TRANSCAT INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
[
√
]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended: March 30, 2013
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission File Number: 000-03905
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Ohio
|
16-0874418
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(585) 352-7777
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.50 par value
|
NASDAQ Global Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [ ] No [√]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [ ] No [√]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [√] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [√] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company [√]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [ ] No [√]
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on September 29, 2012 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $36 million. The market value calculation was determined using the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on September 29, 2012, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market.
The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of June 17, 2013 was 7,458,981.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 10, 2013 have been incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page(s)
|
||
|
Part I
|
||
|
Part II
|
||
|
Part III
|
||
|
Part IV
|
||
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report and, in particular, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this report, contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include statements concerning expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry, management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc. (“Transcat”, “we”, “us”, or “our”). Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to forecast, including, among other things, the risks and uncertainties identified by us below under “Risk Factors” in Item IA of Part I of this report. Therefore, our actual results and outcomes may materially differ from those expressed or forecast in any such forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Transcat is a leading provider of accredited calibration, repair, inspection and compliance services and distributor of professional grade handheld test, measurement and control instrumentation. We are primarily focused on providing our products and services to the following:
|
·
|
The pharmaceutical industry and FDA-regulated businesses (such as biotechnology and medical device manufacturing);
|
|
·
|
Industrial manufacturing companies;
|
|
·
|
The energy industry and power, natural gas and water utility companies;
|
|
·
|
The chemical process industry; and
|
|
·
|
Other industries which require accuracy in their processes and confirmation of the capabilities of their equipment.
|
We conduct our business through two segments: service (“Service”) and distribution (“Distribution”).
Through our Service segment, we deliver precise, reliable, fast calibration and repair services. As of our fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 (“fiscal year 2013”), we operated eighteen calibration service centers (“Calibration Centers of Excellence”) strategically located across the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada, that collectively service over 12,000 customers. All of our Calibration Centers of Excellence are covered by ISO/IEC 17025 scopes of accreditation which are believed to be among the best in the industry. Our accreditation meets many international levels of quality, consistency and reliability. See “Service Segment – Quality” below in this Item 1 for more information.
Our Service segment also offers compliance services which include remediation, validation and analytical services primarily to pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated customers. These service offerings are driven by our customers’ needs to either maintain compliance with regulations and quality standards or, in the case of remediation, to regain compliance with regulations.
CalTrak® is our proprietary documentation and asset management system which is used to manage both the workflow of our Calibration Centers of Excellence and our customers’ assets. With CalTrak®, we are able to provide our customers with timely calibration service while optimizing our own efficiencies. Additionally, CalTrak-Online provides our customers direct access to certificates, data, and other key documents required in the calibration process. CalTrak® has been validated to U.S federal regulations 21CFR 820.75 and 21CFR 11, which is important to the pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated industries where federal regulations can be particularly stringent. See Service Segment - CalTrak® below in this Item 1 for more information.
Through our Distribution segment, we market and sell national and proprietary brand instruments to approximately 15,000 customers. Our product catalog (“Master Catalog”) and website offer access to more than 38,000 test, measurement and control instruments, including products from approximately 120 of the industry’s leading manufacturers including Fluke, GE, Emerson, Agilent, FLIR and Rosemount. In addition, we are the exclusive worldwide distributor for Transmation and Altek products. The majority of the instruments we sell require expert calibration service to ensure that they maintain the most precise measurements.
Our commitment to quality goes beyond the service and products we deliver. Our sales, customer service and support teams stand ready to provide expert advice, application assistance and technical support wherever and whenever our customers need it. Since calibration is an intangible service, our customers rely on us to uphold high standards and trust in the integrity of our people and processes.
1
Among our customers, and representing 26% of our consolidated revenue, are Fortune 500/Global 500 companies. Transcat has focused on the pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated industries, industrial manufacturing, energy and utility, chemical process and other industries since our founding in 1964. We are a leading supplier of test, measurement and control instrumentation in the markets we serve. We believe our customers do business with us because of our integrity and commitment to quality service, our broad range of product and service offerings, and our asset management system, CalTrak®.
Transcat was incorporated in Ohio in 1964. We are headquartered in Rochester, New York and employ more than 400 people. Our executive offices are located at 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624. Our telephone number is 585-352-7777.
OUR STRATEGY
Our objective is to continue to grow our Service and Distribution segments through organic revenue growth and acquisitions.
Within the Service segment, our strategy is to focus on customers that rely on accredited calibration services and/or compliance services and value superior quality to maintain the integrity of their processes and/or meet the demands of regulated business environments. We focus on customers that require precise measurement capability for their manufacturing and testing processes to minimize risk, waste and defects. We leverage these strategies based on our multiple locations, highly qualified technicians and breadth of capabilities.
As part of our growth strategy, we have engaged in a number of business acquisitions. During fiscal year 2013 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 (“fiscal year 2012”), we completed the following acquisitions:
|
·
|
On January 25, 2013, we acquired 7506155 Canada Inc. and its operating subsidiary, Cal-Matrix Metrology Inc. (collectively “Cal-Matrix”). Cal-Matrix is a provider of commercial and accredited calibration and coordinate measurement inspection services to customers throughout Canada and has locations in Burlington, Ontario and Montreal, Quebec.
|
|
·
|
On July 16, 2012, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Anacor Compliance Services, Inc. (“Anacor”), a nationally recognized provider of specialized analytical, calibration, validation and remediation services to the life science sector.
|
|
·
|
On September 8, 2011, we acquired the calibration services division of Newark Corporation (“Newark”), a provider of calibration and repair services to customers located primarily in Arizona, Colorado and Tennessee.
|
|
·
|
On April 5, 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets of CMC Instrument Services, Inc. (“CMC”), a Rochester, New York-based provider of dimensional calibration and repair services.
|
Our acquisition strategy primarily targets service businesses that expand our geographic reach and leverage our infrastructure while also increasing the depth and/or breadth of our service capabilities. Our acquisition strategy is focused on service businesses, and we expect that the growth rate of our Service segment should exceed that of our Distribution segment over the long term.
Our Distribution segment growth strategy is to be the premier distributor of leading hand-held test and measurement equipment. In support of this strategy, we continuously add new vendors and products to ensure a market leadership position. We have access to over 38,000 products through our vendor relationships with the goal to service all of our customers’ test and measurement instrumentation needs.
We believe our combined Distribution and Service segment offerings, experience, technical expertise and integrity create a unique and compelling value proposition for our customers. We strive to differentiate ourselves and build barriers to competitive entry by offering the best products and services, and integrating those products and services to benefit our customers’ operations and lower their costs.
Through our acquisition of Anacor, we have expanded our service offerings and are now able to provide a more complete suite of services to pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated customers. By adding analytical, validation and remediation services to our service offerings, we are able to further integrate into our customers’ processes.
2
SEGMENTS
We service our customers through two business segments: Service and Distribution. See note 7 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for financial information for these segments. We serve approximately 12,000 and 15,000 customers through our Service and Distribution segments, respectively. While some customers are served by both of our business segments, no customer or controlled group of customers accounted for 10% or more of our total consolidated revenue in either fiscal year 2013 or 2012. The loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet, or results of operations.
We concentrate on attracting new customers and also on cross-selling to existing customers to increase our total revenue. Our revenue from customers in the following geographic areas during the periods indicated, expressed as a percentage of total revenue, is as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
United States
|
91 | % | 91 | % | ||||
|
Canada
|
7 | % | 7 | % | ||||
|
Other International
|
2 | % | 2 | % | ||||
|
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
SERVICE SEGMENT
Calibration.
Calibration is the act of comparing a unit or instrument of unknown value to a standard of known value and reporting the result in some rigorously defined form. After the calibration has been completed, a decision is made, based on rigorously defined parameters, regarding what, if anything, should be done to the unit to conform to the required standards or specifications. The decision may be to adjust, optimize or repair a unit; limit the use, range or rating of a unit; scrap the unit; or leave the unit as is. The purpose of calibration is to significantly reduce the risk of product or process failures caused by inaccurate measurements.
Calibration improves an operation’s maximum productivity and efficiency by assuring accurate, reliable instruments and processes. Through our Service segment, we perform periodic calibrations (typically ranging from three month to twenty-four month intervals) on new and used instruments as well as repair services for our customers.
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities, equipment and uniquely trained personnel necessary to address all measurement disciplines with in-house calibration capabilities. We can address approximately 90% to 95% of the items requested to be calibrated with our in-house capabilities. For customers’ calibration needs in less common and highly technical disciplines, we have historically subcontracted to third party vendors that have unique or proprietary capabilities. While typically representing less than 20% of our Service segment revenue, the management of these vendors is highly valued by our customers and our relationships have enabled us to continue our pursuit of having the broadest calibration offerings to these targeted markets.
Compliance.
Our compliance services include analytical qualification, validation and remediation services. Analytical and validation services provide a comprehensive and highly specialized service offering focused on the pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated industries. Our goal is to deliver specialized technical services with a quality assurance approach, which maximizes document accuracy and on-time job delivery. These industries demand knowledgeable contract services and Transcat meets these demands with GMP, GLP and GxP compliant services. Companies within these innovative and cutting-edge industries need a reliable alternative to the original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and the “generalist” service providers who cannot meet their industry-specific needs. Remediation services are focused on assisting our customers with efforts to get back into compliance with regulations after the FDA or other government authority has taken action with respect to the customer’s operations.
Analytical services are typically based on service agreements for testing, preventative maintenance and repair and tend to generate recurring revenue. Validation services are based on certain customer processes. While specific validation services may not be repeated, we develop relationships with customers who may engage us for multiple unique validation services. Remediation services are based on specific regulatory actions and are generally required by a customer for a finite period of time. This revenue is not recurring by its nature.
Other Services.
We provide other services to our customers such as repair, inspection and consulting services. These services allow us to provide “one-stop shopping” for our customers.
3
Strategy.
Our Service segment provides periodic calibration services for our customers’ test and measurement instruments. We specifically target industries where quality calibrations are a critical operational component and believe calibration sourcing decisions are based on accreditation, reliability, trust, customer service, turn-around time, location, documentation, price and a one-source solution. Our success with customers is based on the trust they have in the integrity of our people and processes.
Transcat’s calibration services strategy encompasses two methods to manage a customer’s calibration and repair needs:
|
1)
|
If a company wishes to outsource its calibration needs, we offer an “Integrated Calibration Services Solution” that provides a complete wrap-around service which includes:
|
|
·
|
program management;
|
|
·
|
calibration;
|
|
·
|
logistics; and
|
|
·
|
consultation services.
|
|
2)
|
If a company has an in-house calibration operation, we can provide:
|
|
·
|
calibration of primary standards;
|
|
·
|
overflow capability either on-site or at one of our Calibration Centers of Excellence during periods of high demand; and
|
|
·
|
consultation and training services.
|
In both cases, we strive to have the broadest accredited calibration offering to our targeted markets, which includes certification of our technicians pursuant to the American Society for Quality standards, complete calibration management encompassing the entire metrology function, and access to our service offerings. We believe our calibration services are of the highest technical and quality levels, with broad ranges of accreditation. Our quality systems are further detailed in the section entitled “Quality” below.
Our compliance services strategy is to identify and establish long-term relationships with customers who require analytical, validation, and/or remediation services. In most cases, these customers are life science companies, including pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers, and are subject to extensive government regulation.
The compliance services that we provide to these regulated customers are typically a critical component of the customer’s overall compliance program. Due to the fact that many compliance service customers operate in regulated industries, these same customers typically also require accredited calibration services. This requirement allows a natural synergy among our compliance and calibration services. Our strategy includes cross-selling our services within our customer accounts to maximize our revenue opportunities with each customer.
The vast majority of our compliance services are provided at the customers’ locations by our staff of highly-trained technicians. We believe we have developed a reputation with our customers that is highly regarded and based on our technical competency and integrity.
CalTrak
®
.
CalTrak® and CalTrak-Online are our proprietary metrology management systems that provide a comprehensive calibration quality program. Many of our customers have unique calibration service requirements to which we have tailored specific services. CalTrak-Online allows our customers to track calibration data online and provides the customer with a safe and secure off-site archive of calibration records that can be accessed 24 hours a day. Access to records data is managed through our secure password-protected website. Calibration assets are tracked with records that are automatically cross-referenced to the equipment that was used to calibrate. CalTrak® has also been validated to meet the most stringent requirements within the industry.
We perform approximately 200,000 calibrations annually. These are performed at our Calibration Centers of Excellence or at the customer’s location. During fiscal year 2013, services completed by our Calibration Centers of Excellence represented 82% of our Service revenue while approximately 16% of our Service revenue was derived from services that were subcontracted to third party vendors, and the remaining 2% was associated with other billings. Our Service segment accounted for 36% of our total consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2013.
Marketing and Sales.
We have sales teams that seek to acquire new customers in our targeted markets and account management teams to ensure continued relationships with existing customers. In addition, we employ our Master Catalog, supplements, mailings, journal advertising, trade shows, and the Internet to market our services to customers and prospective customers with a strategic focus in the highly regulated industries including pharmaceutical, FDA-regulated, energy and utilities, and chemical processing. We also target industrial manufacturing and other industries that appreciate the value of quality calibrations. Our quality process and standards are designed to meet the needs of companies that must address regulatory requirements and/or have a strong commitment to quality and a comprehensive calibration and compliance program.
4
The approximate percentage of our Service revenue by industry type for the periods indicated are as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Pharmaceutical/FDA-Regulated
|
34 | % | 34 | % | ||||
|
Industrial Manufacturing
|
22 | % | 21 | % | ||||
|
Energy/Utilities
|
11 | % | 16 | % | ||||
|
Chemical Manufacturing
|
7 | % | 8 | % | ||||
|
Other
|
26 | % | 21 | % | ||||
|
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
Competition
.
The calibration industry is highly fragmented and is composed of companies ranging from internationally recognized and accredited corporations, such as Transcat, to non-accredited, sole proprietors as well as companies that perform their own calibrations in-house, resulting in a tremendous range of service levels and capabilities. A large percentage of calibration companies are small businesses that may not have a range of capabilities as broad as ours. There are also several companies with whom we compete who have national or regional operations. Certain of these competitors may have greater resources than us and some of them have accreditations that are similar to ours. We differentiate ourselves from our competitors by demonstrating our commitment to quality and by having a wide range of capabilities that are tailored to the markets we serve. Customers see the value in using our unique CalTrak-Online asset and data management program to monitor their instrument’s status, history and performance data. We are fundamentally different from most of our competitors because we have the ability to bundle product, calibration, compliance and other services as a single source for our customers.
Competition for compliance services is comprised of both small local and regional service providers and large multi-national companies who are also OEMs. While we are larger and financially stronger than many of the small local and regional competitors, the large OEMs are generally much larger than we are and have significantly more resources. Our competitive advantages are our flexibility and our turn-around time. We believe we can react to customers’ needs more quickly and effectively than our competitors.
Quality.
The accreditation process is the only system currently in existence that validates measurement competence. To ensure that the quality and consistency of our customer calibrations are consistent with the global metrology network, designed to standardize measurements worldwide, we have sought and achieved international levels of quality and accreditation. Our Calibration Centers of Excellence are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 using accrediting bodies in the United States that are signatories to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (“ILAC”). These accrediting bodies, which are proficient in the technical aspects of the chemistry and physics that underlie metrology, provide an objective, third party, internationally accepted evaluation of the quality, consistency, and competency of our calibration processes. Accreditation also requires that all measurement standards used for accredited measurements have a fully documented path, known as Metrological Traceability, through the National Institute of Standards and Technology or the National Research Council, (these are the National Measurement Institutes for the United States and Canada, respectively), or to other national or international standards bodies, or to measurable conditions created in our calibration service center, or accepted fundamental and/or natural physical constants, ratio type of calibration, or by comparison to consensus standards, all inclusive of measurement uncertainties.
The importance of this international oversight to our customers is the assurance that our documents will be accepted worldwide, removing one of the barriers to trade that they may experience if using a non-ILAC traceable calibration service provider. To provide the widest range of service to our customers in our target markets, our ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accreditations extend across many technical disciplines. We believe our scope of accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 to be the broadest for the industries we serve. Unless otherwise noted below, our calibration service centers are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The following table represents our capabilities for each of our Calibration Centers of Excellence as of March 30, 2013 (A=Accredited; N=Non-accredited):
5
WORKING-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
Electrical Metrology Disciplines
|
Dimensional Metrology Disciplines
|
||||||||||||||
|
Direct
|
Parts
|
||||||||||||||
|
Current/
|
High
|
Inspection
|
|||||||||||||
|
Alternating
|
Frequency/
|
(Geometric
|
|||||||||||||
|
Current
|
Ultra
|
Radio
|
Dimensioning
|
||||||||||||
|
- Low
|
- High
|
Frequency/
|
Luminance/
|
& Tolerancing/
|
|||||||||||
|
Frequency
|
Frequency
|
Microwave
|
Illuminance
|
Length
|
Optics
|
3-D Metrology)
|
|||||||||
|
Anaheim
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||
|
Boston
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Burlington
1
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Charlotte
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Cherry Hill
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||
|
Dayton
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Denver
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A |
|
|||||||||
|
Houston
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||
|
Lincoln
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||||
|
Montreal
1
|
A
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nashville
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||||
|
Ottawa/Toronto
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Phoenix
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||||
|
Portland
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||
|
Rochester
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||
|
San Juan
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
St. Louis
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Particle
|
Gas
|
Relative
|
Mass
|
Pressure,
|
|||||||||||
|
Flow
|
Counters
|
Force
|
Analysis
|
|
Humidity
|
Weight
|
Vacuum
|
||||||||
|
Anaheim
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Boston
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Burlington
1
|
N
|
A
|
|||||||||||||
|
Charlotte
|
A
|
N
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||
|
Cherry Hill
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||
|
Dayton
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Denver
|
A
|
N
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||
|
Houston
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Lincoln
|
A
|
||||||||||||||
|
Milwaukee
2
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nashville
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Ottawa/Toronto
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Phoenix
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Portland
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Rochester
|
N
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||
|
San Juan
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
St. Louis
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines (continued
)
|
Life Science Disciplines
|
||||||||||||||
|
Revolutions
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Per Minute,
|
Vibration,
|
Chemical/
|
|||||||||||||
|
Torque
|
Temperature
|
Speed
|
Acceleration
|
Biomedical
|
Biological
|
Pharmaceutical
|
|||||||||
|
Anaheim
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
|||||||||
|
Boston
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Burlington
1
|
A
|
N
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Charlotte
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Cherry Hill
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
A
|
N
|
||||||||
|
Dayton
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Denver
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
||||||||
|
Houston
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Lincoln
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nashville
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Ottawa/Toronto
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Phoenix
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Portland
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
|
Rochester
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
|||||||||
|
San Juan
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||||
|
St. Louis
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
N
|
|||||||||||
6
REFERENCE-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
Dimensional
|
Electrical
|
Humidity
|
Mass
|
Vacuum
|
Temperature
|
||||||||
|
Standards
|
Standards
|
Standards
|
Standards
|
Standards
|
Standards
|
||||||||
|
Burlington
1
|
A
|
||||||||||||
|
Charlotte
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Cherry Hill
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||
|
Dayton
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Houston
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Portland
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
Rochester
|
A
|
A
|
|||||||||||
|
San Juan
|
A
|
A
|
(1) These two locations are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 through the Standards Council of Canada-Calibration Laboratory Assessment Service (SCC-CLAS).
(2) Wisconsin operations regionally headquartered in Milwaukee, with locations in Madison and Green Bay, includes calibration of legal for trade (NIST Handbook 44) and industrial scales (heavy capacity, medium capacity, small capacity, vehicle, livestock, hopper, belt, platform, bench, counting, laboratory balances, etc.). These three locations are ISO/IEC 17025 accredited through ANAB/ACLASS.
DISTRIBUTION SEGMENT
Summary.
Our customers use test and measurement instruments to ensure that their processes, and ultimately their end products, are within specification. Utilization of such diagnostic instrumentation also allows for continuous improvement processes to be in place, increasing the accuracies of their measurements. The industrial test and measurement instrumentation market, in those geographic areas where we predominately operate, is serviced by broad-based national distributors and niche or specialty-focused organizations such as Transcat.
Most industrial customers find that maintaining an in-house inventory of back-up test and measurement instruments is cost prohibitive. As a result, the distribution of test and measurement instrumentation has traditionally been characterized by frequent, small quantity orders combined with a need for rapid, reliable, and complete order fulfillment. The decision to buy is generally made by plant engineers, quality managers, or their purchasing personnel and products are typically obtained from one or more distributors. Our catalog, website and sales activities are designed to maintain a constant presence in front of our customers to ensure we receive the order when they are ready to purchase.
The majority of the products we distribute are not consumables, but are purchased as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturing and research and development facilities. As a result, we evaluate Distribution sales trends over a twelve-month period as any individual month’s or quarter’s sales can be impacted by numerous factors, many of which are unpredictable and potentially non-recurring.
We believe that a customer chooses a distributor based on a number of different criteria including the timely delivery and accuracy of orders, consistent product quality, the technical competence of the representative serving them, value added services, as well as price. Value added services include providing technical support to insure our customer receives the right product for their specific need through application knowledge and product compatibility. We also provide calibration of product purchases, online procurement, same day shipment of in-stock items, a variety of custom product offerings and training programs. Because of the breadth of products we offer and the services we provide, we are often a “one-stop shop” for our customers who gain the operational efficiency of dealing with just one distributor for most or all of their test and measurement instrumentation needs.
Our Distribution segment accounted for 64% of our total consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2013. Within the Distribution segment, our routine business is comprised of customers who place orders to acquire new instrumentation or to upgrade or replace old instrumentation. Our average Distribution order is approximately $1,800. Items are regularly added to and deleted from our product offerings on the basis of customer demand, recommendations of suppliers, sales volumes and other factors.
Marketing and Sales.
We market and sell to our customers through multiple sales channels consisting of direct catalog marketing, our website, proactive outbound sales, and an inbound call center. Our outbound and inbound sales teams are staffed with technically trained personnel.
Through our comprehensive Master Catalog, supplemental catalogs, website, e-newsletters, and other direct sales and marketing programs, we offer our customers a broad selection of highly recognized branded products at competitive prices. The instruments typically range in price from $100 to over $25,000.
During fiscal year 2013, we circulated over 1.1 million pieces of direct marketing materials including catalogs, brochures, supplements and other promotional materials, of which approximately 470,000 were sent to customer contacts and approximately 660,000 were sent to potential customer contacts. We also disseminated approximately 1.5 million e-newsletters to our list of customers and prospective customers. Some of the key factors that determine the number of catalogs and other direct marketing materials sent to each customer include new product introductions, their market segments and the timing, frequency and monetary value of past purchases.
7
We use smaller catalog supplements that feature new products, promotions, or specific product categories to target existing customers and acquire new customers. The catalog supplements are launched at varying periods throughout the year.
Customers can also purchase products online at transcat.com. Our website serves as a growing sales channel for our products and services and provides product availability, detailed product information and advanced features such as product category search, demo videos and downloadable product specification sheets. We have optimized the website’s search engine, streamlined order entry and have the unique ability to supplement an order with an accredited calibration. Distribution sales via our website grew approximately 24% from fiscal year 2012 and represented 12% of our Distribution sales in fiscal year 2013.
Competition.
The distribution market for industrial test and measurement instrumentation is quite fragmented and highly competitive. Our competitors in this market range from large national distributors and manufacturers that sell directly to customers to small local distributors. In addition, web-based distributers have become more prevalent in recent years and are increasing their market share. Key competitive factors typically include customer service and support, quality, turnaround time, inventory availability, brand recognition and price. To address our customers’ needs for technical support and product application assistance, and to differentiate ourselves from competitors, we employ a staff of highly-trained technical sales specialists. In order to maintain this competitive advantage, technical training is an integral part of developing our sales staff.
Suppliers and Purchasing.
We believe that effective purchasing is a key element to maintaining and enhancing our position as a provider of high quality test and measurement instruments. We frequently evaluate our purchase requirements and suppliers’ offerings to obtain products at the best possible cost. We obtain our products from approximately 550 suppliers of brand name and private-labeled equipment. In fiscal year 2013, our top 10 vendors accounted for approximately 65% of our aggregate Distribution business. Approximately 30% of our product purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke Electronics Corporation (“Fluke”), which we believe to be consistent with Fluke’s share of the markets we service.
We plan our product mix and inventory stock to best serve the anticipated needs of our customers whose individual purchases vary in size. We can usually ship to our customers our top selling products the same day they are ordered.
Operations.
Our distribution operations primarily take place within an approximate 37,250 square-foot facility in Rochester, New York and a 12,600 square-foot facility in Portland, Oregon. The Rochester location also serves as our corporate headquarters; houses our customer service, sales and administrative functions; and has a calibration service center. The Portland location also serves as a calibration service center. In fiscal year 2013, we shipped over 37,000 product orders in the aggregate from both locations. In addition, we have two warehouse facilities in Wisconsin that fulfill orders for scales.
Distribution.
We distribute our products throughout North America and internationally from our distribution centers. We maintain appropriate inventory levels in order to satisfy anticipated customer demand for prompt delivery and complete order fulfillment of their product needs. These inventory levels are managed on a daily basis with the aid of our sophisticated purchasing and stock management information system. Our automated laser bar code scanning facilitates prompt and accurate order fulfillment and freight manifesting.
Backlog
.
Distribution orders include orders for instruments that we routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested to be calibrated in our laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped complete or at a future date, and other orders awaiting final credit or management review prior to shipment.
8
The following graph shows the quarter-end trend of pending product shipments and backorders for fiscal years 2012 and 2013:
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SUPPORT
Our breadth of products and services along with our strong commitment to customer service and support enable us to satisfy our customers’ needs through convenient selection and ordering; rapid, accurate, and complete order fulfillment; and on-time delivery.
Key elements of our customer service approach are our field sales team, outbound sales team, account management team, inbound sales and customer service organization. Most customer orders are placed through our customer service organization. To ensure the quality of service provided, we frequently monitor our customer service through customer surveys, call monitoring and daily statistical reports.
Customers may place orders via:
|
·
|
Mail to Transcat, Inc., 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, NY 14624;
|
|
·
|
Fax at 1-800-395-0543;
|
|
·
|
Telephone at 1-800-828-1470;
|
|
·
|
Email at
sales@transcat.com
; or
|
|
·
|
Online at
transcat.com
.
|
INFORMATION REGARDING EXPORT SALES
In each of the fiscal years 2013 and 2012, approximately 9% of our total revenue resulted from sales to customers outside the United States. Of those sales in fiscal year 2013, approximately 31% were denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining 69% were in Canadian dollars. Our revenue is subject to the customary risks of operating in an international environment, including the potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions, tariff and other tax increases, fluctuations in exchange rates and unstable political situations, any one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet or results of operations. See “Foreign Currency” in Item 7A of Part II of this report for further details.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
We utilize a turnkey enterprise software solution from Infor called Application Plus to manage our business and operations segments. This software includes a suite of fully integrated modules to manage our business functions, including customer service, warehouse management, inventory management, financial management, customer relations management and business intelligence. This solution is a fully mature business package and has been subject to more than 20 years of refinement. During fiscal year 2013, we completed implementation of customer relationship management (“CRM”) software offered by SalesForce.com. SalesForce.com is strategically partnered with Infor, which allowed us to fully integrate the CRM software with our Infor enterprise software.
We also utilize CalTrak®, our proprietary document and asset management system, to manage documentation, workflow and customers’ assets within and amongst our calibration service centers. In addition to functioning as an internal documentation, workflow, and asset management system, CalTrak®, through CalTrak-Online, provides customers with web-based calibration cycle management service and access to documentation relating to services completed by Transcat.
9
SEASONALITY
We believe that our business has certain historical seasonal factors. Historically, our fiscal first and second quarters have been generally weaker and our fiscal third and fourth quarters have been stronger due to industrial operating cycles.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
We believe that compliance with federal, state, or local provisions relating to the protection of the environment will not have any material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of fiscal year 2013, we had 412 employees, compared with 338 at the end of fiscal year 2012.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table presents certain information regarding our executive officers and certain key employees as of March 30, 2013:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
|
Charles P. Hadeed
|
63
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
Lee D. Rudow
|
48
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
||
|
John J. Zimmer
|
54
|
Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
Michael P. Craig
|
59
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
||
|
John P. Hennessy
|
64
|
Vice President of Sales and Marketing
|
||
|
Rainer Stellrecht
|
62
|
Vice President of Laboratory Operations
|
||
|
Jay F. Woychick
|
56
|
Vice President of Special Markets Sales and Business Development Managers
|
||
|
Scott D. Sutter
|
42
|
Vice President of Strategic Business Development
|
||
|
Derek C. Hurlburt
|
44
|
Corporate Controller
|
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, therefore, we file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such reports may be read and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains a website (
sec.gov
) that contains reports, proxy statements and other information for registrants that file electronically.
We maintain a website at
transcat.com
. We make available, free of charge, in the Investor Relations section of our website, documents we file with or furnish to the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports. We make this information available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish such information to, the SEC. The other information found on our website is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
We also post on our website our board of directors’ committee charters (audit committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and nominating committee), and Code of Ethics. Copies of such documents are available in print at no charge to any shareholder who makes a request. Such requests should be made to our corporate secretary at our corporate headquarters, 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624.
10
You should consider carefully the following risks and all other information included in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this report are not the only ones facing our business. If any of the following risks were to actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could fall and you could lose all or part of your investment.
We depend on manufacturers to supply our inventory and rely on one vendor to supply a significant amount of our inventory purchases. If our vendor fails to provide desired products to us, increases prices, or fails to timely deliver products, our revenue and gross profit could suffer.
A significant amount of our inventory purchases are made from one vendor, Fluke. Our reliance on this vendor leaves us vulnerable to having an inadequate supply of required products, price increases, late deliveries, and poor product quality. Like other distributors in our industry, we occasionally experience supplier shortages and are unable to purchase our desired volume of products. If we are unable to enter into and maintain satisfactory distribution arrangements with leading manufacturers, if we are unable to maintain an adequate supply of products, or if manufacturers do not regularly invest in, introduce to us, and/or make new products available to us for distribution, our sales could suffer considerably. Finally, we cannot provide any assurance that particular products, or product lines, will be available to us, or available in quantities sufficient to meet customer demand. This is of particular significance to our business because the products we sell are often only available from one source. Any limits to product access could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our future success may be affected by future indebtedness.
Under our revolving credit facility, as of March 30, 2013, we owed $8.0 million to our secured creditor. We may borrow additional funds in the future to support our growth and working capital needs. We are required to meet financial tests on a quarterly basis and comply with other covenants customary in secured financings. Although we believe that we will continue to comply with such covenants, if we do not remain in compliance with such covenants, our lender may demand immediate repayment of amounts outstanding. Changes in interest rates may have a significant effect on our payment obligations and operating results. Furthermore, we are dependent on credit from manufacturers of our products to fund our inventory purchases. If our debt burden increases to high levels, such manufacturers may restrict our credit. Our cash requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the rate of growth of our revenues, the timing and levels of products purchased, payment terms, and credit limits from manufacturers, the timing and level of our accounts receivable collections and our ability to manage our business profitably. Our ability to satisfy our existing obligations, whether or not under our secured credit facility, will depend upon our future operating performance, which may be impacted by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, and other factors described in this report, many of which are beyond our control.
The relatively low trading volume of our common stock may limit your ability to sell your shares.
Although our shares of common stock are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, we have historically experienced a relatively low trading volume. If our low trading volume continues in the future, holders of our shares may have difficulty selling a large number of shares of our common stock in the manner or at a price that might otherwise be attainable.
If significant existing shareholders sell large numbers of shares of our common stock, our stock price could decline.
The market price of our common stock could decline if a large number of our shares are sold in the public market by our existing shareholders or holders of stock options or as a result of the perception that these sales could occur. Due to the low trading volume of our common stock, the sale of a large number of shares of our common stock may significantly depress the price of our common stock. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, certain shareholders who are advised by NSB Advisors LLC (“NSB”) sold a significant amount of our common stock, which reduced the price of our common stock. According to an amendment to Schedule 13G filed by NSB dated February 11, 2013, clients of NSB held 28.4% of our common stock. If clients of NSB or any of our other significant shareholders sell large amounts of our common stock, the price of our common stock may decline.
Our acquisitions or future acquisition efforts, which are important to our growth, may not be successful, which may limit our growth or adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Acquisitions have been an important part of our development to date. As part of our business strategy, we may make additional acquisitions of companies that could complement or expand our business, augment our market coverage, provide us with important relationships or otherwise offer us growth opportunities. If we identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be able to negotiate successfully the terms of or finance the acquisition. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate the operations of our acquisitions without encountering difficulties, including unanticipated costs, possible difficulty in retaining customers and supplier or manufacturing relationships, failure to retain key employees, the diversion of our management’s attention or failure to integrate our information and accounting systems. We may not realize the revenues and cost savings that we expect to achieve or that would justify the investments, and we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate. To effectively manage our expected future growth, we must continue to successfully manage our integration of the companies that we acquire and continue to improve our operational systems, internal procedures, accounts receivable and management, financial and operational controls. If we fail in any of these areas, our business growth and results of operations could be adversely affected.
11
Any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets could negatively impact our results of operations.
Our goodwill and other intangible assets are subject to an impairment test on an annual basis and are also tested whenever events and circumstances indicate that goodwill and/or intangible assets may be impaired. Any excess goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangible assets value resulting from the impairment test must be written off in the period of determination. Intangible assets (other than goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets) are generally amortized over the useful life of such assets. In addition, from time to time, we may acquire or make an investment in a business that will require us to record goodwill based on the purchase price and the value of the acquired tangible and intangible assets. We may subsequently experience unforeseen issues with the businesses we acquire, which may adversely affect the anticipated returns of the business or value of the intangible assets and trigger an evaluation of the recoverability of the recorded goodwill and intangible assets for such business. Future determinations of significant write-offs of goodwill or intangible assets because of an impairment test or any accelerated amortization of other intangible assets could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. We have completed our annual impairment analysis for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, and have concluded that we do not have any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets as of March 30, 2013.
The financing of any future acquisitions we make may result in dilution to your stock ownership and/or could increase our leverage and our risk of defaulting on our bank debt.
Our business strategy includes expansion into new markets and enhancement of our position in existing markets, including through acquisitions. In order to successfully complete targeted acquisitions we may issue additional equity securities that could dilute your stock ownership. We may also incur additional debt if we acquire another company, which could significantly increase our leverage and our risk of default under our existing credit facility.
Adverse changes in general economic conditions or uncertainty about future economic conditions could adversely affect us.
We are subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in general economic market conditions. The U.S. economy remains sluggish as it seeks to recover from a severe recession and unprecedented turmoil. The U.S. economy continues to suffer from market volatility, reduced government spending, tight credit markets, concerns of inflation, historically high unemployment, and continuing economic uncertainties. The uncertainty about future economic conditions could negatively affect our current and prospective customers causing them to delay the purchase of necessary services or test and measurement instruments. Poor economic conditions could harm our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.
The distribution industry is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully.
We compete with numerous companies, including several major manufacturers and distributors. Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do, which could allow them to compete more successfully. Most of our products are available from several sources and our customers tend to have relationships with several distributors. Competitors could obtain exclusive rights to market particular products, which we would then be unable to market. Manufacturers could also increase their efforts to sell directly to end-users and bypass distributors like us. Industry consolidation among distributors, the unavailability of products, whether due to our inability to gain access to products or interruptions in supply from manufacturers, or the emergence of new competitors could also increase competition and adversely affect our business or results of operations. In the future, we may be unable to compete successfully and competitive pressures may reduce our sales.
We rely on our CalTrak®
,
Application Plus and other
management information systems for inventory management, distribution, workflow, accounting and other functions. If our CalTrak®
,
Application Plus and other
information systems fail to adequately perform these functions or if we experience an interruption in their operation, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The efficient operation of our business depends on our management information systems. We rely on our CalTrak®, Application Plus and other management information systems to effectively manage accounting and financial functions, customer service, warehouse management, order entry, order fulfillment, inventory replenishment, documentation, asset management, and workflow. The failure of our management information systems to perform could disrupt our business and could result in decreased revenues, increased overhead costs, excess inventory and product shortages, causing our business and results of operations to suffer. In addition, our management information systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses or hackers, natural or man-made disasters, terrorist attacks, power loss, or other computer systems, internet, telecommunications or data network failures. Any such interruption could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we fail to attract qualified personnel, we may not be able to achieve our stated corporate objectives.
Our ability to manage our anticipated growth, if realized, effectively depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers and technical personnel. If we fail to attract and retain qualified individuals, we will not be able to achieve our stated corporate objectives.
Our revenue depends on retaining capable sales personnel as well as our relationships with key customers, key vendors and manufacturers of the products that we distribute.
Our future operating results depend on our ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with qualified sales personnel as well as key customers, vendors and manufacturers who appreciate the value of our services. If we fail to maintain our existing relationships with such persons or fail to acquire relationships with such key persons in the future, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
12
Our future success is substantially dependent upon our senior management.
Our future success is substantially dependent upon the efforts and abilities of members of our existing senior management. Competition for senior management is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining key personnel, the inability of which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Tax legislation initiatives could adversely affect the Company’s net earnings and tax liabilities.
We are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the United States federal, state and local governments, as well as foreign jurisdictions. From time to time, various legislative initiatives may be proposed that could adversely affect our tax positions. There can be no assurance that our effective tax rate will not be adversely affected by these initiatives. In addition, tax laws and regulations are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. Although we believe that our historical tax positions are sound and consistent with applicable laws, regulations and existing precedent, there can be no assurance that our tax positions will not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would be successful in any such challenge.
We expect that our quarterly results of operations will fluctuate. Such fluctuation could cause our stock price to decline.
A large portion of our expenses for our Service segment, including expenses for facilities, equipment and personnel are relatively fixed. Accordingly, if revenues decline or do not grow as we anticipate, we may not be able to correspondingly reduce our operating expenses in any particular quarter. Our quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the future. Factors such as fluctuations in industrial demand for products we sell, services we provide, and in which we operate, could cause our revenues and operating results to fluctuate. If our operating results in some quarters fail to meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our stock price would likely decline.
Changes in accounting standards, legal requirements and the NASDAQ stock market listing standards, or our ability to comply with any existing requirements or standards, could adversely affect our operating results.
Extensive reforms relating to public company financial reporting, corporate governance and ethics, The NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and oversight of the accounting profession have been implemented over the past several years and continue to evolve. Compliance with these rules, regulations and standards that have resulted from such reforms has increased our accounting and legal costs and has required significant management time and attention. In the event that additional rules, regulations or standards are implemented or any of the existing rules, regulations or standards to which we are subject undergoes additional material modification, we could be forced to spend significant financial and management resources to ensure our continued compliance, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, although we believe we are in full compliance with all such existing rules, regulations and standards, should we be or become unable to comply with any of such rules, regulations and standards, as they presently exist or as they may exist in the future, our results of operations could be adversely effected and the market price of our common stock could decline.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The stock market, from time to time, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are both related and unrelated to the operating performance of companies. As our stock may be affected by market volatility, and by our own performance, the following factors, among others, may have a significant effect on the market price of our common stock:
|
·
|
Developments in our relationships with current or future manufacturers of products we distribute;
|
|
·
|
Announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
·
|
Litigation or governmental proceedings or announcements involving us or our industry;
|
|
·
|
Economic and other external factors, such as disasters or other crises;
|
|
·
|
Sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market;
|
|
·
|
Period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results; and
|
|
·
|
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations.
|
13
Not applicable.
The following table presents our leased properties as of March 30, 2013:
|
Approximate
|
||||||
|
Property
|
Location
|
Square Footage
|
||||
|
Corporate Headquarters, Distribution Center and Calibration Service Center
|
Rochester, NY
|
37,250 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Anaheim, CA
|
4,000 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Boston, MA
|
4,000 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Burlington, ON
|
14,152 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Charlotte, NC
|
4,860 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
8,550 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Dayton, OH
|
9,000 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Denver, CO
|
19,441 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Houston, TX
|
10,333 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center and Warehouse (1)
|
Lincoln, MT
|
11,406 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Montreal, QC
|
1,443 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Nashville, TN
|
6,000 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Ottawa, ON
|
3,990 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
4,000 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center and Distribution Center
|
Portland, OR
|
12,600 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
San Juan, PR
|
1,560 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
St. Louis, MO
|
4,400 | ||||
|
Calibration Service Center
|
Toronto, ON
|
2,070 | ||||
|
Compliance Services:
|
||||||
|
Service Center
|
Furlong, PA
|
1,740 | ||||
|
Service Center
|
Golden, CO
|
2,000 | ||||
|
United Scale & Engineering:
|
||||||
|
Service Center
|
Green Bay, WI
|
3,320 | ||||
|
Service Center and Warehouse
|
Madison, WI
|
6,000 | ||||
|
Service Center and Warehouse
|
Milwaukee, WI
|
16,000 | ||||
|
|
|
(1)
|
Properties owned by the Company
|
We believe that our properties are in good condition, are well maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate to carry on our business in its current form.
None.
Not applicable.
14
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “TRNS.” As of June 17, 2013, we had approximately 534 shareholders of record.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The following table presents, on a per share basis, for the periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for each quarterly period in fiscal years 2013 and 2012:
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Fourth
|
|||||||||||||
|
Quarter
|
Quarter
|
Quarter
|
Quarter
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2013:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
High
|
$ | 13.40 | $ | 7.00 | $ | 7.70 | $ | 7.10 | ||||||||
|
Low
|
$ | 6.23 | $ | 5.30 | $ | 5.12 | $ | 5.73 | ||||||||
|
Fiscal Year 2012:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
High
|
$ | 10.98 | $ | 12.17 | $ | 12.95 | $ | 13.11 | ||||||||
|
Low
|
$ | 8.01 | $ | 9.33 | $ | 10.92 | $ | 11.00 | ||||||||
DIVIDENDS
We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and have no current plans to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
15
The following table provides selected financial data for fiscal year 2013 and the previous four fiscal years (in thousands, except per share data). Certain reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal years have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal year.
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
FY 2011
|
FY 2010
|
FY 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Revenue
|
$ | 112,296 | $ | 110,020 | $ | 91,186 | $ | 81,061 | $ | 75,419 | ||||||||||
|
Total Cost of Revenue
|
84,892 | 82,896 | 67,888 | 61,767 | 56,671 | |||||||||||||||
|
Gross Profit
|
27,404 | 27,124 | 23,298 | 19,294 | 18,748 | |||||||||||||||
|
Operating Expenses
|
21,458 | 21,696 | 18,711 | 16,913 | 16,062 | |||||||||||||||
|
Operating Income
|
5,946 | 5,428 | 4,587 | 2,381 | 2,686 | |||||||||||||||
|
Interest and Other Expense, net
|
228 | 182 | 105 | 98 | 167 | |||||||||||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
5,718 | 5,246 | 4,482 | 2,283 | 2,519 | |||||||||||||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
2,014 | 1,944 | 1,694 | 832 | 963 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 3,704 | $ | 3,302 | $ | 2,788 | $ | 1,451 | $ | 1,556 | ||||||||||
|
Share Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||||
|
Basic Average Shares Outstanding
|
7,404 | 7,309 | 7,290 | 7,352 | 7,304 | |||||||||||||||
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.49 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||||
|
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding
|
7,592 | 7,651 | 7,521 | 7,549 | 7,469 | |||||||||||||||
|
Closing Price Per Share
|
$ | 6.36 | $ | 13.11 | $ | 8.00 | $ | 7.14 | $ | 4.90 | ||||||||||
|
As of or for the Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
March 26,
2011
|
March 28,
2010
|
March 29,
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance Sheets and Working Capital Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inventory, net
|
$ | 6,803 | $ | 6,396 | $ | 7,571 | $ | 5,906 | $ | 4,887 | ||||||||||
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
6,885 | 5,306 | 5,253 | 4,163 | 4,174 | |||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net
|
21,283 | 15,839 | 13,648 | 11,272 | 9,014 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
55,047 | 44,977 | 41,360 | 35,713 | 29,391 | |||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
2,702 | 2,896 | 2,293 | 2,080 | 1,897 | |||||||||||||||
|
Capital Expenditures
|
2,657 | 1,391 | 1,647 | 1,128 | 1,775 | |||||||||||||||
|
Long-Term Debt
|
8,017 | 3,365 | 5,253 | 2,532 | 3,559 | |||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders' Equity
|
31,650 | 27,378 | 23,329 | 20,257 | 18,619 | |||||||||||||||
OVERVIEW
Operational Overview.
We are a leading provider of accredited calibration, repair, inspection and compliance services and a distributor of professional grade handheld test, measurement and control instrumentation.
We operate our business through two reportable business segments, Service and Distribution, which offer a range of services and products to the same customer base.
Our strength in our Service segment is based upon our wide range of disciplines and our investment in the quality systems that are required in our targeted market segments. Our services range from the calibration and repair of a single unit to managing a customer’s entire calibration program. We believe our Service segment offers an opportunity for long-term growth and the potential for continuing revenue from established customers with regular calibration cycles and recurring compliance services requirements.
16
In our Distribution segment, our Master Catalog is widely recognized by both original equipment manufacturers and customers as the ultimate source for test and measurement instruments. Additionally, because we specialize in handheld test and measurement instruments, as opposed to a wide array of industrial products, our sales and customer service personnel can provide value-added technical assistance to our customers to aid them in determining what product best meets their particular application requirements.
Sales in our Distribution segment can be heavily impacted by changes in the economic environment. As customers increase or decrease capital and discretionary spending, our Distribution sales will typically be directly impacted. The majority of our products are not consumables, but are purchased as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturing and research and development facilities. Year-over-year sales growth in any one quarter can be impacted by a number of factors including the addition of new product offerings or channels of distribution.
We evaluate revenue growth in both of our business segments against a trailing twelve month trend, and not by analyzing any single quarter.
Financial Overview.
In evaluating our results for fiscal year 2013, the following factors should be taken into account:
|
·
|
Fiscal year 2013 and the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 operating results include 52 weeks and 13 weeks, respectively, compared to 53 weeks and 14 weeks for the corresponding periods for fiscal year 2012.
|
|
·
|
Fiscal year 2013 operating results include a full year of operations from CMC and Newark, whereas, fiscal year 2012 operating results included such operations from their dates of acquisition on April 5, 2011 and September 8, 2011, respectively.
|
|
·
|
Fiscal year 2013 operating results include those of Anacor and Cal-Matrix from their dates of acquisition on July 16, 2012 and January 25, 2013, respectively.
|
Total revenue for fiscal year 2013 was $112.3 million, a 2.1% increase compared with total revenue of $110.0 million for fiscal year 2012. Service revenue increased 11.7% to $40.7 million, or 36.2% of total revenue, in fiscal year 2013. Of our Service revenue in fiscal year 2013, 82.1% was generated by our Calibration Centers of Excellence while 15.5% was generated through subcontracted third party vendors, compared with 78.9% and 18.6%, respectively, in fiscal year 2012. The balance of Service revenue was associated with other charges.
Distribution sales decreased 2.7% to $71.6 million, or 63.8% of total revenue, in fiscal year 2013. Sales to domestic customers comprised 89.1% of total Distribution sales in fiscal year 2013, while 7.5% were to Canadian customers and 3.4% were to customers in other international markets.
Gross margin for fiscal year 2013 was 24.4%, a 30 basis point decrease compared with gross margin of 24.7% in fiscal year 2012. Service gross margin increased to 25.3% in fiscal year 2013 compared with 23.7% in fiscal year 2012, while Distribution gross margin was 23.9% in fiscal year 2013 compared with 25.1% in fiscal year 2012.
Operating expenses were $21.5 million, or 19.1% of total revenue, in fiscal year 2013 compared with $21.7 million, or 19.8% of total revenue, in fiscal year 2012. Operating income was $5.9 million in fiscal year 2013 compared with $5.4 million in fiscal year 2012.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The following is a summary of our most critical accounting policies. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates.
The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts and returns, inventory reserves, probability of achievement for performance-based restricted stock units, depreciable lives of fixed assets and estimated lives of our major catalogs and intangible assets. Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, our accounting estimates require the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as our operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
17
Accounts Receivable.
Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. We apply a specific formula to our accounts receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of revenues and/or the historical rate of returns.
Inventory.
Inventory consists of products purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost or market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories of our inventory. We evaluate the adequacy of the reserve on a quarterly basis. At March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, we had reserves for inventory losses totaling $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Property and Equipment, Depreciation and Amortization
.
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily under the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
Years
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
2 – 15
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
3 – 10
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
2 – 10
|
|
Buildings
|
39
|
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written off at their then remaining net book value. We capitalize certain costs incurred in the procurement and development of computer software used for internal purposes. Leasehold improvements are amortized under the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of an acquired business. Other intangible assets, namely customer base and covenants not to compete, represent an allocation of purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of an acquired business. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using the fair market value measurement requirement.
We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions indicate that such impairment could exist. Other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. We have determined that no impairment was indicated as of March 30, 2013 and March 30, 2012.
Catalog Costs.
We capitalize the cost of each Master Catalog mailed and amortize the cost over the respective catalog’s estimated productive life. We review response results from catalog mailings on a continuous basis; and if warranted, modify the period over which costs are recognized. We amortize the cost of each Master Catalog over an eighteen month period and amortize the cost of each catalog supplement over a three month period. Total unamortized catalog costs, included as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $0.3 million as of March 30, 2013 and $0.4 million as of March 31, 2012.
Deferred Taxes.
We account for certain income and expense items differently for financial reporting purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. If necessary, a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is provided for items for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of such items will not be realized based on an assessment of both positive and negative evidence. See “Taxes” below and Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
Stock-Based Compensation.
We measure the cost of services received in exchange for all equity awards granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock units, based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. We record compensation cost related to unvested equity awards by recognizing, on a straight line basis, the unamortized grant date fair value over the remaining service period of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of equity awards are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. We did not capitalize any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our historical experience.
18
We grant performance-based restricted stock units as a primary component of executive compensation. The units generally vest following the third fiscal year from the date of grant subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible period. Compensation cost ultimately recognized for these performance-based restricted stock units will equal the grant-date fair market value of the unit that coincides with the actual outcome of the performance conditions. On an interim basis, we record compensation cost based on an assessment of the probability of achieving the performance conditions. We achieved 75% of the target level for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in the fiscal year ended March 27, 2010 and as a result, issued 52 thousand shares of common stock to executive officers and certain key employees during the first quarter of fiscal year 2013. At March 30, 2013, we achieved 75% of the target level for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in the fiscal year ended March 26, 2011, and we estimated the probability of achievement for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in fiscal years 2013 and 2012 to be 100% and 125% of the target levels, respectively.
See Note 6 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure regarding our stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition.
Distribution sales are recorded when an order’s title and risk of loss transfers to the customer. We recognize the majority of our Service revenue based upon when the calibration or other activity is performed and then shipped and/or delivered to the customer. Some of our Service revenue is generated from managing customers’ calibration programs in which we recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals. We generally invoice our customers for freight, shipping, and handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the related revenues are recorded based upon historical data.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
We do not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Reclassification of Amounts.
Certain reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal years have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal year. In addition, certain reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal quarters have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal quarters.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Gross Profit Percentage:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution Gross Profit
|
23.9 | % | 25.1 | % | ||||
|
Service Gross Profit
|
25.3 | % | 23.7 | % | ||||
|
Total Gross Profit
|
24.4 | % | 24.7 | % | ||||
|
As a Percentage of Total Revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution Sales
|
63.8 | % | 66.9 | % | ||||
|
Service Revenue
|
36.2 | % | 33.1 | % | ||||
|
Total Revenue
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses
|
11.6 | % | 12.5 | % | ||||
|
Administrative Expenses
|
7.5 | % | 7.3 | % | ||||
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
19.1 | % | 19.8 | % | ||||
|
Operating Income
|
5.3 | % | 4.9 | % | ||||
|
Interest and Other Expense, net
|
0.2 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
5.1 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
1.8 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||
|
Net Income
|
3.3 | % | 3.0 | % | ||||
19
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 30, 2013 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
Revenue:
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
|
Revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution
|
$ | 71,641 | $ | 73,614 | ||||
|
Service
|
40,655 | 36,406 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 112,296 | $ | 110,020 | ||||
Total revenue increased $2.3 million, or 2.1%, from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013.
Service revenue, which accounted for 36.2% and 33.1% of our total revenue in fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively, increased 11.7% from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013. This growth was primarily due to business acquisitions.
Within any year, while we add new customers, we also have customers from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat for any number of factors. Among those factors are the variations in the timing of customer periodic calibrations on instruments and other services, customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing decisions. Because the timing of service orders and segment expenses can vary on a quarter-to-quarter basis, we believe a trailing twelve month trend provides a better indication of the progress of this segment. Our fiscal years 2013 and 2012 Service revenue growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, were as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
|||||||||
|
Service Revenue Growth
|
14.1%
|
8.9%
|
19.8%
|
3.7%
|
20.1%
|
24.0%
|
10.3%
|
10.1%
|
||||||||
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities, equipment and uniquely trained personnel necessary to address all measurement disciplines with in-house calibration capabilities. Our strategy has been to focus our investments in the core electrical, temperature, pressure and dimensional disciplines. Accordingly, over the long-term, we expect to outsource 15% to 20% of Service revenue to third party vendors for calibration beyond our chosen scope of capabilities. During any individual quarter, we could fluctuate beyond these percentages. We will continue to evaluate the need for capital investments that could provide more in-house capabilities for our staff of technicians and reduce the need for third party vendors in certain instances. The following table presents the source of our Service revenue and the percent of Service revenue for each quarter during fiscal years 2013 and 2012:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Percent of Service Revenue:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Depot/Onsite
|
83.7 | % | 82.3 | % | 82.6 | % | 79.1 | % | 80.5 | % | 77.9 | % | 79.0 | % | 77.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
Outsourced
|
14.1 | % | 15.3 | % | 14.9 | % | 18.3 | % | 16.7 | % | 19.7 | % | 18.5 | % | 19.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
2.2 | % | 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.8 | % | 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Our Distribution sales accounted for 63.8% and 66.9% of our total revenue in fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively. Year-over-year Distribution sales decreased $2.0 million, or 2.7%. Both the economic environment and eight fewer business days in fiscal year 2013 versus fiscal year 2012 contributed to this decline. Our fiscal years 2013 and 2012 Distribution sales (decline) growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons were as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
|||||||||
|
Distribution Sales (Decline) Growth
|
(5.9%)
|
0.3%
|
(0.1%)
|
(4.8%)
|
19.2%
|
17.0%
|
26.0%
|
32.4%
|
||||||||
20
Although Distribution sales declined in fiscal year 2013, Distribution sales per business day increased to $287 thousand in fiscal year 2013, compared with $285 thousand in fiscal year 2012. Our Distribution sales per business day for each fiscal quarter during the fiscal years 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
|||||||||
|
Distribution Sales Per Business Day
|
$300
|
$319
|
$269
|
$260
|
$295
|
$308
|
$269
|
$268
|
||||||||
Distribution orders include orders for instruments that we routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested to be calibrated in our service centers prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped complete or at a future date, and other orders awaiting final credit or management review prior to shipment. Our total pending product shipments increased $0.3 million, or 11.2%, at the end of fiscal year 2013 compared to the balance at the end of fiscal year 2012. Increased backorders and orders awaiting credit approval were the primary drivers for this year-over-year increase. Variations in pending product shipments can be impacted by several factors, including the timing product orders are placed in relation to the end of the fiscal period, specialized product orders that are not stocked, or production issues experienced by manufacturers. The following table presents the percentage of total pending product shipments that were backorders at the end of each quarter in fiscal years 2013 and 2012 and our historical trend of total pending product shipments:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Pending Product Shipments
|
$ | 2,968 | $ | 2,826 | $ | 2,365 | $ | 2,806 | $ | 2,670 | $ | 3,572 | $ | 3,368 | $ | 3,002 | |||||||||||||||||
|
% of Pending Product Shipments that are Backorders
|
71.9 | % | 69.6 | % | 68.6 | % | 68.8 | % | 70.9 | % | 65.6 | % | 73.6 | % | 67.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Gross Profit:
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
|
Gross Profit:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution
|
$ | 17,102 | $ | 18,504 | ||||
|
Service
|
10,302 | 8,620 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 27,404 | $ | 27,124 | ||||
Total gross profit in fiscal year 2013 increased by $0.3 million, or 1.0%, from fiscal year 2012. As a percentage of total revenue, total gross margin declined 30 basis points over the same time period.
Service gross profit increased $1.7 million, or 19.5%, from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013. Service gross margin increased 160 basis points from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013, primarily due to increased revenue combined with continued cost control. Our annual and quarterly Service gross margins are a function of several factors. Our organic Service revenue growth provides incremental gross margin growth by leveraging the relatively fixed cost structure of this segment. Service revenue growth from our recent business acquisitions, while providing a base for future organic revenue growth, may moderate or reduce our gross margins as we acquire additional fixed costs. The following table presents the quarterly historical trend of our Service gross margin as a percent of Service revenue:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
|||||||||
|
Service Gross Margin
|
31.3%
|
21.5%
|
23.9%
|
22.9%
|
27.3%
|
20.1%
|
22.4%
|
24.1%
|
||||||||
We evaluate Distribution gross profit from two perspectives. Channel gross profit includes net sales less the direct cost of inventory sold. Our Distribution gross profit includes channel gross profit as well as the impact of vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers, freight expenses and direct shipping costs. In general, our Distribution gross margin can vary based upon the mix of products sold, price discounting, and the timing of periodic vendor rebates and cooperative advertising income received from suppliers.
21
Total Distribution gross margin in fiscal year 2013 was 23.9%, a decrease of 120 basis points when compared with 25.1% in fiscal year 2012. Distribution gross profit decreased $1.4 million in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012, primarily a result of increased price discounts extended to customers and lower vendor rebates, partially offset by increased cooperative advertising income. The following table presents the quarterly historical trend of our Distribution gross profit as a percent of Distribution sales:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Channel Gross Margin (1)
|
20.8 | % | 21.2 | % | 21.5 | % | 22.7 | % | 23.3 | % | 22.5 | % | 23.1 | % | 23.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
Total Distribution Gross Margin (2)
|
24.7 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.0 | % | 25.7 | % | 24.7 | % | 25.6 | % | 25.4 | % | 24.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
(1) Channel gross margin is calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2) Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses:
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
|
Operating Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse
|
$ | 13,001 | $ | 13,751 | ||||
|
Administrative
|
8,457 | 7,945 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 21,458 | $ | 21,696 | ||||
Operating expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 1.1%, from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013. As a percentage of total revenue, operating expenses in fiscal year 2013 improved to 19.1% from 19.8% in fiscal year 2012 reflecting lower performance-based compensation, partially offset by one-time sales organization restructuring charges, implementation costs of our customer relationship management software and additional direct marketing expenses.
Taxes:
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
$ | 2,014 | $ | 1,944 | ||||
Our effective tax rates for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 were 35.2% and 37.1%, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe that amounts available under our current credit facility and our cash on hand are sufficient to satisfy our expected working capital and capital expenditure needs as well as our lease commitments for the foreseeable future. See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion about our credit facility.
Cash Flows.
The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (dollars in thousands):
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
|
Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
||||||||
|
Operating Activities
|
$ | 5,241 | $ | 6,259 | ||||
|
Investing Activities
|
(9,686 | ) | (4,513 | ) | ||||
|
Financing Activities
|
4,772 | (1,751 | ) | |||||
Operating Activities:
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2013 was $5.2 million compared to $6.3 million in fiscal year 2012. Significant working capital fluctuations were as follows:
22
|
·
|
Inventory/Accounts Payable: Inventory balance at March 30, 2013 was $6.8 million, an increase of $0.4 million when compared to $6.4 million on-hand at March 31, 2012. Our inventory strategy includes making appropriate larger quantity, higher dollar based purchases with key manufacturers for various reasons, including maximizing on-hand availability of key products, reducing backorders for those products with long lead times and optimizing vendor volume discounts. As a result, inventory levels from quarter-to-quarter will vary based on the timing of these larger orders in relation to the quarter-end.
In general, our accounts payable balance increases or decreases as a result of timing of vendor payments for inventory receipts. However, this correlation may vary at a quarter-end due to the timing of vendor payments for inventory receipts and inventory shipped directly to customers, as well as the timing of Distribution sales.
|
|
·
|
Receivables: We continue to generate positive operating cash flows and maintain strong collections on our accounts receivable. The following table illustrates our days sales outstanding from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013:
|
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months
|
$ | 22,984 | $ | 23,820 | ||||
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
$ | 15,411 | $ | 13,800 | ||||
|
Days Sales Outstanding
|
40 | 38 | ||||||
Investing Activities:
In fiscal year 2013, we invested $9.7 million in cash, of which $7.0 million was used for business acquisitions and $2.7 million was used to purchase property and equipment, primarily to support Service segment growth. In fiscal year 2012, we used $4.5 million of cash in investing activities, including $3.1 million for business acquisitions and $1.4 million to purchase property and equipment primarily for additional service capabilities and infrastructure projects.
Financing Activities:
During fiscal year 2013, we received $4.8 million in cash from financing activities, including $4.7 million from our revolving line of credit and $0.2 million from the issuance of common stock through the exercise of stock options. We used $1.8 million in cash for financing activities in fiscal year 2012, including $1.9 million to reduce our revolving line of credit and $0.2 million to repurchase shares of common stock. In addition, we received $0.4 million of cash in fiscal year 2012 from the issuance of common stock through the exercise of stock options and warrants.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments.
The table below contains aggregated information about future payments related to contractual obligations and commercial commitments such as debt and lease agreements (in millions):
|
Payments Due By Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Less Than
|
1-3 | 3-5 |
More than
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
1 Year
|
Years
|
Years
|
5 Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revolving Line of Credit (1)
|
$ | - | $ | 8.0 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 8.0 | ||||||||||
|
Operating Leases
|
1.6 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 6.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
$ | 1.6 | $ | 10.4 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 14.4 | ||||||||||
(1) Due to the uncertainty of forecasting expected variable rate interest payments, this amount excludes the interest portion of the debt obligation.
OUTLOOK
The deepening of our geographic reach and expansion of our capabilities in our Services segment should continue to drive growth, margin expansion and cash flow generation in fiscal year 2014. In addition, we expect to realize the full year impact of our fiscal year 2013 acquisitions, our expanded focus on strategic business development and the benefit of investments made in our sales organization. We expect this will more than offset an increasingly price competitive marketplace for our Distribution segment and a stagnant economy. We expect that we will experience disproportionately higher year-over-year operating income growth in our second and third quarters of fiscal year 2014.
The successful implementation of our strategies has resulted in revenue growth of nearly 60% and earnings per share growth of over 50% in the last five years. While maintaining our position as the premier source for the highest quality test and measurement instruments, we believe we are making measureable headway in capturing a greater share of the calibration services market. Looking ahead, we believe we can continue to grow our top line, leverage our infrastructure and further strengthen our earnings power.
23
INTEREST RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowing activities. In the event interest rates were to move by 1%, our yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less than $0.1 million assuming our average borrowing levels remained constant. As of March 30, 2013, $20.0 million was available under our credit facility, of which $8.0 million was outstanding and included in long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
We mitigate our interest rate risk by electing to borrow from our credit facility at the one-month LIBOR, adjusting daily, or a fixed rate for a designated period at the LIBOR corresponding to such period, in each case, plus a margin. Our interest rate margin is determined on a quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio. As of March 30, 2013, the one-month LIBOR was 0.2%. Our interest rate for fiscal year 2013 ranged from 1.1% to 2.8%. On March 30, 2013, we had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to upward movements in interest rates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Over 90% of our revenues for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 were denominated in U.S. dollars, with the remainder denominated in Canadian dollars. A 10% change in the value of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would impact our revenue by less than 1%. We monitor the relationship between the U.S. and Canadian currencies on a monthly basis and adjust sales prices for products and services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to be appropriate.
We utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that future earnings would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. We do not apply hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled less than $0.1 million in each of fiscal years 2013 and 2012, was recognized as a component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair value on the underlying receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On March 30, 2013, we had two foreign exchange contracts, which mature in April 2013 and January 2014, outstanding in the notional amounts of $4.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively. We do not use hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
24
INDEX
|
Page(s)
|
||
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
||
25
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Transcat, Inc.
Rochester, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the fiscal years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C.
Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C.
Buffalo, New York
June 26, 2013
26
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Distribution Sales
|
$ | 71,641 | $ | 73,614 | ||||
|
Service Revenue
|
40,655 | 36,406 | ||||||
|
Total Revenue
|
112,296 | 110,020 | ||||||
|
Cost of Distribution Sales
|
54,539 | 55,110 | ||||||
|
Cost of Services Sold
|
30,353 | 27,786 | ||||||
|
Total Cost of Revenue
|
84,892 | 82,896 | ||||||
|
Gross Profit
|
27,404 | 27,124 | ||||||
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses
|
13,001 | 13,751 | ||||||
|
Administrative Expenses
|
8,457 | 7,945 | ||||||
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
21,458 | 21,696 | ||||||
|
Operating Income
|
5,946 | 5,428 | ||||||
|
Interest and Other Expense, net
|
228 | 182 | ||||||
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
5,718 | 5,246 | ||||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
2,014 | 1,944 | ||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 3,704 | $ | 3,302 | ||||
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.45 | ||||
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
7,404 | 7,309 | ||||||
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.49 | $ | 0.43 | ||||
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
7,592 | 7,651 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 3,704 | $ | 3,302 | ||||
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
||||||||
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
2 | (9 | ) | |||||
|
Unrecognized Prior Service Cost, net of tax
|
1 | (32 | ) | |||||
|
Unrealized Gain on Other Asset, net of tax
|
30 | 4 | ||||||
| 33 | (37 | ) | ||||||
|
Comprehensive Income
|
$ | 3,737 | $ | 3,265 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Current Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash
|
$ | 406 | $ | 32 | ||||
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $118
and $99 as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively
|
15,411 | 13,800 | ||||||
|
Other Receivables
|
977 | 845 | ||||||
|
Inventory, net
|
6,803 | 6,396 | ||||||
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
1,134 | 1,064 | ||||||
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
1,087 | 1,041 | ||||||
|
Total Current Assets
|
25,818 | 23,178 | ||||||
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
6,885 | 5,306 | ||||||
|
Goodwill
|
17,592 | 13,390 | ||||||
|
Intangible Assets, net
|
3,691 | 2,449 | ||||||
|
Other Assets
|
1,061 | 654 | ||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$ | 55,047 | $ | 44,977 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Current Liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts Payable
|
$ | 8,883 | $ | 7,516 | ||||
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities
|
3,979 | 5,171 | ||||||
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
465 | 366 | ||||||
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
13,327 | 13,053 | ||||||
|
Long-Term Debt
|
8,017 | 3,365 | ||||||
|
Deferred Tax Liability
|
551 | 139 | ||||||
|
Other Liabilities
|
1,502 | 1,042 | ||||||
|
Total Liabilities
|
23,397 | 17,599 | ||||||
|
Shareholders' Equity:
|
||||||||
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
7,423,507 and 7,840,994 shares issued as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively; 7,423,507 and 7,341,007 shares outstanding as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively
|
3,712 | 3,920 | ||||||
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
10,616 | 10,810 | ||||||
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
481 | 448 | ||||||
|
Retained Earnings
|
16,841 | 14,394 | ||||||
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 498,782 shares as of March 31, 2012
|
- | (2,194 | ) | |||||
|
Total Shareholders' Equity
|
31,650 | 27,378 | ||||||
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
$ | 55,047 | $ | 44,977 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 3,704 | $ | 3,302 | ||||
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
43 | 91 | ||||||
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
2,702 | 2,896 | ||||||
|
Provision for Accounts Receivable and Inventory Reserves
|
162 | 76 | ||||||
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
|
343 | 553 | ||||||
|
Change in Contingent Consideration
|
- | (50 | ) | |||||
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
|
(842 | ) | (1,981 | ) | ||||
|
Inventory
|
(294 | ) | 989 | |||||
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
|
(914 | ) | (863 | ) | ||||
|
Accounts Payable
|
1,389 | (681 | ) | |||||
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities
|
(1,070 | ) | 1,811 | |||||
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
18 | 116 | ||||||
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
5,241 | 6,259 | ||||||
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment
|
(2,657 | ) | (1,391 | ) | ||||
|
Business Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
(7,029 | ) | (3,122 | ) | ||||
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(9,686 | ) | (4,513 | ) | ||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
|
Proceeds from (Repayment of) Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
4,652 | (1,888 | ) | |||||
|
Payment of Contingent Consideration
|
(72 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
239 | 436 | ||||||
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
(110 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||
|
Excess Tax Benefits Related to Stock-Based Compensation
|
63 | 42 | ||||||
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
4,772 | (1,751 | ) | |||||
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
47 | 5 | ||||||
|
Net Increase in Cash
|
374 | - | ||||||
|
Cash at Beginning of Fiscal Year
|
32 | 32 | ||||||
|
Cash at End of Fiscal Year
|
$ | 406 | $ | 32 | ||||
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Activity:
|
||||||||
|
Cash paid during the fiscal year for:
|
||||||||
|
Interest
|
$ | 118 | $ | 131 | ||||
|
Income Taxes, net
|
$ | 1,890 | $ | 1,693 | ||||
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
|
Contingent Consideration Related to Business Acquisition
|
$ | - | $ | 100 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands)
|
Common Stock
Issued
|
Capital
In
|
Accum-
ulated
|
Retained
|
Treasury Stock
Outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Value
|
Income
|
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of March 26, 2011
|
7,759 | $ | 3,880 | $ | 10,066 | $ | 485 | $ | 11,092 | 499 | $ | (2,194 | ) | $ | 23,329 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
84 | 42 | 394 | 436 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
(21 | ) | (11 | ) | (236 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
408 | 408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restricted Stock
|
18 | 9 | 136 | 145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax Benefit from Stock-
Based Compensation
|
42 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
(37 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
3,302 | 3,302 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of March 31, 2012
|
7,840 | 3,920 | 10,810 | 448 | 14,394 | 499 | (2,194 | ) | 27,378 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
46 | 23 | 216 | 239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Retirement of Treasury Stock
|
(498 | ) | (249 | ) | (763 | ) | (1,182 | ) | (499 | ) | 2,194 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
(16 | ) | (8 | ) | (27 | ) | (75 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
52 | 26 | 317 | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tax Benefit from Stock-
Based Compensation
|
63 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Comprehensive Gain
|
33 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
3,704 | 3,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of March 30, 2013
|
7,424 | $ | 3,712 | $ | 10,616 | $ | 481 | $ | 16,841 | - | $ | - | $ | 31,650 | ||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
31
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Description of Business:
Transcat, Inc. (“Transcat” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of accredited calibration, repair, inspection and compliance services and distributor of professional grade handheld test, measurement and control instrumentation primarily for pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated, industrial manufacturing, energy and utilities, chemical process, and other industries.
Principles of Consolidation:
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Transcat include the accounts of Transcat, Inc. and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Transmation (Canada) Inc., United Scale & Engineering Corporation, WTT Real Estate Acquisition, LLC and Anacor Acquisition, LLC (“Anacor Acquisition”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of Transcat’s Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts and returns, inventory reserves, probability of achievement for performance-based restricted stock units, depreciable lives of fixed assets and estimated lives of major catalogs and intangible assets. Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, accounting estimates require the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as the operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal Year:
Transcat operates on a 52/53 week fiscal year, ending the last Saturday in March. In a 52-week fiscal year, each of the four quarters is a 13-week period. In a 53-week fiscal year, the last quarter is a 14-week period. The fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 (“fiscal year 2013”) consisted of 52 weeks. The fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 (“fiscal year 2012”) consisted of 53 weeks.
Accounts Receivable:
Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. Transcat applies a specific formula to its accounts receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of revenue and/or the historical rate of returns.
Inventory:
Inventory consists of products purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost or market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories of inventory. The Company evaluates the adequacy of the reserve on a quarterly basis. At March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the Company had reserves for inventory losses totaling $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Property and Equipment, Depreciation and Amortization:
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily under the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
Years
|
|||
|
Machinery, Equipment and Software
|
2 | – |
15
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
3
|
–
|
10
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
2
|
–
|
10
|
|
Buildings
|
39
|
||
32
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written off at their then remaining net book value. Transcat capitalizes certain costs incurred in the procurement and development of computer software used for internal purposes. Leasehold improvements are amortized under the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 for further information on property and equipment.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets:
Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of an acquired business. Other intangible assets, namely customer base and covenants not to compete, represent an allocation of purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of an acquired business. The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units using the fair market value measurement requirement.
During fiscal year 2012, the Company implemented Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (“ASU 2011-08”). This standard simplified how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment and allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under ASU 2011-08, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions indicate that such impairment could exist. Other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company determined that no impairment was indicated as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012.
A summary of changes in the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets is as follows:
|
Goodwill
|
Intangible Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distribution
|
Service
|
Total
|
Distribution
|
Service
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Book Value as of March 26, 2011
|
$ | 8,031 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 11,666 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 913 | $ | 1,982 | ||||||||||||
|
Additions (see Note 9)
|
- | 1,728 | 1,728 | - | 1,206 | 1,206 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
|
- | - | - | (345 | ) | (392 | ) | (737 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
- | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Net Book Value as of March 31, 2012
|
8,031 | 5,359 | 13,390 | 724 | 1,725 | 2,449 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Additions (see Note 9)
|
- | 4,234 | 4,234 | - | 2,062 | 2,062 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization
|
- | - | - | (239 | ) | (563 | ) | (802 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
- | (32 | ) | (32 | ) | - | (18 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Net Book Value as of March 30, 2013
|
$ | 8,031 | $ | 9,561 | $ | 17,592 | $ | 485 | $ | 3,206 | 3,691 | |||||||||||||
The intangible assets are being amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful life of up to 10 years. Amortization expense relating to intangible assets is expected to be $1.0 million in the fiscal year ending March 29, 2014 (“fiscal year 2014”), $0.8 million in fiscal year 2015, $0.6 million in fiscal year 2016, $0.5 million in fiscal year 2017 and $0.3 million in fiscal year 2018.
Catalog Costs:
Transcat capitalizes the cost of each Master Catalog mailed and amortizes the cost over the respective catalog’s estimated productive life. The Company reviews response results from catalog mailings on a continuous basis, and if warranted, modifies the period over which costs are recognized. The Company amortizes the cost of each Master Catalog over an eighteen month period and amortizes the cost of each catalog supplement over a three month period. Total unamortized catalog costs, included as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $0.3 million as of March 30, 2013 and $0.4 million as of March 31, 2012.
Deferred Taxes:
Transcat accounts for certain income and expense items differently for financial reporting purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. If necessary, a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is provided for items for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of such items will not be realized based on an assessment of both positive and negative evidence. See Note 4 for further discussion on income taxes.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
Transcat has determined the fair value of debt and other financial instruments using a valuation hierarchy. The hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value, consists of three levels. Level 1 uses observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2 uses inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, which is defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. The carrying amount of debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to variable interest rate pricing, and the carrying amounts for cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. Investment assets, which fund the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan, consist of mutual funds and are valued based on Level 1 inputs. At March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, investment assets totaled $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and are included as a component of other assets (non-current) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
33
Stock-Based Compensation:
The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for all equity awards granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock units, based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. The Company records compensation cost related to unvested equity awards by recognizing, on a straight line basis, the unamortized grant date fair value over the remaining service period of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of equity awards are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. The Company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation costs as part of an asset. The Company estimates forfeiture rates based on its historical experience. During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded non-cash stock-based compensation cost in the amount of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenue Recognition:
Distribution sales are recorded when an order’s title and risk of loss transfers to the customer. The Company recognizes the majority of its service revenue based upon when the calibration or other activity is performed and then shipped and/or delivered to the customer. Some service revenue is generated from managing customers’ calibration programs in which the Company recognizes revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals. The Company generally invoices its customers for freight, shipping, and handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the related revenue is recorded based upon historical data.
Vendor Rebates:
Vendor rebates are based on a specified cumulative level of purchases and incremental distribution sales and are recorded as a reduction of cost of distribution sales. Purchase rebates are calculated and recorded quarterly based upon our volume of purchases with specific vendors during the quarter. Point of sale rebate programs are based upon annual year-over-year sales performance on a calendar year basis and are recorded as earned, on a quarterly basis, based upon the expected level of annual achievement.
Cooperative Advertising Income:
Transcat records cash consideration received from a vendor for advertising as a reduction of cost of distribution sales as the related inventory is sold. The Company recorded, as a reduction of cost of distribution sales, consideration in the amount of $1.8 million and $1.4 million in fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs:
Freight expense and direct shipping costs are included in the cost of revenue. These costs were approximately $1.8 million and $1.9 million for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively. Direct handling costs, the majority of which represent direct compensation of employees who pick, pack, and otherwise prepare, if necessary, merchandise for shipment to customers, are reflected in selling, marketing and warehouse expenses. These costs were $0.8 million in each of the fiscal years ended 2013 and 2012.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions:
The accounts of Transmation (Canada) Inc.ears 2004 and 2005evedative level of purchases andual amounts at fixed intervals. activity is performed the shipped and are maintained in the local currency and have been translated to U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and liabilities, have been translated at the period-end rates of exchange and related revenue and expense accounts have been translated at an average rate of exchange during the period. Gains and losses arising from translation of Transmation (Canada) Inc.’s balance sheets into U.S. dollars are recorded directly to the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian business transactions. The net foreign currency loss was less than $0.1 million for each of the fiscal years 2013 and 2012. The Company utilizes foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that its earnings would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The Company does not apply hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled less than $0.1 million in each of the fiscal years 2013 and 2012, was recognized as a component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair value on the underlying accounts receivables denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On March 30, 2013, the Company had two foreign exchange contracts, which mature in April 2013 and January 2014, outstanding in the notional amounts of $4.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The Company does not use hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
Comprehensive Income:
Other comprehensive income is comprised of net income, currency translation adjustments, unrecognized prior service costs, net of tax and unrealized gains on other assets, net of tax. At March 30, 2013, accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of cumulative currency translation gains of $0.6 million, unrecognized prior service costs, net of tax, of $0.2 million and an unrealized gain on other assets, net of tax, of less than $0.1 million. At March 31, 2012, accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of cumulative currency translation gains of $0.6 million, unrecognized prior service costs, net of tax, of $0.2 million and an unrealized gain on other assets, net of tax, of less than $0.1 million.
34
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”). This standard requires entities to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The Company implemented ASU 2013-02 effective December 29, 2012 and there was no impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share of common stock reflect the assumed conversion of stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock units using the treasury stock method in periods in which they have a dilutive effect. In computing the per share effect of assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from the exercise of options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock units and the related tax benefits are considered to have been used to purchase shares of common stock at the average market prices during the period, and the resulting net additional shares of common stock are included in the calculation of average shares of common stock outstanding.
For fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the net additional common stock equivalents had a $.01 and $.02 per share effect, respectively, on the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. The average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Average Shares Outstanding – Basic
|
7,404 | 7,309 | ||||||
|
Effect of Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents
|
188 | 342 | ||||||
|
Average Shares Outstanding – Diluted
|
7,592 | 7,651 | ||||||
|
Anti-dilutive Common Stock Equivalents
|
464 | 398 | ||||||
Reclassification of Amounts:
Certain reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal years have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal year.
Property and equipment consist of:
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Machinery, Equipment and Software
|
$ | 21,661 | $ | 19,199 | ||||
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
2,065 | 1,989 | ||||||
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
1,544 | 1,333 | ||||||
|
Buildings and Land
|
675 | 675 | ||||||
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
25,945 | 23,196 | ||||||
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
|
(19,060 | ) | (17,890 | ) | ||||
|
Total Property and Equipment, net
|
$ | 6,885 | $ | 5,306 | ||||
Total depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $1.4 million in fiscal year 2013 and $1.6 million in fiscal year 2012.
Description.
On September 20, 2012, Transcat entered into a credit agreement with Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (the “M&T Credit Agreement”). The M&T Credit Agreement provides for a three-year revolving credit facility in the amount of $20.0 million (the “M&T Revolving Credit Facility”) and replaced the credit agreement dated as of November 20, 2006, as amended, with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Chase Credit Agreement”). As of March 30, 2013, $8.0 million was outstanding under the M&T Revolving Credit Facility and is included in long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
35
Interest and Other Costs.
Interest on the M&T Revolving Credit Facility accrues, at Transcat’s election, at either the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), adjusting daily, or a fixed rate for a designated period at the LIBOR corresponding to such period, in each case, plus a margin. Commitment fees accrue based on the average daily amount of unused credit available on the M&T Revolving Credit Facility. Commitment fees and interest rate margins are determined on a quarterly basis based upon the Company’s calculated leverage ratio, as defined in the M&T Credit Agreement. The one-month LIBOR as of March 30, 2013 was 0.2%. The Company’s interest rate for fiscal year 2013, including interest associated with the Chase Credit Agreement, ranged from 1.1% to 2.8%.
Covenants.
The M&T Credit Agreement has certain covenants with which the Company has to comply, including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a leverage ratio covenant. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants and requirements, including those associated with the Chase Credit Agreement, throughout fiscal year 2013.
Loan Costs.
Costs associated with the M&T Credit Agreement, totaling less than $0.1 million, are being amortized over the term of the agreement. On September 20, 2012, unamortized costs associated with the Chase Credit Agreement totaling less than $0.1 million were written off and recorded as interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Other Terms.
The Company has pledged all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property, the equity interests of its U.S.-based subsidiaries, and a majority of the common stock of Transmation (Canada) Inc. as collateral security for the loans made under the M&T Revolving Credit Facility.
Transcat’s net income before income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
United States
|
$ | 6,188 | $ | 5,679 | ||||
|
Foreign
|
(470 | ) | (433 | ) | ||||
|
Total
|
$ | 5,718 | $ | 5,246 | ||||
The net provision for income taxes for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Current Tax Provision:
|
||||||||
|
Federal
|
$ | 1,701 | $ | 1,685 | ||||
|
State
|
270 | 168 | ||||||
| 1,971 | 1,853 | |||||||
|
Deferred Tax Provision (Benefit):
|
||||||||
|
Federal
|
113 | 117 | ||||||
|
State
|
(70 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||
| 43 | 91 | |||||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
$ | 2,014 | $ | 1,944 | ||||
A reconciliation of the income tax provision computed by applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate and the income tax provision reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Federal Income Tax at Statutory Rate
|
$ | 1,944 | $ | 1,784 | ||||
|
State Income Taxes, net of Federal benefit
|
229 | 210 | ||||||
|
Other, net
|
(159 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,014 | $ | 1,944 | ||||
36
The components of the net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
$ | 333 | $ | 306 | ||||
|
Performance-Based Grants
|
483 | 476 | ||||||
|
Other
|
271 | 259 | ||||||
|
Total Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
1,087 | 1,041 | ||||||
|
Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities):
|
||||||||
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
|
(1,449 | ) | (1,129 | ) | ||||
|
Depreciation
|
(777 | ) | (475 | ) | ||||
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
780 | 794 | ||||||
|
Other Liabilities
|
556 | 377 | ||||||
|
Foreign Tax Credits
|
- | 36 | ||||||
|
Other
|
339 | 258 | ||||||
|
Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
(551 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
$ | 536 | $ | 902 | ||||
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis differences related to the investments in the Company’s foreign subsidiary. The Company considers undistributed earnings, if any, as permanently reinvested in the subsidiary. Therefore, the determination of a deferred tax liability on unremitted earnings would not be practicable because such liability, if any, would depend on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs. At March 30, 2013, there were no undistributed earnings. As of March 30, 2013, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards, relating to its foreign subsidiary, of $0.9 million, which are available to offset future taxable income of the subsidiary through March 2033.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and Canada. The Company is no longer subject to examination by U.S. federal income tax authorities for the fiscal years 2009 and prior, by state tax authorities for the fiscal years 2007 and prior, and by Canadian tax authorities for the fiscal years 2005 and prior. There are no tax years currently under examination by U.S. federal, state or Canadian tax authorities.
During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, there were no uncertain tax positions, and the Company expects no material uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. No interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions were recognized in fiscal years 2013 and 2012 or were accrued at March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012.
Defined Contribution Plan.
All of Transcat’s U.S. based employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan, the Long-Term Savings and Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”), provided certain qualifications are met.
In the long-term savings portion of the Plan (the “401K Plan”), plan participants are entitled to a distribution of their vested account balance upon termination of employment or retirement. Plan participants are fully vested in their contributions while Company contributions are fully vested after three years of service. The Company’s matching contributions to the 401K Plan were $0.5 million in fiscal year 2013 and $0.4 million in fiscal year 2012.
In the deferred profit sharing portion of the Plan, Company contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company made no profit sharing contributions in fiscal years 2013 and 2012.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
The Company has available a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “NQDC Plan”) for directors and officers. Participants are fully vested in their contributions. At its discretion, the Company may elect to match employee contributions, subject to legal limitations in conjunction with the 401K Plan, which fully vest after three years of service. During each of the fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company made matching contributions of less than $0.1 million. Participant accounts are adjusted to reflect performance, whether positive or negative, of selected investment options chosen by each participant during the deferral period. In the event of bankruptcy, the assets of the NQDC Plan are available to satisfy the claims of general creditors. The liability for compensation deferred under the NQDC Plan was $0.6 million as of March 30, 2013 and $0.2 million as of March 31, 2012 and is included as a component of other liabilities (non-current) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Postretirement Health Care Plans.
The Company has a defined benefit postretirement health care plan which provides long-term care insurance benefits, medical and dental insurance benefits and medical premium reimbursement benefits to eligible retired corporate officers and their eligible spouses (the “Officer Plan”). The Company also had a defined benefit postretirement health care plan which provided limited reimbursement to eligible non-officer participants for the cost of individual medical insurance coverage (the “Non-Officer Plan”). During fiscal year 2012, the Non-Officer Plan was discontinued with benefits accrued only for employees who had met the plan’s eligibility requirements on or before March 31, 2012. The Company satisfied its obligation under the Non-Officer Plan by paying all remaining benefits, totaling less than $0.1 million, during fiscal year 2013.
37
The change in the postretirement benefit obligation is as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Postretirement benefit obligation, at beginning of fiscal year
|
$ | 780 | $ | 706 | ||||
|
Service cost
|
59 | 127 | ||||||
|
Interest cost
|
41 | 40 | ||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(68 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
|
Actuarial loss
|
75 | 71 | ||||||
|
Curtailment gain
|
- | (152 | ) | |||||
|
Postretirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal year
|
887 | 780 | ||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets, at end of fiscal year
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Funded status, at end of year
|
$ | (887 | ) | $ | (780 | ) | ||
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal year
|
$ | 887 | $ | 780 | ||||
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is included as a component of other liabilities (non-current) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost:
|
||||||||
|
Service cost
|
$ | 59 | $ | 127 | ||||
|
Interest cost
|
41 | 40 | ||||||
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
58 | 13 | ||||||
| 158 | 180 | |||||||
|
Benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
(58 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
|
Net loss
|
58 | 65 | ||||||
| - | 52 | |||||||
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and
other comprehensive income
|
$ | 158 | $ | 232 | ||||
|
Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income,
at end of fiscal year:
|
||||||||
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
$ | 258 | $ | 258 | ||||
The prior service cost is amortized over the average remaining life expectancy of active participants for the Officer Plan. The estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive gain into net periodic postretirement benefit cost during fiscal year 2014 is less than $0.1 million.
The postretirement benefit obligation was computed by an independent third party actuary. Assumptions used to determine the postretirement benefit obligation and the net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
|
March 30,
2013
|
March 31,
2012
|
|||||||
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
4.5 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||
|
Medical care cost trend rate:
|
||||||||
|
Trend rate assumed for next year
|
8.0 | % | 8.5 | % | ||||
|
Ultimate trend rate
|
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||
|
Year that rate reaches ultimate trend rate
|
2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|
Dental care cost trend rate:
|
||||||||
|
Trend rate assumed for next year and
remaining at that level thereafter
|
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||
38
Benefit payments are funded by the Company as needed. Payments toward the cost of a retiree’s medical and dental coverage are initially determined as a percentage of a base coverage plan in the year of retirement and are limited to increase at a rate of no more than 50% of the annual increase in medical and dental costs, as defined in the plan document. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:
|
Fiscal
Year
|
Amount
|
|||
|
2014
|
$ | 51 | ||
|
2015
|
57 | |||
|
2016
|
62 | |||
|
2017
|
62 | |||
|
2018
|
56 | |||
|
Thereafter
|
599 | |||
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage point would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic cost by $0.1 million. A one percentage point decrease in the healthcare cost trend would decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic cost by $0.1 million.
The Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (the “2003 Plan”), provides for, among other awards, grants of restricted stock units and stock options to directors, officers and key employees at the fair market value at the date of grant. At March 30, 2013, the number of shares available for future grant under the 2003 Plan totaled 0.2 million.
Restricted Stock:
The Company grants performance-based restricted stock units as a primary component of executive compensation. The units generally vest following the third fiscal year from the date of grant subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible period.
Compensation cost ultimately recognized for performance-based restricted stock units will equal the grant date fair market value of the unit that coincides with the actual outcome of the performance conditions. On an interim basis, the Company records compensation cost based on an assessment of the probability of achieving the performance conditions. The Company achieved 75% of the target level for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in the fiscal year ended March 27, 2010 and as a result, issued 52 thousand shares of common stock to executive officers and certain key employees during the first quarter of fiscal year 2013. At March 30, 2013, the Company achieved 75% of the target level for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in the fiscal year ended March 26, 2011 and estimated the probability of achievement for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in fiscal years 2013 and 2012 to be 100% and 125% of the target levels, respectively. Total expense relating to performance-based restricted stock units, based on grant date fair value and the achievement criteria, was $0.3 million in each of the fiscal years 2013 and 2012. Unearned compensation totaled $0.4 million as of March 30, 2013.
Stock Options:
Options generally vest over a period of up to four years, using either a graded schedule or on a straight-line basis, and expire ten years from the date of grant. The expense relating to options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
The following table summarizes the Company’s options for fiscal years 2013 and 2012:
|
Number
Of
|
Weighted
Average
|
Weighted
Average
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||||
|
Outstanding as of March 26, 2011
|
654 | $ | 5.77 | |||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(57 | ) | 3.98 | |||||||||||||
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2012
|
597 | 5.94 | ||||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
(21 | ) | 3.08 | |||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(22 | ) | 6.57 | |||||||||||||
|
Outstanding as of March 30, 2013
|
554 | 6.02 | 4 | $ | 505 | |||||||||||
|
Exercisable as of March 30, 2013
|
548 | 6.02 | 4 | 505 | ||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of fiscal year 2013 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options) that would have been received by the option holders had all holders exercised their options on March 30, 2013. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock.
39
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options as of March 30, 2013 was less than $0.1 million, which is expected to be recognized in less than one year. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised in fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was less than $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Cash received from the exercise of options was less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2013 and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2012.
Warrants:
Transcat maintained a warrant plan for directors (the “Directors’ Warrant Plan”). Under the Directors’ Warrant Plan, as amended, warrants were granted to non-employee directors to purchase common stock at the fair market value at the date of grant. All warrants authorized for issuance pursuant to the Directors’ Warrant Plan had been granted as of August 16, 2006.
The following
table summarizes the Company’s warrants
:
|
Number
Of
|
Weighted
Average
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding as of March 26, 2011
|
17 | 5.80 | ||||||
|
Exercised
|
(17 | ) | 5.80 | |||||
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2012
|
- | - | ||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of warrants exercised in fiscal year 2012 was $0.1 million. Cash received from the exercise of warrants was less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2012.
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution and Service. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described above in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has no inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment and geographic data for fiscal years 2013 and 2012:
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution
|
$ | 71,641 | $ | 73,614 | ||||
|
Service
|
40,655 | 36,406 | ||||||
|
Total
|
112,296 | 110,020 | ||||||
|
Gross Profit:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution
|
17,102 | 18,504 | ||||||
|
Service
|
10,302 | 8,620 | ||||||
|
Total
|
27,404 | 27,124 | ||||||
|
Operating Expenses:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution (1)
|
12,467 | 12,901 | ||||||
|
Service (1)
|
8,991 | 8,795 | ||||||
|
Total
|
21,458 | 21,696 | ||||||
|
Operating Income (Loss):
|
||||||||
|
Distribution (1)
|
4,635 | 5,603 | ||||||
|
Service (1)
|
1,311 | (175 | ) | |||||
|
Total
|
5,946 | 5,428 | ||||||
|
Unallocated Amounts:
|
||||||||
|
Interest and Other Expense, net
|
228 | 182 | ||||||
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
2,014 | 1,944 | ||||||
|
Total
|
2,242 | 2,126 | ||||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 3,704 | $ | 3,302 | ||||
40
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Total Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution
|
$ | 25,932 | $ | 25,531 | ||||
|
Service
|
24,785 | 16,428 | ||||||
|
Unallocated
|
4,330 | 3,018 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 55,047 | $ | 44,977 | ||||
|
Depreciation and Amortization (2):
|
||||||||
|
Distribution
|
$ | 962 | $ | 937 | ||||
|
Service
|
1,740 | 1,959 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,702 | $ | 2,896 | ||||
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
||||||||
|
Distribution
|
$ | 193 | $ | 248 | ||||
|
Service
|
2,464 | 1,143 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,657 | $ | 1,391 | ||||
|
Geographic Data:
|
||||||||
|
Revenues to Unaffiliated Customers (3):
|
||||||||
|
United States (4)
|
$ | 101,850 | $ | 99,848 | ||||
|
Canada
|
7,873 | 7,324 | ||||||
|
Other International
|
2,573 | 2,848 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 112,296 | $ | 110,020 | ||||
|
Long-Lived Assets:
|
||||||||
|
United States (4)
|
$ | 6,400 | $ | 5,081 | ||||
|
Canada
|
485 | 225 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 6,885 | $ | 5,306 | ||||
|
(1)
|
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on actual amounts, a percentage of revenues, headcount, and management’s estimates.
|
|
(2)
|
Including amortization of catalog costs.
|
|
(3)
|
Revenues are attributed to the countries based on the destination of a product shipment or the location where service is rendered.
|
|
(4)
|
United States includes Puerto Rico.
|
Leases:
Transcat leases facilities, equipment, and vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases. Total rental expense was approximately $1.8 million in fiscal year 2013 and $1.6 million in fiscal year 2012. The minimum future annual rental payments under the non-cancelable leases at March 30, 2013 are as follows (in millions):
|
Fiscal Year
|
||||
|
2014
|
$ | 1.6 | ||
|
2015
|
1.3 | |||
|
2016
|
1.1 | |||
|
2017
|
0.9 | |||
|
2018
|
0.6 | |||
|
Thereafter
|
0.9 | |||
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
$ | 6.4 | ||
41
The Company has engaged in a number of business acquisitions. During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, Transcat completed the following:
|
·
|
On January 25, 2013, the Company, through Transmation (Canada) Inc., acquired 7506155 Canada Inc. and its operating subsidiary, Cal-Matrix Metrology Inc. (collectively “Cal-Matrix”). Cal-Matrix is a provider of commercial and accredited calibration and coordinate measurement inspection services to customers throughout Canada and has locations in Burlington, Ontario and Montreal, Quebec.
|
|
·
|
On July 16, 2012, the Company, through Anacor Acquisition, acquired substantially all of the assets of Anacor Compliance Services, Inc. (“Anacor”), a nationally recognized provider of specialized analytical, calibration, validation and remediation services to the life science sector.
|
|
·
|
On September 8, 2011, the Company acquired the calibration services division of Newark Corporation (“Newark”), a provider of calibration and repair services to customers located primarily in Arizona, Colorado and Tennessee.
|
|
·
|
On April 5, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of CMC Instrument Services, Inc. (“CMC”), a Rochester, New York-based provider of dimensional calibration and repair services.
|
These transactions align with the Company’s acquisition strategy of targeting service businesses that expand the Company’s geographic reach and leverage its infrastructure while also increasing the depth and breadth of the Company’s service capabilities.
The acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the underlying net assets of the businesses acquired. Other intangible assets, namely customer base and covenants not to compete, represent an allocation of a portion of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of the acquired businesses. Intangible assets are being amortized for financial reporting purposes on an accelerated basis over the estimated useful life of up to 10 years. Goodwill and the intangible assets relating to the Anacor, Newark and CMC acquisitions are deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill and the intangible assets relating to the Cal-Matrix acquisition are not deductible for tax purposes.
The total purchase price paid for the businesses acquired in fiscal year 2013 was approximately $7.0 million. The following is a summary of the purchase price allocation, in the aggregate, for the businesses acquired in fiscal year 2013:
Allocation of Purchase Price:
|
Goodwill
|
$ | 4,234 | |||
|
Intangible Assets – Customer Base
|
1,493 | ||||
|
Intangible Assets – Covenants Not to Compete
|
569 | ||||
|
Deferred Tax Liability
|
(375 | ) | |||
| 5,921 | |||||
|
Plus:
|
Current Assets
|
1,184 | |||
|
Non-Current Assets
|
331 | ||||
|
Less:
|
Current Liabilities
|
(407 | ) | ||
|
Total Purchase Price
|
$ | 7,029 | |||
The total purchase price paid for the businesses acquired in fiscal year 2012 was approximately $3.1 million, with $1.7 million and $1.2 million allocated to goodwill and intangible assets, respectively. Acquisition costs of $0.4 million in fiscal year 2013 and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2012 were recorded as incurred as an administrative expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in Transcat’s consolidated operating results as of the date the businesses were acquired. The following unaudited pro forma information presents the Company’s results of operations as if the business acquisitions completed in fiscal year 2013 had occurred at the beginning of each period presented. The unaudited pro forma information does not include the business acquisitions completed in fiscal year 2012 as the impact of those acquisitions was not considered significant. The pro forma results do not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations actually would have been if the transactions set forth had occurred on the date indicated or what the Company’s results of operations will be in future periods.
42
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
|
FY 2013
|
FY 2012
|
|||||||
|
Total Revenue
|
$ | 115,708 | $ | 115,783 | ||||
|
Net Income
|
$ | 4,382 | $ | 3,996 | ||||
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.59 | $ | 0.55 | ||||
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.52 | ||||
In connection with certain business acquisitions consummated prior to fiscal year 2012, the Company entered into earn out agreements with the former owners of the acquired businesses. These agreements entitled the former owners to receive earn out payments subject to continued employment and certain post-closing financial targets, as defined in the agreements. Payments earned and recorded as compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations totaled $0.1 million in fiscal year 2013 and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2012. There was no unpaid earn out consideration as of March 30, 2013.
Certain of the Company’s business acquisitions contain holdback provisions, as defined in the respective purchase agreements. The Company accrues contingent consideration relating to the holdback provisions based on their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. The Company paid less than $0.1 million in contingent consideration in each of the fiscal years 2013 and 2012. There was no unpaid contingent consideration as of March 30, 2013.
The following table presents a summary of certain unaudited quarterly financial data for fiscal years 2013 and 2012:
|
Total
Revenues
|
Gross
Profit
|
Net
Income
|
Basic
Earnings
|
Diluted
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
|
FY 2013:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 31,087 | $ | 8,489 | $ | 1,816 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||||
|
Third Quarter
|
29,324 | 6,630 | 782 | 0.11 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
|
Second Quarter
|
26,788 | 6,078 | 745 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
25,097 | 6,207 | 361 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
|
FY 2012:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 30,772 | $ | 7,885 | $ | 1 ,207 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||||
|
Third Quarter
|
28,460 | 6,788 | 1,024 | 0.14 | 0.13 | |||||||||||||||
|
Second Quarter
|
25,183 | 6,153 | 746 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
25,605 | 6,298 | 325 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||||
|
(a)
|
Earnings per share calculations for each quarter include the weighted average effect of stock issuances and common stock equivalents for the quarter; therefore, the sum of quarterly earnings per share amounts may not equal full-year earnings per share amounts, which reflect the weighted average effect on an annual basis. Diluted earnings per share calculations for each quarter include the effect of stock options, warrants and non-vested restricted stock units, when dilutive to the quarter. In addition, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share may not add due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||
43
None.
(a)
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
(b)
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. In designing and evaluating our internal control system, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and that the effectiveness of any system has inherent limitations including, but not limited to, the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures. Management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, is required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected in a timely manner.
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our procedures and internal control over financial reporting using the framework and criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of March 30, 2013.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
(c)
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by this annual report (our fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Not applicable.
The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance,” “Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 30, 2013 fiscal year end.
44
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 30, 2013 fiscal year end.
With the exception of the information presented in the table below, the information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Security Ownership of Management,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 30, 2013 fiscal year end.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of March 30, 2013:
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
||||||||||||
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
||||||||||||
|
Number of securities
|
||||||||||||
|
Number of securities
|
remaining available
|
|||||||||||
|
to be issued
|
Weighted average
|
for future issuance under
|
||||||||||
|
upon exercise of
|
exercise price of
|
equity compensation plans
|
||||||||||
|
outstanding options,
|
outstanding options,
|
(excluding securities
|
||||||||||
|
Plan category
|
warrants and rights
|
warrants and rights
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|||||||||
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
652 | (1) | $ | 5.12 | 175 | |||||||
|
Equity compensation plans
not approved by security holders
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
Total
|
652 | $ | 5.12 | 175 | ||||||||
| (1) |
Includes performance-based restricted stock units granted to officers and key employees pursuant to our 2003 Incentive Plan. See Note 6 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II.
|
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the headings “Corporate Governance” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 30, 2013 fiscal year end.
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the heading “Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the March 30, 2013 fiscal year end.
|
(a)
|
See Index to Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.
|
|
(b)
|
Exhibits.
|
See Index to Exhibits contained in this report.
45
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
|
|
Date:
June 26
, 2013
|
/s/ Charles P. Hadeed
|
|
By:
|
Charles P. Hadeed
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Date
|
Signature
|
Title
|
||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Charles P. Hadeed
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
Charles P. Hadeed
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ John J. Zimmer
|
Senior Vice President of Finance and
|
||
|
John J. Zimmer
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|||
|
(Principal Financial Officer and
|
||||
|
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Carl E. Sassano
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
||
|
Carl E. Sassano
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Francis R. Bradley
|
Director
|
||
|
Francis R. Bradley
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Richard J. Harrison
|
Director
|
||
|
Richard J. Harrison
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Nancy D. Hessler
|
Director
|
||
|
Nancy D. Hessler
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Paul D. Moore
|
Director
|
||
|
Paul D. Moore
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Harvey J. Palmer
|
Director
|
||
|
Harvey J. Palmer
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ Alan H. Resnick
|
Director
|
||
|
Alan H. Resnick
|
||||
|
June 26, 2013
|
/s/ John T. Smith
|
Director
|
||
|
John T. Smith
|
46
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
(3)
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
|
||
|
3.1
|
The Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-61665) filed on August 8, 1995 and from Exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.
|
||
|
3.1
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
|
||
|
3.2
|
Code of Regulations, as amended through October 26, 2009, are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2009.
|
||
|
(10)
|
Material contracts
|
||
|
#
|
10.1
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix D to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on July 10, 2006 in connection with the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
#
|
10.2
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on July 22, 2011 in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
#
|
10.3
|
Form of Award Notice for Incentive Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
#
|
10.4
|
Form of Award Notice for Restricted Stock granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
#
|
10.5
|
Form of Award Notice for Non-Qualified Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 24, 2005.
|
|
|
#
|
10.6
|
Form of Award Notice for Performance-Based Restricted Stock granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2009.
|
|
|
*#
|
10.7
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated.
|
|
|
10.8
|
Credit Agreement dated as of November 21, 2006 by and between Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006.
|
||
|
10.9
|
Amendment Number One to Credit Agreement dated as of August 14, 2008 between Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008.
|
||
|
10.10
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated February 26, 2010 between Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 27, 2010.
|
||
47
|
10.11
|
Amendment Number Three to Credit Agreement dated as of January 15, 2011 between Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 26, 2011.
|
||
|
10.12
|
Credit Facility Agreement dated as of September 20, 2012 by and between Transcat, Inc. and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2012.
|
||
|
10.13
|
Master Security Agreement dated September 20, 2012 by and between Transcat, Inc., United Scale & Engineering Corporation, WTT Real Estate Acquisition, LLC, Anacor Acquisition, LLC and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2012.
|
||
|
10.14
|
Lease Addendum between Gallina Development Corporation and Transcat, Inc. dated June 2, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008.
|
||
|
#
|
10.15
|
Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for Officers (Amended and Restated Effective April 2, 2012) is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.
|
|
|
#
|
10.16
|
Certain compensation information for Lee D. Rudow, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2011.
|
|
|
#
|
10.17
|
Certain compensation information for Lee D. Rudow, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2012.
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
Transcat, Inc. Executive Officer and Director Share Repurchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2011.
|
|
|
10.19
|
Transcat, Inc. 2009 Insider Stock Sales Plan, as amended is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
|
||
|
#
|
10.20
|
Agreement for Severance Upon Change in Control between Transcat, Inc. and Lee D. Rudow dated as of May 7, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2012.
|
|
|
#
|
10.21
|
Agreement for Severance Upon Change in Control between Transcat, Inc. and Charles P. Hadeed, as amended and restated, dated as of May 7, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
|
|
|
*#
|
10.22
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Charles P. Hadeed dated as of April 1, 2013.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings
|
||
|
Computation can be clearly determined from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income included in this Form 10-K under Item 8.
|
|||
|
(16)
|
Letter re change in certifying accountant
|
||
|
16.1
|
Letter from BDO USA, LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated September 19, 2011 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2011.
|
||
|
(21)
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
||
|
*
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
48
|
(23)
|
Consents of experts and counsel
|
||
|
*
|
23.1
|
Consent of Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C.
|
|
|
(31)
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
|
||
|
*
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
*
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
(32)
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
||
|
*
|
32.1
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
(101)
|
Interactive Data File
|
||
|
**
|
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
|
||
|
**
|
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
||
|
**
|
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
||
|
**
|
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
||
|
**
|
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
||
|
**
|
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
||
| _____________________________________ | |||
|
*
|
Exhibit filed with this report.
|
||
|
#
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
||
|
**
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in this exhibit is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
|
||
49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataNote 1 GeneralNote 2 Property and EquipmentNote 3 DebtNote 4 Income TaxesNote 5 Employee Benefit PlansNote 6 Stock-based CompensationNote 7 Segment and Geographic DataNote 8 CommitmentsNote 9 Business AcquisitionsNote 10 Quarterly Data (unaudited)Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceItem 14. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules