XLNX 10-Q Quarterly Report Dec. 28, 2013

XLNX 10-Q Quarter ended Dec. 28, 2013

XILINX INC

10-Qs and 10-Ks

10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 1, 2022
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 2, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended July 3, 2021
10-K	Fiscal year ended April 3, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 2, 2021
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 26, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended June 27, 2020
10-K	Fiscal year ended March 28, 2020
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 28, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 28, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended June 29, 2019
10-K	Fiscal year ended March 30, 2019
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 29, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 29, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2018
10-K	Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended July 1, 2017
10-K	Fiscal year ended April 1, 2017
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 31, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 1, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended July 2, 2016
10-K	Fiscal year ended April 2, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 2, 2016
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 26, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended June 27, 2015
10-K	Fiscal year ended March 28, 2015
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 27, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 27, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended June 28, 2014
10-K	Fiscal year ended March 29, 2014
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 28, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 28, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended June 29, 2013
10-K	Fiscal year ended March 30, 2013
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 29, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Sept. 29, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended June 30, 2012
10-K	Fiscal year ended March 31, 2012
10-Q	Quarter ended Dec. 31, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 1, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended July 2, 2011
10-K	Fiscal year ended April 2, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 1, 2011
10-Q	Quarter ended Oct. 2, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended July 3, 2010
10-K	Fiscal year ended April 3, 2010
10-Q	Quarter ended Jan. 2, 2010

PROXIES

DEF 14A	Filed on June 17, 2021
DEF 14A	Filed on June 19, 2020
DEF 14A	Filed on June 21, 2019
DEF 14A	Filed on June 20, 2018
DEF 14A	Filed on June 2, 2017
DEF 14A	Filed on June 1, 2016
DEF 14A	Filed on May 29, 2015
DEF 14A	Filed on May 30, 2014
DEF 14A	Filed on June 3, 2013
DEF 14A	Filed on May 29, 2012
DEF 14A	Filed on May 31, 2011
DEF 14A	Filed on June 1, 2010

10-Q 1 xlnx1228201310q.htm 10-Q XLNX 12.28.2013 10Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 28, 2013



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to _______ .

Commission File Number 000-18548

______________________________________________________________________________

Xilinx, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

______________________________________________________________________________



Delaware				77-0188631
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)				(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, California				95124
(Address of principal executive offices)				(Zip Code)

(408) 559-7778

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

______________________________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock:



Class		Shares Outstanding as of January 17, 2014
Common Stock, $.01 par value		266,854,824

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents




PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME	3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS	5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	7
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	25
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	33
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	34

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	35
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	35
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	36
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	44
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	45
SIGNATURES	46

Table of Contents


PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

XILINX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Net revenues	$	586,816		$	509,767	$	1,764,708	$	1,636,484
Cost of revenues	180,792			170,493		543,308		556,617
Gross margin	406,024			339,274		1,221,400		1,079,867
Operating expenses:
Research and development	128,092			129,055		364,635		364,389
Selling, general and administrative	91,794			86,823		280,520		274,952
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles	2,589			2,554		7,425		7,021
Litigation and contingencies	(19,190		)	—		9,410		—
Total operating expenses	203,285			218,432		661,990		646,362
Operating income	202,739			120,842		559,410		433,505
Interest and other expense, net	4,807			5,149		25,734		24,824
Income before income taxes	197,932			115,693		533,676		408,681
Provision for income taxes	22,055			12,045		59,315		51,765
Net income	$	175,877		$	103,648	$	474,361	$	356,916
Net income per common share:
Basic	$	0.66		$	0.40	$	1.78	$	1.36
Diluted	$	0.61		$	0.38	$	1.66	$	1.31
Cash dividends per common share	$	0.25		$	0.22	$	0.75	$	0.66
Shares used in per share calculations:
Basic	267,780			260,690		266,068		261,723
Diluted	288,195			271,174		285,380		271,861

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

XILINX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012
Net income	$	175,877		$	103,648		$	474,361		$	356,916
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities	(2,901		)	(2,253		)	(16,831		)	4,899
Reclassification adjustment for gain on available-for-sale securities	(21		)	(421		)	(188		)	(1,336		)
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging transactions	(96		)	(703		)	(251		)	1,809
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss on hedging transactions	(259		)	19			1,836			3,011
Cumulative translation adjustment	290			(51		)	(774		)	(484		)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(2,987		)	(3,409		)	(16,208		)	7,899
Total comprehensive income	$	172,890		$	100,239		$	458,153		$	364,815

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

XILINX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



(In thousands, except par value amounts)	December 28, 2013			March 30, 2013 [1]
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	631,879		$	623,558
Short-term investments	1,825,540			1,091,187
Accounts receivable, net	207,248			229,175
Inventories	206,728			201,250
Deferred tax assets	2,066			60,709
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	74,365			91,760
Total current assets	2,947,826			2,297,639
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:	802,093			784,796
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(447,293		)	(419,109		)
Net property, plant and equipment	354,800			365,687
Long-term investments	1,287,392			1,651,033
Goodwill	159,296			158,990
Acquisition-related intangibles, net	31,329			36,054
Other assets	221,158			220,048
Total Assets	$	5,001,801		$	4,729,451
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	90,123		$	72,766
Accrued payroll and related liabilities	152,397			124,195
Income taxes payable	4,595			60,632
Deferred income on shipments to distributors	48,075			53,358
Deferred tax liabilities	140,601			51
Other accrued liabilities	61,894			75,786
Convertible debentures (Note 10)	934,392			—
Total current liabilities	1,432,077			386,788
Convertible debentures (Note 10)	—			922,666
Deferred tax liabilities	279,696			415,442
Long-term income taxes payable	10,576			37,579
Other long-term liabilities	2,481			3,680
Commitments and contingencies
Temporary equity (Note 10)	355,243			—
Stockholder’s equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value (none issued)	—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value	2,665			2,636
Additional paid-in capital	1,037,592			1,276,278
Retained earnings	1,889,019			1,675,722
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(7,548		)	8,660
Total stockholders’ equity	2,921,728			2,963,296
Total Liabilities, Temporary Equity and Stockholders’ Equity	$	5,001,801		$	4,729,451


[1]	Derived from audited financial statements

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

XILINX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)



	Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	474,361		$	356,916
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	41,604			42,434
Amortization	14,828			12,878
Stock-based compensation	68,353			56,616
Net (gain) loss on sale of available-for-sale securities	277			(2,489		)
Amortization of debt discount on convertible debentures	12,144			11,877
Provision for deferred income taxes	70,168			48,302
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	(20,248		)	(6,312		)
Others	(1,512		)	437
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	21,927			(17,292		)
Inventories	(5,208		)	(21,018		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(7,929		)	5,021
Other assets	(15,695		)	(6,208		)
Accounts payable	17,357			19,953
Accrued liabilities	28,303			3,088
Income taxes payable	(77,905		)	(4,334		)
Deferred income on shipments to distributors	(5,283		)	(16,985		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	615,542			482,884
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(3,152,726		)	(2,965,026		)
Proceeds from sale and maturity of available-for-sale securities	2,758,941			2,684,994
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(30,717		)	(24,053		)
Other investing activities	27,092			(32,349		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(397,410		)	(336,434		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repurchases of common stock	(167,121		)	(197,750		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through various stock plans, net	137,363			51,950
Payment of dividends to stockholders	(200,301		)	(172,647		)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	20,248			6,312
Net cash used in financing activities	(209,811		)	(312,135		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	8,321			(165,685		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	623,558			788,822
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	631,879		$	623,137
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	26,526		$	26,526
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	67,335		$	6,917

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

XILINX, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


Note 1.	Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and should be read in conjunction with the Xilinx, Inc. (Xilinx or the Company) consolidated financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 . The interim financial statements are unaudited, but reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, of a normal, recurring nature necessary to provide a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 29, 2014 or any future period.

The Company uses a 52- to 53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest March 31. Fiscal 2014 and 2013 are a 52-week year ending on March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013 , respectively. The quarters ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 each included 13 weeks.


Note 2.	Recent Accounting Changes and Accounting Pronouncements

The Company adopted the authoritative guidance, established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), that sets requirements for presentation for significant items reclassified out of the accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in their entirety during the period, and for items not reclassified to net income in their entirety during the period. This guidance does not affect the underlying accounting for components of other comprehensive income.


Note 3.	Significant Customers and Concentrations of Credit Risk

Avnet, Inc. (Avnet), one of the Company’s distributors, distributes the Company’s products worldwide. As of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 , Avnet accounted for 55% and 64% of the Company’s total net accounts receivable, respectively. Resale of product through Avnet accounted for 45% and 47% of the Company’s worldwide net revenues in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , respectively. For the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , resale of product through Avnet accounted for 47% and 46% of the Company’s worldwide net revenues, respectively. The percentage of accounts receivable due from Avnet and the percentage of worldwide net revenues from Avnet are consistent with historical patterns.

Xilinx is subject to concentrations of credit risk primarily in its trade accounts receivable and investments in debt securities to the extent of the amounts recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company attempts to mitigate the concentration of credit risk in its trade receivables through its credit evaluation process, collection terms, distributor sales to diverse end customers and through geographical dispersion of sales. Xilinx generally does not require collateral for receivables from its end customers or distributors.

No end customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's worldwide net revenues for any of the periods presented.

The Company mitigates concentrations of credit risk in its investments in debt securities by currently investing more than 86% of its portfolio in AA or higher grade securities as rated by Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s Investors Service. The Company’s methods to arrive at investment decisions are not solely based on the rating agencies’ credit ratings. Xilinx also performs additional credit due diligence and conducts regular portfolio credit reviews, including a review of counterparty credit risk related to the Company’s forward currency exchange contracts. Additionally, Xilinx limits its investments in the debt securities of a single issuer based upon the issuer’s credit rating and attempts to further mitigate credit risk by diversifying risk across geographies and type of issuer.

As of December 28, 2013 , approximately 33% of the portfolio consisted of mortgage-backed securities. All of the mortgage-backed securities in the investment portfolio were issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises and agencies and are rated AA+ by Standard & Poor’s and AAA by Moody’s Investors Service.

The global credit and capital markets have continued to experience adverse conditions that have negatively impacted the values of various types of investment and non-investment grade securities, and have experienced volatility and disruption due to instability in the global financial system, uncertainty related to global economic conditions and concerns regarding sovereign financial stability. Therefore, there is a risk that the Company may incur other-than-temporary impairment charges for certain types of investments should credit market conditions deteriorate or the underlying assets fail to perform as anticipated. See "Note 5. Financial Instruments" for a table of the Company’s available-for-sale securities.

Table of Contents


Note 4.	Fair Value Measurements

The guidance for fair value measurements established by FASB defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which Xilinx would transact and also considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance.

The Company determines the fair value for marketable debt securities using industry standard pricing services, data providers and other third-party sources and by internally performing valuation testing and analyses. The Company primarily uses a consensus price or weighted-average price for its fair value assessment. The Company determines the consensus price using market prices from a variety of industry standard pricing services, data providers, security master files from large financial institutions and other third party sources and uses those multiple prices as inputs into a distribution-curve-based algorithm to determine the daily market value. The pricing services use multiple inputs to determine market prices, including reportable trades, benchmark yield curves, credit spreads and broker/dealer quotes as well as other industry and economic events. For certain securities with short maturities, such as discount commercial paper and certificates of deposit, the security is accreted from purchase price to face value at maturity. If a subsequent transaction on the same security is observed in the marketplace, the price on the subsequent transaction is used as the current daily market price and the security will be accreted to face value based on the revised price. For certain other securities, such as student loan auction rate securities, the Company performs its own valuation analysis using a discounted cash flow pricing model.

The Company validates the consensus prices by taking random samples from each asset type and corroborating those prices using reported trade activity, benchmark yield curves, binding broker/dealer quotes or other relevant price information. There have not been any changes to the Company's fair value methodology during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and the Company did not adjust or override any fair value measurements as of December 28, 2013 .

Fair Value Hierarchy

The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. The guidance for fair value measurements requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1 — Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

The Company's Level 1 assets consist of U.S. government and agency securities and money market funds.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

The Company's Level 2 assets consist of bank certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, U.S. agency securities, foreign government and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and a debt mutual fund. The Company's Level 2 assets and liabilities also include foreign currency forward contracts and commodity swap contracts.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques, as well as significant management judgment or estimation.

The Company's Level 3 assets and liabilities include student loan auction rate securities and the embedded derivative related to the Company's debentures.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

In instances where the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability. The following tables present information about the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 :

Table of Contents



	December 28, 2013
(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	152,160	$	—	$	—	$	152,160
Bank certificates of deposit	—		29,996		—		29,996
Commercial paper	—		19,996		—		19,996
Corporate bonds	—		172,237		—		172,237
U.S. government and agency securities	109,996		—		—		109,996
Foreign government and agency securities	—		79,987		—		79,987
Short-term investments:
Bank certificates of deposit	—		109,960		—		109,960
Commercial paper	—		179,978		—		179,978
Corporate bonds	—		310,845		—		310,845
Municipal bonds	—		11,990		—		11,990
U.S. government and agency securities	506,442		157,918		—		664,360
Foreign government and agency securities	—		229,940		—		229,940
Mortgage-backed securities	—		318,467		—		318,467
Long-term investments:
Corporate bonds	—		229,290		—		229,290
Auction rate securities	—		—		19,856		19,856
Municipal bonds	—		17,869		—		17,869
U.S. government and agency securities	11,720		44,270		—		55,990
Mortgage-backed securities	—		908,906		—		908,906
Debt mutual fund	—		55,481		—		55,481
Derivative financial instruments, net	—		473		—		473
Total assets measured at fair value	$	780,318	$	2,877,603	$	19,856	$	3,677,777
Liabilities
Convertible debentures — embedded derivative	$	—	$	—	$	628	$	628
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	628	$	628
Net assets measured at fair value	$	780,318	$	2,877,603	$	19,228	$	3,677,149

Table of Contents



	March 30, 2013
(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	108,311	$	—	$	—	$	108,311
Bank certificates of deposit	—		79,995		—		79,995
Commercial paper	—		208,667		—		208,667
U.S. government and agency securities	95,039		—		—		95,039
Foreign government and agency securities	—		54,989		—		54,989
Short-term investments:
Bank certificates of deposit	—		44,992		—		44,992
Commercial paper	—		294,883		—		294,883
Corporate bonds	—		40,728		—		40,728
Municipal bonds	—		3,706		—		3,706
U.S. government and agency securities	416,887		75,011		—		491,898
Foreign government and agency securities	—		214,912		—		214,912
Mortgage-backed securities	—		68		—		68
Long-term investments:
Corporate bonds	—		235,275		—		235,275
Auction rate securities	—		—		28,700		28,700
Municipal bonds	—		21,234		—		21,234
U.S. government and agency securities	55,142		55,143		—		110,285
Mortgage-backed securities	—		1,192,612		—		1,192,612
Debt mutual fund	—		62,927		—		62,927
Total assets measured at fair value	$	675,379	$	2,585,142	$	28,700	$	3,289,221
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments, net	$	—	$	1,615	$	—	$	1,615
Convertible debentures — embedded derivative	—		—		1,090		1,090
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	—	$	1,615	$	1,090	$	2,705
Net assets measured at fair value	$	675,379	$	2,583,527	$	27,610	$	3,286,516

Changes in Level 3 Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table is a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012
Balance as of beginning of period	$	22,229		$	27,524		$	27,610		$	27,998
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in interest and other expense, net	(221		)	221			462			(393		)
Included in other comprehensive income	870			(318		)	1,456			172
Sales and settlements, net	(3,650		)	(350		)	(10,300		)	(700		)
Balance as of end of period	$	19,228		$	27,077		$	19,228		$	27,077

The amount of total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held as of the end of the period was as follows:



	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Interest and other expense, net	$	(221	)	$	221	$	462	$	(393	)

As of December 28, 2013 , there was no material change to the input assumptions of the pricing model for the student loan auction rate securities as compared to the assumptions used as of our last fiscal year end. The valuation methodology was consistent with prior year.

The 3.125% Junior Convertible Debentures due March 15, 2037 ( 3.125% Debentures) included embedded features that qualify as an embedded derivative, and was separately accounted for as a discount on the 3.125% Debentures. Its fair value was established at the inception of the 3.125% Debentures. Each quarter, the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative, if any, is recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company uses a derivative valuation model to derive the value of the embedded derivative. Key inputs into this valuation model are the Company’s current stock price, risk-free interest rates, the stock dividend yield, the stock volatility and the 3.125% Debenture’s credit spread over London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The first three inputs are based on observable market data and are considered Level 2 inputs while the last two inputs require management judgment and are Level 3 inputs.

Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our Senior Convertible Debentures due June 15, 2017 ( 2.625% Debentures) and 3.125% Debentures are measured at fair value on a quarterly basis for disclosure purposes. The fair value of the 2.625% and 3.125% Debentures as of December 28, 2013 were approximately $924.0 million and $1.08 billion , respectively, based on the last trading price of the respective debentures for the period (classified as level 2 in fair value hierarchy due to relatively low trading volume).


Note 5.	Financial Instruments

The following is a summary of cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities as of the end of the periods presented:

Table of Contents



	December 28, 2013									March 30, 2013
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Money market funds	$	152,160	$	—	$	—		$	152,160	$	108,311	$	—	$	—		$	108,311
Bank certificates of deposit	139,956		—		—			139,956		124,987		—		—			124,987
Commercial paper	199,974		—		—			199,974		503,550		—		—			503,550
Corporate bonds	711,636		2,951		(2,215		)	712,372		270,945		5,193		(135		)	276,003
Auction rate securities	21,500		—		(1,644		)	19,856		31,900		—		(3,200		)	28,700
Municipal bonds	29,924		346		(411		)	29,859		24,496		514		(70		)	24,940
U.S. government and
agency securities	830,128		607		(389		)	830,346		696,836		431		(45		)	697,222
Foreign government and
agency securities	309,929		—		(2		)	309,927		269,901		—		—			269,901
Mortgage-backed securities	1,231,104		10,073		(13,804		)	1,227,373		1,180,156		17,601		(5,077		)	1,192,680
Debt mutual fund	61,350		—		(5,869		)	55,481		61,350		1,577		—			62,927
	$	3,687,661	$	13,977	$	(24,334	)	$	3,677,304	$	3,272,432	$	25,316	$	(8,527	)	$	3,289,221

The following tables show the fair values and gross unrealized losses of the Company’s investments, aggregated by investment category, for individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the length of time specified, as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 :



	December 28, 2013
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Corporate bonds	$	156,468	$	(2,105	)	$	4,460	$	(110	)	$	160,928	$	(2,215	)
Auction rate securities	—		—			19,856		(1,644		)	19,856		(1,644		)
Municipal bonds	8,260		(374		)	1,271		(37		)	9,531		(411		)
U.S. government and
agency securities	197,086		(389		)	—		—			197,086		(389		)
Foreign government and
agency securities	14,995		(2		)	—		—			14,995		(2		)
Mortgage-backed securities	637,186		(12,187		)	64,762		(1,617		)	701,948		(13,804		)
Debt mutual fund	55,481		(5,869		)	—		—			55,481		(5,869		)
	$	1,069,476	$	(20,926	)	$	90,349	$	(3,408	)	$	1,159,825	$	(24,334	)



	March 30, 2013
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Corporate bonds	$	27,114	$	(135	)	$	—	$	—		$	27,114	$	(135	)
Auction rate securities	—		—			28,701		(3,200		)	28,701		(3,200		)
Municipal bonds	8,927		(70		)	60		—			8,987		(70		)
U.S. government and
agency securities	388,696		(45		)	—		—			388,696		(45		)
Mortgage-backed securities	367,561		(4,930		)	11,029		(147		)	378,590		(5,077		)
	$	792,298	$	(5,180	)	$	39,790	$	(3,347	)	$	832,088	$	(8,527	)

Table of Contents

The gross unrealized losses that had been outstanding for less than twelve months were primarily related to mortgage-backed securities and the debt mutual fund, although the percentage of such losses to the total estimated fair value of the mortgage-backed securities was relatively insignificant. The gross unrealized losses that had been outstanding for more than twelve months were primarily related to failed auction rate securities, which were due to adverse conditions in the global credit markets during the past five years, and mortgage-backed securities, which were primarily due to the general rising of the interest-rate environment in the prior year.

The Company reviewed the investment portfolio and determined that the gross unrealized losses on these investments as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 were temporary in nature as evidenced by the fluctuations in the gross unrealized losses within the investment categories. These investments are highly rated by the credit rating agencies and there have been no defaults on any of these securities, and we have received interest payments as they become due. Additionally, in the past several years a portion of the Company's investment in the auction rate securities and the mortgage-backed securities were redeemed or prepaid by the debtors at par. Furthermore, the aggregate of individual unrealized losses that had been outstanding for twelve months or more was not significant as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 . The Company neither intends to sell these investments nor concludes that it is more-likely-than-not that it will have to sell them until recovery of their carrying values. The Company also believes that it will be able to collect both principal and interest amounts due to the Company at maturity, given the high credit quality of these investments and any related underlying collateral.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of marketable debt securities (bank certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds, auction rate securities, municipal bonds, U.S. and foreign government and agency securities and mortgage-backed securities), by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.



	December 28, 2013
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	1,774,724	$	1,774,774
Due after one year through five years	437,826		439,176
Due after five years through ten years	250,055		250,953
Due after ten years	1,011,546		1,004,760
	$	3,474,151	$	3,469,663

As of December 28, 2013 , $463.0 million of marketable debt securities with contractual maturities of greater than one year were classified as short-term investments. Additionally, the above table did not include investments in money market and mutual funds because these funds do not have specific contractual maturities.

Certain information related to available-for-sale securities is as follows:



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities	$	97,519		$	61,293		$	296,679		$	262,456
Gross realized gains on sale of available-for-sale securities	$	401		$	811		$	1,768		$	2,639
Gross realized losses on sale of available-for-sale securities	(530		)	(63		)	(2,045		)	(150		)
Net realized gains (losses) on sale of available-for-sale securities	$	(129	)	$	748		$	(277	)	$	2,489
Amortization of premiums on available-for-sale securities	$	6,458		$	6,580		$	20,521		$	18,141

The cost of securities matured or sold is based on the specific identification method.


Note 6.	Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company’s primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. As a result of the use of derivative financial instruments, the Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts may fail to meet their contractual obligations. The Company manages counterparty credit risk in derivative

Table of Contents

contracts by reviewing counterparty creditworthiness on a regular basis, establishing collateral requirement and limiting exposure to any single counterparty. The right of set-off that exists with certain transactions enables the Company to net amounts due to and from the counterparty, reducing the maximum loss from credit risk in the event of counterparty default.

As of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 , the Company had the following outstanding forward currency exchange contracts (in notional amount), which are derivative financial instruments:



(In thousands and U.S. dollars)	December 28, 2013		March 30, 2013
Singapore Dollar	$	61,031	$	70,197
Euro	44,433		39,865
Indian Rupee	17,457		16,941
British Pound	10,811		11,602
Japanese Yen	9,057		10,891
	$	142,789	$	149,496

As part of the Company’s strategy to reduce volatility of operating expenses due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the Company employs a hedging program with a forward outlook of up to two years for major foreign-currency-denominated operating expenses. The outstanding forward currency exchange contracts expire at various dates between January 2014 and November 2015 . The net unrealized gain or loss, which approximates the fair market value of the above contracts, is expected to be realized and reclassified into net income within the next two years .

As of December 28, 2013 , all of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges and the effective portion of the gain or loss on the forward contracts was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into net income in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The estimated amount of such gains or losses as of December 28, 2013 that is expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months was not material. The ineffective portion of the gains or losses on the forward contracts was included in the net income for all periods presented.

The Company may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge firm commitments such as acquisitions and capital expenditures. Gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts that are designated as hedges of anticipated transactions, for which a firm commitment has been attained and the hedged relationship has been effective, are deferred and included in income or expenses in the same period that the underlying transaction is settled. Gains and losses on any instruments not meeting the above criteria are recognized in income or expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of income as they are incurred.

The 3.125% Debentures include provisions which qualify as an embedded derivative. See "Note 4. Fair Value Measurements" for more discussion about the embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was $628 thousand and $1.1 million as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 , respectively. The changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative were recorded to interest and other expense, net, on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income.

The Company had the following derivative instruments (forward foreign currency exchange contracts) as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 , located on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, utilized for risk management purposes detailed above:



	Foreign Exchange Contracts
	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
(In thousands)	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
December 28, 2013	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	2,396	Other accrued liabilities	$	1,924
March 30, 2013	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	1,179	Other accrued liabilities	$	2,794

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of income for third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and 2013 :

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income on derivative (effective portion of cash flow hedging)	$	(355	)	$	(683	)	$	1,585	$	4,822

Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income (effective portion) *	$	(259	)	$	(19	)	$	1,836	$	(3,011	)

Amount of gain (loss) recorded (ineffective portion) *	$	5		$	(3	)	$	11	$	4


*	Recorded in Interest and Other Expense location within the condensed consolidated statements of income


Note 7.	Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company’s equity incentive plans are broad-based, long-term retention programs that cover employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company. These plans are intended to attract and retain talented employees, consultants and non-employee directors and to provide such persons with a proprietary interest in the Company.

Stock-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to stock awards granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans and rights to acquire stock granted under the Company’s 1990 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP):



	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Stock-based compensation included in:
Cost of revenues	$	1,966	$	1,517	$	5,628	$	4,718
Research and development	11,912		9,654		33,474		27,681
Selling, general and administrative	10,461		8,591		29,251		24,217
	$	24,339	$	19,762	$	68,353	$	56,616

During the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and 2013 , the tax benefits realized for the tax deduction from option exercises and other awards credited to additional paid-in capital were $17.0 million and $5.4 million , respectively.

The fair values of stock options and stock purchase plan rights under the Company’s equity incentive plans and ESPP were estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company’s expected stock price volatility assumption for stock options is estimated using implied volatility of the Company’s traded options. The expected life of options granted is based on the historical exercise activity as well as the expected disposition of all options outstanding. The expected life of options granted also considers the actual contractual term. The weighted-average fair value per share of stock options granted during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and 2013 was $6.06 and $6.20 , respectively. No options were granted in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 . These fair values per share were estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Expected life of options (years)	—		4.9		4.7		4.9
Expected stock price volatility	—	%	28.0	%	24.0	%	28.0	%
Risk-free interest rate	—	%	0.7	%	0.9	%	0.7	%
Dividend yield	—	%	2.6	%	2.6	%	2.6	%

The estimated fair values of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards were calculated based on the market price of Xilinx common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the present value of dividends expected to be paid on Xilinx common stock prior to vesting. The

Table of Contents

per share weighted-average fair values of RSUs granted during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 was $42.37 ( $31.47 for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 ), and for the first nine months of fiscal 2014 was $38.13 ( $31.15 for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 ), which were calculated based on estimates at the date of grant using the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Risk-free interest rate	0.7	%	0.3	%	0.7	%	0.4	%
Dividend yield	2.2	%	2.6	%	2.5	%	2.7	%

Employee Stock Option Plans

A summary of the Company’s option plans activity and related information is as follows:



	Options Outstanding
(Shares in thousands)	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
March 31, 2012	17,788		$	28.32
Granted	92		$	33.83
Exercised	(3,564	)	$	24.68
Forfeited/cancelled/expired	(1,563	)	$	39.54
March 30, 2013	12,753		$	28.01
Granted	5		$	38.99
Exercised	(4,788	)	$	29.31
Forfeited/cancelled/expired	(49	)	$	35.43
December 28, 2013	7,921		$	27.18
Options exercisable at:
December 28, 2013	7,423		$	27.04
March 30, 2013	11,639		$	28.07

The types of awards allowed under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (2007 Equity Plan) include incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, RSUs, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. To date, the Company has issued a mix of non-qualified stock options and RSUs under the 2007 Equity Plan. On August 14, 2013, the stockholders approved an amendment to increase the authorized number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2007 Equity Plan by 2.0 million shares and to extend the term of the 2007 Equity Plan to December 31, 2023. As of December 28, 2013 , 15.5 million shares remained available for grant under the 2007 Equity Plan.

The total pre-tax intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and nine months ended December 28, 2013 was $5.5 million and $70.7 million , respectively. The total pre-tax intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months and nine months ended December 29, 2012 was $8.6 million and $20.3 million , respectively.

This intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of exercise.

RSU Awards

A summary of the Company’s RSU activity and related information is as follows:

Table of Contents



	RSUs Outstanding
(Shares in thousands)	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share
March 31, 2012	5,239		$	29.01
Granted	3,018		$	31.58
Vested	(1,778	)	$	27.01
Cancelled	(483	)	$	29.69
March 30, 2013	5,996		$	30.83
Granted	2,760		$	37.97
Vested	(1,698	)	$	29.14
Cancelled	(243	)	$	31.91
December 28, 2013	6,815		$	34.10

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the ESPP, shares are only issued during the second and fourth quarters of each fiscal year. Employees purchased 529 thousand shares for $14.6 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and 521 thousand shares for $14.1 million i n the second quarter of fiscal 2013 . The per-share weighted-average fair value of stock purchase rights granted under the ESPP during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and 2013 was $11.24 and $8.53 , respectively. The fair values of stock purchase plan rights granted in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and 2013 were estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions:



	2014		2013
Expected life of options (years)	1.25		1.25
Expected stock price volatility	23.0	%	29.0	%
Risk-free interest rate	0.2	%	0.2	%
Dividend yield	2.1	%	2.7	%

The next scheduled purchase under the ESPP is in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 . On August 14, 2013, the stockholders approved an amendment to increase the authorized number of shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP by 2.0 million shares. As of December 28, 2013 , 10.4 million shares were available for future issuance out of 50.5 million shares authorized.


Note 8.	Net Income Per Common Share

The computation of basic net income per common share for all periods presented is derived from the information on the condensed consolidated statements of income, and there are no reconciling items in the numerator used to compute diluted net income per common share.

The total shares used in the denominator of the diluted net income per common share calculation included 14.5 million and 13.7 million potentially dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , respectively, that were not included in basic net income per common share by applying the treasury stock method to the impact of incremental shares issuable assuming conversion of the debentures (see "Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility"). For the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , the total shares used in the denominator of the diluted net income per common share calculation included 6.2 million and 5.9 million , respectively, that were not included in basic net income per common share by applying the treasury stock method to the impact of incremental shares issuable assuming conversion of the debentures.

Additionally, the total shares used in the denominator of the diluted net income per common share calculation included 5.9 million and 5.6 million potentially dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , respectively, that were not included in basic net income per common share. For the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , the total shares used in the denominator of the diluted net income per common share calculation included 4.3 million and 4.2 million potentially dilutive common equivalent shares, respectively. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares are determined by applying the treasury stock method to the impact of incremental shares issuable assuming exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants, vesting of outstanding RSUs and issuance of common stock under the ESPP.

Table of Contents

Outstanding stock options and RSUs to purchase approximately 4.6 million and 4.5 million shares for the third quarter and for the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , respectively, under the Company’s stock award plans were excluded from diluted net income per common share by applying the treasury stock method, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. These options and RSUs could be dilutive in the future if the Company’s average share price increases and is greater than the combined exercise prices and the unamortized fair values of these options and RSUs.

To hedge against potential dilution upon conversion of the 2.625% Debentures, the Company also purchased call options on its common stock from the hedge counterparties. The call options give the Company the right to purchase up to 20.0 million shares of its common stock at $29.97 per share. These call options are not considered for purposes of calculating the total shares outstanding under the basic and diluted net income per share, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. Upon exercise, the call options would serve to neutralize the dilutive effect of the 2.625% Debentures and potentially reduce the weighted number of diluted shares used in per share calculations.


Note 9.	Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of actual cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method), or market (estimated net realizable value) and are comprised of the following:



(In thousands)	December 28, 2013		March 30, 2013
Raw materials	$	16,659	$	12,484
Work-in-process	164,335		165,034
Finished goods	25,734		23,732
	$	206,728	$	201,250


Note 10.	Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility

2.625% Senior Convertible Debentures

As of December 28, 2013 , the Company had $600.0 million principal amount of 2.625% Debentures outstanding. The 2.625% Debentures are senior in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the 2.625% Debentures, including the 3.125% Debentures described below.

The 2.625% Debentures are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into shares of Xilinx common stock at a conversion price of 33.3681 shares of common stock per $1 thousand principal amount of the 2.625% Debentures, representing an effective conversion price of approximately $29.97 per share of common stock. One of the conditions allowing holders of the 2.625% Debentures to convert during any fiscal quarter is if the last reported sale price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day. This condition was met as of December 28, 2013 and as a result, the 2.625% Debentures were convertible at the option of the holders. As of December 28, 2013 the 2.625% Debentures were classified as a current liability on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, a portion of the equity component attributable to the conversion feature of the 2.625% Debentures was classified in temporary stockholders' equity. The amount classified as temporary equity was equal to the difference between the principal amount and carrying value of the 2.625% Debentures.

The conversion rate is subject to adjustment for certain events as outlined in the indenture governing the 2.625% Debentures but will not be adjusted for accrued interest.

The carrying values of the liability and equity components of the 2.625% Debentures are reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows:

Table of Contents



(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			March 30, 2013
Liability component:
Principal amount of the 2.625% Debentures	$	600,000		$	600,000
Unamortized discount of liability component	(53,109		)	(64,767		)
Hedge accounting adjustment – sale of interest rate swap	15,347			18,716
Net carrying value of the 2.625% Debentures	$	562,238		$	553,949

Equity component (including temporary equity) – net carrying value	$	66,415		$	66,415

Interest expense related to the 2.625% Debentures was included in interest and other expense, net on the condensed consolidated statements of income as follows:



	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Contractual coupon interest	$	3,938	$	3,938	$	11,813	$	11,813
Amortization of debt issuance costs	362		362		1,086		1,086
Amortization of debt discount, net	2,763		2,763		8,289		8,289
Total interest expense related to the 2.625% Debentures	$	7,063	$	7,063	$	21,188	$	21,188

3.125% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures

As of December 28, 2013 , the Company had $689.6 million principal amount of 3.125% Debentures outstanding. The 3.125% Debentures are subordinated in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future senior debt, including the 2.625% Debentures, and to the other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.

The 3.125% Debentures are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into shares of Xilinx common stock at a conversion price of 34.2957 shares of common stock per $1 thousand principal amount of 3.125% Debentures, representing an effective conversion price of approximately $29.16 per share of common stock. One of the conditions allowing holders of the 3.125% Debentures to convert during any fiscal quarter is if the last reported sale price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day. This condition was met as of December 28, 2013 and as a result, the 3.125% Debentures were convertible at the option of the holders. As of December 28, 2013 the 3.125% Debentures were classified as a current liability on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, a portion of the equity component attributable to the conversion feature of the 3.125% Debentures was classified in temporary stockholders' equity. The amount classified as temporary equity was equal to the difference between the principal amount and carrying value of the 3.125% Debentures.

The conversion rate is subject to adjustment for certain events as outlined in the indenture governing the 3.125% Debentures but will not be adjusted for accrued interest.

The carrying values of the liability and equity components of the 3.125% Debentures are reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows:

Table of Contents



(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			March 30, 2013
Liability component:
Principal amount of the 3.125% Debentures	$	689,635		$	689,635
Unamortized discount of liability component	(316,765		)	(320,620		)
Unamortized discount of embedded derivative from date of issuance	(1,344		)	(1,388		)
Carrying value of liability component – 3.125% Debentures	371,526			367,627
Carrying value of embedded derivative component	628			1,090
Net carrying value of the 3.125% Debentures	$	372,154		$	368,717

Equity component (including temporary equity) – net carrying value	$	229,513		$	229,513

Interest expense related to the 3.125% Debentures was included in interest and other expense, net on the condensed consolidated statements of income and was recognized as follows:



	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012
Contractual coupon interest	$	5,388	$	5,388		$	16,163		$	16,163
Amortization of debt issuance costs	55		55			168			168
Amortization of embedded derivative	14		14			43			43
Amortization of debt discount	1,309		1,218			3,855			3,588
Fair value adjustment of embedded derivative	221		(221		)	(462		)	393
Total interest expense related to the 3.125% Debentures	$	6,987	$	6,454		$	19,767		$	20,355

Revolving Credit Facility

On December 7, 2011 , the Company entered into a $250.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks (expiring in December 2016 ). Borrowings under the credit facility will bear interest at a benchmark rate plus an applicable margin based upon the Company’s credit rating. In connection with the credit facility, the Company is required to maintain certain financial and nonfinancial covenants. As of December 28, 2013 , the Company had made no borrowings under this credit facility and was not in violation of any of the covenants.


Note 11.	Common Stock Repurchase Program

The Board of Directors has approved stock repurchase programs enabling the Company to repurchase its common stock in the open market or through negotiated transactions with independent financial institutions. In August 2012, the Board authorized the repurchase of an additional $750.0 million of the Company's common stock and debentures (2012 Repurchase Program). The 2012 Repurchase Program has no stated expiration date.

Through December 28, 2013 , the Company had used $177.7 million of the $750.0 million authorized under the 2012 Repurchase Program, leaving $572.3 million available for future repurchases. The Company’s current policy is to retire all repurchased shares and debentures, and consequently, no treasury shares or debentures were held as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 .

During the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , the Company repurchased 3.7 million shares of common stock in the open market for a total of $167.1 million . During the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , the Company repurchased 6.2 million shares of common stock for a total of $197.8 million .


Note 12.	Interest and Other Expense, Net

The components of interest and other expense, net are as follows:

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			December 29, 2012
Interest income	$	9,545		$	7,120		$	20,511		$	19,183
Interest expense	(14,050		)	(13,517		)	(40,955		)	(41,543		)
Other income (expense), net	(302		)	1,248			(5,290		)	(2,464		)
	$	(4,807	)	$	(5,149	)	$	(25,734	)	$	(24,824	)


Note 13.	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:



(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			March 30, 2013
Accumulated unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	$	(6,500	)	$	10,519
Accumulated unrealized gain (loss) on hedging transactions, net of tax	217			(1,368		)
Accumulated cumulative translation adjustment	(1,265		)	(491		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(7,548	)	$	8,660

The related tax effects of other comprehensive income (loss) were not material for all periods presented.


Note 14.	Income Taxes

The Company recorded tax provisions of $22.1 million and $59.3 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , respectively, representing effective tax rates of 11% for both periods. The rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 included a net discrete benefit of $3.7 million relating primarily to lapses of statutes of limitation. The Company recorded tax provisions of $12.0 million and $51.8 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , respectively, representing effective tax rates of 10% and 13% , respectively. The rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 included a net discrete benefit of $5.3 million relating primarily to lapses of statutes of limitation.

The difference between the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and the Company’s effective tax rate in all periods is primarily due to income earned in lower tax rate jurisdictions, for which no U.S. income tax has been provided, as the Company intends to permanently reinvest these earnings outside of the U.S.

During the nine -month period ended December 28, 2013 , there was a decrease in current deferred tax assets, an increase in current deferred tax liabilities and a decrease in long-term deferred tax liabilities. These changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities were primarily related to the reclassification of the Company's debentures from long-term liabilities and additional paid-in capital to current liabilities and temporary equity. See "Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility" for further disclosure of the underlying changes. In addition, there was a significant U.S. Federal tax payment which reduced the income taxes payable balance.

The Company’s total gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 28, 2013 , determined in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance for measuring uncertain tax positions, decreased by $10.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 to $23.8 million . The decrease was primarily attributable to lapses of statutes of limitations and closures of state tax audits. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if realized in a future period, would favorably affect the effective tax rate was $9.9 million as of December 28, 2013 . It is reasonably possible that changes to our unrecognized tax benefits could be significant in the next twelve months due to tax audits, settlements and lapses of statutes of limitation. As a result of uncertainties regarding tax audits and settlements and their possible outcomes, an estimate of the range of increase or decrease that could occur in the next twelve months cannot be made.

The Company’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities within the provision for income taxes on the condensed consolidated statements of income. The balance of accrued interest and penalties recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the amounts of interest and penalties included in the Company's provision for income taxes were not material for all periods presented.

The Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal audits by taxing authorities for years through fiscal 2010. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. state audits for years through fiscal 2004, except for fiscal years 1996 through 2001 which are still open for audit purposes. The Company is no longer subject to tax audits in Ireland for years through fiscal 2009.

Table of Contents


Note 15.	Commitments

Xilinx leases some of its facilities and office buildings under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through October 2021 . Additionally, Xilinx entered into a land lease in conjunction with the Company’s building in Singapore, which will expire in November 2035 and the lease cost was settled in an up-front payment in June 2006. Some of the operating leases for facilities and office buildings require payment of operating costs, including property taxes, repairs, maintenance and insurance. Most of the Company’s leases contain renewal options for varying terms. Approximate future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:



Fiscal	(In thousands)
2014 (remaining three months)	$	1,651
2015	5,974
2016	3,990
2017	2,281
2018	1,980
Thereafter	5,022
Total	$	20,898

Aggregate future rental income to be received, which includes rents from both owned and leased property, totaled $5.2 million as of December 28, 2013 . Rent expense, net of rental income, under all operating leases was $735 thousand and $2.2 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , respectively. Rent expense, net of rental income, under all operating leases was $904 thousand and $3.0 million for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , respectively. Rental income was not material for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 or 2013 .

Other commitments as of December 28, 2013 totaled $151.3 million and consisted of purchases of inventory and other non-cancelable purchase obligations related to subcontractors that manufacture silicon wafers and provide assembly and some test services. The Company expects to receive and pay for these materials and services in the next three to six months, as the products meet delivery and quality specifications. As of December 28, 2013 , the Company also had $27.1 million of non-cancelable license obligations to providers of electronic design automation software and hardware/software maintenance expiring at various dates through December 2016 .

The Company committed up to $5.0 million to acquire, in the future, rights to intellectual property (IP) until July 2023 . License payments will be amortized over the useful life of the IP acquired.


Note 16.	Product Warranty and Indemnification

The Company generally sells products with a limited warranty for product quality. The Company provides an accrual for known product issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and the end of fiscal 2013 , the accrual balances of the product warranty liability were immaterial.

The Company offers, subject to certain terms and conditions, to indemnify certain customers and distributors for costs and damages awarded against these parties in the event the Company’s hardware products are found to infringe third-party IP rights, including patents, copyrights or trademarks, and to compensate certain customers for limited specified costs they actually incur in the event our hardware products experience epidemic failure. To a lesser extent, the Company may from time-to-time offer limited indemnification with respect to its software products. The terms and conditions of these indemnity obligations are limited by contract, which obligations are typically perpetual from the effective date of the agreement. The Company has historically received only a limited number of requests for indemnification under these provisions and has not made any significant payments pursuant to these provisions. The Company cannot estimate the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, that the Company may be required to make as a result of these obligations due to the limited history of indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular claim and indemnification provision. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will not incur any financial liabilities in the future as a result of these obligations.


Note 17.	Contingencies

Patent Litigation

On December 28, 2007, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by PACT against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (PACT XPP Technologies, AG. v. Xilinx, Inc. and Avnet, Inc. Case No. 2:07-CV-563).

Table of Contents

The lawsuit pertained to eleven different patents and PACT sought injunctive relief, damages including enhanced damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. Nine of the eleven patents were dismissed from the case prior to trial. Trial commenced in the matter on May 14, 2012 and on May 18, 2012 the jury concluded its deliberations. The jury found five claims of the two patents held by PACT were valid and were willfully infringed by the Company. The jury awarded PACT the sum of $15.4 million as damages and royalties on past Xilinx sales from March 2002 to May 2012. On August 30, 2013, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, issued a memorandum order finding enhanced damages to be appropriate in the patent infringement suit brought against the Company. The judge’s order for enhanced damages adjusted the jury award to approximately $38.5 million on the basis of the judge’s consideration of applicable factors. On September 3, 2013, the court also issued an order requiring the Company to pay approximately $2.5 million for PACT’s costs and attorneys’ fees and an order requiring the Company to pay approximately $3.0 million for pre- and post-judgment interest. The court denied without prejudice PACT’s motion for ongoing royalties on Xilinx sales from May 2012 and onwards which are subject to the patents in suit, and ordered the parties to negotiate resolution of the future royalty rate on such Xilinx sales. Final judgment in the case was issued on September 4, 2013.

On October 2, 2013, the Company filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division of its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On December 19, 2013, the Company entered into a Settlement and License Agreement with PACT. Under the settlement, the parties agreed to dismiss with prejudice all outstanding patent litigation between the Company, Avnet and PACT and the Company agreed to pay PACT a lump sum of $33.5 million . In addition, the Company received a license to all patents owned or controlled by PACT. On December 23, 2013, the trial court dismissed the suit and on December 27, 2013, the court of appeals dismissed the appeal.

The Company previously recorded charges of $15.4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and $28.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2014, for a total accrual of $44.0 million . Due to the settlement on December 19, 2013, in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 the Company reversed the initial $44.0 million accrual, and recorded $24.8 million of the $33.5 million settlement as a current period charge to the condensed consolidated statements of income. The remainder of the settlement will be amortized in future periods.

On February 14, 2011, the Company filed a complaint for declaratory judgment of patent non-infringement and invalidity against Intellectual Ventures in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. On September 30, 2011, the Company amended its complaint in this case to eliminate certain defendants and patents from the action (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Case No CV11-0671). The lawsuit pertains to one patent and seeks judgment of non-infringement by Xilinx and judgment that the patent is invalid and unenforceable, as well as costs and attorneys’ fees.

On February 15, 2011, Intellectual Ventures added the Company as a defendant in its complaint for patent infringement previously filed against Altera, Microsemi and Lattice in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Altera Corporation, Microsemi Corporation, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Xilinx, Inc., Case No. 10-CV-1065). The lawsuit pertains to five patents, four of which Xilinx is alleged to be infringing. Intellectual Ventures seeks unspecified damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit is currently scheduled to go to trial in May 2014. The Company is unable to estimate its range of possible loss in this matter at this time.

On October 17, 2011, the Company filed a complaint for patent non-infringement and invalidity and violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Intellectual Ventures and related entities as well as additional defendants (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures, LLC. Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC, Detelle Relay KG, LLC, Roldan Block NY LLC, Latrosse Technologies LLC, TR Technologies Foundation LLC, Taichi Holdings, LLC, Noregin Assets N.V., LLC and Intellectual Venture Funding LLC Case No CV-04407). By order dated January 25, 2012, the Court granted with leave to amend defendants' motion to dismiss the Company's claim for violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17200. The Company has amended its complaint to remove the claim for violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17200. The remainder of the lawsuit pertains to two patents and seeks judgments of non-infringement by the Company and judgments that the patents are invalid and unenforceable, as well as costs and attorneys’ fees.

On November 5, 2012, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by Mosaid against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc., Case No. 6:12-CV-00847). The lawsuit pertains to five patents and Mosaid seeks unspecified damages, costs, fees, royalties and injunctive relief and the proceedings are in their early stages. The Company is unable to estimate its range of possible loss in this matter at this time.

The Company intends to continue to protect and defend our IP vigorously.

Other Matters

Table of Contents

Except as stated above, there are no pending legal proceedings of a material nature to which the Company is a party of which any of its property is the subject.

From time to time, the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These include disputes and lawsuits related to IP, mergers and acquisitions, licensing, contract law, tax, regulatory, distribution arrangements, employee relations and other matters. Periodically, the Company reviews the status of each matter and assesses its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and a range of possible losses can be estimated, the Company accrues a liability for the estimated loss. Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, the Company continues to reassess the potential liability related to pending claims and litigation and may revise estimates.


Note 18.	Goodwill and Acquisition-Related Intangibles

As of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 , the gross and net amounts of goodwill and of acquisition-related intangibles for all acquisitions were as follows:



(In thousands)	December 28, 2013			March 30, 2013			Weighted Average Amortization Life
Goodwill	$	159,296		$	158,990
Core technology, gross	$	91,860		$	89,360		5.7 years
Less accumulated amortization	(60,923		)	(54,201		)
Core technology, net	30,937			35,159
Other intangibles, gross	46,716			46,516			2.7 years
Less accumulated amortization	(46,324		)	(45,621		)
Other intangibles, net	392			895
Total acquisition-related intangibles, gross	138,576			135,876
Less accumulated amortization	(107,247		)	(99,822		)
Total acquisition-related intangibles, net	$	31,329		$	36,054

Amortization expense for acquisition-related intangibles for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2013 was $2.6 million and $7.4 million , respectively. Amortization expense for acquisition-related intangibles for the three and nine months ended December 29, 2012 was $2.6 million and $7.0 million , respectively.

Based on the carrying value of acquisition-related intangibles recorded as of December 28, 2013 , and assuming no subsequent impairment of the underlying assets, the annual amortization expense for acquisition-related intangibles is expected to be as follows:



Fiscal	(In thousands)
2014 (remaining three months)	$	2,462
2015	9,537
2016	8,936
2017	7,131
2018	2,660
Thereafter	603
Total	$	31,329


Note 19.	Subsequent Event

On January 20, 2014 , the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per common share for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 . The dividend is payable on February 27, 2014 to stockholders of record on February 6, 2014 .

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The statements in this Management's Discussion and Analysis that are forward-looking, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, involve numerous risks and uncertainties and are based on current expectations. The reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including those risks discussed under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this document. Often, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words, such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expect," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "continue," "plan," "intend," "project" and other similar terminology, or the negative of such terms. We disclaim any responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking statement provided in this Management's Discussion and Analysis for any reason.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The SEC has defined critical accounting policies as those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require us to make our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, our critical accounting policies include: valuation of marketable securities, which impacts losses on debt and equity securities when we record impairments; revenue recognition, which impacts the recording of revenues; and valuation of inventories, which impacts cost of revenues and gross margin. Our critical accounting policies also include: the assessment of impairment of long-lived assets including acquisition-related intangibles, which impacts their valuation; the assessment of the recoverability of goodwill, which impacts goodwill impairment; accounting for income taxes, which impacts the provision or benefit recognized for income taxes, as well as the valuation of deferred tax assets recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet; and valuation and recognition of stock-based compensation, which impacts gross margin, research and development (R&D) expenses, and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses. For more discussion please refer to "Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in our Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2013 filed with the SEC. We also have other key accounting policies that are not as subjective, and therefore, their application would not require us to make estimates or judgments that are as difficult, but which nevertheless could significantly affect our financial reporting.

Results of Operations: Third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2014 compared to the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013

The following table sets forth statement of income data as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		December 29, 2012
Net revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenues	30.8		33.4		30.8		34.0
Gross margin	69.2		66.6		69.2		66.0
Operating expenses:
Research and development	21.8		25.4		20.7		22.3
Selling, general and administrative	15.7		17.0		15.9		16.8
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles	0.4		0.5		0.4		0.4
Litigation and contingencies	(3.3	)	—		0.5		—
Total operating expenses	34.6		42.9		37.5		39.5
Operating income	34.6		23.7		31.7		26.5
Interest and other expense, net	0.8		1.0		1.5		1.5
Income before income taxes	33.8		22.7		30.2		25.0
Provision for income taxes	3.8		2.4		3.3		3.2
Net income	30.0	%	20.3	%	26.9	%	21.8	%

Table of Contents

Net Revenues

We sell our products to global manufacturers of electronic products in end markets such as wireless and wireline communications, industrial, scientific and medical, aerospace and defense, consumer, automotive, audio, video and broadcast, storage and servers and office automation. The vast majority of our net revenues are generated by sales of our semiconductor products, but we also generate sales from support products. We classify our product offerings into four categories: New, Mainstream, Base and Support Products. The composition of each product category is as follows:


•	New Products include our most recent product offerings and include the Virtex ^® -7, Kintex ^™ -7, Artix ^® -7, Zynq ^™ -7000, Virtex-6 and Spartan ^® -6 product families.


•	Mainstream Products include the Virtex-5, Spartan-3 and CoolRunner™-II product families.


•	Base Products consist of our older product families including the Virtex-4, Virtex-II, Virtex-E, Virtex, Spartan-II, Spartan, CoolRunner and XC9500 products.


•	Support Products include configuration solutions (PROMs), HardWire, software and support services.

These product categories, except for Support Products, are modified on a periodic basis to better reflect the maturity of the products and advances in technology. The most recent modification was made on April 1, 2012, which was the beginning of our fiscal 2013. New Products include our most recent product offerings and are typically designed into our customers’ latest generation of electronic systems. Mainstream Products are generally several years old and designed into customer programs that are currently shipping in full production. Base Products are older than Mainstream Products with demand generated generally by the customers’ oldest systems still in production. Support Products are generally products or services sold in conjunction with our semiconductor devices to aid customers in the design process.

Net revenues of $586.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 represented a 15% increase from the comparable prior year period of $509.8 million . Net revenues from New Products increased significantly in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 versus the comparable prior year period, but were offset by declines from our Mainstream Products. No end customer accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues for any of the periods presented.

For the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , approximately 58% of our net revenues were from products sold to distributors for subsequent resale to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) or their subcontract manufacturers. As of December 28, 2013 , we had $67.8 million of deferred revenue and $19.7 million of deferred cost of revenues recognized as a net $48.1 million of deferred income on shipments to distributors. As of March 30, 2013 , we had $71.3 million of deferred revenue and $17.9 million of deferred cost of revenues recognized as a net $53.4 million of deferred income on shipments to distributors. The deferred income on shipments to distributors that will ultimately be recognized in our condensed consolidated statement of income will be different than the amount shown on the condensed consolidated balance sheet due to actual price adjustments issued to the distributors when the product is sold to their end customers.

Net Revenues by Product

Net revenues by product categories for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and 2013 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013		Change		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		Change		December 29, 2012
New Products	$	224.3	79	%	$	125.5	$	613.1	85	%	$	332.3
Mainstream Products	191.4		(10	)	211.9		603.4		(17	)	724.8
Base Products	151.6		—		151.5		486.6		(6	)	515.4
Support Products	19.5		(7	)	20.9		61.6		(4	)	64
Total net revenues	$	586.8	15		$	509.8	$	1,764.7	8		$	1,636.5

Net revenues from New Products increased significantly both in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The increases were primarily due to significant growth from our 28 nanometer (nm) products as well as increased sales from our 40nm Virtex-6 and our 45nm Spartan-6 product families. We expect sales of our New Products, as currently defined, to continue to grow as more customer programs enter into volume production.

Net revenues from Mainstream Products decreased both in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The decreases were largely due to the decline in sales of our Virtex-5 product family.

Table of Contents

Net revenues from Base Products were essentially flat in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 , but decreased in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The strength from our Virtex-2 product family was offset by the decline in Virtex-4 product family in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 . The decrease in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 was mainly attributable to the decline in sales of our older products, in particular, our Virtex-4 product family.

Net revenues from Support Products decreased both in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The decreases were mainly due to the decline in sales from our PROM products.

Net Revenues by End Markets

Our end market revenue data is derived from our understanding of our end customers’ primary markets. Net revenues by end markets were classified into the following four categories: Communications and Data Center; Industrial, Aerospace and Defense; Broadcast, Consumer and Automotive; and Other. The percentage change calculation in the table below represents the year-to-year dollar change in each end market.

Net revenues by end markets for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and 2013 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
(% of total net revenues)	December 28, 2013		% Change in Dollars	December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		% Change in Dollars		December 29, 2012
Communications and Data Center	44	%	9	47	%	44	%	1		47	%
Industrial, Aerospace and Defense	37		18	36		37		19		34
Broadcast, Consumer and Automotive	16		22	15		16		10		16
Other	3		40	2		3		(19	)	3
Total net revenues	100	%	15	100	%	100	%	8		100	%

Net revenues from the Communications and Data Center end market increased in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods in terms of absolute dollars. The increase in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to growth from both wired and wireless communication applications. For the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , the increase was driven by strength from deployments in wireless communications, partially offset by weaker sales in the wired communication application.

Net revenues from the Industrial, Aerospace and Defense end market increased in both the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The increases were due to broad-based strength from the industrial, aerospace and defense applications, particularly related to strong customer acceptance on our 28nm products, as well as strength from legacy products serving this end market.

Net revenues from the Broadcast, Consumer and Automotive end market increased in the third quarter as well as the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The increases for both comparable periods were mainly due to increases in sales from audio, video and broadcast, and consumer applications. Additionally, net revenues from automotive applications increased for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 but were relatively flat for the first nine months of fiscal 2014 .

Net revenues from the Other end market increased in the third quarter, but decreased in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The increase in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 was mainly attributable to the increase in computing applications. The decrease in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 was attributable to the decline from computing and storage applications

Net Revenues by Geography

Geographic revenue information reflects the geographic location of the distributors, OEMs or contract manufacturers who purchased our products. This may differ from the geographic location of the end customers. Net revenues by geography for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013		Change		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		Change		December 29, 2012
North America	$	170.4	5	%	$	162.8	$	540.2	11	%	$	488.4
Asia Pacific	237.1		36		174.8		673.5		17		573.6
Europe	123.8		4		119.4		392.3		(5	)	412.2
Japan	55.5		5		52.8		158.7		(2	)	162.3
Total net revenues	$	586.8	15		$	509.8	$	1,764.7	8		$	1,636.5

Net revenues in North America increased in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The increases were primarily attributable to stronger sales from Industrial, Aerospace and Defense end market.

Net revenues in Asia Pacific increased in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The increases were primarily due to increases in sales from the Communications and Data Center, Broadcast, Consumer and Automotive and Industrial, Aerospace and Defense end markets.

Net revenues in Europe increased in the third quarter, but declined in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 compared with the comparable prior year periods. The increase in the third quarter was largely due to increased sales from industrial and aerospace and defense applications. The decline in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to decreased sales from wired and wireless communication applications.

Net revenues in Japan increased in the third quarter, but decreased in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The increase in the third quarter was due to increases in sales from the Communications and Data Center, Broadcast, Consumer and Automotive and Industrial, Aerospace and Defense end markets. The decline in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to decreased sales from the Communications and Data Center and Broadcast, Consumer and Automotive end markets.

Gross Margin



	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012
Gross margin	$	406.0		20	%	$	339.3		$	1,221.4		13	%	$	1,079.9
Percentage of net revenues	69.2		%			66.6		%	69.2		%			66.0		%

Gross margin was 2.6 and 3.2 percentage points higher, respectively, in the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods. The gross margin increases in both periods were driven primarily by continued focus on margin expansion and cost reduction across our product portfolio.

New Products generally have lower gross margins than Mainstream and Base Products as they are in the early stage of their product life cycle and have higher unit costs associated with relatively lower volumes and early manufacturing maturity.

Gross margin may be affected in the future due to shifts in the mix of customers and products, competitive-pricing pressure, manufacturing-yield issues and wafer pricing. We will attempt to mitigate any adverse impacts from these factors by continuing to improve yields on our New Products, improve manufacturing efficiencies, and improve average selling price management.

Research and Development



	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012
Research and development	$	128.1		(1	)%	$	129.1		$	364.6		—	%	$	364.4
Percentage of net revenues	22		%			25		%	21		%			22		%

R&D spending decreased slightly by $1.0 million , or 1% , for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year period. For the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , R&D spending was relatively flat from the comparable prior year period. The slight

Table of Contents

decrease in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 was primarily attributable to lower mask and wafer expenses, partially offset by higher employee-related expenses (including employee compensation related to variable spending and stock-based compensation expense).

We plan to continue to selectively invest in R&D efforts in areas such as new products and more advanced process development, IP cores and the development of new design and layout software. We may also consider acquisitions to complement our strategy for technology leadership and engineering resources in critical areas.

Selling, General and Administrative



	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012
Selling, general and administrative	$	91.8		6	%	$	86.8		$	280.5		2	%	$	275.0
Percentage of net revenues	16		%			17		%	16		%			17		%

SG&A expenses increased by $5.0 million and $5.5 million during the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , respectively, from the comparable prior year periods. The increases in both periods were primarily attributable to higher employee-related expenses (including employee compensation related to variable spending and stock-based compensation expense). For the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , the increase was related to higher employee-related expenses, and was partially offset by lower legal expenses.

Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles



	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles	$	2.6		1	%	$	2.6		$	7.4		6	%	$	7.0
Percentage of net revenues	—		%			1		%	—		%			—		%

Amortization expense for the three months ended December 28, 2013 was relatively flat and slightly increased for the nine months ended December 28, 2013 from the comparable prior year periods. The slight increase for the nine months ended December 28, 2013 was due to the impact of amortization of intangible assets obtained from acquisitions during late fiscal 2013 and 2014.

Litigation and Contingencies

On August 30, 2013, a judge in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, issued a memorandum order finding enhanced damages to be appropriate in the patent infringement suit brought against us by PACT. The judge's order for enhanced damages adjusted the prior $15.4 million award to approximately $38.5 million on the basis of the judge's consideration of applicable factors. On September 3, 2013, the court also issued an order requiring us to pay approximately $2.5 million for PACT's costs and attorneys' fees and an order requiring us to pay approximately $3.0 million for pre- and post-judgment interest. The court denied without prejudice PACT’s motion for ongoing royalties on our sales from May 2012 and onwards which are subject to the patents in suit, and ordered the parties to negotiate resolution of the future royalty rate on such sales. Final judgment in the case was issued on September 4, 2013.

On October 2, 2013, we filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division of its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On December 19, 2013, we entered into a Settlement and License Agreement with PACT. Under the settlement, the parties agreed to dismiss with prejudice all outstanding patent litigation between Xilinx, Avnet and PACT and Xilinx agreed to pay PACT a lump sum of $33.5 million. In addition, we received a license to all patents owned or controlled by PACT. On December 23, 2013, the trial court dismissed the suit and on December 27, 2013, the court of appeals dismissed the appeal.

We previously recorded charges of $15.4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and $28.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2014, for a total accrual of $44.0 million. Due to the settlement on December 19, 2013, in the third quarter of fiscal 2014

Table of Contents

we reversed the initial $44.0 million accrual, and recorded $24.8 million of the $33.5 million settlement as a current period charge to the condensed consolidated statements of income. The remainder of the settlement will be amortized in future periods.

Stock-Based Compensation



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013		Change		December 29, 2012		December 28, 2013		Change		December 29, 2012
Stock-based compensation included in:
Cost of revenues	$	2.0	30	%	$	1.5	$	5.6	19	%	$	4.7
Research and development	11.9		23	%	9.7		33.5		21	%	27.7
Selling, general and administrative	10.5		22	%	8.6		29.3		21	%	24.2
	$	24.4	23	%	$	19.8	$	68.4	21	%	$	56.6

The increases in stock-based compensation expense for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year periods were primarily related to higher expense associated with RSUs, as we granted more RSUs at a higher fair value in the recent years. The higher expense from RSUs was partially offset by lower expenses related to stock option grants as we granted a fewer number of stock options in the current fiscal year.

Interest and Other Expense, Net



	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012
Interest and other expense, net	$	4.8		(7	)%	$	5.1		$	25.7		4	%	$	24.8
Percentage of net revenues	1		%			1		%	1		%			2		%

Our net interest and other expense decreased slightly by $342 thousand in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 , but increased slightly by $900 thousand in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , from the comparable prior year periods. The slight decrease in net interest and other expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to higher interest income earned from our investment portfolios, while the slight increase in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to higher amortization expense from investments in low-income housing.

Provision for Income Taxes



	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012			December 28, 2013			Change		December 29, 2012
Provision for income taxes	$	22.1		83	%	$	12.0		$	59.3		15	%	$	51.8
Percentage of net revenues	4		%			2		%	3		%			3		%
Effective tax rate	11		%			10		%	11		%			13		%

The difference between the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and our effective tax rate in all periods was primarily due to income earned in lower tax rate jurisdictions, for which no U.S. income tax had been provided, as we intend to permanently reinvest these earnings outside of the U.S.

The increase in the effective tax rate in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year period was primarily attributable to a difference in the amount of reserves released for uncertain tax positions in the two periods. In each period there were lapses of statutes of limitation and the amount for fiscal 2014 was smaller than the amount for fiscal 2013. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in the rate, attributable to the reinstatement of the U.S. Federal research tax credit on January 2, 2013. The decrease in effective tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2014 from the comparable prior year period was primarily attributable to the reinstatement of the U.S. Federal research tax credit.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically used a combination of cash flows from operations and equity and debt financing to support ongoing business activities, acquire or invest in critical or complementary technologies, purchase facilities and capital equipment, repurchase our

Table of Contents

common stock and debentures under our repurchase program, pay dividends and finance working capital. Additionally, our investments in debt securities are available for future sale.

The combination of cash, cash equivalents as well as short-term and long-term investments as of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 totaled $3.74 billion and $3.37 billion , respectively. As of December 28, 2013 , we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $2.46 billion and working capital of $1.52 billion . As of March 30, 2013 , cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $1.71 billion and working capital was $1.91 billion . The decrease in working capital balance as of December 28, 2013 from the balance as of March 30, 2013 was primarily due to the reclassification of our convertible debentures as a current liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheet (see "Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility" to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. “Financial Information,” for additional information).

As of December 28, 2013 , we had $1.82 billion of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held by our non-U.S. jurisdictions. From a financial statement perspective, approximately $869.6 million of the $1.82 billion held by our non-U.S. jurisdictions was available for use in the U.S. without incurring additional U.S. income taxes in excess of the amounts already accrued in our financial statements as of December 28, 2013 . The remaining amount of non-U.S. cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments had been permanently reinvested and, therefore, no U.S. current or deferred taxes had been accrued and this amount was intended for investment in our operations outside the U.S. We believe our U.S. sources of cash and liquidity are sufficient to meet our business needs in the U.S. and do not expect that we will need to repatriate the funds we have designated as permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Under current tax laws, should our plans change and we were to choose to repatriate some or all of the funds we have designated as permanently reinvested outside the U.S., such amounts would be subject to U.S. income taxes and applicable non-U.S. income and withholding taxes.

Operating Activities — During the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , our operations generated net positive cash flow of $615.5 million , which was $132.7 million higher than the $482.9 million generated during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 . The positive cash flow from operations generated during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 was primarily from net income as adjusted for non-cash related items, increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, as well as a decrease in accounts receivable. These items were partially offset by a decrease in income taxes payable, as well as increase in inventory. Accounts receivable decreased by $21.9 million and days sales outstanding (DSO) decreased to 32 days at December 28, 2013 from 38 days at March 30, 2013 due to lower shipments. Our inventory levels were $5.5 million higher at December 28, 2013 compared to March 30, 2013 . Combined inventory days at Xilinx and distribution increased to 114 days at December 28, 2013 from 108 days at March 30, 2013 . While we were able to manage our inventory and reduce the combined inventory days in the past few quarters, the combined inventory days as of March 30, 2013 and December 28, 2013 were still relatively higher than historical trends due to build ahead of a number of legacy parts in response to the previously planned closure of a particular foundry process line and the build ahead of our 28nm products in anticipation of ramping sales. We expect to ship the vast majority of these parts over the next two years.

For the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , the net positive cash flow from operations was primarily from net income as adjusted for non-cash related items, decreases in deferred income taxes and prepaid expenses and other current assets, as well as increases in in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. These items were partially offset by increases in inventories, accounts receivable and other assets, as well as decreases in deferred income on shipments to distributors and income taxes payable.

Investing Activities — Net cash used in investing activities of $397.4 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 consisted of net purchases of available-for-sale securities of $393.8 million and $30.7 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by $27.1 million net cash received from other investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities of $336.4 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 consisted of net purchases of available-for-sale securities of $280.0 million , $32.3 million for other investing activities and $24.1 million for purchases of property, plant equipment.

Financing Activities — Net cash used in financing activities was $209.8 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 and consisted of $200.3 million of dividend payments to stockholders and $167.1 million in repurchase of common stocks, offset by $137.4 million of net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under employee stock plans and $20.2 million for the excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation. For the comparable fiscal 2013 period, net cash used in financing activities was $312.1 million and consisted of $197.8 million of repurchase of common stock and $172.6 million for dividend payments to stockholders, offset by $52.0 million proceeds from the issuance of common stock under employee stock plans and $6.3 million for the excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation.

Temporary and stockholders’ equity increased $313.7 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 . The increase was primarily attributable to $474.4 million in net income for the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , $137.4 million of issuance of common stock under employee stock plans and $68.4 million of stock-based compensation. The increase was partially offset by $200.3 million of payment of dividends to stockholders and $167.1 million in repurchase of common stocks. See "Note 10. Convertible Debentures

Table of Contents

and Revolving Credit Facility" to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. "Financial Information," for additional information about our debentures that impacted our temporary and stockholders' equity.

Contractual Obligations

We lease some of our facilities, office buildings and land under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through October 2021 . See "Note 15. Commitments" to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. "Financial Information," for a schedule of our operating lease commitments as of December 28, 2013 and additional information about operating leases.

Due to the nature of our business, we depend entirely upon subcontractors to manufacture our silicon wafers and provide assembly and some test services. The lengthy subcontractor lead times require us to order the materials and services in advance, and we are obligated to pay for the materials and services when completed. As of December 28, 2013 , we had $151.3 million of outstanding inventory and other non-cancelable purchase obligations to subcontractors. We expect to receive and pay for these materials and services in the next three to six months, as the products meet delivery and quality specifications. As of December 28, 2013 , we also had $27.1 million of non-cancelable license obligations to providers of electronic design automation software and hardware/software maintenance expiring at various dates through December 2016 .

We committed up to $5.0 million to acquire, in the future, rights to IP until July 2023 . License payments will be amortized over the useful life of the IP acquired.

As of December 28, 2013 , we had $689.6 million of 3.125% Debentures outstanding. The 3.125% Debentures require payment of interest semiannually on March 15 and September 15 of each year. We also had another $600.0 million of 2.625% Debentures outstanding. The 2.625% Debentures require payment of interest semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year. As of December 28, 2013 , these debentures were convertible at the option of the holders. See "Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility" to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. "Financial Information," for additional information about our debentures.

As of December 28, 2013 , $10.6 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties were classified as long-term income taxes payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Due to the inherent uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash outflows associated with such liabilities, we are unable to reliably estimate the timing of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

As of December 28, 2013 , we did not have any significant off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash generated from operations is used as our primary source of liquidity and capital resources. Our investment portfolio is also available for future cash requirements as is our $250.0 million revolving credit facility entered into in December 2011 (expiring in December 2016 ). We are not aware of any lack of access to the revolving credit facility; however, we can provide no assurance that access to the revolving credit facility will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets. Our revolving credit facility is not reliant upon a single bank. There have been no borrowings to date under our existing revolving credit facility.

We repurchased 3.7 million shares of our common stock for $167.1 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 (see "Note 11. Common Stock Repurchase Program" to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. "Financial Information," for additional information). We used $197.8 million of cash to repurchase 6.2 million shares of common stock during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 . During the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , we paid $200.3 million in cash dividends to stockholders, representing $0.75 per common share. During the first nine months of fiscal 2013 , we paid $172.6 million in cash dividends to stockholders, representing $0.66 per common share. On January 20, 2014 , our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per common share for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 . The dividend is payable on February 27, 2014 to stockholders of record on February 6, 2014 . Our common stock and debentures repurchase program and dividend policy could be impacted by, among other items, our views on potential future capital requirements relating to R&D, investments and acquisitions, legal risks, principal and interest payments on our debentures and other strategic investments.

We anticipate that existing sources of liquidity and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our cash needs for the foreseeable future. We will continue to evaluate opportunities for investments to obtain additional wafer capacity, to procure additional capital equipment and facilities, to develop new products, and to potentially acquire technologies or businesses that could complement our business. However, the risk factors discussed in Item 1A included in Part II. "Other Information" and below could affect our cash positions adversely. In addition, certain types of investments such as auction rate securities may present risks

Table of Contents

arising from liquidity and/or credit concerns. In the event that our investments in auction rate securities become illiquid, we do not expect this will materially affect our liquidity and capital resources or results of operations.


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio, which consists of fixed income securities with a fair value of approximately $3.53 billion as of December 28, 2013 . Our primary aim with our investment portfolio is to invest available cash while preserving principal and meeting liquidity needs. Our investment portfolio includes municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, bank certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds, student loan auction rate securities, U.S. and foreign government and agency securities and a debt mutual fund. In accordance with our investment policy, we place investments with high credit quality issuers and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer based upon the issuer’s credit rating. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates increase. A hypothetical 100 basis-point (one percentage point) increase or decrease in interest rates compared to rates at December 28, 2013 would have affected the fair value of our investment portfolio by less than $56.0 million.

Credit Market Risk

The global credit markets may experience adverse conditions that negatively impact the values of various types of investment and non-investment grade securities. The global credit and capital markets may experience significant volatility and disruption due to instability in the global financial system, uncertainty related to global economic conditions and concerns regarding sovereign financial stability. Therefore, there is a risk that we may incur other-than-temporary impairment charges for certain types of investments should credit market conditions deteriorate. See "Note 5. Financial Instruments" to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. "Financial Information," for additional information about our investments.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Sales to all direct OEMs and distributors are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts that are designated as hedges of anticipated transactions, for which a firm commitment has been attained and the hedged relationship has been effective, are deferred and included in income or expenses in the same period that the underlying transaction is settled. Gains and losses on any instruments not meeting the above criteria are recognized in income or expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of income as they are incurred.

We enter into forward currency exchange contracts to hedge our overseas operating expenses and other liabilities when deemed appropriate. As of December 28, 2013 and March 30, 2013 , we had the following outstanding forward currency exchange contracts (in notional amount):



(In thousands and U.S. dollars)	December 28, 2013		March 30, 2013
Singapore Dollar	$	61,031	$	70,197
Euro	44,433		39,865
Indian Rupee	17,457		16,941
British Pound	10,811		11,602
Japanese Yen	9,057		10,891
	$	142,789	$	149,496

As part of our strategy to reduce volatility of operating expenses due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, we employ a hedging program with forward outlook of up to two years for major foreign-currency-denominated operating expenses. The outstanding forward currency exchange contracts expire at various dates between January 2014 and November 2015 . The net unrealized losses, which approximate the fair market value of the forward currency exchange contracts, are expected to be realized and reclassified into net income within the next two years.

Our investments in several of our wholly-owned subsidiaries are recorded in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As the financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated at each quarter end during consolidation, fluctuations of exchange rates between the foreign currency and the U.S. dollar increase or decrease the value of those investments. These fluctuations are recorded within stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Other monetary foreign-denominated assets and liabilities are revalued on a monthly basis with gains and losses on revaluation reflected in net income. A hypothetical 10% favorable or unfavorable change in foreign currency exchange rates at December 28, 2013 would have affected the annualized foreign-currency-denominated operating expenses of our foreign subsidiaries by less than $10.0 million. In addition, a hypothetical 10% favorable or unfavorable change in foreign currency exchange rates compared to rates at December 28, 2013 would have affected the value of foreign-currency-denominated cash and investments by less than $5.0 million.

Table of Contents


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. These controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal controls are procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that: transactions are properly authorized; assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use; and transactions are properly recorded and reported, to permit the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with its policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We continuously evaluate our internal controls and make changes to improve them as necessary. Our intent is to maintain our disclosure controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.

An evaluation was carried out, under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended December 28, 2013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents


PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Patent Litigation

On December 28, 2007, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by PACT against Xilinx in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (PACT XPP Technologies, AG. v. Xilinx, Inc. and Avnet, Inc. Case No. 2:07-CV-563). The lawsuit pertained to eleven different patents and PACT sought injunctive relief, damages including enhanced damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. Nine of the eleven patents were dismissed from the case prior to trial. Trial commenced in the matter on May 14, 2012 and on May 18, 2012 the jury concluded its deliberations. The jury found five claims of the two patents held by PACT were valid and were willfully infringed by us. The jury awarded PACT the sum of $15.4 million as damages and royalties on past Xilinx sales from March 2002 to May 2012. On August 30, 2013, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, issued a memorandum order finding enhanced damages to be appropriate in the patent infringement suit brought against us. The judge’s order for enhanced damages adjusted the jury award to approximately $38.5 million on the basis of the judge’s consideration of applicable factors. On September 3, 2013, the court also issued an order requiring us to pay approximately $2.5 million for PACT’s costs and attorneys’ fees and an order requiring us to pay approximately $3.0 million for pre- and post-judgment interest. The court denied without prejudice PACT’s motion for ongoing royalties on Xilinx sales from May 2012 and onwards which are subject to the patents in suit, and ordered the parties to negotiate resolution of the future royalty rate on such Xilinx sales. Final judgment in the case was issued on September 4, 2013.

On February 14, 2011, we filed a complaint for declaratory judgment of patent non-infringement and invalidity against Intellectual Ventures in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. On September 30, 2011, we amended our complaint in this case to eliminate certain defendants and patents from the action (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Case No CV11-0671). The lawsuit pertains to one patent and seeks judgment of non-infringement by Xilinx and judgment that the patent is invalid and unenforceable, as well as costs and attorneys’ fees.

On February 15, 2011, Intellectual Ventures added us as a defendant in its complaint for patent infringement previously filed against Altera, Microsemi and Lattice in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Altera Corporation, Microsemi Corporation, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Xilinx, Inc., Case No. 10-CV-1065). The lawsuit pertains to five patents, four of which we are alleged to be infringing. Intellectual Ventures seeks unspecified damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit is currently scheduled to go to trial in May 2014. We are unable to estimate our range of possible loss in this matter at this time.

On October 17, 2011, we filed a complaint for patent non-infringement and invalidity and violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Intellectual Ventures and related entities as well as additional defendants (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures, LLC. Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC, Detelle Relay KG, LLC, Roldan Block NY LLC, Latrosse Technologies LLC, TR Technologies Foundation LLC, Taichi Holdings, LLC, Noregin Assets N.V., LLC and Intellectual Venture Funding LLC Case No CV-04407). By order dated January 25, 2012, the Court granted with leave to amend defendants' motion to dismiss our claim for violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17200. We have amended our complaint to remove the claim for violation of California Business and Professions Code section 17200. The remainder of the lawsuit pertains to two patents and seeks judgments of non-infringement by us and judgments that the patents are invalid and unenforceable, as well as costs and attorneys’ fees.

On November 5, 2012, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by Mosaid against us in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc., Case No. 6:12-CV-00847). The lawsuit pertains to five patents and Mosaid seeks unspecified damages, costs, fees, royalties and injunctive relief and the proceedings are in their early stages. We are unable to estimate our range of possible loss in this matter at this time.

We intend to continue to protect and defend our IP vigorously.

Other Matters

Table of Contents

Except as stated above, there are no pending legal proceedings of a material nature to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject.

From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These include disputes and lawsuits related to IP, mergers and acquisitions, licensing, contract law, tax, regulatory, distribution arrangements, employee relations and other matters. Periodically, we review the status of each matter and assess its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and a range of possible losses can be estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we continue to reassess the potential liability related to pending claims and litigation and may revise estimates.


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors and other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks to the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company’s management currently deems immaterial also may impair its business operations. If any of the risks described below were to occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

There have been no material changes to our risk factors from those previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 .

Our success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products and failure to do so would have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to develop and introduce new products that address customer requirements and compete effectively on the basis of price, density, functionality, power consumption and performance. The success of new product introductions is dependent upon several factors, including:


•	timely completion of new product designs;


•	ability to generate new design opportunities and design wins;


•	availability of specialized field application engineering resources supporting demand creation and customer adoption of new products;


•	ability to utilize advanced manufacturing process technologies on circuit geometries of 28nm and smaller;


•	achieving acceptable yields;


•	ability to obtain adequate production capacity from our wafer foundries and assembly and test subcontractors;


•	ability to obtain advanced packaging;


•	availability of supporting software design tools;


•	utilization of predefined IP logic;


•	customer acceptance of advanced features in our new products; and


•	market acceptance of our customers’ products.

Our product development efforts may not be successful, our new products may not achieve industry acceptance and we may not achieve the necessary volume of production that would lead to further per unit cost reductions. Revenues relating to our mature products are expected to decline in the future, which is normal for our product life cycles. As a result, we may be increasingly dependent on revenues derived from design wins for our newer products as well as anticipated cost reductions in the manufacture of our current products. We rely primarily on obtaining yield improvements and corresponding cost reductions in the manufacture of existing products, and on introducing new products that incorporate advanced features and other price/performance factors that enable us to increase revenues while maintaining consistent margins. To the extent that such cost reductions and new product introductions do not occur in a timely manner, or to the extent that our products do not achieve market acceptance at prices with higher margins, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We rely on independent foundries for the manufacture of all of our products and a manufacturing problem or insufficient foundry capacity could adversely affect our operations.

Table of Contents

Most of our wafers are manufactured in Taiwan by United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC), and by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) for our newest products. In addition, we also have wafers manufactured in South Korea by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (Samsung). Terms with respect to the volume and timing of wafer production and the pricing of wafers produced by the semiconductor foundries are determined by periodic negotiations between Xilinx and these wafer foundries, which usually result in short-term agreements that do not provide for long-term supply or allocation commitments. We are dependent on these foundries, especially UMC, which supplies the substantial majority of our wafers. We rely on UMC, TSMC and our other foundries to produce wafers with competitive performance attributes. Therefore, the foundries, particularly TSMC who manufactures our newest products, must be able to transition to advanced manufacturing process technologies and increased wafer sizes, produce wafers at acceptable yields and deliver them in a timely manner. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that the foundries that supply our wafers will offer us competitive pricing terms or other commercial terms important to our business.

We cannot guarantee that our foundries will not experience manufacturing problems, including delays in the realization of advanced manufacturing process technologies or difficulties due to limitations of new and existing process technologies. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee the foundries will be able to manufacture sufficient quantities of our products or that they will continue to manufacture a product for the full life of the product. In addition, weak economic conditions may adversely impact the financial health and viability of the foundries and result in their insolvency or their inability to meet their commitments to us. For example, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we experienced supply shortages due to the difficulties encountered by the foundries when they had to rapidly increase their production capacities from low utilization levels to high utilization levels because of an unexpected increase in demand. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and first nine months of fiscal 2011, we also experienced supply shortages due to very strong demand for our products and a surge in demand for semiconductors in general, which led to tightening of foundry capacity across the industry. The insolvency of a foundry or any significant manufacturing problem or insufficient foundry capacity would disrupt our operations and negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

We have established other sources of wafer supply for many of our products in an effort to secure a continued supply of wafers. However, establishing, maintaining and managing multiple foundry relationships require the investment of management resources as well as additional costs. If we do not manage these relationships effectively, it could adversely affect our results of operations.

General economic conditions and the related deterioration in the global business environment could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

During the past five years, global consumer confidence eroded amidst concerns over declining asset values, inflation, volatility in energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, rising unemployment, and the stability and solvency of financial institutions, financial markets, businesses and sovereign nations, among other concerns. These concerns slowed global economic growth and resulted in recessions in numerous countries, including many of those in North America, Europe and Asia. The financial condition of sovereign nations, particularly in Europe, is of continuing concern as the sovereign debt crisis remains unresolved. Recent events have also elevated concerns that macroeconomic conditions will worsen and economic recovery will be delayed. These weak economic conditions resulted in reduced customer demand and had a negative impact on our results of operations for the second and third quarter of fiscal 2012 and the third quarter of fiscal 2013. If weak economic conditions persist or worsen, a number of negative effects on our business could continue, including customers or potential customers reducing or delaying orders, the insolvency of key suppliers, potentially causing production delays, the inability of customers to obtain credit, and the insolvency of one or more customers. Any of these effects could impact our ability to effectively manage inventory levels and collect receivables and ultimately decrease our net revenues and profitability.

The semiconductor industry is characterized by cyclical market patterns and a significant industry downturn could adversely affect our operating results.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and our financial performance has been affected by downturns in the industry. Down cycles are generally characterized by price erosion and weaker demand for our products. Weaker demand for our products resulting from economic conditions in the end markets we serve and reduced capital spending by our customers can result, and in the past has resulted, in excess and obsolete inventories and corresponding inventory write-downs. We attempt to identify changes in market conditions as soon as possible; however, the dynamics of the market in which we operate make prediction of and timely reaction to such events difficult. Due to these and other factors, our past results are not reliable predictors of our future results.

The nature of our business makes our revenues difficult to predict which could have an adverse impact on our business.

In addition to the challenging market conditions we may face, we have limited visibility into the demand for our products, particularly new products, because demand for our products depends upon our products being designed into our end customers’ products and those products achieving market acceptance. Due to the complexity of our customers’ designs, the design to volume production process for our customers requires a substantial amount of time, frequently longer than a year. In addition, we are dependent upon "turns," orders received and turned for shipment in the same quarter. These factors make it difficult for us to forecast future sales and project quarterly revenues. The difficulty in forecasting future sales impairs our ability to project our inventory requirements, which could result, and in the past has resulted, in inventory write-downs or failure to meet customer

Table of Contents

product demands in a timely manner. In addition, difficulty in forecasting revenues compromises our ability to provide forward-looking revenue and earnings guidance.

If we are not able to successfully compete in our industry, our financial results and future prospects will be adversely affected.

Our Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs) compete in the logic integrated circuits (IC) industry, an industry that is intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change, increasing levels of integration, product obsolescence and continuous price erosion. We expect increased competition from our primary PLD competitors, Altera, Lattice and Microsemi, and from new market entrants. In addition, competition from the application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) market and from the application specific standard products (ASSP) market continues. We believe that important competitive factors in the logic IC industry include:


•	product pricing;


•	time-to-market;


•	product performance, reliability, quality, power consumption and density;


•	field upgradeability;


•	adaptability of products to specific applications;


•	ease of use and functionality of software design tools;


•	availability and functionality of predefined IP logic;


•	inventory and supply chain management;


•	access to leading-edge process technology and assembly capacity; and


•	ability to provide timely customer service and support.

Our strategy for expansion in the logic market includes continued introduction of new product architectures that address high-volume, low-cost and low-power applications as well as high-performance, high-density applications. However, we may not be successful in executing this strategy. In addition, we anticipate continued pressure from our customers to reduce prices, which may outpace our ability to lower the cost for established products.

Other competitors include manufacturers of:


•	high-density programmable logic products characterized by FPGA type architectures;


•	high-volume and low-cost FPGAs as programmable replacements for ASICs and ASSPs;


•	ASICs and ASSPs with incremental amounts of embedded programmable logic;


•	high-speed, low-density complex programmable logic devices;


•	high-performance digital signal processing devices;


•	products with embedded processors;


•	products with embedded multi-gigabit transceivers; and


•	other new or emerging programmable logic products.

Several companies have introduced products that compete with ours or have announced their intention to sell PLD products. To the extent that our efforts to compete are not successful, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The benefits of programmable logic have attracted a number of competitors to this segment. We recognize that different applications require different programmable technologies, and we are developing architectures, processes and products to meet these varying customer needs. Recognizing the increasing importance of standard software solutions, we have developed common software design tools that support the full range of our IC products. We believe that automation and ease of design are significant competitive factors in this segment.

We could also face competition from our licensees. In the past we have granted limited rights to other companies with respect to certain aspects of our older technology, and we may do so in the future. Granting such rights may enable these companies to manufacture and market products that may be competitive with some of our older products.

Increased costs of wafers and materials, or shortages in wafers and materials, could adversely impact our gross margins and lead to reduced revenues.

If greater demand for wafers is not offset by an increase in foundry capacity, market demand for wafers or production and assembly materials increases, or if a supplier of our wafers ceases or suspends operations, our supply of wafers and other materials could

Table of Contents

become limited. Such shortages raise the likelihood of potential wafer price increases, wafer shortages or shortages in materials at production and test facilities, resulting in potential inability to address customer product demands in a timely manner. For example, as a result of the March 2011 earthquake in Japan, certain suppliers were forced to temporarily halt production, resulting in a tightening of supply for those materials. Such shortages of wafers and materials as well as increases in wafer or materials prices could adversely affect our gross margins and would adversely affect our ability to meet customer demands and lead to reduced revenue.

We depend on distributors, primarily Avnet, to generate a majority of our sales and complete order fulfillment.

Resale of product through Avnet accounted for 47% of our worldwide net revenues in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 , and as of December 28, 2013 , Avnet accounted for 55% of our total net accounts receivable. Any adverse change to our relationship with Avnet or our remaining distributors could have a material impact on our business. Furthermore, if a key distributor materially defaults on a contract or otherwise fails to perform, our business and financial results would suffer. In addition, we are subject to concentrations of credit risk in our trade accounts receivable, which includes accounts of our distributors. A significant reduction of effort by a distributor to sell our products or a material change in our relationship with one or more distributors may reduce our access to certain end customers and adversely affect our ability to sell our products.

In addition, the financial health of our distributors and our continuing relationships with them are important to our success. Unpredictable economic conditions may adversely impact the financial health of some of these distributors, particularly our smaller distributors. This could result in the insolvency of certain distributors, the inability of distributors to obtain credit to finance the purchase of our products, or cause distributors to delay payment of their obligations to us and increase our credit risk exposure. Our business could be harmed if the financial health of these distributors impairs their performance and we are unable to secure alternate distributors.

We are dependent on independent subcontractors for most of our assembly and test services, and unavailability or disruption of these services could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on subcontractors to provide semiconductor assembly, substrate, test and shipment services. Any prolonged inability to obtain wafers with competitive performance and cost attributes, adequate yields or timely delivery, any disruption in assembly, test or shipment services, delays in stabilizing manufacturing processes and ramping up volume for new products, transitions to new service providers or any other circumstance that would require us to seek alternative sources of supply, could delay shipments and have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet customer demands. In addition, unpredictable economic conditions may adversely impact the financial health and viability of these subcontractors and result in their insolvency or their inability to meet their commitments to us. These factors would result in reduced net revenues and could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

A number of factors, including our inventory strategy, can impact our gross margins.

A number of factors, including yield, wafer pricing, product mix, market acceptance of our new products, competitive pricing dynamics, geographic and/or market segment pricing strategies can cause our gross margins to fluctuate. In addition, forecasting our gross margins is difficult because a significant portion of our business is based on turns within the same quarter.

Our current inventory levels are higher than historical norms due to our decision to build ahead of a previously planned closure of a particular foundry process line at one of our foundry partners, weaker than anticipated sales and a planned increase in safety stock across newer technologies in anticipation of future revenue growth. In the event demand does not materialize, we may be subject to incremental obsolescence costs. In addition, future product cost reductions could have an increased impact on our inventory valuation, which would then impact our operating results.

Reductions in the average selling prices of our products could have a negative impact on our gross margins.

The average selling prices of our products generally decline as the products mature. We seek to offset the decrease in selling prices through yield improvement, manufacturing cost reductions and increased unit sales. We also continue to develop higher value products or product features that increase, or slow the decline of, the average selling price of our products. However, there is no guarantee that our ongoing efforts will be successful or that they will keep pace with the decline in selling prices of our products, which could ultimately lead to a decline in revenues and have a negative effect on our gross margins.

Because of our international business and operations, we are vulnerable to the economic conditions of the countries in which we operate and currency fluctuations could have a material adverse affect on our business and negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition to our U.S. operations, we also have significant international operations, including foreign sales offices to support our international customers and distributors, our regional headquarters in Ireland and Singapore and an R&D site in India. Our international operations have grown because we have established certain operations and administrative functions outside the U.S. Sales and operations outside of the U.S. subject us to the risks associated with conducting business in foreign economic and regulatory environments. Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by unfavorable economic conditions in countries in which we do significant business or by changes in foreign currency exchange rates affecting those

Table of Contents

countries. We derive over one-half of our revenues from international sales, primarily in the Asia Pacific region, Europe and Japan. Past economic weaknesses in these markets adversely affected revenues. Sales to all direct OEMs and distributors are denominated in U.S. dollars. While the recent movements of the Euro and Yen exchange rates against the U.S. dollar had no material impact to our business, increased volatility could impact our European and Japanese customers. Currency instability and volatility and disruptions in the credit and capital markets may increase credit risks for some of our customers and may impair our customers’ ability to repay existing obligations. Increased currency volatility could also positively or negatively impact our foreign-currency-denominated costs, assets and liabilities. In addition, any devaluation of the U.S. dollar relative to other foreign currencies may increase the operating expenses of our foreign subsidiaries adversely affecting our results of operations. Furthermore, because we are increasingly dependent on the global economy, instability in worldwide economic environments occasioned, for example, by political instability, terrorist activity or U.S. or other military actions could adversely impact economic activity and lead to a contraction of capital spending by our customers. Any or all of these factors could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations in the future.

We are subject to the risks associated with conducting business operations outside of the U.S. which could adversely affect our business.

In addition to international sales and support operations and development activities, we purchase our wafers from foreign foundries and have our commercial products assembled, packaged and tested by subcontractors located outside the U.S. All of these activities are subject to the uncertainties associated with international business operations, including tax laws and regulations, trade barriers, economic sanctions, import and export regulations, duties and tariffs and other trade restrictions, changes in trade policies, anti-corruption laws, foreign governmental regulations, potential vulnerability of and reduced protection for IP, longer receivable collection periods and disruptions or delays in production or shipments, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Additional factors that could adversely affect us due to our international operations include rising oil prices and increased costs of natural resources. Moreover, our financial condition and results of operations could be affected in the event of political conflicts or economic crises in countries where our main wafer providers, end customers and contract manufacturers who provide assembly and test services worldwide, are located. Adverse change to the circumstances or conditions of our international business operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and changes in credit rating and in the market values of our portfolio investments which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our cash, short-term and long-term investments represent significant assets that may be subject to fluctuating or even negative returns depending upon interest rate movements, changes in credit rating and financial market conditions. The global credit markets may experience adverse conditions that negatively impact the values of various types of investment and non-investment grade securities. The global credit and capital markets may experience significant volatility and disruption due to instability in the global financial system, uncertainty related to global economic conditions and concerns regarding sovereign financial stability.

Therefore, there is a risk that we may incur other-than-temporary impairment charges for certain types of investments should credit market conditions deteriorate or the underlying assets fail to perform as anticipated. Our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or if the decline in fair values of our debt securities is judged to be other than temporary. Furthermore, we may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates or financial market conditions.

Our failure to protect and defend our IP could impair our ability to compete effectively.

We rely upon patent, copyright, trade secret, mask work and trademark laws to protect our IP. We cannot provide assurance that such IP rights can be successfully asserted in the future or will not be invalidated, violated, circumvented or challenged. From time to time, third parties, including our competitors, have asserted against us patent, copyright and other IP rights to technologies that are important to us. Third parties may attempt to misappropriate our IP through electronic or other means or assert infringement claims against our indemnitees or us in the future. Such assertions by third parties may result in costly litigation, indemnity claims or other legal actions, and we may not prevail in such matters or be able to license any valid and infringed patents from third parties on commercially reasonable terms. This could result in the loss of our ability to import and sell our products or require us to pay costly royalties to third parties in connection with sales of our products. Any infringement claim, indemnification claim, or impairment or loss of use of our IP could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to design and introduce new products in a timely manner is dependent upon third-party IP.

In the design and development of new products and product enhancements, we rely on third-party IP such as software development tools and hardware testing tools. Furthermore, certain product features may rely on IP acquired from third parties. The design requirements necessary to meet future consumer demands for more features and greater functionality from semiconductor products may exceed the capabilities of the third-party IP or development tools that are available to us. If the third-party IP that we use becomes unavailable or fails to produce designs that meet consumer demands, our business could be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

We rely on information technology systems, and failure of these systems to function properly or unauthorized access to our systems could result in business disruption.

We rely in part on various information technology (IT) systems to manage our operations, including financial reporting, and we regularly evaluate these systems and make changes to improve them as necessary. Consequently, we periodically implement new, or upgrade or enhance existing, operational and IT systems, procedures and controls. For example, in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 we upgraded the IT systems we use to manage our operations and record and report financial information, and in the past we simplified our supply chain and were required to make certain changes to our IT systems. Any delay in the implementation of, or disruption in the transition to, new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, could harm our ability to record and report financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis. These systems are also subject to power and telecommunication outages or other general system failures. Failure of our IT systems or difficulties in managing them could result in business disruption. We also may be subject to unauthorized access to our IT systems through a security breach or attack. In the past there have been attempts by third parties to penetrate and or infect our network and systems with malicious software, in an effort to gain access to our network and systems. We seek to detect and investigate any security incidents and prevent their recurrence, but in some cases, we might be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects. Our business could be significantly harmed and we could be subject to third party claims in the event of such a security breach.

Earthquakes and other natural disasters could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The independent foundries upon which we rely to manufacture our products, as well as our California and Singapore facilities, are located in regions that are subject to earthquakes and other natural disasters. UMC’s and TSMC's foundries in Taiwan and our assembly and test partners in other regions as well as many of our operations in California are centered in areas that have been seismically active in the recent past and some areas have been affected by other natural disasters such as typhoons. Any catastrophic event in these locations will disrupt our operations, including our manufacturing activities and our insurance may not cover losses resulting from such disruptions of our operations. This type of disruption could result in our inability to manufacture or ship products, thereby materially adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations. For example, as a result of the March 2011 earthquake in Japan, production at the Seiko foundry at Sakata was halted temporarily, impacting production of some of our older devices. In addition, suppliers of wafers and substrates were forced to halt production temporarily. Disruption of operations at these foundries for any reason, including other natural disasters such as typhoons, tsunamis, volcano eruptions, fires or floods, as well as disruptions in access to adequate supplies of electricity, natural gas or water could cause delays in shipments of our products, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, natural disasters can also indirectly impact us. For example, our customers’ supply of other complimentary products may be disrupted by a natural disaster and may cause them to delay orders of our products.

If we are unable to maintain effective internal controls, our stock price could be adversely affected.

We are subject to the ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act). Our controls necessary for continued compliance with the Act may not operate effectively at all times and may result in a material weakness disclosure. The identification of material weaknesses in internal control, if any, could indicate a lack of proper controls to generate accurate financial statements and could cause investors to lose confidence and our stock price to drop.

We compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of, or inability to attract, such personnel would harm us.

We depend on the efforts and abilities of certain key members of management and other technical personnel. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to retain such personnel and attract and retain other highly qualified personnel, particularly product engineers. Competition for such personnel is intense and we may not be successful in hiring or retaining new or existing qualified personnel. From time to time we have effected restructurings which eliminate a number of positions. Even if such personnel are not directly affected by the restructuring effort, such terminations can have a negative impact on morale and our ability to attract and hire new qualified personnel in the future. If we lose existing qualified personnel or are unable to hire new qualified personnel, as needed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed.

Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

From time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise out of the ordinary conduct of our business. The amount of damages alleged in certain legal claims can often be significant. For example, we recently entered into a Settlement and License Agreement with PACT in which the parties agreed to dismiss with prejudice all outstanding patent litigation among us, Avnet and PACT. As part of the settlement, we agreed to pay PACT a lump sum of $33.5 million . Certain other claims are not yet resolved, including those that are discussed under Item 1. "Legal Proceedings," included in Part II of this Form 10-Q, and additional claims may arise in the future. Results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty.

Regardless of its merit, litigation may be both time-consuming and disruptive to our operations and cause significant expense and diversion of management attention and we may enter into material settlements to avoid these risks. Should we fail to prevail in

Table of Contents

certain matters, or should several of these matters be resolved against us in the same reporting period, we may be faced with significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us that would materially and adversely affect a portion of our business and might materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Our products could have defects which could result in reduced revenues and claims against us.

We develop complex and evolving products that include both hardware and software. Despite our testing efforts and those of our subcontractors, defects may be found in existing or new products. These defects may cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair or replacement costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts and harm our relationships with customers. Subject to certain terms and conditions, we have agreed to compensate certain customers for limited specified costs they actually incur in the event our hardware products experience epidemic failure. As a result, epidemic failure and other performance problems could result in claims against us, the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and would likely harm our business. Our customers could also seek damages from us for their losses.

In addition, we could be subject to product liability claims. A product liability claim brought against us, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly to defend. Product liability risks are particularly significant with respect to aerospace, automotive and medical applications because of the risk of serious harm to users of these products. Any product liability claim, whether or not determined in our favor, could result in significant expense, divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, and harm our business.

In preparing our financial statements, we make good faith estimates and judgments that may change or turn out to be erroneous.

In preparing our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., we must make estimates and judgments in applying our most critical accounting policies. Those estimates and judgments have a significant impact on the results we report in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The most difficult estimates and subjective judgments that we make concern valuation of marketable and non-marketable securities, revenue recognition, inventories, long-lived assets including acquisition-related intangibles, goodwill, taxes and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience, input from outside experts and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We also have other key accounting policies that are not as subjective, and therefore, their application would not require us to make estimates or judgments that are as difficult, but which nevertheless could significantly affect our financial reporting. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. If these estimates or their related assumptions change, our operating results for the periods in which we revise our estimates or assumptions could be adversely and perhaps materially affected.

The conditional conversion features of the outstanding debentures, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Our outstanding debentures have conditional conversion features. In the event the conditional conversion features of the debentures are triggered, holders of such debentures will be entitled to convert the debentures at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their debentures, we would be required to settle any converted principal through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. Even if holders do not elect to convert their debentures, as happened during the first half fiscal 2014, we were required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the debentures as a current rather than long-term liability, which resulted in a material reduction of our net working capital. In addition, we were required to increase the number of shares used in our per share calculations to reflect the potentially dilutive impact of the conversion.

Our failure to comply with the requirements of the International Traffic and Arms Regulations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Certain Xilinx space-grade FPGAs and related technologies are subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which are administered by the U.S. Department of State. The ITAR governs the export and reexport of these FPGAs, the transfer of related technical data and the provision of defense services, as well as offshore production, test and assembly. We are required to maintain an internal compliance program and security infrastructure to meet ITAR requirements.

An inability to obtain the required export licenses, or to predict when they will be granted, increases the difficulties of forecasting shipments. In addition, security or compliance program failures that could result in penalties or a loss of export privileges, as well as stringent ITAR licensing restrictions that may make our products less attractive to overseas customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Our inability to effectively control the sale of our products on the gray market could have a material adverse effect on us.

We market and sell our products directly to OEMs and through authorized third-party distributors which helps to ensure that products delivered to our customers are authentic and properly handled. From time to time, customers may purchase products bearing our name from the unauthorized "gray market." These parts may be counterfeit, salvaged or re-marked parts, or parts that

Table of Contents

have been altered, mishandled, or damaged. Gray market products result in shadow inventory that is not visible to us, thus making it difficult to forecast supply or demand. Also, when gray market products enter the market, we and our authorized distributors may compete with brokers of these discounted products, which can adversely affect demand for our products and negatively impact our margins. In addition, our reputation with customers may be negatively impacted when gray market products bearing our name fail or are found to be substandard.

The conflict minerals provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act could result in additional costs and liabilities.

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC established new disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who use "conflict" minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries in their products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. These new requirements could affect the sourcing and availability of minerals used in the manufacture of our semiconductor products. There will also be costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, including for due diligence in regard to the sources of any conflict minerals used in our products, in addition to the cost of remediation and other changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. We may face reputational challenges if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all minerals used in our products through the due diligence process we implement. Moreover, we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the components of our products are certified as conflict free.

Considerable amounts of our common shares are available for issuance under our equity incentive plans and convertible debentures, and significant issuances in the future may adversely impact the market price of our common shares.

As of December 28, 2013 we had 2.00 billion authorized common shares, of which 266.5 million shares were outstanding. In addition, 40.6 million common shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to our equity incentive plans and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 43.7 million common shares were reserved for issuance upon conversion or repurchase of the convertible debentures and 20.0 million common shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of warrants. The availability of substantial amounts of our common shares resulting from the exercise or settlement of equity awards outstanding under our equity incentive plans or the conversion or repurchase of convertible debentures using common shares, which would be dilutive to existing stockholders, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common shares and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities.

We have indebtedness that could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.

The aggregate amount of our consolidated indebtedness as of December 28, 2013 was $1.29 billion (principal amount). We also may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our indebtedness may:


•	make it difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including making scheduled principal and interest payments on the debentures and our other indebtedness;


•	limit our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes;


•	limit our ability to use our cash flow or obtain additional financing for future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general business purposes;


•	require us to use a portion of our cash flow from operations to make debt service payments;


•	limit our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and industry;


•	place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our less leveraged competitors;


•	increase our vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions; and


•	require us to repatriate off-shore cash to the U.S. at unfavorable tax rates.

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend on our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control.

The call options and warrant transactions related to our 2.625% Debentures may affect the value of the debentures and our common stock.

To hedge against potential dilution upon conversion of the 2.625% Debentures, we purchased call options on our common stock from the hedge counterparties. We also sold warrants to the hedge counterparties, which could separately have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share to the extent that the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants of $42.46 per share.

As the hedge counterparties and their respective affiliates modify hedge positions, they may enter or unwind various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchase or sell our common stock in secondary market transactions. This activity also

Table of Contents

could affect the market price of our common stock and/or debentures, which could affect the ability of the holders of the debentures to convert and the number of shares and value of the consideration that will be received by the holders of the debentures upon conversion.

Acquisitions and strategic investments present risks, and we may not realize the goals that were contemplated at the time of a transaction.

We recently acquired technology companies whose products complement our products, and in the past we have made a number of strategic investments in other technology companies. We may make similar acquisitions and strategic investments in the future. Acquisitions and strategic investments present risks, including:


•	our ongoing business may be disrupted and our management’s attention may be diverted by investment, acquisition, transition or integration activities;


•	an acquisition or strategic investment may not further our business strategy as we expected, and we may not integrate an acquired company or technology as successfully as we expected;


•	our operating results or financial condition may be adversely impacted by claims or liabilities that we assume from an acquired company or technology or that are otherwise related to an acquisition;


•	we may have difficulty incorporating acquired technologies or products with our existing product lines;


•	we may have higher than anticipated costs in continuing support and development of acquired products, and in general and administrative functions that support such products;


•	our strategic investments may not perform as expected; and


•	we may experience unexpected changes in how we are required to account for our acquisitions and strategic investments pursuant to U.S. GAAP.

The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition or several concurrent acquisitions or strategic investments.


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

In August 2012, the Board authorized the repurchase of $750.0 million of common stock and debentures through the 2012 Repurchase Program. The 2012 Repurchase Programs have no stated expiration date. Through December 28, 2013 , the Company had used $177.7 million of the $750.0 million authorized under the 2012 Repurchase Program, leaving $572.3 million available for future purchases.

The following table summarizes the Company’s repurchase of its common stock during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 :



(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share
September 30, 2013 to November 2, 2013	—	$	—	—	$	669,461
November 3, 2013 to November 30, 2013	1,357	$	43.89	1,357	$	609,906
December 1, 2013 to December 28, 2013	853	$	44.07	853	$	572,321
Total for the Quarter	2,210			2,210

Table of Contents


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS



31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Items 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



			XILINX, INC.

Date: January 30, 2014			/s/ Jon A. Olson
			Jon A. Olson
			Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (as principal accounting and financial officer and on behalf of Registrant)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part Iprint Item 1. Financial Statementsprint Note 1. Basis Of Presentationprint Note 2. Recent Accounting Changes and Accounting Pronouncementsprint Note 3. Significant Customers and Concentrations Of Credit Riskprint Note 4. Fair Value Measurementsprint Note 5. Financial Instrumentsprint Note 6. Derivative Financial Instrumentsprint Note 7. Stock-based Compensation Plansprint Note 8. Net Income Per Common Shareprint Note 9. Inventoriesprint Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facilityprint Note 11. Common Stock Repurchase Programprint Note 12. Interest and Other Expense, Netprint Note 13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Incomeprint Note 14. Income Taxesprint Note 15. Commitmentsprint Note 16. Product Warranty and Indemnificationprint Note 17. Contingenciesprint Note 18. Goodwill and Acquisition-related Intangiblesprint Note 19. Subsequent Eventprint Item 2. Management S Discussion and Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operationsprint Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Riskprint Item 4. Controls and Proceduresprint Part Ii.other Informationprint Part IIprint Item 1. Legal Proceedingsprint Item 1A. Risk Factorsprint Item 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceedsprint Item 6. Exhibitsprint

FUND	NUMBER OF SHARES	VALUE ($)
CARILLON TOWER ADVISERS, INC.	737,291	104,525
AMUNDI ASSET MANAGEMENT US, INC.	488,806	60,564
Aperio Group, LLC	206,565	29,285
BBVA USA	15,844	2,392
BOARDMAN BAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC	15,000	3,180
Carroll Financial Associates, Inc.	61	13

DIRECTORS	AGE	BIO
Victor Peng	61	Mr. Peng joined the Company in April 2008 and currently serves as Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since January 2018. He joined the Board in October 2017. From April 2017 to January 2018, Mr. Peng served as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. From July 2014 to April 2017, he served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Products. From May 2013 through July 2014, Mr. Peng served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Programmable Platforms Group. From May 2012 through April 2013, he served as Senior Vice President of the Programmable Platforms Group. From November 2008 through April 2012, he served as Senior Vice President of the Programmable Platforms Development Group. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Peng served as Corporate Vice President, Graphics Products Group at Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), a provider of processing solutions, from November 2005 to April 2008. Prior to joining AMD, Mr. Peng served in a variety of executive engineering positions at companies in the semiconductor and processor industries. Mr. Peng also serves on the board of directors of KLA Corporation, a provider of process control and yield management systems for semiconductor manufacturing. As CEO, Mr. Peng offers his strategic vision for the Company and provides an important link between management and the Board, enabling the Board to perform its oversight function with the benefit of management’s perspective. Mr. Peng brings extensive experience in management and engineering with semiconductor companies, strategic transactions, and a deep understanding of the Company’s technology, business, customers and key business drivers, as well as the competitive landscape. As a result, Mr. Peng brings a broad range of skills to the Board, particularly in the area of developing and growing semiconductor and software businesses.
Thomas H Lee	61	Dr. Lee joined the Board in May 2016. Dr. Lee is a Professor of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. He joined the Stanford faculty in 1994 and founded the Stanford Microwave Integrated Circuits Laboratory. From April 2011 through October 2012, he served as the Director of the Microsystems Technology Office at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). He has also co-founded three startups: Matrix Semiconductor, Inc. (acquired by SanDisk), ZeroG Wireless (acquired by Microchip Technology) and Ayla Networks. Dr. Lee received his S.B., S.M. and doctorate of Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has written and co-authored numerous books and papers and is widely recognized for his expertise in high performance analog circuit designs and wireless communications technology. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and has been the recipient of many honors and awards including the United States Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Civilian Service for his service at DARPA. He was also awarded the 2011 Ho-Am Prize in Engineering. He has been granted 65 patents. Dr. Lee also serves on the board of directors of Humatics Corporation, a privately-held company focusing on microlocation technology. Dr. Lee brings to the Board a unique blend of technical expertise pertaining to many of the technology trends shaping the growth of the markets the Company serves, along with entrepreneurial experience and senior leadership capabilities in creating innovative programs in a variety of defense and military communication markets. His extensive knowledge helps the Board shape the Company’s strategic research and development plans and provides valuable insights into the driving technology trends within the Company’s industry and target markets.
Saar Gillai	55	Mr. Gillai joined the Board in May 2016. He has over 25 years of experience in the technology sector and currently advises startups focused on the communications and enterprise space. Mr. Gillai was the Chief Executive Officer of Teridion Inc., a cloud routing optimization company, from October 2017 through December 2019. From September 2015 until November 2016, he served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Hewlett-Packard Enterprise’s Communications Solutions Business. From October 2012 until September 2015, Mr. Gillai served as Senior Vice President, General Manager and Chief Operating Officer of the Cloud business of Hewlett-Packard Company (HP). From May 2010 until October 2012, Mr. Gillai served as Vice President, Advanced Technology Group and Chief Technology Officer of HP Networking. Prior to HP, Mr. Gillai was Senior Vice President of Worldwide Products and Solutions for 3Com Corporation, which was acquired by HP in 2010. Mr. Gillai also has held senior management positions in engineering with Tropos Networks Inc., a provider of wireless mesh products, and senior management positions in product development and operations with Enfora, Inc., a wireless machine-to-machine (M2M) company. In addition, Mr. Gillai served for seven years in a variety of leadership positions with Cisco Systems, Inc., including as Vice President of Engineering for Cisco’s Wireless Networking business unit. Mr. Gillai also serves on the boards of Semtech Corporation, a supplier of analog and mixed-signal semiconductors, and Liquid Instruments (as Chair), a privately-held provider of software-based test and measurement equipment. Mr. Gillai brings to the Board over 20 years of leadership and management experience in product development, engineering, operations and general management with a variety of technology companies. Through this experience, he has gained both technical expertise and strategic insights into a variety of key markets and applications which the Company serves, as well as in-depth understanding of the evolution and adoption of cloud technologies and processes in the enterprise and service provider market.
Ronald S Jankov	62	Mr. Jankov joined the Board in May 2016. He is Chief Executive Officer of GlobalLink1 Capital, an investment firm he founded in 2014. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Jankov served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Processors and Wireless Infrastructure for Broadcom Corporation. From 2000 to 2012, Mr. Jankov was President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc., a fabless provider of semiconductors for networking applications. Under Mr. Jankov’s leadership, NetLogic grew from start-up, through an IPO to market leadership in network processing devices, culminating in the company’s acquisition by Broadcom for $3.7 billion. Mr. Jankov has also held executive management positions with NeoMagic Corporation, a fabless semiconductor company, Cyrix Corporation, a developer of microprocessors, and Accell Technology, a semiconductor company he founded that was later acquired by Cyrix. Mr. Jankov also served in senior management at LSI Logic and began his career at Texas Instruments Inc. Mr. Jankov serves on the boards of Knowles Corporation and several private companies. Mr. Jankov brings to the Board over 35 years of leadership experience in the semiconductor industry and a track record of success growing a business through both organic and inorganic strategies. He has served in senior management roles and on the boards of directors of public and private semiconductor companies. Through his extensive knowledge of the industry, Mr. Jankov brings unique insights that are valuable when evaluating the Company’s product technology, markets and strategic plans and investments.
Raman K Chitkara	62	Mr. Chitkara joined the Board in August 2018. From 1984 until his retirement in June 2018, Mr. Chitkara worked at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), a public accounting firm, where he served as its Global Technology Industry Leader and previously served as the firm’s Global Semiconductor Industry Leader. During his tenure at PwC, he held a number of additional leadership positions, including membership of the Audit Quality Board and Leader of the Global Assurance TICE (Technology, Information, Communication, Entertainment and Media) Practice. Mr. Chitkara also serves on the boards of SiTime Corporation, a supplier of silicon timing solutions, and several private companies. Mr. Chitkara’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience with public and financial accounting matters for complex global organizations. His financial experience enables Mr. Chitkara to contribute meaningfully to the Board’s role in the oversight of our financial reporting, accounting and executive compensation practices. In addition, Mr. Chitkara’s extensive knowledge of the technology sector and semiconductor industry bring valuable insight to the Company’s strategic plans and investments.
Mary Louise Krakauer	64	Ms. Krakauer joined the Company’s Board in October 2017. From September 2016 to December 2016, she served as Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of Dell Corporation, where she was responsible for global IT, including all operations and integration activity. From January 2016 to September 2016, she served as Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of EMC Corporation. Prior to that she served as Executive Vice President, Business Development, Global Enterprise Services for EMC Corporation from June 2015 to December 2015, and as Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources for EMC Corporation from April 2012 to June 2015, where she was responsible for executive, leadership and employee development, compensation and benefits, staffing and all the people-related aspects of acquisition integration. She joined EMC Corporation in 2008 to lead the global Technology Services & Solutions Business, and also subsequently assumed leadership of the global Managed Services Business. Ms. Krakauer has also held executive general management roles at Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Compaq Computer Corporation and Digital Equipment Corporation. Ms. Krakauer also serves on the boards of Mercury Systems, Inc., a commercial provider of secure sensor and safety critical mission processing subsystems, and DXC Technology, a leading independent, end-to-end IT services company. Ms. Krakauer brings to the Board senior leadership, management and operational expertise from her extensive experience gained from serving as an executive at multi-national technology companies. Her knowledge helps the Board shape the Company’s operations and strategic growth plans. Ms. Krakauer also plays a meaningful role in the oversight of the Company’s executive compensation practices.
Jon A Olson	67	Mr. Olson joined the Board in May 2020. Mr. Olson previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company from June 2005 until his retirement in July 2016. While serving as Chief Financial Officer, he also held a variety of other senior management positions at the Company, including most recently as Executive Vice President from May 2014 to July 2016 and, prior to that, Senior Vice President of Finance from August 2006 to May 2014 and Vice President of Finance from June 2005 to August 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Olson spent more than 25 years at Intel Corporation (Intel), serving in a variety of positions from 1979 to 2005, including Vice President of Finance and Enterprise Services and Director of Finance. Mr. Olson also currently serves on each of the board of directors of Kulicke & Soffa, a supplier of semiconductor and electronic assembly solutions and Rocket Lab USA, Inc., a provider of launch and space systems. Mr. Olson served on the board of directors of Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. (Mellanox), a supplier of computer networking products, from June 2018 until April 2020 when Mellanox was acquired by Nvidia Corporation. He also served on the board of directors of HomeUnion, Inc. (HomeUnion), an online investment management platform dedicated to the residential real estate market, from November 2018 until November 2019 when HomeUnion was acquired by Mynd Property Management. From August 2016 to November 2018, he was an advisor to HomeUnion’s board of directors. Mr. Olson also served on the board of directors of InvenSense, Inc. (InvenSense), a provider of MEMS sensor platforms, from October 2011 until May 2017 when InvenSense was acquired by TDK Corporation. Mr. Olson’s qualifications include his more than 30 years of experience in senior roles of financial responsibility in the semiconductor industry, together with his track record of growing profitable businesses and his experience at various semiconductor and technology companies.
Elizabeth W Vanderslice	57	Ms. Vanderslice joined the Board in December 2000. Since February 2019, she has served as a partner at Trewstar Corporate Board Services, a search firm specializing in placing women on corporate boards. From 1999 to 2001, Ms. Vanderslice served as a general manager of Lycos, Inc. through its acquisition and subsequent reorganization. From 1996 to 1999, Ms. Vanderslice was CEO of Wired Digital, Inc., the online-media division of Wired Ventures, Inc., and a member of the boards of both Wired Digital, Inc. and Wired Ventures, Inc. before leading the company’s acquisition by Lycos, Inc. Prior to joining Wired Digital in early 1995, Ms. Vanderslice served as a principal in the investment banking firm Sterling Payot Company, where she helped raise the capital to launch Wired Magazine, and as Vice President at H.W. Jesse & Co., a San Francisco investment banking firm. She also worked for the IBM Corporation before earning her MBA from the Harvard Business School. Ms. Vanderslice is an Aspen Institute Henry Crown Fellow and was a member and officer of the Young Presidents’ Organization and the World Presidents’ Organization. She also serves as a Trustee of Boston College. Ms. Vanderslice brings a broad range of skills to the Board from her experience as the CEO and board member of an innovative internet access and original content provider and an investment banker. In addition to her academic and professional background in computer science and systems engineering, Ms. Vanderslice contributes to the Board’s understanding of the Company’s sales and marketing efforts and engineering management, and her experience in mergers and acquisitions is valuable to the Board in evaluating strategic transactions.
Dennis Segers	68	Mr. Segers joined the Board in October 2015 and was named Chairman of the Board in November 2015. He works as a technology consultant and strategy advisor to companies in a variety of technology markets. Mr. Segers currently also serves on the board of Parade Technologies, Ltd., a publicly-traded fabless semiconductor company. Previously, he was CEO of Tabula, Inc., an innovative programmable logic solutions provider, delivering breakthrough capabilities for challenging systems applications. Prior to Tabula, he served as president, CEO and a director of Matrix Semiconductor, a pioneer of three-dimensional integrated circuits, a first in the history of semiconductor technology. At Matrix, Mr. Segers oversaw the transition of the company from the early technology feasibility phase to high volume production, culminating in the acquisition of the company by SanDisk in January 2006. From 1994 through 2001, Mr. Segers was an employee of Xilinx, serving in a variety of leadership roles including Senior Vice President and General Manager of the FPGA product groups. Mr. Segers has extensive experience serving in executive management and on boards of directors of companies in the semiconductor industry. As a result of his experience, Mr. Segers is able to provide important strategic perspectives on the semiconductor industry and issues facing semiconductor companies.

Name and Position		Year		Salary (1) ($)		Bonus (2) ($)	Stock Awards (3) ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4) ($)		All Other Compensation (5) ($)		Total ($)
Victor Peng (6) President and Chief Executive Officer		2021		950,000			11,918,915		1,727,813		4,500		14,601,228
		2020		887,500			9,324,173		1,005,141		5,438		11,222,252
		2019		700,000			4,181,520		1,703,625		4,662		6,589,807
Brice Hill (7) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2021		537,660		350,000	4,985,989		622,963		5,167		6,501,779
	William Madden Executive Vice President and General Manager, Wired and Wireless Group		2021		525,000			3,772,608		573,563		6,000		4,877,171
		2020		508,750			2,458,254		383,538		6,488		3,357,030
		2019		445,000			1,471,570		699,688		4,950		2,621,208
Salil Raje (6) Executive Vice President and General Manager, Data Center Group		2021		525,000			3,772,608		584,063		4,500		4,886,171
		2020		508,750			2,458,254		383,538		5,708		3,356,250
		2019		445,000			1,471,570		699,688		5,829		2,622,087
Vamsi Boppana (8) Senior Vice President, Central Products Group		2021		440,000			3,247,308		398,640		—		4,085,948
		2020		432,500			1,486,386		263,220		—		2,182,106

Supplier name	Ticker
ASML Holding N.V.	ASML
Agilent Technologies, Inc.	A
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.	ASX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.	FCX
International Business Machines Corporation	IBM
3M Company	MMM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited	TSM

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company