks associated with our debt.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional debt in the future, subject to the restrictions contained in our debt instruments, some of which may be secured debt. We are not restricted under the terms of the indenture governing the Notes from incurring additional debt, securing existing or future debt, recapitalizing our debt or taking a number of other actions that are not limited by the terms of the indenture governing the Notes that could have the effect of diminishing our ability to make payments on the Notes when due. Our existing credit facility restricts our ability to incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, but if the facility matures or is repaid, we may not be subject to such restrictions under the terms of any subsequent indebtedness.
ITEM 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
ITEM 2.
Properties
Our principal executive offices are currently located in approximately 37,800 square feet of office space in Charlotte, North Carolina under a lease that expires in December 2020. In addition, we have offices located in approximately 9,400 square feet of office space in Burlingame, California under a lease that expires in March 2020 and approximately 13,000 square feet of additional office space in Charlotte, North Carolina under a lease that expires in August 2018. As a result of our acquisitions during 2017 and 2016, we also operate offices in: Charleston, South Carolina; New York City, New York; and Northbrook, Illinois.
In December 2016, we completed the acquisition of two office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina, with approximately 64,000 and 73,000 square feet of office space, respectively. We partially occupy one building for certain call center operations and intend to utilize one or both buildings in the future as our principal executive offices and any unused space will continue to be occupied by tenants.
ITEM 3.
Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are party to litigation involving property, contract, intellectual property and a variety of other claims. The amounts that may be recovered in such matters may be subject to insurance coverage.
See
Note
13
—
Contingencies in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a discussion of our current and recently settled litigation.
ITEM 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
26
ITEM 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
General Market Information, Holders and Dividends
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol "TREE". The table below sets forth, for the calendar periods indicated, the high and low intraday sales prices per share for LendingTree common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The stock price information is based on published financial sources.
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$
|
130.20
|
|
$
|
96.20
|
|
||
|
Second Quarter
|
184.05
|
|
116.70
|
|
||||
|
Third Quarter
|
255.00
|
|
166.85
|
|
||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
355.80
|
|
217.70
|
|
||||
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$
|
100.19
|
|
$
|
52.11
|
|
||
|
Second Quarter
|
106.82
|
|
64.07
|
|
||||
|
Third Quarter
|
112.00
|
|
87.50
|
|
||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
110.10
|
|
75.05
|
|
||||
As of
February 21, 2018
, there were approximately
710
holders of record of our common stock and the closing price of the common stock was
$371.25
.
We have not declared a cash dividend on our common stock during the five most recent fiscal years. We have no current intention to declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The declaration, payment and amount of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors. The amended and restated revolving credit facility we entered into on November 21, 2017 contains contractual restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.
See
Note
11
—Debt, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional information.
Performance Graph
The performance graph shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Set forth below is a line graph, for the period from December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2017, comparing the cumulative total stockholder return of $100 invested (assuming that all dividends were reinvested) in (1) our common stock, (2) the cumulative return of all companies listed on the Nasdaq Composite Index and (3) the cumulative total return of the Research Development Group ("RDG") Internet index. Returns over the indicated periods should not be considered indicative of future stock prices or stockholder returns.
27
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, we did not issue or sell any shares of our common stock or other equity securities in transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In each of January 2010, May 2014, January 2016, February 2016 and February 2018, the board of directors authorized and we announced a stock repurchase program which allowed for the repurchase of up to $10.0 million, $10.0 million, $50.0 million, $40.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively, of our common stock. Under this program, we can repurchase stock in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions. We have used available cash to finance these repurchases. We will determine the timing and amount of any additional repurchases based on our evaluation of market conditions, applicable SEC guidelines and regulations, and other factors. This program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at the discretion of our board of directors. During the quarter ended
December 31, 2017
,
33,240
shares of common stock were repurchased under the stock repurchase program. As of
February 21, 2018
, approximately $116.7 million is authorized for future share repurchases.
Additionally, the LendingTree Fifth Amended and Restated 2008 Stock and Award Incentive Plan and the LendingTree 2017 Inducement Grant Plan allow employees to forfeit shares of our common stock to satisfy federal and state withholding obligations upon the exercise of stock options, the settlement of restricted stock unit awards and the vesting of restricted stock awards granted to those individuals under the plans. During the quarter ended
December 31, 2017
,
2,233
shares were purchased related to these obligations under the LendingTree Fifth Amended and Restated 2008 Stock and Award Incentive Plan and no shares have yet been purchased related to these obligations under the LendingTree 2017 Inducement Grant Plan. The withholding of those shares does not affect the dollar amount or number of shares that may be purchased under the stock repurchase program described above.
28
The following table provides information about the Company's purchases of equity securities during the quarter ended
December 31, 2017
.
|
Period
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
(1)
|
Average Price
Paid per Share
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
(2)
|
Maximum
Number/Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares
that May Yet be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
|
10/1/17 - 10/31/17
|
206
|
|
$
|
228.35
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
38,747
|
|
||||
|
11/1/17 - 11/30/17
|
1,104
|
|
$
|
264.58
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
38,747
|
|
||||
|
12/1/17 - 12/31/17
|
34,163
|
|
$
|
330.47
|
|
33,240
|
|
$
|
27,749
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
35,473
|
|
$
|
327.82
|
|
33,240
|
|
$
|
27,749
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
During October 2017, November 2017 and December 2017,
206
shares,
1,104
shares and
923
shares, respectively (totaling
2,233
shares), were purchased to satisfy federal and state withholding obligations of our employees upon the settlement of restricted stock unit awards and the vesting of restricted stock awards, all in accordance with our Fifth Amended and Restated 2008 Stock and Award Incentive Plan, as described above.
|
|
(2)
|
See the narrative disclosure above the table for further description of our publicly announced stock repurchase program.
|
29
ITEM 6.
Selected Financial Data
The summary financial data presented below represents portions of our consolidated financial statements and are not complete. The following financial information should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included elsewhere in this annual report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future performance or results of operations.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Results of Operations:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
(1)
|
$
|
617,736
|
|
$
|
384,402
|
|
$
|
254,216
|
|
$
|
167,350
|
|
$
|
139,240
|
|
||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
(2)
|
19,418
|
|
31,208
|
|
51,316
|
|
(487
|
)
|
(673
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
(3)
|
(3,840
|
)
|
(3,714
|
)
|
(3,269
|
)
|
9,849
|
|
4,620
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
$
|
15,578
|
|
$
|
27,494
|
|
$
|
48,047
|
|
$
|
9,362
|
|
$
|
3,947
|
|
||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
11,945
|
|
11,812
|
|
11,516
|
|
11,188
|
|
11,035
|
|
|||||||||
|
Diluted
|
13,682
|
|
12,773
|
|
12,541
|
|
11,188
|
|
11,035
|
|
|||||||||
|
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
$
|
2.44
|
|
$
|
4.09
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
||||
|
(Loss) income per share from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
||||
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
||||
|
Cash dividend per share
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Financial Position:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
(4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
|
$
|
368,550
|
|
$
|
91,131
|
|
$
|
206,975
|
|
$
|
86,212
|
|
$
|
91,667
|
|
||||
|
Total assets
(4) (7)
|
$
|
693,459
|
|
$
|
323,427
|
|
$
|
295,781
|
|
$
|
139,891
|
|
$
|
152,644
|
|
||||
|
Total long-term liabilities
(5) (7) (8)
|
$
|
251,069
|
|
$
|
25,285
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
$
|
4,889
|
|
$
|
5,437
|
|
||||
|
Total shareholders' equity
(4) (7)
|
$
|
294,874
|
|
$
|
231,435
|
|
$
|
241,142
|
|
$
|
96,366
|
|
$
|
87,008
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
See
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015—Revenue for a discussion of revenue.
|
|
(2)
|
In 2015, we released the majority of the valuation allowance, which, along with federal and state income taxes, resulted in a total tax benefit of $23.0 million.
See
Note
10
—Income Taxes in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional information.
|
|
(3)
|
See
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015—Discontinued Operations for a discussion of discontinued operations.
|
|
(4)
|
In November 2015, we completed an equity offering of 852,500 shares of our common stock, receiving net proceeds of $91.5 million.
|
|
(5)
|
In November 2016, we acquired CompareCards for $80.7 million in cash at closing and contingent consideration payments of up to $22.5 million for each of 2017 and 2018. Total long-term liabilities at the end of 2016 included the fair value of the contingent consideration of $23.1 million. This fair value is reassessed quarterly. During 2017, we recorded $21.2
|
30
million of contingent consideration expense due to the change in estimated fair value of the earnout payments.
See
Note
6
—Business Acquisitions in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional information.
|
(6)
|
In December 2016, we acquired two office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina for $23.5 million in cash.
See
Note
4
—Property and Equipment in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional information.
|
|
(7)
|
In May 2017, we issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due June 1, 2022 and, in connection therewith, entered into Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant transactions with respect to our common stock. For more information,
see
Note 11—Debt, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
|
|
(8)
|
In June 2017, we acquired DepositAccounts for $24.0 million in cash at closing and contingent consideration payments of up to $9.0 million, and acquired MagnifyMoney for $29.6 million in cash at closing. In September 2017, we acquired SnapCap for $11.9 million in cash at closing and up to three additional contingent consideration payments, each ranging from zero to $3.0 million. Total long-term liabilities at the end of 2017 included the fair value of DepositAccounts non-current contingent consideration of $4.3 million and the fair value of SnapCap contingent consideration of $7.0 million.
|
31
ITEM 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere within this report. This discussion includes both historical information and forward-looking information that involves risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from management's expectations as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those discussed in the sections entitled "Risk Factors" and "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information."
Company Overview
LendingTree, Inc. is the parent of LendingTree, LLC and several companies owned by LendingTree, LLC.
LendingTree operates what we believe to be the leading online loan marketplace for consumers seeking loans and other credit-based offerings. Our online marketplace provides consumers with access to product offerings from our Network Lenders, including mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, reverse mortgage loans, auto loans, credit cards, deposit accounts, personal loans, student loans, small business loans and other related offerings. In addition, we offer tools and resources, including free credit scores, that facilitate comparison shopping for these loans, deposits and other credit-based offerings. We seek to match consumers with multiple lenders, who can provide them with competing quotes for the product they are seeking. We also serve as a valued partner to lenders seeking an efficient, scalable and flexible source of customer acquisition with directly measurable benefits, by matching the consumer inquiries we generate with these lenders.
Our My LendingTree platform offers a personalized loan comparison-shopping experience by providing free credit scores and credit score analysis. This platform enables us to observe consumers' credit profiles and then identify and alert them to loan and other credit-based opportunities on our marketplace that may be more favorable than the loans they may have at a given point in time. This is designed to provide consumers with measurable savings opportunities over their lifetimes.
In addition to operating our core mortgage business, we are focused on growing our non-mortgage lending businesses and developing new product offerings and enhancements to improve the experiences that consumers and lenders have as they interact with us. By expanding our portfolio of loans and other product offerings, we are growing and diversifying our business and sources of revenue. We intend to capitalize on our expertise in performance marketing, product development and technology, and to leverage the widespread recognition of the LendingTree brand to effect this strategy.
We believe the consumer and small business financial services industry is in the early stages of a fundamental shift to online product offerings, similar to the shift that started in retail and travel many years ago and is now well established. We believe that like retail and travel, as consumers continue to move towards online shopping and transactions for financial services, suppliers will increasingly shift their product offerings and advertising budgets toward the online channel. We believe the strength of our brands and of our lender network place us in a strong position to continue to benefit from this market shift.
The LendingTree Loans business is presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and consolidated cash flows for all periods presented. Except for the discussion under the heading "Discontinued Operations," the analysis within Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations reflects our continuing operations.
Convertible Senior Notes and Hedge and Warrant Transactions
On May 31, 2017, we issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due June 1, 2022 and, in connection therewith, entered into Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant transactions with respect to our common stock. For more information,
see
Note 11—Debt, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
Recent Business Acquisitions
On September 19, 2017, we acquired certain assets of Snap Capital LLC, which does business under the name SnapCap for $11.9 million in cash at closing and contingent consideration payments of up to $9.0 million through March 31, 2020. SnapCap is a tech-enabled online platform, which connects business owners with lenders offering small business loans, lines of credit and merchant cash advance products through a concierge-based sales approach. We believe that by combining SnapCap's high-touch, high-conversion sales approach with our brand and performance marketing expertise, we can derive substantial revenue synergies and accelerate growth in our small business offering.
On June 20, 2017, we acquired the membership interests of Camino Del Avion (Delaware), LLC, which does business under the name MagnifyMoney for $29.6 million cash consideration at the closing of the transaction. MagnifyMoney is a leading consumer-facing media property that offers editorial content, expert commentary, tools and resources to help consumers compare
32
financial products and make informed financial decisions. The MagnifyMoney team brings the expertise and infrastructure to expand content creation and distribution across all of our consumer facing brands, improving our presence and efficacy in acquisition channels such as search engine optimization.
On June 14, 2017, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Deposits Online, LLC, which does business under the name DepositAccounts.com (“DepositAccounts”) for $24.0 million in cash at closing and contingent consideration payments of up to $9.0 million through June 30, 2020. DepositAccounts is a leading consumer-facing media property in the depository industry and is one of the most comprehensive sources of depository deals and analysis on the Internet, covering all major deposit product categories through editorial content, programmatic rate tables and user-generated content. This acquisition represents our first offering to address the asset side of the consumer balance sheet.
On November 16, 2016, we acquired Iron Horse Holdings, LLC, which does business under the name CompareCards for $80.7 million in cash at closing and contingent consideration payments of up to $22.5 million for each of 2017 and 2018, subject to achieving specific growth targets. CompareCards is a leading online source for side-by-side credit card comparison shopping. CompareCards provides consumers with one centralized location for pertinent credit card information needed to find the best card for their needs. CompareCards’ unique marketing platform and strong relationships with card issuers combined with LendingTree’s scale and organizational support have caused substantial growth in our credit card business.
These acquisitions continue our diversification strategy.
Acquisition of North Carolina Office Properties
In December 2016, we completed the acquisition of two office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina, for $23.5 million in cash. We intend to utilize one or both buildings in the future as our principal executive offices, and any unused space will continue to be occupied by tenants.
With our expansion in North Carolina, we received a grant from the state that provides up to $4.9 million in reimbursements over 12 years for investing in real estate and infrastructure in addition to increasing jobs in North Carolina at specific targeted levels through 2020, and maintaining the jobs thereafter. Additionally, the city of Charlotte and the county of Mecklenburg provided a grant that will be paid over five years and is based on a percentage of new property tax we pay on the development.
Recent Mortgage Interest Rate Trends
Interest rate and market risks can be substantial in the mortgage lead generation business. Short-term fluctuations in mortgage interest rates primarily affect consumer demand for mortgage refinancings, while long-term fluctuations in mortgage interest rates, coupled with the U.S. real estate market, affect consumer demand for new mortgages. Consumer demand, in turn, affects lender demand for mortgage leads from third-party sources. Typically, a decline in mortgage interest rates will lead to reduced lender demand, as there are more consumers in the marketplace seeking financing and, accordingly, lenders receive more organic lead volume. Conversely, an increase in mortgage interest rates will typically lead to an increase in lender demand, as there are fewer consumers in the marketplace and, accordingly, the supply of organic mortgage lead volume decreases.
According to Freddie Mac, 30-year mortgage interest rates generally increased from a monthly average of 3.67% in January 2015 to 3.96% by the end of 2015. During 2016, 30-year mortgage interest rates declined, reaching an average of 3.44% in August 2016, the lowest monthly average since January 2013. By December 2016, 30-year mortgage interest rates increased to an average of 4.20%. During 2017, 30-year interest rates then declined to a monthly average of 3.81% in September 2017, before increasing to 3.95% at the end of 2017.
On a full-year basis, 30-year mortgage interest rates increased to an average 3.99% in 2017, as compared to 3.65% and 3.85% in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
33
Typically, when mortgage interest rates decline, there are more consumers in the marketplace seeking refinancings and, accordingly, the mix of mortgage origination dollars will move towards refinance mortgages. According to Mortgage Bankers Association ("MBA") data, total refinance origination dollars increased from 45% of total 2015 mortgage origination dollars to 48% in 2016, as a result of the general decrease in average mortgage interest rates. Conversely, as average mortgage interest rates increased in 2017 compared to 2016, total refinance origination dollars in 2017 decreased to 35% of total mortgage origination dollars.
Looking forward, MBA is projecting 30-year mortgage interest rates to climb in 2018, to an average 4.8% on 30-year fixed rate mortgages. According to MBA projections, as interest rates climb, the mix of mortgage origination dollars will move towards purchase mortgages with the refinance share representing just 26% for 2018.
The U.S. Real Estate Market
The health of the U.S. real estate market and interest rate levels are the primary drivers of consumer demand for new mortgages. Consumer demand, in turn, affects lender demand for purchase mortgage leads from third-party sources. Typically, a strong real estate market will lead to reduced lender demand for leads, as there are more consumers in the marketplace seeking financing and, accordingly, lenders receive more organic lead volume. Conversely, a weaker real estate market will typically lead to an increase in lender demand, as there are fewer consumers in the marketplace seeking mortgages.
According to the National Association of Realtors ("NAR"), nationwide existing home sales in 2015 increased approximately 7% over 2014, equating to the housing market's best year in nearly a decade. While nationwide existing home sales in 2016 grew approximately 3% over 2015, growth in 2017 was 2% over 2016 due to limited inventory of homes for sale in 2017. The NAR expects essentially no change in existing home sales in 2018 from 2017 due to the continued trend of limited supply, but notes the strengthening economy and expectation of more millennials seeking to purchase homes as indicators of solid homebuying demand in 2018.
34
Results of Operations for the Years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
2017 vs. 2016
|
2016 vs. 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage products
|
$
|
275,910
|
|
$
|
219,991
|
|
$
|
165,272
|
|
$
|
55,919
|
|
25
|
%
|
$
|
54,719
|
|
33
|
%
|
||
|
Non-mortgage products
|
341,826
|
|
164,411
|
|
88,944
|
|
177,415
|
|
108
|
%
|
75,467
|
|
85
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Revenue
|
617,736
|
|
384,402
|
|
254,216
|
|
233,334
|
|
61
|
%
|
130,186
|
|
51
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of revenue
(exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
|
17,223
|
|
13,764
|
|
9,370
|
|
3,459
|
|
25
|
%
|
4,394
|
|
47
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Selling and marketing expense
|
432,784
|
|
261,100
|
|
172,849
|
|
171,684
|
|
66
|
%
|
88,251
|
|
51
|
%
|
|||||||
|
General and administrative expense
|
71,541
|
|
37,227
|
|
30,030
|
|
34,314
|
|
92
|
%
|
7,197
|
|
24
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Product development
|
17,925
|
|
13,761
|
|
10,485
|
|
4,164
|
|
30
|
%
|
3,276
|
|
31
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Depreciation
|
7,085
|
|
4,944
|
|
3,008
|
|
2,141
|
|
43
|
%
|
1,936
|
|
64
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
12,992
|
|
1,243
|
|
149
|
|
11,749
|
|
945
|
%
|
1,094
|
|
734
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
23,931
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
23,931
|
|
n/a
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Restructuring and severance
|
404
|
|
122
|
|
422
|
|
282
|
|
231
|
%
|
(300
|
)
|
(71
|
)%
|
|||||||
|
Litigation settlements and contingencies
|
718
|
|
129
|
|
(611
|
)
|
589
|
|
457
|
%
|
740
|
|
121
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Total costs and expenses
|
584,603
|
|
332,290
|
|
225,702
|
|
252,313
|
|
76
|
%
|
106,588
|
|
47
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Operating income
|
33,133
|
|
52,112
|
|
28,514
|
|
(18,979
|
)
|
(36
|
)%
|
23,598
|
|
83
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Other (expense) income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(7,028
|
)
|
(561
|
)
|
(171
|
)
|
(6,467
|
)
|
1,153
|
%
|
(390
|
)
|
(228
|
)%
|
|||||||
|
Other (expense) income
|
(396
|
)
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
(419
|
)
|
(1,822
|
)%
|
23
|
|
n/a
|
||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
25,709
|
|
51,574
|
|
28,343
|
|
(25,865
|
)
|
(50
|
)%
|
23,231
|
|
82
|
%
|
|||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
(6,291
|
)
|
(20,366
|
)
|
22,973
|
|
14,075
|
|
69
|
%
|
(43,339
|
)
|
(189
|
)%
|
|||||||
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
19,418
|
|
31,208
|
|
51,316
|
|
(11,790
|
)
|
(38
|
)%
|
(20,108
|
)
|
(39
|
)%
|
|||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(3,840
|
)
|
(3,714
|
)
|
(3,269
|
)
|
(126
|
)
|
(3
|
)%
|
(445
|
)
|
(14
|
)%
|
|||||||
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
$
|
15,578
|
|
$
|
27,494
|
|
$
|
48,047
|
|
$
|
(11,916
|
)
|
(43
|
)%
|
$
|
(20,553
|
)
|
(43
|
)%
|
||
Revenue
Revenue increased in 2017 compared to 2016 due to increases in our non-mortgage products of $177.4 million and in our mortgage products of $55.9 million.
Our non-mortgage products include the following non-mortgage lending products: personal loans, credit cards, home equity loans and lines of credit, reverse mortgage loans, auto loans, small business loans and student loans. Our non-mortgage products also include deposit accounts, home improvement referrals and other credit products such as credit repair and debt settlement. Many of our non-mortgage products are not individually significant to revenue. The increase in revenue from our non-mortgage products in 2017 compared to 2016 is primarily due to an increase in our credit cards, home equity, and personal loans products.
Revenue from our credit card product increased $107.6 million to $147.0 million in 2017 from $39.4 million in 2016, or 273%. Revenue from our credit card product increased in 2017 primarily due to the CompareCards acquisition, completed on November 16, 2016.
Revenue from our personal loan product increased $21.7 million to $88.2 million in 2017 from $66.5 million in 2016, or 33%. Revenue from our personal loan product increased in 2017 due to the number of consumers completing request forms as a result of increases in lender demand and corresponding increases in selling and marketing efforts, partially offset by decreases in revenue earned per consumer. Certain of our online personal loan lenders experienced well-publicized challenges in 2016, in particular, general unavailability of capital and increased pricing demanded by investors of personal loans, which in some cases led to reductions in marketing spend, and tightening in underwriting standards.
35
For 2017 and 2016, no other non-mortgage product represented more than 10% of revenue, however certain other non-mortgage products experienced notable increases. Revenue from our home equity product increased $28.3 million in 2017 compared to 2016, due to increases in the number of consumers completing request forms as a result of increases in lender coverage and lender demand, corresponding increases in selling and marketing efforts, and increased revenue earned per consumer. We believe the market for our non-mortgage products remains under-penetrated and we believe long-term growth prospects are strong for non-mortgage products. A significant industry-wide contraction in the availability of capital for non-mortgage lending products would likely adversely affect our non-mortgage product revenues. While we expect significant growth in our non-mortgage products in 2018 compared to 2017, we do not anticipate the growth rate will meet the 2017 growth of 108%.
The increase in revenue from our mortgage products in 2017 compared to 2016 is due to an increase in revenue from both our purchase and refinance products. The revenue from our purchase product increased $33.6 million in 2017 from 2016, while the revenue from our refinance product increased $22.4 million. The increase in revenue from our mortgage products is primarily due to an increase in revenue earned per consumer. Additionally, the number of consumers completing request forms for mortgage products increased in 2017 from 2016, due to an increase in lender demand and a corresponding increase in selling and marketing efforts. In 2018, we expect more moderate year-over-year growth in mortgage revenue.
Revenue increased in 2016 compared to 2015 due to increases in our non-mortgage products of $75.5 million and in our mortgage products of $54.7 million.
The increase in revenue from our non-mortgage products in 2016 compared to 2015 is primarily due to an increase in lenders on our exchange, increased marketing efforts and two business acquisitions. This resulted in an increase in the number of consumers completing request forms for non-mortgage products in 2016.
Revenue from our personal loan product increased $15.2 million to $66.5 million in 2016 from $51.3 million in 2015, or 30%. Revenue from our personal loan product increased in 2016 due to an increase in lenders on our exchange and increased marketing efforts, partially offset by decreases in revenue earned per consumer.
Revenue from our credit card product increased $29.6 million to $39.4 million in 2016 from $9.8 million in 2015, or 302%. Revenue from our credit card product increased in 2016 due to increases in payouts from issuers in addition to increased marketing efforts. Additionally, the CompareCards acquisition, completed on November 16, 2016, increased revenue by $9.2 million in 2016.
For 2016 and 2015, no other non-mortgage product represented more than 10% of revenue, however certain other non-mortgage products experienced notable increases. Revenue from our home equity product increased $13.6 million in 2016 compared to 2015, due to an increase in lender coverage and an increase in revenue earned per consumer combined with increased marketing efforts.
The increase in revenue from our mortgage products in 2016 compared to 2015 is primarily due to an increase in revenue from our refinance product. The revenue from our refinance product increased approximately $50.0 million in 2016 from 2015, primarily due to an increase in lender demand and an increase in marketing efforts. The number of consumers completing a request form for mortgage products increased in 2016 from 2015, partially offset by a decrease in revenue earned per consumer in 2016 compared to 2015.
Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of costs associated with compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) relating to internally-operated customer call centers, third-party customer call center fees, credit scoring fees, credit card fees, website network hosting and server fees.
Cost of revenue increased in 2017 from 2016, primarily due to increases of $2.1 million in compensation and benefits as a result of increases in headcount, $0.9 million in website network hosting and server fees and $0.8 million in third-party customer call center fees, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in credit scoring fees.
Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue decreased slightly to 3% in 2017 compared to 4% in 2016.
Cost of revenue increased in 2016 from 2015, primarily due to increases of $1.3 million in compensation and benefits as a result of increases in headcount, $0.9 million in credit scoring fees, $0.7 million in call center technology fees, $0.6 million in credit card fees and $0.4 million in lead verification fees.
Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue remained consistent at 4% in both 2016 and 2015.
36
Selling and marketing expense
Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising and promotional expenditures and compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in sales or marketing functions. Advertising and promotional expenditures primarily include online marketing, as well as television, print and radio spending. Advertising production costs are expensed in the period the related ad is first run.
The increases in selling and marketing expense in 2017 compared to 2016 and in 2016 compared to 2015 were primarily due to increases in advertising and promotional expense of $167.6 million and $84.0 million, respectively, as discussed below. In addition, selling and marketing expense increased in 2017 compared to 2016 and in 2016 compared to 2015 due to an increase in compensation and benefits of $4.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively, as a result of increases in headcount.
Advertising and promotional expense is the largest component of selling and marketing expense, and is comprised of the following:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
2017 vs. 2016
|
2016 vs. 2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Online
|
$
|
368,004
|
|
$
|
210,635
|
|
$
|
127,294
|
|
$
|
157,369
|
|
75
|
%
|
$
|
83,341
|
|
65
|
%
|
||||
|
Broadcast
|
35,681
|
|
28,455
|
|
28,066
|
|
7,226
|
|
25
|
%
|
389
|
|
1
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Other
|
7,098
|
|
4,131
|
|
3,863
|
|
2,967
|
|
72
|
%
|
268
|
|
7
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Total advertising expense
|
$
|
410,783
|
|
$
|
243,221
|
|
$
|
159,223
|
|
$
|
167,562
|
|
69
|
%
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
53
|
%
|
||||
Revenue is driven by lender demand for our products, which is matched to corresponding consumer loan requests. We adjust our selling and marketing expenditures dynamically in relation to anticipated revenue opportunities in order to ensure sufficient consumer inquiries to profitably meet lender demand. An increase in a product’s revenue is generally met by a corresponding increase in marketing spend, and conversely a decrease in a product’s revenue is generally met by a corresponding decrease in marketing spend. This relationship exists for both mortgage and non-mortgage products.
We increased our advertising expenditures in 2017 compared to 2016 and in 2016 compared to 2015, in order to generate additional consumer inquiries to meet the increased demand of lenders on our marketplace.
We will continue to adjust selling and marketing expenditures dynamically in relation to anticipated revenue opportunities.
General and administrative expense
General and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in finance, legal, tax, corporate information technology, human resources and executive management functions, as well as facilities and infrastructure costs and fees for professional services.
General and administrative expense increased in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily due to increases in compensation and benefits of $19.4 million as a result of increases in headcount and long-term equity awards granted to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in the third quarter of 2017, which awards have both time and significant performance-based vesting conditions. We granted long-term equity awards to certain members of our leadership team in the fourth quarter of 2017 and expect additional long-term awards to members of our leadership team in the first quarter of 2018. General and administrative expense is expected to increase in future periods due to the non-cash compensation expense related to these grants. This increase in general and administrative expense is expected to result in material reductions in net income from continuing operations in future periods compared to historical periods. For additional information regarding the awards granted to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in the third quarter of 2017,
see
Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Non-cash compensation expense is excluded from Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA"), as discussed below.
Included in general and administrative expense in 2017 was a $10.0 million charitable contribution to fund the newly formed LendingTree Foundation in the fourth quarter of 2017. This one-time item is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, as discussed below.
General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue increased to 12% in 2017 compared to 10% in 2016.
General and administrative expense increased in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to increases in compensation and benefits of $2.0 million as a result of increases in headcount, increases in professional fees of $3.1 million, increases in travel and entertainment expenses of $0.8 million, increases in facility expenses of $0.6 million and increases in other tax expense of $0.5
37
million. The increase in professional fees is partially due to an increase in acquisition related expenses of $0.9 million.
General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to 10% in 2016 compared to 12% in 2015.
Product development
Product development expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) and third-party labor costs that are not capitalized, for employees and consultants engaged in the design, development, testing and enhancement of technology.
Product development expense increased in 2017 compared to 2016 and in 2016 compared to 2015, as we continued to invest in internal development of new and enhanced features, functionality and business opportunities that we believe will enable us to better and more fully serve consumers and lenders.
Depreciation
The increases in depreciation expense in 2017 compared to 2016 and in 2016 compared to 2015 were primarily the result of higher investment in internally developed software in recent years, to support the growth of our business.
Amortization of intangibles
The increases in amortization of intangibles in 2017 compared to 2016 and in 2016 compared to 2015 were primarily due to intangible assets associated with our business acquisitions in 2017 and 2016.
Contingent consideration
During 2017, we recorded $23.9 million of contingent consideration expense due to an adjustment in the estimated fair value of the earnout payments related to the CompareCards, DepositAccounts and SnapCap acquisitions. The contingent consideration expense for the CompareCards acquisition was $21.2 million, primarily due to an increased probability of achievement of certain defined earning targets for CompareCards. The contingent consideration expense for the DepositAccounts acquisition was $2.0 million, primarily due to an increased probability of achievement of certain defined revenue targets for deposits products. The contingent consideration expense for the SnapCap acquisition was $0.7 million, primarily due to an increased probability of achievement of certain defined earnings targets for SnapCap.
Income tax expense
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|||||||||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
$
|
(6,291
|
)
|
$
|
(20,366
|
)
|
$
|
22,973
|
|
||
|
Effective tax rate
|
24.5
|
%
|
39.5
|
%
|
(81.1
|
)%
|
|||||
For 2017, the effective tax rate varied from the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the benefit derived from excess tax deductions from the vesting of restricted stock and exercise of stock options of $12.9 million, including state taxes, and the federal tax research credit. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2017, a net tax expense of $9.1 million was recorded related to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA"). The expense is primarily related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities considering the TCJA’s newly enacted tax rates and certain other impacts. Our determination of valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 related to the TCJA is provisional and is subject to adjustment during a measurement period of up to one year following the December 2017 enactment of the TCJA, as provided by recent SEC guidance.
For 2016, the effective tax rate varied from the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the benefit derived from the federal research tax credit, partially offset by state taxes, including the impact of a reduction in the North Carolina state income tax rate which reduced the value of our deferred tax assets. The federal research tax credit benefit is the result of a study completed during the second quarter for the open tax years of 2011 through 2015, plus an estimate of the benefit from current research activities.
For 2015, the effective tax rate varied from the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the reversal of the federal and partial reversal of the state valuation allowance set up in prior years against our deferred tax assets, partially offset by state taxes.
38
Discontinued Operations
On June 6, 2012, we sold substantially all of the operating assets of our LendingTree Loans business for approximately $55.9 million in cash to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Financial Services ("Discover").
Discover generally did not assume liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business that arose before the closing date, except for certain liabilities directly related to assets Discover acquired. Of the purchase price paid, as of
December 31, 2017
,
$4.0 million
is being held in escrow in accordance with the agreement with Discover for certain loan loss obligations that remain with us following the sale.
During
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, loss from discontinued operations of
$3.8 million
,
$3.7 million
and
$3.3 million
, respectively, was attributable to the LendingTree Loans business. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, loss from discontinued operations was primarily due to litigation settlements and contingencies and legal fees associated with ongoing legal proceedings.
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
We report Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to GAAP. This measure is the primary metric by which we evaluate the performance of our businesses, on which our marketing expenditures and internal budgets are based and by which management and many employees are compensated. We believe that investors should have access to the same set of tools that we use in analyzing our results. This non-GAAP measure should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. We provide and encourage investors to examine the reconciling adjustments between the GAAP and non-GAAP measures discussed below.
Definition of Adjusted EBITDA
We report Adjusted EBITDA as net income from continuing operations adjusted to exclude interest, income tax, amortization of intangibles and depreciation, and to further exclude (1) non-cash compensation expense, (2) non-cash impairment charges, (3) gain/loss on disposal of assets, (4) restructuring and severance expenses, (5) litigation settlements and contingencies and legal fees for certain patent litigation, (6) acquisitions and dispositions income or expense (including with respect to changes in fair value of contingent consideration), and (7) one-time items. Adjusted EBITDA has certain limitations in that it does not take into account the impact to our statement of operations of certain expenses, including depreciation, non-cash compensation and acquisition-related accounting. We endeavor to compensate for the limitations of the non-GAAP measures presented by also providing the comparable GAAP measures with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
One-Time Items
Adjusted EBITDA is adjusted for one-time items, if applicable. Items are considered one-time in nature if they are non-recurring, infrequent or unusual and have not occurred in the past two years or are not expected to recur in the next two years, in accordance with SEC rules. One-time items within the periods presented in this report include a $10.0 million contribution to fund the newly formed LendingTree Foundation in 2017 and $0.1 million related to an estimated settlement for unclaimed property in 2015.
Non-Cash Expenses that are Excluded from Adjusted EBITDA
Non-cash compensation expense consists principally of expense associated with grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options, some of which awards have performance-based vesting conditions. These expenses are not paid in cash, and we include the related shares in our calculations of fully diluted shares outstanding. Upon settlement of restricted stock units, exercise of certain stock options or vesting of restricted stock awards, the awards may be settled, on a net basis, with us remitting the required tax withholding amount from our current funds.
Amortization of intangibles are non-cash expenses relating primarily to intangible assets acquired through acquisitions. At the time of an acquisition, the intangible assets of the acquired company, such as purchase agreements, technology and customer relationships, are valued and amortized over their estimated lives.
39
The following table is a reconciliation of net income from continuing operations to Adjusted EBITDA.
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
$
|
19,418
|
|
$
|
31,208
|
|
$
|
51,316
|
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|||||||||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
12,992
|
|
1,243
|
|
149
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation
|
7,085
|
|
4,944
|
|
3,008
|
|
|||||
|
Restructuring and severance
|
404
|
|
122
|
|
422
|
|
|||||
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
839
|
|
640
|
|
748
|
|
|||||
|
Non-cash compensation
|
23,361
|
|
9,647
|
|
8,370
|
|
|||||
|
Contribution to LendingTree Foundation
|
10,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Estimated settlement for unclaimed property
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
134
|
|
|||||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
23,931
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition expense
|
1,595
|
|
959
|
|
84
|
|
|||||
|
Litigation settlements and contingencies
|
718
|
|
129
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
7,028
|
|
561
|
|
171
|
|
|||||
|
Rental depreciation and amortization of intangibles
|
1,475
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
6,291
|
|
20,366
|
|
(22,973
|
)
|
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
115,137
|
|
$
|
69,819
|
|
$
|
40,818
|
|
||
Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
As of
December 31, 2017
, we had
$368.6 million
of cash and cash equivalents and
$4.1 million
of restricted cash and cash equivalents, compared to
$91.1 million
of cash and cash equivalents and
$4.1 million
of restricted cash and cash equivalents as of
December 31, 2016
. Notable transactions affecting cash and cash equivalents during the reported periods are as follows:
2017
In May 2017, we issued $300.0 million of our 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes for net proceeds of $290.7 million. We used approximately $18.1 million of the net proceeds to enter into Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant transactions.
In 2017, we purchased an aggregate of 75,393 shares of our common stock pursuant to a stock repurchase program for $21.0 million, of which we paid
$19.9 million
prior to year-end.
In September 2017, we acquired certain assets of SnapCap for $11.9 million in cash at closing and potential future contingent consideration payments of up to $9.0 million through March 31, 2020, subject to achieving specific targets.
In June 2017, we acquired the membership interests of MagnifyMoney for $29.6 million cash consideration at the closing of the transaction.
In June 2017, we acquired substantially all of the assets of DepositAccounts for $24.0 million in cash at closing and potential future contingent consideration payments of up to $9.0 million through June 30, 2020, subject to achieving specified targets. We made a payment of $1.0 million related to contingent consideration in 2017.
2016
In 2016, we purchased an aggregate of 690,218 shares of our common stock pursuant to a stock repurchase program for $48.5 million.
In December 2016, we acquired two office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina for $23.5 million in cash. We anticipate incurring construction costs in 2018 to prepare the buildings for our corporate offices.
In November 2016, we acquired CompareCards for $80.7 million cash at closing and potential future contingent consideration payments of up to $22.5 million for each of 2017 and 2018, subject to achieving specified targets. We made the initial $22.5 million earnout payment in February 2018 and anticipate paying the remaining $22.5 million earnout in the first half of 2018.
40
2015
In November 2015, we completed an equity offering of 852,500 shares of our common stock. We received net proceeds of $91.5 million, after deducting approximately $5.9 million in underwriting discounts and $0.7 million in offering expenses.
We expect our cash and cash equivalents and cash flows from operations to be sufficient to fund our operating needs for the next twelve months and beyond. Our amended and restated revolving credit facility described below is an additional potential source of liquidity.
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
On November 21, 2017, we entered into an amended and restated $250.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility which matures on November 21, 2022 (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility can be used to finance working capital needs, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes, including to finance permitted acquisitions. As of
February 26, 2018
, we do not have any borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
For additional information on the Revolving Credit Facility,
see
Note
11
—Debt in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
Cash Flows from Continuing Operations
Our cash flows attributable to continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
103,538
|
|
$
|
64,214
|
|
$
|
37,185
|
|
||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(74,437
|
)
|
(117,215
|
)
|
4,901
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
253,125
|
|
(52,640
|
)
|
82,308
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our largest source of cash provided by our operating activities is revenues generated by our mortgage and non-mortgage products. Our primary uses of cash from our operating activities include advertising and promotional payments. In addition, our uses of cash from operating activities include compensation and other employee-related costs, other general corporate expenditures, litigation settlements and contingencies and income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities attributable to continuing operations increased in 2017 from 2016 primarily due to an increase in revenue, partially offset by an increase in selling and marketing expense. Additionally, there was a net increase in cash from changes in working capital primarily driven by changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, partially offset by changes in prepaids and income taxes receivable.
Net cash provided by operating activities attributable to continuing operations increased in 2016 from 2015 primarily due to an increase in revenue, partially offset by an increase in cost of revenue and selling and marketing. Additionally, there was an increase in cash from changes in working capital primarily driven by changes in accounts receivable and income taxes payable.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash
used in
investing activities attributable to continuing operations in
2017
of
$74.4 million
consisted primarily of the acquisition of SnapCap for $11.9 million, the acquisition of DepositAccounts for $25.0 million, the acquisition of MagnifyMoney for $29.5 million and capital expenditures of $8.0 million.
Net cash
used in
investing activities attributable to continuing operations in
2016
of
$117.2 million
consisted primarily of the acquisition of CompareCards for $81.2 million, the acquisition of SimpleTuition for $4.5 million, the acquisition of two office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina for $23.4 million and $10.6 million related to internally developed software and the acquisition of an aircraft. This was partially offset by a $2.5 million decrease in restricted cash due to the release of funds in escrow for the surety bonds due to a reduction in collateral requirements.
Net cash
provided by
investing activities attributable to continuing operations in
2015
of
$4.9 million
consisted primarily of $12.2 million in the release of restricted cash previously held in escrow in connection with the sale of LendingTree Loans, offset by capital expenditures of $7.2 million primarily related to internally developed software.
41
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash
provided by
financing activities attributable to continuing operations in
2017
of
$253.1 million
consisted primarily of $300.0 million of gross proceeds from the issuance of convertible senior notes and $43.4 million of proceeds from the sale of warrants in connection with the convertible senior notes, partially offset by $61.5 million for the payment of convertible note hedge transactions, $10.5 million for the payment of convertible senior note issuance costs and amended and restated revolving credit facility issuance costs and $19.9 million for the repurchase of our stock.
Net cash
used in
financing activities attributable to continuing operations in
2016
of
$52.6 million
consisted primarily of the repurchase of our stock of
$48.5 million
and $4.1 million in withholding taxes paid by us upon surrender of shares to satisfy obligations on equity awards.
Net cash
provided by
financing activities attributable to continuing operations in
2015
of
$82.3 million
consisted primarily of net proceeds from the November 2015 equity offering of $91.5 million, offset by
$7.6 million
in withholding taxes paid by us upon the surrender of shares to satisfy obligations on equity awards and $1.2 million for the payment of debt issuance costs.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than our operating lease obligations and funding commitments pursuant to our surety bonds, none of which have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
See
Note
12
—Commitments to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in the report for further details.
Summary of Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of
December 31, 2017
.
|
Payments Due By Period as of December 31, 2017
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Contractual Obligations
(a)
|
Total
|
Less Than
1 Year
|
1-3 Years
|
3-5 Years
|
More Than
5 Years
|
||||||||||
|
Operating lease obligations
(b)
|
$
|
5,076
|
|
$
|
1,754
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Long-term contractual obligations
(c)
|
68,733
|
|
50,373
|
|
18,360
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Convertible debt
|
300,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
300,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Total contractual obligations
|
$
|
373,809
|
|
$
|
52,127
|
|
$
|
21,560
|
|
$
|
300,122
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
(a)
|
Excludes potential obligations under surety and litigation bonds and the indemnification obligations, repurchase obligations and premium repayment obligations for which our HLC subsidiary continues to be liable following the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of our LendingTree Loans business in the second quarter of 2012. Excludes a $0.7 million accrual related to uncertain tax position, as we are unable to determine when, or if, payments for these taxes will ultimately be made.
|
|
(b)
|
Our operating lease obligations are associated with office space.
|
|
(c)
|
Includes a liability of $57.3 million for the estimated fair value of contingent consideration obligations reflected on the balance sheet for the acquisition of CompareCards, DepositAccounts, and SnapCap. Actual contingent consideration payments could range from $22.5 million to $45.0 million for CompareCards, $1.0 million to $8.0 million for DepositAccounts and zero to $9.0 million for SnapCap. Also includes a $0.5 million hold-back of the purchase price related to the SimpleTuition acquisition and $10.9 million of certain other commitments.
|
42
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following disclosure is provided to supplement the description of our accounting policies contained in Note
2
—Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report in regard to significant areas of judgment. This disclosure includes accounting policies related to both continuing operations and discontinued operations. Management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. They also impact the reported amount of net earnings during any period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Because of the size of the financial statement elements to which they relate, some of our accounting policies and estimates have a more significant impact on our consolidated financial statements than others. A discussion of some of our more significant accounting policies and estimates follows.
Loan Loss Obligations
We make estimates as to our exposure related to our obligation to repurchase loans previously sold to investors or to repay premiums paid by investors in purchasing loans, and reserve for such contingencies accordingly. Such payments to investors may be required in cases where underwriting deficiencies, borrower fraud and documentation defects occurred.
Our HLC subsidiary continues to be liable for certain indemnification obligations, repurchase obligations and premium repayment obligations following the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of our LendingTree Loans business on June 6, 2012. Approximately
$4.0 million
is being held in escrow pending resolution of certain of these contingent liabilities. We have been negotiating with certain secondary market purchasers to settle any existing and future contingent liabilities, but we may not be able to complete such negotiations on acceptable terms, or at all. Because we do not service the loans LendingTree Loans sold, we do not maintain nor have access to the current balances and loan performance data with respect to the individual loans previously sold to investors. Accordingly, we are unable to determine, with precision, our maximum exposure for breaches of the representations and warranties LendingTree Loans made to the investors that purchased such loans.
We estimate the liability for loan losses using a settlement discount framework. This approach estimates the lifetime losses on the population of remaining loans originated and sold by LendingTree Loans using actual defaults for loans with similar characteristics and projected future defaults. It also considers the likelihood of claims expected due to alleged breaches of representations and warranties made by LendingTree Loans and the percentage of those claims investors estimate LendingTree Loans may agree to repurchase. We then apply a settlement discount factor to the result of the foregoing to reflect publicly- announced bulk settlements for similar loan types and vintages, our own settlement experience, as well as LendingTree Loans' non-operating status, in order to estimate a range of the potential obligation. Changes to any one of these factors could significantly impact the estimate of the liability and could have a material and adverse impact on our results of operations for any particular period.
We have considered both objective and subjective factors in our estimation process, but given current general industry trends in mortgage loans as well as housing prices, market expectations and actual losses related to LendingTree Loans' obligations could vary significantly from the obligation recorded as of
December 31, 2017
of
$7.6 million
or the range of remaining loan losses of
$4.3 million
to
$7.8 million
.
See
Note
17
—Discontinued Operations—LendingTree Loans—Loan Loss Obligations to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional information on the loan loss reserve.
Income Taxes
Estimates of deferred income taxes and the significant items giving rise to the deferred assets and liabilities are shown in Note
10
—Income Taxes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, and reflect management's assessment of actual future taxes to be paid on items reflected in the consolidated financial statements, giving consideration to both timing and the probability of realization. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law, state income tax apportionment or the outcome of any review of our tax returns by the IRS, as well as actual operating results that may vary significantly from anticipated results.
We also recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on the two-step process prescribed by the accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. This measurement step is inherently difficult and requires subjective estimations of such amounts to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.
43
A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is
"more likely than not"
that the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, we concluded, based upon all available evidence, it was more likely than not we would have sufficient future taxable income to realize the majority of our net deferred tax assets. As a result, we released the majority of the valuation allowance in 2015. We significantly improved our operating performance in 2015, emerged from cumulative losses in previous years to a cumulative profit position and project taxable income in future years. While we believe the assumptions included in our projections of future taxable income are reasonable, if the actual results vary from expected results due to unforeseen changes in the economy or mortgage industry, or other factors, we may need to make future adjustments to the valuation allowance for all, or a portion, of the net deferred tax assets.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of
$2.7 million
and
$2.1 million
, respectively, primarily related to state net operating losses, which we do not expect to be able to utilize prior to expiration.
Stock-Based Compensation
The forms of stock-based awards granted to our employees are principally restricted stock units ("RSUs"), RSUs with performance conditions, restricted stock, stock options and stock options with performance conditions. Further, performance-based stock options with market conditions and time-vested restricted stock with a performance condition have been granted to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The value of RSU and restricted stock awards is measured at their grant dates as the fair value of common stock and amortized ratably as non-cash compensation expense over the vesting term. The value of stock options issued is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The value of performance-based awards is measured at their grant dates and recognized as non-cash compensation expense, considering the probability of the targets being achieved. Performance-based awards with a market condition are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model. If an award is modified, we determine if the modification requires a new calculation of fair value or change in the vesting term of the award.
See
Note
9
—Stock-Based Compensation to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional information on assumptions and inputs to the fair value determination of stock-based awards.
Evaluation of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets Impairment
We test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, primarily trade names and trademarks, annually for impairment as of October 1, or more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances. As part of our annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, in each instance, we may elect to assess qualitative factors as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the traditional quantitative impairment testing. If our assessment of these qualitative factors indicates that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value, then no further testing is required. Otherwise, the goodwill reporting unit or long-lived intangible assets, as applicable, must be quantitatively tested for impairment.
The quantitative test for goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. Performing the first step to compare reporting unit fair value with its carrying value using a discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis requires the exercise of significant judgments, including judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is required to be performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill (determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination) with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The quantitative impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets involves a DCF valuation analysis that employs a relief-from-royalty methodology in estimating the fair value of trade names and trademarks. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis include the determination of royalty rates, discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of future revenues. If the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets subject to assessment for impairment at
December 31, 2017
is
$113.4 million
and
$10.1 million
, respectively.
Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets
We review the carrying value of all long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, and definite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may be impaired. Impairment is considered to have occurred whenever the carrying value of a long-lived asset cannot be recovered from cash flows
44
that are expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. This recoverability test requires us to make assumptions and judgments related to factors used in a calculation of undiscounted cash flows, including, but not limited to, management’s expectations for future operations and projected cash flows. The key assumptions used in this calculation include Adjusted EBITDA, the remaining useful lives of the primary cash flow generating asset in the asset group and, to a lesser extent, the deduction of capital expenditures and taxes paid in cash to arrive at net cash flows.
The value of long-lived assets subject to assessment for impairment is
$107.4 million
at
December 31, 2017
.
Business Acquisitions
When we acquire businesses, we allocate the purchase price to tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired at their acquisition date fair values. Any residual purchase price is recorded as goodwill. We also estimate the fair value of any contingent consideration using Level 3 unobservable inputs. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are uncertain and involve significant judgments by management.
We reassess the fair value of contingent consideration quarterly until the contingency is resolved, and changes in the fair value are recorded in operating income in the consolidated statements of operations.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See
Note
2
—Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Other than our Revolving Credit Facility, which currently has no borrowings outstanding, we do not have any financial instruments that are exposed to significant market risk. We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in bank deposits and short-term, highly liquid money market investments. A hypothetical 100-basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair value of our cash equivalents securities, or our earnings on such cash equivalents, but would have an effect on the interest paid on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, if any. As of
February 26, 2018
, there were no borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. Increases in the Federal Funds interest rates may also affect contingent consideration payable to DepositAccounts.
See
Note 6 - Business Acquisition - 2017 Acquisitions - DepositAccounts.
Fluctuations in interest rates affect consumer demand for new mortgages and the level of refinancing activity which, in turn, affects lender demand for mortgage leads. Typically, a decline in mortgage interest rates will lead to reduced lender demand for leads from third-party sources, as there are more consumers in the marketplace seeking refinancings and, accordingly, lenders receive more organic lead volume. Conversely, an increase in mortgage interest rates will typically lead to an increase in lender demand for third-party leads, as there are fewer consumers in the marketplace and, accordingly, the supply of organic mortgage lead volume decreases.
45
ITEM 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
Page
Number
|
|
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES:
|
||
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
and Comprehensive Income
|
||
46
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of LendingTree, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LendingTree, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
47
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 26, 2018
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.
48
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
617,736
|
|
|
$
|
384,402
|
|
$
|
254,216
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Cost of revenue
(exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
|
17,223
|
|
|
13,764
|
|
9,370
|
|
||||
|
Selling and marketing expense
|
432,784
|
|
|
261,100
|
|
172,849
|
|
||||
|
General and administrative expense
|
71,541
|
|
|
37,227
|
|
30,030
|
|
||||
|
Product development
|
17,925
|
|
|
13,761
|
|
10,485
|
|
||||
|
Depreciation
|
7,085
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
3,008
|
|
||||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
12,992
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
149
|
|
||||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
23,931
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Restructuring and severance
|
404
|
|
|
122
|
|
422
|
|
||||
|
Litigation settlements and contingencies
|
718
|
|
|
129
|
|
(611
|
)
|
||||
|
Total costs and expenses
|
584,603
|
|
|
332,290
|
|
225,702
|
|
||||
|
Operating income
|
33,133
|
|
|
52,112
|
|
28,514
|
|
||||
|
Other (expense) income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(7,028
|
)
|
|
(561
|
)
|
(171
|
)
|
||||
|
Other (expense) income
|
(396
|
)
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
25,709
|
|
|
51,574
|
|
28,343
|
|
||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
(6,291
|
)
|
|
(20,366
|
)
|
22,973
|
|
||||
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
19,418
|
|
|
31,208
|
|
51,316
|
|
||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(3,840
|
)
|
|
(3,714
|
)
|
(3,269
|
)
|
||||
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
$
|
15,578
|
|
|
$
|
27,494
|
|
$
|
48,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Basic
|
11,945
|
|
|
11,812
|
|
11,516
|
|
||||
|
Diluted
|
13,682
|
|
|
12,773
|
|
12,541
|
|
||||
|
Income per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.44
|
|
$
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
49
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands, except par value
and share amounts)
|
||||||
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
368,550
|
|
|
$
|
91,131
|
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
4,091
|
|
|
4,089
|
|
||
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $675 and $1,059, respectively)
|
53,444
|
|
|
41,382
|
|
||
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
11,881
|
|
|
4,021
|
|
||
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
75
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Total current assets
|
438,041
|
|
|
140,623
|
|
||
|
Property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $13,043 and $9,739, respectively)
|
36,431
|
|
|
35,462
|
|
||
|
Goodwill
|
113,368
|
|
|
56,457
|
|
||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
81,125
|
|
|
71,684
|
|
||
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
20,156
|
|
14,610
|
|
|||
|
Other non-current assets
|
1,910
|
|
|
810
|
|
||
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
|
2,428
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
693,459
|
|
|
$
|
323,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
$
|
5,593
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
77,183
|
|
|
49,403
|
|
||
|
Current contingent consideration
|
46,576
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations (Note 17)
|
14,507
|
|
|
11,711
|
|
||
|
Total current liabilities
|
147,516
|
|
|
66,707
|
|
||
|
Long-term debt
|
238,199
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Non-current contingent consideration
|
11,273
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
||
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
1,597
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities
|
398,585
|
|
|
91,992
|
|
||
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 12 and 13)
|
|
|
|
||||
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Preferred stock $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Common stock $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 14,218,572 and 13,955,378 shares issued, respectively, and 11,979,434 and 11,791,633 shares outstanding, respectively
|
142
|
|
|
140
|
|
||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,087,582
|
|
|
1,018,010
|
|
||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(708,354
|
)
|
|
(722,630
|
)
|
||
|
Treasury stock; 2,239,138 and 2,163,745 shares, respectively
|
(85,085
|
)
|
|
(64,085
|
)
|
||
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 6)
|
589
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
294,874
|
|
|
231,435
|
|
||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
693,459
|
|
|
$
|
323,427
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
50
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
Number
of Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Number
of Shares
|
Amount
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
$
|
96,366
|
|
12,855
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
$
|
909,751
|
|
$
|
(798,171
|
)
|
1,468
|
|
$
|
(15,343
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
48,047
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
48,047
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Non-cash compensation
|
8,508
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,508
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(218
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Dividends
|
(11
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Issuance of common stock for stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, net of withholding taxes
|
(7,613
|
)
|
|
158
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(7,614
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Tax benefit from stock-based award activity
|
4,601
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,601
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from equity offering, net of offering costs
|
91,462
|
|
853
|
|
9
|
|
91,453
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
$
|
241,142
|
|
|
13,866
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,688
|
|
|
$
|
(750,124
|
)
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
$
|
(15,561
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
27,494
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
27,494
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Non-cash compensation
|
9,647
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,647
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(48,524
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
(48,524
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Issuance of common stock for stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, net of withholding taxes
|
(4,084
|
)
|
|
89
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(4,085
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Tax benefit from stock-based award activity
|
5,760
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,760
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
$
|
231,435
|
|
13,955
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
$
|
1,018,010
|
|
$
|
(722,630
|
)
|
2,164
|
|
$
|
(64,085
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
15,578
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
15,578
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Non-cash compensation
|
23,361
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
23,361
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(21,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
75
|
|
(21,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock for stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, net of withholding taxes
|
1,601
|
|
263
|
|
2
|
|
1,599
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Cumulative effect adjustment due to ASU 2016-09
|
985
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,287
|
|
(1,302
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Issuance of 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes, net
|
60,415
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
60,415
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Convertible note hedge
|
(61,500
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(61,500
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Sale of warrants
|
43,410
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
43,410
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 6)
|
589
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
589
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2017
|
$
|
294,874
|
|
|
14,218
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
1,087,582
|
|
|
$
|
(708,354
|
)
|
|
2,239
|
|
|
$
|
(85,085
|
)
|
$
|
589
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
51
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities attributable to continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
$
|
15,578
|
|
$
|
27,494
|
|
$
|
48,047
|
|
|
Less: Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
3,840
|
|
3,714
|
|
3,269
|
|
|||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
19,418
|
|
31,208
|
|
51,316
|
|
|||
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities attributable to continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
840
|
|
640
|
|
748
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
12,992
|
|
1,243
|
|
149
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation
|
7,085
|
|
4,944
|
|
3,008
|
|
|||
|
Rental amortization of intangibles and depreciation
|
1,474
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Non-cash compensation expense
|
23,361
|
|
9,647
|
|
8,508
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(6,370
|
)
|
6,367
|
|
(29,969
|
)
|
|||
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
|
23,931
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Bad debt expense
|
195
|
|
515
|
|
337
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
1,032
|
|
245
|
|
47
|
|
|||
|
Write-off of previously-capitalized debt issuance costs
|
90
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Amortization of convertible debt discount
|
6,385
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(11,381
|
)
|
(8,361
|
)
|
(16,598
|
)
|
|||
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
(5,358
|
)
|
(1,558
|
)
|
(874
|
)
|
|||
|
Income taxes receivable
|
(1,104
|
)
|
13,385
|
|
6,247
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
31,108
|
|
4,769
|
|
13,689
|
|
|||
|
Other, net
|
(160
|
)
|
1,170
|
|
577
|
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities attributable to continuing operations
|
103,538
|
|
64,214
|
|
37,185
|
|
|||
|
Cash flows from investing activities attributable to continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
(8,040
|
)
|
(31,955
|
)
|
(7,237
|
)
|
|||
|
Acquisition of intangible assets
|
(5
|
)
|
(2,030
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition of SnapCap
|
(11,886
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition of DepositAccounts
|
(25,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition of MagnifyMoney, net of cash acquired
|
(29,504
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition of CompareCards
|
—
|
|
(81,182
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Acquisition of other businesses
|
—
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
(37
|
)
|
|||
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
|
(2
|
)
|
2,452
|
|
12,175
|
|
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities attributable to continuing operations
|
(74,437
|
)
|
(117,215
|
)
|
4,901
|
|
|||
|
Cash flows from financing activities attributable to continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of payments related to net-share settlement of stock-based compensation
|
1,602
|
|
(4,085
|
)
|
(7,612
|
)
|
|||
|
Proceeds from the issuance of 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes
|
300,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Payment of convertible note hedge transactions
|
(61,500
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from the sale of warrants
|
43,410
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from equity offering, net of offering costs
|
—
|
|
(23
|
)
|
91,484
|
|
|||
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
(10,486
|
)
|
(8
|
)
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|||
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(19,901
|
)
|
(48,524
|
)
|
(218
|
)
|
|||
|
Dividends
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities attributable to continuing operations
|
253,125
|
|
(52,640
|
)
|
82,308
|
|
|||
|
Total cash provided by (used in) continuing operations
|
282,226
|
|
(105,641
|
)
|
124,394
|
|
|||
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Net cash used in operating activities attributable to discontinued operations
|
(4,807
|
)
|
(10,203
|
)
|
(3,631
|
)
|
|||
|
Total cash used in discontinued operations
|
(4,807
|
)
|
(10,203
|
)
|
(3,631
|
)
|
|||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
277,419
|
|
(115,844
|
)
|
120,763
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
91,131
|
|
206,975
|
|
86,212
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
368,550
|
|
$
|
91,131
|
|
$
|
206,975
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Interest paid
|
$
|
1,327
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
Income tax payments
|
20,359
|
|
3,095
|
|
703
|
|
|||
|
Income tax refunds
|
(133
|
)
|
(22
|
)
|
(96
|
)
|
|||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
52
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company Overview
LendingTree, Inc. ("LendingTree" or the "Company"), is the parent of LendingTree, LLC and several companies owned by LendingTree, LLC.
LendingTree operates what it believes to be the leading online loan marketplace for consumers seeking loans and other credit-based offerings. The Company offers consumers tools and resources, including free credit scores, that facilitate comparison-shopping for mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, reverse mortgage loans, auto loans, credit cards, deposit accounts, personal loans, student loans, small business loans and other related offerings. The Company primarily seeks to match in-market consumers with multiple lenders on its marketplace who can provide them with competing quotes for the loans, deposits or credit-based offerings they are seeking. The Company also serves as a valued partner to lenders seeking an efficient, scalable and flexible source of customer acquisition with directly measurable benefits, by matching the consumer loan inquiries it generates with these lenders.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LendingTree and all its wholly-owned entities. Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.
Discontinued Operations
The LendingTree Loans business is presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and consolidated cash flows for all periods presented. The notes accompanying these consolidated financial statements reflect the Company's continuing operations and, unless otherwise noted, exclude information related to the discontinued operations.
See
Note
17
—
Discontinued Operations for additional information.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenue primarily from match fees and closing fees. Revenue within the mortgage product category is primarily generated from match fees paid by network lenders that receive a loan request, and in some cases upfront fees or clicks or call transfers. In addition to match and other upfront fees, revenue within the non-mortgage product category is also generated from closing fees and approval fees.
Match fees are earned through the delivery of qualified loan requests that originated through the Company's websites or affiliates. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is deemed to have occurred at the time a loan request is delivered to the customer, provided that no significant obligations remain.
Closing fees are derived from lenders on certain auto, business, personal loan types and student loans when a transaction is closed with the consumer. Closed loan fees and closed sale fees are recognized at the time the lender reports the closed loan or closed sale to the Company, which could be several months after the original request is transmitted. For consumer credit card loan requests, the Company sends traffic to issuers and recognizes revenue at the time of card approval.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term, highly liquid money market investments with original maturities of three months or less.
53
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Restricted Cash
Cash escrowed or contractually restricted for a specific purpose is designated as restricted cash.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.
The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time accounts receivable are past due, previous loss history and the specific customer's current ability to pay its obligation. Accounts receivable are considered past due when they are outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms. Accounts receivable are written off when management deems them uncollectible.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Balance, beginning of the period
|
$
|
1,059
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
||
|
Charges to earnings
|
195
|
|
515
|
|
337
|
|
|||||
|
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable
|
(579
|
)
|
(62
|
)
|
(80
|
)
|
|||||
|
Balance, end of the period
|
$
|
675
|
|
$
|
1,059
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
||
Loan Loss Obligations (Discontinued Operations)
The Company's Home Loan Center, Inc. ("HLC") subsidiary, which during its period of active operation primarily conducted business as LendingTree Loans, sold loans it originated to investors on a servicing-released basis and the risk of loss or default by the borrower was generally transferred to the investor. However, LendingTree Loans was required by these investors to make certain representations relating to credit information, loan documentation and collateral. To the extent LendingTree Loans did not comply with such representations, LendingTree Loans may be required to repurchase loans or indemnify the investors for any losses from borrower defaults. LendingTree Loans maintains a liability for the estimated exposure relating to such contingent obligations and changes to the estimate are recorded in income from discontinued operations in the periods they occur.
The Company estimates the liability for loan losses using a settlement discount framework. This approach estimates the lifetime losses on the population of remaining loans originated and sold by LendingTree Loans using actual defaults for loans with similar characteristics and projected future defaults. It also considers the likelihood of claims expected due to alleged breaches of representations and warranties made by LendingTree Loans and the percentage of those claims investors estimate LendingTree Loans may agree to repurchase. The Company then applies a settlement discount factor to the result of the foregoing to reflect publicly-announced bulk settlements for similar loan types and vintages, the Company's own settlement experience, as well as LendingTree Loans' non-operating status, in order to estimate a range of potential liability. Changes to any one of these factors could significantly impact the estimate of the liability and could have a material impact on the Company's results of operations for any particular period.
See
Note
17
—Discontinued Operations—LendingTree Loans—Loan Loss Obligations for additional information on the loan loss reserve.
Segment Reporting
The Company has
one
reportable segment.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, including internally-developed software and significant improvements, are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Acquisition and construction costs for land and building is capitalized and depreciated over the applicable useful lives. Due to the rapid advancements in technology and evolution of company products, all internally-developed software is written-off at the end of its useful life. Repairs and maintenance and any gains or losses on dispositions are recognized as incurred in current operations.
54
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis to allocate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives. The following table presents the estimated useful lives for each asset category:
|
Asset Category
|
Estimated Useful Lives
|
|
Land
|
N/A
|
|
Building
|
34 years
|
|
Site Improvements
|
1 to 15 years
|
|
Computer equipment and capitalized software
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
Lesser of asset life or life of lease
|
|
Furniture and other equipment
|
3 to 7 years
|
|
Aircraft and automobile
|
5 to 10 years
|
Software Development Costs
Software development costs primarily include internal and external labor expenses incurred to develop the software that powers the Company's websites. Certain costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized based on specific activities tracked, while costs incurred during the preliminary project stage and post-implementation/operation stage are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software development costs are amortized over an estimated useful life of
one
to
three years
.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill acquired in business combinations is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the combination as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, primarily the Company's trade names and trademarks, are not amortized. Rather, these assets are tested annually for impairment as of October 1, or more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances.
As part of its annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, in each instance, the Company may elect to assess qualitative factors as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the traditional quantitative impairment testing. If the Company’s assessment of these qualitative factors indicates that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value, then no further testing is required. Otherwise, the goodwill reporting unit or long-lived intangible assets, as applicable, must be quantitatively tested for impairment.
The quantitative test for goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the first step, the Company determines the fair value of its reporting units by using a market approach and a discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis. Determining fair value using a DCF analysis requires the exercise of significant judgments, including judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not required. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is required to be performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The quantitative impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The estimates of fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets are determined using a DCF valuation analysis that employs a relief-from-royalty methodology in estimating the fair value of trade names and trademarks. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis include the determination of royalty rates, discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of future revenues.
For the October 1, 2017 and 2016 annual impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company elected to perform qualitative assessments as a precursor to the traditional quantitative tests. Results of the October 1, 2017 and 2016 annual impairment tests indicated that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible assets were each less than their respective carrying values. Accordingly, no further testing was required.
55
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets with Definite Lives
Long-lived assets include property and equipment and intangible assets with definite lives. Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives.
Long-lived assets are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the carrying amount is deemed to not be recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded as the amount by which the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value.
At
December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company performed its review of impairment triggering events for long-lived assets and determined that a triggering event had not occurred.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the assumptions used in pricing the asset or liability into the following three levels:
|
•
|
Level 1
: Observable inputs, such as quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets obtained from independent sources.
|
|
•
|
Level 2
: Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
•
|
Level 3
: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which require the Company to develop its own assumptions, based on the best information available under the circumstances, about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
|
The Company's non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment are recorded at fair value upon acquisition. These assets are remeasured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized. Such fair value measurements are based predominantly on Level 3 inputs.
Contingent consideration payments related to acquisitions are measured at fair value each reporting period using Level 3 unobservable inputs. The Company's estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are uncertain and involve significant judgments by management. Any changes in the fair value of these contingent consideration payments are included in operating income in the consolidated statements of operations.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of expenses associated with compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) related to internally-operated customer call centers, third-party customer call center fees, credit scoring fees, credit card fees, website network hosting and server fees.
Product Development
Product development expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) and third-party labor costs that are not capitalized, for employees and consultants engaged in the design, development, testing and enhancement of technology.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred (except for production costs which are initially capitalized and then recognized as expense when the advertisement first runs) and principally represent offline costs, including television, print and radio advertising, and online advertising costs, including fees paid to search engines and distribution partners. Advertising expense was
$410.8 million
,
$243.2 million
and
$159.2 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively, and is included in selling and marketing expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
56
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method, and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. In estimating future tax consequences, all expected future events are considered. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Interest is recorded on potential tax contingencies as a component of income tax expense and recorded net of any applicable related income tax benefit. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company followed the incremental or "with" and "without" approach to intraperiod tax allocation for determination of the amount of tax benefit to allocate to continuing operations as prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740-20-45-7 with the exception of the allocation of the release of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets which is governed by ASC 740-10-45-20.
In accordance with the accounting standard for uncertainty in income taxes, liabilities for uncertain tax positions are recognized based on the two-step process prescribed by the accounting standards. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA"). SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the TCJA enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the TCJA for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company's accounting for certain income tax effects of the TCJA is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. In accordance with SAB 118, the Company has determined that the $
9.1 million
of the deferred tax expense recorded in connection with the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities was a provisional amount and a reasonable estimate at December 31, 2017. Additional work is necessary for a more detailed analysis of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as potential correlative adjustments. Any subsequent adjustments to these amounts will be recorded to current tax expense in the quarter of 2018 when the analysis is complete.
Stock-Based Compensation
The forms of stock-based awards granted to LendingTree employees are principally restricted stock units ("RSUs"), RSUs with performance conditions, restricted stock, stock options and stock options with performance conditions. Further, performance-based stock options with market conditions and time-vested restricted stock with a performance condition have been granted to the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. RSUs are awards in the form of units, denominated in a hypothetical equivalent number of shares of LendingTree common stock and with the value of each award equal to the fair value of LendingTree common stock at the date of grant. RSUs may be settled in cash, stock or both, as determined by the Company's Compensation Committee at the time of grant. The Company does not have a history of settling these awards in cash. Each stock-based award is subject to service-based vesting, where a specific period of continued employment must pass before an award vests. The Compensation Committee can modify the vesting provisions of an award. Certain awards also include performance-based vesting, where certain performance targets set at the time of grant must be achieved before an award vests.
LendingTree recognizes as expense non-cash compensation for all stock-based awards for which vesting is considered probable. Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, the amount of non-cash compensation was reduced by estimated forfeitures, using a rate estimated at the grant date based on historical experience and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if the actual forfeiture rate differed from the estimated rate. Subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017, forfeitures are recognized when they occur.
For service-based awards, non-cash compensation is measured at fair value on the grant date and expensed ratably over the vesting term. The fair value of each stock option award without a market condition is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, while the fair value of an RSU or restricted stock award is measured as the closing common stock price at the time of grant. For performance-based awards, the fair value is measured on the grant date and recognized as non-cash compensation expense, considering the probability of the targets being achieved. Performance-based awards with a market condition are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
Subsequent to the Company's adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017, excess tax benefits and deficiencies that arise due to the difference in the measure of stock compensation and the amount deductible for tax purposes are prospectively
57
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
recorded in income tax expense within the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income, and are retrospectively classified as a component of operating cash flows within the consolidated statements of cash flows. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, these excess tax benefits were recognized in the consolidated statement of shareholders' equity and reported as a component of financing cash flows. For additional information on the adoption of ASU 2016-09, please see the section titled "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" within this Note.
Litigation Settlements and Contingencies
Litigation settlements and contingencies consists of expenses related to actual or anticipated litigation settlements, in addition to legal fees incurred in connection with various patent litigation claims the Company pursues against others.
The Company is involved in legal proceedings on an ongoing basis. If the Company believes that a loss arising from such matters is probable and can be reasonably estimated, the estimated liability is accrued in the consolidated financial statements. If only a range of estimated losses can be determined, an amount within the range is accrued that, in the Company's judgment, reflects the most likely outcome; if none of the estimates within that range is a better estimate than any other amount, the low end of the range is accrued. For those proceedings in which an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of losses or a conclusion that an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of losses arising directly from the proceeding (i.e., monetary damages or amounts paid in judgment or settlement) are not material is disclosed. Legal expenses associated with these matters are recognized as incurred.
Accounting Estimates
Management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. They also impact the reported amount of net earnings during any period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates underlying the accompanying consolidated financial statements, including discontinued operations, include: loan loss obligations; the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets; the determination of income taxes payable and deferred income taxes, including related valuation allowances; fair value of assets acquired in a business combination; contingent consideration related to business combinations; litigation accruals; various other allowances, reserves and accruals; and assumptions related to the determination of stock-based compensation.
Certain Risks and Concentrations
LendingTree's business is subject to certain risks and concentrations including dependence on third-party technology providers, exposure to risks associated with online commerce security and credit card fraud.
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk at
December 31, 2017
, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable, as disclosed in the consolidated balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents are in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits, but are maintained with quality financial institutions of high credit. The Company generally requires certain network lenders to maintain security deposits with the Company, which in the event of non-payment, would be applied against any accounts receivable outstanding.
Due to the nature of the mortgage lending industry, interest rate fluctuations may negatively impact future revenue from the Company's lender marketplace.
For the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
, one marketplace lender accounted for
11%
,
15%
and
11%
of total revenue, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, another marketplace lender accounted for revenue representing
13%
and
12%
of total revenue, respectively
Lenders participating on the Company's marketplace can offer their products directly to consumers through brokers, mass marketing campaigns or through other traditional methods of credit distribution. These lenders can also offer their products online, either directly to prospective borrowers, through one or more online competitors, or both. If a significant number of potential consumers are able to obtain loans from participating lenders without utilizing the Company's services, the Company's ability to generate revenue may be limited. Because the Company does not have exclusive relationships with the lenders whose loan offerings are offered on its online marketplace, consumers may obtain offers and loans from these lenders without using its service.
The Company maintains operations solely in the United States.
58
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2017-09 which clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions or the classification of the award changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. This ASU is effective prospectively for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The Company does not expect a material impact to its consolidated financial statements as a result of adoption.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge (Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test). Instead, an impairment charge will be based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. This ASU is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed in periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and whether to early adopt.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 which is intended to reduce the diversity in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows, by requiring entities to combine the changes in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in one line. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. In addition, if more than one line item is recorded on the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, a reconciliation between the statement of cash flows and balance sheet is required. This ASU is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The retrospective transition method, requiring adjustment to all comparative periods presented, is required. The Company expects adoption of this ASU to result in reclassifications of restricted cash inflows and outflows in the statement of cash flows.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 which addresses eight cash flow classification issues, eliminating the diversity in practice. This ASU is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The retrospective transition method, requiring adjustment to all comparative periods presented, is required unless it is impracticable for some of the amendments, in which case those amendments would be prospectively applied as of the earliest date practicable. The Company expects adoption of this ASU to impact the classification of contingent consideration payments.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 which simplifies various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, forfeitures and classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows. This ASU was effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption was permitted. Upon adoption, any adjustments are to be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company adopted this ASU during the first quarter of 2017.
The new standard requires excess tax benefits and deficiencies, which arise due to the difference in the measure of stock compensation and the amount deductible for tax purposes, to be recorded in earnings in income tax expense. These excess tax benefits and deficiencies were generally previously recorded in additional paid-in capital and had no impact on net income. The standard required prospective adoption for this portion of the new guidance. During 2017, the Company recognized $
12.9 million
of excess tax benefit, including state taxes, in income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Additionally, the new standard requires the excess tax benefits and deficiencies to be classified as an operating activity in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. These excess tax benefits and deficiencies were previously recorded as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. The standard allowed for either prospective or retrospective adoption for the change in presentation in the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to retrospectively adopt the classification change in the statement of cash flows. Accordingly, prior periods have been adjusted to increase the cash provided by operating activities and decrease the cash provided by financing activities by $
5.8 million
and $
4.6 million
in 2016 and 2015, respectively, within the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The standard also allows for an election by the Company to either estimate forfeitures, as required under previous guidance, or recognize forfeitures when they occur. The Company elected to recognize forfeitures of stock awards as they occur, with the modified retrospective transition method required. Accordingly, the Company recognized a
$1.4 million
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2017.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 related to leases. This ASU requires the recognition of a right-of-use lease asset and a lease liability by lessees for all leases greater than one year in duration. This ASU is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The guidance must be adopted using a
59
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
modified retrospective transition. The Company is evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and whether to early adopt.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 related to revenue recognition. This ASU was initiated as a joint project between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and international financial reporting standards ("IFRS"). This guidance will supersede the existing revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and was set to be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. However, in July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year, such that the standard will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The ASU can be applied (i) retrospectively to each prior period presented or (ii) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially adopting the ASU recognized at the date of initial application. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, which clarifies the principal versus agent guidance under ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, which clarifies the identification of distinct performance obligations in a contract. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, which clarifies the guidance on assessing collectability, presenting sales taxes, measuring noncash consideration and certain other transition matters. The clarification ASUs must be adopted concurrently with the adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company will adopt the ASUs as of January 1, 2018 and apply the modified retrospective transition approach. Under this approach, revenue for 2016 and 2017 will be reported in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income under ASC 605 and revenue for 2018 will be reported in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income applying the new ASUs. Additionally, the Company will disclose revenue for 2018 periods under ASC 605 in the footnotes to the financial statements. Under the new ASUs, the timing of recognizing revenue for closing fees and approval fees will be accelerated to the point when a loan request or a credit card consumer is delivered to the customer as opposed to when the consumer loan is closed by the lender or credit card approval is made by the issuer and communicated to the Company. The Company does not expect the adoption of the ASUs to have a material effect on annual revenue, net income from continuing operations or financial position.
Restricted cash and cash equivalents consists of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
||||||
|
Cash in escrow from sale of LendingTree Loans
(a)
|
$
|
4,034
|
|
$
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
Other
|
57
|
|
57
|
|
|||
|
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
4,091
|
|
$
|
4,089
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
HLC, a subsidiary of the Company, continues to be liable for certain indemnification obligations, repurchase obligations and premium repayment obligations following the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of its LendingTree Loans business in the second quarter of 2012.
|
60
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
4
—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The balance of property and equipment, net is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
5,818
|
|
$
|
5,818
|
|
|
|
Building
|
14,984
|
|
14,679
|
|
|||
|
Site improvements
|
950
|
|
950
|
|
|||
|
Computer equipment and capitalized software
|
16,885
|
|
14,886
|
|
|||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
3,257
|
|
3,048
|
|
|||
|
Furniture and other equipment
|
1,203
|
|
826
|
|
|||
|
Aircraft and automobile
|
2,621
|
|
1,988
|
|
|||
|
Projects in progress
|
3,756
|
|
3,006
|
|
|||
|
Total gross property and equipment
|
49,474
|
|
45,201
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(13,043
|
)
|
(9,739
|
)
|
|||
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
$
|
36,431
|
|
$
|
35,462
|
|
|
Unamortized capitalized software development costs, in service or under development, are
$9.5 million
and
$9.4 million
at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, respectively. Capitalized software development depreciation expense was
$5.7 million
,
$4.3 million
and
$2.6 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
In December 2016, the Company acquired
two
office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina for
$23.5 million
in cash, which included
$0.1 million
in acquisition-related costs which were capitalized. The Company intends to utilize one or both buildings in the future as the corporate headquarters and to continue to rent any unused space. The acquisition has been accounted for as an asset purchase and the allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
Fair Value
|
Weighted
Average
Depreciation Life
|
||||
|
Land
|
$
|
5,818
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Building
|
14,679
|
|
34.0 years
|
||
|
Site improvements
|
950
|
|
6.6 years
|
||
|
Tenant leases
|
2,029
|
|
3.2 years
|
||
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
23,476
|
|
||
Future rental income from the building tenants as of
December 31, 2017
under operating lease agreements having an initial or remaining non-cancelable lease term in excess of
one year
are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
Year ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
||
|
2018
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
2019
|
558
|
|
|
|
2020
|
574
|
|
|
|
2021
|
188
|
|
|
|
2022
|
37
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
102
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,274
|
|
Rental income of
$1.6 million
in 2017 is included in other income on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
61
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The balance of goodwill, net is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
Goodwill
|
Accumulated Impairment Loss
|
Net Goodwill
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
$
|
486,720
|
|
$
|
(483,088
|
)
|
$
|
3,632
|
|
||
|
Acquisition of CompareCards
|
52,450
|
|
—
|
|
52,450
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition of SimpleTuition
|
375
|
|
—
|
|
375
|
|
|||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
$
|
539,545
|
|
$
|
(483,088
|
)
|
$
|
56,457
|
|
||
|
Acquisition of DepositAccounts
|
19,389
|
|
—
|
|
19,389
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition of MagnifyMoney
|
23,784
|
|
—
|
|
23,784
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition of SnapCap
|
13,738
|
|
—
|
|
13,738
|
|
|||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
596,456
|
|
$
|
(483,088
|
)
|
$
|
113,368
|
|
||
The balance of intangible assets, net is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives
|
$
|
10,142
|
|
$
|
10,142
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets with definite lives, net
|
70,983
|
|
61,542
|
|
|||
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
$
|
81,125
|
|
$
|
71,684
|
|
|
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
The Company's goodwill is associated with its
one
reportable segment. The carrying amount of goodwill increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 due to the acquisitions of DepositAccounts, MagnifyMoney and SnapCap, and increased during the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the acquisitions of CompareCards and SimpleTuition.
See
Note
6
—Business Acquisitions for a discussion of the acquisitions and associated goodwill. Results of the annual impairment test as of October 1,
2017
indicated that
no
impairment had occurred.
Intangible assets with indefinite lives relate to the Company's trademarks. Results of the annual impairment test as of October 1,
2017
indicated that
no
impairment had occurred.
Intangible Assets with Definite Lives
Intangible assets with definite lives relate to the following
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
Weighted Average
Amortization Life
|
Cost
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
|
||||||||||
|
Technology
|
4.2 years
|
$
|
37,500
|
|
$
|
(8,694
|
)
|
$
|
28,806
|
|
|||
|
Customer lists
|
11.3 years
|
33,100
|
|
(3,239
|
)
|
29,861
|
|
||||||
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
4.5 years
|
6,942
|
|
(1,992
|
)
|
4,950
|
|
||||||
|
Tenant leases
|
3.3 years
|
1,362
|
|
(504
|
)
|
858
|
|
||||||
|
Website content
|
3.0 years
|
7,800
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
6,500
|
|
||||||
|
Other
|
3.0 years
|
256
|
|
(248
|
)
|
8
|
|
||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
86,960
|
|
$
|
(15,977
|
)
|
$
|
70,983
|
|
||||
62
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Weighted Average
Amortization Life
|
Cost
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
|
||||||||||
|
Technology
|
4.0 years
|
$
|
28,300
|
|
$
|
(659
|
)
|
$
|
27,641
|
|
|||
|
Customer lists
|
11.7 years
|
28,100
|
|
(639
|
)
|
27,461
|
|
||||||
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
4.5 years
|
5,342
|
|
(937
|
)
|
4,405
|
|
||||||
|
Tenant leases
|
3.2 years
|
2,030
|
|
—
|
|
2,030
|
|
||||||
|
Other
|
3.0 years
|
250
|
|
(245
|
)
|
5
|
|
||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
$
|
64,022
|
|
$
|
(2,480
|
)
|
$
|
61,542
|
|
||||
Amortization of intangible assets with definite lives is computed on a straight-line basis and, based on balances as of
December 31, 2017
, future amortization is estimated to be as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Amortization Expense
|
||
|
Year ending December 31, 2018
|
$
|
16,250
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2019
|
15,995
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2020
|
13,970
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2021
|
5,763
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2022
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
15,103
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets with definite lives, net
|
$
|
70,983
|
|
See
Note
6
—Business Acquisitions for a discussion of the DepositAccounts, MagnifyMoney, SnapCap and CompareCards acquisitions and associated intangibles.
In December 2016, the Company acquired
two
office buildings in Charlotte, North Carolina.
See
Note
4
—Property and Equipment for a discussion of the purchase and associated intangibles.
NOTE
6
—BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
2017 Acquisitions
SnapCap
On September 19, 2017, the Company acquired certain assets of Snap Capital LLC, which does business under the name SnapCap (“SnapCap”). SnapCap, a tech-enabled online platform, connects business owners with lenders offering small business loans, lines of credit and merchant cash advance products through a concierge-based sales approach.
The Company paid
$11.9 million
of initial cash consideration and could make up to
three
additional contingent consideration payments, each ranging from
zero
to
$3.0 million
, based on certain defined operating results during the periods of October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018, October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020. These additional payments, to the extent earned, will be payable in cash. The purchase price for the acquisition is
$18.2 million
, comprised of the upfront cash payment of
$11.9 million
and
$6.3 million
for the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration.
As of December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration totaled
$7.0 million
, which is included in non-current contingent consideration in the accompanying balance sheet. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration payments is determined using an option pricing model. The estimated value of the contingent consideration is based upon available information and certain assumptions, known at the time of this report, which management believes are reasonable. Any differences in the actual contingent consideration payments will be recorded in operating income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. During 2017, the Company recorded
$0.7 million
of contingent consideration expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income due to the change in estimated fair value of the contingent consideration.
63
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination. During 2017, the Company completed the determination of the final allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
||
|
Net working capital and other assets
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
146
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
18,226
|
|
The Company primarily used the income approach for the valuation as appropriate, and used valuation inputs in these models and analyses that were based on market participant assumptions. Market participants are buyers and sellers unrelated to the Company and fair value is determined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction at the measurement date.
The acquired intangible assets are definite-lived assets consisting primarily of developed technology, customer relationships and trade name and trademarks. The estimated fair values of the developed technology were determined using cost savings analysis, the customer relationships were determined using the excess earnings analysis method and the trade name and trademarks were determined using relief from royalty analysis. The fair value of the intangible assets with definite lives are as follows
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
Weighted Average Amortization Life
|
||
|
Technology
|
$
|
400
|
|
3 years
|
|
Customer lists
|
3,300
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
Trade name and trademarks
|
600
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
8.7 years
|
The Company recorded goodwill of
$13.7 million
, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the intangible assets acquired. The goodwill is primarily attributable to SnapCap as a going concern which represents the ability of the Company to earn a higher return on the collection of assets and business of SnapCap than if those assets were to be acquired and managed separately. The benefit of access to the workforce is an additional element of goodwill. The goodwill is recorded in the Company’s one reportable segment. For income tax purposes, the acquisition was an asset purchase and the goodwill will be tax deductible. Acquisition-related costs were
$0.3 million
in 2017 and are included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
MagnifyMoney
On June 20, 2017, the Company acquired the membership interests of Camino Del Avion (Delaware), LLC, which does business under the name MagnifyMoney (“MagnifyMoney”) for
$29.6 million
cash consideration at the closing of the transaction. Camino del Avion (Delaware), LLC was immediately merged with and into LendingTree, LLC following such acquisition. MagnifyMoney is a leading consumer-facing media property that offers editorial content, expert commentary, tools and resources to help consumers compare financial products and make informed financial decisions. The Company also has an option to acquire a foreign affiliate for an estimated fair value of
$0.5 million
at any time during the
three
years after the closing. This foreign affiliate provides technology and research support to MagnifyMoney under a services agreement.
In addition, the Company issued two key employees of MagnifyMoney restricted stock unit awards for a total of
38,468
shares of Company common stock, and may issue a further restricted stock unit award for
19,234
shares to a third key employee of the foreign affiliate should he become employed by the Company following the Company’s exercise of the option to acquire the foreign affiliate. The total value of these restricted stock unit awards was
$10.0 million
on June 20, 2017. All of these restricted stock units will vest, if at all, on the basis of performance conditions following the acquisition.
64
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination. During 2017, the Company completed the determination of the final allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
||
|
Net working capital
|
$
|
921
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
23,784
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
29,592
|
|
The Company primarily used the income approach for the valuation as appropriate, and used valuation inputs in these models and analyses that were based on market participant assumptions. Market participants are buyers and sellers unrelated to the Company and fair value is determined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction at the measurement date.
The acquired intangible assets are definite-lived assets consisting primarily of content, developed technology, customer relationships and trade name and trademarks. The estimated fair values of the content was determined using excess earnings analysis, developed technology was determined using cost savings analysis, the customer relationships were determined using the distributor method and the trade name and trademarks were determined using relief from royalty analysis.
The fair value of the intangible assets with definite lives are as follows
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
Weighted Average Amortization Life
|
||
|
Technology
|
$
|
200
|
|
3 years
|
|
Customer lists
|
1,100
|
|
9 years
|
|
|
Trade name and trademarks
|
600
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
Content
|
7,800
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
3.7 years
|
The Company recorded goodwill of
$23.8 million
, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, net of the liabilities assumed. The goodwill is primarily attributable to MagnifyMoney as a going concern which represents the ability of the Company to earn a higher return on the collection of assets and business of MagnifyMoney than if those assets were to be acquired and managed separately. The benefit of access to the workforce is an additional element of goodwill. The goodwill is recorded in the Company’s
one
reportable segment. For income tax purposes, the acquisition was an equity purchase and the goodwill will not be tax deductible. Acquisition-related costs were
$0.4 million
in 2017 and are included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
The Company has determined that the foreign entity which provides technology and research support to MagnifyMoney under a services agreement is a variable interest entity which must be consolidated for financial reporting. The Company has recorded the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest in this entity at their estimated fair value.
DepositAccounts
On June 14, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Deposits Online, LLC, which does business under the name DepositAccounts.com (“DepositAccounts”). DepositAccounts is a leading consumer-facing media property in the depository industry and is one of the most comprehensive sources of depository deals and analysis on the Internet, covering all major deposit product categories through editorial content, programmatic rate tables and user-generated content.
The Company paid
$24.0 million
of initial cash consideration and could make additional contingent consideration payments of up to
$9.0 million
. The potential contingent consideration payments are comprised of (i) up to
seven
payments of
$1.0 million
each based on specified increases in Federal Funds interest rates during the period commencing on the closing date and ending on June 30, 2020 and (ii) a one-time performance payment of up to
$2.0 million
based on the net revenue of deposit products during the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. These additional payments, to the extent earned, will be payable in
65
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
cash. The purchase price for the acquisition is
$29.0 million
, comprised of the upfront cash payment of
$24.0 million
and
$5.0 million
for the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration at the time of closing the acquisition.
In the third quarter of 2017, the Company made a payment of
$1.0 million
associated with a specified increase in the Federal Funds rate in June 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration totaled
$6.0 million
, of which
$1.7 million
is included in current contingent consideration and
$4.3 million
is included in non-current contingent consideration in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The estimated fair value of the portion of the contingent consideration payments based on increases in interest rates is determined using a scenario approach based on the interest rate forecasts of Federal Open Market Committee participants. The estimated fair value of the portion of the contingent consideration payments potentially earned based on net revenue is determined using an option pricing model. The estimated value of the contingent consideration is based upon available information and certain assumptions, known at the time of this report, which management believes are reasonable. Any differences in the actual contingent consideration payments will be recorded in operating income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. During 2017, the Company recorded
$2.0 million
of contingent consideration expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income due to the change in estimated fair value of the contingent consideration.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination. During 2017, the Company completed the determination of the final allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
||
|
Intangible assets
|
$
|
9,600
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
19,389
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
28,989
|
|
The Company primarily used the income approach for the valuation as appropriate, and used valuation inputs in these models and analyses that were based on market participant assumptions. Market participants are buyers and sellers unrelated to the Company and fair value is determined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction at the measurement date.
The acquired intangible assets are definite-lived assets consisting primarily of developed technology, customer relationships and trade name and trademarks. The estimated fair values of the developed technology were determined using excess earnings analysis, the customer relationships were determined using the distributor method and the trade name and trademarks were determined using relief from royalty analysis. The fair value of the intangible assets with definite lives are as follows
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
Weighted Average Amortization Life
|
||
|
Technology
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
5 years
|
|
Customer lists
|
600
|
|
8 years
|
|
|
Trade name and trademarks
|
400
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
$
|
9,600
|
|
5.2 years
|
The Company recorded goodwill of
$19.4 million
, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the intangible assets acquired. The goodwill is primarily attributable to DepositAccounts as a going concern which represents the ability of the Company to earn a higher return on the collection of assets and business of DepositAccounts than if those assets were to be acquired and managed separately. The benefit of access to the workforce is an additional element of goodwill. The goodwill is recorded in the Company’s one reportable segment. For income tax purposes, the acquisition was an asset purchase and the goodwill will be tax deductible. Acquisition-related costs were
$0.3 million
in 2017 and are included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
2016 Acquisitions
CompareCards
On November 16, 2016, the Company acquired all of the membership interests of Iron Horse Holdings, LLC, which does business under the name CompareCards ("CompareCards"). CompareCards is an online marketing platform for credit cards, which the Company is utilizing to grow its existing credit card business. The Company paid
$80.7 million
in initial cash consideration
66
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and agreed to make
two
earnout payments, each up to
$22.5 million
, based on the amount of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization CompareCards generates during the periods of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, or up to
$45.0 million
in aggregate payments. The purchase price for the acquisition is
$103.8 million
comprised of an upfront cash payment of
$80.7 million
on November 16, 2016 and
$23.1 million
for the estimated fair value of the earnout payments at the time of closing the acquisition. In February 2018, the Company paid
$22.5 million
related to the earnout payment for the period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of the earnout payments totaled
$44.3 million
, which is included in current contingent consideration in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The estimated fair value of the earnout payments is determined using an option pricing model. The estimated value of the earnout payments is based upon available information and certain assumptions, known at the time of this report, which management believes are reasonable. Any differences in the actual earnout payments from the current estimated fair value of the earnout payments will be recorded in operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. During 2017, the Company recorded
$21.2 million
of contingent consideration expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income due to the change in estimated fair value of the earnout payments.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination. During 2017, the Company completed the determination of the final allocation of the purchase price with respect to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
||
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
3,538
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
55,400
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
52,450
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(7,638
|
)
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
103,750
|
|
The Company primarily used the income approach for the valuation as appropriate, and used valuation inputs in these models and analyses that were based on market participant assumptions. Market participants are buyers and sellers unrelated to the Company and fair value is determined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction at the measurement date.
The acquired intangible assets are definite-lived assets consisting primarily of developed technology, customer relationships, and trade name and trademarks. The estimated fair values of the developed technology was determined using excess earnings analysis, the customer relationships were determined using the distributor method and the trade name and trademarks were determined using relief from royalty analysis. The fair value of the intangible assets with definite lives are as follows
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
Fair Value
|
Weighted Average
Amortization Life
|
|||
|
Technology
|
$
|
27,900
|
|
4 years
|
|
Customer lists
|
23,200
|
|
12 years
|
|
|
Trade name and trademarks
|
4,300
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
$
|
55,400
|
|
7.4 years
|
The Company recorded goodwill of
$52.5 million
, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired, net of the liabilities assumed. The goodwill is primarily attributable to CompareCards as a going concern, which represents the ability of the Company to earn a higher return on the collection of assets and business of CompareCards than if those assets and business were to be acquired and managed separately. The benefit of access to the work force is an additional relevant element of goodwill. The goodwill is recorded in the Company’s
one
reportable segment. For income tax purposes, the acquisition was an asset purchase and the goodwill will be tax deductible.
Acquisition-related costs of
$0.1 million
and
$0.4 million
in 2017 and 2016, respectively, are included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
67
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SimpleTuition, Inc.
On May 31, 2016, the Company acquired certain assets of SimpleTuition, Inc. ("SimpleTuition"), a leading online marketing platform for student loans, for
$5.0 million
of cash consideration. Of the purchase price,
$4.5 million
was funded with available cash on hand and
$0.5 million
was held-back in satisfaction of any potential claims.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination. During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company completed its determination of the final allocation of the purchase price with respect to the acquired assets. The Company has recorded the
$5.0 million
paid to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair value, with the residual recorded to goodwill in the Company's
one
reportable segment. No liabilities were assumed. Acquisition-related costs were
$0.1 million
for 2016 and are included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired is as follows
(dollars in thousands)
:
|
|
Fair Value
|
Weighted Average
Amortization Life
|
|||
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
125
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Total intangible assets with definite lives, net
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
9.2 years
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
375
|
|
N/A
|
|
The purchase was an asset acquisition for income tax purposes and the Company will deduct the recognized goodwill for income tax purposes. The acquisition of SimpleTuition was not considered significant to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Pro forma Financial Results and Other Information
The unaudited pro forma financial results for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 combine the consolidated results of the Company and CompareCards, DepositAccounts, MagnifyMoney and SnapCap giving effect to the acquisitions as if the CompareCards acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2015 and as if the DepositAccounts, MagnifyMoney and SnapCap acquisitions had been completed on January 1, 2016. This unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of future operations or results had the acquisitions been completed as of January 1, 2015 or 2016, or any other date.
The unaudited pro forma financial results include adjustments for additional amortization expense based on the fair value of the intangible assets with definite lives and their estimated useful lives. The provision for income taxes from continuing operations has also been adjusted to reflect taxes on the historical results of operations of CompareCards, DepositAccounts and SnapCap. CompareCards, DepositAccounts and SnapCap did not pay taxes at the entity level as these entities were limited liability companies whose members elected for them to be taxed as a partnership.
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||
|
Pro forma revenue
|
$
|
626,578
|
|
$
|
461,969
|
|
|
Pro forma net income from continuing operations
|
$
|
19,575
|
|
$
|
31,139
|
|
The unaudited pro forma net income from continuing operations in 2017 include the aggregate after tax contingent consideration expense associated with the CompareCards, DepositAccounts and SnapCap earnouts of
$14.4 million
. The unaudited pro forma net income from continuing operations for 2016 has been adjusted to include acquisition-related costs of
$1.0 million
incurred by the Company, DepositAccounts, MagnifyMoney and SnapCap that are directly attributable to the acquisitions, which will not have an ongoing impact. Accordingly, the acquisition-related costs have been eliminated from the unaudited pro forma net income from continuing operations for 2017.
The Company’s consolidated results of operations include the results of the business acquisitions completed in 2017 as of the acquisition dates. In 2017, revenue of
$9.2 million
and net income from continuing operations of
$1.5 million
, which excludes any contingent consideration expense associated with the acquisitions, have been included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations.
68
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
December 31, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
||||||
|
Accrued litigation liabilities
|
$
|
346
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
|
Accrued advertising expense
|
40,727
|
|
26,976
|
|
|||
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
7,679
|
|
5,626
|
|
|||
|
Accrued professional fees
|
2,072
|
|
1,411
|
|
|||
|
Customer deposits and escrows
|
5,564
|
|
5,041
|
|
|||
|
Contribution to LendingTree Foundation
|
10,000
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
10,795
|
|
9,613
|
|
|||
|
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
$
|
77,183
|
|
$
|
49,403
|
|
|
NOTE
8
—SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share was determined based on the following share data
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||
|
Weighted average basic common shares
|
11,945
|
|
11,812
|
|
11,516
|
|
||
|
Effect of stock options
|
1,626
|
|
886
|
|
866
|
|
||
|
Effect of dilutive share awards
|
111
|
|
75
|
|
159
|
|
||
|
Effect of Convertible Senior Notes
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Weighted average diluted common shares
|
13,682
|
|
12,773
|
|
12,541
|
|
||
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the weighted average shares that were anti-dilutive, and therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share, included options to purchase
0.1 million
shares of common stock.
The
0.625%
Convertible Senior Notes due June 1, 2022 and the warrants issued by the Company in the second quarter of 2017 could be converted into the Company’s common stock in the future, subject to certain contingencies.
See
Note
11
—Debt for additional information. Shares of the Company’s common stock associated with these instruments were excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share during 2017 as they were anti-dilutive since the conversion price of the Convertible Senior Notes and the strike price of the warrants were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock.
See
Note
9
—Stock-Based Compensation for a full description of outstanding equity awards.
Common Stock Repurchases
In each of January 2010, May 2014, January 2016 and February 2016, the board of directors authorized and the Company announced the repurchase of up to
$10.0 million
,
$10.0 million
,
$50.0 million
and
$40.0 million
, respectively, of LendingTree's common stock. During the years ended December 31,
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, the Company purchased
75,393
,
690,218
and
5,250
shares, respectively, of its common stock for aggregate consideration of
$21.0 million
,
$48.5 million
and
$0.2 million
, respectively. At
December 31, 2017
,
$27.7 million
remains authorized for share repurchase.
Equity Offering
In November 2015, the Company completed an equity offering of
852,500
shares of its common stock. The common stock was issued at a price of
$115.00
per share. The Company received net proceeds of
$91.5 million
, after deducting approximately
$5.9 million
in underwriting discounts and
$0.7 million
in offering expenses.
69
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
9
—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company currently has
two
active plans, the Fifth Amended and Restated LendingTree 2008 Stock and Annual Incentive Plan (the "Equity Award Plan") and the LendingTree 2017 Inducement Grant Plan (the "Inducement Plan"), under which future awards may be granted, which currently covers outstanding stock options to acquire shares of the Company's common stock, restricted stock, RSUs and RSUs with performance conditions, and provides for the future grants of these and other equity awards. Under the Equity Award Plan and the Inducement Plan, the Company is authorized to grant stock options, restricted stock, RSUs and other equity-based awards for up to
5.35 million
and
0.5 million
shares, respectively, of LendingTree common stock to employees, and, under the Equity Award Plan only, to non-employee consultants and directors.
The Equity Award Plan and Inducement Plan each have a stated term of
ten years
and provide that the exercise price of stock options granted will not be less than the market price of the common stock on the grant date. The Equity Award Plan and Inducement Plan do not specify grant dates or vesting schedules, as those determinations are delegated to the Compensation Committee of the board of directors. Each grant agreement reflects the vesting schedule for that particular grant, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to modify the vesting provisions of an award.
Non-cash compensation related to equity awards is included in the following line items in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
(in thousands)
:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||||
|
Cost of revenue
|
$
|
175
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
||
|
Selling and marketing expense
|
3,973
|
|
2,722
|
|
1,597
|
|
|||||
|
General and administrative expense
|
16,874
|
|
4,699
|
|
5,120
|
|
|||||
|
Product development
|
2,339
|
|
2,097
|
|
1,558
|
|
|||||
|
Restructuring and severance
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
138
|
|
|||||
|
Total non-cash compensation
|
$
|
23,361
|
|
$
|
9,647
|
|
$
|
8,508
|
|
||
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized
$9.5 million
,
$3.7 million
and
$3.0 million
of income tax benefit related to non-cash compensation. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $
12.9 million
of excess tax benefit, including state taxes, in income tax expense.
See
Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies—Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for additional information regarding excess tax benefits and deficiencies.
Stock Options
A summary of the changes in outstanding stock options is as follows:
|
Number of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(a)
|
|||||||||
|
(per option)
|
(in years)
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
1,991,802
|
|
$
|
21.23
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
112,059
|
|
207.79
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Exercised
|
(219,094
|
)
|
31.29
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Forfeited
|
(21,028
|
)
|
70.90
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
1,863,739
|
|
$
|
30.70
|
|
4.46
|
$
|
577,295
|
|
|||
|
Options exercisable
|
1,036,757
|
|
$
|
11.56
|
|
2.34
|
$
|
340,976
|
|
|||
|
(a)
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company's closing stock price of
$340.45
on the last trading day of
2017
and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares covered by in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holder had the option holder exercised these options on
December 31, 2017
. The intrinsic value changes based on the market value of the Company's common stock.
|
70
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of
December 31, 2017
, there was approximately
$12.1 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
0.6 years
.
Upon exercise, the intrinsic value represents the pre-tax difference between the Company's closing stock price on the exercise date and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of stock options exercised. During the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
, the total intrinsic value of stock options that were exercised was
$27.7 million
,
$0.3 million
and
$5.9 million
, respectively. Cash received from stock option exercises and the related actual tax benefit realized were
$6.9 million
and
$11.3 million
, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2017
.
During the years ended December 31,
2017
,
2016
and 2015, the Company granted stock options with a weighted average grant date fair value per share of
$105.15
,
$40.05
, and
$27.60
, respectively, of which the vesting periods include (a) immediately upon grant, (b)
five months
from the grant date, (c)
one year
from the grant date, (d)
50%
over a period of
two years
from the grant date, (e)
25%
and
75%
over a period of
1.7 years
and
2.7 years
, respectively, (f)
33%
over a period of
three years
from the grant date, (g)
25%
and
75%
over a period of
two years
and
three years
, respectively, (h)
four years
from the grant date and (i)
25%
over a period of
four years
from the grant date.
For purposes of determining stock-based compensation expense, the weighted average grant date fair value per share of the stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of various key assumptions. The weighted average assumptions used are as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||
|
Expected term
(1)
|
5.00 - 7.00 years
|
|
5.22 - 6.38 years
|
|
5.21 - 6.23 years
|
|
|
Expected dividend
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Expected volatility
(3)
|
51% - 52%
|
|
48% - 53%
|
|
38% - 48%
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
(4)
|
1.74% - 2.24%
|
|
1.10% - 2.18%
|
|
1.65% - 2.01%
|
|
|
(1)
|
The expected term of stock options granted was calculated using the 'Simplified Method', which utilizes the midpoint between the weighted average time of vesting and the end of the contractual term. This method was utilized for the stock options due to a lack of historical exercise behavior by the Company's employees.
|
|
(2)
|
For all stock options granted during the years ended December 31,
2017
,
2016
and 2015, no dividends are expected to be paid over the contractual term of the stock options, resulting in a zero expected dividend rate.
|
|
(3)
|
The expected volatility rate is based on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
The risk-free interest rate is specific to the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields for notes with comparable expected terms as the awards, in effect at the grant date.
|
During the years ended December 31,
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, the total fair value of options vested was
$4.1 million
,
$0.9 million
and
$0.8 million
, respectively.
Stock Options with Performance Conditions
During 2017, the Company granted stock options with performance conditions with a weighted average grant date fair value per share of
$152.45
, of which vesting periods range from
1.2 years
to
2.2 years
, pending the attainment of certain performance targets set at the time of grant.
71
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of the changes in outstanding stock options with performance conditions is as follows:
|
Number of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(a)
|
|||||||||
|
(per option)
|
(in years)
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Granted
|
37,877
|
|
308.90
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Exercised
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
37,877
|
|
$
|
308.90
|
|
9.95
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|||
|
Options exercisable
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
0.00
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
(a)
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company's closing stock price of
$340.45
on the last trading day of
2017
and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares covered by in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holder had the option holder exercised these options on
December 31, 2017
. The intrinsic value changes based on the market value of the Company's common stock.
|
As of
December 31, 2017
, there was approximately
$2.3 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options with performance conditions. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
1.6 years
.
As of December 31, 2017, the performance conditions associated with the performance-based nonqualified stock options had not been met.
For purposes of determining stock-based compensation expense, the weighted average grant date fair value per share of the stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of various key assumptions. The weighted average assumptions used are as follows:
|
Expected term
(1)
|
5.5 - 6.00 years
|
|
|
Expected dividend
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
Expected volatility
(3)
|
51%
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
(4)
|
2.16% - 2.23%
|
|
|
(1)
|
The expected term of stock options granted was calculated using the 'Simplified Method', which utilizes the midpoint between the weighted average time of vesting and the end of the contractual term. This method was utilized for the stock options due to a lack of historical exercise behavior by the Company's employees.
|
|
(2)
|
For all stock options granted during the year ended December 31,
2017
, no dividends are expected to be paid over the contractual term of the stock options, resulting in a zero expected dividend rate.
|
|
(3)
|
The expected volatility rate is based on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
The risk-free interest rate is specific to the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields for notes with comparable expected terms as the awards, in effect at the grant date.
|
72
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the changes in outstanding nonvested RSUs is as follows:
|
|
RSUs
|
|||||
|
|
Number of Units
|
Weighted Average Grant Date
Fair Value
|
||||
|
(per unit)
|
||||||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2016
|
152,374
|
|
$
|
65.64
|
|
|
|
Granted
(a)
|
94,783
|
|
152.45
|
|
||
|
Vested
|
(78,631
|
)
|
57.92
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
(15,697
|
)
|
82.99
|
|
||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2017
|
152,829
|
|
$
|
121.68
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The grant date fair value per share of the RSUs is calculated as the closing market price of LendingTree's common stock at the time of grant.
|
As of
December 31, 2017
, there was approximately
$13.9 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
1.8 years
.
The total fair value of RSUs that vested during the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
was
$11.5 million
,
$10.1 million
and
$11.0 million
, respectively.
Restricted Stock
A summary of the changes in outstanding nonvested restricted stock is as follows:
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|||||
|
|
Number of Shares
|
Weighted Average Grant Date
Fair Value
|
||||
|
(per share)
|
||||||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2016
|
14,464
|
|
$
|
25.14
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Vested
|
(14,464
|
)
|
25.14
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2017
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
was
$2.1 million
,
$3.9 million
and
$4.1 million
, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units with Performance Conditions
During 2017 and 2016, the Company granted RSUs with performance conditions to certain employees, of which vesting periods range from
0.33 years
to
4.00 years
, pending the attainment of certain performance targets set at the time of grant.
73
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of the changes in outstanding nonvested RSUs with performance conditions is as follows:
|
|
RSUs with Performance Conditions
|
|||||
|
|
Number of Units
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
||||
|
(per unit)
|
||||||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2016
|
44,509
|
|
$
|
88.28
|
|
|
|
Granted
(a)
|
80,880
|
|
186.85
|
|
||
|
Vested
|
(1,931
|
)
|
96.46
|
|
||
|
Forfeited
|
(12,253
|
)
|
83.60
|
|
||
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2017
|
111,205
|
|
$
|
160.34
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The grant date fair value per share of the RSUs with performance conditions is calculated as the closing market price of LendingTree's common stock at the time of grant.
|
As of
December 31, 2017
, there was approximately
$13.5 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs with performance conditions. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
1.7 years
.
The total fair value of RSUs with performance conditions that vested during the years ended
December 31, 2017
and
2016
was
$0.4 million
and
$0.2 million
, respectively.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Grants
On July 25, 2017, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved new compensation arrangements for its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The new compensation arrangements include the issuance of performance based equity compensation grants with a modeled total grant date value of
$87.5 million
of which
25%
(
119,015
shares) would be in the form of time-vested restricted stock awards with a performance condition and
75%
(a maximum of
769,376
shares) would be in the form of performance-based nonqualified stock options.
Stock Options with Market Conditions
The performance-based nonqualified stock options have a target number of shares that vest upon achieving targeted total shareholder return performance of
110%
stock price appreciation and a maximum number of shares for achieving superior performance up to
167%
of the target number of shares. No shares will vest unless
70%
of the targeted performance is achieved. Time-based service vesting conditions would also have to be satisfied in order for performance-vested shares to become fully vested and no longer subject to forfeiture. In connection with the new compensation arrangements, on July 26, 2017, an initial grant of performance-based nonqualified stock options with a target number of shares of
402,694
and a maximum number of shares of
672,499
were issued with an exercise price of
$183.80
, the closing stock price on July 26, 2017. The fair value of the performance-based stock options will be recognized on a straight-line basis through the vest date of September 30, 2022, whether or not any of the total shareholder return targets are met. In the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded
$4.8 million
in stock-based compensation expense related to these stock options in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
The Company's Equity Award Plan imposes a per employee upper annual grant limit of
672,500
shares. As a result, the remaining
58,010
target performance-based nonqualified stock options and potential performance-based restricted stock awards were awarded on January 2, 2018. The form of the awards consisted of
31,336
performance-based nonqualified stock options with a per share exercise price of
$340.25
, and
26,674
performance-based restricted stock awards, substituting for an equal number of the performance-based options, to compensate for the increase in the exercise price of the performance-based option granted on July 26, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the Company estimated the fair value of the remaining
58,010
target shares using a Monte Carlo simulation model and the Company's common stock price on December 31, 2017 to record mark-to-market expense associated with the commitment to issue the shares on January 2, 2018. In the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded
$1.0 million
in stock-based compensation expense related to these stock options based on the current estimated fair value on a straight-line basis.
As of December 31, 2017, performance-based nonqualified stock options of
167,742
and performance-based restricted stock awards of
10,309
had been earned, which have a vest date of September 30, 2022.
74
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of changes in outstanding stock options with market conditions is as follows:
|
|
Number of Options with Market Conditions
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(a)
|
||||||||
|
|
|
(per option)
|
(in years)
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Granted
(b)
|
402,694
|
|
183.80
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Exercised
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
402,694
|
|
183.80
|
|
9.57
|
$
|
63,082
|
|
||||
|
Options exercisable
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
0.00
|
$
|
—
|
|
|||
|
(a)
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company's closing stock price of
$340.45
on the last trading day of 2017 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares covered by in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holder had the option holder exercised these options on December 31, 2017. The intrinsic value changes based on the market value of the Company's common stock.
|
|
(b)
|
During 2017, the Company granted stock options with a grant date fair value per share of
$142.45
, calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation model, which have a vesting date of September 30, 2022.
|
For purposes of determining stock-based compensation expense, the grant date fair value per share of the stock options was estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation model, which requires the use of various key assumptions. The assumptions used are as follows:
|
Expected term
(1)
|
7.50 years
|
|
|
Expected dividend
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
Expected volatility
(3)
|
50%
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
(4)
|
2.12%
|
|
|
(1)
|
The expected term of stock options with a market condition granted was calculated using the midpoint between the weighted average time of vesting and the end of the contractual term.
|
|
(2)
|
For all stock options with a market condition granted in 2017, no dividends are expected to be paid over the contractual term of the stock options, resulting in a zero expected dividend rate.
|
|
(3)
|
The expected volatility rate is based on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock.
|
|
(4)
|
The risk-free interest rate is specific to the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields for notes with comparable expected terms as the awards, in effect at the grant date.
|
As of
December 31, 2017
, there was approximately
$52.6 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options with market conditions. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
4.8 years
.
Time-Vested Restricted Stock Awards with Performance Conditions
On January 2, 2018,
119,015
restricted stock awards with time-vesting and a performance condition were granted. The terms of these awards were fixed in the approved new compensation agreements in July 2017. In 2017, the Company recorded
$3.1 million
in stock-based compensation to reflect the commitment to issue the shares in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. The performance condition is tied to the Company's operating results during the first six months of 2018. As of December 31, 2017, the performance condition associated with the awards had not been met.
75
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
10
—INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Provision
The components of the income tax expense (benefit) are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Current income tax expense:
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
10,055
|
|
$
|
11,519
|
|
$
|
5,847
|
|
||
|
State
|
2,606
|
|
2,480
|
|
1,149
|
|
|||||
|
Current income tax expense
|
12,661
|
|
13,999
|
|
6,996
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision:
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Federal
|
(3,805
|
)
|
3,703
|
|
(19,676
|
)
|
|||||
|
State
|
(2,565
|
)
|
2,664
|
|
(10,293
|
)
|
|||||
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision
|
(6,370
|
)
|
6,367
|
|
(29,969
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
6,291
|
|
$
|
20,366
|
|
$
|
(22,973
|
)
|
||
A reconciliation of the income tax expense (benefit) to the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes is shown as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Income tax expense at the federal statutory rate of 35%
|
$
|
8,998
|
|
$
|
18,051
|
|
$
|
9,920
|
|
||
|
State income taxes, net of effect of federal tax benefit
|
(268
|
)
|
4,038
|
|
1,480
|
|
|||||
|
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
|
9,062
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Excess Tax Deductions on Non-Cash Compensation
|
(11,134
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Change in (release of) valuation allowance
|
593
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
(34,409
|
)
|
||||
|
Research and experimentation tax credit
|
(1,318
|
)
|
(2,574
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other, net
|
358
|
|
1,267
|
|
36
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
6,291
|
|
$
|
20,366
|
|
$
|
(22,973
|
)
|
||
During the fourth quarter of 2017, LendingTree recorded a net tax expense of
$9.1 million
related to the enactment of the TCJA. The expense is primarily related to the remeasurement of LendingTree’s deferred tax assets and liabilities considering the TCJA’s newly enacted tax rates and certain other impacts. The determination of valuation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities related to the TCJA is provisional and is subject to adjustment during a measurement period of up to one year following the December 2017 enactment of the TCJA, as provided by recent SEC guidance.
76
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Deferred Income Taxes
The tax effects of cumulative temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Provision for accrued expenses
|
$
|
4,368
|
|
$
|
8,056
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
(a)
|
6,296
|
|
8,548
|
|
|||
|
Non-cash compensation expense
|
8,929
|
|
5,699
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
|
1,825
|
|
|||
|
Contingent liabilities
|
6,666
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Other
|
2,138
|
|
139
|
|
|||
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
28,397
|
|
24,267
|
|
|||
|
Less: valuation allowance
(b)
|
(2,694
|
)
|
(2,101
|
)
|
|||
|
Total deferred tax assets, net of the valuation allowance
|
25,703
|
|
22,166
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Intangible and other assets
|
(1,960
|
)
|
(2,704
|
)
|
|||
|
Other
|
(1,160
|
)
|
(1,071
|
)
|
|||
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
(3,120
|
)
|
(3,775
|
)
|
|||
|
Net deferred taxes
|
$
|
22,583
|
|
$
|
18,391
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
At
December 31, 2017
, the Company had pre-tax consolidated federal net operating losses ("NOLs") of
$5.8 million
. The federal NOLs will expire in 2030. The Company's NOLs will be available to offset taxable income (until such NOLs are either used or expire) subject to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 annual limitation. In addition, the Company has state NOLs of approximately
$190.4 million
at
December 31, 2017
that will expire at various times between 2018 and 2038.
|
|
(b)
|
The valuation allowance is related to items for which it is
"more likely than not"
that the tax benefit will not be realized.
|
Deferred income taxes are presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
$
|
20,156
|
|
$
|
14,610
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
|
2,427
|
|
3,781
|
|
|||
|
Net deferred taxes
|
$
|
22,583
|
|
$
|
18,391
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance
A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is
"more likely than not"
that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. As of each reporting date, management considers both positive and negative evidence regarding the likelihood of future realization of the deferred tax assets.
In the fourth quarter of 2015 the Company concluded, based upon all available evidence, it was more likely than not it would have sufficient future taxable income to realize the majority of its net deferred tax assets. As a result, the Company released the majority of the valuation allowance in 2015. The Company significantly improved its operating performance in 2015, emerged from cumulative losses in previous years due to a cumulative profit position and projects taxable income in future years. While the Company believes the assumptions included in its projections of future taxable income are reasonable, if the actual results vary from expected results due to unforeseen changes in the economy or mortgage industry, or other factors, the Company may need to make future adjustments to the valuation allowance for all, or a portion, of the net deferred tax assets. At December 31, 2017
77
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and 2016, the Company recorded a partial valuation allowance of
$2.7 million
and
$2.1 million
, respectively, primarily related to state net operating losses, which the Company does not expect to be able to utilize prior to expiration.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the deferred tax valuation allowance is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Balance, beginning of the period
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
$
|
40,121
|
|
||
|
Charges to earnings
(a)
|
593
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
(37,780
|
)
|
||||
|
Balance, end of the period
|
$
|
2,694
|
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
||
(a) During 2015, the amount is primarily related to the Company's release of the valuation allowance, current year utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, the write-off of certain state net operating losses that expire in 2015 and state net operating losses not expected to be utilized in future years due to changes in ownership limitations.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|||||
|
Balance, beginning of the period
|
$
|
550
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions of the current year
|
198
|
|
550
|
|
|||
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
—
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|||
|
Balance, end of the period
|
$
|
748
|
|
$
|
550
|
|
|
Interest and, if applicable, penalties are recognized related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of
$0.1 million
which was included in income tax expense. Interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits included in income tax expense for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was immaterial.
As of
December 31, 2017
, the accrual for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, was
$0.7 million
, which would benefit the effective tax rate if recognized. As of December 31, 2016, the accrual for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, was
$0.6 million
, which would benefit the effective tax rate if recognized.
Tax Audits
LendingTree is subject to audits by federal, state and local authorities in the area of income tax. These audits include questioning the timing and the amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. Income taxes payable include amounts considered sufficient to pay assessments that may result from examination of prior year returns; however, any amounts paid upon resolution of issues raised may differ from the amount provided. Differences between the reserves for tax contingencies and the amounts owed by the Company are recorded in the period they become known. As of December 31, 2017, the Company is subject to a federal income tax examination for the tax years 2013 through 2016. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local tax examinations for the tax years 2013 through 2016.
NOTE
11
—DEBT
Convertible Senior Notes
On May 31, 2017, the Company issued
$300.0 million
aggregate principal amount of its
0.625%
Convertible Senior Notes due June 1, 2022 (the “Notes”) in a private placement. The Notes bear interest at a rate of
0.625%
per year, payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning on December 1, 2017. The Notes will mature on June 1, 2022, unless earlier repurchased or converted.
78
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The initial conversion rate of the Notes is
4.8163
shares of Common Stock per
$1,000
principal amount of Notes (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately
$207.63
per share). The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain specified events but will not be adjusted for accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change prior to the maturity of the Notes, the Company will, in certain circumstances, increase the conversion rate by a specified number of additional shares for a holder that elects to convert the Notes in connection with such fundamental change. Upon conversion, the Notes will settle for cash, shares of the Company’s stock, or a combination thereof, at the Company’s option. It is the intent of the Company to settle the principal amount of the Notes in cash and any conversion premium in shares of its common stock.
The Notes are the Company’s senior unsecured obligations and will rank senior in right of payment to any of the Company’s indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes; equal in right of payment to any of the Company’s unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness, including borrowings under the senior secured Revolving Credit Facility, described below, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of the Company’s subsidiaries.
Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding February 1, 2022, the Notes will be convertible at the option of the holders thereof only under the following circumstances:
|
•
|
during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on September 30, 2017 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on, and including the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to
130%
of the conversion price on each applicable trading day;
|
|
•
|
during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which, for each trading day of that period, the trading price (as defined in the Notes) per
$1,000
principal amount of Notes for such trading day was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Common Stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; or
|
|
•
|
upon the occurrence of specified corporate events including but not limited to a fundamental change.
|
Holders of the Notes became entitled to convert the Notes on January 1, 2018, and will continue to have such right until March 31, 2018, based on the last reported sales price of our common stock, for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on December 31, 2017, being greater than or equal to
130%
of the conversion price of the Notes on each applicable trading day.
On or after February 1, 2022, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date of the Notes, holders of the Notes may convert all or a portion of their Notes regardless of the foregoing conditions.
The Company may not redeem the Notes prior to the maturity date and no sinking fund is provided for the Notes. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change prior to the maturity date of the Notes, holders of the Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the Notes for cash at a price equal to
100%
of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date.
If the market price per share of the Common Stock, as measured under the terms of the Notes, exceeds the conversion price of the Notes, the Notes could have a dilutive effect, unless the Company elects, subject to certain conditions, to settle the principal amount of the Notes and any conversion premium in cash.
The initial measurement of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash are separated into a debt and equity component whereby the debt component is based on the fair value of a similar instrument that does not contain an equity conversion option. The separate components of debt and equity of the Company’s Notes were determined using an interest rate of
5.36%
, which reflects the nonconvertible debt borrowing rate of the Company at the date of issuance. As a result, the initial components of debt and equity were
$238.4 million
and
$61.6 million
, respectively.
During 2017, the Company recorded interest expense on the Notes of
$8.2 million
which consisted of
$1.1 million
associated with the
0.625%
coupon rate,
$6.4 million
associated with the accretion of the debt discount, and
$0.7 million
associated with the amortization of the debt issuance costs. The debt discount will be amortized over the term of the debt.
79
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financing costs related to the issuance of the Notes were approximately
$9.3 million
of which
$7.4 million
were allocated to the liability component and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the debt and
$1.9 million
were allocated to the equity component.
As of December 31, 2017, the fair value of the Notes is estimated to be approximately
$522.6 million
using the Level 1 observable input of the last quoted market price on December 29, 2017.
A summary of the gross carrying amount, unamortized debt cost, debt issuance costs and net carrying value of the liability component of the Notes are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
December 31,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
|||||
|
Gross carrying amount
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Unamortized debt discount
|
55,202
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Debt issuance costs
|
6,599
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Net carrying amount
|
$
|
238,199
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant Transactions
On May 31, 2017, in connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company entered into Convertible Note Hedge (the “Hedge”) and Warrant transactions with respect to the Company’s common stock. The Company used approximately
$18.1 million
of the net proceeds from the Notes to pay for the cost of the Hedge, after such cost was partially offset by the proceeds from the Warrant transactions.
On May 31, 2017, the Company paid
$61.5 million
to the counterparties for the Hedge transactions. The Hedge transactions cover approximately
1.4 million
shares of the Company’s common stock, the same number of shares initially underlying the Notes, and are exercisable upon any conversion of the Notes. The Hedge Transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution to the Common Stock upon conversion of the Notes and/or offset any cash payments the Company is required to make in excess of the principal amount of the converted Notes, as the case may be, in the event that the market price per share of Common Stock, as measured under the terms of the Hedge transactions, is greater than the strike price of the Hedge transactions, which initially corresponds to the initial conversion price of the Notes, or approximately
$207.63
per share of Common Stock. The Hedge transactions will expire upon the maturity of the Notes.
On May 31, 2017, the Company sold to the counterparties, warrants (the "Warrants") to acquire
1.4 million
shares of Common Stock at an initial strike price of
$266.39
per share, which represents a premium of
70%
over the reported sale price of the Common Stock of
$156.70
on May 24, 2017. On May 31, 2017, the Company received aggregate proceeds of approximately
$43.4 million
from the sale of the Warrants.
If the market price per share of the Common Stock, as measured under the terms of the Warrants, exceeds the strike price of the Warrants, the Warrants could have a dilutive effect, unless the Company elects, subject to certain conditions, to settle the Warrants in cash.
The Hedge and Warrant transactions are indexed to, and potentially settled in, the Company's common stock and the net cost of
$18.1 million
has been recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity.
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
On November 21, 2017, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, LendingTree, LLC, entered into an amended and restated
$250.0 million
five
-year senior secured revolving credit facility which matures on November 21, 2022 (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility replaced the Company's previous
$125.0 million
revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility can be used to finance working capital needs, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes, including to finance permitted acquisitions. As of
December 31, 2017
, the Company does not have any borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Up to
$10.0 million
of the Revolving Credit Facility will be available for short-term loans, referred to as swingline loans. Additionally, up to
$10.0 million
of the Revolving Credit Facility will be available for the issuance of letters of credit. Under certain conditions, the Company will be permitted to add one or more term loans and/or increase revolving commitments under
80
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
the Revolving Credit Facility by an additional
$100.0 million
, or a greater amount provided that a total consolidated senior secured debt to EBITDA ratio does not exceed
2.50
to 1.00.
The Company’s borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at annual rates that, at the Company’s option, will be either:
|
•
|
a base rate generally defined as the sum of (i) the greater of (a) the prime rate of SunTrust Bank, (b) the federal funds effective rate plus
0.5%
and (c) the LIBO rate (defined below) on a daily basis applicable for an interest period of one month plus
1.0%
and (ii) an applicable percentage of
0.25%
to
1.0%
based on a total consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio; or
|
|
•
|
a LIBO rate generally defined as the sum of (i) the rate for Eurodollar deposits in the applicable currency and (ii) an applicable percentage of
1.25%
to
2.0%
based on a total consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio.
|
All swingline loans bear interest at the base rate defined above. Interest on the Company’s borrowings are payable quarterly in arrears for base rate loans and on the last day of each interest rate period (but not less often than three months) for LIBO rate loans.
The Revolving Credit Facility contains a restrictive financial covenant, which initially limits the total consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio to
4.5
, with step downs to
4.0
over time, except that this may increase by
0.5
for the four fiscal quarters following a material acquisition. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants in addition to events of default for a transaction of this type that, among other things, restrict additional indebtedness, liens, mergers or certain fundamental changes, asset dispositions, dividends, stock repurchases and other restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, sale-leaseback transactions, hedging transactions, loans and investments and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2017.
The Revolving Credit Facility requires LendingTree, LLC to pledge as collateral, subject to certain customary exclusions, substantially all of its assets, including
100%
of its equity in all of its domestic subsidiaries and
66%
of the voting equity, and
100%
of the non-voting equity, in all of its material foreign subsidiaries (of which there are currently none). The obligations under this facility are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by LendingTree, Inc. and material domestic subsidiaries of LendingTree, LLC, which guaranties are secured by a pledge as collateral, subject to certain customary exclusions, of
100%
of each such guarantor's assets, including
100%
of each such guarantor’s equity in all of its domestic subsidiaries and
66%
of the voting equity, and
100%
of the non-voting equity, in all of its material foreign subsidiaries (of which there are currently none).
The Company is required to pay an unused commitment fee quarterly in arrears on the difference between committed amounts and amounts actually borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility equal to an applicable percentage of
0.25%
to
0.45%
per annum based on a total consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio. The Company is required to pay a letter of credit participation fee and a letter of credit fronting fee quarterly in arrears. The letter of credit participation fee is based upon the aggregate face amount of outstanding letters of credit at an applicable percentage of
1.25%
to
2.0%
based on a total consolidated debt to EBITDA ratio. The letter of credit fronting fee is
0.125%
per annum on the face amount of each letter of credit.
The Company recognized
$0.1 million
in additional interest expense in the fourth quarter of 2017 due to the write-off of certain unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the original revolving credit facility entered into on October 22, 2015. In addition to the remaining unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the original revolving credit facility, debt issuance costs of
$1.4 million
related to the Revolving Credit Facility are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the Revolving Credit Facility of
five years
, and are included in prepaid and other current assets and other non-current assets in the Company's consolidated balance sheet.
NOTE
12
—COMMITMENTS
Operating Leases
The Company leases office space used in connection with its operations under various operating leases, which contain escalation clauses. The Company's operating leases relate to its office space in: Charlotte, North Carolina; Burlingame, California; Charleston, South Carolina; New York City, New York; and Northbrook, Illinois.
81
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Future minimum payments as of
December 31, 2017
under operating lease agreements having an initial or remaining non-cancelable lease term in excess of
one year
are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
Year ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
|
2018
|
$
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
2019
|
1,811
|
|
||
|
2020
|
1,389
|
|
||
|
2021
|
63
|
|
||
|
2022
|
59
|
|
||
|
Total
|
$
|
5,076
|
|
|
Rental expense for all operating leases, except those with terms of a month or less that were not renewed, charged to continuing operations was
$2.0 million
,
$1.6 million
and
$1.2 million
, for each of the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively, and a majority of which is included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Bonds
The Company has funding commitments that could potentially require performance in the event of demands by third parties or contingent events, as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Commitments Due By Period
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
Less Than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More Than
5 years
|
||||||||||||||
|
Surety bonds
(a)
|
$
|
4,393
|
|
$
|
4,368
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Litigation bonds
(b)
|
140
|
|
140
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
4,533
|
|
$
|
4,508
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||
(a) State laws and regulations generally require businesses which engage in mortgage brokering activity to maintain a mortgage broker or similar license. Mortgage brokering activity is generally defined to include, among other things, receiving valuable consideration for offering assistance to a buyer in obtaining a residential mortgage or soliciting financial and mortgage information from the public and providing that information to an originator of residential mortgage loans. All states require that the Company maintain surety bonds for potential claims.
(b) Bonds required for certain legal matters.
Other Commitments
The Company has certain other commitments through 2020, where the commitments for these contracts range from
$2.8 million
to
$4.3 million
each year throughout the life of the contract.
NOTE
13
—CONTINGENCIES
Overview
LendingTree is involved in legal proceedings on an ongoing basis. In assessing the materiality of a legal proceeding, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the amount of monetary damages claimed, as well as the potential impact of non-monetary remedies sought by plaintiffs (e.g., injunctive relief) that may require it to change its business practices in a manner that could have a material and adverse impact on the business. With respect to the matters disclosed in this Note
13
, unless otherwise indicated, the Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of losses that could potentially result from the application of such non-monetary remedies.
As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company had a litigation settlement accrual of
$0.3 million
and
$0.7 million
, respectively, in continuing operations and
$4.0 million
and
$4.0 million
, respectively, in discontinued operations. The litigation settlement accrual relates to litigation matters that were either settled or a firm offer for settlement was extended, thereby establishing an accrual amount that is both probable and reasonably estimable.
82
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Specific Matters
Intellectual Property Litigation
Zillow
LendingTree v. Zillow, Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-439
. On September 8, 2010, the Company filed an action for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina against Zillow, Inc., Nextag, Inc., Quinstreet, Inc., Quinstreet Media, Inc. and Adchemy, Inc. The complaint was amended to include Leadpoint, Inc. d/b/a Securerights on September 24, 2010. The complaint alleged that each of the defendants infringed
one
or both of the Company's patents—U.S. Patent No. 6,385,594, entitled "Method and Computer Network for Co-Ordinating a Loan over the Internet," and U.S. Patent No. 6,611,816, entitled "Method and Computer Network for Co-Ordinating a Loan over the Internet." The defendants in this action asserted various defenses and counterclaims against the Company, including the assertion by certain of the defendants of counterclaims alleging illegal monopolization via the Company's maintenance of the asserted patents. Defendant NexTag asserted defenses of laches and equitable estoppel. In July 2011, the Company reached a settlement agreement with Leadpoint, Inc., pursuant to which all claims against Leadpoint, Inc. and all counterclaims against the Company by Leadpoint, Inc. were dismissed. In November 2012, the Company reached a settlement agreement with Quinstreet, Inc. and Quinstreet Media, Inc. (collectively, the "Quinstreet Parties"), pursuant to which all claims against the Quinstreet Parties and all counterclaims against the Company by the Quinstreet Parties were dismissed. After an unsuccessful attempt to reach settlement through mediation with the remaining parties, this matter went to trial beginning in February 2014, and on March 12, 2014, the jury returned a verdict. The jury found that the defendants Zillow, Inc., Adchemy, Inc., and NexTag, Inc. did not infringe the
two
patents referenced above and determined that those patents are invalid due to an inventorship defect, and the court found that NexTag was entitled to defenses of laches and equitable estoppel. The jury found in the Company’s favor on the defendants' counterclaims alleging inequitable conduct and antitrust violations. Judgment was entered on March 31, 2014. After the court entered judgment, on May 27, 2014, the Company reached a settlement agreement with defendant Adchemy, Inc., including an agreement to dismiss and withdraw all claims, counterclaims, and motions between the Company and Adchemy, Inc. As a result, a joint and voluntary dismissal was filed June 12, 2014 with respect to claims between the Company and Adchemy. The parties filed various post-trial motions; in particular, defendants collectively sought up to
$9.7 million
in fees and costs. On October 9, 2014, the court denied the Company's post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and denied Zillow's post-trial motions for sanctions and attorneys' fees. The court also denied in part and granted in part NexTag's post-trial motion for attorneys' fees, awarding NexTag a portion of its attorneys' fees and costs totaling
$2.3 million
, plus interest.
In November 2014, the Company filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with respect to the jury verdict concerning Zillow, Inc. and Nextag, Inc. and the award of attorneys' fees. In March 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted the Company's motion to stay appellate briefing pending an
en banc
review by such court of the laches defense in an unrelated patent infringement matter and ruled in favor of Zillow, Inc. on an immaterial amount of costs related to the trial process. In June 2015, the Company reached a settlement agreement for
$1.1 million
with defendant NexTag pursuant to which the Company dismissed its appeal of the jury verdict and the award of attorney's fees concerning NexTag, and NexTag dismissed its cross-appeal and claims relating to the jury verdict and the award of attorneys' fees. In July 2015, the stay was lifted on the Company's appeal with respect to the jury verdict concerning Zillow, Inc. The appeal was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in June 2016, and in July 2016 the Court determined that certain of the claims of the two patents referenced above were directed to ineligible subject matter and thus such claims were invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 101. With respect to the remaining claims that the Court did not hold were ineligible, the Court granted a remand to the federal district court to allow LendingTree to file a motion to vacate the judgment of invalidity for incorrect inventorship.
In June 2017, the Federal District Court vacated the invalidity judgment arising from the March 2014 jury verdict. As a result, certain claims of the Company's
two
issued patents remain valid. The case is now closed and the Company expects no further significant events regarding this litigation.
Legal Matters
Next Advisor Continued, Inc.
Next Advisor Continued, Inc. v. LendingTree, Inc. and LendingTree, LLC, No. 15-cvs-20775 (N.C. Super. Ct.).
On November 6, 2015, the plaintiff filed this action against LendingTree, Inc. and LendingTree, LLC (together “LendingTree”). The plaintiff generally alleges that LendingTree breached a non-disclosure agreement and misappropriated trade secrets in the context of a potential business acquisition of the plaintiff by LendingTree. Based upon these allegations, the plaintiff asserts claims for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and violation of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The plaintiff requested money damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief.
83
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On December 16, 2015, LendingTree filed its answer to the plaintiff's complaint, denying the material allegations and asserting numerous defenses thereto. In June 2016, the Court granted plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and temporarily ordered, pending trial, that LendingTree cease any utilization of confidential and trade secret information of plaintiff and cease marketing credit card products via certain third party content marketing platforms. However, LendingTree continued to believe that the plaintiff's allegations lacked merit and vigorously defended the case. In July 2016, LendingTree filed a notice of interlocutory appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court with respect to the preliminary injunction, but the interlocutory appeal was dismissed in December 2016. In February 2017, LendingTree filed a motion for partial summary judgment. In June 2017, the court granted LendingTree's motion for partial summary judgment, restricting the duration of any injunction and ruling that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover compensatory damages on any of its claims. On September 14, 2017, LendingTree and the plaintiff finalized a settlement agreement pursuant to which (i) LendingTree defrayed a portion of plaintiff’s litigation costs, and (ii) the parties agreed that the injunction would be of no further effect as of January 3, 2018. The Court’s order approving the settlement was a final judgment and this matter is now closed.
Litigation Related to Discontinued Operations
Residential Funding Company
Residential Funding Company, LLC v Home Loan Center, Inc., No. 13-cv-3451 (U.S. Dist. Ct., Minn.).
On or about December 16, 2013, Home Loan Center, Inc. was served in the above captioned matter. Generally, Residential Funding Company, LLC ("RFC") seeks damages for breach of contract and indemnification for certain residential mortgage loans as well as residential mortgage-backed securitizations ("RMBS") containing mortgage loans. RFC asserts that, beginning in 2008, RFC faced massive repurchase demands and lawsuits from purchasers or insurers of the loans and RMBS that RFC had sold. RFC filed for bankruptcy protection in May 2012. Plaintiff alleges that, after RFC filed for Chapter 11 protection, hundreds of proofs of claim were filed, many of which mirrored the litigation filed against RFC prior to its bankruptcy.
In December 2013, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York entered an Order confirming the Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Residential Capital, LLC et al. and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. Plaintiff then began filing substantially similar complaints against approximately
80
of the loan originators from whom RFC had purchased loans, including Home Loan Center, in federal and state courts in Minnesota and New York. In each case, Plaintiff claims that the defendant is liable for a portion of the global settlement in RFC’s bankruptcy.
Plaintiff asserts
two
claims against HLC: (1) breach of contract based on HLC’s alleged breach of representations and warranties concerning the quality and characteristics of the mortgage loans it sold to RFC (Count One); and (2) contractual indemnification for alleged liabilities, losses, and damages incurred by RFC arising out of purported defects in loans that RFC purchased from HSBC and sold to third parties (Count Two). Plaintiff alleges that the “types of defects” contained in the loans it purchased from HLC included “income misrepresentation, employment misrepresentation, appraisal misrepresentations or inaccuracies, undisclosed debt, and missing or inaccurate documents.”
HLC filed a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, in the alternative, a Motion for More Definite Statement under Rule 12(e). On June 25, 2015 the judge denied HLC's motion.
On July 9, 2015, HLC filed its answer to RFC’s complaint, denying the material allegations of the complaint and asserting numerous defenses thereto. Discovery is ongoing in this matter. Plaintiff is seeking damages of
$61.0 million
in this action; HLC intends to vigorously defend this action. An estimated liability of
$3.0 million
for this matter is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. v. 1
st
Advantage Mortgage, LLC et al., Case No. 08-13555 (SCC), Adversary Proceeding No. 16-01342 (SCC) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.).
In February 2016, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”) filed an Adversary Complaint against Home Loan Center and approximately
149
other defendants (the “Complaint”). The Complaint generally seeks (1) a declaratory judgment that the settlements entered by LBHI with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as part of LBHI’s bankruptcy proceedings gave rise to LBHI’s contractual indemnification claims against defendants alleged in the Complaint; (2) indemnification from HLC and the other defendants for losses allegedly incurred by LBHI in respect of defective mortgage loans sold by defendants to LBHI or its affiliates; and (3) interest, attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by LBHI in the litigation. On March 31, 2017, HLC filed an omnibus motion to dismiss with other defendants. HLC intends to defend this action vigorously. HLC had previously received a demand letter (the “Letter”) from LBHI in December 2014 with respect to
64
loans (the “Loans”) that LBHI alleges were sold by HLC to Lehman Brothers Bank FSB (“LBB”) between 2004 and 2008 pursuant to a loan purchase agreement (the “LPA”) between HLC and LBB. The Letter generally sought indemnification from HLC in accordance with the LPA for certain
84
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
claims that LBHI alleged it allowed in its bankruptcy with respect to the Loans. An estimated liability of
$1.0 million
for this matter is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2017
.
Other than the Notes and the Warrants, the carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments are equal to fair value at December 31, 2017.
See
Note
11
—Debt for additional information on the Notes and the Warrants.
Contingent consideration payments related to acquisitions are measured at fair value each reporting period using Level 3 unobservable inputs. The changes in the fair value of the Company's Level 3 liabilities during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Contingent Consideration
|
||
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Transfers into Level 3
|
—
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3
|
—
|
|
|
|
Total net (gains) losses included in earnings (realized and unrealized)
|
—
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales and settlements:
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
23,100
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
—
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
$
|
23,100
|
|
|
Transfers into Level 3
|
—
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3
|
—
|
|
|
|
Total net (gains) losses included in earnings (realized and unrealized)
|
23,931
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales and settlements:
|
|||
|
Additions
|
11,318
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
57,349
|
|
The contingent consideration liability at December 31, 2017 is the estimated fair value of the earnout payments of the CompareCards, DepositAccounts and SnapCap acquisitions. The contingent consideration liability at December 31, 2016 was the estimated fair value of the earnout payments of the CompareCards acquisition. The Company will make earnout payments ranging from
$22.5 million
to
$45.0 million
based on the achievement of certain defined earnings targets for CompareCards, payments ranging from
$1.0 million
to
$8.0 million
based on the achievement of defined milestone and performance targets for DepositAccounts, and payments ranging from
zero
to
$9.0 million
based on the achievement of certain defined earnings targets for SnapCap.
See
Note
6
—Business Acquisitions for additional information on the contingent consideration for each of these respective acquisitions. The significant unobservable inputs used to calculate the fair value of the contingent consideration are estimated future cash flows for the acquisitions, estimated date and likelihood of an increase in interest rates and the discount rate. Actual results will differ from the projected results and could have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of the contingent considerations. Additionally, as the liability is stated at present value, the passage of time alone will increase the estimated fair value of the liability each reporting period. Any changes in fair value will be recorded in operating income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
One
of the Company's board of directors also serves as a director to a marketing partner of the Company. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized
$1.2 million
,
$1.3 million
and
$0.7 million
, respectively, of expenses for this marketing partner through the normal course of business.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved a
$10.0 million
contribution to fund the newly formed LendingTree Foundation. Officers of the Company serve as officers of the LendingTree Foundation. The contribution is recorded in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
85
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company operates a retirement savings plan for its employees in the United States that is qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees are eligible to enroll in the plan upon date of hire. Participating employees may contribute up to
50%
of their pre-tax earnings, but not more than statutory limits (generally
$18,000
for
2015
through
2017
). The company match contribution is fifty cents for each dollar a participant contributes to the plan, with a maximum contribution of
6%
of a participant's eligible earnings. Matching contributions are invested in the same manner as each participant's voluntary contributions in the investment options provided under the plan. LendingTree stock is not included in the available investment options or the plan assets. Funds contributed to the plan vest according to the participant's years of service, with less than
three years
of service vesting at
0%
, and three years or more of service vesting at
100%
. Matching contributions were approximately
$0.9 million
,
$0.7 million
and
$0.5 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
NOTE
17
—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The revenue and net loss reported as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income are as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
(750
|
)
|
$
|
1,325
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
||
|
Loss before income taxes
|
$
|
(5,909
|
)
|
$
|
(5,728
|
)
|
$
|
(5,047
|
)
|
||
|
Income tax benefit
|
2,069
|
|
2,014
|
|
1,778
|
|
|||||
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(3,840
|
)
|
$
|
(3,714
|
)
|
$
|
(3,269
|
)
|
||
In 2017, 2016 and 2015, loss from discontinued operations was primarily due to litigation settlements and contingencies and legal fees associated with ongoing legal proceedings.
LendingTree Loans
On June 6, 2012, the Company sold substantially all of the operating assets of its LendingTree Loans business for
$55.9 million
in cash to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Financial Services ("Discover").
Discover generally did not assume liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business that arose before the closing date, except for certain liabilities directly related to assets Discover acquired. Of the purchase price paid, as of December 31, 2017,
$4.0 million
is being held in escrow in accordance with the agreement with Discover for certain loan loss obligations that remain with the Company following the sale. The escrowed amount is recorded as restricted cash at December 31, 2017.
Discover participated as a marketplace lender from closing of the transaction through July 2015.
Significant Assets and Liabilities of LendingTree Loans
Upon closing of the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of the LendingTree Loans business on June 6, 2012, LendingTree Loans ceased to originate consumer loans. Liability for losses on previously sold loans will remain with LendingTree Loans and are discussed below.
Loan Loss Obligations
LendingTree Loans sold loans it originated to investors on a servicing-released basis, so the risk of loss or default by the borrower was generally transferred to the investor. However, LendingTree Loans was required by these investors to make certain representations and warranties relating to credit information, loan documentation and collateral. These representations and warranties may extend through the contractual life of the loan. Subsequent to the loan sale, if underwriting deficiencies, borrower fraud or documentation defects are discovered in individual loans, LendingTree Loans may be obligated to repurchase the respective loan or indemnify the investors for any losses from borrower defaults if such deficiency or defect cannot be cured within the specified period following discovery.
86
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HLC, a subsidiary of the Company, continues to be liable for these indemnification obligations, repurchase obligations and premium repayment obligations following the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of its LendingTree Loans business in the second quarter of 2012.
The following table represents the aggregate loans sold, subsequent settlements and remaining unsettled loans as of December 31, 2017:
|
|
Number of Loans
|
Original Issue Balance
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands)
|
(in billions)
|
||||
|
Loans sold by HLC
|
234
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
Subsequent settlements
|
(172
|
)
|
(28.8
|
)
|
||
|
Remaining unsettled loans
|
62
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2015, LendingTree Loans completed a settlement agreement for
$0.6 million
with
one
of the investors to which it had sold loans. This investor accounted for approximately
10%
of the total number of loans sold and
12%
of the original issue balance. This settlement related to all existing and future losses on loans sold to this investor.
During the fourth quarter of 2014, LendingTree Loans completed a settlement agreement for
$5.4 million
with the largest investor to which it had sold loans. This investor accounted for approximately
40%
of both the total number of loans sold and the original issue balance. This settlement related to all existing and future losses on loans sold to this investor.
In the second quarter of 2014, LendingTree Loans completed settlements with
two
buyers of previously purchased loans.
The Company has been negotiating with certain of the remaining secondary market purchasers to settle any existing and future contingent liabilities, but it may not be able to complete such negotiations on acceptable terms, or at all. Because LendingTree Loans does not service the loans it sold, it does not maintain nor generally have access to the current balances and loan performance data with respect to the individual loans previously sold to investors. Accordingly, LendingTree Loans is unable to determine, with precision, its maximum exposure for breaches of the representations and warranties it made to the investors that purchased such loans.
The Company uses a settlement discount framework for evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for loan losses. This model estimates lifetime losses on the population of remaining loans originated and sold by LendingTree Loans using actual defaults for loans with similar characteristics and projected future defaults. It also considers the likelihood of claims expected due to alleged breaches of representations and warranties made by LendingTree Loans and the percentage of those claims investors estimate LendingTree Loans may agree to repurchase. A settlement discount factor is then applied to the result of the foregoing to reflect publicly-announced bulk settlements for similar loan types and vintages, the Company's own settlement experience, as well as LendingTree Loans' non-operating status, in order to estimate a range of potential obligation.
The estimated range of remaining loan losses using this settlement discount framework was determined to be
$4.3 million
to
$7.8 million
at
December 31, 2017
. The reserve balance recorded as of
December 31, 2017
was
$7.6 million
. Management has considered both objective and subjective factors in the estimation process, but given current general industry trends in mortgage loans as well as housing prices and market expectations, actual losses related to LendingTree Loans' obligations could vary significantly from the obligation recorded as of the balance sheet date or the range estimated above.
Additionally, LendingTree has guaranteed certain loans sold to
two
investors in the event that LendingTree Loans is unable to satisfy its repurchase and warranty obligations related to such loans.
Based on historical experience, it is anticipated that LendingTree Loans will continue to receive repurchase requests and incur losses on loans sold in prior years.
The activity related to loss reserves on previously sold loans is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Loan loss reserve, beginning of period
|
$
|
6,804
|
|
$
|
8,127
|
|
$
|
8,750
|
|
||
|
Provision adjustments
(a)
|
750
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Charge-offs to reserves
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loan loss reserve, end of period
|
$
|
7,554
|
|
$
|
6,804
|
|
$
|
8,127
|
|
||
87
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(a)
|
During 2016, the Company adjusted the loan loss reserve by
$1.8 million
to remove the estimated liability for loans sold to RFC. The Company is in litigation with RFC and reserved the loss for this litigation in the legal reserve.
See
Note
13
—Contingencies for additional information about the RFC litigation.
|
The liability for losses on previously sold loans is presented as current liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
.
NOTE
18
—SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has
one
reportable segment.
Mortgage and non-mortgage product revenue is as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||||
|
Mortgage products
|
$
|
275,910
|
|
$
|
219,991
|
|
$
|
165,272
|
|
||
|
Non-mortgage products
|
341,826
|
|
164,411
|
|
88,944
|
|
|||||
|
Total revenue
|
$
|
617,736
|
|
$
|
384,402
|
|
$
|
254,216
|
|
||
The following tables set forth summary financial information for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2017
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
132,515
|
|
$
|
152,773
|
|
$
|
171,494
|
|
$
|
160,954
|
|
|||
|
Operating income (expense)
(1)
|
6,884
|
|
8,969
|
|
17,455
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
(1) (2)
|
7,798
|
|
8,007
|
|
10,131
|
|
(6,518
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
(932
|
)
|
(689
|
)
|
(1,011
|
)
|
(1,208
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
6,866
|
|
$
|
7,318
|
|
$
|
9,120
|
|
$
|
(7,726
|
)
|
|||
|
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|||
|
Loss per share from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|||
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|||
|
(1)
|
In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved a
$10.0 million
contribution to fund the newly formed LendingTree Foundation. The contribution is recorded in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
|
|
(2)
|
During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a net tax expense of
$9.1 million
related to the enactment of the TCJA.
See
Note
10
—Income Taxes for additional information.
|
88
LENDINGTREE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
94,713
|
|
$
|
94,290
|
|
$
|
94,558
|
|
$
|
100,841
|
|
|||
|
Operating income
|
11,845
|
|
12,715
|
|
14,150
|
|
13,402
|
|
|||||||
|
Income from continuing operations
|
6,905
|
|
9,002
|
|
7,280
|
|
8,021
|
|
|||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
(1,203
|
)
|
(1,150
|
)
|
(664
|
)
|
(697
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
$
|
5,702
|
|
$
|
7,852
|
|
$
|
6,616
|
|
$
|
7,324
|
|
|||
|
Income per share from continuing operations:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|||
|
Loss per share from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|||
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|||
89
ITEM 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), management, with the participation of our principal executive officer (Chief Executive Officer) and our principal financial officer (Chief Financial Officer), evaluated, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which by their nature can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management's control objectives. Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all errors and fraud. A control system, irrespective of how well it is designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance and cannot guarantee that it will succeed in its stated objectives.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
December 31, 2017
, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017
. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework" (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Based on our evaluation under the framework in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the COSO, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2017
. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017
has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing under "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" included elsewhere in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act, Rules 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended
December 31, 2017
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
Other Information
None.
90
As set forth below, the information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with its
2018
Annual Meeting of Stockholders and which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
(the "
2018
Proxy Statement"), in accordance with General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K.
ITEM 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 10 will be contained in, and is hereby incorporated by reference to, the
2018
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11.
Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 will be contained in, and is hereby incorporated by reference to, the
2018
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by Item 12 will be contained in, and is hereby incorporated by reference to, the
2018
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 will be contained in, and is hereby incorporated by reference to, the
2018
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by Item 14 will be contained in, and is hereby incorporated by reference to, the
2018
Proxy Statement.
91
ITEM 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(
a) List of documents filed as part of this report:
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements of LendingTree, Inc.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules of LendingTree, Inc.
All financial statements and schedules have been omitted since the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, or is not applicable or required.
(3) Exhibits
The documents set forth below, numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference to the location indicated below.
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
Location
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-152700), filed August 1, 2008
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed August 25, 2008
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed August 25, 2008
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed August 25, 2008
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed August 25, 2008
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed November 16, 2010
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 21, 2011
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 21, 2011
|
|
92
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
Location
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 16, 2011
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2011
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 8, 2012
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 22, 2016
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
Exhibit 99.7(D) to the Registrant's Current Report on Form SC 13D/A filed November 3, 2017
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed August 25, 2008
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 15, 2017
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-152700), filed August 1, 2008
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed August 25, 2008
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2017
|
|
4.4
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2017
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2017
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2017
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2015
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed October 26, 2017
|
|
10.3
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (No. 001-34063) filed November 12, 2010
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed February 11, 2009
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (No. 001-34063) filed May 12, 2010
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (No. 001-34063) filed May 12, 2010
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2010
|
|
93
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
Location
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (No. 001-34063) filed November 12, 2010
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed October 26, 2017
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed October 26, 2017
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant's Annual Report on From 10-K filed March 1, 2016
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrant's Annual Report on From 10-K filed February 28, 2017
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrant's Annual Report on From 10-K filed February 28, 2017
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 2013
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed April 30, 2015
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Annual Report on From 10-K filed March 1, 2016
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Exhibit 4.3(A) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-218747), filed June 14, 2017
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-34063) filed March 27, 2009
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on From 10-Q filed May 7, 2014
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2014
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2014
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Exhibit 4.4(A) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-218747), filed June 14, 2017
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Exhibit 4.4(B) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-218747), filed June 14, 2017
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Exhibit 4.4(C) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-218747), filed June 14, 2017
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Exhibit 4.4(D) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-218747), filed June 14, 2017
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed April 30, 2015
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-152700), filed August 1, 2008
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 3, 2011
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Exhibit 10.86(b) to the Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-152700), filed July 13, 2012
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Exhibit 10.86(c) to the Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-152700), filed July 13, 2012
|
|
94
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
Location
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Exhibit 10.86(d) to the Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-152700), filed July 13, 2012
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (No. 001-34063) filed May 12, 2010
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2017
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2017
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed October 26, 2015
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant's Annual Report on From 10-K filed February 28, 2017
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2017
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
†+
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrant's Annual Report on From 10-K filed February 28, 2017
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant's Annual Report on From 10-K filed February 28, 2017
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
†
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
†
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
†
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
†
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
†
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
††
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
††
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
†††
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
†††
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
†††
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
†††
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
†††
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
†††
|
___________________________________________________________________________
† Filed herewith
95
†† This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
††† Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
* Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.
** Certain schedules to this Exhibit have been omitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(2). The Company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of all omitted schedules to the SEC upon its request.
+ Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and this exhibit has been submitted separately to the SEC.
Not applicable.
96
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date:
February 26, 2018
|
|
LendingTree, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ DOUGLAS R. LEBDA
|
|
|
|
Douglas R. Lebda
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
97
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Katharine Pierce as his or her true and lawful attorney and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
|
/s/ DOUGLAS R. LEBDA
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Douglas R. Lebda
|
||||
|
/s/ J.D. MORIARTY
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
J.D. Moriarty
|
||||
|
/s/ CARLA SHUMATE
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Carla Shumate
|
||||
|
/s/ GABRIEL DALPORTO
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Gabriel Dalporto
|
||||
|
/s/ THOMAS DAVIDSON
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Thomas Davidson
|
||||
|
/s/ NEAL DERMER
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Neal Dermer
|
||||
|
/s/ ROBIN HENDERSON
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Robin Henderson
|
||||
|
/s/ PETER HORAN
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Peter Horan
|
||||
|
/s/ STEVEN OZONIAN
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Steven Ozonian
|
||||
|
/s/ SARAS SARASVATHY
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Saras Sarasvathy
|
||||
|
/s/ G. KENNEDY THOMPSON
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
G. Kennedy Thompson
|
||||
|
/s/ CRAIG TROYER
|
Director
|
February 26, 2018
|
||
|
Craig Troyer
|
||||
98
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataNote 11 Debt, in The Notes To The Consolidated Financial Statements Included Elsewhere in This ReportItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskNote 6 - Business Acquisition - 2017 Acquisitions - DepositaccountsItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataNote 1 OrganizationNote 2 Significant Accounting PoliciesNote 3 Restricted CashNote 4 Property and EquipmentNote 5 Goodwill and Intangible AssetsNote 6 Business AcquisitionsNote 7 Accrued Expenses and Other Current LiabilitiesNote 8 Shareholders' EquityNote 9 Stock-based CompensationNote 10 Income TaxesNote 11 DebtNote 12 CommitmentsNote 13 ContingenciesNote 14 Fair Value MeasurementsNote 15 Related Party TransactionsNote 16 Benefit PlansNote 17 Discontinued OperationsNote 18 Segment InformationNote 19 Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement SchedulesItem 16. Form 10-k Summary