XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
10-Ks and 10-Qs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________
FORM 10-K
____________________________
(Mark One)
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period ended ______ to ______
Commission file number 001-36594
___________________________
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
_______________________
|
Maryland
|
|
20-0141677
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 S. Orange Avenue
Suite 1200, Orlando, Florida
|
|
32801
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code): (407) 317-6950
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of Each Class:
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered:
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
o
Yes
þ
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. (See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
Large accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated filer
|
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
þ
|
Smaller reporting company
|
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o
Yes
þ
No
The aggregate market value of the 111,645,384 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $2.43 billion based on the closing price of the New York Stock Exchange for such common stock as of June 30,
2015
.
As of
March 1, 2016
, there were
108,913,184
shares of the registrant's common stock, $0.01 per value per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant incorporates by reference portions of its Definitive Proxy Statement for the
2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be held on May 24, 2016, into Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent stated herein.
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
2015 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
|
Item No.
|
Part I
|
Page
|
|
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
|
||
|
Market and Industry Data
|
||
|
Trademarks, Service Marks, and Tradenames
|
||
|
Disclaimer
|
||
|
Certain Defined Terms
|
||
|
Item 1.
|
Business
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Properties
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
|
|
Part II
|
||
|
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
|
|
Part III
|
||
|
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
|
|
Part IV
|
||
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules
|
|
|
Signatures
|
||
- i -
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"), other than purely historical information, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("the Exchange Act"). These statements include statements about Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s ("Xenia") plans, objectives, strategies, financial performance and outlook, trends, the amount and timing of future cash distributions, prospects or future events and involve known and unknown risks that are difficult to predict. As a result, our actual financial results, performance, achievements or prospects may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as "may," "could," "expect," "intend," "plan," "seek," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "guidance," "predict," "potential," "continue," "likely," "will," "would," "illustrative" and variations of these terms and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Xenia and its management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, are inherently uncertain. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and stockholders should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. There are a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors, include, among others, the risks, uncertainties and factors set forth under "Part I-Item IA. Risk Factors" and "Part II-Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and the risks and uncertainties related to the following:
|
•
|
business, financial and operating risks inherent to real estate investments and the lodging industry;
|
|
•
|
seasonal and cyclical volatility in the lodging industry;
|
|
•
|
adverse changes in the energy industry that result in a downturn of related businesses and corporate spending that may negatively impact our revenues and results of operations;
|
|
•
|
macroeconomic and other factors beyond our control that can adversely affect and reduce demand for hotel rooms;
|
|
•
|
contraction in the U.S. or global economy or low levels of economic growth;
|
|
•
|
levels of spending in business and leisure segments as well as consumer confidence;
|
|
•
|
declines in occupancy ("OCC") and average daily rate ("ADR");
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the supply and demand for hotel rooms;
|
|
•
|
changes in the competitive environment in lodging industry, including due to consolidation of management companies and/or franchisors, and the markets where we own hotels;
|
|
•
|
events beyond our control, such as war, terrorist attacks, travel-related health concerns and natural disasters;
|
|
•
|
our reliance on third-party hotel management companies to operate and manage our hotels;
|
|
•
|
our ability to maintain good relationships with our third-party hotel management companies and franchisors;
|
|
•
|
our failure to maintain brand operating standards;
|
|
•
|
our ability to maintain our brand licenses at our hotels;
|
|
•
|
relationships with labor unions and changes in labor laws;
|
|
•
|
loss of our senior management team or key personnel;
|
|
•
|
our ability to identify and consummate acquisitions and dispositions of additional hotels;
|
|
•
|
our ability to integrate and successfully operate any hotel properties acquired in the future and the risks associated with these hotel properties;
|
|
•
|
the impact of hotel renovations, repositionings, redevelopments and re-branding activities;
|
|
•
|
our ability to access capital for renovations and acquisitions on terms and at times that are acceptable to us;
|
- ii -
|
•
|
the fixed cost nature of hotel ownership;
|
|
•
|
our ability to service, restructure or refinance our debt;
|
|
•
|
changes in interest rates and operating costs;
|
|
•
|
compliance with regulatory regimes and local laws;
|
|
•
|
uninsured or underinsured losses, including those relating to natural disasters or terrorism;
|
|
•
|
changes in distribution channels, such as through internet travel intermediaries or websites that facilitate the short-term rental of homes and apartments from owners;
|
|
•
|
our status as an emerging growth company;
|
|
•
|
the amount of debt that we currently have or may incur in the future;
|
|
•
|
provisions in our debt agreements that may restrict the operation of our business;
|
|
•
|
our separation from InvenTrust Properties Corp. ("InvenTrust"), our former parent;
|
|
•
|
our organizational and governance structure; our status as a real estate investment trust (a "REIT");
|
|
•
|
our taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS") lessee structure;
|
|
•
|
the cost of compliance with and liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws;
|
|
•
|
adverse litigation judgments or settlements;
|
|
•
|
changes in real estate and zoning laws and increase in real property tax rates;
|
|
•
|
changes in federal, state or local tax law, including legislative, administrative, regulatory or other actions affecting REITs;
|
|
•
|
changes in governmental regulations or interpretations thereof; and
|
|
•
|
estimates relating to our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in the future.
|
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause our actual financial results, performance, achievements or prospects to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our results. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth above. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake or assume any obligation to update publicly any of these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, new information or future events, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking statements, except to the extent required by applicable laws. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.
The "Company", "Xenia", "we", "our" or "us" means Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and one or more of its subsidiaries (including XHR LP (the "Operating Partnership") and XHR Holding Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, "XHR Holding")), or, as the context may require, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. only, the Operating Partnership only or XHR Holding only.
- iii -
MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA
The market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this Annual Report are based on independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources. These sources generally state that the information they provide has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of the information are not guaranteed. The forecasts and projections are based on industry surveys and the preparers’ experience in the industry, and there is no assurance that any of the projected amounts will be achieved. We believe that the surveys and market research others have performed are reliable, but we have not independently verified this information. STR. Inc. ("STR") and CBRE Hotels ("CBRE") are the primary sources for third-party market data and industry statistics and forecasts. STR does not guarantee the performance of any company about which it collects and provides data. The reproduction of STR’s data without their written permission is strictly prohibited. Nothing in the STR or CBRE data should be construed as advice. Some data is also based on our good faith estimates.
TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS AND TRADENAMES
Xenia Hotels & Resorts® and related trademarks, trade names and service marks of Xenia appearing in this Annual Report are the property of Xenia. Unless otherwise noted, all other trademarks, trade names or service marks appearing in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners, including Marriott International, Inc., Hilton Worldwide Inc., Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc., The Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group Inc., Aston Hotels & Resorts LLC, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts and Loews Hotels, or their respective parents, subsidiaries or affiliates ("Brand Companies"). In the event that any of our management agreements or franchise agreements with the Brand Companies are terminated for any reason, the use of all applicable trademarks and service marks owned by the Brand Companies will cease at the hotel where the management agreement or franchise agreement was terminated; all signs and materials bearing the marks and other indicia connecting the hotel to the Brand Companies will be removed (at the hotel’s or our expense).
DISCLAIMER
None of the Brand Companies or their respective directors, officers, agents or employees are issuers of the shares described herein or had responsibility for the creation or contents of this Annual Report. None of the Brand Companies or their respective directors, officers, agents or employees make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of the following information, including any financial information and any projections of future performance. The Brand Companies do not have an exclusive relationship with us and will continue to be engaged in other business ventures, including the acquisition, development, construction, ownership or operation of lodging, residential and vacation ownership properties, which are or may become competitive with the properties held by us.
CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS
Except where the context suggests otherwise, we define certain terms in this Annual Report as follows:
|
•
|
"ADR" or "average daily rate" means hotel room revenue divided by total number of rooms sold in a given period; and
|
|
•
|
"occupancy" means the total number of rooms sold in a given period divided by the total number of rooms available at a hotel or group of hotels;
|
|
•
|
"RevPAR" or "revenue per available room" means hotel room revenue divided by room nights available to guests for a given period, and does not include non-room revenues such as food and beverage revenue or other operating revenues;
|
|
•
|
"Top 25 Markets" refers to the top 25 U.S. lodging markets as defined by STR;
|
|
•
|
an "upper midscale" hotel refers to an upper midscale hotel as defined by STR;
|
|
•
|
an "upscale" hotel refers to an upscale hotel as defined by STR;
|
|
•
|
an "urban upscale" hotel refers to a hotel located in an urban or similar high-density commercial area, such as a central business district, and defined as "upscale" or "upper midscale" by STR;
|
|
•
|
an "upper upscale" hotel refers to an upper upscale hotel as defined by STR;
|
|
•
|
a "luxury" hotel refers to a luxury hotel as defined by STR;
|
- iv -
|
•
|
a "lifestyle" hotel refers to an innovative hotel with a focus on providing a unique and individualized guest experience in a smaller footprint by combining traditional hotel services with modern technologies and placing an emphasis on local influence;
|
|
•
|
a "premium full service hotel" refers to a hotel defined as "upper upscale" or "luxury" by STR, but excluding hotels referred to as "lifestyle" hotels, as defined above;
|
|
•
|
"Aston," "Fairmont," "Hilton," "Hyatt," "Kimpton," "Loews," "Marriott," and "Starwood" mean Aston Hotels & Resorts LLC, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts, Hilton Worldwide Inc., Hyatt Hotels Corporation, The Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group Inc., Loews Hotels, Marriott International, Inc., and Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc., respectively, as well as their respective parents, subsidiaries or affiliates.
|
- v -
General
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the "Company" or "Xenia") is a Maryland corporation that invests primarily in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels. Prior to February 3, 2015, Xenia was a wholly owned subsidiary of InvenTrust Properties Corp. (formerly known as Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. or "InvenTrust"), its former parent.
On February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust through a taxable pro rata distribution by InvenTrust of
95%
of the outstanding common stock,
$0.01
par value per share (the "Common Stock"), of Xenia to holders of record of InvenTrust's common stock as of the close of business on January 20, 2015 (the "Record Date"). Each holder of record of InvenTrust's common stock received one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust’s common stock held at the close of business on the Record Date (the "Distribution"). In lieu of fractional shares, stockholders of InvenTrust received cash. On February 4, 2015, Xenia’s Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the ticker symbol "XHR." As a result of the Distribution, the Company became a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. Xenia intends to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See additional detail below in "Part I-Item 1. Our Structure and Reorganization Transactions."
Substantially all of the Company's assets are held by, and all the operations are conducted through XHR LP. XHR GP, Inc. is the sole general partner of XHR LP. XHR GP, Inc. is wholly owned by the Company. On
December 31, 2015
, the Company owned
99.5%
of the common limited partnership units issued by the Operating Partnership ("operating partnership units"). The remaining
0.5%
of the common units are owned by the other limited partners comprised of certain of our executive officers and members of our board of directors and includes unvested long term incentive plan ("LTIP") partnership units, which may or may not vest based on the passage of time and meeting certain market-based performance objectives. To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Therefore, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease the hotel properties to XHR Holding, the Company's taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"), which engages third-party eligible independent operators to manage the hotels. The
third-party non-affiliated hotel operators manage each hotel pursuant to a hotel management agreement, the terms of which are discussed in more detail under "Part I-Item 2. Our Principal Agreements".
The Company's combined consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, XHR Holding, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated joint venture investments. The Company's subsidiaries and joint ventures generally consist of limited liability companies ("LLCs"), limited partnerships ("LPs") and the TRS. The effects of all significant inter-company transactions are eliminated.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the Company owned
50
lodging properties,
48
of which were wholly owned, with a total of
12,548
rooms, including a
75%
ownership interest in two hotels owned through two consolidated joint ventures.
The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 200 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 1200, Orlando, Florida, 32801, and our telephone number is (407) 317-6950. The Company’s website is www.xeniareit.com. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website neither constitutes part of this information statement nor is incorporated by reference herein.
Our Structure and Reorganization Transactions
Our History
We were formed as a Delaware corporation in 2007 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of InvenTrust. Subsequently, we changed our name from Inland American Lodging Group, Inc. to IA Lodging Group, Inc. and converted to a Maryland corporation in 2014. On August 5, 2014, we changed our name to Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Our Operating Partnership was formed as a North Carolina limited partnership in 1994. On September 17, 2014, our Operating Partnership was converted to a Delaware limited partnership and changed its name to XHR LP. Our wholly-owned subsidiary is the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, and we conduct substantially all of our business through our Operating Partnership. As of
December 31, 2015
, we own
99.5%
of the operating partnership units in our Operating Partnership, with the remaining
0.5%
being owned by certain of our executive officers and members of the board of directors.
1
Our Corporate Reorganization
Prior to our separation from InvenTrust, we effectuated certain reorganization transactions (collectively, the "Reorganization Transactions") which were designed to: consolidate the ownership of our hotels into our Operating Partnership; consolidate our TRS lessees into our TRS; facilitate our separation from InvenTrust and the Distribution; and enable us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with our short taxable year that commenced on January 5, 2015 and ended on February 3, 2015.
The significant elements of our Reorganization Transactions included:
|
•
|
The Company was renamed and converted to a Maryland corporation;
|
|
•
|
Our Operating Partnership was renamed and converted to a Delaware limited partnership;
|
|
•
|
Certain of our TRS lessees were transferred from a subsidiary of InvenTrust into our TRS;
|
|
•
|
Certain subsidiaries owning our hotels were transferred to our Operating Partnership from other subsidiaries of ours, which subsidiaries were transferred to subsidiaries of InvenTrust other than us;
|
|
•
|
We classified and designated 125 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and issued 125 shares to 125 individual investors;
|
|
•
|
We issued 113,396,997 shares of our common stock to InvenTrust pursuant to a stock dividend effectuated prior to the Distribution; and
|
|
•
|
Certain subsidiaries that previously owned or leased the Suburban Select Service Portfolio (as defined below) or other hotels previously owned by us were transferred out of our Operating Partnership and our TRS and into subsidiaries of InvenTrust.
|
Prior to the Reorganization Transactions, we owned all of our hotels and certain of our TRS lessees, and our remaining TRS lessees were owned by subsidiaries of InvenTrust other than us. In addition, prior to the sale of 52 suburban select service hotels (the "Suburban Select Service Portfolio"), we also owned all of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio and subsidiaries leasing certain hotels in the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, and the remaining subsidiaries leasing the Suburban Select Service Portfolio were owned by subsidiaries of InvenTrust other than us.
The Suburban Select Service Portfolio was sold on November 17, 2014 to unaffiliated third party purchasers for approximately $1.1 billion, resulting in net proceeds to InvenTrust of approximately $480 million after prepayment of certain indebtedness and related costs. None of the proceeds from the sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio were retained by Xenia.
Pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement we entered into with InvenTrust in connection with the Distribution (the "Separation and Distribution Agreement"), we agreed to assume the first $8 million of liabilities (including any related fees and expenses) incurred following the Distribution relating to, arising out of or resulting from the ownership, operation or sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio and that relate to, arise out of or result from a claim or demand that is made against Xenia or InvenTrust by any person who is not a party or an affiliate of a party to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, other than liabilities arising from the breach or alleged breach by InvenTrust of certain fundamental representations made by InvenTrust to the third party purchasers of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We have also agreed to assume and indemnify InvenTrust for certain tax liabilities attributable to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. As part of our working capital at the time of the Distribution, InvenTrust left us with cash estimated to be sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations. The hotels included in the Suburban Select Service Portfolio were not retained by Xenia because such hotels did not generally fit within our investment criteria of investing in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels, with a focus on the Top 25 Markets as well as key leisure destinations in the United States. In selecting the hotels to retain in our portfolio, we also took into consideration factors such as supply growth dynamics in various markets, RevPAR and risk-adjusted return potential. In addition to the sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, we also sold one hotel on May 30, 2014, one hotel on August 28, 2014 and one hotel on December 31, 2014.
2
The following chart shows our structure as of December 31, 2015:
|
(1)
|
Ownership includes unvested LTIP partnership units, which may or may not vest based on the passage of time and meeting certain market-based performance objectives.
|
Business Objectives and Growth Strategies
Our objective is to invest primarily in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels at valuations where we believe we can generate attractive returns on investment and long-term value appreciation and improve the value of our portfolio through aggressive asset management. We pursue this objective through the following investment and growth strategies:
|
•
|
Pursue Differentiated Investment Strategy Across Targeted Markets.
We use our management team’s network of relationships in the lodging industry and our relationships with the 13 hotel management companies as of
December 31, 2015
that currently manage assets in our portfolio, among others, to continue to source acquisition opportunities. When evaluating opportunities, we consider the following characteristics:
|
|
•
|
Market Characteristics.
We seek opportunities across a range of urban and dense suburban areas, primarily in the Top 25 Markets as well as key leisure destinations, in the United States. We believe that this strategy provides us with a broader range of opportunities and allows us to target markets and sub-markets with particular positive characteristics, such as multiple demand generators, favorable supply and demand dynamics and attractive projected RevPAR growth. We believe assets in the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations present attractive investment opportunities considering the favorable supply and demand dynamics, RevPAR growth trends and attractive valuations.
|
|
•
|
Asset Characteristics.
We generally pursue hotels in the upscale, upper upscale and luxury segments that are affiliated with leading premium brands, as we believe these segments yield attractive risk-adjusted returns. Within these segments, we seek hotels that will provide guests with a distinctive lodging experience, tailored to reflect local market environments rather than invest in properties that are heavily dependent on conventions and group business. We seek properties with desirable locations within their markets, exceptional facilities, and other competitive advantages that are hard to replicate. We also favor properties that can be purchased well below estimated replacement cost. We believe that our focus on premium full service, lifestyle, and urban upscale assets allows us to seek appropriate investments that are well suited for specific markets.
|
|
•
|
Operational and Structural Characteristics.
We pursue both newly constructed assets that require limited capital investment as well as more mature and complex properties with opportunities for our dedicated asset and project management teams to create value through more active operational oversight and targeted capital expenditures. Additionally, we generally seek properties that are unencumbered by debt and that will not require joint venture ownership, allowing us maximum operational flexibility.
|
3
We believe that our multi-pronged approach to investing provides us the flexibility to pursue attractive opportunities whenever
and wherever they are presented.
|
•
|
Drive Growth through Proactive, Value-Added Asset Management, Project Management and Capital Allocation.
We believe that investing in our properties and employing a proactive asset management approach designed to identify investment strategies will optimize internal growth opportunities. Our management team’s extensive industry experience across multiple brands and management companies and our integrated asset management and project management teams, enable us to identify and implement value-added strategies, prudently invest capital in our assets to optimize operating results and leverage best practices across our portfolio.
|
|
•
|
Aggressive Asset Management Strategy Drives Performance.
Our experienced asset management team focuses on driving property performance through revenue enhancement and cost containment efforts. Our ability to work with a wide variety of management and franchise companies provides us with the opportunity to benchmark performance across our portfolio in order to share best practices. While we do not operate our hotel properties directly, and under the terms of our hotel management agreements our ability to participate in operating decisions regarding our hotels is limited, we conduct regular revenue, sales, and financial performance reviews and also perform in-depth on-site reviews focused on ongoing operating margin improvement initiatives. We interact frequently with our management companies and on-site management personnel, including conducting regular meetings with key executives of our management companies and brands. We work to maximize the value of our assets through all aspects of the hotel operation and ancillary real estate opportunities.
|
|
•
|
In-House Project Management Provides Better and Faster Capital Plan Execution.
By maintaining a dedicated in-house capital planning and project management team, we believe we are able to develop our capital plans and execute our renovation projects at a lower cost and in a more timely manner than if we outsourced these services. In addition, our project management team has extensive experience in the ground-up development of hotel properties, providing both in-depth knowledge of building construction as well as the opportunity for us to evaluate potential development opportunities. We view this as a significant competitive strength relative to many of our peers.
|
|
•
|
Rigorous Capital Allocation Strategies Enhance Portfolio Performance.
As part of our ongoing asset management activities, we regularly review opportunities to reinvest in our hotels to maintain quality, increase long-term value and generate attractive returns on invested capital. We also may opportunistically dispose of hotels to take advantage of market conditions or in situations where the hotels no longer fit within our strategic objectives. We believe our breadth of experience and integrated in-house asset management and project management teams are instrumental in our ability to acquire and operate assets and to capitalize on redevelopment opportunities.
|
|
•
|
Leverage Existing Infrastructure for Growth.
Prior to the sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, our asset management and project management employees were responsible for asset management oversight of a portfolio consisting of substantially more hotels. We have since retained the asset management and project management professionals that oversee our portfolio. We believe this level of staffing provides us with the capacity to accommodate additional growth in our portfolio without a significant increase in employees focusing on asset management and project management. Our core acquisition, asset management and project management teams have been working together for a number of years and have well-established systems and procedures.
|
Our Financing Strategy
Over time, we intend to finance our long-term growth with issuances of common and preferred equity securities and debt financings having staggered maturities. Our debt includes a senior unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, mortgage debt secured by our hotel properties or leasehold interests under the ground leases on our hotel properties, and may include other debt in the future.
We anticipate using our senior unsecured revolving credit facility, unsecured term loans, common and preferred equity issuances, and mortgage or other debt financings to fund future acquisitions as well as for property redevelopments, return on investment initiatives, working capital requirements, and share repurchase programs. Subject to market conditions, we intend to repay amounts outstanding under the senior unsecured revolving credit facility from time to time with proceeds from periodic common and preferred equity issuances, long-term debt financings, sale of assets, and cash flows from operations.
4
Competition
The U.S. lodging industry is highly competitive. Our hotels compete with other hotels and alternative accommodation options for guests in each of their markets on the basis of several factors, including, among others, room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels and amenities, location, brand affiliation, reputation and reservation systems. Competition is often specific to the individual markets in which our hotels are located and includes competition from existing and new hotels and alternative accommodation options. We believe that hotels, such as our portfolio of hotels that are affiliated with leading national brands, will enjoy the competitive advantages associated with operating under such brands. Increased competition could harm our occupancy and revenues and may require us to provide additional amenities or make capital improvements that we otherwise would not have to make, which may materially and adversely affect our operating results and liquidity.
We face competition for the acquisition of hotels from other REITs, private equity firms, institutional investors, hedge funds, specialty finance companies, insurance companies, governmental bodies and other entities. Some of these competitors have substantially greater financial and operational resources and access to capital than we have and may have greater knowledge of the markets in which we seek to invest. This competition may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us and decrease the attractiveness of the terms on which we may acquire our targeted hotel investments, including the cost thereof. In addition, these competitors seek financing through the same channels that we do. Therefore, we compete for funding in a market where funds for real estate investment may decrease, or grow less than the underlying demand.
Seasonality
The lodging industry is seasonal in nature which can be expected to cause fluctuations in our hotel room revenues, occupancy levels, room rates, operating expenses and cash flows. The periods during which our hotels experience higher or lower levels of demand vary from property to property and depend upon location, type of property, and competitive mix within the specific location. Generally our revenues and operating income have been the lowest during the first quarter of each year, which we expect to be consistent from year to year for our current portfolio.
Cyclicality
The hospitality industry is cyclical and generally follows the overall economy. There is a history of increases and decreases in demand for hotel rooms, in occupancy levels and in rates realized by owners of hotels through economic cycles. Variability of results through some of the cycles in the past has been more severe due to changes in the supply of hotel rooms in given markets or in given segments of hotels. The combination of changes in economic conditions and in the supply of hotel rooms can result in significant volatility in results for owners of hotel properties. The costs of running a hotel tend to be more fixed than variable. Because of this, in an environment of declining revenues the rate of decline in earnings will be higher than the rate of decline in revenues. Conversely, in an environment of increasing demand and room rates, the rate of increase in earnings is typically higher than the rate of increase in revenues.
Regulations
General
Our hotels are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to common areas and fire and safety requirements. We believe that each of our hotels has the necessary permits and approvals to operate its business.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Our hotels must comply with applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA"), to the extent that such hotels are "public accommodations" as defined by the ADA. The ADA may require removal of structural barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our hotels where such removal is readily achievable. We believe that our hotels are in substantial compliance with the ADA and that we will not be required to make substantial capital expenditures to address the requirements of the ADA. However, non-compliance with the ADA could result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess our hotels and to make alterations as appropriate in this respect.
5
Environmental Matters
Under various laws relating to the protection of the environment, a current or previous owner or operator (including tenants) of real estate may be liable for contamination resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances at that property and may be required to investigate and clean up such contamination at that property or emanating from that property. These costs could be substantial and liability
under these laws may attach without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the contaminants, and the liability may be joint and several. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our hotels may expose us to third-party liability or materially and adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop the real estate or to incur debt using the real estate as collateral.
Our hotels are subject to various federal, state, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that address a wide variety of issues, including, but not limited to, storage tanks, air emissions from emergency generators, storm water and wastewater discharges, lead-based paint, mold and mildew and waste management. Our hotels incur costs to comply with these laws and regulations and could be subject to fines and penalties for noncompliance.
Some of our hotels contain asbestos-containing building materials. We believe that the asbestos is appropriately contained, in accordance with current environmental regulations and that we have no need for any immediate remediation or current plans to remove the asbestos. Environmental laws require that owners or operators of buildings with asbestos-containing building materials properly manage and maintain these materials, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators for failure to comply with these requirements. In addition, third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos-containing building materials.
Some of our hotels may contain or develop harmful mold or suffer from other adverse conditions, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediation. The presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our hotels could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants from the affected hotel or increase indoor ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability from guests or employees at our hotels and others if property damage or health concerns arise.
JOBS Act
As a company with less than $1.0 billion in revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the "JOBS Act"). Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. However, we are choosing to "opt out" of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.
An emerging growth company may also take advantage of reduced reporting requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies. These provisions include, but are not limited to:
|
•
|
not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act");
|
|
•
|
reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; and
|
|
•
|
exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
|
We may take advantage of these provisions until we cease to be an emerging growth company. We will, in general, qualify as an emerging growth company until the earliest of (a) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of our separation from InvenTrust; (b) the last day of our fiscal year in which we have an annual gross revenue of $1.0 billion or more; (c) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; and (d) the date on which we are deemed to be a "large accelerated filer" as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which would occur at such time as we (1) have an aggregate worldwide market
6
value of common equity securities held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (2) have been required to file annual and quarterly reports under the Exchange Act for a period of at least 12 months and (3) have filed at least one annual report pursuant to the Exchange Act.
As a result of our status as an emerging growth company, the information that we provide to our stockholders may be different than you might receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests.
Our Tax Status
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("the Code") for U.S. federal income tax purposes, beginning with our short taxable year that commenced on January 5, 2015 and ended on February 3, 2015. We believe that we have been organized and will operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with such short taxable year, and we intend to continue operating in such a manner. To qualify for REIT status, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we annually distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains.
We conduct our business through a traditional umbrella partnership real estate investment trust, or UPREIT, in which our hotels are indirectly owned by our Operating Partnership, through subsidiary limited partnerships, limited liability companies or other legal entities. We own and control 100% of the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership and own, directly or indirectly,
99.5%
of the operating partnership units in our Operating Partnership, with the remaining
0.5%
owned by our executive officers and members of our board of directors. In the future, we may issue additional common or preferred units in our Operating Partnership from time to time in connection with acquisitions of hotels or for financing, compensation or other reasons.
In order for the income from our hotel operations to constitute "rents from real property" for purposes of the gross income tests required for REIT qualification, we cannot directly or indirectly operate any of our hotels. Accordingly, we lease each of our hotels, and intend to lease any hotels we acquire in the future, to our TRS lessees. As required for our qualification as a REIT, our TRS lessees have engaged third-party hotel management companies to manage our hotels on market terms. Our TRS lessees pay rent to us that we intend to treat as "rents from real property". Our TRS, which owns our TRS lessees, is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes applicable to corporations.
We have made and InvenTrust has agreed to make a joint election under section 336(e) of the Code with respect to our spin-off from InvenTrust on February 3, 2015. As a result of that election, our tax basis in our assets was stepped up to the fair market value of each respective asset as of the date of the spin-off. The increased tax basis in our assets will increase the depreciation deductions we are allowed to claim over the useful life of our assets.
Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of Our Stock
Our charter authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary or appropriate to enable us to qualify as a REIT. Furthermore, our charter prohibits any one person from actually or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt (prospectively or retroactively) a person from the ownership limits if certain conditions are satisfied. However, our board of directors may not grant an exemption from the ownership limits to any proposed transferee whose ownership, direct or indirect, in excess of 9.8% of the value or number of outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock, could jeopardize our status as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with such restrictions is no longer required for us to qualify as a REIT. The ownership limits may delay or impede a transaction or a change of control that might be in your best interest.
Insurance
We or our management companies carry commercial general liability, commercial property including extended coverage and business interruption, cyber liability and umbrella liability coverage on all of our hotels and earthquake, wind, flood, hurricane and environmental coverage on hotels in areas where we believe such coverage is warranted, in each case with limits of liability that we deem adequate. Similarly, we are insured against the risk of direct physical damage in amounts we believe to be adequate to reimburse us, on a replacement basis, for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each hotel, including loss of income during the reconstruction period. We have selected policy specifications and insured limits which we believe to be appropriate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of coverage and industry practice. We do not carry insurance for generally uninsured losses, including, but not limited to, losses caused by riots, war or acts of God. We believe our hotels are adequately insured.
7
Employees
As of
December 31, 2015
, we had 47 employees. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Our third-party managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not manage employees at our hotels, we are still subject to the many costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force.
Employees at certain of our third-party managed hotels are covered by collective bargaining agreements that are subject to review and renewal on a regular basis. For a discussion of these relationships, see "Part I–Item 1A. Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Business and Industry – We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ or may employ unionized labor, which could increase our operating costs, reduce the flexibility of our hotel managers to adjust the size of the workforce at our hotels and could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability."
Where You Can Find More Information
Our internet website is located at www.xeniareit.com. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, all amendments to those reports and other filings as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC, and also make available on our website the charters for the audit, executive, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees of our board of directors and our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Copies in print of these documents are available upon request to our secretary at the address indicated on the cover of this Annual Report. We may also use our website as a distribution channel of material company information. Financial and other important information regarding the Company is routinely accessible through and posted on the "Investor Relations" page of our website. In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information about the Company when you enroll your email address by visiting the "Investor Relations" page of our website. The information on our website is not a part of, nor is it incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report.
Copies of any materials that we have filed with the SEC can be viewed at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information regarding the operations of the Public Reference Room can be obtained from the SEC by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and other information that we have filed with the SEC. The SEC website can be found at http://www.sec.gov.
8
In addition to the other information set forth in this Annual Report, you should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected by various operating risks common to the lodging industry, including competition, over-building and dependence on business travel and tourism.
We own hotels which have different economic characteristics than many other real estate assets. A typical office property, for example, has long-term leases with third-party tenants, which provides a relatively stable long-term stream of revenue. Hotels, on the other hand, generate revenue from guests that typically stay at the hotel for only a few nights, which causes the room rate and occupancy levels at each of our hotels to change every day, and results in earnings that can be highly volatile.
In addition, our hotels will be subject to various operating risks common to the lodging industry, many of which are beyond our control, including, among others, the following:
|
•
|
changes in general economic conditions, including the severity and duration of any downturn in the U.S. or global economy and financial markets;
|
|
•
|
war, political conditions or civil unrest, terrorist activities or threats and heightened travel security measures instituted in response to these events;
|
|
•
|
outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, such as norovirus, avian flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1 (swine flu), Ebola, and Zika virus;
|
|
•
|
natural or man-made disasters, such as earthquakes, like the one in Napa, California that impacted two of our lodging properties on August 24, 2014, tsunamis, tornadoes, hurricanes, typhoons, floods, oil spills, and nuclear incidents;
|
|
•
|
delayed delivery or any material reduction or prolonged interruption of public utilities and services, including water and electric power;
|
|
•
|
decreased corporate or government travel-related budgets and spending and cancellations, deferrals or renegotiations of group business due to adverse changes in general economic conditions;
|
|
•
|
decreased need for business-related travel due to innovations in business-related technology;
|
|
•
|
low consumer confidence, high levels of unemployment or depressed real estate prices;
|
|
•
|
competition from other hotels and alternative accommodations in the markets in which we operate;
|
|
•
|
over-building of hotels in the markets in which we operate, which results in increased supply and will adversely affect occupancy and revenues at our hotels;
|
|
•
|
requirements for periodic capital reinvestment to repair and upgrade hotels;
|
|
•
|
increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors that may not be offset by increased room rates;
|
|
•
|
change in interest rates and the availability, cost and terms of financing;
|
|
•
|
the financial condition and general business condition of the airline, automotive and other transportation-related industries and its impact on travel;
|
|
•
|
decreased airline capacities and routes;
|
|
•
|
oil prices and travel costs;
|
|
•
|
statements, actions or interventions by governmental officials related to travel and corporate travel-related activities and the resulting negative public perception of such travel and activities; and
|
|
•
|
risks generally associated with the ownership of hotels and real estate, as we discuss in detail below.
|
9
These factors, and the reputational repercussions of these factors, can adversely affect, and from time to time have adversely affected, individual hotels, particular regions and our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
The lodging industry is highly cyclical in nature, and we cannot assure you how long the growth period of the current lodging cycle will last.
Due to its close link with the performance of the general economy, and, specifically, growth in U.S. GDP, the lodging industry is highly cyclical in nature. Demand for products and services provided by the lodging industry generally trails improvement in economic conditions, but since 2010 the lodging industry has recovered faster and stronger than the U.S. economy generally. There can be no assurance of either any further increase in demand for hotel rooms from current levels or of the timing or extent of any such demand growth. If demand weakens, our operating results and profitability would likely be adversely affected. Though we have seen sustained improvement in economic and industry fundamentals, we cannot assure you that these conditions will continue to improve or that the recovery will remain sustainable. Worsening of the U.S. or global economy, if experienced, would likely have an adverse impact on the occupancy, ADR and RevPAR of our hotels, and would therefore adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, in an economic downturn, luxury, upper upscale and upscale hotels may be more susceptible to a decrease in revenue, as compared to hotels in other categories that have lower room rates.
In addition to general economic conditions, new hotel room supply is an important factor that can affect the lodging industry’s performance and overbuilding has the potential to further exacerbate the negative impact of an economic downturn. Room rates and occupancy, and thus RevPAR, tend to increase when demand growth exceeds supply growth. Although we believe that lodging demand growth will exceed lodging supply growth in 2016, no assurances can be made that this will be achieved or what will happen over the longer term. A reduction or slowdown in growth of lodging demand or increased growth in lodging supply could result in returns that are substantially below expectations or result in losses, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth
The seasonality of the lodging industry is expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in our revenues.
The lodging industry is seasonal in nature, which can be expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in our hotel room revenues, occupancy levels, room rates, operating expenses and cash flows. Our quarterly earnings may be adversely affected by factors outside our control, including timing of holidays, weather conditions and poor economic factors in certain markets in which we operate. The periods during which our hotels experience higher or lower levels of demand vary from property to property and depend upon location, type of property and competitive mix within the specific location. Based on historical results, we generally expect our revenue to be lower in the first quarter. This seasonality can be expected to cause periodic fluctuations in a hotel’s room revenues, occupancy levels, room rates and operating expenses. We can provide no assurances that our cash flows will be sufficient to offset any shortfalls that occur as a result of these fluctuations. As a result, we may have to enter into short-term borrowings in certain quarters in order to make distributions to our stockholders, and we can provide no assurances that such borrowings will be available on favorable terms, if at all. Consequently, volatility in our financial performance resulting from the seasonality of the lodging industry could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
The lodging industry is highly competitive. Our hotels compete with other hotels and alternative accommodations based on a number of factors, including room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels and amenities, location, brand affiliation, reputation and reservation systems. New hotels may be constructed and these additions to supply create new competitors, in some cases without corresponding increases in demand for hotel rooms. Some of our competitors also have greater financial and marketing resources than we do, which could allow them to reduce their rates, offer greater convenience, services or amenities, build new hotels in direct competition with our existing hotels, improve their properties, expand and improve their marketing efforts, all of which could adversely affect the ability of our hotels to attract prospective guests and materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. In addition, travelers can book stays on websites that facilitate the short-term rental of homes and apartments from owners, thereby providing an alternative to hotel rooms.
We also compete for hotel acquisitions with entities that have similar investment objectives as we do. This competition could limit the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us. It may also increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell to us, making it more difficult for us to acquire new properties on attractive terms or on the terms contemplated in our business plan.
10
There are inherent risks with investments in real estate, including the relative liquidity of such investments.
Investments in real estate are subject to varying degrees of risk. For example, an investment in real estate cannot generally be quickly sold, and we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any hotel we desire to for the price or on the terms set by us or acceptable to us, or the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of the hotel. Moreover, the Code imposes restrictions on a REIT’s ability to dispose of properties that are not applicable to other types of real estate companies. In particular, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our hotels for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of hotels that otherwise would be in our best interests. Therefore, we may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions and dispose of assets at opportune times or on favorable terms, which may adversely affect our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
In addition, our ability to dispose of some of our hotels could be constrained by their tax attributes. Hotels that we own for a significant period of time or that we acquire through tax-deferred contribution transactions in exchange for operating partnership units in our Operating Partnership may have low tax bases. If we dispose of these hotels outright in taxable transactions, we may be required to distribute the taxable gain to our stockholders under the requirements of the Code applicable to REITs or to pay tax on that gain, either of which, in turn, would impact our cash flow and increase our leverage. In some cases, we may be restricted from disposing of properties contributed to us in the future in exchange for our operating partnership units under tax protection agreements with contributors unless we incur additional costs related to indemnifying those contributors. To dispose of low basis or tax-protected hotels efficiently, we may from time to time use like-kind exchanges, which qualify for non-recognition of taxable gain, but can be difficult to consummate and result in the hotel for which the disposed assets are exchanged inheriting their low tax bases and other tax attributes.
Investments in real estate also are subject to adverse changes in general economic conditions. Among the factors that could impact our hotels and the value of an investment in us are:
|
•
|
risks associated with the possibility that cost increases will outpace revenue increases and that in the event of an economic slowdown, the high proportion of fixed costs will make it difficult to reduce costs to the extent required to offset declining revenues;
|
|
•
|
changes in tax laws and property taxes, or an increase in the assessed valuation of a property for real estate tax purposes;
|
|
•
|
adverse changes in the federal, state or local laws and regulations applicable to us, including those affecting zoning, fuel and energy consumption, water and environmental restrictions, and the related costs of compliance;
|
|
•
|
changing market demographics;
|
|
•
|
an inability to acquire and finance real estate assets on favorable terms, if at all;
|
|
•
|
the ongoing need for owner funded capital improvements and expenditures to maintain or upgrade hotels;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in real estate values or potential impairments in the value of our assets;
|
|
•
|
acts of God, such as earthquakes, floods or other uninsured losses; and
|
|
•
|
changes in interest rates and availability, cost and terms of financing.
|
Difficult economic conditions may continue to adversely affect the hotel industry.
The performance of the hotel industry has historically been linked to key macroeconomic indicators, such as GDP growth, employment, corporate earnings and investment, and travel demand. If the U.S. economy should falter for any reason, including the recent decline in the price of oil, and there is an extended period of economic weakness, a recession or depression, our results of operations and profitability would likely be adversely affected.
We are dependent on the performance of the third-party hotel management companies that manage the operations of each of our hotels and could be materially and adversely affected if such third-party managers do not properly manage our hotels or otherwise act in our best interests.
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, third parties must operate our hotels. We lease each of our hotels to our TRS lessees. Our TRS lessees, in turn, have entered into management agreements with third party management companies to operate our hotels. We could be materially and adversely affected if any of our third-party managers fail to provide quality services and amenities,
11
fail to maintain a quality brand name or otherwise fail to manage our hotels in our best interest, and can be financially responsible for the actions and inactions of our third-party managers pursuant to our management agreements. In addition, our hotel managers or their affiliates may manage, and in some cases may own, may have invested in or may have provided credit support or operating guarantees to hotels that compete with our hotels, any of which could result in conflicts of interest. As a result, our hotel managers may make decisions regarding competing lodging facilities that are not in our best interests. From time to time, disputes may arise between us and our third-party managers regarding their performance or compliance with the terms of the hotel management agreements, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations. If we are unable to reach satisfactory results through discussions and negotiations, we may choose to terminate our management agreement, litigate the dispute or submit the matter to third-party dispute resolution, the outcome of which may be unfavorable to us.
Under the terms of the hotel management agreements, our ability to participate in operating decisions regarding our hotels is limited to certain matters, including approval of the annual operating budget, and we do not have the authority to require any hotel to be operated in a particular manner. While our TRS lessees closely monitor the performance of our third-party managers, our general recourse under most of the hotel management agreements is limited to termination if our third-party managers are not performing adequately. For example, in many of our hotel management agreements, we have a right to terminate a management agreement if the third-party manager fails to achieve certain hotel performance criteria measured over any two consecutive fiscal years, as outlined in the applicable management agreement. However, even if a third-party manager fails to perform under the terms of its respective management agreement, it generally has the option to avoid a performance termination by paying a performance deficit fee as specified in the applicable management agreement.
In the event that we terminate any of our management agreements, we can provide no assurances that we could find a replacement manager or that any replacement manager will be successful in operating our hotels. In addition, many of our existing franchise agreements provide the franchisor with a right of first offer in the event of certain sales or transfers of a hotel and provide that the franchisor has the right to approve any change in the hotel management company engaged to manage the hotel. If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Restrictive covenants in certain of our hotel management and franchise agreements contain provisions limiting or restricting the sale of our hotels, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability.
Hotel management and franchise agreements typically contain restrictive covenants that limit or restrict our ability to sell a hotel without the consent of the hotel management company or franchisor. Many of our franchise agreements provide the franchisor with a right of first offer in the event of certain sales or transfers of a hotel and provide that the franchisor has the right to approve any change in the hotel management company engaged to manage the hotel. Generally, we may not agree to sell, lease or otherwise transfer particular hotels unless the transferee executes a new agreement or assumes the related hotel management and franchise agreements. If the hotel management company or franchisor does not consent to the sale of our hotels, we may be prohibited from taking actions that would otherwise be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
Contractual and other disagreements with or involving third-party hotel management companies and franchisors could make us liable to them or result in litigation costs or other expenses.
Our management and franchise agreements require us and third-party hotel managers and franchisors to comply with operational and performance conditions that are subject to interpretation and could result in disagreements. At any given time, we may be in disputes with one or more hotel management companies or franchisors. Any such dispute could be very expensive for us, even if the outcome is ultimately in our favor. We cannot predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation, the effect of any negative judgment against us or the amount of any settlement that we may enter into with any third-party. In the event we terminate a management or franchise agreement early and the manager or franchisor considers such termination to have been wrongful, they may seek damages. Additionally, we may be required to indemnify our third-party hotel managers and franchisors against disputes with third parties, pursuant to our management and franchise agreements. An adverse result in any of these proceedings could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
If we are unable to maintain good relationships with third-party hotel managers and franchisors, profitability could decrease and our growth potential may be adversely affected.
The success of our respective hotel investments and the value of our franchised properties largely depend on our ability to establish and maintain good relationships with the third-party hotel managers and franchisors of our respective hotel management and franchise agreements. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with third-party hotel managers and franchisors, we may be unable to renew existing management or franchise agreements or expand relationships with them. Additionally, opportunities for developing new relationships with additional third-party managers or franchisors may be adversely affected. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to execute our growth strategy.
12
If third-party hotel managers and/or franchisors consolidate through merger and acquisition transactions, we may experience undefined and unknown costs related to the integration of processes and systems, which may adversely affect our hotels.
The result of third-party hotel managers and franchisors consolidating could adversely affect our hotels due to the undefined and unknown costs associated with the integration of property level point of sale and back of house computer systems and other technology related processes, the training and other labor costs associated with the merging of labor forces, and the impact of reward point program consolidation. Additionally, the potential consolidation of third-party hotel managers and franchisors could impact our leveraging power in future management and franchise agreement negotiations.
Costs associated with, or failure to maintain, brand operating standards may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
Under the terms of our franchise agreements, and certain of our management agreements, we are required to meet specified operating standards and other terms and conditions and compliance with such standards may be costly. We expect that our franchisors will periodically inspect our hotels to ensure that we and the hotel management companies follow brand standards. Failure by us, or any hotel management company that we engage, to maintain these standards or other terms and conditions could result in a franchise license being canceled or the franchisor requiring us to undertake a costly property improvement program. If a franchise license is terminated due to our failure to make required improvements or to otherwise comply with its terms, we also may be liable to the franchisor for a termination payment, which will vary by franchisor and by hotel. If the funds required to maintain brand operating standards are significant, or if a franchise license is terminated, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
If we were to lose a brand license at one or more of our hotels, the value of the affected hotels could decline significantly and we could incur significant costs to obtain new franchise licenses, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.
If we were to lose a brand license, the underlying value of a particular hotel could decline significantly from the loss of associated name recognition, marketing support, participation in guest loyalty programs and the centralized reservation system provided by the franchisor or brand manager, which could require us to recognize an impairment on the hotel. Furthermore, the loss of a franchise license at a particular hotel could harm our relationship with the franchisor or brand manager, which could impede our ability to operate other hotels under the same brand, limit our ability to obtain new franchise licenses or brand management agreements from the franchisor or brand in the future on favorable terms, or at all, and cause us to incur significant costs to obtain a new franchise license or brand management agreement for the particular hotel. Accordingly, if we lose one or more franchise licenses or brand management agreements, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.
A substantial number of our hotels operate under the Marriott, Hilton, Kimpton or Hyatt brand families; therefore, we are subject to risks associated with concentrating our portfolio in four brand families.
In our portfolio,
45
of the
50
hotels that we own as of
December 31, 2015
operate under brands owned by Marriott, Hilton, Kimpton or Hyatt. As a result, our success is dependent in part on the continued success of Marriott, Hilton, Kimpton and Hyatt and their respective brands. We believe that building brand value is critical to increase demand and build customer loyalty. Consequently, if market recognition or the positive perception of Marriott, Hilton, Kimpton and/or Hyatt is reduced or compromised, the goodwill associated with the Marriott-, Hilton-, Kimpton- and Hyatt-branded hotels in our portfolio may be adversely affected. Furthermore, if our relationship with Marriott, Hilton, Kimpton and/or Hyatt were to deteriorate or terminate as a result of disputes regarding the management of our hotels or for other reasons, Marriott, Hilton, Kimpton and/or Hyatt could, under certain circumstances, terminate our current franchise licenses with them or decline to provide franchise licenses for hotels that we may acquire in the future. If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth and impair our ability to compete effectively.
We have a concentration of hotels in Texas and California, which exposes our business to the effects of regional events and occurrences.
We have a concentration of hotels in Texas and California. Specifically, as of
December 31, 2015
, approximately 39% of rooms in our portfolio were located in Texas and California. The concentration of hotels in a region may expose us to risks of adverse economic developments that are greater than if our portfolio were more geographically diverse. These economic developments include regional economic downturns, significant increases in the number of competitive hotels in these markets and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes in the geographic markets in which we are concentrated.
The downturn in the oil and gas industry has significantly affected demand and RevPAR in certain markets in Texas, including Houston where we have four hotels, and has adversely affected our business in those markets. A further decline could further adversely affect our
13
business and operating results in those markets.
In addition, our hotels are subject to the effects of adverse acts of nature, such as winter storms, hail storms, strong winds, earthquakes and tornadoes, which have in the past caused damage such as flooding and other damage to our hotels in specific geographic locations, including in the Texas and California markets. Depending on the severity of these acts of nature, the damage to our hotels could require closure of all or substantially all of our hotels in one or more markets for a period of time while the necessary repairs and renovations, as applicable, are undertaken. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the amount of hurricane, windstorm, earthquake, flood or other casualty insurance maintained for these hotels from time to time would entirely cover damages caused by any such event.
As a result of this geographic concentration of hotels, we will face a greater risk of a negative impact on our revenues in the event these areas are more severely impacted by adverse economic and competitive conditions and extreme weather than other areas in the United States.
The departure of any of our key personnel who have significant experience and relationships in the lodging industry could materially and adversely impede or impair our ability to compete effectively and limit future growth prospects.
We depend on the experience and relationships of our senior management team to manage our day-to-day operations and strategic business direction. Our senior management team has an extensive network of lodging industry contacts and relationships, including relationships with global and national hotel brands, hotel owners, financiers, operators, commercial real estate brokers, developers and management companies. We can provide no assurances that any of our key personnel will continue their employment with us. The loss of services of our senior management team, or any difficulty attracting and retaining other talented and experienced personnel, could adversely affect our ability to source potential investment opportunities, our relationship with global and national hotel brands and other industry participants and the execution of our business strategy. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived by financial analysts and the investment community, which could reduce the market value of our common stock.
Our long-term growth depends in part on successfully identifying and consummating acquisitions of additional hotels and the failure to make such acquisitions could materially impede our growth.
A key element of our business strategy is to invest in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels, with a focus on the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations in the U.S. We can provide no assurances that we will be successful in identifying attractive hotels or that, once identified, we will be successful in consummating an acquisition. We face significant competition for attractive investment opportunities from other well-capitalized investors, some of which have greater financial resources and a greater access to debt and equity capital to acquire hotels than we do. This competition increases as investments in real estate become increasingly attractive relative to other forms of investment. As a result of such competition, we may be unable to acquire certain hotels that we deem attractive or the purchase price may be significantly elevated or other terms may be substantially more onerous. In addition, we expect to finance future acquisitions through a combination of borrowings under our senior unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans, mortgage loans, the use of retained cash flows, and offerings of equity and debt securities, which may not be available on advantageous terms, or at all. Any delay or failure on our part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate such acquisitions could materially impede our growth.
Our acquisition, redevelopment, repositioning, renovation and re-branding activities are subject to various risks, any of which could, among other things, result in disruptions to our hotel operations, strain management resources and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.
We intend to acquire, redevelop, reposition, renovate and re-brand hotels, subject to the availability of attractive hotels or projects and our ability to undertake such activities on satisfactory terms. In deciding whether to undertake such activities, we will make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the hotel or project. However, newly acquired, redeveloped, renovated, repositioned or re-branded hotels may fail to perform as expected and the costs necessary to bring such hotels up to brand standards may exceed our expectations, which may result in the hotels’ failure to achieve projected returns.
In particular, to the extent that we engage in the activities described above, they could pose the following risks to our ongoing operations:
|
•
|
we may abandon such activities and may be unable to recover expenses already incurred in connection with exploring such opportunities;
|
|
•
|
acquired, redeveloped, renovated or re-branded hotels may not initially be accretive to our results, and we and the hotel management companies may not successfully manage newly acquired, renovated, redeveloped, repositioned or re-branded hotels to meet our expectations;
|
14
|
•
|
we may be unable to quickly, effectively and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of hotels, into our existing operations;
|
|
•
|
our redevelopment, repositioning, renovation or re-branding activities may not be completed on schedule, which could result in increased debt service and other costs and lower revenues; and
|
|
•
|
management attention may be diverted by our acquisition, redevelopment, repositioning or re-branding activities, which in some cases may turn out to be less compatible with our growth strategy than originally anticipated.
|
The occurrence of any of the foregoing events, among others, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.
Any difficulties in obtaining capital necessary to make required periodic capital expenditures and renovation of our hotels could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Ownership of hotels is a capital intensive business that requires significant capital expenditures to operate, maintain and renovate properties. Access to the capital that we need to maintain and renovate existing properties and to acquire new properties is critical to the continued growth of our business and revenues and to remain competitive. We may not be able to fund capital improvements for our existing hotels or acquisitions of new hotels solely from cash provided from our operating activities because we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to qualify as a REIT and we are subject to tax on any retained income and gains. As a result, our ability to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions or hotel redevelopment through retained earnings may be restricted. Consequently, we may have to draw down on our senior unsecured revolving credit facility or rely upon the availability of debt or equity capital to fund capital improvements and acquisitions. Our ability to access additional capital could also be limited by the terms of our senior unsecured revolving credit facility, which restricts our ability to incur debt under certain circumstances.
If we are forced to spend larger amounts of cash from operating activities than anticipated to operate, maintain or renovate existing properties, then our ability to use cash for other purposes, including acquisitions of new properties, could be limited and our profits could be reduced. Similarly, if we cannot access the capital we need to fund our operations or implement our growth strategy, we may need to postpone or cancel planned renovations or acquisitions, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and harm our business.
Many real estate costs and certain hotel operating costs are fixed, even if revenue from our hotels decreases.
Many costs, such as real estate taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance costs and certain hotel operating costs generally are more fixed than variable and as a result, are not reduced even when a hotel is not fully occupied, room rates decrease or other circumstances cause a reduction in revenues. Thus, our profits are generally more significantly affected by economic downturns and declines in revenues. If we are unable to offset these costs with sufficient revenues across our portfolio, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
Operating expenses may increase in the future, which may cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease.
Operating expenses, such as expenses for fuel, utilities, labor, employee benefits, building materials and insurance are not fixed and may increase in the future. Any increases would cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease. If we are unable to offset these decreases with sufficient revenues across our portfolio, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability and our ability to pay distributions could be materially and adversely affected.
The land underlying six of our hotels and/or meeting facilities is subject to a ground lease; if we are found to be in breach of a ground lease or are unable to renew a ground lease, we could be materially and adversely affected.
We lease the land underlying six of our hotels and/or and meeting facilities from third parties. Five of these hotels are subject to ground leases that cover all of the land underlying the respective hotel, and the sixth is subject to a ground lease that covers a portion of the land. Accordingly, we only own a long-term leasehold or similar interest in all or a portion of these six hotels. The average remaining term of the ground leases, assuming no renewal options are exercised, is approximately
44
years. Assuming all renewal options are exercised, the average remaining term is
59
years. If we are found to be in breach of a ground lease, we could lose the right to use the hotel. In addition, unless we can purchase a fee interest in the underlying land and improvements or extend the terms of these leases before their expiration, as to which no assurance can be given, we will lose our right to operate these properties and our interest in the improvements upon expiration of the leases. Our ability to exercise any extension options relating to our ground leases is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground lease at the time that we exercise such options, and we can provide no assurances that we will be able to exercise any available options at such time. Furthermore, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to renew any ground lease upon
15
its expiration. If we were to lose the right to use a hotel due to a breach or non-renewal of the ground lease, we would be unable to derive income from such hotel, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We will not recognize any increase in the value of the land or improvements subject to our ground leases and may only receive a portion of compensation paid in any eminent domain proceeding with respect to the hotel.
Unless we purchase a fee interest in the land and improvements subject to our ground leases, we will not have any economic interest in the land or improvements at the expiration of our ground leases and therefore we will not share in any increase in value of the land or improvements beyond the term of a ground lease, notwithstanding our capital outlay to purchase our interest in the hotel or fund improvements thereon, and will lose our right to use the hotel. Furthermore, if the state or federal government seizes a hotel subject to a ground lease under its eminent domain power, we may only be entitled to a portion of any compensation awarded for the seizure.
We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ or may employ unionized labor, which could increase our operating costs, reduce the flexibility of our hotel managers to adjust the size of the workforce at our hotels and could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
We have entered into management agreements with third-party hotel managers to operate our hotels. Our hotel managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not employ or manage employees at our hotels, we are subject to many of the costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force. Increased labor costs due to factors like additional taxes or requirements to incur additional employee benefits costs, including the requirements of the Affordable Care Act, may adversely impact our operating costs. Labor costs can be particularly challenging at those of our hotels with unionized labor.
From time to time, strikes, lockouts, boycotts, public demonstrations or other negative actions and publicity may disrupt hotel operations at any of our hotels, negatively impact our reputation or the reputation of our brands, cause us to lose guests, or harm relationships with the labor forces at our hotels. We also may incur increased legal costs and indirect labor costs as a result of contract disputes or other events. Additionally, hotels where our managers have collective bargaining agreements with employees could be affected more significantly by labor force activities than others. The resolution of labor disputes or new or re-negotiated labor contracts could lead to increased labor costs, either by increases in wages or benefits or by changes in work rules that raise hotel operating costs. Furthermore, labor agreements may limit the ability of our hotel managers to reduce the size of hotel workforces during an economic downturn because collective bargaining agreements are negotiated between the hotel managers and labor unions. We do not have the ability to control the outcome of these negotiations.
Additional hotels or additional departments within our hotels or groups of employees may become subject to additional collective bargaining agreements in the future. Potential changes in the federal regulatory scheme could make it easier for unions to organize groups of our third-party hotel managers' employees. If such changes take effect, more hotel personnel could be subject to increased organizational efforts, which could potentially lead to disruptions or require more of our management's time to address unionization issues. Negotiations of collective bargaining agreements, attempts by labor organizations to organize additional hotels, departments within our hotels or groups of employees or changes in labor laws could disrupt our operations, increase our labor costs or interfere with the ability of our management to focus on executing our business strategies.
Uninsured and underinsured losses at our hotels could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
We intend to maintain comprehensive insurance on each of our current hotels and any hotels that we acquire, including liability, fire and extended coverage, of the type and amount we believe are customarily obtained for or by hotel owners. There are no assurances that coverage will be available at reasonable rates. Various types of catastrophic losses, like windstorms, earthquakes and floods, and losses from foreign terrorist activities may not be insurable or may not be economically insurable. Even when insurable, these policies may have high deductibles and/or high premiums. Lenders may require such insurance. Our failure to obtain such insurance could constitute a default under loan agreements, and/or our lenders may force us to obtain such insurance at unfavorable rates, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability and revenues.
In the event of a substantial loss, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover the full current market value or replacement cost of our lost investment. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a hotel, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the hotel. In that event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the hotel. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors might also keep us from using insurance proceeds to replace or renovate a hotel after it has been damaged or destroyed. Under those circumstances, the insurance proceeds we receive might be inadequate to restore our economic position on the damaged or destroyed hotel, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability.
16
In addition, insurance risks associated with potential terrorism acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. With the enactment of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007, United States insurers cannot exclude conventional, chemical, biological, nuclear and radiation terrorism losses. These insurers must make terrorism insurance available under their property and casualty insurance policies; however, this legislation does not regulate the pricing of such insurance. In many cases, mortgage lenders have begun to insist that commercial property owners purchase coverage against terrorism as a condition of providing mortgage loans. Such insurance policies may not be available at a reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our hotels. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We may not have adequate coverage for such losses, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.
We could incur significant, material costs related to government regulation and litigation with respect to environmental matters, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.
Our hotels are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws that impose liability for contamination. Under these laws, governmental entities have the authority to require us, as the current owner of a hotel, to perform or pay for the clean-up of contamination (including hazardous substances, asbestos and asbestos-containing materials, waste or petroleum products) at, on, under or emanating from the hotel and to pay for natural resource damages arising from such contamination. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator or other responsible party knew of, or caused such contamination, and the liability may be joint and several. Because these laws also impose liability on persons who owned a property at the time it became contaminated, it is possible we could incur cleanup costs or other environmental liabilities even after we sell hotels. Contamination at, on, under or emanating from our hotels also may expose us to liability to private parties for costs of remediation and/or personal injury or property damage. In addition, environmental laws may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs to address such contamination. If contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which the properties may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Moreover, environmental contamination can affect the value of a property and, therefore, an owner’s ability to borrow funds using the property as collateral or to sell the property on favorable terms or at all. Furthermore, persons who sent waste to a waste disposal facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, may be liable for costs associated with cleanup of that facility.
In addition, our hotels are subject to various federal, state, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that address a wide variety of issues, including, but not limited to, storage tanks, air emissions from emergency generators, storm water and wastewater discharges, lead-based paint, mold and mildew, and waste management. Some of our hotels routinely handle and use hazardous or regulated substances and wastes as part of their operations, which substances and wastes are subject to regulation (e.g., swimming pool chemicals). Our hotels incur costs to comply with these environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and could be subject to fines and penalties for non-compliance with applicable requirements.
Certain of our hotels contain, and those that we acquire in the future may contain, or may have contained, asbestos-containing material, or "ACM." Federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws require that ACM be properly managed and maintained, and include requirements to undertake special precautions, such as removal or abatement, if ACM would be disturbed during maintenance, renovation or demolition of a building. Such laws regarding ACM may impose fines and penalties on building owners, employers and operators for failure to comply with these requirements. In addition, third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos-containing building materials.
When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Indoor air quality issues can also stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contamination from indoor or outdoor sources, and other biological contaminants such as pollen, viruses and bacteria. Indoor exposure to airborne toxins or irritants above certain levels can be alleged to cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our hotels could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants from the affected property or increase indoor ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability to third parties if property damage or personal injury occurs.
Liabilities and costs associated with environmental contamination at, on, under or emanating from our properties, defending against claims related to alleged or actual environmental issues, or complying with environmental, health and safety laws could be material and could materially and adversely affect us. We can make no assurances that changes in current laws or regulations or future laws or regulations will not impose additional or new material environmental liabilities or that the current
17
environmental condition of our hotels will not be affected by our operations, the condition of the properties in the vicinity of our hotels, or by third parties unrelated to us. The discovery of material environmental liabilities at our properties could subject us to unanticipated significant costs, which could significantly reduce or eliminate our profitability and the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Accessibility Guidelines promulgated thereunder, which we refer to collectively as the ADA, all public accommodations must meet various federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with the ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers, and non-compliance could result in the U.S. government imposing fines or in private litigants winning damages.
Our hotels also are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements would require significant unanticipated expenditures that would affect our cash flow and results of operations. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or other safety regulations and requirements, it could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to recently acquired hotels and the hotels that we may acquire in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability growth.
Our recently acquired hotels, and the hotels that we may acquire in the future, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements related to the purchase of the hotels we acquire may not survive the completion of the transactions. Furthermore, indemnification under such agreements may be limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with these hotels may exceed our expectations, and we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
Adverse judgments or settlements resulting from legal proceedings in which we may be involved in the normal course of our business could reduce our profits or limit our ability to operate our business.
In the normal course of our business, we are involved in various legal proceedings. Our third-party managers, whom we indemnify for legal costs resulting from management of our hotels, may also be involved in various legal proceedings relating to the management of our hotels. The outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted. If any of these proceedings were to be determined adversely to us or our third-party managers or a settlement involving a payment of a material sum of money were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our profits or ability to operate our business. Additionally, we could become the subject of future claims by third parties, including current or former third-party property owners, guests who use our properties, our employees, our investors or regulators. Any significant adverse judgments or settlements would reduce our profits and could limit our ability to operate our business. Further, we may incur costs related to claims for which we have appropriate third party indemnity, but such third parties fail to fulfill their contractual obligations.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of integrated internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results.
In connection with operating as a public company, we are required to provide reliable financial statements and reports to our stockholders. To monitor the accuracy and reliability of our financial reporting, we established an internal audit function that oversees our internal controls. We have established, or caused our third-party hotel management companies to establish, controls and procedures designed to ensure that hotel revenues and expenses are properly recorded at our hotels. While we have undertaken substantial work to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Section 404(b), which could be applicable in 2016, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in maintaining effective internal control over our financial reporting and may determine in the future that our existing internal controls need improvement. If we fail to comply with proper overall controls, we could be materially harmed or we could fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, the existence of a material weakness or significant deficiency in our internal controls could result in errors in our financial statements that could require a restatement, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, result in increased costs to remediate any deficiencies, attract regulatory scrutiny or lawsuits and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could lead to a substantial decline in the market price of our common stock.
18
As an "emerging growth company," we are permitted to rely on exemptions from certain reporting and disclosure requirements, which may make our future public filings different than that of other public companies.
We are an "emerging growth company" as defined in the JOBS Act, and we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting and disclosure requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not emerging growth companies. We will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, or until the earliest of: (1) the last date of the fiscal year during which we had total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more; (2) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt; or (3) the date on which we are deemed to be a "large accelerated filer" as defined under Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to:
|
•
|
have an auditor attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
|
|
•
|
submit certain executive compensation matters to stockholder advisory votes pursuant to the "say on frequency" and "say on pay" provisions (requiring a non-binding stockholder vote to approve compensation of certain executive officers) and the "say on golden parachute" provisions (requiring a non-binding stockholder vote to approve golden parachute arrangements for certain executive officers in connection with mergers and certain other business combinations) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010; or
|
|
•
|
disclose certain executive compensation related items.
|
If we choose to take advantage of any or all of these exemptions, the information that we provide you in our future public filings may be different than that of other public companies. The exact implications of the JOBS Act for us are still subject to interpretations and guidance by the SEC and other regulatory agencies. In addition, as our business grows, we may no longer satisfy the conditions of an emerging growth company. We continue to evaluate and monitor developments with respect to these new rules and we cannot assure you that we will be able to take advantage of all of the benefits of the JOBS Act.
In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company may take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies. This means that an emerging growth company can delay adopting certain accounting standards until such standards are otherwise applicable to private companies. We elected to opt out of this transition period, and will therefore comply with new or revised accounting standards on the applicable dates on which the adoption of these standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. This election is irrevocable.
Market disruptions may adversely impact many aspects of our operating results and operating condition.
During the global economic downturn that began in 2008, the domestic financial markets experienced unusual volatility, uncertainty and a tightening of liquidity in both the debt and equity capital markets. Credit spreads for major sources of capital widened significantly during the U.S. credit crisis as investors demanded a higher risk premium. If there is volatility and weakness in the capital and credit markets, the availability of debt financing secured by commercial real estate could decline. Our business may be affected by market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. or global economy or real estate industry as a whole or by the local economic conditions in the markets in which our hotels are located, including the dislocations in the credit markets and general global economic recession. Specifically, these conditions may have the following consequences:
|
•
|
credit spreads for major sources of capital may widen if stockholders demand higher risk premiums or interest rates could increase, due to inflationary expectations, resulting in an increased cost for debt financing;
|
|
•
|
our ability to borrow on terms and conditions that we find acceptable may be limited, which could result in our hotels generating lower overall economic returns and a reduced level of cash flow from what was anticipated at the time we acquired the asset, which could potentially impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, or pursue acquisition opportunities, among other things;
|
|
•
|
the amount of capital that is available to finance hotels could diminish, which, in turn, could lead to a decline in hotel values generally, slow hotel transaction activity, and reduce the loan to value ratio upon which lenders are willing to lend;
|
|
•
|
the value of certain of our hotels may decrease below the amounts we paid for them, which would limit our ability to dispose of hotels at attractive prices or to obtain debt financing secured by these hotels and could reduce our ability to finance our business;
|
19
|
•
|
the value and liquidity of short-term investments, if any, could be reduced as a result of the dislocation of the markets for our short-term investments and increased volatility in market rates for these investments or other factors; and
|
|
•
|
one or more counterparties to derivative financial instruments that we may enter into could default on their obligations to us, or could fail, increasing the risk that we may not realize the benefits of these instruments.
|
For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our investments.
We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and potential cyber-attacks, security problems, or other disruptions present risks.
The third-party hotel management companies that operate our hotels rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes, including financial transactions and records, personal identifying information, reservations, billing and operating data. They may purchase some of their information technology from vendors, on whom our systems will depend, and the third-party hotel managers will rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmission and storage of confidential operator and other customer information. We will depend upon the secure transmission of this information over public networks. Our third-party hotel management companies’ networks and storage applications may be subject to unauthorized access by hackers or others through cyber-attacks, which are rapidly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated, or by other means, or may be breached due to operator error, malfeasance or other system disruptions. In some cases, it will be difficult to anticipate or immediately detect such incidents and the damage caused thereby. Any significant breakdown, invasion, destruction, interruption or leakage of our third-party hotel managers’ systems could harm us, and we may be financially responsible for certain damages arising out of the harm such events cause to third parties pursuant to our management agreements. As a result, such incidents could have a material impact on our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in distribution channels, including the increasing use of intermediaries by consumers and companies may adversely affect our profitability.
Our rooms are booked through a variety of distribution channels, including hotel websites, travel agents, internet travel intermediaries and meeting procurement firms. If bookings shift to higher cost distribution channels, including internet travel intermediaries and meeting procurement firms, it could materially impact our profits. Additionally, as intermediary bookings increase, these intermediaries may be able to obtain higher commissions, reduced room rates or other significant contract concessions from our brands and management companies. Many of these internet travel intermediaries are viewed as offering hotel rooms in a commodity-like manner, by increasing the importance of price and general indicators of quality (such as "three-star downtown hotel") at the expense of brand identification. It is possible that consumers and companies will develop brand loyalties to their reservations systems and multi-brand representation rather than to the brands under which our properties are operated. Although most of the business for our hotels is expected to be derived from traditional channels, if the amount of sales made through the intermediaries increases significantly, room revenues may be lower than expected, and/or expenses may be higher which would adversely affect our profitability.
Risks Related to Our Relationship with InvenTrust and the Separation
Our historical financial results as a subsidiary of InvenTrust may not be representative of our results as a separate, stand-alone company.
The historical financial information prior to our spin-off that we have included in this Annual Report has been derived from InvenTrust’s consolidated financial statements and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations or cash flows would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented. Although InvenTrust did account for our company as a subsidiary, InvenTrust did not account for us, and we were not operated, as a separate, stand-alone company for the historical periods presented. The historical costs and expenses reflected in our combined consolidated financial statements include an allocation for certain corporate functions historically provided by InvenTrust including general corporate expenses, employee benefits and incentives, and interest expense. These allocations were based on what we and InvenTrust considered to be reasonable reflections of the historical utilization levels of these services required in support of our business. The historical information does not necessarily indicate what our results of operations, financial position, cash flows or costs and expenses will be in the future.
20
We may have potential business conflicts of interest with InvenTrust with respect to our past and ongoing relationships.
Conflicts of interest may arise between InvenTrust and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships, including:
|
•
|
labor, tax, employee benefit, indemnification and other matters arising from our separation from InvenTrust;
|
|
•
|
intellectual property matters;
|
|
•
|
employee recruiting and retention;
|
|
•
|
sales or distributions by InvenTrust of all or any portion of its ownership interest in us, which could be to one of our competitors;
|
|
•
|
business combinations involving our company; and
|
|
•
|
business opportunities that may be attractive to both InvenTrust and us.
|
We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts, and, even if we do so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with a party that was not historically our parent company.
Potential indemnification liabilities to InvenTrust pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement could materially adversely affect our operations.
The Separation and Distribution Agreement with InvenTrust provides for, among other things, the allocation between us and InvenTrust of InvenTrust’s assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods prior to, at and after the separation, and provisions governing our relationships with InvenTrust following the separation and distribution. Among other things, the Separation and Distribution Agreement provides indemnification obligations designed to make us financially responsible for all liabilities that may exist relating to the "Xenia Business", which consists of the business, operations and activities relating primarily to our portfolio and any other hotels previously owned by Xenia or InvenTrust prior to the separation, other than the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, whether incurred prior to, at or after the separation and distribution. With respect to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, notwithstanding the foregoing, we have agreed to assume the first $8 million of liabilities (including any related fees and expenses) incurred following the distribution relating to, arising out of or resulting from the ownership, operation or sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio and that relate to, arise out of or result from a claim or demand that is made against Xenia or InvenTrust by any person who is not a party or an affiliate of a party to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, other than liabilities arising from the breach or alleged breach by InvenTrust of certain fundamental representations made by InvenTrust to the third party purchasers of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We have also agreed to assume and indemnify InvenTrust for certain tax liabilities attributable to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. As part of our working capital at the time of distribution, InvenTrust left us with cash estimated to be sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations. As a result, we may be responsible for substantial liabilities under the Separation and Distribution Agreement.
In connection with our separation from InvenTrust, InvenTrust has agreed to indemnify us for certain pre-distribution liabilities and liabilities related to InvenTrust assets. However, there can be no assurance that these indemnities will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that InvenTrust’s ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the future.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, InvenTrust has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities related to InvenTrust assets. However, third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that InvenTrust agrees to retain, and there can be no assurance that InvenTrust will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from InvenTrust any amounts for which we are held liable, such indemnification may be insufficient to fully offset the financial impact of such liabilities and/or we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from InvenTrust.
Our agreements with InvenTrust may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations among unaffiliated third parties.
The agreements related to our separation from InvenTrust, including the Separation and Distribution Agreement, Transition Services Agreement and Employee Matters Agreement, were negotiated in the context of our separation from InvenTrust while we were still part of and a wholly-owned subsidiary of InvenTrust and, accordingly, may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations among unaffiliated third parties. The terms of the agreements we negotiated in the context of our separation related to, among other things, allocations of assets, liabilities, rights, indemnifications and other
21
obligations among InvenTrust and us. For example, when the terms of these agreements were negotiated, we did not have a board of directors that was independent from InvenTrust. See "Part II-Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence."
Volatility in the financial markets and challenging economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to secure debt financing on attractive terms and our ability to service any future indebtedness that we may incur.
The domestic and international commercial real estate debt markets could become very volatile as a result of, among other things, the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies. This could result in less availability of credit and increasing costs for what is available. If the overall cost of borrowing increases, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, the increased costs may result in existing assets or future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution. If these disruptions in the debt markets were to persist, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets could be negatively impacted. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and the return on the properties we do purchase may be lower. In addition, we may find it difficult, costly or impossible to refinance indebtedness which is maturing.
Further, economic conditions could negatively impact commercial real estate fundamentals and result in declining values in our real estate portfolio and in the collateral securing any loan investments we may make, which could have various negative impacts. Specifically, the value of collateral securing any loan investment we may make could decrease below the outstanding principal amounts of such loans, requiring us to pledge more collateral.
Our organizational documents have no limitation on the amount of indebtedness we may incur. As a result, we may become highly leveraged in the future, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Our business strategy contemplates the use of both non-recourse secured and unsecured debt to finance long-term growth. In addition, our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of debt that we may incur, and our board of directors may change our financing policy at any time without stockholder notice or approval. As a result, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, in the future. Incurring debt could subject us to many risks, including the risks that:
|
•
|
our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest;
|
|
•
|
our debt and resulting maturities may increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
|
•
|
we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders, funds available for operations and capital expenditures, future business opportunities or other purposes;
|
|
•
|
the terms of any refinancing may not be in the same amount or on terms as favorable as the terms of the existing debt being refinanced;
|
|
•
|
we may be obligated to repay the debt pursuant to guarantee obligations; and
|
|
•
|
the use of leverage could adversely affect our ability to raise capital from other sources or to make distributions to our stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
|
If we violate covenants in future agreements relating to indebtedness that we may incur, we could be required to repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. In addition, indebtedness agreements may require that we meet certain covenant tests in order to make distributions to our stockholders.
If we are unable to repay or refinance our existing debt, we may be unable to sustain or increase distributions to our stockholders and our share price may be adversely affected.
Our existing and future debt may subject us to many risks, including the risks that:
|
•
|
our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest;
|
|
•
|
our debt may increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
22
|
•
|
we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders, funds available for operations and capital expenditures, future business opportunities or other purposes;
|
|
•
|
the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of the debt being refinanced; and
|
|
•
|
the terms of our debt may limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and therefore adversely affect the market price of our shares.
|
If we do not have sufficient funds to repay our debt at maturity, it may be necessary to refinance this debt through additional debt financing, or private or public offerings of debt or equity securities. Alternatively, we may need to sell the underlying hotel or, in certain instances, the lender may foreclose. Adverse economic conditions could cause the terms on which we borrow or refinance to be unfavorable. If we are unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms, we may be forced to dispose of hotels on disadvantageous terms or at times which may not permit us to receive an attractive return on our investments, potentially resulting in losses adversely affecting cash flow from operating activities.
Borrowings may reduce the funds available for distribution and increase the risk of loss since defaults may cause us to lose the properties securing the loans.
We acquired properties by borrowing monies and we may, in some instances, acquire properties by assuming existing financing. We typically borrow money to finance a portion of the purchase price of assets we acquire. We may also borrow money for other purposes to, among other things, satisfy the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our "REIT annual taxable income," subject to certain adjustments, or as is otherwise necessary or advisable to assure that we continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Over the long term, however, payments required on any amounts we borrow reduce the funds available for, among other things, acquisitions, capital expenditures for existing properties or distributions to our stockholders because cash otherwise available for these purposes is used to pay principal and interest on this debt.
If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from a property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on a property, then the amount of cash flow from operations available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In such a case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of our investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure is treated as a sale of the property or properties for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the property or properties. If the outstanding balance of the debt exceeds our tax basis in the property or properties, we would recognize taxable gain on the foreclosure action and we would not receive any cash proceeds. We also may fully or partially guarantee any monies that subsidiaries borrow to purchase or operate properties. In these cases, we will likely be responsible to the lender for repaying the loans if the subsidiary is unable to do so. If any mortgage contains cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, more than one property may be affected by a default.
If we are unable to borrow at favorable rates, we may not be able to acquire new properties.
If we are unable to borrow money at favorable rates, we may be unable to acquire additional real estate assets or refinance existing loans at maturity. Further, we may enter into loan agreements or other credit arrangements that require us to pay interest on amounts we borrow at variable or "adjustable" rates. Increases in interest rates will increase our interest costs. If interest rates are higher when we refinance our loans, our expenses will increase, thereby reducing our cash flow and the amount available for distribution to you. Further, during periods of rising interest rates, we may be forced to sell one or more of our properties in order to repay existing loans, which may not permit us to maximize the return on the particular properties being sold.
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and ultimately may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
We have obtained, and may continue to enter into, mortgage indebtedness that does not require us to pay principal for all or a portion of the life of the debt instrument. During the period when no principal payments are required, the amount of each scheduled payment is less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan is not reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal required during this period. After the interest-only period, we may be required either to make scheduled payments of principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or "balloon" payment at or prior to maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan if we do not have funds available or are unable to refinance the obligatio
n.
23
Existing and future debt agreements contain or may contain restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business.
The mortgages on our existing hotels, and hotels that we may acquire in the future likely will, contain customary covenants such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the applicable hotel or to discontinue insurance coverage. In addition, such loans contain negative covenants that, among other things, preclude certain changes of control, inhibit our ability to incur additional indebtedness or, under certain circumstances, restrict cash flow necessary to make distributions to our stockholders. These loans also often have debt service coverage ratio requirements that could limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
The credit agreements governing our senior unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loans contain customary covenants with which we must comply, which limit the discretion of management with respect to certain business matters. These covenants place restrictions on, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on assets, enter into new types of businesses, engage in mergers, liquidations or consolidations, sell assets, make restricted payments (including the payment of dividends and other distributions) after the occurrence and during the continuance of a default or event of default, enter into negative pledges or limitations on the ability of subsidiaries to make certain distributions or to guarantee the indebtedness under the credit agreement, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, enter into speculative hedging transactions, change our fiscal year and make certain payments and prepayments with respect to subordinated debt. The credit agreements also contain financial covenants relating to our maximum total leverage ratio, maximum secured leverage ratio, maximum secured recourse leverage ratio, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum consolidated tangible net worth, minimum unsecured interest coverage ratio and setting a minimum number of unencumbered properties we must own and a minimum value for such unencumbered properties. Any other credit facility or secured loans that we enter into may place additional restrictions on us and may require us to meet certain financial ratios and tests. Our continued ability to borrow under the revolving credit facility and any other credit facility that we may obtain will be subject to compliance with these covenants and our ability to meet these covenants will be adversely affected if U.S. lodging fundamentals do not continue to improve when and to the extent that we expect. In addition, our failure to comply with these covenants, as well as our inability to make required payments under the credit agreement or any future debt agreement, could cause an event of default under the credit agreement, which, if not waived, could result in the termination of the financing commitments under the credit agreement and the acceleration of the maturity of the outstanding indebtedness thereunder, or could cause an event of default under such future debt agreement, which could result in the acceleration of the debt and require us to repay such debt with capital obtained from other sources, which may not be available to us or may be available only on unattractive terms. Furthermore, if we default on secured debt, lenders can take possession of the hotel or hotels securing such debt. In addition, the credit agreements contain, and any future debt agreements may contain, cross-default provisions with respect to certain other recourse and non-recourse indebtedness and contain certain other events of default which would similarly, in each case, give the lenders under the credit agreements the right to terminate such financing commitments and accelerate the maturity of such indebtedness under the credit agreements or give the lenders under such other agreement the right to declare a default on its debt and to enforce remedies, including acceleration of the maturity of such debt upon the occurrence of a default under such other indebtedness. If we default on our credit agreements or any other debt agreements, it could materially and adversely affect us.
In addition, in connection with our mortgage agreements we may enter into lockbox and cash management agreements pursuant to which substantially all of the income generated by our hotel properties will be deposited directly into lockbox accounts and then swept into cash management accounts for the benefit of our lenders and from which cash will be distributed to us only after funding of certain items, which may include payment of principal and interest on our debt, insurance and tax reserves or escrows and other expenses. As a result, we may be forced to borrow additional funds in order to make distributions to our stockholders (including, potentially, to make distributions necessary to allow us to qualify as a REIT).
We may be unable to satisfy our debt obligations upon a change of control.
Under the documents that govern our indebtedness, if we experience a change of control, we could be required to incur certain penalties, fees and other expenses, which may include repayment of the entire principal balance of some of our outstanding indebtedness plus additional fees and interest. We might not have sufficient funds to repay such amounts. Any of these events could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, results of operations and financial condition.
Covenants applicable to current or future debt could restrict our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and, as a result, we may be unable to make distributions necessary to qualify as a REIT, which could materially and adversely affect us and the market price of our common stock.
We intend to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gain, each year to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy this
24
distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under the Code. If, as a result of covenants applicable to our current or future debt, we are restricted from making distributions to our stockholders, we may be unable to make distributions necessary for us to avoid U.S. federal corporate income and excise taxes and maintain our qualification as a REIT, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
We have borrowed money, which bears interest at variable rates, and therefore are exposed to increases in costs in a rising interest rate environment. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense on any variable rate debt, as well as any debt that must be refinanced at higher interest rates at the time of maturity. Our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected due to the increased requirement to service our debt and could reduce the amount we are able to distribute to our stockholders. As of
December 31, 2015
, approximately
$583.3 million
, or
51.6%
of the total debt outstanding bore interest at variable rates which was not hedged by interest rate protection agreements.
We may be contractually obligated to purchase property even if we are unable to secure financing for the acquisition.
We may finance all or a portion of the purchase price for properties that we acquire. However, to ensure that our offers are as competitive as possible, we do not expect to enter into contracts to purchase property that include financing contingencies. Thus, we may be contractually obligated to purchase a property even if we are unable to secure financing for the acquisition. In this event, we may choose to close on the property by using cash on hand, which would result in less cash available for our operations and distributions to stockholders. Alternatively, we may choose not to close on the acquisition of the property and default on the purchase contract. If we default on any purchase contract, we could lose our earnest money and become subject to liquidated or other contractual damages and remedies.
To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective.
To the extent consistent with qualifying as a REIT, from time to time, we may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from our currently anticipated hedging strategy. There is no assurance that our hedging strategy will achieve our objectives. We may be subject to costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if we terminate these arrangements.
To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. If the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty, which creates a risk that we may not be able to pay such amounts. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract, increasing the risk that we may not realize the benefits of these instruments. There is a risk that counterparties could fail, shut down, file for bankruptcy or be unable to pay out contracts. The failure of a counterparty that holds collateral that we post in connection with an interest rate swap agreement could result in the loss of that collateral.
There can be no assurance that the direct or indirect effects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act will not have an adverse effect on our interest rate hedging activities.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act contains a sweeping overhaul of the regulation of privately negotiated derivatives. The provisions of Title VII became effective on July 16, 2011 or, with respect to particular provisions, on such other date specified in the Dodd-Frank Act or by subsequent rulemaking. Pursuant to the regulatory framework established by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or the CFTC, has been granted broad regulatory authority over "swaps," which term has been defined in the Dodd-Frank Act and related CFTC rules to include interest rate derivatives such as the ones we may use in our interest rate hedging activities. While the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our interest rate hedging activities cannot be fully assessed until all final implementing rules and regulations are promulgated, the requirements of Title VII may affect our ability to enter into hedging or other risk management transactions, may increase our costs in entering into such transactions, and/or may result in us entering into such transactions on less favorable terms than prior to effectiveness of the Dodd-Frank Act. For example, subject to an exception for end-users of swaps upon which we may seek to
25
rely, we may be required to clear certain interest rate hedging transactions by submitting them to a derivatives clearing organization. In addition, to the extent we are required to clear any such transactions, we will be required to, among other things, post margin in connection with such transactions. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events may have an adverse effect on our business and our stockholders’ return.
Risks Related to Our Status as REIT
Failure to qualify as a REIT, or failure to remain qualified as a REIT, would cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, which would substantially reduce funds available for distributions to our stockholders.
We believe that our organization and proposed method of operation will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT beginning with our short taxable year that commenced on January 5, 2015 and ended on February 3, 2015. However, we cannot assure you that we will qualify and remain qualified as a REIT.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available for distributions to our stockholders because:
|
•
|
we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates;
|
|
•
|
we could be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes; and
|
|
•
|
unless we are entitled to relief under certain U.S. federal income tax laws, we could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.
|
In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will no longer be required to make distributions. As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and it would adversely affect the value of our common stock.
If InvenTrust failed to qualify as a REIT in its 2011 through 2015 taxable years, we would be prevented from electing to qualify as a REIT.
We believe that from the time of our formation until January 5, 2015, we were treated as a "qualified REIT subsidiary" of InvenTrust. Under applicable Treasury regulations, if InvenTrust failed, or fails, to qualify as a REIT in its 2011 through 2015 taxable years, unless InvenTrust’s failure was subject to relief under U.S. federal income tax laws, we would be prevented from electing to qualify as a REIT prior to the fifth calendar year following the year in which InvenTrust failed to qualify.
We have made and InvenTrust has agreed to make a joint tax election that, among other things, caused us to have a short taxable year that ended on February 3, 2015 and if we failed to qualify as a REIT for that short taxable year, we would be liable for a material corporate income tax and would be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the following four taxable years.
We have made and InvenTrust has agreed to make a joint election under section 336(e) of the Code with respect to our spin-off from InvenTrust on February 3, 2015, which allowed us to significantly increase our tax basis in our assets. As a result of that election, among other things, we were deemed to sell all of our assets to a third party and liquidate on February 3, 2015, the date of the spin-off. The gain we recognized in that deemed sale that was attributable to the personal property at our hotels was not qualifying income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests applicable to REITs. Based on our valuation of our personal property, we believe that we satisfied the 75% and 95% gross income tests for our short taxable year that ended on February 3, 2015.
No complete assurance can be provided that the IRS would not disagree with our valuation of our personal property and our determination of the gain from the deemed sale of that property. If the IRS successfully asserted that we failed to satisfy one or more of the requirements for REIT qualification for our short taxable year ended on February 3, 2015, we would be able to maintain our REIT status only if we were able to qualify for a REIT "savings clause." We have been advised by counsel that, even if we failed the gross income tests as a result of the IRS successfully disagreeing with the valuation of our personal property, we will be able to qualify for a REIT "savings clause". To qualify for the REIT "savings clause," we would have to pay a penalty tax, which could be material. Moreover, an opinion of legal counsel reflects only the counsel's best judgment on a legal issue and is not binding on a court. Accordingly, no such assurance can be provided that we will qualify for the REIT "savings clause." If the IRS successfully disagreed with our valuation of our personal property and we did not qualify for the REIT "savings clause," we would be subject to corporate income tax on the deemed sale of our assets pursuant to the section 336(e) election, and that corporate income tax would be material. In addition, we would be precluded from electing REIT status for the four taxable years following that failure.
26
Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flows
.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. In addition, our TRS, and any other TRS we form, will be subject to regular corporate federal, state and local taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distributions to stockholders.
Failure to make required distributions would subject us to federal corporate income tax.
We intend to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, each year to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under the Code.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and may force us to borrow funds or sell assets during unfavorable market conditions.
To satisfy the REIT distribution requirements, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis or sell assets, even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings or sales. Our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to fund required distributions as a result of differences in timing between the actual receipt of income and the recognition of income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt service or amortization payments. The insufficiency of our cash flows to cover our distribution requirements could have an adverse impact on our ability to raise short- and long-term debt or sell equity securities in order to fund distributions required to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
The ownership of our TRS and our TRS lessees increases our overall tax liability.
Our TRS and any other of our domestic TRSs will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax on their taxable income, which will consist of the revenues from the hotels leased by our TRS lessees, net of the operating expenses for such hotels and rent payments to us. Accordingly, although our ownership of our TRS lessees will allow us to participate in the operating income from our hotels in addition to receiving rent, that operating income will be fully subject to income tax. The after-tax net income of our TRS lessees is available for distribution to us. If we have any non-U.S. TRSs, then they may be subject to tax in jurisdictions where they operate.
Our TRS lessee structure subjects us to the risk of increased hotel operating expenses that could adversely affect our operating results and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Our leases with our TRS lessees require our TRS lessees to pay us rent based in part on revenues from our hotels. Our operating risks include decreases in hotel revenues and increases in hotel operating expenses, including but not limited to the increases in wage and benefit costs, repair and maintenance expenses, energy costs, property taxes, insurance costs and other operating expenses, which would adversely affect our TRS lessees’ ability to pay us rent due under the leases.
Increases in these operating expenses can have a significant adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, the market price of our common shares and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Our ownership of our TRS, and any other TRSs we form, will be subject to limitations and our transactions with our TRS, and any other TRSs we form, will cause us to be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain income or deductions if those transactions are not conducted on arm’s-length terms.
Overall, no more than 25% (or 20% for the taxable years ending after December 31, 2017) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, the Code limits the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The Code also imposes a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. The 100% tax would apply, for example, to the extent that we were found to have charged our TRS lessees rent in excess of an arm’s-length rent. Furthermore, we will monitor the value of our respective investments in our TRS for the purpose of ensuring compliance with TRS ownership limitations and will structure our transactions with our TRS on terms that we believe are arm’s length to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to comply with the 25% (or 20%) TRS limitation or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax.
27
If the leases of our hotels to our TRS lessees are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will fail to qualify as a REIT.
To qualify as a REIT, we must annually satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be derived from certain sources, such as "rents from real property." Rents paid to our Operating Partnership by our TRS lessees pursuant to the leases of our hotels will constitute substantially all of our gross income. In order for such rent to qualify as "rents from real property" for purposes of the gross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, financing arrangements, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. If our leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will fail to qualify as a REIT.
If any of our current and future hotel management companies do not qualify as "eligible independent contractors," or if our hotels are not "qualified lodging facilities," we will fail to qualify as a REIT.
Rent paid by a lessee that is a "related party tenant" of ours will not be qualifying income for purposes of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs. An exception is provided, however, for leases of "qualified lodging facilities" to a TRS so long as the hotels are managed by an "eligible independent contractor" and certain other requirements are satisfied. We expect to lease all or substantially all of our hotels to our TRS lessees and to engage hotel management companies that qualify as "eligible independent contractors." Among other requirements, in order to qualify as an eligible independent contractor, the hotel manager must not own, directly or through its stockholders, more than 35% of our outstanding shares, and no person or group of persons can own more than 35% of our outstanding shares and the shares (or ownership interest) of the hotel manager, taking into account certain ownership attribution rules. The ownership attribution rules that apply for purposes of these 35% thresholds are complex, and monitoring actual and constructive ownership of our shares by our hotel managers and their owners may not be practical. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that these ownership levels will not be exceeded.
In addition, for a hotel management company to qualify as an eligible independent contractor, such company or a related person must be actively engaged in the trade or business of operating "qualified lodging facilities" (as defined below) for one or more persons not related to the REIT or its TRSs at each time that such company enters into a hotel management contract with a TRS or its TRS lessee. We believe our current hotel managers operate qualified lodging facilities for certain persons who are not related to us or our TRS. However, no assurances can be provided that any of our current and future hotel managers will in fact comply with this requirement. Failure to comply with this requirement would require us to find other managers for future contracts, and, if we hired a management company without knowledge of the failure, it could jeopardize our status as a REIT.
Finally, each property with respect to which our TRS lessees pay rent must be a "qualified lodging facility." A "qualified lodging facility" is a hotel, motel or other establishment more than one-half of the dwelling units in which are used on a transient basis, including customary amenities and facilities, provided that no wagering activities are conducted at or in connection with such facility by any person who is engaged in the business of accepting wagers and who is legally authorized to engage in such business at or in connection with such facility. We believe that the hotels that are leased to our TRS lessees are qualified lodging facilities. Although we intend to monitor future acquisitions and improvements of properties, REIT provisions of the Code provide only limited guidance for making determinations under the requirements for qualified lodging facilities, and there can be no assurance that these requirements will be satisfied.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to forgo and/or liquidate otherwise attractive investment opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 25% of the value of our assets can consist of debt of publicly offered REITs that is not secured by real property, and no more than 25% (or 20% for taxable years ending after December 31, 2017) of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio, or contribute to a TRS, otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, we may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, and may be unable to pursue investments that would otherwise be advantageous to us in order to satisfy the
28
source of income or asset diversification requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make, and, in certain cases, maintain ownership of, certain attractive investments.
You may be restricted from acquiring or transferring certain amounts of our common stock.
The stock ownership restrictions of the Code for REITs and the 9.8% stock ownership limit in our charter may inhibit market activity in our capital stock and restrict our business combination opportunities.
In order to qualify as a REIT for each taxable year after our first taxable year as a REIT, five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code, may not own, beneficially or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding stock at any time during the last half of a taxable year. Attribution rules in the Code determine if any individual or entity beneficially or constructively owns our capital stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our capital stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year for each taxable year after our first taxable year as a REIT. To help insure that we meet these tests, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of shares of our capital stock.
Our charter authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of directors (prospectively or retroactively), our charter prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. Our board of directors may not grant an exemption from these restrictions to any proposed transferee whose ownership in excess of 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares would result in our failing to qualify as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply, however, if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance is no longer required in order for us to qualify as a REIT.
We may pay taxable dividends in our common stock and cash, in which case stockholders may sell shares of our common stock to pay tax on such dividends, placing downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash and common stock at the election of each stockholder. If we made a taxable dividend payable in cash and common stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, stockholders may be required to pay income tax with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the common stock that it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our common stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in common stock. If we made a taxable dividend payable in cash and our common stock and a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our common stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. We do not currently intend to pay
a taxable dividend in our common stock and cash
.
Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
The maximum tax rate applicable to "qualified dividend income" payable to U.S. stockholders that are taxed at individual rates is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates on qualified dividend income. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are taxed at individual rates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends treated as qualified dividend income, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge the risks inherent to our operations. Under current law, any income that we generate from derivatives or other transactions intended to hedge our interest rate risk with respect to borrowings made, or to be made, to acquire or carry real estate assets generally will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% and 95% income requirements applicable to REITs. In addition, any income from certain other qualified hedging transactions would generally not constitute gross income for purposes of both the 75% and 95% income tests. However, we may be required to limit the use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous, which could result in greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur.
29
The ability of our board of directors to revoke our REIT qualification without stockholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.
Our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to attempt to, or continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to be a REIT, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and would no longer be required to distribute most of our taxable income to our stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our stockholders.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our common stock.
At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation, or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation, or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock and our Corporate Structure
The market price of our shares may fluctuate widely and there can be no assurance that the market for our stock will provide you with adequate liquidity.
Prior to our separation from InvenTrust there was no public market for our common stock, and we cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade in the future. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely, depending on many factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:
|
•
|
actual or anticipated differences in our operating results, liquidity, or financial condition;
|
|
•
|
changes in our revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA"), Adjusted EBITDA ("Adjusted EBITDA"), Funds From Operations ("FFO"), Adjusted FFO ("Adjusted FFO"), or earnings estimates;
|
|
•
|
publication of research reports about us, our hotels or the lodging or overall real estate industry;
|
|
•
|
failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;
|
|
•
|
the extent of institutional investor interest in us;
|
|
•
|
the reputation of REITs and real estate investments generally and the attractiveness of REIT equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, and fixed income securities;
|
|
•
|
additions and departures of key personnel;
|
|
•
|
the performance and market valuations of other similar companies;
|
|
•
|
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;
|
|
•
|
the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us or our industry;
|
|
•
|
the realization of any of the other risk factors presented in this Annual Report;
|
|
•
|
speculation in the press or investment community;
|
|
•
|
changes in accounting principles;
|
|
•
|
events beyond our control, such as terrorist acts, wars, travel-related health concerns and natural disasters; and
|
|
•
|
general market and economic conditions, including factors unrelated to our operating performance.
|
Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
30
Significant sales of our common stock, or the perception that significant sales of such shares could occur, may cause the price of our common stock to decline significantly.
A large volume of sales of shares of our common stock could decrease the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities in the future. Even if a substantial number of sales of our shares are not affected, the mere perception of the possibility of these sales could depress the market price of our common stock and have a negative effect on our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, anticipated downward pressure on our common stock price due to actual or anticipated sales of common stock from this market overhang could cause some institutions or individuals to engage in short sales of our common stock, which may itself cause the price of our common stock to decline.
Future sales or distributions of our common stock, including the sale by InvenTrust of its shares of our common stock, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
It is possible that some of our large stockholders will sell our common stock. In addition, following the distribution, InvenTrust retained ownership of approximately 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Subject to applicable securities laws, InvenTrust may choose to dispose of some or all of our shares at any time. Any disposition by InvenTrust, or any significant stockholder, of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such dispositions could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.
Our cash available for distribution to stockholders may not be sufficient to pay distributions at expected or required levels, and we may need external sources in order to make such distributions, or we may not be able to make such distributions at all, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly.
We intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common stock. We have established our distribution rate based upon our estimate of our annualized cash flow that will be available for distributions. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our historical and projected results of operations, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO, Adjusted FFO, liquidity and financial condition, REIT qualification, debt service requirements, capital expenditures and operating expenses, prohibitions and other restrictions under financing arrangements and applicable law and other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. No assurance can be given that our projections will prove accurate or that any level of distributions will be made or sustained or achieve a market yield. We may not be able to make distributions in the future or may need to consider various funding sources to cover any shortfall, including borrowing under our $400 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility, selling certain of our assets or using a portion of the net proceeds we receive from future offerings of equity, equity-related or debt securities or declaring taxable share dividends. Any of the foregoing could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly.
Future issuances of debt securities, which would rank senior to our common stock upon our liquidation, and future issuances of equity securities (including operating partnership units), which would dilute the holdings of our existing common stockholders and may be senior to our common stock for the purposes of making distributions, periodically or upon liquidation, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
In the future, we may issue debt or equity securities or incur other borrowings. Upon our liquidation, holders of our debt securities and other loans and preferred shares will receive a distribution of our available assets before common stockholders. If we incur debt in the future, our future interest costs could increase, and adversely affect our liquidity, FFO, Adjusted FFO and results of operations. We are not required to offer any additional equity securities to existing common stockholders on a preemptive basis. Therefore, additional common stock issuances, directly or through convertible or exchangeable securities (including operating partnership units), warrants or options, will dilute the holdings of our existing common stockholders and such issuances or the perception of such issuances may reduce the market price of our common stock. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities or incur other borrowings in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, nature or success of our future capital raising efforts. Thus, common stockholders bear the risk that our future issuances of debt or equity securities or our incurrence of other borrowings will negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
Your percentage ownership in us may be diluted in the future.
As with any publicly traded company, your percentage ownership in us may be diluted in the future because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or otherwise, including, without limitation, equity awards that may be granted to our directors, officers, employees and consultants. Our board of directors has approved an Incentive Award Plan (the "Plan"), which provides for the grant of cash and equity-based awards to our directors, officers, employees, and consultants. We reserved 7,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance or transfer pursuant to awards under the Plan. For a more detailed
31
description of the Plan, see "Part III—Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters."
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade our stock or our sector, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover us downgrade our stock or our industry, or the stock of any of our competitors, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our common stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose viability in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Increases in market interest rates may reduce demand for our common stock and result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.
The market price of our common stock may be influenced by the distribution yield on our common stock (i.e., the amount of our annual distributions as a percentage of the market price of our common stock) relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently low compared to historical levels, may lead prospective purchasers of our common stock to expect a higher distribution yield, which we may not be able, or may choose not, to provide. Higher interest rates would also likely increase our borrowing costs and decrease our operating results and cash available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited, which could limit our stockholders’ recourse in the event of actions not in our stockholders’ best interests.
Under Maryland law generally, a director is required to perform his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Under Maryland law, directors are presumed to have acted in accordance with this standard of conduct. In addition, our charter eliminates the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for monetary damages, except for liability resulting from:
|
•
|
actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or
|
|
•
|
active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action adjudicated.
|
Our charter authorizes us to obligate ourselves and our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to time, to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to any present or former director or officer who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service to us in that capacity. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist absent the current provisions in our charter and bylaws.
Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control.
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or "MGCL", may have the effect of deterring a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change in our control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our common stock, including:
|
•
|
"business combination" provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an "interested stockholder" (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting stock at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter impose fair price and/or super majority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and
|
|
•
|
"control share" provisions that provide that "control shares" of our company (defined as voting shares that, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a "control share acquisition" (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of issued and outstanding control shares) have no voting rights
|
32
except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.
As permitted by Maryland law, we have elected, by resolution of our board of directors, to opt out of the business combination provisions of the MGCL, provided that such business combination has been approved by our board of directors (including a majority of directors who are not affiliated with the interested stockholder), and, pursuant to a provision in our bylaws, to exempt any acquisition of our stock from the control share provisions of the MGCL. However, our board of directors may by resolution elect to repeal the exemption from the business combination provisions of the MGCL and may by amendment to our bylaws opt into the control share provisions of the MGCL at any time in the future.
Certain provisions of the MGCL permit our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to adopt certain mechanisms, some of which (for example, a classified board) we do not have. These provisions may have the effect of limiting or precluding a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in our control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price. Our charter contains a provision whereby we elect to be subject to the provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL relating to the filling of vacancies on our board of directors.
As a holding company with no direct operations, we rely on funds received from our Operating Partnership to pay liabilities.
As a holding company that conducts substantially all of our operations through our Operating Partnership, we rely on distributions from our Operating Partnership to pay any dividends we might declare on shares of our common stock. We also rely on distributions from our Operating Partnership to meet any of our obligations, including any tax liability on taxable income allocated to us from our Operating Partnership. In addition, because we are a holding company, your claims as stockholders will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations (whether or not for borrowed money) of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, our assets and those of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries will be able to satisfy the claims of our stockholders only after all of our and our Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.
We own
99.5%
of the operating partnership units and the remaining
0.5%
of the operating partnership units are owned by the other limited partners comprised of our executive officers and members of our board of directors. However, in connection with our future acquisition of properties or otherwise, we may issue operating partnership units to third parties. Such issuances would reduce our ownership in our operating partnership. Because you will not directly own units of our Operating Partnership, you will not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other partnership level activities of our Operating Partnership.
Our charter places limits on the amount of common stock that any person may own.
No more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our common stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year (other than the first taxable year for which an election to be a REIT has been made). Unless exempted by our board of directors, prospectively or retroactively, our charter prohibits any person or group from owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. These provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock.
If anyone transfers shares in a way that would violate the ownership limit, or prevent us from qualifying as a REIT under the U.S. federal income tax laws, those shares instead will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and will be either redeemed by us or sold to a person whose ownership of the shares will not violate the ownership limit. If this transfer to a trust fails to prevent such a violation or our continued qualification as a REIT, then the initial intended transfer shall be null and void from the outset. The intended transferee of those shares will be deemed never to have owned the shares. Anyone who acquires shares in violation of the ownership limit or the other restrictions on transfer in our charter bears the risk of suffering a financial loss when the shares are redeemed or sold if the market price of our shares falls between the date of purchase and the date of redemption or sale.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue preferred stock on terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or discourage a third party from acquiring us.
Our board of directors is permitted, subject to certain restrictions set forth in our charter, to authorize the issuance of up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. Further, our board
33
may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption of the stock and may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have authority to issue without stockholder approval. Thus, our board of directors could authorize us to issue shares of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our common stock or shares of preferred stock or common stock that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.
Our conflict of interest policy may not be successful in eliminating the influence of future conflicts of interest that may arise between us and our directors, officers and employees.
Our conflict of interest policy provides that any transaction, agreement or relationship in which any of our directors, officers or employees has a material direct or indirect pecuniary interest must be approved by a majority of our disinterested directors. Other than this policy, however, we may not adopt additional formal procedures for the review and approval of conflict of interest transactions generally. As such, our policies and procedures may not be successful in eliminating the influence of conflicts of interest.
Conflicts of interest could arise in the future between the interests of our stockholders and the interests of any holders of Operating Partnership Units in our Operating Partnership, which may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders.
Conflicts of interest could arise as a result of the relationships between us and our affiliates, on the one hand, and our Operating Partnership or any partner thereof, on the other. Our directors and officers who own interest in our Operating Partnership have duties to us under applicable Maryland law in connection with their management of our company. At the same time, XHR GP, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, as general partner of our Operating Partnership, has fiduciary duties and obligations to our Operating Partnership and its limited partners under Delaware law and the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership in connection with the management of our Operating Partnership. Our duties as general partner to our Operating Partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to our company. These conflicts may be resolved in a manner that is not in the best interests of our stockholders.
Certain provisions in the partnership agreement for our Operating Partnership may delay or prevent unsolicited acquisitions of us.
Provisions in the partnership agreement for our Operating Partnership may delay or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions of us or changes in our control. These provisions could discourage third parties from making proposals involving an unsolicited acquisition of us or a change in our control, although some stockholders might consider such proposals, if made, desirable.
Our board of directors may change our investment policies without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of your investment.
Our investment policies may change over time. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary, as new investment techniques are developed. Our investment policies, the methods for implementing them, and our other objectives, policies and procedures may be altered by a majority of the directors without the approval of our stockholders. As a result, the nature of your investment could change without your consent. A change in our investment strategy may, among other things, increase our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk and commercial real property market fluctuations, all of which could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives.
Our board of directors may approve very broad investment guidelines for us and may not always review or approve each investment decision made by our senior management team.
Our board of directors may authorize our senior management team to follow broad investment guidelines, in which case, we expect that our senior management team will have latitude in determining the assets that are proper investments for us, as well as the individual investment decisions. Our senior management team may make investments with lower rates of return than those anticipated under current market conditions and/or may make investments with greater risks to achieve those anticipated returns. We expect that our board of directors may not always approve each proposed investment by our senior management team.
34
None.
We lease our headquarters located at 200 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 1200 Orlando, Florida 32801.
Hotel Properties
As of
December 31, 2015
, we owned a portfolio of
50
operating hotels,
48
of which are wholly owned, comprising
12,548
rooms, including a 75% ownership interest in two hotels owned through two consolidated joint ventures, across
21
states and the District of Columbia.
Geographic Diversification
We believe our portfolio of hotels is geographically diverse. Our management team has implemented and executed a strategy of acquiring hotels primarily in the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations in the U.S. The following table shows the geographic diversification as of
December 31, 2015
:
|
Number of
|
Number of
|
|||||
|
Region
|
Hotels
|
Rooms
|
||||
|
South Atlantic
|
||||||
|
(Georgia, Florida, Maryland, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington D.C.)
|
16
|
|
3,319
|
|
||
|
West South Central
|
||||||
|
(Louisiana and Texas)
|
9
|
|
3,339
|
|
||
|
Pacific
|
||||||
|
(California, Oregon, and Hawaii)
|
8
|
|
2,591
|
|
||
|
Mountain
|
||||||
|
(Arizona, Colorado, and Utah)
|
5
|
|
1,016
|
|
||
|
Other
|
||||||
|
(Alabama, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Missouri, and Pennsylvania)
|
12
|
|
2,283
|
|
||
|
Total
|
50
|
|
12,548
|
|
||
35
Our Brand Affiliations
Our portfolio of hotels operate under premium brands, with approximately
81%
of our rooms operating under Marriott, Hilton, Kimpton or Hyatt brands. The following table sets forth our brand affiliations as of
December 31, 2015
:
|
Brand Affiliation
|
Number of Hotels
|
Number of Rooms
|
Percentage of Total Rooms
|
||||
|
Marriott
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Autograph Collection
|
5
|
587
|
4.7
|
%
|
|||
|
Courtyard by Marriott
|
4
|
630
|
5.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Marriott
|
9
|
3,102
|
24.7
|
%
|
|||
|
Renaissance
|
2
|
1,014
|
8.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Residence Inn
|
3
|
637
|
5.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Subtotal
|
23
|
5,970
|
47.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Hilton
|
|||||||
|
DoubleTree
|
1
|
220
|
1.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Embassy Suites
|
1
|
223
|
1.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Hampton Inn
|
2
|
264
|
2.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Hilton
|
3
|
669
|
5.3
|
%
|
|||
|
Hilton Garden Inn
|
2
|
478
|
3.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Homewood Suites
|
1
|
162
|
1.3
|
%
|
|||
|
Subtotal
|
10
|
2,016
|
16.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Kimpton
|
|
|
|||||
|
Canary
|
1
|
97
|
0.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Lorien
|
1
|
107
|
0.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Monaco
|
3
|
605
|
4.8
|
%
|
|||
|
Palomar
|
1
|
230
|
1.8
|
%
|
|||
|
RiverPlace Hotel
|
1
|
84
|
0.7
|
%
|
|||
|
Subtotal
|
7
|
1,123
|
9.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Hyatt
|
|
|
|||||
|
Andaz
|
3
|
451
|
3.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Hyatt
|
1
|
118
|
0.9
|
%
|
|||
|
Hyatt Regency
|
1
|
502
|
4.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Subtotal
|
5
|
1,071
|
8.5
|
%
|
|||
|
Starwood
|
|||||||
|
Westin
|
2
|
893
|
7.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Subtotal
|
2
|
893
|
7.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Aston
|
1
|
645
|
5.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Fairmont
|
1
|
545
|
4.3
|
%
|
|||
|
Loews
|
1
|
285
|
2.3
|
%
|
|||
|
Total
|
50
|
12,548
|
100
|
%
|
|||
36
Our Hotels
The following table provides a list of our portfolio as of
December 31, 2015
(1)
:
|
Hotel
|
Rooms
|
Year Acquired
|
State
|
Region
(2)
|
Brand Parent Company
|
Hotel Management Company
(3)
|
Chain Scale Segment
(4)
|
|||||||
|
Operating Hotels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Marriott San Francisco Airport Waterfront
|
688
|
2012
|
CA
|
P
|
Marriott
|
Marriott
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel
(5)
|
645
|
2014
|
HI
|
P
|
Aston
|
Aston
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Fairmont Dallas
(6)
|
545
|
2011
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Fairmont
|
Fairmont
|
L
|
|||||||
|
Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center
(6)
|
522
|
2012
|
GA
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Renaissance
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara
(5)(6)
|
502
|
2013
|
CA
|
P
|
Hyatt
|
Hyatt
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Renaissance Austin Hotel
(6)
|
492
|
2012
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Marriott
|
Renaissance
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Westin Galleria Houston
(6)
|
487
|
2013
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Starwood
|
Westin
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Marriott Dallas City Center
(6)
|
416
|
2010
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Marriott
|
Marriott
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa
(6)
|
409
|
2012
|
KY
|
ESC
|
Marriott
|
Marriott
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Westin Oaks Houston at the Galleria
(6)
|
406
|
2013
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Starwood
|
Westin
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Marriott Charleston Town Center
(5)(6)
|
352
|
2011
|
WV
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Marriott
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center
(5)
|
343
|
2007
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Marriott
|
Marriott
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown
|
300
|
2008
|
DC
|
SA
|
Hilton
|
Urgo
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Marriott Atlanta Century Center / Emory Area
(5)
|
287
|
2008
|
GA
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Marriott
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Loews New Orleans Hotel
(6)
|
285
|
2013
|
LA
|
WSC
|
Loews
|
Loews
|
L
|
|||||||
|
Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa
|
275
|
2011
|
CA
|
P
|
Marriott
|
Sage
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville
(5)(6)(7)
|
248
|
2007
|
FL
|
SA
|
Hilton
|
Davidson
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando, an Autograph Collection Hotel
(6)
|
247
|
2012
|
FL
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Kessler
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hotel Palomar Philadelphia
|
230
|
2015
|
PA
|
MA
|
Kimpton
|
Kimpton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Residence Inn Denver City Center
(6)
|
228
|
2013
|
CO
|
M
|
Marriott
|
Sage
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Hilton Suites Phoenix
|
226
|
2008
|
AZ
|
M
|
Hilton
|
Hilton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hotel Monaco Salt Lake City
|
225
|
2013
|
UT
|
M
|
Kimpton
|
Kimpton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Embassy Suites Baltimore North / Hunt Valley
|
223
|
2008
|
MD
|
SA
|
Hilton
|
Embassy Suites
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Residence Inn Boston Cambridge
(6)
|
221
|
2008
|
MA
|
NE
|
Marriott
|
Residence Inn
|
U
|
|||||||
|
DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Washington DC
|
220
|
2008
|
DC
|
SA
|
Hilton
|
Davidson
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Marriott West Des Moines
|
219
|
2010
|
IA
|
WNC
|
Marriott
|
Concord
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Courtyard Fort Worth Downtown / Blackstone
|
203
|
2008
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Marriott
|
Courtyard
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Hilton St. Louis Downtown at the Arch
|
195
|
2012
|
MO
|
WNC
|
Hilton
|
Hilton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hotel Monaco Chicago
(6)
|
191
|
2013
|
IL
|
ENC
|
Kimpton
|
Kimpton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hotel Monaco Denver
(6)
|
189
|
2013
|
CO
|
M
|
Kimpton
|
Kimpton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Residence Inn Baltimore Inner Harbor
|
188
|
2008
|
MD
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Urgo
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown
(6)
|
182
|
2010
|
PA
|
MA
|
Marriott
|
Sage
(8)
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Chicago North Shore / Evanston
|
178
|
2007
|
IL
|
ENC
|
Hilton
|
Sage
(8)
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Homewood Suites by Hilton Houston Near the Galleria
|
162
|
2008
|
TX
|
WSC
|
Hilton
|
Sage
(8)
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Andaz San Diego
|
159
|
2013
|
CA
|
P
|
Hyatt
|
Hyatt
|
L
|
|||||||
|
Andaz Savannah
(6)
|
151
|
2013
|
GA
|
SA
|
Hyatt
|
Hyatt
|
L
|
|||||||
|
Hampton Inn & Suites Denver Downtown
|
148
|
2008
|
CO
|
M
|
Hilton
|
Hampton Inn
|
UM
|
|||||||
|
Andaz Napa
(6)
|
141
|
2013
|
CA
|
P
|
Hyatt
|
Hyatt
|
L
|
|||||||
|
Courtyard Kansas City Country Club Plaza
|
123
|
2007
|
MO
|
WNC
|
Marriott
|
Sage
(8)
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB
(6)
|
122
|
2008
|
AL
|
ESC
|
Marriott
|
Courtyard
|
U
|
|||||||
|
Hyatt Key West Resort & Spa
|
118
|
2013
|
FL
|
SA
|
Hyatt
|
Hyatt
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Hampton Inn & Suites Baltimore Inner Harbor
|
116
|
2007
|
MD
|
SA
|
Hilton
|
Urgo
|
UM
|
|||||||
|
Bohemian Hotel Celebration, an Autograph Collection Hotel
|
115
|
2013
|
FL
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Kessler
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Marriott Chicago at Medical District / UIC
|
113
|
2008
|
IL
|
ENC
|
Marriott
|
Davidson
|
UU
|
|||||||
37
|
Lorien Hotel & Spa
|
107
|
2013
|
VA
|
SA
|
Kimpton
|
Kimpton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, an Autograph Collection Hotel
(9)
|
100
|
N/A
|
AL
|
ESC
|
Marriott
|
Kessler
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Canary Santa Barbara
|
97
|
2015
|
CA
|
P
|
Kimpton
|
Kimpton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
RiverPlace Hotel
|
84
|
2015
|
OR
|
P
|
Kimpton
|
Kimpton
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Bohemian Hotel Savannah Riverfront, an Autograph Collection Hotel
(6)
|
75
|
2012
|
GA
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Kessler
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston, an Autograph Collection Hotel
(10)
|
50
|
N/A
|
SC
|
SA
|
Marriott
|
Kessler
|
UU
|
|||||||
|
(1)
|
Includes only the hotels in our portfolio as of
December 31, 2015
. See "Basis of Presentation."
|
|
(2)
|
"ENC" refers to East North Central; "ESC" refers to East South Central; "M" refers to Mountain; "MA" refers to Middle Atlantic; "NE" refers to New England; "P" refers to Pacific; "SA" refers to South Atlantic; "WNC" refers to West North Central; "WSC" refers to West South Central.
|
|
(3)
|
"Aston" refers to an affiliate of Aqua-Aston Hospitality; "Courtyard" refers to Courtyard Management Corporation; "Concord" refers to Concord Hospitality Enterprises Company; "Davidson" refers to Davidson Hotel Company LLC; "Embassy Suites" refers to Embassy Suites Management LLC; "Fairmont" refers to Fairmont Hotels & Resorts (U.S.) Inc.; "Hampton Inn" refers to Hampton Inns Management LLC ; "Hilton" refers to Hilton Management LLC; "Hyatt" refers to Hyatt Corporation; "Kessler" refers to Kessler Collection Management, LLC; "Kimpton" refers to Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC; "Loews" refers to Loews New Orleans Hotel Corp.; "Marriott" refers to Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.; "Renaissance" refers to Renaissance Hotel Operating Company; "Residence Inn" refers to Residence Inn by Marriott, Inc.; "Sage" refers to affiliates of Sage Hospitality Resources, LLC, "Urgo" refers to Urgo Hotels LP; and "Westin" refers to Westin Operator, LLC.
|
|
(4)
|
"L" refers to Luxury; "UU" refers to Upper Upscale; "U" refers to Upscale; "UM" refers to Upper Midscale.
|
|
(5)
|
This hotel is subject to a ground lease that covers all or part of the land underlying the hotel. See "Our Principal Agreements- Ground Leases" for more information.
|
|
(6)
|
This property is subject to mortgage debt at
December 31, 2015
.
|
|
(7)
|
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center was sold in February 2016.
|
|
(8)
|
Effective October 1, 2015, the Company terminated its former management agreements for these hotel properties and subsequently executed individual management agreements for these hotel properties with Sage.
|
|
(9)
|
We own a 75% interest in the Grand Bohemian Mountain Brook, which opened in the fourth quarter of 2015. Our partner for this hotel is Lane Park at Mountain Brook, LLC. The outstanding principal on the construction loan was
$25.8 million
as of
December 31, 2015
. Borrowings on the interest-only construction loan bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% and the loan matures in 2020 with no extension option. We chose to develop this hotel in order to add an asset to our portfolio that is well positioned to experience strong growth and capture market share in a high barrier-to-entry location with a limited supply of upper upscale properties. This opportunity was only available to us as a joint venture.
|
|
(10)
|
We own a 75% interest in the Grand Bohemian Charleston, which opened in the third quarter of 2015. Our partner for this hotel is Kessler Meeting Street, LLC. The outstanding principal on the construction loan is
$20.0 million
as of
December 31, 2015
. Borrowings on the interest-only construction loan bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% and the loan matures in 2020 with no extension option. We chose to develop this hotel in order to add an asset to our portfolio that is well positioned to experience strong growth and capture market share in a high barrier-to-entry location with a limited supply of upper upscale properties. This opportunity was only available to us as a joint venture.
|
38
Our Principal Agreements
Hotel Management and Franchise Agreements
In order to qualify as a REIT, we cannot directly or indirectly operate any of our hotels. We lease each of our
50
hotels to TRS lessees, which in turn engage property managers to manage our hotels. Each of our hotels is operated pursuant to a hotel management agreement with an independent hotel management company. Approximately 36% of our hotels, which we refer to as "franchised hotels" are also operated under distinct franchise agreements, a few of which are with an affiliate of the hotel’s management company. Approximately 64% of our hotels receive the benefit pursuant to the hotel’s management agreement, which we refer to as "brand-managed hotels."
Below is a general overview of the management and franchise agreements for our hotels, summarizing the principal terms found in each type of agreement.
Management Agreements for Brand-Managed Hotels
Pursuant to our management agreements for brand-managed hotels, the management company controls the day-to-day operations of each hotel, and we are granted limited approval rights with respect to certain of the management company’s actions, including entering into long-term or high value contracts, engaging in certain actions relating to legal proceedings, approving the operating budget, making certain capital expenditures and the hiring of certain management personnel.
We are provided with a variety of services and benefits, including the right to use the name, marks and system of operation of a brand affiliated with the management company, as well as centralized reservation systems, national advertising, marketing programs and publicity designed to increase brand awareness, training of personnel and payroll and accounting services.
Of our brand-managed hotels, approximately 43% of our hotels by room count are managed by Marriott, approximately 12% are managed by Kimpton, approximately 11% are managed by Hyatt, and the rest are managed by management companies affiliated with a variety of other brands.
Term
The majority of our management agreements for brand-managed hotels contain an initial term between 20 to 30 years, and have an average remaining initial term of approximately 12 years, assuming no renewal options are exercised by the management company. These agreements generally allow for one or more renewal periods at the option of the management company. Including the exercise of all renewal options the average remaining term of our management agreements is approximately 23
years.
Fees
Our management agreements for brand-managed hotels typically contain a two-tiered fee structure, wherein the management company receives a base management fee and, if certain financial thresholds are met or exceeded, an incentive management fee. The base management fee is typically 3.0% of gross hotel revenues or receipts, but ranges from 2.0% to 7.0%, the highest of which also include fees for additional non-management services. The incentive management fees range from 10% to 30% of net operating income (or other similar metric, as defined in the management agreement) remaining after deducting a priority return typically equal to 10% to 11% of our total capital investment in the hotel. We also pay certain accounting services fees to the management companies in a majority of the agreements. Many management agreements also require the maintenance of a capital reserve fund ranging between 4% and 5% of hotel revenues to be used for capital expenditures to maintain the quality of the hotels.
Termination Events
Performance Termination
Most of our management agreements for our brand-managed hotels align our interests with those of the management company by providing us with a right to terminate the agreement if the management company fails to achieve certain criteria relating to the performance of the hotel. We generally may initiate a performance termination if, during any two consecutive year period, (i) the hotel fails to achieve a specified amount of operating profit, and (ii) certain operating metrics of the hotel, as compared to a competitive set of hotels in the relevant local market as agreed between the parties, fail to exceed a specified threshold as set forth in the applicable management agreement. In substantially all of the management agreements for brand-managed hotels, the management company has a right to avoid a performance termination by paying an amount equal to the amount by which the operating profit for the two year period was less than the performance termination threshold, as set forth in the applicable management agreement.
39
Early Termination and Liquidated Damages
Subject to certain qualifications, notice requirements and applicable cure periods, the management agreements for our brand-managed hotels are generally terminable by either party upon a material casualty or condemnation of the hotel or the occurrence of certain customary events of default, including, among others: the bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; the failure of either party to make a payment when due, and failure to cure such non-payment after due notice; or breach by either party of covenants or obligations under the management agreement.
Additionally, the management company typically has the right to terminate the management agreement in certain situations, including the occurrence of certain actions with respect to the mortgage or our interference with the management company’s ability to operate the hotel by failing to approve required capital improvements or expenditures or by failing to complete or commence required repairs after damage or destruction to the hotel. Most of our agreements do not require payment of liquidated damages in the event of an early termination; however, our Marriott brand-managed hotels require us to establish a reserve fund out of gross revenues to be used in the event of a termination. The fund is to be used to reimburse the management company for all costs and expenses incurred by the management company that relate to (i) the operation of the hotel prior to termination but that accrue after termination, (ii) the management company terminating its employees and/or (iii) the payment of any pending or contingent claims, depending on the agreement.
Sale of a Hotel
Our management agreements for our brand-managed hotels generally provide that we cannot sell a hotel to a person who: (i) does not have sufficient financial resources, (ii) is of bad moral character, (iii) is a competitor, or (iv) is a specially designated national or blocked person, as set forth in the applicable management agreement. Under most agreements, we will default if we proceed with a sale without the management company’s consent and the assignment of the hotel’s management agreement. Some of the agreements provide that our sale or transfer of the hotel to an affiliate does not require us to obtain the consent of the management company.
Management Agreements for Franchised Hotels
Our franchised hotels are managed by various third party management companies, which are either independent or are affiliated with a hotel’s brand. As in our management agreements for brand-managed hotels, the management company controls the day-to-day operations of each hotel, and we are granted limited approval rights with respect to certain of the management company’s actions, including entering into long-term or high value contracts, engaging in certain actions relating to legal proceedings, approving the operating budget, making certain capital expenditures and the hiring of certain management personnel.
Term
Our management agreements for franchised hotels generally contain initial terms between seven and 15 years with an average remaining initial term of approximately five years. Almost all of these agreements either do not contemplate a renewal or extension of the initial term or cannot be extended without our consent, and the rest may be extended at the option of the management company if certain conditions are met. Assuming all renewal or extension options are excised, the average remaining term is approximately seven years.
Fees
Generally, the management agreements for franchised hotels contain a two-tiered fee structure in which the management company receives a base management fee and, if certain financial thresholds are met or exceeded, an incentive management fee, each calculated on a per hotel basis. The base management fees range from 1.5% to 4.0% of gross hotel revenue, with some base fees increasing over time. Almost all of the incentive management fees range from 10% to 30% of net operating income (or other similar metric, as defined in the management agreement) remaining after deducting a priority return typically equal to 10% to 11% of our total capital investment in the hotel. We also pay certain accounting services fees to the management companies under a majority of the agreements.
Termination Events
Performance Termination
As with our management agreements for brand-managed hotels, most of the management agreements for franchised hotels provide us with a right to terminate the agreement if the management company fails to achieve certain criteria relating to the performance of the hotel. Generally, we may initiate a performance termination if, during any two consecutive year period, (i) the hotel fails to achieve a specified amount of operating profit, and (ii) certain operating metrics of the hotel, as compared to a
40
competitive set of hotels in the relevant local market as agreed between the parties, fail to exceed a specified threshold as set forth in the applicable management agreement. In some of the management agreements for franchised hotels, the management company has a right, which can usually be exercised no more than once per hotel, to avoid a performance termination by paying an amount specified in the applicable management agreement.
Early Termination and Liquidated Damages
Subject to certain qualifications, notice requirements and applicable cure periods, the management agreements for franchised hotels are generally terminable by either party upon a material casualty or condemnation of the hotel or the occurrence of certain customary events of default, including, among others: the bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; a breach by either party of covenants or obligations under the management agreement, including a failure by us to provide required operating funds or our failure to make a payment when due and failure to cure such non-payment after due notice; a default by either party under the corresponding franchise agreement; a failure of either party to maintain a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages; and a failure by either party to maintain insurance policies required under the management agreement.
In the event that a management company elects to terminate a management agreement due to certain events of default by us, the management company generally may recover a termination fee, as liquidated damages, as set forth in the applicable management agreement. Several of the management agreements for franchised hotels grant us a right to terminate without cause upon notice to the management company. In some instances, such termination requires the payment of a termination fee.
Sale of a Hotel
Under a majority of the management agreements for franchised hotels, in order to sell a hotel, we must terminate the management agreement and pay a fee to the management company. However, in some cases, we may avoid such fees if the new owner is either assigned the agreement or enters into a new agreement with the management company.
Franchise Agreements
Our franchised hotels operate under franchise agreements with Hilton and Marriott. Pursuant to our franchise agreements, we are granted rights to use the franchisor’s name, marks and system in the operation of our hotels. Franchisors also provide us with a variety of services and benefits, including centralized reservation systems, national advertising, marketing programs and publicity designed to increase brand awareness, training of personnel and maintenance of operational quality at hotels across the brand system. In return, our TRS lessees, as the franchisees, are required to operate franchised hotels consistent with the applicable brand standards. The franchise agreements generally specify management, operational, record-keeping, accounting, reporting and marketing standards and procedures with which our TRS lessees must comply, and ensure consistency across the brand by outlining standards for guest services, products, signage and furniture, fixtures and equipment, among other things. To ensure our compliance, most of the franchise agreements specify that we must make the hotel available for quality inspections by the franchisor. We are also required to participate in the applicable rewards program for each brand.
Term
A majority of our franchise agreements contain an initial term of 15 to 20 years, with an average remaining initial term of approximately 11 years. Almost all of our franchise agreements do not contemplate any renewals or extensions of the initial term.
Fees
Substantially all of our franchise agreements require that we pay a royalty fee ranging between 4% and 6% of the gross room revenue of the applicable hotel and, for certain full service hotels, an additional fee ranging between 2% and 3% on gross food and beverage revenue. We must also pay marketing, reservation or other program fees ranging between 1% and 4.3% of the gross room revenue. In addition, under substantially all of our franchise agreements, the franchisor has the right to require that we renovate guest rooms and public facilities from time to time to comply with then-current brand standards. Under certain agreements, such expenditures are mandated at set periods, with at least some level of expenditure required every five to six years. Many franchise agreements also require the maintenance of a capital reserve fund ranging between 1% and 5% of hotel revenues to be used for capital expenditures to maintain the quality of the hotels.
Termination Events
Our franchise agreements provide for termination at the applicable franchisor’s option upon the occurrence of certain events, including, among others: the failure to maintain brand standards, the failure to pay royalties and fees or to perform other obligations under the franchise license; bankruptcy; and abandonment of the franchise or a change of control, and in the event of such termination, we are required to pay liquidated damages.
41
Guarantee and Franchisor Rights
The TRS lessee that is the franchisee is responsible for making all payments to the franchisor under the applicable franchise agreement; however, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and/or the corresponding property-owning subsidiary generally guarantee the TRS lessee’s obligations under the franchise agreements. In addition, some of the franchise agreements require that we provide the franchisor with a right of first offer or right of first refusal in the event of certain sales or transfers of a hotel, and almost all of our agreements provide the franchisor the right to approve any change in the hotel’s management company.
TRS Leases
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, neither our company nor any of our subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership, may directly or indirectly operate our hotels. Subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership, as lessors, lease our hotels to our TRS lessees, which, in turn, are parties to the existing hotel management agreements with third-party hotel management companies for each of our hotels.
42
Ground Leases
The following table summarizes the remaining primary term, renewal rights, purchase rights and monthly base rent as of
December 31, 2015
associated with land underlying our hotels and meeting facilities that we lease from third parties (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
Property
|
Current Lease Term Expiration
|
Renewal Rights / Purchase Rights
|
Current Monthly Minimum or Base Rent
(1)
|
Base Rent Increases at Renewal
|
Lease Type
|
|||||
|
Ground lease: Entire Property
|
||||||||||
|
Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel
|
December 31, 2057
|
No renewal rights
(2)
|
$191
(3)
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara
|
April 30, 2035
|
4 x 10 years,
1 x 9 years (4) |
$60
|
No increase unless lessee exercises its option to expand at which time base rent will be increased by $800 for each additional hotel room in excess of 500
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Marriott Charleston Town Center
|
December 11, 2032
|
4 x 10 years
|
$4
|
No increase unless hotel is expanded beyond 356 guest rooms, at which time rent shall increase on a pro rata basis
(5)
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville
|
March 31, 2073
|
None
|
$3
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Marriott Atlanta Century Center / Emory Area
|
December 31, 2058
|
None
|
$3
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Ground lease: Partial Property
|
||||||||||
|
Convention Center at Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center
|
June 30, 2100
|
No renewal rights
(6)
|
$10
(7)
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
In addition to minimum rent, the Company may owe variable incentive rent.
|
|
(2)
|
The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase the property, which must be exercised within 30 days of receiving the third party’s terms from Landlord.
|
|
(3)
|
For and during the period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2029, the Minimum Rent for each year is adjusted based on a calculation tied to the Consumer Price Index. From January 1, 2030 through the remainder of the lease terminating on December 31, 2057, the minimum rent will be redetermined each ten year period. The monthly minimum or base rent in this chart is for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
|
|
(4)
|
The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase all or a portion of certain areas covered by the two separate leases.
|
|
(5)
|
If the hotel is increased from 356 to 500 rooms, the new annual base rent will increase to $72 thousand.
|
|
(6)
|
The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase the property, which must be exercised within 60 days of receiving the third party’s terms from the landlord.
|
|
(7)
|
The base rent for each year is adjusted based on a calculation tied to the Consumer Price Index. The monthly minimum or base rent in this chart is for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
|
43
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including proceedings involving tort and other general liability claims, workers’ compensation and other employee claims and claims related to our ownership of certain hotel properties. Most occurrences involving liability, claims of negligence and employees are covered by insurance with solvent insurance carriers. We recognize a liability when we believe the loss is probable and reasonably estimable. We currently believe that the ultimate outcome of such lawsuits and proceedings will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material effect on our combined consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Not applicable.
44
Market Information
Our common stock began trading on the NYSE under the symbol "XHR" on February 4, 2015. The following tables sets forth, for the period indicated, the high and low closing prices per share and the cash dividends declared:
|
2015
|
||||||
|
High
|
Low
|
Dividend
|
||||
|
First Quarter
(1)
|
$24.24
|
$20.12
|
$0.15
|
|||
|
Second Quarter
|
$24.39
|
$21.29
|
$0.23
|
|||
|
Third Quarter
|
$22.71
|
$17.11
|
$0.23
|
|||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$19.09
|
$15.15
|
$0.23
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Only includes the period from February 4, 2015, the date our listing on the NYSE, to March 31, 2015.
|
The closing price per share of our common shares on
December 31, 2015
, as reported by the NYSE, was $15.33. On
March 1, 2016
, the closing stock price of our common stock was $15.84.
Shareholder Information
As of
March 1, 2016
, there were 18,781 holders of record of our outstanding common stock. This stockholder figure does not include a substantially greater number of "street name" holders, or beneficial holders, of our common stock whose shares are held by bank, brokers and other financial institutions.
Also at
March 1, 2016
there were twelve holders (other than our company) of our operating partnership units comprising certain of our executive officers and members of our board of directors. A majority of the operating partnership units are currently unvested. Subject to certain restrictions, our operating partnership units are redeemable for cash or, at our election, for our common shares.
In order to comply with certain requirements related to our qualification as a REIT, our charter, subject to certain exceptions, contains restrictions on the number of shares of our stock that a person may own. Our charter provides that no person may beneficially or constructively own more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock.
Dividends
We anticipate making regular quarterly distributions to stockholders. To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders an amount at least equal to:
|
i.
|
90% of our REIT taxable income, determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP")); plus
|
|
ii.
|
90% of the excess of our net income from foreclosure property over the tax imposed on such income by the Code; less
|
|
iii.
|
any excess non-cash income (as determined under the Code).
|
Distributions made by us will be authorized and determined by our board of directors, in its sole discretion, out of legally available funds, and will be dependent upon a number of factors, including our actual and projected results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity, our qualification as a REIT and other tax considerations, capital expenditures, and other obligations, debt covenants, contractual prohibitions or other limitations under applicable law and other such matters our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure you that our distribution policy will remain the same in the future, or that any estimated distributions will be made or sustained.
Our ability to make distributions to our stockholders will depend upon the performance of our asset portfolio. Distributions will be made in cash to the extent cash is available for distribution. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to pay distributions to our stockholders. To the extent that our cash available for distribution is less than the amount required to be distributed under the REIT provisions of the Code, we may consider various funding sources to cover any shortfall, including borrowing under our $400 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility, selling certain of our assets or using a portion of
45
the net proceeds we receive from future offerings of equity, equity-related or debt securities or declaring taxable share dividends.
In addition, our charter allows us to issue preferred stock that could have a preference over our common stock as to distributions. In addition, our board of directors could change our distribution policy in the future.
The following table sets forth information regarding the declaration, payment and income tax characterization of distributions paid per share for the year ended
December 31, 2015
:
Common Stock
The Company paid the following dividends on common stock during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
(1)
:
|
Dividend per Share/Unit
(2)
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
Record Date
|
Payable Date
|
||||
|
$0.15
|
(3)
|
March 31, 2015
|
March 31, 2015
|
April 15, 2015
|
|||
|
$0.23
|
June 30, 2015
|
June 30, 2015
|
July 15, 2015
|
||||
|
$0.23
|
September 30, 2015
|
September 30, 2015
|
October 15, 2015
|
||||
|
$0.23
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2015
|
January 15, 2016
|
||||
|
(1)
|
For income tax purposes, dividends paid per share on our common and preferred stock in 2015 were 100% ordinary income.
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts are rounded to the nearest whole cent for presentation purposes
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the Company's anticipated regular quarterly dividend of
$0.23
per share, prorated for the period from February 3, 2015 through March 31, 2015.
|
Preferred Stock
The Company paid the following dividends on its
12.5%
Series A preferred stock during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
(1)
:
|
Dividend per Share
|
For the Period
|
Record Date
|
Payable Date
|
||||
|
$61.11
|
(2)
|
June 30, 2015
|
June 15, 2015
|
June 30, 2015
|
|||
|
$31.25
|
(3)
|
September 30, 2015
|
September 30, 2015
|
September 30, 2015
|
|||
|
(1)
|
For income tax purposes, dividends paid per share on our common and preferred stock were 100% ordinary income.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the Company's anticipated regular semi-annual dividend of
$62.50
per share, prorated for the period from January 5, 2015 through June 30, 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the Company's anticipated regular semi-annual dividend of
$62.50
per share prorated for the period from July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015. This dividend was paid in connection with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock on September 30, 2015, and constitutes accrued but unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock as of the redemption date.
|
46
Share Performance Graph
The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or the be "filed" with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporate by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.
The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common shares from February 4, 2015, to the NYSE closing price per share on
December 31, 2015
, with the cumulative total return on the
Dow Jones U.S. Hotel and Lodging REIT Index ("DJUSHL REIT Index"), the
Russell 2000 Index (the "Russell 2000 Index") and the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity REITs Index (the "FTSE NAREIT Equity Index") for the same period. Total return values were calculated assuming a $100 investment on February 4, 2015 with reinvestment of all dividends in (i) our common shares, (i) the
DJUSHL REIT Index,
(iii) the Russell 2000 Index and (iv) the FTSE NAREIT Equity Index. The total return values do not include any dividends declared, but not paid, during the period.
`
The actual returns shown on the graph above are as follows:
|
Name
|
Value of Investment at February 4, 2015
|
Value of Investment at December 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
77.55
|
|
||
|
DJUSHL REIT Index
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
72.24
|
|
||
|
Russell 2000 Index
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
95.34
|
|
||
|
FTSE NAREIT Equity Index
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
96.85
|
|
||
Sale of Unregistered Securities
On January 5, 2015, Xenia issued 125 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock in a private placement to approximately 125 investors who qualified as "accredited investors" (as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act) for an aggregate purchase price of $125,000 in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D, relative to transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, to the extent an exemption from such registration was required.
On September 30, 2015, the Company redeemed all 125 outstanding shares of its Series A Preferred Stock for $1,100 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $31.25 per share, including a $100.00 per share redemption premium, for an aggregate per share redemption price of $1,131.25. Following the redemption, in accordance with the Company’s charter, the Board of Directors of the Company reclassified the redeemed shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock as authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock without designation as to series. In connection therewith, on November 10, 2015, the Company filed Articles Supplementary and Articles of Restatement (the "Revised Articles") to the Company’s charter with the
47
State Department of Assessments & Taxation of Maryland. The only change made to the existing charter of the Company in the Revised Articles was to reflect the reclassification of the Series A Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock without designation as described above.
Also on September 30, 2015, and in connection with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock described above, the Operating Partnership redeemed all 125 of its Series A Preferred Units that were held by the Company for $1,100 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $31.25 per share, including a $100.00 per share redemption premium, for an aggregate per unit redemption price of $1,131.25. In connection therewith, on November 10, 2015, the Company entered into the Fourth Amended & Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of XHR LP (the "Fourth LP Agreement"). The Fourth LP Agreement amended the previous agreement to reflect the redemption of the Series A Preferred Units and restate the Agreement to include the terms of a prior amendment within the Fourth LP Agreement.
Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under "Part III-Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters," of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and such information is incorporated by reference herein.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program (the "Repurchase Program") pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program.
From January 1, 2016 through
March 1, 2016
, the Company repurchased
2,813,292
shares of common stock at a weighted average price of
$14.27
per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$40.2 million
. As of
March 1, 2016
, the Company had approximately
$59.8 million
remaining under its share repurchase authorization.
48
You should read the following summary historical consolidated financial and operating data together with "Part II-Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Part I-Item 1. Business," "Part I-Item 2. Properties," and the combined consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
49
The following table shows our combined consolidated selected financial data relating to our combined consolidated historical financial condition and results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
,
2013
, and
2012
(in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Room revenues
|
$
|
663,224
|
|
$
|
631,901
|
|
$
|
443,267
|
|
$
|
323,959
|
|
|||
|
Food and beverage revenues
|
259,036
|
|
235,066
|
|
168,368
|
|
116,260
|
|
|||||||
|
Other revenues
|
53,884
|
|
59,699
|
|
40,236
|
|
26,661
|
|
|||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
976,144
|
|
$
|
926,666
|
|
$
|
651,871
|
|
$
|
466,880
|
|
|||
|
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Room expenses
|
148,492
|
|
140,128
|
|
96,444
|
|
70,165
|
|
|||||||
|
Food and beverage expenses
|
167,840
|
|
158,243
|
|
114,011
|
|
78,080
|
|
|||||||
|
Other direct expenses
|
17,984
|
|
28,556
|
|
21,110
|
|
17,401
|
|
|||||||
|
Other indirect expenses
|
226,108
|
|
214,272
|
|
157,385
|
|
115,229
|
|
|||||||
|
Management fees
|
49,818
|
|
52,104
|
|
37,683
|
|
26,827
|
|
|||||||
|
Total hotel operating expenses
|
$
|
610,242
|
|
$
|
593,303
|
|
$
|
426,633
|
|
$
|
307,702
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
148,009
|
|
141,807
|
|
104,229
|
|
89,629
|
|
|||||||
|
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance
|
49,717
|
|
44,625
|
|
29,763
|
|
22,382
|
|
|||||||
|
Ground lease expense
|
5,204
|
|
5,541
|
|
1,923
|
|
2,126
|
|
|||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
25,556
|
|
38,895
|
|
13,445
|
|
9,008
|
|
|||||||
|
Business management fees
|
—
|
|
1,474
|
|
12,743
|
|
10,812
|
|
|||||||
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
5,046
|
|
1,192
|
|
2,275
|
|
751
|
|
|||||||
|
Pre-opening expenses
|
1,411
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Provision for asset impairments
|
—
|
|
5,378
|
|
49,145
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Separation and other start-up related expenses
|
26,887
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Total expenses
|
$
|
872,072
|
|
$
|
832,215
|
|
$
|
640,156
|
|
$
|
442,410
|
|
|||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
104,072
|
|
$
|
94,451
|
|
$
|
11,715
|
|
$
|
24,470
|
|
|||
|
Gain (loss) on sale of investment properties
|
43,015
|
|
693
|
|
—
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Other income (loss)
|
4,916
|
|
324
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
798
|
|
|||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(50,816
|
)
|
(57,427
|
)
|
(52,792
|
)
|
(45,061
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
(5,761
|
)
|
(1,713
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
|
—
|
|
4,216
|
|
(33
|
)
|
(3,719
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
$
|
95,426
|
|
$
|
40,544
|
|
$
|
(42,223
|
)
|
$
|
(24,101
|
)
|
|||
|
Income tax expense
|
(6,295
|
)
|
(5,865
|
)
|
(3,619
|
)
|
(3,695
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
89,131
|
|
$
|
34,679
|
|
$
|
(45,842
|
)
|
$
|
(27,796
|
)
|
|||
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
(489
|
)
|
75,120
|
|
(5,626
|
)
|
(12,661
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
88,642
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
$
|
(40,457
|
)
|
|||
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
|
116
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(5,689
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Company
|
$
|
88,758
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
$
|
(46,146
|
)
|
|||
|
Distributions to preferred stockholders
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
88,746
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
$
|
(46,146
|
)
|
|||
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|||
|
Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|||
|
Net income per share available to common stockholders
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
$
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|||
|
Weighted average number of common shares (basic)
|
111,989,686
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||||
|
Weighted average number of common shares (diluted)
|
112,138,223
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||||
|
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Net investment properties
|
$
|
2,641,704
|
|
$
|
2,449,260
|
|
$
|
2,511,646
|
|
$
|
2,646,392
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
122,154
|
|
$
|
163,053
|
|
$
|
89,169
|
|
$
|
65,004
|
|
|||
|
Dividends declared ($0.84 per share of common stock)
|
$
|
93,576
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
3,005,945
|
|
$
|
2,949,076
|
|
$
|
3,756,658
|
|
$
|
2,878,708
|
|
|||
|
Total debt, excluding held for sale
|
$
|
1,094,536
|
|
$
|
1,197,563
|
|
$
|
1,280,220
|
|
$
|
1,011,421
|
|
|||
|
Total equity
|
$
|
1,743,358
|
|
$
|
1,520,921
|
|
$
|
1,818,255
|
|
$
|
1,217,977
|
|
|||
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
|
$
|
292,537
|
|
$
|
241,348
|
|
$
|
165,476
|
|
$
|
201,589
|
|
|||
|
Adjusted FFO
(1)
|
$
|
241,162
|
|
$
|
182,732
|
|
$
|
111,663
|
|
$
|
116,171
|
|
|||
|
(1)
|
See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a detailed description and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO applicable to common stockholders.
|
50
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the combined consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" and "Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors" contained in this Annual Report and in our other reports that we file from time to time with the SEC.
Overview
Xenia is a self-advised and self-administered REIT that invests primarily in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels, with a focus on the Top 25 Markets as well as key leisure destinations in the United States. As of
December 31, 2015
, we owned
50
hotels,
48
of which are wholly owned, comprising
12,548
rooms, across
21
states and the District of Columbia, including a majority interest in two hotels owned through joint ventures. Our hotels are primarily operated by industry leaders such as Marriott ®, Hilton ®, Kimpton ®, Hyatt ®, Starwood ®, Aston ®, Fairmont ® and Loews ®, as well as leading independent management companies.
We plan to grow our business through a differentiated acquisition strategy, aggressive asset management and capital investment in our properties. We primarily target markets and sub-markets with particular positive characteristics, such as multiple demand generators, favorable supply and demand dynamics and attractive projected room revenue per available room ("RevPAR") growth with a focus on the Top 25 Markets as well as key leisure destinations. We believe our focus on a broader range of markets allows us to evaluate a greater number of acquisition opportunities and thereby be highly selective in our pursuit of only those opportunities which best fit our investment criteria. We primarily own and pursue hotels in the upscale, upper upscale and luxury segments that are affiliated with premium leading brands, as we believe that these segments yield attractive risk adjusted returns. Within these segments, we focus on hotels that will provide guests with a distinctive lodging experience, tailored to reflect local market environments rather than hotels that are heavily dependent on conventions and group business.
We also seek properties that exhibit an opportunity for us to enhance operating performance through aggressive asset management and targeted capital investment. While we do not operate our hotel properties, our asset management team and our executive management team monitor and work cooperatively with our hotel managers by conducting regular revenue, sales, and financial performance reviews and also perform in-depth on-site reviews focused on ongoing operating margin improvement initiatives. We interact frequently with our management companies and on-site management personnel, including conducting regular meetings with key executives of our management companies and brands. Through these efforts, we seek to improve property efficiencies, lower costs, maximize revenues, and enhance property operating margins which we expect will enhance returns to our stockholders.
Basis of Presentation
On February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust. Prior to the separation, we effectuated certain Reorganization Transactions which were designed to consolidate the ownership of our hotels into our Operating Partnership; consolidate our TRS lessees in our TRS; facilitate our separation from InvenTrust; and enable us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. The accompanying combined consolidated financial statements prior to the spin-off have been "carved out" of InvenTrust’s consolidated financial statements and reflect significant assumptions and allocations. The combined consolidated financial statements reflect our operations after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions, the disposition of other hotels previously owned by us, and the spin-off, and include allocations of costs from certain corporate and shared functions provided to us by InvenTrust, as well as costs associated with participation by certain of our executives in InvenTrust’s benefit plans. Corporate costs directly associated with our principal executive offices, personnel and other administrative costs are reflected as general and administrative expenses on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Additionally, prior to the spin-off, InvenTrust allocated to us a portion of its corporate overhead costs based upon our percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses. Based on these presentation matters, these financials may not be comparable to prior periods. In addition, certain reclassifications were made for presentation of lodging related activities on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
.
We have made, and InvenTrust has agreed to make, a joint election under section 336(e) of the Code with respect to our spin-off from InvenTrust. As a result of that election, our tax basis in our assets has been stepped up to their fair market value as of the date of the spin-off. The increased tax basis in our assets will increase the depreciation deductions we are allowed to claim over the useful life of these assets.
51
Self-Management of InvenTrust
From our formation in 2007 until March 2014, our management team, which had continuously been dedicated to InvenTrust’s entire hotel portfolio, including our portfolio and the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, was employed by InvenTrust’s external manager, Inland American Business Manager and Advisor, Inc. (the "Business Manager"), or one of its affiliates. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust entered into a series of agreements and amendments to existing agreements with affiliates of The Inland Group, Inc. pursuant to which InvenTrust began the process of becoming entirely self-managed (collectively, the "Self-Management Transactions"). After the Self-Management Transactions, our management team and our other employees ceased to be employed by the Business Manager or one of its affiliates and became our employees. In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate the management agreement with the Business Manager, hire all of the Business Manager’s employees, and acquire the assets or rights necessary to conduct the functions previously performed for InvenTrust by the Business Manager. Prior to the Self-Management Transactions, we were allocated a portion of the business management fee based upon our percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. As a result, the Company has not been allocated a business management fee after January 2014.
Separation from InvenTrust
As a result of the separation, we and InvenTrust operate separately, each as an independent company. In connection with and in order to effectuate the separation and distribution, we and InvenTrust entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement. In addition, we entered into various other agreements with InvenTrust to effect the separation and provide a framework for our relationship with InvenTrust post-separation, such as a Transition Services Agreement and an Employee Matters Agreement. These agreements provided for the allocation between us and InvenTrust of InvenTrust’s assets, liabilities and obligations (including its properties, employees and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after our separation from InvenTrust and govern certain relationships between us and InvenTrust after the separation. For more information regarding these agreements, see "Part II-Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence."
Market Outlook
The U.S. lodging industry continued to exhibit improved fundamentals throughout
2015
, driven by positive broader macroeconomic trends and favorable supply and demand dynamics in our target sub-markets. Lodging demand has historically exhibited a strong correlation to U.S. GDP growth, which continues
to grow modestly driven by business investment growth and a strong labor force but overall has been negatively impacted by the market slowdown in the Chinese economy and other factors such as turbulence in the energy markets
.
For the full year 2015, industry RevPAR increased by 6.3%, which was primarily driven by ADR growth of 4.4% and 1.7% increase in occupancy. While RevPAR increases are expected to slow down in 2016 to an average of 5% to 5.5%, overall fundamentals between supply and demand remain favorable, and supply growth remains below the long term historical average. Our strategy of targeting primarily the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations has proven to be beneficial as the majority of our markets do not see the same impact of the strengthening dollar and alternative rental accommodations as seen in other gateway markets. However, the Houston market, where 11% of our rooms are concentrated, continues to be challenged due to volatile energy markets and related impact on demand, which is expected to continue in 2016.
According to CBRE Hotels the decline in RevPAR in the Houston market during 2016 is expected to be 8.6%.
For 2016, we will benefit from a full year of operating results for our 2015 acquisitions and significant hotel developments, including the Hotel Palomar, Canary Santa Barbara, RiverPlace Hotel, Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook in addition to the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016.
While the earnings growth will be partially offset by the loss of earnings from our recent sales of the Hyatt Regency Orange County in October 2015 and
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville in February 2016
, we anticipate that the overall impact of our specific-property level initiatives and renovations of existing properties will be favorable to our results of operations and on our key performance measures.
As noted above, the current outlook for the lodging industry is uncertain; therefore, there can be no assurances that any increases in hotel revenues or earnings at our properties will continue for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, slower than anticipated growth in the economy, changes in travel patterns, and continued volatility in energy markets. See "Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors."
52
Significant Events
The following events were significant highlights during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
:
|
•
|
On February 3, 2015, we spun-off from our former parent company, InvenTrust Properties Corp., and became a standalone public company.
On February 4, 2015, Xenia’s Common Stock began trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "XHR."
|
|
•
|
On February 4, 2015, in conjunction with the listing of the Company's common stock on the NYSE, the Company commenced a modified "Dutch Auction" self-tender offer (the "Tender Offer") to purchase for cash up to $125 million in value of shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price not greater than $21.00 nor less than $19.00 per share, net to the seller in cash, less any applicable withholding of taxes and without interest. The Tender Offer expired on March 5, 2015. As a result of the Tender Offer, the Company accepted for purchase 1,759,344 shares of its Common Stock at a purchase price of $21.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $36.9 million (excluding fees and expenses relating to the Tender Offer), which was funded from cash on hand.
|
|
•
|
We acquired three hotels in July 2015 for $245 million, which included: The Canary Santa Barbara, Hotel Palomar Philadelphia and RiverPlace Hotel. In July 2015, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire the Hotel Commonwealth in Boston, Massachusetts for a purchase price of $136 million, excluding closing costs. The sale was contingent upon the seller completing a 96 room expansion. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a non-refundable deposit of $20 million, which is included in other assets on the combined consolidated balance sheet. The sale of the property closed in January of 2016.
|
|
•
|
In August 2015, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston began operations as a
50
room boutique lifestyle hotel. The total development cost of the property was
$32 million
. In October 2015, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook began operations as a
100
room boutique lifestyle hotel. The total development cost of the property was
$45 million
.
|
|
•
|
In October 2015, the Company executed a $175 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable spread, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in February 2021. In conjunction with the term loan, the Company executed interest rate swaps to fix LIBOR over the period of the loan at 1.29%. As a result the effective annual interest rate on the term loan is
2.79%
as of December 31, 2015. Proceeds from the $175 million unsecured term loan were used to pay off the $53 million mortgage loan collaterized by the Marriott San Francisco Airport Waterfront and to pay down the outstanding balance on our unsecured revolving credit facility. Additionally, the Company executed a $125 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable spread, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in October 2022. The $125 million unsecured term loan was funded in January 2016 in connection with the previously announced acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in Boston, Massachusetts. In December 2015, the Company executed forward starting interest rate swaps to fix LIBOR over the period of the loan at 1.83%. As a result the effective annual interest rate on the term loan is
3.63%
as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
•
|
Also in October 2015, the Company closed on the sale of the Hyatt Regency Orange County hotel for a sale price of $137 million. In connection with this sale, the Company paid off its property level mortgage with an outstanding balance of $61.9 million and retained the $5.9 million balance in the hotel's capital expenditure reserve account.
|
|
•
|
Also in October 2015 the Company refinanced a mortgage for one hotel with a principal balance of $30.3 million. The new loan is for $63.0 million, has a term of 10 years and carries a fixed annual interest rate of 4.48%.
|
|
•
|
In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company paid off three additional hotel level mortgages in the amount of $108.2 million. Further, the Company also obtained $7.5 million in incremental proceeds under the terms of another existing mortgage loan in November 2015.
|
|
•
|
In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Repurchase Program pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program.
|
Our Customers
We generate a significant portion of our revenue from the following broad customer groups: transient business, group business and contract business. Transient business broadly represents individual business or leisure travelers. Business travelers make up
53
the majority of transient demand at our hotels. Therefore, we will be more affected by trends in business travel than trends in leisure demand. Group business represents clusters of guestrooms booked together, usually with a minimum of 10 rooms. Contract business refers to blocks of rooms sold to a specific company for an extended period of time at significantly discounted rates. Airline crews are typical generators of contract demand at some of our hotels. Additionally, contract rates may be utilized by hotels that are located in markets that are experiencing consistently lower levels of demand.
Our Revenues and Expenses
Revenues
Our revenues are derived from hotel operations and are composed of the following sources:
|
•
|
Room revenues - Represents the sale of room rentals at our hotel properties and accounts for a substantial majority of our total revenue. Occupancy and ADR are the major drivers of room revenue. The business mix and distribution channel mix of the hotels are significant determinants of ADR.
|
|
•
|
Food and beverage revenues - Occupancy and the type of customer staying at the hotel are the major drivers of food and beverage revenue (i.e., group business typically generates more food and beverage business through catering functions when compared to transient business, which may or may not utilize the hotel’s food and beverage outlets).
|
|
•
|
Other revenues - Represents ancillary revenue such as parking, telephone and other guest services, and tenant leases. Our transition to the Eleventh Revised Edition of USALI during the year ended December 31, 2015, resulted in resort fees being recorded in other revenues rather than room revenues. Occupancy and the nature of the property are the main drivers of other revenue.
|
Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of costs to provide hotel services and corporate-level expenses. The following are components of our expenses:
|
•
|
Room expenses - These costs include housekeeping wages and payroll taxes, room supplies, laundry services and front desk costs. Similar to room revenue, occupancy is the major driver of room expense and as a result, room expense has a significant correlation to room revenue. These costs as a percentage of revenue can increase based on increases in salaries and wages, as well as on the level of service and amenities that are provided.
|
|
•
|
Food and beverage expenses - These expenses primarily include food, beverage and associated labor costs. Occupancy and the type of customer staying at the hotel are major drivers of food and beverage expense (i.e., catered functions generally are more profitable than on-property food and beverage outlet sales), which correlates closely with food and beverage revenue.
|
|
•
|
Other direct expenses - These expenses primarily include labor and other costs associated with other revenues, such as parking and other guest services.
|
|
•
|
Other indirect expenses - These expenses primarily include hotel costs associated with general and administrative, sales and marketing, information technology and telecommunications, repairs and maintenance and utility costs.
|
|
•
|
Management fees - Base management fees are computed as a percentage of gross revenue. The management fees also include incentive management fees, which are typically a percentage of net operating income (or similar measurement of hotel profitability) above an annual threshold based on our total capital investment in the hotel. Franchise fees are computed as a percentage of rooms revenue. See "Part I-Item 2. Our Principal Agreements."
|
|
•
|
Depreciation and amortization expense - These are non-cash expenses that primarily consist of depreciation of fixed assets such as buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment at our hotels, as well as certain corporate assets. Amortization expense primarily consists of amortization of acquired advance bookings, which are amortized over the life of the related lease or term.
|
|
•
|
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance - Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance includes the payments due in the respective jurisdictions where our hotels are located, partially offset by refunds from prior year real estate tax appeals, and payments due under insurance policies for our hotel portfolio.
|
54
|
•
|
Ground lease expense - The ground lease expense represents the monthly base rent associated with land underlying our hotels and/or meeting facilities that we lease from third parties. It also includes the above and below market lease amortization for lease intangibles determined as part of the initial purchase price allocation at acquisition.
|
|
•
|
General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation expense for our corporate staff and personnel supporting our business, office administrative and related expenses. Corporate costs directly associated with Xenia’s principal executive offices, personnel and other administrative costs are reflected as general and administrative expense on the combined consolidated financial statements. Additionally, prior to our spin-off InvenTrust allocated to Xenia a portion of corporate overhead costs incurred by InvenTrust which was based upon Xenia’s percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust and was reflected in general and administrative expense. Upon our separation from InvenTrust, we were no longer allocated a portion of InvenTrust’s corporate overhead. We were a party to a Transition Services Agreement with InvenTrust, pursuant to which we were to be charged agreed-upon amounts for the corporate services we received. The Transition Services Agreement was terminated in the second quarter of 2015.
|
|
•
|
Business management fee - During the years ended December 31,
2014
, and
2013
, InvenTrust paid an annual business management fee to the Business Manager based on the average invested assets. We were allocated a portion of the business management fee based upon our percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust entered into the Self-Management Transactions. After the Self-Management Transactions, our management team and our other employees ceased to be employed by the Business Manager or one of its affiliates and became our employees. In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate the management agreement with the Business Manager, hire all of the Business Manager’s employees and acquire the assets or rights necessary to conduct the functions previously performed for InvenTrust by the Business Manager. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. As a result, we were not allocated a business management fee after January 2014.
|
|
•
|
Acquisition transaction costs - Acquisition transaction costs typically consist of legal fees, other professional fees, transfer taxes and other direct costs associated with our pursuit of hotel investments. As a result, these costs will vary depending on our level of ongoing acquisition activity.
|
|
•
|
Provision for asset impairment - We own real estate, intangible assets and other long-lived assets generally held for the long-term. We assess the carrying values of our long-lived assets and evaluate these assets for impairment as discussed in "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates." These evaluations have, in the past, resulted in impairment losses for certain of these assets based on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding those assets and our estimates of the fair value of those assets. Based on economic conditions or other factors applicable to a specific property, we may be required to take additional impairment losses to reflect further declines in our asset and/or investment values.
|
|
•
|
Separation and other startup related expenses - We incurred expenses related to our spin-off from InvenTrust. This included fees paid to unrelated third parties, the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, costs related to the tender offer and other startup costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly traded company.
|
Most categories of variable operating expenses, including labor costs such as housekeeping, fluctuate with changes in occupancy. Increases in occupancy are accompanied by increases in most categories of variable operating expenses, while increases in ADR typically only result in increases in limited categories of operating costs and expenses, such as management fees and franchise fees, which are based on hotel revenues. Thus, changes in ADR have a more significant impact on operating margins than changes in occupancy.
Factors that May Affect Results of Operations
The principal factors affecting our operating results include overall demand for hotel rooms compared to the supply of available hotel rooms, economic conditions, and the ability of our third-party management companies to increase or maintain revenues while controlling expenses.
|
•
|
Demand and economic conditions - Consumer demand for lodging, especially business travel, is closely linked to the performance of the overall economy and is sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels. Declines in consumer demand due to adverse general economic conditions, risks affecting or reducing travel patterns, lower consumer confidence and adverse political conditions can lower the revenues and profitability of our hotel operations. As a result, changes in consumer demand and general business cycles can subject and have subjected our revenues to significant volatility. See "Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry."
|
55
|
•
|
Supply - New hotel room supply is an important factor that can affect the lodging industry’s performance. Room rates and occupancy, and thus RevPAR, tend to increase when demand growth exceeds supply growth. The addition of new competitive hotels affects the ability of existing hotels to drive growth in RevPAR, and thus profits. New development is driven largely by construction costs, the availability of financing and expected performance of existing hotels.
|
|
•
|
Third-party hotel managers - We depend on the performance of third-party hotel management companies that manage the operations of each of our hotels under long-term agreements. Our operating results could be materially and adversely affected if any of our third-party managers fail to provide quality services and amenities, or otherwise fail to manage our hotels in our best interest. We believe we have good relationships with our third-party managers and are committed to the continued growth and development of these relationships.
|
|
•
|
Fixed nature of expenses - Many of the expenses associated with operating our hotels are relatively fixed. These expenses include certain personnel costs, rent, property taxes, insurance and utilities, as well as sales and marketing expenses. If we are unable to decrease these costs significantly or rapidly when demand for our hotels decreases, the resulting decline in our revenues can have an adverse effect on our net cash flow, margins and profits. This effect can be especially pronounced during periods of economic contraction or slow economic growth.
|
|
•
|
Seasonality - The lodging industry is seasonal in nature, which can be expected to cause fluctuations in our hotel room revenues, occupancy levels, room rates, operating expenses and cash flows. The periods during which our hotels experience higher or lower levels of demand vary from property to property and depend upon location, type of property and competitive mix within the specific location. Based on historical results for our portfolio, our revenues and operating income are lowest during the first quarter of each year, which we expect to be consistent from year to year for our current portfolio.
|
|
•
|
Competition - The lodging industry is highly competitive. Our hotels compete with other hotels and alternative accommodations for guests in each of their markets based on a number of factors, including, among others, room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels and amenities, location, brand affiliation, reputation, and reservation systems. Competition is often specific to the individual markets in which our hotels are located and includes competition from existing and new hotels. We believe that hotels, such as those in our portfolio, will enjoy the competitive advantages associated with operating under such brands.
|
Key Indicators of Operating Performance
We measure hotel results of operations and the operating performance of our business by evaluating financial and non-financial metrics such as RevPAR; ADR; OCC; EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA; FFO and Adjusted FFO. We evaluate individual hotel and company-wide performance with comparisons to budgets, prior periods and competing properties. ADR, occupancy and RevPAR may be impacted by macroeconomic factors as well as regional and local economies and events. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for further discussion of the Company's use, definitions and limitations of EBITDA, FFO, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
General
The preparation of combined consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We consider the following policies critical because they require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain, involve various assumptions, require management judgment, and because they are important for understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. As a result, these accounting policies could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments on an ongoing basis, based on information that is then available to us, our historical experiences and various matters that we believe are reasonable and appropriate for consideration under the circumstances. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates due to changes in judgments, assumptions and conditions as a result of unforeseen events or otherwise, which could have a material impact on financial position or results of operations.
Investment in Hotel Properties
Upon acquisition, we allocate the purchase price of our hotel properties based on the fair value of the acquired land, land improvements, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Identifiable intangible assets or liabilities typically arise from contractual arrangements assumed in connection with the transaction, including terms
56
that are above or below market compared to an estimated market agreement at the acquisition date. Any additional amounts are allocated to goodwill as required, based on the remaining purchase price in excess of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The allocation of the purchase price to elements of our acquired hotel properties is an area that requires judgment and significant estimates. We expense acquisition costs as incurred. All costs related to finding, analyzing and negotiating a transaction are expensed as incurred as a general and administrative expense, whether or not the acquisition is completed.
Cost Capitalization and Depreciation/Amortization Policies
Our investments in hotel properties are carried at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 30 years for buildings and improvements, and 5 to 15 years for site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment. Intangible assets arising from contractual arrangements are typically amortized over the life of the contract. Renovations, improvements and/or replacements at the hotel properties that improve or extend the life of the assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Furniture, fixtures and equipment under capital leases are carried at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Cost capitalization and the estimate of useful lives requires us to make subjective assessments of our properties for the purposes of determining the amount of depreciation expense to reflect each year with respect to the assets. These assessments may impact our results of operations.
Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale
The Company accounts for dispositions in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360-20, Real Estate Sales. The Company recognizes gain in full when real estate is sold, provided (a) the profit is determinable, that is, the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated, and (b) the earnings process is virtually complete, that is, the seller is not obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit. The Company recorded certain transactions as discontinued operations for years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 in accordance with FASB ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements-Discontinued Operations.
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which includes amendments that change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and require additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations. In addition, ASU 2014-08 expands the disclosure requirements for disposals that meet the definition of a discontinued operation and requires entities to disclose information about disposals of individually significant components that do not meet the definition of discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that began after December 15, 2014. We elected to early adopt ASU 2014-08, effective January 1, 2014.
We will classify a hotel as held for sale when a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash, no significant financing contingencies exist, and the sale is expected to close within one year. If these criteria are met, we will suspend depreciation and amortization of the hotel property and an impairment loss (if any), will be recognized if the fair value less costs to sell is lower than the carrying amount of the hotel. We will classify the loss, together with the related operating results, in continuing operations on the statements of operations and comprehensive income unless the sale represents a strategic shift and has, or will have, a major effect on the entity’s results and operations, in which cash it will be presented as discontinued operations, and we will classify the assets and related liabilities as held for sale on the balance sheet.
Impairment
We review our investments in hotel properties including the related intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may cause a review include, but are not limited to, when a hotel property experiences a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel property will be sold before the end of its useful life, adverse changes in the demand for lodging at the properties due to declining national or local economic conditions and/or new hotel construction in markets where the hotels are located. When such conditions exist, we perform an analysis to determine if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operations and the proceeds from the ultimate disposition of a hotel exceed its carrying value. If it is determined that the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an adjustment to reduce the carrying amount to the related hotel’s estimated fair market value is recorded and an impairment loss recognized. In the evaluation of impairment of our hotel properties, we make many assumptions and estimates including projected cash flows both from operations and eventual disposition, expected useful life and holding period, future required capital expenditures, and fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates, and comparable selling prices. The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties is a significant estimate that can and
57
does change based on our continuous process of analyzing each property and reviewing assumptions about uncertain inherent factors, as well as the economic condition of the property at a particular point in time.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment by making a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the specific property's fair value is less than its carrying amount before application of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The two-step goodwill test is not performed for those assets where it is concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a specific property is greater than its carrying amount. For those specific properties where this is not the case, the two step procedure detailed below is followed in order to determine the amount of goodwill impairment. In the first step, the Company compares the estimated fair value of each property with goodwill to the carrying value of the property’s assets, including goodwill. The fair value is based on estimated future cash flow projections that utilize discount and capitalization rates, which are generally unobservable in the market place (Level 3 inputs), but approximate the inputs the Company believes would be utilized by market participants in assessing fair value. The estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors, including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions. If the carrying amount of the property’s assets, including goodwill, exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In this second step, if the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded in an amount equal to that excess.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of amounts derived from hotel operations, including the sales of rooms, food and beverage and other ancillary amenities. Revenue is recognized when rooms are occupied and services have been rendered. Cash received prior to guest arrival is recorded as an advance deposit from the guest and recognized as revenue at the time of occupancy. Sales, use, occupancy, and similar taxes are collected and presented on a net basis (excluded from revenues) in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. For retail operations, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the retail leases. These revenue sources are affected by conditions impacting the travel and hospitality industry as well as competition from other hotels and businesses in similar markets.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective, although it will not affect the accounting for rental related revenues. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, pursuant to ASU No. 2015-09 which deferred the adoption date by one year. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2014-09 will have on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.
Consolidation
We evaluate our investments in limited liability companies and partnerships to determine whether such entities may be a variable interest entity ("VIE"). If the entity is a VIE, the determination of whether we are the primary beneficiary must be made. We will consolidate a VIE if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, as defined in FASB ASC 810, Consolidation. The equity method of accounting is applied to entities in which we are not the primary beneficiary as defined FASB ASC 810, or the entity is not a VIE and we do not have effective control, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The ASU amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities ("VIEs") and general partners' investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted.
The Company is evaluating the effect of ASU No. 2015-02, but does not expect it to have a significant impact on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Non-controlling Interests
The Company’s combined consolidated financial statements include entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Non-controlling interest is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a consolidating parent. Such non-controlling interests are reported on the combined consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and non-controlling interests. Income or loss is allocated to non-controlling interests based on their weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The combined
58
consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for stockholders’ equity, non-controlling interests and total equity.
However, if the Company’s non-controlling interests are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the issuer, they must be classified outside of permanent equity. The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions. Additionally, with respect to non-controlling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company evaluates whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract. As of
December 31, 2015
, all share-based payments awards are included in permanent equity.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the consolidated results of the Company include the following ownership interests held by owners other than the Company: (i) the common units in the Operating Partnership held by certain of the Company's executive officers and Board of Directors, and (ii) the outside ownership interest in our two joint ventures.
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as, and has operated in a manner that will allow the Company to qualify as, a REIT for federal income tax purposes. So long as the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is currently distributed to its stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and will not be eligible to re-elect REIT status during the four years following the failure. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Accordingly, the Company, through its Operating Partnership, leases all of its hotels to subsidiaries of its TRS. The TRS is subject to federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates. Lease revenues at REIT subsidiaries or landlords and lease expense from the TRS lessees are eliminated in consolidation for financial statement purposes.
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax-planning strategies. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company’s analysis in determining the deferred tax asset valuation allowance involves management judgment and assumptions.
Income tax expense in the combined consolidated financial statements for the period from January 1, 2015 through February 3, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was calculated on a "carve-out" basis from InvenTrust.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company has adopted a share-based incentive plan that provides for the grant of stock options, stock awards, restricted stock units, performance units and other equity-based awards. Share-based compensation is measured at the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant, adjusted for forfeitures, and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the longest vesting period for each grant for the entire award. The determination of fair value of these awards is subjective and involves significant estimates and assumptions including expected volatility of the Company's shares, expected dividend yield, expected term and assumptions of whether certain of these awards will achieve parity with other Operating Partnership units or achieve performance thresholds. Share-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and capitalized in building and other improvements in the combined consolidated balance sheets for certain employees that manage property developments, renovations and capital improvements.
59
Results of Operations
Overview
As of
December 31, 2015
, we owned
50
operating hotels, including two hotels owned by two consolidated joint ventures (the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston, which was completed and opened to the public on August 27, 2015 and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which was completed and opened to the public on October 22, 2015). At
December 31, 2014
, we owned
46
operating hotels, and two hotel developments owned by two consolidated joint ventures that were under development. At
December 31, 2013
, we owned
48
operating hotels. Based on when a property was acquired, disposed of or impacted by property renovations, operating results for certain properties are not comparable for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
.
Sold properties are excluded from our combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as part of continuing operations if they represent a strategic shift or have a major effect on results of operations in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08 and therefore are reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented. On November 17, 2014, InvenTrust sold the Suburban Select Service Portfolio for an aggregate gross disposition price of $1.1 billion. Prior to the sale transaction, we oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. This sale reflected a strategic shift pursuant to ASU No. 2014-08 and had a major impact on our consolidated financial statements; therefore the operations of these 52 hotels are reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
. Prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2014-08, which was early adopted for the year ended December 31, 2014, all operations related to the disposition through the date of sale were considered discontinued operations in the combined consolidated financial statements.
The following represents the disposition details for the properties sold in the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands, except rooms):
|
Property
|
Date
|
Rooms
|
Gross Disposition Price
|
|||||
|
Hyatt Regency Orange County
(1)
|
10/2015
|
656
|
$
|
137,000
|
|
|||
|
Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center
(1)
|
05/2014
|
166
|
13,250
|
|
||||
|
DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria
(1)
|
08/2014
|
154
|
12,600
|
|
||||
|
Suburban Select Service Portfolio - 52 properties
(2)
|
11/2014
|
6,976
|
1,071,000
|
|
||||
|
Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands
(1)
|
12/2014
|
161
|
4,600
|
|
||||
|
Baymont Inn & Suites Jacksonville
(2)
|
02/2013
|
118
|
3,500
|
|
||||
|
Homewood Suites Durham
(2)
|
03/2013
|
96
|
8,300
|
|
||||
|
Fairfield Inn Ann Arbor
(2)
|
08/2013
|
109
|
8,000
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
8,436
|
$
|
1,258,250
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Included in net income from continuing operations in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods of ownership.
|
|
(2)
|
Included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods of ownership.
|
60
The following represents our acquisitions activity for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands, except rooms):
|
Property
|
Location
|
Date
|
No. of Rooms
|
Purchase Price
|
||||||
|
Canary Santa Barbara
(1)
|
Santa Barbara, CA
|
07/2015
|
97
|
$
|
80,000
|
|
||||
|
Hotel Palomar Philadelphia
(1)
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
07/2015
|
230
|
100,000
|
|
|||||
|
RiverPlace Hotel
(1)
|
Portland, OR
|
07/2015
|
84
|
65,000
|
|
|||||
|
Total purchased in the year ended December 31, 2015
|
411
|
$
|
245,000
|
|
||||||
|
Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel
|
Honolulu, HI
|
02/2014
|
645
|
$
|
183,000
|
|
||||
|
Key West Bottling Court
|
Key West, FL
|
11/2014
|
—
|
(2)
|
7,400
|
|
||||
|
Total purchased in the year ended December 31, 2014
|
645
|
$
|
190,400
|
|
||||||
|
Bohemian Hotel Celebration, an Autograph Collection Hotel
(1)(3)
|
Celebration, FL
|
02/2013
|
115
|
$
|
22,000
|
|
||||
|
Andaz San Diego
|
San Diego, CA
|
03/2013
|
159
|
53,000
|
|
|||||
|
Residence Inn Denver City Center
|
Denver, CO
|
04/2013
|
228
|
80,000
|
|
|||||
|
Westin Galleria Houston
(1)
|
Houston, TX
|
08/2013
|
487
|
120,000
|
|
|||||
|
Westin Oaks Houston at the Galleria
(1)
|
Houston, TX
|
08/2013
|
406
|
100,000
|
|
|||||
|
Andaz Savannah
(1)
|
Savannah, GA
|
09/2013
|
151
|
43,000
|
|
|||||
|
Andaz Napa
(1)
|
Napa, CA
|
09/2013
|
141
|
72,000
|
|
|||||
|
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara
(3)
|
Santa Clara, CA
|
09/2013
|
501
|
99,000
|
|
|||||
|
Loews New Orleans Hotel
|
New Orleans, LA
|
10/2013
|
285
|
74,500
|
|
|||||
|
Lorien Hotel & Spa
|
Alexandria, VA
|
10/2013
|
107
|
45,250
|
|
|||||
|
Hotel Monaco Chicago
(1)
|
Chicago, IL
|
11/2013
|
191
|
56,000
|
|
|||||
|
Hotel Monaco Denver
(1)
|
Denver, CO
|
11/2013
|
189
|
75,000
|
|
|||||
|
Hotel Monaco Salt Lake City
(1)
|
Salt Lake City, UT
|
11/2013
|
225
|
58,000
|
|
|||||
|
Hyatt Key West Resort & Spa
|
Key West, FL
|
11/2013
|
118
|
76,000
|
|
|||||
|
Total purchased in the year ended December 31, 2013
|
3,303
|
$
|
973,750
|
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
The hotel was acquired as part of various portfolio acquisitions. Therefore the property level purchase price was an allocation of the total purchase price for the portfolio acquired.
|
|
(2)
|
This is a retail building adjacent to our Hyatt Key West Resort & Spa hotel, a portion of which is used for office space and a portion of which is leased to third party tenants.
|
|
(3)
|
The total purchase price was contingent to an earn-out provision per the terms of the respective purchase and sale agreement. The amount as of
December 31, 2015
includes the final earn-out.
|
61
The following charts show the geographic diversification of our hotel properties as of
December 31, 2015
:
|
Number of Hotels by Region
(1)
|
Number of Rooms by Region
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the diversification of our hotel properties as defined by STR.
|
The following table sets forth certain operating information for our 51, 49, and 51 hotel properties owned during the respective years by geographic diversification for the years ended
December 31, 2015
, 2014 and 2013, respectively:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015
(2)(3)(4)
|
2014
(3)(4)
|
2013
(3)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Region
(1)
|
OCC
|
ADR
|
RevPAR
|
OCC
|
ADR
|
RevPAR
|
OCC
|
ADR
|
RevPAR
|
||||||||||||
|
South Atlantic
|
77.5
|
%
|
$179.21
|
$138.95
|
77.3
|
%
|
$169.35
|
$130.85
|
73.6
|
%
|
$151.40
|
$111.39
|
|||||||||
|
West South Central
|
71.0
|
%
|
$186.79
|
$132.64
|
72.2
|
%
|
$184.23
|
$133.02
|
69.6
|
%
|
$171.13
|
$119.08
|
|||||||||
|
Pacific
|
80.9
|
%
|
$205.87
|
$166.50
|
80.1
|
%
|
$188.31
|
$150.89
|
79.7
|
%
|
$167.61
|
$133.67
|
|||||||||
|
Mountain
|
78.1
|
%
|
$177.86
|
$138.84
|
78.7
|
%
|
$167.93
|
$132.12
|
72.1
|
%
|
$147.84
|
$106.56
|
|||||||||
|
Other
|
74.9
|
%
|
$175.22
|
$131.27
|
74.1
|
%
|
$165.07
|
$122.32
|
73.1
|
%
|
$146.29
|
$106.96
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
76.2
|
%
|
$187.04
|
$142.59
|
76.2
|
%
|
$176.80
|
$134.73
|
73.6
|
%
|
$158.00
|
$116.23
|
|||||||||
|
(1)
|
Represents our diversification of our hotel properties as defined by STR.
|
|
(2)
|
Upon completion of construction in the third and fourth quarters of 2015 the two hotels under development were included as of the end of the applicable period from the date their respective operations began.
|
|
(3)
|
For hotels acquired during the period, operating results and statistics are only included since the respective date of acquisition. For hotels disposed of during the period, operating results and statistics are only included through the date of the respective disposition.
|
|
(4)
|
Full year 2014 was negatively impacted by the August 2014 earthquake in Northern California, which resulted in damage at two of our hotels, the Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa and the Andaz Napa. The Marriott sustained limited damage and fully re-opened in October 2014. The Andaz partially re-opened in December 2014 with a total of 17,106 room nights out of order in the second half of 2014, and another 682 nights out of order in January 2015.
|
62
Comparison of the year ended
December 31, 2015
to the year ended
December 31, 2014
Operating Information
The following table sets forth certain operating information for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and 2014:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
Variance
|
|||||||
|
Number of properties at January 1
|
46
|
48
|
(4.2)%
|
||||||
|
Properties acquired or added to portfolio upon completion of construction
(1)
|
5
|
1
|
400.0%
|
||||||
|
Properties disposed
|
(1)
|
(3)
|
(66.7)%
|
||||||
|
Number of properties at December 31
|
50
|
46
|
8.7%
|
||||||
|
Number of rooms at January 1
|
12,636
|
12,472
|
1.3%
|
||||||
|
Rooms in properties acquired or added to portfolio upon completion of construction
(1)(2)
|
568
|
645
|
(11.9)%
|
||||||
|
Rooms in properties disposed
|
(656)
|
(481)
|
36.4%
|
||||||
|
Number of rooms at December 31
|
12,548
|
12,636
|
(0.7)%
|
||||||
|
Portfolio Statistics:
|
|||||||||
|
Occupancy
(1) (3) (4)
|
76.2
|
%
|
76.2
|
%
|
—%
|
||||
|
ADR
(1) (3) (4)
|
$
|
187.04
|
|
$
|
176.80
|
|
5.8%
|
||
|
RevPAR
(1) (3) (4)
|
$
|
142.59
|
|
$
|
134.73
|
|
5.8%
|
||
|
Hotel operating income (in thousands)
(5)
|
$
|
365,902
|
|
$
|
333,363
|
|
9.8%
|
||
|
(1)
|
The results for the year ended December 31, 2015, include the consolidated operating results of the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston that opened on August 27, 2015 and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook that opened on October 21, 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
The rooms additions include total number of rooms acquired and total number of rooms put into operations upon the completion of construction or renovation.
|
|
(3)
|
For hotels acquired during the applicable period, only includes operating statistics since the date of acquisition. For hotels disposed of during the period, operating results and statistics are only included through the date of the respective disposition.
|
|
(4)
|
Does not include hotel statistics for hotel dispositions classified as discontinued operations.
|
|
(5)
|
Hotel operating income represents the difference between total revenues and total hotel operating expenses.
|
Operating Information Comparison
Revenues
Revenues consists of room, food and beverage, and other revenues from our hotels, as follows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
Increase / (Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Room revenues
|
$
|
663,224
|
|
$
|
631,901
|
|
$
|
31,323
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Food and beverage revenues
|
259,036
|
|
235,066
|
|
23,970
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other revenues
|
53,884
|
|
59,699
|
|
(5,815
|
)
|
(9.7
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
976,144
|
|
$
|
926,666
|
|
$
|
49,478
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|||
Room revenues
Room revenues increased by
$31.3 million
, or
5.0%
, to
$663.2 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$631.9 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, of which $2.9 million was contributed by Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014, $16.3 million was contributed by the three hotels acquired in July 2015, $12.4 million was contributed by five of our hotel properties in California driven by completed renovations and higher revenue in the fourth quarter compared to prior year that was negatively impacted by the August 2014 Napa earthquake and $2.1 million was contributed by the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015. A net increase of
$21.4 million was contributed by our remaining 35
comparable hotels that were owned during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
and 2014,
attributable to a
4.6% improvement in RevPAR driven by a 3.9% increase in ADR. These increases were
offset by a reduction in revenue of
63
$15.4 million related to three properties disposed of in 2014 and one property disposed of in October 2015 and $4.3 million attributed to four of our hotel properties in the Houston market that were negatively impacted by the continued volatility of the energy market during the year. Our transition to the Eleventh Revised Edition of USALI in the first quarter of 2015 resulted in $4.1 million of resort fees being recorded in other revenues rather than room revenues during the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $3.3 million was attributable to the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel.
Food and beverage revenues
Food and beverage revenues increased by
$24.0 million
, or
10.2%
, to
$259.0 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$235.1 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, of which
$8.1 million
of the increase was attributable to reclassifications of revenues historically included in other revenues, $7.3 million was attributable to the three hotels acquired in July 2015, $2.5 million was attributed by the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015, and net increases of $10.9 million were attributable to our remaining hotel portfolio due to higher banquet food and beverage and ancillary revenues, as well as, continued strong performance in other food and beverage outlets. These increases for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, were offset by decreases of $4.8 million related to three properties disposed of in 2014 and one hotel disposed of in October 2015.
Other revenues
Other revenues decreased by
$5.8 million
, or
9.7%
, to
$53.9 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$59.7 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, of which
$8.1 million
was attributed to the reclassifications of revenues historically included in other revenues to food and beverage revenue, $1.1 million due to a reduction in guarantee income recorded from the manager of one hotel, and a net decrease of $6.6 million related to our remaining portfolio, the three properties disposed of in 2014 and one hotel property disposed of in October 2015. These decreases were offset by increases of $4.1 million of resort fees that were previously included in room revenues for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
as a result of the transition to the Eleventh Revised Edition of USALI in the first quarter of 2015, which were primarily contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014 and additional increases of $5.9 million contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel and the three hotels acquired in July 2015.
Hotel Operating Expenses
Hotel operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
Increase / (Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Hotel operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Room expenses
|
$
|
148,492
|
|
$
|
140,128
|
|
$
|
8,364
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|||
|
Food and beverage expenses
|
167,840
|
|
158,243
|
|
9,597
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other direct expenses
|
17,984
|
|
28,556
|
|
(10,572
|
)
|
(37.0
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Other indirect expenses
|
226,108
|
|
214,272
|
|
11,836
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Management and franchise fees
|
49,818
|
|
52,104
|
|
(2,286
|
)
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total hotel operating expenses
|
$
|
610,242
|
|
$
|
593,303
|
|
$
|
16,939
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|||
Total hotel operating expenses
Total hotel operating expenses increased
$16.9 million
, or
2.9%
, to
$610.2 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$593.3 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, of which $4.4 million of the increase was contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014, $14.6 million was contributed by the three hotels acquired in July 2015 and a
net increase of $14.6 million was contributed by our remaining properties. These increases were offset by a $16.7 million decrease in total hotel operating expenses attributable to the three hotels sold in 2014 and one hotel sold in October 2015.
Other direct expenses decreased
$10.6 million
, or
37.0%
, to
$18.0 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, respectively, from
$28.6 million
f
or the
year ended
December 31, 2014
,
respectively, which was attributable to reclassifications between other direct expenses and other indirect expenses to reflect presentation of such costs going forward.
64
Corporate and Other Expenses
Corporate and other expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
Increase / (Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
148,009
|
|
$
|
141,807
|
|
$
|
6,202
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|||
|
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance
|
49,717
|
|
44,625
|
|
5,092
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Ground lease expense
|
5,204
|
|
5,541
|
|
(337
|
)
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
25,556
|
|
38,895
|
|
(13,339
|
)
|
(34.3
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Business management fees
|
—
|
|
1,474
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
5,046
|
|
1,192
|
|
3,854
|
|
323.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Pre-opening expenses
|
1,411
|
|
—
|
|
1,411
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
—
|
|
5,378
|
|
(5,378
|
)
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Separation and other start-up related expenses
|
26,887
|
|
—
|
|
26,887
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
Total corporate and other expenses
|
$
|
261,830
|
|
$
|
238,912
|
|
$
|
22,918
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$6.2 million
, or
4.4%
, to
$148.0 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$141.8 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, of which $5.8 million of the increase was contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. The remaining $3.8 million increase is the result of capital expenditures to improve our properties offset by decreases of $3.4 million for three properties disposed of in 2014 and one hotel disposed of in October 2015.
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance expense increased
$5.1 million
, or
11.4%
, to
$49.7 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$44.6 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
. Real estate taxes and personal property taxes increased across the portfolio due to increased assessed property values or tax rates at certain properties, partially offset by refunds from prior year real estate tax appeals.
Ground lease expense
Ground lease expense decreased
$0.3 million
, or
6.1%
, to
$5.2 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$5.5 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, comprised primarily of an increase of $0.4 million attributable to the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014 offset by decreases of $0.9 million for a property sold in 2014.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased
$13.3 million
, or
34.3%
, to
$25.6 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$38.9 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
. This was due to InvenTrust allocations for $16.2 million for
year ended
December 31, 2014
, offset by an increase in bonus expense, non-cash stock compensation to our Board of Directors, executive officers and certain members of management, and net increases in other operating costs related to salaries and professional fees during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
. General and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2015, was not fully comparable to the year ended December 31, 2014 for these reasons. Additionally, the year ended December 31, 2014 may have included non-recurring costs and other allocations related to our spin-off from our former parent company.
Business management fee
Business management fee expense decreased
$1.5 million
to $0 for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
compared to the
year ended
December 31, 2014
. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust executed the Self-Management Transactions. In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate the management agreement with the Business Manager, hire all of the Business Manager’s employees and acquire the assets or rights necessary to conduct the functions previously performed for InvenTrust by the Business Manager. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014.
65
Acquisition transaction costs
Acquisition transaction costs were
$5.0 million
during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
. Typically, acquisition transaction costs consist of legal fees, other professional fees, transfer taxes and other direct costs associated with our pursuit of hotel investments. As a result, these costs vary with our level of ongoing acquisition activity. The primary increase during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
was attributable to the three hotels acquired in July 2015.
Pre-opening expense
Pre-opening expenses were
$1.4 million
during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, which related to opening costs for our two joint venture development projects, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which opened to the public in August and October 2015, respectively.
Provision for asset impairment
During the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, a provision for asset impairment of
$5.4 million
was recorded on two hotels which were identified to have a reduction in their expected holding period and were written down to their estimated fair market values. These hotels were subsequently sold in August and December 2014. There were no asset impairments recorded for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
.
Separation and other start-up related expenses
The
$26.9 million
in separation and other start-up related expenses for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, relates to fees paid to unrelated third parties attributable to one-time costs incurred related to our spin-off from InvenTrust, the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, costs related to the Tender Offer and other start-up costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly-traded company.
Results of Non-Operating Income and Expenses
Non-operating income and expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
Increase / (Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Non-operating income and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Gain on sale of investment properties
|
$
|
43,015
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
$
|
42,322
|
|
6,107.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Other income
|
4,916
|
|
324
|
|
4,592
|
|
1,417.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(50,816
|
)
|
(57,427
|
)
|
6,611
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
(5,761
|
)
|
(1,713
|
)
|
(4,048
|
)
|
(236.3
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
|
—
|
|
4,216
|
|
(4,216
|
)
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(6,295
|
)
|
(5,865
|
)
|
(430
|
)
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
(489
|
)
|
75,120
|
|
(75,609
|
)
|
(100.7
|
)%
|
||||||
Gain on sale of investment properties
Gain on sale of investment properties for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
was related to the sale of three hotels in 2014 that were included in continuing operations. The gain on sale for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
related to the sale of the Hyatt Regency Orange County in October 2015.
Other income (expense)
Other income increased
$4.6 million
, or
1,417.3%
, for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, which was primarily attributable to the involuntary loss and business interruption insurance recovery income of $3.8 million, which is net of hotel related expenses.
Interest expense
Interest expense decreased
$6.6 million
, or
11.5%
, to
$50.8 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$57.4 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
. This was primarily the result of lower average debt balances in 2015 due to repayments during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, and the Company was no longer allocated the $96.0 million unsecured credit facility from InvenTrust.
66
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Loss on extinguishment of debt increased by
$4.0 million
, or
236.3%
, to
$5.8 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$1.7 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
. This was primarily the result of the prepayment penalties and other costs associated with the repayment of seven mortgage loans during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
.
Equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
Equity in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net decreased
$4.2 million
, or
100.0%
, for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
compared to the
year ended
December 31, 2014
. During the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, the Company bought out its partner's interest in an unconsolidated entity that owned one hotel property, and began consolidating the operating results of the hotel resulting in a gain of $4.5 million upon consolidation of the related assets and liabilities, which was offset by $0.3 million representing the Company's share of equity in losses prior to the buyout of the remaining partner's interest. The respective hotel property was later sold as part of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We had no investments in unconsolidated entities as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015
.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense increased
$0.4 million
, or
7.3%
, to
$6.3 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
from
$5.9 million
allocated from InvenTrust for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, which includes taxes on a one-time taxable gain of $1.9 million on the transfer of a hotel to a more optimal ownership structure in connection with the Company’s intention to elect to be taxed as a REIT.
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations decreased
$75.6 million
, or
100.7%
, for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
. During the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, there were 52 properties reflected in discontinued operations. Effective January 1, 2014, we elected to early adopt ASU 2014-08. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift that had (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations. On September 17, 2014, InvenTrust entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement to sell the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, which was sold on November 17, 2014. Prior to the sale transaction, we oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We believe this sale represented a strategic shift away from suburban select service hotels that had a major effect on our results and operations, and qualified as discontinued operations under ASU No. 2014-08. The operations of these hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
.
67
Comparison of the year ended
December 31, 2014
to the year ended
December 31, 2013
Operating information
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
Variance
|
|||
|
Number of properties at January 1
|
48
|
37
|
29.7%
|
||
|
Properties acquired
|
1
|
14
|
(92.9)%
|
||
|
Properties disposed
|
(3)
|
(3)
|
—%
|
||
|
Number of properties at December 31
|
46
|
48
|
(4.2)%
|
||
|
Number of rooms at January 1
|
12,472
|
9,492
|
31.4%
|
||
|
Rooms in properties acquired
|
645
|
3,303
|
(80.5)%
|
||
|
Rooms in properties disposed
|
(481)
|
(323)
|
48.9%
|
||
|
Number of rooms at December 31
|
12,636
|
12,472
|
1.3%
|
||
|
Portfolio Statistics:
|
|||||
|
Occupancy
(1)(2)
|
76.2%
|
73.6%
|
3.5%
|
||
|
Average Daily Rate (ADR)
(1)(2)
|
$176.80
|
$158.00
|
11.9%
|
||
|
Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR)
(1)(2)
|
$134.73
|
$116.23
|
15.9%
|
||
|
Hotel operating income (in thousands)
(3)
|
$333,363
|
$225,238
|
48.0%
|
||
|
(1)
|
For hotels acquired during the applicable period, only includes operating statistics since the date of acquisition. For hotels disposed of during the period, operating results and statistics are only included through the date of the respective disposition. Reflects a January 1 to December 31 fiscal calendar year for all hotels, including those operated by Marriott.
|
|
(2)
|
Does not include hotel statistics for hotel dispositions classified as discontinued operations.
|
|
(3)
|
Hotel operating income represents the difference between total revenues and total hotel operating expenses.
|
Revenues
Revenues consists of room, food and beverage, and other departmental revenues from our hotels, as follows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Room revenues
|
$
|
631,901
|
|
$
|
443,267
|
|
$
|
188,634
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|||
|
Food and beverage revenues
|
235,066
|
|
168,368
|
|
66,698
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other revenues
|
59,699
|
|
40,236
|
|
19,463
|
|
48.4
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
926,666
|
|
$
|
651,871
|
|
$
|
274,795
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
|||
Room revenues
Room revenues increased by
$188.6 million
, or
42.6%
, to
$631.9 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$443.3 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
, of which $160.9 million was contributed by the 14 hotels acquired during 2013, the one hotel acquired during 2014 and a net increase of $30.5 million was contributed by our remaining
31
comparable hotels. These increases were offset by a reduction in revenue of $2.8 million related to three properties disposed of in 2014. The strong overall demand levels generally allowed the
31
comparable hotel properties to reduce lower rated business while more aggressively targeting business segments that were more financially advantageous for their individual hotels. Several of our larger hotels with meeting space had success in the corporate group market, while other hotels experienced significant strength in the transient market. Business demand levels were sufficient to support higher occupancy in conjunction with the robust ADR growth.
Food and beverage revenues
Food and beverage revenues increased by
$66.7 million
, or
39.6%
, to
$235.1 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$168.4 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
, of which $53.1 million was contributed by the 14 hotels acquired
68
during 2013, the one hotel acquired during 2014 and a net increase of $14.3 million was contributed by our remaining
31
comparable hotels. These increases for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, were offset by decreases of $0.7 million related to three properties disposed of in 2014. The increase from our comparable properties is due primarily to higher banquet food and beverage, and ancillary revenues at these properties, as well as good performance in their other food and beverage outlets.
Other revenues
Other revenues increased by
$19.5 million
, or
48.4%
, to
$59.7 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$40.2 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
, of which $16.5 million was contributed by the 14 hotels acquired during 2013, the one hotel acquired during 2014 and a net increase of $3.0 million was contributed by our remaining
31
comparable hotels. The increase from our comparable properties is due primarily to increased ancillary sources such as tenant leases, parking, telephone and other guest services.
Hotel Operating Expenses
Hotel operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Hotel operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
|
Room expenses
|
$
|
140,128
|
|
$
|
96,444
|
|
$
|
43,684
|
|
45.3
|
%
|
|||
|
Food and beverage expenses
|
158,243
|
|
114,011
|
|
44,232
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other direct expenses
|
28,556
|
|
21,110
|
|
7,446
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Other indirect expenses
|
214,272
|
|
157,385
|
|
56,887
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Management fees
|
52,104
|
|
37,683
|
|
14,421
|
|
38.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Total hotel operating expenses
|
$
|
593,303
|
|
$
|
426,633
|
|
$
|
166,670
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
|||
Hotel operating expenses
Total hotel operating expenses increased
$166.7 million
, or
39.1%
, to
$593.3 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$426.6 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2013
, of which $145.1 million was contributed by the 14 hotels acquired during 2013, the one hotel acquired during 2014 and a net increase of $22.7 million was contributed by our remaining
31
comparable hotels. These increases were offset by a $2.6 million decrease in total hotel operating expenses attributable to the three hotels sold in 2014.
Corporate and Other Expenses
Corporate and other expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
141,807
|
|
$
|
104,229
|
|
$
|
37,578
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
|||
|
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance
|
44,625
|
|
29,763
|
|
14,862
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
||||||
|
Ground lease expense
|
5,541
|
|
1,923
|
|
3,618
|
|
188.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
38,895
|
|
13,445
|
|
25,450
|
|
189.3
|
%
|
||||||
|
Business management fees
|
1,474
|
|
12,743
|
|
(11,269
|
)
|
(88.4
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
1,192
|
|
2,275
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
(47.6
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Provision for asset impairments
|
5,378
|
|
49,145
|
|
(43,767
|
)
|
(89.1
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Total corporate and other expenses
|
$
|
238,912
|
|
$
|
213,523
|
|
$
|
25,389
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$37.6 million
, or
36.1%
, to
$141.8 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$104.2 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
, of which $40.9 million was contributed by the 14 hotels acquired during 2013 and the one hotel acquired during 2014. These increases were offset by decreases of $2.9 million for three properties sold in 2014.
69
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes, and insurance
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes, and insurance expense increased
$14.9 million
, or
49.9%
, to
$44.6 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$29.8 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. This increase was primarily a result of 14 hotels acquired during the year ended December 31, 2013, and one hotel acquired during the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, real estate and personal property taxes increased across the remaining portfolio due to increased assessed property values or tax rates at certain properties, offset by refunds from prior year real estate tax appeals.
Ground lease expense
Ground lease expense increased
$3.6 million
, or
188.1%
, to
$5.5 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$1.9 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2013
, comprised on an increase of $3.6 million primarily attributable to the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014 and a full year of expense attributable the
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara acquired in September 2013.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consisted primarily of compensation expense for our corporate staff and personnel supporting our business, contractual performance obligations, office administrative and related expenses and acquisition expenses. In addition, general and administrative expenses included an allocation of costs by InvenTrust for certain corporate services and other expenses. The allocation includes costs related to corporate overhead expenses, such as payroll costs for certain of InvenTrust's employees (accounting, finance, tax, treasury, and legal) and outside professional services.
General and administrative expense increased
$25.5 million
, or
189.3%
, to
$38.9 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$13.4 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. Costs incurred in 2014 included legal and other professional fees related to InvenTrust’s Self-Management Transactions on March 12, 2014, increased corporate staffing, and may have included costs related to our separation from InvenTrust and the preparation of the listing of our common stock on the NYSE.
Business management fee
Business management fee expense decreased
$11.3 million
, or
88.4%
, to
$1.5 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$12.7 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust executed the Self-Management Transactions. In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate the management agreement with the Business Manager, hire all of the Business Manager’s employees and acquire the assets or rights necessary to conduct the functions previously performed for InvenTrust by the Business Manager. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. As a result, we have not been allocated a business management fee after January 2014.
Acquisition transaction costs
Acquisition transaction costs decreased
$1.1 million
, or
47.6%
, to
$1.2 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$2.3 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. This decrease in acquisition transition costs was due to a decrease in the volume of acquisition activity during the year ended December 31, 2014.
Provision for asset impairment
During the years ended
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, a provision for asset impairment of
$5.4 million
and
$49.1 million
, respectively, was recorded on certain hotels that were identified to have a reduction in the expected holding period.
70
Results of Non-operating Income and Expenses
Hotel non-operating income and expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||
|
2014
|
2013
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||
|
Gain on sale of investment properties
|
$
|
693
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
—
|
%
|
|||
|
Other income (expense)
|
324
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
1,437
|
|
129.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Interest expense
|
(57,427
|
)
|
(52,792
|
)
|
(4,635
|
)
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
(1,713
|
)
|
—
|
|
(1,713
|
)
|
—
|
%
|
||||||
|
Equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
|
4,216
|
|
(33
|
)
|
4,249
|
|
12,875.8
|
%
|
||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(5,865
|
)
|
(3,619
|
)
|
2,246
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
||||||
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
75,120
|
|
(5,626
|
)
|
80,746
|
|
1,435.2
|
%
|
||||||
Other income (expense)
Other expense decreased
$1.4 million
, or
129.1%
, to other income of
$0.3 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, which was primarily attributable to the net settlement of contingent consideration payments related to 2013 acquisitions.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased
$4.6 million
, or
8.8%
, to
$57.4 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$52.8 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. The increase in interest expense was primarily the result of a net increase in debt to
$1,295 million
as of
December 31, 2014
from
$1,280 million
as of
December 31, 2013
, which included a full year of interest expense related to the $352 million in new financings entered into during 2013 and the addition of $123 million in new financings during 2014, which was offset by $115 million in debt extinguishments primarily in the fourth quarter of 2014 and a decrease in our weighted average interest rate from 4.7% in 2013 to
4.0%
in 2014.
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Loss on extinguishment of debt increased to
$1.7 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
. This was primarily the result of the prepayment penalties and other costs associated with the repayment of mortgage loans during the year.
Equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
Equity in earnings (loss) of investment in unconsolidated entities increased
$4.2 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from a loss of
$0.03 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. During the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, the Company bought out its partner's interest in an unconsolidated entity that owned one hotel property, and began consolidating the operating results of the hotel resulting in a gain of $4.5 million upon consolidation of the related assets and liabilities, which was offset by $0.3 million representing the Company's share of equity in losses prior to the buyout of the remaining partner's interest. The respective hotel property was later sold as part of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio in November 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized an other than temporary impairment in its equity investment of $1.0 million.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense increased
$2.2 million
to
$5.9 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from
$3.6 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. The increase was mainly due to one-time tax expenses related to organizational re-structuring of our TRS leases.
71
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations increased by
$80.7 million
to income of
$75.1 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
from a loss of
$5.6 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. During the
year ended
December 31, 2014
and 2013, there were 52 properties reflected in discontinued operations. Effective January 1, 2014, we elected to early adopt ASU 2014-08. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift that had (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations. On September 17, 2014, InvenTrust entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement to sell the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, which was sold on November 17, 2014. Prior to the sale transaction, we oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We believe this sale represented a strategic shift away from suburban select service hotels that had a major effect on our results and operations, and qualified as discontinued operations under ASU No. 2014-08. The operations of these hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, which resulted in net income of $75.1 million, including a gain on sale of $135.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We consider the following non-GAAP financial measures useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income or loss, operating profit, cash from operations, or any other operating performance measure as prescribed per GAAP.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA is a commonly used measure of performance in many industries and is defined as net income or loss (calculated in accordance with GAAP) excluding interest expense, provision for income taxes (including income taxes applicable to sale of assets) and depreciation and amortization. We consider EBITDA useful to an investor regarding our results of operations, in evaluating and facilitating comparisons of our operating performance between periods and between REITs by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results, even though EBITDA does not represent an amount that accrues directly to common stockholders. In addition, EBITDA is used as one measure in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions and along with FFO and Adjusted FFO, it is used by management in the annual budget process for compensation programs.
We further adjust EBITDA for certain additional items such as hotel property acquisitions and pursuit costs, amortization of share-based compensation, equity investment adjustments, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, impairment of real estate assets, operating results from properties sold and other costs we believe do not represent recurring operations and are not indicative of the performance of our underlying hotel property entities. We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides investors with another financial measure in evaluating and facilitating comparison of operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures.
FFO and Adjusted FFO
We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income or loss (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding real estate-related depreciation, amortization and impairments, gains (losses) from sales of real estate, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, and items classified by GAAP as extraordinary. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, most industry investors consider presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. We believe that the presentation of FFO provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our operating performance by excluding the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization, gains (losses) from sales for real estate, impairments of real estate assets, extraordinary items and the portion of these items related to unconsolidated entities, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and which may be of lesser significance in evaluating current performance. We believe that the presentation of FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between REITs, even though FFO does not represent an amount that accrues directly to common stockholders. Our calculation of FFO may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies who do not use the NAREIT definition of FFO or do not calculate FFO per diluted share in accordance with NAREIT guidance. Additionally, FFO may not be helpful when comparing us to non-REITs.
72
We further adjust FFO for certain additional items that are not in NAREIT’s definition of FFO such as hotel property acquisition and pursuit costs, amortization of debt origination costs and share-based compensation, operating results from properties that are sold and other expenses we believe do not represent recurring operations. We believe that Adjusted FFO provides investors with useful supplemental information that may facilitate comparisons of ongoing operating performance between periods and between REITs that make similar adjustments to FFO and is beneficial to investors’ complete understanding of our operating performance.
73
The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
(in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to the Company
|
$
|
88,758
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
|
Adjustments:
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
50,816
|
|
57,427
|
|
52,792
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense from unconsolidated entity
|
—
|
|
31
|
|
311
|
|
|||||
|
Interest expense from discontinued operations
(1)
|
—
|
|
28,299
|
|
32,744
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense
|
6,295
|
|
5,865
|
|
3,619
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit) related to discontinued operations
(1)
|
—
|
|
4,566
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization related to investment properties
|
148,009
|
|
141,807
|
|
104,229
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization related to investment in unconsolidated entity
|
—
|
|
100
|
|
821
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization of discontinued operations
(1)
|
—
|
|
35,864
|
|
50,634
|
|
|||||
|
Adjustments related to non-controlling interests
|
(270
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
EBITDA
|
$
|
293,608
|
|
$
|
383,758
|
|
$
|
193,269
|
|
||
|
Reconciliation to Adjusted EBITDA
|
|||||||||||
|
Impairment of investment properties
|
—
|
|
5,378
|
|
49,145
|
|
|||||
|
Impairment on investment in unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,003
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of investment property
|
(43,015
|
)
|
(693
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of investment property related to discontinued operations
(1)
|
(22
|
)
|
(135,692
|
)
|
(1,564
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
5,761
|
|
1,713
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt related to discontinued operations
(1)
|
—
|
|
65,391
|
|
20
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on consolidation of investment in unconsolidated entity
|
—
|
|
(4,509
|
)
|
(487
|
)
|
|||||
|
Acquisition and pursuit costs
|
5,046
|
|
1,192
|
|
2,275
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of share-based compensation expense
|
6,102
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of above and below market ground leases
|
380
|
|
265
|
|
68
|
|
|||||
|
Pre-opening expenses
(2)
|
1,411
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Adjustments related to non-controlling interests
|
(353
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Management termination fees net of guaranty income
(3)
|
212
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Business interruption insurance recoveries, net
(4)
|
(3,884
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
EBITDA adjustment for three hotels sold in 2014
(5)
|
(85
|
)
|
(1,690
|
)
|
(2,436
|
)
|
|||||
|
EBITDA adjustment for Suburban Select Service Portfolio
(1)
|
489
|
|
(73,765
|
)
|
(75,817
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other non-recurring expenses
(6)
|
26,887
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
292,537
|
|
$
|
241,348
|
|
$
|
165,476
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
On November 17, 2014, InvenTrust sold the Suburban Select Service Portfolio for an aggregate gross disposition price of $1.1 billion. Prior to the sale transaction, the Company oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. This sale reflected a strategic shift and had a major impact on our combined consolidated financial statements; therefore the operations of these 52 hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and 2014.
|
|
(2)
|
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, the pre-opening expenses related to the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which opened in August and October 2015, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, we terminated management agreements for four properties and entered into new management contracts with a new third-party hotel operator. In connection with the terminations, we paid termination fees of $0.7 million, which was offset by $0.5 million in income from the write off of deferred guaranty payments that were previously received from certain of the managers and were being recognized over the term of the old management contracts.
|
|
(4)
|
The business interruption insurance recovery for 2014 received during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
was $
3.9 million
, which is net of $1.8 million of hotel related expenses attributable to those hotels impacted by the August 2014 Napa Earthquake.
|
|
(5)
|
The following three hotels were disposed of in 2014 prior to the Company's separation from its former parent: Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center, DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria, and Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands.
|
|
(6)
|
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, other non-recurring expenses include one-time costs related to the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, such as legal and other professional fees, costs related to the Tender Offer described in Note 12 in the combined consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2015
and 2014, and other start-up costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. The year ended
December 31, 2014
included costs related to our separation from InvenTrust and costs related to the preparation of the listing of our common stock on the NYSE.
|
74
The following is a reconciliation of our GAAP net income to FFO and Adjusted FFO for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
, and
2013
(in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to the Company
|
$
|
88,758
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
|
Adjustments:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization related to investment properties
|
148,009
|
|
141,807
|
|
104,229
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization related to investment in unconsolidated entity
|
—
|
|
100
|
|
821
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation and amortization of discontinued operations
(1)
|
—
|
|
35,864
|
|
50,634
|
|
|||||
|
Impairment of investment property
|
—
|
|
5,378
|
|
49,145
|
|
|||||
|
Impairment of investment in unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,004
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of investment property
|
(43,015
|
)
|
(693
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of investment property related to discontinued operations
(1)
|
(22
|
)
|
(135,692
|
)
|
(1,564
|
)
|
|||||
|
Gain on consolidation of investment in unconsolidated entity
|
—
|
|
(4,509
|
)
|
(487
|
)
|
|||||
|
Adjustments related to non-controlling interests
|
(197
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
FFO
|
$
|
193,533
|
|
$
|
152,054
|
|
$
|
152,314
|
|
||
|
Distribution to preferred shareholders
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
FFO available to common share and unit holders
|
$
|
193,521
|
|
$
|
152,054
|
|
$
|
152,314
|
|
||
|
Reconciliation to Adjusted FFO
|
|||||||||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
$
|
5,761
|
|
$
|
1,713
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt related to discontinued operations
(1)
|
—
|
|
65,391
|
|
20
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition and pursuit costs
|
5,046
|
|
1,192
|
|
2,275
|
|
|||||
|
Loan related costs
(2)
|
3,778
|
|
4,462
|
|
4,403
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of share-based compensation expense
|
6,102
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of above and below market ground leases
|
380
|
|
265
|
|
68
|
|
|||||
|
Pre-opening expenses
|
1,411
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Adjustments related to non-controlling interests
|
(356
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Management termination fees net of guaranty income
(3)
|
212
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Income tax related to restructuring
(4)
|
1,900
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Business interruption proceeds net of hotel related expenses
(5)
|
(3,884
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
FFO adjustment for three hotels sold in 2014
(6)
|
(85
|
)
|
(1,442
|
)
|
(1,753
|
)
|
|||||
|
FFO adjustment for Suburban Select Service Portfolio
(1)
|
489
|
|
(40,903
|
)
|
(45,664
|
)
|
|||||
|
Other non-recurring expenses
(7)
|
26,887
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted FFO
|
$
|
241,162
|
|
$
|
182,732
|
|
$
|
111,663
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
On November 17, 2014, InvenTrust sold the Suburban Select Service Portfolio for an aggregate gross disposition price of $1.1 billion. Prior to the sale transaction, the Company oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. This sale reflected a strategic shift and had a major impact on our combined consolidated financial statements; therefore the operations of these 52 hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and 2014.
|
|
(2)
|
Loan related costs included amortization of debt discounts, premiums and deferred loan origination costs.
|
|
(3)
|
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, we terminated management agreements for four properties and entered into new management contracts with a new third-party hotel operator. In connection with the terminations, we paid termination fees of $0.7 million, which was offset by $0.5 million in income from the write off of deferred guaranty payments that were previously received from certain of the managers and were being recognized over the term of the old management contracts.
|
|
(4)
|
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, the Company recognized income tax expense of
$6.3
million, of which $1.9 million related to a gain on the transfer of a hotel between legal entities resulting in a more optimal structure in connection with the Company’s intention to elect to be taxed as a REIT.
|
|
(5)
|
The business interruption insurance recovery for 2014 received during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
was $3.9 million, which is net of $1.8 million of hotel related expenses attributable to those hotels impacted by the August 2014 Napa Earthquake.
|
|
(6)
|
The following three hotels were disposed of in 2014 prior to the Company's separation from its former parent: Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center, DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria, and Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands.
|
|
(7)
|
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, other non-recurring expenses include one-time costs related to the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, such as legal and other professional fees, costs related to the Tender Offer described in Note 12 in the combined consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2015
and 2014, and other start-up costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. The year ended
December 31, 2014
included costs related to our separation from InvenTrust and costs related to the preparation of the listing of our common stock on the NYSE.
|
75
Use and Limitations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO, and Adjusted FFO do not represent cash generated from operating activities under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss, operating profit, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. Although we present and use EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO because we believe they are useful to investors in evaluating and facilitating comparisons of our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures, the use of these non-GAAP measures has certain limitations as analytical tools. These non-GAAP financial measures are not measures of our liquidity, nor are they indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to fund capital expenditures, contractual commitments, working capital, service debt or make cash distributions. These measurements do not reflect cash expenditures for long-term assets and other items that we have incurred and will incur. These non-GAAP financial measures may include funds that may not be available for management’s discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures, property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties. These non-GAAP financial measures as presented may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures as calculated by other real estate companies.
We compensate for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures, and our combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, include interest expense, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect additional ways of viewing our operations that we believe, when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. We strongly encourage investors to review our financial information in its entirety and not to rely on a single financial measure.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements from cash on hand, cash flow from operations, borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and the ability to refinance or extend our maturing debt as it becomes due. The objectives of our cash management policy are to maintain the availability of liquidity and minimize operational costs. Further, we have an investment policy that is focused on the preservation of capital and maximizing the return on new and existing investments.
On a long term basis, our objectives are to maximize revenue and profits generated by our existing properties and acquired hotels, to further enhance the value of our portfolio and produce an attractive current yield, as well as, to generate sustainable and predictable cash flow from our operations to distribute to our stockholders. To the extent we are able to successfully improve the performance of our portfolio, we believe this will result in increased operating cash flows. Additionally, we may meet our long-term liquidity requirements through additional borrowings, the issuance of equity and debt securities, and/or proceeds from the sales of hotels.
We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase additional amounts of our outstanding equity through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plans. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Repurchase Program pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program.
As of
December 31, 2015
, we had
$122.2 million
of consolidated cash and cash equivalents and
$77.3 million
of restricted cash and escrows. The restricted cash as of
December 31, 2015
primarily consists of cash held in restricted escrows of $7.4 million for real estate taxes and insurance, and
$69.9 million
related to lodging furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves as required per the terms of our management and franchise agreements.
Credit facility
Effective February 3, 2015, we entered into a $400 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks. The revolving credit facility includes an uncommitted accordion feature which, subject to certain conditions, allows us to increase the aggregate availability by up to an additional $350 million. As of
December 31, 2015
, we did not have any outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility.
76
Interest is paid on the periodic advances under the unsecured revolving credit facility at varying rates, based upon either LIBOR or the alternate base rate, plus an additional margin amount. The interest rate depends upon our leverage ratio pursuant to the provisions of the credit facility agreement. Our credit facility requires an unused commitment fee of 0.30% on the unused portion of the available borrowing amount, which totaled approximately
$1.0 million
for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
. The facility also contains customary covenants and restrictions for similar type facilities and, as of
December 31, 2015
, we were in compliance with these requirements.
Unsecured Term Loans and Hotel Mortgages
In October 2015, the Company executed a
$175 million
unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in February 2021. Simultaneously with the closing of the
$175 million
unsecured term loan, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at
1.29%
for the entire term of the loan. A portion of the proceeds from the
$175 million
unsecured term loan was used to pay off the outstanding balance on the unsecured revolving credit facility and the remaining proceeds were used to pay off
one
property level mortgage with a principal balance of
$53 million
.
Additionally in October 2015, the Company executed a
$125 million
unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in October 2022. In December 2015, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at
1.83%
for the entire term of the loan. The
$125 million
unsecured term loan was funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid off hotel mortgage debt totaling
$300.9 million
. As of December 31, 2015, the remaining hotel level mortgage debt was $
956.3 million
and had a weighted average interest rate of
3.65%
.
77
Borrowings
Debt as of
December 31, 2015
and December 31,
2014
consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
Balance Outstanding as of
|
||||||||||||
|
Rate Type
(1)
|
Rate
|
Maturity Date
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||||
|
Mortgage Loans
|
||||||||||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown
|
Fixed
|
5.45
|
%
|
11/11/2015
|
—
|
|
55,859
|
|
||||
|
Andaz San Diego
|
Variable
|
3.67
|
%
|
3/1/2016
|
—
|
|
26,315
|
|
||||
|
Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa
|
Variable
|
2.74
|
%
|
3/23/2016
|
34,374
|
|
35,091
|
|
||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Chicago North Shore/Evanston
|
Fixed
|
5.94
|
%
|
6/1/2016
|
—
|
|
18,777
|
|
||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando
|
Fixed
|
5.82
|
%
|
10/1/2016
|
49,360
|
|
50,298
|
|
||||
|
Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center
|
Fixed
|
4.50
|
%
|
12/1/2016
|
—
|
|
74,049
|
|
||||
|
Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center
|
Fixed
|
5.50
|
%
|
12/6/2016
|
97,000
|
|
97,000
|
|
||||
|
Renaissance Austin Hotel
|
Fixed
|
5.51
|
%
|
12/8/2016
|
83,000
|
|
83,000
|
|
||||
|
Hyatt Regency Orange County
(2)
|
Fixed
|
5.25
|
%
|
1/3/2017
|
—
|
|
63,035
|
|
||||
|
Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown
|
Fixed
|
4.00
|
%
|
3/1/2017
|
22,607
|
|
23,261
|
|
||||
|
Hampton Inn & Suites Denver Downtown
|
Fixed
|
5.25
|
%
|
3/1/2017
|
—
|
|
13,625
|
|
||||
|
Marriott San Francisco Airport Waterfront
|
Fixed
|
5.40
|
%
|
4/1/2017
|
—
|
|
53,585
|
|
||||
|
Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB
|
Fixed
|
5.25
|
%
|
4/1/2017
|
13,353
|
|
13,650
|
|
||||
|
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville
(3)
|
Fixed
|
6.46
|
%
|
2/1/2018
|
27,775
|
|
27,775
|
|
||||
|
Fairmont Dallas
|
Variable
|
2.29
|
%
|
4/10/2018
|
56,217
|
|
56,892
|
|
||||
|
Residence Inn Denver City Center
|
Variable
|
2.66
|
%
|
4/17/2018
|
45,210
|
|
45,210
|
|
||||
|
Marriott Dallas City Center
|
Variable
|
2.66
|
%
|
5/24/2018
|
40,090
|
|
40,090
|
|
||||
|
Bohemian Hotel Savannah Riverfront
|
Variable
|
2.76
|
%
|
12/17/2018
|
27,480
|
|
27,480
|
|
||||
|
Andaz Savannah
|
Variable
|
2.24
|
%
|
1/14/2019
|
21,500
|
|
21,500
|
|
||||
|
Hotel Monaco Denver
|
Variable
|
2.34
|
%
|
1/17/2019
|
41,000
|
|
41,000
|
|
||||
|
Hotel Monaco Chicago
|
Variable
|
2.59
|
%
|
1/17/2019
|
26,000
|
|
26,000
|
|
||||
|
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara
|
Variable
|
2.41
|
%
|
1/20/2019
|
60,200
|
|
60,200
|
|
||||
|
Loews New Orleans Hotel
|
Variable
|
2.62
|
%
|
2/22/2019
|
37,500
|
|
37,500
|
|
||||
|
Andaz Napa
(4)
|
Variable
|
2.34
|
%
|
3/21/2019
|
38,000
|
|
30,500
|
|
||||
|
Westin Galleria & Oaks Houston
|
Variable
|
2.92
|
%
|
(5)
|
5/1/2019
|
110,000
|
|
110,000
|
|
|||
|
Marriott Charleston Town Center
|
Fixed
|
3.85
|
%
|
7/1/2020
|
16,877
|
|
17,108
|
|
||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston (JV)
|
Variable
|
2.82
|
%
|
11/10/2020
|
19,950
|
|
11,119
|
|
||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook (JV)
|
Variable
|
2.92
|
%
|
12/27/2020
|
25,784
|
|
10,095
|
|
||||
|
Residence Inn Boston Cambridge
(6)
|
Fixed
|
4.48
|
%
|
10/28/2025
|
63,000
|
|
30,674
|
|
||||
|
Total Mortgage Loans
|
3.65
|
%
|
(7)
|
956,277
|
|
1,200,688
|
|
|||||
|
Mortgage Loan Premium / (Discounts)
(8)
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
(661
|
)
|
(1,660
|
)
|
||||
|
Unamortized loan costs
(9)
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
(8,305
|
)
|
(6,674
|
)
|
||||
|
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility
|
Variable
|
2.04
|
%
|
2/3/2019
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Term Loan $175M
|
Hedged
|
2.79
|
%
|
2/15/2021
|
175,000
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Term Loan $125M
(10)
|
Hedged
|
3.63
|
%
|
10/22/2022
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Line of Credit Allocation
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
|
96,020
|
|
||||
|
Total Debt
(11)
|
3.51
|
%
|
(7)
|
1,122,311
|
|
1,288,374
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Floating index is one month LIBOR.
|
|
(2)
|
Loan balance was repaid with proceeds from the sale of the hotel property in October 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
The hotel was sold in February 2016, and the related debt was paid off with proceeds from the sale.
|
78
|
(4)
|
Obtained incremental proceeds under terms of the mortgage of
$7.5 million
in November 2015.
|
|
(5)
|
The Company modified the terms of the loan in December 2015 to lower the interest rate spread over LIBOR from
3.15%
to 2.50% and to extend the prepayment provision.
|
|
(6)
|
In October 2015, Company refinanced the mortgage with a new loan bearing a
4.48%
fixed interest rate and October 2025 maturity. Additional proceeds of
$33 million
were received under the refinanced terms of the mortgage.
|
|
(7)
|
Weighted average interest rate as of
December 31, 2015
.
|
|
(8)
|
Loan premiums/(discounts) on assumed mortgages recorded in purchase accounting.
|
|
(9)
|
See Note 2 in the combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report for further discussion on the adoption of ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.
|
|
(10)
|
Funded
$125 million
in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth.
|
|
(11)
|
Includes the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville mortgage of
$27.8 million
that is included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale on the combined consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.
|
Share Repurchase Program
In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Repurchase Program pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program.
From January 1, 2016 through
March 1, 2016
, the Company repurchased
2,813,292
shares of common stock at a weighted average price of
$14.27
per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$40.2 million
. As of
March 1, 2016
, the Company had approximately
$59.8 million
remaining under its share repurchase authorization.
Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds
We maintain each of our properties in good repair and condition and in conformity with applicable laws and regulations, franchise agreements and management agreements. Routine capital expenditures are administered by the property management companies. However, we have approval rights over the capital expenditures as part of the annual budget process for each of our properties. From time to time, certain of our hotels may be undergoing renovations as a result of our decision to upgrade portions of the hotels, such as guest rooms, public space, meeting space and/or restaurants, in order to better compete with other hotels in our markets. In addition, upon the acquisition of a hotel we often are required to complete a property improvement plan in order to bring the hotel up to the respective brand standards. If permitted by the terms of the management agreement, funding for a renovation will first come from the furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves. We are obligated to maintain reserve funds with respect to certain agreements with our hotel management companies, franchisors and lenders to provide funds, generally 3% to 5% of hotel revenues, sufficient to cover the cost of certain capital improvements to the hotels and to periodically replace and update furniture, fixtures and equipment. Certain of the agreements require that we reserve this cash in separate accounts. To the extent that the furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves are not available or adequate to cover the cost of the renovation, we may fund a portion of the renovation with cash on hand, borrowings from our unsecured revolving credit facility and/or other sources of available liquidity. As of
December 31, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
, we held a total of
$69.9 million
and
$76.3 million
, respectively, of furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves. We have been and will continue to be prudent with respect to our capital spending, taking into account our cash flows from operations.
During the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, we made cash payments totaling
$53.8 million
for capital expenditures, including $3.0 million for Napa hotel earthquake repairs. Our total capital expenditures in 2014 were $47.3 million, including $7.1 million for Napa earthquake repairs.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash are cash flows from operations and borrowings under debt financings including draws on our revolving credit facility. We may also obtain cash in the future from various types of equity offerings or the sale of our hotels. Our principal uses of cash are asset acquisitions, capital investments, routine debt service and debt repayments, operating costs, corporate expenses and dividends. We may also elect to use cash to buy back our common stock in the future under the Repurchase Program.
79
Comparison of the
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
to the
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
The table below presents summary cash flow information for the combined consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
|
$
|
193,152
|
|
$
|
181,605
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(216,671
|
)
|
827,513
|
|
|||
|
Net cash flows used in financing activities
|
(17,380
|
)
|
(935,234
|
)
|
|||
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(40,899
|
)
|
73,884
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
163,053
|
|
89,169
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
$
|
122,154
|
|
$
|
163,053
|
|
|
Operating
|
•
|
Cash provided by operating activities was
$193.2
million and
$181.6 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
increased due to cash flows from our hotel portfolio including cash flows generated by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in 2014 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015, which were offset by a (i) non-recurring general and administrative expenses of $
26.9 million
for one-time costs related to the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, such as legal and other professional fees, costs related to the Tender Offer and costs related to becoming a stand-alone public company and (ii) lost operating cash flows of $49.4 million from the sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio.
|
Investing
|
•
|
Cash used in investing activities was
$216.7
million and cash provided by investing activities was
$827.5 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
and
2014
, respectively. Cash used in investing activities for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
was primarily due to (i)
$53.8 million
paid for capital improvements at our hotel properties (ii)
$36.1 million
of additional investments in our properties that were under development, and
(iii) the acquisition of three hotels for $245 million which were offset by
$133.4 million
in proceeds received from the sale of the Hyatt Regency Orange County hotel in October 2015
. Cash provided by investing activities during the
year ended
December 31, 2014
was primarily attributable to the
$1.1 billion
in proceeds received from the sale of the Suburban Select Portfolio, which was offset by (i) the purchase of the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel for $183.8 million in February 2014, (ii)
$47.3 million
in capital improvements of our hotels and (iii)
$27.0 million
of additional investments in our properties that were under development.
|
Financing
|
•
|
Cash used in financing activities was
$17.4
million and
$935.2 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
and
2014
, respectively. Cash provided by financing activities for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
was primarily comprised of (i) a net contribution of
$153.3 million
from InvenTrust, (ii) net borrowings on our revolving line of credit of
$127.0 million
offset by repayments of
$127.0 million
, (iii) proceeds from mortgage debt and construction loan draws of
$64.7 million
, (iv) term loan proceeds of
$175.0 million
, and (iv)
$10.2 million
in contributions from non-controlling interests related to our joint venture partner's share of the total development cost. These proceeds were offset by (i) cash used for mortgage principal payments of
$8.2 million
, (ii) the payoff of
$300.9 million
in mortgage loans, (iii)
$36.9 million
used to repurchase common shares in the Tender Offer, and (iv)
the payment of
$67.7 million
in dividends to common stockholders
. Cash provided by financing activities for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, was primarily due to a net contribution of
$389.3 million
from InvenTrust and proceeds from mortgage debt and notes payable of
$122.9 million
, partially offset by principal payments of
$12.1 million
as well as payoffs of mortgages of
$648.9 million
.
|
80
Contractual Obligations
The table below presents, on a combined consolidated basis, obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations (including interest) and lease agreements as of
December 31, 2015
(in thousands):
|
Payments due by period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Debt Maturities
(1)
|
1,329,094
|
|
307,107
|
|
289,129
|
|
422,763
|
|
310,095
|
|
|||||||||
|
Ground Leases
|
125,910
|
|
3,276
|
|
6,552
|
|
6,552
|
|
109,530
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,455,004
|
|
$
|
310,383
|
|
$
|
295,681
|
|
$
|
429,315
|
|
$
|
419,625
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Includes principal and interest payments, for both variable and fixed rate loans. The variable rate interest payments were calculated based upon the variable rate spread plus 1 month LIBOR as of
December 31, 2015
.
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
December 31, 2015
, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes. We may enter into derivative instruments including interest rate swaps, caps and collars to manage or hedge interest rate risk. Derivative instruments are subject to fair value reporting at each reporting date and the increase or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss) or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We anticipate that our interest rate hedges will be highly effective because the terms of the derivative instruments exactly match the terms of the related hedged debt agreements. As such, the pending changes in the fair value of these derivatives are expected to be reflected in other comprehensive income (loss) in our combined consolidated financial statements. Derivatives expose the Company to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties under the terms of the interest rate hedge agreements. The Company believes it minimizes the credit risk by transacting with major creditworthy financial institutions.
In October 2015, the Company executed a
$175 million
unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in February 2021. Simultaneously with the closing of the
$175 million
unsecured term loan, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at
1.29%
for the entire term of the loan.
Additionally in October 2015, the Company executed a
$125 million
unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in October 2022. In December 2015, the Company entered into various forward starting swap agreements to fix LIBOR at 1.83% for the entire term of the loan. The
$125 million
unsecured term loan was funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth.
We have designated these pay-fixed, receive-floating interest rate swap derivatives as cash flow hedges. For the year ended
December 31, 2015
, there was
$1.5 million
in unrealized gain recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Inflation
We rely on the performance of the hotels to increase revenues to keep pace with inflation. Generally, our hotel operators possess the ability to adjust room rates daily, except for group or corporate rates contractually committed to in advance, although competitive pressures may limit the ability of our operators to raise rates faster than inflation or even at the same rate.
Seasonality
Demand in the lodging industry is affected by recurring seasonal patterns which are greatly influenced by overall economic cycles, the geographic locations of the hotels and the customer mix at the hotels. Generally, our hotels will have lower revenue, operating income and cash flow in the first quarter and higher revenue, operating income and cash flow in the second quarter.
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
See Note 2 to the accompanying combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report for additional information related to recently issued accounting pronouncements.
81
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We are subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates both in terms of variable-rate debt and the price of new fixed-rate debt upon maturity of existing debt and for acquisitions. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. If market rates of interest on all of the variable rate debt as of
December 31, 2015
permanently increased or decreased by 1%, the increase or decrease in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease or increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately
$5.8 million
per annum. If market rates of interest on all of the variable rate debt as of
December 31, 2014
permanently increased or decreased by 1%, the increase or decrease in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease or increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately
$5.8 million
per annum.
With regard to our variable rate financing, we assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both of our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows.
We monitor interest rate risk using a variety of techniques, including periodically evaluating fixed interest rate quotes on all variable rate debt and the costs associated with converting the debt to fixed rate debt. Also, existing fixed and variable rate loans that are scheduled to mature in the next year or two are evaluated for possible early refinancing or extension due to consideration given to current interest rates. We have taken significant steps in reducing our variable rate debt exposure by paying off property-level mortgage debt and entering into various interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest rate exposure risk related to our $175 million and $125 million unsecured terms loans. Refer to Note
8
in the combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report, for our mortgage debt principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year and expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes. Refer to Note
9
in the combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report for more information on our interest rate swap derivatives.
We may continue to use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our properties. To the extent we do, we are exposed to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. We maintain credit policies with regard to our counterparties that we believe reduce overall credit risk. These policies include evaluating and monitoring our counterparties' financial condition, including their credit ratings, and entering into agreements with counterparties based on established credit limit policies. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.
The following table provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations outstanding as of
December 31, 2015
, the following table presents principal repayments and related weighted-average interest rates by contractual maturity dates (in thousands):
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
(2)
|
2019
|
2020
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
|||||||
|
Maturing debt
(1)
:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed rate debt (mortgages and term loan)
(3)
|
$229,360
|
$35,959
|
$27,775
|
—
|
$16,877
|
238,000
|
$547,971
|
||||||
|
Variable rate debt (mortgage loans)
|
$34,374
|
—
|
$168,997
|
$334,200
|
$45,735
|
—
|
$583,306
|
||||||
|
Unsecured credit facility
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
|
Total
|
$263,734
|
$35,959
|
$196,772
|
$334,200
|
$62,612
|
$238,000
|
$1,131,277
|
||||||
|
Weighted average interest rate on debt:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed rate debt (mortgages and term loan)
|
5.57%
|
4.46%
|
6.46%
|
—
|
3.85%
|
3.24%
|
4.48%
|
||||||
|
Variable rate debt (mortgage loans)
|
2.74%
|
—
|
2.55%
|
2.59%
|
2.87%
|
—
|
2.61%
|
||||||
|
Unsecured credit facility
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
82
|
(1)
|
The debt maturity excludes net mortgage premiums and discounts of
$0.7 million
and unamortized loan costs of
$8.3 million
as of
December 31, 2015
.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville hotel mortgage of $27.8 million that is included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale on the combined consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2015
. The hotel was sold in February 2016, and the related debt was paid off with proceeds from the sale.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes all fixed rate debt, and all variable rate debt that was swapped to fixed rates as of
December 31, 2015
.
|
83
See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1.
None.
Evaluation of Disclosure on Controls and Procedures
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer evaluated as of
December 31, 2015
, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of
December 31, 2015
, were effective for the purpose of ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in this Annual Report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and our principal financial officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended). The Company's internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and Board of Directors regarding the fair representation of published financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on management's assessment, the Company maintained, in all material respect, effective internal controls over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2015
using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in "Internal Control Integrated Framework" (2013).
Pursuant to the rules established by the Securities and Exchange Commission, this Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of ended December 31,
2015
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
84
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our
2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our
2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Except as set forth below, the information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our
2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan
The following table sets forth information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plan, which includes the 2014 Share Unit Plan and 2015 Incentive Award Plan as of
December 31, 2015
:
|
(a)
|
(c)
|
|||||
|
Plan Category
|
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(1)
|
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
(2)
|
||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
|
||||||
|
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan
(3)
|
342,219
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR Holding, Inc. and XHR LP 2015 Incentive Award Plan
|
582,750
|
|
6,417,250
|
|
||
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||
|
(1)
|
Represents (i) 342,219 shares underlying awards of "annual share units" and "contingency share units" outstanding under the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan (the "Share Unit Plan"), and (ii) 84,701 shares underlying awards of restricted stock units and 498,049 LTIP Units (as defined in the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR Holding, Inc. and XHR LP 2015 Incentive Award Plan (the "2015 Incentive Award Plan")) outstanding under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, in each case, as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes shares of common stock available for future grants under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
On January 9, 2015, in connection with our separation from InvenTrust, the Share Unit Plan was terminated. No new share unit awards will be made under the Share Unit Plan, and the Share Unit Plan will continue to be maintained only with respect to awards outstanding as of the termination of the Share Unit Plan.
|
See Note
14
to the accompanying combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report for additional information regarding these compensation plans.
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our
2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our
2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
85
|
(a)
|
List of documents filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
|
|
1)
|
Financial Statements.
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The combined consolidated financial statements of the Company are set forth under "Part II-Item 8.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
2)
|
Financial Statement Schedules. The following financial statement schedule is filed herein on pages F-40 through F-44:
|
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the combined consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
|
3)
|
Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed (or incorporated by reference herein) as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
86
|
Exhibit Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
2.1
|
Separation and Distribution Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. (n/k/a InvenTrust Properties Corp.) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of January 20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on January 23, 2015)
|
|
|
3.1
|
Articles of Restatement of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., as filed on November 10, 2015 with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015)
|
|
|
3.2
|
Articles Supplementary of Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc., as filed on November 10, 2015 with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation ((incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015)
|
|
|
3.3
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.1
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of XHR LP, dated as of November 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015)
|
|
|
10.2
|
Revolving Credit Agreement by and among XHR LP, a syndicate of bank lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.3
|
Parent Guaranty by Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.4
|
Subsidiary Guaranty by certain subsidiaries of XHR LP for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of bank lenders, dated as of February 3, 2015
|
|
|
10.5
|
Employee Matters Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.6
|
Transition Services Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.7
|
Indemnity Agreement, dated August 8, 2014, between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on October 9, 2014)
|
|
|
10.8
|
First Amendment to Indemnity Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.9+
|
The Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 25, 2014)
|
|
|
10.10+
|
Form of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Share Unit Award Agreement (Annual Award) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 25, 2014)
|
|
|
10.11+
|
Form of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Share Unit Award Agreement (Contingency) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 25, 2014)
|
|
|
10.12+
|
Form of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Share Unit Award Agreement (Transaction) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 25, 2014)
|
|
87
|
10.13+
|
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR Holding, Inc. and XHR LP 2015 Incentive Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on January 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.14+
|
Form of Stock Payment Award Grant Notice and Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.15+
|
Form of Class A Performance LTIP Unit Agreement (2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 7, 2015)
|
|
|
10.16+
|
Form of Time-Based LTIP Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 7, 2015)
|
|
|
10.17+
|
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Director Compensation Program, as Amended and Restated, dated as of September 17, 2015(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015)
|
|
|
10.18+
|
Form of LTIP Unit Agreement (Non-Employee Directors)
|
|
|
10.19+
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on January 9, 2015)
|
|
|
10.20+
|
Form of Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 7, 2015)
|
|
|
21.1*
|
Subsidiaries of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
|
|
|
23.1*
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
|
31.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
31.2*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
32.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
*
Filed herewith
+ Management contract or compensatory plan
88
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
|
|
/s/ MARCEL VERBAAS
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Marcel Verbaas
|
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
Signature
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ MARCEL VERBAAS
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Marcel Verbaas
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ ANDREW J. WELCH
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Andrew J. Welch
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ JEFFREY H. DONAHUE
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Jeffrey H. Donahue
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ JOHN H. ALSCHULER, JR.
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
John H. Alschuler, Jr.
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ KEITH E. BASS
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Keith E. Bass
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ THOMAS M. GARTLAND
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Thomas M. Gartland
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ BEVERLY K. GOULET
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Beverly K. Goulet
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ DENNIS D. OKLAK
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Dennis D. Oklak
|
|
||||
|
By:
|
/s/ MARY ELIZABETH McCORMICK
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2016
|
||
|
Name:
|
Mary Elizabeth McCormick
|
|
||||
89
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Index to Financial Statements
|
Page
|
|||
|
Financial Statements
|
|||
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-
2
|
||
|
Combined Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
|
F-
3
|
||
|
Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
|
F-
4
|
||
|
Combined Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
|
F-
6
|
||
|
Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
|
F-
7
|
||
|
Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-
9
|
||
|
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2015
|
F-
40
|
||
F-
1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying combined consolidated balance sheets of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, and the related combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended
December 31, 2015
. In connection with our audits of the combined consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule III. These combined consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule III are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule III based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended
December 31, 2015
, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule III, when considered in relation to the basic combined consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth herein.
As discussed in note 2 to the combined consolidated financial statements, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. changed its method for accounting for discontinued operations in 2014 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08,
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity
.
/s/ KPMG LLP
March 10, 2016
Orlando, Florida
Certified Public Accountants
F-
2
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
As of
December 31,
2015
and
2014
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||
|
Investment properties:
|
|||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
374,698
|
|
$
|
319,624
|
|
|
|
Building and other improvements
|
2,847,122
|
|
2,532,782
|
|
|||
|
Construction in progress
|
169
|
|
39,736
|
|
|||
|
Total
|
$
|
3,221,989
|
|
$
|
2,892,142
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(580,285
|
)
|
(442,882
|
)
|
|||
|
Net investment properties
|
$
|
2,641,704
|
|
$
|
2,449,260
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
122,154
|
|
163,053
|
|
|||
|
Restricted cash and escrows
|
77,292
|
|
86,991
|
|
|||
|
Accounts and rents receivable, net of allowance of $243 and $251, respectively
|
24,368
|
|
24,022
|
|
|||
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
60,515
|
|
64,541
|
|
|||
|
Deferred tax asset
|
2,304
|
|
2,393
|
|
|||
|
Other assets
|
42,156
|
|
21,205
|
|
|||
|
Assets held for sale
|
35,452
|
|
137,611
|
|
|||
|
Total assets (including $77,140 and $41,054, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities)
|
$
|
3,005,945
|
|
$
|
2,949,076
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|||||||
|
Debt
|
$
|
1,094,536
|
|
$
|
1,197,563
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
85,846
|
|
90,115
|
|
|||
|
Distributions payable
|
25,684
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Other liabilities
|
27,858
|
|
43,404
|
|
|||
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
|
28,663
|
|
97,073
|
|
|||
|
Total liabilities (including $48,582 and $27,679, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities)
|
$
|
1,262,587
|
|
$
|
1,428,155
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Stockholders' equity
|
|||||||
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value (liquidation preference of $1,000), 50,000,000 shares authorized and 0 issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 0 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 111,671,372 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 100,000 shares authorized, 1,000 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014
|
1,117
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Additional paid in capital
|
1,993,760
|
|
1,781,427
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
1,543
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Distributions in excess of retained earnings
|
(268,991
|
)
|
(264,161
|
)
|
|||
|
Total Company stockholders' equity
|
$
|
1,727,429
|
|
$
|
1,517,266
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
15,929
|
|
3,655
|
|
|||
|
Total equity
|
$
|
1,743,358
|
|
$
|
1,520,921
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
3,005,945
|
|
$
|
2,949,076
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined consolidated financial statements.
F-
3
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2015
,
2014
and
2013
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||
|
Rooms revenues
|
$
|
663,224
|
|
$
|
631,901
|
|
$
|
443,267
|
|
||
|
Food and beverage revenues
|
259,036
|
|
235,066
|
|
168,368
|
|
|||||
|
Other revenues
|
53,884
|
|
59,699
|
|
40,236
|
|
|||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
976,144
|
|
$
|
926,666
|
|
$
|
651,871
|
|
||
|
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||
|
Rooms expenses
|
148,492
|
|
140,128
|
|
96,444
|
|
|||||
|
Food and beverage expenses
|
167,840
|
|
158,243
|
|
114,011
|
|
|||||
|
Other direct expenses
|
17,984
|
|
28,556
|
|
21,110
|
|
|||||
|
Other indirect expenses
|
226,108
|
|
214,272
|
|
157,385
|
|
|||||
|
Management and franchise fees
|
49,818
|
|
52,104
|
|
37,683
|
|
|||||
|
Total hotel operating expenses
|
$
|
610,242
|
|
$
|
593,303
|
|
$
|
426,633
|
|
||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
148,009
|
|
141,807
|
|
104,229
|
|
|||||
|
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance
|
49,717
|
|
44,625
|
|
29,763
|
|
|||||
|
Ground lease expense
|
5,204
|
|
5,541
|
|
1,923
|
|
|||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
25,556
|
|
38,895
|
|
13,445
|
|
|||||
|
Business management fees
|
—
|
|
1,474
|
|
12,743
|
|
|||||
|
Acquisition transaction costs
|
5,046
|
|
1,192
|
|
2,275
|
|
|||||
|
Pre-opening expenses
|
1,411
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
—
|
|
5,378
|
|
49,145
|
|
|||||
|
Separation and other start-up related expenses
|
26,887
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Total expenses
|
$
|
872,072
|
|
$
|
832,215
|
|
$
|
640,156
|
|
||
|
Operating income
|
$
|
104,072
|
|
$
|
94,451
|
|
$
|
11,715
|
|
||
|
Gain on sale of investment properties
|
43,015
|
|
693
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other income (expense)
|
4,916
|
|
324
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|||||
|
Interest expense
|
(50,816
|
)
|
(57,427
|
)
|
(52,792
|
)
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
(5,761
|
)
|
(1,713
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
|
—
|
|
4,216
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
$
|
95,426
|
|
$
|
40,544
|
|
$
|
(42,223
|
)
|
||
|
Income tax expense
|
(6,295
|
)
|
(5,865
|
)
|
(3,619
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
89,131
|
|
$
|
34,679
|
|
$
|
(45,842
|
)
|
||
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
(489
|
)
|
75,120
|
|
(5,626
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
88,642
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
116
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company
|
$
|
88,758
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
|
Distributions to preferred stockholders
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
88,746
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
F-
4
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income - Continued
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2015
,
2014
and
2013
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|||||||||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common stockholders
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
||
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations available to common stockholders
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
||
|
Net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
||
|
Weighted average number of common shares (basic)
|
111,989,686
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average number of common shares (diluted)
|
112,138,223
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income
|
$
|
88,642
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate derivative instruments
|
1,543
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
$
|
90,185
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
|||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests:
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities
|
116
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
116
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Comprehensive income attributable to the Company
|
$
|
90,301
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined consolidated financial statements.
F-
5
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Combined Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2015
,
2014
and
2013
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
Preferred Stock
|
Common Stock
|
Non-controlling Interests
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional paid in capital
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
Distributions in excess of retained earnings
|
Operating Partnership
|
Consolidated Joint Venture
|
Total Non-controlling Interests
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at January 1, 2013
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,540,469
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(322,492
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,217,977
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(51,468
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,621,111
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,621,111
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Contribution from InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,271,246
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,271,246
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Contributions from non-controlling interests, net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,611
|
|
1,611
|
|
1,611
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2013
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,190,604
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(373,960
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,611
|
|
$
|
1,611
|
|
$
|
1,818,255
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
109,799
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
109,799
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Distributions to InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,181,380
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(4,181,380
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Contribution from InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,772,203
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,772,203
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Contributions from non-controlling interests, net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,044
|
|
2,044
|
|
2,044
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,781,427
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(264,161
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,655
|
|
$
|
3,655
|
|
$
|
1,520,921
|
|
||||||||||
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
88,758
|
|
451
|
|
(567
|
)
|
(116
|
)
|
88,642
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of preferred shares, net of issuance costs
|
125
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
102
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
102
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Contributions from InvenTrust Properties Corp., net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
249,767
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
249,767
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common shares in connection with separation from InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
113,396,997
|
|
1,134
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase of common shares, net
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,759,344
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
(36,929
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(36,946
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends, common shares / units ($0.84)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(93,576
|
)
|
(102
|
)
|
—
|
|
(102
|
)
|
(93,678
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends, preferred shares ($92.36)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
32,719
|
|
—
|
|
664
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,244
|
|
—
|
|
2,244
|
|
2,908
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Redemption of preferred stock
|
(125
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(137
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,543
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Contributions from non-controlling interests
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
10,248
|
|
10,248
|
|
10,248
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
111,671,372
|
|
$
|
1,117
|
|
$
|
1,993,760
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
$
|
(268,991
|
)
|
$
|
2,593
|
|
$
|
13,336
|
|
$
|
15,929
|
|
$
|
1,743,358
|
|
||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined consolidated financial statements.
F-
6
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2015
,
2014
and
2013
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
88,642
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
144,424
|
|
172,964
|
|
152,297
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of above and below market leases and other lease tangibles
|
3,709
|
|
4,707
|
|
2,564
|
|
|||||
|
Amortization of debt premiums, discounts, and financing costs
|
3,756
|
|
4,461
|
|
4,360
|
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
5,761
|
|
67,105
|
|
20
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of investment property, net
|
(43,015
|
)
|
(136,385
|
)
|
(1,564
|
)
|
|||||
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
—
|
|
5,378
|
|
49,145
|
|
|||||
|
Equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
|
—
|
|
(4,216
|
)
|
33
|
|
|||||
|
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
451
|
|
|||||
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
6,102
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Release of restricted cash to operating
|
5,521
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other non-cash adjustments
|
111
|
|
—
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Accounts and rents receivable
|
(338
|
)
|
1,005
|
|
(6,831
|
)
|
|||||
|
Deferred costs and other assets
|
4,203
|
|
11,209
|
|
2,178
|
|
|||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(6,425
|
)
|
6,095
|
|
27,481
|
|
|||||
|
Other liabilities
|
(14,032
|
)
|
4,898
|
|
1,965
|
|
|||||
|
Prepayment penalties and defeasance
|
(5,267
|
)
|
(65,415
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
|
$
|
193,152
|
|
$
|
181,605
|
|
$
|
180,586
|
|
||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Purchase of investment properties
|
(245,260
|
)
|
(178,776
|
)
|
(942,945
|
)
|
|||||
|
Acquired goodwill, intangible assets, and intangible liabilities
|
—
|
|
(12,410
|
)
|
(12,534
|
)
|
|||||
|
Capital expenditures and tenant improvements
|
(53,782
|
)
|
(47,267
|
)
|
(49,782
|
)
|
|||||
|
Investment in development projects
|
(36,063
|
)
|
(27,031
|
)
|
(11,949
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from sale of investment properties
|
133,412
|
|
1,085,451
|
|
11,435
|
|
|||||
|
Consolidation of joint venture
|
—
|
|
(2,944
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from the sale of and return of capital from unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2,366
|
|
|||||
|
Contributions to unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
(30
|
)
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
122
|
|
|||||
|
Payoff of notes receivable
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,600
|
|
|||||
|
Restricted cash and escrows
|
3,954
|
|
(3,015
|
)
|
(16,544
|
)
|
|||||
|
Deposits for acquisition of hotel properties
|
(20,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Other assets (liabilities)
|
1,068
|
|
13,535
|
|
(7,328
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
|
$
|
(216,671
|
)
|
$
|
827,513
|
|
$
|
(1,025,559
|
)
|
||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Distribution to InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
(23,505
|
)
|
(4,168,694
|
)
|
(1,621,111
|
)
|
|||||
|
Contribution from InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
176,805
|
|
3,779,389
|
|
2,359,889
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from mortgage debt and notes payable
|
64,723
|
|
122,940
|
|
352,249
|
|
|||||
|
Payoffs of mortgage debt
|
(300,894
|
)
|
(648,872
|
)
|
(197,247
|
)
|
|||||
|
Principal payments of mortgage debt
|
(8,239
|
)
|
(12,067
|
)
|
(12,481
|
)
|
|||||
|
Payment of loan fees and deposits
|
(6,819
|
)
|
(2,083
|
)
|
(3,772
|
)
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from revolving line of credit draws
|
127,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Payments on revolving line of credit
|
(127,000
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from unsecured term loan
|
175,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Contributions from non-controlling interests
|
10,248
|
|
2,044
|
|
1,611
|
|
|||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares, net of offering costs
|
102
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Redemption of preferred shares
|
(137
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
(36,946
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends, common shares
|
(67,706
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends, preferred shares
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Payments for contingent consideration
|
—
|
|
(7,891
|
)
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
|
$
|
(17,380
|
)
|
$
|
(935,234
|
)
|
$
|
869,138
|
|
||
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(40,899
|
)
|
73,884
|
|
24,165
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year
|
163,053
|
|
89,169
|
|
65,004
|
|
|||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
|
$
|
122,154
|
|
$
|
163,053
|
|
$
|
89,169
|
|
||
F-
7
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2015
,
2014
and
2013
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||||||
|
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest
|
$
|
47,054
|
|
$
|
79,094
|
|
$
|
80,461
|
|
||
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
4,459
|
|
1,525
|
|
4,673
|
|
|||||
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||||||
|
Consolidation of assets of joint venture
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
21,833
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
||
|
Liabilities assumed at consolidation of joint venture
|
—
|
|
446
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Assumption of mortgage debt of joint venture
|
—
|
|
11,967
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
2,568
|
|
6,138
|
|
2,424
|
|
|||||
|
Assumption of unsecured line of credit facility by InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
(96,020
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Allocation of unsecured line of credit facility by InvenTrust Properties
|
—
|
|
7,377
|
|
88,643
|
|
|||||
|
Mortgage assumed by buyer upon disposal of property
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,683
|
|
|||||
|
Non-cash net distributions to InvenTrust Properties Corp.
|
(413
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Distributions payable
|
25,684
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Change in fair market value of designated interest rate swaps
|
1,543
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined consolidated financial statements.
F-
8
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
1
.
Organization
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the "Company" or "Xenia") is a Maryland corporation that invests primarily in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels. Prior to February 3, 2015, Xenia was a wholly owned subsidiary of InvenTrust Properties Corp. ("InvenTrust" formerly known as Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc.), its former parent.
On February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust through a taxable pro rata distribution by InvenTrust of
95%
of the outstanding common stock,
$0.01
par value per share (the "Common Stock"), of Xenia to holders of record of InvenTrust's common stock as of the close of business on January 20, 2015 (the "Record Date"). Each holder of record of InvenTrust's common stock received one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust’s common stock held at the close of business on the Record Date (the "Distribution"). In lieu of fractional shares, stockholders of InvenTrust received cash. On February 4, 2015, Xenia’s Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the ticker symbol "XHR." As a result of the Distribution, the Company became a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. Xenia intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for federal income tax purposes.
Substantially all of the Company's assets are held by, and all the operations are conducted through XHR LP (the "Operating Partnership"). XHR GP, Inc. is the sole general partner of XHR LP. XHR GP, Inc. is wholly owned by the Company. At
December 31, 2015
, the Company owned
99.5%
of the common limited partnership units issued by the Operating Partnership ("common units"). The remaining
0.5%
of the common units are owned by the other limited partners which includes executive officers and members of our board of directors. To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Therefore, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease the hotel properties to XHR Holding Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, "XHR Holding"), the Company's taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"), which engages third-party eligible independent operators to manage the hotels.
The accompanying combined consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, XHR Holding, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated joint venture investments. The Company's subsidiaries and joint ventures generally consist of limited liability companies ("LLCs"), limited partnerships ("LPs") and the TRS. The effects of all significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the Company owned
50
lodging properties,
48
of which were wholly owned, with a total of
12,548
rooms (unaudited), including a
75%
ownership interest in
two
hotels owned through
two
consolidated joint ventures. As of
December 31, 2014
, the Company owned
48
lodging properties,
46
of which were wholly owned, with
12,636
rooms (unaudited), including a
75%
ownership interest in
two
hotels under development. As of
December 31, 2013
, the Company owned
99
lodging properties with
19,337
rooms (unaudited), including
52
hotels with
6,976
rooms (unaudited) classified as held for sale.
2
.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
As described in Note 1, on February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust. Prior to the separation, the Company effectuated certain reorganization transactions which were designed to consolidate the ownership of its hotels into its Operating Partnership, consolidate its TRS lessees in its TRS, facilitate its separation from InvenTrust, and enable the Company to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. The accompanying combined consolidated financial statements prior to the spin-off have been "carved out" of InvenTrust’s consolidated financial statements and reflect significant assumptions and allocations. The combined consolidated financial statements reflect the operations of the Company after giving effect to the reorganization transactions, the disposition of other hotels previously owned by the Company, and the spin-off, and include allocations of costs from certain corporate and shared functions provided to the Company by InvenTrust, as well as costs associated with participation by certain of the Company's executives and employees in InvenTrust’s benefit plans. Corporate costs directly associated with the Company's principal executive offices, personnel and other administrative costs are reflected as general and administrative expenses on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Additionally, prior to the spin-off, InvenTrust allocated to the Company a portion of its corporate overhead costs based upon the Company's percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses. The general and administrative expenses for the period from January 1, 2015 to February 3, 2015 and for the years ended
December 31, 2014
and
2013
include costs related to the reorganization transactions and spin off that are non-recurring in
F-
9
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
nature. Based on these presentation matters, the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 may not be comparable to prior periods.
As InvenTrust was managing various asset portfolios, the extent of services and benefits a portfolio received was based on the size of its assets. Therefore, using average invested assets to allocate costs was a reasonable reflection of the services and other benefits received by the Company and complied with applicable accounting guidance. However, actual costs may have differed from allocated costs if the Company had operated as a stand-alone entity during such period and those differences may have been material.
Each property maintains its own books and financial records and each entity's assets are not available to satisfy the liabilities of other affiliated entities, except as otherwise disclosed in Note 8.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the combined consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses. These estimates are prepared using management's best judgment, after considering past, current and expected economic conditions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Risks and Uncertainties
The state of the overall economy can significantly impact hotel operational performance and thus, impact the Company's financial position. Should any of the hotels experience a significant decline in operational performance, it may affect the Company's ability to make distributions to our shareholders and service debt or meet other financial obligations.
Reclassifications and Revisions
Certain reclassifications were made on the combined consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 to present the hotel assets sold in 2015 as assets held for sale and liabilities associated with assets held for sale. See Note
4
for further information.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 to disaggregate real estate taxes, personal property taxes, insurance, ground leases, general and administrative and acquisition transaction costs to conform to the presentation for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
.
Additionally, upon the early adoption of
ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, the Company made
reclassifications of
$8.3 million
and
$6.7 million
to present deferred loan costs in debt on the combined consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which were previously included in other assets.
Consolidation
The Company evaluates its investments in limited liability companies and partnerships to determine whether such entities may be a variable interest entity ("VIE"). If the entity is a VIE, the determination of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary must be made. The primary beneficiary determination is based on a qualitative assessment as to whether the entity has (i) power to direct significant activities of the VIE and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The Company will consolidate a VIE if it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810, Consolidation. The equity method of accounting is applied to entities in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary as defined in FASB ASC 810, or the entity is not a VIE and the Company does not have effective control, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions.
Non-controlling Interests
The Company’s combined consolidated financial statements include entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Non-controlling interest is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a consolidating parent. Such non-controlling interests are reported on the combined consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries are reported at the
F-
10
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and non-controlling interests. Income or loss is allocated to non-controlling interests based on their weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The combined consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for stockholders’ equity, non-controlling interests and total equity.
However, if the Company’s non-controlling interests are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the issuer, they must be classified outside of permanent equity. The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions. Additionally, with respect to non-controlling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company evaluates whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract. As of
December 31, 2015
, all share-based payments awards are included in permanent equity.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the consolidated results of the Company include the following ownership interests held by owners other than the Company: (i) the common units in the Operating Partnership held by certain of the Company's executive officers and Board of Directors, and (ii) the outside ownership interest in our
two
joint ventures.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of amounts derived from hotel operations, including the sales of rooms, food and beverage and other ancillary amenities. Revenue is recognized when rooms are occupied and services have been rendered. Cash received prior to guest arrival is recorded as an advance from the guest and recognized as revenue at the time of occupancy. Sales, use, occupancy, and similar taxes are collected and presented on a net basis (excluded from revenues) in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. For retail operations, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the retail leases. These revenue sources are affected by conditions impacting the travel and hospitality industry as well as competition from other hotels and businesses in similar markets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements purchased with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions. The combined account balances at one or more institutions periodically exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insurance coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company believes that the risk is not significant, as the Company does not anticipate the financial institutions’ non-performance.
Restricted Cash and Escrows
Restricted cash and escrows primarily consists of hotel furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves of
$69.9 million
and
$76.3 million
as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
, respectively. Additionally, restricted cash includes lenders’ restricted escrows of
$3.7 million
and
$5.4 million
for replacement reserves and real estate taxes as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
, respectively. The balance of restricted cash consists of furniture, fixture and equipment deposits, mortgage escrows for insurance and post acquisition escrows of
$3.7 million
and
$5.3 million
as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
, respectively.
Capitalization and Depreciation
Real estate is reflected at cost less accumulated depreciation. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation expense is computed using the straight line method. Building and other improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of
30 years
for building and improvements and
5
to
15 years
for furniture, fixtures and equipment and site improvements.
Loan fees are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the life of the related loan as a component of interest expense.
Direct and indirect costs that are clearly related to the construction and improvements of investment properties are capitalized. Costs incurred for property taxes and insurance are capitalized during periods in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress. Interest costs are also capitalized during such periods, which included
$0.7 million
and
$0.3 million
as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
, respectively.
F-
11
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
Acquisition of Real Estate
The Company allocates the purchase price of each acquired business (as defined in the accounting guidance related to business combinations, FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations) between tangible and intangible assets at full fair value on the acquisition date. Such tangible and intangible assets include land, building and improvements, furniture and fixtures, inventory, acquired above market and below market leases, in-place lease value (if applicable), advanced bookings, customer relationships, and any assumed financing that is determined to be above or below market terms. Any additional amounts are allocated to goodwill as required, based on the remaining purchase price in excess of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The allocation of the purchase price is an area that requires judgment and significant estimates.
The Company determines whether any financing assumed is above or below market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar investment properties. The Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to the estimated acquired in-place lease costs, based on estimated lease execution costs for similar leases as well as lost rent payments during assumed lease up period when calculating as if vacant fair values for properties acquired with space leased to third party tenants, which is typically retail or restaurant space. The Company also evaluates each acquired leases, including ground leases, based upon current market rates at the acquisition date and considers various factors including geographical location, size and location of leased land or retail space in determining whether the acquired lease is above or below market. After an acquired lease is determined to be above or below market, the Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to such above or below acquired lease costs based upon the present value of the difference between the contractual lease rate and the estimated market rate. For leases with fixed rate renewals, renewal periods are included in the calculation of above or below market in-place lease values. The determination of the discount rate used in the present value calculation is based upon the "risk free rate" and current interest rates. This discount rate is a significant factor in determining the market valuation which requires judgment of subjective factors such as market knowledge, economics, demographics, location, visibility, age and physical condition of the property.
The Company expenses acquisition costs of all acquired businesses as incurred. This includes all costs related to finding, analyzing and negotiating a transaction, whether or not the acquisition is completed.
Goodwill
The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the fair values assigned to assets acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is recognized and allocated to specific properties. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment.
In accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, the Company tests goodwill for impairment by making a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the specific property's fair value is less than its carrying amount before application of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The two-step goodwill test is not performed for those assets where it is concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a specific property is greater than its carrying amount. For those specific properties where this is not the case, the two step procedure detailed below is followed in order to determine the amount of goodwill impairment.
In the first step, the Company compares the estimated fair value of each property with goodwill to the carrying value of the property’s assets, including goodwill. The fair value is based on estimated future cash flow projections that utilize discount and capitalization rates, which are generally unobservable in the market place (Level 3 inputs), but approximate the inputs the Company believes would be utilized by market participants in assessing fair value. The estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors, including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions. If the carrying amount of the property’s assets, including goodwill, exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In this second step, if the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded in an amount equal to that excess. The Company tested goodwill for impairment as of
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
and recorded
no
impairment to goodwill as of
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
.
Impairment
The Company assesses the carrying values of the respective long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable, such as a reduction in the expected holding
F-
12
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
period of the asset or a change in demand for lodging at the Company's hotels. If it is determined that the carrying value is not recoverable because the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed carrying value, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair value. The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties is a significant estimate that can and does change based on the Company's continuous process of analyzing each property and reviewing assumptions about uncertain inherent factors, as well as the economic condition of the property at a particular point in time.
The use of projected future cash flows and related holding period is based on assumptions that are consistent with the estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan the Company uses to manage its underlying business. However, assumptions and estimates about future cash flows and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions and the Company’s ultimate investment intent that occur subsequent to the impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of the real estate properties.
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the carrying value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities may be other than temporarily impaired. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss is measured as the excess of the carrying value of the investment over the fair value of the investment. The fair value of the underlying investment includes a review of expected discounted cash flows to be received from the investee.
Involuntary Conversion of Assets
On August 24, 2014, Napa, California experienced a 6.0 magnitude earthquake that impacted
two
of the Company's lodging properties. The Company recorded involuntary losses of
$9.0
million, which represents the book value of the properties and equipment written off for the property damage. As it was probable that the Company would receive insurance proceeds to compensate for the property damages, the Company also recorded an offsetting insurance recovery receivable of
$9.0 million
. As of
December 31, 2015
, there was
no
remaining receivable related to property damage insurance recoveries.
The Company will not record an insurance recovery receivable for business interruption losses until the amount for such recoveries is known and the amount is realizable. The business interruption insurance recovery for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
was
$6.2 million
, and is included in other income on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
Investment Properties Held for Sale
In determining whether to classify an investment property as held for sale, the Company considers whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the investment property; (ii) the investment property is available for immediate sale, in its present condition; (iii) the Company has initiated a program to locate a buyer; (iv) the Company believes that the sale of the investment property is probable; (v) the Company has received a significant non-refundable deposit for the purchase of the property; (vi) the Company is actively marketing the investment property for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its fair value; and (vii) actions required for the Company to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made to the plan.
If all of the above criteria are met, the Company classifies the investment property as held for sale. On the day that these criteria are met, the Company suspends depreciation on the investment properties held for sale, including depreciation for additions, as well as on the amortization of acquired in-place leases. The investment properties and liabilities associated with those investment properties that are held for sale are classified separately on the combined consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period and recorded at the lesser of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Additionally, if the sale constitutes a strategic shift with a major effect on operations, the operations are classified on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Disposition of Real Estate
The Company accounts for dispositions in accordance with FASB ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales. The Company recognizes gain in full when real estate is sold, provided (a) the profit is determinable, that is, the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated, and (b) the earnings process is virtually complete, that is, the seller is not obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit and the buyer has paid a significant non0refundable deposit. Prior to 2014, the Company recorded all dispositions as discontinued operations for the applicable periods presented. Upon the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-08,
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity
, the Company records a disposition as discontinued
F-
13
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
operations only if it represents a strategic shift and has (or will have) a major effect on the Company's results and operations. In November 2014, the Company sold
52
select-service hotels (the "Suburban Select Service Portfolio") consisting of
6,976
rooms
(unaudited)
. The sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio represented a strategic shift and had a major impact on the financial statements. The operations of these 52 select service hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
. Other dispositions in 2014 and a disposition in 2015 are still classified as continuing operations.
Discontinued Operations
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08,
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity
, which included amendments that changed the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and required additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations. In addition, ASU 2014-08 expands the disclosure requirements for disposals that meet the definition of a discontinued operation and requires entities to disclose information about disposals of individually significant components that do not meet the definition of discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that began after December 15, 2014. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2014-08. Effective January 1, 2014 asset disposals were included as a component of income from continuing operations unless the disposal represented a strategic shift and has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's results and operations.
Deferred Financing Costs
Financing costs related to long-term debt are recorded at cost and are amortized as interest expense over the life of the related debt instrument, unless there is a significant modification to the debt instrument. Accumulated amortization at
December 31, 2015 and 2014
was
$8.3 million
and
$6.7 million
, respectively.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effects of interest rate changes. The Company limits the risks associated with interest rate changes by following established risk management policies and procedures which may include the use of derivative instruments. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with offsetting changes recorded to other comprehensive income (loss). The Company nets assets and liabilities when the right of offset exists. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of a cash flow hedge are recognized as interest expense. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
Comprehensive Income
The purpose of reporting comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in equity of an entity that result from recognized transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. Comprehensive income consists of all components of income, including other comprehensive income, which is excluded from net income. For the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
, comprehensive income (loss) was
$90.3 million
,
$109.8 million
and
$(51.5) million
, respectively. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
, the Company's accumulated other comprehensive income was
$1.5 million
and
$0
, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as, and has operated in a manner that will allow the Company to qualify as, a REIT for federal income tax purposes. So long as the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is currently distributed to its stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and will not be eligible to re-elect REIT status during the four years following the failure. Even if
F-
14
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Accordingly, the Company, through its Operating Partnership, leases all of its hotels to subsidiaries of its TRS. The TRS is subject to federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates. Lease revenues at REIT subsidiaries or landlords and lease expense from the TRS lessees are eliminated in consolidation for financial statement purposes.
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax-planning strategies. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company’s analysis in determining the deferred tax asset valuation allowance involves management judgment and assumptions.
Income tax expense in the combined consolidated financial statements for the period from January 1, 2015 through February 3, 2015 and for
year ended
December 31, 2014
was calculated on a "carve-out" basis from InvenTrust.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company has adopted a share-based incentive plan that provides for the grant of stock options, stock awards, restricted stock units, performance units and other equity-based awards. Share-based compensation is measured at the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant, adjusted for forfeitures, and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the longest vesting period for each grant for the entire award. The determination of fair value of these awards is subjective and involves significant estimates and assumptions including expected volatility of the Company's shares, expected dividend yield, expected term and assumptions of whether certain of these awards will achieve parity with other Operating Partnership units or achieve performance thresholds. Share-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and capitalized in building and other improvements in the combined consolidated balance sheets for certain employees that manage property developments, renovations and capital improvements.
During 2014, the Company maintained the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan. The 2014 Share Unit Plan provided for the grant of "share unit" awards to eligible participants. The value of a "share unit" was determined based on a phantom capitalization of the Company's lodging business and does not necessarily correspond to the value of a share of common stock of Xenia. Vesting of the share units granted in 2014 is conditioned upon the occurrence of a triggering event, such as a listing, which occurred on February 4, 2015. The Company did not recognize share based compensation expense until the triggering event occurred.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing the net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding the weighted average number of unvested shared-based compensation awards outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of any dilutive securities. Any anti-dilutive securities are excluded from the diluted earnings per-share calculation.
Segment Information
We allocate resources and assess operating performance based on individual hotels and consider each one of our hotels to be an operating segment. All of our individual operating segments meet the aggregation criteria. All of our other real estate investment activities are immaterial and meet the aggregation criteria, and thus, we report one segment: investment in hotel properties.
F-
15
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective, although it will not affect the accounting for rental related revenues. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, pursuant to ASU No. 2015-09 which deferred the adoption date by one year. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2014-09 will have on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The ASU amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities ("VIEs") and general partners' investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted.
The Company is evaluating the effect of ASU No. 2015-02, but does not expect it to have a significant impact on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption of the standard permitted, and should be applied retrospectively to all periods. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2015-03. Effective January 1, 2015, the Company will reclassify deferred financing costs from other assets to be shown net of debt in the liabilities section of the Company's combined consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company made reclassifications of
$8.3 million
and
$6.7 million
, respectively, to present deferred loan costs in debt on the combined consolidated balance sheets, respectively, which were previously included in other assets.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer in a business combination to account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, acquirers must recognize measurement-period adjustments during the period in which they determine the amounts, including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. This update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted.
The Company does not expect ASU No. 2015-16 to have a significant impact on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes by requiring that deferred tax assets and liabilities be presented as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company does not expect ASU No. 2015-17 to have a significant impact on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which replaces ASC Topic 840, Leases, and requires most lessee leases to be recorded on the Company's balance sheet as either operating or financing leases as a right of use asset with a corresponding lease liability measured at present value. Operating leases will be recognized on the income statement as lease expense and financing leases will be accounted for
similar to the accounting for amortizing debt. ASU 2016-02,
allows lessors to capitalize only incremental initial direct leasing costs and will require only tenant payments for tax and insurance to be recognized as lease revenue.
The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.
F-
16
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
3
.
Acquired Properties
During the year ended
December 31, 2015
, the Company acquired
three
hotels for a total purchase price of
$245 million
, excluding closing costs of $
4.5 million
, which were expensed and included in acquisitions costs on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. The sources of funding for the acquisition were cash on hand and borrowings under the Company's senior unsecured credit facility. The following is a summary of the hotel acquisitions for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
(dollar amounts in thousands):
|
Property
|
Location
|
Acquisition Date
|
Rooms
(unaudited)
|
Purchase price
(1)
|
||||||
|
Canary Santa Barbara
|
Santa Barbara, CA
|
July 2015
|
97
|
$
|
80,000
|
|
||||
|
Hotel Palomar Philadelphia
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
July 2015
|
230
|
100,000
|
|
|||||
|
RiverPlace Hotel
|
Portland, OR
|
July 2015
|
84
|
65,000
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
411
|
$
|
245,000
|
|
||||||
|
(1)
|
All hotels are managed by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC and were acquired as part of a portfolio acquisition.
|
Also in July 2015, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire the Hotel Commonwealth in Boston, Massachusetts for a purchase price of
$136 million
, excluding closing costs. The Company closed on the sale in January 2016, upon the seller completing a
96
room hotel expansion. As of
December 31, 2015
, the Company had a non-refundable deposit of
$20 million
, which is included in other assets on the combined consolidated balance sheet.
During the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, the Company acquired
one
lodging property and
one
retail property for a combined purchase price of
$190.4 million
, excluding closing costs of
$1.2 million
. The following is a summary of the acquisitions for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
(dollar amounts in thousands):
|
Property
|
Location
|
Acquisition Date
|
Rooms / Square Feet (unaudited)
|
Purchase Price
|
||||||
|
Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel
|
Honolulu, HI
|
February 2014
|
645 Rooms
|
$
|
183,000
|
|
||||
|
Key West Bottling Court
|
Key West, FL
|
November 2014
|
13,332 Square Feet
|
7,400
|
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
190,400
|
|
|||||||
The following reflects the purchase price allocation for the
three
hotels acquired during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
and
one
hotel and
one
retail property acquired during the year ended
December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
:
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
49,743
|
|
$
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
Building and improvements
|
172,928
|
|
146,695
|
|
|||
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
21,907
|
|
27,087
|
|
|||
|
Intangibles and other assets
|
422
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total fixed assets
|
245,000
|
|
177,982
|
|
|||
|
Below market ground lease
|
—
|
|
9,516
|
|
|||
|
Net other assets and liabilities
|
—
|
|
2,902
|
|
|||
|
Total purchase price
|
$
|
245,000
|
|
$
|
190,400
|
|
|
The revenues and net income attributable to the properties acquired in 2014 were approximately
$35.2 million
and
$7.4 million
, respectively, for the year
December 31, 2014
and are included in the Company's combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The revenues and net income attributable to the properties acquired in 2015 were approximately
$24.4 million
and
$5.0 million
, respectively, for the year
December 31, 2015
and are included in the Company's combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the results of operations as if the
2015
acquisitions had taken place on January 1,
2014
and if the
2014
acquisitions had taken place on January 1,
2013
. The unaudited pro forma financial
F-
17
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
information is not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations of the Company would have been, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. The unaudited proforma financial information is as follows (in thousands, except per share and per share data):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$
|
1,003,193
|
|
$
|
981,243
|
|
$
|
692,648
|
|
||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
(1)
|
$
|
88,581
|
|
$
|
108,779
|
|
$
|
(41,536
|
)
|
||
|
Net income per share attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
||
|
Weighted average number of common shares - basic
|
111,989,686
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted
|
112,138,223
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
The pro forma results above exclude acquisition costs of $
4.5 million
and
$1.2 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
|
4
.
Disposed Properties
In January 2015,
one
land parcel, valued at
$1.2 million
, was transferred to InvenTrust and was included in the net contributions from InvenTrust in the accompanying combined consolidated statement of changes in equity.
In September 2015, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Hyatt Regency Orange County, at which time the hotel was determined to have met the held for sale criteria and was presented as assets and liabilities associated with assets held for sale on the Company's combined consolidated balance sheet for all periods presented. In October 2015, the Company sold the Hyatt Regency Orange County hotel for a sale price of
$137 million
, and recognized a gain of
$43.0 million
on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company received net proceeds of
$70.6 million
, after paying off the
$61.9 million
outstanding property level mortgage at the time of the sale, and retained the
$5.9 million
balance in the hotel's capital expenditure reserve account.
The operating results of
the hotel are included in the Company's combined consolidated financial statements as part of continuing operations in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08, as it did not represent a strategic shift or have a major effect on the Company's results of operations. The assets and liabilities of the hotel are included in assets and liabilities associated with assets held for sale at their respective net book values on the accompanying combined consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2014
.
During the year ended
December 31, 2014
, the Company disposed of
55
hotel properties. The operating results of
three
hotel properties, including the Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center, DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria, and Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands, are included in the Company's combined consolidated financial statements as part of continuing operations in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08, as they did not represent a strategic shift or have a major effect on the Company's results of operations.
The Company recognized a gain of
$0.7 million
related to the sale of these properties, which is included in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended
December 31, 2014
.
The remaining
52
lodging properties were sold by InvenTrust on November 17, 2014 (the "Suburban Select Service Portfolio"), which were properties previously overseen by the Company. This disposition represented a strategic shift and had a major effect on the Company's results of operations. Accordingly, the results of operations of these
52
lodging properties are presented as discontinued operations in the combined consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2015
, 2014, and 2013 pursuant to ASU 2014-08. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the net proceeds received for the disposition of the
55
hotel properties was
$1,085 million
and the Company incurred
$8.0 million
loan defeasance costs.
The Company recognized a gain of
$135.7 million
related to the sale of these properties, which is included in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended
December 31, 2014
in discontinued operations.
F-
18
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
The following represents the disposition details for the properties sold in the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
(in thousands, except rooms):
|
Property
|
Date
|
Rooms (unaudited)
|
Gross Disposition Price
|
|||||
|
Hyatt Regency Orange County
(1)
|
10/2015
|
656
|
$
|
137,000
|
|
|||
|
Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center
(1)
|
05/2014
|
166
|
13,250
|
|
||||
|
DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria
(1)
|
08/2014
|
154
|
12,600
|
|
||||
|
Suburban Select Service Portfolio - 52 properties
(2)
|
11/2014
|
6,976
|
1,071,000
|
|
||||
|
Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands
(1)
|
12/2014
|
161
|
4,600
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
8,113
|
$
|
1,238,450
|
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Included in net income from continuing operations in the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
|
|
(2)
|
Included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations in the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
|
As discontinued operations, the components are presented below and include the results of operations for the respective periods that the Company owned such assets or was involved with the operations of such ventures during the years ended
December 31, 2015
, 2014, and 2013 (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
224,490
|
|
$
|
232,521
|
|
||
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
—
|
|
35,864
|
|
50,634
|
|
|||||
|
Other expenses
|
511
|
|
146,229
|
|
156,751
|
|
|||||
|
Operating (loss) income from discontinued operations
|
(511
|
)
|
42,397
|
|
25,136
|
|
|||||
|
Interest and other expense
|
—
|
|
(33,012
|
)
|
(32,719
|
)
|
|||||
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
—
|
|
(4,566
|
)
|
413
|
|
|||||
|
Gain on sale of properties
|
22
|
|
135,692
|
|
1,564
|
|
|||||
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
—
|
|
(65,391
|
)
|
(20
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations
|
$
|
(489
|
)
|
$
|
75,120
|
|
$
|
(5,626
|
)
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from the properties classified as discontinued operations for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
and
2013
was
$(0.5) million
,
$(18.2) million
and $
41.9 million
, respectively. Net cash provided by (used in) for investing activities by the properties classified as discontinued operations for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
and
2013
was
$0
,
$1,043.3 million
and
$(6.0) million
, respectively, consisting primarily of proceeds from the dispositions, net of capital expenditures.
5
.
Investment in Partially Owned Entities
Consolidated Entities
During 2013, the Company entered into
two
joint ventures for each to develop a lodging property, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, respectively. The Company has ownership interests of
75%
in each joint venture. These entities are considered VIE's as defined in FASB ASC 810, Consolidation, because the entities do not have enough equity to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company determined that it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE's that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, as well as the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE's that could potentially be significant to the Company, or the right to receive benefits from the VIE's that could potentially be significant to the Company. As such, the Company has a controlling financial interest and is considered the primary beneficiary of each of these entities. Therefore, these entities are consolidated by the Company.
F-
19
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
The following are the liabilities of the consolidated VIE's, which are non-recourse to the Company, and the assets that can be used to settle those obligations (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||
|
Net investment properties
|
$
|
74,592
|
|
$
|
39,736
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
2,548
|
|
1,318
|
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
77,140
|
|
$
|
41,054
|
|
|
|
Mortgages, notes and margins payable
|
(45,734
|
)
|
(21,214
|
)
|
|||
|
Other liabilities
|
(2,848
|
)
|
(6,465
|
)
|
|||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
(48,582
|
)
|
$
|
(27,679
|
)
|
|
|
Net assets
|
$
|
28,558
|
|
$
|
13,375
|
|
|
In August 2015, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston began operations as a
50
room (unaudited) boutique lifestyle hotel. The total development cost of the property was
$32 million
. In October 2015, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook began operations as a
100
room (unaudited) boutique lifestyle hotel. The total development cost of the property was
$45 million
.
All operations of the two hotels from the date of their respective opening through
December 31, 2015
were consolidated in the accompanying combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income, with a corresponding allocation for non-controlling interests.
Under the terms of the
two
joint venture agreements, the Company's total capital investment in these
two
development properties was limited to
$7.2 million
and
$9.6 million
for the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, respectively, and as of
December 31, 2015
there is
no
amount remaining to be invested by the Company.
Unconsolidated Entities
Prior to February 21, 2014, the Company owned an interest in
one
unconsolidated partnership entity. On February 21, 2014, the Company bought out its partner's interest in this entity and began consolidating this investment in its financial statements. In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded the assets and liabilities of the entity at fair value resulting in a gain of
$4.5 million
. Prior to the entity being wholly owned, the equity method of accounting was used to account for this investment and the Company’s share of net income or loss was reflected in the combined consolidated financial statements as e
quity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net
. In November 2014, this property was sold as part of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, and as of
December 31, 2015
, the Company does
no
t have any remaining investments in unconsolidated entities.
The summarized results of operations of the Company's investment prior to the purchase of the remaining interest in the joint venture for the years ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013
are presented below (in thousands):
|
January 1 -
February 20, 2014
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2013
|
||||||
|
Revenues
|
$
|
932
|
|
$
|
7,950
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
||||||
|
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
43
|
|
636
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
129
|
|
1,127
|
|
|||
|
Operating expenses, ground rent and general and administrative expenses
|
802
|
|
4,905
|
|
|||
|
Termination fee
|
325
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Total expenses
|
1,299
|
|
6,668
|
|
|||
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(367
|
)
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
Company's share of net loss
|
$
|
(293
|
)
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
F-
20
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded an impairment of
$1.0 million
on its investment in the unconsolidated joint venture and recorded a gain of
$0.5 million
attributable to the sale of
three
lodging joint ventures, which were included on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income in equity in earnings (loss), (impairment) of investment and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net for the year then ended.
6
.
Transactions with Related Parties
The following table summarizes the Company’s related party transactions (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
General and administrative allocation
(a)
|
$
|
1,135
|
|
$
|
20,747
|
|
$
|
11,658
|
|
|||
|
Business management fee
(b)
|
—
|
|
1,474
|
|
12,743
|
|
||||||
|
Loan placement fees
(c)
|
—
|
|
68
|
|
208
|
|
||||||
|
Transition services fees
(d)
|
514
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||||
|
(a)
|
General and administrative allocations include costs from certain corporate and shared functions provided to the Company by InvenTrust, as well as costs associated with participation by certain of the Company's executives in InvenTrust's benefit plans. InvenTrust allocated to the Company a portion of its corporate overhead costs which was based upon the Company's percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. As InvenTrust was managing various asset portfolios, the extent of services and benefits a portfolio received was based on the size of its assets. Therefore, using average invested assets to allocate costs was a reasonable reflection of the services and other benefits received by the Company and complied with applicable accounting guidance. However, actual costs may have differed from allocated costs if the Company had operated as a stand-alone entity during such period and those differences may have been material. For the years ended
December 31, 2015
,
2014
and
2013
, the general and administrative allocation related to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio was
$0
,
$4.8 million
and
$2.7 million
and was included in discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. Following the time of the spin-off, the Company was not allocated any further general and administrative expenses.
|
|
(b)
|
During the first quarter of 2014, InvenTrust paid a business management fee to its external manager, Inland American Business Manager and Advisor, Inc. (the "Business Manager") based on the average invested assets. The Company was allocated a portion of the business management fee based upon its percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust entered into a series of agreements and amendments to existing agreements with affiliates of The Inland Group, Inc. pursuant to which InvenTrust began the process of becoming entirely self-managed (collectively, the "Self-Management Transactions"). In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate its management agreement with the Business Manager. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. As a result, the Company was not allocated a business management fee after January 2014.
|
|
(c)
|
The Company paid a related party of InvenTrust
0.2%
of the principal amount of each loan placed for the Company. Such costs were capitalized as loan fees and amortized over the respective loan term. As a result of the spin-off, the Company will no longer be allocated any loan placement fees.
|
|
(d)
|
In connection with the Company's separation from InvenTrust, the Company entered into a transition services agreement with InvenTrust under which InvenTrust has agreed to provide certain transition services to the Company, including services related to information technology systems, financial reporting and accounting and legal services. The expiration date varied by service provided and the agreement terminates on the earlier of March 31, 2016 or the termination of the last service provided under it. In June 2015, the Company terminated all fee-based services provided under the transition services agreement effective July 31, 2015, and thereafter, no additional fees are expected to be incurred for services provided by InvenTrust.
|
As of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, the Company owed
$2.6 million
and
$12.7 million
, respectively, to InvenTrust which is included in other liabilities in the combined consolidated balance sheets. As of
December 31, 2015
, the amount due to InvenTrust was for purchases of furniture, fixtures and equipment funded by InvenTrust and for other taxes paid by InvenTrust on behalf of the Company. As of
December 31, 2014
, the amount due to InvenTrust was related to transaction and separation costs associated with the spin-off.
F-
21
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
7
.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The following table summarizes the Company’s identified intangible assets, intangible liabilities and goodwill as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
(in thousands):
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||
|
Intangible assets:
|
|||||||
|
Acquired in-place lease intangibles
|
$
|
2,942
|
|
$
|
3,127
|
|
|
|
Acquired above market lease costs
|
482
|
|
548
|
|
|||
|
Acquired below market ground lease
|
20,026
|
|
20,026
|
|
|||
|
Advance bookings
|
12,092
|
|
13,870
|
|
|||
|
Accumulated amortization
|
(17,140
|
)
|
(15,143
|
)
|
|||
|
Net intangible assets
|
18,402
|
|
22,428
|
|
|||
|
Goodwill
|
42,113
|
|
42,113
|
|
|||
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
$
|
60,515
|
|
$
|
64,541
|
|
|
|
Intangible liabilities:
|
|||||||
|
Acquired below market lease costs
|
$
|
(4,631
|
)
|
$
|
(4,631
|
)
|
|
|
Acquired above market ground lease
|
—
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|||
|
Accumulated amortization
|
691
|
|
677
|
|
|||
|
Intangible liabilities, net
|
$
|
(3,940
|
)
|
$
|
(4,212
|
)
|
|
The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above market lease costs and acquired below market lease costs are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease, including the respective renewal period for below market lease costs with fixed rate renewals, as an adjustment to other revenues. Amortization pertaining to the above market lease is applied as a reduction to other revenues. Amortization pertaining to the below market lease costs is applied as an increase to other revenues. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease intangibles is amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease and is recorded as amortization expense. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired below market ground lease is amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease and is recorded as ground lease expense. The portion of the purchase price allocated to advance bookings is amortized on a straight line basis over the estimated life and is recorded as depreciation and amortization.
The following table summarizes the amortization related to intangibles for the years ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014
(in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Amortization of:
|
|||||||
|
Acquired above market lease costs
|
$
|
(124
|
)
|
$
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
Acquired below market lease costs
|
272
|
|
370
|
|
|||
|
Net other revenues increase
|
$
|
148
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-place lease intangibles
|
$
|
964
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
|
Acquired below market ground lease
|
$
|
380
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
|
Advance bookings
|
$
|
2,485
|
|
$
|
3,549
|
|
|
F-
22
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
The following table presents the amortization during the next five years and thereafter related to intangible assets and liabilities at
December 31, 2015
(in thousands):
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Acquired above market lease costs
|
$
|
(108
|
)
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
(179
|
)
|
||||||
|
Acquired below market lease costs
|
254
|
|
249
|
|
194
|
|
194
|
|
194
|
|
2,855
|
|
3,940
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net other revenues increase
|
$
|
146
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
$
|
2,854
|
|
$
|
3,761
|
|
||||||
|
Acquired in-place lease intangibles
|
$
|
608
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,336
|
|
||||||
|
Advance bookings
|
1,464
|
|
31
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,507
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Acquired below market ground lease
|
426
|
|
426
|
|
426
|
|
426
|
|
426
|
|
13,249
|
|
15,379
|
|
|||||||||||||
F-
23
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
8
.
Debt
Debt as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
Balance Outstanding as of
|
||||||||||||
|
Rate Type
(1)
|
Rate
|
Maturity Date
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||||
|
Mortgage Loans
|
||||||||||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown
|
Fixed
|
5.45
|
%
|
11/11/2015
|
—
|
|
55,859
|
|
||||
|
Andaz San Diego
|
Variable
|
3.67
|
%
|
3/1/2016
|
—
|
|
26,315
|
|
||||
|
Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa
|
Variable
|
2.74
|
%
|
3/23/2016
|
34,374
|
|
35,091
|
|
||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Chicago North Shore/Evanston
|
Fixed
|
5.94
|
%
|
6/1/2016
|
—
|
|
18,777
|
|
||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando
|
Fixed
|
5.82
|
%
|
10/1/2016
|
49,360
|
|
50,298
|
|
||||
|
Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center
|
Fixed
|
4.50
|
%
|
12/1/2016
|
—
|
|
74,049
|
|
||||
|
Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center
|
Fixed
|
5.50
|
%
|
12/6/2016
|
97,000
|
|
97,000
|
|
||||
|
Renaissance Austin Hotel
|
Fixed
|
5.51
|
%
|
12/8/2016
|
83,000
|
|
83,000
|
|
||||
|
Hyatt Regency Orange County
(2)
|
Fixed
|
5.25
|
%
|
1/3/2017
|
—
|
|
63,035
|
|
||||
|
Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown
|
Fixed
|
4.00
|
%
|
3/1/2017
|
22,607
|
|
23,261
|
|
||||
|
Hampton Inn & Suites Denver Downtown
|
Fixed
|
5.25
|
%
|
3/1/2017
|
—
|
|
13,625
|
|
||||
|
Marriott San Francisco Airport Waterfront
|
Fixed
|
5.40
|
%
|
4/1/2017
|
—
|
|
53,585
|
|
||||
|
Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB
|
Fixed
|
5.25
|
%
|
4/1/2017
|
13,353
|
|
13,650
|
|
||||
|
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville
(3)
|
Fixed
|
6.46
|
%
|
2/1/2018
|
27,775
|
|
27,775
|
|
||||
|
Fairmont Dallas
|
Variable
|
2.29
|
%
|
4/10/2018
|
56,217
|
|
56,892
|
|
||||
|
Residence Inn Denver City Center
|
Variable
|
2.66
|
%
|
4/17/2018
|
45,210
|
|
45,210
|
|
||||
|
Marriott Dallas City Center
|
Variable
|
2.66
|
%
|
5/24/2018
|
40,090
|
|
40,090
|
|
||||
|
Bohemian Hotel Savannah Riverfront
|
Variable
|
2.76
|
%
|
12/17/2018
|
27,480
|
|
27,480
|
|
||||
|
Andaz Savannah
|
Variable
|
2.24
|
%
|
1/14/2019
|
21,500
|
|
21,500
|
|
||||
|
Hotel Monaco Denver
|
Variable
|
2.34
|
%
|
1/17/2019
|
41,000
|
|
41,000
|
|
||||
|
Hotel Monaco Chicago
|
Variable
|
2.59
|
%
|
1/17/2019
|
26,000
|
|
26,000
|
|
||||
|
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara
|
Variable
|
2.41
|
%
|
1/20/2019
|
60,200
|
|
60,200
|
|
||||
|
Loews New Orleans Hotel
|
Variable
|
2.62
|
%
|
2/22/2019
|
37,500
|
|
37,500
|
|
||||
|
Andaz Napa
(4)
|
Variable
|
2.34
|
%
|
3/21/2019
|
38,000
|
|
30,500
|
|
||||
|
Westin Galleria & Oaks Houston
|
Variable
|
2.92
|
%
|
(5)
|
5/1/2019
|
110,000
|
|
110,000
|
|
|||
|
Marriott Charleston Town Center
|
Fixed
|
3.85
|
%
|
7/1/2020
|
16,877
|
|
17,108
|
|
||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston (JV)
|
Variable
|
2.82
|
%
|
11/10/2020
|
19,950
|
|
11,119
|
|
||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook (JV)
|
Variable
|
2.92
|
%
|
12/27/2020
|
25,784
|
|
10,095
|
|
||||
|
Residence Inn Boston Cambridge
(6)
|
Fixed
|
4.48
|
%
|
|
10/28/2025
|
63,000
|
|
30,674
|
|
|||
|
Total Mortgage Loans
|
3.65
|
%
|
(7)
|
956,277
|
|
1,200,688
|
|
|||||
|
Mortgage Loan Premium / (Discounts)
(8)
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
(661
|
)
|
(1,660
|
)
|
||||
|
Unamortized loan costs
(9)
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
(8,305
|
)
|
(6,674
|
)
|
||||
|
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility
|
Variable
|
2.04
|
%
|
2/3/2019
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Term Loan $175M
|
Hedged
|
2.79
|
%
|
2/15/2021
|
175,000
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Term Loan $125M
(10)
|
Hedged
|
3.63
|
%
|
10/22/2022
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
||||
|
Line of Credit Allocation
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
|
96,020
|
|
||||
|
Total Debt
(11)
|
3.51
|
%
|
(7)
|
1,122,311
|
|
1,288,374
|
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Floating index is one month LIBOR.
|
|
(2)
|
Loan balance was repaid with proceeds from the sale of the hotel property in October 2015.
|
F-
24
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
|
(3)
|
The hotel was sold in February 2016, and the related debt was paid off with proceeds from the sale. The balance of the mortgage was included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale as of
December 31, 2015
.
|
|
(4)
|
Obtained incremental proceeds under terms of the mortgage of
$7.5 million
in November 2015.
|
|
(5)
|
The Company modified the terms of the loan in December 2015 to lower the interest rate spread over LIBOR from
3.15%
to
2.50%
and to extend the prepayment provision.
|
|
(6)
|
In October 2015, Company refinanced the mortgage with a new loan bearing a
4.48%
fixed interest rate and October 2025 maturity. Additional proceeds of
$33 million
were received under the refinanced terms of the mortgage.
|
|
(7)
|
Weighted average interest rate as of
December 31, 2015
.
|
|
(8)
|
Loan premiums/(discounts) on assumed mortgages recorded in purchase accounting.
|
|
(9)
|
See Note 2 for further discussion on the adoption of ASU 2015-03.
|
|
(10)
|
Funded
$125 million
in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth.
|
|
(11)
|
Includes the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville mortgage of
$27.8 million
that is included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale on the combined consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.
|
In connection with repaying mortgage loans during the year, the Company incurred prepayment and extinguishment fees of approximately
$5.3 million
which is included in the loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended
December 31, 2015
. The loss from extinguishment of debt represents the unamortized deferred financing costs incurred when the original agreements were executed and termination penalty payments.
Debt outstanding as of
December 31, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
was
$1,131 million
and
$1,201
million and had a weighted average interest rate of
3.51%
and
3.96%
per annum, respectively. Mortgage premiums and discounts was a net
$0.7 million
and
$1.7
million as of
December 31, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
, respectively. The following table shows scheduled debt maturities for the next five years and thereafter (in thousands):
|
As of
December 31, 2015 (1) |
Weighted average
interest rate |
|||||
|
2016
|
$
|
263,734
|
|
5.20%
|
||
|
2017
|
35,959
|
|
4.46%
|
|||
|
2018
|
196,772
|
|
3.10%
|
|||
|
2019
|
334,200
|
|
2.59%
|
|||
|
2020
|
62,612
|
|
3.14%
|
|||
|
Thereafter
|
238,000
|
|
3.24%
|
|||
|
Total
|
1,131,277
|
|
3.51%
|
|||
|
Mortgage premiums and discounts, net
|
(661
|
)
|
—
|
|||
|
Unamortized loan costs
(2)
|
(8,305
|
)
|
—
|
|||
|
Senior unsecured credit facility (maturing in 2019)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|||
|
Total Debt
|
$
|
1,122,311
|
|
3.51%
|
||
|
(1)
|
Includes the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville mortgage of
$27.8 million
that is included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale on the combined consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
See Note 2 for further discussion on the adoption of ASU 2015-03.
|
Of the total outstanding debt at
December 31, 2015
, approximately
$23.1 million
is recourse to the Company. Certain loans have options to extend the maturity dates if exercised by the Company, subject to being compliant with certain covenants and the prepayment of an extension fee. We expect to repay refinance or extend our maturing debt as it becomes due.
Term Loan Facilities
In October 2015, the Company executed a
$175 million
unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in February 2021. Simultaneously with the closing of the
$175 million
unsecured term loan, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at
1.29%
for the entire term of the loan, for a combined rate of
2.79%
as of December 31, 2015. A portion of the proceeds from the
$175 million
unsecured term loan was
F-
25
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
used to pay off the outstanding balance on the unsecured revolving credit facility and the remaining proceeds were used to pay off
one
property level mortgage with a principal balance of
$53 million
.
Additionally in October 2015, the Company executed a
$125 million
unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in October 2022. In December 2015, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at
1.83%
for the entire term of the loan, for a combined rate of
3.63%
as of December 31, 2015. The
$125 million
unsecured term loan was funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth.
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility
Prior to the consummation of the spin-off transaction, the Company was allocated
$96.0 million
of InvenTrust's revolving credit facility. Effective February 3, 2015, this allocation was terminated and the Company entered into a new
$400 million
senior unsecured credit facility with a syndicate of banks. The new revolving credit facility includes an uncommitted accordion feature which, subject to certain conditions, allows the Company to increase the aggregate availability by up to an additional
$350 million
. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on LIBOR plus a margin ranging from
1.50%
to
2.45%
(or, at the Company's election upon achievement of an investment grade rating from Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, interest based on LIBOR plus a margin ranging from
0.875%
to
1.50%
). In addition, until such election, the Company expects to pay an unused commitment fee of up to
0.30%
of the unused portion of the credit facility based on the average daily unused portion of the credit facility; thereafter, the Company expects to pay a facility fee ranging between
0.125%
and
0.35%
based on the Company's debt rating.
As of
December 31, 2015
, there was
no
outstanding balance on the senior unsecured facility. During the
year ended
December 31, 2015
the Company incurred unused fees of approximately
$1.0 million
. As of
March 1, 2016
, there was
no
outstanding balance on the senior unsecured credit facility.
Financial Covenants
Our senior unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loan agreements contain a number of covenants that restrict our ability to incur debt in excess of calculated amounts, restrict our ability to make distributions under certain circumstances and generally require us to maintain certain financial ratios.
Failure of the Company to comply with the financial covenants contained in its credit facilities, unsecured term loans and non-recourse secured mortgages could result from, among other things, changes in its results of operations, the incurrence of additional debt or changes in general economic conditions.
If the Company violates the financial covenants contained in any of its credit facility, unsecured term loans or mortgages described above, the Company may attempt to negotiate waivers of the violations or amend the terms of the applicable credit facilities, unsecured term loans or mortgages with the lenders thereunder; however, the Company can make no assurance that it would be successful in any such negotiations or that, if successful in obtaining waivers or amendments, such amendments or waivers would be on terms attractive to the Company. If a default under the credit facilities or unsecured term loans were to occur, the Company would possibly have to refinance the debt through additional debt financing, private or public offerings of debt securities, or equity financings. If the Company is unable to refinance its debt on acceptable terms, including at maturity of the credit facility, unsecured term loans, or mortgages it may be forced to dispose of hotel properties on disadvantageous terms, potentially resulting in losses that reduce cash flow from operating activities. If, at the time of any refinancing, prevailing interest rates or other factors result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, increases in interest expense would lower the Company’s cash flow, and, consequently, cash available for distribution to its stockholders.
A cash trap associated with a mortgage loan may limit the overall liquidity for the Company as cash from the hotel securing such mortgage would not be available for the Company to use. If the Company is unable to meet mortgage payment obligations, including the payment obligation upon maturity of the mortgage borrowing, the mortgage securing the specific property could be foreclosed upon by, or the property could be otherwise transferred to, the mortgagee with a consequent loss of income and asset value to the Company.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company is in compliance with all debt covenants, current on all loan payments and not otherwise in default under the credit facility, unsecured term loans or mortgage loans.
F-
26
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
9
.
Derivatives
The Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, unrealized gains and losses on the effective portion are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. Unrealized gains and losses on the ineffective portion of all designated hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period. At December 31, 2015, all derivative instruments were designated as cash flow hedges.
At December 31, 2015, the aggregate fair value of interest rate swap assets of
$1.8 million
was included in other assets in the accompanying combined consolidated balance sheet and the aggregate fair value of interest rate swap liabilities of
$0.3 million
was included in other liabilities in the accompanying combined consolidated balance sheet. For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, the Company had an unrealized gain of
$1.5 million
that is included in the statement of operations and comprehensive income. The Company did not reclass any amounts out of comprehensive income to net income during the year ended
December 31, 2015
. There were
no
outstanding derivatives instruments for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The following table summarizes the terms of the derivative financial instruments held by the Company and the asset (liability) that has been recorded (in thousands):
|
Hedged Debt
|
Type
|
Fixed Rate
|
Index
|
Effective Date
|
Maturity
|
Notional Amounts
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||
|
$175M Term Loan
|
Swap
|
1.30%
|
1-Month LIBOR + 1.50%
|
10/22/2015
|
2/15/2021
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
$
|
604
|
|
|||||||
|
$175M Term Loan
|
Swap
|
1.29%
|
1-Month LIBOR + 1.50%
|
10/22/2015
|
2/15/2021
|
65,000
|
|
817
|
|
|||||||||
|
$175M Term Loan
|
Swap
|
1.29%
|
1-Month LIBOR + 1.50%
|
10/22/2015
|
2/15/2021
|
60,000
|
|
754
|
|
|||||||||
|
$125M Term Loan
|
Swap
|
1.83%
|
1-Month LIBOR + 1.80%
|
1/15/2016
|
10/22/2022
|
50,000
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
$125M Term Loan
|
Swap
|
1.83%
|
1-Month LIBOR + 1.80%
|
1/15/2016
|
10/22/2022
|
25,000
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
$125M Term Loan
|
Swap
|
1.84%
|
1-Month LIBOR + 1.80%
|
1/15/2016
|
10/22/2022
|
25,000
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
$125M Term Loan
|
Swap
|
1.83%
|
1-Month LIBOR + 1.80%
|
1/15/2016
|
10/22/2022
|
25,000
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
(1)
|
There were
no
amounts recognized in earnings related to hedge ineffectiveness or amounts excluded from hedge ineffectiveness testing during the year ended December 31, 2015.
|
10
.
Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures, the Company defines fair value based on the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below:
|
•
|
Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 - Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
|
The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial and non-financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies it believes to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that would be realized upon disposition.
F-
27
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
Recurring Measurements
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, quantitative disclosure of their fair value is as follows (in thousands):
|
Fair Value Measurement Date
|
||||
|
December 31, 2015
|
||||
|
Description
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 2)
|
|||
|
Assets
|
||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
$
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
(277
|
)
|
||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
The fair value of each derivative instrument is based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the expected cash flows under each arrangement. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative instrument, including the period to maturity, and utilizes observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities, which are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company also incorporates credit value adjustments to appropriately reflect each parties’ nonperformance risk in the fair value measurement, which utilizes level 3 inputs such as estimates of current credit spreads. However, the Company has assessed that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Non-Recurring Measurements
Investment Properties
During the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, the Company recorded an impairment of investment properties of
$0
and
$5.4 million
, respectively, which is included in the provision for asset impairment on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.
The following table summarizes activity for the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, respectively (in thousands):
|
Fair Value at Measurement Date
|
||||||||
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
|||||||
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||
|
Investment properties
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
17,200
|
|
||
|
Total
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
17,200
|
|
||
During the
year ended
December 31, 2014
, the Company identified
two
hotel properties which had a reduction in their expected holding period and reviewed the probability of the assets' disposition. The Company recorded an impairment of investment properties of
$5.4
million for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
based on the estimated fair value using letters of intent, purchase contracts and average selling costs. The properties were subsequently sold in August and November 2014.
F-
28
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value
The table below represents the fair value of financial instruments presented at carrying values in the combined consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
(in thousands):
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
||||||||||||||
|
Carrying Value
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
Carrying Value
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Debt
|
$
|
1,130,616
|
|
$
|
1,137,149
|
|
$
|
1,199,028
|
|
$
|
1,194,237
|
|
||||
|
Unsecured credit facility
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
96,020
|
|
$
|
96,020
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
1,130,616
|
|
$
|
1,137,149
|
|
$
|
1,295,048
|
|
$
|
1,290,257
|
|
||||
The Company estimates the fair value of its mortgages payable using a weighted average effective interest rate of
3.48%
and
3.96%
per annum as of
December 31, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value estimate of the unsecured term loan approximated the carrying value. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value estimate of the unsecured credit facility approximated the carrying value. The assumptions reflect the terms currently available on similar borrowing terms to borrowers with credit profiles similar to the Company's. The Company has determined that its debt instrument valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
At
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, the carrying amounts of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments and the recent acquisition of these items.
11
.
Income Taxes
During the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, the Company recognized income expense of
$6.3
million, of which
$1.9 million
of the expense for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
related to taxes on a one-time gain on the transfer of a hotel resulting in a more optimal structure in connection with the Company’s intention to elect to be taxed as a REIT. The Company's effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate predominately due to the dividends paid deduction, state income taxes, and changes to valuation allowances. During the years ended
December 31, 2014
and 2013, the Company recognized
$5.9 million
and
$3.6 million
income tax expense, respectively, which was calculated on a "carve-out" basis from InvenTrust. During the years ended
December 31, 2014
and 2013, the Company also recognized income tax expense of
$4.6 million
and an income tax benefit of
$0.4 million
, respectively, related to the operations of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, which was included in discontinued operations.
The Company elected to be taxed as, and has operated in a manner that will allow the Company to qualify as, a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") for federal income tax purposes. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its net taxable income that is currently distributed to its stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distributes at least
90%
of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal and state income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company also may be subject to certain federal, state, and local taxes on its income and assets, including (1) alternative minimum taxes, (2) taxes on any undistributed income, (3) taxes related to its taxable REIT subsidiaries, (4) certain state or local income taxes, (5) franchise taxes, (6) property taxes, and (7) transfer taxes.
It is the Company's current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company's qualification for taxation as a REIT.
The Company has elected to treat certain of its consolidated subsidiaries, and may in the future elect to treat newly formed subsidiaries, as taxable REIT subsidiaries pursuant to the Code. Taxable REIT subsidiaries may participate in non-real estate related activities and/or perform non-customary services for tenants and are subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate tax rates. The Company’s hotels are leased to certain of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. Lease revenue from these taxable REIT subsidiaries and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation for financial statement purposes.
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, 100% of the distributions made to stockholders were taxable ordinary income for federal tax purposes.
F-
29
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
The (provision) benefit for income taxes related to continuing operations consists of the following:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Current:
|
|||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
(4,028
|
)
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
$
|
(709
|
)
|
||
|
State
|
(2,178
|
)
|
(1,102
|
)
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total current
|
$
|
(6,206
|
)
|
$
|
(2,442
|
)
|
$
|
(1,934
|
)
|
||
|
Deferred:
|
|||||||||||
|
Federal
|
$
|
(471
|
)
|
$
|
(3,303
|
)
|
$
|
(1,501
|
)
|
||
|
State
|
382
|
|
(120
|
)
|
(184
|
)
|
|||||
|
Total deferred
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
$
|
(3,423
|
)
|
$
|
(1,685
|
)
|
||
|
Total tax provision
|
$
|
(6,295
|
)
|
$
|
(5,865
|
)
|
$
|
(3,619
|
)
|
||
|
Total tax (provision) benefit attributable to discontinued operations
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(4,568
|
)
|
$
|
413
|
|
||
Below is a reconciliation between the benefit (provision) for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to the income or loss for continuing operations before income taxes:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Book Income before Taxes
|
$
|
95,426
|
|
$
|
40,544
|
|
$
|
(42,223
|
)
|
||||||||
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes at statutory rate
|
(33,393
|
)
|
35.00
|
%
|
(14,199
|
)
|
35.00
|
%
|
14,778
|
|
35.00
|
%
|
|||||
|
Tax benefit related to REIT operations
|
27,783
|
|
(28.68
|
)%
|
8,786
|
|
(21.66
|
)%
|
(17,241
|
)
|
(40.83
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Income for which no federal tax benefit was recognized
|
(1,930
|
)
|
2.17
|
%
|
(3,092
|
)
|
7.62
|
%
|
(617
|
)
|
(1.46
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Valuation allowances
|
2,752
|
|
(3.10
|
)%
|
3,496
|
|
(8.62
|
)%
|
117
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|||||
|
State tax (provision) benefit, net of federal
|
(1,706
|
)
|
1.92
|
%
|
(1,015
|
)
|
2.50
|
%
|
(642
|
)
|
(1.52
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Other
|
199
|
|
(0.22
|
)%
|
159
|
|
(0.39
|
)%
|
(14
|
)
|
(0.03
|
)%
|
|||||
|
Total Tax Expense
|
$
|
(6,295
|
)
|
7.09
|
%
|
$
|
(5,865
|
)
|
14.45
|
%
|
$
|
(3,619
|
)
|
(8.56
|
)%
|
||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included within deferred costs and other assets and other liabilities in the combined consolidated balance sheets, respectively, and are attributed to the activity of the Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at
December 31, 2015 and 2014
were as follows:
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
|
Net operating loss
|
$
|
5,063
|
|
$
|
6,471
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
1,567
|
|
1,833
|
|
|||
|
Basis difference on property
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||
|
Depreciation expense
|
—
|
|
1,066
|
|
|||
|
Miscellaneous
|
100
|
|
201
|
|
|||
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
6,730
|
|
9,571
|
|
|||
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
(4,426
|
)
|
(7,178
|
)
|
|||
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
$
|
2,304
|
|
$
|
2,393
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2015
, the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$11.2 million
and
$25.3 million
, respectively which begin to expire in 2023. Of the Company's U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards,
$11.2 million
are subject to limitation and the Company has established a valuation allowance against such amounts.
Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income, and tax-planning strategies. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is
F-
30
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company has considered various factors, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment.
Based upon tax-planning strategies and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance of
$4.4 million
, at
December 31, 2015
. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
During 2015 the Company reversed
$2.8 million
of valuation allowance associated with certain deferred tax assets generated by deferred income. In connection with the utilization of all non-limited U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards, the Company has determined that such difference will be fully realized.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company had
no
unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the three year period ended
December 31, 2015
. The Company expects no significant increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits due to changes in tax positions within one year of
December 31, 2015
. The Company has no material interest or penalties relating to income taxes recognized in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
or in the combined consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
. As of
December 31, 2015
, the Company’s 2015, 2014, and 2013 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. and various state tax jurisdictions.
12
.
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to
50
million shares of preferred stock,
0.01
par value per share. On January 5, 2015, the Company issued
125
shares of preferred stock of the Company, designated as
12.5%
Series A Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock,
$0.01
par value per share, with a liquidation preference of
$1,000
per share (the "Series A Preferred Stock"), in a private placement to approximately
125
investors who qualify as "accredited investors" (as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act")) for an aggregate purchase price of
$125
thousand.
On September 30, 2015, the Company redeemed its
125
outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Operating Partnership redeemed its
125
outstanding units of the Series A Preferred Units, for
$1,100.00
per share/unit plus accrued and unpaid dividends of
$31.25
per share/unit, including a
$100.00
redemption premium, for an aggregate per share/unit redemption of
$1,131.25
. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock ceased accruing on September 30, 2015.
Following the redemption, in accordance with the Company’s charter, the Board of Directors of the Company reclassified the unissued shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock as authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock without designation as to series.
Common Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to
500
million shares of its Common Stock,
$0.01
par value per share. On February 3, 2015, the Company spun off from InvenTrust, its former parent, through a taxable pro rata distribution by InvenTrust of
95%
of the Common Stock as of the close of business on January 20, 2015. Each holder of record of InvenTrust's common stock received one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust's common stock held at the close of business on the Record Date. In lieu of fractional shares, stockholders of InvenTrust received cash. On February 4, 2015, Xenia’s Common Stock began trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "XHR." As a result of the spin-off, the Company became a stand-alone, publicly-traded company.
On February 4, 2015, in conjunction with the listing of the Company's common stock on the NYSE, the Company commenced a modified "Dutch Auction" self-tender offer (the "Tender Offer") to purchase for cash up to
$125 million
in value of shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price not greater than
$21.00
nor less than
$19.00
per share, net to the seller in cash, less any applicable withholding of taxes and without interest. The Tender Offer expired on March 5, 2015. As a result of the Tender Offer, the Company accepted for purchase
1,759,344
shares of its Common Stock at a purchase price of
$21.00
per share, for an aggregate purchase price of
$36.9
million (excluding fees and expenses relating to the Tender Offer), which was funded from
F-
31
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
cash on hand. The
1,759,344
shares of Common Stock accepted for purchase in the Tender Offer represented approximately
1.6%
of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 3, 2015, the last day prior to the commencement of the Tender Offer. Stockholders who properly tendered and did not properly withdraw shares of Common Stock in the Tender Offer at or below the final purchase price of
$21.00
per share had all of their tendered shares of Common Stock purchased by the Company at
$21.00
per share.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the Company had
111,671,372
shares of Common Stock outstanding.
Distributions
Common Stock
The Company paid the following dividends on common Stock during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
:
|
Dividend per Share/Unit
(1)
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
Record Date
|
Payable Date
|
||||
|
$0.15
|
(2)
|
March 31, 2015
|
March 31, 2015
|
April 15, 2015
|
|||
|
$0.23
|
June 30, 2015
|
June 30, 2015
|
July 15, 2015
|
||||
|
$0.23
|
September 30, 2015
|
September 30, 2015
|
October 15, 2015
|
||||
|
$0.23
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2015
|
January 15, 2016
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Amounts are rounded to the nearest whole cent for presentation purposes
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the Company's anticipated regular quarterly dividend of
$0.23
per share, prorated for the period from February 3, 2015 through March 31, 2015.
|
Preferred Stock
The Company paid the following dividends on its
12.5%
Series A preferred stock during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
:
|
Dividend per Share
|
For the Period
|
Record Date
|
Payable Date
|
||||
|
$61.11
|
(1)
|
June 30, 2015
|
June 15, 2015
|
June 30, 2015
|
|||
|
$31.25
|
(2)
|
September 30, 2015
|
September 30, 2015
|
September 30, 2015
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Represents the Company's anticipated regular semi-annual dividend of
$62.50
per share, prorated for the period from February 5, 2015 through June 30, 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents the Company's anticipated regular semi-annual dividend of
$62.50
per share prorated for the period from July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015. This dividend was paid in connection with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock on September 30, 2015, and constitutes accrued but unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock as of the redemption date.
|
Non-controlling Interest of Common Units in Operating Partnership
As of
December 31, 2015
, the Operating Partnership had
521,450
long-term incentive partnership units ("LTIP units") outstanding,
representing a
0.5%
partnership interest held by the limited partners
. Of the
521,450
LTIP units outstanding at
December 31, 2015
,
23,401
units had vested. Only vested LTIP units may be converted to common units of the Operating Partnership, which in turn can be tendered for redemption as described below in the Note 14.
As of
December 31, 2015
, the Company accrued
$34 thousand
in dividends related to the LTIP units, which were paid in January 2016.
Stock Repurchase Program
In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program (the "Repurchase Program") pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to
$100 million
of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value
$0.01
, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program.
F-
32
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
13
.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus any shares that could potentially be outstanding during the period. Any anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation.
Unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Accordingly, distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to unvested share-based compensation (participating securities) have been excluded, as applicable, from net income or loss available to common stockholders used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. Net income or loss figures are presented net of non-controlling interests in the earnings per share calculations.
For periods prior to the spin-off, basic and diluted earnings per share was calculated by dividing net income attributable to the Company by the
113.4 million
shares of Common Stock outstanding upon the completion of the spin-off (based on a distribution ratio of one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust common stock).
The following table reconciles net income to basic and diluted EPS (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
||||||||
|
Numerator:
|
|||||||||||
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
89,131
|
|
$
|
34,679
|
|
$
|
(45,842
|
)
|
||
|
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
116
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends, preferred shares
|
(12
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Dividends, unvested share-based compensation
|
(132
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations available to common stockholders
|
89,103
|
|
34,679
|
|
(45,842
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(489
|
)
|
75,120
|
|
(5,626
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
$
|
88,614
|
|
$
|
109,799
|
|
$
|
(51,468
|
)
|
||
|
Denominator:
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic
|
111,989,686
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||
|
Effect of dilutive share-based compensation
|
148,537
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted
|
112,138,223
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
113,397,997
|
|
|||||
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
||
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
||
|
Net earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
||
14
.
Share Based Compensation
2014 Share Unit Plan
On September 17, 2014, the board of directors of InvenTrust and the Company’s Board of Directors adopted and ratified the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan (the "2014 Share Unit Plan"). The 2014 Share Unit Plan provided for the grant of notional "share unit" awards to eligible participants. Refer to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10, filed on January 9, 2015, as amended, for additional information regarding the 2014 Share Unit Plan. The 2015 Incentive Award Plan, as defined below, replaced the 2014 Share Unit Plan in connection with the Company’s separation from InvenTrust, and the 2014 Share Unit Plan was terminated in connection with the implementation of the 2015 Incentive Award Plan. Awards outstanding under the 2014 Share Unit Plan at the time of its termination will remain outstanding in accordance with their terms, and the terms and conditions of the 2014 Share Unit Plan will continue to govern such awards.
F-
33
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
During 2014, InvenTrust and the Company granted share units to certain members of management, the vesting of which was conditioned upon a triggering event, such as a listing or a change in control (the "2014 Share Unit Grants"). A triggering event occurred in February 2015 upon the completion of the spin-off of the Company. As of
December 31, 2015
,
172,842
of the 2014 Share Unit Grants were outstanding to certain members of management that vest annually over a
three
year period and are based on continued employment. Additionally, as of
December 31, 2015
,
169,377
of the 2014 Share Unit Grants were outstanding to certain members of management that cliff vest in March 2017 and are based on continued employment. Each 2014 Share Unit Grant is convertible to
one
unit of Common Stock upon vesting.
2015 Incentive Award Plan
On January 9, 2015, the Company adopted, and InvenTrust as its sole common stockholder approved, the Company's 2015 Incentive Award Plan (the "2015 Incentive Award Plan") effective as of February 2, 2015 (the date prior to the date of the Company's separation from InvenTrust), under which the Company may grant cash and equity incentive awards to eligible service providers in order to attract, motivate and retain the talent for which the Company competes. Refer to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10, filed on January 9, 2015, as amended, for additional information regarding the 2015 Incentive Award Plan. The plan allows for the grant of both share-based awards relating to the Company's common stock and partnership units ("LTIP units") in the Operating Partnership.
In February 2015, the Board of Directors and certain members of management were granted
25,988
fully vested shares of Common Stock which had a weighted average grant date fair value of
$20.55
per share.
Share Unit Grants
Between May 5, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Compensation Committee ("the Compensation Committee") of the Board of Directors of the Company granted share units to certain members of management (the "2015 Share Unit Grants"). The 2015 Share Unit Grants include
67,669
share units that are time-based and vest over a
three
year period, and
17,032
share units that are performance based. Both the time-based and performance-based units are subject to continued employment and have a weighted average grant date fair value of
$20.18
per share.
Of the performance-based 2015 Share Unit Grants, twenty-five percent (
25%
) are designated as absolute total stockholder return ("TSR") units (the "Absolute TSR Share Units"), and vest based on varying levels of the Company’s TSR over the defined performance period. The other seventy-five percent (
75%
) of the performance-based 2015 Share Unit Grants are designated as relative TSR share units (the "Relative TSR Share Units") and vest based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR as compared to its defined peer group over the defined performance period.
LTIP Unit Grants
LTIP Units are a class of limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership. Initially the LTIP Units do not have full parity with common units of the Operating Partnership with respect to liquidating distributions. However, upon the occurrence of certain events described in the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement, the LTIP Units can over time achieve
full parity with the common units for all purposes. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP Units may be converted into an equal number of common units on a one for one basis at any time at the request of the LTIP Unit holder or the general partner of the Operating Partnership. Common units are redeemable for cash based on the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, or, at the election of the Company, an equal number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, each subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, specified extraordinary distributions or similar events.
In May 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the issuance of
409,874
performance-based LTIP Units (the "Class A LTIP Units") and
88,175
time-based LTIP Units (the "Time-Based LTIP Units") of the Operating Partnership under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan that had a weighted average grant date fair value of
$14.10
per unit.
Each award of Time-Based LTIP Units will vest as follows, subject to the executive’s continued service through each applicable vesting date:
33%
on February 4, 2016, the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date of the award (February 4, 2015),
33%
on the second anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and
34%
on the third anniversary of the vesting commencement date.
A portion of each award of Class A LTIP Units is designated as a number of "base units." Twenty-five percent (
25%
) of the base units are designated as absolute TSR base units, and vest based on varying levels of the Company’s TSR over the defined performance period. The other seventy-five percent (
75%
) of the base units are designated as relative TSR base units and vest based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR as compared to its defined peer group over the defined performance period.
F-
34
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
In June 2015, pursuant to the Company's Director Compensation Program, as amended and restated as of May 29, 2015, the Company approved the issuance of an aggregate of
23,401
fully vested LTIP Units of the Operating Partnership under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan to the Company's
seven
non-employee directors upon election to our Board of Directors with a weighted average grant date fair value of
$22.44
per share.
LTIP Units (other than Class A LTIP Units that have not vested), whether vested or not, receive the same quarterly per-unit distributions as common units in the Operating Partnership, which equal the per-share distributions on the common stock of the Company. Class A LTIP Units that have not vested receive a quarterly per-unit distribution equal to
10%
of the distribution paid on common units in the Operating Partnership.
The following is a summary of the non-vested incentive awards under the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan as of
December 31, 2015
:
|
2014 Share Unit Plan Share Units
|
2015 Incentive Award Plan Share Units
|
2015 Incentive Award Plan LTIP Units
(1)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
Outstanding as of January 1, 2015
|
817,640
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
817,640
|
|
|||||||
|
Adjustment for final units at spin-off date
|
(462,959
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(462,959
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
84,701
|
|
521,450
|
|
606,151
|
|
|||||||
|
Vested
|
(8,977
|
)
|
—
|
|
(23,401
|
)
|
(32,378
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Expired
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||||
|
Forfeited
|
(3,485
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(3,485
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
|
342,219
|
|
84,701
|
|
498,049
|
|
924,969
|
|
|||||||
|
Vested as of December 31, 2015
|
8,977
|
|
—
|
|
23,401
|
|
32,378
|
|
|||||||
|
Weighted average fair value of outstanding shares/units
|
$
|
20.19
|
|
$
|
20.18
|
|
$
|
16.26
|
|
$
|
18.06
|
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Includes Time-Based LTIP Units and Class A LTIP Units.
|
The fair value of the time-based awards is determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date and compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The grant date fair value of performance awards was determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation method with the following assumptions and compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the performance period:
|
Performance Award Grant Date
|
Percentage of Total Award
|
Grant Date Fair Value by Component ($ in thousands)
|
Volatility
|
Interest Rate
|
Dividend Yield
|
|||||
|
May 5, 2015
|
||||||||||
|
Absolute TSR RSU's
|
25%
|
$40.5
|
26.85%
|
0.09% - 1.05%
|
4.25%
|
|||||
|
Relative TSR RSU's
|
75%
|
$206.4
|
26.85%
|
0.09% - 1.05%
|
4.25%
|
|||||
|
Absolute TSR Class A LTIPs
|
25%
|
$838.5
|
26.85%
|
0.09% - 1.05%
|
4.25%
|
|||||
|
Relative TSR Class A LTIPs
|
75%
|
$4,274.7
|
26.85%
|
0.09% - 1.05%
|
4.25%
|
|||||
The absolute and relative stockholder returns are market conditions as defined by ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation. Market conditions include provisions wherein the vesting condition is met through the achievement of a specific value of the Company’s common stock, which is total stockholder return, in this case. Market conditions differ from other performance awards under ASC 718 in that the probability of attaining the condition (and thus vesting in the shares) is reflected in the initial grant date fair value of the award. Accordingly, it is not appropriate to reconsider the probability of vesting in the award subsequent to the initial measurement of the award, nor is it appropriate to reverse any of the expense if the condition is not met.
F-
35
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
Therefore, once the expense for these awards is measured, the expense must be recognized over the service period regardless of whether the target is met, or at what level the target is met. Expense may only be reversed if the holder of the instrument forfeits the award by leaving the employment of the Company prior to vesting.
For the
year ended
December 31, 2015
, the Company recognized approximately
$1.1 million
, of share-based compensation expense related to vested stock and LTIP Unit payments under the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, of which approximately
$1.1 million
for
year ended
December 31, 2015
was provided to the Board of Directors and approximately
$9 thousand
was provided to certain of the Company's officers.
In addition, in connection with the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, during the
year ended
December 31, 2015
the Company recognized approximately
$5.1 million
, in compensation expense (net of forfeitures) related to share units, Class A LTIP Units and Time-Based LTIP Units provided to certain of its executive officers, other officers and members of management and capitalized approximately
$0.4 million
, related to restricted stock units provided to certain other officers and members of management that oversee development and capital projects on behalf of the Company. Additionally, this includes a cumulative catch up for compensation expenses related to the fourth quarter of 2014 because the effectiveness of the grants was subject to the completion of the spin-off of the Company from InvenTrust, which occurred on February 3, 2015. As of
December 31, 2015
, there was
$10.4 million
of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested restricted share units, Class A LTIP Units and Time Based LTIP Units issued under the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, which are expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of eight additional quarters.
15
.
Commitments and Contingencies
Certain leases and operating agreements require the Company to reserve funds relating to replacements and renewals of the hotels' furniture, fixtures and equipment. As of
December 31, 2015
and
December 31, 2014
, the Company had a balance of
$69.9 million
and
$76.3 million
, respectively, in reserves for such future improvements. This amount is included in restricted cash and escrows on the combined consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2015
.
The Company is subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the Company.
In addition, in connection with the Company's separation from InvenTrust, on August 8, 2014, the Company entered into an Indemnity Agreement, as amended, with InvenTrust pursuant to which InvenTrust has agreed to the fullest extent allowed by law or government regulation, to absolutely, irrevocably and unconditionally indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company and its subsidiaries, directors, officers, agents, representatives and employees (in each case, in such person’s respective capacity as such) and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assignees from and against all losses, including but not limited to "actions" (as defined in the Indemnity Agreement), arising from: (1) the non-public, formal, fact-finding investigation by the SEC as described in InvenTrust's public filings with the SEC (the "SEC Investigation"); (2) the three related demands (including the Derivative Lawsuit described below) received by InvenTrust ("Derivative Demands") from stockholders to conduct investigations regarding claims similar to the matters that are subject to the SEC Investigation and as described in InvenTrust' public filings with the SEC; (3) the derivative lawsuit filed on March 21, 2013 on behalf of InvenTrust by counsel for stockholders who made the first Derivative Demand (the "Derivative Lawsuit"); and (4) the investigation by the Special Litigation Committee of the board of directors of InvenTrust. In each case, regardless of when or where the loss took place, or whether any such loss, claim, accident, occurrence, event or happening is known or unknown, and regardless of whether such loss, claim, accident, occurrence, event or happening giving rise to the loss existed prior to, on or after February 3, 2015, the separation date or relates to, arises out of or results from actions, inactions, events, omissions, conditions, facts or circumstances occurring or existing prior to, on or after February 3, 2015, the separation date.
On March 25, 2015, InvenTrust announced that the SEC had informed InvenTrust that the SEC had concluded its formal, non-public investigation of matters related to InvenTrust. The SEC informed InvenTrust that, based on the information received to date, it did not intend to recommend any enforcement action against InvenTrust.
F-
36
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
Ground Leases
The following table summarizes the remaining primary term, renewal rights, purchase rights and monthly base rent as of
December 31, 2015
associated with land underlying the Company's hotels and meeting facilities that the Company leases from third parties (in thousands):
|
Property
|
Current Lease Term Expiration
|
Renewal Rights / Purchase Rights
|
Current Monthly Minimum or Base Rent
(1)
|
Base Rent Increases at Renewal
|
Lease Type
|
|||||
|
Ground lease: Entire Property
|
||||||||||
|
Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel
|
December 31, 2057
|
No renewal rights
(2)
|
$191
(3)
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara
|
April 30, 2035
|
4 x 10 years,
1 x 9 years (4) |
$60
|
No increase unless lessee exercises its option to expand at which time base rent will be increased by $800 for each additional hotel room in excess of 500
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Marriott Charleston Town Center
|
December 11, 2032
|
4 x 10 years
|
$4
|
No increase unless hotel is expanded beyond 356 guest rooms, at which time rent shall increase on a pro rata basis
(5)
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville
|
March 31, 2073
|
None
|
$3
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Marriott Atlanta Century Center / Emory Area
|
December 31, 2058
|
None
|
$3
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
Ground lease: Partial Property
|
||||||||||
|
Convention Center at Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center
|
June 30, 2100
|
No renewal rights
(6)
|
$10
(7)
|
Not applicable
|
Triple Net
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
In addition to minimum rent, the Company may owe variable incentive rent.
|
|
(2)
|
The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase the property, which must be exercised within 30 days of receiving the third party’s terms from Landlord.
|
|
(3)
|
For and during the period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2029, the Minimum Rent for each year is adjusted based on a calculation tied to the Consumer Price Index. From January 1, 2030 through the remainder of the lease terminating on December 31, 2057, the minimum rent will be redetermined each ten year period. The monthly minimum or base rent in this chart is for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
|
|
(4)
|
The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase all or a portion of certain areas covered by the two separate leases.
|
|
(5)
|
If the hotel is increased from 356 to 500 rooms (unaudited), the new annual base rent will increase to
$72 thousand
.
|
|
(6)
|
The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase the property, which must be exercised within 60 days of receiving the third party’s terms from the landlord.
|
|
(7)
|
The base rent for each year is adjusted based on a calculation tied to the Consumer Price Index. The monthly minimum or base rent in this chart is for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
|
All of the Company's ground leases are accounted for as operating leases. For lease agreements with scheduled rent increases, we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease. During the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
, we recognized ground lease expense of
$5.2 million
,
$5.5 million
, and
$1.9 million
, respectively, which is included in ground lease expense on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
F-
37
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
As of
December 31, 2015
, future minimum ground lease payments are as follows (in thousands):
|
2016
|
$
|
3,276
|
|
|
|
2017
|
3,276
|
|
||
|
2018
|
3,276
|
|
||
|
2019
|
3,276
|
|
||
|
2020
|
3,276
|
|
||
|
Thereafter
|
109,530
|
|
||
|
Total
|
$
|
125,910
|
|
|
16
.
Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
In September 2014, InvenTrust entered into a purchase agreement to sell the Suburban Select Service Portfolio for
$1,100 million
. The sale closed in a single transaction on
November 17, 2014
with a gross disposition price of
$1,071 million
, with net proceeds from the sale resulting in a gain. The operating results of
the Suburban Select Service Portfolio f
or the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
are included in the Company's combined consolidated financial statements as part of discontinued operations in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08, as it represented a strategic shift and had a major effect on the Company's results of operations.
In October 2015, the Company sold the Hyatt Regency Orange County hotel for a purchase price of
$137 million
and received net proceeds of
$70.6 million
, after paying off the
$61.9 million
outstanding property level mortgage at the time of the sale.
The operating results of
the hotel f
or the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
are included in the Company's combined consolidated financial statements as part of continuing operations in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08, as it did not represent a strategic shift or have a major effect on the Company's results of operations. The assets and liabilities of the hotel are included in assets and liabilities associated with assets held for sale at their respective net book values on the accompanying combined consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2014
.
In November 2015, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement for the
Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville hotel for purchase price of
$36 million
, excluding closing costs. The sale of the hotel closed in February 2016.
The operating results of
the hotel f
or the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
are included in the Company's combined consolidated financial statements as part of continuing operations in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08, as it did not represent a strategic shift or have a major effect on the Company's results of operations. The assets and liabilities of the hotel are included in assets and liabilities associated with assets held for sale at their respective net book values on the accompanying combined consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
.
The major classes of assets and liabilities associated with the held for sale assets as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014
are as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2015
|
December 31, 2014
|
|||||||
|
Land
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
18,688
|
|
||
|
Building and other improvements
|
56,861
|
|
177,866
|
|
||||
|
Total
|
$
|
56,861
|
|
$
|
196,554
|
|
||
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(22,353
|
)
|
(63,104
|
)
|
||||
|
Net investment properties
|
$
|
34,508
|
|
$
|
133,450
|
|
||
|
Restricted cash and escrows
|
305
|
|
305
|
|
||||
|
Accounts and rents receivable, net
|
336
|
|
2,482
|
|
||||
|
Deferred costs and other assets
|
303
|
|
1,374
|
|
||||
|
Total assets
|
$
|
35,452
|
|
$
|
137,611
|
|
||
|
Debt
|
$
|
27,775
|
|
$
|
90,811
|
|
||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
806
|
|
5,604
|
|
||||
|
Other liabilities
|
82
|
|
658
|
|
||||
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
28,663
|
|
$
|
97,073
|
|
||
F-
38
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
17
.
Subsequent Events
On January 15, 2016, the Company closed on the purchase of the Hotel Commonwealth Boston for a purchase price of
$136 million
, excluding closing costs. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a nonrefundable deposit of
$20 million
, which is included in other assets on the combined consolidated balance sheet that was applied to the purchase price at closing.
Also in January 2016, the Company closed on a hotel level mortgage for one hotel property in the amount of
$60 million
, an interest rate of
2.60%
and matures on January 13, 2023.
Simultaneously with the closing of the mortgage loan, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at
1.54%
for the entire term of the loan.
In February 2016, the Company closed on the sale of the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville hotel for a sale price of
$36 million
. The hotel level mortgage of
$27.8 million
was repaid with proceeds from the sale upon closing.
Also in February 2016, the Company refinanced a hotel mortgage for one hotel property that matured in 2016 to extend the maturity date an additional term of
10
years, decreased the interest rate from
5.82%
to
4.53%
. The Company received additional proceeds of
$10 million
under the terms of the refinance, which increased the principal of the loan from
$49 million
to
$60 million
.
In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Repurchase Program pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to
$100 million
of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value
$0.01
, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program.
From January 1, 2016 through
March 1, 2016
, the Company repurchased
2,813,292
shares of common stock at a weighted average price of
$14.27
per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$40.2 million
. As of
March 1, 2016
, the Company had approximately
$59.8 million
remaining under its share repurchase authorization.
18
.
Quarterly Operating Results (unaudited)
The following represents the results of operations, for each quarterly period, during the years ended December 31,
2015
and
2014
(in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
First Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
227,874
|
|
$
|
251,223
|
|
$
|
248,453
|
|
$
|
248,594
|
|
$
|
976,144
|
|
||||
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
(14,377
|
)
|
23,750
|
|
17,847
|
|
61,911
|
|
89,131
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
(489
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
|
—
|
|
(3
|
)
|
251
|
|
(132
|
)
|
116
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company
|
(14,866
|
)
|
23,747
|
|
18,098
|
|
61,779
|
|
88,758
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
(14,866
|
)
|
23,739
|
|
18,094
|
|
61,779
|
|
88,746
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended December 31, 2014
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
First Quarter
|
Second Quarter
|
Third Quarter
|
Fourth Quarter
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
218,525
|
|
$
|
247,112
|
|
$
|
231,091
|
|
$
|
229,938
|
|
$
|
926,666
|
|
||||
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
6,687
|
|
20,000
|
|
6,198
|
|
1,794
|
|
34,679
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
(4,368
|
)
|
2,884
|
|
3,297
|
|
73,307
|
|
75,120
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to the Company
|
2,319
|
|
22,884
|
|
9,495
|
|
75,101
|
|
109,799
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
2,319
|
|
22,884
|
|
9,495
|
|
75,101
|
|
109,799
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net income per share available to common stockholders, basic and diluted
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
||||
F-
39
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Schedule III
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
December 31, 2015
|
|
Initial Cost (A)
|
|
|
Gross amount at which carried at end of period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Property
|
Encumbrance
|
Land
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
Adjustments to Land Basis (C)
|
Adjustments to Basis (C)
|
Land and Improvements
|
Buildings and Improvements(D)
|
Total (D,E)
|
Accumulated Depreciation(D,F)
|
Year of Original Construction
|
Date of Acquisition
|
Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Andaz Napa Valley
Napa, CA |
$
|
38,000
|
|
$
|
10,150
|
|
$
|
57,012
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
$
|
10,150
|
|
$
|
57,473
|
|
$
|
67,623
|
|
$
|
8,204
|
|
2009
|
9/20/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
||||||||||||
|
Andaz San Diego
San Diego, CA |
—
|
|
6,949
|
|
43,430
|
|
—
|
|
1,275
|
|
6,949
|
|
44,705
|
|
51,654
|
|
6,522
|
|
1914
|
3/4/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Andaz Savannah
Savannah, GA |
21,500
|
|
2,680
|
|
36,212
|
|
—
|
|
434
|
|
2,680
|
|
36,646
|
|
39,326
|
|
3,618
|
|
2009
|
9/10/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel
Honolulu, HI |
—
|
|
—
|
|
171,989
|
|
—
|
|
3,795
|
|
—
|
|
175,784
|
|
175,784
|
|
15,539
|
|
1969
|
2/28/2014
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bohemian Hotel Celebration, an Autograph Collection Hotel
Celebration, FL |
—
|
|
1,232
|
|
19,000
|
|
—
|
|
588
|
|
1,232
|
|
19,588
|
|
20,820
|
|
2,832
|
|
1999
|
2/6/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bohemian Hotel Savannah, an Autograph Collection Hotel
Savannah, GA |
27,480
|
|
2,300
|
|
24,240
|
|
—
|
|
797
|
|
2,300
|
|
25,037
|
|
27,337
|
|
5,088
|
|
2009
|
8/9/2012
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Canary Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA |
—
|
|
22,361
|
|
57,822
|
|
—
|
|
139
|
|
22,361
|
|
57,961
|
|
80,322
|
|
1,113
|
|
2005
|
7/16/2015
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB
Birmingham, AL |
13,353
|
|
—
|
|
20,810
|
|
1,552
|
|
2,198
|
|
1,552
|
|
23,008
|
|
24,560
|
|
9,644
|
|
2005
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Courtyard Fort Worth Downtown/Blackstone
Fort Worth, TX |
—
|
|
774
|
|
45,820
|
|
—
|
|
5,513
|
|
774
|
|
51,333
|
|
52,107
|
|
19,903
|
|
1929
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Courtyard Kansas City Country Club Plaza
Kansas City, MO |
—
|
|
3,426
|
|
16,349
|
|
—
|
|
3,702
|
|
3,426
|
|
20,051
|
|
23,477
|
|
8,735
|
|
1926
|
7/1/2007
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown
Pittsburgh, PA |
22,607
|
|
2,700
|
|
33,086
|
|
—
|
|
2,427
|
|
2,700
|
|
35,513
|
|
38,213
|
|
9,514
|
|
1898/1902
|
5/11/2010
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel
Washington, DC |
—
|
|
25,857
|
|
56,964
|
|
—
|
|
3,686
|
|
25,857
|
|
60,650
|
|
86,507
|
|
22,625
|
|
1960
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Embassy Suites Baltimore North/Hunt Valley
Hunt Valley, MD |
—
|
|
2,429
|
|
38,927
|
|
—
|
|
5,211
|
|
2,429
|
|
44,138
|
|
46,567
|
|
18,809
|
|
1985
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fairmont Dallas
Dallas, TX |
56,217
|
|
8,700
|
|
60,634
|
|
—
|
|
14,922
|
|
8,700
|
|
75,556
|
|
84,256
|
|
21,639
|
|
1968
|
8/1/2011
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston
Charleston, SC |
19,950
|
|
4,550
|
|
26,582
|
|
—
|
|
64
|
|
4,550
|
|
26,646
|
|
31,196
|
|
436
|
|
2015
|
8/27/2015
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook
Birmingham, AL |
25,784
|
|
2,000
|
|
42,246
|
|
—
|
|
102
|
|
2,000
|
|
42,348
|
|
44,348
|
|
353
|
|
2015
|
10/22/2015
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
F-
40
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Schedule III
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Initial Cost (A)
|
|
|
Gross amount at which carried at end of period
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hotel
|
Encumbrance
|
Land
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
Adjustments to Land Basis (C)
|
Adjustments to Basis (C)
|
Land and Improvements
|
Buildings and Improvements(D)
|
Total (D,E)
|
Accumulated Depreciation(D,F)
|
Year of Original Construction
|
Date of Acquisition
|
Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando, an Autograph Collection Hotel
Orlando, FL |
$
|
49,360
|
|
$
|
7,739
|
|
$
|
75,510
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,087
|
|
$
|
7,739
|
|
$
|
77,597
|
|
$
|
85,336
|
|
$
|
11,705
|
|
2001
|
12/27/2012
|
5 - 30 years
|
||||||||||||
|
Hampton Inn & Suites Baltimore Inner Harbor
Baltimore, MD |
—
|
|
1,700
|
|
21,067
|
|
—
|
|
1,973
|
|
1,700
|
|
23,040
|
|
24,740
|
|
8,163
|
|
1906
|
7/1/2007
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hampton Inn & Suites Denver Downtown
Denver, CO |
—
|
|
6,144
|
|
26,472
|
|
—
|
|
2,528
|
|
6,144
|
|
29,000
|
|
35,144
|
|
11,499
|
|
1989
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Chicago North Shore/Evanston
Evanston, IL |
—
|
|
2,920
|
|
27,995
|
|
—
|
|
4,688
|
|
2,920
|
|
32,683
|
|
35,603
|
|
11,690
|
|
2001
|
7/1/2007
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown
Washington, DC |
—
|
|
18,800
|
|
64,359
|
|
—
|
|
5,910
|
|
18,800
|
|
70,269
|
|
89,069
|
|
27,492
|
|
2000
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hilton St. Louis Downtown at the Arch
St. Louis, MO |
—
|
|
780
|
|
22,031
|
|
—
|
|
4,308
|
|
780
|
|
26,339
|
|
27,119
|
|
5,341
|
|
1888
|
3/23/2012
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hilton Suites Phoenix
Phoenix, AZ |
—
|
|
5,114
|
|
57,105
|
|
(1,702
|
)
|
(35,501
|
)
|
3,412
|
|
21,604
|
|
25,016
|
|
1,551
|
|
1990
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Homewood Suites by Hilton Houston near the Galleria
Houston, TX |
—
|
|
1,655
|
|
30,587
|
|
—
|
|
2,383
|
|
1,655
|
|
32,970
|
|
34,625
|
|
13,842
|
|
2006
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hotel Monaco Chicago
Chicago, IL |
26,000
|
|
15,056
|
|
40,841
|
|
—
|
|
1,021
|
|
15,056
|
|
41,862
|
|
56,918
|
|
5,121
|
|
1912
|
11/1/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hotel Monaco Denver
Denver, CO |
41,000
|
|
5,742
|
|
69,158
|
|
—
|
|
1,022
|
|
5,742
|
|
70,180
|
|
75,922
|
|
7,639
|
|
1917/1937
|
11/1/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hotel Monaco Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City, UT |
—
|
|
1,777
|
|
56,156
|
|
—
|
|
664
|
|
1,777
|
|
56,820
|
|
58,597
|
|
6,167
|
|
1924
|
11/1/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hotel Palomar Philadelphia
Philadelphia, PA |
—
|
|
9,060
|
|
90,909
|
|
—
|
|
219
|
|
9,060
|
|
91,128
|
|
100,188
|
|
1,835
|
|
1929
|
7/28/2015
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hyatt Key West Resort & Spa
Key West, FL |
—
|
|
40,986
|
|
34,529
|
|
—
|
|
2,737
|
|
40,986
|
|
37,266
|
|
78,252
|
|
4,116
|
|
1988
|
11/15/2103
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hyatt Regency Santa Clara
Santa Clara, CA |
60,200
|
|
—
|
|
100,227
|
|
—
|
|
9,804
|
|
—
|
|
110,031
|
|
110,031
|
|
12,860
|
|
1986
|
9/20/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
F-
41
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Schedule III
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Initial Cost (A)
|
|
|
Gross amount at which carried at end of period
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hotel
|
Encumbrance
|
Land
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
Adjustments to Land Basis (C)
|
Adjustments to Basis (C)
|
Land and Improvements
|
Buildings and Improvements(D)
|
Total (D,E)
|
Accumulated Depreciation(D,F)
|
Year of Original Construction
|
Date of Acquisition
|
Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Key West Bottling Court Retail Center
Key West, FL |
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,144
|
|
$
|
2,682
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
4,144
|
|
$
|
2,688
|
|
$
|
6,832
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
1953
|
11/25/2014
|
5 - 30 years
|
||||||||||||
|
Loews New Orleans
New Orleans, LA |
37,500
|
|
3,529
|
|
70,652
|
|
—
|
|
4,071
|
|
3,529
|
|
74,723
|
|
78,252
|
|
7,499
|
|
1972
|
10/11/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lorien Hotel & Spa
Alexandria, VA |
—
|
|
4,365
|
|
40,888
|
|
—
|
|
395
|
|
4,365
|
|
41,283
|
|
45,648
|
|
5,484
|
|
2009
|
10/24/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott Atlanta Century Center / Emory Area
Atlanta, GA |
—
|
|
—
|
|
36,571
|
|
—
|
|
3,970
|
|
—
|
|
40,541
|
|
40,541
|
|
18,591
|
|
1974
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott Charleston Town Center
Charleston, WV |
16,877
|
|
—
|
|
26,647
|
|
—
|
|
8,572
|
|
—
|
|
35,219
|
|
35,219
|
|
10,493
|
|
1982
|
2/25/2011
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott Chicago at Medical District/UIC
Chicago, IL |
—
|
|
8,831
|
|
17,911
|
|
—
|
|
5,718
|
|
8,831
|
|
23,629
|
|
32,460
|
|
11,316
|
|
1988
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott Dallas City Center
Dallas, TX |
40,090
|
|
6,300
|
|
45,158
|
|
—
|
|
18,668
|
|
6,300
|
|
63,826
|
|
70,126
|
|
22,288
|
|
1980
|
9/30/2010
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa
Lexington, KY |
34,374
|
|
8,638
|
|
54,960
|
|
1,498
|
|
7,437
|
|
10,136
|
|
62,397
|
|
72,533
|
|
13,005
|
|
1981
|
3/23/2012
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa
Napa Valley, CA |
—
|
|
14,800
|
|
57,223
|
|
—
|
|
6,447
|
|
14,800
|
|
63,670
|
|
78,470
|
|
12,309
|
|
1979
|
8/26/2011
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott San Francisco Airport Waterfront
San Francisco, CA |
—
|
|
36,700
|
|
72,370
|
|
—
|
|
20,851
|
|
36,700
|
|
93,221
|
|
129,921
|
|
16,617
|
|
1985
|
3/23/2012
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott West Des Moines
Des Moines, IA |
—
|
|
3,410
|
|
15,416
|
|
—
|
|
5,533
|
|
3,410
|
|
20,949
|
|
24,359
|
|
6,765
|
|
1981
|
5/11/2010
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center
Woodlands, TX |
—
|
|
5,500
|
|
98,886
|
|
—
|
|
28,800
|
|
5,500
|
|
127,686
|
|
133,186
|
|
46,758
|
|
2002
|
11/21/2007
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center
Atlanta, GA |
97,000
|
|
6,834
|
|
90,792
|
|
—
|
|
7,741
|
|
6,834
|
|
98,533
|
|
105,367
|
|
19,076
|
|
1983
|
3/23/2012
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Renaissance Austin Hotel
Austin, TX |
83,000
|
|
10,656
|
|
97,960
|
|
—
|
|
10,919
|
|
10,656
|
|
108,879
|
|
119,535
|
|
20,728
|
|
1986
|
3/23/2012
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residence Inn Baltimore Inner Harbor
Baltimore, MD |
—
|
|
—
|
|
55,410
|
|
—
|
|
4,400
|
|
—
|
|
59,810
|
|
59,810
|
|
23,205
|
|
2005
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
F-
42
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Schedule III
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Initial Cost (A)
|
|
|
Gross amount at which carried at end of period
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hotel
|
Encumbrance
|
Land
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
Adjustments to Land Basis (C)
|
Adjustments to Basis (C)
|
Land and Improvements
|
Buildings and Improvements(D)
|
Total (D,E)
|
Accumulated Depreciation(D,F)
|
Year of Original Construction
|
Date of Acquisition
|
Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residence Inn Boston Cambridge
Cambridge, MA |
$
|
63,000
|
|
$
|
10,346
|
|
$
|
72,735
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
5,417
|
|
$
|
10,346
|
|
$
|
78,152
|
|
$
|
88,498
|
|
$
|
27,392
|
|
1999
|
2/8/2008
|
5 - 30 years
|
||||||||||||
|
Residence Inn Denver City Center
Denver, CO |
45,210
|
|
5,291
|
|
74,638
|
|
—
|
|
454
|
|
5,291
|
|
75,092
|
|
80,383
|
|
8,887
|
|
2006
|
4/17/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
RiverPlace Hotel
Portland, OR |
—
|
|
18,322
|
|
46,664
|
|
—
|
|
112
|
|
18,322
|
|
46,776
|
|
65,098
|
|
1,006
|
|
1985
|
7/16/2015
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Westin Galleria Houston
Houston, TX |
60,000
|
|
7,842
|
|
112,850
|
|
—
|
|
2,862
|
|
7,842
|
|
115,712
|
|
123,554
|
|
13,280
|
|
1977
|
8/22/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Westin Oaks Houston at the Galleria
Houston, TX |
$
|
50,000
|
|
$
|
4,261
|
|
$
|
96,090
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,189
|
|
$
|
4,261
|
|
$
|
97,279
|
|
$
|
101,540
|
|
$
|
11,894
|
|
1971
|
8/22/2013
|
5 - 30 years
|
||||||||||||
|
Totals
|
$
|
928,502
|
|
$
|
373,350
|
|
$
|
2,654,572
|
|
$
|
1,348
|
|
$
|
192,719
|
|
$
|
374,698
|
|
$
|
2,847,291
|
|
$
|
3,221,989
|
|
$
|
580,285
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes:
|
(A)
|
The initial cost to the Company represents the original purchase price of the property, including amounts incurred subsequent to acquisition which were contemplated at the time the property was acquired.
|
|
(B)
|
The aggregate cost of real estate owned at December 31, 2014 for federal income tax purposes was approximately
$3,368 million
(unaudited).
|
|
(C)
|
Cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition includes payments under master lease agreements as well as additional tangible costs associated with investment properties, including any earn-out of tenant space. Impairment charges are recorded as a reduction in the basis.
|
|
(D)
|
Reconciliation of real estate owned (includes continuing operations and operations of assets classified as held for sale):
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at January 1
|
$
|
3,048,960
|
|
$
|
2,875,766
|
|
$
|
3,249,004
|
|
||
|
Acquisitions
|
245,138
|
|
178,022
|
|
940,525
|
|
|||||
|
Capital improvements
|
50,640
|
|
48,489
|
|
98,729
|
|
|||||
|
Reclasses of properties under development
|
75,378
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|||||
|
Disposals and write-offs
|
(141,265
|
)
|
(53,317
|
)
|
$
|
(133,395
|
)
|
||||
|
Properties classified as held for sale
|
$
|
(56,862
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(1,279,097
|
)
|
||
|
Balance at December 31
|
$
|
3,221,989
|
|
$
|
3,048,960
|
|
$
|
2,875,766
|
|
||
F-
43
XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Schedule III
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
December 31, 2015
|
(E)
|
Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation (includes continuing operations and operations of assets classified as held for sale):
|
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|||||||||
|
Balance at January 1
|
$
|
505,986
|
|
$
|
376,510
|
|
$
|
603,912
|
|
||
|
Depreciation expense, continuing operations
|
142,530
|
|
137,476
|
|
101,015
|
|
|||||
|
Depreciation expense, properties classified as held for sale
|
1,893
|
|
—
|
|
50,356
|
|
|||||
|
Accumulated depreciation, properties classified as held for sale
|
(22,353
|
)
|
—
|
|
(343,070
|
)
|
|||||
|
Disposals and write-offs
|
(47,771
|
)
|
(8,000
|
)
|
(35,703
|
)
|
|||||
|
Balance at December 31
|
$
|
580,285
|
|
$
|
505,986
|
|
$
|
376,510
|
|
||
|
(F)
|
Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated lives:
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
30 years
|
||
|
Tenant improvements
|
Life of the lease
|
||
|
Furniture, fixtures & equipment
|
5
|
-
|
15 years
|
F-
44
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IItem 1. BusinessItem 1A. Risk FactorsItem 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsItem 2. PropertiesItem 3. Legal ProceedingsItem 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresPart IIItem 5. Market For Registrant S Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity SecuritiesItem 6. Selected Financial DataItem 7. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of OperationsItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureItem 9A. Controls and ProceduresItem 9B. Other InformationPart IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceItem 11. Executive CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersItem 13. Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPart IVItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules