VERINT SYSTEMS INC
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
¨
Check the appropriate box:
|
¨
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
¨
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
þ
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
¨
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
¨
|
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
|
|
VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
||||
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
||||
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
þ
|
No fee required
|
|
¨
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
¨
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
¨
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747
May 13, 2015
Dear Verint Systems Inc. Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Verint Systems Inc., which will be held on Thursday, June 25, 2015, at 11:00 A.M. Eastern Time at the
Hilton Garden Inn, 1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York 11803.
All holders of record of Verint Systems Inc. common stock as of May 1, 2015 are entitled to vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting.
Attached is our Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and our Proxy Statement, which describe the business to be conducted at the meeting. Also enclosed is our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015 and your proxy card. We encourage you to read the Form 10-K, which includes information on our operations, products and services, as well as our audited financial statements.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote. After reading the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, please promptly submit your proxy.
If you are the registered holder of your shares, then
we invite you to utilize the convenience of Internet voting at the website indicated on the enclosed proxy card.
Alternatively, you can vote by telephone or complete, sign, date and promptly return via mail the enclosed proxy card. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a bank, broker, or other nominee, please follow the specific instructions you receive from your bank, broker, or other nominee to vote your shares.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued support of Verint.
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Bodner
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Verint Systems Inc.
330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 25, 2015
The 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Verint Systems Inc. (“Verint”), a Delaware corporation, will be held on Thursday, June 25, 2015, at 11:00 A.M. Eastern Time at the Hilton Garden Inn, 1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York 11803 (the “2015 Annual Meeting”) for the following purposes:
|
(1)
|
To elect members of the Verint board of directors to serve for the following year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
|
|
(2)
|
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2016;
|
(3) To approve the Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan;
|
(4)
|
To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the accompanying proxy statement; and
|
|
(5)
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the 2015 Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
The board of directors has fixed the close of business on May 1, 2015 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2015 Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose concerning the meeting, during normal business hours at our principal executive offices, located at 330 South Service Road, Melville, New York 11747, during the ten days preceding the 2015 Annual Meeting.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Kohl
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary
|
|
May 13, 2015
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. IF YOU ARE THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF YOUR SHARES, THEN YOU MAY VOTE YOUR SHARES ELECTRONICALLY VIA THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY SIGNING, DATING, AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES IN “STREET NAME” THROUGH A BANK, BROKER, OR OTHER NOMINEE, PLEASE FOLLOW THE SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS YOU RECEIVE FROM YOUR BANK, BROKER, OR OTHER NOMINEE TO VOTE YOUR SHARES.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 25, 2015:
THE PROXY MATERIALS, INCLUDING THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, THE PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015, ARE AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET AT WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
i
VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747
PROXY STATEMENT
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of Verint's board of directors in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2015 Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, June 25, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time or any adjournment or postponement of this meeting. The 2015 Annual Meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn, 1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York 11803. Directions to the 2015 Annual Meeting can be found at the back of this proxy statement. Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to provide electronic access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our record and beneficial stockholders. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or to request a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials electronically by email on an ongoing basis. We encourage you to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet in order to help reduce the costs and environmental impact of printing proxy materials. We intend to mail the Notice and make available via the Internet this proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and our previously filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015 to each stockholder entitled to vote at our 2015 Annual Meeting on or about May 13, 2015.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING
Although we encourage you to read this proxy statement in its entirety, we include this question and answer section to provide some background information and brief answers to several questions you might have about the 2015 Annual Meeting.
Questions Relating to Proxy Materials
Q: Why am I receiving these materials?
A:
The board of directors is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with its solicitation of your proxy to vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting because you were a holder of Verint Systems Inc. common stock as of the close of business on May 1, 2015 (the “Record Date”) and are entitled to vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 61,358,001 shares of our common stock outstanding. This proxy statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote on the proposals expected to be presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting.
Q: Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of printed paper proxy materials?
A:
We are permitted to furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015, to our stockholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice, which was mailed to most of our stockholders, will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice. Any request to receive proxy materials by mail or email will remain in effect until you revoke it.
Q: Why did I receive printed paper proxy materials in the mail instead of a Notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?
A:
We are providing stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to reduce the environmental impact and the costs incurred by us in mailing printed proxy materials, you may elect to receive all future proxy materials electronically via email or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions for voting using the Internet that are provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in future years. Alternatively, you can go to
https://enroll.icsdelivery.com/vrnt
and enroll for Internet delivery of annual meeting and proxy voting materials.
Q: What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction card?
A:
It generally means that some of your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all Notices, proxy and voting instruction cards you receive.
Questions Relating to Voting
Q: What are the proposals and the voting recommendations of the board of directors?
A:
The proposals to be considered are as follows, and the board of directors recommends the following votes on each of the proposals:
|
•
|
FOR
each of the director nominees (Proposal No. 1);
|
|
•
|
FOR
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending January 31, 2016 (Proposal No. 2);
|
|
•
|
FOR
approval of the Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 3); and
|
|
•
|
FOR
approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement (Proposal No. 4).
|
Q: How many votes do I have?
A:
Each share of common stock that you owned at the close of business on the Record Date is entitled to one vote. These shares include:
|
•
|
shares held directly in your name as the “stockholder of record”; and
|
|
•
|
shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank, or other nominee in “street name”.
|
Q: What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
A:
Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
|
•
|
Stockholder of Record:
If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., you are considered the stockholder of record, and the Notice is being sent directly to you by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the 2015 Annual Meeting without further authorization from a third party.
|
|
•
|
Beneficial Owner:
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account, by a bank, or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name by such third party, and the Notice is being forwarded to you by your broker, bank, or their nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote your shares as described below and are also invited to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting. Since you are not the stockholder of record, however, you may not vote these shares in person at the 2015 Annual Meeting without a legal proxy from the record holder (your broker, bank, or other nominee). You may vote shares beneficially held by you as set out in the voting instruction card you receive from your broker, bank, or other nominee.
|
Q: How do I vote?
A:
If you wish to vote your shares in person and you hold shares as the stockholder of record, you may come to the 2015 Annual Meeting and cast your vote there. However, if you are a beneficial owner and you wish to vote your shares in person, you must bring a legal proxy from the record holder of your shares (your broker, bank, or other nominee) indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on the Record Date. In either case, you should also bring a valid photo identification to the meeting.
If you wish to vote your shares without attending the meeting, you may do so in one of the following ways:
|
•
|
Internet
. If you hold shares as the stockholder of record, you can submit a proxy over the Internet to vote those shares at the 2015 Annual Meeting by accessing the website shown on the proxy card you received from us and following the instructions provided. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may or may not permit you to provide them with instructions over the Internet for how to vote your shares; please refer to
|
2
the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee on the voting instruction card you received from your broker, bank or other nominee.
|
•
|
Telephone
.
If you hold shares as the stockholder of record, you can submit a proxy over the telephone to vote your shares by following the instructions provided in the Notice you received from us, or if you received a printed version of the proxy materials by mail, by following the instructions provided with the proxy card you received from us. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may or may not permit you to provide them with instructions over the phone for how to vote your shares; please refer to the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee on the voting instruction card you received from your broker, bank or other nominee.
|
|
•
|
Mail
.
You may submit a proxy or voting instructions by mail to vote your shares at the 2015 Annual Meeting. Please mark, date, sign and return the proxy card or voting instruction card enclosed with the proxy materials you received from us or from your broker, bank or other nominee.
|
Q: Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice?
A:
No. The Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the 2015 Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote by Internet and how to request paper copies of the proxy materials. It is not the same as a proxy card from us or a voting instruction card from your broker, bank, or other nominee.
Q: Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
A:
Yes, if you are a stockholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the 2015 Annual Meeting by:
|
•
|
notifying our Corporate Secretary in writing before the 2015 Annual Meeting that you have revoked your proxy;
|
|
•
|
signing and delivering a later dated proxy to our Corporate Secretary;
|
|
•
|
voting by using the Internet or the telephone (your last Internet or telephone proxy is the one that is counted); or
|
|
•
|
voting in person at the 2015 Annual Meeting.
|
Any such written notice or later dated proxy must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 24, 2015, if you are notifying us in writing, or before the vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting, if you are attending the 2015 Annual Meeting in person.
If you are a beneficial owner, you may submit new voting instructions only by contacting your bank, broker, or other nominee.
Q: What will happen if I do not instruct my bank, broker, or other nominee how to vote?
A:
If you are a beneficial owner and you do not instruct your bank, broker, or other nominee how to vote, your bank, broker, or other nominee may vote your shares at its discretion on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. The ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 2) is the only routine matter being presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting. Thus, if you do not otherwise instruct your bank, broker, or other nominee, they may vote your shares “FOR” Proposal No. 2.
Conversely, all of the other proposals being presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting are non-routine matters, and banks, brokers, and other nominees cannot vote on these matters without instructions from the beneficial owner. Without your voting instructions on these matters, a “broker non-vote” will occur. Shares held by banks, brokers, or other nominees that do not have discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares on non-routine matters are not counted or deemed to be present or represented for the purpose of determining whether stockholders have approved a particular matter, but will be counted in determining whether a quorum is present at the 2015 Annual Meeting. See “—Q: How are votes counted?” below for more information.
Q: Who are the proxies and what do they do?
A:
The persons named as proxies in the proxy materials, Dan Bodner, our Chief Executive Officer, Douglas Robinson, our Chief Financial Officer, and Peter Fante, our Chief Legal Officer and Chief Compliance Officer, were designated by the board of directors to vote the shares of holders who are not able or not eligible to vote their shares in person at the 2015 annual meeting, based on valid proxies received by us.
3
Q: How are votes counted?
A:
The shares represented by all valid proxies received will be voted in the manner specified on the proxies. If you are a stockholder of record and you sign, date, and return your proxy card without making specific choices, the persons named as proxies above will vote your shares in accordance with the recommendations of the board of directors. If you are a beneficial holder, your bank, broker, or other nominee must vote for you (unless you obtain a legal proxy from the record holder), and as noted above, if you do not provide specific voting instructions, your bank, broker, or other nominee will only be able to vote on your behalf on routine matters. As a result, you are urged to specify your voting instructions by marking the appropriate boxes on the enclosed proxy card or on your voting instruction card, as applicable.
Q: Will any other matters be voted on?
A:
We are not aware of any other matters that will be brought before the stockholders for a vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting, your proxy will authorize your appointed proxies to vote for you on such matters using their discretion.
Q: How many shares must be present to hold the 2015 Annual Meeting?
A:
Holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock as of the Record Date must be represented in person or by proxy at the 2015 Annual Meeting in order to conduct business. This is called a quorum. If you vote, your shares will be part of the quorum. Abstentions, “withhold” votes, and broker non-votes also will be counted in determining whether a quorum exists.
Q: What vote is required to approve each proposal?
A:
So long as there is a quorum, the voting requirement for each of the proposals is as follows:
|
•
|
Election of Directors - the election of directors will be made by a plurality of votes cast at the 2015 Annual Meeting. That means the seven nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Because directors need only be elected by a plurality of the vote, abstentions, broker non-votes, and withheld votes will not affect whether a particular nominee has received sufficient votes to be elected.
|
|
•
|
Ratification of independent registered public accountants - the proposal for the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2016 will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is considered a routine matter on which banks, brokers, or other nominees may vote if no instructions are provided by the stockholder, however, abstentions will count as votes against the proposal.
|
|
•
|
Approval of the Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan - the proposal to approve the Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Broker non-votes will not affect whether this proposal is approved, however, abstentions will count as votes against this proposal.
|
|
•
|
Approval of the compensation of the named executive officers - the advisory vote regarding the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Broker non-votes will not affect whether this proposal is approved, however, abstentions will count as votes against this proposal.
|
Q: Where can I find the voting results of the meeting?
A:
The preliminary voting results will be announced at the meeting. The final voting results will be reported in a current report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC within four business days after the meeting. If our final voting results are not available within four business days after the meeting, we will file a current report on Form 8-K reporting the preliminary voting results and subsequently file the final voting results in an amendment to the current report on Form 8-K within four business days after the final voting results are known to us.
Q: Who is paying the costs of soliciting these proxies?
A:
The expense of this solicitation, including the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the various proxy materials, will be borne by us. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, some of our officers and regular employees, without
4
extra remuneration, may solicit proxies personally, by telephone or otherwise. In addition, arrangements will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy cards and proxy materials to their principals, and we may reimburse them for their expenses in forwarding these materials.
Q: What do I need to do to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting?
A:
You are entitled to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner of our shares as of the close of business on May 1, 2015. You should be prepared to present photo identification for admittance. If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or nominee and you wish to attend the meeting, you will need to provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date, such as your most recent account statement prior to May 1, 2015, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee, or similar evidence of ownership. If you are not a stockholder of record, note that you will not be able to vote your shares at the meeting unless you have a legal proxy from your broker. If you do not provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the 2015 Annual Meeting.
5
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
All of our directors are elected at each annual meeting to serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified or their earlier death, resignation, or removal. The board of directors has nominated the persons named below, each of whom is presently serving on our board of directors, for election as directors. As of the date of this proxy statement, the board of directors consists of seven directors and two vacancies. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named below.
Each of the nominees was recommended for reelection by the corporate governance & nominating committee and has been approved by the board of directors. Each of the nominees has consented to serve for the new term if elected. If any nominee becomes unavailable to serve for any reason before the election, which is not anticipated, your proxy authorizes us to vote for another person nominated by the board of directors. The election of directors will be made by a plurality of votes cast at the 2015 Annual Meeting. That means the seven nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Because directors need only be elected by a plurality of the vote, abstentions, broker non-votes, and withhold votes will not affect whether a particular nominee has received sufficient votes to be elected.
As described in detail below, our nominees have considerable professional and business experience. The recommendation of our board of directors is based on its carefully considered judgment that the experience, record, and qualifications of our nominees make them well qualified to serve on our board of directors. The board of directors believes that each of the nominees listed brings strong skills and extensive experience to the board of directors, giving the board of directors as a group the appropriate skills to exercise its oversight responsibilities.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Position(s)
|
|||
|
Dan Bodner
|
56
|
1994
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and Director
|
|||
|
Victor DeMarines
|
78
|
2002
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|||
|
John Egan
|
57
|
2012
|
Director
|
|||
|
Larry Myers
|
76
|
2003
|
Director
|
|||
|
Richard Nottenburg
|
61
|
2013
|
Director
|
|||
|
Howard Safir
|
73
|
2002
|
Director
|
|||
|
Earl Shanks
|
58
|
2012
|
Director
|
|||
Dan Bodner
serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and a director. Mr. Bodner has served as our President and/or Chief Executive Officer and as a director since 1994. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Bodner also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Comverse Government Systems Corp., a former affiliate of ours. Prior to such positions, from 1987 to 1991, Mr. Bodner held various management positions at Comverse Technology, Inc. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Bodner’s position as our Chief Executive Officer, his intimate knowledge of our operations, assets, customers, growth strategies, and competitors, his knowledge of the technology, software, and security industries, and his extensive management experience give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Victor DeMarines
has served as a director since 2002 and as Chairman of the Board since February 2013. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. DeMarines served as President and Chief Executive Officer of MITRE Corporation, a nonprofit organization, which provides security solutions for the computer systems of the Department of Defense, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, the Internal Revenue Service, and several organizations in the U.S. intelligence community. Mr. DeMarines also served as a director of MITRE Corporation from 2000 to 2010 and presently serves as a consultant to MITRE. Mr. DeMarines also currently serves as a director of NetScout Systems, Inc., a provider of network performance solutions (“NetScout”). He serves on the NetScout compensation and governance committees and is chairman of the NetScout finance committee. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. DeMarines’ financial and business expertise, including his diversified background of managing a security-based company, serving as a chief executive officer, and serving as a director of a public technology company, gives him the qualifications and skills to serve as Chairman of the Board.
John Egan
has served as a director since August 2012. Mr. Egan has been a managing partner and general partner of Egan-Managed Capital, a venture capital firm, since 1998. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Egan served as the Executive Vice President, Products and Offerings of EMC Corporation (“EMC”) and from 1992 to 1996 he served as Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing of EMC. From 1986 to 1992, Mr. Egan held various executive roles with EMC, including Executive Vice President, Operations, and Executive Vice President, International Sales. Mr. Egan has served as a director of (i) EMC since 1992, where
6
he is currently the chairman of the mergers and acquisitions committee and a member of the finance committee, (ii) VMWare Inc. since 2007, where he is currently the chairman of the mergers and acquisitions committee, (iii) NetScout since 2001, where he is currently lead director, a member of the audit committee and a member of the nominating and governance committee, and (iv) Progress Software Corporation since 2011, where he is currently the non-executive chairman of the board, a member of the compensation committee, and a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee. We believe Mr. Egan's financial and business expertise, including a diversified background of managing and serving as a director of several public technology companies and expertise in mergers and acquisitions, gives him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Larry Myers
has served as a director since 2003. From 1991 to 1999, Mr. Myers served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of MITRE Corporation, a nonprofit organization that provides security solutions for the computer systems of the Department of Defense, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, the Internal Revenue Service, and several organizations in the U.S. intelligence community. Prior to that, Mr. Myers served as Controller for Fairchild Industries, Inc. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Myers’ financial and business expertise, including his background of managing a security-based company, and his deep financial expertise in serving as a chief financial officer, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Richard Nottenburg
has
served as a director since February 2013, having previously served as a director of Verint from July 2011 to November 2011. Dr. Nottenburg, an investor in early stage technology companies and a business consultant, served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of Sonus Networks, Inc. from 2008 through 2010. From 2004 until 2008, Dr. Nottenburg was an officer with Motorola, Inc., ultimately serving as its Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer and Chief Technology Officer. Dr. Nottenburg is currently a member of the boards of directors of PMC Sierra, Inc. (where he is also a member of the audit committee), and Violin Memory Inc. (where he is Chairman, and a member of the compensation committee and the corporate governance and nominating committee). He was a member of the board of directors of Comverse Technology, Inc. from 2006 to 2011. The board of directors has concluded that Dr. Nottenburg's financial and business expertise, including his diversified background of managing technology companies, serving as a chief executive officer, and serving as a director of public technology companies, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Howard Safir
has served as a director since 2002. Since 2010, Mr. Safir has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of VRI Technologies LLC, a security consulting and law enforcement integrator. From 2001 until 2010, Mr. Safir served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SafirRosetti, a provider of security and investigation services and a wholly owned subsidiary of Global Options Group Inc. Mr. Safir served as the Vice Chairman of Global Options Group Inc. from its 2005 acquisition of SafirRosetti until 2010. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Bode Technology, also a wholly owned subsidiary of Global Options Group Inc., from 2007 to 2010. Mr. Safir currently serves as a director of Implant Sciences Corporation, an explosives device detection company, and LexisNexis Special Services, Inc., a leading provider of information and technology solutions to governments. During his career, Mr. Safir served as the 39th Police Commissioner of the City of New York, as Associate Director for Operations, U.S. Marshals Service, and as Assistant Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration. Mr. Safir was awarded the Ellis Island Medal of Honor among other citations and awards. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Safir’s extensive law enforcement background and his financial and business expertise, including a diversified background of managing and serving as a director of public technology and security-based companies and serving as a chief executive officer, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Earl Shanks
has served as a director since July 2012. Mr. Shanks served as the Chief Financial Officer at Convergys Corporation, a global leader in relationship management solutions and a major provider of outsourced business services from 2003 until 2012. From 1996 to 2003, Mr. Shanks held various financial leadership roles with NCR Corporation, ultimately serving as the Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2003 where he oversaw treasury, finance, real estate, tax, and six business unit finance teams. Mr. Shanks also served as chairman of the board of directors of NCR Japan, a publicly traded corporation, from 1998 to 2001. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Shanks served as the Vice President and Treasurer of Farley Industries, a private equity firm, and Fruit of the Loom Inc., an apparel manufacturer. From 1983 to 1991, he served in various tax leadership roles at Farley Industries and Fruit of the Loom Inc. The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Shanks’ financial and business expertise, including his deep financial expertise serving as a chief financial officer of a public company, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
For stockholders of record, if no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will vote FOR this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
7
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The audit committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2016. The audit committee has directed that such appointment be submitted to our stockholders for ratification at the 2015 Annual Meeting. Deloitte & Touche LLP was Verint’s firm of independent registered public accountants for the year ended January 31, 2015.
Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants is not required. The audit committee, however, is submitting the appointment to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the audit committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Deloitte & Touche LLP or to appoint another firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the audit committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different accounting firm at any time during the year ending January 31, 2016 if the audit committee determines that such a change would be in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the 2015 Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The proposal for the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Verint’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending January 31, 2016 will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is considered a routine matter on which banks, brokers, or other nominees may vote if no instructions are provided by the stockholder, however, abstentions will count as votes against the proposal.
For stockholders of record, if no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will vote FOR this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL NO. 2.
8
PROPOSAL NO. 3
APPROVAL OF
THE VERINT SYSTEMS INC. 2015 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
We currently have two active equity compensation plans. The Verint Systems Inc. 2010 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2010 Plan”) was approved by our board of directors on August 3, 2010 (subject to the approval of our stockholders) and by our stockholders on October 5, 2010, with a subsequent amendment approved by our stockholders on June 15, 2012 primarily to increase the available capacity under such plan and extend its expiration date. In February 2013, in connection with our acquisition of our former parent company, Comverse Technology, Inc., we assumed the Comverse Technology, Inc. Stock Incentive Compensation Plan (the “CTI Plan”). All equity compensation plans previously maintained by us other than the 2010 Plan and CTI Plan have been terminated or have expired (however, such terminated or expired plans continue to govern the terms of outstanding awards previously granted under such plans).
On May 12, 2015, our board of directors approved (subject to the approval of our stockholders) the Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan would provide for the award of up to 9,700,000 shares of common stock. The 2015 Plan contains a so-called fungible ratio, such that each stock option or stock-settled stock appreciation right granted under the 2015 Plan will reduce the available plan capacity by one share and each other award denominated in shares that is granted under the 2015 Plan will reduce the available plan capacity by 2.29 shares.
If the 2015 Plan is approved by our stockholders, the 2010 Plan and the CTI Plan will be terminated concurrently with the stockholders' approval of the 2015 Plan, meaning that all 3,910,437 million shares available under the 2010 Plan and the CTI Plan as of April 30, 2015 will be cancelled. Although no new shares may be granted under the 2010 Plan or the CTI Plan, following the stockholders' approval of the 2015 Plan, all previously granted shares would continue to be governed by the applicable plan.
Equity Plan Information as of April 30, 2015
As of April 30, 2015:
|
•
|
There were a total of 61,358,001 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.
|
|
•
|
There were a total of 2,769 stock options outstanding, with an average exercise price of $9.49 and an average remaining term of 4.98 years.
|
|
•
|
There were a total of 3,404,343 restricted stock units outstanding, including 446,900 performance based restricted stock units, at target achievement, or a total of 3,710,136 restricted stock units outstanding, including 752,693 performance based restricted stock units, at maximum achievement.
|
|
•
|
There were a total of 3,910,437 shares available for future award under our two active equity compensation plans, 1,756,967 of which were under the 2010 Plan and 2,153,470 of which were under the CTI Plan.
|
|
•
|
Our “burn rate” measures the number of shares under outstanding equity awards granted during a given year (disregarding cancellations), as a percentage of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for that fiscal year. It measures the potential dilutive effect of annual equity grants. Over the past three years, our burn rate was 2.9%, 2.9% and 2.6% (for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively).
|
|
•
|
Over the past three years, our average annual dilution was 6.2%, 5.2% and 4.4% (for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively). “Dilution” is measured as the total number of shares under all outstanding equity awards (i.e., share awards granted, less share award cancellations), as a percentage of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for that fiscal year.
|
|
•
|
Over the past three years, our “overhang rate” was 19.2%, 17.5% and 13.3% (for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively). Our overhang rate measures the total number of shares under all outstanding plan awards, plus the number of shares authorized for future plan awards, as a percentage of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for that fiscal year. It measures the potential dilutive effect of outstanding equity awards and future awards available for grant. If the 2015 Plan is approved by the stockholders, our overhang rate would be 22.6%, based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.
|
9
Reasons Why You Should Vote for Proposal 3
We believe our future success depends on our ability to attract, motivate, and retain high quality employees, directors, and consultants, and that the ability to continue to provide stock-based awards under the 2015 Plan is critical to achieving this success as we compete for talent in an industry in which equity compensation is market practice and is expected by many existing personnel and candidates.
Moreover, we believe that equity compensation motivates employees to create stockholder value because the value employees realize from equity compensation is based on the performance of our stock. Equity compensation also aligns the goals and objectives of our employees with the interests of our stockholders and promotes a focus on long-term value creation.
If the 2015 Plan is not approved, we expect that we would exhaust the remaining available shares under our 2010 Plan in less than a year. Under applicable NASDAQ rules, our ability to utilize the available shares under the CTI Plan is limited to individuals who joined Verint after the February 4, 2013 date on which we assumed that plan, significantly restricting our ability to use such shares. If Proposal 3 is approved, the shares presently available under the CTI Plan would effectively be transferred to the 2015 Plan by virtue of the inclusion of these shares within the proposed capacity of the 2015 Plan and the concurrent termination of the CTI Plan. We could be at a severe competitive disadvantage if we cannot use stock-based awards to recruit and compensate our personnel. This would reduce the alignment between our employees and our stockholders, increase our cash compensation expense, and utilize cash that could otherwise be used to grow our business, make acquisitions, repay debt, or for other corporate purposes.
As a result of the foregoing, we believe it is in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders to adopt the 2015 Plan to provide for additional capacity for awards to current and future employees, directors, and consultants. Our equity compensation practices are benchmarked against market practices and we believe our historical share usage has reflected this. As noted above, as of April 30, 2015, we had 61,358,001 million common shares outstanding. Since 2012 (the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013), we have utilized approximately 1.1 million - 1.5 million shares per year on average in our equity compensation programs, including the reservation of approximately 100,000 shares per year in the event officer performance equity goals are overachieved at maximum levels. All of these awards have been in the form of time or performance-based restricted stock units. Assuming future annual share utilization remains at these levels, the 9,700,000 shares that would be available under the 2015 Plan after its approval (and giving effect to the termination of the 2010 Plan and the CTI Plan and the fungibility ratio described above) would last for approximately three years.
Plan Highlights
Below are some highlights from the 2015 Plan that we feel reflect our commitment to adhering to the best practices set forth by industry standards. We ask that you consider these highlights when casting your vote on Proposal 3.
|
•
|
Reasonable Plan Limits.
Subject to adjustment as described in the 2015 Plan, total awards under the 2015 Plan are limited to 9,700,000 shares of our common stock. These shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing. The 2015 Plan also provides that, subject to adjustment as described in the 2015 Plan:
|
|
◦
|
no participant will be granted awards in the form of stock options and stock appreciate rights under the 2015 Plan for more than 2,000,000 shares of common stock during any one fiscal year;
|
|
◦
|
no participant will be granted a performance award under the 2015 Plan that is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) for more than 2,000,000 shares of common stock during any one fiscal year; and
|
|
◦
|
no non-employee member of our board of directors will be granted awards (including stock options and stock appreciation rights) under the 2015 Plan for more than 500,000 shares of common stock during any one fiscal year.
|
|
•
|
Double-Trigger Vesting.
The 2015 Plan contains a so-called “double-trigger” vesting provision, which generally provides that awards will not be accelerated upon a change in control of us if (i) an acquiror replaces or substitutes outstanding awards in accordance with the requirements of the 2015 Plan and (ii) a participant holding the replacement or substitute award is not involuntarily terminated within two years following the change in control.
|
|
•
|
Independent Plan Administrator
.
The compensation committee, which is composed of independent directors, administers the 2015 Plan, and retains full discretion to determine the number and amount of awards to be granted under the 2015 Plan, subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan.
|
|
•
|
Full Value Awards Weighted More Heavily
.
The settlement of one share pursuant to a full value award is deemed to reduce the authorized share pool under the 2015 Plan by 2.29 shares.
|
10
|
•
|
No Discounted Stock Options
.
The 2015 Plan requires that the exercise price for newly-issued stock options (other than substitute awards) may not be less than the fair market value per share on the date of grant.
|
|
•
|
Prohibition of Dividends or Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Performance Awards.
The 2015 Plan prohibits the current payment of dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to shares underlying performance-based awards prior to the achievement of the applicable performance objectives. Any such dividends or dividend equivalents will be deferred until and contingent upon the achievement of the underlying performance objectives.
|
|
•
|
Stockholder Approval of Material Amendments
.
The 2015 Plan requires us to seek stockholder approval for any material amendments to the 2015 Plan, such as materially increasing benefits accrued to participants and materially increasing the number of shares available.
|
|
•
|
Prohibition on Repricing
.
The 2015 Plan prohibits the repricing of outstanding stock options without stockholder approval (outside of certain corporate transactions or adjustments specified in the 2015 Plan). Similarly, the 2015 Plan does not provide for the repricing of stock appreciation rights.
|
|
•
|
No Transfers of Awards for Value
.
The 2015 Plan requires that no awards granted under the 2015 Plan may be transferred for value, subject to exceptions for certain familial transfers.
|
|
•
|
Our Response to Detrimental Activity by Participants.
The 2015 Plan allows for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award or the forfeiture and repayment of any gain related to an award if a participant engages in activity detrimental to our company.
|
Summary of the 2015 Plan
Set forth below is a summary of the principal features of the 2015 Plan. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms of the 2015 Plan, a copy of which is included in this proxy statement as
Appendix A
.
Purpose
The purpose of the 2015 Plan is to attract and retain employees, directors, and consultants of Verint Systems Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries and to motivate such individuals, provide them with incentives and enable them to participate in our growth and success.
The 2015 Plan authorizes our board of directors to provide equity-based compensation in the form of (1) stock options, including incentive stock options (“ISOs”) entitling the participant to favorable tax treatment under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (2) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), (3) restricted stock, (4) restricted stock units (“RSUs”), (5) performance awards, (6) other stock-based awards (“Other Stock-Based Awards”), and (7) performance compensation awards. Each type of award is described below under “Types of Awards Under the 2015 Plan.”
Each of the awards will be evidenced by an award agreement setting forth the award’s terms and conditions.
The 2015 Plan is designed to comply with the requirements of applicable federal and state securities laws, and the Code, including, but not limited to, the performance-based exclusion from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code for qualifying awards.
Our board of directors believes that it is in our best interest and the best interests of our stockholders to provide for an incentive plan under which compensation awards made to our named executive officers can qualify for deductibility for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the 2015 Plan has been structured in a manner such that awards under it can satisfy the requirements for the performance-based exclusion from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code. In order for awards to satisfy the requirements for the performance-based exclusion from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code, the 2015 Plan (which includes Performance Criteria (as hereinafter defined)) must be approved by our stockholders.
Shares Available Under the 2015 Plan
Subject to adjustment as provided in the 2015 Plan, following the approval of the 2015 Plan, the number of our shares of common stock that may be issued or transferred (1) upon the exercise of stock options or SARs, (2) in payment of restricted stock and released from substantial risks of forfeiture thereof, (3) in payment of RSUs, (4) in payment of performance awards or performance compensation awards that have been earned, (5) as awards to non-employee directors, or (6) as Other Stock-Based Awards, will not exceed 9,700,000.
11
Each stock option or stock-settled stock appreciation right granted under the 2015 Plan would reduce the available plan capacity by one share and each other award denominated in shares that is granted under the 2015 Plan would reduce the available plan capacity by 2.29 shares.
For the avoidance of doubt, all awards granted prior to the date of stockholder approval of the 2015 Plan, under our current or historical equity incentive plans, will be settled under the applicable plan, and such settlement will not reduce the aggregate number of shares of common stock available for issuance or transfer under the 2015 Plan. Shares issued or transferred under the 2015 Plan may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of both.
If any shares of common stock covered by any awards granted under the 2015 Plan are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged, withheld or surrendered or if an award terminates or expires without a distribution of shares of common stock to the participant, those shares will again be available for awards under the 2015 Plan. If two awards are granted together in tandem, the shares underlying any portion of the tandem award which is not exercised or otherwise settled in shares will again be available for awards under the 2015 Plan. Any shares of common stock covered by an award that is settled in cash will again be available for awards under the 2015 Plan. In addition, if a participant elects to give up the right to receive compensation in exchange for shares of common stock based on fair market value, the shares will not count against the aggregate limit described above.
The aggregate number of shares of common stock for which ISOs may be granted will not exceed 5,000,000 of the shares of common stock reserved for purposes of the 2015 Plan. No participant will be granted stock options or SARs, in the aggregate, for more than 2,000,000 shares of common stock during any fiscal year and no participant will be granted performance awards that are intended to be “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, in the aggregate, for more than 2,000,000 shares of common stock (or the cash value thereof) during any fiscal year. Further, no non-employee member of our board of directors will be granted an award for more than 500,000 shares of common stock during any fiscal year.
No Repricing
Repricing of options and SARs or cash payments for the cancellation of “underwater” options or SARs are prohibited without stockholder approval under the 2015 Plan (outside of certain corporate transactions or adjustments specified in the 2015 Plan).
Eligibility
Any employee of, or consultant to, us or any of our subsidiaries (including any prospective employee) and non-employee directors of our board of directors or the board of directors of any of our subsidiaries may be selected to participate in the 2015 Plan. In addition, employees and consultants of our affiliates may be eligible to receive cash-settled performance awards and cash-settled RSUs under the 2015 Plan. The compensation committee, as designated by our board of directors in accordance with the 2015 Plan (the “Committee”), determines which persons will receive awards and the number of shares of common stock subject to such awards. All of our approximately 4,800 personnel, including executive officers and directors, are eligible to participate in the 2015 Plan.
Administration
The 2015 Plan will be administered by the Committee. The Committee must be composed of at least two directors, each of whom is required to be a “non-employee director” (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3) and an “outside director” (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code). In the absence of such a designated committee, our board of directors serves as the Committee. The Committee is authorized to interpret the 2015 Plan and related agreements and other documents.
Types of Awards Under the 2015 Plan
Stock Options
. Stock options may be granted that entitle the participant to purchase shares of common stock at a price not less than fair market value per share at the date of grant. The exercise price is payable (1) in cash, check, or wire transfer at the time of exercise, (2) subject to the company's consent, by the transfer to us of shares of common stock owned by the participant having a value at the time of exercise equal to the total stock option exercise price (the shares must have been owned by the participant for at least 6 months), (3) subject to rules established by the Committee, through delivery of irrevocable instructions to a broker to sell the shares otherwise deliverable upon exercise of the stock option and to deliver to us an amount equal to the aggregate exercise price, (4) subject to any limitations, established by the Committee, through the company's withholding of shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of an option pursuant to a "net exercise" arrangement, (5) by a combination of the foregoing, or (6) by other methods approved by the Committee.
No stock option may be exercisable more than 10 years from the date of grant. Each grant will specify the period of continuous service with us or any of our subsidiaries that is necessary before the stock options will become exercisable. Stock options will be evidenced by an award agreement containing such terms and provisions, consistent with the 2015 Plan, as the Committee may approve.
12
SARs
. A SAR is a right to receive from us an amount equal to the spread between the grant price of the SAR and the value of our shares of common stock on the date of exercise. The Committee has the right to determine whether the amount payable on exercise of a SAR may be paid by us in cash, in shares of common stock, or in any combination thereof. SARs may be granted in tandem with another award, in addition to another award, or freestanding and unrelated to another award. If a SAR is granted in tandem with another award, it may be granted before, at the same time as the other award or at a later time. No SAR may be exercisable more than 10 years from the date of grant.
SARs with a grant price equal to or greater than the fair market value per share as of the date of grant are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. SARs will be evidenced by an award agreement containing such terms and provisions, consistent with the 2015 Plan, as the Committee may approve.
Restricted Stock
. A grant of restricted stock involves the immediate transfer by us to a participant of ownership of a specific number of shares of common stock in consideration of the performance of services. The Committee will determine the participants to whom shares of restricted stock will be granted, the number of shares of restricted stock to be granted to each participant, the duration of the period during which, and any conditions under which, the restricted stock may be forfeited to us, and the other terms and conditions of such awards. Shares of restricted stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise encumbered, except as provided in the award agreement. Upon lapse of the applicable restrictions, we will either deliver the certificates to the participant or the participant’s legal representative, or our transfer agent will remove the restrictions relating to the transfer of such shares.
In the discretion of the Committee, dividends paid on any shares of restricted stock will be paid directly to the participant, withheld by us subject to vesting of the restricted stock pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement, or be reinvested in additional shares of restricted stock.
In the discretion of the Committee, restricted stock grants may, but are not required to, be designated by the Committee as Performance Compensation Awards (as hereinafter defined). Grants of restricted stock will be evidenced by an award agreement containing such terms and provisions, consistent with the 2015 Plan, as the Committee may approve.
RSUs
. A grant of RSUs constitutes an agreement by us to deliver shares of common stock to the participant in the future in consideration of the performance of services. The Committee will determine the participants to whom RSUs will be granted, the number of RSUs to be granted to each participant, the duration of the period during which, and any conditions under which the RSUs may be forfeited to us, and the other terms and conditions of such awards. RSUs may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise encumbered.
Each RSU will have a value equal to the fair market value of a share. RSUs will be paid in cash, shares of common stock, other securities, or other property, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, upon the lapse of the applicable restrictions, or otherwise in accordance with the applicable award agreement.
In the discretion of the Committee, RSU grants may, but are not required to,
be designated by the Committee as Performance Compensation Awards. RSU grants will be evidenced by an award agreement containing such terms and provisions, consistent with the 2015 Plan, as the Committee may approve.
Performance Awards
. The Committee has the authority under the 2015 Plan to grant performance awards. These awards consist of a right which is (i) denominated in cash or shares of common stock, (ii) valued, as determined by the Committee, in accordance with the achievement of performance goals during Performance Periods established by the Committee, and (iii) payable at such time and in such form as determined by the Committee. Each performance award will be subject to one or more specified performance goals that must be met within a specified period determined by the Committee (the “Performance Period”) to earn the performance award. The Committee will determine the amount of any performance award, the length of any Performance Period, and the amount and kind of any payment or transfer to be made pursuant to any performance award. To the extent earned, the performance awards may be paid in a lump sum or in installments following the close of the Performance Period as set forth in the applicable award agreement.
In the discretion of the Committee, performance awards may, but are not required to,
be designated by the Committee as Performance Compensation Awards (as hereinafter defined).
Performance awards will be evidenced by an award agreement containing such terms and provisions, consistent with the 2015 Plan, as the Committee may approve.
Other Awards
. The Committee may grant to a participant an Other Stock-Based Award, which will consist of rights other than those awards described above and which is denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, our shares of common stock (including securities convertible into shares). These awards must comply, to the extent deemed desirable by the Committee, with Rule 16b-3 as promulgated and interpreted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other
13
applicable laws. The Committee will determine the terms and conditions of these awards, including the price, if any, at which shares of common stock may be purchased pursuant to any Other Stock-Based Award granted under the 2015 Plan.
In the discretion of the Committee, Other Stock-Based Awards may, but are not required to,
be designated by the Committee as Performance Compensation Awards (as hereinafter defined). Other Stock-Based Awards will be evidenced by an award agreement containing such terms and provisions, consistent with the 2015 Plan, as the Committee may approve.
Performance Compensation Awards
.
The Committee has the authority, at the time of grant of any restricted stock award, RSU award, performance award, or Other Stock-Based Award, to designate such award as a “Performance Compensation Award” in order to qualify such award as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. To qualify as a performance compensation award, the Committee must designate which participants will be eligible to receive Performance Compensation Awards for a particular Performance Period within the first 90 days of the Performance Period (or, if shorter, within the maximum period permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code).
The Committee has full discretion to select the length of such Performance Period, the type of Performance Compensation Awards to be issued, the Performance Criteria (as hereinafter defined) that will be used to establish performance goals, and the kinds and/or levels of the performance goals that will apply and the formula that will be used to determine whether a performance goal has been achieved.
During a Performance Period, one or more objective formulas shall be applied against the relevant performance goal to determine, with regard to the Performance Compensation Award of a particular participant, whether all or some portion of the Performance Compensation Award has been earned for the Performance Period.
Unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, a participant must be employed by us on the last day of a Performance Period to be eligible for payment in respect of a Performance Compensation Award for the applicable Performance Period.
Performance Criteria.
The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish the performance goal(s) will be based on the attainment by us (or one of our subsidiaries, divisions, or operational units) of specific levels of performance. The performance criteria (the “Performance Criteria”) that the Committee may set are limited to specified levels of or growth in the following, whether determined on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis: revenue, operating income, contribution, day sales outstanding, return on net assets, return on stockholders’ equity, return on assets, return on capital, stockholder returns (on an absolute or relative basis), profit margin, operating margin, contribution margin, earnings per share, net earnings, operating earnings, free cash flow, cash flow from operations, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), including adjusted EBITDA, number of customers, operating expenses, capital expenses, customer acquisition costs, share price, sales, bookings, or market share.
If the Committee (1) anticipates or determines that any unusual or extraordinary corporate event, transaction, item or development affecting us, (2) anticipates or recognizes any unusual or nonrecurring event that affects us and our financial statements, or (3) anticipates or responds to changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles or business conditions, then the Committee is authorized at any time during the first 90 days of a Performance Period, or at any time thereafter (but only to the extent the exercise of such authority after the first 90 days of a Performance Period would not cause the Performance Compensation Awards granted to any participant for the Performance Period to fail to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code), to adjust or modify the calculation of a performance goal for the Performance Period to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants.
Dividends
In the sole discretion of the Committee, a restricted stock award, RSU award, performance award, or an Other Stock-Based Award may provide the participant with dividends or dividend equivalents, payable in cash, shares of common stock, other securities, or other property on a current or deferred basis. In the case of awards with respect to which any applicable Performance Criteria have not been achieved, dividend equivalents may be paid only on a deferred basis, to the extent the underlying award vests.
Amendments
Our board of directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the 2015 Plan without further approval by our stockholders, except where (i) the amendment would materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the 2015 Plan, (ii) the amendment would materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under the 2015 Plan, (iii) the amendment would materially modify the requirements for participation in the 2015 Plan, or (iv) stockholder approval is required by applicable law or NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC rules and regulations. If any amendment, alteration, suspension,
14
discontinuance, or termination of the 2015 Plan would impair the rights of any participant, holder, or beneficiary of a previously granted award, the amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance, or termination will not be effective with respect to such person without the written consent of the affected participant, holder, or beneficiary.
Change in Control
In the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the 2015 Plan), to the extent outstanding awards under the 2015 Plan are not assumed, converted or replaced, all outstanding awards then held by a participant which are unexercisable or otherwise unvested will automatically be deemed exercisable or otherwise vested, as the case may be, and any specified performance goals will be deemed to be satisfied at target, immediately prior to the consummation of such change in control, unless the applicable award agreement provides to the contrary.
To the extent outstanding awards are assumed, converted or replaced in the event of a change in control, (i) any outstanding awards that are subject to performance goals will be assumed, converted, or replaced as if target performance had been achieved as of the date of the change in control, (ii) each performance award or Performance Compensation Award with service requirements will continue to vest with respect to such requirements during the remaining period set forth in the award agreement, and (iii) all other awards shall continue to vest (and/or the restrictions thereon shall continue to lapse) during the remaining period set forth in the applicable award agreement. If outstanding awards are assumed, converted, or replaced, if a participant’s employment or service with us or a subsidiary is terminated without cause (as defined in the 2015 Plan) or a participant terminates his or her employment or service with us or a subsidiary for good reason (as defined in the 2015 Plan) during the two year period following a change in control, all outstanding awards held by the participant that may be exercised will become fully exercisable and all restrictions will lapse and the awards will become vested and non-forfeitable.
Detrimental Activity and Clawback
The Committee may provide for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award or the forfeiture and repayment of any gain related to an award, or other provisions intended to have a similar effect, upon terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee from time to time, if a participant, during his or her employment or other service with us or a subsidiary engages in activity detrimental to our company. In addition, the Committee may also provide for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award or the forfeiture and repayment to us of any gain related to an award, or other provisions intended to have a similar effect, upon such terms and conditions as may be required by the Committee or under Section 10D of the Exchange Act, as amended, or any applicable rules or regulations of the SEC or any national securities exchange or national securities association on which our common stock may be traded.
Transferability
Each award under the 2015 Plan, and each right under any award, shall be exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant or by the participant’s guardian or legal representative. No award may be transferred except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, except that the Committee may in the applicable award agreement or in an amendment to the award agreement provide that certain vested stock option awards may be transferred by the participant without consideration to certain family members, to certain trusts, or to specified types of partnerships, corporations, or limited liability companies on notice to and consent of the Committee. The participant remains liable for any withholding taxes required to be withheld upon the exercise of such stock option by the permitted transferee.
Adjustments
In the event that the Committee determines that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares of common stock, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of shares of common stock or our other securities, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase shares of common stock or our other securities, or other corporate transaction or event affects the shares of common stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2015 Plan, then the Committee shall equitably adjust any or all of (i) the number of our shares of common stock or other securities (or number and kind of other securities or property) with respect to which awards may be granted, (ii) the number of our shares of common stock or other securities (or number and kind of other securities or property) subject to outstanding awards, and (iii) the grant or exercise price with respect to any award or, if deemed appropriate, make provision for a cash payment to the holder of an outstanding award in consideration for the cancellation of such award, which, in the case of stock options and SARs shall equal the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the share subject to each such stock option or SAR over the per share exercise price or grant price of such stock option or SAR.
The Committee is also authorized to make equitable adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, all outstanding awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in the
15
previous paragraph) affecting us, any of our subsidiaries, our financial statements or those of any of our subsidiaries, or of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2015 Plan.
Withholding Taxes
To the extent that we are required to withhold federal, state, local, or foreign taxes in connection with any payment made or benefit realized by a participant or other person under the 2015 Plan, and subject to Section 409A of the Code, we have the right to withhold from any award or from any compensation or other amount owing to a participant the amount (in cash, shares of common stock, other securities, other awards under the 2015 Plan or other property) of applicable withholding taxes and to take other action as may be necessary to satisfy all obligations for payment of such taxes. Subject to the foregoing, and contingent upon the company's consent, a participant may satisfy the withholding liability by delivering shares of common stock owned by the participant (which are not subject to any pledge or other security interest and which have been held by the participant for at least six months) with a fair market value equal to the withholding liability or have us withhold from the shares of common stock otherwise deliverable pursuant to an award, a number of shares of common stock equal to the withholding liability.
Compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
To the extent applicable, it is intended that the 2015 Plan and any grants made thereunder comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, so that the income inclusion provisions of Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code do not apply to the participants. The 2015 Plan and any grants made under the 2015 Plan will be administered in a manner consistent with this intent.
Termination
No grant will be made under the 2015 Plan more than 10 years after the date on which the 2015 Plan is first approved by our board, but all grants made on or prior to such date will continue in effect thereafter subject to the terms thereof and of the 2015 Plan.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a brief summary of some of the federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the 2015 Plan based on federal income tax laws in effect on January 1, 2015. This summary is not intended to be complete and does not describe state or local tax consequences. It is not intended to be tax guidance to participants in the 2015 Plan.
Tax Consequences to Participants
Non-qualified Stock Options.
In general, (1) no income will be recognized by a participant at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted; (2) at the time of exercise of a non-qualified stock option, ordinary income will be recognized by the participant in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price paid for the shares of common stock and the fair market value of the shares, if unrestricted, on the date of exercise; and (3) at the time of sale of shares of common stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, appreciation (or depreciation) in value of the shares after the date of exercise will be treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on how long the shares have been held.
Incentive Stock Options.
No income generally will be recognized by a participant upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option (ISO). The exercise of an ISO, however, may result in alternative minimum tax liability. If shares of common stock are issued to the participant pursuant to the exercise of an ISO, and if no disqualifying disposition of such shares is made by such participant within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the transfer of such shares to the participant, then upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price will be taxed to the participant as a long-term capital gain and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss.
If shares of common stock acquired upon the exercise of an ISO are disposed of prior to the expiration of either holding period described above (i.e. disqualifying disposition), the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of such shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of such shares if a sale or exchange) over the exercise price paid for such shares. Any further gain (or loss) realized by the participant generally will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on the holding period.
16
SARs.
No income will be recognized by a participant in connection with the grant of a SAR. When the SAR is exercised, the participant normally will be required to include as taxable ordinary income in the year of exercise an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any unrestricted shares of common stock received on the exercise.
Restricted Stock.
The recipient of restricted stock generally will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of the restricted stock (reduced by any amount paid by the participant for such restricted stock) at such time as the shares are no longer subject to forfeiture or restrictions on transfer for purposes of Section 83 of the Code (“Restrictions”). However, a recipient who so elects under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the date of transfer of the shares will have taxable ordinary income on the date of transfer of the shares equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares (determined without regard to the Restrictions) over the purchase price, if any, of such restricted stock. If a Section 83(b) election has not been made, any dividends received with respect to restricted stock that is subject to the Restrictions generally will be treated as compensation that is taxable as ordinary income to the participant.
RSUs.
No income generally will be recognized upon the award of RSUs. The recipient of an award of RSUs generally will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of unrestricted shares of common stock on the date that such shares are transferred to the participant under the award (reduced by any amount paid by the participant for such RSUs), and the capital gains/loss holding period for such shares will also commence on such date.
Performance Awards.
No income generally will be recognized upon the grant of performance awards. Upon payment or transfer made under the terms of a performance award, the recipient generally will be required to include as taxable ordinary income in the year of receipt an amount equal to the amount of any cash received and the fair market value of any unrestricted shares of common stock received.
Other Stock-Based Awards
. No income generally will be recognized upon the grant of other Stock-Based Awards. Upon payment of Other Stock-Based Awards, the recipient generally will be required to include as taxable ordinary income in the year of receipt an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any unrestricted shares of common stock received.
Tax Consequences to the Company or Subsidiary
To the extent that a participant recognizes ordinary income in the circumstances described above, we or the subsidiary for which the participant performs services may be entitled to a corresponding deduction provided that, among other things, the income meets the test of reasonableness, is an ordinary and necessary business expense, is not an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and is not disallowed by the $1 million limitation on certain executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.
Registration with the SEC
We intend to file a Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the issuance of the shares of common stock under the 2015 Plan with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as is practicable after approval of the 2015 Plan by our stockholders.
2015 Plan Benefits
Because awards to be granted in the future under the 2015 Plan are at the discretion of the Committee, it is not possible to determine the exact benefits or amounts to be received under the 2015 Plan by our directors, employees (including executive officers), or consultants. All of our executive officers and directors are eligible to participate in the 2015 Plan and thus have a personal interest in the approval of the 2015 Plan.
17
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014 and April 30, 2015:
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|||
|
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1)
|
Number of Securities Remaining for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
|
||||||||
|
Plan Category
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
2,626,497
|
|
(2)
|
$32.00
|
|
5,150,463
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2,626,497
|
|
|
$32.00
|
|
5,150,463
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2015
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|||
|
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1)
|
Number of Securities Remaining for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
|
||||||||
|
Plan Category
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
3,407,112
|
|
(4)
|
$9.49
|
|
3,910,437
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
3,407,112
|
|
|
$9.49
|
|
3,910,437
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The weighted-average exercise price relates to outstanding stock options only (as of the applicable date). Other outstanding awards carry no exercise price and are therefore excluded from the weighted-average exercise price.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Consists of 15,191 stock options and 2,611,306 restricted stock units.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes 265,316 shares available under the Vovici Corporation 2006 Amended and Restated Stock Plan, which plan was assumed in connection with our acquisition of Vovici Corporation in 2011 (and not used other than in connection with such acquisition) and was terminated by our board of directors on May 12, 2015.
|
|
(4)
|
Consists of 2,769 stock options and 3,404,343 restricted stock units.
|
The proposal for the approval of the Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is not considered a routine matter and brokers may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Broker non-votes will not affect whether this proposal is approved, however, abstentions will count as votes against this proposal.
18
For stockholders of record, if no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will vote FOR this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 3.
19
PROPOSAL NO. 4
ADVISORY VOTE ON APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF
THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
At our annual meeting of stockholders held on June 16, 2011, our stockholders approved the recommendation of the board of directors that future stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation should occur once every three years (approved by over 75% of the votes cast) ("say-when-on-pay” vote). Our most recent “say on pay” vote as a result of this triennial schedule occurred last year at our June 26, 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, at which our stockholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the corresponding proxy statement by over 97% of the votes cast. As disclosed in the proxy statement for our June 2014 annual meeting, notwithstanding the triennial “say-when-on-pay” schedule approved by our stockholders, we expect to hold "say-on-pay" votes annually.
Although this say-on-pay vote is an advisory vote only and is not binding on Verint or the board of directors, the compensation committee and the board of directors value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.
As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain the best talent to lead the company by providing incentives to our named executive officers to achieve outstanding performance results, to outperform our direct competitors, and to optimize stockholder value. To support this philosophy, we set target compensation in a range around median and structure our compensation arrangements so that actual pay outcomes will vary (above or below target) based on the performance achieved. The program seeks to align executive compensation with stockholder value on an annual and long-term basis as follows:
|
•
|
Executive pay consists of a mix of base pay, annual bonus, and long-term equity-based incentives;
|
|
•
|
Annual bonuses are based on revenue, profitability, cash flow and individual objectives, are subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned, and are limited to a specified maximum payout;
|
|
•
|
Long-term incentive awards are comprised of a combination of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units, which are designed to link executive compensation with increased stockholder value over time, with the performance-based awards subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned and a specified maximum payout;
|
|
•
|
A significant majority of the total direct compensation of each named executive officer is at-risk or is paid in equity (whose value depends on our stock price), specifically, approximately
90%
for our Chief Executive Officer and approximately
80%
on average for the other named executive officers (calculated based on the value of equity (both time-based and performance-based) plus performance-based bonuses received in the year ended January 31, 2015, as a function of total compensation). Performance-based equity and performance-based bonuses alone accounted for approximately
60%
of our Chief Executive Officer’s total direct compensation and approximately
55%
of the total direct compensation of each of our other named executive officers.
|
20
We also have several governance programs in place to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and mitigate risks in our compensation plans. These programs include:
|
•
|
a clawback policy;
|
|
•
|
stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors;
|
|
•
|
limited perquisites;
|
|
•
|
use of tally sheets and aggregate award summaries to facilitate oversight of executive compensation;
|
|
•
|
a policy prohibiting all personnel (including executive officers and directors) from short selling in our securities, from short-term trades in our securities (open market purchase and sale within three months), and from trading options in our securities;
|
|
•
|
a policy prohibiting hedging or significant pledging in our securities by our executive officers and directors; and
|
|
•
|
a policy precluding us from entering into any new plan, program, agreement, or arrangement providing for a 280G tax gross-up payment with any person or, subject to a limited exception relating to relocations, any other tax gross-up payments with executive officers.
|
Our long-term growth strategy focuses on three important areas of the Actionable Intelligence market: customer engagement optimization, security intelligence, and fraud, risk and compliance. Key initiatives, milestones, and operational results that were reflected in or drove our executive compensation decisions for the year ended January 31, 2015 included:
|
•
|
The launch of our customer engagement optimization strategy, significantly increasing the size of our addressable market, and execution of the new strategy both organically and with the acquisition and integration of KANA Software, Inc. into our enterprise intelligence business;
|
|
•
|
The expansion of our security intelligence portfolio to address cyber security, further increasing the size of our addressable market, and the announcement of and execution on a large cyber security project valued at more than $100 million;
|
|
•
|
Advancing our human capital strategy and continued investment in infrastructure and research and development to support the long-term growth of our business;
|
|
•
|
Completion of a successful capital restructuring to reduce our leverage, diversify our capital structure, reduce interest expense, fix the interest rate on a portion of our debt at historically low levels, and increase our borrowing capacity for future strategic needs;
|
|
•
|
Increase in non-GAAP revenue by
27.3%
, from
$910.0 million
to
$1.16 billion
; and
|
|
•
|
Increase in non-GAAP operating income by
25.2%
, from
$210.0 million
to
$262.9 million
.
|
Based on our review of these and other business and operational results for the year ended January 31, 2015 compared to our corresponding executive compensation decisions, we believe we successfully operated a “pay for performance” executive compensation program for the year, as further discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, including with respect to the following significant actions and key decisions regarding executive compensation for the year ended January 31, 2015:
|
•
|
Increase in base salaries by
3.0%
, generally consistent with our regular company merit increase for the year;
|
|
•
|
No changes to target bonuses based on an assessment that target bonuses were well aligned with market vis-à-vis the compensation peer group as a result of a two-year process of migrating target bonuses towards market levels begun in the year ended January 31, 2013;
|
|
•
|
Award of annual equity grants consistent with our regular compensation review process, including the benchmarking and other factors described below, with 50% of these awards tied to the achievement of performance goals over a two-year performance period;
|
|
•
|
Establishment of executive officer bonus payouts at
100%
of target based on the level of achievement of financial and operational results and individual objectives, including revenue at
104.3%
of our target goal of $1.11 billion, operating income at
101.1%
of our target goal of $260.0 million, and cash flow from operations at
102.6%
of our target goal of $221.0 million, which drove calculated payout levels ranging from approximately 110% to approximately 114%, as
|
21
well as based on internal pay equity considerations between the named executive officers and the broader employee base (who were under different bonus plans); and
|
•
|
Approval of performance vesting levels for previously-granted equity awards at
118.9%
of target based on the level of achievement of our revenue and operating income goals described above.
|
The board of directors strongly endorses our executive compensation program and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion in this proxy statement, is hereby APPROVED.”
The advisory vote regarding the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement will be approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. This is not considered a routine matter and banks, brokers, or other nominees may not vote without instructions from the stockholder. Broker non-votes will not affect whether this proposal is approved, however, abstentions will count as votes against this proposal.
If no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL NO. 4.
22
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the 2015 Annual Meeting other than the items referred to above. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting for action by stockholders, the person or persons voting your shares pursuant to instructions by proxy card will be authorized to vote your shares in accordance with the policies of Verint and will use their discretion accordingly. The chairman of the 2015 Annual Meeting may refuse to allow presentation of a proposal or a nominee for the board of directors if the proposal or nominee was not properly submitted.
23
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines
All of our employees, including our executive officers, are required to comply with our Code of Conduct. Additionally, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and senior officers must comply with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers. The purpose of these corporate policies is to ensure to the greatest possible extent that our business is conducted in a consistently legal and ethical manner. The text of the Code of Conduct and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers is available on our website at
http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies
. We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our policies as required by law.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
The board of directors believes that the person who holds the position of our Chief Executive Officer should also serve as one of our directors. We currently separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board which reflects our belief, at this time, that our stockholders' interests are best served with the day-to-day management and direction of the company under Mr. Bodner's supervision, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and with the experience and perspective brought to the board of directors by Mr. DeMarines, as our Chairman. As directors continue to have more oversight responsibility than ever before, we believe it is beneficial to have a Chairman or a lead director whose sole focus is leading the board, allowing our Chief Executive Officer to focus on running the company. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer is most familiar with our business and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of strategy, while our Chairman, with over a dozen years of experience on our board, provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, presides over meetings of the board of directors, and brings a depth of varied financial and business experience, including managing a security-based company and serving as a director of a public technology company. We believe that separating the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, or the designation of a lead director, also helps create an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management's performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of our board of directors to monitor whether management's actions are in the best interests of Verint and its stockholders. We believe our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman have a good working relationship. The board annually reviews its structure and processes to assess whether changes in facts and circumstances or the company's needs require changes to this structure or these processes.
The board of directors and its committees take an active role in overseeing the assessment and management of our risks. The board of directors believes an effective risk management system will (1) timely identify the material risks that we face, (2) ensure communication of necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the board of directors or relevant committees, (3) facilitate implementation of appropriate and responsive risk management strategies consistent with our risk profile, and (4) integrate risk management into our decision-making.
The board of directors and its committees regularly receive information regarding our financial position, capital structure, operations, strategy, compensation, compliance activities, and risk management from senior management. During its review of such information, the board of directors and its committees discuss, review, and analyze risks associated with each area, as applicable.
|
•
|
The compensation committee discusses, reviews, and analyzes risks associated with our compensation plans and arrangements. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information.
|
|
•
|
The audit committee oversees management of financial and compliance risks, including with respect to financial reporting, credit and liquidity, information security, compliance, potential conflicts of interest, and related party transactions.
|
|
•
|
The corporate governance & nominating committee oversees risks associated with our overall governance practices and the leadership structure of our board of directors.
|
The full board of directors is regularly informed about the activities of its committees through committee reports and other communications, as well as participation in committee meetings by non-committee member directors from time to time. Under the oversight of the board of directors, we have also undertaken a number of enterprise risk assessments over the years, including most recently at the end of 2014 and the beginning of 2015, and have implemented programs designed to help manage the risks to which we are exposed in our business and to align risk-taking appropriately with our efforts to increase stockholder value. For example, we conduct a quarterly survey process which seeks to ensure that material information about our operations, finances, and compliance activities are effectively conveyed to senior management on a timely basis, and have launched an initiative to implement a more formalized, continuous global enterprise risk management process.
24
Director Independence
As required by the NASDAQ Global Select Market's (“NASDAQ”) listing standards, a majority of the members of our board of directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by the board of directors. The board of directors evaluates the independence of its members at least annually and at other appropriate times (e.g., in connection with a change in employment status or other significant status changes) when a change in circumstances could potentially impact the independence or effectiveness of one of our directors.
After review of all relevant transactions and relationships between each director, any of their family members, Verint, our executive officers and our independent registered public accounting firm, the board of directors has affirmatively determined that a majority of our current board is comprised of independent directors. The board of directors has determined that Messrs. DeMarines, Egan, Myers, Nottenburg, Safir and Shanks are “independent” for purposes of NASDAQ's governance listing standards (specifically, NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2)). The remaining member of our current board of directors, Mr. Bodner, does not satisfy these “independence” definitions because he is an executive officer. A discussion of the independence qualifications of our board members under applicable committee standards appears below under "—Committees of the Board of Directors".
Board Attendance
The board of directors held eleven meetings during the year ended January 31, 2015. During that period, each incumbent director attended over 75% of the meetings of the board of directors and the committees on which he served that were held during his tenure as director. As a general matter, all directors are encouraged to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our last Annual Meeting of Stockholders was on June 26, 2014. At that meeting, six of our seven directors then serving on our board of directors were present, either in person or telephonically. All of our board members are expected to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting, either in person or telephonically. Our independent directors periodically hold executive sessions outside the presence of management.
Communication with the Board of Directors
Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with our board of directors, a board committee, or with an individual director may do so by sending an email to boardofdirectors@verint.com or writing to such group or persons at:
Verint Systems Inc.
330 South Service Road
Melville, New York 11747
Attention: Corporate Secretary
Communications should specify the addressee(s) and the general topic of the communication. Our Corporate Secretary will review and sort communications before forwarding them to the addressee(s); however, typically, we do not forward communications from our stockholders or other parties which are of a personal nature or are not related to the duties and responsibilities of the board, including junk mail and mass mailings, complaints by customers concerning our products or services, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, opinion surveys and polls, or business solicitations or advertisements.
Concerns relating to accounting or auditing matters or possible violations of our Code of Conduct or our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers should be reported pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Code of Conduct and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers, as applicable, which are available on our website at
http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies
.
Committees of the Board of Directors
As of the date of this proxy statement, the board of directors consists of seven directors and has three standing committees to assist it in carrying out its obligations: the corporate governance & nominating committee, the audit committee, and the compensation committee.
Each standing committee has adopted a formal charter that describes in detail its purpose, organizational structure, and responsibilities. Copies of the committee charters for our corporate governance & nominating committee, audit committee, and compensation committee can be found on our website at
http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies
. The members of the respective committees satisfy the applicable qualification requirements of the SEC, NASDAQ and the respective charter.
A description of each committee and its membership follows.
25
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee
For the year ended January 31, 2015, our corporate governance & nominating committee consisted of Messrs. Egan (Chair), DeMarines, and Safir. The current members of our corporate governance & nominating committee are all independent directors within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards.
The corporate governance & nominating committee met four times during the year ended January 31, 2015.
The corporate governance & nominating committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, among other things:
|
•
|
responsibility for establishing our corporate governance guidelines;
|
|
•
|
overseeing the board of director’s operations and effectiveness; and
|
|
•
|
identifying, screening, and recommending qualified candidates to serve on the board of directors.
|
The corporate governance & nominating committee of the board of directors makes recommendations on director nominees to the board of directors and will consider director candidate recommendations from a variety of sources, including director candidates suggested by existing directors and by stockholders, if properly submitted in accordance with the applicable procedures set forth in our by-laws. For a description of the process for nominating directors in accordance with our by-laws, please refer to “Stockholder Proposals for the 2016 Annual Meeting” in this proxy statement. Pursuant to our corporate governance guidelines contained within our corporate governance & nominating committee charter, the corporate governance & nominating committee will seek members from diverse professional and personal backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with the highest ethical character and who share the values of Verint. The assessment of director candidates includes an evaluation of an individual’s independence, as well as consideration of diversity, age, high personal and professional ethical standards, sound business judgment, personal and professional accomplishment, background, and skills in the context of the needs of the board of directors. In connection with its annual review of its charter, the corporate governance & nominating committee assesses the effectiveness of its selection criteria set forth in our corporate governance guidelines. The composition of the current board of directors reflects diversity in business and professional experience, skills, and age among our directors.
Audit Committee
We have a separately designated standing audit committee as contemplated by Section 10A of the Exchange Act. For the year ended January 31, 2015, our audit committee consisted of Messrs. Myers (Chair), DeMarines, Safir, and Shanks. The audit committee oversees the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm, reviews our annual financial statements and the scope of annual audits, and considers matters relating to accounting policies and internal controls.
Each member of the audit committee meets the independence criteria prescribed by applicable regulation and the rules of the SEC for audit committee membership and is an “independent director” within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards. Each audit committee member meets NASDAQ's financial sophistication requirements, and the board of directors has further determined that Messrs. Myers and Shanks are “audit committee financial experts” as such term is defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. Stockholders should understand that this designation is an SEC disclosure requirement relating to Mr. Myers' and Mr. Shanks' experience and understanding of certain accounting and auditing matters, which the SEC has stated does not impose on the director so designated any additional duty, obligation, or liability than otherwise is imposed generally by virtue of serving on the audit committee and/or the board of directors.
The audit committee met five times during the year ended January 31, 2015.
The audit committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, among other things:
|
•
|
assisting the board of directors in its oversight of our compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, which includes oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial reporting, internal controls, and audit functions as well as general risk oversight; and
|
|
•
|
direct and sole responsibility for appointing, retaining, compensating, and monitoring the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm.
|
A separate report of the audit committee is included in this proxy statement.
26
Compensation Committee
For the year ended January 31, 2015 (through March 20, 2014), our compensation committee consisted of Messrs. Nottenburg (Chair), Safir, and Shanks, with Mr. Egan joining the committee effective March 21, 2014. The board of directors has affirmatively determined that the current members of the compensation committee are all independent directors within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards, and all of the members are “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The compensation committee met six times during the year ended January 31, 2015.
The compensation committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, among other things:
|
•
|
approving compensation arrangements for our executive officers; and
|
|
•
|
administering our stock incentive compensation plans and approving all grants of equity awards, except that equity grants to non-employee directors are approved by the full board of directors unless the board of directors delegates such authority to the compensation committee following its review.
|
The compensation committee has the authority to retain third-party consultants and independent advisors to discharge these responsibilities. The compensation committee assesses the independence and any potential conflicts of interest of compensation advisors in accordance with applicable law and NASDAQ listing standards. Additional discussion regarding the role of third-party consultants, independent advisors, and our executive officers in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation is included in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement.
A separate Compensation Committee Report is also included in this proxy statement.
Current Committee Membership
As of the date of this proxy statement, the membership of each of our standing committees is as follows:
|
Director
|
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee
|
Audit Committee
|
Compensation Committee
|
|
Bodner, Dan
|
|||
|
DeMarines, Victor
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Egan, John
|
X (Chair)
|
X
|
|
|
Myers, Larry
|
X (Chair)
|
||
|
Nottenburg, Richard
|
X (Chair)
|
||
|
Safir, Howard
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
Shanks, Earl
|
X
|
X
|
|
27
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers as of the date of this filing:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position(s)
|
||
|
Dan Bodner
|
56
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and Director
|
||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
59
|
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Officer
|
||
|
Elan Moriah
|
52
|
President, Enterprise Intelligence Solutions and Video and Situation Intelligence Solutions and Corporate Officer
|
||
|
Meir Sperling
|
66
|
Chief Strategy Officer and Corporate Officer (and former President, Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions)
|
||
|
Peter Fante
|
47
|
Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Officer
|
||
Dan Bodner
serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Officer, and a director. Mr. Bodner has served as our President and/or Chief Executive Officer and as a director since 1994. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Bodner also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Comverse Government Systems Corp., a former affiliate of ours. Prior to such positions, from 1987 to 1991, Mr. Bodner held various management positions at CTI.
Douglas Robinson
serves as our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Officer. Mr. Robinson has served in such capacity since late 2006. Prior to joining us, Mr. Robinson spent 17 years at CA Technologies (formerly CA, Inc. and Computer Associates International, Inc.), where he held the positions of Senior Vice President, Finance, Americas Division, Corporate Controller, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Chief Financial Officer of CA’s iCan SP subsidiary, and Senior Vice President Investor Relations, among other positions.
Elan Moriah
serves as President of our Enterprise Intelligence Solutions and Video and Situation Intelligence Solutions global business lines and Corporate Officer. Mr. Moriah has served in such capacity since 2008, having previously served as our President, Americas from 2004 to 2008 and as President of our Contact Center business unit from 2000 to 2004. Prior to joining us, Mr. Moriah held various management positions with Motorola Inc., where he served as Business Development Manager for Europe, Middle East, and Africa, Worldwide Network Services Division and as Vice President of Marketing and Sales of a paging subsidiary. Before then, Mr. Moriah worked for Comet Software Inc., as Vice President of Marketing and Sales and as Operations Manager.
Meir Sperling
serves as our Chief Strategy Officer and Corporate Officer. Mr. Sperling has served as Chief Strategy Officer since May 2013, having previously served as President of our Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions global business line and Corporate Officer from 2000 to April 2013. He also served as President, APAC (Asia Pacific) from 2006 to 2007. Before joining us, Mr. Sperling served as Corporate Vice President of ECI Telecom Ltd. (“ECI”) as General Manager of its Business Systems Division, and Director of several ECI subsidiaries. Before then, Mr. Sperling held various management positions with Tadiran Telecommunications Communications Ltd. as well as with Tadiran Ltd and TEI, a U.S. subsidiary.
Peter Fante
serves as our Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Officer. Mr. Fante was appointed as General Counsel in 2002 (subsequently retitled as Chief Legal Officer) and Chief Compliance Officer in 2008. He previously served as our Secretary from 2005 to early 2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Fante was an associate at various global law firms including Morrison & Foerster LLP, Shearman & Sterling, and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP.
28
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes in detail our named executive officer compensation program and addresses how we made compensation decisions for such officers for the year ended January 31, 2015.
This discussion describes the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and our most important executive compensation decisions for the year ended January 31, 2015, and also provides our analysis of these policies and decisions. We have included certain information in this CD&A (and this section generally) for periods subsequent to January 31, 2015 that we believe may be useful for a more complete understanding of our executive compensation arrangements. While the focus of this discussion is on our compensation arrangements with our named executive officers, in some cases we also provide information about compensation arrangements with our other executives or our employees generally where we believe it may be useful for providing context for our named executive officer compensation arrangements.
Executive Summary
We are a global leader in Actionable Intelligence® solutions. Actionable Intelligence is a necessity in a dynamic world of massive information growth because it empowers organizations with crucial insights and enables decision makers to anticipate, respond, and take action. With our solutions and value-added services, organizations of all sizes and across many industries can make more timely and effective decisions. Today, more than 10,000 organizations in over 180 countries, including over 80 percent of the Fortune 100, use Verint solutions to improve enterprise performance and make the world a safer place. Verint’s vision is to create A Smarter World with Actionable Intelligence®.
The goal of our executive compensation program is to attract and retain the best talent to lead our company. Our philosophy in setting executive compensation is to provide incentives to our named executive officers to achieve outstanding performance results, to outperform our direct competitors, and to optimize stockholder value. To support this philosophy, we set target compensation in a range around median and structure our compensation arrangements so that actual pay outcomes will vary (above or below target) based on the performance achieved. Our executive compensation program seeks to align executive compensation with stockholder value on an annual and long-term basis as follows:
|
•
|
Executive pay consists of a mix of base pay, annual bonus, and long-term equity-based incentives;
|
|
•
|
Annual bonuses are based on revenue, profitability, cash flow, and individual objectives, are subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned, and are limited to a specified maximum payout;
|
|
•
|
Long-term incentive awards are comprised of a combination of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units, which are designed to link executive compensation with increased stockholder value over time, with the performance-based awards subject to a minimum threshold level of performance below which no payout is earned, and a specified maximum payout; and
|
|
•
|
A significant majority of the total direct compensation of each named executive officer is at-risk or is paid in equity (whose value depends on our stock price), specifically, approximately
90%
for our Chief Executive Officer and approximately
80%
on average for the other named executive officers (calculated based on the value of equity (both time-based and performance-based) plus performance-based bonuses received in the year ended January 31, 2015, as a function of total compensation). Performance-based equity and performance-based bonuses alone accounted for approximately
60%
of our Chief Executive Officer's total direct compensation and approximately
55%
of the total direct compensation of each of our other named executive officers.
|
29
We also have several governance programs in place to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and mitigate risks in our compensation plans. These programs include:
|
•
|
a clawback policy;
|
|
•
|
stock ownership guideline for executive officers and directors;
|
|
•
|
limited perquisites;
|
|
•
|
use of tally sheets and aggregate award summaries to facilitate oversight of executive compensation;
|
|
•
|
a policy prohibiting all personnel (including executive officers and directors) from short selling in our securities, from short-term trades in our securities (open market purchase and sale within three months), and from trading options in our securities;
|
|
•
|
a policy prohibiting hedging or significant pledging in our securities by our executive officers and directors; and
|
|
•
|
a policy precluding us from entering into any new plan, program, agreement, or arrangement providing for a 280G tax gross-up payment with any person or, subject to a limited exception relating to relocations, any other tax gross-up payments with executive officers.
|
Results for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
Key initiatives, milestones, and operational results that were reflected in or drove our executive compensation decisions for the year ended January 31, 2015 included:
|
•
|
The launch of our customer engagement optimization strategy, significantly increasing the size of our addressable market, and execution of the new strategy both organically and with the acquisition and integration of KANA Software, Inc. into our enterprise intelligence business;
|
|
•
|
The expansion of our security intelligence portfolio to address cyber security, further increasing the size of our addressable market, and the announcement of and execution on a large cyber security project valued at more than $100 million;
|
|
•
|
Advancing our human capital strategy and continued investment in infrastructure and research and development to support the long-term growth of our business;
|
|
•
|
Completion of a successful capital restructuring to reduce our leverage, diversify our capital structure, reduce interest expense, fix the interest rate on a portion of our debt at historically low levels, and increase our borrowing capacity for future strategic needs;
|
|
•
|
Increase in non-GAAP revenue by
27.3%
, from
$910.0 million
to
$1.16 billion
; and
|
|
•
|
Increase in non-GAAP operating income by
25.2%
, from
$210.0 million
to
$262.9 million
.
|
Pay-for-Performance Results
Based on our review of these and other business and operational results for the year ended January 31, 2015 compared to our corresponding executive compensation decisions, we believe we successfully operated a "pay for performance" executive compensation program for the year, including with respect to the following significant actions and key decisions regarding executive compensation for the year ended January 31, 2015:
|
•
|
Increase in base salaries by
3.0%
, generally consistent with our regular company merit increase for the year;
|
|
•
|
No changes to target bonuses based on an assessment that target bonuses were well aligned with market vis-à-vis the compensation peer group as a result of a two-year process of migrating target bonuses towards market levels begun in the year ended January 31, 2013;
|
|
•
|
Award of annual equity grants consistent with our regular compensation review process, including the benchmarking and other factors described below, with 50% of these awards tied to the achievement of performance goals over a two-year performance period;
|
|
•
|
Establishment of executive officer bonus payouts at 100% of target based on the level of achievement of financial and operational results and individual objectives, including revenue at
104.3%
of our target goal of $1.11 billion, operating income at
101.1%
of our target goal of $260.0 million, and cash flow from operations at
102.6%
of our target goal of $221.0 million, which drove calculated payout levels ranging from approximately 110% to approximately 114%, as
|
30
well as based on internal pay equity considerations between the named executive officers and the broader employee base (who were under different bonus plans); and
|
•
|
Approval of performance vesting levels for previously-granted equity awards at
118.9%
of target based on the level of achievement of our revenue and operating income goals described above.
|
The following discussion should be read together with the information we present in the compensation tables, the footnotes and narratives to those tables, and the related disclosures appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Recent Developments in Executive Compensation Practices
Our compensation committee annually evaluates our compensation practices in light of, among other things, developments in executive compensation and corporate governance, market trends, and competitive factors.
Throughout the second half of 2013 and the beginning of 2014, the compensation committee worked with its consultant, legal advisors, and members of senior management to design a new, long-term performance equity plan. The new plan enhances the long-term focus of our performance equity program, making use of multi-year performance goals, which we believe are an important driver of stockholder value creation. On April 17, 2014, the compensation committee implemented the new design for the first time, granting performance-based RSUs to our named executive officers and certain other executives which vest one-third based on a revenue metric, one-third based on an EBITDA metric, and one-third based on a relative total stockholder return metric (TSR), over a single 2-year performance period. 50% of each named executive officer’s annual equity award was granted in the form of these new performance-based RSUs. This new design replaced our historical performance-equity award design, which vested based on three 1-year performance periods, but which continues to be in place for existing outstanding awards. The new design is not expected to alter our practice of granting equity to our named executive officers on an annual basis.
On April 21, 2015, the compensation committee again granted 50% of each named executive officer’s annual equity award in the form of the new performance-based RSUs (in respect of the establishment of compensation for the year ending January 31, 2016, to be discussed in detail in our spring 2016 proxy statement), however, beginning with the April 2015 awards, an additional one-year vesting period was added (to the 2-year performance period) with respect to one-third of the shares that are ultimately earned, to spread the economic benefit and extend the retentive effect of these awards.
Compensation Philosophy and Design
Philosophy and Objectives of Compensation Program
Our philosophy in setting executive compensation is to provide incentives to our named executive officers to achieve outstanding performance results, to outperform our direct competitors, and to optimize stockholder value. To support this philosophy, we set target compensation in a range around median and structure our compensation arrangements so that actual pay outcomes will vary (above or below target) based on the performance achieved. The compensation committee periodically reviews our compensation philosophy and may make adjustments from time to time based on the needs of the organization.
We believe that our compensation philosophy, including the opportunity to earn above-market compensation for performance in excess of goals, ensures that we are well positioned to attract and retain the highest caliber of executive officer talent and to properly incentivize our executive officers. Our named executive officer compensation packages are generally comprised of a mix of base salary, annual cash bonus, and annual equity grant, plus limited perquisites. We believe this mix of compensation elements allows us to successfully achieve the foregoing compensation objectives, however, as noted above, the compensation committee periodically re-evaluates our compensation philosophy, objectives, and tools and, from time to time, revises or introduces new elements into our executive compensation program.
We believe a significant portion of each executive officer's compensation should be “at-risk” by being tied to the performance of our business or our stock price. We implement this belief through the use of performance-based bonuses and performance-vested equity, for which payment or vesting is directly dependent on performance, as well as through the use of equity-based compensation generally, such as restricted stock units (“RSUs”), the value of which depends on our stock price. We believe that equity-based compensation that is subject to vesting based on continued employment is also an effective tool for retaining our executive officers, aligning their interests with those of our stockholders, and for building long-term commitment to the company. As further discussed below, our executive officers and directors are also subject to stock ownership guidelines.
Roles and Responsibilities in Determining Executive Compensation
The compensation committee establishes our executive officer compensation packages and determines cash payout and performance equity vesting levels for performance-based compensation after the conclusion of the relevant performance period. The compensation committee also administers our equity compensation plans and oversees our long-term incentive programs
31
generally and any special compensation initiatives.
The compensation committee receives updates from its compensation consultant and/or outside counsel at least annually on recent developments and trends in executive compensation and related governance matters to assist it in making compensation decisions.
For the year ended January 31, 2015, the compensation committee engaged Towers Watson to prepare a peer group compensation “benchmarking” analysis for our executive officer compensation packages and to assist the compensation committee in structuring and evaluating proposed executive officer compensation packages as well as year-end payouts. As discussed above, Towers Watson also advised on the design of our new, long-term performance equity plan. Any advice provided by Towers Watson in the year ended January 31, 2015 with respect to non-executive officer or director personnel did not exceed $120,000 in fees and/or was with respect to broad-based plans that do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers or directors and are available generally to all employees. The compensation committee also received advice from outside counsel during the year ended January 31, 2015. In March 2014, the compensation committee reviewed and confirmed the independence of its advisors pursuant to the six-factor test promulgated by the SEC under the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to the compensation period ended January 31, 2015. In March 2015, the compensation committee also reviewed and confirmed the independence of its advisors, applying the same six-factor test, with respect to the compensation period ending January 31, 2016.
In establishing the compensation packages for our named executive officers each year, the compensation committee also reviews the various components and amounts of compensation being considered for each executive officer through the use of “tally sheets” or similar compensation summaries, which facilitate the committee's oversight of executive compensation.
With the compensation committee's permission or at the compensation committee's request, selected members of senior management from our human resources, finance, or legal functions generally work cooperatively with the compensation consultant in preparing proposals for executive officer compensation packages or other executive compensation arrangements for consideration by the compensation committee. The compensation consultant at all times remains independent of management and forms its own views with respect to the recommendations it makes to the compensation committee. The compensation committee also met in executive session (outside the presence of management), both with and without its compensation consultant, during the year ended January 31, 2015.
The Chief Executive Officer also provides input to the compensation committee on each proposed executive officer compensation package. The Chief Executive Officer's input to the compensation committee is based, among other things, on his views of each executive officer's performance, achievements, skills, and responsibilities, competitive factors, and internal pay equity considerations. The Chief Executive Officer's input does not include a recommendation on his own compensation and, notwithstanding his input, the compensation committee in any event exercises independent judgment on executive officer compensation and is solely responsible for final decisions on all matters related to the compensation of all of the named executive officers.
32
Peer Group
The composition of the peer group used for benchmarking analyses prepared by the compensation consultant for the year ended January 31, 2015 was developed following discussions between the compensation committee, Towers Watson, and members of senior management, primarily our Chief Executive Officer. Based on these discussions, for the year ended January 31, 2015, the compensation committee established the following peer group:
|
ACI Worldwide Inc.
|
Mentor Graphics Corp.
|
|
Autodesk Inc.
|
MicroStrategy Inc.
|
|
Cadence Design Systems Inc.
|
MICROS Systems Inc.
|
|
CommVault Systems
|
NetScout Systems, Inc.
|
|
Compuware Corp.
|
Nuance Communications Inc.
|
|
Constellation Software Inc.
|
Pegasystems Inc.
|
|
DST Systems Inc.
|
Open Text Corp.
|
|
Fair Isaac Corporation
|
Red Hat Inc.
|
|
Fortinet Inc.
|
Salesforce.com Inc.
|
|
Informatica
|
Solera Holdings Inc.
|
|
Jack Henry & Associates Inc.
|
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
|
|
MacDonald Dettwiler and Assoc. Ltd.
|
TIBCO Software Inc.
|
The companies included in the peer group were selected by the compensation committee from a sampling of publicly traded software and technology companies with businesses similar to ours and with annual revenues, market capitalizations, and/or enterprise values within a range above and below ours that the compensation committee believed was relevant. Certain of our closest competitors do not fit within these parameters, either because they are much larger or much smaller than us, are privately held, or are foreign issuers who do not publicly file detailed compensation data or have different pay practices due to local market factors outside the U.S. The compensation committee also considers the growth and market leadership profiles of potential peer group companies, competitive considerations with regard to our business, as well as recruiting and retention factors in selecting the peer group, and is mindful of the parameters used by the main proxy advisory firms in establishing their own compensation peer groups. During its annual review, the compensation committee seeks, to the extent practical, to maintain consistency in the peer group in an effort to maintain better comparability from year to year in the results of the benchmarking process.
33
Overview of the Establishment of Executive Officer Compensation for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
In establishing actual cash and equity target award levels for each named executive officer, and the mix between cash compensation and equity compensation, the factors considered by the compensation committee consisted of:
|
•
|
the compensation benchmarking analysis prepared each year by the compensation consultant;
|
|
•
|
the executive officer's compensation for the previous year;
|
|
•
|
relevant terms of the officer's employment agreement;
|
|
•
|
the executive officer's role, responsibilities, and skills;
|
|
•
|
a subjective assessment of the executive officer's performance in the previous year, including special achievements;
|
|
•
|
our performance, based on financial and non-financial metrics, in the previous year, including the performance of our stock over the course of the prior year and over longer-term periods;
|
|
•
|
our growth, based on both financial and non-financial metrics, from the previous year;
|
|
•
|
our outlook and operating plan for the upcoming year;
|
|
•
|
the proposed packages for the other executive officers (internal pay equity);
|
|
•
|
the proposed merit increases, if any, being offered to our employees generally;
|
|
•
|
the size of the aggregate equity pool available for awards for the year and the relative allocation of such pool between the executive officers and the other participants;
|
|
•
|
overall equity dilution and burn rates as well as equity overhang levels;
|
|
•
|
the value of and expense associated with proposed and previously awarded equity grants, including the continuing retentive value of past awards;
|
|
•
|
executive officer recruiting and retention considerations; and
|
|
•
|
compensation trends and competitive factors in the market for talent in which we compete.
|
Elements of compensation were considered by the compensation committee individually and in the aggregate in its decision making process. Although the compensation committee does not target a specific ratio of equity to cash, the compensation committee believes that equity should comprise a majority of each named executive officer’s compensation package in order to foster a greater sense of personal investment in our performance, further aligning executive officer incentives with the interests of our stockholders, and increasing the amount of such executive officer's compensation that is “at risk” by virtue of being dependent on our stock price and/or performance. Subject to the parameters of our compensation philosophy, the compensation committee also believes that it is appropriate for our Chief Executive Officer to be compensated more highly from both a cash and an equity perspective than our other named executive officers, and this approach has been supported by our benchmarking analyses. In establishing the relative compensation of the other named executive officers, the compensation committee takes into account differences in the scope of each officer's role, responsibilities, and skills.
The financial performance goals established by our compensation committee for executive officer bonus plans and performance equity awards are based on our internal budget, which uses non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) measures that our board of directors and senior management find useful in managing our business. See Appendix B to this proxy statement for additional discussion of such non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) contemplated by the budget approved by the board of directors are included in measuring performance against compensation goals. For other extraordinary non-budgeted events, including material M&A not contemplated by the budget, the compensation committee or the board of directors may normalize performance results to ensure comparability with performance goals, unless otherwise provided under the terms of the applicable award, such as the 2013 Special Grants (discussed below), which awards were specifically intended to capture the impact of extraordinary changes to the business, including M&A. Under the new 2-year performance awards granted in April 2014 and April 2015, the board of directors plans to determine whether and to what extent such normalization will be required at the time any such extraordinary transactions are first approved.
34
Elements of Compensation - Establishment and Payouts for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
Base Salary
Base salaries for our named executive officers are subject to adjustment annually by the compensation committee as part of its regular compensation review process based on the benchmarking process and the other factors described above. For the year ended January 31, 2015, executive officer base salaries were increased by
3.0%
, generally consistent with our regular company merit increases for the year.
Establishment of Annual Bonuses
Each of our named executive officers is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus. As with base salaries, target bonuses are established annually by the compensation committee as part of its regular compensation review process described above based on the benchmarking process and the other factors described above.
For the year ended January 31, 2015, target bonus opportunities were not changed based on an assessment that target bonuses were well aligned with market vis-à-vis the compensation peer group as a result of a two-year process of migrating target bonuses towards market levels begun in the year ended January 31, 2013.
Bonus payouts are based on performance by reference to pre-defined performance goals established by the compensation committee as part of the regular compensation review process as well as based on qualitative factors related to each executive officer's achievements and performance review and other factors deemed relevant by the compensation committee.
Performance goals for bonus plans for the year ended January 31, 2015 were based on revenue, operating income, operating cash flow, and the achievement of management business objectives, which we refer to as MBOs. We believe these elements create a well-diversified set of performance goals, including a focus on revenue as our key growth driver, profitability, cash generation, and individual achievement.
MBOs are tailored to each executive officer's function within the company. For the year ended January 31, 2015, the MBOs consisted of qualitative/subjective performance goals (such as devising and implementing strategic or compliance plans or initiatives, successfully integrating acquired companies, improving internal financial processes, assuming new areas of responsibility, or achieving human capital goals), as well as additional quantitative goals such as achievement of operating unit budget targets (for officers with operational responsibility).
Financial performance goals were in the form of a range in which an executive officer could achieve
25%
of his target bonus at the low end of the performance range (or threshold), 100% of his target bonus at the middle of the performance range (target performance), and up to 150% of his target bonus at the high end of the performance range, for each performance goal, with the final bonus calculation based on the combined achievement of all goals. For performance below the applicable threshold, the executive officer was not entitled to any bonus for that goal. For performance falling between established points in the range, the bonus was calculated on a formulaic basis based on those points. MBO goals were measured on a scale of 0% to 100% achievement, with the calculated percentage payout for such metric equal to the percentage level of achievement. The compensation committee's objective in establishing a range was to align the bonus payout with actual performance.
The compensation committee carefully evaluates the proposed financial performance goals, as well as the proposed MBO goals, as part of its annual compensation review process, with a view to setting the financial performance targets (the middle of the performance ranges) and the MBO goals at a level that requires strong performance on the part of each recipient, but that is not so difficult to achieve that it is more likely than not that the executive officer will be unable to reach the goal. The compensation committee also endeavors to set threshold performance levels (and corresponding payout levels) that are reasonable in light of the goal in question and, as noted above, also provides for a cap on maximum payouts, at levels requiring extraordinary levels of achievement.
35
Annual Bonus Payouts for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
The following table summarizes the annual bonus payouts for each executive officer for the year ended January 31, 2015. All financial goals in the annual bonus plans were overachieved, resulting in calculated payout levels ranging from approximately 110% to approximately 114%, however, based on internal pay equity considerations between the named executive officers and the broader employee base (who were under different bonus plans), the compensation committee decided to reduce named executive officer bonus payouts to 100%.
|
Target Bonus
|
Bonus Payout Amounts
|
||||||||||
|
Name
|
In U.S. Dollars
|
In Local Currency
|
Bonus Plan Metric & Weight
|
Financial Target for Bonus Plan Metric
|
Final Payout Percentage
|
In U.S. Dollars (2)
|
In Local Currency
|
||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
$
|
816,000
|
|
N/A
|
Company revenue: 30.0%
|
$1.11 billion
|
100.0%
|
$
|
816,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
Company operating income: 30.0%
|
$260.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
Cash flow: 20.0%
|
$221.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
MBO: 20.0%
|
|||||||||||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
$
|
289,000
|
|
N/A
|
Company revenue: 30.0%
|
$1.11 billion
|
100.0%
|
$
|
289,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
Company operating income: 30.0%
|
$260.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
Cash flow: 20.0%
|
$221.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
MBO: 20.0%
|
|||||||||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
$
|
289,000
|
|
N/A
|
Company revenue: 30.0%
|
$1.11 billion
|
100.0%
|
$
|
289,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
Company operating income: 30.0%
|
$260.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
Cash flow: 20.0%
|
$221.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
MBO: 20.0%
|
|||||||||||
|
Meir Sperling (1)
|
$
|
214,577
|
|
NIS 842,000
|
Company revenue: 30.0%
|
$1.11 billion
|
100.0%
|
$
|
214,577
|
|
NIS 842,000
|
|
Company operating income: 30.0%
|
$260.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
Cash flow: 20.0%
|
$221.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
MBO: 20.0%
|
|||||||||||
|
Peter Fante
|
$
|
221,000
|
|
N/A
|
Company revenue: 30.0%
|
$1.11 billion
|
100.0%
|
$
|
221,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
Company operating income: 30.0%
|
$260.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
Cash flow: 20.0%
|
$221.0 million
|
||||||||||
|
MBO: 20.0%
|
|||||||||||
(1) Shown in U.S. dollars for comparative purposes only, based on the exchange rate at or about the time of the compensation committee's compensation review for the year. As noted in the local currency column, Mr. Sperling's target bonus is set in his local currency and for the year ended January 31, 2015 was NIS 842,000.
(2) The U.S. dollar bonus amount for Mr. Sperling is for comparative purposes only and reflects the impact of applicable exchange rates on the applicable payment date (or date of board approval if payment had not been made as of the date of this proxy statement). The actual payment to Mr. Sperling is made in local currency and appears in the last column.
36
Performance vs. Payout Matrix
(applies to each officer on a goal by goal basis,
based on the officer's individualized bonus plan per the table above)
|
Payout Percentage
|
||||||||
|
0%
|
25%
|
75%
|
90%
|
100%
|
120%
|
140%
|
150%
|
|
|
Achievement Percentage
|
||||||||
|
Percentage of Revenue Goal
|
<87%
|
87%
|
92%
|
97%
|
100%
|
103%
|
105%
|
108%
|
|
Payout Percentage
|
||||||||
|
0%
|
25%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
120%
|
140%
|
150%
|
|
|
Achievement Percentage
|
||||||||
|
Percentage of Operating Income Goal
|
<78%
|
78%
|
83%
|
93%
|
100%
|
105%
|
110%
|
115%
|
|
Percentage of Cash Flow Goal
|
<78%
|
78%
|
83%
|
93%
|
100%
|
105%
|
110%
|
115%
|
The achievement percentage for each of the performance goals listed above was as follows: revenue,
104.3%
; operating income,
101.1%
; and cash flow from operations,
102.6%
.
Establishment of Equity Awards
Each of our named executive officers is eligible to receive an annual equity award. As with base salaries and target bonuses, named executive officer equity grants are established annually by the compensation committee as part of its regular compensation review process described above. For the April 2014 grant (in respect of the establishment of compensation for the year ended January 31, 2015), Mr. Sperling received a smaller grant than in prior years, consistent with his change in role.
The compensation committee endeavors to establish the grant date well in advance of the grant and to schedule vesting dates to occur at a time when we would not normally be in a quarterly trading blackout (to reduce the chances that vesting-related tax events occur during blackout periods). Apart from seeking to schedule vesting dates outside of blackout periods, we do not time our grants by reference to the release of earnings or other material information.
In recent years, we have used RSUs (both time-based and performance-based) as our preferred form of equity award, which provide predictable retention value and alignment of employee interests with stockholder interests, particularly in times of volatile equity markets. The compensation committee periodically reviews the elements of compensation it uses, however, and we may in the future incorporate other award forms, including stock options, in our executive officer compensation packages. To the extent that stock options are used, the exercise price of such options is the closing price of our stock on the date of board of directors or compensation committee approval.
For the year ended January 31, 2015, annual equity awards for our named executive officers were divided evenly between time-vested RSU awards and performance-vested RSU awards, which we believe provides for a good alignment of executive officer incentives with company performance and a fair balance in the extent to which executive officer compensation is “at risk” both by being tied to the value of Verint's shares and to the performance of our business.
|
•
|
Time-based RSU awards vest in equal portions over a three-year period.
|
|
•
|
The annual performance-based RSU awards for executive officers granted during the year ended January 31, 2015 (in April 2014) vest based on a single 2-year performance period ending on January 31, 2016, based one-third on revenue, one-third on EBITDA, and one-third on relative TSR. Relative TSR is calculated as Verint’s total stockholder return, on a percentile basis, relative to the companies comprising the S&P 1500 Information Technology Sector Index with respect to the applicable performance period, weighted equally and based on the applicable 90-day volume-weighted trailing average closing prices of the stock of such constituent companies as of the beginning and end of the performance period (adjusted for dividends), provided that only those members of the index that constitute part of the index at both the beginning and the end of the performance period will be taken into account for purposes of the calculation. The compensation committee elected to include relative TSR in the new performance equity design in order to increase the alignment of our long-term incentive program with the interests of our stockholders. In structuring the relative TSR calculation and selecting the index, the compensation committee’s goal was to be able to compare Verint’s stock price performance to that of a large, steady-state sampling of technology companies with a
|
37
median size within a range of ours, on a basis designed to eliminate any short-term aberrations in stock price (for either Verint or companies in the index) at the start or the end of the performance period.
|
•
|
Our historical annual performance-based RSU awards, some of which remain outstanding, vest in three tranches corresponding to three separate performance periods, each concluding at the end of a fiscal year, with the performance goal for each such performance period set following the beginning of the applicable performance period. While we believe that waiting until the beginning of the applicable performance period to set the performance goal for that period provides certain advantages, such as greater precision in tailoring the incentive effect of these awards, the compensation committee has decided to transition to the new performance-based RSU design (with longer performance periods) to emphasize a longer-term performance perspective. Annual performance-based RSU awards granted in the years ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 vest 50% based on revenue and 50% based on operating income.
|
The revenue and operating income goals for the January 31, 2015 performance period under the historical annual performance-based RSU awards were set using the same methodology and with the same performance-payout scales, as described above under “—Elements of Compensation—Annual Bonus” for the annual bonus goals.
The performance-payout scales for the revenue, EBITDA, and relative TSR goals under the new 2-year performance RSUs granted during the year ended January 31, 2015 are set out in the table below. As with the historical performance RSU awards, if performance falls below the applicable threshold, the executive officer would not receive any vesting for the portion of the award attributable to that goal. For performance falling between established points in the range, the amount earned is calculated on a formulaic basis based on those points.
|
Revenue Achieved in Performance Period
|
Revenue Payout Percentage in Performance Period
|
|
Threshold (82% of Revenue Target)
|
25%
|
|
(90% of Revenue Target)
|
75%
|
|
(95% of Revenue Target)
|
90%
|
|
Target (100% of Revenue Target)
|
100%
|
|
(105% of Revenue Target)
|
150%
|
|
(108% of Revenue Target)
|
175%
|
|
Maximum (110% of Revenue Target)
|
200%
|
|
EBITDA Achieved in Performance Period
|
EBITDA Payout Percentage in Performance Period
|
|
Threshold (73% of EBITDA Target)
|
25%
|
|
(80% of EBITDA Target)
|
65%
|
|
(90% of EBITDA Target)
|
85%
|
|
Target (100% of EBITDA Target)
|
100%
|
|
(110% of EBITDA Target)
|
150%
|
|
(115% of EBITDA Target)
|
175%
|
|
Maximum (120% of EBITDA Target)
|
200%
|
|
Relative TSR Achieved in Performance Period
|
Relative TSR Payout Percentage in Performance Period
|
|
Threshold (25th or < percentile Relative TSR)
|
0%
|
|
Target (50th percentile Relative TSR)
|
100%
|
|
Maximum (75th or > percentile Relative TSR)
|
200%
|
38
Calculation of Performance Equity Vesting for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
As a result of the transition to a single 2-year performance period for the performance RSUs granted in April 2014, no vesting of these awards occurred during (or in respect of) the year ended January 31, 2015.
The following table summarizes the performance versus payout matrices established by the compensation committee for the performance period ended January 31, 2015 for our historical performance RSUs, as well as the actual goal achievement and calculated vesting levels for these awards in respect of such period. The actual vesting levels were equal to the calculated vesting levels without adjustment by the compensation committee.
|
Performance vs. Payout Matrix (for third tranche of awards approved April 26, 2012)
|
||||||
|
Revenue Goal Opportunity
|
Payout For This Goal
|
|||||
|
Percentage of Revenue Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period
|
Percentage of Revenue Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period
|
|||
|
87%
|
25%
|
104.3%
|
133.4%
|
|||
|
92%
|
75%
|
|||||
|
97%
|
90%
|
|||||
|
100%
|
100%
|
|||||
|
103%
|
120%
|
|||||
|
105%
|
140%
|
|||||
|
108% or more
|
150%
|
|||||
|
Operating Income Goal Opportunity
|
Payout For This Goal
|
|||||
|
Percentage of Operating Income Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period
|
Percentage of Operating Income Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period
|
|||
|
78%
|
25%
|
101.1%
|
104.5%
|
|||
|
83%
|
65%
|
|||||
|
93%
|
85%
|
|||||
|
100%
|
100%
|
|||||
|
105%
|
120%
|
|||||
|
110%
|
140%
|
|||||
|
115% or more
|
150%
|
|||||
|
Overall Payout (Average of Payouts For Each Goal)
|
||||||
|
Percentage of Combined Goals Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period Overall
|
|||||
|
102.7%
|
118.9%
|
|||||
39
|
Performance vs. Payout Matrix (for second tranche of awards approved April 19, 2013)
|
||||||
|
Revenue Goal Opportunity
|
Payout For This Goal
|
|||||
|
Percentage of Revenue Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period
|
Percentage of Revenue Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period
|
|||
|
87%
|
25%
|
104.3%
|
133.4%
|
|||
|
92%
|
75%
|
|||||
|
97%
|
90%
|
|||||
|
100%
|
100%
|
|||||
|
103%
|
120%
|
|||||
|
105%
|
140%
|
|||||
|
108% or more
|
150%
|
|||||
|
Operating Income Goal Opportunity
|
Payout For This Goal
|
|||||
|
Percentage of Operating Income Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Eligible to be Earned for Period
|
Percentage of Operating Income Goal Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period
|
|||
|
78%
|
25%
|
101.1%
|
104.5%
|
|||
|
83%
|
65%
|
|||||
|
93%
|
85%
|
|||||
|
100%
|
100%
|
|||||
|
105%
|
120%
|
|||||
|
110%
|
140%
|
|||||
|
115% or more
|
150%
|
|||||
|
Overall Payout (Average of Payouts For Each Goal)
|
||||||
|
Percentage of Combined Goals Achieved
|
Percentage of Performance Shares Earned for Period Overall
|
|||||
|
102.7%
|
118.9%
|
|||||
40
2013 Special Grant
On April 19, 2013, the compensation committee, with the approval of the board of directors, made a special grant of equity to our named executive officers and certain other executives (the “2013 Special Grant”) in conjunction with our regular annual equity grant for the year ended January 31, 2014.
The 2013 Special Grant was comprised of a time-based component (one-third of the award) and a performance-based component (two-thirds of the award). The time-based RSU component of the grant vested one-third on April 4, 2014, one-third on April 4, 2015, and will vest one-third on April 4, 2016. The performance-based RSU component of the grant was divided into two equal groups of units, "Revenue Units" and "EBITDA Units," each with its own performance vesting conditions that may be satisfied anytime within a five year period from the end of the month in which the grant was made, but subject to a two-quarter sustainability test which may be achieved any time within a six year period from the end of the month in which the grant was made.
In connection with the finalization of our financial results for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2014, the compensation committee determined that the performance vesting conditions for the first half of the EBITDA Units had been satisfied and certified the vesting of such units. In connection with the finalization of our financial results for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2015, the compensation committee determined that the performance vesting conditions for the first half of the Revenue Units had been satisfied and certified the vesting of such units. The specific number of shares earned by each named executive officer as a result of such vesting is summarized in the table below. The second half of each of the EBITDA Units and the Revenue Units remain outstanding.
|
Named Executive Officer
|
First Vesting
|
Second Vesting
|
|
Dan Bodner
|
12,500
|
12,500
|
|
Doug Robinson
|
3,000
|
3,000
|
|
Elan Moriah
|
4,500
|
4,500
|
|
Meir Sperling
|
3,000
|
3,000
|
|
Peter Fante
|
3,000
|
3,000
|
Stock Bonus Program
In order to foster a greater sense of company ownership for employees while reducing the company's cash compensation cost, in September 2011, our board of directors approved a stock bonus program under which eligible employees may receive a portion of their bonuses, otherwise payable in cash, in the form of discounted shares of our common stock. This program is subject to annual funding approval by our board of directors and an annual cap on the number of shares that can be issued. Named executive officers are permitted to participate in the program, to the extent that shares remain available for awards following the enrollment of all other participants, to encourage our officers to continue to increase their stake in the company as well. Shares issued to named executive officers in respect of the discount feature of the program are subject to a one year vesting period to enhance the retentive value of the program and to increase alignment with our stockholders.
For the program period ended January 31, 2014, the board of directors approved the issuance of up to 150,000 shares of common stock and a discount of 15% for awards under the program. Shares in respect of this program period were issued in the quarter ended July 31, 2014, including the following shares issued to the named executive officers (subject to a one year vesting period ending on June 11, 2015) in respect of the 15% discount. These shares are included in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table in the row for the year ended January 31, 2015 (the year in which the shares in respect of the discount feature were awarded). Mr. Sperling did not participate in the program.
|
Named Executive Officer
|
Shares
|
|
Dan Bodner
|
1,992
|
|
Doug Robinson
|
233
|
|
Elan Moriah
|
692
|
|
Peter Fante
|
539
|
For the program period ended January 31, 2015, the board of directors has approved the issuance of up to 125,000 shares of common stock and a discount of 15% for awards under the program. Shares will be issued in respect of this program period in
41
the quarter ending July 31, 2015 (during the year ending January 31, 2016) and the number of shares to be issued to the named executive officers in respect of the discount will not be determinable until such time.
For the program period ending January 31, 2016, the board of directors has approved the issuance of up to 125,000 shares of common stock and a discount of 15% for awards under the program. Shares will be issued in respect of this program period in the quarter ending July 31, 2016 (during the year ending January 31, 2017) and the number of shares to be issued to the named executive officers in respect of the discount will not be determinable until such time.
Other Pay Elements
We do not currently make use of cash-based long-term incentive compensation arrangements, defined benefit plans, or deferred compensation plans. We provide a limited amount of perquisites to our executive officers, which vary from officer to officer and region to region and include:
|
•
|
use of a company car or an annual car allowance, plus fuel reimbursement allowance;
|
|
•
|
an annual allowance for professional legal, tax, or financial advice;
|
|
•
|
payments for accrued vacation days (prior to separation from service); and
|
|
•
|
supplemental company-paid life insurance.
|
Named executive officers in the United States also receive the same partial match of their 401(k) contributions as all other U.S. employees. Named executive officers in Israel receive company contributions to a retirement fund, a severance fund, and a continuing education fund, in each case, on the same basis as other Israeli employees. Named executive officers receive the same health insurance and company-paid group life and disability insurance offered to all other employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed.
Employment Agreements
Each of our named executive officers is party to a formal employment agreement with us. The terms of these agreements are summarized under “Executive Officer Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions—Provisions of Executive Officer Agreements” below.
Clawback Policy
Each of our named executive officers is subject to a clawback provision in his employment agreement that allows us to recoup from the officer, or cancel, all or a portion of the officer's incentive compensation (including bonuses and equity awards) for a particular year if we are required to restate our financial statements for that year due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the U.S. securities laws as a result of the officer's misconduct. The clawback applies from and after the year in which the employment agreement was first signed to performance-based awards made during the term of the agreement which were paid based on the results required to be restated. The amount to be recovered or forfeited is the amount by which the incentive compensation for the year in question exceeded the amount that would have been awarded had the financial statements originally been filed as restated. Our proposed 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan also allows for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award, or the repayment of any gain related to an award, if an officer engages in activity detrimental to our company.
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Other Policies
Our board of directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and non-employee directors who are compensated by us for their services. We believe these guidelines help to further align the interests of our executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders. The guidelines contain customary terms and conditions and establish the following target ownership levels:
|
•
|
ownership equal to five times salary for our Chief Executive Officer;
|
|
•
|
ownership equal to three times salary for our other executive officers (reduced to one and a half times salary beginning at age 62); and
|
|
•
|
ownership equal to three times annual cash retainer for non-employee directors.
|
Until the target ownership levels are met, executive officers and directors subject to the guidelines are required to hold 50% of the after-tax shares acquired from either the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units or from the exercise of stock options. As a result of this requirement, there is no specified time frame for reaching the target ownership levels and no minimum holding periods once shares have been acquired (if an executive officer or director falls below the target ownership
42
level after having achieved it, he or she would again become subject to the 50% after-tax holding requirement until the ownership level had been re-established). Other than pledged shares (as noted below), executive officers and directors subject to the guidelines are permitted to count towards the target ownership levels all shares of common stock held by such individual, regardless of source, including both vested and unvested stock awards, as well as the intrinsic value of vested stock options.
Our insider trading policy prohibits all personnel (including executive officers and directors) from short selling in our securities, from short-term trades in our securities (open market purchase and sale within three months), and from trading options in our securities. It also requires that any hedging transactions (for employees other than executive officers or directors, who are subject to prohibitions under a separate policy described below) be pre-cleared by our legal department.
We have also adopted a policy prohibiting our executive officers and directors from engaging in hedging or significant pledging transactions in our securities. This policy supplements our insider trading policy and our director and executive officer stock ownership guidelines. A pledge is considered significant if it involves a number of shares equal to or exceeding the lesser of 1/2% of our outstanding equity securities or 10% of the Verint equity securities owned by the executive officer or director. Any equity securities that are pledged by an executive officer or director are not eligible to be counted toward such person's satisfaction of our stock ownership guidelines.
Our board of directors has adopted a policy generally precluding us from entering into any new plan, program, agreement, or arrangement providing for a 280G tax gross-up payment with any person or, subject to a limited exception relating to relocations, any other tax gross-up payments with executive officers.
Tax Implications
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to publicly traded companies for compensation paid to certain executives above $1 million in any fiscal year unless such compensation satisfies the Internal Revenue Code's requirements for qualified performance-based compensation. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the compensation committee has not adopted a policy that all compensation must be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Compensation Committee Report
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement with management. Based on its review and discussions with management regarding such section of this proxy statement, the compensation committee recommended to the board of directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section be included in this proxy statement.
|
Compensation Committee:
|
|
|
Richard Nottenburg, Chair
|
|
|
John Egan
|
|
|
Howard Safir
|
|
|
Earl Shanks
|
|
The foregoing report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
43
Compensation Programs and Risk Assessment
In connection with our annual budgeting process and our annual performance review process, our executive management reviews our compensation policies and practices, including with respect to risk. Our compensation policies and practices are relatively stable and tend not to change significantly from year to year, particularly below the executive level. We monitor the operation of these policies and procedures and believe that they have proven to be well-calibrated over time. We also believe that these policies and practices are comparable to those used by similarly situated companies in our industry and the companies with which we compete for talent. In conducting its risk review, management noted in particular the following aspects of our compensation policies and procedures:
|
•
|
We use a combination of elements to achieve a balance between (1) fixed pay and variable pay, (2) time-based components and performance-based components, (3) quantitative targets and qualitative targets, and (4) short-term and long-term elements.
|
|
•
|
Multiple quantitative targets (designed to support the budget approved by the board of directors) within each compensation plan, as well as elements that differ from plan to plan, and discretionary authority/elements or individual/team objectives in some plans.
|
|
•
|
Variable compensation elements represent less than 25% of our total annual compensation expense and are broadly distributed among the employee base.
|
|
•
|
Bonus plans and performance-based equity plans are subject to maximum payouts and contain calibrated performance-payout curves and staged goals below target to permit payout opportunities for performance that approaches, but does not achieve, target.
|
|
•
|
The 2013 Special Grant contains a steady-state test to ensure that performance is sustained before vesting occurs.
|
|
•
|
Management maintains control over award templates and equity plan design and models the financial impact of design elements such as sales quotas and commissions before adoption.
|
|
•
|
Checks and balances in place for the processing of transactions and the calculation of performance levels and payout amounts, including a well-developed system of internal controls to help ensure that financial results and the underlying transactions are sound.
|
|
•
|
Provisions in our commission plans allowing us to reduce, withhold, or offset commissions for transactions that do not meet specified minimum requirements, even after the commission has been paid.
|
|
•
|
Quarter-end guidelines are in place to help ensure that sales transactions are handled in a consistent and ethical manner at the end of each reporting period.
|
|
•
|
Quarterly certifications from a broad base of employees helps promote accountability and compliance.
|
|
•
|
Stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers, as well as a policy prohibiting hedging and restricting pledging to help maintain alignment between our directors / executive officers and our stockholders.
|
|
•
|
Clawback provisions are included in our executive employment agreements and equity award agreements allowing us to recoup payments or awards under appropriate circumstances. Our proposed 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan also allows for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award, or the repayment of any gain related to an award, if a participant engages in activity detrimental to our company.
|
Based on this review, we believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.
44
Executive Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
The following table lists the annual compensation of our named executive officers for the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013.
|
Name and Principal Position
|
Year Ended January 31,
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)(1)
|
Stock Awards
($)(2)
|
Option Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(3)
|
All Other Compensation
($)(4)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Dan Bodner - President and Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Officer
|
2015
|
722,825
|
|
—
|
|
8,049,928
|
|
—
|
|
816,000
|
|
57,019
|
|
9,645,772
|
|
||||||||
|
2014
|
702,975
|
|
—
|
|
7,128,611
|
|
—
|
|
865,327
|
|
62,973
|
|
8,759,886
|
|
|||||||||
|
2013
|
685,000
|
|
—
|
|
3,941,673
|
|
—
|
|
709,279
|
|
78,888
|
|
5,414,840
|
|
|||||||||
|
Douglas Robinson - Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Officer
|
2015
|
406,000
|
|
—
|
|
1,593,531
|
|
—
|
|
289,000
|
|
27,146
|
|
2,315,677
|
|
||||||||
|
2014
|
394,575
|
|
—
|
|
1,565,450
|
|
—
|
|
304,158
|
|
27,054
|
|
2,291,237
|
|
|||||||||
|
2013
|
384,475
|
|
—
|
|
938,967
|
|
—
|
|
250,915
|
|
38,207
|
|
1,612,564
|
|
|||||||||
|
Elan Moriah - President, Enterprise Intelligence Solutions and Video and Situation Intelligence Solutions and Corporate Officer
|
2015
|
406,000
|
|
—
|
|
1,857,143
|
|
—
|
|
289,000
|
|
14,773
|
|
2,566,916
|
|
||||||||
|
2014
|
394,575
|
|
—
|
|
1,987,396
|
|
—
|
|
300,690
|
|
15,805
|
|
2,698,466
|
|
|||||||||
|
2013
|
384,475
|
|
—
|
|
942,641
|
|
—
|
|
245,835
|
|
91,761
|
|
1,664,712
|
|
|||||||||
|
Meir Sperling - Chief Strategy Officer and Corporate Officer (and former President, Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions)
|
2015
|
394,011
|
|
(5)
|
—
|
|
1,172,300
|
|
—
|
|
214,577
|
|
(5)
|
101,640
|
|
1,882,528
|
|
||||||
|
2014
|
384,597
|
|
—
|
|
1,501,610
|
|
—
|
|
251,909
|
|
102,260
|
|
2,240,376
|
|
|||||||||
|
2013
|
349,586
|
|
—
|
|
876,182
|
|
—
|
|
261,430
|
|
91,607
|
|
1,578,805
|
|
|||||||||
|
Peter Fante - Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Officer
|
2015
|
372,300
|
|
—
|
|
1,394,525
|
|
—
|
|
221,000
|
|
38,335
|
|
2,026,160
|
|
||||||||
|
2014
|
361,988
|
|
—
|
|
1,416,775
|
|
—
|
|
234,359
|
|
27,132
|
|
2,040,254
|
|
|||||||||
|
2013
|
352,763
|
|
—
|
|
772,107
|
|
—
|
|
233,160
|
|
21,888
|
|
1,379,918
|
|
|||||||||
(1) Includes cash bonuses awarded outside the officer's regular annual bonus plan, if any.
(2) Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of stock or option awards, as applicable, approved for the named executive officer in the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Includes the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted to the named executive officers in a given fiscal year as a result of the discount feature under the stock bonus program, but excludes the value of any other shares issued or to be issued to the named executive officers under the stock bonus program (the value of which is included within the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the fiscal year in which the corresponding cash bonus was earned). For a further discussion of our accounting for equity compensation, see Note 14, “Stock-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015. For performance-based awards, the value shown in the table for the year ended January 31, 2015 is based on the assumed achievement of the target level (or probable level) of performance. See the “Grant Date Value of Performance Awards” table below for the aggregate grant date fair value of these performance awards assuming the highest level of performance is achieved. Volatility in our stock price from year to year may impact the grant date fair value of our annual equity awards.
(3) Amount represents performance-based annual cash bonuses tied to the officer's pre-defined annual bonus plan. Includes the aggregate grant date fair value of shares to be issued to the named executive officers under the stock bonus program in respect of the fiscal year in which the cash bonus was earned (such shares are effectively purchased by the executive officers at fair market value using bonus dollars), but excluding shares issued as a result of the discount feature of the program (the value of which is included within the “Stock Awards” column in the fiscal year in which such shares were granted). The amounts for
45
Mr. Sperling reflect the impact of applicable exchange rates on the applicable payment dates or dates of board approval. See also footnote 5 to this table below.
(4) See the table below for additional information on “All Other Compensation” amounts for the year ended January 31, 2015. “All Other Compensation” does not include premiums for group life, health, or disability insurance that is available generally to all salaried employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed and do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers or directors.
(5) For the year ended January 31, 2015, Mr. Sperling received a salary of NIS
1,420,233
(
$394,011
based on an average exchange rate from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015 of NIS 1=
$0.2774
) and was awarded a performance-based bonus of NIS
842,000
(
$214,577
based on a January 31, 2015 exchange rate of NIS 1=$
0.2548
), which will be paid during the year ended January 31, 2016.
Grant Date Value of Performance Awards
The following table sets forth the aggregate grant date fair value of the performance awards made to our named executive officers during the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, assuming:
(a) the highest level of performance is achieved (see the Maximum Possible Shares column), or
(b) the target level of performance (probable outcome) is achieved (see the Target Shares column).
Fair value, in the case of the Maximum Possible Shares, is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the accounting grant date. Fair Value, in the case of the Target Shares, is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the dates the compensation committee originally approved the grants (April 26, 2012 ($30.60), April 19, 2013 ($32.77), and April 17, 2014 ($45.29)). The accounting grant date is generally the date on which the performance goal for the applicable award tranche has been both established and communicated, which date is not always the same as the date the compensation committee originally approved the grant. Award tranches are grouped by accounting grant date below.
|
Name
|
Original Date of Committee
Approval of Grant
|
Accounting Grant Date
|
Maximum
Possible Shares
|
Fair Value on Accounting Grant Date
|
Target
Shares
|
Fair Value on Original Date of Committee Approval of Grant
|
||||||||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
127,308
|
|
$
|
5,765,779
|
|
63,654
|
|
$
|
2,882,890
|
|
||||||
|
4/19/2013 (2nd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
36,816
|
|
1,735,138
|
|
24,544
|
|
804,307
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (3rd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
32,782
|
|
1,545,016
|
|
21,855
|
|
668,763
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2015
|
196,906
|
|
$
|
9,045,933
|
|
110,053
|
|
$
|
4,355,960
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013 (1st tranche)
|
4/19/2013
|
31,930
|
|
$
|
1,046,346
|
|
25,544
|
|
$
|
837,077
|
|
|||||||
|
4/19/2013 (Special Equity all tranches)
|
4/19/2013
|
50,000
|
|
1,638,500
|
|
50,000
|
|
1,638,500
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
27,318
|
|
973,887
|
|
21,855
|
|
668,763
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
22,500
|
|
802,125
|
|
18,000
|
|
630,720
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014
|
131,748
|
|
$
|
4,460,858
|
|
115,399
|
|
$3,775,060
|
||||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (1st tranche)
|
4/26/2012
|
43,710
|
|
$
|
1,337,526
|
|
21,855
|
|
$
|
668,763
|
|
|||||||
|
4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
36,000
|
|
1,058,040
|
|
18,000
|
|
630,720
|
|
|||||||||
|
3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
50,194
|
|
1,475,202
|
|
25,097
|
|
616,884
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013
|
129,904
|
|
$
|
3,870,768
|
|
64,952
|
|
$1,916,367
|
||||||||||
46
|
Douglas Robinson
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
24,400
|
|
$
|
1,105,076
|
|
12,200
|
|
$
|
552,538
|
|
||||||
|
4/19/2013 (2nd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
7,363
|
|
347,018
|
|
4,909
|
|
160,868
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (3rd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
7,975
|
|
375,862
|
|
5,317
|
|
162,700
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2015
|
39,738
|
|
$
|
1,827,956
|
|
22,426
|
|
$
|
876,106
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013 (1st tranche)
|
4/19/2013
|
6,136
|
|
$
|
201,077
|
|
4,909
|
|
$
|
160,868
|
|
|||||||
|
4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)
|
4/19/2013
|
12,000
|
|
393,240
|
|
12,000
|
|
393,240
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
6,646
|
|
236,930
|
|
5,317
|
|
162,700
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
5,000
|
|
178,250
|
|
4,000
|
|
140,160
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014
|
29,782
|
|
$
|
1,009,497
|
|
26,226
|
|
$
|
856,968
|
|
||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (1st tranche)
|
4/26/2012
|
10,632
|
|
$
|
325,339
|
|
5,316
|
|
$
|
162,670
|
|
|||||||
|
4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
8,000
|
|
235,120
|
|
4,000
|
|
140,160
|
|
|||||||||
|
3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
11,614
|
|
341,335
|
|
5,807
|
|
142,736
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013
|
30,246
|
|
$
|
901,794
|
|
15,123
|
|
$
|
445,566
|
|
||||||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
28,644
|
|
$
|
1,297,287
|
|
14,322
|
|
$
|
648,643
|
|
||||||
|
4/19/2013 (2nd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
8,766
|
|
413,142
|
|
5,844
|
|
191,508
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (3rd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
7,975
|
|
375,862
|
|
5,317
|
|
162,700
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2015
|
45,385
|
|
$
|
2,086,291
|
|
25,483
|
|
$1,002,851
|
||||||||||
|
4/19/2013 (1st tranche)
|
4/19/2013
|
7,305
|
|
$
|
239,385
|
|
5,844
|
|
$
|
191,508
|
|
|||||||
|
4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)
|
4/19/2013
|
18,000
|
|
589,860
|
|
18,000
|
|
589,860
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
6,646
|
|
236,930
|
|
5,317
|
|
162,700
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
5,156
|
|
183,811
|
|
4,125
|
|
144,540
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014
|
37,107
|
|
$
|
1,249,986
|
|
33,286
|
|
$
|
1,088,608
|
|
||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (1st tranche)
|
4/26/2012
|
10,632
|
|
$
|
325,339
|
|
5,316
|
|
$
|
162,670
|
|
|||||||
|
4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
8,250
|
|
242,468
|
|
4,125
|
|
144,540
|
|
|||||||||
|
3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
11,614
|
|
341,335
|
|
5,807
|
|
142,736
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013
|
30,496
|
|
$
|
909,142
|
|
15,248
|
|
$
|
449,946
|
|
||||||||
|
Meir Sperling
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
15,912
|
|
$
|
720,654
|
|
7,956
|
|
$
|
360,327
|
|
||||||
|
4/19/2013 (2nd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
6,837
|
|
322,228
|
|
4,558
|
|
149,366
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (3rd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
7,536
|
|
355,172
|
|
5,024
|
|
153,734
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2015
|
30,285
|
|
$
|
1,398,054
|
|
17,538
|
|
$
|
663,427
|
|
||||||||
47
|
4/19/2013 (1st tranche)
|
4/19/2013
|
5,697
|
|
$
|
186,691
|
|
4,558
|
|
$
|
149,366
|
|
|||||||
|
4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)
|
4/19/2013
|
12,000
|
|
393,240
|
|
12,000
|
|
393,240
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
6,278
|
|
223,811
|
|
5,023
|
|
153,704
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
4,740
|
|
168,981
|
|
3,792
|
|
132,872
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014
|
28,715
|
|
$
|
972,723
|
|
25,373
|
|
$
|
829,182
|
|
||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (1st tranche)
|
4/26/2012
|
10,046
|
|
$
|
307,408
|
|
5,023
|
|
$
|
153,704
|
|
|||||||
|
4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
7,584
|
|
222,894
|
|
3,792
|
|
132,872
|
|
|||||||||
|
3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
10,200
|
|
299,778
|
|
5,100
|
|
125,358
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013
|
27,830
|
|
$
|
830,080
|
|
13,915
|
|
$
|
411,934
|
|
||||||||
|
Peter Fante
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
21,216
|
|
$
|
960,873
|
|
10,608
|
|
$
|
480,436
|
|
||||||
|
4/19/2013 (2nd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
6,310
|
|
297,390
|
|
4,207
|
|
137,863
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (3rd tranche)
|
3/20/2014
|
6,651
|
|
313,462
|
|
4,434
|
|
135,680
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2015
|
34,177
|
|
$
|
1,571,725
|
|
19,249
|
|
$
|
753,979
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013 (1st tranche)
|
4/19/2013
|
5,258
|
|
$
|
172,305
|
|
4,207
|
|
$
|
137,863
|
|
|||||||
|
4/19/2013 (Special Equity All Tranches)
|
4/19/2013
|
12,000
|
|
393,240
|
|
12,000
|
|
393,240
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (2nd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
5,541
|
|
197,537
|
|
4,433
|
|
135,650
|
|
|||||||||
|
4/12/2011 (3rd tranche)
|
3/14/2013
|
4,115
|
|
146,700
|
|
3,292
|
|
115,352
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2014
|
26,914
|
|
$
|
909,782
|
|
23,932
|
|
$
|
782,105
|
|
||||||||
|
4/26/2012 (1st tranche)
|
4/26/2012
|
8,866
|
|
$
|
271,300
|
|
4,433
|
|
$
|
135,650
|
|
|||||||
|
4/12/2011 (2nd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
6,584
|
|
193,504
|
|
3,292
|
|
115,352
|
|
|||||||||
|
3/17/2010 (3rd tranche)
|
3/22/2012
|
9,032
|
|
265,450
|
|
4,516
|
|
111,003
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total Grants for Year Ended 1/31/2013
|
24,482
|
|
$
|
730,254
|
|
12,241
|
|
$
|
362,005
|
|
||||||||
48
All Other Compensation Table
|
Name
|
Employer Retirement Contrib.
($)
|
Severance Fund Contrib.
($)
|
Study Fund Contrib.
($)
|
Car Allowance or Cost of Company Car Plus Fuel Allowance
($)
|
Professional Advice Allowance
($)
|
Accrued Vacation Payout
($) (2)
|
Statutory Recreation Payment
($)
|
Supp. Life Insurance
($)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
2,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,780
|
|
20,000
|
|
13,999
|
|
—
|
|
8,240
|
|
57,019
|
|
|||||||||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
2,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,000
|
|
10,000
|
|
3,146
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
27,146
|
|
|||||||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
2,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,773
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
14,773
|
|
||||||||||
|
Meir Sperling (1)
|
22,160
|
|
32,813
|
|
29,551
|
|
16,277
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
839
|
|
—
|
|
101,640
|
|
|||||||||
|
Peter Fante
|
2,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,000
|
|
1,800
|
|
22,535
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
38,335
|
|
|||||||||
(1) For the year ended January 31, 2015, Mr. Sperling received a company contribution to his retirement fund of NIS
79,878
(
$22,160
), to his severance fund of NIS
118,275
(
$32,813
), to his study fund of NIS
106,518
(
$29,551
), use of a company car plus a fuel reimbursement allowance which cost us NIS
58,671
(
$16,277
) for the period, and a statutory recreation payment of NIS
3,024
(
$839
). For purposes of this table, all amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars based on an average exchange rate from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015 of NIS 1=
$0.2774
.
(2) During the year ended January 31, 2015, each of Messrs. Bodner, Robinson and Fante elected to participate in a program available to all U.S. employees by which a portion of the employee's accrued vacation is monetized and the after-tax amount is donated to a children's charity as part of Verint's community relations program. The table above reflects the pre-tax amount that was included in the officer's compensation prior to such donation.
49
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
The following table sets forth information concerning equity and other plan-based grants to our named executive officers during the year ended January 31, 2015. The table also contains information for awards originally approved in prior years to the extent that one or more of the performance goals for the applicable tranche of such awards was established in the year ended January 31, 2015 (meaning that the accounting grant date for such tranche was in the year ended January 31, 2015).
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Type of Award
|
Original Date of Committee Approval of Grant
|
Accounting Grant Date
|
Threshold
($) (1) |
Target
($)
|
Max
($) |
Threshold
(#) (11) |
Target
(#) |
Max
(#) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
(#) |
Accounting Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
($) (2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
63,653
|
|
2,882,844
|
|
|||||||||||
|
RSU (Stock Bonus Program discount shares) (4)
|
6/11/2014
|
6/11/2014
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,992
|
|
97,409
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
(9)
|
10,609
|
|
63,654
|
|
127,308
|
|
2,882,890
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
6,136
|
|
24,544
|
|
36,816
|
|
1,156,759
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
5,463
|
|
21,855
|
|
32,782
|
|
1,030,026
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/15
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
163,200
|
|
816,000
|
|
1,142,400
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,200
|
|
552,538
|
|
|||||||||||
|
RSU (Stock Bonus Program discount shares) (4)
|
6/11/2014
|
6/11/2014
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
233
|
|
11,394
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
(9)
|
2,033
|
|
12,200
|
|
24,400
|
|
552,538
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1,227
|
|
4,909
|
|
7,363
|
|
231,361
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1,329
|
|
5,317
|
|
7,975
|
|
250,590
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/15
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
57,800
|
|
289,000
|
|
404,600
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
14,322
|
|
648,643
|
|
|||||||||||
|
RSU (Stock Bonus Program discount shares) (4)
|
6/11/2014
|
6/11/2014
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
692
|
|
33,839
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
(9)
|
2,387
|
|
14,322
|
|
28,644
|
|
648,643
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1,461
|
|
5,844
|
|
8,766
|
|
275,428
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1,329
|
|
5,317
|
|
7,975
|
|
250,590
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/15
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
57,800
|
|
289,000
|
|
404,600
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Meir Sperling
|
RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,957
|
|
360,373
|
|
|||||||||||
|
RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
(9)
|
1,326
|
|
7,956
|
|
15,912
|
|
—
|
|
360,327
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1,139
|
|
4,558
|
|
6,837
|
|
214,819
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1,256
|
|
5,024
|
|
7,536
|
|
236,781
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/15 (8)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
42,915
|
|
214,577
|
|
300,408
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Peter Fante
|
RSU (Time-vested grants) (3)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,609
|
|
480,482
|
|
|||||||||||
|
RSU (Stock Bonus Program discount shares) (4)
|
6/11/2014
|
6/11/2014
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
539
|
|
26,357
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
RSU (Performance-vested grant) (5) (6) (7)
|
4/17/2014
|
4/17/2014
|
(9)
|
1,768
|
|
10,608
|
|
21,216
|
|
480,436
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1051
|
|
4,207
|
|
6,310
|
|
198,276
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
3/20/2014
|
(10)
|
1,108
|
|
4,434
|
|
6,651
|
|
208,974
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Annual Bonus for Year Ended 1/31/15
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
44,200
|
|
221,000
|
|
309,400
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||||||
50
(1) The threshold column corresponds to the minimum bonus payable to the executive officer assuming that minimum financial performance goals are achieved and assuming that MBO achievement is zero. If minimum financial performance goals are not achieved and MBO achievement is zero, the bonus payable to the executive officer would be zero.
(2) The accounting grant date fair value of equity awards is based on the target number of shares and calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the accounting grant date, which is not always the same as the date the compensation committee originally approved the grant. The accounting grant date is generally the date on which the performance goal for the applicable award tranche has been both established and communicated. For a further discussion of our accounting for equity compensation, see Note 14, “Stock-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015. See the "Grant Date Value of Performance Awards" table above for information about the grant date values of the performance-vested equity awards included in this table calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the dates the compensation committee originally approved the grants.
(3) The April 17, 2014 time-based awards vest 1/3 on April 8, 2015, 1/3 on April 8, 2016, and 1/3 on April 8, 2017.
(4) Shares granted during the year ended January 31, 2015 in respect of the discount feature under the Stock Bonus Program for the program period ended January 31, 2014. These shares are included within our compensation disclosure for the year ended January 31, 2015 because the shares were not granted until midway through the year ended January 31, 2015 and under the terms of the Stock Bonus Program the number of shares to be granted was not determinable until such time. These shares are subject to a one year vesting period ending in June 2015. For more information on the Stock Bonus Program, see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Bonus Program” above.
(5) The April 17, 2014 annual performance awards vest based on a single 2-year performance period following the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue, EBITDA, and relative TSR targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2016, but no earlier than April 8, 2016.
(6) The April 19, 2013 annual performance awards vest 1/3 following the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue and operating income targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 4, 2014, 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 4, 2015, and 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016, but no earlier than April 4, 2016.
(7) The April 26, 2012 annual performance awards vest 1/3 following the compensation committee’s determination of our achievement of specified revenue and operating income targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013, but no earlier than April 10, 2013, 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 10, 2014, and 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 10, 2015.
(8) On March 20, 2014, the compensation committee approved threshold, target, and maximum bonus awards for Mr. Sperling of NIS
168,400
, NIS
842,000
, and NIS
1,178,800
respectively ($
42,915
, $
214,577
, and $
300,408
, based on a January 31, 2015 exchange rate of NIS1=$
0.2548
).
(9) As noted above, the April 17, 2014 annual performance awards vest based on a single 2-year performance period ending on January 31, 2016, for which the performance goals were established at the time of grant.
(10) The April 19, 2013 and April 26, 2012 annual performance awards contain three equal tranches which vest based on three separate performance periods. Dates correspond to the accounting grant date applicable to the first, second, and third tranches, respectively. The accounting grant date is generally the date on which the performance goal for the applicable award tranche has been both established and communicated. The third and final tranche of the April 19, 2013 annual performance award does not have an accounting grant date as the performance goals have not yet been established, but this tranche is subject to a maximum payout level of 200% or less.
(11) Represents the threshold number of shares that were available to be earned in the applicable performance period. If the minimum performance goal is not achieved in any performance period, no shares are earned for that period. The performance goals for the third and final tranche of the April 19, 2013 annual performance award have not yet been established.
51
The following table summarizes the actual number of shares earned with respect to the performance equity awards listed in the table above for each of the performance periods that have already been completed.
|
Performance Grant Approved April 26, 2012
|
|||||||||
|
Name
|
Shares Earned for YE 1/31/13 Performance Period
|
Shares Earned for YE 1/31/14 Performance Period
|
Shares Earned for YE 1/31/15 Performance Period
|
||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
20,274
|
|
24,095
|
|
25,991
|
|
|||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
4,931
|
|
5,862
|
|
6,323
|
|
|||
|
Elan Moriah
|
4,931
|
|
5,862
|
|
6,323
|
|
|||
|
Meir Sperling
|
4,659
|
|
5,538
|
|
5,974
|
|
|||
|
Peter Fante
|
4,112
|
|
4,887
|
|
5,273
|
|
|||
|
Regular Annual Performance Grant Approved April 19, 2013
|
|||||||||
|
Name
|
Shares Earned for YE 1/31/14 Performance Period
|
Shares Earned for YE 1/31/15 Performance Period
|
|||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
27,060
|
|
29,189
|
|
|||||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
5,412
|
|
5,838
|
|
|||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
6,443
|
|
6,950
|
|
|||||
|
Meir Sperling
|
5,025
|
|
5,420
|
|
|||||
|
Peter Fante
|
4,638
|
|
5,003
|
|
|||||
Further Information Regarding Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2015 and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
As of the date of this proxy statement, each of our named executive officers is party to an employment agreement with us. Each agreement provides for certain severance payments and benefits, including in connection with a change in control. See “—Executive Officer Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions” below for a discussion of these severance and change in control benefits, as well as a description of the restrictive covenants and clawback provisions contained in such agreements.
The agreements with our U.S. named executive officers generally provide for an initial term of two years, followed by automatic one-year renewals (unless terminated by either party in accordance with the agreement and subject to required notice). The agreements with our non-U.S. named executive officers do not provide for a fixed term. Termination of the agreements by us constitutes good reason for resignation under the agreements with our U.S. named executive officers other than Mr. Bodner, and constitutes a termination without cause under the agreement with Mr. Bodner.
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, each named executive officer's employment agreement provides for an annual base salary, target bonus, and certain perquisites. Although target bonuses are specified in each employment agreement, bonuses are not guaranteed and are paid based on the achievement of performance goals. As of January 31, 2015, the target bonuses specified by the employment agreements were as follows: $600,000 (for Mr. Bodner), $219,000 (for Mr. Robinson), $167,500 (for Mr. Fante), $219,000 (for Mr. Moriah), and NIS 638,000 (for Mr. Sperling). Other than in the case of Mr. Bodner, whose employment agreement was signed in February 2010, all of the other executive officers entered into new or amended employment agreements in July 2011, which updated their contractual target bonuses to match the target bonuses established for them by the compensation committee in March 2011. As of January 31, 2015, the contractual target bonus for Mr. Sperling corresponded to $162,589 based on an exchange rate of NIS 1=
$0.2548
on such date. Historically, the target bonuses for each executive officer established by the compensation committee as part of its annual compensation review process has equaled or exceeded the target bonus specified in the executive officer’s employment agreement (if any) as well as the target bonus from the previous year.
52
Narrative to All Other Compensation Table
We provide a limited amount of perquisites to our named executive officers, which vary from officer to officer depending on the terms of their employment agreements, local policy, and historical practice. Each of the executive officers is entitled to use of a company car or an annual car allowance. Mr. Sperling is also entitled to an annual allowance for fuel reimbursement. Messrs. Bodner, Robinson, and Fante are entitled to an annual allowance for legal, tax, or accounting advice. In some years, Mr. Sperling has received reimbursement of a limited amount of legal or tax advice as agreed by us on a case by case basis. Beginning in the fiscal year ending January 31, 2016, Mr. Moriah will be entitled to an annual allowance for legal, tax, or accounting advice. All executive officers receive the same health insurance and company-paid group life and disability insurance offered to all other employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed. In addition, Mr. Bodner has historically received a supplemental company-paid life insurance policy. Executive officers in the U.S. receive the same partial match of their 401(k) contributions as all other U.S. employees, up to a maximum company contribution of $2,000 per year.
Like all Israeli employees, under Israeli law, Mr. Sperling is entitled to severance pay equal to one month’s salary for each year of employment upon termination without cause (as defined in the Israel Severance Pay Law). To satisfy this requirement, for all Israeli employees, including Mr. Sperling, we make contributions on behalf of the employee to a severance fund. This severance fund is often part of a larger provident fund which also includes a retirement fund and in some cases an insurance component. Each employee can elect to contribute an amount equal to between 5% and 7% of his or her monthly salary to the retirement fund. We contribute an amount equal to between 5% and 7.5% of the employee’s monthly salary to the retirement fund (or other provident fund) plus an additional amount equal to 8.33% of the employee’s monthly salary to the severance fund. The employee is not required to contribute anything towards the severance fund. Our contributions are incremental to the employee’s base salary and, except as noted below, are paid by us directly to the third-party plan administrator. Applicable tax law permits allocations made by the employer to the retirement fund to be made on a tax-free basis up to a limit set by applicable Israeli tax regulations. Under local Israeli company policy, the employee may request that any company contributions in excess of this limit be made directly to him or her rather than being placed in the retirement fund. For executives like Mr. Sperling, if the amount in the severance fund is insufficient to cover the required statutory payment under Israeli labor law at the time of a termination event, we are obligated to supplement the amounts in the severance fund.
In addition, all Israeli employees, including Mr. Sperling, are also entitled to participate in a continuing education fund, often referred to as a study fund. The continuing education fund is a savings fund from which the employee can withdraw on a tax-free basis for any purpose after six years, irrespective of his or her employment status with us. Each month, eligible employees contribute 2.5%, and we contribute 7.5%, of the employee’s base salary to the study fund. Applicable tax law permits a portion of the company contributions to the study fund to be made tax-free. Under local Israeli company policy, the employee may request that any company contributions in excess of this limit be made directly to him or her rather than being placed in the fund. Our contributions are incremental to the employee’s base salary and, except as noted above, are paid by us directly to the third-party plan administrator. Under applicable Israeli law, each employee who has completed at least one year of service is paid a small annual amount for recreation based on the employee’s tenure and a per-diem rate published by the Israeli government. Under local Israeli company policy, our Israeli employees are also entitled to receive a cash payment in exchange for vacation days in accordance with the terms of the policy.
Outstanding Equity Awards at January 31, 2015
The following table sets forth information regarding various equity awards held by our named executive officers as of January 31, 2015. The market value of all awards is based on the closing price of our common stock as of the last trading day in the year ended January 31, 2015 ($53.38 on January 30, 2015).
53
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
|
Date of Committee Approval of Grant
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#) Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price
($) |
Option Expiration Date
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#) (9) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#) (10) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
4/26/2012
|
(1)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
21,855
|
|
1,166,620
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
25,991
|
|
1,387,400
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(3)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
65,756
|
|
3,510,055
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(4)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
37,500
|
|
2,001,750
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(5)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
29,189
|
|
1,558,109
|
|
24,544
|
|
1,310,159
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(6)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
63,653
|
|
3,397,797
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(7)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
63,654
|
|
3,397,851
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
6/11/2014
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,992
|
|
106,333
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
4/26/2012
|
(1)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,317
|
|
283,821
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,323
|
|
337,522
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(3)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
13,818
|
|
737,605
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(4)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,000
|
|
480,420
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(5)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,838
|
|
311,632
|
|
4,909
|
|
262,042
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(6)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,200
|
|
651,236
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(7)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,200
|
|
651,236
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
6/11/2014
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
233
|
|
12,438
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
4/26/2012
|
(1)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,317
|
|
283,821
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,323
|
|
337,522
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(3)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
17,688
|
|
944,185
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(4)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
13,500
|
|
720,630
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(5)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,950
|
|
370,991
|
|
5,844
|
|
311,953
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(6)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
14,322
|
|
764,508
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(7)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
14,322
|
|
764,508
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
6/11/2014
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
692
|
|
36,939
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Meir Sperling
|
4/26/2012
|
(1)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,024
|
|
268,181
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,974
|
|
318,892
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(3)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
13,117
|
|
700,185
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(4)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,000
|
|
480,420
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(5)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,420
|
|
289,320
|
|
4,558
|
|
243,306
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(6)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,957
|
|
424,745
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(7)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,956
|
|
424,691
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
Peter Fante
|
4/26/2012
|
(1)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,434
|
|
236,687
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
4/26/2012
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,273
|
|
281,473
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(3)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
12,416
|
|
662,766
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(4)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
9,000
|
|
480,420
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/19/2013
|
(5)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,003
|
|
267,060
|
|
4,208
|
|
224,623
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(6)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,609
|
|
566,308
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
4/17/2014
|
(7)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,608
|
|
566,255
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
|
6/11/2014
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
539
|
|
28,772
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||||
54
(1) The April 26, 2012 time-based awards vest 1/3 on April 10, 2013, 1/3 on April 10, 2014, and 1/3 on April 10, 2015.
(2) The April 26, 2012 annual performance awards vest 1/3 following the compensation committee’s determination of our achievement of specified revenue and operating income targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013, but no earlier than April 10, 2013, 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 10, 2014, and 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 10, 2015. The table excludes shares eligible to be earned in excess of the target level based on the overachievement of the applicable performance goals except with respect to tranches for which the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2015 (and the number of such overachievement shares could be calculated). For tranches earned in respect of the performance period ended on January 31, 2015, the table shows the number of shares earned in the column entitled “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” because the determination of the number of shares earned (and the vesting thereof) did not occur until after the conclusion of the year ended January 31, 2015. See “—Grant Date Value of Performance Awards” above and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended January 31, 2015” above for more information.
(3) The April 19, 2013 time-based awards vest 1/3 on April 4, 2014, 1/3 on April 4, 2015, and 1/3 on April 4, 2016.
(4) The April 19, 2013 special performance awards vest following the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue and EBITDA targets (set by the compensation committee upon grant) for the period from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2019. The table shows the number of unvested shares in the column entitled “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” because the specified revenue and EBITDA targets were not met as of January 31, 2015. For a full description of the 2013 Special Grant and associated metrics, see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2013 Special Grant” above.
(5) The April 19, 2013 annual performance awards vest 1/3 following the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue and operating income targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014, but no earlier than April 4, 2014, 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015, but no earlier than April 4, 2015, and 1/3 following the determination of such achievement for the period from February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016, but no earlier than April 4, 2016. The table excludes shares eligible to be earned in excess of the target level based on the overachievement of the applicable performance goals except with respect to tranches for which the performance period had been completed as of January 31, 2015 (and the number of such overachievement shares could be calculated). For tranches earned in respect of the quarterly period ended on January 31, 2015, the table shows the number of shares earned in the column entitled “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” because the determination of the number of shares earned (and the vesting thereof) did not occur until after the conclusion of the year ended January 31, 2015. See “—Grant Date Value of Performance Awards” above and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended January 31, 2015” above for more information.
(6) The April 17, 2014 time-based awards vest 1/3 on April 8, 2015, 1/3 on April 8, 2016, and 1/3 on April 8, 2017.
(7) The April 17, 2014 annual performance awards vest based on a single 2-year performance period following the compensation committee's determination of our achievement of specified revenue, EBITDA, and relative TSR targets (set by the compensation committee for the relevant performance period) for the period from February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2016, but no earlier than April 8, 2016. The table excludes shares eligible to be earned in excess of the target level based on the overachievement of the applicable performance goals.
(8) Shares granted during the year ended January 31, 2015 in respect of the discount feature under the Stock Bonus Program for the program period ended January 31, 2014. These shares are included within our compensation disclosure for the year ended January 31, 2015 because the shares were not granted until midway through the year ended January 31, 2015 and under the terms of the Stock Bonus Program the number of shares to be granted was not determinable until such time. These shares are subject to a one year vesting period ending in June 2015. For more information on the Stock Bonus Program, see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Bonus Program” above.
(9) Includes time-based awards and performance-based awards for which the performance goals had been established by the compensation committee as of January 31, 2015.
(10) Includes performance-based awards for which the performance goals had not yet been established by the compensation committee as of January 31, 2015 (i.e., the third and final tranche of the April 19, 2013 annual performance award).
55
Option Exercises and Stock Vesting During the Year Ended January 31, 2015
The following table sets forth information regarding option exercises and stock award vestings for our named executive officers during the year ended January 31, 2015. The value realized on exercise of stock options is calculated by multiplying the number of options being exercised by the spread between the exercise price and the market price of our common stock at the time of exercise. The value of stock awards realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting by the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date. See “—Outstanding Equity Awards at January 31, 2015” above for the vesting schedule of outstanding awards.
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
|||||||||||
|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
Value Realized on Exercise
($)
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
(#)
|
Value Realized on Vesting
($)
|
||||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
168,000
|
|
3,593,348
|
|
155,832
|
|
7,425,926
|
|
||||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
34,820
|
|
1,660,328
|
|
||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
45,000
|
|
598,948
|
|
39,546
|
|
1,898,789
|
|
||||
|
Meir Sperling
|
45,000
|
|
661,523
|
|
33,032
|
|
1,576,991
|
|
||||
|
Peter Fante
|
20,000
|
|
238,267
|
|
30,013
|
|
1,435,714
|
|
||||
Executive Officer Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions
As of the date of this proxy statement, each of our named executive officers is party to an employment agreement with us. The following is a summary of the severance and change in control provisions of these employment agreements as of the date of this proxy statement. The following also summarizes related benefits that our non-U.S. named executive officers may be entitled to under local law. This is not a complete summary of the named executive officer employment agreements.
Provisions of Executive Officer Agreements
Each of the employment agreements with our named executive officers provides for an annual base salary and a performance-based bonus target.
Severance or Advance Notice Not in Connection with a Change in Control
In the event of an involuntary termination of employment (a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason) not in connection with a change in control, the executive officers are, subject to their execution of a release and continued compliance with the restrictive covenants described below, entitled to specified amounts of severance and/or minimum amounts of advance notice.
Our U.S. executive officers, other than Mr. Bodner, are entitled to 12 months of severance consisting of base salary and reimbursement of health insurance premiums.
Mr. Bodner is entitled to a 60 day advance notice period (during which all of his regular compensation and benefits would be payable) and 18 months of severance consisting of base salary, reimbursement of health insurance premiums, continuation of his professional advice allowance, and access to his company-leased vehicle.
Mr. Sperling is entitled to a 90 day advance notice period (during which all of his regular compensation and benefits would be payable), which subsumes the minimum notice period required under Israeli law for all Israeli employees, and 12 months of severance consisting of base salary and reimbursement of health insurance premiums.
As discussed under “—Narrative to ‘All Other Compensation’ Table” above, Mr. Sperling is also entitled to severance pay equal to one month’s salary for each year of employment upon termination without cause (as defined in the Israel Severance Pay Law) under Israeli law applicable to all Israeli employees. We make payments into a severance fund to secure this severance obligation during the course of Mr. Sperling’s employment and, unless there is a shortfall as described under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)” below, we are not responsible for any payments at the time of a qualifying termination. As a result, the amounts we pay into the severance fund each year are included in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table for the Year Ended January 31, 2015” above, but not in the table entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)” below. However, the table entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)” below does include any additional amount of severance we are responsible for in excess of the balance in the severance fund at the time of a qualifying termination (in the event there is a shortfall) based on the legally mandated formula described above.
56
Mr. Sperling is also entitled to a resettlement grant in an amount equal to his base salary plus regular benefits for 10 months, plus 1 month for each full year of service beginning after September 1, 2010 and a pro-rated month for the applicable portion of the final year of service. This resettlement grant as well as the release of Mr. Sperling’s severance fund discussed above (including any true-up required at the time of a qualifying termination) is also payable in the event of Mr. Sperling’s resignation, whether or not for good reason, but not in the event of a termination for cause.
In the event of an involuntary termination, each executive officer, other than Mr. Bodner, is also entitled to a pro-rated portion of his annual bonus for such year plus an amount equal to 100% of his average annual bonus measured over the last three years. Mr. Bodner’s agreement provides for a pro-rated portion of his annual bonus for such year plus an amount equal to 150% of his target bonus.
Severance in Connection with a Change in Control
In the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control, in lieu of the salary severance and bonus severance described above, each of the executive officers is entitled to enhanced cash severance equal to the sum of 1.5 times his base salary and target bonus, plus a pro-rated target bonus for the year of termination, or in the case of Mr. Bodner, 2.5 times the sum of his base salary and target bonus, plus a pro-rated target bonus for the year of termination. As noted above, Mr. Sperling is also entitled to the resettlement grant and release of his severance fund in the event of any termination or resignation other than a termination for cause. Other payments or benefits triggered by a termination event, such as advance notice or reimbursement of health insurance premiums, would continue to apply on the same basis as described in the preceding section.
Equity
Other than in the case of Mr. Bodner, no equity acceleration is provided in the case of an involuntary termination not in connection with a change in control. In the event of an involuntary termination of employment in connection with a change in control, each of the employment agreements provides for acceleration of all unvested equity awards. Each of the agreements also provides that all of the executive officer’s outstanding equity awards will become fully vested if not assumed in connection with a change in control.
Other Provisions
Each of the employment agreements provides for customary restrictive covenants, with a covenant period ranging from 12 to 24 months, including a non-compete, a non-solicitation of customers and employees, and an indefinite non-disclosure provision. Each agreement also contains a clawback provision which allows us to recoup from the officer, or cancel, a portion of the officer’s incentive compensation (including bonuses and equity awards) for a particular year if we are required to restate our financial statements for that year due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the U.S. securities laws as a result of the officer’s misconduct. The clawback applies from and after the year in which the employment agreement was first signed to performance-based awards made during the term of the agreement which were paid based on the results required to be restated. The amount to be recovered or forfeited is the amount by which the incentive compensation in the year in question exceeded the amount that would have been awarded had the financial statements originally been filed as restated. Our proposed 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan also allows for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award, or the repayment of any gain related to an award, if an officer engages in activity detrimental to our company. Each of our U.S. executive officers is also entitled to a gross-up for any excise taxes he may become subject to in connection with a change in control. The terms “cause”, “good reason”, and “change in control” are defined in the forms of employment agreements.
57
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (CIC)
The table below outlines the potential payments and benefits that would have become payable by us to our named executive officers in the event of certain triggering events, assuming that the relevant event occurred on January 31, 2015. In reviewing the table, please note the following:
|
•
|
The table does not include amounts that would be payable by third parties where we have no continuing liability at the time of the triggering event, such as amounts payable under private insurance policies, government insurance such as social security or national insurance, or 401(k) or similar defined contribution retirement plans. As a result, the table does not reflect amounts payable to Mr. Sperling under the applicable local company retirement plan or retirement fund, for which we have no liability at the time of payment.
|
|
•
|
Except as noted in the following bullet, the table does not include payments or benefits that are available generally to all salaried employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed and do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers or directors, such as short-term disability payments or payment for accrued but unused vacation.
|
|
•
|
The table includes all severance or notice payments for which we are financially responsible at the time of the triggering event, even if such payments are available generally to all salaried employees in the country in which the executive officer is employed and do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers or directors.
|
|
•
|
With respect to Mr. Sperling’s severance fund, the table includes the difference between the amount that would have been owed to Mr. Sperling under applicable Israeli labor law in the event of an involuntary termination and the amount in his severance fund at January 31, 2015, since we would be responsible for such shortfall (if any).
|
|
•
|
The value of equity awards in the table below is based on the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day in the year ended January 31, 2015 ($53.38 on January 30, 2015).
|
|
•
|
The table assumes that in connection with a change in control in which the executive officer is not terminated, all of such executive officer’s unvested equity is assumed (and is therefore not accelerated).
|
|
•
|
The table assumes that in the event an executive officer becomes disabled, he becomes eligible for benefits under our long-term disability insurance within six months of the occurrence of such disability.
|
|
•
|
Except with respect to tax gross-up amounts to which the executive officers may be entitled, all amounts are calculated on a pre-tax basis.
|
|
•
|
Mr. Sperling is compensated in his local currency of Israeli shekels. For purposes of this table, all Israeli shekel amounts for Mr. Sperling have been translated into U.S. dollars using a January 31, 2015 exchange rate of NIS 1=
$0.2548
.
|
58
|
Salary Continuation Value
($) |
Pro Rata Bonus
($) (3) |
Additional Bonus
($) (4) |
Accelerated Equity Awards
($) (5) |
Health Benefits (present insurance coverage value)
($) (6) |
Other Benefits
($) (7) |
280G Tax Gross up
($) (8) |
Total ($)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Death
|
—
|
|
816,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
62,907
|
|
49,169
|
|
—
|
|
928,076
|
|
||||||||
|
Disability
|
364,000
|
|
816,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20,969
|
|
49,169
|
|
—
|
|
1,250,138
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause
|
1,092,000
|
|
816,000
|
|
1,224,000
|
|
17,367,343
|
|
62,907
|
|
49,169
|
|
—
|
|
20,611,419
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC
|
1,820,000
|
|
816,000
|
|
2,040,000
|
|
17,367,343
|
|
62,907
|
|
49,169
|
|
—
|
|
22,155,419
|
|
||||||||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Death
|
—
|
|
289,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
330,938
|
|
||||||||
|
Disability
|
204,500
|
|
289,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20,969
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
514,469
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause
|
409,000
|
|
289,000
|
|
281,358
|
|
—
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,021,296
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC
|
613,500
|
|
289,000
|
|
433,500
|
|
3,624,662
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,002,600
|
|
||||||||
|
Elan Moriah
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Death
|
—
|
|
289,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
330,938
|
|
||||||||
|
Disability
|
204,500
|
|
289,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20,969
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
514,469
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause
|
409,000
|
|
289,000
|
|
278,508
|
|
—
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,018,446
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC
|
613,500
|
|
289,000
|
|
433,500
|
|
4,422,319
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,800,257
|
|
||||||||
|
Meir Sperling
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Death
|
410,169
|
|
(1)
|
214,577
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
70
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
624,816
|
|
|||||||
|
Disability
|
592,467
|
|
(1)
|
214,577
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
70
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
807,114
|
|
|||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause
|
865,913
|
|
(2)
|
214,577
|
|
228,098
|
|
—
|
|
87
|
|
25,618
|
|
—
|
|
1,334,293
|
|
|||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC
|
1,048,210
|
|
(2)
|
214,577
|
|
321,865
|
|
3,053,016
|
|
87
|
|
25,618
|
|
—
|
|
4,663,373
|
|
|||||||
|
Peter Fante
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Death
|
—
|
|
221,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
262,938
|
|
||||||||
|
Disability
|
187,500
|
|
221,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20,969
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
429,469
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause
|
375,000
|
|
221,000
|
|
229,506
|
|
—
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
867,444
|
|
||||||||
|
Resignation for Good Reason/Involuntary Termination without Cause in Connection with CIC
|
562,500
|
|
221,000
|
|
331,500
|
|
3,227,088
|
|
41,938
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
4,384,026
|
|
||||||||
(1) For Mr. Sperling, salary continuation for these events includes a resettlement grant of NIS
1,609,504
(
$410,169
), and in the case of disability, 6 months of base salary, or NIS
715,335
($
182,297
).
(2) For Mr. Sperling, salary continuation for these events includes three months of base salary, or NIS
357,668
($
91,149
), during his contractual notice period, a resettlement grant of NIS
1,609,504
($
410,169
), and 12 months of base salary, or NIS
1,430,670
($
364,595
), for a non-CIC termination, or 18 months of base salary, or NIS
2,146,005
($
546,892
), for a CIC termination.
59
(3) For each officer, in the case of death, disability or resignation for good cause/involuntary termination without cause, the pro-rata bonus reflects the actual bonus awarded for the year ended January 31, 2015 (notwithstanding that the formal determination of bonuses did not occur until after the end of the year). For Mr. Sperling, this amount is NIS
842,000
($
214,577
).
For each officer, for a CIC termination, the pro-rata bonus reflects the officer’s target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2015. For Mr. Sperling, this amount is
NIS 842,000
(
$214,577
).
(4) For each officer other than Mr. Bodner, in the case of a non-CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 100% of the average annual bonus awarded for the three-year period ended January 31, 2015 (notwithstanding that the formal determination of bonuses for the year ended January 31, 2015 did not occur until after the end of the year). For Mr. Sperling, this amount is NIS
895,057
($
228,098
). For Mr. Bodner, in the case of a non-CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 150% of his target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2015.
For each officer other than Mr. Bodner, for a CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 150% of the officer’s target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2015. For Mr. Sperling, this amount is NIS
1,263,000
($
321,865
). For Mr. Bodner, for a CIC termination, the additional bonus reflects 250% of the target bonus for the year ended January 31, 2015.
(5) For equity awards other than stock options, value is calculated as the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day in the year ended January 31, 2015 ($53.38 on January 30, 2015) times the number of shares accelerating. Shares accelerating includes the target number of performance shares for the January 31, 2015 performance period as well as for performance periods that had not yet been completed as of January 31, 2015. The named executive officers did not hold any stock options as of January 31, 2015.
(6) For executive officers other than Mr. Sperling, amounts shown represent the actual cost of the contractually agreed number of months of COBRA payments, including applicable income taxes. Mr. Sperling is entitled to continued health benefits during his notice period, and for a period of 12 months following a termination event, the cost of which is considered nominal.
(7) For Mr. Sperling, other benefits include three months of continued contributions to his retirement fund of NIS
19,970
($
5,089
), to his severance fund of NIS
29,569
($
7,536
), to his study fund of NIS
26,630
($
6,786
), disability insurance premiums of NIS
8,932
($
2,276
), a statutory recreation payment of NIS
756
($
193
), and use of a company car plus a fuel reimbursement allowance costing NIS
14,668
($
3,738
) for the period, for a total of NIS
100,525
($
25,618
).
(8) The tax reimbursement amount (if any) represents a reasonable estimate of costs to cover the excise tax liability under Internal Revenue Code Section 4999 and the subsequent federal, state and FICA taxes on the reimbursement payment. With respect to tax gross-ups, the assumptions used to calculate this estimate are: an excise tax rate under 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of
20%
, a federal, state (New York), and FICA tax blended rate of
48.36%
(a
40.79%
federal income tax rate, a
8.82%
state income tax rate, and a
2.35%
Medicare tax rate). To the extent applicable, we believe that a covenant not to compete value for the applicable executive officer would be sufficient to offset any “excess parachute payment.”
60
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Director Compensation for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
The following table summarizes the cash and equity compensation earned by each member of the board of directors during the year ended January 31, 2015 for service as a director.
|
Name
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
|
Stock
Awards ($)
|
Option
Awards ($)
|
Total ($)
|
||||||||
|
(1)
|
(2),(3)
|
(2)
|
||||||||||
|
Bodner, Dan
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
DeMarines, Victor
|
131,000
|
|
192,165
|
|
—
|
|
323,165
|
|
||||
|
Egan, John
|
71,152
|
|
192,165
|
|
—
|
|
263,317
|
|
||||
|
Myers, Larry
|
77,000
|
|
192,165
|
|
—
|
|
269,165
|
|
||||
|
Nottenburg, Richard
|
70,000
|
|
192,165
|
|
—
|
|
262,165
|
|
||||
|
Safir, Howard
|
81,000
|
|
192,165
|
|
—
|
|
273,165
|
|
||||
|
Shanks, Earl
|
75,000
|
|
192,165
|
|
—
|
|
267,165
|
|
||||
(1) Represents amount earned for board of directors service during the year indicated regardless of the year of payment.
(2) Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
(3) On April 17, 2014, each of our independent directors received an award of 4,243 RSUs in respect of service on the board of directors for the year ended January 31, 2015, which vested on April 8, 2015. The grant date fair value of these awards is based on the $45.29 closing price of our common stock on the April 17, 2014 grant date, however, the number of shares granted was determined by the board of directors based on the $47.13 closing price of our common stock on March 20, 2014 (the date the compensation committee had set in advance to fix the value of these awards as part of the administration of our grant process).
The following table summarizes the aggregate number of unvested stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units held by each member of our board of directors (granted for service as a director) as of January 31, 2015.
|
Name
|
Unvested Options
|
Unvested Stock Awards
|
||||
|
Bodner, Dan
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
DeMarines, Victor
|
—
|
|
4,243
|
|
||
|
Egan, John
|
—
|
|
4,243
|
|
||
|
Myers, Larry
|
—
|
|
4,243
|
|
||
|
Nottenburg, Richard
|
—
|
|
4,243
|
|
||
|
Safir, Howard
|
—
|
|
4,243
|
|
||
|
Shanks, Earl
|
—
|
|
4,243
|
|
||
Independent Directors
The board of directors is responsible for establishing independent director compensation arrangements based on recommendations from the compensation committee. These compensation arrangements are designed to provide competitive compensation necessary to attract and retain high quality independent directors. The compensation committee annually reviews our independent director compensation arrangements based on market studies or trends and from time to time engages its independent compensation consultant to prepare a customized peer group analysis. On the basis of this review, for director compensation for the year ended January 31, 2015, the compensation committee recommended and the board approved an increase in the value of the annual director equity grant from $140,000 to $200,000 and an increase in the chairmanship fee for the chairman of the board from $40,000 to $60,000 in order to increase the competitiveness of our director compensation package and better align it to the market.
61
The following summarizes the compensation package for our independent directors for the year ended January 31, 2015:
|
•
|
An annual equity grant with a value of $200,000, subject to one-year vesting;
|
|
•
|
$50,000 annual cash retainer;
|
|
•
|
No per-meeting fees; and
|
|
•
|
Annual board and committee chairmanship and membership fees as set forth below:
|
|
Committee Membership Fee
|
Chairmanship Fee
(paid in lieu of membership fee for committee chairman)
|
|
|
Board of Directors
|
N/A
|
$60,000
|
|
Audit Committee
|
$15,000
|
$27,000
|
|
Compensation Committee
|
$10,000
|
$20,000
|
|
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee
|
$6,000
|
$12,500
|
Non-Independent Directors
Mr. Bodner was the only non-independent director on our board of directors during the year ended January 31, 2015. Mr. Bodner has not been separately compensated for his service on the board of directors
Other Director Compensation Information
All directors are eligible to be reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses in attending meetings of the board of directors or of committees of the board of directors.
Our board of directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and non-employee directors who are compensated by us for their services. Our directors are also subject to our insider trading policy and an additional policy restricting hedging and pledging transactions. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines and Other Policies.”
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
No executive officer has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers who served as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee. None of the members of the compensation committee is or has ever been a Verint officer or employee.
62
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table and accompanying footnotes show information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 30, 2015 (the “Reference Date”) by:
|
•
|
each person (or group within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our common stock as of the Reference Date;
|
|
•
|
each member of our board of directors and each of our named executive officers; and
|
|
•
|
all members of our board of directors and our executive officers as a group.
|
As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting or to dispose or direct the disposition of any equity security.
|
•
|
A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that he or she has the right to acquire within 60 days from the Reference Date through the exercise of any option, warrant, or right.
|
|
•
|
Shares of our common stock subject to options, warrants, or rights which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person holding such options, warrants, or rights, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of any other person.
|
|
•
|
The amounts and percentages are based upon
61,358,001
shares of common stock outstanding as of the Reference Date.
|
|
•
|
The foregoing outstanding share number includes employee equity awards that have been settled but excludes awards that are vested but not yet delivered (if any).
|
|
•
|
The table below, however, includes awards that have vested or will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date even if the underlying shares have not yet been delivered.
|
63
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Class
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
|
Percentage of Total Shares Outstanding
|
|||||||
|
Principal Stockholders:
|
||||||||||
|
Wellington Management Group LLP
|
Common
|
5,613,312
|
|
(2
|
)
|
9.1
|
%
|
|||
|
c/o Wellington Management Company, LLP
|
||||||||||
|
280 Congress Street
|
||||||||||
|
Boston, MA 02210
|
||||||||||
|
Cadian Capital Management, LP
|
Common
|
5,280,787
|
|
(3
|
)
|
8.6
|
%
|
|||
|
535 Madison Avenue
|
||||||||||
|
36th Floor
|
||||||||||
|
New York, NY 10022
|
||||||||||
|
BlackRock, Inc.
|
Common
|
3,936,322
|
|
(4
|
)
|
6.4
|
%
|
|||
|
55 East 52nd Street
|
||||||||||
|
New York, NY 10022
|
||||||||||
|
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
|
Common
|
3,608,466
|
|
(5
|
)
|
5.9
|
%
|
|||
|
100 Vanguard Boulevard
|
||||||||||
|
Malvern, PA 19355
|
||||||||||
|
Directors and Executive Officers:
|
||||||||||
|
Dan Bodner
|
Common
|
425,665
|
|
(6
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Douglas Robinson
|
Common
|
106,083
|
|
(7
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Peter Fante
|
Common
|
5,595
|
|
(8
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Elan Moriah
|
Common
|
33,748
|
|
(9
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Meir Sperling
|
Common
|
28,628
|
|
(10
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Victor DeMarines
|
Common
|
27,848
|
|
(11
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
John Egan
|
Common
|
10,403
|
|
(12
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Larry Myers
|
Common
|
6,675
|
|
(13
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Richard Nottenburg
|
Common
|
8,170
|
|
(14
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Howard Safir
|
Common
|
12,683
|
|
(15
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
Earl Shanks
|
Common
|
14,395
|
|
(16
|
)
|
*
|
|
|||
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (twelve persons)
|
679,893
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
||||||
* Less than 1%.
64
|
(1)
|
Unless otherwise indicated and except pursuant to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each person or entity listed in the table above has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares listed as owned by such person or entity.
|
|
(2)
|
As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2015 by Wellington Management Group LLP (“Wellington”), Wellington has shared voting power over 4,580,392 shares of Verint common stock and shared dispositive power over 5,613,312 shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(3)
|
As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 17, 2015 by Cadian Capital Management, LP ("CCM"), Cadian Fund, LP (“CF”), and Eric Bannasch ("Mr. Bannasch" and, together with CCM and CF, collectively, the “Cadian Entities”), the Cadian Entities have shared voting and shared dispositive power over shares of Verint common stock as follows: CCM - 5,280,787 shares; CF - 2,883,311 shares; and Mr. Bannasch - 5,280,787 shares.
|
|
(4)
|
As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2015 by BlackRock, Inc. ("BlackRock"), BlackRock has sole voting power over 3,787,974 shares of Verint common stock and sole dispositive power over 3,936,322 shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(5)
|
As reported in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2015 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. ("Vanguard"), Vanguard has sole voting power over 80,390 shares of Verint common stock, sole dispositive power over 3,532,976 shares of Verint common stock and shared dispositive power over 75,490 shares.
|
|
(6)
|
Mr. Bodner beneficially owns 423,673 fully vested shares of Verint common stock and 1,992 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.
|
|
(7)
|
Mr. Robinson beneficially owns105,850 fully vested shares of Verint common stock and 233 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.
|
|
(8)
|
Mr. Fante beneficially owns 5,056 shares of Verint common stock and 539 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Moriah beneficially owns 33,056 fully vested shares of Verint common stock and 692 restricted stock units which will vest within 60 days of the Reference Date.
|
|
(10)
|
Mr. Sperling beneficially owns 28,628 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(11)
|
Mr. DeMarines beneficially owns 27,848 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(12)
|
Mr. Egan beneficially owns 10,403 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(13)
|
Mr. Myers beneficially owns 6,675 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(14)
|
Dr. Nottenburg beneficially owns 8,170 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(15)
|
Mr. Safir beneficially owns 12,683 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.
|
|
(16)
|
Mr. Shanks beneficially owns 14,395 fully vested shares of Verint common stock.
|
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires our directors, executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Forms 4 or 5 with the SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders also are required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us, or written representations that no reports were required, we believe that during the year ended January 31, 2015, our directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders complied with all filing requirements, except that a Form 4 related to the sale of 5,029 shares of restricted stock by Mr. Myers on September 11, 2014 was filed on March 16, 2015 due to an administrative error by Mr. Myers' broker in communicating the applicable trade information.
65
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Under our audit committee charter, all related-party transactions (as described in Item 404 of Regulation S-K and relevant SEC and stock exchange rules) other than director and officer compensation arrangements approved by the full board of directors or the compensation committee must be approved in advance by our audit committee. In addition to the requirements of our audit committee charter, we have a written policy regarding the approval of related-party transactions. Such policy provides that any related-party transaction, which includes any financial transaction, arrangement, or relationship between us and a related party, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships between us and a related party, where the aggregate amount involved will or is expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, must be described in writing and submitted to our Chief Compliance Officer prior to the transaction. Such proposed related-party transaction must be reviewed by our Chief Compliance Officer and/or Chief Financial Officer and must be submitted to our audit committee for its review and approval. Our Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and audit committee will consider several factors in their review, including the fairness of the terms of the transaction, the role of the related party in the transaction, and whether the transaction could have an effect on the status of any director or director nominees as an independent director under applicable rules. The audit committee has reviewed and approved all of the agreements and transactions referred to in this section.
The following summarizes various agreements and arrangements that were in effect during the period beginning on February 1, 2014 (the first day of our most recently completed fiscal year) and ending on the date of this proxy statement between us and related parties, principally CTI, our former majority stockholder, and its affiliates.
CTI Merger Agreement
On August 12, 2012, we entered into the CTI Merger Agreement providing for the CTI Merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the CTI Merger Agreement. The CTI Merger was completed on February 4, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the CTI Merger Agreement, each share of CTI common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the CTI Merger was converted into the right to receive new shares of our common stock at an exchange ratio of 0.1298 shares of our common stock for each share of CTI common stock. In addition, each outstanding share of our Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("Preferred Stock") and each outstanding share of our common stock held by CTI immediately prior to the effective time of the CTI Merger was canceled. Immediately following the effective time of the CTI Merger, former CTI shareholders owned approximately 54.6% of our common stock outstanding after completion of the CTI Merger.
Pursuant to the terms of the CTI Merger Agreement, the completion of the CTI Merger was contingent upon, among other things, CTI's completion of a distribution to its shareholders of substantially all of its assets other than its interest in us (the "Comverse share distribution") or another sale or disposition by CTI of those assets (a "Comverse disposition").
The share exchange provision of the CTI Merger Agreement provided that each holder of shares of CTI common stock would receive new shares of our common stock representing such holder's pro rata portion of an aggregate number of shares of our common stock equal to the sum of (1) the shares of our common stock held by CTI immediately prior to the completion of the CTI Merger (including the shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the shares of our Preferred Stock held by CTI at a conversion price of $32.66), plus (2) additional shares of our common stock the number of which is equal to the $25 million Target Amount (described below) divided by the average of the daily volume weighted averages of the trading prices of our common stock on NASDAQ during the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the CTI Merger, plus (3) additional shares of our common stock based on the positive net worth of CTI (as determined in accordance with the CTI Merger Agreement) immediately prior to the completion of the CTI Merger, up to a maximum dollar value of $10 million. Under the CTI Merger Agreement, the Target Amount was determined based on the timing of the Comverse share distribution or a Comverse disposition and the level of CTI's beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock following the date of the CTI Merger Agreement.
Under the terms of the CTI Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of our common stock and our Preferred Stock held by CTI at the effective time of the CTI Merger was canceled. Holders of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the completion of the CTI Merger, other than CTI, continued to own their existing shares, which were not affected by the CTI Merger.
The CTI Merger Agreement restricted CTI from amending or modifying the terms of the agreements relating to the Comverse share distribution from the forms attached to the CTI Merger Agreement without our consent if those amendments or modifications would adversely affect our rights or the rights of CTI under those agreements in any material respect, including without limitation the right of CTI to be indemnified for specified losses related to its former subsidiary, Comverse, Inc. ("Comverse").
66
Comverse Share Distribution Agreement and Tax Disaffiliation Agreement
On October 31, 2012, CTI completed the Comverse share distribution in which it distributed all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Comverse to CTI's shareholders. As a result of the Comverse share distribution, Comverse became an independent publicly held company and ceased to be a wholly owned subsidiary of CTI.
Distribution Agreement
In connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse and CTI entered into a Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012 (the "Distribution Agreement"). We were a third-party beneficiary of that agreement and assumed CTI's rights and obligations under that agreement in connection with the CTI Merger. The Distribution Agreement sets forth the agreement between CTI and Comverse regarding the principal transactions necessary to separate Comverse from CTI. It also sets forth other agreements that govern certain aspects of CTI's relationship with Comverse following the completion of the Comverse share distribution and provides certain indemnities to CTI and its affiliates (including us) related to the CTI Merger Agreement, the Comverse share distribution and the Comverse business.
Distribution
. Under the terms of the Distribution Agreement, on October 31, 2012, CTI distributed to its shareholders one share of Comverse common stock for every ten shares of CTI common stock held by its shareholders. Fractional shares were aggregated and sold in the public market by the distribution agent at prevailing market prices, with the net proceeds distributed to each of the holders that were otherwise entitled to receive the fractional shares.
Transfer of Assets and Assumptions of Liabilities
. The Distribution Agreement identified certain transfers of assets and assumptions of liabilities that were necessary in advance of the Comverse share distribution so that each of CTI and Comverse retained the assets of, and the liabilities associated with, their respective businesses. The Distribution Agreement also provided for the settlement or extinguishment of certain liabilities and other obligations between CTI and Comverse as well as procedures for the conveyance to the proper party of assets or liabilities that were initially misallocated.
Release of Claims
. Comverse agreed to broad releases pursuant to which it released CTI and its affiliates, successors and assigns from, and indemnified and held harmless all such persons against and from, any claims against any of them arising out of or relating to the management of Comverse's business, certain events that took place prior to the Comverse share distribution, the Comverse share distribution, the terms of the Distribution Agreement and the other agreements entered into in connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse's post-share distribution certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and any other decision made or action taken relating to Comverse. The releases did not extend to obligations or liabilities under any agreements between CTI and Comverse that remained in effect following the Comverse share distribution.
Exchange of Information
. CTI and Comverse agreed to provide each other with information relating to the other party or the conduct of its business prior to the Comverse share distribution, and information reasonably necessary to prepare financial statements and any reports or filings to be made with any governmental authority. CTI and Comverse also agreed to retain such information in accordance with their respective record retention policies as in effect on the date of the Distribution Agreement or as otherwise required by law or agreement.
Access to Information; Witnesses; Confidentiality
. CTI and Comverse each agreed to allow the other party and its representatives reasonable access to all records in its possession relating to the business and affairs of the other party, including for audit, accounting, litigation, income taxes, financial reporting and regulatory compliance purposes. CTI and Comverse also agreed to use reasonable efforts to make available to the other party and its accountants, counsel and other designated representatives, upon written request, its directors, officers, employees and representatives as witnesses and to otherwise cooperate with the other party in connection with any proceeding arising out of its or the other party's business and operation before the Comverse share distribution. Subject to limited exceptions, each party agreed to hold confidential all information in its or their possession concerning the other party.
Indemnification
. CTI and Comverse agreed to indemnify each other and each of their respective affiliates and representatives, and each of the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of such representatives, against certain liabilities in connection with their respective businesses and any breach by such party of the Distribution Agreement. These respective indemnity obligations under the Distribution Agreement are not subject to time limitation.
In addition, under the Distribution Agreement, Comverse agreed to indemnify CTI and its affiliates (including us) against certain losses that may arise as a result of the CTI Merger and the Comverse share distribution. Certain of these indemnification obligations are capped at $25.0 million and certain are uncapped. Specifically, the capped indemnification obligations include indemnifying us against losses stemming from breaches by CTI of representations, warranties and covenants made to us in the CTI Merger Agreement and for any liabilities of CTI that were known by CTI but not included on the net worth statement delivered to us at the closing of the CTI Merger. Comverse's uncapped indemnification obligations include indemnifying us against liabilities relating to Comverse's business; claims by any shareholder or creditor of CTI related
67
to the Comverse share distribution, the CTI Merger or related transactions or disclosure documents; certain claims made by employees or former employees of CTI and any claims made by employees and former employees of Comverse; any failure by Comverse to perform under any of the agreements entered into in connection with the Comverse share distribution; claims related to CTI's ownership or operation of Comverse; claims related to the disposition of CTI's ownership interest in Starhome B.V.; certain retained liabilities of CTI that were not reflected on or reserved against on the net worth statement delivered to us by CTI at the closing of the CTI Merger; and claims arising out of the exercise of appraisal rights by a CTI shareholder in connection with the Comverse share distribution. CTI agreed to place $25.0 million in cash in escrow at the completion of the CTI Merger to support certain indemnification claims to the extent made against Comverse by us. Any amounts remaining in the escrow account at the 18 month anniversary of the closing of the CTI Merger (excluding amounts set aside for existing liability claims) were released to Comverse. Comverse also assumed all pre-Comverse share distribution tax obligations of each of Comverse and CTI.
Tax Disaffiliation Agreement
In connection with the Comverse share distribution, Comverse and CTI entered into a Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012 (the "Tax Disaffiliation Agreement"). The Tax Disaffiliation Agreement governs CTI's and Comverse's respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to both pre- and post-Comverse share distribution periods, including tax liabilities and benefits, the preparation and filing of tax returns, and the control of audits and other tax matters. CTI and Comverse entered into the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement effective as of the effective date of the Comverse share distribution. In general, Comverse is required under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement to pay (a) all CTI pre-disposition group taxes attributable to periods ending on or before the date of the Comverse share distribution and the portion of any straddle period ending on the date of the Comverse share distribution, and (b) all Comverse group taxes attributable to periods beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution and the portion of any straddle period beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution. In general, CTI is required under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement to pay all CTI group taxes attributable to periods beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution and the portion of any straddle period beginning on the day after the date of the Comverse share distribution. Comverse's obligations under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement are not limited in amount or subject to any cap. The Tax Disaffiliation Agreement also contains obligations for each of CTI and Comverse to indemnify the other for breaches of its obligations under such agreement, including in respect of payment of taxes for which it is responsible. Any claim for indemnity under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement must be made within 60 days after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations for the assessment of the tax that is the subject of such indemnity claim.
68
AUDIT MATTERS
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures
The audit committee of our board of directors is directly responsible for the appointment, oversight, and evaluation of our independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with the audit committee’s charter, it must approve, in advance of the service, all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and establish policies and procedures for the engagement of the outside auditor to provide audit and permissible non-audit services. Our independent registered public accounting firm may not be retained to perform non-audit services specified in Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act.
The committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The audit committee appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as our auditors for the years ended January 31, 2015 and 2014. Deloitte & Touche LLP has advised the audit committee that they are independent accountants with respect to Verint, within the meaning of standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Independence Standards Board and federal securities laws administered by the SEC.
In conjunction with our management, the audit committee regularly reviews the services and fees from our independent registered public accounting firm. Our audit committee has determined that the providing of certain non-audit services, as described below, is compatible with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
In addition to performing the audit of our consolidated financial statements, Deloitte & Touche LLP provided various other services during the years ended January 31, 2015 and 2014. Our audit committee has determined that these services did not impair Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence from Verint.
Fees of Independent Registered Public Accountants
During the years ended January 31, 2015 and 2014, we retained Deloitte & Touche LLP to provide professional services in the following categories and amounts:
|
Year Ended January 31,
|
||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Audit fees (1)
|
$
|
4,768
|
|
$
|
4,547
|
|
||
|
Audit-related fees (2)
|
16
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Tax fees (3)
|
122
|
|
113
|
|
||||
|
All other fees (4)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Total fees
|
$
|
4,906
|
|
$
|
4,660
|
|
||
(1) “Audit fees” include fees for audit services principally related to the year-end examination and the quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements, consultation on matters that arise during a review or audit, review of SEC filings, audit services performed in connection with our acquisitions, and statutory audit fees.
(2) “Audit-related fees” include fees which are for assurance and related services other than those included in Audit fees.
(3) “Tax fees” include fees for tax compliance and advice.
(4) “All other fees” include fees for all other non-audit services.
69
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Role of the Audit Committee
The primary purpose of the audit committee is to assist the board of directors in its general oversight of Verint’s financial reporting process, including its internal controls and audit functions, as well as oversight of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers and the Code of Conduct for all employees. The responsibilities of the audit committee are more fully described in its charter, which can be found on our website at
http://www.verint.com/About/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-policies
. One of the audit committee’s key responsibilities, as reflected in its charter, is to select, compensate, evaluate, and, when appropriate, replace Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee has the authority to engage its own outside advisers, including experts in particular areas of accounting, as it determines appropriate, apart from counsel or advisers hired by management.
Review of Verint’s Audited Financial Statements for the Year Ended January 31, 2015
Management is primarily responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of Verint’s financial statements. The audit committee reviews Verint’s financial statements on a quarterly and annual basis, and in connection with these reviews, it discusses Verint’s financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee has reviewed Verint’s audited financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2015 and discussed them with management. In March 2015, the audit committee reviewed Verint’s audited financial statements and footnotes for inclusion in Verint’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015. Based on this review and prior discussions with management and the independent registered public accountants as described below, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that Verint’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015 for filing with the SEC.
Review and Discussions with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements of Verint, and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. Deloitte & Touche LLP is also responsible for performing a review of Verint’s quarterly financial results, which are published in our earnings releases and Forms 10-Q.
The audit committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards (“SAS”) No. 61, as amended by SAS No. 89, SAS No. 90 and Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s judgments about the quality of Verint’s accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting. The audit committee has also received written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence, including considering whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to Verint is compatible with the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence.
The audit committee discussed with Verint’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for its audit. The audit committee met with the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss the results of its examinations, the evaluations of Verint’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Verint’s financial reporting. The audit committee also met in private sessions with the independent registered public accounting firm at certain of its meetings, without management present, to discuss financial management, accounting, and internal control issues.
|
Audit Committee:
|
|
|
Larry Myers, Chair
|
|
|
Victor DeMarines
|
|
|
Howard Safir
|
|
|
Earl Shanks
|
|
70
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING
Proposals which stockholders desire to have included in our proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting, pursuant to Exchange Act Regulation 14a-8, must be addressed to our Corporate Secretary and received by us not later than the close of business on January 14, 2016. Such proposals must be addressed to Verint Systems Inc., at 330 South Service Road, Melville, New York 11747, and should be submitted to the attention of our Corporate Secretary by certified mail, return receipt requested. SEC rules establish a different deadline for submission of stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in our proxy statement with respect to discretionary voting. The deadline for these proposals for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is March 29, 2016. Our proxy related to the 2016 Annual Meeting may give discretionary authority to the proxy holders to vote with respect to all such proposals received by us. The requirements found in our Amended and Restated By-laws are separate from and in addition to the requirements of the SEC that a stockholder must meet to have a proposal included in our proxy statement.
In accordance with our Amended and Restated By-laws, any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at the Annual Meeting may nominate persons for election as directors at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders only if our Corporate Secretary receives written notice of any such nominations no earlier than February 26, 2016 and no later than March 27, 2016. Any stockholder notice of intention to nominate a director shall include:
|
•
|
as to the nominee:
|
|
•
|
the name, age, business address and residential address of such person;
|
|
•
|
the principal occupation or employment of such person;
|
|
•
|
the class, series and number of our securities that are owned of record or beneficially by such person;
|
|
•
|
the date or dates the securities were acquired and the investment intent of each acquisition;
|
|
•
|
any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (or any comparable successor rule or regulation);
|
|
•
|
any other information relating to such person that the board of directors or any nominating committee of the board of directors reviews in considering any person for nomination as a director, as will be provided by our Corporate Secretary upon request; and
|
|
•
|
as to the stockholder giving the notice and any Stockholder Associate (as such term is defined below):
|
|
•
|
the name and address of the stockholder, as they appear on our stock ledger, and, if different, the current name and address of the stockholder, and the name and address of any Stockholder Associate;
|
|
•
|
a representation that at least one of these persons is a holder of record or beneficially of our securities entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to remain so through the date of the meeting and to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the stockholder’s notice;
|
|
•
|
the class, series and number of our securities that are owned of record or beneficially by each of these persons as of the date of the stockholder’s notice;
|
|
•
|
a description of any material relationships, including legal, financial and/or compensatory, among the stockholder giving the notice, any Stockholder Associate and the proposed nominee(s);
|
|
•
|
a description of any derivative positions related to any class or series of our securities owned of record or beneficially by the stockholder or any Stockholder Associate;
|
|
•
|
a description of whether and the extent to which any hedging, swap or other transaction or series of transactions has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any short position or any borrowing or lending of securities) has been made, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, or manage risk of stock price changes for, or to increase the voting power of, the stockholder or any Stockholder Associate with respect to any of our securities; and
|
|
•
|
a representation that after the date of the stockholder’s notice and until the date of the annual meeting each of these persons will provide written notice to our Corporate Secretary as soon as practicable following a change in the number of our securities held as described immediately above that equals 1% or more of our then-outstanding shares, and/or entry, termination, amendment or modification of the agreements, arrangements or
|
71
understanding described immediately above that results in a change that equals 1% or more of our then-outstanding shares or in the economic interests underlying these agreements, arrangements or understanding;
|
•
|
a representation as to whether the stockholder giving notice and any Stockholder Associate intends, or intends to be part of a group that intends: (A) to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to stockholders; and/or (B) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of the proposed nominee; and
|
|
•
|
a written consent of each proposed nominee to serve as a director of Verint, if elected, and a representation that the proposed nominee (A) does not or will not have any undisclosed voting commitments or other arrangements with respect to his or her actions as a director; and (B) will comply with our By-laws and all of our applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines.
|
For purposes of the notice, a “Stockholder Associate” of any stockholder means (1) any person controlling, directly or indirectly, or acting in concert with, the stockholder; (2) any beneficial owner of securities of Verint owned of record or beneficially by the stockholder; and (3) any person controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Stockholder Associate.
At the request of the board of directors, any person nominated by the board of directors for election as a director must furnish to our Corporate Secretary that information required to be set forth in a stockholder’s notice of nomination which pertains to the nominee or such other information as it may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of such nominee to serve as a director.
However, if the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting is increased and we do not make a public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the board of directors by at least February 3, 2016, then a stockholder’s notice will be considered timely with respect to nominees for the new positions created by the increase if it is received by our Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on the tenth calendar day after we make such public announcement.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
We will bear the costs of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers, and employees by personal interview or telephone. Such directors, officers, and employees will not be additionally compensated for such solicitation, but may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by such persons, and we may reimburse such brokerage houses, custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation.
ANNUAL REPORT
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015, was filed with the SEC on March 27, 2015, and such Form 10-K is being sent to stockholders or made available via the Internet on or about May 13, 2015. Stockholders are referred to that report for financial and other information about us. A copy of that report can be obtained, free of charge, by submitting a written request to Verint Systems Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 330 South Service Road, Melville, New York 11747. That report is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and is not to be deemed a part of the proxy soliciting material.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Kohl
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary
|
|
Melville, New York
May 13, 2015
72
APPENDIX A
VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
2015 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Section 1.
Purpose
. The purposes of this Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan are to promote the interests of Verint Systems Inc. and its stockholders by (i) attracting and retaining employees and directors of, and consultants to, the Company and its Subsidiaries, as defined below; (ii) motivating such individuals by means of performance-related incentives to achieve longer-range performance goals; and (iii) enabling such individuals to participate in the long-term growth and financial success of the Company.
Section 2.
Definitions
. As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
“Affiliate” means any entity other than the Subsidiaries in which the Company has a substantial direct or indirect equity interest, as determined by the Board.
“Award” shall mean any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit Award, Performance Award, Other Stock-Based Award or Performance Compensation Award made or granted from time to time hereunder.
“Award Agreement” shall mean any written agreement, contract, or other instrument or document evidencing any Award, which may, but need not, be executed or acknowledged by a Participant. An Award Agreement may be in an electronic medium and may be limited to notation on the books and records of the Company.
“Base Salary” means the base salary or wages of the Participant excluding overtime, bonuses, contributions to or benefits under benefit plans, fringe benefits, perquisites, and other such forms of compensation. Base Salary shall include any elective contributions that are paid through a reduction in a Participant’s basic salary and which are not includible in the Participant’s gross income under Sections 125 or 402(e)(3) of the Code.
“Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
“Cause” as a reason for a Participant’s termination of employment or service shall, unless otherwise agreed to in writing between the Participant and the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, have the meaning assigned such term in the employment, severance or similar agreement, if any, between the Participant and the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company. If the Participant is not a party to an employment, severance or similar agreement with the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company in which such term is defined, then unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement “Cause” shall mean the Participant’s: (A) conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony or indictment for a crime involving dishonesty, fraud or moral turpitude; (B) willful and intentional breach of the Participant’s obligations to the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company; (C) willful misconduct, or any dishonest or fraudulent act or omission; (D) violation of any securities or financial reporting laws, rules or regulations or any policy of the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company relating to the foregoing; (E) violation of the policies of the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company on harassment, discrimination or substance abuse; or (F) gross negligence, gross neglect of duties or gross insubordination in the Participant’s performance of duties with the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company.
“Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if the event set forth in any one of the following subparagraphs shall have occurred:
i. the acquisition by any Person, entity or affiliated group in one or a series of transactions, of more than 50% of the voting power of the Company;
ii. a merger, combination, amalgamation, consolidation, spin-off or any other transaction in which the holders of the Company’s common stock immediately prior to such transaction do not hold in respect of their holdings of such stock 50% or more of the voting power of the merged, combined, amalgamated, consolidated, spun-off or other resulting entity;
73
iii. a sale or other disposition, in one or a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (including its Subsidiaries); or
iv. during any period of two consecutive years, Incumbent Directors cease to constitute at least a majority of the board. “Incumbent Directors” shall mean: (1) the directors who were serving at the beginning of such two-year period, or (2) any directors whose election or nomination was approved by the directors referred to in clause (1) or by a director approved under this clause (2).
“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
“Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board (or its successor(s)), or any other committee of the Board designated by the Board to administer the Plan and composed of not less than two directors, each of whom is required to be a “Non-Employee Director” (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3) and an “outside director” (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code) to the extent Rule 16b-3 and Section 162(m) of the Code, respectively, are applicable to the Company and the Plan. If at any time such a committee has not been so designated or is not so composed, the Board shall constitute the Committee.
“Company” shall mean Verint Systems Inc., together with any successor thereto.
“Continuous Service” shall mean the absence of any interruption or termination of service as an employee, director or consultant. Continuous Service shall not be considered interrupted in the case of (i) sick leave; (ii) military leave; (iii) any other leave of absence approved by the Committee, in each case, provided that such leave is for a period of not more than 90 days, unless reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is guaranteed by contract or applicable law, or unless provided otherwise pursuant to Company policy, as adopted from time to time; or (iv)
in the case of transfer between locations of the Company or between the Company, its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or their respective successors. Changes in status between service as an employee, a director and a consultant will not constitute an interruption of Continuous Service;
provided, however,
that, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, consultants providing services to the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company for less than 32 hours per month shall incur an interruption of Continuous Service.
“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
“Fair Market Value” shall mean, unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement (i) with respect to any property other than Shares, the fair market value of such property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Committee and (ii) with respect to the Shares, as of any date, (1) the closing sale price (excluding any “after hours” trading) of the Shares as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market for such date (or if not then trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market, the closing sale price of the Shares on the stock exchange or over-the-counter market on which the Shares are principally trading on such date), or, if there were no sales on such date, on the closest preceding date on which there were sales of Shares or (2) in the event there shall be no public market for the Shares on such date, the fair market value of the Shares as determined in good faith by the Committee.
“GAAP” shall mean United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
“Good Reason” as a reason for a Participant’s termination of employment or service shall, unless otherwise agreed to in writing between the Participant and the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, have the meaning assigned such term in the employment, severance or similar agreement, if any, between the Participant and the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company. If the Participant is not a party to an employment, severance agreement or similar agreement with the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company in which such term is defined, then unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement, for purposes of this Plan, “Good Reason” shall mean (i) a material reduction (i.e., at least a 10% reduction) by the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company in the Participant’s Base Salary; or (ii) the involuntary relocation of the Participant’s own office location by more than 50 miles; provided that all such events shall be Good Reason only if the Company (or the applicable Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company) fails to cure such event within 30 days after receipt from the Participant of written notice of the event which constitutes Good Reason; provided, further, that Good Reason shall cease to exist for an event on the 90th day following the later of its occurrence or the Participant’s knowledge thereof, unless the Participant has given the Company written notice thereof prior to such date.
“Incentive Stock Option” shall mean a right to purchase Shares from the Company that is granted under Section 6 of the Plan and that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any successor provision thereto. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Participants who meet the definition of “employees” under Section 3401(c) of the Code.
74
“Negative Discretion” shall mean the discretion authorized by the Plan to be applied by the Committee to eliminate or reduce the size of a Performance Compensation Award;
provided
that the exercise of such discretion would not cause the Performance Compensation Award to fail to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. By way of example and not by way of limitation, in no event shall any discretionary authority granted to the Committee by the Plan including, but not limited to, Negative Discretion, be used to (a) grant or provide payment in respect of Performance Compensation Awards for a Performance Period if the Performance Goals for such Performance Period have not been attained or (b) increase a Performance Compensation Award above the maximum amount payable under Section 4(a) or 11(d)(vi) of the Plan. In no event shall Negative Discretion be exercised by the Committee with respect to any Option or Stock Appreciation Right (other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right that is intended to be a Performance Compensation Award under Section 11 of the Plan).
“Non-Qualified Stock Option” shall mean a right to purchase Shares from the Company that is granted under Section 6 of the Plan and that is not intended to be an Incentive Stock Option.
“Option” shall mean an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
“Other Stock-Based Award” shall mean any right granted under Section 10 of the Plan.
“Participant” shall mean any (i) employee of, or consultant to, the Company or its Subsidiaries, or non-employee director who is a member of the Board or the board of directors of a Subsidiary of the Company, eligible for an Award under Section 5 and selected by the Committee to receive an Award under the Plan or (ii) any employee of, or consultant to, an Affiliate, eligible for a cash-settled Performance Award or cash-settled Restricted Stock Unit under Section 5 and selected by the Committee to receive a cash-settled Performance Award or a cash-settled Restricted Stock Unit under the Plan.
“Performance Award” shall mean any right granted under Section 9 of the Plan.
“Performance Compensation Award” shall mean any Award designated by the Committee as a Performance Compensation Award pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan.
“Performance Criteria” shall mean the measurable criterion or criteria that the Committee shall select for purposes of establishing the Performance Goal(s) for a Performance Period with respect to any performance-based award under the Plan, including, but not limited to, Performance Compensation Awards. The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish the Performance Goal(s) shall be based on the attainment of specific levels of performance of the Company (or a Subsidiary, Affiliate, division or operational unit of the Company) and shall be limited to the following, whether determined on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis: revenue, operating income, contribution, day sales outstanding, return on net assets, return on stockholders’ equity, return on assets, return on capital, stockholder returns (on an absolute or relative basis), profit margin, operating margin, contribution margin, earnings per Share, net earnings, operating earnings, free cash flow, cash flow from operations, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), including adjusted EBITDA, number of customers, operating expenses, capital expenses, customer acquisition costs, Share price, sales, bookings, or market share.
“Performance Formula” shall mean, for a Performance Period, one or more objective formulas applied against the relevant Performance Goal to determine, with regard to the Performance Compensation Award of a particular Participant, whether all, some portion but less than all, or none of the Performance Compensation Award has been earned for the Performance Period.
“Performance Goals” shall mean, for a Performance Period, one or more goals established by the Committee for the Performance Period based upon the Performance Criteria. To the extent required under Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to Awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall, within the first 90 days of a Performance Period (or, if shorter, within the maximum period allowed under Section 162(m) of the Code), define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the Performance Criteria it selects to use for such Performance Period. The Committee is authorized at any time during the first 90 days of a Performance Period (or, if shorter, within the maximum period allowed under Section 162(m) of the Code for establishing Performance Goals), or at any time thereafter (but only to the extent the exercise of such authority after such period would not cause any Performance Compensation Awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code granted to any Participant for the Performance Period to fail to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code), in its sole discretion, to adjust or modify the calculation of a Performance Goal for such Performance Period to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, if applicable, in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants, (a) in the event of, or in anticipation of, any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event or development affecting the Company; or (b) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any other unusual or nonrecurring events
75
affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions.
“Performance Period” shall mean the one or more periods of time of at least six months in duration, as the Committee may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Participant’s right to and the payment of a performance-based award, including a Performance Compensation Award.
“Person” has the meaning given in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, as modified and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, except that such term shall not include (i) the Company and its Subsidiaries, (ii) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its affiliates, (iii) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (iv) a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareowners of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company.
“Plan” shall mean this Verint Systems Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.
“Restricted Stock” shall mean any Share granted under Section 8 of the Plan.
“Restricted Stock Unit” shall mean any unit granted under Section 8 of the Plan.
“Rule 16b-3” shall mean Rule 16b-3 as promulgated and interpreted by the SEC under the Exchange Act, or any successor rule or regulation thereto as in effect from time to time.
“SEC” shall mean the Securities and Exchange Commission or any successor thereto and shall include the Staff thereof.
“Shares” shall mean the common stock of the Company, $.001 par value, or such other securities of the Company (i) into which such common stock shall be changed by reason of a recapitalization, merger, consolidation, split-up, combination, exchange of shares or other similar transaction or (ii) as may be determined by the Committee pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Plan.
“Stock Appreciation Right” shall mean any right granted under Section 7 of the Plan.
“Subsidiary” of any Person means another Person (other than a natural Person), an aggregate amount of the voting securities, other voting ownership or voting partnership interests, of which is sufficient to elect at least a majority of the Board or other governing body (or, if there are no such voting interests, 50% or more of the equity interests of which is owned directly or indirectly by such first Person).
“Substitute Awards” shall mean any Awards granted under Section 4(a)(iii) of the Plan.
Section 3.
Administration
.
(a)
The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law, and in addition to other express powers and authorizations conferred on the Committee by the Plan, the Committee shall have full power and authority to: (i) designate Participants; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards to be granted to a Participant and designate those Awards which shall constitute Performance Compensation Awards; (iii) determine the number of Shares to be covered by, or with respect to which payments, rights, or other matters are to be calculated in connection with, Awards; (iv) determine the terms and conditions of any Award; (v) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled or exercised in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards or other property, or canceled, forfeited, or suspended and the method or methods by which Awards may be settled, exercised, canceled, forfeited, or suspended; (vi) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, other property, and other amounts payable with respect to an Award (subject to Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to any Performance Compensation Awards) shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the holder thereof or of the Committee (in each case consistent with Section 409A of the Code); (vii) interpret, administer or reconcile any inconsistency, correct any defect, resolve ambiguities and/or supply any omission in the Plan, any Award Agreement, and any other instrument or agreement relating to, or Award made under, the Plan; (viii) establish, amend, suspend, or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; (ix) establish and administer Performance Goals and certify whether, and to what extent, they have been attained; (x) adopt and approve any supplements to or amendments, restatements or alternative versions of the Plan (including, without limitation, sub-plans) in accordance with
76
Section 14(n) of the Plan; and (xi) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.
(b)
Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, all designations, determinations, interpretations, and other decisions under or with respect to the Plan or any Award shall be within the sole discretion of the Committee, may be made at any time and shall be final, conclusive, and binding upon all Persons, including the Company, any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, any Participant, any holder or beneficiary of any Award, and any stockholder.
(c)
The mere fact that a Committee member shall fail to qualify as a “Non-Employee Director” or “outside director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 and Section 162(m) of the Code, respectively, shall not invalidate any Award made by the Committee which Award is otherwise validly made under the Plan.
(d)
No member of the Committee shall be liable to any Person for any action or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Award hereunder.
(e)
With respect to any Performance Compensation Award granted to a Covered Employee (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code) under the Plan, the Plan shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code.
(f)
The Committee may delegate to one or more officers of the Company (or, in the case of awards of Shares, the Board may delegate to a committee made up of one or more directors) the authority to grant Awards to Participants who are not executive officers or directors of the Company subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or Covered Employees (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code).
Section 4.
Shares Available for Awards
.
(a)
Shares Available
.
(i)
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(b), the aggregate number of Shares with respect to which Awards may be granted from time to time under the Plan shall in the aggregate not exceed, at any time, 9,700,000;
provided
, that, subject to adjustment as provided for in Section 4(b), the aggregate number of Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under the Plan shall be 5,000,000. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(b), the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted to any Participant in any fiscal year shall be 2,000,000 and the maximum number of Shares which may be paid to a Participant in the Plan in connection with the settlement of any Award(s) designated as “Performance Compensation Awards” in respect of a single fiscal year shall be 2,000,000 or, in the event such Performance Compensation Award is paid in cash, the equivalent cash value thereof on the first day of the Performance Period to which such Performance Compensation Award relates, and the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Awards (including, without limitation, Options and Stock Appreciation Rights) may be granted to any single non-employee member of the Board in any fiscal year shall be 500,000 Shares. In the case of any Awards granted under the Plan, (x) each Share with respect to which an Option or stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right is granted under the Plan shall reduce the aggregate number of Shares that may be delivered under the Plan by one Share and (y) each share with respect to which any other Award denominated in Shares (other than an Option or stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right) is granted under the Plan shall reduce the aggregate number of Shares that may be delivered under the Plan by 2.29 Shares.
(ii)
If any Shares subject to an Award are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged, withheld or surrendered or if an Award terminates or expires without a distribution of Shares to the Participant, the Shares with respect to such Award shall, to the extent of any such forfeiture, cancellation, exchange, surrender, withholding, termination or expiration, again be available for Awards under the Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, if two Awards are granted together in tandem, the Shares underlying any portion of the tandem Award which is not exercised or otherwise settled in Shares will again be available for Awards under the Plan. Upon payment in cash of the benefit provided by any Award granted under this Plan, any Shares that were covered by that Award will again be available for Awards under the Plan. If, under this Plan, a Participant has elected to give up the right to receive compensation in exchange for Shares based on fair market value, such Shares will not count against the aggregate limit described in Section 4(a)(i).
(iii)
Awards may, in the discretion of the Committee, be made under the Plan in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines (“Substitute Awards”). The number of Shares underlying any Substitute Awards shall not be counted against the aggregate number of Shares available for Awards under the Plan.
77
(b)
Adjustments
. Notwithstanding any provisions of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that the Committee determines that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Shares or other securities of the Company, or other corporate transaction or event affects the Shares such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, then the Committee shall equitably adjust any or all of (i) the number of Shares or other securities of the Company (or number and kind of other securities or property) with respect to which Awards may be granted, (ii) the number of Shares or other securities of the Company (or number and kind of other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards, and (iii) the grant or exercise price with respect to any Award or, if deemed appropriate, make provision for a cash payment to the holder of an outstanding Award in consideration for the cancellation of such Award, which, in the case of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall equal the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of the Share subject to each such Option or Stock Appreciation Right over the per Share exercise price or grant price of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right. The Committee will also make or provide for such adjustments in the number of shares specified in Section 4(a)(i) of this Plan as the Committee in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith, may determine is appropriate to reflect any transaction or event described in this Section 4(b);
provided, however
, that any such adjustment to the numbers specified in Section 4(a)(i) will be made only if and to the extent that such adjustment would not cause any Option intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option to fail to so qualify.
(c)
Sources of Shares Deliverable Under Awards
. Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Shares or of treasury Shares.
Section 5.
Eligibility
. Any employee of, or consultant to, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (including any prospective employee), or non-employee director who is a member of the Board or the board of directors of a Subsidiary of the Company, shall be eligible to be selected as a Participant and receive any Award as determined by the Committee. Any employee of, or consultant to, an Affiliate (including any prospective employee), shall be eligible to be selected as a Participant and receive any cash-settled Performance Award or cash-settled Restricted Stock Unit as determined by the Committee.
Section 6.
Stock Options
.
(a)
Grant
. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole authority to determine the Participants to whom Options shall be granted, the number of Shares to be covered by each Option, the exercise price thereof and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise of the Option. The Committee shall have the authority to grant Incentive Stock Options, or to grant Non-Qualified Stock Options, or to grant both types of Options. In the case of Incentive Stock Options, the terms and conditions of such grants shall be subject to and comply with such rules as may be prescribed by Section 422 of the Code, as from time to time amended, and any regulations implementing such statute. All Options when granted under the Plan are intended to be Non-Qualified Stock Options, unless the applicable Award Agreement expressly states that the Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option. If an Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option, and if for any reason such Option (or any portion thereof) shall not qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, then, to the extent of such nonqualification, such Option (or portion thereof) shall be regarded as a Non-Qualified Stock Option appropriately granted under the Plan;
provided
that such Option (or portion thereof) otherwise complies with the Plan’s requirements relating to Non-Qualified Stock Options. No Option shall be exercisable more than ten years from the date of grant.
(b)
Exercise Price
. The Committee shall establish the exercise price at the time each Option is granted, which exercise price shall be set forth in the applicable Award Agreement and which exercise price (except with respect to Substitute Awards) shall not be less than the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant.
(c)
Exercise
. Each Option shall be exercisable at such times and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, specify in the applicable Award Agreement. The applicable Award Agreement shall specify the period or periods of Continuous Service by the Participant that is necessary before the Option or installments thereof will become exercisable. The Committee may impose such conditions with respect to the exercise of Options, including without limitation, any relating to the application of federal or state securities laws, as it may deem necessary or advisable.
(d)
Payment
.
(i)
No Shares shall be delivered pursuant to any exercise of an Option until payment in full of the aggregate exercise price therefor is received by the Company. Such payment may be made (A) in cash, or its equivalent, or
78
(B) subject to the Company’s consent, by exchanging Shares owned by the optionee (which are not the subject of any pledge or other security interest and which have been owned by such optionee for at least six months), or (C) subject to such rules as may be established by the Committee and applicable law, through delivery of irrevocable instructions to a broker to sell the Shares otherwise deliverable upon the exercise of the Option and to deliver promptly to the Company an amount equal to the aggregate exercise price, or (D) subject to any conditions or limitations established by the Committee, the Company’s withholding of Shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of an Option pursuant to a “net exercise” arrangement (it being understood that, solely for purposes of determining the number of treasury shares held by the Company, the Shares so withheld will not be treated as issued and acquired by the Company upon such exercise), or (E) by a combination of the foregoing, or (F) by such other methods as may be approved by the Committee,
provided
that the combined value of all cash and cash equivalents and the Fair Market Value of any such Shares so tendered to the Company or withheld as of the date of such tender or withholding is at least equal to such aggregate exercise price.
(ii)
Wherever in this Plan or any Award Agreement a Participant is permitted to pay the exercise price of an Option or taxes relating to the exercise of an Option by delivering Shares, the Participant may, subject to procedures satisfactory to the Committee, satisfy such delivery requirement by presenting proof of beneficial ownership of such Shares, in which case the Company shall treat the Option as exercised without further payment and shall withhold such number of Shares from the Shares acquired by the exercise of the Option.
Section 7.
Stock Appreciation Rights
.
(a)
Grant
. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole authority to determine the Participants to whom Stock Appreciation Rights shall be granted, the number of Shares to be covered by each Stock Appreciation Right Award, the grant price thereof and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise thereof. Stock Appreciation Rights with a grant price equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value per Share as of the date of grant are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. In the sole discretion of the Committee, Stock Appreciation Rights may, but need not, qualify as performance-based compensation in accordance with Section 11 hereof. Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted in tandem with another Award, in addition to another Award, or freestanding and unrelated to another Award. Stock Appreciation Rights granted in tandem with or in addition to an Award may be granted either before, at the same time as the Award or at a later time. No Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable more than ten years from the date of grant.
(b)
Exercise and Payment
. A Stock Appreciation Right shall entitle the Participant to receive an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right over the grant price thereof (which grant price (except with respect to Substitute Awards) shall not be less than the Fair Market Value on the date of grant). The Committee shall determine in its sole discretion whether a Stock Appreciation Right shall be settled in cash, Shares or a combination of cash and Shares.
(c)
Other Terms and Conditions
. Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable Award Agreement, the Committee shall determine, at the grant of a Stock Appreciation Right, the term, methods of exercise, methods and form of settlement, and any other terms and conditions of any Stock Appreciation Right. The Committee may impose such conditions or restrictions on the exercise of any Stock Appreciation Right as it shall deem appropriate.
Section 8.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
.
(a)
Grant
. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole authority to determine the Participants to whom Shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be granted, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock and/or the number of Restricted Stock Units to be granted to each Participant, the duration of the period during which, and the conditions, if any, under which, the Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units may be forfeited to the Company, and the other terms and conditions of such Awards.
(b)
Transfer Restrictions
. Shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, except, in the case of Restricted Stock, as provided in the Plan or the applicable Award Agreements. Unless otherwise directed by the Committee, (i) certificates issued in respect of Shares of Restricted Stock shall be registered in the name of the Participant and deposited by such Participant, together with a stock power endorsed in blank, with the Company, or (ii) Shares of Restricted Stock shall be held at the Company’s transfer agent in book entry form with appropriate restrictions relating to the transfer of such Shares of Restricted Stock. Upon the lapse of the restrictions applicable to such Shares of Restricted Stock, the Company shall, as applicable, either deliver such certificates to the Participant or the Participant’s legal representative or the transfer agent shall remove the restrictions relating to the transfer of such Shares.
79
(c)
Payment
. Each Restricted Stock Unit shall have a value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share. Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in cash, Shares, other securities or other property, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, upon or after the lapse of the restrictions applicable thereto, or otherwise in accordance with the applicable Award Agreement. Dividends paid on any Shares of Restricted Stock or dividend equivalents paid on any Restricted Stock Units shall be paid directly to the Participant, withheld by the Company subject to vesting of the Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units, as applicable, pursuant to the terms of the applicable Award Agreement, or may be reinvested in additional Shares of Restricted Stock or in additional Restricted Stock Units, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
Section 9.
Performance Awards
.
(a)
Grant
. The Committee shall have sole authority to determine the Participants who shall receive a “Performance Award”, which shall consist of a right which is (i) denominated in cash or Shares, (ii) valued, as determined by the Committee, in accordance with the achievement of such Performance Goals during such Performance Periods as the Committee shall establish, and (iii) payable at such time and in such form as the Committee shall determine.
(b)
Terms and Conditions
. Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable Award Agreement, the Committee shall determine the Performance Goals to be achieved during any Performance Period, the length of any Performance Period, the amount of any Performance Award and the amount and kind of any payment or transfer to be made pursuant to any Performance Award.
(c)
Payment of Performance Awards
. Performance Awards may be paid in a lump sum or in installments following the close of the Performance Period as set forth in the Award Agreement on the date of grant.
Section 10.
Other Stock-Based Awards
.
The Committee shall have authority to grant to Participants an “Other Stock-Based Award”, which shall consist of any right which is (i) not an Award described in Sections 6 through 9 above and (ii) an Award of Shares or an Award denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, Shares (including, without limitation, securities convertible into Shares), as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan; provided that any such rights must comply, to the extent deemed desirable by the Committee, with Rule 16b-3 and applicable law. Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable Award Agreement, the Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of any such Other Stock-Based Award, including the price, if any, at which securities may be purchased pursuant to any Other Stock-Based Award granted under this Plan.
Section 11.
Performance Compensation Awards
.
(a)
General
. The Committee shall have the authority, at the time of grant of any Award described in Sections 6 through 10 (other than Options and Stock Appreciation Rights), to designate such Award as a Performance Compensation Award in order to qualify such Award as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code.
(b)
Eligibility
. The Committee will, in its sole discretion, designate which Participants will be eligible to receive Performance Compensation Awards in respect of such Performance Period. Designation of a Participant eligible to receive an Award hereunder for a Performance Period shall not in any manner entitle the Participant to receive payment in respect of any Performance Compensation Award for such Performance Period. The determination as to whether or not such Participant becomes entitled to payment in respect of any Performance Compensation Award shall be decided solely in accordance with the provisions of this Section 11. Moreover, designation of a Participant eligible to receive an Award hereunder for a particular Performance Period shall not require designation of such Participant eligible to receive an Award hereunder in any subsequent Performance Period and designation of one person as a Participant eligible to receive an Award hereunder shall not require designation of any other person as a Participant eligible to receive an Award hereunder in such period or in any other period.
(c)
Discretion of Committee with Respect to Performance Compensation Awards
. With regard to a particular Performance Period, the Committee shall have full discretion to select the applicable Participants, the length of such Performance Period, the type(s) of Performance Compensation Awards to be issued, the Performance Criteria that will be used to establish the Performance Goal(s), the kind or level of each Performance Goal to apply to the Company, and the Performance Formula, as applicable. Within the first 90 days of a Performance Period (or, if shorter, within the maximum period allowed under Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee shall, with regard to the Performance Compensation Awards to be issued for such Performance Period, exercise its discretion with respect to each of the matters enumerated in the immediately preceding sentence of this Section 11(c) and record the same in writing.
80
(d)
Payment of Performance Compensation Awards
.
(i)
Condition to Receipt of Payment. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, a Participant must be employed by the Company on the last day of a Performance Period to be eligible for payment in respect of a Performance Compensation Award for such Performance Period.
(ii)
Limitation. A Participant shall be eligible to receive payment in respect of a Performance Compensation Award only to the extent that: (1) the Performance Goals for such period are achieved; and (2) the Performance Formula as applied against such Performance Goals determines that all or some portion of such Participant’s Performance Award has been earned for the Performance Period.
(iii)
Certification. Following the completion of a Performance Period, the Committee shall review and certify in writing whether, and to what extent, the Performance Goals for the Performance Period have been achieved and, if so, to calculate and certify in writing that amount of the Performance Compensation Awards earned for the Performance Period based upon the Performance Formula.
(iv)
Negative Discretion. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, in determining the final payout of an individual Performance Compensation Award for a Performance Period, the Committee may reduce or eliminate the amount of the Performance Compensation Award earned under the Performance Formula in the Performance Period through the use of Negative Discretion if, in its sole judgment, such reduction or elimination is appropriate.
(v)
Timing of Award Payments. Unless otherwise set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, the Awards granted for a Performance Period shall be paid to Participants as soon as administratively possible following completion of the certifications required by this Section 11;
provided,
that, unless otherwise set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, in no event shall any Award granted for a Performance Period be paid later than the 15th calendar day of the third month following the end of the Participant’s first taxable year in which the right to payment is no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) or the 15th calendar day of the third month following the end of the Company’s first taxable year in which the payment is no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture”.
(vi)
Maximum Award Payable. Notwithstanding any provision contained in the Plan to the contrary, the maximum Performance Compensation Award payable to any one Participant under the Plan for any fiscal year in respect of a Performance Period is 2,000,000 Shares or, in the event the Performance Compensation Award is paid in cash, the equivalent cash value thereof on the first day of the Performance Period to which such Performance Compensation Award relates. Furthermore, any Performance Compensation Award that has been deferred shall not (between the date as of which the Performance Compensation Award is deferred and the payment date) increase (i) with respect to Performance Compensation Award that is payable in cash, by a measuring factor for each fiscal year greater than a reasonable rate of interest set by the Committee or (ii) with respect to a Performance Compensation Award that is payable in Shares, by an amount greater than the appreciation of a Share from the date such Performance Compensation Award is deferred to the payment date.
Section 12.
Amendment and Termination
.
(a)
Amendments to the Plan
. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time;
provided
that if an amendment to the Plan (i) would materially increase the benefits accruing to Participants under the Plan, (ii) would materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under the Plan, (iii) would materially modify the requirements for participation in the Plan or (iv) must otherwise be approved by the stockholders of the Company in order to comply with applicable law or the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or, if the Shares are not traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market, the principal national securities exchange upon which the Shares are traded or quoted, such amendment will be subject to stockholder approval and will not be effective unless and until such approval has been obtained; and
provided,
further
, that any such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance or termination that would impair the rights of any Participant or any holder or beneficiary of any Award previously granted shall not be effective as to such Participant without the written consent of the affected Participant, holder or beneficiary.
(b)
Amendments to Awards
. The Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, amend any terms of, or alter, suspend, discontinue, cancel or terminate, any Award theretofore granted;
provided
that any such waiver, amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance, cancellation or termination that would impair the rights of any Participant or any holder or beneficiary of any Award previously granted shall not be effective as to such Participant without the written consent of the affected Participant, holder or beneficiary.
81
(c)
Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events
. The Committee is hereby authorized to make equitable adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, all outstanding Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4(b) hereof) affecting the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, or the financial statements of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, or of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan.
(d)
Repricing
. Except in connection with a corporate transaction or event described in Section 4(b) hereof, the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of Options or the grant price of Stock Appreciation Rights, or cancel Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with an exercise price or grant price, as applicable, that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or grant price of the original Stock Appreciation Rights, as applicable, without stockholder approval. This Section 12(d) is intended to prohibit the repricing of “underwater” Options and Stock Appreciation Rights and will not be construed to prohibit the adjustments provided for in Section 4(b) of this Plan.
Section 13.
Change in Control
.
(a)
Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement or by the Committee at the date of grant, to the extent outstanding Awards granted under this Plan are not assumed, converted or replaced by the resulting or continuing entity in the event of a Change in Control, all outstanding Awards that may be exercised shall become fully exercisable, all restrictions with respect to outstanding Awards shall lapse and such Awards shall become vested and non-forfeitable, and any specified Performance Goals with respect to outstanding Awards shall be deemed to be satisfied at target immediately prior to the consummation of a Change in Control.
(b)
Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement or by the Committee at the date of grant or thereafter, to the extent outstanding Awards granted under this Plan are assumed, converted or replaced by the resulting or continuing entity in the event of a Change in Control, (i) any outstanding Awards that are subject to Performance Goals shall be converted, assumed or replaced by the resulting or continuing entity as if target performance had been achieved as of the date of the Change in Control, (ii) each Performance Award or Performance Compensation Award with service requirements shall continue to vest with respect to such requirements during the remaining period set forth in the Award Agreement, and (iii) all other Awards shall continue to vest (and/or the restrictions thereon shall continue to lapse) during the remaining period set forth in the Award Agreement.
(c)
Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement or by the Committee at the date of grant, to the extent outstanding Awards granted under this Plan are either assumed, converted or replaced by the resulting or continuing entity in the event of a Change in Control, if a Participant’s employment or service is terminated without Cause by the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company or a Participant terminates his or her employment or service with the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company for Good Reason, in either case, during the two year period following a Change in Control, all outstanding Awards held by the Participant that may be exercised shall become fully exercisable and all restrictions with respect to outstanding Awards shall lapse and become vested and non-forfeitable.
(d)
Notwithstanding anything in this Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, to the extent any provision of this Plan or an Award Agreement would cause a payment of deferred compensation that is subject to Section 409A of the Code to be made upon the occurrence of (i) a Change in Control, then such payment shall not be made unless such Change in Control also constitutes a “change in ownership”, “change in effective control” or “change in ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code or (ii) a termination of employment or service, then such payment shall not be made unless such termination of employment or service also constitutes a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. Any payment that would have been made except for the application of the preceding sentence shall be made in accordance with the payment schedule that would have applied in the absence of a Change in Control or termination of employment or service, but disregarding any future service or performance requirements.
Section 14.
General Provisions
.
(a)
Nontransferability
.
(i)
Each Award, and each right under any Award, shall be exercisable only by the Participant during the Participant’s lifetime, or, if permissible under applicable law, by the Participant’s legal guardian or representative.
82
(ii)
No Award may be sold, assigned, alienated, pledged, attached or otherwise transferred or encumbered by a Participant otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and any such purported sale, assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, transfer or encumbrance shall be void and unenforceable against the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company;
provided
that the designation of a beneficiary shall not constitute a sale, assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, transfer or encumbrance.
(iii)
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in the applicable Award Agreement evidencing an Option granted under the Plan or at any time thereafter in an amendment to an Award Agreement, provide that Options which are not intended to qualify as Incentive Options may be transferred by the Participant to whom such Option was granted (the “Grantee”) without consideration, after such time as all vesting conditions with respect to such Option have been satisfied, and subject to such rules as the Committee may adopt to preserve the purposes of the Plan, to: (1) the Grantee’s spouse, children or grandchildren (including adopted and stepchildren and grandchildren) (collectively, the “Immediate Family”); (2) a trust solely for the benefit of the Grantee and his or her Immediate Family; or (3) a partnership, corporation or limited liability company whose only partners, members or stockholders are the Grantee and his or her Immediate Family; (each transferee described in clauses (1), (2) and (3) above is hereinafter referred to as a “Permitted Transferee”);
provided
that the Grantee gives the Committee advance written notice describing the terms and conditions of the proposed transfer and the Committee notifies the Grantee in writing that such a transfer would comply with the requirements of the Plan and any applicable Award Agreement evidencing the Option.
The terms of any Option transferred in accordance with the immediately preceding sentence shall apply to the Permitted Transferee and any reference in the Plan or in an Award Agreement to an optionee, Grantee or Participant shall be deemed to refer to the Permitted Transferee, except that (a) Permitted Transferees shall not be entitled to transfer any Options, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution; (b) Permitted Transferees shall not be entitled to exercise any transferred Options unless there shall be in effect a registration statement on an appropriate form covering the Shares to be acquired pursuant to the exercise of such Option if the Committee determines that such a registration statement is necessary or appropriate, (c) the Committee or the Company shall not be required to provide any notice to a Permitted Transferee, whether or not such notice is or would otherwise have been required to be given to the Grantee under the Plan or otherwise and (d) the consequences of termination of the Grantee’s employment by, or services to, the Company under the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement shall continue to be applied with respect to the Grantee, following which the Options shall be exercisable by the Permitted Transferee only to the extent, and for the periods, specified in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.
(iv)
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, only gratuitous transfers of Awards shall be permitted. In no event may any Award granted under this Plan be transferred for value.
(b)
Dividend Equivalents
. In the sole discretion of the Committee, an Award (other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights), whether made as an Other Stock-Based Award described in Section 10 or as an Award granted pursuant to Sections 6 through 9 hereof, may provide the Participant with dividends or dividend equivalents, payable in cash, Shares, other securities or other property on a current or deferred basis;
provided,
that in the case of Awards with respect to which any applicable Performance Criteria have not been achieved, dividend equivalents may be paid only on a deferred basis, to the extent the underlying Award vests.
(c)
No Rights to Awards
. No Participant or other Person shall have any claim to be granted any Award, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of Participants, or holders or beneficiaries of Awards. The terms and conditions of Awards and the Committee’s determinations and interpretations with respect thereto need not be the same with respect to each Participant (whether or not such Participants are similarly situated).
(d)
Share Certificates
. Shares or other securities of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award or the exercise thereof shall be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the Plan or the rules, regulations, and other requirements of the SEC, any stock exchange upon which such Shares or other securities are then listed, and any applicable Federal or state laws, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.
(e)
Withholding
.
(i)
A Participant may be required to pay to the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, subject to Section 409A of the Code, and the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company shall have the right and is hereby authorized to withhold from any Award, from any payment due or transfer made under any Award or under the Plan, or
83
from any compensation or other amount owing to a Participant the amount (in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards or other property) of any applicable withholding taxes in respect of an Award, its exercise, or any payment or transfer under an Award or under the Plan, and to take such other action as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for the payment of such taxes.
(ii)
Without limiting the generality of clause (i) above, subject to the Company’s consent, a Participant may satisfy, in whole or in part, the foregoing withholding liability by delivery of Shares owned by the Participant (which are not subject to any pledge or other security interest and which have been owned by the Participant for at least six months) with a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability or by having the Company withhold from the number of Shares otherwise deliverable to the Participant with respect to an Award a number of Shares with a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability.
(iii)
Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, in connection with the transfer of an Option to a Permitted Transferee pursuant to Section 14(a), the Grantee shall remain liable for any withholding taxes required to be withheld upon the exercise of such Option by the Permitted Transferee.
(f)
Detrimental Activity and Recapture
. Any Award Agreement may provide for the cancellation or forfeiture of an Award or the forfeiture and repayment to the Company of any gain related to an Award, or other provisions intended to have a similar effect, upon such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee from time to time, if a Participant during employment or other service with the Company or a subsidiary, shall engage in activity detrimental to the Company. In addition, notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, any Award Agreement may also provide for the cancellation or forfeiture of an Award or the forfeiture and repayment to the Company of any gain related to an Award, or other provision intended to have a similar effect, upon such terms and conditions as may be required by the Committee under Section 10D of the Exchange Act and any applicable rules or regulations promulgated by the SEC or any national securities exchange or national securities association on which the Shares may be traded.
(g)
Award Agreements
. Each Award hereunder shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement which shall be delivered to the Participant and shall specify the terms and conditions of the Award and any rules applicable thereto, including but not limited to, the effect on such Award of the death, disability or termination of employment or service of a Participant and the effect, if any, of such other events as may be determined by the Committee.
(h)
No Limit on Other Compensation Arrangements
. Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company from adopting or continuing in effect other compensation arrangements, which may, but need not, provide for the grant of options, restricted stock, Shares and other types of Awards provided for hereunder (subject to stockholder approval if such approval is required), and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.
(i)
No Right to Employment
. The grant of an Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to be retained in the employ of, or in any consulting relationship to, or as a director on the Board or board of directors, as applicable, of, the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company. Further, the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company may at any time dismiss a Participant from employment or discontinue any consulting relationship, free from any liability or any claim under the Plan, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, any Award Agreement or any applicable employment contract or agreement.
(j)
No Rights as Stockholder
. Subject to the provisions of the applicable Award, no Participant or holder or beneficiary of any Award shall have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares to be distributed under the Plan until he or she has become the holder of such Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with each grant of Restricted Stock hereunder, the applicable Award shall specify if and to what extent the Participant shall not be entitled to the rights of a stockholder in respect of such Restricted Stock.
(k)
Governing Law
. Unless otherwise provided for in an applicable Award Agreement, the validity, construction, and effect of the Plan and any rules and regulations relating to the Plan and any Award Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, applied without giving effect to its conflict of laws principles.
(l)
Severability
. If any provision of the Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction or as to any Person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to the applicable laws, or if it cannot be construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction, Person or Award and the remainder of the Plan and any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.
84
(m)
Other Laws
. The Committee may refuse to issue or transfer any Shares or other consideration under an Award if, acting in its sole discretion, it determines that the issuance or transfer of such Shares or such other consideration might violate any applicable law or regulation or result in any liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, and any payment tendered to the Company by a Participant, other holder or beneficiary in connection with the exercise of such Award shall be promptly refunded to the relevant Participant, holder or beneficiary. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no Award granted hereunder shall be construed as an offer to sell securities of the Company, and no such offer shall be outstanding, unless and until the Committee in its sole discretion has determined that any such offer, if made, would be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the U.S. federal securities laws.
(n)
Foreign Employees
.
In order to facilitate the making of any Award or combination of Awards under this Plan, the Committee may provide for such special terms for awards to Participants who are foreign nationals or who are employed by the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company outside of the United States of America as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to or amendments, restatements or alternative versions of this Plan (including, without limitation, sub-plans) as it may consider necessary or appropriate for such purposes, without thereby affecting the terms of this Plan as in effect for any other purpose, and the Secretary or other appropriate officer of the Company may certify any such document as having been approved and adopted in the same manner as this Plan. No such special terms, supplements, amendments or restatements, however, shall include any provisions that are inconsistent with the terms of this Plan as then in effect unless this Plan could have been amended to eliminate such inconsistency without further approval by the stockholders of the Company.
(o)
No Trust or Fund Created
. Neither the Plan nor any Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company and a Participant or any other Person. To the extent that any Person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company pursuant to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company.
(p)
No Fractional Shares
. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award, and the Committee shall determine whether cash, other securities, or other property shall be paid or transferred in lieu of any fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be canceled, terminated, or otherwise eliminated.
(q)
Deferrals
. In the event the Committee permits a Participant to defer any Award payable in the form of cash, all such elective deferrals shall be accomplished by the delivery of a written, irrevocable election by the Participant on a form provided by the Company. All deferrals shall be made in accordance with administrative guidelines established by the Committee to ensure that such deferrals comply with all applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
(r)
Headings
. Headings are given to the Sections and subsections of the Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings shall not be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction or interpretation of the Plan or any provision thereof.
Section 15.
Compliance with Section 409A of the Code.
(a)
To the extent applicable, it is intended that this Plan and any grants made hereunder comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, so that the income inclusion provisions of Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code do not apply to the Participants. This Plan and any grants made hereunder shall be administered in a manner consistent with this intent. Any reference in this Plan to Section 409A of the Code will also include any regulations or any other formal guidance promulgated with respect to such Section by the U.S. Department of Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service. In any case, a Participant shall be solely responsible and liable for the satisfaction of all taxes and penalties that may be imposed on a Participant or for a Participant’s account in connection with this Plan and grants hereunder (including any taxes and penalties under Section 409A of the Code), and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall have any obligation to indemnify or otherwise hold a Participant harmless from any or all of such taxes or penalties.
(b)
Neither a Participant nor any of a Participant’s creditors or beneficiaries shall have the right to subject any deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A of Code) payable under this Plan and grants hereunder to any anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, attachment or garnishment. Except as permitted under Section 409A of the Code, any deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) payable to a Participant or for a Participant’s benefit under this Plan and grants hereunder may not be reduced by, or offset against, any amount owing by a Participant to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
85
(c)
If, at the time of a Participant’s separation from service (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code), (i) the Participant shall be a specified employee (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and using the identification methodology selected by the Company from time to time) and (ii) the Company shall make a good faith determination that an amount payable hereunder constitutes deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) the payment of which is required to be delayed pursuant to the six-month delay rule set forth in Section 409A of the Code in order to avoid taxes or penalties under Section 409A of the Code, then the Company shall not pay such amount on the otherwise scheduled payment date but shall instead pay it, without interest, on the earlier of the first business day of the seventh month following separation from service or death.
Section 16.
Term of the Plan.
(a)
Effective Date
. The Plan shall be effective as of the date of its approval by the Board (the “Effective Date”), subject to approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company.
(b)
Expiration Date
. No grant will be made under this Plan more than ten years after the Effective Date, but all grants made on or prior to such date will continue in effect thereafter subject to the terms thereof and of this Plan.
86
APPENDIX B
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") section of this proxy statement contains non-GAAP financial measures. The tables below reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures in the CD&A to the most directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP").
The presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. In addition, non-GAAP financial measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP.
|
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended January 31, 2015
|
|||
|
Table of Reconciliation from GAAP Revenue to Non-GAAP Revenue
|
||||
|
GAAP Revenue
|
$
|
1,128,436
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments related to acquisitions
|
29,727
|
|
||
|
Non-GAAP Revenue
|
$
|
1,158,163
|
|
|
|
Table of Reconciliation from GAAP Operating Income to Non-GAAP Operating Income
|
||||
|
GAAP operating income
|
$
|
79,111
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments related to acquisitions
|
29,727
|
|
||
|
Amortization of acquired technology and backlog
|
31,004
|
|
||
|
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets
|
45,163
|
|
||
|
Stock-based compensation expenses
|
54,458
|
|
||
|
M&A and other adjustments
|
23,440
|
|
||
|
Non-GAAP operating income
|
$
|
262,903
|
|
|
|
Table of Reconciliation from GAAP Cash Flow from Operating Activities to Non-GAAP Cash Flow from Operating Activities
|
||||
|
GAAP cash flow from operating activities
|
$
|
193,725
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense paid
|
28,800
|
|
||
|
Non-recurring payments (primarily cash paid for transaction costs associated with business acquisitions)
|
17,200
|
|
||
|
Income tax refunds received
|
(4,600
|
)
|
||
|
Other non-recurring cash inflows
|
(8,300
|
)
|
||
|
Non-GAAP cash flow from operating activities
|
$
|
226,825
|
|
|
87
DIRECTIONS TO 2015 ANNUAL MEETING LOCATION
Hilton Garden Inn
1575 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, New York, USA 11803
Tel: 1-516-755-5552 Fax: 1-516-755-5592
Traveling from the East:
Take the Long Island Expressway (I-495) to Round Swamp Road (Exit 48). Proceed down the exit ramp to traffic light. Turn left onto Round Swamp Road and continue under the expressway to the traffic light. Continue straight after light. The hotel entrance is the second left.
Traveling from the West:
Take the Long Island Expressway (I-495) to Round Swamp Road (Exit 48). Proceed down the exit ramp to traffic light. Turn right onto Round Swamp Road. The hotel entrance is the second left.
FORM OF PROXY CARD
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETINGPROPOSAL NO. 1PROPOSAL NO. 2PROPOSAL NO. 3PROPOSAL NO. 4OTHER MATTERSCORPORATE GOVERNANCEEXECUTIVE OFFICERSEXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONDIRECTOR COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTSECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCECERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONSAUDIT MATTERSREPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEESTOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETINGSOLICITATION OF PROXIESANNUAL REPORTAPPENDIX A - VERINT SYSTEMS INC. 2015 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLANAPPENDIX B - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESDIRECTIONS TO MEETINGFORM OF PROXY CARD