USB 10-Q Quarterly Report Sept. 30, 2014 | Alphaminr

USB 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2014

US BANCORP \DE\
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-Q 1 d772448d10q.htm 10-Q 10-Q
Table of Contents

LOGO


Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

þ

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from (not applicable)

Commission file number 1-6880

U.S. BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 41-0255900

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

800 Nicollet Mall

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

651-466-3000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(not applicable)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES þ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES þ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES ¨ NO þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class Outstanding as of October 31, 2014
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value 1,789,386,385 shares


Table of Contents

Table of Contents and Form 10-Q Cross Reference Index

Part I — Financial Information

1) Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 2)

3

a) Overview

3

b) Statement of Income Analysis

4

c) Balance Sheet Analysis

6

d) Non-GAAP Financial Measures

33

e) Critical Accounting Policies

35

f) Controls and Procedures (Item 4)

35

2) Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk/Corporate Risk Profile (Item 3)

8

a) Overview

8

b) Credit Risk Management

9

c) Residual Value Risk Management

23

d) Operational Risk Management

23

e) Compliance Risk Management

23

f) Interest Rate Risk Management

23

g) Market Risk Management

24

h) Liquidity Risk Management

25

i) Capital Management

27

3) Line of Business Financial Review

28

4) Financial Statements (Item 1)

36

Part II — Other Information

1) Legal Proceedings (Item 1)

83

2) Risk Factors (Item 1A)

83

3) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (Item 2)

83

4) Exhibits (Item 6)

83

5) Signature

84

6) Exhibits

85

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about U.S. Bancorp. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements and are based on the information available to, and assumptions and estimates made by, management as of the date hereof. These forward-looking statements cover, among other things, anticipated future revenue and expenses and the future plans and prospects of U.S. Bancorp. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. A reversal or slowing of the current moderate economic recovery or another severe contraction could adversely affect U.S. Bancorp’s revenues and the values of its assets and liabilities. Global financial markets could experience a recurrence of significant turbulence, which could reduce the availability of funding to certain financial institutions and lead to a tightening of credit, a reduction of business activity, and increased market volatility. Continued stress in the commercial real estate markets, as well as a delay or failure of recovery in the residential real estate markets could cause additional credit losses and deterioration in asset values. In addition, U.S. Bancorp’s business and financial performance is likely to be negatively impacted by recently enacted and future legislation and regulation. U.S. Bancorp’s results could also be adversely affected by deterioration in general business and economic conditions; changes in interest rates; deterioration in the credit quality of its loan portfolios or in the value of the collateral securing those loans; deterioration in the value of securities held in its investment securities portfolio; legal and regulatory developments; increased competition from both banks and non-banks; changes in customer behavior and preferences; breaches in data security; effects of mergers and acquisitions and related integration; effects of critical accounting policies and judgments; and management’s ability to effectively manage credit risk, residual value risk, market risk, operational risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and reputational risk.

For discussion of these and other risks that may cause actual results to differ from expectations, refer to U.S. Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Corporate Risk Profile” contained in Exhibit 13, and all subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, factors other than these also could adversely affect U.S. Bancorp’s results, and the reader should not consider these factors to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof, and U.S. Bancorp undertakes no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events.

U.S. Bancorp 1


Table of Contents
Table 1 Selected Financial Data

Three Months Ended

September 30,

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data) 2014 2013 Percent
Change
2014 2013 Percent
Change

Condensed Income Statement

Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)

$ 2,748 $ 2,714 1.3 % $ 8,198 $ 8,095 1.3 %

Noninterest income

2,245 2,180 3.0 6,792 6,610 2.8

Securities gains (losses), net

(3 ) (3 ) 2 8 (75.0 )

Total net revenue

4,990 4,891 2.0 14,992 14,713 1.9

Noninterest expense

2,614 2,565 1.9 7,911 7,592 4.2

Provision for credit losses

311 298 4.4 941 1,063 (11.5 )

Income before taxes

2,065 2,028 1.8 6,140 6,058 1.4

Taxable-equivalent adjustment

56 56 167 168 (.6 )

Applicable income taxes

523 542 (3.5 ) 1,566 1,629 (3.9 )

Net income

1,486 1,430 3.9 4,407 4,261 3.4

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

(15 ) 38 * (44 ) 119 *

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 1,471 $ 1,468 .2 $ 4,363 $ 4,380 (.4 )

Net income applicable to U.S. Bancorp common shareholders

$ 1,405 $ 1,400 .4 $ 4,163 $ 4,163

Per Common Share

Earnings per share

$ .78 $ .76 2.6 % $ 2.30 $ 2.26 1.8 %

Diluted earnings per share

.78 .76 2.6 2.29 2.25 1.8

Dividends declared per share

.245 .230 6.5 .720 .655 9.9

Book value per share

21.38 19.31 10.7

Market value per share

41.83 36.58 14.4

Average common shares outstanding

1,798 1,832 (1.9 ) 1,809 1,844 (1.9 )

Average diluted common shares outstanding

1,807 1,843 (2.0 ) 1,819 1,854 (1.9 )

Financial Ratios

Return on average assets

1.51 % 1.65 % 1.56 % 1.67 %

Return on average common equity

14.5 15.8 14.7 16.0

Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)

3.16 3.43 3.26 3.45

Efficiency ratio (b)

52.4 52.4 52.8 51.6

Net charge-offs as a percent of average loans outstanding

.55 .57 .57 .68

Average Balances

Loans

$ 243,867 $ 229,362 6.3 % $ 240,098 $ 225,682 6.4 %

Loans held for sale

3,552 4,965 (28.5 ) 2,811 6,659 (57.8 )

Investment securities (c)

93,141 74,988 24.2 87,687 74,303 18.0

Earning assets

346,422 315,060 10.0 336,287 313,663 7.2

Assets

385,823 352,161 9.6 375,047 351,048 6.8

Noninterest-bearing deposits

74,126 68,264 8.6 72,274 67,183 7.6

Deposits

271,008 252,368 7.4 263,662 248,284 6.2

Short-term borrowings

30,961 27,495 12.6 30,362 27,736 9.5

Long-term debt

26,658 19,226 38.7 24,864 21,968 13.2

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity

43,132 39,936 8.0 42,498 39,675 7.1

September 30,

2014

December 31,

2013

Period End Balances

Loans

$ 245,591 $ 235,235 4.4 %

Investment securities

96,905 79,855 21.4

Assets

391,284 364,021 7.5

Deposits

273,097 262,123 4.2

Long-term debt

30,768 20,049 53.5

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity

43,141 41,113 4.9

Asset Quality

Nonperforming assets

$ 1,923 $ 2,037 (5.6 )

Allowance for credit losses

4,414 4,537 (2.7 )

Allowance for credit losses as a percent of period-end loans

1.80 % 1.93 %

Capital Ratios

Common equity tier 1 capital (d)

9.7 % 9.4 %(e)

Tier 1 capital (d)

11.3 11.2

Total risk-based capital (d)

13.6 13.2

Leverage (d)

9.4 9.6

Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets for the Basel III transitional advanced approaches

12.4

Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented standardized approach (e)

9.0 8.8

Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented advanced approaches (e)

11.8

Tangible common equity to tangible assets (e)

7.6 7.7

Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets (e)

9.3 9.1

* Not meaningful.
(a) Presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent.
(b) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding net securities gains (losses).
(c) Excludes unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities and any premiums or discounts recorded related to the transfer of investment securities at fair value from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity.
(d) September 30, 2014, calculated under the Basel III transitional standardized approach; December 31, 2013, calculated under Basel I.
(e) See Non-GAAP Financial Measures beginning on page 33.

2 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

OVERVIEW

Earnings Summary U.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) reported net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp of $1.5 billion for the third quarter of 2014, or $.78 per diluted common share, compared with $1.5 billion, or $.76 per diluted common share, for the third quarter of 2013. Return on average assets and return on average common equity were 1.51 percent and 14.5 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2014, compared with 1.65 percent and 15.8 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2013.

Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis, for the third quarter of 2014 was $99 million (2.0 percent) higher than the third quarter of 2013, reflecting a 1.3 percent increase in net interest income and a 3.0 percent increase in noninterest income. The increase in net interest income from a year ago was the result of an increase in average earning assets and continued growth in lower cost core deposit funding, partially offset by a decrease in the net interest margin. The noninterest income increase was primarily due to higher revenue in most fee businesses, partially offset by lower mortgage banking revenue.

Noninterest expense in the third quarter of 2014 was $49 million (1.9 percent) higher than the third quarter of 2013, primarily due to higher compensation expense, reflecting the impact of merit increases, acquisitions and higher staffing for risk, compliance and internal audit activities.

The provision for credit losses for the third quarter of 2014 of $311 million was $13 million (4.4 percent) higher than the third quarter of 2013. Net charge-offs in the third quarter of 2014 were $336 million, compared with $328 million in the third quarter of 2013. Refer to “Corporate Risk Profile” for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp for the first nine months of 2014 was $4.4 billion, or $2.29 per diluted common share, compared with $4.4 billion, or $2.25 per diluted common share for the first nine months of 2013. Return on average assets and return on average common equity were 1.56 percent and 14.7 percent, respectively, for the first nine months of 2014, compared with 1.67 percent and 16.0 percent, respectively, for the first nine months of 2013. The results for the first nine months of 2014 included a second quarter $214 million gain related to the sale of Visa Inc. Class B common stock (“Visa sale”), offset by a $200 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice to resolve an investigation relating to the endorsement of mortgage loans under the Federal Housing Administration’s insurance program (“FHA DOJ settlement”). Together, these two items had no impact on diluted earnings per common share.

Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis, for the first nine months of 2014 was $279 million (1.9 percent) higher than the first nine months of 2013, primarily reflecting a 1.3 percent increase in net interest income and a 2.7 percent increase in noninterest income. The increase in net interest income from a year ago was the result of an increase in average earning assets and continued growth in lower cost core deposit funding, partially offset by a decrease in the net interest margin. The noninterest income increase was primarily due to higher revenue in most fee businesses and the Visa sale, partially offset by lower mortgage banking revenue.

Noninterest expense in the first nine months of 2014 was $319 million (4.2 percent) higher than the first nine months of 2013, primarily due to the FHA DOJ settlement and higher compensation expense.

The provision for credit losses for the first nine months of 2014 of $941 million was $122 million (11.5 percent) lower than the first nine months of 2013. Net charge-offs in the first nine months of 2014 were $1.0 billion, compared with $1.2 billion in the first nine months of 2013. Refer to “Corporate Risk Profile” for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

Acquisitions In June 2014, the Company acquired the Chicago-area branch banking operations of the Charter One Bank franchise (“Charter One”) owned by RBS Citizens Financial Group. The acquisition included Charter One’s retail branch network, small business operations and select middle market relationships. The Company acquired approximately $969 million of loans and $4.8 billion of deposits with this transaction.

U.S. Bancorp 3


Table of Contents

STATEMENT OF INCOME ANALYSIS

Net Interest Income Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $2.7 billion in the third quarter and $8.2 billion in the first nine months of 2014, or increases of $34 million (1.3 percent) and $103 million (1.3 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases were the result of growth in average earning assets and lower cost core deposit funding, partially offset by lower rates on new loans and investment securities and lower loan fees. Average earning assets were $31.4 billion (10.0 percent) higher in the third quarter and $22.6 billion (7.2 percent) higher in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, driven by increases in loans and investment securities, partially offset by decreases in loans held for sale. The net interest margin, on a taxable-equivalent basis, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 was 3.16 percent and 3.26 percent, respectively, compared with 3.43 percent and 3.45 percent in the third quarter and first nine months of 2013, respectively. The decreases from the same periods of the prior year primarily reflected lower reinvestment rates on investment securities, as well as growth in the investment portfolio at lower average rates, lower loan fees due to the wind down of the short-term, small dollar advance product, Checking Account Advance (“CAA”), and strong growth in lower rate commercial loans, partially offset by lower funding costs. Refer to the “Consolidated Daily Average Balance Sheet and Related Yields and Rates” tables for further information on net interest income.

Average total loans for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 were $14.5 billion (6.3 percent) and $14.4 billion (6.4 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2013, driven by growth in commercial loans, residential mortgages, commercial real estate loans, credit card loans and other retail loans. These increases were driven by higher demand for loans from new and existing customers. The increases were partially offset by a decline in loans covered by loss sharing agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Average loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (“covered” loans) decreased $2.5 billion (25.6 percent) in the third quarter and $2.6 billion (24.9 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, respectively.

Average investment securities in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 were $18.2 billion (24.2 percent) and $13.4 billion (18.0 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2013, primarily due to purchases of U.S. government agency-backed securities, net of prepayments and maturities, in preparation for final liquidity coverage ratio regulatory requirements.

Average total deposits for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 were $18.6 billion (7.4 percent) and $15.4 billion (6.2 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2013. Average noninterest-bearing deposits for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 were $5.9 billion (8.6 percent) and $5.1 billion (7.6 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of the prior year, reflecting growth in Consumer and Small Business Banking, Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate, and corporate trust balances, as well as the impact of the Charter One acquisition. Average total savings deposits for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 were $19.0 billion (14.0 percent) and $14.2 billion (10.5 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2013, reflecting growth in Consumer and Small Business Banking, Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate and corporate trust balances, as well as the impact of the Charter One acquisition. Average time deposits less than $100,000 for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 were $1.5 billion (11.6 percent) and $1.9 billion (14.8 percent) lower, respectively, than the same periods of 2013, due to maturities. Average time deposits greater than $100,000 for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 were $4.8 billion (13.6 percent) and $2.0 billion (6.0 percent) lower, respectively, than the same periods of the prior year, primarily due to declines in Consumer and Small Business Banking and broker-dealer balances. Time deposits greater than $100,000 are managed as an alternative to other funding sources, such as wholesale borrowing, based largely on relative pricing and liquidity characteristics.

4 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Table 2 Noninterest Income

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 Percent
Change
2014 2013 Percent
Change

Credit and debit card revenue

$ 251 $ 244 2.9 % $ 749 $ 702 6.7 %

Corporate payment products revenue

195 192 1.6 550 540 1.9

Merchant processing services

387 371 4.3 1,127 1,091 3.3

ATM processing services

81 83 (2.4 ) 241 248 (2.8 )

Trust and investment management fees

315 280 12.5 930 842 10.5

Deposit service charges

185 180 2.8 513 493 4.1

Treasury management fees

136 134 1.5 409 408 .2

Commercial products revenue

209 207 1.0 635 616 3.1

Mortgage banking revenue

260 328 (20.7 ) 774 1,125 (31.2 )

Investment products fees

49 46 6.5 142 133 6.8

Securities gains (losses), net

(3 ) (3 ) 2 8 (75.0 )

Other

177 115 53.9 722 412 75.2

Total noninterest income

$ 2,242 $ 2,177 3.0 % $ 6,794 $ 6,618 2.7 %

Provision for Credit Losses The provision for credit losses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 increased $13 million (4.4 percent) and decreased $122 million (11.5 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. Net charge-offs increased $8 million (2.4 percent) and decreased $127 million (11.0 percent) in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively, compared with the same periods of the prior year, reflecting higher commercial loan charge-offs and lower recoveries in commercial real estate in the current year, offset by improvements in residential mortgages and home equity and second mortgages. The provision for credit losses was lower than net charge-offs by $25 million in the third quarter and $85 million in the first nine months of 2014, compared with $30 million in the third quarter and $90 million in the first nine months of 2013. Refer to “Corporate Risk Profile” for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

Noninterest Income Noninterest income was $2.2 billion in the third quarter and $6.8 billion in the first nine months of 2014, reflecting increases of $65 million (3.0 percent) and $176 million (2.7 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases over a year ago were principally due to increases in a majority of fee revenue categories, partially offset by reductions in mortgage banking revenue. Trust and investment management fees increased, reflecting account growth, improved market conditions and business expansion. Merchant processing services revenue was higher as a result of increases in fee-based product revenue and higher volumes, partially offset by lower rates. Credit and debit card revenue and corporate payment products revenue increased primarily due to higher transaction volumes. Deposit service charges were higher due to account growth, the Charter One acquisition and pricing changes. Other income increased, reflecting higher equity investment income and retail leasing revenue. Other income further increased in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same period of the prior year, due to the second quarter 2014 Visa sale. In addition, commercial products revenue for the first nine months of 2014 increased compared with the same period of the prior year, principally due to higher syndication fees on tax-advantaged projects and higher bond underwriting fees, partially offset by lower standby letters of credit fees. The decrease in mortgage banking revenue in the third quarter of 2014, compared with the third quarter of 2013, was principally due to an unfavorable change in the valuation of mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), net of hedging activities. The decrease in mortgage banking revenue in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same period of the prior year, was primarily due to lower origination and sales revenue.

Noninterest Expense Noninterest expense was $2.6 billion in the third quarter and $7.9 billion in the first nine months of 2014, reflecting increases of $49 million (1.9 percent) and $319 million (4.2 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases over a year ago were the result of higher compensation expense, reflecting the impact of merit increases, acquisitions and higher staffing for risk, compliance and internal audit activities (partially offset by lower employee benefits expense driven by lower pension costs), higher net occupancy and equipment expense due to business initiatives and higher maintenance costs, higher professional services expense due mainly to mortgage servicing-related project costs, and higher other expense reflecting the Charter One merger integration and mortgage servicing-related expenses, partially offset by lower tax-advantaged project costs in the current year as a result of the first quarter of 2014 adoption of new

U.S. Bancorp 5


Table of Contents
Table 3 Noninterest Expense

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 Percent
Change
2014 2013 Percent
Change

Compensation

$ 1,132 $ 1,088 4.0 % $ 3,372 $ 3,268 3.2 %

Employee benefits

250 278 (10.1 ) 796 865 (8.0 )

Net occupancy and equipment

249 240 3.8 739 709 4.2

Professional services

102 94 8.5 282 263 7.2

Marketing and business development

78 85 (8.2 ) 253 254 (.4 )

Technology and communications

219 214 2.3 644 639 .8

Postage, printing and supplies

81 76 6.6 242 230 5.2

Other intangibles

51 55 (7.3 ) 148 167 (11.4 )

Other

452 435 3.9 1,435 1,197 19.9

Total noninterest expense

$ 2,614 $ 2,565 1.9 % $ 7,911 $ 7,592 4.2 %

Efficiency ratio (a)

52.4 % 52.4 % 52.8 % 51.6 %

(a) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net.

accounting guidance for certain affordable housing tax credit investments. In addition, other expense further increased in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same period of 2013, due to the second quarter 2014 FHA DOJ settlement.

Income Tax Expense The provision for income taxes was $523 million (an effective rate of 26.0 percent) for the third quarter and $1.6 billion (an effective rate of 26.2 percent) for the first nine months of 2014, compared with $542 million (an effective rate of 27.5 percent) and $1.6 billion (an effective rate of 27.7 percent) for the same periods of 2013. For further information on income taxes, refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Loans The Company’s loan portfolio was $245.6 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $235.2 billion at December 31, 2013, an increase of $10.4 billion (4.4 percent). The increase was driven primarily by increases in commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, other retail loans and residential mortgages, including the Charter One acquisition, partially offset by lower credit card and covered loans.

Commercial loans and commercial real estate loans increased $8.8 billion (12.6 percent) and $1.0 billion (2.6 percent), respectively, at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013, reflecting higher demand from new and existing customers.

Other retail loans, which include retail leasing, home equity and second mortgages and other retail loans, increased $1.3 billion (2.6 percent) at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013. The increase was driven by higher auto and installment loans, home equity and second mortgages, and the Charter One acquisition, partially offset by lower student loan balances.

Residential mortgages held in the loan portfolio increased $801 million (1.6 percent) at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013. Residential mortgages originated and placed in the Company’s loan portfolio are primarily well-secured jumbo mortgages and branch-originated first lien home equity loans to borrowers with high credit quality. The Company generally retains portfolio loans through maturity; however, the Company’s intent may change over time based upon various factors such as ongoing asset/liability management activities, assessment of product profitability, credit risk, liquidity needs, and capital implications. If the Company’s intent or ability to hold an existing portfolio loan changes, the loan is transferred to loans held for sale.

Credit card loans decreased $163 million (.9 percent) at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013, primarily the result of customers paying down balances.

Loans Held for Sale Loans held for sale, consisting primarily of residential mortgages to be sold in the secondary market, were $3.9 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $3.3 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase in loans held for sale was principally due to the higher level of mortgage loan closings.

Almost all of the residential mortgage loans the Company originates or purchases for sale follow guidelines that allow the loans to be sold into existing, highly liquid secondary markets; in particular in government agency transactions and to government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”).

Investment Securities Investment securities totaled $96.9 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $79.9 billion at December 31, 2013. The $17.0 billion (21.4 percent) increase reflected $16.6 billion of net investment purchases, primarily U.S. government agency-backed securities in preparation for final liquidity coverage ratio regulatory requirements, and a

6 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Table 4 Investment Securities

Available-for-Sale Held-to-Maturity

At September 30, 2014

(Dollars in Millions)

Amortized
Cost

Fair

Value

Weighted-
Average
Maturity in
Years
Weighted-
Average
Yield (e)
Amortized
Cost

Fair

Value

Weighted-
Average
Maturity in
Years
Weighted-
Average
Yield (e)

U.S. Treasury and Agencies

Maturing in one year or less

$ 27 $ 27 .3 4.17 % $ 80 $ 81 .7 1.36 %

Maturing after one year through five years

1,385 1,387 3.7 1.39 1,096 1,096 3.9 1.42

Maturing after five years through ten years

1,179 1,163 8.1 2.83 1,445 1,412 7.8 2.20

Maturing after ten years

101 101 18.5 1.38 58 58 10.8 1.73

Total

$ 2,692 $ 2,678 6.1 2.05 % $ 2,679 $ 2,647 6.1 1.85 %

Mortgage-Backed Securities(a)

Maturing in one year or less

$ 565 $ 573 .7 1.81 % $ 120 $ 120 .8 1.16 %

Maturing after one year through five years

24,490 24,625 3.8 2.02 28,283 28,200 3.6 2.12

Maturing after five years through ten years

16,133 16,121 5.7 1.62 12,674 12,640 5.6 1.55

Maturing after ten years

1,355 1,350 12.5 1.21 343 346 12.7 1.17

Total

$ 42,543 $ 42,669 4.8 1.84 % $ 41,420 $ 41,306 4.3 1.94 %

Asset-Backed Securities(a)

Maturing in one year or less

$ $ % $ 1 $ 1 .7 .78 %

Maturing after one year through five years

271 281 3.5 2.32 6 9 2.9 .89

Maturing after five years through ten years

357 364 7.0 2.15 7 8 6.3 .81

Maturing after ten years

7 15.5 .88

Total

$ 628 $ 645 5.5 2.23 % $ 14 $ 25 4.8 .84 %

Obligations of State and Political Subdivisions(b)(c)

Maturing in one year or less

$ 724 $ 742 .6 6.66 % $ $ .4 11.64 %

Maturing after one year through five years

4,121 4,334 2.3 6.79 2 2 2.2 8.31

Maturing after five years through ten years

448 453 6.9 4.76 1 1 7.4 8.14

Maturing after ten years

34 34 18.0 5.06 7 7 11.4 2.51

Total

$ 5,327 $ 5,563 2.5 6.59 % $ 10 $ 10 9.0 4.54 %

Other Debt Securities

Maturing in one year or less

$ 6 $ 6 .4 1.01 % $ 2 $ 2 1.78 %

Maturing after one year through five years

82 82 1.2 1.13

Maturing after five years through ten years

24 22 6.1 .97

Maturing after ten years

690 639 18.7 2.47

Total

$ 696 $ 645 18.6 2.45 % $ 108 $ 106 2.2 1.11 %

Other Investments

$ 428 $ 474 14.4 2.30 % $ $ %

Total investment securities (d)

$ 52,314 $ 52,674 4.9 2.35 % $ 44,231 $ 44,094 4.4 1.93 %

(a) Information related to asset and mortgage-backed securities included above is presented based upon weighted-average maturities anticipating future prepayments.
(b) Information related to obligations of state and political subdivisions is presented based upon yield to first optional call date if the security is purchased at a premium, yield to maturity if purchased at par or a discount.
(c) Maturity calculations for obligations of state and political subdivisions are based on the first optional call date for securities with a fair value above par and contractual maturity for securities with a fair value equal to or below par.
(d) The weighted-average maturity of the available-for-sale investment securities was 6.0 years at December 31, 2013, with a corresponding weighted-average yield of 2.64 percent. The weighted-average maturity of the held-to-maturity investment securities was 4.5 years at December 31, 2013, with a corresponding weighted-average yield of 2.00 percent.
(e) Average yields are presented on a fully-taxable equivalent basis under a tax rate of 35 percent. Yields on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities are computed based on amortized cost balances, excluding any premiums or discounts recorded related to the transfer of investment securities at fair value from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity. Average yield and maturity calculations exclude equity securities that have no stated yield or maturity.

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(Dollars in Millions) Amortized
Cost
Percent
of Total
Amortized
Cost
Percent
of Total

U.S. Treasury and agencies

$ 5,371 5.5 % $ 4,222 5.3 %

Mortgage-backed securities

83,963 87.0 68,236 85.3

Asset-backed securities

642 .7 652 .8

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

5,337 5.5 5,685 7.1

Other debt securities and investments

1,232 1.3 1,184 1.5

Total investment securities

$ 96,545 100.0 % $ 79,979 100.0 %

$485 million favorable change in net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investment securities.

The Company’s available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in other comprehensive income (loss) unless a security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. At September 30, 2014, the Company’s net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities were $360 million, compared with net unrealized losses of $125 million at December 31, 2013. The favorable change in net unrealized gains (losses) was primarily due to increases in the fair value of agency mortgage-backed and state and

U.S. Bancorp 7


Table of Contents

political securities as a result of decreases in interest rates and changes in credit spreads. Gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities totaled $513 million at September 30, 2014, compared with $775 million at December 31, 2013. At September 30, 2014, the Company had no plans to sell securities with unrealized losses, and believes it is more likely than not that it would not be required to sell such securities before recovery of their amortized cost.

In December 2013, U.S. banking regulators approved final rules that prohibit banks from holding certain types of investments, such as investments in hedge and private equity funds. The Company does not anticipate the implementation of these final rules will require any significant liquidation of securities held or impairment charges. Refer to Notes 4 and 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on investment securities.

Deposits Total deposits were $273.1 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $262.1 billion at December 31, 2013, the result of increases in total savings deposits, noninterest-bearing deposits and time deposits greater than $100,000, including the Charter One acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in time deposits less than $100,000. Money market deposit balances increased $6.1 billion (10.3 percent) at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013, primarily due to higher corporate trust, Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate, and Consumer and Small Business Banking balances, including the Charter One acquisition. Savings account balances increased $2.2 billion (6.7 percent), primarily due to continued strong participation in a savings product offered by Consumer and Small Business Banking. Interest checking balances increased $1.5 billion (2.8 percent) primarily due to higher Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate, and Consumer and Small Business Banking balances, including the Charter One acquisition, partially offset by lower corporate trust and broker-dealer balances. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $1.7 billion (2.2 percent) at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013, primarily due to higher Consumer and Small Business Banking balances, including the Charter One acquisition. Time deposits greater than $100,000 increased $369 million (1.3 percent) at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013. Time deposits greater than $100,000 are managed as an alternative to other funding sources such as wholesale borrowing, based largely on relative pricing and liquidity characteristics. Time deposits less than $100,000 decreased $876 million (7.4 percent) at September 30, 2014, compared with December 31, 2013, primarily due to maturities.

Borrowings The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings as part of its asset/liability management and funding strategies. Short-term borrowings, which include federal funds purchased, commercial paper, repurchase agreements, borrowings secured by high-grade assets and other short-term borrowings, were $30.0 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $27.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The $2.4 billion (8.8 percent) increase in short-term borrowings was primarily due to higher commercial paper and other short-term borrowings balances, partially offset by lower repurchase agreement balances. Long-term debt was $30.8 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $20.0 billion at December 31, 2013. The $10.8 billion (53.5 percent) increase was primarily due to the issuances of $7.6 billion of bank notes, $2.3 billion of medium-term notes and $1.0 billion of subordinated notes, and a $1.8 billion increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, partially offset by $1.0 billion of subordinated note and $1.0 billion of medium-term note maturities. These increases in borrowings were used to fund the Company’s loan growth and securities purchases. Refer to the “Liquidity Risk Management” section for discussion of liquidity management of the Company.

CORPORATE RISK PROFILE

Overview Managing risks is an essential part of successfully operating a financial services company. The Company’s Board of Directors has approved a risk management framework which establishes governance and risk management requirements for all risk-taking activities. This framework includes Company and business line risk appetite statements which set boundaries for the types and amount of risk that may be undertaken in pursuing business objectives and initiatives. The Board of Directors, through its Risk Management Committee, oversees performance relative to the risk management framework, risk appetite statements, and other policy requirements.

The Executive Risk Management Committee (“ERC”), which is comprised of senior management and chaired by the Chief Risk Officer, oversees execution against the risk management framework and risk appetite statements. The ERC focuses on current and emerging risks, including strategic and reputational risks, directing timely and comprehensive actions. Senior operating committees have also been established, each responsible for overseeing a specified category of risk.

The Company’s most prominent risk exposures are credit, residual value, interest rate, market, liquidity, operational, compliance, strategic, and reputational. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the

8 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

principal balance of a loan, investment or derivative contract when it is due. Residual value risk is the potential reduction in the end-of-term value of leased assets. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates, which can affect the re-pricing of assets and liabilities differently. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and security prices that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as trading and available-for-sale securities, mortgage loans held for sale, MSRs and derivatives that are accounted for on a fair value basis. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, investors, or borrowers. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, or systems, or from external events, including the risk of loss resulting from breaches in data security. Compliance risk is the risk that customers may suffer economic loss or other injury, and/or that the Company may suffer regulatory sanctions, material financial loss, or loss to reputation through failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, standards of good practice, and codes of conduct. Strategic risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from adverse business decisions or improper implementation of those decisions. Reputational risk is the potential that negative publicity or press regarding the Company’s business practices or products, whether true or not, will cause a decline in the customer base, costly litigation, or revenue reductions. In addition to the risks identified above, other risk factors exist that may impact the Company. Refer to “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for a detailed discussion of these factors.

The Company’s Board and management-level governance committees are supported by a “three lines of defense” model for establishing effective checks and balances. The first line of defense, the business lines, manages risks in conformity with established limits and policy requirements. In turn, business leaders and their risk officers establish programs to ensure conformity with these limits and policy requirements. The second line of defense, which includes the Chief Risk Officer’s organization as well as policy and oversight activities of corporate support functions, translates risk appetite and strategy into actionable risk limits and policies. The second line of defense monitors first line of defense conformity with limits and policies, and provides reporting and escalation of emerging risks and other concerns to senior management and the Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors. The third line of defense, internal audit, is responsible for providing the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and senior management with independent assessment and assurance regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s governance, risk management, and control processes.

Management provides various risk reports to the Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors. The Risk Management Committee discusses with management the Company’s risk management performance, and provides a summary of key risks to the entire Board of Directors, covering the status of existing matters, areas of potential future concern, and specific information on certain types of loss events. The discussion also covers quarterly reports by management assessing the Company’s performance relative to the risk appetite statements and the associated risk limits, including:

Qualitative considerations, such as the macroeconomic environment, regulatory and compliance changes, litigation developments, and technology and cybersecurity;

Capital ratios and projections, including regulatory measures and stressed scenarios;

Credit measures, including adversely rated and nonperforming loans, leveraged transactions, credit concentrations and lending limits;

Interest rate and market risk, including market value and net income simulation, and trading-related Value at Risk;

Liquidity risk, including funding projections under various stressed scenarios;

Operational, compliance and strategic risk, including losses stemming from events such as fraud, processing errors, control breaches, breaches in data security, or adverse business decisions, as well as reporting on technology performance, and various legal and regulatory compliance measures; and

Reputational risk considerations, impacts and responses.

Credit Risk Management The Company’s strategy for credit risk management includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria, and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all commercial and consumer credit exposures. In evaluating its credit risk, the Company considers changes, if any, in underwriting activities, the loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry or customer-specific concentrations), trends in loan performance, the level of allowance coverage relative to similar banking institutions and macroeconomic factors, such as changes in unemployment rates, gross domestic product and consumer bankruptcy filings. The Risk Management Committee oversees the Company’s credit risk management process.

In addition, credit quality ratings, as defined by the Company, are an important part of the Company’s overall credit risk management and evaluation of its

U.S. Bancorp 9


Table of Contents

allowance for credit losses. Loans with a pass rating represent those loans not classified on the Company’s rating scale for problem credits, as minimal risk has been identified. Loans with a special mention or classified rating, including all of the Company’s loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing, nonaccrual loans, loans considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), and loans in a junior lien position that are current but are behind a modified or delinquent loan in a first lien position, encompass all loans held by the Company that it considers to have a potential or well-defined weakness that may put full collection of contractual cash flows at risk. The Company’s internal credit quality ratings for consumer loans are primarily based on delinquency and nonperforming status, except for a limited population of larger loans within those portfolios that are individually evaluated. For this limited population, the determination of the internal credit quality rating may also consider collateral value and customer cash flows. The Company obtains recent collateral value estimates for the majority of its residential mortgage and home equity and second mortgage portfolios, which allows the Company to compute estimated loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios reflecting current market conditions. These individual refreshed LTV ratios are considered in the determination of the appropriate allowance for credit losses. However, the underwriting criteria the Company employs consider the relevant income and credit characteristics of the borrower, such that the collateral is not the primary source of repayment. Refer to Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s loan portfolios including internal credit quality ratings. In addition, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Credit Risk Management” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for a more detailed discussion on credit risk management processes.

The Company manages its credit risk, in part, through diversification of its loan portfolio and limit setting by product type criteria and concentrations. As part of its normal business activities, the Company offers a broad array of lending products. The Company categorizes its loan portfolio into three segments, which is the level at which it develops and documents a systematic methodology to determine the allowance for credit losses. The Company’s three loan portfolio segments are commercial lending, consumer lending and covered loans. The commercial lending segment includes loans and leases made to small business, middle market, large corporate, commercial real estate, financial institution, non-profit and public sector customers. Key risk characteristics relevant to commercial lending segment loans include the industry and geography of the borrower’s business, purpose of the loan, repayment source, borrower’s debt capacity and financial flexibility, loan covenants, and nature of pledged collateral, if any. These risk characteristics, among others, are considered in determining estimates about the likelihood of default by the borrowers and the severity of loss in the event of default. The Company considers these risk characteristics in assigning internal risk ratings to, or forecasting losses on, these loans which are the significant factors in determining the allowance for credit losses for loans in the commercial lending segment.

The consumer lending segment represents loans and leases made to consumer customers including residential mortgages, credit card loans, and other retail loans such as revolving consumer lines, auto loans and leases, student loans, and home equity loans and lines. Home equity or second mortgage loans are junior lien closed-end accounts fully disbursed at origination. These loans typically are fixed rate loans, secured by residential real estate, with a 10- or 15-year fixed payment amortization schedule. Home equity lines are revolving accounts giving the borrower the ability to draw and repay balances repeatedly, up to a maximum commitment, and are secured by residential real estate. These include accounts in either a first or junior lien position. Typical terms on home equity lines in the portfolio are variable rates benchmarked to the prime rate, with a 15-year draw period during which a minimum payment is equivalent to the monthly interest, followed by a 10-year amortization period. A 10-year draw and 20-year amortization product was introduced during 2013 to provide customers the option to repay their outstanding balances over a longer period. At September 30, 2014, substantially all of the Company’s home equity lines were in the draw period. Key risk characteristics relevant to consumer lending segment loans primarily relate to the borrowers’ capacity and willingness to repay and include unemployment rates and other economic factors, customer payment history and in some cases, updated LTV information on real estate based loans. These risk characteristics, among others, are reflected in forecasts of delinquency levels, bankruptcies and losses which are the primary factors in determining the allowance for credit losses for the consumer lending segment.

The covered loan segment represents loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC that greatly reduce the risk of future credit losses to the Company. Key risk characteristics for covered segment loans are consistent with the segment they would otherwise be included in had the loss share coverage not been in place, but consider the indemnification provided by the FDIC.

10 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The Company further disaggregates its loan portfolio segments into various classes based on their underlying risk characteristics. The two classes within the commercial lending segment are commercial loans and commercial real estate loans. The three classes within the consumer lending segment are residential mortgages, credit card loans and other retail loans. The covered loan segment consists of only one class.

The Company’s consumer lending segment utilizes several distinct business processes and channels to originate consumer credit, including traditional branch lending, indirect lending, portfolio acquisitions, correspondent banks and loan brokers. Each distinct underwriting and origination activity manages unique credit risk characteristics and prices its loan production commensurate with the differing risk profiles.

Residential mortgages are originated through the Company’s branches, loan production offices and a wholesale network of originators. The Company may retain residential mortgage loans it originates on its balance sheet or sell the loans into the secondary market while retaining the servicing rights and customer relationships. Utilizing the secondary markets enables the Company to effectively reduce its credit and other asset/liability risks. For residential mortgages that are retained in the Company’s portfolio and for home equity and second mortgages, credit risk is also diversified by geography and managed by adherence to LTV and borrower credit criteria during the underwriting process.

The Company estimates updated LTV information quarterly, based on a method that combines automated valuation model updates and relevant home price indices. LTV is the ratio of the loan’s outstanding principal balance to the current estimate of property value. For home equity and second mortgages, combined loan-to-value (“CLTV”) is the combination of the first mortgage original principal balance and the second lien outstanding principal balance, relative to the current estimate of property value. Certain loans do not have a LTV or CLTV, primarily due to lack of availability of relevant automated valuation model and/or home price indices values, or lack of necessary valuation data on acquired loans.

The following tables provide summary information for the LTVs of residential mortgages and home equity and second mortgages by borrower type at September 30, 2014:

Residential mortgages

(Dollars in Millions)

Interest
Only
Amortizing Total Percent
of Total

Prime Borrowers

Less than or equal to 80%

$ 1,880 $ 37,335 $ 39,215 88.3 %

Over 80% through 90%

172 2,450 2,622 5.9

Over 90% through 100%

133 1,020 1,153 2.6

Over 100%

187 1,156 1,343 3.0

No LTV available

98 98 .2

Total

$ 2,372 $ 42,059 $ 44,431 100.0 %

Sub-Prime Borrowers

Less than or equal to 80%

$ $ 610 $ 610 48.1 %

Over 80% through 90%

202 202 15.9

Over 90% through 100%

173 173 13.6

Over 100%

284 284 22.4

No LTV available

Total

$ $ 1,269 $ 1,269 100.0 %

Other Borrowers

Less than or equal to 80%

$ 5 $ 459 $ 464 55.5 %

Over 80% through 90%

153 153 18.3

Over 90% through 100%

66 66 7.9

Over 100%

153 153 18.3

No LTV available

Total

$ 5 $ 831 $ 836 100.0 %

Loans Purchased From GNMA Mortgage Pools (a)

$ $ 5,421 $ 5,421 100.0 %

Total

Less than or equal to 80%

$ 1,885 $ 38,404 $ 40,289 77.6 %

Over 80% through 90%

172 2,805 2,977 5.7

Over 90% through 100%

133 1,259 1,392 2.7

Over 100%

187 1,593 1,780 3.4

No LTV available

98 98 .2

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools (a)

5,421 5,421 10.4

Total

$ 2,377 $ 49,580 $ 51,957 100.0 %

(a) Represents loans purchased from Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage pools whose payments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Home equity and second mortgages

(Dollars in Millions)

Lines Loans Total Percent
of Total

Prime Borrowers

Less than or equal to 80%

$ 9,466 $ 715 $ 10,181 67.8 %

Over 80% through 90%

2,027 227 2,254 15.0

Over 90% through 100%

901 103 1,004 6.7

Over 100%

1,206 113 1,319 8.8

No LTV/CLTV available

226 34 260 1.7

Total

$ 13,826 $ 1,192 $ 15,018 100.0 %

Sub-Prime Borrowers

Less than or equal to 80%

$ 38 $ 31 $ 69 27.5 %

Over 80% through 90%

12 23 35 14.0

Over 90% through 100%

10 28 38 15.1

Over 100%

27 79 106 42.2

No LTV/CLTV available

3 3 1.2

Total

$ 87 $ 164 $ 251 100.0 %

Other Borrowers

Less than or equal to 80%

$ 378 $ 13 $ 391 78.2 %

Over 80% through 90%

66 7 73 14.6

Over 90% through 100%

14 1 15 3.0

Over 100%

16 3 19 3.8

No LTV/CLTV available

2 2 .4

Total

$ 476 $ 24 $ 500 100.0 %

Total

Less than or equal to 80%

$ 9,882 $ 759 $ 10,641 67.5 %

Over 80% through 90%

2,105 257 2,362 15.0

Over 90% through 100%

925 132 1,057 6.7

Over 100%

1,249 195 1,444 9.1

No LTV/CLTV available

228 37 265 1.7

Total

$ 14,389 $ 1,380 $ 15,769 100.0 %

U.S. Bancorp 11


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2014, approximately $1.3 billion of residential mortgages were to customers that may be defined as sub-prime borrowers based on credit scores from independent agencies at loan origination, compared with $1.4 billion at December 31, 2013. In addition to residential mortgages, at September 30, 2014, $.3 billion of home equity and second mortgage loans were to customers that may be defined as sub-prime borrowers, unchanged from December 31, 2013. The total amount of consumer lending segment residential mortgage, home equity and second mortgage loans to customers that may be defined as sub-prime borrowers represented only .4 percent of total assets at September 30, 2014, compared with .5 percent at December 31, 2013. The Company considers sub-prime loans to be those made to borrowers with a risk of default significantly higher than those approved for prime lending programs, as reflected in credit scores obtained from independent agencies at loan origination, in addition to other credit underwriting criteria. Sub-prime portfolios include only loans originated according to the Company’s underwriting programs specifically designed to serve customers with weakened credit histories. The sub-prime designation indicators have been and will continue to be subject to re-evaluation over time as borrower characteristics, payment performance and economic conditions change. The sub-prime loans originated during periods from June 2009 and after are with borrowers who met the Company’s program guidelines and have a credit score that generally is at or below a threshold of 620 to 650 depending on the program. Sub-prime loans originated during periods prior to June 2009 were based upon program level guidelines without regard to credit score.

Covered loans included $880 million in loans with negative-amortization payment options at September 30, 2014, compared with $986 million at December 31, 2013. Other than covered loans, the Company does not have any residential mortgages with payment schedules that would cause balances to increase over time.

Home equity and second mortgages were $15.8 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $15.4 billion at December 31, 2013, and included $5.0 billion of home equity lines in a first lien position and $10.8 billion of home equity and second mortgage loans and lines in a junior lien position. Loans and lines in a junior lien position at September 30, 2014, included approximately $4.1 billion of loans and lines for which the Company also serviced the related first lien loan, and approximately $6.7 billion where the Company did not service the related first lien loan. The Company was able to determine the status of the related first liens using information the Company has as the servicer of the first lien or information reported on customer credit bureau files. The Company also evaluates other indicators of credit risk for these junior lien loans and lines including delinquency, estimated average CLTV ratios and updated weighted-average credit scores in making its assessment of credit risk, related loss estimates and determining the allowance for credit losses.

The following table provides a summary of delinquency statistics and other credit quality indicators

for the Company’s junior lien positions at September 30, 2014:

Junior Liens Behind

Company

Owned or
Serviced

Third Party
(Dollars in Millions) First Lien First Lien Total

Total

$ 4,070 $ 6,739 $ 10,809

Percent 30-89 days past due

.44 % .58 % .53 %

Percent 90 days or more past due

.09 % .13 % .11 %

Weighted-average CLTV

76 % 74 % 75 %

Weighted-average credit score

749 743 745

See the Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses section for additional information on how the Company determines the allowance for credit losses for loans in a junior lien position.

12 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Table 5 Delinquent Loan Ratios as a Percent of Ending Loan Balances

90 days or more past due excluding nonperforming loans September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Commercial

Commercial

.05 % .08 %

Lease financing

Total commercial

.05 .08

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial mortgages

.01 .02

Construction and development

.11 .30

Total commercial real estate

.03 .07

Residential Mortgages (a)

.41 .65

Credit Card

1.10 1.17

Other Retail

Retail leasing

.02

Other

.17 .21

Total other retail (b)

.16 .18

Total loans, excluding covered loans

.22 .31

Covered Loans

6.10 5.63

Total loans

.39 % .51 %
90 days or more past due including nonperforming loans September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Commercial

.27 % .27 %

Commercial real estate

.62 .83

Residential mortgages (a)

2.02 2.16

Credit card

1.32 1.60

Other retail (b)

.53 .58

Total loans, excluding covered loans

.84 .97

Covered loans

7.34 7.13

Total loans

1.03 % 1.19 %

(a) Delinquent loan ratios exclude $3.1 billion at September 30, 2014, and $3.7 billion at December 31, 2013, of loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Including these loans, the ratio of residential mortgages 90 days or more past due including all nonperforming loans was 7.91 percent at September 30, 2014, and 9.34 percent at December 31, 2013.
(b) Delinquent loan ratios exclude student loans that are guaranteed by the federal government. Including these loans, the ratio of total other retail loans 90 days or more past due including all nonperforming loans was .84 percent at September 30, 2014, and .93 percent at December 31, 2013.

Loan Delinquencies Trends in delinquency ratios are an indicator, among other considerations, of credit risk within the Company’s loan portfolios. The Company measures delinquencies, both including and excluding nonperforming loans, to enable comparability with other companies. Accruing loans 90 days or more past due totaled $962 million ($532 million excluding covered loans) at September 30, 2014, compared with $1.2 billion ($713 million excluding covered loans) at December 31, 2013. These balances exclude loans purchased from Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage pools whose repayments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Accruing loans 90 days or more past due are not included in nonperforming assets and continue to accrue interest because they are adequately secured by collateral, are in the process of collection and are reasonably expected to result in repayment or restoration to current status, or are managed in homogeneous portfolios with specified charge-off timeframes adhering to regulatory guidelines. The ratio of accruing loans 90 days or more past due to total loans was .39 percent (.22 percent excluding covered loans) at September 30, 2014, compared with .51 percent (.31 percent excluding covered loans) at December 31, 2013.

U.S. Bancorp 13


Table of Contents

The following table provides summary delinquency information for residential mortgages, credit card and other retail loans included in the consumer lending segment:

Amount As a Percent of Ending
Loan Balances
(Dollars in Millions) September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Residential Mortgages (a)

30-89 days

$ 243 $ 358 .46 % .70 %

90 days or more

211 333 .41 .65

Nonperforming

841 770 1.62 1.51

Total

$ 1,295 $ 1,461 2.49 % 2.86 %

Credit Card

30-89 days

$ 219 $ 226 1.23 % 1.25 %

90 days or more

196 210 1.10 1.17

Nonperforming

40 78 .22 .43

Total

$ 455 $ 514 2.55 % 2.85 %

Other Retail

Retail Leasing

30-89 days

$ 9 $ 11 .14 % .18 %

90 days or more

1 .02

Nonperforming

1 1 .02 .02

Total

$ 11 $ 12 .18 % .20 %

Home Equity and Second Mortgages

30-89 days

$ 80 $ 102 .51 % .66 %

90 days or more

41 49 .26 .32

Nonperforming

166 167 1.05 1.08

Total

$ 287 $ 318 1.82 % 2.06 %

Other (b)

30-89 days

$ 133 $ 132 .49 % .50 %

90 days or more

34 37 .13 .14

Nonperforming

17 23 .06 .09

Total

$ 184 $ 192 .68 % .73 %

(a) Excludes $422 million of loans 30-89 days past due and $3.1 billion of loans 90 days or more past due at September 30, 2014, purchased from GNMA mortgage pools that continue to accrue interest, compared with $440 million and $3.7 billion at December 31, 2013, respectively.
(b) Includes revolving credit, installment, automobile and student loans.

The following tables provide further information on residential mortgages and home equity and second mortgages as a percent of ending loan balances by borrower type:

Residential mortgages (a) September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Prime Borrowers

30-89 days

.39 % .55 %

90 days or more

.34 .55

Nonperforming

1.38 1.31

Total

2.11 % 2.41 %

Sub-Prime Borrowers

30-89 days

4.65 % 7.60 %

90 days or more

3.70 6.02

Nonperforming

16.08 13.19

Total

24.43 % 26.81 %

Other Borrowers

30-89 days

1.20 % 1.65 %

90 days or more

1.31 1.43

Nonperforming

3.11 2.09

Total

5.62 % 5.17 %

(a) Excludes delinquent and nonperforming information on loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools as their repayments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Home equity and second mortgages September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Prime Borrowers

30-89 days

.43 % .57 %

90 days or more

.24 .27

Nonperforming

.94 .98

Total

1.61 % 1.82 %

Sub-Prime Borrowers

30-89 days

3.59 % 4.39 %

90 days or more

1.19 2.03

Nonperforming

5.58 4.73

Total

10.36 % 11.15 %

Other Borrowers

30-89 days

1.20 % 1.24 %

90 days or more

.40 .62

Nonperforming

2.20 1.86

Total

3.80 % 3.72 %

14 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The following table provides summary delinquency information for covered loans:

Amount As a Percent of Ending
Loan Balances
(Dollars in Millions) September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

30-89 days

$ 102 $ 166 1.44 % 1.96 %

90 days or more

430 476 6.10 5.63

Nonperforming

88 127 1.25 1.50

Total

$ 620 $ 769 8.79 % 9.09 %

Restructured Loans In certain circumstances, the Company may modify the terms of a loan to maximize the collection of amounts due when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties or is expected to experience difficulties in the near-term. In most cases the modification is either a concessionary reduction in interest rate, extension of the maturity date or reduction in the principal balance that would otherwise not be considered.

Troubled Debt Restructurings Concessionary modifications are classified as TDRs unless the modification results in only an insignificant delay in the payments to be received. TDRs accrue interest if the borrower complies with the revised terms and conditions and has demonstrated repayment performance at a level commensurate with the modified terms over several payment cycles. At September 30, 2014, performing TDRs were $5.5 billion, compared with $6.0 billion at December 31, 2013. Loans classified as TDRs are considered impaired loans for reporting and measurement purposes.

The Company continues to work with customers to modify loans for borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulties, including those acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions. Many of the Company’s TDRs are determined on a case-by-case basis in connection with ongoing loan collection processes. The modifications vary within each of the Company’s loan classes. Commercial lending segment TDRs generally include extensions of the maturity date and may be accompanied by an increase or decrease to the interest rate. The Company may also work with the borrower to make other changes to the loan to mitigate losses, such as obtaining additional collateral and/or guarantees to support the loan.

The Company has also implemented certain residential mortgage loan restructuring programs that may result in TDRs. The Company participates in the U.S. Department of the Treasury Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”). HAMP gives qualifying homeowners an opportunity to permanently modify their loan and achieve more affordable monthly payments, with the U.S. Department of the Treasury compensating the Company for a portion of the reduction in monthly amounts due from borrowers participating in this program. The Company also modifies residential mortgage loans under Federal Housing Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, and its own internal programs. Under these programs, the Company provides concessions to qualifying borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. The concessions may include adjustments to interest rates, conversion of adjustable rates to fixed rates, extensions of maturity dates or deferrals of payments, capitalization of accrued interest and/or outstanding advances, or in limited situations, partial forgiveness of loan principal. In most instances, participation in residential mortgage loan restructuring programs requires the customer to complete a short-term trial period. A permanent loan modification is contingent on the customer successfully completing the trial period arrangement and the loan documents are not modified until that time. The Company reports loans in a trial period arrangement as TDRs.

Credit card and other retail loan modifications are generally part of distinct restructuring programs providing customers modification solutions over a specified time period, generally up to 60 months.

In accordance with regulatory guidance, the Company considers secured consumer loans that have had debt discharged through bankruptcy where the borrower has not reaffirmed the debt to be TDRs. If the loan amount exceeds the collateral value, the loan is charged down to collateral value and the remaining amount is reported as nonperforming.

Modifications to loans in the covered segment are similar in nature to that described above for non-covered loans, and the evaluation and determination of TDR status is similar, except that acquired loans restructured after acquisition are not considered TDRs for purposes of the Company’s accounting and disclosure if the loans evidenced credit deterioration as of the acquisition date and are accounted for in pools. Losses associated with modifications on covered loans, including the economic impact of interest rate reductions, are generally eligible for reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements.

U.S. Bancorp 15


Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of TDRs by loan class, including the delinquency status for TDRs that continue to accrue interest and TDRs included in nonperforming assets:

As a Percent of Performing TDRs

At September 30, 2014

(Dollars in Millions)

Performing
TDRs
30-89 Days
Past Due
90 Days or More
Past Due
Nonperforming
TDRs
Total
TDRs

Commercial

$ 235 1.5 % 1.6 % $ 92 (a) $ 327

Commercial real estate

284 1.3 .6 95 (b) 379

Residential mortgages

1,899 4.7 4.7 539 2,438 (d)

Credit card

216 8.9 6.6 40 (c) 256

Other retail

184 6.2 4.7 64 (c) 248 (e)

TDRs, excluding GNMA and covered loans

2,818 4.5 4.2 830 3,648

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

2,478 8.1 53.8 2,478 (f)

Covered loans

207 7.8 1.6 38 245

Total

$ 5,503 6.3 % 26.4 % $ 868 $ 6,371

(a) Primarily represents loans less than six months from the modification date that have not met the performance period required to return to accrual status (generally six months) and small business credit cards with a modified rate equal to 0 percent.
(b) Primarily represents loans less than six months from the modification date that have not met the performance period required to return to accrual status (generally six months).
(c) Primarily represents loans with a modified rate equal to 0 percent.
(d) Includes $318 million of residential mortgage loans to borrowers that have had debt discharged through bankruptcy and $99 million in trial period arrangements or previously placed in trial period arrangements but not successfully completed.
(e) Includes $140 million of other retail loans to borrowers that have had debt discharged through bankruptcy and $6 million in trial period arrangements or previously placed in trial period arrangements but not successfully completed.
(f) Includes $492 million of Federal Housing Administration and Department of Veterans Affairs residential mortgage loans to borrowers that have had debt discharged through bankruptcy and $665 million in trial period arrangements or previously placed in trial period arrangements but not successfully completed.

Short-term Modifications The Company makes short-term modifications that it does not consider to be TDRs, in limited circumstances, to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. Consumer lending programs include payment reductions, deferrals of up to three past due payments, and the ability to return to current status if the borrower makes required payments. The Company may also make short-term modifications to commercial lending loans, with the most common modification being an extension of the maturity date of three months or less. Such extensions generally are used when the maturity date is imminent and the borrower is experiencing some level of financial stress, but the Company believes the borrower will pay all contractual amounts owed. Short-term modified loans were not material at September 30, 2014.

16 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Table 6 Nonperforming Assets (a)

(Dollars in Millions) September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Commercial

Commercial

$ 161 $ 122

Lease financing

12 12

Total commercial

173 134

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial mortgages

147 182

Construction and development

94 121

Total commercial real estate

241 303

Residential Mortgages (b)

841 770

Credit Card

40 78

Other Retail

Retail leasing

1 1

Other

183 190

Total other retail

184 191

Total nonperforming loans, excluding covered loans

1,479 1,476

Covered Loans

88 127

Total nonperforming loans

1,567 1,603

Other Real Estate (c)(d)

275 327

Covered Other Real Estate (d)

72 97

Other Assets

9 10

Total nonperforming assets

$ 1,923 $ 2,037

Total nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets

$ 1,763 $ 1,813

Excluding covered assets

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due (b)

$ 532 $ 713

Nonperforming loans to total loans

.62 % .65 %

Nonperforming assets to total loans plus other real estate (c)

.74 % .80 %

Including covered assets

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due (b)

$ 962 $ 1,189

Nonperforming loans to total loans

.64 % .68 %

Nonperforming assets to total loans plus other real estate (c)

.78 % .86 %

Changes in Nonperforming Assets

(Dollars in Millions) Commercial and
Commercial
Real Estate
Credit Card,
Other Retail
and Residential
Mortgages
Covered
Assets
Total

Balance December 31, 2013

$ 494 $ 1,319 $ 224 $ 2,037

Additions to nonperforming assets

New nonaccrual loans and foreclosed properties

362 512 55 929

Advances on loans

42 42

Total additions

404 512 55 971

Reductions in nonperforming assets

Paydowns, payoffs

(145 ) (199 ) (69 ) (413 )

Net sales

(104 ) (93 ) (47 ) (244 )

Return to performing status

(18 ) (100 ) (2 ) (120 )

Charge-offs (e)

(174 ) (133 ) (1 ) (308 )

Total reductions

(441 ) (525 ) (119 ) (1,085 )

Net additions to (reductions in) nonperforming assets

(37 ) (13 ) (64 ) (114 )

Balance September 30, 2014

$ 457 $ 1,306 $ 160 $ 1,923

(a) Throughout this document, nonperforming assets and related ratios do not include accruing loans 90 days or more past due.
(b) Excludes $3.1 billion and $3.7 billion at September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively, of loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools that are 90 days or more past due that continue to accrue interest, as their repayments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(c) Foreclosed GNMA loans of $623 million and $527 million at September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively, continue to accrue interest and are recorded as other assets and excluded from nonperforming assets because they are insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(d) Includes equity investments in entities whose principal assets are other real estate owned.
(e) Charge-offs exclude actions for certain card products and loan sales that were not classified as nonperforming at the time the charge-off occurred.

U.S. Bancorp 17


Table of Contents

Nonperforming Assets The level of nonperforming assets represents another indicator of the potential for future credit losses. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms and not accruing interest, restructured loans that have not met the performance period required to return to accrual status, other real estate owned and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. Nonperforming assets are generally either originated by the Company or acquired under FDIC loss sharing agreements that substantially reduce the risk of credit losses to the Company. Interest payments collected from assets on nonaccrual status are generally applied against the principal balance and not recorded as income. However, interest income may be recognized for interest payments if the remaining carrying amount of the loan is believed to be collectible.

At September 30, 2014, total nonperforming assets were $1.9 billion, compared with $2.0 billion at December 31, 2013. Excluding covered assets, nonperforming assets were $1.8 billion at September 30, 2014, representing a $50 million (2.8 percent) decrease from December 31, 2013. The decrease in nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets, was primarily driven by reductions in the commercial mortgage portfolio, as well as by improvement in construction and development and credit card loans. Nonperforming covered assets at September 30, 2014, were $160 million, compared with $224 million at December 31, 2013. The loss sharing agreement for the majority of the nonperforming covered assets expires in the fourth quarter of 2014. The ratio of total nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate was .78 percent (.74 percent excluding covered assets) at September 30, 2014, compared with .86 percent (.80 percent excluding covered assets) at December 31, 2013. The Company expects total nonperforming assets to remain relatively stable in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Other real estate owned, excluding covered assets, was $275 million at September 30, 2014, compared with $327 million at December 31, 2013, and was related to foreclosed properties that previously secured loan balances. These balances exclude foreclosed GNMA loans whose repayments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The following table provides an analysis of other real estate owned, excluding covered assets, as a percent of their related loan balances, including geographical location detail for residential (residential mortgage, home equity and second mortgage) and commercial (commercial and commercial real estate) loan balances:

Amount

As a Percent of Ending

Loan Balances

(Dollars in Millions) September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Residential

Florida

$ 18 $ 17 1.10 % 1.03 %

Minnesota

15 15 .24 .24

Illinois

14 14 .32 .36

Washington

13 16 .32 .40

Colorado

12 13 .28 .31

All other states

164 191 .35 .41

Total residential

236 266 .35 .40

Commercial

California

11 14 .06 .08

Missouri

5 14 .11 .30

Tennessee

3 5 .13 .25

Indiana

3 .22

Virginia

3 2 .19 .16

All other states

14 26 .02 .03

Total commercial

39 61 .03 .06

Total

$ 275 $ 327 .12 % .14 %

Analysis of Loan Net Charge-Offs Total loan net charge-offs were $336 million for the third quarter and $1.0 billion for the first nine months of 2014, compared with $328 million and $1.2 billion for the same periods of 2013. The ratio of total loan net charge-offs to average loans outstanding on an annualized basis for the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 was .55 percent and .57 percent, respectively, compared with .57 percent and .68 percent for the third quarter and first nine months of 2013, respectively. The year-over-year changes in total net charge-offs reflected higher commercial loan charge-offs and lower recoveries in commercial and commercial real estate, offset by improvements in residential mortgages and home equity and second mortgages. Given current economic conditions, the Company expects the level of net charge-offs to remain relatively stable in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Commercial and commercial real estate loan net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2014 were $62 million (.21 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $5 million (.02 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the third quarter of 2013. Commercial and commercial real estate loan net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2014 were $146 million (.17 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $80 million (.10 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the first nine months of 2013.

18 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Table 7 Net Charge-offs as a Percent of Average Loans Outstanding

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013

Commercial

Commercial

.29 % .11 % .27 % .18 %

Lease financing

.46 (.53 ) .29

Total commercial

.30 .06 .27 .17

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial mortgages

.01 .03 (.03 ) .11

Construction and development

.13 (.46 ) .05 (.59 )

Total commercial real estate

.04 (.06 ) (.01 ) (.01 )

Residential Mortgages

.32 .46 .40 .63

Credit Card

3.53 3.75 3.80 3.96

Other Retail

Retail leasing

.07 .02 .02

Home equity and second mortgages

.61 1.09 .67 1.45

Other

.72 .83 .70 .81

Total other retail

.59 .83 .61 .94

Total loans, excluding covered loans

.56 .58 .59 .70

Covered Loans

.05 .33 .14 .36

Total loans

.55 % .57 % .57 % .68 %

Residential mortgage loan net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2014 were $42 million (.32 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $57 million (.46 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the third quarter of 2013. Residential mortgage loan net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2014 were $156 million (.40 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $223 million (.63 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the first nine months of 2013. Credit card loan net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2014 were $158 million (3.53 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $160 million (3.75 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the third quarter of 2013. Credit card loan net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2014 were $498 million (3.80 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $493 million (3.96 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the first nine months of 2013. Other retail loan net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2014 were $73 million (.59 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $98 million (.83 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the third quarter of 2013. Other retail loan net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2014 were $218 million (.61 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis), compared with $329 million (.94 percent of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis) for the first nine months of 2013. The year-over-year decreases in total residential mortgage, credit card and other retail loan net charge-offs reflected the improvement in economic conditions.

The following table provides an analysis of net charge-offs as a percent of average loans outstanding for residential mortgages and home equity and second mortgages by borrower type:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Average Loans Percent of
Average
Loans
Average Loans Percent of
Average
Loans
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013

Residential Mortgages

Prime borrowers

$ 44,247 $ 41,224 .26 % .40 % $ 43,844 $ 39,187 .32 % .55 %

Sub-prime borrowers

1,284 1,450 3.40 3.28 1,322 1,500 4.35 4.90

Other borrowers

845 903 .94 .88 873 875 .92 1.07

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools (a)

5,618 5,562 .07 5,760 5,493 .07 .02

Total

$ 51,994 $ 49,139 .32 % .46 % $ 51,799 $ 47,055 .40 % .63 %

Home Equity and Second Mortgages

Prime borrowers

$ 14,949 $ 14,885 .50 % .99 % $ 14,703 $ 15,248 .58 % 1.29 %

Sub-prime borrowers

255 312 6.22 6.36 269 333 5.46 8.03

Other borrowers

500 451 .79 .88 495 440 .81 2.13

Total

$ 15,704 $ 15,648 .61 % 1.09 % $ 15,467 $ 16,021 .67 % 1.45 %

(a) Represents loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools whose payments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

U.S. Bancorp 19


Table of Contents

Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses The allowance for credit losses reserves for probable and estimable losses incurred in the Company’s loan and lease portfolio, including unfunded credit commitments, and includes certain amounts that do not represent loss exposure to the Company because those losses are recoverable under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. The allowance for credit losses is increased through provisions charged to operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs. Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to ensure it appropriately reserves for incurred losses.

The allowance recorded for loans in the commercial lending segment is based on reviews of individual credit relationships and considers the migration analysis of commercial lending segment loans and actual loss experience. In the migration analysis applied to risk-rated loan portfolios, the Company currently examines up to a 13-year period of historical loss experience. For each loan type, this historical loss experience is adjusted as necessary to consider any relevant changes in portfolio composition, lending policies, underwriting standards, risk management practices or economic conditions. The results of the analysis are evaluated quarterly to confirm an appropriate historical timeframe is selected for each commercial loan type. The allowance recorded for impaired loans greater than $5 million in the commercial lending segment is based on an individual loan analysis utilizing expected cash flows discounted using the original effective interest rate, the observable market price of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans, rather than the migration analysis. The allowance recorded for all other commercial lending segment loans is determined on a homogenous pool basis and includes consideration of product mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, bankruptcy experience, and historical losses, adjusted for current trends.

The allowance recorded for TDR loans and purchased impaired loans in the consumer lending segment is determined on a homogenous pool basis utilizing expected cash flows discounted using the original effective interest rate of the pool, or the prior quarter effective rate, respectively. The allowance for collateral-dependent loans in the consumer lending segment is determined based on the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell. The allowance recorded for all other consumer lending segment loans is determined on a homogenous pool basis and includes consideration of product mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, bankruptcy experience, delinquency status, refreshed LTV ratios when possible, portfolio growth and historical losses, adjusted for current trends. Credit card and other retail loans 90 days or more past due are generally not placed on nonaccrual status because of the relatively short period of time to charge-off and, therefore, are excluded from nonperforming loans and measures that include nonperforming loans as part of the calculation.

When evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses for any loans and lines in a junior lien position, the Company considers the delinquency and modification status of the first lien. At September 30, 2014, the Company serviced the first lien on 38 percent of the home equity loans and lines in a junior lien position. The Company also considers information received from its primary regulator on the status of the first liens that are serviced by other large servicers in the industry and the status of first lien mortgage accounts reported on customer credit bureau files. Regardless of whether or not the Company services the first lien, an assessment is made of economic conditions, problem loans, recent loss experience and other factors in determining the allowance for credit losses. Based on the available information, the Company estimated $357 million or 2.3 percent of the total home equity portfolio at September 30, 2014, represented junior liens where the first lien was delinquent or modified.

The Company uses historical loss experience on the loans and lines in a junior lien position where the first lien is serviced by the Company, or can be identified in credit bureau data, to establish loss estimates for junior lien loans and lines the Company services that are current, but the first lien is delinquent or modified. Historically, the number of junior lien defaults in any period has been a small percentage of the total portfolio (for example, only 1.1 percent for the twelve months ended September 30, 2014), and the long-term average loss rate on the small percentage of loans that default has been approximately 80 percent. In addition, the Company obtains updated credit scores on its home equity portfolio each quarter, and in some cases more frequently, and uses this information to qualitatively supplement its loss estimation methods. Credit score distributions for the portfolio are monitored monthly and any changes in the distribution are one of the factors considered in assessing the Company’s loss estimates. In its evaluation of the allowance for credit losses, the Company also considers the increased risk of loss associated with home equity lines that are contractually scheduled to convert from a revolving status to a fully amortizing payment and with residential lines and loans that have a balloon payoff provision.

20 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The allowance for the covered loan segment is evaluated each quarter in a manner similar to that described for non-covered loans, and reflects decreases in expected cash flows on those loans after the acquisition date. The provision for credit losses for covered loans considers the indemnification provided by the FDIC.

In addition, the evaluation of the appropriate allowance for credit losses for purchased non-impaired loans acquired after January 1, 2009, in the various loan segments considers credit discounts recorded as a part of the initial determination of the fair value of the loans. For these loans, no allowance for credit losses is recorded at the purchase date. Credit discounts representing the principal losses expected over the life of the loans are a component of the initial fair value. Subsequent to the purchase date, the methods utilized to estimate the required allowance for credit losses for these loans is similar to originated loans; however, the Company records a provision for credit losses only when the required allowance, net of any expected reimbursement under any loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, exceeds any remaining credit discounts.

The evaluation of the appropriate allowance for credit losses for purchased impaired loans in the various loan segments considers the expected cash flows to be collected from the borrower. These loans are initially recorded at fair value and therefore no allowance for credit losses is recorded at the purchase date.

Subsequent to the purchase date, the expected cash flows of purchased loans are subject to evaluation. Decreases in expected cash flows are recognized by recording an allowance for credit losses with the related provision for credit losses reduced for the amount reimbursable by the FDIC, where applicable. If the expected cash flows on the purchased loans increase such that a previously recorded impairment allowance can be reversed, the Company records a reduction in the allowance with a related reduction in losses reimbursable by the FDIC, where applicable. Increases in expected cash flows of purchased loans, when there are no reversals of previous impairment allowances, are recognized over the remaining life of the loans and resulting decreases in expected cash flows of the FDIC indemnification assets are amortized over the shorter of the remaining contractual term of the indemnification agreements or the remaining life of the loans. Refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for more information.

The Company’s methodology for determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses for all the loan segments also considers the imprecision inherent in the methodologies used. As a result, in addition to the amounts determined under the methodologies described above, management also considers the potential impact of other qualitative factors which include, but are not limited to, economic factors; geographic and other concentration risks; delinquency and nonaccrual trends; current business conditions; changes in lending policy, underwriting standards, internal review and other relevant business practices; and the regulatory environment. The consideration of these items results in adjustments to allowance amounts included in the Company’s allowance for credit losses for each of the above loan segments.

Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for further discussion on the analysis and determination of the allowance for credit losses.

At September 30, 2014, the allowance for credit losses was $4.4 billion (1.80 percent of total loans and 1.81 percent of loans excluding covered loans), compared with $4.5 billion (1.93 percent of total loans and 1.94 percent of loans excluding covered loans) at December 31, 2013. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans was 282 percent (291 percent excluding covered loans) at September 30, 2014, compared with 283 percent (297 percent excluding covered loans) at December 31, 2013. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to annualized loan net charge-offs was 331 percent at September 30, 2014, compared with 310 percent of full year 2013 net charge-offs at December 31, 2013, reflecting the impact of improving economic conditions over the past year.

U.S. Bancorp 21


Table of Contents
Table 8 Summary of Allowance for Credit Losses

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 4,449 $ 4,612 $ 4,537 $ 4,733

Charge-Offs

Commercial

Commercial

71 57 197 157

Lease financing

9 8 22 27

Total commercial

80 65 219 184

Commercial real estate

Commercial mortgages

5 14 15 57

Construction and development

5 3 12 19

Total commercial real estate

10 17 27 76

Residential mortgages

48 62 171 243

Credit card

174 175 546 559

Other retail

Retail leasing

1 1 4 4

Home equity and second mortgages

31 51 98 195

Other

64 70 189 213

Total other retail

96 122 291 412

Covered loans (a)

2 9 10 31

Total charge-offs

410 450 1,264 1,505

Recoveries

Commercial

Commercial

19 39 59 73

Lease financing

3 15 11 27

Total commercial

22 54 70 100

Commercial real estate

Commercial mortgages

4 12 21 32

Construction and development

2 11 9 48

Total commercial real estate

6 23 30 80

Residential mortgages

6 5 15 20

Credit card

16 15 48 66

Other retail

Retail leasing

1 3 3

Home equity and second mortgages

7 8 20 21

Other

15 16 50 59

Total other retail

23 24 73 83

Covered loans (a)

1 1 2 3

Total recoveries

74 122 238 352

Net Charge-Offs

Commercial

Commercial

52 18 138 84

Lease financing

6 (7 ) 11

Total commercial

58 11 149 84

Commercial real estate

Commercial mortgages

1 2 (6 ) 25

Construction and development

3 (8 ) 3 (29 )

Total commercial real estate

4 (6 ) (3 ) (4 )

Residential mortgages

42 57 156 223

Credit card

158 160 498 493

Other retail

Retail leasing

1 1 1

Home equity and second mortgages

24 43 78 174

Other

49 54 139 154

Total other retail

73 98 218 329

Covered loans (a)

1 8 8 28

Total net charge-offs

336 328 1,026 1,153

Provision for credit losses

311 298 941 1,063

Other changes (b)

(10 ) (4 ) (38 ) (65 )

Balance at end of period (c)

$ 4,414 $ 4,578 $ 4,414 $ 4,578

Components

Allowance for loan losses

$ 4,065 $ 4,258

Liability for unfunded credit commitments

349 320

Total allowance for credit losses

$ 4,414 $ 4,578

Allowance for Credit Losses as a Percentage of

Period-end loans, excluding covered loans

1.81 % 1.99 %

Nonperforming loans, excluding covered loans

291 294

Nonperforming and accruing loans 90 days or more past due, excluding covered loans

214 211

Nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets

245 235

Annualized net charge-offs, excluding covered loans

324 348

Period-end loans

1.80 % 1.98 %

Nonperforming loans

282 276

Nonperforming and accruing loans 90 days or more past due

175 166

Nonperforming assets

230 207

Annualized net charge-offs

331 352

(a) Relates to covered loan charge-offs and recoveries not reimbursable by the FDIC.
(b) Includes net changes in credit losses to be reimbursed by the FDIC and reductions in the allowance for covered loans where the reversal of a previously recorded allowance was offset by an associated decrease in the indemnification asset, and the impact of any loan sales.
(c) At September 30, 2014 and 2013, $1.7 billion of the total allowance for credit losses related to incurred losses on credit card and other retail loans.

22 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Residual Value Risk Management The Company manages its risk to changes in the residual value of leased assets through disciplined residual valuation setting at the inception of a lease, diversification of its leased assets, regular residual asset valuation reviews and monitoring of residual value gains or losses upon the disposition of assets. As of September 30, 2014, no significant change in the amount of residual values or concentration of the portfolios had occurred since December 31, 2013. Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Residual Value Risk Management” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for further discussion on residual value risk management.

Operational Risk Management Operational risk is inherent in all business activities, and the management of this risk is important to the achievement of the Company’s objectives. Business lines have direct and primary responsibility and accountability for identifying, controlling, and monitoring operational risks embedded in their business activities. Business managers maintain a system of controls with the objective of providing proper transaction authorization and execution, proper system operations, proper oversight of third parties with whom they do business, safeguarding of assets from misuse or theft, and ensuring the reliability and security of financial and other data. Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Operational Risk Management” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for further discussion on operational risk management.

Compliance Risk Management The Company may suffer legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss, or damage to reputation through failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, standards of good practice, and codes of conduct. The Company has controls and processes in place to ensure assessment, identification, monitoring, management and reporting of compliance risks and issues.

Interest Rate Risk Management In the banking industry, changes in interest rates are a significant risk that can impact earnings, market valuations and the safety and soundness of an entity. To manage the impact on net interest income and the market value of assets and liabilities, the Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by its Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”) and approved by the Board of Directors. The ALCO has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with the ALCO management policies, including interest rate risk exposure. The Company uses net interest income simulation analysis and market value of equity modeling for measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk.

Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis Management estimates the impact on net interest income of changes in market interest rates under a number of scenarios, including gradual shifts, immediate and sustained parallel shifts, and flattening or steepening of the yield curve. The table below summarizes the projected impact to net interest income over the next 12 months of various potential interest rate changes. The ALCO policy limits the estimated change in net interest income in a gradual 200 basis point (“bps”) rate change scenario to a 4.0 percent decline of forecasted net interest income over the next 12 months. At September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, the Company was within policy. Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for further discussion on net interest income simulation analysis.

Market Value of Equity Modeling The Company also manages interest rate sensitivity by utilizing market value of equity modeling, which measures the degree to which the market values of the Company’s assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments will change given a change in interest rates. Management measures the impact of changes in market interest rates under a number of scenarios, including immediate and sustained parallel shifts, and flattening or steepening of the yield curve. The ALCO policy limits the change in market value of equity in a 200 bps parallel rate shock to a 15.0 percent decline. A 200 bps increase would have resulted in a 4.3 percent decrease in the market value of equity at September 30, 2014, compared with a 5.1 percent decrease at December 31, 2013. A 200 bps decrease, where possible given current rates, would have resulted in a 4.4 percent decrease in the market value of equity at September 30, 2014, compared with a .8 percent decrease at December 31, 2013. Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Market Value of Equity Modeling” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for further discussion on market value of equity modeling.

Sensitivity of Net Interest Income

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Down 50 bps
Immediate
Up 50 bps
Immediate
Down 200 bps
Gradual
Up 200 bps
Gradual
Down 50 bps
Immediate
Up 50 bps
Immediate
Down 200 bps
Gradual
Up 200 bps
Gradual

Net interest income

* 1.30 % * 1.75 % * 1.07 % * 1.53 %

* Given the current level of interest rates, a downward rate scenario can not be computed.

U.S. Bancorp 23


Table of Contents

Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate and Other Risks To manage the sensitivity of earnings and capital to interest rate, prepayment, credit, price and foreign currency fluctuations (asset and liability management positions), the Company enters into derivative transactions. The Company uses derivatives for asset and liability management purposes primarily in the following ways:

To convert fixed-rate debt from fixed-rate payments to floating-rate payments;

To convert the cash flows associated with floating-rate loans and debt from floating-rate payments to fixed-rate payments;

To mitigate changes in value of the Company’s mortgage origination pipeline, funded mortgage loans held for sale and MSRs;

To mitigate remeasurement volatility of foreign currency denominated balances; and

To mitigate the volatility of the Company’s investment in foreign operations driven by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

To manage these risks, the Company may enter into exchange-traded, centrally cleared and over-the-counter derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, swaptions, futures, forwards and options. In addition, the Company enters into interest rate and foreign exchange derivative contracts to support the business requirements of its customers (customer-related positions). The Company historically has minimized the market and liquidity risks of customer-related positions by entering into similar offsetting positions with broker-dealers. In 2014, the Company began to actively manage the risks from its exposure to customer-related interest rate positions on a portfolio basis by entering into other derivative or non-derivative financial instruments that partially or fully offset the exposure from these customer-related positions. The Company does not utilize derivatives for speculative purposes.

The Company does not designate all of the derivatives that it enters into for risk management purposes as accounting hedges because of the inefficiency of applying the accounting requirements and may instead elect fair value accounting for the related hedged items. In particular, the Company enters into interest rate swaps, forward commitments to buy to-be-announced securities (“TBAs”), U.S. Treasury futures and options on U.S. Treasury futures to mitigate fluctuations in the value of its MSRs, but does not designate those derivatives as accounting hedges.

Additionally, the Company uses forward commitments to sell TBAs and other commitments to sell residential mortgage loans at specified prices to economically hedge the interest rate risk in its residential mortgage loan production activities. At September 30, 2014, the Company had $6.6 billion of forward commitments to sell, hedging $3.1 billion of mortgage loans held for sale and $4.4 billion of unfunded mortgage loan commitments. The forward commitments to sell and the unfunded mortgage loan commitments on loans intended to be sold are considered derivatives under the accounting guidance related to accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company has elected the fair value option for the mortgage loans held for sale.

Derivatives are subject to credit risk associated with counterparties to the contracts. Credit risk associated with derivatives is measured by the Company based on the probability of counterparty default. The Company manages the credit risk of its derivative positions by diversifying its positions among various counterparties, by entering into master netting agreements, and, where possible by requiring collateral agreements. The Company may also transfer counterparty credit risk related to interest rate swaps to third parties through the use of risk participation agreements. In addition, certain interest rate swaps and forwards and credit contracts are required to be centrally cleared through clearing houses to further mitigate counterparty credit risk.

For additional information on derivatives and hedging activities, refer to Notes 13 and 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Market Risk Management In addition to interest rate risk, the Company is exposed to other forms of market risk, principally related to trading activities which support customers’ strategies to manage their own foreign currency, interest rate risk and funding activities. For purposes of its internal capital adequacy assessment process, the Company considers risk arising from its trading activities employing methodologies consistent with the requirements of regulatory rules for market risk. The Company’s Market Risk Committee (“MRC”), within the framework of the ALCO, oversees market risk management. The MRC monitors and reviews the Company’s trading positions and establishes policies for market risk management, including exposure limits for each portfolio. The Company uses a Value at Risk (“VaR”) approach to measure general market risk. Theoretically, VaR represents the statistical risk of loss the Company has to adverse market movements over a one-day time horizon. The Company uses the Historical Simulation method to calculate VaR for its trading businesses measured at the ninety-ninth percentile using a one-year look-back period for distributions derived from past market data. The market factors used in the calculations include those pertinent to market risks

24 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

inherent in the underlying trading portfolios, principally those that affect its corporate bond trading business, foreign currency transaction business, client derivatives business, loan trading business and municipal securities business. On average, the Company expects the one-day VaR to be exceeded by actual losses two to three times per year for its trading businesses. The Company monitors the effectiveness of its risk programs by back-testing the performance of its VaR models, regularly updating the historical data used by the VaR models and stress testing. If the Company were to experience market losses in excess of the estimated VaR more often than expected, the VaR models and associated assumptions would be analyzed and adjusted.

The average, high, low and period-end VaR amounts for the Company’s trading positions were as follows:

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in Millions)

2014 2013

Average

$ 1 $ 1

High

2 3

Low

1 1

Period-end

1 2

The Company did not experience any actual trading losses for its combined trading businesses that exceeded VaR by more than a negligible amount during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The Company stress tests its market risk measurements to provide management with perspectives on market events that may not be captured by its VaR models, including worst case historical market movement combinations that have not necessarily occurred on the same date.

The Company calculates Stressed VaR using the same underlying methodology and model as VaR, except that a historical continuous one-year look-back period is utilized that reflects a period of significant financial stress appropriate to the Company’s trading portfolio. The period selected by the Company includes the significant market volatility of the last four months of 2008.

The average, high, low and period-end Stressed VaR amounts for the Company’s trading positions were as follows:

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in Millions)

2014 2013

Average

$ 4 $ 4

High

8 8

Low

2 2

Period-end

5 4

Valuations of positions in the client derivatives and foreign currency transaction businesses are based on standard cash flow or other valuation techniques using market-based assumptions. These valuations are compared to third party quotes or other market prices to determine if there are significant differences. Significant differences are approved by the Company’s market risk management department. Valuation of positions in the corporate bond trading, loan trading and municipal securities businesses are based on trader marks. These trader marks are evaluated against third party prices, with material variances approved by the Company’s risk management department.

The Company also measures the market risk of its hedging activities related to residential mortgage loans held for sale and MSRs using the Historical Simulation method. The VaRs are measured at the ninety-ninth percentile and employ factors pertinent to the market risks inherent in the valuation of the assets and hedges. The Company monitors the effectiveness of the models through back-testing, updating the data and regular validations. A three-year look-back period is used to obtain past market data for the residential mortgage loans held for sale and related hedges. A seven-year look-back period is used to obtain past market data for the MSRs and related hedges.

The average, high and low VaR amounts for the residential mortgage loans held for sale and related hedges and the MSRs and related hedges were as follows:

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in Millions)

2014 2013

Residential Mortgage Loans Held For Sale and Related Hedges

Average

$ 1 $ 2

High

2 4

Low

Mortgage Servicing Rights and Related Hedges

Average

$ 3 $ 3

High

8 6

Low

2 1

Liquidity Risk Management The Company’s liquidity risk management process is designed to identify, measure, and manage the Company’s funding and liquidity risk to meet its daily funding needs and to address expected and unexpected changes in its funding requirements. The Company engages in various activities to manage its liquidity risk. These activities include diversifying its funding sources, stress testing, and holding readily-marketable assets which can be used as a source of liquidity if needed. In addition, the Company’s profitable operations, sound credit quality and strong capital position have enabled it to develop a large and reliable base of core deposit funding within its market areas and in domestic and global capital markets.

The Risk Management Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors oversees the Company’s liquidity risk management process, and approves the Company’s liquidity policy and contingency funding plan. The ALCO reviews and approves the Company’s liquidity policy and guidelines, and regularly assesses the

U.S. Bancorp 25


Table of Contents

Company’s ability to meet funding requirements arising from adverse company-specific or market events.

The Company regularly projects its funding needs under various stress scenarios and maintains a contingency plan consistent with the Company’s access to diversified sources of contingent funding. The Company maintains a substantial level of total available liquidity in the form of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet funding sources. These include cash at the Federal Reserve Bank, unencumbered liquid assets, and capacity to borrow at the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank’s Discount Window. At September 30, 2014, the fair value of unencumbered available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities totaled $82.9 billion, compared with $61.7 billion at December 31, 2013. Refer to Table 4 and “Balance Sheet Analysis” for further information on investment securities maturities and trends. Asset liquidity is further enhanced by the Company’s ability to pledge loans to access secured borrowing facilities through the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank. At September 30, 2014, the Company could have borrowed an additional $78.9 billion at the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank based on collateral available for additional borrowings.

The Company’s diversified deposit base provides a sizeable source of relatively stable and low-cost funding, while reducing the Company’s reliance on the wholesale markets. Total deposits were $273.1 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $262.1 billion at December 31, 2013. Refer to “Balance Sheet Analysis” for further information on the Company’s deposits.

Additional funding is provided by long-term debt and short-term borrowings. Long-term debt was $30.8 billion at September 30, 2014, and is an important funding source because of its multi-year borrowing structure. Short-term borrowings were $30.0 billion at September 30, 2014, and supplement the Company’s other funding sources. Refer to “Balance Sheet Analysis” for further information on the Company’s long-term debt and short-term borrowings.

In addition to assessing liquidity risk on a consolidated basis, the Company monitors the parent company’s liquidity and maintains sufficient funding to meet expected parent company obligations, without access to the wholesale funding markets or dividends from subsidiaries, for 12 months when forecasted payments of common stock dividends are included and 24 months assuming dividends were reduced to zero. The parent company currently has available funds considerably greater than the amounts required to satisfy these conditions.

At September 30, 2014, parent company long-term debt outstanding was $13.6 billion, compared with $11.4 billion at December 31, 2013. The $2.2 billion increase was due to the issuances of $2.3 billion of medium-term notes and $1.0 billion of subordinated notes, partially offset by the maturity of $1.0 billion of medium-term notes. As of September 30, 2014, there was $.5 billion of parent company debt scheduled to mature in the remainder of 2014.

In 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued Basel III, a global regulatory framework proposed to enhance international capital and liquidity standards. In September 2014, U.S. banking regulators approved a final regulatory Liquidity Coverage Ratio (“LCR”), similar to the measure proposed by the Basel Committee as part of Basel III, requiring banks to maintain an adequate level of unencumbered high quality liquid assets to meet estimated liquidity needs over a 30-day stressed period. The LCR requirement is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2015, subject to certain transition provisions over the next two years to full implementation by January 1, 2017. The Company expects it will be compliant with the fully implemented LCR requirement by December 31, 2014.

Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity Risk Management” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for further discussion on liquidity risk management.

European Exposures Certain European countries have experienced severe credit deterioration. The Company does not hold sovereign debt of any European country, but may have indirect exposure to sovereign debt through its investments in, and transactions with, European banks. At September 30, 2014, the Company had investments in perpetual preferred stock issued by European banks with an amortized cost totaling $67 million and unrealized losses totaling $2 million, compared with an amortized cost totaling $70 million and unrealized losses totaling $7 million, at December 31, 2013. The Company also transacts with various European banks as counterparties to interest rate, mortgage-related and foreign currency derivatives for its hedging and customer-related activities; however, none of these banks are domiciled in the countries experiencing the most significant credit deterioration. These derivatives are subject to master netting arrangements. In addition, interest rate and foreign currency derivative transactions are subject to collateral arrangements which significantly limit the Company’s exposure to loss as they generally require daily posting of collateral. At

26 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

September 30, 2014, the Company was in a net receivable position with four banks in the United Kingdom, two banks in France and one bank in Switzerland, totaling $23 million. The Company was in a net payable position to each of the other European banks.

The Company has not bought or sold credit protection on the debt of any European country or any company domiciled in Europe, nor does it provide retail lending services in Europe. While the Company does not offer commercial lending services in Europe, it does provide financing to domestic multinational corporations that generate revenue from customers in European countries and provides a limited number of corporate credit cards to their European subsidiaries. While an economic downturn in Europe could have a negative impact on these customers’ revenues, it is unlikely that any effect on the overall credit-worthiness of these multinational corporations would be material to the Company.

The Company provides merchant processing and corporate trust services in Europe either directly or through banking affiliations in Europe. Operating cash for these businesses is deposited on a short-term basis with certain European banks. However, exposure is mitigated by the Company placing deposits at multiple banks and managing the amounts on deposit at any bank based on institution-specific deposit limits. At September 30, 2014, the Company had an aggregate amount on deposit with European banks of approximately $314 million.

The money market funds managed by a subsidiary of the Company do not have any investments in European sovereign debt, other than approximately $480 million at September 30, 2014 guaranteed by the country of Germany. Other than investments in banks in the countries of the Netherlands, France and Germany, those funds do not have any unsecured investments in banks domiciled in the Eurozone.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Off-balance sheet arrangements include any contractual arrangements to which an unconsolidated entity is a party, under which the Company has an obligation to provide credit or liquidity enhancements or market risk support. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into an array of commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and various forms of guarantees that may be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on these arrangements. The Company has not utilized private label asset securitizations as a source of funding. Off-balance sheet arrangements also include any obligation related to a variable interest held in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, credit enhancement or market risk support. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial

Statements for further information related to the Company’s interests in variable interest entities.

Capital Management The Company is committed to managing capital to maintain strong protection for depositors and creditors and for maximum shareholder benefit. The Company also manages its capital to exceed regulatory capital requirements for well-capitalized bank holding companies. Prior to 2014, the regulatory capital requirements effective for the Company followed the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“Basel I”). Beginning January 1, 2014, the regulatory capital requirements effective for the Company follow Basel III, subject to certain transition provisions from Basel I over the following four years to full implementation by January 1, 2018. Basel III includes two comprehensive methodologies for calculating risk-weighted assets: a general standardized approach and more risk-sensitive advanced approaches. As of April 1, 2014, the Company exited its parallel run qualification period, resulting in its capital adequacy now being evaluated against the Basel III methodology that is most restrictive. Table 9 provides a summary of statutory regulatory capital ratios in effect for the Company at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. All regulatory ratios exceeded regulatory “well-capitalized” requirements.

In September 2014, U.S. banking regulators approved a final regulatory Supplementary Leverage Ratio (“SLR”) requirement for banks calculating capital adequacy using advanced approaches under Basel III. The SLR is defined as tier 1 capital divided by total leverage exposure, which includes both on- and off-balance sheet exposures. The Company is required to calculate and report its SLR beginning in the first quarter 2015; however, the Company is not subject to the minimum SLR requirement until January 1, 2018. The Company believes it currently exceeds the applicable minimum SLR requirement.

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity was $43.1 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $41.1 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily the result of corporate earnings and changes in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities included in other comprehensive income, partially offset by dividends and common share repurchases.

The Company believes certain capital ratios in addition to statutory regulatory capital ratios are useful in evaluating its capital adequacy. The Company’s tangible common equity, as a percent of tangible assets and as a percent of risk-weighted assets calculated under the standardized approach, were 7.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively, at September 30, 2014, compared with 7.7 percent and 9.1 percent, respectively, at

U.S. Bancorp 27


Table of Contents
Table 9 Regulatory Capital Ratios

(Dollars in Millions) September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Basel III transitional standardized approach/Basel I:

Common equity tier 1 capital (a)

$ 30,213

Tier 1 capital

35,377 $ 33,386

Total risk-based capital

42,509 39,340

Risk-weighted assets

311,914 297,919

Common equity tier 1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets (a)

9.7 %

Tier 1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets

11.3 11.2 %

Tier 1 capital as a percent of adjusted quarterly average assets (leverage ratio)

9.4 9.6

Total risk-based capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets

13.6 13.2

Basel III transitional advanced approaches:

Common equity tier 1 capital (a)

$ 30,213

Tier 1 capital

35,377

Total risk-based capital

39,822

Risk-weighted assets

243,909

Common equity tier 1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets (a)

12.4 %

Tier 1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets

14.5

Total risk-based capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets

16.3

Note: September 30, 2014 amounts calculated under the Basel III transitional standardized and advanced approaches, with the Company being evaluated for capital adequacy against the approach that is most restrictive. December 31, 2013 amounts calculated under Basel I.
(a) Beginning January 1, 2014, the regulatory capital requirements effective for the Company include a common equity tier 1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets ratio.

December 31, 2013. The Company’s common equity tier 1 to risk-weighted assets ratio using the Basel III standardized approach as if fully implemented was 9.0 percent at September 30, 2014, compared with 8.8 percent at December 31, 2013. The Company’s common equity tier 1 to risk-weighted assets ratio using the Basel III advanced approaches as if fully implemented was 11.8 percent at September 30, 2014. Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further information regarding the calculation of these ratios.

On March 26, 2014, the Company announced its Board of Directors had approved a one-year authorization to repurchase up to $2.3 billion of its common stock, from April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of all shares purchased by the Company or any affiliated purchaser during the third quarter of 2014:

Period

(Dollars in Millions)

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased

Average

Price Paid

Per Share

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program (a)
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Program

July

7,896,817 (b) $ 42.46 7,746,817 $ 1,340

August

4,712,874 41.65 4,712,874 1,144

September

3,041,437 42.32 3,041,437 1,015

Total

15,651,128 (b) $ 42.19 15,501,128 $ 1,015

(a) All shares were purchased under the stock repurchase program announced on March 26, 2014.
(b) Includes 150,000 shares of common stock purchased, at an average price per share of $42.12, in open-market transactions by U.S. Bank National Association, the Company’s principal banking subsidiary, in its capacity as trustee of the Company’s Employee Retirement Savings Plan.

On June 17, 2014, the Company announced its Board of Directors had approved a 6.5 percent increase in the Company’s dividend rate per common share, from $.23 per quarter to $.245 per quarter.

Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis —Capital Management” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,  2013, for further discussion on capital management.

LINE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL REVIEW

The Company’s major lines of business are Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate, Consumer and Small Business Banking, Wealth Management and Securities Services, Payment Services, and Treasury and Corporate Support. These operating segments are components of the Company about which financial information is prepared and is evaluated regularly by management in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance.

Basis for Financial Presentation Business line results are derived from the Company’s business unit profitability reporting systems by specifically attributing managed balance sheet assets, deposits and other liabilities and their related income or expense. The allowance for credit losses and related provision expense are allocated to the lines of business based on the related loan balances managed. Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Line of Business Financial Review” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for further discussion on the business lines’ basis for financial presentation.

Designations, assignments and allocations change from time to time as management systems are enhanced, methods of evaluating performance or product lines change or business segments are realigned to better respond to the Company’s diverse customer base. During 2014, certain organization and methodology changes

28 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

were made and, accordingly, 2013 results were restated and presented on a comparable basis.

Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate offers lending, equipment finance and small-ticket leasing, depository services, treasury management, capital markets, international trade services and other financial services to middle market, large corporate, commercial real estate, financial institution, non-profit and public sector clients. Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate contributed $267 million of the Company’s net income in the third quarter and $827 million in the first nine months of 2014, or decreases of $57 million (17.6 percent) and $132 million (13.8 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. The decreases were primarily driven by higher provision for credit losses and lower net revenue.

Net revenue decreased $18 million (2.3 percent) in the third quarter and $61 million (2.6 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $12 million (2.4 percent) in the third quarter and $20 million (1.3 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases were primarily driven by increases in average loans and deposits, partially offset by lower rates and fees on loans. Noninterest income decreased $30 million (11.3 percent) in the third quarter and $81 million (9.9 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, driven by lower wholesale transaction activity and other loan-related fees, partially offset by increases in bond underwriting fees and commercial leasing revenue.

Noninterest expense was essentially flat in the third quarter and increased $7 million (.8 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, primarily due to increases in the FDIC insurance assessment allocation based on the level of commitments, offset by lower professional services expense and net shared services expense. The provision for credit losses increased $70 million in the third quarter and $140 million in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, due to higher net charge-offs and increases in the reserve allocation due to loan growth. Nonperforming assets were $264 million at September 30, 2014, $300 million at June 30, 2014, and $330 million at September 30, 2013. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of period-end loans were .33 percent at September 30, 2014, .38 percent at June 30, 2014, and .46 percent at September 30, 2013. Refer to the “Corporate Risk Profile” section for further information on factors impacting the credit quality of the loan portfolios.

Consumer and Small Business Banking Consumer and Small Business Banking delivers products and services through banking offices, telephone servicing and sales, on-line services, direct mail, ATM processing and mobile devices, such as mobile phones and tablet computers. It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, in-store banking, small business banking, consumer lending, workplace banking, student banking and 24-hour banking (collectively, the retail banking division), as well as mortgage banking. Consumer and Small Business Banking contributed $307 million of the Company’s net income in the third quarter and $907 million in the first nine months of 2014, or decreases of $66 million (17.7 percent) and $203 million (18.3 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. The decreases were due to lower net revenue and higher noninterest expense, partially offset by decreases in the provision for credit losses.

Within Consumer and Small Business Banking, the retail banking division contributed $170 million of the total net income in the third quarter and $509 million in the first nine months of 2014, or decreases of $48 million (22.0 percent) and $48 million (8.6 percent), respectively, from the same periods of 2013. Mortgage banking contributed $137 million and $398 million of Consumer and Small Business Banking’s net income in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively, or decreases of $18 million (11.6 percent) and $155 million (28.0 percent), respectively, from the same periods of 2013, reflecting lower mortgage banking activity in 2014.

U.S. Bancorp 29


Table of Contents
Table 10 Line of Business Financial Performance

Wholesale Banking and

Commercial Real Estate

Consumer and Small

Business Banking

Three Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in Millions)

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

Condensed Income Statement

Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis)

$ 518 $ 506 2.4 % $ 1,074 $ 1,153 (6.9 )%

Noninterest income

236 266 (11.3 ) 669 717 (6.7 )

Securities gains (losses), net

Total net revenue

754 772 (2.3 ) 1,743 1,870 (6.8 )

Noninterest expense

304 302 .7 1,169 1,110 5.3

Other intangibles

1 2 (50.0 ) 12 10 20.0

Total noninterest expense

305 304 .3 1,181 1,120 5.4

Income before provision and income taxes

449 468 (4.1 ) 562 750 (25.1 )

Provision for credit losses

29 (41 ) * 79 163 (51.5 )

Income before income taxes

420 509 (17.5 ) 483 587 (17.7 )

Income taxes and taxable-equivalent adjustment

153 185 (17.3 ) 176 214 (17.8 )

Net income

267 324 (17.6 ) 307 373 (17.7 )

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 267 $ 324 (17.6 ) $ 307 $ 373 (17.7 )

Average Balance Sheet

Commercial

$ 59,048 $ 51,302 15.1 % $ 9,439 $ 8,584 10.0 %

Commercial real estate

21,160 19,683 7.5 18,899 18,069 4.6

Residential mortgages

19 24 (20.8 ) 50,544 48,130 5.0

Credit card

Other retail

4 6 (33.3 ) 46,594 44,727 4.2

Total loans, excluding covered loans

80,231 71,015 13.0 125,476 119,510 5.0

Covered loans

174 340 (48.8 ) 5,688 6,434 (11.6 )

Total loans

80,405 71,355 12.7 131,164 125,944 4.1

Goodwill

1,648 1,604 2.7 3,680 3,515 4.7

Other intangible assets

21 24 (12.5 ) 2,664 2,650 .5

Assets

87,449 77,708 12.5 145,604 140,621 3.5

Noninterest-bearing deposits

32,684 30,812 6.1 24,696 22,585 9.3

Interest checking

11,270 10,031 12.4 36,881 33,007 11.7

Savings products

19,082 15,067 26.6 51,229 46,532 10.1

Time deposits

17,961 22,362 (19.7 ) 17,816 20,718 (14.0 )

Total deposits

80,997 78,272 3.5 130,622 122,842 6.3

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity

7,764 7,366 5.4 11,504 12,222 (5.9 )

Wholesale Banking and

Commercial Real Estate

Consumer and Small

Business Banking

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in Millions)

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

Condensed Income Statement

Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis)

$ 1,521 $ 1,501 1.3 % $ 3,241 $ 3,459 (6.3 )%

Noninterest income

738 819 (9.9 ) 1,967 2,268 (13.3 )

Securities gains (losses), net

Total net revenue

2,259 2,320 (2.6 ) 5,208 5,727 (9.1 )

Noninterest expense

930 920 1.1 3,421 3,377 1.3

Other intangibles

3 6 (50.0 ) 29 31 (6.5 )

Total noninterest expense

933 926 .8 3,450 3,408 1.2

Income before provision and income taxes

1,326 1,394 (4.9 ) 1,758 2,319 (24.2 )

Provision for credit losses

26 (114 ) * 332 573 (42.1 )

Income before income taxes

1,300 1,508 (13.8 ) 1,426 1,746 (18.3 )

Income taxes and taxable-equivalent adjustment

473 549 (13.8 ) 519 636 (18.4 )

Net income

827 959 (13.8 ) 907 1,110 (18.3 )

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 827 $ 959 (13.8 ) $ 907 $ 1,110 (18.3 )

Average Balance Sheet

Commercial

$ 57,029 $ 50,232 13.5 % $ 8,903 $ 8,567 3.9 %

Commercial real estate

20,879 19,375 7.8 18,771 17,741 5.8

Residential mortgages

20 27 (25.9 ) 50,443 46,251 9.1

Credit card

Other retail

4 7 (42.9 ) 45,964 44,739 2.7

Total loans, excluding covered loans

77,932 69,641 11.9 124,081 117,298 5.8

Covered loans

205 394 (48.0 ) 5,871 6,690 (12.2 )

Total loans

78,137 70,035 11.6 129,952 123,988 4.8

Goodwill

1,621 1,604 1.1 3,577 3,516 1.7

Other intangible assets

21 26 (19.2 ) 2,698 2,293 17.7

Assets

85,198 76,455 11.4 143,337 140,056 2.3

Noninterest-bearing deposits

32,029 30,299 5.7 23,218 21,976 5.7

Interest checking

11,042 10,378 6.4 35,832 32,841 9.1

Savings products

17,929 13,320 34.6 49,496 46,106 7.4

Time deposits

18,217 18,450 (1.3 ) 18,080 21,591 (16.3 )

Total deposits

79,217 72,447 9.3 126,626 122,514 3.4

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity

7,653 7,269 5.3 11,480 12,125 (5.3 )

* Not meaningful

30 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Wealth Management and

Securities Services

Payment

Services

Treasury and

Corporate Support

Consolidated

Company

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

$ 96 $ 82 17.1 % $ 442 $ 393 12.5 % $ 618 $ 580 6.6 % $ 2,748 $ 2,714 1.3 %
352 314 12.1 842 822 2.4 146 61 * 2,245 2,180 3.0
(3 ) (3 ) (3 ) (3 )
448 396 13.1 1,284 1,215 5.7 761 638 19.3 4,990 4,891 2.0
335 324 3.4 582 575 1.2 173 199 (13.1 ) 2,563 2,510 2.1
8 9 (11.1 ) 30 34 (11.8 ) 51 55 (7.3 )
343 333 3.0 612 609 .5 173 199 (13.1 ) 2,614 2,565 1.9
105 63 66.7 672 606 10.9 588 439 33.9 2,376 2,326 2.1
6 6 190 172 10.5 7 (2 ) * 311 298 4.4
99 57 73.7 482 434 11.1 581 441 31.7 2,065 2,028 1.8
36 21 71.4 175 158 10.8 39 20 95.0 579 598 (3.2 )
63 36 75.0 307 276 11.2 542 421 28.7 1,486 1,430 3.9
(9 ) (10 ) 10.0 (6 ) 48 * (15 ) 38 *
$ 63 $ 36 75.0 $ 298 $ 266 12.0 $ 536 $ 469 14.3 $ 1,471 $ 1,468 .2
$ 1,968 $ 1,772 11.1 % $ 6,681 $ 6,191 7.9 % $ 209 $ 215 (2.8 )% $ 77,345 $ 68,064 13.6 %
601 655 (8.2 ) 179 94 90.4 40,839 38,501 6.1
1,430 984 45.3 1 1 51,994 49,139 5.8
17,753 16,931 4.9 17,753 16,931 4.9
1,436 1,532 (6.3 ) 664 729 (8.9 ) 48,698 46,994 3.6
5,435 4,943 10.0 25,098 23,851 5.2 389 310 25.5 236,629 219,629 7.7
3 17 (82.4 ) 5 5 1,368 2,937 (53.4 ) 7,238 9,733 (25.6 )
5,438 4,960 9.6 25,103 23,856 5.2 1,757 3,247 (45.9 ) 243,867 229,362 6.3
1,572 1,533 2.5 2,517 2,509 .3 9,417 9,161 2.8
155 166 (6.6 ) 483 557 (13.3 ) 2 * 3,323 3,399 (2.2 )
8,679 7,751 12.0 31,407 30,123 4.3 112,684 95,958 17.4 385,823 352,161 9.6
14,900 13,500 10.4 702 714 (1.7 ) 1,144 653 75.2 74,126 68,264 8.6
5,729 4,741 20.8 573 455 25.9 1 1 54,454 48,235 12.9
30,373 26,326 15.4 81 60 35.0 100 80 25.0 100,865 88,065 14.5
3,939 4,182 (5.8 ) 1,847 542 * 41,563 47,804 (13.1 )
54,941 48,749 12.7 1,356 1,229 10.3 3,092 1,276 * 271,008 252,368 7.4
2,267 2,398 (5.5 ) 5,690 6,102 (6.8 ) 15,907 11,848 34.3 43,132 39,936 8.0

Wealth Management and

Securities Services

Payment

Services

Treasury and

Corporate Support

Consolidated

Company

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

2014 2013

Percent

Change

$ 270 $ 257 5.1 % $ 1,271 $ 1,168 8.8 % $ 1,895 $ 1,710 10.8 % $ 8,198 $ 8,095 1.3 %
1,038 935 11.0 2,449 2,397 2.2 600 191 * 6,792 6,610 2.8
2 8 (75.0 ) 2 8 (75.0 )
1,308 1,192 9.7 3,720 3,565 4.3 2,497 1,909 30.8 14,992 14,713 1.9
1,002 968 3.5 1,742 1,695 2.8 668 465 43.7 7,763 7,425 4.6
25 27 (7.4 ) 91 103 (11.7 ) 148 167 (11.4 )
1,027 995 3.2 1,833 1,798 1.9 668 465 43.7 7,911 7,592 4.2
281 197 42.6 1,887 1,767 6.8 1,829 1,444 26.7 7,081 7,121 (.6 )
8 7 14.3 573 553 3.6 2 44 (95.5 ) 941 1,063 (11.5 )
273 190 43.7 1,314 1,214 8.2 1,827 1,400 30.5 6,140 6,058 1.4
100 69 44.9 478 442 8.1 163 101 61.4 1,733 1,797 (3.6 )
173 121 43.0 836 772 8.3 1,664 1,299 28.1 4,407 4,261 3.4
(27 ) (29 ) 6.9 (17 ) 148 * (44 ) 119 *
$ 173 $ 121 43.0 $ 809 $ 743 8.9 $ 1,647 $ 1,447 13.8 $ 4,363 $ 4,380 (.4 )
$ 1,910 $ 1,686 13.3 % $ 6,402 $ 6,030 6.2 % $ 180 $ 204 (11.8 )% $ 74,424 $ 66,719 11.5 %
608 656 (7.3 ) 207 100 * 40,465 37,872 6.8
1,335 776 72.0 1 1 51,799 47,055 10.1
17,516 16,627 5.3 17,516 16,627 5.3
1,450 1,544 (6.1 ) 680 744 (8.6 ) 48,098 47,034 2.3
5,303 4,662 13.7 24,598 23,401 5.1 388 305 27.2 232,302 215,307 7.9
5 14 (64.3 ) 5 5 1,710 3,272 (47.7 ) 7,796 10,375 (24.9 )
5,308 4,676 13.5 24,603 23,406 5.1 2,098 3,577 (41.3 ) 240,098 225,682 6.4
1,568 1,529 2.6 2,518 2,508 .4 9,284 9,157 1.4
163 174 (6.3 ) 494 584 (15.4 ) 2 * 3,376 3,079 9.6
8,409 7,514 11.9 30,901 29,659 4.2 107,202 97,364 10.1 375,047 351,048 6.8
15,095 13,786 9.5 704 694 1.4 1,228 428 * 72,274 67,183 7.6
5,494 4,683 17.3 559 444 25.9 1 1 52,928 48,347 9.5
28,650 27,070 5.8 76 54 40.7 103 85 21.2 96,254 86,635 11.1
4,111 5,237 (21.5 ) 1,798 841 * 42,206 46,119 (8.5 )
53,350 50,776 5.1 1,339 1,192 12.3 3,130 1,355 * 263,662 248,284 6.2
2,283 2,375 (3.9 ) 5,675 6,033 (5.9 ) 15,407 11,873 29.8 42,498 39,675 7.1

U.S. Bancorp 31


Table of Contents

Net revenue decreased $127 million (6.8 percent) in the third quarter and $519 million (9.1 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, decreased $79 million (6.9 percent) in the third quarter and $218 million (6.3 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. The decreases in net interest income were primarily due to lower loan fees due to the wind down of the CAA product, lower rates on loans, and the impact of lower rates on the margin benefit from deposits, partially offset by higher average loan and deposit balances. Noninterest income decreased $48 million (6.7 percent) in the third quarter and $301 million (13.3 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, primarily the result of lower mortgage banking revenue, partially offset by higher deposit service charges and retail lease revenue. The decrease in mortgage banking revenue in the third quarter of 2014, compared with the third quarter of 2013, was principally due to an unfavorable change in the valuation of MSRs, net of hedging activities. The decrease in mortgage banking revenue in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same period of the prior year, was primarily due to lower origination and sales revenue.

Noninterest expense increased $61 million (5.4 percent) in the third quarter and $42 million (1.2 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, the result of mortgage servicing-related expenses and higher compensation and employee benefits expense, partially offset by lower mortgage-related incentive compensation, due to lower mortgage portfolio production, and lower FDIC insurance assessments. The provision for credit losses decreased $84 million (51.5 percent) in the third quarter and $241 million (42.1 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. The decreases were due to lower net charge-offs and favorable changes in the reserve allocation, partially offset by higher loan balances. As a percentage of average loans outstanding on an annualized basis, net charge-offs decreased to .35 percent in the third quarter of 2014, compared with .51 percent in the third quarter of 2013. Nonperforming assets were $1.4 billion at September 30, 2014, $1.4 billion at June 30, 2014, and $1.5 billion at September 30, 2013. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of period-end loans were 1.10 percent at September 30, 2014, 1.08 percent at June 30, 2014, and 1.15 percent at September 30, 2013. Refer to the “Corporate Risk Profile” section for further information on factors impacting the credit quality of the loan portfolios.

Wealth Management and Securities Services Wealth Management and Securities Services provides private banking, financial advisory services, investment management, retail brokerage services, insurance, trust, custody and fund servicing through five businesses: Wealth Management, Corporate Trust Services, U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Institutional Trust & Custody and Fund Services. Wealth Management and Securities Services contributed $63 million of the Company’s net income in the third quarter and $173 million in the first nine months of 2014, or increases of $27 million (75.0 percent) and $52 million (43.0 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases were primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.

Net revenue increased $52 million (13.1 percent) in the third quarter and $116 million (9.7 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases were primarily driven by higher noninterest income of $38 million (12.1 percent) in the third quarter and $103 million (11.0 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, reflecting the impact of account growth, improved market conditions and business expansion. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $14 million (17.1 percent) in the third quarter and $13 million (5.1 percent) in the first nine months 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, principally due to higher average loan and deposit balances and an increase in the margin benefit of corporate trust deposits.

Noninterest expense increased $10 million (3.0 percent) in the third quarter and $32 million (3.2 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases in noninterest expense were primarily due to higher compensation and employee benefits expense, including the impact of business expansion, partially offset by lower net shared services expense.

Payment Services Payment Services includes consumer and business credit cards, stored-value cards, debit cards, corporate, government and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit and merchant processing. Payment Services contributed $298 million of the Company’s net income in the third quarter and $809 million in the first nine months of 2014, or increases of $32 million (12.0 percent) and $66 million (8.9 percent), respectively, compared with the same periods of 2013. The increases were primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense and provision for credit losses.

32 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Net revenue increased $69 million (5.7 percent) in the third quarter and $155 million (4.3 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $49 million (12.5 percent) in the third quarter and $103 million (8.8 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, driven by higher average loan balances, higher loan-related fees and improved loan rates. Noninterest income increased $20 million (2.4 percent) in the third quarter and $52 million (2.2 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, primarily due to increases in credit and debit card revenue on higher transaction volumes, and higher merchant processing services revenue due to higher volumes and increases in fee-based product revenue, partially offset by lower rates.

Noninterest expense increased $3 million (.5 percent) in the third quarter and $35 million (1.9 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, primarily due to higher compensation and employee benefits expenses, including the impact of business initiatives, partially offset by reductions in technology and communications expense and other intangibles expense. The provision for credit losses increased $18 million (10.5 percent) in the third quarter and $20 million (3.6 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, primarily due to unfavorable changes in the reserve allocation. As a percentage of average loans outstanding, net charge-offs were 2.94 percent in the third quarter of 2014, compared with 3.16 percent in the third quarter of 2013.

Treasury and Corporate Support Treasury and Corporate Support includes the Company’s investment portfolios, most covered commercial and commercial real estate loans and related other real estate owned, funding, capital management, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances, income taxes not allocated to business lines, including most investments in tax-advantaged projects, and the residual aggregate of those expenses associated with corporate activities that are managed on a consolidated basis. Treasury and Corporate Support recorded net income of $536 million in the third quarter and $1.6 billion in the first nine months of 2014, compared with $469 million and $1.4 billion in the same periods of 2013, respectively.

Net revenue increased $123 million (19.3 percent) in the third quarter and $588 million (30.8 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $38 million (6.6 percent) in the third quarter and $185 million (10.8 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, principally due to increases in average balances in the investment securities portfolio and lower rates on short-term borrowings, partially offset by lower income from the run-off of acquired assets. Noninterest income increased $85 million in the third quarter and $403 million in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same periods of 2013, primarily due to higher equity investment income and commercial products revenue. In addition, noninterest income was higher in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the same period of the prior year, due to the second quarter 2014 Visa sale.

Noninterest expense decreased $26 million (13.1 percent) in the third quarter of 2014, compared with the third quarter of 2013, principally due to a decrease in employee benefits expense resulting from lower pension costs, and lower costs related to investments in tax-advantaged projects related to a change in the first quarter of 2014 accounting for affordable housing investments, partially offset by increased compensation expense. Noninterest expense increased $203 million (43.7 percent) in the first nine months of 2014, compared with the first nine months of 2013, principally driven by the second quarter 2014 FHA DOJ settlement, insurance-related recoveries in the prior year and increased compensation expense, partially offset by decreases in employee benefits expense and lower costs related to investments in tax-advantaged projects.

Income taxes are assessed to each line of business at a managerial tax rate of 36.4 percent with the residual tax expense or benefit to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate included in Treasury and Corporate Support.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

In addition to capital ratios defined by banking regulators, the Company considers various other measures when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy, including:

Tangible common equity to tangible assets,

Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets,

Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented standardized approach,

Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented advanced approaches, and for additional information,

Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets using Basel I definition.

U.S. Bancorp 33


Table of Contents

These measures are viewed by management as useful additional methods of reflecting the level of capital available to withstand unexpected market or economic conditions. Additionally, presentation of these measures allows investors, analysts and banking regulators to assess the Company’s capital position relative to other financial services companies. These measures differ from currently effective capital ratios defined by banking regulations principally in that the numerator includes unrealized gains and losses related to available-for-sale securities and excludes preferred securities, including preferred stock, the nature and extent of which varies among different financial services companies. These measures are not defined in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), or are not currently effective or defined in federal banking regulations. As a result, these measures disclosed by the Company may be considered non-GAAP financial measures.

There may be limits in the usefulness of these measures to investors. As a result, the Company encourages readers to consider the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this report in their entirety, and not to rely on any single financial measure.

The following table shows the Company’s calculation of these Non-GAAP financial measures:

(Dollars in Millions) September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013

Total equity

$ 43,829 $ 41,807

Preferred stock

(4,756 ) (4,756 )

Noncontrolling interests

(688 ) (694 )

Goodwill (net of deferred tax liability) (1)

(8,503 ) (8,343 )

Intangible assets, other than mortgage servicing rights

(877 ) (849 )

Tangible common equity (a)

29,005 27,165

Tangible common equity (as calculated above)

29,005 27,165

Adjustments (2)

187 224

Common equity tier 1 capital estimated for the Basel III fully implemented standardized and advanced approaches (b)

29,192 27,389

Tier 1 capital, determined in accordance with prescribed regulatory requirements using Basel I definition

33,386

Preferred stock

(4,756 )

Noncontrolling interests, less preferred stock not eligible for Tier 1 capital

(688 )

Tier 1 common equity using Basel 1 definition (c)

27,942

Total assets

391,284 364,021

Goodwill (net of deferred tax liability) (1)

(8,503 ) (8,343 )

Intangible assets, other than mortgage servicing rights

(877 ) (849 )

Tangible assets (d)

381,904 354,829

Risk-weighted assets, determined in accordance with prescribed regulatory requirements (3)(e)

311,914 297,919

Adjustments (4)

12,837 13,712

Risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented standardized approach (f)

324,751 311,631

Risk-weighted assets, determined in accordance with prescribed transitional advanced approaches regulatory requirements

243,909

Adjustments (5)

3,443

Risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented advanced approaches (g)

247,352

Ratios

Tangible common equity to tangible assets (a)/(d)

7.6 % 7.7 %

Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets (a)/(e)

9.3 9.1

Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets using Basel I definition (c)/(e)

9.4

Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented standardized approach (b)/(f)

9.0 8.8

Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets estimated for the Basel III fully implemented advanced approaches (b)/(g)

11.8

(1) Includes goodwill related to certain investments in unconsolidated financial institutions per prescribed regulatory requirements beginning March 31, 2014.
(2) Includes net losses on cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive income and other adjustments.
(3) September 30, 2014, calculated under the Basel III transitional standardized approach; December 31, 2013, calculated under Basel I.
(4) Includes higher risk-weighting for unfunded loan commitments, investment securities, residential mortgages, mortgage servicing rights and other adjustments.
(5) Primarily reflects higher risk-weighting for mortgage servicing rights.

34 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The Company’s financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding the Company’s financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those policies management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Those policies considered to be critical accounting policies relate to the allowance for credit losses, fair value estimates, purchased loans and related indemnification assets, MSRs, goodwill and other intangibles and income taxes. Management has discussed the development and the selection of critical accounting policies with the Company’s Audit Committee. These accounting policies are discussed in detail in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Critical Accounting Policies” and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December  31, 2013.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there was no change made in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

U.S. Bancorp 35


Table of Contents

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Balance Sheet

(Dollars in Millions)

September 30,

2014

December 31,

2013

(Unaudited)

Assets

Cash and due from banks

$ 6,183 $ 8,477

Investment securities

Held-to-maturity (fair value $44,094 and $38,368, respectively; including $366 and $994 at fair value pledged as collateral, respectively) (a)

44,231 38,920

Available-for-sale ($274 and $1,106 pledged as collateral, respectively) (a)

52,674 40,935

Loans held for sale (including $3,918 and $3,263 of mortgage loans carried at fair value, respectively)

3,939 3,268

Loans

Commercial

78,878 70,033

Commercial real estate

40,909 39,885

Residential mortgages

51,957 51,156

Credit card

17,858 18,021

Other retail

48,935 47,678

Total loans, excluding covered loans

238,537 226,773

Covered loans

7,054 8,462

Total loans

245,591 235,235

Less allowance for loan losses

(4,065 ) (4,250 )

Net loans

241,526 230,985

Premises and equipment

2,608 2,606

Goodwill

9,401 9,205

Other intangible assets

3,338 3,529

Other assets (including $142 and $111 of trading securities at fair value pledged as collateral, respectively) (a)

27,384 26,096

Total assets

$ 391,284 $ 364,021

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Deposits

Noninterest-bearing

$ 78,641 $ 76,941

Interest-bearing

165,070 156,165

Time deposits greater than $100,000

29,386 29,017

Total deposits

273,097 262,123

Short-term borrowings

30,045 27,608

Long-term debt

30,768 20,049

Other liabilities

13,545 12,434

Total liabilities

347,455 322,214

Shareholders’ equity

Preferred stock

4,756 4,756

Common stock, par value $0.01 a share – authorized: 4,000,000,000 shares; issued: 9/30/14 and 12/31/13 – 2,125,725,742 shares

21 21

Capital surplus

8,293 8,216

Retained earnings

41,543 38,667

Less cost of common stock in treasury: 9/30/14 – 330,882,734 shares; 12/31/13 – 300,977,274 shares

(10,836 ) (9,476 )

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(636 ) (1,071 )

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity

43,141 41,113

Noncontrolling interests

688 694

Total equity

43,829 41,807

Total liabilities and equity

$ 391,284 $ 364,021

(a) Includes only collateral pledged by the Company where counterparties have the right to sell or pledge the collateral.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

36 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Statement of Income

Three Months Ended

September 30,

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Interest Income

Loans

$ 2,518 $ 2,568 $ 7,572 $ 7,682

Loans held for sale

36 46 87 172

Investment securities

476 420 1,378 1,222

Other interest income

27 34 89 141

Total interest income

3,057 3,068 9,126 9,217

Interest Expense

Deposits

115 134 348 433

Short-term borrowings

72 98 204 270

Long-term debt

178 178 543 587

Total interest expense

365 410 1,095 1,290

Net interest income

2,692 2,658 8,031 7,927

Provision for credit losses

311 298 941 1,063

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

2,381 2,360 7,090 6,864

Noninterest Income

Credit and debit card revenue

251 244 749 702

Corporate payment products revenue

195 192 550 540

Merchant processing services

387 371 1,127 1,091

ATM processing services

81 83 241 248

Trust and investment management fees

315 280 930 842

Deposit service charges

185 180 513 493

Treasury management fees

136 134 409 408

Commercial products revenue

209 207 635 616

Mortgage banking revenue

260 328 774 1,125

Investment products fees

49 46 142 133

Securities gains (losses), net

Realized gains (losses), net

8 21

Total other-than-temporary impairment

(3 ) (2 ) (5 ) (5 )

Portion of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income

(1 ) (1 ) (8 )

Total securities gains (losses), net

(3 ) (3 ) 2 8

Other

177 115 722 412

Total noninterest income

2,242 2,177 6,794 6,618

Noninterest Expense

Compensation

1,132 1,088 3,372 3,268

Employee benefits

250 278 796 865

Net occupancy and equipment

249 240 739 709

Professional services

102 94 282 263

Marketing and business development

78 85 253 254

Technology and communications

219 214 644 639

Postage, printing and supplies

81 76 242 230

Other intangibles

51 55 148 167

Other

452 435 1,435 1,197

Total noninterest expense

2,614 2,565 7,911 7,592

Income before income taxes

2,009 1,972 5,973 5,890

Applicable income taxes

523 542 1,566 1,629

Net income

1,486 1,430 4,407 4,261

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

(15 ) 38 (44 ) 119

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 1,471 $ 1,468 $ 4,363 $ 4,380

Net income applicable to U.S. Bancorp common shareholders

$ 1,405 $ 1,400 $ 4,163 $ 4,163

Earnings per common share

$ .78 $ .76 $ 2.30 $ 2.26

Diluted earnings per common share

$ .78 $ .76 $ 2.29 $ 2.25

Dividends declared per common share

$ .245 $ .230 $ .720 $ .655

Average common shares outstanding

1,798 1,832 1,809 1,844

Average diluted common shares outstanding

1,807 1,843 1,819 1,854

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

U.S. Bancorp 37


Table of Contents

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(Dollars in Millions)

(Unaudited)

2014 2013 2014 2013

Net income

$ 1,486 $ 1,430 $ 4,407 $ 4,261

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale

(21 ) (237 ) 486 (1,032 )

Other-than-temporary impairment not recognized in earnings on securities available-for-sale

1 1 8

Changes in unrealized gains and losses on derivative hedges

16 (17 ) (19 ) 33

Foreign currency translation

4 13 18 (20 )

Changes in unrealized gains and losses on retirement plans

38 37

Reclassification to earnings of realized gains and losses

76 99 221 270

Income taxes related to other comprehensive income

(29 ) 40 (272 ) 276

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

46 (63 ) 435 (428 )

Comprehensive income

1,532 1,367 4,842 3,833

Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

(15 ) 38 (44 ) 119

Comprehensive income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 1,517 $ 1,405 $ 4,798 $ 3,952

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

38 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity

U.S. Bancorp Shareholders

(Dollars and Shares in Millions)

(Unaudited)

Common Shares

Outstanding

Preferred

Stock

Common

Stock

Capital

Surplus

Retained

Earnings

Treasury

Stock

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

Total

U.S. Bancorp

Shareholders’

Equity

Noncontrolling

Interests

Total

Equity

Balance December 31, 2012

1,869 $ 4,769 $ 21 $ 8,201 $ 34,720 $ (7,790 ) $ (923 ) $ 38,998 $ 1,269 $ 40,267

Net income (loss)

4,380 4,380 (119 ) 4,261

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(428 ) (428 ) (428 )

Redemption of preferred stock

(500 ) 8 (8 ) (500 ) (500 )

Preferred stock dividends

(189 ) (189 ) (189 )

Common stock dividends

(1,211 ) (1,211 ) (1,211 )

Issuance of preferred stock

487 487 487

Issuance of common and treasury stock

15 (114 ) 459 345 345

Purchase of treasury stock

(52 ) (1,843 ) (1,843 ) (1,843 )

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(45 ) (45 )

Net other changes in noncontrolling interests

315 315

Stock option and restricted stock grants

93 93 93

Balance September 30, 2013

1,832 $ 4,756 $ 21 $ 8,188 $ 37,692 $ (9,174 ) $ (1,351 ) $ 40,132 $ 1,420 $ 41,552

Balance December 31, 2013

1,825 $ 4,756 $ 21 $ 8,216 $ 38,667 $ (9,476 ) $ (1,071 ) $ 41,113 $ 694 $ 41,807

Net income (loss)

4,363 4,363 44 4,407

Other comprehensive income (loss)

435 435 435

Preferred stock dividends

(181 ) (181 ) (181 )

Common stock dividends

(1,306 ) (1,306 ) (1,306 )

Issuance of common and treasury stock

13 (10 ) 407 397 397

Purchase of treasury stock

(43 ) (1,767 ) (1,767 ) (1,767 )

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(44 ) (44 )

Net other changes in noncontrolling interests

(6 ) (6 )

Stock option and restricted stock grants

87 87 87

Balance September 30, 2014

1,795 $ 4,756 $ 21 $ 8,293 $ 41,543 $ (10,836 ) $ (636 ) $ 43,141 $ 688 $ 43,829

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

U.S. Bancorp 39


Table of Contents

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(Dollars in Millions)

(Unaudited)

2014 2013

Operating Activities

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 4,363 $ 4,380

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

Provision for credit losses

941 1,063

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

225 222

Amortization of intangibles

148 167

Provision for deferred income taxes

(36 ) (38 )

(Gain) loss on sale of loans held for sale

(565 ) (864 )

(Gain) loss on sale of securities and other assets

(383 ) (42 )

Loans originated for sale in the secondary market, net of repayments

(21,374 ) (49,411 )

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale

21,160 53,845

Other, net

(13 ) (665 )

Net cash provided by operating activities

4,466 8,657

Investing Activities

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investment securities

401 766

Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity investment securities

7,215 6,854

Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investment securities

4,944 8,395

Purchases of held-to-maturity investment securities

(12,571 ) (9,439 )

Purchases of available-for-sale investment securities

(16,627 ) (9,381 )

Net increase in loans outstanding

(10,043 ) (8,495 )

Proceeds from sales of loans

1,165 620

Purchases of loans

(1,703 ) (1,883 )

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

3,436

Other, net

411 (100 )

Net cash used in investing activities

(23,372 ) (12,663 )

Financing Activities

Net increase in deposits

6,186 12,533

Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings

2,437 (174 )

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

12,978 198

Principal payments or redemption of long-term debt

(2,196 ) (2,380 )

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock

487

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

377 331

Redemption of preferred stock

(500 )

Repurchase of common stock

(1,704 ) (1,779 )

Cash dividends paid on preferred stock

(181 ) (193 )

Cash dividends paid on common stock

(1,285 ) (1,154 )

Net cash provided by financing activities

16,612 7,369

Change in cash and due from banks

(2,294 ) 3,363

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

8,477 8,252

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 6,183 $ 11,615

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

40 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flow activity required in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In the opinion of management of U.S. Bancorp (the “Company”), all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods have been made. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Accounting policies for the lines of business are generally the same as those used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements with respect to activities specifically attributable to each business line. However, the preparation of business line results requires management to establish methodologies to allocate funding costs, expenses and other financial elements to each line of business. Table 10 “Line of Business Financial Performance” included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis provides details of segment results. This information is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 2 Accounting Changes

Revenue Recognition In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued accounting guidance, effective for the Company on January 1, 2017, related to revenue recognition from contracts with customers, which amends certain currently existing revenue recognition accounting guidance. The guidance allows for either retrospective application to all periods presented or a modified retrospective approach where the guidance would only be applied to existing contracts in effect at the adoption date and new contracts going forward. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance under the modified retrospective approach and expects the adoption will not be material to its financial statements.

Note 3 Business Combinations

In June 2014, the Company acquired the Chicago-area branch banking operations of the Charter One Bank franchise (“Charter One”) owned by RBS Citizens Financial Group. The acquisition included Charter One’s retail branch network, small business operations and select middle market relationships. The Company acquired approximately $969 million of loans and $4.8 billion of deposits with this transaction.

U.S. Bancorp 41


Table of Contents
Note 4 Investment Securities

The amortized cost, other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities were as follows:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Unrealized Losses Unrealized Losses
(Dollars in Millions) Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Other-than-
Temporary (e)
Other (f) Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Other-than-
Temporary (e)
Other (f) Fair
Value

Held-to-maturity (a)

U.S. Treasury and agencies

$ 2,679 $ 8 $ $ (40 ) $ 2,647 $ 3,114 $ 5 $ $ (79 ) $ 3,040

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential

Agency

41,419 244 (358 ) 41,305 35,671 187 (665 ) 35,193

Non-agency non-prime (d)

1 1 1 1

Asset-backed securities

Collateralized debt obligations/Collateralized loan obligations

8 8 9 9

Other

14 4 (1 ) 17 16 4 (1 ) (1 ) 18

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

10 10 12 12

Obligations of foreign governments

9 9 7 7

Other debt securities

99 (2 ) 97 99 (11 ) 88

Total held-to-maturity

$ 44,231 $ 264 $ (1 ) $ (400 ) $ 44,094 $ 38,920 $ 205 $ (1 ) $ (756 ) $ 38,368

Available-for-sale (b)

U.S. Treasury and agencies

$ 2,692 $ 7 $ $ (21 ) $ 2,678 $ 1,108 $ 4 $ $ (67 ) $ 1,045

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential

Agency

41,734 524 (421 ) 41,837 31,633 449 (529 ) 31,553

Non-agency

Prime (c)

420 11 (4 ) (1 ) 426 486 4 (8 ) (4 ) 478

Non-prime (d)

270 15 (1 ) 284 297 5 (5 ) 297

Commercial agency

119 3 122 148 4 152

Asset-backed securities

Collateralized debt obligations/Collateralized loan obligations

19 4 23 20 4 24

Other

609 13 622 616 13 629

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

5,327 239 (3 ) 5,563 5,673 116 (51 ) 5,738

Obligations of foreign governments

6 6 6 6

Corporate debt securities

690 3 (54 ) 639 734 (94 ) 640

Perpetual preferred securities

201 27 (8 ) 220 205 24 (17 ) 212

Other investments

227 27 254 133 28 161

Total available-for-sale

$ 52,314 $ 873 $ (5 ) $ (508 ) $ 52,674 $ 41,059 $ 651 $ (13 ) $ (762 ) $ 40,935

(a) Held-to-maturity investment securities are carried at historical cost or at fair value at the time of transfer from the available-for-sale to held-to-maturity category, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts and credit-related other-than-temporary impairment.
(b) Available-for-sale investment securities are carried at fair value with unrealized net gains or losses reported within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity.
(c) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads). When the Company determines the designation, prime securities typically have a weighted average credit score of 725 or higher and a loan-to-value of 80 percent or lower; however, other pool characteristics may result in designations that deviate from these credit score and loan-to-value thresholds.
(d) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.
(e) Represents impairment not related to credit for those investment securities that have been determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
(f) Represents unrealized losses on investment securities that have not been determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

The weighted-average maturity of the available-for-sale investment securities was 4.9 years at September 30, 2014, compared with 6.0 years at December 31, 2013. The corresponding weighted-average yields were 2.35 percent and 2.64 percent, respectively. The weighted-average maturity of the held-to-maturity investment securities was 4.4 years at September 30, 2014, compared with 4.5 years at December 31, 2013. The corresponding weighted-average yields were 1.93 percent and 2.00 percent, respectively.

For amortized cost, fair value and yield by maturity date of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities outstanding at September 30, 2014, refer to Table 4 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

42 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Investment securities with a fair value of $12.9 billion at September 30, 2014, and $17.3 billion at December 31, 2013, were pledged to secure public, private and trust deposits, repurchase agreements and for other purposes required by contractual obligation or law. Included in these amounts were securities where the Company and certain counterparties have agreements granting the counterparties the right to sell or pledge the securities. Investment securities delivered under these types of arrangements had a fair value of $640 million at September 30, 2014, and $2.1 billion at December 31, 2013.

The following table provides information about the amount of interest income from taxable and non-taxable investment securities:

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Taxable

$ 419 $ 357 $ 1,203 $ 1,029

Non-taxable

57 63 175 193

Total interest income from investment securities

$ 476 $ 420 $ 1,378 $ 1,222

The following table provides information about the amount of gross gains and losses realized through the sales of available-for-sale investment securities:

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Realized gains

$ $ $ 8 $ 21

Realized losses

Net realized gains (losses)

$ $ $ 8 $ 21

Income tax (benefit) on net realized gains (losses)

$ $ $ 3 $ 8

The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment securities with unrealized losses to determine whether investment securities are other-than-temporarily impaired considering, among other factors, the nature of the investment securities, credit ratings or financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, expected cash flows of underlying collateral, the existence of any government or agency guarantees, market conditions and whether the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investment securities.

The following tables summarize other-than-temporary impairment by investment category:

2014 2013

Three Months Ended September 30
(Dollars in Millions)

Losses
Recorded
in Earnings
Other Gains
(Losses) (c)
Total Losses
Recorded in
Earnings
Other Gains
(Losses) (c)
Total

Available-for-sale

Mortgage-backed securities

Non-agency residential

Prime (a)

$ $ $ $ (1 ) $ $ (1 )

Non-prime (b)

(2 ) 1 (1 )

Perpetual preferred securities

(3 ) (3 )

Total available-for-sale

$ (3 ) $ $ (3 ) $ (3 ) $ 1 $ (2 )

(a) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads).
(b) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.
(c) Losses represent the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) for investment securities determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired during the period. Gains represent recoveries in the fair value of securities that had non-credit other-than-temporary impairment during the period.

U.S. Bancorp

43


Table of Contents
2014 2013

Nine Months Ended September 30
(Dollars in Millions)

Losses
Recorded
in Earnings
Other Gains
(Losses) (c)
Total Losses
Recorded in
Earnings
Other Gains
(Losses) (c)
Total

Available-for-sale

Mortgage-backed securities

Prime (a)

$ (1 ) $ 1 $ $ (5 ) $ 2 $ (3 )

Non-prime (b)

(2 ) (2 ) (8 ) 6 (2 )

Perpetual preferred securities

(3 ) (3 )

Total available-for-sale

$ (6 ) $ 1 $ (5 ) $ (13 ) $ 8 $ (5 )

(a) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads).
(b) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.
(c) Losses represent the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) for investment securities determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired during the period. Gains represent recoveries in the fair value of securities that had non-credit other-than-temporary impairment during the period.

The Company determined the other-than-temporary impairment recorded in earnings for debt securities not intended to be sold by estimating the future cash flows of each individual investment security, using market information where available, and discounting the cash flows at the original effective rate of the investment security. Other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) was measured as the difference between that discounted amount and the fair value of each investment security. For perpetual preferred securities determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company recorded a loss in earnings for the entire difference between the securities’ fair value and their amortized cost.

The following table includes the ranges for significant assumptions used for those available-for-sale non-agency mortgage-backed securities determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired during the three months ended September 30, 2014:

Non-Prime (a)
Minimum Maximum Average

Estimated lifetime prepayment rates

8 % 10 % 8 %

Lifetime probability of default rates

6 8 8

Lifetime loss severity rates

40 55 42

(a) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.

Changes in the credit losses on debt securities (excluding perpetual preferred securities) are summarized as follows:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 111 $ 124 $ 116 $ 134

Additions to Credit Losses Due to Other-than-temporary Impairments

Decreases in expected cash flows on securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized

3 3 13

Total other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities

3 3 13

Other Changes in Credit Losses

Increases in expected cash flows

(2 ) (1 ) (4 ) (2 )

Realized losses (a)

(4 ) (4 ) (10 ) (18 )

Credit losses on security sales and securities expected to be sold

(5 )

Balance at end of period

$ 105 $ 122 $ 105 $ 122

(a) Primarily represents principal losses allocated to mortgage and asset-backed securities in the Company’s portfolio under the terms of the securitization transaction documents.

44 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2014, certain investment securities had a fair value below amortized cost. The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investment securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual investment securities have been in continuous unrealized loss positions, at September 30, 2014:

Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
(Dollars in Millions)

Fair

Value

Unrealized
Losses

Fair

Value

Unrealized
Losses

Fair

Value

Unrealized
Losses

Held-to-maturity

U.S. Treasury and agencies

$ 577 $ (2 ) $ 968 $ (38 ) $ 1,545 $ (40 )

Residential agency mortgage-backed securities

11,469 (76 ) 9,607 (282 ) 21,076 (358 )

Other asset-backed securities

6 (1 ) 6 (1 )

Other debt securities

22 (2 ) 22 (2 )

Total held-to-maturity

$ 12,046 $ (78 ) $ 10,603 $ (323 ) $ 22,649 $ (401 )

Available-for-sale

U.S. Treasury and agencies

$ 1,173 $ (1 ) $ 825 $ (20 ) $ 1,998 $ (21 )

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential

Agency

9,519 (91 ) 8,317 (330 ) 17,836 (421 )

Non-agency (a)

Prime (b)

40 (1 ) 114 (4 ) 154 (5 )

Non-prime (c)

12 22 (1 ) 34 (1 )

Other asset-backed securities

2 24 26

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

15 217 (3 ) 232 (3 )

Obligations of foreign governments

6 6

Corporate debt securities

453 (54 ) 453 (54 )

Perpetual preferred securities

45 76 (8 ) 121 (8 )

Total available-for-sale

$ 10,812 $ (93 ) $ 10,048 $ (420 ) $ 20,860 $ (513 )

(a) The Company has $6 million of unrealized losses on residential non-agency mortgage-backed securities. Credit-related other-than-temporary impairment on these securities may occur if there is further deterioration in the underlying collateral pool performance. Borrower defaults may increase if economic conditions worsen. Additionally, deterioration in home prices may increase the severity of projected losses.
(b) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads).
(c) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.

The Company does not consider these unrealized losses to be credit-related. These unrealized losses primarily relate to changes in interest rates and market spreads subsequent to purchase. A substantial portion of investment securities that have unrealized losses are either corporate debt issued with high investment grade credit ratings or agency mortgage-backed securities. In general, the issuers of the investment securities are contractually prohibited from prepayment at less than par, and the Company did not pay significant purchase premiums for these investment securities. At September 30, 2014, the Company had no plans to sell investment securities with unrealized losses, and believes it is more likely than not it would not be required to sell such investment securities before recovery of their amortized cost.

U.S. Bancorp 45


Table of Contents
Note 5 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

The composition of the loan portfolio, disaggregated by class and underlying specific portfolio type, was as follows:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(Dollars in Millions) Amount Percent
of Total
Amount Percent
of Total

Commercial

Commercial

$ 73,600 30.0 % $ 64,762 27.5 %

Lease financing

5,278 2.1 5,271 2.3

Total commercial

78,878 32.1 70,033 29.8

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial mortgages

31,802 13.0 32,183 13.7

Construction and development

9,107 3.7 7,702 3.3

Total commercial real estate

40,909 16.7 39,885 17.0

Residential Mortgages

Residential mortgages

38,858 15.8 37,545 15.9

Home equity loans, first liens

13,099 5.3 13,611 5.8

Total residential mortgages

51,957 21.1 51,156 21.7

Credit Card

17,858 7.3 18,021 7.7

Other Retail

Retail leasing

5,999 2.5 5,929 2.5

Home equity and second mortgages

15,769 6.4 15,442 6.6

Revolving credit

3,242 1.3 3,276 1.4

Installment

6,173 2.5 5,709 2.4

Automobile

14,517 5.9 13,743 5.8

Student

3,235 1.3 3,579 1.5

Total other retail

48,935 19.9 47,678 20.2

Total loans, excluding covered loans

238,537 97.1 226,773 96.4

Covered Loans

7,054 2.9 8,462 3.6

Total loans

$ 245,591 100.0 % $ 235,235 100.0 %

The Company had loans of $79.4 billion at September 30, 2014, and $77.2 billion at December 31, 2013, pledged at the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), and loans of $61.8 billion at September 30, 2014, and $53.0 billion at December 31, 2013, pledged at the Federal Reserve Bank.

Originated loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned interest and deferred fees and costs. Net unearned interest and deferred fees and costs amounted to $575 million at September 30, 2014, and $556 million at December 31, 2013. All purchased loans and related indemnification assets are recorded at fair value at the date of purchase. The Company evaluates purchased loans for impairment at the date of purchase in accordance with applicable authoritative accounting guidance. Purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since origination for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected are considered “purchased impaired loans.” All other purchased loans are considered “purchased nonimpaired loans.”

46 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

On the acquisition date, the estimate of the contractually required payments receivable for all purchased nonimpaired loans acquired in the second quarter 2014 acquisition of Charter One were $1.5 billion. The contractual cash flows not expected to be collected on these loans of $247 million and the estimated fair value of the loans of $969 million were determined based upon the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. The contractual cash flows not expected to be collected primarily reflect a reduction in contractual interest payments resulting from these estimated prepayments. There were no purchased impaired loans acquired in the Charter One acquisition.

Changes in the accretable balance for purchased impaired loans were as follows:

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 1,487 $ 1,802 $ 1,655 $ 1,709

Accretion

(105 ) (119 ) (336 ) (380 )

Disposals

(34 ) (51 ) (103 ) (120 )

Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference (a)

38 119 172 177

Other (b)

(2 ) 365

Balance at end of period

$ 1,386 $ 1,751 $ 1,386 $ 1,751

(a) Primarily relates to changes in expected credit performance.
(b) The amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily represents the reclassification of unamortized decreases in the FDIC asset (which are presented as a separate component within the covered assets table on page 56 beginning in 2013), partially offset by the impact of changes in expectations about retaining covered single-family loans beyond the term of the indemnification agreements.

Allowance for Credit Losses The allowance for credit losses reserves for probable and estimable losses incurred in the Company’s loan and lease portfolio, including unfunded credit commitments, and includes certain amounts that do not represent loss exposure to the Company because those losses are recoverable under loss sharing agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The allowance for credit losses is increased through provisions charged to operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs. Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to ensure it appropriately reserves for incurred losses.

The allowance recorded for loans in the commercial lending segment is based on reviews of individual credit relationships and considers the migration analysis of commercial lending segment loans and actual loss experience. In the migration analysis applied to risk rated loan portfolios, the Company currently examines up to a 13-year period of loss experience. For each loan type, this historical loss experience is adjusted as necessary to consider any relevant changes in portfolio composition, lending policies, underwriting standards, risk management practices or economic conditions. The results of the analysis are evaluated quarterly to confirm an appropriate historical time frame is selected for each commercial loan type. The allowance recorded for impaired loans greater than $5 million in the commercial lending segment is based on an individual loan analysis utilizing expected cash flows discounted using the original effective interest rate, the observable market price of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans, rather than the migration analysis. The allowance recorded for all other commercial lending segment loans is determined on a homogenous pool basis and includes consideration of product mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, bankruptcy experience, portfolio growth and historical losses, adjusted for current trends. The Company also considers the impacts of any loan modifications made to commercial lending segment loans and any subsequent payment defaults to its expectations of cash flows, principal balance, and current expectations about the borrower’s ability to pay in determining the allowance for credit losses.

The allowance recorded for Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”) loans and purchased impaired loans in the consumer lending segment is determined on a homogenous pool basis utilizing expected cash flows discounted using the original effective interest rate of the pool, or the prior quarter effective rate, respectively. The allowance for collateral-dependent loans in the consumer lending segment is determined based on the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell. The allowance recorded for all other consumer lending segment loans is determined on a homogenous pool basis and includes consideration of product mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, bankruptcy experience, delinquency status, refreshed loan-to-value ratios when possible, portfolio growth and historical losses, adjusted for current trends. The Company also considers any modifications made to consumer lending segment loans including the impacts of any subsequent payment defaults since modification in determining the allowance for credit losses, such as the borrower’s ability to pay under the restructured terms, and the timing and amount of payments.

U.S. Bancorp

47


Table of Contents

The allowance for the covered loan segment is evaluated each quarter in a manner similar to that described for non-covered loans and reflects decreases in expected cash flows of those loans after the acquisition date. The provision for credit losses for covered loans considers the indemnification provided by the FDIC.

In addition, subsequent payment defaults on loan modifications considered TDRs are considered in the underlying factors used in the determination of the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses. For each loan segment, the Company estimates future loan charge-offs through a variety of analysis, trends and underlying assumptions. With respect to the commercial lending segment, TDRs may be collectively evaluated for impairment where observed performance history, including defaults, is a primary driver of the loss allocation. For commercial TDRs individually evaluated for impairment, attributes of the borrower are the primary factors in determining the allowance for credit losses. However, historical loss experience is also incorporated into the allowance methodology applied to this category of loans. With respect to the consumer lending segment, performance of the portfolio, including defaults on TDRs, is considered when estimating future cash flows.

The Company’s methodology for determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses for all the loan segments also considers the imprecision inherent in the methodologies used. As a result, in addition to the amounts determined under the methodologies described above, management also considers the potential impact of other qualitative factors which include, but are not limited to, economic factors; geographic and other concentration risks; delinquency and nonaccrual trends; current business conditions; changes in lending policy, underwriting standards, internal review and other relevant business practices; and the regulatory environment. The consideration of these items results in adjustments to allowance amounts included in the Company’s allowance for credit losses for each of the above loan segments.

The Company also assesses the credit risk associated with off-balance sheet loan commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives. Credit risk associated with derivatives is reflected in the fair values recorded for those positions. The liability for off-balance sheet credit exposure related to loan commitments and other credit guarantees is included in other liabilities. Because business processes and credit risks associated with unfunded credit commitments are essentially the same as for loans, the Company utilizes similar processes to estimate its liability for unfunded credit commitments.

Activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio class was as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30
(Dollars in Millions)
Commercial Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Mortgages
Credit
Card
Other
Retail
Total Loans,
Excluding
Covered Loans
Covered
Loans
Total
Loans

2014

Balance at beginning of period

$ 1,111 $ 725 $ 848 $ 874 $ 779 $ 4,337 $ 112 $ 4,449

Add

Provision for credit losses

83 (6 ) (13 ) 162 84 310 1 311

Deduct

Loans charged off

80 10 48 174 96 408 2 410

Less recoveries of loans charged off

(22 ) (6 ) (6 ) (16 ) (23 ) (73 ) (1 ) (74 )

Net loans charged off

58 4 42 158 73 335 1 336

Other changes (a)

(10 ) (10 )

Balance at end of period

$ 1,136 $ 715 $ 793 $ 878 $ 790 $ 4,312 $ 102 $ 4,414

2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 1,023 $ 777 $ 921 $ 874 $ 838 $ 4,433 $ 179 $ 4,612

Add

Provision for credit losses

19 (22 ) 70 151 84 302 (4 ) 298

Deduct

Loans charged off

65 17 62 175 122 441 9 450

Less recoveries of loans charged off

(54 ) (23 ) (5 ) (15 ) (24 ) (121 ) (1 ) (122 )

Net loans charged off

11 (6 ) 57 160 98 320 8 328

Other changes (a)

(4 ) (4 )

Balance at end of period

$ 1,031 $ 761 $ 934 $ 865 $ 824 $ 4,415 $ 163 $ 4,578

(a) Includes net changes in credit losses to be reimbursed by the FDIC and reductions in the allowance for covered loans where the reversal of a previously recorded allowance was offset by an associated decrease in the indemnification asset, and the impact of any loan sales.

48 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended September 30
(Dollars in Millions)
Commercial Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Mortgages
Credit
Card
Other
Retail
Total Loans,
Excluding
Covered Loans
Covered
Loans
Total
Loans

2014

Balance at beginnng of period

$ 1,075 $ 776 $ 875 $ 884 $ 781 $ 4,391 $ 146 $ 4,537

Add

Provision for credit losses

210 (64 ) 74 495 227 942 (1 ) 941

Deduct

Loans charged off

219 27 171 546 291 1,254 10 1,264

Less recoveries of loans charged off

(70 ) (30 ) (15 ) (48 ) (73 ) (236 ) (2 ) (238 )

Net loans charged off

149 (3 ) 156 498 218 1,018 8 1,026

Other changes (a)

(3 ) (3 ) (35 ) (38 )

Balance at end of period

$ 1,136 $ 715 $ 793 $ 878 $ 790 $ 4,312 $ 102 $ 4,414

2013

Balance at beginnng of period

$ 1,051 $ 857 $ 935 $ 863 $ 848 $ 4,554 $ 179 $ 4,733

Add

Provision for credit losses

64 (100 ) 222 495 305 986 77 1,063

Deduct

Loans charged off

184 76 243 559 412 1,474 31 1,505

Less recoveries of loans charged off

(100 ) (80 ) (20 ) (66 ) (83 ) (349 ) (3 ) (352 )

Net loans charged off

84 (4 ) 223 493 329 1,125 28 1,153

Other changes (a)

(65 ) (65 )

Balance at end of period

$ 1,031 $ 761 $ 934 $ 865 $ 824 $ 4,415 $ 163 $ 4,578

(a) Includes net changes in credit losses to be reimbursed by the FDIC and reductions in the allowance for covered loans where the reversal of a previously recorded allowance was offset by an associated decrease in the indemnification asset, and the impact of any loan sales.

Additional detail of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio class was as follows:

(Dollars in Millions) Commercial Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Mortgages
Credit
Card
Other
Retail
Total Loans,
Excluding
Covered Loans
Covered
Loans
Total
Loans

Allowance Balance at September 30, 2014 Related to

Loans individually evaluated for impairment (a)

$ 10 $ 6 $ $ $ $ 16 $ $ 16

TDRs collectively evaluated for impairment

13 15 308 64 44 444 3 447

Other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

1,113 662 485 814 746 3,820 2 3,822

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

32 32 97 129

Total allowance for credit losses

$ 1,136 $ 715 $ 793 $ 878 $ 790 $ 4,312 $ 102 $ 4,414

Allowance Balance at December 31, 2013 Related to

Loans individually evaluated for impairment (a)

$ 15 $ 17 $ $ $ $ 32 $ $ 32

TDRs collectively evaluated for impairment

19 26 329 87 55 516 4 520

Other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

1,041 700 546 797 726 3,810 5 3,815

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

33 33 137 170

Total allowance for credit losses

$ 1,075 $ 776 $ 875 $ 884 $ 781 $ 4,391 $ 146 $ 4,537

(a) Represents the allowance for credit losses related to loans greater than $5 million classified as nonperforming or TDRs.

Additional detail of loan balances by portfolio class was as follows:

(Dollars in Millions) Commercial Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Mortgages
Credit
Card
Other
Retail
Total Loans,
Excluding
Covered Loans
Covered
Loans (b)
Total
Loans

September 30, 2014

Loans individually evaluated for impairment (a)

$ 237 $ 158 $ $ $ $ 395 $ 52 $ 447

TDRs collectively evaluated for impairment

129 273 4,916 256 248 5,822 74 5,896

Other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

78,511 40,368 47,041 17,602 48,687 232,209 3,615 235,824

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

1 110 111 3,313 3,424

Total loans

$ 78,878 $ 40,909 $ 51,957 $ 17,858 $ 48,935 $ 238,537 $ 7,054 $ 245,591

December 31, 2013

Loans individually evaluated for impairment (a)

$ 197 $ 237 $ $ $ $ 434 $ 62 $ 496

TDRs collectively evaluated for impairment

155 358 5,064 310 269 6,156 87 6,243

Other loans collectively evaluated for impairment

69,680 39,129 46,090 17,711 47,409 220,019 4,538 224,557

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

1 161 2 164 3,775 3,939

Total loans

$ 70,033 $ 39,885 $ 51,156 $ 18,021 $ 47,678 $ 226,773 $ 8,462 $ 235,235

(a) Represents loans greater than $5 million classified as nonperforming or TDRs.
(b) Includes expected reimbursements from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements.

U.S. Bancorp

49


Table of Contents

Credit Quality The quality of the Company’s loan portfolios is assessed as a function of net credit losses, levels of nonperforming assets and delinquencies, and credit quality ratings as defined by the Company.

For all loan classes, loans are considered past due based on the number of days delinquent except for monthly amortizing loans which are classified delinquent based upon the number of contractually required payments not made (for example, two missed payments is considered 30 days delinquent). When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed.

Commercial lending segment loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when the collection of principal and interest has become 90 days past due or is otherwise considered doubtful. Commercial lending segment loans are generally fully or partially charged down to the fair value of the collateral securing the loan, less costs to sell, when the loan is considered uncollectible.

Consumer lending segment loans are generally charged-off at a specific number of days or payments past due. Residential mortgages and other retail loans secured by 1-4 family properties are generally charged down to the fair value of the collateral securing the loan, less costs to sell, at 180 days past due, and placed on nonaccrual status in instances where a partial charge-off occurs unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Loans and lines in a junior lien position secured by 1-4 family properties are placed on nonaccrual status at 120 days past due or when behind a first lien that has become 180 days or greater past due or placed on nonaccrual status. Any secured consumer lending segment loan whose borrower has had debt discharged through bankruptcy, for which the loan amount exceeds the fair value of the collateral, is charged down to the fair value of the related collateral and the remaining balance is placed on nonaccrual status. Credit card loans continue to accrue interest until the account is charged off. Credit cards are charged off at 180 days past due. Other retail loans not secured by 1-4 family properties are charged-off at 120 days past due; and revolving consumer lines are charged off at 180 days past due. Similar to credit cards, other retail loans are generally not placed on nonaccrual status because of the relative short period of time to charge-off. Certain retail customers having financial difficulties may have the terms of their credit card and other loan agreements modified to require only principal payments and, as such, are reported as nonaccrual.

For all loan classes, interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are generally recorded as a reduction to the loan carrying amount. Interest payments are generally recorded as reductions to a loan’s carrying amount while a loan is on nonaccrual and are recognized as interest income upon payoff of the loan. Interest income may be recognized for interest payments if the remaining carrying amount of the loan is believed to be collectible. In certain circumstances, loans in any class may be restored to accrual status, such as when a loan has demonstrated sustained repayment performance or no amounts are past due and prospects for future payment are no longer in doubt, or when the loan becomes well secured and is in the process of collection. Loans where there has been a partial charge-off may be returned to accrual status if all principal and interest (including amounts previously charged-off) is expected to be collected and the loan is current.

Covered loans not considered to be purchased impaired are evaluated for delinquency, nonaccrual status and charge-off consistent with the class of loan they would be included in had the loss share coverage not been in place. Generally, purchased impaired loans are considered accruing loans. However, the timing and amount of future cash flows for some loans is not reasonably estimable. Those loans are classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income is not recognized until the timing and amount of the future cash flows can be reasonably estimated.

50 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of loans by portfolio class, including the delinquency status of those that continue to accrue interest, and those that are nonperforming:

Accruing
(Dollars in Millions) Current 30-89 Days
Past Due
90 Days or
More Past Due
Nonperforming Total

September 30, 2014

Commercial

$ 78,453 $ 215 $ 37 $ 173 $ 78,878

Commercial real estate

40,606 50 12 241 40,909

Residential mortgages (a)

50,662 243 211 841 51,957

Credit card

17,403 219 196 40 17,858

Other retail

48,453 222 76 184 48,935

Total loans, excluding covered loans

235,577 949 532 1,479 238,537

Covered loans

6,434 102 430 88 7,054

Total loans

$ 242,011 $ 1,051 $ 962 $ 1,567 $ 245,591

December 31, 2013

Commercial

$ 69,587 $ 257 $ 55 $ 134 $ 70,033

Commercial real estate

39,459 94 29 303 39,885

Residential mortgages (a)

49,695 358 333 770 51,156

Credit card

17,507 226 210 78 18,021

Other retail

47,156 245 86 191 47,678

Total loans, excluding covered loans

223,404 1,180 713 1,476 226,773

Covered loans

7,693 166 476 127 8,462

Total loans

$ 231,097 $ 1,346 $ 1,189 $ 1,603 $ 235,235

(a) At September 30, 2014, $422 million of loans 30–89 days past due and $3.1 billion of loans 90 days or more past due purchased from Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs, were classified as current, compared with $440 million and $3.7 billion at December 31, 2013, respectively.

At September 30, 2014, the amount of foreclosed residential real estate held by the Company, and included in other real estate owned, was $273 million ($236 million excluding covered assets). This excludes $623 million of foreclosed residential real estate related to mortgage loans whose payments are primarily insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In addition, the amount of residential mortgage loans secured by residential real estate in the process of foreclosure at September 30, 2014, was $3.0 billion, of which $2.1 billion related to loans purchased from Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Company classifies its loan portfolios using internal credit quality ratings on a quarterly basis. These ratings include: pass, special mention and classified, and are an important part of the Company’s overall credit risk management process and evaluation of the allowance for credit losses. Loans with a pass rating represent those not classified on the Company’s rating scale for problem credits, as minimal credit risk has been identified. Special mention loans are those that have a potential weakness deserving management’s close attention. Classified loans are those where a well-defined weakness has been identified that may put full collection of contractual cash flows at risk. It is possible that others, given the same information, may reach different reasonable conclusions regarding the credit quality rating classification of specific loans.

U.S. Bancorp

51


Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of loans by portfolio class and the Company’s internal credit quality rating:

Criticized
(Dollars in Millions) Pass Special
Mention
Classified (a) Total
Criticized
Total

September 30, 2014

Commercial

$ 76,688 $ 1,396 $ 794 $ 2,190 $ 78,878

Commercial real estate

39,591 474 844 1,318 40,909

Residential mortgages (b)

50,817 8 1,132 1,140 51,957

Credit card

17,622 236 236 17,858

Other retail

48,569 18 348 366 48,935

Total loans, excluding covered loans

233,287 1,896 3,354 5,250 238,537

Covered loans

6,852 3 199 202 7,054

Total loans

$ 240,139 $ 1,899 $ 3,553 $ 5,452 $ 245,591

Total outstanding commitments

$ 494,015 $ 2,990 $ 4,201 $ 7,191 $ 501,206

December 31, 2013

Commercial

$ 68,075 $ 1,013 $ 945 $ 1,958 $ 70,033

Commercial real estate

38,113 616 1,156 1,772 39,885

Residential mortgages (b)

50,152 5 999 1,004 51,156

Credit card

17,733 288 288 18,021

Other retail

47,313 27 338 365 47,678

Total loans, excluding covered loans

221,386 1,661 3,726 5,387 226,773

Covered loans

8,160 18 284 302 8,462

Total loans

$ 229,546 $ 1,679 $ 4,010 $ 5,689 $ 235,235

Total outstanding commitments

$ 470,046 $ 2,939 $ 4,812 $ 7,751 $ 477,797

(a) Classified rating on consumer loans primarily based on delinquency status.
(b) At September 30, 2014, $3.1 billion of GNMA loans 90 days or more past due and $2.5 billion of restructured GNMA loans whose repayments are insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs were classified with a pass rating, compared with $3.7 billion and $2.6 billion at December 31, 2013, respectively.

For all loan classes, a loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current events or information, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due per the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include all nonaccrual and TDR loans. For all loan classes, interest income on TDR loans is recognized under the modified terms and conditions if the borrower has demonstrated repayment performance at a level commensurate with the modified terms over several payment cycles. Interest income is generally not recognized on other impaired loans until the loan is paid off. However, interest income may be recognized for interest payments if the remaining carrying amount of the loan is believed to be collectible.

Factors used by the Company in determining whether all principal and interest payments due on commercial and commercial real estate loans will be collected and therefore whether those loans are impaired include, but are not limited to, the financial condition of the borrower, collateral and/or guarantees on the loan, and the borrower’s estimated future ability to pay based on industry, geographic location and certain financial ratios. The evaluation of impairment on residential mortgages, credit card loans and other retail loans is primarily driven by delinquency status of individual loans or whether a loan has been modified, and considers any government guarantee where applicable. Individual covered loans, whose future losses are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC that substantially reduce the risk of credit losses to the Company, are evaluated for impairment and accounted for in a manner consistent with the class of loan they would have been included in had the loss sharing coverage not been in place.

52 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

A summary of impaired loans by portfolio class was as follows:

(Dollars in Millions) Period-end
Recorded
Investment (a)
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Valuation
Allowance
Commitments
to Lend
Additional
Funds

September 30, 2014

Commercial

$ 408 $ 848 $ 27 $ 135

Commercial real estate

525 1,037 30 14

Residential mortgages

2,740 3,678 261

Credit card

256 256 64

Other retail

368 413 47 4

Total impaired loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

4,297 6,232 429 153

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

2,478 2,478 51

Covered loans

295 607 20 1

Total

$ 7,070 $ 9,317 $ 500 $ 154

December 31, 2013

Commercial

$ 382 $ 804 $ 36 $ 54

Commercial real estate

693 1,322 51 40

Residential mortgages

2,767 3,492 308

Credit card

310 310 87

Other retail

391 593 59 14

Total impaired loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

4,543 6,521 541 108

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

2,607 2,607 28

Covered loans

452 1,008 30 4

Total

$ 7,602 $ 10,136 $ 599 $ 112

(a) Substantially all loans classified as impaired at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, had an associated allowance for credit losses.

Additional information on impaired loans follows:

2014 2013
(Dollars in Millions) Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized

Three Months Ended September 30

Commercial

$ 425 $ 4 $ 380 $ 5

Commercial real estate

541 4 819 6

Residential mortgages

2,740 33 2,765 32

Credit card

264 1 347 3

Other retail

373 5 417 7

Total impaired loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

4,343 47 4,728 53

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

2,647 29 1,883 22

Covered loans

335 5 519 6

Total

$ 7,325 $ 81 $ 7,130 $ 81

Nine Months Ended September 30

Commercial

$ 430 $ 8 $ 384 $ 24

Commercial real estate

598 17 950 27

Residential mortgages

2,744 105 2,744 99

Credit card

281 7 380 12

Other retail

381 13 431 19

Total impaired loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

4,434 150 4,889 181

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

2,691 95 1,869 68

Covered loans

389 15 588 21

Total

$ 7,514 $ 260 $ 7,346 $ 270

Troubled Debt Restructurings In certain circumstances, the Company may modify the terms of a loan to maximize the collection of amounts due when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties or is expected to experience difficulties in the near-term. Concessionary modifications are classified as TDRs unless the modification results in only an insignificant delay in payments to be received. The Company recognizes interest on TDRs if the borrower complies with the revised terms and conditions as agreed upon with the Company and has demonstrated repayment performance at a level commensurate with the modified terms over several payment cycles. To the extent a previous restructuring was insignificant, the Company considers the cumulative effect of past restructurings related to the receivable when determining whether a current restructuring is a TDR. Loans classified as TDRs are considered impaired loans for reporting and measurement purposes.

U.S. Bancorp

53


Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of loans modified as TDRs during the periods presented by portfolio class:

2014 2013
(Dollars in Millions)

Number

of Loans

Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Loan Balance
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Loan Balance
Number
of Loans
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Loan Balance
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Loan Balance

Three Months Ended September 30

Commercial

448 $ 28 $ 26 551 $ 62 $ 60

Commercial real estate

27 14 13 48 76 73

Residential mortgages

525 71 70 338 42 42

Credit card

6,708 35 36 6,447 39 38

Other retail

810 18 18 847 21 21

Total loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

8,518 166 163 8,231 240 234

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

2,273 278 278 2,315 300 284

Covered loans

18 3 3 38 19 11

Total loans

10,809 $ 447 $ 444 10,584 $ 559 $ 529

Nine Months Ended September 30

Commercial

1,633 $ 181 $ 169 1,962 $ 150 $ 140

Commercial real estate

54 33 28 147 193 186

Residential mortgages

1,732 232 231 1,575 214 210

Credit card

20,040 111 112 20,147 122 122

Other retail

2,246 52 52 3,519 86 85

Total loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

25,705 609 592 27,350 765 743

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

7,198 816 803 6,450 822 782

Covered loans

38 14 13 109 85 64

Total loans

32,941 $ 1,439 $ 1,408 33,909 $ 1,672 $ 1,589

Residential mortgages, home equity and second mortgages, and loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools in the table above include trial period arrangements offered to customers during the periods presented. The post-modification balances for these loans reflect the current outstanding balance until a permanent modification is made. In addition, the post-modification balances typically include capitalization of unpaid accrued interest and/or fees under the various modification programs. For those loans modified as TDRs during the third quarter of 2014, at September 30, 2014, 310 residential mortgages, 49 home equity and second mortgage loans and 1,764 loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools with outstanding balances of $40 million, $3 million and $231million, respectively, were in a trial period and have estimated post-modification balances of $41 million, $3 million and $232 million, respectively, assuming permanent modification occurs at the end of the trial period.

The Company has implemented certain restructuring programs that may result in TDRs. However, many of the Company’s TDRs are also determined on a case-by-case basis in connection with ongoing loan collection processes.

For the commercial lending segment, modifications generally result in the Company working with borrowers on a case-by-case basis. Commercial and commercial real estate modifications generally include extensions of the maturity date and may be accompanied by an increase or decrease to the interest rate, which may not be deemed a market rate of interest. In addition, the Company may work with the borrower in identifying other changes that mitigate loss to the Company, which may include additional collateral or guarantees to support the loan. To a lesser extent, the Company may waive contractual principal. The Company classifies these concessions as TDRs to the extent the Company determines that the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty.

Modifications for the consumer lending segment are generally part of programs the Company has initiated. The Company participates in the U.S. Department of Treasury Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”). HAMP gives qualifying homeowners an opportunity to permanently modify residential mortgage loans and achieve more affordable monthly payments, with the U.S. Department of Treasury compensating the Company for a portion of the reduction in monthly amounts due from borrowers participating in this program. The Company also modifies residential mortgage loans under Federal Housing Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, or its own internal programs. Under these programs, the Company provides concessions to qualifying borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. The concessions may include adjustments to interest rates, conversion of adjustable rates to fixed rates, extension of maturity dates or deferrals of payments, capitalization of accrued interest and/or outstanding advances, or in limited situations, partial forgiveness of loan principal. In most instances, participation in residential mortgage loan restructuring programs requires the customer to complete a short-term trial period. A permanent loan modification is contingent on the customer successfully completing the trial period arrangement and the loan documents are not modified until that time. The Company reports loans in a trial period arrangement as TDRs.

54 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Credit card and other retail loan modifications are generally part of distinct restructuring programs providing customers experiencing financial difficulty with modifications whereby balances may be amortized up to 60 months, and generally include waiver of fees and reduced interest rates.

In addition, the Company considers secured loans to consumer borrowers that have debt discharged through bankruptcy where the borrower has not reaffirmed the debt to be TDRs.

Modifications to loans in the covered segment are similar in nature to that described above for non-covered loans, and the evaluation and determination of TDR status is similar, except that acquired loans restructured after acquisition are not considered TDRs for accounting and disclosure purposes if the loans evidenced credit deterioration as of the acquisition date and are accounted for in pools. Losses associated with the modification on covered loans, including the economic impact of interest rate reductions, are generally eligible for reimbursement under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.

The following table provides a summary of TDR loans that defaulted (fully or partially charged-off or became 90 days or more past due) during the periods presented that were modified as TDRs within 12 months previous to default:

2014 2013
(Dollars in Millions) Number
of Loans
Amount
Defaulted
Number
of Loans
Amount
Defaulted

Three Months Ended September 30

Commercial

161 $ 34 143 $ 37

Commercial real estate

4 30 18

Residential mortgages

147 22 303 41

Credit card

1,665 9 1,485 8

Other retail

146 5 278 10

Total loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

2,123 70 2,239 114

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

366 41 492 69

Covered loans

4 1 24 25

Total loans

2,493 $ 112 2,755 $ 208

Nine Months Ended September 30

Commercial

456 $ 42 483 $ 42

Commercial real estate

16 10 72 90

Residential mortgages

424 61 673 100

Credit card

4,586 25 5,109 29

Other retail

489 15 1,164 53

Total loans, excluding GNMA and covered loans

5,971 153 7,501 314

Loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools

542 63 4,795 615

Covered loans

14 5 49 37

Total loans

6,527 $ 221 12,345 $ 966

In addition to the defaults in the table above, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company had a total of 435 and 1,313 residential mortgage loans, home equity and second mortgage loans and loans purchased from GNMA mortgage pools with aggregate outstanding balances of $57 million and $159 million, respectively, where borrowers did not successfully complete the trial period arrangement and therefore are no longer eligible for a permanent modification under the applicable modification program.

U.S. Bancorp

55


Table of Contents

Covered Assets Covered assets represent loans and other assets acquired from the FDIC, subject to loss sharing agreements, and include expected reimbursements from the FDIC. Effective December 31, 2014, the loss sharing coverage provided by the FDIC expires on all covered assets, except for single family residential mortgages that remain covered under loss sharing agreements with remaining terms up to five years. The carrying amount of the covered assets consisted of purchased impaired loans, purchased nonimpaired loans and other assets as shown in the following table:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(Dollars in Millions) Purchased
Impaired
Loans
Purchased
Nonimpaired
Loans
Other
Assets
Total Purchased
Impaired
Loans
Purchased
Nonimpaired
Loans
Other
Assets
Total

Commercial loans

$ $ 21 $ $ 21 $ $ 32 $ $ 32

Commercial real estate loans

464 1,093 1,557 738 1,494 2,232

Residential mortgage loans

2,849 774 3,623 3,037 890 3,927

Credit card loans

4 4 5 5

Other retail loans

605 605 666 666

Losses reimbursable by the FDIC (a)

737 737 798 798

Unamortized changes in FDIC asset (b)

507 507 802 802

Covered loans

3,313 2,497 1,244 7,054 3,775 3,087 1,600 8,462

Foreclosed real estate

72 72 97 97

Total covered assets

$ 3,313 $ 2,497 $ 1,316 $ 7,126 $ 3,775 $ 3,087 $ 1,697 $ 8,559

(a) Relates to loss sharing agreements with remaining terms up to five years.
(b) Represents decreases in expected reimbursements by the FDIC as a result of decreases in expected losses on the covered loans. These amounts are amortized as a reduction in interest income on covered loans over the shorter of the expected life of the respective covered loans or the remaining contractual term of the indemnification agreements.

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $5 million of the purchased impaired loans included in covered loans were classified as nonperforming assets, because the expected cash flows are primarily based on the liquidation of underlying collateral and the timing and amount of the cash flows could not be reasonably estimated. Interest income is recognized on other purchased impaired loans through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of those loans and their expected cash flows. The initial determination of the fair value of the purchased loans includes the impact of expected credit losses and, therefore, no allowance for credit losses is recorded at the purchase date. To the extent credit deterioration occurs after the date of acquisition, the Company records an allowance for credit losses.

Note 6 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Variable Interest Entities

The Company transfers financial assets in the normal course of business. The majority of the Company’s financial asset transfers are residential mortgage loan sales primarily to government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”), transfers of tax-advantaged investments, commercial loan sales through participation agreements, and other individual or portfolio loan and securities sales. In accordance with the accounting guidance for asset transfers, the Company considers any ongoing involvement with transferred assets in determining whether the assets can be derecognized from the balance sheet. Guarantees provided to certain third parties in connection with the transfer of assets are further discussed in Note 16.

For loans sold under participation agreements, the Company also considers whether the terms of the loan participation agreement meet the accounting definition of a participating interest. With the exception of servicing and certain performance-based guarantees, the Company’s continuing involvement with financial assets sold is minimal and generally limited to market customary representation and warranty clauses. Any gain or loss on sale depends on the previous carrying amount of the transferred financial assets, the consideration received, and any liabilities incurred in exchange for the transferred assets. Upon transfer, any servicing assets and other interests that continue to be held by the Company are initially recognized at fair value. For further information on mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), refer to Note 7. On a limited basis, the Company may acquire and package high-grade corporate bonds for select corporate customers, in which the Company generally has no continuing involvement with these transactions. Additionally, the Company is an authorized GNMA issuer and issues GNMA securities on a regular basis. The Company has no other asset securitizations or similar asset-backed financing arrangements that are off-balance sheet.

The Company is involved in various entities that are considered to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The Company’s investments in VIEs are primarily related to investments promoting affordable housing, community development and renewable energy sources. Some of these tax-advantaged investments support the Company’s regulatory compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. The Company’s investments in these entities generate a return primarily through the realization of federal and state income tax credits, and other tax benefits, such as tax deductions from operating losses of the investments, over specified time periods. These tax credits are recognized as

56 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

a reduction of tax expense or, for investments qualifying as investment tax credits, as a reduction to the related investment asset. In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued accounting guidance for qualified affordable housing projects. This new guidance permits the Company to present the expense on certain qualified affordable housing investments in tax expense rather than noninterest expense. The Company adopted this guidance January 1, 2014, on a prospective basis, because the impact on prior financial statements was not material. The Company recognized federal and state income tax credits related to its affordable housing and other tax-advantaged investments in tax expense of $189 million and $187 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $546 million and $527 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company also recognized $262 million and $254 million of investment tax credits for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $582 million and $454 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company recognized $187 million and $247 million of expenses related to all of these investments for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, of which $60 million and $87 million, respectively, was included in tax expense and the remainder was included in noninterest expense. The Company recognized $517 million and $686 million of expenses related to all of these investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, of which $190 million and $267 million, respectively, was included in tax expense and the remainder was included in noninterest expense.

The Company is not required to consolidate VIEs in which it has concluded it does not have a controlling financial interest, and thus is not the primary beneficiary. In such cases, the Company does not have both the power to direct the entities’ most significant activities and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. The Company’s investments in these unconsolidated VIEs, including funded and unfunded capital commitments, are carried in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company’s unfunded capital and other commitments related to these unconsolidated VIEs are generally carried in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these unconsolidated VIEs include the investment recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, net of unfunded capital commitments, and previously recorded tax credits which remain subject to recapture by taxing authorities based on compliance features required to be met at the project level. While the Company believes potential losses from these investments are remote, the maximum exposure was determined by assuming a scenario where the community-based business and housing projects completely fail and do not meet certain government compliance requirements resulting in recapture of the related tax credits.

The following table provides a summary of investments in community development and tax-advantaged VIEs that the Company has not consolidated:

(Dollars in Millions) September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Investment carrying amount

$ 4,385 $ 4,178

Unfunded capital and other commitments

1,850 1,661

Maximum exposure to loss

8,038 7,390

The Company’s individual net investments in these unconsolidated VIEs, which exclude any unfunded capital commitments, ranged from less than $1 million to $54 million at September 30, 2014, compared with less than $1 million to $37 million at December 31, 2013.

In addition, the Company sponsors entities to which it transfers tax-advantaged investments to third parties. At September 30, 2014, approximately $2.6 billion of the Company’s assets and $2.0 billion of its liabilities included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet were related to community development and tax-advantaged investment VIEs which the Company has consolidated, primarily related to these transfers. These amounts compared to $2.5 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2013. The majority of the assets of these consolidated VIEs are reported in other assets, and the liabilities are reported in long-term debt and other liabilities. The assets of a particular VIE are the primary source of funds to settle its obligations. The creditors of the VIEs do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company. The Company’s exposure to the consolidated VIEs is generally limited to the carrying value of its variable interests plus any related tax credits previously recognized or transferred to others with a guarantee.

The Company also sponsors a conduit to which it previously transferred high-grade investment securities. The Company consolidates the conduit because of its ability to manage the activities of the conduit. At September 30, 2014, $114 million of the held-to-maturity investment securities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet were related to the conduit, compared with $116 million at December 31, 2013.

U.S. Bancorp

57


Table of Contents

In addition, the Company sponsors a municipal bond securities tender option bond program. The Company controls the activities of the program’s entities, is entitled to the residual returns and provides credit, liquidity and remarketing arrangements to the program. As a result, the Company has consolidated the program’s entities. At September 30, 2014, $4.1 billion of available-for-sale securities and $3.9 billion of short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheet were related to the tender option bond program, compared with $4.6 billion of available-for-sale securities and $4.6 billion of short-term borrowings at December 31, 2013.

The Company also has noncontrolling financial investments in private investment funds and partnerships considered VIEs, which are not consolidated. The Company’s recorded investment in these entities, carried in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, was approximately $97 million at September 30, 2014, compared with $98 million at December 31, 2013. The maximum exposure to loss related to these VIEs was $106 million at September 30, 2014 and $107 million at December 31, 2013, representing the Company’s investment balance and its unfunded commitments to invest additional amounts.

Note 7 Mortgage Servicing Rights

The Company serviced $224.6 billion of residential mortgage loans for others at September 30, 2014, and $226.8 billion at December 31, 2013, which include subserviced mortgages with no corresponding MSRs asset. The net impact included in mortgage banking revenue of fair value changes of MSRs due to changes in valuation assumptions and derivatives used to economically hedge MSRs were net gains of $49 million and $108 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and net gains of $200 million (of which $44 million related to excess servicing rights sold during the second quarter of 2014) and $163 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Loan servicing fees, not including valuation changes, included in mortgage banking revenue, were $178 million and $192 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $551 million and $566 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Changes in fair value of capitalized MSRs are summarized as follows:

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 2,412 $ 2,377 $ 2,680 $ 1,700

Rights purchased

1 2 3 7

Rights capitalized

109 187 264 674

Rights sold

(141 )

Changes in fair value of MSRs

Due to fluctuations in market interest rates (a)

29 71 (129 ) 503

Due to revised assumptions or models (b)

15 42 71 33

Other changes in fair value (c)

(105 ) (102 ) (287 ) (340 )

Balance at end of period

$ 2,461 $ 2,577 $ 2,461 $ 2,577

(a) Includes changes in MSR value associated with changes in market interest rates, including estimated prepayment rates and anticipated earnings on escrow deposits.
(b) Includes changes in MSR value not caused by changes in market interest rates, such as changes in cost to service, ancillary income, and discount rate, as well as the impact of any model changes.
(c) Primarily represents changes due to realization of expected cash flows over time (decay).

The estimated sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the fair value of the MSRs portfolio and the related derivative instruments was as follows:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Down Down Down Up Up Up Down Down Down Up Up Up
(Dollars in Millions) 100 bps 50 bps 25 bps 25 bps 50 bps 100 bps 100 bps 50 bps 25 bps 25 bps 50 bps 100 bps

MSR portfolio

$ (490 ) $ (212 ) $ (99 ) $ 84 $ 157 $ 297 $ (435 ) $ (199 ) $ (93 ) $ 82 $ 154 $ 287

Derivative instrument hedges

391 196 94 (87 ) (167 ) (319 ) 399 194 91 (82 ) (157 ) (301 )

Net sensitivity

$ (99 ) $ (16 ) $ (5 ) $ (3 ) $ (10 ) $ (22 ) $ (36 ) $ (5 ) $ (2 ) $ $ (3 ) $ (14 )

The fair value of MSRs and their sensitivity to changes in interest rates is influenced by the mix of the servicing portfolio and characteristics of each segment of the portfolio. The Company’s servicing portfolio consists of the distinct portfolios of government-insured mortgages, conventional mortgages and Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs (“MRBP”). The servicing portfolios are predominantly comprised of fixed-rate agency loans with limited adjustable-rate or jumbo mortgage loans. The MRBP division specializes in servicing loans made under state and local housing authority programs. These programs provide mortgages to low-income and moderate-income borrowers and are generally government-insured programs with a favorable rate subsidy, down payment and/or closing cost assistance.

58 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

A summary of the Company’s MSRs and related characteristics by portfolio was as follows:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(Dollars in Millions) MRBP Government Conventional (b) Total MRBP Government Conventional (b) Total

Servicing portfolio

$ 18,052 $ 40,600 $ 163,757 $ 222,409 $ 15,896 $ 41,659 $ 169,287 $ 226,842

Fair value

$ 199 $ 469 $ 1,793 $ 2,461 $ 180 $ 500 $ 2,000 $ 2,680

Value (bps) (a)

110 116 109 111 113 120 118 118

Weighted-average servicing fees (bps)

37 33 27 29 39 32 29 30

Multiple (value/servicing fees)

2.97 3.52 4.04 3.83 2.90 3.75 4.07 3.93

Weighted-average note rate

4.62 % 4.20 % 4.15 % 4.20 % 4.70 % 4.24 % 4.17 % 4.22 %

Weighted-average age (in years)

3.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.8 2.6 2.5 2.6

Weighted-average expected prepayment (constant prepayment rate)

12.9 % 12.4 % 10.6 % 11.1 % 13.5 % 11.5 % 10.9 % 11.2 %

Weighted-average expected life (in years)

6.2 6.4 7.0 6.8 6.2 6.9 7.2 7.1

Weighted-average discount rate

11.9 % 11.2 % 9.6 % 10.1 % 11.9 % 11.2 % 9.8 % 10.2 %

(a) Value is calculated as fair value divided by the servicing portfolio.
(b) Represents loans sold primarily to GSEs.

Note 8 Preferred Stock

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had authority to issue 50 million shares of preferred stock. The number of shares issued and outstanding and the carrying amount of each outstanding series of the Company’s preferred stock were as follows:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Shares Shares
Issued and Liquidation Carrying Issued and Liquidation Carrying
(Dollars in Millions) Outstanding Preference Discount Amount Outstanding Preference Discount Amount

Series A

12,510 $ 1,251 $ 145 $ 1,106 12,510 $ 1,251 $ 145 $ 1,106

Series B

40,000 1,000 1,000 40,000 1,000 1,000

Series F

44,000 1,100 12 1,088 44,000 1,100 12 1,088

Series G

43,400 1,085 10 1,075 43,400 1,085 10 1,075

Series H

20,000 500 13 487 20,000 500 13 487

Total preferred stock (a)

159,910 $ 4,936 $ 180 $ 4,756 159,910 $ 4,936 $ 180 $ 4,756

(a) The par value of all shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, was $1.00 per share.

Note 9 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Shareholders’ equity is affected by transactions and valuations of asset and liability positions that require adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The reconciliation of the transactions affecting accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in shareholders’ equity is as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30
(Dollars in Millions)
Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on
Securities
Available-For-
Sale

Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on

Securities
Transferred From
Available-For-Sale
to Held-To-

Maturity

Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on
Derivative
Hedges
Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on
Retirement Plans
Foreign Currency
Translation
Total

2014

Balance at beginning of period

$ 233 $ 60 $ (225 ) $ (699 ) $ (51 ) $ (682 )

Changes in unrealized gains and losses

(21 ) 16 (5 )

Other-than-temporary impairment not recognized in earnings on securities available-for-sale

Foreign currency translation adjustment

4 4

Reclassification to earnings of realized gains and losses

3 (7 ) 45 35 76

Applicable income taxes

7 3 (23 ) (14 ) (2 ) (29 )

Balance at end of period

$ 222 $ 56 $ (187 ) $ (678 ) $ (49 ) $ (636 )

2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 185 $ 84 $ (313 ) $ (1,184 ) $ (60 ) $ (1,288 )

Changes in unrealized gains and losses

(237 ) (17 ) $ 38 (216 )

Other-than-temporary impairment not recognized in earnings on securities available-for-sale

1 1

Foreign currency translation adjustment

13 13

Reclassification to earnings of realized gains and losses

3 (13 ) 47 62 99

Applicable income taxes

89 5 (11 ) (38 ) (5 ) 40

Balance at end of period

$ 41 $ 76 $ (294 ) $ (1,122 ) $ (52 ) $ (1,351 )

U.S. Bancorp

59


Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in Millions)

Unrealized Gains

(Losses) on

Securities

Available-For-
Sale

Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on

Securities
Transferred From
Available-For-Sale
to Held-To-

Maturity

Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on
Derivative
Hedges
Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on
Retirement Plans
Foreign Currency
Translation
Total

2014

Balance at beginning of period

$ (77 ) $ 70 $ (261 ) $ (743 ) $ (60 ) $ (1,071 )

Changes in unrealized gains and losses

486 (19 ) 467

Other-than-temporary impairment not recognized in
earnings on securities available-for-sale

1 1

Foreign currency translation adjustment

18 18

Reclassification to earnings of realized gains and
losses

(2 ) (23 ) 139 107 221

Applicable income taxes

(186 ) 9 (46 ) (42 ) (7 ) (272 )

Balance at end of period

$ 222 $ 56 $ (187 ) $ (678 ) $ (49 ) $ (636 )

2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 679 $ 107 $ (404 ) $ (1,265 ) $ (40 ) $ (923 )

Changes in unrealized gains and losses

(1,032 ) 33 37 (962 )

Other-than-temporary impairment not recognized in

earnings on securities available-for-sale

8 8

Foreign currency translation adjustment

(20 ) (20 )

Reclassification to earnings of realized gains and
losses

(8 ) (50 ) 142 186 270

Applicable income taxes

394 19 (65 ) (80 ) 8 276

Balance at end of period

$ 41 $ 76 $ (294 ) $ (1,122 ) $ (52 ) $ (1,351 )

Additional detail about the impact to net income for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and into earnings, is as follows:

Impact to Net Income
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Affected Line Item in the
Consolidated Statement of Income
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale

Realized gains (losses) on sale of securities

$ $ $ 8 $ 21 Total securities gains (losses),
net

Other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings

(3 ) (3 ) (6 ) (13 )
(3 ) (3 ) 2 8 Total before tax
1 1 (1 ) (3 ) Applicable income taxes
(2 ) (2 ) 1 5 Net-of-tax

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity

Amortization of unrealized gains

7 13 23 50 Interest income
(3 ) (5 ) (9 ) (19 ) Applicable income taxes
4 8 14 31 Net-of-tax

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative hedges

Realized gains (losses) on derivative hedges

(45 ) (47 ) (139 ) (142 ) Net interest income
17 18 53 55 Applicable income taxes
(28 ) (29 ) (86 ) (87 ) Net-of-tax

Unrealized gains (losses) on retirement plans

Actuarial gains (losses), prior service cost (credit) and transition obligation (asset) amortization

(35 ) (62 ) (107 ) (186 ) Employee benefits expense
14 24 42 72 Applicable income taxes
(21 ) (38 ) (65 ) (114 ) Net-of-tax

Total impact to net income

$ (47 ) $ (61 ) $ (136 ) $ (165 )

60 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Note 10 Earnings Per Share

The components of earnings per share were:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 1,471 $ 1,468 $ 4,363 $ 4,380

Preferred dividends

(60 ) (61 ) (181 ) (189 )

Impact of preferred stock redemption (a)

(8 )

Earnings allocated to participating stock awards

(6 ) (7 ) (19 ) (20 )

Net income applicable to U.S. Bancorp common shareholders

$ 1,405 $ 1,400 $ 4,163 $ 4,163

Average common shares outstanding

1,798 1,832 1,809 1,844

Net effect of the exercise and assumed purchase of stock awards

9 11 10 10

Average diluted common shares outstanding

1,807 1,843 1,819 1,854

Earnings per common share

$ .78 $ .76 $ 2.30 $ 2.26

Diluted earnings per common share

$ .78 $ .76 $ 2.29 $ 2.25

(a) Represents stock issuance costs originally recorded in capital surplus upon the issuance of the Company’s Series D Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock that were reclassified to retained earnings on the redemption date.

Options outstanding at September 30, 2013, to purchase 9 million common shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, because they were antidilutive.

Note 11 Employee Benefits

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s retirement plans were:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Postretirement Postretirement
Pension Plans Welfare Plan Pension Plans Welfare Plan
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013

Service cost

$ 38 $ 42 $ $ 1 $ 114 $ 126 $ $ 3

Interest cost

50 43 1 1 148 128 3 3

Expected return on plan assets

(51 ) (44 ) (1 ) (155 ) (132 ) (1 ) (1 )

Prior service cost (credit) and transition obligation (asset) amortization

(2 ) (1 ) (1 ) (4 ) (4 ) (3 )

Actuarial loss (gain) amortization

39 66 (1 ) (3 ) 118 198 (4 ) (8 )

Net periodic benefit cost

$ 74 $ 106 $ (2 ) $ (1 ) $ 221 $ 316 $ (5 ) $ (3 )

Note 12 Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense were:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Federal

Current

$ 423 $ 390 $ 1,334 $ 1,506

Deferred

10 57 (19 ) (35 )

Federal income tax

433 447 1,315 1,471

State

Current

101 84 268 161

Deferred

(11 ) 11 (17 ) (3 )

State income tax

90 95 251 158

Total income tax provision

$ 523 $ 542 $ 1,566 $ 1,629

U.S. Bancorp

61


Table of Contents

A reconciliation of expected income tax expense at the federal statutory rate of 35 percent to the Company’s applicable income tax expense follows:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Tax at statutory rate

$ 704 $ 690 $ 2,091 $ 2,061

State income tax, at statutory rates, net of federal tax benefit

62 62 163 102

Tax effect of

Tax credits and benefits, net of related expenses

(186 ) (176 ) (535 ) (394 )

Tax-exempt income

(51 ) (52 ) (154 ) (159 )

Noncontrolling interests

(5 ) 13 (15 ) 42

Other items

(1 ) 5 16 (23 )

Applicable income taxes

$ 523 $ 542 $ 1,566 $ 1,629

The Company’s income tax returns are subject to review and examination by federal, state, local and foreign government authorities. On an ongoing basis, numerous federal, state, local and foreign examinations are in progress and cover multiple tax years. As of September 30, 2014, the federal taxing authority has completed its examination of the Company through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The years open to examination by foreign, state and local government authorities vary by jurisdiction.

The Company’s net deferred tax liability was $1.8 billion at September 30, 2014, and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2013.

Note 13 Derivative Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage various risks and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers. The Company recognizes all derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value in other assets or in other liabilities. On the date the Company enters into a derivative contract, the derivative is designated as either a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability (“fair value hedge”); a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”); a hedge of the volatility of an investment in foreign operations driven by changes in foreign currency exchange rates (“net investment hedge”); or a designation is not made as it is a customer-related transaction, an economic hedge for asset/liability risk management purposes or another stand-alone derivative created through the Company’s operations (“free-standing derivative”). When a derivative is designated as a fair value, cash flow or net investment hedge, the Company performs an assessment, at inception and, at a minimum, quarterly thereafter, to determine the effectiveness of the derivative in offsetting changes in the value or cash flows of the hedged item(s).

Fair Value Hedges These derivatives are interest rate swaps the Company uses to hedge the change in fair value related to interest rate changes of its underlying fixed-rate debt. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges, and changes in the fair value of the hedged items, are recorded in earnings. All fair value hedges were highly effective for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and the change in fair value attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was not material.

Cash Flow Hedges These derivatives are interest rate swaps the Company uses to hedge the forecasted cash flows from its underlying variable-rate loans and debt. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) until the cash flows of the hedged items are realized. If a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge is terminated or ceases to be highly effective, the gain or loss in other comprehensive income (loss) is amortized to earnings over the period the forecasted hedged transactions impact earnings. If a hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, hedge accounting is ceased and any gain or loss included in other comprehensive income (loss) is reported in earnings immediately, unless the forecasted transaction is at least reasonably possible of occurring, whereby the amounts remain within other comprehensive income (loss). At September 30, 2014, the Company had $187 million (net-of-tax) of realized and unrealized losses on derivatives classified as cash flow hedges recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), compared with $261 million (net-of-tax) at December 31, 2013. The estimated amount to be reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings during the remainder of 2014 and the next 12 months are losses of $31 million (net-of-tax) and $121 million (net-of-tax), respectively. These

62 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

amounts include gains and losses related to hedges that were terminated early for which the forecasted transactions are still probable. All cash flow hedges were highly effective for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and the change in fair value attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was not material.

Net Investment Hedges The Company uses forward commitments to sell specified amounts of certain foreign currencies, and occasionally non-derivative debt instruments, to hedge the volatility of its investment in foreign operations driven by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The ineffectiveness on all net investment hedges was not material for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. There were no non-derivative debt instruments designated as net investment hedges at September 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

Other Derivative Positions The Company enters into free-standing derivatives to mitigate interest rate risk and for other risk management purposes. These derivatives include forward commitments to sell to-be-announced securities (“TBAs”) and other commitments to sell residential mortgage loans, which are used to economically hedge the interest rate risk related to residential mortgage loans held for sale (“MLHFS”) and unfunded mortgage loan commitments. The Company also enters into interest rate swaps, forward commitments to buy TBAs, U.S. Treasury futures and options on U.S. Treasury futures to economically hedge the change in the fair value of the Company’s MSRs. The Company also enters into foreign currency forwards to economically hedge remeasurement gains and losses the Company recognizes on foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange contracts for its customers. To mitigate the market and liquidity risk associated with these customer derivatives, the Company historically has entered into similar offsetting positions with broker-dealers. In 2014, the Company began to actively manage the risks from its exposure to customer-related interest rate positions on a portfolio basis by entering into other derivative or non-derivative financial instruments that partially or fully offset the exposure from these customer-related positions. The Company’s customer derivatives and related hedges are monitored and reviewed by the Company’s Market Risk Committee, which establishes policies for market risk management, including exposure limits for each portfolio. The Company also has derivative contracts that are created through its operations, including commitments to originate MLHFS and swap agreements related to the sale of a portion of its Class B common shares of Visa Inc. Refer to Note 16 for further information on the Visa restructuring and related card association litigation.

For additional information on the Company’s purpose for entering into derivative transactions and its overall risk management strategies, refer to “Management Discussion and Analysis — Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate and Other Risks” which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

U.S. Bancorp

63


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the asset and liability management derivative positions of the Company:

Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
(Dollars in Millions) Notional
Value
Fair
Value

Weighted-

Average
Remaining
Maturity

In Years

Notional
Value
Fair
Value

Weighted-

Average
Remaining
Maturity

In Years

September 30, 2014

Fair value hedges

Interest rate contracts

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

$ 1,750 $ 21 3.65 $ 1,000 $ 4 9.96

Cash flow hedges

Interest rate contracts

Pay fixed/receive floating swaps

1,972 15 3.73 4,084 351 1.81

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

5,500 6 .15

Net investment hedges

Foreign exchange forward contracts

1,043 29 .05

Other economic hedges

Interest rate contracts

Futures and forwards

Buy

2,981 20 .09 1,422 4 .05

Sell

2,691 10 .10 4,077 22 .11

Options

Purchased

2,100 .07

Written

2,349 32 .08 8 1 .08

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

3,375 6 10.22 232 3 10.22

Pay fixed/receive floating swaps

55 10.22

Foreign exchange forward contracts

1,049 11 .02 3,576 38 .01

Equity contracts

27 1.13 57 1 .72

Credit contracts

1,263 3 3.40 2,288 5 3.04

Other (a)

722 15 .01 1,017 51 1.17

Total

$ 26,822 $ 168 $ 17,816 $ 480

December 31, 2013

Fair value hedges

Interest rate contracts

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

$ 500 $ 22 2.09 $ $

Cash flow hedges

Interest rate contracts

Pay fixed/receive floating swaps

772 26 6.25 4,288 498 2.46

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

7,000 26 .84

Net investment hedges

Foreign exchange forward contracts

1,056 4 .04

Other economic hedges

Interest rate contracts

Futures and forwards

Buy

2,310 9 .07 1,025 7 .06

Sell

5,234 58 .08 346 4 .17

Options

Purchased

2,300 .07

Written

1,902 17 .07 2 .08

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

3,540 56 10.22

Foreign exchange forward contracts

6,813 24 .02 2,121 4 .02

Equity contracts

79 3 1.62

Credit contracts

1,209 4 4.04 2,352 7 3.08

Total

$ 28,119 $ 189 $ 14,730 $ 580

(a) Includes short-term underwriting purchase and sale commitments with total asset and liability notional values of $722 million at September 30, 2014, and derivative liability swap agreements related to the sale of a portion of the Company’s Class B common shares of Visa Inc. These swap agreements had a total notional value, fair value and weighted average remaining maturity of $295 million, $42 million and 4.01 years at September 30, 2014, respectively.

64 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the customer-related derivative positions of the Company:

Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
(Dollars in Millions) Notional
Value
Fair
Value

Weighted-

Average
Remaining
Maturity

In Years

Notional
Value
Fair
Value

Weighted-

Average
Remaining
Maturity

In Years

September 30, 2014

Interest rate contracts

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

$ 16,055 $ 645 5.94 $ 8,509 $ 47 4.33

Pay fixed/receive floating swaps

7,215 54 3.98 16,384 638 5.86

Options

Purchased

4,110 10 3.84 24 2.67

Written

24 2.67 4,096 10 3.85

Futures

Buy

2,439 .25

Sell

334 1.28 131 .96

Foreign exchange rate contracts

Forwards, spots and swaps

13,349 595 .55 13,212 575 .55

Options

Purchased

751 22 .57

Written

751 22 .57

Total

$ 44,277 $ 1,326 $ 43,107 $ 1,292

December 31, 2013

Interest rate contracts

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

$ 11,717 $ 600 5.11 $ 7,291 $ 106 5.57

Pay fixed/receive floating swaps

6,746 114 6.03 12,361 560 4.90

Options

Purchased

3,489 33 4.53

Written

3,489 33 4.53

Foreign exchange rate contracts

Forwards, spots and swaps

10,970 457 .59 9,975 427 .62

Options

Purchased

364 11 .53

Written

364 11 .53

Total

$ 33,286 $ 1,215 $ 33,480 $ 1,137

U.S. Bancorp

65


Table of Contents

The table below shows the effective portion of the gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and the gains (losses) reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings (net-of-tax):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,

Gains (Losses)
Recognized in

Other Comprehensive

Income
(Loss)

Gains (Losses)
Reclassified from

Other Comprehensive

Income
(Loss) into Earnings

Gains (Losses)
Recognized in

Other Comprehensive

Income
(Loss)

Gains (Losses)
Reclassified from

Other Comprehensive

Income
(Loss) into Earnings

(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013

Asset and Liability Management Positions

Cash flow hedges

Interest rate contracts (a)

$ 10 $ (11 ) $ (28 ) $ (30 ) $ (12 ) $ 22 $ (86 ) $ (88 )

Net investment hedges

Foreign exchange forward contracts

$ 84 (29 ) $ 93 (23 )

Note: Ineffectiveness on cash flow and net investment hedges was not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

(a) Gains (Losses) reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into interest income on loans and interest expense on long-term debt.

The table below shows the gains (losses) recognized in earnings for fair value hedges, other economic hedges and the customer-related positions:

Location of

Gains (Losses)

Three Months Nine Months
Ended September 30, Ended September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) Recognized in Earnings 2014 2013 2014 2013

Asset and Liability Management Positions

Fair value hedges (a)

Interest rate contracts

Other noninterest income $ (19 ) $ $ (13 ) $ (7 )

Other economic hedges

Interest rate contracts

Futures and forwards

Mortgage banking revenue 6 33 (69 ) 569

Purchased and written options

Mortgage banking revenue 64 54 210 200

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

Mortgage banking revenue 17 (5 ) 238 (264 )

Foreign exchange forward contracts

Commercial products revenue (24 ) (16 ) (41 ) 18

Equity contracts

Compensation expense 1 1

Credit contracts

Other noninterest income/expense 2 1

Other

Other noninterest income/expense 1 (42 )

Customer-Related Positions

Interest rate contracts

Receive fixed/pay floating swaps

Other noninterest income (20 ) 13 329 (288 )

Pay fixed/receive floating swaps

Other noninterest income 28 (10 ) (307 ) 298

Foreign exchange rate contracts

Forwards, spots and swaps

Commercial products revenue 13 15 45 36

(a) Gains (Losses) on items hedged by interest rate contracts included in noninterest income (expense), were $19 million and zero million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $13 million and $7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The ineffective portion was immaterial for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Derivatives are subject to credit risk associated with counterparties to the derivative contracts. The Company measures that credit risk using a credit valuation adjustment and includes it within the fair value of the derivative. The Company manages counterparty credit risk through diversification of its derivative positions among various counterparties, by entering into master netting arrangements and, where possible, by requiring collateral arrangements. A master netting arrangement allows two counterparties, who have multiple derivative contracts with each other, the ability to net settle amounts under all contracts, including any related collateral, through a single payment and in a single currency. Collateral arrangements require the counterparty to deliver collateral (typically cash or U.S. Treasury and agency securities) equal to the Company’s net derivative receivable, subject to minimum transfer and credit rating requirements.

The Company’s collateral arrangements are predominately bilateral and, therefore, contain provisions that require collateralization of the Company’s net liability derivative positions. Required collateral coverage is based on certain net liability thresholds and contingent upon the Company’s credit rating from two of the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. If the Company’s credit rating were to fall below credit ratings thresholds established in the collateral arrangements, the counterparties to the derivatives could request immediate additional collateral coverage up to and including full collateral coverage for derivatives in a net liability position. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives under collateral arrangements that were in a net liability position at September 30, 2014, was $868 million. At September 30, 2014, the Company had $697 million of cash posted as collateral against this net liability position.

66 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents
Note 14 Netting Arrangements for Certain Financial Instruments

The majority of the Company’s derivative portfolio consists of bilateral over-the-counter trades. However, per current regulations, certain interest rate swaps and forwards and credit contracts need to be centrally cleared through clearinghouses. In addition, a portion of the Company’s derivative positions are exchange-traded. These are predominately U.S. Treasury futures or options on U.S. Treasury futures. Of the Company’s $132.0 billion total notional amount of derivative positions at September 30, 2014, $27.6 billion related to those centrally cleared through clearinghouses and $3.3 billion related to those that were exchange-traded. Irrespective of how derivatives are traded, the Company’s derivative contracts include offsetting rights (referred to as netting arrangements), and depending on expected volume, credit risk, and counterparty preference, collateral maintenance may be required. For all derivatives under collateral support agreements, fair value is determined daily and, depending on the collateral maintenance requirements, the Company and a counterparty may receive or deliver collateral, based upon the net fair value of all derivative positions between the Company and the counterparty. Collateral is typically cash, but securities may be allowed under collateral arrangements with certain counterparties. Receivables and payables related to cash collateral are included in other assets and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, along with the related derivative asset and liability fair values. Any securities pledged to counterparties as collateral remain on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Securities received from counterparties as collateral are not recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, unless the counterparty defaults. In general, securities used as collateral can be sold, repledged or otherwise used by the party in possession. No restrictions exist on the use of cash collateral by either party. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion of the Company’s derivatives, including collateral arrangements.

As part of the Company’s treasury and broker-dealer operations, the Company executes transactions that are treated as securities sold under agreements to repurchase or securities purchased under agreements to resell, both of which are accounted for as collateralized financings. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase include repurchase agreements and securities loaned transactions. Securities purchased under agreements to resell include reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed transactions. For securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the Company records a liability for the cash received, which is included in short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For securities purchased under agreements to resell, the Company records a receivable for the cash paid, which is included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Securities transferred to counterparties under repurchase agreements and securities loaned transactions continue to be recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, are measured at fair value, and are included in investment securities or other assets. Securities received from counterparties under reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed transactions are not recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet unless the counterparty defaults. In connection with all of these transactions, the fair values of the securities are determined daily, and additional cash is obtained or refunded to counterparties where appropriate. The securities transferred under repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions typically are U.S. Treasury securities or agency mortgage-backed securities. The securities loaned or borrowed typically are high-grade corporate bonds traded by the Company’s broker-dealer. In general, the securities transferred can be sold, repledged or otherwise used by the party in possession. No restrictions exist on the use of cash collateral by either party.

The Company executes its derivative, repurchase/reverse repurchase and securities loaned/borrowed transactions under the respective industry standard agreements. These agreements include master netting arrangements that allow for multiple contracts executed with the same counterparty to be viewed as a single arrangement. This allows for net settlement of a single amount on a daily basis. In the event of default, the master netting arrangement provides for close-out netting, which allows all of these positions with the defaulting counterparty to be terminated and net settled with a single payment amount.

The Company has elected to offset the assets and liabilities under netting arrangements for the balance sheet presentation of the majority of its derivative counterparties, excluding centrally cleared derivative contracts due to current uncertainty about the legal enforceability of netting arrangements with the clearinghouses. The netting occurs at the counterparty level, and includes all assets and liabilities related to the derivative contracts, including those associated with cash collateral received or delivered. The Company has not elected to offset the assets and liabilities under netting arrangements for the balance sheet presentation of repurchase/reverse repurchase and securities loaned/borrowed transactions.

U.S. Bancorp

67


Table of Contents

The following tables provide information on the Company’s netting adjustments, and items not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but available for offset in the event of default:

Gross
Recognized

Assets

Gross Amounts
Offset on the
Consolidated

Balance Sheet (a)

Net Amounts
Presented on the
Consolidated

Balance Sheet

Gross Amounts Not Offset on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Dollars in Millions)

Financial

Instruments (b)

Collateral

Received (c)

Net Amount

September 30, 2014

Derivative assets (d)

$ 1,363 $ (670 ) $ 693 $ (36 ) $ $ 657

Reverse repurchase agreements

107 107 (56 ) (51 )

Securities borrowed

583 583 (14 ) (551 ) 18

Total

$ 2,053 $ (670 ) $ 1,383 $ (106 ) $ (602 ) $ 675

December 31, 2013

Derivative assets (d)

$ 1,349 $ (599 ) $ 750 $ (21 ) $ $ 729

Reverse repurchase agreements

87 87 (59 ) (28 )

Securities borrowed

723 723 (698 ) 25

Total

$ 2,159 $ (599 ) $ 1,560 $ (80 ) $ (726 ) $ 754

(a) Includes $156 million and $124 million of cash collateral related payables that were netted against derivative assets at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
(b) For derivative assets this includes any derivative liability fair values that could be offset in the event of counterparty default; for reverse repurchase agreements this includes any repurchase agreement payables that could be offset in the event of counterparty default; for securities borrowed this includes any securities loaned payables that could be offset in the event of counterparty default.
(c) Includes the fair value of securities received by the Company from the counterparty. These securities are not included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet unless the counterparty defaults.
(d) Excludes $131 million and $55 million of derivative assets centrally cleared or otherwise not subject to netting arrangements at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Gross
Recognized

Liabilities

Gross Amounts
Offset on the
Consolidated

Balance Sheet (a)

Net Amounts
Presented on the
Consolidated

Balance Sheet

Gross Amounts Not Offset on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Dollars in Millions) Financial
Instruments (b)
Collateral
Pledged (c)
Net
Amount

September 30, 2014

Derivative liabilities (d)

$ 1,569 $ (1,127 ) $ 442 $ (36 ) $ $ 406

Repurchase agreements

686 686 (56 ) (630 )

Securities loaned

87 87 (14 ) (72 ) 1

Total

$ 2,342 $ (1,127 ) $ 1.215 $ (106 ) $ (702 ) $ 407

December 31, 2013

Derivative liabilities (d)

$ 1,598 $ (1,192 ) $ 406 $ (21 ) $ $ 385

Repurchase agreements

2,059 2,059 (59 ) (2,000 )

Securities loaned

Total

$ 3,657 $ (1,192 ) $ 2,465 $ (80 ) $ (2,000 ) $ 385

(a) Includes $613 million and $717 million of cash collateral related receivables that were netted against derivative liabilities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
(b) For derivative liabilities this includes any derivative asset fair values that could be offset in the event of counterparty default; for repurchase agreements this includes any reverse repurchase agreement receivables that could be offset in the event of counterparty default; for securities loaned this includes any securities borrowed receivables that could be offset in the event of counterparty default.
(c) Includes the fair value of securities pledged by the Company to the counterparty. These securities are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet unless the Company defaults.
(d) Excludes $203 million and $119 million of derivative liabilities centrally cleared or otherwise not subject to netting arrangements at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Note 15 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

The Company uses fair value measurements for the initial recording of certain assets and liabilities, periodic remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities, and disclosures. Derivatives, trading and available-for-sale investment securities, MSRs and substantially all MLHFS are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or impairment write-downs of individual assets.

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value measurement reflects all of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of nonperformance.

68 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The Company groups its assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy for valuation techniques used to measure financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. This hierarchy is based on whether the valuation inputs are observable or unobservable. These levels are:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 includes U.S. Treasury and exchange-traded instruments.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes debt securities that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and which are typically valued using third party pricing services; derivative contracts and other assets and liabilities, including securities, whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data; and MLHFS whose values are determined using quoted prices for similar assets or pricing models with inputs that are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category includes MSRs, certain debt securities and certain derivative contracts.

When the Company changes its valuation inputs for measuring financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, either due to changes in current market conditions or other factors, it may need to transfer those assets or liabilities to another level in the hierarchy based on the new inputs used. The Company recognizes these transfers at the end of the reporting period in which the transfers occur. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no transfers of financial assets or financial liabilities between the hierarchy levels.

The Company has processes and controls in place to increase the reliability of estimates it makes in determining fair value measurements. Items quoted on an exchange are verified to the quoted price. Items provided by a third party pricing service are subject to price verification procedures as described in more detail in the specific valuation discussions below. For fair value measurements modeled internally, the Company’s valuation models are subject to the Company’s Model Risk Governance Policy and Program, as maintained by the Company’s risk management department. The purpose of model validation is to assess the accuracy of the models’ input, processing, and reporting components. All models are required to be independently reviewed and approved prior to being placed in use, and are subject to formal change control procedures. Under the Company’s Model Risk Governance Policy, models are required to be reviewed at least annually to ensure they are operating as intended. Inputs into the models are market observable inputs whenever available. When market observable inputs are not available, the inputs are developed based upon analysis of historical experience and evaluation of other relevant market data. Significant unobservable model inputs are subject to review by senior management in corporate functions, who are independent from the modeling. Significant unobservable model inputs are also compared to actual results, typically on a quarterly basis. Significant Level 3 fair value measurements are also subject to corporate-level review and are benchmarked to market transactions or other market data, when available. Additional discussion of processes and controls are provided in the valuation methodologies section that follows.

The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure financial assets and liabilities at fair value and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value as required under disclosure guidance related to the fair value of financial instruments. In addition, the following section includes an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified. Where appropriate, the description includes information about the valuation models and key inputs to those models. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no significant changes to the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure fair value.

Cash and Due From Banks The carrying value of cash and due from banks approximate fair value and are classified within Level 1. Fair value is provided for disclosure purposes only.

Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements The carrying value of federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements approximate fair value because of the relatively short time between the

U.S. Bancorp

69


Table of Contents

origination of the instrument and its expected realization and are classified within Level 2. Fair value is provided for disclosure purposes only.

Investment Securities When quoted market prices for identical securities are available in an active market, these prices are used to determine fair value and these securities are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investment securities are predominantly U.S. Treasury securities.

For other securities, quoted market prices may not be readily available for the specific securities. When possible, the Company determines fair value based on market observable information, including quoted market prices for similar securities, inactive transaction prices, and broker quotes. These securities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 valuations are generally provided by a third party pricing service. The Company reviews the valuation methodologies utilized by the pricing service and, on a quarterly basis, reviews the security level prices provided by the pricing service against management’s expectation of fair value, based on changes in various benchmarks and market knowledge from recent trading activity. Additionally, each quarter, the Company validates the fair value provided by the pricing services by comparing them to recent observable market trades (where available), broker provided quotes, or other independent secondary pricing sources. Prices obtained from the pricing service are adjusted if they are found to be inconsistent with observable market data. Level 2 investment securities are predominantly agency mortgage-backed securities, certain other asset-backed securities, municipal securities, corporate debt securities, agency debt securities and perpetual preferred securities.

The fair value of securities for which there are no market trades, or where trading is inactive as compared to normal market activity, are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company determines the fair value of these securities by using a discounted cash flow methodology and incorporating observable market information, where available. These valuations are modeled by a unit within the Company’s treasury department. The valuations use assumptions regarding housing prices, interest rates and borrower performance. Inputs are refined and updated at least quarterly to reflect market developments and actual performance. The primary valuation drivers of these securities are the prepayment rates, default rates and default severities associated with the underlying collateral, as well as the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the projected cash flows. Level 3 fair values, including the assumptions used, are subject to review by senior management in corporate functions, who are independent from the modeling. The fair value measurements are also compared to fair values provided by third party pricing services, where available. Securities classified within Level 3 include non-agency mortgage-backed securities, non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, certain asset-backed securities, certain collateralized debt obligations and collateralized loan obligations and certain corporate debt securities.

Mortgage Loans Held For Sale MLHFS measured at fair value, for which an active secondary market and readily available market prices exist, are initially valued at the transaction price and are subsequently valued by comparison to instruments with similar collateral and risk profiles. MLHFS are classified within Level 2. Included in mortgage banking revenue was a $4 million net gain and a $5 million net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and a $102 million net gain and a $326 million net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from the changes to fair value of these MLHFS under fair value option accounting guidance. Changes in fair value due to instrument specific credit risk were immaterial. Interest income for MLHFS is measured based on contractual interest rates and reported as interest income on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Electing to measure MLHFS at fair value reduces certain timing differences and better matches changes in fair value of these assets with changes in the value of the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting.

Loans The loan portfolio includes adjustable and fixed-rate loans, the fair value of which is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and other valuation techniques. The expected cash flows of loans consider historical prepayment experiences and estimated credit losses and are discounted using current rates offered to borrowers with similar credit characteristics. Generally, loan fair values reflect Level 3 information. Fair value is provided for disclosure purposes only, with the exception of impaired collateral-based loans that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis utilizing the underlying collateral fair value.

Mortgage Servicing Rights MSRs are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology. Accordingly, MSRs are classified within Level 3. The Company determines fair value by estimating the present value of the asset’s future cash flows using prepayment rates, discount rates, and other assumptions. The MSR valuations, as well as the assumptions used, are developed by the mortgage banking division and are subject to review by senior management in corporate

70 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

functions, who are independent from the modeling. The MSR valuations and assumptions are validated through comparison to trade information, publicly available data and industry surveys when available, and are also compared to independent third party valuations each quarter. Risks inherent in MSR valuation include higher than expected prepayment rates and/or delayed receipt of cash flows. There is minimal observable market activity for MSRs on comparable portfolios, and, therefore the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment. Refer to Note 7 for further information on MSR valuation assumptions.

Derivatives The majority of derivatives held by the Company are executed over-the-counter and are valued using standard cash flow, Black-Derman-Toy and Monte Carlo valuation techniques. The models incorporate inputs, depending on the type of derivative, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates and volatility. In addition, all derivative values incorporate an assessment of the risk of counterparty nonperformance, measured based on the Company’s evaluation of credit risk as well as external assessments of credit risk, where available. The Company monitors and manages its nonperformance risk by considering its ability to net derivative positions under master netting arrangements, as well as collateral received or provided under collateral arrangements. Accordingly, the Company has elected to measure the fair value of derivatives, at a counterparty level, on a net basis. The majority of the derivatives are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as the significant inputs to the models, including nonperformance risk, are observable. However, certain derivative transactions are with counterparties where risk of nonperformance cannot be observed in the market, and therefore the credit valuation adjustments result in these derivatives being classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The credit valuation adjustments for nonperformance risk are determined by the Company’s treasury department using credit assumptions provided by the risk management department. The credit assumptions are compared to actual results quarterly and are recalibrated as appropriate.

The Company also has other derivative contracts that are created through its operations, including commitments to purchase and originate mortgage loans and swap agreements executed in conjunction with the sale of a portion of its Class B common shares of Visa Inc. (“the Visa swaps”). Refer to Note 16 for further information on the Visa restructuring and related card association litigation. The mortgage loan commitments are valued by pricing models that include market observable and unobservable inputs, which result in the commitments being classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The unobservable inputs include assumptions about the percentage of commitments that actually become a closed loan and the MSR value that is inherent in the underlying loan value, both of which are developed by the Company’s mortgage banking division. The closed loan percentages for the mortgage loan commitments are monitored on an on-going basis, as these percentages are also used for the Company’s economic hedging activities. The inherent MSR value for the commitments are generated by the same models used for the Company’s MSRs and thus are subject to the same processes and controls as described for the MSRs above. The Visa swaps require payments by either the Company or the purchaser of the Visa Inc. Class B common shares when there are changes in the conversion rate of the Visa Inc. Class B common shares to Visa Inc. Class A common shares, as well as quarterly payments to the purchaser based on specified terms of the agreements. The fair value of the Visa swaps are calculated using a discounted cash flow methodology which includes unobservable inputs about the timing and settlement amounts related to the resolution of certain Visa related litigation, as the expected litigation resolution impacts the Visa Inc. Class B common share to Visa Inc. Class A common share conversion rate, as well as the ultimate termination date for the Visa swaps. Accordingly, the Visa swaps are classified within Level 3. The Company’s corporate development department determines the valuation for the Visa swaps. Management reviews and updates the Visa swaps fair value in conjunction with its review of Visa related litigation contingencies, and the associated escrow funding.

Other Financial Instruments Other financial instruments include cost method equity investments and certain community development and tax-advantaged related assets and liabilities. The majority of the Company’s cost method equity investments are in Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, for which the carrying amounts approximate fair value and are classified within Level 2. Investments in private equity and other limited partnership funds are estimated using fund provided net asset values. These equity investments are classified within Level 3. The community development and tax-advantaged related asset balances primarily represent the underlying assets of consolidated community development and tax-advantaged entities. The community development and tax-advantaged related liabilities represent the underlying liabilities of the consolidated entities (included in long-term debt) and liabilities related to other third party interests (included in other liabilities). The carrying value of the community development and tax-advantaged related asset and other liability balances are a reasonable estimate of fair value and

U.S. Bancorp

71


Table of Contents

are classified within Level 3. Refer to Note 6 for further information on community development and tax-advantaged related assets and liabilities. Fair value is provided for disclosure purposes only.

Deposit Liabilities The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit was estimated by discounting the contractual cash flow using current market rates. Deposit liabilities are classified within Level 2. Fair value is provided for disclosure purposes only.

Short-term Borrowings Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper and other short-term funds borrowed have floating rates or short-term maturities. The fair value of short-term borrowings was determined by discounting contractual cash flows using current market rates. Short-term borrowings are classified within Level 2. Included in short-term borrowings is the Company’s obligation on securities sold short, which is required to be accounted for at fair value per applicable accounting guidance. Fair value for other short-term borrowings is provided for disclosure purposes only.

Long-term Debt The fair value for most long-term debt was determined by discounting contractual cash flows using current market rates. Junior subordinated debt instruments were valued using market quotes. Long-term debt is classified within Level 2. Fair value is provided for disclosure purposes only.

Loan Commitments, Letters of Credit and Guarantees The fair value of commitments, letters of credit and guarantees represents the estimated costs to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with a third party. Other loan commitments, letters of credit and guarantees are not actively traded, and the Company estimates their fair value based on the related amount of unamortized deferred commitment fees adjusted for the probable losses for these arrangements. These arrangements are classified within Level 3. Fair value is provided for disclosure purposes only.

Significant Unobservable Inputs of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities

The following section provides information on the significant inputs used by the Company to determine the fair value measurements of Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, the following section includes a discussion of the sensitivity of the fair value measurements to changes in the significant inputs and a description of any interrelationships between these inputs for Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The discussion below excludes nonrecurring fair value measurements of collateral value used for impairment measures for loans and other real estate owned. These valuations utilize third party appraisal or broker price opinions, and are classified as Level 3 due to the significant judgment involved.

Available-For-Sale Investment Securities The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s modeled Level 3 available-for-sale investment securities are prepayment rates, probability of default and loss severities associated with the underlying collateral, as well as the discount margin used to calculate the present value of the projected cash flows. Increases in prepayment rates for Level 3 securities will typically result in higher fair values, as increased prepayment rates accelerate the receipt of expected cash flows and reduce exposure to credit losses. Increases in the probability of default and loss severities will result in lower fair values, as these increases reduce expected cash flows. Discount margin is the Company’s estimate of the current market spread above the respective benchmark rate. Higher discount margin will result in lower fair values, as it reduces the present value of the expected cash flows.

Prepayment rates generally move in the opposite direction of market interest rates. In the current environment, an increase in the probability of default will generally be accompanied with an increase in loss severity, as both are impacted by underlying collateral values. Discount margins are influenced by market expectations about the security’s collateral performance, and therefore may directionally move with probability and severity of default; however, discount margins are also impacted by broader market forces, such as competing investment yields, sector liquidity, economic news, and other macroeconomic factors.

72 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The following table shows the significant valuation assumption ranges for Level 3 available-for-sale investment securities at September 30, 2014:

Minimum Maximum Average

Residential Prime Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (a)

Estimated lifetime prepayment rates

6 % 20 % 14 %

Lifetime probability of default rates

8 4

Lifetime loss severity rates

15 75 36

Discount margin

2 4 3

Residential Non-Prime Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (b)

Estimated lifetime prepayment rates

3 % 10 % 6 %

Lifetime probability of default rates

4 14 8

Lifetime loss severity rates

20 70 53

Discount margin

1 5 2

Other Asset-Backed Securities

Estimated lifetime prepayment rates

6 % 6 % 6 %

Lifetime probability of default rates

5 5 5

Lifetime loss severity rates

40 40 40

Discount margin

6 6 6

(a) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads).
(b) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.

Mortgage Servicing Rights The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s MSRs are expected prepayments and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the projected cash flows. Significant increases in either of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Significant decreases in either of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher fair value measurement. There is no direct interrelationship between prepayments and discount rate. Prepayment rates generally move in the opposite direction of market interest rates. Discount rates are generally impacted by changes in market return requirements.

The following table shows the significant valuation assumption ranges for MSRs at September 30, 2014:

Minimum Maximum Average

Expected prepayment

10 % 20 % 11 %

Discount rate

9 13 10

Derivatives The Company has two distinct Level 3 derivative portfolios: (i) the Company’s commitments to purchase and originate mortgage loans that meet the requirements of a derivative and (ii) the Company’s asset/liability and customer-related derivatives that are Level 3 due to unobservable inputs related to measurement of risk of nonperformance by the counterparty. In addition, the Company’s Visa swaps are classified within Level 3.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s derivative commitments to purchase and originate mortgage loans are the percentage of commitments that actually become a closed loan and the MSR value that is inherent in the underlying loan value. A significant increase in the rate of loans that close would result in a larger derivative asset or liability. A significant increase in the inherent MSR value would result in an increase in the derivative asset or a reduction in the derivative liability. Expected loan close rates and the inherent MSR values are directly impacted by changes in market rates and will generally move in the same direction as interest rates.

The following table shows the significant valuation assumption ranges for the Company’s derivative commitments to purchase and originate mortgage loans at September 30, 2014:

Minimum Maximum Average

Expected loan close rate

42 % 100 % 76 %

Inherent MSR value (basis points per loan)

48 214 129

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of certain of the Company’s asset/liability and customer-related derivatives is the credit valuation adjustment related to the risk of counterparty nonperformance. A significant increase in the credit valuation adjustment would result in a lower fair value measurement. A significant decrease in the credit valuation adjustment would result in a higher fair value measurement. The credit valuation adjustment is impacted by changes in the Company’s assessment of the counterparty’s credit position. At September 30, 2014, the minimum, maximum and average credit valuation adjustment as a percentage of the derivative contract fair value prior to adjustment was 0 percent, 93 percent and 7 percent, respectively.

U.S. Bancorp

73


Table of Contents

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Visa swaps are management’s estimate of the probability of certain litigation scenarios, and the timing of the resolution of the related litigation loss estimates in excess, or shortfall, of the Company’s proportional share of escrow funds. An increase in the loss estimate or a delay in the resolution of the related litigation would result in an increase in the derivative liability. A decrease in the loss estimate or an acceleration of the resolution of the related litigation would result in a decrease in the derivative liability.

The following table summarizes the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(Dollars in Millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Netting Total

September 30, 2014

Available-for-sale securities

U.S. Treasury and agencies

$ 1,345 $ 1,333 $ $ $ 2,678

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential

Agency

41,837 41,837

Non-agency

Prime (a)

426 426

Non-prime (b)

284 284

Commercial

Agency

122 122

Asset-backed securities

Collateralized debt obligations/Collateralized loan obligations

23 23

Other

558 64 622

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

5,563 5,563

Obligations of foreign governments

6 6

Corporate debt securities

630 9 639

Perpetual preferred securities

220 220

Other investments

235 19 254

Total available-for-sale

1,580 50,311 783 52,674

Mortgage loans held for sale

3,918 3,918

Mortgage servicing rights

2,461 2,461

Derivative assets

937 557 (670 ) 824

Other assets

157 1,026 1,183

Total

$ 1,737 $ 56,192 $ 3,801 $ (670 ) $ 61,060

Derivative liabilities

$ $ 1,680 $ 92 $ (1,127 ) $ 645

Short-term borrowings (c)

160 608 768

Total

$ 160 $ 2,288 $ 92 $ (1,127 ) $ 1,413

December 31, 2013

Available-for-sale securities

U.S. Treasury and agencies

$ 7 $ 1,038 $ $ $ 1,045

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential

Agency

31,553 31,553

Non-agency

Prime (a)

478 478

Non-prime (b)

297 297

Commercial

Agency

152 152

Asset-backed securities

Collateralized debt obligations/Collateralized loan obligations

24 24

Other

566 63 629

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

5,738 5,738

Obligations of foreign governments

6 6

Corporate debt securities

631 9 640

Perpetual preferred securities

212 212

Other investments

141 20 161

Total available-for-sale

148 39,940 847 40,935

Mortgage loans held for sale

3,263 3,263

Mortgage servicing rights

2,680 2,680

Derivative assets

889 515 (599 ) 805

Other assets

143 588 731

Total

$ 291 $ 44,680 $ 4,042 $ (599 ) $ 48,414

Derivative liabilities

$ $ 1,647 $ 70 $ (1,192 ) $ 525

Short-term borrowings (c)

112 551 663

Total

$ 112 $ 2,198 $ 70 $ (1,192 ) $ 1,188

(a) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads).
(b) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.
(c) Represents the Company’s obligation on securities sold short required to be accounted for at fair value per applicable accounting guidance.

74 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

The following table presents the changes in fair value for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended September 30:

(Dollars in Millions) Beginning
of Period
Balance
Net Gains
(Losses)
Included in
Net Income
Net Gains
(Losses)
Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Purchases Sales Principal
Payments
Issuances Settlements End
of Period
Balance

Net Change in

Unrealized Gains

(Losses) Relating
to Assets and
Liabilities
Still Held at
End of Period

2014

Available-for-sale securities

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential non-agency

Prime (a)

$ 447 $ $ 2 $ $ $ (23 ) $ $ $ 426 $ 2

Non-prime (b)

286 6 (8 ) 284 6

Asset-backed securities

Other

66 (2 ) 64

Corporate debt securities

9 9

Total available-for-sale

808 8 (e) (33 ) 783 8

Mortgage servicing rights

2,412 (61 ) (c) 1 109 (f) 2,461 (61 ) (c)

Net derivative assets and liabilities

558 95 (d) (1 ) (187 ) 465 (15 ) (g)

2013

Available-for-sale securities

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential non-agency

Prime (a)

$ 547 $ (2 ) $ (4 ) $ $ $ (41 ) $ $ $ 500 $ (4 )

Non-prime (b)

319 (3 ) (4 ) (9 ) 303 (4 )

Asset-backed securities

Other

40 1 (2 ) 3 (2 ) 40 (2 )

Corporate debt securities

9 9

Total available-for-sale

915 (4 ) (h) (10 ) (e) 3 (52 ) 852 (10 )

Mortgage servicing rights

2,377 11 (c) 2 187 (f) 2,577 11 (c)

Net derivative assets and liabilities

423 182 (i) (2 ) 14 617 55 (j)

(a) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads).
(b) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.
(c) Included in mortgage banking revenue.
(d) Approximately $7 million included in other noninterest income and $88 million included in mortgage banking revenue.
(e) Included in changes in unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale.
(f) Represents MSRs capitalized during the period.
(g) Approximately $(65) million included in other noninterest income and $50 million included in mortgage banking revenue.
(h) Approximately $(3) million included in securities gains (losses) and $(1) million included in interest income.
(i) Approximately $89 million included in other noninterest income and $93 million included in mortgage banking revenue.
(j) Approximately $(28) million included in other noninterest income and $83 million included in mortgage banking revenue.

U.S. Bancorp

75


Table of Contents

The following table presents the changes in fair value for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30:

(Dollars in Millions) Beginning
of Period
Balance
Net
Gains
(Losses)
Included
in Net
Income
Net Gains
(Losses)
Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Purchases Sales Principal
Payments
Issuances Settlements End
of Period
Balance

Net Change in

Unrealized Gains

(Losses) Relating
to Assets and
Liabilities
Still Held at
End of Period

2014

Available-for-sale securities

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential non-agency

Prime (a)

$ 478 $ $ 14 $ $ $ (66 ) $ $ $ 426 $ 14

Non-prime (b)

297 (4 ) 14 (23 ) 284 14

Asset-backed securities

Other

63 2 1 4 (6 ) 64 1

Corporate debt securities

9 9

Total available-for-sale

847 (2 ) (c) 29 (f) 4 (95 ) 783 29

Mortgage servicing rights

2,680 (345 ) (d) 3 (141 ) 264 (g) 2,461 (345 ) (d)

Net derivative assets and liabilities

445 568 (e) 1 (1 ) (548 ) 465 80 (h)

2013

Available-for-sale securities

Mortgage-backed securities

Residential non-agency

Prime (a)

$ 624 $ (6 ) $ 4 $ $ $ (122 ) $ $ $ 500 $ 4

Non-prime (b)

355 (11 ) 13 (20 ) (34 ) 303 14

Asset-backed securities

Other

15 2 (1 ) 28 (4 ) 40 (1 )

Corporate debt securities

9 9

Total available-for-sale

1,003 (15 ) (i) 16 (f) 28 (20 ) (160 ) 852 17

Mortgage servicing rights

1,700 196 (d) 7 674 (g) 2,577 196 (d)

Net derivative assets and liabilities

1,179 (34 ) (j) 1 (4 ) (525 ) 617 (218 ) (k)

(a) Prime securities are those designated as such by the issuer at origination. When an issuer designation is unavailable, the Company determines at acquisition date the categorization based on asset pool characteristics (such as weighted-average credit score, loan-to-value, loan type, prevalence of low documentation loans) and deal performance (such as pool delinquencies and security market spreads).
(b) Includes all securities not meeting the conditions to be designated as prime.
(c) Included in securities gains (losses).
(d) Included in mortgage banking revenue.
(e) Approximately $215 million included in other noninterest income and $353 million included in mortgage banking revenue.
(f) Included in changes in unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale.
(g) Represents MSRs capitalized during the period.
(h) Approximately $30 million included in other noninterest income and $50 million included in mortgage banking revenue.
(i) Approximately $(13) million included in securities gains (losses) and $(2) million included in interest income.
(j) Approximately $(122) million included in other noninterest income and $88 million included in mortgage banking revenue.
(k) Approximately $(301) million included in other noninterest income and $83 million included in mortgage banking revenue.

The Company is also required periodically to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These measurements of fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following table summarizes the balances of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(Dollars in Millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

Loans (a)

$ $ $ 142 $ 142 $ $ $ 128 $ 128

Other assets (b)

84 84 150 150

(a) Represents the carrying value of loans for which adjustments were based on the fair value of the collateral, excluding loans fully charged-off.
(b) Primarily represents the fair value of foreclosed properties that were measured at fair value based on an appraisal or broker price opinion of the collateral subsequent to their initial acquisition.

The following table summarizes losses recognized related to nonrecurring fair value measurements of individual assets or portfolios:

Three Months
Ended September 30,
Nine Months
Ended September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Loans (a)

$ 21 $ 22 $ 68 $ 55

Other assets (b)

17 14 51 73

(a) Represents write-downs of loans which were based on the fair value of the collateral, excluding loans fully charged-off.
(b) Primarily represents related losses of foreclosed properties that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial acquisition.

76 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Fair Value Option

The following table summarizes the differences between the aggregate fair value carrying amount of MLHFS for which the fair value option has been elected and the aggregate unpaid principal amount that the Company is contractually obligated to receive at maturity:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(Dollars in Millions) Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Aggregate
Unpaid
Principal
Carrying
Amount Over
(Under) Unpaid
Principal
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Aggregate
Unpaid
Principal
Carrying
Amount Over
(Under) Unpaid
Principal

Total loans

$ 3,918 $ 3,784 $ 134 $ 3,263 $ 3,195 $ 68

Nonaccrual loans

8 12 (4 ) 9 14 (5 )

Loans 90 days or more past due

2 2

Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value for financial instruments as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and includes financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value. In accordance with disclosure guidance related to fair values of financial instruments, the Company did not include assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments, such as the value of goodwill, long-term relationships with deposit, credit card, merchant processing and trust customers, other purchased intangibles, premises and equipment, deferred taxes and other liabilities. Additionally, in accordance with the disclosure guidance, insurance contracts and investments accounted for under the equity method are excluded.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are shown in the table below:

September 30, 2014 December 31, 2013

Carrying

Amount

Fair Value

Carrying

Amount

Fair Value
(Dollars in Millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

Financial Assets

Cash and due from banks

$ 6,183 $ 6,183 $ $ $ 6,183 $ 8,477 $ 8,477 $ $ $ 8,477

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements

168 168 168 163 163 163

Investment securities held-to-maturity

44,231 1,905 42,093 96 44,094 38,920 2,589 35,678 101 38,368

Loans held for sale (a)

21 21 21 5 5 5

Loans (b)

241,384 243,700 243,700 230,857 231,480 231,480

Other financial instruments

2,227 944 1,289 2,233 2,443 1,080 1,383 2,463

Financial Liabilities

Deposits

273,097 273,147 273,147 262,123 262,200 262,200

Short-term borrowings (c)

29,277 29,134 29,134 26,945 26,863 26,863

Long-term debt

30,768 31,220 31,220 20,049 20,391 20,391

Other liabilities

1,307 1,307 1,307 1,263 1,263 1,263

(a) Excludes mortgages held for sale for which the fair value option under applicable accounting guidance was elected.
(b) Excludes loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
(c) Excludes the Company’s obligation on securities sold short required to be accounted for at fair value per applicable accounting guidance.

The fair value of unfunded commitments, standby letters of credit and other guarantees is approximately equal to their carrying value. The carrying value of unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit was $433 million and $382 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The carrying value of other guarantees was $235 million and $278 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Note 16 Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

Visa Restructuring and Card Association Litigation The Company’s payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through the Visa U.S.A. Inc. card association or its affiliates (collectively “Visa”). In 2007, Visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of Visa Inc. common stock to its financial institution members in contemplation of its initial public offering (“IPO”) completed in the first quarter of 2008 (the “Visa Reorganization”). As a part of the Visa Reorganization, the Company received its proportionate number of shares of Visa Inc. common stock, which were subsequently converted to Class B shares of Visa Inc. (“Class B shares”). Visa U.S.A. Inc. (“Visa

U.S. Bancorp

77


Table of Contents

U.S.A.”) and MasterCard International (collectively, the “Card Associations”) are defendants in antitrust lawsuits challenging the practices of the Card Associations (the “Visa Litigation”). Visa U.S.A. member banks have a contingent obligation to indemnify Visa Inc. under the Visa U.S.A. bylaws (which were modified at the time of the restructuring in October 2007) for potential losses arising from the Visa Litigation. The indemnification by the Visa U.S.A. member banks has no specific maximum amount.

Using proceeds from its IPO and through reductions to the conversion ratio applicable to the Class B shares held by Visa U.S.A. member banks, Visa Inc. has funded an escrow account for the benefit of member financial institutions to fund their indemnification obligations associated with the Visa Litigation. The receivable related to the escrow account is classified in other liabilities as a direct offset to the related Visa Litigation contingent liability. On October 19, 2012, Visa signed a settlement agreement to resolve class action claims associated with the multi-district interchange litigation, the largest of the remaining Visa Litigation matters. The settlement has been approved by the court, but has been challenged by some class members and is being appealed. In addition, a number of class members opted out of the settlement and have filed actions against the Card Associations. At September 30, 2014, the carrying amount of the Company’s liability related to the Visa Litigation matters, net of its share of the escrow fundings, was $19 million. The Company sold 3.0 million and .4 million of its Class B shares during the second and third quarters of 2014, respectively. These sales do not impact the Company’s liability for the Visa Litigation matters or the receivable related to the escrow account. The remaining 9.2 million Class B shares held by the Company will be eligible for conversion to Class A shares of Visa Inc., and thereby become marketable, upon final settlement of the Visa Litigation. These shares are excluded from the Company’s financial instruments disclosures included in Note 15.

Other Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

The following table is a summary of other guarantees and contingent liabilities of the Company at September 30, 2014:

(Dollars in Millions) Collateral
Held
Carrying
Amount
Maximum
Potential
Future
Payments

Standby letters of credit

$ $ 63 $ 15,201

Third-party borrowing arrangements

16

Securities lending indemnifications

5,166 5,002

Asset sales

160 4,040 (a)

Merchant processing

780 66 92,835

Contingent consideration arrangements

2 2

Tender option bond program guarantee

4,079 3,915

Minimum revenue guarantees

7 7

Other

525

(a) The maximum potential future payments do not include loan sales where the Company provides standard representation and warranties to the buyer against losses related to loan underwriting documentation defects that may have existed at the time of sale that generally are identified after the occurrence of a triggering event such as delinquency. For these types of loan sales, the maximum potential future payments is generally the unpaid principal balance of loans sold measured at the end of the current reporting period. Actual losses will be significantly less than the maximum exposure, as only a fraction of loans sold will have a representation and warranty breach, and any losses on repurchase would generally be mitigated by any collateral held against the loans.

Merchant Processing The Company, through its subsidiaries, provides merchant processing services. Under the rules of credit card associations, a merchant processor retains a contingent liability for credit card transactions processed. This contingent liability arises in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder’s favor. In this situation, the transaction is “charged-back” to the merchant and the disputed amount is credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. If the Company is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder.

The Company currently processes card transactions in the United States, Canada, Europe, Mexico and Brazil through wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures with other financial institutions. In the event a merchant was unable to fulfill product or services subject to delayed delivery, such as airline tickets, the Company could become financially liable for refunding tickets purchased through the credit card associations under the charge-back provisions. Charge-back risk related to these merchants is evaluated in a manner similar to credit risk assessments and, as such, merchant processing contracts contain various provisions to protect the Company in the event of default. At September 30, 2014, the value of airline tickets purchased to be delivered at a future date was $6.8 billion. The Company held collateral of $648 million in escrow deposits, letters of credit and indemnities from financial institutions, and liens on various assets.

Asset Sales The Company regularly sells loans to GSEs as part of its mortgage banking activities. The Company provides customary representation and warranties to the GSEs in conjunction with these sales. These representations

78 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

and warranties generally require the Company to repurchase assets if it is subsequently determined that a loan did not meet specified criteria, such as a documentation deficiency or rescission of mortgage insurance. If the Company is unable to cure or refute a repurchase request, the Company is generally obligated to repurchase the loan or otherwise reimburse the counterparty for losses. At September 30, 2014, the Company had reserved $62 million for potential losses from representation and warranty obligations, compared with $83 million at December 31, 2013. The Company’s reserve reflects management’s best estimate of losses for representation and warranty obligations. The Company’s repurchase reserve is modeled at the loan level, taking into consideration the individual credit quality and borrower activity that has transpired since origination. The model applies credit quality and economic risk factors to derive a probability of default and potential repurchase that are based on the Company’s historical loss experience, and estimates loss severity based on expected collateral value. The Company also considers qualitative factors that may result in anticipated losses differing from historical loss trends.

The following table is a rollforward of the Company’s representation and warranty reserve:

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in Millions) 2014 2013 2014 2013

Balance at beginning of period

$ 69 $ 190 $ 83 $ 240

Net realized losses

(1 ) (13 ) (13 ) (52 )

Change in reserve

(6 ) (1 ) (8 ) (12 )

Balance at end of period

$ 62 $ 176 $ 62 $ 176

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had $29 million and $89 million, respectively, of unresolved representation and warranty claims from the GSEs. The Company does not have a significant amount of unresolved claims from investors other than the GSEs.

Litigation and Regulatory Matters The Company is subject to various litigation and regulatory matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Company establishes reserves for such matters when potential losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes the ultimate resolution of existing legal and regulatory matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. However, changes in circumstances or additional information could result in additional accruals or resolution in excess of established accruals, which could adversely affect the Company’s results from operations, potentially materially.

The Company is currently subject to investigations and examinations by government agencies and bank regulators concerning mortgage-related practices, including those related to compliance with selling guidelines relating to residential home loans sold to GSEs, foreclosure-related expenses submitted to the Federal Housing Administration or GSEs for reimbursement, and various practices related to lender-placed insurance. The Company is also regularly subject to examinations and inquiries in areas of increasing regulatory scrutiny, such as compliance, risk management, third party management, consumer protection, anti-money laundering and Office of Foreign Assets Control requirements. The Company is cooperating fully with these examinations, inquiries and investigations, any of which could lead to administrative or legal proceedings or settlements. Remedies in these proceedings or settlements may include fines, penalties, restitution or alterations in the Company’s business practices (which may increase the Company’s operating expenses).

Certain federal and state governmental authorities reached settlement agreements in 2012 and 2013 with other major financial institutions regarding their mortgage origination, servicing, and foreclosure activities. Those governmental authorities have had settlement discussions with other financial institutions, including the Company. The Company has not agreed to any settlement; however, if a settlement were reached it would likely include an agreement to comply with specified servicing standards, and settlement payments to governmental authorities as well as a monetary commitment that could be satisfied under various loan modification programs (in addition to the programs the Company already has in place).

Due to their complex nature, it can be years before litigation and regulatory matters are resolved. For those litigation and regulatory matters where the Company has information to develop an estimate or range of loss, the Company believes the upper end of reasonably possible losses in aggregate, in excess of any reserves established for matters where a loss is considered probable, will not be material to its financial statements. The Company’s estimates are subject to significant judgment and uncertainties, and the matters underlying the estimates will change from time to time. Actual results may vary significantly from the current estimates.

U.S. Bancorp

79


Table of Contents

For additional information on the nature of the Company’s guarantees and contingent liabilities, refer to Note 22 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Note 17 Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated the impact of events that have occurred subsequent to September 30, 2014 through the date the consolidated financial statements were filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on this evaluation, the Company has determined none of these events were required to be recognized or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and related notes.

80 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Daily Average Balance Sheet and Related Yields and Rates (a)

For the Three Months Ended September 30,
2014 2013

(Dollars in Millions)

(Unaudited)

Average
Balances
Interest Yields
and
Rates
Average
Balances
Interest Yields
and
Rates
% Change
Average
Balances

Assets

Investment securities

$ 93,141 $ 508 2.18 % $ 74,988 $ 453 2.42 % 24.2 %

Loans held for sale

3,552 36 4.08 4,965 46 3.77 (28.5 )

Loans (b)

Commercial

77,345 564 2.89 68,064 543 3.17 13.6

Commercial real estate

40,839 397 3.86 38,501 400 4.12 6.1

Residential mortgages

51,994 502 3.86 49,139 495 4.02 5.8

Credit card

17,753 467 10.45 16,931 429 10.06 4.9

Other retail

48,698 517 4.22 46,994 582 4.91 3.6

Total loans, excluding covered loans

236,629 2,447 4.11 219,629 2,449 4.43 7.7

Covered loans

7,238 96 5.31 9,733 143 5.84 (25.6 )

Total loans

243,867 2,543 4.15 229,362 2,592 4.49 6.3

Other earning assets

5,862 27 1.86 5,745 34 2.38 2.0

Total earning assets

346,422 3,114 3.58 315,060 3,125 3.95 10.0

Allowance for loan losses

(4,161 ) (4,322 ) 3.7

Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities

463 221 *

Other assets

43,099 41,202 4.6

Total assets

$ 385,823 $ 352,161 9.6

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Noninterest-bearing deposits

$ 74,126 $ 68,264 8.6 %

Interest-bearing deposits

Interest checking

54,454 9 .07 48,235 7 .07 12.9

Money market savings

66,250 31 .19 55,982 19 .14 18.3

Savings accounts

34,615 11 .13 32,083 12 .14 7.9

Time deposits less than $100,000

11,045 29 1.02 12,495 44 1.37 (11.6 )

Time deposits greater than $100,000

30,518 35 .45 35,309 52 .59 (13.6 )

Total interest-bearing deposits

196,882 115 .23 184,104 134 .29 6.9

Short-term borrowings

30,961 73 .94 27,495 99 1.42 12.6

Long-term debt

26,658 178 2.67 19,226 178 3.69 38.7

Total interest-bearing liabilities

254,501 366 .57 230,825 411 .71 10.3

Other liabilities

13,379 11,740 14.0

Shareholders’ equity

Preferred equity

4,756 4,756

Common equity

38,376 35,180 9.1

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity

43,132 39,936 8.0

Noncontrolling interests

685 1,396 (50.9 )

Total equity

43,817 41,332 6.0

Total liabilities and equity

$ 385,823 $ 352,161 9.6

Net interest income

$ 2,748 $ 2,714

Gross interest margin

3.01 % 3.24 %

Gross interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments

2.95 % 3.17 %

Percent of Earning Assets

Interest income

3.58 % 3.95 %

Interest expense

.42 .52

Net interest margin

3.16 % 3.43 %

Net interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments

3.10 % 3.36 %

* Not meaningful
(a) Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent.
(b) Interest income and rates on loans include loan fees. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances.

U.S. Bancorp

81


Table of Contents

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Daily Average Balance Sheet and Related Yields and Rates (a)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014 2013

(Dollars in Millions)

(Unaudited)

Average
Balances
Interest Yields
and
Rates
Average
Balances
Interest Yields
and
Rates
% Change
Average
Balances

Assets

Investment securities

$ 87,687 $ 1,473 2.24 % $ 74,303 $ 1,325 2.38 % 18.0 %

Loans held for sale

2,811 87 4.13 6,659 172 3.45 (57.8 )

Loans (b)

Commercial

74,424 1,651 2.96 66,719 1,626 3.26 11.5

Commercial real estate

40,465 1,180 3.90 37,872 1,188 4.19 6.8

Residential mortgages

51,799 1,504 3.88 47,055 1,452 4.12 10.1

Credit card

17,516 1,338 10.21 16,627 1,256 10.10 5.3

Other retail

48,098 1,622 4.51 47,034 1,736 4.93 2.3

Total loans, excluding covered loans

232,302 7,295 4.20 215,307 7,258 4.50 7.9

Covered loans

7,796 352 6.03 10,375 492 6.33 (24.9 )

Total loans

240,098 7,647 4.26 225,682 7,750 4.59 6.4

Other earning assets

5,691 89 2.10 7,019 141 2.70 (18.9 )

Total earning assets

336,287 9,296 3.69 313,663 9,388 4.00 7.2

Allowance for loan losses

(4,212 ) (4,403 ) 4.3

Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities

388 785 (50.6 )

Other assets

42,584 41,003 3.9

Total assets

$ 375,047 $ 351,048 6.8

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Noninterest-bearing deposits

$ 72,274 $ 67,183 7.6 %

Interest-bearing deposits

Interest checking

52,928 26 .07 48,347 26 .07 9.5

Money market savings

62,314 81 .17 54,826 54 .13 13.7

Savings accounts

33,940 35 .14 31,809 38 .16 6.7

Time deposits less than $100,000

11,151 93 1.12 13,082 147 1.50 (14.8 )

Time deposits greater than $100,000

31,055 113 .48 33,037 168 .68 (6.0 )

Total interest-bearing deposits

191,388 348 .24 181,101 433 .32 5.7

Short-term borrowings

30,362 207 .91 27,736 273 1.32 9.5

Long-term debt

24,864 543 2.92 21,968 587 3.57 13.2

Total interest-bearing liabilities

246,614 1,098 .60 230,805 1,293 .75 6.8

Other liabilities

12,974 12,033 7.8

Shareholders’ equity

Preferred equity

4,756 4,820 (1.3 )

Common equity

37,742 34,855 8.3

Total U.S. Bancorp shareholders’ equity

42,498 39,675 7.1

Noncontrolling interests

687 1,352 (49.2 )

Total equity

43,185 41,027 5.3

Total liabilities and equity

$ 375,047 $ 351,048 6.8

Net interest income

$ 8,198 $ 8,095

Gross interest margin

3.09 % 3.25 %

Gross interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments

3.02 % 3.18 %

Percent of Earning Assets

Interest income

3.69 % 4.00 %

Interest expense

.43 .55

Net interest margin

3.26 % 3.45 %

Net interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments

3.19 % 3.38 %

(a) Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent.
(b) Interest income and rates on loans include loan fees. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances.

82 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Part II — Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings — See the information set forth in Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1 of this Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors — There are a number of factors that may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial results or stock price. Refer to “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for discussion of these risks.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds — Refer to the “Capital Management” section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Part I for information regarding shares repurchased by the Company during the third quarter of 2014.

Item 6. Exhibits

12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101 Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

U.S. Bancorp

83


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

U.S. BANCORP
By: / S /      C RAIG E. G IFFORD

Craig E. Gifford
Controller
Dated: November 6, 2014 (Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)

84 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT 12

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Dollars in Millions) Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014

Earnings

1.

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp

$ 1,471 $ 4,363

2.

Applicable income taxes, including expense related to unrecognized tax positions

523 1,566

3.

Net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp before income taxes (1 + 2)

$ 1,994 $ 5,929

4.

Fixed charges:

a.

Interest expense excluding interest on deposits*

$ 250 $ 747
b.

Portion of rents representative of interest and amortization of debt expense

28 84
c.

Fixed charges excluding interest on deposits (4a + 4b)

$ 278 $ 831
d.

Interest on deposits

115 348
e.

Fixed charges including interest on deposits (4c + 4d)

$ 393 $ 1,179

5.

Amortization of interest capitalized

$ $

6.

Earnings excluding interest on deposits (3 + 4c + 5)

2,272 6,760

7.

Earnings including interest on deposits (3 + 4e + 5)

2,387 7,108

8.

Fixed charges excluding interest on deposits (4c)

278 831

9.

Fixed charges including interest on deposits (4e)

393 1,179

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

10.

Excluding interest on deposits (line 6/line 8)

8.17 8.13

11.

Including interest on deposits (line 7/line 9)

6.07 6.03

* Excludes interest expense related to unrecognized tax positions

U.S. Bancorp 85


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Richard K. Davis, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Bancorp;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/ S /    R ICHARD K. D AVIS
Richard K. Davis
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 6, 2014

86 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Andrew Cecere, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Bancorp;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/ S /    A NDREW C ECERE
Andrew Cecere
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 6, 2014

U.S. Bancorp 87


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/ S /    R ICHARD K. D AVIS / S /    A NDREW C ECERE
Richard K. Davis Andrew Cecere
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November 6, 2014

88 U.S. Bancorp


Table of Contents

Corporate Information

Executive Offices

U.S. Bancorp

800 Nicollet Mall

Minneapolis, MN 55402

Common Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar

Computershare acts as our transfer agent and registrar, dividend paying agent and dividend reinvestment plan administrator, and maintains all shareholder records for the corporation. Inquiries related to shareholder records, stock transfers, changes of ownership, lost stock certificates, changes of address and dividend payment should be directed to the transfer agent at:

Computershare

P.O. Box 30170

College Station, TX 77842-3170

Phone: 888-778-1311 or 201-680-6578 (international calls)

Internet: www.computershare.com/investor

Registered or Certified Mail:

Computershare

211 Quality Circle, Suite 210

College Station, TX 77845

Telephone representatives are available weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Central Standard Time, and automated support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Specific information about your account is available on Computershare’s Investor Centre TM website.

Independent Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP serves as the independent auditor for U.S. Bancorp’s financial statements.

Common Stock Listing and Trading

U.S. Bancorp common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol USB.

Dividends and Reinvestment Plan

U.S. Bancorp currently pays quarterly dividends on our common stock on or about the 15th day of January, April, July and October, subject to approval by our Board of Directors. U.S. Bancorp shareholders can choose to participate in a plan that provides automatic reinvestment of dividends and/or optional cash purchase of additional shares of U.S. Bancorp common stock. For more information, please contact our transfer agent, Computershare.

Investor Relations Contact

Sean C. O’Connor, CFA

Senior Vice President, Investor Relations

sean.oconnor@usbank.com

Phone: 612-303-0778 or 866-775-9668

Financial Information

U.S. Bancorp news and financial results are available through our website and by mail.

Website For information about U.S. Bancorp, including news, financial results, annual reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, access our home page on the internet at usbank.com, click on About U.S. Bank .

Mail At your request, we will mail to you our quarterly earnings, news releases, quarterly financial data reported on Form 10-Q, Form 10-K and additional copies of our annual reports. Please contact:

U.S. Bancorp Investor Relations

800 Nicollet Mall

Minneapolis, MN 55402

investorrelations@usbank.com

Phone: 866-775-9668

Media Requests

Dana Ripley

Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications

dana.ripley@usbank.com

Phone: 612-303-3167

Privacy

U.S. Bancorp is committed to respecting the privacy of our customers and safeguarding the financial and personal information provided to us. To learn more about the U.S. Bancorp commitment to protecting privacy, visit usbank.com and click on Privacy .

Code of Ethics

At U.S. Bancorp, we value high ethical standards above all else. Our ethical principles — integrity, respect, responsibility and good citizenship — guide everything we do. Demonstrating these principles through our words and actions is how we put the power of US to work for our employees, customers, shareholders and communities. Each year, every employee certifies compliance with the letter and spirit of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. For details about our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, visit usbank.com and click on About U.S. Bank and Working at U.S. Bank .

Diversity and Inclusion

U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to developing and maintaining a workplace that reflects the diversity of the communities we serve. We value creating a culture of inclusion where individual differences are valued and respected, which enables us to innovate and drive business success. We support a work environment where each individual who shares the fundamental values of the Company has an opportunity to contribute and grow based on merit.

Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action

U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunity to all employees and applicants for employment. In keeping with this commitment, employment decisions are made based on abilities, not race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity or expression, genetic information or any other factors protected by law. The corporation complies with municipal, state and federal fair employment laws, including regulations applying to federal contractors.

U.S. Bancorp, including each of our subsidiaries, is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating a diverse workforce.

Accessibility

U.S. Bancorp is committed to providing ready access to our products and services so all of our customers, including people with disabilities, can succeed financially. To learn more, visit usbank.com and click on Accessibility.

LOGO

LOGO

This report has been produced on recycled paper. LOGO

TABLE OF CONTENTS