UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant
x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
|
o
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
o
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
x
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
o
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
o
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to S240.14a-11(c) or S240.14a-12
|
UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filling Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
x
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
|
|
1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined).
|
|
|
4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
2)
|
Form, Schedule, or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
4)
|
Date Filed:
|
|
March 12, 2014
Dear UTMD Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD). The meeting will be held promptly at 12:00 noon (local time), on Friday, May 2, 2014 at the corporate offices of UTMD, 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, Utah USA. Please use the North Entrance.
Please note that attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to shareholders as of the record date (or their authorized representatives) and guests of the Company. Proof of ownership can be a copy of the enclosed proxy card. You may wish to refer to page one of this Proxy Statement for information about voting your proxy, including voting at the Annual Meeting.
At the Annual Meeting, we seek the approval of UTMD shareholders in electing two directors and ratifying the selection of an independent accounting firm. In an advisory vote, we are also asking UTMD shareholders to approve our executive compensation program. If you think you will be unable to attend the meeting, please complete your proxy and return it as soon as possible. If you decide later to attend the meeting, you may revoke the proxy and vote in person.
You have several options for obtaining UTMD’s public announcements and other disclosures including financial information, such as SEC Forms 10-K and 10-Q. You can be added to the Company email or regular mail lists by contacting Paul Richins with your email or mailing address, by sending an instruction letter to the corporate address, by calling (801-569-4200) with instructions, or by e-mailing your contact information to
info@utahmed.com.
As an alternative, you can view and print Company financial and other information directly from UTMD’s website;
http://www.utahmed.com
.
Thank you for your ownership in UTMD!
Sincerely
Kevin L. Cornwell
Chairman & CEO
UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
7043 South 300 West
Midvale, Utah 84047
(801) 566-1200
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 2, 2014
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. (the “Company” or “UTMD”), will be held at the corporate offices of the Company, 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, Utah, on May 2, 2014, at 12:00 noon local time, for the following purposes:
|
|
(1)
|
To elect two directors to serve terms expiring at the 2017 Annual Meeting and until successors are elected and qualified;
|
|
|
(2)
|
To ratify the selection of Jones Simkins LLC as the Company’s independent public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014; and
|
|
|
(3)
|
To hold an advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation program.
|
UTMD’s Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the nominated directors, whose backgrounds are described in the accompanying Proxy Statement, and “FOR” the other proposals.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on February 28, 2014 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
This Proxy Statement and form of proxy are being first furnished to shareholders of the Company on approximately March 24, 2014.
THE ATTENDANCE AT AND/OR VOTE OF EACH SHAREHOLDER AT THE ANNUAL MEETING IS IMPORTANT, AND EACH SHAREHOLDER IS ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Kevin L. Cornwell, Secretary
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dated: March 12, 2014
PLEASE PROMPTLY FILL IN, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY, WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.
If your shares are held in the name of a third party brokerage firm, nominee, or other institution, only that third party can vote your shares. In that case, please promptly
contact
the third party responsible for your account and
give instructions
how your shares should be voted.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PAGE
|
||
|
PROXY STATEMENT
|
1
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
2
|
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN PERSONS
|
4
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
|
5
|
|
|
2013 Summary Compensation Table
|
5
|
|
|
2013 Grants of Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards
|
5
|
|
|
2013 Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards
|
6
|
|
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year End
|
7
|
|
|
2013 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
|
7
|
|
|
2013 Pension Benefits
|
7
|
|
|
2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
7
|
|
|
2013 Director Compensation
|
7
|
|
|
DISCLOSURE RESPECTING THE COMPANY’S EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
|
8
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
8
|
|
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
13
|
|
|
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
|
13
|
|
|
Stockholder Communications with Directors
|
15
|
|
|
Report of the Compensation and Benefits Committee
|
15
|
|
|
Report of the Audit Committee
|
16
|
|
|
STOCK PERFORMANCE CHART
|
17
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 2. RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTING FIRM
|
18
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
19
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 2014
|
20
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
|
20
|
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
20
|
|
UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is furnished to shareholders of UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. (the “Company” or “UTMD”) in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the corporate offices of the Company, 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, Utah, on May 2, 2014 at 12:00 noon local time, and any postponement or adjournment(s) thereof. The enclosed proxy, when properly executed and returned in a timely manner, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions set forth thereon. If the enclosed proxy is signed and timely returned without specific instructions, it will be voted at the Annual Meeting:
|
(1)
|
FOR
the election of Ernst G. Hoyer and James H. Beeson, M.D., Ph.D. as directors
|
|
(2)
|
FOR the ratification of Jones Simkins LLC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
(3)
|
IN support of the Company’s executive compensation program;
|
The Board of Directors has approved the foregoing proposals and recommends that the shareholders vote in favor of each of the proposals. Proxies solicited by the Company will be voted FOR each of the proposals unless a vote against, or an abstention from, one or more of the proposals is specifically indicated on the proxy.
A proxy for the Annual Meeting is enclosed. It is important that each shareholder complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy promptly, whether or not she/he plans to attend the Annual Meeting. Any shareholder who executes and delivers a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time prior to its exercise by providing the Secretary of the Company with an instrument revoking the proxy or by providing the Secretary of the Company with a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. In addition, a shareholder may revoke her/his proxy by attending the Annual Meeting and electing to vote in person.
Proxies are being solicited by the Company. All costs and expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation will be paid by the Company. Proxies are being solicited by mail, but in certain circumstances, officers and directors of the Company may make further solicitation in person, by telephone, facsimile transmission, telegraph or overnight courier.
Only holders of the 3,751,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) issued and outstanding as of the close of business on February 28, 2014 (the “Record Date”), will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote. Holders of at least a majority of the 3,751,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date must be represented at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum for conducting business.
All properly executed and returned proxies, as well as shares represented in person at the meeting, will be counted for purposes of determining if a quorum is present, whether or not the proxies are instructed to abstain from voting or consist of broker non-votes. Under the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act, matters other than the election of directors and certain specified extraordinary matters are approved if the number of votes cast FOR exceed the number of votes cast AGAINST. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of determining whether a matter has been approved or a director has been elected.
Executive officers and directors holding an aggregate of 361,393 shares, or approximately 10%, of the issued and outstanding stock have indicated their intent to vote in favor of all proposals.
1
PROPOSAL NO. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
General
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board of Directors is divided into three classes as nearly equal in size as possible, with the term of each director being three years and until such director’s successor is elected and qualified. One class of the Board of Directors shall be elected each year at the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company. The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Ernst G. Hoyer and Dr. James H. Beeson for election as directors, each for a three-year term expiring at the 2017 Annual Meeting.
It is intended that votes will be cast, pursuant to authority granted by the enclosed proxy, for the election of the nominees named above as directors of the Company, except as otherwise specified in the proxy. In the event a nominee shall be unable to serve, votes will be cast, pursuant to authority granted by the enclosed proxy, for such other person as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The officers of the Company are elected to serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The information concerning the nominees and other directors and their security holdings has been furnished by them to the Company. (See “PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS” below.)
Directors and Nominees
The Board of Directors’ nominees for election as directors of the Company at the Annual Meeting are Ernst G. Hoyer and James H. Beeson. Other members of the Board of Directors were elected at the Company’s 2012 and 2013 meetings for terms of three years, and therefore, are not standing for election at the Annual Meeting. The terms of Mr. Cornwell and Mr. Richins expire at the 2015 Annual Meeting and the term of Dr. Payne expires at the 2016 Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has determined that Dr. Payne, Mr. Hoyer and Dr. Beeson are independent directors within the meaning of NASD Rule 5600(a)(2). None of the directors has served on the board of another public company during the past five years. None of the directors has been a party in a legal proceeding during the past ten years related to securities, financial institutions, fraud in connection with any business entity or agency or organization, as defined in the Exchange Act, that has disciplinary authority over its members. Background information appears below with respect to the incumbent directors whose terms have not expired, as well as the directors standing for reelection to the Board.
|
|
Year | ||
|
First
|
|||
|
Name
|
Age
|
Elected
|
Business Experience during Past Five Years a
nd Other Information
|
|
Kevin L. Cornwell
|
67
|
1993
|
Chairman of UTMD since 1996. President and CEO since December 1992. Secretary since 1993. Has served in various senior operating management positions in several technology-based companies over a 38-year time span, including as a director on seven other company boards. Received B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from Stanford University, M.S. degree in Management Science from the Stanford Graduate School of Engineering, and MBA degree specializing in Finance and Operations Management from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Among other personal and professional attributes, the board considers Mr. Cornwell’s decades of strategic and operational experience in the medical device industry and the Company’s many years of success and profitability under his guidance to be key reasons why he should continue as a member of the board.
|
|
Ernst G. Hoyer
|
76
|
1996
|
Retired for over 5 years. Served fifteen years as General Manager of Petersen Precision Engineering Company, Redwood City, CA. Previously served in engineering and general management positions for four technology-based companies over a 35-year time span. Received B.S. degree in process engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, and MBA degree from the University of Santa Clara. Among other personal and professional attributes, the board considers Mr. Hoyer’s experience with and understanding of manufacturing operations, along with his financial and accounting expertise, to be key reasons why he should continue as a member of the board.
|
2
|
|
Year | ||
| First | |||
|
Name
|
Age
|
Elected
|
Business Experience during Past Five Years a nd Other Information |
|
Barbara A. Payne
|
67
|
1997
|
Retired for over 5 years. Served over eighteen years as corporate research scientist for a Fortune 50 firm, and environmental scientist for a national laboratory. Received B.A. degree in psychology from Stanford University, M.A. degree from Cornell University, and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in sociology from Stanford University. Among other personal and professional attributes, the board considers Dr. Payne’s experience with and understanding of scientific research, her expertise in helping develop organizational excellence and her understanding of UTMD to be key reasons why she should continue as a member of the board.
|
|
James H. Beeson
|
72
|
2007
|
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician, Memorial Hermann SE Hospital, Houston, Texas. Professor at University of Texas, Houston, Medical School. Received B.S. degree in Chemistry from Indiana University, Ph.D. degree in Organic Chemistry from M.I.T., MBA from Michigan State University, and MD from the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine. Served four year residency in Ob/Gyn at Chicago Lying-In Hospital, and has actively practiced Obstetrics and Gynecology for over 32 years. Currently licensed to practice medicine in the states of Utah, Oklahoma and Texas. Has published numerous articles and other technical papers. Among other personal and professional attributes, the board considers Dr. Beeson’s experience as an Ob/Gyn physician as well as his general understanding of clinical practice and healthcare delivery to be key reasons why he should continue as a member of the board.
|
|
Paul O. Richins
|
53
|
1998
|
Chief Administrative Officer of UTMD since 1997. Treasurer and Assistant Secretary since 1994. Joined UTMD in 1990. Received B.S. degree in finance from Weber State University, and MBA degree from Pepperdine University. Among other personal and professional attributes, the board considers Mr. Richins’ twenty-two years of experience with the Company and his successful tenure as Principal Financial Officer to be key reasons he should continue as a member of the board.
|
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics specifically for its Board of Directors. The Company also has a Code of Conduct that applies to all of its employees, including its named executive officers, principal financial officer, and Board of Directors. The Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct are available on the Company’s website, www.utahmed.com.
3
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN PERSONS
The following table furnishes information concerning the ownership of the Company’s Common Stock as of February 28, 2014, by the directors, the nominees for director, the executive officers named in the compensation tables on page 5, all directors and executive officers as a group, and those known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock as of December 31, 2013.
|
Name
|
Nature of Ownership
|
Number of Shares Owned
|
Percent
|
||||||
|
Principal Shareholders
|
|||||||||
|
FMR Corp
|
Direct
|
425,000 | 11.3 | % | |||||
|
82 Devonshire Street
|
|||||||||
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|||||||||
|
Bares Capital Management, Inc.
|
Direct
|
398,937 | 10.6 | % | |||||
| 221 West 6th Street, Suite 1225 | |||||||||
|
Austin, Texas 78701
|
|||||||||
| T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. | Direct | 280,156 | 7.5 | % | |||||
| 100 East Pratt Street | |||||||||
| Baltimore, Maryland 21202-1009 | |||||||||
|
American Century Investment Management, Inc.
|
Direct
|
210,269 | 5.6 | % | |||||
|
430 West 7
th
Street
|
|||||||||
|
Kansas City, Missouri 64105
|
|||||||||
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|||||||||
|
Kevin L. Cornwell
(1)
|
Direct
|
268,967 | 7.2 | % | |||||
|
Options
|
- | 0.0 | % | ||||||
|
Total
|
268,967 | 7.2 | % | ||||||
|
Ernst G. Hoyer
(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
Direct
|
33,844 | 0.9 | % | |||||
|
Options
|
- | 0.0 | % | ||||||
|
Total
|
33,844 | 0.9 | % | ||||||
|
Barbara A. Payne
(2)(3)(4)
|
Direct
|
29,838 | 0.8 | % | |||||
|
Options
|
- | 0.0 | % | ||||||
|
Total
|
29,838 | 0.8 | % | ||||||
|
Paul O. Richins
|
Direct
|
26,556 | 0.7 | % | |||||
|
Options
|
- | 0.0 | % | ||||||
|
Total
|
26,556 | 0.7 | % | ||||||
|
James H. Beeson
(2)(3)(4)
|
Direct
|
2,188 | 0.1 | % | |||||
|
Options
|
17,812 | 0.5 | % | ||||||
|
Total
|
20,000 | 0.5 | % | ||||||
|
All executive officers and
|
Direct
|
361,393 | 9.6 | % | |||||
|
directors as a group (5 persons)
|
Options
|
17,812 | 0.5 | % | |||||
|
Total
|
379,205 | 10.1 | % | ||||||
(1) Executive Committee member
(2) Audit Committee member
(3) Governance and Nominating Committee member
(4) Compensation and Benefits Committee member
In the previous table, shares owned directly by directors and executive officers are owned beneficially and of record, and such record shareholder has sole voting, investment and dispositive power. Calculations of percentage of shares outstanding assumes the exercise of options to which the percentage relates. Percentages calculated for totals assume the exercise of options comprising such totals.
4
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company, all Section 16(a) requirements applicable to persons who were
officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders during the preceding fiscal year
were complied with.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth, for the last three fiscal years, compensation received by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. There are no other named executive officers.
2013 Summary Compensation Table
|
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-equity
Incentive Plan Compen-sation
($)
|
All
Other
Compen-
sation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
|
Kevin L. Cornwell
Chairman & CEO
|
2013
2012
2011
|
234,000
234,000
238,335
|
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
252,000
259,350
225,625
|
6,720
6,900
6,280
|
492,720
500,250
470,240
|
|
Paul O. Richins
|
2013
|
108,393
|
--
|
--
|
18,106
|
3,297
|
129,796
|
|
VP & Principal Financial Officer
|
2012
2011
|
105,528
103,754
|
--
--
|
--
--
|
18,634
16,450
|
3,679
3,160
|
127,841
123,364
|
Narrative disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table:
|
1.
|
Amounts included in All Other Compensation represent the aggregate total of Company 401(k) matching contributions, Company Section 125 matching contributions, and reimbursements under UTMD’s pet insurance plan to each named executive officer, all of which are benefits available to regular full-time employees. During 2013, each named executive officer will be eligible to receive payment of eligible medical expenses under the employee Health Plan, up to $6,120 in 401(k) matching contributions, up to $500 in pet health cost reimbursements and up to $600 in matching Section 125 matching contributions.
|
|
2.
|
Medical, dental and vision expenses paid under the Company’s Health Plan, which are available to regular full-time employees, are not included in the above table.
|
|
3.
|
Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation amounts, as described in more detail starting on page 10 under Bonuses were paid in late December or early February of the applicable following calendar year, representing Management Bonuses earned during the fiscal year reported.
|
2013 Grants of Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards
No stock option awards were made in 2013 to any of the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table, or are currently planned for 2014. The Company has no other equity incentive plans
5
2013 Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards
Named Executive Officers participated in the Profit-Sharing Sales & Management Bonus Plan (MB Plan), generally available to all exempt, as well as key nonexempt, employees. The structure of the performance-based MB Plan is described in the following
Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
The 2013 awards under the MB Plan to the named executive officers were recommended by the Compensation and Benefits Committee in early 2014, after the independent audit of financial results had been concluded. The awards were subsequently approved by the Board of Directors. The structure of the MB Plan remains the same for 2014.
Additional disclosure regarding executive and employee compensation
The Compensation and Benefits Committee establishes the criteria, and directs the implementation, of all compensation program elements for the CEO. The CEO’s base salary is set early in each calendar year by the Board of Directors after review of the recommendation of the Compensation and Benefits Committee. Mr. Cornwell’s base salary in 2014 will remain the same as set in 2013 and 2012. The annual MB paid to Mr. Cornwell in early 2014 for 2013 performance represented 51% of his total 2013 compensation. Mr. Cornwell’s 2013 MB was 3% lower than in 2012. In 2013, the Company’s consolidated EBT was down less than 1% and EPS were up less than 1% (not including a tax provision reduction resulting from a deferred tax liability adjustment that increased 2013 EPS to 10% over 2012 EPS). Consistent with prior years, Mr. Cornwell’s MB was tied closely to UTMD profits and eps.
For all other employees, in collaboration with the other executive officer(s), the CEO develops compensation policies, plans and programs that are intended to meet the objectives of the Company’s overall compensation program. The Compensation and Benefits Committee annually reviews and approves the elements of the compensation program recommended by the CEO. In addition, the committee periodically reviews any proposed changes within a calendar year. The compensation of employees other than the CEO, including other named executive officer(s), is administered by the CEO under the review and ratification of the Compensation Committee comprised of all the independent directors. Eighty-two UTMD employees, including employees of its subsidiaries, received bonuses for 2013 performance.
Mr. Richins’ base salary at the beginning of 2014 was $109,300, which is subject to review and adjustment during the year on the same basis as the Company’s performance review criteria for its exempt employees. Mr. Richins’ MB, which was about 14% of his total compensation in 2013, decreased 3% compared to 2012, consistent with UTMD’s CEO and other exempt employees’ MB.
Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment, and Change in Control.
Except for Mr. Cornwell, the Company has no employment agreements in the United States. In Ireland, UTMD is subject to providing certain statutory advance notice and severance benefits to its employees in the event of redundancy termination. In the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia (AUS), Femcare has employment agreements with each of its employees that typically include a three month termination notice or pay in lieu of notice.
In May 1998, the Company entered into an agreement with the CEO to provide a long term incentive to increase shareholder value. The Company is required to pay Mr. Cornwell additional compensation in the event his employment is terminated as a result of a change in control at the election of the Company or by the mutual agreement of Mr. Cornwell and the Company. Under the agreement, the additional compensation that the Company is required to pay Mr. Cornwell is equal to his last three years’ salary and bonuses, and the appreciation of stock value for awarded options above the option exercise price. Mr. Cornwell currently has no outstanding option shares. Based on actual salary plus bonuses for the three years of 2011-2013, the additional compensation would be $1,441,310.
In the event of a change in control, the Company will also pay Mr. Cornwell incentive compensation under the agreement equal to about 2% of the value paid by an acquiring company that exceeds $14.00 per share. For example, at the $57.16 per share closing price at the end of 2013, the amount of incentive compensation in the event of an acquisition of UTMD would be $3,237,000. At the time of the execution of the agreement, the value per UTMD share was $7.75.
Except for notice, or payment in lieu thereof, provisions in UK employee contracts, UTMD’s CEO is the only employee with a formal termination benefit agreement, which was last modified in 1998. Unless acquired as part of the acquisition of another company in a stock purchase transaction, the Board of Directors does not anticipate the need for any other agreements for the indefinite future. In the absence of any practical requirement, UTMD has no general policies regarding termination benefits.
The Company is also required to pay all other optionees under employee and outside director’s option plans, the appreciation of stock value for awarded options above the option exercise price (“in the money”) in the event of a change of control of the Company. The number of options outstanding as of December 31, 2013, excluding those held by outside directors, was 73,166 at an average exercise price of $26.77/ share. At the year-end 2013 per share closing price, the amount of change of control pay due all optionees excluding the outside directors would be $2,223,500.
6
|
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2013 Fiscal Year End
|
Neither of the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table had outstanding equity awards at 2013 fiscal year end. The Company has no outstanding Stock Awards.
|
|
2013 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
|
|
Option Awards
|
||||||||
|
Named Executive Officer
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
|
||||||
|
Kevin L. Cornwell
|
10,000 | 177,100 | ||||||
|
Paul O. Richins
|
650 | 17,418 | ||||||
The Company has made no Stock Awards.
|
|
2013 Pension Benefits
|
The Company does not provide a defined benefit pension plan to any employee.
|
|
2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
The Company does not provide nonqualified deferred compensation to any employee.
|
|
2013 Director Compensation
|
|
Name
|
Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)
|
Stock Awards
($)
|
Option Awards
($)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
James Beeson
|
25,000 | -- | -- | -- | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
Ernst Hoyer
|
32,000 | -- | -- | -- | 32,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
Barbara Payne
|
25,000 | -- | -- | -- | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Narrative disclosure to the Director Compensation Table:
|
1.
|
Mr. Hoyer received $4,000 for participating as a member of the Executive Committee, $3,000 as Chairman of the Audit Committee and $25,000 as the base annual director’s fee.
|
|
2.
|
Dr. Beeson received the $25,000 base annual director’s fee.
|
|
3.
|
Dr. Payne received the $25,000 base annual director’s fee.
|
|
4.
|
For 2014, the outside directors’ fees will remain the same.
|
At the 2003 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the 2003 Employees’ and Directors’ Incentive Plan, under which up to 1.2 million shares could have been granted over the ten-year life of the plan. The Board of Directors did not approve an award of outside director options in the three preceding years 2000-2002, or in the ensuing years of 2004-2013, except for a 10,000 share award to Dr. Beeson upon joining the board in 2007 and an ensuing 10,000 share award to Dr. Beeson in 2008. The 2003 Plan expired in February 2013.
At the 2013 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the 2013 Employees’ and Directors’ Incentive Plan, under which up to 600,000 shares may be granted over the ten-year life of the plan. No option shares were granted under the Plan during 2013.
At December 31, 2013, 17,812 total unexercised outside director options were outstanding: 10,000 with a $31.33 exercise price and 7,812 with a $28.13 exercise price. The Company is required to pay outside director optionees the appreciation of stock value for issued options above the option exercise price in the event of a change of control of the Company. At the $57.16 per share closing price at the end of 2013, the amount of change in control pay due outside directors would be $485,100.
7
DISCLOSURE RESPECTING THE COMPANY’S EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table summarizes, as of the end of the most recent fiscal year, compensation plans, including individual compensation arrangements, under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance, aggregated for all compensation plans previously approved by shareholders and for all plans not previously approved by shareholders:
|
Plan Category
|
Number of Securities
To Be Issued upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and Rights
(a)
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
(b)
|
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance under
Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities
reflected
in column (a))
(c)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
91,000 | $ | 27.39 | 100,000 | ||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
- |
(Not applicable)
|
- | |||||||||
|
Total
|
91,000 | $ | 27.39 | 100,000 | ||||||||
Additional disclosure regarding dilution from equity awards:
In 2003 and 2013, shareholders approved incentive stock option plans for employees and directors summarized in the table above.
The Company currently has no other equity award programs. The dilutive impact to shareholders of stock option awards is provided in the tables below:
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
||||||||||
|
Option shares available for award per shareholder approved option plans (beginning of year)
|
816,641 | 864,454 | 963,423 | |||||||||
|
Option shares allocated by the Board of Directors
|
*72,000 | 13,000 | 13,000 | |||||||||
|
Total option shares awarded
|
67,200 | 13,000 | 0 | |||||||||
|
|
*Note: The 2011 allocation includes a special 60,000 share Femcare employee allocation on the closing date of the acquisition.
|
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
||||||||||
|
Total unexercised awarded option shares (end of year)
|
238,306 | 149,527 | 90,978 | |||||||||
|
Weighted-average unexercised option exercise price
|
$ | 25.23 | $ | 26.68 | $ | 27.39 | ||||||
|
Closing market price of UTMD stock per share (end of year)
|
$ | 27.00 | $ | 36.05 | $ | 57.16 | ||||||
|
(A) Dilution from options (shares)
|
14,072 | 33,961 | 46,636 | |||||||||
|
(B) Weighted average shares outstanding
|
3,630,507 | 3,677,311 | 3,727,982 | |||||||||
|
Total diluted shares outstanding (A+B), used for EPS calculation
|
3,644,580 | 3,711,272 | 3,774,618 | |||||||||
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
General
Under the supervision of the Compensation and Benefits Committee, the Company has developed and implemented compensation policies, plans and programs that seek to enhance the long-term profitability, EPS growth and return on shareholders’ equity (ROE) of the Company, and thus shareholder value, by aligning closely the financial interests of the Company’s senior management and other key employees with those of its shareholders. The long term key financial performance objectives are a 20% annually compounded rate of increase in EPS and an average ROE prior to payment of cash dividends greater than 25%. The Company has actually achieved a 17% annually compounded rate of increase in EPS and an average of 29% ROE (prior to payment of shareholder dividends) over the twenty-seven years since 1986, its first year of profitability since becoming a publicly-traded company.
8
At the beginning of each year, the Board of Directors approves an operating plan which sets the standards for the Company’s financial and nonfinancial performance. The performance each year may vary according to general economic conditions, competitive environment, life cycle of products, new product development and other factors. The Compensation and Benefits Committee then approves compensation criteria set in relation to the Company’s annual operating plan which includes numerous income statement, balance sheet and cash flow measures, in addition to nonfinancial objectives established for each employee participating in the annual MB program.
The Company applies a consistent philosophy to compensation for all employees, including senior management. The philosophy is based on the premise that the achievements of the Company result from the coordinated efforts of all individual employees working toward common objectives. The Company strives to achieve those objectives through teamwork that is focused on meeting the needs and expectations of customers and shareholders.
The Company believes that its compensation policies, in particular its profit-sharing management bonus program and employee stock option awards, align key employee compensation with shareholder interest in creating longer term shareholder value and consistent profitability. There are no compensation programs or policies that create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
There are seven basic objectives for the Company’s compensation program:
(1)
Pay for Performance
. The basic philosophy is that rewards are provided for the long-term value of individual contribution and performance to the Company. Rewards are both recurring (
e.g.
, base salary) and non-recurring (
e.g.,
bonuses), and both financial and non-financial (
e.g.,
recognition and time off).
(2)
Provide for Fairness and Consistency in the Administration of Pay
. Compensation is based on the value of the job, what each individual brings to the job, and how well each individual performs on the job, consistently applied across all functions of the Company.
(3)
Pay Competitively
. The Company believes it needs to attract and retain the best people in the industry in order to achieve one of the best performance records in the industry. In doing so, the Company needs to be perceived as rewarding well, where competitive compensation includes the total package of base pay, bonuses, awards and other benefits.
(4)
Conduct an Effective Performance Review Process
. The Company believes it needs to encourage individual employee growth and candidly review each individual’s performance in a timely way. This feedback process is bilateral, providing management with an evaluation of the Company through the eyes of its employees.
(5)
Effectively Plan and Administer the Compensation Program
. Expenditures for employee compensation must be managed to what the Company can afford and in a way that meets management goals for overall performance and return on shareholder equity.
(6)
Communicate Effectively
. The Company believes that an effective communication process must be employed to assure that its employees understand how compensation objectives are being administered and met.
(7)
Meet All Legal Requirements
. The compensation program must conform to all state and federal employment laws and rules.
The Company uses essentially five vehicles in its compensation program.
(1)
Salary
. UTMD sets base salaries by reviewing the aggregate of base salary and annual bonus for competitive positions in the market. The CEO’s base salary is set early in each calendar year by the Board of Directors. Because UTMD is a small company where responsibilities are fluid and cross functional lines, there may not be a one for one comparison with other companies’ job positions. Based on the knowledge and experience of members of senior management and the Compensation Committee, base salaries are fixed at levels somewhat below the competitive amounts paid to management with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at other similarly profitable companies engaged in the same or similar businesses.
Then, annual bonuses and longer term incentive compensation are more highly leveraged and tied closely to the Company’s success in achieving significant financial and non-financial goals.
9
(2)
Bonuses
. UTMD’s Profit-Sharing Sales & Management Bonus (MB) Plan, which funds annual management bonuses, along with other contemporaneous incentives during the year, is generated out of a pretax/prebonus profit-sharing pool accrued throughout the year, and finalized, where the annual bonus portion is concerned, after the year-end independent financial audit has been completed. Prior to 2006, the Board of Directors had approved an accrual guideline of 4% of pretax, prebonus earnings, plus 10% of pretax, prebonus earnings improvements over the prior year’s results, as an allocation for the plan. For example, if the Company achieved 20% growth in pretax/prebonus accrual earnings, the MB Plan would accrue 6% of pretax, prebonus earnings during the applicable year into a “pool.” The pool would then be distributed after the completed independent audit after recommendation of the Compensation and Benefits Committee and approval by the Board. Beginning in 2006, although the mechanism for the MB Plan remains unchanged, in order to compensate for the decrease in the number of option shares granted key employees (as the result of the requirement to expense the estimated “value” of options), the Board of Directors increased the base percent of the annual Management Bonus accrual formula from 4% to 5% of pretax/prebonus profits, and, except for the CEO, added an additional bonus inflating factor ranging from 7-15%.
UTMD’s management personnel, beginning with the first level of supervision and professional management, and including certain non-management specialists and technical people, together with all direct sales representatives, are eligible as participants in the MB Plan. At the beginning of the year, plan participants were generally awarded participation units in the bonus plan, proportional to base salary and responsibility, based on senior management’s determination of the relative contribution expected from each person toward attaining Company goals. Each individual’s performance objectives, derived as the applicable contribution needed from that key employee to achieve the Company’s overall business plan for the year, are available for review as needed by the Committee. As part of the planning process, each eligible employee develops a set of measurable and dated objectives for the ensuing year. Achieving the Company’s plan sets an expected value per bonus unit. After the end of the year, each individual participant’s contribution to the Company’s performance is assessed by senior management in order to determine an additional allocation of units for individual contributions, with the accomplishment of the beginning of year objectives as a key component. In 2013, 82 employees, including employees of UTMD’s subsidiaries, were included in the distribution of a $531,600 annual MB Plan payout, not including payroll taxes. The MB Plan also funded $9,300 in extraordinary bonuses paid contemporaneously to non-executive employees during the year, $10,600 in non-exempt employee attendance bonuses, $5,500 in continuing education, $5,100 in holiday gifts to employees and $150,000 for the Health Plan.
The Company makes occasional cash awards, in amounts determined on an individual basis
,
to employees who make extraordinary contributions to the performance of the Company at any time during the year. These contemporaneous payments are made as frequently as possible to recognize excellent accomplishments when they occur. The awards are funded from the accrued MB plan described above, and therefore do not otherwise impact the Company’s financial performance. Senior management is not eligible for these awards.
(3)
Employee Stock Options
. The Compensation and Benefits Committee believes that its awards of stock options have successfully focused the Company’s management personnel on building profitability and shareholder value. The Board of Directors considers this policy highly contributory to growth in future shareholder value. Given the rapid increase in the market value of the Company’s shares in 2013, no options were awarded. In the future, the number of options awarded reflects the judgment of the Board of the number of options sufficient to constitute a material, recognizable benefit to recipients. No explicit formula criteria are utilized, other than minimizing dilution to shareholder interests and the impact on earnings per share for option expense. When taken together with the share repurchase program, the net result of the option program over the last ten years has been awarding option shares to key employees at a higher price, and in substantially smaller amounts, than shares actually repurchased in the open market during the same time period.
At the 2003 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the 2003 Employees’ and Directors’ Incentive Plan, under which up to 1.2 million shares could have been granted over the ten-year life of the plan. As of March 1, 2014, 81,300 unexercised option shares are outstanding under the 2003 Plan. During the same period of time that 160,600 (uncancelled) option shares were granted to employees under the 2003 Plan, UTMD repurchased 1.4 million of its shares in the open market.
10
After the conclusion of the annual independent audit and public announcement of financial results, the Board of Directors typically allocates an annual amount of shares for employee options each year at its regularly scheduled Board meeting following the audited close of the prior year’s financial performance. Option shares may be awarded on this same date at the closing price on the date of the meeting. Some number of allocated shares are usually reserved for awards later in the year to employees, including new or key employees with increased responsibilities. The Compensation and Benefits Committee approves all awards, and the closing price on the date of the approval is the exercise price of the option shares. According to policy, awards are not made in advance of material news events, or when material non-public information is known.
No option shares were awarded in 2013 under either the 2003 or 2013 Plans.
Employee and director options vest over a four-year period, with a ten-year exercise period. Management expects to recommend additional options be awarded on an annual basis to the Company’s key employees based on its belief that sharing ownership of the Company with those who help create its success is the best way to assure growth in shareholder value.
(4)
Retirement Plans
. The Company has sponsored a 401(k) retirement plan for U.S. employees since 1985, a contributory retirement plan for Irish employees since 1998, an acquired contributory retirement plan for Femcare UK employees since March 2011, and a contributory retirement plan for Femcare AUS employees since December 2013. The Compensation and Benefits Committee believes that a continuance of the retirement plans is consistent with ensuring a stable employment base by helping to provide Company employees with a vehicle to build long-term financial security. In 2013, the Company matched employee contributions and paid administrative costs at a total expense, including all of its subsidiaries, of about $143,000. For 2014, the Board of Directors has approved continuing the retirement plan matching formulas on the same basis as in 2013.
(5)
Group Benefit Plans
. In the U.S., the Company provides group medical, dental and life insurance benefit plans for its employees. For U.S. employees, the health benefits plan is consistent with self-funded group plans offered by other companies. The portion of the monthly premium cost is paid by U.S. plan participants on a graduated scale so that higher paid employees pay a higher premium. In Ireland, the UK and Australia, employees do not pay premiums, and are provided medical and life coverages consistent with benefits provided to employees of similar companies.
Structure for Executive Officer Compensation
The structure and activities of the Compensation Committee meet the requirements of SEC Rule 10C-1, as mandated by Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Act. In regard to Item 407 of Regulation S-K, in 2013 and to-date in 2014, the company has not retained or obtained the advice of a compensation advisor.
Utilizing the compensation objectives and vehicles outlined previously, the Compensation and Benefits Committee, comprised of all three outside directors, establishes the annual base salary for the CEO. All other employees’ salaries are set by the CEO, and reviewed by the Committee for consistency with the Company’s compensation objectives. The Committee periodically uses surveys of similar companies selected from among the companies with which UTMD’s stock is compared in the Stock Performance Chart, based on variations in industry type, geographic location, size, and profitability as the Committee deems appropriate. Base salary is fixed at a level somewhat below the competitive amounts paid to executive officers with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at other similarly sized companies engaged in the same or similar businesses. The annual bonus and long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options were more highly leveraged and tied closely to the Company’s success in achieving significant financial and non-financial goals.
The annual bonuses for the named executive officers are awarded using the same basis as all employees included in the annual profit-sharing MB Plan. The goals for executive officers include financial and non-financial goals. Financial goals include
net sales, gross profit margin, operating margin, after-tax profits, return on equity and earnings per share. Non-financial goals include continuing the development of a talented and motivated team of employees, conceiving and implementing programs to maintain competitive advantages and to achieve consistent earnings per share growth, reacting to competitive challenges, developing business initiatives to further support critical mass in a consolidating marketplace, promoting the Company’s participation in socially responsible programs, protecting intellectual property, maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements, achieving a high regard for the integrity of the Company and its management, and minimizing issues that represent significant business risk factors such as overly burdensome administrative programs and product liability exposure. In 2013, UTMD met or exceeded its growth and profitability objectives in a difficult economic period of time for all participants in the medical device industry. Based on the Company’s overall performance, annual management bonuses were about 3% lower on the average than in 2012 for the same level of responsibility and contribution for exempt employees regularly participating in the MB plan.
11
The Committee intends that stock options serve as an important component of executive officers’ total compensation in order to retain critical efforts on behalf of the Company and to focus efforts on enhancing shareholder value. The Committee believes that past option awards have successfully provided this incentive. An option for 50,000 shares was awarded the CEO in January 2004, at an exercise price of $25.59 per share. Except for the 2004 award, no CEO options have been awarded during the last fifteen years.
The following chart compares annual changes in total executive compensation with changes in earnings per share, shareholder return (year-end share price plus cash dividends paid during the year) and UTMD year-end market capitalization, starting at December 31, 2005:
Compensation and Benefits Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Compensation and Benefits Committee are Ernst G. Hoyer, Barbara A. Payne and James H. Beeson. No member of the committee is a present or former officer of the Company or any subsidiary. There are no other interlocks. No member of the Committee, his or her family, or his or her affiliate was a party to any material transactions with the Company or any subsidiary since the beginning of the last completed fiscal year. No executive officer of the Company serves as an executive officer, director or member of a compensation committee of any other entity, an executive officer or director of which is a member of the Compensation and Benefits Committee of UTMD.
12
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
None.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
Director Independence
UTMD’s Board of Directors has determined that a majority of its directors are independent, as that term is defined in NASD Rule 5605(a)(2), which satisfies the independence requirement of NASD Rule 5605(b)(1). The Board of Directors was not aware of any transactions, relationships or arrangements to be considered in determining that Dr. Payne, Mr. Hoyer and Dr. Beeson were independent under the NASD Rules.
Board Leadership
The roles of CEO and Chairman are held by Mr. Cornwell. Because of Mr. Cornwell’s training and experience in the organization of functions of a Board of Directors, his successful tenure on the board since 1993 and the small size of the Company’s board membership, the Board of Directors believes this structure is most appropriate at this time. Mr. Hoyer serves as the lead director of the outside directors because of his tenure as the longest serving outside director and his roles as Chairman of the Audit Committee and outside director representative on the Executive Committee
.
As the lead outside director, Mr. Hoyer coordinates independent meetings of the outside directors, and assimilates outside director questions and company management responses.
Risk Oversight
The Board of Directors takes a key role in overseeing the Company’s risks. The board receives frequent timely reports of the Company’s financial performance, changes in and composition of balance sheet accounts, quality assurance program effectiveness, product liability risks and status of relationships with all business constituencies including customers, employees, suppliers and government entities. The board reviews and authorizes all material contracts in which the Company enters, including banking relationships. The Governance and Nominating Committee receives regular reports on UTMD’s compliance with securities laws and communications with the SEC and shareholders. The Audit Committee has established an independent whistleblower hot line to encourage early and anonymous reporting of accounting irregularities or other violations of UTMD’s codes of ethics. The Board of Directors routinely reviews litigation threats, product/market strategies and operational activities of the Company.
Board Committees and Meetings
The Board of Directors held three formal meetings during 2013, and one meeting to date in 2014. All of the directors attended all meetings during their respective incumbencies. The independent outside directors also met without executive management three times during 2013, and once to date in 2014.
The Company has Executive, Audit, Governance and Nominating and Compensation and Benefits Committees. The current members of the Company’s committees are identified in the preceding Security Ownership table. The written committee charters, composition, schedule of meetings and attendance are available for public review at
www.utahmed.com/governance
.
During 2013 and to-date in 2014, the Executive Committee has held about two informal meetings per month. The Executive Committee met once formally in December 2013 to review 2013 financial performance and discuss operating objectives for 2014. Any formal actions taken on of behalf of the Board of Directors by the Executive Committee were subsequently presented to the full board for ratification.
The Audit Committee formally met four times during 2013 and once to date in 2014 to review the quarterly financial reports, periodic independent accounting reviews and financial and internal control audits by Jones Simkins LLC, UTMD’s independent audit firm. The Audit Committee selects the Company’s independent accountants, approves the scope of audit and related fees and reviews financial reports, audit results, internal accounting procedures, internal controls and other programs to comply with applicable requirements relating to financial accountability. The Audit Committee Chairman on behalf of the Audit Committee reviewed and selected independent auditors for the UK, Ireland and Australia subsidiaries’ financial audits and tax returns.
13
The Governance and Nominating Committee met formally three times during 2013, and once to date in 2014. The Governance and Nominating Committee, which is comprised of the independent members of the Board of Directors, takes the lead in developing and implementing policies that are intended to ensure that the Board of Directors will be appropriately constituted and organized to meet its fiduciary obligations to the Company and its shareholders, identify individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors, and develop and recommend to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company. During its meetings, after receiving the Company’s routine compliance reports, the Governance and Nominating Committee reviewed compliance by UTMD and its personnel, including executive officers and directors, with applicable regulatory requirements as well as the Company’s own compliance policies, and compared its established policies and procedures for compliance with current applicable laws and regulations, under the guidance of corporate counsel, as needed.
The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders. In accordance with the Company’s Bylaws, shareholders’ nominations for election as directors must be submitted in writing to the Company at its principal offices not less than 30 days prior to the Annual Meeting at which the election is to be held (or if less than 40 days’ notice of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders, not later than the tenth day following the date on which the notice of the Annual Meeting was mailed).
When considering candidates for directors, the Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account a number of factors, including the following:
|
·
|
judgment, skill, integrity and reputation;
|
|
·
|
whether the candidate has relevant business experience;
|
|
·
|
whether the candidate has achieved a high level of professional accomplishment;
|
|
·
|
independence from management under both Nasdaq and Securities and Exchange Commission definitions;
|
|
·
|
existing commitments to other businesses;
|
|
·
|
potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits;
|
|
·
|
corporate governance background and experience;
|
|
·
|
financial and accounting background that would permit the candidate to serve effectively on the Audit Committee; and
|
|
·
|
size, composition, and experience of the existing Board of Directors.
|
When considering director candidates, the committee looks for diversity in experience, education, knowledge of industry and geography that when taken in the aggregate of all directors provides a robust scope of understanding of the functional and strategic challenges that the Company faces.
The committee will consider candidates for directors suggested by stockholders using the same considerations. Stockholders wishing to suggest a candidate for director should write to Governance and Nominating Committee, Utah Medical Products, Inc., 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, UT 84047 and include:
|
·
|
a statement that the writer is a stockholder and is proposing a candidate for consideration by the committee;
|
|
·
|
the name of and contact information for the candidate;
|
|
·
|
a statement that the candidate is willing to be considered and would serve as a director if elected;
|
|
·
|
a statement of the candidate’s business and educational experience preferably in the form of a resume or curriculum vitae;
|
|
·
|
information regarding each of the factors identified above, other than facts regarding the existing Board of Directors, that would enable the committee to evaluate the candidate;
|
|
·
|
a statement detailing any relationship between the candidate and any customer, supplier, or competitor of the Company;
|
|
·
|
detailed information about any relationship or understanding between the stockholder and the proposed candidate; and
|
|
·
|
confirmation of the candidate’s willingness to sign the Company’s code of ethics and other restrictive covenants, and abide by all applicable laws and regulations.
|
14
Before nominating a sitting director for reelection at an annual meeting, the committee will consider:
|
·
|
the director’s performance on the Board of Directors and attendance at Board of Directors’ meetings; and
|
|
·
|
whether the director’s reelection would be consistent with the Company’s governance guidelines and ability to meet all applicable corporate governance requirements.
|
When seeking candidates for director, the committee may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others. After conducting an initial evaluation of the candidates, the committee will interview that candidate if it believes the candidate might be suitable for a position on the Board of Directors. The committee may also ask the candidate to meet with management. If the committee believes the candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board of Directors, it will recommend to the full Board of Directors that candidate’s nomination.
The Compensation and Benefits Committee, comprised of all incumbent outside directors, consulted by telephone and met formally in early 2013, late 2013 and again in early 2014 to review management performance relative to objectives, recommend compensation and develop compensation strategies and alternatives throughout the Company, including those discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. The deliberations culminated in recommendations ratified at the February 2013 and February 2014 Board of Directors meetings. None of the members of the Compensation and Benefits Committee or executive management has engaged a compensation consultant within the past five years.
The policy of the Company is that each member of the Board of Directors is encouraged, but not required, to attend the Annual Meeting. All five directors attended the 2013 Annual Meeting.
Stockholder Communications with Directors
UTMD stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board, any of its committees, or with any individual director may write to the Company at 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, UT 84047. Such letter should confirm that it is from a UTMD stockholder. Depending upon the subject matter, management will:
|
·
|
forward the communication to the director, directors, or committee to whom it is addressed;
|
|
·
|
attempt to handle the inquiry directly if it is a request for information about UTMD or other matter appropriately dealt with by management; or
|
|
·
|
not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature, or if it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.
|
At each Board of Directors’ meeting, a member of management presents a summary of communications received since the last meeting that were not forwarded to the directors, and make those communications available to the directors on request.
Report of the Compensation and Benefits Committee
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with UTMD management. Based on that review, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and this Proxy Statement. In August 2008, the Board of Directors adopted an updated Compensation and Benefits Committee charter, which is available at
www.utahmed.com
.
|
Submitted by the Compensation and Benefits Committee:
|
Ernst G. Hoyer
|
|
|
Barbara A. Payne
|
||
|
James H. Beeson
|
15
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of all outside directors, all of whom are independent as defined in Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 5605(a)(2) and under Rule 10A-3(b)(1) adopted pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the Audit Committee are James H. Beeson, Ernst G. Hoyer and Barbara A. Payne. In August 2008, the Board of Directors adopted an updated Audit Committee charter, which is available at www.utahmed.com. Ernst G. Hoyer is the Board of Directors’ designated Audit Committee Financial Expert consistent with The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Audit Committee oversees the financial reporting and internal controls processes for UTMD on behalf of the Board of Directors. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the quarterly and annual financial statements included in the Annual Report to Shareholders and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee formally met four times during 2013 and once to date in 2014 to review the quarterly financial reports and reviews and audits by Jones Simkins LLC, UTMD’s independent auditor. The Committee also met informally from time to time during the year. In accordance with Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, discussions were held with management and the independent auditors as needed regarding the acceptability and the quality of the accounting principles used in the reports. These discussions included the clarity of the disclosures made therein, the underlying estimates and assumptions used in the financial reporting, and the reasonableness of the significant judgments and management decisions made in developing the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors their independence from the Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 and The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Audit Committee has also met with Company management and its independent auditors and discussed issues related to the overall scope and objectives of the audits conducted, the internal controls used by the Company, the openness and honesty of management, auditor verification of information provided by management, quality control procedures used by auditors in performing the independent audit, and any possible conflicts of interest. The Committee elicited recommendations for improving UTMD’s internal control procedures. The independent auditors completed a formal review of the scope and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control procedures, and made a couple of informal suggestions.
Pursuant to the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
Submitted by the Audit Committee:
|
Ernst G. Hoyer
|
|
|
Barbara A. Payne
|
||
|
James H. Beeson
|
16
STOCK PERFORMANCE CHART
The following chart compares what an investor’s five-year cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) would have been assuming initial $100 investments on December 31, 2008, for the Company’s Common Stock and the two indicated indices. The Company’s Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market.
Effective this year, the Company is changing its peer group index as a result of a change in the total return data made available to UTMD by NASDAQ, its vendor provider. The performance graphs going forward will be using a comparable index provided by NASDAQ OMX Global Indexes. Cumulative shareholder return data respecting the Nasdaq Composite Total Return are included as the comparable broad market index. The peer group index, ICB: 4537 Medical Supplies, is comprised of Nasdaq Stocks in the Medical Supplies subsector of medical device industry stocks traded on Nasdaq, of which UTMD belongs.
|
Dec-08
|
Dec-09
|
Dec-10
|
Dec-11
|
Dec-12
|
Dec-13
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
|
100.0 | 132.4 | 129.4 | 133.5 | 172.7 | 259.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
NASDAQ Composite Total Return
|
100.0 | 145.3 | 171.5 | 170.1 | 199.8 | 279.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
NASDAQ ICB: 4537 Medical Supplies
|
100.0 | 119.5 | 128.4 | 123.6 | 152.1 | 186.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
17
The following chart, covering the same time period and using similar methodology as the chart above, provides cumulative total return information using the Company’s “old” peer group index, Nasdaq Stocks with Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 3840-3849. UTMD’s primary SIC code is 3841. The Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S. and Foreign) broad market index shown below and the SIC 3840-3849 peer group index shown below will not be provided in the future.
|
Dec-08
|
Dec-09
|
Dec-10
|
Dec-11
|
Dec-12
|
Dec-13
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
|
100.0 | 132.4 | 129.4 | 133.5 | 172.7 | 259.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Nasdaq Stock Market (US & Foreign)
|
100.0 | 145.3 | 171.5 | 170.1 | 199.7 | 279.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Nasdaq Stocks (SIC 3840-3849) Medical Devices, Instruments and Supplies
|
100.0 | 145.8 | 155.5 | 178.7 | 198.9 | 233.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
PROPOSAL NO 2. RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTING FIRM
The Audit Committee selected, and the Board of Directors ratified, the engagement of Jones Simkins LLC as the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm for the two years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Audit Committee has determined to appoint Jones Simkins LLC as the Company’s auditor and independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014, contingent on acceptable terms of engagement including schedule and fee agreement.
If the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm is not ratified by shareholders, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Even if the selection is ratified by shareholders, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may determine to appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm if the Audit Committee believes that it would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
Representatives of Jones Simkins LLC will be present at the Annual Meeting, have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and be available to respond to shareholder questions.
18
Fees billed by Jones Simkins LLC
The following table shows the aggregate fees billed for the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and for other services rendered by Jones Simkins LLC for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
|
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
|
Audit Fees
|
$ | 100,750 | $ | 98,917 | ||||
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
1,578 | 1,500 | ||||||
|
Tax Fees
|
20,300 | 19,500 | ||||||
|
All Other Fees
|
-- | -- | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 122,628 | $ | 119,917 | ||||
Audit Fees.
Fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, reviews of the financials included in UTMD’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and related regulatory reviews, and audit of its internal controls in accordance with the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
Audit-Related Fees.
Fees for due diligence in connection with acquisitions and related accounting consultations, compliance with financing arrangements and attest services that were not required by statute or regulation.
Tax Fees.
Fees for tax filing, preparation and tax and IRS audit advisory services.
All Other Fees.
Fees for any other services not included in audit fees, audit-related fees and tax fees.
Audit Committee Policy and Approval
The engagements of UTMD auditors to perform all of the above-described services were made by the Audit Committee. This includes independent auditor firms other than Jones Simkins LLC that were required for financial audits of Femcare and its subsidiaries, year-end and statutory fiscal year 2013 financial and internal control audits of Femcare and its subsidiaries, the completion of tax returns for Femcare and its subsidiaries, and statutory audits of the Company’s employee benefits plans. The policy of the Audit Committee is to require that all services performed by independent auditors be pre-approved by the Audit Committee before services are performed.
Auditor Independence
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the services rendered for nonaudit matters is compatible with maintaining Jones Simkins’ independence, and concluded that its independence was not impaired by performing such work for the Company.
PROPOSAL NO 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, UTMD seeks to develop and implement its executive compensation program to enhance the long-term financial value of the Company by closely aligning the financial interests of the Company’s senior management and other key employees with those of its shareholders.
The Board of Directors values and encourages constructive dialogue on compensation and other important governance topics with shareholders, to whom it is ultimately accountable. The Board of Directors has determined to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation every year, which it believes will enhance shareholder communication by providing another avenue to obtain information on shareholder views about the Company’s executive compensation program.
Although the vote is non-binding, the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee will review the voting results and consider constructive feedback obtained through this process in making future decisions about executive compensation.
19
Accordingly, the Board of Directors proposes that shareholders approve the following advisory resolution:
RESOLVED, that the UTMD shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to UTMD’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 2014
This proxy statement and the annual report to shareholders are available at
www.utahmed.com/proxy.htm
.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
No proposals have been submitted by shareholders of the Company for consideration at the 2014 Annual Meeting. It is anticipated that the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held during May 2015. In accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8 and the advance notice requirements of Section 2.15 of UTMD’s Bylaws, shareholders may present proposals for inclusion in the Proxy Statement to be mailed in connection with the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company,
provided
such proposals are received by the Company no later than December 2, 2014, and are otherwise in compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the governing provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company.
MISCELLANEOUS
Other Business
There is no business other than that referred to in the Notice that may be considered at the Annual Meeting.
In order to assure the presence of the necessary quorum and to vote on the matters to come before the Annual Meeting, please indicate your choices on the enclosed proxy and date, sign, and return it promptly in the envelope provided. Whether or not you sign a proxy, we encourage you to attend the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Salt Lake City, Utah Kevin L. Cornwell
March 12, 2014 Chairman and CEO
20
PROXY
|
Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
|
(This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf
of the Board of Directors)
|
The undersigned hereby appoint Kevin L. Cornwell and Paul O. Richins, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote the shares of common stock of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the "Company") which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the "Annual Meeting") to be held at the corporate offices of the Company, 7043 South 300 West, Midvale, Utah, on May 2, 2014, at 12:00 noon, local time, and any postponement or adjournment(s) thereof, such proxies being directed to vote as specified below.
If no instructions are specified, such proxies will be voted "FOR" each of the proposals.
To vote in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations, sign below; the "FOR" boxes may, but need not be checked. To vote against any of the recommendations, check the appropriate box(es) marked "WITHHOLD
@
or
A
AGAINST," below.
|
(1)
|
To elect two directors of the Company to serve three year terms and until their successors are elected and qualified;
|
|||
|
Ernst G. Hoyer:
|
FOR o |
WITHHOLD
o
|
||
| James H. Beeson: | FOR o | WITHHOLD o | ||
|
(2)
|
To ratify the selection of Jones Simkins LLC as the Company’s independent public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014;
|
|||
|
FOR
o
|
AGAINST
o
|
ABSTAIN
o
|
||
|
(3)
|
To approve, by advisory vote, the Company’s executive compensation program;
|
|||
|
FOR
o
|
AGAINST
o
|
ABSTAIN
o
|
||
PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME APPEARS IN THE RECORDS OF THE COMPANY. WHEN SHARES ARE HELD BY JOINT TENANTS, BOTH SHOULD SIGN. IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD AT A BROKERAGE HOUSE, PLEASE INDICATE THE NAME OF THE BROKERAGE HOUSE AND THE NUMBER OF SHARES HELD.
|
Dated _________________________________
|
No. of Shares ________________________________
|
|
Signature ______________________________
|
Signature (if held jointly) _______________________
|
|
Print Name _____________________________
|
Print Name __________________________________
|
PLEASE ACT PROMPTLY
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROXY IN THE BUSINESS REPLY ENVELOPE PROVIDED. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholders Meeting to Be Held on May 2, 2014 -
the proxy statement and annual report are available at www.utahmed.com/proxy.htm.
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
7043 South 300 West
Midvale, Utah 84047
TABLE OF CONTENTS