UNDER ARMOUR, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________
Form 10-Q
______________________________________
(Mark One)
|
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2013
or
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-33202
______________________________________
UNDER ARMOUR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
______________________________________
|
Maryland
|
|
52-1990078
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
1020 Hull Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21230
|
|
(410) 454-6428
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
|
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
______________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer
|
þ
|
Accelerated filer
|
¨
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Smaller reporting company
|
¨
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
þ
As of
March 31, 2013
, there were 84,092,773 shares of Class A Common Stock and 20,975,000 shares of Class B Convertible Common Stock outstanding.
UNDER ARMOUR, INC.
March 31, 2013
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
|
PART I.
|
||
|
Item 1.
|
||
|
Item 2.
|
||
|
Item 3.
|
||
|
Item 4.
|
||
|
PART II.
|
||
|
Item 1A.
|
||
|
Item 6.
|
||
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except share data)
|
March 31,
2013 |
December 31,
2012 |
March 31,
2012 |
|||||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||
|
Current assets
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
255,722
|
|
$
|
341,841
|
|
$
|
107,052
|
|
||
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
246,218
|
|
175,524
|
|
196,411
|
|
|||||
|
Inventories
|
323,509
|
|
319,286
|
|
324,354
|
|
|||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
37,227
|
|
43,896
|
|
47,121
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
24,765
|
|
23,051
|
|
19,164
|
|
|||||
|
Total current assets
|
887,441
|
|
903,598
|
|
694,102
|
|
|||||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
180,591
|
|
180,850
|
|
158,482
|
|
|||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
3,842
|
|
4,483
|
|
4,648
|
|
|||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
26,281
|
|
22,606
|
|
15,461
|
|
|||||
|
Other long term assets
|
42,333
|
|
45,546
|
|
47,544
|
|
|||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,140,488
|
|
$
|
1,157,083
|
|
$
|
920,237
|
|
||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|||||||||||
|
Current liabilities
|
|||||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
127,327
|
|
143,689
|
|
95,844
|
|
|||||
|
Accrued expenses
|
66,969
|
|
85,077
|
|
40,970
|
|
|||||
|
Current maturities of long term debt
|
8,787
|
|
9,132
|
|
43,330
|
|
|||||
|
Other current liabilities
|
3,246
|
|
14,330
|
|
2,550
|
|
|||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
206,329
|
|
252,228
|
|
182,694
|
|
|||||
|
Long term debt, net of current maturities
|
51,658
|
|
52,757
|
|
32,451
|
|
|||||
|
Other long term liabilities
|
39,343
|
|
35,176
|
|
31,004
|
|
|||||
|
Total liabilities
|
297,330
|
|
340,161
|
|
246,149
|
|
|||||
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 4)
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|||||||||||
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.0003 1/3 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2012; 84,092,773 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2013, 83,461,106 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 82,002,002 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012
|
28
|
|
28
|
|
27
|
|
|||||
|
Class B Convertible Common Stock, $0.0003 1/3 par value; 20,975,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2013, 21,300,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 22,200,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
|||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
342,153
|
|
321,338
|
|
291,644
|
|
|||||
|
Retained earnings
|
500,946
|
|
493,181
|
|
380,248
|
|
|||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
24
|
|
2,368
|
|
2,162
|
|
|||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
843,158
|
|
816,922
|
|
674,088
|
|
|||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
1,140,488
|
|
$
|
1,157,083
|
|
$
|
920,237
|
|
||
See accompanying notes.
1
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
471,608
|
|
$
|
384,389
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
255,057
|
|
209,185
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
216,551
|
|
175,204
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
203,059
|
|
150,801
|
|
|||
|
Income from operations
|
13,492
|
|
24,403
|
|
|||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(725
|
)
|
(1,355
|
)
|
|||
|
Other income, net
|
240
|
|
82
|
|
|||
|
Income before income taxes
|
13,007
|
|
23,130
|
|
|||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
5,193
|
|
8,469
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
$
|
7,814
|
|
$
|
14,661
|
|
|
|
Net income available per common share
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|||||||
|
Basic
|
104,898
|
|
103,847
|
|
|||
|
Diluted
|
107,096
|
|
105,705
|
|
|||
See accompanying notes.
2
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
7,814
|
|
$
|
14,661
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|||||||
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(2,440
|
)
|
134
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax $68
|
96
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(2,344
|
)
|
134
|
|
|||
|
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
5,470
|
|
$
|
14,795
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
7,814
|
|
$
|
14,661
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities
|
|||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
11,842
|
|
10,591
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange rate (gains) losses
|
606
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
11,908
|
|
6,418
|
|
|||
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
56
|
|
390
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(5,668
|
)
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|||
|
Changes in reserves and allowances
|
3,617
|
|
(1,917
|
)
|
|||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(76,018
|
)
|
(60,391
|
)
|
|||
|
Inventories
|
(4,323
|
)
|
1,552
|
|
|||
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
9,559
|
|
4,538
|
|
|||
|
Accounts payable
|
(10,558
|
)
|
(6,052
|
)
|
|||
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(11,780
|
)
|
(26,041
|
)
|
|||
|
Income taxes payable and receivable
|
(11,591
|
)
|
(13,274
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(74,536
|
)
|
(73,048
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|||||||
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(18,329
|
)
|
(8,839
|
)
|
|||
|
Change in restricted cash
|
—
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(18,329
|
)
|
(9,037
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|||||||
|
Payments on long term debt
|
(1,443
|
)
|
(1,943
|
)
|
|||
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements
|
4,222
|
|
9,500
|
|
|||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other stock issuances
|
4,670
|
|
6,868
|
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
7,449
|
|
14,425
|
|
|||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(703
|
)
|
(672
|
)
|
|||
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(86,119
|
)
|
(68,332
|
)
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|||||||
|
Beginning of period
|
341,841
|
|
175,384
|
|
|||
|
End of period
|
$
|
255,722
|
|
$
|
107,052
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in accrual for property and equipment
|
$
|
(7,380
|
)
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Description of the Business
Under Armour, Inc. is a developer, marketer and distributor of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. These products are sold worldwide and worn by athletes at all levels, from youth to professional on playing fields around the globe, as well as by consumers with active lifestyles.
2
. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Under Armour, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements was condensed or omitted for the interim periods presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations were included. All intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated. The consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2012
is derived from the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended
December 31, 2012
(the “
2012
Form 10-K”), which should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements. The results for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2013
or any other portions thereof.
On June 11, 2012 the Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock, which was effected in the form of a
100%
common stock dividend distributed on July 9, 2012. Stockholders' equity and all references to share and per share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split for all periods presented.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from large sporting goods retailers. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition, and generally, collateral is not required. The most significant customers that accounted for a large portion of net revenues and accounts receivable were as follows:
|
Customer
A
|
Customer
B
|
Customer
C
|
||||||
|
Net revenues
|
||||||||
|
Three months ended March 31, 2013
|
17.6
|
%
|
5.8
|
%
|
5.4
|
%
|
||
|
Three months ended March 31, 2012
|
18.6
|
%
|
7.3
|
%
|
7.2
|
%
|
||
|
Accounts receivable
|
||||||||
|
As of March 31, 2013
|
27.4
|
%
|
8.5
|
%
|
7.5
|
%
|
||
|
As of December 31, 2012
|
26.4
|
%
|
8.8
|
%
|
7.0
|
%
|
||
|
As of March 31, 2012
|
28.5
|
%
|
12.4
|
%
|
7.3
|
%
|
||
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
As of
March 31, 2013
,
December 31, 2012
and
March 31, 2012
, the allowance for doubtful accounts was
$3.3 million
,
$3.3 million
and
$3.8 million
, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company charges certain customers shipping and handling fees. These fees are recorded in net revenues. The Company includes the majority of outbound handling costs as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Outbound handling costs include costs associated with preparing goods to ship to customers and certain costs to operate the Company’s distribution facilities. These costs, included within selling, general and administrative expenses, were
$9.0 million
5
and
$7.4 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively. The Company includes outbound freight costs associated with shipping goods to customers as a component of cost of goods sold.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, including estimates relating to assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update which requires companies to present either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update which allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine the likelihood of indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment and whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test currently required. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
3
. Credit Facility and Long Term Debt
Credit Facility
The Company has a credit facility with certain lending institutions. The credit facility has a term of
four
years through
March 2015
and provides for a committed revolving credit line of up to
$300.0 million
. The commitment amount under the revolving credit facility may be increased by an additional
$50.0 million
, subject to certain conditions and approvals as set forth in the credit agreement. No balances were outstanding under the revolving credit facility during the
three months ended March 31, 2013
or
2012
.
The credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries (other than trademarks and the land, buildings and other assets comprising the Company’s corporate headquarters) and by a pledge of
65%
of the equity interests of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. Up to
$5.0 million
of the facility may be used to support letters of credit, of which none were outstanding as of
March 31, 2013
and
2012
. The Company is required to maintain a certain leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement. As of
March 31, 2013
, the Company was in compliance with these ratios. The credit agreement also provides the lenders with the ability to reduce the borrowing base, even if the Company is in compliance with all conditions of the credit agreement, upon a material adverse change to the business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions that limit the Company’s ability, among other things, and subject to certain limited exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, pledge its assets as security, guaranty obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, or materially change its line of business. In addition, the credit agreement includes a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, as defined in the credit agreement, will be considered an event of default under the credit agreement.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest based on the daily balance outstanding at LIBOR (with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from
1.25%
to
1.75%
) or, in certain cases a base rate (based on a certain lending institution’s Prime Rate or as otherwise specified in the credit agreement, with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from
0.25%
to
0.75%
). The credit facility also carries a commitment fee equal to the unused borrowings multiplied by an applicable margin (varying from
0.25%
to
0.35%
). The applicable margins are calculated quarterly and vary based on the Company’s leverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement.
The credit facility included a
$25.0 million
term loan facility. In May 2011, the Company borrowed
$25.0 million
under the term loan facility to finance a portion of the acquisition of the Company's headquarters and repaid it in December 2012. The interest rate on the term loan was
1.7%
during the
three months ended March 31, 2012
.
6
Long Term Debt
The Company has long term debt agreements with various lenders to finance the acquisition or lease of qualifying capital investments. Loans under these agreements are collateralized by a first lien on the related assets acquired. As these agreements are not committed facilities, each advance is subject to approval by the lenders. Additionally, these agreements include a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, including the Company’s credit facility, will be considered an event of default under these agreements. These agreements require a prepayment fee if the Company pays outstanding amounts ahead of the scheduled terms. The terms of the credit facility limit the total amount of additional financing under these agreements to
$40.0 million
, of which
$18.0 million
was available for additional financing as of
March 31, 2013
. As of
March 31, 2013
,
December 31, 2012
and
March 31, 2012
, the outstanding principal balance under these agreements was
$10.9 million
,
$11.9 million
and
$12.8 million
, respectively. Currently, advances under these agreements bear interest rates which are fixed at the time of each advance. The weighted average interest rates on outstanding borrowings were
2.3%
and
3.9%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
In July 2011, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of its corporate headquarters, the Company assumed a
$38.6 million
nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property. The assumed loan had an original term of approximately
10
years with a scheduled maturity date of
March 2013
. The loan had an interest rate of
6.73%
. As of
March 31, 2012
, the outstanding balance on the loan was
$38.0 million
. In addition, in connection with this loan, the Company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts. As of
March 31, 2012
, the restricted cash balance was $
5.2 million
. The Company had
no
restricted cash requirements as of
March 31, 2013
.
In December 2012, the Company repaid the remaining balance of the assumed loan of $
37.7 million
and entered into a
$50.0 million
loan collateralized by the land, buildings and tenant improvements comprising the Company's corporate headquarters. The new loan has a
7
year term and maturity date of December 2019. The loan bears interest at one month LIBOR plus a margin of
1.50%
, and allows for prepayment without penalty. As of
March 31, 2013
, the outstanding balance on the loan was
$49.5 million
. The weighted average interest rate on the loan was
1.7%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
.
Interest expense was
$0.7 million
and
$1.4 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively. Interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities discussed above, as well as interest incurred in connection with the Company's interest rate swap contract.
The Company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities, however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities.
4. Commitments and Contingencies
There were no significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in the
2012
Form 10-K other than those which occur in the normal course of business.
The Company is, from time to time, involved in routine legal, trade, and other regulatory matters incidental to its business. The Company believes that the ultimate resolution of any such current proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
5
. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The fair value accounting guidance outlines a valuation framework, creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures, and prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
Financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value are set forth in the table below:
7
|
March 31, 2013
|
March 31, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivative foreign currency forward contracts (see Note 7)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Interest rate swap contract (see Note 7)
|
—
|
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
TOLI policies held by the Rabbi Trust
|
—
|
|
4,375
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,227
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Deferred Compensation Plan obligations
|
—
|
|
(3,013
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3,696
|
)
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
Fair values of the financial assets and liabilities listed above are determined using inputs that use as their basis readily observable market data that are actively quoted and are validated through external sources, including third-party pricing services and brokers. The foreign currency forward contracts represent gains and losses on derivative contracts, which is the net difference between the U.S. dollar value to be received or paid at the contracts’ settlement date and the U.S. dollar value of the foreign currency to be sold or purchased at the current forward exchange rate. The interest rate swap contract represents gains and losses on the derivative contract, which is the net difference between the fixed interest to be paid and variable interest to be received over the term of the contract based on current market rates. The fair value of the trust owned life insurance (“TOLI”) policies held by the Rabbi Trust is based on the cash-surrender value of the life insurance policies, which are invested primarily in mutual funds and a separately managed fixed income fund. These investments are in the same funds and initially purchased in substantially the same amounts as the selected investments of participants in the Under Armour, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), which represent the underlying liabilities to participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan. Liabilities under the Deferred Compensation Plan are recorded at amounts due to participants, based on the fair value of participants’ selected investments.
The carrying value of the Company's long term debt approximated its fair value as of
March 31, 2013
and
2012
. The fair value of the Company's long term debt was estimated based upon quoted prices for similar instruments (Level 2 input).
6. Stock-Based Compensation
In February 2013,
0.6 million
performance-based restricted stock units were awarded to certain officers and key employees under the Company's Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan. The performance-based restricted stock units have vesting conditions tied to the achievement of certain combined annual operating income targets for 2013 and 2014. Upon the achievement of the combined operating income targets, one third of the restricted stock units will vest in
February 2015
, one third will vest in
February 2016
and the remaining one third will vest in
February 2017
. If certain lower levels of combined operating income for 2013 and 2014 are achieved, fewer or no restricted stock units will vest and the remaining restricted stock units will be forfeited. The Company deemed the achievement of certain operating income targets for 2013 and 2014 probable and recorded
$0.4 million
of stock-based compensation expense for these performance-based restricted stock units during the
three months ended March 31, 2013
. The Company will assess the probability of the achievement of the remaining operating income targets at the end of each reporting period. If it becomes probable that the performance targets related to these performance-based restricted stock units will be achieved, a cumulative adjustment will be recorded as if ratable stock-based compensation expense had been recorded since the grant date. Additional stock based compensation of up to
$0.7 million
would have been recorded during the
three months ended March 31, 2013
for these performance-based restricted stock units had the achievement of the remaining operating income targets been deemed probable.
During 2012, the Company granted performance-based restricted stock units with vesting conditions tied to the achievement of certain combined annual operating income targets for 2013 and 2014. As of March 31, 2013, the Company deemed the achievement of certain operating income targets for 2013 and 2014 probable and recorded a cumulative adjustment of
$4.4 million
for a portion of these awards during the
three months ended March 31, 2013
. Additional stock based compensation of up to
$6.6 million
would have been recorded from the grant date through
March 31, 2013
for these performance-based restricted stock units had the full achievement of these operating income targets been deemed probable.
During 2011, the Company granted performance-based restricted stock units with vesting conditions tied to the achievement of certain combined annual operating income targets for 2012 and 2013. As of March 31, 2012, the Company deemed the achievement of certain operating income targets for 2012 and 2013 probable and recorded a cumulative adjustment of
$2.4 million
during the
three months ended March 31, 2012
. As of March 31, 2013, the Company deemed the achievement of certain operating income targets for 2012 and 2013 probable and recorded a cumulative adjustment of
$4.6 million
for a portion of these awards during the
three months ended March 31, 2013
. Additional stock based compensation of up to
$4.6 million
would have been recorded from the grant date through
March 31, 2013
for these performance-based restricted stock units had the full achievement of these operating income targets been deemed probable.
8
7. Risk Management and Derivatives
Foreign Currency Risk Management
The Company is exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relating to transactions generated by its international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies. These gains and losses are primarily driven by intercompany transactions. From time to time, the Company may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for its various international subsidiaries.
As of
March 31, 2013
, the aggregate notional value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was
$32.9 million
, which primarily was comprised of Canadian Dollar/U.S. Dollar, Euro/U.S. Dollar, and Pound Sterling/Euro currency pairs with contract maturities of
1 month
. The fair values of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of
$16.3 thousand
and
$0.1 million
as of
March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively, and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts were assets of
$4.8 thousand
as of
December 31, 2012
, and were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Refer to Note
5
for a discussion of the fair value measurements. Included in other income, net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses)
|
$
|
(606
|
)
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
Realized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses)
|
(594
|
)
|
782
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized derivative gains (losses)
|
(21
|
)
|
554
|
|
|||
|
Realized derivative gains (losses)
|
1,461
|
|
(2,940
|
)
|
|||
Interest Rate Risk Management
In order to maintain liquidity and fund business operations, the Company enters into long term debt arrangements with various lenders which bear a range of fixed and variable rates of interest. The nature and amount of the Company's long-term debt can be expected to vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. The Company may elect to enter into interest rate swap contracts to reduce the impact associated with interest rate fluctuations. In December 2012, the Company began utilizing an interest rate swap contract to convert a portion of variable rate debt under the $
50.0 million
loan to fixed rate debt. The contract pays fixed and receives variable rates of interest based on one-month LIBOR and has a maturity date of December 2019. The interest rate swap contract is accounted for as a cash flow hedge and accordingly, the effective portion of the changes in fair value are recorded in other comprehensive income and reclassified into interest expense over the life of the underlying debt obligation.
Refer to Note
3
for a discussion of long term debt.
As of
March 31, 2013
, the notional value of the Company's outstanding interest rate swap contract was $
25.0 million
. During the
three months ended March 31, 2013
, the Company recorded a $
66.4 thousand
increase in interest expense, representing the effective portion of the contract, reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income. The fair value of the interest rate swap contract was an asset of
$22.6 thousand
as of
March 31, 2013
, and was included in other long term assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company enters into derivative contracts with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings and is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by these financial institutions. This credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in the foreign currency forward contracts. However, the Company monitors the credit quality of these financial institutions and considers the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.
8. Provision for Income Taxes
The effective rates for income taxes were
39.9%
and
36.6%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively. The effective tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
was higher than the effective tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2012
primarily due to state tax credits and favorable one-time discrete items included in the 2012 effective tax rate. The Company’s annual
2013
effective tax rate is expected to be approximately
39.0%
to
39.5%
.
9
9. Earnings per Share
The following represents a reconciliation from basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Numerator
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
7,814
|
|
$
|
14,661
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to participating securities
|
(8
|
)
|
(59
|
)
|
|||
|
Net income available to common shareholders (1)
|
$
|
7,806
|
|
$
|
14,602
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
104,751
|
|
103,414
|
|
|||
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
2,198
|
|
1,859
|
|
|||
|
Weighted average common shares and dilutive securities outstanding
|
106,949
|
|
105,273
|
|
|||
|
Earnings per share - basic
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
(1) Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
104,751
|
|
103,414
|
|
|||
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding and participating securities
|
104,898
|
|
103,847
|
|
|||
|
Percentage allocated to common stockholders
|
99.9
|
%
|
99.6
|
%
|
|||
Effects of potentially dilutive securities are presented only in periods in which they are dilutive. Stock options and restricted stock units representing
0.1 million
and
0.2 million
shares of common stock outstanding for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
10. Segment Data and Related Information
The Company’s operating segments are based on how the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) makes decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance. As such, the CODM receives discrete financial information by geographic region based on the Company’s strategy to become a global brand. These geographic regions include North America; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); and Asia. The Company’s operating segments are based on these geographic regions. Each geographic segment operates exclusively in one industry: the development, marketing and distribution of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. Due to the insignificance of the EMEA, Latin America and Asia operating segments, they have been combined into other foreign countries for disclosure purposes.
The geographic distribution of the Company’s net revenues and operating income are summarized in the following tables based on the location of its customers and operations. Net revenues represent sales to external customers for each segment. In addition to net revenues, operating income is a primary financial measure used by the Company to evaluate performance of each segment. Intercompany balances were eliminated for separate disclosure and corporate expenses from North America have not been allocated to other foreign countries.
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Net revenues
|
|||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
440,868
|
|
$
|
362,521
|
|
|
|
Other foreign countries
|
30,740
|
|
21,868
|
|
|||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
471,608
|
|
$
|
384,389
|
|
|
10
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Operating income
|
|||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
13,127
|
|
$
|
22,361
|
|
|
|
Other foreign countries
|
365
|
|
2,042
|
|
|||
|
Total operating income
|
13,492
|
|
24,403
|
|
|||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(725
|
)
|
(1,355
|
)
|
|||
|
Other expense, net
|
240
|
|
82
|
|
|||
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
13,007
|
|
$
|
23,130
|
|
|
Net revenues by product category are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Apparel
|
$
|
345,526
|
|
$
|
283,331
|
|
|
|
Footwear
|
80,783
|
|
63,663
|
|
|||
|
Accessories
|
36,082
|
|
29,635
|
|
|||
|
Total net sales
|
462,391
|
|
376,629
|
|
|||
|
License revenues
|
9,217
|
|
7,760
|
|
|||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
471,608
|
|
$
|
384,389
|
|
|
11
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein by reference (if any) constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts, such as statements regarding our future financial condition or results of operations, our prospects and strategies for future growth, the development and introduction of new products, and the implementation of our marketing and branding strategies. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “outlook,” “potential,” the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein by reference (if any) reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause events or our actual activities or results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future events, results, actions, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (our “
2012
Form 10-K”) or in this Form 10-Q under “Risk Factors”, if included herein, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”). These factors include without limitation:
|
•
|
changes in general economic or market conditions that could affect consumer spending and the financial health of our retail customers;
|
|
•
|
our ability to effectively manage our growth and a more complex, global business;
|
|
•
|
our ability to effectively develop and launch new, innovative and updated products;
|
|
•
|
our ability to accurately forecast consumer demand for our products and manage our inventory in response to changing demands;
|
|
•
|
increased competition causing us to reduce the prices of our products or to increase significantly our marketing efforts in order to avoid losing market share;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the costs of our products;
|
|
•
|
loss of key suppliers or manufacturers or failure of our suppliers or manufacturers to produce or deliver our products in a timely or cost-effective manner;
|
|
•
|
our ability to further expand our business globally and to drive brand awareness and consumer acceptance of our products in other countries;
|
|
•
|
our ability to accurately anticipate and respond to seasonal or quarterly fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
•
|
our ability to effectively market and maintain a positive brand image;
|
|
•
|
our ability to comply with trade and other regulations;
|
|
•
|
the availability, integration and effective operation of management information systems and other technology; and
|
|
•
|
our ability to attract and retain the services of our senior management and key employees.
|
The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q reflect our views and assumptions only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
We are a leading developer, marketer and distributor of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. The brand’s moisture-wicking fabrications are engineered in many different designs and styles for wear in nearly every climate to provide a performance alternative to traditional products. Our products are sold worldwide and worn by athletes at all levels, from youth to professional, on playing fields around the globe, as well as by consumers with active lifestyles.
We are a growth company as evidenced by the increase in net revenues to
$1,834.9 million
in
2012
from
$725.2 million
in
2008
. We reported net revenues of
$471.6 million
for the first
three
months of
2013
, which represented a
22.7%
increase from the first
three
months of
2012
. We believe that our growth in net revenues has been driven by a growing interest in performance products and the strength of the Under Armour brand in the marketplace. We plan to continue to increase our net
12
revenues over the long term by increased sales of our apparel, footwear and accessories, expansion of our wholesale distribution sales channel, growth in our direct to consumer sales channel and expansion in international markets. Our direct to consumer sales channel includes our factory house and specialty stores, website and catalog. New offerings for
2013
include UA HEATGEAR
®
Sonic apparel, UA Spine Venom running footwear and ARMOUR39
TM
fitness monitoring and tracking system.
Our operating segments are geographic and include North America; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); and Asia. Due to the insignificance of the EMEA, Latin America and Asia operating segments, they have been combined into other foreign countries for disclosure purposes.
Segment operating income consists of the revenues generated by that segment, less the cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative costs that are incurred directly by that segment, as well as an allocation of certain centrally managed costs, such as our distribution facility costs. Corporate costs, which are included in our North America operating segment, include costs related to company-wide administrative costs and debt service costs. These administrative costs include corporate office support, costs relating to accounting, human resources, legal, information technology, as well as costs related to overall corporate management.
General
Net revenues comprise both net sales and license revenues. Net sales comprise sales from our primary product categories, which are apparel, footwear and accessories. Our license revenues consist of fees paid to us by our licensees in exchange for the use of our trademarks on products such as socks, team uniforms, baby and kids’ apparel, eyewear and inflatable footballs and basketballs, as well as the distribution of our products in Japan.
Cost of goods sold consists primarily of product costs, inbound freight and duty costs, outbound freight costs, handling costs to make products floor-ready to customer specifications, royalty payments to endorsers based on a predetermined percentage of sales of selected products and write downs for inventory obsolescence. The fabrics in many of our products are made primarily of petroleum-based synthetic materials. Therefore our product costs, as well as our inbound and outbound freight costs, could be affected by long term pricing trends of oil. In general, as a percentage of net revenues, we expect cost of goods sold associated with our apparel and accessories to be lower than that of our footwear. No cost of goods sold is associated with license revenues.
We include outbound freight costs associated with shipping goods to customers as cost of goods sold; however, we include the majority of outbound handling costs as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. As a result, our gross profit may not be comparable to that of other companies that include outbound handling costs in their cost of goods sold. Outbound handling costs include costs associated with preparing goods to ship to customers and certain costs to operate our distribution facilities. These costs, included within selling, general and administrative expenses, were
$9.0 million
and
$7.4 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist of costs related to marketing, selling, product innovation and supply chain and corporate services. Personnel costs are included in these categories based on the employees’ function. Personnel costs include salaries, benefits, incentives and stock-based compensation related to the employee. Our marketing costs are an important driver of our growth. Marketing costs consist primarily of commercials, print ads, league, team, player and event sponsorships and depreciation expense specific to our in-store fixture program. In addition, marketing costs include costs associated with our Special Make-Up Shop located at one of our distribution facilities where we manufacture a limited number of products primarily for our league, team, player and event sponsorships. Selling costs consist primarily of costs relating to sales through our wholesale channel, commissions paid to third parties and the majority of our direct to consumer sales channel costs, including the cost of factory house and specialty store leases. Product innovation and supply chain costs include our apparel, footwear and accessories product innovation, sourcing and development costs, distribution facility operating costs, and costs relating to our Hong Kong and Guangzhou, China offices which help support product development, manufacturing, quality assurance and sourcing efforts. Corporate services primarily consist of corporate facility operating costs and company-wide administrative expenses.
Other income, net consists of unrealized and realized gains and losses on our foreign currency derivative financial instruments and unrealized and realized gains and losses on adjustments that arise from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relating to transactions generated by our international subsidiaries.
13
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Net revenues
|
$
|
471,608
|
|
$
|
384,389
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
255,057
|
|
209,185
|
|
|||
|
Gross profit
|
216,551
|
|
175,204
|
|
|||
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
203,059
|
|
150,801
|
|
|||
|
Income from operations
|
13,492
|
|
24,403
|
|
|||
|
Interest expense, net
|
(725
|
)
|
(1,355
|
)
|
|||
|
Other expense, net
|
240
|
|
82
|
|
|||
|
Income before income taxes
|
13,007
|
|
23,130
|
|
|||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
5,193
|
|
8,469
|
|
|||
|
Net income
|
$
|
7,814
|
|
$
|
14,661
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||
|
(As a percentage of net revenues)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||
|
Net revenues
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
54.1
|
%
|
54.4
|
%
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
45.9
|
%
|
45.6
|
%
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
43.1
|
%
|
39.2
|
%
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
2.9
|
%
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
0.1
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
2.8
|
%
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
1.1
|
%
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
Net income
|
1.7
|
%
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
Consolidated Results of Operations
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013
Compared to Three Months Ended
March 31, 2012
Net revenues
increased
$87.2 million
, or
22.7%
, to
$471.6 million
for the three months ended
March 31, 2013
from $
384.4 million
for the same period in
2012
. Net revenues by product category are summarized below:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
Apparel
|
$
|
345,526
|
|
$
|
283,331
|
|
$
|
62,195
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Footwear
|
80,783
|
|
63,663
|
|
17,120
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Accessories
|
36,082
|
|
29,635
|
|
6,447
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total net sales
|
462,391
|
|
376,629
|
|
85,762
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
License revenues
|
9,217
|
|
7,760
|
|
1,457
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
471,608
|
|
$
|
384,389
|
|
$
|
87,219
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|||
Net sales
increased $
85.8 million
, or
22.8%
, to $
462.4 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
376.6 million
during the same period in
2012
. The increase in net sales primarily reflects:
|
•
|
$29.3 million, or 30.9%, increase in direct to consumer sales, led by growth in our Ecommerce business, along with 20 additional stores globally, or a 22.2% increase, since
March 2012
; and
|
|
•
|
unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories, most significantly in our baselayer and training apparel, including new UA HEATGEAR
®
Sonic apparel and ArmourBra, running footwear, including UA Spine Venom, and headwear accessories.
|
14
License revenues
increased $1.4 million, or
18.8%
, to $
9.2 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
7.8 million
during the same period in
2012
. This increase in license revenues was a result of increased distribution and continued unit volume growth by our licensees.
Gross profit
increased $41.4 million to $
216.6 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
175.2 million
for the same period in
2012
. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues, or gross margin, increased
30
basis points to
45.9%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
compared to
45.6%
during the same period in
2012
. The increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following:
|
•
|
approximate 100 basis point increase driven primarily by lower North American apparel product input costs. We expect North American product input cost favorability will continue through the first half of 2013.
|
The above increase was partially offset by the below decreases:
|
•
|
approximate 35 basis point decrease driven by sales mix. The sales mix impact was primarily driven by increased sales of excess inventory through our factory house outlet stores at lower prices, along with increased lower margin sales to our distributors in Latin America. We expect the sales mix impact will become favorable as we move through the remainder of 2013.
|
|
•
|
approximate 35 basis point decrease driven by higher inbound freight, partially due to supply chain challenges, required to meet customer demand. We expect this year over year negative impact will continue through the first half of 2013.
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $
52.3 million
to $
203.1 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from
$150.8 million
for the same period in
2012
. As a percentage of net revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 43.1% for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
compared to 39.2% for the same period in
2012
. These changes were primarily attributable to the following:
|
•
|
Marketing costs increased $18.6 million to $62.8 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $44.2 million for the same period in
2012
primarily due to key marketing campaigns, including the I WILL
®
innovation campaign, as well as increased sponsorship of collegiate and professional teams and athletes, including Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. As a percentage of net revenues, marketing costs increased to 13.3% for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from 11.5% for the same period in
2012
primarily due to the items noted above.
|
|
•
|
Selling costs increased $12.8 million to $50.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $37.8 million for the same period in
2012
. This increase was primarily due to higher personnel and other costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel. As a percentage of net revenues, selling costs increased to 10.7% for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from 9.8% for the same period in
2012
primarily due to the items noted above.
|
|
•
|
Product innovation and supply chain costs increased $11.6 million to $49.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $37.7 million for the same period in
2012
primarily due to higher costs incurred for the design and sourcing of our expanding apparel, footwear and accessory lines along with higher incentive compensation costs. As a percentage of net revenues, product innovation and supply chain costs increased to 10.5% for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
compared to 9.8% for the same period in
2012
primarily due to increased incentive compensation costs.
|
|
•
|
Corporate services costs increased $9.3 million to $40.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $31.1 million for the same period in
2012
. This increase was primarily attributable to higher incentive compensation and administrative costs. As a percentage of net revenues, corporate services costs increased slightly to 8.6% for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
compared to 8.1% for the same period in
2012
.
|
Income from operations
decreased $
10.9 million
, or
44.7%
, to $
13.5 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
24.4 million
for the same period in
2012
. Income from operations as a percentage of net revenues decreased to
2.9%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from
6.3%
for the same period in
2012
. This decrease was primarily driven by the timing of marketing expenses and increased incentive compensation, partially offset by the higher gross profit percentage noted above.
Interest expense, net
decreased $0.7 million to $
0.7 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
1.4 million
for the same period in
2012
. This decrease was primarily due to higher interest in
2012
on debt assumed in connection with the acquisition of our corporate headquarters.
Other expense, net
increased $0.1 million to $
0.2 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
0.1 million
for the same period in
2012
. This increase was due to higher net gains on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in foreign currencies and our derivative financial instruments as compared to the prior period.
15
Provision for income taxes
decreased $
3.3 million
to $
5.2 million
during the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
8.5 million
during the same period in
2012
. For the
three months ended March 31, 2013
, our effective tax rate was
39.9%
compared to
36.6%
for the same period in
2012
. The effective rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
was higher than the effective rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2012
primarily due to state tax credits and favorable one-time discrete items included in the 2012 effective tax rate. Our 2013 annual effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 39.0 to 39.5%.
Segment Results of Operations
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013
Compared to Three Months Ended
March 31, 2012
Net revenues by geographic region
are summarized below:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
440,868
|
|
$
|
362,521
|
|
$
|
78,347
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Other foreign countries
|
30,740
|
|
21,868
|
|
$
|
8,872
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
|||||
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
471,608
|
|
$
|
384,389
|
|
$
|
87,219
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|||
Net revenues in our North America operating segment increased $78.4 million to $
440.9 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
362.5 million
for the same period in
2012
primarily due to the items discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations. Net revenues in other foreign countries increased $8.8 million to $
30.7 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
21.9 million
for the same period in
2012
primarily due to unit sales growth to distributors in our Latin American operating segment and growth in our EMEA operating segment.
Operating income by geographic region
is summarized below:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
|
North America
|
$
|
13,127
|
|
$
|
22,361
|
|
$
|
(9,234
|
)
|
(41.3
|
)%
|
|||
|
Other foreign countries
|
365
|
|
2,042
|
|
(1,677
|
)
|
(82.1
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total operating income
|
$
|
13,492
|
|
$
|
24,403
|
|
$
|
(10,911
|
)
|
(44.7
|
)%
|
|||
Operating income in our North America operating segment decreased $9.3 million to $
13.1 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
22.4 million
for the same period in
2012
primarily due to the items discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations. Operating income in other foreign countries decreased $1.6 million to $
0.4 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from $
2.0 million
for the same period in
2012
primarily due to the costs associated with our continued investment to support our international expansion in our EMEA and Asia operating segments.
Seasonality
Historically, we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year, driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season, including our higher priced cold weather products, along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales. The level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business.
Financial Position, Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our cash requirements have principally been for working capital and capital expenditures. We fund our working capital, primarily inventory, and capital investments from cash flows from operating activities, cash and cash equivalents on hand and borrowings available under our credit and long term debt facilities. Our working capital requirements generally reflect the seasonality and growth in our business as we recognize the majority of our net revenues in the back half of the year. Our capital investments have included expanding our in-store fixture and branded concept shop program, improvements and expansion of our distribution and corporate facilities to support our growth, leasehold improvements to our new factory house and specialty stores, and investment and improvements in information technology systems.
Our inventory strategy is focused on continuing to meet consumer demand while improving our inventory efficiency over the long term by putting systems and processes in place to improve our inventory management. These systems and processes are designed to improve our forecasting and supply planning capabilities. In addition to systems and processes, key areas of focus that we believe will enhance inventory performance are SKU rationalization, added discipline around the purchasing of product, production lead time reduction, and better planning and execution in selling of excess inventory through our factory house stores and other liquidation channels.
16
We believe our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash from operations and borrowings available to us under our credit and long term debt facilities will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. We may require additional capital to meet our longer term liquidity and future growth needs. Although we believe we have adequate sources of liquidity over the long term, a prolonged economic recession or a slow recovery could adversely affect our business and liquidity. In addition, instability in or tightening of the capital markets could adversely affect our ability to obtain additional capital to grow our business and will affect the cost and terms of such capital.
Cash Flows
The following table presents the major components of net cash flows provided by and used in operating, investing and financing activities for the periods presented:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|||||||
|
Operating activities
|
$
|
(74,536
|
)
|
$
|
(73,048
|
)
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
(18,329
|
)
|
(9,037
|
)
|
|||
|
Financing activities
|
7,449
|
|
14,425
|
|
|||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(703
|
)
|
(672
|
)
|
|||
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
(86,119
|
)
|
$
|
(68,332
|
)
|
|
Operating Activities
Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items. Adjustments to net income for non-cash items include depreciation and amortization, unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains and losses, losses on disposals of property and equipment, stock-based compensation, deferred income taxes and changes in reserves and allowances. In addition, operating cash flows include the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities, principally inventories, accounts receivable, income taxes payable and receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Cash used in operating activities increased
$1.5 million
to
$74.5 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from
$73.0 million
during the same period in
2012
. The increase in cash used in operating activities was due to an increase in net cash outflows from operating assets and liabilities of
$5.0 million
and decrease in net income of
$6.9 million
, partially offset by an increase in adjustments to net income for non-cash items of
$10.4 million
. The increase in cash outflows related to changes in operating assets and liabilities period over period was primarily driven by the following:
|
•
|
a larger increase in accounts receivable of
$15.6 million
in the current period as compared to the prior period primarily due to the 22.8% increase in net sales during the
first quarter
of
2013
, coupled with an increased mix of sales to customers with payment terms at the higher end of our standard terms, and
|
|
•
|
a larger increase in inventory investments of
$5.9 million
in the current period as compared to the prior period primarily to support key 2013 launches, partially offset by
|
|
•
|
a smaller increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of
$14.3 million
in the current period as compared to the prior period, primarily due to the timing of payments for our marketing investments.
|
Adjustments to net income for non-cash items increased in the
three months ended March 31, 2013
as compared to the same period in
2012
primarily due to increased stock-based compensation expense in the current period as compared to the prior period and an increase in reserves and allowances in the current period as compared to a decrease in the prior period.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities increased
$9.3 million
to
$18.3 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from
$9.0 million
for the same period in
2012
. This increase in cash used in investing activities primarily represents costs to improve and expand our distribution and corporate facilities, along with factory house and specialty store openings in the current year period as compared to the prior period. Capital expenditures for the full year
2013
are anticipated to be $80.0 million to $85.0 million.
17
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities decreased $7.0 million to
$7.4 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
from
$14.4 million
for the same period in
2012
. This decrease is primarily due to lower excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements and proceeds from the exercise of stock options in the current period as compared to the prior period.
Credit Facility
We have a credit facility with certain lending institutions. The credit facility has a term of four years through March 2015 and provides for a committed revolving credit line of up to $300.0 million. The commitment amount under the revolving credit facility may be increased by an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions and approvals as set forth in the credit agreement. No balances were outstanding under the revolving credit facility during the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
.
The credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes and is collateralized by substantially all of our assets and certain of our domestic subsidiaries (other than trademarks and the land, buildings and other assets comprising our corporate headquarters) and by a pledge of 65% of the equity interests of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. Up to $5.0 million of the facility may be used to support letters of credit, of which none were outstanding as of
March 31, 2013
and
2012
. We are required to maintain a certain leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement. As of
March 31, 2013
, we were in compliance with these ratios. The credit agreement also provides the lenders with the ability to reduce the borrowing base, even if we are in compliance with all conditions of the credit agreement, upon a material adverse change to the business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions that limit our ability, among other things, and subject to certain limited exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, pledge our assets as security, guaranty obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, or materially change our line of business. In addition, the credit agreement includes a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, as defined in the credit agreement, will be considered an event of default under the credit agreement.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest based on the daily balance outstanding at LIBOR (with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 1.25% to 1.75%) or, in certain cases a base rate (based on a certain lending institution’s Prime Rate or as otherwise specified in the credit agreement, with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.75%). The credit facility also carries a commitment fee equal to the unused borrowings multiplied by an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.35%). The applicable margins are calculated quarterly and vary based on our leverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement.
The credit facility included a
$25.0 million
term loan facility. In May 2011, we borrowed
$25.0 million
under the term loan facility to finance a portion of the acquisition of our headquarters and repaid it in December 2012. The interest rate on the term loan was
1.7%
during the
three months ended March 31, 2012
.
Long Term Debt
We have long term debt agreements with various lenders to finance the acquisition or lease of qualifying capital investments. Loans under these agreements are collateralized by a first lien on the related assets acquired. As these agreements are not committed facilities, each advance is subject to approval by the lenders. Additionally, these agreements include a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, including our credit facility, will be considered an event of default under these agreements. These agreements require a prepayment fee if we pay outstanding amounts ahead of the scheduled terms. The terms of the credit facility limit the total amount of additional financing under these agreements to
$40.0 million
, of which
$18.0 million
was available for additional financing as of
March 31, 2013
. As of
March 31, 2013
,
December 31, 2012
and
March 31, 2012
, the outstanding principal balance under these agreements was
$10.9 million
,
$11.9 million
and
$12.8 million
, respectively. Currently, advances under these agreements bear interest rates which are fixed at the time of each advance. The weighted average interest rates on outstanding borrowings were
2.3%
and
3.9%
for the
three months ended March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
In July 2011, in connection with the acquisition of our corporate headquarters, we assumed a
$38.6 million
nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property. The assumed loan had an original term of approximately
10
years with a scheduled maturity date of
March 2013
. The loan had an interest rate of
6.73%
. As of
March 31, 2012
, the outstanding balance on the loan was
$38.0 million
. In addition, in connection with this loan, we were required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts. As of
March 31, 2012
, the restricted cash balance was $
5.2 million
. The Company had no restricted cash requirements as of
March 31, 2013
.
18
In December 2012, we repaid the remaining balance of the assumed loan of $
37.7 million
and entered into a
$50.0 million
loan collateralized by the land, buildings and tenant improvements comprising our corporate headquarters. The new loan has a
7
year term and maturity date of December 2019. The loan bears interest at one month LIBOR plus a margin of
1.50%
, and allows for prepayment without penalty. As of
March 31, 2013
, the outstanding balance on the loan was
$49.5 million
.
We monitor the financial health and stability of our lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities, however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities.
Contractual Commitments and Contingencies
There were no significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in our
2012
Form 10-K other than those which occur in the normal course of business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. To prepare these financial statements, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could be significantly different from these estimates. We believe the following addresses the critical accounting policies that are necessary to understand and evaluate our reported financial results.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements included in our
2012
Form 10-K. The SEC suggests companies provide additional disclosure on those accounting policies considered most critical. The SEC considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to our financial condition and results of operations and requires significant judgments and estimates on the part of management in its application. Our estimates are often based on complex judgments, probabilities and assumptions that management believes to be reasonable, but that are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. It is also possible that other professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a range of alternative estimated amounts. For a complete discussion of our critical accounting policies, see the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of the MD&A in our
2012
Form 10-K. There were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2013
.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update which requires companies to present either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update which allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine the likelihood of indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment and whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test currently required. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Foreign Currency Risk
We currently generate a majority of our consolidated net revenues in the U.S., and the reporting currency for our consolidated financial statements is the U.S. dollar. As our net revenues generated outside of the United States increase, our results of operations could be adversely impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. For example, if we recognize foreign revenues in local foreign currencies (as we currently do in Canada and Europe) and if the U.S. dollar strengthens, it could have a negative impact on our foreign revenues upon translation of those results into the U.S. dollar upon consolidation of our financial statements. In addition, we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our foreign subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies. These gains and losses are primarily driven by intercompany transactions. These exposures are included in other income, net on the consolidated statements of income.
19
From time to time, we may elect to use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for our international subsidiaries. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
As of
March 31, 2013
, the aggregate notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was
$32.9 million
, which primarily was comprised of Canadian Dollar/U.S. Dollar, Euro/U.S. Dollar, and Pound Sterling/Euro currency pairs with contract maturities of 1 month. The foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of
March 31, 2013
have weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rates of
1.01 CAD
per $1.00,
€0.78
per $1.00 and
£0.84
per €1.00. The foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges, and accordingly, changes in their fair value are recorded in earnings. The fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of
$16.3 thousand
and
$0.1 million
as of
March 31, 2013
and
2012
, respectively, and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts were assets of $4.8 thousand as of
December 31, 2012
, and were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Refer to Note
5
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the fair value measurements. Included in other income, net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, |
||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses)
|
$
|
(606
|
)
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
Realized foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses)
|
(594
|
)
|
782
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized derivative gains (losses)
|
(21
|
)
|
554
|
|
|||
|
Realized derivative gains (losses)
|
1,461
|
|
(2,940
|
)
|
|||
Although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows, we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Interest Rate Risk
In order to maintain liquidity and fund business operations, we enter into long term debt arrangements with various lenders which bear a range of fixed and variable rates of interest. The nature and amount of our long-term debt can be expected to vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. We may elect to enter into interest rate swap contracts to reduce the impact associated with interest rate fluctuations. In December 2012, we began utilizing an interest rate swap contract to convert a portion of variable rate debt under the $50.0 million loan to fixed rate debt. The contract pays fixed and receives variable rates of interest based on one-month LIBOR and has a maturity date of December 2019. The interest rate swap contract is accounted for as a cash flow hedge and accordingly, the effective portion of the changes in fair value are recorded in other comprehensive income and reclassified into interest expense over the life of the underlying debt obligation.
As of
March 31, 2013
, the notional value of our outstanding interest rate swap contract was $
25.0 million
. During the
three months ended March 31, 2013
, we recorded a $
66.4 thousand
increase in interest expense, representing the effective portion of the contract, reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income. The fair value of the interest rate swap contract was an asset of
$22.6 thousand
as of
March 31, 2013
, and was included in other long term assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risk primarily on our accounts receivable. We provide credit to customers in the ordinary course of business and perform ongoing credit evaluations. We believe that our exposure to concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables is largely mitigated by our customer base. We believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover customer credit risks as of
March 31, 2013
.
Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs.
20
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
21
The Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2012
have not materially changed.
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
|
10.01
|
Under Armour, Inc. 2013 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan
|
|
31.01
|
Section 302 Chief Executive Officer Certification.
|
|
31.02
|
Section 302 Chief Financial Officer Certification.
|
|
32.01
|
Section 906 Chief Executive Officer Certification.
|
|
32.02
|
Section 906 Chief Financial Officer Certification.
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
UNDER ARMOUR, INC.
|
||
|
|
By:
|
/s/ B
RAD
D
ICKERSON
|
|
Brad Dickerson
|
||
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Date:
April 30, 2013
23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I. Financial InformationItem 1. Financial StatementsItem 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market RiskItem 4. Controls and ProceduresPart II. Other InformationItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 6. Exhibits