KLNG 10-Q Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025

The Company leases land, buildings, and certain equipment under non-cancellable operating leases. We lease office, indoor manufacturing, warehouse, and operating space in Houston, Texas and Macaé, Brazil, and lease storage space in Mobile, Alabama to house our 3,400 metric ton and 3,500 metric ton carousel systems. We classify our leases related to certain office furniture and computer equipment as finance leases. The Company elects to apply the short-term lease exception; therefore, the Company will not record an right of use (“ROU”) asset or corresponding lease liability for leases with an initial term of twelve months or less that is not reasonably certain of being renewed and instead will recognize a single lease cost allocated over the lease term, generally on a straight-line basis. The Company elects to apply the practical expedient to not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for both as a single lease component for all asset classes.

Most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term on a monthly, annual or longer basis. The exercise of lease renewal options is at the Company’s sole discretion. Certain leases also include options to purchase the leased property. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements is limited by the expected lease term unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option that is reasonably certain of being exercised.

The Company elects to not capitalize any lease in which the estimated value of the underlying asset at the commencement date is less than the Company’s capitalization threshold. A lease would need to qualify for the low value exception based on various criteria.

As of September 30, 2025, the Company does not have any subleases.

The following tables present information about our operating and finance leases:

The components of our lease expense were as follows:

The lease term and discount rate for our operating and finance leases were as follows:

Present value of lease liabilities:

Revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. To determine the proper revenue recognition method for our customer contracts, we evaluate whether two or more contracts should be combined and accounted for as one single contract and whether the combined or single contract should be accounted for as more than one performance obligation. This evaluation requires significant judgment and the decision to combine a group of contracts or separate the combined or single contract into multiple performance obligations could change the amount of revenue and profit recorded in a given period.

For most of our fixed price contracts, the customer contracts with us to provide a significant service of integrating a complex set of tasks and components into a single project or capability even if that single project results in the delivery of multiple units. Hence, the entire contract is accounted for as one performance obligation. We account for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by fixed price and service contracts. Sales taxes are excluded from revenues.

Fixed price contracts

For fixed price contracts, we generally recognize revenue over time as we perform because of continuous transfer of control to the customer. This continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in the contract that allow the customer to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience, pay us for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit and take control of any work in process. In our fixed price contracts, the customer either controls the work in process or we deliver products with no alternative use to the Company and have rights to payment for work performed to date plus a reasonable profit as evidenced by contractual termination clauses.

Because of control transferring over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the products or services to be provided. We generally use the cost-to-cost measure of progress for our contracts because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as we incur costs on our contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion of the performance obligation. Revenues, including estimated fees or profits, are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred.

Contracts are often modified to account for changes in contract specifications and requirements. We consider a contract modification to exist when the modification either creates new, or changes the existing, enforceable rights and obligations. Most of our contract modifications are for goods or services that are not distinct from the existing contract due to the significant integration service provided in the context of the contract and are accounted for as if they were part of that existing contract. The effect of a contract modification on the transaction price, and our measure of progress for the performance obligation to which it relates, is recognized as an adjustment to revenue (either as an increase in or a reduction of revenue) on a cumulative catch-up basis.

We have a company-wide standard and disciplined quarterly estimate at completion process in which management reviews the progress and execution of our performance obligations. As part of this process, management reviews information including, but not limited to, any outstanding key contract matters, progress towards completion and the related program schedule, identified risks and opportunities and the related changes in estimates of revenues and costs. Changes in estimates of net sales, cost of sales and the related impact to operating income are recognized quarterly on a cumulative catch-up basis, which recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a performance obligation’s percentage of completion. A significant change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of one or more of our performance obligations. When estimates of total costs to be incurred exceed total estimates of revenue to be earned on a performance obligation related to fixed price contracts, a provision for the entire loss on the performance obligation is recognized in the period the loss is estimated.

Service Contracts

We recognize revenue for service contracts measuring progress toward satisfying the performance obligation in a manner that best depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer. The control over services is transferred over time when the services are rendered to the customer on a daily basis. Specifically, we recognize revenue as the services are provided as we have the right to invoice the customer for the services performed. Services are billed on a monthly basis. Payment terms for services are usually 30 days from invoice receipt but can increase to 45, 60, or 90 days depending on the customer.

Contract balances

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts arise when revenues are recorded based on the extent of progress towards completion but cannot be invoiced under the terms of the contract. Such amounts are invoiced upon completion of contractual milestones. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts arise when milestone billings are permissible under the contract, but the related costs have not yet been incurred. All contract costs are recognized currently on jobs formally approved by the customer and contracts are not shown as complete until virtually all anticipated costs have been incurred and the risk of loss has passed to the customer.

Assets related to costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, as well as liabilities related to billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, have been classified as current. The contract cycle for certain long-term contracts may extend beyond one year; thus, complete collection of amounts related to these contracts may extend beyond one year though such long-term contracts include contractual milestone billings as discussed above. As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, there were no contracts with terms that extended beyond one year.

The following table summarizes our contract assets, which are “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” and our contract liabilities, which are “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts”.

The contract asset and liability balances as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, consisted primarily of revenue related to fixed-price projects.

Remaining Performance Obligations

Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of firm orders for which work has not been performed and excludes unexercised contract options, potential orders, and any remaining performance obligations for any sales arrangements that had not fully satisfied the criteria to be considered a contract with a customer pursuant to the requirements of ASC 606.

Practical Expedients and Exemptions

We generally expense sales commissions when incurred because the amortization period would have been one year or less. These costs are recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses.

Many of our services contracts are short-term in nature with a contract term of one year or less. For those contracts, we have utilized the practical expedient exempting the Company from disclosure of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if the performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less.

Additionally, our payment terms are short-term in nature with settlements of one year or less. We have, therefore, utilized the practical expedient exempting the Company from adjusting the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component given that the period between when the entity transfers a promised good or service to a customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will be one year or less.

Further, in many of our service contracts, we have a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of our performance completed to date (for example, a service contract in which we bill a fixed amount for each hour of service provided). For those contracts, we have utilized the practical expedient allowing us to recognize revenue in the amount for which we have the right to invoice.

Accordingly, we do not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less and (ii) contracts for which we recognize revenue at the amount to which we have the right to invoice for services performed.

PP&E consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 was $ 141 and $ 129 , respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 was $ 412 and $ 394 , respectively

Share-based compensation is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and additional paid-in capital in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recognized a total of $ 92 and $ 241 of share-based compensation expense, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company recognized a total of $ 23 and $ 76 of share-based compensation expense, respectively. The unamortized estimated fair value of nonvested stock options was $ 365 and $ 157 on September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. The unamortized estimated fair value of nonvested restricted stock was $ 311 and $ 122 on September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Treasury shares are accounted for using the cost method.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 is intended to improve income tax disclosures primarily through enhanced disclosure of income tax rate reconciliation items, and disaggregation of income (loss) from continuing operations, income tax expense (benefit) and income taxes paid, net disclosures by federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions, among others. ASU 2023-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 as of January 1, 2025, and the corresponding impacts will be reflected in the annual disclosures connected to income taxes.

Income tax expense during interim periods is based on applying the estimated annual effective income tax rate to interim period operations. The estimated annual effective income tax rate may vary from the statutory rate due to the impact of permanent items relative to our pre-tax income, as well as by any valuation allowance recorded. We employ an asset and liability approach that results in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial basis and the tax basis of those assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, management has recorded a full deferred tax asset valuation allowance.

CEO Employment Agreement

Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) is employed under an employment agreement containing severance provisions. In the event of termination of the CEO’s employment for any reason, the CEO will be entitled to receive all accrued, unpaid salary and vacation time through the date of termination and all benefits to which the CEO is entitled or vested under the terms of all employee benefit and compensation plans, agreements, and arrangements in which the CEO participates as of the date of termination.

In addition, subject to executing a general release in favor of the Company, the CEO will be entitled to receive certain severance payments in the event his employment is terminated by the Company “other than for cause” or by the CEO with “good reason.” These severance payments include: (i) a lump sum in cash equal to one time the CEO’s annual base salary; (ii) a lump sum in cash equal to a pro rata portion of the annual bonus payable for the period in which the date of termination occurs based on the actual performance under the Company’s annual incentive bonus arrangement, but no less than fifty percent of the CEO’s annual base salary; and (iii) if the CEO’s termination occurs prior to the date that is twelve months following a change of control, then each and every share option, restricted share award and other equity-based award that is outstanding and held by the CEO shall immediately vest and become exercisable.

CFO Employment Agreement

Our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) is also employed under an employment agreement containing severance provisions. In the event of termination of the CFO’s employment for any reason, the CFO will be entitled to receive all accrued, unpaid salary and vacation time through the date of termination and all benefits to which the CFO is entitled or vested under the terms of all employee benefit and compensation plans, agreements, and arrangements in which the CFO participates as of the date of termination.

In addition, subject to executing a general release in favor of the Company, the CFO will be entitled to receive certain severance payments in the event his employment is terminated by the Company “other than for cause” or by the CFO with “good reason.” These severance payments include: (i) a lump sum in cash equal to six months of the CFO’s annual base salary; (ii) a lump sum in cash equal to a pro rata portion of the annual bonus payable for the period in which the date of termination occurs based on the actual performance under the Company’s annual incentive bonus arrangement, but no less than fifty percent of the CFO’s annual base salary; and (iii) if the CFO’s termination occurs prior to the date that is twelve months following a change of control, then each and every share option, restricted share award and other equity-based award that is outstanding and held by the CFO shall immediately vest and become exercisable.

Litigation

From time to time, the Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company expenses or accrues legal costs as incurred and is not involved in any material legal proceedings as of the date of these financial statements.

WW Champion Developments Lawsuit

The Company was previously involved in a legal dispute with its former landlord, WW Champion Developments, Inc. ("WW Champion”). On September 23, 2024, WW Champion filed a lawsuit against the Company alleging breach of contract and seeking money damages of $1,229 in the 281 ^st District Court of Harris County in an action styled WW Champion Developments, Inc. vs. Koil Energy Solutions, Inc. , Cause Number 2024-65006. WW Champion alleged that Koil Energy breached a lease agreement between the parties by abandoning the premises, failing to maintain proper fire prevention measures, and failing to pay its remaining rental payments.

The matter was settled in June 2025 for $ 590 . The Company had previously recorded a liability of $ 923 and therefore recognized a gain of $ 333 upon resolution of the lawsuit. This gain is recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations under Other (income), net. Payment terms for the settlement included the forfeiture of a $90 deposit, a $200 payment on July 1, 2025, and six monthly payments of $50 each commencing August 1, 2025.

OMSi Lawsuit

In December 2024, the Company completed work under purchase orders with OMS International Limited (OMSi), a UK-based subsea engineering firm. The Company successfully completed the project in March 2025 and issued invoices totaling $ 569 . OMSi has not remitted payment on the outstanding invoices and has not responded to the Company’s repeated requests for payment.

On September 29, 2025, the Company filed a civil action against OMSi in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking to recover the unpaid amounts. OMSi has not yet filed a response. For the quarter ending September 30, 2025, the Company recorded a reserve of $ 569 in Allowance for Credit Losses. The Company intends to pursue full recovery and will adjust the reserve as new information becomes available.

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive effect of common stock equivalents (warrants, nonvested stock awards and stock options) using the treasury method.

In each relevant period, the net income used in the basic and diluted EPS calculations is the same. The following table reconciles the weighted-average basic number of common shares outstanding and the weighted-average diluted number of common shares outstanding for the purpose of calculating basic and diluted EPS.

Under the provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) signed into law on March 27, 2020. and the subsequent extension of the CARES Act, the Company was eligible for a refundable employee retention credit subject to certain criteria. Since there are no generally accepted accounting principles for for-profit business entities that receive government assistance that is not in the form of a loan, an income tax credit or revenue from a contract with a customer, we determined the appropriate accounting treatment by analogy to other guidance. The Company accounted for the employee retention credit by analogy to International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) 20, “Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).”

Under an IAS 20 analogy, a business entity would recognize the employee retention credit on a systematic basis over the periods in which the entity recognizes the payroll expenses for which the grant (i.e., tax credit) is intended to compensate when there is reasonable assurance (i.e., it is probable) that the entity will comply with any conditions attached to the grant and the grant will be received.

The Company recognized a $ 650 employee retention credit as other income on its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021. In January 2025, the Company received $ 365 for the remaining employee retention credit balance including the $ 323 applied to an employee retention credit receivable and $ 42 of interest earned.

On May 24, 2023, Koil Energy entered into the Factoring Agreement with Amegy, which provides for the Company from time to time to sell its accounts receivable and other rights to payment to Amegy. Amegy has the right to approve or reject future accounts receivable or other rights to payment proposed for sale under the Factoring Agreement in its sole discretion.

The purchase price for the receivables shall be the gross amount of the invoice minus the discount. The “discount” means 15 % of the gross amount of an invoice that is generated by the rendering of services or selling of goods on a time and materials basis, and 25 % of the gross amount of an invoice that is generated by the rendering of services or selling of goods on a milestone billing basis.

Amegy has the right to charge back any receivable to Koil Energy, and Koil Energy has the obligation to repurchase such receivable, if (a) the receivable is not paid to Amegy within 90 days from the invoice date, at which time it will be deemed to be in dispute, (b) any dispute arises with respect to such receivable, (c) Koil Energy or Amegy discovers or determines that any representation or warranty made by Koil Energy in the Factoring Agreement or in any document executed in connection with the Factoring Agreement (the “Purchase Documents”) is false or misleading, or (d) Koil Energy breaches any covenant or agreement contained in the Factoring Agreement or in any Purchase Document or is otherwise in default thereof.

The receivables sold shall bear interest at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 2.00%. The Prime Rate has a floor and at no time shall it be less than 8.00% for the purposes of the Factoring Agreement. On September 30, 2025, the company had factored invoices outstanding with Amegy recorded as short-term borrowings in the aggregate amount of $ 703 on its condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had no factored invoices outstanding with Amegy.

NOTE 12: SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates as a single operating segment, as an energy services company that provides equipment and support services to the world’s energy and offshore industries. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is its chief executive officer, who reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis. The CODM uses consolidated net income to monitor budget versus actual results in assessing segment performance and the allocation of resources. Significant segment expenses are presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Total operating expenses are presented as follows:

The CODM regularly reviews asset information by consolidated assets since we only have one reportable segment.

On May 22, 2025, the Company financed the purchase of a forklift for $ 137 with a finance charge of $ 12 . The financing arrangement is scheduled to mature on May 23, 2030 , and is payable in monthly installments over a 60-month term . Monthly payments are initially set at approximately $ 3 for the first six months of the agreement with a balloon payment in December 2025 of $ 95 . Thereafter monthly payments are $ 1 per month through maturity.

The note is secured by the forklift and is recorded as part of the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2025, the outstanding principal balance equaled $ 128 . The note is not subject to restrictive covenants beyond customary terms. The liability is classified in current and long-term notes payable.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were filed with the SEC and determined that there have been no events that would require disclosure or adjustment in the condensed consolidated financial statements.