These terms and conditions govern your use of the website alphaminr.com and its related services.
These Terms and Conditions (“Terms”) are a binding contract between you and Alphaminr, (“Alphaminr”, “we”, “us” and “service”). You must agree to and accept the Terms. These Terms include the provisions in this document as well as those in the Privacy Policy. These terms may be modified at any time.
Your subscription will be on a month to month basis and automatically renew every month. You may terminate your subscription at any time through your account.
We will provide you with advance notice of any change in fees.
You represent that you are of legal age to form a binding contract. You are responsible for any
activity associated with your account. The account can be logged in at only one computer at a
time.
The Services are intended for your own individual use. You shall only use the Services in a
manner that complies with all laws. You may not use any automated software, spider or system to
scrape data from Alphaminr.
Alphaminr is not a financial advisor and does not provide financial advice of any kind. The service is provided “As is”. The materials and information accessible through the Service are solely for informational purposes. While we strive to provide good information and data, we make no guarantee or warranty as to its accuracy.
TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL ALPHAMINR BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR INVESTMENT LOSSES, LOSS OF DATA, OR ACCURACY OF DATA, OR FOR ANY AMOUNT, IN THE AGGREGATE, IN EXCESS OF THE GREATER OF (1) FIFTY DOLLARS OR (2) THE AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU TO ALPHAMINR IN THE SIX MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THIS APPLICABLE CLAIM. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL OR CERTAIN OTHER DAMAGES, SO THE ABOVE LIMITATION AND EXCLUSIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
If any provision of these Terms is found to be invalid under any applicable law, such provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions herein.
This privacy policy describes how we (“Alphaminr”) collect, use, share and protect your personal information when we provide our service (“Service”). This Privacy Policy explains how information is collected about you either directly or indirectly. By using our service, you acknowledge the terms of this Privacy Notice. If you do not agree to the terms of this Privacy Policy, please do not use our Service. You should contact us if you have questions about it. We may modify this Privacy Policy periodically.
When you register for our Service, we collect information from you such as your name, email address and credit card information.
Like many other websites we use “cookies”, which are small text files that are stored on your computer or other device that record your preferences and actions, including how you use the website. You can set your browser or device to refuse all cookies or to alert you when a cookie is being sent. If you delete your cookies, if you opt-out from cookies, some Services may not function properly. We collect information when you use our Service. This includes which pages you visit.
We use Google Analytics and we use Stripe for payment processing. We will not share the information we collect with third parties for promotional purposes. We may share personal information with law enforcement as required or permitted by law.
|
Ety Sabach
Chief Financial Officer
4 Nahal Harif St. Norther Industrial Zone,
Yavne 81106, Israel
Tel: 972-8-932-1000
|
|
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Registrant's Contact Person)
|
|
Title of class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares, NIS 0.10 par value per share
|
Nasdaq Capital Market
|
|
|
|
| Large Accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer x |
|
U.S. GAAP
o
International Financing Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board
x
Other
o
|
|
Page
|
| PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION | 1 | |
| PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND SHARE INFORMATION | 1 | |
| CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | 1 | |
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
||
|
2
|
||
|
2
|
||
|
16
|
||
|
33
|
||
|
33
|
||
|
51
|
||
|
61
|
||
|
64
|
||
|
69
|
||
|
70
|
||
|
82
|
||
|
83
|
||
|
|
87
|
|
|
84
|
||
|
84
|
||
|
84
|
||
| 84 | ||
|
85
|
||
| AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT |
85
|
|
| CODE OF ETHICS |
85
|
|
|
86
|
||
|
86
|
||
|
86
|
||
|
87
|
||
|
87
|
||
|
|
88
|
|
| 88 | ||
| 88 | ||
| 89 |
|
●
|
changes affecting currency exchange rates, including the NIS/U.S. Dollar exchange rate;
|
|
●
|
payment default by, or loss of, one or more of our principal clients;
|
|
●
|
the loss of one or more of our key personnel;
|
|
●
|
termination of arrangements with our suppliers, and in particular Arla Foods amba;
|
|
●
|
increasing levels of competition in Israel and other markets in which we do business;
|
|
●
|
increase or decrease in global purchase prices of food products;
|
|
●
|
our inability to accurately predict consumption of our products;
|
|
●
|
we may not successfully integrate our prior acquisitions;
|
|
●
|
our inability to anticipate changes in consumer preferences;
|
|
●
|
product liability claims and other litigation matters;
|
|
●
|
interruption to our storage facilities;
|
|
●
|
our insurance coverage may not be sufficient;
|
|
●
|
our operating results may be subject to variations from quarter to quarter;
|
|
●
|
our inability to successfully compete with nationally branded products;
|
|
●
|
our inability to protect our intellectual property rights;
|
|
●
|
our inability to meet the Nasdaq listing requirements;
|
|
●
|
significant concentration of our shares are held by one shareholder;
|
|
●
|
our management could lose a major amount of its indirect ownership of our common stock through litigation;
|
|
●
|
we are controlled by and have business relations with Willi-Food and its management;
|
|
●
|
The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile;
|
|
●
|
our inability to maintain an effective system of internal controls;
|
|
●
|
all of our assets are pledged to creditors;
|
|
●
|
changes in laws and regulations, including those relating to the food distribution industry, and inability to meet and maintain regulatory qualifications and approvals for our products;
|
|
●
|
economic conditions in Israel;
|
|
●
|
changes in political, economic and military conditions in Israel, including, in particular, economic conditions in the Company’s core markets;
|
|
●
|
difficulties in acquiring jurisdiction and enforcement liabilities against our officers and directors who are based in Israel; and
|
|
●
|
our international operations may be adversely affected by risks associated with international business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Assets and liabilities measured by fair value: financial assets measured by fair value recorded directly as profit or loss.
|
|
|
●
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
|
|
|
●
|
Property, plant and equipment and intangibles assets are presented at the lower of the cost less accumulated amortizations and the recoverable amount.
|
|
|
●
|
Liabilities to employees as described in note 2U to our consolidated annual financial statements.
|
| High | Low | |||||||
|
December 2009
|
3.815 | 3.772 | ||||||
|
January 2010
|
3.765 | 3.667 | ||||||
|
February 2010
|
3.796 | 3.704 | ||||||
|
March 2010
|
3.787 | 3.713 | ||||||
|
April 2010
|
3.749 | 3.682 | ||||||
|
May 2010
|
3.870 | 3.730 | ||||||
|
June 2010 (through June 21, 2010)
|
3.884 | 3.814 |
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
In accordance with IFRS
|
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
USD
|
NIS
|
USD
|
NIS
|
USD
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
303,460 | 80,387 | 289,068 | 76,574 | 201,617 | 53,408 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
219,569 | 58,164 | 228,839 | 60,619 | 156,062 | 41,341 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
83,891 | 22,223 | 60,229 | 15,955 | 45,555 | 12,067 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Selling expenses
|
35,598 | 9,430 | 31,800 | 8,424 | 20,602 | 5,457 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
20,451 | 5,417 | 16,863 | 4,467 | 12,280 | 3,253 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other (Income) expenses
|
(5,330 | ) | (1,411 | ) | 1,846 | 489 | (454 | ) | (120 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
50,719 | 13,436 | 50,509 | 13,380 | 32,428 | 8,590 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating profit
|
33,172 | 8,787 | 9,720 | 2,575 | 13,127 | 3,477 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Finance income
|
2,744 | 727 | (4,167 | ) | (1,104 | ) | 2,111 | 559 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Finance expense
|
1,273 | 337 | 673 | 178 | (323 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Finance income (expense), net
|
1,471 | 390 | (4,840 | ) | (1,282 | ) | 2,434 | 645 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Profit before taxes on income
|
34,643 | 9,177 | 4,880 | 1,293 | 15,561 | 4,122 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Taxes on income
|
5,043 | 1,336 | 1,117 | 296 | 2,174 | 576 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Profit from continuing operations
|
29,600 | 7,841 | 3,763 | 997 | 13,387 | 3,546 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Profit (loss) from discontinued operations
|
1,928 | 511 | (3,496 | ) | (926 | ) | (8,748 | ) | (2,317 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year
|
31,528 | 8,352 | 267 | 71 | 4,639 | 1,229 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Attributable to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owners of the Company
|
30,436 | 8,063 | (786 | ) | (208 | ) | 2,342 | 620 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
1,092 | 289 | 1,053 | 279 | 2,297 | 609 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
31,528 | 8,352 | 267 | 71 | 4,639 | 1,229 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per Share from continuing operations
|
2.81 | 0.75 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 1.14 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per Share from discontinued operations
|
0.15 | 0.04 | (0.38 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.91 | ) | (0.24 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per Share
|
2.96 | 0.79 | (0.08 | ) | (0.02 | ) | 0.23 | (0.06 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Shares Used in Computing Earnings per Share
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividend declared per share
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP
|
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
USD
|
NIS
|
USD
|
|||||||||||||
|
Sales
|
191,460 | 50,718 | 166,282 | 44,048 | ||||||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
143,581 | 38,035 | 128,215 | 33,964 | ||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
47,879 | 12,683 | 38,067 | 10,084 | ||||||||||||
|
Sales and Marketing
|
21,100 | 5,589 | 15,771 | 4,178 | ||||||||||||
|
General and administrative
|
14,151 | 3,749 | 13,544 | 3,588 | ||||||||||||
|
Total Operating expenses
|
35,251 | 9,338 | 29,315 | 7,766 | ||||||||||||
|
Operating Income
|
12,628 | 3,345 | 8,752 | 2,318 | ||||||||||||
|
Financial Income, Net
|
4,925 | 1,305 | 2,501 | 663 | ||||||||||||
|
Other Income, Net
|
18,248 | 4,834 | 35 | 9 | ||||||||||||
|
Pre Tax Income
|
35,801 | 9,484 | 11,288 | 2,990 | ||||||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
5,379 | 1,425 | 3,567 | 945 | ||||||||||||
|
Income after taxes on income
|
30,422 | 8,059 | 7,721 | 2,045 | ||||||||||||
|
Minority interest
|
1,807 | 479 | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
Net Income
|
28,615 | 7,580 | 7,721 | 2,045 | ||||||||||||
|
Earnings per Share Basic
|
3.17 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||
|
Shares Used in Computing Earnings per Share
|
9,028,223 | 9,028,223 | 8,615,000 | 8,615,000 | ||||||||||||
|
Dividend declared per share
|
- | - | 0.55 | 0.15 | ||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
USD
|
NIS
|
USD
|
NIS
|
USD
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Working capital
|
148,359 | 39,299 | 122,396 | 32,423 | 142,645 | 37,787 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
282,719 | 74,893 | 273,342 | 72,408 | 239,452 | 63,431 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term bank debt
|
10,372 | 2,748 | 17,562 | 4,652 | 5,978 | 1,584 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders' equity
|
206,480 | 54,696 | 185,582 | 49,161 | 190,607 | 50,492 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital stock
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
USD
|
NIS
|
USD
|
|||||||||||||
|
Working capital
|
144,323 | 38,231 | 85,419 | 22,628 | ||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
219,971 | 58,270 | 137,274 | 36,364 | ||||||||||||
|
Short-term bank debt
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
|
Shareholders' equity
|
171,739 | 45,494 | 101,867 | 26,985 | ||||||||||||
|
Capital stock
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 8,615,000 | 8,615,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
●
|
varying regulatory restrictions on sales of our products to certain markets and unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
●
|
tariffs, customs, duties, quotas and other trade barriers;
|
|
|
●
|
difficulties in managing foreign operations and foreign distribution partners;
|
|
|
●
|
longer payment cycles and problems in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
●
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
●
|
political risks;
|
|
|
●
|
foreign exchange controls which may restrict or prohibit repatriation of funds;
|
|
|
●
|
export and import restrictions or prohibitions, and delays from customs brokers or government agencies;
|
|
|
●
|
seasonal reductions in business activity in certain parts of the world; and
|
|
|
●
|
potentially adverse tax consequences.
|
|
|
|
A.
|
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
|
|
B.
|
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
|
|
|
●
|
to promote the “Willi-Food” and "Shamir Salads" brand names and to increase market penetration of products that are currently sold through, among other things, marketing efforts and advertising campaigns;
|
|
|
●
|
to expand its current food product lines and diversify into additional product lines, as well as to respond to market demand; and
|
|
|
●
|
to expand the Company's activity in the international food markets, mainly in the U.S. and Europe.
|
|
|
●
|
to continue to locate, develop and distribute additional food products, some of which may be new to Israeli consumers;
|
|
|
●
|
to increase its inventory levels from time to time both to achieve economies of scale on its purchases from suppliers and to more fully meet its customers’ demands;
|
|
|
●
|
to further expand the international food markets, mainly in the U.S. and Europe, by purchasing additional food distribution companies and/or increasing cooperation with local existing distributors and/or exporting products directly to the customer; and
|
|
|
●
|
to penetrate new markets within the Middle East through the establishment of business relationships and cooperation with representatives in such markets subject to a positive political climate.
|
|
|
●
|
promoted the value of the “Willi-Food” brand and introduced additional food products to the Israeli marketplace under the brand name “Willi-Food”;
|
|
|
●
|
initiated sales in the U.S. and Europe; and
|
|
|
●
|
entered into arrangements with recognized manufacturers to market their products under their respective brand names, in addition to brand names under which the Company currently markets its products.
|
|
|
●
|
Canned Vegetables and Pickles: including okra, mushrooms (whole and sliced) and terfess, artichoke (hearts and bottoms), beans, asparagus, capers, corn kernels, baby corn, palm hearts, bamboo shoots, vine leaves (including vine leaves stuffed with rice), sour pickles, mixed pickled vegetables, pickled peppers, an assortment of black and green olives, sun dried tomatoes and edamame soybeans. These products are primarily imported from China, Spain, Greece, Thailand, South America, Turkey, France, India, Poland, Morocco and The Netherlands.
|
|
|
●
|
Canned Fish: including tuna (in oil or in water), sardines, anchovies, smoked and pressed cod liver, herring, fish paste and salmon. These products are primarily imported from the Philippines, Thailand, Portugal, Canada, Spain, Greece and Sweden.
|
|
|
●
|
Canned Fruit: including pineapple (sliced or pieces), peaches, apricot, pears, cherries, mangos, litchis and fruit cocktail. These products are primarily imported from the Philippines, Thailand, Greece and Europe.
|
|
|
●
|
Edible Oils: including olive oil, sunflower oil, soybean oil, corn oil and rapeseed oil. These products are primarily imported from Belgium, Argentina, Turkey, Italy and Spain.
|
|
|
●
|
Dairy and Dairy Substitute Products: including hard and semi-hard cheeses (parmesan, edam, kashkaval and emmental), molded cheeses (brie, camembert and danablu)
,
feta, Bulgarian cheese, butter, butter spreads, margarine, melted cheese, cheese alternatives, condensed milk and others. These products are primarily imported from Greece, Denmark, Bulgaria, Italy, The Netherlands and the United States.
|
|
|
●
|
Dried Fruit, Nuts and Beans: including figs, apricots, prunes, papaya, pineapple, sunflower seeds, walnuts, pine nuts, cashew nuts and peanuts. These products are primarily imported from Greece, Turkey, India, China, Thailand and the United States.
|
|
|
●
|
Other Products: including, among others, instant noodle soups, coffee creamers, lemon juice, halva, Turkish delight, cookies, vinegar, sweet pastry and crackers, sauces, corn flour, pastes, rice, rice sticks, pasta, spaghetti and noodles, breakfast cereals, corn flakes, instant coffee, rusks, coconut milk, and ouzo. These products are primarily imported from The Netherlands, Germany, Romania, Italy, Greece, Belgium, the United States, Scandinavia, China, Thailand, Turkey, India, and South America (including Argentina).
|
|
Supplier
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Arla
|
*
|
12%
|
|
|
●
|
large retail supermarket chains in the organized market, and
|
|
|
●
|
private supermarket chains, mini-markets, wholesalers, manufactures, institutional customers and the customers in the Palestinian Authority referred herein as the
"private sector"
.
|
|
Percentage of Total Sales
Year Ended December 31
|
||||||||
|
Customer Groups
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
|
Supermarket Chains in the organized market
|
28 | % | 23 | % | ||||
|
Private Supermarket Chains, mini-markets, wholesalers, manufacturers, institutional consumers and the customers in the Palestinian Authority
|
72 | % | 77 | % | ||||
| 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||
|
C.
|
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
|
|
Subsidiary
|
Jurisdiction of Organization
|
Company's Ownership Interest
|
|
Gold Frost
|
Israel
|
100%
|
|
W.F.D.
|
Israel
|
100%
|
|
Shamir
|
Israel
|
51.0%
|
|
D.
|
PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Revenue Recognition
– Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Management estimates are required to determine the amounts to be reduced for estimated customer returns, rebates and other credits.
|
|
2.
|
Inventories
– Inventories are assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production for such sale or in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services.
|
|
|
We value our
inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
|
|
|
Cost is determined as follows:
|
|
Raw material, components and packaging
|
-
|
by the "first-in, first-out" method
|
|
Processing goods
|
-
|
cost of materials plus labor
|
|
finished products
|
-
|
on the basis of standard cost which approximates actual production cost (materials, labor and indirect manufacturing costs)
|
|
Products
|
-
|
weighted average method
|
|
|
The Company's management is required to make certain judgments and estimates that may significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost as well as the amount of gross profit recognized. Judgments made include recording markdowns used to sell through inventory and shrinkage. When management determines the salability of inventory has decreased, markdowns for clearance activity and the related cost impact are recorded at the time the price change decision is made. Factors considered in the determination of markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences and age of merchandise.
|
|
3.
|
Useful lives of property, plant and equipment
- the management of the Company reviews the estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment at the end of each annual reporting period in order to determine the amount of depreciation expense to be recorded. The useful life of an asset is estimated at the time the asset is acquired based on historical experience, the expected usage, wear and tear of the asset. Changes in industry conditions may cause the estimated period of use or the value of these assets to change. We perform periodic reviews to confirm the appropriateness of estimated economic useful lives for each class of fixed assets. These factors could cause management to conclude that impairment indicators exist and require that impairment tests be performed, which could result in management determining that the value of long-lived assets is impaired, resulting in a write-down of the long-lived assets. For the two years ended December 31, 2009, no changes in assets useful lives were recorded.
|
|
4.
|
Impairment of goodwill
-
Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the value of the goodwill may be impaired. This evaluation requires management to make judgments relating to future cash flows, growth rates, and economic and market conditions. These evaluations are based on determining the fair value of a cash generating unit using a valuation method discounted cash flow or a relative. During 2009, management of the Company assessed the recoverability of goodwill and determined that there was no need of impairment in goodwill associated with any of the Company's cash-generating units. During 2008 and 2007, management of the Company assessed the recoverability of goodwill and determined that goodwill associated with the Company's overseas marketing of refrigerated products activity (Kirkeby) and with the Company's export activity (WF) was not recoverable and was written off in the amount of NIS 1,067 thousands (USD 283 thousands) and NIS 3,054 thousands (USD 809 thousands), respectively. The primary factor leading to the decisions that goodwill was not recoverable in both subsidiaries was the substantial adverse difference between management's expectations regarding results of operation as predicted at the purchase deliberations and the actual amounts. The operations of both entities were eventually discontinued as part of the discontinuation of the export segment.
|
|
5.
|
Deferred taxes
- Deferred tax is provided for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realization or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized. We recognize a deferred tax asset in our balance sheet only where we determine that it is probable that it will be recovered. A portion of the deferred tax asset recorded in our balance sheet relates to current or prior period tax losses where management considers that it is more likely than not that we will recover the benefit of those tax losses in future periods through the generation of sufficient future taxable profits. Our assumptions in relation to the generation of sufficient future taxable profits depend on our estimates of future taxable profits from the Company's regular course of business. These estimates are subject to risk and uncertainty, hence there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will alter the projections, which may impact the recoverability of the deferred tax asset recorded in our balance sheet and those tax losses currently provided as not recoverable. In such circumstances, some or all of the carrying value of the deferred tax asset may require provisioning, and we would charge the expense to the profit and loss account, and conversely, some or all of the amounts provided as not recoverable may be reversed and we would credit the benefit to the profit and loss account.
|
|
6.
|
Severance pay
- The current value of the Company's obligation in respect of severance pay is based on actuarial assumptions, including discount rate (which is based on the discount rate of government bonds) market conditions, .etc. The actuarial assumptions are based on the information provided by the management of the Company regarding expected rate of termination, employees insurance policies payments and probability for compensation payments. Any change of the assumptions given by the management of the Company may change the book value of the Company's obligation in respect of severance pay and could affect our future results of operations.
|
|
A.
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2009
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2008
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
|
Cost of Sales
|
72.36 | % | 79.17 | % | 77.41 | % | ||||||
|
Gross Profit
|
27.64 | % | 20.83 | % | 22.59 | % | ||||||
|
Selling Expenses
|
11.73 | % | 11.00 | % | 10.22 | % | ||||||
|
General and Administrative Expenses
|
6.74 | % | 5.83 | % | 6.09 | % | ||||||
|
Other (Income) expense
|
(1.76 | )% | 0.64 | % | (0.23 | )% | ||||||
|
Operating profit
|
10.93 | % | 3.36 | % | 6.51 | % | ||||||
|
Financial Income (expenses), Net
|
0.48 | % | (1.67 | )% | 1.21 | % | ||||||
|
Profit before taxes on income
|
11.41 | % | 1.69 | % | 7.72 | % | ||||||
|
Taxes on income
|
1.66 | % | 0.39 | % | 1.08 | % | ||||||
|
Profit from continuing operations
|
9.75 | % | 1.30 | % | 6.64 | % | ||||||
|
Profit (loss) from discontinued operations
|
0.64 | % | (1.21 | )% | (4.34 | )% | ||||||
|
Profit for the year
|
10.39 | % | 0.09 | % | 2.30 | % | ||||||
|
Attributable to:
|
||||||||||||
|
Owners of the Company
|
10.03 | % | (0.27 | )% | 1.16 | % | ||||||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
0.36 | % | 0.36 | % | 1.14 | % | ||||||
|
Net Income
|
10.39 | % | 0.09 | % | 2.30 | % | ||||||
|
B.
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
|
C.
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES
|
|
D.
|
TREND INFORMATION
|
|
E.
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
|
|
F.
|
TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTURAL OBLIGATIONS
|
|
Payments due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Open purchase orders
|
NIS 21,247
(USD 5,628)
|
NIS 21,247
(USD 5,628)
|
-- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
|
Loans from banks (*)
|
NIS 10,192
(USD 2,700)
|
NIS 10,095
(USD 2,674)
|
NIS 97
(USD 26)
|
-- | -- | |||||||||||
|
Lease agreements (**)
|
NIS 277
(USD 73)
|
NIS 277
(USD 73)
|
-- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
|
Total
|
NIS 31,716
(USD 8,401)
|
NIS 31,619
(USD 8,375)
|
NIS 97
(USD 26)
|
-- | -- | |||||||||||
|
G.
|
SAFE HARBOR
|
|
●
|
changes affecting currency exchange rates, including the NIS/U.S. Dollar exchange rate;
|
|
●
|
payment default by, or loss of, one or more of our principal clients;
|
|
●
|
the loss of one or more of our key personnel;
|
|
●
|
termination of arrangements with our suppliers, and in particular Arla Foods amba;
|
|
●
|
increasing levels of competition in Israel and other markets in which we do business;
|
|
●
|
increase or decrease in global purchase prices of food products;
|
|
●
|
our inability to accurately predict consumption of our products;
|
|
●
|
we may not successfully integrate our prior acquisitions;
|
|
●
|
our inability to anticipate changes in consumer preferences;
|
|
●
|
product liability claims and other litigation matters;
|
|
●
|
interruption to our storage facilities;
|
|
●
|
our insurance coverage may not be sufficient;
|
|
●
|
our operating results may be subject to variations from quarter to quarter;
|
|
●
|
our inability to successfully compete with nationally branded products;
|
|
●
|
our inability to protect our intellectual property rights;
|
|
●
|
our inability to meet the Nasdaq listing requirements;
|
|
●
|
significant concentration of our shares are held by one shareholder;
|
|
●
|
our management could lose a major amount of its indirect ownership of our common stock through litigation;
|
|
●
|
we are controlled by and have business relations with Willi-Food and its management;
|
|
●
|
The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile;
|
|
●
|
our inability to maintain an effective system of internal controls;
|
|
●
|
all of our assets are pledged to creditors;
|
|
●
|
changes in laws and regulations, including those relating to the food distribution industry, and inability to meet and maintain regulatory qualifications and approvals for our products;
|
|
●
|
economic conditions in Israel;
|
|
●
|
changes in political, economic and military conditions in Israel, including, in particular, economic conditions in the Company’s core markets;
|
|
●
|
difficulties in acquiring jurisdiction and enforcement liabilities against our officers and directors who are based in Israel; and,
|
|
●
|
our international operations may be adversely affected by risks associated with international business.
|
|
|
|
A.
|
DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position with the Company
|
|
|
Joseph Williger
|
53
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
Zwi Williger
|
55
|
Chief Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
Rachel Bar-Ilan (1)
|
52
|
Director
|
|
|
Ariel Herzfeld (1)
|
55
|
External Director
|
|
|
Etti Cohen (1)
|
41
|
External Director
|
|
|
Gil Hochboim
|
40
|
Vice President
|
|
|
Ety Sabach
|
37
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(1)
|
Members of the Company’s Audit Committee.
|
||
|
B.
|
COMPENSATION
|
|
|
(1)
|
The term of the Management Services Agreements were extended indefinitely, subject to clauses (2), (5) and (6) below.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Each of the parties to the Management Services Agreements may terminate the agreement at any time, and for any reason, by prior written notice, which will be delivered to the other party as follows:
|
|
|
●
|
The Company may terminate the agreement at any time, and for any reason, by prior written notice of at least 18 months.
|
|
|
●
|
Each Williger Management Company may terminate the agreement at any time, by prior written notice of at least 180 days.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The Company may waive receiving actual management services from the Williger Management Company during the prior notice period, but this will not eliminate its obligation to continue paying the Williger Management Company the management fees owed to the Williger Management Company until the termination of the prior notice period.
|
|
|
(4)
|
If a Williger Management Company terminates the Management Services Agreement, the Williger Management Company will be entitled to receive the management fees for a period of six (6) months, which shall begin after the prior notice period, whether or not it provides the Company with any management services during such six-month period.
|
|
|
(5)
|
In the event the Williger Management Company provides the management services to the Company without the presence of Messrs. Zwi Williger or Joseph Williger, as the case may be, and/or in the case of the death and/or permanent disability of Messrs. Zwi Williger or Joseph Williger, the Company will be entitled to terminate the Management Services Agreement immediately.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Both Messrs. Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger have agreed with the Company that if a liquidation order or receivership order is issued against a Williger Management Company which prevents the Williger Management Company from continuing to provide the management services according to the Management Services Agreement, they will immediately commence working for the Company in return for pay and social benefits costing the Company the same amount as the monthly management fees that the Company paid the Williger Management Company to that date, or alternatively, at their sole discretion, shall begin providing the Company with management services via another company owned and controlled by them under the conditions of the Management Services Agreement.
|
|
|
(7)
|
In addition, the Management Services Agreements contain provisions regarding the Company providing vehicles for the use of Messrs. Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger, and regarding full reimbursement of expenses incurred by Messrs. Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger while providing the management services to the Company, including reasonable lodging and travel expenses in Israel and abroad, phone expenses in their home and mobile phone expenses, including calls abroad related to providing the management services to the Company, subject to providing receipts.
|
|
|
●
|
The Company may terminate the agreement at any time, and for any reason, by prior written notice of at least 36 months.
|
|
|
●
|
The Williger Management Company may terminate the agreement at any time, by prior written notice of at least 180 days.
|
|
C.
|
BOARD PRACTICES
|
|
|
●
|
chairman of the board of directors;
|
|
|
●
|
controlling shareholder or his relative; and
|
|
|
●
|
any director employed by or who provides services to the company on a regular basis.
|
|
D.
|
EMPLOYEES
|
|
E.
|
SHARE OWNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
A.
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
Name and Address
|
Number of
Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Percentage of Ordinary Shares
|
||||||
|
Willi Food (1)
|
7,171,737 | 52.84 | % | |||||
|
Joseph Williger (1)(2)
|
7,181,022 | (2) | 52.90 | % | ||||
|
Zwi Williger (1)(2)
|
7,731,256 | (2) | 56.96 | % | ||||
|
All directors and officers as a group (2 persons)
|
7,740,541 | (2) | 57.03 | % | ||||
|
(1)
|
Willi Food’s securities are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The principal executive offices of Willi Food are located at 4 Nahal Harif St., Northern Industrial Zone, Yavne, 81106 Israel. The business address of each of Messrs. Joseph Williger and Zwi Williger is c/o the Company, 4 Nahal Harif St., Northern Industrial Zone, Yavne, 81106 Israel.
|
||
|
(2)
|
Includes 7,171,737 Ordinary Shares owned by Willi Food. Messrs. Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger serve as directors and executive officers of Willi Food and of the Company.
|
||
|
B.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
|
C.
|
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
|
|
|
|
A.
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
(1)
|
On November 24, 2003, Israeli Customs issued the Company and Gold Frost a notice for total payment of NIS 381 thousand claiming that the tariff on a certain product imported by the Company was erroneous. The Company and Gold Frost did not agree with such notice and on November 25, 2004 the Company and Gold Frost filed a lawsuit against the State of Israel to have the notice declared void. A reserve of NIS 308 thousand was included in the Company's 2008 financial statements for purposes of this tariff. On March 9, 2009, the court determined that the Company and GoldFrost are exempt of the payment, and therefore the Company had canceled the abovementioned reserve in the financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
In or about October, 2005, Vitarroz Corp. commenced an action in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, against Willi USA Holdings, Inc. (a subsidiary of the Company), the Company and Zwi Williger (collectively, the "Defendants") due to a dispute concerning a press release announcing the termination of the proposed acquisition of the Vitarroz business by the Company. On August 25, 2008, an arbitration panel granted an award against the Company in the amount of approximately USD 0.6 million. Among other things, the panel found that the press release issued by the Company announcing the termination of the proposed acquisition of the Vitarroz business by the Company constituted a breach of contract and violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In addition, the panel rejected the Company's counterclaims. On October 13, 2008, the Company filed a motion to the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey New to vacate the award. A reserve on the full award was included in the Company's 2008 financial statements. The motion that the Company filed was denied and on August 19, 2009 the Company paid the amount of USD 0.6 million.
|
|
(3)
|
On February 13 2007, a suit was filed against the Company, in which a financial remedy was requested in the amount of NIS 144,543 due to the violation of a distribution agreement and the illicit collection of payments. Over the course of 2007, a statement of defense and a response were filed, and preliminary proceedings were carried out. In addition, pre-trial hearings were held in which the Court instructed the parties to conclude their pre-trial proceedings and a date was set to file affidavits. In 2008, after the affidavits were filed, pre-trial hearings were held, in which the plaintiffs were given the opportunity to file a supplement to an opinion they submitted before November 5, 2008, and the defendant was given an opportunity for completion 30 days later. Inquiries in the case were completed and dates were set for the filing of affidavits. On September 6, 2009, both the plaintiffs and the Company filed their summations. The Company's legal counsel estimate that the Company has a reasonable chance to defend itself, but at the same time, the Company's legal counsel believe their opinion is conditional in light of the inquiries conducted for the case and in light of the court's remarks regarding the failure to disclose the entirety of the relevant documents. Therefore, the Company estimates that there is a chance the court will accept the plaintiff's claim, and therefore the Company's financial statements include a provision for the entire sum of the claim.
|
|
(4)
|
On February 21, 2007, a lawsuit was filed against Gold Frost by Cukierman & Co. Investment House Ltd. in the Tel Aviv-Jaffa Magistrates Court in the amount of NIS 273,852, claiming non payment of fees for professional services rendered. A statement of defense was filed. Given the early stage of these proceedings, the Company is unable at this point to assess the risks involved.
|
|
(5)
|
In September 2007, Thurgeman Construction Co. Ltd. ("Thurgeman") filed a claim against the Company in the District Court of Tel Aviv for the amount of NIS 4,449,340 (plus VAT) (USD 1,170,263) regarding a dispute in connection with the construction of the Company's logistics center in Yavne (the "Project") pursuant to a contract between the parties, dated as of September 9, 2005. Under the terms of the contract, Thurgeman was to serve as the operating contractor for the construction of the frame and the surrounding portions for the construction of the Project.
|
|
(6)
|
On June 18, 2006, the Company filed a claim against Filiz and Ash-Bar in the amount of NIS 4,473,878 (USD 1,185,133) for breach of contract. The complaint was served on Filiz and Ash-Bar through Ash-Bar's chief executive officer. Filiz then filed a request to cancel the complaint, claiming that Ash-Bar is not authorized to accept service of process on its behalf. The request was denied by the court's registrar.
|
|
|
On November 4, 2007, Filiz filed an appeal of the registrar's decision and requested an extension for filing its defense to the complaint pending a decision on the appeal. The appeal was denied and the service of process was accepted by the court.
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the fact that the proceedings are still at a preliminary stage, the Company's legal counsel believes that the complaint is based on sound legal arguments, and that there is a reasonable possibility that a not insignificant portion of the arguments will be sustained by the court.
|
|
(7)
|
On July 7, 2008, WF filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Country of New York, against Laish Israeli Food Ltd., Laish Dairy Ltd., 860 Nostrand Associates Llc., Arie Steiner, Eli Biran (WF's former CEO) and others. The plaintiffs assert claims, inter alia, of fraud, conversion and breach of contract against the seller and former principal of Laish Israeli Food and related parties. Certain defendants have filed motions to dismiss the claim. On August 27, 2008, 860 Nostrand Associates LLC. Filed a lawsuit against the Company, in the amount of USD142,949 claiming that the defendant is liable to it as a guarantor of a certain lease that was allegedly signed by WF. Damages are being sought. The discovery process in the proceedings has commenced and is ongoing. Limited discovery remains to be completed before the hearing which is not scheduled yet.
|
|
(8)
|
On September 22, 2008, a lawsuit was filed against the Company, WF and one of the Company's officers by several WF's Israeli vendors in the Tel Aviv-Jaffa Magistrates Court in the amount of NIS 1,349,899 (USD 357,589), claiming nonpayment of WF for food products that they allegedly supplied to WF. A statement of defense was filed. A pre-trial hearing was held on September 15, 2009, following which the plaintiff filed a request for an appeal of the decision not to recognize a delivery made in Israel as a delivery to WF, as well as a request to permit production to WF outside the Court's jurisdiction. Deliberations regarding the matter of production to WF were returned to the Magistrate's Court, which instructed the plaintiffs to file a proper motion on this issue. Even at the early stage of these proceedings, the Company's management and legal counsel believe that the lawsuit against Company and the Company's officer are without merit, and they intend to vigorously defend against such claims. The amount of the claim is included in WF's financial statements under trade payables item.
|
|
(9)
|
Arbitration filed against Shamir on the matter of a failure to pay NIS 50,000 plus tax which Shamir was purportedly required to pay the plaintiff in accordance with an agreement dated April 10, 2008 signed between the parties. The plaintiff filed a statement of claim in the amount of NIS 1,873,000 before tax, and Shamir filed a statement of defense and a countersuit in which it demanded that the plaintiff refund it for all sums received from it in the amount of NIS 514,934 as well as pay Shamir compensation in the amount of NIS 6,246,886. The plaintiff filed a statement of defense for the countersuit as well as a response to Shamir's statement of defense, and Shamir also filed a response to the statement of defense to the countersuit. The parties filed initial affidavits, followed by a deposition, in which the parties' witnesses were examined. In the latest deposition, Shamir sought to attach additional evidence it claims could clarify and shed light both on the concealment of facts by the plaintiffs before entering the agreement, and on the interests affecting one of the arbitration's witnesses. This motion was accepted. The parties filed summations and responses to the summations and received a ruling from the arbitrator on March 16, 2010. The sum of the claim is listed in Shamir's books as a liability. According to the arbitrator's ruling, Shamir is required to pay the plaintiff the amount of approximately NIS 392,000, which was paid on April 7, 2010.
|
|
(10)
|
On April 16, 2009, the Company was served with a purported class action lawsuit alleging that it misled its customers by illegally marking a product that the Company imports and sells as “sugar free”, according to the Israeli Consumer Protection Law, 1981. The groups which the lawsuit desires to represent include any Israeli resident who bought this product due to such person’s preference for a sugar free or a reduced sugar product (the “Group”). According to the plaintiff, the Group consists of 2,000 customers. The plaintiff appraises its own damages at NIS 2,000 (approximately US$510) and the damages of the entire Group to be NIS 4 million (approximately US$1 million).
On October 12, 2009, a preliminary hearing was held. In the hearing, the judge mentioned to the plaintiff’s attorney that the lawsuit does not meet a procedure of a purported class action and asked both parties to reach a settlement within 30 days. The Company received an offer from the plaintiff attorney to settle the lawsuit for NIS 30,000 (approximately US$8,000). We rejected the offer and the matter is yet to be resolved.
|
|
(11)
|
On May 14, 2009, the Company received from the Sellers of Shamir (the "Sellers") a notice cancelling the acquisition agreement of Shamir (the "Shamir agreement"), and on May 18, 2009, the Company was notified of unilateral actions taken by the Sellers with respect to a change in Shamir's board composition and signatory rights and replacement of the articles of association of Shamir in an effort by the Sellers to deprive the Company of its board representation and signatory rights in Shamir.
|
|
B.
|
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
|
|
|
|
A.
|
OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS
|
|
Calendar Period
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|||||||
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
||||||||
|
Second Quarter (through June 21, 2010)
|
6.07 | 5.42 | ||||||
|
First Quarter
|
7.10 | 5.76 | ||||||
|
2009
|
6.30 | 0.86 | ||||||
|
First Quarter
|
1.63 | 0.86 | ||||||
|
Second Quarter
|
2.29 | 1.26 | ||||||
|
Third Quarter
|
4.50 | 2.22 | ||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
6.30 | 4.32 | ||||||
|
2008
|
6.95 | 1.39 | ||||||
|
First Quarter
|
6.95 | 5.32 | ||||||
|
Second Quarter
|
5.93 | 4.11 | ||||||
|
Third Quarter
|
4.30 | 2.80 | ||||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
2.92 | 1.39 | ||||||
|
2007
|
8.90 | 5.20 | ||||||
|
2006
|
8.83 | 3.22 | ||||||
|
2005
|
8.47 | 3.00 | ||||||
|
June 2010 (through June 21, 2010)
|
5.88 | 5.71 | ||||||
|
May 2010
|
6.03 | 5.42 | ||||||
|
April 2010
|
6.07 | 5.71 | ||||||
|
March 2010
|
7.06 | 5.76 | ||||||
|
February 2010
|
6.96 | 5.90 | ||||||
|
January 2010
|
7.10 | 6.06 | ||||||
|
December 2009
|
6.30 | 4.95 | ||||||
|
B.
|
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
|
|
C.
|
MARKETS
|
|
D.
|
SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
E.
|
DILUTION
|
|
F.
|
EXPENSES ON THE ISSUE
|
|
|
|
A.
|
SHARE CAPITAL
|
|
B.
|
MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
|
|
C.
|
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
|
|
Corporate Taxation Under Inflationary Conditions
|
|
|
●
|
Individual -
The distribution of dividend by an Israeli resident company to an Israeli resident individual will generally be subject to income tax at a rate of 20%. However, a 25% tax rate will apply if the dividend recipient is a “Significant Shareholder” (i.e., a person who holds, directly or indirectly, alone or together with other, 10% or more of one of the Israeli resident company's means of control ) at the time of distribution or at any time during the preceding 12 months period.
|
|
|
●
|
Corporation
-
Dividend
distributed by an Israeli resident corporation to another Israeli resident corporation will be generally exempt from income tax provided the income from which such dividend is distributed was derived or accrued within Israel
.
|
|
|
●
|
If the U.S. resident is a corporation which holds at the taxable year which precede the date of payment of the dividend and during the whole of its prior taxable year (if any), at least 10% of the outstanding shares of the voting stock of the Israeli resident paying corporation and not more then 25% of the gross income of the Israeli resident paying corporation for such prior taxable year (if any) consists of certain type of interest or dividends – the tax rate is 12.5%.
|
|
|
●
|
If both the conditions mentioned in section (i) above are met and the dividend is paid from an Israeli resident company's income which was entitled to a reduced tax rate applicable to an "approved enterprise" or "privileged enterprise" under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments of 1959– the tax rate is 15%.
|
|
|
●
|
In all other cases, the tax rate is 25%.
|
|
|
●
|
Israeli resident corporation – 0%.
|
|
|
●
|
Israeli resident individual – 20%.
|
|
|
●
|
Non-Israeli resident – 20% subject to a reduced tax rate under the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty.
|
|
|
●
|
Individual - The real capital gain will be subject to tax at the rate of 20%. If the shareholder is a Significant Shareholder (as defined above) at any time during the 12 months period preceding such sale, the tax rate will be 25%. A capital gain derived by an individual claiming deduction of financing expenses in respect of such gain will be taxed at the rate of 25%.
|
|
|
●
|
Corporation - The real capital gain derived by corporation will be generally subject to tax at the corporate tax rate (25% in 2010, reduced capital gains tax rate of 25% in 2009). However, the real capital gain derived from sale of securities, as defined in Section 6 of the Inflationary Adjustment Law, by a corporation, which was subject upon August 10, 2005 to the provisions of Section 6 of the Inflationary Adjustment Law, will be taxed at the corporate tax rate (26% in 2009, 25% in 2010).
|
|
|
·
|
a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
·
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; or
|
|
|
·
|
an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.
|
|
Taxation of Distributions
|
|
Sale and Other Disposition of the Company’s Shares
|
|
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
|
|
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
|
|
F.
|
DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS
|
|
G.
|
STATEMENTS BY EXPERTS
|
|
H.
|
DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
|
|
I.
|
SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) from interest change
|
Fair value
|
Gain (loss) from interest change
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Change in Interest as % of interest rate
|
(10 | )% | (5 | )% | 5 | % | 10 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Increase\decrease in financial Income
|
6 | 3 | 1,129 | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
●
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
|
|
|
●
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
|
|
NIS 2009 | NIS 2008 | USD 2009 | USD 2008 | ||||||||||||
|
Audit Fees (1)
|
360,000 | 320,000 | 95,364 | 84,768 | ||||||||||||
|
Tax Fees (2)
|
37,000 | 80,000 | 9,801 | 21,192 | ||||||||||||
|
TOTAL
|
397,000 | 404,000 | 105,208 | 105,960 | ||||||||||||
|
Period
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average Price Paid Per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs
|
||||||||||||
|
Willi Food
|
||||||||||||||||
|
January 6, 2009- January 30, 2009
|
32,365 | 1.439 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
February 2, 2009- February 18, 2009
|
66,065 | 1.443 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
August 27, 2009
|
29,600 | 3.610 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
December 16, 2009
|
20,000 | 5.100 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
Zwi Williger
|
||||||||||||||||
|
March 18, 2009
|
367,000 | * | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
April 16, 2009- April 30, 2009
|
39,275 | 1.528 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
May 1, 2009- May 29, 2009
|
42,799 | 1.926 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
June 1, 2009- June 26, 2009
|
76,737 | 2.201 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
July 14, 2009- July 24, 2009
|
18,421 | 2.526 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
August 3, 2009- August 6, 2009
|
3,225 | 3.177 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
December 15, 2009
|
2,062 | 5.000 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
March 26, 2010
|
10,000 | 5.800 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
Joseph Willige
r
|
||||||||||||||||
|
March 17, 2009- March 24, 2009
|
39,945 | 1.028 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
April 6, 2009- April 20, 2009
|
1,000 | 1.378 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
May 4, 2009- May 29, 2009
|
27,410 | 1.974 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
June 1, 2009- June 15, 2009
|
17,800 | 2.179 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
|
●
|
Executive Sessions
– Under Nasdaq rules, U.S. domestic listed companies, must have a regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present. We do not have such executive sessions.
|
|
|
●
|
Compensation of Officers
-
Under Nasdaq rules, executive compensation must be determined or recommended to the Board for determination by a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors or by independent directors constituting a majority of the Board's independent directors. Not all of our executive compensation is determined in this manner.
|
|
|
●
|
Nominations of Directors
-
Under Nasdaq rules, U.S. domestic listed companies, must have a nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors and must have director nominees selected or recommended by a majority of its independent directors. Our directors are not nominated in this manner.
|
|
|
●
|
Nominations Committee Charter or Board Resolution -
Under Nasdaq rules, U.S. domestic listed companies, must adopt a formal written charter or board resolution, as applicable, addressing the nominations process and such related matters as may be required under the federal securities laws. We do not have such a formal written charter or board resolution.
|
|
|
●
|
Quorum -
Under Nasdaq rules, U.S. domestic listed companies by-laws provide for a quorum of at least 33 1/3 percent of the outstanding shares of the company’s common voting stock. According to our articles our quorum should be at least 25 percent of the outstanding shares of our common voting stock.
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
|
†1.1
|
Memorandum of Association of the Company, as amended (1)
|
|
|
1.2
|
Articles of Association of the Company, as amended (4)
|
|
|
2.1
|
Specimen of Certificate for ordinary shares (2)
|
|
|
4.1
|
Share Option Plan (2)
|
|
|
†4.2
|
Management Agreement between the Company and Yossi Willi Management Investments Ltd.,
dated June 1, 1998 (3)
|
|
|
†4.3
|
Amendment to the Management Agreement between the Company and Yossi Willi Management Investments Ltd., dated August 1, 2005 (4)
|
|
|
†4.4
|
Management Agreement between the Company and Zwi W. & Co. Ltd., dated June 1, 1998 (3)
|
|
|
†4.5
|
Amendment to the Management Agreement between the Company and Zwi W. & Co., Ltd., dated
August 1, 2005 (4)
|
|
|
†4.6
|
Lease of Company’s premises with Titanic Food Ltd., dated November 23, 1998 (3)
|
|
|
†4.7
|
Services Agreement between the Company and Willi Food, dated April 1, 1997 (3)
|
|
|
†4.8
|
Transfer Agreement between the Company and Gold Frost dated February 16, 2006 (4)
|
|
|
†4.9
|
Lease agreement for Logistics Center between the Company and Gold Frost dated February 16, 2006 (4)
|
|
|
4.10
|
Relationship Agreement between the Company, Gold Frost, Willi Food, Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger
dated February 28, 2006 (4)
|
|
|
4.11
|
Placing Agreement between the Company, Gold Frost, certain officers of Gold Frost and Corporate Synergy dated March 2, 2006 (4)
|
|
|
4.12
|
Lock In Agreement, between the Company, Gold Frost, Corporate Synergy and certain officers of Gold Frost, dated March 2, 2006 (4)
|
|
|
4.13
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2006, among the Company and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto. (5)
|
|
|
4.14
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2006, among the Company and the investors signatory thereto. (5)
|
|
|
4.15
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2007, by and among the Company, WF Kosher Food
Distributors, Ltd., Laish Israeli Food Products Ltd. and Arie Steiner.(6)
|
|
|
†4.16
|
Agreement, dated February 11, 2007, between the Company and Mr. Ya'acov Baron, Ms. Hedva Baron, Mr. Li'or Baron, Ms. Gozlan Or'na and Ms. Michal Baron Sha'hak
.
(6)
|
|
|
†4.17
|
Agreement, dated January 2, 2008, between the Company and Mr. Jacob Ginsberg, Mr. Amiram Guy and Shamir Salads 2006 Ltd
.
(7)
|
|
|
4.18
|
Share Purchase Agreement, dated February 13, 2008, between Gold Frost and Kirkeby Cheese
Export
A/S. (7)
|
|
|
4.19
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated February 13, 2008, between Gold Frost and Kirkeby Cheese
Export
A/S. (7)
|
|
|
4.20
|
Co-operation Agreement, dated January 1, 2008, between Kirkeby Cheese Export
A/S,
Haarby Mejeri/Kirkeby Dairy ApS and
Kirkeby International Foods A/S.
(7)
|
|
8
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (4)
|
||
|
8.1
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (7)
|
||
|
8.2
|
Subsidiaries of the Company* | ||
|
12.1
|
Certification of CEO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
||
|
12.2
|
Certification of CFO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
||
|
13.1
|
Certification of CEO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
||
|
13.2
|
Certification of CFO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
||
|
15.(a).1
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*
|
||
|
†
|
English translations from Hebrew original.
|
||
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by Reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997.
|
||
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1, File No. 333-6314.
|
||
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001.
|
||
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005.
|
||
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-3, File No. 333-138200.
|
||
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006.
|
||
|
(7)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
||
|
*
|
Filed Herewith
|
||
|
Page
|
|
|
F - 1
|
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
F - 2
|
|
|
F - 3
|
|
|
F - 4
|
|
|
F - 5
|
|
|
F - 6 - F - 7
|
|
|
F - 8 - F - 68
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Note
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9(*) | |||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Current assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
4a | 87,104 | 78,749 | 23,074 | ||||||||||||
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
4b | 11,356 | 9,367 | 3,008 | ||||||||||||
|
Trade receivables
|
4c | 77,752 | 79,599 | 20,597 | ||||||||||||
|
Other receivables
|
4d | 1,990 | 3,860 | 527 | ||||||||||||
|
Current tax assets
|
- | 2,456 | - | |||||||||||||
|
Inventories
|
4e | 44,810 | 34,417 | 11,870 | ||||||||||||
|
Total current assets
|
223,012 | 208,448 | 59,076 | |||||||||||||
|
Non-current assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
56,364 | 55,574 | 14,931 | |||||||||||||
|
Less -accumulated depreciation
|
16,979 | 13,467 | 4,497 | |||||||||||||
| 7 | 39,385 | 42,107 | 10,434 | |||||||||||||
|
Long term receivables
|
760 | - | 201 | |||||||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
12,577 | 12,666 | 3,332 | |||||||||||||
|
Goodwill
|
8a | 1,936 | 3,829 | 513 | ||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets, net
|
9a | 4,674 | 5,181 | 1,238 | ||||||||||||
|
Deferred taxes
|
15c | 375 | 1,111 | 99 | ||||||||||||
|
Total non-current assets
|
59,707 | 64,894 | 15,817 | |||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
282,719 | 273,342 | 74,893 | |||||||||||||
|
Equity and liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term bank credit
|
11 | 10,372 | 17,562 | 2,748 | ||||||||||||
|
Trade payables
|
10a | 49,382 | 53,728 | 13,081 | ||||||||||||
|
Provisions
|
13 | 145 | 6,197 | 39 | ||||||||||||
|
Current tax liabilities
|
2,801 | 1,050 | 742 | |||||||||||||
|
Other payables and accrued expenses
|
10b | 8,976 | 4,971 | 2,378 | ||||||||||||
|
Employees Benefits
|
14a | 2,977 | 2,544 | 789 | ||||||||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
74,653 | 86,052 | 19,777 | |||||||||||||
|
Non-current liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term bank loans
|
11 | 97 | 267 | 26 | ||||||||||||
|
Deferred taxes
|
15c
|
445 | 442 | 117 | ||||||||||||
|
Warrants to issue shares
|
- | 5 | - | |||||||||||||
|
Retirement benefit obligation
|
14
|
1,044 | 994 | 277 | ||||||||||||
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
1,586 | 1,708 | 420 | |||||||||||||
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Shareholders' equity
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Share capital
|
1,113 | 1,113 | 295 | |||||||||||||
|
Additional paid in capital
|
59,056 | 59,056 | 15,644 | |||||||||||||
|
Capital fund
|
247 | 247 | 65 | |||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation reserve
|
639 | 369 | 169 | |||||||||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
141,883 | 111,447 | 37,585 | |||||||||||||
|
Equity attributable to owners of the Company
|
202,938 | 172,232 | 53,758 | |||||||||||||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
3,542 | 13,350 | 938 | |||||||||||||
| 206,480 | 185,582 | 54,696 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total equity and liabilities
|
282,719 | 273,342 | 74,893 | |||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9(*) | ||||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
20a | 303,460 | 289,068 | 201,617 | 80,387 | |||||||||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
20b | 219,569 | 228,839 | 156,062 | 58,164 | |||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
83,891 | 60,229 | 45,555 | 22,223 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Selling expenses
|
20c | 35,598 | 31,800 | 20,602 | 9,430 | |||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
20d | 20,451 | 16,863 | 12,280 | 5,417 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other (income) expenses
|
21 | (5,330 | ) | 1,846 | (454 | ) | (1,411 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 50,719 | 50,509 | 32,428 | 13,436 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Operating profit
|
33,172 | 9,720 | 13,127 | 8,787 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Finance income
|
22a | 2,744 | (4,167 | ) | 2,111 | 727 | ||||||||||||||
|
Finance expense
|
22b | 1,273 | 673 | (323 | ) | 337 | ||||||||||||||
|
Finance income (expense), net
|
1,471 | (4,840 | ) | 2,434 | 390 | |||||||||||||||
|
Profit before taxes on income
|
34,643 | 4,880 | 15,561 | 9,177 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Taxes on income
|
15a | 5,043 | 1,117 | 2,174 | 1,336 | |||||||||||||||
|
Profit from continuing operations
|
29,600 | 3,763 | 13,387 | 7,841 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Profit (Loss) from discontinued operations
|
1,928 | (3,496 | ) | (8,748 | ) | 511 | ||||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year
|
31,528 | 267 | 4,639 | 8,352 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Attributable to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owners of the Company
|
23a | 30,436 | (786 | ) | 2,342 | 8,063 | ||||||||||||||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
1,092 | 1,053 | 2,297 | 289 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
31,528 | 267 | 4,639 | 8,352 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
23 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic from continuing operations
|
2.81 | 0.30 | 1.14 | 0.75 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Basic from discontinued operations
|
0.15 | (0.38 | ) | (0.91 | ) | 0.04 | ||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
2.96 | (0.08 | ) | 0.23 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||
|
Diluted from continuing operations
|
2.81 | 0.30 | 1.14 | 0.75 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted from discontinued operations
|
0.15 | (0.38 | ) | (0.91 | ) | 0.04 | ||||||||||||||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
2.96 | (0.08 | ) | 0.23 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||
|
Shares used in computation of basic EPS
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Shares used in computation of diluted EPS
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Note
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9(*) | |||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net income
|
31,528 | 267 | 4,639 | 8,352 | |||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Translation differences for foreign operations
|
52 | 742 | (615 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income for the year
|
52 | 742 | (615 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
31,580 | 1,009 | 4,024 | 8,366 | |||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Owners of the Company
|
30,475 | (3 | ) | 1,928 | 8,073 | ||||||||||||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
1,105 | 1,012 | 2,096 | 293 | |||||||||||||
| 31,580 | 1,009 | 4,024 | 8,366 | ||||||||||||||
|
Share capital
|
Additional paid in capital
|
Capital fund
|
Foreign currency translation reserve
|
Retained earnings
|
Attributable to owners of the parent
|
Non-controlling interest
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - January 1, 2007
|
1,113 | 59,056 | - | - | 109,891 | 170,060 | 14,750 | 184,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year
|
- | - | - | - | 2,342 | 2,342 | 2,297 | 4,639 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currency translation differences
|
- | - | - | (414 | ) | - | (414 | ) | (201 | ) | (615 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
(414 | ) | 112,233 | 171,988 | 16,846 | 188,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-controlling interests in newly acquired subsidiary
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1,919 | 1,919 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of non-controlling interest
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (146 | ) | (146 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - December 31, 2007
|
1,113 | 59,056 | - | (414 | ) | 112,233 | 171,988 | 18,619 | 190,607 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year
|
- | - | - | - | (786 | ) | (786 | ) | 1,053 | 267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currency translation differences
|
- | - | - | 783 | - | 783 | (41 | ) | 742 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
369 | 111,447 | 171,985 | 19,631 | 191,616 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-controlling interests in newly acquired subsidiary
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 3,350 | 3,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of non-controlling interest
|
- | - | 247 | - | - | 247 | (9,362 | ) | (9,115 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividend paid to non-controlling interests
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (269 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - December 31, 2008
|
1,113 | 59,056 | 247 | 369 | 111,447 | 172,232 | 13,350 | 185,582 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year
|
- | - | - | - | 30,436 | 30,436 | 1,092 | 31,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currency translation differences
|
- | - | - | 39 | - | 39 | 13 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
408 | 141,883 | 202,707 | 14,455 | 217,162 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of non-controlling interest
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (7,559 | ) | (7,559 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividend paid to non-controlling interests
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (101 | ) | (101 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Disposal of subsidiary
|
- | - | - | 231 | - | 231 | (3,253 | ) | (3,022 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - December 31, 2009
|
1,113 | 59,056 | 247 | 639 | 141,883 | 202,938 | 3,542 | 206,480 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9(*) | |||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash flows - operating activities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Profit from continuing operations
|
29,600 | 3,763 | 13,387 | 7,841 | ||||||||||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net profit to net cash from\
continuing operating activities(Appendix A)
|
(14,803 | ) | 11,790 | (2,149 | ) | (3,922 | ) | |||||||||
|
Net cash from continuing operating activities
|
14,797 | 15,553 | 11,238 | 3,919 | ||||||||||||
|
Net cash from (used in) discontinued operating activities
|
2,876 | 3,346 | (3,296 | ) | 762 | |||||||||||
|
Cash flows - investing activities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition of property plant and equipment
|
(1,839 | ) | (3,109 | ) | (10,855 | ) | (487 | ) | ||||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of property plant and Equipment
|
276 | 165 | 16 | 73 | ||||||||||||
|
Additions to intangible assets
|
- | (300 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||
|
Additions to prepaid expenses
|
(1,086 | ) | (1,579 | ) | - | (288 | ) | |||||||||
|
Long term deposit, net
|
(7 | ) | (44 | ) | (119 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
|
Proceeds from realization (purchase) of marketable securities, net
|
663 | 16,714 | (17,378 | ) | 176 | |||||||||||
|
Purchase of additional shares in subsidiary
|
(2,314 | ) | (9,250 | ) | (182 | ) | (613 | ) | ||||||||
|
Disposal of subsidiary
|
2,185 | - | - | 579 | ||||||||||||
|
Purchase of subsidiaries
|
- | (5,664 | ) | (15,400 | ) | - | ||||||||||
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities
|
(2,122 | ) | (3,067 | ) | (43,918 | ) | (562 | ) | ||||||||
|
Net cash used in discontinued investing activities
|
(30 | ) | (36 | ) | (416 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||
|
Cash flows - financing activities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred expenses related to Public Offering
|
(110 | ) | - | - | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Short-term bank credit, net
|
(3,362 | ) | (1,797 | ) | - | (890 | ) | |||||||||
|
Repayment of loans
|
(1,601 | ) | (1,369 | ) | - | (424 | ) | |||||||||
|
Proceeds of loans
|
487 | 6,803 | - | 129 | ||||||||||||
|
Net cash from (used in) continuing financing activities
|
(4,586 | ) | 3,637 | - | (1,214 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Net cash from (used in) discontinued financing activities
|
(2,566 | ) | (2,312 | ) | 6,781 | (680 | ) | |||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
8,369 | 17,121 | (29,611 | ) | 2,217 | |||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year
|
78,749 | 61,649 | 91,398 | 20,860 | ||||||||||||
|
Net foreign exchange difference on cash and cash equivalents from discontinued activities
|
(14 | ) | (21 | ) | (138 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents of the end of the financial year
|
87,104 | 78,749 | 61,649 | 23,074 | ||||||||||||
|
A.
|
Adjustments to reconcile net profit to net cash from operating activities
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9(*) | |||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revaluation of loans from banks and others
|
32 | 106 | - | 8 | ||||||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
739 | (505 | ) | (433 | ) | 196 | ||||||||||
|
Capital Gain on purchase of additional shares in subsidiary
|
(5,245 | ) | - | - | (1,389 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on marketable securities
|
(2,652 | ) | 5,186 | 56 | (703 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
5,777 | 5,022 | 2,432 | 1,530 | ||||||||||||
|
Capital gain on disposal of property
|
||||||||||||||||
|
plant and equipment
|
(85 | ) | (85 | ) | (16 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||
|
Employees benefit, net
|
50 | 545 | (122 | ) | 13 | |||||||||||
|
Change in value of warrants to issue shares
|
(5 | ) | (1,035 | ) | (767 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Increase in trade receivables and other receivables
|
(7,196 | ) | (4,665 | ) | (1,374 | ) | (1,906 | ) | ||||||||
|
Increase in inventories
|
(10,986 | ) | (3,789 | ) | (5,920 | ) | (2,910 | ) | ||||||||
|
Decrease in long term receivables
|
103 | - | - | 27 | ||||||||||||
|
Increase in trade and other payables, and other current liabilities
|
4,665 | 11,010 | 3,995 | 1,235 | ||||||||||||
| (14,803 | ) | 11,790 | (2,149 | ) | (3,922 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Interest paid
|
627 | 835 | 104 | 166 | ||||||||||||
|
Income tax paid
|
2,191 | 3,736 | 7,645 | 580 | ||||||||||||
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
|
|
|
B.
|
Definitions
:
|
|
The Company
|
-
|
G. WILLI-FOOD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
|
|
The Group
|
-
|
the Company and its Subsidiaries, a list of which is presented in Note 5.
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
-
|
companies in which the Company exercises control (as defined by IAS 27), and whose financial statements are fully consolidated with those of the Company.
|
|
Related Parties
|
-
|
as defined by IAS 24.
|
|
Interested Parties
|
-
|
as defined in the Israeli Securities law and Regulations, 1968.
|
|
Controlling Shareholder
|
-
|
as defined in the Israeli Securities law and Regulations, 1968.
|
|
NIS
|
-
|
New Israeli Shekel.
|
|
CPI
|
-
|
the Israeli consumer price index.
|
|
Dollar
|
-
|
the U.S. dollar.
|
|
Euro
|
-
|
the United European currency.
|
|
|
A.
|
Applying international accounting standards (IFRS)
|
|
|
Statement of compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
|
|
|
B.
|
Basis of preparation
Until December 31, 2003, Israel was considered a country in which hyper-inflation conditions exist. Therefore, non-monetary balances in the balance sheet were presented on the historical nominal amount and were adjusted to changes in the CPI. As of December 31, 2003 when the economy ceased to be hyper-inflationary and the Company no longer adjusted its financial statements to the ISRAELI CPI, the adjusted amounts as of this date were used as the historical costs. The financial statements were edited on the basis of the historical cost, except for:
|
|
|
§
|
Assets and liabilities measured by fair value: financial assets measured by fair value recorded directly as profit or loss.
|
|
|
§
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
|
|
|
§
|
Property, plant and equipment and intangibles assets are presented at the lower of the cost less accumulated amortizations and the recoverable amount.
|
|
|
§
|
Liabilities to employees as described in note 2U.
|
|
|
C.
|
Foreign currencies
The individual financial statements of each group entity are presented in New Israeli Shekel the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (its functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are also presented in the New Israeli Shekel ("NIS"), which is the functional currency of the Company and the presentation currency for the consolidated financial statements.
In preparing the financial statements of the individual entities, transactions in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency (foreign currencies) are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. (Non-monetary items carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined). Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not retranslated.
Exchange differences are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they accrue.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional, currency’). The consolidated financial statements are presented in ‘NIS’, which is the company’s functional and the group’s presentation currency.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement, except when deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges.
|
|
|
D.
|
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash equivalents include unrestricted liquid deposits, maturity period of which, as at the date of investments therein, does not exceed three months.
|
|
|
E.
|
Basis of consolidation
|
|
|
F.
|
Business combination
Acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses are accounted for using the purchase method. The cost of the business combination is measured as the aggregate of the fair values (at the date of exchange) of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Group in exchange for control of the acquiree, plus any costs directly attributable to the business combination. The acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3 Business Combinations are recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date, except for
non-current assets (or disposal groups) that are classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, which are recognised and measured at fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
|
F.
|
Business combination (Cont.)
Goodwill arising on acquisition is recognised as an asset and initially measured at cost, being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the Group’s interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised. If, after reassessment, the Group’s interest in the net fair value of the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceeds the cost of the business combination, the excess is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
The interest of non-controlling shareholders in the acquiree is initially measured at the non-controlling’s proportion of the net fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised.
|
|
|
G.
|
Goodwill
Goodwill arising on the acquisition of a subsidiary represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the subsidiary or jointly controlled entity recognised at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is initially recognised as an asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Group’s cash-generating units expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when there is an indication that the unit may be impaired. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount of the unit, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. An impairment loss recognised for goodwill is not reversed in a subsequent period.
On disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal.
|
|
|
H.
|
Discontinued operations
Exercised activities constitute discontinued activities when they represent a separate major line of business activity or geographical area of operations, or constitute part of a single and coordinated design for the exercise of an area of business activity, or a geographical area of activity, which is central and separate. Revenues and expenses belonging to discontinued activities are presented in the consolidated statements of operations less taxes on income in all periods presented as "Profit (Loss) from discontinued operations". Cash flows due to discontinued activities are presented together in the cash flow report for each reporting period presented in accordance with the classification of operating activity, investment activity and finance activity.
Regarding the IFRS 5 revision "Non Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Activities" as part of the 2008 improvements to International Financial Reporting Standards, see Note 2X(3).
|
|
|
I.
|
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipments are tangible items, which are held for use in the manufacture or supply of goods or services, or leased to others, which are predicted to be used for more than one period. The Company presents its property, plant and equipments items according to the cost model.
Under the cost method - a property, plant and equipment are presented at the balance sheet at cost (net of any investment grants), less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. The cost includes the cost of the assets acquisition as well as costs that can be directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.
|
|
|
I.
|
Property, plant and equipment (Cont.)
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method at rates considered adequate to depreciate the assets over their estimated useful lives. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed over the shorter of the term of the lease, including any extension period, where the Company intends to exercise such option, or their useful life.
|
|
The annual depreciation and amortization rates are:
|
%
|
||||
|
construction
|
4 | ||||
|
Motor vehicles
|
15-20 |
(mainly 20%)
|
|||
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
6-15 |
(mainly 15%)
|
|||
|
Computers
|
20-33 |
(mainly 33%)
|
|||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
10 | ||||
|
|
J.
|
Intangible assets, except goodwill
An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance.
An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life shall not be amortized.
In accordance with IAS 36, an entity is required to test an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life for impairment by comparing its recoverable amount with its carrying amount:
(a) annually, and
(b) whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired.
Intangible assets with a finite useful life are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Amortization is charged according to the straight-line method over their estimated useful life. See also Note 9.
Useful lives of Intangible assets:
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination:
|
|
|
Technology knowledge
|
10
|
|
Customers relationship
|
15 |
|
Trade name
|
25
|
|
Other intangible asset:
|
|
|
Trade name
|
7
|
|
|
J.
|
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination (Cont.)
Intangible assets acquired separately
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are identified and recognised separately from goodwill where they satisfy the definition of an intangible asset and their fair values can be measured reliably. The cost of such intangible assets is their fair value at the acquisition date.
The estimated useful life and amortisation method are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period, with the effect of any changes in estimate being accounted for on a prospective basis.
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination and recognised separately from goodwill are initially recognised at their fair value at the acquisition date (which is regarded as their cost).
Subsequent to initial recognition, intangible assets acquired in a business combination are reported at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, on the same basis as intangible assets that are acquired separately.
|
|
|
K.
|
Impairment of tangible and intangible assets excluding goodwill
At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest group of cash-generating units for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
|
|
|
L.
|
Inventories
Inventories are assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production for such sale or in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost of inventories includes all the cost of purchase, direct labor, fixed and variable production over heads and other cost that are incurred, in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
Cost determined as follows:
|
|
Raw material, components and packaging
|
-
|
by the "first-in, first-out" method;
|
|
Processing goods
|
-
|
cost of materials plus labor
|
|
finished products
|
-
|
on the basis of standard cost which approximates actual production cost (materials, labor and indirect manufacturing costs).
|
|
Products
|
-
|
weighted average method
|
|
|
M.
|
Financial assets
(1) General
|
|
|
All financial assets are recognised and derecognised on trade date where the purchase or sale of a financial asset is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the financial asset within the timeframe established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, plus transaction costs, except for those financial assets classified as at fair value through profit or loss, which are initially measured at fair value.
|
|
|
·
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
|
·
|
it has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near future; or |
|
|
·
|
it is a part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Group manages together and has a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking; or
|
|
·
|
it is a derivative that is not designated and effective as a hedging instrument.
|
|
|
M.
|
Financial assets (Cont.)
(3) Loans and receivables
|
|
|
Trade receivables, loans, and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Impairment of financial assets
Financial assets, other than those at FVTPL, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each balance sheet date.
Financial assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows of the investment have been impacted.
For all other financial assets, an objective evidence of impairment could include:
|
|
|
•
|
Significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; or
|
|
|
•
|
Default or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or
|
|
|
•
|
It becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization.
|
|
|
For certain categories of financial asset, such as trade receivables, assets that are assessed not to be impaired individually are, in addition, assessed for impairment on a collective basis. Objective evidence of impairment for a portfolio of receivables could include the Group’s past experience of collecting payments, an increase in the number of delayed payments in the portfolio past the average credit period, as well as observable changes in national or local economic conditions that correlate with default on receivables.
For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate.
The carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced by the impairment loss directly for all financial assets with the exception of trade receivables, where the carrying amount is reduced through the use of an allowance account.
When a trade receivable is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in profit or loss.
In a subsequent period, if the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss to the extent that the carrying amount of the investment at the date the impairment is reversed does not exceed what the amortized cost would have been had the impairment not been recognized.
|
|
|
N.
|
Financial liabilities and equity instruments issued by the Group
|
|
|
(1)
|
Classification as debt or equity
Debt and equity instruments are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement.
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Group are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.
Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities ‘at FVTPL’ or ‘other financial liabilities’. |
|
|
(2)
|
Consumer price index financial liabilities
The Company has Consumer Price Index ("CPI")-linked financial liabilities that are not measured at fair value through profit or loss. For those liabilities, the Company determines the effective interest rate as a real rate plus linkage differences according to the actual changes in the CPI up to the balance sheet date.
|
|
|
O.
|
Derivative financial instruments
The Group enters into a certain derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange rate risk, including foreign exchange forward contracts.
Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at each balance sheet date. The resulting gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss immediately.
|
|
|
P.
|
Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue is reduced for estimated customer returns, rebates and other similar allowances.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Sale of goods
Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when all the following conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
·
|
The Group has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods;
|
|
|
·
|
The Group retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold
|
|
|
·
|
The amount of revenue can be measured reliably;
|
|
|
·
|
It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity; and
|
|
|
·
|
The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.
|
|
|
P.
|
Revenue recognition (Cont.)
|
|
|
Revenue from a contract to provide services is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the contract. The stage of completion of the contract is determined as follows:
|
|
|
·
|
The amount of revenue can be measured reliably;
|
|
|
·
|
It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity;
|
|
|
·
|
The stage of completion of the installation can be measured reliably at the balance sheet date;
|
|
|
·
|
The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably;
|
|
|
·
|
installation fees are recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the installation, determined as the proportion of the total time expected to install that has elapsed at the end of the reporting period; and
|
|
|
·
|
servicing fees included in the price of products sold are recognised by reference to the proportion of the total cost of providing the servicing for the product sold, taking into account historical trends in the number of services actually provided on past goods sold.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Interest revenue
Interest revenue is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to that asset’s net carrying amount.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Dividend revenue
Dividend revenue from investments is recognised when the shareholder’s right to receive payment has been established.
|
|
|
Q.
|
Leasing
|
|
|
(1)
|
General
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The Group as lessee
Assets held under finance leases are initially recognised as assets of the Group at their fair value at the inception of the lease or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation.
Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly to profit or loss.
Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In instance of operating lease agreements where lease payments are not paid at the beginning of the lease period, or where the lease payments are reduced, and the Group is getting additional benefits from the lessoe, operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Lease agreements with the ILA with respect to a parcel of land is classified as operating leases. The prepaid lease payments are recognized on the balance sheet as "Prepaid expenses", and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease period.
|
|
|
R.
|
Provisions
(1) General
|
|
|
Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Group will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation.
Where a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows.
When some or all of the economic benefits to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, the receivable is recognized as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably.
|
|
|
Present obligations arising under onerous contracts are recognised and measured as provisions. An onerous contract is considered to exist where the Group has a contract under which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it.
|
|
|
S.
|
Share-based payments
Equity-settled share-based payments to employees and others providing similar services are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date using the Black&Sholts model.
The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group’s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest.
At each balance sheet date, the Group revises its estimate of the number of equity instruments expected to vest. The impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, is recognised in profit or loss over the remaining vesting period, with a corresponding adjustment to the equity-settled employee benefits reserve.
Equity-settled share-based payment transactions with other parties are measured at the fair value of the goods or services received, except where the fair value cannot be estimated reliably, in which case they are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments granted, measured at the date the entity obtains the goods or the counterparty renders the service.
|
|
|
T.
|
Taxation
Income tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Current tax
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognised on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and are accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are generally recognised for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the liability is settled or the asset realised, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Group expects, at the reporting date, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
|
|
|
U.
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
(1)
|
Post-Employment Benefits
The Group's
post-employment benefits
include: benefits to retirees and liabilities for severance benefits. The Group's post-employment benefits are classified as
Defined
Benefit Plans
.
Expenses in respect of a
Defined Benefit Plan
are carried to the income statement in accordance with the
Projected Unit Credit Method
, while using actuarial estimates that are performed at each balance sheet date. The current value of the Group's obligation in respect of the defined benefit plan is determined by discounting the future projected cash flows from the plan by the market yields on government bonds, denominated in the currency in which the benefits in respect of the plan will be paid, and whose redemption periods are approximately identical to the projected settlement dates of the plan.
Actuarial profits and losses are recognized in earning when incurred.
The Group's liability in respect of the
Defined Benefit Plan
which is presented in the Group's balance sheet, includes the current value of the obligation in respect of the defined benefit, net of the fair value of the
Defined Benefit Plan
assets.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Short term employee benefits
Short term employee benefits are benefits which it is anticipated will be utilized or which are to be paid during a period that does not exceed 12 months from the end of the period in which the service that creates entitlement to the benefit was provided.
Short term company benefits include the company’s liability for short term absences, payment of grants, bonuses and compensation. These benefits are recorded to the statement of operations when created. The benefits are measured on a non capitalized basis. The difference between the amount of the short term benefits to which the employee is entitled and the amount paid is therefore recognized as an asset or liability.
|
|
|
V.
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
W.
|
Exchange Rates and Linkage Basis
|
|
|
(1)
|
Balances in foreign currency or linked thereto are included in the financial statements based on the representative exchange rates, as published by the Bank of Israel, that were prevailing at the balance sheet date.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Following are the changes in the representative exchange rate of the U.S. dollar vis-a-vis the NIS and in the Israeli CPI:
|
|
As of:
|
Representative exchange rate of the Euro
(NIS per
ˆ
1)
|
Representative exchange rate of the dollar
(NIS per $1)
|
CPI
“in respect of”
(in points)
|
|||||||||
|
December 31, 2009
|
5.4417 | 3.775 | 105.2 | |||||||||
|
December 31, 2008
|
5.2973 | 3.802 | 101.24 | |||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) during the:
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
2.73 | (0.71 | ) | 3.91 | ||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
(6.4 | ) | (1.14 | ) | 3.80 | |||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
1.71 | (8.97 | ) | 3.40 | ||||||||
|
|
X.
|
Adoption of new and revised Standards and interpretations
|
|
|
(1)
|
Standards and Interpretations affecting amounts reported in the current period (and/or prior periods)
|
|
|
·
|
Improving Disclosures about Financial Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures)
The amendments to IFRS 7 expand the disclosures required in respect of fair value measurements and liquidity risk. The Group has elected not to provide comparative information for these expanded disclosures in the current year in accordance with the transitional reliefs offered in these amendments.
|
|
|
·
|
IFRS 8
Operating Segments
The Group has adopted IFRS 8 Operating Segments effectively from January 1 2009. IFRS 8 requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about components of the Group that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources to the segments and to assess their performance. In contrast, the predecessor Standard (IAS 14 Segment Reporting) required an entity to identify two sets of segments (business and geographical), using a risks and returns approach, with the entity’s ‘system of internal financial reporting to key management personnel’ serving only as the starting point for the identification of such segments. As a result, following the adoption of IFRS 8, the identification of the Group’s reportable segments has changed. See note 28.
|
|
|
X.
|
Adoption of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Standards and Interpretations affecting amounts reported in the current period (and/or prior periods) (Cont.)
|
|
|
·
|
IAS 1 (revised) Presentation of Financial Statements
IAS 1(revised) has introduced terminology changes (including revised titles for the financial statements) and changes in the format and content of the financial statements. In addition, the revised Standard has required the presentation of additional report to the financial statements, "Statement of Comprehensive Income", and additional balance sheet report for the earlier period represented in the financial statements in case of change in accounting policy via retroactively, restatement and reclassification.
IAS 1(revised) apply retroactively on reporting periods starting January 1 2009. According to the standard the Group represents Statement of Comprehensive Income.
During 2009 an additional amendment to IAS1 has been published which is in effect commencing January 1, 2010. At this stage, the management of the Group can not estimate the influence of the implementation of the standard on the financial statements of the Group.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Standards and Interpretations adopted with no effect on financial statements
|
|
|
·
|
Amendment to IAS 19, Employee Benefits.
Based on the amendment, classification of employee benefits as short-term or other long-term benefits will be done based on the date on which the liability is to be settled. According to the aforesaid, certain benefits were classified as short-term benefits.
|
|
|
·
|
IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation
The Interpretation provides guidance on the detailed requirements for net investment hedging for certain hedge accounting designations.
|
|
|
·
|
Addendum to IFRS 2, Share Based Payments - Vesting Conditions and Cancellation
The addendum to the standard determined the vesting conditions which have to be taken into account in fair value measurement of share based payment arrangements. In addition, the addendum explains the measurement of fair value of instruments with non-vesting conditions and of cancellations.
|
|
|
·
|
Amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
The amendment to IAS 32 changes the definition of a financial liability, financial asset and capital instrument and determines that certain financial instruments, which are exercisable by their holder, will be classified as capital instruments.
|
|
|
·
|
Amendments to IAS 38 Intangible Assets
As part of Improvements to IFRSs (2008), IAS 38 has been amended to state that an entity is permitted to recognise a prepayment asset for advertising or promotional expenditure only up to the point at which the entity has the right to access the goods purchased or up to the point of receipt of services.
|
|
|
·
|
Embedded Derivatives (Amendments to IFRIC 9 and IAS 39)
The amendments clarify the accounting for embedded derivatives in the case of a reclassification of a financial asset out of the ‘fair value through profit or loss’ category.
|
|
|
X.
|
Adoption of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.)
|
|
|
(3)
|
Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective
|
|
|
·
|
IAS 27 (Amended) “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements “
The standard prescribes the rules for the accounting treatment of consolidated and separate financial statements. Among other things, the standard stipulates that transactions with non-controlling shareholders, in the context of which the company holds control of the subsidiary before and after the transaction, will be treated as capital transactions. In the context of transactions, subsequent to which the company loses control in the subsidiary, the remaining investment is to be measured as of the date that control is lost, at fair value, with the difference as compared to book value to be recorded to the statement of operations. The non-controlling interest in the losses of a subsidiary, which exceed its share in shareholders’ equity, will be allocated to it in every case, while ignoring its obligations and ability to make additional investments in the subsidiary.
The provisions of the standard apply to annual financial reporting periods which start on January 1, 2010 and thereafter. Earlier adoption is permitted, on the condition that it will be done simultaneous with early adoption of IFRS 3 (amended). The standard will be implemented retrospectively, excluding a number of exceptions, as to which the provisions of the standard will be implemented prospectively. At this stage, the management of the Group can not estimate the influence of the implementation of the standard on the financial statements of the Group.
|
|
|
·
|
IFRS 3 (Amended) “Business Combinations”
The new standard stipulates the rules for the accounting treatment of business combinations. Among other things, the standard determines measurement rules for contingent consideration in business combinations which is to be measured as a derivative financial instrument. The transaction costs directly connected with the business combination will be recorded to the statement of operations when incurred. Non-controlling interests will be measured at the time of the business combination to the extent of their share in the fair value of the assets, including goodwill, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquired entity, or to the extent of their share in the fair value of the net assets, as aforementioned, but excluding their share in goodwill.
As for business combinations where control is achieved after a number of acquisitions (acquisition in stages), the earlier purchases of the acquired company will be measured at the time that control is achieved at their fair value, while recording the difference to the statement of operations.
The standard will apply to business combinations that take place from January 1, 2010 and thereafter. Earlier adoption is possible, on the condition that it will be simultaneous with early adoption of IAS 27 (amended).
At this stage, the management of the Group can not estimate the influence of the implementation of the standard on the financial statements of the Group.
|
|
|
·
|
IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners
The Interpretation provides guidance on the appropriate accounting treatment when an entity distributes assets other than cash as dividends to its shareholders.
|
|
|
X.
|
Adoption of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.)
|
|
|
(3)
|
Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective (Cont.)
|
|
|
·
|
IFRIC 19 -Extinguishing Liabilities with Equity Instruments
The Interpretation applies when a debtor extinguishing a liability fully or partly by issuing equity instruments to the creditor. If a debtor issues equity instruments to a creditor to extinguish all or part of a financial liability, those equity instruments are 'consideration paid' in accordance with IAS 39. Accordingly, the debtor should derecognize the financial liability fully or partly. The debtor should measure the equity instruments issued to the creditor at fair value, unless fair value is not reliably determinable, in which case the equity instruments issued are measured at the fair value of the liability extinguished. If it does, the debtor must allocate the fair value of the consideration paid between the liability extinguished and the liability retained. The debtor recognizes in profit or loss the difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability (or part) extinguished and the measurement of the equity instruments issued. The provision of IFRIC 19 is effective for period beginning on January 1, 2011.
At this stage, the management of the Group can not estimate the influence of the implementation of the standard on the financial statements of the Group.
|
|
|
·
|
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments
The Standard is part of the wider project to replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and replaces IAS 39 with respect to classification and measurement of financial assets. The standard requires financial assets to be measured at amortized cost or fair value. An investment in a debt investment is measured at amortized cost if the objective of the business model is to hold assets in order to collect contractual cash flows and the contractual terms give rise, on specified dates, to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding. All other financial assets are measured at fair value.
In addition, embedded derivatives are no longer separated from hybrid contracts that have a financial asset host. Instead, the entire hybrid contract is assessed for classification using the principles above. Moreover, investments in equity instruments are measured at fair value and gains and losses on remeasurement are recognized in the statement of income. However, for an investment in an equity instrument that is not held for trading, the Standard allows an entity to elect to present all fair value changes from the investment in other comprehensive income (except for dividends). No amount recognized in other comprehensive income is ever reclassified to the statement of income. The Standard does not apply to financial liabilities.
The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1 2013. Earlier adoption is permitted, under certain conditions. The standard generally requires retrospective application, except for several exceptions. In particular, if an entity adopts the standard for reporting periods beginning before January 1 2012 it is not required to restate prior periods. At this stage, the management of the Group can not estimate the influence of the implementation of the standard on the financial statements of the Group.
|
|
|
X.
|
Adoption of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.)
|
|
|
(3)
|
Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective (Cont.)
|
|
|
·
|
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment.
In June 2009, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment. These amendments clarify the scope of IFRS 2, as well as the accounting for group cash-settled share-based payment transactions in the separate (or individual) financial statements of an entity receiving the goods or services when another group entity or shareholder has the obligation to settle the award. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1 2010.
|
|
|
·
|
Amendments to IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
International Accounting Standards Boards’ clarification (as part of Improvements to IFRSs (2008)) determines that Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the non-current asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification. When the Group is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary, all of the assets and liabilities of that subsidiary are classified as held for sale when the criteria described above are met, regardless of whether the Group will retain a non-controlling interest in its former subsidiary after the sale. Non-current assets (and disposal groups) classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their previous carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
|
·
|
IFRS 8 Operating Segments
In the framework of the Improvements to IFRSs project from 2009, IFRS 8, with respect to Operating Segments, was amended. According to the Amendment, discloser of a measure of segment assets is required only if that measure is regularly reported to the chief operating decision maker. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1 2010.
|
|
|
·
|
Amendment to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation
The amendment addresses the accounting for rights issues to the existing shareholders, that allows the shareholder to acquire a fixed number of an entity's own equity instruments for a fixed amount of any currency, that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuer, are equity instruments if the entity offers the rights pro rata to all of its existing shareholders of the same class of its own non-derivative equity instruments.
The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1 2011.
|
|
|
X.
|
Adoption of new and revised Standards and interpretations (Cont.)
|
|
|
(3)
|
Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective (Cont.)
|
|
|
·
|
Amendments to IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows (adopted in advance of effective date of 1 January 2010)
The amendments specify that only expenditures that result in a recognised asset in the statement of financial position can be classified as investing activities in the statement of cash flows. At this stage, the management of the Group can not estimate the influence of the implementation of the standard on the financial statements of the Group. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1 2010.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amendments to IAS 36 Impairment of assets
|
|
|
(2)
|
Amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
|
|
|
(3)
|
Amendment to IAS 24, Related Party Disclosure;
|
|
|
(4)
|
Standards and Interpretations in issue not yet adopted and will have material affect on the Group's Financial Statements
|
|
|
·
|
IAS 17 (amendment) "Leases"
As part of Improvements to IFRSs (2009) issued in April 2009, the International Accounting Standards Board amended the requirements of IAS 17 Leases regarding the classification of leases of land. Prior to amendment, IAS 17 generally required leases of land with an indefinite useful life to be classified as operating leases. This was inconsistent with the general principles of the Standard, and the relevant guidance has been removed due to concerns that it could lead to accounting that did not reflect the substance of arrangements. Following the amendments, leases of land are classified as either ‘finance’ or ‘operating’ in accordance with the general principles of IAS 17. These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2010, and they are to be applied retrospectively to unexpired leases at 1 January 2010 if the necessary information was available at the inception of the lease. Otherwise, the revised Standard will be applied based on the facts and circumstances existing on 1 January 2010 (i.e. the date of adoption of the amendments). The Company entered into a long term lease agreement with the ILA with respect to a parcel of land which its facilities were constructed. The lease payments were paid in advance. The prepaid lease payments which were recognized in the balance sheet as "Prepaid Expenses" will be classified to "Fixed Assets".
|
|
|
A.
|
General
In the application of the Group’s accounting policies, which are described in Note 2, the management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
|
|
|
B.
|
Significant judgments in applying accounting policies
The following are the significant judgments, apart from those involving estimations (see below), that the management have made in the process of applying the entity’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in financial statements.
|
|
|
•
|
Revenue recognition - the Group has recognized in revenues amounted to NIS 303,460 thousands in the year ended December 31, 2009 (289,068 in the year ended December 31, 2008) for selling food products. The Group has given the buyers a right to return the product. According to the Group's estimations the rate of the products returns, based on the Group's past experience regarding similar transactions, will not be more than 1.7% of total revenues. As a result, the group recognized the revenues and created an accrual for customer's returns, at the same time. Any change of 1% in the Group's estimation will increase\ decrease the Group's revenues in the amount of NIS 3,035 thousands (NIS 2,891 thousands in the year ended December 31, 2008).
|
|
|
•
|
Useful lives of property, plant and equipment - the Group reviews the estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment at the end of each annual reporting period. There were no changes in the estimations of useful lives of property, plant and equipment in the current reporting period.
|
|
|
•
|
Impairment of goodwill - Determining whether goodwill is impaired requires an estimation by the management of the Company of the value in use of the cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated. The value in use calculation requires the management to estimate the future cash flows expected to arise from the cash-generating unit and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value.
The carrying amount of goodwill at the balance sheet date was NIS 1,936 thousand (USD 513 thousand), following disposal of Goodwill relating to a disposal of subsidiary in the amount of NIS 1,893 thousands (USD 501 thousand), an impairment loss in the amount of NIS 1,067 thousands recognized in the year ended December 31, 2008 and an impairment loss in the amount of NIS 3,054 thousands recognized in the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
•
|
Deferred taxes- the company recognizes deferred tax assets for all of the deductible temporary differences up to the amount as to which it is anticipated that there will be taxable income against which the temporary difference will be deductible. During each period, for purposes of calculation of the utilizable temporary difference, management uses estimates and approximations as a basis which it evaluates each period.
|
|
|
•
|
Measurement of obligation for employee benefits - The current value of the Group's post-employment benefits obligation is based on an actuarial estimation, using a large number of assumptions, including capitalization rate. Changes in the actuarial assumptions may affect the value of the Group's post-employment benefits obligations. The Group estimates the capitalization rate once in a year, based on the capitalization rate of government bonds. Other assumptions are determined based on market conditions and on the Group's past experience.
|
|
|
A.
|
Cash and cash equivalents - composition
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash in bank
|
4,687 | 6,611 | 1,242 | |||||||||
|
Short-term bank deposits
|
82,417 | 72,138 | 21,832 | |||||||||
|
Total cash
|
87,104 | 78,749 | 23,074 | |||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Other financial assets
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)
|
||||||||||||
|
Held for trading non-derivative financial assets
|
||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
2,546 | 882 | 674 | |||||||||
|
Governmental loan and other bonds
|
7,273 | 1,526 | 1,927 | |||||||||
|
Certificate of participation in mutual fund
|
1,537 | 6,959 | 407 | |||||||||
|
Derivatives
|
- | 77 | - | |||||||||
| 11,356 | 9,444 | 3,008 | ||||||||||
|
|
C.
|
Trade receivables
(1) Composition
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Trade receivables
|
79,029 | 80,757 | 20,935 | |||||||||
|
Less - allowance for doubtful debts
|
1,277 | 1,158 | 338 | |||||||||
| 77,752 | 79,599 | 20,597 | ||||||||||
|
|
C.
|
Trade receivables (Cont.)
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
0-120 days
|
547 | 587 | 145 | |||||||||
|
120-150 days
|
- | 137 | - | |||||||||
|
150 days and above
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
Total
|
547 | 724 | 145 | |||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at beginning of the year
|
1,158 | 2,682 | 306 | |||||||||
|
Increase relating to subsidiary consolidated for the first time
|
- | 164 | - | |||||||||
|
Amounts written off as uncollectible
|
(435 | ) | (2,482 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||||
|
Change in allowance doubtful debts
|
554 | 794 | 147 | |||||||||
|
Balance at end of the year
|
1,277 | 1,158 | 338 | |||||||||
|
|
D.
|
Other receivables
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
487 | 438 | 129 | |||||||||
|
Income receivables
|
- | 377 | - | |||||||||
|
Derivatives at fair value
|
- | 77 | - | |||||||||
|
Government authorities
|
1,072 | 613 | 284 | |||||||||
|
Advances to suppliers
|
229 | 597 | 61 | |||||||||
|
Others
|
202 | 1,758 | 53 | |||||||||
| 1,990 | 3,860 | 527 | ||||||||||
|
|
E.
|
Inventories
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Raw and auxiliary materials
|
1,479 | 2,573 | 392 | |||||||||
|
Finished products and goods in process
|
38,106 | 29,082 | 10,094 | |||||||||
| 39,585 | 31,655 | 10,486 | ||||||||||
|
Advances to suppliers
|
5,225 | 2,762 | 1,384 | |||||||||
| 44,810 | 34,417 | 11,870 | ||||||||||
|
|
A.
|
Consolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
Subsidiary
|
Location
|
Jurisdiction of Organization
|
Company's Ownership Interest
|
|||||||||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
|||||||||||
|
Gold Frost Ltd ("
Goldfrost
")
|
Israel
|
Israel
|
100.00 | % | 89.99 | % | ||||||
|
Shamir Salads (2006) Ltd ("
Shamir Salads
")
|
Israel
|
Israel
|
51.00 | % | 51.00 | % | ||||||
|
WF Kosher Food Distributors Ltd. ("
WF
")
|
USA
|
USA
|
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||
|
Y.L.W. Baron international trading Ltd. ("
Baron
")
|
Israel
|
Israel
|
- | 50.10 | % | |||||||
|
W.F.D. Ltd.
|
Israel
|
Israel
|
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||
|
Willi-food frozen products Ltd.
|
Israel
|
Israel
|
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||
|
Goldfrost's subsidiary
|
||||||||||||
|
Dairy distributor in Denmark ("
the Distributor
")
|
Denmark
|
Denmark
|
- | 51.00 | % | |||||||
|
Stock
Market
|
Value of Holdings
|
|||||
|
Subsidiary
|
December 31,
|
|||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
|||||
|
Gold Frost Ltd ("
Goldfrost
")
|
AIM
|
-
|
(*)16,098
|
|||
|
|
(*)
|
Goldfrost was traded in the London AIM exchange. In May 28, 2008 its shares were delisted. The Value of Holdings was calculated based on the price of the share in the last date of trading, meaning May 27, 2008 and based on the Representative exchange rate of the pound as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
B.
|
On July 27, 2009
the Company, announced that it has successfully completed its tender offer to purchase from the holders of shares and/or depositary interests of Goldfrost, all of the issued and outstanding share capital of Goldfrost not already held by the Company for a price of 7 pence per share or per depositary interest in cash. This tender offer was commenced on June 22, 2009.
|
|
|
C.
|
On June 2009, Goldfrost had signed an agreement to sell its 51% interest in the distributor to the Distributor and/or to the Distributor other shareholder ("
Other Shareholder
") for $400,000. Goldfrost acquired its 51% interest from the Other Shareholder in February 2008. According to the terms of the agreement, an amount equal to the balance of outstanding invoices owed by Goldfrost to the Distributor will be deducted as a downpayment, and the rest will be paid by deduction in the purchase price by a pre-determined amount for each shipment of goods that Goldfrost will purchase from the Distributor or from the Other Shareholder, and the balance of the consideration, if any, will be paid in April 2011.
Goldfrost was granted the exclusive right to distribute all of the products of the Distributor and the Other Shareholder in Israel until April 2012, so long as Goldfrost purchases a minimum quantity of products from the Distributor or from the Other Shareholder at fair market prices and that meet specified quality standards. As a result of the sale of the shares of the Distributor Goldfrost recognized a capital gain of NIS 1.2 million.
|
|
|
D.
|
On September 2, 2009
the Company had signed an agreement ("
Agreement
") to sell all of its holdings in Baron, kosher food exporters located in Israel, and to assign all of its rights and obligations under the Founders Agreement from February 2007 to a private company owned by the Baron Family, who hold, as of the date of the Agreement the remaining shares in Baron.
In exchange for the sale of shares and the assignment of rights and obligations, Baron Family agreed to pay US$ 937,500, which was paid to the Company on the date of execution of the Agreement. As a result of the sale of the shares of the Baron the Company recognized a capital loss of NIS 1.5 million.
|
|
Office
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Furniture,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Machinery
|
Computers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
and
|
Motor
|
Leasehold
|
and
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Building
|
equipment
|
vehicles
|
improvements
|
equipment
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - January 1, 2008
|
30,916 | 1,010 | 8,570 | - | 4,073 | 44,569 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes during 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additions
|
610 | 1,934 | 487 | 8 | 276 | 3,315 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Dispositions
|
- | - | (583 | ) | - | (265 | ) | (848 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Balances relating to subsidiary consolidated for the first time
|
- | 6,142 | 1,696 | 348 | 358 | 8,544 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange differences
|
- | - | (6 | ) | - | - | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - December 31, 2008
|
31,526 | 9,086 | 10,164 | 356 | 4,442 | 55,574 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes during 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additions
|
143 | 825 | 531 | 158 | 198 | 1,855 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Dispositions
|
- | - | (810 | ) | - | - | (810 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Balances relating to disposal of subsidiary
|
- | - | (149 | ) | - | (113 | ) | (262 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange differences
|
- | - | 7 | - | - | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - December 31, 2009
|
31,669 | 9,911 | 9,743 | 514 | 4,527 | 56,364 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated depreciation:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - January 1, 2008
|
842 | 64 | 5,047 | - | 2,402 | 8,355 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes during 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additions
|
1,420 | 763 | 1,362 | 36 | 621 | 4,202 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Dispositions
|
- | - | (304 | ) | - | (8 | ) | (312 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Balances relating to subsidiary consolidated for the first time
|
- | 830 | 251 | 2 | 129 | 1,212 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange differences
|
- | - | 10 | - | - | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance - December 31, 2008
|
2,262 | 1,657 | 6,366 | 38 | 3,144 | 13,467 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes during 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additions
|
1,428 | 936 | 1,216 | 35 | 580 | 4,195 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Dispositions
|
- | - | (619 | ) | - | - | (619 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Balances relating to disposal of subsidiary
|
- | - | (29 | ) | - | (35 | ) | (64 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Balance - December 31, 2009
|
3,690 | 2,593 | 6,934 | 73 | 3,689 | 16,979 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net book value:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2009
|
27,979 | 7,318 | 2,809 | 441 | 838 | 39,385 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2008
|
29,264 | 7,429 | 3,798 | 318 | 1,298 | 42,107 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net book value (Dollars in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2009
|
7,412 | 1,939 | 744 | 117 | 222 | 10,434 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
A.
|
Composition
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
7,985 | 4,884 | 2,115 | |||||||||
|
Additional amounts recognised from business combinations occurring during the year
|
- | 3,101 | - | |||||||||
|
Disposal of subsidiary
|
(2,960 | ) | - | (784 | ) | |||||||
|
Balance at end of year
|
5,025 | 7,985 | 1,331 | |||||||||
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
4,156 | 3,089 | 1,101 | |||||||||
|
Impairment losses recognized in the year
|
- | 1,067 | - | |||||||||
|
Disposal of subsidiary
|
(1,067 | ) | - | (283 | ) | |||||||
|
Balance at end of year
|
3,089 | 4,156 | 818 | |||||||||
|
Carrying amount
|
||||||||||||
|
At the beginning of the year
|
3,829 | 1,795 | 1,014 | |||||||||
|
At the end of the year
|
1,936 | 3,829 | 513 | |||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Annual test for impairment
During 2009, the Group assessed the recoverability of goodwill, and determined that there is no need of impairment in any of the cash-generating units. During 2008, the Group assessed the recoverability of goodwill, and determined that goodwill associated with the Group’s overseas marketing of refrigerated products activity was not recoverable and was written off in the amount of NIS 1,067 thousands.
|
|
|
C.
|
Allocation of goodwill to cash-generating units
Goodwill has been allocated for impairment testing purposes to the following cash-generating units:
|
|
|
•
|
Export activity (Baron that was acquired in the year 2007 and was sold in the year 2009).
|
|
|
•
|
Export activity (WF that was acquired in the year 2007).
|
|
|
•
|
Salad production and marketing activity
(Shamir Salads that was acquired in the year 2008).
|
|
|
•
|
Overseas marketing of refrigerated products activity (The distributor that was acquired in the year 2008 and was sold in the year 2009).
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Marketing activity of chilled and frozen products (Goldfrost)
|
36 | 36 | 10 | |||||||||
|
Export activity (Baron - sold in the year 2009)
|
- | 1,893 | - | |||||||||
|
Export activity (WF)
|
3,089 | 3,089 | 818 | |||||||||
|
Salad production and marketing activity (Shamir Salads)
|
1,900 | 1,900 | 503 | |||||||||
|
Overseas marketing of refrigerated products activity (the Distributor - sold in the year 2009)
|
- | 1,067 | - | |||||||||
|
|
(1)
|
The value of use estimate was conducted using the unleveraged cash flow capitalization method, with the projected cash flow deriving from the profit expectation of the activity with certain adjustments, based on the 2010 activity budget and the current status of activity, and without taking into account the future synergy potential with the Company's activity. Key assumptions in the cash flow projection:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Revenues - the assumption is that in the projection years, the activity revenues will grow at a rate of 2% per year, reflecting the activity's share of annual potential market growth as well as the growth in the extant of revenues from institutional bodies and from product exports. Growth is not contingent on capital investments that increase production capacity.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Gross profit - the assumption is that the gross profit rate will be 30% in the projected years (the same rate assumed in the 2010 budget).
|
|
|
(c)
|
Operational expenses - regarding selling expenses, a 100% expenditure flexibility rate was assumed relative to the yearly increase in revenues. Regarding administrative and general expenses, a 50% expenditure flexibility rate was assumed relative to the yearly increase in revenues, due to the fact that a significant portion of these expenses are fixed.
|
|
|
(d)
|
Tax - deducted according to the statutory tax rate.
|
|
|
(e)
|
Depreciation and investments - yearly depreciation of NIS 1.03 million was assumed for the projected years. It was also assumed that the accounting depreciation would be equal to the economic depreciation and therefore, according to the activity assumptions, investments would equal depreciation.
|
|
|
(f)
|
Working capital - for the purpose of the projection a normal capital rate of 9% of revenues was assumed, based on the working capital items, with the exception of suppliers, from the activity's financial statement of operations as of December 31 2009, and the suppliers' portion of revenues in accordance with the average for 2008-2009.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Long term growth rate - an average long term yearly growth rate of 1.7% was assumed, based on the average long term growth rate for the population according to the Central Bureau of Statistics.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Capital price - in order to estimate the capital price of the activity an estimate was made of the weighted capital cost (WACC), using the CAPM model to calculate equity capital prices based on comparison with public companies dealing in the area. The main parameters used for the purpose of estimating the proper equity capital cost for the activity - risk-free interest of 3.3%, specific risk premium (expressing the activity's specific risks, such as the shareholder dispute that impacts activity and prevents the creation of synergy with the Company, the fact that activity is more limited in comparison with the compared companies, the limited presence of activity in major retail chains), market premium - 6.5% (the average gap between the yearly market yield and the risk-free interest in the market), beta - 0.65 determined by studying companies similar in certain characteristics to the activity and which shares are traded on a continuous basis (no public companies with identical activity were found). Total cost of equity capital - 16.0%. To calculate the net debt price also used for the purposes of the WACC calculation, a debt price of 7.5% was assumed and a tax rate of 18%. Based on these calculations, using a debt ration worth 25%, taking into account the capital structure of the activity reflecting Management's future projections, and the capital structure of the comparison companies), the WACC received was 13.5%, and before tax - 16.6%.
|
|
|
A.
|
Composition:
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
||||||||||||
|
Suppliers relationship
|
- | 120 | - | |||||||||
|
Customers relationship
|
1,364 | 1,404 | 361 | |||||||||
|
Brand name
|
3,570 | 3,570 | 946 | |||||||||
|
technological know-how
|
439 | 439 | 116 | |||||||||
| 5,373 | 5,533 | 1,423 | ||||||||||
|
Accumulated amortization and impairment
|
||||||||||||
|
Suppliers relationship
|
- | 34 | - | |||||||||
|
Customers relationship
|
182 | 131 | 48 | |||||||||
|
Brand name
|
429 | 143 | 114 | |||||||||
|
technological know-how
|
88 | 44 | 23 | |||||||||
| 699 | 352 | 185 | ||||||||||
|
Amortized cost
|
4,674 | 5,181 | 1,238 | |||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Amortization rates -
see note 2J.
|
|
|
A.
|
Trade payables
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Open accounts
|
34,926 | 39,206 | 9,252 | |||||||||
|
Accrued expenses
|
641 | 832 | 170 | |||||||||
|
Checks payables
|
13,815 | 13,690 | 3,659 | |||||||||
| 49,382 | 53,728 | 13,081 | ||||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Other payables and accrued expenses
|
|
Government authorities
|
382 | 297 | 101 | |||||||||
|
Customer advances
|
451 | 169 | 120 | |||||||||
|
Deferred income
|
- | 346 | - | |||||||||
|
Related parties
|
5,774 | 1,690 | 1,530 | |||||||||
|
Accrued expenses
|
1,564 | 1,958 | 414 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
805 | 511 | 213 | |||||||||
| 8,976 | 4,971 | 2,378 | ||||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate
|
Current
|
Non-current
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
As of December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
annual
|
2 0 0 9 | 2 0 0 8 | 2 0 0 9 | 2 0 0 8 | 2 0 0 9 | 2 0 0 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
%
|
NIS in thousand
|
NIS in thousand
|
NIS in thousand
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Banks:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Overdraft
|
L+1/P+1-P+3.25
|
1,152 | 5,837 | - | - | 1,152 | 5,837 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CPI linked
|
- | 456 | - | - | - | 456 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In U.S dollars
|
L+1 | 1,324 | 3,296 | - | - | 1,324 | 3,296 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not linked
|
P+1.05-6.95
|
7,619 | 7,657 | 97 | - | 7,716 | 7,657 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Others:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CPI linked
|
277 | 316 | - | 267 | 277 | 583 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10,372 | 17,562 | 97 | 267 | 10,469 | 17,829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thousand NIS
|
||||
|
First year - Current portion
|
925 | |||
|
Second year
|
97 | |||
|
Total
|
1,022 | |||
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Vehicles
|
491 | 734 | 130 | |||||||||
| 491 | 734 | 130 | ||||||||||
|
Current
|
Non current
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 0 0 9 | 2 0 0 8 | 2 0 0 9 | 2 0 0 8 | 2 0 0 9 | 2 0 0 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Onerous contracts (*)
|
- | 3,500 | - | - | - | 3,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Legal claims
|
145 | 2,389 | - | 308 | 145 | 2,697 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total provisions
|
145 | 5,889 | - | 308 | 145 | 6,197 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Legal claims
|
Onerous contracts
|
Total provisions
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance at the beginning of year
2009
|
2,697 | 3,500 | 6,197 | |||||||||
|
Additional recognized provisions during the year
|
145 | - | 145 | |||||||||
|
Provisions payments/
closing
|
(2,845 | ) | (3,500 | ) | (6,345 | ) | ||||||
|
Increase related to passage of time - currency differences
|
148 | - | 148 | |||||||||
|
Balance at the end of year
2009
|
145 | - | 145 | |||||||||
|
|
1.
|
On November 24, 2003, Israeli Customs issued the Company and Gold Frost a notice for total payment of NIS 381 thousand claiming that the tariff on a certain product imported by the Company was erroneous. The Company and Gold Frost did not agree with such notice and on November 25, 2004 the Company and Gold Frost filed a lawsuit against the State of Israel to have the notice declared void. A reserve of NIS 308 thousand was included in the Company's 2008 financial statements for purposes of this tariff. On March 9, 2009, the court determined that the Company and GoldFrost are exempt of the payment, and therefore the Company had canceled the abovementioned reserve in the financial statements.
|
|
|
2.
|
In or about October, 2005, Vitarroz Corp. commenced an action in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, against Willi USA Holdings, Inc. (a subsidiary of the Company), the Company and Zwi Williger (collectively, the "Defendants") due to a dispute concerning a press release announcing the termination of the proposed acquisition of the Vitarroz business by the Company. On August 25, 2008, an arbitration panel granted an award against the Company in the amount of approximately USD 0.6 million. Among other things, the panel found that the press release issued by the Company announcing the termination of the proposed acquisition of the Vitarroz business by the Company constituted a breach of contract and violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In addition, the panel rejected the Company's counterclaims. On October 13, 2008, the Company filed a motion to the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey New to vacate the award. A reserve on the full award was included in the Company's 2008 financial statements. The motion that the Company filed was denied and on August 19, 2009 the Company paid the amount of USD 0.6 million.
|
|
|
3.
|
On February 13 2007, a suit was filed against the Company, in which a financial remedy was requested in the amount of NIS 144,543 due to the violation of a distribution agreement and the illicit collection of payments. Over the course of 2007, a statement of defense and a response were filed, and preliminary proceedings were carried out. In addition, pre-trial hearings were held in which the Court instructed the parties to conclude their pre-trial proceedings and a date was set to file affidavits. In 2008, after the affidavits were filed, pre-trial hearings were held, in which the plaintiffs were given the opportunity to file a supplement to an opinion they submitted before November 5, 2008, and the defendant was given an opportunity for completion 30 days later. Inquiries in the case were completed and dates were set for the filing of affidavits. On September 6, 2009, both the plaintiffs and the Company filed their summations. The Company's legal counsel estimate that the Company has a reasonable chance to defend itself, but at the same time, the Company's legal counsel believe their opinion is conditional in light of the inquiries conducted for the case and in light of the court's remarks regarding the failure to disclose the entirety of the relevant documents. Therefore, the Company estimates that there is a chance the court will accept the plaintiff's claim, and therefore the Company's financial statements include a provision for the entire sum of the claim.
|
|
|
4.
|
On October 12 2008 a suit was filed against the Company, claiming that the Company had used container transportation services and had yet to pay the costs for this service. The plaintiff claims that as of the suit's filing date, the container had not been released from the port and demands that the Company pay the fees associated with the delay. In addition, the plaintiff claims that the Company holds additional debts due to delays and transportation fee differentials pertaining to various of the Company's shipments. The total sum of the claim is NIS 82,174. The Company's Financial Statements for the year ending December 31 2008 included a provision for this suit to the amount of NIS 142 thousand, a provision that includes additional expenses pertaining to this container as of the end of the reported period.
|
|
|
5.
|
In 2008 the Group recognized a provision for cumbrous contracts due to the purchase of imported merchandise at the level of the loss that would be created from the sale of this merchandise. This matter was resolved in 2009 after no obligation to purchase merchandise and/or merchandise remained from which losses were expected from their sale.
|
|
|
A.
|
Composition
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Post Employment Benefits:
|
||||||||||||
|
Benefits to retirees
|
1,044 | 994 | 277 | |||||||||
|
Short term employee benefits:
|
||||||||||||
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses
|
2,126 | 1,989 | 563 | |||||||||
|
Short term absence compensation
|
851 | 555 | 226 | |||||||||
| 2,977 | 2,544 | 788 | ||||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Defined benefit plans
|
|
Valuation at
|
||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
|||||||
|
Discount rate
|
4.6%-4.8 | % | 4.2%-4.7 | % | ||||
|
Expected return on the plan assets
|
2.6%-4.8 | % | 1.75%-4.7 | % | ||||
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
4 | % | 4 | % | ||||
|
Expected rate of termination:
|
||||||||
|
0-1 years
|
35%-60 | % | 35%-60 | % | ||||
|
1-2 years
|
30 | % | 30 | % | ||||
|
2-3 years
|
20 | % | 20 | % | ||||
|
3-4 years
|
10%-15 | % | 10%-15 | % | ||||
|
4-5 years
|
10 | % | 10 | % | ||||
|
5 years and more
|
7.5 | % | 7.5 | % | ||||
|
|
B.
|
Defined benefit plans (Cont.)
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Current service cost
|
1,102 | 961 | 292 | |||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
134 | 126 | 35 | |||||||||
|
Expected return on the plan assets
|
(106 | ) | (111 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||
|
Employer contribution
|
(948 | ) | (841 | ) | (251 | ) | ||||||
|
Interest losses on severance payment allocated to remuneration benefits
|
23 | 25 | 6 | |||||||||
|
Actuarial losses (gains) recognized in the year
|
(35 | ) | 478 | (9 | ) | |||||||
|
Benefit paid during the year
|
(120 | ) | (93 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||
| 50 | 545 | 13 | ||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cost of sales
|
62 | 155 | - | 16 | ||||||||||||
|
Selling expenses
|
(5 | ) | 224 | (60 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
(7 | ) | 166 | (62 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
| 50 | 545 | (122 | ) | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Opening defined benefit obligation
|
2,806 | 1,521 | 743 | |||||||||
|
Current service cost
|
1,102 | 961 | 292 | |||||||||
|
Interest cost
|
134 | 126 | 35 | |||||||||
|
Actuarial gains (losses)
|
211 | (138 | ) | 56 | ||||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(475 | ) | (268 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||
|
Change relating to subsidiary consolidated for the first time
|
- | 604 | - | |||||||||
|
Closing defined benefit obligation
|
3,778 | 2,806 | 1,001 | |||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Defined benefit plans (Cont.)
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Opening defined benefit assets
|
1,812 | 1,358 | 480 | |||||||||
|
Expected return on the plan assets
|
106 | 111 | 28 | |||||||||
|
Actuarial gains (losses)
|
246 | (616 | ) | 65 | ||||||||
|
Employer contribution
|
948 | 841 | 251 | |||||||||
|
Benefits paid
|
(355 | ) | (175 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||||
|
Acquisition of subsidiary consolidated for the first time
|
- | 318 | - | |||||||||
|
Interest losses on severance payment allocated to remuneration benefits
|
(23 | ) | (25 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
|
Closing defined benefit assets
|
2,734 | 1,812 | 724 | |||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Present value of funded liability
|
3,778 | 2,806 | 1,001 | |||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets - accumulated deposit in executive insurance
|
2,734 | 1,812 | 724 | |||||||||
|
Net liability deriving from defined benefit obligation
|
1,044 | 994 | 277 | |||||||||
|
|
Actual
return
on the plan's assets and compensation rights:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan's assets
|
106 | 111 | 28 | |||||||||
|
Actuarial gains (losses)
|
246 | (615 | ) | 65 | ||||||||
|
Actual return on plan's assets
|
352 | (504 | ) | 93 | ||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Defined benefit plans (Cont.)
Comparison to previous years:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Present value of obligation due to defined benefit plan
|
3,778 | 2,806 | 1,521 | 1,001 | ||||||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
2,734 | 1,812 | 1,358 | 724 | ||||||||||||
|
Plan deficit
|
1,044 | 994 | 163 | 277 | ||||||||||||
|
|
C
.
|
Short term employee benefits
|
|
|
1.
|
Composition:
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
Dollars
|
||||||||||
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses
|
2,126 | 1,989 | 563 | |||||||||
|
Short term absence compensation
|
851 | 555 | 225 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
2,977 | 2,544 | 788 | |||||||||
|
|
2.
|
Additional information:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Paid Vacation Days
In accordance with the Yearly vacation Law, 1951, Company employees are entitled to a number of paid vacation days for each year of work. In accordance with the law in question (and addition as set in personal agreements between the Company and several of its employees), the number of yearly work days to which each employee is entitled is established based on said employee's seniority.
The employee may use vacation days based on his needs and with the Company’s consent, and to accrue the remainder of unused vacation days. Employees who have discontinued their employment without using the balance of their vacation days are entitled to payment for the vacation days in question.
The balance of the Group's vacation provision is in accordance with the vacation eligibility of each individual employee, according to the personal agreement between each employee and the company to which they belong, and in accordance with the employee's salary. The balance of the Group's vacation provision as of December 31 2009 is NIS 851 thousand (NIS 555 thousand as of December 31 2008).
|
|
|
(b)
|
Paid Sick Days
In accordance with the Sick Pay Law, 1976, Company employees are entitled to 18 sick days a year (a day and a half per month). Sick days are deducted only upon receipt of medical confirmation of an employee's illness. Employees who have discontinued their employment without using the balance of their sick days shall not be entitled to payment for the balance of sick days in question, and therefore such a provision is not listed in the Company's books.
|
|
|
A.
|
Composition
|
|
Year ended December 31
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Current taxes
|
5,568 | 1,622 | 2,945 | 1,475 | ||||||||||||
|
Taxes in respect of prior years
|
(1,264 | ) | - | (338 | ) | (335 | ) | |||||||||
|
Deferred taxes (C. below)
|
739 | (505 | ) | (433 | ) | 196 | ||||||||||
| 5,043 | 1,117 | 2,174 | 1,336 | |||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
34,643 | 4,880 | 15,561 | 9,177 | ||||||||||||
|
Statutory tax rate
|
26 | % | 27 | % | 29 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||
|
Tax computed by statutory tax
rate
|
9,007 | 1,318 | 4,513 | 2,386 | ||||||||||||
|
Tax increments (savings) due to:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
304 | 1,180 | 130 | 81 | ||||||||||||
|
Deferred tax in respect of losses for which valuation allowance was provided
|
- | 1,110 | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
Tax exempt income
|
(1,763 | ) | (367 | ) | (182 | ) | (467 | ) | ||||||||
|
Permanent differences
|
35 | 36 | - | 9 | ||||||||||||
|
Temporary differences for which deferred taxes were not provided
|
(910 | ) | (1,977 | ) | (535 | ) | (241 | ) | ||||||||
|
Effect of decrease in tax rate on deferred taxes assets
|
19 | 5 | (13 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||
|
Differences in the definition of capital and non-monetary items for tax purposes and financial reporting purposes
|
(23 | ) | (22 | ) | (1,227 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||
|
Previous year taxes
|
(1,264 | ) | - | (338 | ) | (335 | ) | |||||||||
|
Other
|
(362 | ) | (166 | ) | (174 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||
| 5,043 | 1,117 | 2,174 | 1,336 | |||||||||||||
|
|
C.
|
Deferred Taxes
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9(*) | ||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Balance as of beginning of year
|
669 | 238 | 177 | |||||||||
|
Charged to the consolidated income statements
|
(720 | ) | 510 | (190 | ) | |||||||
|
Tax rate changes
|
(19 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||
|
Change relating to subsidiary consolidated for
the first time
|
- | (74 | ) | - | ||||||||
|
Balance as of end of year
|
(70 | ) | 669 | (18 | ) | |||||||
|
Deferred taxes arise from the following:
|
||||||||||||
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
319 | 294 | 85 | |||||||||
|
Employees benefits
|
557 | 391 | 148 | |||||||||
|
Carry forward tax losses
|
- | 747 | - | |||||||||
|
Depreciable fixed assets
|
(985 | ) | (893 | ) | (261 | ) | ||||||
|
Financial assets carried at fair value through profit
or loss
|
39 | 130 | 10 | |||||||||
| (70 | ) | 669 | (18 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
D.
|
Reduction of Corporate Tax Rates
In July 2005, the Israeli Knesset passed the Law for Amending the Income Tax Ordinance (No. 147), 2005, according to which commencing in 2006 the corporate income-tax rate would be gradually reduced, for which a 31% tax rate was established, through 2010, in respect of which a 25% tax rate was established.
On July 23, 2009, the Knesset passed the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislation Amendments for
Implementation of the 2009 and 2010 Economic Plan) - 2009, which provided, inter-alia, an additional
gradual reduction in the company tax rate to 18% as from the 2016 tax year. In accordance with the aforementioned amendments, the company tax rates applicable as from the 2009 tax year are as follows: in the 2009 tax year- 26%, in the 2010 tax year- 25%, in the 2011 tax year - 24%, in the 2012 tax year - 23%, in the 2013 tax year- 22%, in the 2014 tax year - 21%, in the 2015 tax year - 20% and as from the 2016 tax year the company tax rate will be 18%. The aforementioned change in the tax rates had no material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
|
|
|
E.
|
The Company and its subsidiaries were not assessed for Income Taxes. According to section 145 of the Tax Ordinance assessments for the years 2004 and backward are considered final.
|
|
|
F.
|
On February 26, 2008, the Knesset ratified the third reading of the Income Tax Law ("Inflation Adjustments") (Amendment 20) (Limitation of Term of Validity) - 2008 (hereinafter: "The Amendment"), pursuant to which the application of the inflationary adjustment law was terminated in tax year 2007 and as of tax year 2008, the law is no longer apply, other than transition regulations whose intention is to prevent distortions in tax calculations.
According to the amendment, in tax year 2008 and thereafter, the adjustment of revenues for tax purposes is no longer be considered a real-term basis for measurement. Moreover, the linkage to the CPI of the depreciated sums of fixed assets and carryover losses for tax purposes was discontinued, in a manner whereby these sums was adjusted until the CPI at the end of 2007 and their linkage to the CPI was end as of that date.
|
|
|
(1)
|
The Company has agreed to pay the large supermarket retail chains in the organized market and to cretin of the customers in the private sector incentives calculated as a fixed percentage of the annual sales to such customer or incentives based on the increase in volume of sales to such customers in excess of a certain agreed amount with respect to the year 2009. The extent of such incentives varies between 0.5%-7.5% of the annual sales turnover of each relevant customer (depending on the agreement with each customer) and are usually awarded as part of a written annual framework agreement.
|
|
|
(2)
|
As of June 1, 1998, the Company entered into certain management services agreements with certain companies controlled by each of Messrs. Joseph and Zwi Williger, respectively (collectively, the “Williger Management Companies”), pursuant to which Messrs. Joseph and Zwi Williger are to provide management services on behalf of the Williger Management Companies to the Company (the “Management Services Agreements”).
The Management Services Agreements were for a period of four years commencing on June 1, 1998 (the “Management Services Period”), were automatically renewed on June 1, 2002 for two years and were automatically renewed for an additional period of two years in June 2004.
Each of the Management Services Agreements provided for monthly services fees equal to $24,500 (excluding VAT) and an annual bonus at a rate of 3% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax annual profits, if such profits are equal to or less than NIS 3.0 million (approximately USD 0.8 million), or at a rate of 5% if such profits exceed such level.
On May 4, 2005 the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors decided to amend the terms of the abovementioned agreements, mainly extending the management services period for an unlimited period, with an option to terminate them by the Company’s advance notice of 18 months and the Management Companies’ advance notice of 180 days. The General Meeting of the Company’s shareholders ratified these amendments on July 20, 2005.
On February 15, 2006 the Company’s board of directors resolved, in light of the expressed position of the Israeli Securities Authority, to set those agreements for a five-year period following ratification by the Company’s shareholders General Meeting, i.e., until July 19, 2010.
On January 2, 2008 the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors unanimously approved the amendment of the Management Services Agreements with Messrs. Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger. In accordance to the new Management Services Agreements the terms were amended as follows:
|
|
|
(a)
|
The current monthly services fees according to the Management Services Agreements will cease to be linked to the US Dollar and will be translated to NIS 102,900 (excluding VAT) linked to changes in the Israeli consumer price index.
|
|
|
(b)
|
The terms of the Management Services Agreements are to be extended indefinitely, subject to clause (3) below; provided however that in the event the Williger Management Company provides the management services to the Company without the presence of Messrs. Zwi Williger or Joseph Williger, as the case may be, and/or in the case of the death and/or permanent disability of Messrs. Zwi Williger or Joseph Williger, the Company will be entitled to terminate the Management Services Agreement immediately.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Cont.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Each of the parties to the Management Services Agreements may terminate the agreement at any time, and for any reason, by prior written notice which will be delivered to the other party as follows:
The Company may terminate the agreement at any time, and for any reason, by prior written notice of at least 36 months.
The Williger Management Company may terminate the agreement at any time, by prior written notice of at least 180 days.
|
|
|
(d)
|
If a Williger Management Company is to terminate the Management Services Agreement, the Williger Management Company would be entitled to receive the management fees for a period of twelve (12) months, which would begin after the prior notice period, whether or not it provides the Company with any management services during such twelve-month period.
In addition, the Management Services Agreements contain provisions entitling each of Messrs. Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger to 30 vacation days per year, during which days the applicable Williger Management Company will not provide management services to the Company. Unused vacation days may be accumulated and paid for in lieu of taking such days as vacation.
|
|
|
(3)
|
On April 1, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement to provide the Parent Company administrative services pursuant to which the Company may provide office facilities leased by the parent company for a monthly fee of NIS 5,480 (USD 1,452) to be adjusted annually for changes in the Israeli CPI.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
The Company does not generally enter into written agency or other agreements with its suppliers. However, the Company has written agreements with eighteen foreign suppliers that confirm the exclusive appointment of the Company as the sole agent and/or distributor of such suppliers either with respect to a specific product or with respect to a line of products, within the State of Israel.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Shamir Salads signed distribution agreements with 25 distributors, that distributes Shamir Salads products all over Israel for a commission that range between 6% to 16% of the distributor sales, depending of the customer. Shamir Salads has no commitment to any of those distributors for ongoing relationship.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Shamir Salads leases two joined buildings for its operation (factory, logistics and head office) - the first is 2,516 squared meters, the monthly rent is NIS 40,432 (linked to the CPI from December 2005) and the lease ends on January 2012. The second is 2,192 squared meters, the monthly rent is NIS 41,141 (linked to the CPI from December 2005) and the lease ends on January 2012.
In addition to these two joined buildings, Shamir Salads leases cooling chambers and offices located in Beer-Sheva and in Miluot.
|
|
|
(B)
|
Contingent liabilities
|
|
|
(1)
|
On November 24, 2003, Israeli Customs issued the Company and Gold Frost a notice for total payment of NIS 381 thousand claiming that the tariff on a certain product imported by the Company was erroneous. The Company and Gold Frost did not agree with such notice and on November 25, 2004 the Company and Gold Frost filed a lawsuit against the State of Israel to have the notice declared void. A reserve of NIS 308 thousand was included in the Company's 2008 financial statements for purposes of this tariff. On March 9, 2009, the court determined that the Company and GoldFrost are exempt of the payment, and therefore the Company had canceled the abovementioned reserve in the financial statements.
|
|
|
(2)
|
In or about October, 2005, Vitarroz Corp. commenced an action in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, against Willi USA Holdings, Inc. (a subsidiary of the Company), the Company and Zwi Williger (collectively, the "Defendants") due to a dispute concerning a press release announcing the termination of the proposed acquisition of the Vitarroz business by the Company. On August 25, 2008, an arbitration panel granted an award against the Company in the amount of approximately USD 0.6 million. Among other things, the panel found that the press release issued by the Company announcing the termination of the proposed acquisition of the Vitarroz business by the Company constituted a breach of contract and violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In addition, the panel rejected the Company's counterclaims. On October 13, 2008, the Company filed a motion to the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey New to vacate the award. A reserve on the full award was included in the Company's 2008 financial statements. The motion that the Company filed was denied and on August 19, 2009 the Company paid the amount of USD 0.6 million.
|
|
|
(3)
|
On February 13 2007, a suit was filed against the Company, in which a financial remedy was requested in the amount of NIS 144,543 due to the violation of a distribution agreement and the illicit collection of payments. Over the course of 2007, a statement of defense and a response were filed, and preliminary proceedings were carried out. In addition, pre-trial hearings were held in which the Court instructed the parties to conclude their pre-trial proceedings and a date was set to file affidavits. In 2008, after the affidavits were filed, pre-trial hearings were held, in which the plaintiffs were given the opportunity to file a supplement to an opinion they submitted before November 5, 2008, and the defendant was given an opportunity for completion 30 days later. Inquiries in the case were completed and dates were set for the filing of affidavits. On September 6, 2009, both the plaintiffs and the Company filed their summations. The Company's legal counsel estimate that the Company has a reasonable chance to defend itself, but at the same time, the Company's legal counsel believe their opinion is conditional in light of the inquiries conducted for the case and in light of the court's remarks regarding the failure to disclose the entirety of the relevant documents. Therefore, the Company estimates that there is a chance the court will accept the plaintiff's claim, and therefore the Company's financial statements include a provision for the entire sum of the claim.
|
|
|
(4)
|
On February 21, 2007, a lawsuit was filed against Gold Frost by Cukierman & Co. Investment House Ltd. in the Tel Aviv-Jaffa Magistrates Court in the amount of NIS 273,852, claiming non payment of fees for professional services rendered. A statement of defense was filed. Given the early stage of these proceedings, the Company is unable at this point to assess the risks involved.
|
|
|
(5)
|
In September 2007, Thurgeman Construction Co. Ltd. ("Thurgeman") filed a claim against the Company in the District Court of Tel Aviv for the amount of NIS 4,449,340 (plus VAT) (USD 1,170,263) regarding a dispute in connection with the construction of the Company's logistics center in Yavne (the "Project") pursuant to a contract between the parties, dated as of September 9, 2005. Under the terms of the contract, Thurgeman was to serve as the operating contractor for the construction of the frame and the surrounding portions for the construction of the Project.
|
|
|
(B)
|
Contingent liabilities (Cont.)
|
|
|
(5)
|
(cont.)
During the course of construction on the Project, the parties raised several claims against each other in connection with the progress of construction on the Project. The Company claimed that Thurgeman grossly violated the terms of the contract by continuous delays in the completion of the Project, and by performing the construction work in a negligent and unprofessional manner and with inferior quality. Thurgeman counterclaimed that it performed the construction work according to the terms of the contract and that any delays in the work were not caused through any fault of Thurgeman. Furthermore, Thurgeman claimed that the Company withheld certain payments to which Thurgeman was entitled for additional work on the Project, causing Thurgeman damages.
At the end of November 2007, the Company filed a statement of defense, which included a counterclaim against Thurgeman and its executive, Dotan Thurgeman, which contained among other things, a claim of defamation, a claim for damages caused by the delay in delivery of the completed Project, and damages caused by Thurgeman's poor and careless work on the Project. The sum of the damages claimed by the Company in the counterclaim was NIS 5 million (USD 1.3 million). In February 2008, Thurgeman filed a response to the counter claim. The parties started performing the preliminary proceedings. At the end of November 2008, after the Plaintiff failed to provide responses to the Company's preliminary motions, the Company filed a motion for preliminary orders. When no response was filed, the Company filed a motion for a ruling in absence of a response. On February 17 2009 the first pre-trial proceedings took place in which the Court proposed appointing an expert to resolve the dispute regarding professional issues pertaining to the construction of the Company's logistics center. The parties accepted the proposal. In mid-March 2009, the Company informed the Court that it insists that its requests for preliminary orders be resolved on the matter of questionnaires. The motion in question was discussed in the pre-trial proceedings held on December 29 2009, in which the Court accepted the Company's motion and compelled the Plaintiff to provide the Company with answers to all the questions mentioned in the motion. In addition, the Court instructed the parties to file their initial affidavits and opinions and appointed a court-appointed expert. The plaintiff is expected to file initial affidavits and its opinion by the end of March 2010. The plaintiff has filed initial affidavits and its opinion in March 2010. The Company intends to file initial affidavits and its opinion by the beginning of July 2010. Additional pre-trial proceedings were set for the beginning of September 2010.
At the current preliminary stage of the dispute, the Company's management and legal counsel cannot assess the chances of the parties.
|
|
|
(6)
|
On June 18, 2006, the Company filed a claim against Filiz and Ash-Bar in the amount of NIS 4,473,878 (USD 1,185,133) for breach of contract. The complaint was served on Filiz and Ash-Bar through Ash-Bar's chief executive officer. Filiz then filed a request to cancel the complaint, claiming that Ash-Bar is not authorized to accept service of process on its behalf. The request was denied by the court's registrar.
On November 4, 2007, Filiz filed an appeal of the registrar's decision and requested an extension for filing its defense to the complaint pending a decision on the appeal. The appeal was denied and the service of process was accepted by the court.
Notwithstanding the fact that the proceedings are still at a preliminary stage, the Company's legal counsel believes that the complaint is based on sound legal arguments, and that there is a reasonable possibility that a not insignificant portion of the arguments will be sustained by the court.
|
|
|
(B)
|
Contingent liabilities (Cont.)
|
|
|
(7)
|
On July 7, 2008, WF filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Country of New York, against Laish Israeli Food Ltd., Laish Dairy Ltd., 860 Nostrand Associates Llc., Arie Steiner, Eli Biran (WF's former CEO) and others. The plaintiffs assert claims, inter alia, of fraud, conversion and breach of contract against the seller and former principal of Laish Israeli Food and related parties. Certain defendants have filed motions to dismiss the claim. On August 27, 2008, 860 Nostrand Associates LLC. Filed a lawsuit against the Company, in the amount of USD
142,949
claiming that the defendant is liable to it as a guarantor of a certain lease that was allegedly signed by WF. Damages are being sought. The discovery process in the proceedings has commenced and is ongoing. Limited discovery remains to be completed before the hearing which is not scheduled yet.
|
|
|
(8)
|
On September 22, 2008, a lawsuit was filed against the Company, WF and one of the Company's officers by several WF's Israeli vendors in the Tel Aviv-Jaffa Magistrates Court in the amount of NIS 1,349,899 (USD 357,589), claiming nonpayment of WF for food products that they allegedly supplied to WF. A statement of defense was filed. A pre-trial hearing was held on September 15, 2009, following which the plaintiff filed a request for an appeal of the decision not to recognize a delivery made in Israel as a delivery to WF, as well as a request to permit production to WF outside the Court's jurisdiction. Deliberations regarding the matter of production to WF were returned to the Magistrate's Court, which instructed the plaintiffs to file a proper motion on this issue. Even at the early stage of these proceedings, the Company's management and legal counsel believe that the lawsuit against Company and the Company's officer are without merit, and they intend to vigorously defend against such claims. The amount of the claim is included in WF's financial statements under trade payables item.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Arbitration filed against Shamir Salads on the matter of a failure to pay NIS 50,000 plus tax which Shamir Salads was purportedly required to pay the plaintiff in accordance with an agreement dated April 10, 2008 signed between the parties. The plaintiff filed a statement of claim in the amount of NIS 1,873,000 before tax, and Shamir Salads filed a statement of defense and a countersuit in which it demanded that the plaintiff refund it for all sums received from it in the amount of NIS 514,934 as well as pay Shamir Salads compensation in the amount of NIS 6,246,886. The plaintiff filed a statement of defense for the countersuit as well as a response to Shamir Salads's statement of defense, and Shamir Salads also filed a response to the statement of defense to the countersuit. The parties filed initial affidavits, followed by a deposition, in which the parties' witnesses were examined. In the latest deposition, Shamir Salads sought to attach additional evidence it claims could clarify and shed light both on the concealment of facts by the plaintiffs before entering the agreement, and on the interests affecting one of the arbitration's witnesses. This motion was accepted. The parties filed summations and responses to the summations and received a ruling from the arbitrator on March 16, 2010. The sum of the claim is listed in Shamir Salads's books as a liability. According to the arbitrator's ruling, Shamir Salads is required to pay the plaintiff the amount of approximately NIS 392,000, which was paid on April 7, 2010.
|
|
|
(10)
|
On April 16, 2009, the Company was served with a purported class action lawsuit alleging that it misled its customers by illegally marking a product that the Company imports and sells as “sugar free”, according to the Israeli Consumer Protection Law, 1981. The groups which the lawsuit desires to represent include any Israeli resident who bought this product due to such person’s preference for a sugar free or a reduced sugar product (the “Group”). According to the plaintiff, the Group consists of 2,000 customers. The plaintiff appraises its own damages at NIS 2,000 (approximately US$510) and the damages of the entire Group to be NIS 4 million (approximately US$1 million).
On October 12, 2009, a preliminary hearing was held. In the hearing, the judge mentioned to the plaintiff’s attorney that the lawsuit does not meet a procedure of a purported class action and asked both parties to reach a settlement within 30 days. The Company received an offer from the plaintiff attorney to settle the lawsuit for NIS 30,000 (approximately US$8,000). We rejected the offer and the matter is yet to be resolved.
|
|
|
(B)
|
Contingent liabilities (Cont.)
|
|
|
(11)
|
On May 14, 2009, the Company received from the Sellers of Shamir Salads (the "Sellers") a notice cancelling the acquisition agreement of Shamir Salads (the "Shamir agreement"), and on May 18, 2009, the Company was notified of unilateral actions taken by the Sellers with respect to a change in Shamir Salads's board composition and signatory rights and replacement of the articles of association of Shamir Salads in an effort by the Sellers to deprive the Company of its board representation and signatory rights in Shamir Salads.
The Company submitted an urgent application to the district court of Tel Aviv requesting, among other things, a declaratory judgment that the Agreement is in full force and effect and various injunctions against the Sellers. The court issued injunction providing that the Sellers are prohibited from taking any action not in accordance with the signatory rights in Shamir Salads in effect prior to May 18, 2009, performing any disposition of the shares of Shamir Salads held by the Company, taking any action not in accordance with the articles of association of Shamir Salads as in effect prior to May 18, 2009, and/or interfering with the functions of Shamir Salads's board of directors as composed prior to May 18, 2009. In addition, pursuant to the injunction, the Sellers are prohibited from interfering with the functions of the co-CEO of Shamir Salads nominated by the Company and/or from preventing the deputy CFO of Shamir Salads from participating in the discussions to approve the financial statements of Shamir Salads.
On June 17, 2009, the Sellers filed a petition with the district court in Tel Aviv for temporary relief against the Company and others, a declaratory judgment and other relief in connection with an alleged fundamental breach by the Company of the Shamir Agreement, and for the return of the shares in Shamir Salads and the consideration paid therefore. In a hearing which took place on June 22, 2009, the parties agreed (i) to suspend the court proceedings between the parties, (ii) to appoint an arbitrator in all aspects of the dispute, (iii) to hear the claims of both parties arising from the dispute, and (iv) that the application for temporary relief filed by the Sellers be removed. The temporary injunction against the Sellers will remain in effect until the end of the arbitration proceedings. In the framework of these proceedings, the Company submitted a claim for declaratory relief pursuant to which the Seller’s notice of cancellation of the Shamir Agreement was given unlawfully and is void, as well as for an advance that was paid in excess and of additional damages that was caused to the Company in the amount of approximately NIS 3.9 million (USD 1.0 million). On August 4, 2009, the Sellers submitted a counterclaim against the Company and others for declaratory orders determined in proceedings that were submitted to the court, as well as for payment to Sellers of a sum of NIS 6.97 million (USD 1.8 million) for non-payment of the consideration in the Shamir Agreement and tarnishing the Sellers’ reputation and good name, and a sum of NIS 3.5 million (USD 0.9 million) to Shamir Salads for damages that the Company allegedly caused to Shamir Salads and its reputation, as well as a petition to split relief. Claims for additional relief against additional defendants (but not including the Company) were also included in the framework of the claim. The evidentiary stage of the arbitration proceedings commenced on November 3, 2009. On November 15, 2009, the Sellers allegedly filed a complaint with the Israeli police against the Williger Brothers as well as against other members of the Company's management team and against the legal counsel representing the Company. The complaint was not filed against the Company. On December 24, 2009 the sellers submitted a request, which was accepted, to correct its statement of claim. On January 18, 2010, the Israeli police wrote that after its investigation of the claim by the Sellers, it would not proceed with any criminal charges against the Company, Zwi Williger, Joseph Williger, Gil Hochboim and others. On January 27, 2010, the Company submitted an amended statement of defense. On February 28, 2010, the Sellers submitted an amended statement of reply. Hearings regarding the arbitration took place in November and December 2009 and further hearings will take place during 2010. The Company, based on the opinion of its legal counsel, believes that the plaintiffs' likelihood of success in the proceedings is low and the Company's success in the proceedings is higher than 50 percent.
|
|
As previously reported
|
Modification
|
As reported in current statements
|
||||||||||
|
As of December 31,
2008
|
||||||||||||
|
Other receivables
|
3,987 | (127 | ) | 3,860 | ||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
12,539 | 127 | 12,666 | |||||||||
|
Ordinary shares
|
||||||||
|
of NIS 0.1 par value each
|
||||||||
|
December 31
|
||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
|||||||
|
Authorized share capital
|
50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||||||
|
Issued and outstanding
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||
|
Number of options
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Number of options
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
Number of options
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|||||||||||||
|
(NIS)
|
(NIS)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Balance at the beginning of the year
|
19,000 | 14.04 | 27,000 | 13.43 | ||||||||||||
|
Granted
|
135,000 | 11.5 | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
Exercised
|
7,000 | 13.53 | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
Forfeited
|
12,000 | - | 8,000 | - | ||||||||||||
|
Balance at the end of the year
|
135,000 | 10.73 | 19,000 | 14.04 | ||||||||||||
|
Options exercisable at the year end
|
- | - | 19,000 | 14.04 | ||||||||||||
|
|
A.
|
Revenues
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Sale of products manufactured by the group
|
73,596 | 70,248 | - | 19,496 | ||||||||||||
|
Sale of other products
|
229,786 | 218,625 | 201,617 | 60,871 | ||||||||||||
|
Income from services provided
|
62 | 52 | - | 16 | ||||||||||||
|
Commissions
|
16 | 143 | - | 4 | ||||||||||||
| 303,460 | 289,068 | 201,617 | 80,387 | |||||||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Cost of sales
|
|
Purchases
|
200,351 | 198,787 | 154,087 | 53,073 | ||||||||||||
|
Materials consumed
|
10,076 | 9,123 | - | 2,669 | ||||||||||||
|
Salaries and related expenses
|
6,205 | 5,673 | - | 1,644 | ||||||||||||
|
Loss on firmly committed orders
|
(3,500 | ) | 3,500 | - | (927 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Transportation
|
1,874 | 2,031 | 1,511 | 496 | ||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,724 | 2,567 | 963 | 722 | ||||||||||||
|
Maintenance and rent
|
7,805 | 7,911 | 3,208 | 2,067 | ||||||||||||
|
Other manufacturing costs and expenses
|
2,518 | 2,169 | 2,273 | 667 | ||||||||||||
| 228,053 | 231,761 | 162,042 | 60,411 | |||||||||||||
|
Change in raw materials
|
1,094 | (986 | ) | - | 290 | |||||||||||
|
Change in finished goods and in goods in process
|
(9,578 | ) | (1,936 | ) | (5,980 | ) | (2,537 | ) | ||||||||
| 219,569 | 228,839 | 156,062 | 58,164 | |||||||||||||
|
|
C.
|
Selling expenses
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Salaries and related expenses
|
12,949 | 12,877 | 9,533 | 3,430 | ||||||||||||
|
Sales commissions
|
5,606 | 4,623 | - | 1,485 | ||||||||||||
|
Maintenance and rent
|
4,801 | 3,700 | 3,348 | 1,272 | ||||||||||||
|
Vehicles
|
4,544 | 5,144 | 3,711 | 1,204 | ||||||||||||
|
Advertising and promotion
|
3,920 | 2,195 | 1,793 | 1,038 | ||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,199 | 1,544 | 812 | 583 | ||||||||||||
|
Others
|
1,579 | 1,717 | 1,405 | 418 | ||||||||||||
| 35,598 | 31,800 | 20,602 | 9,430 | |||||||||||||
|
|
D.
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
Salaries and related expenses
|
12,583 | 8,305 | 6,045 | 3,333 | ||||||||||||
|
Office maintenance
|
1,351 | 1,279 | 1,181 | 358 | ||||||||||||
|
Professional fees
|
3,382 | 3,653 | 2,905 | 896 | ||||||||||||
|
Vehicles
|
790 | 509 | 72 | 209 | ||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
854 | 911 | 657 | 226 | ||||||||||||
|
Bad and doubtful debts
|
456 | 702 | 129 | 121 | ||||||||||||
|
Communication
|
214 | 308 | 296 | 57 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
821 | 1,196 | 995 | 217 | ||||||||||||
| 20,451 | 16,863 | 12,280 | 5,417 | |||||||||||||
|
|
E.
|
Employees benefit costs
|
|
Payroll
|
31,406 | 26,310 | 15,700 | 8,320 | ||||||||||||
|
Salary expenses relating Stock Incentive Plan
|
281 | - | - | 74 | ||||||||||||
|
Employee Benefit Plan expenses
|
50 | 545 | (122 | ) | 13 | |||||||||||
| 31,737 | 26,855 | 15,578 | 8,407 | |||||||||||||
|
|
F.
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
Depreciation of fixed assets
|
4,166 | 4,134 | 2,298 | 1,103 | ||||||||||||
|
Amortization of Intangible assets
|
421 | 278 | - | 112 | ||||||||||||
|
Amortization of prepaid rental expenses
|
1,190 | 610 | 134 | 315 | ||||||||||||
| 5,777 | 5,022 | 2,432 | 1,530 | |||||||||||||
|
|
A.
|
Other income
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Capital gain on fixed assets realization
|
85 | 85 | 16 | 22 | ||||||||||||
|
Capital Gain on purchase of additional shares in subsidiary
|
5,245 | - | - | 1,389 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
- | 50 | 438 | - | ||||||||||||
| 5,330 | 135 | 454 | 1,411 | |||||||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Other expenses
|
|
Loss from statutory suit
|
- | 1,981 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| - | 1,981 | - | - | |||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Interest income:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term bank deposits
|
597 | 1,474 | 2,251 | 158 | ||||||||||||
|
Changes in value of debentures held for trading
|
76 | 348 | 193 | 20 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
162 | 198 | 77 | 43 | ||||||||||||
|
Total interest income
|
835 | 2,020 | 2,521 | 221 | ||||||||||||
|
Other:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Changes in fair value of financial assets at fair values
|
2,652 | (4,836 | ) | (68 | ) | 703 | ||||||||||
|
Realized gain on derivatives
|
- | 243 | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency differences
|
(884 | ) | (1,602 | ) | (518 | ) | (234 | ) | ||||||||
|
Dividends
|
141 | 8 | 176 | 37 | ||||||||||||
|
Total financing income
|
2,744 | (4,167 | ) | 2,111 | 727 | |||||||||||
|
Interest expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Bank credit
|
240 | 343 | - | 64 | ||||||||||||
|
Short-term loans
|
238 | 226 | - | 63 | ||||||||||||
|
long-term loans
|
126 | 130 | - | 33 | ||||||||||||
|
Lease obligations
|
34 | 52 | - | 9 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
140 | 82 | 104 | 37 | ||||||||||||
|
Total interest expense
|
778 | 833 | 104 | 206 | ||||||||||||
|
Other:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Decrease in values of warrants to issue shares
|
(5 | ) | (1,035 | ) | (767 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
|
Realized loss on derivatives
|
77 | - | 102 | 20 | ||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency differences
|
(152 | ) | 286 | (38 | ) | (40 | ) | |||||||||
|
Bank fees
|
564 | 584 | 272 | 149 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
11 | 5 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
Total Other costs
|
495 | (160 | ) | (427 | ) | 131 | ||||||||||
|
Total financing costs
|
1,273 | 673 | (323 | ) | 337 |
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent
|
28,836 | 3,156 | 11,739 | 7,639 | ||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year from discontinued operations attributable to equity holders of the parent
|
1,600 | (3,942 | ) | (9,397 | ) | 424 | ||||||||||
|
Earnings used in the calculation of basic earnings per share from continuing operations
|
30,436 | (786 | ) | 2,342 | 8,063 | |||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Profit used to compute basic earning per share from continuing operations
|
28,836 | 3,156 | 11,739 | 7,639 | ||||||||||||
|
Profit used to compute diluted earning per share from continuing operations
|
28,836 | 3,156 | 11,739 | 7,639 | ||||||||||||
|
Profit used to compute basic earning per share from discontinued operations
|
1,600 | (3,942 | ) | (9,397 | ) | 424 | ||||||||||
|
Profit used to compute diluted earning per share from discontinued operations
|
1,600 | (3,942 | ) | (9,397 | ) | 424 | ||||||||||
|
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic earnings per share from continuing operations
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||
|
Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||
|
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||
|
Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | 10,267,893 | ||||||||||||
|
|
C.
|
As of December 31, 2009 there are no potential ordinary shares. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007 561,982 potential ordinary shares are not dilutive and are therefore excluded from the weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of diluted earnings per share.
|
|
Principal
activity
|
Date of
acquisition
|
Proportion of
shares acquired
|
Cost of
acquisition
|
||||||||
|
2008
|
|||||||||||
|
Shamir Salads
|
Producing and marketing salads
|
1/1/2008
|
51 | % | 5,000 | ||||||
|
The Distributor
|
Marketing food products
|
1/1/2008
|
51 | % | 1,454 | ||||||
|
2007
|
|||||||||||
|
Baron
|
Marketing food products
|
13/2/2007
|
50.1 | % | - | ||||||
|
WF
|
Marketing food products
|
19/1/2007
|
100 | % | 15,400 | ||||||
|
Shamir Salads
|
||||||||||||
|
Book value
|
Fair value on
adjustment
|
Fair value on
acquisition
|
||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash & cash equivalents
|
31 | - | 31 | |||||||||
|
Trade & other receivables
|
15,651 | - | 15,651 | |||||||||
|
Inventories
|
3,099 | - | 3,099 | |||||||||
|
Non-current assets:
|
||||||||||||
|
Property, Plant & equipment
|
7,331 | - | 7,331 | |||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
818 | - | 818 | |||||||||
|
Intangible assets
|
- | 3,373 | 3,373 | |||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Bank credit and short term loan
|
(10,225 | ) | - | (10,225 | ) | |||||||
|
Trade & other payables
|
(13,640 | ) | - | (13,640 | ) | |||||||
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
(74 | ) | - | (74 | ) | |||||||
|
Severance pay, net
|
(286 | ) | - | (286 | ) | |||||||
| 2,705 | 3,373 | 6,078 | ||||||||||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
(2,978 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Goodwill on acquisition
|
1,900 | |||||||||||
|
Total
|
5,000 | |||||||||||
|
The Distributor
|
||||
|
Book value
|
||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||
|
Cash & cash equivalents
|
759 | |||
|
Non-controlling interest
|
(372 | ) | ||
|
Goodwill on acquisition
|
1,067 | |||
|
Total
|
1,454 | |||
|
WF Kosher Food Distributors Ltd
|
||||||||||||
|
Book value
|
Fair value on adjustment
|
Fair value on acquisition
|
||||||||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||||||||||
|
Trade & other receivables
|
5,402 | - | 5,402 | |||||||||
|
Inventories
|
8,142 | - | 8,142 | |||||||||
|
Non-current assets:
|
||||||||||||
|
Property, Plant & equipment
|
208 | - | 208 | |||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
89 | - | 89 | |||||||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
|
Trade & other payables
|
(1,530 | ) | - | (1,530 | ) | |||||||
| 12,311 | - | 12,311 | ||||||||||
|
Goodwill on acquisition
|
3,089 | |||||||||||
|
Total
|
12,311 | - | 15,400 | |||||||||
|
|
A.
|
Fair values determined on a provisional basis
A valuation was performed for the purpose of allocating the acquisition cost of Shamir Salads and of the Danish company. The valuation determined, inter alia, that the entire excess cost in the acquisition of the Danish company should be allocated to goodwill (the goodwill was written off entirely in examination of its recoverability), while the acquisition cost of Shamir Salads was allocated as follows - the value of NIS 1,570 thousand was allocated to the brand name, the value of NIS 1,364 thousand was allocated to customer relations, and the value of NIS 439 thousand was allocated to technological know-how. The value of the goodwill was determined accordingly - NIS 1,900 thousand.
|
|
|
B.
|
Cost of acquisition
The cost of the joint establishment of the Danish distribution company was paid in cash. The acquisition cost of Shamir Salads was contingent upon the sum of the audited net profit, after neutralizing capital gains that Shamir Salads shall present in its audited financial statements for the year 2008, being multiplied by 2.55. As of December 31, 2008, and according to the total net profit that Shamir Salads presented for the year ended December 31, 2008, the sum of the compensation was calculated on the sum of the advance.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Total purchase consideration
|
- | 6,454 | 15,400 | |||||||||
|
Compensation paid in cash
|
- | 6,454 | 15,400 | |||||||||
|
Less: cash and cash equivalent balances acquired
|
- | (790 | ) | - | ||||||||
| - | 5,664 | 15,400 | ||||||||||
|
|
C.
|
Goodwill arising on acquisition
Goodwill was recognized during the acquisition of Shamir Salads, because the compensation that was paid within the scope of the business combination includes sums relating to the expected benefits from the synergy (cooperation), income growth, and future developments that are anticipated in the markets of both companies. These benefits are not recognized separately from the goodwill, since the future economic benefits deriving from them cannot be reliably measured. Furthermore, the compensation includes sums relating to benefits expected from Shamir Salad's experienced manpower; meaning, the costs that Shamir Salads saved (and that Willi-Food saved indirectly) due to the fact that Shamir Salads has existing manpower, which eliminated the need for a general recruitment of employees and job training (assembled workforce).
Goodwill was recognized during the acquisition of the Danish distribution company because the compensation that was paid within the scope of the business combination includes sums relating to the expected benefits from the synergy (cooperation), increased export income, and the receipt of licenses to export to the United States.
|
|
|
A.
|
Significant accounting policies
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognized, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in note 2 to the financial statements.
|
|
|
B.
|
Categories of financial instruments
|
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Financial assets
|
||||||||||||
|
Held for trading
|
11,356 | 9,444 | 3,008 | |||||||||
|
Trade and other receivables
(including cash and cash equivalents)
|
166,130 | 163,552 | 44,008 | |||||||||
|
Financial liabilities
|
||||||||||||
|
Held for trading
|
- | 5 | - | |||||||||
|
Amortized cost
|
74,299 | 85,804 | 19,682 | |||||||||
|
|
C.
|
Objectives of managing financial risks
The finance departments of the Group provide services to the business activity, enable access to local and international financial markets, supervise and manage the financial risks relating to the Group's activities using internal report that analyze the extent of the risk exposure according to degree and intensity. These risks include market risks (including currency risk, fair value risk in respect of the interest rates, price risk and cash flow risk in respect of the interest rates), credit risk and liquidity risk.
The Group reduces the impact of the aforesaid risks from time to time by using derivative financial instruments in order to hedge the risk exposures, such derivatives are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. Derivatives are used according to the Group's policy, which was approved by the boards of directors. The policy prescribes principles regarding: management of currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, the use of derivatives and of non-derivative financial instruments, and investment of liquidity surplus. The compliance with policy and the exposure levels are reviewed by the internal auditor on a continuing basis.
The financial management departments of the Group report to the investment committee of the Group and to the board of directors of the Company about the risks and about implementation of the assimilated policy in order to minimize the risk exposures.
|
|
|
D
.
|
Market risk
The Group's activity exposes it mainly to financial risks of fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currency and/or changes in the prices of the imported products and/or changes in the interest rates. The Group purchases forward foreign-currency swap contracts, as needed, opens documentary credit to suppliers, and carries out orders for imported goods.
During the report period, no change occurred in the exposure to market risks or in the way by which the Group manages or measures the risk
|
|
|
E
|
Other price risks
The Group's is exposed to price risks of - shares, certificate of participation in mutual fund and bonds, which are classified as financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss.
The carrying amount of the investments exposed to price risks of shares, certificate of participation in mutual fund and bonds is NIS 11,356 thousands (USD 3,008 thousands).
Sensitive analysis in respect to exposure relating to price risks of shares, certificate of participation in mutual fund and bonds:
The sensitivity analysis includes only shares, certificate of participation in mutual fund and bonds at the period end for a 10% change in its prices. A positive number below indicates an increase in profit and other equity where the prices strengthen 10% against the actual prices. For a 10% weakening of the prices against the actual prices, there would be an equal and opposite impact on the profit and other equity, and the balances below would be negative.
|
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
|||||||
|
Profit or loss
(1)
|
1,136 | 937 | ||||||
|
|
F.
|
Credit risk
|
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
||||||||||
|
0-120 days
|
- | 66 | - | |||||||||
|
120-150 days
|
- | 38 | - | |||||||||
|
150 days and above
|
1,277 | 1,054 | 338 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
1,277 | 1,158 | 338 | |||||||||
|
|
G.
|
Liquidity risk management
|
|
1 year
|
1-5 years
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest free
|
63,830 | - | 63,830 | |||||||||
|
Lease agreement liability
|
277 | - | 277 | |||||||||
|
Instruments bearing variable interest
|
10,105 | 97 | 10,202 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
74,212 | 97 | 74,309 | |||||||||
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
|
Interest free
|
65,813 | 2,166 | 67,979 | |||||||||
|
Lease agreement liability
|
333 | 271 | 604 | |||||||||
|
Instruments bearing variable interest
|
17,322 | - | 17,322 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
83,468 | 2,437 | 85,905 | |||||||||
|
|
G.
|
Liquidity risk management (Cont.)
|
|
|
2.
|
Non derivatives financial instruments
The following table presents the Group's maturity profile for its non-derivatives financial instruments based on their contractual maturity these financial instruments including interest relating to this assets, except for cases when the Group anticipates that the cash flow will occur on a different period.
|
|
1 month
|
1-3
Months
|
1-12
Months
|
1-5
Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial instruments which do not bear interest
|
114,083 | 51,835 | 7,922 | 3, 646 | 177,486 | |||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial instruments which do not bear interest
|
111,077 | 55,459 | 4,210 | 2,173 | 172,919 | |||||||||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
|||||||||||||
|
USD
|
20,257 | 30,464 | 5,811 | 17,465 | ||||||||||||
|
EUR
|
5,676 | 2,347 | 73 | 870 | ||||||||||||
|
DKK
|
- | 3,841 | - | 4,004 | ||||||||||||
|
Other
|
58 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
USD Impact
|
EUR Impact
|
|||||||
|
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
|||||||
|
Profit or loss
(1)
|
1,445 | 560 | ||||||
|
USD Impact
|
EUR Impact
|
|||||||
|
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
|||||||
|
Profit or loss
(1)
|
1,300 | 148 | ||||||
|
|
(1)
|
The increase in the Group's sensitivity to a 10% increase and decrease in the NIS against the relevant foreign currencies is mainly attributable to the decrease in balances with foreign customers relating to the disposal of the export operation, and to decrease in forward foreign exchange contracts.
|
|
Average
exchange rate
|
Foreign Currency
|
Contract value
|
Fair value
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
Currency thousands
|
NIS thousands
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash Flows hedges
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of USD sell NIS
|
- | 3.5878 | - | 900 | - | 3,349 | - | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
I.
|
Fair value of financial instruments
|
|
|
·
|
Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
·
|
Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
|
|
|
·
|
Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
NIS
|
|||||||||||||
|
financial assets ‘at fair value through profit or loss’ (FVTPL)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Marketable securities
|
11,356 | - | - | 11,356 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
11,356 | - | - | 11,356 | ||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Profit for the year from discontinued operations
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
30,533 | 63,442 | 50,316 | 8,088 | ||||||||||||
|
Expenses
|
28,197 | 66,601 | 58,587 | 7,469 | ||||||||||||
|
Loss before tax
|
2,336 | (3,159 | ) | (8,271 | ) | 619 | ||||||||||
|
Attributable income tax expense
|
114 | 337 | 477 | 30 | ||||||||||||
| 2,222 | (3,496 | ) | (8,748 | ) | 589 | |||||||||||
|
Loss related to discontinued operations (including disposal of foreign currency translation reserve in the amount of NIS 231 thousand)
|
(294 | ) | - | - | (78 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Loss for the year from discontinued operations
|
1,928 | (3,496 | ) | (8,748 | ) | 511 | ||||||||||
|
Loss for the year from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the Company
|
1,600 | (3,942 | ) | (9,397 | ) | 424 | ||||||||||
|
Import
|
Manufacturing
|
Adjustments
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues from external customers
|
229,848 | 73,612 | - | 303,460 | ||||||||||||
|
Revenues from subsidiaries
|
104 | - | (104 | ) | - | |||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
229,952 | 73,612 | (104 | ) | 303,460 | |||||||||||
|
Profit before income taxes
|
34,185 | 458 | - | 34,643 | ||||||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
4,869 | 174 | - | 5,043 | ||||||||||||
|
Profit from continuing operations
|
29,316 | 284 | - | 29,600 | ||||||||||||
|
Import
|
Manufacturing
|
Discontinued Export Operations
|
Adjustments
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total segment assets
|
243,974 | 38,769 | 45 | (69 | ) | 282,719 | ||||||||||||||
|
Segment liabilities
|
(43,635 | ) | (29,639 | ) | (3,034 | ) | 69 | (76,239 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Import
|
Manufacturing
|
Adjustments
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues from external customers
|
218,820 | 70,248 | - | 289,068 | ||||||||||||
|
Revenues from subsidiaries
|
379 | 143 | (522 | ) | - | |||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
219,199 | 70,391 | (522 | ) | 289,068 | |||||||||||
|
Profit before income taxes
|
3,645 | 1,235 | - | 4,880 | ||||||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
750 | 367 | - | 1,117 | ||||||||||||
|
Profit from continuing operations
|
2,895 | 868 | - | 3,763 | ||||||||||||
|
Import
|
Manufacturing
|
Discontinued Export Operations
|
Adjustments
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total segment assets
|
216,205 | 39,948 | 18,237 | (1,048 | ) | 273,342 | ||||||||||||||
|
Segment liabilities
|
(42,914 | ) | (31,102 | ) | (14,792 | ) | 1,048 | (87,760 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Import
|
Adjustments
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues from external customers
|
201,617 | - | 201,617 | |||||||||
|
Revenues from subsidiaries
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
201,617 | - | 201,617 | |||||||||
|
Profit before income taxes
|
15,561 | - | 15,561 | |||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
2,174 | - | 2,174 | |||||||||
|
Profit from continuing operations
|
13,387 | - | 13,387 | |||||||||
|
|
(*)
|
The manufacturing operation was acquired in 2008 through the acquisition of Shamir Salads. See note 24.
|
|
Import
|
Discontinued Export Operations
|
Adjustments
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
December 31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total segment assets
|
229,497 | 22,168 | (12,213 | ) | 239,452 | |||||||||||
|
Segment liabilities
|
(33,172 | ) | (27,886 | ) | 12,213 | (48,845 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
A.
|
Transactions with Related Parties
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 7
|
2 0 0 9
|
|||||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Purchases of goods
|
1,174 | 586 | 1,568 | 311 | ||||||||||||
|
Participation in expenses
|
76 | 70 | 67 | 20 | ||||||||||||
|
Management fees
|
2,813 | 2,650 | 2,404 | 745 | ||||||||||||
|
Bonus
|
4,078 | 75 | 762 | 1,080 | ||||||||||||
|
|
B.
|
Balances with Related Parties
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Due to officers
|
4,179 | 223 | 1,107 | |||||||||
|
Parent company
|
1,595 | 1,467 | 423 | |||||||||
|
|
Secured liabilities of the Group
|
|
As of December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2 0 0 9
|
2 0 0 8
|
2 0 0 9
|
||||||||||
|
NIS
|
US Dollars
|
|||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Bank credit
|
1,152 | 4,514 | 305 | |||||||||
|
Bank loans
|
8,096 | 8,871 | 2,145 | |||||||||
|
Liability relating to Lease agreement
|
277 | 584 | 73 | |||||||||
| 9,525 | 13,969 | 2,523 | ||||||||||
|
|
Shamir Salads pledged assets:
|
|
Secured asset
|
The book value of the secured asset
|
Lien's category
|
The amount of the lien
|
|||
|
Vehicle
|
NIS 490,993 (USD 130,064)
|
Pledge
|
NIS 277 thousands (USD 73 thousands)
|
| G. WILLI-FOOD INTERNATIONAL LTD. | |||
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph Willige | |
|
Joseph Williger
|
|||
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
†1.1
|
Memorandum of Association of the Company, as amended (1)
|
|
1.2
|
Articles of Association of the Company, as amended (4)
|
|
2.1
|
Specimen of Certificate for ordinary shares (2)
|
|
4.1
|
Share Option Plan (2)
|
|
†4.2
|
Management Agreement between the Company and Yossi Willi Management Investments Ltd.,
dated June 1, 1998 (3)
|
|
†4.3
|
Amendment to the Management Agreement between the Company and Yossi Willi Management Investments Ltd., dated August 1, 2005 (4)
|
|
†4.4
|
Management Agreement between the Company and Zwi W. & Co. Ltd., dated June 1, 1998 (3)
|
|
†4.5
|
Amendment to the Management Agreement between the Company and Zwi W. & Co., Ltd., dated
August 1, 2005 (4)
|
|
†4.6
|
Lease of Company’s premises with Titanic Food Ltd., dated November 23, 1998 (3)
|
|
†4.7
|
Services Agreement between the Company and Willi Food, dated April 1, 1997 (3)
|
|
†4.8
|
Transfer Agreement between the Company and Gold Frost dated February 16, 2006 (4)
|
|
†4.9
|
Lease agreement for Logistics Center between the Company and Gold Frost dated February 16, 2006 (4)
|
|
4.10
|
Relationship Agreement between the Company, Gold Frost, Willi Food, Zwi Williger and Joseph Williger
dated February 28, 2006 (4)
|
|
4.11
|
Placing Agreement between the Company, Gold Frost, certain officers of Gold Frost and Corporate Synergy dated March 2, 2006 (4)
|
|
4.12
|
Lock In Agreement, between the Company, Gold Frost, Corporate Synergy and certain officers of Gold Frost, dated March 2, 2006 (4)
|
|
4.13
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2006, among the Company and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto. (5)
|
|
4.14
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2006, among the Company and the investors signatory thereto. (5)
|
|
4.15
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2007, by and among the Company, WF Kosher Food
Distributors, Ltd., Laish Israeli Food Products Ltd. and Arie Steiner.(6)
|
|
†4.16
|
Agreement, dated February 11, 2007, between the Company and Mr. Ya'acov Baron, Ms. Hedva Baron, Mr. Li'or Baron, Ms. Gozlan Or'na and Ms. Michal Baron Sha'hak
.
(6)
|
|
†4.17
|
Agreement, dated January 2, 2008, between the Company and Mr. Jacob Ginsberg, Mr. Amiram Guy and Shamir Salads 2006 Ltd
.
(7)
|
|
4.18
|
Share Purchase Agreement, dated February 13, 2008, between Gold Frost and Kirkeby Cheese
Export
A/S. (7)
|
|
4.19
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated February 13, 2008, between Gold Frost and Kirkeby Cheese
Export
A/S. (7)
|
|
4.20
|
Co-operation Agreement, dated January 1, 2008, between Kirkeby Cheese Export
A/S,
Haarby Mejeri/Kirkeby Dairy ApS and
Kirkeby International Foods A/S.
(7)
|
|
8
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (4)
|
|
8.1
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (7)
|
|
8.2
|
Subsidiaries of the Company* |
|
12.1
|
Certification of CEO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
12.2
|
Certification of CFO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
13.1
|
Certification of CEO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
13.2
|
Certification of CFO of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
15.(a).1
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*
|
|
|
†
|
English translations from Hebrew original.
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by Reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1, File No. 333-6314.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001.
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005.
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-3, File No. 333-138200.
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
(7)
|
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
*
|
Filed Herewith
|
No information found
* THE VALUE IS THE MARKET VALUE AS OF THE LAST DAY OF THE QUARTER FOR WHICH THE 13F WAS FILED.
| FUND | NUMBER OF SHARES | VALUE ($) | PUT OR CALL |
|---|
| DIRECTORS | AGE | BIO | OTHER DIRECTOR MEMBERSHIPS |
|---|
No information found
No Customers Found
No Suppliers Found
Price
Yield
| Owner | Position | Direct Shares | Indirect Shares |
|---|