WELL 10-K Annual Report Dec. 31, 2012 | Alphaminr

WELL 10-K Fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2012

WELLTOWER INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
10-Q
10-Q
10-Q
10-K
PROXIES
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
DEF 14A
10-K 1 10K.htm 10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

Commission File No. 1-8923

hcreit_logo_k_sm

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

34-1096634

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio

43615

(Address of principal executive office)

(Zip Code)

(419) 247-2800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $1.00 par value

New York Stock Exchange

6.50% Series I Cumulative

Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value

New York Stock Exchange

6.50% Series J Cumulative

Redeemable Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the shares of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing sales price of such shares on the New York Stock Exchange as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $12,459,634,449.

As of January 31, 2013, the registrant had 260,433,734 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the annual stockholders’ meeting to be held May 2, 2013, are incorporated by reference into Part III.


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

2012 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I

Item 1.

Business

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

26

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

35

Item 2.

Properties

36

Item 3.

Item 4.

Legal Proceedings

Mine Safety Disclosures

38

38

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

39

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

41

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

42

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

70

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

71

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

106

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

106

Item 9B.

Other Information

107

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

108

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

108

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

108

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

108

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

108

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

109

3


PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Health Care REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that has been at the forefront of seniors housing and health care real estate since the company was founded in 1970.  We are an S&P 500 company headquartered in Toledo, Ohio. Our portfolio spans the full spectrum of seniors housing and health care real estate, including seniors housing communities, skilled nursing/post-acute facilities, medical office buildings, inpatient and outpatient medical centers and life science facilities. Our capital programs, when combined with comprehensive planning, development and property management services, make us a single-source solution for acquiring, planning, developing, managing, repositioning and monetizing real estate assets.  More information is available on the Internet at www.hcreit.com.

Our primary objectives are to protect stockholder capital and enhance stockholder value. We seek to pay consistent cash dividends to stockholders and create opportunities to increase dividend payments to stockholders as a result of annual increases in net operating income and portfolio growth. To meet these objectives, we invest across the full spectrum of seniors housing and health care real estate and diversify our investment portfolio by property type, customer and geographic location.

Depending upon the availability and cost of external capital, we believe our liquidity is sufficient to fund operations, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and complete construction projects in process. We also continuously evaluate opportunities to finance future investments. New investments are generally funded from temporary borrowings under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, internally generated cash and the proceeds from investment dispositions. Our investments generate cash from net operating income and principal payments on loans receivable. Permanent financing for future investments, which replaces funds drawn under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, has historically been provided through a combination of the issuance of public debt and equity securities and the incurrence or assumption of secured debt.

References herein to “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Health Care REIT, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless specifically noted otherwise.

Portfolio of Properties

Please see “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Executive Summary – Company Overview” for a table that summarizes our portfolio as of December 31, 2012.

Property Types

We invest in seniors housing and health care real estate and evaluate our business on three reportable segments: seniors housing triple-net, seniors housing operating, and medical facilities. For additional information regarding our segments, please see Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. The following is a summary of our various property types.

Seniors Housing Triple-Net

Our seniors housing triple-net properties include independent living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living facilities, Alzheimer’s/dementia facilities, skilled nursing/post-acute facilities and combinations thereof. We invest primarily through acquisitions and development. Our properties are primarily leased to operators under long-term, triple-net master leases. We are not involved in property management.  Our properties include stand-alone facilities that provide one level of service, combination facilities that provide multiple levels of service, and communities or campuses that provide a wide range of services.

Independent Living Facilities. Independent living facilities are age-restricted, multifamily properties with central dining facilities that provide residents access to meals and other services such as housekeeping, linen service, transportation and social and recreational activities.

Continuing Care Retirement Communities. Continuing care retirement communities typically include a combination of detached homes, an independent living facility, an assisted living facility and/or a skilled nursing facility on one campus. These communities appeal to residents because there is no need to relocate when health and medical needs change. Resident payment plans vary, but can

4


include entrance fees, condominium fees and rental fees. Many of these communities also charge monthly maintenance fees in exchange for a living unit, meals and some health services.

Assisted Living Facilities .  Assisted living facilities are state regulated rental properties that provide the same services as independent living facilities, but also provide supportive care from trained employees to residents who require assistance with activities of daily living, including, but not limited to, management of medications, bathing, dressing, toileting, ambulating and eating.

Alzheimer’s/Dementia Care Facilities. Certain assisted living facilities may include state licensed settings that specialize in caring for those afflicted with Alzheimer’s disease and/or other types of dementia.

Skilled Nursing/Post-Acute Facilities .  Skilled nursing/post-acute facilities are licensed daily rate or rental properties where the majority of individuals require 24-hour nursing and/or medical care. Generally, these properties are licensed for Medicaid and/or Medicare reimbursement.  All facilities offer some level of rehabilitation services.  Some facilities focus on higher acuity patients and offer rehabilitation units specializing in cardiac, orthopedic, dialysis, neurological or pulmonary rehabilitation.

Our seniors housing triple-net segment accounted for 41%, 46% and 60% of total revenues (including discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We lease 177 facilities to Genesis HealthCare, LLC pursuant to a long-term, triple-net master lease.  In addition to rent, the master lease requires Genesis to pay all operating costs, utilities, real estate taxes, insurance, building repairs, maintenance costs and all obligations under the ground leases.  All obligations under the master lease have been guaranteed by FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC.  For the year ended December 31, 2012, our lease with Genesis accounted for approximately 31% of our seniors housing triple-net segment revenues and 13% of our total revenues.

Seniors Housing Operating

Our seniors housing operating properties include the same facility types described in “Item 1 – Business – Property Types – Seniors Housing Triple-Net.”  Properties are primarily held in consolidated joint venture entities with operating partners. We utilize the structure proposed in the REIT Investment Diversification Act of 2007, which is commonly referred to as a “RIDEA” structure (the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code authorizing the RIDEA structure were enacted as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008).

Our seniors housing operating segment accounted for 37%, 32% and 7% of total revenues (including discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We have relationships with eight operators to own and operate 154 facilities (plus 39 facilities in an unconsolidated joint venture).  In each instance, our partner provides management services to the properties pursuant to an incentive-based management contract.  We rely on our partners to effectively and efficiently manage these properties.  Please see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding our acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. on January 9, 2013.  The following table provides information about our seniors housing operating concentration for the year ended December 31, 2012:

Partner % of Segment Revenues % of Total Revenues

Benchmark Senior Living, LLC                                                        32%                                                        12%

Merrill Gardens LLC                                                                           31%                                                        11%

Medical Facilities

Our medical facilities include medical office buildings, hospitals and life science facilities.  We typically lease our medical office buildings to multiple tenants and provide varying levels of property management. Our hospital investments are typically structured similar to our seniors housing triple-net investments.  Our life science investment represents an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture entity (see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements).  Our medical facilities segment accounted for 22%, 22% and 32% of total revenues (including discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  No single tenant exceeds 20% of segment revenues.

Medical Office Buildings .  The medical office building portfolio consists of health care related buildings that generally include physician offices, ambulatory surgery centers, diagnostic facilities, outpatient services and/or labs. Our portfolio has a strong affiliation with health systems. Approximately 92% of our medical office building portfolio is affiliated with health systems by having buildings on hospital campuses or serving as satellite locations for the health system and their physicians.

Hospitals .  Our hospitals generally include acute care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation hospitals, and long-term acute care hospitals. Acute care hospitals provide a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services, including, but not limited to, surgery,

5


rehabilitation, therapy and clinical laboratories. Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals provide inpatient services for patients with intensive rehabilitation needs. Long-term acute care hospitals provide inpatient services for patients with complex medical conditions that require more intensive care, monitoring or emergency support than is available in most skilled nursing facilities.

Life Science Facilities .  The life science portfolio consists of laboratory and office facilities specifically designed and constructed for use by biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies.  These facilities are located adjacent to The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which is a well-established market known for pharmaceutical and biotechnology research. They are similar to commercial office buildings with advanced HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning), electrical and mechanical systems.

Investments

Depending upon market conditions, we believe that new investments will be available in the future with spreads over our cost of capital that will generate appropriate returns to our stockholders.  We invest in seniors housing and health care real estate primarily through acquisitions, developments and joint venture partnerships. For additional information regarding acquisition and development activity, please see Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.  We diversify our investment portfolio by property type, customer and geographic location. In determining whether to invest in a property, we focus on the following: (1) the experience of the obligor’s/partner’s management team; (2) the historical and projected financial and operational performance of the property; (3) the credit of the obligor/partner; (4) the security for any lease or loan; (5) the real estate attributes of the building and its location; (6) the capital committed to the property by the obligor/partner; and (7) the operating fundamentals of the applicable industry. We conduct market research and analysis for all potential investments. In addition, we review the value of all properties, the interest rates and covenant requirements of any facility-level debt to be assumed at the time of the acquisition and the anticipated sources of repayment of any existing debt that is not to be assumed at the time of the acquisition.

We monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property. Our proactive and comprehensive asset management process for seniors housing properties generally includes review of monthly financial statements and other operating data for each property, review of obligor/partner creditworthiness, property inspections, and review of covenant compliance relating to licensure, real estate taxes, letters of credit and other collateral. Our internal property management division actively manages and monitors the medical office building portfolio with a comprehensive process including tenant relations, lease expirations, the mix of health service providers, hospital/health system relationships, property performance, capital improvement needs, and market conditions among other things. In monitoring our portfolio, our personnel use a proprietary database to collect and analyze property-specific data. Additionally, we conduct extensive research to ascertain industry trends.

We evaluate the operating environment in each property’s market to determine the likely trend in operating performance of the facility.  When we identify unacceptable trends, we seek to mitigate, eliminate or transfer the risk. Through these efforts, we are generally able to intervene at an early stage to address any negative trends, and in so doing, support both the collectability of revenue and the value of our investment.

Investment Types

Real Property. Our properties are primarily comprised of land, building, improvements and related rights.  Our hospitals and seniors housing triple-net properties are generally leased to operators under long-term operating leases.  The leases generally have a fixed contractual term of 12 to 15 years and contain one or more five to 15-year renewal options. Certain of our leases also contain purchase options.  Most of our rents are received under triple-net leases requiring the operator to pay rent and all additional charges incurred in the operation of the leased property. The tenants are required to repair, rebuild and maintain the leased properties. Substantially all of these operating leases are designed with escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.

At December 31, 2012, approximately 91% of our hospitals and seniors housing triple-net properties were subject to master leases. A master lease is a lease of multiple properties to one tenant entity under a single lease agreement. From time to time, we may acquire additional properties that are then leased to the tenant under the master lease. The tenant is required to make one monthly payment that represents rent on all the properties that are subject to the master lease. Typically, the master lease tenant can exercise its right to purchase the properties or to renew the master lease only with respect to all leased properties at the same time. This bundling feature benefits us because the tenant cannot limit the purchase or renewal to the better performing properties and terminate the leasing arrangement with respect to the poorer performing properties. This spreads our risk among the entire group of properties within the master lease. The bundling feature should provide a similar advantage if the master lease tenant is in bankruptcy. Subject to certain restrictions, a debtor in bankruptcy has the right to assume or reject each of its leases. It is our intent that a tenant in bankruptcy would be required to assume or reject the master lease as a whole, rather than deciding on a property by property basis.

6


Our medical office building portfolio is primarily self-managed and consists principally of multi-tenant properties leased to health care providers. Our leases have favorable lease terms that typically include increasers and some form of operating expense reimbursement by the tenant. As of December 31, 2012, 83% of our portfolio included leases with full pass through, 15% with a partial expense reimbursement (modified gross) and 2% with no expense reimbursement (gross). Our medical office building leases are non-cancellable operating leases that have a weighted-average remaining term of 8.0 years at December 31, 2012 and are often credit enhanced by guaranties and/or letters of credit.

Construction. We occasionally provide for the construction of properties for tenants as part of long-term operating leases. We capitalize certain interest costs associated with funds used for the construction of properties owned by us. The amount capitalized is based upon the amount advanced during the construction period using the rate of interest that approximates our company-wide cost of financing. Our interest expense is reduced by the amount capitalized. We also typically charge a transaction fee at the commencement of construction which we defer and amortize to income over the term of the resulting lease. The construction period commences upon funding and terminates upon the earlier of the completion of the applicable property or the end of a specified period. During the construction period, we advance funds to the tenants in accordance with agreed upon terms and conditions which require, among other things, periodic site visits by a Company representative. During the construction period, we generally require an additional credit enhancement in the form of payment and performance bonds and/or completion guaranties. At December 31, 2012, we had outstanding construction investments of $162,984,000 and were committed to provide additional funds of approximately $213,255,000 to complete construction for investment properties.

Real Estate Loans. Our real estate loans are typically structured to provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are generally secured by first/second mortgage liens, leasehold mortgages, corporate guaranties and/or personal guaranties. At December 31, 2012, we had outstanding real estate loans of $895,665,000. The interest yield averaged approximately 6.4% per annum on our outstanding real estate loan balances. Our yield on real estate loans depends upon a number of factors, including the stated interest rate, average principal amount outstanding during the term of the loan and any interest rate adjustments. The real estate loans outstanding at December 31, 2012 are generally subject to one to 15-year terms with principal amortization schedules and/or balloon payments of the outstanding principal balances at the end of the term. Typically, real estate loans are cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized with other real estate loans, operating leases or agreements between us and the obligor and its affiliates.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities .  Our investments in unconsolidated entities generally represent interests ranging from 10% to 50% in real estate assets.  Investments in less than majority owned entities where our interests represent a general partnership interest but substantive participating or kick-out rights have been granted to the limited partners, or where our interests do not represent the general partnership interest and we do not control the major operating and financial policies of the entity, are reported under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our consolidated results of operations. To the extent that our cost basis is different from the basis reflected at the entity level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the lives of the related assets and liabilities, and such amortization is included in our share of equity in earnings of the entity.  The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities is based on the amount paid to purchase the entity interest or the estimated fair value of the assets prior to the sale of interests in the entity. Other equity investments include an investment in available-for-sale securities. These equity investments represented a minimal ownership interest in these companies. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the equity method investment to its carrying value. When we determine a decline in the estimated fair value of such an investment below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded.  See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for more information.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint venture entities that we control, through voting rights or other means. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

At inception of the joint venture transactions, we identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of its operations. A VIE is broadly defined as an entity where either (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest, or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. We consolidate investments in VIEs when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary.  Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810, Consolidations , requires enterprises to perform a qualitative approach to determining whether or not a VIE will need to be consolidated on a continuous basis. This evaluation is based on an enterprise’s ability to direct and influence the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact that entity’s economic performance.

For investments in joint ventures, we evaluate the type of rights held by the limited partner(s), which may preclude consolidation in circumstances in which the sole general partner would otherwise consolidate the limited partnership. The assessment of limited

7


partners’ rights and their impact on the presumption of control over a limited partnership by the sole general partner should be made when an investor becomes the sole general partner and should be reassessed if (i) there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, (ii) the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership in the limited partnership interests, or (iii) there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We similarly evaluate the rights of managing members of limited liability companies.

Borrowing Policies

We utilize a combination of debt and equity to fund investments. Our debt and equity levels are determined by management to maintain a conservative credit profile. Generally, we intend to issue unsecured, fixed-rate public debt with long-term maturities to approximate the maturities on our leases and loans. For short-term purposes, we may borrow on our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement. We replace these borrowings with long-term capital such as senior unsecured notes, common stock or preferred stock. When terms are deemed favorable, we may invest in properties subject to existing mortgage indebtedness. In addition, we may obtain secured financing for unleveraged properties in which we have invested or may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis. In our agreements with our lenders, we are subject to restrictions with respect to secured and unsecured indebtedness.

Competition

We compete with other real estate investment trusts, real estate partnerships, private equity and hedge fund investors, banks, insurance companies, finance/investment companies, government-sponsored agencies, taxable and tax-exempt bond funds, health care operators, developers and other investors in the acquisition, development, leasing and financing of health care and seniors housing properties. We compete for investments based on a number of factors including investment structures, underwriting criteria and reputation. Our ability to successfully compete is impacted by economic and demographic trends, availability of acceptable investment opportunities, our ability to negotiate beneficial investment terms, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs and new and existing laws and regulations.

The operators/tenants of our properties compete on a local and regional basis with operators/tenants of properties that provide comparable services. Operators/tenants compete for patients and residents based on a number of factors including quality of care, reputation, physical appearance of properties, location, services offered, family preferences, physicians, staff and price. We also face competition from other health care facilities for tenants, such as physicians and other health care providers that provide comparable facilities and services.

For additional information on the risks associated with our business, please see “Item 1A — Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Employees As of January 31, 2013, we had 366 employees.

Customer Concentrations Please see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.

Geographic Concentrations Please see “Item 2 – Properties” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain Government Regulations

Health Law Matters — Generally

Typically, operators of seniors housing facilities do not receive significant funding from government programs and are largely subject to state laws, as opposed to federal laws. Operators of skilled nursing facilities and hospitals do receive significant funding from government programs, and these facilities are subject to the federal and state laws that regulate the type and quality of the medical and/or nursing care provided, ancillary services ( e.g., respiratory, occupational, physical and infusion therapies), qualifications of the administrative personnel and nursing staff, the adequacy of the physical plant and equipment, reimbursement and rate setting and operating policies.  In addition, as described below, operators of these facilities are subject to extensive laws and regulations pertaining to health care fraud and abuse, including, but not limited to, the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the Federal Stark Law, and the Federal False Claims Act, as well as comparable state law counterparts.  Hospitals, physician group practice clinics, and other health care providers that operate in our portfolio are subject to extensive federal, state, and local licensure, registration, certification, and inspection laws, regulations, and industry standards. Our tenants’ failure to comply with any of these, and other, laws could result in loss of accreditation; denial of reimbursement; imposition of fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state health care programs; loss of license; or closure of the facility.

Licensing and Certification

8


The primary regulations that affect seniors housing facilities with assisted living are state licensing and registration laws. In granting and renewing these licenses, the state regulatory agencies consider numerous factors relating to a property’s physical plant and operations, including, but not limited to, admission and discharge standards, staffing, and training. A decision to grant or renew a license is also affected by a property owner’s record with respect to patient and consumer rights, medication guidelines, and rules.  Certain of the seniors housing facilities mortgaged to or owned by us may require the resident to pay an entrance or upfront fee, a portion of which may be refundable.  These entrance fee communities are subject to significant state regulatory oversight, including, for example, oversight of each facility’s financial condition; establishment and monitoring of reserve requirements, and other financial restrictions; the right of residents to cancel their contracts within a specified period of time; lien rights in favor of residents; restrictions on change of ownership; and similar matters.  Such oversight, and the rights of residents within these entrance fee communities, may have an effect on the revenue or operations of the operators of such facilities, and, therefore, may adversely affect us.

Certain health care facilities are subject to a variety of licensure and certificate of need (“CON”) laws and regulations.  Where applicable, CON laws generally require, among other requirements, that a facility demonstrate the need for (1) constructing a new facility, (2) adding beds or expanding an existing facility, (3) investing in major capital equipment or adding new services, (4) changing the ownership or control of an existing licensed facility, or (5) terminating services that have been previously approved through the CON process.  Certain state CON laws and regulations may restrict the ability of operators to add new properties or expand an existing facility’s size or services. In addition, CON laws may constrain the ability of an operator to transfer responsibility for operating a particular facility to a new operator.  If we have to replace a property operator who is excluded from participating in a federal or state health care program (as discussed below), our ability to replace the operator may be affected by a particular state’s CON laws, regulations, and applicable guidance governing changes in provider control.

With respect to licensure, generally our skilled nursing facilities and acute care facilities are required to be licensed and certified for participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs.  This generally requires license renewals and compliance surveys on an annual or bi-annual basis. The failure of our operators to maintain or renew any required license or regulatory approval as well as the failure of our operators to correct serious deficiencies identified in a compliance survey could require those operators to discontinue operations at a property.  In addition, if a property is found to be out of compliance with Medicare, Medicaid, or other health care program conditions of participation, the property operator may be excluded from participating in those government health care programs.  Any such occurrence may impair an operator’s ability to meet their financial obligations to us.  If we have to replace an excluded-property operator, our ability to replace the operator may be affected by federal and state laws, regulations, and applicable guidance governing changes in provider control. This may result in payment delays, an inability to find a replacement operator, a significant working capital commitment from us to a new operator or other difficulties.

Reimbursement

Seniors Housing Facilities (excluding skilled nursing facilities). Approximately 58% of our overall revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012 were attributable to seniors housing facilities.  The majority of the revenues received by the operators of these facilities are from private pay sources. The remaining revenue source is primarily Medicaid under certain waiver programs. As a part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“OBRA”) of 1981, Congress established a waiver program enabling some states to offer Medicaid reimbursement to assisted living providers as an alternative to institutional long-term care services. The provisions of OBRA and the subsequent OBRA Acts of 1987 and 1990 permit states to seek a waiver from typical Medicaid requirements to develop cost-effective alternatives to long-term care, including Medicaid payments for assisted living and home health. As of December 31, 2012, ten of our 42 seniors housing operators received Medicaid reimbursement pursuant to Medicaid waiver programs. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, approximately 4% of the revenues at our seniors housing facilities were from Medicaid reimbursement. There can be no guarantee that a state Medicaid program operating pursuant to a waiver will be able to maintain its waiver status.

Rates paid by self-pay residents are set by the facilities and are determined by local market conditions and operating costs. Generally, facilities receive a higher payment per day for a private pay resident than for a Medicaid beneficiary who requires a comparable level of care. The level of Medicaid reimbursement varies from state to state.  Thus, the revenues generated by operators of our assisted living facilities may be adversely affected by payor mix, acuity level, changes in Medicaid eligibility, and reimbursement levels.  In addition, a state could lose its Medicaid waiver and no longer be permitted to utilize Medicaid dollars to reimburse for assisted living services. Changes in revenues could in turn have a material adverse effect on an operator’s ability to meet its obligations to us.

Skilled Nursing Facilities and Hospitals. Skilled nursing facilities and hospitals typically receive most of their revenues from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, with the balance representing reimbursement payments from private payors, including private

9


insurers.  Consequently, changes in federal or state reimbursement policies may also adversely affect an operator’s ability to cover its expenses, including our rent or debt service. Skilled nursing facilities and hospitals are subject to periodic pre- and post-payment reviews, and other audits by federal and state authorities.  A review or audit of a property operator’s claims could result in recoupments, denials, or delay of payments in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us.  Due to the significant judgments and estimates inherent in payor settlement accounting, no assurance can be given as to the adequacy of any reserves maintained by our property operators to cover potential adjustments to reimbursements, or to cover settlements made to payors.  In fact, in December 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) released a report focusing on skilled nursing facilities’ billing practices for Medicare Part A payments, and found that between 2006-2008 skilled nursing facilities increasingly billed for higher paying Resource Utilization Groups (“RUGs”), the payment classification mechanism for the Medicare program, even though beneficiary characteristics remained largely unchanged.  In particular, from 2006 to 2008, OIG found that the percentage of RUGs for ultra high therapy increased from 17% to 28%, despite the fact that beneficiaries’ ages and diagnoses at admission were largely unchanged during that time period. In November 2012, the OIG released a report focused on inappropriate payments to skilled nursing facilities, and found that of the 499 claims from 2009 that were reviewed in the study, skilled nursing facilities billed 25% of the claims in error and misreported information on the Minimum Data Set (“MDS”) for 47% of the claims.   Recent attention on skilled nursing billing practices and payments or ongoing government pressure to reduce spending by government health care programs, could result in lower payments to skilled nursing facilities and, as a result, may impair an operator’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us.

Medicare Reimbursement and Skilled Nursing Facilities. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, approximately 29% of the revenues at our skilled nursing facilities (which comprised 20% of our overall revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012) were paid by Medicare. Skilled nursing facilities are reimbursed under the Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (“SNF PPS”). There is a risk that some skilled nursing facilities’ costs will exceed the fixed payments under the SNF PPS, and there is also a risk that payments under the SNF PPS may be set below the costs to provide certain items and services, which could result in immediate financial difficulties for skilled nursing facilities, and could cause operators to seek bankruptcy protection. Skilled nursing facilities have faced these types of difficulties since the implementation of the SNF PPS.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), made a positive payment update for skilled nursing facilities for fiscal year 2013.  For fiscal year 2013, skilled nursing facilities received a 1.8% increase in RUG payments, resulting from a 2.5% market basket update less a 0.7% multi-factor productivity adjustment . In addition, on November 21, 2011, the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which was created by the Budget Control Act of 2011, concluded its work, and issued a statement that it was not able to make a bipartisan agreement, thus triggering the sequestration process.  On January 2, 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which delayed the sequestration process until March 2013.  The sequestration process, if triggered, will result in spending reductions, including Medicare cuts.  The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 also increased the multiple procedure discount for Part B therapy services from 25% to 50% effective April 2013.

In addition, Section 5008 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 directed the Secretary of HHS to conduct a Post Acute Care Payment Reform Demonstration (“PAC-PRD”) program, for a three year period, beginning January 1, 2008, to assess the costs and outcomes of patients discharged from hospitals in a variety of post-acute care settings, including skilled nursing facilities. The demonstration program’s results and recommendations were reported to Congress in a January 2012 report.  The results and recommendations could lead to future changes in Medicare coverage, reimbursement, and reporting requirements for post-acute care.

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 mandated caps on Medicare reimbursement for certain therapy services. However, Congress imposed various waivers on the implementation of those caps.  The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 made a number of changes, including, effective on October 1, 2012, applying the therapy caps to outpatient hospitals, creating two new threshold amounts of $3,700 (one for each therapy cap amount), and requiring a manual medical review process of claims over these new thresholds.  The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 also extended the waiver program related to therapy caps through the end of 2012.  These therapy caps may negatively impact payments to skilled nursing facilities.  However, members of MedPAC recently stated that they would prefer not to have hard caps, which indicates that the waiver program for therapy caps will likely continue.

If the waiver program expires, patients will need to use private funds to pay for the cost of therapy above the caps.  If patients are unable to satisfy their out-of-pocket cost responsibility to reimburse an operator for services rendered, the operator’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us could be adversely impacted.

Medicare Reimbursement and Hospitals. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, approximately 52% of the revenues at our hospitals (which comprised 5% of our overall revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012) were from Medicare reimbursements. Hospitals, generally, are reimbursed by Medicare under the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (“PPS”),

10


the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (“OPPS”), the Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System (“LTCH PPS”), or the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System (“IRF PPS”). Acute care hospitals provide a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services, including, but not limited to, surgery, rehabilitation, therapy, and clinical laboratory services. Long-term acute care hospitals provide inpatient services for patients with medical conditions that are often complex and that require more intensive care, monitoring or emergency support than that available in most skilled nursing facilities. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities provide intensive rehabilitation services in an inpatient setting for patients requiring at least three hours of rehabilitation services a day.

With respect to Medicare’s PPS for regular hospitals, reimbursement for inpatient services is made on the basis of a fixed, prospective rate, based on the principal diagnosis of the patient.  Hospitals may be at risk to the extent that their costs in treating a specific case exceed the fixed payment amount. The diagnosis related group (“DRG”) reimbursement system was updated in 2008 to expand the number of DRGs from 538 to 745 in order to better distinguish more severe conditions.   The addition of new DRGs raised the total number of DRGs to 751.   In some cases, a hospital might be able to qualify for an outlier payment if the hospital’s losses exceed a threshold.

On August 1, 2012, CMS published a final rule for the inpatient prospective payment system, which sets forth acute care and long-term care hospital payment rate changes for the 2013 fiscal year.  Specifically, CMS estimates that, for fiscal year 2013, the Medicare rates for inpatient stays at acute care hospitals will increase by 2.8% for those hospitals that successfully participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program, while those that do not successfully participate in that program would receive a payment rate increase of 0.8%.  CMS also implemented a 3.75% one-time budget neutrality adjustment to the long-term care hospital rate that would be phased in over three years.   The first year phase in of that adjustment will be 1.3%, which would apply to payments or discharges on or after December 29, 2012.  CMS adopted a one-year extension of the existing moratorium on the 25% threshold policy, through fiscal year 2013, beginning on or after October 1, 2012 and before October 1, 2013.  CMS clarified its regulations to reflect an existing policy that the Inpatient Prospective Payment System comparable per diem amount is capped at an amount comparable to what would have been a full payment under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System and that cap applies to short stay cases in long-term care hospitals with discharges occurring on or after December 29, 2012.  The legislative moratorium on new long-term hospitals and satellite facilities is set to expire at the end of 2012. Additionally, on July 30, 2012, CMS released notices updating the payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”).  For IRF discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2012 and on or before September 30, 2013, CMS is implementing a net 1.9% rate increase.

On November 1, 2012, CMS published the calendar year 2013 final rule with comment period for outpatient care hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers.  CMS estimates that the rates and policies in the final rule will increase payment rates for ambulatory surgery centers by 0.6%.

Medicare Reimbursement and Physicians. CMS annually adjusts the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payment rates based on an update formula that includes application of the Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”). On November 1, 2011, CMS published the calendar year 2012 Physician Fee Schedule final rule for a negative 27.4% update under the statutory SGR formula.  In February 2012, Congress passed the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, which blocked the cut through the end of 2012. On November 1, 2012, CMS published the calendar year 2013 Physician Fee Schedule final rule with comment period.  The final rule calls for a negative 26.5% update under the statutory SGR formula.  Congress has overridden the required reduction every year from 2003 through the end of 2012.  The final rule continues implementation of quality and cost measures that will be used in establishing a new value−based modifier that would adjust physician payments based on whether they are providing higher quality and more efficient care. The Health Reform Laws, as defined below, require CMS to begin making payment adjustments to certain physicians and physician groups on January 1, 2015, and to apply the modifier to all physicians by January 1, 2017. Calendar year 2013 is the initial performance year for purposes of adjusting payments in calendar year 2015.

Medicaid Reimbursement. Medicaid is a major payor source for residents in our skilled nursing facilities and hospitals. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, approximately 49% of the revenues of our skilled nursing facilities and 11% of the revenues of our hospitals were attributable to Medicaid reimbursement payments. The federal and state governments share responsibility for financing Medicaid. The federal matching rate, known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (“FMAP”), varies by state based on relative per capita income, but is at least 50% in all states. On average, Medicaid is the largest component of total state spending, representing approximately 23.7% of total state expenditures  in state fiscal year 2011. The percentage of Medicaid dollars used for long-term care varies from state to state, due in part to different ratios of elderly population and eligibility requirements. Within certain federal guidelines, states have a fairly wide range of discretion to determine eligibility and reimbursement methodology.  Many states reimburse long-term care facilities using fixed daily rates, which are applied prospectively based on patient acuity and the historical costs incurred in providing patient care. Reasonable costs typically include allowances for staffing, administrative and general expenses, property, and equipment ( e.g. , real estate taxes, depreciation and fair rental).

11


In most states, Medicaid does not fully reimburse the cost of providing skilled nursing services. Certain states are attempting to slow the rate of growth in Medicaid expenditures by freezing rates or restricting eligibility and benefits. Our skilled nursing portfolio’s average Medicaid rate will likely vary throughout the year as states continue to make interim changes to their budgets and Medicaid funding. In addition, Medicaid reimbursement rates may decline if revenues in a particular state are not sufficient to fund budgeted expenditures.  President Obama’s proposed fiscal year budget for 2013, released on February 13, 2012, includes a proposal to place new limits on state provider taxes that are used to pay the state share of Medicaid and has the potential to further impact Medicaid reimbursement rates.  The President’s budget includes a proposal to phase down the Medicaid provider tax, a tax paid by health care providers to help fund state Medicaid programs, beginning with a reduction from the current law level of 6.0% to 4.5% in fiscal year 2015.  The President’s budget also includes a proposal to replace the Federal matching rate for state Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program with a single matching rate specific to each state.

The Medicare Part D drug benefit became effective January 1, 2006. Since that date, low-income Medicare beneficiaries (eligible for both Medicare and full Medicaid benefits), including those nursing home residents who are dually eligible for both programs, may enroll and receive outpatient prescription drugs under Medicare, not Medicaid. Medicare Part D has resulted in increased administrative responsibilities for nursing home operators because enrollment in Medicare Part D is voluntary and residents must choose between multiple prescription drug plans.  Operators may also experience increased expenses to the extent that a particular drug prescribed to a patient is not listed on the Medicare Part D drug plan formulary for the plan in which the patient is enrolled.

The reimbursement methodologies applied to health care facilities continue to evolve.  Federal and state authorities have considered and may seek to implement new or modified reimbursement methodologies that may negatively impact health care property operations.  The impact of any such changes, if implemented, may result in a material adverse effect on our skilled nursing and hospital property operations. No assurance can be given that current revenue sources or levels will be maintained.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that payments under a government health care program are currently, or will be in the future, sufficient to fully reimburse the property operators for their operating and capital expenses.  As a result, an operator’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us could be adversely impacted.

Finally, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“PPACA”) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which amends the PPACA (collectively, the “Health Reform Laws”) (further discussed below) may have a significant impact on Medicare, Medicaid, other federal health care programs, and private insurers, which impact the reimbursement amounts received by skilled nursing facilities and other health care providers. The Health Reform Laws could have a substantial and material adverse effect on all parties directly or indirectly involved in the health care system.

Other Related Laws

Skilled nursing facilities and hospitals (and seniors housing facilities that receive Medicaid payments) are subject to federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and applicable guidance that govern the operations and financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by health care providers. Certain of these laws prohibit direct or indirect payments of any kind for the purpose of inducing or encouraging the referral of patients for medical products or services reimbursable by government health care programs. Other laws require providers to furnish only medically necessary services and submit to the government valid and accurate statements for each service. Still, other laws require providers to comply with a variety of safety, health and other requirements relating to the condition of the licensed property and the quality of care provided.  Sanctions for violations of these laws, regulations, and other applicable guidance may include, but are not limited to, criminal and/or civil penalties and fines, loss of licensure, immediate termination of government payments, and exclusion from any government health care program. In certain circumstances, violation of these rules (such as those prohibiting abusive and fraudulent behavior) with respect to one property may subject other facilities under common control or ownership to sanctions, including exclusion from participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, as well as other government health care programs.  In the ordinary course of its business, a property operator is regularly subjected to inquiries, investigations, and audits by the federal and state agencies that oversee these laws and regulations.

All health care providers, including, but not limited to skilled nursing facilities and hospitals (and seniors housing facilities that receive Medicaid payments) are also subject to the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which generally prohibits persons from offering, providing, soliciting, or receiving remuneration to induce either the referral of an individual or the furnishing of a good or service for which payment may be made under a federal health care program, such as Medicare or Medicaid. Skilled nursing facilities and hospitals are also subject to the Federal Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989, commonly referred to as the Stark Law. The Stark Law generally prohibits the submission of claims to Medicare for payment if the claim results from a physician referral for certain designated services and the physician has a financial relationship with the health service provider that does not qualify under one of the exceptions for a financial relationship under the Stark Law. Similar prohibitions on physician self-referrals and submission of claims apply to state Medicaid programs. Further, health care providers, including, but not limited to, skilled nursing facilities and hospitals (and seniors housing facilities that receive Medicaid payments), are subject to substantial financial penalties under the Civil

12


Monetary Penalties Act and the Federal False Claims Act and, in particular, actions under the Federal False Claims Act’s “whistleblower” provisions. Private enforcement of health care fraud has increased due in large part to amendments to the Federal False Claims Act that encourage private individuals to sue on behalf of the government. These whistleblower suits brought by private individuals, known as qui tam actions, may be filed by almost anyone, including present and former patients, nurses and other employees.  Such whistleblower actions have been brought against nursing facilities on the basis of the alleged failure of the nursing facility to meet applicable regulations relating to its operations.  Significantly, if a claim is successfully adjudicated, the Federal False Claims Act provides for treble damages up to $11,000 per claim.

Prosecutions, investigations, or whistleblower actions could have a material adverse effect on a property operator’s liquidity, financial condition, and operations, which could adversely affect the ability of the operator to meet its financial obligations to us.  Finally, various state false claim act and anti-kickback laws may also apply to each property operator. Violation of any of the foregoing statutes can result in criminal and/or civil penalties that could have a material adverse effect on the ability of an operator to meet its financial obligations to us.

Other legislative developments, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), have greatly expanded the definition of health care fraud and related offenses and broadened its scope to include private health care plans in addition to government payors. Congress also has greatly increased funding for the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services to audit, investigate and prosecute suspected health care fraud.  Moreover, a significant portion of the billions in health care fraud recoveries over the past several years has also been returned to government agencies to further fund their fraud investigation and prosecution efforts.

Additionally, other HIPAA provisions and regulations provide for communication of health information through standard electronic transaction formats and for the privacy and security of health information. In order to comply with the regulations, health care providers often must undertake significant operational and technical implementation efforts.  Operators also may face significant financial exposure if they fail to maintain the privacy and security of medical records and other personal health information about individuals. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) Act, passed in February 2009, strengthened the HHS Secretary’s authority to impose civil money penalties for HIPAA violations occurring after February 18, 2009. HITECH directs the HHS Secretary to provide for periodic audits to ensure covered entities and their business associates (as that term is defined under HIPAA) comply with the applicable HITECH requirements, increasing the likelihood that a HIPAA violation will result in an enforcement action. CMS issued an interim Final Rule which conformed HIPAA enforcement regulations to the HITECH Act, increasing the maximum penalty for multiple violations of a single requirement or prohibition to $1.5 million.  Higher penalties may accrue for violations of multiple requirements or prohibitions.  Additionally, on January 17, 2013, CMS released a final rule, which expands the applicability of HIPAA and HITECH and strengthens the government’s ability to enforce these laws.  The final rule broadens the definition of “business associate” and provides for civil money penalty liability against covered entities and business associates for the acts of their agents regardless of whether a business associate agreement is in place. Additionally, the final rule adopts certain changes to the HIPAA enforcement regulations to incorporate the increased and tiered civil monetary penalty structure provided by HITECH, and makes business associates of covered entities directly liable under HIPAA for compliance with certain of the HIPAA privacy standards and HIPAA security standards.  HIPAA violations are also potentially subject to criminal penalties.

In November 2002, CMS began an ongoing national Nursing Home Quality Initiative (“NHQI”). Under this initiative, historical survey information, the NHQI Pilot Evaluation Report and the NHQI Overview is made available to the public on-line. The NHQI website provides consumer and provider information regarding the quality of care in nursing homes. The data allows consumers, providers, states, and researchers to compare quality information that shows how well nursing homes are caring for their residents’ physical and clinical needs. The posted nursing home quality measures come from resident assessment data that nursing homes routinely collect on the residents at specified intervals during their stay. If the operators of nursing facilities are unable to achieve quality of care ratings that are comparable or superior to those of their competitors, they may lose market share to other facilities, reducing their revenues and adversely impacting their ability to make rental payments.

Finally, government investigations and enforcement actions brought against the health care industry have increased dramatically over the past several years and are expected to continue. Some of these enforcement actions represent novel legal theories and expansions in the application of the Federal False Claims Act. The costs for an operator of a health care property associated with both defending such enforcement actions and the undertakings in settling these actions can be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on the ability of an operator to meet its obligations to us.

Taxation

Federal Income Tax Considerations

13


The following summary of the taxation of the Company and the material federal tax consequences to the holders of our debt and equity securities is for general information only and is not tax advice. This summary does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to certain types of holders of stock or securities (including, but not limited to, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial institutions or broker-dealers, persons holding shares of common stock as part of a hedging, integrated conversion, or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, traders in securities that use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities, investors in pass-through entities and foreign corporations and persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States).

This summary does not discuss all of the aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to you in light of your particular investment or other circumstances. In addition, this summary does not discuss any state or local income taxation or foreign income taxation or other tax consequences. This summary is based on current U.S. federal income tax law. Subsequent developments in U.S. federal income tax law, including changes in law or differing interpretations, which may be applied retroactively, could have a material effect on the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our securities as set forth in this summary. Before you purchase our securities, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding the particular U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences of acquiring, owning and selling our securities.

General

We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) commencing with our first taxable year. We intend to continue to operate in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT, but there is no guarantee that we will qualify or remain qualified as a REIT for subsequent years. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet a variety of qualification tests imposed under federal income tax law with respect to income, assets, distribution level and diversity of share ownership as discussed below under “— Qualification as a REIT.” There can be no assurance that we will be owned and organized and will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified.

In any year in which we qualify as a REIT, in general, we will not be subject to federal income tax on that portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gain that is distributed to stockholders. We may, however, be subject to tax at normal corporate rates on any taxable income or capital gain not distributed. If we elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long-term capital gain, stockholders are required to include their proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain in income, but they will receive a refundable credit for their share of any taxes paid by us on such gain.

Despite the REIT election, we may be subject to federal income and excise tax as follows:

•     To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on the undistributed amount at regular corporate tax rates;

•     We may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” (the “AMT”) on certain tax preference items to the extent that the AMT exceeds our regular tax;

•     If we have net income from the sale or other disposition of “foreclosure property” that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, such income will be taxed at the highest corporate rate;

•     Any net income from prohibited transactions (which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than dispositions of foreclosure property and dispositions of property due to an involuntary conversion) will be subject to a 100% tax;

•     If we fail to satisfy either the 75% or 95% gross income tests (as discussed below), but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because certain other requirements are met, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (1) the gross income attributable to the greater of (i) 75% of our gross income over the amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 75% gross income test (discussed below) or (ii) 95% of our gross income over the amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income test (discussed below) multiplied by (2) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability;

•     If we fail to distribute during each year at least the sum of (1) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year, (2) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year (other than capital gain that we elect to retain and pay tax on) and (3) any undistributed taxable income from preceding periods, we will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over amounts actually distributed; and

14


•     We will be subject to a 100% tax on the amount of any rents from real property, deductions or excess interest paid to us by any of our “taxable REIT subsidiaries” that would be reduced through reallocation under certain federal income tax principles in order to more clearly reflect income of the taxable REIT subsidiary. See “— Qualification as a REIT — Investments in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.”

•     We may be subject to the corporate “alternative minimum tax” on any items of tax preference, including any deductions of net operating losses.

If we acquire any assets from a corporation, which is or has been a “C” corporation, in a carryover basis transaction, we could be liable for specified liabilities that are inherited from the “C” corporation. A “C” corporation is generally defined as a corporation that is required to pay full corporate level federal income tax. If we recognize gain on the disposition of the assets during the ten-year period beginning on the date on which the assets were acquired by us, then, to the extent of the assets’ “built-in gain” (i.e., the excess of the fair market value of the asset over the adjusted tax basis in the asset, in each case determined as of the beginning of the ten-year period), we will be subject to tax on the gain at the highest regular corporate rate applicable. The results described in this paragraph with respect to the recognition of built-in gain assume that the built-in gain assets, at the time the built-in gain assets were subject to a conversion transaction (either where a “C” corporation elected REIT status or a REIT acquired the assets from a “C” corporation), were not treated as sold to an unrelated party and gain recognized.  For those properties that are subject to the built-in-gains tax, if triggered by a sale within the ten-year period beginning on the date on which the properties were acquired by us, then the potential amount of built-in-gains tax will be an additional factor when considering a possible sale of the properties.  See Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the built-in gains tax.

Qualification as a REIT

A REIT is defined as a corporation, trust or association:

(1)     which is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

(2)     the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;

(3)     which would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the federal income tax law relating to REITs;

(4)     which is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company;

(5)     the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons in each taxable year of the REIT except for its first taxable year;

(6)     not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned during the last half of each taxable year, excluding its first taxable year, directly or indirectly, by or for five or fewer individuals (which includes certain entities) (the “Five or Fewer Requirement”); and

(7)     which meets certain income and asset tests described below.

Conditions (1) to (4), inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. For purposes of conditions (5) and (6), pension funds and certain other tax-exempt entities are treated as individuals, subject to a “look-through” exception in the case of condition (6).

Based on publicly available information, we believe we have satisfied the share ownership requirements set forth in (5) and (6) above. In addition, Article VI of our by-laws provides for restrictions regarding ownership and transfer of shares. These restrictions are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in (5) and (6) above. These restrictions, however, may not ensure that we will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in (5) and (6) above.

We have complied with, and will continue to comply with, regulatory rules to send annual letters to certain of our stockholders requesting information regarding the actual ownership of our stock. If, despite sending the annual letters, we do not know, or after exercising reasonable diligence would not have known, whether we failed to meet the Five or Fewer Requirement, we will be treated as having met the Five or Fewer Requirement. If we fail to comply with these regulatory rules, we will be subject to a monetary

15


penalty. If our failure to comply was due to intentional disregard of the requirement, the penalty would be increased. However, if our failure to comply were due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, no penalty would be imposed.

We may own a number of properties through wholly owned subsidiaries. A corporation will qualify as a “qualified REIT subsidiary” if 100% of its stock is owned by a REIT, and the REIT does not elect to treat the subsidiary as a taxable REIT subsidiary. A “qualified REIT subsidiary” will not be treated as a separate corporation, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deductions and credits of a “qualified REIT subsidiary” will be treated as assets, liabilities and items (as the case may be) of the REIT. A “qualified REIT subsidiary” is not subject to federal income tax, and our ownership of the voting stock of a qualified REIT subsidiary will not violate the restrictions against ownership of securities of any one issuer which constitute more than 10% of the value or total voting power of such issuer or more than 5% of the value of our total assets, as described below under “— Asset Tests.”

If we invest in a partnership, a limited liability company or a trust taxed as a partnership or as a disregarded entity, we will be deemed to own a proportionate share of the partnership’s, limited liability company’s or trust’s assets. Likewise, we will be treated as receiving our share of the income and loss of the partnership, limited liability company or trust, and the gross income will retain the same character in our hands as it has in the hands of the partnership, limited liability company or trust. These “look-through” rules apply for purposes of the income tests and assets tests described below.

Income Tests. There are two separate percentage tests relating to our sources of gross income that we must satisfy for each taxable year.

•     At least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from certain sales of property held primarily for sale) must be directly or indirectly derived each taxable year from “rents from real property,” other income from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or certain income from qualified temporary investments.

•     At least 95% of our gross income (excluding gross income from certain sales of property held primarily for sale) must be directly or indirectly derived each taxable year from any of the sources qualifying for the 75% gross income test and from dividends (including dividends from taxable REIT subsidiaries) and interest.

As to transactions entered into in taxable years beginning after October 22, 2004 and on or prior to July 30, 2008, any of our income from a “clearly identified” hedging transaction that is entered into by us in the normal course of business, directly or indirectly, to manage the risk of interest rate movements, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings or obligations incurred or to be incurred by us, or such other risks that are prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service, is excluded from the 95% gross income test.

For transactions entered into after July 30, 2008, any of our income from a “clearly identified” hedging transaction that is entered into by us in the normal course of business, directly or indirectly, to manage the risk of interest rate movements, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings or obligations incurred or to be incurred by us is excluded from the 95% and 75% gross income tests.

For transactions entered into after July 30, 2008, any of our income from a “clearly identified” hedging transaction entered into by us primarily to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that is included in gross income in the 95% and 75% gross income tests is excluded from the 95% and 75% gross income tests.

In general, a hedging transaction is “clearly identified” if (1) the transaction is identified as a hedging transaction before the end of the day on which it is entered into and (2) the items or risks being hedged are identified “substantially contemporaneously” with the hedging transaction. An identification is not substantially contemporaneous if it is made more than 35 days after entering into the hedging transaction.

As to gains and items of income recognized after July 30, 2008, “passive foreign exchange gain” for any taxable year will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income test and “real estate foreign exchange gain” for any taxable year will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Real estate foreign exchange gain is foreign currency gain (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 988(b)(1)) which is attributable to: (i) any qualifying item of income or gain for purposes of the 75% gross income test; (ii) the acquisition or ownership of obligations secured by mortgages on real property or interests in real property; or (iii) becoming or being the obligor under obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property. Real estate foreign exchange gain also includes Internal Revenue Code Section 987 gain attributable to a qualified business unit (a “QBU”) of a REIT if the QBU itself meets the 75% income test for the taxable year and the 75% asset test at the close of each quarter that the REIT has directly or indirectly held the QBU. Real estate foreign exchange gain also includes any other foreign currency gain as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury. Passive foreign exchange gain includes all real estate foreign exchange

16


gain and foreign currency gain which is attributable to: (i) any qualifying item of income or gain for purposes of the 95% gross income test; (ii) the acquisition or ownership of obligations; (iii) becoming or being the obligor under obligations; and (iv) any other foreign currency gain as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Generally, other than income from “clearly identified” hedging transactions entered into by us in the normal course of business, any foreign currency gain derived by us from dealing, or engaging in substantial and regular trading, in securities will constitute gross income which does not qualify under the 95% or 75% gross income tests.

Rents received by us will qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of satisfying the gross income tests for a REIT only if several conditions are met:

•     The amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person, although rents generally will not be excluded merely because they are based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales.

•     Rents received from a tenant will not qualify as rents from real property if the REIT, or an owner of 10% or more of the REIT, also directly or constructively owns 10% or more of the tenant, unless the tenant is our taxable REIT subsidiary and certain other requirements are met with respect to the real property being rented.

•     If rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to such personal property will not qualify as “rents from real property.”

•     For rents to qualify as rents from real property, we generally must not furnish or render services to tenants, other than through a taxable REIT subsidiary or an “independent contractor” from whom we derive no income, except that we may directly provide services that are “usually or customarily rendered” in the geographic area in which the property is located in connection with the rental of real property for occupancy only, or are not otherwise considered “rendered to the occupant for his convenience.”

•     For taxable years beginning after July 30, 2008, the REIT may lease qualified health care properties” on an arm’s-length basis to a taxable REIT subsidiary if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an “independent contractor” and who is, or is related to a person who is, actively engaged in the trade or business of operating health care facilities for any person unrelated to us or our taxable REIT subsidiary, an “ eligible independent contractor . Generally, the rent that the REIT receives from the taxable REIT subsidiary will be treated as “rents from real property.” A “qualified health care property” includes any real property and any personal property that is, or is necessary or incidental to the use of, a hospital, nursing facility, assisted living facility, congregate care facility, qualified continuing care facility, or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients and which is operated by a provider of such services which is eligible for participation in the Medicare program with respect to such facility.

A REIT is permitted to render a de minimis amount of impermissible services to tenants and still treat amounts received with respect to that property as rent from real property. The amount received or accrued by the REIT during the taxable year for the impermissible services with respect to a property may not exceed 1% of all amounts received or accrued by the REIT directly or indirectly from the property. The amount received for any service or management operation for this purpose shall be deemed to be not less than 150% of the direct cost of the REIT in furnishing or rendering the service or providing the management or operation. Furthermore, impermissible services may be furnished to tenants by a taxable REIT subsidiary subject to certain conditions, and we may still treat rents received with respect to the property as rent from real property.

The term “interest” generally does not include any amount if the determination of the amount depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person, although an amount generally will not be excluded from the term “interest” solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage of receipts or sales.

If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for such year if we are eligible for relief.  These relief provisions generally will be available if (1) following our identification of the failure, we file a schedule for such taxable year describing each item of our gross income, and (2) the failure to meet such tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.

It is not now possible to determine the circumstances under which we may be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. If these relief provisions apply, a 100% tax is imposed on an amount equal to (a) the gross income attributable to (1) 75% of our gross income over the amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 75% income test and (2) 95% of our gross income over the

17


amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 95% income test, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

The Secretary of the Treasury is given broad authority to determine whether particular items of income or gain qualify or not under the 75% and 95% gross income tests, or are to be excluded from the measure of gross income for such purposes.

Asset Tests. Within 30 days after the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must also satisfy several tests relating to the nature and diversification of our assets determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items (including receivables arising in the ordinary course of our operation), government securities and qualified temporary investments. Although the remaining 25% of our assets generally may be invested without restriction, we are prohibited from owning securities representing more than 10% of either the vote (the “10% vote test”) or value (the “10% value test”) of the outstanding securities of any issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary, another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary. Further, no more than 25% of the total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (the “25% asset test”) and no more than 5% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of any non-governmental issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary (the “5% asset test”), another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary. Each of the 10% vote test, the 10% value test and the 25% and 5% asset tests must be satisfied at the end of each quarter. There are special rules which provide relief if the value related tests are not satisfied due to changes in the value of the assets of a REIT.

Certain items are excluded from the 10% value test, including: (1) straight debt securities (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 1361(c)(5)) of an issuer (including straight debt that provides certain contingent payments); (2) any loan to an individual or an estate; (3) any rental agreement described in Section 467 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than with a “related person”; (4) any obligation to pay rents from real property; (5) certain securities issued by a state or any subdivision thereof, the District of Columbia, a foreign government, or any political subdivision thereof, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; (6) any security issued by a REIT; and (7) any other arrangement that, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, is excepted from the definition of security (“excluded securities”). Special rules apply to straight debt securities issued by corporations and entities taxable as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. If a REIT, or its taxable REIT subsidiary, holds (1) straight debt securities of a corporate or partnership issuer and (2) securities of such issuer that are not excluded securities and have an aggregate value greater than 1% of such issuer’s outstanding securities, the straight debt securities will be included in the 10% value test.

A REIT’s interest as a partner in a partnership is not treated as a security for purposes of applying the 10% value test to securities issued by the partnership. Further, any debt instrument issued by a partnership will not be a security for purposes of applying the 10% value test (1) to the extent of the REIT’s interest as a partner in the partnership and (2) if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) would qualify for the 75% gross income test.  For purposes of the 10% value test, a REIT’s interest in a partnership’s assets is determined by the REIT’s proportionate interest in any securities issued by the partnership (other than the excluded securities described in the preceding paragraph).

For taxable years beginning after July 30, 2008, if the REIT or its QBU uses a foreign currency as its functional currency, the term “cash” includes such foreign currency, but only to the extent such foreign currency is (i) held for use in the normal course of the activities of the REIT or QBU which give rise to items of income or gain that are included in the 95% and 75% gross income tests or are directly related to acquiring or holding assets qualifying under the 75% asset test, and (ii) not held in connection with dealing or engaging in substantial and regular trading in securities.

With respect to corrections of failures as to violations of the 10% vote test, the 10% value test or the 5% asset test, a REIT may avoid disqualification as a REIT by disposing of sufficient assets to cure a violation that does not exceed the lesser of 1% of the REIT’s assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000, provided that the disposition occurs within six months following the last day of the quarter in which the REIT first identified the assets. For violations of any of the REIT asset tests due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect that exceed the thresholds described in the preceding sentence, a REIT can avoid disqualification as a REIT after the close of a taxable quarter by taking certain steps, including disposition of sufficient assets within the six month period described above to meet the applicable asset test, paying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets during the period of time that the assets were held as non-qualifying assets and filing a schedule with the Internal Revenue Service that describes the non-qualifying assets.

Investments in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. REITs may own more than 10% of the voting power and value of securities in taxable REIT subsidiaries. We and any taxable corporate entity in which we own an interest are allowed to jointly elect to treat such entity as a “taxable REIT subsidiary.”

Certain of our subsidiaries have elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary. Taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to full corporate level federal taxation on their earnings but are permitted to engage in certain types of activities that cannot be performed directly by REITs without jeopardizing their REIT status. Our taxable REIT subsidiaries will attempt to minimize the amount of these taxes, but there can be no assurance whether or the extent to which measures taken to minimize taxes will be successful. To the extent

18


our taxable REIT subsidiaries are required to pay federal, state or local taxes, the cash available for distribution as dividends to us from our taxable REIT subsidiaries will be reduced.

The amount of interest on related-party debt that a taxable REIT subsidiary may deduct is limited. Further, a 100% tax applies to any interest payments by a taxable REIT subsidiary to its affiliated REIT to the extent the interest rate is not commercially reasonable. A taxable REIT subsidiary is permitted to deduct interest payments to unrelated parties without any of these restrictions.

The Internal Revenue Service may reallocate costs between a REIT and its taxable REIT subsidiary where there is a lack of arm’s-length dealing between the parties. Any deductible expenses allocated away from a taxable REIT subsidiary would increase its tax liability. Further, any amount by which a REIT understates its deductions and overstates those of its taxable REIT subsidiary may, subject to certain exceptions, be subject to a 100% tax. Additional taxable REIT subsidiary elections may be made in the future for additional entities in which we obtain an interest.

Annual Distribution Requirements. In order to avoid being taxed as a regular corporation, we are required to make distributions (other than capital gain distributions) to our stockholders which qualify for the dividends paid deduction in an amount at least equal to (1) the sum of (i) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain) and (ii) 90% of the after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property, minus (2) a portion of certain items of non-cash income. These distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for that year and if paid on or before the first regular distribution payment after such declaration. The amount distributed must not be preferential. This means that every stockholder of the class of stock to which a distribution is made must be treated the same as every other stockholder of that class, and no class of stock may be treated otherwise than in accordance with its dividend rights as a class. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on the undistributed amount at regular corporate tax rates.  As discussed above, we may be subject to an excise tax if we fail to meet certain other distribution requirements. We believe we have satisfied the annual distribution requirements for the year of our initial REIT election and each year thereafter through the year ended December 31, 2012. Although we intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy these annual distribution requirements for subsequent years, economic, market, legal, tax or other factors could limit our ability to meet those requirements. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors.”

It is also possible that, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirement, or to distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, due to, among other things, (1) timing differences between (i) the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses and (ii) the inclusion of income and deduction of expenses in arriving at our taxable income, or (2) the payment of severance benefits that may not be deductible to us. In the event that timing differences occur, we may find it necessary to arrange for borrowings or, if possible, pay dividends in the form of taxable stock dividends in order to meet the distribution requirement.

Under certain circumstances, in the event of a deficiency determined by the Internal Revenue Service, we may be able to rectify a resulting failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to stockholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for distributions paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may be able to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends; however, we will be required to pay applicable penalties and interest based upon the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividend distributions.

Failure to Qualify as a REIT

If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT will not be deductible nor will any particular amount of distributions be required to be made in any year. All distributions to stockholders will be taxable as ordinary income to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits allocable to these distributions and, subject to certain limitations, will be eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporate stockholders. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we also will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to statutory relief. Failure to qualify for even one year could result in our need to incur indebtedness or liquidate investments in order to pay potentially significant resulting tax liabilities.

In addition to the relief described above under “— Income Tests” and “— Asset Tests,” relief is available in the event that we violate a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT if: (1) the violation is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect; (2) we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each failure to satisfy the provision; and (3) the violation does not include a violation described under “— Income Tests” or “— Asset Tests” above. It is not now possible to determine the circumstances under which we may be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions.

19


Federal Income Taxation of Holders of Our Stock

Treatment of Taxable U.S. Stockholders. The following summary applies to you only if you are a “U.S. stockholder.” A “U.S. stockholder” is a holder of shares of stock who, for United States federal income tax purposes, is:

•     a citizen or resident of the United State s;

•     a corporation, partnership or other entity classified as a corporation or partnership for these purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision of the United States, including any state;

•     an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

•     a trust, if, in general, a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons, within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, has the authority to control all of the trust’s substantial decisions.

So long as we qualify for taxation as a REIT, distributions on shares of our stock made out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits allocable to these distributions (and not designated as capital gain dividends) will be includable as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes. None of these distributions will be eligible for the dividends received deduction for U.S. corporate stockholders.

Generally, for taxable years following the year ended December 31, 2012, the maximum marginal rate of tax payable by individuals on dividends received from corporations that are subject to a corporate level of tax is 20%. Except in limited circumstances, this tax rate will not apply to dividends paid to you by us on our shares, because generally we are not subject to federal income tax on the portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gains distributed to our stockholders. The reduced maximum federal income tax rate will apply to that portion, if any, of dividends received by you with respect to our shares that are attributable to: (1) dividends received by us from non-REIT corporations or other taxable REIT subsidiaries; (2) income from the prior year with respect to which we were required to pay federal corporate income tax during the prior year (if, for example, we did not distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income for the prior year); or (3) the amount of any earnings and profits that were distributed by us and accumulated in a non-REIT year.

Distributions that are designated as capital gain dividends will be taxed as long-term capital gains (to the extent they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year), without regard to the period for which you held our stock. However, if you are a corporation, you may be required to treat a portion of some capital gain dividends as ordinary income.

If we elect to retain and pay income tax on any net long-term capital gain, you would include in income, as long-term capital gain, your proportionate share of this net long-term capital gain. You would also receive a refundable tax credit for your proportionate share of the tax paid by us on such retained capital gains, and you would have an increase in the basis of your shares of our stock in an amount equal to your includable capital gains less your share of the tax deemed paid.

You may not include in your federal income tax return any of our net operating losses or capital losses. Federal income tax rules may also require that certain minimum tax adjustments and preferences be apportioned to you. In addition, any distribution declared by us in October, November or December of any year on a specified date in any such month shall be treated as both paid by us and received by you on December 31 of that year, provided that the distribution is actually paid by us no later than January 31 of the following year.

We will be treated as having sufficient earnings and profits to treat as a dividend any distribution up to the amount required to be distributed in order to avoid imposition of the 4% excise tax discussed under “— General” and “— Qualification as a REIT — Annual Distribution Requirements” above. As a result, you may be required to treat as taxable dividends certain distributions that would otherwise result in a tax-free return of capital. Moreover, any “deficiency dividend” will be treated as a dividend (an ordinary dividend or a capital gain dividend, as the case may be), regardless of our earnings and profits. Any other distributions in excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to you to the extent these distributions do not exceed the adjusted tax basis of your shares of our stock. You will be required to reduce the tax basis of your shares of our stock by the amount of these distributions until the basis has been reduced to zero, after which these distributions will be taxable as capital gain, if the shares of our stock are held as capital assets. The tax basis as so reduced will be used in computing the capital gain or loss, if any, realized upon sale of the shares of our stock. Any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares of our stock which were held for six months or less (after application of certain holding period rules) will generally be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent you previously received capital gain distributions with respect to these shares of our stock.

20


Upon the sale or exchange of any shares of our stock to or with a person other than us or a sale or exchange of all shares of our stock (whether actually or constructively owned) with us, you will generally recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and your adjusted tax basis in these shares of our stock. This gain will be capital gain if you held these shares of our stock as a capital asset.

If we redeem any of your shares in us, the treatment can only be determined on the basis of particular facts at the time of redemption. In general, you will recognize gain or loss (as opposed to dividend income) equal to the difference between the amount received by you in the redemption and your adjusted tax basis in your shares redeemed if such redemption: (1) results in a “complete termination” of your interest in all classes of our equity securities; (2) is a “substantially disproportionate redemption”; or (3) is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” with respect to you. In applying these tests, you must take into account your ownership of all classes of our equity securities (e.g., common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants). You also must take into account any equity securities that are considered to be constructively owned by you.

If, as a result of a redemption by us of your shares, you no longer own (either actually or constructively) any of our equity securities or only own (actually and constructively) an insubstantial percentage of our equity securities, then it is probable that the redemption of your shares would be considered “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” and, thus, would result in gain or loss to you. However, whether a distribution is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” depends on all of the facts and circumstances, and if you rely on any of these tests at the time of redemption, you should consult your tax advisor to determine their application to the particular situation.

Generally, if the redemption does not meet the tests described above, then the proceeds received by you from the redemption of your shares will be treated as a distribution taxable as a dividend to the extent of the allocable portion of current or accumulated earnings and profits. If the redemption is taxed as a dividend, your adjusted tax basis in the redeemed shares will be transferred to any other shareholdings in us that you own. If you own no other shareholdings in us, under certain circumstances, such basis may be transferred to a related person, or it may be lost entirely.

Gain from the sale or exchange of our shares held for more than one year is generally taxed at a maximum long-term capital gain rate of 20% in the case of stockholders who are individuals and 35% in the case of stockholders that are corporations.  Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service guidance, we may classify portions of our capital gain dividends as gains eligible for the long-term capital gains rate or as gain taxable to individual stockholders at a maximum rate of 25%.  Capital losses recognized by a stockholder upon the disposition of our shares held for more than one year at the time of disposition will be considered long term capital losses, and are generally available only to offset capital gain income of the stockholder but not ordinary income (except in the case of individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year).

An additional tax of 3.8% generally will be imposed on the “net investment income” of U.S. stockholders who meet certain requirements and are individuals, estates or certain trusts for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.  Among other items, “net investment income” generally includes gross income from dividends and net gain attributable to the disposition of certain property, such as shares of our common stock or warrants. In the case of individuals, this tax will only apply to the extent such individual’s modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples filing a joint return and surviving spouses, and $125,000 for married individuals filing a separate return). U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the possible applicability of this additional tax in their particular circumstances.

Treatment of Tax-Exempt U.S. Stockholders. Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts (“Exempt Organizations”), generally are exempt from federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”). The Internal Revenue Service has issued a published revenue ruling that dividend distributions from a REIT to an exempt employee pension trust do not constitute UBTI, provided that the shares of the REIT are not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business of the exempt employee pension trust. Based on this ruling, amounts distributed by us to Exempt Organizations generally should not constitute UBTI. However, if an Exempt Organization finances its acquisition of the shares of our stock with debt, a portion of its income from us will constitute UBTI pursuant to the “debt financed property” rules. Likewise, a portion of the Exempt Organization’s income from us would constitute UBTI if we held a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit.

In addition, in certain circumstances, a pension trust that owns more than 10% of our stock is required to treat a percentage of our dividends as UBTI. This rule applies to a pension trust holding more than 10% of our stock only if: (1) the percentage of our income that is UBTI (determined as if we were a pension trust) is at least 5%; (2) we qualify as a REIT by reason of the modification of the Five or Fewer Requirement that allows beneficiaries of the pension trust to be treated as holding shares in proportion to their actuarial interests in the pension trust; and (3) either (i) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our stock, or (ii) a group of pension trusts individually holding more than 10% of the value of our stock collectively own more than 50% of the value of our stock.

21


Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. Under certain circumstances, you may be subject to backup withholding at applicable rates on payments made with respect to, or cash proceeds of a sale or exchange of, shares of our stock. Backup withholding will apply only if you: (1) fail to provide a correct taxpayer identification number, which if you are an individual, is ordinarily your social security number; (2) furnish an incorrect taxpayer identification number; (3) are notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you have failed to properly report payments of interest or dividends; or (4) fail to certify, under penalties of perjury, that you have furnished a correct taxpayer identification number and that the Internal Revenue Service has not notified you that you are subject to backup withholding.

Backup withholding will not apply with respect to payments made to certain exempt recipients, such as corporations and tax-exempt organizations. You should consult with a tax advisor regarding qualification for exemption from backup withholding, and the procedure for obtaining an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to a payment to a stockholder will be allowed as a credit against such stockholder’s United States federal income tax liability and may entitle such stockholder to a refund, provided that the required information is provided to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, withholding a portion of capital gain distributions made to stockholders may be required for stockholders who fail to certify their non-foreign status.

Taxation of Foreign Stockholders. The following summary applies to you only if you are a foreign person. The federal taxation of foreign persons is a highly complex matter that may be affected by many considerations.

Except as discussed below, distributions to you of cash generated by our real estate operations in the form of ordinary dividends, but not by the sale or exchange of our capital assets, generally will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30%, unless an applicable tax treaty reduces that tax and you file with us the required form evidencing the lower rate.

In general, you will be subject to United States federal income tax on a graduated rate basis rather than withholding with respect to your investment in our stock if such investment is “effectively connected” with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. A corporate foreign stockholder that receives income that is, or is treated as, effectively connected with a United States trade or business may also be subject to the branch profits tax, which is payable in addition to regular United States corporate income tax. The following discussion will apply to foreign stockholders whose investment in us is not so effectively connected. We expect to withhold United States income tax, as described below, on the gross amount of any distributions paid to you unless (1) you file an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI with us claiming that the distribution is “effectively connected” or (2) certain other exceptions apply.

Distributions by us that are attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest will be taxed to you under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”) as if these distributions were gains “effectively connected” with a United States trade or business. Accordingly, you will be taxed at the normal capital gain rates applicable to a U.S. stockholder on these amounts, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. Distributions subject to FIRPTA may also be subject to a branch profits tax in the hands of a corporate foreign stockholder that is not entitled to treaty exemption.

We will be required to withhold from distributions subject to FIRPTA, and remit to the Internal Revenue Service, 35% of designated capital gain dividends, or, if greater, 35% of the amount of any distributions that could be designated as capital gain dividends. In addition, if we designate prior distributions as capital gain dividends, subsequent distributions, up to the amount of the prior distributions not withheld against, will be treated as capital gain dividends for purposes of withholding.

Any capital gain dividend with respect to any class of stock that is “regularly traded” on an established securities market will be treated as an ordinary dividend if the foreign stockholder did not own more than 5% of such class of stock at any time during the taxable year. Foreign stockholders generally will not be required to report distributions received from us on U.S. federal income tax returns and all distributions treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes (including any such capital gain dividends) will be subject to a 30% U.S. withholding tax (unless reduced under an applicable income tax treaty) as discussed above. In addition, the branch profits tax will not apply to such distributions.

Unless our shares constitute a “United States real property interest” within the meaning of FIRPTA or are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, a sale of our shares by you generally will not be subject to United States taxation. Our shares will not constitute a United States real property interest if we qualify as a “domestically controlled REIT.” We believe that we, and expect to continue to, qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which at all times during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by foreign stockholders. However, if you are a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions apply, you will be subject to a 30% tax on such capital gains. In any event, a purchaser of our shares from you will not be required under FIRPTA to withhold on the purchase price if the purchased shares are “regularly traded” on an established securities

22


market or if we are a domestically controlled REIT. Otherwise, under FIRPTA, the purchaser may be required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the Internal Revenue Service.

Backup withholding tax and information reporting will generally not apply to distributions paid to you outside the United States that are treated as: (1) dividends to which the 30% or lower treaty rate withholding tax discussed above applies; (2) capital gains dividends; or (3) distributions attributable to gain from the sale or exchange by us of U.S. real property interests. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of stock within the United States or conducted through certain U.S. related financial intermediaries is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that he or she is not a U.S. person (and the payor does not have actual knowledge that the beneficial owner is a U.S. person) or otherwise established an exemption. You may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.

Withholding tax at a rate of 30% will be imposed on certain payments to you or certain foreign financial institutions (including investment funds) and other non-US persons receiving payments on your behalf, including distributions in respect of shares of our stock and gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our stock, if you or such institutions fail to comply with certain due diligence, disclosure and reporting rules, as set forth in recently issued Treasury regulations. Accordingly, the entity through which shares of our stock are held will affect the determination of whether such withholding is required. Withholding will apply to payments of dividends made after December 31, 2013, and to payments of gross proceeds from a sale of shares of our stock made after December 31, 2016.  Stockholders that are otherwise eligible for an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. withholding taxes with respect to such dividends and proceeds will be required to seek a refund from the Internal Revenue Service to obtain the benefit of such exemption or reduction.  Additional requirements and conditions may be imposed pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement, if and when entered into, between the United States and such institution’s home jurisdiction. We will not pay any additional amounts to any stockholders in respect of any amounts withheld. You are encouraged to consult with your tax advisor regarding U.S. withholding taxes and the application of the recently issued Treasury regulations in light of your particular circumstances.

U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Holders of Depositary Shares

Owners of our depositary shares will be treated as if you were owners of the series of preferred stock represented by the depositary shares. Thus, you will be required to take into account the income and deductions to which you would be entitled if you were a holder of the underlying series of preferred stock.

Conversion or Exchange of Shares for Preferred Stock. No gain or loss will be recognized upon the withdrawal of preferred stock in exchange for depositary shares and the tax basis of each share of preferred stock will, upon exchange, be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the depositary shares exchanged. If you held your depositary shares as a capital asset at the time of the exchange for shares of preferred stock, the holding period for your shares of preferred stock will include the period during which you owned the depositary shares.

U.S. Federal Income and Estate Taxation of Holders of Our Debt Securities

The following is a general summary of the United States federal income tax consequences and, in the case that you are a holder that is a non-U.S. holder, as defined below, the United States federal estate tax consequences, of purchasing, owning and disposing of debt securities periodically offered under one or more indentures (the “notes”). This summary assumes that you hold the notes as capital assets. This summary applies to you only if you are the initial holder of the notes and you acquire the notes for a price equal to the issue price of the notes. The issue price of the notes is the first price at which a substantial amount of the notes is sold other than to bond houses, brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers. In addition, this summary does not consider any foreign, state, local or other tax laws that may be applicable to us or a purchaser of the notes.

U.S. Holders

The following summary applies to you only if you are a U.S. holder, as defined below.

Definition of a U.S. Holder. A “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of a note or notes that is for United States federal income tax purposes:

•     a citizen or resident of the United States;

•     a corporation, partnership or other entity classified as a corporation or partnership for these purposes, created or organized in or

23


under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision of the United States, including any state;

•     an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

•     a trust, if, in general, a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons, within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, has the authority to control all of the trust’s substantial decisions.

Payments of Interest. Stated interest on the notes generally will be taxed as ordinary interest income from domestic sources at the time it is paid or accrues in accordance with your method of accounting for tax purposes.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Notes. The adjusted tax basis in your note acquired at a premium will generally be your cost. You generally will recognize taxable gain or loss when you sell or otherwise dispose of your notes equal to the difference, if any, between:

•     the amount realized on the sale or other disposition, less any amount attributable to any accrued interest, which will be taxable in the manner described under “— Payments of Interest” above; and

•     your adjusted tax basis in the notes.

Your gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss. This capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if at the time of the sale or other disposition you have held the notes for more than one year. Subject to limited exceptions, your capital losses cannot be used to offset your ordinary income (except in the case of individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year).

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. In general, “backup withholding” may apply to any payments made to you of principal and interest on your note, and to payment of the proceeds of a sale or other disposition of your note before maturity, if you are a non-corporate U.S. holder and: (1) fail to provide a correct taxpayer identification number, which if you are an individual, is ordinarily your social security number; (2) furnish an incorrect taxpayer identification number; (3) are notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you have failed to properly report payments of interest or dividends; or (4) fail to certify, under penalties of perjury, that you have furnished a correct taxpayer identification number and that the Internal Revenue Service has not notified you that you are subject to backup withholding.

The amount of any reportable payments, including interest, made to you (unless you are an exempt recipient) and the amount of tax withheld, if any, with respect to such payments will be reported to you and to the Internal Revenue Service for each calendar year. You should consult your tax advisor regarding your qualification for an exemption from backup withholding and the procedures for obtaining such an exemption, if applicable. The backup withholding tax is not an additional tax and will be credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that correct information is provided to the Internal Revenue Service.

Non-U.S. Holders

The following summary applies to you if you are a beneficial owner of a note and are not a U.S. holder, as defined above (a “non-U.S. holder”).

Special rules may apply to certain non-U.S. holders such as “controlled foreign corporations,” “passive foreign investment companies” and “foreign personal holding companies.” Such entities are encouraged to consult their tax advisors to determine the United States federal, state, local and other tax consequences that may be relevant to them.

U.S. Federal Withholding Tax. Subject to the discussion below, U.S. federal withholding tax will not apply to payments by us or our paying agent, in its capacity as such, of principal and interest on your notes under the “portfolio interest” exception of the Internal Revenue Code, provided that:

•     you do not, directly or indirectly, actually or constructively, own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock entitled to vote;

•     you are not (1) a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is related, directly or indirectly, to us through sufficient stock ownership, as provided in the Internal Revenue Code, or (2) a bank receiving interest described in Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code;

24


•     such interest is not effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business; and

•     you provide a signed written statement, under penalties of perjury, which can reliably be related to you, certifying that you are not a U.S. person within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code and providing your name and address to:

•     us or our paying agent; or

a securities clearing organization, bank or other financial institution that holds customers’ securities in the ordinary course of its trade or business and holds your notes on your behalf and that certifies to us or our paying agent under penalties of perjury that it, or the bank or financial institution between it and you, has received from you your signed, written statement and provides us or our paying agent with a copy of such statement.

Treasury regulations provide that:

•     if you are a foreign partnership, the certification requirement will generally apply to your partners, and you will be required to provide certain information;

•     if you are a foreign trust, the certification requirement will generally be applied to you or your beneficial owners depending on whether you are a “foreign complex trust,” “foreign simple trust,” or “foreign grantor trust” as defined in the Treasury regulations; and

•     look-through rules will apply for tiered partnerships, foreign simple trusts and foreign grantor trusts.

If you are a foreign partnership or a foreign trust, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding your status under these Treasury regulations and the certification requirements applicable to you.

If you cannot satisfy the portfolio interest requirements described above, payments of interest will be subject to the 30% United States withholding tax, unless you provide us with a properly executed (1) Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN claiming an exemption from or reduction in withholding under the benefit of an applicable treaty or (2) Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI stating that interest paid on the note is not subject to withholding tax because it is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Alternative documentation may be applicable in certain circumstances.

If you are engaged in a trade or business in the United States and interest on a note is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business, you will be required to pay United States federal income tax on that interest on a net income basis (although you will be exempt from the 30% withholding tax provided the certification requirement described above is met) in the same manner as if you were a U.S. person, except as otherwise provided by an applicable tax treaty. If you are a foreign corporation, you may be required to pay a branch profits tax on the earnings and profits that are effectively connected to the conduct of your trade or business in the United States.

Withholding tax at a rate of 30% will be imposed on payments of interest (including original issue discount) and gross proceeds of sale in respect of debt instruments to you or certain foreign financial institutions (including investment funds) and other non-US persons receiving payments on your behalf, if you or such institutions fail to comply with certain due diligence, disclosure and reporting rules, as set forth in recently issued Treasury regulations. However, the Treasury regulations generally exempt from such withholding requirement obligations, such as debt instruments, issued before January 1, 2014, provided that any material modification of such an obligation made after such date will result in such obligation being considered newly issued as of the effective date of such modification. These withholding rules are generally effective with respect to payments of interest made after December 31, 2013, and with respect to proceeds of sales received after December 31, 2016. We will not pay any additional amounts to any holders or our debt instruments in respect of any amounts withheld. You are encouraged to consult with your tax advisor regarding U.S. withholding taxes and the application of the recently issued Treasury regulations in light of your particular circumstances.

Sale, Exchange or other Disposition of Notes. You generally will not have to pay U.S. federal income tax on any gain or income realized from the sale, redemption, retirement at maturity or other disposition of your notes, unless:

•     in the case of gain, you are an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of the sale or other disposition of your notes, and specific other conditions are met;

•     you are subject to tax provisions applicable to certain United States expatriates; or

25


•     the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business.

If you are engaged in a trade or business in the United States, and gain with respect to your notes is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business, you generally will be subject to U.S. income tax on a net basis on the gain. In addition, if you are a foreign corporation, you may be subject to a branch profits tax on your effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, as adjusted for certain items.

U.S. Federal Estate Tax. If you are an individual and are not a U.S. citizen or a resident of the United States, as specially defined for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, at the time of your death, your notes will generally not be subject to the U.S. federal estate tax, unless, at the time of your death (1) you owned actually or constructively 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all our classes of stock entitled to vote, or (2) interest on the notes is effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. Backup withholding will not apply to payments of principal or interest made by us or our paying agent, in its capacity as such, to you if you have provided the required certification that you are a non-U.S. holder as described in “— U.S. Federal Withholding Tax” above, and provided that neither we nor our paying agent have actual knowledge that you are a U.S. holder, as described in “— U.S. Holders” above. We or our paying agent may, however, report payments of interest on the notes.

The gross proceeds from the disposition of your notes may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax. If you sell your notes outside the United States through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United States, then the U.S. backup withholding and information reporting requirements generally will not apply to that payment. However, U.S. information reporting, but not backup withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United States, if you sell your notes through a non-U.S. office of a broker that:

•     is a U.S. person, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code;

•     derives 50% or more of its gross income in specific periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United States;

•     is a “controlled foreign corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes; or

•     is a foreign partnership, if at any time during its tax year, one or more of its partners are U.S. persons who in the aggregate hold more than 50% of the income or capital interests in the partnership, or the foreign partnership is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that you are a non-U.S. person and certain other conditions are met or you otherwise establish an exemption. If you receive payments of the proceeds of a sale of your notes to or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment is subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information reporting unless you provide a Form W-8BEN certifying that you are a non-U.S. person or you otherwise establish an exemption.

You should consult your own tax advisor regarding application of backup withholding in your particular circumstance and the availability of and procedure for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to you will be allowed as a refund or credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

U.S. Federal Income and Estate Taxation of Holders of Our Warrants

Exercise of Warrants. You will not generally recognize gain or loss upon the exercise of a warrant. Your basis in the debt securities, preferred stock, depositary shares or common stock, as the case may be, received upon the exercise of the warrant will be equal to the sum of your adjusted tax basis in the warrant and the exercise price paid. Your holding period in the debt securities, preferred stock, depositary shares or common stock, as the case may be, received upon the exercise of the warrant will not include the period during which the warrant was held by you.

Expiration of Warrants. Upon the expiration of a warrant, you will recognize a capital loss in an amount equal to your adjusted tax basis in the warrant.

Sale or Exchange of Warrants. Upon the sale or exchange of a warrant to a person other than us, you will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and your adjusted tax basis in the warrant. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the warrant was held for more than one year.

26


Upon the sale of the warrant to us, the Internal Revenue Service may argue that you should recognize ordinary income on the sale. You are advised to consult your own tax advisors as to the consequences of a sale of a warrant to us.

Potential Legislation or Other Actions Affecting Tax Consequences

Current and prospective securities holders should recognize that the present federal income tax treatment of an investment in us may be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time and that any such action may affect investments and commitments previously made. The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department, resulting in revisions of regulations and revised interpretations of established concepts as well as statutory changes. Revisions in federal tax laws and interpretations of these laws could adversely affect the tax consequences of an investment in us.

State, Local and Foreign Taxes

We, and holders of our debt and equity securities, may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which we or they transact business, own property or reside. It should be noted that we own properties located in a number of state, local and foreign jurisdictions, and may be required to file tax returns in some or all of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax treatment of us and holders of our debt and equity securities may not conform to the U.S. federal income tax consequences discussed above. Consequently, you are urged to consult your advisor regarding the application and effect of state, local and foreign tax laws with respect to any investment in our securities.

Internet Access to Our SEC Filings

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as well as our proxy statements and other materials that are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission are made available, free of charge, on the Internet at www.hcreit.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors

This section discusses the most significant factors that affect our business, operations and financial condition. It does not describe all risks and uncertainties applicable to us, our industry or ownership of our securities. If any of the following risks, as well as other risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we currently think are not material, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected. In that event, the value of our securities could decline.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference contain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those regarding:

•     the possible expansion of our portfolio, including our ability to close our anticipated acquisitions and investments on currently anticipated terms, or within currently anticipated timeframes, or at all;

•     the sale of properties;

•     the performance of our operators/tenants and properties;

•     our ability to enter into agreements with new viable tenants for vacant space or for properties that we take back from financially troubled tenants, if any;

•     our occupancy rates;

•     our ability to acquire, develop and/or manage properties;

•     our ability to make distributions to stockholders;

27


•     our policies and plans regarding investments, financings and other matters;

•     our ability to successfully manage the risks associated with international expansion and operations;

•     our tax status as a real estate investment trust;

•     our critical accounting policies;

•     our ability to appropriately balance the use of debt and equity;

•     our ability to access capital markets or other sources of funds; and

•     our ability to meet our earnings guidance.

When we use words such as “may,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Our expected results may not be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. This may be a result of various factors, including, but not limited to:

•     the status of the economy;

•     the status of capital markets, including availability and cost of capital;

•     issues facing the health care industry, including compliance with, and changes to, regulations and payment policies, responding to government investigations and punitive settlements and operators’/tenants’ difficulty in cost-effectively obtaining and maintaining adequate liability and other insurance;

•     changes in financing terms;

•     competition within the health care, seniors housing and life science industries;

•     negative developments in the operating results or financial condition of operators/tenants, including, but not limited to, their ability to pay rent and repay loans;

•     our ability to transition or sell facilities with profitable results;

•     the failure to make new investments as and when anticipated;

•     acts of God affecting our properties;

•     our ability to re-lease space at similar rates as vacancies occur;

•     our ability to timely reinvest sale proceeds at similar rates to assets sold;

•     operator/tenant or joint venture partner bankruptcies or insolvencies;

•     the cooperation of joint venture partners;

•     government regulations affecting Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates and operational requirements;

•     regulatory approval and market acceptance of the products and technologies of life science tenants;

•     liability or contract claims by or against operators/tenants;

•     unanticipated difficulties and/or expenditures relating to future acquisitions;

•     environmental laws affecting our properties;

28


•     changes in rules or practices governing our financial reporting;

•     the movement of U.S. and foreign currency exchange rates;

•     qualification as a REIT;

•     key management personnel recruitment and retention; and

•     the risks described below:

Risk factors related to our operators’ revenues and expenses

Our operators’ revenues are primarily driven by occupancy, private pay rates, and Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, if applicable. Expenses for these facilities are primarily driven by the costs of labor, food, utilities, taxes, insurance and rent or debt service. Revenues from government reimbursement have, and may continue to, come under pressure due to reimbursement cuts and state budget shortfalls. Operating costs continue to increase for our operators. To the extent that any decrease in revenues and/or any increase in operating expenses result in a property not generating enough cash to make payments to us, the credit of our operator and the value of other collateral would have to be relied upon. To the extent the value of such property is reduced, we may need to record an impairment for such asset. Furthermore, if we determine to dispose of an underperforming property, such sale may result in a loss. Any such impairment or loss on sale would negatively affect our financial results.

The continued weakened economy may have an adverse effect on our operators and tenants, including their ability to access credit or maintain occupancy and/or private pay rates. If the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our operators are materially adversely impacted by economic conditions, our revenue and operations may be adversely affected.

Increased competition may affect our operators’ ability to meet their obligations to us

The operators of our properties compete on a local and regional basis with operators of properties and other health care providers that provide comparable services. We cannot be certain that the operators of all of our facilities will be able to achieve and maintain occupancy and rate levels that will enable them to meet all of their obligations to us. Our operators are expected to encounter increased competition in the future that could limit their ability to attract residents or expand their businesses.

Risk factors related to obligor bankruptcies

We are exposed to the risk that our obligors may not be able to meet the rent, principal and interest or other payments due us, which may result in an obligor bankruptcy or insolvency, or that an obligor might become subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings for other reasons. Although our operating lease agreements provide us with the right to evict a tenant, demand immediate payment of rent and exercise other remedies, and our loans provide us with the right to terminate any funding obligation, demand immediate repayment of principal and unpaid interest, foreclose on the collateral and exercise other remedies, the bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. An obligor in bankruptcy or subject to insolvency proceedings may be able to limit or delay our ability to collect unpaid rent in the case of a lease or to receive unpaid principal and interest in the case of a loan, and to exercise other rights and remedies.

We may be required to fund certain expenses (e.g., real estate taxes and maintenance) to preserve the value of an investment property, avoid the imposition of liens on a property and/or transition a property to a new tenant. In some instances, we have terminated our lease with a tenant and relet the property to another tenant. In some of those situations, we have provided working capital loans to and limited indemnification of the new obligor. If we cannot transition a leased property to a new tenant, we may take possession of that property, which may expose us to certain successor liabilities. Should such events occur, our revenue and operating cash flow may be adversely affected.

Transfers of health care facilities may require regulatory approvals and these facilities may not have efficient alternative uses

Transfers of health care facilities to successor operators frequently are subject to regulatory approvals or notifications, including, but not limited to, change of ownership approvals under certificate of need (“CON”) or determination of need laws, state licensure laws and Medicare and Medicaid provider arrangements, that are not required for transfers of other types of real estate. The replacement of a health care facility operator could be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the facility or the replacement of the operator licensed to manage the facility. Alternatively, given the specialized nature of our facilities, we may be required to spend substantial time and funds to adapt these properties to other uses. If we are unable

29


to timely transfer properties to successor operators or find efficient alternative uses, our revenue and operations may be adversely affected.

Risk factors related to government regulations

Some of our obligors’ businesses are affected by government reimbursement. To the extent that an operator/tenant receives a significant portion of its revenues from government payors, primarily Medicare and Medicaid, such revenues may be subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive rate adjustments, recovery of program overpayments or set-offs, court decisions, administrative rulings, policy interpretations, payment or other delays by fiscal intermediaries or carriers, government funding restrictions (at a program level or with respect to specific facilities) and interruption or delays in payments due to any ongoing government investigations and audits at such property. In recent years, government payors have frozen or reduced payments to health care providers due to budgetary pressures. Health care reimbursement will likely continue to be of paramount importance to federal and state authorities. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or effect any future legislative reforms may have on the financial condition of our obligors and properties. There can be no assurance that adequate reimbursement levels will be available for services provided by any property operator, whether the property receives reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid or private payors. Significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees could have a material adverse effect on an obligor’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, which could adversely affect the ability of an obligor to meet its obligations to us. See “Item 1 — Business — Certain Government Regulations — Reimbursement” above.

Our operators and tenants generally are subject to varying levels of federal, state, local, and industry-regulated licensure, certification and inspection laws, regulations, and standards.  Our operators’ or tenants’ failure to comply with any of these laws, regulations, or standards could result in loss of accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, suspension, decertification or exclusion from federal and state health care programs, loss of license or closure of the facility. Such actions may have an effect on our operators’ or tenants’ ability to make lease payments to us and, therefore, adversely impact us. See “Item 1 — Business — Certain Government Regulations — Other Related Laws” above.

Many of our properties may require a license, registration, and/or CON to operate. Failure to obtain a license, registration, or CON, or loss of a required license, registration, or CON would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by the operators or tenants. These events could materially adversely affect our operators’ or tenants’ ability to make rent payments to us.  State and local laws also may regulate the expansion, including the addition of new beds or services or acquisition of medical equipment, and the construction or renovation of health care facilities, by requiring a CON or other similar approval from a state agency. See “Item 1 — Business — Certain Government Regulations — Licensing and Certification” above.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Health Reform Laws”), provides states with an increased federal medical assistance percentage under certain conditions. On June 28, 2012, The United States Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate of the Health Reform Laws but partially invalidated the expansion of Medicaid. The ruling on Medicaid expansion will allow states not to participate in the expansion—and to forego funding for the Medicaid expansion—without losing their existing Medicaid funding. Given that the federal government substantially funds the Medicaid expansion, it is unclear whether any state will pursue this option, although at least some appear to be considering this option at this time. The participation by states in the Medicaid expansion could have the dual effect of increasing our tenants’ revenues, through new patients, but further straining state budgets. While the federal government will pay for approximately 100% of those additional costs from 2014 to 2016, states will be expected to begin paying for part of those additional costs in 2017. With increasingly strained budgets, it is unclear how states will pay their share of these additional Medicaid costs and what other health care expenditures could be reduced as a result. A significant reduction in other health care related spending by states to pay for increased Medicaid costs could affect our tenants’ revenue streams. See “Item 1 — Business — Certain Government Regulations — Reimbursement” above and “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Health Care Industry—Health Reform Laws” below.

More generally, and because of the dynamic nature of the legislative and regulatory environment for health care products and services, and in light of existing federal deficit and budgetary concerns, we cannot predict the impact that broad-based, far-reaching legislative or regulatory changes could have on the U.S. economy, our business or that of our tenants.

Risk factors related to liability claims and insurance costs

In recent years, skilled nursing and seniors housing operators have experienced substantial increases in both the number and size of patient care liability claims. As a result, general and professional liability costs have increased in some markets. General and professional liability insurance coverage may be restricted or very costly, which may adversely affect the property operators’ future

30


operations, cash flows and financial condition, and may have a material adverse effect on the property operators’ ability to meet their obligations to us.

Unfavorable resolution of pending and future litigation matters and disputes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

From time to time, we may be directly involved in a number of legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims. We may also be named as defendants in lawsuits allegedly arising out of our actions or the actions of our operators/tenants or managers in which such operators/tenants or managers have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses. An unfavorable resolution of pending or future litigation may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Regardless of its outcome, litigation may result in substantial costs and expenses and significantly divert the attention of management. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevail in, or achieve a favorable settlement of, pending or future litigation. In addition, pending litigation or future litigation, government proceedings or environmental matters could lead to increased costs or interruption of our normal business operations.

Risk factors related to acquisitions

We are exposed to the risk that some of our acquisitions may not prove to be successful. We could encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities, and acquired properties might require significant management attention that would otherwise be devoted to our ongoing business. If we agree to provide construction funding to an operator/tenant and the project is not completed, we may need to take steps to ensure completion of the project. Such expenditures may negatively affect our results of operations.  Furthermore, there can be no assurance that our anticipated acquisitions and investments, the completion of which is subject to various conditions, will be consummated in accordance with anticipated timing, on anticipated terms, or at all.

Risk factors related to joint ventures

We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, partnerships or joint ventures with other persons or entities. Joint venture investments involve risks that may not be present with other methods of ownership, including the possibility that our partner might become insolvent, refuse to make capital contributions when due or otherwise fail to meet its obligations, which may result in certain liabilities to us for guarantees and other commitments; that our partner might at any time have economic or other business interests or goals that are or become inconsistent with our interests or goals; that we could become engaged in a dispute with our partner, which could require us to expend additional resources to resolve such disputes and could have an adverse impact on the operations and profitability of the joint venture; and that our partner may be in a position to take action or withhold consent contrary to our instructions or requests. In addition, our ability to transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted. In some instances, we and/or our partner may have the right to trigger a buy-sell arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partner’s interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction. Our ability to acquire our partner’s interest may be limited if we do not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources. In such event, we may be forced to sell our interest in the joint venture when we would otherwise prefer to retain it. Joint ventures may require us to share decision-making authority with our partners, which could limit our ability to control the properties in the joint ventures. Even when we have a controlling interest, certain major decisions may require partner approval, such as the sale, acquisition or financing of a property.

Risk factors related to our seniors housing operating properties

We are exposed to various operational risks with respect to our seniors housing operating properties that may increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.  These risks include fluctuations in occupancy, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, if applicable, and private pay rates; economic conditions; competition; federal, state, local, and industry-regulated licensure, certification and inspection laws, regulations, and standards; the availability and increases in cost of general and professional liability insurance coverage; state regulation and rights of residents related to entrance fees; the availability and increases in the cost of labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise).  Any one or a combination of these factors may adversely affect our revenue and operations.

Risk factors related to life science facilities

Our tenants in the life science industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty that may adversely affect their ability to make payments to us. Research, development and clinical testing of products and technologies can be very expensive and sources of funds may not be available to our life science tenants in the future. The products and technologies that are developed and

31


manufactured by our life science tenants may require regulatory approval prior to being made, marketed, sold and used. The regulatory process can be costly, long and unpredictable. Even after a tenant gains regulatory approval and market acceptance, the product still presents regulatory and liability risks, such as safety concerns, competition from new products and eventually the expiration of patent protection. These factors may affect the ability of our life science tenants to make timely payments to us, which may adversely affect our revenue and operations.

Risk factors related to indebtedness

Permanent financing for our investments is typically provided through a combination of public offerings of debt and equity securities and the incurrence or assumption of secured debt. The incurrence or assumption of indebtedness may cause us to become more leveraged, which could (1) require us to dedicate a greater portion of our cash flow to the payment of debt service, (2) make us more vulnerable to a downturn in the economy, (3) limit our ability to obtain additional financing, or (4) negatively affect our credit ratings or outlook by one or more of the rating agencies.

Our debt agreements contain various covenants, restrictions and events of default. Among other things, these provisions require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness, in addition to any other indebtedness cross-defaulted against such instruments. These defaults could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, adverse economic conditions may impact the availability of additional funds or could cause the terms on which we are able to borrow additional funds to become unfavorable. In those circumstances, we may be required to raise additional equity in the capital markets. Our access to capital depends upon a number of factors over which we have little or no control, including rising interest rates, inflation and other general market conditions and the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of the shares of our capital stock. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the capital necessary to make future investments or to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature.

Risk factors related to our credit ratings

We plan to manage the Company to maintain a capital structure consistent with our current profile, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings. Any downgrades in terms of ratings or outlook by any or all of the rating agencies could have a material adverse impact on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.

Risk factors related to swaps

We enter into interest rate swap agreements from time to time to manage some of our exposure to interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate volatility. These swap agreements involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements. In addition, these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates. When we use forward-starting interest rate swaps, there is a risk that we will not complete the long-term borrowing against which the swap is intended to hedge. If such events occur, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Risk factors related to environmental laws

Under various federal and state laws, owners or operators of real estate may be required to respond to the presence or release of hazardous substances on the property and may be held liable for property damage, personal injuries or penalties that result from environmental contamination or exposure to hazardous substances. We may become liable to reimburse the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Generally, such liability attaches to a person based on the person’s relationship to the property. Our tenants or borrowers are primarily responsible for the condition of the property. Moreover, we review environmental site assessments of the properties that we own or encumber prior to taking an interest in them. Those assessments are designed to meet the “all appropriate inquiry” standard, which we believe qualifies us for the innocent purchaser defense if environmental liabilities arise. Based upon such assessments, we do not believe that any of our properties are subject to material environmental contamination. However, environmental liabilities may be present in our properties and we may incur costs to remediate contamination, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition or the business or financial condition of our obligors.

Risk factors related to facilities that require entrance fees

32


Certain of our seniors housing facilities require the payment of an upfront entrance fee by the resident, a portion of which may be refundable by the operator. Some of these facilities are subject to substantial oversight by state regulators relating to these funds. As a result of this oversight, residents of these facilities may have a variety of rights, including, for example, the right to cancel their contracts within a specified period of time and certain lien rights. The oversight and rights of residents within these facilities may have an effect on the revenue or operations of the operators of such facilities and therefore may negatively impact us.

Risk factors related to facilities under construction or development

At any given time, we may be in the process of constructing one or more new facilities that ultimately will require a CON and license before they can be utilized by the operator for their intended use. The operator also may need to obtain Medicare and Medicaid certification and enter into Medicare and Medicaid provider agreements and/or third party payor contracts. In the event that the operator is unable to obtain the necessary CON, licensure, certification, provider agreements or contracts after the completion of construction, there is a risk that we will not be able to earn any revenues on the facility until either the initial operator obtains a license or certification to operate the new facility and the necessary provider agreements or contracts or we find and contract with a new operator that is able to obtain a license to operate the facility for its intended use and the necessary provider agreements or contracts.

In connection with our renovation, redevelopment, development and related construction activities, we may be unable to obtain, or suffer delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations. These factors could result in increased costs or our abandonment of these projects. In addition, we may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, which may render us unable to proceed with our development activities, and we may not be able to complete construction and lease-up of a property on schedule, which could result in increased debt service expense or construction costs.

Additionally, the time frame required for development, construction and lease-up of these properties means that we may have to wait years for significant cash returns. Because we are required to make cash distributions to our stockholders, if the cash flow from operations or refinancing is not sufficient, we may be forced to borrow additional money to fund such distributions. Newly developed and acquired properties may not produce the cash flow that we expect, which could adversely affect our overall financial performance.

In deciding whether to acquire or develop a particular property, we make assumptions regarding the expected future performance of that property. In particular, we estimate the return on our investment based on expected occupancy, rental rates and capital costs. If our financial projections with respect to a new property are inaccurate as a result of increases in capital costs or other factors, the property may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investment. Our estimate of the costs of repositioning or redeveloping an acquired property may prove to be inaccurate, which may result in our failure to meet our profitability goals. Additionally, we may acquire new properties that are not fully leased, and the cash flow from existing operations may be insufficient to pay the operating expenses and debt service associated with that property.

We do not know if our tenants will renew their existing leases, and if they do not, we may be unable to lease the properties on as favorable terms, or at all

We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases at the end of their lease terms, which expire at various times. If these leases are not renewed, we would be required to find other tenants to occupy those properties or sell them. There can be no assurance that we would be able to identify suitable replacement tenants or enter into leases with new tenants on terms as favorable to us as the current leases or that we would be able to lease those properties at all.

Our ownership of properties through ground leases exposes us to the loss of such properties upon breach or termination of the ground leases

We have acquired an interest in certain of our properties by acquiring a leasehold interest in the property on which the building is located, and we may acquire additional properties in the future through the purchase of interests in ground leases. As the lessee under a ground lease, we are exposed to the possibility of losing the property upon termination of the ground lease or an earlier breach of the ground lease by us.

Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our properties in response to changes in economic and other conditions will be limited. No assurances can be given that we will recognize full value for any property that we are required to sell for liquidity reasons. Our inability to respond rapidly to changes in the performance of our investments could

33


adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we are exposed to the risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate, and in particular, the seniors housing and health care industries. A downturn in the real estate industry could adversely affect the value of our properties and our ability to sell properties for a price or on terms acceptable to us.

Risk factors related to reinvestment of sale proceeds

From time to time, we will have cash available from (1) the proceeds of sales of our securities, (2) principal payments on our loans receivable and (3) the sale of properties, including non-elective dispositions, under the terms of master leases or similar financial support arrangements. In order to maintain current revenues and continue generating attractive returns, we expect to re-invest these proceeds in a timely manner. We compete for real estate investments with a broad variety of potential investors. This competition for attractive investments may negatively affect our ability to make timely investments on terms acceptable to us.

Failure to properly manage our rapid growth could distract our management or increase our expenses

We have experienced rapid growth and development in a relatively short period of time and expect to continue this rapid growth in the future. This growth has resulted in increased levels of responsibility for our management. Future property acquisitions could place significant additional demands on, and require us to expand, our management, resources and personnel. Our failure to manage any such rapid growth effectively could harm our business and, in particular, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, which could negatively affect our ability to make distributions to stockholders. Our growth could also increase our capital requirements, which may require us to issue potentially dilutive equity securities and incur additional debt.

Ownership of property outside the United States may subject us to different or greater risks than those associated with our domestic operations

We have operations in Canada and the United Kingdom.  International development, ownership, and operating activities involve risks that are different from those we face with respect to our domestic properties and operations.  These risks include, but are not limited to, any international currency gain recognized with respect to changes in exchange rates may not qualify under the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test that we must satisfy annually in order to qualify and maintain our status as a REIT; challenges with respect to the repatriation of foreign earnings and cash; changes in foreign political, regulatory, and economic conditions, including regionally, nationally, and locally; challenges in managing international operations; challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings; foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries; differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability; and changes in applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations.  If we are unable to successfully manage the risks associated with international expansion and operations, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Risk factors related to changes in currency exchange rates

As we expand our operations internationally, currency exchange rate fluctuations could affect our results of operations and financial position.  We expect to generate an increasing portion of our revenue and expenses in such foreign currencies as the Canadian dollar and the British pound.  Although we may enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions and/or obtain local currency mortgage debt in order to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies, we cannot assure you that foreign currency fluctuations will not have a material adverse effect on us.

We might fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT

We intend to operate as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and believe we have and will continue to operate in such a manner. If we lose our status as a REIT, we will face serious income tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available for satisfying our obligations and for distribution to our stockholders because:

•     we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates;

•     we could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes; and

•     unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.

34


Since REIT qualification requires us to meet a number of complex requirements, it is possible that we may fail to fulfill them, and if we do, our earnings will be reduced by the amount of U.S. federal and other income taxes owed. A reduction in our earnings would affect the amount we could distribute to our stockholders. If we do not qualify as a REIT, we would not be required to make distributions to stockholders since a non-REIT is not required to pay dividends to stockholders in order to maintain REIT status or avoid an excise tax. See “Item 1 — Business — Taxation — Federal Income Tax Considerations” for a discussion of the provisions of the Code that apply to us and the effects of failure to qualify as a REIT.

In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, all distributions to stockholders would continue to be treated as dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, although corporate stockholders may be eligible for the dividends received deduction, and individual stockholders may be eligible for taxation at the rates generally applicable to long-term capital gains (currently at a maximum rate of 20%) with respect to distributions.

As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT also could impair our ability to implement our business strategy and would adversely affect the value of our common stock.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to remain qualified as a REIT. Although we believe that we qualify as a REIT, we cannot assure you that we will continue to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “Item 1 — Business — Taxation — Federal Income Tax Considerations” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The 90% annual distribution requirement will decrease our liquidity and may limit our ability to engage in otherwise beneficial transactions

To comply with the 90% distribution requirement applicable to REITs and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax, we must make distributions to our stockholders. See “Item 1 — Business — Taxation — Federal Income Tax Considerations — Qualification as a REIT — Annual Distribution Requirements” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Although we anticipate that we generally will have sufficient cash or liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement, it is possible that, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirement, or we may decide to retain cash or distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. This may be due to timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, on the one hand, and the inclusion of that income and deduction of those expenses in arriving at our taxable income, on the other hand. In addition, non-deductible expenses such as principal amortization or repayments or capital expenditures in excess of non-cash deductions may cause us to fail to have sufficient cash or liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. In the event that timing differences occur, or we deem it appropriate to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities (although we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so), pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in another transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements. This may require us to raise additional capital to meet our obligations.

The lease of qualified health care properties to a taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to special requirements

We lease certain qualified health care properties to taxable REIT subsidiaries (or limited liability companies of which the taxable REIT subsidiaries are members), which lessees contract with managers (or related parties) to manage the health care operations at these properties.  The rents from this taxable REIT subsidiary lessee structure are treated as qualifying rents from real property if (1) they are paid pursuant to an arms-length lease of a qualified health care property with a taxable REIT subsidiary and (2) the manager qualifies as an eligible independent contractor (as defined in the Code).  If any of these conditions are not satisfied, then the rents will not be qualifying rents.  See “Item 1 — Business — Taxation — Federal Income Tax Considerations — Qualification as a REIT — Income Tests.”

If certain sale-leaseback transactions are not characterized by the Internal Revenue Service as “true leases,” we may be subject to adverse tax consequences

We have purchased certain properties and leased them back to the sellers of such properties, and we may enter into similar transactions in the future. We intend for any such sale-leaseback transaction to be structured in such a manner that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease,” thereby allowing us to be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, depending on the terms of any specific transaction, the Internal Revenue Service might take the position that the transaction is not a “true lease” but is more properly treated in some other manner. In the event any sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and successfully re-characterized by the Internal Revenue Service, we would not be entitled to claim the deductions for depreciation and

35


cost recovery generally available to an owner of property. Furthermore, if a sale-leaseback transaction were so re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT asset tests or income tests and, consequently, could lose our REIT status effective with the year of re-characterization.  See “Item 1 — Business — Taxation — Federal Income Tax Considerations — Qualification as a REIT — Asset Tests” and “— Income Tests.” Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated, which may cause us to fail to meet the REIT annual distribution requirements for a taxable year.  See “Item 1 — Business — Taxation — Federal Income Tax Considerations — Qualification as a REIT — Annual Distribution Requirements.”

Other risk factors

We are also subject to other risks. First, our certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain anti-takeover provisions (restrictions on share ownership and transfer and super majority stockholder approval requirements for business combinations) that could make it more difficult for or even prevent a third party from acquiring us without the approval of our incumbent Board of Directors. Provisions and agreements that inhibit or discourage takeover attempts could reduce the market value of our common stock.

Additionally, we are dependent on key personnel. Although we have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers, losing any one of them could, at least temporarily, have an adverse impact on our operations. We believe that losing more than one could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

36


Item 2. Properties

We own our corporate headquarters located at 4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615. We also own corporate offices in Tennessee, lease corporate offices in Florida and California and have ground leases relating to certain of our properties. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the properties that comprise our consolidated real property and real estate loan investments as of December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Seniors Housing Triple-Net

Seniors Housing Operating

Property Location

Number of Properties

Total Investment

Annualized Revenues (1)

Number of Properties

Total Investment

Annualized Revenues (1)

Alabama

2

$

20,922

$

1,688

2

$

33,059

$

5,494

Arizona

2

14,287

1,364

4

43,930

16,143

California

3

31,144

4,296

40

1,095,637

268,985

Colorado

4

85,485

9,771

2

59,281

17,414

Connecticut

23

215,401

22,354

14

340,487

101,889

Delaware

10

157,444

15,741

-

-

-

Florida

39

630,924

50,877

1

5,706

4,366

Georgia

7

148,727

10,068

5

42,996

20,149

Idaho

1

17,253

1,970

-

-

-

Illinois

13

293,843

25,015

5

287,632

45,930

Indiana

18

249,678

24,969

-

-

-

Iowa

3

49,559

3,868

1

36,109

5,729

Kansas

8

158,640

15,494

2

52,492

10,515

Kentucky

11

66,869

8,764

1

23,099

6,416

Louisiana

1

4,914

1,376

-

-

-

Maine

-

-

-

1

25,884

5,269

Maryland

27

409,017

35,300

-

-

-

Massachusetts

34

451,096

53,093

13

319,158

83,638

Michigan

8

117,961

9,982

-

-

-

Minnesota

3

38,769

4,117

1

26,297

6,875

Mississippi

3

32,734

3,280

-

-

-

Missouri

2

30,470

2,790

2

71,148

9,562

Montana

1

6,914

1,366

-

-

-

Nebraska

4

37,170

4,067

-

-

-

Nevada

2

68,255

7,483

2

34,233

8,664

New Hampshire

12

185,972

19,868

2

51,208

10,103

New Jersey

56

1,215,282

96,180

-

-

-

New Mexico

-

-

-

1

20,102

1,375

New York

9

212,913

16,177

-

-

-

North Carolina

45

272,994

29,218

-

-

-

Ohio

28

239,641

32,809

3

191,366

13,233

Oklahoma

16

115,027

13,494

2

39,856

2,166

Oregon

1

3,643

733

-

-

-

Pennsylvania

45

803,478

81,401

-

-

-

Rhode Island

3

47,576

5,001

3

73,594

21,656

South Carolina

8

274,269

14,502

-

-

-

Tennessee

25

201,670

25,380

2

55,093

15,379

Texas

39

369,178

55,205

12

267,899

66,923

Utah

1

6,226

887

1

17,877

9,828

Vermont

2

27,728

2,917

1

29,373

6,172

Virginia

7

95,018

9,752

-

580,834 (2)

30,261 (2)

Washington

7

121,856

12,517

18

537,028

83,980

West Virginia

24

391,682

41,102

-

-

-

Wisconsin

15

195,883

19,913

-

-

-

Total domestic

572

8,117,512

796,149

141

4,361,378

878,114

International

1

37,138

673

13

587,158

76,434

Total

573

$

8,154,650

$

796,822

154

$

4,948,536

$

954,548

(1) Reflects annualized revenues adjusted for timing of investment.

(2) Amounts represent loan and related interest income for loan to Sunrise Senior Living that was acquired upon merger consummation on January 9, 2013. See Notes 6 and 21 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

37


Medical Facilities

Property Location

Number of Properties

Total Investment

Annualized Revenues (1)

Alabama

3

$

33,842

$

4,467

Alaska

1

24,996

3,309

Arizona

4

78,379

9,554

Arkansas

1

28,238

2,836

California

16

508,627

56,676

Colorado

1

6,008

622

Florida

41

548,568

52,370

Georgia

11

190,250

22,004

Idaho

1

19,288

2,677

Illinois

3

28,369

4,863

Indiana

7

136,101

15,732

Kansas

5

45,450

8,154

Kentucky

1

27,583

3,172

Louisiana

2

20,111

1,814

Maine

1

25,172

2,933

Maryland

1

21,119

69

Massachusetts

1

9,270

4,249

Minnesota

5

100,419

13,619

Missouri

6

156,078

14,099

Nebraska

3

149,739

16,885

Nevada

6

72,865

6,410

New Jersey

8

279,849

46,813

New Mexico

3

39,271

3,198

New York

8

89,684

9,520

North Carolina

10

55,385

5,930

Ohio

10

100,298

10,493

Oklahoma

2

17,475

2,344

Oregon

1

766

-

Pennsylvania

1

18,714

3,286

Tennessee

8

97,935

9,494

Texas

47

870,139

78,499

Virginia

4

68,400

6,327

Washington

5

149,070

7,804

Wisconsin

19

302,365

30,112

Total

246

$

4,319,823

$

460,334

(1) Reflects annualized revenues adjusted for timing of investment.

The following table sets forth occupancy, coverages and average annualized revenues for certain property types (excluding investments in unconsolidated entities):

Occupancy (1)

Coverages (1,2)

Average Annualized Revenues (3)

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

Seniors housing triple-net (4)

89.9%

88.2%

1.34x

1.38x

$

14,509

$

15,001

per unit

Skilled nursing/post-acute (4)

87.4%

88.0%

1.75x

2.22x

11,681

9,954

per bed

Seniors housing operating (5)

92.3%

90.1%

n/a

n/a

54,183

47,432

per unit

Hospitals (4)

60.3%

59.0%

2.40x

2.47x

49,244

43,929

per bed

Medical office buildings (6)

94.4%

93.4%

n/a

n/a

28

27

per sq. ft.

(1) We use unaudited, periodic financial information provided solely by tenants/borrowers to calculate occupancy and coverages for properties other than medical office buildings and have not independently verified the information.

(2) Represents the ratio of our triple-net customers' earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees to contractual rent or interest due us. Data reflects the 12 months ended September 30 for the periods presented.

(3) Represents annualized revenues divided by total beds, units or square feet as presented in the tables above.

(4) Occupancy represents average quarterly operating occupancy based on the quarters ended September 30 and excludes properties that are unstabilized, closed or for which data is not available or meaningful.

(5) Occupancy for seniors housing operating represents average occupancy for the three months ended December 31.

(6) Medical office building occupancy represents the percentage of total rentable square feet leased and occupied (including month-to-month and holdover leases and excluding terminations and discontinued operations) as of December 31.

38


The following table sets forth information regarding lease expirations for certain portions of our portfolio as of December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Expiration Year

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Thereafter

Seniors housing triple-net:

Properties

18

15

1

-

34

51

-

12

55

10

357

Base rent (1)

$

13,437

$

25,900

$

4,669

$

-

$

15,594

$

37,194

$

-

$

14,944

$

60,927

$

12,817

$

566,733

% of base rent

1.8%

3.4%

0.6%

0.0%

2.1%

4.9%

0.0%

2.0%

8.1%

1.7%

77.1%

Hospitals:

Properties

-

-

-

-

3

-

-

-

-

-

23

Base rent (1)

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

2,350

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

77,818

% of base rent

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

2.9%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

97.1%

Medical office buildings:

Square feet

600,865

641,228

724,578

752,263

1,073,659

693,746

652,059

693,517

823,656

1,944,163

3,091,420

Base rent (1)

$

25,283

$

13,384

$

15,806

$

16,413

$

25,464

$

14,679

$

15,096

$

15,650

$

20,233

$

38,860

$

77,721

% of base rent

9.1%

4.8%

5.7%

5.9%

9.1%

5.3%

5.4%

5.6%

7.3%

13.9%

27.9%

(1) The most recent monthly base rent including straight line for leases with fixed escalators or annual cash rents with contingent escalators.  Base rent does not include tenant recoveries or amortization of above and below market lease intangibles.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, there are various legal proceedings pending to which we are a party or to which some of our properties are subject arising in the normal course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, we entered into a merger agreement with Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (“Sunrise”). Following the announcement of the merger agreement, complaints were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and the Chancery Court for the State of Delaware challenging the merger. The complaints challenge the merger on behalf of a putative class of Sunrise public stockholders, and name as defendants Sunrise, its directors and us. The complaints generally allege that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the merger and that the entity defendants aided and abetted that breach. The complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia additionally alleges that the preliminary proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Sunrise fails to provide material information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder.  The complaints seek, among other things, injunctive relief against the merger, unspecified damages and an award of plaintiffs’ expenses, including attorneys’ fees. On December 5, 2012, the parties executed a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) that provisionally settles the lawsuits subject to a number of conditions.  On January 17, 2013, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Stay the Proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia based upon the MOU and, on January 23, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia entered an order staying the proceedings for six (6) months as the parties complete the settlement process.  On February 11, 2013, the parties filed a [Proposed] Order Staying All Proceedings in the Chancery Court for the State of Delaware and, on February 13, 2013, the Chancery Court for the State of Delaware entered an order staying the proceedings pending the completion of the settlement process in the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.  On January 9, 2013, we completed our acquisition of the Sunrise property portfolio. Please see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

39


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

There were 4,936 stockholders of record as of January 31, 2013. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:HCN), and common dividends paid per share:

Sales Price

Dividends

High

Low

Paid

2012

First Quarter

$

57.66

$

53.26

$

0.740

Second Quarter

58.34

52.40

0.740

Third Quarter

62.80

56.48

0.740

Fourth Quarter

61.33

56.88

0.740

2011

First Quarter

$

52.74

$

46.75

$

0.690

Second Quarter

55.21

49.79

0.715

Third Quarter

54.63

41.03

0.715

Fourth Quarter

55.17

43.65

0.715

Our Board of Directors has approved a new quarterly cash dividend rate of $0.765 per share of common stock per quarter, commencing with the February 2013 dividend. The declaration and payment of quarterly dividends remains subject to the review and approval of the Board of Directors.

Stockholder Return Performance Presentation

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change and the cumulative total stockholder return on our shares of common stock against the cumulative total return of the S & P Composite-500 Stock Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Index. As of December 31, 2012, 126 companies comprised the FTSE NAREIT Equity Index. The Index consists of REITs identified by NAREIT as equity (those REITs which have at least 75% of their investments in real property). The data are based on the closing prices as of December 31 for each of the five years. 2007 equals $100 and dividends are assumed to be reinvested.

12/31/07

12/31/08

12/31/09

12/31/10

12/31/11

12/31/12

S & P 500

100.00

63.00

79.68

91.68

93.61

108.59

Health Care REIT, Inc.

100.00

100.30

113.19

129.42

156.94

185.53

FTSE NAREIT Equity

100.00

62.27

79.70

101.98

110.42

132.18

Except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, the foregoing Stockholder Return Performance Presentation shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This information shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period

Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)

Average Price Paid Per Share

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)

Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

October 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012

-

$

-

November 1, 2012 through November 30, 2012

5,804

59.37

December 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012

-

-

Totals

5,804

$

59.37

(1) During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the company acquired shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

(2) No shares were purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs.

40


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data for the five years ended December 31, 2012 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements (in thousands, except per share data):

Year Ended December 31,

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Operating Data

Revenues (1)

$

407,458

$

445,564

$

578,571

$

1,330,060

$

1,822,099

Expenses (1)

313,044

337,628

542,071

1,217,450

1,636,446

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and income from unconsolidated entities

94,414

107,936

36,500

112,610

185,653

Income tax expense

(1,306)

(168)

(364)

(1,388)

(7,612)

Income from unconsolidated entities

-

-

6,673

5,772

2,482

Income from continuing operations

93,108

107,768

42,809

116,994

180,523

Income from discontinued operations, net (1)

190,317

85,159

86,075

95,722

114,317

Net income

283,425

192,927

128,884

212,716

294,840

Preferred stock dividends

23,201

22,079

21,645

60,502

69,129

Preferred stock redemption charge

-

-

-

-

6,242

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

126

(342)

357

(4,894)

(2,415)

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

260,098

$

171,190

$

106,882

$

157,108

$

221,884

Other Data

Average number of common shares outstanding:

Basic

93,732

114,207

127,656

173,741

224,343

Diluted

94,309

114,612

128,208

174,401

225,953

Per Share Data

Basic:

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders

$

0.74

$

0.75

$

0.16

$

0.35

$

0.48

Discontinued operations, net

2.03

0.75

0.67

0.55

0.51

Net income attributable to common stockholders *

$

2.77

$

1.50

$

0.84

$

0.90

$

0.99

Diluted:

Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders

$

0.74

$

0.75

$

0.16

$

0.35

$

0.48

Discontinued operations, net

2.02

0.74

0.67

0.55

0.51

Net income attributable to common stockholders *

$

2.76

$

1.49

$

0.83

$

0.90

$

0.98

Cash distributions per common share

$

2.70

$

2.72

$

2.74

$

2.835

$

2.960

* Amounts may not sum due to rounding

(1) We have reclassified the income and expenses attributable to properties sold prior to or held for sale at December 31, 2012, to discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

December 31,

Balance Sheet Data

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Net real estate investments

$

5,854,179

$

6,080,620

$

8,590,833

$

13,942,350

$

17,423,009

Total assets

6,215,031

6,367,186

9,451,734

14,924,606

19,549,109

Total long-term obligations

2,847,676

2,414,022

4,469,736

7,240,752

8,531,899

Total liabilities

2,976,746

2,559,735

4,714,081

7,612,309

8,993,998

Total preferred stock

289,929

288,683

291,667

1,010,417

1,022,917

Total equity

3,238,285

3,807,451

4,733,100

7,278,647

10,520,519

41


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Company Overview

Business Strategy

Capital Market Outlook

Key Transactions in 2012

Key Performance Indicators, Trends and Uncertainties

Corporate Governance

43

43

44

44

45

47

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources and Uses of Cash

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Contractual Obligations

Capital Structure

47

48

48

49

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary

Seniors Housing Triple-net

Senior Housing Operating

Medical Facilities

Non-Segment/Corporate

51

52

54

56

58

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES & OTHER

FFO Reconciliation

Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation

NOI Reconciliation

59

61

62

Health Care Industry

64

Critical Accounting Policies

67

42


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of Health Care REIT, Inc. for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other important factors are identified in “Item 1 — Business” and “Item 1A — Risk Factors” above.

Executive Summary

Company Overview

Health Care REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that has been at the forefront of seniors housing and health care real estate since the company was founded in 1970.  We are an S&P 500 company headquartered in Toledo, Ohio. Our portfolio spans the full spectrum of seniors housing and health care real estate, including seniors housing communities, skilled nursing/post-acute facilities, medical office buildings, inpatient and outpatient medical centers and life science facilities. Our capital programs, when combined with comprehensive planning, development and property management services, make us a single-source solution for acquiring, planning, developing, managing, repositioning and monetizing real estate assets.

The following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio as of December 31, 2012:

Investments

Percentage of

Number of

Type of Property

(in thousands)

Investments

Properties

Seniors housing triple-net

$

8,154,650

46.8%

573

Seniors housing operating (1)

4,948,536

28.4%

154

Medical facilities (2)

4,319,823

24.8%

246

Totals

$

17,423,009

100.0%

973

(1) Excludes 39 properties with an investment amount of $427,187,000 which relates to our share of investments in unconsolidated entities with Chartwell. Please see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

(2) Excludes 13 properties with an investment amount of $375,780,000 which relates to our share of investments in unconsolidated entities with Forest City and a strategic medical partnership. Please see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Business Strategy

Our primary objectives are to protect stockholder capital and enhance stockholder value. We seek to pay consistent cash dividends to stockholders and create opportunities to increase dividend payments to stockholders as a result of annual increases in net operating income and portfolio growth. To meet these objectives, we invest across the full spectrum of seniors housing and health care real estate and diversify our investment portfolio by property type, customer and geographic location.

Substantially all of our revenues are derived from operating lease rentals, resident fees and services, and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable. These items represent our primary sources of liquidity to fund distributions and depend upon the continued ability of our obligors to make contractual rent and interest payments to us and the profitability of our operating properties. To the extent that our customers/partners experience operating difficulties and become unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments to us, there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. To mitigate this risk, we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property. Our proactive and comprehensive asset management process for seniors housing properties generally includes review of monthly financial statements and other operating data for each property, review of obligor/partner creditworthiness, property inspections, and review of covenant compliance relating to licensure, real estate taxes, letters of credit and other collateral. Our internal property management division actively manages and monitors the medical office building portfolio with a comprehensive process including tenant relations, lease expirations, the mix of health service providers, hospital/health system relationships, property performance, capital improvement needs, and market conditions among other things. In monitoring our portfolio, our personnel use a proprietary database to collect and analyze property-specific data. Additionally, we conduct extensive research to ascertain industry trends.  We evaluate the operating environment in each property’s market to determine the likely trend in operating performance of the facility.  When we identify unacceptable trends, we seek to mitigate, eliminate or transfer the risk. Through these efforts, we are generally able to intervene at an early stage to address any negative trends, and in so doing, support both the collectability of revenue and the value of our investment.

In addition to our asset management and research efforts, we also structure our investments to help mitigate payment risk. Operating leases and loans are normally credit enhanced by guaranties and/or letters of credit. In addition, operating leases are typically structured as master leases and loans are generally cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized with other real estate loans, operating leases or agreements between us and the obligor and its affiliates.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, rental income, resident fees and services and interest and other income represented 61%, 37%, and 2% respectively, of total revenues (including discontinued operations).  Substantially all of our operating leases are designed

43


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

with escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. Our yield on loans receivable depends upon a number of factors, including the stated interest rate, the average principal amount outstanding during the term of the loan and any interest rate adjustments.

Our primary sources of cash include rent and interest receipts, resident fees and services, borrowings under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, public issuances of debt and equity securities, proceeds from investment dispositions and principal payments on loans receivable. Our primary uses of cash include dividend distributions, debt service payments (including principal and interest), real property investments (including acquisitions, capital expenditures, construction advances and transaction costs), loan advances, property operating expenses and general and administrative expenses.  Depending upon the availability and cost of external capital, we believe our liquidity is sufficient to fund these uses of cash.

We also continuously evaluate opportunities to finance future investments.  New investments are generally funded from temporary borrowings under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, internally generated cash and the proceeds from investment dispositions. Our investments generate cash from net operating income and principal payments on loans receivable. Permanent financing for future investments, which replaces funds drawn under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, has historically been provided through a combination of the issuance of public debt and equity securities and the incurrence or assumption of secured debt.

Depending upon market conditions, we believe that new investments will be available in the future with spreads over our cost of capital that will generate appropriate returns to our stockholders. It is also possible that investment dispositions may occur in the future. To the extent that investment dispositions exceed new investments, our revenues and cash flows from operations could be adversely affected. We expect to reinvest the proceeds from any investment dispositions in new investments. To the extent that new investment requirements exceed our available cash on-hand, we expect to borrow under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement. At December 31, 2012, we had $1.0 billion of cash and cash equivalents, $107.7 million of restricted cash and $2.0 billion of available borrowing capacity under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement.  Please see Note 21 of our consolidated financial statements for information regarding subsequent events that impact our liquidity.

Capital Market Outlook

The capital markets remain supportive of our investment strategy. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we raised over $6.0 billion in aggregate gross proceeds through issuance of common and preferred stock, unsecured debt and a Canadian denominated term loan. The capital raised, in combination with available cash and borrowing capacity under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, supported $4.9 billion in gross new investments for the year. We expect attractive investment opportunities to remain available in the future as we continue to leverage the benefits of our relationship investment strategy.

Key Transactions in 2012

We completed the following capital transactions during the year ended December 31, 2012:

· issued 64.4 million shares of common stock, generating $3.4 billion of proceeds in three public issuances;

· raised $120.4 million in proceeds from issuance of 2.1 million shares of common stock under our DRIP;

· issued 11.5 million shares of 6.5% preferred stock, generating $287.5 million of proceeds, and redeemed $275 million of 7.716% preferred stock;

· issued $1.8 billion of senior unsecured notes with average rates of 3.7% and average terms of 10.5 years;

· funded $250 million Canadian denominated unsecured term loan to help hedge our Chartwell investment;

· completed the redemption/conversion of $293.7 million of 4.75% convertible senior unsecured notes; and

· extinguished $360 million of secured debt bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 4.67%.

We completed $4.9 billion of gross investments during the year, including 76% from existing relationships.  The following summarizes investments made during the year ended December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

44


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Properties

Investment Amount (1)

Capitalization Rates (2)

Book Amount (3)

Acquisitions/JVs:

Seniors housing triple-net

51

$

1,068,123

7.3%

$

1,071,438

Seniors housing operating

80

2,029,109

6.7%

1,840,524

Medical facilities

35

791,279

6.9%

837,705

Total acquisitions/JVs

166

3,888,511

7.0%

3,749,667

Construction in progress

314,514

314,514

Loan advances (4)

665,094

665,094

Total

$

4,868,119

$

4,729,275

(1) Represents stated purchase price including cash and any assumed debt but excludes fair value adjustments pursuant to U.S. GAAP.

(2) Represents annualized contractual or projected income to be received in cash divided by investment amounts.

(3) Represents amounts recorded on our books including fair value adjustments pursuant to U.S. GAAP.  See Notes 3, 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

(4) Includes $580,834,000 in advances under the Sunrise loan which was acquired upon merger consummation on January 9, 2013. See Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

We completed $534 million of dispositions during the year, generating $635 million in proceeds and $101 million in net gains.  The following summarizes dispositions made during the year ended December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Properties

Proceeds (1)

Capitalization Rates (2)

Book Amount (3)

Property sales:

Seniors housing triple-net

73

$

489,216

8.5%

$

372,378

Seniors housing operating

-

-

0.0%

-

Medical facilities

18

133,055

9.9%

149,344

Total property sales

91

622,271

8.8%

521,722

Loan payoffs

5

12,555

12,555

Total dispositions

96

$

634,826

$

534,277

(1) Represents proceeds received upon disposition including any seller financing. See Notes 5 and 6 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

(2) Represents annualized contractual income that was being received in cash at date of disposition divided by disposition proceeds.

(3) Represents carrying value of assets at time of disposition.

The following other events occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012 :

· Our Board of Directors increased the annual cash dividend to $3.06 per common share ($0.765 per share quarterly), as compared to $2.96 per common share for 2012, beginning in February 2013.  The dividend declared for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 represents the 167 th consecutive quarterly dividend payment.

· We declassified our Board of Directors in May.

Key Performance Indicators, Trends and Uncertainties

We utilize several key performance indicators to evaluate the various aspects of our business. These indicators are discussed below and relate to operating performance, credit strength  and concentration risk.  Management uses these key performance indicators to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results, in making operating decisions and for budget planning purposes.

Operating Performance . We believe that net income attributable to common stockholders (“NICS”) is the most appropriate earnings measure. Other useful supplemental measures of our operating performance include funds from operations (“FFO”), net operating income from continuing operations (“NOI”) and same store cash NOI (“SSCNOI”); however, these supplemental measures are not defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). Please refer to the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further discussion and reconciliations of FFO, NOI and SSCNOI. These earnings measures and their relative per share amounts are widely used by investors and analysts in the valuation, comparison and investment recommendations of companies. The following table reflects the recent historical trends of our operating performance measures for the periods presented (in thousands):

45


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31,

2010

2011

2012

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

106,882

$

157,108

$

221,884

Funds from operations

280,022

524,902

697,557

Net operating income from continuing operations

500,784

952,321

1,251,982

Same store cash net operating income

322,691

331,999

334,077

Credit Strength. We measure our credit strength both in terms of leverage ratios and coverage ratios. The leverage ratios indicate how much of our balance sheet capitalization is related to long-term debt. The coverage ratios indicate our ability to service interest and fixed charges (interest, secured debt principal amortization and preferred dividends). We expect to maintain capitalization ratios and coverage ratios sufficient to maintain compliance with our debt covenants. The coverage ratios are based on adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) which is discussed in further detail, and reconciled to net income, below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Leverage ratios and coverage ratios are widely used by investors, analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, investment recommendations and rating of companies. The following table reflects the recent historical trends for our credit strength measures for the periods presented:

Year Ended December 31,

2010

2011

2012

Debt to book capitalization ratio

49%

50%

45%

Debt to undepreciated book capitalization ratio

45%

46%

41%

Debt to market capitalization ratio

38%

38%

33%

Adjusted interest coverage ratio

3.39x

3.02x

3.31x

Adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio

2.76x

2.37x

2.58x

Concentration Risk . We evaluate our concentration risk in terms of asset mix, investment mix, customer mix and geographic mix. Concentration risk is a valuable measure in understanding what portion of our investments could be at risk if certain sectors were to experience downturns. Asset mix measures the portion of our investments that are real property. In order to qualify as an equity REIT, at least 75% of our real estate investments must be real property whereby each property, which includes the land, buildings, improvements, intangibles and related rights, is owned by us. Investment mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our various property types. Customer mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our top five customers. Geographic mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our top five states (or international equivalents). The following table reflects our recent historical trends of concentration risk by investment balance for the periods presented:

46


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31,

2010

2011

2012

Asset mix:

Real property

91%

95%

91%

Real estate loans receivable

5%

2%

5%

Investments in unconsolidated entities

4%

3%

4%

Investment mix: (1)

Seniors housing triple-net

53%

54%

47%

Seniors housing operating

13%

20%

28%

Medical facilities

34%

26%

25%

Customer mix: (1)

Genesis HealthCare, LLC

18%

15%

Sunrise Senior Living Inc.

6%

Merrill Gardens L.L.C.

9%

8%

6%

Belmont Village, LP

5%

Benchmark Senior Living, LLC

6%

5%

Brandywine Senior Living, LLC

7%

5%

Senior Living Communities, LLC

7%

4%

Senior Star Living

5%

Brookdale Senior Living Inc.

4%

Remaining customers

68%

59%

63%

Geographic mix: (1)

California

10%

10%

9%

Texas

8%

7%

9%

New Jersey

10%

9%

Florida

11%

7%

7%

Pennsylvania

5%

Massachusetts

6%

Washington

6%

Ohio

6%

Remaining

59%

60%

61%

(1) Excludes our share of investments in unconsolidated entities.

We evaluate our key performance indicators in conjunction with current expectations to determine if historical trends are indicative of future results. Our expected results may not be achieved and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. Factors that may cause actual results to differ from expected results are described in more detail in “Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors” and other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management regularly monitors economic and other factors to develop strategic and tactical plans designed to improve performance and maximize our competitive position. Our ability to achieve our financial objectives is dependent upon our ability to effectively execute these plans and to appropriately respond to emerging economic and company-specific trends. Please refer to “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of these risk factors.

Corporate Governance

Maintaining investor confidence and trust has become is important in today’s business environment. Our Board of Directors and management are strongly committed to policies and procedures that reflect the highest level of ethical business practices. Our corporate governance guidelines provide the framework for our business operations and emphasize our commitment to increase stockholder value while meeting all applicable legal requirements. These guidelines meet the listing standards adopted by the New York Stock Exchange and are available on the Internet at www.hcreit.com.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our primary sources of cash include rent and interest receipts, resident fees and services, borrowings under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, public issuances of debt and equity securities, proceeds from investment dispositions and principal

47


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

payments on loans receivable. Our primary uses of cash include dividend distributions, debt service payments (including principal and interest), real property investments (including acquisitions, capital expenditures, construction advances and transaction costs), loan advances, property operating expenses, and general and administrative expenses. These sources and uses of cash are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and are discussed in further detail below.  The following is a summary of our sources and uses of cash flows (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December, 31

December, 31

December, 31

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

Beginning cash and cash equivalents

$

35,476

$

131,570

$

96,094

271%

$

163,482

$

31,912

24%

$

128,006

361%

Cash provided from (used in):

Operating activities

364,741

588,224

223,483

61%

818,133

229,909

39%

453,392

124%

Investing activities

(2,312,039)

(4,520,129)

(2,208,090)

96%

(3,592,979)

927,150

-21%

(1,280,940)

55%

Financing activities

2,043,392

3,963,817

1,920,425

94%

3,645,128

(318,689)

-8%

1,601,736

78%

Ending cash and cash equivalents

$

131,570

$

163,482

$

31,912

24%

$

1,033,764

$

870,282

532%

$

902,194

686%

Operating Activities . The change in net cash provided from operating activities is primarily attributable to increases in NOI which is primarily due to acquisitions.  Please see “Results of Operations” for further discussion.

Investing Activities .  The changes in net cash used in investing activities are primarily attributable to net changes in real property investments, real estate loans receivable and investments in unconsolidated entities which are summarized above in “Key Transactions in 2012.”  Please refer to Notes 3, 6 and 7 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Financing Activities . The changes in net cash provided from financing activities are primarily attributable to changes related to our long-term debt arrangements, the issuance/redemptions of common and preferred stock, and dividend payments which are summarized above in “Key Transactions in 2012.”  Please refer to Notes 9, 10 and 13 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Subsequent Events . Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we closed on a new unsecured line of credit arrangement and completed our acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.  Please refer to Note 21 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 2012, we had investments in unconsolidated entities with our ownership ranging from 10% to 50%. Please see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.  We use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. Please see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.  At December 31, 2012, we had nine outstanding letter of credit obligations. Please see Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our payment requirements under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

Total

2013

2014-2015

2016-2017

Thereafter

Unsecured line of credit arrangements

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

Senior unsecured notes (1)

6,145,457

300,000

501,054

1,150,000

4,194,403

Secured debt (1)

2,728,500

175,652

590,095

765,624

1,197,129

Contractual interest obligations

3,601,325

411,053

756,197

607,765

1,826,310

Capital lease obligations

85,853

73,562

10,203

1,118

970

Operating lease obligations

699,990

11,046

22,339

22,348

644,257

Purchase obligations

2,340,618

2,221,934

118,684

-

-

Other long-term liabilities

6,522

-

1,580

2,463

2,479

Total contractual obligations

$

15,608,265

$

3,193,247

$

2,000,152

$

2,549,318

$

7,865,548

(1) Amounts represent principal amounts due and do not reflect unamortized premiums/discounts or other fair value adjustments as reflected on the balance sheet.

48


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

At December 31, 2012, we had a $2,000,000,000 unsecured line of credit arrangement that is described in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements.  At December 31, 2012, we had no balance outstanding under the unsecured line of credit arrangement.  Please see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements for subsequent event information regarding our unsecured line of credit arrangement.

We have $6,145,457,000 of senior unsecured notes principal outstanding with fixed annual interest rates ranging from 2.25% to 6.50%, payable semi-annually. A total of $494,403,000 of our senior unsecured notes are convertible notes that also contain put features.   Please see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.   In addition, we have a $250,000,000 Canadian denominated unsecured term loan (approximately $251,054,000 USD at exchange rates on December 31, 2012.)  The loan matures on July 27, 2015 and includes an option to extend for an additional year at our discretion.  Total contractual interest obligations on senior unsecured notes and the Canadian term loan totaled $2,777,745,000 at December 31, 2012.

We have consolidated secured debt with total outstanding principal of $2,311,586,000, collateralized by owned properties, with annual interest rates ranging from 1.00% to 10.00%, payable monthly. The carrying values of the properties securing the debt totaled $3,953,516,000 at December 31, 2012. Total contractual interest obligations on consolidated secured debt totaled $757,025,000 at December 31, 2012. Our share of non-recourse secured debt associated with unconsolidated entities (as reflected in the contractual obligations table above) is $416,914,000 at December 31, 2012.  Our share of contractual interest obligations on our unconsolidated entities’ secured debt is $66,555,000 at December 31, 2012.

At December 31, 2012, we had operating lease obligations of $699,990,000 relating primarily to ground leases at certain of our properties and office space leases and capital lease obligations of $85,853,000 relating to certain lease investment properties that contain bargain purchase options.

Purchase obligations include $2,047,400,000 representing the cash portion of the Sunrise merger and management business sale commitments discussed in Note 21 to our audited financial statements.  Purchase obligations also include unfunded construction commitments and contingent purchase obligations. At December 31, 2012, we had outstanding construction financings of $162,984,000 for leased properties and were committed to providing additional financing of approximately $213,255,000 to complete construction. At December 31, 2012, we had contingent purchase obligations totaling $79,963,000. These contingent purchase obligations relate to unfunded capital improvement obligations and contingent obligations on acquisitions. Upon funding, amounts due from the tenant are increased to reflect the additional investment in the property.

Other long-term liabilities relate to our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which is discussed in Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements.

Capital Structure

As of December 31, 2012, we had total equity of $10,520,519,000 and a total debt balance of $8,450,347,000, which represents a debt to total book capitalization ratio of 45%. Our ratio of debt to market capitalization was 33% at December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2012, our adjusted interest coverage ratio was 3.31x and our adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.58x. Also, at December 31, 2012, we had $1,033,764,000 of cash and cash equivalents, $107,657,000 of restricted cash and $2,000,000,000 of available borrowing capacity under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement.

Our debt agreements contain various covenants, restrictions and events of default. Certain agreements require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements. Please refer to the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further discussion. None of our debt agreements contain provisions for acceleration which could be triggered by our debt ratings. However, under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement, the ratings on our senior unsecured notes are used to determine the fees and interest charged.  A summary of certain covenants and our results as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:

49


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Per Agreement

Covenant

Unsecured Line of Credit (1)

Senior Unsecured Notes

Actual At December 31, 2012

Total Indebtedness to Book Capitalization Ratio maximum:

60%

n/a

45%

Secured Indebtedness to Total Assets Ratio maximum:

30%

40%

12%

Total Indebtedness to Total Assets maximum:

n/a

60%

44%

Unsecured Debt to Unencumbered Assets maximum:

60%

n/a

38%

Adjusted Interest Coverage Ratio minimum:

n/a

1.50x

3.31x

Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage minimum:

1.50x

n/a

2.58x

(1) Canadian denominated term loan covenants are the same as those contained in our primary unsecured line of credit agreement.

We plan to manage the company to maintain compliance with our debt covenants and with a capital structure consistent with our current profile. Any downgrades in terms of ratings or outlook by any or all of the rating agencies could have a material adverse impact on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.

On May 4, 2012, we filed an open-ended automatic or “universal” shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering an indeterminate amount of future offerings of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants and units. As of January 31, 2013, we had an effective registration statement on file in connection with our enhanced dividend reinvestment plan under which we may issue up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock. As of January 31, 2013, 3,752,914 shares of common stock remained available for issuance under this registration statement. We have entered into separate Equity Distribution Agreements with each of UBS Securities LLC, RBS Securities Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc. relating to the offer and sale from time to time of up to $630,015,000 aggregate amount of our common stock (“Equity Shelf Program”). As of January 31, 2013, we had $457,112,000 of remaining capacity under the Equity Shelf Program. Depending upon market conditions, we anticipate issuing securities under our registration statements to invest in additional properties and to repay borrowings under our unsecured line of credit arrangements.

50


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

Our primary sources of revenue include rent, resident fees and services, and interest income. Our primary expenses include interest expense, depreciation and amortization, property operating expenses, transaction costs and general and administrative expenses. These revenues and expenses are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and are discussed in further detail below. The following is a summary of our results of operations (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

Amount

%

2012

Amount

%

Amount

%

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

106,882

$

157,108

$

50,226

47%

$

221,884

$

64,776

41%

$

115,002

108%

Funds from operations

280,022

524,902

244,880

87%

697,557

172,655

33%

417,535

149%

Adjusted EBITDA

568,429

971,525

403,096

71%

1,264,091

292,566

30%

695,662

122%

Net operating income from continuing operations

500,784

952,321

451,537

90%

1,251,982

299,661

31%

751,198

150%

Same store cash NOI

322,691

331,999

9,308

3%

334,077

2,078

1%

11,386

4%

Per share data (fully diluted):

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

0.83

$

0.90

$

0.07

8%

$

0.98

$

0.08

9%

$

0.15

18%

Funds from operations

2.18

3.01

0.83

38%

3.09

0.08

3%

0.91

42%

Adjusted interest coverage ratio

3.39x

3.02x

-0.37x

-11%

3.31x

0.29x

10%

-0.08x

-2%

Adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio

2.76x

2.37x

-0.39x

-14%

2.58x

0.21x

9%

-0.18x

-7%

The following table represents the changes in outstanding common stock for the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Year Ended

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2012

Totals

Beginning balance

123,385

147,097

192,275

123,385

Public offerings

20,700

41,400

64,400

126,500

DRIP issuances

1,957

2,534

2,136

6,627

ESP issuances

431

849

-

1,280

Senior note conversions

-

-

1,040

1,040

Preferred stock conversions

339

-

-

339

Option exercises

129

232

341

702

Other, net

156

163

182

501

Ending balance

147,097

192,275

260,374

260,374

Average number of shares outstanding:

Basic

127,656

173,741

224,343

Diluted

128,208

174,401

225,953

We evaluate our business and make resource allocations on our three business segments: seniors housing triple-net, seniors housing operating and medical facilities. The primary performance measures for our properties are NOI and SSCNOI, which are discussed below.  Please see Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

51


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Seniors Housing Triple-net

The following is a summary of our NOI for the seniors housing triple-net segment (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

SSCNOI (1)

$

217,230

$

224,497

$

7,267

3%

$

226,481

$

1,984

1%

$

9,251

4%

Non-cash NOI attributable to same store properties (1)

7,591

6,254

(1,337)

-18%

4,688

(1,566)

-25%

(2,903)

-38%

NOI attributable to non same store properties (2)

98,246

356,888

258,642

263%

488,430

131,542

37%

390,184

397%

NOI

$

323,067

$

587,639

$

264,572

82%

$

719,599

$

131,960

22%

$

396,532

123%

(1) Due to increases in cash and non-cash revenues (described below) related to 235 same store properties.

(2) Primarily due to acquisitions of properties, which totaled 46, 184 and 51 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and conversions of construction projects into revenue-generating properties, which totaled nine, seven and 11 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

The following is a summary of our results of operations for the seniors housing triple-net segment (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

Revenues:

Rental income

$

283,505

$

546,951

$

263,446

93%

$

692,807

$

145,856

27%

$

409,302

144%

Interest income

36,176

34,068

(2,108)

-6%

24,380

(9,688)

-28%

(11,796)

-33%

Other income

3,386

6,620

3,234

96%

2,412

(4,208)

-64%

(974)

-29%

Net operating income from continuing operations (NOI)

323,067

587,639

264,572

82%

719,599

131,960

22%

396,532

123%

Expenses:

Interest expense

(4,524)

238

4,762

n/a

4,601

4,363

1833%

9,125

-202%

Loss (gain) on derivatives, net

-

-

-

n/a

96

96

n/a

96

n/a

Depreciation and amortization

81,718

158,882

77,164

94%

203,987

45,105

28%

122,269

150%

Transaction costs

20,612

27,993

7,381

36%

35,705

7,712

28%

15,093

73%

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net

7,791

-

(7,791)

-100%

2,405

2,405

n/a

(5,386)

-69%

Provision for loan losses

29,684

-

(29,684)

-100%

27,008

27,008

n/a

(2,676)

-9%

135,281

187,113

51,832

38%

273,802

86,689

46%

138,521

102%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and income (loss) from unconsolidated entities

187,786

400,526

212,740

113%

445,797

45,271

11%

258,011

137%

Income tax expense

-

(143)

(143)

n/a

(2,852)

(2,709)

1894%

(2,852)

n/a

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities

-

(9)

(9)

n/a

(33)

(24)

267%

(33)

n/a

Income from continuing operations

187,786

400,374

212,588

113%

442,912

42,538

11%

255,126

136%

Discontinued operations:

Gain (loss) on sales of properties, net

36,274

59,108

22,834

63%

116,838

57,730

98%

80,564

222%

Impairment of assets

-

(1,103)

(1,103)

n/a

(14,699)

(13,596)

1233%

(14,699)

n/a

Income from discontinued operations, net

50,269

40,869

(9,400)

-19%

36,040

(4,829)

-12%

(14,229)

-28%

Discontinued operations, net

86,543

98,874

12,331

14%

138,179

39,305

40%

51,636

60%

Net income

274,329

499,248

224,919

82%

581,091

81,843

16%

306,762

112%

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

(18)

218

236

n/a

429

211

97%

447

-2483%

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

274,347

$

499,030

$

224,683

82%

$

580,662

$

81,632

16%

$

306,315

112%

52


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The increase in rental income is primarily attributable to the acquisitions of new properties and the conversion of newly constructed seniors housing triple-net properties from which we receive rent. Certain of our leases contain annual rental escalators that are contingent upon changes in the Consumer Price Index and/or changes in the gross operating revenues of the tenant’s properties.  These escalators are not fixed, so no straight-line rent is recorded; however, rental income is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.  If gross operating revenues at our facilities and/or the Consumer Price Index do not increase, a portion of our revenues may not continue to increase.  Sales of real property would offset revenue increases and, to the extent that they exceed new acquisitions, could result in decreased revenues.  Our leases could renew above or below current rent rates, resulting in an increase or decrease in rental income.  For the three months ended December 31, 2012, we had no lease renewals but we had 12 leases with rental rate increasers ranging from 0.16% to 0.30% in our seniors housing triple-net portfolio.  The decrease in interest income is attributable to loan payoffs (see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information).

Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 represents $13,572,000, $15,306,000 and $15,111,000, respectively, of secured debt interest expense offset by interest allocated to discontinued operations.  The change in secured debt interest expense is due to the net effect and timing of assumptions, extinguishments and principal amortizations.  The following is a summary of our seniors housing triple-net property secured debt principal activity (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

Year Ended

Year Ended

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2012

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Beginning balance

$

298,492

5.998%

$

172,862

5.265%

$

259,000

5.105%

Debt transferred

(131,214)

6.100%

-

0.000%

-

0.000%

Debt issued

81,977

4.600%

-

0.000%

9,387

4.080%

Debt assumed

78,794

5.867%

90,120

4.819%

83,002

5.304%

Debt extinguished

(150,982)

5.924%

-

0.000%

(128,818)

4.743%

Principal payments

(4,205)

4.388%

(3,982)

5.556%

(3,830)

5.556%

Ending balance

$

172,862

5.265%

$

259,000

5.105%

$

218,741

5.393%

Monthly averages

$

242,123

5.663%

$

234,392

5.141%

$

216,314

5.254%

In connection with secured debt extinguishments, we recognized losses of $7,791,000 and $2,405,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2012, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of new property acquisitions and the conversions of newly constructed investment properties. To the extent that we acquire or dispose of additional properties in the future, our provision for depreciation and amortization will change accordingly.

Transaction costs represent costs incurred with property acquisitions (including due diligence costs, fees for legal and valuation services, and termination of pre-existing relationships computed based on the fair value of the assets acquired), lease termination fees and other similar costs.

Changes in gains on sales of properties are related to property sales which totaled 31, 39 and 73 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively.  We recognized impairment losses on certain held-for-sale facilities as the fair value less estimated costs to sell exceeded our carrying values. The following illustrates the reclassification impact as a result of classifying the properties sold prior to or held for sale at December 31, 2012 as discontinued operations for the periods presented.  Please refer to Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Year Ended December 31,

2010

2011

2012

Rental income

$

99,398

$

75,367

$

55,274

Expenses:

Interest expense

19,635

15,058

8,971

Provision for depreciation

29,494

19,439

10,263

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net

$

50,269

$

40,869

$

36,040

53


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded $29,684,000 of provision for loan losses, which is primarily attributable to the write-off of loans related to certain early stage seniors housing and CCRC development projects.  We did not record any provision for loan loss or have any loan write-offs for seniors housing triple-net investments during the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we wrote off loans totaling $27,008,000, which is attributable to the write-off of one loan at an entrance fee community.  The provision for loan losses is related to our critical accounting estimate for the allowance for loan losses and is discussed in “Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2012 a portion of our seniors housing triple-net properties were formed through partnership interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2012 represents our partners’ share of net income (loss) relating to those properties. In connection with a seniors housing triple-net partnership, we also acquired a minority interest in a separate unconsolidated entity. This investment is reflected as an investment in unconsolidated entities on our consolidated balance sheet. Accordingly, our proportionate share of net income (loss) is reflected as income (loss) from unconsolidated entities on our consolidated income statement.

Seniors Housing Operating

As discussed in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements, we completed additional acquisitions within our seniors housing operating segment during the year ended December 31, 2012. The results of operations for these properties have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the dates of acquisition. The seniors housing operating acquisitions were structured under RIDEA, which is discussed in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements. When considering new acquisitions utilizing the RIDEA structure, we look for opportunities with best-in-class operators with a strong seasoned leadership team, high-quality real estate in attractive markets, growth potential above the standard rent escalators in our triple-net lease seniors housing portfolio, and alignment of economic interests with our operating partner.  Our seniors housing operating properties offer us the opportunity for external growth because we have the right to fund future seniors housing investment opportunities sourced by our operating partners. There were no seniors housing operating segment investments prior to September 1, 2010. As such, the increases in NOI are almost entirely attributable to property acquisitions which totaled 32, 58, and 80 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The following is a summary of our seniors housing operating results of operations (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

Revenues:

Resident fees and services

$

51,006

$

456,085

$

405,079

794%

$

697,494

$

241,409

53%

$

646,488

1267%

Interest income

-

-

-

n/a

6,208

6,208

n/a

6,208

n/a

51,006

456,085

405,079

794%

703,702

247,617

54%

652,696

1280%

Property operating expenses

32,621

314,142

281,521

863%

471,678

157,536

50%

439,057

1346%

Net operating income from continuing operations (NOI)

18,385

141,943

123,558

672%

232,024

90,081

63%

213,639

1162%

Other expenses:

Interest expense

7,794

46,342

38,548

495%

67,524

21,182

46%

59,730

766%

Loss (gain) on derivatives, net

-

-

-

n/a

(1,921)

(1,921)

n/a

(1,921)

n/a

Depreciation and amortization

15,504

138,192

122,688

791%

165,798

27,606

20%

150,294

969%

Transaction costs

20,936

36,328

15,392

74%

12,756

(23,572)

-65%

(8,180)

-39%

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net

-

(979)

(979)

n/a

(2,697)

(1,718)

175%

(2,697)

n/a

44,234

219,883

175,649

397%

241,460

21,577

10%

197,226

446%

Income from continuing operations before income from unconsolidated entities

(25,849)

(77,940)

(52,091)

202%

(9,436)

68,504

-88%

16,413

-63%

Income tax expense

(229)

-

229

n/a

(1,086)

(1,086)

n/a

(857)

374%

Income from unconsolidated entities

-

(1,531)

(1,531)

n/a

(6,364)

(4,833)

316%

(6,364)

n/a

Net income (loss)

(26,078)

(79,471)

(53,393)

205%

(16,886)

62,585

-79%

9,192

-35%

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

(1,656)

(6,006)

(4,350)

263%

(3,015)

2,991

-50%

(1,359)

82%

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

$

(24,422)

$

(73,465)

$

(49,043)

201%

(13,871)

59,594

-81%

10,551

-43%

54


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Fluctuations in revenues and property operating expenses are primarily a result of acquisitions subsequent to September 30, 2010. Interest income relates to the Sunrise loan funded during the three months ended December 31, 2012 (please see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information). The fluctuations in depreciation and amortization are due to acquisitions offset by variations in amortization of short-lived intangible assets. To the extent that we acquire or dispose of additional properties in the future, these amounts will change accordingly. Loss from unconsolidated entities during the year ended December 31, 2012 is primarily attributable to depreciation and amortization of short-lived intangible assets related to our joint venture with Chartwell described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.

Interest expense represents secured debt interest expense as well as interest expense related to our unsecured Canadian term loan discussed further in Note 10 of our audited consolidated financial statements. The following is a summary of our seniors housing operating property secured debt principal activity, which excludes the Canadian term loan (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

Year Ended

Year Ended

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2012

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Beginning balance

$

-

0.000%

$

487,706

5.939%

$

1,318,599

4.665%

Debt transferred

131,214

6.100%

-

0.000%

-

0.000%

Debt issued

75,179

6.386%

114,903

5.779%

148,031

4.220%

Debt assumed

318,125

5.855%

780,955

4.269%

115,371

5.512%

Debt extinguished

(35,017)

6.723%

(55,317)

5.949%

(193,962)

4.395%

Foreign currency

-

0.000%

-

0.000%

187

5.624%

Principal payments

(1,795)

6.165%

(9,648)

5.474%

(18,700)

4.850%

Ending balance

$

487,706

5.939%

$

1,318,599

4.665%

$

1,369,526

4.874%

Monthly averages

$

350,259

5.957%

$

969,265

5.679%

$

1,366,758

4.866%

In connection with secured debt extinguishments, we recognized gains of $979,000 and $2,697,000 during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2012 , we recognized a net realized gain on derivatives of $1,921,000 associated with our Chartwell transaction discussed in Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Transaction costs were incurred in connection with acquisitions that occurred during the relevant periods. Transaction costs generally include due diligence costs and fees for legal and valuation services, charges associated with the termination of pre-existing relationships computed based on the fair value of the assets acquired and lease termination fees. The decline in transaction costs from 2011 to 2012 is primarily attributable to termination of pre-existing relationships incurred during 2011.  The majority of our seniors housing operating properties are formed through partnership interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2012 represents our partners’ share of net income (loss) related to those properties.

55


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Medical Facilities

The following is a summary of our NOI for the medical facilities segment (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

SSCNOI (1)

$

105,461

$

107,502

$

2,041

2%

$

107,596

$

94

0%

$

2,135

2%

Non-cash NOI attributable to same store properties (1)

5,862

4,426

(1,436)

-24%

2,909

(1,517)

-34%

(2,953)

-50%

NOI attributable to non same store properties (2)

45,135

110,121

64,986

144%

188,942

78,821

72%

143,807

319%

NOI

$

156,458

$

222,049

$

65,591

42%

$

299,447

$

77,398

35%

$

142,989

91%

(1) Due to increases in cash and non-cash revenues (described below) related to 95 same store properties.

(2) Primarily due to acquisitions of properties, which totaled 36, 35 and 34 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and conversions of construction projects into revenue-generating properties, which totaled four, seven and five for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

The following is a summary of our results of operations for the medical facilities segment (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

Revenues:

Rental income

$

195,960

$

274,659

$

78,699

40%

$

387,462

$

112,803

41%

$

191,502

98%

Interest income

4,679

7,002

2,323

50%

8,477

1,475

21%

3,798

81%

Other income

985

3,985

3,000

305%

1,947

(2,038)

-51%

962

98%

201,624

285,646

84,022

42%

397,886

112,240

39%

196,262

97%

Property operating expenses

45,166

63,597

18,431

41%

98,439

34,842

55%

53,273

118%

Net operating income from continuing operations (NOI)

156,458

222,049

65,591

42%

299,447

77,398

35%

142,989

91%

Other expenses:

Interest expense

17,579

21,909

4,330

25%

31,540

9,631

44%

13,961

79%

Depreciation and amortization

67,943

96,808

28,865

42%

146,103

49,295

51%

78,160

115%

Transaction costs

5,112

5,903

791

15%

13,148

7,245

123%

8,036

157%

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net

1,308

-

(1,308)

-100%

(483)

(483)

n/a

(1,791)

n/a

Provision for loan losses

-

2,010

2,010

n/a

-

(2,010)

n/a

-

n/a

91,942

126,630

34,688

38%

190,308

63,678

50%

98,366

107%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and income from unconsolidated entities

64,516

95,419

30,903

48%

109,139

13,720

14%

44,623

69%

Income tax expense

(77)

(361)

(284)

369%

(2,381)

(2,020)

560%

(2,304)

2992%

Income from unconsolidated entities

6,673

7,312

639

10%

8,879

1,567

21%

2,206

33%

Income from continuing operations

71,112

102,370

31,258

44%

115,637

13,267

13%

44,525

63%

Discontinued operations:

Gain (loss) on sales of properties, net

(159)

2,052

2,211

n/a

(16,289)

(18,341)

-894%

(16,130)

10145%

Impairment of assets

(947)

(11,091)

(10,144)

1071%

(14,588)

(3,497)

32%

(13,641)

1440%

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net

638

5,887

5,249

823%

7,015

1,128

19%

6,377

1000%

Discontinued operations, net

(468)

(3,152)

(2,684)

574%

(23,862)

(20,710)

657%

(23,394)

4999%

Net income (loss)

70,644

99,218

28,574

40%

91,775

(7,443)

-8%

21,131

30%

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

2,031

894

(1,137)

-56%

171

(723)

-81%

(1,860)

-92%

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

$

68,613

$

98,324

$

29,711

43%

$

91,604

$

(6,720)

-7%

$

22,991

34%

56


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The increase in rental income is primarily attributable to the acquisitions of new properties and the construction conversions of medical facilities from which we receive rent. Certain of our leases contain annual rental escalators that are contingent upon changes in the Consumer Price Index.  These escalators are not fixed, so no straight-line rent is recorded; however, rental income is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.  If the Consumer Price Index does not increase, a portion of our revenues may not continue to increase.  Sales of real property would offset revenue increases and, to the extent that they exceed new acquisitions, could result in decreased revenues.  Our leases could renew above or below current rent rates, resulting in an increase or decrease in rental income.  For the three months ended December 31, 2012, our consolidated medical office building portfolio signed 50,323 square feet of new leases and 172,647 square feet of renewals.  The weighted-average term of these leases was five years, with a rate of $20.55 per square foot and tenant improvement and lease commission costs of $8.77 per square foot.  Substantially all of these leases during the referenced quarter contain an annual fixed or contingent escalation rent structure ranging from the change in CPI to 3%.  For the three months ended December 31, 2012, we had no lease renewals but we had one lease with a rental rate increaser of 2.0% in our hospital portfolio.  Interest income increased from the prior period primarily due to an increase in outstanding balances for medical facility real estate loans.

Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 represents $38,786,000, $31,477,000, and $24,926,000, respectively, of secured debt interest expense offset by interest allocated to discontinued operations.  The change in secured debt interest expense is primarily due to the net effect and timing of assumptions, extinguishments and principal amortizations.  The following is a summary of our medical facilities secured debt principal activity (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

Year Ended

Year Ended

December 31, 2010

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2012

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Beginning balance

$

314,065

5.677%

$

463,477

5.286%

$

520,066

5.981%

Debt assumed

167,737

6.637%

69,779

5.921%

246,371

5.888%

Debt extinguished

(8,494)

6.045%

-

0.000%

(37,622)

5.858%

Principal payments

(9,831)

6.279%

(13,190)

6.208%

(15,095)

6.180%

Ending balance

$

463,477

5.286%

$

520,066

5.981%

$

713,720

5.950%

Monthly averages

$

458,196

5.961%

$

489,923

6.179%

$

669,753

5.952%

In connection with secured debt extinguishments, we recognized a loss of $1,308,000 and a gain of $483,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2012, respectively.

The increase in property operating expenses and depreciation and amortization is primarily attributable to acquisitions and construction conversions of new medical facilities for which we incur certain property operating expenses offset by property operating expenses associated with discontinued operations.

Transaction costs for the year ended December 31, 2012 represent costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of new properties.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded $2,010,000 of provision for loan losses, which is primarily attributable to the write-off of a hospital loan.

Income from unconsolidated entities includes our share of net income related to our joint venture investment with Forest City Enterprises and certain unconsolidated property investments related to our strategic joint venture relationship with a national medical office building company.  See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Changes in gains/losses on sales of properties is related to property sales which totaled seven, three and 20 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively.  We recognized impairment losses on certain held for sale facilities as the fair value less estimated costs to sell exceeded our carrying values.  The following illustrates the reclassification impact as a result of classifying the properties sold prior to or held for sale at December 31, 2012 as discontinued operations for the periods presented.  Please refer to Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

57


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31,

2010

2011

2012

Rental income

$

24,547

$

31,870

$

24,049

Expenses:

Interest expense

7,347

9,568

7,246

Property operating expenses

8,678

6,131

2,354

Provision for depreciation

7,884

10,284

7,434

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net

$

638

$

5,887

$

7,015

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests primarily relates to certain properties that are consolidated in our operating results but where we have less than a 100% ownership interest.

Non-Segment/Corporate

The following is a summary of our results of operations for the non-segment/corporate activities (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

Revenues:

Other income

$

2,874

$

690

$

(2,184)

-76%

$

912

$

222

32%

$

(1,962)

-68%

Expenses:

Interest expense

113,129

228,884

115,755

102%

263,418

34,534

15%

150,289

133%

General and administrative

54,626

77,201

22,575

41%

97,341

20,140

26%

42,715

78%

Loss (gain) on extinguishments of debt, net

25,072

-

(25,072)

-100%

-

-

n/a

(25,072)

-100%

192,827

306,085

113,258

59%

360,759

54,674

18%

167,932

87%

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

(189,953)

(305,395)

(115,442)

61%

(359,847)

(54,452)

18%

(169,894)

89%

Income tax expense (benefit)

(58)

(884)

(826)

1424%

(1,293)

(409)

46%

(1,235)

2129%

Net loss

(190,011)

(306,279)

(116,268)

61%

(361,140)

(54,861)

18%

(171,129)

90%

Preferred stock dividends

21,645

60,502

38,857

180%

69,129

8,627

14%

47,484

219%

Preferred stock redemption charge

-

-

-

n/a

6,242

6,242

n/a

6,242

n/a

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$

(211,656)

$

(366,781)

$

(155,125)

73%

$

(436,511)

$

(69,730)

19%

$

(224,855)

106%

Other income primarily represents income from non-real estate activities such as interest earned on temporary investments of cash reserves.

The following is a summary of our non-segment/corporate interest expense (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

One Year Change

Year Ended

One Year Change

Two Year Change

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2010

2011

$

%

2012

$

%

$

%

Senior unsecured notes

$

122,492

$

222,559

$

100,067

82%

$

249,564

$

27,005

12%

$

127,072

104%

Secured debt

645

604

(41)

-6%

557

(47)

-8%

(88)

-14%

Unsecured lines of credit

3,974

7,917

3,943

99%

11,769

3,852

49%

7,795

196%

Capitalized interest

(20,792)

(13,164)

7,628

-37%

(9,777)

3,387

-26%

11,015

-53%

Interest SWAP savings

(161)

(161)

-

0%

(96)

65

-40%

65

-40%

Loan expense

6,971

11,129

4,158

60%

11,401

272

2%

4,430

64%

Totals

$

113,129

$

228,884

$

115,755

102%

$

263,418

$

34,534

15%

$

150,289

133%

58


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The change in interest expense on senior unsecured notes is due to the net effect of issuances and extinguishments.  Please refer to Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.  We capitalize certain interest costs associated with funds used for the construction of properties owned directly by us. The amount capitalized is based upon the balances outstanding during the construction period using the rate of interest that approximates our cost of financing. Our interest expense is reduced by the amount capitalized.  Please see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our interest rate swap agreements and their impact on interest expense.  Loan expense represents the amortization of deferred loan costs incurred in connection with the issuance and amendments of debt. Loan expense changes are due to amortization of charges for costs incurred for senior unsecured note issuance.  The change in interest expense on the unsecured line of credit arrangements is due primarily to the net effect and timing of draws, paydowns and variable interest rate changes.  Please refer to Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our unsecured line of credit arrangements.

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues (including revenues from discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were 5.12%, 5.37% and 7.78%, respectively.  The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily related to costs associated with our initiatives to attract and retain appropriate personnel to achieve our business objectives.  The decline in percent of revenue is primarily related to the increasing revenue base as a result of our acquisitions.

The changes in preferred stock dividends and redemption charge are primarily attributable to the net effect of issuances, redemptions and conversions.  Please see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We believe that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we consider FFO to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time as evidenced by the provision for depreciation. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. In response, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for REITs that excludes historical cost depreciation from net income. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, means net income, computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate and impairment of depreciable assets, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated entities.

Net operating income from continuing operations (“NOI”) is used to evaluate the operating performance of our properties. We define NOI as total revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level operating expenses, which exclude depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, impairments and interest expense. Property operating expenses represent costs associated with managing, maintaining and servicing tenants for our seniors housing operating and medical facility properties.  These expenses include, but are not limited to, property-related payroll and benefits, property management fees, marketing, housekeeping, food service, maintenance, utilities, property taxes and insurance.  General and administrative expenses represent costs unrelated to property operations or transaction costs.  These expenses include, but are not limited to, payroll and benefits, professional services, office expenses and depreciation of corporate fixed assets.  Same store cash NOI (“SSCNOI”) is used to evaluate the cash-based operating performance of our properties under a consistent population which eliminates changes in the composition of our portfolio.  As used herein, same store is generally defined as those revenue-generating properties in the portfolio for the full three year reporting period.  Any properties acquired, developed, transitioned or classified in discontinued operations during that period are excluded from the same store amounts.  We believe NOI and SSCNOI provide investors relevant and useful information because they measure the operating performance of our properties at the property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI and SSCNOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of our properties.

EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We believe that EBITDA, along with net income and cash flow provided from operating activities, is an important supplemental measure because it provides additional information to assess and evaluate the performance of our operations. We primarily utilize EBITDA to measure our interest coverage ratio, which represents EBITDA divided by total interest, and our fixed charge coverage ratio, which represents EBITDA divided by fixed charges. Fixed charges include total interest, secured debt principal amortization and preferred dividends.

A covenant in our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement and Canadian denominated term loan contains a financial ratio based on a definition of EBITDA that is specific to that agreement. Failure to satisfy these covenants could result in an event of default that could have a material adverse impact on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. Due to the materiality of these debt agreements and the financial covenants, we have disclosed Adjusted EBITDA, which represents EBITDA as defined above and adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, provision for loan losses and gain/loss on extinguishment of debt. We use Adjusted EBITDA to measure our adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio, which represents Adjusted EBITDA divided by fixed charges on a trailing twelve months

59


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

basis. Fixed charges include total interest (excluding capitalized interest and non-cash interest expenses), secured debt principal amortization and preferred dividends. Our covenant requires an adjusted fixed charge ratio of at least 1.50 times.

Other than Adjusted EBITDA, our supplemental reporting measures and similarly entitled financial measures are widely used by investors, equity and debt analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies. Management uses these financial measures to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results and in making operating decisions. Additionally, these measures are utilized by the Board of Directors to evaluate management. Adjusted EBITDA is used solely to determine our compliance with a financial covenant in our primary line of credit arrangement and Canadian denominated term loan and is not being presented for use by investors for any other purpose. None of our supplemental measures represent net income or cash flow provided from operating activities as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternative measures of profitability or liquidity. Finally, the supplemental measures, as defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly entitled items reported by other real estate investment trusts or other companies.

The table below reflects the reconciliation of FFO to net income attributable to common stockholders, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. The provisions for depreciation and amortization include provisions for depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations. Noncontrolling interest amounts represent the noncontrolling interests’ share of transaction costs and depreciation and amortization.  Unconsolidated entity amounts represent our share of unconsolidated entities’ depreciation and amortization.  Amounts are in thousands except for per share data.

Year Ended December 31,

FFO Reconciliation:

2010

2011

2012

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

106,882

$

157,108

$

221,884

Depreciation and amortization

202,543

423,605

533,585

Impairment of assets

947

12,194

29,287

Loss (gain) on sales of properties

(36,115)

(61,160)

(100,549)

Noncontrolling interests

(2,749)

(18,557)

(21,058)

Unconsolidated entities

8,514

11,712

34,408

Funds from operations

$

280,022

$

524,902

$

697,557

Average common shares outstanding:

Basic

127,656

173,741

224,343

Diluted

128,208

174,401

225,953

Per share data:

Net income attributable to common stockholders

Basic

$

0.84

$

0.90

$

0.99

Diluted

0.83

0.90

0.98

Funds from operations

Basic

$

2.19

$

3.02

$

3.11

Diluted

2.18

3.01

3.09

60


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The table below reflects the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. Interest expense and the provisions for depreciation and amortization include discontinued operations. Dollars are in thousands.

Year Ended December 31,

Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation:

2010

2011

2012

Net income

$

128,884

$

212,716

$

294,840

Interest expense

160,960

321,999

383,300

Income tax expense (benefit)

364

1,388

7,612

Depreciation and amortization

202,543

423,605

533,585

Stock-based compensation expense

11,823

10,786

18,521

Provision for loan losses

29,684

2,010

27,008

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

34,171

(979)

(775)

Adjusted EBITDA

$

568,429

$

971,525

$

1,264,091

Adjusted Interest Coverage Ratio:

Interest expense

$

160,960

$

321,999

$

383,300

Capitalized interest

20,792

13,164

9,777

Non-cash interest expense

(13,945)

(13,905)

(11,395)

Total interest

167,807

321,258

381,682

Adjusted EBITDA

$

568,429

$

971,525

$

1,264,091

Adjusted interest coverage ratio

3.39x

3.02x

3.31x

Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio:

Interest expense

$

160,960

$

321,999

$

383,300

Capitalized interest

20,792

13,164

9,777

Non-cash interest expense

(13,945)

(13,905)

(11,395)

Secured debt principal payments

16,652

27,804

38,554

Preferred dividends

21,645

60,502

69,129

Total fixed charges

206,104

409,564

489,365

Adjusted EBITDA

$

568,429

$

971,525

$

1,264,091

Adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio

2.76x

2.37x

2.58x

61


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following tables reflect the reconciliation of NOI and SSCNOI to net income attributable to common stockholders, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented.  Amounts are in thousands.

Year Ended December 31,

NOI Reconciliation:

2010

2011

2012

Total revenues:

Seniors housing triple-net

$

323,067

$

587,639

$

719,599

Seniors housing operating

51,006

456,085

703,702

Medical facilities

201,624

285,646

397,886

Non-segment/corporate

2,874

690

912

Total revenues

578,571

1,330,060

1,822,099

Property operating expenses:

Seniors housing operating

32,621

314,142

471,678

Medical facilities

45,166

63,597

98,439

Total property operating expenses

77,787

377,739

570,117

Net operating income:

Seniors housing triple-net

323,067

587,639

719,599

Seniors housing operating

18,385

141,943

232,024

Medical facilities

156,458

222,049

299,447

Non-segment/corporate

2,874

690

912

Net operating income from continuing operations

$

500,784

$

952,321

$

1,251,982

Reconciling items:

Interest expense

(133,978)

(297,373)

(367,083)

Loss (gain) on derivatives, net

-

-

1,825

Depreciation and amortization

(165,165)

(393,882)

(515,888)

General and administrative

(54,626)

(77,201)

(97,341)

Transaction costs

(46,660)

(70,224)

(61,609)

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

(34,171)

979

775

Provision for loan losses

(29,684)

(2,010)

(27,008)

Income tax benefit (expense)

(364)

(1,388)

(7,612)

Income from unconsolidated entities

6,673

5,772

2,482

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net

86,075

95,722

114,317

Preferred dividends

(21,645)

(60,502)

(69,129)

Preferred stock redemption charge

-

-

(6,242)

Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests

(357)

4,894

2,415

(393,902)

(795,213)

(1,030,098)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

$

106,882

$

157,108

$

221,884

62


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31,

Same Store Cash NOI Reconciliation:

2010

2011

2012

Net operating income from continuing operations:

Seniors housing triple-net

$

323,067

$

587,639

$

719,599

Seniors housing operating

18,385

141,943

232,024

Medical facilities

156,458

222,049

299,447

Total

497,910

951,631

1,251,070

Adjustments:

Seniors housing triple-net:

Non-cash NOI on same store properties

(7,591)

(6,254)

(4,688)

NOI attributable to non same store properties

(98,246)

(356,888)

(488,430)

Subtotal

(105,837)

(363,142)

(493,118)

Seniors housing operating:

Non-cash NOI on same store properties

-

-

-

NOI attributable to non same store properties

(18,385)

(141,943)

(232,024)

Subtotal

(18,385)

(141,943)

(232,024)

Medical facilities:

Non-cash NOI on same store properties

(5,862)

(4,426)

(2,909)

NOI attributable to non same store properties

(45,135)

(110,121)

(188,942)

Subtotal

(50,997)

(114,547)

(191,851)

Total

(244,601)

(876,122)

(1,340,868)

Same store cash net operating income:

Seniors housing triple-net

217,230

224,497

226,481

Seniors housing operating

-

-

-

Medical facilities

105,461

107,502

107,596

Total

$

322,691

$

331,999

$

334,077

63


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Health Care Industry

The demand for health care services, and consequently health care properties, is projected to reach unprecedented levels in the near future. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) projects that national health expenditures will rise to $3.3 trillion in 2015 or 18.2% of gross domestic product (“GDP”). The average annual growth in national health expenditures for 2011 through 2021 is expected to be 5.9%.

While demographics are the primary driver of demand, economic conditions and availability of services contribute to health care service utilization rates. We believe the health care property market may be less susceptible to fluctuations and economic downturns relative to other property sectors. Investor interest in the market remains strong, especially in specific sectors such as private-pay senior living and medical office buildings. As a REIT, we believe we are situated to benefit from any turbulence in the capital markets due to our access to capital.

The total U.S. population is projected to increase by 18.6% through 2030. The elderly population aged 65 and over is projected to increase by 78.3% through 2030. The elderly are an important component of health care utilization, especially independent living services, assisted living services, skilled nursing services, inpatient and outpatient hospital services and physician ambulatory care. Most health care services are provided within a health care facility such as a hospital, a physician’s office or a seniors housing community. Therefore, we believe there will be continued demand for companies, such as ours, with expertise in health care real estate.

Health care real estate investment opportunities tend to increase as demand for health care services increases.  We recognize the need for health care real estate as it correlates to health care service demand.  Health care providers require real estate to house their businesses and expand their services.  We believe that investment opportunities in health care real estate will continue to be present due to:

· The specialized nature of the industry, which enhances the credibility and experience of our company;

· The projected population growth combined with stable or increasing health care utilization rates, which ensures demand; and

· The on-going merger and acquisition activity.

Health Reform Laws

On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “PPACA”) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which amends the PPACA (collectively, the “Health Reform Laws”). The Health Reform Laws contain various provisions that may directly impact us or the operators and tenants of our properties. Some provisions of the Health Reform Laws may have a positive impact on our operators’ or tenants’ revenues, by, for example, increasing coverage of uninsured individuals, while others may have a negative impact on the reimbursement of our operators or tenants by, for example, altering the market basket adjustments for certain types of health care facilities. The Health Reform Laws also enhance certain fraud and abuse penalty provisions that could apply to our operators and tenants, in the event of one or more violations of the federal health care regulatory laws. In addition, there are provisions that impact the health coverage that we and our operators and tenants provide to our respective employees.   We cannot predict whether the existing Health Reform Laws, or future health care reform legislation or regulatory changes, will have a material impact on our operators’ or tenants’ property or business. If the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our operators and tenants are materially adversely impacted by the Health Reform Laws or future legislation, our revenue and operations may be adversely affected as well.  On June 28, 2012, The United States Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate of the Health Reform Laws but partially invalidated the expansion of Medicaid. The ruling on Medicaid expansion will allow States not to participate in the expansion – and to forego funding for the Medicaid expansion – without losing their existing Medicaid funding. Given that the federal government substantially funds the Medicaid expansion, it is unclear whether any state will pursue this option, although at least some appear to be considering this option at this time.

Impact to Reimbursement of the Operators and Tenants of Our Properties. The Health Reform Laws provide for various changes to the reimbursement that our operators and tenants may receive. One such change is a reduction to the market basket adjustments for inpatient acute hospitals, long−term care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, home health agencies, psychiatric hospitals, hospice care and outpatient hospitals.  Since 2010, the otherwise applicable percentage increase to the market basket for inpatient acute hospitals has decreased.  Since 2012, inpatient acute hospitals have also faced a downward adjustment of the annual percentage increase to the market basket rate by a “productivity adjustment.” The productivity adjustment may cause the annual percentage increase to be less than zero, which would mean that inpatient acute hospitals could face payment rates for a fiscal year that are less than the payment rates for the preceding year.

A similar productivity adjustment has applied to skilled nursing facilities since 2012, which means that the payment rates for skilled nursing facilities may decrease from one year to the next. Long−term care hospitals have faced a specified percentage decrease

64


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

in their annual update for discharges since 2010. Additionally, since 2012, long−term care hospitals have been subject to the productivity adjustments, which may decrease the federal payment rates for long−term care hospitals. Similar productivity adjustments and other adjustments to payment rates have applied to inpatient rehabilitation facilities, psychiatric hospitals and outpatient hospitals since 2010.

The Health Reform Laws revise other reimbursement provisions that may affect our business. For example, the Health Reform Laws reduce states’ Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (“DSH”) allotments, starting in 2014 through 2020. These allotments would have provided additional funding for DSH hospitals that are operators or tenants of our properties, and thus, any reduction might negatively impact these operators or tenants.

Additionally, under the Health Reform Laws, beginning in fiscal year 2015, Medicare payments will decrease to hospitals for treatment associated with hospital acquired conditions. This decreased payment rate may negatively impact our operators or tenants. To account for excess readmissions, the Health Reform Laws also call for a reduction of 1% in payments for those hospitals with higher−than−average risk−adjusted readmission rates beginning October 1, 2012, 2% beginning in fiscal year 2014, and 3% from fiscal year 2015 onward. These reductions in payments to our operators or tenants may affect their ability to make payments to us.

The Health Reform Laws additionally call for the creation of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (the “Board”), which will be responsible for establishing payment policies, including recommendations in the event that Medicare costs exceed a certain threshold. Proposals for recommendations submitted by the Board prior to December 31, 2018 may not include recommendations that would reduce payments for hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and physicians, among other providers, prior to December 31, 2019.  On March 22, 2012, the House of Representatives approved legislation that would repeal the Board.  While this legislation was not passed by the Senate, if such a repeal were signed into law in the future, reimbursement to our tenants and operators may be impacted.

The Health Reform Laws also create other mechanisms that could permit significant changes to payment. For example, the Health Reform Laws establish the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test innovative payment and service delivery models to reduce program expenditures through the use of demonstration programs that can waive existing reimbursement methodologies. As another example, on November 2, 2011, CMS published the final rule implementing section 3022 of the Health Reform Laws, which contains provisions relating to Medicare payment to providers and suppliers participating in Accountable Care Organizations (“ACOs”) under the Medicare Shared Servings Program. Under the program, Medicare will share a percentage of savings with ACOs that meet certain quality and saving requirements, thereby allowing providers to receive incentive payments in addition to their traditional fee−for−service payments. Under the program, more experienced providers may assume the risk of losses in exchange for greater potential rewards: ACOs may share up to 50% of the savings under the one−sided model and up to 60% of the savings under the two−sided model, depending on their quality and performance. The amount of shared losses for which an ACO is liable in the two−sided model may not exceed the following percentages of its updated benchmark: 5% in the first performance year, 7.5% in the second year, and 10% in the third year. These shared losses could affect the ability of ACO operators or tenants to meet their financial obligations to us. The Health Reform Laws also provide additional Medicaid funding to allow states to carry out the expansion of Medicaid coverage to certain financially−eligible individuals beginning in 2014, and also permit states to expand their Medicaid coverage to these individuals since April 1, 2010, if certain conditions are met.   The Health Reform Laws also extend certain payment rules related to long−term acute care hospitals found in the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (“MMSEA”).

Additionally, although the Health Reform Laws delayed  implementation of the Resource Utilization Group, Version Four (“RUG−IV”), which revises the payment classification system for skilled nursing facilities, the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010 repealed this delay retroactively to October 1, 2010. The implementation of the RUG-IV classification may impact our tenants and operators by revising the classifications of certain patients.  The federal reimbursement for certain facilities, such as skilled nursing facilities, incorporates adjustments to account for facility case-mix. The Health Reform Laws also extend certain payment rules related to long−term acute care hospitals found in the MMSEA.  The MMSEA delayed the implementation of a policy referred to as the “25% threshold rule” that would limit the proportion of patients who can be admitted from a co-located or host hospital during a cost reporting period and be paid under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system.  The Health Reform Laws further extended the delay, which expired at various points in calendar year 2012, depending on the start of the provider’s cost reporting period.

Finally, many other changes resulting from the Health Reform Laws, or implementing regulations or guidance may negatively impact our operators and tenants. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the Health Reform Laws and implementing regulations and guidance to determine other potential effects of the reform.

Impact of Fraud and Abuse Provisions. The Health Reform Laws revise health care fraud and abuse provisions that will affect our operators and tenants. Specifically, the Health Reform Laws allow for up to treble damages under the Federal False Claims Act for violations related to state−based health insurance exchanges authorized by the Health Reform Laws, which will be implemented

65


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

beginning in 2014. The Health Reform Laws also impose new civil monetary penalties for false statements or actions that lead to delayed inspections, with penalties of up to $15,000 per day for failure to grant timely access and up to $50,000 for a knowing violation. Additionally, the Health Reform Laws require certain entities – including providers, suppliers, Medicaid managed care organizations, Medicare Advantage organizations, and prescription drug program sponsors – to report and return overpayments to the appropriate payer by the later of (a) sixty (60) days after the date the overpayment was “identified,” or (b) the date that the “corresponding cost report” is due. The entity also must notify the payer in writing of the reason for the overpayment. A violation of these requirements may result in criminal liability, civil liability under the FCA, and/or exclusion from the federal health care programs. On February 14, 2012, CMS published a proposed rule implementing the Health Reform Laws requirement that health care providers and suppliers report and return self−identified overpayments by the later of 60 days after the date the overpayment was identified, or the date any corresponding cost report is due, if applicable. The Health Reform Laws also amend the Federal Anti−Kickback Statute (“AKS”) to state that any items or services “resulting from” a violation of the AKS constitutes a “false or fraudulent claim” under the Federal False Claims Act. The Health Reform Laws also provide for additional funding to investigate and prosecute health care fraud and abuse. Accordingly, the increased penalties under the Health Reform Laws for fraud and abuse violations may have a negative impact on our operators and tenants in the event that the government brings an enforcement action or subjects them to penalties.

Further, CMS published final rulemaking to implement the enhanced provider and supplier screening provisions called for in the Health Reform Laws. Under the final rule, beginning March 25, 2011, all enrolling and participating providers and suppliers are assessed an annual administrative fee and are placed in one of three risk levels (limited, moderate, and high) based on an assessment of the individual’s or entity’s overall risk of fraud, waste and abuse. This rule also allows for the temporary suspension of Medicare payments to providers or suppliers in the event CMS receives credible information that an overpayment, fraud, or willful misrepresentation has occurred. The Health Reform Laws granted the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services significant discretionary authority to suspend, exclude, or impose fines on providers and suppliers based on the agency’s determination that such a provider or supplier is “high−risk,” and, as a result, this final rulemaking has the potential to materially adversely affect our operators and tenants who may be evaluated under the enhanced screening process.

On November 2, 2011, CMS and OIG jointly published the final rule establishing waivers of certain fraud and abuse laws to ACOs. These waivers include automatic AKS, Stark, and Civil Monetary Penalty Law waivers that may be applied in certain situations and that will apply uniformly to each ACO, ACO participant, and ACO provider/supplier. Notably, the final rule states that CMS and OIG intend to closely monitor ACOs through June 2013 to ensure that these waivers are not causing “undesirable effects” and need to be narrowed to prevent fraud and abuse.

Additionally, provisions of Title VI of the Health Care Reform Laws are designed to increase transparency and program integrity by skilled nursing facilities, other nursing facilities and similar providers. Specifically, skilled nursing facilities and other providers and suppliers will be required to institute compliance and ethics programs. Additionally, the Health Reform Laws make it easier for consumers to file complaints against nursing homes by mandating that states establish complaint websites. The provisions calling for enhanced transparency will increase the administrative burden and costs on these providers.

Impact to the Health Care Plans Offered to Our Employees. The Health Reform Laws affect employers that provide health plans to their employees. The new laws change the tax treatment of the Medicare Part D retiree drug subsidy and extend dependent coverage for dependents up to age 26, among other changes. We continue to evaluate our health care plans for these changes as new reform laws are enacted. These changes may affect our operators and tenants as well.

66


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions.  Management considers accounting estimates or assumptions critical if:

· the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and

· the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.

Management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosure presented below relating to them.  Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate and are not reasonably likely to change in the future.  However, since these estimates require assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made, they bear the risk of change.  If actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.  Please refer to Note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements for further information on significant accounting policies that impact us. There were no material changes to these policies in 2012.

The following table presents information about our critical accounting policies, as well as the material assumptions used to develop each estimate:

Nature of Critical

Accounting Estimate

Assumptions/Approach

Used

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and the accounts of joint venture entities in which we own a majority voting interest with the ability to control operations and where no substantive participating rights or substantive kick out rights have been granted to the noncontrolling interests.  In addition, we consolidate those entities deemed to be variable interest entities in which we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

We make judgments about which entities are VIEs based on an assessment of whether (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest, or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. We make judgments with respect to our level of influence or control of an entity and whether we are (or are not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Consideration of various factors includes, but is not limited to, our ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, our form of ownership interest, our representation on the entity's governing body, the size and seniority of our investment, our ability and the rights of other investors to participate in policy making decisions, replace the manager and/or liquidate the entity, if applicable. Our ability to correctly assess our influence or control over an entity at inception of our involvement or on a continuous basis when determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE affects the presentation of these entities in our consolidated financial statements. If we perform a primary beneficiary analysis at a date other than at inception of the variable interest entity, our assumptions may be different and may result in the identification of a different primary beneficiary.

Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to evaluate our compliance with REIT requirements.

Our determinations are based on interpretation of tax laws, and our conclusions may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments to income tax expense may be required as a result of: (i) audits conducted by federal and state tax authorities, (ii) our ability to qualify as a REIT, (iii) the potential for built-in-gain recognized related to prior-tax-free acquisitions of C corporations, and (iv) changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included in income.

67


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Nature of Critical

Accounting Estimate

Assumptions/Approach

Used

Business Combinations

Real property developed by us is recorded at cost, including the capitalization of construction period interest. The cost of real property acquired is allocated to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets primarily consist of land, buildings and improvements. The remaining purchase price is allocated among identifiable intangible assets primarily consisting of the above or below market component of in-place leases and the value of in-place leases. The total amount of other intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship values based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with that respective tenant.

We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to the buildings as-if-vacant, land and in-place leases. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in-place leases, we make our best estimates based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Our assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-place leases.

We compute depreciation and amortization on our properties using the straight-line method based on their estimated useful lives which range from 15 to 40 years for buildings and five to 15 years for improvements. Amortization periods for intangibles are based on the estimated remaining useful lives of the underlying agreements.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain an allowance for loan losses in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our loans receivable.  The determination of the allowance is based on a quarterly evaluation of all outstanding loans.  If this evaluation indicates that there is a greater risk of loan charge-offs, additional allowances or placement on non-accrual status may be required.  A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due as scheduled according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement.  Consistent with this definition, all loans on non-accrual are deemed impaired.  To the extent circumstances improve and the risk of collectability is diminished, we will return these loans to full accrual status.

The determination of the allowance is based on a quarterly evaluation of all outstanding loans, including general economic conditions and estimated collectability of loan payments and principal. We evaluate the collectability of our loans receivable based on a combination of factors, including, but not limited to, delinquency status, historical loan charge-offs, financial strength of the borrower and guarantors and value of the underlying property.

68


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Nature of Critical

Accounting Estimate

Assumptions/Approach

Used

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires that revenue be recognized after four basic criteria are met. These four criteria include persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectability. If the collectability of revenue is determined incorrectly, the amount and timing of our reported revenue could be significantly affected. Interest income on loans is recognized as earned based upon the principal amount outstanding subject to an evaluation of collectability risk. Substantially all of our operating leases contain fixed and/or contingent escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.  We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided.  Lease agreements with residents generally have a term of one year and are cancelable by the resident with 30 days’ notice.

We evaluate the collectability of our revenues and related receivables on an on-going basis. We evaluate collectability based on assumptions and other considerations including, but not limited to, the certainty of payment, payment history, the financial strength of the investment’s underlying operations as measured by cash flows and payment coverages, the value of the underlying collateral and guaranties and current economic conditions.

If our evaluation indicates that collectability is not reasonably assured, we may place an investment on non-accrual or reserve against all or a portion of current income as an offset to revenue.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets for potential impairment in accordance with U.S. GAAP. An impairment charge must be recognized when the carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable.  The carrying value is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.  If it is determined that a permanent impairment of a long-lived asset has occurred, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to its fair value and an impairment charge is recognized for the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.

The net book value of long-lived assets is reviewed quarterly on a property by property basis to determine if there are indicators of impairment.  These indicators may include anticipated operating losses at the property level, the tenant’s inability to make rent payments, a decision to dispose of an asset before the end of its estimated useful life and changes in the market that may permanently reduce the value of the property.  If indicators of impairment exist, then the undiscounted future cash flows from the most likely use of the property are compared to the current net book value.  This analysis requires us to determine if indicators of impairment exist and to estimate the most likely stream of cash flows to be generated from the property during the period the property is expected to be held.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The valuation of derivative instruments is accounted for in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires companies to record derivatives at fair market value on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities.

The valuation of derivative instruments requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. Fair values for our derivatives are estimated by utilizing pricing models that consider forward yield curves and discount rates. Such amounts and their recognition are subject to significant estimates which may change in the future.

69


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Impact of Inflation

During the past three years, inflation has not significantly affected our earnings because of the moderate inflation rate. Additionally, our earnings are primarily long-term investments with predictable rates of return. These investments are mainly financed with a combination of equity, senior unsecured notes and borrowings under our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement. During inflationary periods, which generally are accompanied by rising interest rates, our ability to grow may be adversely affected because the yield on new investments may increase at a slower rate than new borrowing costs. Presuming the current inflation rate remains moderate and long-term interest rates do not increase significantly, we believe that inflation will not impact the availability of equity and debt financing for us.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We seek to mitigate the underlying foreign currency exposures with gains and losses on derivative contracts hedging these exposures. We seek to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest rates by matching the terms of new investments with new long-term fixed rate borrowings to the extent possible. We may or may not elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on our policy to match our variable rate investments with comparable borrowings, but are also based on the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates and our perception of the future volatility of interest rates. This section is presented to provide a discussion of the risks associated with potential fluctuations in interest rates.

We historically borrow on our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement to acquire, construct or make loans relating to health care and seniors housing properties. Then, as market conditions dictate, we will issue equity or long-term fixed rate debt to repay the borrowings under our unsecured line of credit arrangements.

A change in interest rates will not affect the interest expense associated with our fixed rate debt. Interest rate changes, however, will affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt. Changes in the interest rate environment upon maturity of this fixed rate debt could have an effect on our future cash flows and earnings, depending on whether the debt is replaced with other fixed rate debt, variable rate debt or equity or repaid by the sale of assets. To illustrate the impact of changes in the interest rate markets, we performed a sensitivity analysis on our fixed rate debt instruments whereby we modeled the change in net present values arising from a hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates to determine the instruments’ change in fair value. The following table summarizes the analysis performed as of the dates indicated (in thousands):

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Principal

Change in

Principal

Change in

balance

fair value

balance

fair value

Senior unsecured notes (1)

$

6,145,457

$

(451,478)

$

4,464,927

$

(342,460)

Secured debt

2,024,454

(96,290)

1,693,283

(82,583)

Totals

$

8,169,911

$

(547,768)

$

6,158,210

$

(425,043)

(1) 2012 amounts include the Canadian denominated unsecured term loan.

Our variable rate debt, including our unsecured line of credit arrangements, is reflected at fair value. At December 31, 2012, we had no amounts outstanding related to our variable rate lines of credit and $276,006,000 outstanding related to our variable rate secured debt. Assuming no changes in outstanding balances, a 1% increase in interest rates would result in increased annual interest expense of $2,760,000. At December 31, 2011, we had $610,000,000 outstanding related to our variable rate line of credit and $415,101,000 outstanding related to our variable rate secured debt. Assuming no changes in outstanding balances, a 1% increase in interest rates would have resulted in increased annual interest expense of $10,251,000.

See Note 11 of our consolidated financial statements for information on our derivative instruments.

We are subject to risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of current indebtedness. The majority of our borrowings were completed under indentures or contractual agreements that limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, in the event that we are unable to raise additional equity or borrow money because of these limitations, our ability to acquire additional properties may be limited.

For additional information regarding fair values of financial instruments, see “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

70


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Health Care REIT, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Health Care REIT, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Health Care REIT, Inc. at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Health Care REIT, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Toledo, Ohio

February 26, 2013

71


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31,

December 31,

2012

2011

Assets

(In thousands)

Real estate investments:

Real property owned:

Land and land improvements

$

1,365,391

$

1,116,756

Buildings and improvements

15,635,127

13,073,747

Acquired lease intangibles

673,684

428,199

Real property held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation

245,213

36,115

Construction in progress

162,984

189,502

Gross real property owned

18,082,399

14,844,319

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

(1,555,055)

(1,194,476)

Net real property owned

16,527,344

13,649,843

Real estate loans receivable

895,665

292,507

Net real estate investments

17,423,009

13,942,350

Other assets:

Investments in unconsolidated entities

438,936

241,722

Goodwill

68,321

68,321

Deferred loan expenses

66,327

58,584

Cash and cash equivalents

1,033,764

163,482

Restricted cash

107,657

69,620

Receivables and other assets

411,095

380,527

Total other assets

2,126,100

982,256

Total assets

$

19,549,109

$

14,924,606

Liabilities and equity

Liabilities:

Borrowings under unsecured line of credit arrangements

$

-

$

610,000

Senior unsecured notes

6,114,151

4,434,107

Secured debt

2,336,196

2,112,649

Capital lease obligations

81,552

83,996

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

462,099

371,557

Total liabilities

8,993,998

7,612,309

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

34,592

33,650

Equity:

Preferred stock

1,022,917

1,010,417

Common stock

260,396

192,299

Capital in excess of par value

10,543,690

7,019,714

Treasury stock

(17,875)

(13,535)

Cumulative net income

2,184,819

1,893,806

Cumulative dividends

(3,694,579)

(2,972,129)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(11,028)

(11,928)

Other equity

6,461

6,120

Total Health Care REIT, Inc. stockholders’ equity

10,294,801

7,124,764

Noncontrolling interests

225,718

153,883

Total equity

10,520,519

7,278,647

Total liabilities and equity

$

19,549,109

$

14,924,606

See accompanying notes

72


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Revenues:

Rental income

$

1,080,269

$

821,610

$

479,465

Resident fees and services

697,494

456,085

51,006

Interest income

39,065

41,070

40,855

Other income

5,271

11,295

7,245

Total revenues

1,822,099

1,330,060

578,571

Expenses:

Interest expense

367,083

297,373

133,978

Property operating expenses

570,117

377,739

77,787

Depreciation and amortization

515,888

393,882

165,165

General and administrative

97,341

77,201

54,626

Transaction costs

61,609

70,224

46,660

Loss (gain) on derivatives, net

(1,825)

-

-

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net

(775)

(979)

34,171

Provision for loan losses

27,008

2,010

29,684

Total expenses

1,636,446

1,217,450

542,071

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

and income from unconsolidated entities

185,653

112,610

36,500

Income tax (expense) benefit

(7,612)

(1,388)

(364)

Income from unconsolidated entities

2,482

5,772

6,673

Income from continuing operations

180,523

116,994

42,809

Discontinued operations:

Gain (loss) on sales of properties, net

100,549

61,160

36,115

Impairment of assets

(29,287)

(12,194)

(947)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net

43,055

46,756

50,907

Discontinued operations, net

114,317

95,722

86,075

Net income

294,840

212,716

128,884

Less:  Preferred stock dividends

69,129

60,502

21,645

Less:  Preferred stock redemption charge

6,242

-

-

Less:  Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)

(2,415)

(4,894)

357

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

221,884

$

157,108

$

106,882

Average number of common shares outstanding:

Basic

224,343

173,741

127,656

Diluted

225,953

174,401

128,208

Earnings per share:

Basic:

Income from continuing operations

attributable to common stockholders

$

0.48

$

0.35

$

0.16

Discontinued operations, net

0.51

0.55

0.67

Net income attributable to common stockholders*

$

0.99

$

0.90

$

0.84

Diluted:

Income from continuing operations

attributable to common stockholders

$

0.48

$

0.35

$

0.16

Discontinued operations, net

0.51

0.55

0.67

Net income attributable to common stockholders*

$

0.98

$

0.90

$

0.83

* Amounts may not sum due to rounding

(1) Includes amounts attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests

See accompanying notes

73


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Net income

$

294,840

$

212,716

$

128,884

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Unrecognized gain/(loss) on equity investments

403

(122)

54

Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:

Unrealized gain/(loss)

3,200

3,189

(10,307)

Reclassification adjustment realized in net income

(1,596)

(1,781)

2,244

Unrecognized actuarial gain/(loss)

(226)

(2,115)

(199)

Foreign currency translation gain/(loss)

(881)

-

-

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

900

(829)

(8,208)

Total comprehensive income

295,740

211,887

120,676

Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)

(2,415)

(4,894)

357

Total comprehensive income attributable to stockholders

$

293,325

$

206,993

$

121,033

(1) Includes amounts attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests.

See accompanying notes

74


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(in thousands)

Accumulated

Capital in

Other

Preferred

Common

Excess of

Treasury

Cumulative

Cumulative

Comprehensive

Other

Noncontrolling

Stock

Stock

Par Value

Stock

Net Income

Dividends

Income

Equity

Interests

Total

Balances at December 31, 2009

$

288,683

123,385

3,900,666

(7,619)

1,547,669

(2,057,658)

(2,891)

4,804

10,412

$

3,807,451

Comprehensive income:

Net income

128,527

357

128,884

Other comprehensive income:

(8,208)

(8,208)

Total comprehensive income

120,676

Contributions by noncontrolling interests

43,640

122,781

166,421

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(3,301)

(3,301)

Amounts related to issuance of common stock

from dividend reinvestment and stock

incentive plans, net of forfeitures

2,300

97,696

(3,733)

(741)

95,522

Net proceeds from sale of common stock

21,131

884,255

905,386

Equity component of convertible debt

(9,689)

(9,689)

Equity consideration in business combinations

16,667

2,721

19,388

Redemption of preferred stock

(165)

(165)

Conversion of preferred stock

(13,518)

339

13,179

-

Option compensation expense

1,634

1,634

Cash dividends paid:

Common stock cash dividends

(348,578)

(348,578)

Preferred stock cash dividends

(21,645)

(21,645)

Balances at December 31, 2010

291,667

147,155

4,932,468

(11,352)

1,676,196

(2,427,881)

(11,099)

5,697

130,249

4,733,100

Comprehensive income:

Net income

217,610

(3,591)

214,019

Other comprehensive income:

(829)

(829)

Total comprehensive income

213,190

Contributions by noncontrolling interests

6,468

65,361

71,829

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(38,136)

(38,136)

Amounts related to issuance of common stock

from dividend reinvestment and stock

incentive plans, net of forfeitures

2,895

138,989

(2,183)

(1,494)

138,207

Net proceeds from sale of common stock

42,249

1,964,102

2,006,351

Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares

718,750

(22,313)

696,437

Option compensation expense

1,917

1,917

Cash dividends paid:

Common stock cash dividends

(483,746)

(483,746)

Preferred stock cash dividends

(60,502)

(60,502)

Balances at December 31, 2011

1,010,417

192,299

7,019,714

(13,535)

1,893,806

(2,972,129)

(11,928)

6,120

153,883

7,278,647

Comprehensive income:

Net income

297,255

(1,480)

295,775

Other comprehensive income:

900

900

Total comprehensive income

296,675

Contributions by noncontrolling interests

222

89,934

90,156

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

(7,358)

(16,619)

(23,977)

Amounts related to issuance of common stock

from dividend reinvestment and stock

incentive plans, net of forfeitures

2,658

149,955

(4,340)

(2,534)

145,739

Net proceeds from sale of common stock

64,400

3,382,532

3,446,932

Net proceeds from sale of preferred stock

287,500

(9,813)

277,687

Equity component of convertible debt

1,039

2,236

3,275

Redemption of preferred stock

(275,000)

6,202

(6,242)

(275,040)

Option compensation expense

2,875

2,875

Cash dividends paid:

Common stock cash dividends

(653,321)

(653,321)

Preferred stock cash dividends

(69,129)

(69,129)

Balances at December 31, 2012

$

1,022,917

$

260,396

$

10,543,690

$

(17,875)

$

2,184,819

$

(3,694,579)

$

(11,028)

$

6,461

$

225,718

$

10,520,519

See accompanying notes

75


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands)

2012

2011

2010

Operating activities

Net income

$

294,840

$

212,716

$

128,884

Adjustments to reconcile net income to

net cash provided from (used in) operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

533,585

423,605

202,543

Other amortization expenses

15,185

16,851

17,169

Provision for loan losses

27,008

2,010

29,684

Impairment of assets

29,287

12,194

947

Stock-based compensation expense

18,521

10,786

11,823

Loss (gain) on derivatives, net

(1,825)

-

-

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net

(775)

(979)

34,171

Income from unconsolidated entities

(2,482)

(5,772)

(6,673)

Rental income in excess of cash received

(32,362)

(31,578)

(6,594)

Amortization related to above (below) market leases, net

165

(2,507)

(2,856)

Loss (gain) on sales of properties, net

(100,549)

(61,160)

(36,115)

Distributions by unconsolidated entities

17,607

6,149

-

Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities

38,213

10,653

12,293

Decrease (increase) in receivables and other assets

(18,285)

(4,744)

(20,535)

Net cash provided from (used in) operating activities

818,133

588,224

364,741

Investing activities

Investment in real property, net of cash acquired

(3,345,111)

(4,905,122)

(2,074,176)

Capitalized interest

(9,777)

(13,164)

(20,792)

Investment in real estate loans receivable

(665,094)

(51,477)

(97,265)

Other investments, net of payments

25,425

(22,986)

(133,894)

Principal collected on real estate loans receivable

35,020

188,811

43,495

Contributions to unconsolidated entities

(227,735)

(2,784)

(196,413)

Distributions by unconsolidated entities

13,136

9,135

103

Proceeds from (payments on) derivatives

6,652

-

-

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

(35,766)

30,248

(52,124)

Proceeds from sales of real property

610,271

247,210

219,027

Net cash provided from (used in) investing activities

(3,592,979)

(4,520,129)

(2,312,039)

Financing activities

Net increase (decrease) under unsecured lines of credit arrangements

(610,000)

310,000

160,000

Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes

2,025,708

1,381,086

1,821,683

Payments to extinguish senior unsecured notes

(370,524)

(3)

(495,542)

Net proceeds from the issuance of secured debt

157,418

119,030

154,306

Payments on secured debt

(406,210)

(83,998)

(217,711)

Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock

3,581,292

2,137,594

995,438

Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock

277,687

696,437

-

Redemption of preferred stock

(275,000)

-

-

Decrease (increase) in deferred loan expenses

(7,152)

(28,867)

(3,869)

Contributions by noncontrolling interests (1)

24,115

8,604

2,611

Distributions to noncontrolling interests (1)

(29,353)

(30,705)

(3,301)

Cash distributions to stockholders

(722,450)

(544,248)

(370,223)

Other financing activities

(403)

(1,113)

-

Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities

3,645,128

3,963,817

2,043,392

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

870,282

31,912

96,094

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

163,482

131,570

35,476

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

1,033,764

$

163,482

$

131,570

Supplemental cash flow information:

Interest paid

$

369,511

$

285,884

$

156,207

Income taxes paid

3,071

389

319

(1) Includes amounts attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests.

See accompanying notes.

76


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Business

Health Care REIT, Inc., an S&P 500 company with headquarters in Toledo, Ohio, is an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that invests in seniors housing and health care real estate. Our full service platform offers property management and development services to our customers. As of December 31, 2012, our diversified portfolio consisted of 1,025 properties in 46 states, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Founded in 1970, we were the first real estate investment trust to invest exclusively in health care facilities.

2. Accounting Policies and Related Matters

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint venture entities that we control, through voting rights or other means. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

At inception of joint venture transactions, we identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of its operations. A VIE is broadly defined as an entity where either (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest, or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. We consolidate investments in VIEs when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary.  Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810, Consolidations (“ASC 810”), requires enterprises to perform a qualitative approach to determining whether or not a VIE will need to be consolidated on a continuous basis. This evaluation is based on an enterprise’s ability to direct and influence the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact that entity’s economic performance.

For investments in joint ventures, we evaluate the type of rights held by the limited partner(s), which may preclude consolidation in circumstances in which the sole general partner would otherwise consolidate the limited partnership. The assessment of limited partners’ rights and their impact on the presumption of control over a limited partnership by the sole general partner should be made when an investor becomes the sole general partner and should be reassessed if (i) there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, (ii) the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership in the limited partnership, or (iii) there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We similarly evaluate the rights of managing members of limited liability companies.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires that revenue be recognized after four basic criteria are met. These four criteria include persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectability. Interest income on loans is recognized as earned based upon the principal amount outstanding subject to an evaluation of collectability risk. Substantially all of our operating leases contain escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.  Leases in our medical office building portfolio typically include some form of operating expense reimbursement by the tenant.  Certain payments made to operators are treated as lease incentives and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term.  We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided.  Lease agreements with residents generally have a term of one year and are cancelable by the resident with 30 days’ notice.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash primarily consists of amounts held by lenders to provide future payments for real estate taxes, insurance, tenant and capital improvements and amounts held in escrow relating to acquisitions we are entitled to receive over a period of time as outlined in the escrow agreement.

Deferred Loan Expenses

77


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Deferred loan expenses are costs incurred by us in connection with the issuance, assumption and amendments of debt arrangements. We amortize these costs over the term of the debt using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

Investments in less than majority owned entities where our interests represent a general partnership interest but substantive participating or kick-out rights have been granted to the limited partners, or where our interests do not represent the general partnership interest and we do not control the major operating and financial policies of the entity, are reported under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our consolidated results of operations. To the extent that our cost basis is different from the basis reflected at the entity level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the lives of the related assets and liabilities, and such amortization is included in our share of equity in earnings of the entity.  The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities is based on the amount paid to purchase the entity interest or the estimated fair value of the assets prior to the sale of interests in the entity. Other equity investments include an investment in available-for-sale securities. These equity investments represented a minimal ownership interest in these companies. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the equity method investment to its carrying value. When we determine a decline in the estimated fair value of such an investment below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

Certain noncontrolling interests are redeemable at fair value.  Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interests at the greater of (i) the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interest’s share of net income or loss and its share of other comprehensive income or loss and dividends or (ii) the redemption value.  In accordance with ASC 810, the redeemable noncontrolling interests were classified outside of permanent equity, as a mezzanine item, in the balance sheet.

Real Property Owned

Real property developed by us is recorded at cost, including the capitalization of construction period interest. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.  Property acquisitions are accounted for as business combinations where we measure the assets acquired, liabilities (including assumed debt and contingencies) and any noncontrolling interests at their fair values on the acquisition date.  The cost of real property acquired, which represents substantially all of the purchase price, is allocated to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their respective fair values. These properties are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives which range from 15 to 40 years for buildings and 5 to 15 years for improvements. Tangible assets primarily consist of land, buildings and improvements, including those related to capital leases.  We consider costs incurred in conjunction with re-leasing properties, including tenant improvements and lease commissions, to represent the acquisition of productive assets and, accordingly, such costs are reflected as investment activities in our statement of cash flows.

The remaining purchase price is allocated among identifiable intangible assets primarily consisting of the above or below market component of in-place leases and the value associated with the presence of in-place tenants or residents.  The value allocable to the above or below market component of the acquired in-place lease is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term, and (ii) management’s estimate of the amounts that would be paid using fair market rates over the remaining term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above market leases are included in acquired lease intangibles and below market leases are included in other liabilities in the balance sheet and are amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.

The total amount of other intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship values for in-place tenants based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics considered by management in allocating these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors.  The total amount of other intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place lease values for in-place residents with such value representing (i) value associated with lost revenue related to tenant reimbursable operating costs that would be incurred in an assumed re-leasing period, and (ii) value associated with lost rental revenue from existing leases during an assumed re-leasing period.  This intangible asset will be amortized over the assumed re-leasing period.

The net book value of long-lived assets is reviewed quarterly on a property by property basis to determine if facts and circumstances suggest that the assets may be impaired or that the depreciable life may need to be changed. We consider external factors relating to each asset and the existence of a master lease which may link the cash flows of an individual asset to a larger portfolio of assets leased to the same tenant. If these factors and the projected undiscounted cash flows of the asset over the remaining

78


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

depreciation period indicate that the asset will not be recoverable, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated fair market value. In addition, we are exposed to the risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate, and in particular, the seniors housing and health care industries. A downturn in the real estate industry could adversely affect the value of our properties and our ability to sell properties for a price or on terms acceptable to us.

Capitalization of Construction Period Interest

We capitalize interest costs associated with funds used for the construction of properties owned directly by us. The amount capitalized is based upon the balance outstanding during the construction period using the rate of interest which approximates our cost of financing. We capitalize interest costs related to construction of real property owned by us. Our interest expense reflected in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income has been reduced by the amounts capitalized.

Gain on Sale of Assets

We recognize sales of assets only upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits and classified as other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. Gains on assets sold are recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when (i) the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured, (ii) we are not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit, (iii) we have received adequate initial investment from the purchaser and (iv) other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. Gains may be deferred in whole or in part until the sales satisfy the requirements of gain recognition on sales of real estate.

Real Estate Loans Receivable

Real estate loans receivable consist of mortgage loans and other real estate loans. Interest income on loans is recognized as earned based upon the principal amount outstanding subject to an evaluation of collectability risks. The loans are primarily collateralized by a first, second or third mortgage lien, a leasehold mortgage on, or an assignment of the partnership interest in, the related properties, corporate guaranties and/or personal guaranties.

Allowance for Losses on Loans Receivable

The allowance for losses on loans receivable is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our loans receivable. The determination of the allowance is based on a quarterly evaluation of these loans, including general economic conditions and estimated collectability of loan payments. We evaluate the collectability of our loans receivable based on a combination of factors, including, but not limited to, delinquency status, historical loan charge-offs, financial strength of the borrower and guarantors and value of the underlying collateral. If such factors indicate that there is greater risk of loan charge-offs, additional allowances or placement on non-accrual status may be required. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due as scheduled according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. Consistent with this definition, all loans on non-accrual are deemed impaired. To the extent circumstances improve and the risk of collectability is diminished, we will return these loans to full accrual status. While a loan is on non-accrual status, any cash receipts are applied against the outstanding principal balance.

Goodwill

We account for goodwill in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and is tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount, including goodwill, exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value and the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of that goodwill.  We have not had any goodwill impairments.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

Derivatives are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities.  The valuation of derivative instruments requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments.  Fair values of our derivatives are estimated by pricing models that consider the forward yield curves and discount rates.  The fair value of our forward exchange contracts are estimated by pricing models that consider foreign currency spot rates, forward trade rates and discount rates.  Such amounts and the recognition of such amounts are subject to significant estimates that may change in the future. See Note 11 for additional information.

Federal Income Tax

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with our first taxable year, and made no provision for federal income tax purposes prior to our acquisition of our “taxable REIT subsidiaries.” As a result of these as well as subsequent acquisitions, we now record income tax expense or benefit with respect to certain of our entities that are taxed as taxable REIT subsidiaries under provisions similar to those applicable to regular corporations and not under the REIT provisions.

79


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes a change in our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.  See Note 18 for additional information.

Foreign Currency

Certain of our subsidiaries’ functional currencies are the local currencies of their respective countries. We translate the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using average rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. We record resulting currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity, on our consolidated balance sheets. We record transaction gains and losses in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the number of shares is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.

New Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS” (“ASU 2011-04”), which requires incremental fair value disclosures in the notes to the financial statements.  We have adopted ASU 2011-04 effective January 1, 2012.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which requires entities to present net income and other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income.  We have adopted ASU 2011-05 effective January 1, 2012 and presented total comprehensive income on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.  Further disclosures including reconciliation from net income to total comprehensive income will be required on an annual basis.  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU 2011-05” delayed the requirement to present certain reclassifications on the face of the financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

3. Real Property Acquisitions and Development

The total purchase price for all properties acquired has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests based upon their respective fair values in accordance with our accounting policies. The results of operations for these acquisitions have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the date of acquisition and are a component of the appropriate segments.  Transaction costs primarily represent costs incurred with property acquisitions, including due diligence costs, fees for legal and valuation services and termination of pre-existing relationships computed based on the fair value of the assets acquired, lease termination fees and other acquisition-related costs.  During the year ended December 31, 2012, we finalized our purchase price allocation of certain previously reported acquisitions and there were no material changes from those previously disclosed.

80


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Seniors Housing Triple-net Activity

The following is our purchase price allocations and other seniors housing triple-net real property investment activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012 (1)

2011

2010

Land and land improvements

$

87,242

$

212,156

$

61,290

Buildings and improvements

984,077

3,108,508

967,239

Receivables and other assets

119

9,101

-

Total assets acquired (2)

1,071,438

3,329,765

1,028,529

Secured debt

(89,881)

(93,431)

(84,086)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

(3,542)

(91,290)

(26,345)

Total liabilities assumed

(93,423)

(184,721)

(110,431)

Capital in excess of par

921

-

-

Noncontrolling interests

(17,215)

-

-

Non-cash acquisition related activity

(616)

(2,532)

(9,922)

Cash disbursed for acquisitions

961,105

3,142,512

908,176

Construction in progress additions

179,684

182,626

85,993

Less:  Capitalized interest

(6,041)

(5,752)

(6,396)

Cash disbursed for construction in progress

173,643

176,874

79,597

Capital improvements to existing properties

67,026

-

21,833

Total cash invested in real property, net of cash acquired

$

1,201,774

$

3,319,386

$

1,009,606

(1) Includes acquisitions with an aggregate purchase price of $37,772,000 for which the allocation of the purchase price consideration is preliminary and subject to change.

(2) Excludes $2,031,000 of cash acquired during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Seniors Housing Operating Activity

Acquisitions of seniors housing operating properties are structured under RIDEA, which is described in Note 18.  This structure results in the inclusion of all resident revenues and related property operating expenses from the operation of these qualified health care properties in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.  Certain of our subsidiaries’ functional currencies are the local currencies of their respective countries. See Note 2 for information regarding our foreign currency policies.

The following is a summary of our seniors housing operating real property investment activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012 (1)

2011

2010

Land and land improvements

$

146,332

$

112,350

$

75,620

Buildings and improvements

1,341,560

1,512,764

676,623

Acquired lease intangibles

118,077

122,371

63,757

Restricted cash

1,296

20,699

-

Receivables and other assets

10,125

901

16,459

Total assets acquired (2)

1,617,390

1,769,085

832,459

Secured debt

(124,190)

(796,272)

(305,167)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

(17,347)

(44,483)

(6,849)

Total liabilities assumed

(141,537)

(840,755)

(312,016)

Capital in excess of par

-

(6,017)

(43,641)

Noncontrolling interests

(56,884)

(69,984)

(101,091)

Cash disbursed for acquisitions

1,418,969

852,329

375,711

Capital improvements to existing properties

21,751

15,880

1,735

Total cash invested in real property, net of cash acquired

$

1,440,720

$

868,209

$

377,446

(1) Includes acquisitions with an aggregate purchase price of $1,370,128,000 for which the allocation of the purchase price consideration is preliminary and subject to change.

(2) Excludes $20,691,000, $38,952,000 and $8,532,000 of cash acquired during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

81


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Medical Facilities Activity

Accrued contingent consideration related to certain medical facility acquisitions was $34,692,000 and $39,827,000 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Of the amount recognized, $12,500,000 is required to be settled in the Company’s common stock upon the achievement of certain performance thresholds.  The following is a summary of our medical facilities real property investment activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012 (1)

2011

2010

Land and land improvements

$

68,619

$

48,342

$

49,632

Buildings and improvements

648,409

520,976

513,152

Acquired lease intangibles

115,233

60,609

67,929

Restricted cash

975

100

-

Goodwill (2)

-

-

68,321

Receivables and other assets

4,469

3,053

-

Total assets acquired (3)

837,705

633,080

699,034

Secured debt

(267,527)

(72,225)

(170,255)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

(25,928)

(34,214)

(75,010)

Total liabilities assumed

(293,455)

(106,439)

(245,265)

Capital in excess of par

-

-

(2,721)

Noncontrolling interests

(193)

(7,211)

(10,848)

Preferred stock

-

-

(16,667)

Non-cash acquisition related activity

(880)

-

-

Cash disbursed for acquisitions

543,177

519,430

423,533

Construction in progress additions

134,830

165,593

252,595

Less:  Capitalized interest

(3,736)

(7,412)

(13,924)

Accruals

(18,327)

(33,451)

(11,435)

Cash disbursed for construction in progress

112,767

124,730

227,236

Capital improvements to existing properties

46,673

24,031

36,354

Total cash invested in real property, net of cash acquired

$

702,617

$

668,191

$

687,123

(1) Includes acquisitions with an aggregate purchase price of $190,799,000 for which the allocation of the purchase price consideration  is preliminary and subject to change.

(2) Goodwill represents the estimated fair value of the future development pipeline expected to be generated. Cash flows from this future pipeline are expected to come from development activities and the ability to perform the management functions at the assets after the properties are developed.

(3) Excludes $2,154,000 of cash acquired during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Construction Activity

The following is a summary of the construction projects that were placed into service and began generating revenues during the periods presented:

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Development projects:

Seniors housing triple-net

$

146,913

$

114,161

$

273,034

Medical facilities

189,135

355,935

162,376

Total development projects

336,048

470,096

435,410

Expansion projects

4,983

45,414

3,216

Total construction in progress conversions

$

341,031

$

515,510

$

438,626

82


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At December 31, 2012, future minimum lease payments receivable under operating leases (excluding properties in our seniors housing operating partnerships and excluding any operating expense reimbursements) are as follows (in thousands):

2013

$

1,039,427

2014

980,258

2015

952,029

2016

950,079

2017

929,224

Thereafter

7,579,800

Totals

$

12,430,817

4. Real Estate Intangibles

The following is a summary of our real estate intangibles, excluding those classified as held for sale, as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Assets:

In place lease intangibles

$

541,729

$

332,645

Above market tenant leases

56,086

35,973

Below market ground leases

61,450

51,316

Lease commissions

14,419

8,265

Gross historical cost

673,684

428,199

Accumulated amortization

(257,242)

(148,380)

Net book value

$

416,442

$

279,819

Weighted-average amortization period in years

16.4

17.0

Liabilities:

Below market tenant leases

$

77,036

$

67,284

Above market ground leases

9,490

5,020

Gross historical cost

86,526

72,304

Accumulated amortization

(27,753)

(21,387)

Net book value

$

58,773

$

50,917

Weighted-average amortization period in years

14.3

12.3

The following is a summary of real estate intangible amortization for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Rental income related to above/below market tenant leases, net

$

1,120

$

3,340

$

3,829

Property operating expenses related to above/below market ground leases, net

(1,285)

(1,161)

(1,049)

Depreciation and amortization related to in place lease intangibles and lease commissions

(103,044)

(98,856)

(18,298)

83


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The future estimated aggregate amortization of intangible assets and liabilities is as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):

Assets

Liabilities

2013

$

112,730

$

7,200

2014

62,787

6,616

2015

29,220

5,645

2016

23,201

5,233

2017

23,453

4,920

Thereafter

165,051

29,159

Totals

$

416,442

$

58,773

5. Dispositions, Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

Impairment of assets as reflected in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income relate to properties designated as held for sale and represent the charges necessary to adjust the carrying values to estimated fair values less costs to sell based on current sales price expectations.  The following is a summary of our real property disposition activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Real property dispositions:

Seniors housing triple-net

$

372,378

$

150,755

$

170,290

Medical facilities

149,344

35,295

14,092

Total dispositions

521,722

186,050

184,382

Add: Gain (loss) on sales of real property, net

100,549

61,160

36,115

Seller financing on sales of real property

(12,000)

-

(1,470)

Proceeds from real property sales

$

610,271

$

247,210

$

219,027

At December 31, 2012, $46,201,000 of sales proceeds is on deposit in an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchange account escrow account with a qualified intermediary.  We have reclassified the income and expenses attributable to all properties sold prior to or held for sale at December 31, 2012 to discontinued operations.  Expenses include an allocation of interest expense based on property carrying values and our weighted-average cost of debt.  The following illustrates the reclassification impact as a result of classifying properties as discontinued operations for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Revenues:

Rental income

$

79,323

$

107,236

$

123,945

Expenses:

Interest expense

16,217

24,626

26,982

Property operating expenses

2,354

6,131

8,678

Provision for depreciation

17,697

29,723

37,378

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net

$

43,055

$

46,756

$

50,907

6. Real Estate Loans Receivable

The following is a summary of our real estate loans receivable (in thousands):

December 31,

2012

2011

Mortgage loans

$

87,955

$

63,934

Other real estate loans

807,710

228,573

Totals

$

895,665

$

292,507

84


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following is a summary of our real estate loan activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Seniors

Seniors

Seniors

Seniors

Housing

Housing

Medical

Housing

Medical

Housing

Medical

Triple-net

Operating (1)

Facilities

Totals

Triple-net

Facilities

Totals

Triple-net

Facilities

Totals

Advances:

Investments in new loans

$

2,220

$

580,834

$

38,336

$

621,390

$

18,541

$

-

$

18,541

$

9,742

$

41,644

$

51,386

Draws on existing loans

41,754

-

1,950

43,704

29,752

3,184

32,936

46,113

1,236

47,349

Sub-total

43,974

580,834

40,286

665,094

48,293

3,184

51,477

55,855

42,880

98,735

Less: Seller financing on property sales

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1,470)

(1,470)

Net cash advances on real estate loans

43,974

580,834

40,286

665,094

48,293

3,184

51,477

55,855

41,410

97,265

Receipts:

Loan payoffs

10,387

-

2,168

12,555

162,705

2,943

165,648

5,619

6,233

11,852

Principal payments on loans

19,786

-

2,679

22,465

17,856

5,307

23,163

24,203

7,440

31,643

Total receipts on real estate loans

30,173

-

4,847

35,020

180,561

8,250

188,811

29,822

13,673

43,495

Net advances (receipts) on real estate loans

$

13,801

$

580,834

$

35,439

$

630,074

$

(132,268)

$

(5,066)

$

(137,334)

$

26,033

$

27,737

$

53,770

(1) Represents loan to Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. that was acquired upon merger consummation on January 9, 2013 as discussed in Note 21.

The following is a summary of the allowance for losses on loans receivable for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012 (1)

2011 (2)

2010 (3)

Balance at beginning of  year

$

-

$

1,276

$

5,183

Provision for loan losses

27,008

2,010

29,684

Charge-offs

(27,008)

(3,286)

(33,591)

Balance at end of  year

$

-

$

-

$

1,276

(1) Provision and charge-off amounts relate to one entrance fee community in our seniors housing triple-net segment.

(2) Provision and charge-off amounts relate to one hospital in our medical facilities segment.

(3) Provision and charge-off amounts relate to certain early stage seniors housing and CCRC development projects in our seniors housing triple-net segment.

The following is a summary of our loan impairments (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Balance of impaired loans at end of  year

$

4,230

$

6,244

$

9,691

Allowance for loan losses

-

-

1,276

Balance of impaired loans not reserved

$

4,230

$

6,244

$

8,415

Average impaired loans for the year

$

5,237

$

7,968

$

38,409

Interest recognized on impaired loans (1)

44

-

103

(1) Represents interest recognized prior to placement on non-accrual status.

85


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we entered into a joint venture investment with Forest City Enterprises (NYSE:FCE.A and FCE.B). We acquired a 49% interest in a seven-building life science campus located at University Park in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which is immediately adjacent to the campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At December 31, 2012, our investment of $174,692,000 is recorded as an investment in unconsolidated entities on the balance sheet. The aggregate remaining unamortized basis difference of our investment in this joint venture of $448,000 at December 31, 2012 is primarily attributable to real estate and related intangible assets and will be amortized over the life of the related properties and included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

On December 31, 2010, we formed a strategic partnership with a national medical office building company whereby the partnership invested in 17 medical office properties.  We own a controlling interest in 11 properties and consolidate them.  Consolidation is based on a combination of ownership interest and control of operational decision-making authority.  We do not own a controlling interest in six properties and account for them under the equity method.  Our investment in the strategic partnership provides us access to health systems and includes development and property management resources.

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we entered into a joint venture with Chartwell Retirement Residences (TSX:CSH.UN). The portfolio contains 42 properties in Canada, 39 of which are owned 50% by us and Chartwell, and three of which we wholly own. All properties are managed by Chartwell. In connection with the 39 properties, we invested $223,134,000 of cash which was recorded as an investment in unconsolidated entities on the balance sheet. The 39 properties are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and do not qualify as VIEs (variable interest entities). The joint venture is structured under RIDEA. The aggregate remaining unamortized basis difference of our investment in this joint venture of $8,656,000 at December 31, 2012 is primarily attributable to transaction costs that will be amortized over the weighted-average useful life of the related properties and included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

The results of operations for these properties have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition by the joint ventures and are reflected in our statements of comprehensive income as income or loss from unconsolidated entities. The following is a summary of our income from and investments in unconsolidated entities (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

December 31,

Percentage Ownership

Properties

2012 Income (loss)

2011 Income (loss)

2010 Income (loss)

2012 Assets

2011 Assets

Seniors housing triple-net (1)

10% to 49%

21

$

(33)

$

(9)

$

-

$

34,618

$

30,975

Seniors housing operating

33% to 50%

39

(6,364)

(1,531)

-

217,701

15,429

Medical facilities

36% to 49%

13

8,879

7,312

6,673

186,617

195,318

Total

$

2,482

$

5,772

$

6,673

$

438,936

$

241,722

(1) Asset amounts include an available-for-sale equity investment. See Note 16 for additional information.

86


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8. Customer Concentration

The following table summarizes certain information about our customer concentration as of December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Number of

Total

Percent of

Concentration by investment: (1)

Properties

Investment (2)

Investment (3)

Genesis HealthCare

177

$

2,682,822

15%

Sunrise Senior Living

10

1,087,357

6%

Merrill Gardens

48

1,084,536

6%

Belmont Village

19

896,692

5%

Benchmark Senior Living

35

842,760

5%

Remaining portfolio

684

10,828,842

63%

Totals

973

$

17,423,009

100%

_____________________

(1) Genesis is in our seniors housing triple-net segment whereas the other top five customers are in our seniors housing operating segment.

(2) Excludes our share of investments in unconsolidated entities.  Please see Note 7 for additional information.

(3) Investments with our top five customers comprised 41% of total investments at December 31, 2011.

9. Borrowings Under Line of Credit Arrangement and Related Items

Please see Note 21 regarding line of credit activity that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2012.  At December 31, 2012, we had a $2,000,000,000 unsecured line of credit arrangement with a consortium of 31 banks with an option to upsize the facility by up to an additional $500,000,000 through an accordion feature, allowing for an aggregate commitment of up to $2,500,000,000.  The revolving credit facility was scheduled to expire July 27, 2015.  Borrowings under the agreement are subject to interest payable in periods no longer than three months at either the agent bank’s prime rate of interest or the applicable margin over LIBOR interest rate, at our option (1.56% at December 31, 2012). The applicable margin is based on certain of our debt ratings and was 1.35% at December 31, 2012. In addition, we pay a facility fee annually to each bank based on the bank’s commitment amount. The facility fee depends on certain of our debt ratings and was 0.25% at December 31, 2012.  Principal is due upon expiration of the agreement.  In addition, at December 31, 2012, we had a $5,000,000 unsecured revolving demand note undrawn and bearing interest at 1-month LIBOR plus 110 basis points.

The following information relates to aggregate borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Balance outstanding at year end

$

-

$

610,000

$

300,000

Maximum amount outstanding at any month end

$

897,000

$

710,000

$

560,000

Average amount outstanding (total of daily

principal balances divided by days in period)

$

191,378

$

240,104

$

268,762

Weighted-average interest rate (actual interest

expense divided by average borrowings outstanding)

1.80%

1.51%

1.48%

87


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. Senior Unsecured Notes and Secured Debt

We may repurchase, redeem or refinance convertible and non-convertible senior unsecured notes from time to time, taking advantage of favorable market conditions when available. We may purchase senior notes for cash through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, a tender offer or, in some cases, through the early redemption of such securities pursuant to their terms.   The non-convertible senior unsecured notes are redeemable at our option, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (1) the principal amount of the notes (or portion of such notes) being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon up to the redemption date and (2) any “make-whole” amount due under the terms of the notes in connection with early redemptions.   Redemptions and repurchases of debt, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.  At December 31, 2012, the annual principal payments due on these debt obligations were as follows (in thousands):

Senior

Secured

Unsecured Notes (1,2)

Debt (1,3)

Totals

2013

$

300,000

$

110,034

$

410,034

2014

-

204,783

204,783

2015 (4)

501,054

224,486

725,540

2016

700,000

328,730

1,028,730

2017

450,000

320,943

770,943

Thereafter

4,194,403

1,122,610

5,317,013

Totals

$

6,145,457

$

2,311,586

$

8,457,043

(1) Amounts represent principal amounts due and do not include unamortized premiums/discounts or other fair value adjustments as reflected on the consolidated balance sheet.

(2) Annual interest rates range from 2.25% to 6.5%, excluding the Canadian denominated unsecured term loan.

(3) Annual interest rates range from 1.0% to 10.0%.  Carrying value of the properties securing the debt totaled $3,953,516,000 at December 31, 2012.

(4) On July 30, 2012, we completed funding on a $250,000,000 Canadian denominated unsecured term loan (approximately $251,054,000 USD at exchange rates on December 31, 2012). The loan matures on July 27, 2015 (with an option to extend for an additional year at our discretion) and bears interest at the Canadian Dealer Offered Rate plus 145 basis points (2.67% at December 31, 2012).

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, we issued $494,403,000 of 3.00% senior unsecured convertible notes due December 2029, generating net proceeds of $486,084,000. The notes are convertible, in certain circumstances, into cash and, if applicable, shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate of 19.5064 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which represents an initial conversion price of $51.27 per share. In general, upon conversion, the holder of each note would receive, in respect of the conversion value of such note, cash up to the principal amount of such note and common stock for the note’s conversion value in excess of such principal amount. In addition, on each of December 1, 2014, December 1, 2019 and December 1, 2024, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. The notes are bifurcated into a debt component and an equity component since they may be settled in cash upon conversion. The value of the debt component is based upon the estimated fair value of a similar debt instrument without the conversion feature at the time of issuance. The difference between the contractual principal on the debt and the value allocated to the debt of $29,925,000 was recorded as an equity component and represents the conversion feature of the instrument. The excess of the contractual principal amount of the debt over its estimated fair value is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the period used to estimate the fair value.

The following is a summary of our senior unsecured note principal activity, excluding the Canadian denominated unsecured term loan, during the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Beginning balance

$

4,464,927

5.133%

$

3,064,930

5.129%

$

1,661,853

5.557%

Debt issued

1,800,000

3.691%

1,400,000

5.143%

1,844,403

4.653%

Debt extinguished

(76,853)

8.000%

(3)

4.750%

(441,326)

4.750%

Debt redeemed

(293,671)

4.750%

-

0.000%

-

0.000%

Ending balance

$

5,894,403

4.675%

$

4,464,927

5.133%

$

3,064,930

5.129%

88


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following is a summary of our secured debt principal activity for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Amount

Interest Rate

Beginning balance

$

2,108,384

5.285%

$

1,133,715

5.972%

$

623,045

5.842%

Debt issued

157,418

4.212%

116,903

5.697%

157,156

5.454%

Debt assumed

444,744

5.681%

940,854

4.444%

564,656

6.089%

Debt extinguished

(360,403)

4.672%

(55,317)

5.949%

(194,493)

6.073%

Foreign currency

187

5.637%

-

0.000%

-

0.000%

Principal payments

(38,744)

5.456%

(27,771)

5.845%

(16,649)

5.792%

Ending balance

$

2,311,586

5.140%

$

2,108,384

5.285%

$

1,133,715

5.972%

Our debt agreements contain various covenants, restrictions and events of default. Certain agreements require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements.

11. Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. We may elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on our policy to manage the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates and our perception of the future volatility of interest rates.  In addition, non-U.S. investments expose us to the potential losses associated with adverse changes in foreign currency to U.S. Dollar exchange rates.  We elected to manage this risk through the use of a forward exchange contract and issuing debt in the foreign currency.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

For instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), and reclassified into earnings in the same period, or periods, during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.  Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings.  As of December 31, 2012, we had one interest rate swap for a total aggregate notional amount of $11,905,000.  The swap hedges interest payments associated with long-term LIBOR based borrowings and matures on December 31, 2013.   Approximately $1,973,000 of losses, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), are expected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months.

Foreign Currency Hedges

For instruments that are designated and qualify as net investment hedges, the variability in the foreign currency to U.S. dollar of the instrument is recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment component of OCI.  The balance of the cumulative translation adjustment will be reclassified to earnings when the hedged investment is sold or substantially liquidated.  On February 15, 2012, we entered into a forward exchange contract to purchase $250,000,000 Canadian Dollars at a fixed rate in the future.  The forward contract was used to limit exposure to fluctuations in the Canadian Dollar to U.S. Dollar exchange rate associated with our initial cash investment funded for the Chartwell transaction.  On May 3, 2012, this forward exchange contract was settled for a gain of $2,772,000, which was reflected on the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, and the proceeds were used to fund our investment.    On May 3, 2012, we also entered into a forward contract to sell $250,000,000 Canadian dollars at a fixed rate on July 31, 2012 to hedge our net investment. We settled the forward contract on July 31, 2012 with the net loss reflected in OCI. Upon settlement of the forward contract we entered into a $250,000,000 Canadian Dollar term loan which has been designated as a net investment hedge of our Chartwell investment and changes in fair value are reported in OCI as no ineffectiveness is anticipated.

On August 30, 2012, we entered into two cross currency swaps to purchase £125,000,000.  The swaps were used to limit exposure to fluctuations in the Pound Sterling to U.S. Dollar exchange rate associated with our initial cash investment funded for the Sunrise transaction discussed in Note 21. The cross currency swaps have been designated as a net investment hedge, and changes in fair value are reported in OCI as no ineffectiveness is anticipated.

89


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On September 17, 2012, we entered into two forward exchange contracts to purchase $14,000,000 Canadian Dollars and £23,000,000 at a fixed rate in the future.  The forward contracts were used to limit exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency associated with future international transactions.

The following presents the impact of derivative instruments on the statement of comprehensive income and OCI for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended

Location

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Gain (loss) on interest rate swap recognized in OCI (effective portion)

OCI

$

3,200

$

3,189

$

(10,307)

Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps reclassified from AOCI into income (effective portion)

Interest expense

(1,596)

1,781

(2,244)

Gain (loss) on forward exchange contracts recognized in income

Realized gain

1,921

-

-

Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps recognized in income

Realized loss

(96)

-

-

Gain (loss) on forward exchange contracts designated as net investment hedge recognized in OCI

OCI

(5,134)

-

-

12. Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, 2012, we had nine outstanding letter of credit obligations totaling $7,172,000 and expiring between 2013 and 2014.  At December 31, 2012, we had outstanding construction in process of $162,984,000 for leased properties and were committed to providing additional funds of approximately $213,255,000 to complete construction. At December 31, 2012, we had contingent purchase obligations totaling $79,963,000, excluding our Sunrise-related commitment described in Note 21. These contingent purchase obligations relate to unfunded capital improvement obligations and contingent obligations on acquisitions. Rents due from the tenant are increased to reflect the additional investment in the property.

We evaluate our leases for operating versus capital lease treatment in accordance with ASC Topic 840 “Leases.”  A lease is classified as a capital lease if it provides for transfer of ownership of the leased asset at the end of the lease term, contains a bargain purchase option, has a lease term greater than 75% of the economic life of the leased asset, or if the net present value of the future minimum lease payments are in excess of 90% of the fair value of the leased asset. Certain leases contain bargain purchase options and have been classified as capital leases.  At December 31, 2012, we had operating lease obligations of $699,990,000 relating to certain ground leases and Company office space. We incurred rental expense relating to company office space of $1,534,000, $1,901,000 and $1,280,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Regarding the ground leases, we have sublease agreements with certain of our operators that require the operators to reimburse us for our monthly operating lease obligations. At December 31, 2012, aggregate future minimum rentals to be received under these noncancelable subleases totaled $47,632,000.

At December 31, 2012, future minimum lease payments due under operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands):

Operating Leases

Capital Leases (1)

2013

$

11,046

$

73,562

2014

11,267

1,219

2015

11,072

8,984

2016

11,168

559

2017

11,180

559

Thereafter

644,257

970

Totals

$

699,990

$

85,853

(1) Amounts above represent principal and interest obligations under capital lease arrangements.  Related assets with a gross value of $186,343,000 and accumulated depreciation of $8,639,000 are recorded in real property.

90


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13. Stockholders’ Equity

The following is a summary of our stockholder’s equity capital accounts as of the dates indicated:

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value:

Authorized shares

50,000,000

50,000,000

Issued shares

26,224,854

25,724,854

Outstanding shares

26,224,854

25,724,854

Common Stock, $1.00 par value:

Authorized shares

400,000,000

400,000,000

Issued shares

260,780,109

192,604,918

Outstanding shares

260,373,754

192,275,248

Preferred Stock. The following is a summary of our preferred stock activity during the periods presented (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Weighted Avg.

Shares

Dividend Rate

Shares

Dividend Rate

Shares

Dividend Rate

Beginning balance

25,724,854

7.013%

11,349,854

7.663%

11,474,093

7.697%

Shares issued

11,500,000

6.500%

14,375,000

6.500%

349,854

6.000%

Shares redeemed

(11,000,000)

7.716%

-

0.000%

(5,513)

7.500%

Shares converted

-

0.000%

-

0.000%

(468,580)

7.262%

Ending balance

26,224,854

6.493%

25,724,854

7.013%

11,349,854

7.663%

91


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we issued 349,854 shares of 6.00% Series H Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock in connection with a business combination.  These shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares to the redemption date, on or after December 31, 2015.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued 14,375,000 of 6.50% Series I Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock.  These shares have a liquidation value of $50.00 per share.  Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears.  The preferred stock is not redeemable by us.  The preferred shares are convertible, at the holder’s option, into 0.8460 shares of common stock (equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $59.10).

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we issued 11,500,000 of 6.50% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.  Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears.  The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares to the redemption date, on or after March 7, 2017.

Common Stock . The following is a summary of our common stock issuances during the periods indicated (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

Shares Issued

Average Price

Gross Proceeds

Net Proceeds

September 2010 public issuance

9,200,000

$

45.75

$

420,900

$

403,921

December 2010 public issuance

11,500,000

43.75

503,125

482,448

2010 Dividend reinvestment plan issuances

1,957,364

43.95

86,034

86,034

2010 Equity shelf program issuances

431,082

44.94

19,371

19,013

2010 Option exercises

129,054

31.17

4,022

4,022

2010 Totals

23,217,500

$

1,033,452

$

995,438

March 2011 public issuance

28,750,000

$

49.25

$

1,415,938

$

1,358,543

November 2011 public issuance

12,650,000

50.00

632,500

606,595

2011 Dividend reinvestment plan issuances

2,534,707

48.44

122,794

121,846

2011 Equity shelf program issuances

848,620

50.53

42,888

41,982

2011 Option exercises

232,081

37.17

8,628

8,628

2011 Totals

45,015,408

$

2,222,748

$

2,137,594

February 2012 public issuance

20,700,000

$

53.50

$

1,107,450

$

1,062,256

August 2012 public issuance

13,800,000

58.75

810,750

778,011

September 2012 public issuance

29,900,000

56.00

1,674,400

1,606,665

2012 Dividend reinvestment plan issuances

2,136,140

56.37

120,411

120,411

2012 Option exercises

341,371

40.86

13,949

13,949

2012 Senior note conversions

1,039,721

-

-

2012 Totals

67,917,232

$

3,726,960

$

3,581,292

92


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dividends .  The increase in dividends is primarily attributable to increases in our common and preferred shares outstanding as described above.  Please refer to Notes 2 and 18 for information related to federal income tax of dividends.  The following is a summary of our dividend payments (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Per Share

Amount

Per Share

Amount

Per Share

Amount

Common Stock

$

2.96000

$

653,321

$

2.83500

$

483,746

$

2.74000

$

348,578

Series D Preferred Stock

0.50301

2,012

1.96875

7,875

1.96875

7,875

Series E Preferred Stock

-

-

-

-

1.12500

94

Series F Preferred Stock

0.48715

3,410

1.90625

13,344

1.90625

13,344

Series G Preferred Stock

-

-

-

-

1.40640

332

Series H Preferred Stock

2.85840

1,000

2.85840

1,000

-

-

Series I Preferred Stock

3.25000

46,719

1.33159

38,283

-

-

Series J Preferred Stock

1.39038

15,988

-

-

-

-

Totals

$

722,450

$

544,248

$

370,223

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income . The following is a summary of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) as of the dates indicated (in thousands):

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Unrecognized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

$

(6,957)

$

(8,561)

Unrecognized gains (losses) on equity investments

(216)

(619)

Unrecognized gains (losses) on foreign currency translation

(881)

-

Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)

(2,974)

(2,748)

Totals

$

(11,028)

$

(11,928)

Other Equity .  Other equity consists of accumulated option compensation expense, which represents the amount of amortized compensation costs related to stock options awarded to employees and directors. Expense, which is recognized as the options vest based on the market value at the date of the award, totaled $2,875,000, $1,917,000 and $1,634,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

14. Stock Incentive Plans

Our Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan authorizes up to 6,200,000 shares of common stock to be issued at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The 2005 Plan replaced the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The options granted to officers and key employees under the 1995 Plan vested through 2010 and expire ten years from the date of grant. Our non-employee directors, officers and key employees are eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan allows for the issuance of, among other things, stock options, restricted stock, deferred stock units and dividend equivalent rights. Vesting periods for options, deferred stock units and restricted shares generally range from three years for non-employee directors to five years for officers and key employees. Options expire ten years from the date of grant.

Valuation Assumptions

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

93


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Dividend yield

5.16%

5.74%

6.28%

Expected volatility

35.15%

34.80%

34.08%

Risk-free interest rate

1.48%

2.87%

3.23%

Expected life (in years)

7.0

7.0

7.0

Weighted-average fair value

$11.11

$9.60

$7.82

The dividend yield represented the dividend yield of our common stock on the dates of grant. Our computation of expected volatility was based on historical volatility. The risk-free interest rates used were the 7-year U.S. Treasury Notes yield on the date of grant. The expected life was based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations regarding future employee behavior.

Option Award Activity

The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the periods presented:

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Number of

Weighted

Number of

Weighted

Number of

Weighted

Shares

Average

Shares

Average

Shares

Average

Stock Options

(000's)

Exercise Price

(000's)

Exercise Price

(000's)

Exercise Price

Options at beginning of year

1,252

$

42.12

1,207

$

39.45

1,062

$

37.71

Options granted

332

57.33

289

49.17

280

43.29

Options exercised

(341)

40.11

(232)

36.92

(129)

33.58

Options terminated

(81)

51.81

(12)

43.09

(6)

37.82

Options at end of period

1,162

$

46.40

1,252

$

42.12

1,207

$

39.45

Options exercisable at end of period

313

$

40.82

427

$

39.45

440

$

37.76

Weighted average fair value of

options granted during the period

$

11.11

$

9.60

$

7.82

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2012:

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Number

Weighted

Weighted Average

Number

Weighted

Weighted Average

Outstanding

Average

Remaining

Exercisable

Average

Remaining

Range of Per Share Exercise Prices

(thousands)

Exercise Price

Contract Life

(thousands)

Exercise Price

Contract Life

$30-$40

271

$

36.80

6.3

132

$

36.58

5.5

$40-$50

593

45.31

7.7

181

43.90

6.3

$50+

298

57.33

10.0

-

-

-

Totals

1,162

$

$46.40

6.9

313

$

40.82

6.0

Aggregate intrinsic value

$

17,095,000

$

6,341,000

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the quoted price of our common stock for the options that were in-the-money at December 31, 2012.  During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under our stock incentive plans was $6,186,000, $3,390,000 and $1,798,000, respectively (determined as of the date of option exercise).  Cash received from option exercises under our stock incentive plans was $13,949,000, $8,628,000 and $4,022,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

As of December 31, 2012, there was approximately $5,104,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under our stock incentive plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4 years.  As of

94


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2012, there was approximately $24,796,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock granted under our stock incentive plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3 years.

The following table summarizes information about non-vested stock incentive awards as of December 31, 2012 and changes for the year ended December 31, 2012:

Stock Options

Restricted Stock

Number of

Weighted-Average

Number of

Weighted-Average

Shares

Grant Date

Shares

Grant Date

(000's)

Fair Value

(000's)

Fair Value

Non-vested at December 31, 2011

825

$

7.40

508

$

44.91

Vested

(211)

6.96

(228)

47.38

Granted

332

11.11

404

57.31

Terminated

(97)

7.29

(83)

42.75

Non-vested at December 31, 2012

849

$

8.97

601

$

52.60

We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to estimate the value of stock option grants and expect to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model. We recognize compensation cost for share-based grants on a straight-line basis through the date the awards become fully vested or to the retirement eligible date, if sooner. Compensation cost totaled $18,521,000, $10,786,000 and $11,823,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

15. Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Numerator for basic and diluted earnings

per share - net income attributable to

common stockholders

$

221,884

$

157,108

$

106,882

Denominator for basic earnings per

share: weighted-average shares

224,343

173,741

127,656

Effect of dilutive securities:

Employee stock options

231

176

125

Non-vested restricted shares

312

246

420

Convertible senior unsecured notes

1,067

238

7

Dilutive potential common shares

1,610

660

552

Denominator for diluted earnings per

share: adjusted-weighted average shares

225,953

174,401

128,208

Basic earnings per share

$

0.99

$

0.90

$

0.84

Diluted earnings per share

$

0.98

$

0.90

$

0.83

The diluted earnings per share calculations exclude the dilutive effect of 182,000, 0 and 280,000 stock options for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because the exercise prices were more than the average market price. The Series H Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock issued in 2010 was excluded from the calculations for 2010 and 2011 as the effect of the conversions was anti-dilutive.  The Series I Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock issued in 2011 was excluded from the calculations for 2011 and 2012 as the effect of the conversions was anti-dilutive.

95


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

16. Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.

Mortgage Loans and Other Real Estate Loans Receivable — The fair value of mortgage loans and other real estate loans receivable is generally estimated by using level two and level three inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Available-for-sale Equity Investments — Available-for-sale equity investments are recorded at their fair value based on level one publicly available trading prices.

Borrowings Under Unsecured Line of Credit Arrangements — The carrying amount of the unsecured line of credit arrangements approximates fair value because the borrowings are interest rate adjustable.

Senior Unsecured Notes — The fair value of the senior unsecured notes payable was estimated based on level one publicly available trading prices.

Secured Debt — The fair value of fixed rate secured debt is estimated using level two inputs by discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.  The carrying amount of variable rate secured debt approximates fair value because the borrowings are interest rate adjustable.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements — Interest rate swap agreements are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair market value.  Fair market value is estimated using level two inputs by utilizing pricing models that consider forward yield curves and discount rates.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts — Foreign currency forward contracts are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair market value.  Fair market value is determined using level two inputs by estimating the future value of the currency pair based on existing exchange rates, comprised of current spot and traded forward points, and calculating a present value of the net amount using a discount factor based on observable traded interest rates.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Carrying

Fair

Carrying

Fair

Amount

Value

Amount

Value

Financial Assets:

Mortgage loans receivable

$

87,955

$

88,975

$

63,934

$

64,194

Other real estate loans receivable

807,710

820,195

228,573

231,308

Available-for-sale equity investments

1,384

1,384

980

980

Cash and cash equivalents

1,033,764

1,033,764

163,482

163,482

Financial Liabilities:

Borrowings under unsecured lines of credit arrangements

$

-

$

-

$

610,000

$

610,000

Senior unsecured notes

6,114,151

6,793,424

4,434,107

4,709,736

Secured debt

2,336,196

2,515,145

2,112,649

2,297,278

Interest rate swap agreements

264

264

2,854

2,854

Foreign currency forward contracts

7,247

7,247

-

-

U.S. GAAP provides authoritative guidance for measuring and disclosing fair value measurements of assets and liabilities.  The guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize

96


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.  Please see Note 2 for additional information.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The market approach is utilized to measure fair value for our financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis.  The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2012

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Available-for-sale equity investments (1)

$

1,384

$

1,384

$

-

$

-

Interest rate swap agreements (2)

(264)

-

(264)

-

Foreign currency forward contract (2)

(7,247)

-

(7,247)

-

Totals

$

(6,127)

$

1,384

$

(7,511)

$

-

(1) Unrealized gains or losses on equity investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at each measurement date.

(2) Please see Note 11 for additional information.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

In addition to items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we also have assets and liabilities in our balance sheet that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  As these assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, they are not included in the tables above. Assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include those acquired/assumed in business combinations (see Note 3) and asset impairments (see Note 5 for impairments of real property and Note 6 for impairments of loans receivable). We have determined that the fair value measurements included in each of these assets and liabilities rely primarily on Company-specific inputs and our assumptions about the use of the assets and settlement of liabilities, as observable inputs are not available. As such, we have determined that each of these fair value measurements generally reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. We estimate the fair value of real estate and related intangibles using the income approach and unobservable data such as net operating income and estimated capitalization and discount rates.  We also consider local and national industry market data including comparable sales, and commonly engage an external real estate appraiser to assist us in our estimation of fair value.  We estimate the fair value of assets held for sale based on current sales price expectations or, in the absence of such price expectations, Level 3 inputs described above.  We estimate the fair value of secured debt assumed in business combinations using current interest rates at which similar borrowings could be obtained on the transaction date.

97


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

17. Segment Reporting

We invest in seniors housing and health care real estate. We evaluate our business and make resource allocations on our five operating segments: seniors housing triple-net, seniors housing operating, medical office buildings, hospitals and life science. Our seniors housing triple-net properties include skilled nursing/post-acute facilities, assisted living facilities, independent living/continuing care retirement communities and combinations thereof. Under the seniors housing triple-net segment, we invest in seniors housing and health care real estate through acquisition and financing of primarily single tenant properties. Properties acquired are primarily leased under triple-net leases and we are not involved in the management of the property. Our seniors housing operating properties include seniors housing communities that are owned and/or operated through RIDEA structures (see Note 3).

Our medical facility properties include medical office buildings, hospitals and life science buildings which are aggregated into our medical facilities reportable segment. Our medical office buildings are typically leased to multiple tenants and generally require a certain level of property management. Our hospital investments are leased and we are not involved in the management of the property. Our life science investment represents an investment in an unconsolidated entity (see Note 7).

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2). The results of operations for all acquisitions described in Note 3 are included in our consolidated results of operations from the acquisition dates and are components of the appropriate segments.  There are no intersegment sales or transfers.

We evaluate performance based upon net operating income from continuing operations (“NOI”) of each segment. We define NOI as total revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level operating expenses, which exclude depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, transaction costs, provision for loan losses and interest expense. We believe NOI provides investors relevant and useful information because it measures the operating performance of our properties at the property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of our properties.

Non-segment revenue consists mainly of interest income on non-real estate investments and other income. Non-segment assets consist of corporate assets including cash, deferred loan expenses and corporate offices and equipment among others. Non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining NOI.

Summary information for the reportable segments (which excludes unconsolidated entities) during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 2012:

Seniors Housing Triple-net

Seniors Housing Operating

Medical Facilities

Non-segment / Corporate

Total

Rental income

$

692,807

$

-

$

387,462

$

-

$

1,080,269

Resident fees and services

-

697,494

-

-

697,494

Interest income

24,380

6,208

8,477

-

39,065

Other income

2,412

-

1,947

912

5,271

Total revenues

719,599

703,702

397,886

912

1,822,099

Property operating expenses

-

(471,678)

(98,439)

-

(570,117)

Net operating income from continuing operations

719,599

232,024

299,447

912

1,251,982

Reconciling items:

Interest expense

(4,601)

(67,524)

(31,540)

(263,418)

(367,083)

(Loss) gain on derivatives, net

(96)

1,921

-

-

1,825

Depreciation and amortization

(203,987)

(165,798)

(146,103)

-

(515,888)

General and administrative

-

-

-

(97,341)

(97,341)

Transaction costs

(35,705)

(12,756)

(13,148)

-

(61,609)

(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt, net

(2,405)

2,697

483

-

775

Provision for loan losses

(27,008)

-

-

-

(27,008)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and income from unconsolidated entities

$

445,797

$

(9,436)

$

109,139

$

(359,847)

$

185,653

Total assets

$

8,447,698

$

5,323,777

$

4,706,159

$

1,071,475

$

19,549,109

98


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Year Ended December 31, 2011:

Seniors Housing Triple-net

Seniors Housing Operating

Medical Facilities

Non-segment / Corporate

Total

Rental income

$

546,951

$

-

$

274,659

$

-

$

821,610

Resident fees and services

-

456,085

-

-

456,085

Interest income

34,068

-

7,002

-

41,070

Other income

6,620

-

3,985

690

11,295

Total revenues

587,639

456,085

285,646

690

1,330,060

Property operating expenses

-

(314,142)

(63,597)

-

(377,739)

Net operating income from continuing operations

587,639

141,943

222,049

690

952,321

Reconciling items:

Interest expense

(238)

(46,342)

(21,909)

(228,884)

(297,373)

Depreciation and amortization

(158,882)

(138,192)

(96,808)

-

(393,882)

General and administrative

-

-

-

(77,201)

(77,201)

Transaction costs

(27,993)

(36,328)

(5,903)

-

(70,224)

(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt, net

-

979

-

-

979

Provision for loan losses

-

-

(2,010)

-

(2,010)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and income from unconsolidated entities

$

400,526

$

(77,940)

$

95,419

$

(305,395)

$

112,610

Total assets

$

7,823,953

$

3,041,238

$

3,795,940

$

263,475

$

14,924,606

Year Ended December 31, 2010:

Seniors Housing Triple-net

Seniors Housing Operating

Medical Facilities

Non-segment / Corporate

Total

Rental income

$

283,505

$

-

$

195,960

$

-

$

479,465

Resident fees and services

-

51,006

-

-

51,006

Interest income

36,176

-

4,679

-

40,855

Other income

3,386

-

985

2,874

7,245

Total revenues

323,067

51,006

201,624

2,874

578,571

Property operating expenses

-

(32,621)

(45,166)

-

(77,787)

Net operating income from continuing operations

323,067

18,385

156,458

2,874

500,784

Reconciling items:

Interest expense

4,524

(7,794)

(17,579)

(113,129)

(133,978)

Depreciation and amortization

(81,718)

(15,504)

(67,943)

-

(165,165)

General and administrative

-

-

-

(54,626)

(54,626)

Transaction costs

(20,612)

(20,936)

(5,112)

-

(46,660)

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net

(7,791)

-

(1,308)

(25,072)

(34,171)

Provision for loan losses

(29,684)

-

-

-

(29,684)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and income from unconsolidated entities

$

187,786

$

(25,849)

$

64,516

$

(189,953)

$

36,500

Our portfolio of properties and other investments are located in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. Revenues and assets are attributed to the country in which the property is physically located. For the year ended December 31, 2012, $25,321,000 (or 1.4% of our revenues) and $856,895,000 (or 4.4% of our assets) were located outside the United States. There were no revenues or assets located outside the United States for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

99


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

18. Income Taxes and Distributions

We elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our first taxable year.  To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, at least 90% of taxable income (excluding 100% of net capital gains) must be distributed to stockholders.  REITs that do not distribute a certain amount of current year taxable income in the current year are also subject to a 4% federal excise tax. The main differences between undistributed net income for federal income tax purposes and financial statement purposes are the recognition of straight-line rent for reporting purposes, basis differences in acquisitions, recording of impairments, differing useful lives and depreciation and amortization methods for real property and the provision for loan losses for reporting purposes versus bad debt expense for tax purposes.

Cash distributions paid to common stockholders, for federal income tax purposes, are as follows for the periods presented:

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Per Share:

Ordinary income

$

1.5000

$

1.1472

$

0.7774

Return of capital

1.3376

1.4227

1.7408

Long-term capital gains

0.1176

0.1059

0.0190

Unrecaptured section 1250 gains

0.0048

0.1592

0.2028

Totals

$

2.9600

$

2.8350

$

2.7400

Our consolidated provision for income taxes is as follows for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Current

$

4,785

$

389

$

319

Deferred

2,827

999

45

Totals

$

7,612

$

1,388

$

364

REITs generally are not subject to U.S. federal income taxes on that portion of REIT taxable income or capital gain that is distributed to stockholders.  For the tax year ended December 31, 2012, as a result of acquisitions located in Canada and the United Kingdom, we were subject to foreign income taxes under the respective tax laws of these jurisdictions.  The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily relates to state taxes, foreign taxes, requirements of ASC 740-10, and taxes on TRS income.

For the tax year ended December 31, 2012, the Canadian and United Kingdom tax expense amount included in the consolidated provision for income taxes was $596,000.  We did not hold an interest in any entity located in a foreign jurisdiction for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

A reconciliation of income tax expense, which is computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, to the income tax provision/(benefit) is as follows for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

100


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Tax at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before unconsolidated entities, noncontrolling interests and income taxes

$

64,979

$

54,750

$

26,111

Increase in valuation allowance

9,234

(4,732)

317

Tax at statutory rate on earnings not subject to federal income taxes

(72,640)

(48,630)

(26,064)

Other differences

6,039

-

-

Totals

$

7,612

$

1,388

$

364

Each TRS and foreign entity subject to income taxes is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. The tax effects of taxable and deductible temporary differences, as well as tax attributes, are summarized as follows for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and the treatment of interests and certain costs

$

(2,144)

$

(1,577)

$

(29)

Operating loss and interest deduction carryforwards

8,552

1,488

7,080

Expense accruals and other

4,372

5,749

1,980

Valuation allowance

(12,199)

(2,965)

(7,697)

Totals

$

(1,419)

$

2,695

$

1,334

At December 31, 2012, we recorded a valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets of our U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries and Canadian entities. These tax attributes are carried forward in order to offset taxable income in future years.  The valuation allowances have been established for these assets based upon our assessment of whether it is more likely than not that such assets may not be realized. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the valuation allowance increased primarily due to additional deferred tax assets recorded for Canadian net operating losses.  At December 31, 2012, we had a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward related to Canadian entities of $32,061,000.  These Canadian losses have a 20-year carryforward period.  The valuation allowance rollforward is summarized as follows for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Beginning balance

$

2,965

$

7,697

$

7,380

Additions

9,234

-

317

Deductions

-

(4,732)

-

Ending balance

$

12,199

$

2,965

$

7,697

As a result of certain acquisitions, we are subject to corporate level taxes for any related asset dispositions that may occur during the ten-year period immediately after such assets were owned by a C corporation (“built-in gains tax”). The amount of income potentially subject to this special corporate level tax is generally equal to the lesser of (a) the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a REIT asset, or (b) the actual amount of gain. Some but not all gains recognized during this period of time could be offset by available net operating losses and capital loss carryforwards.  As of December 31, 2012, we have acquired an additional 40 assets with built-in gains as of the date of acquisition that could be subject to the built-in gains tax if disposed of prior to the expiration of the applicable ten-year period.  We have not recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of the potential built-in gains tax based on our intentions with respect to such properties and available tax planning strategies.

Under the provisions of the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”), for taxable years beginning after July 30, 2008, the REIT may lease “qualified health care properties” on an arm’s-length basis to a TRS if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an “eligible independent contractor.” Generally, the rent received from the TRS will meet the related party rent exception and will be treated as “rents from real property.” A “qualified health care property” includes real property and any personal property that is, or is necessary or incidental to the use of, a hospital, nursing facility, assisted living facility, congregate care facility, qualified continuing care facility, or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients.  We have entered into various joint ventures that were structured under RIDEA.

101


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Resident level rents and related operating expenses for these facilities are reported in the consolidated financial statements and are subject to federal taxes as the operations of such facilities are included in a TRS.  Certain net operating loss carryforwards could be utilized to offset taxable income in future years.

Generally, we are subject to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the year ended December 31, 2008 and subsequent years and are subject to audit by state taxing authorities for the year ended December 31, 2007 and subsequent years. In the future, we will be subject to audit by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) and provincial authorities generally for periods subsequent to our REIT acquisition in May 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with the acquisition, and by HM Revenue & Customs for periods subsequent to our REIT acquisition in August 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with the acquisition.

At December 31, 2012, we had a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward related to the REIT of $96,253,000.  Due to our uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets, we have not recorded a deferred tax asset related to NOLs generated by the REIT.  These amounts can be used to offset future taxable income (and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed), if any. The REIT will be entitled to utilize NOLs and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that REIT taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid.  The NOL carryforwards will expire through 2032.

We apply the rules under ASC 740-10 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” for uncertain tax positions using a “more likely than not” recognition threshold for tax positions. Pursuant to these rules, we will initially recognize the financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits of the tax position, that such a position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authorities. If the tax benefit meets the “more likely than not” threshold, the measurement of the tax benefit will be based on our estimate of the ultimate tax benefit to be sustained if audited by the taxing authority.  The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year

$

6,098

$

-

Increases (decreases) in unrecognized tax benefits related to a prior year

(248)

-

Increases (decreases) in unrecognized tax benefits related to the current year

394

6,098

Lapse in statute of limitations for assessment

(146)

-

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of year

$

6,098

$

6,098

Of the total $6,098,000 of total liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2012, $5,916,000 (exclusive of accrued interest and penalties) relates to the April 1, 2011 Genesis HealthCare Corporation transaction (“Genesis Acquisition”) and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.  As a part of the Genesis Acquisition, we received a full indemnification from FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC covering income taxes or other taxes as well as  interest and penalties relating to tax positions taken by FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC prior to the acquisition.  Accordingly, an offsetting indemnification asset is recorded in receivables and other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.  Such indemnification asset is reviewed for collectability periodically.

There is no amount of unrecognized tax benefits, currently accrued for, that would have a material impact on the effective tax rate to the extent that would be recognized.  There were insignificant uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2012 for which it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits would decrease during 2013.  Interest and penalties totaled $299,000 and $815,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012 and are included in income tax expense.  Of these amounts, $221,000 and $638,000 of interest and penalties, respectively, relate to the Genesis Acquisition and are offset by the indemnification asset.

19. Retirement Arrangements

Under the retirement plan and trust (the “401(k) Plan”), eligible employees may make contributions, and we may make matching contributions and a profit sharing contribution. Our contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaled $2,140,000, $1,558,000 and $1,341,000 in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

We have a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan, which provides one executive officer with supplemental deferred retirement benefits. The SERP provides an opportunity for the participant to receive

102


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

retirement benefits that cannot be paid under our tax-qualified plans because of the restrictions imposed by ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Benefits are based on compensation and length of service and the SERP is unfunded. Benefit payments are expected to total $4,043,000 during the next five fiscal years and $2,479,000 thereafter. We use a December 31 measurement date for the SERP. The accrued liability on our balance sheet for the SERP was $6,665,000 at December 31, 2012 ($5,623,000 at December 31, 2011).

20. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of our unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except per share data). The sum of individual quarterly amounts may not agree to the annual amounts included in the consolidated statements of income due to rounding.

Year Ended December 31, 2012

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter (2)

4th Quarter

Revenues - as reported

$

435,359

$

453,082

$

474,139

$

500,663

Discontinued operations

(17,230)

(13,194)

(10,720)

-

Revenues - as adjusted (1)

$

418,129

$

439,888

$

463,419

$

500,663

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

$

39,307

$

54,735

$

37,269

$

90,576

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share:

Basic

$

0.20

$

0.26

$

0.17

$

0.35

Diluted

0.19

0.25

0.16

0.35

Year Ended December 31, 2011

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter (3)

4th Quarter (4)

Revenues - as reported

$

255,477

$

381,059

$

384,786

$

407,391

Discontinued operations

(26,859)

(24,361)

(24,607)

(22,826)

Revenues - as adjusted (1)

$

228,618

$

356,698

$

360,179

$

384,565

Net income attributable to common stockholders

$

23,372

$

69,847

$

36,607

$

27,282

Net income attributable to common stockholders per share:

Basic

$

0.15

$

0.40

$

0.21

$

0.15

Diluted

0.15

0.39

0.21

0.15

(1) We have reclassified the income attributable to the properties sold prior to or held for sale at December 31, 2012 to discontinued operations. See Note 5.

(2) The decreases in net income and amounts per share are primarily attributable to gains on sales of real estate totaling $32,450,000 for the second quarter as compared to $12,827,000 for the third quarter.

(3) The decreases in net income and amounts per share are primarily attributable to gains on sales of real estate totaling $30,224,000 for the second quarter as compared to $185,000 for the third quarter.

(4) The decreases in net income and amounts per share are primarily attributable to impairment charges of $11,992,000.

103


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21. Subsequent Events

Line of Credit Modification

On January 8, 2013, we closed a $2,750,000,000 unsecured line of credit arrangement consisting of a $2,250,000,000 revolver and a $500,000,000 term loan.  The facility replaced our existing $2,000,000,000 unsecured line of credit arrangement described in Note 9. The revolver matures on March 31, 2017, but can be extended for an additional year at our option.  The term loan matures on March 31, 2016, but can be extended up to two years at our option.  The revolver bears interest at LIBOR plus 117.5 basis points and has an annual facility fee of 22.5 basis points.  The term loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 135 basis points. We have an option to upsize the facility by up to an additional $1,000,000,000 through an accordion feature, allowing for aggregate commitments of up to $3,750,000,000.  The facility also allows us to borrow up to $500,000,000 in alternate currencies.

Sunrise Merger

In August 2012, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (“Sunrise”), pursuant to which we agreed to acquire Sunrise in an all-cash merger (the “Merger”) in which Sunrise stockholders would receive $14.50 in cash for each share of Sunrise common stock. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we completed our acquisition of the Sunrise property portfolio.  The total estimated purchase price of approximately $3,281,300,000 (which includes certain seniors housing operating investments that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012 and are included in Notes 3 and 6) is comprised of approximately $3,084,400,000 cash consideration and $133,900,000 of assumed debt (excluding our pro rata share of debt at unconsolidated entities) and excludes fair value and other purchase price accounting adjustments.  As of December 31, 2012, we were committed to fund an additional $2,021,400,000 in cash which was sourced from cash on-hand and our new unsecured line of credit arrangement described above.

In connection with the Merger Agreement, Sunrise agreed to sell its management business and certain additional assets and liabilities to Red Fox Management, LP (the “Management Business Buyer”). Immediately prior to our acquisition of the Sunrise property portfolio on January 9, 2013, the Management Business Buyer acquired the Sunrise management company for $130,000,000, with the Company investing $26,000,000 for a 20% ownership interest. The Management Business Buyer will provide management services to the communities under an incentive-based management contract.

Initial accounting for the entire acquisition is incomplete as of February 26, 2013 due to the complexity of the transaction.  No measurement period adjustments were recognized for the year ending December 31, 2012 as the transaction closed after year-end.  Pro forma financial information has not been provided herein due to a lack of sufficient information at the time of the filing.

104


HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in a report entitled Internal Control — Integrated Framework.  Based on this assessment, using the criteria above, management concluded that the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.

The independent registered public accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP, as auditors of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) occurred during the fourth quarter of the one-year period covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

105


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Health Care REIT, Inc.

We have audited Health Care REIT, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Health Care REIT, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Health Care REIT, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Health Care REIT, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 and our report dated February 26, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Toledo, Ohio

February 26, 2013

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

106


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Board and Committees,” “Communications with the Board” and “Security Ownership of Directors and Management and Certain Beneficial Owners — Section 16(a) Compliance” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) prior to April 30, 2013.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct & Ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The code is posted on the Internet at www.hcreit.com. Any amendment to, or waivers from, the code that relate to any officer or director of the Company will be promptly disclosed on the Internet at www.hcreit.com.

In addition, the Board has adopted charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees. These charters are posted on the Internet at www.hcreit.com.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Director Compensation” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2013.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Security Ownership of Directors and Management and Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2013.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Board and Committees — Independence and Meetings” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2013.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2013.

107


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) 1. Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Part II, Item 8:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

71

Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2012 and 2011

72

Consolidated Statements of  Comprehensive Income — Years ended  December 31, 2012, 2011 and  2010

73

Consolidated Statements of  Equity — Years ended  December 31, 2012, 2011 and  2010

75

Consolidated Statements of  Cash Flows — Years ended  December 31, 2012, 2011 and  2010

76

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

77

2. The following Financial Statement Schedules are included in

Item 15(c):

III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

3. Exhibit Index:

The information required by this item is set forth on the Exhibit Index that follows the Financial Statement Schedules to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(b) Exhibits:

The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are either filed with this Form 10-K or incorporated by reference in accordance with Rule 12b-32 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(c) Financial Statement Schedules:

Financial statement schedules are included beginning on page 110.

108


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

By: /s/ George L. Chapman

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 26, 2013, by the following person on behalf of the Company and in the capacities indicated.

/s/ William C. Ballard, Jr.**

/s/ Jeffrey R. Otten**

William C. Ballard, Jr., Director

Jeffrey R. Otten, Director

/s/ Thomas J. Derosa**

/s/ Judith C. Pelham**

Thomas J. DeRosa, Director

Judith C. Pelham, Director

/s/ Jeffrey H. Donahue**

/s/ R. Scott Trumbull**

Jeffrey H. Donahue, Director

R. Scott Trumbull, Director

/s/ Peter J. Grua**

/s/ George L. Chapman

Peter J. Grua, Director

George L. Chapman, Chairman, Chief Executive

Officer, President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Fred S. Klipsch**

/s/ Scott A. Estes**

Fred S. Klipsch, Director

Scott A. Estes, Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Sharon M. Oster**

/s/ Paul D. Nungester, Jr.**

Sharon M. Oster, Director

Paul D. Nungester, Jr., Senior Vice President and

Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

**By:          /s/ George L. Chapman

George L. Chapman, Attorney-in-Fact

109


Health Care REIT, Inc.

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

Initial Cost to Company

Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period

Description

Encumbrances

Land

Building & Improvements

Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition

Land

Building & Improvements

Accumulated Depreciation (1)

Year Acquired

Year Built

Seniors housing triple-net:

Aboite Twp, IN

$

-

$

1,770

$

19,930

$

1,601

$

1,770

$

21,531

$

1,222

2010

2008

Agawam, MA

-

880

16,112

2,134

880

18,246

5,213

2002

1993

Agawam, MA

-

1,230

13,618

289

1,230

13,906

709

2011

1975

Agawam, MA

-

930

15,304

229

930

15,533

762

2011

1970

Agawam, MA

-

920

10,661

36

920

10,697

556

2011

1985

Agawam, MA

-

920

10,562

45

920

10,607

551

2011

1967

Akron, OH

-

290

8,219

491

290

8,710

1,821

2005

1961

Akron, OH

-

630

7,535

229

630

7,764

1,414

2006

1915

Alliance, OH

-

270

7,723

107

270

7,830

1,539

2006

1982

Amelia Island, FL

-

3,290

24,310

20,122

3,288

44,434

6,432

2005

1998

Ames, IA

-

330

8,870

-

330

8,870

639

2010

1999

Anderson, SC

-

710

6,290

419

710

6,709

1,955

2003

1986

Andover, MA

-

1,310

12,647

27

1,310

12,674

679

2011

1985

Annapolis, MD

-

1,010

24,825

50

1,010

24,876

1,185

2011

1993

Ansted, WV

-

240

14,113

43

240

14,156

662

2011

1982

Asheboro, NC

-

290

5,032

165

290

5,197

1,340

2003

1998

Asheville, NC

-

204

3,489

-

204

3,489

1,375

1999

1999

Asheville, NC

-

280

1,955

351

280

2,306

669

2003

1992

Aspen Hill, MD

-

-

9,008

457

-

9,465

482

2011

1988

Aurora, OH

-

1,760

14,148

41

1,760

14,189

811

2011

2002

Aurora, CO

-

2,600

5,906

7,915

2,600

13,821

2,915

2006

1988

Aurora, CO

-

2,440

28,172

-

2,440

28,172

4,425

2006

2007

Austin, TX

9,934

730

18,970

-

730

18,970

2,931

2007

2006

Aventura, FL

-

4,540

33,986

-

4,540

33,986

305

2012

2001

Avon, IN

-

1,830

14,470

-

1,830

14,470

1,089

2010

2004

Avon Lake, OH

-

790

10,421

32

790

10,452

622

2011

2001

Ayer, MA

-

-

22,074

3

-

22,077

1,056

2011

1988

Baltic, OH

-

50

8,709

189

50

8,898

1,716

2006

1983

Baltimore, MD

-

1,350

14,884

321

1,350

15,204

754

2011

1905

Baltimore, MD

-

900

5,039

90

900

5,129

302

2011

1969

Bartlesville, OK

-

100

1,380

-

100

1,380

634

1996

1995

Baytown, TX

9,317

450

6,150

-

450

6,150

1,883

2002

2000

Baytown, TX

-

540

11,110

-

540

11,110

1,009

2009

2008

Beachwood, OH

-

1,260

23,478

-

1,260

23,478

7,182

2001

1990

Beattyville, KY

-

100

6,900

660

100

7,560

1,489

2005

1972

Bedford, NH

-

2,250

28,831

5

2,250

28,836

1,371

2011

1978

Bellevue, WI

-

1,740

18,260

571

1,740

18,831

3,207

2006

2004

Benbrook, TX

-

1,550

13,553

-

1,550

13,553

589

2011

1984

Bethel Park, PA

-

1,700

16,007

-

1,700

16,007

1,650

2007

2009

Bluefield, VA

-

900

12,463

32

900

12,495

611

2011

1990

Boca Raton, FL

-

1,440

31,048

-

1,440

31,048

275

2012

1989

Boonville, IN

-

190

5,510

-

190

5,510

1,654

2002

2000

Bradenton, FL

-

252

3,298

-

252

3,298

1,531

1996

1995

Bradenton, FL

3,031

480

9,953

-

480

9,953

132

2012

2000

Braintree, MA

-

170

7,157

1,290

170

8,447

7,669

1997

1968

Brandon, MS

-

1,220

10,241

-

1,220

10,241

608

2010

1999

Bremerton, WA

-

390

2,210

144

390

2,354

364

2006

1999

Bremerton, WA

-

830

10,420

150

830

10,570

649

2010

1984

Brick, NJ

-

1,290

25,247

102

1,290

25,349

904

2011

2000

Brick, NJ

-

1,170

17,372

223

1,179

17,586

910

2010

1998

Brick, NJ

-

690

17,125

51

690

17,176

880

2010

1999

Bridgewater, NJ

-

1,850

3,050

-

1,850

3,050

997

2004

1970

Bridgewater, NJ

-

1,730

48,201

260

1,739

48,452

2,479

2010

1999

Bridgewater, NJ

-

1,800

31,810

40

1,800

31,850

1,124

2011

2001

Broadview Heights, OH

-

920

12,400

2,393

920

14,793

3,945

2001

1984

Brookline, MA

-

2,760

9,217

2,540

2,760

11,757

554

2011

1984

Brooklyn Park, MD

-

1,290

16,329

29

1,290

16,358

808

2011

1973

Burleson, TX

-

670

13,985

-

670

13,985

630

2011

1988

Burlington, NC

-

280

4,297

707

280

5,004

1,270

2003

2000

Burlington, NC

-

460

5,467

-

460

5,467

1,428

2003

1997

Burlington, NJ

-

1,700

12,554

382

1,700

12,936

716

2011

1965

Burlington, NJ

-

1,170

19,205

167

1,170

19,372

820

2011

1994

Byrdstown, TN

-

-

2,414

269

-

2,683

1,414

2004

1982

Cambridge, MD

-

490

15,843

207

490

16,050

767

2011

1990

Canton, MA

-

820

8,201

263

820

8,464

3,125

2002

1993

Canton, OH

-

300

2,098

-

300

2,098

819

1998

1998

Cape Coral, FL

-

530

3,281

-

530

3,281

989

2002

2000

Cape Coral, FL

9,387

760

18,868

-

760

18,868

254

2012

2009

Carmel, IN

-

2,370

57,175

421

2,370

57,596

6,749

2006

2007

Cary, NC

-

1,500

4,350

986

1,500

5,336

1,926

1998

1996

Catonsville, MD

-

1,330

15,003

549

1,330

15,552

759

2011

1973

Cedar Grove, NJ

-

1,830

10,939

10

1,830

10,949

567

2011

1964

Cedar Grove, NJ

-

2,850

27,737

21

2,850

27,757

1,352

2011

1970

Centreville, MD (2)

-

600

14,602

-

600

14,602

726

2011

1978

Chapel Hill, NC

-

354

2,646

783

354

3,429

993

2002

1997

Charles Town, WV

-

230

22,834

29

230

22,863

1,057

2011

1997

Charleston, WV

-

440

17,575

47

440

17,622

823

2011

1998

Charleston, WV

-

410

5,430

13

410

5,444

287

2011

1979

Chelmsford, MA

-

1,040

10,951

1,499

1,040

12,450

2,734

2003

1997

Chicago, IL

-

1,800

19,256

-

1,800

19,256

313

2012

2005

Chicago, IL

-

2,900

17,016

-

2,900

17,016

280

2012

2007

Chickasha, OK

-

85

1,395

-

85

1,395

635

1996

1996

Cinnaminson, NJ

-

860

6,663

149

860

6,812

375

2011

1965

Claremore, OK

-

155

1,427

1

155

1,428

630

1996

1996

Clark Summit, PA

-

600

11,179

15

600

11,194

576

2011

1985

Clark Summit, PA

-

400

6,529

54

400

6,583

344

2011

1997

Clarksville, TN

-

330

2,292

-

330

2,292

887

1998

1998

Cleburne, TX

-

520

5,369

-

520

5,369

799

2006

2007

Cleveland, TN

-

350

5,000

122

350

5,122

1,684

2001

1987

Clinton, MD

-

2,330

20,876

-

2,330

20,876

345

2012

1988

Cloquet, MN

-

340

4,660

-

340

4,660

165

2011

2006

Colchester, CT

-

980

4,860

495

980

5,355

313

2011

1986

Colts Neck, NJ

-

780

14,733

347

920

14,940

795

2010

2002

Columbia, TN

-

341

2,295

-

341

2,295

899

1999

1999

Columbia, TN

-

590

3,787

-

590

3,787

1,303

2003

1974

Columbia, SC

-

2,120

4,860

5,709

2,120

10,569

2,527

2003

2000

Columbia Heights, MN

-

825

14,175

-

825

14,175

469

2011

2009

Columbus, IN

-

610

3,190

-

610

3,190

235

2010

1998

Columbus, IN

-

530

6,710

-

530

6,710

1,863

2002

2001

Columbus, OH

-

530

5,170

8,255

1,070

12,885

2,533

2005

1968

Columbus, OH

-

1,010

5,022

-

1,010

5,022

1,084

2006

1983

Columbus, OH

-

1,010

4,931

13,620

1,860

17,701

3,412

2006

1978

Concord, NC

-

550

3,921

55

550

3,976

1,151

2003

1997

Concord, NH

-

780

18,423

378

780

18,801

867

2011

1972

Concord, NH

-

1,760

43,179

545

1,760

43,724

2,021

2011

1994

Concord, NH

-

720

3,041

203

720

3,245

188

2011

1905

Conroe, TX

-

980

7,771

-

980

7,771

592

2009

2010

Conyers, GA

-

2,740

19,302

-

2,740

19,302

171

2012

1998

Corpus Christi, TX

-

400

1,916

-

400

1,916

604

2005

1985

Cortland, NY

-

700

18,041

-

700

18,041

117

2012

2001

Daniels, WV

-

200

17,320

49

200

17,370

808

2011

1986

Danville, VA

-

410

3,954

722

410

4,676

1,238

2003

1998

Daphne, AL

-

2,880

8,670

-

2,880

8,670

155

2012

2001

Dedham, MA

-

1,360

9,830

-

1,360

9,830

3,168

2002

1996

DeForest, WI

-

250

5,350

354

250

5,704

840

2007

2006

Defuniak Springs, FL

-

1,350

10,250

-

1,350

10,250

1,867

2006

1980

Denton, TX

-

1,760

8,305

-

1,760

8,305

272

2010

2011

Denver, CO

-

2,530

9,514

-

2,530

9,514

1,965

2005

1986

Denver, CO

-

3,650

14,906

1,605

3,650

16,511

2,565

2006

1987

Denver, CO

-

2,076

13,594

-

2,076

13,594

1,146

2007

2009

Dover, DE

-

400

7,717

38

400

7,755

396

2011

1997

Dover, DE

-

600

22,266

90

600

22,356

1,063

2011

1984

Drescher, PA

-

2,060

40,236

159

2,067

40,388

2,063

2010

2001

Dundalk, MD (2)

-

1,770

32,047

-

1,770

32,047

1,532

2011

1978

Durham, NC

-

1,476

10,659

2,196

1,476

12,855

8,207

1997

1999

East Brunswick, NJ

-

1,380

34,229

87

1,380

34,315

1,198

2011

1998

East Norriston, PA

-

1,200

28,129

285

1,210

28,404

1,474

2010

1988

Easton, MD

-

900

24,539

-

900

24,539

1,205

2011

1962

Easton, PA

-

285

6,315

-

285

6,315

3,579

1993

1959

Eatontown, NJ

-

1,190

23,358

67

1,190

23,426

1,138

2011

1996

Eden, NC

-

390

4,877

-

390

4,877

1,294

2003

1998

Edmond, OK

-

410

8,388

-

410

8,388

210

2012

2001

Elizabeth City, NC

-

200

2,760

2,011

200

4,771

1,592

1998

1999

Elizabethton, TN

-

310

4,604

336

310

4,940

1,658

2001

1980

Englewood, NJ

-

930

4,514

17

930

4,531

242

2011

1966

Englishtown, NJ

-

690

12,520

401

722

12,890

683

2010

1997

Erin, TN

-

440

8,060

134

440

8,194

2,581

2001

1981

Everett, WA

-

1,400

5,476

-

1,400

5,476

2,037

1999

1999

Fair Lawn, NJ

-

2,420

24,504

159

2,420

24,663

1,190

2011

1962

Fairfield, CA

-

1,460

14,040

1,548

1,460

15,588

4,337

2002

1998

Fairhope, AL

-

570

9,119

-

570

9,119

162

2012

1987

Fall River, MA

-

620

5,829

4,856

620

10,685

3,953

1996

1973

Fall River, MA

-

920

34,715

208

920

34,923

1,655

2011

1993

Fanwood, NJ

-

2,850

55,175

121

2,850

55,296

1,904

2011

1982

Fayetteville, GA

-

560

12,665

-

560

12,665

110

2012

1994

Fayetteville, NY

-

410

3,962

500

410

4,462

1,316

2001

1997

Findlay, OH

-

200

1,800

-

200

1,800

762

1997

1997

Fishers, IN

-

1,500

14,500

-

1,500

14,500

1,090

2010

2000

Florence, NJ

-

300

2,978

-

300

2,978

893

2002

1999

Flourtown, PA

-

1,800

14,830

108

1,800

14,938

737

2011

1908

Flower Mound, TX

-

1,800

8,414

-

1,800

8,414

-

2011

-

Follansbee, WV

-

640

27,670

44

640

27,714

1,305

2011

1982

Forest City, NC

-

320

4,497

-

320

4,497

1,205

2003

1999

Fort Ashby, WV

-

330

19,566

123

330

19,689

906

2011

1980

Franconia, NH

-

360

11,320

69

360

11,390

549

2011

1971

Franklin, NH

-

430

15,210

46

430

15,255

729

2011

1990

Fredericksburg, VA

-

1,000

20,000

1,200

1,000

21,200

4,133

2005

1999

Fredericksburg, VA

-

590

28,611

35

590

28,646

1,339

2011

1977

Fredericksburg, VA

-

3,700

22,016

-

3,700

22,016

143

2012

1992

Gardner, MA

-

480

10,210

27

480

10,237

517

2011

1902

Gastonia, NC

-

470

6,129

-

470

6,129

1,591

2003

1998

Gastonia, NC

-

310

3,096

22

310

3,118

866

2003

1994

Gastonia, NC

-

400

5,029

120

400

5,149

1,346

2003

1996

Georgetown, TX

-

200

2,100

-

200

2,100

876

1997

1997

Gettysburg, PA

-

590

8,913

26

590

8,938

475

2011

1987

Glastonbury, CT

-

1,950

9,532

595

2,360

9,717

513

2011

1966

Glen Mills, PA

-

690

9,110

165

690

9,275

467

2011

1993

Glenside, PA

-

1,940

16,867

24

1,940

16,891

832

2011

1905

Goshen, IN

-

210

6,120

-

210

6,120

1,255

2005

2006

Graceville, FL

-

150

13,000

-

150

13,000

2,302

2006

1980

Grafton, WV

-

280

18,824

37

280

18,861

875

2011

1986

Granbury, TX

-

2,040

30,670

-

2,040

30,670

1,365

2011

2009

Granbury, TX

-

2,550

2,940

-

2,550

2,940

26

2012

1996

Grand Blanc, MI

-

700

7,843

-

700

7,843

-

2011

-

Grand Ledge, MI

8,178

1,150

16,286

-

1,150

16,286

908

2010

1999

Granger, IN

-

1,670

21,280

1,751

1,670

23,031

1,313

2010

2009

Greendale, WI

-

2,060

35,383

-

2,060

35,383

707

2012

1988

Greeneville, TN

-

400

8,290

507

400

8,797

2,122

2004

1979

Greenfield, WI

-

600

6,626

328

600

6,954

994

2006

2006

Greensboro, NC

-

330

2,970

554

330

3,524

956

2003

1996

Greensboro, NC

-

560

5,507

1,013

560

6,520

1,755

2003

1997

Greenville, SC

-

310

4,750

-

310

4,750

1,153

2004

1997

Greenville, SC

-

5,400

100,523

1,997

5,400

102,520

8,077

2006

2009

Greenville, NC

-

290

4,393

168

290

4,561

1,177

2003

1998

Greenwood, IN

-

1,550

22,770

81

1,550

22,851

1,344

2010

2007

Groton, CT

-

2,430

19,941

739

2,430

20,680

1,053

2011

1975

Haddonfield, NJ

-

520

2,320

160

520

2,480

1,668

2011

1953

Hamburg, PA

-

840

10,543

142

840

10,685

584

2011

1966

Hamilton, NJ

-

440

4,469

-

440

4,469

1,330

2001

1998

Hanover, IN

-

210

4,430

-

210

4,430

1,108

2004

2000

Harleysville, PA

-

960

11,355

-

960

11,355

1,089

2008

2009

Harriman, TN

-

590

8,060

158

590

8,218

2,757

2001

1972

Hatboro, PA

-

-

28,112

890

-

29,002

1,329

2011

1996

Hattiesburg, MS

-

450

15,518

35

450

15,553

818

2010

2009

Haverford, PA

-

1,880

33,993

387

1,882

34,378

1,750

2010

2000

Hemet, CA

-

870

3,405

-

870

3,405

499

2007

1996

Hermitage, TN

-

1,500

9,856

8

1,500

9,863

409

2011

2006

Hickory, NC

-

290

987

232

290

1,219

443

2003

1994

High Point, NC

-

560

4,443

793

560

5,236

1,393

2003

2000

High Point, NC

-

370

2,185

410

370

2,595

739

2003

1999

High Point, NC

-

330

3,395

28

330

3,423

918

2003

1994

High Point, NC

-

430

4,143

-

430

4,143

1,101

2003

1998

Highland Park, IL

-

2,820

15,832

-

2,820

15,832

35

2011

2012

Highlands Ranch, CO

-

940

3,721

-

940

3,721

1,132

2002

1999

Hilltop, WV

-

480

25,355

15

480

25,370

1,198

2011

1977

Hollywood, FL

-

1,240

13,806

-

1,240

13,806

124

2012

2001

Homestead, FL

-

2,750

11,750

-

2,750

11,750

2,129

2006

1994

Houston, TX

9,931

860

18,715

-

860

18,715

2,642

2007

2006

Houston, TX

-

5,090

9,471

-

5,090

9,471

1,014

2007

2009

Houston, TX

10,288

630

5,970

750

630

6,720

1,989

2002

1995

Howell, NJ

10,299

1,050

21,703

150

1,064

21,839

1,140

2010

2007

Huntington, WV

-

800

32,261

126

800

32,387

1,530

2011

1976

Huron, OH

-

160

6,088

1,452

160

7,540

1,389

2005

1983

Hurricane, WV

-

620

21,454

805

620

22,258

1,041

2011

1986

Hutchinson, KS

-

600

10,590

194

600

10,784

2,317

2004

1997

Indianapolis, IN

-

495

6,287

22,565

495

28,852

5,663

2006

1981

Indianapolis, IN

-

255

2,473

12,123

255

14,596

2,697

2006

1981

Jackson, NJ

-

6,500

26,405

-

6,500

26,405

171

2012

2001

Jacksonville Beach, FL

-

1,210

26,207

-

1,210

26,207

226

2012

1999

Jamestown, TN

-

-

6,707

45

-

6,752

3,912

2004

1966

Jefferson, OH

-

80

9,120

-

80

9,120

1,858

2006

1984

Jupiter, FL

-

3,100

47,453

-

3,100

47,453

303

2012

2002

Kalida, OH

-

480

8,173

-

480

8,173

1,285

2006

2007

Keene, NH

-

530

9,639

284

530

9,923

385

2011

1980

Kenner, LA

-

1,100

10,036

328

1,100

10,364

6,550

1998

2000

Kennesaw, GA

-

940

10,848

-

940

10,848

99

2012

1998

Kennett Square, PA

-

1,050

22,946

49

1,060

22,985

1,186

2010

2008

Kenosha, WI

-

1,500

9,139

-

1,500

9,139

971

2007

2009

Kent, WA

-

940

20,318

10,470

940

30,788

3,651

2007

2000

Kirkland, WA

-

1,880

4,315

683

1,880

4,998

1,143

2003

1996

Laconia, NH

-

810

14,434

483

810

14,916

711

2011

1968

Lake Barrington, IL

-

3,400

66,179

-

3,400

66,179

421

2012

2000

Lake Zurich, IL

-

1,470

9,830

-

1,470

9,830

459

2011

2007

Lakewood Ranch, FL

-

650

6,714

-

650

6,714

117

2011

2012

Lakewood Ranch, FL

7,569

1,000

22,388

-

1,000

22,388

295

2012

2005

Lancaster, PA

-

890

7,623

80

890

7,702

419

2011

1928

Lancaster, NH

-

430

15,804

161

430

15,964

757

2011

1981

Lancaster, NH

-

160

434

28

160

462

42

2011

1905

Langhorne, PA

-

1,350

24,881

117

1,350

24,998

1,221

2011

1979

Lapeer, MI

-

220

7,625

-

220

7,625

82

2011

2012

LaPlata, MD (2)

-

700

19,068

-

700

19,068

935

2011

1984

Lawrence, KS

3,797

250

8,716

-

250

8,716

114

2012

1996

Lebanon, NH

-

550

20,138

64

550

20,202

962

2011

1985

Lecanto, FL

-

200

6,900

-

200

6,900

1,607

2004

1986

Lee, MA

-

290

18,135

926

290

19,061

5,582

2002

1998

Leicester, England

-

6,897

30,240

-

6,897

30,240

-

2012

-

Lenoir, NC

-

190

3,748

641

190

4,389

1,161

2003

1998

Leominster, MA

-

530

6,201

25

530

6,226

348

2011

1966

Lewisburg, WV

-

260

3,699

70

260

3,769

210

2011

1995

Lexington, NC

-

200

3,900

1,015

200

4,915

1,389

2002

1997

Lexington, KY

-

1,850

11,977

-

1,850

11,977

-

2011

-

Libertyville, IL

-

6,500

40,024

-

6,500

40,024

1,848

2011

2001

Lincoln, NE

5,131

390

13,807

-

390

13,807

964

2010

2000

Linwood, NJ

-

800

21,984

429

800

22,413

1,178

2010

1997

Litchfield, CT

-

1,240

17,908

102

1,250

18,000

933

2010

1998

Little Neck, NY

-

3,350

38,461

426

3,355

38,882

2,008

2010

2000

Loganville, GA

-

1,430

22,912

-

1,430

22,912

215

2012

1997

Longview, TX

-

610

5,520

-

610

5,520

831

2006

2007

Longwood, FL

-

1,260

6,445

-

1,260

6,445

222

2011

2011

Louisville, KY

-

490

10,010

-

490

10,010

2,650

2005

1978

Louisville, KY

-

430

7,135

163

430

7,298

2,443

2002

1974

Louisville, KY

-

350

4,675

109

350

4,784

1,637

2002

1975

Lowell, MA

-

1,070

13,481

92

1,070

13,573

694

2011

1975

Lowell, MA

-

680

3,378

30

680

3,408

213

2011

1969

Lutherville, MD

-

1,100

19,786

1,579

1,100

21,365

969

2011

1988

Macungie, PA

-

960

29,033

17

960

29,049

1,364

2011

1994

Mahwah, NJ

-

785

-

-

785

-

-

2012

Manahawkin, NJ

-

1,020

20,361

122

1,020

20,483

991

2011

1994

Manalapan, NJ

-

900

22,624

56

900

22,680

795

2011

2001

Manassas, VA

-

750

7,446

530

750

7,976

1,875

2003

1996

Mansfield, TX

-

660

5,251

-

660

5,251

800

2006

2007

Marianna, FL

-

340

8,910

-

340

8,910

1,573

2006

1997

Marietta, GA

-

1,270

10,519

-

1,270

10,519

94

2012

1997

Marlinton, WV

-

270

8,430

-

270

8,430

418

2011

1987

Marmet, WV

-

540

26,483

-

540

26,483

1,225

2011

1986

Martinsburg, WV

-

340

17,180

31

340

17,211

802

2011

1987

Martinsville, VA

-

349

-

-

349

-

-

2003

Matawan, NJ

-

1,830

20,618

-

1,830

20,618

589

2011

1965

Matthews, NC

-

560

4,738

-

560

4,738

1,295

2003

1998

McConnelsville, OH

-

190

7,060

-

190

7,060

514

2010

1946

McHenry, IL

-

1,576

-

-

1,576

-

-

2006

McHenry, IL

-

3,550

15,300

6,718

3,550

22,018

3,105

2006

2004

McKinney, TX

-

1,570

7,389

-

1,570

7,389

592

2009

2010

McMurray, PA

-

1,440

15,805

1,894

1,440

17,699

489

2010

2011

Melbourne, FL

-

7,070

48,257

12,990

7,070

61,247

4,901

2007

2009

Melbourne, FL

-

2,540

21,319

-

2,540

21,319

503

2010

2012

Melville, NY

-

4,280

73,283

722

4,282

74,003

3,762

2010

2001

Memphis, TN

-

940

5,963

-

940

5,963

1,733

2004

1951

Memphis, TN

-

390

9,660

1,600

390

11,260

652

2010

1981

Mendham, NJ

-

1,240

27,169

375

1,240

27,544

1,281

2011

1968

Menomonee Falls, WI

-

1,020

6,984

-

1,020

6,984

980

2006

2007

Mercerville, NJ

-

860

9,929

109

860

10,039

518

2011

1967

Meriden, CT

-

1,300

1,472

5

1,300

1,477

158

2011

1968

Merrillville, IN

-

643

7,084

3,526

643

10,610

6,112

1997

1999

Merrillville, IN

-

1,080

3,413

-

1,080

3,413

195

2010

2011

Middleburg Heights, OH

-

960

7,780

-

960

7,780

1,735

2004

1998

Middleton, WI

-

420

4,006

600

420

4,606

1,229

2001

1991

Middletown, RI

-

1,480

19,703

-

1,480

19,703

970

2011

1975

Midland, MI

-

200

11,025

39

200

11,064

598

2010

1994

Milford, DE

-

400

7,816

40

400

7,855

400

2011

1997

Milford, DE

-

680

19,216

56

680

19,273

940

2011

1905

Millersville, MD

-

680

1,020

25

680

1,045

411

2011

1962

Millville, NJ

-

840

29,944

85

840

30,030

1,433

2011

1986

Missoula, MT

-

550

7,490

377

550

7,867

1,503

2005

1998

Monmouth Junction, NJ

-

720

6,209

57

720

6,266

341

2011

1996

Monroe, NC

-

470

3,681

648

470

4,329

1,175

2003

2001

Monroe, NC

-

310

4,799

857

310

5,656

1,446

2003

2000

Monroe, NC

-

450

4,021

114

450

4,135

1,119

2003

1997

Monroe Twp, NJ

-

1,160

13,193

75

1,160

13,268

690

2011

1996

Monteagle, TN

-

310

3,318

-

310

3,318

1,061

2003

1980

Monterey, TN

-

-

4,195

410

-

4,605

2,454

2004

1977

Montville, NJ

-

3,500

31,002

135

3,500

31,137

1,112

2011

1988

Moorestown, NJ

-

2,060

51,628

267

2,063

51,892

2,668

2010

2000

Morehead City, NC

-

200

3,104

1,648

200

4,752

1,593

1999

1999

Morgantown, KY

-

380

3,705

615

380

4,320

1,128

2003

1965

Morgantown, WV

-

190

15,633

-

190

15,633

414

2011

1997

Morton Grove, IL

-

1,900

19,374

-

1,900

19,374

568

2010

2011

Mount Airy, NC

-

270

6,430

290

270

6,720

1,199

2005

1998

Mountain City, TN

-

220

5,896

660

220

6,556

3,568

2001

1976

Mt. Vernon, WA

-

400

2,200

156

400

2,356

375

2006

2001

Myrtle Beach, SC

-

6,890

41,526

11,498

6,890

53,024

4,281

2007

2009

Nacogdoches, TX

-

390

5,754

-

390

5,754

857

2006

2007

Naperville, IL

-

3,470

29,547

-

3,470

29,547

1,390

2011

2001

Naples, FL

-

550

5,450

-

550

5,450

1,361

2004

1968

Nashville, TN

-

4,910

29,590

-

4,910

29,590

3,567

2008

2007

Naugatuck, CT

-

1,200

15,826

99

1,200

15,924

781

2011

1980

Needham, MA

-

1,610

13,715

366

1,610

14,081

4,576

2002

1994

Neenah, WI

-

630

15,120

-

630

15,120

1,032

2010

1991

New Braunfels, TX

-

1,200

19,800

-

1,200

19,800

933

2011

2009

New Haven, IN

-

176

3,524

-

176

3,524

1,046

2004

1981

Newark, DE

-

560

21,220

1,488

560

22,708

4,595

2004

1998

Newport, VT

-

290

3,867

-

290

3,867

211

2011

1967

Norman, OK

-

55

1,484

-

55

1,484

751

1995

1995

Norman, OK

11,524

1,480

33,330

-

1,480

33,330

431

2012

1985

Norristown, PA

-

1,200

19,488

1,135

1,200

20,623

948

2011

1995

North Andover, MA

-

950

21,817

54

950

21,870

1,047

2011

1977

North Andover, MA

-

1,070

17,341

1,293

1,070

18,634

879

2011

1990

North Augusta, SC

-

332

2,558

-

332

2,558

990

1999

1998

North Cape May, NJ

-

600

22,266

36

600

22,302

1,062

2011

1995

Oak Hill, WV

-

240

24,506

-

240

24,506

1,132

2011

1988

Oak Hill, WV

-

170

721

-

170

721

73

2011

1999

Ocala, FL

-

1,340

10,564

-

1,340

10,564

973

2008

2009

Ogden, UT

-

360

6,700

699

360

7,399

1,534

2004

1998

Oklahoma City, OK

-

590

7,513

-

590

7,513

932

2007

2008

Oklahoma City, OK

-

760

7,017

-

760

7,017

767

2007

2009

Omaha, NE

-

370

10,230

-

370

10,230

730

2010

1998

Omaha, NE

4,419

380

8,864

-

380

8,864

654

2010

1999

Oneonta, NY

-

80

5,020

-

80

5,020

679

2007

1996

Ormond Beach, FL

-

-

2,739

73

-

2,812

1,495

2002

1983

Orwigsburg, PA

-

650

20,632

134

650

20,766

999

2011

1992

Oshkosh, WI

-

900

3,800

3,687

900

7,487

1,272

2006

2005

Oshkosh, WI

-

400

23,237

-

400

23,237

2,424

2007

2008

Overland Park, KS

-

1,120

8,360

-

1,120

8,360

1,763

2005

1970

Overland Park, KS

-

3,730

27,076

340

3,730

27,416

2,317

2008

2009

Overland Park, KS

-

4,500

29,105

7,295

4,500

36,400

2,007

2010

1988

Owasso, OK

-

215

1,380

-

215

1,380

608

1996

1996

Owensboro, KY

-

240

6,760

37

240

6,797

1,528

1993

1966

Owensboro, KY

-

225

13,275

-

225

13,275

2,912

2005

1964

Owenton, KY

-

100

2,400

-

100

2,400

647

2005

1979

Oxford, MI

11,710

1,430

15,791

-

1,430

15,791

906

2010

2001

Palestine, TX

-

180

4,320

1,300

180

5,620

890

2006

2005

Palm Coast, FL

-

870

10,957

-

870

10,957

877

2008

2010

Panama City Beach, FL

-

900

7,717

9

900

7,726

322

2011

2005

Paris, TX

-

490

5,452

-

490

5,452

2,240

2005

2006

Parkersburg, WV

-

390

21,288

643

390

21,931

1,012

2011

1979

Parkville, MD

-

1,350

16,071

212

1,350

16,284

801

2011

1980

Parkville, MD

-

791

11,186

-

791

11,186

571

2011

1972

Parkville, MD

-

1,100

11,768

-

1,100

11,768

595

2011

1972

Pasadena, TX

9,955

720

24,080

-

720

24,080

3,664

2007

2005

Paso Robles, CA

-

1,770

8,630

693

1,770

9,323

2,656

2002

1998

Pawleys Island, SC

-

2,020

32,590

6,022

2,020

38,612

6,600

2005

1997

Pella, IA

-

870

6,716

-

870

6,716

59

2012

2002

Pennington, NJ

-

1,380

27,620

426

1,420

28,006

860

2011

2000

Pennsauken, NJ

-

900

10,780

179

900

10,959

602

2011

1985

Petoskey, MI

6,293

860

14,452

-

860

14,452

739

2011

1997

Philadelphia, PA

-

2,700

25,709

333

2,700

26,041

1,259

2011

1976

Philadelphia, PA

-

2,930

10,433

2,642

2,930

13,075

632

2011

1952

Philadelphia, PA

-

540

11,239

62

540

11,302

532

2011

1965

Philadelphia, PA

-

1,810

16,898

32

1,810

16,931

902

2011

1972

Phillipsburg, NJ

-

800

21,175

193

800

21,368

1,044

2011

1992

Phillipsburg, NJ

-

300

8,114

38

300

8,151

399

2011

1905

Pigeon Forge, TN

-

320

4,180

117

320

4,297

1,510

2001

1986

Pinehurst, NC

-

290

2,690

484

290

3,174

892

2003

1998

Piqua, OH

-

204

1,885

-

204

1,885

755

1997

1997

Pittsburgh, PA

-

1,750

8,572

115

1,750

8,687

1,899

2005

1998

Plainview, NY

-

3,990

11,969

94

3,990

12,064

480

2011

1963

Plattsmouth, NE

-

250

5,650

-

250

5,650

424

2010

1999

Plymouth, MI

-

1,490

19,990

114

1,490

20,104

1,093

2010

1972

Port St. Joe, FL

-

370

2,055

-

370

2,055

863

2004

1982

Port St. Lucie, FL

-

8,700

47,230

4,761

8,700

51,991

3,550

2008

2010

Post Falls, ID

-

2,700

14,217

2,181

2,700

16,398

1,845

2007

2008

Pottsville, PA

-

950

26,964

202

950

27,166

1,319

2011

1990

Princeton, NJ

-

1,730

30,888

817

1,772

31,663

977

2011

2001

Quakertown, PA

-

1,040

25,389

72

1,040

25,461

1,213

2011

1977

Raleigh, NC

-

10,000

-

-

10,000

-

-

2008

Raleigh, NC

26,506

3,530

59,589

-

3,530

59,589

395

2012

2002

Raleigh, NC

-

2,580

16,837

-

2,580

16,837

156

2012

1988

Reading, PA

-

980

19,906

102

980

20,008

967

2011

1994

Red Bank, NJ

-

1,050

21,275

97

1,050

21,372

748

2011

1997

Rehoboth Beach, DE

-

960

24,248

196

961

24,443

1,269

2010

1999

Reidsville, NC

-

170

3,830

857

170

4,687

1,341

2002

1998

Reno, NV

-

1,060

11,440

605

1,060

12,045

2,569

2004

1998

Ridgeland, MS

-

520

7,675

427

520

8,102

1,926

2003

1997

Ridgely, TN

-

300

5,700

97

300

5,797

1,872

2001

1990

Ridgewood, NJ

-

1,350

16,170

478

1,350

16,649

780

2011

1971

Rockledge, FL

-

360

4,117

-

360

4,117

1,677

2001

1970

Rockville, MD

-

-

16,398

-

-

16,398

279

2012

1986

Rockville, CT

-

1,500

4,835

76

1,500

4,911

320

2011

1960

Rockville Centre, NY

-

4,290

20,310

142

4,290

20,452

756

2011

2002

Rockwood, TN

-

500

7,116

741

500

7,857

2,521

2001

1979

Rocky Hill, CT

-

1,090

6,710

1,500

1,090

8,210

1,842

2003

1996

Rogersville, TN

-

350

3,278

-

350

3,278

1,052

2003

1980

Romeoville, IL

-

1,895

-

-

1,895

-

-

2006

Rutland, VT

-

1,190

23,655

87

1,190

23,743

1,151

2011

1968

Saint Simons Island, GA

-

6,440

50,060

1,270

6,440

51,330

5,809

2008

2007

Salem, OR

-

449

5,171

-

449

5,172

1,977

1999

1998

Salisbury, NC

-

370

5,697

168

370

5,865

1,517

2003

1997

San Angelo, TX

-

260

8,800

425

260

9,225

1,927

2004

1997

San Antonio, TX

-

6,120

28,169

1,587

6,120

29,756

999

2010

2011

San Antonio, TX

10,754

560

7,315

-

560

7,315

2,258

2002

2000

San Antonio, TX

9,912

640

13,360

-

640

13,360

2,124

2007

2004

Sanatoga, PA

-

980

30,695

37

980

30,733

1,439

2011

1993

Sand Springs, OK

6,792

910

19,654

-

910

19,654

259

2012

2002

Sarasota, FL

-

475

3,175

-

475

3,175

1,474

1996

1995

Sarasota, FL

-

600

3,400

-

600

3,400

947

2004

1982

Sarasota, FL

-

1,120

12,489

-

1,120

12,489

114

2012

1999

Sarasota, FL

-

950

8,825

-

950

8,825

80

2012

1998

Sarasota, FL

-

880

9,854

-

880

9,854

94

2012

1990

Scituate, MA

-

1,740

10,640

-

1,740

10,640

2,077

2005

1976

Scott Depot, WV

-

350

6,876

58

350

6,934

351

2011

1995

Seaford, DE

-

720

14,029

53

720

14,082

718

2011

1977

Seaford, DE

-

830

7,995

-

830

7,995

112

2012

1992

Selbyville, DE

-

750

25,912

160

764

26,058

1,361

2010

2008

Seven Fields, PA

-

484

4,663

60

484

4,722

1,813

1999

1999

Severna Park, MD (2)

-

2,120

31,273

-

2,120

31,273

1,472

2011

1981

Shawnee, OK

-

80

1,400

-

80

1,400

640

1996

1995

Sheboygan, WI

-

80

5,320

3,774

80

9,094

1,143

2006

2006

Shelbyville, KY

-

630

3,870

-

630

3,870

859

2005

1965

Shelton, WA

-

530

17,049

-

530

17,049

237

2012

1989

Shepherdstown, WV

-

250

13,806

14

250

13,819

650

2011

1990

Sherman, TX

-

700

5,221

-

700

5,221

848

2005

2006

Shillington, PA

-

1,020

19,569

118

1,020

19,687

956

2011

1964

Shrewsbury, NJ

-

2,120

38,116

270

2,120

38,386

1,984

2010

2000

Silver Spring, MD

-

1,250

7,278

-

1,250

7,278

125

2012

1952

Silver Spring, MD

-

1,150

9,252

-

1,150

9,252

152

2012

1968

Silvis, IL

-

880

16,420

-

880

16,420

1,029

2010

2005

Sissonville, WV

-

600

23,948

54

600

24,003

1,136

2011

1981

Sisterville, WV

-

200

5,400

242

200

5,642

287

2011

1986

Smithfield, NC

-

290

5,680

-

290

5,680

1,487

2003

1998

Somerset, MA

-

1,010

29,577

95

1,010

29,671

1,394

2011

1998

South Boston, MA

-

385

2,002

5,218

385

7,220

2,823

1995

1961

South Pittsburg, TN

-

430

5,628

-

430

5,628

1,547

2004

1979

Southbury, CT

-

1,860

23,613

958

1,860

24,571

1,102

2011

2001

Sparks, NV

-

3,700

46,526

-

3,700

46,526

4,326

2007

2009

Spartanburg, SC

-

3,350

15,750

12,669

3,350

28,419

3,816

2005

1997

Spencer, WV

-

190

8,810

28

190

8,838

431

2011

1988

Spring City, TN

-

420

6,085

3,210

420

9,295

2,663

2001

1987

Spring House, PA

-

900

10,780

156

900

10,936

561

2011

1900

St. Charles, MD

-

580

15,555

82

580

15,636

765

2011

1996

St. Louis, MO

-

1,890

12,165

-

1,890

12,165

707

2010

1963

Statesville, NC

-

150

1,447

266

150

1,713

480

2003

1990

Statesville, NC

-

310

6,183

8

310

6,191

1,566

2003

1996

Statesville, NC

-

140

3,627

-

140

3,627

946

2003

1999

Stillwater, OK

-

80

1,400

-

80

1,400

643

1995

1995

Summit, NJ

-

3,080

14,152

-

3,080

14,152

660

2011

2001

Superior, WI

-

1,020

13,735

-

1,020

13,735

-

2009

-

Swanton, OH

-

330

6,370

-

330

6,370

1,504

2004

1950

Takoma Park, MD

-

1,300

10,136

-

1,300

10,136

172

2012

1962

Texarkana, TX

-

192

1,403

-

192

1,403

617

1996

1996

Thomasville, GA

-

530

13,899

409

530

14,308

569

2011

2006

Tomball, TX

-

1,050

13,300

-

1,050

13,300

655

2011

2001

Toms River, NJ

-

1,610

34,627

346

1,650

34,933

1,819

2010

2005

Topeka, KS

-

260

12,712

-

260

12,712

173

2012

2011

Towson, MD (2)

-

1,180

13,280

-

1,180

13,280

667

2011

1973

Troy, OH

-

200

2,000

4,254

200

6,254

1,168

1997

1997

Troy, OH

-

470

16,730

-

470

16,730

3,803

2004

1971

Trumbull, CT

-

4,440

43,384

-

4,440

43,384

1,930

2011

2001

Tucson, AZ

-

930

13,399

-

930

13,399

2,692

2005

1985

Tulsa, OK

-

1,390

7,110

219

1,390

7,329

561

2010

1998

Tulsa, OK

-

1,320

10,087

-

1,320

10,087

49

2011

2012

Tyler, TX

-

650

5,268

-

650

5,268

796

2006

2007

Uhrichsville, OH

-

24

6,716

-

24

6,716

1,308

2006

1977

Uniontown, PA

-

310

6,817

84

310

6,901

343

2011

1964

Valley Falls, RI

-

1,080

7,433

10

1,080

7,443

378

2011

1975

Valparaiso, IN

-

112

2,558

-

112

2,558

835

2001

1998

Valparaiso, IN

-

108

2,962

-

108

2,962

946

2001

1999

Venice, FL

-

500

6,000

-

500

6,000

1,472

2004

1987

Venice, FL

-

1,150

10,674

-

1,150

10,674

906

2008

2009

Vero Beach, FL

-

263

3,187

-

263

3,187

1,007

2001

1999

Vero Beach, FL

-

297

3,263

-

297

3,263

1,041

2001

1996

Vero Beach, FL

-

2,930

40,070

14,729

2,930

54,799

6,268

2007

2003

Voorhees, NJ

-

1,800

37,299

559

1,800

37,858

1,809

2011

1965

Voorhees, NJ (2)

-

1,900

26,040

-

1,900

26,040

1,278

2011

1985

Waconia, MN

-

890

14,726

4,334

890

19,060

547

2011

2005

Wake Forest, NC

-

200

3,003

1,742

200

4,745

1,640

1998

1999

Walkersville, MD

-

1,650

15,103

-

1,650

15,103

250

2012

1997

Wall, NJ

-

1,650

25,350

355

1,690

25,665

792

2011

2003

Wallingford, CT

-

490

1,210

46

490

1,256

103

2011

1962

Wareham, MA

-

875

10,313

1,701

875

12,014

3,650

2002

1989

Warren, NJ

-

2,000

30,810

86

2,000

30,896

1,072

2011

1999

Warwick, RI

-

1,530

18,564

48

1,530

18,612

924

2011

1963

Watchung, NJ

-

1,920

24,880

346

1,960

25,186

778

2011

2000

Waukee, IA

-

1,870

31,878

-

1,870

31,878

277

2012

2007

Waukesha, WI

-

1,100

14,910

-

1,100

14,910

1,206

2008

2009

Waxahachie, TX

-

650

5,763

-

650

5,763

728

2007

2008

Weatherford, TX

-

660

5,261

-

660

5,261

801

2006

2007

Webster, TX

9,473

360

5,940

-

360

5,940

1,826

2002

2000

Webster, NY

-

800

8,968

-

800

8,968

60

2012

2001

Webster, NY

-

1,300

21,127

-

1,300

21,127

136

2012

2001

Webster Groves, MO

-

1,790

15,469

-

1,790

15,469

137

2011

2012

West Bend, WI

-

620

17,790

-

620

17,790

472

2010

2011

West Chester, PA

-

1,350

29,237

95

1,350

29,332

1,411

2011

1974

West Chester, PA

-

3,290

42,258

-

3,290

42,258

844

2012

2000

West Chester, PA

-

600

11,894

-

600

11,894

242

2012

2002

West Orange, NJ

-

2,280

10,687

168

2,280

10,855

580

2011

1963

West Worthington, OH

-

510

5,090

-

510

5,090

1,031

2006

1980

Westerville, OH

-

740

8,287

3,105

740

11,392

6,416

1998

2001

Westfield, NJ (2)

-

2,270

16,589

-

2,270

16,589

890

2011

1970

Westford, MA

-

920

13,829

203

920

14,032

695

2011

1993

Westlake, OH

-

1,330

17,926

-

1,330

17,926

5,570

2001

1985

Westmoreland, TN

-

330

1,822

2,635

330

4,457

1,492

2001

1994

White Lake, MI

10,713

2,920

20,179

55

2,920

20,234

1,126

2010

2000

Wichita, KS

-

1,400

11,000

-

1,400

11,000

2,178

2006

1997

Wichita, KS

-

1,760

19,007

-

1,760

19,007

414

2011

2012

Wichita, KS

13,828

630

19,747

-

630

19,747

257

2012

2009

Wilkes-Barre, PA

-

610

13,842

95

610

13,937

695

2011

1986

Wilkes-Barre, PA

-

570

2,301

44

570

2,345

183

2011

1992

Willard, OH

-

730

6,447

-

730

6,447

96

2011

2012

Williamsport, PA

-

300

4,946

280

300

5,226

263

2011

1991

Williamsport, PA

-

620

8,487

428

620

8,914

464

2011

1988

Williamstown, KY

-

70

6,430

-

70

6,430

1,424

2005

1987

Willow Grove, PA

-

1,300

14,736

109

1,300

14,845

771

2011

1905

Wilmington, DE

-

800

9,494

57

800

9,551

493

2011

1970

Wilmington, NC

-

210

2,991

-

210

2,991

1,137

1999

1999

Windsor, CT

-

2,250

8,539

1,700

2,250

10,239

502

2011

1969

Windsor, CT

-

1,800

600

944

1,800

1,544

100

2011

1974

Winston-Salem, NC

-

360

2,514

459

360

2,973

805

2003

1996

Winston-Salem, NC

-

5,700

13,550

12,239

5,700

25,789

4,108

2005

1997

Worcester, MA

-

3,500

54,099

-

3,500

54,099

4,345

2007

2009

Worcester, MA

-

2,300

9,060

-

2,300

9,060

1,087

2008

1993

Wyncote, PA

-

2,700

22,244

145

2,700

22,389

1,106

2011

1960

Wyncote, PA

-

1,610

21,256

182

1,610

21,438

1,009

2011

1962

Wyncote, PA

-

900

7,811

18

900

7,829

386

2011

1889

Zionsville, IN

-

1,610

22,400

1,691

1,610

24,091

1,378

2010

2009

Seniors housing triple-net total

$

218,741

$

623,120

$

7,462,660

$

341,850

$

625,388

$

7,802,238

$

707,213

110


Health Care REIT, Inc.

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

Initial Cost to Company

Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period

Description

Encumbrances

Land

Building & Improvements

Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition

Land

Building & Improvements

Accumulated Depreciation (1)

Year Acquired

Year Built

Seniors housing operating:

Agawam, MA

$

6,805

$

880

$

10,044

$

83

$

880

$

10,127

$

1,119

2011

1996

Albertville, AL

2,066

170

6,203

158

170

6,361

672

2010

1999

Albuquerque, NM

5,657

1,270

20,837

564

1,272

21,399

2,569

2010

1984

Alhambra, CA

3,012

600

6,305

52

600

6,357

554

2011

1923

Altrincham, England

-

5,578

32,373

-

5,578

32,373

625

2012

2009

Apple Valley, CA

10,979

480

16,639

107

480

16,746

2,083

2010

1999

Arlington, TX

22,542

1,660

37,395

-

1,660

37,395

214

2012

2000

Atlanta, GA

7,791

2,058

14,914

759

2,059

15,672

9,456

1997

1999

Austin, TX

19,309

880

9,520

546

880

10,066

3,817

1999

1998

Avon, CT

20,033

1,550

30,571

159

1,550

30,731

4,460

2011

1998

Azusa, CA

-

570

3,141

6,049

570

9,190

1,549

1998

1953

Bagshot, England

-

6,537

38,668

-

6,537

38,668

784

2012

2009

Banstead, England

-

8,781

54,836

-

8,781

54,836

-

2012

2005

Bellingham, WA

8,860

1,500

19,861

110

1,500

19,971

2,350

2010

1996

Belmont, CA

-

3,000

23,526

246

3,000

23,771

2,651

2011

1971

Borehamwood, England

-

7,074

41,060

-

7,074

41,060

-

2012

2003

Brighton, MA

10,899

2,100

14,616

95

2,100

14,711

1,736

2011

1995

Brookfield, CT

20,414

2,250

30,180

172

2,250

30,352

3,650

2011

1999

Buffalo Grove, IL

-

2,850

49,129

-

2,850

49,129

261

2012

2003

Burbank, CA

-

4,940

43,466

-

4,940

43,466

263

2012

2002

Cardiff by the Sea, CA

41,836

5,880

64,711

66

5,880

64,777

4,842

2011

2009

Carol Stream, IL

-

1,730

55,048

-

1,730

55,048

276

2012

2001

Centerville, MA

-

1,300

27,357

189

1,300

27,546

2,403

2011

1998

Cincinnati, OH

-

2,060

109,388

2,602

2,060

111,990

7,006

2007

2010

Citrus Heights, CA

15,189

2,300

31,876

428

2,300

32,304

3,897

2010

1997

Concord, NH

14,055

720

21,164

138

720

21,302

1,732

2011

2001

Costa Mesa, CA

-

2,050

19,969

45

2,050

20,014

2,257

2011

1965

Dallas, TX

-

1,080

9,655

116

1,080

9,771

891

2011

1997

Danvers, MA

9,857

1,120

14,557

121

1,120

14,677

1,410

2011

2000

Davenport, IA

-

1,403

35,893

2,063

1,403

37,956

3,250

2006

2009

Denver, CO

-

2,910

35,838

-

2,910

35,838

196

2012

2007

Denver, CO

13,161

1,450

19,389

-

1,450

19,389

110

2012

1997

Dublin, OH

18,884

1,680

43,423

941

1,680

44,364

4,501

2010

1990

East Haven, CT

23,721

2,660

35,533

426

2,660

35,959

5,310

2011

2000

Encinitas, CA

-

1,460

7,721

353

1,460

8,074

2,882

2000

1988

Encino, CA

-

5,040

46,255

-

5,040

46,255

285

2012

2003

Escondido, CA

13,182

1,520

24,024

106

1,520

24,131

2,677

2011

1987

Florence, AL

7,267

353

13,049

165

350

13,217

1,512

2010

1999

Fort Worth, TX

-

2,080

27,888

-

2,080

27,888

180

2012

2001

Fremont, CA

19,780

3,400

25,300

1,649

3,400

26,949

5,010

2005

1987

Gardnerville, NV

12,783

1,143

10,831

694

1,144

11,524

7,408

1998

1999

Gig Harbor, WA

5,789

1,560

15,947

71

1,560

16,018

1,843

2010

1994

Gilroy, CA

-

760

13,880

23,935

1,520

37,055

5,004

2006

2007

Glenview, IL

-

2,090

69,288

-

2,090

69,288

362

2012

2001

Hamden, CT

15,963

1,460

24,093

203

1,460

24,296

3,001

2011

1999

Hemet, CA

13,550

1,890

28,606

449

1,890

29,055

4,961

2010

1989

Hemet, CA

-

430

9,630

716

430

10,346

871

2010

1988

Henderson, NV

-

880

29,809

6

880

29,816

1,722

2011

2009

Houston, TX

-

3,830

55,674

-

3,830

55,674

3,560

2012

1998

Houston, TX

8,149

960

27,598

143

960

27,742

2,609

2011

1995

Houston, TX

18,509

1,040

31,965

-

1,040

31,965

225

2012

1999

Irving, TX

-

1,030

6,823

638

1,030

7,461

919

2007

1999

Kanata, ON

-

2,278

41,881

-

2,278

41,881

1,369

2012

2005

Kansas City, MO

5,745

1,820

34,898

1,473

1,836

36,355

4,077

2010

1980

Kansas City, MO

7,030

1,930

39,997

509

1,943

40,493

5,402

2010

1986

Kennewick, WA

14,866

1,820

27,991

235

1,820

28,226

4,318

2010

1994

Kingwood, TX

3,258

480

9,777

79

480

9,856

914

2011

1999

Kirkland, WA

24,600

3,450

38,709

15

3,450

38,723

2,570

2011

2009

Lancaster, CA

10,240

700

15,295

106

700

15,401

2,075

2010

1999

Leawood, KS

16,383

2,490

32,493

-

2,490

32,493

198

2012

1999

Los Angeles, CA

-

-

11,430

494

-

11,924

962

2008

1971

Los Angeles, CA

67,816

-

114,438

153

-

114,591

8,162

2011

2009

Los Angeles, CA

-

3,540

19,007

-

3,540

19,007

132

2012

2001

Louisville, KY

-

2,420

20,816

-

2,420

20,816

138

2012

1999

Mansfield, MA

29,381

3,320

57,011

479

3,320

57,490

6,447

2011

1998

Manteca, CA

6,279

1,300

12,125

1,423

1,300

13,548

2,608

2005

1986

Marysville, WA

4,652

620

4,780

302

620

5,082

1,242

2003

1998

Memphis, TN

-

1,800

17,744

-

1,800

17,744

1,544

2012

1999

Meriden, CT

9,730

1,500

14,874

236

1,500

15,110

2,667

2011

2001

Mesa, AZ

6,201

950

9,087

576

950

9,663

3,228

1999

2000

Middletown, CT

16,026

1,430

24,242

190

1,430

24,432

3,227

2011

1999

Middletown, RI

17,044

2,480

24,628

325

2,480

24,953

3,143

2011

1998

Milford, CT

11,956

3,210

17,364

253

3,210

17,617

2,361

2011

1999

Mill Creek, WA

29,622

10,150

60,274

419

10,150

60,693

9,422

2010

1998

Minnetonka, MN

14,935

2,080

24,360

-

2,080

24,360

144

2012

1999

Monroe, WA

13,791

2,560

34,460

243

2,560

34,703

4,098

2010

1994

Mystic, CT

11,956

1,400

18,274

213

1,400

18,487

1,928

2011

2001

Naples, FL

-

1,716

17,306

1,647

1,716

18,953

14,963

1997

1999

Nashville, TN

-

3,900

35,788

-

3,900

35,788

2,595

2012

1999

Newton, MA

29,000

2,250

43,614

116

2,250

43,730

4,354

2011

1996

Newton, MA

16,745

2,500

30,681

1,058

2,500

31,739

3,633

2011

1996

Newton, MA

-

3,360

25,099

195

3,360

25,294

3,272

2011

1994

Niantic, CT

-

1,320

25,986

241

1,320

26,227

2,319

2011

2001

North Andover, MA

23,530

1,960

34,976

209

1,960

35,185

3,882

2011

1995

North Chelmsford, MA

12,401

880

18,478

199

880

18,677

1,617

2011

1998

Oak Park, IL

-

1,250

40,383

-

1,250

40,383

212

2012

2004

Oceanside, CA

13,173

2,160

18,352

106

2,160

18,458

1,777

2011

2005

Olympia, WA

7,026

550

16,689

195

550

16,884

1,976

2010

1995

Overland Park, KS

3,648

1,540

16,269

-

1,540

16,269

103

2012

1998

Pembroke, ON

-

2,603

13,630

-

2,603

13,630

429

2012

1999

Plano, TX

4,286

840

8,538

154

840

8,691

989

2011

1996

Providence, RI

-

2,600

27,546

485

2,600

28,031

4,658

2011

1998

Purley, England

-

9,676

35,251

-

9,676

35,251

-

2012

2005

Puyallup, WA

11,586

1,150

20,776

241

1,150

21,017

2,616

2010

1985

Quincy, MA

8,585

1,350

12,584

162

1,350

12,746

1,480

2011

1998

Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

-

5,450

60,034

-

5,450

60,034

347

2012

2004

Redondo Beach, CA

7,873

-

9,557

1

-

9,558

1,531

2011

1957

Renton, WA

22,620

3,080

51,824

34

3,080

51,858

3,327

2011

2007

Rocky Hill, CT

10,811

810

16,351

147

810

16,498

1,638

2011

2000

Rohnert Park, CA

13,912

6,500

18,700

1,519

6,500

20,219

3,798

2005

1986

Romeoville, IL

-

854

12,646

58,559

6,114

65,945

5,084

2006

2010

Roswell, GA

8,000

1,107

9,627

498

1,107

10,125

6,606

1997

1999

Roswell, GA

-

2,080

6,486

-

2,080

6,486

50

2012

1997

Sacramento, CA

10,456

940

14,781

112

940

14,893

1,842

2010

1978

Salem, NH

21,686

980

32,721

159

980

32,880

2,942

2011

2000

Salt Lake City, UT

-

1,360

19,691

115

1,360

19,805

3,288

2011

1986

San Diego, CA

-

4,200

30,707

4

4,200

30,711

865

2011

2011

San Diego, CA

-

5,810

63,078

-

5,810

63,078

4,168

2012

2001

San Jose, CA

-

2,850

35,098

21

2,850

35,119

2,598

2011

2009

San Jose, CA

-

3,280

46,823

-

3,280

46,823

290

2012

2002

San Juan Capistrano, CA

-

1,390

6,942

136

1,390

7,078

2,276

2000

2001

San Ramon, CA

9,371

2,430

17,488

68

2,430

17,556

2,060

2010

1989

Sandy Springs, GA

-

2,214

8,360

-

2,214

8,360

987

2012

1997

Santa Maria, CA

-

6,050

50,658

217

6,050

50,875

3,681

2011

2001

Scottsdale, AZ

-

2,500

3,890

853

2,500

4,743

572

2008

1998

Seatlle, WA

48,543

6,790

85,369

261

6,790

85,631

5,152

2011

2009

Seattle, WA

7,758

5,190

9,350

374

5,190

9,724

2,134

2010

1962

Seattle, WA

7,575

3,420

15,555

64

3,420

15,619

2,161

2010

2000

Seattle, WA

9,263

2,630

10,257

41

2,630

10,298

1,515

2010

2003

Seattle, WA

28,965

10,670

37,291

143

10,670

37,434

6,455

2010

2005

Sevenoaks, England

-

8,131

51,963

-

8,131

51,963

1,104

2012

2009

Shelburne, VT

20,605

720

31,041

145

720

31,187

2,534

2011

1988

Sidcup, England

-

9,773

56,163

-

9,773

56,163

-

2012

2000

Solihull, England

-

6,667

55,336

-

6,667

55,336

893

2012

2009

Sonoma, CA

15,082

1,100

18,400

1,318

1,100

19,718

3,657

2005

1988

South Windsor, CT

-

3,000

29,295

395

3,000

29,690

4,022

2011

1999

Stanwood, WA

9,922

2,260

28,474

264

2,260

28,738

3,681

2010

1998

Stockton, CA

3,009

2,280

5,983

149

2,280

6,132

930

2010

1988

Sugar Land, TX

5,775

960

31,423

1,002

960

32,425

3,340

2011

1996

Sun City West, AZ

12,886

1,250

21,778

-

1,250

21,778

127

2012

1998

Sunnyvale, CA

-

5,420

41,682

-

5,420

41,682

262

2012

2002

Suwanee, GA

-

1,560

11,538

-

1,560

11,538

1,106

2012

2000

Tacoma, WA

19,180

2,400

35,053

59

2,400

35,111

2,251

2011

2008

The Woodlands, TX

2,619

480

12,379

93

480

12,472

1,170

2011

1999

Toledo, OH

16,352

2,040

47,129

428

2,040

47,557

6,818

2010

1985

Trumbull, CT

25,566

2,850

37,685

129

2,850

37,814

4,901

2011

1998

Tucson, AZ

4,852

830

6,179

-

830

6,179

36

2012

1997

Tulsa, OK

6,367

1,330

21,285

293

1,330

21,578

2,709

2010

1986

Tulsa, OK

8,321

1,500

20,861

255

1,500

21,116

2,959

2010

1984

Tustin, CA

7,014

840

15,299

22

840

15,321

1,289

2011

1965

Vacaville, CA

14,306

900

17,100

1,335

900

18,435

3,481

2005

1987

Vallejo, CA

14,322

4,000

18,000

1,786

4,000

19,786

3,674

2005

1989

Vallejo, CA

7,550

2,330

15,407

95

2,330

15,502

2,153

2010

1990

Vancouver, WA

12,011

1,820

19,042

107

1,820

19,149

2,425

2010

2006

Victoria, BC

8,168

3,716

18,977

-

3,716

18,977

650

2012

2002

Virginia Water, England

-

7,106

29,937

-

7,106

29,937

-

2012

2002

Warwick, RI

16,535

2,400

24,635

343

2,400

24,978

4,046

2011

1998

Waterbury, CT

25,629

2,460

39,547

368

2,460

39,915

6,036

2011

1998

Whittier, CA

11,605

4,470

22,151

277

4,470

22,428

4,200

2010

1988

Wilbraham, MA

11,574

660

17,639

146

660

17,784

1,769

2011

2000

Winchester, England

-

7,887

37,873

-

7,887

37,873

744

2012

2010

Woodbridge, CT

9,349

1,370

14,219

166

1,370

14,385

2,775

2011

1998

Worcester, MA

14,500

1,140

21,664

235

1,140

21,899

2,145

2011

1999

Yarmouth, ME

18,061

450

27,711

200

450

27,911

2,477

2011

1999

Seniors housing operating total

$

1,369,526

$

388,015

$

4,239,499

$

131,030

$

394,065

$

4,364,478

$

390,907

111


Health Care REIT, Inc.

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

Initial Cost to Company

Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period

Description

Encumbrances

Land

Building & Improvements

Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition

Land

Building & Improvements

Accumulated Depreciation (1)

Year Acquired

Year Built

Medical facilities:

Akron, OH

$

-

$

821

$

12,079

$

-

$

821

$

12,079

$

77

2012

2010

Akron, OH

-

300

20,200

-

300

20,200

1,585

2009

2008

Allen, TX

12,080

726

14,520

-

726

14,520

1,275

2012

2006

Alpharetta, GA

-

233

18,205

763

773

18,428

1,037

2011

1993

Alpharetta, GA

-

498

32,729

2,654

1,769

34,111

3,088

2011

1999

Alpharetta, GA

-

417

14,406

27

476

14,375

1,208

2011

2003

Alpharetta, GA

-

1,700

162

-

1,862

-

-

2011

Alpharetta, GA

-

628

16,063

1,114

555

17,250

1,157

2011

2007

Arcadia, CA

9,750

5,408

23,219

1,933

5,618

24,942

5,175

2006

1984

Atlanta, GA

-

4,931

18,720

2,937

5,301

21,287

5,415

2006

1991

Atlanta, GA

17,993

1,945

23,437

-

1,945

23,437

699

2012

1984

Atlanta, GA

26,745

-

42,468

-

-

42,468

1,799

2012

2006

Bartlett, TN

8,215

187

15,015

1,252

187

16,267

3,417

2007

2004

Bellaire, TX

-

4,551

46,105

-

4,551

46,105

7,883

2006

2005

Bellaire, TX

-

2,972

33,445

1,966

2,972

35,412

6,876

2006

2005

Bellevue, NE

-

-

15,833

868

-

16,701

1,525

2010

2010

Bellevue, NE

-

4,500

109,719

-

4,500

109,719

7,106

2008

2010

Bellingham, MA

-

9,270

-

-

9,270

-

-

2007

Birmingham, AL

-

52

9,950

201

52

10,151

2,196

2006

1971

Birmingham, AL

-

124

12,238

141

124

12,379

2,593

2006

1985

Birmingham, AL

-

476

18,994

196

476

19,190

3,744

2006

1989

Boardman, OH

-

80

11,787

342

80

12,130

1,214

2010

2007

Boardman, OH

-

1,200

12,800

-

1,200

12,800

1,723

2008

2008

Boca Raton, FL

13,259

109

34,002

2,096

214

35,993

7,475

2006

1995

Boca Raton, FL

-

31

11,659

-

31

11,659

-

2012

1993

Boerne, TX

-

50

13,317

-

50

13,317

870

2011

2007

Bowling Green, KY

-

3,800

26,700

149

3,800

26,849

3,066

2008

1992

Boynton Beach, FL

4,420

2,048

7,692

375

2,048

8,067

2,140

2006

1995

Boynton Beach, FL

3,965

2,048

7,403

964

2,048

8,367

1,855

2006

1997

Boynton Beach, FL

5,921

214

5,611

7,218

117

12,927

2,524

2007

1996

Bridgeton, MO

-

-

30,221

278

-

30,499

762

2011

2011

Bridgeton, MO

11,359

450

21,221

21

450

21,242

2,190

2010

2006

Burleson, TX

-

10

11,619

220

10

11,838

871

2011

2007

Carmel, IN

-

2,280

18,820

132

2,280

18,952

1,810

2011

2005

Carmel, IN

-

2,152

18,591

2,837

2,026

21,554

2,171

2011

2007

Cedar Grove, WI

-

113

618

-

113

618

64

2010

1986

Claremore, OK

8,131

132

12,829

302

132

13,131

2,881

2007

2005

Clarkson Valley, MO

-

-

35,592

-

-

35,592

3,782

2009

2010

Columbia, MD

-

2,258

18,861

-

2,258

18,861

-

2012

2002

Columbus, OH

-

415

6,764

-

415

6,764

12

2012

1994

Coral Springs, FL

-

1,598

10,627

1,080

1,636

11,668

3,068

2006

1992

Dade City, FL

-

1,211

5,511

-

1,211

5,511

282

2011

1998

Dallas, TX

14,926

137

28,690

1,067

137

29,757

6,340

2006

1995

Dallas, TX

28,450

462

53,963

-

462

53,963

1,883

2012

2004

Dayton, OH

-

730

6,515

145

730

6,660

548

2011

1988

Deerfield Beach, FL

-

2,408

7,482

187

2,408

7,668

727

2011

2001

Delray Beach, FL

-

1,882

34,767

4,857

1,943

39,563

9,440

2006

1985

Denton, TX

11,994

-

19,407

628

-

20,035

3,560

2007

2005

Edina, MN

-

310

15,132

-

310

15,132

1,321

2010

2003

El Paso, TX

10,005

677

17,075

1,471

677

18,546

4,344

2006

1997

El Paso, TX

-

600

6,700

-

600

6,700

823

2008

2003

El Paso, TX

-

2,400

32,800

424

2,400

33,224

7,570

2008

2003

Everett, WA

-

4,842

26,010

-

4,842

26,010

1,828

2010

2011

Fayetteville, GA

3,202

959

7,540

721

986

8,234

1,873

2006

1999

Fort Wayne, IN

16,822

1,105

22,836

-

1,105

22,836

473

2012

2004

Fort Wayne, IN

-

170

8,232

-

170

8,232

1,204

2006

2006

Fort Worth, TX

-

450

13,615

-

450

13,615

748

2010

2011

Franklin, TN

-

2,338

12,138

1,468

2,338

13,606

2,740

2007

1988

Franklin, WI

5,383

6,872

7,550

-

6,872

7,550

820

2010

1984

Fresno, CA

-

2,500

35,800

118

2,500

35,918

4,109

2008

1991

Frisco, TX

8,881

-

18,635

246

-

18,881

3,859

2007

2004

Frisco, TX

-

-

15,309

1,566

-

16,875

3,692

2007

2004

Frisco, TX

-

130

16,445

-

130

16,445

319

2012

2010

Gallatin, TN

-

20

19,432

478

20

19,910

2,761

2010

1997

Germantown, TN

-

3,049

12,456

597

3,049

13,053

2,721

2006

2002

Glendale, CA

7,960

37

18,398

198

37

18,596

3,743

2007

2002

Grand Prairie, TX

-

981

6,086

-

981

6,086

277

2012

2009

Greeley, CO

-

877

6,706

125

877

6,831

1,700

2007

1997

Green Bay, WI

9,017

-

14,891

-

-

14,891

1,429

2010

2002

Green Bay, WI

-

-

20,098

-

-

20,098

1,892

2010

2002

Green Bay, WI

-

-

11,696

-

-

11,696

1,529

2010

2002

Greeneville, TN

-

970

10,032

8

970

10,040

957

2010

2005

Greenwood, IN

-

8,316

26,384

-

8,316

26,384

532

2012

2010

Harker Heights, TX

-

1,907

3,754

-

1,907

3,754

31

2011

2012

High Point, NC

-

2,595

29,013

-

2,595

29,013

260

2012

2010

Houston, TX

-

10,395

-

2

10,388

9

-

2011

Houston, TX

-

5,837

32,986

-

5,837

32,986

1,284

2012

2005

Houston, TX

-

3,688

13,302

-

3,688

13,302

264

2012

2007

Houston, TX

-

12,815

44,717

-

12,815

44,717

827

2012

1998

Houston, TX

14,000

378

31,020

-

378

31,020

1,310

2012

1981

Houston, TX

-

91

11,136

-

91

11,136

612

2012

1986

Hudson, OH

-

2,473

13,622

-

2,473

13,622

-

2012

2006

Jupiter, FL

6,972

2,252

11,415

129

2,252

11,544

2,537

2006

2001

Jupiter, FL

4,336

2,825

5,858

43

2,825

5,901

1,492

2007

2004

Katy, TX

-

1,099

1,604

-

1,099

1,604

57

2012

1986

Kenosha, WI

9,934

-

18,058

-

-

18,058

1,696

2010

1993

Killeen, TX

-

760

22,667

-

760

22,667

1,973

2010

2010

Lafayette, LA

-

1,928

10,483

25

1,928

10,509

2,438

2006

1993

Lake St Louis, MO

-

240

11,937

1,947

240

13,884

1,352

2010

2008

Lakeway, TX

-

2,801

-

-

2,801

-

-

2007

Lakewood, CA

-

146

14,885

1,146

146

16,031

3,110

2006

1993

Lakewood, WA

7,609

72

15,958

-

72

15,958

-

2012

2005

Las Vegas, NV

-

2,319

4,612

916

2,319

5,527

1,207

2006

1991

Las Vegas, NV

2,961

433

6,921

202

433

7,123

1,570

2007

1997

Las Vegas, NV

-

6,127

-

-

6,127

-

-

2007

Las Vegas, NV

-

580

23,420

-

580

23,420

836

2011

2002

Las Vegas , NV

5,803

74

15,287

419

74

15,706

3,637

2006

2000

Lenexa, KS

11,905

540

16,013

2,347

540

18,360

1,459

2010

2008

Lincoln, NE

-

1,420

29,692

9

1,420

29,701

3,671

2010

2003

Los Alamitos, CA

8,085

39

18,635

412

39

19,047

3,858

2007

2003

Los Gatos, CA

-

488

22,386

1,289

488

23,675

5,499

2006

1993

Loxahatchee, FL

-

1,637

5,048

842

1,652

5,875

1,269

2006

1997

Loxahatchee, FL

-

1,340

6,509

57

1,345

6,561

1,511

2006

1993

Loxahatchee, FL

2,600

1,553

4,694

584

1,567

5,264

1,129

2006

1994

Marinette, WI

7,548

-

13,538

-

-

13,538

1,529

2010

2002

Marlton, NJ

-

-

38,300

410

-

38,710

4,400

2008

1994

Mechanicsburg, PA

-

1,350

16,650

-

1,350

16,650

608

2011

1971

Merced, CA

-

-

13,772

927

-

14,699

1,525

2009

2010

Meridian, ID

-

3,600

20,802

251

3,600

21,053

5,365

2006

2008

Merriam, KS

-

176

7,189

220

176

7,409

1,290

2011

1972

Merriam, KS

-

81

3,122

430

81

3,553

259

2011

1980

Merriam, KS

-

336

12,972

-

336

12,972

1,658

2011

1977

Merriam, KS

15,356

182

7,393

93

182

7,486

978

2011

1985

Merrillville, IN

-

-

22,134

210

-

22,344

2,979

2008

2006

Merrillville, IN

-

700

11,699

154

700

11,853

1,484

2007

2008

Mesa, AZ

-

1,558

9,561

378

1,558

9,939

2,503

2008

1989

Mesquite, TX

-

496

3,834

-

496

3,834

18

2012

2012

Middletown, NY

-

1,756

20,364

1,188

1,756

21,552

6,070

2006

1998

Milwaukee, WI

4,429

540

8,457

-

540

8,457

859

2010

1930

Milwaukee, WI

9,762

1,425

11,519

-

1,425

11,520

1,526

2010

1962

Milwaukee, WI

2,442

922

2,185

-

922

2,185

362

2010

1958

Milwaukee, WI

22,383

-

44,535

-

-

44,535

4,091

2010

1983

Monticello, MN

9,522

61

18,489

-

61

18,489

-

2012

2008

Moorestown, NJ

-

-

52,645

-

-

52,645

176

2011

2012

Morrow, GA

-

818

8,064

223

843

8,261

2,025

2007

1990

Mount Juliet, TN

4,456

1,566

11,697

1,038

1,566

12,735

2,741

2007

2005

Mount Vernon, IL

-

-

25,163

-

-

25,163

52

2011

2012

Murrieta, CA

-

-

46,520

484

-

47,004

4,058

2010

2011

Murrieta, CA

-

8,800

202,412

-

8,800

202,412

8,393

2008

2010

Muskego, WI

1,174

964

2,158

-

964

2,159

203

2010

1993

Nashville, TN

-

4,300

-

7,172

11,472

-

-

2010

Nashville , TN

-

1,806

7,165

1,322

1,806

8,487

2,234

2006

1986

New Berlin, WI

4,527

3,739

8,290

-

3,739

8,290

845

2010

1993

Niagara Falls, NY

-

1,145

10,574

228

1,153

10,794

2,797

2007

1995

Niagara Falls, NY

-

388

7,870

47

396

7,909

1,517

2007

2004

Orange Village, OH

-

610

7,419

296

610

7,715

1,898

2007

1985

Oro Valley, AZ

10,011

89

18,339

564

89

18,902

3,770

2007

2004

Oshkosh, WI

-

-

18,339

-

-

18,339

1,709

2010

2000

Oshkosh, WI

9,338

-

15,881

-

-

15,881

1,464

2010

2000

Palm Springs, FL

2,666

739

4,066

72

739

4,137

1,047

2006

1993

Palm Springs, FL

-

1,182

7,765

196

1,182

7,961

1,951

2006

1997

Palm Springs , CA

-

365

12,396

1,366

365

13,762

2,988

2006

1998

Palmer, AK

19,237

217

29,705

745

217

30,450

5,671

2007

2006

Pearland, TX

-

781

5,517

132

781

5,648

1,322

2006

2000

Pearland, TX

1,005

948

4,556

115

948

4,671

1,084

2006

2002

Pewaukee, WI

-

4,700

20,669

-

4,700

20,669

3,825

2007

2007

Phoenix, AZ

27,902

1,149

48,018

10,952

1,149

58,971

11,468

2006

1998

Pineville, NC

-

961

6,974

2,107

1,077

8,965

1,928

2006

1988

Plano, TX

-

5,423

20,752

56

5,423

20,807

5,855

2008

2007

Plano, TX

54,620

793

82,722

-

793

82,722

3,573

2012

2005

Plantation, FL

9,428

8,563

10,666

2,378

8,575

13,033

3,839

2006

1997

Plantation, FL

8,765

8,848

9,262

249

8,896

9,462

4,775

2006

1996

Plymouth, WI

1,370

1,250

1,870

-

1,250

1,870

214

2010

1991

Portland, ME

15,697

655

25,500

412

655

25,912

1,395

2011

2008

Raleigh, NC

-

1,486

11,200

1,762

1,486

12,962

1,064

2011

2007

Redmond, WA

-

5,015

26,697

-

5,015

26,697

2,049

2010

2011

Reno, NV

-

1,117

21,972

676

1,117

22,648

4,960

2006

1991

Richmond, VA

-

2,838

26,305

-

2,838

26,305

-

2012

2008

Rockwall, TX

-

132

17,056

-

132

17,056

735

2012

2008

Rogers, AR

-

1,062

28,680

-

1,062

28,680

1,504

2011

2008

Rolla, MO

-

1,931

47,640

-

1,931

47,639

1,984

2011

2009

Roswell, NM

1,806

183

5,851

-

183

5,851

301

2011

2004

Roswell, NM

5,078

883

15,984

-

883

15,984

680

2011

2006

Roswell, NM

-

762

17,171

-

762

17,171

583

2011

2009

Ruston, LA

-

710

9,790

-

710

9,790

388

2011

1988

Sacramento, CA

-

866

12,756

913

866

13,668

2,764

2006

1990

San Antonio, TX

-

2,050

16,251

2,307

2,050

18,559

5,471

2006

1999

San Antonio, TX

18,400

4,518

29,905

-

4,518

29,905

1,754

2012

1986

San Antonio, TX

-

-

17,303

-

-

17,303

3,735

2007

2007

San Bernardino, CA

-

3,700

14,300

687

3,700

14,987

1,617

2008

1993

San Diego, CA

-

-

22,003

1,845

-

23,848

2,491

2008

1992

Sarasota, FL

-

3,360

19,140

-

3,360

19,140

670

2011

2006

Sarasota, FL

-

62

46,348

-

62

46,348

81

2012

1990

Seattle, WA

-

4,410

35,787

2,055

4,410

37,843

3,140

2010

2010

Sewell, NJ

-

-

53,360

4,355

-

57,715

8,221

2007

2009

Shakopee, MN

6,932

420

11,360

8

420

11,368

1,112

2010

1996

Shakopee, MN

11,743

640

18,089

-

640

18,089

1,252

2010

2007

Sheboygan, WI

1,892

1,012

2,216

-

1,012

2,216

256

2010

1958

Somerville, NJ

-

3,400

22,244

2

3,400

22,246

2,457

2008

2007

Southlake, TX

11,680

592

17,905

-

592

17,905

752

2012

2004

Southlake, TX

18,518

698

30,524

-

698

30,524

998

2012

2004

St. Louis, MO

7,281

336

17,247

939

336

18,186

3,851

2007

2001

St. Paul, MN

26,105

2,681

39,507

-

2,681

39,507

2,594

2011

2007

Stafford, VA

-

-

11,260

313

-

11,573

1,323

2008

2009

Suffern, NY

-

622

35,220

1,985

622

37,204

1,558

2011

2007

Suffolk, VA

-

1,530

10,979

540

1,538

11,511

1,748

2010

2007

Sugar Land, TX

8,905

3,513

15,527

-

3,513

15,527

-

2012

2005

Summit, WI

-

2,899

87,666

-

2,899

87,666

11,954

2008

2009

Tallahassee, FL

-

-

14,719

2,730

-

17,449

1,295

2010

2011

Tampa, FL

-

1,210

19,572

-

1,210

19,572

700

2012

2006

Tampa, FL

-

2,208

6,464

-

2,208

6,464

321

2012

1985

Tampa, FL

-

4,319

12,234

-

4,319

12,234

536

2011

2003

Temple, TX

-

2,900

9,851

-

2,900

9,851

121

2011

2012

Tomball, TX

-

1,404

5,071

880

1,404

5,951

1,721

2006

1982

Tucson, AZ

-

1,302

4,925

662

1,302

5,587

1,377

2008

1995

Tulsa, OK

-

3,003

6,025

20

3,003

6,045

1,955

2006

1992

Van Nuys, CA

-

-

36,187

-

-

36,187

3,281

2009

1991

Virginia Beach, VA

-

827

18,289

237

895

18,458

1,647

2011

2007

Voorhees, NJ

-

6,404

24,251

1,313

6,422

25,546

4,899

2006

1997

Voorhees, NJ

-

-

96,006

-

-

96,006

2,689

2010

2012

Webster, TX

-

360

5,940

8,178

2,418

12,060

3,056

2006

1991

Wellington, FL

6,768

107

16,933

381

107

17,314

3,181

2006

2000

Wellington , FL

6,071

388

13,697

144

388

13,841

2,668

2007

2003

West Allis, WI

3,475

1,106

3,309

-

1,106

3,309

456

2010

1961

West Palm Beach, FL

6,602

628

14,740

121

628

14,861

3,332

2006

1993

West Palm Beach, FL

6,092

610

14,618

116

610

14,734

3,908

2006

1991

West Seneca, NY

12,051

917

22,435

1,759

1,628

23,482

4,871

2007

1990

Westerville, OH

-

2,122

5,403

-

2,122

5,403

14

2012

2001

Zephyrhills, FL

-

3,875

23,907

3,331

3,875

27,237

1,273

2011

1974

Medical facilities total:

$

713,720

$

333,112

$

4,027,512

$

127,413

$

345,938

$

4,142,095

$

456,935

112


Health Care REIT, Inc.

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

Initial Cost to Company

Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period

Description

Encumbrances

Land

Buildings & Improvements

Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition

Land

Buildings & Improvements

Accumulated Depreciation

Year Acquired

Year Built

Assets held for sale:

Brighton, MA

$

-

$

240

$

3,859

$

-

$

-

$

2,449

$

-

2005

1982

Durham, NC

-

5,350

9,320

-

-

2,539

-

2006

1980

Fairhaven, MA

-

770

6,230

-

-

5,552

-

2004

1999

Hamden, CT

-

1,470

4,530

-

-

4,370

-

2002

1998

Hopedale, MA

-

130

8,170

-

-

6,581

-

2005

1999

Lakeway, TX

-

5,484

24,886

-

-

23,716

-

2007

2011

Malabar, FL

-

5,000

12,000

-

-

16,425

-

2010

2008

Melbourne, FL

-

7,000

69,000

-

-

72,694

-

2010

2009

Melbourne, FL

-

1,400

24,400

-

-

24,631

-

2010

2003

Melbourne, FL

-

600

9,400

-

-

9,550

-

2010

1986

Melbourne, FL

-

367

458

-

-

793

-

2011

1979

Midwest City, OK

-

470

5,673

-

-

2,625

-

1998

1958

New Haven, CT

-

160

4,778

-

-

2,520

-

2006

1958

Newburyport, MA

-

960

8,290

-

-

6,784

-

2002

1999

Norwalk, CT

-

410

2,640

-

-

1,764

-

2004

1971

Oklahoma City, OK

-

510

10,694

-

-

9,079

-

1998

1979

Prospect, CT

-

820

1,441

-

-

1,022

-

2004

1970

Quincy, MA

-

2,690

15,410

-

-

14,852

-

2004

1999

Rocky Hill, CT

-

1,460

7,040

-

-

6,205

-

2002

1998

Torrington, CT

-

360

1,261

-

-

1,091

-

2004

1966

Viera, FL

-

1,600

10,600

-

-

11,692

-

2010

1998

Waterbury, CT

-

370

2,166

-

-

518

-

2006

1972

Waterford, CT

-

1,360

12,540

-

-

10,141

-

2002

2000

West Hartford, CT

-

2,650

5,980

-

-

7,144

-

2004

1905

West Haven, CT

-

580

1,620

-

-

476

-

2004

1971

Assets held for sale total

$

-

$

42,211

$

262,386

$

-

$

-

$

245,213

-

(1) Please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding lives used for depreciation and amortization.

(2) Represents real property asset associated with a capital lease.

113


Initial Cost to Company

Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period

Segment

Encumbrances

Land

Buildings & Improvements

Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition

Land

Buildings & Improvements

Accumulated Depreciation

Seniors housing triple-net

$

218,741

$

623,120

$

7,462,660

$

341,850

$

625,388

$

7,802,238

$

707,213

Seniors housing operating

1,369,526

388,015

4,239,499

131,030

394,065

4,364,478

390,907

Medical facilities

713,720

333,112

4,027,512

127,413

345,938

4,142,095

456,935

Construction in progress

-

-

162,984

-

-

162,984

-

Total continuing operating properties

2,301,987

1,344,247

15,892,655

600,293

1,365,391

16,471,795

1,555,055

Assets held for sale

-

42,210

262,386

-

-

245,213

-

Total investments in real property owned

$

2,301,987

$

1,386,457

$

16,155,041

$

600,293

$

1,365,391

$

16,717,008

$

1,555,055

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Reconciliation of real property:

(in thousands)

Investment in real estate:

Balance at beginning of year

$

14,844,319

$

8,992,495

$

6,336,291

Additions:

Acquisitions

2,923,251

4,525,737

1,707,421

Improvements

449,964

426,000

398,510

Conversions from loans receivable

-

-

10,070

Assumed other items, net

108,404

210,411

208,314

Assumed debt

481,598

961,928

559,508

Foreign currency translation

6,082

-

-

Total additions

3,969,299

6,124,076

2,883,823

Deductions:

Cost of real estate sold

(581,696)

(250,047)

(216,300)

Reclassification of accumulated depreciation and amortization for assets held for sale

(120,236)

(10,011)

(10,372)

Impairment of assets

(29,287)

(12,194)

(947)

Total deductions

(731,219)

(272,252)

(227,619)

Balance at end of year (3)

$

18,082,399

$

14,844,319

$

8,992,495

Accumulated depreciation:

Balance at beginning of year

$

1,194,476

$

836,966

$

677,851

Additions:

Depreciation and amortization expenses

533,585

423,605

202,543

Amortization of above market leases

7,204

6,409

2,524

Total additions

540,789

430,014

205,067

Deductions:

Sale of properties

(59,974)

(63,997)

(31,919)

Reclassification of accumulated depreciation and amortization for assets held for sale

(120,236)

(8,507)

(14,033)

Total deductions

(180,210)

(72,504)

(45,952)

Balance at end of year

$

1,555,055

$

1,194,476

$

836,966

(3) The aggregate cost for tax purposes for real property equals $14,788,080,000, $13,604,448,000 and $8,802,656,000 at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

114


Health Care REIT, Inc.

Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

December 31, 2012

(in thousands)

Description

Interest Rate

Final Maturity Date

Monthly Payment Terms

Prior Liens

Face Amount of Mortgages

Carrying Amount of Mortgages

Principal Amount of Loans Subject to Delinquent Principal or Interest

First mortgage relating to one medical office building in  Texas

6.18%

12/31/17

$114,643

$

-

$

22,244

$

22,244

$

-

First mortgage relating to one hospital in California

8.72%

12/01/17

$127,158

-

17,500

17,500

-

First mortgage relating to one medical office building in  Texas

6.18%

12/31/17

$82,941

-

16,093

16,093

-

First mortgage relating to one hospital in California

10.14%

06/01/20

$160,435

-

21,050

15,187

-

First mortgage relating to one medical office building in Georgia

6.50%

10/01/14

$38,556

-

6,100

6,014

-

Second mortgage relating to one senior housing facility in New Hampshire

8.11%

10/01/16

$21,056

17,670

3,235

3,056

-

First mortgage relating to one senior housing facility in Arizona

3.55%

01/01/14

$12,275

-

4,500

2,650

2,650

First mortgage relating to one senior housing facility in Texas

10.25%

03/01/13

$56,307

-

2,635

2,498

-

Second mortgage relating to one hospital in California

9.83%

10/31/13

$138,308

15,187

13,000

1,323

-

First mortgage relating to one hospital in California

10.13%

01/14/14

$131,481

-

8,045

1,215

-

First mortgage relating to one medical office building in Georgia

8.11%

10/01/14

$1,206

-

800

175

-

Totals

$

32,857

$

115,202

$

87,955

$

2,650

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Reconciliation of mortgage loans:

(in thousands)

Balance at beginning of year

$

63,934

$

109,283

$

74,517

Additions:

New mortgage loans

40,641

11,286

73,439

Total additions

40,641

11,286

73,439

Deductions:

Collections of principal

(11,819)

(50,579)

(10,540)

Conversions to real property

(3,300)

(4,000)

(10,070)

Charge-offs

(1,501)

-

(18,063)

Reclass to other real estate loans

-

(2,056)

-

Total deductions

(16,620)

(56,635)

(38,673)

Balance at end of year

$

87,955

$

63,934

$

109,283

115


EXHIBIT INDEX

1.1(a)     Form of Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2010, entered into by and between the Company and each of UBS Securities LLC, RBS Securities Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 15, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

1.1(b)     Form of Amendment No. 1, dated September 1, 2011, to the Equity Distribution Agreements entered into by and between the Company and each of UBS Securities LLC, RBS Securities Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 8, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

2.1          Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 21, 2012, by and among Sunrise Senior Living, Inc., Brewer Holdco, Inc., Brewer Holdco Sub, Inc., the Company and Red Fox, Inc. (the exhibits and schedules to the Agreement and Plan of Merger have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K) (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 22, 2012 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(a)     Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(b)     Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A, of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(c)      Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(d)     Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 13, 2003 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(e)      Certificate of Designation of 7 7/8% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A/A filed July 8, 2003 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(f)      Certificate of Designation of 7 5/8% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed September 10, 2004 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(g)      Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.9 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2007 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(h)     Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and of Registered Agent of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(i)       Certificate of Designation of 6% Series H Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

116


3.1(j)      Certificate of Designation of 6.50% Series I Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 7, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(k)     Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 10, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.1(l)       Certificate of Designation of 6.50% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 8, 2012 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

3.2          Fourth Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 1, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(a)     Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 9, 2002 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(b)     Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of September 6, 2002, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 9, 2002 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(c)      Amendment No. 1, dated March 12, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of September 6, 2002, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 14, 2003 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(d)     Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 10, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(e)      Amendment No. 1, dated September 16, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 10, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(f)      Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of October 29, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 30, 2003 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(g)      Amendment No. 1, dated September 13, 2004, to Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of October 29, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor to Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 13, 2004 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(h)     Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of April 27, 2005, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 28, 2005 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.1(i)       Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of November 30, 2005, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2005 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

117


4.2(a)     Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2006, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 20, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.2(b)     Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of November 20, 2006, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 20, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.2(c)      Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of July 20, 2007, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 20, 2007 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(a)     Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 15, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(b)     Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of March 15, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 15, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(c)      Amendment No. 1 to Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of June 18, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 18, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(d)     Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of April 7, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 7, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(e)      Amendment No. 1 to Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of June 8, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 8, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(f)      Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of September 10, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 13, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(g)      Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of November 16, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 16, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(h)     Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of March 14, 2011, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 14, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(i)       Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of April 3, 2012, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 4, 2012 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.3(j)      Supplemental Indenture No. 7, dated as of December 6, 2012, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 11, 2012 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

4.4          Form of Indenture for Senior Subordinated Debt Securities (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Form S-3 (File No. 333-73936) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

118


4.5          Form of Indenture for Junior Subordinated Debt Securities (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Form S-3 (File No. 333-73936) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

10.1        Fifth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2011, by and among the Company, the banks signatory thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., as a joint lead arranger, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as a joint lead arranger and documentation agent, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 2, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

10.2        Credit Agreement dated as of January 7, 2013, by and among the Company, the lenders listed therein, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, LC issuer and a swingline lender, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., as documentation agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as joint lead arrangers, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as joint book managers (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 11, 2013 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

10.3        Term Loan Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2012, by and among the Company, the banks signatory thereto, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents, Citibank, N.A., Compass Bank, Fifth Third Bank, PNC Bank, National Association, The Bank of New York Mellon and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as co-documentation agents, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and RBC Capital Markets, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 30, 2012 (File No. No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

10.4        Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2011, by and among the Company, FC-GEN Investment, LLC and FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

10.5(a)   The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Appendix II to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed September 29, 1995 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.5(b)   First Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-40771) filed November 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.5(c)   Second Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-73916) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.5(d)   Third Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.5(e)   Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executive Officers under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 16, 2005 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.6(a)   Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2004 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.6(b)   First Amendment to the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Health Care REIT, Inc. effective April 21, 1998 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2004 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

119


10.6(c)   Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A filed October 27, 2004 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(a)   Amended and Restated Health Care REIT, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed March 25, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(b)   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(c)   Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreements (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(d)   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(e)   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(f)    Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreements (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(g)   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(h)   Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(i)    Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(j)    Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(k)   Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(l)    Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

120


10.7(m)  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(n)   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the Chief Executive Officer under the Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(o)   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers under the Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(p)   Form of Deferred Stock Unit Grant Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(q)   Form of Amendment to Deferred Stock Unit Grant Agreements for Non-Employee Directors under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(r)    Form of Deferred Stock Unit Grant Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.7(s)    Form of Deferred Stock Unit Grant Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.8(a)   Fifth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 2, 2010, by and between the Company and George L. Chapman (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 8, 2010 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.8(b)   Letter Agreement, dated February 4, 2013, by and between the Company and George L. Chapman.*

10.9        Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 29, 2008, between the Company and Scott A. Estes (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.10      Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 29, 2008, between the Company and Charles J. Herman, Jr. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.11      Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 29, 2008, between the Company and Jeffrey H. Miller (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.12(a) Employment Agreement, dated January 19, 2009, between the Company and John T. Thomas (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.12(b) Separation Agreement and General Release, dated July 25, 2012, between the Company and John T. Thomas (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2012 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

121


10.13      Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 29, 2008, between the Company and Erin C. Ibele (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.14      Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 29, 2008, between the Company and Daniel R. Loftus (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.15      Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, dated December 29, 2008, between the Company and Frederick L. Farrar (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.16      Amended and Restated Health Care REIT, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 29, 2008 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 5, 2009 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.17      Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each director, executive officer and officer of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

10.18      Summary of Director Compensation (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed November 7, 2012 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

12           Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends (Unaudited).

14           Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004 (File No. 001-08923), and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

21           Subsidiaries of the Company.

23           Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.

24.1        Power of Attorney executed by William C. Ballard, Jr. (Director).

24.2        Power of Attorney executed by Judith C. Pelham (Director).

24.3        Power of Attorney executed by R. Scott Trumbull (Director).

24.4        Power of Attorney executed by Thomas J. DeRosa (Director).

24.5        Power of Attorney executed by Jeffrey H. Donahue (Director).

24.6        Power of Attorney executed by Peter J. Grua (Director).

24.7        Power of Attorney executed by Fred S. Klipsch (Director).

24.8        Power of Attorney executed by Sharon M. Oster (Director).

24.9        Power of Attorney executed by Jeffrey R. Otten (Director).

24.10      Power of Attorney executed by George L. Chapman (Director, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Principal Executive Officer).

24.11      Power of Attorney executed by Scott A. Estes (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer).

122


24.12      Power of Attorney executed by Paul D. Nungester, Jr. (Senior Vice President and Controller and Principal Accounting Officer).

31.1        Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2        Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

32.1        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Executive Officer.

32.2        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Financial Officer.

101.INS     XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**

101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**

101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**

101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**

*

Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.

**

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, (vi) Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and (vii) Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate.

123


TABLE OF CONTENTS